UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.DC 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g)OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20072008

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

OR

 

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto.

Date of event requiring this shell company report

 

Commission file numbers:

numbers
  Barclays PLC  

1-09246

  Barclays Bank PLC  

1-10257

BARCLAYS PLC

BARCLAYS BANK PLC

(Exact namesNames of registrantsRegistrants as specifiedSpecified in their charters)Charters)

ENGLAND

(JurisdictionsJurisdiction of Incorporation)Incorporation or Organization)

1 CHURCHILL PLACE, LONDON E14 5HP, ENGLAND

(Address of principal executive offices)Principal Executive Offices)

PATRICK GONSALVES, +44 (0)20 7116 2901, PATRICK.GONSALVES@BARCLAYS.COM

1 CHURCHILL PLACE, LONDON E14 5HP, ENGLAND

*(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Barclays PLC

 

Title of each classEach Class

  

Name of each exchange on which registeredEach Exchange On Which Registered

Barclays PLC25p ordinary shares  

25p ordinary shares

New York Stock Exchange*

American DepositaryDepository Shares, each

representing four 25p ordinary shares

New York Stock Exchange

*Not for trading, but in connection with the registration of American Depository Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Barclays Bank PLC

Title of Each Class

  

New York Stock Exchange*

New York StockName of Each Exchange On Which Registered

Barclays Bank PLC7.4% Subordinated Notes 2009  New York Stock Exchange
Callable Floating Rate Notes 2035  New York Stock Exchange
Non-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Shares, Series 2  New York Stock Exchange*
American DepositaryDepository Shares, Series
2, each representing one Non-
CumulativeNon-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Share, Series 2  New York Stock Exchange
Non-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Shares, Series 3  New York Stock Exchange*
American DepositaryDepository Shares, Series
2, 3, each representing one Non-
CumulativeNon-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Share, Series 3  New York Stock Exchange
Non-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Shares, Series 4  New York Stock Exchange*
American DepositaryDepository Shares, Series
2, 4, each representing one Non-
CumulativeNon-Cumulative Callable Dollar
Preference Share, Series 4  New York Stock Exchange
Non-Cumulative Callable Dollar Preference Shares, Series 5  iPathSM CBOE S&P 500 BuyWriteNew York Stock Exchange*
American Depository Shares, Series 5, each representing one Non-Cumulative Callable Dollar Preference Share, Series 5  
IndexSMAmericanNew York Stock Exchange
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Grains Total
total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Livestock
Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Nickel Total
Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Copper Total
Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Energy Total
Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Agriculture
Total Return Sub-lndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Natural Gas
Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Copper Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Energy Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Agriculture Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Natural Gas total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Industrial
Metals Total Return Sub-IndexSM
ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® GBP/USD Exchange RateDow Jones-AIG Softs Total Return Sub-Index
SMETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Tin Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Coffee Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Cotton Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Sugar Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Precious Metals Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Platinum Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Cocoa Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Lead Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones-AIG Aluminum Total Return Sub-IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Global Carbon ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Dow Jones – AIG Commodity
Index Total ReturnSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® EUR/USD Exchange RateS&P GSCI
TM Crude Oil Total Return Index ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® S&P GSCI™GSCITM Total Return
Index ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® MSCI India IndexSM ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® S&P GSCI™ Crude Oil TotalEUR/USD Exchange Rate ETN
Return Index ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® GBP/USD Exchange Rate ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® JPY/USD Exchange Rate ETN  NYSE Arca
iPath® S&P500 VIX Short-Term FuturesTM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term FuturesTM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite IndexSM ETNNYSE Arca
iPath® Optimized Currency Carry ETNNYSE Arca
Barclays GEMS IndexTM ETNNYSE Arca
Barclays GEMS Asia 8 ETNNYSE Arca
Barclays Asian and Gulf Currency Revaluation ETNNYSE Arca
Barclays GEMS IndexTM ETNAmerican Stock Exchange

 

*Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American DepositaryDepository Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers’ classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

Barclays PLC  25p ordinary shares  6,534,698,021
£1 staff shares875,0008,371,830,617
Barclays Bank PLC  £1 ordinary shares  2,337,161,0002,338,170,515
  £1 preference shares  1,000
  £100 preference shares  75,000
  100 preference shares  240,000
  $0.25 preference shares  131,000,000237,000,000
  $100 preference shares  100,000

Indicate by check mark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yesþ    No¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if each registrant isthe registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes¨    Noþ

Note — Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantsregistrants: (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants wereregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesþ    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Barclays PLC:

Barclays PLC
Large Accelerated Filer  þAccelerated Filer  ¨Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨
Barclays Bank PLC
Large Accelerated Filer  ¨Accelerated Filer  ¨Non-Accelerated Filer  þ

*Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

Large accelerated filerþ     Accelerated filer¨     Non-accelerated flierU.S. GAAP  ¨

Barclays Bank PLC:

Large accelerated filer¨     Accelerated filer¨     Non-accelerated filerþ

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP¨International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Boardþ

Other¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

*If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

Item 17¨        Item 18¨

If this is an annual report, indicatedindicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨    Noþ

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)YEARS.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have fifedregistrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,1312, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes¨    No¨

 

 


Certain non-IFRS measures

In this document certain non-IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) measures such as profit before business disposals, are reported. Barclays management believes that these non-IFRS measures provide valuable information to readers of its financalfinancial statements because they enable the reader to focus more directly on the underlying day-to-day performance of its businesses and provide more detail concerning the elements of performance which the managers of these businesses are most directly able to influence. They also reflect an important aspect of the way in which operating targets are defined and performance is monitored by Barclays management. However, any non-IFRS measures in this document are not a substitute for IFRS measures and readers should consider the IFRS measures as well.

Market and other data

This document contains information, including statistical data, about certain of Barclays markets and its competitive position. Except as otherwise indicated, this information is taken or derived from Datastream, Dealogic, Euroweek, Thompson Reuters, AMEX/NYSE weekly reports, European ETF reports and other external sources. Barclays cannot guarantee the accuracy of information taken from external sources, or that, in respect of internal estimates, a third party using different methods would obtain the same estimates as Barclays.

Forward-looking statements

This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to certain of the Group’s plans and its current goals and expectations relating to its future financial condition and performance. Barclays cautions readers that no forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements sometimes use words such as “aim”‘may’, “anticipate”‘will’, “target”‘seek’, ‘expect”‘continue’, “estimate”‘aim’, “intend”‘anticipate’, “plan”‘target’, “goal”‘expect’, “believe”‘estimate’, ‘intend’, ‘plan’, ‘goal’, ‘believe’ or other words of similar meaning. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding the Group’s future financial position, income growth, assets, impairment charges, business strategy, capital ratios, leverage, payment of dividends, projected levels of growth in the banking and financial markets, projected costs, estimates of capital expenditures, and plans and objectives for future operations.operations and other statements that are not historical fact. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, UK domestic and global economic and business conditions, the effects of continued volatility in credit markets, market related risks such as changes in interest rates and exchange rates, effects of changes in valuation of credit market exposures, changes in valuation of issued notes, the policies and actions of governmental and regulatory authorities, changes in legislation, the further development of standards and interpretations under IFRS applicable to past, current and future periods, evolving practices with regard to the interpretation and application of standards under IFRS, progress in the integration of Absathe Lehman Brothers North American businesses into the Group’s business and the achievementquantification of synergy targets related to Absa,the benefits resulting from such acquisition, the outcome of pending and future litigation, the success of future acquisitions and other strategic transactions and the impact of competition – a number of which factors are beyond the Group’s control. As a result, the Group’s actual future results may differ materially from the plans, goals, and expectations set forth in the Group’s forward-looking statements.

Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Barclaysherein speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), the London Stock Exchange or applicable law, Barclays does not undertakeexpressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to updaterelease publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained in this announcement to reflect any changeschange in Barclays expectations with regard thereto or any changeschange in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however, consult any additional disclosures that Barclays has made or may make in documents it has filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission including the discussion of risk management in the document.(SEC).


SEC FormFORM 20-F cross reference information

SEC Form 20-F Cross Reference InformationCROSS REFERENCE INFORMATION

 

Form 20-F


item number

      

Page reference and caption references

in this document*document*

1  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers  

Not applicable

2  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable  
Not applicable
3  Key Information  
  Risk factorsA. Selected financial data  

63

2, 12, 304
  Currency of presentationB. Capitalization and indebtedness  

265

Not applicable
  Financial dataC. Reason for the offer and use of proceeds  6Not applicable
   DividendsD. Risk factors  

267

57-61
4  Information on the Company  
  PresentationA. History and development of informationthe company  

146176, 234(Note 38)-239(Note 42),

244(Events after balance sheet date), 305

  GlossaryB. Business overview  

266

30, 135-136, 202-204(Note 14), 232(Note 36), 279-284 (Note 53)
  Business descriptionC. Organizational structure  8
Acquisitions

158

Financial review

3

Recent developments

159

Supervision238(Notes 40 and regulation

110

41), 239(Note 23 Property, plant and equipment

181

Note 34 Contingent liabilities and commitments

200

Note 40 Principal subsidiaries

206

42)
   Note 51 Segmental reportingD. Property, plants and equipment  

247

210(Note 23), 233-224(Note 37)
4A  Unresolved staff comments  
Not applicable
5  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  
  Financial reviewA. Operating results2-52, 135-136, 202-204(Note 14), 232(Note  36), 267(Note 48)
B. Liquidity and capital resources17, 91-92, 111-116, 193, 202-204(Note 14), 214-218(Note 27), 219(Note 29), 226-228(Note 31), 230-231(Note 34), 268-272(Note 49), 278(Note 52)
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.  

3Not applicable

  Capital adequacyD. Trend information  

70

11
  Liquidity managementE. Off-balance sheet arrangements  

91

25-26
  Note 14 Derivative Financial InstrumentsF. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations  172
Note 46 Market Risk

218

Note 48 Liquidity Risk24019
   Note 50 Capital ManagementG. Safe harbor  246Inside front cover
(Forward-looking statements)
6  Directors, Senior Management and Employees  
  

BoardA. Directors and Executive Committee

senior management
  

112

138-139
  Directors’ reportB. Compensation  

114

157-172, 220-226(Note 30), 240-243(Note 43)
  Corporate governance reportC. Board practices  

117

138-139, 141-156, 165-166
  Remuneration reportD. Employees  

128

Accountability and Audit

143

Note 8 Staff costs

168

Note 30 Retirement benefit obligations

190

9-10, 55
   Note 42 Related party transactions and Directors’ remunerationE. Share ownership  

208

157-172, 243(Note 43)
7  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  
  Presentation of informationA. Major shareholders  

146

141, 176
  Directors’ reportB. Related party transactions  

114

240-243(Note 42 Related party transactions and Director’s remuneration

208

43)
   Trading market for ordinary sharesC. Interests of Barclays PLCexperts and counsel  

267

Not applicable

8

  Financial Information  
  FinancialA. Consolidated statements and other financial information  

145

Note 1 Dividends per share –Barclays PLC

166

Note 35 Legal proceedings

201

Note 43 Events after the balance sheet date

212

11, 140, 177-298, 305-306
   Dividends – Barclays PLCB. Significant changes  

267

11, 189, 244(Note 44)
9  The Offer and Listing  
  Trading market for ordinary shares of Barclays PLCA. Offer and listing details  

267

303

B. Plan of distributionNot applicable

Form 20-F

item number

C. Markets302
D. Selling shareholdersNot applicable
E. DilutionNot applicable
   F. Expenses of the issuePage reference in this document*Not applicable
10  Additional Information  
  A. Share capitalNot applicable
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association  

269

305-307
  TaxationC. Material contracts  

271

142, 165-166, 227-228(Note 31)
  D. Exchange controls and other  

273

239(Note 42), 309
  limitations affecting security holdersE. Taxation  307-309
F. Dividends and paying agentsNot applicable
G. Statement by expertsNot applicable
H. Documents on display309
   Documents on displayI. Subsidiary information  

273

238(Note 40)
11  Quantitative and qualitative disclosureQualitative Disclosures about market riskMarket Risk  
Risk management Introduction

65

Credit risk management

74

Monitoring of Loans and advances

80

Allowances for impairment and other credit provisions

84

Potential credit risk loans

82

Loans and advances in non-local currencies

101

Market risk management

86

Derivatives

89

Capital adequacy

70

Liquidity management

91

56-134, 250(Note 14 Derivative financial instruments

172

46)-272(Note 49)
12  Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities  
Not applicable
13  Defaults, DividendsDividend Arrearages and Delinquencies  
Not applicable
14  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds  
Not applicable
15  Controls and Procedures  
  A. Disclosure controls and procedures  

144

174
  B. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting  

143

173
  IndependentC. Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm’s reportfirm  

147

177-178
   D. Changes in internal control over financial reporting  

144

174
15TControls and Procedures173-174, 177
16A  Audit Committee Financial Expert  

122

149
16B  Code of Ethics  

Exhibit 11.1

155
16C  Principal Accountant Fees and Services  

122,169

142, 151(Non-Audit Services Policy), 198-199(Note 9)
16D  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees  
Not applicable
16E  Share RepurchasePurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers  

227(Share repurchase)

19716F

Change in Registrant’s Certifying AccountantNot applicable
16GCorporate Governance143, 155
17  Financial Statements  
Not applicable
18  Financial Statements  
Independent registered public accounting firm’s report for Barclays PLC147
Independent registered public accounting firm report for Barlays Bank PLC148
Accounting policies

149

Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

149

Notes to accounts of Barclays PLC

166

Barclays Bank PLC data

250

Notes to consolidated accounts of Barclays Bank PLC

254

175-300
19  Exhibits  
Included in documents as filed with the SECExhibit Index

*WhereCaptions have been included only in respect of pages with multiple sections on the responsesame page in order to an item ofidentify the relevant caption on that page covered by the corresponding Form 20-F is presented over a number of pages, the page number indicates the page number on which the relevant response begins.item number.


Contents

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Contents

Section 1 Business review

  31

Financial review

  31

Corporate sustainability

  5853

Our people

55

Risk management

  6156

Section 2 Governance

  111137

Board and Executive Committee

  112138

Directors’ report

  114140

Corporate governance report

  117143

Remuneration report

  128157

Accountability and audit

  143173

Section 3 Financial statements

  145175

Presentation of information

  146176

Independent Auditors’ report/Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm’s report – Barclays PLC

  147
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm’s report – Barclays Bank PLC
148177

Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

  149179

Consolidated accounts Barclays Bank PLC data

  250285

Section 4 Shareholder information

  267


Barclays301

Annual Report 2007

1


Glossary of termsLOGO

 

Absa definitions

“Absa Group Limited” refers to the consolidated results of the South African group of which the parent company is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE Limited) in which Barclays owns a controlling stake.

“Absa” refers to the results for Absa Group Limited as consolidated into the results of Barclays PLC; translated into Sterling with adjustments for amortisation of intangible assets, certain head office adjustments, transfer pricing and minority interests.

“International Retail and Commercial Banking-Absa” is the portion of Absa’s results that is reported by Barclays within the International Retail and Commercial Banking business.

“Absa Capital” is the portion of Absa’s results that is reported by Barclays within the Barclays Capital business.

Other definitionsFinancial review

“Income” refers to total income net of insurance claims, unless otherwise specified.

“Profit before business disposals” represents profit before tax and disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures.

“Cost:income ratio” is defined as operating expenses compared to total income net of insurance claims.

“Risk Tendency” is a statistical estimate of the average loss for each loan portfolio for a 12-month period, taking into account the size of the portfolio and its risk characteristics under current economic conditions, and is used to track the change in risk as the portfolio of loans changes over time. Further information on Risk Tendency is included under “Risk Management — Credit Risk Management”

“Daily Value at Risk (DVaR)” is an estimate of the potential loss which might arise from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day, measured to a confidence level of 98%.


 

2Consolidated income statement  

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

2


LOGO

Income statement commentary3
Consolidated balance sheet  

Financial

review

12
Balance sheet commentary13
Group performanceCapital management  417
Additional financial disclosure18
Financial dataDeposits and short-term borrowings  618
Commitments and contractual obligations19
Securities  20
Average balance sheet  21
Off-balance sheet arrangements  25
Critical accounting estimates27
Business description  830
Analysis of results by business  10
Results by nature of income and expense33
Total assets and risk weighted assets40
Capital management42
Capital resources and deposits44
Deposits and short-term borrowings45
Commitments and contractual obligations46
Securities47
Critical accounting estimates48
Off-balance sheet arrangements51
Barclays Capital credit market positions53
Average balance sheet54
Corporate sustainability5831

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

3


Financial reviewConsolidated income statement

 

 

Group Performance

Barclays delivered profit before tax of £7,076m. Earnings per share were 68.9p and we increased the full year dividend payout to 34p, a rise of 10%.

Income grew 7% to £23,000m. Growth was well spread by business, with strong contributions from International Retail and Commercial Banking, Barclays Global Investors and Barclays Wealth. Net income, after impairment charges, grew 4% and included net losses of £1,635m relating to credit market turbulence, net of £658m of gains arising from the fair valuation of notes issued by Barclays Capital and settlements on overdraft fees in relation to prior years of £116m in UK Retail Banking.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions rose 30% to £2,795m. Impairment charges relating to US sub-prime mortgages and other credit market exposures were £782m. Excluding these sub-prime related charges, impairment charges improved 7% to £2,013m. In UK Retail Banking and Barclaycard, impairment charges improved significantly, as a consequence of reductions in flows into delinquency and arrears balances in UK cards and unsecured loans. UK mortgage impairment charges remained negligible, with low levels of defaults, and the wholesale and corporate sector remained stable. The significant increase in impairment charges in International Retail and Commercial Banking was driven by very strong book growth.

Operating expenses increased 4% to £13,199m. We invested in growing the branch network and distribution channels in International Retail and Commercial Banking and in infrastructure development in Barclays Global Investors. Costs were lower in UK Banking and broadly flat in Barclays Capital. Gains from property disposals were £267m (2006: £432m). The Group cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 57%.

Business Performance – Global Retail and Commercial Banking

In UK Bankingwe improved the cost:income ratio a further two percentage points to 48%, excluding settlements on overdraft fees in relation to prior years of £116m. On this basis we have delivered a cumulative eight percentage point improvement in the past three years, well ahead of our target of six percentage points.

UK Retail Bankingprofit before tax grew 9% to £1,282m. Income grew 2% excluding settlements on overdraft fees in relation to prior years of £116m, reflecting a very strong performance in Personal Customer Retail Savings and good performances in Current Accounts, Local Business and Home Finance, partially offset by lower income from loan protection insurance. Enhancements in product offering and continued improvements in processing capacity enabled a strong performance in mortgage origination, with a share of net new lending of 8%. Operating expenses were well controlled and improved 3%. Impairment charges improved 12% reflecting lower charges in unsecured consumer lending and Local Business. This was driven by improvements in the collection process which led to reduced flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and stable charge-offs. Mortgage impairment charges remained negligible.


4

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Barclays Commercial Bankdelivered profit before tax of £1,371m. Profit before business disposals improved 5%. Income improved 7% driven by very strong growth in fees and commissions and steady growth in net interest income. Non-interest income increased to 32% of total income reflecting continuing focus on cross sales and efficient balance sheet utilisation. Operating expenses rose 6%, reflecting increased investment in product development and support, sales force capability and operational efficiency. Impairment charges increased £38m as a result of asset growth and higher charges in Larger Business.

Barclaycardprofit before tax increased to £540m, 18% ahead of the prior year. Steady income relative to 2006 reflected strong growth in Barclaycard International offset by a reduction in UK card extended credit balances as we re-positioned the UK business and reduced lower credit quality exposures including the sale of the Monument card portfolio. As a result, impairment charges improved 21%, reflecting more selective customer recruitment, client management and improved collections. Operating expenses increased 12%, driven by continued investment in Barclaycard International and the non-recurrence of a property gain included in the 2006 results. Barclaycard US continued to make good progress, and for the first time made a profit for the year.

International Retail and Commercial Bankingprofits declined 23% to £935m. Results in 2006 included a £247m profit on disposals and £41m post tax profit share from FirstCaribbean International Bank. 2007 results reflected a 12% decline in the average value of the Rand.

International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absadelivered a profit before tax of £246m. Income rose 28% as we significantly increased the pace of organic growth across the business, with especially strong growth in Emerging Markets and Spain. Operating expenses grew 32% as we expanded the distribution footprint, opening 324 new branches and 157 new sales centres and also invested in rolling out a common technology platform and processes across the business. Impairment increased to £79m including very strong balance sheet growth and lower releases.

International Retail and Commercial Banking – AbsaSterling profit fell £9m to £689m after absorbing the 12% decline in the average value of the Rand. Retail loans and advances grew 22% and retail deposits grew 20%.

Business Performance – Investment Banking and Investment Management

Barclays Capitaldelivered a 5% increase in profit before tax to £2,335m. Net income was ahead of last year, reflecting very strong performances in most asset classes including interest rates, currencies, equity products and commodities. Results also included net losses arising from credit market turbulence of £1,635m net of gains from the fair valuation of issued notes of £658m. All geographies outside the US enjoyed significant growth in income and profits. Strong cost control led to operating expenses declining slightly year on year.

Barclays Global Investors(BGI) profit before tax increased 3% to £734m. Income grew 16%, driven by very strong growth in management fees and in securities lending revenues. Profit and income growth were both affected by the 8% depreciation in the average value of the US Dollar. BGI costs increased 25% as we continued to build our infrastructure across multiple products and platforms to support future growth.

The cost:income ratio rose to 62%. Assets under management grew US$265bn to US$2.1 trillion, including net new assets of US$86bn.

Barclays Wealthprofit before tax rose 25% to £307m. Income growth of 11% was driven by increased client funds and greater transaction volumes. Costs were well controlled as business volumes rose and the cost:income ratio improved three percentage points to 76%. We continued to invest in client facing staff and infrastructure. Redress costs declined. Total client assets increased 14% to £133bn.

Head office functions and other operations

Head Office functions and other operationsloss before tax increased 65% to £428m reflecting higher inter-segment adjustments and lower gains from hedging activities.

Capital management

At 31st December 2007, our Basel I Tier 1 Capital ratio was 7.8% (2006: 7.7%). We started managing capital ratios under Basel II from 1st January 2008. Our Basel II Tier 1 Capital ratio was 7.6%. Our Equity Tier 1 ratio was 5.0% under Basel I (2006: 5.3%) and 5.1% under Basel II.

We have increased the proposed dividend payable to shareholders in respect of 2007 by 10%. We maintain our progressive approach to dividends, expecting dividend growth broadly to match earnings growth over time.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

5


Financial data

Consolidated income statement summary

For the year ended 31st December

For the year ended 31st December   
  

2007

 

£m

   

2006

 

£m

   

2005

 

£m

   2004
£ma
   

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 

2005

£m

 2004
£ma
 

Net interest income

  9,610   9,143   8,075   6,833   11,469  9,610  9,143  8,075  6,833 

Net fee and commission income

  7,708   7,177   5,705   4,847   8,407  7,708  7,177  5,705  4,847 

Principal transactions

  4,975   4,576   3,179   2,514   2,009  4,975  4,576  3,179  2,514 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  1,011   1,060   872   1,042   1,090  1,011  1,060  872  1,042 

Other income

  188   214   147   131   377  188  214  147  131 

Total income

  23,492   22,170   17,978   15,367   23,352  23,492  22,170  17,978  15,367 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  (492)  (575)  (645)  (1,259)  (237) (492) (575) (645) (1,259)

Total income net of insurance claims

  23,000   21,595   17,333   14,108   23,115  23,000  21,595  17,333  14,108 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

  (2,795)  (2,154)  (1,571)  (1,093)  (5,419) (2,795) (2,154) (1,571) (1,093)

Net income

  20,205   19,441  ��15,762   13,015   17,696  20,205  19,441  15,762  13,015 

Operating expenses

  (13,199)  (12,674)  (10,527)  (8,536)  (14,366) (13,199) (12,674) (10,527) (8,536)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  42   46   45   56   14  42  46  45  56 

Profit before business disposals

  7,048   6,813   5,280   4,535 

Profit before business acquisitions and disposals

  3,344  7,048  6,813  5,280  4,535 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  28   323      45   327  28  323    45 

Gains on acquisitions

  2,406         

Profit before tax

  7,076   7,136   5,280   4,580   6,077  7,076  7,136  5,280  4,580 

Tax

  (1,981)  (1,941)  (1,439)  (1,279)  (790) (1,981) (1,941) (1,439) (1,279)

Profit after tax

  5,095   5,195   3,841   3,301   5,287  5,095  5,195  3,841  3,301 

Profit attributable to minority interests

  678   624   394   47   905  678  624  394  47 

Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent

  4,417   4,571   3,447   3,254   4,382  4,417  4,571  3,447  3,254 
  5,095   5,195   3,841   3,301 
  5,287  5,095  5,195  3,841  3,301 
        

Selected financial statistics

               

Basic earnings per share

  68.9p   71.9p   54.4p   51.0p   59.3p  68.9p  71.9p  54.4p  51.0p 

Diluted earnings per share

  66.7p   69.8p   52.6p   49.8p   57.5p  66.7p  69.8p  52.6p  49.8p 

Dividends per ordinary share

  34.0p   31.0p   26.6p   24.0p   11.5p  34.0p  31.0p  26.6p  24.0p 

Dividend payout ratio

  49.3%   43.1%   48.9%   47.1%   19.4%  49.3%  43.1%  48.9%  47.1% 

Profit attributable to the equity holders of the parent as a percentage of:

              

average shareholders’ equity

  20.3%   24.7%   21.1%   21.7%   16.5%  20.3%  24.7%  21.1%  21.7% 

average total assets

  0.3%   0.4%   0.4%   0.5%   0.2%  0.3%  0.4%  0.4%  0.5% 

Selected statistical measures

            

Cost:income ratiob

  57%   59%   61%   61% 

Cost: income ratio

  62%  57%  59%  61%  61% 

Average United States Dollar exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  2.00   1.84   1.82   1.83   1.86  2.00  1.84  1.82  1.83 

Average Euro exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  1.46   1.47   1.46   1.47   1.26  1.46  1.47  1.46  1.47 

Average Rand exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  14.11   12.47   11.57   11.83   15.17  14.11  12.47  11.57  11.83 

The financial information above is extracted from the published accounts for the last three years. This information should be read together with, and is qualified by reference to, the accounts and notes included in this report.

Note

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

bDefined
2

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Income statement commentary

Income statement

Barclays delivered profit before tax of £6,077m in 2008, a decline of 14% on 2007. The results included the following significant items:

gains on page 2.acquisitions of £2,406m, including £2,262m gain on acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses

 

profit on disposal of Barclays Closed UK Life assurance business of £326m

gains on Visa IPO and sales of shares in MasterCard of £291m, distributed widely across the Group

gross credit market losses and impairment of £8,053m, or £4,957m net of related income and hedges of £1,433m and gains on own credit of £1,663m

Profit after tax increased 4% to £5,287m. This reflected an effective tax rate of 13% (2007: 28%) primarily due to the gain on the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £2,262m in part being offset by carried forward US tax losses attributable to Barclays businesses. Earnings per share were 59.3p (2007: 68.9p), a decline of 14% from 2007, reflecting the impact of share issuance during 2008 on the weighted average number of shares in issue.

Income grew 1% to £23,115m. Income in Global Retail and Commercial Banking increased 17% and was particularly strong in businesses outside of the UK to which we have directed significant resource. Income in Investment Banking and Investment Management was down 19%. Barclays Capital was affected by very challenging market conditions in 2008, with income falling by £1,888m (27%) on 2007, reflecting gross losses of £6,290m relating to credit market assets, partially offset by gains of £1,663m on the fair valuation of notes issued by Barclays

Capital due to widening of credit spreads and £1,433m in related income and hedges. Excluding credit market related losses, gains on own credit and related income and hedges, income in Barclays Capital increased 6%.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions of £5,419m increased 94% on the prior year. Impairment charges included £1,763m arising from US sub-prime mortgages and other credit market exposures. Other wholesale impairment charges increased significantly as corporate credit conditions turned sharply worse. In Barclays Capital increased charges also arose in prime services, corporate lending and private equity. In Barclays Commercial Bank, increased impairment charges reflected the UK economy moving into recession. In the UK there was a moderate increase in impairment in UK Retail Banking as a result of book growth and a deteriorating economic environment. UK mortgage impairment charges remained low. There was a lower charge in UK cards as net flows into delinquency and arrears levels reduced. Significant impairment growth in our Global Retail and Commercial Banking businesses outside the UK reflected very strong book growth in recent years, and maturation of those portfolios, together with deteriorating credit conditions and rising delinquency rates in the US, South Africa and Spain.

Operating expenses increased 9% to £14,366m. We continued to invest in our distribution network in the Global Retail and Commercial Banking businesses. Expenses fell in Barclays Capital due to lower performance related costs. Expenses in Barclays Global Investors included selective support of liquidity products of £263m (2007: £80m). Group gains from property disposals were £148m (2007: £267m). Head office reflects £101m due to the cost of the contribution to the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Underlying cost growth was well controlled. The Group cost:income ratio deteriorated by five percentage points to 62%.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

3


Financial review

Income statement commentary

Net interest income

2008/07

Group net interest income increased 19% (£1,859m) to £11,469m (2007: £9,610m) reflecting balance sheet growth across the Global Retail and Commercial Banking businesses and in particular very strong growth internationally driven by expansion of the distribution network and entrance into new markets. An increase in net interest income was also seen in Barclays Capital due to strong results from global loans and money markets.

Group net interest income includes the impact of structural hedges which function to reduce the impact of the volatility of short-term interest rate movements on equity and customer balances that do not re-price with market rates. The contribution of structural hedges relative to average base rates increased income by £117m (2007: £351m expense), largely due to the effect of the structural hedge on changes in interest rates.

2007/06

Group net interest income increased 5% (£467m) to £9,610m (2006: £9,143m) reflecting balance sheet growth across a number of businesses. The contribution of structural hedges relative to average base rates decreased to £351m expense (2006: £26m income), largely due to the effect of the structural hedge on changes in interest rates. Other interest expense principally includes interest on repurchase agreements and hedging activity.


 

Net interest income

 

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Cash and balances with central banks

  174  145  91 

Available for sale investments

  2,355  2,580  2,811 

Loans and advances to banks

  1,267  1,416  903 

Loans and advances to customers

  23,754  19,559  16,290 

Other

  460  1,608  1,710 
Interest income  28,010  25,308  21,805 

Deposits from banks

  (2,189) (2,720) (2,819)

Customer accounts

  (6,697) (4,110) (3,076)

Debt securities in issue

  (5,910) (6,651) (5,282)

Subordinated liabilities

  (1,349) (878) (777)

Other

  (396) (1,339) (708)
Interest expense  (16,541) (15,698) (12,662)
Net interest income  11,469  9,610  9,143 

4

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Net fee and commission income

2008/07

Net fee and commission income increased 9% (£699m) to £8,407m (2007: £7,708m). Banking and credit related fees and commissions increased 13% (£845m) to £7,208m (2007: £6,363m), reflecting growth in Barclaycard International, increased fees from advisory and origination activities in Barclays Capital and increased foreign exchange, derivative and debt fees in Barclays Commercial Bank.

2007/06

Net fee and commission income increased 7% (£531m) to £7,708m (2006: £7,177m). Fee and commission income rose 8% (£673m) to £8,678m (2006: £8,005m) reflecting increased management and securities lending fees in Barclays Global Investors, increased client assets and higher transactional income in Barclays Wealth and higher income generated from lending fees in Barclays Commercial Bank. Fee income in Barclays Capital increased primarily due to the acquisition of HomEq.


 

Net fee and commission income

 

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Brokerage fees

  87  109  70 

Investment management fees

  1,616  1,787  1,535 

Securities lending

  389  241  185 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  7,208  6,363  6,031 

Foreign exchange commission

  189  178  184 
Fee and commission income  9,489  8,678  8,005 
Fee and commission expense  (1,082) (970) (828)
Net fee and commission income  8,407  7,708  7,177 


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

5


Financial review

Income statement commentary

Principal transactions

2008/07

Principal transactions decreased 60% (£2,966m) to £2,009m (2007: £4,975m).

Net trading income decreased 65% (£2,430m) to £1,329m (2007: £3,759m). The majority of the Group’s net trading income arises in Barclays Capital. Growth in the Rates related business reflected growth in fixed income, prime services, foreign exchange, commodities and emerging markets. The Credit related business included net losses from credit market dislocation partially offset by the benefits of widening credit spreads on structured notes issued by Barclays Capital.

Net investment income decreased 44% (£536m) to £680m (2007: £1,216m). The cumulative gain from disposal of available for sale assets decreased 62% (£348m) to £212m (2007: £560m) reflecting the lower profits realised on the sale of investments. The £212m gain in 2008 included the £47m gain from sale of shares in MasterCard.

The dividend income increased £170m to £196m (2007: £26m) reflecting the Visa IPO dividend received by GRCB – Western Europe, GRCB – Emerging Markets and Barclaycard in the current year. The GRCB – Absa gain on the Visa IPO of £47m has been recognised in other income.

Net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value decreased 89% (£260m) to £33m (2007: £293m), driven by the continued decrease in value of assets backing customer liabilities in Barclays Life Assurance; and fair value decreases of a number of investments reflecting the current market condition.

Other investment income decreased 29% (£98m) to £239m (2007: £337m) due to a number of non-recurring disposals in the prior year.

2007/06

Principal transactions increased 9% (£399m) to £4,975m (2006: £4,576m).

Net trading income increased 4% (£145m) to £3,759m (2006: £3,614m). The majority of the Group’s net trading income arose from Barclays Capital. Growth in the Rates related business reflected very strong performances in fixed income, commodities, foreign exchange, equity and prime services. The Credit related business included net losses from credit market turbulence and the benefits of widening credit spreads on structured notes issued by Barclays Capital.

Net investment income increased 26% (£254m) to £1,216m (2006: £962m). The cumulative gain from disposal of available for sale assets increased 82% (£253m) to £560m (2006: £307m) largely as a result of a number of private equity realisations and divestments. Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value decreased by 34% (£154m) largely due to lower growth in the value of linked insurance assets within Barclays Wealth.

Fair value movements on insurance assets included within net investment income contributed £113m (2006: £205m).

Net premiums from insurance contracts

2008/07

Net premiums from insurance contracts increased 8% (£79m) to £1,090m (2007: £1,011m), primarily due to expansion in GRCB – Western Europe reflecting a full year’s impact of a range of insurance products launched in late 2007, partially offset by lower net premiums following the sale of the closed life assurance book.

2007/06

Net premiums from insurance contracts decreased 5% (£49m) to £1,011m (2006: £1,060m), primarily due to lower customer take up of loan protection insurance.

Other income

2008/07

Certain asset management products offered to institutional clients by Barclays Global Investors are recognised as investment contracts. Accordingly, the invested assets and the related liabilities to investors are held at fair value and changes in those fair values are reported within other income. Other income in 2008 includes a £47m gain from the Visa IPO.

2007/06

Certain asset management products offered to institutional clients by Barclays Global Investors are recognised as investment contracts. Accordingly, the invested assets and the related liabilities to investors are held at fair value and changes in those fair values are reported within other income. Other income in 2007 includes a loss on the part disposal of Monument credit card portfolio and gains on reinsurance transactions in 2007 and 2006.


Principal transactions    
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Rates related business

  4,751  4,162  2,848

Credit related business

  (3,422) (403) 766

Net trading income

  1,329  3,759  3,614
    

Net gain from disposal of available for sale assets

  212  560  307

Dividend income

  196  26  15

Net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value

  33  293  447

Other investment income

  239  337  193

Net investment income

  680  1,216  962

Principal transactions

  2,009  4,975  4,576

Net premiums from insurance contracts    
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Gross premiums from insurance contracts

  1,138  1,062  1,108 

Premiums ceded to reinsurers

  (48) (51) (48)

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  1,090  1,011  1,060 

Other income    
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

(Decrease)/increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (10,422) 5,592  7,417 

Decrease/(increase) in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  10,422  (5,592) (7,417)

Property rentals

  73  53  55 

Loss on part disposal of Monument credit card portfolio

    (27)  

Other

  304  162  159 

Other income

  377  188  214 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Gross claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  263  520  588 

Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred

  (26) (28) (13)

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  237  492  575 

6 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

2008/07

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts decreased 52% (£255m) to £237m (2007: £492m), principally due to a decrease in the value of unit linked insurance contracts in Barclays Wealth; explained by falls in equity markets and disposal of closed life business in October 2008. Partially offsetting these trends is the increase in contract liabilities associated with increased net premiums driven by the growth in GRCB – Western Europe.

2007/06

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts decreased 14% (£83m) to £492m (2006: £575m), principally reflecting lower investment gains attributable to customers in Barclays Wealth.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

2008/07

Impairment charges in UK Retail Banking increased £43m to £602m (2007: £559m), reflecting growth in the book and deteriorating economic conditions. In UK Home Finance, whilst three month arrears increased from 0.63% to 0.91%, the quality of the book and conservative loan to value ratios meant that the impairment charges and amounts charged off remained low at £24m (2007: £3m release). Impairment charges in Consumer Lending increased 3%, reflecting the current economic environment and loan growth.

The impairment charge in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £122m to £414m (2007: £292m), primarily reflecting higher impairment losses in Larger Business, particularly in the final quarter as the UK corporate credit environment deteriorated.

The impairment charge in Barclaycard increased £270m to £1,097m (2007: £827m), reflecting higher charges in Barclaycard International portfolios, particularly Barclaycard US which was driven by loan growth, rising delinquency due to deteriorating economic conditions and exchange rate movements; and £68m from the inclusion of Goldfish. These factors were partially offset by lower charges in UK Cards and secured consumer lending.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Western Europe increased £220m to £296m (2007: £76m), principally due to deteriorating economic trends and asset growth in Spain, where there were higher charges in the commercial portfolios as a consequence of the slowdown in the property and construction sectors. In addition, higher household indebtedness and rising unemployment has driven up delinquency and charge-offs in the personal sector.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Emerging Markets increased £127m to £166m (2007: £39m), reflecting: weakening credit conditions which adversely impacted delinquency trends in the majority of the retail portfolios; asset growth, particularly in India; and increased wholesale impairment in Africa.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Absa increased £201m to £347m (2007: £146m) as a result of rising delinquency levels in the retail portfolios, which have been impacted by rising interest and inflation rates and increasing consumer indebtedness.

Barclays Capital impairment charges of £2,423m (2007: £846m) included a charge of £1,763m (2007: £782m) against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market positions. Further impairment charges of £241m were incurred in respect of available for sale assets and reverse repurchase agreements (2007: nil). Other impairment charges increased £355m to £419m (2007: £64m) and primarily related to charges in the private equity and other loans business.

The impairment charge in Barclays Wealth increased £37m to £44m (2007: £7m) from a very low base. This increase reflected both the substantial increase in the loan book over the last three years and the impact of the current economic environment on client liquidity and collateral values.

The impairment charge In Head office functions and other operations increased £8m to £11m (2007: £3m), mainly reflecting losses on Floating Rate Notes held for hedging purposes. An additional £19m (2007: nil) of impairment charges were incurred on available for sale assets.


Impairment charges and other credit provisions          
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Impairment charges on loans and advances

    

– New and increased impairment allowances

  5,116  2,871  2,722 

– Releases

  (358) (338) (389)

– Recoveries

  (174) (227) (259)

Impairment charges on loans and advances

  4,584  2,306  2,074 

Charge/(release) in respect of provision for undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided

  329  476  (6)

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions

  4,913  2,782  2,068 

Impairment charges on reverse repurchase agreements

  124     

Impairment on available for sale assets

  382  13  86 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

  5,419  2,795  2,154 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions on ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures included above:

          

Impairment charges on loans and advances

  1,218  300   

Charges in respect of undrawn facilities and guarantees

  299  469   

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions on ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures

  1,517  769   

Impairment charges on reverse repurchase agreements

  54     

Impairment charges on available for sale assets

  192  13   

Impairment charges and other credit provisions on ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures

  1,763  782   

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

7


Financial review

Income statement commentary

2007/06

Impairment charges in UK Retail Banking decreased by £76m to £559m (2006: £635m), reflecting lower charges in unsecured Consumer Lending and Local Business driven by improved collection processes, reduced flows into delinquency, lower arrears trends and stable charge-offs. In UK Home Finance, asset quality remained strong and mortgage charges remained negligible. Mortgage delinquencies as a percentage of outstandings remained stable and amounts charged off were low.

The impairment charge in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £39m to £292m (2006: £253m), primarily due to higher impairment charges in Larger Business, partially offset by a lower charge in Medium Business due to a tightening of the lending criteria.

Impairment charges in Barclaycard decreased £226m to £827m (2006: £1,053m), reflecting reduced flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and lower charge-offs in UK Cards. Changes were made to impairment methodologies to standardise the approach and in anticipation of Basel II. The net positive impact of these changes in methodology was offset by the increase in impairment charges in Barclaycard International and secured consumer lending.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Western Europe and GRCB – Emerging Markets rose by £47m to £115m (2006: £68m), reflecting very strong balance sheet growth in 2006 and 2007 and the impact of lower releases in 2007. Arrears in some of GRCB – Absa’s retail portfolios deteriorated in 2007, driven by interest rate increases in 2006 and 2007 resulting in pressure on collections.

Barclays Capital impairment charges and other credit provisions of £846m included a charge of £782m against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures and £58m net of fees relating to drawn leveraged finance positions.

Operating expenses

2008/07

Operating expenses increased 9% (£1,167m) to £14,366m (2007: £13,199m).

Administrative expenses grew 30% (£1,175m) to £5,153m (2007: £3,978m), reflecting the impact of acquisitions (in particular Lehman Brothers North American businesses and Goldfish), fees associated with Group capital raisings, the cost of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme as well as continued investment in the Global Retail and Commercial Banking distribution network. In addition, Barclays Global Investors’ selective support of liquidity products increased to £263m in the year (2007: £80m).

Operating expenses were reduced by gains from the sale of property of £148m (2007: £267m) as the Group continued the sale and leaseback of some of its freehold portfolio, principally in UK Retail Banking, Barclays Commercial Bank and GRCB – Western Europe.

Amortisation of intangible assets increased 56% (£105m) to £291m (2007: £186m), primarily related to intangible assets arising from the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

Goodwill impairment of £111m reflects the full write-down of £74m relating to EquiFirst, a US non-prime mortgage originator and a partial write-down of £37m relating to FirstPlus following its closure to new business in August 2008.

2007/06

Operating expenses grew 4% (£525m) to £13,199m (2006: £12,674m). The increase was driven by growth of 3% (£236m) in staff costs to £8,405m (2006: £8,169m) and lower gains on property disposals.

Administrative expenses remained flat at £3,978m (2006: £3,980m), reflecting good cost control across all businesses.

Operating lease rentals increased 20% (£69m) to £414m (2006: £345m), primarily due to increased property held under operating leases.

Operating expenses          
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Staff costs

  7,779  8,405  8,169 

Administrative expenses

  5,153  3,978  3,980 

Depreciation

  630  467  455 

Impairment charges/(releases)

    

– property and equipment

  33  2  14 

– intangible assets

  (3) 14  7 

– goodwill

  111     

Operating lease rentals

  520  414  345 

Gain on property disposals

  (148) (267) (432)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  291  186  136 

Operating expenses

  14,366  13,199  12,674 

8

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Operating expenses were reduced by gains from the sale of property of £267m (2006: £432m) as the Group continued the sale and leaseback of some of its freehold portfolio, principally in UK Retail Banking.

Amortisation of intangible assets increased 37% (£50m) to £186m (2006: £136m), primarily reflecting the amortisation of mortgage servicing rights relating to the acquisition of HomEq in November 2006.

Staff costs

2008/07

Staff costs decreased 7% (£626m) to £7,779m (2007: £8,405m). Salaries and accrued incentive payments fell overall by 10% (£720m) to £6,273m (2007: £6,993m), after absorbing increases of £718m relating to in year hiring and staff from acquisitions. Performance related costs were 48% lower, driven mainly by Barclays Capital.

Defined benefit plans pension costs decreased 41% (£61m) to £89m (2007: £150m). This was due to recognition of actuarial gains, higher expected return on assets and reduction in past service costs partially offset by higher interest costs and reduction in curtailment credit.

2007/06

Staff costs increased 3% (£236m) to £8,405m (2006: £8,169m). Salaries and accrued incentive payments rose 5% (£358m) to £6,993m (2006: £6,635m), reflecting increased permanent and fixed term staff worldwide. Defined benefit plans pension costs decreased 47% (£132m) to £150m (2006: £282m). This was mainly due to lower service costs.

Staff numbers

2008/07

Staff numbers are shown on a full-time equivalent basis. Total Group permanent and fixed-term contract staff comprised 60,700 (2007: 61,900) in the UK and 95,600 (2007: 73,000) internationally.

UK Retail Banking staff numbers decreased 300 to 30,400 (2007: 30,700). Barclays Commercial Bank staff numbers increased 600 to 9,800 (2007: 9,200), reflecting investment in product expertise, sales and risk capability and associated support areas. Barclaycard staff numbers increased 700 to 9,600 (2007: 8,900), primarily due to the transfer of staff into Absacard as a result of the acquisition of a majority stake in the South African Woolworth Financial Services business in October 2008. GRCB – Western Europe staff numbers increased 2,100 to 10,900 (2007: 8,800), reflecting expansion of the retail distribution network. GRCB – Emerging Markets staff numbers increased 8,800 to 22,700 (2007: 13,900), driven by expansion into new markets and continued investment in distribution in existing countries. GRCB – Absa staff numbers increased 1,000 to 36,800 (2007: 35,800), reflecting continued growth in the business and investment in collections capacity.

Barclays Capital staff numbers increased 6,900 to 23,100 (2007: 16,200), due principally to the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses. Barclays Global Investors staff numbers increased 300 to 3,700 (2007: 3,400). Staff numbers increased primarily in the iShares business due to continued expansion in the global ETF franchise. Barclays Wealth staff numbers increased 1,000 to 7,900 (2007: 6,900), principally due to the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

2007/06

Total Group permanent and fixed term contract staff comprised 61,900 (2006: 62,400) in the UK and 73,000 (2006: 60,200) internationally.


Staff costs         
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Salaries and accrued incentive payments

  6,273  6,993  6,635

Social security costs

  464  508  502

Pension costs

      

– defined contribution plans

  237  141  128

– defined benefit plans

  89  150  282

Other post retirement benefits

  1  10  30

Other

  715  603  592

Staff costs

  7,779  8,405  8,169

Staff numbers         
    2008  2007  2006

UK Retail Banking

  30,400  30,700  34,500

Barclays Commercial Bank

  9,800  9,200  8,100

Barclaycard

  9,600  8,900  9,100

GRCB – Western Europe

  10,900  8,800  6,600

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  22,700  13,900  7,600

GRCB – Absa

  36,800  35,800  33,000

Barclays Capital

  23,100  16,200  13,200

Barclays Global Investors

  3,700  3,400  2,700

Barclays Wealth

  7,900  6,900  6,600

Head office functions and other operations

  1,400  1,100  1,200

Total Group permanent and fixed-term contract staff worldwide

  156,300  134,900  122,600

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

9


Financial datareview

Income statement commentary

UK Retail Banking headcount decreased 3,800 to 30,700 (2006: 34,500), due to efficiency initiatives in back-office operations and the transfer of operations personnel to Barclays Commercial Bank. Barclays Commercial Bank headcount increased 1,100 to 9,200 (2006: 8,100) due to the transfer of operations personnel from UK Retail Banking and additional investment in front line staff to drive improved geographical coverage. Barclaycard staff numbers decreased 200 to 8,900 (2006: 9,100), due to efficiency initiatives implemented across the UK operation and the sale of part of the Monument card portfolio, partially offset by an increase in the International cards businesses. GRCB – Western Europe staff numbers increased 2,200 to 8,800 (2006: 6,600) and GRCB – Emerging Markets staff numbers increased 6,300 to 13,900 (2006: 7,600) due to growth in the distribution network. GRCB – Absa staff numbers increased 2,800 to 35,800 (2006: 33,000) reflecting growth in the business and distribution network.

Barclays Capital staff numbers increased 3,000 to 16,200 (2006: 13,200) including 800 from the acquisition of EquiFirst. This reflected further investment in the front office, systems development and control functions to support continued business expansion. The majority of organic growth was in Asia Pacific. Barclays Global Investors staff numbers increased 700 to 3,400 (2006: 2,700). Headcount increased in all geographical regions and across product groups and the support functions, reflecting continued investment to support further growth. Barclays Wealth staff numbers increased 300 to 6,900 (2006: 6,600) principally due to the acquisition of Walbrook and increased client- facing professionals.

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

2008/07

The overall share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures decreased £28m to £14m (2007: £42m).The share of results from associates decreased £11m mainly due to reduced contribution from private equity associates. The share of results from joint ventures decreased £17m mainly due to reduced contribution from Barclays Capital joint ventures.

2007/06

The overall share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures decreased £4m to £42m (2006: £46m). The share of results from associates decreased £20m mainly due to the sale of FirstCaribbean International Bank (2006: £41m) at the end of 2006, partially offset by an increased contribution from private equity associates. The share of results from joint ventures increased by £16m mainly due to the contribution from private equity entities.

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

2008/07

On 31st October 2008 Barclays completed the sale of Barclays Life Assurance Company Ltd to Swiss Reinsurance Company for a net consideration of £729m leading to a net profit on disposal of £326m.

2007/06

The profit on disposal in 2007 related mainly to the disposal of the Group’s shareholdings in Gabetti Property Solutions (£8m) and Intelenet Global Services (£13m).

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Profit from associates

  22  33  53 

(Loss)/profit from joint ventures

  (8) 9  (7)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  14  42  46 

 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  327  28  323 

10

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Gains on acquisitions

2008/07

The gains on acquisitions in 2008 relate to the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses (£2,262m) on 22nd September 2008, Goldfish credit card UK business (£92m) on 31st March 2008 and Macquarie Bank Limited Italian residential mortgage business (£52m) on 6th November 2008.

Tax

The overall tax charge is explained in the table below.

2008/07

The effective rate of tax for 2008, based on profit before tax, was 13% (2007: 28%). The effective tax rate differs from the 2007 effective rate and the UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% principally due to the Lehman Brothers North American businesses acquisition. Under IFRS the gain on acquisition of £2,262m is calculated net of deferred tax liabilities included in the acquisition balance sheet and is thus not subject to further tax in calculating the tax charge for the year. Furthermore, Barclays has tax losses previously unrecognised as a deferred tax asset but capable of sheltering part of this deferred tax liability. This gives rise to a tax benefit of £492m which, in accordance with IAS 12, is included as a credit within the tax charge for the year. The effective rate has been adversely impacted by the effect of the fall in the Barclays share price on the deferred tax asset recognised on share awards. In common with prior years there have been offsetting adjustments relating to different overseas tax rates, disallowable expenditure and non-taxable gains and income.

2007/06

The tax charge for the period was based on a UK corporation tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%). The effective rate of tax for 2007, based on profit before tax, was 28% (2006: 27%). The effective tax rate differed from 30% as it took account of the different tax rates applied to profits earned outside the UK, non-taxable gains and income and adjustments to prior year tax provisions. The forthcoming change in the UK rate of corporation tax from 30% to 28% on 1st April 2008 led to an additional tax charge in 2007 as a result of its effect on the Group’s net deferred tax asset. The effective tax rate for 2007 was higher than the 2006 rate, principally because there was a higher level of profit on disposals of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures offset by losses or exemptions in 2006.

Gains on acquisitions 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Gains on acquisitions

  2,406     

 

Tax

 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Profit before tax

  6,077  7,076  7,136 

Tax charge at average UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%)

  1,732  2,123  2,141 

Prior year adjustments

  (176) (37) 24 

Differing overseas tax rates

  215  (77) (17)

Non-taxable gains and income (including amounts offset by unrecognised tax losses)

  (833) (136) (393)

Share-based payments

  229  72  27 

Deferred tax assets not previously recognised

  (514) (158) (4)

Change in tax rates

  (1) 24  4 

Other non-allowable expenses

  138  170  159 

Overall tax charge

  790  1,981  1,941 

Effective tax rate

  13%  28%  27% 

2009 Strategic Framework

Our framework for moving the strategy forward in 2009 has the following features:

Responsible corporate citizenship. Governments in the UK and elsewhere have taken significant steps to address the impacts of the financial crisis and recession, and we must work with the authorities and, of course, with our customers, to deal with the crisis in a way which is consistent with our obligations to shareholders.

We have committed to recommencingdividend payments during the second half of 2009. Thereafter, and as previously announced, dividend payments will be made on a quarterly basis. We will set out our dividend policy at the Annual General Meeting in April.

We must ensure that ourcapital position is robust and ourbalance sheet well-managed. We set out within the Financial Review our approach to managing leverage in the balance sheet, and our expectations for capital ratios. For 2009, returns will rank ahead of growth.

To create good returns at this time, we must preservestrategic and operational choice. As conditions remain very difficult in 2009, we expect that there will be considerable value at stake for our shareholders in decisions that we take relating to resource utilisation, capital allocation and risk management. Our objective over time is to ensure that the cost of the capital we raised last November is covered many times over by the benefits of pursuing our strategy.

We must deliversolid profitability notwithstanding the global downturn. Our diversified income streams have served us well in recent years and have enabled us to absorb substantial costs from the financial crisis. We expect them to continue to do so.

We will seek to managethe composition of our profits, and capital allocation, to ensure that we optimise returns from our universal banking business model. What does this mean? It is clear to us that in the future there will be more capital in the banking system, and less leverage, particularly in capital markets businesses. This will be true at Barclays too, and will govern our approach to capital allocation and expected returns. We expect to see balance sheet utilisation by Barclays Capital fall over time, which will help us to deliver strengthening returns. We believe that the businesses that we have built from the integration of Lehman Brothers North American businesses and Barclays Capital will help in this regard, since the capital intensity of the advisory businesses in M&A and of the flow businesses in fixed income, currencies, equities and credit will be lower, once we have managed down our credit market exposures.

Outlook

We expect 2009 to be another challenging year with continuing downturns or recessions in many of the economies in which we are represented. In 2008 our profits were reduced by the impacts of substantial gross credit market losses. In 2009, we expect the impact of such credit market losses to be lower. Whilst we are confident in the relative quality of our major books of assets, we also expect the recessionary environments in the UK, Spain, South Africa and the US to increase the loan loss rates on our loans and advances.

Governments in the UK and elsewhere have taken significant measures to assist borrowers and lenders in response to the emerging recession, including reducing official interest rates. The low interest rate environment will have the impact of substantially reducing the spread generated on our retail and commercial banking deposits, particularly in the UK, but we expect the combined impact of these government measures to be positive for the economy in time.

2009 Trading

Customer and client activity levels were high in the first month of 2009, and we have had a good start to the year. In particular, the operating performance of Barclays Capital, benefiting from the now complete integration of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses, was extremely strong. The trends that lie behind the strong operating performance in Global Retail and Commercial Banking in 2008 were again observable in its performance in January.

Recent Developments

As reported in note 35 of the financial statements, in March 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision that the Newby litigation relating to Enron could not proceed against Barclays as a class action because the plaintiffs had not alleged a proper claim against Barclays. On 5th March 2009, the District Court granted summary judgment in Barclays favour on plaintiffs’ claims against Barclays. The District Court also denied plaintiffs’ request to amend the complaint to assert revised claims against Barclays on behalf of the putative class. Plaintiffs’ time in which to file an appeal regarding the District Court’s 5th March 2009 decision has not yet expired. For further information on the Newby litigation, see note 35 of the financial statements.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

11


Financial review

Consolidated balance sheet

 

Consolidated balance sheet summary

As at 31st December

 

  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004
  

2007

 

£m

  

2006

 

£m

  

2005

 

£m

  

2004

£ma

  £m  £m  £m  £m  £ma

Assets

                  

Cash and other short-term funds

  7,637  9,753  5,807  3,525  31,714  7,637  9,753  5,807  3,525

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  n/a  n/a  n/a  6,658  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  6,658

Trading portfolio and financial assets designated at fair value

  341,171  292,464  251,820  n/a  306,836  341,171  292,464  251,820  n/a

Derivative financial instruments

  248,088  138,353  136,823  n/a  984,802  248,088  138,353  136,823  n/a

Debt securities and equity shares

  n/a  n/a  n/a  141,710

Debt securities and equity securities

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  141,710

Loans and advances to banks

  40,120  30,926  31,105  80,632  47,707  40,120  30,926  31,105  80,632

Loans and advances to customers

  345,398  282,300  268,896  262,409  461,815  345,398  282,300  268,896  262,409

Available for sale financial investments

  43,072  51,703  53,497  n/a  64,976  43,072  51,703  53,497  n/a

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  183,075  174,090  160,398  n/a  130,354  183,075  174,090  160,398  n/a

Other assets

  18,800  17,198  16,011  43,247  24,776  18,800  17,198  16,011  43,247

Total assets

  1,227,361  996,787  924,357  538,181  2,052,980  1,227,361  996,787  924,357  538,181

Liabilities

                  

Deposits and items in the course of collection due to banks

  92,338  81,783  77,468  112,229  116,545  92,338  81,783  77,468  112,229

Customer accounts

  294,987  256,754  238,684  217,492  335,505  294,987  256,754  238,684  217,492

Trading portfolio and financial liabilities designated at fair value

  139,891  125,861  104,949  n/a  136,366  139,891  125,861  104,949  n/a

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  92,639  84,637  85,201  n/a  69,183  92,639  84,637  85,201  n/a

Derivative financial instruments

  248,288  140,697  137,971  n/a  968,072  248,288  140,697  137,971  n/a

Debt securities in issue

  120,228  111,137  103,328  83,842  149,567  120,228  111,137  103,328  83,842

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  169,429  136,956  121,178  n/a  182,285  169,429  136,956  121,178  n/a

Insurance contract liabilities, including unit-linked liabilities

  3,903  3,878  3,767  8,377  2,152  3,903  3,878  3,767  8,377

Subordinated liabilities

  18,150  13,786  12,463  12,277  29,842  18,150  13,786  12,463  12,277

Other liabilities

  15,032  13,908  14,918  87,200  16,052  15,032  13,908  14,918  87,200

Total liabilities

  1,194,885  969,397  899,927  521,417  2,005,569  1,194,885  969,397  899,927  521,417

Shareholders’ equity

                  

Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests

  23,291  19,799  17,426  15,870  36,618  23,291  19,799  17,426  15,870

Minority interests

  9,185  7,591  7,004  894  10,793  9,185  7,591  7,004  894

Total shareholders’ equity

  32,476  27,390  24,430  16,764  47,411  32,476  27,390  24,430  16,764

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  1,227,361  996,787  924,357  538,181  2,052,980  1,227,361  996,787  924,357  538,181

Risk weighted assets and capital ratiosb

              

Risk weighted assets

  353,476  297,833  269,148    433,302  353,878  297,833  269,148  218,601

Tier 1 ratio

  7.8%  7.7%  7.0%    8.6%  7.6%  7.7%  7.0%  7.6%

Risk asset ratio

  12.1%  11.7%  11.3%     13.6%  11.2%  11.7%  11.3%  11.5%

Selected financial statistics

            
Selected financial and other statistics  

Net asset value per ordinary share

  353p  303p  269p  246p  437p  353p  303p  269p  246p

Number of ordinary shares of Barclays PLC (in millions)

  8,372  6,601  6,535  6,490  6,454

Year-end United States Dollar exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  2.00  1.96  1.72  1.92  1.46  2.00  1.96  1.72  1.92

Year-end Euro exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  1.36  1.49  1.46  1.41  1.04  1.36  1.49  1.46  1.41

Year-end Rand exchange rate used in preparing the accounts

  13.64  13.71  10.87  10.86  13.74  13.64  13.71  10.87  10.86

The financial information above is extracted from the published accounts for the last three years. This information should be read together with, and is qualified by reference to, the accounts and Notes included in this report.

Notes

 

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bRisk weighted assets and capital ratios for 2006, 2005 and 2004 are calculated on a Basel I basis. Risk weighted assets and capital ratios for 2008 and 2007 are calculated on a Basel II basis. Capital ratios for 2004 are based on IFRS areUK GAAP and have not available.been restated as these remain as reported to the Financial Services Authority (FSA). As at 1st January 2005 the tierTier 1 ratio was 7.1% and the risk asset ratio was 11.8% reflecting the impact of IFRS including the adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4.

 

12

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

7


LOGO

Financial review

Balance sheet commentary

 

Balance sheet

Total assets increased £826bn to £2,053bn in 2008. Of this increase, £737bn was attributable to an increase in derivative assets and £124bn was attributable to increased loans and advances. All other assets declined by £35bn.

Shareholders’ equity

Shareholders’ equity, excluding minority interests increased, nearly 57% from £23bn at the end of 2007 to £37bn at the end of 2008. The main drivers for this were: equity issuances in July and September of £5.0bn; equity impact of issuing Mandatorily Convertible Notes and Warrants of £4.4bn; and after-tax profits of £5.3bn. Other reserves increased £1.6bn and we paid dividends of £2.3bn.

Capital management

At 31st December 2008, on a Basel II basis the equity Tier 1 ratio was 6.7% and the Tier 1 ratio was 9.7%, both stated on a basis to reflect conversion into ordinary shares of the Mandatorily Convertible Notes and inclusion of all innovative Tier 1 capital. Capital ratios reflect a 22% increase in risk weighted assets to £433bn during the year. This was driven by the combined impacts on risk weighted assets of the weakening of Sterling and the pro-cyclical effects of the International Basel Accord as well as lending growth in 2008. The capital ratios reflect this risk weighted asset growth and benefited from the significant increases in our capital over the course of 2008. The pro forma ratios significantly exceed the minimum levels established by the UK Financial Services Authority.

On 19th January 2009 the UK government announced, amongst other measures, an asset protection scheme under which banks may insure certain assets on their balance sheet. We are working with the Tripartite Authorities (Her Majesty’s Treasury, Bank of England and the

UK Financial Services Authority) to determine the terms on which, and the extent to which, we would wish to participate in the scheme. The procuring of such insurance could have the effect of reducing risk weighted assets. The UK Financial Services Authority also announced on 19th January 2009 a programme of work to reduce significantly the requirement for additional capital raising from the pro-cyclical effects of the International Basel Accord.

We expect a single digit percentage rate of risk weighted asset growth in 2009.

We expect to maintain the equity Tier 1 ratio and Tier 1 ratio at levels which significantly exceed the minimum requirements of the UK Financial Services Authority for the duration of the current period of financial and economic stress.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and risk weighted assets were affected by the decline in value of Sterling relative to other currencies during 2008, particularly in the last two months of the year. Over the course of the year, Sterling depreciated by 37% relative to the US Dollar and 31% relative to the Euro. We estimate that currency movements contributed £60bn to risk weighted assets.

Our hedging strategy in respect of net investments in foreign currencies is designed to mitigate against the impact of such movements on our capital ratios. In this regard, equity and Tier 1 capital ratios are hedged to approximately 75%, 30% and 100% of the movements in US Dollar, Euro and South African Rand respectively against Sterling.

The currency translation reserve increased by £3.1bn year on year. This reflected foreign exchange movements in foreign currency net investments which are largely economically hedged through preference share capital (denominated in US Dollars and Euros) that is not revalued for accounting purposes.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

13


Financial review

Balance sheet commentary

Total assets and risk weighted assetsa

2008/07

Total assets increased 67% to £2,053.0bn (2007: £1,227.4bn). Risk weighted assets increased 22% to £433.3bn (2007: £353.9bn).

UK Retail Banking total assets increased 15% to £101.4bn (31st December 2007: £88.5bn) driven by growth in mortgage balances. Risk weighted assets decreased 3% to £30.5bn (31st December 2007: £31.5bn) as lending growth mainly in high quality, low risk mortgages was more than offset in capital terms by active risk management.

Barclays Commercial Bank total assets grew 13% to £84.0bn (31st December 2007: £74.6bn) driven by higher loans and advances. Risk weighted assets increased 11% to £63.1bn (31st December 2007: £57.0bn). This was slightly lower than asset growth, reflecting a relative increase in lower risk portfolios.

Barclaycard total assets increased 40% to £30.9bn (31st December 2007: £22.1bn) reflecting increases in International assets, the acquisition of Goldfish and the appreciation of the Euro and US Dollar against Sterling. Risk weighted assets increased 35% to £27.3bn (31st December 2007: £20.2bn), driven by acquisitions, the redemption of securitisation deals and exposure growth predominantly in the US.

GRCB – Western Europe total assets grew 48% to £64.7bn (31st December 2007: £43.7bn) reflecting growth in retail mortgages, unsecured lending, commercial lending and a 31% appreciation over the year in the value of the Euro against Sterling. Risk weighted assets increased 46% to £36.5bn (31st December 2007: £25.0bn), primarily reflecting underlying lending growth and the appreciation of the Euro.

GRCB – Emerging Markets total assets grew 60% to £14.7bn (31st December 2007: £9.2bn) reflecting increases in retail and commercial lending combined with the impact of Sterling depreciation. Risk weighted assets increased 44% to £15.1bn (31st December 2007: £10.5bn), reflecting portfolio growth.

GRCB – Absa total assets increased 11% to £40.4bn (31st December 2007: £36.4bn) reflecting broad based asset growth. Risk weighted assets increased 6% to £18.8bn (31st December 2007: £17.8bn), reflecting balance sheet growth.

Barclays Capital total assets increased 94% (£789.2bn) to £1,629.1bn (31st December 2007: £839.9bn) due to an increase in derivative assets of £736.7bn, predominantly driven by significant volatility and movements in yield curves during the year, together with a substantial depreciation in Sterling against most major currencies. Risk weighted assets increased 28% to £227.4bn (31st December 2007: £178.2bn). This was driven by the depreciation in Sterling against the US Dollar and Euro, and an increase in market volatility.

Barclays Global Investors total assets decreased 20% to £71.3bn (31st December 2007: £89.2bn), mainly attributable to adverse market movements in certain asset management products recognised as investment contracts. Risk weighted assets decreased 11% to £3.9bn (31st December 2007: £4.4bn) mainly attributed to changes in the asset class mix, partially offset by the weakening of Sterling against other currencies.

Barclays Wealth total assets decreased 27% to £13.3bn (31st December 2007: £18.2bn) reflecting the sale of the closed life assurance business partially offset by strong growth in lending to high net worth and intermediary clients. Risk weighted assets increased 26% to £10.3bn (31st December 2007: £8.2bn) reflecting strong growth in lending.

Head office functions and other operations total assets decreased 46% to £3.1bn (31st December 2007: £5.7bn). Risk weighted assets decreased 64% to £0.4bn (31st December 2007: £1.1bn). The decrease in the year was mainly attributable to the increased netting of Group deferred tax assets and liabilities.


Total assets by business

   2008  2007  2006
   £m  £m  £m

UK Retail Banking

  101,384  88,477  81,693

Barclays Commercial Bank

  84,029  74,566  66,224

Barclaycard

  30,925  22,121  20,033

GRCB – Western Europe

  64,732  43,702  33,487

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  14,653  9,188  5,219

GRCB – Absa

  40,391  36,368  29,575

Barclays Capital

  1,629,117  839,850  657,922

Barclays Global Investors

  71,340  89,218  80,515

Barclays Wealth

  13,263  18,188  15,023

Head office functions and other operations

  3,146  5,683  7,096

Total assets

  2,052,980  1,227,361  996,787

Risk weighted assets by business

   2008b  2007b  2007  2006
  Basel II  Basel II  Basel I  Basel I
   £m  £m  £m  £m

UK Retail Banking

  30,491  31,463  46,059  43,020

Barclays Commercial

        

Bank

  63,081  57,040  54,325  50,302

Barclaycard

  27,316  20,199  19,690  16,873

GRCB

        

– Western Europe

  36,480  24,971  24,462  17,567

GRCB

        

– Emerging Markets

  15,080  10,484  6,050  3,255

GRCB – Absa

  18,846  17,829  22,448  19,809

Barclays Capital

  227,448  178,206  169,124  137,635

Barclays Global Investors

  3,910  4,369  1,994  1,375

Barclays Wealth

  10,300  8,216  7,692  6,077

Head office functions and other operations

  350  1,101  1,632  1,920

Total risk weighted assets

  433,302  353,878  353,476  297,833

Notes

aThe 2008/07 commentary on risk weighted assets is on a Basel II basis. The 2007/06 commentary is on a Basel I basis.

bUnder the Group’s securitisation programme, certain portfolios subject to securitisation or similar risk transfer transaction are adjusted in calculating the Group’s risk weighted assets. Previously, for pre-2008 transactions, regulatory capital adjustments were allocated to the business in proportion to their RWAs. From 1st January 2008, the regulatory capital adjustments for all transactions are allocated to the business undertaking the securitisation unless the transaction has been undertaken for the benefit of a cluster of businesses, in which case the regulatory capital adjustments are shared.

14

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

2007/06

Total assets increased 23% to £1,227.4bn (2006: £996.8bn). Risk weighted assets increased 19% to £353.5bn (2006: £297.8bn). Loans and advances to customers that have been securitised increased £4.3bn to £28.7bn (2006: £24.4bn).

UK Retail Banking total assets increased 8% to £88.5bn (2006: £81.7bn). This was mainly attributable to growth in mortgage balances. Risk weighted assets increased by 7% to £46.1bn (2006: £43.0bn) with growth in mortgages partially offset by an increase in securitised balances and other reductions.

Barclays Commercial Bank total assets grew 13% to £74.6bn (2006: £66.2bn) driven by good growth across lending products. Risk weighted assets increased 8% to £54.3bn (2006: £50.3bn), reflecting asset growth partially offset by increased regulatory netting and an increase in securitised balances.

Barclaycard total assets increased 11% to £22.1bn (2006: £20.0bn). Risk weighted assets increased 17% to £19.7bn (2006: £16.9bn), primarily reflecting the increase in total assets, redemption of securitisation transactions, partially offset by changes to the treatment of regulatory associates and the sale of part of the Monument card portfolio.

GRCB – Western Europe total assets grew 31% to £43.7bn (2006: £33.5bn). This growth was mainly driven by increases in retail mortgages and unsecured lending. Risk weighted assets increased 39% to £24.5bn (2006: £17.6bn), reflecting asset growth.

GRCB – Emerging Markets total assets grew by 76% to £9.2bn (2006: £5.2bn). This growth was driven by increases in unsecured lending. Risk weighted assets increased 86% to £6.1bn (2006: £3.3bn), reflecting asset growth.

GRCB – Absa total assets increased 23% to £36.4bn (2006: £29.6bn), primarily driven by increases in mortgages, credit cards and commercial property finance. Risk weighted assets increased 13% to £22.4bn (2006: £19.8bn), reflecting balance sheet growth.

Barclays Capital total assets rose 28% to £839.9bn (2006: £657.9bn). Derivative assets increased £109.7bn primarily due to movements across a range of market indices. This was accompanied by a corresponding increase in derivative liabilities. The increase in non-derivative assets reflects an expansion of the business across a number of asset classes, combined with an increase in drawn leveraged loan positions and mortgage-related assets. Risk weighted assets increased 23% to £169.1bn (2006: £137.6bn) reflecting growth in fixed income, equities and credit derivatives.

Barclays Global Investors total assets increased 11% to £89.2bn (2006: £80.5bn), mainly attributable to growth in certain asset management products recognised as investment contracts. The majority of total assets relates to asset management products with equal and offsetting balances reflected within liabilities to customers. Risk weighted assets increased 45% to £2.0bn (2006: £1.4bn) mainly attributable to overall growth in the balance sheet and the mix of securities lending activity.

Barclays Wealth total assets increased 21% to £18.2bn (2006: £15.0bn) reflecting strong growth in lending to high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients. Risk weighted assets increased 27% to £7.7bn (2006: £6.1bn) reflecting the increase in lending.

Head office functions and other operations total assets decreased 20% to £5.7bn (2006: £7.1bn). Risk weighted assets decreased 15% to £1.6bn (2006: £1.9bn).

Adjusted gross leverage

The adjusted gross leverage ratio is defined as the multiple of adjusted total tangible assets over total qualifying Tier 1 capital. Adjusted total tangible assets are total assets less derivative counterparty netting, assets under management on the balance sheet, settlement balances, goodwill and tangible assets. Tier 1 capital is defined by the UK FSA. Adjusted gross leverage is a non-IFRS measure. However, Barclays management believes that this measure provides valuable information to readers of Barclays financial statements because there will be more capital and less leverage in the banking system, as a key measure of stability, which is consistent with the views of regulators and investors. However, this measure is not a substitute for IFRS measures and readers should consider IFRS measures as well.

Volatility in reference rates and yield curves used for pricing have led to significantly higher values for derivative assets and liabilities. Limited netting is permitted under IFRS, even for receivables and payables with the same counterparty where there are contractually agreed netting arrangements. Derivative assets and liabilities would be £917bn (2007: £215bn) lower than reported under IFRS if netting were permitted for assets and liabilities with the same counterparty or for which we hold cash collateral.

Assets and liabilities also include amounts held under investment contracts with third parties of a further £69bn as at 31st December 2008 (2007: £93bn). These constitute asset management products offered to institutional pension funds which are required to be recognised as financial instruments. Changes in value in these assets are entirely to the account of the beneficial owner of the asset.

Excluding these items, settlement balances, goodwill and intangible assets, our adjusted total tangible assets were £1,026bn at 31st December 2008 (2007: £888bn). On this basis we define adjusted gross leverage, being the multiple of adjusted total tangible assets over total qualifying Tier 1 capital. At 31st December 2008 adjusted gross leverage was 28x (2007: 33x).

We expect adjusted gross leverage to improve further over time.

Adjusted gross leverage 
    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

 
Total assets  2,052,980  1,227,361 
Counterparty net/ collateralised derivatives  (917,074) (215,485)
Financial assets designated at fair value and associated cash balances – held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts  (69,183) (92,639)
Net settlement balances  (29,786) (22,459)
Goodwill and intangible assets  (10,402) (8,296)
Adjusted total tangible assets  1,026,535  888,482 
Total qualifying Tier 1 capital  37,250  26,743 
Adjusted gross leverage  28  33 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

15


Financial review

Balance sheet commentary

Total shareholders’ equity

2008/07

Total shareholders’ equity increased £14,935m to £47,411m (2007: £32,476m).

Called up share capital comprises 8,372 million ordinary shares of 25p each (2007: 6,600 million ordinary shares of 25p each and 1 million staff shares of £1 each).

Retained earnings increased £3,238m to £24,208m (2007: £20,970m). Profit attributable to the equity holders of the parent of £4,382m and the proceeds of capital raising of £1,410m were partially offset by dividends paid to shareholders of £2,344m. Other equity of £3,652m represents the issue of Mandatorily Convertible Notes, which will convert into ordinary shares by June 2009.

Movements in other reserves, except the capital redemption reserve, reflect the relevant amounts recorded in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense on page 206.

Minority interests increased £1,608m to £10,793m (2007: £9,185m). The increase primarily reflects a preference share issuance by Barclays Bank PLC of £1,345m.

The Group’s authority to buy-back equity shares was renewed at the 2008 AGM.

2007/06

Total shareholders’ equity increased £5,086m to £32,476m (2006: £27,390m).

Called up share capital comprises 6,600 million (2006: 6,535 million) ordinary shares of 25p each and 1 million (2006: 1 million) staff shares of £1 each. Called up share capital increased by £17m representing the nominal value of shares issued to Temasek Holdings, China Development Bank (CDB) and employees under share option plans largely offset by a reduction in nominal value arising from share buy-backs. Share premium

reduced by £5,762m; the reclassification of £7,223m to retained earnings resulting from the High Court approved cancellation of share premium was partly offset by additional premium arising on the issuance to CDB and on employee options. The capital redemption reserve increased by £75m representing the nominal value of the share buy-backs.

Retained earnings increased by £8,801m. Increases primarily arose from profit attributable to equity holders of the parent of £4,417m, the reclassification of share premium of £7,223m and the proceeds of the Temasek issuance in excess of nominal value of £941m. Reductions primarily arose from external dividends paid of £2,079m and the total cost of share repurchases of £1,802m.

Movements in other reserves, except the capital redemption reserve, reflect the relevant amounts recorded in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense on page 206.

Minority interests increased £1,594m to £9,185m (2006: £7,591m). The increase was primarily driven by preference share issuances of £1,322m and an increase in the minority interest in Absa of £225m.

The Group’s authority to buy-back equity shares was renewed at the 2007 AGM.

Barclays Bank PLC

Preference shares issued by Barclays Bank PLC are included within share capital and share premium in the Barclays Bank PLC Group but represent minority interests in the Barclays PLC Group. Certain issuances of reserve capital instruments and capital notes by Barclays Bank PLC are included within other shareholders’ equity in the Barclays Bank PLC Group but represent minority interests in Barclays PLC Group. The Mandatorily Convertible Notes issued pursuant to the equity issuances by Barclays PLC represent financial liabilities in the financial statements of Barclays Bank PLC and have not been included in shareholders’ equity.


 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

    2008
£m
      2007
£m
      

2006

£m

 
Barclays PLC Group        
Called up share capital  2,093    1,651    1,634 
Share premium account  4,045    56    5,818 
Other equity  3,652         
Available for sale reserve  (1,190)        132 
Cash flow hedging reserve  132       26       (230)
Capital redemption reserve  394    384    309 
Other capital reserve  617    617    617 
Currency translation reserve  2,840    (307)   (438)
Other reserves  2,793    874    390 
Retained earnings  24,208    20,970    12,169 
Less: Treasury shares  (173)    (260)    (212)
Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests  36,618    23,291    19,799 
Minority interests  10,793     9,185     7,591 
Total shareholders’ equity  47,411     32,476     27,390 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

    2008
£m
      2007
£m
      2006
£m
 
Barclays Bank PLC Group        
Called up share capital  2,398    2,382    2,363 
Share premium account  12,060    10,751    9,452 
Available for sale reserve  (1,249)   111       184 
Cash flow hedging reserve  132       26    (230)
Currency translation reserve  2,840    (307)   (438)
Other reserves  1,723    (170)   (484)
Other shareholders’ equity  2,564    2,687    2,534 
Retained earnings  22,457     14,222     11,556 
Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests  41,202    29,872    25,421 
Minority interests  2,372     1,949     1,685 
Total shareholders’ equity  43,574     31,821     27,106 

16

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Capital management

Capital resources

Tier 1 capital increased by £10.5bn during the year, driven by issues of ordinary shares (£5.2bn), other capital issuances (£4.3bn), retained profits (£2.0bn) and exchange rate movements (£3.2bn). These movements were partially offset by an increase in intangible assets (£1.3bn), innovative Tier 1 capital in excess of regulatory limits being reclassified as Tier 2 capital (£1.3bn) and the reversal of gains on own credit, net of tax (£1.2bn).

Tier 2 capital increased by £8.5bn due to issuance of loan capital (£3.6bn) net of redemptions (£1.1bn), inclusion of innovative capital in excess of the Tier 1 limits (£1.3bn), increases in collective impairment (£1.2bn) and exchange rate movements (£3.9bn).

The Mandatorily Convertible Notes (MCNs) issued during the year (£4.1bn) will qualify as equity capital from the date of their conversion, on or before 30th June 2009.

All capital issuance referred to above is stated gross of issue costs.

Basel I transitional floor

Barclays commenced calculating capital requirements under the Basel II capital framework from 1st January 2008. The Group manages its businesses and reports capital requirements on a Basel II basis. During the transition period for the adoption of Basel II, banks’ capital requirements may not fall below a transitional floor. In 2008 this floor was 90% of adjusted Basel I capital requirements. As at 31st December 2008, the Group had additional capital requirements under the transitional floor rules of £1.5bn. The Group’s total capital resources of £58.7bn exceeded its capital requirements taking into account the transitional floor by £22.5bn. On 1st January 2009, the transitional floor reduced to 80% of adjusted Basel I capital requirements and there were no additional capital requirements resulting from its application.


Capital ratios

   Basel II  Basel II  Basel I  Basel I 
   2008  2007  2007  2006 
   Barclays

PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

Bank PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

Bank PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

Bank PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

PLC

Group

 

 

 

 Barclays

Bank PLC

Group

 

 

 

Capital ratios

  %  %  %  %  %  %  %  % 

Tier 1 ratio

  8.6  8.6  7.6  7.3  7.8  7.5  7.7  7.5 

Risk asset ratio

  13.6  13.5  11.2  11.0  12.1  11.8  11.7  11.5 
  

Risk weighted assets

  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Credit risk

  266,912  266,912  244,474  244,469  265,264  265,259  233,630  233,630 

Counterparty risk

  70,902  70,902  41,203  41,203  51,947  51,947  33,912  33,912 

Market risk

  65,372  65,372  39,812  39,812  36,265  36,265  30,291  30,291 

Operational risk

  30,116  30,116  28,389  28,389  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a 

Total risk weighted assets

  433,302  433,302  353,878  353,873  353,476  353,471  297,833  297,833 

Total net capital resources

 

         

 

Capital resources (as defined for regulatory purposes)

                         
    £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Tier 1

           

Called up share capital

  2,093  2,338  1,651  2,382  1,651  2,382  1,634  2,363 

Eligible reserves

  31,156  36,639  22,939  26,028  22,526  25,615  19,608  21,700 

Minority interests

  13,915  8,038  10,551  5,857  10,551  5,857  7,899  4,528 

Tier One Notes

  1,086  1,086  899  899  899  899  909  909 

Less: Intangible assets

  (9,964) (9,964) (8,191) (8,191) (8,191) (8,191) (7,045) (7,045)

Less: Deductions from Tier 1 capital

  (1,036) (1,036) (1,106) (1,106) (28) (28)    

Total qualifying Tier 1 capital

  37,250  37,101  26,743  25,869  27,408  26,534  23,005  22,455 

Tier 2

           

Revaluation reserves

  26  26  26  26  26  26  25  25 

Available for sale equity

  122  122  295  295  295  295  221  221 

Collectively assessed impairment allowances

  1,654  1,654  440  440  2,619  2,619  2,556  2,556 

Minority interests

  607  607  442  442  442  442  451  451 

Qualifying subordinated liabilities

           

Undated loan capital

  6,745  6,768  3,191  3,191  3,191  3,191  3,180  3,180 

Dated loan capital

  14,215  14,215  10,578  10,578  10,578  10,578  7,603  7,603 

Less: Deductions from Tier 2 capital

  (1,036) (1,036) (1,106) (1,106) (28) (28)    

Total qualifying Tier 2 capital

  22,333  22,356  13,866  13,866  17,123  17,123  14,036  14,036 

Less: Regulatory deductions

           

Investments not consolidated for supervisory purposes

  (403) (403) (633) (633) (633) (633) (982) (982)

Other deductions

  (453) (561) (193) (193) (1,256) (1,256) (1,348) (1,348)

Total deductions

  (856) (964) (826) (826) (1,889) (1,889) (2,330) (2,330)

Total net capital resources

  58,727  58,493  39,783  38,909  42,642  41,768  34,711  34,161 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

17


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Deposits and short-term borrowings

Deposits

Deposits include deposits from banks and customers accounts.

    Average: year ended 31st December
   2008

£m

  2007

£m

  2006

£m

Deposits from banks

      

Customers in the United Kingdom

  14,003  15,321  12,832

Customers outside the

      

United Kingdom:

      

Other European Union

  38,210  33,162  30,116

United States

  15,925  6,656  7,352

Africa

  3,110  4,452  4,140

Rest of the World

  36,599  36,626  35,013

Total deposits from banks

  107,847  96,217  89,453

Customer accounts

      

Customers in the United Kingdom

  206,020  187,249  173,767

Customers outside the

      

United Kingdom:

      

Other European Union

  30,909  23,696  22,448

United States

  31,719  21,908  17,661

Africa

  35,692  29,855  23,560

Rest of the World

  27,653  23,032  19,992

Customer accounts

  331,993  285,740  257,428

Deposits from banks in offices in the United Kingdom received from non- residents amounted to £63,284m (2007: £45,162m).

    Year ended 31st December
   2008

£m

  2007

£m

  2006

£m

Customer accounts

  335,505  294,987  256,754

In offices in the United Kingdom:

      

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest free

  41,351  33,400  25,650

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest bearing

  20,898  32,047  31,769

Savings accounts

  68,335  70,682  62,745

Other time deposits – retail

  33,785  36,123  36,110

Other time deposits – wholesale

  74,417  65,726  53,733

Total repayable in offices in the United Kingdom

  238,786  237,978  210,007

In offices outside the United Kingdom:

      

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest free

  4,803  2,990  2,169

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest bearing

  15,463  11,570  17,626

Savings accounts

  7,673  3,917  3,041

Other time deposits

  68,780  38,532  23,911

Total repayable in offices outside the United Kingdom

  96,719  57,009  46,747

Customer accounts deposits in offices in the United Kingdom received from non-residents amounted to £61,714m (2007: £49,179m).

Short-term borrowings

Short-term borrowings include deposits from banks, commercial paper and negotiable certificates of deposit.

Deposits from banks

Deposits from banks are taken from a wide range of counterparties and generally have maturities of less than one year.

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Year-end balance

  114,910  90,546  79,562

Average balance

  107,847  96,217  89,453

Maximum balance

  139,836  109,586  97,165

Average interest rate during year

  3.6%  4.1%  4.2%

Year-end interest rate

  2.3%  4.0%  4.3%

Commercial paper

Commercial paper is issued by the Group, mainly in the United States, generally in denominations of not less than US$100,000, with maturities of up to 270 days.

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Year-end balance

  27,692  23,451  26,546

Average balance

  24,668  26,229  29,740

Maximum balance

  27,792  30,736  31,859

Average interest rate during year

  4.4%  5.4%  4.4%

Year-end interest rate

  4.2%  5.2%  5.0%

Negotiable certificates of deposit

Negotiable certificates of deposits are issued mainly in the United Kingdom and United States, generally in denominations of not less than US$100,000.

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Year-end balance

  61,332  58,401  52,800

Average balance

  55,122  55,394  49,327

Maximum balance

  67,715  62,436  60,914

Average interest rate during year

  4.4%  5.1%  5.3%

Year-end interest rate

  4.1%  5.0%  5.1%

18

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Commitments and contractual obligations

Commercial commitments include guarantees, contingent liabilities and standby facilities.

Commercial commitments

   

2008

Amount of commitment expiration per period

    

Less than

one year

£m

  

Between

one to
three years

£m

  

Between

three to
five years

£m

  

After
five years

£m

  

Total
amounts
committed

£m

Acceptances and endorsements

  576  6  3    585

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  7,272  2,529  1,781  4,070  15,652

Securities lending arrangements

  38,290        38,290

Other contingent liabilities

  7,989  1,604  372  1,818  11,783

Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions

  770  88  1    859

Forward asset purchases and forward deposits placed

  50  241      291

Standby facilities, credit lines and other

  195,035  29,666  26,150  8,815  259,666
   

2007

Amount of commitment expiration per period

    

Less than
one year

£m

  

Between

one to
three years

£m

  

Between

three to

five years

£m

  

After

five years

£m

  

Total
amounts
committed

£m

Acceptances and endorsements

  365        365

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  6,417  2,711  1,971  1,874  12,973

Securities lending arrangements

  22,719        22,719

Other contingent liabilities

  6,594  1,556  416  1,151  9,717

Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions

  401  121      522

Forward asset purchases and forward deposits placed

  283        283

Standby facilities, credit lines and other

  136,457  17,039  28,127  10,211  191,834

 

Contractual obligations include debt securities, operating lease and purchase obligations.

 

 

Contractual obligations

   

2008

Payments due by period

    

Less than
one year

£m

  

Between

one to

three years

£m

  

Between
three to

five years

£m

  

After

five years

£m

  

Total

£m

Long-term debt

  108,172  24,701  10,855  22,008  165,736

Operating lease obligations

  280  690  785  2,745  4,500

Purchase obligations

  214  225  61  20  520

Total

  108,666  25,616  11,701  24,773  170,756
   

2007

Payments due by period

    

Less than

one year

£m

  

Between

one to

three years

£m

  

Between

three to

five years

£m

  

After

five years

£m

  

Total

£m

Long-term debt

  90,201  13,558  8,630  19,358  131,747

Operating lease obligations

  197  755  610  2,225  3,787

Purchase obligations

  141  186  27  6  360

Total

  90,539  14,499  9,267  21,589  135,894

The long-term debt does not include undated loan capital of £13,673m (2007: £6,631m).

Further information on the contractual maturity of the Group’s assets and liabilities is given in Note 49.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

19


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Securities

The following table analyses the book value of securities which are carried at fair value.

   2008  2007  2006
    

Book value

£m

  

Amortised
cost

£m

  

Book value

£m

  

Amortised
cost

£m

  

Book value

£m

  

Amortised
cost

£m

Investment securities – available for sale

            

Debt securities:

            

United Kingdom government

  1,238  1,240  78  81  758  761

Other government

  11,456  11,338  7,383  7,434  12,587  12,735

Other public bodies

  2,373  2,379  634  632  280  277

Mortgage and asset backed securities

  3,510  4,126  1,367  1,429  1,706  1,706

Bank and building society certificates of deposit

  10,478  10,535  3,028  3,029  6,686  6,693

Corporate and other issuers

  29,776  30,363  26,183  26,219  25,895  25,857

Equity securities

  2,142  1,814  1,676  1,418  1,371  1,047

Investment securities – available for sale

  60,973  61,795  40,349  40,242  49,283  49,076

Other securities – held for trading

            

Debt securities:

            

United Kingdom government

  6,955  n/a  3,832  n/a  4,986  n/a

Other government

  50,727  n/a  51,104  n/a  46,845  n/a

Mortgage and asset backed securities

  30,748  n/a  37,038  n/a  29,606  n/a

Bank and building society certificates of deposit

  7,518  n/a  17,751  n/a  14,159  n/a

Corporate and other issuers

  52,738  n/a  43,053  n/a  44,980  n/a

Equity securities

  30,535  n/a  36,307  n/a  31,548  n/a

Other securities – held for trading

  179,221  n/a  189,085  n/a  172,124  n/a

Investment debt securities include government securities held as part of the Group’s treasury management portfolio for asset and liability, liquidity and regulatory purposes and are for use on a continuing basis in the activities of the Group. In addition, the Group holds as investments listed and unlisted corporate securities.

Bank and building society certificates of deposit are freely negotiable and have original maturities of up to five years, but are typically held for shorter periods.

In addition to UK government securities shown above, at 31st December 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Group held the following government securities which exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.

Government securities

   2008  2007  2006
    

Book value

£m

  

Book value

£m

  

Book value

£m

United States

  17,165  15,156  18,343

Japan

  9,092  9,124  15,505

Germany

  5,832  5,136  4,741

France

  4,091  3,538  4,336

Italy

  6,091  5,090  3,419

Spain

  3,647  3,674  2,859

Maturities and yield of available for sale debt securities

   Maturing within
one year
  Maturing after one but
within five years
  Maturing after five but
within ten years
  Maturing after
ten years
  Total
    

Amount

£m

  

Yield

%

  

Amount

£m

  

Yield

%

  

Amount

£m

  

Yield

%

  

Amount

£m

  

Yield

%

  

Amount

£m

  

Yield

%

Government

  3,096  6.0  5,410  5.1  1,694  1.1  2,493  0.9  12,693  4.0

Other public bodies

  832  1.9  1,526  0.9  1    14  4.7  2,373  1.3

Other issuers

  21,749  4.3  9,692�� 3.8  7,702  4.4  4,622  5.7  43,765  4.3

Total book value

  25,677  4.4  16,628  3.9  9,397  3.8  7,129  4.0  58,831  4.1

The yield for each range of maturities is calculated by dividing the annualised interest income prevailing at 31st December 2008 by the fair value of securities held at that date.

20

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Average balance sheet

Average balance sheet and net interest income (year ended 31st December)

  2008  2007  2006
   Average
balance a
£m
 
 
 
 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average
rate

%

  Average
balance a

£m

 
 

 

 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average
rate

%

  Average
balance a

£m

 
 

 

 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average
rate

%

Assets

            

Loans and advances to banksb:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  38,913  1,453  3.7  29,431  1,074  3.6  18,401  647  3.5

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  14,379  419  2.9  12,262  779  6.4  12,278  488  4.0

Loans and advances to customersb:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  249,081  13,714  5.5  205,707  13,027  6.3  184,392  11,247  6.1

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  116,284  9,208  7.9  88,212  6,733  7.6  77,615  4,931  6.4

Lease receivables:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  4,827  281  5.8  4,822  283  5.9  5,266  300  5.7

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  6,543  752  11.5  5,861  691  11.8  6,162  595  9.7

Financial investments:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  35,844  1,654  4.6  37,803  2,039  5.4  41,125  1,936  4.7

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  10,450  697  6.7  14,750  452  3.1  14,191  830  5.8

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  207,521  8,768  4.2  211,709  9,644  4.6  166,713  6,136  3.7

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  128,250  4,450  3.5  109,012  5,454  5.0  100,416  5,040  5.0

Trading portfolio assets:

            

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  107,626  4,948  4.6  120,691  5,926  4.9  106,148  4,166  3.9

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  128,287  5,577  4.3  57,535  3,489  6.1  61,370  2,608  4.2

Total average interest earning assets

  1,048,005  51,921  5.0  897,795  49,591  5.5  794,077  38,924  4.9

Impairment allowances/provisions

  (5,749)    (4,435)    (3,565)  

Non-interest earning assets

  711,856     422,834     310,949   

Total average assets and interest income

  1,754,112  51,921  3.0  1,316,194  49,591  3.8  1,101,461  38,924  3.5

Percentage of total average interest earning assets in offices outside the United Kingdom

  38.6%     32.0%     34.3%   

Total average interest earning assets related to:

            

Interest income

   51,921  5.0   49,591  5.5   38,924  4.9

Interest expense

   (38,181) 3.6   (37,892) 4.2   (30,385) 3.8
      13,740  1.4     11,699  1.3     8,539  1.1

Notes

aAverage balances are based upon daily averages for most UK banking operations and monthly averages elsewhere.

bLoans and advances to customers and banks include all doubtful lendings, including non-accrual lendings. Interest receivable on such lendings has been included to the extent to which either cash payments have been received or interest has been accrued in accordance with the income recognition policy of the Group.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

21


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Average balance sheet

Average balance sheet and net interest income (year ended 31st December)

  2008  2007  2006
   Average
balance a
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average
rate

%

  Average
balance a
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average
rate

%

  Average
balance 
a
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average
rate

%

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

                  

Deposits by banks:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  70,272  2,780  4.0  63,902  2,511  3.9  62,236  2, 464  4.0

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  32,172  956  3.0  27,596  1,225  4.4  23,438  1,137  4.9

Customer accounts:

                  

demand deposits:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  24,333  910  3.7  29,110  858  2.9  25,397  680  2.7

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  14,902  572  3.8  13,799  404  2.9  10,351  254  2.5

Customer accounts:

                  

savings deposits:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  71,062  2,143  3.0  55,064  2,048  3.7  57,734  1,691  2.9

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  7,033  413  5.9  4,848  128  2.6  3,124  74  2.4

Customer accounts:

                  

other time deposits – retail:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  32,283  1,523  4.7  30,578  1,601  5.2  34,865  1,548  4.4

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  20,055  1,350  6.7  12,425  724  5.8  8,946  482  5.4

Customer accounts:

                  

other time deposits – wholesale:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  60,574  2,362  3.9  52,147  2,482  4.8  45,930  1,794  3.9

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  31,300  2,094  6.7  24,298  1,661  6.8  23,442  1,191  5.1

Debt securities in issue:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  41,014  1,920  4.7  41,552  2,053  4.9  47,216  1,850  3.9

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  80,768  3,734  4.6  94,271  5,055  5.4  74,125  3,686  5.0

Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities principally:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  22,912  1,435  6.3  12,972  763  5.9  13,686  777  5.7

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  203,967  8,445  4.1  169,272  7,616  4.5  141,862  5,080  3.6

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  177,883  2,800  1.6  118,050  5,051  4.3  86,693  4,311  5.0

Trading portfolio liabilities:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  56,675  2,657  4.7  47,971  2,277  4.7  49,892  2,014  4.0

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  62,239  2,087  3.4  29,838  1,435  4.8  39,064  1,352  3.5

Total average interest bearing liabilities

  1,009,444  38,181  3.8  827,693  37,892  4.6  748,001  30,385  4.1

Interest free customer deposits:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  40,439      34,109      27,549    

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  3,089      3,092      2,228    

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

  664,458      421,473      297,816    

Minority and other interests and shareholders’ equity

  36,682        29,827        25,867      

Total average liabilities, shareholders’ equity and interest expense

  1,754,112  38,181  2.2  1,316,194  37,892  2.9  1,101,461  30,385  2.8

Percentage of total average interest bearing non-capital liabilities in offices outside the United Kingdom

  42.2%        39.4%        36.1%      

Note

aAverage balances are based upon daily averages for most UK banking operations and monthly averages elsewhere.

22

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Changes in net interest income – volume and rate analysis

The following tables allocate changes in net interest income between changes in volume and changes in interest rates for the last two years. Volume and rate variances have been calculated on the movement in the

average balances and the change in the interest rates on average interest earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. Where variances have arisen from changes in both volumes and interest rates, these have been allocated proportionately between the two.


   

2008/2007 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

  

2007/2006 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

  

2006/2005 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

    Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  

Rate

£m

  Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  Rate
£m
  Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  Rate
£m

Interest receivable

          

Loans and advances to banks:

          

– in offices in the UK

  379  354  25  427  402  25  193  121  72

– in offices outside the UK

  (360) 117  (477) 291  (1) 292  85  46  39
   19  471  (452) 718  401  317  278  167  111

Loans and advances to customers:

          

– in offices in the UK

  687  2,525  (1,838) 1,780  1,337  443  1,018  726  292

– in offices outside the UK

  2,475  2,214  261  1,802  728  1,074  1,956  1,695  261
   3,162  4,739  (1,577) 3,582  2,065  1,517  2,974  2,421  553

Lease receivables:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (2)   (2) (17) (26) 9  (48) (70) 22

– in offices outside the UK

  61  79  (18) 96  (30) 126  478  413  65
   59  79  (20) 79  (56) 135  430  343  87

Financial investments:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (385) (102) (283) 103  (165) 268  181  (85) 266

– in offices outside the UK

  245  (163) 408  (378) 32  (410) 363  202  161
   (140) (265) 125  (275) (133) (142) 544  117  427

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (876) (188) (688) 3,508  1,865  1,643  1,519  324  1,195

– in offices outside the UK

  (1,004) 855  (1,859) 414  430  (16) 2,316  254  2,062
   (1,880) 667  (2,547) 3,922  2,295  1,627  3,835  578  3,257

Trading portfolio assets:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (978) (616) (362) 1,760  621  1,139  1,456  907  549

– in offices outside the UK

  2,088  3,303  (1,215) 881  (172) 1,053  492  151  341
   1,110  2,687  (1,577) 2,641  449  2,192  1,948  1,058  890

Total interest receivable:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (1,175) 1,973  (3,148) 7,561  4,034  3,527  4,319  1,923  2,396

– in offices outside the UK

  3,505  6,405  (2,900) 3,106  987  2,119  5,690  2,761  2,929
   2,330  8,378  (6,048) 10,667  5,021  5,646  10,009  4,684  5,325

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

23


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Average balance sheet

Changes in net interest income – volume and rate analysis

   

2008/2007 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

  

2007/2006 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

  

2006/2005 Change due

to increase/

(decrease) in:

 
    Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  

Rate

£m

  Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  

Rate

£m

  Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
  

Rate

£m

 

Interest payable

          

Deposits by banks:

          

– in offices in the UK

  269  252  17  47  66  (19) 799  247  552 

– in offices outside the UK

  (269) 181  (450) 88  190  (102) 432  52  380 
     433  (433) 135  256  (121) 1,231  299  932 

Customer accounts – demand deposits:

          

– in offices in the UK

  52  (155) 207  178  105  73  170  68  102 

– in offices outside the UK

  168  34  134  150  95  55  166  80  86 
   220  (121) 341  328  200  128  336  148  188 

Customer accounts – savings deposits:

          

– in offices in the UK

  95  527  (432) 357  (81) 438  121  152  (31)

– in offices outside the UK

  285  77  208  54  45  9  35  28  7 
   380  604  (224) 411  (36) 447  156  180  (24)

Customer accounts – other time deposits – retail:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (78) 86  (164) 53  (204) 257  78  41  37 

– in offices outside the UK

  626  500  126  242  200  42  222  125  97 
   548  586  (38) 295  (4) 299  300  166  134 

Customer accounts – other time deposits – wholesale:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (120) 367  (487) 688  263  425  603  129  474 

– in offices outside the UK

  433  469  (36) 470  45  425  601  550  51 
   313  836  (523) 1,158  308  850  1,204  679  525 

Debt securities in issue:

          

– in offices in the UK

  (133) (26) (107) 203  (240) 443  219  22  197 

– in offices outside the UK

  (1,321) (673) (648) 1,369  1,063  306  1,991  850  1,141 
   (1,454) (699) (755) 1,572  823  749  2,210  872  1,338 

Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities principally in offices in the UK

  672  620  52  (14) (41) 27  172  135  37 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

          

– in offices in the UK

  829  1,471  (642) 2,536  1,090  1,446  1,446  329  1,117 

– in offices outside the UK

  (2,251) 1,840  (4,091) 740  1,402  (662) 1,932  200  1,732 
   (1,422) 3,311  (4,733) 3,276  2,492  784  3,378  529  2,849 

Trading portfolio liabilities:

          

– in offices in the UK

  380  408  (28) 263  (80) 343  277  222  55 

– in offices outside the UK

  652  1,189  (537) 83  (366) 449  156  85  71 
   1,032  1,597  (565) 346  (446) 792  433  307  126 

Total interest payable:

          

– in offices in the UK

  1,966  3,550  (1,584) 4,311  878  3,433  3,885  1,345  2,540 

– in offices outside the UK

  (1,677) 3,617  (5,294) 3,196  2,674  522  5,535  1,970  3,565 
   289  7,167  (6,878) 7,507  3,552  3,955  9,420  3,315  6,105 

Movement in net interest income

Increase/(decrease) in interest receivable

  2,330  8,378  (6,048) 10,667  5,021  5,646  10,009  4,684  5,325 

(Increase)/decrease in interest payable

  (289) (7,167) 6,878  (7,507) (3,552) (3,955) (9,420) (3,315) (6,105)
   2,041  1,211  830  3,160  1,469  1,691  589  1,369  (780)

24

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Off-balance sheet arrangements

In the ordinary course of business and primarily to facilitate client transactions, the Group enters into transactions which may involve the use of off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities (SPEs). These arrangements include the provision of guarantees, loan commitments, retained interests in assets which have been transferred to an unconsolidated SPE or obligations arising from the Group’s involvements with such SPEs.

Guarantees

The Group issues guarantees on behalf of its customers. In the majority of cases, the Group will hold collateral against the exposure, have a right of recourse to the customer or both. In addition, the Group issues guarantees on its own behalf. The main types of guarantees provided are: financial guarantees given to banks and financial institutions on behalf of customers to secure loans; overdrafts; and other banking facilities, including stock borrowing indemnities and standby letters of credit. Other guarantees provided include performance guarantees, advance payment guarantees, tender guarantees, guarantees to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and retention guarantees. The nominal principal amount of contingent liabilities with off-balance sheet risk is set out in Note 34 and in the table on page 33.

Loan commitments

The Group enters into commitments to lend to its customers subject to certain conditions. Such loan commitments are made either for a fixed period or are cancellable by the Group subject to notice conditions. Information on loan commitments and similar facilities is set out in Note 34 and in the table on page 33.

Special purpose entities

Transactions entered into by the Group may involve the use of SPEs.

SPEs are entities that are created to accomplish a narrow and well defined objective. There are often specific restrictions or limits around their on-going activities.

Transactions with SPEs take a number of forms, including:

The provision of financing to fund asset purchases, or commitments to provide finance for future purchases.

Derivative transactions to provide investors in the SPE with a specified exposure.

The provision of liquidity or backstop facilities which may be drawn upon if the SPE experiences future funding difficulties.

Direct investment in the notes issued by SPEs.

Depending on the nature of the Group’s resulting exposure, it may consolidate the SPE on to the Group’s balance sheet. The consolidation of SPEs is considered at inception, based on the arrangements in place and the assessed risk exposures at that time. In accordance with IFRS, SPEs are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the Group and the entity indicates control. Potential indicators of control include, amongst others, an assessment of the Group’s exposure to the risks and benefits of the SPE. The initial consolidation analysis is revisited at a later date if:

(i)the Group acquires additional interests in the entity;

(ii)the contractual arrangements of the entity are amended such that the relative exposures to risks and rewards change; or if

(iii)the Group acquires control over the main operating and financial decisions of the entity.

A number of the Group’s transactions have recourse only to the assets of unconsolidated SPEs. Typically, the majority of the exposure to these assets is borne by third parties and the Group’s risk is mitigated through over-collateralisation, unwind features and other protective measures. The Group’s involvement with unconsolidated third party conduits, collateralised debt obligations and structured investment vehicles is described further below.

Collateralised debt obligations (CDOs)

The Group has structured and underwritten CDOs. At inception, the Group’s exposure principally takes the form of a liquidity facility provided to support future funding difficulties or cash shortfalls in the vehicles. If required by the vehicle, the facility is drawn with the amount advanced included within loans and advances in the balance sheet. Upon an event of default or other triggering event, the Group may acquire control of a CDO and, therefore, be required to fully consolidate the vehicle for accounting purposes. The potential for transactions to hit default triggers before the end of 2009 has been assessed and is included in the determination of £1,763m impairment charges and other credit provisions in relation to ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures for the year ended 31st December 2008.

The Group’s exposure to ABS CDO Super Senior positions before hedging was £3,104m as at 31st December 2008. This represents the Group’s exposure to High Grade CDOs, stated net of write-downs and charges. These facilities are fully drawn and included within loans and advances on the balance sheet. The undrawn mezzanine facilities that were in place as at 31st December 2007 relate to CDOs that have been consolidated during the period.

Collateral

The collateral underlying unconsolidated CDOs comprised 78% residential mortgage backed securities, 3% non-residential asset backed securities and 19% in other categories (a proportion of which will be backed by residential mortgage collateral).

The remaining Weighted Average Life (WAL) of all collateral is 5.1 years. The combined Net Asset Value (NAV) for all of the CDOs was £2.2bn below the nominal amount, equivalent to an aggregate 41.3% decline in value on average for all investors.

Funding

The CDOs were funded with senior unrated notes and rated notes up to AAA. The capital structure senior to the AAA notes on cash CDOs was supported by a liquidity facility provided by the Group. The senior portion covered by liquidity facilities is on average 85% of the capital structure.

The initial WAL of the notes in issue averaged 6.7 years. The full contractual maturity is 38 years.

Interests in third party CDOs

The Group has purchased securities in and entered into derivative instruments with third party CDOs. These interests are held as trading assets or liabilities on the Group’s balance sheet and measured at fair value. The Group has not provided liquidity facilities or similar agreements to third party CDOs.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

25


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Off-balance sheet arrangements

Structured investment vehicles (SIVs)

The Group has not structured or managed SIVs. Group exposure to third party SIVs comprised:

£41m of senior liquidity facilities.

Derivative exposures included on the balance sheet at their net fair value of £273m.

Bonds issued by the SIVs included within trading portfolio assets at their fair value of £11m.

SIV-Lites

The Group has exposure to two SIV-Lite transactions. The Group is not involved in their ongoing management. Exposures have increased by £531m relating to a SIV-Lite which had previously been hedged with Lehman Brothers. Following the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy this facility was reflected as a new exposure to the underlying assets. The other SIV-Lite of £107m represents drawn liquidity facilities supporting a CP programme.

During 2008 exposure to a third SIV-Lite through bond holdings was written down to zero.

Commercial paper and medium-term note conduits

The Group provided £22bn in undrawn backstop liquidity facilities to its own sponsored CP conduits. The Group fully consolidates these entities such that the underlying assets are reflected on the Group balance sheet.

These consolidated entities in turn provide facilities of £899m to third party conduits containing prime UK buy-to-let RMBS. As at 31st December 2008, the entire facility had been drawn and is included in available for sale financial investments.

The Group provided backstop facilities to support the paper issued by four third party conduits. These facilities totalled £866m, with underlying collateral comprising 100% auto loans. Drawings on these facilities were £25m as at 31st December 2008 and are included within loans and advances to customers.

The Group provided backstop facilities to six third party SPEs that fund themselves with medium-term notes. These notes are sold to investors as a series of 12 month securities and remarketed to investors annually. If investors decline to renew their holdings at a price below a pre-agreed spread, the backstop facility requires the Group to purchase the outstanding notes at scheduled maturity. The Group has provided facilities of £2.6bn to SPEs holding prime UK and Australian owner-occupied Residential Mortgage Back Securities (RMBS) assets. As at the balance sheet date these facilities had been drawn and were included in loans and advances.

Asset securitisations

The Group has assisted companies with the formation of asset securitisations, some of which are effected through the use of SPEs. These entities have minimal equity and rely on funding in the form of notes to purchase the assets for securitisation. As these SPEs are created for other companies, the Group does not usually control these entities and therefore does not consolidate them. The Group may provide financing in the form of senior notes or junior notes and may also provide derivatives to the SPE. These transactions are included on the balance sheet.

The Group has used SPEs to securitise part of its originated and purchased retail and commercial lending portfolios and credit card receivables. These SPEs are usually consolidated and de-recognition only occurs when the Group transfers its contractual right to receive cash flows from the financial assets, or retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to another party without material delay or reinvestment, and also transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, including credit risk, prepayment risk and interest rate risk. The carrying amount of securitised assets together with the associated liabilities are set out in Note 29.

Client intermediation

The Group has structured transactions as a financial intermediary to meet investor and client needs. These transactions involve entities structured by either the Group or the client and they are used to modify cash flows of third party assets to create investments with specific risk or return profiles or to assist clients in the efficient management of other risks. Such transactions will typically result in a derivative being shown on the balance sheet, representing the Group’s exposure to the relevant asset.

The Group also invests in lessor entities specifically to acquire assets for leasing. Client intermediation also includes arrangements to fund the purchase or construction of specific assets (most common in the property industry).

Fund management

The Group provides asset management services to a large number of investment entities on an arm’s length basis and at market terms and prices. The majority of these entities are investment funds that are owned by a large and diversified number of investors. These funds are not consolidated because the Group does not own either a significant portion of the equity or the risks and rewards inherent in the assets.

During 2008, Group operating expenses included charges of £263m related to selective support of liquidity products managed by Barclays Global Investors and not consolidated by the Group. The Group have not provided any additional selective support subsequent to 31st December 2008.


26

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Critical accounting estimates

The Group’s accounting policies are set out on pages 193 to 203. Certain of these policies, as well as estimates made by management, are considered to be important to an understanding of the Group’s financial condition since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgements and estimates, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. The following accounting policies include estimates which are particularly sensitive in terms of judgements and the extent to which estimates are used. Other accounting policies involve significant amounts of judgements and estimates, but the total amounts involved are not significant to the financial statements. Management has discussed the accounting policies and critical accounting estimates with the Board Audit Committee.

Fair value of financial instruments

Some of the Group’s financial instruments are carried at fair value through profit or loss such as those held for trading, designated by management under the fair value option and non-cash flow hedging derivatives.

Other non-derivative financial assets may be designated as available for sale. Available for sale financial investments are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value of such assets are included as a separate component of equity. Financial instruments entered into as trading transactions, together with any associated hedging, are measured at fair value and the resultant profits and losses are included in net trading income, along with interest and dividends arising from long and short positions and funding costs relating to trading activities. Assets and liabilities resulting from gains and losses on financial instruments held for trading are reported gross in trading portfolio assets and liabilities or derivative financial instruments, reduced by the effects of netting agreements where there is an intention to settle net with counterparties.

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Where a valuation model is used to determine fair value, it makes maximum use of market inputs. Financial instruments with a fair value based on observable inputs include valuations determined by unadjusted quoted prices in an active market and market standard pricing models that use observable inputs.

Financial instruments whose fair value is determined, at least in part, using unobservable inputs are further categorised into Vanilla and Exotic products as follows:

Vanilla products are valued using simple models such as discounted cash flow or Black Scholes models however, some of the inputs are not observable.

Exotic products are over-the-counter products that are relatively bespoke, not commonly traded in the markets, and their valuation comes from sophisticated mathematical models where some of the inputs are not observable.

An analysis of financial instruments carried at fair value by valuation technique, including the extent of valuations based on unobservable inputs, together with a sensitivity analysis of valuations using unobservable inputs is included in Note 50.

Allowances for loan impairment and other credit risk provisions

Allowances for loan impairment represent management’s estimate of the losses incurred in the loan portfolios as at the balance sheet date. Changes to the allowances for loan impairment and changes to the provisions for undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided are reported in the consolidated income statement as part of the impairment charge. Provision is made for undrawn loan commitments and similar facilities if it is probable that the facility will be drawn and result in recognition of an asset at an amount less than the amount advanced.

Within the retail and small businesses portfolios, which comprise large numbers of small homogeneous assets with similar risk characteristics where credit scoring techniques are generally used, statistical techniques are used to calculate impairment allowances on a portfolio basis, based on historical recovery rates and assumed emergence periods. These statistical analyses use as primary inputs the extent to which accounts in the portfolio are in arrears and historical information on the eventual losses encountered from such delinquent portfolios. There are many such models in use, each tailored to a product, line of business or customer category. Judgement and knowledge is needed in selecting the statistical methods to use when the models are developed or revised. The impairment allowance reflected in the financial statements for these portfolios is therefore considered to be reasonable and supportable. The impairment charge reflected in the income statement for these portfolios is £2,333m (2007: £1,605m) and amounts to 51% (2007: 70%) of the total impairment charge on loans and advances in 2008.

For larger accounts, impairment allowances are calculated on an individual basis and all relevant considerations that have a bearing on the expected future cash flows are taken into account, for example, the business prospects for the customer, the realisable value of collateral, the Group’s position relative to other claimants, the reliability of customer information and the likely cost and duration of the work-out process. The level of the impairment allowance is the difference between the value of the discounted expected future cash flows (discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate), and its carrying amount. Subjective


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

27


Financial review

Additional financial disclosure

Critical accounting estimates

judgements are made in the calculation of future cash flows. Furthermore, judgements change with time as new information becomes available or as work-out strategies evolve, resulting in frequent revisions to the impairment allowance as individual decisions are taken. Changes in these estimates would result in a change in the allowances and have a direct impact on the impairment charge. The impairment charge reflected in the financial statements in relation to larger accounts is £2,251m (2007: £701m) or 49% (2007: 30%) of the total impairment charge on loans and advances in 2007. Further information on impairment allowances is set out in Note 47 on pages 257 and 260.

Goodwill

Management have to consider at least annually whether the current carrying value of goodwill is impaired. The first step of the impairment review process requires the identification of independent cash generating units, by dividing the Group business into as many largely independent income streams as is reasonably practicable. The goodwill is then allocated to these independent units. The first element of this allocation is based on the areas of the business expected to benefit from the synergies derived from the acquisition. The second element reflects the allocation of the net assets acquired and the difference between the consideration paid for those net assets and their fair value. This allocation is reviewed following business reorganisation. The carrying value of the unit, including the allocated goodwill, is compared to its fair value to determine whether any impairment exists. If the fair value of a unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill will be impaired. Detailed calculations may need to be carried out taking into consideration changes in the market in which a business operates (e.g. competitive activity, regulatory change). In the absence of readily available market price data this calculation is based

upon discounting expected pre-tax cash flows at a risk adjusted interest rate appropriate to the operating unit, the determination of both of which requires the exercise of judgement. The estimation of pre-tax cash flows is sensitive to the periods for which detailed forecasts are available and to assumptions regarding the long-term sustainable cash flows. While forecasts are compared with actual performance and external economic data, expected cash flows naturally reflect management’s view of future performance. The most significant amounts of goodwill relate to UK Retail Banking, GRCB – Absa and Barclays Global Investors, where goodwill impairment testing performed in 2008 indicated that this goodwill was not impaired. Goodwill impairment of £111m relating to FirstPlus and EquiFirst was recognised in 2008 (2007: nil). An analysis of goodwill by cluster, together with key assumptions underlying the impairment testing, is included in Note 21 on page 208.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets that derive their value from contractual customer relationships or that can be separated and sold and have a finite useful life are amortised over their estimated useful life. Determining the estimated useful life of these finite life intangible assets requires an analysis of circumstances, and judgement by the Bank’s management. At each balance sheet date, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances dictate, intangible assets are assessed for indications of impairment. If indications are present, these assets are subject to an impairment review. The impairment review comprises a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset with its recoverable amount: the higher of the asset’s or the cash-generating unit’s net selling price and its value in use. Net selling price is calculated by reference to the amount at which the asset could be disposed of in a binding sale agreement in an arm’s length


28

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

transaction evidenced by an active market or recent transactions for similar assets. Value in use is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows obtainable as a result of the asset’s continued use, including those resulting from its ultimate disposal, at a market-based discount rate on a pre-tax basis. The most significant amounts of intangible assets relate to the GRCB – Absa and Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

Retirement benefit obligations

The Group provides pension plans for employees in most parts of the world. Arrangements for staff retirement benefits vary from country to country and are made in accordance with local regulations and customs. For defined contribution schemes, the pension cost recognised in the profit and loss account represents the contributions payable to the scheme. For defined benefit schemes, actuarial valuation of each of the scheme’s obligations using the projected unit credit method and the fair valuation of each of the scheme’s assets are performed annually in accordance with the requirements of IAS 19.

The actuarial valuation is dependent upon a series of assumptions, the key ones being interest rates, mortality, investment returns and inflation. Mortality estimates are based on standard industry and national mortality tables, adjusted where appropriate to reflect the Group’s own experience. The returns on fixed interest investments are set to market yields at the valuation date (less an allowance for risk) to ensure consistency with the asset valuation. The returns on UK and overseas equities are based on the long-term outlook for global equities at the calculation date having regard to current market yields and dividend growth expectations. The inflation assumption reflects long-term expectations of both earnings and retail price inflation.

The difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, adjusted for any historic unrecognised actuarial gains or losses and past service cost, is recognised as a liability in the balance sheet. An asset arising, for example, as a result of past over-funding or the performance of the plan investments, is recognised to the extent that it does not exceed the present value of future contribution holidays or refunds of contributions. To the extent that any unrecognised gains or losses at the start of the measurement year in relation to any individual defined benefit scheme exceed 10% of the greater of the fair value of the scheme assets and the defined benefit obligation for that scheme, a proportion of the excess is recognised in the income statement.

The Group’s IAS 19 pension deficit across all schemes as at 31st December 2008 was £1,287m (2007: surplus of £393m). There are net recognised liabilities of £1,292m (2007: £1,501m) and unrecognised actuarial gains of £5m (2007: £1,894m). The net recognised liabilities comprised retirement benefit liabilities of £1,357m (2007: £1,537m) and assets of £65m (2007: £36m).

The Group’s IAS 19 pension deficit in respect of the main UK scheme as at 31st December 2008 was £858m (2007: surplus of £668m). Among the reasons for this change were the large loss in value of the assets over the year, and to a lesser extent the strengthening of the allowance made for future improvement in mortality. Offsetting these were the increase in the AA long-term corporate bond yields which resulted in a higher discount rate of 6.75% (2007: 5.82%), a decrease in the inflation assumption to 3.16% (2007: 3.45%) and contributions paid. Further information on retirement benefit obligations, including assumptions, is set out in Note 30 to the accounts on page 220.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

29


Business descriptionDescription

Barclays Overview

Listed in London and New York, Barclays is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail and commercial banking, credit cards, investment banking, wealth management and investment management services with an extensive international presence in Europe, United States, Africa and Asia. With a strong long-term credit rating and over 300 years of history and expertise in banking, Barclays operates in over 50 countries and employs 156,000 people. Barclays moves, lends and invests money for 48 million customers and clients worldwide.

The following section analyses the Group’s performance by business. For management and reporting purposes, Barclays is organised into the following business groupings:

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

 

· 

UK Retail Banking, comprising:

 

UK Retail Banking

Barclays Commercial Bank (formerly UK Business Banking)

·

Barclaycard

·

International Retail and Commercial Banking, comprising

 

International Retail and Commercial Banking-excluding Absa

Barclaycard

 

International Retail and Commercial Banking-Absa.

GRCB –Western Europe

GRCB – Emerging Markets

GRCB – Absa

Investment Banking and Investment Management

 

· 

Barclays Capital

 

· 

Barclays Global Investors

 

· 

Barclays WealthBarclaysWealth

Head office functionsOffice Functions and other operationsOther Operations

UK Banking

UK Banking delivers banking solutions to Barclays UK retail and business banking customers. It offers a range of integrated products and services and access to the expertise of other Group businesses. Customers are served through a variety of channels comprising the branch network, automated teller machines, telephone banking, online banking and relationship managers. UK Banking is managed through two business areas, UK Retail Banking and Barclays Commercial Bank.

UK Retail Banking

UK Retail Banking, one of the largest retail banks in the UK with over 1,700 branches, comprises Personal Customers, Home Finance, Local Business, Consumer Lending and Barclays Financial Planning. This cluster of businesses aims to build broader and deeper relationships with its Personal and Local Business customers through providing a wide range of products and financial services. Personal Customers and Home Finance provide access to current account and savings products, Woolwich branded mortgages and general insurance. Consumer Lending provides unsecured loan and protection products and Barclays Financial Planning provides investment advice and products. Local Business provides banking services, including money transmission, to small businesses.

Barclays Commercial Bank

Barclays Commercial Bank provides banking services to organisationsover 81,000 business clients with an annual turnover of more than £1m. Customers are served via a network of relationship and industry sector specialists, which provides solutions constructed from a comprehensive suite of banking products, support, expertise and services, including specialist asset financing and leasing facilities. Customers are also offered access to the products and expertise of other businesses in the Barclays Group, particularly Barclays Capital, Barclaycard and Barclays Wealth.

Barclaycard

Barclaycard is a multi-brand credit card and consumer lending business which also processes card payments for retailers and merchants and issues credit and charge cards to corporate customers and the UK Government. ItWith 23 million customers in the UK, Europe and the United States, it is one of Europe’s leading credit card businesses and has an increasing presence in the United States.

States and South Africa. In the UK, Barclaycard comprises Barclaycard UK Cards, Barclaycard Partnerships, (SkyCard, Thomas Cook, Argos and Solution Personal Finance), Barclays Partner Finance (formerly CFS) and FirstPlus.

Outside the UK, Barclaycard provides credit cards in the United States, Germany, Spain, ItalySouth Africa (through management of the Absa credit card portfolio) and Portugal. Inin the NordicScandinavian region, where Barclaycard operates through Entercard, a joint venture with Swedbank.

Barclaycard works closely with other parts of the Group, including UK Retail Banking, Barclays Commercial Bank and International RetailGRCB –Western Europe and Commercial Banking,GRCB – Emerging Markets, to leverage their distribution capabilities.

InternationalGlobal Retail and Commercial Banking –Western Europe

InternationalGRCB –Western Europe encompasses Barclays Global Retail and Commercial Banking provides banking services to Barclays personalas well as Barclaycard operations in Spain, Italy, Portugal and France. GRCB –Western Europe serves two million retail, premier, card, SME and corporate customers outsidethrough a variety of distribution channels from nearly 1,200 distribution points. GRCB –Western Europe provides a variety of products including Retail mortgages, current and deposit accounts, commercial lending, unsecured lending, credit cards, investments and insurance, serving the UK. The productsneeds of Barclays retail, mass affluent, and services offered to customers are tailored to meet the customer needs and the regulatory and commercial environments within each country. For reporting purposes, the operations are grouped into two components: International Retail and Commercial Banking-excluding Absa and International Retail and Commercial Banking-Absa. Internationalcorporate customers.

Global Retail and Commercial Banking works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from product and service propositions.

International Retail and Commercial Banking-excluding Absa– Emerging Markets

InternationalGRCB – Emerging Markets encompasses Barclays Global Retail and Commercial Banking, - excluding Absaas well as Barclaycard operations, in 14 countries organised in six geographic areas: India and Indian Ocean (India, Mauritius and Seychelles); Middle East and North Africa (UAE and Egypt); East and West Africa (Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya); Southern Africa (Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe); Russia; and Pakistan (from 23rd July 2008). GRCB – Emerging Markets serves over four million customers through a variety of distribution channels, opening over 280 distribution points in 2008. GRCB – Emerging Markets provides a rangevariety of banking services totraditional retail and corporate customers in Western Europecommercial products including retail mortgages, current and Emerging Markets, including currentdeposit accounts, savings, investments, mortgagescommercial lending, unsecured lending, credit cards, treasury and loans. Barclays Western Europe business includes Spain, Italy, Franceinvestments. In addition to this, it provides specialist services such as Sharia-compliant products and Portugal. Emerging Markets includes operations in Africa, India and the Middle East.mobile banking.

InternationalGlobal Retail and Commercial Banking-AbsaBanking – Absa

International Retail and Commercial Banking-AbsaGRCB – Absa represents Barclays consolidation of Absa, excluding Absa Capital and Absa Card which is included as part of Barclays Capital.Capital and Barclaycard respectively. Absa Group Limited is one ofa South Africa’s largestAfrican financial services organisationsorganisation serving over 10 million personal, commercial and corporate customers predominantly in South Africa. International Retail and Commercial Banking-AbsaAfrica, from over 1,100 distribution points. GRCB – Absa serves retail customers through a variety of distribution channels and offers a full range of banking services, including current and deposit accounts, mortgages, instalment finance, credit cards, bancassurance products and wealth management services. It also offers customised business solutions for commercial and large corporate customers.


8

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Barclays Capital

Barclays Capital is a leading globalthe investment bank whichbanking division of Barclays that provides large corporate, institutional and government clients with solutions to their financing and risk management needs.

Barclays Capital services a wide variety of client needs, fromcovering strategic advisory and Mergers and Acquisitions; equity and fixed income capital raising and managingcorporate lending; and risk management across foreign exchange, interest rate, equityrates, equities and commodity risks, through to providing technical advice and expertise.commodities. Activities are organised into three principal areas: Rates,Global Markets, which includes fixed income,commodities, credit products, equities, foreign exchange, commodities, emerging markets, money markets, prime services and equityinterest rate products; Credit,Investment Banking, which includes primarycorporate advisory, Mergers and secondary activities for loansAcquisitions, equity and bonds for investment grade, high yieldfixed-income capital raising and emerging market credit, as well as hybrid capital products, asset based finance, mortgage backed securities, credit derivatives, structured capital markets and large asset leasing;corporate lending; and Private Equity.Equity and Principal Investments. Barclays Capital includes Absa Capital, the investment banking business of Absa. Barclays Capital works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities.

Barclays Global Investors

Barclays Global Investors (BGI)BGI is one of the world’s largestan asset managersmanager and a leading global provider of investment management products and services.

services, with US$1.5 trillion assets under management. BGI offers structured investment strategies such as indexing, global asset allocation and risk controlled active products including hedge funds and provides related investment services such as securities lending, cash management and portfolio transition services. In addition, BGI is the global leader in assets and products in the exchange traded funds business, with over 320 funds for institutions and individuals trading globally. BGI’s investment philosophy is founded on managing all dimensions of performance: a consistent focus on controlling risk, return and cost. BGI collaborates with the other Barclays businesses, particularly Barclays Capital and Barclays Wealth, to develop and market products and leverage capabilities to better serve the client base.

Barclays Wealth

Barclays Wealth serves high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients worldwide, providing private banking, asset management, stockbroking, offshore banking, wealth structuring and financial planning services and managesmanaged the closed life assurance activities of Barclays and Woolwich in the UK.

Barclays Wealth works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities.

Head office functionsOffice Functions and other operationsOther Operations

Head Office Functions and Other Operations comprises head office and central support functions, businesses in transition and other operations comprise:

Head office and central support functions

Businesses in transition

Consolidation adjustments.

inter-segment adjustments. Head office and central support functions comprises the following areas: Executive Management, Finance, Treasury, Corporate Affairs, Human Resources, Strategy and Planning, Internal Audit, Legal, Corporate Secretariat, Property, Tax, Compliance and Risk. Costs incurred wholly on behalf of the businesses are recharged to them.

Businesses in transition principally relate to certain lending portfolios that are centrally managed with the objective of maximising recovery from the assets.

Consolidation adjustments largely reflect the elimination of inter-segment transactions.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

9


LOGO

Financial review

Analysis of results by business

Analysis of results by business

For the year ended 31st December 2007

 

 
    

UK
Banking

£m

  

Barclaycard

£m

  

International
Retail and
Commercial
Banking

£m

  

Barclays
Capital

£m

  

Barclays
Global
Investors

£m

  

Barclays
Wealth

£m

  

Head office
functions
and other
operations

£m

  

Group

£m

 
Net interest income  4,596  1,394  1,890  1,179  (8) 431  128  9,610 
Net fee and commission income  1,932  1,080  1,210  1,235  1,936  739  (424) 7,708 
Principal transactionsa  56  11  248  4,692  (4) 55  (83) 4,975 
Net premiums from insurance contracts  252  40  372      195  152  1,011 
Other income  58  (26) 87  13  2  19  35  188 
Total income  6,894  2,499  3,807  7,119  1,926  1,439  (192) 23,492 
Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts  (43) (13) (284)     (152)   (492)
Total income, net of insurance claims  6,851  2,486  3,523  7,119  1,926  1,287  (192) 23,000 
Impairment charges  (849) (838) (252) (846)   (7) (3) (2,795)
Net income  6,002  1,648  3,271  6,273  1,926  1,280  (195) 20,205 
Operating expenses  (3,370) (1,101) (2,356) (3,973) (1,192) (973) (234) (13,199)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  7  (7) 7  35        42 
Profit before business disposals  2,639  540  922  2,335  734  307  (429) 7,048 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures  14    13        1  28 
Profit before tax  2,653  540  935  2,335  734  307  (428) 7,076 
As at 31st December 2007                         
Total assets  161,777  22,164  89,457  839,662  89,224  18,024  7,053  1,227,361 
Total liabilities  166,988  1,559  48,809  811,516  87,101  43,988  34,924  1,194,885 

Note

aPrincipal transactions comprise net trading income and net investment income.

1030 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

UK Banking

Who we are

UK Banking comprises UK Retail Banking and Barclays Commercial Bank (formerly UK Business Banking).

What we do

UK Banking delivers banking solutions to Barclays retail and business banking customers in the United Kingdom. We offer a range of integrated products and services and access to the expertise of other Group businesses. Customers are served through a variety of channels comprising the branch network, automated teller machines, telephone banking, online banking and relationship managers.

Highlights

LOGO

Performance

2007/06

UK Banking profit before tax increasedgrew 7% to £1,369m. Income grew 4% (£107m) to £2,653m (2006: £2,546m)£4,482m, reflecting strong growth in Home Finance and minimal settlements on overdraft fees. Loans and advances grew 15% driven principally by solid income growth. Results includeda market share of net new mortgage lending of 36%. Operating expenses showed a modest increase of 2% reflecting active management of the cost base and reduced gains from the sale and leaseback of properties and property sales of £232m (2006: £313m).

property. The cost:income ratio improved one percentage pointpoint. Impairment charges increased 8% reflecting strong growth in assets and a deteriorating economic environment.

Barclays Commercial Bank profit before tax decreased 7% to 49%. Excluding£1,266m. Income growth of 7% principally reflected increased sales of treasury products. Loans and advances to customers increased 14% to £80.5bn. Costs increased 14% driven by lower gains on the impactsale of settlementsproperty, further investment in new payments capability, and growth in the operating lease business. Impairment charges increased 42% as the deteriorating economic environment caused higher delinquency and lower recovery rates on overdraft fees in relation to prior years (£116m), the cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 48%, making eight percentage points of improvement from 2004 to 2007 compared to the target of six percentage points.corporate credit.

2006/05

UK BankingBarclaycard profit before tax increased 14% (£310m)31% to £2,546m (2005: £2,236m)£789m, including £260m from Barclaycard International. Income growth of 27% reflected strong growth in Barclaycard International, the income related to Goldfish since acquisition, and gains relating to the Visa IPO and the sale of MasterCard shares. Costs increased 30% reflecting continued international growth, increased marketing expenditure and the impact of Goldfish. Impairment charges increased 33% reflecting growth in charges in the international businesses and the acquisition of Goldfish, partly offset by lower impairment in the other UK businesses.

GRCB – Western Europe profit before tax grew 31% to £257m. Income grew 53%, driven principallyby very strong growth in deposits, mortgages

and commercial lending across the expanded franchise, as well as gains of £82m relating to the Visa IPO and the sale of MasterCard shares. Costs increased 38% reflecting the expansion of the network by 347 distribution points to 1,145 and continued strategic investment in the Premier and core retail businesses. Impairment charges increased £220m to £296m, largely driven by deteriorating trends in Spain which led to losses in property-related commercial banking exposures and credit cards.

GRCB – Emerging Markets profit before tax increased 34% to £134m. Income increased 91%, driven by retail expansion in India, entry into new markets in Russia and Pakistan and strong performances in Africa, as well as gains of £82m relating to the Visa IPO and sale of MasterCard shares. Operating expense growth of 82% reflected continued investment in business infrastructure, distribution and new markets. Distribution points increased 286 to 836. Impairment charges increased £127m to £166m reflecting asset growth, and increased wholesale impairment in Africa.

GRCB – Absa profit before tax decreased 8% to £552m. Income growth of 10% was driven by higher fees and commissions, balance sheet growth as well as a gain relating to the Visa IPO. Operating expenses increased 3%, well below the rate of inflation, reflecting investment in new distribution points, which increased 176 to 1,177, offset by good cost control. This led to a four percentage point improvement in the cost:income growth. Profit before business disposals grew 10% (£234m)ratio to £2,470m (2005: £2,236m)59%. Impairment charges rose £201m to £347m, mainly due to prolonged high interest rates and inflation rates and increased customer indebtedness resulting in higher delinquency levels in the retail portfolios.


Analysis of results by business

For the year ended 31st December 2008

    

UK
Retail
Banking

£m

  

Barclays

Commercial
Bank

£m

  Barclaycard
£m
  GRCB –
Western
Europe
£m
  GRCB –
Emerging
Markets
£m
  GRCB –
Absa
£m
 
Net interest income  2,996  1,757  1,786  856  616  1,104 
Net fee and commission income  1,299  861  1,299  383  223  762 
Principal transactions    22  82  165  169  111 
Net premiums from insurance contracts  205    44  352    234 
Other income  17  105  19  39  11  113 
Total income  4,517  2,745  3,230  1,795  1,019  2,324 
Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts  (35)   (11) (365)   (126)
Total income, net of insurance claims  4,482  2,745  3,219  1,430  1,019  2,198 
Impairment charges and other credit provisions  (602) (414) (1,097) (296) (166) (347)
Net income  3,880  2,331  2,122  1,134  853  1,851 
Operating expenses  (2,519) (1,063) (1,422) (929) (719) (1,305)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  8  (2) (3)     5 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries            1 
Gains on acquisitions      92  52     
Profit before tax  1,369  1,266  789  257  134  552 
As at 31st December 2008                   
Total assets  101,384  84,029  30,925  64,732  14,653  40,391 
Total liabilities  104,640  64,997  3,004  37,250  10,517  20,720 

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

11


LOGO

   

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

      

2005

£m

 

Income statement information

       

Net interest income

  4,596     4,467     4,213 

Net fee and commission income

  1,932     1,874     1,728 

Net trading income

  9     2      

Net investment income

  47     28     26 

Principal transactions

  56     30     26 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  252     342     298 

Other income

  58      63      32 

Total income

  6,894     6,776     6,297 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  (43)       (35)       (61)  

Total income, net of insurance claims

  6,851     6,741     6,236 

Impairment charges

  (849)       (887)       (671)  

Net income

  6,002     5,854     5,565 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (3,358)      (3,387)      (3,323)  

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (12)      (2)      (3)  

Operating expenses

  (3,370)      (3,389)      (3,326) ��

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  7     5     (3)  

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  14      76       

Profit before tax

  2,653      2,546      2,236 

Balance sheet information

       

Loans and advances to customers

 £145.3bn    £131.0bn    £125.5bn 

Customer accounts

 £147.9bn    £139.7bn    £127.2bn 

Total assets

 £161.8bn     £147.6bn     £138.0bn 

Selected statistical measures

                  

Cost:income ratioa

  49%     50%     53%

Risk Tendencya

 £775m    £790m    £665m 

Risk weighted assets

 £99.8bn     £93.0bn     £87.9bn 

aDefined on page 2.

12 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 31


LOGO

Investment Banking and Investment Management

Barclays Capital profit before tax was £1,302m in a very challenging market, down 44%, and included a gain on the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £2,262m. Net income of £2,808m was down 55% as the impact of market dislocation continued and included gross losses of £8,053m, partially offset by related income and hedges of £1,433m and gains of £1,663m from the general widening of credit spreads on structured notes issued by Barclays Capital. There were record performances in interest rate products, currency products, emerging markets, prime services and commodities. Equities, credit products, mortgages and asset backed securities and private equity were significantly impacted by market dislocation and recorded lower income than in 2007. Operating expenses, after absorbing Lehman Brothers North American businesses, were 5% lower than in 2007 due to lower performance related pay.

Barclays Global Investors profit before tax decreased 19% to £595m. Income fell 4% to £1,844m due to lower incentive fees. Operating expenses increased 5% and included charges of £263m (2007: £80m) related to selective support of liquidity products. Total assets under management were US$1,495bn, reflecting net new assets of US$99bn, negative market moves of US$553bn and adverse exchange rate movements of US$130bn.

Barclays Wealth profit before tax grew 119% to £671m, including a £326m profit on disposal of the closed life business, which contributed profit before tax of £104m before disposal. Income growth of 3% to £1,324m reflected strong growth in customer deposits and lending, partially offset by the impact of lower equity markets on fee income. Operating expenses decreased 4% reflecting strong cost control. Total client assets increased 10% (£12.6bn) to £145.1bn, with net new asset inflows and the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses offsetting the impact of negative market movements and the sale of the closed life business.


 

Analysis of results by business

For the year ended 31st December 2008

 
    

Barclays
Capital

£m

  

Barclays
Global
Investors

£m

  Barclays
Wealth
£m
 
Net interest income  1,724  (38) 486 
Net fee and commission income  1,429  1,917  720 
Principal transactions  2,065  (43) (344)
Net premiums from insurance contracts      136 
Other income  13  8  26 
Total income  5,231  1,844  1,024 
Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts      300 
Total income, net of insurance claims  5,231  1,844  1,324 
Impairment charges and other credit provisions  (2,423)   (44)
Net income  2,808  1,844  1,280 
Operating expenses  (3,774) (1,249) (935)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  6     
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries      326 
Gain on acquisition  2,262     
Profit before tax  1,302  595  671 
As at 31st December 2008          
Total assets  1,629,117  71,340  13,263 
Total liabilities  1,603,093  68,372  45,846 

32

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

UK Retail Banking

Who we are

UK Retail Banking comprises Personal Customers, Home Finance, Local Business, Consumer Lending and Barclays Financial Planning. We have one of the largest branch networks in the UK with around 1,700 branches and an extensive network of cash machines.

What we do

Our cluster of businesses aims to build broader and deeper relationships with customers. Personal Customers and Home Finance provide a wide range of products and services to retail customers, including current accounts, savings and investment products, mortgages branded Woolwich and general insurance. Barclays Financial Planning provides banking, investment products and advice to affluent customers.

Local Business provides banking services to small businesses. UK Retail Banking is also a gateway to more specialised services from other parts of Barclays such as Barclays Stockbrokers.

Our business serves 1515.2 million UK customers.

Performance

2008/07

UK Retail Banking profit before tax increased 7% (£94m) to £1,369m (2007: £1,275m) through solid income growth and continued good control of impairment and costs. The launch of new products and propositions supported a significant increase in customer accounts, with Current Accounts increasing 4% (0.4m) to 11.7m (2007: 11.3m), Savings

Accounts increasing 8% (0.9m) to 12.0m (2007: 11.1m) and Mortgage Accounts increasing 8% (62,000) to 816,000 (2007: 754,000).

Income grew 4% (£185m) to £4,482m (2007: £4,297m) reflecting strong growth in Home Finance and solid growth in Consumer Lending and Local Business, partially offset by reduced income from Personal Customer Savings Accounts due to the impact of the reductions in the UK base rates in the second half of 2008.

Net interest income increased 5% (£138m) to £2,996m (2007: £2,858m) driven by strong growth in loans and advances. Total average customer deposit balances increased 5% to £85.9bn (2007: £81.8bn), reflecting solid growth in Personal Customer and Local Business balances.

Mortgage balances grew 18%, driven by increased share of new lending and higher levels of balance retention. Mortgage balances were £82.3bn at the end of the period (31st December 2007: £69.8bn), a market share of 7% (2007: 6%). Gross advances were stable at £22.9bn, with redemptions of £10.4bn (2007: £15.0bn). Net new lending was £12.5bn (2007: £8.0bn), a market shareb of 36% (2007: 8%). The average loan to value ratio of the mortgage book (including buy-to-let) on a current valuation basis was 40% (2007: 34%). The average loan to value ratio of new mortgage lending was 47% (2007: 49%).

Net fee and commission income increased 10% (£116m) to £1,299m (2007: £1,183m) reflecting £116m settlements on overdraft fees in 2007. Excluding this, net fees and commissions were stable.

Impairment charges increased 8% (£43m) to £602m (2007: £559m), reflecting growth in customer assets of 15% and the impact of the current economic environment. Mortgage impairment charges were £24m (2007: release of £3m). Impairment charges within Consumer Lending increased 3%.


Highlights

LOGO

Performance indicators

LOGO

 

 

Key facts

 

    

2008

 

  

2007

 

  

2006

 

Personal Customers

      

Number of UK current accountsa

   11.7m   11.3m   11.5m

Number of UK savings accounts

   12.0m   11.1m   11.0m

Total UK mortgage balances

  £82.3bn  £69.8bn  £61.7bn

Local Business

      
Number of Local Business customers   660,000   643,000   630,000

Notes

aDecrease in 2007 reflects the consolidation of Woolwich and Barclays current accounts.
bExcludes Housing Associations.

 

LOGOBarclaysAnnual Report 200833

Performance indicators

LOGO


LOGO

 

PerformanceOperating expenses increased 2% (£49m) to £2,519m (2007: £2,470m) reflecting reduced gains from the sale of property of £75m (2007: £193m). Continued strong and active management of expense lines, including back-office consolidation and process efficiencies, funded increased investment in product development and distribution channels.

The cost:income ratio improved one percentage point to 56% (2007: 57%).

2007/06

UK Retail Banking profit excludingbefore tax increased 9%8%101m)94m) to £1,282m£1,275m (2006: £1,181m) due to reduced costs and a strong improvement in impairment.

Including the impact of settlements on overdraft fees from prior years (£116m), income decreased 1% (£49m) to £4,297m (2006: £4,346m). Income grew 2% (£67m) excludingbefore the impact of settlements on overdraft fees in relation to prior years (£116m). This was driven by very strong growth in Personal Customer retail savings and good growth in Personal Customer current accounts, Home Finance and Local Business. Including the impact of settlements on overdraft fees, income decreased £49m to £4,297m (2006: £4,346m).

Net interest income increased 3% (£93m) to £2,858m (2006: £2,765m). Growth was driven by a higher contribution from deposits, through a combination of good balance sheet growth and an increased liability margin. Total average customer deposit balances increased 7% to £81.9bn (2006: £76.5bn), supported by the launch of new products.

Mortgage volumes increased significantly, driven by an improved mix of longer term value products for customers, higher levels of retention and continuing improvements in processing capability. Mortgage balances were £69.8bn at the end of the period (2006: £61.7bn), an approximate market share of 6% (2006: 6%). Gross advances were 25% higher at £23.0bn (2006: £18.4bn). Net lending was £8.0bn (2006: £2.4bn), representing market share of 8% (2006: 2%). The average loan to value

ratio of the residential mortgage book on a current valuation basis was 33%. The average loan to value ratio of new residential mortgage lending in 2007 was 54%. Consumer Lending balances decreased 4% to £7.9bn (2006: £8.2bn), reflecting the impact of tighter lending criteria.

Overall asset margins decreased as a result of the increased proportion of mortgages and contraction in unsecured loans.

Net fee and commission income reduced 4% (£49m) to £1,183m (2006: £1,232m). There was strong Current Account income growth in Personal Customers and good growth within Local Business. This was more than offset by settlements on overdraft fees.

Net premiums from insurance underwriting activities reduced 26% (£90m) to £252m (2006: £342m), as there continued to be lower customer take-up of loan protection insurance. Net claims and benefits on insurance contracts increased to £43m (2006: £35m).

Impairment charges decreased 12% (£76m) to £559m (2006: £635m) reflecting lower charges in unsecured Consumer Lending and Local Business. This was driven by improvements in the collection process which led to reduced flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and stable charge-offs. Mortgage impairment charges remained negligible.

Operating expenses reduced 3%2%69m)62m) to £2,463m£2,470m (2006: £2,532m), reflecting strong and active management of all expense lines, targeted processing improvements and back officeback-office consolidation. Gains from the sale of property were £193m (2006: £253m). Increased investment was focused on improving the overall customer experience through converting and improving the branch network; revitalising the product offering; increasing operational and process efficiency; and meeting regulatory requirements.

The cost:income ratio improved one percentage point to 57%. Excluding the impact of settlements on overdraft fees, from prior years (£116m), the cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 56%.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

13


LOGO

 

    

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

      

2005

£m

 

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   2,858     2,765     2,677 

Net fee and commission income

   1,183 ��   1,232     1,065 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   252     342     372 

Other income

   47      42      24 

Total income

   4,340     4,381     4,138 

Net claims and benefits on insurance contracts

   (43)     (35)     (61)

 

Total income net of insurance claims

   4,297     4,346     4,077 

Impairment charges

   (559)     (635)     (494)

 

Net income

   3,738     3,711     3,583 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (2,455)    (2,531)    (2,501)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (8)    (1)     

Operating expenses

   (2,463)    (2,532)    (2,501)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

   7      2      (6)

 

Profit before tax

   1,282      1,181      1,076 

 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £82.0bn    £74.7bn    £72.1bn 

Customer accounts

  £87.1bn    £82.3bn    £76.3bn 

Total assets

  £87.8bn     £81.7bn     £78.1bn 

Selected statistical measures

                   

Cost:income ratioa

   57%     58%     61%

Risk Tendencya

  £470m    £500m    £415m 

Risk weighted assets

  £46.0bn    £43.0bn    £40.8bn 

UK Retail Banking

    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   2,996     2,858     2,765 

Net fee and commission income

   1,299     1,183     1,232 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   205     252     342 

Other income

   17      47      42 

Total income

   4,517     4,340     4,381 

Net claims and benefits on insurance contracts

   (35)     (43)     (35)

Total income net of insurance claims

   4,482     4,297     4,346 

Impairment charges

   (602)     (559)     (635)

Net income

   3,880     3,738     3,711 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (2,499)    (2,461)    (2,531)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (20)    (9)    (1)

Operating expenses

   (2,519)    (2,470)    (2,532)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

   8      7      2 

Profit before tax

   1,369      1,275      1,181 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £94.4bn    £82.0bn    £74.7bn 

Customer accounts

  £89.6bn    £87.1bn    £82.3bn 

Total assets

  £101.4bn     £88.5bn     £81.7bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost:income ratio

   56%      57%      58% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk tendency

  £520m    £470m    £500m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £30.5bn     £31.5bn     £43.0bn 

Note

 

aDefined on page 2.Risk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

2006/05

UK Retail Banking profit before tax increased 10% (£105m) to £1,181m (2005: £1,076m), driven by good income growth and well controlled costs. There has been substantial additional investment to transform the business.

Income increased 7% (£269m) to £4,346m (2005: £4,077m). Income growth was broadly based. There was strong income growth in Personal Customers retail savings, Local Business and UK Premier and good growth in Personal Customers current account income. Sales volumes increased, with a particularly strong performance from direct channels.

Net interest income increased 3% (£88m) to £2,765m (2005: £2,677m). Growth was driven by a higher contribution from deposits, through a combination of good balance sheet growth and a stable liability margin. Total average customer deposit balances increased 8% to £76.5bn (2005: £71.0bn), supported by new products. Growth of personal savings was above that of the market.

Mortgage volumes improved significantly, driven by a focus on improving capacity, customer service, value and promotion. UK residential mortgage balances ended the year at £61.7bn (2005: £59.6bn). Gross advances were 60% higher at £18.4bn (2005: £11.5bn), with a market share of 5% (2005: 4%). Net lending was £2.4bn, with performance improving during the year, leading to a market share of 4% in the second half of the year. The mortgage margin was reduced by changed assumptions used in the calculation of effective interest rates, a higher proportion of new mortgages and base rate changes. The new business spread was in line with the industry. The loan to value ratio within the residential mortgage book on a current valuation basis was 34% (2005: 35%).

There was good balance growth in non-mortgage loans, where Local Business average balances increased 9% and UK Premier average balances increased 25%.

Net fee and commission income increased 16% (£167m) to £1,232m (2005: £1,065m). There was strong current account income growth in Personal Customers and Local Business. UK Premier delivered strong growth reflecting higher income from banking services, mortgage sales and investment advice.

Net premiums from insurance underwriting activities decreased 8% (£30m) to £342m (2005: £372m). There continued to be lower customer take-up of loan protection insurance. Net claims and benefits on insurance contracts improved to £35m (2005: £61m).

Impairment charges increased 29% (£141m) to £635m (2005: £494m). The increase principally reflected balance growth and some deterioration in delinquency rates in the Local Business loan book. Losses from the mortgage portfolio remained negligible, with arrears at low levels.

Operating expenses were steady at £2,532m (2005: £2,501m). Gains from the sale and leaseback of property amounted to £253m (2005: nil). Investment in the business to improve customer service and deliver sustainable performance improvements was directed at upgrading distribution capabilities, including restructuring and improving the branch network. Further investment was focused on upgrading the contact centres, transforming the performance of the mortgage business, revitalising the retail product range to meet customers’ needs, improving core operations and processes and rationalising the number of operating sites. The level of investment reflected in operating expenses in 2006 was approximately double the level of 2005.

The cost:income ratio improved three percentage points to 58% (2005: 61%).


 

1434 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Barclays Commercial Bank

Who we are

Barclays Commercial Bank comprises 8,400 colleagues who serve 81,000 customers.

Earlier this year, we launched our new brand – Barclays Commercial Bank –is one of the UK’s leading providers of banking solutions to replace UK Business Banking. This new identity is muchbusiness customers and clients with an annual turnover of more than just a name change. Instead, it more accurately reflects our current capabilities and future aspirations, and it is scalable across markets. To complement the new identity, we also launched a clear customer proposition. It comprises three elements:£1m.

·

relationship

·

specialisation

·

innovation

These encapsulate our capability to deliver distinctive service and solutions that meet our customers’ needs.

What we do

Barclays Commercial Bank provides banking services to organisations with an annual turnover of more than £1m. Customers are served81,000 customers in the UK via a network of relationship, regional, industry-sector and industry sector specialists, which providesproduct specialists.

Working closely with our clients to understand their needs, we deliver financing, risk management, trade and cash management solutions constructed from a comprehensive suite of banking products, support, expertise and services, includingservices. This includes specialist asset financing and leasing facilities.

We are a key component of the Barclays universal banking model, delivering income in partnership with all the constituent business units of the Barclays Group.

Highlights

LOGO

 

Performance indicators

LOGO

Performance

2007/062008/07

Barclays Commercial Bank profit before tax decreased 7% (£91m) to £1,266m (2007: £1,357m) reflecting a resilient performance in challenging market conditions. The impact of growth in net fee and commission income and continued strong growth in customer lending was offset by increased £6mimpairment charges and higher operating expenses.

Income increased 7%(£181m)to£2,745m (2007:£2,564m).

Net interest income improved 1% (£10m) to £1,371m£1,757m (2007: £1,747m). There was strong growth in average customer assets, particularly term loans, which increased 14% to £61.7bn (2007: £53.9bn) reflecting the continued commitment to lend to viable businesses. Average customer accounts grew 3% to £47.6bn (2007: £46.4bn).

Non-interest income increased to 36% of total income (2007: 32%) partly reflecting continued focus on cross sales and efficient balance sheet utilisation. Net fee and commission income increased 15% (£111m) to £861m (2007: £750m) due to increased income from foreign exchange, derivative sales and debt fee income.

Income from principal transactions fell to £22m (2007: £56m) due to lower equity realisations.

Other income of £105m (2007: £11m) included a £39m gain arising from the restructuring of Barclays interest in a third party finance operation. This gain was offset by a broadly similar tax charge. Other income also included £29m (2007: £7m) rental income from operating leases.


Highlights

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

Key facts

    

2008 

 

  

2007 

 

  

2006 

 

 

Number of customers

  81,200   83,800   77,100 

Number of colleagues

  9,800   9,200   8,100 

BarclaysAnnual Report 200835


LOGO

Impairment charges increased 42% (£122m) to £414m (2007: £292m) primarily reflecting higher impairment losses in Larger Business, particularly in the final quarter as the UK corporate credit environment deteriorated. Impairment as a percentage of period-end loans and advances to customers and banks increased to 0.60% (2007: 0.45%).

Operating expenses increased 14% (£134m) to £1,063m (2007: £929m) reflecting lower gains on the sale of property of £10m (2007: £40m), investment in a new payments capability (2008: £69m, 2007: £42m), growth in the operating lease business (2008: £31m, 2007: £7m) and investment in risk and operations infrastructure, sales force capability and product specialists.

2007/06

Barclays Commercial Bank profit before tax decreased £5m to £1,357m (2006: £1,365m)£1,362m) due to continued good income growth partially offset by lower gains from business disposals. Profit excluding profit onbefore business disposals of £14mincreased 4% to £1,343m (2006: £76m) increased 5% to £1,357m (2006: £1,289m)£1,286m).

Income increased 7% (£159m)160m) to £2,554m£2,564m (2006: £2,395m)£2,404m). Non-interest income increased to 32% of total income (2006: 29%), reflecting continuing focus on cross sales and efficient balance sheet utilisation. There was very strong growth in net fee and commission income, which increased 17% (£107m) to £749m£750m (2006: £642m)£643m) due to very strong performance in lending fees. There was also good growth in transaction

related income, foreign exchange and derivatives transactions undertaken on behalf of clients.

Net interest income improved 2% (£36m)37m) to £1,738m£1,747m (2006: £1,702m)£1,710m). Average customer lendings increased 3% to £53.6bn£53.9bn (2006: £52.0bn)£52.3bn). Average customer accounts grew 4% to £46.4bn (2006: £44.8bn).

Income from principal transactions primarily reflecting venture capital and other equity realisations increased 87% (£26m) to £56m (2006: £30m).

Impairment charges increased 15% (£38m)39m) to £290m£292m (2006: £252m)£253m), mainly due to a higher level of impairment losses in Larger Business as impairment trended towards risk tendency. There was a reduction in impairment levels in Medium Business due to a tightening of the lending criteria.

Operating expenses increased 6%7%50m)61m) to £907m£929m (2006: £857m)£868m). Operating expenses are net of gains of £39m (2006: £60m) on the sale of property. Growth in operating expenses was focused on continuing investment in operations, infrastructure, and new initiatives in product development and sales capability.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

15


LOGOBarclays Commercial Bank

 

  

2007

£m

   

2006

£m

   

2005

£m

 
  

2008

£m

 

   

2007

£m

 

   

2006

£m

 

 

Income statement information

                

Net interest income

   1,738     1,702     1,536    1,757     1,747     1,710 

Net fee and commission income

   749     642     589    861     750     643 

Net trading income

   9     2         3     9     2 

Net investment income

   47     28     17    19     47     28 

Principal transactions

   56     30     17    22     56     30 

Other income

   11     21     17    105     11     21 

Total income

   2,554     2,395     2,159    2,745     2,564     2,404 

Impairment charges

   (290)      (252)      (177)  

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

   (414)    (292)    (253)

Net income

   2,264     2,143     1,982    2,331     2,272     2,151 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (903)      (856)      (822)     (1,048)    (924)    (867)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (4)      (1)      (3)     (15)    (5)    (1)

Operating expenses

   (907)      (857)      (825)     (1,063)    (929)    (868)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

        3     3    (2)         3 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

   14     76              14     76 

Profit before tax

   1,371     1,365     1,160    1,266     1,357     1,362 

Balance sheet information

                

Loans and advances to customers

  £63.3bn    £56.3bn    £53.4bn   £67.5bn    £63.7bn    £56.6bn 

Loans and advances to customers including those designated at fair value

  £80.5bn    £70.7bn    £62.1bn 

Customer accounts

  £60.8bn    £57.4bn    £50.9bn   £60.6bn    £60.8bn    £57.4bn 

Total assets

  £73.9bn    £65.9bn    £59.9bn   £84.0bn    £74.6bn    £66.2bn 

Selected statistical measures

         

Cost:income ratioa

   36%    36%    38%

Risk Tendencya

  £305m    £290m    £250m 

Risk weighted assets

  £53.8bn    £50.0bn    £47.1bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost:income ratio

   39%     36%     36% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £400m    £305m    £300m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £63.1bn    £57.0bn    £50.3bn 

Note

 

aDefined on page 2.Risk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

2006/05

Barclays Commercial Bank profit before tax increased 18% (£205m) to £1,365m (2005: £1,160m), driven by continued strong income growth. Barclays Commercial Bank maintained its market share of primary customer relationships. The 2006 result included a £23m (2005: £13m) contribution from the full year consolidation of Iveco Finance, in which a 51% stake was acquired on 1st June 2005. Profit before business disposals increased 11% to £1,289m (2005: £1,160m).

Income increased 11% (£236m) to £2,395m (2005: £2,159m), driven by strong balance sheet growth. The uplift in income was broadly based across income categories.

Net interest income increased 11% (£166m) to £1,702m (2005: £1,536m) driven by strong balance sheet growth. There was strong growth in all business areas and in particular Larger Business. The lending margin improved slightly. Average customer accounts increased 11% to £44.8bn (2005: £40.5bn) with good growth across product categories. The deposit margin was stable.

Net fee and commission income increased 9% (£53m) to £642m

(2005: £589m). There was a strong rise in income from foreign exchange and derivatives business transacted through Barclays Capital on behalf of Barclays Commercial Bank customers.

Income from principal transactions was £30m (2005: £17m), primarily reflecting the profit realised on a number of equity investments.

As expected, impairment rates trended upwards during the year towards a more normalised level. Impairment increased 42% (£75m) to £252m (2005: £177m), with the increase mainly reflecting higher charges from Medium Business and balance growth. Impairment charges in Larger Business were stable.

Operating expenses increased 4% (£32m) to £857m (2005: £825m). Cost growth reflected higher volumes, increased expenditure on front line staff and the costs of Iveco Finance for a full year. Operating expenses included a credit of £60m on the sale and leaseback of property. Increased investment was focused on the acceleration of the rationalisation of operating sites and technology infrastructure.

The cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 36% (2005: 38%).

Profit on disposals of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures of £76m (2005: £nil) arose from the sales of interests in vehicle leasing and European vendor finance businesses.


 

1636 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Barclaycard

Who we are

We areBarclaycard is a multi-brand international credit card, and consumer lending and payment processing business. Our credit card was the first to be launched in the UK in 1966 and is now one of the leading credit card businesses in Europe, with a fast growing business in the US.United States and South Africa.

What we do

In the UK

Our our activities include all Barclaycard branded credit cards, the FirstPlus secured lending business and theBarclays Partner Finance, our retail finance business Barclays Partner Finance.business. In addition to these activities, Barclaycard also operates partnership cards with leading brands including SkyCard and the Thomas Cook Credit Card.such as SkyCard. We continue to lead the UK market and we strengthened our position in 2008 with the launch in 2007purchase of Barclaycard OnePulse, the UK’s first contactless card, and Barclaycard Breathe, the first cardGoldfish portfolio, adding more than 1m customers to donate a percentage of its profits to carbon reduction projects around the world.

Internationalour growing customer base.

Barclaycard’s international presence is extensive. In 2007, 3 out of every 4 cards issued by Barclaycard werecontinues to grow very strongly, with international customers now almost equalling the number in markets outside the UK and we have 8.8m international cards in issue.UK. We currently operate across Europein Germany, South Africa and the United States, where we are one of the fastest growingfastest-growing credit card business.businesses. In Scandinavia, we operate through Entercard, a joint venture with Swedbank.

Barclaycard Business

Our payment processing business, Barclaycard Business, processes card payments for 93,00089,000 retailers and merchants, and issues credit and charge cards to corporate customers and the UK Government. It is Europe’s number one issuer of Visa Commercial Cards with over 137,000132,000 corporate customers.

Highlights

Performance

2008/07

Barclaycard profit before tax increased 31% (£186m) to £789m (2007: £603m), driven by strong international income growth and lower UK impairment charges. 2008 profit included £40m from the acquisition of, and contribution from, Goldfish, Discover’s UK credit card business, acquired on 31st March 2008. The scale of the UK and international businesses increased substantially with total customer numbers up 31% to 23.3m.

Income increased 27% (£689m) to £3,219m (2007: £2,530m), reflecting strong growth in Barclaycard International and £156m from the inclusion of Goldfish, partially offset by a decline in FirstPlus following its closure to new business.

Net interest income increased 30% (£412m) to £1,786m (2007: £1,374m), driven by 58% growth in international average extended credit card balances to £5.2bn.

Net fee and commission income increased 14% (£156m) to £1,299m (2007: £1,143m), driven by growth in Barclaycard International.

Investment income increased £69m to £80m (2007: £11m), reflecting a £64m gain from the Visa IPO and a £16m gain from the sale of shares in MasterCard.

Other income increased £44m to £19m (2007: £25m loss), reflecting a gain from a portfolio sale in the United States. 2007 results reflected a £27m loss on disposal of part of the Monument card portfolio.

Impairment charges increased 33% (£270m) to £1,097m (2007: £827m), reflecting £252m growth in charges in the international businesses and £68m from the inclusion of Goldfish. These factors were partially offset by £50m lower impairment in the other UK businesses with reduced flows into delinquency and lower levels of arrears.


 

LOGO

Highlights

LOGO

Performance indicators

LOGO

 

Key facts

            
    

2008

 

  

2007

 

  

2006

 

 

Number of Barclaycard UK customers

   11.7m   10.1m   9.8m
UK credit cards – average outstanding balances  £9.9bn  £8.4bn  £9.4bn
UK credit cards – average extended credit balances  £8.0bn  £6.9bn  £8.0bn
Number of Barclaycard      
International customers   11.6m   7.7m   6.0m
International – average outstanding balance  £6.5bn  £4.1bn  £3.1bn
International – average extended credit balances  £5.2bn  £3.3bn  £2.5bn
Secured lending – average outstanding balance  £4.7bn  £4.3bn  £3.4bn
Number of retailer relationships   89,000   93,000   93,000

 

BarclaysAnnual Report 200837


LOGO

Performance indicatorsOperating expenses increased 30% (£329m) to £1,422m (2007: £1,093m), reflecting continued international growth and increased marketing investment. Operating expenses reflected Goldfish expenses of £140m, including restructuring costs of £64m.

LOGOThe acquisition of Goldfish resulted in a gain on acquisition of £92m.

PerformanceBarclaycard International maintained its strong growth momentum, delivering a 71% (£108m) increase in profit before tax to £260m (2007: £152m). Barclaycard US profit before tax was US$249m which exceeded delivery of the financial plan of US$150m set out at the time of acquisition. Strong balance sheet growth in Barclaycard US included US$1.9bn of credit card receivables acquired from FIA Card Services in August 2008, furthering the existing partnership agreement with US Airways. The acquisition of a majority stake in Woolworths Financial Services in October 2008, added 1.6 million customers to the existing Absa credit card business in South Africa. The Entercard joint venture with Swedbank continued to build presence in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

2007/06

Barclaycard profit before tax increased 18%16%82m)81m) to £540m£603m (2006: £458m)£522m), driven by strong international growth coupled with a significant improvement in UK impairment charges. Other income included a £27m loss on disposal of part of the Monument card portfolio. 2006 results reflected a property gain of £38m.

Income decreased 1%2%28m)46m) to £2,486m£2,530m (2006: £2,514m)£2,576m), reflecting strong growth in Barclaycard International, offset by a decline in UK Cards revenue resulting from a more cautious approach to lending in the UK and a £27m loss on disposal of part of the Monument card portfolio.

Net interest income increased 1% (£11m) to £1,394m£1,374m (2006: £1,383m)£1,363m), due to strong organic growth in international average

extended credit card balances, up 32% to £3.3bn and average secured consumer lending balances up 26% to £4.3bn, partially offset by lower UK average extended credit card balances which fell 14% to £6.9bn. Margins fell to 6.59% (2006: 7.13%) due to higher average base rates across core operating markets and a change in the product mix with an increased weighting to secured lending.

Net fee and commission income fell 2%3%26m)40m) to £1,080m£1,143m (2006: £1,106m)£1,183m), with growth in Barclaycard International offset by our actions in response to the Office of Fair Trading’s findings on late and overlimit fees in the UK which were implemented in August 2006.

Impairment charges improved 21% (£229m)226m) to £838m£827m (2006: £1,067m)£1,053m), reflecting reduced flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and lower charge-offs in UK Cards. We made changes to our impairment methodologies to standardise our approach and in anticipation of Basel II. The net positive impact of these changes in methodology was offset by an increase in impairment charges in Barclaycard International and secured consumer lending.

Operating expenses increased 12%10%120m)100m) to £1,101m£1,093m (2006: £981m)£993m). Excluding a property gain of £38m in 2006, operating expenses increased 8%6%82m)62m), reflecting continued investment in expanding our businesses in Europe and the US.United States. Costs in the UK businesses were broadly flat, with investment in new UK product innovations such as Barclaycard OnePulse being funded out of operating efficiencies.

Barclaycard International continued to gain momentum, delivering a profit before tax of £77m£152m against a lossprofit before tax of £36m£8m in 2006. We concluded seven new credit card partnership deals across Western Europe. The Entercard joint venture continued to perform ahead of plan and entered the Danish market, extending its reach across the Scandinavian region. Barclaycard US was profitable, with very strong average balance growth and a number of new card partnerships, including Lufthansa Airlines and Princess Cruise Lines.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

17


LOGOBarclaycard

 

  2008   2007   2006 
  

2007

£m

   

2006

£m

   

2005

£m

    £m     £m     £m 

Income statement information

                

Net interest income

   1,394     1,383     1,231    1,786     1,374     1,363 

Net fee and commission income

   1,080     1,106     1,065    1,299     1,143     1,183 

Net tracking income

   2           

Net investment income

   11     15         80     11     20 

Principal transactions

   82     11     20 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   40     18     6    44     40     18 

Other income

   (26)             19     (25)     

Total income

   2,499     2,522     2,302    3,230     2,543     2,584 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

   (13)    (8)    (3)   (11)    (13)    (8)

Total income net of insurance claims

   2,486     2,514     2,299    3,219     2,530     2,576 

Impairment charges

   (838)    (1,067)    (753)

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

   (1,097)    (827)    (1,053)

Net income

   1,648     1,447     1,546    2,122     1,703     1,523 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (1,073)    (964)    (891)   (1,361)    (1,057)    (969)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (28)    (17)    (17)   (61)    (36)    (24)

Operating expenses

   (1,101)    (981)    (908)   (1,422)    (1,093)    (993)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

   (7)    (8)    1    (3)    (7)    (8)

Gain on acquisition

   92           

Profit before tax

   540     458     639    789     603     522 

Balance sheet information

                

Loans and advances to customers

  £20.1bn    £18.2bn    £16.5bn   £27.4bn    £19.7bn    £18.1bn 

Total assets

  £22.2bn    £20.1bn    £18.2bn   £30.9bn    £22.1bn    £20.0bn 

Selected statistical measures

         

Cost:income ratioa

   44%    39%    39%

Risk Tendencya

  £945m    £1,135m    £865m 

Risk weighted assets

  £19.9bn    £17.0bn    £13.6bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost: income ratio

   44%     43%     39% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £1,475m    £955m    £1,090m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £27.3bn    £20.2bn    £16.9bn 

Note

 

aDefined on page 2.Risk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

2006/05

Barclaycard profit before tax decreased 28% (£181m) to £458m (2005: £639m) as good income growth was more than offset by higher impairment charges and increased costs from the continued development of international businesses.

Income increased 9% (£215m) to £2,514m (2005: £2,299m) reflecting very strong momentum in Barclaycard US and strong performances in Barclaycard Business, FirstPlus, SkyCard and continental European markets.

Net interest income increased 12% (£152m) to £1,383m (2005: £1,231m) due to strong growth in International average extended credit card balances up 39% to £2.5bn (2005: £1.8bn) and average secured consumer lending balances up 55% to £3.4bn (2005: £2.2bn), partly offset by UK average extended credit card balances down 7% to £8.0bn (2005: £8.6bn), reflecting the impact of tighter lending criteria.

Net fee and commission income increased 4% (£41m) to £1,106m (2005: £1,065m) as a result of increased contributions from Barclaycard International, SkyCard, FirstPlus and Barclaycard Business. Barclaycard reduced its late and overlimit fee charges in the UK on 1st August 2006 in response to the Office of Fair Trading’s findings.

Investment income of £15m (2005: £nil) represents the gain arising from the sale of part of the stake in MasterCard Inc, following its flotation.

Impairment charges increased 42% (£314m) to £1,067m (2005: £753m). The increase was driven by a rise in delinquent balances and increased numbers of bankruptcies and Individual Voluntary Arrangements. As a result of management action in 2005 and 2006 to tighten lending criteria and improve collection processes, the flows of new delinquencies reduced, and levels of arrears balances declined in the second half of 2006 in UK cards.

Operating expenses increased 8% (£73m) to £981m (2005: £908m). This included a £38m gain from the sale and leaseback of property. Excluding this item, underlying operating expenses increased 12% (£111m) to £1,019m. This was largely as a result of continued investment in Barclaycard International, particularly Barclaycard US, and the development of UK partnerships.

Barclaycard International continued its growth strategy in the continental European business delivering solid results. The Entercard joint venture, which is based in Scandinavia, performed ahead of plan. Barclaycard International loss before tax reduced to £36m (2005: loss £44m), including the loss before tax for Barclaycard US of £57m (2005: loss £60m). Barclaycard US continued to perform ahead of expectations, delivering very strong growth in balances and customer numbers and creating a number of new partnerships including US Airways, Barnes & Noble, Travelocity and Jo-Ann Stores.

Barclaycard UK customer numbers declined 1.4 million to 9.8 million (2005: 11.2 million). This reflected the closure of 1.5 million accounts that had been inactive.


 

1838 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Western Europe

GRCB – Western Europe comprises our retail and commercial banking operations as well as our Barclaycard businesses in Spain, Portugal, France and Italy.

International Retail and Commercial Banking

Who we are

Our business comprises: International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa and International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa.

What we do

International RetailGRCB – Western Europe serves more than 2m retail and Commercial Bankingcommercial banking customers in France, Italy, Portugal and Spain through a variety of distribution channels including 961 branches, 184 sales centres and 988 ATMs.

GRCB – Western Europe provides banking services to Barclays personal and corporate customers outside the UK. Thea variety of products and services offeredincluding retail mortgages, current and deposit accounts, commercial lending, unsecured lending, credit cards, investments and insurance products, serving the needs of Barclays retail, mass affluent and corporate customers.

Performance

2008/07

GRCB – Western Europe profit before tax grew 31% (£61m) to customers are tailored£257m (2007: £196m), despite challenging market conditions in Spain and accelerated investment in the expansion of the franchise. Distribution points increased 347 to meet customer needs1,145 (2007: 798), including 149 in Italy. Strong income growth including gains of £82m from the Visa IPO and the regulatorysale of shares in MasterCard was partially offset by increased impairment and higher operating costs. Profit before tax was favourably impacted by the 16% appreciation in the average value of the Euro against Sterling.

Income increased 53% (£493m) to £1,430m (2007: £937m), reflecting growth in both net interest income and net fee and commission income.

Net interest income increased 62% (£329m) to £856m (2007: £527m), driven by a 63% increase in customer liabilities to £15.3bn (2007: £9.4bn) and a 53% increase in customer assets to £53.5bn (2007: £35.0bn).

Net fee and commission income increased 19% (£61m) to £383m (2007: £322m). Increased fees in retail and in the life insurance businesses were offset by lower market-related investment revenue.

Principal transactions grew £59m to £165m (2007: £106m) including

gains from the Visa IPO (£65m) and the sale of shares in MasterCard (£17m) which enabled GRCB – Western Europe to invest in the expansion of the business.

Impairment charges increased £220m to £296m (2007: £76m). This increase was principally due to higher charges in Spanish commercial environments within each country.property (£82m) and deterioration of the Spanish credit card portfolio (£66m) as a consequence of the rapid slowdown in the Spanish economy.

Operating expenses increased 38% (£256m) to £929m (2007: £673m), reflecting the rapid expansion of the retail distribution network and the strengthening of the Premier segment. Operating expenses also included £55m (2007: £22m) gains from the sale of property.

Gain on acquisition of £52m (2007: £nil) arose from the purchase of the Italian residential mortgage business of Macquarie Bank Limited in November 2008.

2007/06

GRCB – Western Europe profit before tax increased 21% (£34m) to £196m (2006: £162m). The performance reflected strong income growth driven by an increase in distribution points of 145 to 798 (2006: 653).

Income increased 25% (£186m) to £937m (2006: £751m), reflecting strong growth in net fee and commission income and principal transactions.

Net interest income increased 21% (£91m) to £527m (2006: £436m), driven by a 38% increase in customer liabilities to £9.4bn (2006: £6.8bn) and a 30% increase in customer assets to £35.0bn (2006: £26.9bn).

Net fee and commission income increased 30% (£74m) to £322m (2006: £248m), driven by the expansion of the customer base.

Principal transactions grew 34% (£27m) to £106m (2006: £79m), reflecting gains on equity investments.

Impairment charges grew 100% (£38m) to £76m (2006: £38m), reflecting very strong balance sheet growth.

Operating expenses grew 22% (£123m) to £673m (2006: £550m), driven by the expansion of the distribution network. Operating expenses included property sales in Spain of £22m (2006: £55m).


Highlights
LOGO

 

LOGO

Performance indicators
LOGO

 

Performance 2007/06

International Retail and Commercial Banking profit before tax decreased £281m to £935m (2006: £1,216m). International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa profit before tax in 2006 included a £247m gain on the sale of associate FirstCaribbean International Bank and a £41m share of its post-tax results. Profit before tax in 2007 included gains from the sale and leaseback of property of £23m (2006: £55m). Very strong profit growth in Rand terms in International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa was offset by a 12% decline in the average value of the Rand.

A significant investment was made in infrastructure and distribution, including the opening of 644 new branches and sales centres across Western Europe, Emerging Markets and Absa.

2006/05

International Retail and Commercial Banking profit before tax increased £623m to £1,216m (2005: £593m). The increase reflected the inclusion of a full year’s profit before tax from International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa of £698m (2005a: £298m) and a profit of £247m on the disposal of Barclays interest in FirstCaribbean International Bank.

Key facts      
    2008  2007  2006

Number of distribution points

  1,145  798  653
      

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

19


LOGO

   2007
£m
      2006
£m
      2005
£m
 

Income statement information

       

Net interest income

  1,890     1,653     1,045 

Net fee and commission income

  1,210     1,221     644 

Net trading income

  69     6     3 

Net investment income

  179     188     143 

Principal transactions

  248     194     146 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  372     351     227 

Other income

  87      74      60 

Total income

  3,807     3,493     2,122 

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts

  (284)     (244)     (206)

Total income net of insurance claims

  3,523     3,249     1,916 

Impairment charges

  (252)     (167)     (33)

Net income

  3,271     3,082     1,883 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (2,279)    (2,077)    (1,289)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (77)    (85)    (47)

Operating expenses

  (2,356)    (2,162)    (1,336)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  7     49     46 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  13      247       

Profit before tax

  935      1,216      593 

Balance sheet information

       

Loans and advances to customers

 £70.1bn    £53.2bn    £49.2bn 

Customer accounts

 £28.8bn    £22.1bn    £22.4bn 

Total assets

 £89.5bn     £68.6bn     £63.4bn 

Selected statistical measures

                  

Cost:income ratioa

  67%     67%     70%

Risk Tendencya

 £475m    £220m    £175m 

Risk weighted assets

 £53.3bn     £40.8bn     £41.0bn 

aDefined on page 2.

20 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 39


LOGO

GRCB – Western Europe

    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   856     527     436 

Net fee and commission income

   383     322     248 

Net trading income

   4     13     14 

Net investment income

   161     93     65 

Principal transactions

   165     106     79 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   352     145     110 

Other income

   39      7      16 

Total income

   1,795     1,107     889 

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts

   (365)     (170)     (138)

Total income net of insurance claims

   1,430     937     751 

Impairment charges

   (296)     (76)     (38)

Net income

   1,134     861     713 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (915)    (665)    (542)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (14)    (8)    (8)

Operating expenses

   (929)    (673)    (550)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

             (1)

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

        8      

Gain on acquisition

   52             

Profit before tax

   257      196      162 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £53.5bn    £35.0bn    £26.9bn 

Customer accounts

  £15.3bn    £9.4bn    £6.8bn 

Total assets

  £64.7bn     £43.7bn     £33.5bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost: income ratio

   65%      72%      73% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £270m    £135m    £90m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £36.5bn     £25.0bn     £17.6bn 

Note

aRisk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

40

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa

Who we are

Western Europe

This business area includes our retail and commercial banking operations in Spain, Portugal, France and Italy. Barclays has operated in Spain for over 30 years, and is the leading foreign bank and the sixth largest banking group overall. We have tripled the branch network in Portugal over the last two years, becoming the largest non-Iberian bank. Barclays is a leading affluent banking brand and a recognised product innovator in France. We are one of the leading mortgage providers in Italy and in 2007 established full retail and commercial banking operations.

Emerging Markets

TheGRCB – Emerging Markets team is responsible for Barclays businesses in the growing markets of Africa, India and the Middle East. Barclays has long-standing commercial banking operations in the UAE and in 2007 launched retail banking operations in India and the UAE. In Africa, Barclays operates in Botswana, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Seychelles, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe offering a range ofcomprises our retail and commercial banking products.operations, as well as our Barclaycard businesses, in 14 countries across Africa, the Middle East and South East Asia.

What we do

WeGRCB – Emerging Markets serves retail and commercial banking customers in Botswana, Egypt, Ghana, India, Kenya, Mauritius, Pakistan, Russia, Seychelles, Tanzania, Uganda, the UAE, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Through a network of more than 830 distribution points and 1,440 ATMs, we provide 4.2m customers and clients with a full range of banking services, includingproducts and services. This includes current accounts, savings, investments, mortgages and secured and unsecured lending.

Performance

2008/07

GRCB – Emerging Markets profit before tax increased 34% (£34m) to £134m (2007: £100m). Very strong income growth, including £82m from the Visa IPO and the sale of shares in MasterCard, absorbed the increased investment across existing and new markets and higher impairment charges. The number of distribution points increased 286 to 836 (2007: 550). New market entries in 2008 comprised the acquisition of Expobank in Russia, the launch of a new business in Pakistan and the announced acquisition of Bank Akita in Indonesia.

Income increased 91% (£486m) to £1,019m (2007: £533m), reflecting growth in lending, deposit taking and fee-driven transactional revenues.

Net interest income increased 93% (£297m) to £616m (2007: £319m), loans and advances to our international personal and corporate customers.customers increased 98% to £10.1bn (2007: £5.1bn). Customer accounts increased 55% to £9.6bn (2007: £6.2bn).


International Retail and Commercial Banking works closely with all other parts of the group to leverage synergies from product and service propositions.

Highlights
LOGO

 

LOGOPerformance indicators

LOGO

Performance indicators

LOGO

Performance

Key facts

 

    2008  2007  2006

Number of distribution points

  836  550  214


BarclaysAnnual Report 200841


LOGO

Net fee and commission income increased 59% (£83m) to £223m (2007: £140m), primarily driven by very strong growth in commercial banking and treasury fee income.

Principal transactions increased £97m to £169m (2007: £72m), reflecting higher foreign exchange income, a gain of £68m relating to the Visa IPO and a gain of £14m from the sale of shares in MasterCard.

Impairment charges increased £127m to £166m (2007: £39m), reflecting higher assets and delinquencies, particularly in India and increased wholesale impairment in Africa.

Operating expenses increased 82% (£324m) to £719m (2007: £395m), reflecting continued investment in new markets and expansion of the business in existing markets, with investment in infrastructure and the roll-out of global platforms.

2007/06

International Retail and Commercial BankingGRCBexcluding AbsaEmerging Markets profit before tax decreased 53% (£272m)74% to £246m£100m (2006: £518m)£384m). Profit before taxThe performance in 2006 included a £247m gain onreflected the sale of associate FirstCaribbeanFirst Carribean International Bank andwhich resulted in a profit of £247m in December 2006. In addition, profits of £41m sharewere generated by the First Carribean business up to date of its post-tax results. Profit before tax in 2007 included gains fromsale. Excluding First Carribean, the sale and leaseback of property in 2007 of £23m (2006: £55m). The performance reflected very strong income growth driven by a rapid growth

in distribution points to 1,348550 (2006: 867)214), as well as the launch of new businesses in India and UAE and a full retail and commercial banking offering in Italy.UAE.

Income increased 28%35%293m)137m) to £1,339m£533m (2006: £1,046m)£396m) driven by new business in India and UAE and excellent performances in Western EuropeEgypt, Kenya and Emerging Markets.Ghana.

Net interest income increased 25%30%149m)73m) to £753m£319m (2006: £604m)£246m). Total average customer loans increased 22%89%6.1bn)2.4bn) to £33.3bn£5.1bn (2006: £27.2bn)£2.7bn) with lending margins broadly stable. Mortgage balance growth in Western Europe was very strong,improving with average Euro balances up 16% (€4.2bn) to €30.1bn (2006: €25.9bn). Average customerchanging product mix. Customer deposits increased 20%47%2.1bn)2.0bn) to £12.5bn£6.2bn (2006: £10.4bn)£4.2bn), driven by growth in Western Europe and Emerging Markets.across the markets.

Net fee and commission income grew 16%declined marginally59m)1m) to £425m£140m (2006: £366m), reflecting strong performances in Western Europe driven by the expansion of the customer base.£141m).

Principal transactions increased £94m£68m to £177m£72m (2006: £83m)£4m), reflecting gains on equity investments and higher foreign exchange income across Emerging Markets.markets.

Impairment charges rose 93%30%38m)9m) to £79m£39m (2006: £41m)£30m). The increase reflected very strong balance sheet growth in 2006 and 2007 and the impact of lower releases in 2007.

Operating expenses grew 32%46%249m)125m) to £1,023m£395m (2006: £774m)£270m), driven by the rapid expansion of the distribution network across all regionsmarkets and investment in people and infrastructure to support future growth across the franchise. Operating expenses included property sales in Spain of £23m (2006: £55m).


Western Europe continued to perform strongly. Profit before tax increased 30% (£56m) to £245m (2006: £189m). Barclays Spain profit before tax increased 53% (£72m) to £207m (2006: £135m) driven by increased customer lending, higher service commissions and equity investment realisations. France also performed well driven by good growth in the balance sheet, higher fees and commissions and good cost control. Income grew very strongly in Italy as a result of the opening of new branches and the roll-out of a complete retail and commercial banking offering but this was more than offset by higher investment costs. Profit before tax decreased in Portugal, with very strong income growth offset by increased investment in the expansion of the business.

GRCB – Emerging Markets profit before tax increased 25% (£28m) to £142m (2006: £114m) reflecting a very strong rise in income across a broad range of markets, with particularly strong growth in Egypt, UAE, Kenya, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and India. The income growth benefited from increased investment in the business across all geographies, including branch openings and the launch of retail banking services in India and the UAE.


    2008
£m
      2007
£m
      2006
£m
 
Income statement information        
Net interest income   616     319     246 
Net fee and commission income   223     140     141 
Net trading income   78     56     3 
Net investment income   91     16     1 
Principal transactions   169     72     4 
Net premiums from insurance contracts             1 
Other income   11      2      4 
Total income   1,019      533      396 
Impairment charges   (166)     (39)     (30)
Net income   853     494     366 
Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets   (711)    (391)    (269)
Amortisation of intangible assets   (8)    (4)    (1)
Operating expenses   (719)    (395)    (270)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures        1     41 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures               247 
Profit before tax   134      100      384 
Balance sheet information        
Loans and advances to customers  £10.1bn    £5.1bn    £2.7bn 
Customer accounts  £9.6bn    £6.2bn    £4.2bn 
Total assets  £14.7bn     £9.2bn     £5.2bn 
Performance ratios        
Cost: income ratio   71%      74%      68% 
Other financial measures        
Risk Tendency  £350m    £140m    £35m 
Risk weighted assetsa  £15.1bn     £10.5bn     £3.3bn 

Note

aRisk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

21


LOGO

   
 
2007
£m
 
 
      
 
2006
£m
 
 
      
 
2005
£m
 
 

Income statement information

         

Net interest income

  753      604      557 

Net fee and commission income

  425      366      316 

Net trading income

  68      17      31 

Net investment income

  109      66      88 

Principal transactions

  177      83      119 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  145      111      129 

Other income

  9       20       23 

 

Total income

  1,509      1,184      1,144 

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts

  (170)      (138)      (162)

Total income net of insurance claims

  1,339      1,046      982 

Impairment charges

  (79)      (41)      (14)

 

Net income

  1,260      1,005      968 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (1,007)     (765)     (706)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (16)     (9)     (6)

Operating expenses

  (1,023)     (774)     (712)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  1      40      39 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  8       247        

 

Profit before tax

  246       518       295 

 

Balance sheet information

         

Loans and advances to customers

 £39.3bn     £29.0bn     £25.3bn 

Customer accounts

 £15.7bn     £11.0bn     £10.2bn 

Total assets

 £52.2bn      £38.2bn      £34.0bn 

Selected statistical measures

                    

Cost:income ratioa

  76%       74%       73% 

Risk Tendencya

  £220m      £75m      £75m 

Risk weighted assets

 £29.7bn      £20.1bn      £20.2bn 

aDefined on page 2.

2006/05

International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa profit before tax increased 76% (£223m) to £518m (2005: £295m), including a gain on the disposal of the interest in FirstCaribbean International Bank of £247m. This reflected good growth in continental Europe offset by a decline in profits in Africa caused by higher impairment, and increased costs reflecting a step change in the rate of organic investment in the business.

Income increased 7% (£64m) to £1,046m (2005: £982m).

Net interest income increased 8% (£47m) to £604m (2005: £557m), reflecting strong balance sheet growth in continental Europe, Africa and the Middle East, and the development of the corporate business in Spain.

Total average customer loans increased 20% to £27.2bn (2005: £22.7bn). Mortgage balance growth in continental Europe was particularly strong, with average Euro balances up 22%. There was a modest decline in lending margins partly driven by a greater share of mortgage assets as a proportion of the total book in continental Europe. Average customer deposits increased 16% to £10.4bn (2005: £9.0bn), with deposit margins stable.

Net fee and commission income increased 16% (£50m) to £366m (2005: £316m). This reflected a strong performance from the Spanish funds business, where average assets under management increased 11%, together with very strong growth in France, including the first full year contribution of the ING Ferri business which was acquired on 1st July 2005. Net fee and commission income showed solid growth in Africa and the Middle East.

Principal transactions decreased £36m to £83m (2005: £119m). 2005 included £23m from the redemption of preference shares in FirstCaribbean International Bank.

Impairment charges increased £27m to £41m (2005: £14m). This reflected the absence of one-off recoveries of £12m which arose in 2005 in Africa and the Middle East, and strong balance sheet growth across the businesses.

Operating expenses increased 9% (£62m) to £774m (2005: £712m). This included gains from the sale and leaseback of property in Spain of £55m. Operating expenses also included incremental investment expenditure of £25m to expand the distribution network and enhance IT and operational capabilities.

Barclays Spain continued to perform strongly. Profit before tax increased 21% (£30m) to £171m (2005: £141m), excluding net one-off gains on asset sales of £32m (2005: £8m) and integration costs of £43m (2005: £57m). This was driven by the continued realisation of benefits from Banco Zaragozano, together with strong growth in assets under management and solid growth in mortgages.

Africa and the Middle East profit before tax decreased 9% (£12m) to £126m (2005: £138m) driven by higher impairment charges reflecting one-off recoveries of £12m that arose in 2005 and an increase in investment expenditure.

Profit before tax increased strongly in Portugal reflecting good flows of new customers and increased business volumes. France also performed well as a result of good organic growth and the acquisition of ING Ferri.

The profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associate and joint ventures of £247m (2005: £nil) comprised the gain on the sale of Barclays interest in FirstCaribbean International Bank. The share of post-tax results of FirstCaribbean International Bank included in 2006 was £41m (2005: £37m).


2242 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Absa

International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa

Who we are

This business represents Barclays consolidation of Absa, excluding Absa Capital which is included in Barclays Capital.

International Retail and Commercial BankingGRCB – Absa comprises fourthree operating divisions: Retail Banking, Commercial Banking African operations and a Bancassurance division. (Barclays Bank PLC owns 59%The Absa Group’s other businesses are Absa Capital and Absa Card, which are included in Barclays Capital and Barclaycard respectively.

What we do

GRCB – Absa forms part of Absa Group Limited).

What we do

International Retail and Commercial BankingLimited, one of South Africa’s largest financial services groups, listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Limited. GRCB – Absa serves retail customers through a variety of distribution channels and offers a fullcomplete range of banking products and services, including current and deposit accounts, savings products, bancassurance, mortgages, instalment finance credit cards, bancassurance products and wealth management services.management. It also offers customised business solutions for commercial and large corporate customers.

HighlightsAbsa’s business is conducted primarily in South Africa. In addition to this, the Group has equity holdings in banks in Mozambique, Angola and Tanzania.

Absa serves more than 10m customers through a range of physical channels that include 1,177 distribution points and 8,719 ATMs, as well as electronic channels such as telephone and online banking.

 

LOGO

Performance indicators

LOGO2008/07

Performance

2007/06

InternationalGlobal Retail and Commercial Banking -– Absa

GRCB – Absa profit before tax decreased 8% (£45m) to £689m (2006: £698m)£552m (2007: £597m), owing to challenging market conditions and the 7% depreciation in the average value of the Rand against Sterling. Profit before tax included a gain of £47m relating to the Visa IPO. Very strong Rand income growth was partially offset by increased impairment and investment in the expansion of the franchise by 176 distribution points to 1,177 (2007: 1,001).

Total income increased 10% (£211m) to £2,324m (2007: £2,113m).

Net interest income improved 5% (£49m) to £1,104m (2007: £1,055m) reflecting strong balance sheet growth. Average customer assets increased 9% to £27.7bn (2007: £25.3bn), primarily driven by retail and commercial mortgages and commercial cheque accounts. Average customer liabilities increased 17% to £13.5bn (2007: £11.5bn), primarily driven by retail savings.

Net fee and commission income increased 11% (£78m) to £762m (2007: £684m), underpinned by retail transaction volume growth.


Highlights

LOGO

Performance indicators

LOGO

 

Key facts

 

      
    2008  2007  2006

Number of ATMs

  8,719  8,162  7,411

Number of corporate customers

  107,000  100,000  84,000

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

 23BarclaysAnnual Report 2008
 43


LOGOLOGO

   2007
£m
       2006
£m
      2005
£m
 

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

  1,137      1,049     488 

Net fee and commission income

  785      855     328 

Net trading income/(expense)

  1      (11)      (28)

Net investment income

  70      122     55 

Principal transactions

  71      111     27 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  227      240     98 

Other income

  78       54      37 

 

Total income

  2,298      2,309     978 

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts

  (114)      (106)     (44)

 

Total income net of insurance claims

  2,184      2,203     934 

Impairment charges

  (173)      (126)     (19)

 

Net income

  2,011      2,077     915 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (1,272)     (1,312)    (583)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (61)     (76)    (41)

Operating expenses

  (1,333)     (1,388)    (624)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  6      9     7 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  5              

 

Profit before tax

  689       698      298 

 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

 £30.8bn     £24.2bn    £23.9bn 

Customer accounts

 £13.1bn     £11.1bn    £12.2bn 

Total assets

 £37.3bn      £30.4bn     £29.4bn 

Selected statistical measures

                   

Cost:income ratioa

  61%       63%      67% 

Risk Tendencya

  £255m      £145m     £100m 

Risk weighted assets

 £23.6bn      £20.7bn     £20.8bn 

aDefined on page 2.

 

2006/05Principal transactions increased £41m to £111m (2007: £70m) reflecting gains on economic hedges relating to the commercial property finance and liquid asset portfolios.

InternationalOther income increased £36m to £113m (2007: £77m), reflecting a gain of £47m from the Visa IPO.

Impairment charges increased £201m to £347m (2007: £146m) as a result of rising delinquency levels in the retail portfolios, which have been impacted by rising interest and inflation rates and increasing consumer indebtedness.

Operating expenses increased 3% (£38m) to £1,305m (2007: £1,267m). The cost:income ratio improved from 63% to 59%.

2007/06

Global Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa

GRCB – Absa profit before tax decreased 2% (£12m) to £597m (2006: £609m) mainly owing to the weaker currency. The impact of the weaker currency was offset by very good performances from Retail Banking and Absa Corporate and Business Bank. Key factors impacting the results included: very strong asset and income growth; the diversification of earnings in favour of investment banking and commercial banking; an increased 134%retail credit impairment charge, and the achievement of the Absa – Barclays synergy target 18 months ahead of schedule.

Income decreased 2% (£32m) to £698m (2005: £298m) reflecting the full year£1,999m (2006: £2,031m).

Net interest income increased by 7% (£72m) to £1,055m (2006: £983m), driven by growth in loans and advances and deposits at improved margins. Loans and advances to customers increased 27% from 31st December 2006 compared with the five months ended 31st December 2005. Barclays acquired a controlling stakemainly driven by growth of 23% in Absa Group Limited on 27th July 2005.mortgages.

 

Net fee and commission income decreased by 9% (£70m) to £684m (2006: £754m) mainly owing to the weaker currency. The increase in local currency reflects a growth of 3% underpinned by increased transaction volumes in Retail Banking and Absa Corporate and Business Bank.

Principal transactions decreased £36m to £70m (2006: £106m) reflecting losses on economic hedges relating to the commercial property finance and liquid asset portfolios.

Other income increased £23m to £77m (2006: £54m).

Impairment charges increased £34m to £146m (2006: £112m) from the cyclically low levels of recent years, Arrears in retail portfolios increased driven by interest rate increases in 2006 and 2007. Impairment charges as a percentage of loans and advances to customers was 0.49%, ahead of the 0.48% charge in 2006 but within long-term industry averages.

Operating expenses decreased 4% (£52m) to £1,267m (2006: £1,319m), resulting from the realisation of synergy benefits of R1,428m (£100m) thus achieving the synergy target of R1.4bn 18 months ahead of schedule. This was partially offset by the increased investment in new distribution outlets and staff in order to support continued growth in volumes and customers.


 

GRCB – Absa

 

                
    2008
£m
      2007
£m
      2006
£m
 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   1,104     1,055     983 

Net fee and commission income

   762     684     754 

Net trading income/(expense)

   6          (11)

Net investment income

   105     70     117 

Principal transactions

   111     70     106 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   234     227     240 

Other income

   113      77      54 

Total income

   2,324     2,113     2,137 

Net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts

   (126)     (114)     (106)

Total income net of insurance claims

   2,198     1,999     2,031 

Impairment charges

   (347)     (146)     (112)

Net income

   1,851     1,853     1,919 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (1,255)    (1,212)    (1,250)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (50)    (55)    (69)

Operating expenses

   (1,305)    (1,267)    (1,319)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

   5     6     9 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

   1      5       

Profit before tax

   552      597      609 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £32.7bn    £29.9bn    £23.5bn 

Customer accounts

  £17.0bn    £13.0bn    £10.9bn 

Total assets

  £40.4bn     £36.4bn     £29.6bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost:income ratio

   59%      63%      65% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £255m    £190m    £130m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £18.8bn     £17.8bn     £19.8bn 

Note

aRisk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

 

2444 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Investment Banking and Investment Management

Barclays Capital

Barclays Capital

Who we are

Barclays Capital is a leading global investment bank providing large corporate, institutionalgovernment and governmentinstitutional clients with a full spectrum of solutions to their strategic advisory, financing and risk management requirements.needs.

What we do

Barclays Capital serviceis a wide varietyglobal investment bank, which offers clients the full range of client needs, fromservices covering strategic advisory and M&A; equity and fixed income capital raising and managingcorporate lending; and risk management across foreign exchange, interest rate, equityrates, equities and commodity risks, through to providing technical advice and expertise.commodities.

Activities are organised into three principal areas: Rates,Global Markets, which includes fixed income,commodities, credit products, equities, foreign exchange, commodities, emerging markets, money markets, prime services and equityinterest rate products; Credit,Investment Banking, which includes primarycorporate advisory, Mergers and secondary activities for loansAcquisitions, equity and bonds for investment grade, high yieldfixed-income capital raising and emerging market credit, as well as hybrid capital products, asset based finance, mortgage backed securities, credit derivatives, structured capital markets and large asset leasing;corporate lending; and Private Equity.Equity and Principal Investments. Barclays Capital includes Absa Capital, the investment banking business of Absa.

Barclays Capital works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities.

HighlightsPerformance

2008/07

In an exceptionally challenging market environment Barclays Capital profit before tax decreased 44% (£1,033m) to £1,302m (2007: £2,335m). Profit before tax included a gain on the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £2,262m. Absa Capital profit before tax grew 13% to £175m (2007: £155m).

Net income included gross losses of £8,053m (2007: £2,999m) due to continuing dislocation in the credit markets. These losses were partially offset by income and hedges of £1,433m (2007: £706m), and gains of £1,663m (2007: £658m) from the general widening of credit spreads on structured notes issued by Barclays Capital. The gross losses, comprised £6,290m (2007: £2,217m) against income and £1,763m (2007: £782m) in impairment charges. Further detail is provided on page 94.

The integration of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses is complete and the acquired businesses made a positive contribution, with

good results in equities, fixed income and advisory. There was a gain on acquisition of £2,262m. Not included in this gain is expenditure relating to integration of the acquired business.

Income was down 27% at £5,231m (2007: £7,119m) driven by the impact of the market dislocation. There was very strong underlying growth in the US driven by fixed income, prime services and the acquired businesses. In other regions income fell driven by the challenging environment.

Net trading income decreased 60% (£2,233m) to £1,506m (2007: £3,739m) reflecting losses from the credit market dislocation and weaker performance in credit products and equities. This was partially offset by significant growth in interest rates, foreign exchange, emerging markets and prime services. Average DVaR at 95% increased by 64% to £53.4m driven by higher credit spread and interest rate risk.

Net investment income decreased 41% (£394m) to £559m reflecting the market conditions. Net interest income increased 46% (£545m) to £1,724m (2007: £1,179m), driven by strong results in global loans and money markets. Net fee and commission income from advisory and origination activities increased 16% (£194m) to £1,429m. The corporate lending portfolio, including leveraged finance, increased 46% to £76.6bn (31st December 2007: £52.3bn) driven by the decline in the value of Sterling relative to other currencies as well as draw downs on existing loan facilities and the extension of new loans at current terms to financial and manufacturing institutions.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions of £2,423m (2007: £846m) included £1,763m (2007: £782m) due to the credit market dislocation. Other impairment charges of £660m (2007: £64m) principally related to private equity, prime services and the loan book.

Operating expenses fell 5% (£199m) to £3,774m (2007: £3,973m) due to lower performance related pay, partially offset by operating costs of the acquired businesses.

Total headcount increased 6,900 to 23,100 (31st December 2007: 16,200). Prior to the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses, headcount during 2008 was materially unchanged except for hiring associated with the annual global graduate programme. The acquisition initially added 10,000 to the headcount but there were reductions in the fourth quarter as the US businesses were integrated.


Highlights

LOGO

 

Key facts

 

      

League table rankings

  2008  2007  2006

Rankings:

      

Global All Bonds

  1  2  1

US Investment Grade

  3  10  7

US Government Securities Survey

  1  1  8

Foreign Exchange Survey

  3  5  4

US M&A

  4    

 

LOGO

BarclaysAnnual Report 200845

Performance indicators

LOGO


LOGO

 

Performance

2007/06

Barclays Capital delivered profits ahead of the record results achieved in 2006 despite challenging trading conditions in the second half of the year. Profit before tax increased 5% (£119m) to £2,335m (2006: £2,216m). There was strong income growth across the Rates businesses and excellent results in Continental Europe, Asia and Africa demonstrating the breadth of the client franchise. Net income was slightly ahead at £6,273m (2006: £6,225m) and costs were tightly managed, declining slightly year on year. Absa Capital delivered very strong growth in profit before tax to £155m (2006: £71m).

The US sub-prime driven market dislocation affected performance in the second half of 2007. Exposures relating to US sub-prime were actively managed and declined over the period. Barclays Capital’s 2007 results reflected netgross losses relatedof £2,999m (2006: £nil) due to the dislocation of credit market turbulencemarkets. These losses were partially offset by income and hedges of £1,635m, of which £795m was included in income, net£706m (2006: £nil) and gains of £658m gains arising(2006: £nil) from the fair valuationgeneral widening of credit spreads on structured notes issued by Barclays Capital. Impairment charges included £840mThe gross losses comprised £2,217m (2006: £nil) against ABS CDO Super Senior exposures, other credit market exposuresincome and drawn leveraged finance underwriting positions.£782m (2006: £nil) in impairment charges.

Income increased 14% (£852m) to £7,119m (2006: £6,267m) as a result of very strong growth in interest rate, currency, equity, commodity and emerging market asset classes. There was excellent income growth in continental Europe, Asia, and Africa. Average DVaR increased 13% to £42m (2006: £37.1m) in line with income.

Secondary income, comprising principal transactions (net trading income and net investment income), is mainly generated from providing client financing and risk management solutions. Secondary income increased 11% (£578m) to £5,871m (2006: £5,293m).

Net trading income increased 5% (£177m) to £3,739m (2006: £3,562m) with strong contributions from fixed income, commodities, equities, foreign exchange and prime services businesses. These were largely offset by net losses in the business affected by sub-prime

mortgage related write downs.write-downs. The general widening of credit spreads that occurred over the course of the second half of 2007 also reduced the carrying value of the £57bn£40.7bn of structured notes issued notesby Barclays Capital held at fair value on the balance sheet, resulting in gains of £658m.£658m (2006: £nil). Net investment income increased 66% (£380m) to £953m (2006: £573m) as a result of a number of private equity realisations, investment disposals in Asia and structured capital markets transactions. Net interest income increased 2% (£21m) to £1,179m (2006: £1,158m), driven by higher contributions from money markets. The corporate lending portfolio increased 29% to £52.3bn (2006: £40.6bn), largely due to an increase in drawn leveraged finance positions and a rise in drawn corporate loan balances.

Primary income, which comprises net fee and commission income from advisory and origination activities, grew 30% (£283m) to £1,235m (2006: £952m), with good contributions from bonds and loans.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions of £846m included £722m against ABS CDO Super Senior exposures, £60m from other credit market exposures and £58m relating to drawn leveraged finance underwriting positions. Other impairment charges on loans and advances amounted to a release of £7m (2006: £44m release) before impairment charges on available for sale assets of £13m (2006: £86m).


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

25


LOGO

   

2007

£m

       

2006

£m

       

2005

£m

 

 

Income statement information

         

Net interest income

  1,179      1,158      1,065 

Net fee and commission income

  1,235      952      776 

Net trading income

  3,739      3,562      2,231 

Net investment income

  953      573      413 

Principal transactions

  4,692      4,135      2,644 

Other income

  13       22       20 

 

Total income

  7,119      6,267      4,505 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

  (846)      (42)      (111)

 

Net income

  6,273      6,225      4,394 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (3,919)     (3,996)     (2,961)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (54)     (13)     (2)

Operating expenses

  (3,973)     (4,009)     (2,963)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  35               

 

Profit before tax

  2,335       2,216       1,431 

 

Balance sheet information

         

Total assets

 £839.7bn      £657.9bn      £601.2bn 

Selected statistical measures

                    

Cost:income ratioa

  56%       64%       66% 

Risk Tendencya

 £140m     £95m     £110m 

Risk weighted assets

 £169.1bn     £137.6bn     £116.7bn 

Average DVaR

 £42.0m     £37.1m     £32.0m 

Corporate lending portfolio

 £52.3bn      £40.6bn      £40.1bn 

aDefined on page 2.

Operating expenses decreased 1% (£36m) to £3,973m (2006: £4,009m). Performance related pay, discretionary investment spend and short term contractor resources represented 42% (2006: 50%) of the cost base. Amortisation of intangible assets of £54m (2006: £13m) principally related to mortgage service rights.

Total headcount increased 3,000 during 2007 to 16,200 (2006: 13,200) including 800 from the acquisition of EquiFirst. The majority of organic growth was in Asia Pacific.


 

Barclays Capital

 

        
    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   1,724     1,179     1,158 

Net fee and commission income

   1,429     1,235     952 

Net trading income

   1,506     3,739     3,562 

Net investment income

   559     953     573 

Principal transactions

   2,065     4,692     4,135 

Other income

   13      13      22 

Total income

   5,231     7,119     6,267 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

   (2,423)     (846)     (42)

Net income

   2,808     6,273     6,225 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (3,682)    (3,919)    (3,996)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (92)    (54)    (13)

Operating expenses

   (3,774)    (3,973)    (4,009)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

   6     35      

Gain on acquisition

   2,262             

Profit before tax

   1,302      2,335      2,216 

Balance sheet information

        

Total assets

  £1,629.1bn     £839.9bn     £657.9bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost:income ratio

   72%      56%      64% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £415m    £140m    £95m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £227.4bn    £178.2bn    £137.6bn 

Average DVaR (95%)b

  £53.4m     £32.5m     £37.1m 

2006/05Notes

Profit before tax increased 55% (£785m) to £2,216m (2005: £1,431m). This was the result of a very strong income performance, driven by higher business volumes, continued growth in client activity and favourable market conditions. Net income increased 42% (£1,831m) to £6,225m (2005: £4,394m). Profit before tax for Absa Capital was £71m (2005: £39m).

aRisk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

Income increased 39% (£1,762m) to £6,267m (2005: £4,505m) as a result of very strong growth across the Rates, Credit and Private Equity businesses. Income increased in all geographic regions. Average DVaR increased 16% to £37.1m (2005: £32.0m) significantly below the rate of income growth.

Secondary income increased 43% (£1,584m) to £5,293m (2005: £3,709m).

Net trading income increased 60% (£1,331m) to £3,562m (2005: £2,231m) with very strong contributions across the Rates and Credit businesses, in particular, commodities, fixed income, equities, credit derivatives and emerging markets.

The performance was driven by higher volumes of client led activity and favourable market conditions. Net investment income increased 39% (£160m) to £573m (2005: £413m) driven by investment realisations, primarily in Private Equity, offset by reduced contributions from credit products. Net interest income increased 9% (£93m) to £1,158m (2005: £1,065m) driven by a full year contribution from Absa Capital.

Primary income grew 23% (£176m) to £952m (2005: £776m). This reflected higher volumes and continued market share gains in a number of key markets, with strong contributions from issuances in bonds, European leveraged loans and convertibles.

Impairment charges of £42m (2005: £111m), including impairment on available for sale assets of £86m (2005: £nil), were 62% lower than prior year reflecting recoveries and the continued benign wholesale credit environment.

Operating expenses increased 35% (£1,046m) to £4,009m (2005: £2,963m), reflecting higher performance related costs, increased levels of activity and continued investment across the business. Performance related pay, discretionary investment spend and short-term contractor resource costs represented 50% of operating expenses (2005: 46%). Amortisation of intangible assets principally relates to mortgage service rights obtained as part of the purchase of HomEq.

Total headcount increased 3,300 during 2006 to 13,200 (2005: 9,900) and included 1,300 from the acquisition of HomEq. Organic growth was broadly based across all regions and reflected further investments in the front office, systems development and control functions to support continued business expansion.


bAverage DVaR for 2007 and 2006 are calculated with a 98% confidence level.

 

2646 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

Investment Banking and

Investment Management

Barclays Global Investors

Who we are

Barclays Global Investors (BGI) is one of the world’s largest asset managers and a leading global provider of investment management products and services. We are the global leader in assets and products in the exchange traded funds business, with over 320360 funds for institutions and individuals trading globally. BGI’s investment philosophy is founded on managing all dimensions of performance: a consistent focus on controlling risk, return and cost.

With a 3,000-plus strong workforce, we currently have over £1trn in assets under management, for 3,000 clients around the world.

What we do

BGI offers structured investment strategies such as indexing, global asset allocation and risk controlled active products including hedge funds and provides related investment services such as securities lending, cash management and portfolio transition services.

BGI collaborates with the other Barclays businesses, particularly Barclays Capital and Barclays Wealth, to develop and market products and leverage capabilities to better serve the client base.

HighlightsPerformance

2008/07

Barclays Global Investors profit before tax decreased 19% (£139m) to £595m (2007: £734m). Profit was impacted by the cost of provision of selective support of liquidity products of £263m (2007: £80m) and an 8% appreciation in the average value of the US Dollar against Sterling.

Income declined 4% (£82m) to £1,844m (2007: £1,926m).

Net fee and commission income declined 1% (£19m) to £1,917m (2007: £1,936m). This was primarily attributable to reduced incentive fees of £49m (2007: £198m), partially offset by increased securities lending revenue.

Operating expenses increased 5% (£57m) to £1,249m (2007: £1,192m). Operating expenses included charges of £263m (2007: £80m) related to selective support of liquidity products, partially offset by a reduction in performance related costs. The cost:income ratio increased to 68% (2007: 62%).


 

LOGO

Highlights

LOGO

LOGO

Performance indicators

Performance indicators

LOGO

 

Performance

Key facts

    2008      2007      2006
Assets under management          
(£):  1,040bn    1,044bn    927bn   
– indexed  653bn    615bn    566bn
– iShares  226bn    205bn    147bn
– active  161bn    224bn    214bn
Net new assets in period (£)  61bn    42bn    37bn   
Assets under management          
(US$):  1,495bn    2,079bn    1,814bn   
– indexed  939bn    1,225bn    1,108bn
– iShares  325bn    408bn    287bn
– active  231bn    446bn    419bn
Net new assets in period (US$)  99bn    86bn    68bn   
Number of iShares products  360    324    191   
Number of institutional clients  3,000     3,000     2,900   

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

47


LOGO

Total assets under management remained flat at £1,040bn (2007: £1,044bn) comprising £61bn of net new assets, £234bn of favourable exchange movements and £299bn of adverse market movements. In US Dollar terms assets under management decreased 28% (US$584bn) to US$1,495bn (2007: US$2,079bn), comprising US$99bn of net new assets, US$130bn of negative exchange rate movements and US$553bn of negative market movements.

2007/06

Barclays Global Investors delivered solid growth in profit before tax, which increased 3% (£20m) to £734m (2006: £714m). Very strong US Dollar income and strong profit growth was partially offset by the 8% depreciation in the average value of the US Dollar against Sterling.

Income grew 16% (£261m) to £1,926m (2006: £1,665m).

Net fee and commission income grew 17% (£285m) to £1,936m (2006: £1,651m). This was primarily attributable to increased management fees and securities lending. Incentive fees increased 6% (£12m) to £198m (2006: £186m). Higher asset values, driven by higher market levels and good net new inflows, contributed to the growth in income.

Operating expenses increased 25% (£241m) to £1,192m (2006: £951m) as a result of significant investment in key product and channel growth initiatives and in infrastructure as well as growth in the underlying business. Operating expenses included charges of £80m (2006: £nil) related to selective support of liquidity products managed in the US. The cost:income ratio rose five percentage points to 62% (2006: 57%).

Headcount increased 700 to 3,400 (2006: 2,700). Headcount increased in all geographical regions and across product groups and the support functions, reflecting continued investment to support further growth.

Total assets under management increased 13% (£117bn) to £1,044bn (2006: £927bn) comprising £42bn of net new assets, £12bn attributable to the acquisition of Indexchange Investment AG (Indexchange), £66bn of favourable market movements and £3bn of adverse exchange movements. In US$US Dollar terms assets under management increased 15% US$265bn(US$265bn) to US$2,079bn (2006: US$1,814bn), comprising US$86bn of net new assets, US$23bn attributable to acquisition of Indexchange, US$127bn of favourable market movements and US$29bn of positive exchange rate movements.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

27


LOGOBarclays Global Investors

 

  2007
£m
   2006
£m
   2005
£m
   

2008

£m

   

2007

£m

   

2006

£m

 

Income statement information

                

Net interest (expense)/income

   (8)    10     15    (38)    (8)    10 

Net fee and commission income

   1,936     1,651     1,297    1,917     1,936     1,651 

Net trading income

   5     2     2    (14)    5     2 

Net investment (expense)/income

   (9)    2     4    (29)    (9)    2 

Principal transactions

   (4)    4     6    (43)    (4)    4 

Other income

   2              8     2      

Total income

   1,926     1,665     1,318    1,844     1,926     1,665 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (1,184)    (946)    (775)   (1,234)    (1,184)    (946)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (8)    (5)    (4)   (15)    (8)    (5)

Operating expenses

   (1,192)    (951)    (779)   (1,249)    (1,192)    (951)

Profit before tax

   734     714     540    595     734     714 

Balance sheet information

                

Total assets

  £89.2bn    £80.5bn    £80.9bn   £71.3bn    £89.2bn    £80.5bn 

Selected statistical measures

         

Cost:income ratioa

   62%     57%     59% 

Risk weighted assets

  £2.0bn    £1.4bn    £1.5bn 
Performance ratios        
Cost:income ratio   68%     62%     57% 
Other financial measures        
Risk weighted assetsa  £3.9bn    £4.4bn    £1.4bn 

Note

 

aDefined on page 2.Risk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

2006/05

Barclays Global Investors delivered another year of outstanding results. Profit before tax increased 32% (£174m) to £714m (2005: £540m), reflecting very strong income growth and higher operating margins. The performance was broadly based across products, distribution channels and geographies.

Net fee and commission income increased 27% (£354m) to £1,651m (2005: £1,297m). This growth was attributable to increased management fees, particularly in the iShares and active businesses, and securities lending, offset by lower incentive fees. Incentive fees decreased 9% (£18m) to £186m (2005: £204m). Higher asset values, driven by higher market levels and good net new inflows, contributed to the growth in income.

Operating expenses increased 22% (£172m) to £951m (2005: £779m) as a result of significant investment in key growth initiatives, ongoing investment in product development and infrastructure and higher performance-based expenses. The cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 57% (2005: 59%).

Total headcount rose 400 to 2,700 (2005: 2,300). Headcount increased in all regions, across product groups and the support functions, reflecting continued investment to support strategic initiatives.

Total assets under management increased 5% (£46bn) to £927bn (2005: £881bn) primarily due to net new inflows of £37bn. The positive market move impact of £98bn was largely offset by £89bn of adverse exchange rate movements. In US$ terms assets under management increased by US$301bn to US$1,814bn (2005: US$1,513bn), comprising US$68bn of net new assets, US$177bn of favourable market movements and US$56bn of positive exchange rate movements.


 

2848 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

 

Investment Banking and Investment Management

Barclays Wealth

Who we are

Barclays Wealth focuses on high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients worldwide. We are the UK’s leading wealth manager by client assets. We have over 6,9007,900 staff in over 20 countries and have total client assets of £133bn. Barclays Wealth includes£145bn. We have offices across the closed life assurance activitiesAmericas following the acquisition of Barclays and Woolwich, and Walbrook, an independent fiduciary services company acquiredLehman Brothers Private Investment Management in 2007.2008.

What we do

Barclays Wealth provides international and private banking, asset andfiduciary services, investment management, stockbroking, offshore banking, wealth structuring and financial planning services.brokerage.

We work closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities, for example, offering world-class investment solutions with institutional quality products and services from Barclays Capital and Barclays Global Investors.

HighlightsPerformance

2008/07

Barclays Wealth profit before tax grew 119% (£364m) to £671m (2007: £307m). Profit before gains on disposal increased 12% (£38m) driven by solid income growth and tight cost control, offset by an increase in impairment charges. The closed life assurance business contributed profit before tax of £104m (2007: £110m) prior to its sale in October 2008, which generated a profit on disposal of £326m.

Income increased 3% (£37m) to £1,324m (2007: £1,287m).

Net interest income increased 13% (£55m) to £486m (2007: £431m) reflecting strong growth in both customer deposits and lending. Average deposits grew 19% to £37.2bn (2007: £31.2bn). Average lending grew 31% to £9.7bn (2007: £7.4bn).

Net fee and commission income decreased 3% (£19m) to £720m (2007: £739m) driven by falling equity markets partially offset by increased client assets.

Net investment income, net premiums from insurance contracts and net claims and benefits paid on insurance contracts related wholly to the closed life assurance business. Their overall net impact on income increased marginally to £103m (2007: £95m). The decrease in net investment income, driven by a fall in the value of unit linked contracts and reduced premium income, were offset by reduced net claims and benefits as a result of a fall in the value of linked and non-linked liabilities.

Impairment charges increased £37m to £44m (2007: £7m) from a very low base. This increase reflected both the substantial increase in the loan book over the last three years and the impact of the current economic environment on client liquidity and collateral values.

Operating expenses decreased 4% to £935m (2007: £973m) with significant cost savings including a reduction in performance related costs partially offset by increased expenditure in upgrading technology and operating platforms and continued hiring of client-facing staff.


 

LOGOHighlights
LOGO

Performance indicators

Performance indicators

LOGOLOGO

 

Performance

Key facts

    2008  2007  2006

Total client assets

  £145.1bn  £132.5bn  £116.1bn

BarclaysAnnual Report 200849


LOGO

Total client assets, comprising customer deposits and client investments, increased 10% (£12.6bn) to £145.1bn (2007: £132.5bn) with underlying net new asset inflows of £3.2bn and the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses offsetting the impact of market and foreign exchange movements and the sale of the closed life assurance book.

2007/06

Barclays Wealth profit before tax showed very strong growth of 25% (£62m) to £307m (2006: £245m). Performance was driven by broadly based income growth, reduced redress costs and tight cost control, partially offset by additional volume relatedvolume-related costs and increased investment in people and infrastructure to support future growth.

Income increased 11% (£127m) to £1,287m (2006: £1,160m).

Net interest income increased 10% (£39m) to £431m (2006: £392m), reflecting strong growth in both customer deposits and lending. Average deposits grew 13% to £31.2bn (2006: £27.7bn). Average lending grew 35% to £7.4bn (2006: £5.5bn), driven by increased lending to high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients.

Net fee and commission income grew 10% (£65m) to £739m (2006: £674m). This reflected growth in client assets and higher transactional income from increased sales of investment products and solutions.

Principal transactions decreased £101m to £55m (2006: £156m) as a result of lower growth in the value of unit linked insurance contracts. Net premiums from insurance contracts reduced £15m to £195m (2006: £210m). These reductions were offset by a lower charge for net claims and benefits incurred under insurance contracts of £152m (2006: £288m).

Operating expenses increased 7% to £973m (2006: £913m) with greater volume relatedvolume-related costs and a significant increase in investment partially offset by efficiency gains and lower customer redress costs of £19m (2006: £67m). Ongoing investment programmes included increased hiring of client facingclient-facing staff and improvements to infrastructure with the upgrade of technology and operations platforms. The cost:income ratio improved three percentage points to 76% (2006: 79%).

Total client assets, comprising customer deposits and client investments, increased 14% (£16.4bn) to £132.5bn (2006: £116.1bn), reflecting strong net new asset inflows and the acquisition of Walbrook, an independent fiduciary services company, which completed on 18th May 2007.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

29


LOGO

 

    2007
£m
      2006
£m
      2005
£m
 

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   431     392     346 

Net fee and commission income

   739     674     593 

Net trading income

   3     2      

Net investment income

   52     154     264 

Principal transactions

   55     156     264 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   195     210     195 

Other income

   19      16      11 

 

Total income

   1,439     1,448     1,409 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

   (152)     (288)     (375)

 

Total income net of insurance claims

   1,287     1,160     1,034 

Impairment charges

   (7)     (2)     (2)

 

Net income

   1,280     1,158     1,032 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (967)    (909)    (866)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (6)    (4)    (2)

Operating expenses

 

   (973)     (913)     (868)

 

Profit before tax

   307      245      164 

 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £9.0bn    £6.2bn    £5.0bn 

Customer accounts

  £34.4bn    £28.3bn    £25.8bn 

Total assets

  £18.0bn     £15.0bn     £13.4bn 

 

Selected statistical measures

                   

Cost:income ratioa

   76%      79%      84% 

Risk Tendencya

  £10m    £10m    £5m 

Risk weighted assets

  £7.7bn     £6.1bn     £4.3bn 

Barclays Wealth

    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   486     431     392 

Net fee and commission income

   720     739     674 

Net trading income

   (11)    3     2 

Net investment income

   (333)    52     154 

Principal transactions

   (344)    55     156 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   136     195     210 

Other income

   26      19      16 

Total income

   1,024     1,439     1,448 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

   300      (152)     (288)

Total income net of insurance claims

   1,324     1,287     1,160 

Impairment charges

   (44)     (7)     (2)

Net income

   1,280     1,280     1,158 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (919)    (967)    (909)

Amortisation of intangible assets

   (16)    (6)    (4)

Operating expenses

   (935)    (973)    (913)

Profit on disposal of associates and joint ventures

   326             

Profit before tax

   671      307      245 

Balance sheet information

        

Loans and advances to customers

  £11.4bn    £9.0bn    £6.2bn 

Customer accounts

  £42.4bn    £34.4bn    £28.3bn 

Total assets

  £13.3bn     £18.2bn     £15.0bn 

Performance ratios

        

Cost:income ratio

   71%      76%      79% 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £20m    £10m    £10m 

Risk weighted assets a

  £10.3bn     £8.2bn     £6.1bn 

Note

 

aDefined on page 2.Risk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007 are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

2006/05

Barclays Wealth profit before tax showed very strong growth of 49% (£81m) to £245m (2005: £164m). Performance was driven by broadly based income growth and favourable market conditions. This was partially offset by additional volume related costs and a significant increase in investment in people and infrastructure to support future growth.

Income increased 12% (£126m) to £1,160m (2005: £1,034m).

Net interest income increased 13% (£46m) to £392m (2005: £346m) reflecting growth in both customer deposits and customer lending. Average deposits grew 6% (£1.6bn) to £27.7bn (2005: £26.1bn). Average lending grew 17% to £5.5bn (2005: £4.7bn), driven by increased lending to offshore and private banking clients. Asset and liability margins were higher relative to 2005.

Net fee and commission income increased 14% (£81m) to £674m (2005: £593m). This reflected growth in client assets and higher transactional income, including increased sales of investment products to high net worth and affluent clients, and higher stockbroking volumes.

Operating expenses increased 5% (£45m) to £913m (2005: £868m) with greater volume related and investment costs more than offsetting efficiency gains. Investment costs included increased hiring of client-facing staff and improvements to infrastructure with the upgrade of technology and operations platforms. The cost:income ratio improved five percentage points to 79% (2005: 84%).

Total client assets, comprising customer deposits and client investments, increased 19% (£18.6bn) to £116.1bn (2005: £97.5bn) reflecting good net new asset inflows and favourable market conditions. Multi-Manager assets increased 68% (£4.1bn) to £10.1bn (2005: £6.0bn); this growth included transfers of existing client assets.


 

3050 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Financial review

Analysis of results by business

Head office functions and other operations

Who we are

Head office functions and other operations comprises:

 

· 

Head office and central support functions

 

· 

Businesses in transition

 

· 

Inter segment adjustments.Inter-segment adjustments

What we do

Head office and central support functions comprises the following areas: Executive Management, Finance, Treasury, Corporate Affairs, Human Resources, Strategy and Planning, Internal Audit, Legal, Corporate Secretariat, Property, Tax, Compliance and Risk. Costs incurred wholly on behalf of the businesses are recharged to them.

Businesses in transition principally relate to certain lending portfolios that are centrally managed with the objective of maximising recovery from the assets.

Performance

2008/07

Head office functions and other operations loss before tax increased £430m to £858m (2007: £428m).

Total income decreased £185m to a loss of £377m (2007: loss of £192m).

Group segmental reporting is performed in accordance with Group accounting policies. This means that inter-segment transactions are recorded in each segment as if undertaken on an arm’s length basis. Adjustments necessary to eliminate inter-segment transactions are included in Head office functions and other operations. The impact of such inter-segment adjustments increased £32m to £265m (2007: £233m). These adjustments included internal fees for structured capital market activities of £141m (2007: £169m) and fees paid to Barclays Capital for debt and equity raising and risk management advice of £151m (2007: £65m), both of which reduce net fees and commission income.

Net interest income increased £54m to £182m (2007: £128m) primarily due to a consolidation adjustment between net interest income and trading income required to match the booking of certain derivative hedging transactions between different segments in the Group. This resulted in a £111m increase in net interest income to £143m (2007: £32m) with an equal and opposite decrease in principal transactions.

 

PerformanceThis was partially offset by an increase in costs in central funding activity due to the money market dislocation, in particular LIBOR resets.

Principal transactions loss increased £135m to £218m (2007: £83m) reflecting the £111m increase in consolidation reclassification adjustment on derivative hedging transactions.

Impairment charges increased £27m to £30m (2007: £3m) mainly reflecting losses on Floating Rate Notes held for hedging purposes.

Operating expenses increased £217m to £451m (2007: £234m). The main drivers of this increase were: a £101m charge for the Group’s share of levies that will be raised by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; £64m costs relating to an internal review of Barclays compliance with US economic sanctions; the non-recurrence of a £58m break fee relating to the ABN Amro transaction; lower rental income and lower proceeds on property sales.

2007/06

Head office functions and other operations loss before tax increased £169m to £428m (2006: £259m).

Group segmental reporting is performed in accordance with Group accounting policies. This means that inter-segment transactions are recorded in each segment as if undertaken on an arm’s length basis. Adjustments necessary to eliminate inter-segment transactions are included in Head office functions and other operations.

The impact of such inter-segment adjustments increased £86m to £233m (2006: £147m). These adjustments included internal fees for structured capital market activities of £169m (2006: £87m) and fees paid to Barclays Capital for debt and equity raising and risk management advice of £65m (2006: £23m), both of which increased net fee and commission expense in headHead office. The impact on the inter-segment adjustments of the timing of the recognition of insurance commissions included in Barclaycard was a reduction in headHead office income of £9m (2006: £44m). This net reduction was reflected in a decrease in net fee and commission income of £162m (2006: £184m) and an increase in net premium income of £153m (2006: £140m).

Principal transactions decreased to a loss of £83m (2006: £42m profit). 2006 included a £55m profit from a hedge of the expected Absa foreign currency earnings. 2007 included a loss of £33m relating to fair valuation of call options embedded within retail US$ preference shares arising from widening of own credit spreads.

Operating expenses decreased £35m to £234m (2006: £269m). The primary driver of this decrease was the receipt of a break fee relating to the ABN AMRO transaction which, net of transaction costs, reduced expenses by £58m. This was partially offset by lower rental income and lower proceeds on property sales.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

31


LOGO

   2007
£m
     2006
£m
     2005
£m
    

Income statement information

      

Net interest income

  128    80    160  

Net fee and commission income

  (424)   (301)   (324) 

Net trading (loss)/income

  (66)   40    85  

Net investment (expense)/income

  (17)   2    8  

Principal transactions

  (83)   42    93  

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  152    139    72  

Other income

  35     39     24   

 

Total income

  (192)   (1)   25  

Impairment (charges)/releases

  (3)    11     (1)  

 

Net income

  (195)   10    24  

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

  (233)   (259)   (343) 

Amortisation of intangible assets

  (1)   (10)   (4) 

Operating expenses

  (234)   (269)   (347) 

Profit on disposal of associates and joint ventures

  1             

 

Loss before tax

  (428)    (259)    (323)  

 

Balance sheet information

      

Total assets

 £7.1bn    £7.1bn    £9.3bn   

 

Selected statistical measures

      

Risk Tendencya

 £10m   £10m   £25m  

Risk weighted assets

 £1.6bn    £1.9bn    £4.0bn   

aDefined on page 2.

2006/05

Head office functions and other operations loss before tax decreased £64m to £259m (2005: loss £323m).

Net interest income decreased £80m to £80m (2005: £160m) reflecting a reduction in net interest income in Treasury following the acquisition of Absa Group Limited. Treasury’s net interest income also included the hedge ineffectiveness for the period, which together with other related Treasury adjustments amounted to a gain of £11m (2005: £18m) and the cost of hedging the foreign exchange risk on the Group’s equity investment in Absa, which amounted to £71m (2005: £37m).

The impact of such inter-segment adjustments reduced £72m to £147m (2005: £219m). These adjustments related to internal fees for structured capital market activities of £87m (2005: £67m) and fees paid to Barclays Capital for capital raising and risk management advice of £23m (2005: £39m), both of which reduce net fees and commission income.

In addition the impact of the timing of the recognition of insurance commissions included in Barclaycard and UK Retail Banking reduced to £44m (2005: £113m). This reduction was reflected in a decrease in net fee and commission income of £184m (2005: £185m) and an increase in net premium income of £140m (2005: £72m).

Principal transactions decreased £51m to £42m (2005: £93m). 2005 included hedging related gains in Treasury of £80m. 2006 included £55m (2005: £nil) in respect of the economic hedge of the translation exposure arising from Absa foreign currency earnings.

The impairment charge improved £12m to a release of £11m (2005: £1m charge) as a number of workout situations were resolved.

Operating expenses decreased £78m to £269m (2005: £347m) primarily due to the expenses of the 2005 Head office relocation to Canary Wharf not recurring in 2006 (2005: £105m) and the gains of £26m (2005: £nil) from the sale and leaseback of property offset by increased costs, principally driven by major project expenditure including work related to implementing Basel II.


32 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 51


Financial reviewLOGO

Results by nature of incomeHead office functions and expenseother operations

 

    2008
£m
      2007
£m
      2006
£m
 

Income statement information

        

Net interest income

   182     128     80 

Net fee and commission income

   (486)    (424)    (301)

Net trading (loss)/income

   (245)    (66)    40 

Net investment income/(expense)

   27     (17)    2 

Principal transactions

   (218)    (83)    42 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

   119     152     139 

Other income

   26      35      39 

Total income

   (377)    (192)    (1)

Impairment (charges)/releases

   (30)     (3)     11 

Net income

   (407)    (195)    10 

Operating expenses excluding amortisation of intangible assets

   (451)    (233)    (259)

Amortisation of intangible assets

        (1)    (10)

Operating expenses

   (451)    (234)    (269)

Profit on disposal of associates and joint ventures

         1       

Loss before tax

   (858)     (428)     (259)

Balance sheet information

        

Total assets

  £3.1bn     £5.7bn     £7.1bn 

Other financial measures

        

Risk Tendency

  £5m    £10m    £10m 

Risk weighted assetsa

  £0.4bn     £1.1bn     £1.9bn 

Results by nature of income and expenseNote

Net interest income

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

 

Cash and balances with central banks

  145  91  9 

Available for sale investments

  2,580  2,811  2,272 

Loans and advances to banks

  1,416  903  690 

Loans and advances to customers

  19,559  16,290  12,944 

Other

  1,608  1,710  1,317 

Interest income

  25,308  21,805  17,232 

Deposits from banks

  (2,720) (2,819) (2,056)

Customer accounts

  (4,110) (3,076) (2,715)

Debt securities in issue

  (6,651) (5,282) (3,268)

Subordinated liabilities

  (878) (777) (605)

Other

  (1,339) (708) (513)

Interest expense

  (15,698) (12,662) (9,157)

Net interest income

  9,610  9,143  8,075 

2007/06

Group net interest income increased 5% (£467m) to £9,610m (2006: £9,143m) reflecting balance sheet growth across a number of businesses.

Group net interest income reflects structural hedges which function to reduce the impact of the volatility of short-term interest rate movements on equity and customer balances that do not re-price with market rates.

The contribution of structural hedges relative to average base rates decreased to £351m expense (2006: £26m income), largely due to the smoothing effect of the structural hedge on changes in interest rates.

Other interest expense principally includes interest on repurchase agreements and hedging activity.

2006/05

Group net interest income increased 13% (£1,068m) to £9,143m (2005: £8,075m). The inclusion of Absa contributed net interest income of £1,138m (2005a: £516m). Group net interest income excluding Absa grew 6%.

The contribution of the structural hedge decreased to £26m (2005: £145m), largely due to the impact of relatively higher short-term interest rates and lower medium-term rates.

LOGO

Notes

 

aFor 2005, this reflects the period from 27th July until 31st December 2005.

Barclays

Annual ReportRisk weighted assets for 2008 and 2007

33


Financial review

Results by nature of income and expense

Net fee and commission income

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Brokerage fees

  109  70  64 

Investment management fees

  1,787  1,535  1,250 

Securities lending

  241  185  151 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  6,363  6,031  4,805 

 

Foreign exchange commission

  178  184  160 

 

Fee and commission income

  8,678  8,005  6,430 

 

Fee and commission expense

  (970) (828) (725)

 

Net fee and commission income

  7,708  7,177  5,705 

2007/06

Net fee and commission income increased 7% (£531m) to £7,708m (2006: £7,177m).

Fee and commission income rose 8% (£673m) to £8,678m (2006: £8,005m) reflecting increased management and securities lending fees in Barclays Global Investors, increased client assets and higher transactional income in Barclays Wealth and higher income generated from lending fees in Barclays Commercial Bank. Fee income in Barclays Capital increased primarily due to the acquisition of HomEq.

2006/05

Net fee and commission income increased 26% (£1,472m) to £7,177m (2005: £5,705m). The inclusion of Absa contributed net fee and commission income of £850m (2005a: £334m). Group net fee and commission income excluding Absa grew 18%, reflecting growth across all businesses.

Fee and commission income rose 24% (£1,575m) to £8,005m (2005: £6,430m). The inclusion of Absa contributed fee and commission income of £896m (2005a: £386m). Excluding Absa, fee and commission income grew 18%, driven by a broadly based performance across the Group, particularly within Barclays Global Investors.

Fee and commission expense increased 14% (£103m) to £828m (2005: £725m), reflecting the growth in Barclaycard US. Absa contributed fee and commission expense of £46m (2005a: £52m).

Principal transactions

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

Rates related business

  4,162  2,848  1,732

Credit related business

  (403) 766  589

Net trading income

  3,759  3,614  2,321
          

Net gain from disposal of available for sale

assets

  560  307  120

Dividend income

  26  15  22
Net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value  293  447  389

 

Other investment income

  337  193  327

 

Net investment income

  1,216  962  858

 

Principal transactions

  4,975  4,576  3,179

2007/06

Principal transactions increased 9% (£399m) to £4,975m (2006: £4,576m).

Net trading income increased 4% (£145m) to £3,759m (2006: £3,614m). The majority of the Group’s net trading income arises in Barclays Capital. Growth in the Rates related business reflects very strong performances in fixed income, commodities, foreign exchange, equity and prime services. The Credit related business includes net losses from credit market turbulence and the benefits of widening credit spreads on the fair value of issued notes.

Net investment income increased 26% (£254m) to £1,216m (2006: £962m). The cumulative gain from disposal of available for sale assets increased 82% (£253m) to £560m (2006: £307m) largely as a result of a number of private equity realisations and divestments. Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value decreased by 34% (£154m) largely due to lower growth in the value of linked insurance assets within Barclays Wealth.

Fair value movements on insurance assets included within net investment income contributed £113m (2006: £205m).

2006/05

Net trading income increased 56% (£1,293m) to £3,614m (2005: £2,321m) due to excellent performances in Barclays Capital Rates and Credit businesses, in particular in commodities, fixed income, equities, credit derivatives and emerging markets. This was driven by higher volumes of client – led activity and favourable market conditions. The inclusion of Absa contributed net trading income of £60m (2005a: £9m). Group net trading income excluding Absa grew 54%.

Net investment income increased 12% (£104m) to £962m (2005: £858m). The inclusion of Absa contributed net investment income of £144m (2005 a: £62m). Group net investment income excluding Absa increased 3%.

The cumulative gain from disposal of available for sale assets increased 156% (£187m) to £307m (2005: £120m) driven by investment realisations, primarily in Private Equity.

Fair value movements on certain assets and liabilities have been reported within net trading income or within net investment income depending on the nature of the transaction. Fair value movements on insurance assets included within net investment income contributed £205m (2005: £317m).

Note

aFor 2005, this reflects the period from 27th July until 31st December 2005.

34

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Other income

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  5,592  7,417  9,234 

Increase in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (5,592) (7,417) (9,234)

Property rentals

  53  55  54 

Loss on part disposal of Monument credit card portfolio

  (27)    

Other

  162  159  93 

 

Other income

  188  214  147 

Certain asset management products offered to institutional clients by Barclays Global Investors are recognised as investment contracts. Accordingly the invested assets and the related liabilities to investors are held at fair value and changes in those fair values are reported within other income.

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

 

Impairment charges on loans and advances

    

– New and increased impairment allowances

  2,871  2,722  2,129 

– Releases

  (338) (389) (333)

– Recoveries

  (227) (259) (222)

 

Impairment charges on loans and advances

  2,306  2,074  1,574 

 

Other credit provisions

    
Charges/(credits) in respect of undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees  476  (6) (7)

 

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisionsImpairment charges on available for saleassets

  2,782  2,068  1,567 
  13  86  4 

 

Impairment charges and other creditprovisions

  2,795  2,154  1,571 

 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions on ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures included above:

          

Impairment charges on loans and advances

  313     

Charges in respect of undrawn facilities

  469     

 

Impairment charges and other creditprovisions on ABS CDO Super seniorand other credit market positions

  782     

2007/06

Total impairment charges and other credit provisions increased 30% (£641m) to £2,795m (2006: £2,154m).

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions increased 35% (£714m) to £2,782m (2006: £2,068m) reflecting charges of £782m against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market positions.

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions as a percentage of Group total loans and advances increased to 0.71% (2006: 0.65%); total loans and advances grew 23% to £389,290m (2006: £316,561m).

Retail

Retail impairment charges on loans and advances fell 11% (£204m) to £1,605m (2006: £1,809m). Retail impairment charges as a percentage of period end total loans and advances reduced to 0.98% (2006: 1.30%); total retail loans and advances increased 18% to £164,062m (2006: £139,350m).

Barclaycard impairment charges improved 21% (£229m) to £838m (2006: £1,067m) reflecting reduced flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and lower charge-offs in UK Cards. We made changes to our impairment methodologies to standardise our approach and in anticipation of Basel II. The net positive impact of these changes in methodology was offset by the increase in impairment charges in Barclaycard International and secured consumer lending.

Impairment charges in UK Retail Banking decreased by £76m (12%) to £559m (2006: £635m), reflecting lower charges in unsecured Consumer Lending and Local Business driven by improved collection processes, reduced flows into delinquency, lower arrears trends and stable charge-offs. In UK Home Finance, asset quality remained strong and mortgage charges remained negligible. Mortgage delinquencies as a percentage of outstandings remained stable and amounts charged off were low.

Impairment charges in International Retail and Commercial Banking –excluding Absa rose by £38m (93%) to £79m (2006: £41m) reflecting very strong balance sheet growth in 2006 and 2007 and the impact of lower releases in 2007.

Arrears in some of International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa’s retail portfolios deteriorated in 2007, driven by interest rate increases in 2006 and 2007 resulting in pressure on collections.

Wholesale and corporate

Wholesale and corporate impairment charges on loans and advances increased £436m to £701m (2006: £265m). Wholesale and corporate impairment charges as a percentage of period end total loans and advances increased to 0.31% (2006: 0.15%); total loans and advances grew 27% to £225,228m (2006: £177,211m).

Barclays Capital impairment charges and other credit provisions of £846m included a charge of £782m against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures and £58m net of fees relating to drawn leveraged finance positions.

The impairment charge in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £38m (15%) to £290m (2006: £252m), primarily due to higher impairment charges in Larger Business, partially offset by a lower charge in Medium Business due to a tightening of the lending criteria.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

35


Financial review

Results by nature of income and expense

Impairment charges (continued)

2006/05

Total impairment charges increased 37% (£583m) to £2,154m (2005: £1,571m).

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions increased 32% (£501m) to £2,068m (2005: £1,567m). Excluding Absa, the increase was 26% (£395m) and largely reflected the continued challenging credit environment in UK unsecured retail lending through 2006. The wholesale and corporate sectors remained stable with a low level of defaults.

The Group impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions as a percentage of year-end total loans and advances of £316,561m (2005: £303,451m) increased to 0.65% (2005: 0.52%).

Retail

Retail impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions increased to £1,809m (2005: £1,254m), including £99m (2005a: £10m) in respect of Absa. Retail impairment charges on loans and advances amounted to 1.30% (2005b: 0.93%) as a percentage of year-end total loans and advances of £139,350m (2005b: £134,420m), including balances in Absa of £20,090m (2005: £20,836m).

In the UK retail businesses, household cash flows remained under pressure leading to a deterioration in consumer credit quality. High debt levels and changing social attitudes to bankruptcy and debt default contributed to higher levels of insolvency and increased impairment charges. In UK cards and unsecured consumer lending, the flows of new delinquencies and the levels of arrears balances declined in the second half of 2006, reflecting more selective customer recruitment, limit management and improved collections.

In UK Home Finance, delinquencies were flat and amounts charged-off remained low. The weaker external environment led to increased credit delinquency in Local Business, where there were both higher balances on caution status and higher flows into delinquency, which both stabilised towards the year end.

Wholesale and corporate

In the wholesale and corporate businesses, impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions decreased to £259m (2005: £313m), including £27m (2005a: £10m) in respect of Absa. The fall was due mainly to recoveries in Barclays Capital as a result of the benign wholesale credit environment. This was partially offset by an increase in Barclays Commercial Bank, reflecting higher charges in Medium Business and growth in lending balances.

The wholesale and corporate impairment charge was 0.15% (2005b: 0.19%) as a percentage of year-end total loans and advances to banks and to customers of £177,211m (2005b: £169,031m), including balances in Absa of £9,299m (2005: £9,731m).

In Absa, impairment charges increased to £126m (2005b: £20m) reflecting a full year of business and normalisation of credit conditions in South Africa following a period of low interest rates.

Impairment on available for sale assets

The total impairment charges in Barclays Capital included losses of £83m (2005: £nil) on an available for sale portfolio where an intention to sell caused the losses to be viewed as other than temporary in nature. These losses in 2006 were primarily due to interest rate movements, rather than credit deterioration, with a corresponding gain arising on offsetting derivatives recognised in net trading income.

Operating expenses

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

Staff costs (refer to page 37)

  8,405  8,169  6,318

Administrative expenses

  3,978  3,980  3,443

Depreciation

  467  455  362
Impairment loss – property and equipment and intangible assets  16  21  9

Operating lease rentals

  414  345  316

Gain on property disposals

  (267) (432) 

Amortisation of intangible assets

  186  136  79

Operating expenses

  13,199  12,674  10,527

2007/06

Operating expenses grew 4% (£525m) to £13,199m (2006: £12,674m). The increase was driven by growth of 3% (£236m) in staff costs to £8,405m (2006: £8,169m) and lower gains on property disposals.

Administrative expenses remained flat at £3,978m (2006: £3,980m) reflecting good cost control across all businesses.

Operating lease rentals increased 20% (£69m) to £414m (2006: £345m), primarily due to increased property held under operating leases.

Operating expenses were reduced by gains from the sale of property of £267m (2006: £432m) as the Group continued the sale and leaseback of some of its freehold portfolio, principally in UK Banking.

Amortisation of intangible assets increased 37% (£50m) to £186m (2006: £136m) primarily reflecting the amortisation of mortgage servicing rights relating to the acquisition of HomEq in November 2006.

The Group cost:income ratio improved two percentage points to 57% (2006: 59%).

2006/05

Operating expenses increased 20% (£2,147m) to £12,674m (2005: £10,527m). The inclusion of Absa contributed operating expenses of £1,496m (2005a: £664m). Group operating expenses excluding Absa grew 13%, reflecting a higher level of business activity and an increase in performance related pay.

Administrative expenses increased 16% (£537m) to £3,980m (2005: £3,443m). The inclusion of Absa contributed administrative expenses of £579m (2005a: £257m). Group administrative expenses excluding Absa grew 7% principally as a result of higher business activity in UK Banking and Barclays Capital.

Operating lease rentals increased 9% (£29m) to £345m (2005: £316m). The inclusion of Absa contributed operating lease rentals of £73m (2005a: £27m), which more than offset the absence of double occupancy costs incurred in 2005, associated with the Head office relocation to Canary Wharf.

Operating expenses were reduced by gains from the sale of property of £432m (2005: £nil) as the Group took advantage of historically low yields on property to realise gains on some of its freehold portfolio.

Amortisation of intangible assets increased 72% (£57m) to £136m (2005: £79m) primarily reflecting the inclusion of Absa for the full year.

The Group cost:income ratio improved to 59% (2005: 61%). This reflected improved productivity.


Notes

aFor 2005, this reflects the period from 27th July until 31st December 2005.

bIn 2005 the analysis of loans and advances to customers between retail business and wholesale and corporate business has been reclassified to reflect enhanced methodology implementation. are calculated under Basel II. 2006 is calculated under Basel I.

 

36

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Staff costs

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

Salaries and accrued incentive payments

  6,993  6,635  5,036

Social security costs

  508  502  412

Pension costs

      

– defined contribution plans

  141  128  76

– defined benefit plans

  150  282  271

Other post-retirement benefits

  10  30  27

Other

  603  592  496

Staff costs

  8,405  8,169  6,318

2007/06

Staff costs increased 3% (£236m) to £8,405m (2006: £8,169m).

Salaries and accrued incentive payments rose 5% (£358m) to £6,993m (2006: £6,635m), reflecting increased permanent and fixed term staff worldwide.

Defined benefit plans pension costs decreased 47% (£132m) to £150m (2006: £282m). This was mainly due to lower service costs.

2006/05

Staff costs increased 29% (£1,851m) to £8,169m (2005: £6,318m). The inclusion of Absa contributed staff costs of £694m (2005a: £296m). Group staff costs excluding Absa rose 24%.

Salaries and accrued incentive payments rose 32% (£1,599m) to £6,635m (2005: £5,036m), principally due to increased performance related payments and the full year inclusion of Absa. The inclusion of Absa contributed salaries and incentive payments of £615m (2005a: £276m). Group salaries and accrued incentive payments excluding Absa rose 26%.

Staff numbers

    2007          2006          2005    

UK Banking

  41,200        42,600        41,100    

UK Retail Banking

  32,800        34,500        33,300    

Barclays

Commercial Bank

  8,400        8,100        7,800    

Barclaycard

  7,800        8,500        7,700    

IRCB

  58,300        47,800        45,200    

IRCB – ex Absa

  22,100        13,900        12,500    

IRCB – Absa

  36,200        33,900        32,700    

Barclays Capital

  16,200        13,200        9,900    

Barclays Global Investors

  3,400        2,700        2,300    

Barclays Wealth

  6,900        6,600        6,200    
Head office functions and other operations  1,100         1,200         900    
Total Group permanent staff worldwide  134,900         122,600         113,300    

2007/06

Staff numbers are shown on a full-time equivalent basis. Total Group permanent and fixed term contract staff comprised 61,900 (2006: 62,400) in the UK and 73,000 (2006: 60,200) internationally.

UK Retail Banking headcount decreased 1,700 to 32,800 (2006: 34,500), due to efficiency initiatives in back office operations and the transfer of operations personnel to Barclays Commercial Bank. Barclays Commercial Bank headcount increased 300 to 8,400 (2006: 8,100) due to the transfer of operations personnel from UK Retail Banking and additional investment in front line staff to drive improved geographical coverage.

Barclaycard staff numbers decreased 700 to 7,800 (2006: 8,500), due to efficiency initiatives implemented across the UK operation and the sale of part of the Monument card portfolio, partially offset by an increase in the International cards businesses.

International Retail and Commercial Banking staff numbers increased 10,500 to 58,300 (2006: 47,800). International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa staff numbers increased 8,200 to 22,100 (2006: 13,900) due to growth in the distribution network. International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa staff numbers increased 2,300 to 36,200 (2006: 33,900), reflecting growth in the business and distribution network.

Barclays Capital staff numbers increased 3,000 to 16,200 (2006: 13,200) including 800 from the acquisition of EquiFirst. This reflected further investment in the front office, systems development and control functions to support continued business expansion. The majority of organic growth was in Asia Pacific.

Barclays Global Investors staff numbers increased 700 to 3,400 (2006: 2,700). Headcount increased in all geographical regions and across product groups and the support functions, reflecting continued investment to support further growth.

Barclays Wealth staff numbers increased 300 to 6,900 (2006: 6,600) principally due to the acquisition of Walbrook and increased client facing professionals.


Note

aFor 2005, this reflects the period from 27th July until 31st December 2005.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

37


Financial review

Results by nature of income and expense

Staff numbers (continued)

2006/05

Total Group permanent and contract staff comprised 62,400 (2005: 59,100) in the UK and 60,200 (2005: 54,200) internationally.

UK Banking staff numbers increased 1,500 to 42,600 (2005: 41,100), primarily reflecting the inclusion in UK Retail Banking of mortgage processing staff involved in activities previously outsourced.

Barclaycard staff numbers rose 800 to 8,500 (2005: 7,700), reflecting growth of 400 in Barclaycard US and increases in operations and customer-facing staff in the UK.

International Retail and Commercial Banking increased staff numbers 2,600 to 47,800 (2005: 45,200). International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa increased staff numbers by 1,400 to 13,900 (2005: 12,500), mainly due to growth in continental Europe and Africa. International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa increased staff numbers by 1,200 to 33,900 (2005: 32,700), reflecting continued growth in the business.

Barclays Capital staff numbers increased 3,300 during 2006 to 13,200 (2005: 9,900) and included 1,300 from the acquisition of HomEq. Organic growth was broadly based across all regions and reflected further investments in the front office, systems development and control functions to support continued business expansion.

Barclays Global Investors increased staff numbers 400 to 2,700 (2005: 2,300) spread across regions, product groups and support functions, reflecting continued investment to support strategic initiatives.

Barclays Wealth staff numbers rose 400 to 6,600 (2005: 6,200) to support the continued expansion of the business, including increased hiring of client-facing staff.

Head office functions and other operations staff numbers grew 300 to 1,200 (2005: 900) primarily reflecting the centralisation of functional activity and the increased regulatory environment and audit demands as a result of the expansion of business areas.

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Profit from associates

  33  53  53 

Profit/(loss) from joint ventures

  9  (7) (8)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  42  46  45 

2007/06

The overall share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures decreased £4m to £42m (2006: £46m). The share of results from associates decreased £20m mainly due to the sale of FirstCaribbean International Bank (2006: £41m) at the end of 2006, partially offset by an increased contribution from private equity associates. The share of results from joint ventures increased by £16m mainly due to the contribution from private equity entities.

2006/05

The share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures increased 2% (£1m) to £46m (2005: £45m).

Of the £46m share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures, FirstCaribbean International Bank contributed £41m (2005: £37m).

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries,associates and joint ventures  28  323  

2007/06

The profit on disposal in 2007 relates mainly to the disposal of the Group’s shareholdings in Gabetti Property Solutions (£8m) and Intelenet Global Services (£13m).

2006/05

The profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures includes £247m profit on disposal of FirstCaribbean International Bank and £76m from the sale of interests in vehicle leasing and vendor finance businesses.


38

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Tax

The overall tax charge is explained in the following table:

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Profit before tax

  7,076  7,136  5,280 
Tax charge at average UK corporation tax rate of 30%  2,123  2,141  1,584 

Prior year adjustments

  (37) 24  (133)

Differing overseas tax rates

  (77) (17) (35)
Non-taxable gains and income (including amounts offset by unrecognised tax losses)  (136) (393) (129)

Share-based payments

  72  27  (12)
Deferred tax assets not
previously recognised
  (158) (4) (7)

Change in tax rates

  24  4  3 

Other non-allowable expenses

  170  159  168 

Overall tax charge

  1,981  1,941  1,439 

Effective tax rate

  28%  27%  27% 

2007/06

The tax charge for the period was based on a UK corporation tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%). The effective rate of tax for 2007, based on profit before tax, was 28.0% (2006: 27.2%). The effective tax rate differed from 30% as it took account of the different tax rates applied to profits earned outside the UK, non-taxable gains and income and adjustments to prior year tax provisions. The forthcoming change in the UK rate of corporation tax from 30% to 28% on 1st April 2008 led to an additional tax charge in 2007 as a result of its effect on the Group’s net deferred tax asset. The effective tax rate for 2007 was higher than the 2006 rate, principally because there was a higher level of profit on disposals of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures offset by losses or exemptions in 2006.

2006/05

The charge for the period is based upon a UK corporation tax rate of 30% for the calendar year 2006 (2005: 30%). The effective rate of tax for 2006, based on profit before tax, was 27.2% (2005: 27.3%). The effective tax rate differs from 30% as it takes account of the different tax rates which are applied to the profits earned outside the UK, disallowable expenditure, certain non-taxable gains and adjustments to prior year tax provisions. The effective tax rate for 2006 is consistent with the prior period. The tax charge for the year includes £1,234m (2005: £961m) arising in the UK and £707m (2005: £478m) arising overseas.

The profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures of £323m was substantially offset by losses or exemptions. The effective tax rate on profit before business disposals was 28.5%.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

39


Financial review

Total assets and risk weighted assets

Total assets

  2007

£m

    2006

£m

    2005

£m

   

UK Banking

 161,777   147,576   137,981  

UK Retail Banking

 87,833    81,692    78,066  

Barclays Commercial Bank

 73,944    65,884    59,915  

Barclaycard

 22,164   20,082   18,236  

IRCB

 89,457   68,588   63,383  

IRCB – ex Absa

 52,204   38,191   34,022  

IRCB – Absa

 37,253   30,397   29,361  

Barclays Capital

 839,662   657,922   601,193  

Barclays Global Investors

 89,224   80,515   80,900  

Barclays Wealth

 18,024   15,022   13,401  
Head office functions and other operations 7,053    7,082    9,263   
Total assets 1,227,361       996,787       924,357   

Risk weighted assetsa

         
  2007

£m

    2006

£m

    2005

£m

   

UK Banking

 99,836   92,981   87,971  

UK Retail Banking

 45,992   43,020   40,845  

Barclays Commercial Bank

 53,844   49,961   47,126  

Barclaycard

 19,929   17,035   13,625  

IRCB

 53,269   40,810   41,069  

IRCB – ex Absa

 29,667   20,082   20,235  

IRCB – Absa

 23,602   20,728   20,834  

Barclays Capital

 169,124   137,635   116,677  

Barclays Global Investors

 1,994   1,375   1,456  

Barclays Wealth

 7,692   6,077   4,305  

Head office functions and other operations

 1,632   1,920   4,045  
Risk weighted assets 353,476    297,833    269,148   

LOGO

Note

aRisk weighted assets are calculated under Basel I

2007/06

Total assets increased 23% to £1,227.4bn (2006: £996.8bn). Risk weighted assets increased 19% to £353.5bn (2006: £297.8bn). Loans and advances to customers that have been securitised increased £4.3bn to £28.7bn (2006: £24.4bn). The increase in risk weighted assets since 2006 reflected a rise of £31.6bn in the banking book and a rise of £24.0bn in the trading book.

UK Retail Banking total assets increased 7% to £87.8bn (2006: £81.7bn). This was mainly attributable to growth in mortgage balances. Risk weighted assets increased by 7% to £46.0bn (2006: £43.0bn) with growth in mortgages partially offset by an increase in securitised balances and other reductions.

Barclays Commercial Bank total assets grew 12% to £73.9bn (2006: £65.9bn) driven by good growth across lending products. Risk weighted assets increased 8% to £53.8bn (2006: £50.0bn), reflecting asset growth partially offset by increased regulatory netting and an increase in securitised balances.

Barclaycard total assets increased 10% to £22.2bn (2006: £20.1bn). Risk weighted assets increased 17% to £19.9bn (2006: £17.0bn), primarily reflecting the increase in total assets, redemption of securitisation transactions, partially offset by changes to the treatment of regulatory associates and the sale of part of the Monument card portfolio.

International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa total assets grew 37% to £52.2bn (2006: £38.2bn). This growth was mainly driven by increases in retail mortgages and unsecured lending in Western Europe and increases in unsecured lending in Emerging Markets. Risk weighted assets increased 48% to £29.7bn (2006: £20.1bn), reflecting asset growth and a change in product mix.

International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa total assets increased 23% to £37.3bn (2006: £30.4bn), primarily driven by increases in mortgages, credit cards and commercial property finance. Risk weighted assets increased 14% to £23.6bn (2006: £20.7bn), reflecting balance sheet growth.

Barclays Capital total assets rose 28% to £839.7bn (2006: £657.9bn). Derivative assets increased £109.3bn primarily due to movements across a range of market indices. This was accompanied by a corresponding increase in derivative liabilities. The increase in non-derivative assets reflects an expansion of the business across a number of asset classes, combined with an increase in drawn leveraged loan positions and mortgage-related assets. Risk weighted assets increased 23% to £169.1bn (2006: £137.6bn) reflecting growth in fixed income, equities and credit derivatives.

Barclays Global Investors total assets increased 11% to £89.2bn (2006: £80.5bn), mainly attributable to growth in certain asset management products recognised as investment contracts. The majority of total assets relates to asset management products with equal and offsetting balances reflected within liabilities to customers. Risk weighted assets increased 43% to £2.0bn (2006: £1.4bn) mainly attributable to overall growth in the balance sheet and the mix of securities lending activity.

Barclays Wealth total assets increased 20% to £18.0bn (2006: £15.0bn) reflecting strong growth in lending to high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients. Risk weighted assets increased 26% to £7.7bn (2006: £6.1bn) reflecting the increase in lending.

Head office functions and other operations total assets remained flat at £7.1bn (2006: £7.1bn). Risk weighted assets decreased 16% to £1.6bn (2006: £1.9bn).


40

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

2006/05

Total assets increased 8% to £996.8bn (2005: £924.4bn). Risk weighted assets increased 11% to £297.8bn (2005: £269.1bn). Loans and advances to customers that have been securitised increased £5.8bn to £24.4bn (2005: £18.6bn). The increase in risk weighted assets since 2005 reflects a rise of £18.1bn in the banking book and a rise of £10.9bn in the trading book.

UK Retail Banking total assets increased 5% to £81.7bn (2005: £78.1bn). This was mainly attributable to growth in mortgage balances. Risk weighted assets increased 5% to £43.0bn (2005: £40.8bn) also primarily reflecting the growth in mortgage balances.

Barclays Commercial Bank total assets increased 10% to £65.9bn (2005: £59.9bn) reflecting good growth across short, medium and long term lending products. Risk weighted assets increased 6% to £50.0bn (2005: £47.1bn), reflecting asset growth and increased regulatory netting.

Barclaycard total assets increased 10% to £20.1bn (2005: £18.2bn) driven by growth in lending balances in the international businesses and FirstPlus. Risk weighted assets increased 25% to £17.0bn (2005: £13.6bn), primarily reflecting the increase in total assets and lower securitised balances.

International Retail and Commercial Banking-excluding Absa total assets increased 12% to £38.2bn (2005: £34.0bn) mainly reflecting increases in mortgage and other lending. Risk weighted assets remained flat at £20.1bn (2005: £20.2bn), with balance sheet growth offset by the sale of FirstCaribbean International Bank.

International Retail and Commercial Banking-Absa total assets increased 3% to £30.4bn (2005: £29.4bn). Risk weighted assets remained flat at £20.7bn (2005: £20.8bn). This reflects very strong growth in Rand terms offset by a 21% decline in the value of the Rand. In Rand terms assets grew 31% to R417bn (2005: R319bn) and risk weighted assets grew 25% to R284bn (2005: R227bn) due to strong growth in mortgage lending along with growth in corporate lending.

Barclays Capital total assets increased 9% to £657.9bn (2005: £601.2bn). This reflected continued expansion of the business with growth in reverse repurchase agreements, debt securities and traded equity securities. Risk weighted assets increased 18% to £137.6bn (2005: £116.7bn) in line with risk, driven by the growth in equity derivatives, credit derivatives and fixed income.

Barclays Global Investors total assets remained flat at £80.5bn (2005: £80.9bn). The majority of total assets relates to asset management products with equal and offsetting balances reflected within liabilities to customers. Risk weighted assets decreased 7% to £1.4bn (2005: £1.5bn).

Barclays Wealth total assets increased 12% to £15.0bn (2005: £13.4bn) reflecting strong growth in lending to high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients. Risk weighted assets increased 42% to £6.1bn (2005: £4.3bn) above the rate of balance sheet growth driven by changes in the mix of lending and growth in guarantees.

Head office functions and other operations total assets decreased 24% to £7.1bn (2005: £9.3bn). Risk weighted assets decreased 53% to £1.9bn (2005: £4.0bn).


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

41


Financial review

Capital management

Total shareholders’ equity

    2007
£m
      2006
£m
      

2005

£m

 

Barclays PLC Group

        

Called up share capital

  1,651    1,634    1,623 

Share premium account

  56    5,818    5,650 

Available for sale reserve

  154    132    225 

Cash flow hedging reserve

  26    (230)   70 

Capital redemption reserve

  384    309    309 

Other capital reserve

  617    617    617 

Currency translation reserve

  (307)     (438)     156 

Other reserves

  874    390    1,377 

Retained earnings

  20,970    12,169    8,957 

Less: Treasury shares

  (260)    (212)    (181)
Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests  23,291    19,799    17,426 

Minority interests

  9,185     7,591     7,004 

Total shareholders’ equity

  32,476     27,390     24,430 

2007/06

Total shareholders’ equity increased £5,086m to £32,476m (2006: £27,390m).

Called up share capital comprises 6,600 million (2006: 6,535 million) ordinary shares of 25p each and 1 million (2006: 1 million) staff shares of £1 each. Called up share capital increased by £17m representing the nominal value of shares issued to Temasek Holdings, China Development Bank (CDB) and employees under share option plans largely offset by a reduction in nominal value arising from share buy-backs. Share premium reduced by £5,762m; the reclassification of £7,223m to retained earnings resulting from the High Court approved cancellation of share premium was partly offset by additional premium arising on the issuance to CDB and on employee options. The capital redemption reserve increased by £75m representing the nominal value of the share buy-backs.

Retained earnings increased by £8,801m. Increases primarily arose from profit attributable to equity holders of the parent of £4,417m, the reclassification of share premium of £7,223m and the proceeds of the Temasek issuance in excess of nominal value of £941m. Reductions primarily arose from external dividends paid of £2,079m and the total cost of share repurchases of £1,802m.

Movements in other reserves, except the capital redemption reserve, reflect the relevant amounts recorded in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense on page 162.

Minority interests increased £1,594m to £9,185m (2006: £7,591m). The increase was primarily driven by preference share issuances of £1,322m and an increase in the minority interest in Absa of £225m.

The Group’s authority to buy-back equity shares was renewed at the 2007 AGM.

2006/05

Total shareholders’ equity increased £2,960m to £27,390m (2005: £24,430m).

Called up share capital and share premium increased by £11m and £168m respectively representing the issue of shares to employees under share option plans.

Retained earnings increased by £3,212m primarily reflecting profit attributable to equity holders of the parent of £4,571m partly offset by dividends paid of £1,771m.

Movements in other reserves reflect the relevant amounts recorded in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense.

Minority interests increased £587m primarily reflecting the issuance of preference shares by Barclays Bank PLC and Absa.

Barclays Bank PLC

Preference shares issued by Barclays Bank PLC are included within share capital and share premium in the Barclays Bank PLC Group but represent minority interests in the Barclays PLC Group. Certain issuances of reserve capital instruments and capital notes by Barclays Bank PLC are included within other shareholders’ equity in the Barclays Bank PLC Group but represent minority interests in Barclays PLC Group.

    2007
£m
      2006
£m
      

2005

£m

 

Barclays Bank PLC Group

        

Called up share capital

  2,382    2,363    2,348 

Share premium account

  10,751    9,452    8,882 

Available for sale reserve

  111    184    257 

Cash flow hedging reserve

  26    (230)   70 

Currency translation reserve

  (307)     (438)     156 

Other reserves

  (170)   (484)   483 

Other shareholders’ equity

  2,687    2,534    2,490 

Retained earnings

  14,222     11,556     8,462 
Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests  29,872    25,421    22,665 

Minority interests

  1,949     1,685     1,578 

Total shareholders’ equity

  31,821     27,106     24,243 

42

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Capital ratios

   Basel II     Basel I      Basel I      Basel I
   2007     2007      2006      2005
   Barclays
PLC
Group
    Barclays
PLC
Group
  Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
     Barclays
PLC
Group
  Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
     Barclays
PLC
Group
  Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
 

Capital ratios

  %    %  %    %  %    %  %

Tier 1 ratio

  7.6    7.8  7.5    7.7  7.5    7.0  6.9

Risk asset ratio

  11.2    12.1  11.8     11.7  11.5     11.3  11.2
 

Risk weighted assets

  £m    £m  £m     £m  £m     £m  £m
 

Banking book

                    

    on-balance sheet

  n/a    231,496  231,491    197,979  197,979    180,808  180,808

    off-balance sheet

  n/a    32,620  32,620    33,821  33,821    31,351  31,351

Associates and joint ventures

  n/a    1,354  1,354     2,072  2,072     3,914  3,914
 

Total banking book

  244,474    265,470  265,465     233,872  233,872     216,073  216,073
 

Trading book

                    

    Market risks

  39,812    36,265  36,265    30,291  30,291    23,216  23,216

    Counterparty and settlement risks

  41,203    51,741  51,741     33,670  33,670     29,859  29,859
 

Total trading book

  81,015    88,006  88,006     63,961  63,961     53,075  53,075
 

Operational risk

  28,389    n/a  n/a     n/a  n/a     n/a  n/a
 

Total risk weighted assets

  353,878    353,476  353,471     297,833  297,833     269,148  269,148

Minimum requirements under the FSA’s Basel rules are expressed as a ratio of capital resources to risk weighted assets (Risk Asset Ratio). Risk weighted assets are a function of risk weights applied to the Group’s assets using calculations developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

Basel I

At 31st December 2007, the Tier 1 capital ratio was 7.8% and the risk asset ratio was 12.1%. From 31st December 2006, total net capital resources rose £7.9bn and risk weighted assets increased £55.6bn.

Tier 1 capital rose £4.4bn, including £2.3bn arising from profits attributable to equity holders of the parent net of dividends paid. Minority interests within Tier 1 capital increased £2.7bn primarily due to the issuance of reserve capital instruments and preference shares. The deduction for goodwill and intangible assets increased by £1.1bn. Tier 2 capital increased £3.1bn mainly as a result of an increase of £3.0bn of dated loan capital.

Basel II

Under Basel II, effective from 1st January 2008, the Group has been granted approval by the FSA to adopt the advanced approaches to credit and operational risk management. Pillar 1 risk weighted assets will be generated using the Group’s risk models. Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements under Basel II are Pillar 1 risk weighted assets multiplied by 8%, the internationally agreed minimum ratio.

Under Pillar 2 of Basel II, the Group is subject to an overall regulatory capital requirement (expressed in £ terms) based on individual capital guidance (‘ICG’) received from the FSA. The ICG imposes additional capital requirements in excess of Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements. Barclays received its ICG from the FSA in December 2007.

Risk weighted assets calculated on a Basel II basis are broadly in line with risk weighted assets calculated on a Basel I basis. A reduction in credit and counterparty risk weighted assets of £31.5bn more than offset the identification of capital equivalent risk weighted assets of £28.4bn attributable to operational risk. The reduced risk weighted assets attributable to credit risk were mainly driven by recognition of the low risk profile of first charge residential mortgages in UK Retail Banking and Absa and the use of internal models to assess exposures to counterparty risk in the trading book. These were partially offset by higher counterparty risk weightings in emerging markets and greater recognition of undrawn commitments.

Compared to Basel I, deductions from Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital under Basel II include additional amounts relating to expected loss and securitisations. For advanced portfolios, any excess of expected loss over impairment allowances is deducted half from Tier 1 and half from Tier 2 capital. Deductions relating to securitisation transactions, which are made from total capital under Basel I, are deducted half from Tier 1 and half from Tier 2 capital under Basel II.

For portfolios treated under the standardised approach, the inclusion of collectively assessed impairment allowances in Tier 2 capital remains the same under Basel II. Collectively assessed impairment allowances against exposures treated under Basel II advanced approaches are not eligible for direct inclusion in Tier 2 capital.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

43


Financial review

Capital resources and deposits

Total net capital resources

   Basel II      Basel I  Basel I  Basel I 
   

2007

£m

      

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

  

2005

£m

 
Capital resources (as defined for regulatory purposes)  Barclays
PLC
Group
 
 
 
    Barclays
PLC
Group
 
 
 
 Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
 
 
 
 Barclays
PLC
Group
 
 
 
 Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
 
 
 
 Barclays
PLC
Group
 
 
 
 Barclays
Bank PLC
Group
 
 
 

Tier 1

           

Called up share capital

  1,651     1,651  2,382  1,634  2,363  1,623  2,348 

Eligible reserves

  22,939     22,526  25,615  19,608  21,700  16,837  18,646 

Minority interests

  10,551     10,551  5,857  7,899  4,528  6,634  3,700 

Tier One Notes

  899     899  899  909  909  981  981 

Less: Intangible assets

  (8,191)    (8,191) (8,191) (7,045) (7,045) (7,180) (7,180)

Less: Deductions from Tier 1 capital

  (1,106)    (28) (28)        

Total qualifying tier 1 capital

  26,743     27,408  26,534  23,005  22,455  18,895  18,495 

Tier 2

           

Revaluation reserves

  26     26  26  25  25  25  25 

Available for sale equity

  295     295  295  221  221  223  223 

Collectively assessed impairment allowances

  440     2,619  2,619  2,556  2,556  2,306  2,306 

Minority interests

  442     442  442  451  451  515  515 

Qualifying subordinated liabilities

           

Undated loan capital

  3,191     3,191  3,191  3,180  3,180  3,212  3,212 

Dated loan capital

  10,578     10,578  10,578  7,603  7,603  7,069  7,069 

Less: Deductions from Tier 2 capital

  (1,106)    (28) (28)        

Total qualifying tier 2 capital

  13,866     17,123  17,123  14,036  14,036  13,350  13,350 

Less: Regulatory deductions

           

Investments not consolidated for supervisory purposes

  (633)    (633) (633) (982) (982) (782) (782)

Other deductions

  (193)    (1,256) (1,256) (1,348) (1,348) (961) (961)

Total deductions

  (826)    (1,889) (1,889) (2,330) (2,330) (1,743) (1,743)

Total net capital resources

  39,783     42,642  41,768  34,711  34,161  30,502  30,102 

44

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Financial review

Deposits and short-term borrowings

Deposits

Deposits include deposits from banks and customers accounts.

     Average: year ended 31st December  
      
      2007
£m
  2006    
£m    
  

2005

£m

 

Deposits from banks

        
Customers in the United Kingdom    15,321  12,832  9,703

Customers outside the

        

United Kingdom:

        

Other European Union

    33,162  30,116  29,092

United States

    6,656  7,352  8,670

Africa

    4,452  4,140  3,236

Rest of the World

    36,626  35,013  39,060
Total deposits from banks    96,217  89,453  89,761

 

Customer accounts

        
Customers in the United Kingdom    187,249  173,767  155,252

Customers outside the

        

United Kingdom:

        

Other European Union

    23,696  22,448  20,773

United States

    21,908  17,661  15,167

Africa

    29,855  23,560  17,169

Rest of the World

    23,032  19,992  16,911

Customer accounts

    285,740  257,428  225,272

Deposits from banks in offices in the United Kingdom from non-residents amounted to £45,162m (2006: £41,762m).

   Year ended 31st December
    2007
£m
  2006    
£m    
  2005
£m

Customer accounts

  294,987  256,754  238,684

 

In offices in the United Kingdom:

      

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest free

  33,400  25,650  22,980

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest bearing

  32,047  31,769  28,416

Savings accounts

  70,682  62,745  57,715

Other time deposits – retail

  36,123  36,110  35,142

Other time deposits – wholesale

  65,726  53,733  42,967

Total repayable in offices

in the United Kingdom

  237,978  210,007  187,220

 

In offices outside the United Kingdom:

      

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest free

  2,990  2,169  2,300

Current and Demand accounts

      

– interest bearing

  11,570  17,626  20,494

Savings accounts

  3,917  3,041  3,230

Other time deposits

  38,532  23,911  25,440
Total repayable in offices outside the United Kingdom  57,009  46,747  51,464

Customer accounts deposits in offices in the United Kingdom received from non-residents amounted to £49,179m (2006: £40,291m).

Note

aAverage interest rate during the year for commercial paper and negotiable certificates of deposit have been restated for 2006 and 2005 to reflect methodology enhancements.

Short-term borrowings

Short-term borrowings include deposits from banks, commercial paper and negotiable certificates of deposit.

Deposits from banks

Deposits from banks are taken from a wide range of counterparties and generally have maturities of less than one year.

    2007
£m
  2006    
£m    
  2005
£m

Year-end balance

  90,546  79,562      75,127

Average balance

  96,217  89,453      89,761

Maximum balance

  109,586  97,165      103,397

Average interest rate during year

  4.1%  4.2%      2.6%

Year-end interest rate

  4.0%  4.3%      3.6%

Commercial paper

Commercial paper is issued by the Group, mainly in the United States, generally in denominations of not less than US$100,000, with maturities of up to 270 days.

    2007
£m
  2006    
£m    
  2005
£m

Year-end balance

  23,451  26,546      28,275

Average balance

  26,229  29,740      22,309

Maximum balance

  30,736  31,859      28,598

Average interest rate during yeara

  5.4%  4.4%      3.1%

Year-end interest rate

  5.2%  5.0%      4.5%

Negotiable certificates of deposit

Negotiable certificates of deposits are issued mainly in the UK and US, generally in denominations of not less than US$100,000.

    2007
£m
  2006    
£m    
  2005
£m

Year-end balance

  58,401  52,800      43,109

Average balance

  55,394  49,327      45,533

Maximum balance

  62,436  60,914      53,456

Average interest rate during yeara

  5.1%  5.3%      3.9%

Year-end interest rate

  5.0%  5.1%      4.5%

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

45


Financial Review

Commitments and contractual obligations

Commitments and contractual obligations

Commitments and contractual obligations include loan commitments, contingent liabilities, debt securities and purchase obligations.

Commercial commitments

   Amount of commitment expiration per period
   Less than
one year
£m
  Between
one to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
five years
£m
  After
five years
£m
  Total
amounts
committed
£m

Acceptances and endorsements

  365        365

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  29,136  2,711  1,971  1,874  35,692

Other contingent liabilities

  6,594  1,556  416  1,151  9,717

Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions

  401  121      522

Forward asset purchases and forward deposits placed

  283        283

Standby facilities, credit lines and other

  136,457  17,039  28,127  10,211  191,834

Contractual obligations

   Payments due by period
   Less than
one year
£m
  Between
one to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
five years
£m
  After
five years
£m
  Total
£m

Long-term debt

  90,201  13,558  8,630  19,358  131,747

Operating lease obligations

  197  755  610  2,225  3,787

Purchase obligations

  141  186  27  6  360

Total

  90,539  14,499  9,267  21,589  135,894

The long-term debt does not include undated loan capital of £6,631m.

Further information on the contractual maturity of the Group’s assets and liabilities is given in Note 48.

46

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Financial review

Securities

Securities

The following table analyses the book value of securities which are carried at fair value.

   2007  2006  2005
    Book value
£m
  

Amortised
cost

£m

  Book value
£m
  

Amortised  
cost  

£m  

  Book value
£m
  

Amortised
cost

£m

Investment securities – available for sale

             

Debt securities:

             

United Kingdom government

  78  81  758  761    31  31

Other government

  7,383  7,434  12,587  12,735    14,860  14,827

Other public bodies

  634  632  280  277    216  216

Mortgage and asset backed securities

  1,367  1,429  1,706  1,706    3,062  3,062

Corporate issuers

  19,664  19,649  27,089  27,100    25,590  25,597

Other issuers

  9,547  9,599  5,492  5,450    6,265  6,257

Equity securities

  1,676  1,418  1,371  1,047    1,250  1,007

Investment securities – available for sale

  40,349  40,242  49,283  49,076    51,274  50,997

Other securities – held for trading

             

Debt securities:

             

United Kingdom government

  3,832  n/a  4,986  n/a    4,786  n/a

Other government

  51,104  n/a  46,845  n/a    46,426  n/a

Mortgage and asset backed securities

  37,038  n/a  29,606  n/a    17,644  n/a

Bank and building society certificates of deposit

  17,751  n/a  14,159  n/a    15,837  n/a

Other issuers

  43,053  n/a  44,980  n/a    43,674  n/a

Equity securities

  36,307  n/a  31,548  n/a    20,299  n/a

Other securities – held for trading

  189,085  n/a  172,124  n/a    148,666  n/a

Investment debt securities include government securities held as part of the Group’s treasury management portfolio for asset and liability, liquidity and regulatory purposes and are for use on a continuing basis in the activities of the Group. In addition, the Group holds as investments listed and unlisted corporate securities.

Mortgage and asset backed securities and other issuers within held for trading debt securities have been restated in 2006 and 2005 to reflect changes in classification of assets.

Bank and building society certificates of deposit are freely negotiable and have original maturities of up to five years, but are typically held for shorter periods. In addition to UK government securities shown above, at 31st December 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Group held the following government securities which exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.

Government securities

   2007  2006  2005
    

Book value

£m

  

Book value

£m

  

Book value

£m

United States

  15,156  18,343  16,093

Japan

  9,124  15,505  14,560

Germany

  5,136  4,741  6,376

France

  3,538  4,336  4,822

Italy

  5,090  3,419  4,300

Spain

  3,674  2,859  2,456

Netherlands

  1,270  395  2,791

Maturities and yield of available for sale debt securities

   Maturing within
one year:
  Maturing after one but
within five years:
  Maturing after five but
within ten years:
  Maturing after
ten years:
  Total:
    Amount
£m
  Yield
%
  Amount
£m
  

Yield

%

  Amount
£m
  

Yield

%

  Amount
£m
  Yield
%
  Amount
£m
  Yield
%

Government

  1,354  5.8  3,997  4.0  788  1.6  1,322  1.1  7,461  3.5

Other public bodies

  546  8.6  78  1.3      10  5.2  634  7.7

Other issuers

  11,849  5.2  12,542  4.9  4,343  5.6  1,844  7.0  30,578  5.2

 

Total book value

  13,749  5.4  16,617  4.6  5,131  5.0  3,176  4.5  38,673  5.0

The yield for each range of maturities is calculated by dividing the annualised interest income prevailing at 31st December 2007 by the fair value of securities held at that date.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

47


Financial review

Critical accounting estimates

The Group’s accounting policies are set out on pages 149 to 157.

Certain of these policies, as well as estimates made by management, are considered to be important to an understanding of the Group’s financial condition since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgements and estimates, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. The following accounting policies include estimates which are particularly sensitive in terms of judgements and the extent to which estimates are used. Other accounting policies involve significant amounts of judgements and estimates, but the total amounts involved are not significant to the financial statements. Management has discussed the accounting policies and critical accounting estimates with the Board Audit Committee.

Fair value of financial instruments

Some of the Group’s financial instruments are carried at fair value through profit or loss such as those held for trading, designated by management under the fair value option and non-cash flow hedging derivatives.

Other non-derivative financial assets may be designated as available for sale. Available for sale financial investments are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value of such assets are included as a separate component of equity. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Financial instruments entered into as trading transactions, together with any associated hedging, are measured at fair value and the resultant profits and losses are included in net trading income, along with interest and dividends arising from long and short positions and funding costs relating to trading activities. Assets and liabilities resulting from gains and losses on financial instruments held for trading are reported gross in trading portfolio assets and liabilities or derivative financial instruments, reduced by the effects of netting agreements where there is an intention to settle net with counterparties.

Valuation methodology

The method of determining the fair value of financial instruments can be analysed into the following categories:

(a)Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets where the quoted price is readily available and the price represents actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.

(b)Valuation techniques using market observable inputs. Such techniques may include:

using recent arm’s length market transactions;

reference to the current fair value of similar instruments;

discounted cash flow analysis, pricing models or other techniques commonly used by market participants.

(c)Valuation techniques used above, but which include significant inputs that are not observable. On initial recognition of financial instruments measured using such techniques the transaction price is deemed to provide the best evidence of fair value for accounting purposes.

The valuation techniques in (b) and (c) use inputs such as interest rate yield curves, equity prices, commodity and currency prices/yields, volatilities of underlyings and correlations between inputs. The models used in these valuation techniques are calibrated against industry standards, economic models and to observed transaction prices where available.

The following tables set out the total financial instruments stated at fair value as at 31st December 2007 and those fair values are calculated with valuation techniques using unobservable inputs.

   Unobservable

inputs

£m

  Total
£m
Assets stated at fair value    

Trading portfolio assets

  4,457  193,691
Financial assets designated at fair value:    

– held on own account

  16,819  56,629
– held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts    90,851

Derivative financial instruments

  2,707  248,088

Available for sale financial investments

  810  43,072
Total  24,793  632,331
   Unobservable

inputs

£m

  Total
£m
Liabilities stated at fair value    

Trading portfolio liabilities

  42  65,402
Financial liabilities designated at fair value  6,172  74,489
Liabilities to customers under investment contracts    92,639

Derivative financial instruments

  4,382  248,288
Total  10,596  480,818

Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs and these may vary from product to product and change over time. Factors include for example, the depth of activity in the relevant market, the type of product, whether the product is new and not widely traded in the market place, the maturity of market modelling and the nature of the transaction (bespoke or generic).

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, the determination of fair value can be more subjective, dependant on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation. Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to similar assets, similar maturities, appropriate proxies, or other analytical techniques. The effect of changing the assumptions for those financial instruments for which the fair values were measured using valuation techniques that are determined in full or in part on assumptions that are not supported by observable inputs to a range of reasonably possible alternative assumptions, would be to provide a range of £1.2bn (2006: £0.1bn) lower to £1.5bn (2006: £0.1bn) higher than the fair values recognised in the financial statements.

The size of this range will vary over time in response to market volatility, market uncertainty and changes to benchmark proxy relationships of similar assets and liabilities. The calculation of this range is performed on a consistent basis each period.

Further information on the fair value of financial instruments is provided in Note 49 to the accounts.

The following summary sets out those instruments which use inputs where it may be necessary to use valuation techniques as described above.

Corporate bonds

Corporate bonds are generally valued using observable quoted prices or recently executed transactions. Where observable price quotations are not available, the fair value is determined based on cash flow models where significant inputs may include yield curves, bond or single name credit default swap spreads.


48

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Mortgage whole loans

The fair value of mortgage whole loans are determined using observable quoted prices or recently executed transactions for comparable assets. Where observable price quotations or benchmark proxies are not available, fair value is determined using cash flow models where significant inputs include yield curves, collateral specific loss assumptions, asset specific prepayment assumptions, yield spreads and expected default rates.

Commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities

Commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities (ABS) (residential mortgages, credit cards, auto loans, student loans and leases) are generally valued using observable information. Wherever possible, the fair value is determined using quoted prices or recently executed transactions. Where observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models where the significant inputs may include yield curves, credit spreads, prepayment rates. Securities that are backed by the residual cash flows of an asset portfolio are generally valued using similar cash flow models.

The fair value of home equity loan bonds are determined using models which use scenario analysis with significant inputs including age, rating, internal grade, and index prices.

Collateralised debt obligations

The valuation of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) notes is first based on an assessment of the probability of an event of default occurring due to a credit deterioration. This is determined by reference to the probability of event of default occurring and the probability of exercise of contractual rights related to event of default. The notes are then valued by determining appropriate valuation multiples to be applied to the contractual cash flows. These are based on inputs including the prospective cash flow performance of the underlying securities, the structural features of the transaction and the net asset value of the underlying portfolio.

Private equity

The fair value of private equity is determined using appropriate valuation methodologies which, dependent on the nature of the investment, may include discounted cash flow analysis, enterprise value comparisons with similar companies, price:earnings comparisons and turnover multiples. For each investment the relevant methodology is applied consistently over time.

Own credit on financial liabilities

The carrying amount of financial liabilities held at fair value is adjusted to reflect the effect of changes in own credit spreads. As a result, the carrying value of issued notes that have been designated at fair value through profit and loss is adjusted by reference to the movement in the appropriate spreads. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in the income statement.

Derivatives

Derivative contracts can be exchange traded or over the counter (OTC). OTC derivative contracts include forward, swap and option contracts related to interest rates, bonds, foreign currencies, credit standing of reference entities, equity prices, fund levels, commodity prices or indices on these assets.

The fair value of OTC derivative contracts are modelled using a series of techniques, including closed form analytical formulae (such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model) and simulation based models. The choice of model is dependant on factors such as; the complexity of the product, inherent risks and hedging strategy: statistical behaviour of the underlying, and ability of the model to price consistently with observed market transactions. For many pricing models there is no material subjectivity because the methodologies employed do not necessitate significant judgement and the pricing inputs are observed from actively quoted markets, as is the case for generic interest rate swaps and option markets. In the case of more established derivative products, the pricing models used are widely accepted and used by the other market participants.

Significant inputs used in these models may include yield curves, credit spreads, recovery rates, dividend rates, volatility of underlying interest rates, equity prices or foreign exchange rates and, in some cases, correlation between these inputs. These inputs are determined with reference to quoted prices, recently executed trades, independent market quotes and consensus data.

New, long dated or complex derivative products may require a greater degree of judgement in the implementation of appropriate valuation techniques, due to the complexity of the valuation assumptions and the reduced observability of inputs. The valuation of more complex products may use more generic derivatives as a component to calculating the overall value.

Derivatives where valuation involves a significant degree of judgement include:

– Fund derivatives

Fund derivatives are derivatives whose underlyings include mutual funds, hedge funds, indices and multi asset portfolios. They are valued using underlying fund prices, yield curves and available market information on the level of the hedging risk. Some fund derivatives are valued using unobservable information, generally where the level of the hedging risk is not observable in the market. These are valued taking account of risk of the underlying fund or collection of funds, diversification of the fund by asset, concentration by geographic sector, strategy of the fund, size of the transaction and concentration of specific fund managers.

– Commodity derivatives

Commodity derivatives are valued using models where the significant inputs may include interest rate yield curves, commodity price curves, volatility of the underlying commodities and, in some cases, correlation between these inputs, which are generally observable. This approach is applied to base metal, precious metal, energy, power, gas, emissions, soft commodities and freight positions. Due to the significant time span in the various market closes, curves are constructed using differentials to a benchmark curve to ensure that all curves are valued using the dominant market base price.

– Structured credit derivatives

Collateralised synthetic obligations (CSOs)are structured credit derivatives which reference the loss profile of a portfolio of loans, debts or synthetic underlyings. The reference asset can be a corporate credit or an asset backed credit. For CSOs that reference corporate credits an analytical model is used. For CSOs on asset backed underlyings, due to the path dependent nature of a CSO on an amortising portfolio a Monte Carlo simulation is used rather than analytic approximation. The expected loss probability for each reference credit in the portfolio is derived from the single name credit default swap spread curve and in addition, for ABS references, a prepayment rate assumption. A simulation is then used to compute survival time which allows us to calculate the marginal loss over each payment period by reference to estimated recovery rates. Significant inputs include prepayment rates, cumulative default rates, and recovery rates.

Allowances for loan impairment and other credit risk provisions

Allowances for loan impairment represent management’s estimate of the losses incurred in the loan portfolios as at the balance sheet date. Changes to the allowances for loan impairment and changes to the provisions for undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided are reported in the consolidated income statement as part of the impairment charge. Provision is made for undrawn loan commitments and similar facilities if it is probable that the facility will be drawn and result in recognition of an asset at an amount less than the amount advanced.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

49


Financial review

Critical accounting estimates

Within the retail and small businesses portfolios, which comprise large numbers of small homogeneous assets with similar risk characteristics where credit scoring techniques are generally used, statistical techniques are used to calculate impairment allowances on a portfolio basis, based on historical recovery rates and assumed emergence periods. These statistical analyses use as primary inputs the extent to which accounts in the portfolio are in arrears and historical information on the eventual losses encountered from such delinquent portfolios. There are many such models in use, each tailored to a product, line of business or customer category. Judgement and knowledge is needed in selecting the statistical methods to use when the models are developed or revised. The impairment allowance reflected in the financial statements for these portfolios is therefore considered to be reasonable and supportable. The impairment charge reflected in the income statement for these portfolios is £1,605m (2006: £1,809m) and amounts to 70% (2006: 87%) of the total impairment charge on loans and advances in 2007.

For larger accounts, impairment allowances are calculated on an individual basis and all relevant considerations that have a bearing on the expected future cash flows are taken into account, for example, the business prospects for the customer, the realisable value of collateral, the Group’s position relative to other claimants, the reliability of customer information and the likely cost and duration of the work-out process. The level of the impairment allowance is the difference between the value of the discounted expected future cash flows (discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate), and its carrying amount. Subjective judgements are made in the calculation of future cash flows. Furthermore, judgements change with time as new information becomes available or as work-out strategies evolve, resulting in frequent revisions to the impairment allowance as individual decisions are taken. Changes in these estimates would result in a change in the allowances and have a direct impact on the impairment charge. The impairment charge reflected in the financial statements in relation to larger accounts is £701m (2006: £265m) or 30% (2006: 13%) of the total impairment charge on loans and advances in 2007. Further information on impairment allowances is set out on pages 84 to 85.

Goodwill

Management have to consider at least annually whether the current carrying value of goodwill is impaired. The first step of the impairment review process requires the identification of independent cash generating units, by dividing the Group business into as many largely independent income streams as is reasonably practicable. The goodwill is then allocated to these independent units. The first element of this allocation is based on the areas of the business expected to benefit from the synergies derived from the acquisition. The second element reflects the allocation of the net assets acquired and the difference between the consideration paid for those net assets and their fair value. This allocation is reviewed following business reorganisation. The carrying value of the unit, including the allocated goodwill, is compared to its fair value to determine whether any impairment exists. If the fair value of a unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill will be impaired. Detailed calculations may need to be carried out taking into consideration changes in the market in which a business operates (e.g. competitive activity, regulatory change). In the absence of readily available market price data this calculation is based upon discounting expected pre-tax cash flows at a risk adjusted interest rate appropriate to the operating unit, the determination of both of which requires the exercise of judgement. The estimation of pre-tax cash flows is sensitive to the periods for which detailed forecasts are available and to assumptions regarding the long term sustainable cash flows. While forecasts are compared with actual performance and external economic data, expected cash flows naturally reflect management’s view of future performance. The most significant amounts of goodwill relate to the Absa and Woolwich acquisitions. The goodwill impairment testing performed in 2007 indicated that none of the goodwill was impaired. Management believes that reasonable changes in key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amounts of Absa and Woolwich goodwill would not result in impairment.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets that derive their value from contractual customer relationships or that can be separated and sold and have a finite useful life are amortised over their estimated useful life. Determining the estimated useful life of these finite life intangible assets requires an analysis of circumstances, and judgement by the Bank’s management. At each balance sheet date, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances dictate, intangible assets are assessed for indications of impairment. If indications are present, these assets are subject to an impairment review. The impairment review comprises a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset with its recoverable amount: the higher of the assets’ or the cash-generating unit’s net selling price and its value in use. Net selling price is calculated by reference to the amount at which the asset could be disposed of in a binding sale agreement in an arms-length transaction evidenced by an active market or recent transactions for similar assets. Value in use is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows obtainable as a result of the asset’s continued use, including those resulting from its ultimate disposal, at a market-based discount rate on a pre-tax basis. The most significant amounts of intangible assets relate to the Absa acquisition.

Retirement benefit obligations

The Group provides pension plans for employees in most parts of the world. Arrangements for staff retirement benefits vary from country to country and are made in accordance with local regulations and customs. For defined contribution schemes, the pension cost recognised in the profit and loss account represents the contributions payable to the scheme. For defined benefit schemes, actuarial valuation of each of the scheme’s obligations using the projected unit credit method and the fair valuation of each of the scheme’s assets are performed annually in accordance with the requirements of IAS 19.

The actuarial valuation is dependent upon a series of assumptions, the key ones being interest rates, mortality, investment returns and inflation. Mortality estimates are based on standard industry and national mortality tables, adjusted where appropriate to reflect the Group’s own experience. The returns on fixed interest investments are set to market yields at the valuation date (less an allowance for risk) to ensure consistency with the asset valuation. The returns on UK and overseas equities are based on the long-term outlook for global equities at the calculation date having regard to current market yields and dividend growth expectations. The inflation assumption reflects long-term expectations of both earnings and retail price inflation.

The difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, adjusted for any historic unrecognised actuarial gains or losses and past service cost, is recognised as a liability in the balance sheet. An asset arising, for example, as a result of past over-funding or the performance of the plan investments, is recognised to the extent that it does not exceed the present value of future contribution holidays or refunds of contributions. To the extent that any unrecognised gains or losses at the start of the measurement year in relation to any individual defined benefit scheme exceed 10% of the greater of the fair value of the scheme assets and the defined benefit obligation for that scheme, a proportion of the excess is recognised in the income statement.

The Group’s IAS 19 pension surplus across all pension and post-retirement schemes as at 31st December 2007 was a surplus of £393m (2006: £817m deficit). This comprises net recognised liabilities of £1,501m (2006: £1,719m) and unrecognised actuarial gains of £1,894m (2006: £902m). The net recognised liabilities comprises retirement benefit liabilities of £1,537m (2006: £1,807m) relating to schemes that are in deficit, and assets of £36m (2006: £88m) relating to schemes that are in surplus. The Group’s IAS 19 pension surplus in respect of the main UK scheme as at 31st December 2007 was £668m (2006: £495m deficit). The estimated actuarial funding position of the main UK pension scheme as at 31st December 2007, estimated from the triennial valuation in 2004, was a surplus of £1,200m (2006: £1,300m). Cash contributions to the main UK scheme were £355m (2006: £351m).

Further information on retirement benefit obligations, including assumptions is set out in Note 30 to the accounts.


50

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Financial review

Off-balance sheet arrangements

In the ordinary course of business and primarily to facilitate client transactions, the Group enters into transactions which may involve the use of off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities (SPEs). These arrangements include the provision of guarantees, loan commitments, retained interests in assets which have been transferred to an unconsolidated SPE or obligations arising from the Group’s involvements with such SPEs.

Guarantees

The Group issues guarantees on behalf of its customers. In the majority of cases, the Group will hold collateral against the exposure, have a right of recourse to the customer or both. In addition, the Group issues guarantees on its own behalf. The main types of guarantees provided are: financial guarantees given to banks and financial institutions on behalf of customers to secure loans: overdrafts; and other banking facilities, including stock borrowing indemnities and standby letters of credit. Other guarantees provided include performance guarantees, advance payment guarantees, tender guarantees, guarantees to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and retention guarantees. The nominal principal amount of contingent liabilities with off-balance sheet risk is set out in Note 34 and in the table on page 46.

Loan commitments

The Group enters into commitments to lend to its customers subject to certain conditions. Such loan commitments are made either for a fixed period, or are cancellable by the Group subject to notice conditions. Information on loan commitments and similar facilities is set out in Note 34 and in the table on page 46.

Special purpose entities

Transactions entered into by the Group may involve the use of SPEs. SPEs are entities that are created to accomplish a narrow and well defined objective. There are often specific restrictions or limits around their ongoing activities.

Transactions with SPEs take a number of forms, including:

·

The provision of financing to fund asset purchases, or commitments to provide finance for future purchases.

·

Derivative transactions to provide investors in the SPE with a specified exposure.

·

The provision of liquidity or backstop facilities which may be drawn upon if the SPE experiences future funding difficulties.

·

Direct investment in the notes issued by SPEs.

Depending on the nature of the Group’s resulting exposure, it may consolidate the SPE on to the Group’s balance sheet. The consolidation of SPEs is considered at inception based on the arrangements in place and the assessed risk exposures at that time. In accordance with IFRS, SPEs are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the Group and the entity indicates control. Potential indicators of control include, amongst others, an assessment of the Group’s exposure to the risks and benefits of the SPE. The initial consolidation analysis is revisited at a later date if:

(i)the Group acquires additional interests in the entity;

(ii)the contractual arrangements of the entity are amended such that the relative exposures to risks and rewards change; or if

(iii)the Group acquires control over the main operating and financial decisions of the entity.

A number of the Group’s transactions have recourse only to the assets of unconsolidated SPEs. Typically, the majority of the exposure to these assets is borne by third parties and the Group’s risk is mitigated through over-collateralisation, unwind features and other protective measures. The Group’s involvement with unconsolidated third party conduits, collateralised debt obligations and structured investment vehicles is described further below.

Collateralised Debt Obligations

The Group has structured and underwritten CDOs. At inception, the Group’s exposure principally takes the form of a liquidity facility provided to support future funding difficulties or cash shortfalls in the vehicles. If required by the vehicle, the facility is drawn with the amount advanced included within loans and advances in the balance sheet. Upon an event of default or other triggering event, the Group may acquire control of a CDO and, therefore, be required to fully consolidate the vehicle for accounting purposes. The potential for transactions to hit default triggers before the end of 2008 has been assessed and included in the determination of impairment charges and other credit provisions (£782m in relation to ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposures for the year ended 31st December 2007).

The Group’s exposure to ABS CDO Super Senior positions before hedging was £6,018m as at 31st December 2007. This includes £1,149m of undrawn facilities provided to mezzanine transactions (exposure stated net of writedowns and charges). Undrawn facilities provided to unconsolidated CDOs are included as part of commitments in Note 34 to the accounts.

The remaining £4,869m is the Group’s exposure to High Grade CDOs, stated net of writedowns and charges. £3,782m of drawn balances are included within loans and advances on the balance sheet, with the remaining £1,087m representing consolidated High Grade CDOs accounted for on a fair value basis.

Collateral

The collateral underlying unconsolidated CDOs comprised 77% residential mortgage backed securities, 6% non-residential asset backed securities and 17% in other categories, including 10% ABS CDO exposure (a proportion of which will be backed by residential mortgage collateral).

The remaining Weighted Average Life (WAL) of all collateral is 3.9 years. The combined Net Asset Value (NAV) for all of the CDOs was £2.8bn below the nominal amount, equivalent to an aggregate 40.2% decline in value on average for all investors.

Funding

The CDOs were funded with senior unrated notes and rated notes up to AAA. The capital structure senior to the AAA notes on cash CDOs was supported by a liquidity facility provided by the Group. On mezzanine CDOs, this portion of the capital structure is unfunded, but a liquidity facility is provided to support the level of synthetic instruments within each transaction. The senior portion covered by liquidity facilities is on average 79% of the capital structure.

The initial WAL of the notes in issue averaged 7.1 years. The full contractual maturity is 37.8 years.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

51


Financial review

Off-balance sheet arrangements

Interests in Third Party CDOs

The Group has purchased securities in and entered into derivative instruments with third party CDOs. These interests are held as trading assets or liabilities on the Group’s balance sheet and measured at fair value. The Group has not provided liquidity facilities or similar agreements to third party CDOs.

Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs)

The Group has not structured or managed SIVs. Group exposure to third party SIVs comprised:

·

£317m of senior liquidity facilities, of which £19m was drawn and included in loans and advances as at 31st December 2007. The Group is one of between two and eight independent liquidity providers on each transaction.

·

Derivative exposures included on the balance sheet at their net fair value of £264m.

·

Bonds issued by the SIVs included within trading portfolio assets at their fair value of £21m.

·

£2.6bn repo funding facilities. £1.3bn has been utilised and included within loans and advances to customers in the balance sheet.

Other than the repo facilities, which when drawn are more than 100% collateralised by assets held by the Group with the collateral being valued daily, the items above are included in the credit market positions discussed on page 53.

SIV-Lites

The Group structured and helped to underwrite three SIV-Lite transactions. The Group is not involved in their ongoing management.

The Group provided £0.55bn in liquidity facilities as partial support to the £2.6bn of CP programmes on these transactions. These facilities have now been fully drawn or are terminated, such that no further drawings are possible. One of the three vehicles has been restructured into a cash CDO. As part of this restructuring, the Group acquired the £800m senior note in the CDO which is held at fair value within trading portfolio assets. The credit risk on this note has been transferred to a third party investment bank. For the remaining facilities, the amount drawn totalled £152m and is included on the balance sheet within loans and advances to customers and included in the credit market positions discussed on page 53.

Commercial Paper and Medium-term Note Conduits

The Group provided £19bn in undrawn backstop liquidity facilities to its own sponsored CP conduits. The Group fully consolidates these entities such that the underlying assets are reflected on the Group balance sheet.

The Group provided backstop facilities to support the paper issued by six third party conduits. These facilities totalled £1bn, with underlying collateral comprising auto loans (81%), bank-guaranteed residential mortgages (11%), bank-guaranteed commercial and project finance loans (5%) and UK consumer finance receivables (3%). Drawings on these facilities were £46m as at 31st December 2007 and are included within loans and advances to customers.

The Group provided backstop facilities to six third-party SPEs that fund themselves with medium term notes. These notes are sold to investors as a series of 12 month securities and remarketed to investors annually. If investors decline to renew their holdings at a price below a pre-agreed spread, the backstop facility requires the Group to purchase the

outstanding notes at scheduled maturity. The group has provided facilities of £2.9bn, to SPEs holding prime UK and Australian owner-occupied Residential Mortgage Back Securities (RMBS) assets. As at 31st December 2007, the Group had acquired notes of £90m under these backstop facilities (included as available for sale assets in the balance sheet) and further acquisitions are expected through 2008 as other notes are remarketed. The notes generally rank pari passu with the other term AAA+ rated notes from the same issuer. The facilities have been designated at fair value and are reflected in the balance sheet at their current fair value.

The Group’s own CP conduits provided facilities of £1.3bn to third party conduits containing prime UK buy-to-let RMBS. As at 31st December 2007, £290m of this facility had been drawn. The undrawn facilities are included within the commitments disclosed in Note 34 to the accounts, while the drawn elements are included within loans and advances to customers.

Asset securitisations

The Group has assisted companies with the formation of asset securitisations, some of which are effected through the use of SPEs. These entities have minimal equity and rely on funding in the form of notes to purchase the assets for securitisation. As these SPEs are created for other companies, the Group does not usually control these entities and therefore does not consolidate them. The Group may provide financing in the form of senior notes or junior notes and may also provide derivatives to the SPE. These transactions are included on the balance sheet.

The Group has used SPEs to securitise part of its originated and purchased retail and commercial lending portfolios and credit card receivables. These SPEs are usually consolidated and derecognition only occurs when the Group transfers its contractual right to receive cash flows from the financial assets, or retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to another party without material delay or reinvestment, and also transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, including credit risk, prepayment risk and interest rate risk. The carrying amount of securitised assets together with the associated liabilities are set out in Note 29.

Client intermediation

The Group has structured transactions as a financial intermediary to meet investor and client needs. These transactions involve entities structured by either the Group or the client and they are used to modify cash flows of third party assets to create investments with specific risk or return profiles or to assist clients in the efficient management of other risks. Such transactions will typically result in a derivative being shown on the balance sheet, representing the Group’s exposure to the relevant asset.

The Group also invests in lessor entities specifically to acquire assets for leasing. Client intermediation also includes arrangements to fund the purchase or construction of specific assets (most common in the property industry).

Fund management

The Group provides asset management services to a large number of investment entities on an arm’s-length basis and at market terms and prices. The majority of these entities are investment funds that are owned by a large and diversified number of investors. These funds are not consolidated because the Group does not own either a significant portion of the equity, or the risks and rewards inherent in the assets.

During 2007, Group operating expenses included charges of £80m (2006: £nil) related to selective support of liquidity products managed by Barclays Global Investors and not consolidated by the Group. The Group has continued to provide further selective support to liquidity products subsequent to 31st December 2007.


52 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Financial review

Barclays Capital credit market positions

Barclays Capital credit market positions

Barclays Capital credit market exposures resulted in net losses of £1,635m in 2007, due to dislocations in the credit markets. The net losses primarily related to ABS CDO super senior exposures, with additional losses from other credit market exposures partially offset by gains from the general widening of credit spreads on issued notes held at fair value.

Credit market exposures in this note are stated relative to comparatives as at 30th June 2007, being the reporting date immediately prior to the credit market dislocations.

    As at 
    

31st December
2007

£m

  

30th June
2007

£m

 

ABS CDO Super Senior

       

High Grade

  4,869  6,151 

Mezzanine

  1,149  1,629 

Exposure before hedging

  6,018  7,780 

Hedges

  (1,347) (348)

Net ABS CDO Super Senior

  4,671  7,432 

Other US sub-prime

   

Whole loans

  3,205  2,900 

Other direct and indirect exposures

  1,832  3,146 

Other US sub-prime

  5,037  6,046 

Alt-A

  4,916  3,760 

Monoline insurers

  1,335  140 

Commercial mortgages

  12,399  8,282 

SIV-lite liquidity facilities

  152  692 

Structured investment vehicles

  590  925 

ABS CDO Super Senior exposure

ABS CDO Super Senior net exposure was £4,671m (30th June 2007: £7,432m). Exposures are stated net of writedowns and charges of £1,412m (30th June 2007: £56m) and hedges of £1,347m (30th June 2007: £348m).

The collateral for the ABS CDO Super Senior exposures primarily comprised Residential Mortgage Backed Securities. 79% of the RMBS sub-prime collateral comprised 2005 or earlier vintage mortgages. On ABS CDO super senior exposures, the combination of subordination, hedging and writedowns provide protection against loss levels to 72% on US sub-prime collateral as at 31st December 2007. None of the above hedges of ABS CDO Super Senior exposures as at 31st December 2007 were held with monoline insurer counterparties.

Other credit market exposures

Barclays Capital held other exposures impacted by the turbulence in credit markets, including: whole loans and other direct and indirect exposures to US sub-prime and Alt-A borrowers; exposures to monoline

insurers; and commercial mortgage backed securities. The net losses in 2007 from these exposures were £823m.

Other US sub-prime whole loan and net trading book exposure was £5,037m (30th June 2007: £6,046m). Whole loans included £2,843m (30th June 2007: £1,886m) acquired since the acquisition of EquiFirst in March 2007, all of which were subject to Barclays underwriting criteria. As at 31st December 2007 the average loan to value of these EquiFirst loans was 80% with less than 3% at above 95% loan to value. 99% of the EquiFirst inventory was first lien.

Net exposure to the Alt-A market was £4,916m (30th June 2007: £3,760m), through a combination of securities held on the balance sheet including those held in consolidated conduits and residuals. Alt-A exposure is generally to borrowers of a higher credit quality than sub-prime borrowers. As at 31st December 2007, 99% of the Alt-A whole loan exposure was performing, and the average loan to value ratio was 81%. 96% of the Alt-A securities held were rated AAA or AA.

Barclays Capital held assets with insurance protection or other credit enhancement from monoline insurers. The value of exposure to monoline insurers under these contracts was £1,335m (30th June 2007: £140m). There were no claims due under these contracts as none of the underlying assets were in default.

Exposures in our commercial mortgage backed securities business comprised commercial real estate loans of £11,103m (30th June 2007: £7,653m) and commercial mortgage backed securities of £1,296m (30th June 2007: £629m). The loan exposures were 54% US and 43% European. The US exposures had an average loan to value of 65% and the European exposures had an average loan to value of 71%. 87% of the commercial mortgage backed securities held as at 31st December 2007 were AAA or AA rated.

Loans and advances to customers included £152m (30th June 2007: £692m) of drawn liquidity facilities in respect of SIV-lites. Total exposure to other structured investment vehicles, including derivatives, undrawn commercial paper backstop facilities and bonds held in trading portfolio assets was £590m (30th June 2007: £925m).

Leveraged Finance

At 31st December 2007, drawn leveraged finance positions were £7,368m (30th June 2007: £7,317m). The positions were stated net of fees of £130m and impairment of £58m driven by widening of corporate credit spreads.

Own Credit

At 31st December 2007, Barclays Capital had issued notes held at fair value of £57,162m (30th June 2007: £44,622m). The general widening of credit spreads affected the carrying value of these notes and as a result revaluation gains of £658m were recognised in trading income.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

53


Financial review

Average balance sheet

Average balance sheet and net interest income (year ended 31st December)

  

2007

 

2006

 

2005

  Average
balance(a)
£m
 
 
 
 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average
rate
%
 Average
balance(a)
£m
 
 
 
 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average 
rate 
 Average
balance(a)
£m
 
 
 
 Interest
£m
 
 
 Average
rate
%

Assets

         

Loans and advances to banksb:

         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 29.431  1,074  3.6 18,401  647  3.5  14,798  454  3.1

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 12,262  779  6.4 12,278  488  4.0  11,063  403  3.6

Loans and advances to customersb:

         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 205,707  13,027  6.3 184,392  11,247  6.1  172,398  10,229  5.9

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 88,212  6,733  7.6 77,615  4,931  6.4  50,699  2,975  5.9

Lease receivables:

         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 4,822  283  5.9 5,266  300  5.7  6,521  348  5.3

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 5,861  691  11.8 6,162  595  9.7  1,706  117  6.9

Financial investments:

         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 37,803  2,039  5.4 41,125  1,936  4.7  43,133  1,755  4.1

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 14,750  452  3.1 14,191  830  5.8  10,349  467  4.5
Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 211,709  9,644  4.6 166,713  6,136  3.7  156,292  4,617  3.0

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 109,012  5,454  5.0 100,416  5,040  5.0  92,407  2,724  2.9

Trading portfolio assets:

         

– in offices in the United Kingdom

 120,691  5,926  4.9 106,148  4,166  3.9  81,607  2,710  3.3

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

 57,535  3,489  6.1 61,370  2,608  4.2  57,452  2,116  3.7

 

Total average interest earning assets

 897,795  49,591  5.5 794,077  38,924  4.9  698,425  28,915  4.1

Impairment allowances/provisions

 (4,435)   (3,565)   (3,105)  

Non-interest earning assets

 422,834       310,949       278,328      

 

Total average assets and interest income

 1,316,194  49,591  3.8 1,101,461  38,924  3.5  973,648  28,915  3.0
Percentage of total average interest earning assets in offices outside the United Kingdom 32.0%    34.3%    32.0%   

Total average interest earning assets related to:

         

Interest income

  49,591  5.5  38,924  4.9   28,915  4.1

Interest expense

    (37,892) 4.2    (30,385) 3.8     (20,965) 3.0
     11,699  1.3    8,539  1.1     7,950  1.0

Notes

aAverage balances are based upon daily averages for most UK banking operations and monthly averages elsewhere.

bLoans and advances to customers and banks include all doubtful lendings, including non-accrual lendings. Interest receivable on such lendings has been included to the extent to which either cash payments have been received or interest has been accrued in accordance with the income recognition policy of the Group.

54 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOCorporate sustainability

Sustainability and Barclays

At Barclays, we recognise that our sustainability values have an increased importance in the current financial climate. We are focused on: supporting our existing customers; being a bank that welcomes all potential customers; being an equal opportunity employer; our commitment to climate change; and ensuring we behave at all times as a responsible global citizen.

Doing this effectively helps us to reduce our risk and positions us well to capture commercial opportunities arising from the global transition towards a more sustainable future.

Developing our strategic framework

To measure our success in integrating sustainability into our business we have addressed the broad sustainability agenda through five key themes:

 

Customers and Clients

Average balance sheet

Inclusive Banking

Diversity and Our People

Environment

Responsible Global Citizenship

These themes resonate in our businesses, provide a platform for action, and net interest income (year ended 31st December)give us a clear purpose and direction. Implementation is driven by actionable goals and robust performance measurement.

We manage and report our progress on the sustainability topics of most significance to our business and our stakeholders. We have determined this in part through:

 

   

2007

  

2006

  

2005

   Average
balance(a)
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average
rate
%
  Average
balance(a)
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average

rate

%

  Average
balance(a)
£m
  Interest
£m
  Average
rate

%

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

                  

Deposits by banks:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  63,902  2,511  3.9  62,236  2,464  4.0   54,801  1,665  3.0

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  27,596  1,225  4.4  23,438  1,137  4.9   21,921  705  3.2

Customer accounts:

                  

demand deposits:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  29,110  858  2.9  25,397  680  2.7   22,593  510  2.3

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  13,799  404  2.9  10,351  254  2.5   6,196  88  1.4

Customer accounts:

                  

savings deposits:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  55,064  2,048  3.7  57,734  1,691  2.9   52,569  1,570  3.0

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  4,848  128  2.6  3,124  74  2.4   1,904  39  2.0

Customer accounts:

                  

other time deposits – retail:

                  

– in offices in the United Kingdom

  30,578  1,601  5.2  34,865  1,548  4.4   33,932  1,470  4.3

– in offices outside the United Kingdom

  12,425  724  5.8  8,946  482  5.4   6,346  260  4.1

Customer accounts:

                  

other time deposits – wholesale:

                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  52,147  2,482  4.8  45,930  1,794  3.9   41,745  1,191  2.9
– in offices outside the United Kingdom  24,298  1,661  6.8  23,442  1,191  5.1   12,545  590  4.7
Debt securities in issue:                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  41,552  2,053  4.9  47,216  1,850  3.9   46,583  1,631  3.5
– in offices outside the United Kingdom  94,271  5,055  5.4  74,125  3,686  5.0   52,696  1,695  3.2
Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities principally:                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  12,972  763  5.9  13,686  777  5.7   11,286  605  5.4
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  169,272  7,616  4.5  141,862  5,080  3.6   130,767  3,634  2.8
– in offices outside the United Kingdom  118,050  5,051  4.3  86,693  4,311  5.0   80,391  2,379  3.0
Trading portfolio liabilities:                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  47,971  2,277  4.7  49,892  2,014  4.0   44,349  1,737  3.9
– in offices outside the United Kingdom  29,838  1,435  4.8  39,064  1,352  3.5   36,538  1,196  3.3

 

Total average interest bearing liabilities

  827,693  37,892  4.6  748,001  30,385  4.1   657,162  20,965  3.2
Interest free customer deposits:                  
– in offices in the United Kingdom  34,109      27,549      25,095    
– in offices outside the United Kingdom  3,092      2,228      2,053    
Other non-interest bearing liabilities  421,473      297,816      267,531    
Minority and other interests and shareholders’ equity  29,827        25,867        21,807      
Total average liabilities, shareholders’ equity and interest expense  1,316,194  37,892  2.9  1,101,461  30,385  2.8   973,648  20,965  2.2
Percentage of total average interest bearing non-capital liabilities in offices outside the United Kingdom  39.4%        36.1%        33.3%      

our research initiatives and partnerships

Note

aAverage balances are based upon daily averages for most UK banking operations

dialogue with our stakeholders including customers, investors governments, non-governmental organisations, consumer groups, and monthly averages elsewhere.journalists across our markets globally

internal and external focus groups including hosting consumer roundtables in the UK.

Stakeholder insight and feedback on our sustainability agenda is vital, and encourages us to be open and transparent about the issues our stakeholders are concerned about.

Measuring progress

We aim to measure and monitor our sustainability progress both internally and externally. In 2008, we developed a framework for regular progress reports to the Group Executive Committee and the Board. It provides consistent tracking of our progress by sustainability theme and Business Unit.

Barclays participates in a number of external indices, forums and initiatives which help to measure our progress including the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and FTSE4Good. In 2008, Barclays ranked joint first in the Carbon Disclosure Project’s Leadership Index.

Customers and clients

In 2008, amid widespread uncertainty in financial markets and the wider global economy, it was vital to stay close to our clients and customers, who we recognise have a choice where they bank.

During the year, we worked to help our customers and clients cope with the challenging economic circumstances. Our record of lending responsibly has allowed us to continue mortgage lending in the UK, increasing our share of net new lending from 8% in 2007 to 36% in 2008.

We increased lending to UK SMEs by 6% to a total of £15bn. We also provided support to small businesses in the UK and South Africa and also made significant investment in the Barclays Business Support team which is dedicated to helping business customers in financial difficulty in the UK.

In addition, we have committed to lend an additional 10% (£1.5bn) to SMEs in the UK by the end of 2009. We continue to act on customer and client feedback to develop appropriate products and services to meet different needs.

Inclusive banking

For Barclays, inclusive banking means helping those who are excluded from the financial system to join and benefit from it.

We have dedicated accounts for people on low incomes across several countries in Africa. In 2008, these basic accounts made up 27% of our total current and savings accounts in Africa.

Absa, which has 10 million customers, is now the market leader for low income customers in South Africa – those earning less than R3,000 (£200) a month – with a market share of 33%.

We continued to support better access to financial products and services in the UK through our basic-level Cash Card Account, which is now held by more than 730,000 customers, and through partnerships with community finance organisations and charities which help excluded and vulnerable people in society.

In March 2008, Barclays launched the ‘Hello Money’ service in India which allows customers to carry out banking transactions easily and securely over their mobile phones. Hello Money is already making a significant impact in giving access to financial services for people in India’s rural areas.

Diversity and Our People

Barclays aims to provide a safe working environment in which employees are treated fairly and with respect, encouraged to develop, and rewarded on the basis of individual performance.


LOGO

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

55


Financial review

Average balance sheet

Changes in net interest income – volume and rate analysis

The following tables allocate changes in net interest income between changes in volume and changes in interest rates for the last two years. Volume and rate variances have been calculated on the movement in the average balances and the change in the interest rates on average interest earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. Where variances have arisen from changes in both volumes and interest rates, these have been allocated proportionately between the two.

   2007/2006 Change due to
increase/(decrease) in:
  2006/2005 Change due to
increase/(decrease) in:
  2005/2004aChange due
to increase/(decrease) in:
 
   Total
change
£m
 
 
 
 Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
 
 
 Total
change
£m
 
 
 
 Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
  Total
change
£m
  Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
 
 

 

Interest receivable

            

Treasury bills and other eligible bills:

            

– in offices in the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (68)  (68) n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (63)  (63) n/a 
   n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (131)  (131) n/a 

 

Loans and advances to banks:

            

– in offices in the UK

  427  402  25  193  121  72  (237)  (115) (122)

– in offices outside the UK

  291  (1) 292  85  46  39  132  45  87 
   718  401  317  278  167  111  (105)  (70) (35)

 

Loans and advances to customers:

            

– in offices in the UK

  1,780  1,337  443  1,018  726  292  1,419  1,681  (262)

– in offices outside the UK

  1,802  728  1,074  1,956  1,695  261  1,705  787  918 
   3,582  2,065  1,517  2,974  2,421  553  3,124  2,468  656 

 

Lease receivables:

            

– in offices in the UK

  (17) (26) 9  (48) (70) 22  128  78  50 

– in offices outside the UK

  96  (30) 126  478  413  65  96  91  5 
   79  (56) 135  430  343  87  224  169  55 

 

Debt securities:

            

– in offices in the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (2,129)  (2,129) n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (338)  (338) n/a 
   n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (2,467)  (2,467) n/a 

 

Financial investments:

            

– in offices in the UK

  103  (165) 268  181  (85) 266  1,755  1,755  n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  (378) 32  (410) 363  202  161  467  467  n/a 
   (275) (133) (142) 544  117  427  2,222  2,222  n/a 

 

External trading assets:

            

– in offices in the UK and

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (4,971)  (4,971) n/a 

– outside the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (2,224)  (2,224) n/a 
   n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (7,195)  (7,195) n/a 

 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

            

– in offices in the UK

  3,508  1,865  1,643  1,519  324  1,195  4,617  4,617  n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  414  430  (16) 2,316  254  2,062  2,724  2,724  n/a 
   3,922  2,295  1,627  3,835  578  3,257  7,341  7,341  n/a 

 

Trading portfolio assets:

            

– in offices in the UK

  1,760  621  1,139  1,456  907  549  2,710  2,710  n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  881  (172) 1,053  492  151  341  2,116  2,116  n/a 
   2,641  449  2,192  1,948  1,058  890  4,826  4,826  n/a 

 

Total interest receivable:

            

– in offices in the UK

  7,561  4,034  3,527  4,319  1,923  2,396  3,224  3,558  (334)

– in offices outside the UK

  3,106  987  2,119  5,690  2,761  2,929  4,615  3,605  1,010 
   10,667  5,021  5,646  10,009  4,684  5,325  7,839  7,163  676 

Note

a 2004 figures do not reflect the applications of IAS 32 and IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

56 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 53


LOGOLOGO

In 2008, Antony Jenkins, CEO Barclaycard was appointed Diversity and Inclusion Executive Champion to drive our diversity agenda across Global Retail and Commercial Banking. Initiatives in 2008 included establishing the requirement that every senior executive has a diversity objective linked to their performance goals.

In 2009, we intend to extend our Women’s Leadership Programme, aimed at developing talented women employees, across all 15 countries in our GRCB – Emerging Markets business with secondments of between 3 and 12 months.

ChangesEnvironment

We seek to minimise our environmental impact through reducing Barclays energy, water and waste footprints and managing the risks and opportunities associated with climate change.

Businesses have a vital role to play in net interest income – volumemanaging and rate analysismitigating climate change. At Barclays, we recognise that we have an impact on the environment both directly through our own operations, and indirectly through our supply chain and corporate lending. We monitor and manage both sets of impacts.

   2007/2006 Change due to
increase/(decrease) in:
  2006/2005 Change due to
increase/(decrease) in:
  2005/2004aChange due
to increase/(decrease) in:
 
   Total
change
£m
 
 
 
 Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
 
 
 Total
change
£m
 
 
 
 Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
  Total
change
£m
 
 
 
 Volume
£m
 
 
 Rate
£m
 
 

Interest payable

           

Deposits by banks:

           

– in offices in the UK

  47  66  (19) 799  247  552  440  231  209 

– in offices outside the UK

  88  190  (102) 432  52  380  395  121  274 
   135  256  (121) 1,231  299  932  835  352  483 

Customer accounts – demand deposits:

           

– in offices in the UK

  178  105  73  170  68  102  200  28  172 

– in offices outside the UK

  150  95  55  166  80  86  57  36  21 
   328  200  128  336  148  188  257  64  193 

Customer accounts – savings deposits:

           

– in offices in the UK

  357  (81) 438  121  152  (31)  245  145  100 

– in offices outside the UK

  54  45  9  35  28  7  18  16  2 
   411  (36) 447  156  180  (24)  263  161  102 

Customer accounts – other time deposits – retail:

           

– in offices in the UK

  53  (204) 257  78  41  37  164  (23) 187 

– in offices outside the UK

  242  200  42  222  125  97  142  59  83 
   295  (4) 299  300  166  134  306  36  270 

Customer accounts – other time deposits – wholesale:

           

– in offices in the UK

  688  263  425  603  129  474  (653) (479) (174)

– in offices outside the UK

  470  45  425  601  550  51  248  (16) 264 
   1,158  308  850  1,204  679  525  (405) (495) 90 

Debt securities in issue:

           

– in offices in the UK

  203  (240) 443  219  22  197  398  507  (109)

– in offices outside the UK

  1,369  1,063  306  1,991  850  1,141  1,359  323  1,036 
   1,572  823  749  2,210  872  1,338  1,757  830  927 

Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities principally in offices in the UK

  (14) (41) 27  172  135  37  (87) (78) (9)

External trading liabilities:

           

– in offices in the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (5,611) (5,611) n/a 

– outside the UK

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (1,805) (1,805) n/a 
   n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (7,416) (7,416) n/a 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

           

– in offices in the UK

  2,536  1,090  1,446  1,446  329  1,117  3,634  3,634  n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  740  1,402  (662) 1,932  200  1,732  2,379  2,379  n/a 
   3,276  2,492  784  3,378  529  2,849  6,013  6,013  n/a 

Trading portfolio liabilities:

           

– in offices in the UK

  263  (80) 343  277  222  55  1,737  1,737  n/a 

– in offices outside the UK

  83  (366) 449  156  85  71  1,196  1,196  n/a 
   346  (446) 792  433  307  126  2,933  2,933  n/a 

Internal funding of trading businesses

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,045  2,045  n/a 

Total interest payable:

           

– in offices in the UK

  4,311  878  3,433  3,885  1,345  2,540  2,512  2,136  376 

– in offices outside the UK

  3,196  2,674  522  5,535  1,970  3,565  3,989  2,309  1,680 
   7,507  3,552  3,955  9,420  3,315  6,105  6,501  4,445  2,056 

Movement in net interest income

           

Increase/(decrease) in interest receivable

  10,667  5,021  5,646  10,009  4,684  5,325  7,839  7,163  676 

(Increase)/decrease in interest payable

  (7,507) (3,552) (3,955) (9,420) (3,315) (6,105)  (6,501) (4,445) (2,056)
   3,160  1,469  1,691  589  1,369  (780)  1,338  2,718  (1,380)

NoteIn 2008, Barclays set environmental targets that apply to global operations. We will measure our performance over three years from 2009 to 2011 against a 2008 baseline.

a 2004 figures do not reflect the applications of IAS 32 and IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.The targets are to reduce:

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

 

57CO2 emissions by 6% per employee, achieving an average 2% reduction per year

 

energy use from buildings (excluding data centres) by 6% per employee, achieving an average 2% reduction per year

water use by 6% per employee, achieving an average 2% reduction per year.


Corporate sustainability

Corporate sustainability

For Barclays, thereWe made our UK and European operations carbon neutral by offsetting emissions from energy use and travel. We are two separate but mutually dependent aspectson track to sustainability. One is our duty as a bank to provide sound and enduring returns for our shareholders, and the best possible services for our customers. The other is our responsibility to conductmake our global business ethically,banking operations carbon neutral by the end of 2009.

Environmental and with full regard to wider social and environmental considerations. Our ambition is to develop both of these complementary strands as we move forward.

Barclays as a sustainable bank

Banks are central to every society; they provide the funding that facilitates business and entrepreneurship, support a sound financial system, and help to create jobs and wealth. As one of the world’s leading banks, with nearly 135,000 employees and operations in over 50 countries across the world, Barclays plays a significant role, whether it is working with governments on major infrastructure projects or bringing mainstream banking to customers in emerging markets.

In all of this, the customer is absolutely central. If we are to make sustainable banking successful, and successful banking sustainable, we must put our customers at the heart of everything we do, and build our services around them. We must earn – and keep – their trust by ensuring that the products we sell are understandable and appropriate.

This may seem like a statement of the obvious, but the banking sector in general has not always had a reputation for doing this. We want to change that. This aspiration covers every aspect of our business and every stage in a customer’s relationship with us, from the purchase of a Barclays product for the first time, to the way we assess applications for loans, to the more general aspects of customer service such as complaints-handling, confidentiality, and security.

Focusing more on the customer is also an integral part of what we call ‘inclusive banking’. This is partly about appealing to the broadest possible range of people as part of our strategic move into mass-market services in our emerging markets businesses, and partly about understanding the exact nature of our local customer base, and adapting our business model and product range accordingly.

A good example is our approach to basic banking accounts. In the UK we now have over 660,000 customers who have our basic Cash Card Account, and we have been working closely with consumer groups and third parties such as housing associations to ensure that these accounts are easily accessible and the product features and communications are tailored to meet their needs. In Africa the potential for growth in this area is enormous: over 100 million of the continent’s people have yet to be brought into mainstream banking, and could in time buy a whole range of other financial services. Absa has been a pioneer of basic banking in South Africa, and has attracted over 4 million customers to these accounts. The same thinking is now being applied in other African markets and India, with new basic banking products being developed. We are also distributing these products through new and innovative formats such as express branches and direct sales agents, alongside our traditional branches.

This is another lesson we have learnt from our South African operations. In Ghana our microbanking programme is now working with over 500 Susu collectors and reaching over 280,000 market traders across the country. The programme is being extended to other intermediaries such as credit unions, trade associations, microfinance institutions and church groups.

Responsible lending

We have reported on this issue in our recent Corporate Responsibility reviews, setting out our approach to what remains a high-profile and intractable issue, especially in the UK. In the last year we have continued to enforce strict criteria on new credit card applications, using a scoring system that takes over 400 variables into account when assessing an applicant’s likely ability to manage their credit. Around 50% of applications for credit cards are declined as a result. We have also extended our data-sharing collaboration with the UK credit reference agencies: pooling information about cash advances and minimum payments is proving to be an effective way of flagging up those customers who are in danger of incurring serious debt problems. We have a new unit that can step in at this stage and offer support and guidance to get their finances back on track.

We are also testing a new product, Barclaycard Freedom, which combines a credit card and the features of a structured loan, making it easier for people to manage their borrowing and keep their interest payments down.

Customer service

We have a strategic priority to be the best bank in the UK. In the last twelve months we have started to roll all our various customer initiatives into what we are calling ‘Real Retail’. We are sharing best practice more actively, and both managers and employees are getting new powers to make decisions, and tailor their product range, based on local customer needs.

Real Retail also includes a new programme to telephone customers to ask about the quality of our service and products they have purchased. Over 20,000 calls have been made so far, and the feedback is being channelled back to our product development teams.

Risk managementrisk

The incorporationmajority of the environmental and social risks into mainstream commercial credit assessments is an area where Barclays has demonstrated genuine leadership.associated with our business are indirect. These impacts arise through business relationships, including those with our supply chain and those with our clients through financing activities.

We have beenapply our Environmental and Social Impact Assessment policy (ESIA) to projects that we are considering financing. In 2008, a membertotal of 31 project finance deals were assessed against the Equator Principles, since their inception,a set of social and currently chairenvironmental criteria adopted by many banks. In addition, the Steering Committee for the group of Equator banks. Environmental Risk Management team assessed 229 non-project finance transactions.

We continue to assess our environmental and social impact beyond the project finance remit of these principles (see table on page 59)the Equator Principles and are working to include climate change and human rights risks. considerations in these assessments.

Responsible global citizenship

We nowacknowledge and accept that we have ten briefing notes for all lending coveringan obligation to be a wide range ofresponsible global citizen, and our sustainability efforts help us to achieve this. This means managing our business and supply chain to improve our social, economic and environmental risks. These notes set outimpact, and doing business ethically.

Community Investment

Investing in the communities in which we operate is an overviewintegral part of Barclays sustainability strategy. During 2008, we maintained our levels of investment in communities despite the risks facing different sectors,challenging conditions. We invested £52.2m and more than 57,000 colleagues in 31 countries were involved in volunteering, fundraising and regular giving. In addition, Barclays launched a three-year global community investment partnership with UNICEF, the waysleading children’s organisation, in which we committed to invest £5m.

Human Rights and Barclays

In June 2008, we refined our statement on human rights (first introduced in 2004) which outlines the approach we take to human rights through our three main areas of impact – as an employer, as a provider of financial services to customers and clients, and as a purchaser of goods and services from suppliers. We aim to operate in accordance with the:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

International Labour Organisation’s Core Conventions.

Barclays is active in developing the global business and human rights agenda through our membership of two organisations – the Business Leaders’ Initiative on Human Rights, launched in 2003 of which we are a founder member, and United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), for which we co-chair the Human Rights Workstream.

We extended the guidance provided to our employees on human rights in 2008 to include access to an online tool for front-line lending managers, which assists in identifying and mitigating human rights risks.

Supply chain

We work closely with our suppliers to help them manage their own impacts and ensure they can be mitigated,share our commitment to sustainability. Our Group-wide sourcing process includes criteria for measuring and assessing our suppliers’ sustainability. Tenders for supplies deemed to have a potentially high sustainability impact or risk, such as wellprint or corporate wear, require suppliers to complete our sustainable supply chain questionnaire on their sustainability impact, policies and management processes.

During 2008, we continued to engage directly with our suppliers on sustainability, both as the legislativepart of our ongoing supplier relationships and regulatory environment applicable to that industry. A good example of this process in practice in 2007 is Absa’s involvement with the Bujagali Hydropower project in Uganda. A rigorous social and environmental assessment was carried out, and the results were incorporated into the final plans.address specific issues such as reducing their carbon emissions.


 

LOGO

5854 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOOur people

 

Barclays asaims to provide a responsible global citizensafe working environment in which employees are treated fairly and with respect, encouraged to develop, and rewarded on the basis of individual performance. We are committed to ensuring equality to all employees on the basis of merit. Discrimination, bullying or harassment of any kind is not tolerated.

Twenty years agoOur Guiding Principles set out the idea of ‘corporate citizenship’ described a company’s community activities, which rarely extended beyond philanthropic donations. Public understanding of the responsibilities of business has evolved considerably since then. For us, being a responsible global citizen does not just cover our award-winning community investment programme, but also includesvalues that govern how we behave as an employer, and how we manage Barclays wider social and environmental impacts.act. They are:

Climate change has become the single biggest challenge the world faces at the beginning of the 21st century, and in response we are focusing increasingly on our work on the environment, which includes both our direct and indirect impacts.

The environment

As a major financial services organisation we want to take a lead in helping our clients thrive in a lower-carbon future, and use our position to press for appropriate policies and regulatory frameworks to deal with climate change. We will be 100% carbon neutral globally by next year. We remain committed to increasing our energy efficiency, and reducing our carbon footprint on an ongoing basis, as well as helping our supply chain reduce its emissions.

We also believe we can make a positive impact though the products and services we offer, and the lending decisions we make. In 2007, we invested further in our emissions trading capability, and moved into the consumer market with new lower-carbon products and services.

An example is Barclaycard Breathe, a new card that gives consumers incentives when they buy green products, and donates half its profits to environmental projects. In the wholesale market we have Barclays Capital’s commitment to the EU emissions trading market, where it brings its full range of commodity trading and risk management expertise to bear to help clients manage their carbon risk. Since 2005 we have traded over 600 million tonnes of carbon credits, with a notional value of over $14 billion.

Project Finance Deals – whole Barclays Group

Category  A
Higher
Risk
  B
Medium
Risk
  C
Lower
Risk
  Total
2007
  Total
2006

Number of project finance deals

  7  18  29  54  36

Deals completed or pending

  4  12  29  45  30

– of which, number where sustainability related changes were made.

  4  12  29  45  30

Deals considered, but not participated in

  3  6  0  9  6

Projects referred from EU

  5  9  24  38  25

Projects referred from Africa

  2  1  4  7  5

Projects referred from Asia Pacific

  0  4  1  5  3

Projects referred from North America

  0  4  0  4  3

Our supply chain

Since 2006 we have required all new and high-risk suppliers to provide us detailed information about their social, environmental and ethical performance. In the last year Absa adapted it for the special conditions of the South African market.

Measuring the emissions generated from a company’s supply chain is also becoming increasingly important, and we are engaging more with our own suppliers on this. This included a special forum for nine key suppliers, which has been followed up with one-to-one discussions to ascertain the proportion of each firm’s emissions that are attributable to us. We have identified a number of ways to help suppliers address their emissions, and now have a working group in place to take these ideas forward in 2008.

Human rights

We have represented the banking sector on the Business Leaders’ Initiative on Human Rights since its launch in 2003 and, since October 2006, have co-chaired the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI) human rights work stream. During 2007 we worked as part of a team of 12 financial institutions to develop an online tool for UNEPFI that provides guidance on human rights issues associated with corporate lending. It is designed to help identify potential risks and how they may be reduced or managed. The guidance covers specific issues relevant to different sectors, ranging from employment terms and conditions, to health and safety, to child labour, to relocation of communities, among many others.

Project finance deals by sector  Project
finance a
deals
  Non project
finance deals
referred to E
and S Risk
Team

Agriculture and Fisheries

  0  4

Forestry and Logging

  0  16

Manufacturing

  3  30

Chemicals, pharmaceuticals manufacturing and bulk storage

  1  6

Mining and Metals

  6  91

Power generationb

  16  118

Oil and gas

  4  41

Utilities and Waste Management

  5  7

Infrastructure (including dams, pipelines)

  9  26

Service Industry

  10  7

Totals

  54  346

Note

aProject finance as defined by Basel II www.bis.org/publ/bcbs118.pdf.

bOf which non-fossil fuel deals contributed 9 and 89 to project finance deals and non-project finance deals referred to E and S Team respectively.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007i)

 59

Winning together

–  

Doing what’s right for Barclays, our teams and our colleagues, to achieve collective and individual success.
ii)

Best people

Developing and upgrading talented colleagues and differentiating rewards
Doing what’s needed to ensure a leading position in the global financial services industry.
iii)

Customer and

client focus

Understanding what our customers and client focus clients want and need
And then serving them brilliantly.
iv)PioneeringDriving new ideas, especially those that make us profitable and improve control
Improving operational excellence
Adding diverse skills to stimulate new perspectives and bold steps
v)TrustedBeing trusted is the bedrock of a successful bank
Acting with the highest levels of integrity to retain the trust of our customers, external stakeholders and our colleagues
Taking full responsibility for our decisions and actions.


Corporate sustainability

Barclays – an international picture

 

   2007  2006 

FTE by world region

       

UK

  61,900  62,400 

Africa & Middle East

  51,748  44,326 

Continental Europe

  9,750  8,100 

Americas

  6,413  4,905 

Asia Pacific

  5,089  2,869 

Total

  134,900  122,600 

Global employment statistics

       

FTE

  134,900  122,600 

Total employee headcount

  141,885  133,529 

Percentage of female employees

  56.3% 60.6%

Percentage of female senior executives

  13.7% 12.2%

Percentage of female senior managers

  20.6% 20.8%

Percentage working part time

  12.4% 13.6%

Turnover rate

  18.3% 16.9%

Resignation rate

  12.3% 10.9%

Sickness absence rate

  3.0% 3.6%

Barclays UK employees

   
    2007a  2006b 

UK employment statistics

   

Total employee headcount

  61,900  62,400 

Average length of service (years)

  9.7  9.8 

Percentage working part time

  16.8% 21.8%

Sickness absence rate

  3.0% 4.0%

Turnover rate

  16.6% 19.0%

Resignation rate

  11.1% 12.0%

Women in Barclays

   

Percentage of all employees

  58.0% 61.0%

Percentage of management grades

  28.4% 33.0%

Percentage of senior executives

  13.0% 12.9%

Ethnic minorities in Barclays

   

Percentage of all employees

  12.3% 12.7%

Percentage of management grades

  10.0% 8.1%

Percentage of senior executives

  6.6% 6.1%

Disabled employees in Barclays

   

Percentage of all employees

  3.4% 5.0%

Age profile

   

Employees aged under 25

  16.5% 17.4%

Employees aged 25-29

  17.0% 15.9%

Employees aged 30-49

  54.2% 56.0%

Employees aged 50+

  10.3% 10.7%

Pensions

   
Barclays Bank UK Retirement Fund active members  53,473  55,558 

Current pensioners

  48,607  43,754 

An international picture

 

        
    2008  2007a
FTE by world region      

UK

  60,700  61,900

Africa and Middle East

  55,700  51,748

Continental Europe

  13,400  9,750

Americas

  15,700  6,413

Asia Pacific

  10,800  5,089

Total

  156,300  134,900
FTE by business unit      

UK Retail Banking

  30,400  30,700

Barclays Commercial Bank

  9,800  9,200

Barclaycard

  9,600  8,900

GRCB – Western Europe

  10,900  8,800

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  22,700  13,900

GRCB – Absa

  36,800  35,800

Barclays Capital

  23,100  16,200

Barclays Global Investors

  3,700  3,400

Barclays Wealth

  7,900  6,900

Head office and other operations

  1,400  1,100

Total

  156,300  134,900
Global employment statistics    

FTE

  156,300  134,900

Total employee headcount

  161,000  141,885

Percentage of female employees

  53.1%  56.3%

Percentage of female senior executives

  15.2%  13.7%

Percentage of female senior managers

  24.6%  20.6%

Percentage working part time

  8.5%  12.4%

Turnover rate

  20.9%  18.3%

Resignation rate

  12.1%  12.3%

Sickness absence rateb

  2.3%  3.0%

NotesNote

 

a2007 UK data – includes 1,000 BGI employeesemployees.

 

b2006 UK data – excludes 800Excludes Group Centre, BGI employeesand Barclays Capital.

Barclays as an employer

cExcludes BGI and Barclays Capital.

One of our guiding principles is to develop the best people, and in such an intensely competitive industry we want to find, develop and retain the best talent. We are committed to diversity as a way of helping to ensure we are able to attract the best people. We have a wide range of development and leadership programmes for employees, and a policy that ensures that they are all treated with respect, regardless of age, race, sexuality, gender or disability.

dExcludes BGI.

 

We use ourGlobal governance

Barclays manages its people through these Guiding Principles in a devolved manner. To maintain the right balance between overall control and effective local decision making we have established governance frameworks which are overseen by the Group Operational Committee, and compliance with them is monitored by the Group Human Resources Risk Committee.

Employee relations

Barclays recognises and works constructively with 30 employee representative organisations throughout the world. Employee consultations on significant operational changes are carried out in accordance with local legislation.

Our employee opinion surveys

Barclays businesses conduct employee opinion surveys, to understandsuit the needs of each business. We benchmark the findings against other global financial services organisations and engage our employees. We continuehigh-performing organisations, and create action plans to score well but we are working to improve our scores further.address any areas of concern.

As we grow internationally our workforce becomes ever more diverse, reflectingOccupational health and safety

Barclays manages health and safety at a local level under the worldwide markets in which we operate. The percentage of UK ethnic minority employees has increased significantly from 7.2% in 2001, to 12.3% in 2007. As we grow we are determined to build the local talent base in the markets in which we operate, we see this as a crucial success factor for us in emerging markets. In the UK we also continued to invest in the disability mentoring and ‘reasonable adjustments’ schemes in 2007, and have again been ranked in the top 20 of Stonewall’s listrequirements of the best employers for lesbian, gayhealth and bisexual people.

These are clear successes; but we have much more worksafety governance framework. Key data on health and safety is reported regularly to do on our gender balance, especially at senior level: 20.6% of our senior managers are women. The drive to improve this comes from the very top of the bank.Board HR and Remuneration Committee.

Barclays in the communityTraining and educating our people

Barclays has always been a proudDeveloping both existing and committed investor in its communities. In 2007 we invested £52.4 million in communities around the world and 44,000 Barclaysnew employees in 26 countries were involved in our fundraising and volunteering initiatives. Our flagship programme, Banking on Brighter Futures, enabled us to use our skills and expertise, as well as our money, to maximum effect helping people improve their economic prospects, especially those in poverty, disadvantage, and debt. Projects ranged from supporting elderly people in the UK who are in financial difficulty through to helping Ugandan women affected by HIV/AIDS to set up their own businesses. This is not just about good works: the more we help individuals and communities improve their economic circumstances and financial literacy, the better the environment in which we operate.

We are investing $150 million over the next five years in the Banking on Brighter Futures programme. 1,500 projects will be supported around the world, and employees will be encouraged to volunteer 150,000 hours of their time on projects focusing on financial education, entrepreneurship, employment and financial inclusion.

Governance

Corporate responsibility is firmly established as one of the Barclays Principal Risks, which means that it is managed within a robust framework of internal control, governance, and risk management processes.

Responsibility for Barclays Corporate Sustainability Strategy rests with the Group Executive Committee, with oversight by the Board. The Group Chief Executive has primary responsibility for embedding corporate sustainability throughout Barclays, supported by the Group Executive Committee. This includes ensuring there are effective processes for identifying and monitoring all the business risks or commercial opportunities that have a significant social, environmental or ethical dimension.

The Brand and Reputation Committee is a sub-committee of Group Executive Committee, and is chaired by Sir Nigel Rudd, Deputy Chairman and a Non-Executive Director on the Board. This Committee’s role is to identify and manage issues that could have a significant impact on Barclays reputation. It met six times during the year and dealt with issues ranging from Barclays presence in Zimbabwe to new areas of commodities business and the fee structure for Barclaycard.

The Community Partnerships Committee, chaired by Gary Hoffman, sets the policy and provides governance for our global community investment programmes, and the Environmental Steering Group gives direction and governancekey to our environmentalfuture prosperity. We undertake this through formal and climate change strategies. The Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) Forum, chairedinformal training and education, including mandatory training required by our Consumer champion, Catharine French, monitors compliance across all retailregulatory bodies and wholesale business units, detailed on-the-job training and development.

UK and non-UK, to embed TCF principles in our relationships with customers. Taking this wider approach to TCF goes significantly beyond our regulatory requirements.employees

    2008  2007a
UK employment statistics    

FTE

  60,700  61,900

Average length of service (years)

  9.2  9.7

Percentage working part time

  16.1%  16.8%

Sickness absence ratec

  3.1%  3.0%

Turnover rate

  19.3%  16.6%

Resignation rate

  12.2%  11.1%
Women in Barclays    

Percentage of all employees

  56.1%  58.0%

Percentage of management grades

  28.0%  28.4%

Percentage of senior executives

  14.6%  13.0%
Ethnic minorities in Barclays    

Percentage of all employees

  12.3%  12.3%

Percentage of management grades

  11.5%  10.0%

Percentage of senior executives

  8.0%  6.6%
Disabled employees in Barclays    

Percentage of all employeesd

  2.0%  3.4%
Age profile    

Employees under 25

  15.5%  16.5%

Employees aged 25-29

  18.5%  17.0%

Employees aged 30-49

  55.8%  54.2%

Employees aged 50+

  10.2%  10.3%
Pensions    

Barclays UK Retirement Fund active members

  58,316  53,473

Current pensioners

  50,499  48,607

 

60

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

  

55


LOGO

Risk

management

  
Risk factors  57
Barclays approach to risk management62
Organisation and structure63
IntroductionKey elements  65
Credit risk management  Barclays approach to risk management6767
Organisation and structure  68
Material risks and control framework70
Capital adequacy70
Model governance73
Credit risk management74
Organisation and structure74
Measurement, reporting and internal ratings  7569
Credit risk mitigation  7873
Analysis of total assets and credit risk exposures75
Monitoring of loansLoans and advances  8076
Debt securities and other bills90
Derivatives  91
Barclays Capital credit market exposures  93
Market risk management  86106
Organisation and structure  86106
Traded market risk  87107
Interest rateNon-traded market risk in the banking book  88109
Other market risks88
Derivatives89
Disclosures about certain trading activities  90110
Liquidity risk management  91111
Organisation and structure111
Key elements  112
Capital risk management  114
Organisation and structure  114
Key elements115
Operational risk management  93117
Organisation and structure  93117
Measurement and capital modelling  93118
Operational risk events  94119
Financial crime risk management  95120
Anti-money laundering and sanctions risk  95120
Fraud risk121
FraudSecurity risk  96121
Security96
Statistical information  97122

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

61


LOGO

Risk management

List of Credit, Market and Operational Risk tables and charts included within the 2007 Annual Report and Accounts

Page
NameRisk
ManagementSupervision and regulation
  Financial
Risk Notes
135

Group Risk Structure

68
Governance Structure at Group Level69
Principal Risks and Other Level 1 Risks70

Risk Appetite Concepts

71

Risk Tendency by Business

78
Loans and Advances by Retail and Wholesale Portfolios80
Loans and Advances to Customers by Industry80
Geographical Analysis of Loans and Advances to Customers80
Analysis of LTV Ratios of Mortgages in UK Home Loan Portfolio (at most recent sanction)80
Loans and Advances, Balances and Limits to Wholesale Customers by Internal Risk Rating (%)81
Credit Exposure to Sub-Investment Grade Countries81
Maturity Analysis of Loans and Advances to Customers (%)81
PPL Balances by Geography82
CRL Balances by Geography82
PPL/Loans and Advances Ratio (%)82
CRL/Loans and Advances Ratio (%)82
Impairment/Provisions coverage of CRLs (%)83
Impairment/Provisions coverage of PCRLs (%)83
Impairment Charges for Bad and Doubtful Debts84
Impairment/Provisions Charges Over Five Years84
Total Write-offs of Impaired Financial Assets85
Market Risk – Business Control Structure87
Barclays Capital’s Trading Revenue88
Movement in Fair Value of Commodity Derivative Positions90
Maturity Analysis of Commodity Derivative Fair Value90
Operational Risk Events > £10k94
Operational Risk Events by Risk Category94
Risk Tendency by Business97
Loans and Advances97
Maturity Analysis of Loans and Advances to Banks98
Interest Rate Sensitivity of Loans and Advances98
Loans and Advances to Customers by Industry98
Loans and Advances to Customers in the UK99
Loans and Advances to Customers in Other EU Countries99
Loans and Advances to Customers in the US100
Loans and Advances to Customers in Africa100
Loans and Advances to Customers in the Rest of the World100
Maturity Analysis of Loans and Advances to Customers101
Loans and Advances to Borrowers in Currencies Other Than the Local Currency of the Borrower for Countries where this exceeds 1% of the Total Group Assets101

Off balance sheet and other Credit Exposure

102
Notional Principal Amounts of Credit Derivatives102
Page
NameRisk
Management
Financial
Risk Notes

Credit Risk Loans Summary

102
Potential Problem Loans Summary104
Interest Foregone on Credit Risk Loans104
Analysis of Impairment/Provision Charges104
Impairment/Provision Charges Loan Loss Ratios105
Analysis of Allowance for Impairment/Provision For Bad and Doubtful Debts105
Allowance for Impairment/Provision Balances Ratios105
Movements in Allowance for Impairment/Provision Charge for Bad and Doubtful Debts106
Amounts Written Off106
Recoveries106
Impairment Allowance/Provisions Charged Against Profit107
Total Impairment/Specific Provision charges for Bad and Doubtful Debts by Industry107
Allowance for Impairment/Specific Provision Charges for Bad and Doubtful Debts by Industry108
Analysis of Amounts Written Off and Recovered by Industry108
Total Impairment Allowance/Provision Coverage of Credit Risk Loans109
Total Impairment Allowance/Provision Coverage of Potential Credit Risk Loans109
Barclays Capital DVaR Summary Table219
Sensitivity Analysis – Impact on Net Interest Income220
Sensitivity Analysis – Impact on Equity220
Concentrations of Interest Rate Risk221
Effective Interest Rate223
Carrying Value of Foreign Currency Net Investment, Borrowing and Derivatives used to hedge them224
Listed and Unlisted Debt Securities and Market Counterparties where external ratings are available227
Wholesale Lending: Default Grades227
Retail Lending: Barclays Retail Grades227
Maximum Exposure to Credit Risk229
Nature of Collateral Obtained or Other Credit Risk Mitigation230
Credit Risk Concentrations by Geographical Sector231
Credit Risk Concentrations by Industrial Sector232
Financial Assets that are Neither Past Due nor Individually Impaired235
Financial Assets that are Past Due but not Individually Impaired237
Impaired Financial Assets238
Impairment Allowance238
Collateral and Other Credit Enhancements Held239
Collateral and Other Credit Enhancements Obtained239
Contractual Maturity of Financial Assets And Liabilities241
Contractual Maturity of Financial Assets on an Undiscounted Basis243

 

6256 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Risk management

Risk factors disclosure

Risk factors

The following information sets forth certain risk factors that the Group believes could cause its actual future results to differ materially from expected results. For further information related to such matters, please refer to page 53 (Barclays Capital credit market positions), pages 65-66 (2007 risk developments), pages 80 to 88 (credit risk management and market risk management), pages 91-95 (liquidity risk management and operational risk management), page 201 (Note 35 – legal proceedings) and page 202 (Note 36 – competition and regulatory matters). However, other factors could also adversely affect the Group results and so the factors discussed in this report should not be considered to be a complete set of all potential risks and uncertainties.

 

Business conditions and general economy

The profitability of Barclays businesses could be adversely affected by athe worsening of general economic conditions in the United Kingdom, globally or in certain individual markets such as the USUnited States, Spain or South Africa. Factors such as interest rates, inflation, investor sentiment, the availability and cost of credit, foreign exchange risk, creditworthiness of counterparties, the liquidity of the global financial markets and the level and volatility of equity prices could significantly affect the Group’s customers’ activity level of customers.levels and financial position. For example:

 

 

Anthe current economic downturn or significantly higher interest rates or continued lack of credit availability to the Group’s customers could adversely affect the credit quality of Barclaysthe Group’s on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet assets by increasing the risk that a greater number of Barclaysthe Group’s customers and counterparties would be unable to meet their obligations.obligations;

 

 

Aa market downturn or further worsening of the economy could cause the Group to incur further mark to market losses in its trading portfolios.portfolios;

 

 

Aa further decline in the value of Sterling relative to other currencies could increase risk weighted assets and therefore the capital requirements of the Group;

a further market downturn could reduce the fees Barclaysthe Group earns for managing assets. For example, a higher level of domestic or foreign interest rates or a downturn in trading markets could affect the flows of assets under management.management; and

 

 

Aa further market downturn would be likely to lead to a decline in the volume of customer transactions that Barclaysthe Group executes for its customers and, therefore, lead to a decline in the income it receives from fees and commissions and interest.

Current market volatility and recent market developments

The global financial system has been experiencing difficulties since August 2007 and financial markets have deteriorated dramatically since the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. Despite measures taken by the United Kingdom and United States governments and the European Central Bank and other central banks to stabilise the financial markets, the volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets have continued. Together with the significant declines in the property markets in the United Kingdom, the United States, Spain and other countries, these events over the past two years have contributed to significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major retail, commercial and investment banks. These write-downs have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions, to be nationalised and, in some cases, to fail. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have substantially reduced and, in some cases, stopped their funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions.

While the capital and credit markets have been experiencing difficulties for some time, the volatility and disruption reached unprecedented levels in the final months of 2008 and economic activity started to contract in many of the economies in which the Group operates. These conditions have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers. The resulting lack of credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business activity could continue to materially and adversely affect the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

57


LOGO

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of suffering financial loss, should any of the Group’s customers, clients or market counterparties fail to fulfil their contractual obligations to the Group. CreditThe credit risk that the Group faces arises mainly from wholesale and retail loans and advances. However, credit risk may also arise where the downgrading of an entity’s credit rating causes the fair value of the Group’s investment in that entity’s financial instruments to fall. The

In a recessionary environment, such as that ongoing in the United Kingdom, the United States and other economies, credit risk that the Group faces arises mainly from commercial and consumer loans and advances, including credit card lending.

increases. Credit risk may also be manifested as country risk where difficulties may arise in the country in which the exposure is domiciled, thus impeding or reducing the value of the asset,assets, or where the counterparty may be the country itself.

Another form of credit risk is settlement risk, which is the possibility that the Group may pay a counterparty – for example, a bank in a foreign exchange transaction – but fail to receive the corresponding settlement in return. The Group is exposed to many different industries and counterparties in the normal course of its business, but its exposure to counterparties in the financial services industry is particularly significant. This exposure can arise through trading, lending, deposit-taking, clearance and settlement and many other activities and relationships. These counterparties include brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds and other institutional clients. Many of these relationships expose the Group to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty and to systemic risk affecting its counterparties. Where the Group holds collateral against counterparty exposures, it may not be able to realise it or liquidate it at prices sufficient to cover the full exposures. Many of the hedging and other risk management strategies utilised by the Group also involve transactions with financial services counterparties. The failure of these counterparties to settle or the perceived weakness of these counterparties may impair the effectiveness of the Group’s hedging and other risk management strategies.

The Group’s credit risk governance structure, management and measurement methodologies, together with an analysis of exposures to credit risk is detailed in the ‘Credit risk management’ section on page 67 and the ‘Credit Risk’ note to the financial statements on page 250.

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

An analysis of Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures is detailed on pages 93 to 105.

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that the Group’s earnings or capital, or its ability to meet business objectives, will be adversely affected by changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices such as interest rates, credit spreads, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign exchange rates. Market risk has increased due to the volatility of the current financial markets.

The main market risk arises from trading activities. The GroupBarclays is also exposed to market risk through non-traded interest rate risk in the banking book and market risk in the pension fund.

The Group’s market risk governance structure, management and measurement methodologies, together with an analysis of exposures to both traded and non-traded market risk is detailed in the ‘Market risk management’ section on page 119 and the ‘Market Risk’ note to the financial statements on page 264. Pension risk is analysed in note 30 on page 220.

The Group’s future earnings could be affected by depressed asset valuations resulting from a deterioration in market conditions. Financial markets are sometimes subject to stress conditions where steep falls in asset values can occur, as demonstrated by recent events affecting asset backed CDOs and the US sub-prime residential mortgage market and which may occur in other asset classes during an economic downturn. Severe market events are difficult to predict and, if they continue to occur, could result in the Group incurring additional losses.

In 2007 and in 2008, the Group recorded material net losses on certain credit market exposures, including ABS CDO Super Senior exposures. As market conditions change, the fair value of these exposures could fall further and result in additional losses or impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s earnings. Such losses or impairment charges could derive from: a decline in the value of exposures; a decline in the ability of counterparties, including monoline insurers, to meet their obligations as they fall due; or the ineffectiveness of hedging and other risk management strategies in circumstances of severe stress.

Liquidity risk

This is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its obligations when they fall due as a result of customer deposits being withdrawn, cash requirements from contractual commitments, or other cash outflows, such as debt maturities. Such outflows would deplete available cash resources for client lending, trading activities and investments. In extreme circumstances, lack of liquidity could result in reductions in balance sheet and sales of assets, or potentially an inability to fulfil lending commitments. This risk is inherent in all banking operations and can be affected by a range of institution-specific and market-wide events including, but not limited to, credit events, merger and acquisition activity, systemic shocks and natural disasters. The Group’s liquidity risk management has several components:

intra-day monitoring to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all settlement obligations;

mismatch limits to control expected cash flows from maturing assets and liabilities;


58

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Risk factors

monitoring of undrawn lending commitments, overdrafts and contingent liabilities; and

diversification of liquidity sources by geography and provider.

During periods of market dislocation, such as those currently ongoing, the Group’s ability to manage liquidity requirements may be impacted by a reduction in the availability of wholesale term funding as well as an increase in the cost of raising wholesale funds. Asset sales, balance sheet reductions and the increasing costs of raising funding will affect the earnings of the Group.

In illiquid markets, the Group may decide to hold assets rather than securitising, syndicating or disposing of them. This could affect the Group’s ability to originate new loans or support other customer transactions as both capital and liquidity are consumed by existing or legacy assets.

The Group’s liquidity risk management and measurement methodologies are detailed in the ‘Liquidity Risk Management’ section on page 111 and the ‘Liquidity Risk’ note to the financial statements on page 268.

Capital risk

Capital risk is the risk that the Group has insufficient capital resources to:

meet minimum regulatory capital requirements in the UK and in other jurisdictions such as the United States and South Africa where regulated activities are undertaken. The Group’s authority to operate as a bank is dependent upon the maintenance of adequate capital resources;

support its credit rating. A weaker credit rating would increase the Group’s cost of funds;

support its growth and strategic options.

During periods of market dislocation, increasing the Group’s capital resources may prove more difficult or costly. Regulators have also recently increased the Group’s capital targets and amended the way in which capital targets are calculated and may further do so in future. This would constrain the Group’s planned activities and contribute to adverse impacts on the Group’s earnings.

The Group’s capital management objectives and processes are detailed in the ‘Capital risk management’ section on page 114.

Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect losses resulting from human factors, external events, and inadequate or failed internal processes and

systems. Operational risks are inherent in Barclaysthe Group’s operations and are typical of any large enterprise. Major sources of operational risk include operational process reliability, IT security, outsourcing of operations, dependence on key suppliers, implementation of strategic change, integration of acquisitions, fraud, human error, customer service quality, regulatory compliance, recruitment, training and retention of staff, and social and environmental impacts.

The Group’s operational risk management and measurement methodologies are detailed in the ‘Operational risk management’ section on page 117.

Financial crime risk

Financial crime risk is a category of operational risk. It arises from the risk that the Group might fail to comply with financial crime legislation and industry laws on anti-money laundering or might suffer losses as a result of internal or external fraud, or might fail to ensure the security of personnel, physical premises and the Group’s assets.

The Group’s financial crime management and processes are detailed in the ‘Financial crime risk management’ section on page 120.

Regulatory compliance risk

Regulatory compliance risk arises from a failure or inability to comply fully with the laws, regulations or codes applicable specifically to the financial service industry. Non-compliance could lead to fines, public reprimands, damage to reputation, enforced suspension of operations or, in extreme cases, withdrawal of authorisations to operate.

In addition, the Group’s businesses and earnings can be affected by the fiscal or other policies and other actions of various governmental and regulatory authorities in the United Kingdom, the European Union (‘EU’), the United States, South Africa and elsewhere. All these are subject to change, particularly in the current market environment where recent developments in the global markets have led to an increase in the involvement of various governmental and regulatory authorities in the financial sector and in the operations of financial institutions. In particular, governmental and regulatory authorities in the United Kingdom, the United States and elsewhere are implementing measures to increase regulatory control in their respective banking sectors, including by imposing enhanced capital requirements or by imposing conditions on direct capital injections and funding. Any future regulatory changes may potentially restrict the Group’s operations, mandate certain lending activity and impose other compliance costs. It is uncertain how the more rigorous regulatory climate will impact financial institutions, including the Group.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 63
 59


LOGOLOGO

 

Capital risk

Capital risk is the risk that the Group has insufficient capital resources to:Areas where changes could have an impact include:

 

 

Meet minimumthe monetary, interest rate and other policies of central banks and regulatory capital requirements in the UK and in other jurisdictions such as the US and South Africa where regulated activities are undertaken. The Group’s authority to operate as a bank is dependent upon the maintenance of adequate capital resources.authorities;

 

 

Support its strong credit rating. In addition to capital resources,general changes in government or regulatory policy that may significantly influence investor decisions in particular markets in which the Group’s rating is supported by a diverse portfolio of activities, an increasingly international presence, consistent profit performance, prudent risk management and a focus on value creation. A weaker credit rating would increase the Group’s cost of funds.Group operates;

 

 

Support its growthgeneral changes in the regulatory requirements, for example, prudential rules relating to the capital adequacy framework and strategic options.rules designed to promote financial stability and increase depositor protection;

changes in competition and pricing environments;

further developments in the financial reporting environment;

differentiation amongst financial institutions by governments with respect to the extension of guarantees to customer deposits and the terms attaching to those guarantees; and

implementation of, or costs related to, local customer or depositor compensation or reimbursement schemes.

Two specific matters that directly impact the Group are the Banking Act 2009 and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme:

Liquidity riskBanking Act 2009

Liquidity riskOn 21st February 2009, the Banking Act 2009 came into force which provides a permanent regime to allow the FSA, the UK Treasury and the Bank of England (the ‘Tripartite Authorities’) to resolve failing banks in the UK. The Banking Act aims to balance the need to protect depositors and prevent systemic failure with the potentially adverse consequences that using powers to deal with those events could have on private law rights, and, as a consequence, wider markets and investor confidence.

These powers, which apply regardless of any contractual restrictions, include: (a) power to issue share transfer orders pursuant to which there may be transferred to a commercial purchaser or Bank of England entity, all or some of the securities issued by a bank; the share transfer order can extend to a wide range of ‘securities’ including shares and bonds issued by a UK Bank (including Barclays Bank PLC) or its holding company (Barclays PLC) and warrants for such; and (b) the power to transfer all or some of the property, rights and liabilities of the UK bank to a purchaser or Bank of England entity. In certain circumstances encumbrances and trusts can be over-reached. Power also exists to over-ride any default provisions in transactions otherwise affected by these powers. Compensation may be payable in the context of both share transfer orders and property appropriation. In the case of share transfer orders any compensation

will be paid to the person who held the security immediately before the transfer, who may not be the encumbrancer.

The Banking Act also vests power in the Bank of England to over-ride, vary or impose contractual obligations between a UK bank or its holding company and its former group undertakings (as defined in the Banking Act), for reasonable consideration, in order to enable any transferee or successor bank of the UK bank to operate effectively. There is also power for the Treasury to amend the law (save for a provision made by or under the Banking Act) by order for the purpose of enabling it to use the special resolution regime powers effectively, potentially with retrospective effect.

Financial Services Compensation Scheme

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (the ‘FSCS’) was created under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and is the risk that the GroupUK’s statutory fund of last resort for customers of authorised financial services firms. The FSCS can pay compensation to customers if a firm is unable, or likely to meet its obligations when they fall due and to replace funds when they are withdrawn, with consequent failure to repay depositors and fulfil commitments to lend. The risk that it will be unable, to do sopay claims against it. The FSCS is inherent in all bankingfunded by levies on authorised UK firms such as Barclays Bank PLC. In the event that the FSCS raises funds from the authorised firms, raises those funds more frequently or significantly increases the levies to be paid by such firms, the associated costs to the Group may have a material impact on the Group’s results of operations and can be impacted by a rangefinancial condition.

Further details of institution-specific and market-wide events including, but not limited to, credit events, merger and acquisition activity, systemic shocks and natural disasters.

Business risk

Business risk is the risk of adverse outcomes resulting from a weak competitive position or from poor choice of strategy, markets, products, activities or structures. Major potential sources of business risk include revenue volatility due to factors such as macroeconomic conditions, inflexible cost structures, uncompetitive products or pricing and structural inefficiencies.

Insurance risk

Insurance risk is the riskspecific matters that impact the Group will haveare included in the ‘Competition and regulatory matters’ note to make higher than anticipated payments to settle claims arising from its long-term and short-term insurance businesses.the financial statements on page 232.

Legal risk

The Group is subject to a comprehensive range of legal obligations in all countries in which it operates. As a result, the Group is exposed to many forms of legal risk, which may arise in a number of ways. Primarily:

 

 

the Group’s business may not be conducted in accordance with applicable laws around the world;

 

 

contractual obligations may either not be enforceable as intended or may be enforced against the Group in an adverse way;

 

 

the intellectual property of the Group (such as its trade names) may not be adequately protected; and

 

 

the Group may be liable for damages to third parties harmed by the conduct of its business.

The Group faces risk where legal proceedings are brought against it. Regardless of whether such claims have merit, the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain and could result in financial loss.


60

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Risk factors

Defending legal proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming and there is no guarantee that all costs incurred will be recovered even if the Group is successful. Although the Group has processes and controls to manage legal risks, failure to manage these risks could impact the Group adversely, both financially and by reputation.

Further details of the Group’s legal proceedings are included in the ‘Legal proceedings’ note to the financial statements on page 231.

Insurance risk

Insurance risk is the risk that the Group will have to make higher than anticipated payments to settle claims arising from its long-term and short-term insurance businesses.

Further details of the Group’s insurance assets and liabilities, including a sensitivity analysis of insurance contract liabilities, are included in the ‘Insurance assets and liabilities’ note to the financial statements on page 213.

Business risk

The Group devotes substantial management and planning resources to the development of strategic plans for organic growth and identification of possible acquisitions, supported by substantial expenditure to generate growth in customer business. If these strategic plans are not delivered as anticipated, the Group’s earnings could grow more slowly or decline. In addition, potential sources of business risk include revenue volatility due to factors such as macroeconomic conditions, inflexible cost structures, uncompetitive products or pricing and structural inefficiencies.

Competition

The global financial services markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive. Innovative competition for corporate, institutional and retail clients and customers comes both from incumbent players and a steady stream of new market entrants, as well as recent consolidation among banking institutions in the United Kingdom, the United States and throughout Europe. The landscape is expected to remain highly competitive in all areas, which could adversely affect the Group’s profitability if the Group fails to retain and attract clients and customers.

Tax risk

The Group is subject to the tax laws in all countries in which it operates.operates, including tax laws adopted at an EU level. A number of double taxation agreements entered between two countries also impact on the taxation of the Group. The Group is also subject to European Union tax law. Tax risk is the risk associated with changes in tax law or in the interpretation of tax law. It also includes the risk of changes in tax rates and the risk of failure to comply with procedures required by tax authorities. Failure to manage tax risks could lead to an additional tax charge. It could also lead to a financial penalty for failure to comply with required tax procedures or other aspects of tax law. If, as a result of a particular tax risk materialising, the tax costs associated with particular transactions are greater than anticipated, it could affect the profitability of those transactions.

The Group takes a responsible and transparent approach to the management and control of its tax affairs and related tax risk:

 

 

tax risks are assessed as part of the Group’s formal governance processes and are reviewed by the Executive Committee, Group Finance Director and the Board Risk Committee;

 

 

the tax charge is also reviewed by the Board Audit Committee;

 

 

the tax risks of proposed transactions or new areas of business are fully considered before proceeding;

 

 

the Group takes appropriate advice from reputable professional firms;

 

 

the Group employs high-quality tax professionals and provides ongoing technical training;

 

 

the tax professionals understand and work closely with the different areas of the business;

 

 

the Group uses effective, well-documented and controlled processes to ensure compliance with tax disclosure and filing obligations; and

 

 

where disputes arise with tax authorities with regard to the interpretation and application of tax law, the Group is committed to addressing the matter promptly and resolving the matter with the tax authority in an open and constructive manner.

Effect of governmental policy and regulation

The Group’s businesses and earnings can be affected by the fiscal or other policies and other actions of various governmental and regulatory authorities in the UK, the European Union, the US, South Africa and elsewhere.

Areas where changes could have an impact include:

the monetary, interest rate and other policies of central banks and regulatory authorities;

general changes in government or regulatory policy that may significantly influence investor decisions in particular markets in which the Group operates;

general changes in the regulatory requirements, for example, prudential rules relating to the capital adequacy framework (page 70) and rules designed to promote financial stability and increase depositor protection;

changes and rules in competition and pricing environments;

further developments in the financial reporting environment;

expropriation, nationalisation, confiscation of assets and changes in legislation relating to foreign ownership; and

other unfavourable political, military or diplomatic developments producing social instability or legal uncertainty which in turn may affect demand for the Group’s products and services.

Regulatory compliance risk

Regulatory compliance risk arises from a failure or inability to comply fully with the laws, regulations or codes applicable specifically to the financial services industry. Non compliance could lead to fines, public reprimands, damage to reputation, enforced suspension of operations or, in extreme cases, withdrawal of authorisations to operate.

Impact of strategic decisions taken by the Group

The Group devotes substantial management and planning resources to the development of strategic plans for organic growth and identification of possible acquisitions, supported by substantial expenditure to generate growth in customer business. If these strategic plans do not deliver as anticipated, the Group’s earnings could grow more slowly or decline.

Competition

The global financial services markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive. Innovative competition for corporate, institutional and retail clients and customers comes both from incumbent players and a steady stream of new market entrants. The landscape is expected to remain highly competitive in all areas, which could adversely affect the Group’s profitability if the Group fails to retain and attract clients and customers.


 

64 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 61


LOGO

Risk management

RiskBarclays approach to risk management

Introduction

This risk section outlines Barclays approach to risk management, explaining our objectives as well asexemplified by the high level policies,application of the Group’s Principal Risks Policy, determination of its Risk Appetite and governance around its Risk Methodologies, which cover its processes, measurement techniques and controls that are used. This also presents ourcontrols. In addition, we set out summary information and disclosure on our portfolios and positions. Consequent to the adoption of IFRS 7, some of our risk disclosure is moved from this section to the financial statements section of this report, as described in our list of tables on page 62.

2007 Developments

Wholesale credit risk

The results of severe disruption in the US sub-prime mortgage market were felt across many wholesale credit markets in the second half of 2007, and were reflected in wider credit spreads, higher volatility, tight liquidity in interbank and commercial paper markets, more constrained debt issuance and lower investor risk appetite. Although impairment and other credit provisions in Barclays Capital rose as a consequence of these difficult sub-prime market conditions, our risks in these portfolios were identified in the first half and management actions were taken to reduce limits and positions. Further reductions and increased hedging through the rest of the year continued to bring net positions down and limited the financial effect of the significant decline in market conditions. Our ABS CDO Super Senior positions were reduced during the year and our remaining exposure reflected netting against writedowns, hedges, and subordination. At the end of the year, market conditions remained difficult with reduced liquidity in cash and securitised products, and reflected stress at some counterparties such as the monoline insurers.

The international markets for Leveraged Finance were also disrupted in 2007. The level of underwritten positions was steady during the second half, with some small turnover in the portfolio. The vast majority of positions held were senior tranches. Liquidity conditions at year end remained constrained.

The Group’s wholesale credit risk profile in 2007 benefited from the diversification available from the UK and international portfolios, which grew by 14% and 41% respectively. The corporate credit risk profile remained steady, with corporate credit ratings and watch list balances broadly stable.

At Barclays Commercial Bank there was good growth in loans and advances. The risk profile of the Larger Business portfolio remained stable as early warning list balances, default rates and loan loss rates were steady. There was no increase to exposure levels to leveraged finance during 2007 and limits were reduced.

Wholesale credit portfolio performance was steady in South Africa, particularly for Absa’s most significant wholesale portfolios – agriculture, property and sovereign lending – which were relatively unaffected during 2007 by interest rate rises compared with consumer-facing sectors and retail portfolios. Relatively good performance in these sectors in 2007 was reflected in a reduction in Absa’s wholesale impairment charge. After many years of positive economic conditions in South Africa, the wholsesale portfolios will be under more stress in current market conditions.

Loan loss rates across the Western Europe and Emerging Markets wholesale businesses were stable in 2007. The Group continued to invest in risk management infrastructure to support these businesses’ growth initiatives in Dubai, India, Egypt and Italy.

Going into 2008, the credit environment reflects concern about weakening economic conditions in our major markets. Credit spreads and other indicators signal that the credit cycle has changed after a long period of stability. We expect some deterioration in credit metrics as default probabilities move toward their medium-term averages. This environment has led to a more cautious approach to credit assessment, pricing and ongoing control in the financial industry, which we believe will continue through the year.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

65


LOGO

Retail credit risk

A continued improvement in credit quality in the UK unsecured portfolios was a principal feature of the Group’s retail credit risk profile during 2007. Barclaycard continued the underwriting revisions begun in 2006 in UK credit cards, and successfully reduced impairment in the main Barclays branded cards portfolio. Flows into delinquency and arrears balances fell, as did general charge-offs, which were helped by a fall in charge-offs due to bankruptcy. New customer quality increased again in 2007, reflected in a sustained improvement in average approval scores and a fall in early cycle delinquency rates.

The UK unsecured loans portfolio, which is now managed within UK Retail Banking, saw reduced early and late cycle delinquency resulting from revised underwriting criteria. Improved collections processes helped to reduce impairment in Local Business, while in UK Home Finance, delinquency and possession rates remained at the lows recorded since 2004, and impairment charges were negligible. Barclays delinquency and possession rates remain below industry averages, reflecting the high credit quality of the portfolio.

Lending criteria in Absa’s retail portfolios were tightened in response to a more difficult credit environment, signalled by a rise in arrears rates. The change in conditions was primarily driven by a prolonged series of interest rate rises and the implementation of new consumer lending legislation in June 2007.

We increased our investment in credit risk infrastructure in India and Italy to support the launch or expansion of retail banking operations in those countries during 2007. Barclays has also established a credit risk modelling centre in Madrid to support our strategic growth objectives in the Western Europe business.

The US card business continued to grow, and the underwriting and account management criteria were adjusted as the US retail environment weakened during the year.

Looking ahead this year, we expect the retail credit environment to be more challenging in Absa and to some degree in the US portfolio. The UK portfolios’ performance, which has improved in the past two years, will be subject to the evolving economic climate anticipated in 2008.

Risk tendency

Risk tendency at 2007 year-end reflected an increase in portfolio size as well as some weakening in credit grades, evidenced by wider spreads in wholesale credit and potentially more difficult conditions in some of the international retail portfolios in 2008.

Country risk

The portfolio is reasonably well diversified, assisted by increases in business levels in a range of European, African and Asian countries.

Market risk

Dislocation in the credit markets had an impact on all major interest rate, equity and foreign exchange markets, which also experienced higher volatility, particularly in the second half. Barclays Capital’s market risk exposure, as measured by average total Daily Value at Risk (DVaR), increased 13% to an average of £42m in 2007. Over the same period, average daily market risk revenue increased 19% to £26m, satisfying our objective that trading revenues should grow at or above the rate of increase in risk levels. The average DVaR on interest rate and credit spread exposures was broadly unchanged, with increasing volatility in credit spreads offset by reduced positions held in the credit markets.

This reduction in exposure resulted in a lower level of credit stress loss, which is another important market risk control for Barclays Capital. Average commodity DVaR and equity DVaR increased as those businesses grew. Diversification across risk types remaining significant, reflecting the broad product mix. Higher market volatilities in the fourth quarter led to an increase in DVaR at year end, and will contribute to higher average DVaRs in 2008.

Liquidity risk

Bank funding markets and general liquidity in credit markets came under pressure in 2007. In the second half, some money market participants faced difficulties in obtaining funding beyond one week, and term LIBOR premiums rose despite the helpful provision of liquidity by central banks. The cost of longer-term bank funding and capital also increased, and funding channels such as securitisation and covered bond issuance became significantly constrained. Despite these developments, the Group’s liquidity position remained strong due to its deep retail funding base, its diversity of institutional funding sources across tenors, counterparties and geographies and its limited reliance on securitisation as a funding source.

Operational risk

In 2007, Barclays embedded the advanced measurement approach (AMA) to operational risk across the Group, having received AMA approval from the FSA and the SARB. Barclays now allocates operational risk economic capital by business, providing operational insight and greater tangible incentives to the Group’s businesses to further improve the management of their operational risk profiles. As a percentage of revenues, operational risk events fell in 2007.

Financial crime

The Group introduced two-factor authentication for online transactions through its PINsentry device and continued to offer all UK personal customers anti-phishing software to combat internet fraud. Combined with improvements in transaction profiling, these changes enabled us to reduce net reported fraud losses. The threat from financial crime constantly evolves, however, and Barclays will continue to build the capacity to respond rapidly to emerging issues as well as to invest in strategic improvements in transaction channel security.

Basel II and capital management

New capital adequacy rules came into force in the UK from 1st January 2008, following the implementation of the Basel II banking accord. Barclays regulatory capital requirement will now more closely reflect the risk profile as measured by its own risk measurement systems (an approach termed the Advanced Internal Ratings Based approach or AIRB).

Permission from the FSA to apply the AIRB approach to capital calculations was the culmination of a lengthy and detailed programme of work across all business areas and covering all risk types. As part of the application process, Barclays assessed over 200 models to ensure that they were consistent with regulators’ standards and that they met the ‘use’ test, which assesses a model’s fitness as an input to capital calculations by the extent to which management make use of its output in business decisions.

Our focus over the coming years will be to further enhance risk models, processes and systems infrastructure, in line with our ambition to remain at the leading edge of risk management. With the most significant portfolios already consistent with the AIRB approach, the focus of our Basel II work will now be to progress the roll-out of the advanced approach for the remaining minority of our portfolios. In line with the schedule agreed with regulators, we will complete this process by 2011.


66

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

Barclays approach to risk management involves a number of fundamental elements that drive our processes across the Group:

The Group’sRisk appetite sets out the level of risk that the Bank is willing to take in pursuit of its business objectives. This is expressed as the Group’s appetite for earnings volatility across all businesses from credit, market, and operational risk. It is calibrated against our broad financial targets, including income and impairment targets, dividend coverage and capital levels. It is prepared each year as part of the Group’s Medium Term Planning process, and combines a top-down view of the Bank’s risk capacity with a bottom-up view of the risk profile requested and recommended by each business. This entails making business plan adjustments as necessary to ensure that our Medium Term Plan creates a risk profile that meets our Risk Appetite (page 71).

ThePrincipal risk policyRisks Policy covers the Group’s main risk types, assigning responsibility for the management of specific risks, and setting out the requirements for control frameworks for all of the risk types. The individual control frameworks are reinforced by a robust system of review and challenge, and a governance process of aggregation and broad review by businesses and risk across the Group (page 68)65).

The Group’sRisk Appetite sets out the level of risk that the Board is willing to take in pursuit of its business objectives. This is expressed as the Group’s appetite for earnings volatility across all businesses from credit, market, and operational risk. It is calibrated against our broad financial targets, including income and impairment targets, dividend coverage and capital levels. It is prepared each year as part of the Group’s Medium-Term Planning process, and combines a top-down view of the Group’s risk capacity with a bottom-up view of the risk profile requested and recommended by each business. This entails making business plan adjustments as necessary to ensure that our Medium-Term Plan creates a risk profile that meets our Risk Appetite (page 65).

BarclaysRisk methodologiesMethodologies include systems that enable the Group to measure, aggregate and report risk for internal and regulatory purposes. As an example, our credit grading models produce Internal Ratings through internally derived estimates of default probabilities. These measurements are used by management in an extensive range of decisions, from credit grading, pricing and approval to portfolio management, economic capital allocation and capital adequacy processes (page 70)66).

Risk management is a fundamental part of Barclays business activity and an essential component of its planning process. To keep risk management at the centre of the executive agenda, it is embedded in the everyday management of the business.

Barclays ensures that it has the functional capacity to manage the risk in new and existing businesses. At a strategic level, our risk management objectives are:

 

 

To identify the Group’s material risks and ensure that business profile and plans are consistent with risk appetite.

 

 

To optimise risk/return decisions by taking them as closely as possible to the business, while establishing strong and independent review and challenge structures.

 

 

To ensure that business growth plans are properly supported by effective risk infrastructure.

 

 

To manage risk profile to ensure that specific financial deliverables remain possible under a range of adverse business conditions.

 

 

To help executives improve the control and coordinationco-ordination of risk taking across the business.

In pursuit of these objectives, Group Risk breaks down risk management into five discrete processes: direct, assess, control, report, and manage/challenge (see panel below).

 

Process  

StrategyActivity

Direct  

–  Understand the principal risks to achieving Group strategy.

–  Establish Risk Appetite.

–  Establish and communicate the risk management framework including responsibilities, authorities and key controls.

Assess  

–  Establish the process for identifying and analysing business-level risks.

–  Agree and implement measurement and reporting standards and methodologies.

Control  

–  Establish key control processes and practices, including limit structures, impairment allowance criteria and reporting requirements.

–  Monitor the operation of the controls and adherence to risk direction and limits.

–  Provide early warning of control or appetite breaches.

–  Ensure that risk management practices and conditions are appropriate for the business environment.

Report  

–  Interpret and report on risk exposures, concentrations and risk-taking outcomes.

–  Interpret and report on sensitivities and Key Risk Indicators.

–  Communicate with external parties.

Manage
and
Challenge

Challenge

  

–  Review and challenge all aspects of the Group’s risk profile.

–  Assess new risk-return opportunities.

–  Advise on optimising the Group’s risk profile.

–  Review and challenge risk management practices.


 

62

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

67


LOGORisk management

Barclays approach to risk management

Organisation and structure

Responsibility for risk management resides at all levels within the Group, from the Executive down through the organisation to each business manager and risk specialist. Barclays distributes these responsibilities so that risk/return decisions are taken at the most appropriate level; as close as possible to the business, and subject to robust and effective review and challenge.

Every business manager is accountable for managing risk in his or her business area; they must understand and control the key risks inherent in the business undertaken. Each business area also employs risk specialists to provide an independent control function and to support the development of a strong risk management environment. This functional approach to risk management is built on formal control processes that rely on individual responsibility and independent oversight, as well as challenge through peer reviews.

The Board approves Risk Appetite and the Board Risk Committee monitors the Group’s risk profile against this agreed appetite.

Business Heads are responsible for the identification and management of risk in their businesses.

The Group Risk Director, under delegated authority from the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, has responsibility for ensuring effective risk management and control.

 

Risk-Type Heads exist at Group-level for the main risk types, and report to the Risk Director. Along with their teams, they are responsible for establishing a risk control framework and risk oversight.

Each business has an embedded risk management team reporting to a Business Risk Director or Chief Credit Officer who reports to the Risk Director. The risk management teams assist Group Risk in the formulation of Group Risk policy and its implementation across the businesses.

Business risk teams, each under the management of a Business Risk Director, are responsible for assisting Business Heads in the identification and management of their business risk profiles and for implementing appropriate controls. The functional coverage of risk responsibilities is illustrated in the diagram below.

Internal Audit is responsible for the independent review of risk management and the control environment.

To support expanded risk taking, Barclays has continued to strengthen the independent and specialised risk teams in each of its businesses, supported by matching teams at Group level, acting in both a consultancy and oversight capacity. As a prerequisite to business growth plans, it has made the recruitment, development and retention of risk professionals a priority.


LOGO

68

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

The Committees shown below receive regular and comprehensive reports. The Board Risk Committee receives a quarterly report covering allreports on the Group’s risk profile and forward risk trends (for further information on the membership and activities of our principal risks.the Board Risk Committee, see page 152). The Board Audit Committee receives quarterly reports on control issues of significance and half-yearly impairment allowances and regulatory reports. See page 163 for additional details on the membership and activities of the Board Audit Committee. Both Board and Audit Committees also receive reports dealing in more depth with specific issues relevant at the time. The proceedings of both Committees are reported to the full Board, which also receives a concise quarterly risk report. Internal Audit supports both

Committees by attendance and/or the provision of quarterly reports resulting from its work on governance, risk and control issues of significance. The Board Audit Committee reviews and approves Internal Audit’s plans and resources, and evaluates the effectiveness of Internal Audit.

An assessment by external advisers is also carried out periodically.

In addition to the Committees shown in the chart, there is a Brand and Reputation Committee reviewing emerging issues with potentially significant reputational impact.


 

Governance structure at Group level

LOGOLOGO

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 69
 63


LOGOLOGO

The Group Risk Director has overall day to day accountability for risk management. Reporting to the Group Risk Director are Group Risk Heads for Retail Credit Risk, Wholesale Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Financial Crime Risk and Capital Demand. Along with their teams, they are responsible for establishing a risk control framework and risk oversight at Group level. This core team liaises with each business as part of the monitoring and management processes.

Each business has an embedded risk management team reporting to a Business Risk Director who reports to the Group Risk Director. The risk management teams assist Group Risk in the formulation of Group Risk policy and its implementation across the businesses.

Business risk teams are responsible for assisting Business Heads in the identification and management of their business risk profiles and for implementing appropriate controls. The functional coverage of risk responsibilities is illustrated in the diagram below.

Internal Audit is responsible for the independent review of risk management and the control environment.

To support risk taking, Barclays has continued to strengthen the independent and specialised risk teams in each of its businesses, supported by matching teams at Group level, acting in both a consultancy and oversight capacity. As a prerequisite to business growth plans, it has made the recruitment, development and retention of risk professionals a priority.


LOGO

64

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

Key elements

 

Material risks and control frameworkPrincipal Risks

As well as overall responsibility for the Group’s risk exposure versus appetite, theThe Board is also responsible for the Group Internal Control and Assurance Framework (‘GICAF’). As part of the GICAF, it approves the Principal Risks Policy, which sets out responsibilities for the management of the Group’s most significant risk exposures. The Board oversees the operating effectiveness of the Principal Risks Policy through the regular review of reports on the Group’s material risk exposures and controls.

The Group’s risk categorisation comprises 17 risk categories (‘Level 1’), thirteen13 of which are known as Principal Risks. Each Principal Risk is owned by a senior individual at the Group level, who liaises with Principal Risk owners within Business Units and Central Support Units.Group Centre Functions. The 17 risk categories are shown in the panel below.

Each Group Principal Risk Owner (‘GPRO’) is responsible for setting minimum control requirements for their risk and for overseeing the risk and control performance across the Group. Group control requirements (e.g. Group Policies/Processes/Committee oversight) for each of these risks are defined, in consultation with Business Units, and communicated and maintained by the GPRO.

Implementation of the control requirements for each Principal Risk provides each Business Unit or Central Support UnitGroup Centre Function with the foundation of its system of internal control for that particular risk. This will usually be built upon in more detail, according to the circumstances of each Business Unit, to provide a complete and appropriate system of internal control.

The specific controls for individual Principal Risks are supplemented by generic risk management requirements. These requirements are articulated as the Group’s Operational Risk Management Framework (see page 93)117) and include policies on:

 

 

Internal Risk Event Identification and Reporting

 

 

Detailed Risk and Control Assessment

 

 

Key Indicators

 

 

Key Risk Scenarios

Business Unit and Central Support UnitGroup Centre Function Heads are responsible for maintaining ongoing assurance that the controls they have put in place to manage the risks to their business objectives are operating effectively. They are required to undertake a formal six-monthly review of assurance information. These reviews support the regulatory requirement for the Group to make a statement about its system of internal control (the ‘Turnbull’ statement), in the annual reportAnnual Report and accounts.Accounts.

Principal Risks

Other Level 1 Risks
Retail CreditStrategic
Wholesale CreditChange
MarketCorporate Responsibility
CapitalBrand Management
Liquidity
Financial Crime
Operations
Technology
People
Regulatory
Financial Reporting
Legal
Taxation

Capital adequacy

In order to maximise shareholder value through optimising both the level and mix of capital resources, Barclays operates a centralised capital management model, considering both regulatory and economic capital. Decisions on the allocation of capital resources, conducted as part of the strategic planning review, are based on a number of factors including returns on economic and regulatory capital.

The Group’s capital management objectives are to:

Support the Group’s AA credit rating.

Maintain sufficient capital resources to support the Group’s risk appetite and economic capital requirements.

Maintain sufficient capital resources to meet the FSA’s minimum regulatory capital requirements and the US Federal Reserve Bank’s requirements that a financial holding company be well capitalised.

Ensure locally regulated subsidiaries can meet their minimum capital requirements.

Treasury Committee manages compliance with the Group’s capital management objectives. The Committee reviews actual and forecast capital demand and resources on a monthly basis.

The processes in place for delivering the Group’s capital management objectives include:

Establishment of internal targets for capital demand and ratios

Ensuring local entity regulatory capital adequacy

Annual Risk Appetite setting

Review of the Group’ strategic medium-term plan

Economic capital management

Stress testing

Managing capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange rate movements

Internal targets

To support its capital management objectives, the Group sets internal targets for its key capital ratios. The internal targets exceed minimum capital requirements to take into account:

Possible volatility in the anticipated demand for capital caused by accessing new business opportunities, including mergers and acquisitions, by unanticipated drawdown of committed facilities or by deterioration in the credit quality of the Group’s assets

Possible volatility of reported profits and other capital resources compared with forecast

Capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange rate movements

A need for flexibility in debt capital issuance and securitisation plans


70

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

Local entity regulatory capital adequacy

The Group manages its capital resources to ensure that those Group entities that are subject to local capital adequacy regulation in individual jurisdictions meet their minimum capital requirements. Local management manages compliance with subsidiary entity minimum regulatory capital requirements with reporting to local Asset and Liability Committees and to Treasury Committee, as required.

Injections of capital resources into Group subsidiary entities are controlled under authorities delegated from the Group Executive Committee. The Group’s policy is for profits generated in subsidiary entities to be repatriated to Barclays Bank PLC in the form of dividends.

Annual risk appetite settingAppetite

Risk Appetite is the level of risk the Board of Barclays chooses to take in pursuit of its strategic objectives, recognising a range of possible outcomes as business plans are implemented. Barclays framework, approved by the Board Risk Committee, combines a top-down view of its capacity to take risk with a bottom-up view of the business risk profile requested and recommended by each business area.

To determine this acceptable level of risk, management estimates the potential earnings volatility from different businesses under various scenarios.

This annual setting of Risk Appetite considers the bank’sBank’s ability to support business growth, desired dividend payout levels and capital ratio targets. If the projections entail too high a level of risk, management will challenge each area to find new ways to rebalance the business mix to incur less risk on a diversified basis. Performance against Risk Appetite is measured and reported to the Executive and Board regularly throughout the year.

Barclays believes that this framework enables it to:

 

 

Improve risk and return characteristics across the business

 

 

Help meetMeet growth targets within an overall risk appetite and protect the Group’s performance

 

 

Improve management confidence and debate regarding our risk profile

 

 

Improve executive management control and co-ordination of risk-taking across businesses

 

 

EnableIdentify unused risk capacity, to be identified and thus highlight profitable opportunities to be highlighted.opportunities.

The Risk Appetite framework considers credit, market and operational risk and is applied using two perspectives: ‘financial volatility’ and ‘mandate and scale’.

LOGO

Financial Volatility is the level of potential deviation from expected financial performance that Barclays is prepared to sustain at relevant points on the risk profile. It is established with reference to the strategic objectives and to the business plans of the Group, including the achievement of annual financial targets, payment of dividends, funding of capital growth and maintenance of acceptable capital ratios and our credit rating.

The portfolio is analysed in this way at four representative levels:

 

 

Expected performance (including the average credit losses based on measurements over many years)

 

 

A level of loss that corresponds to moderate increases in market, credit or operational risk from expected levels

 

 

A more severe level of loss which is much less likely

 

 

An extreme but highly improbable level of loss which is used to determine the Group’s economic capitalcapital.

These potentially larger but increasingly less likely levels of loss are illustrated in the Risk Appetite concepts chart below.

TheMandate and Scale framework is a formal review and control of our business activities to ensure that they are within our mandate (i.e. aligned to the expectations of external stakeholders) and are of an appropriate scale (relative to the risk and reward of the underlying activities). Appropriate assurance is achieved by using limits and triggers to avoid concentrations and operational risks which could lead to unexpected losses of a scale that would result in a disproportionate fall in Barclays market capitalisation.

Taken as a whole, the Risk Appetite framework provides a basis for the allocation of risk capacity to each business. Since the level of loss at any given probability is dependent on the portfolio of exposures in each business, the statistical measurement for each key risk category gives the Group clearer sight and better control of risk-taking throughout the enterprise.


Review of the Group’s strategic medium-term plan

LOGO

Capital adequacy forms a critical part of the Group’s annual strategic medium-term planning process. During the planning process, the Group sets limits for business capital demand to ensure the capital management objectives including meeting internal targets will continue to be met over the medium-term period. Treasury Committee reviews the limits on a monthly basis.

LOGO


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 71
 65


LOGOLOGO

 

AchievingRisk Methodologies

Fundamental to the planned performance in each business is dependent upon the abilitydelivery of the businessGroup’s risk management objectives are a series of risk methodologies that allow it to direct, assess, control,measure, model, price, stress, aggregate, report and manage and challengemitigate the risks in the business accurately. Group Risk supports the planning process by providing robust review and challengethat arise from its activities. Many of the business plansmost important processes relate to ensure that:

The figures relating to risk are internally consistent and accurate

The plans are achievable given the risk management capabilities of the businesses

The plans efficiently utilise, but do not exceed, the Group’s risk appetite.

This reviewthe internal ratings used in granting credit and challenge is achievedare discussed separately on page 82. The specific methodologies used to manage market risk, liquidity risk, capital risk and operational risk are also discussed in their corresponding sections. At a more general level, the Group’s approach to risk management can be illustrated through Risk Executive Dialogues involving among others, the Group Risk Directorits use of stress testing and the business risk directors.

Economic capital management

Economic capital is an internal measure of the minimum equity and preference capital required for the Group to maintain its credit rating based upon its risk profile.

Barclays assesses economic capital requirements by measuring the Group risk profile using both internally and externally developed models. The Group assigns economic capital primarily within the following risks: Credit Risk, Market Risk, Business Risk, Operational Risk, Insurance Risk, Fixed Assets and Private Equity. Group Risk owns the methodology and policy for economic capital while the businesses are primarily responsible for the calculation.

The Group regularly enhances its economic capital methodology and benchmarks outputs to external reference points. The framework reflects default probabilities during average credit conditions, rather than those prevailing at the balance sheet date, thus removing cyclicality from the economic capital calculation. Economic capital for wholesale credit risk includes counterparty credit risk arising as a result of credit risk on traded market exposures. The framework also adjusts economic capital to reflect time horizon, correlation of risks and risk concentrations.

Economic capital is allocated on a consistent basis across all of Barclays businesses and risk activities. A single cost of equity is applied to calculate the cost of risk. Economic capital allocations reflect varying levels of risk.

The total average economic capital required by the Group, as determined by risk assessment models and after considering the Group’s estimated portfolio effects, is compared with the average supply of capital resources to evaluate economic capital utilisation.

The Group’s economic capital calculations form the basis of its Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (‘ICAAP’) submission to the FSA under Pillar 2 of Basel II.controls around model governance.

Stress testing

As part of the annual stress testing process, Barclays estimates the impact of a severe economic downturn on the projected demand and supply of capital. This process enables the Group to assess whether it

could meet its minimum regulatory capital requirements throughout a severe recession.

The Risk Appetite numbers are validated by estimating the Group sensitivity to adverse changes in the business environment and to include operational events that impact the Group as a whole using stress testing and scenario analysis. For instance, changes in certain macroeconomic variables represent environmental stresses which may reveal systemic credit and market risk sensitivities in our retail and wholesale portfolios.

The recession scenarios considered incorporate changes in macroeconomic variables, including:

 

 

Weaker GDP, employment or property prices

 

 

Higher interest rates

Lower equity prices

 

 

Interest rate curve shifts

Commodity price movements

Such Group-wide stress tests allow senior management to gain a better understanding of how portfolios are likely to react to changing economic and geopolitical conditions and how the Group can best prepare for and react to them. The stress test simulates the balance sheet and profit and loss effects of stresses across the Group, investigating the impact on profits and the ability to maintain appropriate capital ratios. Insights gained are fully integrated into the senior management process and the Risk Appetite framework. This process of analysis and senior management oversight also provides the basis for fulfilling the stress testing requirements of Basel II.

Group-wide stress testing is only one of a number of stress test analyses that are performed as part of the wider risk management process. Specific stress test analysis is used across all risk types to gain a better understanding of the risk profile and the potential effects of changes in external factors. These stress tests are performed at a range of different levels, from analysis covering specific stresses on individual sub-portfolios (e.g. high value mortgages in the South East of England), to portfolio level stresses (e.g. the overall commodities portfolio).

Managing capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange rate movements

The Group’s regulatory capital ratios are sensitive to foreign exchange movements in reserves, goodwill, minority interests and other non Sterling debt capital as well as non Sterling risk weighted assets. For material currencies, the Group seeks to hold capital in currencies to match the risk weighted assets transacted in those currencies, in the same proportion as the Group capital ratio targets, also taking into account the impact of hedging net investments.


72

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

higher unemployment on the US cards portfolio) to regularly assessed stress scenarios (such as the effect of a sudden rise in global interest rates on Barclays Capital’s market exposures).


LOGO

Model governanceGovernance

Barclays has a large number of models in place across the Group, covering all risk types. To minimise the risk of loss through model failure, a Group Policy for the Control of Model Risk Policy (GMRP) has been developed. This has been extensively reviewed and enhanced during the course of 2008.

The PolicyGMRP helps reduce the potential for model failure by setting minimum standards around the end-to-end model development and implementation process. The Policy also sets the Group governance processes for all

models, which allows model risk to be monitored, across the Group, and seeks to identify and escalate any potential problems at an early stage.

To help ensure that sufficient management time is spent on the more material models, each model is provided with a materiality rating. Group Model Risk PolicyGMRP defines the materiality ranges for all model types. The materiality ranges are based on an assessment of the impact to the Group in the event of a model error. The materiality affects the approval and reporting level for each model, with the most material models being approved by the Executive Models Committee, a technical sub-committee of Group Executive Committee (ExCo).

TheCommittee. Although final level of model sign-off will vary, depending on model materiality, the standards of model build, implementation, monitoring and maintenance do not change with the materiality level.

Documentation must be sufficiently detailed, to allow an expert to recreate theunderstand all appropriate aspects of model from the original data sources.development. It must include a description of the data used for model development, the methodology used (and the rationale for choosing such a methodology), a description of any assumptions used in the model, andmade, as well as details of where the model works well and areas that are known model weaknesses.

All models are subject to a validation and independent review process before the model can be signed-off for implementation. The model validation exercise must demonstrate that the model is fit for purpose and provides accurate estimates. The independent review process will also ensure that all aspects of the model development process have been performed in a suitable manner.

The initial sign-off process ensures that the model is technically fit for purpose as well as ensuring that the model satisfies the business requirements and all the relevant regulatory requirements. The rulesAs detailed above, the process for model sign-off areis based on materiality, with all of a business unit’s models at least initially being approved in business-led committees, and Group involvement increasing as the models become more material. The most material models receive their ultimate sign-off for implementation from Group ExCo.

AllOnce implemented, all models within the Group are subject to an annual review,validation, to ensure that the modelsthey are performing as expected, and that assumptions used in model development are still appropriate. In additionalline with initial sign-off requirements, annual validations are also formally reviewed at the appropriate technical committee.

In addition to annual review, manyvalidation, models are subject to more frequentquarterly performance monitoring. Model performance monitoring ensures that deficiencies in models are identified early, and that remedial action can be taken before the deficiency becomes serious and affectsenough to affect the decision-making process. As part of this process, model owners set performance triggers and define appropriate actions for their models in the event of breaches.

Externally developed models are subject to the same governance standards as internal models, and must be initially approved for use following athe validation and independent review process. External models are also subject to the same standards for ongoing monitoring and annual validation requirements.

Within Barclays Capital, where models are used to value positions within the trading book the positions are subject to regular independent price testing which covers all trading positions. Prices are compared to direct external market data where possible. When this is not possible, more analytic techniques are used, such as industry consensus pricing services. These services enable Barclays to anonymously compare structured products and model-input parameters with those of other banks engaged in the trading of the same financial products. The conclusions and any exceptions to this exercise are communicated to senior levels of business and infrastructure management.


 

66

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

73


Risk management

Credit risk management

Credit risk management

Credit risk is the risk of suffering financial loss should any of the Group’s customers, clients or market counterparties fail to fulfil their contractual obligations to the Group. Credit risk may also arise where the downgrading of an entity’s credit rating causes the fair value of the Group’s investment in that entity’s financial instruments to fall. The credit risk that the Group faces arises mainly from commercial and consumer loans and advances, including credit card lending.

 

The granting of credit is one of the Group’s major sources of income and, as its most significant risk, the Group dedicates considerable resources to controlling it. The importance of credit risk is illustrated by noting that almost two-thirds of risk-based economic capital is allocated to credit risk. Credit exposures arise principally inThe credit risk that the Group faces arises mainly from wholesale and retail loans and advances.

Barclays is also exposed to other credit risks arising from its trading activities, including debt securities, derivatives, settlement balances with market counterparties and reverse repurchase loans.

In managing credit risk, the Group applies the five-step risk management process and internal control framework described previously (page 67).

framework. Specific credit risk management objectives are:

 

 

To gain a clear and accurate understanding and assessment of credit risk across the business, from the level of individual facilities up to the total portfolio.

 

 

To control and plan the taking of credit risk, ensuring it is coherently priced across the business and avoiding undesirable concentrations.

 

 

To support strategic growth and decision-making based on sound credit risk management principles and a pro-activeproactive approach to identifying and measuring new risks.

 

 

To ensure a robust framework for the creation, use and ongoing monitoring of the Group’s credit risk measurement models.

 

 

To ensure that our balance sheet correctly reflects the value of our assets in accordance with accounting principles.

In the review of Barclays credit risk management that follows, we first explain how the Group meets its credit risk management objectives through its organisation, structure and governance, its measurement, reporting and system of internal ratings and its mechanisms for credit risk mitigation.

We then provide a summary of the Group’s total assets, including the asset types which give rise to credit risk and counterparty credit risk, namely: loans and advances, debt securities and derivatives.

On pages 76 to 89, we set out a detailed analysis of the Group’s loans and advances across a number of asset classes and businesses referencing significant portfolios and including summary measures of asset quality.

We next provide disclosures and analyses of the credit risk profiles of these asset categories, beginning with Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures by asset class, covering current exposures, losses during 2008, sales and paydowns, foreign exchange movements and, where appropriate, details of collateral held, geographic spread, vintage and credit quality. These are given on pages 93 to 105.

Finally, additional analysis of debt securities and derivatives can be found on pages 90 and 91 to 92.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

67


LOGO

Risk management

Credit risk management

Organisation and structure

Barclays has structured the responsibilities of credit risk management so that decisions are taken as close as possible to the business, whilst ensuring robust review and challenge of performance, risk infrastructure and strategic plans.

The credit risk management teams in each business are accountable to the Business Risk Directors in those businesses who, in turn, report to the heads of their businesses and also to the Risk Director.

These credit risk management teams assist Group Risk in the formulation of Group Risk policy and its implementation across the businesses.

Examples include:

 

 

maximum exposure guidelines to limit the exposures to an individual customer or counterparty

 

 

country risk policies to specify risk appetite by country and avoid excessive concentration of credit risk in individual countries

 

 

policies to limit lending to certain industrial sectors

 

 

underwriting criteria for personal loans and maximum loan-to-value ratios for home loans

Within Group Risk, the Credit Risk function provides Group-wide direction of credit risk-taking. This functional team manages the resolution of all significant credit policy issues and runs the Credit Committee, which approves major credit decisions.

The principal Committees that review credit risk management, formulate overall Group credit policy and resolve all significant credit policy issues are the Group Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committee, the Group Retail Credit Risk Management Committee, the Risk Oversight

Committee and the Board Risk Committee (see page 69 for more details of this Committee).Committee. The Board Audit Committee also reviews the impairment allowance as part of financial reporting.

The Group Credit Risk Impairment Committee (GCRIC), on a semi-annual basis, obtains assurance on behalf of the Group that all businesses are recognising impairment in their portfolios accurately and promptly in their recommendations and in accordance with policy, accounting standards and established governance.

GCRIC exercises the authority of the Group Risk Director, as delegated by the Group Chief Executive, and is chaired by Barclays Credit Risk Director. GCRIC reviews the movements to impairment in the businesses, including those already agreed at Credit Committee, as well as Potential Credit Risk Loans, loan loss rates, asset quality metrics and Risk Tendency.

These committees are supported by a number of Group policies including:

Group Retail and Wholesale Impairment and Provisioning Policies

Group Retail and Wholesale Expected Loss Policies

Group Model Policy

GCRIC makes twice-yearly recommendations to the Board Audit Committee on the adequacy of Group impairment allowances. Impairment allowances are reviewed relative to the risk in the portfolio, business and economic trends, current policies and methodologies, and our position against peer banks.

GCRIC has delegated the detailed review of loan impairment in the businesses to the Retail and Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committees.


 

7468 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGORisk management

Credit risk management

Measurement, reporting and internal ratings

The principal objective of credit risk measurement is to produce the most accurate possible quantitative assessment of the credit risk to which the Group is exposed, from the level of individual facilities up to the total portfolio.

The key building blocks in this quantitative assessment are:

 

· 

Probability of default (PD)

 

· 

Exposure in the event of default (EAD)

 

· 

Severity of lossLoss given default (LGD)

Barclays first began to use internal estimates of PD (internal ratings) in all its main businesses in the 1990s. Internally derived estimates for PD, EAD and LGD have since been used since then in all our major risk decision makingdecision-making processes, enabling the application of coherent risk measurement across all credit exposures, retail and wholesale.

With the advent of the Basel II accord on banking, Barclays has been given permission to use internal rating models as an input into its regulatory capital calculations. In preparation, Barclays has spent considerable time developing and upgrading a number of such models across the Group, moving towards compliance with the Basel II advanced internal ratings based approach. As part of this process, all Basel credit risk models arehave been assessed against the Basel II minimum requirements prior to model sign-off to ensure that they are fit to be used for regulatory purposes.

Applications of internal ratings

The three components described above – the probability of default, exposure at defaultPD, EAD and loss given defaultLGD – are building blocks used in a variety of applications that measure credit risk across the entire portfolio.

Two examples are Risk Tendency (RT) and Expected Loss (EL) which are statistical estimates These parameters can be calculated incorporating different aspects of the average loss for the loan portfolio for a 12-month period, taking into account the portfolio’s size and risk characteristics under either current credit conditions (RT) or average credit conditions (EL). As such, RT uses a point-in-time PD while EL uses a through-the-cycle PD but the basic calculation is the same for both:

PD x EAD x LGD

Since through-the-cycle PDs provide a measure of risk that is independent of the current credit conditions for a particular customer type, they are more stable than point-in-time ratings. RT and EL provide insightcycle into the credit quality of the portfolio and assist managementestimates:

PD estimates can be calculated on a through-the-cycle (TTC) basis, reflecting the predicted default frequency in an average 12 month period across the credit cycle, or on a point-in-time (PIT) basis, reflecting the predicted default frequency in the next 12 months.

LGD and EAD estimates can be calculated as downturn measures, reflecting behaviour observed under stressed economic conditions, or as business-as-usual (BAU) measures, reflecting best modelled behaviour under actual conditions.

These parameters, in tracking risk changes as the Group’s stocksuitable combination, are used in a wide range of credit exposures evolves in size or risk profile in the course of business.

Asmeasurement and management and as our understanding and experience have developed, we have extended the use and sophistication of internal ratings. The other main business processes that use internal estimates of PD, LGD and EAD, are as follows:ratings into the following:

 

· 

Credit Grading Approval: PD models are used in the approval process in both retail and wholesale portfolios. In high-volume retail portfolios, application and behaviour scorecards are frequently used as decision-making tools. In wholesale and some retail mortgage portfolios, PD models are used to direct applications to different credit sanctioning levels, so that credit risks are reviewed at appropriate levels.

Credit Grading: originally introduced in the early 1990s to provide a common measure of risk across the Group using an eight point rating scale; wholesale credit grading now employs a 21 point scale (Barclays Masterscale).of default probabilities.

 

· 

Credit Approval – a rating scale isRisk-Reward and Pricing: PD, EAD and LGD metrics are used to set differentiated credit sanctioning levels based upon a PD, so that credit risks are reviewed at appropriate levels.assess profitability of deals and portfolios and to allow for risk-adjusted pricing and strategy decisions.

 

· 

Risk Appetite –Appetite: measures of expected loss and the potential volatility of loss are used in the Group’s Risk Appetite framework (see page 71)65).

·

Pricing – within the corporate mass market portfolios we first developed and used risk adjusted pricing models in the early 1990s to differentiate risk reward decisions.

 

· 

IAS Impairment calculations –39: many of our collective impairment estimates incorporate the use of our PD and LGD models.models, adjusted as necessary.

 

·

Collections and Recoveries: model outputs are frequently used to segment portfolios allowing for suitably prioritised collections and recoveries strategies in retail portfolios.

 

Economic capital (EC) allocation –allocation: most EC calculations use the same through-the-cycle PD and EAD inputs as the regulatory capital (RC) process. The process also uses the same underlying LGD model outputs as the RC calculation, but does not incorporate the same economic downturn adjustment used in RC calculations.

 

· 

Risk management information –information: Group Risk and the main business units have for several years received either Key Information Packs or othergenerate risk reports focused on EL and EC information to inform senior management on issues such as the business performance, Risk Appetite and consumption of EC.

Calculation of internal ratings

To calculateprobability of default (PD), Barclays assesses the credit quality of borrowers and other counterparties and assigns them an internal risk rating.

Multiple rating methodologies may be used to inform the rating decision on individual large credits, such as internal and external models, rating agency ratings, and for wholesale assets market information such as credit spreads. For smaller credits, a single source may suffice such as the result from an internal rating model.

Barclays recognises the need for


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

69


LOGO

two different expressions of PD depending on the purpose for which it is used. For the purposes of calculating regulatory and economic capital, long-run average through-the-cycle PDs are required. However, for the purposes of pricing, and risk tendency, PDs should represent the best estimate of probability of default, typically in the next 12 months, dependent on the current position in the credit cycle. Hence, point-in-time PDs are also required.

When eachEach PD model is constructed, its output is specified as one ofoutputs a point-in-time (PIT) or, through-the-cycle (TTC) or a hybrid, e.g. a 50:50 blend. Using this distinction betweenblend, default estimate. Conversion techniques appropriate to the portfolio are then applied to calculate both PIT and TTC the PDs are bucketed into both PIT Default Grades (DGs) and TTC bands, adopting techniques that are relevant to the model’s initial output calibration, the industryestimates. Industry and location of the counterparty and an understanding of the current and long-term credit conditions.conditions are considered in deriving the appropriate conversion. Two gradesratings are therefore recorded for each client, the DGPIT and the TTC band. A customer may therefore be rated DG 6 reflecting sectoral performance and TTC band 8 reflecting long-term credit conditions.

This same PIT/TTC distinction is applied to agency ratings. Within Barclays, an agency alphabet rating is also expressed in terms of PIT DG and TTC band. It is therefore no longer possible to produce a static mapping of agency letter ratings to either DGs or TTC bands because they are considered a hybrid of both PIT and TTC. As such, any mappings would change over time with movements in the credit cycle.estimates.

Barclays internal rating system also differentiates between corporatewholesale and retail customers.

For corporatewholesale portfolios, (primarily Barclays Capital, BCB and the commercial areas of IRCB), the rating system is constructed to ensure that each client receives the same rating independent of the part of the business with which they are dealing. To achieve this, a model hierarchy is adopted which requires users to adopt a specific approach to rating each counterparty depending upon the nature of the business and its location.

A range of methods is approved for estimating wholesale counterparty PDs. These include bespoke grading models developed within the Barclays Group (Internal Models), vendor models such as MKMV Credit Edge and RiskCalc, and a conversion of external alphabet ratings from either S&P, Moody’s or Fitch.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

75


Risk management

Credit risk management Retail models, especially those used for capital purposes, are almost exclusively built internally using Barclays data, although in some cases bureau models may be used in conjunction with these models. In addition, in some low data/low default environments external developments may be utilised for decision-making purposes.

A key element of the Barclays Wholesale framework is the Masterscale.probability of default distribution, which maps PDs into internal grades both for PIT (default grades) and TTC (TTC band) purposes. This has been developed to record differences in the probability of default risk at meaningful levels throughout the risk range (see table below).

range. In contrast to corporatewholesale businesses, retail areas do not bucket exposures into generic grades or bands for account management purposes (although they may be used for reporting purposes). Instead, accounts are managed either at a granular level or based on internal, product specific segmentations of accounts, for instance, deriving from the cut-offs of the associated models. The cut-offs may be in the form of a score, a probability of default, a measure of forecast loss or a more sophisticated risk/reward based measure.bespoke segmentations.

Exposure at default (EAD) represents the expected level of usage of the credit facility when default occurs. At default, the customer may not have drawn the loan fully or may already have repaid some of the principal,

Barclays probability of default grades (wholesale)
DG/TTC    Default Probability                  
Band    >=Min    Mid  <Max

1

    0.00%    0.010%  0.02%

2

    0.02%    0.025%  0.03%

3

    0.03%    0.040%  0.05%

4

    0.05%    0.075%  0.10%

5

    0.10%    0.125%  0.15%

6

    0.15%    0.175%  0.20%

7

    0.20%    0.225%  0.25%

8

    0.25%    0.275%  0.30%

9

    0.30%    0.350%  0.40%

10

    0.40%    0.450%  0.50%

11

    0.50%    0.550%  0.60%

12

    0.60%    0.900%  1.20%

13

    1.20%    1.375%  1.55%

14

    1.55%    1.850%  2.15%

15

    2.15%    2.600%  3.05%

16

    3.05%    3.750%  4.45%

17

    4.45%    5.400%  6.35%

18

    6.35%    7.500%  8.65%

19

    8.65%    10.000%  11.35%

20

    11.35%    15.000%  18.65%

21

    18.65%    30.000%  100.00%

so that exposure is typically less than the approved loan limit. When the Group evaluates loans, it takes exposure at default into consideration, using its extensive historical experience. It recognises that customers may make heavier than average usage of their facilities as they approach default. The lower bound of EAD is the actual outstanding balance at calculation of EAD. For derivative instruments, exposure in the event of default is the estimated cost of replacing contracts with a positive value should counterparties fail to perform their obligations.

When a customer defaults, some part of the amount outstanding on their loansthe loan is usually recovered. The part that is not recovered, the actual loss, together with the economic costs associated with the recovery process, combine to a figure calledcomprise theloss given default(LGD), which is expressed as a percentage of EAD.

Using historical information, the Group can estimateestimates how much is likely to be lost, on average, for various types of loans. To illustrate, LGD is lower for residential mortgages than for unsecured loans becausein the event of the property pledged as collateral.default.

The level of LGD depends principally on: the type of collateral (if any); the seniority or subordination of the exposure; the industry in which the customer operates (if a business); the length of time taken for the recovery process and the timing of all associated cash flows; and the jurisdiction applicable and work-out expenses. The outcome is also dependent on economic conditions that may determine, for example, the prices that can be realised for assets, whether a businessesbusiness can readily be refinanced or the availability of a repayment source for personal customers.

The Barclays Masterscale (Wholesale)

DG/TTC

Band

 Default Probability
 >=Min Mid <Max

1

 0.00% 0.010% 0.02%

2

 0.02% 0.025% 0.03%

3

 0.03% 0.040% 0.05%

4

 0.05% 0.075% 0.10%

5

 0.10% 0.125% 0.15%

6

 0.15% 0.175% 0.20%

7

 0.20% 0.225% 0.25%

8

 0.25% 0.275% 0.30%

9

 0.30% 0.350% 0.40%

10

 0.40% 0.450% 0.50%

11

 0.50% 0.550% 0.60%

12

 0.60% 0.900% 1.20%

13

 1.20% 1.375% 1.55%

14

 1.55% 1.850% 2.15%

15

 2.15% 2.600% 3.05%

16

 3.05% 3.750% 4.45%

17

 4.45% 5.400% 6.35%

18

 6.35% 7.500% 8.65%

19

 8.65% 10.000% 11.35%

20

 11.35% 15.000% 18.65%

21

 18.65% 30.000% 100.00%

The ratings process

The term ‘internal ratings’ usually refers to internally calculated estimates of PD. These ratings are combined with EAD and LGD in the range of applications described previously. The ‘ratings process’ refers to the use of PD, EAD and LGD across the Group. In Barclays, the rating process is defined by each business. For central government and banks, institutions and corporate customers many of the models used in the rating process are shared across businesses as the models are customer specific. For retail exposures, the ratings models are usually unique to the business and product type e.g. mortgages, credit cards, and consumer loans.

Wholesale Approaches

A bespoke model has been built for PD and LGD forSovereign ratings. For Sovereigns where there is no externally available rating, we use an internally developed PD scorecard. The scorecard has been developed using historic data on Sovereigns from an external data provider covering a wide range of qualitative and quantitative information. Our LGD model is based on resolved recoveries in the public domain, with a significant element of conservatism added to compensate for the small sample size.


70

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Measurement, reporting and internal ratings

To construct ratings forinstitutions, corporates, specialised lending and purchased corporate receivables andequity exposures, we use external models, rating agencies and internally constructed models. External models employed include Moody’s Credit Edge, rating agency ratings and Moody’s RiskCalc. The applicability of each of these approaches to our customers has been validated by us to internal rating standards. The data used in validating these primary indicators are representative of the population of the bank’s actual obligors and exposures and its long-term experience.

Internally built PD models are also widely used. We employ a range of methods in the construction of these models. The basic types of PD modelling approaches used are:

 

 

Structural models

 

 

Expert lender

 

 

Statistical

Structural models incorporate in their specification the elements of the industry acceptedindustry-accepted Merton framework to identify the distance to default for a counterparty. This relies upon the modeller having access to specific time series data or data proxies for the portfolio. Data samples used to build and validate these models are typically constructed by adding together data sets from internal default observations with comparable externally obtained data sets from commercial providers such as rating agencies and industry gathering consortia.


76

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Expert lender models are used for parts of the portfolio where the risk drivers are specific to a particular counterparty, but where there is insufficient data to support the construction of a statistical model. These models utilise the knowledge of credit experts that have in depth experience of the specific customer type being modelled. Where possible, the characteristics identified by the expert lenders for use in these models are linked during the modelling process to the Merton framework. This linkage ensures that the model is intuitive and that there is some economic rationale for the default process that is being captured by the model.

For any of the portfolios where we have a low number of default observations we adopt specific rules to ensure that the calibration of the model meets the Basel II and FSA criteria for conservatism. We have developed our own internal policy which describes specific criteria for the use of parametric (e.g. Pluto Tasche) and non-parametric low default portfolio calibration techniques.

Statistical models such as behavioural and application scorecards are used for our high volume portfolios such asSME Small/Medium Enterprises (SME). The model builds typically incorporate the use of large amounts of internal data, combined with supplemental data from external data suppliers. Where external data is sourced to validate or enhance internally-held data as part of the risk assessment process or to support model development and BAU operation, a similar approach is adopted towards ensuring data quality to that applied to the management of internal data. This entails adherence to the Group’s procurement and supplier management process, including the agreement of specifications and service level agreements.

In wholesale portfolios the main approaches to calculate LGD aim to establish the affects of drivers (including industry, collateral coverage, recovery periods, seniority and costs) by looking at Barclays historical experience, supplemented with other external information where necessary. Estimates built using historical information are reviewed to establish whether they can be expected to be representative of future loss rates, and adjusted if necessary.

In a similar fashion, wholesale EAD models estimate the potential utilisation of headroom based on historical information also considering the future outlook of client behaviour.

Typically, modellers do not manipulate external data before using it as input to the model estimation or validation procedure. Changes required in the estimation and validation process are documented in the model build papers.

For all the above asset classes we use the Basel II definition of default, utilising the 90 day past due criteria as the final trigger of default.

Derivative counterparty credit risk measurement

The magnitude of trading exposure is determined by considering the current mark to market of the contract, the historic volatility of the underlying asset and the time to maturity. This allows calculation of a credit equivalent exposure (CEE) for such exposures using a stochastic method and a 98% confidence level.

Retail Approaches

Ourretail banking operations have long and extensive experience of using credit models in assessing and managing risk in their businesses and as a result models play an integral role in retailcustomer approval and customer management (e.g. limit setting, cross-sell etc.) processes.

Models used include PD models, mostly in the form of application and behavioural scorecards, and/or PD/as well as LGD and EAD models. These may be used in isolation, in combination

Application scorecards are derived from the historically observed performance of new clients. They are built using customer demographic and financial information, supplemented by credit bureau information where available. Through statistical techniques, the relationship between these candidate variables and the default marker is quantified to produce measuresoutput scores reflecting a PD. These scores are used primarily for new customer decisioning but are, in some cases, also used to allocate PDs to new customers for the purposes of forecast loss orcapital calculation.

Behavioural scorecards are derived from the historically observed performance of existing clients as partwell as being supplemented by the same data as is used for application scoring, including the use of a suitebureau data. The techniques used to derive the output are the same as for application scoring. The output scores are used for existing customer management activities as well as for allocating PDs to existing customers for the purposes of models that underpin risk/reward based decisions. The score cut-offs will be set at the appropriate level depending on the specific objective, such as ensuring all the accepted accounts meet the minimum required return on EC. capital calculation.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

71


LOGO

It is Barclays philosophy to embed the Basel II models as extensively as possible in the portfolio management process. This is an ongoing initiative and we expect greater convergence over time. However, in some cases there are sound business reasons for having different models for capital allocations and internal processes.

EAD models within retail portfolios are split into two main methodological categories. The less complex models derive product level credit conversion factors (CCFs) from historical balance migrations; these are frequently further segmented at a delinquency bucket level. The most sophisticated EAD models are behavioural based, determining customer level CCFs from characteristics of the individual facility.

Retail LGD models are built using bespoke methods chosen to best model the observed recovery process. In line with Basel II requirements, Barclays will usea number of secured portfolios, structural models are often used which parameterise the LGD drivers giving models which can easily be updated to reflect current market trends. Models based on historical cash collected curves are often utilised in portfolios where recoveries are not based on the recovery of a single source of collateral. Finally, in some instances regression techniques are used to generate predicted LGDs based on account characteristics. In all available relevant data, including data relatinginstances bespoke country level factors are derived to other Barclays accounts and external agency data. Barclays does not use pooled data.discount recovery flows to the point of default. For capital calculations, customised economic downturn adjustments are made to adjust losses to stressed conditions.

Most retail models within Barclays are built in-house, although occasionally external consultants will be contracted to build models on behalf of the businesses. Whilst most models are statistically or empirically derived, some expert lender models (similar to those described above in the wholesale context) are used, particularly where data limitations preclude a more sophisticated approach. For mortgage originations Barclays use a third party scorecard (Omniscore), supported by a series of policy rules, to arrive at a lending decision.

All new models, including third partyWhere models are measured against the required Group minimum standards as detailedused in the Barclays Model Risk Policy.

For retail asset classes, Basel II specifies thatcalculation of regulatory capital, the definition of default must include a trigger based onis in line with the regulatory definition of default requirements i.e. for UK portfolios the default definition is 180 days past due with the number of days being between 90 and 180. All Barclays advanced internal ratings-basedwhilst international regulators may have different rules. In some cases, for models not used in regulatory capital calculations, in order to maximise model suitability, different default definitions are compliant with this, with the majority using 180 days as the trigger. Inused. However, in all cases EAD and LGD models are specified so that they have a definition of default aligned to that used in the corresponding PD model.appropriately aligned.

The control mechanisms for the rating system

Each of the business risk teams is responsible for the design, oversight and performance of the individual credit rating models – PD, LGD and EAD –that– that comprise the credit rating system for a particular customer within each asset class. Group-wide standards in each of these areas are set by Group Risk and are governed through a series of committees with responsibility for oversight, modelling and credit measurement methodologies.

Through their day-to-day activities, key senior management in Group Credit Risk, the businesses and the business risk teams have a good understanding of the operation and design of the rating systems used.

For example:

 

 

The respective Business Risk Heads or equivalents are responsible for supplying a robust rating system.

 

 

The Group Risk Director, Credit Risk Director and Wholesale and Retail Credit Risk Directors are required to understand the operation and design of the rating system used to assess and manage credit risk in order to carry out their responsibilities effectively. This extends to the Business CEOs, Business Risk Directors and the Commercial/ Managing Directors or equivalent.

In addition,Group Model Risk Policyrequires that all models be validated as part of the model build (see page 73)66). This is an iterative process that is carried out by the model owner. Additionally, a formal independent review is carried out after each model is built to check that it is robust, meets all internal and external standards and is documented appropriately. These reviews must be documented and conducted by personnel who are independent of those involved in the model-building process. The results of the review are required to be signed off by an appropriate authority.

In addition to the independent review, post implementation and annual reviews take place for each model. These reviews are designed to ensure compliance with policy requirements such as:

 

 

integration of models into the business process

 

 

compliance with the model risk policy

 

 

continuation of a robust governance process around model data inputs and use of outputs

Model performance is monitored regularly; frequency of monitoring is monthly for those models that are applicable to higher volume or volatile portfolios, and quarterly for lower volume or less volatile portfolios. Model monitoring can includeincludes coverage of the following characteristics: utility, stability, efficiency, accuracy, portfolio and data.

Model owners set performance ranges and define appropriate actions for their models. As part of the regular monitoring, the performance of the models is compared with these operational ranges. If breaches occur, the model owner reports these to the approval body appropriate for the materiality of the model. The model approver is responsible for ensuring completion of the defined action, which may ultimately be a complete rebuild of the model.


 

72

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

77


Risk management

Credit risk management

Risk Tendency

As part of its credit risk management system, the group uses a model-based methodology to assess the point-in-time expected loss of credit portfolios across different customer categories. The approach is termed Risk Tendency and applies to credit exposures not already reported as Credit Risk Loans for both wholesale and retail sectors. Risk tendency models provide statistical estimates of average expected loss levels for a rolling 12-month period based on averages in the ranges of possible losses expected from each of the current portfolios. This contrasts with impairment charges as required under accounting standards, which derive almost entirely from Credit Risk Loans where there is objective evidence of actual impairment as at the balance sheet date.

Since Risk Tendency and impairment allowances are calculated for different parts of the portfolio, for different purposes and on different bases, Risk Tendency does not predict loan impairment. Risk Tendency is provided to present a view of the evolution of the scale and quality of the credit portfolios.

In 2007, Risk Tendency increased 4% (£95m) to £2,355m (2006: £2,260m), significantly less than the 23% growth in the Group’s loans and advances balances. This relatively small rise in Risk Tendency reflected, in particular, the improving risk profile of the UK unsecured loan book. Other factors influencing Risk Tendency included: methodology changes in Barclaycard, UK Retail Banking and International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa; the sale of the Monument portfolio; and a maturing credit risk profile in the international card portfolios.

UK Retail Banking Risk Tendency decreased £30m to £470m (2006: £500m). This reflected an improvement in the credit risk profile in the UK unsecured consumer lending portfolios, partially offset by the impact of methodology changes and asset growth.

Risk Tendency in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £15m to £305m (2006: £290m). This reflected some growth in loan balances offset by improvements in the credit risk profile.

Barclaycard Risk Tendency decreased £190m to £945m (2006: £1,135m). This reflected improvement in the credit risk profile of UK cards, the sale of part of the Monument portfolio and methodology changes in UK cards, partially offset by asset growth in the international portfolios.

Risk Tendency at International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa increased £145m to £220m (2006: £75m), reflecting an increase to the risk profile and balance sheet growth in Emerging Markets and Western Europe.

In International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa, the increase of £110m in Risk Tendency to £255m (2006: £145m) included a change to the methodology following the introduction of Basel compliant, PD, EAD and LGD models. Excluding this change, Risk Tendency increased £90m, reflecting a weakening of retail credit conditions in South Africa after a series of interest rate rises in 2006 and 2007 and balance sheet growth.

Risk Tendency in Barclays Capital increased £45m to £140m (2006: £95m) primarily due to drawn leveraged loan positions. The drawn liquidity facilities on ABS CDO Super Senior positions are classified as credit risk loans and therefore no Risk Tendency is calculated on them.

Since Risk Tendency and impairment allowances are calculated for different parts of the portfolio, for different purposes and on different bases, Risk Tendency does not predict loan impairment.

Credit risk mitigation

The Group uses a wide variety of techniques to reduce credit risk on its lending. The most basic of these is performing an assessment of the ability of a borrower to service the proposed level of borrowing without distress. In addition, the Group commonly obtains security for the funds advanced, such as in the case of a retail or commercial mortgage, a reverse repurchase agreement, or a commercial loan with a floating charge over book debts and inventories. The Group ensures that the collateral held is sufficiently liquid, legally effective, enforceable and regularly valued.

Various forms of collateral are held and commonly includeinclude: cash in major currencies; fixed income products including government bonds; Lettersletters of Credit;credit; property, including residential and commercial; and other fixed assets. For further discussion concerning credit risk mitigation, see credit risk Note 47.

The Group actively manages its credit exposures and when weaknesses in exposures are detected – either in individual exposures or in groups of exposures – action is taken to mitigate the risks. These include steps to reduce the amounts outstanding (in discussion with the customers, clients or counterparties, if appropriate), the use of credit derivatives and, sometimes, the sale of the loan assets. (Credit derivatives may also be traded for profit; details of these activities may be found on page 89 and Note 14 to the accounts).

The Group also uses various forms of specialised legal agreements to reduce risk, including netting agreements which permit it to offset positive and negative balances with customers in certain circumstances to minimise the exposure at default, as well as financial guarantees, and the use of covenants in commercial lending agreements.

Barclays manages the diversification of its portfolio to avoid unwanted credit risk concentrations. A concentration of credit risk exists when a number of counterparties are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions.

Credit risk mitigation to address concentrations takes several dimensions. MaximumWithin wholesale credit risk, maximum exposure guidelines are in place relating to the exposures to any individual counterparty. These permit higher exposures to highly rated borrowers than to lower rated borrowers.with higher ratings. They also distinguish between types of counterparty, for example, between sovereign governments, banks and corporations. Excesses to maximum exposure guidelines are considered individually at the time of credit sanctioning, are reviewed regularly, and are reported to the Risk Oversight Committee and the Board Risk Committee.


‘Wrong way risk’ in a trading exposure arises when there is significant correlation between the underlying asset and the counterparty which in the event of default would lead to a significant mark to market loss.

LOGOWhen assessing the credit exposure of a wrong way trade, analysts take into account the correlation between the counterparty and the underlying asset as part of the sanctioning process. Adjustments to the calculated CEE are considered on a case by case basis.

Notes

aHead office functions and other operations comprises discontinued businesses in transition.

bExcludes ABS CDO Super Senior positions as these are classified as credit risk loans and therefore no Risk Tendency is calculated on them.

78

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

The Risk Oversight Committee has delegated and apportioned responsibility for risk management to the Retail and Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committees.

The Retail Credit Risk Management Committee (RCRMC) oversees exposures, which comprise unsecured personal lending (including small businesses), mortgages and credit cards. The RCRMC monitors the risk profile and performance of the retail

portfolios by receipt of key risk measures and indicators at an individual portfolio level, ensuring mitigating actions taken to address performance are appropriate and timely. Metrics reviewed will consider portfolio composition at both an overall stock and new flow level.

The Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committee (WCRMC) oversees wholesale exposures, comprising lending to businesses, banks, and other financial institutions.institutions and sovereigns. The WCRMC monitors exposure by country, industry sector, individual large exposures and exposures to sub-investment grade countries.

Country concentrations are addressed through thecountry risk policy and utilisation of country limits which specifiesspecify Risk Appetite by country and avoidsavoid excessive concentrations of credits in individual countries. Country risk grades are assigned to all countries where the Group has, or is likely to have, exposure and are reviewed regularly to ensure they remain appropriate.

Country grades, which are derived from long-term sovereign foreign currency ratings, range from 1 (lowest probability of default) to 21 (highest probability of default). A ceiling is applied where a country is graded 12 or worse so that the counterparty cannot normally receive a higher risk grading than the country, unless some form of protection is available in the event of a cross-border event, such as a significant portion of a counterparty’s assets or income being held or generated in hard currency.

To manage exposure to country risk, the Group uses two country limits: the Prudential Guideline and the Country Guideline. The Prudential Guideline is identified through the strict mapping of a country grade to derive a model-driven acceptable level of loss given default.country appetite. The Country Guideline for all graded countries is set by the Group Credit Committee (GCC) based on the Prudential Guideline and the internal appetite forassessment of country risk. The Country Guideline may therefore be above or below the Prudential Guideline.

Country risk is managedcalculated through the application of Country Loss Given Default (CLGD). All cross-border or domestic foreign currency transactions incur CLGD from the Country Guideline agreed at GCC.Credit Committee. The level of CLGD incurred by a counterparty transaction will largely depend on three main factors: the country severity, the product severity and counterparty grade.

CLGD is incurred in the country of direct risk, defined as where the majority of operating assets are held. This may differ from the country of incorporation. However, where transactions are secured with collateral, the country risk can be transferred from the country of the borrower to the country of the collateral provider. This is only permitted where the collateral covers the borrowing and is not expected to decrease over time.

Country Managers are in place for all countries where the Group has exposure and they, under the direction of GCC,Credit Committee, have responsibility for allocating country risk to individual transactions. The total allocation of country limits is monitored on a daily basis by Group Credit Risk, as headed by the Group Credit Risk Director. Discretions exist to increase the Country Guideline above the level agreed by GCCCredit Committee where the Country Guideline is below the Prudential Guideline. All requests to increase the Country Guideline in line with individual discretions must be submitted to and applied centrally through Group Credit Risk.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

73


LOGO

A further mitigant against undesirable concentration of risk is the mandate and scale framework described on page 71.65. Mandate and scale limits, which can also be set at Group level to reflect overall Risk Appetite, can relate either to the stock of current exposures in the relevant portfolio or to the flow of new exposures into that portfolio. Typical limits include the caps on UK commercial investment property lending, the proportion of lending with maturity in excess of seven years and the proportion of new mortgage business that is buy-to-let. The mandate and scale framework also provides protection against undue concentrations within the collateral held.

Concentrations of credit exposure described in this credit risk management section and the following statistical section are not proportionally related to credit loss. Some segments of the Group’s portfolio have and are expected to have proportionally higher credit charges in relation to the exposure than others. Moreover, the volatility of credit loss is different in different parts of the portfolio. Thus, comparatively large credit impairment charges could arise in parts of the portfolio not mentioned here.

Securitisations

In the course of its business, Barclays undertakeshas traditionally undertaken securitisations of its own originated assets as well as the securitisation of third party assets via sponsored conduit vehicles and shelf programmes.

Barclays securitiseshas securitised its own originated assets in order to remove risk frommanage the Group’s credit risk position, to obtain regulatory capital relief, and to obtaingenerate term liquidity for the Group balance sheet.

For these transactions Barclays adopts the following roles in the securitisation process:

 

 

Originator of securitised assets

 

 

Executor of securitisation trades including bond marketing and syndication

 

 

Provider of securitisation trade servicing, including data management, investor payments and reportingreporting.

As at the end 2008 Barclays alsohas securitised its own originated retail and commercial mortgages, credit cards and corporate loans across both funded traditional and synthetic transactions.

Barclays acts as an administrator and manager of multi-seller conduits through which interests in third-party-originated assets are securitised and funded via the issuance of asset backed commercial paper. From a regulatory perspective, Barclays would be defined primarily as a sponsor of these conduits.

In relation to such conduit activity, Barclays may also provide all or a portion of the backstop liquidity to the commercial paper, programme-wide credit enhancement and, as appropriate, interest rate and foreign currency hedging facilities. Barclays receives fees for the provision of these services.

In addition to the above, Barclays has provided swaps to securitisation vehicles, both those sponsored by Barclays and those sponsored by third

parties, in order to provide hedges against interest rate and/or currency movements. This forms part of Barclays Capital’s market making activity in interest rate and foreign exchange products.

Barclays also acts as an investor in third-party securitisations (i.e. where Barclays would not be defined as an originator or a sponsor for regulatory purposes). This includes positions in ABS CDO Super Senior, other US Sub Prime & Alt A and bonds which benefit from monoline credit protection. See ‘Barclays Capital Credit Market Exposures’ on pages 93-105 for further details.

Due to the market disruption experienced since August 2007, the volume of securitisation activity in all forms that Barclays has undertaken has been more limited than previously. In addition, the change in risk weighting of certain assets (for example residential mortgages) and of banks securitisations exposures as a result of the introduction of the Basel II regime means that the extent of regulatory relief obtainable from securitisations has changed.

As such, Barclays own asset securitisation in 2008 was limited mainly to trades where securities have been retained on balance sheet and used as required as in central bank liquidity schemes.

During 2008, Barclays launched Salisbury Receivables Corporations (‘Salisbury’), a multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit modelled after Sheffield Receivables Corporation (‘Sheffield’), which was launched in December 1991. Similar to Sheffield, Salisbury has the ability to issue both US commercial paper (‘CP’) and Euro CP notes to finance client asset-backed receivable transactions. Sponsored conduits primarily fund traditional assets such as credit cards, auto loans, student loans, prime mortgages and trade receivables.

RWAs reported for securitised assets as at December 20072008 are calculated in line with rules set out in IPRU (BANK)FSA regulations as well as any individual guidance received from the FSA as at the end of the period. Barclays has approval to use the Internal Ratings Based Approach for the calculation of RWAs. Within this, period.

As of 1st January 2008, Barclays calculatesthe Group uses the Internal Assessment Approach and the Supervisory Formula Approach to calculate its regulatory capital requirements arising from its securitisation RWAs using the ratings based approach and/or the supervisory formula method as per the FSA’s revised rules, which implement the Basel Accord and Capital Requirements Directive.exposures.

Further information about securitisation activities and accounting treatment is in Note 29. The Group’s accounting policies, including those relevant to securitisation activities (policies 4 and 10), are on pages 149page 179.

For certain transactions, there may be a divergence between the accounting and 152.regulatory treatment of Barclays exposure to securitisations, for example in the treatment of exposure values. This will reflect differing guidance given in the accounting and regulatory regimes which in turn reflect the areas in which the aims of each regime differ.

Barclays employs External Credit Assessment Institutions to provide ratings for its asset backed securities. Their use is dependantdependent on the transaction or asset class involved. For existing transactions, we employ Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch for securitisations of corporate, residential mortgage and other retail exposures and Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s only for securitisations of small and medium-sized entity and revolving retail exposures.


 

74

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

79


Risk management

Credit risk management

MonitoringAnalysis of total assets and credit risk exposures

                

Analysis of total assets

          Sub analysis
Assets  Loans and
advancesa
£m
  

Debt
securities and
other billsb

£m

  Derivatives c
£m
  Reverse
repurchase
agreements d
£m
  Other
£m
  

Assets
subject
to credit
risk

£m

  

Assets not
subject
to credit
risk

£m

  Total
assets
£m
  Credit
market
exposurese
£m

Cash and balances at central banks

              30,019  30,019     30,019   

Items in the course of collection from other banks

              1,695  1,695     1,695   

Treasury and other eligible bills

    4,544        4,544    4,544  

Debt securities

    148,686        148,686    148,686  4,745

Equity securitiesf

              30,535  30,535  

Traded loans

  1,070          1,070    1,070  

Commoditiesg

              802  802  

Total Trading portfolio assets

  1,070  153,230           154,300  31,337  185,637   

Financial assets designated at fair value

                  

Loans and advances

  30,057        130  30,187    30,187  14,429

Debt securities

    8,628        8,628    8,628  

Equity securitiesf

              6,496  6,496  

Other financial assetsh

  1,469      7,283  479  9,231    9,231  

Held on own account

  31,526  8,628    7,283  609  48,046  6,496  54,542   

Held in respect of linked liabilities under investment contractsi

              66,657  66,657  

Derivative financial instruments

        984,802        984,802     984,802  9,234

Loans and advances to banks

  47,707          47,707    47,707  

Loans and advances to customers

  461,815              461,815     461,815  12,808

Debt securities

    58,831        58,831    58,831  727

Equity securitiesf

              2,142  2,142  

Treasury and other eligible bills

    4,003        4,003    4,003  

Available for sale financial instruments

     62,834           62,834  2,142  64,976   

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

        130,354    130,354    130,354  

Other assets

          3,096  3,096  3,206  6,302  109

Current tax assets

              389  389  

Investments in associates and joint ventures

              341  341  

Goodwill

              7,625  7,625  

Intangible assets

              2,777  2,777  

Property, plant and equipment

              4,674  4,674  

Deferred tax assets

              2,668  2,668  

Total on-balance sheet

  542,118  224,692  984,802  137,637  35,419  1,924,668  128,312  2,052,980   

Off-balance sheet:

                  

Acceptances and endorsements

            585      

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements

            53,942      

Commitments

            260,816      1,030

Total off-balance sheet

                 315,343         

Total maximum exposure to credit risk

                 2,240,011         

Notes

aFurther analysis of loans and advances is on pages 76 to 89

bFurther analysis of debt securities and other bills is on page 90

cFurther analysis of derivatives is on pages 91 to 92.

dReverse repurchase agreements comprise primarily short-term cash lending with assets pledged by counterparties securing the loan.

eFurther analysis of Barclays Capital credit market exposures is on pages 93 to 105.

fEquity securities comprise primarily equity securities determined by available quoted prices in active markets.

gCommodities primarily consists of physical inventory positions.

hThese instruments consist primarily of loans with embedded derivatives and reverse repurchase agreements designated at fair value.

iFinancial assets designated at fair value in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts have not been further analysed as the Group is not exposed to the risks inherent in these assets.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

75


LOGO

Risk management

Credit risk management

Loans and advances

As the granting of credit is one of the Group’s major sources of income and its most significant risk, the Group dedicates considerable resources to gaining a clear and accurate understanding of credit risk across the business and ensuring that its balance sheet correctly reflects the value of the assets in accordance with applicable accounting principles. This process can be broken down intosummarised in the following broad stages:

 

 

Measuring exposures and concentrations

 

 

Monitoring weakness in exposures

 

 

Identifying potential problem loans and credit risk loans (collectively known as potential credit risk loans or PCRLs)

 

 

Raising allowances for impaired loans

 

 

Writing off assets when the whole or part of a debt is considered irrecoverable

Fig. 1: Loans and advances

   2007
£m
  2006

£m

Retail businesses

    

Banks

  —    —  

Customers

  164,062  139,350

Total retail businesses

  164,062  139,350

Wholesale businesses

    

Banks

  40,123  30,930

Customers

  185,105  146,281

Total wholesale businesses

  225,228  177,211

Loans and advances

  389,290  316,561

LOGO

Measuring exposures and concentrations

Loans and advances to customers provide the principal source of credit risk to the Group although Barclays can also be exposed to other forms of credit risk

through loans to banks, loan commitments, contingent liabilities and debt securities; see page 46)securities . The value of outstanding loans and advances balances, their risk profile, and potential concentrations within them can therefore have a considerable influence on the level of credit risk in the Group.

As at 31st December 2007, outstanding2008, total loans and advances to customers and banks net of impairment allowance were valued£542,118m (2007: £410,789m), a rise of 32% on the previous year. Loans and advances at £389bn (2006: £317bn), of which £349bn (2006: £286bn) was granted to personal or corporate customers (see figure 1)amortised cost were £509,522m (2007: £385,518m) and loans and advances at fair value were £32,596m (2007: £25,271m). Loans and advances were well distributed across the retail and wholesale portfolios.

Loans and advances were also well spread across industry classifications (figure 2). Excluding Financial Services,classifications. Barclays largest sectoral exposures areexposure is to home loans which, combined with other personal and business services sectors ,comprise 48% of total loans and other services.advances (2007: 53%). These categories are generally comprised of small loans, have low volatility of credit risk outcomes, and are intrinsically highly diversified.

Balances Growth in loans and advances to the financial services sector reflected an increased client base in the fund management business and increases in cash collateral. Loans and advances are alsofurther diversified across a number of geographical regions, (figure 3, based on location of customers). The majority of Barclays exposure is to the UK, which includes secured home loans exposure, followed by the United States, Africa and the rest of the European Union.

LOGO

Fig. 4: Analysis of loans-to-value ratios of mortgages in the UK home loan portfolio at 31st December 2007 %

LOGO


LOGO

 

Table 1: Loans and advances at amortised cost

 

                
As at 31st December 2008  Gross
loans and
advances
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Loans and
advances net
of impairment
£m
  Credit risk
Loans £m
  CRLs % of
gross loans
and advances
%
  

Impairment
charge

£m

  Loan loss
rates
basis points
 
Wholesale – customers  266,750  2,784  263,966  8,144  3.1  2,540  95 
Wholesale – banks  47,758  51  47,707  48  0.1  40  8 

Total wholesale

  314,508  2,835  311,673  8,192  2.6  2,580  82 
Retail – customers  201,588  3,739  197,849  7,508  3.7  2,333  116 

Total retail

  201,588  3,739  197,849  7,508  3.7  2,333  116 

Total

  516,096  6,574  509,522  15,700  3.0  4,913  95 
As at 31st December 2007                             

Wholesale – customers

  187,086  1,309  185,777  5,157  2.8  1,190  64 

Wholesale – banks

  40,123  3  40,120      (13) (3)

Total wholesale

  227,209  1,312  225,897  5,157  2.3  1,177  52 

Retail – customers

  162,081  2,460  159,621  4,484  2.8  1,605  99 

Total retail

  162,081  2,460  159,621  4,484  2.8  1,605  99 

Total

  389,290  3,772  385,518  9,641  2.5  2,782  71 

 

8076 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGORisk Management

Credit Risk Management

Loans and advances

 

based on location of customers. The majority of Barclays exposure is now outside the UK, reflecting higher rates of growth in the international portfolios as well as the effects of currency movements in 2008.

Barclays also actively monitors exposure and concentrations to sub-investment grade countries (see country risk policy, page 73). Details of the 15 largest sub-investment grade countries, by limit, are shown in figure 3.

Contractual maturity represents a further area of potential concentration. The analysis shown in figure 4 indicates that just over 40% of loans to customers have a maturity of more than five years; the majority of this segment comprises secured home loans.

Barclays risk is therefore spread across a large number of industries and customers and in the case of home loans, for example, well secured. These classifications have been prepared at the level of the borrowing entity. This means that a loan to the subsidiary of a major corporation is classified by the industry in which the subsidiary operates, even through the parent’s predominant sphere of activity may be in a different industry.

UK exposure to home loans accounts for just over 60 per cent of the Group’s total home loans exposure. The loan-to-value ratios (LTV) on the Group’s UK home loan portfolio are shown in figure 4. The valuations in the chart are those which applied at the last credit decision on each loan, i.e. when the customer last requested an increase in the limit or, if there has been no increase, at inception of the loan. Business flows (new business versus loans redeemed) have not materially changed the risk profile of the portfolio.

The impact of house price inflation will result in a reduction in LTV ratios within the mortgage book on a current valuation basis. On this basis, LTV on the residential mortgage book averaged 33% at the end of 2007 (2006: 34%). This ratio is a point-in-time analysis of the stock with LTV updated to current house prices by reference to an external price index and as a result may be influenced by external market conditions as well as changes in the stock of loans.

 

Barclays also actively monitors the risk profile of itsCorporate and wholesale loans and advances

Gross loans and advances to wholesale customers and banks grew 38% to £314,508m (31st December 2007: £227,209m), largely due to Barclays Capital where loans and advances increased £72,514m (53%).

Credit Risk Loans (CRLs) rose 59% to £8,192m (31st December 2007: £5,157m). As a percentage of gross loans and advances, CRLs increased 13% to 2.6% (31st December 2007: 2.3%). CRL balances were higher in all businesses, reflecting the downturn in economic conditions, with some deterioration across default grades, higher levels of Early Warning List balances and a viewrise in impairment and loan loss rates in most wholesale portfolios. The largest rises were in Barclays Capital and GRCB – Western Europe.

Impairment charges on loans and advances rose 119% (£1,403m) to £2,580m (31st December 2007: £1,177m), primarily in Barclays Capital, although all other businesses were higher than the early detection of any concentrationsprevious year. Impairment in higher risk segments. Figure 5 depicts Barclays wholesale loan profile by existing risk grade (see page 67 for a description ofCommercial Bank rose in both the rating system). The majority of Barclays exposure is to the higher quality names with just under 70% of exposure to customers with a DG of 10 or better. It is important to note that Barclays prices loans to risk. Thus, higher risk loans will usually have higher interest rates or fees or both. The profitability of a higher risk portfolio may, therefore, equal or exceed that of a lower-risk portfolio.

Barclays also actively monitors exposureLarger and concentrations to sub-investment grade countries (see country risk policy, page 66). Details of the 15 largest sub-investment grade countries, by limit, are shown in figure 6.

Contractual maturity represents a further area of potential concentration. The analysis shown in figure 7 indicates that just over 40% of loans to customers have a maturity of more than five years; the majority of this segment comprises secured home loans.


 

LOGOLOGO

 

Table 2: Wholesale loans and advances to customers and banks

 

               
As at 31st December 2008  Gross
loans and
advances
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Loans and
advances net
of impairment
£m
  

Credit risk
Loans

£m

  CRLs % of
gross loans
and advances
%
  

Impairment
charge

£m

  Loan loss
rates
basis points

Barclays Commercial Bank

  68,904  504  68,400  1,181  1.70  414  60

Barclaycard

  301  2  299  20  6.60  11  365

GRCB – Western Europe

  15,432  232  15,200  578  3.70  125  81

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  7,551  122  7,429  191  2.50  36  48

GRCB – Absa

  8,648  140  8,508  304  3.50  19  22

Barclays Capital

  208,596  1,796  206,800  5,743  2.80  1,936  93

Barclays Global Investors

  834    834        

Barclays Wealth

  3,282  28  3,254  174  5.30  28  85

Head office

  960  11  949  1  0.10  11  115

Total

  314,508  2,835  311,673  8,192  2.60  2,580  82
As at 31st December 2007                            

Barclays Commercial Bank

  65,535  483  65,052  956  1.50  292  45

Barclaycard

  295  3  292  17  5.80  9  305

GRCB – Western Europe

  10,927  63  10,864  93  0.90  19  17

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  4,833  79  4,754  119  2.50  10  21

GRCB – Absa

  5,321  112  5,209  97  1.80  11  21

Barclays Capital

  136,082  514  135,568  3,791  2.80  833  61

Barclays Global Investors

  211    211        

Barclays Wealth

  2,745  7  2,738  47  1.70    

Head office

  1,260  51  1,209  37  2.90  3  24

Total

  227,209  1,312  225,897  5,157  2.30  1,177  52

BarclaysAnnual Report 200877


LOGO

Medium Business divisions. Deterioration in the Spanish commercial and residential property markets led to higher impairment in GRCB –Western Europe, while in GRCB – Absa, wholesale credit impairment began to rise from a low base and credit indicators began to show deterioration. The loan loss rate on the wholesale and corporate portfolio rose to 82bp (2007: 52bp).

In the wholesale and corporate portfolios impairment allowances increased 116% to £2,835m (31st December 2007: £1,312m).

Barclays largest corporate loan portfolios continue to be in Barclays Capital and Barclays Commercial Bank. Barclays Capital’s corporate loan book grew 43% to £72,796m in 2008, driven by the decline in the value of Sterling relative to other currencies as well as drawdowns on existing loan facilities and the extension of new loans at current terms to financial and manufacturing institutions. Loans and advances at amortised cost grew 5% in Barclays Commercial Bank and was focused in lower-risk portfolios in Larger Business.

Portfolio growth rates were higher in the international businesses, where Global Retail and Commercial Banking’s wholesale portfolios in Western Europe, Emerging Markets and Absa grew by 40%, 56% and 63%, respectively.

Analysis of Barclays Capital wholesale loans and advances net of impairment allowances

Barclays Capital wholesale loans and advances increased 53% to £208,596m (2007: £136,082m). This was driven by a decline in the value of Sterling relative to other currencies, increased drawdowns on existing corporate lending facilities and the extension of new loans to corporate clients at current terms. Additionally, continuing market volatility resulted in increased cash collateral being placed with clients relating to OTC derivatives.

The corporate lending portfolio, including leveraged finance, increased 47% to £76,556m (2007: £52,258) primarily due to drawdowns on existing loan facilities and the extension of new loans at current terms to financial and manufacturing institutions.

Included within corporate lending and other wholesale lending portfolios are £7,674m of loans backed by retail mortgage collateral.

Barclays Capital loans and advances held at fair value

Barclays Capital loans and advances held at fair value were £19,630m (2007: £18,259m). These assets are primarily made up of US RMBS whole loans and commercial real estate loans, £14,429m of which is discussed within the credit market exposures.


 

Table 3: Analysis of wholesale loans and advances net of impairment allowances

 

               
   Corporate  Government  Settlement
balance and
cash collateral
  Other wholesale  Total wholesale
Wholesale  2008
£m
  

2007

£m

  2008
£m
  

2007

£m

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  

2008

£m

  

20 07

£m

BCB

  67,741  64,773  659  279          68,400  65,052

Barclaycard

  299  292              299  292

GRCB – Western Europe

  15,017  10,721  32  4      151  139  15,200  10,864

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  5,283  3,276  1,709  1,193      437  285  7,429  4,754

GRCB – Absa

  8,480  5,204  28  5          8,508  5,209

Barclays Capital

  72,796  51,038  3,760  1,220  79,418  46,639  50,826  36,671  206,800  135,568

BGI

  834  211              834  211

Barclays Wealth

  3,254  2,738              3,254  2,738

Head office

  949  1,209              949  1,209

Total

  174,653  139,462  6,188  2,701  79,418  46,639  51,414  37,095  311,673  225,897

 

Table 4: Analysis of Barclays Capital’s loans and advances at amortised cost

 

            
As at 31st December 2008  Gross
loans and
advances
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Loans and
advances net
of impairment
£m
  

Credit risk
Loans

£m

  CRLs % of
gross loans
and advances
%
  

Impairment
charge

£m

  Loan loss
rates
basis points

Loans and advances bank

              

Cash collateral and settlement balances

  19,264    19,264        

Interbank lending

  24,086  51  24,035  48  0.2  40  17

Loans and advances to customers

              

Corporate lending

  77,042  486  76,556  1,100  1.4  305  40

ABS CDO Super Senior

  4,117  1,013  3,104  4,117  100.0  1,383  3,359

Other wholesale lending

  23,933  246  23,687  478  2.0  208  87

Cash collateral and settlement balances

  60,154    60,154        

Total

  208,596  1,796  206,800  5,743  2.8  1,936  93

78

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk Management

Credit Risk Management

Loans and advances

Analysis of Barclays Commercial Bank loans and advances

The tables below analyse the industry split of Barclays Commercial Bank loans and advances after impairment allowance of £504m. The loan book consists of both loans and advances held at amortised cost and loans and advances held at fair value.

Loans and advances held at fair value were £12,966m as at 31st December 2008. Of these, £12,360m related to government, local authority and social housing. Fair value exceeds amortised cost by £3,018m. Fair value is calculated using a valuation model with reference

to observable market inputs and is matched by offsetting fair value movements on hedging instruments. The underlying nominal portfolio increased 47% in 2008.

Property balances within loans and advances at amortised cost and held at fair value totalled £16,351m, of which £8,795m related to social housing.

The weighted average of the drawn balance loss given default, for all of the above loans and advances, was 31%.


Table 5: Analysis of Barclays Commercial Bank loans and advances

 

Loans and advances to banks at amortised cost

Total
£m

Financial institutions and services

867

Total

867

Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost

Total
£m

Business and other services

16,611

Construction

3,974

Energy and water

1,112

Financial institutions and services

6,427

Finance Lease receivables

6,644

Manufacturing

8,378

Postal and communications

1,303

Property

8,985

Transport

2,014

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

11,426

Government

659

Total

67,533

Loans and advances held at fair value

Total
£m

Business and other services

535

Construction

39

Financial institutions and services

32

Property

7,366

Government

4,994

Total

12,966

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

79


LOGO

Barclays Commercial Bank financial sponsor leveraged finance

As at 31st December 2008, the exposure relating to financial sponsor related leveraged finance loans in Barclays Commercial Bank was £2,445m, of which £1,875m related to drawn amounts recorded in loans and advances.


Table 6: Barclays Commercial Bank financial sponsor leveraged finance

Leveraged finance exposure by region

As at 31st December 2008

£m

UK

2,111

Europe

323

Other

11

Total lending and commitments

2,445

Underwriting

28

Total exposure

2,473

The industry classification of the exposure was as follows:

Leveraged finance exposure by industry

As at 31st December 2008  Drawn
£m
  Undrawn
£m
  Total
£m

Business and other services

  1,083  288  1,371

Construction

  12  5  17

Energy and water

  43  17  60

Financial institutions and services

  58  10  68

Manufacturing

  307  130  437

Postal and communications

  35  2  37

Property

  26  5  31

Transport

  14  43  57

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  297  70  367

Total exposure

  1,875  570  2,445

80

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk Management

Credit Risk Management

Loans and advances

Retail loans and advances

Gross Loans and Advances to retail customers grew 24% to £201,588m (31st December 2007: £162,081m). The principal drivers were GRCB – Western Europe, UK Retail Banking, and Barclaycard. The GRCB – Western Europe retail portfolio grew by £14,436m (59%) to £38,918m, largely driven by home loans in Spain and Italy, and the appreciation of the Euro against Sterling. The UK Retail Banking portfolio increased by £12,319m (15%) to £96,083m, primarily driven by UK home loans. The Barclaycard Retail portfolios grew by £8,866m (43%) to £29,390m, with growth across the US, UK and Barclaycard’s other European card portfolios.

Total home loans to retail customers grew by 27% to £135,077m, driven by the 58% rise in GRCB – Western Europe, reflecting currency movements and book growth. The UK home finance portfolios within UK Retail Banking grew 18% to £82,303m (31st December 2007: £69,805m).

Unsecured retail credit (credit card and unsecured loans) portfolios grew 43% to £38,856m (31st December 2007: £27,256m), principally as a result of growth in Barclaycard US and GRCB – Western Europe as well as the acquisition of Goldfish in the UK.


Table 7: Retail loans and advances net of impairment allowances

As at 31st December 2008  Gross
loans and
advances
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Loans and
advances net
of impairment
£m
  

Credit risk
Loans

£m

  CRLs % of
gross loans
and advances
%
  

Impairment
charge

£m

  Loan loss
rates
basis points

UK Retail Banking

  96,083  1,134  94,949  2,403  2.50  602  63

Barclaycard

  29,390  1,677  27,713  2,566  8.70  1,086  370

GRCB – Western Europe

  38,918  302  38,616  794  2.00  171  44

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  4,083  191  3,892  179  4.40  130  318

GRCB – Absa

  24,677  411  24,266  1,518  6.20  328  133

Barclays Wealth

  8,437  24  8,413  48  0.60  16  19

Total

  201,588  3,739  197,849  7,508  3.70  2,333  116

As at 31st December 2007

                     

UK Retail Banking

  83,764  1,005  82,759  2,063  2.50  559  67

Barclaycard

  20,524  1,093  19,431  1,601  7.80  818  399

GRCB – Western Europe

  24,482  81  24,401  250  1.00  57  23

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  1,881  44  1,837  67  3.60  29  154

GRCB – Absa

  24,994  235  24,759  499  2.00  135  54

Barclays Wealth

  6,436  2  6,434  4  0.10  7  11

Total

  162,081  2,460  159,621  4,484  2.80  1,605  99

Table 8: Analysis of retail loans and advances net of impairment allowances

    Home loans  Cards and unsecured loans  Other retail  Total retail
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

UK Retail Banking

  82,303  69,805  8,294  8,297  4,352  4,657  94,949  82,759

Barclaycard

      23,224  14,930  4,489  4,501  27,713  19,431

GRCB – Western Europe

  33,760  21,393  4,395  2,660  461  348  38,616  24,401

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  603  285  2,900  1,369  389  183  3,892  1,837

GRCB – Absa

  18,411  15,136  43    5,812  9,623  24,266  24,759

Barclays Wealth

          8,413  6,434  8,413  6,434

Total

  135,077  106,619  38,856  27,256  23,916  25,746  197,849  159,621

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

 81


LOGO

Home Loans

The Group’s principal home loans portfolios continue to be in the UK Retail Banking Home Finance business (61% of the Group’s total), GRCB – Western Europe (25%) primarily Spain, and South Africa (14%). During the year, the Group managed the risk profile of these portfolios by strengthening underwriting criteria and reducing the maximum loan to value (LTV) ratios, with greater discrimination between purchases and remortgages and, within the UK buy to let (BTL) segment, between portfolio customers and single property investors.

Credit quality of the principal home loan portfolios reflected relatively low levels of high LTV lending. The LTVs on the Group’s principal home loan portfolios are shown in table 9. Using recent valuations, the LTV of the portfolios as at 31st December 2008 was 40% for UK Retail Banking’s mortgage business, 48% for the Spanish mortgage portfolio within GRCB – Western Europe and 41% for GRCB – Absa’s mortgage portfolio in South Africa. The average LTV for new mortgage business during 2008 at origination for these portfolios was 47% for the UK, 63% for Spain and 58% for South Africa. The percentage of balances with an LTV of over 85% based on current values was 10% for the UK, 5% for Spain and 25% for South Africa. In the UK, BTL mortgages comprised 6.8% the total stock.

Impairment charges rose across the home loan portfolios, reflecting the impact of lower house prices as well as some increase in arrears rates. Three-month arrears as at 31st December 2008 were 0.91% for UK

mortgages, 0.76% for Spain and 2.11% for South Africa. To support the Group’s risk profile, we increased collections staff across the businesses and improved operational practices to boost effectiveness.

Credit Cards and Unsecured Loans

The Group’s largest card and unsecured loan portfolios are in the UK (47% of Group total). The US accounts for 19%, where Barclaycard’s portfolio is largely Prime credit quality (FICO score of 660 or more). To address the impact of economic deterioration and the impact of weaker labour markets on the unsecured portfolios in 2008, the Group used a range of measures to improve new customer quality and control the risk profile of existing customers.

In the UK Cards portfolio, initial credit lines were made more conservative, followed by selective credit limit increases using more accurately assessed customer behaviour. The overall number of credit limit increases were reduced by strengthening qualification criteria and a proportion of higher-risk dormant accounts were closed. Arrears rates in the UK Cards portfolio fell slightly during the year, reflecting measures taken to improve customer quality in 2007 and 2008. Repayment Plan balances grew to support government initiatives to supply relief to customers experiencing financial difficulty. Payment rates in repayment plans remained relatively stable.

As a percentage of the portfolio, three-month arrears rates rose during 2008 to 1.87% for UK Loans and 2.15% for US Cards. The rate reduced to 1.28% for UK Cards.


Table 9: Home loans – distribution of balances by loan to value (mark to market)a

    UK  Spain  South Africa
   2008

%

  2007

%

  2008

%

  2007

%

  2008

%

  2007

%

<= 75%

  78.2  90.1  86.7  92.2  60.5  68.6

> 75% and <= 80%

  6.1  4.7  4.8  4.2  7.5  7.2

> 80% and <= 85%

  5.5  2.5  3.7  1.6  7.2  7.1

> 85% and <= 90%

  4.5  1.5  1.6  0.7  7.6  5.9

> 90% and <= 95%

  2.5  0.9  1.3  0.6  6.7  6.1

> 95%

  3.1  0.3  1.9  0.7  10.5  5.1

Portfolio loan-to-value (mark to market)

  40  34  48  45  41  38

Average loan-to-value on new mortgages during the year

  47  49  63  63  58  59

 

Table 10: Home loans three-month arrearsa, b

 

    As at
31.12.08
%
  As at
30.06.08
%
  As at
31.12.07
%

UK

  0.91  0.70  0.63

Spain

  0.76  0.46  0.24

South Africa

  2.11  0.96  0.25

 

Table 11: Unsecured lending three-month arrearsc

 

    As at
31.12.08
%
  As at
30.06.08
%
  As at
31.12.07
%

UK Cards

  1.28  1.36  1.36

UK Loans

  1.87  1.40  1.35

US Cards

  2.15  2.08  1.83

Note

aBased on the following portfolios: UK: UKRB Residential Mortgage and Buy to Let portfolios; Spain: GRCB – Western Europe Spanish retail home finance portfolio; South Africa: GRCB – Absa retail home finance portfolio.

bDefined as total 90 day + delinquent balances as a percentage of outstandings.

cDefined as total 90 day + delinquent balances as a percentage of outstandings. Excludes legal and repayment plans. UK Cards based on Barclaycard Branded Cards, excluding Goldfish. UK Loans based on Barclayloan. US cards excludes Business Card and US Airways portfolios.


82

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk managementManagement

Credit risk managementRisk Management

Loans and advances

 

Monitoring weaknesses in exposures

Barclays actively manages its credit exposures. When weaknesses in exposures are detected – either in individual exposures or in groups of exposures – the Group takes action to mitigate the risks. Such actions may, for example, include: reducing the amounts outstanding (in discussion with the customers, clients or counterparties if appropriate); using credit derivatives securitising the assets; and, on occasion, selling them.

Corporate accounts that are deemed to contain heightened levels of risk are recorded on graded early warning or watch lists comprising three categories graded in line with the perceived severity of increasing concern.the risk attached to the lending, and its probability of default. These are updated monthly and circulated to the relevant risk control points. Once listing has taken place, exposure is very carefully monitored and, where appropriate, exposure reductions are effected.

Should an account become impaired, it will normally, but not necessarily, have passed through all three categories, which reflect the need for ever-increasing caution and control.

Where an obligor’s financial health gives grounds for concern, it is immediately placed into the appropriate

category. All obligors, regardless of financial health, are subject to a full review of all facilities on, at least, an annual basis. More frequent interim reviews may be undertaken should circumstances dictate.

Warning list balances rose throughout the year as wholesale credit conditions deteriorated across the regions in which Barclays operates.

Within Local Business, accounts that are deemed to have a heightened level of risk, or that exhibit some unsatisfactory features which could affect viability in the short/medium term, are transferred to a separate ‘Caution’ stream. Accounts on the Caution stream are reviewed on at least a quarterly basis, at which time consideration is given to continuing with the agreed strategy, returning the customer to a lower risk refer stream, or instigating recovery/exit action.

Within the personal portfolios, which tend to comprise homogeneous assets, statistical techniques more readily allow potential weaknesses to be monitored on a portfolio basis. This applies in parts of UK Retail Banking, Barclays Wealth, International Retail and Commercial BankingGRCB’s international retail portfolios and Barclaycard. The approach is consistent with the Group’s policy of raising a collective impairment allowance as soon as objective evidence of impairment is identified.


CRLs and PPLs balances by UK and non-UK

LOGO

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

bFrom 1st January 2005, the application of IAS 39 required interest to be recognised on the remaining balance of an impaired financial asset (or group of financial assets) at the effective interest rate for that asset. As a result, interest is credited to the income statement

in relation to impaired loans; therefore these loans technically are not classified as ‘non-accrual’. In 2005, the Group replaced the ‘non-accrual’ category with one termed ‘impaired loans’. The SEC requires loans to be classified, where applicable, as non-accrual, accruing past due 90 days or more, ‘troubled debt restructurings’ and potential problem loans.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

83


LOGO

Potential credit risk loans

IfIn line with disclosure requirements from the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US, if the credit quality of a loan on an early warning or watch list deteriorates to the highest category, consideration is given to including it within the Potential Problem Loan (PPL) list. PPLs are loans where payment of principal and interest is up to date but where serious doubt exists as to the ability of the borrowers to continue to comply with repayment terms in the near future.

Should further evidence of deterioration be observed, a loan may move to the Credit Risk Loan (CRL) category.category as required by the SEC. Events that would trigger the transfer of a loan from the PPL to the CRL category could include a missed payment or a breach of covenant.

CRLs comprise three classes of loans:

 

‘Impaired loans’ comprise loans where individual identified impairment allowance has been raised and also include loans which are fully collateralised or where indebtedness has already been written down to the expected realisable value. The impaired loan category may include loans, which, while impaired, are still performing.

LOGO

Notes

 

aIn 2003, credit riskThe category ‘accruing past due 90 days or more’ comprises loans and potential problemthat are 90 days or more past due as to principal or interest. An impairment allowance will be raised against these loans were disclosed based onif the location ofexpected cash flows discounted at the booking office. In 2004-2007 they were disclosed by location of customers.effective interest rate are less than the carrying value.

 

bThe category ‘impaired and restructured loans’ comprises loans not included above where, for economic or legal reasons related to the

debtor’s financial difficulties, a concession has been granted to the debtor that would not otherwise be considered. Where the concession results in the expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate being less than the loan’s carrying value, an impairment allowance will be raised.

In 2007, the term Credit Risk Loans replaced the term Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) as the collective term for the total of these three classes to recognise the fact that the impaired loan category may include loans which, while impaired, are still performing. This category includes drawn ABS CDO Super Senior positions.

Potential Credit Risk Loans (PCRLs) comprise PPLs and CRLs. Figures 5 and 6 show CRL and PPL balances by UK and non-UK. The amounts are shown before deduction of value of security held, impairment allowances (from 2005 onwards) and provisions or interest suspense (2004), all of which might reduce the impact of an eventual loss, should it occur. The significant increase to non-UK CRL and PPL balances, in 2007 and 2008, is principally due to the inclusion of US-located ABS CDO Super Senior positions and other credit market exposures.

Credit Risk Loans

In 2008, CRLs rose 63% to £15,700m (2007: £9,641m). Balances were higher in all businesses as credit conditions deteriorated across Barclays areas of operations and total loans and advances grew. The most notable increases were in Barclays Capital and the non-UK businesses in Global Retail and Commercial Banking.


CRLs and PPLs as a percentage of Loans and Advances

LOGO

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

cbFrom 1st January 2005, the application of IAS 39 required interest to be recognised on the remaining balance of an impaired financial asset (or group of financial assets) at the effective interest rate for that asset. As a result, interest is credited to the income statement

in relation to impaired loans,loans; therefore these loans technically are not classified as ‘non-accrual’. In 2005, the Group replaced the ‘non-accrual’ category with one termed ‘impaired loans’. The SEC requires loans to be classified, where applicable, as non-accrual, accruing past due 90 days or more, ‘troubled debt restructurings’ and potential problem loans.


 

8284 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGORisk management

Credit risk management

Loans and advances

 

The category ‘accruing past due 90 days or more’ comprises loans that are 90 days or more past due as to principal or interest where there is no expectation of ultimate write-off (whether in part or full) of the principal owed. Impairment allowance will be raised against these loans if the expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate is less than the carrying value.

The category ‘impaired and restructured loans’ comprises loans not included above where, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, a concession has been granted to the debtor that it would not otherwise be considered. Where the concession results in the expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate being less than the loan’s carrying value, an impairment allowance will be raised.

CRLs in retail secured mortgage products increased by £1,309m (89%) to £2,783m (2007: £1,474m). The term Credit Risk Loans has replacedkey driver was Absa Home Finance where balances increased significantly as a result of higher interest rates and increasing consumer indebtedness. Increases were also seen in UK Home Finance, reflecting weakening UK house prices and the term Non-Performing Loans (NPLs)slowing economy, and in Spain, as economic conditions deteriorated.

CRLs in the collective termunsecured and other retail portfolios increased by £1,715m (57%) to £4,725m (2007: £3,010m). The key drivers for the total of these three classes since it recognises the fact that the impaired loan category may include loans,this increase were: Absa, which while impaired, are still performing. This category includes drawn ABS CDO Super Senior positions.

Potential Credit Risk Loans (PCRLs) comprise potential problem loans (PPLs)was impacted by higher interest rates and credit risk loans (CRLs). Figures 8 and 9 show CRL and PPL balances by geography. The amounts are shown before deduction of value of security held, impairment allowances (from 2005 onwards) and provisions or interest suspense (2004

and earlier), all of which might reduce the impact of an eventual loss, should it occur. The significant increase to non-UK CRL and PPL balances is principallyincreasing consumer indebtedness, Barclaycard US, due to the inclusion of US-locateddeteriorating credit conditions which resulted in rising delinquency rates, asset growth and exchange rate movements, and Spain, as economic conditions deteriorated and consumer indebtedness increased.

Corporate/Wholesale CRLs, excluding ABS CDO Super Senior positions, increased by £2,262m (125%) to £4,075m (2007: £1,813m). The key drivers were: Barclays Capital following a number of credit downgrades; increasing default probabilities; and otherSpain, primarily due to increases to the property-related names. Balances also increased in Barclays Commercial Bank and Absa Commercial and Banking Business as corporate credit market exposures.conditions deteriorated, particularly in the last quarter of 2008.

Figures 12 and 13 show impairment allowances as a percentage of CRLs and PCRLs. Including the drawnon ABS CDO Super Senior positions allowance coverageincreased £773m (23%) to £4,117m (2007: £3,344m). The majority of this increase resulted from a migration of assets, totalling £801m, from potential problem loans (PPLs) to CRLs.

Potential Problem Loans

Balances within the Group’s potential problem loans (PPLs) category rose by £659m to £2,456m (31st December 2007: £1,797m). The principal movements were in the corporate and wholesale portfolios, where PPLs rose £1,463m to £1,959m (31st December 2007: £496m) as credit conditions deteriorated. This rise was offset by a fall in PPLs relating to ABS CDO positions, as those balances moved into the CRL category. Broadly flat PPLs from retail portfolios reflected methodology alignments affecting GRCB – Absa which transferred balances of just over £200m previously reported as PPLs to CRLs. This was offset by rises in UK Retail Banking, GRCB – Western Europe and GRCB – Emerging Markets.

Potential Credit Risk Loans

Combining CRLs and PCRLs decreasedPPLs, total potential credit risk loans (PCRL) balances in the corporate and wholesale portfolios increased by 161% in 2008 to 39.1%£6,034m (31st December 2006: 65.6%)2007: £2,309m) as a number of names migrated into the CRL and 33.0%PPL categories, reflecting higher default probabilities in the deteriorating global wholesale environment. PCRLs relating to ABS CDO positions remained stable at £4,117m (31st December 2006: 57.0%), respectively. These movements reflect2007: £4,145m).

Total retail PCRL balances increased 61% to £8,005m (31st December 2007: £4,984m) as delinquency rates rose across a number of secured and unsecured portfolios following a deterioration in credit conditions, particularly in the fact that allowance coverage ofUK, US, Spain and South Africa.

Group PCRL balances rose 59% to £18,156m (31st December 2007: £11,438m). Excluding ABS CDO Super Senior credit risk loans was low relativepositions, PCRLs increased 92% to allowance coverage of other credit risk loans since substantial protection against loss is also provided by subordination£14,039m (31st December 2007: £7,293m).


 

Table 12: Potential credit risk loans and coverage ratios

         
    CRLs  PPLs  PCRLs
   31.12.08  31.12.07  31.12.08  31.12.07  31.12.08  31.12.07

Retail Secured

  2,783  1,474  280  317  3,063  1,791

Retail Unsecured and other

  4,725  3,010  217  183  4,942  3,193

Retail

  7,508  4,484  497  500  8,005  4,984

Corporate/Wholesale (excl ABS)

  4,075  1,813  1,959  496  6,034  2,309

Group (excl ABS)

  11,583  6,297  2,456  996  14,039  7,293

ABS CDO Super Senior

  4,117  3,344    801  4,117  4,145

Group

  15,700  9,641  2,456  1,797  18,156  11,438
    Impairment allowance  CRL coverage  PCRL cove rage
   31.12.08  31.12.07  31.12.08  31.12.07  31.12.08  31.12.07

Retail Secured

  561  320  20.2%  21.7%  18.3%  17.9%

Retail Unsecured and other

  3,178  2,140  67.3%  71.1%  64.3%  67.0%

Retail

  3,739  2,460  49.8%  54.9%  46.7%  49.4%

Corporate/Wholesale (excl ABS)

  1,822  1,022  44.7%  56.4%  30.2%  44.3%

Group (excl ABS)

  5,561  3,482  48.0%  55.3%  39.6%  47.7%

ABS CDO Super Senior

  1,013  290  24.6%  8.7%  24.6%  7.0%

Group

  6,574  3,772  41.9%  39.1%  36.2%  33.0%

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

85


LOGO

Impairment Allowances and hedges. OnCoverage Ratios

In 2008, impairment allowances increased 74% to £6,574m (31st December 2007: £3,772m). Excluding ABS CDO Super Senior exposures,positions, allowances increased by 60% to £5,561m (31st December 2007: £3,482m). Allowances increased in all businesses as credit conditions deteriorated, but most notably in Barclays Capital and GRCB’s international portfolios.

Reflecting this 74% rise in impairment allowance compared with the combination63% rise in total CRLs, the Group’s CRL coverage ratio rose to 41.9% (31st December 2007: 39.1%). Coverage ratios for PCRLs rose to 36.2% (31st December 2007: 33.0%).

The largest driver for these increases was the near four-fold increase in the impairment held against ABS CDO Super Senior positions as the LGD of subordination, hedges and write-downs provided protection against loss levels to 72% on US sub-prime collateral as at 31st December 2007.these assets increased.

Figures 14 and 15 show allowanceAllowance coverage ratios of CRLs and PCRLs excluding the drawn ABS CDO Super Senior positions decreased to 55.6%48.0% (31st December 2006: 65.6%2007: 55.3%) and 49.0%39.6% (31st December 2006: 57.0%2007: 47.7%), respectively. These movements in coverage ratios reflected:

An increase in CRLs and PCRLs in the well-secured home loan portfolios.

Higher CRLs and PCRLs in the corporate sector, where the recovery outlook is relatively high.

Increased early-cycle delinquent balances in the retail unsecured portfolios, as credit conditions worsened. These earlier-cycle balances, which tend to attract relatively lower impairment requirements, have increased as a proportion of the total delinquent balances.

The decrease in these ratios reflected a changethe PCRL coverage ratio, excluding the drawn ABS CDO Super Senior positions, was also driven by the overall increase in the mix of CRLs and PCRLs. Unsecured retail exposures, where the recovery outlook is low, decreasedPPLs as a proportion of the total as the collections and underwriting processes were improved. Secured retail and wholesale and corporate exposures, where the recovery outlook is relatively high, increased asPCRLs. Since, by definition, PPLs attract lower

levels of impairment than CRLs, a higher proportion of PCRLs.


LOGO

Notes

aIn 2003, credit risk loans and potential problem loans were disclosed based on the location of the booking office. In 2004-2007 they were disclosed by location of customers.

bDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

83


Risk managementPPLs in total PCRLs will tend to lower the overall coverage ratio.

Credit risk management

Allowances for impairment and other credit provisions

Barclays establishes, through charges against profit, impairment allowances and other credit provisions for the incurred loss inherent in the lending book.

Under IFRS, impairment allowances are recognised where there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more loss events that have occurred after initial recognition, and where these events have had an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or portfolio of financial assets. Impairment of loans and receivables is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. If the carrying amount is less than the discounted cash flows, then no further allowance is necessary.

Impairment is measured individually for assets that are individually significant, and collectively where a portfolio comprises homogenous assets and where appropriate statistical techniques are available.

In terms of individual assessment, the trigger point for impairment is formal classification of an account as exhibiting serious financial problems and where any further deterioration is likely to lead to failure. Two key inputs to the cash flow calculation are the valuation of all security and collateral, andas well as the timing of all asset realisations, after allowing for all attendant costs. This method applies in the corporate portfolios – Barclays Commercial Bank, Barclays Capital and certain areas within International Retail and Commercial BankingGRCB’s international portfolios and Barclaycard.

For collective assessment, the trigger point for impairment is the missing of a contractual payment. The impairment calculation is based on a roll-rate approach, where the percentage of assets that move from the initial delinquency to default are derived from statistical probabilities based on experience. Recovery amounts and contractual interest rates are


LOGO

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.


86

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk Management

Credit Risk Management

Loans and advances

calculated using a weighted average for the relevant portfolio. This method applies to parts of International Retail and Commercial Banking,GRCB’s international portfolios, Barclaycard and UK Retail Banking and is consistent with Barclays policy of raising an allowance as soon as impairment is identified.

Unidentified impairment allowances, albeit significantly lower in amount than those reported above, are also raised to cover losses which are judged to be incurred but not yet specifically identified in customer exposures at the balance sheet date, and which, therefore, have not been specifically reported.

The incurred but not yet reported calculation is based on the asset’s probability of moving from the performing portfolio to being specifically identified as impaired within the given emergence period and then on to

default within a specified period. This is calculated on the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate.

The emergence periods vary across businesses and are based on actual experience and are reviewed on an annual basis. This methodology ensures that the Group only captures the loss incurred at the balance sheet date.

These impairment allowances are reviewed and adjusted at least quarterly by an appropriate charge or release of the stock of impairment allowances based on statistical analysis and management judgement.

Where appropriate, the accuracy of this analysis is periodically assessed against actual losses.

As one of the controls of ensuring that adequate impairment allowances are held, movements in impairment allowances to individual names above £10m are presented to the Group Credit Committee for agreement.

The Group Credit Risk Impairment Committee (GCRIC),charges and other credit provisions in 2008

In 2008, total impairment charges increased 94% (£2,624m) to £5,419m (2007: £2,795m). This figure included impairment charges of £506m

(2007: £13m) on a semi-annual basis, obtains assuranceavailable for sale assets and reverse repurchase agreements.

Impairment charges on behalfloans and advances and other credit provisions increased 77% (£2,131m) to £4,913m (2007: £2,782m) (see table 1 on page 76) reflecting charges of the Group that all businesses are recognising impairment in their portfolios accurately£1,763m against ABS CDO Super Senior and promptly in their recommendationsother credit market exposures and in accordance with policy, accounting standards and established governance.

GCRIC exercises the authority of the Barclays Risk Director, as delegated by the Chief Executive, and is chaired by Barclays Credit Risk Director.

GCRIC reviews the movements toincreased impairment in the businesses, including those already agreed atinternational portfolios within Global Retail and Commercial Banking. Total loans and advances grew 33% to £516,096m (31st December 2007: £389,290m). As a result, impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions as a percentage of period end Group Credit Committee, Potential Credit Risk Loanstotal loans and Risk Tendency.advances increased to 0.95% (2007: 0.71%).

These committees are supported byIn the retail portfolios, impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions rose 45% (£728m) to £2,333m (2007: £1,605m) (see table 1 on page 76) principally as a numberconsequence of Group Policies including: Group Retail Impairment and Provisioning Policy; Group Wholesale Impairment and Provisioning Policy; and, Group Model Policy.

GCRIC makes twice-yearly recommendations to the Board Audit Committee on the adequacy of Groupincreased impairment allowances. Impairment allowances are reviewed relative to the risk in the portfolio, businessinternational portfolios, whilst total loans and advances increased 24% to £201,588m (31st December 2007: £162,081m). As a result, impairment charges as a percentage of period end total loans and advances increased to 1.16% (2007: 0.99%).

In the wholesale and corporate portfolios, impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions rose by 119% (£1,403m) to £2,580m (2007: £1,177m) (see table 1 on page 76) whilst total loans and advances increased 38% to £314,508m (31st December 2007: £227,209m). As a result, impairment charges as a percentage of period end total loans and advances increased to 0.82% (2007: 0.52%).

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Impairment charges in UK Retail Banking increased £43m to £602m (2007: £559m), reflecting growth in the book and deteriorating economic trends,conditions. In UK Home Finance, whilst three month arrears increased from 0.63% to 0.91%, the quality of the book and conservative loan to value ratios meant that the impairment charges and amounts charged off remained low at £24m (2007: £3m release). Impairment charges in Consumer Lending increased 3% reflecting the current policieseconomic environment and methodologies and our position against peer banks.loan growth.


 

Fig. 16: Impairment charges for bad and doubtful debtsLOGO

   2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

UK Banking

  849  887  671

Barclaycard

  838  1,067  753

International Retail and

      

Commercial Banking

  252  167  33

Barclays Capital

  846  42  111

Barclays Global Investors

  –    –    –  

Barclays Wealth

  7  2  2

Head office functions and other operations

  3  (11)  1

Total impairment charges

  2,795  2,154  1,571

Fig. 17 Impairment/provisions charges over five years £

LOGO


NotesNote

 

aDoes2004 does not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

Table 13: Impairment Charges and Other Credit Provisions

 

    Year Ended
31.12.08
£m
  Year Ended
31.12.07
£m

UK Retail Banking

  602  559

Barclays Commercial Bank

  414  292

Barclaycard

  1,097  827

GRCB – Western Europe

  296  76

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  166  39

GRCB – Absa

  347  146

Barclays Capital

  419  64

Barclays Wealth

  44  7
Head office functions and other operations  11  3

Group Total

  3,396  2,013
ABS CDO Sub-Prime and other credit    

Market Provisions

  1,763  782
Group Total (Including ABS CDO)  5,159  2,795
Other AFS Assets and Reverse Repos  260  

Group Total

    
(Including ABS CDO and AFS/Reverse Repos)  5,419  2,795

 

84BarclaysAnnual Report 2008 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

 87


LOGO

 

GCRICThe impairment charge in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £122m to £414m (2007: £292m), primarily reflecting higher impairment losses in Larger Business, particularly in the final quarter as the UK corporate credit environment deteriorated.

The impairment charge in Barclaycard increased £270m (33%) to £1,097m (2007: £827m), reflecting higher charges in Barclaycard International portfolios, particularly Barclaycard US which was driven by loan growth, rising delinquency due to deteriorating economic conditions and exchange rate movements; and £68m from the inclusion of Goldfish. These factors were partially offset by lower charges in UK Cards and secured consumer lending.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Western Europe increased £220m to £296m (2007: £76m) principally due to deteriorating economic trends and asset growth in Spain, where there were higher charges in the commercial portfolios as a consequence of the slowdown in the property and construction sectors. In addition higher household indebtedness and rising unemployment has delegateddriven up delinquency and charge-offs in the detailed reviewpersonal sector.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Emerging Markets increased £127m to £166m (2007: £39m), reflecting: weakening credit conditions which adversely impacted delinquency trends in the majority of loanthe retail portfolios; asset growth, particularly in India; and increased wholesale impairment in Africa.

Impairment charges in GRCB – Absa increased £201m to £347m (2007: £146m) as a result of rising delinquency levels in the businesses to the Retailretail portfolios, which have been impacted by rising interest and Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committees.inflation rates and increasing consumer indebtedness.

In 2007, totalimpairment charges on loansInvestment Banking and advances and other credit provisions increased 30% (£641m) to £2,795m (2006: £2,154m) reflectingInvestment Management

Barclays Capital impairment charges of £782m£2,423m (2007: £846m) included a charge of £1,763m (2007: £782m) against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market positions.

Impairment Further impairment charges on loansof £241m were incurred in respect of available for sale assets and advancesreverse repurchase

agreements (2007: £nil). Other impairment charges increased £355m to £419m (2007: £64m) and primarily related to charges in the private equity and other credit provisions as a percentage of Group total loans and advances rose to 0.71% (2006: 0.65%); total loans and advances grew by 23% to £389,290m (2006: £316,561m).

Retail impairment charges on loans and advances fell 11% (£204m) to £1,605m (2006: £1,809m). Retail impairment charges as a percentage of period-end total loans and advances reduced to 0.98% (2006: 1.30%); total retail loans and advances rose by 18% to £164,062m (2006: £139,350m)

Barclaycard impairment charges improved £229m (21%) to £838m (2006: £1,067m) reflecting reduce flows into delinquency, lower levels of arrears and lower charge-offs in UK Cards. We made changes to our impairment methodologies to standardise our approach and in anticipation of Basel II. The net positive impact of these changes in methodology was offset by the increase in impairment charges in Barclaycard International and secured consumer lending.

Impairment charges in UK Retail Bank decreased by £76m (12%) to £559m (2006: £635m), reflecting lower charges in unsecured Consumer Lending and Local Business driven by improved collection processes, reduced flows into delinquency, lower trends of arrears and stable charge-offs. In UK Home Finance, asset quality remained strong and mortgage charges remained negligible. Mortgage delinquencies as a percentage of outstandings remained stable and amounts charged-off were low.

Impairment charges in International Retail and Commercial Banking –excluding Absa rose by £38m (93%) to £79m (2006: £41m) reflecting very strong balance sheet growth in 2006 and 2007 and the impact of lower releases in 2007.

Arrears in some of International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa’s key retail portfolios deteriorated in 2007, driven by interest rate increases in 2006 and 2007 resulting in pressure on collections.

Wholesale and corporate impairment charges on loans and advances increased £436m to £701m (2006: £265m). Wholesale and corporate impairment charges as a percentage of period-end total loans and advances increased to 0.31% (2006: 0.15%); total loans and advances grew by 27% to £225,228m (2006: £177,211m).

Barclays Capital impairment charges and other credit provisions of £846m included a charge of £782m against ABS CDO Super Senior and other credit market exposure and £58m relating to drawn leveraged finance positions.business.

The impairment charge in Barclays Commercial BankWealth increased by £38m (15%)£37m to £290m (2006: £252m), primarily due£44m (2007: £7m) from a very low base. This increase reflected both the substantial increase in the loan book over the last three years and the impact of the current economic environment on client liquidity and collateral values.

The impairment charge in Head Office Functions and Other Operations increased £8m to higher gross£11m (2007: £3m) mainly reflecting losses on Floating Rate Notes held for hedging purposes. An additional £19m (2007: £nil) of impairment charges in Larger Business, partially offset by a lower charge in Medium Business due to a tightening of the lending criteria.were incurred on available for sale assets.

Writing-off of assets

After an advance has been identified as impaired and is subject to an impairment allowance, the stage may be reached whereby it is concluded that there is no realistic prospect of further recovery. Write-off will occur when, and to the extent that, the whole or part of a debt is considered irrecoverable.

The timing and extent of write-offs may involve some element of subjective judgement. Nevertheless, a write-off will often be prompted by a specific event, such as the inception of insolvency proceedings or other formal recovery action, which makes it possible to establish that some or the entire advance is beyond realistic prospect of recovery. In any event, the position of impaired loans is reviewed at least quarterly to ensure that irrecoverable advances are being written off in a prompt and orderly manner and in compliance with any local regulations.

Such assets are only written off once all the necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined.

Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are written back and hence decrease the amount of the reported loan impairment charge in the income statement.

Total write-offs of impaired financial assets decreasedincreased by £211m£956m to £1,963m (2006: £2,174m)£2,919m (2007: £1,963m).


 

LOGOLOGO

 

Note

 

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

85


Risk management

Market risk management

Market risk management

Market risk is the risk that Barclays earnings or capital, or its ability to meet business objectives, will be adversely affected by changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices such as interest rates, credit spreads, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign exchange rates. The main market risk arises from trading activities. Barclays is also exposed to interest rate risk in the banking book and the pension fund.

Barclays market risk objectives are to:

Understand and control market risk by robust measurement and the setting of position limits.

Facilitate business growth within a controlled and transparent risk management framework.

Ensure traded market risk resides primarily in Barclays Capital.

Minimise non-traded market risk.

Organisation and structure

The Board approves market risk appetite for trading and non-trading activities. The Market Risk Director is responsible for the market risk control framework and, under delegated authority from the Risk Director, sets a limit framework within the context of the approved market risk appetite. A daily market risk report summarises Barclays market risk exposures against agreed limits. This daily report is sent to the Risk Director, the Market Risk Director, the Finance Director and the appropriate Business Risk Directors.

The Head of each business, assisted by the business risk management team, is accountable for all market risks associated with its activities. Each business is responsible for the identification, measurement, management, control and reporting of market risk as outlined in the Barclays Market Risk Control Framework. Oversight and support is provided to the business by the Market Risk Director, assisted by the central market risk team. The Market Risk Committee reviews, approves, and makes recommendations concerning the market risk profile across Barclays including risk appetite, limits and utilisation. The Committee is held monthly and is chaired by the Market Risk Director. Attendees include the Risk Director, respective business risk managers and senior managers from the central market risk team.

In Barclays Capital, the Head of Market Risk is responsible for implementing the market risk control framework. Day to day responsibility for market risk lies with the senior management of Barclays Capital, supported by the Market Risk Management team that operates independently of the trading areas. Daily market risk reports are produced for the main Barclays Capital business areas covering the different risk categories including interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity and foreign exchange. A more detailed trading market risk presentation is produced fortnightly and discussed at the Barclays Capital Traded Products Risk Review meeting. The attendees at this meeting include senior managers from Barclays Capital and the central market risk team.

Outside Barclays Capital, Global Retail and Commercial Banking is responsible for the non-structural interest rate risk in the banking book and Group Treasury is responsible for structural risk (interest rate and FX). The chart below right gives an overview of the business control structure.


86

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Traded market risk

Barclays policy is to concentrate trading activities in Barclays Capital. This includes transactions where Barclays Capital acts as principal with clients or with the market. For maximum efficiency, Barclays manages client and market activities together. In Barclays Capital, trading risk occurs in both the trading book and the banking book as defined for regulatory purposes.

In anticipation of future customer demand, Barclays maintains access to market liquidity by quoting bid and offer prices with other market makers and carries an inventory of capital market and treasury instruments, including a broad range of cash, securities and derivatives. Derivatives entered into for trading purposes include swaps, forward rate agreements, futures, credit derivatives, options and combinations of these instruments. For a description of the nature of derivative instruments, see page 89.

Traded market risk measurement

The measurement techniques used to measure and control traded market risk include Daily Value at Risk and Stress Testing.

Daily Value at Risk (DVaR) is an estimate of the potential loss which might arise from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day, measured to a confidence level of 98%. Daily losses exceeding the DVaR figure are likely to occur, on average, twice in every 100 business days.

DVaR uses the historical simulation method with a historic sample of two years. The credit spread calculation takes into account specific risks associated with different business names.

There are a number of considerations that should be taken into account when reviewing DVaR numbers. These are:

historical simulation assumes that the past is a good representation of the future which may not always be the case.

the assumed one day time horizon will not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be closed out or hedged within one day.

DVaR does not indicate the potential loss beyond the 98th percentile.

To complement DVaR, stress testing is performed and there is a large set of non-DVaR limits including foreign exchange concentration limits and interest rate delta limits.

DVaR is an important market risk measurement and control tool and consequently the model is regularly assessed. The main approach employed is the technique known asback-testing which counts the number of days when trading losses exceed the corresponding DVaR estimate.

On the basis of DVaR estimated to a 98% confidence level, on average there would be five days each year when trading losses would be expected to exceed DVaR and would therefore be reflected as back-testing exceptions. For Barclays Capital’s trading book, there were seven instances of a daily trading loss exceeding the corresponding 98% back-testing DVaR. These back-testing exceptions in 2007 reflected the increased volatility across a number of markets in which Barclays Capital operates. There were no instances of back-testing exceptions on a similar basis in 2006.

Stress testing provides an indication of the potential size of losses that could arise in extreme conditions. The three main types of stress test are:

risk factor: historical stress moves are applied to each of the risk categories which include interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity and foreign exchange rate

emerging market contagion: historical stress moves combined with contagion factors are applied to the emerging markets portfolio

scenario: stress scenarios are applied to the trading book

Stress results are produced at least fortnightly and are included in the Traded Products Risk Review meeting information pack. If a potential stress loss exceeds the corresponding trigger limit, the positions captured by the stress test are reviewed and discussed by Barclays Capital market risk and the respective Barclays Capital Business Head(s). The minutes of the discussion, including the merits of the position and the appropriate course of action, are then sent to the Market Risk Director for review.


LOGO

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

87


Risk management

Market risk management

Analysis of traded market risk exposures

The analysis of traded market risk exposures is given in Note 46.

Analysis of trading revenue

The histograms show the distribution of daily trading revenue for Barclays Capital in 2007 and 2006. Revenue includes net trading income, net interest income and net fees and commissions relating to primary trading. The average daily revenue in 2007 was £26.2m (2006: £22.0m) and there were 224 positive revenue days out of 253 (2006: 243 out of 252). The number of negative revenue days increased in 2007 largely as a result of volatile markets in the second half of the year. The number of large positive revenue days also increased but these were spread across the year.

Interest rate risk in the banking book

Interest rate risk arises from the provision of retail and wholesale (non-traded) banking products and services, as well as structural exposures within Barclays balance sheet.

The management approach of Barclays with respect to interest rate risk is to transfer the risk from the businesses either into local treasuries or to Group Treasury using an internal transfer price or interest rate swap. The methodology used to transfer this risk depends on whether the product contains yield curve risk, basis risk or customer optionality. Limits exist to ensure no material risk is retained within any business or product area.

Once each business’s risk has been transferred, the treasuries manage any residual yield curve and basis risks subject to modest risk limits and other controls. Market risk is also taken in overseas treasuries, within these limits, to support and facilitate customer activity.

Risk measurement

The techniques used to measure and control interest rate risk in the banking book include Annual Earnings at Risk, Daily Value at Risk and Stress Testing.

Annual Earnings at Risk (AEaR) measures the sensitivity of net interest income (NII) over the next 12 months. It is calculated as the difference between the estimated income using the current yield curve and the lowest estimated income following a 50 basis points increase or decrease in interest rates.

Outside Barclays Capital, Barclays uses a simplified approach to calculateDVaR. It is used as a complementary tool to AEaR. Both AEaR and DVaR are supplemented by stress testing and a range of non-DVaR limits.

Stress testing is carried out by the business centres and is reviewed by senior management and business-level asset and liability committees. The stress testing is tailored to the business and typically incorporates scenario analysis and historical stress movements applied to respective portfolios.

Analysis of interest rate risk in the banking book exposures

The analysis of interest rate risk in the banking book is given in Note 46.

Other market risks

Barclays maintains a number of defined benefit pension schemes for past and current employees. The ability of the Pension Fund to meet the projected pension payments is maintained through investments and regular Bank contributions.Pension risk arises because: the estimated market value of the pension fund assets might decline; or their investment returns might reduce; or the estimated value of the pension liabilities might increase. In these circumstances, Barclays could be required or might choose to make extra contributions to the pension fund. Financial details of the pension fund are in Note 30.

Investment risk is the risk of financial volatility arising from changes in the market value of investments, principally occurring in Barclays insurance companies. These investments may comprise various liquid instruments, such as cash, bonds and listed equities, to cover future insurance liability flows, and may therefore give rise to a mismatch between the revaluation of assets and liabilities. It is Barclays policy to hedge such exposures in line with a defined risk appetite.

Barclays policy is for foreign exchange trading risk to be concentrated and managed in Barclays Capital. Some transactionforeign exchange riskexposure arises within the local treasury operations in Global Retail and Commercial Banking to support and facilitate client activity. This is minimised in accordance with modest risk limits and was not material as at end 2007. Other non-Barclays Capital foreign exchange exposure is covered in Note 46.

Asset management structural market risk arises where the fee and commission income earned by asset management products and businesses is affected by a change in market levels, primarily through the link between income and the value of assets under management. Where support agreements exist, the Group is exposed to the performance of the underlying asset. This exposure arises mainly within Barclays Global Investors, but also in Global Retail and Commercial Banking, and Barclays Wealth. It is Barclays policy that businesses monitor and report this risk against a defined risk appetite and regularly assess potential hedging strategies.


LOGO

88 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGORisk management

Credit risk management

Loans and advances

Risk Tendency

In 2008, Risk Tendency increased 58% (£1,355m) to £3,710m (31st December 2007: £2,355m), compared with 32% growth in the Group’s loans and advances balances. This was reflective of the higher credit risk profile, weakening credit conditions across our main businesses, and changing mix, as a consequence of planned growth, in a number of businesses and portfolios. Risk Tendency in 2008 also increased as a result of the weakening of Sterling against a number of other foreign currencies, including the US Dollar and the Euro.

UK Retail Banking Risk Tendency increased £50m to £520m (31st December 2007: £470m). This reflected a higher risk profile in the unsecured and secured loans portfolios, weakening UK credit conditions, and asset growth, primarily in the Home Finance portfolio.

Risk Tendency in Barclays Commercial Bank increased £95m to £400m (31st December 2007: £305m). This reflected the deteriorating UK corporate credit environment and asset growth.

Barclaycard Risk Tendency increased £520m to £1,475m (31st December 2007: £955m) primarily reflecting the inclusion of new business acquisitions (£260m) as well as asset growth, exchange rate movements, and the economic conditions in the US. Risk Tendency in the UK Cards portfolio remained stable as improvements in portfolio quality were offset by deterioration in the UK economic environment.

Risk Tendency at GRCB – Western Europe increased £135m to £270m (31st December 2007: £135m) principally reflecting weakening credit conditions across Europe, particularly in Spain, asset growth and movements in the Euro/Sterling exchange rate.

Risk Tendency at GRCB – Emerging Markets increased £210m to £350m (31st December 2007: £140m) reflecting weakening credit conditions across the majority of regions, a change in the risk profile following a broadening of the product offering through new product launches and new market entry in India and UAE, and asset growth.

Risk Tendency at GRCB – Absa increased £65m to £255m (31st December 2007: £190m) reflecting weakening retail and, to a lesser extent, corporate credit conditions in South Africa and asset growth and movements in the Rand/Sterling exchange rate.

Risk Tendency in Barclays Capital increased £275m to £415m (31st December 2007: £140m) reflecting credit downgrades and asset growth. The drawn liquidity facilities on ABS CDO Super Senior positions are classified as credit risk loans and therefore no Risk Tendency is calculated on them.

Risk Tendency at Barclays Wealth increased £10m to £20m (31st December 2007: £10m) reflecting a weakening credit risk profile and asset growth.


LOGO

Notes

aExcludes ABS CDO Super Senior positions as these are classified as credit risk loans and therefore no Risk Tendency is calculated on them.

bHead office functions and other operations comprise discontinued businesses in transition.
.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

89


Risk management

Credit risk management

Debt securities and other bills

The following table presents an analysis of the credit quality of debt and similar securities, other than loans held within the Group. Securities rated as investment grade amounted to 91.6% of the portfolio (2007: 88.0%).

 

As at 31.12.08  Treasury
and other
eligible bills
£m
  Debt
securities
£m
  

Total

£m

  %
AAA to BBB– (investment grade)  7,314  198,493  205,807  91.6
BB+ to B  1,233  15,309  16,542  7.4
B– or lower    2,343  2,343  1.0
Total  8,547  216,145  224,692  100.0
Of which issued by:        
– governments and other public bodies  8,547  73,881  82,428  36.7
– US agency    34,180  34,180  15.3
– mortgage and asset-backed securities    34,844  34,844  15.5
– corporate and other issuers    55,244  55,244  24.6
– bank and building society certificates of deposit    17,996  17,996  7.9
Total  8,547  216,145  224,692  100.0
Of which classified as:        
– trading portfolio assets  4,544  148,686  153,230  68.2
– financial instruments designated at fair value    8,628  8,628  3.8
– available-for-sale securities  4,003  58,831  62,834  28.0
Total  8,547  216,145  224,692  100.0
As at 31.12.07  Treasury
and other
eligible bills
£m
  Debt
securities
£m
  

Total

£m

  %
AAA to BBB– (investment grade)  4,114  189,794  193,908  88.0
BB+ to B  703  24,693  25,396  11.5
B– or lower    1,181  1,181  0.5
Total  4,817  215,668  220,485  100.0
Of which issued by:        
– governments and other public bodies  4,817  63,798  68,615  31.1
– US agency    13,956  13,956  6.3
– mortgage and asset-backed securities    28,928  28,928  13.1
– corporate and other issuers    88,207  88,207  40.0
– bank and building society certificates of deposit    20,779  20,779  9.5
Total  4,817  215,668  220,485  100.0
Of which classified as:        
– trading portfolio assets  2,094  152,778  154,872  70.2
– financial instruments designated at fair value    24,217  24,217  11.0
– available-for-sale securities  2,723  38,673  41,396  18.8
Total  4,817  215,668  220,485  100.0

90

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Derivatives

 

Derivatives

The use of derivatives and their sale to customers as risk management products are an integral part of the Group’s trading activities. These instruments are also used to manage the Group’s own exposure to fluctuations in interest, exchange rates and commodity and equity prices as part of its asset and liability management activities.

Barclays Capital manages the trading derivatives book as part of the market risk book. This includes foreign exchange, interest rate, equity, commodity and credit derivatives. The policies regarding market risk management are outlined in the market risk management section on pages 86 to 88.

The policies for derivatives that are used to manage the Group’s own exposure to interest and exchange rate fluctuations are outlined in the asset and liability market risk section on page 223.106-110.

Derivative instruments are contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial instruments or indices defined in the contract. They include swaps, forward rate agreements, futures, options and combinations of these instruments and primarily affect the Group’s net interest income, net trading income, net fee and commission income and derivative assets and liabilities. Notional amounts of the contracts are not recorded on the balance sheet.

The Group participates both in exchange traded and over the counter derivatives markets.

Exchange traded derivatives

The Group buys and sells financial instruments that are traded or cleared on an exchange, including interest rate swaps, futures and options on futures. Holders of exchange traded instruments provide margin daily with cash or other security at the exchange, to which the holders look for ultimate settlement.

Over the counter traded derivatives

The Group also buys and sells financial instruments that are traded over the counter, rather than on a recognised exchange.

These instruments range from commoditised transactions in derivative markets, to trades where the specific terms are tailored to the requirements of the Group’s customers. In many cases, industry standard documentation is used, most commonly in the form of a master agreement, with individual transaction confirmations. The existence of a signed master agreement is intended to give the Group protection in situations where a counterparty is in default.

Foreign exchange derivatives

The Group’s principal exchange rate related contracts are forward foreign exchange contracts, currency swaps and currency options. Forward foreign exchange contracts are agreements to buy or sell a specified quantity of foreign currency, usually on a specified future date at an agreed rate. A currency swap generally involves the exchange, or notional exchange, of equivalent amounts of two currencies and a commitment to exchange interest periodically until the principal amounts are re-exchanged on a future date.

Currency options provide the buyer with the right, but not the obligation, either to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a currency at a specified exchange rate on or before a future date. As compensation for assuming the option risk, the option writer generally receives a premium at the start of the option period.

 

Interest rate derivatives

The Group’s principal interest rate related contracts are interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements, basis swaps, caps, floors and swaptions. Included in this product category are transactions that include combinations of these features.

An interest rate swap is an agreement between two parties to exchange fixed rate and floating rate interest by means of periodic payments based upon a notional principal amount and the interest rates defined in the contract. Certain agreements combine interest rate and foreign currency swap transactions, which may or may not include the exchange of principal amounts. A basis swap is a form of interest rate swap, in which both parties exchange interest payments based on floating rates, where the floating rates are based upon different underlying reference indices. In a forward rate agreement, two parties agree a future settlement of the difference between an agreed rate and a future interest rate, applied to a notional principal amount. The settlement, which generally occurs at the start of the contract period, is the discounted present value of the payment that would otherwise be made at the end of that period.

Credit derivatives

The Group’s principal credit derivative-related contracts include credit default swaps and total return swaps. A credit derivative is an arrangement whereby the credit risk of an asset (the reference asset) is transferred from the buyer to the seller of protection.

A credit default swap is a contract where the protection seller receives premium or interest-related payments in return for contracting to make payments to the protection buyer upon a defined credit event. Credit events normally include bankruptcy, payment default on a reference asset or assets, or downgrades by a rating agency.

A total return swap is an instrument whereby the seller of protection receives the full return of the asset, including both the income and change in the capital value of the asset. The buyer in return receives a predetermined amount.

Equity derivatives

The Group’s principal equity-related contracts are equity and stock index swaps and options (including warrants, which are equity options listed on an exchange). An equity swap is an agreement between two parties to exchange periodic payments, based upon a notional principal amount, with one side paying fixed or floating interest and the other side paying based on the actual return of the stock or stock index. An equity option provides the buyer with the right, but not the obligation, either to purchase or sell a specified stock, basket of stocks or stock index at a specified price or level on or before a specified date. The Group also enters into fund-linked derivatives, being swaps and options whose underlyings include mutual funds, hedge funds, indices and multi-asset portfolios.

Commodity derivatives

The Group’s principal commodity-related derivative contracts are swaps, options, forwards and futures. The main commodities transacted are base metals, precious metals, oil and oil-related products, power and natural gas.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 8991


LOGO

The tables below set out the fair values of the derivative assets together with the value of those assets subject to enforceable counterparty netting arrangements for which the Group holds offsetting liabilities and eligible collateral.

Derivative assets – As at 31.12.08  

Gross

assets

£m

  

Counterparty
netting

£m

  Net
exposure
£m
Foreign exchange  107,730  91,572  16,158
Interest rate  615,321  558,985  56,336
Credit derivatives  184,072  155,599  28,473
Equity and stock index  28,684  20,110  8,574
Commodity derivatives  48,995  35,903  13,092
   984,802  862,169  122,633
Total collateral held        54,905
Net exposure less collateral        67,728
Derivative assets – As at 31.12.07  Gross
assets
£m
  

Counterparty
netting

£m

  

Net

exposure
£m

Foreign exchange  30,824  22,066  8,758
Interest rate  140,504  117,292  23,212
Credit derivatives  38,696  31,307  7,389
Equity and stock index  13,296  12,151  1,145
Commodity derivatives  24,768  15,969  8,799
   248,088  198,785  49,303
Total collateral held        16,700
Net exposure less collateral        32,603

Gross derivative assets of £985bn (2007: £248bn) cannot be netted down under IFRS. Derivative assets would be £917bn (2007: £215bn) lower than reported under IFRS if counterparty or collateral netting were allowed.

Exposure relating to derivatives, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, stock borrowing and loan transactions is calculated using internal, FSA approved models. These are used as the basis to assess both regulatory capital and capital appetite and are managed on a daily basis. The methodology encompasses all relevant factors to enable the current value to be calculated and the future value to be estimated, for example: current market rates, market volatility and legal documentation (including collateral rights).

92

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures primarily relate to US residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and leveraged finance businesses that have been significantly impacted by the continued deterioration in the global credit markets. The exposures include both significant positions subject to fair value movements in the profit and loss account and positions that are classified as loans and advances and available for sale. None of the exposure disclosed below has been reclassified to loans and advances under the amendments to IAS 39.

The exposures are set out by asset class in US Dollars and Sterling below:

        $ma  

£ma

US Residential Mortgages  Notes  As at
31.12.08
  As at
31.12.07
  As at
31.12 .08
  As at
31.12.07
ABS CDO Super Senior  A1  4,526  9,356  3,104  4,671
Other US sub- prime  A2  5,017  10,089  3,441  5,037
Alt-A  A3  6,252  9,847  4,288  4,916
US RMBS exposure wrapped by monoline insurers  A4  2,389  1,462  1,639  730
Commercial mortgages               
Commercial real estate  B1  16,882  22,239  11,578  11,103
Commercial mortgage-backed securities  B1  1,072  2,596  735  1,296
CMBS exposure wrapped by monoline insurers  B2  2,703  395  1,854  197
Other Credit Market Exposures               
Leveraged financeb  C1  15,152  18,081  10,391  9,027
SIVs and SIV-Lites  C2  1,404  1,570  963  784
CDPCs  C3  218  39  150  19
CLO and other exposure wrapped by monoline insurers  C4  7,202  817  4,939  408

These exposures have been actively managed during the year in an exceptionally challenging market environment and have been reduced by net sales and paydowns of £6,311m, offset by the 37% appreciation of the US Dollar against Sterling. In January 2009, there was an additional sale of £3,056m of leveraged finance exposure which was repaid at par. Exposures at 31st December 2008 included £1,060m of securities from the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses. Exposures wrapped by monolines have increased during the course of 2008 as a result of declines in the fair value of the underlying assets.

Analysis of Barclays Capital credit market exposures by asset class

    ABS
CDO
Super
Senior
£m
  Other US
sub -prime
£m
  Alt-A
£m
  

RMBS
Wrapped by
Monoline
insurers

£m

  

Commercial
real estate
loans

£m

  Commercial
mortgage
backed
securities
£m
  CMBS
wrapped by
monoline
insurers
£m
  Leveraged
finance
£m
  SIVs and
SIV-Lites
£m
  CDPCs
£m
  CLO and
other
exposure
wrapped by
monoline
insurers
£m
  As at
31.12.08
£m
Debt securities     782  2,532        1,420        11        4,745
Trading portfolio assets    782  2,532      1,420      11      4,745
Loans and advances     1,565  778     11,555           531        14,429
Financial assets designated at fair value     1,565  778     11,555           531        14,429
Derivative financial instruments     643  398  1,639  23  (685) 1,854     273  150  4,939  9,234
Loans and advances to customers  3,104  195           9,361  148      12,808
Debt securities     147  580                          727
Available for sale financial instruments     147  580                          727
Other assets     109                             109
Exposure on balance sheet  3,104  3,441  4,288  1,639  11,578  735  1,854  9,361  963  150  4,939   

Notes

aAs the majority of exposure is held in US Dollars the exposures above are shown in both US Dollars and Sterling .

bIncluded within the total leveraged finance exposure of £10,391m is £1,030m of off-balance sheet commitments.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

93


LOGO

There were gross losses of £8,053m (2007: £2,999m) in the year to 31st December 2008. These losses were partially offset by related income and hedges of £1,433m (2007: £706m), and gains of £1,663m (2007: £658m) from the general widening of credit spreads on issued notes measured at fair value through the profit and loss account.

The gross losses, which included £1,763m (2007: £782m) in impairment charges, comprised: £5,584m (2007: £2,811m) against US RMBS exposures; £1,488m (2007: £14m) against commercial mortgage exposures; and £981m (2007: £174m) against other credit market exposures.

    

 

Fair Value
Losses
£m

  

 

Impairment
Charge

£m

  

 

Gross
Losses
£m

 

ABS CDO super senior

  (78) (1,383) (1,461)

Other US sub-prime

  (1,560) (168) (1,728)

Alt-A

  (1,858) (125) (1,983)

US RMBS wrapped by monoline insurers

  (412)   (412)

Total US residential mortgages

  (3,908) (1,676) (5,584)

US

  (671)   (671)

Europe

  (350)   (350)

Total commercial real estate

  (1,021)   (1,021)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

  (127)   (127)

CMBS wrapped by monoline insurers

  (340)   (340)

Total commercial mortgages

  (1,488)   (1,488)

SIVs and SIV-Lites

  (143) (87) (230)

CDPCs

  (14)   (14)

CLO and other assets wrapped by monoline insurers

  (737)   (737)

Total other credit market

  (894) (87) (981)

Total

  (6,290) (1,763) (8,053)

94

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

A. US Residential Mortgages

US residential mortgage exposures have reduced by 41% in US Dollar terms, and 19% in Sterling terms, since 31st December 2007.

A1. ABS CDO Super Senior

During the year ABS CDO Super Senior exposures reduced by £1,567m to £3,104m (31st December 2007: £4,671m). Net exposures are stated after write-downs and charges of £1,461m incurred in 2008 (2007: £1,816m) and hedges of £nil (31st December 2007: £1,347m). There were no hedges in place at 31st December 2008 as the corresponding liquidity facilities had been terminated. There were liquidations and paydowns of £2,318m in the year; weaker Sterling and a reduction in hedges increased exposure by £865m and £1,347m respectively.

The remaining ABS CDO Super Senior exposure at 31st December 2008 comprised five high grade liquidity facilities which were fully drawn and classified within loans and receivables, and no remaining mezzanine exposure. At 31st December 2007 there were 15 facilities of which nine were high grade and six mezzanine.

The impairment assessment of remaining super senior positions is based on cash flow methodology using standard market assumptions such as default curves and remittance data to calculate the net present value of the future losses for the collateral pool over time. As a result, future potential impairment charges depend on changes in these assumptions.

We have included all ABS CDO Super Senior exposure in the US residential mortgages section as nearly 90% of the underlying collateral relates to US RMBS. The impairment applied to the notional collateral is set out in the table below.

    

 

As at

31.12.08

  

 

As at

31.12.07

  

 

As at
31.12.08

  

 

As at
31.12.07

    High Grade
£m
  Total
£m
  High Grade
£m
  Mezzanine
£m
  Total
£m
  Marksa  Marksa

2005 and earlier

  1,226  1,226  1,458  1,152  2,610  90%  69%

2006

  471  471  1,654  314  1,968  37%  47%

2007 and 2008

  25  25  176  87  263  69%  53%

Sub-prime

  1,722  1,722  3,288  1,553  4,841  75%  60%

2005 and earlier

  891  891  714  102  816  77%  96%

2006

  269  269  594  68  662  75%  90%

2007 and 2008

  62  62  163  13  176  37%  80%

Alt-A

  1,222  1,222  1,471  183  1,654  74%  92%

Prime

  520  520  662  123  785  100%  100%

RMBS CDO

  402  402  842  445  1,287    19%

Sub-prime second lien

  127  127  158    158    32%

Total RMBS

  3,993  3,993  6,421  2,304  8,725  68%  63%

CMBS

  44  44  189  110  299  100%  96%

Non-RMBS CDO

  453  453  429  80  509  56%  49%

CLOs

  35  35  26    26  100%  100%

Other ABS

  51  51  136  4  140  100%  100%

Total other ABS

  583  583  780  194  974  66%  72%

Total notional collateral

  4,576  4,576  7,201  2,498  9,699  68%  64%

Subordination

  (459) (459) (1,001) (864) (1,865)     

Gross exposure pre impairment

  4,117  4,117  6,200  1,634  7,834    

Impairment allowances

  (1,013) (1,013) (290) (432) (722)   

Trading losses gross of Hedges

      (1,041) (53) (1,094)   

Hedges

      (960) (387) (1,347)   

Net exposure

  3,104  3,104  3,909  762  4,671      

Collateral marks including liquidated structures

                 32%  62%

Note

aMarks above reflect the gross exposure after the impairment and subordination and do not include the benefit of hedges. The change in marks since 31st December 2007 primarily results from the liquidation during 2008 of the most impaired structures.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

95


LOGO

Consolidated collateral of £8.4bn relating to the ten CDOs that were liquidated in 2008 has been sold or are stated at fair value net of hedges within Other US sub-prime, Alt-A and CMBS exposures. The notional collateral remaining at 31st December 2008 is marked at approximately 12%. The collateral valuation for all ABS CDO Super Senior deals, including those liquidated and consolidated in 2008, is approximately 32% (31st December 2007: 62%).

The collateral for the outstanding ABS CDO Super Senior exposures primarily comprises residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS). At 31st December 2008 the residual exposure contains a higher proportion of collateral originated in 2005 and earlier than at 31st December 2007. There is minimal exposure to collateral originated in 2007 or later. The vintages of the sub-prime, Alt-A and US RMBS collateral are set out in the table below.

    

 

As at
31.12.08

  

 

As at
31.12.07

Sub-prime Collateral by Vintage

      

2005 and earlier

  71%  54%

2006

  27%  41%

2007 and 2008

  2%  5%

Alt-A Collateral by Vintage

      

2005 and earlier

  73%  49%

2006

  22%  40%

2007 and 2008

  5%  11%

US RMBS Collateral by Vintage

      

2005 and earlier

  72%  53%

2006

  25%  40%

2007 and 2008

  3%  7%

RMBS collateral for the ABS CDO Super Senior exposures is subject to public ratings. The ratings of sub-prime, Alt-A and total US RMBS CDO collateral are set out in the table below.

    

 

31.12.08
High Grade

  

 

31.12.07
High Grade

  

 

31.12.07
Mezzanine

  

 

31.12.07
Total

Sub-prime US RMBS Ratings

            

AAA/AA

  42%  43%  2%  30%

A/BBB

  21%  51%  82%  60%

Non-investment Grade

  37%  6%  16%  10%

Alt-A RMBS Ratings

            

AAA/AA

  66%  89%  47%  85%

A/BBB

  7%  8%  45%  12%

Non-investment Grade

  27%  3%  8%  3%

Total US RMBS Ratings

            

AAA/AA

  50%  63%  14%  50%

A/BBB

  13%  31%  70%  41%

Non-investment Grade

  37%  6%  16%  9%

96

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

A2. Other US Sub-Prime

    

 

As at
31.12.08
£m

  

 

As at
31.12.07
£m

  

 

Marks at

31.12.08

  

 

Marks at
31.12.07

       

Whole loans – performing

  1,290  2,805  80%  100%

Whole loans – more than 60 days past due

  275  372  48%  65%

Total whole loans

  1,565  3,177  72%  94%

AAA securities

  111  735  40%  92%

Other sub-prime securities

  818  525  23%  61%

Total securities gross of hedges

  929  1,260  25%  76%

Hedges

    (369)     

Securities (net of hedges)

  929  891    

Residuals

    233    24%

Other exposures with underlying sub-prime collateral:

       

– Derivatives

  643  333  87%  100%

– Loans

  195  346  70%  100%

– Real Estate

  109  57  46%  68%

Total other direct and indirect exposure

  1,876  1,860      

Total

  3,441  5,037      

The majority of Other US sub-prime exposures are measured at fair value through profit and loss. US sub-prime securities held in conduits and a collateralised debt obligation (CDO) are categorised as available for sale and are recognised in equity.

Exposure declined from £5,037m to £3,441m driven by gross losses of £1,728m and net sales, paydowns and other movements of £1,649m. Weaker Sterling resulted in an increase in exposure of £1,086m. Exposures at 31st December 2008 included assets acquired from Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £83m in AAA securities and £124m in other US sub-prime securities.

At 31st December 2008, 82% of the whole loan exposure was performing. Whole loans included £1,422m (31st December 2007: £2,843m) acquired on or originated since the acquisition of EquiFirst in March 2007. Of this balance, £281m of new sub-prime loans were originated in 2008. At 31st December 2008, the average loan to value at origination of all the sub-prime whole loans was 79%. Loans guaranteed by Federal Housing Administration (FHA) are not included in the exposure above. An FHA loan is a mortgage loan fully insured by the US Federal Housing Administration and therefore not considered to be a credit sensitive product. EquiFirst has only originated FHA eligible loans since April 2008, and held £132m of these loans at 31st December 2008.

Securities included £37m held by consolidated conduits and £110m held in a CDO on which impairment charges of £16m and £53m respectively have been recorded.

Other exposures with underlying sub-prime collateral include counterparty derivative exposures to vehicles which hold sub-prime collateral. Derivatives of £643m (31st December 2007: £333m) relate to US Dollar denominated interest rate swaps. The increase in the balance principally relates to the decline in interest rates globally and the 37% depreciation of Sterling relative to the US Dollar, especially in the second half of 2008. The majority of all other exposures with underlying sub-prime collateral was the most senior obligation of the vehicle.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

97


LOGO

A3. Alt-A

    

 

As at
31.12.08
£m

  

 

As at
31.12.07
£m

  

 

Marks at
31.12.08

  

 

Marks at
31.12.07

AAA securities

  1,847  3,553  43%  87%

Other Alt-A securities

  1,265  208  9%  75%

Whole Loans

  776  909  67%  97%

Residuals

  2  25  6%  66%

Derivative exposure with underlying Alt-A collateral

  398  221  100%  100%

Total

  4,288  4,916      

Alt-A securities, whole loans and residuals are measured at fair value through profit and loss. Alt-A securities held in conduits and a collateralised debt obligation (CDO) are categorised as available for sale and are recognised in equity.

Net exposure to the Alt-A market was £4,288m (31st December 2007: £4,916m), through a combination of whole loans, securities and residuals, including those held in consolidated conduits. There were gross losses of £1,983m in the year and net sales, paydowns and other movements of £181m. Weaker Sterling resulted in an increase in exposure of £1,190m. Exposures at 31st December 2008 included assets acquired from Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £300m in AAA securities and £324m in other Alt-A securities.

Securities included £491m held by consolidated conduits and £89m held in a CDO on which impairment charges of £65m and £58m respectively have been recorded.

At 31st December 2008, 75% of the Alt-A whole loan exposure was performing, and the average loan to value ratio at origination was 81%.

Other exposures with underlying Alt-A collateral include counterparty derivative exposures to vehicles which hold Alt-A collateral. Derivative exposures with underlying Alt-A collateral of £398m (31st December 2007: £221m) relate to US Dollar denominated interest rate swaps. The increase in the balance principally relates to the decline in interest rates globally and the 37% depreciation of Sterling relative to the US Dollar, especially in the second half of 2008. The majority of this exposure was the most senior obligation of the vehicle.

A4. US Residential Mortgage Backed Securities Exposure Wrapped by Monoline Insurers

The deterioration in the US residential mortgage market has resulted in exposure to monoline insurers and other financial guarantors that provide credit protection.

The table below shows RMBS assets where we held protection from monoline insurers at 31st December 2008. These are measured at fair value through profit and loss. Declines in fair value of the underlying assets are reflected in increases in the value of potential claims against monoline insurers. Such declines have resulted in net exposure to monoline insurers under these contracts increasing to £1,639m by 31st December 2008 (2007: £730m).

Claims would become due in the event of default of the underlying assets and losses would only be realised if both the underlying asset and monoline defaulted. At 31st December 2008 while 81% of the underlying assets were non-investment grade, 97% are wrapped by monolines with investment grade ratings.

There is some uncertainty whether all of the monoline insurers would be able to meet all liabilities if such claims were to arise: certain monoline insurers have been subject to downgrades in 2008. Consequently, a fair value loss of £412m has been recognised in the year. There have been no claims due under these contracts as none of the underlying assets were in default at 31st December 2008.

The fair value is determined by a credit valuation adjustment calculation which incorporates stressed cash flow shortfall projections, current market valuations, stressed Probability of Default (PDs) and a range of Loss Given Default (LGD) assumptions. The cash flow shortfall projections are stressed to ensure that we consider the potential for further market deterioration and resultant additional cash flow shortfall in underlying collateral. Monoline ratings are based on external ratings analysis and where appropriate significant internal analysis conducted by the independent Credit Risk function. In addition, we reflect the potential for further deterioration of monolines by using stressed PDs which results in all monolines having an implied sub-investment grade rating. LGDs range from 45% to 100% depending on the monoline.

Exposure by Credit Rating of Monoline Insurer

    As at 31.12.08
    Notional
£m
  

Fair Value
of Underlying
Asset

£m

  Fair Value
Exposure
£m
  Credit
Valuation
Adjustment
£m
  Net
Exposure
£m

AAA/AA

          

A/BBB

  2,567  492  2,075  (473) 1,602

Non-investment grade

  74  8  66  (29) 37

Total

  2,641  500  2,141  (502) 1,639
    As at 31.12.07

AAA/AA

  2,807  2,036  771  (41) 730

98

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

The notional value of the assets, split by the current rating of the monoline insurer, is shown below.

    

 

Rating of Monoline Insurers – As at 31.12.08

    AAA/AA
£m
  A/BBB
£m
  

Non-
Investment
Grade

£m

  Total
£m

2005 and earlier

    143    143

2006

    1,240    1,240

2007 and 2008

    510    510

High Grade

    1,893    1,893

Mezzanine – 2005 and earlier

    625  74  699

CDO2– 2005 and earlier

    49    49

US RMBS

    2,567  74  2,641

 

The notional value of the assets, split by the current rating of the underlying asset, is shown below.

 

    

 

Rating of Underlying Asset – As at 31.12.08

    AAA/AA
£m
  A/BBB
£m
  

Non-
Investment
Grade

£m

  Total
£m

2005 and earlier

  143      143

2006

      1,240  1,240

2007 and 2008

      510  510

High Grade

  143    1,750  1,893

Mezzanine – 2005 and earlier

  31  330  338  699

CDO2– 2005 and earlier

      49  49

US RMBS

  174  330  2,137  2,641

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

99


LOGO

B. Commercial Mortgages

Commercial mortgages reduced 18% in US Dollar terms. In Sterling terms these increased by 12%.

B1. Commercial Mortgages

Exposures in Barclays Capital’s commercial mortgages portfolio, all of which are measured at fair value, comprised commercial real estate loan exposure of £11,578m (31st December 2007: £11,103m) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) of £735m (31st December 2007: £1,296m). During the year there were gross losses of £1,148m. Gross sales and paydowns of £1,034m in the UK and Continental Europe and £2,167m in the US were partially offset by additional drawdowns. Weaker Sterling increased exposure by £3,058m.

The commercial real estate loan exposure comprised 55% US, 41% UK and Europe and 4% Asia. 5% of the total relates to land or property under construction.

The US exposure included two large transactions which comprised 42% of the total US exposure and have paid down approximately £789m in the year. The remaining 58% of the US exposure comprised 76 transactions. The remaining weighted average number of years to initial maturity of the US portfolio is 1.4 years.

The UK and Europe portfolio is well diversified with 64 transactions in place as at 31st December 2008. In Europe protection is provided by loan covenants and periodic LTV retests, which cover 90% of the portfolio. 47% of the German exposure relates to one transaction secured on multifamily residential assets. Exposure to the Spanish market represents less than 1% of global exposure at 31st December 2008.

Commercial Real Estate Exposure by Region

 

    As at
31.12.08
£m
  As at
31.12.07
£m
  Marks at
31.12.08
  Marks at
31.12.07

US

  6,329  5,947  88%  99%

Germany

  2,467  1,783  95%  100%

Sweden

  265  250  96%  100%

France

  270  289  94%  100%

Switzerland

  176  127  97%  100%

Spain

  106  89  92%  100%

Other Continental Europe

  677  779  90%  100%

UK

  831  1,422  89%  100%

Asia

  457  417  97%  100%

Total

  11,578  11,103      

Commercial Real Estate Exposure Metrics

WALTVaWAMbWALAc

US

79.5%1.4 yrs1.6 yrs

Germany

79.4%4.6 yrs1.5 yrs

Other Europe

82.2%4.5 yrs1.7 yrs

UK

77.8%5.8 yrs1.8 yrs

Asia

93.3%4.7 yrs1.3 yrs

Commercial Real Estate Exposure by Industry

 

    As at 31.12.08
    

US

£m

  Germany
£m
  Other
Europe
£m
  UK
£m
  Asia
£m
  Total
£m

Office

  2,081  436  802  192  145  3,656

Residential

  1,957  1,268    229  128  3,582

Retail

  66  567  96  110  118  957

Hotels

  1,145    441  29  18  1,633

Leisure

        233    233

Land

  232          232

Industrial

  582  126  131  38  10  887

Mixed/Others

  243  70  24    38  375

Hedges

  23          23

Total

  6,329  2,467  1,494  831  457  11,578

Notes

aWeighted-average loan- to-value based on the most recent valuation.

bWeighted-average number of years to initial maturity.

cWeighted-average loan age.

100

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

B1. Commercial Mortgages (continued)

 

Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (net of hedges)

 

    As at
31.12.08
£m
  

As at
31.12.07

£m

  Marksa at
31.12.08
  Marksa at
31.12.07

AAA securities

  588  1,008    

Other securities

  147  288    

Total

  735  1,296  21%  98%

Exposure is stated net of hedges traded in the liquid index swap market with market counterparties. The counterparty exposure is managed through a standard derivative collateralisation process and none of the hedge counterparties are monoline insurers.

Exposures at 31st December 2008 included assets acquired from Lehman Brothers North American businesses of £143m in AAA securities and £86m in other securities.

B2. CMBS Exposure Wrapped by Monoline Insurers

The deterioration in the commercial mortgage market has resulted in exposure to monoline insurers and other financial guarantors that provide credit protection.

The table below shows Commercial Mortgage Backed Security (CMBS) assets where we held protection from monoline insurers at 31st December 2008. These are measured at fair value through profit and loss. Declines in fair value of the underlying assets are reflected in increases in the value of potential claims against monoline insurers. Such declines have resulted in net exposure to monoline insurers under these contracts increasing to £1,854m by 31st December 2008 (31st December 2007: £197m).

Claims would become due in the event of default of the underlying assets and losses would only be realised if both the underlying asset and monoline defaulted. At 31st December 2008 all underlying assets were rated AAA/AA and 89% are wrapped by monolines with investment grade ratings.

There is some uncertainty whether all of the monoline insurers would be able to meet all liabilities if such claims were to arise: certain monoline insurers have been subject to downgrades in 2008. Consequently, a fair value loss of £340m has been recognised in the year. There have been no claims due under these contracts as none of the underlying assets were in default at 31st December 2008.

The fair value is determined by a credit valuation adjustment calculation which incorporates stressed cash flow shortfall projections, current market valuations, stressed Probability of Default (PDs) and a range of Loss Given Default (LGD) assumptions. The cash flow shortfall projections are stressed to ensure that we consider the potential for further market deterioration and resultant additional cash flow shortfall in underlying collateral. Monoline ratings are based on external ratings analysis and where appropriate significant internal analysis conducted by the independent Credit Risk function. In addition, we reflect the potential for further deterioration of monolines by using stressed PDs which results in all monolines having an implied sub-investment grade rating. LGDs range from 45% to 100% depending on the monoline.

 

Exposure by credit rating of monoline insurer

 

    As at 31.12.08
    Notional
£m
  

Fair value
of underlying
asset

£m

  Fair value
exposure
£m
  Credit
valuation
adjustment
£m
  Net
exposure
£m

AAA/AA

  69  27  42  (4) 38

A/BBB

  3,258  1,301  1,957  (320) 1,637

Non-investment grade

  425  181  244  (65) 179

Total

  3,752  1,509  2,243  (389) 1,854
   As at 31.12.07

AAA/AA

  3,614  3,408  206  (9) 197

The notional value of the assets, split by the current rating of the monoline insurer, is shown below.

    Rating of monoline insurers – As at 31.12.08
    AAA/AA
£m
  A/BBB
£m
  

Non-
Investment
Grade

£m

  Total
£m

2005 and earlier

    437    437

2006

  69  544    613

2007 and 2008

    2,277  425  2,702

CMBS

  69  3,258  425  3,752

Note

aMarks are based on gross collateral.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

101


LOGO

The notional value of the assets split by the current rating of the underlying asset, is shown below. All CMBS assets were rated AAA/AA at 31st December 2008.

    

 

Rating of Underlying Asset – As at 31.12.08

    AAA/AA
£m
  A/BBB
£m
  

Non-

Investment
Grade

£m

  Total
£m

2005 and earlier

  437      437

2006

  613      613

2007 and 2008

  2,702      2,702

CMBS

  3,752      3,752

C . Other credit market exposures

In the year ended 31st December 2008 these exposures increased by 17% in US Dollar terms, and 61% in Sterling terms.

C1. Leveraged Finance

Leveraged loans are classified within loans and advances and are stated at amortised cost less impairment. The overall credit performance of the assets remains satisfactory.

At 31st December 2008, the gross exposure relating to leveraged finance loans was £10,506m (31st December 2007: £9,217m). Barclays Capital expects to hold these leveraged finance positions until redemption. Material movements since 31st December 2007 reflect exchange rate changes rather than changes in loan positions.

The net exposure relating to leverage finance loans of £10,391m (31st December 2007: £9,027m) was reduced to £7,335m following a repayment of £3,056m at par in January 2009.

 

Leveraged Finance Exposure by Region

 

   
    As at
31.12.08
£m
  As at
31.12.07
£m
 

UK

  4,810  4,401 

US

  3,830  3,037 

Europe

  1,640  1,568 

Asia

  226  211 

Total lending and commitments

  10,506  9,217 

Identified and unidentified impairmenta

  (115) (190)

Net lending and commitments

  10,391  9,027 

 

Leveraged finance exposure by industry

 

            
   As at 31.12.08  As at 31.12.07
    Drawn
£m
  Undrawn
£m
  Total
£m
  Drawn
£m
  Undrawn
£m
  Total
£m

Insurance

  2,546  31  2,577  2,456  78  2,534

Telecoms

  2,998  211  3,209  2,259  240  2,499

Retail

  904  128  1,032  828  132  960

Health care

  659  144  803  577  141  718

Media

  655  89  744  469  127  596

Services

  568  131  699  388  134  522

Manufacturing

  500  102  602  371  125  496

Chemicals

  317  26  343  46  286  332

Other

  329  168  497  233  327  560

Total

  9,476  1,030  10,506  7,627  1,590  9,217

New leveraged finance commitments originated after 30th June 2007 comprised £573m (31st December 2007: £1,148m).

Note

aThe movement in impairment during the period is primarily due to the release of the provision on the post year end repayment, for which there was a binding commitment as at 31st December 2008.

102

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

C2. SIVs and SIV-Lites

SIVs/SIV-Lites

 

        
    As at
31.12.08
£m
  As at
31.12.07
£m
  Marks at
31.12.08
  Marks at
31.12.07

Liquidity facilities

  679  466  62%  100%

Bond inventory

  11  52  7%  37%

Derivatives

  273  266      

Total

  963  784      

SIV exposure increased from £784m to £963m during the year. There were £230m of gross losses against SIVs and SIV lites in the year. Weaker Sterling resulted in an increase in exposure of £281m.

At 31st December 2008 liquidity facilities of £679m (31st December 2007: £466m) include £531m designated at fair value through profit and loss relating to a SIV-lite which had previously been hedged with Lehman Brothers. Following the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy this facility was reflected as a new exposure to the underlying assets. The remaining £148m represented drawn liquidity facilities in respect of SIV-lites and other structured investment vehicles classified as loans and advances stated at cost less impairment.

Bond inventory and derivatives are fair valued through profit and loss.

Movement in derivative exposure primarily related to CDS exposure due to general spread widening. At 31st December 2008 exposure was broadly in line with the prior year.

C3. CDPC exposure

Credit derivative product companies (‘CDPCs’) are specialist providers of credit protection principally on corporate exposures in the form of credit derivatives. The Group has purchased protection from CDPCs against a number of securities with a notional value of £1,772m. The fair value of the exposure to CDPCs at 31st December 2008 was £150m. A fair value loss of £14m has been recognised in the year.

Of the notional exposure, 45% related to AAA/AA rated counterparties, with the remainder rated A/BBB.

Exposure by credit rating of CDPC

 

    As at 31.12.08
    Notional
£m
  Gross
exposure
£m
  Credit
valuation
adjustment
£m
  Net
exposure
£m

AAA/AA

  796  77  (14) 63

A/BBB

  976  87    87

Total

  1,772  164  (14) 150
   As at 31.12.07

AAA/AA

  1,262  19    19

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

103


LOGO

C4. CLO and other exposure wrapped by monoline insurers

The table below shows Collateralised Loan Obligations (CLOs) and other assets where we held protection from monoline insurers at 31st December 2008. The deterioration in markets for these assets has resulted in exposure to monoline insurers and other financial guarantors that provide credit protection. These are measured at fair value through profit and loss. Declines in fair value of the underlying assets are reflected in increases in the value of potential claims against monoline insurers. Such declines have resulted in net exposure to monoline insurers under these contracts increasing to £4,939m by 31st December 2008 (31st December 2007: £408m).

Claims would become due in the event of default of the underlying assets and losses would only be realised if both the underlying asset and monoline defaulted. At 31st December 2008 all of the underlying assets have investment grade ratings and 39% are wrapped by monolines rated AAA/AA. 87% of the underlying assets were CLOs, all of which were rated AAA/AA.

There is some uncertainty whether all of the monoline insurers would be able to meet all liabilities if such claims were to arise: certain monoline insurers have been subject to downgrades in 2008. Consequently, a fair value loss of £737m, has been recognised in the year. There have been no claims due under these contracts as none of the underlying assets were in default at 31st December 2008.

The fair value is determined by a credit valuation adjustment calculation which incorporates stressed cash flow shortfall projections, current market valuations, stressed Probability of Default (PDs) and a range of Loss Given Default (LGD) assumptions. The cash flow shortfall projections are stressed to ensure that we consider the potential for further market deterioration and resultant additional cash flow shortfall in underlying collateral. Monoline ratings are based on external ratings analysis and where appropriate significant internal analysis conducted by the independent Credit Risk function. In addition, we reflect the potential for further deterioration of monolines by using stressed PDs for non-AAA rated monolines, which results in all other monolines having an implied sub-investment grade rating. LGDs range from 45% to 100% depending on the monoline.

Exposure by credit rating of monoline in surer        
        As at 31.12.08
    Notional
£m
  

Fair value
of underlying
asset

£m

  Fair value
exposure
£m
  Credit
valuation
adjustment
£m
  Net
exposure
£m

AAA/AA

  8,281  5,854  2,427  (55) 2,372

A/BBB

  6,446  4,808  1,638  (204) 1,434

Non-investment grade

  6,148  4,441  1,707  (574) 1,133

Total

  20,875  15,103  5,772  (833) 4,939
      As at 31.12.07

AAA/AA

  15,152  14,735  417  (9) 408

The notional value of the assets, split by the current rating of the monoline insurer, is shown below.

 

        Rating of monoline insurers – As at 31.12.08
        

AAA/AA

£m

  A/BBB
£m
  

Non-
investment

grade

£m

  Total £m

2005 and earlier

    2,064  1,647  2,326  6,037

2006

    1,803  2,173  1,918  5,894

2007 and 2008

     3,324  1,369  1,602  6,295

CLOs

    7,191  5,189  5,846  18,226

2005 and earlier

    131  661  70  862

2006

    145  158  232  535

2007 and 2008

     814  438    1,252

Other

     1,090  1,257  302  2,649

Total

     8,281  6,446  6,148  20,875

104

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk Management

Credit risk management

Barclays Capital credit market exposures

The notional value of the assets split by the current rating of the underlying asset is shown below. All of the underlying assets had investment grade ratings as at 31st December 2008.

    Rating of Underlying Asset – As at 31.12. 08
    

AAA/AA

£m

  

A/BBB

£m

  

Non-

Investment
Grade

£m

  Total
£m

2005 and earlier

  6,037      6,037

2006

  5,894      5,894

2007 and 2008

  6,295      6,295

CLOs

  18,226      18,226

2005 and earlier

  862      862

2006

  535      535

2007 and 2008

  785  467    1,252

Other

  2,182  467    2,649

Total

  20,408  467    20,875

Own credit

The carrying amount of issued notes that are designated under the IAS 39 fair value option is adjusted to reflect the effect of changes in own credit spreads. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in the income statement.

At 31st December 2008, the own credit adjustment arose from the fair valuation of £54.5bn of Barclays Capital structured notes (31st December 2007: £40.7bn). The widening of Barclays credit spreads in the year affected the fair value of these notes and as a result revaluation gains of £1,663m were recognised in trading income (2007: £658m).

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

105


LOGO

Risk management

Market risk management

Organisation and structure

Market risk is the risk that Barclays earnings or capital, or its ability to meet business objectives, will be adversely affected by changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices such as interest rates, credit spreads, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign exchange rates. Market risk mainly arises from trading activities. Barclays is also exposed to market risk through non-traded interest rate risk and the pension fund.

Barclays market risk objectives are to:

– Understand and control market risk by robust measurement and the setting of position limits.

– Facilitate business growth within a controlled and transparent risk management framework.

– Ensure traded market risk resides primarily in Barclays Capital.

– Minimise non-traded market risk.

The Board approves market risk appetite for trading and non-trading activities. The Market Risk Director is responsible for the Market Risk Control Framework and, under delegated authority from the Group Risk Director, sets a limit framework within the context of the approved market risk appetite. A daily market risk report summarises Barclays market risk exposures against agreed limits. This daily report is sent to the Group Risk Director, the Market Risk Director, the Group Finance Director and the appropriate Business Risk Directors.

The head of each business, assisted by the business risk management team, is accountable for all market risks associated with its activities. Each business is responsible for the identification, measurement,

management, control and reporting of market risk as outlined in Barclays Market Risk Control Framework. Oversight and

support is provided to the business by the Market Risk Director, assisted by the central market risk team. The Market Risk Committee reviews, approves, and makes recommendations concerning the market risk profile across Barclays including risk appetite, limits and utilisation. The Committee meets monthly and is chaired by the Market Risk Director. Attendees include the Group Risk Director, respective business risk managers and senior managers from the central market risk team.

In Barclays Capital, the Head of Market Risk is responsible for implementing the market risk control framework. Day to day responsibility for market risk lies with the senior management of Barclays Capital, supported by the Market Risk Management team that operates independently of the trading areas. Daily market risk reports are produced for Barclays Capital as a whole as well as for the main business areas. The risks covered include interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity and foreign exchange. A more detailed trading market risk presentation is produced fortnightly and discussed at the Barclays Capital Traded Positions Risk Review meeting. The attendees at this meeting include the Group Risk Director and senior managers from Barclays Capital and the central market risk team.

In Global Retail and Commercial Banking, each of the six main business areas (UK Retail Banking, Barclays Commercial Bank, Barclaycard, Western Europe, Emerging Markets and Absa) has its own market risk department. The head of each department is responsible for implementing the Market Risk Control Framework, with oversight provided by the central market risk team. A combination of daily and monthly risk reports are sent to the central market risk team. A risk summary is presented at Market Risk Committee and the respective Asset and Liability Committees.

Global Retail and Commercial Banking is responsible for non-structural non-trading interest rate risk and Group Treasury is responsible for structural risk (interest rate and foreign exchange). The chart below gives an overview of the business control structure.


LOGO

106

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Market risk management

Traded market risk

Barclays policy is to concentrate trading activities in Barclays Capital. This includes transactions where Barclays Capital acts as principal with clients or with the market. For maximum efficiency, client and market activities are managed together. In Barclays Capital, trading risk occurs in both the trading book and the banking book, as defined for regulatory purposes.

Risk measurement and control

The measurement techniques used to measure and control traded market risk include Daily Value at Risk (DVaR), Expected Shortfall (ES), stress testing and scenario testing. Book limits such as foreign exchange and interest rate delta limits are also in place.

Daily Value at Risk is an estimate of the potential loss arising from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day. Barclays Capital uses the historical simulation method with a two year unweighted historical period.

In 2008, the confidence level was changed to 95% from 98% as an increasing incidence of significant market movements made the existing measure more volatile and less effective for risk management purposes. Switching to 95% made DVaR more stable and consequently improved management, transparency and control of the market risk profile.

The historical simulation calculation can be split into three parts:

– Calculate hypothetical daily profit or loss for each position over the most recent two years, using observed daily market moves.

– Sum hypothetical profit or losses for day one, giving one total profit or loss. This is repeated for all other days in the two year history.

– DVaR is the 95th percentile selected from the two years of daily hypothetical total profit or loss.

The DVaR model has been approved by the FSA to calculate regulatory capital for the trading book. The approval covers general market risk in interest rate, foreign exchange, commodities and equity products, and issuer specific risk for the majority of single name and portfolio traded credit products. Internally, as noted before, DVaR is calculated for both the trading and banking books.

When reviewing DVaR estimates, a number of considerations should be taken into account. These are:

– Historical simulation uses the recent past to generate possible future market moves but the past may not be a good indicator of the future

– The one day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be closed out or hedged within one day

– Intra-day risk is not captured

– DVaR does not indicate the potential loss beyond the 95th percentile.

DVaR is an important market risk measurement and control tool and consequently the model is regularly assessed. The main approach employed is the technique known asback-testing which counts the


The daily average, maximum and minimum values of DVaR, 95% and 98%, were calculated as below.

DVaR (95%)

          
    

12 months to

31st December 2008

  

12 months to

31st December 2007

    Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m
  Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m

Interest rate risk

  28.9  47.8  15.1  15.3  26.5  10.0

Credit spread risk

  31.1  71.7  15.4  17.3  28.0  10.8

Commodity risk

  18.1  25.4  12.5  15.3  19.0  10.7

Equity risk

  9.1  21.0  4.8  8.0  12.1  4.5

Foreign exchange risk

  5.9  13.0  2.1  3.8  7.2  2.1

Diversification effecta

  (39.7) n/a  n/a  (27.2) n/a  n/a

Total DVaR

  53.4  95.2  35.5  32.5  40.9  25.2
                   

DVaR (98%)

          
    12 months to
31st December 2008
  12 months to
31st December 2007
    Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m
  Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m

Interest rate risk

  45.0  80.9  21.0  20.0  33.3  12.6

Credit spread risk

  54.0  143.4  30.1  24.9  43.3  14.6

Commodity risk

  23.9  39.6  16.5  20.2  27.2  14.8

Equity risk

  12.8  28.9  6.7  11.2  17.6  7.3

Foreign exchange risk

  8.1  21.0  2.9  4.9  9.6  2.9

Diversification effecta

  (67.3) n/a  n/a  (39.2) n/a  n/a

Total DVaR

  76.5  158.8  47.5  42.0  59.3  33.1

Note

aThe high (and low) DVaR figures reported for each category did not necessarily occur on the same day as the high (and low) DVaR reported as a whole. Consequently a diversification effect number for the high (and low) DVaR figures would not be meaningful and it is therefore omitted from the above table.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

107


LOGO

number of days when a loss (as defined by the FSA in BIPRU 7.10) exceeds the corresponding DVaR estimate, measured at the 99% confidence level.

The FSA categorises a DVaR model as green, amber or red. A green model is consistent with a good working DVaR model and is achieved for models that have four or less back-testing exceptions in a 12-month period. For Barclays Capital’s trading book, green model status was maintained for 2008 and 2007.

To further improve the control framework, formal daily monitoring ofExpected Shortfall (ES) was started. This metric is the average of all the hypothetical losses beyond DVaR.

Stress testing provides an indication of the potential size of losses that could arise in extreme conditions. It helps to identify risk concentrations across business lines and assist senior management in capital planning decisions. A variety of different types of stress tests are performed in order to fulfil the objectives of stress testing. The global asset class stress tests have been designed to cover major asset classes including interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity, foreign exchange rates and emerging markets.

Stress results are produced at least fortnightly. If a potential stress loss exceeds the corresponding trigger limit, the positions captured by the stress test are reviewed and discussed by Barclays Capital market risk management and the respective Barclays Capital business heads. The minutes of the discussion, including the merits of the position and the appropriate course of action, are then sent to the Market Risk Director for review.

Scenario tests are hypothetical events which could lead to extreme yet plausible stress type moves under which profitability is seriously challenged. The scenarios are devised by senior risk managers and economists and are reviewed quarterly. Examples include ‘Global pandemic’, ‘Problems with GBP sovereign issuances’ and ‘Liquidity crisis’. The scenarios are calculated at least fortnightly and the results are included in the Traded Positions Risk Review meeting information pack.

Analysis of traded market risk exposures

The tables and graph show the time series for total DVaR with commentary. Further analysis is given in Note 48.

Analysis of trading revenue

The histograms below show the distribution of daily trading revenue for Barclays Capital in 2008 and 2007. Revenue includes net trading income, net interest income, net fees and commissions relating to primary trading, and the effects of gains or losses on own credit. The average daily revenue in 2008 was £19.5m (2007: £26.2m) and there were 203 positive revenue days out of 254 (2007: 224 out of 253). The number of negative revenue days increased in 2008, largely a result of volatile markets especially in the fourth quarter. The number of positive revenue days greater than £45m also increased but these were spread across the year.


LOGO

Notes

aTotal DVaR remains broadly at the same level as recorded in Dec 07.

bTotal DVaR reduces due to reduction in interest rate positions.

cBarclays acquires Lehman Brothers North American businesses during a period of extreme market volatility. The Lehman positions are subsequently reduced.

dDVaR increases significantly due to extreme market volatility following the failure of several financial intuitions and a material deterioration in the global economic outlook. Barclays changes to 95% DVaR to improve management, transparency and control of the market risk profile.


108

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Market risk management

Non-traded market risk

Barclays objective is to minimise non-traded market risks. This is achieved by transferring risk from the business to a local treasury or Group Treasury, which in turn hedges the net exposure with the external market. Limits exist to ensure no material risk is retained within any business or product area. The majority of exposures are within Global Retail and Commercial Banking.

Non-traded interest rate risk

Non-traded interest rate risk arises from the provision of retail and wholesale (non-traded) banking products and services.

The techniques used to measure and control non-traded interest rate risk include Annual Earnings at Risk, DVaR and Stress Testing. Book limits such as foreign exchange and interest position limits are also in place.

Annual Earnings at Risk (AEaR) measures the sensitivity of net interest income (NII) over the next 12 months. It is calculated on a monthly basis as the difference between the estimated income using the current yield curve and the lowest estimated income following a 100 basis points increase or decrease in interest rates.

To complement AEaR, the Group also uses a simplified version of theDVaR approach used by Barclays Capital.

Stress testing is also carried out by the business centres and is reviewed by senior management and business-level asset and liability committees. The stress testing is tailored to the business and typically incorporates scenario analysis and historical stress movements applied to respective portfolios.

The analysis of non-traded interest rate risk is given in Note 48.

Other market risks

Barclays maintains a number of defined benefit pension schemes for past and current employees. The ability of the Pension Fund to meet the projected pension payments is maintained through investments and regular Bank contributions.Pension risk arises because: the estimated market value of the pension fund assets might decline; or their investment returns might reduce; or the estimated value of the pension liabilities might increase. In these circumstances, Barclays could be required or might choose to make extra contributions to the pension fund. Financial details of the pension fund are in Note 30.

Investment risk is the risk of financial volatility arising from changes in the market value of investments, principally occurring in Barclays insurance companies and Barclays Global Investors. A change in the fair value of these investments may give rise to a liability which may have to be funded by the Group. It is Barclays policy to hedge such exposures in line with a defined risk appetite.

Barclays policy is for foreign exchange traded risk to be concentrated and managed in Barclays Capital. Some transactionalforeign exchange riskexposure arises within the local treasury operations in Global Retail and Commercial Banking to support and facilitate client activity. This is minimised in accordance with modest risk limits and was not material as at 31st December 2008. Other non-Barclays Capital foreign exchange exposure is covered in Note 48.

Asset management structural market risk arises where the fee and commission income earned by asset management products and businesses is affected by a change in market levels, primarily through the link between income and the value of assets under management.

It is Barclays policy that businesses monitor and report this risk against a defined risk appetite and regularly assess potential hedging strategies.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

109


LOGO

Risk management

Market risk management

Disclosures about certain trading activities

 

Disclosures about certain trading activities

including non-exchange traded commodity contracts

The Group provides a fully integrated service to clients for base metals, precious metals, oil, power, natural gas, coal, freight, emission credits, structured products and other related commodities. This service offering continues to expand, as market conditions allow, through the addition of new products and markets.

The Group offers both over the counter (OTC) and exchange traded derivatives, including swaps, options, forwards and futures and enters into physically settled contracts in base metals, power and natural gas, with 2007 seeing the addition of oil and related products to this portfolio.products. Physical commodity positions are held at fair value and reported under the Trading Portfolio in Note 12.12 on page 215.

Fair value measurement

The fair values of physical and derivative positions are primarily determined through a combination of recognised market observable prices, exchange prices, and established inter-commodity relationships.

Further information on fair value measurement of financial instruments can be found in Note 49.50 on page 287.

Credit risk

Credit risk exposures are actively managed by the Group. Refer to Note 47 on page 264 for more information on the Group’s approach to credit risk management and the credit quality of derivative assets.

Fair value of the commodity derivative contracts

The tables below analyse the overall fair value of the OTC commodity derivative contracts by movement over time and maturity. As at

31st December 20072008 the fair value of the commodity derivative contracts reflects a gross positive fair value of £23,571m (2006: £17,501m)£44,881m (2007: £23,571m) and a gross negative value of £22,759m (2006: £15,940m)£45,817m (2007: £22,759m).

Movement in fair value of commodity derivative positions


 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding
at the beginning of the period
  1,561  527 
Contracts realised or otherwise settled
during the period
  (764) 379 
Fair value of new contracts entered into
during the period
  243  808 

Other changes in fair values

  (228) (153)
Fair value of contracts outstanding
at the end of the period
  812  1,561 

Maturity analysis of commodity derivative fair value

Movement in fair value of commodity derivative
positions
         
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
 

Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period

  812  1,561 

Contracts realised or otherwise settled during the period

  241  (764)

Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period

  (1,245) 243 

Other changes in fair values

  (744) (228)

Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period

  (936) 812 

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m

Not more than one year

  (279) 902

Over one year but not more than five years

  773  327

Over five years

  318  332

Total

  812  1,561
Maturity analysis of commodity derivative fair value         
    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

 

Not more than one year

  (2,022) (279)

Over one year but not more than five years

  999  773 

Over five years

  87  318 

Total

  (936) 812 

 

90110 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

Risk management

RiskLiquidity risk management

Liquidity managementOrganisation and structure

 

Liquidity management

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its obligations when they fall due as a result of customer deposits being withdrawn, cash requirements from contractual commitments, or other cash outflows, such as debt maturities. Such outflows would deplete available cash resources for client lending, trading activities and investments. In extreme circumstances lack of liquidity could result in reductions in balance sheet and sales of assets, or potentially an inability to replace funds when they are withdrawn, with consequent failure to repay depositors and fulfil commitments to lend.lending commitments. The risk that it will be unable to do so is inherent in all banking operations and can be impactedaffected by a range of institution specificinstitution-specific and market-wide events including, but not limited to, credit events, merger and acquisition activity, systemic shocks and natural disasters.

 

Barclays Treasury operates a centralised governance and control process that covers all of the Group’s liquidity risk management activities. Businesses assist Barclays Treasury in policy formation and limit setting by providing relevant and expert input for their local markets and customers.

Execution of the Group’s liquidity risk management strategy is carried out at country level within agreed policies, controls and limits, with the Country Treasurer providing reports directly to Barclays Treasury to evidence conformance with the agreed risk profile. Liquidity risk is a standing agenda item at Country and Cluster Asset and Liability Committees and on a consolidated basis is reported to the Group’s Treasury Committee.

The objective of the Group’s liquidity risk management strategy is to ensure that the funding profile of individual businesses and the Group as a whole is appropriate to underlying market conditions and the profile of our business in each given country. Liquidity risk limits and controls are flexed to achieve that profile and are based on regular qualitative and quantitative assessments of conditions and abilities under both normal and stressed conditions. Businesses are only allowed to have funding exposure to wholesale markets where they can demonstrate that their market is sufficiently deep and liquid and then only relative to the size and complexity of their business.

Liquidity limits reflect both local regulatory requirements as well as the behavioural characteristics of their balance sheets. Breaches of limits are reported to Treasury Committee together with details of the requirements to return to compliance.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

111


LOGO

Risk management

Liquidity risk management and measurement

Key elements

Liquidity management within the Group has several components.

Intraday liquidity

The need to monitor, manage and control intraday liquidity in real time is recognised by the Group as a mission critical process: any failure to meet specific intraday commitments would have significant consequences.consequences, such as a visible market disruption.

The Group policy is that each operation must ensure that it has access to sufficient intraday liquidity to meet any obligations it may have to clearing and settlement systems. Major currency payment flows and payment system collateral are monitored and managed in real time to ensure that at all times there is sufficient collateral to make payments. In practice, the Group maintains a significant buffer of surplus intraday liquidity to ensure that payments are made on a timely basis. The Group actively engages in payment system development to help ensure that new payment systems are robust.

Day to day funding

Day to day funding is managed by short term mismatchthrough limits for the next day, weekon wholesale borrowings, secured borrowings and month which control expected cash flows tofunding mismatches. These ensure that requirements can be met.on any day and over any period there is a limited amount of refinancing required. These requirements include replenishment of funds as they mature or are borrowed by customers. The Retail and Commercial Bank together with Wealth maintain no reliance on wholesale funding. The Group maintains an active presence in global money markets through Barclays Capital and monitors and manages the wholesale money market capacity for the Group’s name to enable that to happen.

In addition to cash flow management, Treasury also monitors unmatched medium-termterm mismatches between assets and liabilities, as well as the level and type of undrawn lending commitments, the usage of overdraft facilities and the impact of contingent liabilities such as standby letters of credit and guarantees.

Liquid assets

The Group maintains a portfolio of highly marketable assets including UK, US and Euro-area government bonds that can be sold or funded on a secured basis as protection against any unforeseen interruption to cash flow. The Group accesses secured funding markets in these assets on a regular basis to ensure market access.basis. The Group does not rely on committed funding lines for protection against unforeseen interruptioninterruptions to cash flow.

Diversification of liquidity sources

Sources of liquidity are regularly reviewed to maintain a wide diversification by currency, geography, provider, product and term. In addition, to avoid reliance on a particular group of customers or market sectors, the distribution of sources and the maturity profile of deposits are also carefully managed. Important factors in assuring liquidity are competitive ratesstrength of relationships and the maintenance of depositors’ confidence. Such confidence is based on a number of factors including the Group’s reputation and relationship with those clients, the strength of earnings and the Group’s financial position.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

91


Risk management

Liquidity management

Structural liquidity

An important source of structural liquidity is provided by our core retail deposits in the UK, Europe and Africa, mainly current accounts and savings accounts. Although current accounts are repayable on demand and savings accounts at short notice, the Group’s broad base of customers – numerically and by depositor type – helps to protect against unexpected fluctuations. Such accounts form a stable funding base for the Group’s operations and liquidity needs.

The Group policy is to fund the balance sheet of the retailRetail and commercial bankCommercial Bank together with Wealth and Head office functions on a global basis with customer deposits and capital without recourse to the wholesale markets. This provides protection from the liquidity risk of wholesale market funding. The exception to this policy is Absa, which has a large portion of wholesale funding due to the structural nature of the South African financial sector.

Stress testsScenario analysis and stress testing

Stress testing is undertaken to assess and plan for the impact of various scenarios which may put the Group’s liquidity at risk.

Treasury develops and monitors a range of stress tests on the Group’s projected cash flows. These stress scenarios include Barclays-specific scenarios such as an unexpected rating downgrade and operational problems, and external scenarios such as Emerging Market crises, payment system disruption and macro-economic shocks. The output informs both the liquidity mismatch limits and the Group’s contingency funding plan.

This is maintained by Treasury and is aligned with the Group and country business resumption plans to encompass decision-making authorities, internal and external communication and, in the event of a systems failure, the restoration of liquidity management and payment systems.


LOGO

112

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Liquidity risk management

Key elements

The ability to raise funds is in part dependent on maintaining the Bank’s credit rating. The funding impact of a credit downgrade is regularly estimated.closely tracked. Whilst the impact of a single downgrade may affect the price at which funding is available, the effect on liquidity is not considered material in Group terms.

For further details see contractual obligations and commercial commitments of the Group on page 46.19.

RecentYear end assessment of liquidity

Barclays maintained a strong liquidity profile in 2008, sufficient to absorb the impact of a stressed funding environment. The Group has access to a substantial pool of liquidity both in secured markets and from unsecured depositors including numerous foreign governments and central banks. In addition, our limited reliance on securitisations as a source of funding has meant that the uncertainty in securitisation markets has not impacted our liquidity risk profile.

Whilst funding markets were extremely difficult in the latter half of 2008, and particularly since September 2008, Barclays was able to increase available liquidity, extend the term of unsecured liabilities, and reduce reliance on unsecured funding. Barclays has participated in various government and central bank liquidity facilities, both to aid central banks implementation of monetary policy and support central bank initiatives, where participation has enabled the lengthening of the term of our refinancing. These facilities have improved access to term funding, and helped moderate money market eventsrates.

For the Group, loans and advances to customers and banks are more than covered by the combination of customer deposits and longer term debt at 112% at 31st December 2008 (2007: 125%).

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

The second halfsum of last year sawliabilities in Global Retail and Commercial Banking, Barclays Wealth and Head office functions exceeds assets in those businesses. As a sustained periodresult they have no reliance on wholesale funding. The balance sheet is modelled to reflect behavioural experience in both assets and liabilities, and is managed to maintain a positive cash profile (table 1).

Throughout 2008 Global Retail and Commercial Banking continued to grow the amount of severe stressdeposits despite competitive pressures (table 2).

Barclays Capital

Barclays Capital manages liquidity to be self-funding through wholesale sources, managing access to liquidity to ensure that potential cash outflows in international financial markets characterised by increased volatility and impaired liquidity. Issuance of debt, particularly structured credit and mortgage related, fell sharply. The asset-backed commercial paper market was severely disrupted, resulting in the drawn down of committed liquidity lines from banks, while primary issuance of mortgage-backed securities and covered bonds stopped for a time. The repo markets including tri-party were also disrupted with the repo market for corporate debt closing for a time. Term money market funding became difficult to obtain and spreads over official rates widened.stressed environment are covered.

 

Funding reliability is maintained by accessing a wide variety of investors and geographies and by building and maintaining strong relationships with these providers of liquidity.

Unsecured funding

Additionally, unsecured funding is managed within specific term limits. The Group maintained its strongterm of unsecured liabilities has been extended, with average life improving by four months from eight months at the end of December 2007 to 12 months at the end of December 2008.

Our capital markets debt issuance includes issues of senior and subordinated debt in US registered offerings and medium term note programmes and European medium term note programs. Substantially all of our unsecured senior issuance is without covenants that trigger increased cost or accelerate maturity. Furthermore, between September and December 2008 we issued £11bn in government guaranteed debt, £9bn in maturities of one to three years and £2bn in under one-year maturities.

Secured funding

Barclays funds securities based on liquidity profile throughout and saw some benefit from a flight to qualitycharacteristics. Limits are in financial markets. Nevertheless, Barclays, like its peers, was affected by the increased volatility and impairedplace for each security asset class reflecting liquidity in financial markets. During this period the Group’s balance sheet expanded due to:cash and financing markets for these assets. Approximately 80% of assets funded in repurchase and stock loan transactions are fundable within central bank facilities (excluding Bank of England Emergency facilities and the Federal Reserve Primary Dealer Credit Facility).

Liquidity risk to secured funding is also mitigated by:

 

 

The disruption of the Asset Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) market led to liquidity facilities for third party conduits being drawn down.selecting reliable counterparties

 

 

Liquidity facilities were provided to three client SIV-lites which were restructured duringmaintaining term financing and by limiting the period.amount of overnight funding

 

 

A numberlimiting overall secured funding usage

Readily available liquidity

Substantial resources are maintained to offset maturing deposits and debt. These readily available assets are sufficient to absorb stress level losses of liquidity from unsecured as well as contingent cash outflows, such as collateral requirements on ratings downgrades. The sources of liquidity and contingent liquidity are from a wide variety of sources, including deposits held with central banks and unencumbered securities.

In addition, the Group maintains significant pools of securitisable assets.


LOGO

Table 1: Expected Net Cash Inflows/(Outflows) on a Behavioural Basis

  

    Up to 1 yr
£bn
  1-3yrs
£bn
  3-5yrs
£bn
  Over 5 yrs
£bn
 

As at 31.12.08

  20  34  14  (95)

Note

aMBS includes only agency mortgages. ABS includes private label issuance of loan syndications were delayedresidential mortgage backed securities.

Table 2: Global Retail and Commercial Banking Deposit Balances

  As at
31.12.08
£bn
  As at
30.06.08
£bn
  As at
31.12.07
£bn
  As at
30.06.07
£bn
  As at
31.12.06
£bn

Total customer deposits

 235  218  211  200  190

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

113


LOGO

Risk management

Capital risk management

Organisation and structure

Barclays operates a centralised capital management model, considering both regulatory and economic capital.

The Group’s capital management objectives are to:

Maintain sufficient capital resources to meet the minimum regulatory capital requirements set by the FSA and remainedthe US Federal Reserve Bank’s requirements that a financial holding company be well capitalised.

Maintain sufficient capital resources to support the Group’s risk appetite and economic capital requirements.

Support the Group’s credit rating.

Ensure locally regulated subsidiaries can meet their minimum capital requirements.

Allocate capital to businesses to support the Group’s strategic objectives, including optimising returns on our balance sheet.economic and regulatory capital.

Treasury Committee manages compliance with the Group’s capital management objectives. The Committee reviews actual and forecast capital demand and resources on a monthly basis. The processes in place for delivering the Group’s capital management objectives are:

Establishment of internal targets for capital demand and ratios

Managing capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange rate movements

Ensuring local entity regulatory capital adequacy

Allocating capital to the Group’s strategic medium-term plan

Economic capital management

In addition to the processes above, the Risk Oversight Committee and the Board Risk Committee annually review and set risk appetite (see page 65) and analyse the impacts of stress scenarios (see page 66) in order to understand and manage the Group’s projected capital adequacy.


114

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Capital risk management

Key elements

Internal targets

To support its capital management objectives, the Group sets internal targets for its key capital ratios. Internal targets are reviewed regularly by Treasury Committee to take account of:

Changes in forecast demand for capital caused by accessing new business opportunities, including mergers and acquisitions

Flexibility in debt capital issuance and securitisation plans

 

 

The demand for ABCP issued by Barclays-sponsored conduits weakened temporarily with the result that a small portionpossible impact of their funding was provided by Barclays.stress scenarios including:

These liquidity demands were

Changes in forecast demand for capital from unanticipated drawdown of committed facilities or as a result of deterioration in the credit quality of the Group’s assets

Changes in forecast profits and other capital resources

Changes to capital resources and forecast demand due to foreign exchange rate movements.

Managing capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange rate movements

The Group has capital resources (capturing investments in subsidiaries and branches, intangible assets, minority interests and debt capital) and risk weighted assets denominated in non-Sterling currencies. Changes in foreign exchange rates result in changes in the Sterling equivalent value of non-Sterling denominated capital resources and risk weighted assets. As a result, the Group’s regulatory capital ratios are sensitive to foreign exchange rate movements.

The Group’s hedge strategy is to minimise the volatility of all successfullycapital ratios whilst taking into account the impact on hedging of non-Sterling net investments, the cost of hedging, the availability of a suitable foreign exchange market and prevailing foreign exchange rates.

To minimise volatility in the equity ratio, the Group aims over time to maintain the ratio of foreign currency equity capital resources to RWAs the same as the Group’s equity ratio. To create equity capital resources denominated in non-Sterling currencies, the Group leaves some investments in core non-Sterling subsidiaries and branches unhedged. The resultant change in the Sterling value of the investments is captured in the currency translation reserve, resulting in an equity capital movement.

Depending on the value of non-Sterling net investments, it may not always be possible to maintain the ratio, leaving some capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange movements.

The proceeds from equity accounted foreign currency preference shares are also used in the equity ratio hedge. If a preference share is redeemed, the cumulative movement in the currency translation reserve will be offset by an equal and opposite movement in other reserves reflecting the revaluation of the preference shares to prevailing foreign exchange rates.

The exposure of the Tier 1 and total capital ratios to foreign exchange rate movements is managed within overall fundingby issuing, where possible, debt capital in non-Sterling currencies such that the ratio of Tier 1 and total capital resources to risk weighted assets is the same as the Group’s Tier 1 and total capital ratios. This is primarily achieved by the issuance of debt capital from Barclays Bank PLC in major currencies, but can also be achieved by subsidiaries issuing capital in local currencies.

Local entity regulatory capital adequacy

The Group manages its capital resources to ensure that those Group entities that are subject to local capital adequacy regulation in individual jurisdictions meet their minimum capital requirements. Local management manages compliance with entities minimum regulatory

capital requirements despite occasional disruptionby reporting to local Asset and Liability Committees with oversight by Treasury Committee, as required.

Injections of accesscapital resources into Group entities are centrally controlled by Treasury Committee, under authorities delegated from the Group Executive Committee. The Group’s policy is for surplus capital held in Group entities to some funding markets. Although term fundingbe repatriated to Barclays Bank PLC in interbank markets substantially disappeared, liquidity remained goodthe form of dividends and/or capital repatriation, subject to local regulatory requirements, exchange controls and tax implications.

Other than as indicated above, the Group is not aware of any material impediments to the prompt transfer of capital resources or repayment of intra-group liabilities when due.

Allocating capital in the Group’s strategic medium-term plan

Capital adequacy and returns on regulatory and economic capital form a key part of the Group’s annual strategic medium-term planning process. Amongst other strategic objectives, the Group seeks to optimise returns on economic and regulatory capital through the planning process. To achieve this, executive management consider returns on risk weighted assets and economic capital when setting limits for Barclays.business capital demand. Executive management will also review the forecast capital ratios to ensure internal targets continue to be met over the medium-term plan.

Barclays diversified portfolioTreasury Committee reviews the limits on capital demand on a monthly basis taking into account actual performance.

Economic capital management

Economic capital is an internal measure of highly marketable securities enabledthe minimum equity and preference capital required for the Group to continue accessingmaintain its credit rating based upon its risk profile.

Barclays assesses economic capital requirements by measuring the repo market. Securitisation accountsGroup risk profile using both internally and externally developed models. The Group assigns economic capital primarily within the following risks: Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Fixed Assets, Private Equity and Pension Risk. Group Risk owns the methodology and policy for a modest proportioneconomic capital while the businesses are primarily responsible for the calculation.

The Group regularly enhances its economic capital methodology and benchmarks outputs to external reference points. The framework reflects default probabilities during average credit conditions, rather than those prevailing at the balance sheet date, thus removing some of the cyclicality from the economic capital calculation. Economic capital for wholesale credit risk includes counterparty credit risk arising as a result of credit risk on traded market exposures. The framework also adjusts economic capital to reflect time horizon, correlation of risks and risk concentrations.

Economic capital is allocated on a consistent basis across all of Barclays businesses and risk activities. A single cost of equity is applied to calculate the cost of risk. Economic capital allocations reflect varying levels of risk.

The total average economic capital required by the Group, as determined by risk assessment models and after considering the Group’s funding soestimated portfolio effects, is compared with the disruptionaverage supply of capital resources to evaluate economic capital utilisation.

The Group’s economic capital calculations form the basis of its Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (‘ICAAP’) submission to the securitisation market has not significantly impacted the Group’s liquidity position.FSA under Pillar 2 of Basel II.

Assessment of liquidityCapital Allocation

Barclays liquidity position remains very strong both for its own paperIn 2008, UK Retail Banking economic capital allocation increased £550m to £3,950m (2007: £3,400m), reflecting mortgage asset growth and paper issued by its sponsored conduits. We have benefited from significant inflows of deposits, increased credit lines from counterparties, increased client flows and continued full funding of our conduits.

The marketsmovements in 2008 have substantially improved with the passing of the year end, and a degree of normality has returned to the term interbank markets. However we expect there to continue to be dislocations through 2008, and we remain vigilant to ensure that our liquidity profile remains strong.

The FSA published a discussion paper in December 2007 setting out draft proposals for a new quantitative framework for regulating liquidity of banks in the UK in the light of the experiences of 2007. We welcome the FSA intention to update the liquidity regime.benchmark house price indices.


 

92 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 115


LOGO

Risk management

Capital risk management

Barclays Commercial Bank economic capital allocation increased £300m to £3,500m (2007: £3,200m), primarily as a consequence of asset growth with some mitigation from portfolio management activity.

Barclaycard economic capital allocation increased £650m to £2,700m (2007: £2,050m), driven by acquisitions, the redemption of securitisation deals and exposure growth, predominantly in the US.

GRCB – Western Europe economic capital allocation increased £650m to £1,900m (2007: £1,250m), primarily reflecting the weakening of Sterling and underlying lending growth.

GRCB – Emerging Markets economic capital allocation increased £650m to £1,100m (2007: £450m), reflecting broad-based retail and wholesale asset growth across the business, especially in India, UAE and the new markets of Russia and Pakistan.

GRCB – Absa economic capital allocation increased £200m to £1,100m (2007: £900m), reflecting balance sheet growth.

Barclays Capital economic capital allocation increased £3,050m to £8,250m (2007: £5,200m). This was driven by growth in the investment portfolio, deterioration in credit quality, exposure to drawn leveraged finance underwriting positions and an increase in market volatility.

Barclays Global Investors economic capital allocation increased £200m to £400m (2007: £200m). This was primarily driven by an increase in the support for selected cash funds and some increase in proprietary investments.

Barclays Wealth economic capital allocation in 2008 remained unchanged at £500m, despite strong growth on the balance sheet. This was due to the impact of greater geographical diversification and increased levels of collateralisation.


   2008
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
The average supply of capital to support the economic capital frameworka   
Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests less goodwillb  17,650  14,150 
Retirement benefits liability  1,050  1,150 
Cash flow hedging reserve  100  250 
Available for sale reserve  400  (150)
Gains on own credit  (1,250) (100)
Preference shares  5,500  3,700 
Available funds for economic capital excluding goodwill  23,450  19,000 
Average historic goodwill and intangible assetsb  9,450  8,400 
Available funds for economic capital including goodwillc  32,900  27,400 

LOGO

LOGO

Operational risk managementNotes

 

aAverages for the period will not correspond to period-end balances disclosed in the balance sheet. Numbers are rounded to the nearest £50m for presentational purposes only.

bAverage goodwill relates to purchased goodwill and intangible assets from business acquisitions.

cAvailable funds for economic capital as at 31st December 2008 stood at £40,150m (2007:£29,200m).
dAverage EC charts exclude the EC calculated for pension risk (average pension risk for 2008 is £650m compared with £500m in 2007).

eIncludes Transition Businesses and capital for central function risks.

fIncludes credit risk loans.

gIncludes investments in associates, private equity risk, insurance risk and residual value.

116

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Operational risk management

Organisation and structure

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect losses resulting from human factors, external events, and inadequate or failed internal processes and systems.

Operational risks are inherent in Barclaysthe Group’s operations and are typical of any large enterprise. Major sources of operational risk include: operational process reliability, IT security, outsourcing of operations, dependence on key suppliers, implementation of strategic change, integration of acquisitions, fraud, human error, customer service quality, regulatory compliance, recruitment, training and retention of staff, and social and environmental impacts.

Barclays is committed to the advanced measurement and management of operational risks. In particular, it has implemented improved management and measurement approaches for operational risk to strengthen control, improve customer service and minimise operating losses. Barclays was granted a Waiver to operate an Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) under Basel II, which commenced in January 2008.

The Group’s operational risk management framework aims to:

 

 

Understand and report the operational risks being taken by the Group.

 

 

Capture and report operational errors made.

 

 

Understand and minimise the frequency and impact, on a cost benefit basis, of operational risk events.

Barclays works closely with peer banks to benchmark our internal Operational Riskoperational risk practices and to drive the development of advanced Operational Riskoperational risk techniques across the industry. It is not cost effective to attempt to eliminate all operational risks and in any event it would not be possible to do so. Events of small significance are expected to occur and are accepted as inevitable; events of material significance are rare and the Group seeks to reduce the risk from these in a framework consistent with its agreed Risk Appetite.

Organisation and structure

Barclays has a Group Operational Risk Framework, which is consistent with and part of the Group Internal Control and Assurance Framework. Minimum control requirements have been established for all key areas of identified risk by ‘Principal Risk’ owners (see page 85)65). The risk categories relevant to operational risks are Financial Crime, Financial Reporting, Taxation, Legal, Operations, People, Regulatory Technology and Change.Technology. In addition the following risk categories are used for business risk: Brand Management, Corporate Responsibility, Strategic and Strategic.

Change. Responsibility for implementing and overseeing these policies is positioned throughout the organisation.with Group Principal Risk Owners. The prime responsibility for the management of operational risk and the compliance with control requirements rests with the business and functional units where the risk arises. FrontlineFront line risk managers are widely distributed throughout the Group in business units. They service and support these areas, assisting line managers in managing these risks.

Business Risk Directors in each business are responsible for overseeing the implementation of and compliance with Group policies. Governance and Control Committees in each business monitor control effectiveness. The Group Governance and Control Committee receives reports from the committees in the businesses and considers Group-wideGroup-significant control issues and their remediation.

In the corporate centre,Group Centre, each Principal Risk is owned by a senior individual who liaises with Principal Risk owners within the businesses. In addition, the Operational Risk Director oversees the range of operational risks across the Group in accordance with the Group Operational Risk Framework.

Business units are required to report on both a regular and an event- drivenevent-driven basis. The reports include a profile of the keymaterial risks to their business objectives, control issues of Group-level significance, and operational risk events. Specific reports are prepared on a regular basis for the Group Risk Oversight Committee, the Board Risk Committee and the Board Audit Committee. In particular, the Group Operational Risk Profile and Group Operating Committee Report is provided quarterly to the Group Risk Oversight Committee. The Internal Audit function provides further assurance for operational risk control across the organisation and reports to the Board and senior management.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

117


LOGO

Risk management

Operational risk management

Operational risk measurementMeasurement and capital modelling

Barclays applies a consistent approach to the identification and assessment of key risks and controls across all business units. Managers in the businesses use self-assessment techniques to identify risks, evaluate control effectiveness and monitor capability.performance. Business management determines whether particular risks are effectively managed within business risk appetiteRisk Appetite and otherwise takes remedial action. The risk assessment process is consistent with the principles in the integrated framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

A standard process is used Group-wide for the recognition, capture, assessment, analysis and reporting of risk events. This process is used to help identify where process and control requirements are needed to reduce the recurrence of risk events. Risk events are loaded onto a central database and reported monthly to the Group Operational Risk Executive Committee.

Barclays also uses a database of external public risk events and is a member of the Operational Risk Data Exchange (ORX), an association of international banks that share anonymised loss data information to assist in risk identification, assessment and modelling.

By combining internal data, including internal loss experience, risk and control assessments, key indicators and audit findings, with external loss data and expert management judgement, Barclays is able to generate Key Risk Scenarios (KRSs), which identify the most significant operational risks across the Group. The KRSs are validated at business unit and at Group level to ensure that they appropriately reflect the level of operational risk. It is these thatThese are the main input to our capital model.

Operational risk capital is allocated, on a risk sensitive basis, to business units in the form of economic capital charges, providing an incentive to manage these risks within appetite levels.


118

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Operational risk management

Operational Risk Eventsrisk events

A high proportion of Barclays operational risk events have a low financial cost associated with them and a very small proportion of operational risk events have a material impact. Figure 1 shows that in 2007, 79%In 2008, 73% of reported operational loss events had a value of £50,000 or less. Figure 2 shows that thisless (2007: 79%) but accounted for 8% of risk events by count only amounted tothe overall impact (2007: 15% of risk events by value.). In contrast, 2% of the operational risk events had a value of £1m or greater (2007: 2%) but accounted for 50%66% of the overall loss. This was consistent with 2006 risk events and, from our analysis of external data, is in line with industry experience.impact (2007: 50%).

Analysis of Barclays operational risk events in 20072008 by Basel II category, as shown in figure 3,1, highlights that the highest frequency of events occurred in External Fraud (54%(46%) and Execution, Delivery and Process Management (37%(42%). These two areas also accounted for the majority of losses by value (figure 4)2), with Execution, Delivery and Process Management accounting for 52%81% of total operational risk losses and External Fraud accounting for 24%10%. This again was consistentCompared with 2006 internal risk2007 we have seen a reduction in External Fraud and an increase in Execution, Delivery and Process Management events, and, from our analysis of external data, is in line with industry experience.driven mainly by market volatility.

Barclays has been granted a waiver by the UK FSA to apply an Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for Group-wide consolidated and solus regulatory capital reporting. Barclays has applied the AMA Group-wide. The two areasAreas where roll-out of AMA is still continuing and where the Standardised approach is currently applied are Banco Austral (Mozambique) andBarclays Bank Mozambique, National Bank of Commerce Limited (Tanzania), and the US Airways card portfolio purchased from Bank of America. Areas where roll-out of AMA is ongoing and where the Standardised ApproachBasic Indicator approach is currently applied.applied are Banco Comercial Angolano, Woolworths Financial Services in South Africa, Barclays Bank PLC Pakistan, Barclays Investment and Loans India Limited, Barclays Bank LLC Russia and the Cash Equity, Municipal Bonds and M&A business acquired from Lehman Brothers. In certain joint ventures and associates, Barclays may not be able to apply the Advanced Operational Risk Framework.

Barclays does not currently use insuranceoffset the expected loss or expected losses to offsetmitigating effect of insurances against its regulatory capital requirement. However, Barclays has applied to the FSA to offset expected loss.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

93

LOGO


Risk management

Operational risk management

LOGOLOGO

 

94 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 119


LOGO

Risk management

Financial crime risk management

Anti-money laundering and sanctions risk

Financial crime risk managementis a category of operational risk. It arises from the risk that the Group might fail to comply with financial crime legislation and industry laws on anti-money laundering or might suffer losses as a result of internal or external fraud, or might fail to ensure the security of personnel, physical premises and the Group’s assets.

Barclays adopts an integrated approach to financial crime risk management. In line with the five-step risk management model, Group Financial Crime Management (GFCM) has the responsibility to direct, assess, control, report and manage/challenge financial crime risks, which are structured into three strands: anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions; fraud; and security.

Each business unit within Barclays develops its own capability to tackle financial crime, providing regular reporting on performance, incidents and the latest trends impacting business. This integrated model allows us to:

 

 

Develop a clear profile of financial crime risk across the Group.Group

 

 

Share intelligence, adopt common standards and respond promptly to emerging issues.issues

 

 

Drive forward law enforcement and other Government initiatives.government initiatives

 

 

Benchmark ourselves against other financial institutions facing similar challenges.challenges

 

Anti-money laundering and sanctions risk

The Group assesses the implications of all emerging legal and regulatory requirements that impact it and establishes and operates an AML Risk control framework and associated policies and proceduresminimum standards in respect of AML, terrorist financing, sanctions and sanctions, updating these regularly.bribery and corruption.

ItThe Group operates an AML assuranceoversight programme to ensure a system of effective controls to comply with the overarching policies, providing technical guidance and support to each business unit. This is monitored via conformance testing both at the business units and the Group level. In 2008, Barclays Internal Audit completed a combined global audit of Know Your Customer, AML and Sanctions procedures.

GFCM collates and oversees the preparation of Group-wide management information on AML and sanctions. This information includes risk indicators, such as volumes of suspicious activity reports (SARs) and is supplemented by trend analysis, which highlights high-risk or emerging issues so that prompt action can be taken to address them.

Three committees (the AML Steering Committee, the Sanctions Cross ClusterCross-Cluster Operational Review Board the AML Steering Committee and the Policy Review Forum), review business performance, share intelligence, develop and agree controls, and discuss emerging themes and the implementation status of policies and procedures.

All businesses contribute towards the Group Money Laundering Reporting Officers Annual Report, which is provided to Group Senior Executive Managementsenior executive management and is available to the FSA. Together with regular management information and conformance testing, this report updates senior management with evidence that the Group’s money laundering and terrorist financing risks are being appropriately, proportionally and effectively managed.

During 2007,2008, the Group augmented its AMLsanctions capability implementing third EU money laundering directive, with its guiding principleby issuing a revised Sanctions Policy. This enhances certain areas of a risk-based approach. For AML, this must be proportionate to the perceived risks and threats, including terrorist financing.

A new Group AML Policy, launched in December 2007 and encapsulating the risk-based approach, has further improved the Group’s customer due diligence procedures and standards, transaction monitoring and staff training and awareness.

The Group also implemented EU Regulation 1781/2006, which aims to ensure thorough and robust audit trails concerning electronic transfers. This assists the Group in monitoring its AML and terrorist financing and improves the information available to law enforcement authorities.control such as screening.

Barclays continues to upgrade its sanctions screening capabilities, in line with best international practice and changing regulatory requirements. The Grouprequirements and has invested substantial resources to further enhance its monitoring capabilities in this area and will continue to do so.

Representatives of the Group attend industry fora such as the Wolfsberg Group, the British Bankers Association’s Money Laundering Policy Group (MLPG) and the Money Laundering Advisory Panel (MLAP), to ensure that Barclays is influential in discussing and interpreting new legislation.

In 2008, the Group will review procedurescontinued to ensure compliance with forthcoming legislation concerningfollow developments in the Single European Payments Area (SEPA). Should the US enact current draft legislation outlawing the use of the international, with a view to developing its payments and clearing systems for perceived illegal US internet gaming transactions, further enhancements to payments activity monitoring will follow.accordingly.


 

120

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

95


Risk management

Financial crime risk management

Fraud risk and security risk

 

Fraud risk

The Group establishes and operates a fraud risk control framework which measures overall fraud risk exposure and controls. Together with the Group-wide policies and reporting, this structure directs how fraud is managed.

The Group Financial Crime Management team (GFCM)GFCM is responsible for delivering the overall fraud strategy andGroup Fraud Strategy by providing oversight to Group and Business Unitsbusiness units in order to managethe management of fraud risk.

The strategyGroup Fraud Strategy is designed to:

Contain existing risks through effective measurement, monitoring and robust anti-fraud systems, in line with the expansion of the bank

 

 

Identify emerging threats in order that effective fraud controls are embedded across the Group and build upalong with increased capability to manage risk.risk

 

 

Identify and manage fraud incidents, ensuring regulatory and legal conformance, appropriate escalation and resolution of control issues are addressed to prevent further loss.loss

 

 

Work proactively to highlight areas of concern in order that remediation can take place.Share fraud trends, intelligence and knowledge across the Group and between government bodies, law enforcement agencies, financial institutions and other key stakeholders

GFCM assesses the fraud risk ofacross existing and emerging products, services, processeschannels, and jurisdictionsjurisdictions. It has embedded a robust fraud reporting framework which tracks current exposure to drive down fraud losses as turnover/growth increases. It also represents Barclays at trade, industryidentify risk and Government bodies providing a conduit to maximise the flow of informationensure adequate risk management capability and intelligence. GFCM also provides technical expertise tocontrols.

The Group’s business areas whether to drive through Group solutions or provide assistance with specific incidents and investigations.

Business Units, together with product holders and channelsunits identify their appetite for fraud loss which informs and determines the overall fraud plan. Objectives are then set around these plans.plans and performance is monitored through reporting and oversight via appropriate Governance Committees at both business unit and Group level.

AtBarclays undertakes regular benchmarking performance reviews with relevant peer groups and maintains a business level, fraud risk/loss committees track fraud (and in some cases operational) loss. conduit to ensure a two-way exchange of information and intelligence at government, trade and industry levels.

The Barclays Group Fraud Risk profile is exercisedtracked regularly through the review and challenge of the net losses and key risk metrics; these are then viewed against the overall Fraud Risk Profile (Fraud(at the Fraud Risk Oversight Committee).

FraudAggregated fraud data is reported monthly to senior management both withinmanagement. The performance of the Business Units and to Group who provide a global oversight ofbusiness in combating fraud loss. Fraudlosses is measured against plan for both net and gross losses and in line with the Principal Risk Policy;Policy. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) are embedded in order that overall exposure can be established.

As a result of this process, fraud performance both at Business Unit and Group level can be measured and appropriate action taken to minimise or track significant issues.

Externally there are ‘in country’ industry-wide forums to which Barclays contributes and in some cases can benchmark performance, controls and current and emerging issues.

Barclays overall reported fraud losses fellincreased in 2007,2008 in line with most ofindustry trends. Whilst industry and proprietary initiatives (online and Chip/PIN) have continued to pay dividends and reduce exposure in some areas, fraud increased in other areas and in geographies that do not have Chip and PIN technology.

In 2008, the reduction coming fromGroup implemented a new global fraud application system aimed at preventing first-party fraud.

Compromised customer details continue to be a significant falls in internet banking fraud. As part of its effortsthreat globally. GFCM continues to enhance security, Barclays offers all its personal customers complimentary internet security software to reduce phishing attacks. The Group has also rolled out two-factor authentication technology using the new PINsentry device to make online transactions more secure. Enhanced transaction profiling has further improved our ability to identify where customer accounts have been targeted by fraudsters and take preventative action to protect funds.

Following the loss of personal data, including bank details, by both

Government agencies and other third parties, data protection and security was a prominent theme in 2007. Barclays treats any incident of this nature with the utmost importance and has workedwork closely with industry and the Government to take stepsother associated bodies to:

Reassure customers and provide points of contact for help and guidance.

 

 

Protect any customer accounts, whose details may have been compromised.be compromised

 

 

Develop a standard approach for dealing with accounts that may be impacted by any data compromise or security breaches.breach

Reassure customers and provide points of contact for help and guidance.

Security risk

Group Financial Crime Management (GFCM) alsoGFCM manages security risk. Its fundamental objective is to allow Barclays to operate in a safe and secure manner in all existing and potential future markets.

In pursuit of this objective, the Security Risksecurity risk team gathers and shares current threat assessments across business areas, using intelligence from Securitysecurity and Government Agenciesgovernment agencies and ‘in country’in-country teams. It ensures that suitable policies and control systems are in place to protect Group business and that plans to protect high-risk personnel are fit for purpose and in line with accepted best practice.personnel.

Barclays has developed and continues to improve a robust people screeningGroup-wide people-screening process to protect the bankGroup from those people who want to harm the organisation, by either joining as staff members or becoming involved with its operations.

Security Riskrisk is regularly reported by the businesses and reviewed via the Security Risk Management Committee, whose objectives are to:

 

 

Consider the latest management information and security threat assessments.assessments

 

 

Drive forward mitigating action to protect the Group from potential threats.threats

 

 

Provide guidance to the design and effectiveness of the overall Barclays Security Risk framework.framework

 

 

Ensure all Security Risksecurity risk workstreams have been effectively integrated and implemented.implemented

 

 

Monitor corporate security profiles against the agreed plan, tracking issues in order that remedial action can be taken.taken


 

96 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 121


LOGOLOGO

Risk management

Statistical information

Statistical information

Statistical and other risk information

This section of the report contains supplementary information that is more detailed or contains longer histories than the data presented in the discussion. For commentary on this information, please refer to the preceding text (pages 7467 to 85)105).

Barclays applied International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) with effect from 1st January 2004, with the exception of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4, which were applied from 1st January 2005.

Credit risk management

Table 1: Risk Tendency by business        
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
UK Retail Banking  520  470
Barclays Commercial Bank  400  305
Barclaycard  1,475  955
GRCB – Western Europe  270  135
GRCB – Emerging Markets  350  140
GRCB – Absa  255  190
Barclays Capital  415  140
Barclays Wealth  20  10
Head office functions and other operationsa  5  10
Risk Tendency by business  3,710  2,355

Table 2: Loans and advances        
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
Retail businesses    

Customers

  201,588  162,081
Total retail businesses  201,588  162,081
Wholesale businesses    

Banks

  47,758  40,123

Customers

  266,750  187,086
Total wholesale businesses  314,508  227,209
Loans and advances  516,096  389,290

Table 1: Risk Tendency by business (page 78)Note

 

   

2007  

£m  

     

2006  

£m  

    

UK Banking

 775     790    

  UK Retail Banking

 470     500    

  Barclays Commercial Bank

 305     290    

Barclaycard

 945     1,135    

International Retail and Commercial Banking

 475     220    

  International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa

 220     75    

  International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa

 255     145    

Barclays Capital

 140     95    

Barclays Wealth

 10     10    

Head office functions and other operationsa

 10      10     

Risk Tendency by business

 2,355      2,260     

 

Table 2: Loans and advances

 

      
   

2007  

£m  

     

2006  

£m  

    

Retail businesses

      

  Banks

 –     –    

  Customers

 164,062     139,350    
     

Total retail businesses

 164,062      139,350     

Wholesale businesses

      

  Banks

 40,123     30,930    

  Customers

 185,105     146,281    
     

Total wholesale businesses

 225,228      177,211     

Loans and advances

 389,290      316,561     

Note

aHead office functions and other operations comprises discontinued business in transition.

 

122

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

97


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 3: Maturity analysis of loans and advances to banks
At 31st December 2008  On demand
£m
  Not more
than three
months
£m
  Over three
months
but not
more than
six months
£m
  

Over six
months but

not more

than one

year

£m

  

Over one
year

but not
more than
three years
£m

  

Over three
years

but not
more than
five years
£m

  Over five
years
but not
more than
ten years
£m
  Over
ten years
£m
  Total
£m
United Kingdom  127  6,474  193  163  232      343  7,532
Other European Union  1,210  10,458  54  415  407  50  5  1  12,600
United States  1,310  11,215  7  676  324      84  13,616
Africa  584  595  51  1  51  861  8  38  2,189
Rest of the World  1,652  6,957  201  666  884  943  39  479  11,821
   4,883  35,699  506  1,921  1,898  1,854  52  945  47,758

At 31st December 2007

  

On demand

£m

  

Not more
than three
months

£m

  

Over three
months
but not

more than
six months

£m

  

Over six
months but
not more
than one
year

£m

  

Over one
year

but not
more than
three years

£m

  

Over three
years

but not
more than
five years

£m

  

Over five
years
but not
more than
ten years

£m

  

Over
ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

United Kingdom  796  4,069  56  92  114  20  1  370  5,518
Other European Union  2,977  7,745  74  88  95  116  7    11,102
United States  321  5,736  95  1,255  343  98  5,498  97  13,443
Africa  283  1,260  131  114  196  439  158    2,581
Rest of the World  1,505  3,336  90  1,640  512  362  15  19  7,479
Loans and advances to banks  5,882  22,146  446  3,189  1,260  1,035  5,679  486  40,123

Table 4: Interest rate sensitivity of loans and advances
    2008  2007
At 31st December  

Fixed

rate

£m

  

Variable

rate

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Fixed

rate

£m

  

Variable

rate

£m

  

Total

£m

Banks  12,101  35,657  47,758  16,447  23,676  40,123
Customers  98,404  369,934  468,338  77,861  271,306  349,167

Table 5: Loans and advances to customers by industry
At 31st December  

2008

£m

  2007
7£m
  

2006

£m

  

2005

£m

  

2004a

£m

Financial services  114,069  71,160  45,954  43,102  25,132
Agriculture, forestry and fishing  3,281  3,319  3,997  3,785  2,345
Manufacturing  26,374  16,974  15,451  13,779  9,044
Construction  8,239  5,423  4,056  5,020  3,278
Property  22,155  17,018  16,528  16,325  8,992
Government  5,301  2,036  2,426  1,718  
Energy and water  14,101  8,632  6,810  6,891  3,709
Wholesale and retail, distribution and leisure  20,208  18,216  15,490  17,760  11,099
Transport  8,612  6,258  5,586  5,960  3,742
Postal and communication  7,268  5,404  2,180  1,313  834
Business and other services  37,373  30,363  26,999  22,529  23,223
Home loansb  135,384  106,751  92,477  85,206  79,164
Other personal  53,087  46,423  37,535  39,866  29,293
Finance lease receivables  12,886  11,190  10,142  9,088  6,938
Loans and advances to customers excluding reverse repurchase agreements  468,338  349,167  285,631  272,342  206,793
Reverse repurchase agreements  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  58,304
Loans and advances to customers  468,338  349,167  285,631  272,342  265,097

Notes

 

Table 3: Maturity analysis of loans and advances to banks

At 31st December 2007  

On demand

£m

  

Not more
than three
months

£m

  

Over three
months but
not more
than six
months

£m

  

Over six
months but
not more
than one
year

£m

  

Over one
year
but not
more than
three
years

£m

  

Over three
years
but not
more than
five years

£m

 ��

Over five
years
but not
more
than ten
years

£m

  

Over
ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

United Kingdom  796  4,069  56  92  114  20  1  370  5,518
Other European Union  2,977  7,745  74  88  95  116  7    11,102
United States  321  5,736  95  1,255  343  98  5,498  97  13,443
Africa  283  1,260  131  114  196  439  158    2,581
Rest of the World  1,505  3,336  90  1,640  512  362  15  19  7,479

 

Loans and advances to banks

  5,882  22,146  446  3,189  1,260  1,035  5,679  486  40,123

At 31st December 2006  

On demand

£m

  

Not more
than three
months

£m

  

Over three
months
but not
more than
six months

£m

  

Over six
months
but not
more than
one year

£m

  

Over one
year
but not
more than
three years

£m

  

Over three
years
but not
more than
five years

£m

  

Over five
years
but not
more than
ten years

£m

  

Over
ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

United Kingdom  524  5,211  110  18  43  10    313  6,229
Other European Union  619  7,514  90  130  81  78  1    8,513
United States  431  2,592  363  2,634  5  809  923  1,299  9,056
Africa  701  1,027  83  91  188  85  44    2,219
Rest of the World  612  2,465  154  191  1,278  148  44  21  4,913

 

Loans and advances to banks

  2,887  18,809  800  3,064  1,595  1,130  1,012  1,633  30,930

Table 4: Interest rate sensitivity of loans and advances

  2007  2006

At 31st December

  Fixed

rate

£m

  Variable

rate

£m

  Total

£m

  Fixed

rate

£m

  Variable

rate

£m

  Total

£m

Banks  16,447  23,676  40,123  12,176  18,754  30,930
Customers  77,861  271,306  349,167  66,000  219,631  285,631

Table 5: Loans and advances to customers by industry

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

  

2005

£m

  

2004a    

£m    

  

2003

£m

Financial services

  71,160  45,954  43,102  25,132      9,872

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  3,319  3,997  3,785  2,345      2,115

Manufacturing

  16,974  15,451  13,779  9,044      7,844

Construction

  5,423  4,056  5,020  3,278      2,534

Property

  17,018  16,528  16,325  8,992      6,728

Government

  2,036  2,426  1,718  –      

Energy and water

  8,632  6,810  6,891  3,709      3,150

Wholesale and retail, distribution and leisure

  17,768  15,490  17,760  11,099      9,628

Transport

  6,258  5,586  5,960  3,742      3,654

Postal and communication

  5,404  2,180  1,313  834      698

Business and other services

  30,363  26,999  22,529  23,223      13,913

Home loansb

  112,087  94,635  87,003  79,164      72,318

Other personal

  41,535  35,377  38,069  29,293      23,922

Overseas customersc

        –      8,666

Finance lease receivables

  11,190  10,142  9,088  6,938      5,877

Loans and advances to customers excluding reverse repurchase agreements

  349,167  285,631  272,342  206,793      170,919

Reverse repurchase agreements

  n/a  n/a  n/a  58,304      n/a

Trading business

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a      58,961

 

Loans and advances to customers

  349,167  285,631  272,342  265,097      229,880

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bExcludes commercial property mortgages.

 

cOverseas customers are now classified as part of other industry segments.

98 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 123


LOGOLOGO

 

Table 6: Loans and advances to customers in the UK
At 31st December  

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

  

2005

£m

  2004a
£m
Financial services  26,091  21,131  14,011  11,958  8,774
Agriculture, forestry and fishing  2,245  2,220  2,307  2,409  1,963
Manufacturing  11,340  9,388  9,047  8,469  5,684
Construction  4,278  3,542  2,761  3,090  2,285
Property  12,091  10,203  10,010  10,547  7,912
Government  20  201  6  6  
Energy and water  3,040  2,203  2,360  2,701  802
Wholesale and re tail distribution and leisure  14,421  13,800  12,951  12,747  9,356
Transport  3,467  3,185  2,745  2,797  1,822
Postal and communication  1,491  1,416  899  455  440
Business and other services  19,589  20,485  19,260  15,397  13,439
Home loansb  82,544  69,874  62,621  57,382  61,348
Other personal  31,490  28,691  27,617  30,598  26,872
Finance lease receivables  3,911  4,008  3,923  5,203  5,551
Loans and advances to customers in the UK  216,018  190,347  170,518  163,759  146,248

Table 6: Loans and advances to customersincluded in the UK

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a    
£m    
  2003
£m

 

Financial services

  21,131  14,011  11,958  8,774      7,721

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  2,220  2,307  2,409  1,963      1,766

Manufacturing

  9,388  9,047  8,469  5,684      5,967

Construction

  3,542  2,761  3,090  2,285      1,883

Property

  10,203  10,010  10,547  7,912      6,341

Government

  201  6  6  –      

Energy and water

  2,203  2,360  2,701  802      1,286

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  13,800  12,951  12,747  9,356      8,886

Transport

  3,185  2,745  2,797  1,822      2,579

Postal and communication

  1,416  899  455  440      476

Business and other services

  20,485  19,260  15,397  13,439      12,030

Home loansb

  71,755  64,150  58,730  61,348      61,905

Other personal

  26,810  26,088  29,250  26,872      21,905

Overseas customersc

        –      5,477

Finance lease receivables

  4,008  3,923  5,203  5,551      5,587

 

Loans and advances to customers in the UK

  190,347  170,518  163,759  146,248      143,809

The category ‘other personal’ now includes credit cards,above table for the years 2004 to 2007 have been reanalysed between wholesale and retail distribution and leisure, Home loans, and Other personal loans, second liens and personal overdrafts.to reflect changes in classification of assets.

The industry classifications in Tables 5-97-9 have been prepared at the level of the borrowing entity. This means that a loan to the subsidiary of a major corporation is classified by the industry in which the subsidiary operates, even though the parent’s predominant business may be in a different industry.

Table 7: Loans and advances to customers in other European Union countries

  IFRS  UK GAAP
Table 7: Loans and advances to customers in other European Union countriesTable 7: Loans and advances to customers in other European Union countries
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a    
£m    
  2003
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m

Financial services

  7,585  5,629  3,982  2,419      1,205  14,218  7,585  5,629  3,982  2,419

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  141  786  155  280      147  216  141  786  155  280

Manufacturing

  4,175  3,147  2,254  2,021      1,275  8,700  4,175  3,147  2,254  2,021

Construction

  1,159  639  803  716      609  1,786  1,159  639  803  716

Property

  2,510  2,162  3,299  344      346  4,814  2,510  2,162  3,299  344

Government

    6    –        1,089    6    

Energy and water

  2,425  2,050  1,490  940      409  5,313  2,425  2,050  1,490  940

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  1,719  776  952  810      426  2,653  1,719  776  952  810

Transport

  1,933  1,465  1,695  640      566  2,603  1,933  1,465  1,695  640

Postal and communication

  662  580  432  111      40  962  662  580  432  111

Business and other services

  3,801  2,343  3,594  3,795      1,251  5,490  3,801  2,343  3,594  3,795

Home loansb

  24,115  18,616  16,488  11,828      10,334  33,644  21,405  18,202  16,114  11,828

Other personal

  3,905  3,672  1,909  1,369      1,769  7,247  6,615  4,086  2,283  1,369

Overseas customersc

        –      438

Finance lease receivables

  2,403  1,559  1,870  937      212  3,328  2,403  1,559  1,870  937

Loans and advances to customers in other European Union countries

  56,533  43,430  38,923  26,210      19,027  92,063  56,533  43,430  38,923  26,210

See note under Table 6.

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005. The 2004 analysis excludes reverse repurchase agreements.

 

bExcludes commercial property mortgages.

cOverseas customers are now classified as part of other industry segments.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

99


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 8: Loans and advances to customers in the United States

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  

2004a    

£m    

  2003
£m

 

Financial services

  29,342  17,516  16,229  9,942      919

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  2  2  1  –      1

Manufacturing

  818  519  937  388      341

Construction

  18  13  32  139      2

Property

  568  1,714  329  394      1

Government

  221  153  300  –      

Energy and water

  1,279  1,078  1,261  891      1,358

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  398  403  794  466      77

Transport

  137  128  148  186      468

Postal and communication

  2,446  36  236  63      153

Business and other services

  1,053  1,432  885  1,565      220

Home loansb

  458  349  2  5,768      

Other personal

  3,256  2,022  1,443  845      

Finance lease receivables

  304  312  328  335      33

 

Loans and advances to customers in the United States

  40,300  25,677  22,925  20,982      3,573

See note under Table 6.

Table 9: Loans and advances to customers in Africa

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a    
£m    
  2003
£m

 

Financial services

  3,472  2,821  4,350  186      27

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  956  889  1,193  102      201

Manufacturing

  1,351  1,747  1,501  313      261

Construction

  637  591  1,068  76      40

Property

  2,433  1,987  1,673  87      40

Government

  967  785  625  –      

Energy and water

  356  156  193  184      97

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  1,326  1,050  2,774  165      239

Transport

  116  354  394  137      41

Postal and communication

  231  241  27  52      29

Business and other services

  1,285  2,631  1,258  1,012      412

Home loansb

  15,314  11,223  11,630  214      79

Other personal

  6,366  2,976  4,955  190      248

Finance lease receivables

  4,357  4,240  1,580  41      45

 

Loans and advances to customers in Africa

  39,167  31,691  33,221  2,759      1,759

See note under Table 6.

Table 10: Loans and advances to customers in the Rest of the World

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a    
£m    
  2003
£m

Loans and advances

  22,702  14,207  13,407  10,520      2,751

Finance lease receivables

  118  108  107  74      

Loans and advances to customers in the Rest of the World

  22,820  14,315  13,514  10,594      2,751

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005. The 2004 analysis excludes reverse repurchase agreements.

 

bExcludes commercial property mortgages.

 

100124 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 8: Loans and advances to customers in the United States
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
Financial services  56,006  29,342  17,516  16,229  9,942
Agriculture, forestry and fishing    2  2  1  
Manufacturing  2,171  818  519  937  388
Construction  21  18  13  32  139
Property  549  568  1,714  329  394
Government  336  221  153  300  
Energy and water  3,085  1,279  1,078  1,261  891
Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure  1,165  846  403  794  466
Transport  415  137  128  148  186
Postal and communication  3,343  2,446  36  236  63
Business and other services  2,279  1,053  1,432  885  1,565
Home loansb  17  10  349  2  5,768
Other personal  7,702  3,256  2,022  1,443  845
Finance lease receivables  298  304  312  328  335
Loans and advances to customers in the United States  77,387  40,300  25,677  22,925  20,982

See note under Table 6.

Table 9: Loans and advances to customers in Africa
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m

Financial services

  1,956  3,472  2,821  4,350  186

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  817  956  889  1,193  102

Manufacturing

  1,082  1,351  1,747  1,501  313

Construction

  2,053  637  591  1,068  76

Property

  3,485  2,433  1,987  1,673  87

Government

  1,741  967  785  625  

Energy and water

  118  356  156  193  184

Wholesale and re tail distribution and leisure

  1,012  1,326  1,050  2,774  165

Transport

  739  116  354  394  137

Postal and communication

  293  231  241  27  52

Business and other services

  4,699  1,285  2,631  1,258  1,012

Home loansb

  19,018  15,393  11,223  11,630  214

Other personal

  3,087  6,287  2,976  4,955  190

Finance lease receivables

  5,130  4,357  4,240  1,580  41

Loans and advances to customers in Africa

  45,230  39,167  31,691  33,221  2,759

See note under Table 6.

Table 10: Loans and advances to customers in the Rest of the World
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
Loans and advances  37,421  22,702  14,207  13,407  10,520
Finance lease receivables  219  118  108  107  74
Loans and advances to customers in the Rest of the World  37,640  22,820  14,315  13,514  10,594

Notes

 

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005. The 2004 analysis excludes reverse re purchase agreements.

Table 11: Maturity analysis of loans and advances to customers

bExcludes commercial property mortgages.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

125


LOGO

 

At 31st December 2007  On demand
£m
  Not more
than three
months
£m
  Over three
months
but not
more than
six months
£m
  Over six
months but
not more than
one year £m
  

Over one
year but
not more

than three
years
£m

  Over three
years
but not
more than
five years
£m
  

Over five
years

but not
more than
ten years
£m

  Over
ten years
£m
  Total
£m

United Kingdom

                  

Corporate lendinga

  26,557  15,737  2,453  3,834  8,474  8,358  10,718  11,643  87,774

Other lending to customers in the

United Kingdom

  4,384  4,717  2,106  3,597  11,517  8,699  19,325  48,228  102,573

Total United Kingdom

  30,941  20,454  4,559  7,431  19,991  17,057  30,043  59,871  190,347

Other European Union

  4,016  7,665  2,229  3,284  5,842  4,883  8,842  19,772  56,533

United States

  3,053  20,205  3,430  5,938  1,904  2,498  2,658  614  40,300

Africa

  6,806  4,243  881  1,969  5,568  4,124  2,285  13,291  39,167

Rest of the World

  1,085  9,733  1,695  859  2,223  2,586  3,685  954  22,820

Loans and advances

to customers

  45,901  62,300  12,794  19,481  35,528  31,148  47,513  94,502  349,167
 
At 31st December 2006  

On demand

£m

  Not more
than three
months
£m
  

Over three
months but
not more
than

six months
£m

  

Over six
months but not
more than one
year

£m

  

Over one
year but
not more
than three
years

£m

  

Over three
years

but not
more than
five years
£m

  

Over five
years

but not
more than
ten years
£m

  

Over

ten years
£m

  

Total

£m

United Kingdom

                  

Corporate lendinga

  22,923  13,569  2,262  2,850  7,562  8,499  8,349  10,342  76,356

Other lending to

customers in the
United Kingdom

  3,784  4,427  2,110  3,586  11,937  7,459  16,358  44,501  94,162

Total United Kingdom

  26,707  17,996  4,372  6,436  19,499  15,958  24,707  54,843  170,518

Other European Union

  2,137  6,254  1,744  2,869  4,783  4,397  6,565  14,681  43,430

United States

  2,489  11,630  1,689  3,402  1,949  1,871  1,464  1,183  25,677

Africa

  2,575  2,471  1,272  2,177  5,212  4,177  3,555  10,252  31,691

Rest of the World

  86  6,377  1,015  1,020  1,116  1,465  1,800  1,436  14,315
Loans and advances to customers  33,994  44,728  10,092  15,904  32,559  27,868  38,091  82,395  285,631

Table 12: Loans and advances in currencies other than the local currency of the borrower for countries where this exceeds 1% of total Group assets

Table 11: Maturity analysis of loans and advances to customers
At 31st December 2008  On demand
£m
  Not more
than three
months
£m
  Over three
months
but not
more than
six months
£m
  

Over six
months but
not more than
one year

£m

  

Over one
year but
not more
than three
years

£m

  

Over three
years

but not
more than
five years
£m

  

Over five
years

but not
more than
ten years
£m

  

Over
ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

United Kingdom                  
Corporate lending  24,790  14,715  1,574  3,259  10,585  12,372  10,495  15,876  93,666
Other lending to customers in the                  
United Kingdom  4,560  6,264  2,495  4,477  16,604  10,541  21,913  55,498  122,352
Total United Kingdom  29,350  20,979  4,069  7,736  27,189  22,913  32,408  71,374  216,018
Other European Union  5,254  17,618  2,707  5,681  11,808  10,272  10,138  28,585  92,063
United States  6,298  39,754  2,737  5,413  8,767  3,447  4,238  6,733  77,387
Africa  8,428  2,247  1,143  1,852  4,560  4,557  5,674  16,769  45,230
Rest of the World  3,832  8,150  2,167  1,545  9,267  4,008  5,666  3,005  37,640
Total  53,162  88,748  12,823  22,227  61,591  45,197  58,124  126,466  468,338

 

    As % of
assets
  Total
£m
  Banks
and other
financial
institutions
£m
  Governments
and official
institutions
£m
  Commercial
industrial
and other
private
sectors
£m

At 31st December 2007

United States

  2.1  26,249  7,151  6  19,092

 

At 31st December 2006

          

United States

  1.7  16,579  7,307  89  9,183

 

At 31st December 2005

          

United States

  2.6  24,274  15,693    8,581
At 31st December 2007  On demand
£m
  Not more
than three
months
£m
  

Over three
months
but not

more than
six months
£m

  

Over six
months but

not more
than one
year

£m

  

Over one
year but
not more
than three
years

£m

  

Over three
years

but not
more than
five years
£m

  

Over five
years

but not
more than
ten years
£m

  Over
ten years
£m
  

Total

£m

United Kingdom                  
Corporate lending  26,557  15,737  2,453  3,834  8,474  8,358  10,718  11,643  87,774
Other lending to customers in the                  
United Kingdom  4,384  4,717  2,106  3,597  11,517  8,699  19,325  48,228  102,573
Total United Kingdom  30,941  20,454  4,559  7,431  19,991  17,057  30,043  59,871  190,347
Other European Union  4,016  7,665  2,229  3,284  5,842  4,883  8,842  19,772  56,533
United States  3,053  20,205  3,430  5,938  1,904  2,498  2,658  614  40,300
Africa  6,806  4,243  881  1,969  5,568  4,124  2,285  13,291  39,167
Rest of the World  1,085  9,733  1,695  859  2,223  2,586  3,685  954  22,820
Loans and advances to customers  45,901  62,300  12,794  19,481  35,528  31,148  47,513  94,502  349,167

Table 12: Foreign outstandings in currencies other than the local currency

of the borrower for countries where this exceeds 1% of total Group assets

    As %
of
assets
  Total
£m
  Banks and
other
financial
institutions
£m
  Governments
and official
institutions
£m
  

Commercial
industrial
and other
private
sectors

£m

At 31st December 2008          
United States  3.1  63,614  16,724  2  46,888
Cayman Islands  1.2  23,765  271    23,494
At 31st December 2007          
United States  2.1  26,249  7,151  6  19,092
At 31st December 2006          
United States  1.7  16,579  7,307  89  9,183

At 31st December 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, there were no countries where Barclays had cross-currency loans to borrowers between 0.75% and 1% of total Group assets.

Note

aIn the UK, finance lease receivables are included in ‘Other lending’, although some leases are to corporate customers.

 

126

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

101


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 13: Off-balance sheet and other credit exposures as at 31st December
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
Off-balance sheet exposures      
Contingent liabilities  66,310  45,774  39,419
Commitments  260,816  192,639  205,504
On-balance sheet exposures      
Trading portfolio assets  185,637  193,691  177,867
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  54,542  56,629  31,799
Derivative financial instruments  984,802  248,088  138,353
Available for sale financial investments  64,976  43,072  51,703

Table 14: Notional principal amounts of credit derivatives as at 31st December
    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Credit derivatives held or issued for trading purposesa  4,129,244  2,472,249  1,224,548

Table 15: Credit risk loans summary
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004b
£m
Impaired loansc  12,264  8,574  4,444  4,550  n/a
Non-accruing loans  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,115
Accruing loans where interest is being suspended with or without provisions  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  492
Other accruing loans against which provisions have been made  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  943
Subtotal  12,264  8,574  4,444  4,550  3,550
Accruing loans which are contractually overdue 90 days or more as to principal or interest  2,953  794  598  609  550
Impaired and restructured loans  483  273  46  51  15
Credit risk loans  15,700  9,641  5,088  5,210  4,115

Notes

 

Table 13: Off-balance sheet and other credit exposures as at 31st December

   2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

 

Off-balance sheet exposures

      

Contingent liabilities

  45,774  39,419  47,143

Commitments

  192,639  205,504  203,785

On-balance sheet exposures

      

Trading portfolio assets

  193,691  177,867  155,723

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  56,629  31,799  12,904

Derivative financial instruments

  248,088  138,353  136,823

Available for sale financial investments

  43,072  51,703  53,497

Table 14: Notional principal amounts of credit derivatives as at 31st December

   2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m

Credit derivatives held or issued for trading purposesa

  2,472,249  1,224,548  609,381

 

Total

  2,472,249  1,224,548  609,381

Table 15: Credit risk loans summary

   IFRS  UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004b    
£m    
  2003
£m

Impaired loansc

  8,574  4,444  4,550  n/a      n/a

Non-accruing loans

  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,115      2,261

Accruing loans where interest is being suspended with or without provisions

  n/a  n/a  n/a  492      629

Other accruing loans against which provisions have been made

  n/a  n/a  n/a  943      821

Subtotal

  8,574  4,444  4,550  3,550      3,711

Accruing loans which are contractually overdue 90 days or more as to principal or interest

  794  598  609  550      590

Impaired and restructured loans

  273  46  51  15      4

 

Credit risk loans

  9,641  5,088  5,210  4,115      4,305

Notes

aIncludes credit derivatives held as economic hedges which are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

 

b2004 does not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

cIncludes £3,344m£4,117m (2007: £3,344m) of ABS CDO Super Senior exposures.

 

102 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 127


LOGO

Table 16: Credit risk loans               
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004 a
£m

Impaired loans: b

          

United Kingdom

  3,793  3,605  3,340  2,965  n/a

Other European Union

  1,713  472  410  345  n/a

United States

  4,397  3,703  129  230  n/a

Africa

  1,996  757  535  831  n/a

Rest of the World

  365  37  30  179  n/a

Total

  12,264  8,574  4,444  4,550  n/a

Non-accrual loans:

          

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  1,509

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  243

United States

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  258

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  74

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  31

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,115

Accruing loans where interest is being suspended with or without provisions:

          

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  323

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  31

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  21

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  117

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  492

Other accruing loans against which provisions have been made:

          

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  865

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  27

United States

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  26

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  21

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  4

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  943

Accruing loans which are contractually overdue 90 days or more as to principal or interest:

          

United Kingdom

  1,656  676  516  539  513

Other European Union

  562  79  58  53  34

United States

  433  10  3    1

Africa

  172  29  21  17  1

Rest of the World

  130        1

Total

  2,953  794  598  609  550

Impaired and restructured loans:

          

United Kingdom

  367  179    5  2

Other European Union

  29  14  10  7  

United States

  82  38  22  16  13

Africa

    42  14  23  

Rest of the World

  5        

Total

  483  273  46  51  15

Total credit risk loans:

          

United Kingdom

  5,816  4,460  3,856  3,509  3,212

Other European Union

  2,304  565  478  405  335

United States

  4,912  3,751  154  246  298

Africa

  2,168  828  570  871  117

Rest of the World

  500  37  30  179  153

Credit risk loans

  15,700  9,641  5,088  5,210  4,115

Table 16: Credit risk loansNotes

 

   IFRS      UK GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  

2004a    

£m    

  2003
£m

 

Impaired loans:b

           

United Kingdom

  3,605  3,340  2,965  n/a      n/a

Other European Union

  472  410  345  n/a      n/a

United States

  3,703  129  230  n/a      n/a

Africa

  757  535  831  n/a      n/a

Rest of the World

  37  30  179  n/a      n/a

 

Total

  8,574  4,444  4,550  n/a      n/a

 

Non-accrual loans:

           

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  1,509      1,572

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  243      143

United States

  n/a  n/a  n/a  258      383

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  74      86

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  31      77

 

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,115      2,261

 

Accruing loans where interest is being suspended with or without provisions:

           

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  323      559

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  31      29

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  21      37

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  117      4

 

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  492      629

 

Other accruing loans against which provisions have been made:

           

United Kingdom

  n/a  n/a  n/a  865      760

Other European Union

  n/a  n/a  n/a  27      35

United States

  n/a  n/a  n/a  26      

Africa

  n/a  n/a  n/a  21      22

Rest of the World

  n/a  n/a  n/a  4      4

 

Total

  n/a  n/a  n/a  943      821

 

Accruing loans which are contractually overdue 90 days or more as to principal or interest:

           

United Kingdom

  676  516  539  513      566

Other European Union

  79  58  53  34      24

United States

  10  3    1      

Africa

  29  21  17  1      

Rest of the World

        1      

 

Total

  794  598  609  550      590

 

Impaired and restructured loans:

           

United Kingdom

  179    5  2      4

Other European Union

  14  10  7  –      

United States

  38  22  16  13      

Africa

  42  14  23  –      

 

Total

  273  46  51  15      4

 

Total credit risk loans:

           

United Kingdom

  4,460  3,856  3,509  3,212      3,461

Other European Union

  565  478  405  335      231

United States

  3,751  154  246  298      383

Africa

  828  570  871  117      145

Rest of the World

  37  30  179  153      85

Credit risk loans

  9,641  5,088  5,210  4,115      4,305

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bIncludes £3,344m£4,117m (2007: £3,344m) of ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures.

 

128

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

103


Risk management

Statistical information

 

Table 17: Potential problem loans

Table 17: Potential problem loans               
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m

United Kingdom

  883  419  465  640  658

Other European Union

  963  59  32  26  32

United States

  431  964  21  12  27

Africa

  140  355  240  248  67

Rest of the World

  39    3  3  14

Potential problem loansb

  2,456  1,797  761  929  798

 

   IFRS  UK
GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a  
£m     
  

2003

£m

 

United Kingdom

  419  465  640  658      989

Other European Union

  59  32  26  32      23

United States

  964  21  12  27      259

Africa

  355  240  248  67      53

Rest of the World

    3  3  14      3
Potential problem loansb  1,797  761  929  798       1,327

Table 18: Interest foregone on credit risk loans

Table 18: Interest foregone on credit risk loans         
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Interest income that would have been recognised under the original contractual terms

      

Interest in come that would have been recognised under the original contractual terms

      

United Kingdom

  340  357  304  244  340  357

Rest of the World

  91  70  52  235  91  70
Total  431  427  356  479  431  427

Interest income of approximately £195m (2007: £48m, (2006: £72m, 2005: £29m)2006: £72m) from such loans was included in profit, of which £72m (2007: £26m, (2006: £49m, 2005: £20m)2006: £49m) related to domestic lending and the remainder related to foreign lending.

In addition, a further £159m (2007: £113m, (2006: £98m, 2005: £76m)2006: £98m) was recognised arising from impaired loans. Following impairment, interest income is recognised using the original effective rate of interest which was used to discount the expected future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss. £54m (2007: £93m, (2006: £88m, 2005: £70m)2006: £88m) of this related to domestic impaired loans and the remainder related to foreign impaired loans.

Table 19: Analysis of impairment/provision charges                
At 31st December  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
 

Impairment charge/net specific provisions charge

        

United Kingdom

  1,817  1,593  1,880  1,382  1,021 

Other European Union

  587  123  92  75  102 

United States

  1,519  374  12  76  57 

Africa

  454  214  143  37  27 

Rest of the World

  207  2  (53) 4  103 

Impairment on loans and advances

  4,584  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,310 

Impairment on available for sale assets

  382  13  86  4  n/a 

Impairment on reverse repurchase agreements

  124         

Impairment charge

  5,090  2,319  2,160  1,578  1,310 

Total net specific provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a 

General provisions (release)/charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (206)

Other credit provisions charge/(release)

  329  476  (6) (7) (11)

Impairment/provision charges

  5,419  2,795  2,154  1,571  1,093 

Table 19: Analysis of impairment/provision chargesNotes

 

   IFRS  UK
GAAP
At 31st December  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a  
£m    
  

2003

£m

 

Impairment charge/net specific provisions charge

         

United Kingdom

  1,593  1,880  1,382  1,021      1,132

Other European Union

  123  92  75  102      37

United States

  374  12  76  57      84

Africa

  214  143  37  27      21

Rest of the World

  2  (53) 4  103      46

 

Impairment on loans and advances

  2,306  2,074  1,574  n/a      n/a

Impairment on available for sale assets

  13  86  4  n/a      n/a

 

Impairment charge

  2,319  2,160  1,578  n/a      n/a

 

Total net specific provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  1,310      1,320

General provisions (release)/charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  (206)      27

Other credit provisions charge/(release)

  476  (6) (7) (11)      

 

Impairment/provision charges

  2,795  2,154  1,571  1,093      1,347

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IASIA S 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bIncludes £951m£nil (2007: £951m) of ABS CDO Super Senior and SIV-lites exposures.

 

104 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 129


Table 20: Impairment/provisions charges ratios (‘Loan loss ratios’)LOGO

 

   IFRS      UK GAAP
    

2007

%

  

2006

%

  

2005

%

  2004 a  
%    
  

2003

%

Impairment/provisions charges as a percentage of average loans and advances for the year:

           

Specific provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.40      0.46

General provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  (0.07)      0.01

Impairment charge

  0.64  0.66  0.58  n/a      n/a

Total

  0.64  0.66  0.58  0.33      0.47

Amounts written off (net of recoveries)

  0.49  0.61  0.50  0.40      0.48

Table 21: Analysis of allowance for impairment/provision for bad and doubtful debts

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP
   2007

£m

  2006

£m

  2005

£m

  2004a  
£m    
  2003

£m

Impairment allowance/Specific provisions

           

United Kingdom

  2,526  2,477  2,266  1,683      1,856

Other European Union

  344  311  284  149      97

United States

  356  100  130  155      121

Africa

  514  417  647  70      79

Rest of the World

  32  30  123  90      80

Specific provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,147      2,233

General provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  564      795

Allowance for impairment provision balances

  3,772  3,335  3,450  2,711      3,028

Average loans and advances for the year

  357,853  313,614  271,421  328,134      285,963

Table 22: Allowance for impairment/provision balance ratios

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP
   2007

%

  2006

%

  2005

%

  2004 a  
%    
  2003

%

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at end of year as a percentage of loans and advances at end ofyear:           

Specific provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.62      0.77

General provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.16      0.27

Impairment balance

  0.97  1.05  1.14  n/a      n/a

Total

  0.97  1.05  1.14  0.78      1.04
Table 20: Impairment/provisions charges ratios (‘Loan loss ratios’)                
    2008
%
  2007
%
  2006
%
  2005
%
  2004a
%
 

Impairment/provisions charges as a percentage of average loans and advances for the year:

          

Specific provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.40 

General provisions charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (0.07)

Impairment charge

  1.01  0.64  0.66  0.58  n/a 

Total

  1.01  0.64  0.66  0.58  0.33 

Amounts written off (net of recoveries)

  0.61  0.49  0.61  0.50  0.40 

Notes

Table 21: Analysis of allowance for impairment/provision for bad and doubtful debts
    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

  

2005

£m

  2004a
£m

Impairment allowance/Specific provisions

          

United Kingdom

  2,947  2,526  2,477  2,266  1,683

Other European Union

  963  344  311  284  149

United States

  1,561  356  100  130  155

Africa

  857  514  417  647  70

Rest of the World

  246  32  30  123  90

Specific provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,147

General provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  564

Allowance for impairment provision balances

  6,574  3,772  3,335  3,450  2,711

Average loans and advances for the year

  453,413  357,853  313,614  271,421  328,134

Table 22: Allowance for impairment/provision balance ratios
    2008
%
  2007
%
  2006
%
  2005
%
  2004a
%

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at end of year as a percentage of loans and advances at end of year:

          

Specific provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.62

General provision balances

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  0.16

Impairment balance

  1.27  0.97  1.05  1.14  n/a

Total

  1.27  0.97  1.05  1.14  0.78

Note

 

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

130

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

105


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 23: Movements in allowance for impairment/provisions charge for bad and doubtful debts 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
 

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at beginning of year

  3,772  3,335  3,450  2,637  2,946 

Acquisitions and disposals

  307  (73) (23) 555  21 

Unwind of discount

  (135) (113) (98) (76) n/a 

Exchange and other adjustments

  791  53  (153) 125  (33)

Amounts written off

  (2,919) (1,963) (2,174) (1,587) (1,582)

Recoveries

  174  227  259  222  255 

Impairment/provision charged against profit b

  4,584  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,104 

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at end of year

  6,574  3,772  3,335  3,450  2,711 

Table 24: Amounts written off 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
 

United Kingdom

  (1,514) (1,530) (1,746) (1,302) (1,280)

Other European Union

  (162) (143) (74) (56) (63)

United States

  (1,044) (145) (46) (143) (50)

Africa

  (187) (145) (264) (81) (15)

Rest of the World

  (12)   (44) (5) (174)

Amounts written off

  (2,919) (1,963) (2,174) (1,587) (1,582)

Table 25: Recoveries
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m

United Kingdom

  131  154  178  160  217

Other European Union

  4  32  18  13  9

United States

  1  7  22  15  14

Africa

  36  34  33  16  4

Rest of the World

  2    8  18  11

Recoveries

  174  227  259  222  255

Notes

 

Table 23: Movements in allowance for impairment/provisions charge for bad and doubtful debts

   IFRS  UK GAAP 
   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004 a  
£m    
  2003
£m
 
 

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at beginning of year

  3,335  3,450  2,637  2,946      2,998 

Acquisitions and disposals

  (73) (23) 555  21      62 

Unwind of discount

  (113) (98) (76) n/a      n/a 

Exchange and other adjustments

  53  (153) 125  (33)      (18)

Amounts written off

  (1,963) (2,174) (1,587) (1,582)      (1,474)

Recoveries

  227  259  222  255      113 

Impairment/provision charged against profitb

  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,104      1,347 

Allowance for impairment/provision balance at end of year

  3,772  3,335  3,450  2,711      3,028 

Table 24: Amounts written off

 

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP 
   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004 a  
£m    
  2003
£m
 
 

United Kingdom

  (1,530) (1,746) (1,302) (1,280)      (1,175)

Other European Union

  (143) (74) (56) (63)      (54)

United States

  (145) (46) (143) (50)      (215)

Africa

  (145) (264) (81) (15)      (13)

Rest of the World

    (44) (5) (174)      (17)

Amounts written off

  (1,963) (2,174) (1,587) (1,582)      (1,474)
 

Table 25: Recoveries

 

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP 
   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004 a  
£m    
  2003
£m
 
 

United Kingdom

  154  178  160  217      95 

Other European Union

  32  18  13  9      7 

United States

  7  22  15  14      10 

Africa

  34  33  16  4      1 

Rest of the World

    8  18  11       

Recoveries

  227  259  222  255      113 

Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IASIA S 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bDoes not reflect the impairment of available for sale assets or other credit risk provisions.

 

106 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

131


LOGO

 


Table 26: Impairment allowances/provision charged against profit 
   2008
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004a
£m
 
 
New and in creased impairment allowance/specific provision charge:      
United Kingdom  2,160  1,960  2,253  1,763  1,358 
Other European Union  659  192  182  113  131 
United States  1,529  431  60  105  85 

Africa

  526  268  209  109  47 
Rest of the World  242  20  18  39  134 
  5,116  2,871  2,722  2,129  1,755 
Reversals of impairment allowance/specific provision charge:      
United Kingdom  (212) (213) (195) (221) (120)
Other European Union  (68) (37) (72) (25) (20)
United States  (9) (50) (26) (14) (14)
Africa  (36) (20) (33) (56) (16)
Rest of the World  (33) (18) (63) (17) (20)
  (358) (338) (389) (333) (190)

Recoveries

  (174) (227) (259) (222) (255)

Net impairment allowance/specific provision charge b

  4,584  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,310 

General provision (release)/charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  (206)

Net charge to profit

  4,584  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,104 

 

Table 26: Impairment allowances/provision charged against profit

Table 27: Total impairment/specific provision charges for bad and doubtful debts by industry 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
 

United Kingdom:

                

Financial services

  76  32  64  22  (1)

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  4    5  9   

Manufacturing

  118  72  1  120  28 

Construction

  15  14  17  14  10 

Property

  80  36  15  18  (42)

Energy and water

  1  1  (7) 1  3 

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  59  118  88  39  66 

Transport

  3  3  19  (27) (19)

Postal and communication

    15  15  3  (1)

Business and other services

  234  81  133  45  64 

Home loans

  28  1  4  (7) 17 

Other personal

  1,178  1,187  1,526  1,142  894 

Finance lease receivables

  21  33    3  2 
  1,817  1,593  1,880  1,382  1,021 

Overseas

  2,767  713  194  192  289 

Impairment/specific provision charges

  4,584  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,310 

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP 
    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004 a  
£m    
  

2003

£m

 

New and increased impairment allowance/specific provision charge:

        

United Kingdom

  1,960  2,253  1,763  1,358      1,373 

Other European Union

  192  182  113  131      57 

United States

  431  60  105  85      118 

Africa

  268  209  109  47      33 

Rest of the World

  20  18  39  134      47 
  2,871  2,722  2,129  1,755      1,628 

Reversals of impairment allowance/specific provision charge:

        

United Kingdom

  (213) (195) (221) (120)      (146)

Other European Union

  (37) (72) (25) (20)      (13)

United States

  (50) (26) (14) (14)      (24)

Africa

  (20) (33) (56) (16)      (10)

Rest of the World

  (18) (63) (17) (20)      (2)
  (338) (389) (333) (190)      (195)

Recoveries

  (227) (259) (222) (255)      (113)

Net impairment allowance/specific provision chargeb

  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,310      1,320 

General provision (release)/charge

  n/a  n/a  n/a  (206)      27 

Net charge to profit

  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,104      1,347 

Table 27: Total impairment/specific provision charges for bad and doubtful debts by industry

 

 

   IFRS  UK GAAP 
    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004 a  
£m    
  

2003

£m

 

United Kingdom:

        

Financial services

  32  64  22  (1)      13 

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

    5  9  –      (3)

Manufacturing

  72  1  120  28      79 

Construction

  14  17  14  10      (23)

Property

  36  15  18  (42)      (3)

Energy and water

  1  (7) 1  3      13 

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  118  88  39  66      38 

Transport

  3  19  (27) (19)      100 

Postal and communication

  15  15  3  (1)      1 

Business and other services

  81  133  45  64      76 

Home loans

  1  4  (7) 17      9 

Other personal

  1,187  1,526  1,142  894      757 

Overseas customersc

        –      66 

Finance lease receivables

  33    3  2      9 
  1,593  1,880  1,382  1,021      1,132 

Overseas

  713  194  192  289      188 

Impairment/specific provision chargesc

  2,306  2,074  1,574  1,310      1,320 

The category ‘other‘Other personal’ now includes credit cards, personal loans, second liens and personal overdrafts.

The industry classifications in Tables 27, 28 and 29 have been prepared at the level of the borrowing entity. This means that a loan

to the subsidiary of a major corporation is classified by the industry in which the subsidiary operates, even though the parent’s predominant business may be in a different industry.


Notes

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bDoes not reflect the impairment of available for sale assets , reverse repurchase agreements or other credit risk provisions.

 

cOverseas customers are now classified as part of other industry segments.
132

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 28: Allowance for impairment/specific provision for bad and doubtful debts by industry
    2008  2007  2006  2005  2004a
    £m  %  £m  %  £m  %  £m  %  £m  %

United Kingdom:

                    

Financial services

  81  1.2  103  2.7  67  2.0  26  0.8  7  0.3

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  1  0.0  5  0.1  17  0.5  12  0.3  4  0.2

Manufacturing

  185  2.8  65  1.7  85  2.5  181  5.2  37  1.7

Construction

  18  0.3  16  0.4  16  0.5  13  0.4  6  0.3

Property

  114  1.7  54  1.4  26  0.8  24  0.7  26  1.2

Energy and water

  1  0.0  1        18  0.5  23  1.0

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  43  0.7  102  2.7  81  2.4  99  2.9  70  3.3

Transport

    0.0  11  0.3  24  0.7  32  0.9  55  2.6

Postal and communication

  33  0.5  25  0.7  12  0.4  2  0.1  13  0.6

Business and other services

  236  3.6  158  4.2  186  5.6  102  3.0  105  4.9

Home loans

  46  0.7  15  0.4  10  0.3  50  1.4  58  2.7

Other personal

  2,160  32.9  1,915  50.8  1,953  58.6  1,696  49.2  1,265  58.9

Finance lease receivables

  29  0.4  56  1.5      11  0.3  14  0.7
  2,947  44.8  2,526  67.0  2,477  74.3  2,266  65.7  1,683  78.4

Overseas

  3,627  55.2  1,246  33.0  858  25.7  1,184  34.3  464  21.6

Total

  6,574  100.0  3,772  100.0  3,335  100.0  3,450  100.0  2,147  100.0

See note under Table 27.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

107
 


Risk management

Statistical information

Table 28: Allowance for impairment/specific provision for bad and doubtful debts by industry

   IFRS  UK GAAP
   2007  2006  2005  2004a  2003
   £m  %  £m  %  £m  %  £m  %      £m  %

United Kingdom:

                     

Financial services

  103  2.7  67  2.0  26  0.8  7  0.3      12  0.5

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  5  0.1  17  0.5  12  0.3  4  0.2      5  0.2

Manufacturing

  65  1.7  85  2.5  181  5.2  37  1.7      58  2.6

Construction

  16  0.4  16  0.5  13  0.4  6  0.3      7  0.3

Property

  54  1.4  26  0.8  24  0.7  26  1.2      3  0.1

Energy and water

  1        18  0.5  23  1.0      27  1.2

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  102  2.7  81  2.4  99  2.9  70  3.3      52  2.3

Transport

  11  0.3  24  0.7  32  0.9  55  2.6      103  4.6

Postal and communication

  25  0.7  12  0.4  2  0.1  13  0.6      15  0.7

Business and other services

  158  4.2  186  5.6  102  3.0  105  4.9      121  5.4

Home loans

  15  0.4  10  0.3  50  1.4  58  2.7      55  2.5

Other personalb

  1,915  50.8  1,953  58.6  1,696  49.2  1,265  58.9      1,359  60.9

Overseas customersc

                –      24  1.1

Finance lease receivables

  56  1.5      11  0.3  14  0.7      15  0.7
  2,526  67.0  2,477  74.3  2,266  65.7  1,683  78.4      1,856  83.1

Overseas

  1,246  33.0  858  25.7  1,184  34.3  464  21.6      377  16.9

Total

  3,772  100.0  3,335  100.0  3,450  100.0  2,147  100.0      2,233  100.0

See note under Table 27.

Table 29: Analysis of amounts written off and recovered by industry

  Amounts written off for the year  Recoveries of amounts previously written off
  IFRS  UK GAAP  IFRS  UK GAAP  Amounts written off for the year  Recoveries of amounts previously
written off
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a  
£m    
  2003    

£m    

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a  
£m    
  2003

£m

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004a
£m

United Kingdom:

                                           

Financial services

  6  13  2  7      14      1    1  3      12  88  6  13  2  7  4  1    1  3

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

  5  8  3  2      –      2  1    1      1  6  5  8  3  2    2  1    1

Manufacturing

  83  73  47  79      126      7  21  11  30      8  53  83  73  47  79  8  7  21  11  30

Construction

  23  17  15  13      19      3  2  1  2      14  19  23  17  15  13  2  3  2  1  2

Property

  16  23  4  2      5      10  6  1  69      1  27  16  23  4  2  2  10  6  1  69

Energy and water

    1  22  9      15        2    2        1    1  22  9      2    2

Wholesale and retail distribution and leisure

  109  120  85  55      45      12  14  25  7      5  137  109  120  85  55  7  12  14  25  7

Transport

  13  11  29  44      5        1  10  15      1  10  13  11  29  44  1    1  10  15

Postal and communication

  3  5  15  2      1            1        3  3  5  15  2          1

Business and other services

  83  124  83  96      58      22  17  14  16      11  153  83  124  83  96  10  22  17  14  16

Home loans

  1    2  19      11      1  7  4  5      3  4  1    2  19  1  1  7  4  5

Other personal

  1,164  1,351  992  948      790      96  107  92  65      38  960  1,164  1,351  992  948  88  96  107  92  65

Overseas customersb

        –      82            –      

Finance lease receivables

  24    3  4      4          1  1      1  53  24    3  4  8      1  1
  1,530  1,746  1,302  1,280      1,175      154  178  160  217      95  1,514  1,530  1,746  1,302  1,280  131  154  178  160  217

Overseas

  433  428  285  302      299      73  81  62  38      18  1,405  433  428  285  302  43  73  81  62  38

Total

  1,963  2,174  1,587  1,582      1,474      227  259  222  255      113  2,919  1,963  2,174  1,587  1,582  174  227  259  222  255

See note under Table 27.

NotesNote

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

bOverseas customers are now classified as part of other industry segments.

108 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

133


LOGO

 


Table 30: Total impairment allowance/(provision) coverage of credit risk loans
    2008
%
  2007
%
  2006
%
  2005
%
  2004a
%

United Kingdom

  50.7  56.6  64.2  64.6  68.1

Other European Union

  41.8  60.9  65.1  70.1  60.9

United States

  31.8  9.5  64.9  52.8  57.0

Africa

  39.5  62.1  73.2  74.3  68.4

Rest of the World

  49.2  86.5  100.0  68.7  71.9

Total coverage of credit risk loans

  41.9  39.1  65.6  66.2  66.9

Total coverage of credit risk loans excluding ABS CDO Super Senior exposure

  48.0  55.3  65.6  66.2  66.9

 

Table 30: Total impairment allowance/(provision) coverage of credit risk loans

   IFRS  UK GAAP
  2007  2006  2005  2004a 2003
   %  %  %  %  %

United Kingdom

  56.6  64.2  64.6  68.1  74.2

Other European Union

  60.9  65.1  70.1  60.9  71.4

United States

  9.5  64.9  52.8  57.0  39.2

Africa

  62.1  73.2  74.3  68.4  54.5

Rest of the World

  86.5  100.0  68.7  71.9  94.1

Total coverage of credit risk loans

  39.1  65.6  66.2  66.9  71.5

Total coverage of credit risk loans excluding ABS CDO Super Senior exposure

  55.6  65.6  66.2  66.9  71.5

Table 31: Total impairment allowance/(provision) coverage of potential credit risk lending (CRLs and PPLs)

   IFRS  UK GAAP
  2007  2006  2005  2004a 2003
   %  %  %  %  %

United Kingdom

  51.8  57.3  54.6  56.5  57.7

Other European Union

  55.1  61.0  65.9  55.6  65.0

United States

  7.6  57.1  50.4  52.3  23.4

Africa

  43.4  51.5  57.8  43.5  39.9

Rest of the World

  86.5  91.0  67.6  65.9  90.9

Total coverage of potential credit risk lending

  33.0  57.0  56.2  56.0  54.6

Total coverage of potential credit risk lenders excluding ABS CDO

Super Senior exposure

  

49.0

  57.0  56.2  

56.0

 

 

54.6

Table 31: Total impairment allowance/(provision) coverage of potential credit risk lending (CRLs and PPLs)
    2008
%
  2007
%
  2006
%
  2005
%
  2004a
%

United Kingdom

  44.0  51.8  57.3  54.6  56.5

Other European Union

  29.5  55.1  61.0  65.9  55.6

United States

  29.2  7.6  57.1  50.4  52.3

Africa

  37.1  43.4  51.5  57.8  43.5

Rest of the World

  45.5  86.5  91.0  67.6  65.9

Total coverage of potential credit risk lending

  36.2  33.0  57.0  56.2  56.0

Total coverage of potential credit risk lenders excluding ABS CDO Super Senior exposure

  39.6  47.7  57.0  56.2  56.0

Allowance coverage of credit risk loans and potential credit risk loans excluding the drawn ABS CDO Super Senior exposure decreased to 55.6%48.0% (31st December 2006: 65.6%2007: 55.3%) and 49.0%39.6% (31st December 2006: 57.0%2007: 47.7%), respectively. The decrease in these ratios reflected a change in the mix of credit risk loans and potential credit risk loans: unsecured retail exposures, where the recovery outlook is relatively low, decreased as a proportion of the total as the collections and underwriting processes were improved. Secured retail and wholesale and corporate exposures, where the recovery outlook is relatively high, increased as a proportion of credit risk loans and potential credit risk loans.

Allowance coverage of ABS CDO Super Senior credit risk loans was low relative to allowance coverage of other credit risk loans since substantial protection against loss is also provided by subordination and hedges. On ABS CDO Super Senior exposures, the combination of subordination, hedging and writedowns provide protection against loss levels to 72% on US sub-prime collateral as at 31st December 2007.Note

 

Note

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

134

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

109


Risk management

Supervision and regulation

 

Supervision and regulation

The Group’s operations, including its overseas offices, subsidiaries and associates, are subject to a significant body of rules and regulations includingthat are a condition for authorisation to conduct banking and financial services business and constrain business operations. These include reserve and reporting requirements and conduct of business regulations. These requirements are imposed by the relevant central banks and regulatory authorities.authorities that supervise the Group in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The requirements reflect global standards developed by, among others, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions. They also reflect requirements derived from EU directives.

In the UK, the FSA is the independent body responsible for the regulation of deposit taking, life insurance, home mortgages, general insurance and investment business. The FSA was established by the Government and it exercises statutory powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the FSA to carry on a range of regulated activities within the UK and is subject to consolidated supervision.supervision by the FSA. In its role as supervisor, the FSA seeks to ensure the safety and soundness of financial institutions with the aim of strengthening, but not guaranteeing, the protection of customers. The FSA’s continuing supervision of financial institutions authorised by it is conducted through a variety of regulatory tools, including the collection of information from statistical and prudential returns, reports obtained from skilled persons, visits to firms and regular meetings with management to discuss issues such as performance, risk management and strategy.

The FSA adopts a risk-based approach to supervision. The starting point for supervision of all financial institutions is a systematic analysis of the risk profile for each authorised firm. The FSA has adopted a homogeneous risk, processes and resourcing model in its approach to its supervisory responsibilities (known as the ARROW model) and the results of the risk assessment are used by the FSA to develop a risk mitigation programme for a firm. The FSA also promulgates requirements that banks and other financial institutions are required to meet on matters such as capital adequacy, limits on large exposures to individual entities and groups of closely connected entities, liquidity and rules of business conduct. Certain of these requirements derive from EU directives as described below.

Banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions in the UK are subject to a single financial services compensation scheme (the Financial Services Compensation Scheme) where an authorised firm is unable or is likely to be unable to meet claims made against it because of its financial circumstances. Different levels of compensation are available to eligible claimants depending upon whether the protected claim is in relation to a deposit, a contract of insurance or protected investment business and certain types of claims are subject to maximum levels of compensation. Most deposits made with branches of Barclays Bank PLC within the European Economic Area (EEA) which are denominated in Sterling or other EEA currencies (including the euro)Euro) are covered by the Scheme. Most claims made in respect of designated investment business will also be protected claims if the business was carried on from the UK or from a branch of the bank or investment firm in another EEA member state. The arrangements for compensating depositors and for dealing with failed banks are currently subject to consultation by the UK Tripartite Authorities – HM Treasury, the FSA and the Bank of England. The Government has committed to presenting proposals for legislation to Parliament on these matters in the course of 2008.

Outside the UK, the Group has operations (and main regulators) located in continental Europe, in particular France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal and Italy (local central banks and other regulatory authorities); Asia Pacific (various regulatory authorities including the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Financial Services Agency of Japan, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission , the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the Reserve Bank of India); Africa and the Middle East (various regulatory authorities including the South African Reserve Bank and the Financial Services Board and the regulatory authorities of the United Arab Emirates) and the United States of America (the(including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission).

In Europe, the UK regulatory agenda is considerably shaped and influenced by the directives emanating from the EU. A number of EU directives have recently been implemented, for example the Capital Requirements Directive and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (‘MiFID’). These form part of the European Single Market programme, an important feature of which is the framework for the regulation of authorised firms. This framework which continues to evolve, is designed to enable a credit institution or investment firm authorised in one EU member state to conduct banking or investment business through the establishment of branches or by the provision of services on a cross-border basis in

other member states without the need for local authorisation. Barclays operations in Europe are authorised and regulated by a combination of both home (the FSA) and host regulators.

Barclays operations in South Africa, including Absa Group Limited, are supervised and regulated by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) and the Financial Services Board (FSB). SARB oversees the banking industry and follows a risk-based approach to supervision whilst the FSB oversees the non-banking financial services industry and focuses on enhancing consumer protection and regulating market conduct.

In the United States, Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, and certainBarclays’ US banking subsidiaries and branches of the Bank are subject to a comprehensive regulatory structure involving numerous statutes, rules and regulations. Barclays branch operationsBank PLC’s branches in New York and Florida are licensed by, and subject to regulation and examination by, their respective licensing authorities, the New York State Banking Department and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation. Barclays Bank PLC also operates a federal agency in California that is licensed by and subject to regulation and examination by the OCC. Barclays Global Investors, NA is a federally-charteredfederally chartered trust company subject to regulation and examination by the OCC. Barclays Bank Delaware is a Delaware-chartered commercial bank subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Delaware State Banking Commissioner. In addition, the FRB is the primary US federal regulator for the New York and Florida branch operationsbranches and also exercises regulatory authority over Barclays other US operations. The regulation of Barclays and its US branches andbanking subsidiaries imposes restrictions on the activities of thoseBarclays, including its US banking subsidiaries and Barclays Bank PLC’s US branches and subsidiaries.agencies, as well as prudential restrictions, such as limits on extensions of credit by the Barclays Bank PLC’s US branches and agencies and the US banking subsidiaries to a single borrower and to Barclays subsidiaries and affiliates.

The licensing authority of each US branch has the authority, in certain circumstances, to take possession of the business and property of Barclays Bank PLC located in the state of the office it licenses. Such circumstances generally include violations of law, unsafe business practices and insolvency. As long as Barclays Bank PLC maintains one or more federal branches or agencies, the OCC also has the authority to take possession of the US operations of Barclays Bank PLC under similar circumstances, and this federal power may pre-empt the state insolvency regimes that would otherwise be applicable to Barclays Bank PLC’s state-licensed branches. As a result, if the OCC exercised its authority over the US agency of Barclays Bank PLC pursuant to federal law in the event of a Barclays Bank PLC insolvency, all of Barclays Bank PLC’s US assets would most likely be applied first to satisfy creditors of its US branches and agencies as a group, and then made available for application pursuant to any UK insolvency proceeding.

In addition to the direct regulation of Barclays US banking offices, Barclays US operations subject Barclays to regulation by the FRB under various laws, including the International Banking Act of 1978 and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (BHC Act). Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Group US Inc. are bank holding companies registered with the FRBFRB. Each has elected to be treated as well asa financial holding companiescompany under the BHC Act. Financial holding companies may engage in a broader range of financial and related activities than are permitted to banking organizationsorganisations that do not maintain financial holding company status, including underwriting and dealing in all types of securities. To maintain the financial holding company status of each of Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Group US Inc., Barclays Bank PLC is required to meet or exceed certain capital ratios and to be deemed to be “well managed”. and Barclays Bank Delaware and Barclays Global Investors, NA must also meet certain capital requirements and be deemed to be “well managed” and. Barclays Bank Delaware must also have at least a “satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

Barclays is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before acquiring, directly or indirectly, the ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of any US bank or bank holding company. Under current FRB policy, Barclays is required to act as a source of financial strength for Barclays Bank Delaware. This policy could, among other things, require Barclays to inject capital into any of its US banking subsidiaries if they become undercapitalised. A major focus of US governmental policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been combating money laundering and terrorist financing and enforcing compliance with US economic sanctions. Regulations applicable to US operations of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries impose obligations to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to ensure compliance with US economic sanctions against designated foreign


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

135


LOGO

countries, nationals and others. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programmes to combat money laundering and terrorist financing or to ensure economic sanction compliance could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. See Financial Statement Note 36 for further discussion of competition and regulatory matters.

Another recent focus of US governmental policy relating to the financial services sector generally has been on disclosure and sales practices relating to the sector’s subprime mortgage and other lending.

Barclays investment banking operations are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including:

 

Trade practices among broker-dealers

Sales Methods

 

Capital structure

Trade practices among broker-dealers

 

Record-keeping

Use and safekeeping of customers’ funds and securities

 

The financing of customers’ purchases

Capital structure

 

Record-keeping

The financing of customers’ purchases

Procedures for compliance with US securities law

The conduct of directors, officers and employees

Barclays Capital Inc. and the other subsidiaries that conduct these operations are regulated by a number of different government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Institution Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Depending upon the specific nature of a broker-dealer’s business, it may also be regulated by some or FINRA.all of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the US Department of the Treasury, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and other exchanges of which it may be a member. In addition, the US states, provinces and territories have local securities commissions that regulate and monitor activities in the interest of investor protection. These regulators have available a variety of sanctions, including the authority to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of the entity or its directors, officers or employees.

Barclays subsidiaries in the US are also subject to regulation by applicable federal and state regulators of their activities in the asset management, investment advisory, mutual fund and mortgage lending businesses.

Regulatory Developments

In the wake of the financial crisis there will be regulatory change that will have a substantial impact on all financial institutions, including the Group. The full extent of this impact is not yet clear. Programmes to reform the global regulatory framework were agreed first by G8 Finance Ministers in April 2008 and subsequently by G20 Heads of Government in November 2008. In the EU, Finance Ministers agreed a roadmap for regulatory reform in May 2008. There is a substantial degree of commonality to these programmes covering issues of capital and liquidity regulation, risk management and accounting standards. These programmes will be further developed and implemented in 2009.

In the UK, in response to the financial crisis, the Chairman of the FSA has been requested by the Chancellor of the Exchequer to undertake a review of banking regulation. The Chancellor has indicated that he will be presenting a White Paper on the supervision of banking in spring 2009 with the expectation that proposals for legislation will be presented to Parliament. He has also commissioned Sir David Walker to review the corporate governance of the UK banking industry. The results of this review are expected before the end of 2009. The FSA has re-examined its regulatory requirements and processes, substantially increasing regulatory capital requirements in October 2008. It has also been undertaking a Supervisory Enhancement Programme that will increase both the resources devoted to supervision and the intensity of supervision.

On 21st February 2009, the Banking Act 2009 came into force which provides a permanent regime to allow the FSA, the UK Treasury and the Bank of England (the ‘Tripartite Authorities’) to resolve failing banks in the UK. The Banking Act aims to balance the need to protect depositors and prevent systemic failure with the potentially adverse consequences that using powers to deal with those events could have on private law rights, and, as a consequence, wider markets and investor confidence.

These powers, which apply regardless of any contractual restrictions, include (a) power to issue share transfer orders pursuant to which there may be transferred to a commercial purchaser or Bank of England entity, all or some of the securities issued by a bank. The share transfer order can extend to a wide range of ‘securities’ including shares and bonds issued by a UK Bank (including Barclays Bank PLC) or its holding company (Barclays PLC) and warrants for such and (b) the power to transfer all or some of the property, rights and liabilities of the UK bank to a purchaser or Bank of England entity. In certain circumstances encumbrances and trusts can be over-reached. Power also exists to override any default provisions in transactions otherwise affected by these powers. Compensation may be payable in the context of both share transfer orders and property appropriation. In the case of share transfer orders any compensation will be paid to the person who held the security immediately before the transfer, who may not be the encumbrancer.

The Banking Act also vests power in the Bank of England to override, vary or impose contractual obligations between a UK bank or its holding company and its former group undertakings (as defined in the Banking Act), for reasonable consideration, in order to enable any transferee or successor bank of the UK bank to operate effectively. There is also power for the Treasury to amend the law (save for a provision made by or under the Banking Act) by order for the purpose of enabling it to use the special resolution regime powers effectively, potentially with retrospective effect. The Banking Act also gives the Bank of England statutory responsibility for financial stability in the UK and for the oversight of payment systems.

Amendments are being made to the EU framework of directives, including to the Capital Requirements Directive and to the Directive on Deposit Guarantee Schemes. Further amendments to EU regulatory requirements are likely as the EU develops its response to the financial crisis, including the structure of the regulatory system in Europe as proposed in the report of a high-level Commission group published on 25 February 2009.

In the United States, the FDIC has established a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) for eligible institutions including, among others, US bank holding companies and FDIC-insured depository institutions, unless they opted out. Under the TLGP, the FDIC will insure the entire amount of non-interest bearing transaction account deposits of eligible institutions until December 31, 2009 and certain senior unsecured debt of eligible institutions issued before June 30, 2009.Barclays Bank Delaware and Barclays Group US, Inc. are eligible to participate in the TLGP, and they have opted in. Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC, as non-US banks or bank holding companies, are not eligible to participate in the TLGP. The US Department of the Treasury has invested approximately $250 billion in the capital of US depository institutions and depository institution holding companies through a Capital Purchase Program authorized under the US Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and is expected to continue to make capital investments under the authority of this act. Barclays, as a non-US institution, is not eligible for capital investments by the US Treasury under existing programs.

Another recent focus of US governmental policy relating to the financial services sector generally has been on disclosure and sales practices relating to the sector’s subprime mortgage and other lending.

In addition, in the United States, as elsewhere, recent market disruptions and economic conditions have led to numerous proposals for changes and significant increases in the regulation of the financial services industry. However, given the current environment and status of such proposals, it is difficult to determine the nature and form of any regulation that may arise in the United States from any such proposals.


136

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Governance

 

110Board and Executive Committee  

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

138
Governance
Board and Executive committee112
Directors’ report  114140
Corporate governance report  117143
Remuneration report  128157
Accountability and audit  143173

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

111


Board and Executive Committee

1.Marcus1. Marcus Agius

Group Chairman (Age 61)(Age 62)

Marcus has an extensive background in banking, having worked at Lazard from 1972 to 2006. He also has experience of chairing large organisations, including BAA plc and Lazard in London. Marcus is Senior Independent Director of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).

Term of officeMarcus joined the Board on 1stin September 2006 as a non-executive Director and succeeded Matthew Barrett aswas appointed Group Chairman fromon 1st January 2007. Marcus iswas last re-elected by shareholders at the senior non-executiveAGM in 2007, following his appointment.

Independent On appointment

External appointments Senior Independent Director of the BBC and was Chairman of Lazard in London and a Deputy Chairman of Lazard LLC until 31st Decembersince 2006. He was formerly Chairman of BAA PLC, a position he held from 2002 until December 2006. Marcus is Trustee to the Board of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew andKew. Chairman of The Foundation and Friends of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Marcus isChairman of Lazard in London and Deputy Chairman of Lazard LLC until 2006. Chairman of BAA plc until 2006.

Committee membership Chairman of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and a membersince January 2007. Member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee.Committee since January 2007.

2.David2. David Booth

Non-executive Director (Age 53)(Age 54)

David joined the Board on 1st May 2007. He became a member of the Board Risk Committee on 1st January 2008. He currently manages his own venture capital investments, having retired from the Management Committee of Morgan Stanley in 1997. David was employed by Morgan Stanley from 1982 to 1992, and again from 1995 to 1997. He held various positions there, including Head of Government Bond Trading, Head of Mortgage Trading, Sales and Finance and Head of Global Operations and Technology. In 1992-93, he

Term of office David joined the Board in May 2007. David was President and alast re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2008, following his appointment.

Independent Yes

External appointments Director of Discount Corporation of New York. In 1994-95, he was a consultant to Morgan Stanley regarding the relocation of its New York City headquarters. David is also aEast Ferry Investors, Inc., Trustee of the Brooklyn Botanic Garden andGarden. Chair of itsthe Brooklyn Botanic Garden Investment Committee. Various positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. until 1997. Discount Corporation of New York until 1993.

3.SirCommittee membership Member of the Board Risk Committee since January 2008.

3. Sir Richard Broadbent

Senior Independent Director (Age 54)(Age 55)

Sir Richard joinedhas experience of both the Boardprivate and public sector having worked in September 2003.high-level banking roles and the Civil Service. He was appointed Senior Independent Director on 1st September 2004. Sir Richard is Chairman of Arriva PLC and was previously the Executive Chairman of HM Customs and Excise from 2000 to 2003. He2003 and was formerly a member of the Group Executive Committee of Schroders PLC and a non-executive Director of the Securities Institute. Sir Richard is Chairman of Arriva PLC.

Term of office Sir Richard joined the Board in September 2003 and was appointed Senior Independent Director on 1st September 2004. Sir Richard was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2006.

Independent Yes

External appointments Chairman of Arriva PLC since 2004. Executive Chairman of HM Customs and Excise until 2003. Former Group Executive Committee member of Schroders PLC. Non-executive Director of the Securities Institute until 1995.

Committee membership Chairman of the Board Risk Committee andsince January 2006 (member since April 2004). Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. He is also a memberCommittee since January 2007 (member since April 2004). Member of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee.Committee since September 2004.

4.Leigh4. Leigh Clifford, AO

Non-executive Director (Age 60)(Age 61)

Leigh joinedis Chairman of Qantas Airways Limited. He previously worked for the Board on 1st October 2004. He joined Rio Tinto in 1970 andGroup, where he was a Director of Rio Tinto PLC from 1994 and Rio Tinto Limited from 1995 and was Chief Executive of the Rio Tinto Group from 2000 until May 2007.

Term of office Leigh joined the Board in October 2004. Leigh was appointed tolast re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007.

Independent Yes

External appointments Chairman of Qantas Airways Limited since November 2007. Member of the Bechtel Board of Counsellors insince May 2007 and as a non-executive2007. Senior Adviser to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co since January 2009. Director of Qantas Airways in Septemberthe Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. Board Member of the National Gallery of Victoria Foundation. Chief Executive of Rio Tinto until 2007. He became ChairmanDirector of Qantas in November 2007. He is a memberFreeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc. until 2004.

Committee membership Member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee and a membersince July 2005. Member of the Barclays Asia Pacific Advisory Committee.

5.Fulvio5. Fulvio Conti

Non-executive Director (Age 60)(Age 61)

Fulvio joined the Board on 1st April 2006. Fulvio is currently Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Enel SpA, the Italian energy group, a positionwhere he has held since May 2005. He becamewas previously Chief Financial Officer from 1999-2005. Fulvio has held a number of Enel SpA in 1999. Fulvio was formerlyhigh-level financial roles, including Chief Financial Officer and General Manager of Telecom Italia and between 1996 and 1998 was General Manager and Chief Financial Officer of

Ferrovie dello Stato, the Italian national railway. From 1991 to 1993 heHe was also head of the accounting, finance and control department of Montecatini and was subsequently in charge of finance at Montedison-Compart, overseeing the financial restructuring of the group. He has been a non-executiveheld positions in finance and operations in various affiliates of Mobil Oil Corporation in Italy and Europe.

Term of office Fulvio joined the Board in April 2006. Fulvio was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2008.

Independent Yes

External appointments Chief Executive of Enel SpA since 2005. Director of AON Corporation since January 2008. Fulvio is a memberChief Financial Officer and General Manager of Telecom Italia until 1999. General Manager and Chief Financial Officer of Ferrovie dello Stato until 1998.

Committee membership Member of the Board Audit Committee.

6.Dr Daniël CronjéCommittee since September 2006.

Non-executive Director (Age 61)

Daniël joined the Board on 1st September 2005 following the acquisition by Barclays of a majority stake in Absa, where he was Chairman. Daniël joined Absa in 1987 and was formerly Deputy Chief Executive and Group Chief Executive until 1997. He joined Volkskas in 1975 and held various positions in Volkskas Merchant Bank and Volkskas Group. Daniël retired as Chairman of Absa on 1st July 2007 and from the Absa Board on 31st July 2007. He is currently a Director of TSB Sugar RSA Limited and Sappi Limited. He is a member of the Board Risk Committee. Daniël does not intend to seek re-election at the 2008 Annual General Meeting and will therefore leave the Board at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting in April 2008.

7.Professor6. Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

Non-executive Director (Age 61)(Age 62)

Sandra joined the Board in March 2003. She is currently KPMG Professor of Management Studies at the University of Cambridge and has been Master of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge since1999. She is also a Trustee and Director of Oxfam, and is a member of the UK-India Round Table, the Advisory Board of UK India Business Council and Chair of the Executive Steering Committee of the Advanced Institute of Management. Until September 2006,Cambridge. Sandra was Director of the Judge Business School at Cambridge a positionuntil September 2006 and she had held since 1995. Sandra has held a range of non-executive posts in organisations including Rand Europe (UK), JP Morgan Fleming Claverhouse Investment Trust and Riverside Mental Health Trust. She was also a member

Term of office Sandra joined the Senior Salaries Review Board. She is a memberBoard in March 2003. Sandra will retire from the Board at the 2009 AGM in April.

Independent Yes

External appointments KPMG Professor of Management Studies, University of Cambridge since 1995. Master of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge since 1999. Director and Trustee of Oxfam since 2006. Deputy Vice Chancellor, University of Cambridge since 2008. Chairman, Executive Steering Committee, ESRC Advanced Institute of Management. Director of Cambridge Econometrics until 2007. Director of Judge Business School, University of Cambridge until 2006. Director of Rand Europe (UK) until 2004. Director of JP Morgan Fleming Claverhouse Investment Trust until 2003.

Committee membership Member of the Board Audit Committee.Committee since August 2003.

8.Sir7. Sir Andrew Likierman

Non-executive Director (Age 64)(Age 65)

Sir Andrew joinedis Chairman of the Board on 1st September 2004. He was previouslyNational Audit Office, having held a number of public roles in the financial services sector, including Managing Director, Financial Management, Reporting and Audit and Head of the Government Accountancy Service at HM Treasury. He is Professor of Management Practice in Accounting at the London Business SchoolTreasury and a non-executive Director of the Bank of England. Sir Andrew is also Dean of the London Business School where he was formerly a non-executive Directorpreviously Professor of Management Practice in Accounting. He has been at the London Business School from 1974-1976, 1979-1993 and since 2004.

Term of office Sir Andrew joined the Board in September 2004. Sir Andrew was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007.

Independent Yes

External appointments Dean of the London Business School since January 2009. Chairman of MORI Group Limited. He is also a non-executivethe National Audit Office since December 2008. Director of the Institute for Government since September 2008. Chairman of Applied Intellectual Capital Inc. until 2008. Non-executive Director of the Bank of England until 2008. Non-executive Director and Vice-Chairman of the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust until 2008. Non-executive Director and non-executive Chairman of Applied Intellectual Capital PLC. Sir Andrew is a memberthe MORI Group until 2005. Managing Director, Financial Management, Reporting and Audit and Head of the Government Accountancy Service at HM Treasury until 2004.

Committee membership Member of the Board Audit andCommittee since September 2004. Member of the Board Risk Committees.Committee since September 2004.

9.Sir8. Sir Michael Rake

Non-executive Director (Age 60)(Age 61)

Sir Michael was appointed to the Board with effect from 1st January 2008. He also became a member of the Board Audit Committee. Sir Michael is a former Chairman of KPMG International and is currently Chairman of BT Group plcPLC and Chairman of the UK Commission for Employment and Skills. Sir Michael previously worked at KPMG from 1974-2007 where he worked for a number of years in Continental Europe and the Middle East. He is also awas Senior Partner of the UK firm from 1998-2000 and Chairman of KPMG International from 2002-2007.

Term of office Sir Michael joined the Board in January 2008. Sir Michael was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2008, following his appointment.

IndependentYes

External appointments Chairman of BT Group PLC since 2007. Director of The McGraw-Hill Companies and the Financial Reporting Council. Sir Michael wasCouncil since 2007. Chairman of the UK Commission for Employment and Skills since 2007. Director of the McGraw-Hill Companies since 2007. Chairman of KPMG International until 2007. Chairman of Business in the Community from 2004 tountil 2007.


 

LOGO

LOGO

 

112138 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

 

10.SirCommittee membership Member of the Board Audit Committee since January 2008. He will succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Board Audit Committee in March 2009.

9. Sir Nigel Rudd, DL

Deputy Chairman

Non-executive Director(Age 61) (Age 62)

Sir Nigel joined the Board in February 1996 and was appointed Deputy Chairman on 1st September 2004. He is non-executive Chairman of Pendragon PLC and BAA Limited. He is also Deputy Chairman of Invensys plc and a non-executive Director of BAE Systems PLC and Sappi Limited. He was formerly Chairman of Alliance Boots PLC.

Term of office Sir Nigel joined the Board in February 1996 and was appointed Deputy Chairman in September 2004. Sir Nigel will retire from the Board at the 2009 AGM in April.

Independent Yes

External appointments Chairman of Pendragon PLC a position he heldsince 1989. Non-executve Director and Deputy Chairman of Invensys plc since January 2009. Chairman of Alliance Boots PLC until June 2007. He is a memberDirector of Pilkington PLC until 2006. Director of Kidde PLC until 2003.

Committee membership Member of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and also chairssince October 2001. Chairman of the Group’sBarclays Brand and Reputation Committee.

11.Stephen10. Stephen Russell

Non-executive Director(Age 62) (Age 63)

Stephen joined the Board in October 2000 on completion of the acquisition of Woolwich PLC. He was Chief Executive of Boots Group PLC from 2000 until 2003, having worked for Boots since 1967. StephenHe has held a number of non-executive positions and is currently a non-executive Director of Network Rail and Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. He is a trustee of St. John’s Ambulance and Tommy’s the Baby Charity, and is on the Council of Nottingham University. HeUniversity and is Chairman of Business Control Solutions Group.

Term of office Stephen joined the Board in October 2000 on completion of the acquisition of Woolwich PLC. Stephen was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007.

Independent Yes

External appointments Non-executive Director of Network Rail as a non-executive Director insince September 2007 and became2007. Trustee of St John’s Ambulance since 2005. Chairman of Business Control Solutions Group in October 2007. Stephen issince 2005. Trustee of Tommy’s the Baby Charity since 2003. Member of the Council of Nottingham University since 2003. Chief Executive of Boots Group PLC until 2003.

Committee membership Chairman of the Board Audit Committee and is a membersince April 2003 (member since October 2000). He will be succeeded by Sir Michael Rake as Chairman of the Board Risk andAudit Committee in March 2009. Member of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committees.Committee since September 2004. Member of the Board Risk Committee since October 2001 (Chairman from September 2004-December 2005).

12.Sir11. Sir John Sunderland

Non-executive Director(Age 62) (Age 63)

Sir John joined the Board on 1st June 2005. He has beenwas Chairman of Cadbury Schweppes PLC since May 2003. Sir John joined Cadbury Schweppesuntil July 2008 having worked at Cadbury’s in 1968 and was appointedvarious roles, including that of Chief Executive, in September 1996.since 1968. He is Deputy President of the Chartered Management Institute, and Deputy President of the CBI, having retired as President on 31st December 2006. He is a former President of both ISBA (the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers) and the Food and Drink Federation. Sir John is a Director of the Financial Reporting Council, an Adviser to CVC Capital Partners, an Association Member of BUPA and a Governor of both Reading and Aston University Councils.

Term of office Sir John joined the Board in June 2005. Sir John was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2008.

Independent Yes

External appointments Deputy President of the Chartered Management Institute since 2008 (President 2007-2008). Director of the Financial Reporting Council since 2004. Adviser to CVC Capital Partners. Association Member of BUPA. Governor, Aston University Council. Governor, Reading University Council. Chairman of Cadbury Schweppes PLC until July 2008. Deputy President of the CBI to June 2008 (member since 2003 and President until December 2006). President of ISBA (the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers) until 2005. President of the Food and Drink Federation until 2005. Non-executive Director of the Rank Group PLC until 2006. Former Advisory Board Member of Trinsum Group and an AssociationGroup.

Committee membership Member of BUPA. He is a memberthe Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee since September 2006. Member of the Board HR and Remuneration and Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committees.Committee since July 2005.

13.Patience12. Patience Wheatcroft

Non-executive Director(Age 56) (Age 57)

Patience was appointed to the Board on 1st January 2008. Anan established financial journalist and national newspaper editor, Patience is a formerhaving worked as Editor ofThe the Sunday Telegraph from 2006 to 2007 and was Business and City Editor ofThe Timesbetween 1997 and 2006. from 1997-2006. She is a non-executive Director of Shaftesbury PLC, a member of the UK/India Round Table and a member of the British Olympic Association Advisory Board. She is also a member of the Council of the Royal Albert Hall and Chair of the Forensic Audit Panel.

Term of office Patience joined the Board in January 2008. Patience was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2008 following her appointment.

14.JohnIndependent Yes

External appointments Non-executive Director of Shaftesbury PLC since 2008. Member of the UK/India Round Table. Member of the British Olympic Association Advisory Board since 2007. Member of the Council of the Royal Albert Hall. Chair of the Forensic Audit Panel since 2008. Editor of the Sunday Telegraph until 2007. Business and City Editor of The Times until 2006.

Committee membership Member of the Barclays Brand and Reputation Committee.

13. John Varley

Group Chief Executive

Executive Director and Chairman of Executive Committee(Age 51) (Age 52)

John was appointed as Group Chief Executive of Barclays on 1st September 2004, prior to which he had been Group Deputy Chief Executive from 1st January 2004. He joined Barclays in 1982 and has held various positions across the Group, including the position of Group Finance Director from 2000 until the end of 2003. John joined the Executive Committee in September 1996 and was appointed to the Board in June 1998. He was Chief Executive of Retail Financial Services from 1998 to 2000 and Chairman of the Asset Management Division from 1995 to 1998. John is a non-executive Director of AstraZeneca PLC. He is also Chairman of Business Action on Homelessness, President of the Employer’s Forum on Disability, Honorary President of the UK Drug Policy Commission and a member of the International Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Term of office John is also a non-executivejoined the Executive Committee in September 1996 and was appointed to the Board in June 1998. John was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007.

External appointments Non-executive Director of AstraZeneca PLC.PLC since 2006. Non-executive Director of British Grolux Investments Limited since 1999. Chairman of Business Action on Homelessness since 2006. President of the Employer’s Forum on Disability since 2005. Honorary President of the UK Drug Policy Commission since 2007. Member of the International Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore since 2006.

15.Robert14. Robert E Diamond Jr

President, Barclays PLC and CEO, Investment Banking and Investment Management

Executive Director and member of Executive Committee(Age 56) (Age 57)

Bob was appointed President of Barclays and became an executive Director on 1st June 2005. He is responsible for the Investment Banking and Investment Management business of the Barclays Group.Group, comprising of Barclays Capital, Barclays Global Investors and Barclays Wealth. He has been a member of the Executive Committee since September 1997. He joined Barclays in July 1996 from CSFB,previously worked for Morgan Stanley and CS First Boston, where he was Vice-Chairman and Head of Global Fixed Income and Foreign Exchange.

Term of office Bob iswas appointed President of Barclays PLC and became an executive Director in June 2005. He has been a member of the Barclays Executive Committee since September 1997. Bob was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2006, following his appointment.

External appointments Chairman of Old Vic Productions PLC.PLC since September 2007.

16.Gary Hoffman

Group Vice-Chairman

Executive Director(Age 47)

Gary was appointed as Group Vice-Chairman in July 2006. He was formerly Chairman of UK Banking and of Barclaycard and prior to that was Chief Executive of Barclaycard. He joined the Board on 1st January 2004. As Group Vice-Chairman, Gary is accountable on the Board for a range of responsibilities including Corporate Sustainability, Public Policy, Equality and Diversity, leading the Group’s response to the FSA’s Treating Customers Fairly initiative, chairing the Group’s Governance and Control Committee and franchise health with customers, employees and communities. Gary joined the Group in 1982. Gary is also a non-executive Director of Trinity Mirror PLC.

17.Christopher15. Christopher Lucas

Group Finance Director

Executive Director and member of Executive Committee(Age 47) (Age 48)

Chris has worked across financial services for most of his career, including three years in New York as Head of the US Banking Audit Practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Chris joined the Board on 1st April 2007. Chris cameBarclays from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was UK Head of Financial Services and Global Head of Banking and Capital Markets. He was Global Relationship Partner for Barclays for the 1999-20041999–2004 financial years and subsequently held similar roles for other global financial services organisations.

Term of office Chris has worked across financial services for mostwas appointed Group Finance Director and became a member of the Executive Committee in April 2007. Chris was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007, following his career, including three years in New York asappointment.

External appointments UK Head of the USFinancial Services and Global Head of Banking Audit Practiceand Capital Markets of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.LLP until 2006.

18.Frederik16. Frederik (Frits) Seegers

Chief Executive, Global Retail and Commercial Banking

Executive Director and member of Executive Committee(Age 49) (Age 50)

Frits was appointed as Chief Executive ofis responsible for the Global Retail and Commercial Banking and became an executive Director on 10th July 2006. He is responsible for allbusiness of the Barclays retail and commercial banking operations globally, includingGroup, which includes UK Retail Banking, Barclays Commercial Bank, International RetailBarclaycard, GRCB – Western Europe, GRCB – Emerging Markets and Commercial Banking and Barclaycard. He is also a non-executive Director of Absa Group Limited.GRCB – Absa. Frits joined the BoardBarclays from Citigroup where he previously held a number of senior positions latterlyover the 17 years he worked there. Most recently, he was CEO Global Consumer Group with a remit covering all retail operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. He was also a member of the Citigroup Operating Committee and the Citigroup Management Committee.

He was CEO of Consumer Banking for Asia Pacific, covering 11 consumer markets, between 2001 and 2004. Under his leadership, this region was the fastest growing part of Citigroup. Frits was a non-executive Director of Absa Group Limited from 2006 until February 2009.

19.Paul Idzik

Chief Operating Officer

MemberTerm of Executive Committee(Age 47)office

Paul Frits joined the Board and the Executive Committee and becamein July 2006. Frits was last re-elected by shareholders at the AGM in 2007, following his appointment.

External appointments Chief Operating Officer in November 2004. He is also Chairman of the Group Operating Committee. Paul was formerly Chief OperatingExecutive Officer of Barclays Capital. He joined Barclays Capital in August 1999 following a career with Booz Allen & Hamilton, where he was a partner and senior member of the Financial Institutions Practice.Citigroup International PLC until 2006.


 

LOGO

LOGO

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 113
 139


Directors’ report

 

Directors’ report

Profit Attributable

The profit attributable to equity shareholders of Barclays PLC for the year amounted to £4,417m,£4,382m, compared with £4,571m£4,417m in 2006.2007.

Dividends

As announced on 13th October 2008, in the light of the new capital ratios agreed with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and in recognition of the need to maximise capital resources in the current economic climate, the Board concluded that it would not be appropriate to pay a final dividend for 2008. The finalBoard intends to resume dividend payments in the second half of 2009, at which time it is intended to pay dividends quarterly. The interim dividend for the year ended 31st December 2007 of 22.5p per ordinary share of 25p each and 10p per staff share of £1 each have been agreed by the Directors. The final dividends will be paid on 25th April 2008 in respect of the ordinary shares registered at the close of business on 7th March 2008 and in respect of the staff shares so registered on 31st December 2007. With the interim dividends of 11.5p per ordinary share and of 10p per staff share that werewas paid on 1st October 2007,2008 and the total distribution for 20072008 is 11.5p (2007: 34.0p (2006: 31.0p) per ordinary share and 20p (2006: 20p) pershare). The staff share.shares were re-purchased by the Company during the year. The dividends for the year absorbhave absorbed a total of £2,253m (2006: £1,973m)£915m (2007: £2,253m).

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Ordinary shareholders may have their dividends reinvested in Barclays PLC ordinary shares by participating in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The plan is available to all ordinary shareholders provided that they do not live in, and are not subject to the jurisdiction of, any country where their participation in the plan would require Barclays or The Plan Administrator to take action to comply with local government or regulatory procedures or any similar formalities. Any shareholder wishing to obtain details of the plan and a mandate form should contact The Plan Administrator to Barclays at Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing BN99 6DA. Those wishing to participate for the first time in the plan should send their completed mandate form to The Plan Administrator so as to be received by 4th April 2008 for it to be applicable to the payment of the final dividend on 25th April 2008. Existing participants should take no action unless they wish to alter their current mandate instructions, in which case they should contact The Plan Administrator.

Share Capital

DuringAt the year Barclays PLC purchased2008 Annual General Meeting, shareholders approved the creation of Sterling, Dollar, Euro and Yen preference shares (‘preference shares’) in order to provide the marketGroup with more flexibility in managing its capital resources. As at 27th February 2009 (the latest practicable date for cancellation 299,547,510 of its ordinaryinclusion in this report) no preference shares of 25p each, at a total cost of £1,802,173,355, inhave been issued.

In order to minimise the dilutive effect on existing shareholders of the issuance of 336,805,556 ordinary shares in 2007, at the start of 2008 the Company purchased in the market for cancellation 36,150,000 of its ordinary shares of 25p each, at a total cost of 336,805,556 Barclays ordinary£171,923,243 (this was in addition to the 299,547,510 shares to Temasek Holdings and China Development Bank. These transactions represent 4.5%purchased for cancellation in 2007). During 2008 the Company purchased all of its staff shares in issue, following approval for such purchase being given at the issued share capital2008 Annual General Meeting, at 31st December 2007.a total cost of £1,023,054. As at 27th February 2008 (the latest practicable date for inclusion in this report),2009, the Company had an unexpired authority to repurchase shares up to a maximum of 645.1 million984,960,000 ordinary shares.

The issued ordinary share capital was increased by 65.5m1,772m ordinary shares during the year2008. In addition to those issued as a result of the exercise of options under the Sharesave and Executive Share Option Schemes. Schemes during the year, the following share issues took place:

On 4th July 2008, the Company issued 168.9 million new ordinary shares in a firm placing to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation.

On 22nd July 2008, the Company issued 1,407.4 million new ordinary shares following a placing to Qatar Holding LLC, Challenger Universal Limited (a company representing the beneficial interests of His Excellency Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jabr Al-Thani, the chairman of Qatar Holding LLC, and his family), China Development Bank, Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited and certain leading institutional shareholders and other investors, which shares were available for clawback in full by means of an open offer to existing shareholders. Valid applications under the open offer were received from qualifying shareholders in respect of approximately 267 million new ordinary shares in aggregate, representing 19.0% of the shares offered pursuant to the open offer. Accordingly, the remaining 1,140.3 million shares were allocated to the various investors with whom they had been conditionally placed.

On 18th September 2008, the Company issued 226 million new ordinary shares to certain institutional investors.

During the period 27th November 2008 to 31st December 2008, 33,000 ordinary shares were issued following conversion of Mandatorily Convertible Notes at the option of their holders.

At 31st December 20072008 the issued ordinary share capital totalled 6,600,181,8018,371,830,617 shares. Ordinary shares represent 99.99%100% of the total issued share capital and Staff shares represent the remaining 0.01% as at 31st December 2007.2008.

The Barclays PLCCompany’s Memorandum and Articles of Association, a summary of which can be found in the Shareholder Information section on pages 269-270,305-309, contain the following details, which are incorporated into this report by reference:

 

 

The structure of the Company’s capital, including the rights and obligations attaching to each class of shares.

 

 

Restrictions on the transfer of securities in the Company, including limitations on the holding of securities and requirements to obtain approvals for a transfer of securities.

 

 

Restrictions on voting rights.

 

 

The powers of the Directors, including in relation to issuing or buying back shares in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. It will be proposed at the 20082009 AGM that the Directors be granted new authorityauthorities to allot and buy back shares under the Companies Act 1985.

 

 

Rules that the Company has about the appointment and removal of Directors or amendments to the Company’s Articles of Association.

Employee Benefit Trusts (‘EBTs’) operate in connection with certain of the Group’s Employee Share Plans (‘Plans’). The Trustees of the EBTs may exercise all rights attached to the shares in accordance with their fiduciary duties other than as specifically restricted in the relevant Plan governing documents. Further informationThe trustees of the EBTs have informed the Bank that their normal policy is to abstain from voting in respect of the Barclays shares held in trust. The trustees of the Sharepurchase EBT may vote in respect of Barclays shares held in the Sharepurchase EBT, but only at the discretion of the participants. The trustees will not otherwise vote in respect of shares held in the Sharepurchase EBT.

Mandatorily Convertible Notes

On 27th November 2008, Barclays Bank PLC issued £4,050m of 9.75% Mandatorily Convertible Notes (MCNs) maturing on 30th September 2009 to Qatar Holding LLC, Challenger Universal Limited and entities representing the beneficial interests of HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of the Royal Family of Abu Dhabi and existing institutional shareholders and other institutional investors. If not converted at the holders’ option beforehand, these instruments mandatorily convert to ordinary shares of Barclays PLC on 30th June 2009. The conversion price is £1.53276 and, after taking into account MCNs that were converted on or before 31st December 2008, will result in the issue of 2,642 million new ordinary shares.

If there is a change of control of Barclays PLC following a takeover bid, Barclays PLC must (so far as legally possible) use all reasonable endeavours to cause the corporation which then controls Barclays PLC to execute a deed poll providing that the holders of the MCNs shall have the right (during the period ending on 30th June 2009) to convert the MCNs into, and to receive on a mandatory conversion, as the case may be, the class and amount of shares and other securities and property receivable upon such a takeover by the holders of the number of ordinary shares as would have been issued on conversion of the MCNs had such MCNs been converted immediately prior to the completion of such takeover.

The issue of new ordinary shares or certain other securities and rights of the Company, at any time during the period commencing on 27th November 2008 and ending on the EBTs’ voting policy candate on which a holder exercises its optional conversion right or on the mandatory conversion date, at a price (the ‘Future Placing Price’) lower than the then current conversion price will (subject to exceptions for ordinary shares issued pursuant to employee share schemes, under the warrants or as a result of certain corporate events) result in a downward adjustment to the conversion price (subject to a minimum conversion price of the then par value per ordinary share (currently 25 pence)) so that it equals the Future Placing Price. The conversion price will also be foundsubject to adjustment if the Company distributes an extraordinary dividend or if certain dilutive events occur, including bonus issues, rights issues or an adjustment to the nominal value or redenomination of the ordinary shares.


140

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Warrants

On 31st October 2008 Barclays PLC issued, in conjunction with a simultaneous issue of Reserve Capital Instruments issued by Barclays Bank PLC, warrants to subscribe for up to 1,516.9 million new ordinary shares at a price of £1.97775 to Qatar Holding LLC and HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The warrants may be exercised at any time up to close of business on page 132.31st October 2013.

If there is a change of control of Barclays PLC following a takeover bid, Barclays PLC must (so far as legally possible) use all reasonable endeavours to cause the corporation which then controls Barclays PLC to execute a deed poll providing that the holders of the warrants shall have the right (during the period in which the warrants are exercisable) to exercise the warrants into the class and amount of shares and other securities and property receivable upon such a takeover by the holders of the number of ordinary shares as would have been issued on exercise of the warrants had such warrants been exercised immediately prior to the completion of such takeover.

The warrants contain provisions for the adjustment of the gross number of ordinary shares in the event of the occurence of certain dilutive events including, amongst others, extraordinary dividends, bonus issues, alterations to the nominal value of ordinary shares and rights issues.

Conversion of the outstanding MCNs and exercise of the Warrants in full would result in the issue of a further 4,159,167,571 new ordinary shares. The resultant shareholdings of Qatar Holding LLC and HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, if the MCNs and Warrants they each hold were converted or exercised in full and taking into account existing holdings of Barclays shares, would represent approximately 12.8% and 16.5%, respectively, of the enlarged Barclays PLC issued ordinary share capital.

Substantial Shareholdings

Substantial shareholders do not have different voting rights from those of other shareholders. As at 27th February 2008,2009, the Company had been notified under Rule 5 of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the FSA of the following holdings of voting rights in its shares:

China Development Bank

(via its subsidiary Upper Chance Group Ltd)

3.02%

Legal & General Group plc

4.02%

Lloyds TSB Group Plc

5.01%

Substantial shareholders do not have different voting rights from thoseNo. of other shareholders. As at 27th February 2008, the Company had been notified that Lloyds TSB Group Plc held voting rights over 329,648,746 of its ordinary shares        amounting to 5.01% of the Company’s total voting rights, as shown above.

Qatar Holding LLC

  522,755,622          6.4%

Axa S.A.

  460,195,183          5.5%

Legal & General Group plc

  330,460,896          4.1%

Board Membership

The membership of the Boards of Directors of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC is identical and biographical details of the Board members are set out on pages 112138 and 113.139.

Chris Lucas joined the Board as Group Finance Director on 1st April 2007 and Naguib Kheraj left the Board on 31st March 2007.

David Booth joined the Board as a non-executive Director on 1st May 2007 and Patience Wheatcroft and Sir Michael Rake were appointed as non-executive Directors with effect from 1st January 2008. Simon Fraser will join the Board as a non-executive Director with effect from 10th March 2009, subject to regulatory approvals. Dr Danie Cronjé left the Board on 24th April 2008 and Gary Hoffman left the Board on 31st August 2008.

Retirement and Re-election of Directors

In accordance with its Articles of Association, one-third (rounded down) ofAs announced on 18th November 2008, at the 2009 AGM all Directors of Barclays PLC are required to retire by rotation at each Annual General Meeting (AGM), together with Directors appointed by the Board since the last AGM. The retiring Directors are eligible towill stand for re-election. In addition,re-election, with the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance (the Code), recommends that every Director should seek re-election by shareholders at least every three years.


114

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


The Directors retiring by rotation at the 2008 AGM and offering themselves for re-election are Fulvio Conti, Gary Hoffman and Sir John Sunderland.exception of Sir Nigel Rudd retires annually as recommended by the Code and is offering himself for re-election. In addition, David Booth, Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft,Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, who were appointed as Directors since the last AGM, will be offering themselves for re-electionretire at the 2008 AGM. Danie Cronjé is retiring atconclusion of the 2009 AGM and isare not offering himselfthemselves for re-election.

Directors’ Interests

Directors’ interests in the shares of the Group on 31st December 20072008 are shown on page 142.pages 164 and 166.

Directors’ Emoluments

Information on emoluments of Directors of Barclays PLC, in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and the Listing Rules of the United Kingdom Listing Authority, is given in the Remuneration reportReport on pages 128157 to 142172 and in Note 4243 to the accounts.

Directors’ Indemnities

The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Group to attract and retain the services of the most able and experienced Directors by offering competitive terms of engagement, including the granting of indemnities on terms consistent with the applicable statutory provisions. Qualifying third party indemnity provisions (as defined by section 234 of the Companies Act 2006) were accordingly in force during the course of the financial year ended 31st December 20072008 for the benefit of the then Directors and, at the date of this report, are in force for the benefit of the Directors in relation to certain losses and liabilities which they may incur (or have incurred) in connection with their duties, powers or office.

Activities

Barclays PLC Group is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail and commercial banking, credit cards, investment banking, wealth management and investment management services. The Group operates through branches, offices and subsidiaries in the UK and overseas.

Community Involvement and Charitable Donations

Barclays has an extensive community programme covering many countries around the world. The Group provides funding and support to over 7,1407,000 charities and voluntary organisations, ranging from small, local charities, like Passage (UK), to international organisations like the Red Cross. We also have a very successful employee programme which in 20072008 saw more than 43,70057,000 employees and pensioners worldwide taking part in Barclays-supported volunteering, giving and fundraising activities. Further information on our community involvement is given on pages 5853 and 60.54.

The total commitment for 20072008 was £52.4m (2006: £46.5m)£52.2m (2007: £52.4m). The Group committed £38.9m£27.7m in support of the community in the UK (2006: £39.6m)(2007: £38.9m) and £13.5m£24.5m was committed in international support (2006: £6.9m)(2007: £13.5m). The UK commitment includes £30.4m£19.6m of charitable donations (2006: £35.2m)(2007: £30.4m).

Political Donations

The Group did not give any money for political purposes in the UK nor did it make any donations to EU political organisations or incur any EU political expenditure during the year.

Absa Group Limited, in which the Group acquired a majority stake in 2005, made donations totalling £170,142£186,589 in 2007 (2006: £212,729)2008 (2007: £170,142) in accordance with its policy of making political donations to the major South African political parties as part of their Democracy Support Programme. Donations are made to supportparties with more than three seats in the developmentNational Parliament as confirmed by the Independent Electoral Commission. Support for the deepening of democracy in South Africa.Africa remains paramount for the new government. The Group made no other political donations in 2007.2008.

At the AGM in 2007,2008, shareholders gave a limited authority for Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries to make political donations and incur political expenditure, within an agreed limit, as a precautionary measure in light of the wide definitions in The Political Parties, Elections and Referendumsthe Companies Act 2000.2006. This was similar to an authority given by shareholders in 2006.2007. This authority, which has not been used, expires at the conclusion of the AGM held this year, or, if earlier, 26th July 2008. 30th June 2009.

The Companies Act 2006 largely restates the provisions of The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The risk of inadvertently breaching the Companies Act 2006 remains, and the Directors consider it prudent to seek a similar authority from shareholders. A resolution to authorise Barclays PLC and its subsidiaries

to make EU political donations and incur EU political expenditure up to a maximum aggregate sum of £125,000 is therefore being proposed at the Barclays PLC 20082009 AGM.

Employee Involvement

Barclays is committed to ensuring that employees share in the success of the Group. StaffColleagues are encouraged to participate in share option and share purchase schemes and have a substantial sum invested in Barclays shares.

Employees are kept informed of matters of concern to them in a variety of ways, including the corporate news magazines, intranets, briefings and mobile phone SMS messaging. These communications help achieve a common awareness among employees of the financial and economic factors affecting the performance of Barclays.

Barclays is also committed to providing employees with opportunities to share their views and provide feedback on issues that are important to them. An annual Employee Opinion Survey is undertaken across Global Retail and Commercial Banking and Group Centre with results being reported to the Board and the Board HR and Remuneration Committee, all employees and to our European Works Council, Africa Forum, Unite (Amicus section), our recognised union in the UK.UK and other recognised unions worldwide. Roadshows and employee forums also take place.

In addition, Barclays undertakes regular and formal Group, business unit and project specific consultations with Unite (Amicus section).our recognised trade unions and works councils internationally.

Diversity and Inclusion

The diversity agenda at Barclays seeks to include customers, colleagues and suppliers. Our objective is to recruit and retain the best people, regardless of (but not limited to) race, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation or disability. We strive to ensure our workforce reflects the communities in which we operate and the international nature of the organisation. We recognise that diversity is a key part of responsible business strategy in support of our increasingly global business.

Barclays is committed to providing additional support to employees with disabilities and making it easier for them to inform us of their specific


BarclaysAnnual Report 2008141


Directors’ report

requirements, including the introduction of a dedicated intranet site and disability helpline. Through our Reasonable Adjustments Scheme, appropriate assistance can be given, including both physical workplace adjustments, and relevant training and access to trained mentors is also provided for disabled employees. A wide range of recruitment initiatives have been taken to increase the number of people with disabilities working in Barclays.

Health and Safety

Barclays is committed to ensuring the health, safety and welfare of our employees and to providing and maintaining safe working conditions. Barclays regards legislative compliance as a minimum and, where appropriate, we seek to implement higher standards. Barclays also recognises its responsibilities towards all persons on its premises, such as contractors, visitors and members of the public, and ensures, so far as is reasonably practicable, that they are not exposed to significant risks to their health and safety.

Barclays regularly reviews its Statement of Health and Safety Commitment, issued with the authority of the Board and which applies to all business areas in which Barclays has operational control. In this statement Barclays commits to:

 

· 

demonstrate personal leadership that is consistent with this commitment;

 

· 

provide the appropriate resources to fulfil this commitment;

 

· 

carry out risk assessments and take appropriate actions to mitigate the risks identified;

 

· 

consult with our employees on matters affecting their health and safety;

 

· 

ensure that appropriate information, instruction, training and supervision are provided;

 

· 

appoint competent persons to provide specialist advice; and

 

· 

review Barclays Health and Safety Group Process and the Statement of Commitment, at regular intervals.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

115


Directors’ report

Barclays monitors its health and safety performance using a variety of measurements on a monthly basis and the Board HR and Remuneration Committee receives annual reports on health and safety performance from the Human ResourceResources Director. As part of its Partnership Agreement with Unite (Amicus section), Barclays currently funds full time Health and Safety Representatives.

Creditors’ Payment Policy

Barclays values its suppliers and acknowledges the importance of paying invoices, especially those of small businesses, in a timely manner. It is the Group’s practice to agree terms with suppliers when entering into contracts. We negotiate with suppliers on an individual basis and meet our obligations accordingly. The Group does not follow any specific published code or standard on payment practice.

Paragraph 12(3) of Schedule 7 of the Companies Act 1985 requires disclosure of trade creditor payment days. Disclosure is required by the Company, rather than the Group. The Group’s principal trading subsidiary in the UK is Barclays Bank PLC, the accounts for which are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. The components for the trade creditor calculation are not easily identified. However, by identifying as closely as possible the components that would be required if Schedule 4 of the Companies Act 1985 applied, the trade creditor payment days for Barclays Bank PLC for 20072008 were 2724 days (2006: 28(2007: 27 days). This is an arithmetical calculation and does not necessarily reflect our practice, which is described above, nor the experience of any individual creditor.

Essential business contracts

There are no persons with whom the Group has contractual or other arrangements that are considered essential to the business of the Group.

Research and Development

In the ordinary course of business, Barclays develops new products and services in each of its business units.

Financial Instruments

The Group’s financial risk management objectives and policies, including the policy for hedging each major type of forecasted transaction for which hedge accounting is used, and the exposure to market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk are set out in pages 6167 to 92113 under the headings, ‘Barclays approach to risk management’, ‘Credit Risk Management’, ‘Market risk management’, ‘Liquidity Risk Management’ and ‘Derivatives’ and in Note 14 and Notes 4546 to 4849 to the accounts.

Events after the Balance Sheet Date

On 3rd March2nd February 2009, Barclays completed the acquisition of PT Bank Akita, which was announced initially on 17th September 2008, Barclays entered into an agreement with Petropavlovsk Finance (Limited Liability Society) to acquire 100% following the approval

of the Russian bank, Expobank, for a considerationCentral Bank of approximately $745m (£373m). The transaction is expectedIndonesia. On 17th February 2009, Barclays announced that Barclays Capital will discontinue operations at its EquiFirst subsidiary due to close in summer 2008 after the receiptmarket environment and strategic direction of appropriate regulatory approvals. Expobank focuses principally on Western Russia, with a substantial presence in Moscow and St Petersburg. Founded in 1994, it has grown rapidly and comprises a blend of retail and commercial banking, operating 32 branches and dealing with a range of corporate and wholesale clients. As at 31st December 2007, Expobank had net assets of $186m (£93m).the Group.

The Auditors

The Board Audit Committee reviews the appointment of the external auditors, as well as their relationship with the Group, including monitoring the Group’s use of the auditors for non-audit services and the balance of audit and non-audit fees paid to the auditors. More details on this can be found on pages 122198 and 123199 and Note 9 to the accounts. Having reviewed the independence and effectiveness of the external auditors, the Committee has recommended to the Board that the existing auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, be reappointed. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have signified their willingness to continue in office and ordinary resolutions reappointing them as auditors and authorising the Directors to set their remuneration will be proposed at the 20082009 AGM.

So far as each of the Directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditors are unaware. Each of the Directors has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a Director in order to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information. For these purposes, ‘relevant audit information’ means information needed by the Company’s auditors in connection with preparing their report.

The Annual General Meeting and

Class Meeting of Ordinary Shareholders

The Barclays PLC AGM will be held at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre on Thursday 24th23rd April 2008.2009. The Notice of AGM is included in a separate document sent to shareholders with this report. A summary of the resolutions being proposed at the 20082009 AGM is set out below:

Ordinary Resolutions

 

 

To receive the Directors’ and Auditors’ Reports and the audited accounts for the year ended 31st December 2007.2008.

 

 

To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31st December 2007.2008.

 

 

To re-elect the following Directors:

 

 David Booth;

Simon Fraser

 

 Sir Michael Rake;

Marcus Agius

 

 Patience Wheatcroft;

David Booth

Sir Richard Broadbent

 

 Fulvio Conti;

Richard Leigh Clifford

 

 Gary Hoffman;

Fulvio Conti

 

 Sir John Sunderland; and

Robert E Diamond Jr

 

 

Sir Nigel Rudd.Andrew Likierman

Christopher Lucas

Sir Michael Rake

Stephen Russell

Frederik Seegers

Sir John Sunderland

John Varley

Patience Wheatcroft

 

 

To reappoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors of the Company.

 

 

To authorise the Directors to set the remuneration of the Auditors.auditors.

 

 

To authorise Barclays PLC and its subsidiaries to make EU political donations and incur EU political expenditure.

To authorise an increase in the Company’s authorised share capital.

 

 

To renew the authority given to the Directors to allot securities.

Special Resolutions

 

 

To renew the authority given to the Directors to allot equity securities for cash other than on a pro-rata basis to shareholders and to sell treasury shares.

 

 

To renew the Company’s authority to purchase its own shares.

 

 

To authorise the purchase of staff shares.permit General Meetings to continue to be called on 14 clear days’ notice.

To create preference shares.

To adopt new Articles of Association.

A Class Meeting of ordinary shareholders will be held at the conclusion of the AGM to consider an extraordinary resolution approving the creation of preference shares.

This is only a summary of the business to be transacted at the meetingsmeeting and you should refer to the Notice of Shareholder MeetingsAGM for full details.

By order of the Board

 

LOGO

By order of the Board
LOGO
Lawrence Dickinson
Company Secretary
7th5th March 20082009

 

116142 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

 

Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Corporate governance report

Group Chairman’s Introduction

I am pleased to report to you on the activities of the Board and its Committees over the past 12 months, my first year as Group Chairman. It has been an eventful and busy year but we have continued to apply the high standards of corporate governance that we set both for ourselves as a Board and for our Company.

Since I last reported to you, there have been a number of changes to the Board. Chris Lucas succeeded Naguib Kheraj as Group Finance Director in April 2007 and we have significantly strengthened the independent non-executive presence on the Board with the appointments of David Booth, Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft.

Weduring 2008. Our report below onsets out how we have complied in 2007 with the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance (the Code). We are committed to promoting good corporate governance. We seek and also gives further details of the matters that the Board and its principal Committees have considered over the year.

The year proved to be extremely challenging for the financial services industry as increasing vulnerabilities exposed in the global financial system created a period of exceptional instability.

During October 2008, it became clear that an industry-wide solution to the risks of systemic failure in the UK financial services sector was needed. The outcome of discussions between the UK’s FSA and all UK banks was that we, along with many of our competitors, were required to raise additional equity and Tier 1 capital to take our capital ratios well beyond the levels we had previously agreed with our regulators (the ‘Capital Raising’).

On 31st October 2008, Barclays announced the Capital Raising. In the extraordinary circumstances leading up to that announcement, the Board had choices to make – choices not available to all banks. These choices entailed exceptionally difficult judgements made in market circumstances where from one day to the next nothing could be taken for granted.

These choices included retaining independent control of the business in undertaking the recapitalisation required by the authorities; recapitalising the business in one market operation well in advance of the June 2009 deadline set by the authorities; and effecting a recapitalisation under which all shareholders were not afforded their pre-emption rights.

The Board did not take any of these decisions lightly: its governance processes were rigorous. It met frequently, debated the issues at length, heard differing views and arguments, sought external advice and consulted representative shareholder bodies. The decisions it made were reached in the interests of shareholders as the Board, in the circumstances at the forefronttime, perceived them to be. These included forming judgements about the earnings per share and return on capital consequences of global best practicethe Capital Raising for existing shareholders.

The Board believes that the decisions made have resulted in the Group being able to maintain its strategic momentum. The Directors deeply regret, however, that the Capital Raising denied Barclays then existing shareholders their full rights of pre-emption with respect to the ordinary shares issued. The Directors recognise that there is a high level of unhappiness on the part of some shareholders that the principle of pre-emption was breached, with consequent dilution of shareholdings and that, were it not to avoid the risk of destabilising the Company or the system, more of them may have voted against the enabling resolution at the General Meeting on 24th November 2008.

The Directors wish to place on record both their appreciation of the support received from shareholders in difficult circumstances in completing the Capital Raising and to respond, in a timely fashion,re-affirm their fundamental commitment to corporate governance developments. To gain a greater understandingthe principle of pre-emption. The Board is clear that the corporate governance framework within Barclays I encourage youextraordinary circumstances which they were required to read ‘Corporate Governance in Barclays’, which is available from our website.deal with were so unusual as to be effectively unique.

 

LOGOLOGO
Marcus Agius
Group Chairman
7th5th March 20082009

 

Statements of Compliance

UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance

As Barclays is listed on the London Stock Exchange, we comply with the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance (the Code). The Code was revised in June 2006 and the revised Code applied to Barclays with effect from 1st January 2007.Code. For the year ended 31st December 2007,2008, we have complied with the relevant provisions set out in section 1 of the Code and applied the principles of the Code as described in this report.

NYSE Corporate Governance Rules

Barclays has American Depositary Receipts listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and is thereforealso subject to the NYSE’s Corporate Governance rules (NYSE Rules). As a non-US company listed on the NYSE, weWe are exempt from most of the NYSE Rules, which domestic US companies must follow. Wefollow, because we are a non-US company listed on the NYSE. However, we are required to provide an Annual Written Affirmation to the NYSE of our compliance with the applicable NYSE Rules and must also to disclose any significant ways in whichdifferences between our corporate governance practices differ fromand those followed by domestic US companies listed on the NYSE. As our main listing is on the London Stock Exchange, we follow the UK’s Combined Code. Key differences between the Code and NYSE Rules and the Code are set out later in this report.

LOGO


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 117
 143


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

 

Corporate Governance Frameworkgovernance framework

LOGO

The overallGroup operates within a comprehensive governance framework, within which the Group operates is set out above.in the diagram below. Details of the Group’s risk management framework can be found on pages 6562 to 96.66.

The Board managesis responsible for managing the Company on behalf of its shareholders and each Director must act in a way that he or she considers promotes the shareholders. In order to runlong-term success of the business effectively,Company for the benefit of those shareholders as a whole. The Board also ensures that an appropriate balance between promoting long-term growth and delivering short-term objectives is achieved. The Board delegates responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Company to the Group Chief Executive, who is then responsible for ensuring that the business is operating effectively. The Group Chief Executive is supported by the Executive Committee, which he chairs. Thechairs, and the Executive Committee is supported by variousa number of management committees, including the Disclosure Committee. Details of the Disclosure Committee are set out on page 125. The rest of this154. This report describes the way in whichsets out how the Board and its Committees operatework within the governance framework.framework and corporate governance guidelines.

The terms of reference for each of the principal Board Committees are available from the Corporate Governance section at:http://www.aboutbarclays.com

There arehas eight scheduled Board meetings each year. One ofStrategy is reviewed regularly at these meetings and there is normally a day and a half off-siteoffsite meeting to consider and approve the Group’s strategy for the purposesnext year. In addition to the scheduled Board meetings in 2008, 23 additional Board meetings were held during the year. The purpose of consideringthese meetings was to discuss the difficult market conditions that existed during the year and approvingin particular the Group’s strategy.three equity capital raising transactions that were undertaken: the £4.5bn Placing and Open Offer in July (the ‘Open Offer’), the £701m Placing in September (the ‘Placing’) and the issue of £4.05bn in Mandatorily Convertible Notes, £3bn in Reserve Capital Instruments by Barclays Bank PLC and warrants for new ordinary shares in November (the ‘Capital Raising’). There were 12 Board meetings held in October and November specifically to discuss the Capital Raising. There were also eight meetings of the Board Finance Committee, to which the Board delegated authority to approve certain aspects of the capital raising transactions and the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses. The Board Finance Committee comprises the Group Chairman, the Group Chief Executive and at least two independent non-executive Directors, typically the Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Director.

These additional Board meetings, which were called at short notice, had attendance of 78% for the Open Offer (May-July 2008), 85% for the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses (September 2008) and 90% for the Capital Raising (October-November 2008). Attendance at the Board Finance Committee was 100%. Those Directors who were unable to attend any meeting were briefed separately on the discussions at the meetings and their views were sought.

We arrange scheduled Board and Committee meetings at least a year in advance. All Directors are expected to attend each meeting and the attendance at scheduled Board meetings is set out on page 149. All Directors are provided with background papers and relevant information in advance of each meeting. If a Director is unable to attend a meeting because of exceptional circumstances, he or she will still receive the supporting papers and will usually discuss with the Chairman of the meeting any matters they wish to raise to ensure their views are given due consideration. The Group Chairman usually meets privately with the non-executive Directors, beforewithout the executive Directors or any senior management present, ahead of each scheduled Board meeting in order to brief them on the business of the meeting and identifymeeting. These meetings give the non-executive Directors an opportunity to advise the Chairman if they have any shared areas of concern. In additionparticular questions they wish to the scheduled Board meetings in 2007, there were a further 13 Board meetings held in relation to the proposed merger with ABN AMRO and ten meetings of a specially appointed Committee of the Board (the ‘Transaction Committee’), comprising theraise. The Group Chairman, Group Chief Executive Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Director, which was establishedCompany Secretary are always available for the purpose of overseeingDirectors to discuss any issues relating to the proposed merger with ABN AMRO and considering various aspects of the proposed transaction. Attendance at the additional Board meetings which were often called at short notice, was 88.1%. Attendance ator other matters. In 2008, all Directors contributed the Transaction Committee was 100%.

Scheduled Board and Committee meetings are arranged well in advanceappropriate amount of time needed to ensure, as far as possible, that Directors can managefulfil their time commitments. All Directors are provided with supporting papers and relevant information for each meeting and are expected to attend, unless there are exceptional circumstances that prevent them from doing so. Attendance at the scheduled Board meetings is set out on page 121.responsibilities. Reasons for non-attendance are generally prior business, personal commitments or personal commitments. In the event that a Director is unableillness. Given market conditions in 2008, several meetings had to be rearranged at short notice and it was not always possible for all Directors to attend a meeting, they will still receiveon the papers for the meeting and will normally discuss any matters they wish to raise with the Chairman of the meeting to ensure their views are taken into account. In addition, all Directors are able to discuss any issues with the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive at any time. In the case of Leigh Clifford, who was unable to attend two meetings of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee in 2007 because of other commitments, including his relocation to Australia following his retirement as Chief Executive of Rio Tinto, he received the papers for the meetings he was unable to attend and provided comments to the Committee Chairman ahead of both meetings. In 2007, all Directors contributed the time necessary to discharge their responsibilities to the Board.revised date.

The Group Chairman works closely withand the Company Secretary work together to ensuremake sure that the information communicated to the Board is accurate, timely and clearclear. This applies in advance of regular, scheduled Board meetings and in exceptional circumstances between those meetings. Timely communication of information flowswas particularly important this year, given the need for the Board to the Board. Supporting papers for scheduled meetings are distributed the week before each meeting.respond to rapidly changing circumstances. Directors may also have secure access to electronic copies of meeting papers and other key documents quickly and securely via a dedicated Directors’ Intranet. Examples includeintranet, which includes past and current Board and Committee papers, reports, minutes, press coverage, analyst reports and material from trainingbriefing sessions. All Directors have access to theThe services of the Company Secretary and his team and canare available to all Directors. Directors may also take independent professional advice on request, at the Company’s expense.


118

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

The Board

Role of the Board

UnderDirectors are required, by UK company law, Directors mustto act in a way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of Barclays for the benefit of the shareholders as a whole. In doing so, the Directors must have regard (amongst other matters) to:

 

 

the likely consequences of any decision in the long-term;long term;

 

 

the interests of Barclays employees;


 

LOGO

144

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

 

the need to foster Barclays business relationships with suppliers, customers and others;

 

 

the impact of Barclays operations on the community and the environment;

 

 

the desirability of Barclays maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct; and

 

 

the need to act fairly as between shareholders of Barclays.

The role and responsibilities of the Barclays Board are set out in ‘Corporate Governance in Barclays’, which encompass theis available on our website atwww.aboutbarclays.com.

The duties of Directors, described above, are set out in Corporate Governance in Barclays.form part of their role and responsibilities. The Board is responsible to shareholders for creating and delivering sustainable shareholder value throughvalue. In order to achieve this it must establish the management of the Group’s businesses. It therefore determines the goalsobjectives and policies of the Group tothat will deliver such long-term value, providingvalue. The Board sets the overall strategic direction and ensures it is delivered within aan appropriate framework of rewards, incentivesreward, incentive and controls. The Board aims to ensure that management strikes an appropriate balance between promoting long-term growth and delivering short-term objectives.control.

TheAnother key responsibility of the Board is also responsible for ensuringto ensure that management maintains a system of internal control that provides assurance of effective and efficient operations, internal financial controls and compliance with law and regulation. In carrying out this responsibility, theThe Board has regard to what is appropriate forconsiders the Group’s business and reputation and ensures that the controls in place are appropriate to the materiality of the financial and other risks inherent in the business and the relative costs and benefits of implementing specific controls.

The Board has its powers set out in a formal schedule of matters reserved for the Board’s decision. A summary of the matters reserved for the Board is also the decision-making body for all otherset out opposite. These are matters of such importance as to be of significancethat are significant to the Group as a whole because of their strategic, financial or reputational implications or consequences. There is a formal scheduleThe Schedule of matters reserved forMatters Reserved to the Board’s decision, which is summarised in the panel above right.Board was reviewed and updated during 2008 to ensure it remains appropriate.

The chart below leftFigure 1 illustrates how the Board allocatedspent its time at its eightthe scheduled Board meetings during 2007. If the additional meetings relating to the proposed merger with ABN AMRO are taken into account, 49% of the Board’s time2008.

Activities in 2007 was spent on M&A. A typical Board2008

Typically, at each meeting, receives reports from the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director and will also be presented with an update onreport to the execution of strategy inBoard and one or two of the main businesses and functions. It willor functions also receivepresents an update on the progress of implementing the strategy. The Board also receives reports from each of the principal Board Committees and may also receive a reportreports from the Company Secretary on any relevant corporate governance matters.

LOGO

 

Summary of matters reserved for

Summary of Matters Reserved to the Board

 

   Approval of the Group’s strategy, Medium-Term and Short-Term Plans and Risk Appetite

–   Monitoring delivery of the strategy and performance against plan

–   Changes relating to capital structure or status as a PLC

–   Approval of annual Capital Plan

–   Approval of interim and final financial statements, dividends and any significant change in accounting policies or practices.practices

 

Approval   Authorisation of strategy.Directors’ conflicts or possible conflicts of interest

 

Major acquisitions, mergers or disposals.   Appointment (or removal) of Company Secretary

 

Major capital investments and projects.   Any share dividend alternative

 

Board appointments and removals.

Role profiles of key positions on the Board.

Terms of reference and membership of Board Committees.

Remuneration of auditors and recommendations for appointment or removal of auditors.auditors

–   Approval of all circulars, prospectuses and significant press releases

–   Principal regulatory filings with stock exchanges

–   Board appointments and removals

–   Role profiles of key positions on the Board

–   Terms of reference and membership of Board Committees

–   Major acquisitions, mergers or disposals

–   Major capital investments and projects

–   Approval of the framework for determining the policy and specific remuneration of executive Directors

–   Approval of Chairman and non-executive Director remuneration

–   Major changes in employee share schemes

–   Approval of Board and Board Committees performance evaluation process

–   Determination of independence of non-executive Directors

–   Approval of corporate governance framework

–   Approval of division of responsibilities between the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive

–   Rules and procedures for dealing in Barclays securities


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

145


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

The Board allocated its time at scheduled Board meetings during 2008 as follows:

received reports from the Group Chief Executive on strategic progress, matters considered by the Executive Committee and competitor activity;

 

 

Changes relating toreceived reports from the Group Finance Director on the financial position of the Group, which included capital structure or status as a PLC.management and liquidity updates throughout 2008;

 

 

Approvalreceived reports from each of all circulars, prospectuses and significant press releases.the Board Committees;

 

 

Principal regulatory filings with stock exchanges.received reports from the Group Risk Director on risk management and from the Group General Counsel on legal risk;

 

 

Rulesreceived reports from businesses or functions on progress against strategy, including Barclays Wealth, Barclays Capital, Barclaycard, Brand & Marketing, UK Retail Banking, Investment Banking and procedures for dealingInvestment Management in Barclays securities.Asia Pacific and GRCB – Emerging Markets;

 

 

Any share dividend alternative.approved the full year and half-year results for the Group;

 

 

Major changes in employee share schemes.received a report on the effectiveness of the Board following the performance review;

 

 

Appointment (or removal)received reports on peer group comparisons of company secretary.results following the release of preliminary and half-year results;

received reports on governance issues and updates on the changes in company law;

approved the revised fees recommended for non-executive Directors following a benchmarking comparison against our peer group;

received external presentations on shareholder sentiment, including institutional perceptions, Group Strategy, Global Retail and Commercial Banking, Investment Banking and Investment Management, performance, capital management and communications;

approved the strategy and Risk Appetite for the Group;

received reports on franchise health and the Employee Opinion Survey; and

received reports on the economic environment.

Adverse market conditions during 2008 led to the Board holding an additional 23 meetings during the year. These additional meetings discussed the impact of market conditions on performance, liquidity, the three capital raisings that were undertaken during the year and the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses. Ongoing and regular communication with the Board was vital during this period, a principle that had been established during the potential ABN AMRO acquisition in 2007. If the additional meetings relating to the capital raisings are taken into account, the Board spent 33% of its time on capital management.

LOGO

The capital raising that was announced on 31st October 2008 in response to the new higher capital targets which the FSA set for all UK Banks was the subject of considerable discussion. Seven Board meetings and three Board Finance Committee meetings were held during October to discuss the new requirements and Barclays response. The Board had to take some key decisions during this period, in particular:

���

whether or not to accept government money over the weekend of 11th/12th October 2008;

the decision to accelerate the timetable for raising required capital in the light of deteriorating market conditions;

the decision not to pursue a rights issue in the light of practical and market constraints; and

the decision to proceed with the Capital Raising as announced.

These decisions were only taken by the Board after rigorous discussion and having sought external advice. They were taken in the long-term interests of all shareholders.

Board structure and composition

The roles of the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive are separate. In line with the recommendations of the Code, there is a strong independent element on the Board and at least half the Board are independent non-executive Directors. At the date of this report, the Board is comprised of the Group Chairman, four executive Directors and 11 non-executive Directors. The balance of the Board is illustrated by Figure 2.

The Group Chairman’s main responsibility is to lead and manage the work of the Board, to ensureensuring that it operates effectively and fully discharges its legal and regulatory responsibilities.responsibilities effectively and fully. The Board has delegated the responsibility for the day-to-day managementrunning of the Group to the Group Chief Executive. The Group Chief Executive whoin turn leads the executive Directors in making and implementing operational decisions and is responsible for recommending strategy to the Board, leadingBoard.

Although the executive Directors and for making and implementing operational decisions.

The Board of Directors has collective responsibility for the success of the Group. However,Group, executive Directors have direct responsibilityare directly responsible for business operations, whereas non-executive Directors are responsible for bringing independent judgement and scrutiny to decisions taken by the Board, providing objective challenge to management.Board. The non-executive Directors must satisfy themselves on the integrity of financial information and that financial controls and systems of risk management are robust. The Board can draw onhas the widebenefit of a broad range of skills, knowledge and experience theythat the non-executive Directors have built up as Directors of other companies asor business leaders, in government or in academia. ItGiven the events of 2008 and the continuing uncertainty in the global financial services industry, the Board and, in particular, the Board Corporate Governance and


146

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Nominations Committee, is considering both the intentionappropriate size and skills mix of the Board. As a financial services business, the Board aims to appoint non-executive Directors who have the necessary skills and experience required for a proper understanding of the Group’s activities and associated risks. The Board also aims to have a broad spread ofdiverse geographical experience represented on the Board. The chart below right illustrates the geographical experience of the current non-executive Directors.Board and this is illustrated in Figure 3.

Barclays has adopted aThe Charter of Expectations, which sets out,forms part of ‘Corporate Governance in detail, the roles ofBarclays’, includes detailed role profiles for each of the main positions on the Board, including that of the Group Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Senior Independent Director and both non-executive and executive Directors. Sir Richard Broadbent continued in the role of Senior Independent Director in 2007. The Senior Independent Director is an additional contact pointResponsibilities general to all Directors include:

1.Providing entrepreneurial leadership of the Company, within a framework of prudent and effective controls, which enable risk to be assessed and managed.

2.Approving the Company’s strategic aims, ensuring that the necessary financial and human resources are in place for the Company to meet its objectives and review management performance.

3.Setting the Company’s values and standards and ensuring that its obligations to its shareholders and others are understood and met.

In addition, non-executive Directors have a responsibility to constructively challenge and also monitorsdevelop proposals on strategy whilst scrutinising the performance of management in meeting the Group Chairman on behalfGroup’s strategic objectives. Following appropriate challenge and debate, the Board expects to reach clear decisions and to provide a framework of support for the executive Directors in their management of the Board. Sir Nigel Rudd continued in the role of Deputy Chairman during 2007.Group’s business.

The Charter of Expectations, including role profiles for key Board positions, is available from:http://www.aboutbarclays.comwww.aboutbarclays.com.


LOGOSir Richard Broadbent continued in the role of Senior Independent Director during 2008. The role of the Senior Independent Director is to:

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

 119

Be available to shareholders if they have concerns relating to matters which contact through the normal channels of Group Chairman, Group Chief Executive or Group Finance Director has failed to resolve, or for which such contact is inappropriate.

 

Maintain contact as required with major shareholders to understand their issues and concerns, including attending meetings where necessary with shareholders to listen to their views in order to help develop a balanced understanding of the issues and concerns of major shareholders.


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

 

Meet with the non-executive Directors without the Group Chairman present at least annually and lead the Board in the ongoing monitoring and annual evaluation of the Group Chairman, including communicating results of the evaluation to the Group Chairman.

There isDuring the year, Sir Richard Broadbent attended meetings with a strong independent elementnumber of our institutional shareholders and shareholder bodies to discuss their views on the Group. Sir Richard also received feedback on the Group Chairman’s performance following the annual Board Effectiveness Review and in lineled discussions with the recommendationsother non-executive Directors and the Group Chief Executive on the Group Chairman’s performance.

Sir Nigel Rudd continued in the role of the Code, at least half the Board are independent non-executive Directors. At the date of this report, the Board is comprised ofDeputy Chairman in 2008, providing support to the Group Chairman five executive Directors and 12 non-executive Directors. The balance of the Board is illustrated by the chart below left.as required in carrying out his responsibilities.

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee is responsible for reviewing the structure, composition and balance of the Board and its principal Committees and for recommendingrecommends to the Board the appointment of any new Directors. These regularIt is important that the Board is refreshed regularly and the Committee conducts these reviews aim to ensure that there is an appropriate mix of skills and experience on the Board, taking into account the need to progressively refresh the Board. Details of the experience and skills of each of the current Directors are set out in their biographies on pages 111138 to 113.139. The length of tenure of the current non-executive Directors is illustrated byin Figure 4.

In line with the chart below right.

Allrecommendations of the Code, all Directors are required tousually seek re-election every three years and any Directors appointed during the year seek re-election at the next annual general meeting (AGM). However, for the 2009 AGM, as set out in the Group Chairman’s letter to shareholders dated 18th November 2008, all Directors will be seeking re-election, with the exception of Sir Nigel Rudd and Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, who has served onwill be retiring at the Board since 1996, seeks re-election annually. These periods are in line with the recommendationsconclusion of the Code.AGM. Details of Directors proposed for re-election are givenset out in the Notice of Shareholder Meetings, which is enclosed separately with this Report.Meeting.

ExecutiveExternal appointments contribute to an executive Director’s ongoing development and experience and executive Directors are allowedpermitted to serve on one other listed company board, in addition to their role at Barclays. Other appointments may be taken up with the approval of the Group Chairman. All external appointments are considered in line with the Group’s policy on Directors’ Conflicts of Interest and, if appropriate, each appointment is authorised by the Board. Further details of the Group’s policy on Directors’ Conflicts of Interest are set out on page 148.

Independence of non-executive Directors

The Code sets out circumstances that may be relevant to the Board in determining whether each non-executive Director is independent. Barclays Charter of Expectations sets out specific criteria, which the Board may find relevant when determiningconsiders are essential behaviours, to assess the independence of aeach non-executive Director. The Board considers that the following behaviours,Director, as set out in our Charter of Expectations, are essential for the Board to conclude an individual is independent:follows:

 

 

provides objective challenge to management;

 

 

is prepared to challenge others’other’s assumptions, beliefs or viewpoints as necessary for the good of the organisation;.

 

 

questions intelligently, debates constructively, challenges rigorously and decides dispassionately;


LOGO

BarclaysAnnual Report 2008147


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

 

 

is willing to stand up and defend their own beliefs and viewpoints in order to support the ultimate good of the organisation; and

 

 

has a good understanding of the organisation’s business and affairs to enable them to properly to evaluate the information and responses provided by management.

The Board considers non-executive Director independence on an annual basis, as part of each Director’s performance review.

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and subsequently the Board reviewed the independence of non-executive Directors in early 20082009 and concluded that each of them continues to demonstrate these essential behaviours. In determining that each of the non-executive Directors remains independent, the Board considered in particular the following:

 

 

Sir Nigel Rudd has served as a non-executive Director since 1996. The Code suggests that length of tenure is a factor to consider when determining independence.

The Code suggests that length of tenure is a factor that should be considered when determining whether a Director continues to be independent. As recommended by the Code, it is our policy that any Director who serves for more than nine years should seek annual re-election by shareholders and that all Directors subject to re-election should undergo a rigorous performance evaluation.

At the time of his appointment to the Board, Dr Danie Cronjé was Chairman of Absa. The Code suggests that such a business relationship is a factor to be considered by the Board when determining independence. The Code further suggests that cross-directorships may affect independence. Sir Nigel Rudd and Dr Cronjé are both non-executive Directors of Sappi Limited. Dr Cronjé retired as Chairman of Absa and left the Absa Board in 2007 and will not submit himself for re-election as a Director of Barclays when he retires at the 2008 AGM.

As a result of the annual performance review, the Board concluded that Sir Nigel Rudd and Dr Cronjé both continuecontinues to demonstrate the essential characteristics of independence expected by the Board. The Board continues to be regularly refreshed and the Board considers Sir Nigel’s length of service, and histhe resulting experience and knowledge of Barclays is viewed by the Boardhe has gained, as being especially valuable,valuable. This proved particularly as only one other non-executive Directorhelpful during the difficult market conditions in 2008. Sir Nigel has servedstood for more than six yearsre-election annually at each AGM since 2005. Sir Nigel will, however, retire at the 2009 AGM and the Board continues to be regularly refreshed.is not seeking re-election.

All Directors must report any changes in their circumstances to the Board and the Board reserves the right to terminate the appointment of a non-executive Director if there are any material changes in their circumstances that may conflict with their commitments as a Barclays Director or that may impact on their independence. Under UK company law, a Director must now seek authorisation before taking up any position with another company that conflicts, or may possibly conflict, with the Company’s interests. Barclays Articles of Association contain provisions to allow the Directors to authorise situations of potential conflicts of interest so that a Director is not in breach of his/her duty under company law. All existing external appointments for each Director were considered and authorised by the Board in September 2008 and additional external appointments have been authorised at subsequent Board meetings following notification to the Company Secretary. Each authorisation is set out in a Conflicts Register. The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee is responsible for conducting an annual review of the Conflicts Register and confirming to the Board that, where relevant, conflicts have been dealt with appropriately, and that the process for dealing with them is operating effectively.


 

LOGO

Conflicts of Interest

The following Directors’ Duties on Conflicts of Interest set out in the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) came into force on 1st October 2008:

–  a duty not to accept benefits from third parties;

–  a duty to avoid a situation in which he has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the company (situational conflicts); and

–  a duty to disclose any interest in a proposed or existing transaction or arrangement with the company (transactional conflicts).

Barclays Articles of Association were amended at the 2008 AGM to allow the Directors to authorise situational conflicts as permitted by the Act.

It is the responsibility of each Director to comply with the Act and Directors are required to notify Barclays in writing of any new situational or transactional conflicts. They are also required to consider the interests of their connected persons in case they amount to an indirect interest. Details of the potential conflict are submitted to the next Board meeting and the Directors, excluding the Director to whom the potential conflict relates, must carefully consider each potential conflict of interest before it is authorised, if appropriate.


 

120148 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 


LOGO

LOGO

Board and Committee Membership and Attendance

The table below sets out attendance of Directors at scheduled Board and Committee meetings in 2007.2008.

 

   Independent  Board  Board
Audit
Committee
  Board HR &
Remuneration
Committee
  Board
Corporate
Governance &
Nominations
Committee
  Board
Risk
Committee

Number of scheduled meetings

     8  8  4  2  4

Group Chairman

            

Marcus Agius

  OA  8    4  2  

Executive Directors

            

John Varley (Group Chief Executive)

  ED  8        

Robert E Diamond Jr

  ED  8        

Gary Hoffman

  ED  8        

Chris Lucas (joined the Board 1st April 2007)

  ED  6        

Frits Seegers

  ED  8        

Naguib Kheraj (left the Board 31st March 2007)

  ED  2        

Non-executive Directors

            

David Booth (joined the Board 1st May 2007)

  I  5        

Sir Richard Broadbent (Senior Independent Director)

  I  8    4  2  4

Leigh Clifford

  I  7    2    

Fulvio Conti

  I  7  6      

Dr Danie Cronjé

  I  8        4

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

  I  8  8      

Sir Andrew Likierman

  I  8  8      4

Sir Nigel Rudd (Deputy Chairman)

  I  8      2  

Stephen Russell

  I  8  8    2  4

Sir John Sunderland

  I  8    4  2  

 

    Independent  

Scheduled

Board

  

Additional

Board

  

Board

Audit

Committee

  

Board HR &

Remuneration

Committee

  Board
Corporate
Governance &
Nominations
Committee
  

Board

Risk

Committee

Number of meetings held

     7  23  10  5  2  4

Group Chairman

              

Marcus Agius

  OA  7  23    5  2  

Executive Directors

              

John Varley (Group Chief Executive)

  ED  7  23        

Bob Diamond

  ED  7  22        

Gary Hoffman (left the Board 31st August 2008)

  ED  5  7        

Chris Lucas

  ED  7  23        

Frits Seegers

  ED  6  20        

Non-executive Directors

              

David Booth

  I  7  22        4

Sir Richard Broadbent (Senior Independent Director)

  I  7  21    5  2  4

Leigh Clifford

  I  7  13    4    

Fulvio Conti

  I  7  17  9      

Dr Danie Cronjé (left the Board 24th April 2008)

  I  2          1

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

  I  7  21  10      

Sir Andrew Likierman

  I  7  18  8      4

Sir Michael Rake

  I  6  21  7      

Sir Nigel Rudd (Deputy Chairman)

  I  7  20      2  

Stephen Russell

  I  6  13  10    2  3

Sir John Sunderland

  I  7  20    4  1  

Patience Wheatcroft

  I  7  22        

Key

OAIndependent on appointment

EDExecutive Director

IIndependent non-executive Director

Board Committees

In order forCertain responsibilities of the Board are delegated to carryBoard Committees to assist the Board in carrying out its functions and to ensure independent oversight of internal control and risk management, certain aspectsmanagement. Membership of its role are delegated to Board Committees whoseis recommended to the Board by the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, which reviews Committee composition and balance regularly to ensure the Committees are refreshed. All members of principal Board Committees are non-executive Directors. TheDirectors, although the Chairman is a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. Each Board Committee’s terms of reference set out the specific matters for which delegated authority has been given are set out in each Board Committee’sgiven. These terms of reference, which are available on our website, are reviewed annually.

The Board has delegated authority to four principal Board Committees:

 

 

Board Audit Committee

 

 

Board Risk Committee

 

 

Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee

 

 

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

The Board appoints Committee members on the recommendation of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, which regularly reviews Committee composition and balance and the need for refreshment. The number of scheduled meetings held and attendance at the Committee meetings is set out above in ‘Board and Committee Membership and Attendance’. The activities of the Board Committees report on their activitiesare set out on the following pages.pages 149 to 154.

The terms of reference for each of the principal Board Committees are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

121


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Board Audit Committee

 

Stephen Russell (Chairman)

Fulvio Conti

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

Sir Andrew Likierman

Sir Michael Rake (from 1st January 2008)

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

 

The Board Audit Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:http://www.aboutbarclays.com.

ThereIn addition to the members of the Committee, there are a number of regular attendees at each meeting, including themeeting. The Group Chief Executive, Group Finance Director, Barclays Internal Audit Director, BarclaysGroup Risk Director, BarclaysGroup General Counsel and the lead external audit partner.partner normally attend all scheduled Board Audit Committees. The Board Audit Committee members usually meet privately before each meeting to raise any concerns with the Chairman of the meeting and they also meet with the external auditors and the Barclays Internal Audit Director, without management present, as partat the end of most Committee meetings. Sir Andrew Likierman continued incontinues to fulfil his role as the ‘financial expert’ as defined by the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, has ‘recent and relevant financial experience’ as recommended by the Code, as a result of his accountancy background and his career with HM Treasury. SinceTreasury, has ‘recent and relevant financial experience’ as recommended by the year end,Code. Sir Michael Rake a formerwill succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Committee in March 2009. Sir Michael has significant audit experience having worked at KPMG from 1972-2007 where he was Chairman of KPMG International has been appointed a member of the Committee.from 2002-2007.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

149


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Activities in 20072008

The chart belowFigure 5 illustrates how the Committee spentallocated its time in 2007.2008. During 2007,2008, the Committee:

considered the information it would require during the coming year to enable it to discharge its responsibilities;

considered the significant changes in financial markets and economic conditions and the impact on the areas of focus for the Committee;

reviewed the Annual Report and Accounts and half-year Results and Interim Management Statements;

reviewed in detail the valuations of Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures, reviewing mark-to-market valuations and accounting for derivatives and assessing the overall quality of earnings;

reviewed the Group’s accounting policies and, in particular, the accounting for leveraged loans;

 

 

considered control issues of Group level significance for different areas of the business;

 

 

received reports on the control environment in each of the following areas: Barclaycard, BGI,businesses or functions: Barclays Wealth, Barclays Commercial Bank, Western Europe, Global Retail and Commercial Banking IT, Barclaycard, Global Payments, Emerging Markets, GRCB IT, UK Retail BankingBGI, Absa and Barclays Capital;

 

 

reviewed the effectiveness and independence of the Group statutory auditor;

 

 

monitoredapproved the performancere-appointment, remuneration and engagement letter of the Internal Audit function;

reviewed internal control and risk management systems;Group statutory auditor;

 

 

considered the provision of non-audit services by the Group statutory auditor – more details can be found in the panel opposite;

approved the re-appointment, remuneration and engagement letter of the Group statutory auditor;

reviewed the Annual Report and Accounts and Preliminary and Interim Results;

considered the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting;box on page 151;

 

 

received reports from the external and internal auditors;

 

 

monitored the performance of the Internal Audit function;

reviewed the Global Internal Audit Plan;

 

 

received regular reports on concerns raised by employees (whistleblowing – more details can be found on page 123);reviewed the internal control and risk management systems;

LOGO

considered the Fraud Risk Control Framework.

LOGO

The Committee also received regular updates during 2007 on:

Basel II;

MiFID;

Sarbanes-Oxley compliance; and

Sanctions compliance.

In February 2008, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2007 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Non-audit services policy

The Committee takes seriously its responsibility to put in place safeguards to auditor objectivity and independence. It has therefore established a policy on the provision of services by the Group’s statutory auditor. The Policy describes the circumstances in which the Auditor may be permitted to undertake non-audit work for the Group. The Committee oversees compliance with the Policy and considers and approves requests to use the Auditor for non-audit work. Allowable non-audit services require pre-approval before they can be carried out. For allowable services, the Committee has pre-approved all assignments where the expected fee does not exceed £100,000, or £10,000 in the case of certain taxation services. Any assignment where the expected fee is above the relevant threshold requires specific approval from the Committee or a member of the Committee. The Company Secretary and his team deal with day-to-day administration of the Policy, facilitating requests for approval by the Committee. The Committee receives a report at each meeting on the non-audit services provided by the Auditor and the Policy is reviewed by the Committee annually. Details of the services that are prohibited and allowed are set out below.

Services that are prohibited include:

bookkeeping

design and implementation of financial information systems

appraisal or valuation services

actuarial services

internal audit outsourcing

management and Human Resource functions

broker or dealer, investment advisor or investment banking services

legal, expert and tax services involving advocacy

Allowable services that may be approved include:

statutory and regulatory audit services and regulatory non-audit services

other attest and assurance services

accountancy advice and training

risk management and controls advice

transaction support

taxation services

business support and recoveries

translation services


 

122

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Approval of financial statements

Barclays has in place a strong governance process to support its framework of disclosure controls and procedures. That process, in which the Board Audit Committee plays a key role, is illustrated below.

LOGO

The membership of the Disclosure Committee and its role is set out on page 125. The Legal and Technical Review Committee is an accounting, legal and regulatory compliance committee, which is responsible for reviewing the Group’s financial reports and disclosures and for ensuring they have been subject to adequate verification. Meetings are attended by the Group’s external US lawyers and auditors. This governance process ensures that there is sufficient opportunity for both management and the Board to review and challenge the Group’s financial statements and other significant disclosures before publication. It also provides assurance for the certifications made by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and recommended by the Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control. Further details of the Group’s system of internal control and an assessment of its effectiveness may be found on page 143.

Whistleblowing

Barclays takes any concerns of employees about the integrity and honesty of other employees very seriously and will investigate where appropriate. Information leaflets are distributed encouraging employees to report any behaviours or actions that they reasonably believe might be against accounting or regulatory requirements, as well as our internal policies. Dedicated whistleblowing hotlines and email addresses are in place so employees can talk about what has happened, or is happening, directly and in confidence. The Board Audit Committee receives reports of instances of whistleblowing and any resulting investigations.

Board Audit Committee Chairman’s Statement

 

We had eight scheduledheld ten meetings in 20072008 and the report set out above describes in some detailan overview of how we used our meetings. meetings is set out below.

Our areas of focus in 2008 were dominated by the continuing disruption to the credit markets and financial services sector as a whole. In early 2008, we held a separate session of the Committee on accounting for and valuation of derivatives and complex financial instruments and also reviewed the Group’s valuation methodology for these instruments. The latter comprises trading desk evaluation supported by independent price testing and benchmarking, followed by a review by Finance and Risk and by the external auditor.

When considering the Group’s preliminary and half-year results and interim management statements, we spent a significant amount of time reviewing the disclosures around and the fair value of Barclays Capital’s credit markets exposures, including asset backed securities and leveraged credit positions. As part of the approval of each results statement, we reviewed the fair value of the credit market exposures and the form and content of the disclosures. The review of the credit market exposure valuations included a review of marks by key asset categories, movements in exposures (including sales/paydowns) and a review of underlying collateral by vintage and rating. The Committee received at both the half-year and year-end and before each Interim Management Statement a specific presentation from Barclays Capital’s Chief Operating Officer and discussed the valuations with the Group Finance Director, Group Risk Director and, importantly, the Group’s external auditors. Reassurance was sought from independent Group control functions such as Risk and Finance, and the external auditors, that the individual marks were appropriate. The Committee was reassured that there were no significant variations between the prices at which assets were sold and the underlying marks. The Committee was content that the markets and models to which the valuations are marked are sufficiently robust to enable reliable and relevant valuations to be determined.

We also reviewed the controls around Barclays Capital’s complex financial instruments, as well as reviewing the overall control environment at Barclays Capital. The Committee has sought to learn lessons from events at our peers, receiving reports on the circumstances surrounding losses experienced at Société Générale and UBS. We discussed the overall impact of market conditions and the challenging financial markets on the remit of the Committee and this will help shape our agenda for 2009.

In the second half of the year, as the financial crisis started to evolve into a global economic downturn, the Committee directed increasing attention at the deepening economic downturn, reviewing the key controls by which consequent risk can be managed. As a result, impairment measurement, fraud controls, collections activities and day-to-day credit controls and security documentation are receiving increased scrutiny from the Committee. During the year we also received additional presentations and reports on the impact of the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North

American businesses in September 2008, including an initial assessment of the risks and controls in that business and a report on the impact of the acquisition on financial reporting. In reviewing the Internal Audit Plan for 2009, we also challenged management to make sure that the Internal Audit function is appropriately resourced for the challenges ahead and is directing its attention on areas likely to come under pressure in the expected downturn.

Impairment numbers continue to be closely reviewed by the Committee. It reviews a paper prepared by the Risk function, which examines impairment on a business-by-business basis. It examines closely any amendments or overrides to models, compares trends and impairment levels with peers and seeks independent reassurance from the external auditor.

Our reviews of the control environment in each of our businesses in 2007 had a particular2008 continued to focus on those areas where the Group’s business is expanding or which are deemed to be higher risk.risk, including Emerging Markets. We also continued to reviewreviewed the controls around our key regulatory programmes, in particular, Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II. II, and received regular reports on Sanctions compliance and Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering controls.

The second halfinternal and external auditors are evaluated annually. Feedback on both is sought from key stakeholders in the Group via questionnaires with the results being presented to and discussed by the Committee. The Committee is satisfied with the performance of both auditors. During 2009, an external assessment of the year saw significant disruptioninternal audit function will be undertaken. The Committee has recommended to the credit marketsBoard and we held two additional meetings to reviewshareholders that PwC should be re-appointed as the Group’s auditors at the AGM on 23rd April 2009. We are fully satisfied that PwC provides effective, independent challenge to management, which has been crucial in the current difficult environment, and consider the statements made by the Group on its exposureshas provided valued support to the sub-prime market.Committee in the advice given and the clarity of their briefings and reports. The Committee discussedfeedback received from other stakeholders through the timing and contentannual evaluation exercise has been positive.

As Chairman of the statementsCommittee, I have liaised as appropriate with the Chairman of the Board HR and the process that had been followedRemuneration Committee, particularly to prepare the statements, including the internal reviews conducted. We also reviewed Barclays Capital’s control environment and how effectively it had operated during the difficult market conditions.

In light of market events in 2007, in February 2008 we held a separate session for Committee members on accounting for and valuation of derivatives and complex investment banking instruments and subsequently considered a report reviewing the loan impairment and mark-to-market valuations aheaddraw attention to any specific aspects of the Group’s 2007 preliminary results.results which I feel he ought to be aware of when determining appropriate levels of compensation.

 

LOGOThe Committee can confirm that it received sufficient, reliable and timely information from management to enable it to fulfil its responsibilities.

 

LOGO

Stephen Russell

Chairman of the Board Audit Committee

7th5th March 20082009


 

150

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

considered the effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls over financial reporting;

received regular reports on ‘Raising Concerns’, including whistleblowing;

considered the Fraud Risk Control Framework; and

reviewed its Terms of Reference to satisfy itself that they enable the Committee to fulfill its responsibilities.

The Committee also received regular updates during 2008 on:

Basel II

MiFID

Sarbanes-Oxley

Sanctions compliance

In February 2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Approval of financial statements

Barclays has a strong governance process in place to support its framework of disclosure controls and procedures. That process, in which the Board Audit Committee plays a key role, is illustrated in Figure 6.

The Legal and Technical Review Committee is an accounting, legal and regulatory compliance committee, which is responsible for reviewing the Group’s financial reports and disclosures to ensure that they have been subject to adequate verification and comply with legal and technical requirements. Meetings are attended by the Group’s auditors and US lawyers. The membership of the Disclosure Committee and its role is set out on page 154. The membership of the Executive Committee and its role is set out on pages 153 and 154.

This governance process is in place to ensure both management and the Board are given sufficient opportunity to review and challenge the Group’s financial statements and other significant disclosures before they are made public. It also provides assurance for the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director when providing certifications as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and recommended by the Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control. Further details of the Group’s system of internal control and an assessment of its effectiveness may be found on page 173.

Non-Audit Services Policy

The Committee takes seriously its responsibility to put in place safeguards to auditor objectivity and independence. It has therefore established a policy on the provision of services by the Group’s statutory auditor. The Policy describes the circumstances in which the auditor may be permitted to undertake non-audit work for the Group. The Committee oversees compliance with the Policy and considers and approves requests to use the auditor for non-audit work. Allowable services are pre-approved up to £100,000, or £10,000 in the case of certain taxation services. The Company Secretary and his team deal with day-to-day administration of the Policy, facilitating requests for approval by the Committee. The Committee receives a report at each meeting on the non-audit services provided by the auditor and the Policy is reviewed by the Committee annually. Details of the services that are prohibited and allowed are set out below.

Services that are prohibited include:

–  bookkeeping

–  design and implementation of financial information systems

–  appraisal or valuation services

–  actuarial services

–  internal audit outsourcing

–  management and Human Resource functions

–  broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services

–  legal, expert and tax services involving advocacy

Allowable services that the Committee will consider for approval include:

–  statutory and regulatory audit services and regulatory non-audit services

–  other attest and assurance services

–  accountancy advice and training

–  risk management and controls advice

–  transaction support

–  taxation services

–  business support and recoveries

–  translation services


LOGO

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 123
 151


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

 

Board Risk Committee

 

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

David Booth (from 1st January 2008)

Dr Danie Cronjé (to 24th April 2008)

Sir Andrew Likierman

Stephen Russell

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

 

Risk is a key parameter of Barclays business. Accordingly, the Board has established a Board Risk Committee to provide Board level monitoring and oversight of all Barclays risk activities.

The Board Risk Committee’sCommittee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:http://www.aboutbarclays.com.

In addition to its members,the Members of the Committee, all meetings are usually attended by the Group Finance Director and the BarclaysGroup Risk Director. Attendees at meetings may also include Barclays Internal Audit Director, BarclaysGroup General Counsel and the Barclays external auditor, as well as other senior executives, who joinalso attend meetings of the Board Risk Committee, where appropriate.

The Board recognises that risk is a key parameter for specific topics.the business.

The Board Risk Committee provides monitoring and oversight of all Barclays risk activities. During 2008, the Committee received presentations and updates on key aspects of the external market conditions to ensure it was able to maintain an appropriate level of oversight and report effectively to the Board.

ApproachActivities in 2008

The Committee approachesmet four times in 2008 and Figure 7 shows how the Committee allocated its task primarily by:time at those meetings. During 2008, the Committee:

 

 

receiving fromreceived regular reports on, and considered, Risk Appetite and the BarclaysGroup’s risk profile, including key indicators for Risk DirectorAppetite, Group Impairment, Retail Credit Risk, Wholesale Credit Risk, Market Risk, Financial Crime, Operational Risk and discussing a detailed risk report at every meeting;Economic Capital;

 

 

reviewing in depth specific topics or areas of risk thatreviewed at each meeting updates on asset backed securities and leveraged credit markets, including the Committee identifies as meriting detailed analysis;Group’s exposures to sub-prime and Alt-A markets, monoline insurers and leveraged loan underwriting positions;

 

 

reviewing stress scenarios;reviewed updates on liquidity risk;

 

 

reviewing historicreviewed risk tendenciestrends and experiences;risk management in GRCB – Emerging Markets and South Africa;

 

 

monitoring risk appetitereceived regular Forward Risk Trends reports, which set out the internal and the Group’s risk profile. The Committee recommends to the Board each year an appropriate level and compositionexternal indicators that are showing signs of risk for the coming year.strain;

In addition, the Committee:

 

 

reviewsreviewed the internal control framework;

 

 

examinesexamined the risk control framework, and approvesapproved Group policies including the trading book policy, large exposures policy, liquidity policy, retail and wholesale credit impairment policypolicies and the Group’s principal risks policy; and

 

 

receivesreviewed Group-wide stress testing scenarios and results;

reviewed in greater detail the process around setting annual Risk Appetite to establish the effectiveness of the process in responding to significant changes in economic and market conditions;

reviewed the programme of actions being taken Group-wide to mitigate risk in view of deteriorating economic conditions in our major markets, such as the UK, US, South Africa and Spain;

reviewed the Risk Appetite for the Group for 2009 and made recommendations to the Board; and.

received updates on risk measurement methodologies.Basel II.

Activities in 2007

The Committee requested at the end of 2006 that the US mortgage business be reviewed early in the year as one of the key risk issues. This was presented in March 2007 and included an analysis of stress loss scenarios under adverse market conditions. Management took decisions during the first half of 2007 to reduce limits in this business and, given the volatility in the credit markets during 2007, the Committee subsequently received regular reports on market conditions.

LOGO

During 2007, the Committee also reviewed, in depth, leveraged credit and asset backed securities markets, including the Group’s counterparty exposures. It considered whether there were any signs of material contagion in other markets in which the Group operates. The Committee examined how the Group’s risk controls and stress limits had operated in the prevailing market conditions and was satisfied that risk controls had operated as anticipated. The Committee reviewed the impact on impairment and mark-to-market positions and the impact on the Group’s balance sheet of the market conditions. The Committee also monitored progress in meeting the new capital regime introduced under Basel II and continued to review the retail credit experience.

The chart below left shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2007.

Board Risk Committee Chairman’s Statement

2008 was a challenging year for risk management and this was reflected in the work of the Committee, which is detailed below. Particular areas worthy of note were:

–  The Committee monitored the Group’s sub-prime exposures throughout the year. The reduction in limits and scale of the sub-prime business in 2007 reduced the impact of the crisis, although substantial write-downs were still required during 2008, reflecting a further deterioration in the markets and underlying performance of the assets.

–  The Committee also monitored the Group’s exposure to other areas affected by the crisis, including other asset-backed securities, commercial mortgages and monoline insurers.

–  The Committee reviewed and compared the write-downs being taken in the sub-prime and related areas with those being taken by the industry.

–  The Committee monitored carefully the Group’s overall risk exposure in the light of the anticipated worsening in economic conditions and reviewed management plans to manage and mitigate the effects of the expected downturn in multiple markets.

–  The Committee also monitored the capital position throughout the year relative to regulatory requirements and the Group’s overall risk appetite. Several steps were taken throughout the year to strengthen the capital base prior to the events of October 2008 when the regulator changed the capital requirements for banks, requiring a further and substantial capital raising.

–  The Committee played an active role in informing Board debate about Risk Appetite and capital planning for 2009.

LOGO

Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman of the Board Risk Committee

5th March 2009

In March 2008,2009, the Committee will review its activities in 20072008 against its terms of reference.

More information on risk management and the internal control framework can be found in the Risk management report on pages 6557 to 73.136.


152

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Board Corporate Governance and

Nominations Committee

 

Marcus Agius (Chairman)

Sir Richard Broadbent

Sir Nigel Rudd

Stephen Russell

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

 

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:http://www.aboutbarclays.comwww.aboutbarclays.com.

The meetings are also attended by the Group Chief Executive.

Activities in 20072008

The chart below rightFigure 8 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2007.2008. During 2007,2008, the Committee:

 

 

regularly reviewed Board and Board Committee composition to ensure the right mix of skills and experience are present;

 

 

recommended the appointment of David Booth, Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft as non-executive Directors;

monitored the progress of the action plan arising from the 20062007 Board Effectiveness Review and oversaw the conduct of the 20072008 Board Effectiveness Review;

 

 

reviewed the corporate governance disclosures for the 20062007 Annual Report and considered the proposed disclosures for 2007;2008;

 

 

reviewed and updated Corporate Governance in Barclays and the Charter of Expectations; and

 

 

reviewed succession plans for the Executive Committee and the position of Group Chief Executive.


LOGO

124

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

The Committee also received updates on:

 

 

the status of the Companies Act 2006 and, in particular, the new statutory statement of Directors’ Duties; and

the FRC’s reviewDuties on Conflicts of the Combined Code.Interest.

During 2007,2008, the Committee reviewed the composition of the Board and its principal Committees at each of its meetings. Following those deliberations, the Committee recommended to the Board that Sir Michael Rake succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the appointments of David Booth (May 2007),Board Audit Committee with effect from March 2009. No new Directors were appointed to the Board during 2008, other than Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft, (January 2008) aswho joined the Board with effect from 1st January 2008.

Given that Sir Nigel Rudd and Professor Dame Sandra Dawson will be retiring from the Board at the 2009 AGM and Stephen Russell will be retiring in October 2009 on completion of nine years’ service, the Committee also discussed both Board size and future Board composition and, in particular, given the continuing crisis in the world financial services industry, the type of skills and experience required in new non-executive Directors.

In the case of David Booth,early 2009, the Committee had concluded that a non-executive Director with US banking experience would bring the skills and experience to the Board that had been lost on the retirement of Robert Steel as a non-executive Director in late 2006. In the case of Sir Michael Rake, the Committee sought a non-executive Director with a financial and auditing background. Patience Wheatcroft has extensive experience of institutional fund management should be sought and, with the highest levelsassistance of business and politics, which will bring additional valuable skills and a wider perspective to the Board. When considering appointments, the Committee typically engages external search consultants, who are providedSimon Fraser was identified as a candidate with a specification of the skills and experience required, to assist with identifying potential candidates, although candidates may be recommended to the Committee from other sources. Each of David Booth, Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroftdesired experience. He met with members of the Board Corporate Governance & Nominations Committee priorand his appointment was recommended to the Committee considering their appointmentsBoard, who approved his appointment as a Director. Simon will join the Board on 10th March 2009, subject to regulatory approvals.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into between Barclays and recommendations being madeChina Development Bank (CDB) in August 2007 for the subscription of Barclays ordinary shares, CDB retain the right to nominate a non-executive Director to the Board.Board of Barclays but did not take up this right during 2008.

In January 2008,2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 20072008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

 

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

Marcus Agius

Leigh Clifford

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Patrick Gonsalves

 

The Board HR and Remuneration Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:http://www.aboutbarclays.com

The Committee’s independent advisers, from Towers Perrin MGMCAdditional information on the role and Kepler Associates, attended 2 meetings and 1 meetingactivities of the Committee respectivelycan be found in 2007.the Remuneration Report on pages 157 to 173, including the Group’s revised philosophy on remuneration, an explanation of the Group’s remuneration arrangements and a description of the framework for future decisions in this area.

LOGO

Activities in 20072008

The chart belowFigure 9 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2007. 2008. The Committee held additional meetings in November 2008 and January 2009, as a result of the rapidly changing economic environment and the intense scrutiny from regulators and other interested parties that the issue of remuneration has received.

During 2007,2008 the Committee:

 

 

held discussions with external adviserscontinued to review the Committee;compensation frameworks in place for each area of the Group;

 

 

reviewed executive compensation;

 

 

considered resourcing, compensation and incentives for staff;reviewed the Group’s approach to remuneration in light of market conditions;

 

 

considered pensions, mobilityapproved the Pensions Strategy and relocationother pension matters; and

reviewed global staff benefits;

monitored the implementation of the talent agenda;

 

 

reviewed the compensation frameworksGroup’s Health and overall level of bonus pools for each of the Group’s principal businesses.

The Committee received updates on:

revised ABI Guidelines on Executive Remuneration;Safety and Diversity and Inclusion performance;

 

 

talent;considered incentive funding for 2008 for each main business area;

 

 

healthreviewed, current and safety;future, Group and business long-term incentive arrangements; and

 

 

equality and diversity.held discussions with external advisers to the Committee on a range of issues, including obtaining market data on remuneration levels in specified markets.

In February 2008, theThe Committee reviewedreceived valuable support and advice from its activities in 2007 against its terms of referenceindependent advisers, Towers Perrin MGMC and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.Kepler Associates.

Detailed information on the role and activities of the Committee can be found in the Remuneration Report on pages 128 to 142.

Management

Executive Committee

The executive Directors bear the responsibility (underUnder the leadership of the Group Chief Executive)Executive, the executive Directors are responsible for managing the Group’s business and making and implementingexecuting operational decisions and running the Group’s business.decisions. The Executive Committee supports the Group Chief Executive. ItExecutive and it meets fortnightlyevery fortnight to develop strategiesdiscuss strategy development and policies to recommend to the Board and to implement approved strategy.Board. The Executive Committee is also responsible for implementing approved strategy and is supported by other Committees, including the Disclosure Committee.


Executive Committee

LOGO

 

 

John Varley (Chairman)Barclays

Annual Report 2008

 

Bob Diamond

 

Chris Lucas

153


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

 

Frits Seegers

Executive Committee

 

Paul Idzik

John Varley (Chairman)

Bob Diamond

Chris Lucas

Frits Seegers

Disclosure Committee

The Disclosure Committee is chaired by Chris Lucas, the Group Finance Director. Members include the Company Secretary, BarclaysGroup General Counsel, Head ofDirector, Investor Relations, BarclaysGroup Risk Director, Head ofBarclays Corporate Affairs Director, Group Financial Controller and Barclays Treasurer. The Committee:

 

 

considers and reviews the preliminary and interimhalf-year results, Annual Report/Annual Report on Form 20F and the Annual Review; and

 

 

considers Interim Management Statements released to the Stock Exchange; andExchange.

considers the content, accuracy and tone of any other announcement that isThe Committee also considers the content, accuracy and tone of significant other announcements that are proposed to be made in accordance with the FSA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

The Committee reports to the Executive Committee and also reports to the Board Audit Committee.Committee, documenting its conclusions about the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures. This forms part of the combined assurance given to the


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

125


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Board Audit Committee together with the report on the Turnbull Review of Internal Controls recommended by the Code.

Board Effectiveness

Performance Review

An annualThe Code recommends that an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and Committee effectivenessits Committees is conducted as recommended by the Code.annually. The evaluation in 20062007 was independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International. All Directors were sent a questionnaire to complete and return to Egon Zehnder International and comprised a questionnaire, supplemented bythese were discussed in individual interviews, andwhich included peer reviews.review. The following actions were setagreed for 2007:2008:

 

 

provision of additional training on risk issues for non-executive Directors, including specific awareness of risk management and measurement methodologies for Board Risk Committee members; and

continued work on Board meeting agenda management to ensure there is time for rigorous debate and exchange of ideas.

Training on risk issues was provided in April 2007 and feedback sought from the participants. The time allocated to Board meetings has been increased to allow for extended debate and discussion. The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee monitored the progress of the action plan during 2007 and are satisfied with the steps taken to tackle the issues highlighted by the evaluation.

The 2007 evaluation was again independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International. The evaluation took the form of detailed questionnaires completed by each Director, individual interviews and peer evaluation of fellow Directors. The results of the evaluation were presented to the Board in February 2008 and continued to demonstrate the improving trend since the current process of evaluation was adopted in 2004. The Board concluded that the Board and the principal Board Committees continue to operate effectively. Minor enhancements were recommended around:

minor enhancements around the form and content of Board papers and presentations; and

 

 

refinement torefining the Board calendar of business.

The 2008 evaluation was again independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International and took the form of detailed questionnaires, which were completed by each Director, individual interviews and peer evaluation of fellow Directors. As in previous years, the evaluation covered the following areas:

Group performance;

Strategy and performance objectives;

Reporting to shareholders/stakeholders;

Structure, people, succession planning and remuneration;

Decision-making process;

Information flows;

Board structure and composition;

Board roles and responsibilities;

Board and Management relationships;

Board meetings; and

Board Committees.

The results of the evaluation were presented to the Board in December 2008. The results from the overall review showed a continuation of the five-year trend of improving scores and the Board concluded that the Board and the principal Board Committees continue to operate effectively in terms of communication, information flows and Directors’ participation and engagement, particularly during the period of difficult market conditions in 2008. The Directors recognised however, and were disappointed, that Group performance has not met shareholder expectations and acknowledged that they are accountable to shareholders for their stewardship of the Group during the exceptional events of 2008.

From the results of the 2008 evaluation, action points and issues that were discussed included:

continued focus on the Board’s calendar of business particularly in respectto ensure that non-critical items are removed or kept to a minimum, thereby ensuring that sufficient time can be allocated to items fundamental to the success of the timingGroup;

refinements to the Board’s calendar of business, including additional time to be spent on items such as compensation strategy and contentsuccession planning;

the overall size and composition of presentations on stakeholder management.the Board; and

refinements to the process for evaluating the performance of individual Directors.

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee will recommendhas agreed an action plan to the Board to deliver theseprogress improvements in 2008.2009.

TheIn terms of individual Director performance, the Group Chairman will holdheld private meetings with each Director to discuss thenon-executive Directors in early 2009 so that individual and general results and to agree areas for developmentcould be discussed. Development plans relating to their own individual performance. Feedback on the Group Chairman’s performance was provided to thewere agreed. The Senior Independent Director who discussed the resultsmet privately with the other non-executive Directors and the Group Chief Executive before meetingto discuss feedback he received on the Group Chairman’s performance. These results were then shared with the Group Chairman.

TrainingDirector Development and Business Awareness

A three part trainingcomprehensive development and awareness programme is in place for Directors. This comprises:

 

 

an induction training,programme, when they join the Board;

 

 

training and awareness ofbriefings on the business of Barclays; and

 

 

training and awareness ofbriefings on external technical matters.

Induction

All new Directors receive an information pack thatinduction presentation, which explains those disclosures they are obliged to make to the Company to comply with various laws and regulations. A presentation is given to all new Directors, which outlines their responsibilities as a Director of a global, listed company and provides an overview of the Group and its businesses. EachAn information pack, that gives details of the disclosures that Directors are obliged to make to the Company to comply with various laws and regulations, is also provided to each new Director. A personal induction programme is scheduled with each new Director then has a tailored induction programme toso that they can further familiariseacquaint themselves with the Group and its businesses. This takes the form ofEach new Director attends sessions with each of the executive Directors and the heads of the main Group functions, andwhich includes opportunities to visit operational sites to meet with senior management and employees. Once they have completed the firstThe second part of their induction and have a good overview of the Group, they then have furtherprogramme includes additional sessions with the executive Directors and senior managers from each of the principalGroup’s main business units to gain aprovide the new Director with detailed and in depthin-depth understanding of their business, which includesthose businesses. The sessions focus on the challenges, opportunities and risks that are faced by each. Marcus Agiuseach business unit. Sir Michael Rake and David BoothPatience Wheatcroft undertook their induction training in 2007. A reportprogrammes during 2008.

In 2008, non-executive Directors were asked to complete a questionnaire and give feedback on topics on which they would like to receive additional briefings. Two in-depth briefing sessions were arranged during 2008 on impairment recognition and forecasting and on Barclays Capital’s traded products, including asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and collateralised debt obligations.

The Board and the Group Chairman’s induction programme is set out inBoard Audit and Board Risk Committees received further briefings to ensure they were kept up to date with the panel above.changing global economic conditions, including updates on capital management, presentations on asset-backed securities and liquidity risk, mark-to-market valuations and briefing material to support the various capital raising proposals and acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

Group Chairman’s Induction

Since joining the Barclays Board in September 2006 and becoming Group Chairman in January 2007, I have been involved in a wide-ranging programme of meetings and familiarisation visits to help me get to know Barclays, our colleagues and customers.

The programme began in 2006, when I met with each member of the Executive Committee and senior management across each of the business areas and head office functions of Barclays. To broaden my understanding of the Barclays businesses, I have this year visited Retail Banking branches in the UK and Africa, Barclays Commercial Bank services in Stratford and Gadbrook Park, Barclaycard in Northampton, Barclays Capital in New York, Barclays Global Investors in San Francisco, Barclays France, Barclays Spain and the Barclays operations in Tokyo and Singapore.

As well as the induction meetings with senior management, I have met with shareholders and analysts and other stakeholders to gauge their views of Barclays and assess market opinion.

I am also Chairman of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee and I have attended meetings of both the Board Audit and Board Risk Committees during the year to observe at first hand how these Committees operate and the key issues they examine.

Marcus Agius

Barclays businesses and operations

During 2007, two off-site2008, one Board meetings were held. In March, themeeting was held off-site. The Board met atin China in September and received presentations on the New York offices ofeconomic and political outlook in China and met key Barclays Capital, where Directors were given a tour ofstaff working in the site, including the trading floor, and had the opportunityAsia-Pacific region.


154

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Group Chief Executive, John Varley, helped to meet with staff, senior management and major clients. In September, the Board met at the London office of Barclays Wealth.

launch UK National Branch Week was held in September, where over 300by visiting the Coventry High Street branch. During the course of the week, around 400 senior executives from the Group went back to the floor to find out whatexperience first hand the successes and challenges employeescolleagues in the branches are facing atfacing. Each day had a theme including raising the sharp endprofile of Barclays product range, employee benefits, the business.importance of customer service, personal development and charity fundraising. A number of Directors participated and worked alongside cashiers, personal bankers and co-ordinators for the day. To keep them informed of issues relevant

John Varley also spent time giving presentations to front line employees andcolleagues on the Group’s capital raising proposals. He kept colleagues up to date with newson how market conditions were affecting Barclays and the decisions the Board was taking in respect of the capital raising options that were available. All colleagues were invited to attend the presentations in person or via conference call and John Varley answered questions raised by colleagues from around the Group, Directors receive copies of The Globe, the magazine for employees.world.

External matters

Directors are regularly briefed on market opinion and receive copies of analyst research and press commentary. Attendance atFurther briefing material on market conditions was sent to Directors during 2008 and Directors continue to receive relevant publications to keep them up to date with changing market opinion. Directors are invited to attend results presentations analyst rehearsals and corporate governance receptions enables Directors to meet with analysts and investors to enhance their awareness of market sentiment and the views of major shareholders.sentiment.

External speakers were invited to brief the Board in 2007 on the global economic outlook. All Directors were made aware in 2007 of their responsibilities under the FSA’s Prospectus Rules in connection with the proposed merger with ABN AMRO. A number of briefings were given to the Board on the changes being introduced by the Companies Act 2006 and, in particular, the new statutory statement of Directors’ Duties, to ensure that Directors are aware of their responsibilities. Guidance was provided to management and to the Board on the desired content of supporting Board and Committee papers, to ensure that Directors are provided with sufficient information to allow them to have regard to (amongst others) the stakeholders of the Group and the long term consequences of any decisions they make.


126

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Statement on US Corporate Governance Standards

The statement required by NYSE is set out below.

Director independence

Under the NYSE Rules require the majority of the Board shouldto be independent. Under the

The Code requires at least half of the Board (excluding the Chairman) is required to be independent. The NYSE Rules contain detailed tests for determining whether a Director independence,is independent, whereas the Code requires the Board to determine whether each Director is independent in character and judgement and sets out criteria that may be relevant to that determination. We follow the Code’s recommendations as well as developing best practices among other UK public companies. Our Board annually reviews theThe independence of our non-executive Directors takingis reviewed by the Board on an annual basis and it takes into account the guidance in the Code and the criteria we have established for determining independence, which are described on page 120.pages 147 and 148.

Board Committees

We have a Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and a Board HR and Remuneration (rather than Compensation) Committee, both of which are broadly comparablesimilar in purpose and constitution to thosethe Committees required by the NYSE Rules and whose terms of reference comply with the Code’s requirements. BeyondAs the fact thatGroup Chairman was independent on appointment, the Code permits him to chair the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee is chaired by the Chairman of the Board and that the Chairman isbe a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee, both of which are permitted by the Code,Committee. Except for these appointments, both Committees are composed solely of non-executive Directors, whom the Board has determined to be independent. We follow the Code recommendation that a majority of the Nominations Committee should be independent non-executive Directors, whereas the NYSE Rules state that the Committee must be composed entirely of independent Directors. We comply with the NYSE Rules regarding the obligation to have a Board Audit Committee that meets the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act, including the requirements relating to the independence of Committee members. In April 2007,2008, we made an Annual Written Affirmation of our compliance with these requirements to the NYSE. The Code also requires us to have a Board Audit Committee comprised solely of independent non-executive Directors. WeHowever, we follow the Code recommendations, rather than the NYSE Rules however, regarding the responsibilities of the Board Audit Committee, although both are broadly comparable. We also have a Board Risk Committee, comprised of independent non-executive Directors, which considers and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE Rules require domestic US companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. There is no equivalent recommendation in the Code. TheCode but the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee has however, developed corporate governance guidelines, entitled Corporate‘Corporate Governance in Barclays,Barclays’, which have been approved and adopted by the Board.

Code of Ethics

The NYSE Rules require that domestic US companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, officers and employees. Rather than a single consolidated code as envisaged in the NYSE Rules, we have a number of ‘values based’ business conduct and ethics policies which apply to all employees. In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Group Chief Executive and senior financial officers as required by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholder approval of equity-compensation plans

The NYSE listing standards require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. We comply with UK requirements, which are similar to the NYSE standards. TheHowever, the Board however, does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition of what are considered ‘material revisions’.

Relations with Shareholders

Institutional investors

The Board’s priorities includeA key priority for the Board in 2008 was communicating with shareholders, particularly ahead of the General Meeting in November 2008, and also afterwards in order to provide further details to shareholders on the key decision points during the capital raising process. In the normal course of events, the Board aims to keep them wellshareholders up to date and informed about how the Company’s prospectsCompany is performing and its strategy, and staying abreast ofwhilst ensuring that it listens to the viewsopinions of major shareholders. To achieve this, executiveshareholders and takes their views on board. Executive Directors and senior executives hold group and one to one meetings with major investors.investors to ensure we are communicating effectively. Analyst research notes are distributed to Directors and our corporate brokers provide annualregular feedback to the Board. The Investor Relations team organise roadshows, seminars, conferences, presentations and other activities that enable the Directors to interact with investors. Prior to each AGM, theThe Group Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary haveconduct a series of meetings with the corporate governance representatives of our major institutional shareholders.shareholders ahead of each AGM. Meetings were held with our major institutional shareholders to discuss the capital raising proposals.

Private shareholders

The Board has also tried to keep private shareholders up to date with information about the capital raising proposals during 2008. In June 2008, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders regarding the Open Offer, which took place in July. Personalised forms were also sent to shareholders with a question and answer booklet to help explain the details of the Open Offer and how to complete the forms. Further documents were available on the Group’s website and sent to shareholders on request. In November, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders and Notice of General Meeting, which set out the details of the Capital Raising that required shareholder approval. A follow-up letter was also sent to shareholders to inform them of developments and to advise shareholders that all Directors would offer themselves for re-election at the 2009 AGM and that the executive Directors had all agreed to waive their bonus for 2008. An open letter to shareholders, clients, customers and colleagues from the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive was released to the London Stock Exchange on 26th January 2009 ahead of the publication of the annual results announcement on 9th February 2009.

The change in the law nowthat allows us to communicate electronically with our shareholders unless they advise us that they prefer to receive paper. We have given shareholders a choice of how to receive shareholder communications going forward and those that receive documents electronically will have access to shareholder documents as soon as they are published. These new arrangements will enablehas enabled us to use less paper, which benefits the environment and lowers distribution costs for the Group. All shareholder documents are available electronically as soon as they are published but shareholders can still receive communications in paper format if they wish. This year we will continue to post the Annual Review, Notice of Shareholder MeetingsMeeting and proxy forms to all shareholders.

We encourage shareholders to hold their shares in Barclays Sharestore, where shares are held electronically in a cost-effective and secure environment. OurShareholders can use our e-view service enables shareholders to receive their shareholder documents electronically. Itelectronically and they can also gives shareholdersuse this service to get immediate access to information relating to their personal shareholding and dividend history. ParticipantsE-view participants can also change their details and dividend mandates online and receive dividend tax vouchers electronically.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

155


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Shareholder MeetingsAnnual General Meeting/General Meeting

The 20072008 AGM was held on 26th24th April 20072008 at theThe Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. In accordance with best practice, all resolutions were considered on a poll and the results were made available on our website the same day. 54 percent52.9% of the shares in issue were voted and all resolutions were approved. All Directors are encouraged to attend the AGM and are available to answer shareholder questions. All Directors attended the 20072008 AGM, with the exception of Leigh Clifford,Dr Danie Cronjé, who as Chief Executive of Rio Tinto, was attending that company’s AGM andretiring from the Board meeting in Australia on that day. A class meeting of ordinary shareholders was also held on 24th April 2008 for shareholders to consider the resolution of the AGM that created new preference share classes. 50.5% of the shares in issue were voted and the resolution was approved by shareholders.

An extraordinaryA general meeting (EGM)(GM) was held on 14th September 2007,24th November 2008, at our head office inExCel London, where shareholders were asked to approve resolutions in connection with the proposed merger with ABN AMRO. 58 percentCapital Raising proposals. 60.8% of the shares in issue were voted on a poll and all resolutions were approved. The results of the poll were made available on our website on the same day. The Group Chairman, Senior Independent Director and a majorityall of the executive Directors and four non-executive Directors, including the Senior Independent Director, Deputy Chairman and Board Audit Committee Chairman, attended the EGM. The EGM was followed by a Class Meeting of ordinary shareholders, at which 57 percent of the ordinary shares in issue were voted on a poll and the resolution was approved.GM.

The 20082009 AGM will be held on 24th23rd April 20082009 at theThe Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. The AGM will be followed by a Class Meeting of ordinary shareholders. The Notice of Shareholder MeetingsMeeting is enclosed with this Annual Report as a separate document. The resolutions will be considered on a poll and the results will be available on our website on 24th23rd April 2008.2009.

Signed on behalf of the Board

LOGO

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

7th5th March 20082009


 

156

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 127


Corporate governanceLOGO

Remuneration reportCorporate governance

Remuneration Report

Statement from the Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee (the Committee)

Context

The disruption in the capital markets that commenced in 2007 deepened in 2008 resulting in one of the most challenging years ever for the global financial services sector. As 2008 closed it was clear that the depth of the financial crisis was so severe that a significant global economic downturn was unavoidable. The extent to which remuneration structures may have played a role in contributing to the financial crisis was still being debated and under scrutiny as this statement was written. Whatever outcomes prevail it is certain the remuneration structures will be different in the future.

As a consequence of events, the Committee commenced its deliberations for the 2008 performance year earlier than usual and met more times than is typical. The agenda rapidly developed into two work streams: first, the immediate decisions for 2008; and, second, the long-term shape of remuneration. Work continues on the latter and will extend into 2009. Our guiding principle throughout all decisions has been ‘pay for performance’.

2008

Barclays delivered profit of £6,077m, 14% lower than 2007. Although profitability, on an absolute and relative basis, compares favourably across the sector, several features of performance resulted in a more severe reduction in variable remuneration:

1.The significant under performance of the share price and the absolute reduction in market capitalisation (£20bn in 2008)

2.The decision not to pay a final dividend for 2008

3.The significantly lower absolute performance and weaker earnings in Barclays Capital

The variable pay for the Group reduced 48% relative to 2007. Accountability rests at the most senior levels and key factors relating to executive Directors include:

zero annual performance bonus for 2008

no salary increases for 2009

executive Directors who have long-term performance shares due to be released in 2009 shall agree that these be deferred for a further two years and subject to additional financial performance over that period.

the total 2009 long-term awards are 64% lower than last year, with no awards for the Chief Executive and President.

An assessment of Barclays remuneration structures and how well the calibration had worked during this stressed period shows significant alignment with shareholders:

the existing long-term performance share plan award cycles (2007/09 and 2008/10) are not expected to vest

the cumulative effect of delivering significant proportions of remuneration in Barclays shares (which are typically held on a long- term basis) has resulted in the executive Directors’ share interests decreasing in value by an aggregate of £63m in 2008, which when added to the decrease of £32m in 2007 totals £95m for the two year period

the value of employee interests in shares under Barclays employee share plans has decreased over 2007 and 2008 by approximately £2bn.

Future of Remuneration

The Committee commenced a review of remuneration during 2008. The objective of the review was to assess how the pay for performance culture and alignment with shareholders could be strengthened further. As the review advanced it became clear that the mandate ought to be extended to incorporate a broader industry wide review of remuneration. So far the Committee has:

revised the remuneration policy (see page 158) to accentuate risk management and the role of behaviours in the determination of remuneration

increased the shareholding requirements for executive Directors (from 1x to the higher of 2x times base salary or average total annual cash compensation over the prior three years)

announced a new plan in the first quarter of 2009 for approximately 15,000 employees to significantly increase the proportion of remuneration paid over multiple years.

The review is continuing and will address detailed remuneration plans and proposals which will be developed during 2009. The challenge for the industry is to use this period to develop robust remuneration structures that balance commercial enterprise with risk in the interests of all stakeholders.

Barclays will be engaged in extensive dialogue and consultation with shareholders in developing its new proposals. An update on progress will be provided at the AGM.

Report

The following report of the Committee provides further explanation of the current remuneration governance and arrangements for executive Directors and is divided into the following sections:

Committee remit, members and advisers

Remuneration policy and governance

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Non-executive Directors’ remuneration

Former Directors’ remuneration

Share plan descriptions

The Committee unanimously recommends that you vote at the 2009 AGM to approve the Remuneration Report as all Directors will be doing with their own Barclays shares.

On behalf of the Board

LOGO
Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman, Board HR and Remuneration Committee
5th March 2009

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

157


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Board HR and Remuneration Committee remit and membership

The Committee provides governance and strategic oversight of executive and all other employee remuneration, Barclays Human Resource activities and senior management development. The Committee’s terms of reference are available in the Corporate Governance section of the Barclays Investor Relations website (www.aboutbarclays.com)http://www.aboutbarclays.com.

The Committee meets a minimum of fourmet formally five times a year. Marcus Agius became a member of the Committee on 1st January 2007. Marcus Agius was considered independent (for the purposes of the Combined Code) on his appointment as Chairman of the Board. All other Committee members are independent non-executive Directors.

The Committee’s objective in relation to remuneration is to ensure that it incentivises excellence in business and personal performance and enables the Group to attract and retain employees of ability and experience.

The Committee aims to achieve this by:

ensuring clear and quantified individual and Group performance goals are in place supported by rigorous performance appraisal systems;

creating externally benchmarked remuneration frameworks for each major business that provide an evidence based approach to decisions;

reviewing past remuneration decisions against objectives; and

approving the specific remuneration packages of executive Directors and other senior executives.

The Committee’s work is supported by independent professional advice from Kepler Associates, who were re-appointed in 2007, and Towers Perrin MGMC who were appointed in 2007.

In relation to HR and senior management development, the Committee’s objective is to ensure that the Group’s people resources are managed to maximise business performance, support the long-term success and growth of the business and protect the welfare of all employees.

The Committee aims to achieve this by:

ensuring there are appropriate succession and talent management plans in place;

providing oversight of Group level policy on HR matters including those related to the mobility of employees within the Group; and

monitoring health and safety and equality and diversity issues across the Group.

Barclays employee remuneration is performance based. Important context to this report and the disclosures that follow is provided below:

Group profit before tax was £7.1bn, broadly in line with the prior year;

Group profit before business disposals increased by 3%; and

careful management of performance related remuneration has resulted in a reduction in key remuneration ratios relative to 2006, including the absorption of 2007 headcount investment.

The Committee takes seriously its commitment to clear and comprehensive disclosure. This report details the remuneration of the individual Directors who served Barclays in 2007. Barclays Remuneration Policy remains unchanged, including the commitment to transparency and to policies and programmes that serve well the interests of shareholders.

The Committee unanimously recommends that you vote to approve the report at the 2008 AGM.

Signed on behalf of the Board

LOGO

Sir Richard Broadbent

Chairman, Board HR and Remuneration Committee

7th March 2008


128

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Board HR and Remuneration Committee Members

During 2007, the Committee comprised both independent non-executive Directors andduring 2008. After each formal meeting the Chairman of the Committee presented a report to the full Board. MembershipA report on the Committee’s activities is set out on page 153 as part of the Corporate Governance Report.

The members of the Committee, was as follows:

are Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

, Marcus Agius

(Group Chairman), Leigh Clifford

and Sir John Sunderland

Sunderland.

The non-executive Directors who wereare Committee members wereare considered by the Board to be independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could materially affect the exercise of their independent judgement. The constitution and operation of the Committee complies with the Provisions on the Design of Performance Related Remuneration in the Combined Code adopted by the Financial Reporting Council.

Marcus Agius was appointed as a member of the Committee with effect from 1st January 2007.

The Chairman of the Committee presents a report of each meeting to the full Board.

Advisers to the Committee

The Committee’s work is supported by independent professional advice. The Committee has access to independent consultants to ensure that it receives independent advice. Advisers are appointed byreviews the Committee for specific work, as necessary,appointment of advisers each year. Towers Perrin MGMC and are required to disclose to the Committee any potential conflict of interest.

In 2007, Kepler Associatesawere both re-appointed by the Committee in 2008. Deloitte LLP also advised the Committee. Any potential conflicts of interest the advisers may have are disclosed to provide independent advicethe Committee. In addition to advising the Committee, members on remuneration matters. Towers Perrin MGMCawere appointed to provide advice provided remuneration benchmarking data and Deloitte LLP and its affiliates also provided remuneration benchmarking data, tax, regulatory, information technology risk, pensions , corporate finance and consulting services to the Committee in 2007, primarily in relation to the provision of remuneration for employees below Board level and in the global financial services industry.Barclays Group.

The Group Chief Executive, the Human Resources Director and, as necessary, members of the Executive Committee, also advise the Committee, supported by their teams. They are notNo employee of Barclays Group is permitted to participate in discussions or decisions of the Committee relating to their own remuneration. The Human Resources Director is responsible for providing professional support to line management in HR policy and operations and for monitoring compliance with prescribed policy and programmes across Barclays. The Human Resources Director is not a Board Director and is not appointed by the Committee.

Remuneration Policy

Barclays policy is to use remuneration to drive a high-performance culture. Executive Directors can expect outstanding remuneration if performance is outstanding and below median remuneration for below median performance. This philosophy applies to remuneration policies and practices for all employees inDuring the Group. Theyear the Committee considers remuneration levels across the Group when determining remuneration for executive Directors.

The aims ofrevised the Barclays Remuneration Policy arePolicy. The revised policy is to:

1. Attract and retain those people with the ability, experience and skill to deliver the strategy.

2. Create a direct and recognisable alignment between the rewards and risk exposure of shareholders and employees, particularly executive Directors and senior management.

3. Incentivise employees to deliver sustained performance consistent with strategic goals and appropriate risk management, and to reward success in this.

4. Deliver compensation that is affordable and appropriate in terms of value allocated to shareholders and employees.

5. Encourage behaviour consistent with the principles that guide Barclays business:

i)Winning together

 

 

incentivise excellence inDoing what is right for Barclays, its teams and balance between both short-term (one year)colleagues, to achieve collective and longer-term (three years plus) performance such that Group financial goalsindividual success.

ii)Best People

Developing talented colleagues and the goal of achieving top quartile total shareholder return (TSR) are met and sustained;differentiating compensation to reflect performance.

 

 

enable the GroupDoing what is needed to attract and retain people of proven ability, experience and skillsensure a leading position in the pools in which it competes for talent;global financial services industry.

 

iii)Customer and Client Focus

Understanding what customers and clients want and need and then serving them brilliantly.

Executive Directors’ remuneration – alignment of interests with shareholders

Figure 1 shows the aggregate total direct remuneration of the executive Directors for 2007 and 2008 (as shown in Table 1) compared to the indicative fair value movements on the executive Directors’ aggregate share based remuneration and beneficial interests in Barclays shares from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2008 (as shown in Table 7). The performance of Barclays share price has been shown for context. The chart shows that the executive Directors’ interests have decreased in value by £95m over 2007 and 2008 as a consequence of the movement in Barclays share price.

LOGO


158 

encourage behaviour consistent withBarclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

iv)Pioneering

Driving new ideas, especially those that make Barclays Guiding Principlesbwhich leads to excellenceprofitable and the appropriate balance in financial performance, governance, controls, risk management, customer service, people management, brand and reputation management;improve control.

 

 

promote attention to maximising personal contribution, contribution to the business in which the individual works and contribution to the Group overall; andImproving operational excellence.

 

 

ensure, both internallyAdding diverse skills to stimulate new perspectives and externally, that remuneration policies and programmes are transparent, well communicated, easily understood and aligned with the interests of shareholders.bold steps.

The graph below shows the value, at 31st December 2007, of £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2002 compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 100 Index. The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. The FTSE 100 Index is the index of the 100 largest UK quoted companies by market capitalisation. It is a widely recognised performance comparison for large UK companies such as Barclays and this is why it has been chosen as a comparator to illustrate Barclays TSR. The graph shows that, at the end of 2007, a hypothetical £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2002 would have generated a total return of £63, compared with a gain of £95 if invested in the FTSE 100 Index.

Remuneration for executive Directors

Remuneration for the executive Directors comprises:

v)Trusted

 

 

base salary;Acting with the highest levels of integrity to retain the trust of customers, shareholders, other external stakeholders and colleagues.

 

 

annual bonus including mandatory deferral into Barclays shares through the Executive Share Award Scheme (ESAS);Taking full responsibility for decisions and actions.

 

 

long-term incentives throughReflecting the Performance Share Plan (PSP);operation of independent, robust and evidence-based governance and control and complying with relevant legal and regulatory requirements.

The Committee keeps the remuneration policy and arrangements, as detailed in this Report, under review to ensure that Barclays programmes remain competitive and provide appropriate incentive for performance.

pension and other benefits.


Remuneration Policy Governance

Notes

aKepler Associates and Towers Perrin MGMC have given and not withdrawn their written consent to the inclusion of references to their name in the form and context in which it appears. Towers Perrin MGMC also provided remuneration benchmarking data to Barclays Group companies during the year.

bBarclays Guiding Principles were introduced during 2005 and provide all parts of the Group with a unifying set of values. They are: Winning Together, Best People, Client/Customer Focused, Pioneering and Trusted.

To ensure appropriate operation of the remuneration policy, the Committee has established frameworks for the governance of remuneration in the Global Retail and Commercial Banking and Investment Banking and Investment Management businesses and for the Group as a whole. These frameworks will be reviewed in 2009. The current frameworks set out key financial ratios

LOGOachieved by Barclays and its competitors and have been used by the Committee to inform its decision-making process when approving aggregate remuneration spend, including bonus and long-term incentive expenditure, strategic investment for new hires, and the remuneration arrangements of any employee with annual total remuneration equal to or in excess of £750,000.

Schedule 7A ofFor all individual remuneration decisions made by the Companies Act 1985 requires thatCommittee, including those for executive Directors, the graph shows TSR for the five years ending with the relevant financial year.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

129


Corporate governance

Remuneration report

The Committee reviews the elementseach element of remuneration relative to the policies stated in this reportperformance and to the practice of other comparable organisations. Remuneration is benchmarked against the markets in which we compete for talent. This includes benchmarking against other leading international banks and financial services organisations, and other companies of similar size to Barclays in the FTSE 100 Index.

The component parts for each executive Director are detailed inGiven the tables accompanying this report.

Themateriality of Barclays pension arrangements, the Committee guideline that executive Directors should hold, as a minimum, the equivalent of one times their base salary in Barclays shares, including shares held under award through ESAS, was met by all executive Directors.

Each element of remuneration is important and hasoperates a specific roleframework for the management of pensions to ensure proper oversight. The Global Retirement Fund Governance Framework is operated to ensure best practice in achieving the aimsrespect of regulatory compliance, governance, investment and administration. Details of the remuneration policy. The combined potential remuneration from bonus and PSP outweighs the other elements, and is subject to personal and Group performance, thereby placing the majority of total remuneration at risk.

Of the key elements of remuneration (salary, annual performance bonus, ESAS and PSP), salary made up a maximum of 30% of the 2007 remunerationpension arrangements in place for executive Directors are set out on page 164 and 1.4%for other employees on page 160.

As required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A of the Companies Act 1985, the Group’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have audited the information contained in respectTables 1b, 3, 5, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 on pages 162 to 168.

Total Shareholder Return

Figure 2 shows the value, at 31st December 2008, of Robert E Diamond Jr’s arrangements, which reflects general practice£100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 compared with the value of £100 invested in the investment bankingFTSE 100 Index. The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. The FTSE 100 Index is a widely recognised performance comparison for large UK companies and investment management industry.this is why it has been chosen as a comparator to illustrate Barclays TSR. The remaining proportiongraph shows that, at the end of 2008, a hypothetical £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 would have generated a total loss of £59, compared with a gain of £18 if invested in the key compensation elements for executive Directors is at risk. The relative weighting summarised in this paragraph does not include pension and benefits.FTSE 100 Index.

The

LOGO


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

159


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Executive Director’s Pay

Table 1 explains the purpose of each element of remuneration and shows executive Directors’ remuneration for 2008 and 2007.

Base Salaries

The executive Directors is summarisedwill receive no base salary increase in the table below and discussed in greater detail in the sections that follow.2009.

 

Remuneration elementTable 2: Base salary

    Base salary at
31st Dec 2008
£000
  Base salary at
1st April 2009
£000
  Date of
previous
increase
Executive Directors         

John Varley

  1,100  1,100  1st April 2008

Robert E Diamond Jr

  250  250  1st March 1999

Chris Lucas

  650  650  1st April 2008

Frits Seegers

  700  700  n/a

Table 1a: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

Element Purpose Delivery Programme detailsummaryWhen normally received/
awarded
Base salarySalary To reflect the market value of the individual and their role 

–   Cash

–   Monthly

–   Pensionable

 

–   Reviewed annually, with changesany increases typically effective on 1st April

Paid in year
Annual performancebonus and ESAS(cash) To incentivise the delivery of annual goals at the Group, business division and individual levels 

–   TypicallyNo more than 75% of annual performance bonus paid in casha

–   TypicallyAt least 25% recommended as deferred

    Barclays shares share awards under

ESAS

–       Annual

–   Non-pensionable

 

–   Based on annual business unit performance, performance of the Group as a whole and leadershipindividual contribution

Normally paid in the following financial year
PSPbTotal cashSub-total of the above
Deferred share award (ESAS)To align annual performance with shareholder value and increase retention

–   At least 25% of annual performance bonus recommended as deferred share awards under ESAS

–   Non-pensionable

–   Discretionary awards of shares to be deferred for three to five years. No performance condition on release, as a deferred share award

–   20% bonus shares releasable after three years, a further 10% after five years

–   Dividends normally accumulated during deferral period

Normally awarded in the following financial year
Long-term incentive (PSP) To reward the creation of above median, sustained growth in shareholder value and Economic Profit (EP) performance 

–   Free shares subject to

    a performance
    condition

–       Annual awards of shares that

vest after three years, subject to performance conditions

–   Non-pensionable

 

–   Discretionary awards

–   Participation reviewed annually

–   Barclays performance over three years determines the number of performance shares eligible for release to each individual

–       For awards made

Normally awarded in 2007, and awards to be made in 2008, EP threshold, thereafter 50% under a TSR performance condition and 50% under an EP performance condition

the following financial year
Total direct remunerationTotal of the above
Pensionc (or cash allowance) To provide a market competitive post-retirement benefit 

–   Deferred cash or cash allowance

–   Monthly

 

–   Non-contributory, defined benefit scheme and/or defined contribution scheme, or cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions

Paid or accrued during year
Other benefitsTo provide market competitive benefits

–   Benefit in kind, or cash allowance

–   Non-pensionable

–   Benefits include private medical, insurance life and disability cover, accommodation overseas when required for business purposes, use of company owned vehicle or cash equivalent and tax advice

Received during year
Sub-total in accordance with Companies Act 1985Total of Salary, Annual Cash Bonus, Other Benefits and Pension Cash Allowance

160

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Annual Cash Bonus and Deferred Share Awards

No annual cash bonuses or deferred share awards have been awarded to executive Directors for 2008. The maximum bonus opportunity for executive Directors is normally 250%, but is tailored to the relevant market.

Long-term incentives

PSP Vesting in 2008

The PSP awards made in 2005, due for release in March 2008 lapsed in full as the performance condition was not met.

As disclosed in the 2007 Report and Accounts, in March 2008 Robert E Diamond Jr received a cash payment of £7.425m and an award of shares deferred for one year under ESAS of £7.425m, detailed on pages 162 to 163 from the Retained Incentive Opportunity 2005-2007 in which he participated.

PSP awards due to vest in 2009

For the PSP awards made in relation to the 2006-2008 cycle, the TSR condition was not met and the EP condition was partially met. As a result, awards that are scheduled to vest in March 2009 (at the absolute discretion of the PSP trustee) are due to vest at 1.4 75 times the initial award (maximum is 3 times). This represents approximately 9% of the maximum value of the number of shares that could vest at the share price at award.

After consultation with the Remuneration Committee, the executive Directors intend to write to the PSP trustee to request that it defers the exercise of its discretion to re lease shares to them under the 2006-2008 awards for a further two year period. At the end of that period it is intended that the PSP trustee considers the re lease of the shares, subject to continued employment and a financial performance condition to be agreed and assessed by the Committee.

The maximum number of shares re leasable at the end of the two year period will be 1.475 times the initial award; there will be no opportunity to receive shares in excess of this number (except for any dividend shares that may be awarded at the PSP trustee’s discretion).

Proposed awards in 2009

It is proposed that Chris Lucas and Frits Seegers are awarded a performance share plan award in 2009.

The number of shares awarded to date and the performance conditions relating to each award are set out on pages 162 and 163.

The PSP awards are shown in Table 1b at the fair value of the re commended awards.


 

 

Table 1b: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

    John Varley  Robert E Diamond Jr  Chris Lucas  Frits Seegers
   

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

                

Salary

  1,075  975  250  250  638  450  700  700

Annual performance bonus (cash)

  0  1,425  0  6,500  0  450  0  1,313

Total cash

  1,075  2,400  250  6,750  638  900  700  2,013

Deferred share award (ESAS)

  0  618  0  11,375  0  195  0  569

Fair value of long- term incentive (PSP) award

  0  1,200  0  3,000  800  800  1,600  1,600

Total direct remuneration

  1,075  4,218  250  21,125  1,438  1,895  2,300  4,182

Pension (or cash allowance)

  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  159  113  175  175

Other benefits

  23  18  66  14  18  22  27  24

Sub-total in accordance with Companies Act 1985

  1,098  2,418  316  6,764  815  1,035  902  2,212

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

161


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Share Plans

Barclays operates a number of share plans to align the interests of executive Directors with shareholders. The following tables summarise the interests of each executive Director in each plan and the relevant performance conditions for outstanding PSP cycles. The interests shown are the maximum number of shares that may be received under each plan. Executive Directors do not pay for any share plan award.

During 2008, the number of shares under each award or option has been increased in accordance with the rules by 2.68% and option exercise prices per share have been correspondingly reduced to reflect the impact of the capital raising in July. No other adjustments were made for capital raisings during the year.

Summary descriptions of principal share plans operated by Barclays are shown on pages 169-172.


 

 

 

Table 3: Long-term plans and deferred share plans                
    Number of
shares under
award/option
1st January 2008
(maximum)
  Awarded in
year (maximum)
  Market
price on
award date
  Adjusted
weighted
average
exercise price
  Number
released/
exercised
 

John Varley

          

PSP 2005-2007

  426,135    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  461,244    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  491,130    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    791,208  £4.25      

ISOP

  920,000       £4.29   

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  344,711  135,715  £4.25     (23,214)

Robert E Diamond Jr

          

PSP 2005-2007

  156,249    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  2,306,208    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  2,803,548    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,978,020  £4.25      

ISOP

  560,000       £4.42   

ESOS

  100,000       £3.97   

RIO cash release

             

BGI EOP

  100,000       £20.11   

ESAS

  4,863,749  4,131,868  £4.25     (2,131,463)

Chris Lucas

          

PSP 2007-2009

  248,730    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    527,472  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  69,091  42,857  £4.25     (34,546)

Frits Seegers

          

PSP 2006-2008

  473,184    £6.30      

PSP 2007-2009

  409,278    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,054,944  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,390       £4.70   

ESAS

  231,383  125,000  £4.25     (80,221)

Changes to Group ChairmanNumbers shown for ESAS above represent provisional allocations that have been awarded. Numbers shown as aggregate ESAS amounts also include shares under option as at 31st December 2008. Nil cost options are normally granted under mandatory ESAS awards at the third anniversary of grant and executive Directors

Marcus Agius was appointed Group Chairman with effect from 1st January 2007.

Marcus Agius receives a feeare exercisable (over initial allocation and two-thirds of £750,000 (inclusive of Director’s fees). He is also eligiblebonus shares) typically for private health insurance.two years. The minimum time commitment is equivalent to 60%aggregate exercise price of a full time role. Marcus Agiusnil cost option is not eligible to participate in Barclays bonus and share incentive plans, nor will he participate in Barclays pension plans or receive any pension contributions. The letter of appointment provides for a notice period of 12 months from Barclays and six months from Marcus Agius.

Naguib Kheraj ceased to be an executive Director on 31st March 2007. Naguib Kheraj was succeeded by Chris Lucas, who was appointed to the position of Group Finance Director with effect from 1st April 2007. The key terms of executive Directors’ service contracts are£1 (further detail is included on page 133.169). At the fifth anniversary of the provisional allocation

 

Base Salarythe nil cost options normally lapse and the shares under provisional allocation (including bonus shares) are released at the discretion of the ESAS trustee. In 2008, nil cost options were granted to Mr Varley over 91,213 shares. Nil cost options (granted in 2003) lapsed during the year. Mr Varley held 63,447 nil cost options under ESAS as at 1st January 2008, and 146,282 as at 31st December 2008. The first and last exercise dates were 13th March 2006 and 7th March 2010 respectively.


The annual base salaries for the current executive Directors are shown in the table below:

 

As atTable 4: Performance conditions attaching to the share plans in which the executive Directors participate

31st Dec 2007

As at
1st April 2008
Date of
previous
increase

John Varley

£1,000,000£1,100,0001st Apr 2007

Robert E Diamond Jr

£250,000£250,0001st Mar 1999

Gary Hoffman

£625,000£625,0001st Apr 2006

Frits Seegers

£700,000£700,000n/a

Chris Lucas

£600,000£650,000n/a

In respect of John Varley and Chris Lucas, having regard to the levels of salary and total compensation in comparable organisations, the Committee approved an increase to base salary effective from 1st April 2008.


Notes

aEligible executives may request that all or part of the cash bonus to which they would otherwise become entitled, be granted in the form of an additional award under ESAS or as a pension contribution by way of Special Company Contribution (Bonus Sacrifice). For 2007 Robert E Diamond Jr received 43% of his annual bonus in cash and 57% as a recommendation for an award of Barclays shares under Mandatory ESAS.

bPlease refer to Note 44 to the accounts for further information on PSP.

cPlease refer to Note 30 to the accounts for further information on the Group’s pension plans.

130Scheme

  

BarclaysPerformance

Annual Report 2007period

Performance

measure

Target

  


LOGO

Annual Bonus and ESAS

The maximum bonus opportunity for executive Directors is tailored to the relevant market; this is typically 250% of base salary. The annual bonus is based on a qualitative and quantitative assessment of performance (including EP and PBT results) with the quantitative assessment comprising the majority. EP and PBT are considered to be good measures of value creation for shareholders.

ESAS is a deferred share award plan which operates in conjunction with the annual Barclays Group cash bonus plans (and various other cash long-term incentive plans operated by Barclays Group companies). Currently, for executive Directors, typically 75% of the annual bonus is delivered as cash. A recommendation may be made to the ESAS trustee that the remaining 25% is delivered as an award under ESAS (‘Mandatory ESAS award’).

In addition, executive Directors may request that any cash bonus, to which they may have otherwise become entitled, be granted as an additional award under ESAS (‘Voluntary ESAS award’).

Both Mandatory and Voluntary ESAS awards will normally include additional shares called bonus shares with a value of up to 30% of the bonus amount awarded in shares. The ESAS trustee may apply dividends it receives on shares held in trust in purchasing additional Barclays shares which may also be released to participants.

A Mandatory ESAS award is a provisional allocation of Barclays shares which does not give rise to any right or interest in those shares. Normally, under a Mandatory ESAS award, the ESAS trustee grants participants the right to call for the shares plus two-thirds of any bonus shares, in the form of a nil-cost option following the third anniversary of the award date. If this right is not exercised, the ESAS trustee may, following the fifth anniversary, release all the Barclays shares including all bonus shares and dividend shares to the participant.

Awards under Voluntary ESAS are granted in the form of a nil-cost option which is a right to acquire Barclays shares which will become fully exercisable after five years.

Neither the exercise of nil-cost options granted under Mandatory or Voluntary ESAS nor the release of Barclays shares under award is subject to performance conditions. As ESAS is a deferred share award plan, it would not be appropriate to attach a performance condition to options or awards.

If an executive ceases to be employed he may forfeit his award depending on why he leaves.

PSP

The PSP was approved by shareholders at the 2005 AGM and replaced the ISOP as the main performance linked share incentive plan. PSP awards to date have been granted in the form of provisional allocations of Barclays shares which do not give a participant any right to acquire, or an interest in, shares until such time as the PSP trustee decides to release the shares to the participant (i.e. when the PSP awards vest). Participants do not pay to receive an award or to receive a release of shares. Performance share awards are communicated to participants as an initial allocation. Normally, the maximum expected value of an award at the date of grant will be the higher of 150% of base salary or 75% of base salary and target bonus. ‘Expected value’ is a single value for the award at grant which takes account of the various possible performance and vesting outcomes, although it is Barclays performance over a three-year period which determines the final number of shares that may be released to participants. Dividend shares may also be released in respect of the vested shares.

Awards normally vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, if and to the extent that the performance conditions are satisfied. Note that:

 

relative TSR and EP are both considered to be good measures of value creation to shareholders;

PSP

  

before any shares are2008 -2010

50% of award calibrated against TSR33% of maximum award released Barclays cumulativefor above median performance (6th place) with 100% released in 1st place and a scaled basis in between
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period must normally be greater than the total for the previous three-year period;

  

33% of maximum award released for PSP awards made in 2005, the£6,921m scaled to 100% of maximum award depended on Barclays TSR relative to a peer group of 11 other international banks. These awards are due to lapse in 2008 as the TSR performance condition was not satisfied;

at £8,350m

  

the performance conditions for PSP awards made in 2006 and 2007 will be measured2007-2009

50% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three-yearthree year performance period (2006 to 2008 and 2007 to 2009 respectively);

  

33% of maximum award released for PSP awards made in 2006 and 2007, 50%£7,618m scaled to 100% of themaximum award depends on Barclays EP and 50% of the award depends on Barclays TSR relative to a peer group of 11 other international banks;

at £8,668m

  

2006-2008

50% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period33% of maximum award released for awards made in 2005, 2006 and 2007 in relation£5,661m scaled to the100% of maximum award at £7,073m
2005-2007100% of award calibrated against TSR element of the award, there is no vesting unless Barclays is rankedAs above median on relative TSR.

The peer group for the TSR element of the 2007 award, as for the 2006 award, isa:

 

162

UKBarclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

For PSP, at the end of each performance period, independent confirmation is provided to the Committee of the extent to which each performance condition has been met. Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and Cumulative Economic Profit (EP) were selected in 2005 as performance measures to support the Group’s long-term goals.

All awards and releases are recommended by the Committee and are subject to trustee discretion.

The trustees may also release dividend shares to participants which represent accumulated dividends (net of withholding) in respect of shares under award.

During 2008 Barclays highest share price was £5.06 and the lowest was £1.27. The share price at year end was £1.53.


Cash

released

  

Market price
on release/
exercise date

  Number
lapsed in
2008
  Adjustment
due to
open offer
  Adjusted
number of
shares under
award/option at
31st December
2008
(maximum)
  Vested
number
of shares
under option
  Value of
release/
exercise
  End of three
year PSP
performance
period, or first
exercise/
scheduled
release date
  Last
exercise/
scheduled
release date

     (426,135)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       12,360  473,604       31/12/08  21/03/09

       13,164  504,294       31/12/09  22/03/10

       21,204  812,412       31/12/10  20/03/11

       24,655  944,655  944,655     18/05/03  22/03/14

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.56    12,255  469,467    £0.1m  13/03/06  20/03/13

     (156,249)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       61,806  2,368,014       31/12/08  21/03/09

       75,138  2,878,686       31/12/09  22/03/10

       53,010  2,031,030  ��    31/12/10  20/03/11

       15,008  575,008  575,008     12/03/04  22/03/14

     (100,000)          14/08/01  13/08/08

£7.425m

             £7.42m  06/02/08  15/03/08

         100,000  100,000     26/03/07  26/03/14

  £4.56/£4.57    183,958  7,048,112    £9.74m  28/02/06  20/03/13

       6,666  255,396       31/12/09  22/03/10

       14,136  541,608       31/12/10  20/03/11

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.45    2,075  79,477    £0.16m  31/03/08  20/03/13

       12,684  485,868       31/12/08  04/08/09

       10,968  420,246       31/12/09  22/03/10

       28,272  1,083,216       31/12/10  20/03/11

       90  3,480       01/11/12  01/05/13

  £2.91    9,550  285,712    £0.23m  29/06/07  20/03/13

Mr Diamond’s Retained Incentive Opportunity (RIO) reached the end of its performance period on 31st December 2007. Vesting was based on Barclays Capital’s cumulative EP over the three-year performance period (which exceeded the £2bn threshold at which the maximum potential value would vest). This value of the RIO award was awarded 50% in cash and 50% in shares, deferred for one year under ESAS. The ESAS number shown as awarded in the year to

Mr Diamond includes the deferred share element of his Retained Incentive Opportunity (1,631,868 shares). No bonus shares are attributable to this award. The cash release made in the year is also shown in the table above.

Mr Varley and Mr Diamond received 6,047 and 172,264 dividend shares respectively from the ESAS released during the year (share price on release date was £4.56).


TSR Peer group constituents

  Mainland Europe  
UKMainland EuropeUSUnderpin

Actual

performance

HBOS,

Banco SantanderbCitigroup

HSBC,

BBVAJP Morgan Chase

Lloyds TSB,

BNP Paribas

Royal Bank of Scotland

  

Banco Santander,

BBVA, BNP Paribas,

Deutsche Bank, UBS

  Citigroup,

JP Morgan

Chase

Cumulative EP over performance period must exceed cumulative EP over previous three years

To be determined at vesting in

March 2011

As above

As aboveTo be determined

at vesting in

March 2010

As above

As abovePerformance condition
   UBSpartially met

   

The performance scales for the TSR and EP elements of the 2007 award are as shown in the two charts below:


LOGO

Notes

a

As above

The reserve companies for the 2006 and 2007 awards are UniCredit, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Wachovia.

bThe Committee has approved the substitution of Banco Santander for ABN AMRO in the TSR peer group for awards granted under the PSP in 2005, 2006 and 2007, in
As above  

accordance with the Committee’s agreed peer group adjustment principles. This adjustment was made in anticipation of the takeover of ABN AMRO. Following a review of the peer group reserve banks, it was decided that Banco Santander was the most suitable substitute based on both competitive position relative to Barclays and similarity to ABN AMRO.TSR performance

condition not met


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 131
 163


Corporate governance

Remuneration reportReport

 

EP comprises profit after taxPensions

Chris Lucas and minority interests lessFrits Seegers receive a capital charge.cash allowance of 25% of salary in lieu of joining a Group pension scheme.

Independent confirmation is provided to the Committee as to whether a performance condition has been met.

Each year a review of the Group’s share-based long-term incentives (currently the PSP) is undertaken to check that the structure and performance conditions remain appropriate in respect of the Group’s business objectives and best market practice. The 2007 review included consideration of eligibility criteria. The outcome of the review was that participation in the PSP should be restricted to executive Directors, members of the Executive Committee, Executive Committee direct reports and other key senior positions. Developing a link to Barclays share price is important and therefore, as individuals below these levels become more highly remunerated, some of their remuneration may be delivered as an award of Barclays shares (to be known as Incentive Shares). Participants would not be eligible for a release of shares until the third anniversary and the release of Incentive Shares would not be subject to performance conditions. It is intended that a new employee share plan will be established under which Incentive Shares will be granted. No Board Directors will be eligible to participate in this plan and awards will be settled using only existing Barclays shares.

ISOP

ISOP (Incentive Share Option Plan) has not been used for awards to executive Directors since 2004. Details of ISOP awards held by executive Directors can be found on page 141. Awards in 2003 and 2004 under ISOP include financial metrics or thresholds which were adjusted where necessary to neutralise the effect of the introduction of IFRS.

The main performance condition was TSR relative to a peer group of 11 other major international banks, combined with an EP threshold. Awards have now vested, as set out in the table on page 141.

Retained Incentive Opportunity

Robert E Diamond Jr received an award in February 2008 under the Retained Incentive Opportunity. This award was subject to performance criteria based on the delivery of EP at Barclays Capital over the period 2005 to 2007. The performance measure applied was cumulative EP performance of Barclays Capital during the period 1st January 2005 to 31st December 2007. In order to achieve the maximum value award under the Retained Incentive Opportunity, Barclays Capital had to successfully generate a cumulative EP of £2bn over the performance period. EP was chosen as this is an appropriate measure to align the interests of the participant with those of shareholders andJohn Varley is a good measuremember of value creation for shareholders.

Details of the award which was made to Robert E Diamond Jr are on page 139.

Sharesave

All eligible employees including executive Directors may participate in Sharesave. Sharesave is an HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) approved all-employee share option plan. HMRC does not permit performance conditions to be attached to the exercise of Sharesave options. Under Sharesave, participants are granted options over Barclays shares. Each participant may save up to £250 per month to purchase Barclays shares at a discount. For the 2007 grant, the discount was 20% of the market value of a share at the time the option was granted. Sharesave is also offered to employees in Spain and Ireland. Following the 2007 invitation, a total of 40,621 employees in the UK, Spain and Ireland were participants in Sharesave with 72.4 million shares under option. Details of options held by executive Directors are on page 140.

Sharepurchase

Sharepurchase was introduced in January 2002. It is an HMRC approved all-employee share plan. Sharepurchase is open to all eligible employees including executive Directors. Under Sharepurchase, participants are able to purchase up to £1,500 worth of Barclays shares each year, which, if kept in trust for five years, can be withdrawn from Sharepurchase tax-free. Any shares in Sharepurchase will earn dividends in the form of additional shares, which must normally be held by the trustee on behalf of the participant for no less than three years.

To encourage employee ownership of Barclays shares, Barclays matches, share for share, up to the first £600 each participant invests in Sharepurchase in each tax year. Matching shares must normally be held by the trustee on behalf of the participant for no less than three years.

At 31st December 2007, 23,097 employees were participants in Sharepurchase, with a total of 12.9 million shares held on their behalf by the Sharepurchase trustee.

Dilution Limits

The outstanding awards under ISOP and Sharesave are intended to be satisfied by the issue of new Barclays shares or through treasury shares within the limits agreed by shareholders when these plans were approved. These limits comply with the Association of British Insurers’ guidelines restricting dilution from employee share plans. The overall limits under the guidelines are that no more than 10% of a company’s issued share capital may be used in any ten-year period. Up to 5% may be used for executive share plans. Shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited issued as a result of option exercises under the BGI EOP also count towards these limits. As at 31st December 2007, Barclays headroom under these limits, i.e. the amount remaining available for issue, was 4.2% and 1.5% respectively.

Employees’ Benefit Trusts (EBTs)

The trustees of the Barclays EBTs grant awards under ESAS and PSP over existing Barclays shares which they have purchased in the market. The trustees of the Barclays EBTs have informed the Bank that their normal policy is to abstain from voting in respect of the Barclays shares held in trust.

The trustees of the Sharepurchase EBT may vote in respect of Barclays shares held in the Sharepurchase EBT, but only at the direction of the participants. The trustees will not otherwise vote in respect of shares held in the Sharepurchase EBT.

Pensions

All Group pension arrangements are managed in accordance with the Global Retirement Fund Governance Framework to ensure best practice in respect of regulatory compliance, governance, investment and administration. The framework is overseen by the Committee.

Pension benefits for executive Directors are provided through defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans, unfunded unapproved retirement benefit arrangements, cash or a combination of these. The pension benefit applicable will depend on the date an executive Director was appointed and their individual situation. Annual performance related bonuses are not included in pensionable salary.

The Group’s closed UK defined benefit pension scheme. This non-contributory arrangement provides a pension benefit of which John Varley and Gary Hoffman are members, is a non-contributory scheme. Benefits are provided on leaving servicetwo thirds of his pensionable salary at the normal retirement age of 60. Should he retire at 55, an unreduced pension age (60) by reference to the executive Director’s length of service, normally by reference to 1/60th60% of pensionable salary for each year of pensionable service (John Varley’s pension accrual is provided through the scheme in accordance with his service contract as set out in the noteswould be provided. There were no changes to the pensions table on page 136).

pension arrangements for Mr Varley during the year. His increase in pension of £83,000 during the year relates to accrual under the scheme. The Group’s closed UK defined benefit pension arrangementscheme also provides, that,whilst in the event ofemployment, a death before retirement, a cash lump sum of up to four times salary is paid together with ain service dependant’s pension of 50% of the pension that would have been payable if employment had the member remained in active servicecontinued until their normal pension age. For deathMr Varley also has a defined contribution benefit of £549,816 as at 31st December 2008 in retirement,respect of a dependant’s pension is payable of approximately 50% ofprevious transfer from a freestanding AVC.

Robert E Diamond Jr participates in the member’s pension at the date of death, not taking into account commutation of any cash lump sum at the time of the member’s retirement. If a member is granted a deferred pension that has not yet come into payment, the widow/widower receives a pension of 50% of the deferred pension payable. Where applicable, children’s pensions are payable, usually up to the age of 18. Enhanced benefits may be payable if it is determined that a member is unable to work as a result of serious ill-health.

The Group’s US non-contributory defined benefit arrangement, ofarrangements which Robert E Diamond Jr is a member, providesprovide a benefit at age 65 of 1/60th of final average pensionable pay plus 0.3% of final average pensionable pay in excess of the US Internal Revenue Service’s covered compensation limit


132

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

for each year of pensionable service (upup to a maximum of 30 years).years. In line with current market practice, final average pensionable pay in the US includes salary and an element of bonus subjectup to overalla current combined maximum of US$350,000. The benefits are provided through the US defined benefit plan limits. In(a funded arrangement), and the event ofUS Restoration Plan (an unfunded arrangement). The scheme also provides a member’s death before retirement, ain service spouse’s pension of approximately 50% of the member’s pension that would have been payable had the member taken early retirement occurred on the date of death, is payable. On death after retirement, a spouse’s pension of 50% of the pension in payment is payable. In addition, enhanced benefits are payable if the member qualifies for disability benefits.death.

The US Restoration Plan, of which Robert EMr Diamond Jr is also a member, is an unfunded unapproved arrangement which restores reductions in the benefits provided through the approved US plan resulting from the application of relevant compensation and benefit limitations under the US Internal Revenue Code. Robert E Diamond Jr participates in this plan on similar terms to other Barclays senior executives participating in US benefit plans.

Robert E Diamond Jr also participates in the Barclays Bank PLC 401K Thrift Savings Plan and Thrift Restoration Plan, which are both defined contribution plans. The company contributions in 2008 amounted to £11,745 (US$21,859).

Table 5 sets out the pension benefits of the executive Directors.

Pension accrued during the year represents the change in accrued pension during the year (including inflation at the prescribed rate of 5% (U K)). Pensions paid from the UK final salary section of the applicable

fund are reviewed annually and increase by a minimum of the increase in the retail prices index (capped at 5%), subject to the scheme rules.

The transfer values have been calculated in a manner consistent with the Retirement Benefit Scheme – Transfer Values (GN11) published by the Institute of Actuaries, and the Faculty of Actuaries. During 2008, the independent UK Retirement Fund Trustee changed the transfer value basis for all members. The change reflected different mortality assumptions and a lower discount rate. This contributed £1.4m of the increase in transfer value of John Varley’s pension during the year.

Other benefits

Executive Directors are provided with benefits including private medical insurance, life and disability cover, the use of a company-owned vehicle or the cash equivalent, tax advice and accommodation overseas when required for business purposes. These benefits are available on similar terms to othereach executive Director. No Director has an expense allowance.

Shareholding guideline

The Committee guideline that executive Directors should hold, as a minimum, the equivalent of one times their base salary in Barclays senior executivesshares, including shares awarded under ESAS, was met by all executive Directors at 31st December 2007. During the year the Committee increased this guideline to the higher of two times salary or one-third of total remuneration for the last three years. Executive Directors have five years from their appointment to meet this guideline and a reasonable period to build up to the guideline again, if it is not met because of a share price fall. Table 6 shows the executive Directors’ shareholdings. Table 7 shows the indicative change in value of the US.executive Directors’ total share interests during 2008.


Where appropriate, cash allowances are provided

Table 5: Pension provision

 

   

Age at 31st

December
2008

 Completed
years of
service
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st
December
2007

£000

 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(including
increase for
inflation)
£000
 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(excluding
inflation)
£000
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 

Transfer

value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2007

£000

 

Transfer
value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 Increase
in transfer
value during
the year
£000
 Annual cash
in lieu of
pension
£000

John Varley

 52 26 489 83 59 572 9,463 12,328 2,865 

Robert E Diamon Jr

 57 12 38 7 5 45 214 280 66 

Chris Lucas

 48 1        159

Frits Seegers

 50 2     

   175

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
Executive Directors        
John Varley  470,650    593,266  

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

 
    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008 
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
 
Robert E Diamond Jr  3,402,192    5,866,965   
Chris Lucas  38,003    76,038   
Frits Seegers  699,870    897,747   

Table 7: Indicative change in value of executive Director

total share interests

 
    

Indicative
value at
1st January
2008

£m

  Change in
holdings
£m
  

Indicative
value at
31st December
2008

£m

  

Indicative
decrease
on total share
interest

2008

£m

 
Executive Directors        
John Varley  7.1  1.4  2.5  (6.0)
Robert E Diamond Jr  50.9  22.3  23.5  (49.7)
Chris Lucas  1.0  1.0  0.7  (1.3)
Frits Seegers  6.2  2.6  2.8  (6.0)

Beneficial interests include shares held either directly, or through a nominee, their spouse, and children under 18. They include any interests held through Sharepurchase. Non-beneficial interests include any

interests in shares where the executive Director holds the legal, but not beneficial interest. In addition to the shares above Mr Diamond also holds 200,000 shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited. Mr Seegers has granted a third party bank security over 896,346 of the ordinary shares he holds. Mr Seegers retains beneficial ownership of these shares. He also holds 1,000 ordinary shares in Absa Group Limited. Note 45 provides further information on Directors and officers shareholdings. There were no changes to the interests of executive Directors in lieushares of being ableBarclays PLC in the period 31st December 2008 to join27th February 2009.

Share interests are beneficial interests plus share plan interests including any initial or provisional allocations and vested awards under ESAS, PSP, ISOP, ESOS and Sharesave.


164

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Performance Linked Remuneration

Each element of remuneration is important and has a Group pension arrangement. Chris Lucas, Naguib Kheraj and Frits Seegers received such cash allowancesspecific role in 2007.

Inachieving the event that an executive Director builds up pension benefits close to, or in excessaims of the HMRC Lifetime Allowance,remuneration policy. The combined potential remuneration from annual performance bonus and PSP outweighs the executive Directorother elements, and is eligiblesubject to opt for a cash allowance insteadpersonal and Group performance, thereby placing the majority of continued pension accrual. The allowance given is no more thanpotential remuneration at risk.

Table 8 shows the costaverage proportions of fundingfixed and variable pay over the existing pension benefit.last three years.

Table 8: Variable remuneration average over the last three years

(or since joining)

 

 

        Variable 
    Fixed  Cash  Shares 

Executive Directors

    

John Varley

  57% 19% 24%

Robert E Diamond Jr

  2% 39% 59%

Chris Lucas

  38% 12% 49%

Frits Seegers

  22% 25% 53%

Service ContractsNon-executive Directors

David Booth

I7224

Sir Richard Broadbent (Senior Independent Director)

I721524

Leigh Clifford

I7134

Fulvio Conti

I7179

Dr Danie Cronjé (left the Board 24th April 2008)

I21

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

I72110

Sir Andrew Likierman

I71884

Sir Michael Rake

I6217

Sir Nigel Rudd (Deputy Chairman)

I7202

Stephen Russell

I6131023

Sir John Sunderland

I72041

Patience Wheatcroft

I722

Key

OAIndependent on appointment
EDExecutive Director
IIndependent non-executive Director

Board Committees

Certain responsibilities of the Board are delegated to Board Committees to assist the Board in carrying out its functions and to ensure independent oversight of internal control and risk management. Membership of Board Committees is recommended to the Board by the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, which reviews Committee composition and balance regularly to ensure the Committees are refreshed. All members of principal Board Committees are non-executive Directors, although the Chairman is a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. Each Board Committee’s terms of reference set out the specific matters for which delegated authority has been given. These terms of reference, which are available on our website, are reviewed annually.

The Board has delegated authority to four principal Board Committees:

Board Audit Committee

Board Risk Committee

Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

The number of meetings held and attendance at the Committee meetings is set out above in ‘Board and Committee Membership and Attendance’. The activities of the Board Committees are set out on the pages 149 to 154.

The terms of reference for each of the principal Board Committees are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

Board Audit Committee

Stephen Russell (Chairman)

Fulvio Conti

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

Sir Andrew Likierman

Sir Michael Rake

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Audit Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

In addition to the members of the Committee, there are a number of regular attendees at each meeting. The Group Chief Executive, Group Finance Director, Barclays Internal Audit Director, Group Risk Director, Group General Counsel and the lead external audit partner normally attend all scheduled Board Audit Committees. The Board Audit Committee members usually meet privately before each meeting to raise any concerns with the Chairman of the meeting and they also meet with the external auditors and the Barclays Internal Audit Director, without management present, at the end of most Committee meetings. Sir Andrew Likierman continues to fulfil his role as the ‘financial expert’ as defined by the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, as a result of his accountancy background and his career with HM Treasury, has ‘recent and relevant financial experience’ as recommended by the Code. Sir Michael Rake will succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Committee in March 2009. Sir Michael has significant audit experience having worked at KPMG from 1972-2007 where he was Chairman of KPMG International from 2002-2007.


Barclays

TheAnnual Report 2008

149


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Activities in 2008

Figure 5 illustrates how the Committee allocated its time in 2008. During 2008, the Committee:

considered the information it would require during the coming year to enable it to discharge its responsibilities;

considered the significant changes in financial markets and economic conditions and the impact on the areas of focus for the Committee;

reviewed the Annual Report and Accounts and half-year Results and Interim Management Statements;

reviewed in detail the valuations of Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures, reviewing mark-to-market valuations and accounting for derivatives and assessing the overall quality of earnings;

reviewed the Group’s accounting policies and, in particular, the accounting for leveraged loans;

considered control issues of Group has service contracts with its executive Directors. The effective dateslevel significance for different areas of the contracts forbusiness;

received reports on the executive Directors who served during 2007 are showncontrol environment in each of the table below. The service contracts do not have a fixed term but provide for a notice period fromfollowing businesses or functions: Barclays Wealth, Barclays Commercial Bank, Western Europe, Global Retail and Commercial Banking IT, Barclaycard, Global Payments, Emerging Markets, BGI, Absa and Barclays Capital;

reviewed the effectiveness and independence of the Group of one year and normally for retirement at age 65, except for Naguib Kheraj who has left the Group. The Committee’s policy is that executive Directors’ contracts should allow for termination with contractual notice from the Group or, in the alternative, termination by way of payment in lieu of notice (in phased instalments). In the event of gross misconduct, neither notice nor a payment in lieu of notice will be given. Payments in lieu of notice are subject to contractual mitigation.statutory auditor;

The Committee’s approach when considering payments in the event of termination is to take account of the individual circumstances including the reason for termination, contractual obligations and share and pension plan rules.

Directorsa

Effective
date of
contract
Notice
period 

b
Potential
compensation
for loss of office


John Varley

1st Sept 20041 year1 year’s
contractual
remuneration 


c

Robert E Diamond Jr

1st Jun 20051 year

Gary Hoffman

1st Jan 20041 year

Naguib Kherajd

1st Jan 20041 year

Chris Lucase

1st Apr 20071 year

Frits Seegers

7th Jun 20061 year

 

approved the re-appointment, remuneration and engagement letter of the Group statutory auditor;

considered the provision of non-audit services by the Group statutory auditor – more details can be found in the box on page 151;

received reports from the external and internal auditors;

monitored the performance of the Internal Audit function;

reviewed the Global Internal Audit Plan;

reviewed the internal control and risk management systems;

LOGO


Barclays Capital, BGI, Barclays Wealth and GRCBBoard Audit Committee Chairman’s Statement

We held ten meetings in 2008 and an overview of how we used our meetings is set out below.

Our areas of focus in 2008 were dominated by the continuing disruption to the credit markets and financial services sector as a whole. In early 2008, we held a separate session of the Committee on accounting for and valuation of derivatives and complex financial instruments and also reviewed the Group’s valuation methodology for these instruments. The latter comprises trading desk evaluation supported by independent price testing and benchmarking, followed by a review by Finance and Risk and by the external auditor.

When considering the Group’s preliminary and half-year results and interim management statements, we spent a significant amount of time reviewing the disclosures around and the fair value of Barclays Capital’s credit markets exposures, including asset backed securities and leveraged credit positions. As part of the approval of each results statement, we reviewed the fair value of the credit market exposures and the form and content of the disclosures. The review of the credit market exposure valuations included a review of marks by key asset categories, movements in exposures (including sales/paydowns) and a review of underlying collateral by vintage and rating. The Committee received at both the half-year and year-end and before each Interim Management Statement a specific presentation from Barclays Capital’s Chief Operating Officer and discussed the valuations with the Group Finance Director, Group Risk Director and, importantly, the Group’s external auditors. Reassurance was sought from independent Group control functions such as Risk and Finance, and the external auditors, that the individual marks were appropriate. The Committee was reassured that there were no significant variations between the prices at which assets were sold and the underlying marks. The Committee was content that the markets and models to which the valuations are marked are sufficiently robust to enable reliable and relevant valuations to be determined.

We also reviewed the controls around Barclays Capital’s complex financial instruments, as well as reviewing the overall control environment at Barclays Capital. The Committee has established frameworkssought to learn lessons from events at our peers, receiving reports on the circumstances surrounding losses experienced at Société Générale and UBS. We discussed the overall impact of market conditions and the challenging financial markets on the remit of the Committee and this will help shape our agenda for 2009.

In the second half of the year, as the financial crisis started to evolve into a global economic downturn, the Committee directed increasing attention at the deepening economic downturn, reviewing the key controls by which consequent risk can be managed. As a result, impairment measurement, fraud controls, collections activities and day-to-day credit controls and security documentation are receiving increased scrutiny from the Committee. During the year we also received additional presentations and reports on the impact of the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North

American businesses in September 2008, including an initial assessment of the risks and controls in that business and a report on the impact of the acquisition on financial reporting. In reviewing the Internal Audit Plan for 2009, we also challenged management to make sure that the Internal Audit function is appropriately resourced for the governance of remunerationchallenges ahead and is directing its attention on areas likely to come under pressure in these businesses. Ranges have been set for key financialthe expected downturn.

Impairment numbers continue to be closely reviewed by the Committee. It reviews a paper prepared by the Risk function, which examines impairment on a business-by-business basis. It examines closely any amendments or overrides to models, compares trends and remuneration ratios. The Committee approves aggregate bonusimpairment levels with peers and long-term incentive expenditure, and strategic investment for new hires. The Committee also approves individual remuneration forseeks independent reassurance from the membersexternal auditor.

Our reviews of the management teams, and any employee with total remunerationcontrol environment in excesseach of £750,000.

The BGI EOP

BGIour businesses in 2008 continued to focus on those areas where the Group’s business is Barclays asset management business headquartered in San Francisco. The BGI EOP (BGI Equity Ownership Plan) was approved by shareholders at Barclays 2000 AGMexpanding or which are deemed to providebe higher risk, including Emerging Markets. We also reviewed the employee share incentive arrangements required to recruit and retain the quality of senior management and investment talent appropriate for building a global investment management business. The BGI EOP was designed to provide participants with a long-term equity interest in BGI to meet the expectations of,controls around our key regulatory programmes, in particular, BGI’sSarbanes-Oxley and Basel II, and received regular reports on Sanctions compliance and Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering controls.

The internal and external auditors are evaluated annually. Feedback on both is sought from key investment talentstakeholders in the United States, who could expectGroup via questionnaires with the results being presented to participate in the equity of their employer. Under the terms of the BGI EOP, options are granted at fair value to key BGI employees over shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited (BGI Holdings) within an overall cap of 20% of the issued ordinary share capital of BGI Holdings.

All grants of options are approvedand discussed by the Committee. The Committee is satisfied with the performance of both auditors. During 2009, an external assessment of the internal audit function will be undertaken. The Committee has recommended to the Board and to shareholders that PwC should be re-appointed as the Group’s auditors at the AGM on 23rd April 2009. We are fully satisfied that PwC provides effective, independent challenge to management, which has been crucial in the current difficult environment, and has provided valued support to the Committee in the advice given and the clarity of their briefings and reports. The feedback received from other stakeholders through the annual evaluation exercise has been positive.

As Chairman of the Committee, I have liaised as appropriate with the Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee, particularly to draw attention to any specific aspects of the Group’s results which I feel he ought to be aware of when determining appropriate levels of compensation.

The Committee can confirm that it received sufficient, reliable and timely information from management to enable it to fulfil its responsibilities.

LOGO

Stephen Russell

Chairman of the Board Audit Committee

5th March 2009

150

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

considered the effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls over financial reporting;

received regular reports on ‘Raising Concerns’, including whistleblowing;

considered the Fraud Risk Control Framework; and

reviewed its Terms of Reference to satisfy itself that they enable the Committee to fulfill its responsibilities.

The Committee also received regular updates during 2008 on:

Basel II

MiFID

Sarbanes-Oxley

Sanctions compliance

In February 2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Approval of financial statements

Barclays has a strong governance process in place to support its framework of disclosure controls and procedures. That process, in which the Board Audit Committee plays a key role, is illustrated in Figure 6.

The Legal and Technical Review Committee is an accounting, legal and regulatory compliance committee, which is responsible for reviewing the Group’s financial reports and disclosures to ensure that they have been subject to adequate verification and comply with legal and technical requirements. Meetings are attended by the Group’s auditors and US lawyers. The membership of the Disclosure Committee and its role is set out on page 154. The membership of the Executive Committee and its role is set out on pages 153 and 154.

This governance process is in place to ensure both management and the Board are given sufficient opportunity to review and challenge the Group’s financial statements and other significant disclosures before they are made public. It also provides assurance for the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director when providing certifications as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and recommended by the Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control. Further details of the Group’s system of internal control and an assessment of its effectiveness may be found on page 173.

Non-Audit Services Policy

The Committee takes seriously its responsibility to put in place safeguards to auditor objectivity and independence. It has therefore established a policy on the provision of services by the Group’s statutory auditor. The Policy describes the circumstances in which the auditor may be permitted to undertake non-audit work for the Group. The Committee oversees compliance with the Policy and considers and approves requests to use the auditor for non-audit work. Allowable services are pre-approved up to £100,000, or £10,000 in the case of certain taxation services. The Company Secretary and his team deal with day-to-day administration of the Policy, facilitating requests for approval by the Committee. The Committee receives a report at each meeting on the non-audit services provided by the auditor and the Policy is reviewed by the Committee annually. Details of the services that are prohibited and allowed are set out below.

Services that are prohibited include:

–  bookkeeping

–  design and implementation of financial information systems

–  appraisal or valuation services

–  actuarial services

–  internal audit outsourcing

–  management and Human Resource functions

–  broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services

–  legal, expert and tax services involving advocacy

Allowable services that the Committee will consider for approval include:

–  statutory and regulatory audit services and regulatory non-audit services

–  other attest and assurance services

–  accountancy advice and training

–  risk management and controls advice

–  transaction support

–  taxation services

–  business support and recoveries

–  translation services


LOGO

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

151


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Board Risk Committee

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

David Booth

Dr Danie Cronjé (to 24th April 2008)

Sir Andrew Likierman

Stephen Russell

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Risk Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

In addition to the Members of the Committee, all meetings are usually attended by the Group Finance Director and Group Risk Director. Barclays Internal Audit Director, Group General Counsel and Barclays external auditor, as well as other senior executives, also attend meetings of the Board Risk Committee, where appropriate.

The Board recognises that risk is a key parameter for the business.

The Board Risk Committee provides monitoring and oversight of all Barclays risk activities. During 2008, the Committee received presentations and updates on key aspects of the external market conditions to ensure it was able to maintain an appropriate level of oversight and report effectively to the Board.

Activities in 2008

The Committee met four times in 2008 and Figure 7 shows how the Committee allocated its time at those meetings. During 2008, the Committee:

received regular reports on, and considered, Risk Appetite and the Group’s risk profile, including key indicators for Risk Appetite, Group Impairment, Retail Credit Risk, Wholesale Credit Risk, Market Risk, Financial Crime, Operational Risk and Economic Capital;

reviewed at each meeting updates on asset backed securities and leveraged credit markets, including the Group’s exposures to sub-prime and Alt-A markets, monoline insurers and leveraged loan underwriting positions;

reviewed updates on liquidity risk;

reviewed risk trends and risk management in GRCB – Emerging Markets and South Africa;

received regular Forward Risk Trends reports, which set out the internal and external indicators that are showing signs of strain;

reviewed the internal control framework;

examined the risk control framework, and approved Group policies including the trading book policy, large exposures policy, liquidity policy, retail and wholesale credit impairment policies and the Group’s principal risks policy;

reviewed Group-wide stress testing scenarios and results;

reviewed in greater detail the process around setting annual Risk Appetite to establish the effectiveness of the process in responding to significant changes in economic and market conditions;

reviewed the programme of actions being taken Group-wide to mitigate risk in view of deteriorating economic conditions in our major markets, such as the UK, US, South Africa and Spain;

reviewed the Risk Appetite for the Group for 2009 and made recommendations to the Board; and.

received updates on Basel II.

LOGO

Board Risk Committee Chairman’s Statement

2008 was a challenging year for risk management and this was reflected in the work of the Committee, which is detailed below. Particular areas worthy of note were:

–  The Committee monitored the Group’s sub-prime exposures throughout the year. The reduction in limits and scale of the sub-prime business in 2007 reduced the impact of the crisis, although substantial write-downs were still required during 2008, reflecting a further deterioration in the markets and underlying performance of the assets.

–  The Committee also advisedmonitored the Group’s exposure to other areas affected by the crisis, including other asset-backed securities, commercial mortgages and monoline insurers.

–  The Committee reviewed and compared the write-downs being taken in the sub-prime and related areas with those being taken by the industry.

–  The Committee monitored carefully the Group’s overall risk exposure in the light of option exercisesthe anticipated worsening in economic conditions and reviewed management plans to manage and mitigate the effects of the expected downturn in multiple markets.

–  The Committee also monitored the capital position throughout the year relative to regulatory requirements and the Group’s overall risk appetite. Several steps were taken throughout the year to strengthen the capital base prior to the events of October 2008 when the regulator changed the capital requirements for banks, requiring a further and substantial capital raising.

–  The Committee played an active role in informing Board debate about Risk Appetite and capital planning for 2009.

LOGO

Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman of the Board Risk Committee

5th March 2009

In March 2009, the Committee will review its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference.

More information on risk management and the internal control framework can be found in the Risk management report on pages 57 to 136.


152

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Board Corporate Governance and

Nominations Committee

Marcus Agius (Chairman)

Sir Richard Broadbent

Sir Nigel Rudd

Stephen Russell

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

The meetings are also attended by the Group Chief Executive.

Activities in 2008

Figure 8 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2008. During 2008, the Committee:

reviewed Board and Board Committee composition to ensure the right mix of skills and experience are present;

monitored the progress of the action plan arising from the 2007 Board Effectiveness Review and oversaw the conduct of the 2008 Board Effectiveness Review;

reviewed the corporate governance disclosures for the 2007 Annual Report and considered the proposed disclosures for 2008;

reviewed and updated Corporate Governance in Barclays and the Charter of Expectations; and

reviewed succession plans for the Executive Committee and the position of Group Chief Executive.

The Committee also received updates on:

the status of the Companies Act 2006 and, in particular, the new statutory statement of Directors’ Duties on Conflicts of Interest.

During 2008, the Committee reviewed the composition of the Board and its principal Committees at each of its meetings. Following those deliberations, the Committee recommended to the Board that Sir Michael Rake succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Board Audit Committee with effect from March 2009. No new Directors were appointed to the Board during 2008, other than Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft, who joined the Board with effect from 1st January 2008.

Given that Sir Nigel Rudd and Professor Dame Sandra Dawson will be retiring from the Board at the 2009 AGM and Stephen Russell will be retiring in October 2009 on completion of nine years’ service, the Committee also discussed both Board size and future Board composition and, in particular, given the continuing crisis in the world financial services industry, the type of skills and experience required in new non-executive Directors.

In early 2009, the Committee concluded that a non-executive Director with experience of institutional fund management should be sought and, with the assistance of external search consultants, Simon Fraser was identified as a candidate with the desired experience. He met with members of the Board Corporate Governance & Nominations Committee and his appointment was recommended to the Board, who approved his appointment as a Director. Simon will join the Board on 10th March 2009, subject to regulatory approvals.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into between Barclays and China Development Bank (CDB) in August 2007 for the subscription of Barclays ordinary shares, CDB retain the right to nominate a non-executive Director to the Board of Barclays but did not take up this right during 2008.

In January 2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

Marcus Agius

Leigh Clifford

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Patrick Gonsalves

The Board HR and Remuneration Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com

Additional information on the role and activities of the Committee can be found in the Remuneration Report on pages 157 to 173, including the Group’s revised philosophy on remuneration, an explanation of the Group’s remuneration arrangements and a description of the framework for future decisions in this area.

Activities in 2008

Figure 9 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2008. The Committee held additional meetings in November 2008 and January 2009, as a result of the rapidly changing economic environment and the intense scrutiny from regulators and other interested parties that the issue of remuneration has received.

During 2008 the Committee:

continued to review the compensation frameworks in place for each area of the Group;

reviewed executive compensation;

reviewed the Group’s approach to remuneration in light of market conditions;

approved the Pensions Strategy and other pension matters;

reviewed global staff benefits;

monitored the implementation of the talent agenda;

reviewed the Group’s Health and Safety and Diversity and Inclusion performance;

considered incentive funding for 2008 for each main business area;

reviewed, current and future, Group and business long-term incentive arrangements; and

held discussions with external advisers to the Committee on a range of issues, including obtaining market data on remuneration levels in specified markets.

The Committee received valuable support and advice from its independent advisers, Towers Perrin MGMC and Kepler Associates.

Management

Executive Committee

Under the leadership of the Group Chief Executive, the executive Directors are responsible for managing the Group’s business and making and executing operational decisions. The Executive Committee supports the Group Chief Executive and it meets every fortnight to discuss strategy development and policies to recommend to the Board. The Executive Committee is also responsible for implementing approved strategy and is supported by other Committees, including the Disclosure Committee.


LOGO

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

153


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Executive Committee

John Varley (Chairman)

Bob Diamond

Chris Lucas

Frits Seegers

Disclosure Committee

The Disclosure Committee is chaired by Chris Lucas, the Group Finance Director. Members include the Company Secretary, Group General Counsel, Director, Investor Relations, Group Risk Director, Barclays Corporate Affairs Director, Group Financial Controller and Barclays Treasurer. The Committee:

considers and reviews the preliminary and half-year results, Annual Report/Annual Report on Form 20F and the Annual Review; and

considers Interim Management Statements released to the Stock Exchange.

The Committee also considers the content, accuracy and tone of significant other announcements that are proposed to be made in accordance with the FSA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

The Committee reports to the Executive Committee and also reports to the Board Audit Committee, documenting its conclusions about the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures. This forms part of the combined assurance given to the

Board Audit Committee together with the report on the Turnbull Review of Internal Controls recommended by the Code.

Board Effectiveness

Performance Review

The Code recommends that an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees is conducted annually. The evaluation in 2007 was independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International. All Directors were sent a questionnaire to complete and return to Egon Zehnder International and these were discussed in individual interviews, which included peer review. The following actions were agreed for 2008:

minor enhancements around the form and content of Board papers and presentations; and

refining the Board calendar of business.

The 2008 evaluation was again independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International and took the form of detailed questionnaires, which were completed by each Director, individual interviews and peer evaluation of fellow Directors. As in previous years, the evaluation covered the following areas:

Group performance;

Strategy and performance objectives;

Reporting to shareholders/stakeholders;

Structure, people, succession planning and remuneration;

Decision-making process;

Information flows;

Board structure and composition;

Board roles and responsibilities;

Board and Management relationships;

Board meetings; and

Board Committees.

The results of the evaluation were presented to the Board in December 2008. The results from the overall review showed a continuation of the five-year trend of improving scores and the Board concluded that the Board and the principal Board Committees continue to operate effectively in terms of communication, information flows and Directors’ participation and engagement, particularly during the period of difficult market conditions in 2008. The Directors recognised however, and were disappointed, that Group performance has not met shareholder expectations and acknowledged that they are accountable to shareholders for their stewardship of the Group during the exceptional events of 2008.

From the results of the 2008 evaluation, action points and issues that were discussed included:

continued focus on the Board’s calendar of business to ensure that non-critical items are removed or kept to a minimum, thereby ensuring that sufficient time can be allocated to items fundamental to the success of the Group;

refinements to the Board’s calendar of business, including additional time to be spent on items such as compensation strategy and succession planning;

the overall size and composition of the Board; and

refinements to the process for evaluating the performance of individual Directors.

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee has agreed an action plan to progress improvements in 2009.

In terms of individual Director performance, the Group Chairman held private meetings with non-executive Directors in early 2009 so that individual and general results could be discussed. Development plans relating to their own individual performance were agreed. The Senior Independent Director met privately with the other non-executive Directors and the Group Chief Executive to discuss feedback he received on the Group Chairman’s performance. These results were then shared with the Group Chairman.

Director Development and Business Awareness

A comprehensive development and awareness programme is in place for Directors. This comprises:

an induction programme, when they join the Board;

briefings on the business of Barclays; and

briefings on external technical matters.

Induction

All new Directors receive an induction presentation, which explains their responsibilities as a Director of a global, listed company and provides an overview of the Group and its businesses. An information pack, that gives details of the disclosures that Directors are obliged to make to the Company to comply with various laws and regulations, is also provided to each new Director. A personal induction programme is scheduled with each new Director so that they can further acquaint themselves with the Group and its businesses. Each new Director attends sessions with each of the executive Directors and the heads of the main Group functions, which includes opportunities to visit operational sites to meet with senior management and employees. The second part of their induction programme includes additional sessions with the executive Directors and senior managers from each of the Group’s main business units to provide the new Director with detailed and in-depth understanding of those businesses. The sessions focus on the challenges, opportunities and risks that are faced by each business unit. Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft undertook their induction programmes during 2008.

In 2008, non-executive Directors were asked to complete a questionnaire and give feedback on topics on which they would like to receive additional briefings. Two in-depth briefing sessions were arranged during 2008 on impairment recognition and forecasting and on Barclays Capital’s traded products, including asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and collateralised debt obligations.

The Board and the Board Audit and Board Risk Committees received further briefings to ensure they were kept up to date with the changing global economic conditions, including updates on capital management, presentations on asset-backed securities and liquidity risk, mark-to-market valuations and briefing material to support the various capital raising proposals and acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

Barclays businesses and operations

During 2008, one Board meeting was held off-site. The Board met in China in September and received presentations on the economic and political outlook in China and met key Barclays staff working in the Asia-Pacific region.


154

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Group Chief Executive, John Varley, helped to launch UK National Branch Week by visiting the Coventry High Street branch. During the course of the week, around 400 senior executives from the Group went back to the floor to experience first hand the successes and challenges colleagues in the branches are facing. Each day had a theme including raising the profile of Barclays product range, employee benefits, the importance of customer service, personal development and charity fundraising. A number of Directors participated and worked alongside cashiers, personal bankers and co-ordinators for the day.

John Varley also spent time giving presentations to colleagues on the Group’s capital raising proposals. He kept colleagues up to date on how market conditions were affecting Barclays and the decisions the Board was taking in respect of the capital raising options that were available. All colleagues were invited to attend the presentations in person or via conference call and John Varley answered questions raised by colleagues from around the world.

External matters

Directors are regularly briefed on market opinion and receive copies of analyst research and press commentary. Further briefing material on market conditions was sent to Directors during 2008 and Directors continue to receive relevant publications to keep them up to date with changing market opinion. Directors are invited to attend results presentations to meet with analysts and investors to enhance their awareness of market sentiment.

Statement on US Corporate Governance Standards

The statement required by NYSE is set out below.

Director independence

NYSE Rules require the majority of the Board to be independent.

The Code requires at least half of the Board (excluding the Chairman) to be independent. The NYSE Rules contain detailed tests for determining whether a Director is independent, whereas the Code requires the Board to determine whether each Director is independent in character and judgement and sets out criteria that may be relevant to that determination. We follow the Code’s recommendations as well as developing best practices among other UK public companies. The independence of our non-executive Directors is reviewed by the Board on an annual basis and it takes into account the guidance in the Code and the criteria we have established for determining independence, which are described on pages 147 and 148.

Board Committees

We have a Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and a Board HR and Remuneration (rather than Compensation) Committee, both of which are broadly similar in purpose and constitution to the Committees required by the NYSE Rules and whose terms of reference comply with the Code’s requirements. As the Group Chairman was independent on appointment, the Code permits him to chair the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and be a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. Except for these appointments, both Committees are composed solely of non-executive Directors, whom the Board has determined to be independent. We follow the Code recommendation that a majority of the Nominations Committee should be independent non-executive Directors, whereas the NYSE Rules state that the Committee must be composed entirely of independent Directors. We comply with the NYSE Rules regarding the obligation to have a Board Audit Committee that meets the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act, including the requirements relating to the independence of Committee members. In April 2008, we made an Annual Written Affirmation of our compliance with these requirements to the NYSE. The Code also requires us to have a Board Audit Committee comprised solely of independent non-executive Directors. However, we follow the Code recommendations, rather than the NYSE Rules regarding the responsibilities of the Board Audit Committee, although both are broadly comparable. We also have a Board Risk Committee, comprised of independent non-executive Directors, which considers and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE Rules require domestic US companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. There is no equivalent recommendation in the Code but the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee has developed corporate governance guidelines, ‘Corporate Governance in Barclays’, which have been approved and adopted by the Board.

Code of Ethics

The NYSE Rules require that domestic US companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, officers and employees. Rather than a single consolidated code as envisaged in the NYSE Rules, we have a number of ‘values based’ business conduct and ethics policies which apply to all employees. In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Group Chief Executive and senior financial officers as required by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholder approval of equity-compensation plans

The NYSE listing standards require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. We comply with UK requirements, which are similar to the NYSE standards. However, the Board does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition of what are considered ‘material revisions’.

Relations with Shareholders

Institutional investors

A key priority for the Board in 2008 was communicating with shareholders, particularly ahead of the General Meeting in November 2008, and also afterwards in order to provide further details to shareholders on the key decision points during the capital raising process. In the normal course of events, the Board aims to keep shareholders up to date and informed about how the Company is performing and its strategy, whilst ensuring that it listens to the opinions of major shareholders and takes their views on board. Executive Directors and senior executives hold group and one to one meetings with major investors to ensure we are communicating effectively. Analyst research notes are distributed to Directors and our corporate brokers provide regular feedback to the Board. The Investor Relations team organise roadshows, seminars, conferences, presentations and other activities that enable the Directors to interact with investors. The Group Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary conduct a series of meetings with the corporate governance representatives of our major institutional shareholders ahead of each AGM. Meetings were held with our major institutional shareholders to discuss the capital raising proposals.

Private shareholders

The Board has also tried to keep private shareholders up to date with information about the capital raising proposals during 2008. In June 2008, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders regarding the Open Offer, which took place in July. Personalised forms were also sent to shareholders with a question and answer booklet to help explain the details of the Open Offer and how to complete the forms. Further documents were available on the Group’s website and sent to shareholders on request. In November, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders and Notice of General Meeting, which set out the details of the Capital Raising that required shareholder approval. A follow-up letter was also sent to shareholders to inform them of developments and to advise shareholders that all Directors would offer themselves for re-election at the 2009 AGM and that the executive Directors had all agreed to waive their bonus for 2008. An open letter to shareholders, clients, customers and colleagues from the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive was released to the London Stock Exchange on 26th January 2009 ahead of the publication of the annual results announcement on 9th February 2009.

The change in the law that allows us to communicate electronically with shareholders has enabled us to use less paper, which benefits the environment and lowers distribution costs for the Group. All shareholder documents are available electronically as soon as they are published but shareholders can still receive communications in paper format if they wish. This year we will continue to post the Annual Review, Notice of Meeting and proxy forms to all shareholders.

We encourage shareholders to hold their shares in Barclays Sharestore, where shares are held electronically in a cost-effective and secure environment. Shareholders can use our e-view service to receive their shareholder documents electronically and they can also use this service to get immediate access to information relating to their personal shareholding and dividend history. E-view participants can also change their details and dividend mandates online and receive dividend tax vouchers electronically.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

155


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Annual General Meeting/General Meeting

The 2008 AGM was held on 24th April 2008 at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. In accordance with best practice, all resolutions were considered on a poll and the results were made available on our website the same day. 52.9% of the shares in issue were voted and all resolutions were approved. All Directors are encouraged to attend the AGM and are available to answer shareholder questions. All Directors attended the 2008 AGM, with the exception of Dr Danie Cronjé, who was retiring from the Board on that day. A class meeting of ordinary shareholders was also held on 24th April 2008 for shareholders to consider the resolution of the AGM that created new preference share classes. 50.5% of the shares in issue were voted and the resolution was approved by shareholders.

A general meeting (GM) was held on 24th November 2008, at ExCel London, where shareholders were asked to approve resolutions in connection with the Capital Raising proposals. 60.8% of the shares in issue were voted on a poll and all resolutions were approved. The results of the poll were made available on our website on the same day. The Group Chairman, all of the executive Directors and four non-executive Directors, including the Senior Independent Director, Deputy Chairman and Board Audit Committee Chairman, attended the GM.

The 2009 AGM will be held on 23rd April 2009 at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. The Notice of Meeting is enclosed with this Annual Report as a separate document. The resolutions will be considered on a poll and the results will be available on our website on 23rd April 2009.

Signed on behalf of the Board

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

5th March 2009


156

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Statement from the Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee

Context

The disruption in the capital markets that commenced in 2007 deepened in 2008 resulting in one of the most challenging years ever for the global financial services sector. As 2008 closed it was clear that the depth of the financial crisis was so severe that a significant global economic downturn was unavoidable. The extent to which remuneration structures may have played a role in contributing to the financial crisis was still being debated and under scrutiny as this statement was written. Whatever outcomes prevail it is certain the remuneration structures will be different in the future.

As a consequence of events, the Committee commenced its deliberations for the 2008 performance year earlier than usual and met more times than is typical. The agenda rapidly developed into two work streams: first, the immediate decisions for 2008; and, second, the long-term shape of remuneration. Work continues on the latter and will extend into 2009. Our guiding principle throughout all decisions has been ‘pay for performance’.

2008

Barclays delivered profit of £6,077m, 14% lower than 2007. Although profitability, on an absolute and relative basis, compares favourably across the sector, several features of performance resulted in a more severe reduction in variable remuneration:

1.The significant under performance of the share sales by employees.price and the absolute reduction in market capitalisation (£20bn in 2008)

2.The decision not to pay a final dividend for 2008

3.The significantly lower absolute performance and weaker earnings in Barclays Capital

The variable pay for the Group reduced 48% relative to 2007. Accountability rests at the most senior levels and key factors relating to executive Directors include:

zero annual performance bonus for 2008

no salary increases for 2009

executive Directors of Barclays PLCwho have long-term performance shares due to be released in 2009 shall agree that these be deferred for a further two years and subject to additional financial performance over that period.

the total 2009 long-term awards are 64% lower than last year, with no awards for the Chief Executive and President.

An assessment of Barclays remuneration structures and how well the calibration had worked during this stressed period shows significant alignment with shareholders:

the existing long-term performance share plan award cycles (2007/09 and 2008/10) are not eligibleexpected to receive optionsvest

the cumulative effect of delivering significant proportions of remuneration in Barclays shares (which are typically held on a long- term basis) has resulted in the executive Directors’ share interests decreasing in value by an aggregate of £63m in 2008, which when added to the decrease of £32m in 2007 totals £95m for the two year period

the value of employee interests in shares under the BGI EOP.

In summary the BGI EOP operates as follows:

certain key BGI employees are granted options over shares in BGI Holdings;Barclays employee share plans has decreased over 2007 and 2008 by approximately £2bn.

 

the option exercise price is based on the fair value of a BGI Holdings share at the date of grant determined by an independent appraiser;

Future of Remuneration

The Committee commenced a review of remuneration during 2008. The objective of the review was to assess how the pay for performance culture and alignment with shareholders could be strengthened further. As the review advanced it became clear that the mandate ought to be extended to incorporate a broader industry wide review of remuneration. So far the Committee has:

revised the remuneration policy (see page 158) to accentuate risk management and the role of behaviours in the determination of remuneration

the options generally vest evenly over a three-year period and can normally be exercised in two annual exercise windows;

option holders are required to fund the exercise without any financial support from any member of the Barclays Group.

Once employees become shareholders, they are subjectincreased the shareholding requirements for executive Directors (from 1x to the Articleshigher of BGI Holdings under which:2x times base salary or average total annual cash compensation over the prior three years)

announced a new plan in the first quarter of 2009 for approximately 15,000 employees to significantly increase the proportion of remuneration paid over multiple years.

The review is continuing and will address detailed remuneration plans and proposals which will be developed during 2009. The challenge for the industry is to use this period to develop robust remuneration structures that balance commercial enterprise with risk in the interests of all stakeholders.

Barclays will be engaged in extensive dialogue and consultation with shareholders in developing its new proposals. An update on progress will be provided at the AGM.

Report

The following report of the Committee provides further explanation of the current remuneration governance and arrangements for executive Directors and is divided into the following sections:

Committee remit, members and advisers

Remuneration policy and governance

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Non-executive Directors’ remuneration

Former Directors’ remuneration

Share plan descriptions

The Committee unanimously recommends that you vote at the 2009 AGM to approve the Remuneration Report as all Directors will be doing with their own Barclays shares.

On behalf of the Board

 

shareholders are required to hold the shares for a minimum of 355 days. As shareholders, employees derive the full risks and rewards of ownership, including voting rights and entitlement to any ordinary dividends paid by BGI Holdings;

on expiry of the minimum holding period, shareholders may, but are not obliged to, offer their shares for sale usually during two annual sales windows;

LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC, at its discretion, has a right to purchase shares so offered, but is not obliged to do so.

Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman, Board HR and Remuneration Committee
5th March 2009

 

NotesBarclays

aDetails of executive Directors standing for re-election at the 2008 AGM are set out on page 114.

Annual Report 2008

157


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

 

bNotice period from Barclays to executive Director.

Board HR and Remuneration Committee remit and membership

The Committee provides governance and strategic oversight of executive and all other employee remuneration, Barclays Human Resource activities and senior management development. The Committee’s terms of reference are available in the Corporate Governance section of the websitehttp://www.aboutbarclays.com. The Committee met formally five times during 2008. After each formal meeting the Chairman of the Committee presented a report to the full Board. A report on the Committee’s activities is set out on page 153 as part of the Corporate Governance Report.

The members of the Committee, are Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman), Marcus Agius (Group Chairman), Leigh Clifford and Sir John Sunderland.

The non-executive Directors who are Committee members are considered by the Board to be independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could materially affect the exercise of their independent judgement.

Advisers

The Committee’s work is supported by independent professional advice. The Committee reviews the appointment of advisers each year. Towers Perrin MGMC and Kepler Associates were both re-appointed by the Committee in 2008. Deloitte LLP also advised the Committee. Any potential conflicts of interest the advisers may have are disclosed to the Committee. In addition to advising the Committee, Towers Perrin MGMC provided remuneration benchmarking data and Deloitte LLP and its affiliates also provided remuneration benchmarking data, tax, regulatory, information technology risk, pensions , corporate finance and consulting services to the Barclays Group.

The Group Chief Executive, the Human Resources Director and, as necessary, members of the Executive Committee, also advise the Committee, supported by their teams. No employee of Barclays Group is permitted to participate in discussions or decisions of the Committee relating to their own remuneration.

Remuneration Policy

During the year the Committee revised the Barclays Remuneration Policy. The revised policy is to:

1. Attract and retain those people with the ability, experience and skill to deliver the strategy.

2. Create a direct and recognisable alignment between the rewards and risk exposure of shareholders and employees, particularly executive Directors and senior management.

3. Incentivise employees to deliver sustained performance consistent with strategic goals and appropriate risk management, and to reward success in this.

 

cOne year’s contractual remuneration is calculated as follows: 12 months’ base salary, bonus, if eligible (being the average of the previous three years’ bonus awards, in some cases (Gary Hoffman, Chris Lucas and Naguib Kheraj) capped at 100% of base salary), medical benefit (while an employee) and continuation of pension benefits. Payments in lieu of notice are subject to mitigation if alternative employment is found during any period in which pay in lieu of notice is paid.

4. Deliver compensation that is affordable and appropriate in terms of value allocated to shareholders and employees.

5. Encourage behaviour consistent with the principles that guide Barclays business:

i)Winning together

 

dNaguib Kheraj ceased to be an executive Director on 31st March 2007.

Doing what is right for Barclays, its teams and colleagues, to achieve collective and individual success.

ii)Best People

Developing talented colleagues and differentiating compensation to reflect performance.

Doing what is needed to ensure a leading position in the global financial services industry.

iii)Customer and Client Focus

Understanding what customers and clients want and need and then serving them brilliantly.

Executive Directors’ remuneration – alignment of interests with shareholders

Figure 1 shows the aggregate total direct remuneration of the executive Directors for 2007 and 2008 (as shown in Table 1) compared to the indicative fair value movements on the executive Directors’ aggregate share based remuneration and beneficial interests in Barclays shares from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2008 (as shown in Table 7). The performance of Barclays share price has been shown for context. The chart shows that the executive Directors’ interests have decreased in value by £95m over 2007 and 2008 as a consequence of the movement in Barclays share price.

 

LOGO


158

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

iv)Pioneering

Driving new ideas, especially those that make Barclays profitable and improve control.

Improving operational excellence.

Adding diverse skills to stimulate new perspectives and bold steps.

v)Trusted

Acting with the highest levels of integrity to retain the trust of customers, shareholders, other external stakeholders and colleagues.

Taking full responsibility for decisions and actions.

Reflecting the operation of independent, robust and evidence-based governance and control and complying with relevant legal and regulatory requirements.

The Committee keeps the remuneration policy and arrangements, as detailed in this Report, under review to ensure that Barclays programmes remain competitive and provide appropriate incentive for performance.

Remuneration Policy Governance

To ensure appropriate operation of the remuneration policy, the Committee has established frameworks for the governance of remuneration in the Global Retail and Commercial Banking and Investment Banking and Investment Management businesses and for the Group as a whole. These frameworks will be reviewed in 2009. The current frameworks set out key financial ratios

achieved by Barclays and its competitors and have been used by the Committee to inform its decision-making process when approving aggregate remuneration spend, including bonus and long-term incentive expenditure, strategic investment for new hires, and the remuneration arrangements of any employee with annual total remuneration equal to or in excess of £750,000.

For all individual remuneration decisions made by the Committee, including those for executive Directors, the Committee reviews each element of remuneration relative to performance and to the practice of other comparable organisations. Remuneration is benchmarked against the markets in which we compete for talent. This includes benchmarking against other leading international banks and financial services organisations, and other companies of similar size to Barclays in the FTSE 100 Index.

Given the materiality of Barclays pension arrangements, the Committee operates a specific framework for the management of pensions to ensure proper oversight. The Global Retirement Fund Governance Framework is operated to ensure best practice in respect of regulatory compliance, governance, investment and administration. Details of the pension arrangements in place for executive Directors are set out on page 164 and for other employees on page 160.

As required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A of the Companies Act 1985, the Group’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have audited the information contained in Tables 1b, 3, 5, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 on pages 162 to 168.

Total Shareholder Return

Figure 2 shows the value, at 31st December 2008, of £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 100 Index. The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. The FTSE 100 Index is a widely recognised performance comparison for large UK companies and this is why it has been chosen as a comparator to illustrate Barclays TSR. The graph shows that, at the end of 2008, a hypothetical £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 would have generated a total loss of £59, compared with a gain of £18 if invested in the FTSE 100 Index.

eChris Lucas was appointed as an executive Director with effect from 1st April 2007.

 

Barclays

LOGO


Annual Report 2007

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

159


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Executive Director’s Pay

Table 1 explains the purpose of each element of remuneration and shows executive Directors’ remuneration for 2008 and 2007.

Base Salaries

The executive Directors will receive no base salary increase in 2009.

Table 2: Base salary

    Base salary at
31st Dec 2008
£000
  Base salary at
1st April 2009
£000
  Date of
previous
increase
Executive Directors         

John Varley

  1,100  1,100  1st April 2008

Robert E Diamond Jr

  250  250  1st March 1999

Chris Lucas

  650  650  1st April 2008

Frits Seegers

  700  700  n/a

Table 1a: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

ElementPurposeDeliveryProgramme summaryWhen normally received/
awarded
SalaryTo reflect the market value of the individual and their role

–   Cash

–   Monthly

–   Pensionable

–   Reviewed annually, with any increases typically effective on 1st April

Paid in year
Annual performance bonus (cash)To incentivise the delivery of annual goals at the Group, business division and individual levels

–   No more than 75% of annual performance bonus paid in cash

–   At least 25% recommended as deferred share awards under ESAS

–   Non-pensionable

–   Based on annual business unit performance, performance of the Group as a whole and individual contribution

Normally paid in the following financial year
Total cashSub-total of the above 133
 
Deferred share award (ESAS)To align annual performance with shareholder value and increase retention

–   At least 25% of annual performance bonus recommended as deferred share awards under ESAS


–   Non-pensionable

Corporate governance

Remuneration report

The table below contains information on the number–   Discretionary awards of shares to be deferred for three to five years. No performance condition on release, as a deferred share award

–   20% bonus shares releasable after three years, a further 10% after five years

–   Dividends normally accumulated during deferral period

Normally awarded in BGI Holdingsthe following financial year
Long-term incentive (PSP)To reward the creation of above median, sustained growth in shareholder value and Economic Profit (EP) performance

–   Annual awards of shares that vest after three years, subject to performance conditions

–   Non-pensionable

–   Discretionary awards

–   Participation reviewed annually

–   Barclays performance over which options were granted, outstandingthree years determines the performance shares eligible for release to each individual

Normally awarded in the following financial year
Total direct remunerationTotal of the above
Pension (or cash allowance)To provide a market competitive post-retirement benefit

–   Deferred cash or cash allowance

–   Monthly

–   Non-contributory, defined benefit scheme and/or defined contribution scheme, or cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions

Paid or accrued during year
Other benefitsTo provide market competitive benefits

–   Benefit in kind, or cash allowance

–   Non-pensionable

–   Benefits include private medical, insurance life and exercised in 2006disability cover, accommodation overseas when required for business purposes, use of company owned vehicle or cash equivalent and 2007:tax advice

Year

  Number

granted

during year

(000s

 

 

 

)

 Number
outstanding

at year end

(000s

 
 

 

)

 Number

exercised

(000s

 

 

)

    

2006

  3,973  6,929  2,188 

2007

  2,599  7,502  1,632 

In 2007 BGI employees exercised options over 1.6m (2006: 2.2m) shares for consideration of £57m (2006: £44m); Barclays Bank PLC purchased 4.9m (2006: 4.9m) shares offered for sale by shareholders for consideration of £488m (2006: £410m). As at 31st December 2007, employees own 5.9% of BGI Holdings (2006: 9.4%).

BGI EOP – Accounting and disclosure

The BGI EOP is accounted for as an equity settled share-based payment

Received during year
Sub-total in accordance with IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’. The fair valueCompanies Act 1985Total of the services received from the employees is measured by referenceSalary, Annual Cash Bonus, Other Benefits and Pension Cash Allowance

160

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Annual Cash Bonus and Deferred Share Awards

No annual cash bonuses or deferred share awards have been awarded to executive Directors for 2008. The maximum bonus opportunity for executive Directors is normally 250%, but is tailored to the relevant market.

Long-term incentives

PSP Vesting in 2008

The PSP awards made in 2005, due for release in March 2008 lapsed in full as the performance condition was not met.

As disclosed in the 2007 Report and Accounts, in March 2008 Robert E Diamond Jr received a cash payment of £7.425m and an award of shares deferred for one year under ESAS of £7.425m, detailed on pages 162 to 163 from the Retained Incentive Opportunity 2005-2007 in which he participated.

PSP awards due to vest in 2009

For the PSP awards made in relation to the 2006-2008 cycle, the TSR condition was not met and the EP condition was partially met. As a result, awards that are scheduled to vest in March 2009 (at the absolute discretion of the PSP trustee) are due to vest at 1.4 75 times the initial award (maximum is 3 times). This represents approximately 9% of the maximum value of the number of shares that could vest at the share price at award.

After consultation with the Remuneration Committee, the executive Directors intend to write to the PSP trustee to request that it defers the exercise of its discretion to re lease shares to them under the 2006-2008 awards for a further two year period. At the end of that period it is intended that the PSP trustee considers the re lease of the shares, subject to continued employment and a financial performance condition to be agreed and assessed by the Committee.

The maximum number of shares re leasable at the end of the two year period will be 1.475 times the initial award; there will be no opportunity to receive shares in excess of this number (except for any dividend shares that may be awarded at the PSP trustee’s discretion).

Proposed awards in 2009

It is proposed that Chris Lucas and Frits Seegers are awarded a performance share plan award in 2009.

The number of shares awarded to date and the performance conditions relating to each award are set out on pages 162 and 163.

The PSP awards are shown in Table 1b at the fair value of the re commended awards.


 

 

Table 1b: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

    John Varley  Robert E Diamond Jr  Chris Lucas  Frits Seegers
   

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

                

Salary

  1,075  975  250  250  638  450  700  700

Annual performance bonus (cash)

  0  1,425  0  6,500  0  450  0  1,313

Total cash

  1,075  2,400  250  6,750  638  900  700  2,013

Deferred share award (ESAS)

  0  618  0  11,375  0  195  0  569

Fair value of long- term incentive (PSP) award

  0  1,200  0  3,000  800  800  1,600  1,600

Total direct remuneration

  1,075  4,218  250  21,125  1,438  1,895  2,300  4,182

Pension (or cash allowance)

  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  159  113  175  175

Other benefits

  23  18  66  14  18  22  27  24

Sub-total in accordance with Companies Act 1985

  1,098  2,418  316  6,764  815  1,035  902  2,212

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

161


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Share Plans

Barclays operates a number of share plans to align the interests of executive Directors with shareholders. The following tables summarise the interests of each executive Director in each plan and the relevant performance conditions for outstanding PSP cycles. The interests shown are the maximum number of shares that may be received under each plan. Executive Directors do not pay for any share plan award.

During 2008, the number of shares under each award or option has been increased in accordance with the rules by 2.68% and option exercise prices per share have been correspondingly reduced to reflect the impact of the capital raising in July. No other adjustments were made for capital raisings during the year.

Summary descriptions of principal share plans operated by Barclays are shown on pages 169-172.


Table 3: Long-term plans and deferred share plans                
    Number of
shares under
award/option
1st January 2008
(maximum)
  Awarded in
year (maximum)
  Market
price on
award date
  Adjusted
weighted
average
exercise price
  Number
released/
exercised
 

John Varley

          

PSP 2005-2007

  426,135    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  461,244    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  491,130    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    791,208  £4.25      

ISOP

  920,000       £4.29   

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  344,711  135,715  £4.25     (23,214)

Robert E Diamond Jr

          

PSP 2005-2007

  156,249    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  2,306,208    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  2,803,548    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,978,020  £4.25      

ISOP

  560,000       £4.42   

ESOS

  100,000       £3.97   

RIO cash release

             

BGI EOP

  100,000       £20.11   

ESAS

  4,863,749  4,131,868  £4.25     (2,131,463)

Chris Lucas

          

PSP 2007-2009

  248,730    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    527,472  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  69,091  42,857  £4.25     (34,546)

Frits Seegers

          

PSP 2006-2008

  473,184    £6.30      

PSP 2007-2009

  409,278    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,054,944  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,390       £4.70   

ESAS

  231,383  125,000  £4.25     (80,221)

Numbers shown for ESAS above represent provisional allocations that have been awarded. Numbers shown as aggregate ESAS amounts also include shares under option as at 31st December 2008. Nil cost options are normally granted under mandatory ESAS awards at the third anniversary of grant and are exercisable (over initial allocation and two-thirds of bonus shares) typically for two years. The aggregate exercise price of a nil cost option is £1 (further detail is included on page 169). At the fifth anniversary of the provisional allocation

the nil cost options normally lapse and the shares under provisional allocation (including bonus shares) are released at the discretion of the ESAS trustee. In 2008, nil cost options were granted to Mr Varley over 91,213 shares. Nil cost options (granted in 2003) lapsed during the year. Mr Varley held 63,447 nil cost options under ESAS as at 1st January 2008, and 146,282 as at 31st December 2008. The first and last exercise dates were 13th March 2006 and 7th March 2010 respectively.


Table 4: Performance conditions attaching to the fair valueshare plans in which the executive Directors participate

Scheme

Performance

period

Performance

measure

Target

PSP

2008 -201050% of the share options granted on the dateaward calibrated against TSR33% of the grant. The costmaximum award released for above median performance (6th place) with 100% released in 1st place and a scaled basis in between
50% of the employee services received in respect of the share options granted is recognised in the income statementaward calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period that33% of maximum award released for £6,921m scaled to 100% of maximum award at £8,350m
2007-200950% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the services are received. The costthree year performance period33% of maximum award released for 2007£7,618m scaled to 100% of £54.8m (2006: £37.4m, 2005: £14.9m) is included in staff costs in Note 8maximum award at £8,668m
2006-200850% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period33% of maximum award released for £5,661m scaled to the accounts. In accordance with IFRS 2, details100% of share options granted and exercised, together with weighted average fair valuesmaximum award at grant date and weighted average exercise prices are set out in Note 44 to the accounts. In accordance with IAS 33 ‘Earnings per Share’, unexercised options are taken into account in the calculation£7,073m
2005-2007100% of diluted earnings per share as set out in Note 11 to the accounts.award calibrated against TSRAs above

162

Barclays

For Group reporting, the exercise of options by employees is treated as a deemed disposal of interests in a subsidiary, as its holding in the subsidiary has been reduced for the consideration represented by the exercise price. Any subsequent purchase of shares offered for sale by employees is treated as a purchase of an additional investment in a subsidiary entity. The cash flows relating to these capital transactions are included in the consolidated cash flow statement and disclosed, along with other disposals and acquisitions, in Note 38 to the accounts and related movements in goodwill and minority interests are included in Notes 21 and 33 to the accounts respectively.Annual Report 2008


LOGO

For PSP, at the end of each performance period, independent confirmation is provided to the Committee of the extent to which each performance condition has been met. Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and Cumulative Economic Profit (EP) were selected in 2005 as performance measures to support the Group’s long-term goals.

All awards and releases are recommended by the Committee and are subject to trustee discretion.

The trustees may also release dividend shares to participants which represent accumulated dividends (net of withholding) in respect of shares under award.

During 2008 Barclays highest share price was £5.06 and the lowest was £1.27. The share price at year end was £1.53.


Cash

released

  

Market price
on release/
exercise date

  Number
lapsed in
2008
  Adjustment
due to
open offer
  Adjusted
number of
shares under
award/option at
31st December
2008
(maximum)
  Vested
number
of shares
under option
  Value of
release/
exercise
  End of three
year PSP
performance
period, or first
exercise/
scheduled
release date
  Last
exercise/
scheduled
release date

     (426,135)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       12,360  473,604       31/12/08  21/03/09

       13,164  504,294       31/12/09  22/03/10

       21,204  812,412       31/12/10  20/03/11

       24,655  944,655  944,655     18/05/03  22/03/14

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.56    12,255  469,467    £0.1m  13/03/06  20/03/13

     (156,249)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       61,806  2,368,014       31/12/08  21/03/09

       75,138  2,878,686       31/12/09  22/03/10

       53,010  2,031,030  ��    31/12/10  20/03/11

       15,008  575,008  575,008     12/03/04  22/03/14

     (100,000)          14/08/01  13/08/08

£7.425m

             £7.42m  06/02/08  15/03/08

         100,000  100,000     26/03/07  26/03/14

  £4.56/£4.57    183,958  7,048,112    £9.74m  28/02/06  20/03/13

       6,666  255,396       31/12/09  22/03/10

       14,136  541,608       31/12/10  20/03/11

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.45    2,075  79,477    £0.16m  31/03/08  20/03/13

       12,684  485,868       31/12/08  04/08/09

       10,968  420,246       31/12/09  22/03/10

       28,272  1,083,216       31/12/10  20/03/11

       90  3,480       01/11/12  01/05/13

  £2.91    9,550  285,712    £0.23m  29/06/07  20/03/13

Mr Diamond’s Retained Incentive Opportunity (RIO) reached the end of its performance period on 31st December 2007. Vesting was based on Barclays Capital’s cumulative EP over the three-year performance period (which exceeded the £2bn threshold at which the maximum potential value would vest). This value of the RIO award was awarded 50% in cash and 50% in shares, deferred for one year under ESAS. The ESAS number shown as awarded in the year to

Mr Diamond includes the deferred share element of his Retained Incentive Opportunity (1,631,868 shares). No bonus shares are attributable to this award. The cash release made in the year is also shown in the table above.

Mr Varley and Mr Diamond received 6,047 and 172,264 dividend shares respectively from the ESAS released during the year (share price on release date was £4.56).


ReplacementTSR Peer group constituents

UKMainland EuropeUSUnderpin

Actual

performance

HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB,

Royal Bank of the BGI EOPScotland

Banco Santander,

BBVA, BNP Paribas,

Deutsche Bank, UBS

Citigroup,

JP Morgan

Chase

Cumulative EP over performance period must exceed cumulative EP over previous three years

To be determined at vesting in

March 2011

As above

As aboveTo be determined

at vesting in

March 2010

As above

As abovePerformance condition
partially met

As above

As above

TSR performance

condition not met

Barclays

The Group will introduce a new BGI employee share plan inAnnual Report 2008 under which awards will be made using

163


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Pensions

Chris Lucas and Frits Seegers receive a cash allowance of 25% of salary in lieu of joining a Group pension scheme.

John Varley is a member of the Group’s closed UK defined benefit pension scheme. This non-contributory arrangement provides a pension benefit of two thirds of his pensionable salary at the normal retirement age of 60. Should he retire at 55, an unreduced pension of 60% of pensionable salary would be provided. There were no changes to the pension arrangements for Mr Varley during the year. His increase in pension of £83,000 during the year relates to accrual under the scheme. The scheme also provides, whilst in employment, a death in service dependant’s pension of 50% of the pension that would have been payable if employment had continued until normal pension age. Mr Varley also has a defined contribution benefit of £549,816 as at 31st December 2008 in respect of a previous transfer from a freestanding AVC.

Robert E Diamond Jr participates in the Group’s US non-contributory defined benefit arrangements which provide a benefit at age 65 of 1/60th of final average pensionable pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 30 years. In line with current market practice, final average pensionable pay includes salary and an element of bonus up to a current combined maximum of US$350,000. The benefits are provided through the US defined benefit plan (a funded arrangement), and the US Restoration Plan (an unfunded arrangement). The scheme also provides a death in service spouse’s pension of approximately 50% of the pension that would have been payable had early retirement occurred on the date of death.

Mr Diamond also participates in the Barclays Bank PLC 401K Thrift Savings Plan and Thrift Restoration Plan, which are both defined contribution plans. The company contributions in 2008 amounted to £11,745 (US$21,859).

Table 5 sets out the pension benefits of the executive Directors.

Pension accrued during the year represents the change in accrued pension during the year (including inflation at the prescribed rate of 5% (U K)). Pensions paid from the UK final salary section of the applicable

fund are reviewed annually and increase by a minimum of the increase in the retail prices index (capped at 5%), subject to the scheme rules.

The transfer values have been calculated in a manner consistent with the Retirement Benefit Scheme – Transfer Values (GN11) published by the Institute of Actuaries, and the Faculty of Actuaries. During 2008, the independent UK Retirement Fund Trustee changed the transfer value basis for all members. The change reflected different mortality assumptions and a lower discount rate. This contributed £1.4m of the increase in transfer value of John Varley’s pension during the year.

Other benefits

Executive Directors are provided with benefits including private medical insurance, life and disability cover, the use of a company-owned vehicle or the cash equivalent, tax advice and accommodation overseas when required for business purposes. These benefits are available on similar terms to each executive Director. No Director has an expense allowance.

Shareholding guideline

The Committee guideline that executive Directors should hold, as a minimum, the equivalent of one times their base salary in Barclays shares, including shares awarded under ESAS, was met by all executive Directors at 31st December 2007. During the year the Committee increased this guideline to the higher of two times salary or one-third of total remuneration for the last three years. Executive Directors have five years from their appointment to meet this guideline and a reasonable period to build up to the guideline again, if it is not met because of a share price fall. Table 6 shows the executive Directors’ shareholdings. Table 7 shows the indicative change in value of the executive Directors’ total share interests during 2008.


Table 5: Pension provision

 

   

Age at 31st

December
2008

 Completed
years of
service
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st
December
2007

£000

 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(including
increase for
inflation)
£000
 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(excluding
inflation)
£000
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 

Transfer

value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2007

£000

 

Transfer
value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 Increase
in transfer
value during
the year
£000
 Annual cash
in lieu of
pension
£000

John Varley

 52 26 489 83 59 572 9,463 12,328 2,865 

Robert E Diamon Jr

 57 12 38 7 5 45 214 280 66 

Chris Lucas

 48 1        159

Frits Seegers

 50 2     

   175

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
Executive Directors        
John Varley  470,650    593,266  

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

 
    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008 
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
 
Robert E Diamond Jr  3,402,192    5,866,965   
Chris Lucas  38,003    76,038   
Frits Seegers  699,870    897,747   

Table 7: Indicative change in value of executive Director

total share interests

 
    

Indicative
value at
1st January
2008

£m

  Change in
holdings
£m
  

Indicative
value at
31st December
2008

£m

  

Indicative
decrease
on total share
interest

2008

£m

 
Executive Directors        
John Varley  7.1  1.4  2.5  (6.0)
Robert E Diamond Jr  50.9  22.3  23.5  (49.7)
Chris Lucas  1.0  1.0  0.7  (1.3)
Frits Seegers  6.2  2.6  2.8  (6.0)

Beneficial interests include shares held either directly, or through a nominee, their spouse, and children under 18. They include any interests held through Sharepurchase. Non-beneficial interests include any

interests in shares where the executive Director holds the legal, but not beneficial interest. In addition to the shares above Mr Diamond also holds 200,000 shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited. Mr Seegers has granted a third party bank security over 896,346 of the ordinary shares he holds. Mr Seegers retains beneficial ownership of these shares. He also holds 1,000 ordinary shares in Absa Group Limited. Note 45 provides further information on Directors and officers shareholdings. There were no changes to the interests of executive Directors in shares of Barclays PLC in the period 31st December 2008 to 27th February 2009.

Share interests are beneficial interests plus share plan interests including any initial or provisional allocations and vested awards under ESAS, PSP, ISOP, ESOS and Sharesave.


164

Barclays PLC shares purchased in the market. The quantum of awards will be linked to BGI business performance. Executive Directors will not be eligible to participate in the new BGI plan.

It is intended that no further options will be granted under the BGI EOP and that the BGI EOP will not be renewed in 2010 when it comes to the end of its life.Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Performance Linked Remuneration

Each element of remuneration is important and has a specific role in achieving the aims of the remuneration policy. The combined potential remuneration from annual performance bonus and PSP outweighs the other elements, and is subject to personal and Group performance, thereby placing the majority of potential remuneration at risk.

Table 8 shows the average proportions of fixed and variable pay over the last three years.

Table 8: Variable remuneration average over the last three years

(or since joining)

 

 

        Variable 
    Fixed  Cash  Shares 

Executive Directors

    

John Varley

  57% 19% 24%

Robert E Diamond Jr

  2% 39% 59%

Chris Lucas

  38% 12% 49%

Frits Seegers

  22% 25% 53%

Non-executive Directors

The Board determines the fees of non-executive Directors and the fees are reviewed annually. The fee structure as at 31st December 2007 is shown below.

David Booth

I7224

Sir Richard Broadbent (Senior Independent Director)

I721524

Leigh Clifford

I7134

Fulvio Conti

I7179

Dr Danie Cronjé (left the Board 24th April 2008)

I21

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

I72110

Sir Andrew Likierman

I71884

Sir Michael Rake

I6217

Base fee Plus:

£65,000

Chairman of Board Audit Committee

£50,000

Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee

£40,000

Chairman of Board Risk Committee

£30,000

Members of the Board Audit Committee

£20,000

Members of the following Board Committees:

Risk, HR and Remuneration and

Corporate Governance and Nominations

£15,000

As Deputy Chairman, Sir Nigel Rudd receives £200,000. (Deputy Chairman)

I7202

Stephen Russell

I6131023

Sir Nigel Rudd did not receive any additional fees for serving asJohn Sunderland

I72041

Patience Wheatcroft

I722

Key

OAIndependent on appointment
EDExecutive Director
IIndependent non-executive Director

Board Committees

Certain responsibilities of the Board are delegated to Board Committees to assist the Board in carrying out its functions and to ensure independent oversight of internal control and risk management. Membership of Board Committees is recommended to the Board by the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, which reviews Committee composition and balance regularly to ensure the Committees are refreshed. All members of principal Board Committees are non-executive Directors, although the Chairman is a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. Each Board Committee’s terms of reference set out the specific matters for which delegated authority has been given. These terms of reference, which are available on our website, are reviewed annually.

The Board has delegated authority to four principal Board Committees:

Board Audit Committee

Board Risk Committee

Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee. Sir Richard Broadbent receivesCommittee

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

The number of meetings held and attendance at the Committee meetings is set out above in ‘Board and Committee Membership and Attendance’. The activities of the Board Committees are set out on the pages 149 to 154.

The terms of reference for each of the principal Board Committees are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

Board Audit Committee

Stephen Russell (Chairman)

Fulvio Conti

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

Sir Andrew Likierman

Sir Michael Rake

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Audit Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

In addition to the members of the Committee, there are a number of regular attendees at each meeting. The Group Chief Executive, Group Finance Director, Barclays Internal Audit Director, Group Risk Director, Group General Counsel and the lead external audit partner normally attend all scheduled Board Audit Committees. The Board Audit Committee members usually meet privately before each meeting to raise any concerns with the Chairman of the meeting and they also meet with the external auditors and the Barclays Internal Audit Director, without management present, at the end of most Committee meetings. Sir Andrew Likierman continues to fulfil his role as the ‘financial expert’ as defined by the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, as a result of his accountancy background and his career with HM Treasury, has ‘recent and relevant financial experience’ as recommended by the Code. Sir Michael Rake will succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Committee in March 2009. Sir Michael has significant audit experience having worked at KPMG from 1972-2007 where he was Chairman of KPMG International from 2002-2007.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

149


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Activities in 2008

Figure 5 illustrates how the Committee allocated its time in 2008. During 2008, the Committee:

considered the information it would require during the coming year to enable it to discharge its responsibilities;

considered the significant changes in financial markets and economic conditions and the impact on the areas of focus for the Committee;

reviewed the Annual Report and Accounts and half-year Results and Interim Management Statements;

reviewed in detail the valuations of Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures, reviewing mark-to-market valuations and accounting for derivatives and assessing the overall quality of earnings;

reviewed the Group’s accounting policies and, in particular, the accounting for leveraged loans;

considered control issues of Group level significance for different areas of the business;

received reports on the control environment in each of the following businesses or functions: Barclays Wealth, Barclays Commercial Bank, Western Europe, Global Retail and Commercial Banking IT, Barclaycard, Global Payments, Emerging Markets, BGI, Absa and Barclays Capital;

reviewed the effectiveness and independence of the Group statutory auditor;

approved the re-appointment, remuneration and engagement letter of the Group statutory auditor;

considered the provision of non-audit services by the Group statutory auditor – more details can be found in the box on page 151;

received reports from the external and internal auditors;

monitored the performance of the Internal Audit function;

reviewed the Global Internal Audit Plan;

reviewed the internal control and risk management systems;

LOGO


Board Audit Committee Chairman’s Statement

We held ten meetings in 2008 and an additional £30,000overview of how we used our meetings is set out below.

Our areas of focus in respect of his role as Senior Independent Director. Marcus Agius serves2008 were dominated by the continuing disruption to the credit markets and financial services sector as a memberwhole. In early 2008, we held a separate session of the Committee on accounting for and valuation of derivatives and complex financial instruments and also reviewed the Group’s valuation methodology for these instruments. The latter comprises trading desk evaluation supported by independent price testing and benchmarking, followed by a review by Finance and Risk and by the external auditor.

When considering the Group’s preliminary and half-year results and interim management statements, we spent a significant amount of time reviewing the disclosures around and the fair value of Barclays Capital’s credit markets exposures, including asset backed securities and leveraged credit positions. As part of the approval of each results statement, we reviewed the fair value of the credit market exposures and the form and content of the disclosures. The review of the credit market exposure valuations included a review of marks by key asset categories, movements in exposures (including sales/paydowns) and a review of underlying collateral by vintage and rating. The Committee received at both the half-year and year-end and before each Interim Management Statement a specific presentation from Barclays Capital’s Chief Operating Officer and discussed the valuations with the Group Finance Director, Group Risk Director and, importantly, the Group’s external auditors. Reassurance was sought from independent Group control functions such as Risk and Finance, and the external auditors, that the individual marks were appropriate. The Committee was reassured that there were no significant variations between the prices at which assets were sold and the underlying marks. The Committee was content that the markets and models to which the valuations are marked are sufficiently robust to enable reliable and relevant valuations to be determined.

We also reviewed the controls around Barclays Capital’s complex financial instruments, as well as reviewing the overall control environment at Barclays Capital. The Committee has sought to learn lessons from events at our peers, receiving reports on the circumstances surrounding losses experienced at Société Générale and UBS. We discussed the overall impact of market conditions and the challenging financial markets on the remit of the Committee and this will help shape our agenda for 2009.

In the second half of the year, as the financial crisis started to evolve into a global economic downturn, the Committee directed increasing attention at the deepening economic downturn, reviewing the key controls by which consequent risk can be managed. As a result, impairment measurement, fraud controls, collections activities and day-to-day credit controls and security documentation are receiving increased scrutiny from the Committee. During the year we also received additional presentations and reports on the impact of the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North

American businesses in September 2008, including an initial assessment of the risks and controls in that business and a report on the impact of the acquisition on financial reporting. In reviewing the Internal Audit Plan for 2009, we also challenged management to make sure that the Internal Audit function is appropriately resourced for the challenges ahead and is directing its attention on areas likely to come under pressure in the expected downturn.

Impairment numbers continue to be closely reviewed by the Committee. It reviews a paper prepared by the Risk function, which examines impairment on a business-by-business basis. It examines closely any amendments or overrides to models, compares trends and impairment levels with peers and seeks independent reassurance from the external auditor.

Our reviews of the control environment in each of our businesses in 2008 continued to focus on those areas where the Group’s business is expanding or which are deemed to be higher risk, including Emerging Markets. We also reviewed the controls around our key regulatory programmes, in particular, Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II, and received regular reports on Sanctions compliance and Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering controls.

The internal and external auditors are evaluated annually. Feedback on both is sought from key stakeholders in the Group via questionnaires with the results being presented to and discussed by the Committee. The Committee is satisfied with the performance of both auditors. During 2009, an external assessment of the internal audit function will be undertaken. The Committee has recommended to the Board and to shareholders that PwC should be re-appointed as the Group’s auditors at the AGM on 23rd April 2009. We are fully satisfied that PwC provides effective, independent challenge to management, which has been crucial in the current difficult environment, and has provided valued support to the Committee in the advice given and the clarity of their briefings and reports. The feedback received from other stakeholders through the annual evaluation exercise has been positive.

As Chairman of the Committee, I have liaised as appropriate with the Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee, particularly to draw attention to any specific aspects of the Group’s results which I feel he ought to be aware of when determining appropriate levels of compensation.

The Committee can confirm that it received sufficient, reliable and is timely information from management to enable it to fulfil its responsibilities.

LOGO

Stephen Russell

Chairman of the Corporate GovernanceBoard Audit Committee

5th March 2009

150

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

considered the effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls over financial reporting;

received regular reports on ‘Raising Concerns’, including whistleblowing;

considered the Fraud Risk Control Framework; and Nominations Board Committee. He does not receive any fees in relation

reviewed its Terms of Reference to these appointments.satisfy itself that they enable the Committee to fulfill its responsibilities.

The Committee also received regular updates during 2008 on:

Basel II

MiFID

Sarbanes-Oxley

Sanctions compliance

In February 2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Approval of financial statements

Barclays has a strong governance process in place to support its framework of disclosure controls and procedures. That process, in which the Board Audit Committee plays a key role, is illustrated in Figure 6.

The Legal and Technical Review Committee is an accounting, legal and regulatory compliance committee, which is responsible for reviewing the Group’s financial reports and disclosures to ensure that they have been subject to adequate verification and comply with legal and technical requirements. Meetings are attended by the Group’s auditors and US lawyers. The membership of the Disclosure Committee and its role is set out on page 154. The membership of the Executive Committee and its role is set out on pages 153 and 154.

This governance process is in place to ensure both management and the Board are given sufficient opportunity to review and challenge the Group’s financial statements and other significant disclosures before they are made public. It also provides assurance for the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director when providing certifications as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and recommended by the Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control. Further details of the Group’s system of internal control and an assessment of its effectiveness may be found on page 173.

David Booth was appointed as non-executive Director with effect from 1st May 2007.Non-Audit Services Policy

The Board’sCommittee takes seriously its responsibility to put in place safeguards to auditor objectivity and independence. It has therefore established a policy is that fees should reflect individual responsibilitieson the provision of services by the Group’s statutory auditor. The Policy describes the circumstances in which the auditor may be permitted to undertake non-audit work for the Group. The Committee oversees compliance with the Policy and membershipconsiders and approves requests to use the auditor for non-audit work. Allowable services are pre-approved up to £100,000, or £10,000 in the case of Board Committees. Barclays encourages its non-executive Directors to build up a holding in Barclays shares. £20,000 of each Director’s base fee of £65,000 is used to buy Barclays shares. These shares, togethercertain taxation services. The Company Secretary and his team deal with reinvested dividends, are retained on behalfday-to-day administration of the non-executive Directors until they retire fromPolicy, facilitating requests for approval by the Board. TheyCommittee. The Committee receives a report at each meeting on the non-audit services provided by the auditor and the Policy is reviewed by the Committee annually. Details of the services that are included inprohibited and allowed are set out below.

Services that are prohibited include:

–  bookkeeping

–  design and implementation of financial information systems

–  appraisal or valuation services

–  actuarial services

–  internal audit outsourcing

–  management and Human Resource functions

–  broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services

–  legal, expert and tax services involving advocacy

Allowable services that the table of Directors’ interests in Committee will consider for approval include:

–  statutory and regulatory audit services and regulatory non-audit services

–  other attest and assurance services

–  accountancy advice and training

–  risk management and controls advice

–  transaction support

–  taxation services

–  business support and recoveries

–  translation services


LOGO

Barclays shares

Annual Report 2008

151


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Board Risk Committee

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

David Booth

Dr Danie Cronjé (to 24th April 2008)

Sir Andrew Likierman

Stephen Russell

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Risk Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

In addition to the Members of the Committee, all meetings are usually attended by the Group Finance Director and Group Risk Director. Barclays Internal Audit Director, Group General Counsel and Barclays external auditor, as well as other senior executives, also attend meetings of the Board Risk Committee, where appropriate.

The Board recognises that risk is a key parameter for the business.

The Board Risk Committee provides monitoring and oversight of all Barclays risk activities. During 2008, the Committee received presentations and updates on key aspects of the external market conditions to ensure it was able to maintain an appropriate level of oversight and report effectively to the Board.

Activities in 2008

The Committee met four times in 2008 and Figure 7 shows how the Committee allocated its time at those meetings. During 2008, the Committee:

received regular reports on, page 142. Non-executive Directors do not receive awards under share plans for employees, nor do they accrue pension benefits from Barclays for their non-executive services.

Non-executive Directors do not have service contracts but each has a letter of appointment. For each non-executive Director who served during 2007, the effective date of their appointment, notice periodand considered, Risk Appetite and the Group’s liabilityrisk profile, including key indicators for Risk Appetite, Group Impairment, Retail Credit Risk, Wholesale Credit Risk, Market Risk, Financial Crime, Operational Risk and Economic Capital;

reviewed at each meeting updates on asset backed securities and leveraged credit markets, including the Group’s exposures to sub-prime and Alt-A markets, monoline insurers and leveraged loan underwriting positions;

reviewed updates on liquidity risk;

reviewed risk trends and risk management in GRCB – Emerging Markets and South Africa;

received regular Forward Risk Trends reports, which set out the internal and external indicators that are showing signs of strain;

reviewed the internal control framework;

examined the risk control framework, and approved Group policies including the trading book policy, large exposures policy, liquidity policy, retail and wholesale credit impairment policies and the Group’s principal risks policy;

reviewed Group-wide stress testing scenarios and results;

reviewed in greater detail the process around setting annual Risk Appetite to establish the effectiveness of the process in responding to significant changes in economic and market conditions;

reviewed the programme of actions being taken Group-wide to mitigate risk in view of deteriorating economic conditions in our major markets, such as the UK, US, South Africa and Spain;

reviewed the Risk Appetite for the Group for 2009 and made recommendations to the Board; and.

received updates on Basel II.

LOGO

Board Risk Committee Chairman’s Statement

2008 was a challenging year for risk management and this was reflected in the eventwork of early termination are shownthe Committee, which is detailed below. Particular areas worthy of note were:

–  The Committee monitored the Group’s sub-prime exposures throughout the year. The reduction in limits and scale of the sub-prime business in 2007 reduced the impact of the crisis, although substantial write-downs were still required during 2008, reflecting a further deterioration in the following table.markets and underlying performance of the assets.

 

–  The Committee also monitored the Group’s exposure to other areas affected by the crisis, including other asset-backed securities, commercial mortgages and monoline insurers.

–  The Committee reviewed and compared the write-downs being taken in the sub-prime and related areas with those being taken by the industry.

–  The Committee monitored carefully the Group’s overall risk exposure in the light of the anticipated worsening in economic conditions and reviewed management plans to manage and mitigate the effects of the expected downturn in multiple markets.

–  The Committee also monitored the capital position throughout the year relative to regulatory requirements and the Group’s overall risk appetite. Several steps were taken throughout the year to strengthen the capital base prior to the events of October 2008 when the regulator changed the capital requirements for banks, requiring a further and substantial capital raising.

–  The Committee played an active role in informing Board debate about Risk Appetite and capital planning for 2009.

LOGO

Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman of the Board Risk Committee

5th March 2009

In March 2009, the Committee will review its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference.

More information on risk management and the internal control framework can be found in the Risk management report on pages 57 to 136.


152

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008

Non-executive


LOGO

Board Corporate Governance and

Nominations Committee

Marcus Agius (Chairman)

Sir Richard Broadbent

Sir Nigel Rudd

Stephen Russell

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Lawrence Dickinson

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com.

The meetings are also attended by the Group Chief Executive.

Activities in 2008

Figure 8 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2008. During 2008, the Committee:

Directorsa

reviewed Board and Board Committee composition to ensure the right mix of skills and experience are present;

Effective
date of
letter of
appointment
Notice
period
Group
liability in the
event of early
termination

David Booth

 1st May 20076 months6 months’
fees

Sir Richard Broadbent

1st Sep 2003

Leigh Clifford

1st Oct 2004

Fulvio Conti

1st Apr 2006

Dr Danie Cronjé

1st Sep 2005

Professor Dame

Sandra Dawson

1st Mar 2003

Sir Andrew Likierman

1st Sep 2004

Sir Nigel Rudd

1st Feb 1996

Stephen Russell

25th Oct 2000

Sir John Sunderland

1st Jun 2005

Sir Michael Rakemonitored the progress of the action plan arising from the 2007 Board Effectiveness Review and Patience Wheatcroft were appointed as non-executive Directors with effect from 1st January 2008.

Each appointment is for an initial six-year term, renewable for a single termoversaw the conduct of three years thereafter, with the exception of Sir Nigel Rudd, whose appointment as Deputy Chairman is reviewed annually. Details of non-executive Directors standing for re-election at the 2008 AGM are set out on page 114.Board Effectiveness Review;

Future Policyreviewed the corporate governance disclosures for the 2007 Annual Report and considered the proposed disclosures for 2008;

Thereviewed and updated Corporate Governance in Barclays and the Charter of Expectations; and

reviewed succession plans for the Executive Committee will keepand the existing remuneration arrangements, as detailed in this Report, under review during 2008 and ensure that Barclays programmes remain competitive and provide appropriate incentive for performance. As usual, there will be individual reviewsposition of base salary, annual bonus (including ESAS) and awards under Group Chief Executive.

The Committee also received updates on:

the long-term incentive plans.

Audited Information

As required by Part 3 of Schedule 7Astatus of the Companies Act 1985,2006 and, in particular, the new statutory statement of Directors’ Duties on Conflicts of Interest.

During 2008, the Committee reviewed the composition of the Board and its principal Committees at each of its meetings. Following those deliberations, the Committee recommended to the Board that Sir Michael Rake succeed Stephen Russell as Chairman of the Board Audit Committee with effect from March 2009. No new Directors were appointed to the Board during 2008, other than Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft, who joined the Board with effect from 1st January 2008.

Given that Sir Nigel Rudd and Professor Dame Sandra Dawson will be retiring from the Board at the 2009 AGM and Stephen Russell will be retiring in October 2009 on completion of nine years’ service, the Committee also discussed both Board size and future Board composition and, in particular, given the continuing crisis in the world financial services industry, the type of skills and experience required in new non-executive Directors.

In early 2009, the Committee concluded that a non-executive Director with experience of institutional fund management should be sought and, with the assistance of external search consultants, Simon Fraser was identified as a candidate with the desired experience. He met with members of the Board Corporate Governance & Nominations Committee and his appointment was recommended to the Board, who approved his appointment as a Director. Simon will join the Board on 10th March 2009, subject to regulatory approvals.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into between Barclays and China Development Bank (CDB) in August 2007 for the subscription of Barclays ordinary shares, CDB retain the right to nominate a non-executive Director to the Board of Barclays but did not take up this right during 2008.

In January 2009, the Committee reviewed its activities in 2008 against its terms of reference and concluded that it had discharged the responsibilities delegated to it under those terms of reference.

Board HR and Remuneration Committee

Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman)

Marcus Agius

Leigh Clifford

Sir John Sunderland

Secretary: Patrick Gonsalves

The Board HR and Remuneration Committee terms of reference are available from the Corporate Governance section at:www.aboutbarclays.com

Additional information on the role and activities of the Committee can be found in the Remuneration Report on pages 157 to 173, including the Group’s revised philosophy on remuneration, an explanation of the Group’s remuneration arrangements and a description of the framework for future decisions in this area.

Activities in 2008

Figure 9 shows how the Committee allocated its time at its meetings in 2008. The Committee held additional meetings in November 2008 and January 2009, as a result of the rapidly changing economic environment and the intense scrutiny from regulators and other interested parties that the issue of remuneration has received.

During 2008 the Committee:

continued to review the compensation frameworks in place for each area of the Group;

reviewed executive compensation;

reviewed the Group’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have auditedapproach to remuneration in light of market conditions;

approved the information containedPensions Strategy and other pension matters;

reviewed global staff benefits;

monitored the implementation of the talent agenda;

reviewed the Group’s Health and Safety and Diversity and Inclusion performance;

considered incentive funding for 2008 for each main business area;

reviewed, current and future, Group and business long-term incentive arrangements; and

held discussions with external advisers to the Committee on pages 135a range of issues, including obtaining market data on remuneration levels in specified markets.

The Committee received valuable support and advice from its independent advisers, Towers Perrin MGMC and Kepler Associates.

Management

Executive Committee

Under the leadership of the Group Chief Executive, the executive Directors are responsible for managing the Group’s business and making and executing operational decisions. The Executive Committee supports the Group Chief Executive and it meets every fortnight to discuss strategy development and policies to recommend to the Board. The Executive Committee is also responsible for implementing approved strategy and is supported by other Committees, including the Disclosure Committee.


LOGO

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

153


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Executive Committee

John Varley (Chairman)

Bob Diamond

Chris Lucas

Frits Seegers

Disclosure Committee

The Disclosure Committee is chaired by Chris Lucas, the Group Finance Director. Members include the Company Secretary, Group General Counsel, Director, Investor Relations, Group Risk Director, Barclays Corporate Affairs Director, Group Financial Controller and Barclays Treasurer. The Committee:

considers and reviews the preliminary and half-year results, Annual Report/Annual Report on Form 20F and the Annual Review; and

considers Interim Management Statements released to 141.the Stock Exchange.

The Committee also considers the content, accuracy and tone of significant other announcements that are proposed to be made in accordance with the FSA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

The Committee reports to the Executive Committee and also reports to the Board Audit Committee, documenting its conclusions about the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures. This forms part of the combined assurance given to the

Board Audit Committee together with the report on the Turnbull Review of Internal Controls recommended by the Code.

Board Effectiveness

Performance Review

The Code recommends that an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees is conducted annually. The evaluation in 2007 was independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International. All Directors were sent a questionnaire to complete and return to Egon Zehnder International and these were discussed in individual interviews, which included peer review. The following actions were agreed for 2008:

minor enhancements around the form and content of Board papers and presentations; and

refining the Board calendar of business.

The 2008 evaluation was again independently facilitated by Egon Zehnder International and took the form of detailed questionnaires, which were completed by each Director, individual interviews and peer evaluation of fellow Directors. As in previous years, the evaluation covered the following areas:

Group performance;

Strategy and performance objectives;

Reporting to shareholders/stakeholders;

Structure, people, succession planning and remuneration;

Decision-making process;

Information flows;

Board structure and composition;

Board roles and responsibilities;

Board and Management relationships;

Board meetings; and

Board Committees.

The results of the evaluation were presented to the Board in December 2008. The results from the overall review showed a continuation of the five-year trend of improving scores and the Board concluded that the Board and the principal Board Committees continue to operate effectively in terms of communication, information flows and Directors’ participation and engagement, particularly during the period of difficult market conditions in 2008. The Directors recognised however, and were disappointed, that Group performance has not met shareholder expectations and acknowledged that they are accountable to shareholders for their stewardship of the Group during the exceptional events of 2008.

From the results of the 2008 evaluation, action points and issues that were discussed included:

continued focus on the Board’s calendar of business to ensure that non-critical items are removed or kept to a minimum, thereby ensuring that sufficient time can be allocated to items fundamental to the success of the Group;

refinements to the Board’s calendar of business, including additional time to be spent on items such as compensation strategy and succession planning;

the overall size and composition of the Board; and

refinements to the process for evaluating the performance of individual Directors.

The Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee has agreed an action plan to progress improvements in 2009.

In terms of individual Director performance, the Group Chairman held private meetings with non-executive Directors in early 2009 so that individual and general results could be discussed. Development plans relating to their own individual performance were agreed. The Senior Independent Director met privately with the other non-executive Directors and the Group Chief Executive to discuss feedback he received on the Group Chairman’s performance. These results were then shared with the Group Chairman.

Director Development and Business Awareness

A comprehensive development and awareness programme is in place for Directors. This comprises:

an induction programme, when they join the Board;

briefings on the business of Barclays; and

briefings on external technical matters.

Induction

All new Directors receive an induction presentation, which explains their responsibilities as a Director of a global, listed company and provides an overview of the Group and its businesses. An information pack, that gives details of the disclosures that Directors are obliged to make to the Company to comply with various laws and regulations, is also provided to each new Director. A personal induction programme is scheduled with each new Director so that they can further acquaint themselves with the Group and its businesses. Each new Director attends sessions with each of the executive Directors and the heads of the main Group functions, which includes opportunities to visit operational sites to meet with senior management and employees. The second part of their induction programme includes additional sessions with the executive Directors and senior managers from each of the Group’s main business units to provide the new Director with detailed and in-depth understanding of those businesses. The sessions focus on the challenges, opportunities and risks that are faced by each business unit. Sir Michael Rake and Patience Wheatcroft undertook their induction programmes during 2008.

In 2008, non-executive Directors were asked to complete a questionnaire and give feedback on topics on which they would like to receive additional briefings. Two in-depth briefing sessions were arranged during 2008 on impairment recognition and forecasting and on Barclays Capital’s traded products, including asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and collateralised debt obligations.

The Board and the Board Audit and Board Risk Committees received further briefings to ensure they were kept up to date with the changing global economic conditions, including updates on capital management, presentations on asset-backed securities and liquidity risk, mark-to-market valuations and briefing material to support the various capital raising proposals and acquisition of the Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

Barclays businesses and operations

During 2008, one Board meeting was held off-site. The Board met in China in September and received presentations on the economic and political outlook in China and met key Barclays staff working in the Asia-Pacific region.


 

Note

aMarcus Agius was a non-executive Director during 2006 and became Group Chairman on 1st January 2007. Details of his letter of appointment are set out on page 130.

154

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008

134


LOGO

Group Chief Executive, John Varley, helped to launch UK National Branch Week by visiting the Coventry High Street branch. During the course of the week, around 400 senior executives from the Group went back to the floor to experience first hand the successes and challenges colleagues in the branches are facing. Each day had a theme including raising the profile of Barclays product range, employee benefits, the importance of customer service, personal development and charity fundraising. A number of Directors participated and worked alongside cashiers, personal bankers and co-ordinators for the day.

John Varley also spent time giving presentations to colleagues on the Group’s capital raising proposals. He kept colleagues up to date on how market conditions were affecting Barclays and the decisions the Board was taking in respect of the capital raising options that were available. All colleagues were invited to attend the presentations in person or via conference call and John Varley answered questions raised by colleagues from around the world.

External matters

Directors are regularly briefed on market opinion and receive copies of analyst research and press commentary. Further briefing material on market conditions was sent to Directors during 2008 and Directors continue to receive relevant publications to keep them up to date with changing market opinion. Directors are invited to attend results presentations to meet with analysts and investors to enhance their awareness of market sentiment.

Statement on US Corporate Governance Standards

The statement required by NYSE is set out below.

Director independence

NYSE Rules require the majority of the Board to be independent.

The Code requires at least half of the Board (excluding the Chairman) to be independent. The NYSE Rules contain detailed tests for determining whether a Director is independent, whereas the Code requires the Board to determine whether each Director is independent in character and judgement and sets out criteria that may be relevant to that determination. We follow the Code’s recommendations as well as developing best practices among other UK public companies. The independence of our non-executive Directors is reviewed by the Board on an annual basis and it takes into account the guidance in the Code and the criteria we have established for determining independence, which are described on pages 147 and 148.

Board Committees

We have a Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and a Board HR and Remuneration (rather than Compensation) Committee, both of which are broadly similar in purpose and constitution to the Committees required by the NYSE Rules and whose terms of reference comply with the Code’s requirements. As the Group Chairman was independent on appointment, the Code permits him to chair the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee and be a member of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee. Except for these appointments, both Committees are composed solely of non-executive Directors, whom the Board has determined to be independent. We follow the Code recommendation that a majority of the Nominations Committee should be independent non-executive Directors, whereas the NYSE Rules state that the Committee must be composed entirely of independent Directors. We comply with the NYSE Rules regarding the obligation to have a Board Audit Committee that meets the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act, including the requirements relating to the independence of Committee members. In April 2008, we made an Annual Written Affirmation of our compliance with these requirements to the NYSE. The Code also requires us to have a Board Audit Committee comprised solely of independent non-executive Directors. However, we follow the Code recommendations, rather than the NYSE Rules regarding the responsibilities of the Board Audit Committee, although both are broadly comparable. We also have a Board Risk Committee, comprised of independent non-executive Directors, which considers and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE Rules require domestic US companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. There is no equivalent recommendation in the Code but the Board Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee has developed corporate governance guidelines, ‘Corporate Governance in Barclays’, which have been approved and adopted by the Board.

Code of Ethics

The NYSE Rules require that domestic US companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors, officers and employees. Rather than a single consolidated code as envisaged in the NYSE Rules, we have a number of ‘values based’ business conduct and ethics policies which apply to all employees. In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Group Chief Executive and senior financial officers as required by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shareholder approval of equity-compensation plans

The NYSE listing standards require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. We comply with UK requirements, which are similar to the NYSE standards. However, the Board does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition of what are considered ‘material revisions’.

Relations with Shareholders

Institutional investors

A key priority for the Board in 2008 was communicating with shareholders, particularly ahead of the General Meeting in November 2008, and also afterwards in order to provide further details to shareholders on the key decision points during the capital raising process. In the normal course of events, the Board aims to keep shareholders up to date and informed about how the Company is performing and its strategy, whilst ensuring that it listens to the opinions of major shareholders and takes their views on board. Executive Directors and senior executives hold group and one to one meetings with major investors to ensure we are communicating effectively. Analyst research notes are distributed to Directors and our corporate brokers provide regular feedback to the Board. The Investor Relations team organise roadshows, seminars, conferences, presentations and other activities that enable the Directors to interact with investors. The Group Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary conduct a series of meetings with the corporate governance representatives of our major institutional shareholders ahead of each AGM. Meetings were held with our major institutional shareholders to discuss the capital raising proposals.

Private shareholders

The Board has also tried to keep private shareholders up to date with information about the capital raising proposals during 2008. In June 2008, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders regarding the Open Offer, which took place in July. Personalised forms were also sent to shareholders with a question and answer booklet to help explain the details of the Open Offer and how to complete the forms. Further documents were available on the Group’s website and sent to shareholders on request. In November, the Group Chairman sent a letter to shareholders and Notice of General Meeting, which set out the details of the Capital Raising that required shareholder approval. A follow-up letter was also sent to shareholders to inform them of developments and to advise shareholders that all Directors would offer themselves for re-election at the 2009 AGM and that the executive Directors had all agreed to waive their bonus for 2008. An open letter to shareholders, clients, customers and colleagues from the Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive was released to the London Stock Exchange on 26th January 2009 ahead of the publication of the annual results announcement on 9th February 2009.

The change in the law that allows us to communicate electronically with shareholders has enabled us to use less paper, which benefits the environment and lowers distribution costs for the Group. All shareholder documents are available electronically as soon as they are published but shareholders can still receive communications in paper format if they wish. This year we will continue to post the Annual Review, Notice of Meeting and proxy forms to all shareholders.

We encourage shareholders to hold their shares in Barclays Sharestore, where shares are held electronically in a cost-effective and secure environment. Shareholders can use our e-view service to receive their shareholder documents electronically and they can also use this service to get immediate access to information relating to their personal shareholding and dividend history. E-view participants can also change their details and dividend mandates online and receive dividend tax vouchers electronically.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

155


Corporate governance

Corporate governance report

Annual General Meeting/General Meeting

The 2008 AGM was held on 24th April 2008 at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. In accordance with best practice, all resolutions were considered on a poll and the results were made available on our website the same day. 52.9% of the shares in issue were voted and all resolutions were approved. All Directors are encouraged to attend the AGM and are available to answer shareholder questions. All Directors attended the 2008 AGM, with the exception of Dr Danie Cronjé, who was retiring from the Board on that day. A class meeting of ordinary shareholders was also held on 24th April 2008 for shareholders to consider the resolution of the AGM that created new preference share classes. 50.5% of the shares in issue were voted and the resolution was approved by shareholders.

A general meeting (GM) was held on 24th November 2008, at ExCel London, where shareholders were asked to approve resolutions in connection with the Capital Raising proposals. 60.8% of the shares in issue were voted on a poll and all resolutions were approved. The results of the poll were made available on our website on the same day. The Group Chairman, all of the executive Directors and four non-executive Directors, including the Senior Independent Director, Deputy Chairman and Board Audit Committee Chairman, attended the GM.

The 2009 AGM will be held on 23rd April 2009 at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in London. The Notice of Meeting is enclosed with this Annual Report as a separate document. The resolutions will be considered on a poll and the results will be available on our website on 23rd April 2009.

Signed on behalf of the Board

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

5th March 2009


156

Barclays 

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Statement from the Chairman of the Board HR and Remuneration Committee

Context

The disruption in the capital markets that commenced in 2007 deepened in 2008 resulting in one of the most challenging years ever for the global financial services sector. As 2008 closed it was clear that the depth of the financial crisis was so severe that a significant global economic downturn was unavoidable. The extent to which remuneration structures may have played a role in contributing to the financial crisis was still being debated and under scrutiny as this statement was written. Whatever outcomes prevail it is certain the remuneration structures will be different in the future.

As a consequence of events, the Committee commenced its deliberations for the 2008 performance year earlier than usual and met more times than is typical. The agenda rapidly developed into two work streams: first, the immediate decisions for 2008; and, second, the long-term shape of remuneration. Work continues on the latter and will extend into 2009. Our guiding principle throughout all decisions has been ‘pay for performance’.

2008

Barclays delivered profit of £6,077m, 14% lower than 2007. Although profitability, on an absolute and relative basis, compares favourably across the sector, several features of performance resulted in a more severe reduction in variable remuneration:

1.The significant under performance of the share price and the absolute reduction in market capitalisation (£20bn in 2008)

2.The decision not to pay a final dividend for 2008

3.The significantly lower absolute performance and weaker earnings in Barclays Capital

The variable pay for the Group reduced 48% relative to 2007. Accountability rests at the most senior levels and key factors relating to executive Directors include:

zero annual performance bonus for 2008

 

no salary increases for 2009

executive Directors who have long-term performance shares due to be released in 2009 shall agree that these be deferred for a further two years and subject to additional financial performance over that period.

the total 2009 long-term awards are 64% lower than last year, with no awards for the Chief Executive and President.

An assessment of Barclays remuneration structures and how well the calibration had worked during this stressed period shows significant alignment with shareholders:

the existing long-term performance share plan award cycles (2007/09 and 2008/10) are not expected to vest

the cumulative effect of delivering significant proportions of remuneration in Barclays shares (which are typically held on a long- term basis) has resulted in the executive Directors’ share interests decreasing in value by an aggregate of £63m in 2008, which when added to the decrease of £32m in 2007 totals £95m for the two year period

the value of employee interests in shares under Barclays employee share plans has decreased over 2007 and 2008 by approximately £2bn.

Future of Remuneration

The Committee commenced a review of remuneration during 2008. The objective of the review was to assess how the pay for performance culture and alignment with shareholders could be strengthened further. As the review advanced it became clear that the mandate ought to be extended to incorporate a broader industry wide review of remuneration. So far the Committee has:

revised the remuneration policy (see page 158) to accentuate risk management and the role of behaviours in the determination of remuneration

increased the shareholding requirements for executive Directors (from 1x to the higher of 2x times base salary or average total annual cash compensation over the prior three years)

announced a new plan in the first quarter of 2009 for approximately 15,000 employees to significantly increase the proportion of remuneration paid over multiple years.

The review is continuing and will address detailed remuneration plans and proposals which will be developed during 2009. The challenge for the industry is to use this period to develop robust remuneration structures that balance commercial enterprise with risk in the interests of all stakeholders.

Barclays will be engaged in extensive dialogue and consultation with shareholders in developing its new proposals. An update on progress will be provided at the AGM.

Report

The following report of the Committee provides further explanation of the current remuneration governance and arrangements for executive Directors and is divided into the following sections:

Committee remit, members and advisers

Remuneration policy and governance

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Non-executive Directors’ remuneration

Former Directors’ remuneration

Share plan descriptions

The Committee unanimously recommends that you vote at the 2009 AGM to approve the Remuneration Report as all Directors will be doing with their own Barclays shares.

On behalf of the Board

LOGO
Sir Richard Broadbent
Chairman, Board HR and Remuneration Committee
5th March 2009

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

157


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Board HR and Remuneration Committee remit and membership

The Committee provides governance and strategic oversight of executive and all other employee remuneration, Barclays Human Resource activities and senior management development. The Committee’s terms of reference are available in the Corporate Governance section of the websitehttp://www.aboutbarclays.com. The Committee met formally five times during 2008. After each formal meeting the Chairman of the Committee presented a report to the full Board. A report on the Committee’s activities is set out on page 153 as part of the Corporate Governance Report.

The members of the Committee, are Sir Richard Broadbent (Chairman), Marcus Agius (Group Chairman), Leigh Clifford and Sir John Sunderland.

The non-executive Directors who are Committee members are considered by the Board to be independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could materially affect the exercise of their independent judgement.

Advisers

The Committee’s work is supported by independent professional advice. The Committee reviews the appointment of advisers each year. Towers Perrin MGMC and Kepler Associates were both re-appointed by the Committee in 2008. Deloitte LLP also advised the Committee. Any potential conflicts of interest the advisers may have are disclosed to the Committee. In addition to advising the Committee, Towers Perrin MGMC provided remuneration benchmarking data and Deloitte LLP and its affiliates also provided remuneration benchmarking data, tax, regulatory, information technology risk, pensions , corporate finance and consulting services to the Barclays Group.

The Group Chief Executive, the Human Resources Director and, as necessary, members of the Executive Committee, also advise the Committee, supported by their teams. No employee of Barclays Group is permitted to participate in discussions or decisions of the Committee relating to their own remuneration.

Remuneration Policy

During the year the Committee revised the Barclays Remuneration Policy. The revised policy is to:

1. Attract and retain those people with the ability, experience and skill to deliver the strategy.

2. Create a direct and recognisable alignment between the rewards and risk exposure of shareholders and employees, particularly executive Directors and senior management.

3. Incentivise employees to deliver sustained performance consistent with strategic goals and appropriate risk management, and to reward success in this.

4. Deliver compensation that is affordable and appropriate in terms of value allocated to shareholders and employees.

5. Encourage behaviour consistent with the principles that guide Barclays business:

i)Winning together

Doing what is right for Barclays, its teams and colleagues, to achieve collective and individual success.

ii)Best People

Developing talented colleagues and differentiating compensation to reflect performance.

Doing what is needed to ensure a leading position in the global financial services industry.

iii)Customer and Client Focus

Understanding what customers and clients want and need and then serving them brilliantly.

Executive Directors’ remuneration – alignment of interests with shareholders

Figure 1 shows the aggregate total direct remuneration of the executive Directors for 2007 and 2008 (as shown in Table 1) compared to the indicative fair value movements on the executive Directors’ aggregate share based remuneration and beneficial interests in Barclays shares from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2008 (as shown in Table 7). The performance of Barclays share price has been shown for context. The chart shows that the executive Directors’ interests have decreased in value by £95m over 2007 and 2008 as a consequence of the movement in Barclays share price.

LOGO


158

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

iv)Pioneering

LOGODriving new ideas, especially those that make Barclays profitable and improve control.

Improving operational excellence.

Adding diverse skills to stimulate new perspectives and bold steps.

v)Trusted

Acting with the highest levels of integrity to retain the trust of customers, shareholders, other external stakeholders and colleagues.

Taking full responsibility for decisions and actions.

Reflecting the operation of independent, robust and evidence-based governance and control and complying with relevant legal and regulatory requirements.

The Committee keeps the remuneration policy and arrangements, as detailed in this Report, under review to ensure that Barclays programmes remain competitive and provide appropriate incentive for performance.

Remuneration Policy Governance

To ensure appropriate operation of the remuneration policy, the Committee has established frameworks for the governance of remuneration in the Global Retail and Commercial Banking and Investment Banking and Investment Management businesses and for the Group as a whole. These frameworks will be reviewed in 2009. The current frameworks set out key financial ratios

achieved by Barclays and its competitors and have been used by the Committee to inform its decision-making process when approving aggregate remuneration spend, including bonus and long-term incentive expenditure, strategic investment for new hires, and the remuneration arrangements of any employee with annual total remuneration equal to or in excess of £750,000.

For all individual remuneration decisions made by the Committee, including those for executive Directors, the Committee reviews each element of remuneration relative to performance and to the practice of other comparable organisations. Remuneration is benchmarked against the markets in which we compete for talent. This includes benchmarking against other leading international banks and financial services organisations, and other companies of similar size to Barclays in the FTSE 100 Index.

Given the materiality of Barclays pension arrangements, the Committee operates a specific framework for the management of pensions to ensure proper oversight. The Global Retirement Fund Governance Framework is operated to ensure best practice in respect of regulatory compliance, governance, investment and administration. Details of the pension arrangements in place for executive Directors are set out on page 164 and for other employees on page 160.

As required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A of the Companies Act 1985, the Group’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have audited the information contained in Tables 1b, 3, 5, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 on pages 162 to 168.

Total Shareholder Return

Figure 2 shows the value, at 31st December 2008, of £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 100 Index. The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. The FTSE 100 Index is a widely recognised performance comparison for large UK companies and this is why it has been chosen as a comparator to illustrate Barclays TSR. The graph shows that, at the end of 2008, a hypothetical £100 invested in Barclays on 31st December 2003 would have generated a total loss of £59, compared with a gain of £18 if invested in the FTSE 100 Index.

LOGO


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

159


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Executive Director’s Pay

Table 1 explains the purpose of each element of remuneration and shows executive Directors’ remuneration for 2008 and 2007.

Base Salaries

The executive Directors will receive no base salary increase in 2009.

 

2007 Annual RemunerationaTable 2: Base salary

    Base salary at
31st Dec 2008
£000
  Base salary at
1st April 2009
£000
  Date of
previous
increase
Executive Directors         

John Varley

  1,100  1,100  1st April 2008

Robert E Diamond Jr

  250  250  1st March 1999

Chris Lucas

  650  650  1st April 2008

Frits Seegers

  700  700  n/a

 

   Salary
and
fees
£000
  Benefitsb
£000
  

Annual
cash

bonus

£000

  

2007

Total

£000

  

2006

Total

£000

            

Group Chairman

          

Marcus Agiusc

  750  1    751  22

Executive Directors

          

John Varleyd

  975  18  1,425  2,418  2,516

Robert E Diamond Jrd,e

  250  14  6,500  6,764  10,692

Gary Hoffmand

  625  15  506  1,146  1,108

Chris Lucasf

  450  135  450  1,035  

Frits Seegersd,g

  700  199  1,313  2,212  1,630

Non-executive Directorsh

               

David Boothi

  43      43  

Sir Richard Broadbent

  180      180  147

Leigh Clifford

  80      80  76

Fulvio Conti

  85      85  54

Dr Danie Cronjé

  217      217  326

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

  85      85  81

Sir Andrew Likierman

  100      100  96

Sir Nigel Rudd

  200      200  200

Stephen Russell

  145      145  137

Sir John Sunderland

  95      95  81

Former Director

               

Naguib Kherajd,j

  175  44  438  657  2,565

Forthcoming ESAS and PSP awardsk

 

       

Mandatory
ESAS – 2007
results

£000

  March 2008
PSP – value
of shares
under initial
allocation
£000
  

Mandatory
ESAS – 2006
results

£000

  March 2007
PSP – value
of shares
under initial
allocation
£000
            

Executive Directors

          

John Varley

    618  1,200  699  1,200

Robert E Diamond Jrl

    11,375  3,000  4,518  6,850

Gary Hoffman

    219  625  203  625

Chris Lucas

    195  800    600

Frits Seegers

     569  1,600  520  1,000

NotesTable 1a: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

aEmoluments include amounts, if any, payable by subsidiary undertakings. Amounts payable to Dr Danie Cronjé include an amount of ZAR1,926,400 (£136,774) in respect of his Chairmanship of Absa Group Limited from which he retired on 31st July 2007 (2006: ZAR3,114,800 (£249,829)
ElementPurposeDeliveryProgramme summaryWhen normally received/
awarded
SalaryTo reflect the market value of the individual and their role

–   Cash

–   Monthly

–   Pensionable

–   Reviewed annually, with any increases typically effective on 1st April

Paid in year
Annual performance bonus (cash)To incentivise the delivery of annual goals at the Group, business division and individual levels

–   No more than 75% of annual performance bonus paid in cash

–   At least 25% recommended as deferred share awards under ESAS

–   Non-pensionable

–   Based on annual business unit performance, performance of the Group as a whole and individual contribution

Normally paid in the following financial year
Total cashSub-total of the above
Deferred share award (ESAS)To align annual performance with shareholder value and increase retention

–   At least 25% of annual performance bonus recommended as deferred share awards under ESAS

–   Non-pensionable

–   Discretionary awards of shares to be deferred for three to five years. No performance condition on release, as a deferred share award

–   20% bonus shares releasable after three years, a further 10% after five years

–   Dividends normally accumulated during deferral period

Normally awarded in the following financial year
Long-term incentive (PSP)To reward the creation of above median, sustained growth in shareholder value and Economic Profit (EP) performance

–   Annual awards of shares that vest after three years, subject to performance conditions

–   Non-pensionable

–   Discretionary awards

–   Participation reviewed annually

–   Barclays performance over three years determines the performance shares eligible for release to each individual

Normally awarded in the following financial year
Total direct remunerationTotal of the above
Pension (or cash allowance)To provide a market competitive post-retirement benefit

–   Deferred cash or cash allowance

–   Monthly

–   Non-contributory, defined benefit scheme and/or defined contribution scheme, or cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions

Paid or accrued during year
Other benefitsTo provide market competitive benefits

–   Benefit in kind, or cash allowance

–   Non-pensionable

–   Benefits include private medical, insurance life and disability cover, accommodation overseas when required for business purposes, use of company owned vehicle or cash equivalent and tax advice

Received during year
Sub-total in accordance with Companies Act 1985Total of Salary, Annual Cash Bonus, Other Benefits and Pension Cash Allowance

160

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Annual Cash Bonus and Deferred Share Awards

No annual cash bonuses or deferred share awards have been awarded to executive Directors for 2008. The maximum bonus opportunity for executive Directors is normally 250%, but is tailored to the relevant market.

Long-term incentives

PSP Vesting in 2008

The PSP awards made in 2005, due for release in March 2008 lapsed in full as the performance condition was not met.

As disclosed in the 2007 Report and Accounts, in March 2008 Robert E Diamond Jr received a cash payment of £7.425m and an award of shares deferred for one year under ESAS of £7.425m, detailed on pages 162 to 163 from the Retained Incentive Opportunity 2005-2007 in which he participated.

PSP awards due to vest in 2009

For the PSP awards made in relation to the 2006-2008 cycle, the TSR condition was not met and the EP condition was partially met. As a result, awards that are scheduled to vest in March 2009 (at the absolute discretion of the PSP trustee) are due to vest at 1.4 75 times the initial award (maximum is 3 times). This represents approximately 9% of the maximum value of the number of shares that could vest at the share price at award.

After consultation with the Remuneration Committee, the executive Directors intend to write to the PSP trustee to request that it defers the exercise of its discretion to re lease shares to them under the 2006-2008 awards for a further two year period. At the end of that period it is intended that the PSP trustee considers the re lease of the shares, subject to continued employment and a financial performance condition to be agreed and assessed by the Committee.

The maximum number of shares re leasable at the end of the two year period will be 1.475 times the initial award; there will be no opportunity to receive shares in excess of this number (except for any dividend shares that may be awarded at the PSP trustee’s discretion).

Proposed awards in 2009

It is proposed that Chris Lucas and Frits Seegers are awarded a performance share plan award in 2009.

The number of shares awarded to date and the performance conditions relating to each award are set out on pages 162 and 163.

The PSP awards are shown in Table 1b at the fair value of the re commended awards.


 

 

Table 1b: Executive Directors’ annual remuneration

    John Varley  Robert E Diamond Jr  Chris Lucas  Frits Seegers
   

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

  

2008

£000

  

2007

£000

                

Salary

  1,075  975  250  250  638  450  700  700

Annual performance bonus (cash)

  0  1,425  0  6,500  0  450  0  1,313

Total cash

  1,075  2,400  250  6,750  638  900  700  2,013

Deferred share award (ESAS)

  0  618  0  11,375  0  195  0  569

Fair value of long- term incentive (PSP) award

  0  1,200  0  3,000  800  800  1,600  1,600

Total direct remuneration

  1,075  4,218  250  21,125  1,438  1,895  2,300  4,182

Pension (or cash allowance)

  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  Member of
pension
scheme.
See page 164
  159  113  175  175

Other benefits

  23  18  66  14  18  22  27  24

Sub-total in accordance with Companies Act 1985

  1,098  2,418  316  6,764  815  1,035  902  2,212

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

161


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Share Plans

Barclays operates a number of share plans to align the interests of executive Directors with shareholders. The following tables summarise the interests of each executive Director in each plan and the relevant performance conditions for outstanding PSP cycles. The interests shown are the maximum number of shares that may be received under each plan. Executive Directors do not pay for any share plan award.

During 2008, the number of shares under each award or option has been increased in accordance with the rules by 2.68% and option exercise prices per share have been correspondingly reduced to reflect the impact of the capital raising in July. No other adjustments were made for capital raisings during the year.

Summary descriptions of principal share plans operated by Barclays are shown on pages 169-172.


Table 3: Long-term plans and deferred share plans                
    Number of
shares under
award/option
1st January 2008
(maximum)
  Awarded in
year (maximum)
  Market
price on
award date
  Adjusted
weighted
average
exercise price
  Number
released/
exercised
 

John Varley

          

PSP 2005-2007

  426,135    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  461,244    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  491,130    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    791,208  £4.25      

ISOP

  920,000       £4.29   

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  344,711  135,715  £4.25     (23,214)

Robert E Diamond Jr

          

PSP 2005-2007

  156,249    £5.30      

PSP 2006-2008

  2,306,208    £6.75      

PSP 2007-2009

  2,803,548    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,978,020  £4.25      

ISOP

  560,000       £4.42   

ESOS

  100,000       £3.97   

RIO cash release

             

BGI EOP

  100,000       £20.11   

ESAS

  4,863,749  4,131,868  £4.25     (2,131,463)

Chris Lucas

          

PSP 2007-2009

  248,730    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    527,472  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,638       £4.70   

ESAS

  69,091  42,857  £4.25     (34,546)

Frits Seegers

          

PSP 2006-2008

  473,184    £6.30      

PSP 2007-2009

  409,278    £7.08      

PSP 2008-2010

    1,054,944  £4.25      

Sharesave

  3,390       £4.70   

ESAS

  231,383  125,000  £4.25     (80,221)

Numbers shown for ESAS above represent provisional allocations that have been awarded. Numbers shown as aggregate ESAS amounts also include shares under option as at 31st December 2008. Nil cost options are normally granted under mandatory ESAS awards at the third anniversary of grant and are exercisable (over initial allocation and two-thirds of bonus shares) typically for two years. The aggregate exercise price of a nil cost option is £1 (further detail is included on page 169). At the fifth anniversary of the provisional allocation

the nil cost options normally lapse and the shares under provisional allocation (including bonus shares) are released at the discretion of the ESAS trustee. In 2008, nil cost options were granted to Mr Varley over 91,213 shares. Nil cost options (granted in 2003) lapsed during the year. Mr Varley held 63,447 nil cost options under ESAS as at 1st January 2008, and 146,282 as at 31st December 2008. The first and last exercise dates were 13th March 2006 and 7th March 2010 respectively.


Table 4: Performance conditions attaching to the share plans in which the executive Directors participate

Scheme

Performance

period

Performance

measure

Target

PSP

2008 -201050% of award calibrated against TSR33% of maximum award released for above median performance (6th place) with 100% released in 1st place and a scaled basis in between
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period33% of maximum award released for £6,921m scaled to 100% of maximum award at £8,350m
2007-200950% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period33% of maximum award released for £7,618m scaled to 100% of maximum award at £8,668m
2006-200850% of award calibrated against TSRAs above
50% of award calibrated against Cumulative EP over the three year performance period33% of maximum award released for £5,661m scaled to 100% of maximum award at £7,073m
2005-2007100% of award calibrated against TSRAs above

162

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

For PSP, at the end of each performance period, independent confirmation is provided to the Committee of the extent to which each performance condition has been met. Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and Cumulative Economic Profit (EP) were selected in 2005 as performance measures to support the Group’s long-term goals.

All awards and releases are recommended by the Committee and are subject to trustee discretion.

The trustees may also release dividend shares to participants which represent accumulated dividends (net of withholding) in respect of shares under award.

During 2008 Barclays highest share price was £5.06 and the lowest was £1.27. The share price at year end was £1.53.


Cash

released

  

Market price
on release/
exercise date

  Number
lapsed in
2008
  Adjustment
due to
open offer
  Adjusted
number of
shares under
award/option at
31st December
2008
(maximum)
  Vested
number
of shares
under option
  Value of
release/
exercise
  End of three
year PSP
performance
period, or first
exercise/
scheduled
release date
  Last
exercise/
scheduled
release date

     (426,135)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       12,360  473,604       31/12/08  21/03/09

       13,164  504,294       31/12/09  22/03/10

       21,204  812,412       31/12/10  20/03/11

       24,655  944,655  944,655     18/05/03  22/03/14

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.56    12,255  469,467    £0.1m  13/03/06  20/03/13

     (156,249)          31/12/07  16/06/08

       61,806  2,368,014       31/12/08  21/03/09

       75,138  2,878,686       31/12/09  22/03/10

       53,010  2,031,030  ��    31/12/10  20/03/11

       15,008  575,008  575,008     12/03/04  22/03/14

     (100,000)          14/08/01  13/08/08

£7.425m

             £7.42m  06/02/08  15/03/08

         100,000  100,000     26/03/07  26/03/14

  £4.56/£4.57    183,958  7,048,112    £9.74m  28/02/06  20/03/13

       6,666  255,396       31/12/09  22/03/10

       14,136  541,608       31/12/10  20/03/11

       97  3,735       01/11/14  01/05/15

  £4.45    2,075  79,477    £0.16m  31/03/08  20/03/13

       12,684  485,868       31/12/08  04/08/09

       10,968  420,246       31/12/09  22/03/10

       28,272  1,083,216       31/12/10  20/03/11

       90  3,480       01/11/12  01/05/13

  £2.91    9,550  285,712    £0.23m  29/06/07  20/03/13

Mr Diamond’s Retained Incentive Opportunity (RIO) reached the end of its performance period on 31st December 2007. Vesting was based on Barclays Capital’s cumulative EP over the three-year performance period (which exceeded the £2bn threshold at which the maximum potential value would vest). This value of the RIO award was awarded 50% in cash and 50% in shares, deferred for one year under ESAS. The ESAS number shown as awarded in the year to

Mr Diamond includes the deferred share element of his Retained Incentive Opportunity (1,631,868 shares). No bonus shares are attributable to this award. The cash release made in the year is also shown in the table above.

Mr Varley and Mr Diamond received 6,047 and 172,264 dividend shares respectively from the ESAS released during the year (share price on release date was £4.56).


TSR Peer group constituents

UKMainland EuropeUSUnderpin

Actual

performance

HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB,

Royal Bank of Scotland

Banco Santander,

BBVA, BNP Paribas,

Deutsche Bank, UBS

Citigroup,

JP Morgan

Chase

Cumulative EP over performance period must exceed cumulative EP over previous three years

To be determined at vesting in

March 2011

As above

As aboveTo be determined

at vesting in

March 2010

As above

As abovePerformance condition
partially met

As above

As above

TSR performance

condition not met

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

163


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Pensions

Chris Lucas and Frits Seegers receive a cash allowance of 25% of salary in lieu of joining a Group pension scheme.

John Varley is a member of the Group’s closed UK defined benefit pension scheme. This non-contributory arrangement provides a pension benefit of two thirds of his pensionable salary at the normal retirement age of 60. Should he retire at 55, an unreduced pension of 60% of pensionable salary would be provided. There were no changes to the pension arrangements for Mr Varley during the year. His increase in pension of £83,000 during the year relates to accrual under the scheme. The scheme also provides, whilst in employment, a death in service dependant’s pension of 50% of the pension that would have been payable if employment had continued until normal pension age. Mr Varley also has a defined contribution benefit of £549,816 as at 31st December 2008 in respect of a previous transfer from a freestanding AVC.

Robert E Diamond Jr participates in the Group’s US non-contributory defined benefit arrangements which provide a benefit at age 65 of 1/60th of final average pensionable pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 30 years. In line with current market practice, final average pensionable pay includes salary and an element of bonus up to a current combined maximum of US$350,000. The benefits are provided through the US defined benefit plan (a funded arrangement), and the US Restoration Plan (an unfunded arrangement). The scheme also provides a death in service spouse’s pension of approximately 50% of the pension that would have been payable had early retirement occurred on the date of death.

Mr Diamond also participates in the Barclays Bank PLC 401K Thrift Savings Plan and Thrift Restoration Plan, which are both defined contribution plans. The company contributions in 2008 amounted to £11,745 (US$21,859).

Table 5 sets out the pension benefits of the executive Directors.

Pension accrued during the year represents the change in accrued pension during the year (including inflation at the prescribed rate of 5% (U K)). Pensions paid from the UK final salary section of the applicable

fund are reviewed annually and increase by a minimum of the increase in the retail prices index (capped at 5%), subject to the scheme rules.

The transfer values have been calculated in a manner consistent with the Retirement Benefit Scheme – Transfer Values (GN11) published by the Institute of Actuaries, and the Faculty of Actuaries. During 2008, the independent UK Retirement Fund Trustee changed the transfer value basis for all members. The change reflected different mortality assumptions and a lower discount rate. This contributed £1.4m of the increase in transfer value of John Varley’s pension during the year.

Other benefits

Executive Directors are provided with benefits including private medical insurance, life and disability cover, the use of a company-owned vehicle or the cash equivalent, tax advice and accommodation overseas when required for business purposes. These benefits are available on similar terms to each executive Director. No Director has an expense allowance.

Shareholding guideline

The Committee guideline that executive Directors should hold, as a minimum, the equivalent of one times their base salary in Barclays shares, including shares awarded under ESAS, was met by all executive Directors at 31st December 2007. During the year the Committee increased this guideline to the higher of two times salary or one-third of total remuneration for the last three years. Executive Directors have five years from their appointment to meet this guideline and a reasonable period to build up to the guideline again, if it is not met because of a share price fall. Table 6 shows the executive Directors’ shareholdings. Table 7 shows the indicative change in value of the executive Directors’ total share interests during 2008.


Table 5: Pension provision

 

   

Age at 31st

December
2008

 Completed
years of
service
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st
December
2007

£000

 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(including
increase for
inflation)
£000
 Pension
accrued
during 2008
(excluding
inflation)
£000
 

Accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 

Transfer

value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2007

£000

 

Transfer
value of
accrued
pension
at 31st

December
2008

£000

 Increase
in transfer
value during
the year
£000
 Annual cash
in lieu of
pension
£000

John Varley

 52 26 489 83 59 572 9,463 12,328 2,865 

Robert E Diamon Jr

 57 12 38 7 5 45 214 280 66 

Chris Lucas

 48 1        159

Frits Seegers

 50 2     

   175

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
Executive Directors        
John Varley  470,650    593,266  

Table 6: Interests in shares of Barclays PLC

at 31st December 2008

 
    At 1st January 2008  At 31st December 2008 
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
 
Robert E Diamond Jr  3,402,192    5,866,965   
Chris Lucas  38,003    76,038   
Frits Seegers  699,870    897,747   

Table 7: Indicative change in value of executive Director

total share interests

 
    

Indicative
value at
1st January
2008

£m

  Change in
holdings
£m
  

Indicative
value at
31st December
2008

£m

  

Indicative
decrease
on total share
interest

2008

£m

 
Executive Directors        
John Varley  7.1  1.4  2.5  (6.0)
Robert E Diamond Jr  50.9  22.3  23.5  (49.7)
Chris Lucas  1.0  1.0  0.7  (1.3)
Frits Seegers  6.2  2.6  2.8  (6.0)

Beneficial interests include shares held either directly, or through a nominee, their spouse, and children under 18. They include any interests held through Sharepurchase. Non-beneficial interests include any

interests in shares where the executive Director holds the legal, but not beneficial interest. In addition to the shares above Mr Diamond also holds 200,000 shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited. Mr Seegers has granted a third party bank security over 896,346 of the ordinary shares he holds. Mr Seegers retains beneficial ownership of these shares. He also holds 1,000 ordinary shares in Absa Group Limited. Note 45 provides further information on Directors and officers shareholdings. There were no changes to the interests of executive Directors in shares of Barclays PLC in the period 31st December 2008 to 27th February 2009.

Share interests are beneficial interests plus share plan interests including any initial or provisional allocations and vested awards under ESAS, PSP, ISOP, ESOS and Sharesave.


164

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Performance Linked Remuneration

Each element of remuneration is important and has a specific role in achieving the aims of the remuneration policy. The combined potential remuneration from annual performance bonus and PSP outweighs the other elements, and is subject to personal and Group performance, thereby placing the majority of potential remuneration at risk.

Table 8 shows the average proportions of fixed and variable pay over the last three years.

Table 8: Variable remuneration average over the last three years

(or since joining)

 

 

        Variable 
    Fixed  Cash  Shares 

Executive Directors

    

John Varley

  57% 19% 24%

Robert E Diamond Jr

  2% 39% 59%

Chris Lucas

  38% 12% 49%

Frits Seegers

  22% 25% 53%

Service Contracts

The Group has service contracts with its executive Directors which do not have a fixed term but provide for a notice period from the Group of 12 months and normally for retirement at age 65. Executive Directors’ contracts allow for termination with contractual notice from the Group or, in the alternative, termination by way of payment in lieu of notice (in phased instalments) which are subject to contractual mitigation. In the event of gross misconduct, neither notice nor a payment in lieu of notice will be given.

The Committee’s approach when considering payments in the event of termination is to take account of the individual circumstances including the reason for termination, contractual obligations and share and pension plan rules.

All executive Directors are standing for re-election at the 2009 AGM – see page 141.

Other Directorships

The executive Directors hold directorships in the organisations and receive the fees shown in Table 10.


Table 9: Contract terms

Effective date

of contract

Notice period

from the Company

Potential compensation for loss of office

Executive Directors

John Varley

1st September 200412 months

12 months base salary, bonus and

continuation of medical and pension

benefits whilst an employee

Robert E Diamond Jr

1st June 200512 months

12 months base salary, bonus and

continuation of medical and pension

benefits whilst an employee

Chris Lucas

1st April 200712 months

12 months base salary, bonus equivalent

to the average of the previous three

years up to 100% of base salary and

continuation of medical and pension

benefits whilst an employee

Frits Seegers

7th June 200612 months

12 months base salary, bonus and

continuation of medical and pension

benefits whilst an employee

 

bThe Group Chairman and executive Directors receive benefits in kind, which may include life and disability cover, the use of a Company owned vehicle or cash equivalent, medical insurance and tax advice. Benefits are provided on similar terms to other senior executives. No Director has an expense allowance.

 

cMarcus Agius was appointed as a non-executive Director on 1st September 2006 and as Group Chairman from 1st January 2007.

Table 10: Other directorships held by the executive Directors and fees retained

        2008  2007
Director  Organisation  Fees  Fees
retained
  Fees  Fees
retained

John Varley

  British Grolux Investments Limited  £7,788  £7,788  £7,613  £7,613
  AstraZeneca plc  £83,333  £83,333  £56,486  £56,486
   International Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore  US$0  US$0  US$10,000  US$10,000

Robert E Diamond Jr

  Old Vic Productions plc  £0  £0  £0  £0

Frits Seegers

  Absa Group Limited and Absa Bank Limited  £26,807  £0  £33,363  £0

Chris Lucas

              

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

165


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

 

dIn 2007 John Varley was a Director of Ascot Authority (Holdings) Limited (Directorship ceased on 31st December 2007) and British Grolux Investments Limited for which he received fees of £20,085 and £7,613 respectively (2006: £26,000 and £7,500 respectively). John Varley is a non-executive Director of AstraZeneca plc for which he received fees of £56,486 in 2007 (2006: £21,075). John Varley is also a member of the International Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore for which he received fees of US$10,000 in 2007 (2006: US$10,000). John Varley is Chairman of Business Action on Homelessness and President of the Employers’ Forum on Disability for which he receives no fees. Robert E Diamond Jr is Chairman of Old Vic Productions plc for which he received no fees in 2007. Gary Hoffman is a Director of Visa (Europe) Limited and Visa (International) Limited for which he receives no fees. Gary Hoffman is also a Director of Trinity Mirror plc for which he received fees of £62,754 in 2007 (2006: £50,000). During the course of his Directorship Naguib Kheraj was a member of the Board of Governors of the Institute of Ismaili Studies and Chairman of the National Committee of the Aga Khan Foundation for which he received no fees in 2007. Naguib Kheraj (up to 31st March 2007) and Frits Seegers are non-executive Directors of Absa Group Limited and Absa Bank Limited. They have both waived their fees, which were paid to Barclays. Their respective fees in 2007 were ZAR136,533 (£9,694) and ZAR469,900 (£33,363) (2006: ZAR425,100 (£34,096) and ZAR75,400 (£6,048) respectively).

Group Chairman, Deputy Chairman and non-executive Directors

The Group Chairman, Deputy Chairman and non-executive Directors receive fees which reflect the individual responsibilities and membership of Board Committees. Fees are reviewed each year by the Board. Fees were last increased in June 2008.

The first £20,000 of each non-executive Director’s base fee and the Deputy Chairman’s fee is used to purchase Barclays shares. These shares, together with reinvested dividends, are retained on behalf of the non-executive Directors until they retire from the Board.

Marcus Agius, Group Chairman, has a minimum time commitment to Barclays of the equivalent to 60% of a full-time role and he receives private health insurance in addition to his fees. Marcus Agius is not

eligible to participate in Barclays bonus and share incentive plans nor will he participate in Barclays pension plans or receive any pension contributions. No other non-executive Director receives any benefits from Barclays.

Details of the remuneration received by the non-executive Directors during the year and their beneficial interests in Barclays PLC shares are set out in tables 11 and 12.

Letters of Appointment

The Group Chairman, Deputy Chairman and non-executive Directors have individual letters of appointment. Each appointment is for an initial six-year term, renewable for a single term of three years thereafter. Sir Nigel Rudd’s re-appointment as Deputy Chairman has been approved annually by shareholders.

All non-executive Directors, except Sir Nigel Rudd DL and Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, are standing for re-election at the 2009 AGM – see page 155.


 

eThe remuneration for 2007 for Robert E Diamond Jr was based on the performance of Barclays Group, Barclays Capital, Barclays Global Investors and Barclays Wealth, both on an absolute and industry relative basis. The composition of this package continues to be heavily weighted towards elements that are ‘at risk’ and reflects practice in the investment banking and investment management industry.
Table 11: Fees
   Chairman
£000
  Deputy
Chairman
£000
  Board
Member
£000
  Senior
Independent
Director
£000
 Audit
Committee
£000
  Board HR
and
Remuneration
Committee
£000
 Board
Corporate
Governance
and
Nominations
Committee
£000
  Board Risk
Committee
£000
 Benefits
£000
  Total
2008
£000
  Total
2007
£000

Full-year fee

                  

(at 31st Dec 08)

 750  200  70  30           

Full-year fee – Committee Chair

                  

(at 31st Dec 08)

        60  40   40     

Full-year fee – Committee Member

                  

(at 31st Dec 08)

        25  15 15  15     
Fees to 31st December 2008                  

Group Chairman

                  

Marcus Agius

 750         M. Ch.   1  751  751

Non-executive Directors

                  

David Booth

     M.        M.   83  43

Sir Richard Broadbent

     M.  Snr. Ind.   Ch. M.  Ch.   188  180

Leigh Clifford AO

     M.     M.      115  97

Fulvio Conti

 

    

M.

   M.        90  85
Professor Dame Sandra Dawson     M.   M.        90  85

Sir Andrew Likierman

     M.   M.     M.   105  100

Sir Michael Rake

     M.   M.        90  

Sir Nigel Rudd DL

   D. Ch.        M.     200  200

Stephen Russell

     M.   Ch.   M.  M.   153  145

Sir John Sunderland

     M.     M. M.     98  95

Patience Wheatcroft

     M.           78  

Patience Wheatcroft was a member of the Brand and Reputation Committee for which the full year fee is £15,000. Leigh Clifford was also a member of the Asia Pacific Advisory Committee and received fees of US$60,000 (2007: US$35,000). These fees are included in those shown above.

 

fChris Lucas was appointed as an executive Director with effect from 1st April 2007. In addition to the amount shown in the ‘Salary and fees’ column above, Chris Lucas received an award under ESAS in recognition of forfeited compensation from his previous employment. Bonus shares are not applicable to this award. Details of this ESAS award are shown in the table on page 137 and the first table on page 138, and are not included in the table above. In addition, Chris Lucas received an award under the PSP which is shown in the table above (footnote k on this page provides further information). Chris Lucas received an allowance of 25% of base salary (£112,500) in lieu of pension contributions. This amount is included in the column for ‘Benefits’ in the table above.
Table 12: Shareholdings            
    

At

1st January
2008

total
beneficial
interests

  

At 31st
December
2008

total
beneficial
interests

  

At 27th
February
2009

total
beneficial
interests

Group Chairman

      

Marcus Agius

  86,136  113,148  113,148

Non-executive Directors

      

David Booth

  50,374  64,248  64,248

Sir Richard Broadbent

  14,026  24,625  24,625

Leigh Clifford AO

  18,872  26,236  26,236

Fulvio Conti

  10,067  30,482  30,482

Professor Dame

      

Sandra Dawson

  12,040  18,859  18,859

Sir Andrew Likierman

  8,137  13,297  13,297

Sir Michael Rake

  2,700  6,399  6,399

Sir Nigel Rudd DL

  84,843  107,569  107,569

Stephen Russell

  21,054  30,459  30,459

Sir John Sunderland

  31,658  71,463  71,463

Patience Wheatcroft

  828  4,144  4,144

Table 13: Terms of Letters of Appointment

Effective

date

Notice

period

from the

Company

Potential

compensation

for loss

of office

Group Chairman

Marcus Agius

1st Jan 2007

12 months

12 months contractual

remuneration

Non-executive Directors

David Booth

1st May 20076 months6 months fees

Sir Richard Broadbent

1st Sep 20036 months6 months fees

Leigh Clifford AO

1st Oct 20046 months6 months fees

Fulvio Conti

1st Apr 20066 months6 months fees

Professor Dame

Sandra Dawson

1st Mar 20036 months6 months fees

Sir Andrew Likierman

1st Sep 20046 months6 months fees

Sir Michael Rake

1st Jan 20086 months6 months fees

Sir Nigel Rudd DL

1st Feb 19966 months6 months fees

Stephen Russell

25th Oct 20006 months6 months fees

Sir John Sunderland

1st Jun 20056 months6 months fees

Patience Wheatcroft

1st Jan 20086 months6 months fees

166

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Former Directors

Gary Hoffman and Dr Danie Cronjé ceased to be Directors during the year.

Mr Hoffman resigned as a Director on 23rd July 2008 and ceased to be an executive Director on 31st August 2008. His employment ceased on 30th September 2008. On cessation of his directorship and employment, Mr Hoffman received no termination payments and it was mutually agreed that his full notice period would be waived without payment in lieu, to allow him to take up his appointment at Northern Rock. Dr Cronjé did not put himself forward for re-election at the 2008 AGM and received no termination payments. Their remuneration received during the year was as follows:

 

gFrits Seegers received an allowance of 25% of base salary (£175,000) in lieu of pension contributions (pro-rata 2006: £84,028). This amount is included in the column for ‘Benefits’ in the table above.
Table 14: Annual remuneration    
    Received for 2008
    

Salary
and fees

£000

  

Annual
cash bonus

£000

  

Deferred
share award
(ESAS)

£000

  

Long term
incentive
(PSP)

£000

  

Benefits

£000

  

Total
2008

£000

  Total
2007
£000

Gary Hoffman

  417  298      9  724  1,146

Dr Danie Cronjé

  25          25  217

Mr Hoffman received his normal monthly salary benefits and pro-rated annual cash bonus, total of £90,477 for the period between the cessation of his directorship and 30th September 2008.

The former Directors’ beneficial shareholdings were as follows:

 

h£20,000 of each non-executive Director’s base fee of £65,000 is used, after tax, to buy Barclays shares. Further details are provided on page 142.
Table 15: Shareholdings at date of cessation as Director      
    

At 1st January 2008

total beneficial holdings

  

At date of cessation as Director

total beneficial holdings

Gary Hoffman

  431,761  542,979

Dr Danie Cronjé

  5,146  6,416

Dr Cronjé also held 11,700 preference shares in Absa Bank Limited and 101,577 ordinary shares in Absa Bank Limited at 31st January 2008 and 24th April 2008.

Mr Hoffman participates in the UK closed defined benefit pension scheme providing a pension at the normal retirement age of 60 at an accrual rate of 1/60th of pensionable salary for each year of pensionable service.

 

iDavid Booth was appointed as a non-executive Director on 1st May 2007.
Table 16: Pension provision
    Age at
31st August
2008
  Completed
years of
service
  

Accrued
pension

at 31st
December
2007
£000

  Pension
accrued
during 2008
(including
increase for
inflation)
£000
  Pension
accrued
during 2008
(excluding
inflation)
£000
  

Accrued
pension

at 31st
August
2008
£000

  

Transfer
value of
accrued
pension

at 31st
December
2007
£000

  

Transfer
value of
accrued
pension

at 31st
August
2008
£000

  Increase
in transfer
value during
the year
£000

Gary Hoffman

  47  25  273  (1) (15) 272  2,598  2,824  226

In addition to the value of the accrued pension at 31st August 2008, Mr Hoffman also had defined contribution benefits in respect of Special Company Contributions (bonus sacrifice). The fund value of this arrangement was £626,412 as at 31st August 2008. The scheme also provided, whilst in employment, a death in service dependant’s pension of 50% of the pension that would have been payable if employment had continued until normal pension age.

The terms of Mr Hoffman’s contract and Dr Cronjé’s letter of appointment were:

Table 17: Terms of contract or letter of appointment
Effective date

Notice period from

the Company

Potential compensation

for loss of office

Gary Hoffman

1st January 200412 months12 months base salary, bonus equivalent to the average of the previous three years up to 100% of base salary, and continuation of medical and pension benefits whilst an employee

Dr Danie Cronjé

1st September 20056 months6 months fees

Mr Hoffman’s other Directorships and fees retained were:

 

jNaguib Kheraj ceased to be an executive Director on 31st March 2007. The amounts shown in the table above are in respect of the period from 1st January 2007 to 31st March 2007. During this period Naguib Kheraj received an allowance of 23% of base salary (£40,250) in lieu of pension contributions (2006: £149,500). This amount has been included in the column for ‘Benefits’ above. In order to effect a successful handover to his successor, from 1st April 2007 to 30th April 2007, Naguib Kheraj was paid in accordance with the terms of his service contract (being a total amount of £218,343 which included a discretionary bonus of £145,833). Following the termination of his service contract and taking into consideration the duty to mitigate his loss, no payments were made to Naguib Kheraj in relation to the termination of his contract. Naguib Kheraj was retained by Barclays in a corporate finance advisory role for an eight month period from 1st May 2007 to 31st December 2007. Naguib Kheraj received a payment of £600,000 per month for this period, as well as a payment of £14,178 per month for contractual benefits (including an allowance in lieu of pensions contributions). Naguib Kheraj’s corporate finance role was terminated on 31st December 2007 and no payments were made to Naguib Kheraj on termination of this arrangement.
Table 18: Other Directorships held by Gary Hoffman                
    2008  2007
Organisation  Fees
£000
  Fees
retained
£000
  Fees
£000
  Fees
retained
£000

Visa (Europe) Limited

  £0  £0  £0  £0

Trinity Mirror plc

  £46,666  £46,666  £62,754  £62,754

Barclays Pension Fund Trustees Limited

  £12,500  £12,500      

Mr Hoffman was retained as a Director of Barclays Pension Fund Trustees Limited following cessation of his employment on 30th September 2008. The fees disclosed represent those paid to him for the remainder of 2008.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

167


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

 

kThe amounts shown for Mandatory ESAS represent the value of Barclays shares to be recommended for an award under Mandatory ESAS for the 2007 results and, recommended for an award under Mandatory ESAS for the 2006 results, including a maximum 30% bonus share element. The Mandatory ESAS awards for the 2006 results are included in the table on page 137 and the first table on page 138. The amounts shown for PSP represent the value of Barclays shares under initial allocation to be recommended for an award under PSP in March 2008 and recommended for an award under PSP in March 2007 (May 2007 for Chris Lucas). The PSP awards granted in 2007 are included in the table on page 137 and the first table on page 139. Please refer to page 131 for further details on ESAS and PSP.

 

lIn addition to the Mandatory ESAS award shown for the 2007 results, Robert E Diamond Jr will receive a separate award under ESAS in respect of the Retained Incentive Opportunity as described in footnote f to the table on page 139. Bonus shares do not apply to the ESAS award in respect of the Retained Incentive Opportunity.

Table 19: Executive Share Award Scheme (ESAS)

 

Scheme Number at
beginning
of year
(maximum)
 

Awarded
in year

(maximum)

 Market
price on
award
date
 Number
released
  Market
price on
release
date
 Number
lapsed
 Adjustment
due to
open offer
 Adjusted
number at
31/08/08
(maximum)
 Value of
release
 First
release
date
 Last
release
date

Gary Hoffman

           

ESAS

 177,314 48,215 £4.25 (19,273) £4.56  5,527 211,783 £0.1m 13/03/06 20/03/11

Table 20: Voluntary Executive Share Award Scheme (VESAS)

Scheme Number at
beginning
of year
(maximum)
 

Awarded
in year

(maximum)

 Adjusted
exercise
price
 Number
vested
in year
 

Number

exercised

 

Market
price on
exercise/
lapse

date

 Number
lapsed
 Adjustment
due to
open offer
 Adjusted
number
31/08/08
(maximum)
 Vested
number
of share
options
 Value of
exercise
 First
exercise
date
 Last
exercise
date

Gary Hoffman

             

VESAS

 97,088  nil     2,602 99,690 92,022  05/03/07 29/09/09

Table 21: Performance Share Plan (PSP)

   Maximum
number of
shares at
beginning
of year
 

Maximum
number

of shares
awarded in

the year

 Market
price on
award
date
 

Number

released

 Market
price on
release/
lapse date
 

Number

lapsed

  Adjustment
due to
open offer
 Adjusted
maximum
number of
shares at
31/08/08
 

Value of

release

 

End of

three year

performance

period

 

Scheduled

release date

Gary Hoffman

           

2005

 227,274  £5.30   (227,274)    31/12/07 16/06/08

2006

 288,276  £6.75     7,728 296,004  31/12/08 21/03/09

2007

 255,798  £7.08     6,858 262,656  31/12/09 22/03/10

2008

  412,086 £4.25     11,046 423,132  31/12/10 20/03/11

Table 22: Incentive Share Option Plan (ISOP)

Scheme Number at
beginning
of year
(maximum)
 Awarded
in year
(maximum)
 Adjusted
weighted
exercise
price
 Number
vested
in year
 Number
exercised
 Market
price on
exercise/
lapse date
 Number
lapsed
 Adjustment
due to
open offer
 Adjusted
number at
31/08/08
(maximum)
 Vested
number
of share
options
 Value of
exercise
 First
exercise
date
 Last
exercise
date

Gary Hoffman

             

ISOP

 540,000  £4.39     14,472 554,472 554,472  12/03/04 29/09/09

Table 23: Sharesave

   Number at
beginning
of year
(maximum)
 Awarded
in year
(maximum)
 Adjusted
weighted
exercise
price
 Number
vested
in year
 Number
exercised
 Market
price on
exercise
date
    

Adjusted

number
lapsed

 Adjustment
due to
open offer
 Adjusted
number at
31/08/08
(maximum)
 Vested
number
of share
options
 Value of
exercise
 First
exercise
date
 Last
exercise
date

Gary Hoffman

              

Total

 6,150  £4.24       163 6,313   n/a n/a

168

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

135


Corporate governance

Remuneration report


LOGO

Share and Long Term Incentive Plans

Barclays operates a number of Group-wide plans. Summaries of the principal plans are set out below. Barclays has a number of employee benefit trusts which operate with these plans. In some cases, the trustees grant awards and purchase shares in the market to satisfy awards as required, in others, new issue or treasury shares may be used to satisfy awards where the appropriate shareholder approval has been obtained. The number of shares held by the trustees is set out in Note 32 on page 229. The limits on the issue of new shares comply with the guidelines issued by the Association of British Insurers.

Table 24: Plans under which awards made in 2008

 

Plan name

Executive Directors: pension accrued assuming retirement at normal pension agea,b,c
Directors
Eligible?

 

    

Age

at 31st

December

2007

 

  

Completed

years

of service

 

  

Accrued

pension

at 31st

December
2006

£000

  Pension
accrued
during 2007
(including
increase for
inflation)
£000
  Pension
accrued
during
2007
(excluding
inflation)
£000
  

Accrued
pension

at 31st

December
2007

£000

  

 

Transfer

value of
accrued
pension

at 31st

December
2006
£000

  

Transfer

value of
accrued
pension

at 31st

December
2007

£000

  Increase in
transfer
value
during the
year £000
Executive Directors                  

John Varleyd, e

  51  25  418  71  55  489  7,696  9,463  1,767

Robert E Diamond Jrf, g

  56  11  36  2  2  38  195  214  19

Gary Hoffmane

  47  25  253  20  11  273  2,352  2,598  246

Chris Lucash

  47                

Frits Seegersh

  49  1              
Former Director                  

Naguib Kherajh,i

  43  10              

NotesDescription

aPension accrued during the year represents the change in accrued pension (including inflation at the prescribed rate of 3.9%) which occurred during the entire year. The pensions paid from the final salary section of the applicable pension fund are reviewed annually. Pensions increase by a minimum of the increase in the retail prices index (up to a maximum of 5%), subject to the scheme rules.

 

bThe transfer values have been calculated in a manner consistent with the Retirement Benefit Scheme – Transfer Values (GN11) published by the Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Actuaries.

Performance

Share Plan

(PSP)

Yes

–    PSP is a performance related share plan under which awards of Barclays shares may be made to selected employees (including executive Directors), subject to trustee discretion.

–    The PSP trustee may select any employee of the Group to participate in the plan.

–    Awards are granted by the PSP trustee, in consultation with the Remuneration Committee and are communicated as provisional allocations to participants. No right to the shares arises until the PSP trustee releases the shares.

–    Participants do not pay for a grant or release of an award.

–    Awards are normally releasable on or after the third anniversary of grant, to the extent that applicable performance conditions are satisfied, subject to trustee discretion.

–    Any awards released may also include an additional number of shares equivalent to any dividends that would have been paid on the shares between the date of grant and release.

–    Normally, the maximum expected value of an award made to an employee at the date of grant is the higher of 150% of base salary, or 75% of base salary and target bonus. Maximum awards reflect the relevant market for each executive Director. Awards are communicated on grant as an expected value, this is a single value for the award at grant, which takes into account the sum of the various possible performance and vesting outcomes.

–    On cessation of employment, eligible leavers (as defined) normally receive an award pro rated for time and performance subject to trustee discretion. For other leavers, awards will normally lapse.

–    On a change of control awards may vest at the PSP trustee’s discretion and may be pro rated for time and performance to the date of change of control.

–    PSP is not an HMRC approved plan.

–    The plan was approved for a ten year period by shareholders in April 2005.

 

cWith the exception of the benefits provided through the US Restoration Plan for Robert E Diamond Jr, the pension benefits for all Directors shown above are provided for on a funded basis.

dJohn Varley is a member of the Group’s closed UK defined benefit pension arrangement. This non-contributory pension scheme has a normal pension age of 60 and in accordance with his service contract, the scheme provides him with a pension benefit of 66.67% of his Pensionable Salary at normal pension age. Should John Varley retire at age 55, the scheme provides for an unreduced pension of 60% of Pensionable Salary.

eIn addition to the transfer value of accrued pension at 31st December 2007, John Varley and Gary Hoffman also have defined contribution benefits. John Varley’s benefit is in respect of a transfer from a previous pension arrangement while Gary Hoffman’s benefit is in respect of Special Company Contributions (Bonus Sacrifice). The fund values of these arrangements as at 31st December 2007 for John Varley and Gary Hoffman were £689,214 and £702,078 respectively.

fThe benefits shown above in respect of Robert E Diamond Jr’s participation in the Group’s US non-contributory defined benefit arrangement and the US Restoration Plan have been converted to Pounds Sterling using the 2007 year-end exchange rate of US$2.00334 (2006: US$1.96).

gRobert E Diamond Jr is also a member of the Barclays Bank PLC 401K Thrift Savings Plan and Thrift Restoration Plan. These are US defined contribution plans. Company contributions into these plans in 2007 amounted to £10,233 (US$20,500).

hChris Lucas, Naguib Kheraj and Frits Seegers do not participate in any of the Group’s pension arrangements. Instead they receive a cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions of 25%, 23% and 25% of their respective salaries. Chris Lucas’ pro-rated cash allowance in 2007 amounted to £112,500. Naguib Kheraj, who ceased to be a Director on 31st March 2007, received a pro-rated cash allowance of £40,250, while Frits Seegers’ cash allowance in 2007 was £175,000.

iIn addition to the cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions, Naguib Kheraj has defined contribution benefits in respect of a previous period of participation in afterwork. The fund value of this deferred benefit as at 31st March 2007, when he ceased to be an executive Director, was £110,821.

136

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Executive Directors: illustration of change in value of Barclays PLC shares owned beneficially, or held under option or awarded under employee share plans as at 31st December 2007a

    

 

Number at 31st December 2007

  

 

Notional
value based
on share
price of
£7.30f

£000

  

 

Notional
value based
on share
price of
£5.04g

£000

    
  Shares
owned
beneficially
b
  ESASc  PSPd  

 

Executive
Share
Option
Scheme
(ESOS)
e

  ISOPe  Sharesave  Total      Change in
notional
value
£000
 

 

Executive Directors

                    

John Varley

  470,650  344,711  459,503    920,000  3,638  2,198,502  11,976  7,056  (4,920)

Robert E Diamond Jr

  3,402,192  4,863,749  1,755,335  100,000  560,000    10,681,276  75,033  50,942  (24,091)

Gary Hoffman

  431,761  274,402  257,116    540,000  6,150  1,509,429  8,555  5,187  (3,368)

Chris Lucas

  38,003  69,091  82,910      3,638  193,642  1,382  958  (424)

Frits Seegers

  699,870  231,383  294,154      3,390  1,228,797  8,954  6,177  (2,777)

Notes

aUnder PSP, ESAS, ISOP, ESOS and Sharesave, nothing was paid by the participants on the grant of options or awards.

bThe number shown includes shares held under Sharepurchase.

cESAS includes the maximum potential 30% bonus share element where applicable, and any voluntary ESAS awards.

dThe number of shares shown represents the initial allocation of shares.

eThe number of shares shown represents the vested shares under option.

fWith the exception of Chris Lucas, the notional value is based on the share price as at 31st December 2006. The notional value for Chris Lucas is based on a share price of £7.23, which was the share price as at 2nd April 2007, the first working day after he was appointed executive Director.

gThe notional value is based on the share price as at 31st December 2007. The highest and lowest market prices per share during the year were £7.90 and £4.775 respectively.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

137


Corporate governance

Remuneration report

Executive Directors: shares provisionally allocated and shares under option under ESASa,h,i,j

      During 2007   
    Number at
1st January
2007
  

 

Awarded in
respect of
the results
for 2006

  Releasedc  Market
price on
Release
date £
  Exercised  Market
price on
Exercise
date £
  Bonus
shares
lapsed
  

Number

at 31st

December
2007

 

Executive Directors

                

John Varley

  278,211  95,328  28,828  7.15        344,711

Robert E Diamond Jrd

  5,282,875  616,303  1,035,429  7.15        4,863,749

Gary Hoffman

  166,526  27,712  16,924  7.15        177,314

Chris Lucasb

                69,091

Frits Seegers

  802,208  70,941  641,766  6.84        231,383

 

Former Director

                

Naguib Kheraj

  790,317    230,560  7.15        559,757

Shares under option under ESAS and voluntary ESAS as at 31st December 2007 (with the exception of voluntary ESAS, shares under option are included in aggregate figures above)

         During 2007         
   Nil cost
option
granted at
3rd anniversary
 
 
 
e
 Nil cost
option
under
voluntary
ESAS at
1st January
2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
f
 Voluntary
ESAS
option
granted
  Voluntary
ESAS option
exercised
 
 
g
 Market price
on exercise
date of
voluntary
ESAS
option 
 
 
 
 
 
£
 Bonus
shares
lapsed on
exercise of
voluntary
ESAS option
  Number
under
Voluntary
ESAS at
31st
December
2007
  Date from
which
exercisable
  Latest
expiry
date

Executive Directors

              

John Varley

  56,037              28/02/06  05/03/09

Robert E Diamond Jr

                  

Gary Hoffman

  47,663  136,584    39,496  7.17    97,088  05/03/04  05/03/14

Chris Lucas

                  

Frits Seegers

                  
Former Director              

Naguib Kheraj

  402,509              28/02/06  30/06/08

Notes

aThe number of shares shown in the table includes the maximum potential 30% bonus element where applicable.

bFigures shown in the column ‘Number at 1st January 2007’ for Chris Lucas are as at date of joining. An award of 69,091 Barclays shares was granted to Chris Lucas on 1st May 2007, following his appointment as an executive Director on 1st April 2007, in recognition of forfeited compensation from his previous employment. Bonus shares are not applicable to the award.

cThe trustees may release additional shares to participants which represent accumulated dividends (net of withholding) in respect of shares under award. During 2007, the trustees released the following accumulated dividend shares: 6,865 to John Varley, 100,645 to Robert E Diamond Jr, 4,030 to Gary Hoffman and 54,899 to Naguib Kheraj. These are not awarded as part of the original award and consequently are not included in the ‘Released’ column.

dThe number shown in the column headed ‘Number at 1st January 2007’ includes shares held by Robert E Diamond Jr which reflect interests built up over the course of successive years’ service with Barclays. The awards were related to Robert E Diamond Jr’s contribution to the performance of Investment Banking, Investment Management and the Barclays Group as a whole.

eThe shares under option shown in this column are already included in the numbers shown at 1st January 2007 in the first table on this page, and relate to provisional allocations made in 2003 and 2004 except that the figures do not include accumulated dividend shares under option as follows: 7,410 shares for John Varley, 6,303 shares for Gary Hoffman and 53,059 shares for Naguib Kheraj.

fThe shares under option in this column are not included in the numbers shown at 1st January 2007 or 31st December 2007 in the first table on this page.

gThese figures do not include 9,624 accumulated dividend shares released on exercise of voluntary ESAS options.

hAwards in respect of 2007 will be made in March 2008. Including the maximum potential 30% bonus element, awards will total £617,500 to John Varley, £11,375,000 to Robert E Diamond Jr, £219,375 to Gary Hoffman, £568,750 to Frits Seegers and £195,000 to Chris Lucas.

iNothing was paid by the participants on the grant of options or awards.

jPlease refer to page 131 for further details on ESAS and voluntary ESAS.

138

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Executive Directors: awards under PSPa,e

    Shares
under
initial
allocation
at
1st January
2007
  Shares
under
initial
allocation
granted
during
2007
b
  Maximum
number
of shares
granted
during
2007
  

Market
price
on
award
date

£c

  Performance
period
d
  Scheduled
vesting
date
  Shares under
initial
allocation at
31st December
2007
  Maximum
number of
shares under
award at
31st December
2007
  Lapses
due in 2008
based on
maximum
number
of shares
under award

Executive Directors

                  

John Varley

                  

2005

  142,045        01/01/05 - 31/12/07  16/06/08  142,045  426,135  426,135

2006

  153,748        01/01/06 - 31/12/08  23/03/09  153,748  461,244  

2007

    163,710  491,130  7.08  01/01/07 - 31/12/09  22/03/10  163,710  491,130  

Total

                    459,503  1,378,509   

Robert E Diamond Jr

                  

2005

  52,083        01/01/05 - 31/12/07  16/06/08  52,083  156,249  156,249

2006

  768,736        01/01/06 - 31/12/08  23/03/09  768,736  2,306,208  

2007

    934,516  2,803,548  7.08  01/01/07 - 31/12/09  22/03/10  934,516  2,803,548  

Total

                    1,755,335  5,266,005   

Gary Hoffman

                  

2005

  75,758        01/01/05 - 31/12/07  16/06/08  75,758  227,274  227,274

2006

  96,092        01/01/06 - 31/12/08  23/03/09  96,092  288,276  

2007

    85,266  255,798  7.08  01/01/07 - 31/12/09  22/03/10  85,266  255,798  

Total

                    257,116  771,348   

Chris Lucas

                  

2007

    82,910  248,730  7.23  01/01/07 - 31/12/09  22/03/10  82,910  248,730  

Total

                    82,910  248,730   

Frits Seegers

                  

2006

  157,728        01/01/06 - 31/12/08  04/08/09  157,728  473,184  

2007

    136,426  409,278  7.08  01/01/07 - 31/12/09  22/03/10  136,426  409,278  

Total

                    294,154  882,462   

Former Director

                  

Naguib Kheraj

                  

2005

  87,121        01/01/05 - 31/12/07  16/06/08  87,121  261,363  261,363

2006

  107,624        01/01/06 - 31/12/08  23/03/09  107,624  322,872  

Total

                    194,745  584,235   

Executive Directors: Retained Incentive Opportunityf

Date of
award
Maximum
potential
value
£000s
Performance
period
Vesting
date

Robert E Diamond Jr

25/05/0514,85001/01/05 - 31/12/07No later
than
15/03/08

Notes

aThe performance conditions for the 2005 awards were not met and all awards are due to lapse in 2008.

bIn respect of John Varley, Robert E Diamond Jr, Gary Hoffman and Frits Seegers, the price used to convert the present fair value of the award to a number of shares was £7.33. This was the average over the period 20th February 2007 to 13th March 2007. In respect of Chris Lucas, the price used to convert the present fair value of the award to a number of shares was £7.23, which was the price at which shares were purchased in the market to fund the award.

cThe price shown is the mid-market closing price on the date of the award.

dThe details of the performance conditions for PSP are included on page 131.

eFigures shown in the column ‘Shares under initial allocation at 1st January 2007’ for Chris Lucas are as at date of joining. Nothing was paid by the participants on the grant of awards.

fRobert E Diamond Jr’s award under the Retained lncentive Opportunity reached the end of its performance period on 31st December 2007. Barclays Capital’s cumulative EP over the three-year performance period, which started on 1st January 2005, exceeded the £2bn threshold for the maximum potential value to vest in accordance with the terms of the award. This resulted in a vesting in February 2008 to the value of £14,850,000 with 50% payable in cash and the remaining 50% as a recommendation to the trustee of ESAS for an award of Barclays shares in the form of a provisional allocation. Any shares under the ESAS award would be releasable after 12 months from the award date. Bonus shares are not applicable to this award.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

139


Corporate governance

Remuneration report

Executive Directors: shares under option under Sharesavea

      During 2007        Information as at 31st December 2007
  

 

Number
held at
1st
January
2007

  Granted  Exercised  Exercise
price per
share
  

 

Market
price on
date of
exercise

  

 

Number
of shares
held under
option

  Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options
  Date from
which
exercisable
  Latest
expiry
date
            £  £     £      

Executive Directors

                  

John Varley

  4,096  3,638  4,096  4.11  7.89  3,638  4.83  01/11/14  30/04/15

Robert E Diamond Jr

                  

Gary Hoffman

  6,474    324  3.16  5.09  6,150  4.35  01/11/08  30/04/14

Chris Lucas

    3,638        3,638  4.83  01/11/14  30/04/15

Frits Seegers

    3,390        3,390  4.83  01/11/12  30/04/13

Former Director

                  

Naguib Kheraj

  4,007          4,007  4.08  01/01/08  30/06/08

Note

aFigures shown in the column ‘Number held at 1st January 2007’ for Chris Lucas are as at date of joining. Nothing was paid by the participants on the grant of options.

140

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

 

Executive Directors:Share Award Scheme

(ESAS)

Yes

–    ESAS is a deferred share award plan operated in conjunction with various Barclays Group bonus plans for selected employees (including executive Directors), subject to trustee discretion.

–    Awards are granted by the ESAS trustee having first consulted with the Remuneration Committee.

–    For certain eligible employees a proportion of discretionary annual bonus is delivered in cash and a proportion is as a recommended mandatory provisional allocation of Barclays shares under ESAS. Normally, for executive Directors, a minimum of 25% of bonus is delivered as a recommended mandatory award under ESAS with 75% delivered as cash.

–    The mandatory provisional allocation will normally include bonus shares equal to 30% of the value of the deferred bonus amount awarded in shares. Bonus shares are awarded to recognise the interest that a participant forgoes on the deferred part of the discretionary bonus.

–    Under mandatory ESAS awards, nil cost options are typically granted three years from award, subject to the discretion of the ESAS trustee. Participants may then call for the shares plus two thirds of the bonus shares and any associated dividend shares. If the nil cost option is not exercised by the end of the two year period, the ESAS trustee may release all shares, bonus shares and any dividend shares to the participant.

–    In addition to mandatory ESAS, participants may also request to waive any bonus (or part of a bonus) to which they may become entitled and request that a voluntary ESAS award be made to them in the form of a nil cost option. Voluntary ESAS awards are typically fully exercisable after five years, and include bonus shares equal to 30% of the waived bonus amount. Dividend shares may be awarded, as per mandatory ESAS awards.

–    On cessation of employment, a participant may forfeit an award depending on the reason for leaving. Special provisions apply on a change of control.

–    ESAS is also used into make certain awards to facilitate the retention and recruitment of new joiners to the Group who have forfeited share awards on leaving previous employment. Typically bonus shares are not awarded, though dividend shares may be awarded, as per mandatory ESAS awards.

–    ESAS is not an HMRC approved plan.

Incentive shares

No

–    Incentive shares are discretionary share awards that may be made to selected employees (excluding executive Directors), subject to trustee discretion.

–    Shares are normally released after three years, (ESOS, ISOPsubject to continued employment and the BGI EOP)discretion of the trustee. Dividends received are normally awarded as additional shares and released at the same time.

–    On cessation of employment eligible leavers (as defined) normally receive an award pro rated for time in employment, subject to the discretion of the trustee; for other leavers, awards will normally lapse.

–    On a change of control awards may vest, pro rated for time to the date of change of control, subject to the discretion of the trustee.

–    Incentive shares is not an HMRC approved plan.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

The executive Directors continue to have interests169


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Share and Long Term Incentive Plans (continued)

Table 24: Plans under which awards made in Barclays PLC ordinary shares2008 (continued)
Plan nameExecutive
Directors
Eligible?
Description
SharesaveYes

–   Sharesave is a share option plan under ESOSaand ISOPb, and in BGI Holdings under the BGI EOPc(as indicatedwhich all eligible employees in the table below). No awards were madeUK, Ireland and Spain (including executive Directors) are invited to Directors under these plans during 2007.participate. It is HMRC approved in the UK and approved by the Revenue Commissioners in Ireland.

–   Participants are granted options over Barclays shares which may be at a discount to the market value at the date of award (currently 20%).

–   At the expiry of a fixed term (three, five or seven years) participants may use savings to acquire the shares by exercising their option within 6 months of the date of vesting. Participants may save up to £250 per month (500 in Ireland,135 in Spain) for this purpose.

Executive Directors: awards under plans used–   On cessation of employment eligible leavers (as defined) may exercise their option to acquire shares to the extent of their savings for a period of 6 months.

–   On a change of control, participants may be able to exercise their options to acquire shares to the extent of their savings for a period of 6 months (or a shorter period in previous yearsecertain circumstances).

–   The plan was approved for a ten year period by shareholders in April 2000.

 

    

Maximum   
number of   
shares under   
option   
at   

1st January   
2007   

 

  

 

 

 

During 2007

  Market
price on
exercise
date
£
  

Maximum
number of
shares under
option at
31st
December
2007

 

  Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options
£
  

Date from
which
exercisable

 

  

Latest
expiry
date

 

  

Vested
number

of shares
at 31st
December
2007

 

    

Exercised

 

  

Lapsed

 

            

Executive Directors

                  

John Varley

                  

ISOP

  2,060,000    1,140,000    920,000  4.41  18/05/03  22/03/14  920,000

Robert E Diamond Jr

                  

ESOS

  100,000        100,000  3.97  14/08/01  13/08/08  100,000

ISOP

  1,340,000    780,000    560,000  4.54  12/03/04  22/03/14  560,000

BGI EOP

  100,000        100,000  20.11  26/03/07  26/03/14  100,000

Gary Hoffman

                  

ISOP

  1,320,000    780,000    540,000  4.51  12/03/04  22/03/14  540,000

Chris Lucasd

                  

                  

Frits Seegersd

                  

                  

Former Director

                  

Naguib Kheraj

                  

ESOS

  60,000        60,000  3.97  14/08/01  13/08/08  60,000

ISOP

  1,360,000    840,000    520,000  4.47  12/03/04  31/12/08  520,000

Notes

aUnder ESOS, options granted (at market value) to executives were exercisable only if the growth in Barclays earnings per share over the three-year period was at least equal to the percentage increase in the UK Retail Prices Index plus 6% over the same period. The performance condition for the 1999 ESOS grant was met.

 

b

Sharepurchase

Under ISOP, executives were awarded options (at market value) over Barclays shares which are normally exercisable after three years. The number of shares over which options can be exercised depends upon performance against specific performance conditions. For ISOP awards granted in 2000 to 2003, the first 40,000 target shares under option for each award was subject to an EP performance condition, tested over a period of three years. Any amount over 40,000 target shares was subject to a relative TSR performance condition, to be tested initially over three years. Because the TSR performance condition was not met over three years in relation to the awards in 2003, the TSR condition was tested over a period of four years from the original start date. Awards in 2004 were subject to a relative TSR performance condition. For the 2003 and 2004 grants under ISOP, which became exercisable in 2007, Barclays was ranked 6th in the peer group under the TSR performance condition. This was sufficient for only 25% of the maximum number of shares under the TSR condition to vest. The remaining 75% lapsed.

 

c

Yes

Robert E Diamond Jr received a grant under the BGI EOP in March 2004. He was not a Director of Barclays PLC at that time. The BGI EOP is an option plan, approved by shareholders in 2000 and offered predominantly to participants in the US. Under the BGI EOP, participants receive an option to purchase shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited. The exercise price is based on the fair value at the time of grant. The option normally vests in three equal tranches on the first, second, and third anniversary of the date of grant. Participants must, in accordance with the Articles of Association of Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited, keep their shares for 355 days after the date of exercise, before they may be offered for sale. In line with market practice, the options were not subject to performance conditions. Robert E Diamond Jr is not eligible to receive further awards under the BGI EOP. The shares shown in respect of the BGI EOP in the above table are shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited.

 

dFrits Seegers was appointed as an executive Director on 10th July 2006, and Chris Lucas on 1st April 2007, and therefore no participation in the above plans has been offered to them.

–   Sharepurchase is an HMRC approved share incentive plan under which all employees in the UK (including executive Directors) are invited to participate.

–   Participants may purchase up to £1,500 shares each tax year. To encourage employee share ownership, Barclays matches the first £600 of shares purchased by participants on a one-for-one basis. Dividends are also earned in the form of additional shares.

eNothing was paid by the participants on the grant of options.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

141
  

–   Purchased shares may be withdrawn from the plan any time. Matching and dividend shares must be held in trust for three years before release, but may be kept in trust for five years.

–   On cessation of employment participants must withdraw all shares and depending on the reason for and timing of cessation, the matching shares may be forfeited.


–   On a change of control, participants are able to instruct the Sharepurchase trustee how to act or vote on their behalf.

Directors: interests–   The plan was approved for a ten year period by shareholders in ordinary shares of Barclays PLCaApril 2000.

 

   At 1st January 2007b  At 31st December 2007
    Beneficial  Non-
beneficial
  Beneficial  Non-
beneficial

Group Chairman

        

Marcus Agius

  15,000    86,136  

Executive Directors

        

John Varley

  375,053    470,650  

Robert E Diamond Jre

  2,531,582    3,402,192  

Gary Hoffman

  319,186    431,761  

Chris Lucasf

      38,003  

Frits Seegersd

  4,319    699,870  

Non-executive Directorsc

        

David Boothg

      50,374  

Sir Richard Broadbent

  8,092    14,026  

Leigh Clifford

  5,219    18,872  

Fulvio Conti

  2,538    10,067  

Dr Danie Cronjéd

  3,547    5,146  

Professor Dame Sandra Dawson

  9,953    12,040  

Sir Andrew Likierman

  5,441    8,137  

Sir Nigel Rudd

  51,117    84,843  

Stephen Russell

  18,661    21,054  

Sir John Sunderland

  10,054    31,658  

Notes

aBeneficial interests in the table above represent shares held by Directors who were on the Board as at 31st December 2007, either directly or through a nominee, their spouse and children under 18. They include any interests held through Sharepurchase, but do not include any awards under ESAS, ISOP, PSP, ESOS and Sharesave. The beneficial interests in ordinary shares of Barclays PLC held by all Directors as shown in the table above amounted in aggregate to 5,384,829 ordinary shares of Barclays PLC as at 31st December 2007 and 5,398,797 ordinary shares of Barclays PLC as at 27th February 2008 (which amounted to less than 1% of Barclays PLC ordinary share capital outstanding as at 31st December 2007 and 27th February 2008 respectively). Note 42 provides further information on Directors’ and Officers’ shareholdings. As at 31st December 2007, the executive Directors, together with other senior executives, were potential beneficiaries in respect of a total of 207,685,698 Barclays PLC ordinary shares (1st January 2007: 165,645,889) held by the trustees of the Barclays EBTs. As at 27th February 2008, a total of 218,235,925 shares were held by the trustees.

 

bOr date appointed to the Board if later.

cOn 19th February 2008, the non-executive Directors acquired ordinary shares pursuant to arrangements under which part of each non-executive Director’s fee is used to buy shares in Barclays. Barclays shares were acquired by each non-executive Director as follows: David Booth – 1,183; Sir Richard Broadbent – 1,487; Leigh Clifford – 1,312; Fulvio Conti – 1,401; Dr Danie Cronjé – 1,270; Professor Dame Sandra Dawson – 1,485; Sir Andrew Likierman – 1,353; Sir Michael Rake – 204; Sir Nigel Rudd – 1,646; Stephen Russell – 1,600; Sir John Sunderland – 1,231; Patience Wheatcroft – 169. On 19th February 2008, Sir Michael Rake also acquired 1,100 ordinary shares in Barclays. On 26th February 2008, Patience Wheatcroft acquired 1,200 ordinary shares in Barclays and Sir Nigel Rudd sold 28,000 ordinary shares in Barclays and acquired 28,000 ordinary shares in Barclays in PEP and ISA accounts. Except as described in this note, there were no changes to the beneficial or non-beneficial interests of Directors in the period 31st December 2007 to 27th February 2008.

dAs at 1st January 2007, Frits Seegers and Dr Danie Cronjé held 1,000 and 101,577 shares in Absa Group Limited respectively. As at 31st December 2007, Frits Seegers and Dr Danie Cronjé held 1,000 and 101,577 shares in Absa Group Limited respectively. Dr Danie Cronjé also held 7,500 non-cumulative, non-redeemable preference shares in Absa Bank Limited as at 1st January 2007 and 11,700 such shares as at 31st December 2007.

eAs at 1st January 2007 and 31st December 2007, Robert E Diamond Jr held 200,000 ‘A’ ordinary shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited.

fAppointed as an executive Director on 1st April 2007.

gAppointed as a non-executive Director on 1st May 2007.

142

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

 

Corporate governanceTable 25: New Plans under which awards are to be made 2009

Plan nameExecutive
Directors
Eligible?
Description
BGI Equity Participation PlanNo

–   The BGI Equity Participation Plan is a share plan under which awards linked to the value of BGI shares may be made to selected BGI employees (excluding executive Directors) in the form of either stock appreciation rights settled in shares or restricted share awards.

–   Awards normally vest in three equal tranches following the first, second and third anniversary of grant provided there has been no significant deterioration in the performance of Barclays, with delivery in Barclays shares.

–   On cessation of employment awards normally vest for eligible leavers (as defined) provided there has been no significant deterioration in the performance of Barclays; for other leavers, awards will normally lapse.

–   On a change of control awards may vest provided there has been no significant deterioration in the performance of Barclays.

Accountability and auditLong Term

Going concernCash Plan (LTCP)

No

–   LTCP is a new forward looking plan introduced initially for 2009, under which conditional awards of cash are made to eligible employees, (excluding executive Directors).

–   Awards are released in portions over a period of time (two years for 2009 awards), subject to continued employment. At the time of the final release, for 2009 awards, a service credit (10% of the initial value of the award) is added.

–   Participants must normally be in employment at the time of release in order to receive each portion of the payment.

–   Participants who leave employment before the release date of any portion of the award will normally forfeit any outstanding amounts. For categories of eligible leavers an award will vest, pro rated for time in service.

–   On a change of control awards may vest at the discretion of the Committee.

170

Barclays

The Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Share and Long Term Incentive Plans (continued)

Table 26: Plans under which awards not made in 2008

Plan nameExecutive
Directors confirm they are satisfied that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the ‘going concern’ basis for preparing the accounts.
Eligible?
Description

ISOP

Internal control(Incentive Share Option Plan)

Yes

–   The DirectorsIncentive Share Option Plan is a share option plan under which share options were granted to selected employees (including executive Directors). No options have responsibility for ensuring that management maintain an effective systembeen granted since 2004.

–   ISOP contains HMRC approved and unapproved parts.

–   Options were awarded at the market price at the date of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. Such a system is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives, and can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

Throughout the year ended 31st December 2007, and to date, the Group has operated a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance of effective and efficient operations covering all controls, including financial and operational controls and compliance with laws and regulations. Processes are in place for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks facing the Groupgrant calculated in accordance with the guidance ‘Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code’ published by the Financial Reporting Council. The Board regularly reviews these processes through the Board Committees.

The Directors review the effectivenessrules of the system of internal control semi-annually. An internal control compliance certification process is conducted throughout the Group in support of this review. The effectiveness of controls is periodically reviewed within the business areas. Regular reports are made to the Board Audit Committee by management, Internal Auditplan.

–   Options granted had an EP threshold and the compliancea TSR performance condition associated with them. Options were normally exercisable between three and legal functions covering particularly financial controls, compliance and operational controls. The Board Audit Committee monitors resolution of any identified control issues of Group level significance through to a satisfactory conclusion.

The Group Internal Control and Assurance Framework (GICAF) describes the Group’s approach to internal control and details Group policies and processes. The GICAF is reviewed and approved on behalften years of the Group Chief Executivegrant date.

–   All options granted which met these performance criteria have now vested and are exercisable.

–   On cessation of employment eligible leavers (as defined) normally are able to exercise their options; for other leavers, options normally lapse.

–   On a change of control options would remain exercisable for a specified period.

–   The plan was approved for a ten year period by the Group Governance and Control Committee.shareholders in April 2000.

Quarterly risk reports are made to the Board covering risks of Group significance including credit risk, market risk and operational risk, including legal and compliance risk. Reports covering risk measurement standards and risk appetite are made to the Board Risk Committee. Further details of risk management procedures are given in the Risk management section on pages 65 to 96.

ESOS

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting(Executive Share

Option Scheme)

n/a

–   The management of Barclays PLC is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Barclays PLC’s internal control over financial reportingExecutive Share Option Scheme is a process designedshare option plan under which share options were granted to selected employees (including executive Directors). No options have been granted since 2000.

–   Options were awarded at the supervisionmarket price at the date of Barclays PLC’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposesgrant calculated in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) asthe rules of the plan.

–   Options were normally exercisable between three and ten years of the grant date. All options are now vested.

–   On cessation of employment eligible leavers (as defined) normally are able to exercise their option pro-rated for performance; for other leavers, options normally lapse.

–   On a change of control options remain exercisable for a specified period.

–   The plan was adopted for a ten year period by shareholders in 1990.

BGI EOP

(BGI Equity

Ownership Plan)

No

–   BGI is Barclays asset management business headquartered in San Francisco. The BGI Equity Ownership Plan (BGI EOP) was approved by shareholders at Barclays 2000 AGM to provide the European Unionemployee share incentive arrangements required to recruit and published byretain the International Accounting Standards Board.

Barclays PLC’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenancequality of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRSs and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations ofsenior management and investment talent appropriate for building a global investment management business.

–   The BGI EOP was designed to provide participants with a long-term equity interest in BGI to meet the Directorsexpectations of, Barclays PLC; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of Barclays PLC’s assets that could have a material effect on Barclays PLC’s financial statements.

Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of Barclays PLC’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31st December 2007. In making its assessment, management has utilised the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Management concluded that based on its assessment, Barclays PLC’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of 31st December 2007.

The system of internal financial and operational controls is also subject to regulatory oversightparticular, BGI’s key investment talent in the United Kingdom and overseas. Further information on supervision by the financial services regulators is provided under Supervision and RegulationStates, who could expect to participate in the Risk management section on page 110.

Statementequity of Directors’ responsibilities for accounts

The following statement, which should be read in conjunction withtheir employer. Under the Auditors’ report set out on page 147, is made with a view to distinguishing for shareholders the respective responsibilitiesterms of the Directors andBGI EOP, options were granted at fair value to key BGI employees over shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited (BGI Holdings) within an overall cap of the auditors in relation to the accounts.

The Directors are required by the Companies Act 1985 to prepare accounts for each financial year and, with regards to Group accounts, in accordance with Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. The Directors have prepared individual accounts in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The accounts are required by law and IFRSs to present fairly the financial position of the Company and the Group and the performance for that period; the Companies Act 1985 provides, in relation to such accounts, that references in the relevant part of the law to accounts giving a true and fair view are references, to their achieving fair presentation.

The Directors consider that, in preparing the accounts on pages 149 to 249, and the additional information contained on pages 250 to 274, the Group has used appropriate accounting policies, supported by reasonable judgements and estimates, and that all accounting standards which they consider to be applicable have been followed.

The Directors have responsibility for ensuring that the Company and the Group keep accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy the financial position of the Company and the Group and which enable them to ensure that the accounts comply with the Companies Act 1985.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

143


Corporate governance

Accountability and audit

The Directors have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.

Disclosure controls and procedures

The Group Chief Executive, John Varley, and the Group Finance Director, Chris Lucas, conducted with Group Management an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures as at 31st December 2007, which are defined as those controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarised and reported within the time periods specified in the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. As of the date of the evaluation, the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. The Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director also concluded that no significant changes were made in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to their evaluation.

Signed on behalf of the Board

LOGO

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

7th March 2008

144

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

Financial statements

Presentation of information

146
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Barclays PLC
147
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Barclays Bank PLC
148

Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

149

Accounting policies

149

Accounting presentation

158

Consolidated income statement

160

Consolidated balance sheet

161

Statement of recognised income and expense

162

Consolidated cash flow statement

163

Parent company accounts

164

Notes to the accounts

166

Barclays Bank PLC accounts

250

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

145


LOGO

Presentation of information

Presentation of Information

Barclays PLC is a public limited company registered in England under company number 48839. The Company, originally named Barclay & Company Limited, was incorporated in England and Wales on 20th July 1896 under the Companies Acts 1862 to 1890 as a company limited by shares. The company name was changed to Barclays Bank Limited on 17th February 1917 and it was reregistered in 1982 as a public limited company under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1980. On 1st January 1985, the company changed its name to Barclays PLC.

Barclays Bank PLC is a public limited company registered in England under company number 1026167. The Bank was incorporated on 7th August 1925 under the Colonial Bank Act 1925 and on 4th October 1971 was registered as a company limited by shares under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1967. Pursuant to The Barclays Bank Act 1984, on 1st January 1985 the Bank was reregistered as a public limited company and its name was changed from Barclays Bank International Limited to Barclays Bank PLC.

All20% of the issued ordinary share capital of BGI Holdings.

–   No options were granted under the BGI EOP in 2008 and no further options will be granted. The plan will not be renewed in 2010 when it comes to the end of its life.

–   All grants of options were approved by the Committee. The Committee is also advised of option exercises and share sales by employees. Employees who were executive Directors of Barclays PLC at the date of grant were not eligible to receive options under the BGI EOP.

–   In summary the BGI EOP operated as follows:

–   certain key BGI employees were granted options over shares in BGI Holdings;

–   the option exercise price was based on the fair value of a BGI Holdings share at the date of grant determined by an independent appraiser;

–   the options generally vest evenly over a three-year period and can be exercised during the exercise windows which generally occur twice annually;

–   option holders are required to fund the exercise without any financial support from any member of the Barclays Group.

–   Once employees become shareholders, they are subject to the Articles of BGI Holdings under which:

–   shareholders are required to hold the shares for a minimum of 355 days. As shareholders, employees derive the full risks and rewards of ownership, including voting rights and entitlement to any ordinary dividends paid by BGI Holdings;

–   on expiry of the minimum holding period, shareholders may, but are not obliged to, offer their shares for sale to Barclays Bank PLC during the sales windows which generally occur twice annually;

–   Barclays Bank PLC, at its discretion, has a right to purchase shares so offered, but is not obliged to do so.

–   The table below contains information on the number of shares in BGI Holdings over which options were granted, outstanding and exercised in 2007 and 2008:

    

Year

  

Number
granted
during year

(000s)

  

Number
outstanding
at year end

(000s)

  

Number
exercised

(000s)

            
  2007  2,599  7,502  1,632        
  2008    6,584  550        

–   In 2008 BGI employees exercised options over 0.5m (2007: 1.6m) shares for consideration of £19m (2007: £57m); Barclays Bank PLC purchased 1.8m (2007: 4.9m) shares offered for sale by shareholders for consideration of £157m (2007: £488m). As at 31st December 2008, employees owned by 4.5% of BGI Holdings (2007: 5.9%).

Barclays PLC. The

Annual Report 2008

171


Corporate governance

Remuneration Report

Share and Long Term Incentive Plans (continued)

Table 26: Plans under which awards not made in 2008 (continued)

Plan name

Executive Directors Eligible?Description

BGI EOP – Accounting and disclosure

–   The BGI EOP is accounted for as an equity settled share-based payment in accordance with IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’. The fair value of the services received from the employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the share options granted on the date of the grant. The cost of the employee services received in respect of the share options granted is recognised in the income statement over the period that the services are received.

–   The cost for 2008 of £30.9m (2007: £54.8m, 2006: £37.4m) is included in staff costs in Note 8 to the accounts. In accordance with IFRS 2, details of share options granted and exercised, together with weighted average fair values at grant date and weighted average exercise prices are set out in Note 45 to the accounts. In accordance with IAS 33 ‘Earnings per Share’, unexercised options are taken into account in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as set out in Note 11 to the accounts.

–   For Group reporting, the exercise of options by employees is treated as a deemed disposal of interests in a subsidiary, as its holding in the subsidiary has been reduced for the consideration represented by the exercise price. Any subsequent purchase of shares offered for sale by employees is treated as a purchase of an additional investment in a subsidiary entity. The cash flows relating to these capital transactions are included in the consolidated cash flow statement and disclosed, along with other disposals and acquisitions, in Note 38 to the accounts and related movements in goodwill and minority interests are included in Notes 21 and 33 to the accounts respectively.

172

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Corporate governance

Accountability and audit

Going concern

The Group’s business activities and financial position; the factors likely to affect its future development and performance; and its objectives and policies in managing the financial risks to which it is exposed and its capital are discussed in the Business Review.

The Directors have assessed, in the light of current and anticipated economic conditions, the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Directors confirm they are satisfied that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the ‘going concern’ basis for preparing accounts.

Internal control

The Directors have responsibility for ensuring that management maintain an effective system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. Such a system is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. Throughout the year ended 31st December 2008, and to date, the Group has operated a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance of effective and efficient operations covering all controls, including financial and operational controls and compliance with laws and regulations. Processes are in place for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks facing the Group in accordance with the guidance ‘Internal Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code’ published by the Financial Reporting Council. The Board regularly reviews these processes through its principal Board Committees.

The Directors review the effectiveness of the system of internal control semi-annually. An internal control compliance certification process is conducted throughout the Group in support of this review. The effectiveness of controls is periodically reviewed within the business areas. Regular reports are made to the Board Audit Committee by management, Internal Audit and the compliance and legal functions covering particularly financial controls, compliance and operational controls. The Board Audit Committee monitors resolution of any identified control issues of Group level significance through to a satisfactory conclusion.

The Group Internal Control and Assurance Framework (GICAF) describes the Group’s approach to internal control and details Group policies and processes. The GICAF is reviewed and approved on behalf of the Group Chief Executive by the Group Governance and Control Committee.

Quarterly risk reports are made to the Board covering risks of Group significance including credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Reports covering risk measurement standards and risk appetite are made to the Board Risk Committee. Further details of risk management procedures are given in the Risk management section on pages 57 to 136.

Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC (collectively “Management”) are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the principal executive and principal financial officers of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and the respective Directors of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of the assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements of Barclays PLC or Barclays Bank PLC, as the case may be.

Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of Barclays PLC’s and Barclays Bank PLC’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2008. In making its assessment, Management has utilised the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Management concluded that, based on its assessment, the internal control over financial reporting of each of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC was effective as of 31 December 2008.

Management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include internal controls relating to certain of the Lehman Brothers North American investment banking and capital markets businesses acquired from Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September 2008. These businesses have been included in consolidated financial statements of both Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC for the year ended 31 December 2008. The businesses which have not been included in management’s assessment represented approximately 1.1% of the Group income and 0.2% of the total Group assets for the year ended and as at 31 December 2008.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report on Barclays PLC’s internal control over financial reporting which is set out on page 177.

This annual report does not include a report of our registered public accounting firm on Barclays Bank PLC’s internal control over financial reporting. Barclays Bank PLC’s internal control over financial reporting is not subject to assessment by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit Barclays Bank PLC to provide only the management’s report in this annual report.

The system of internal financial and operational controls is also subject to regulatory oversight in the United Kingdom and overseas. Further information on supervision by the financial services regulators is provided under Supervision and Regulation in the Risk Management section on pages 135-136. The Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director also concluded that no significant changes were made to our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to their evaluation.

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities for accounts

The following statement, which should be read in conjunction with the Auditors’ report set out on page 177, is made with a view to distinguishing for shareholders the respective responsibilities of the Directors and of the auditors in relation to the accounts.

The Directors are required by the Companies Act 1985 to prepare accounts for each financial year and, with regards to Group accounts, in accordance with Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. The Directors have prepared individual accounts in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The accounts are required by law and IFRSs to present fairly the financial position of the Company and the Group and the performance for that period. The Companies Act 1985 provides, in relation to such accounts, that references to accounts giving a true and fair view are references to fair presentation.

The Directors consider that, in preparing the accounts on pages 179 to 284, and the additional information contained on pages 315 to 323, the Group has used appropriate accounting policies, supported by reasonable judgements and estimates, and that all accounting standards which they consider to be applicable have been followed.

The Directors have responsibility for ensuring that the Company and the Group keep accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy the financial position of the Company and the Group and which enable them to ensure that the accounts comply with the Companies Act 1985.

The Directors have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.


BarclaysAnnual Report 2008173


Corporate governance

Accountability and audit

Disclosure controls and procedures Sec 20F Item 15(a)

The Group Chief Executive, John Varley, and the Group Finance Director, Chris Lucas, conducted with Group Management an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Group’s disclosure controls and procedures as at 31st December 2008, which are defined as those controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarised and reported within the time periods specified in the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. As of the date of the evaluation, the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge that:

(a) The financial statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of Barclays PLC and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole; and

(b) The management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of Barclays PLC and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.

Signed on behalf of the Board

LOGO
Marcus Agius
Group Chairman
5th March 2009

174

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Financial statements
Presentation of information176
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Barclays PLC also contains the consolidated accounts of, and other information relating to, Barclays Bank PLC. Except where otherwise indicated, the information given is identical with respect to both Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC.

The term ‘Companies Act 1985’ means the company law provisions

177
Report of the Companies Act 1985 (as amended) that remain in force. The term ‘Companies Act 2006’ meansIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm
to the operative company law provisionsBoard of the Companies Act 2006.

The accountsDirectors and Shareholders of Barclays Bank PLC included in this document do not comprise statutory

178
Consolidated accounts within the meaningBarclays PLC179
Accounting policies179
Accounting developments188
Consolidated income statement190
Consolidated balance sheet191
Consolidated statement of Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The statutoryrecognised income and expense192
Consolidated cash flow statement193
Parent company accounts of Barclays Bank PLC,

194
Notes to the Registrar of Companies in accordance with Section 242 of that Act and are published as a separate document.

accounts

196
The term ‘Barclays PLC Group’ means Barclays PLC together with its subsidiaries and the term ‘Barclays Bank PLC Group’ means Barclays Bank PLC together with its subsidiaries. ‘Barclays’ and ‘Group’ are terms which are used to refer to either of the preceding groups when the subject matter is identical. The term ‘Company’ or ‘parent Company’ refers to data285

Barclays PLC and the term ‘Bank’ refers

Annual Report 2008

175


Presentation of information

Barclays PLC is a public limited company registered in England under company number 48839. The Company, originally named Barclay & Company Limited, was incorporated in England and Wales on 20th July 1896 under the Companies Acts 1862 to 1890 as a company limited by shares. The company name was changed to Barclays Bank Limited on 17th February 1917 and it was reregistered in 1982 as a public limited company under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1980. On 1st January 1985, the company changed its name to Barclays PLC.

Barclays Bank PLC is a public limited company registered in England under company number 1026167. The Bank was incorporated on 7th August 1925 under the Colonial Bank Act 1925 and on 4th October 1971 was registered as a company limited by shares under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1967. Pursuant to The Barclays Bank Act 1984, on 1st January 1985 the Bank was reregistered as a public limited company and its name was changed from Barclays Bank PLC. The term ‘Absa Group Limited’ is used to refer to Absa Group Limited and its subsidiaries and the term ‘Absa’ is used to refer to the component of the International Limited to Barclays Bank PLC.

All of the issued ordinary share capital of Barclays Bank PLC is owned by Barclays PLC. The Annual Report for Barclays PLC also contains the consolidated accounts of, and other information relating to, Barclays Bank PLC. The Annual Report includes information required to be included in the Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC Annual Report on Form 20-F for 2008. Form 20-F will contain as exhibits certificates pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, with respect to both Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC. Except where otherwise indicated, the information given is identical with respect to both Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC.

The term ‘Companies Act 1985’ means the company law provisions of the Companies Act 1985 (as amended) that remain in force. The term ‘Companies Act 2006’ means the operative company law provisions of the Companies Act 2006.

The accounts of Barclays Bank PLC included in this document do not comprise statutory accounts within the meaning of Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The statutory accounts of Barclays Bank PLC, which contain an unqualified audit report and do not contain any statement under Section 237(2) or (3) of that Act, will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies in accordance with Section 242 of that Act and are published as a separate document.

The term ‘Barclays PLC Group’ means Barclays PLC together with its subsidiaries and the term ‘Barclays Bank PLC Group’ means Barclays Bank PLC together with its subsidiaries. ‘Barclays’ and ‘Group’ are terms which are used to refer to either of the preceding groups when the subject matter is identical. The term ‘Company’ or ‘parent Company’ refers to Barclays PLC and the term ‘Bank’ refers to Barclays Bank PLC. The term ‘Absa Group Limited’ is used to refer to Absa Group Limited and its subsidiaries and the term ‘Absa’ is used to refer to the component of the Global Retail and Commercial Banking segment represented by this business. In this report, the abbreviations ‘£m’ and ‘£bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of pounds sterling respectively; the abbreviations ‘US$m’ and ‘US$bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of US Dollars respectively and ‘m’ and ‘bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of euros respectively.

Statutory Accounts

The consolidated accounts of Barclays PLC and its subsidiaries are set out on pages 149179 to 249284 along with the accounts of Barclays PLC itself on page 164.208. The consolidated accounts of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries are set out on pages 250285 to 262.298. The accounting policies on pages 149179 to 157187 and the Notes commencing on page 166196 apply equally to both sets of accounts unless otherwise stated.

Adoption of IFRS and 2004 comparatives

The Group adopted the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards (collectively IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union in 2005. As permitted by IFRS 1, the accounting standards relating to financial instruments and insurance contracts have not been applied to 2004. Therefore, the 2004 comparatives are significantly different from the numbers reported in later years. n/a has been included in tables where, as a result of the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 in later years and UK GAAP in 2004, the disclosure is not applicable.


 

146176 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s report

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Barclays PLC

In our opinion, the accompanying Consolidated income statements and the related Consolidated balance sheets, Consolidated statements of recognised income and expense and, Consolidated statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Barclays PLC (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries at 31st December 20072008 and 31st December 20062007 and the results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31st December 2007,2008, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also, in our opinion the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31st December 2007,2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (‘COSO’). The Company’s management are responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in ‘Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting’ as it pertains to Barclays PLC in the section headed Accountability‘Accountability and audit.audit’. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits which were integrated in 2007 and 2006.audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the

risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in ‘Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting’, management has excluded certain of the Lehman Brothers North American investment banking and capital markets businesses acquired from Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of 31st December 2008 as they were acquired in a purchase business combination in September 2008. We have also excluded certain of the Lehman Brothers North American investment banking and capital markets businesses, acquired from Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. These businesses represented approximately 1.1% of group income and 0.2% of the total Group assets for the year ended 31st December 2008.

LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors

London, United Kingdom

7th5th March 20082009


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 147
 177


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Barclays Bank PLC:

In our opinion, the accompanying Consolidated income statements and the related Consolidated balance sheets, Consolidated statements of recognised income and expense and Consolidated statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries at 31st December 20072008 and 31st December 2006,2007, and the results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31st December 20072008 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants and Registered AuditorsLondon

London, United Kingdom

10th5th March 20082009

 

148178 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

Consolidated Accountsaccounts Barclays PLC

Accounting Policiespolicies

Significant Accounting Policiesaccounting policies

1. Reporting entity

These financial statements are prepared for the Barclays PLC Group (‘Barclays’ or ‘the Group’) under Section 227(2) of the Companies Act 1985. The Group is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail and commercial banking, credit cards, investment banking, wealth management and investment management services. In addition, individual financial statements have been prepared for the holding company, Barclays PLC (‘the Company’), under Section 226(2)(b) of the Companies Act 1985.

Barclays PLC is a public limited company, incorporated in Great Britain and having a registered office in England.

2. Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards

The consolidated financial statements of the Barclays PLC Group, and the individual financial statements of Barclays PLC, have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They are also in accordance with IFRSs and IFRIC interpretations as adopted by the European Union.

IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instrument Disclosures’ and an amendment to IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’ on capital disclosures were implemented in 2007, resulting in new or revised disclosures.

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated and individual financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied.

3. Basis of preparation

The consolidated and individual financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention modified to include the fair valuation of certain financial instruments and contracts to buy or sell non-financial items and trading inventories to the extent required or permitted under accounting standards and as set out in the relevant accounting polices. They are stated in millions of pounds Sterling (£m), the currency of the country in which Barclays PLC is incorporated.

Critical accounting estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRSIFRSs requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgement in the process of applying the accounting policies. The notes to the financial statements set out areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions are significant to the consolidated and individual financial statements such as fair value of financial instruments (Note 49)50), allowance for impairment (Note 47), goodwill (Note 21), intangible assets (Note 22), and retirement benefit obligations (Note 30).

4. Consolidation

Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements combine the financial statements of Barclays PLC and all its subsidiaries, including certain special purpose entities (SPEs) where appropriate, made up to 31st December. Entities qualify as subsidiaries where the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered in assessing whether the Group controls another entity. Details of the principal subsidiaries are given in Note 40.41.

SPEs are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the Group and that entity indicates control. Potential indicators of control as set out in SIC 12 ‘Consideration – Special Purpose Entities’, include, amongst others, an assessment of the Group’s exposure to the risks and benefits of the SPE.

This assessment of risks and benefits is based on arrangements in place and the assessed risk exposures at inception. The initial assessment is reconsidered at a later date if:

a)the Group acquires additional interests in the entity;

b)the contractual arrangements of the entity are amended such that the relative exposure to risks and benefits change; or

c)if the Group acquires control over the main operating and financial decisions of the entity.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date that control ceases.

The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the purchase of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured at the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed, plus any costs directly related to the acquisition.

The excess of the cost of an acquisition over the Group’s share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. See accounting policy 14 for the accounting policy for goodwill. A gain on acquisition is recognised in profit or loss if there is an excess of the Group’s share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired over the cost of the acquisition. Intra-group transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation and consistent accounting policies are used throughout the Group for the purposes of the consolidation.

As the consolidated financial statements include partnerships where a Group member is a partner, advantage has been taken of the exemption of Regulation 7 of the Partnerships and Unlimited Companies (Accounts) Regulations 1993 with regard to the preparation and filing of individual partnership financial statements.

In the individual financial statements, investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less impairment, if any.

Associates and joint ventures

An associate is an entity in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial management policy decisions. This is generally demonstrated by the Group holding in excess of 20%, but no more than 50%, of the voting rights.

A joint venture exists where the Group has a contractual arrangement with one or more parties to undertake activities typically, though not necessarily, through entities which are subject to joint control.

Unless designated as at fair value through profit and loss as set out in policy 7, the Group’s investments in associates and joint ventures are initially recorded at cost and increased (or decreased) each year by the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profit (or loss), or other movements reflected directly in the equity of the associated or jointly controlled entity. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of an associate or joint venture is included in the carrying amount of the investment (net of any accumulated impairment loss). When the Group’s share of losses or other reductions in equity in an associate or joint venture equals or exceeds the recorded interest, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the entity.

The Group’s share of the results of associates and joint ventures is based on financial statements made up to a date not earlier than three months before the balance sheet date, adjusted to conform with the accounting polices of the Group. Unrealised gains on transactions are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of impairment in the asset transferred.

In the individual financial statements, investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures are stated at cost less impairment, if any.

5. Foreign currency translation

The consolidated and individual financial statements are presented in Sterling, which is the functional currency of the parent company. Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using their functional currency, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates.

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the appropriate functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate prevailing at the period end. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the retranslation and settlement of these items are recognised in the income statement except for qualifying cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments. See policy 12 for the policies on hedge accounting.

Non-monetary assets that are measured at fair value are translated using the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Exchange differences on equities and similar non-monetary items held at fair value through profit or loss, are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on equities classified as available for sale financial assets and non-monetary items are included directly in equity.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 149
 179


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Accounting policies

 

For the purposes of translation into the presentational currency, assets, liabilities and equity of foreign operations are translated at the closing rate, and items of income and expense are translated into Sterling at the rates prevailing on the dates of the transactions, or average rates of exchange where these approximate to actual rates.

The exchange differences arising on the translation of a foreign operation are included in cumulative translation reserves within shareholders’ equity and included in the profit or loss on disposal or partial disposal of the operation.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of foreign subsidiaries are maintained in the functional currency of the foreign operation, translated at the closing rate and are included in hedges of net investments where appropriate.

On transition to IFRS, the Group brought forward a nil opening balance on the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment arising from the retranslation of foreign operations, which is shown as a separate item in shareholders’ equity.

6. Interest, fees and commissions

Interest

Interest is recognised in interest income and interest expense in the income statement for all interest bearing financial instruments classified as held to maturity, available for sale or other loans and receivables using the effective interest method.

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or liability (or group of assets and liabilities) and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts the expected future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument, or when appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the instrument. The application of the method has the effect of recognising income (and expense) receivable (or payable) on the instrument evenly in proportion to the amount outstanding over the period to maturity or repayment.

In calculating effective interest, the Group estimates cash flows (using projections based on its experience of customers’ behaviour) considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument but excluding future credit losses. Fees, including those for early redemption, are included in the calculation to the extent that they can be measured and are considered to be an integral part of the effective interest rate. Cash flows arising from the direct and incremental costs of issuing financial instruments are also taken into account in the calculation. Where it is not possible to otherwise estimate reliably the cash flows or the expected life of a financial instrument, effective interest is calculated by reference to the payments or receipts specified in the contract, and the full contractual term.

Fees and commissions

Unless included in the effective interest calculation, fees and commissions are recognised on an accruals basis as the service is provided. Fees and commissions not integral to effective interest arising from negotiating, or participating in the negotiation of a transaction from a third party, such as the acquisition of loans, shares or other securities or the purchase or sale of businesses, are recognised on completion of the underlying transaction. Portfolio and other management advisory and service fees are recognised based on the applicable service contracts. Asset management fees related to investment funds are recognised over the period the service is provided. The same principle is applied to the recognition of income from wealth management, financial planning and custody services that are continuously provided over an extended period of time.

Commitment fees, together with related direct costs, for loan facilities where draw down is probable are deferred and recognised as an adjustment to the effective interest on the loan once drawn. Commitment fees in relation to facilities where draw down is not probable are recognised over the term of the commitment.

Insurance premiums

Insurance premiums are recognised in the period earned.

Net trading income

Income arises from the margins which are achieved through market-making and customer business and from changes in marketfair value caused by movements in interest and exchange rates, equity prices and other market variables. Trading positions are held at fair value and the resulting gains and losses are included in the income statement, together with interest and dividends arising from long and short positions and funding costs relating to trading activities.

Dividends from subsidiaries

In the individual financial statements of Barclays PLC, dividends from subsidiaries are accounted for onrecognised when the basis ofright to receive payment is established, which is when the dividends are received inor when the accounting period.dividends are appropriately authorised by the subsidiary.

7. Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets

The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss; loans and receivables; held to maturity investments and available for sale financial assets. Management determines the classification of financial assets and liabilities at initial recognition.

Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss

Financial instruments are classified in this category if they are held for trading, or if they are designated by management under the fair value option. Instruments are classified as held for trading if they are:

 

(i)a)acquired principally for the purposes of selling or repurchasing in the near term;

 

(ii)b)part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking; or

 

(iii)c)a derivative, except for a derivative that is a financial guarantee contract or a designated and effective hedging instrument.

Financial instruments cannot be transferred into orIt is not possible to transfer a financial instrument out of this category whilst it is held or issued with the exception of non-derivative financial assets held for trading which may be transferred out of this category from 1st July 2008 after inception. initial classification where:

a)in rare circumstances, it is no longer held for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term, or

b)it is no longer held for the purpose of trading, it would have met the definition of a loan and receivable on initial classification and the Group has the intention and ability to hold it for the foreseeable future or until maturity.

Financial instruments included in this category are recognised initially at fair value and transaction costs are taken directly to the income statement. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are included directly in the income statement. The instruments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and the transfer qualifies for derecognition.

Regular way purchases and sales of financial instruments held for trading or designated under the fair value option are recognised on trade date, being the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.

The fair value option is used in the following circumstances:

 

(i)a)financial assets backing insurance contracts and financial assets backing investment contracts are designated at fair value through profit or loss because the related liabilities have cash flows that are contractually based on the performance of the assets or the related liabilities are insurance contracts whose measurement incorporates current information. Fair valuing the assets through profit and loss significantly reduces the recognition inconsistencies that would arise if the financial assets were classified as available for sale;

 

150180 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

 

(ii)b)financial assets, loans to customers, financial liabilities, financial guarantees and structured notes may be designated at fair value through profit or loss if they contain substantive embedded derivatives;

 

(iii)c)financial assets, loans to customers, financial liabilities, financial guarantees and structured notes may be designated at fair value through profit or loss where doing so significantly reduces measurement inconsistencies that would arise if the related derivatives were treated as held for trading and the underlying financial instruments were carried at amortised cost; and

 

(iv)d)certain private equity and other investments that are managed, and evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy and reported to key management personnel on that basis.

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and which are not classified as available for sale. Loans and receivables are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently valued at amortised cost, using the effective interest method (see accounting policy 6). They are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.

Regular way purchases and sales of loans and receivables are recognised on contractual settlement.

Held to maturity

Held to maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that the Group’s management has the intention and ability to hold to maturity. They are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently valued at amortised cost, using the effective interest method (see accounting policy 6). They are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired.

Regular way purchases of held to maturity financial assets are recognised on trade date, being the date on which the Group commits to purchase the asset.

Available for sale

Available for sale assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available for sale and are not categorised into any of the other categories described above. They are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently held at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are included as a separate component of equity until sale when the cumulative gain or loss is transferred to the income statement. Interest determined using the effective interest method (see accounting policy 6), impairment losses and translation differences on monetary items are recognised in the income statement. The assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.

Regular way purchases and sales of available for sale financial instruments are recognised on trade date, being the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.

A financial asset classified as available for sale that would have met the definition of loans and receivables may only be transferred from the available for sale classification where the Group has the intention and the ability to hold the asset for the foreseeable future or until maturity.

Embedded derivatives

Some hybrid contracts contain both a derivative and a non-derivative component. In such cases, the derivative component is termed an embedded derivative. Where the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivatives are not closely related to those of the host contract, and the host contract itself is not carried at fair value through profit or loss, the embedded derivative is bifurcated and reported at fair value with gains and losses being recognised in the income statement.

Profits or losses cannot be recognised on the initial recognition of embedded derivatives unless the host contract is also carried at fair value.

Loan commitments

Loan commitments, where the Group has a past practice of selling the resulting assets shortly after origination, are held at fair value through profit or loss. Other loan commitments are accounted for in accordance with policy 23.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost, except for trading liabilities and liabilities designated at fair value, which are held at fair value through profit or loss. Financial liabilities are derecognised when extinguished.

Determining fair value

Where the classification of a financial instrument requires it to be stated at fair value, fair value is determined by reference to a quoted market price for that instrument or by using a valuation model. Where the fair value is calculated using financial markets pricingvaluation models, the methodology is to calculate the expected cash flows under the terms of each specific contract and then discount these values back to a present value. These models use as their basis independently sourced market parameters including, for example, interest rate yield curves, equities and commodities prices, option volatilities and currency rates. For financial liabilities measured at fair value, the carrying amount is adjusted to reflectreflects the effect on fair value of changes in own credit spreads by applying the appropriate Barclays credit default swap spreads. Most market parameters are either directly observable or are implied from instrument prices. The model may perform numerical procedures in the pricing such as interpolation when input values do not directly correspond to the most actively traded market trade parameters. However, where valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the transaction price is deemed to provide the best evidence of initial fair value for accounting purposes. As such, profits or losses are recognised upon trade inception only when such profits can be measured solely by reference to observable market data. TheFor valuations that include significant unobservable inputs, the difference between the model valuation and the initial transaction price is recognised in profit or loss:

 

a)on a straight-line basis over the term of the transaction, or over the period until all model inputs will become observable where appropriate, or;

 

b)released in full where previously unobservable inputs become observable.

Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs and these may vary from product to product and change over time. Factors include for example, the depth of activity in the relevant market, the type of product, whether the product is new and not widely traded in the market place, the maturity of market modelling and the nature of the transaction (bespoke or generic). To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, the determination of fair value can be more subjective, dependant on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation. Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to similar assets, similar maturities or other analytical techniques.

8. Impairment of financial assets

The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that loans and receivables or available for sale financial investments are impaired. These are impaired and impairment losses are incurred if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more loss events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and prior to the balance sheet date (‘a loss event’) and that loss event or events has had an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the portfolio that can be reliably estimated. The criteria that the Group uses to determine that there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include:

 

a)significant financial difficulty of the issuer or obligor;

 

b)a breach of contract, such as a default or delinquency in interest or principal payments;

 

c)the lender, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty, granting to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider;

 

d)it becomes probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation;

 

e)the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 151
 181


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Accounting policies

 

f)observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a portfolio of financial assets since the initial recognition of those assets, although the decrease cannot yet be identified with the individual financial assets in the portfolio, including:

 

 (i)adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the portfolio;

 

 (ii)national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on the assets in the portfolio.

For loans and receivables the Group first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for loans and receivables that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for loans and receivables that are not individually significant. If the Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed loan and receivable, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a group of loans and receivables with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Loans and receivables that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.

The amount of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The amount of the loss is recognised using an allowance account and recognised in the income statement.

TheWhere appropriate, the calculation of the present value of the estimated future cash flows of a collateralised loan and receivable asset reflect the cash flows that may result from foreclosure costs for obtaining and selling the collateral, whether or not foreclosure is probable.

For the purposes of a collective evaluation of impairment, loans and receivables are grouped on the basis of similar risk characteristics, taking into account asset type, industry, geographical location, collateral type, past-due status and other relevant factors. These characteristics are relevant to the estimation of future cash flows for groups of such assets by being indicative of the counterparty’s ability to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the assets being evaluated.

Future cash flows in a group of loans and receivables that are collectively evaluated for impairment are estimated on the basis of the contractual cash flows of the assets in the group and historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the group. Historical loss experience is adjusted based on current observable data to reflect the effects of current conditions that did not affect the period on which the historical loss experience is based and to remove the effects of conditions in the historical period that do not currently exist.

The methodology and assumptions used for estimating future cash flows are reviewed regularly to reduce any differences between loss estimates and actual loss experience.

Following impairment, interest income is recognised using the original effective rate of interest which was used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.

When a loan is uncollectable, it is written off against the related allowance for loan impairment. Such loans are written off after all the necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited to the income statement.

If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognised in the income statement.

 

Equity securities acquired in exchange for loans in order to achieve an orderly realisation are accounted for as a disposal of the loan and an acquisition of equity securities. Where control is obtained over an entity as a result of the transaction, the entity is consolidated. Any further impairment of the assets or business acquired is treated as an impairment of the relevant asset or business and not as an impairment of the original instrument.

In the case of available for sale financial investments,equity securities, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost is also considered in determining whether impairment exists. Where such evidence exists, the cumulative net loss that has been previously recognised directly in equity is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement. In the case of debt instruments classified as available for sale, impairment is assessed based on the same criteria as all other financial assets. Reversals of impairment of debt instruments are recognised in the income statement. Reversals of impairment of equity shares are not recognised in the income statement, increases in the fair value of equity shares after impairment are recognised directly in equity.

9. Sale and repurchase agreements (including stock borrowing and lending)

Securities may be lent or sold subject to a commitment to repurchase them (a ‘repo’). Such securities are retained on the balance sheet when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership remain with the Group, and the counterparty liability is included separately on the balance sheet as appropriate.when cash consideration is received.

Similarly, where the Group borrows or purchases securities subject to a commitment to resell them (a ‘reverse repo’) but does not acquire the risks and rewards of ownership, the transactions are treated as collateralised loans when cash consideration is paid, and the securities are not included in the balance sheet.

The difference between sale and repurchase price is accrued over the life of the agreements using the effective interest method. Securities lent to counterparties are also retained in the financial statements. Securities borrowed are not recognised in the financial statements, unless these are sold to third parties, at which point the obligation to repurchase the securities is recorded as a trading liability at fair value and any subsequent gain or loss included in net trading income.

10. Securitisation transactions

Certain Group undertakings have issued debt securities or have entered into funding arrangements with lenders in order to finance specific loans and advances to customers.

All financial assets continue to be held on the Group balance sheet, and a liability recognised for the proceeds of the funding transaction, unless:

 

(i)a)substantially all the risks and rewards associated with the financial instruments have been transferred, in which case, the assets are derecognised in full; or

 

(ii)b)if a significant portion, but not all, of the risks and rewards have been transferred, the asset is derecognised entirely if the transferee has the ability to sell the financial asset, otherwise the asset continues to be recognised only to the extent of the Group’s continuing involvement.

Where (i)a) or (ii)b) above applies to a fully proportionate share of all or specifically identified cash flows, the relevant accounting treatment is applied to that proportion of the asset.


 

152182 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

 

11.Collateral and netting

11. Collateral and netting

The Group enters into master agreements with counterparties whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. Master agreements provide that, if an event of default occurs, all outstanding transactions with the counterparty will fall due and all amounts outstanding will be settled on a net basis.

Collateral

The Group obtains collateral in respect of customer liabilities where this is considered appropriate. The collateral normally takes the form of a lien over the customer’s assets and gives the Group a claim on these assets for both existing and future customer liabilities.

The Group also receives collateral in the form of cash or securities in respect of other credit instruments, such as stock borrowing contracts, and derivative contracts in order to reduce credit risk. Collateral received in the form of securities is not recorded on the balance sheet. Collateral received in the form of cash is recorded on the balance sheet with a corresponding liability. These items are assigned to deposits received from bank or other counterparties. Any interest payable or receivable arising is recorded as interest expense or interest income respectively except for funding costs relating to trading activities which are recorded in net trading income.

Netting

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet if, and only if, there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realise an asset and settle the liability simultaneously. In many cases, even though master netting agreements are in place, the lack of an intention to settle on a net basis results in the related assets and liabilities being presented gross in the balance sheet.

12. Hedge accounting

12.Hedge accounting

Derivatives are used to hedge interest rate, exchange rate, commodity, and equity exposures and exposures to certain indices such as house price indices and retail price indices related to non-trading positions.

Where derivatives are held for risk management purposes, and when transactions meet the required criteria, specified in IAS 39, the Group applies fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting, or hedging of a net investment in a foreign operation as appropriate to the risks being hedged.

When a financial instrument is designated as a hedge, the Group formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item as well as its risk management objectives and its strategy for undertaking the various hedging transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.

The Group discontinues hedge accounting when:

 

(i)a)It is determined that a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective as a hedge;

 

(ii)b)the derivative expires, or is sold, terminated, or exercised;

 

(iii)c)the hedged item matures or is sold or repaid; or

 

(iv)d)a forecast transaction is no longer deemed highly probable.

In certain circumstances, the Group may decide to cease hedge accounting even though the hedge relationship continues to be highly effective by no longer designating the financial instrument as a hedging instrument. To the extent that the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged risk in the hedged item; or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging derivative differs from the cumulative change in the fair value of expected future cash flows of the hedged item, the hedge is deemed to include ineffectiveness. The amount of ineffectiveness, provided it is not so great as to disqualify the entire hedge for hedge accounting, is recorded in the income statement.

Fair value hedge accounting

Changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify and are designated as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.

If the hedge relationship no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, it is discontinued. For fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the fair value adjustment to the hedged item is amortised to the income statement over the period to maturity of the previously designated hedge relationship using the effective interest method.

If the hedged item is sold or repaid, the unamortised fair value adjustment is recognised immediately in the income statement.

Cash flow hedges

For qualifying cash flow hedges, the fair value gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognised initially in shareholders’ equity, and recycled to the income statement in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in the income statement immediately.

When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the hedged item is ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement.

Hedges of net investments

Hedges of net investments in foreign operations, including monetary items that are accounted for as part of the net investment, are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges; the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised directly in equity and the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. The cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is recognised in the income statement on the disposal or partial disposal of the foreign operation.

Hedges of net investments may include non-derivative liabilities as well as derivative financial instruments although for a non-derivative liability only the foreign exchange risk is designated as a hedge.

Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting

Derivative contracts entered into as economic hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting are held at fair value through profit or loss.

13. Property, plant and equipment

13.Property, plant and equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and provisions for impairment, if any. Additions and subsequent expenditures are capitalised only to the extent that they enhance the future economic benefits expected to be derived from the assets.

Depreciation is provided on the depreciable amount of items of property and equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives. The depreciable amount is the gross carrying amount, less the estimated residual value at the end of its useful economic life.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 153
 183


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Accounting policies

 

The Group uses the following annual rates in calculating depreciation:

 

Freehold buildings and long-leasehold property (more

(more than 50 years to run)

 2-3.3%

Leasehold property

(less than 50 years to run)

 

Over the remaining

life of the lease

Costs of adaptation of freehold and

leasehold propertya

 7-10%

Equipment installed in freehold and

leasehold propertya

 7-10%

Computers and similar equipment

 20-33%

Fixtures and fittings and other equipment

 10-20%

Depreciation rates, methods and the residual values underlying the calculation of depreciation of items of property, plant and equipment are kept under review to take account of any change in circumstances.

When deciding on depreciation rates and methods, the principal factors the Group takes into account are the expected rate of technological developments and expected market requirements for, and the expected pattern of usage of, the assets. When reviewing residual values, the Group estimates the amount that it would currently obtain for the disposal of the asset after deducting the estimated cost of disposal if the asset were already of the age and condition expected at the end of its useful economic life.

No depreciation is provided on freehold land, although, in common with all long-lived assets, it is subject to impairment testing, if deemed appropriate.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised in the income statement.

14. Intangible assets

Goodwill

Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiary and associated entities and joint ventures, and represents the excess of the fair value of the purchase consideration and direct costs of making the acquisition, over the fair value of the Group’s share of the assets acquired, and the liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed on the date of the acquisition.

For the purpose of calculating goodwill, fair values of acquired assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are determined by reference to market values or by discounting expected future cash flows to present value. This discounting is either performed using market rates or by using risk-free rates and risk-adjusted expected future cash flows. Goodwill is capitalised and reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently when there are indications that impairment may have occurred. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. Goodwill on acquisitions of associates and joint ventures is included in the amount of the investment. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of the goodwill relating to the entity sold.

The carrying amount of goodwill in the UK GAAP balance sheet as at 31st December 2003 has been brought forward without adjustment on transition to IFRSs.

Computer software

Computer software is stated at cost, less amortisation and provisions for impairment, if any.

The identifiable and directly associated external and internal costs of acquiring and developing software are capitalised where the software is controlled by the Group, and where it is probable that future economic benefits that exceed its cost will flow from its use over more than one year. Costs associated with maintaining software are recognised as an expense when incurred.

Capitalised computer software is amortised over three to five years.

Note

aWhere leasehold property has a remaining useful life of less than 15 years, costs of adaptation and installed equipment are depreciated over the remaining life of the lease.

 

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets consist of brands, customer lists, licences and other contracts, core deposit intangibles, mortgage servicing rights and customer relationships. Other intangible assets are initially recognised when they are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights, the cost can be measured reliably and, in the case of intangible assets not acquired in a business combination, where it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the assets will flow from their use. The value of intangible assets which are acquired in a business combination is generally determined using income approach methodologies such as the discounted cash flow method and the relief from royalty method that estimate net cash flows attributable to an asset over its economic life and discount to present value using an appropriate rate of return based on the cost of equity adjusted for risk.

Other intangible assets are stated at cost less amortisation and provisions for impairment, if any, and are amortised over their useful lives in a manner that reflects the pattern to which they contribute to future cash flows, generally over 4-25 years.

15. Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

At each balance sheet date, or more frequently where events or changes in circumstances dictate, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are assessed for indications of impairment. If indications are present, these assets are subject to an impairment review. Goodwill is subject to an impairment review as at the balance sheet date each year. The impairment review comprises a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset with its recoverable amount: the higher of the asset’s or the cash-generating unit’s net selling price and its value in use. Net selling price is calculated by reference to the amount at which the asset could be disposed of in a binding sale agreement in an arms-lengtharm’s length transaction evidenced by an active market or recent transactions for similar assets. Value in use is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows obtainable as a result of the asset’s continued use, including those resulting from its ultimate disposal, at a market-based discount rate on a pre-tax basis.

The carrying values of fixed assets and goodwill are written down by the amount of any impairment and this loss is recognised in the income statement in the period in which it occurs. A previously recognised impairment loss relating to a fixed asset may be reversed in part or in full when a change in circumstances leads to a change in the estimates used to determine the fixed asset’s recoverable amount. The carrying amount of the fixed asset will only be increased up to the amount that it would have been had the original impairment not been recognised. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. For the purpose of conducting impairment reviews, cash-generating units are the lowest level at which management monitors the return on investment on assets.

16. Financial guarantees

Financial guarantee contracts are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payments when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument.

Financial guarantees are initially recognised in the financial statements at fair value on the date that the guarantee was given. Other than where the fair value option is applied, subsequent to initial recognition, the bank’s liabilities under such guarantees are measured at the higher of the initial measurement, less amortisation calculated to recognise in the income statement any fee income earned over the period, and the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle any financial obligation arising as a result of the guarantees at the balance sheet date, in accordance with policy 23.

Any increase in the liability relating to guarantees is taken to the income statement in Provisions for undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided. Any liability remaining is recognised in the income statement when the guarantee is discharged, cancelled or expires.


 

154Note

a      Where leasehold property has a remaining useful life of less than 15 years, costs of adaptation and installed equipment are depreciated over the remaining life of the lease.

184 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

 

17.Issued debt and equity securities

17. Issued debt and equity securities

Issued financial instruments or their components are classified as liabilities where the contractual arrangement results in the Group having a present obligation to either deliver cash or another financial asset to the holder, to exchange financial instruments on terms that are potentially unfavourable or to satisfy the obligation otherwise than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of equity shares. Issued financial instruments, or their components, are classified as equity where they meet the definition of equity and confer on the holder a residual interest in the assets of the Company. The components of issued financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are accounted for separately with the equity component being assigned the residual amount after deducting from the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined as the fair value of the liability component.

Financial liabilities, other than trading liabilities and financial liabilities designated at fair value, are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method as set out in policy 6. Derivatives embedded in financial liabilities that are not designated at fair value are accounted for as set out in policy 7. Equity instruments, including share capital, are initially recognised at net proceeds, after deducting transaction costs and any related income tax. Dividend and other payments to equity holders are deducted from equity, net of any related tax.

18. Share capital

18.Share capital

Share issue costs

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options including those issued on the acquisition of a business are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

Dividends on ordinary shares

Dividends on ordinary shares are recognised in equity in the period in which they are paid or, if earlier, approved by the Barclays PLC (the Company) shareholders.

Treasury shares

Where the Company or any member of the Group purchases the Company’s share capital, the consideration paid is deducted from shareholders’ equity as treasury shares until they are cancelled. Where such shares are subsequently sold or reissued, any consideration received is included in shareholders’ equity.

19. Insurance contracts and investment contracts

19.Insurance contracts and investment contracts

The Group offers wealth management, term assurance, annuity, property and payment protection insurance products to customers that take the form of long- and short-term insurance contracts.

The Group classifies its wealth management and other products as insurance contracts where these transfer significant insurance risk, generally where the benefits payable on the occurrence of an insured event are at least 5% more than the benefits that would be payable if the insured event does not occur.

Contracts that do not contain significant insurance risk or discretionary participation features are classified as investment contracts. Financial assets and liabilities relating to investment contracts, and assets backing insurance contracts are classified and measured as appropriate under IAS 39, ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’.

 

Long-term Insuranceinsurance contracts

These contracts, insure events associated with human life (for example, death or survival) over a long duration. Premiums are recognised as revenue when they become payable by the contract holder. Claims and surrenders are accounted for when notified. Maturities on the policy maturity date and regular withdrawals are accounted for when due.

A liability for contractual benefits that are expected to be incurred in the future is recorded when the premiums are recognised, based on the expected discounted value of the benefit payments and directly related administration costs, less the expected discounted value of the future premiums that would be required to meet the benefits and other expenses. The calculation of the liability contains assumptions regarding mortality, maintenance expenses and investment income.

Liabilities under unit-linked life insurance contracts (such as endowment policies) in addition reflect the value of assets held within unitised investment pools.

Short-term insurance contracts

Under its payment protection insurance products the Group is committed to paying benefits to the policyholder rather than forgiving interest or principal on the occurrence of an insured event, such as unemployment, sickness, or injury. Property insurance contracts mainly compensate the policyholders for damage to their property or for the value of property lost.

Premiums are recognised as revenue proportionally over the period of the coverage. Claims and claims handling costs are charged to income as incurred, based on the estimated liability for compensation owed to policyholders arising from events that have occurred up to the balance sheet date even if they have not yet been reported to the Group, based on assessments of individual cases reported to the Group and statistical analyses for the claims incurred but not reported.

Deferred acquisition costs (DAC)

Commissions and other costs that are related to securing new insurance and investment contracts are capitalised and amortised over the estimated lives of the relevant contracts.

Deferred income liability

Fees that are designed to recover commissions and other costs related to either securing new insurance and investment contracts or renewing existing investment contracts are included as a liability and amortised over the estimated life of the contract.

Value of business acquired

On acquisition of a portfolio of contracts, such as through the acquisition of a subsidiary, the Group recognises an intangible asset representing the value of business acquired (VOBA), representing the future profits embedded in acquired insurance contracts and investment contracts with a discretionary participation feature. The asset is amortised over the remaining terms of the acquired contracts.

Liability adequacy test

Liability adequacy tests are performed at each balance sheet date to ensure the adequacy of contract liabilities net of DAC and VOBA assets. Current best estimates of future contractual cash flows, claims handling and administration costs, and investment returns from the assets backing the liabilities are taken into account in the tests. Where a deficiency is highlighted by the test, DAC and VOBA assets are written off first, and insurance liabilities increased when these are written off in full. Any deficiency is immediately recognised in the income statement.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 155
 185


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Accounting policies

 

Reinsurance

Short- and long-term insurance business is ceded to reinsurers under contracts to transfer part or all of one or more of the following risks: mortality, investment and expenses. All such contracts are dealt with as insurance contracts. The benefits to which the Group is entitled under its reinsurance contracts are recognised as reinsurance assets. The Group assesses reinsurance assets at each balance sheet date. If there is objective evidence of impairment, the carrying amount of the reinsurance asset is reduced accordingly resulting in a charge to the income statement.

20. Leases

Lessor

Assets leased to customers under agreements, which transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, with or without ultimate legal title, are classified as finance leases. When assets are held subject to a finance lease, the present value of the lease payments, discounted at the rate of interest implicit in the lease, is recognised as a receivable. The difference between the total payments receivable under the lease and the present value of the receivable is recognised as unearned finance income, which is allocated to accounting periods under the pre-tax net investment method to reflect a constant periodic rate of return.

Assets leased to customers under agreements which do not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. The leased assets are included within property, plant and equipment on the Group’s balance sheet and depreciation is provided on the depreciable amount of these assets on a systematic basis over their estimated useful lives. Lease income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease unless another systematic basis is more appropriate.

Lessee

The leases entered into by the Group are primarily operating leases. Operating lease rentals payable are recognised as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term unless another systematic basis is more appropriate.

21. Employee benefits

The Group provides employees worldwide with post-retirement benefits mainly in the form of pensions. The Group operates a number of pension schemes which may be funded or unfunded and of a defined contribution or defined benefit nature. In addition, the Group contributes, according to local law in the various countries in which it operates, to Governmental and other plans which have the characteristics of defined contribution plans.

For defined benefit schemes, actuarial valuation of each of the scheme’s obligations using the projected unit credit method and the fair valuation of each of the scheme’s assets are performed annually, using the assumptions set out in Note 30. The difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, adjusted for any historic unrecognised actuarial gains or losses and past service cost, is recognised as a liability in the balance sheet. An asset, arising for example, as a result of past over funding or the performance of the plan investments, is recognised to the extent that it does not exceed the present value of future contribution holidays or refunds of contributions.

Cumulative actuarial gains and losses in excess of the greater of 10% of the assets or 10% of the obligations of the plan are recognised in the income statement over the remaining average service lives of the employees of the related plan, on a straight-line basis.

For defined contribution schemes, the Group recognises contributions due in respect of the accounting period in the income statement. Any contributions unpaid at the balance sheet date are included as a liability.

 

The Group also provides health care to certain retired employees, which are accrued as a liability in the financial statements over the period of employment, using a methodology similar to that for defined benefit pensions plans.

Short-term employee benefits, such as salaries, paid absences, and other benefits, are accounted for on an accruals basis over the period which employees have provided services in the year. Bonuses are recognised to the extent that the Group has a present obligation to its employees that can be measured reliably.

All expenses related to employee benefits are recognised in the income statement in staff costs, which is included within operating expenses.

22. Share-based payments to employees

The Group engages in equity settled share-based payment transactions in respect of services received from certain of its employees. The fair value of the services received is measured by reference to the fair value of the shares or share options granted on the date of the grant. The cost of the employee services received in respect of the shares or share options granted is recognised in the income statement over the period that the services are received, which is the vesting period. The fair value of the options granted is determined using option pricing models, which take into account the exercise price of the option, the current share price, the risk free interest rate, the expected volatility of the share price over the life of the option and other relevant factors. Except for those which include terms related to market conditions, vesting conditions included in the terms of the grant are not taken into account in estimating fair value. Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of shares or share options included in the measurement of the cost of employee services so that ultimately, the amount recognised in the income statement reflects the number of vested shares or share options. Where vesting conditions are related to market conditions, the charges for the services received are recognised regardless of whether or not the market related vesting condition is met, provided that the non-market vesting conditions are met.

23. Provisions

Provisions are recognised for present obligations arising as consequences of past events where it is more likely than not that a transfer of economic benefit will be necessary to settle the obligation, and it can be reliably estimated.

When a leasehold property ceases to be used in the business or a demonstrable commitment has been made to cease to use a property where the costs exceed the benefits of the property, provision is made, where the unavoidable costs of the future obligations relating to the lease are expected to exceed anticipated rental income and other benefits. The net costs are discounted using market rates of interest to reflect the long-term nature of the cash flows.

Provision is made for the anticipated cost of restructuring, including redundancy costs when an obligation exists. An obligation exists when the Group has a detailed formal plan for restructuring a business and has raised valid expectations in those affected by the restructuring by starting to implement the plan or announcing its main features. The provision raised is normally utilised within nine months.

Provision is made for undrawn loan commitments and similar facilities if it is probable that the facility will be drawn and result in the recognition of an asset at an amount less than the amount advanced.

Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events or present obligations where the transfer of economic benefit is uncertain or cannot be reliably measured. Contingent liabilities are not recognised but are disclosed unless they are remote.


 

156186 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGOLOGO

 

24. Taxes, including deferred taxes

Income tax payable on taxable profits (‘current tax’), is recognised as an expense in the period in which the profits arise. Income tax recoverable on tax allowable losses is recognised as an asset only to the extent that it is regarded as recoverable by offset against current or future taxable profits.

Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising from the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates and legislation enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and is expected to apply when the deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled. Deferred and current tax assets and liabilities are only offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and where there is both the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

25. Segment reporting

BusinessOperating segments are distinguishable componentsreported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee, which is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the Group that provide products or services that are subject to risks and rewards that are different to those of otheroperating segments, has been identified as the chief operating decision maker.

All transactions between business segments. Geographical segments provide products or services within a particular economic environment that is subject to risks and rewards that are different to those of components operating in other economic environments. Business segments are the primary reporting segments. Group costs are allocated to segmentsconducted on a reasonable and consistent basis. Transactions between segments are generally accounted for in accordance with Group policies as if the segment were a stand-alone businessan arm’s length basis, with intra-segment revenue and costs being eliminated in Head office.

The analyses by geographical Income and expenses directly associated with each segment are based on the location of the customer.included in determining business segment performance.

26. Cash and cash equivalents

For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits, and cash equivalents comprise highly liquid investments that are convertible into cash with an insignificant risk of changes in value with original maturities of less than three months. Repos

Repurchase and reverse reposrepurchase agreements are not considered to be part of cash equivalents.

27. Trust activities

The Group commonly acts as trustees and in other fiduciary capacities that result in the holding or placing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts, retirement benefit plans and other institutions. These assets and income arising thereon are excluded from these financial statements, as they are not assets of the Group.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 157
 187


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Accounting presentationdevelopments

Changes in accounting policy

The adoption of IFRSs and IFRICs in 2008 has resulted in no significant changes to the accounting policies except:

a)IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ has been adopted as at 1st January 2008. IFRS 8 was issued in November 2006 and excluding early adoption would first be required to be applied to the Group’s accounting period beginning on 1st January 2009. The standard replaces IAS 14 ‘Segmental Reporting’ and aligns operating segmental reporting with segments reported to senior management as well as requiring amendments and additions to the existing segmental reporting disclosures as set out in Note 53. The standard does not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of specific transactions in the consolidated financial statements.

b)Certain financial assets originally classified as held for trading have been reclassified to loans and receivables on 16th December 2008 as set out in Note 51 on page 278. Following the amendment to IAS 39 in October 2008, a non-derivative financial asset held for trading may be transferred out of the fair value through profit or loss category after 1st July 2008 where:

In rare circumstances, it is no longer held for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term; or

It is no longer held for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term, it would have met the definition of a loan and receivable on initial classification and the Group has the intention and ability to hold it for the foreseeable future or until maturity.

Future Accounting Developmentsaccounting developments

Consideration will be given during 20082009 to the implications, if any, of the following new and revised standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations, as follows:

 

 

IFRS 3 – Business Combinations and IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements are revised standards issued in January 2008. The revised IFRS 3 applies prospectively to business combinations first accounted for in accounting periods beginning on or after 1st July 2009 and the amendments to IAS 27 apply retrospectively to periods beginning on or after 1st July 2009. The main changes in existing practice resulting from the revision to IFRS 3 affect acquisitions that are achieved in stages and acquisitions where less than 100% of the equity is acquired. In addition, acquisition related costs – such as fees paid to advisers – must be accounted for separately from the business combination, which means that they will be recognised as expenses unless they are directly connected with the issue of debt or equity securities. The revisions to IAS 27 specify that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in the loss of control must be accounted for as equity transactions. Until future acquisitions take place that are accounted for in accordance with the revised IFRS 3, the main impact on Barclays will be that, from 2010, gains and losses on transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control will no longer be recognised in the income statement but directly in equity. In 2007,2008, gains of £23m£8m and losses of £6m£2m were recognised in income relating to such transactions.

 

IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programs addresses accounting by entities that grant loyalty award credits (such as ‘points’ or travel miles) to customers who buy other goods or services. It requires entities to allocate some of the proceeds of the initial sale to the award credits and recognise these proceeds as revenue only when they have fulfilled their obligations. The Group is considering the implications of this interpretation and any resulting change in accounting policy would be accounted for in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors in 2009.

IFRS 8 – Operating Segments was issued in November 2006 and would first be required to be applied to the Group accounting period beginning on 1st January 2009. The standard replaces IAS 14 –Segmental Reporting and would align operating segmental reporting with segments reported to senior management as well as requiring amendments and additions to the existing segmental reporting disclosures. The standard does not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of specific transactions in the consolidated financial statements. The Group is considering the enhancements that permitted early adoption in 2008 may make to the transparency of the segmental disclosures.

 

IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements is a revised standard applicable to annual periods beginning on 1st January 2009. The amendments affect the presentation of owner changes in equity and of comprehensive income. They do not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of specific transactions and events required by other standards.

IAS 23 – Borrowing Costs is a revised standard applicable to annual periods beginning on 1st January 2009. The revision does not impact Barclays. The revision removes the option not to capitalise borrowing costs on qualifying assets, which are assets that take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale.

 

 

An amendment to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment was issued in January 2008 that clarifies that vesting conditions are service conditions and performance conditions only. It also specifies that all cancellations, whether by the entity or by other parties, should receive the same accounting treatment, which results in the acceleration of charge. The Group is considering the implications of the amendment, particularly to the Sharesave scheme, and any resulting change in accounting policy would be accounted for in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors in 2009.

 

 

Amendments to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards and IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements – Cost of an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly Controlled Entity or Associate were issued in May 2008. The amendment to IFRS 1 has no impact on Barclays. The amendment to IAS 27 results in dividends received from subsidiaries being treated as income in the individual financial statements of the parent, whether paid from pre or post acquisition profits, and could affect the cost of investment in subsidiaries in certain group reconstructions. The amendments, which first apply to annual periods beginning on or after 1st January 2009, are not expected to affect group accounting policies.

IAS 23 – Borrowing Costs is a revised standard applicable to annual periods beginning on 1st January 2009. The revision does not impact Barclays. The revision removes the option to not capitalise borrowing costs on qualifying assets, which are assets that take a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended use or sale.

Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements were issued in February 2008 that require some puttable financial instruments and some financial instruments that impose on the entity anand obligation to deliver to another party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation to be classified as equity. The amendments, which are applicable to annual periods beginning on 1st January 2009, doare not expected to have a material impact on Barclays.

Eligible Hedged Items (an amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) was issued in July 2008 and applies retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after 1st July 2009. The amendment provides additional guidance where hedge accounting is to be obtained for a one sided risk in a hedged item or for inflation in a financial hedged item. No changes to accounting policies are expected as a result of the amendment.

‘Improvements to IFRS’ was issued in May 2008 and contains numerous amendments to IFRS which the IASB consider non-urgent but necessary. No changes to accounting policies are expected as a result of these amendments.


188

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

The following IFRIC interpretations issued during 2006 and 2007 or 2008 which first apply to accounting periods beginning on or after 1st January 20082009 are not expected to result in any changes to the Group’s accounting policies:

– IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programs;

IFRIC 11 IFRS 2 – Group and Treasury Share Transactions;

– IFRIC 15 – Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate;

– IFRIC 16 – Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation; and

– IFRIC 17 – Distribution of Non-cash assets to owners.

– IFRIC 18 – Transfer of Assets from Customers, was issued in January 2009 and applies prospectively to transfers of assets from customers received on or after 1st July 2009. This interpretation is not expected to result in any changes to the Group’s accounting policies.

IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements;

IFRIC 14 IAS 19 – The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction.

Acquisitions

2007:2008

On 31st March 2008, Barclays completed the acquisition of Discover Financial Services’ UK credit card business, Goldfish. Discover Financial Services is a leading credit card issuer and electronic payment services company.

On 1st July 2008, Barclays acquired 100% of the ordinary shares of Expobank. Expobank is based in Moscow and its main products and services are issuance and servicing of debit and credit cards, mortgages and loans, currency transactions, internet-banking; retail discount cards and other services.

On 22nd September 2008, Barclays completed the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses. The Lehman Brothers North American businesses include Lehman Brothers North American fixed income and equities sales, trading and research and investment banking businesses, Lehman Brothers New York Head Office at 745 Seventh Avenue and two data centres in New Jersey.

On 6th November 2008, Barclays purchased the Italian residential mortgage business of Macquarie Bank Limited. The acquired business includes a mortgage portfolio with a total outstanding balance of approximately1.1 billion, as well as Macquarie’s operational support functions, including staff.

2007

On 8th February 2007, Barclays completed the acquisition of Indexchange Investment AG. Indexchange is based in Munich and offers exchange traded fund products.

On 28th February 2007, Barclays completed the acquisition of Nile Bank Limited. Nile Bank is based in Uganda with 18 branches and 228 employees.


158

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


LOGO

On 30th March 2007, Barclays completed the acquisition of EquiFirst.

EquiFirst is a non-prime wholesale mortgage originator in the United States.

On 18th May 2007, Barclays completed the acquisition of Walbrook Group Limited. Walbrook is based in Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man and Hong Kong where it serves high net worth private clients and corporate customers.

2006:2006

On 1st November 2006, Barclays Bank PLC acquired the US mortgage servicing business of HomEq Servicing Corporation from Wachovia Corporation.

2005: On 1st June 2005, Barclays Asset and Sales Finance (BASF) acquired a 51% share and controlling stake in Fiat’s Iveco Vehicle Finance Business. The transaction will expand BASF’s commercial vehicle expertise.

On 30th June 2005, EnterCard, the joint venture between Barclays Bank PLC and FöreningsSparbanken (also known as Swedbank), which was announced on 4th February 2005, began operations. Barclays Bank PLC has a 50% economic interest in the joint venture. EnterCard provides credit cards in the Nordic market, initially in Sweden and Norway.

On 1st July 2005, Barclays acquired the wealth business of ING Securities Bank (France) consisting of ING Ferri and ING Private Banking.

On 9th May 2005, Barclays announced the terms of a recommended acquisition of a majority stake in Absa Group Limited (‘Absa’). Barclays consolidated Absa from 27th July 2005.

Disposals

2007:2008

On 31st October 2008 Barclays completed the sale of Barclays Life Assurance Company Ltd to Swiss Reinsurance Company.

2007

On 4th April 2007, Barclays completed the sale of part of Monument, a credit card business.

On 24th September 2007, Barclays completed the sale of a 50% shareholding in Intelenet Global Services Pvt Ltd.

2006:2006

On 1st January 2006, Barclays completed the sale of the Barclays South African branch business to Absa Group Limited. This consists of the Barclays Capital South African operations and Corporate and Business Banking activities previously carried out by the South African branch of InternationalGlobal Retail and Commercial Banking, – excluding Absa, together with the associated assets and liabilities.

On 25th July 2006, Barclays Asset & Sales Finance (BASF) disposed of its interest in its motor vehicle contract hire business, Appleyard Finance Holdings Limited.

On 31st August 2006, Barclays disposed of Bankhaus Wolbern which was formerly part of Absa.

On 22nd December 2006 Barclays disposed of its interest in FirstCaribbean International Bank to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

On 31st December 2006, BA&SF disposed of its European Vendor Finance business, including Barclays Industrie Bank GmbH and Barclays Technology Finance Ltd, to CIT Group.

Recent developments

On 16th April 2007,2nd February 2009, Barclays completed the acquisition of PT Bank Akita, which was announced initially on 17th September 2008, following the saleapproval of Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust & Banking Co., Ltd, a Japanese trust administration and custody operation. The sale completed on 31st January 2008.the Central Bank of Indonesia.

On 5th October 2007,17th February 2009, Barclays announced that asBarclays Capital will discontinue operations at 4th October 2007 not allits Equifirst subsidiary due to the market environment and strategic direction of the conditions relating to its offer for ABN AMRO Holding N.V. were fulfilled and as a result Barclays was withdrawing its offer with immediate effect. Barclays also announced that it was restarting the Barclays PLC share buy-back programme to minimise the dilutive effect of the issuance of shares to China Development Bank and Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited on existing Barclays PLC shareholders. This programme was intended to run until 31st December 2007, but was subsequently extended to 31st January 2008.

On 7th February 2008, Barclays announced the purchase of Discover’s UK credit card business for a consideration of approximately £35m. The consideration is subject to an adjustment mechanism based on the net asset value of the business at completion. Completion is subject to various conditions, including competition clearance, and is expected to occur during the first half of 2008.

On 3rd March 2008, Barclays entered into an agreement with Petropavlousk Finance (limited liability society) to acquire 100% of the Russian Bank, Expobank, for a consideration of approximately $745m (£373m). The transaction is expected to close in summer 2008 after receipt of appropriate regulatory approvals. Expobank focuses principally on Western Russia, with a substantial presence in Moscow and St Petersburg. Founded in 1994 it has grown rapidly and comprises a blend of retail and commercial banking, operating 32 branches and dealing with a range of corporate and wholesale clients. As at 31st December 2007, Expobank had net assets of $186m (£93m).Group.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 159
 189


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Consolidated income statement

Consolidated income statement

For the year ended 31st December

 

  Notes  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
  Notes  2008
£m
 

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 

Continuing operations

            

Interest income

  2  25,308  21,805  17,232   2  28,010  25,308  21,805 

Interest expense

  2  (15,698) (12,662) (9,157)  2  (16,541) (15,698) (12,662)

Net interest income

     9,610  9,143  8,075      11,469  9,610  9,143 

Fee and commission income

  3  8,678  8,005  6,430   3  9,489  8,678  8,005 

Fee and commission expense

  3  (970) (828) (725)  3  (1,082) (970) (828)

Net fee and commission income

     7,708  7,177  5,705      8,407  7,708  7,177 

Net trading income

  4  3,759  3,614  2,321   4  1,329  3,759  3,614 

Net investment income

  4  1,216  962  858   4  680  1,216  962 

Principal transactions

     4,975  4,576  3,179      2,009  4,975  4,576 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  5  1,011  1,060  872   5  1,090  1,011  1,060 

Other income

  6  188  214  147   6  377  188  214 

Total income

    23,492  22,170  17,978     23,352  23,492  22,170 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  5  (492) (575) (645)  5  (237) (492) (575)

Total income net of insurance claims

    23,000  21,595  17,333     23,115  23,000  21,595 

Impairment charges and other credit risk provisions

  7  (2,795) (2,154) (1,571)

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

  7  (5,419) (2,795) (2,154)

Net income

     20,205  19,441  15,762      17,696  20,205  19,441 

Staff costs

  8  (8,405) (8,169) (6,318)  8  (7,779) (8,405) (8,169)

Administration and general expenses

  9  (4,141) (3,914) (3,768)  9  (5,666) (4,141) (3,914)

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

  23  (467) (455) (362)  23  (630) (467) (455)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  22  (186) (136) (79)  22  (291) (186) (136)

Operating expenses

     (13,199) (12,674) (10,527)     (14,366) (13,199) (12,674)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  20  42  46  45   20  14  42  46 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

    28  323  –     38  327  28  323 

Gains on acquisitions

  39  2,406     

Profit before tax

     7,076  7,136  5,280     6,077  7,076  7,136 

Tax

  10  (1,981) (1,941) (1,439)  10  (790) (1,981) (1,941)

Profit after tax

     5,095  5,195  3,841      5,287  5,095  5,195 

Profit attributable to minority interests

  33  678  624  394   33  905  678  624 

Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent

    4,417  4,571  3,447      4,382  4,417  4,571 
     5,095  5,195  3,841      5,287  5,095  5,195 
     p  p  p      p  p  p 

Earnings per share

            

Basic earnings per share

  11  68.9  71.9  54.4   11  59.3  68.9  71.9 

Diluted earnings per share

  11  66.7  69.8  52.6   11  57.5  66.7  69.8 

Interim dividend per ordinary share

    11.50  10.50  9.20     11.5  11.50  10.50 

Proposed final dividend per ordinary share

  1  22.50  20.50  17.40   1    22.50  20.50 
     £m  £m  £m      £m  £m  £m 

Interim dividend paid

    768  666  582     906  768  666 

Proposed final dividend

  1  1,485  1,307  1,105   1    1,485  1,307 

The Board of Directors approved the accounts set out on pages 149179 to 249284 on 7th5th March 2008.2009.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the Consolidated accounts.

 

190

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

160


LOGO

LOGO

Consolidated Accounts Barclays PLC

Consolidated balance sheet

Consolidated balance sheet

As at 31st December

 

  Notes  

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 
  Notes  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Assets

          

Cash and balances at central banks

    5,801  7,345     30,019  5,801 

Items in the course of collection from other banks

    1,836  2,408     1,695  1,836 

Trading portfolio assets

  12  193,691  177,867   12  185,637  193,691 

Financial assets designated at fair value:

          

– held on own account

  13  56,629  31,799   13  54,542  56,629 

– held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  13  90,851  82,798   13  66,657  90,851 

Derivative financial instruments

  14  248,088  138,353   14  984,802  248,088 

Loans and advances to banks

  15  40,120  30,926   15  47,707  40,120 

Loans and advances to customers

  15  345,398  282,300   15  461,815  345,398 

Available for sale financial investments

  16  43,072  51,703   16  64,976  43,072 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  17  183,075  174,090   17  130,354  183,075 

Other assets

  18  5,150  5,850   18  6,302  5,150 

Current tax assets

  19  518  557     389  518 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

  20  377  228   20  341  377 

Goodwill

  21  7,014  6,092   21  7,625  7,014 

Intangible assets

  22  1,282  1,215   22  2,777  1,282 

Property, plant and equipment

  23  2,996  2,492   23  4,674  2,996 

Deferred tax assets

  19  1,463  764   19  2,668  1,463 

Total assets

     1,227,361  996,787      2,052,980  1,227,361 

Liabilities

          

Deposits from banks

    90,546  79,562     114,910  90,546 

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

    1,792  2,221     1,635  1,792 

Customer accounts

    294,987  256,754     335,505  294,987 

Trading portfolio liabilities

  12  65,402  71,874   12  59,474  65,402 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  24  74,489  53,987   24  76,892  74,489 

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  13  92,639  84,637   13  69,183  92,639 

Derivative financial instruments

  14  248,288  140,697   14  968,072  248,288 

Debt securities in issue

    120,228  111,137     149,567  120,228 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  17  169,429  136,956   17  182,285  169,429 

Other liabilities

  25  10,499  10,337   25  12,640  10,499 

Current tax liabilities

  19  1,311  1,020     1,216  1,311 

Insurance contract liabilities, including unit-linked liabilities

  26  3,903  3,878   26  2,152  3,903 

Subordinated liabilities

  27  18,150  13,786   27  29,842  18,150 

Deferred tax liabilities

  19  855  282   19  304  855 

Provisions

  28  830  462   28  535  830 

Retirement benefit liabilities

  30  1,537  1,807   30  1,357  1,537 

Total liabilities

     1,194,885  969,397      2,005,569  1,194,885 

Shareholders’ equity

          

Called up share capital

  31  1,651  1,634   31  2,093  1,651 

Share premium account

  31  56  5,818   31  4,045  56 

Other equity

  31  3,652   

Other reserves

  32  874  390   32  2,793  874 

Retained earnings

  32  20,970  12,169   32  24,208  20,970 

Less: treasury shares

  32  (260) (212)  32  (173) (260)

Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests

    23,291  19,799     36,618  23,291 

Minority interests

  33  9,185  7,591   33  10,793  9,185 

Total shareholders’ equity

     32,476  27,390      47,411  32,476 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     1,227,361  996,787      2,052,980  1,227,361 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the Consolidated accounts.

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

John Varley

Group Chief Executive

Christopher Lucas

Group Finance Director

 

161 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 191


Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense

For the year ended 31st December

 

   

 

2007
£m

 
 

 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 

Available for sale reserve:

    

– Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

  484  87  (249)

– Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

  13  86  –   

– Net gains transferred to net profit on disposal

  (563) (327) (120)

– Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  68  14  260 

Cash flow hedging reserve:

    

– Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

  106  (437) (50)

– Net losses/(gains) transferred to net profit

  253  (50) (69)

Currency translation differences

  54  (781) 300 

Tax

  54  253  50 

Other

  22  25  (102)

 

Amounts included directly in equity

  491  (1,130) 20 

Profit after tax

  5,095  5,195  3,841 

 

Total recognised income and expense for the year

  5,586  4,065  3,861 

 

Attributable to:

    

Equity holders of the parent

  4,854  3,682  3,379 

Minority interests

  732  383  482 
   5,586  4, 065  3,861 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the Consolidated accounts.

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

 

Available for sale reserve:

    

– Net (losses)/gains from changes in fair value

  (1,741) 484  87 

– Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

  382  13  86 

– Net gains transferred to net profit on disposal

  (209) (563) (327)

– Net (gains)/losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  (2) 68  14 

Cash flow hedging reserve:

    

– Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

  305  106  (437)

– Net losses/(gains) transferred to net profit

  71  253  (50)

Currency translation differences

  2,407  54  (781)

Tax

  841  54  253 

Other

  (5) 22  25 

Amounts included directly in equity

  2,049  491  (1,130)

Profit after tax

  5,287  5,095  5,195 

Total recognised income and expense for the year

  7,336  5,586  4,065 

Attributable to:

    

Equity holders of the parent

  6,213  4,854  3,682 

Minority interests

  1,123  732  383 
   7,336  5,586  4, 065 

 

192

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

162


LOGO

LOGO

Consolidated accounts Barclays PLC

Consolidated cash flow statement

Consolidated cash flow statement

For the year ended 31st December

 

   2007

£m

 

 

    2006
£m
 
 
    2005

£m

 

 

Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities:

        
Profit before tax  7,076    7,136    5,280 

Adjustment for non-cash items:

        

Allowance for impairment

  2,795    2,154    1,571 

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of property, plant, equipment and intangibles

  669    612    450 

Other provisions, including pensions

  753    558    654 

Net profit from associates and joint ventures

  (42)    (46)   (45)

Net profit on disposal of investments and property, plant and equipment

  (862)    (778)   (530)

Net profit from disposal of associates and joint ventures

  (26)    (263)    

Net profit from disposal of subsidiaries

  (2)    (60)    

Other non-cash movements

  (1,133)    1,702    1,475 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Net increase in loans and advances to banks and customers

  (77,987)    (27,385)   (63,177)

Net increase in deposits and debt securities in issue

  90,589    46,944    67,012 

Net (increase)/decrease in derivative financial instruments

  (2,144)    1,196    841 

Net increase in trading portfolio assets

  (18,227)    (18,323)   (42,589)

Net (decrease)/increase in trading liabilities

  (6,472)    310    9,888 

Net (increase)/decrease in financial investments

  (4,379)    1,538    27,129 

Net (increase)/decrease in other assets

  1,299    (1,527)   (410)

Net decrease in other liabilities

  (1,071)    (1,580)   (2,818)

Tax paid

  (1,583)     (2,141)    (1,082)

 

Net cash (used in)/from operating activities

  (10,747)     10,047     3,649 

Purchase of available for sale investments

  (26,899)    (47,086)   (53,483)

Proceeds from sale or redemption of available for sale investments

  38,423    46,069    51,111 

Purchase of intangible assets

  (263)    (212)   (91)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  (1,241)    (654)   (588)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

  617    786    98 

Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

  (270)    (248)   (2,115)

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

  383    (15)    

Increase in investment in subsidiaries

  (668)    (432)   (160)

Decrease in investment in subsidiaries

  57    44    49 

Acquisition of associates and joint ventures

  (220)    (162)   (176)

Disposal of associates and joint ventures

  145    739    40 

Other cash flows associated with investing activities

      17    23 

 

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities

  10,064     (1,154)    (5,292)

Dividends paid

  (2,559)    (2,215)   (1,894)

Proceeds of borrowings and issuance of debt securities

  4,625    2,493    1,179 

Repayments of borrowings and redemption of debt securities

  (683)    (366)   (464)

Issue of shares and other equity instruments

  2,494    179    135 

Repurchase of shares and other equity instruments

  (1,802)         

Net purchase of treasury shares

  (48)    (31)   (140)

Net issue of shares to minority interests

  1,331    632    2,267 

 

Net cash from financing activities

  3,358     692     1,083 

 

Exchange (loss)/gain on foreign currency cash and cash equivalents

  (550)     562     (237)

 

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  2,125     10,147     (797)

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  30,952     20,805     21,602 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  33,077     30,952     20,805 

 

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

        

Cash and balances at central banks

  5,801    7,345    3,906 

Loans and advances to banks

  40,120     30,926     31,105 

Less: amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (19,377)     (15,892)    (17,987)
  20,743    15,034    13,118 

Available for sale treasury and other eligible bills

  43,072     51,703     53,497 

 

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (41,688)     (50,684)    (53,281)
  1,384    1,019    216 

Trading portfolio assets

  193,691     177,867     155,723 

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (188,556)    (170,329)    (152,183)
  5,135    7,538    3,540 

Other

  14     16     25 
   33,077     30,952     20,805 

In 2005 the opening cash and cash equivalents balance was adjusted to reflect the adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39. The accompanying notes form an integral part of the Consolidated accounts.

    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities:

        

Profit before tax

  6,077    7,076    7,136 

Adjustment for non-cash items:

        

Allowance for impairment

  5,419    2,795    2,154 

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of property, plant, equipment and intangibles

  951    669    612 

Other provisions, including pensions

  804    753    558 

Net profit from associates and joint ventures

  (14)   (42)   (46)

Net profit on disposal of investments and property, plant and equipment

  (371)   (862)   (778)

Net profit from disposal of associates and joint ventures

      (26)   (263)

Net profit from disposal of subsidiaries

  (327)   (2)   (60)

Net gains on acquisitions

  (2,406)        

Other non-cash movements

  796    (1,133)   1,702 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Net increase in loans and advances to banks and customers

  (58,431)   (77,987)   (27,385)

Net increase in deposits and debt securities in issue

  77,743    90,589    46,944 

Net (increase)/decrease in derivative financial instruments

  (17,529)   (2,144)   1,196 

Net decrease/(increase) in trading portfolio assets

  26,919    (18,227)   (18,323)

Net (decrease)/increase in trading liabilities

  (5,928)   (6,472)   310 

Net decrease/(increase) in financial investments

  5,229    (4,379)   1,538 

Net (increase)/decrease in other assets

  (3,008)   1,299    (1,527)

Net decrease in other liabilities

  (477)   (1,071)   (1,580)

Tax paid

  (1,731)    (1,583)    (2,141)

Net cash from operating activities

  33,716     (10,747)    10,047 

Purchase of available for sale financial investments

  (57,756)   (26,899)   (47,086)

Proceeds from sale or redemption of available for sale financial investments

  51,429    38,423    46,069 

Purchase of intangible assets

  (687)   (263)   (212)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  (1,720)   (1,241)   (654)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

  799    617    786 

Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

  (961)   (270)   (248)

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

  238    383    (15)

Increase in investment in subsidiaries

  (157)   (668)   (432)

Decrease in investment in subsidiaries

  19    57    44 

Acquisition of associates and joint ventures

  (96)   (220)   (162)

Disposal of associates and joint ventures

  137    145    739 

Other cash flows associated with investing activities

            17 

Net cash from investing activities

  (8,755)    10,064     (1,154)

Dividends paid

  (3,047)   (2,559)   (2,215)

Proceeds of borrowings and issuance of debt securities

  5,763    4,625    2,493 

Repayments of borrowings and redemption of debt securities

  (1,207)   (683)   (366)

Net issue of shares and other equity instruments

  9,493    2,494    179 

Repurchase of shares and other equity instruments

  (173)   (1,802)    

Net disposal/(purchase) of treasury shares

  87    (48)   (31)

Net issue of shares to minority interests

  1,356     1,331     632 

Net cash from financing activities

  12,272     3,358     692 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

  (5,801)    (550)    562 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  31,432     2,125     10,147 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  33,077     30,952     20,805 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  64,509     33,077     30,952 

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

        

Cash and balances at central banks

  30,019    5,801    7,345 

Loans and advances to banks

  47,707    40,120    30,926 

Less: non-cash amounts and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (15,428)   (19,377)   (15,892)
  32,279    20,743    15,034 

Available for sale treasury and other eligible bills

  64,976    43,072    51,703 

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (62,876)   (41,688)   (50,684)
  2,100    1,384    1,019 

Trading portfolio assets

  185,637    193,691    177,867 

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (185,526)   (188,556)   (170,329)
  111    5,135    7,538 

Other

       14     16 
   64,509     33,077     30,952 

Interest received in 20072008 was £41,017m (2007: £49,441m, (2006: £38,544m, 2005: £32,124m)2006: £38,544m) and interest paid in 20072008 was £38,975m (2007: £37,821m, (2006: £29,372m, 2005: £23,319m)2006: £29,372m).

The Group is required to maintain balances with central banks and other regulatory authorities and these amounted to £1,037m£1,050m at 31st December 2007 (2006: £1,262m)2008 (2007: £1,037m).

 

163 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 193


Accounts of Barclays PLC

Parent company accounts

 

 

Income statement

For the year ended 31st December

  2007
£m
 

 

2006
£m

 2005
£m
 

Income statement

For the year ended 31st December

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Dividends received from subsidiary

  3,287  1,964  2,012   1,173  3,287  1,964 

Interest income

  4  4  4   7  4  4 

Trading loss

  (13)    

Trading gain/(loss)

  18  (13)  

Other income

  15         15   

Management charge from subsidiary

  (4) (4) (4)  (4) (4) (4)

Profit before tax

  3,289  1,964  2,012   1,194  3,289  1,964 

Tax

         (1)    

Profit after tax

  3,289  1,964  2,012   1,193  3,289  1,964 

The Company had no staff during the year (2006:(2007: nil, 2005:2006: nil).

Balance sheet

As at 31st December

  Notes    

 

2007
£m

  2006
£m

Balance sheet

As at 31st December

  Notes  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Assets

            

Non-current assets

            

Investment in subsidiaries

  39    10,391  8,641  40  15,340  10,391

Current assets

            

Cash and balances at central banks

    671  575      671

Other current assets

     20  17

Other assets

     3,851  20

Total assets

     11,082  9,233     19,191  11,082

Liabilities

            

Current liabilities

            

Amounts payable within one year

    1  4    1  1

Shareholders’ equity

            

Called up share capital

  31    1,651  1,634  31  2,093  1,651

Share premium account

  31    56  5,818  31  4,045  56

Other equity

  31  3,652  

Capital redemption reserve

  32    384  309  32  394  384

Retained earnings

  32    8,990  1,468  32  9,006  8,990

Total shareholders’ equity

     11,081  9,229     19,190  11,081

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     11,082  9,233     19,191  11,082

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the accounts.

Marcus Agius

Group Chairman

John Varley

Group Chief Executive

Christopher Lucas

Group Finance Director

 

194

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

164


LOGOLOGO

 

Statement of recognised income and expense

For the year ended 31st December

Statement of recognised income and expense

For the year ended 31st December

 

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Profit after tax

  1,193  3,289  1,964

Total recognised income and expense for the year

  1,193  3,289  1,964

 

  2007
£m
   
 
2006
£m
 
 
  
 
2005
£m
 
 

Profit after tax

  3,289   1,964   2,012 

Total recognised income and expense for the year

  3,289   1,964   2,012 
Cash flow statement 

For the year ended 31st December

 

  2007
£m
   
£
2006
m
 
 
  
£
2005
m
 
 

Cash flow statement

For the year ended 31st December

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities:

         

Profit before tax

  3,289   1,964   2,012   1,194  3,289  1,964 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

         

Net (increase) in other assets

  (3)   (13)  (1)

Net (decrease)/increase in other liabilities

  (3)      1 

Net increase in other assets

  (16) (3) (13)

Net decrease in other liabilities

    (3)  

Net cash from operating activities

  3,283   1,951   2,012   1,178  3,283  1,951 

Capital contribution to subsidiaries

  (1,434)         (4,362) (1,434)  

Purchase of shares in subsidiaries

  (316)   (179)  (135)  (16) (316) (179)

Liquidation of subsidiary

  205     

Net cash used in investing activities

  (1,750)   (179)  (135)  (4,173) (1,750) (179)

Proceeds from issue of shares

  2,494   179   135 

Issue of shares and other equity instruments

  4,911  2,494  179 

Dividends paid

  (2,129)   (1,814)  (1,612)  (2,414) (2,129) (1,814)

Repurchase of ordinary shares

  (1,802)         (173) (1,802)  

Net cash used in financing activities

  (1,437)   (1,635)  (1,477)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  96   137   400 

Net cash from financing activities

  2,324  (1,437) (1,635)

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (671) 96  137 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  575   438   38   671  575  438 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  671   575   438     671  575 

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

         

Cash and balances at central banks

  671   575   438     671  575 

Net cash from operating activities includes:

         

Dividends received

  3,287   1,964   2,012   1,173  3,287  1,964 

Interest received

  4   4   4   7  4  4 

The parent company’s solemain activity is to hold the investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries,subsidiary, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Investment (Netherlands) N.V. and Odysseus Jersey (No. 1) Limited.PLC.

The Company was not exposed at 31st December 20072008 or 20062007 to significant risks arising from the financial instruments it holds; which mainly comprised cash, and balances with central banks.banks, and other assets which had no credit or market risk.

Dividends received are treated as operating income.

Non-cash transactions

During the year Barclays Bank PLC issued £4,050m of Mandatorily Convertible Notes, which mandatorily convert into ordinary shares of Barclays PLC on or before 30th June 2009. Barclays PLC has the right to receive the Notes in the future; the fair value of which has been included in other assets, with a corresponding increase net of issue costs in other equity.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the accounts.

 

165 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 195


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 20072008

1 Dividends per share

As announced on 13th October 2008, the Board of Barclays has concluded that it would not be appropriate to recommend the payment of a final dividend for 2008. The Directors have recommended the final dividends in respect ofdividend for 2007 of 22.5p per ordinary share of 25p each and 10p per staff share of £1 each, amounting to a total of £1,485m which will be paid on 25th April 2008. The financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2007 do not reflect these dividends, which will beis accounted for in shareholders’ equity as an appropriation of retained profits in the year ending 31st December 2008. The financial statements to 31st December 2007 include the 2006 final dividend of £1,307m.

2 Net interest income

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 2005
£m
   2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

 

Cash and balances with central banks

  145  91  9   174  145  91 

Available for sale investments

  2,580  2,811  2,272   2,355  2,580  2,811 

Loans and advances to banks

  1,416  903  690   1,267  1,416  903 

Loans and advances to customers

  19,559  16,290  12,944   23,754  19,559  16,290 

Other

  1,608  1,710  1,317   460  1,608  1,710 

Interest income

  25,308  21,805  17,232   28,010  25,308  21,805 

Deposits from banks

  (2,720) (2,819) (2,056)  (2,189) (2,720) (2,819)

Customer accounts

  (4,110) (3,076) (2,715)  (6,697) (4,110) (3,076)

Debt securities in issue

  (6,651) (5,282) (3,268)  (5,910) (6,651) (5,282)

Subordinated liabilities

  (878) (777) (605)  (1,349) (878) (777)

Other

  (1,339) (708) (513)  (396) (1,339) (708)

Interest expense

  (15,698) (12,662) (9,157)  (16,541) (15,698) (12,662)

Net interest income

  9,610  9,143  8,075   11,469  9,610  9,143 

Interest income includes £135m (2007: £113m, (2006: £98m, 2005: £76m)2006: £98m) accrued on impaired loans.

Other interest income principally includes interest income relating to reverse repurchase agreements. Similarly, other interest expense principally includes interest expense relating to repurchase agreements and hedging activity.

Included in net interest income is hedge ineffectiveness as detailed in Note 14.

3 Net fee and commission income

 

  2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 2005
£m
 

Fee and commission income

        

Brokerage fees

  109  70  64   87  109  70 

Investment management fees

  1,787  1,535  1,250   1,616  1,787  1,535 

Securities lending

  241  185  151   389  241  185 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  6,363  6,031  4,805   7,208  6,363  6,031 

Foreign exchange commissions

  178  184  160   189  178  184 

Fee and commission income

  8,678  8,005  6,430   9,489  8,678  8,005 

Brokerage fees paid

  (970) (828) (725)

Fee and commission expense

  (970) (828) (725)  (1,082) (970) (828)

Net fee and commission income

  7,708  7,177  5,705   8,407  7,708  7,177 

 

196

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

166


LOGO

LOGO

4 Principal transactions

 

  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
  2005
£m
  

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

Rates related business

  4,162  2,848  1,732  4,751  4,162  2,848

Credit related business

  (403) 766  589  (3,422) (403) 766

Net trading income

  3,759  3,614  2,321  1,329  3,759  3,614

Net gain from disposal of available for sale assets

  560  307  120  212  560  307

Dividend income

  26  15  22  196  26  15

Net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value

  293  447  389  33  293  447

Other investment income

  337  193  327  239  337  193

Net investment income

  1,216  962  858  680  1,216  962

Principal transactions

  4,975  4,576  3,179  2,009  4,975  4,576

Net trading income includes the profits and losses arising both on the purchase and sale of trading instruments and from the revaluation to marketfair value, together with the interest income and expenseearned from these instruments and the related funding cost.

Of the total net trading income, a £756m£2,096m net loss (2006: £947m gain, 2005: £498m(2007: £116m loss, 2006: £1,427m gain) was made on the purchase and sale of securities and the revaluation of both securities and derivatives. This included a £1,272m gain (2007: £640m, gain (2006: £480m, 2005: £340m)2006: £480m) that was earned in foreign exchange dealings.

The net gainloss on financial assets designated at fair value included within principal transactions was £6,602m (2007: £78m (2006:gain, 2006: £489m 2005: £391m)gain) of which losses of £6,635m (2007: £215m (2006:loss, 2006: £42m gain, 2005: £2m gain) were included in net trading income and gains of £33m (2007: £293m, (2006: £447m, 2005: £389m)2006: £447m) were included in net investment income.

The net lossgain on financial liabilities designated at fair value included within principal transactions was £3,328m (2007: £231m (2006:loss, 2006: £920m 2005: £666m)loss) all of which was included within net trading income.

TheNet trading income includes the net gain from widening of credit spreads relating to Barclays Capital issued structured notes held at fair value was £1,663m (2007: £658m, (2006: £nil, 2005:2006: £nil).

5 Insurance premiums and insurance claims and benefits

 

  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Gross premiums from insurance contracts

  1,062  1,108  909   1,138  1,062  1,108 

Premiums ceded to reinsurers

  (51) (48) (37)  (48) (51) (48)

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  1,011  1,060  872   1,090  1,011  1,060 
    
  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 

Gross claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  520  588  694   263  520  588 

Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred

  (28) (13) (49)  (26) (28) (13)

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  492  575  645   237  492  575 

6 Other income

 

  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 

Increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  5,592  7,417  9,234 

Increase in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (5,592) (7,417) (9,234)

Property rentals

  53  55  54 

Other income

  135  159  93 

Other income

  188  214  147 

6 Other income

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

(Decrease)/increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (10,422) 5,592  7,417 

Decrease/(increase) in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  10,422  (5,592) (7,417)

Property rentals

  73  53  55 

Other income

  304  135  159 

Other income

  377  188  214 

Included in other income are sub-lease receiptsrentals of £18m (2006:(2007: £18m, 2005:2006: £18m).

Included, and in other income in 20072008 only is a loss on£47m gain from the part disposal of Monument credit card portfolio and gains on reinsurance transactions in 2007 and 2006.Visa IPO.

 

167 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 197


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

7 Impairment charges and other credit provisions

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 2005
£m
   2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Impairment charges on loans and advances

        

– New and increased impairment allowances

  2,871  2,722  2,129   5,116  2,871  2,722 

– Releases

  (338) (389) (333)  (358) (338) (389)

– Recoveries

  (227) (259) (222)  (174)  (227)  (259) 

Impairment charges on loans and advances

  2,306  2,074  1,574   4,584  2,306  2,074 
Other credit provisions   

Charge/(release) in respect of provision for undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided

  476  (6) (7)  329  476  (6) 

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions

  4,913  2,782  2,068 

Impairment charges on re verse repurchase agreements

  124     

Impairment on available for sale assets

  382  13  86 
 

Impairment charges on loans and advances and other credit provisions

  2,782  2,068  1,567 

Impairment on available for sale assets

  13  86  4 

Impairment charges and other credit provisions

  2,795  2,154  1,571   5,419  2,795  2,154 

An analysis of the impairment charges by class of financial instrument is included in Note 47 ‘Credit risk’.47.

8 Staff costs

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Salaries and accrued incentive payments

  6,993  6,635  5,036  6,273  6,993  6,635

Social security costs

  508  502  412  464  508  502

Pension costs – defined contribution plans

  141  128  76  237  141  128

Pension costs – defined benefit plans (Note 30)

  150  282  271  89  150  282

Other post-retirement benefits (Note 30)

  10  30  27  1  10  30
Other  603  592  496  715  603  592

Staff costs

  8,405  8,169  6,318  7,779  8,405  8,169

Included in salaries and incentive payments is £257m (2007: £551m, (2006: £640m, 2005: £338m)2006: £640m) arising from equity settled share-based payments, of which £23m (2007: £60m, (2006: £78m, 2005: £44m)2006: £78m) is a charge related to options-based schemes. Also included is £3m (2007: £8m, (2006: £6m, 2005: £nil)2006: £6m) arising from cash settled share-based payments.

The average number of persons employed by the Group worldwide during the year was 151,500 (2007: 128,900, (2006: 118,600, 2005: 92,800)2006: 118,600).

9 Administration and general expenses

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 2005
£m
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
  2006
£m

Administrative expenses

  3,978  3,980  3,443  5,153  3,978  3,980

Impairment charges

    

Impairment charges/(releases)

     

– property and equipment (Note 23)

  2  14    33  2  14

– intangible assets (Note 22)

  14  7  9  (3) 14  7

– goodwill (Note 21)

  111    

Operating lease rentals

  414  345  316  520  414  345

Gain on property disposals

  (267) (432)   (148)  (267)  (432)

Administration and general expenses

  4,141  3,914  3,768  5,666  4,141  3,914

Auditors’ remuneration

 

Auditors’ remuneration

          
  2007  2008
  Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m
  

Audit

£m

  

Audit

related

£m

  

Taxation

services

£m

  

Other

services

£m

  

Total

£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  7        7  12        12

Other services:

                    

Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s associates pursuant to legislation

  12        12  20        20

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation

  6  2      8    2      2

Other services relating to taxation

      8    8      10    10
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed to be entered into by or on behalf of the Company or any of its associates        5  5        3  3

Other

    2    2  4    4    1  5

Total auditors’ remuneration

  25  4  8  7  44  32  6  10  4  52

 

198

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

168


LOGO

LOGO

9 Administration and general expenses (continued)

Auditors’ remuneration (continued).

  2007
  2006  Audit

£m

  Audit

related

£m

  Taxation

services

£m

  Other

services

£m

  Total

£m

  Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  7        7  7        7

Other services:

          

Other services:

          

Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s associates pursuant to legislation

  11        11  12        12

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation

  10  1      11  6  2      8

Other services relating to taxation

      6    6      8    8
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed to be entered into by or on behalf of the Company or any of its associates        4  4        5  5

Other

    4    1  5    2    2  4

Total auditors’ remuneration

  28  5  6  5  44  25  4  8  7  44
          
  

 

2005

  2006
  Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m
  Audit

£m

  Audit

related

£m

  Taxation

services

£m

  Other

services

£m

  Total

£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  6        6  7        7

Other services:

          

Other services:

          
Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s associates pursuant to legislation  8        8  11        11
Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation  1        1  10  1      11
Other services relating to taxation      4    4      6    6
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed to be entered into by or on behalf of the Company or any of its associates        3  3        4  4

Other

    7      7    4    1  5

Total auditors’ remuneration

  15  7  4  3  29  28  5  6  5  44

The figures shown in the above table relate to fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its associates. Fees paid to other auditors not associated with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries were £3m (2007: £2m, (2006: £2m, 2005: £3m)2006: £2m).

Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s associates pursuant to legislation comprise the fees for the statutory audit of the subsidiaries and associated pension schemes both inside and outside Great Britain and fees for the work performed by the associates of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The fees relating to the audit of the associated pension schemes were £0.2m (2007: £0.3m, (2006: £0.3m, 2005:2006: £0.3m).

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation comprise services in relation to statutory and regulatory filings. These includesinclude audit services for the review of the interim financial information under the Listing Rules of the UK listing authority and fees paid for reporting under Section 404 of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404). In 2008 fees paid for reporting under section 404 are not separately identifiable from the fees of the audit of the Group’s annual accounts and the Company’s associates. In addition, other services include Section 404 advisory, IFRS advisory,reporting accountant work for capital raising, securitisations and services relating to acquisition activities.

Taxation services include compliance services such as tax return preparation and advisory services such as consultation on tax matters, tax advice relating to transactions and other tax planning and advice.

Services relating to corporate finance transactions comprise due diligence related to transactions and accounting consultations and auditsother work in connection with such transactions.

169

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

10 Tax

The charge for tax is based upon the standard UK corporation tax rate of 30% (2006:28.5% (2007: 30%, 2005:2006: 30%) and comprises:

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Current tax charge

    

Current year

  2,385  1,929  1,583 

Adjustment for prior years

  (11) 8  (59)

 

Total

  2,374  1,937  1,524 

Deferred tax (credit)/charge

    

Current year

  (367) (16) (14)

Adjustment for prior years

  (26) 20  (71)

 

Total

  (393) 4  (85)

 

Tax charge

  1,981  1,941  1,439 

 

The effective tax rate for the years 2007, 2006 and 2005 is lower than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 30% (2006: 30%, 2005: 30%). The differences are set out below:

 

  

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Profit before tax

  7,076  7,136  5,280 

Tax charge at standard UK corporation tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%, 2005: 30%)

  2,123  2,141  1,584 

Adjustment for prior years

  (37) 24  (133)

Differing overseas tax rates

  (77) (17) (35)

Non-taxable gains and income (including amounts offset by unrecognised tax losses)

  (136) (393) (129)

Share-based payments

  72  27  (12)

Deferred tax assets not previously recognised

  (158) (4) (7)

Change in tax rates

  24  4  3 

Other non-allowable expenses

  170  159  168 

 

Overall tax charge

  1,981  1,941  1,439 

 

Effective tax rate

  28%  27%  27% 
   2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

 

Current tax charge/(credit)

    

Current year

  1,563  2,385  1,929 

Adjustment for prior years

  97  (11) 8 
   1,660  2,374  1,937 

Deferred tax (credit)/charge

    

Current year

  (597) (367) (16)

Adjustment for prior years

  (273) (26) 20 
   (870) (393) 4 

Total charge/(credit)

  790  1,981  1,941 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

199


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

10 Tax (continued)

The effective tax rate for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 is lower than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%). The differences are set out below:

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Profit before tax

  6,077  7,076  7,136 

Tax charge at standard UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%)

  1,732  2,123  2,141 

Adjustment for prior years

  (176) (37) 24 

Differing overseas tax rates

  215  (77) (17)

Non-taxable gains and income (including amounts offset by unrecognised tax losses)

  (833) (136) (393)

Share-based payments

  229  72  27 

Deferred tax assets not previously recognised

  (514) (158) (4)

Change in tax rates

  (1) 24  4 

Other non-allowable expenses

  138  170  159 

Overall tax charge

  790  1,981  1,941 

Effective tax rate

  13%  28%  27% 

The effective rate of tax for 2008, based on profit before tax, was 13% (2007: 28%). The effective tax rate differs from the 2007 effective rate and the UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% principally due to the Lehman Brothers North American businesses acquisition. Under IFRS the gain on acquisition of £2,262m is calculated net of deferred tax liabilities included in the acquisition balance sheet and is thus not subject to further tax in calculating the tax charge for the year. Furthermore, Barclays has tax losses previously unrecognised as a deferred tax asset but capable of sheltering part of this deferred tax liability. This gives rise to a tax benefit of £492m which, in accordance with IAS 12, is included as a credit within the tax charge for the year. The effective rate has been adversely impacted by the effect of the fall in the Barclays share price on the deferred tax asset recognised on share awards. In common with prior years there have been offsetting adjustments relating to different overseas tax rates, disallowable expenditure and non taxable gains and income.

11 Earnings per share

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 2005
£m
   2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Profit attributable to equity holders of parent

  4,417  4,571  3,447   4,382  4,417  4,571 

Dilutive impact of convertible options

  (25) (30) (38)  (24) (25) (30)

Profit attributable to equity holders of parent including dilutive impact of convertible options

  4,392  4,541  3,409   4,358  4,392  4,541 
     
  2007
million
 2006
million
 2005
million
   2008
million
 2007
million
 2006
million
 

Basic weighted average number of shares in issue

  6,410  6,357  6,337   7,389  6,410  6,357 

Number of potential ordinary shares

  177  150  149   188  177  150 

Diluted weighted average number of shares

  6,587  6,507  6,486   7,577  6,587  6,507 
   
  p p p   p  p  p 

Basic earnings per share

  68.9  71.9  54.4   59.3  68.9  71.9 

Diluted earnings per share

  66.7  69.8  52.6   57.5  66.7  69.8 

The calculation of basic earnings per share is based on the profit attributable to equity holders of the parent and the number of basic weighted average number of shares excluding own shares held in employee benefits trusts and shares held for trading.

The basic and diluted weighted average number of shares in issue in the year ended 31st December 2008 reflects 1,802 million shares issued during the year and the 2,642 million shares that will be issued following conversion in full of the Mandatorily Convertible Notes, included from the date of issue and the date the contract was entered into respectively. As a result, the weighted average number of shares in issue in the year ended 31st December 2008 was increased by 1,034 million shares as a result of this increase.

When calculating the diluted earnings per share, the profit attributable to equity holders of the parent is adjusted for the conversion of outstanding options into shares within Absa Group Limited and Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited. The weighted average number of ordinary shares excluding own shares held in employee benefit trusts and shares held for trading, is adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, totalling 188 million (2007: 177 million, (2006:2006: 150 million, 2005: 149 million).

Of the total number of employee share options and share awards at 31st December 2007, none2008, 64 million were anti-dilutive (2006:(2007: nil, 2006: 5 million, 2005: nil)million).

Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Group continued to make on-market purchases of treasury shares under its various employee share schemes. No adjustment has been made to earnings per share in respect of these purchases.

 

200

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

170


LOGO

LOGO

12 Trading portfolio

 

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 
  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Trading portfolio assets

      

Treasury and other eligible bills

  2,094  2,960   4,544  2,094 

Debt securities

  152,778  140,576   148,686  152,778 

Equity securities

  36,307  31,548   30,535  36,307 

Traded loans

  1,780  1,843   1,070  1,780 

Commodities

  732  940   802  732 

Trading portfolio assets

  193,691  177,867   185,637  193,691 

Trading portfolio liabilities

      

Treasury and other eligible bills

  (486) (608)  (79) (486)

Debt securities

  (50,506) (58,142)  (44,309) (50,506)

Equity securities

  (13,702) (12,697)  (14,919) (13,702)

Commodities

  (708) (427)  (167) (708)

Trading portfolio liabilities

  (65,402) (71,874)  (59,474) (65,402)

13 Financial assets designated at fair value

Held on own account

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Loans and advances

  23,491  13,196  30,187  23,491

Debt securities

  24,217  12,100  8,628  24,217

Equity securities

  5,376  3,711  6,496  5,376

Other financial assets

  3,545  2,792  9,231  3,545

Financial assets designated at fair value – held on own account

  56,629  31,799  54,542  56,629

The maximum exposure to credit risk on loans and advances designated at fair value at 31st December 20072008 was £23,491m (2006: £13,196m)£30,187m (2007: £23,491m). The amount by which related credit derivatives and similar instruments mitigate the exposure to credit risk at 31st December was £2,605m (2006: £28m)£2,084m (2007: £2,605m).

The net loss attributable to changes in credit risk for loans and advances designated at fair value was £401m£2,550m in 2007 (2006: £nil; 2005; £nil)2008 (2007: £401m). The gains or losses on related credit derivatives was £4m£519m for the year (2006: £nil; 2005; £nil)(2007: £4m loss).

The cumulative net loss attributable to changes in credit risk for loans and advances designated at fair value since initial recognition is £401m£2,149m at 31st December 2007 (2006: £3m; 2005: £3m)2008 (2007: £401m). The cumulative change in fair value of related credit derivatives at 31st December 20072008 is £4m (2006: £nil; 2005; £nil)£523m (2007: £4m).

Held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts/liabilities arising from investment contracts

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
   2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

Financial assets designated at fair value held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  90,851  82,798   66,657  90,851 

Cash and bank balances within the portfolio

  1,788  1,839   2,526  1,788 

Assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  92,639  84,637   69,183  92,639 

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (92,639) (84,637)  (69,183) (92,639)

A portion of the Group’s fund management business takes the legal form of investment contracts, under which legal title to the underlying investment is held by the Group, but the inherent risks and rewards in the investments are borne by the investors. In the normal course of business, the Group’s financial interest in such investments is restricted to fees for investment management services.

Due to the nature of these contracts, the carrying value of the assets is always the same as the value of the liabilities and any change in the value of the assets results in an equal but opposite change in the value of the amounts due to the policyholders.

The Group is therefore not exposed to the financial risks – market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk inherent in the investments and they are omitted from the disclosures on financial risks in Notes 4647 to 48.49.

In the balance sheet, the assets are included as ‘Financial assets designated at fair value – held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts’. Cash balances within the portfolio have been included in the Group’s cash balances. The associated obligation to deliver the value of the investments to customers at their fair value on balance sheet date is included as ‘Liabilities to customers under investment contracts’.

The increase/decrease in the value arising from the return on the investments and the corresponding increase/decrease in linked liabilities to customers is included in the Other income note in Note 6.

 

171 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 201


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

14 Derivative financial instruments

Financial instruments

The Group’s objectives and policies on managing the risks that arise in connection with derivatives, including the policies for hedging, are included in Note 4546 to Note 48 under the headings ‘Financial Risks’, ‘Market Risk’, ‘Credit Risk’ and ‘Liquidity Risk’.

The notional amounts of certain types of financial instruments provide a basis for comparison with instruments recognised on the balance sheet but do not necessarily indicate the amounts of future cash flows involved or the current fair value of the instruments and, therefore, do not indicate the Group’s exposure to credit or price risks. The derivative instruments become favourable (assets) or unfavourable (liabilities) as a result of fluctuations in market rates or prices relative to their terms. The aggregate contractual or notional amount of derivative financial instruments on hand, the extent to which instruments are favourable or unfavourable and, thus the aggregate fair values of derivative financial assets and liabilities can fluctuate significantly.

The fair value of a derivative contract represents the amount at which that contract could be exchanged in an arms-length transaction, calculated at market rates current at the balance sheet date.49.

The fair values and notional amounts of derivative instruments held for trading are set out in the following table:

 

  2007    2006   2008 2007 
Year ended 31st December
Derivatives held for trading
  Notional
contract
amount
£m
  Fair value      Notional
contract
amount
£m
  Fair value 
  

Notional
contract
amount

£m

  Fair value  

Notional
contract
amount

£m

  Fair value 
Year ended 31st December
Derivatives held for trading
Notional
contract
amount
£m
      
Assets
£m
      
Liabilities
£m
     Notional
contract
amount
£m
      
Assets
£m
      
Liabilities
£m
   Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
   Assets
£m
  

Liabilities

£m

 
                    

Forward foreign exchange

  1,041,781  11,381  (11,629)   767,734  8,074  (7,808)  1,374,108  44,631  (46,371) 1,041,781  11,381  (11,629)

Currency swaps

  562,682  15,617  (14,676)   411,889  10,029  (10,088)  828,983  47,077  (53,116) 562,682  15,617  (14,676)

OTC options bought and sold

  464,575  3,350  (3,995)   320,184  3,923  (3,849)  426,739  15,405  (14,331) 464,575  3,350  (3,995)

OTC derivatives

  2,069,038  30,348  (30,300)   1,499,807  22,026  (21,745)  2,629,830  107,113  (113,818) 2,069,038  30,348  (30,300)

Exchange traded futures – bought and sold

  139,199        852       8,008      139,199     

Exchange traded options – bought and sold

  132        115       1,295      132     

Foreign exchange derivatives

  2,208,369  30,348  (30,300)   1,500,774  22,026  (21,745)  2,639,133  107,113  (113,818) 2,208,369  30,348  (30,300)

Interest rate derivatives

                        

Interest rate swaps

  11,758,215  111,746  (110,680)   8,718,015  61,267  (61,510)  17,624,591  498,661  (496,292) 11,758,215  111,746  (110,680)

Forward rate agreements

  1,960,106  755  (738)   1,335,594  337  (374)  4,377,619  8,853  (8,224) 1,960,106  755  (738)

OTC options bought and sold

  3,776,600  27,337  (26,944)   2,301,239  13,977  (13,558)  5,598,960  105,743  (101,005) 3,776,600  27,337  (26,944)

OTC derivatives

  17,494,921  139,838  (138,362)   12,354,848  75,581  (75,442)  27,601,170  613,257  (605,521) 17,494,921  139,838  (138,362)

Exchange traded futures – bought and sold

  903,516        1,057,767  188  (256)  586,312      903,516     

Exchange traded options – bought and sold

  269,095  102  (64)   848,629  241  (156)  276,752      269,095  102  (64)

Exchange traded swaps

  4,941,417        3,405,109       9,411,001      4,941,417     

Interest rate derivatives

  23,608,949  139,940  (138,426)   17,666,353  76,010  (75,854)  37,875,235  613,257  (605,521) 23,608,949  139,940  (138,426)

Credit derivatives

                        

Swaps

  2,472,249  38,696  (35,814)   1,224,548  9,275  (8,894)  4,129,244  184,072  (170,011) 2,472,249  38,696  (35,814)

Equity and stock index derivatives

                        

OTC options bought and sold

  145,399  11,293  (15,743)   114,227  11,171  (15,613)  180,157  19,576  (19,998) 145,399  11,293  (15,743)

Equity swaps and forwards

  36,149  1,057  (1,193)   24,580  656  (846)  51,267  3,432  (2,819) 36,149  1,057  (1,193)

OTC derivatives

  181,548  12,350  (16,936)   138,807  11,827  (16,459)  231,424  23,008  (22,817) 181,548  12,350  (16,936)

Exchange traded futures – bought and sold

  31,519        30,159  154  (176)  38,340      31,519     

Exchange traded options – bought and sold

  30,930  848  (2,200)   30,473  161  (171)  121,712  5,551  (3,109) 30,930  848  (2,200)

Equity and stock index derivatives

  243,997  13,198  (19,136)   199,439  12,142  (16,806)  391,476  28,559  (25,926) 243,997  13,198  (19,136)

Commodity derivatives

                        

OTC options bought and sold

  95,032  4,496  (4,720)   52,899  2,568  (2,443)  78,680  6,565  (10,261) 95,032  4,496  (4,720)

Commodity swaps and forwards

  276,102  19,075  (18,039)   164,863  14,933  (13,497)  407,015  38,316  (35,556) 276,102  19,075  (18,039)

OTC derivatives

  371,134  23,571  (22,759)   217,762  17,501  (15,940)  485,695  44,881  (45,817) 371,134  23,571  (22,759)

Exchange traded futures – bought and sold

  228,465        68,710  13  (33)  165,564  3,953  (2,745) 228,465     

Exchange traded options – bought and sold

  66,732  1,197  (943)   9,169  306  (474)  54,435  161  (233) 66,732  1,197  (943)

Commodity derivatives

  666,331  24,768  (23,702)   295,641  17,820  (16,447)  705,694  48,995  (48,795) 666,331  24,768  (23,702)

Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for trading

  29,199,895  246,950  (247,378)   20,886,755  137,273  (139,746)  45,740,782  981,996  (964,071) 29,199,895  246,950  (247,378)

 

202

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

172


LOGO

LOGO

14 Derivative financial instruments (continued)

The fair values and notional amounts of derivative instruments held for risk management are set out in the following table:

 

Year ended 31st December  2007 2006 
Notional
contract
amount
£m
     Fair value  Notional
contract
amount
£m
     Fair value 
  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 
 
   Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 
 
  2008 2007 
  Notional  Fair value Notional  Fair value 

Year ended 31st December

Derivatives held for risk management

  contract
amount
£m
  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 contract
amount
£m
  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

                          

Currency swaps

  586    (271)      

Interest rate swaps

  38,453    239  (437) 51,614    132  (312)  60,669  1,013  (1,011) 38,453  239  (437)

Equity options

  54    41             400    (154) 54  41   

Forward foreign exchange

  2,256    178             1,871  309  (354) 2,256  178   

Exchange traded interest rate swaps

  14,529        12,077         20,028      14,529     

Commodity swaps and forwards

          204      (89)

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

  55,292     458  (437) 63,895     132  (401)  83,554  1,322  (1,790) 55,292  458  (437)

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges

                          

Currency swaps

  4,299    81  (75) 1,454      (233)  2,666  283  (105) 4,299  81  (75)

Interest rate swaps

  18,450    323  (195) 16,940    240  (152)  14,010  1,052  (357) 18,450  323  (195)

Equity options

  1,203    58  (58) 1,029    58  (56)  259  124  (110) 1,203  58  (58)

Forward foreign exchange

           66        

Exchange traded interest rate swaps

  18,767           

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges

  23,952     462  (328) 19,489     298  (441)  35,702  1,459  (572) 23,952  462  (328)

Derivatives designated as hedges of net investments

                          

Forward foreign exchange

  4,223    31  (57) 2,730      (78)  2,019  4  (76) 4,223  31  (57)

Currency swaps

  8,397     187  (88) 9,320     650  (31)  3,675  21  (1,563) 8,397  187  (88)

Derivatives designated as hedges of net investment

  12,620     218  (145) 12,050     650  (109)  5,694  25  (1,639) 12,620  218  (145)

Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for risk management

  91,864     1,138  (910) 95,434     1,080  (951)  124,950  2,806  (4,001) 91,864  1,138  (910)

Interest rate derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, primarily hedge the exposure to cash flow variability from interest rates of variable rate loans to banks and customers, variable rate debt securities held and highly probable forecast financing transactions and reinvestments.

Interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedges primarily hedge the interest rate risk of fixed rate borrowings in issue, fixed rate loans to banks and customers and investments in fixed rate debt securities held.

Currency derivatives are primarily designated as hedges of the foreign currency risk of net investments in foreign operations.

The Group’s total derivative asset and liability position as reported on the balance sheet is as follows:

 

  2007   2006   
  Notional
contract
amount
£m
     Fair value  Notional
contract
amount

£m

     Fair value   2008 2007 

Year ended 31st December

  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 
 
   Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 
 
  Notional  Fair value Notional  Fair value 
Year ended 31st December

contract
amount

£m

  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 

contract
amount

£m

  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 
  29,199,895    246,950  (247,378) 20,886,755    137,273  (139,746)  45,740,782  981,996  (964,071) 29,199,895  246,950  (247,378)

Total derivative assets/(liabilities) held for risk management

  91,864     1,138  (910) 95,434     1,080  (951)  124,950  2,806  (4,001) 91,864  1,138  (910)

Derivative assets/(liabilities)

  29,291,759     248,088  (248,288) 20,982,189     138,353  (140,697)  45,865,732  984,802  (968,072) 29,291,759  248,088  (248,288)

Derivative assets and liabilities subject to counterparty netting agreements amounted to £199bn (2006: £102bn)£862bn (2007: £199bn). Additionally, wethe Group held £17bn (2006: £8bn)£55bn (2007: £17bn) of collateral against the net derivative assets exposure.

 

173 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 203


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

14 Derivative financial instruments (continued)

The Group has hedged the following forecast cash flows, which primarily vary with interest rates. These cash flows are expected to impact the income statement in the following periods, excluding any hedge adjustments that may be applied:

 

  2007  2008
  Total
£m
  Up to
one year
£m
  Between
one to
two years
£m
  Between
two to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
four years
£m
  Between
four to
five years
£m
  More than
five years
£m
  Total
£m
  Up to
one year
£m
  Between
one to
two years
£m
  Between
two to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
four years
£m
  Between
four to
five years
£m
  More than
five years
£m

Forecast receivable cash flows

  4,329  1,593  987  903  535  254  57  2,569  875  586  596  347  127  38

Forecast payable cash flows

  2,121  394  369  335  283  244  496  974  275  166  175  145  123  90
 
  2006  2007
  Total
£m
  Up to
one year
£m
  Between
one to
two years
£m
  Between
two to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
four years
£m
  Between
four to
five years
£m
  More than
five years
£m
  Total
£m
  Up to
one year
£m
  Between
one to
two years
£m
  Between
two to
three years
£m
  Between
three to
four years
£m
  Between
four to
five years
£m
  More than
five years
£m

Forecast receivable cash flows

  5,111  1,500  1,452  954  689  410  106  4,329  1,593  987  903  535  254  57

Forecast payable cash flows

  1,280  704  349  121  73  30  3  2,121  394  369  335  283  244  496

The maximum length of time over which the Group hedges exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecast transactions, excluding those forecast transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments, is 10seven years (2006: 8(2007: ten years).

All gains or losses on hedging derivatives relating to forecast transactions, which are no longer expected to occur, have been recycled to the income statement.

A lossgain of £66m£2,439m on hedging instruments was recognised in relation to fair value hedges in net interest income (2006: £460m)(2007: £66m loss). A gainloss of £70m£2,423m on the hedged items was recognised in relation to fair value hedges in net interest income (2006: £465m)(2007: £70m gain).

Ineffectiveness recognised in relation to cash flow hedges in net interest income was a gain of £21m (2006: loss of £23m)£14m (2007: £21m). Ineffectiveness recognised in relation to hedges of net investment was a gain of £4m (2006: £13m)£2m (2007: £4m).

15 Loans and advances to banks and customers

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
   2008
£m
  2007
£m

Gross loans and advances to banks

  47,758  40,123

Less: Allowance for impairment

  (51)  (3)

Loans and advances to banks

  40,123  30,930   47,707  40,120

Gross loans and advances to customers

  468,338  349,167

Less: Allowance for impairment

  (3) (4)  (6,523)  (3,769)

Loans and advances to banks

  40,120  30,926 

Loans and advances to customers

  349,167  285,631   461,815  345,398

Less: Allowance for impairment

  (3,769) (3,331)

Loans and advances to customers

  345,398  282,300 

 

204

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

174


LOGO

LOGO

16 Available for sale financial investments

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
   

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

Debt securities

  38,673  47,912   58,831  38,673 

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  2,723  2,420   4,003  2,723 

Equity securities

  1,676  1,371   2,142  1,676 

Available for sale financial investments

  43,072 51,703   64,976  43,072 
      
Movement in available for sale financial investments  2007
£m
 2006
£m
   2008
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 

At beginning of year

  51,703 53,497   43,072  51,703 

Exchange and other adjustments

  1,499  (3,999)  14,275  1,499 

Acquisitions and transfers

  26,920  47,086   59,703  26,920 

Disposals (through sale and redemption)

  (37,498) (44,959)  (50,501) (37,498)

Gains from changes in fair value recognised in equity

  486  162 

(Losses)/gains from changes in fair value recognised in equity

  (1,174) 486 

Impairment

  (13) (86)  (382) (13)

Amortisation of discounts/premium

  (25) 2   (17) (25)

At end of year

  43,072  51,703   64,976  43,072 

17 Securities borrowing, securities lending, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements

Amounts included in the balance sheet and reported on a net basis where the Group has the intention and the legal ability to settle net or realise simultaneously were as follows:

(a)Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

Amounts advanced to counterparties under reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral provided under stock borrowing agreements are treated as collateralised loans receivable. The related securities purchased or borrowed subject to an agreement with the counterparty to repurchase them are not recognised on balance sheet where the risks and rewards of ownership remain with the counterparty.

 

    2008
£m
  2007
£m

Banks

  55,471  86,710

Customers

  74,883  96,365

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral held on securities borrowed

  130,354  183,075

(a)(b)Reverse repurchaseRepurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowedlent

    2007
£m
  2006
£m

Banks

  86,710  85,336

Customers

  96,365  88,754

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral held on securities borrowed

  183,075  174,090

(b) Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

Securities that are not recorded on the balance sheet (for example, securities that have been obtained as a result of reverse repurchase and stock borrow transactions) may also be lent or sold subject to a commitment to repurchase – such securities remain off balanceoff-balance sheet. In both instances, amounts received from counterparty are treated as liabilities, which at 31st December were as follows:

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m

Banks

  97,297  79,833

Customers

  72,132  57,123

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  169,429  136,956

18 Other assets

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m

Sundry debtors

  4,042  4,298

Prepayments

  551  658

Accrued income

  400  722
Reinsurance assets  157  172
Other assets  5,150  5,850
    2008
£m
  2007
£m

Banks

  87,403  97,297

Customers

  94,882  72,132

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  182,285  169,429

18 Other assets

    2008
£m
  2007
£m

Sundry debtors

  4,814  4,042

Prepayments

  882  551

Accrued income

  483  400

Reinsurance assets

  123  157

Other assets

  6,302  5,150

Included in the above are balances of £3,859m (2006: £5,065m)£4,704m (2007: £3,859m) expected to be recovered within no more than 12 months after the balance sheet date; and balances of £1,291m (2006: £785m)£1,598m (2007: £1,291m) expected to be recovered more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Other assets comprise £3,966m (2006: £4,097m)include £3,096m (2007: £3,966m) of receivables which meet the definition of financial assets.

 

175 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 205


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

19 Current and deferredDeferred tax

The components of deferred taxes disclosed on the balance sheet are as follows:

 

   2007  2006 
    Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
  Assets
£m
  Liabilities
£m
 

Current tax

  518  1,311  557  1,020 

Deferred tax

  2,334  1,726  2,005  1,523 

Deferred taxes are calculated on all temporary differences under the liability method. The movement on the deferred tax account is as follows:

 

 

            2007
£m
  

2006

£m

 

At beginning of year

      482  (14)
Income statement credit/(charge)      393  (4)
Equity       

Available for sale investments

      13  4 

Cash flow hedges

      (132) 128 

Share-based payments

      (63) 24 

Other equity movements

      (125) 48 
Acquisitions and disposals      33  264 
Exchange and other adjustments        7  32 

 

At end of year

        608  482 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following items:

 

 

            2007
£m
  

2006

£m

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

       
Accelerated tax depreciation      803  705 
Available for sale investments      101  116 
Cash flow hedges      51   
Other      771  702 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

        1,726  1,523 

 

Deferred tax assets

       
Pensions and other retirement benefits      491  622 
Allowance for impairment on loans      108  69 
Other provisions      377  436 
Cash flow hedges        44  91 

Tax losses carried forward

      215  1 
Share-based payments      428  380 
Other      671  406 

 

Deferred tax assets

        2,334  2,005 

 

Net deferred tax asset

 

          608  482 

 

Disclosed as deferred tax liabilities

        855  282 
Disclosed as deferred tax assets        1,463  764 

 

Net deferred tax asset

        608  482 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m

Deferred tax liability

  304  855

Deferred tax asset

  2,668  1,463

Net deferred tax

  2,364  608

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

176


LOGODeferred taxes are calculated on all temporary differences under the liability method. The movement on the deferred tax account is as follows:

 

19 Current and deferred tax (continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if, and only if, there is a legally enforceable right to set off and the balances relate to income tax payable to the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities within the same tax group where there is the intention and ability to settle on a net basis or realise the assets and liabilities simultaneously.

    Fixed
asset timing
differences
£m
  Available
for sale
investments
£m
  Cash flow
hedges
£m
  Pensions
and other
retirement
benefits
£m
  Allowance
for
impairment
on loans
£m
  Other
provisions
£m
  Tax losses
carried
forward
£m
  Share based
payments
£m
  Other
£m
  Total
£m
 

Liabilities

  (803) (101) (51)           (771) (1,726)

Assets

      44  491  108  377  215  428  671  2,334 

At 1st January 2008

  (803) (101) (7) 491  108  377  215  428  (100) 608 

Income statement

  124  8  5  (90) 223  (10) 598  (215) 227  870 

Equity

    103  (161)       750  (33) (13) 646 

Acquisitions and disposals

  (195)         56    75  (211) (275)

Exchange and other adjustments

  16  1  41  2  25  109  96  87  138  515 
   (858) 11  (122) 403  356  532  1,659  342  41  2,364 

Liabilities

  (945) (46) (368)           (1,075) (2,434)

Assets

  87  57  246  403  356  532  1,659  342  1,116  4,798 

At 31st December 2008

  (858) 11  (122) 403  356  532  1,659  342  41  2,364 
             
                                

Liabilities

  (705) (116)             (702) (1,523)

Assets

      91  622  69  436  1  380  406  2,005 

At 1st January 2007

  (705) (116) 91  622  69  436  1  380  (296) 482 

Income statement

  (118) 1   (96) 28  165  214  100  99  393 

Equity

    13  (132)         (63) (125) (307)

Acquisitions and disposals

            45      (12) 33 

Exchange and other adjustments

  20  1  34  (35) 11  (269)   11  234  7 
   (803) (101) (7) 491  108  377  215  428  (100) 608 

Liabilities

  (803) (101) (51)           (771) (1,726)

Assets

      44  491  108  377  215  428  671  2,334 

At 31st December 2007

  (803) (101) (7) 491  108  377  215  428  (100) 608 

The amount of deferred tax liability expected to be settled after more than 12 months is £1,468m (2006: £1,046m)£1,949m (2007: £1,468m).

The amount of deferred tax asset expected to be recovered after more than 12 months is £1,950m (2006: £1,582m)£4,593m (2007: £1,950m).

The deferred tax assets balance includes £450m (2006: £106m)£2,139m (2007: £450m) which is the excess deferred tax assets over deferred tax liabilities in entities which have suffered a loss in either the current or prior year. This is based on management assessment that it is probable that the relevant entities will have taxable profits against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

The deferredDeferred tax (credit)/chargeassets have not been recognised in the income statement comprises the followingrespect of deductible temporary differences:

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Accelerated tax depreciation

  118  120 

Pensions and other retirement benefits

  96  (24)

Allowance for impairment on loans

  (28) (30)

Other provisions

  (165) (105)

Tax losses carry forward

  (214) 25 

Available for sale investments

  (1) 8 

Cash flow hedges

    (14)

Share-based payments

  (100) (77)

Other

  (99) 101 

Total

 

  (393) 4 

 

Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of the following items:

   

   2007
£m
  2006
£m

Deductible temporary differences (gross)

  247  395

Unused tax losses (gross)

  1,683  190

Unused tax credits

  126  98

differences (gross) £9m (2007: £247m), unused tax losses (gross) of £4,083m (2007: £1,683m) and unused tax credits of £46m (2007: £126m). The following tax losses expire: £9m£3,854m in 2008 to 2011, £9m in 2011, £9m in 2012 and £1,201m in 2027.2028. The other tax losses, tax credits and temporary differences do not expire under current tax legislation. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of these items because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the Group can utilise the benefits. The unused tax losses include amounts relating to non-UK branches of Barclays Bank PLC where the future tax benefit might be restricted to the amount in excess of the UK rate.

The amount of temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised is £5,722m (2006: £3,387m)£8,429m (2007: £5,722m).

The tax charge for the period was based on a UK corporation tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%). The effective rate of tax for 2007, based on profit before tax, was 28% (2006: 27.2%). The effective tax rate differed from 30% as it took account of the different tax rate applied to profits earned outside the UK, non-taxable gains and income and adjustments to prior year tax provisions. The forthcoming change in the UK rate of corporation tax from 30% to 28% on 1st April 2008 led to an additional tax charge in 2007 as a result of its effect on the Group’s net deferred tax asset.

 

177206 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

LOGO

20 InvestmentInvestments in associates and joint ventures

Share of net assets

Share of net assets                   
   

 

Associates

  Joint ventures  Total 
    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

 

At beginning of year

  74  427  154  119  228  546 

Share of results before tax

  35  63  10  (6) 45  57 

Share of tax

  (2) (10) (1) (1) (3) (11)

 

Share of post-tax results

  33  53  9  (7) 42  46 

 

Dividends paid

    (17)       (17)

New investments

  7  2  8  7  15  9 

Acquisitions

  56  51  150  102  206  153 

Disposals

  (47) (404) (72) (72) (119) (476)

Exchange and other adjustments

  (33) (38) 38  5  5  (33)

 

At end of year

  90  74  287  154  377  228 

Goodwill included above:

       
   

 

Associates

  Joint ventures  Total 
    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

 

Cost

       

 

At beginning of year

  1  122  40  83  41  205 

Acquisitions

             

Disposals

  (1) (121) (16)   (17) (121)

Transfer

      3  (43) 3  (43)

 

At end of year

    1  27  40  27  41 

   Associates  Joint ventures  Total 
   2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

At beginning of year

  90  74  287  154  377  228 

Share of results before tax

  25  35  (6) 10  19  45 

Share of tax

  (3) (2) (2) (1) (5) (3)

Share of post-tax results

  22  33  (8) 9  14  42 

New investments

  6  7  27  8  33  15 

Acquisitions

  62  56  1  150  63  206 

Disposals

  (20) (47) (117) (72) (137) (119)

Exchange and other adjustments

  15  (33) (24) 38  (9) 5 

At end of year

  175  90  166  287  341  377 

Goodwill included above:

       
       
   Associates  Joint ventures  Total 
   2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

Cost

       

At beginning of year

    1  27  40  27  41 

Disposals

    (1)   (16)   (17)

Exchange and other adjustments

      4  3  4  3 

At end of year

      31  27  31  27 

The Group has investments in two associates listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The fair value of the Group’s investment in Ambit Properties Limited an associate listed onis £51m (2007: £42m) and in Pinnacle Point Group Limited, acquired during 2008, is £60m.

Acquisitions of joint ventures and associates

During the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, is £42m.

Disposal ofyear the Group made additional investments in associates and joint ventures

On 29th June 2007 and 2nd July 2007, the Group disposed of its investment in Gabetti Property Solutions for aggregate cash consideration net of transaction costs of £13m, which after deducting the Group’s share of its net assets on the dates of disposal, resulted in a profit of £8m.

On 24th September 2007, the£96m (2007: £221m), including new associates and joint ventures amounting to £63m (2007: £206m) primarily relating to Pinnacle Point Group disposed of its investment in Intelenet Global Services for a cash consideration, net of transaction costs of £22m, which, after deducting the Group’s share of its net assets on the date of disposal, resulted in a profit of £13m.Limited.

Summarised financial information for the Group’s associates and joint ventures is set out below:

 

  2007 2006   2008  2007 
  Associates
£m
 Joint
ventures
£m
 

Associates

£m

 Joint
ventures
£m
   Associates

£m

 

 

 Joint

ventures
£m

 

 
 

 Associates

£m

 

 

 Joint

ventures

£m

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

  588  632  599  142   788  104  588  632 

Financial investments

  239  8  4  2   124    239  8 

Trading portfolio assets

      1   

Loans to banks and customers

  516  2,372  1,378  797   271  2,883  516  2,372 

Other assets

  1,387  314  541  199   1,343  418  1,387  314 

Total assets

  2,730  3,326  2,523  1,140   2,526  3,405  2,730  3,326 

Deposits from banks and customers

  1,515  2,189  1,421  769   1,376  2,207  1,515  2,189 

Trading portfolio liabilities

      1   

Other liabilities

  902  458  887  187   985  890  902  458 

Shareholders’ equity

  313  679  214  184   165  308  313  679 

Total liabilities

  2,730  3,326  2,523  1,140   2,526  3,405  2,730  3,326 

Net income

  528  340  538  178   859  357  528  340 

Operating expenses

  (404) (292) (334) (178)  (732) (364) (404) (292)

Profit before tax

  124  48  204   

Profit after tax

  104  40  186  (2)

Profit/(loss) before tax

  127  (7) 124  48 

Profit/(loss) after tax

  52  (11) 104  40 

The amounts included above, which include the entire assets, liabilities and net income of the investees, not just the Group’s share, are based on accounts made up to 31st December 20072008 with the exception of certain undertakings for which the amounts are based on accounts made up to dates not earlier than three months before the balance sheet date.

Associates and joint ventures in 20072008 includes £1,728m (2006: £1,525m)£1,651m (2007: £1,728m) of assets, £1,537m (2006: £1,380m)£1,525m (2007: £1,537m) of liabilities and £18m (2006: £25m)£9m (2007: £18m) of profit after tax in associates and joint ventures within the Absa Group.

The Group’s share of commitments and contingencies of its associates and joint ventures is £6m (2006: £nil)£nil (2007: £6m).

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 178
 207


LOGONotes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

21 Goodwill

 

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 
  

 

2007
£m

 2006
£m
 

Net book value

      

At beginning of year

  6,092  6,022   7,014  6,092 

Acquisitions

  879  390   400  879 

Disposals

  (17) (14)  (10) (17)

Impairment charge

  (111)  

Exchange and other adjustments

  60  (306)  332  60 

At end of year

  7,014  6,092   7,625  7,014 

Goodwill is allocated to business operations according to business segments identified by the Group under IAS 14,IFRS 8, as follows:

 

    

 

2007
£m

  2006
£m

 

UK Banking

  3,131  3,132

Barclaycard

  400  403

International Retail and Commercial Banking

  1,682  1,481

Barclays Capital

  147  86

Barclays Global Investors

  1,261  673

Barclays Wealth

  393  317

 

Goodwill

  7,014  6,092

The Barclays Financial Planning business previously managed and reported within Barclays Wealth, is now managed and reported within UK Banking. Goodwill of £312m relating to this business has been transferred to UK Banking and the comparative figures restated.

    2008
£m
  2007
£m

UK Retail Banking

  3,139  3,138

Barclays Commercial Bank

  10  9

Barclaycard

  413  408

GRCB – Western Europe

  705  551

GRCB – Emerging Markets

  292  45

GRCB – Absa

  1,084  1,062

Barclays Capital

  95  147

Barclays Global Investors

  1,496  1,261

Barclays Wealth

  391  393

Goodwill

  7,625  7,014

Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently when there are indicationsindicators that impairment may have occurred, by comparing the carrying value to its recoverable amount.

Impairment testing of goodwill

The recoverable amount of each operation’s goodwill is based on value-in-use or fair value less costs to sell calculations. The calculation iscalculations are based upon discounting expected pre-tax cash flows at a risk adjusted interest rate appropriate to the cash generating unit, the determination of both of which requires the exercise of judgement. The estimation of pre-tax cash flows is sensitive to the periods for which forecasts are available and to assumptions regarding the long-term sustainable cash flows. While forecasts are compared with actual performance and external economic data, expected cash flows naturally reflect management’s view of future performance.

At 31st December 2007,2008, the goodwill allocated to UK Retail Banking of £3,131m (2006: £3,132m) includedwas £3,139m (2007: £3,138m) including £3,130m (2006:(2007: £3,130m) relating to Woolwich, the goodwill allocated to GRCB – Absa was £1,084m (2007: £1,062m) and the amountgoodwill allocated to International Retail and Commercial Banking of £1,682m (2006: £1,481m) included £1,054m (2006: £953m) relating to Absa.

Barclays Global Investors was £1,496m (2007: £1,261m). The remaining aggregate of goodwill of £2,830m (2006: £2,009m) comprised£1,915m (2007: £1,561m) consists of balances relating to multiple business operations which are not considered individually significant.

Goodwill impairment of £111m (2007: £nil) reflects the full write-down of £74m relating to EquiFirst, a US non-prime mortgage originator and a partial write-down of £37m relating to FirstPlus following its closure to new business in August 2008.

Key assumptions used in value in use calculationsimpairment testing for significant goodwill

The values assigned to key assumptions reflect past experience and management judgement. UK Retail Banking

The recoverable amount of UK Retail Banking has been determined based on a value in use calculation. The calculation uses cash flow projections based on financial budgets approved by management covering a three year period, and a discount rate of 17.48%. For the purposes of the calculations, performedcash flows beyond that period have been extrapolated using a steady 3% growth rate. The growth rate does not exceed the long-term average growth rate for the significant amounts of goodwill are sensitive to changesmarket in which UK Retail Banking operates. Management believes that any reasonable possible change in the following key assumptions:assumptions on which UK Retail Banking’s recoverable amount is based would not cause its carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount.

TermGlobal Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa

The recoverable amount of GRCB – Absa has been determined based on a value in use calculation. The calculation uses cash flow forecasts and growth rates

Cash flows areprojections based on internalfinancial budgets approved by management information forcovering a three year period, and a discount rate of up to three years, after which a growth factor suitable for14.10%. For the business is applied. Growth rates are based onpurposes of the projected local inflation rates over the term of estimated cash flows.

The business operation containing Woolwich has applied a growth factor of 2% (proxy for inflation) tocalculations, cash flows for thebeyond that period 2011 to 2016. Absa has appliedhave been extrapolated using a growth rate of 8% to cash flows for the threetwo years 20112012 to 2013, and a rate of 4%6% for the ten years 2014 to 2021.2023. The use of longer cash flow projections is justified bygrowth rate does not exceed the long-term nature of these businesses withinaverage growth rate for the Barclays Group.

Discount rates

The business operation containing Woolwich has applied a discount factor of 15%, andmarket in which GRCB – Absa has applied 13.62% to forecast cash flows used in the impairment testing.

operates. Management believes that any reasonable changespossible change in the key assumptions usedon which GRCB – Absa’s recoverable amount is based would not cause its carrying amount to determineexceed its recoverable amount.

Barclays Global Investors

The recoverable amount of BGI has been determined based on a fair value methodology approach which includes both a discounted cash flow valuation and comparable company valuation multiples based on revenue, EBITDA and assets under management. The calculation uses earnings projections based on financial budgets approved by management covering a three year period and a discount rate of 11.5%. For the purposes of the calculations, cash flows beyond that period have been extrapolated using growth rates of between 2% and 11% for cash flows from 2012 to 2017, and a terminal growth factor of 4% for 2018 and beyond. The growth rate does not exceed the long-term average growth rate for the market in which BGI operates. Management believes that any reasonable possible change in the key assumptions on which BGI’s recoverable amounts of Absa and Woolwich goodwill willamount is based would not result in impairment.

No impairment was identified in 2007 or 2006.cause its carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount.

 

179208 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

LOGO

22 Intangible assets

 

  2008 
  Internally
generated
software
£m
 Other
software
£m
 Core
deposit
intangibles
£m
 Brands
£m
 

Customer
lists

£m

 

Mortgage
servicing
rights

£m

 

Licences
and other

£m

 

Total

£m

 

Cost

         

At 1st January 2008

  388  188  244  149  524  126  161  1,780 

Acquisitions

    127  17  6  992    210  1,352 

Additions/disposals

  274  5          3  282 

Exchange and other adjustments

  59  8      49  47  52  215 

At 31st December 2008

  721  328  261  155  1,565  173  426  3,629 

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

         

At 1st January 2008

  (163) (57) (37) (38) (101) (64) (38) (498)

Disposals

  11  7            18 

Amortisation charge

  (86) (33) (14) (15) (62) (22) (59) (291)

Impairment release

  3              3 

Exchange and other adjustments

  (49) 14  (1) (2) (9) (30) (7) (84)

At 31st December 2008

  (284) (69) (52) (55) (172) (116) (104) (852)

Net book value

  437  259  209  100  1,393  57  322  2,777 
  2007 
  

 

2007

   Internally
generated
software
£m
 Other
software
£m
 Core
deposit
intangibles
£m
 Brands
£m
 

Customer
lists

£m

 

Mortgage
servicing
rights

£m

 Licences
and other
£m
 Total
£m
 
  Internally
generated
software
£m
 
 
 
 
 Other
software
£m
 
 
 
 Core
deposit
intangibles
£m
 
 
 
 
 Brands
£m
 
 
 Customer
lists
£m
 
 
 
 Mortgage
servicing
rights
£m
 
 
 
 
 Licences
and other
£m
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 

Cost

                  

At 1st January 2007

  267  123  242  145  467  122  140  1,506   267  123  242  145  467  122  140  1,506 

Acquisitions

          54    23  77           54    23  77 

Additions

  118  56    3    4    181   118  56    3    4    181 

Exchange and other adjustments

  3  9  2  1  3    (2) 16   3  9  2  1  3    (2)  16 

At 31st December 2007

  388  188  244  149  524  126  161  1,780   388  188  244  149  524  126  161  1,780 

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

                  

At 1st January 2007

  (116) (29) (24) (22) (64) (10) (26) (291)  (116) (29) (24) (22) (64) (10) (26) (291)

Amortisation charge

  (45) (13) (11) (15) (36) (54) (12) (186)  (45) (13) (11) (15) (36) (54) (12) (186)

Impairment charge

    (14)           (14)    (14)           (14)

Exchange and other adjustments

  (2) (1) (2) (1) (1)     (7)  (2) (1) (2) (1) (1)     (7)

At 31st December 2007

  (163) (57) (37) (38) (101) (64) (38) (498)  (163) (57) (37) (38) (101) (64) (38) (498)

Net book value

  225  131  207  111  423  62  123  1,282   225  131  207  111  423  62  123  1,282 
         
  

2006

 

 
  Internally
generated

software
£m

 
 

 
 

 Other
software
£m
 
 
 
 Core
deposit
intangibles
£m
 
 
 
 
 Brands
£m
 
 
 Customer
lists
£m
 
 
 
 Mortgage
servicing
rights
£m
 
 
 
 
 Licences
and other
£m
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 

Cost

         

At 1st January 2006

  188  43  306  183  582    139  1,441 

Acquisitions

            114  2  116 

Additions

  95  86        16  13  210 

Exchange and other adjustments

  (16) (6) (64) (38) (115) (8) (14) (261)

At 31st December 2006

  267  123  242  145  467  122  140  1,506 

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

         

At 1st January 2006

  (90) (18) (7) (9) (29)   (19) (172)

Amortisation charge

  (29) (7) (20) (16) (44) (11) (9) (136)

Impairment charge

  (2) (5)           (7)

Exchange and other adjustments

  5  1  3  3  9  1  2  24 

At 31st December 2006

  (116) (29) (24) (22) (64) (10) (26) (291)

Net book value

  151  94  218  123  403  112  114  1,215 

Impairment charges reflect theThe impairment of certain IT assets where the future economic benefit did not exceed the carrying value.

Impairment chargesrelease detailed above havehas been included within other operating expenses.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 180
 209


LOGONotes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

23 Property, plant and equipment

 

  2007 2006   2008 2007 
  Property
£m
 
 
 Equipment
£m
 
 
 Operating
leased
assets
£m
 
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 
 Property
£m
 
 
 Equipment
£m
 
 
 Operating
leased
assets
£m
 
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 
  Property
£m
 Equipment
£m
 Operating
leased
assets
£m
 Total
£m
 Property
£m
 Equipment
£m
 Operating
leased
assets
£m
 Total
£m
 

Cost

                  

At 1st January

  2,154  2,429  365  4,948  2,450  2,541  365  5,356   2,451  2,995  413  5,859  2,154  2,429  365  4,948 

Acquisitions and disposals

  5  13    18           992  218    1,210  5  13    18 

Additions

  506  638  105  1,249  180  475    655   493  846  126  1,465  506  638  105  1,249 

Disposals

  (241) (112) (57) (410) (422) (382)   (804)  (485) (276) (235) (996) (241) (112) (57) (410)

Fully depreciated assets written off

  (1) (8)   (9) (1) (89)   (90)  (15) (7)   (22) (1) (8)   (9)

Exchange and other adjustments

  28  35    63  (53) (116)   (169)  188  168    356  28  35    63 

At 31st December

  2,451  2,995  413  5,859  2,154  2,429  365  4,948   3,624  3,944  304  7,872  2,451  2,995  413  5,859 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment

                  

At 1st January

  (993) (1,454) (9) (2,456) (1,022) (1,575) (5) (2,602)  (1,044) (1,804) (15) (2,863) (993) (1,454) (9) (2,456)

Acquisitions and disposals

  (1) (7)   (8)          (8) (12)   (20) (1) (7)   (8)

Depreciation charge

  (91) (370) (6) (467) (118) (335) (2) (455)  (124) (475) (31) (630) (91) (370) (6) (467)

Impairment charge

  (2)     (2) (14)     (14)    (33)   (33) (2)     (2)

Disposals

  58  37    95  148  341    489   168  185  3  356  58  37    95 

Fully depreciated assets written off

  1  8    9  1  89    90   15  7    22  1  8    9 

Exchange and other adjustments

  (16) (18)   (34) 12  26  (2) 36   (18) (12)   (30) (16) (18)   (34)

At 31st December

  (1,044) (1,804) (15) (2,863) (993) (1,454) (9) (2,456)  (1,011) (2,144) (43) (3,198) (1,044) (1,804) (15) (2,863)

Net book value

  1,407  1,191  398  2,996  1,161  975  356  2,492   2,613  1,800  261  4,674  1,407  1,191  398  2,996 

Operating leased assets represent assets such as plant and equipment leased to customers under operating leases.

Certain of the Group’s equipment is held on finance leases. See Note 37.

In 2007 the value of an existing office building in the UK property portfolio was impaired by £2m reflecting local market conditions that had prevented its disposal in the year. In 2008 the freehold of the building will be disposed of by a short- or long-term leaseback. Consequently the value has been written down to fair value, less cost of sale.

210

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

24 Financial liabilities designated at fair value

 

  2007  2006  2008  2007
  Fair value
£m
  Contractual
amount due
on maturity
£m
  Fair value
£m
  Contractual
amount due
on maturity
£m
  Fair value
£m
  Contractual
amount
due on
maturity
£m
  Fair value
£m
  Contractual
amount
due on
maturity
£m

Debt securities

  52,320  62,167  32,261  37,393  61,297  69,197  52,320  62,167

Deposits

  17,319  18,140  19,990  20,465  10,518  10,109  17,319  18,140

Other

  4,850  6,239  1,736  2,913  5,077  6,761  4,850  6,239

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  74,489  86,546  53,987  60,771  76,892  86,067  74,489  86,546

At 31st December 2008, the own credit adjustment arose from the fair valuation of £54.5bn of Barclays Capital structured notes (2007: £40.7bn). The amountwidening of changeBarclays credit spreads in the year affected the fair value of financial liabilities attributable to changesthese notes and as a result revaluation gains of £1,663m were recognised in own credit risk of these liabilities in 2007 is £658m.

There were no significant gains or losses attributable to changes in own credit risk for financial liabilities in 2006.trading income (2007: £658m).

25 Other liabilities

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Accruals and deferred income

  6,075  6,127  6,495  6,075

Sundry creditors

  4,341  4,118  6,049  4,341

Obligations under finance leases (Note 37)

  83  92  96  83

Other liabilities

  10,499  10,337  12,640  10,499

Included in the above are balances of £9,043m (2006: £9,265m)£11,068m (2007: £9,043m) expected to be settled within no more than 12 months after the balance sheet date; and balances of £1,456m (2006: £1,072m)£1,572m (2007: £1,456m) expected to be settled more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Accruals and deferred income included £102m (2006: £107m)£nil (2007: £102m) in relation to deferred income from investment contracts and £677m (2006: £822m)£nil (2007: £677m) in relation to deferred income from insurance contracts.

 

181 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 211


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

26 Insurance assets and liabilities

Insurance assets

Reinsurance assets are £157m (2006: £172m)£123m (2007: £157m) and relate principally to the Group’s long-term business. Reinsurers’ share of provisions relating to the Group’s short-term business are £94m (2006: £82m)£32m (2007: £94m). The reinsurance assets expected to be recovered after more than one year are £63m (2006: £92m)£91m (2007: £63m).

Insurance contract liabilities including unit-linked liabilities

Insurance liabilities comprise the following:

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Insurance contract liabilities:

        

– linked liabilities

  1,398  1,591  125  1,398

– non-linked liabilities

  2,347  2,121  1,908  2,347

Provision for claims

  158  166  119  158

Insurance contract liabilities including unit-linked liabilities

  3,903  3,878  2,152  3,903

Insurance contract liabilities relate principally to the Group’s long-term business. Insurance contract liabilities associated with the Group’s short-term non-life business are £174m (2006: £198m)£73m (2007: £174m).

Movements in insurance liabilities and reinsurance assets

Movements in insurance assets and insurance contract liabilities were as follows:

 

  2008 2007
  2007  2006  Gross
£m
 Reinsurance
£m
 Net
£m
 Gross
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 Net
£m
  Gross
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 Net
£m
  Gross
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 Net
£m

At beginning of year

  3,878  (172) 3,706  3,767  (114) 3,653  3,903  (157) 3,746  3,878  (172) 3,706

Change in year

  25  15  40  111  (58) 53  (1,751) 34  (1,717) 25  15  40

At end of year

  3,903  (157) 3,746  3,878  (172) 3,706  2,152  (123) 2,029  3,903  (157) 3,746

Assumptions used to measure insurance liabilities

The assumptions that have the greatest effect on the measurement of the amounts recognised above, and the processes used to determine them were as follows:

Long-term business – linked and non-linked

Mortality – mortality estimates are based on standard industry and national mortality tables, adjusted where appropriate to reflect the Group’s own experience. A margin is added to ensure prudence – for example, future mortality improvements for annuity business.

Renewal expenses level and inflation – expense reserves are a small part of overall insurance liabilities, however, increases in expenses caused by unanticipated inflation or other unforeseen factors could lead to expense reserve increases. Expenses are therefore set using prudent assumptions. Initial renewal expense levels are set by considering expense forecasts for the business and, where appropriate, building in a margin to allow for the increasing burden of fixed costs on the UK closed life book of business. The inflation assumption is set by adding a margin to the market rate of inflation implied by index-linked gilt yields.

Short-term business

Short-term business – for single premium policies the proportion of unearned premiums is calculated based on estimates of the frequency and severity of incidents.

Changes in assumptions

There have been no changes in assumptions in 20072008 that have had a material effect on the financial statements.

Uncertainties associated with cash flows related to insurance contracts and risk management activities

Long-term insurance contracts (linked and non-linked)

For long-term insurance contracts where death is the insured risk, the most significant factors that could detrimentally affect the frequency and severity of claims are the incidence of disease, such as AIDS, or general changes in lifestyle, such as in eating, exercise and smoking. Where survival is the insured risk, advances in medical care and social conditions are the key factors that increase longevity.

The Group manages its exposure to risk by operating in part as a unit-linked business, prudent product design, applying strict underwriting criteria, transferring risk to reinsurers, managing claims and establishing prudent reserves.

Short-term insurance contracts

For payment protection contracts where inability to make payments under a loan contract is the insured risk, the most significant factors are the health of the policyholder and the possibility of unemployment which depends upon, among other things, long-term and short-term economic factors. The Group manages its exposure to such risks through prudent product design, efficient claims management, prudent reserving methodologies and bases, regular product, economic and market reviews and regular adequacy tests on the size of the reserves.

Absa insures property and motor vehicles, for which the most significant factors that could effect the frequency and severity of claims are climatic change and crime. Absa manages its exposure to risk by diversifying insurance risks accepted and transferring risk to reinsurers.

 

212

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

182


LOGO

LOGO

26 Insurance assets and liabilities (continued)

Sensitivity analysis

The following table presents the sensitivity of the level of insurance contract liabilities disclosed in this note to movements in the actuarial assumptions used to calculate them. The percentage change in variable is applied to a range of existing actuarial modelling assumptions to derive the possible impact on net profit after tax. The disclosure is not intended to explain the impact of a percentage change in the insurance assets and liabilities disclosed above.

 

  2008  2007
  2007  2006  Change in
variable
%
  Net profit
after tax
impact
£m
  Change in
variable
%
  Net profit
after tax
impact
£m
  Change in
variable
%
  Net profit
after tax
impact
£m
  Change in
variable
%
  Net profit
after tax
impact
£m

Long-term insurance contracts:

                

Improving mortality (annuitants only)

  10  21  10  23  10  1  10  21

Worsening of mortality (assured lives only)

  10  29  10  25  10  20  10  29

Worsening of base renewal expense level

  20  43  20  23  20  19  20  43

Worsening of expense inflation rate

  10  10  10  9  10  1  10  10

Short-term insurance contracts:

                

Worsening of claim expense assumptions

  10  3  10  9  10  3  10  3

Any change in net profit after tax would result in a corresponding increase or decrease in shareholders’ equity.

The above analyses are based on a change in a single assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice this is unlikely to occur.

Options and guarantees

The Group’s contracts do not contain options or guarantees that could confer material risk.

Concentration of insurance risk

The Group considers that the concentration of insurance risk that is most relevant to the Group financial statements is according to the type of cover offered and the location of insured risk. The following table shows the maximum amounts payable under all of the Group’s insurance products. It ignores the probability of insured events occurring and the contribution from investments backing the insurance policies. The table shows the broad product types and the location of the insured risk, before and after the impact of reinsurance that represents the risk that is passed to other insurers.

 

 2007 2006  2008  2007
 Before

Reinsurance

£m

 Reinsurance
£m
 
 
 After

Reinsurance

£m

 Before

Reinsurance

£m

 Reinsurance

£m

 

 

 After

Reinsurance

£m

  Before
Reinsurance
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 After
Reinsurance
£m
  Before
Reinsurance
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 After
Reinsurance
£m

Total benefits insured by product type

                

Long-term insurance contracts

 31,205 (10,497) 20,708 24,934 (9,445) 15,489  19,193  (3,591) 15,602  31,205  (10,497) 20,708

Short-term insurance contracts

 31,464 (1,139) 30,325 39,870 (901) 38,969  36,228  (2,735) 33,493  31,464  (1,139) 30,325

Total benefits insured

 62,669 (11,636) 51,033 64,804 (10,346) 54,458  55,421  (6,326) 49,095  62,669  (11,636) 51,033
      
 2007 2006  2008  2007
 Before
Reinsurance
£m
 Reinsurance
£m
 
 
 After
Reinsurance
£m
 Before
Reinsurance
£m
 Reinsurance
£m
 
 
 After
Reinsurance
£m
  Before
Reinsurance
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 After
Reinsurance
£m
  Before
Reinsurance
£m
  Reinsurance
£m
 

After

Reinsurance
£m

Total benefits insured by geographic location

                

United Kingdom

 22,538 (7,473) 15,065 25,403 (8,010) 17,393  8,120  (525) 7,595  22,538  (7,473) 15,065

Other European Union

 4,304 (2,479) 1,825 3,317 (1,802) 1,515  6,519  (2,305) 4,214  4,304  (2,479) 1,825

Africa

 35,827 (1,684) 34,143 36,084 (534) 35,550  40,782  (3,496) 37,286  35,827  (1,684) 34,143

Total benefits insured

 62,669 (11,636) 51,033 64,804 (10,346) 54,458  55,421  (6,326) 49,095  62,669  (11,636) 51,033

Reinsurer credit risk

For the long-term business, reinsurance programmes are in place to restrict the amount of cover toon any single life. The reinsurance cover is spread across highly rated companies to diversify the risk of reinsurer solvency. Net insurance reserves include a margin to reflect reinsurer credit risk.

 

183 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 213


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

27 Subordinated liabilities

Subordinated liabilities comprise dated and undated loan capital as follows:

 

   2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Undated loan capital

  (a) 6,631  5,422

Undated lo an capital

  (a)  13,673  6,631

Dated loan capital

  (b) 11,519  8,364  (b)  16,169  11,519
     29,842  18,150
   18,150  13,786

(a) Undated loan capital

           
  Notes  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  Notes  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Non-convertible

           

The Bank

           

6% Callable Perpetual Core Tier One Notes

  a,p  392  404  a,q  487  392

6.86% Callable Perpetual Core Tier One Notes (US$1,000m)

  a,p  624  571  a,q  1,118  624

5.3304% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments

  b,q  520  501  b,r  652  520

5.926% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments (US$1,350m)

  c,r  708  690  c,s  1,109  708

6.3688% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments

  n,ad  526    n,ae  600  526

7.434% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments (US$1,250m)

  o,ae  660    o,af  1,055  660

14% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments

  e,t  2,514  

Junior Undated Floating Rate Notes (US$121m)

  d,s  61  62  d,u  83  61

7.7% Undated Subordinated Notes (US$2,000m)

  p,ah  1,644  

Undated Floating Rate Primary Capital Notes Series 3

  d,t  147  146  d,v  147  147

9.875% Undated Subordinated Notes

  e,u  319  319      319

9.25% Perpetual Subordinated Bonds (ex-Woolwich plc)

  f,v  171  178  f, w  232  171

9% Permanent Interest Bearing Capital Bonds

  g,w  102  102  g,x  120  102

8.25% Undated Subordinated Notes

  p,ag  1,092  

7.125% Undated Subordinated Notes

  h,x  535  550  h,y  620  535

6.875% Undated Subordinated Notes

  i,y  657  656  i, z  729  657

6.375% Undated Subordinated Notes

  j,z  482  481  j, aa  526  482

6.125% Undated Subordinated Notes

  k,aa  560  571  k,ab  666  560

6.5% Undated Subordinated Notes (FFr 1,000m)

  l,ab  115  105

6.5% Undated Subordinated Notes (FFr1,000m)

  l,ac  151  115

5.03% Reverse Dual Currency Undated Subordinated Loan (Yen 8,000m)

  m,ac  21  34  m,ad  51  21

5% Reverse Dual Currency Undated Subordinated Loan (Yen 12,000m)

  m,ac  31  52

Undated loan capital – non-convertible

   6,631  5,422

5% Reverse Dual Currency Undated Subordinated Loan (Yen12,000m)

  m,ad  77  31

Undated lo an capital – non-convertible

     13,673  6,631

Security and subordination

None of the undated loan capital of the Bank is secured.

The Junior Undated Floating Rate Notes (the ‘Junior Notes’) rank behind the claims against the Bank of depositors and other unsecured unsubordinated creditors and holders of dated loan capital.

All other issues of the Bank’s undated loan capital rank pari passu with each other and behind the claims of the holders of the Junior Notes, except for the 6% and 6.86% Callable Perpetual Core Tier One Notes (the ‘TONs’) and the 5.3304%, 5.926%, 6.3688%, 7.434% and 7.434%14% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments (the ‘RCIs’) (such issues, excluding the TONs and the RCIs, being the ‘Undated Notes and Loans’).

The TONs and the RCIs rank pari passu with each other and behind the claims of the holders of the Undated Notes and Loans.

Interest

Notes

aThese TONs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2032. After that date, in the event that the TONs are not redeemed, the TONs will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

bThese RCIs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2036. After that date, in the event that the RCIs are not redeemed, the RCIs will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

cThese RCIs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2016. After that date, in the event that the RCIs are not redeemed, the RCIs will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

dThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

eThese NotesRCIs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2008.2019. After that date, in the event that the NotesRCIs are not redeemed, the couponRCIs will be reset to abear interest at rates fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

fThese Bonds bear a fixed rate of interest until 2021. After that date, in the event that the Bonds are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

gThe interest rate on these Bonds is fixed for the life of this issue.

 

hThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2020. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

iThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2015. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

214

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

184


LOGO

LOGO

27 Subordinated liabilities (continued)

 

jThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2017. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

kThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2027. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

lThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2009. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on European interbank rates.

 

mThese Loans bear a fixed rate of interest until 2028 based on a US Dollar principal amount, but the interest payments have been swapped, resulting in a Yen interest rate payable, which is fixed periodically in advance based on London interbank rates. After that date, in the event that the Loans are not redeemed, the Loans will bear Yen interest rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

nThese RCIs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2019. After that date, in the event that the RCIs are not redeemed, the RCIs will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

 

oThese RCIs bear a fixed rate of interest until 2017. After that date, in the event that the RCIs are not redeemed, the RCIs will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

pThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2018. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates.

The Bank is not obliged to make a payment of interest on its Undated Notes and Loans excluding the 9.25% Perpetual Subordinated Bonds, 7.7% Undated Subordinated Notes and 8.25% Undated Subordinated Notes if, in the preceding six months, a dividend has not been declared or paid on any class of shares of Barclays PLC or, in certain cases, any class of preference shares of the Bank. The Bank is not obliged to make a payment of interest on its 9.25% Perpetual Subordinated Bonds if, in the immediately preceding 12 months interest period, a dividend has not been paid on any class of its share capital. Interest not so paid becomes payable in each case if such a dividend is subsequently paid or in certain other circumstances. During the year, the Bank declared and paid dividends on its ordinary shares and on all classes of preference shares.

No payment of principal or any interest may be made unless the Bank satisfies a specified solvency test.

The Bank may elect to defer any payment of interest on the 7.7% Undated Subordinated Notes and 8.25% Undated Subordinated Notes. Until such time as any deferred interest has been paid in full, neither the Bank nor Barclays PLC may declare or pay a dividend, subject to certain exceptions, on any of its ordinary shares, preference shares, or other share capital or satisfy any payments of interest or coupons on certain other junior obligations.

The Bank may elect to defer any payment of interest on the RCIs (b, c, e, n and o above). Any such deferred payment of interest must be paid on the earlier of (i) the date of redemption of the RCIs, and (ii) the coupon payment date falling on or nearest to the tenth anniversary of the date of deferral of such payment.payment, and (iii) in respect of e above only, substitution. Whilst such deferral is continuing, neither the Bank nor Barclays PLC may declare or pay a dividend, subject to certain exceptions, on any of its ordinary shares or Preference Shares.preference shares.

The Bank may elect to defer any payment of interest on the TONs if it determines that it is, or such payment would result in it being, in non-compliance with capital adequacy requirements and policies of the FSA. Any such deferred payment of interest will only be payable on a redemption of the TONs. Until such time as the Bank next makes a payment of interest on the TONs, neither the Bank nor Barclays PLC may (i) declare or pay a dividend, subject to certain exceptions, on any of their respective ordinary shares or Preference Shares, or make payments of interest in respect of the Bank’s Reserve Capital Instruments and (ii) certain restrictions on the redemption, purchase or reduction of their respective share capital and certain other securities also apply.

Repayment

Notes

pqThese TONs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after June 2032.

 

qrThese RCIs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2036.

 

rsThese RCIs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2016.

 

stThese RCIs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after June 2019.

uThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole or in part on any interest payment date.

 

tvThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any interest payment date.

 

uThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2008, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

vwThese Bonds are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2021, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

wxThese Bonds are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole at any time.

 

xyThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2020, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

yzThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2015, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

zaaThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2017, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

aaabThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2027, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

abacThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2009, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

 

acadThese Loans are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole in 2028, or on any fifth anniversary thereafter.

ad These RCIs are repayable at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2019.

aeThese RCIs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2019.

ae These RCIs are repayable at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2017.

afThese RCIs are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after December 2017.

agThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any interest payment date falling in or after December 2018.

ahThese Notes are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any interest payment date falling in or after April 2018.

In addition, each issue of undated loan capital is repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole for certain tax reasons, either at any time, or on an interest payment date. There are no events of default except non-payment of principal or mandatory interest.

Any repayments require the prior notification to the FSA.

All issues of undated loan capital have been made in the eurocurrency market and/or under Rule 144A, and no issues have been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933.

 

185 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 215


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

27 Subordinated liabilities(continued)

(b) Dated loan capital

Dated loan capital, issued by the Bank for the development and expansion of the Group’s business and to strengthen its capital base, by Barclays Bank Spain SA (Barclays Spain), Barclays Bank of Botswana Ltd (BBB), Barclays Bank Zambia PLC (Barclays Zambia) and Barclays Bank of Kenya (Barclays Kenya) to enhance their respective capital bases and by Absa and Barclays Bank of Ghana Ltd (BBG) for general corporate purposes, comprise:

 

  Notes    2007

£m

    2006

£m

  Notes  2008
£m
  2007
£m
Non-convertible                
The Bank                

7.4% Subordinated Notes 2009 (US$400m)

  a    200    204  a  275  200

Subordinated Fixed to CMS-Linked Notes 2009 (31m)

  b    23    21  b  31  23

12% Unsecured Capital Loan Stock 2010

  a    27    27  a  27  27

5.75% Subordinated Notes 2011 (1,000m)

  a    724    676  a  943  724

5.25% Subordinated Notes 2011 (250m) (ex-Woolwich plc)

  a    200    186  a  260  200

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2012

          301

Callable Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2012

          44

Step-up Callable Floating Rate Subordinated Bonds 2012 (ex-Woolwich plc)

          151

Callable Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2012 (US$150m)

          77

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2012 (US$100m)

          51

Capped Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2012 (US$100m)

          51

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2013 (US$1,000m)

  b,n    501    513      501

5.015% Subordinated Notes 2013 (US $ 150m)

  a    77    77

5.015% Subordinated Notes 2013 (US$150m)

  a  112  77

4.875% Subordinated Notes 2013 (750m)

  a    583    540  a  750  583

5.5% Subordinated Notes 2013 (DM 500m)

  d,n    196    179      196

Floating Rate Subordinated Step-up Callable Notes 2013 (Yen 5,500m)

  b,n    25    24      25

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2013 (AU$150m)

  c,n    67    61      67

5.93% Subordinated Notes 2013 (AU $100m)

  e,n    44    41

5.93% Subordinated Notes 2013 (AU$100m)

      44

Callable Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2015 (US$1,500m)

  b,n    753    767  b,k  1,031  753

4.38% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes 2015 (US$75m)

  a    30    37  a  88  30

4.75% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes 2015 (US$150m)

  a    85    76  a  81  85

Floating Rate Subordinated Step-up Callable Notes 2016 (US$750m)

  b,n    375    382  b,k  514  375

Callable Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2016 (1,250m)

  b,n    927    844  b,k  1,211  927

Callable Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2017 (US$500m)

  b,n    250    255  b,k  343  250

10.125% Subordinated Notes 2017 (ex-Woolwich plc)

  k,n    111    113  h,k  109  111

Floating Rate Subordinated Step-up Callable Notes 2017 (US$1,500m)

  b,n    749      b,k  1,029  749

Floating Rate Subordinated Step-up Callable Notes 2017 (1,500m)

  b,n    1,106      b,k  1,444  1,106

6.05% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes 2017 (US$2,250m)

  a    1,125      a  1,856  1,125

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2018 (40m)

  b    29    27  b  38  29

6% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes due 2018 (1,750m)

  a  1,767  

CMS-Linked Subordinated Notes due 2018 (100m)

  b  100  

CMS-Linked Subordinated Notes due 2018 (135m)

  b  135  

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2019 (50m)

  b    36    32  b  47  36

Callable Fixed/Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2019 (1,000m)

  l    761    696  i  984  761

9.5% Subordinated Bonds 2021 (ex-Woolwich plc)

  a    282    290  a  298  282

Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2021 (100m)

  b    72    66  b  94  72

Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2022 (50m)

  b    37    34  b  49  37

Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2023 (50m)

  b    37    34  b  48  37

Fixed/Floating Rate Subordinated Callable Notes 2023

  r,n    505      o,k  571  505

5.75% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes 2026

  a    600    608  a  690  600

5.4% Reverse Dual Currency Subordinated Loan 2027 (Yen 15,000m)

  m    71    66  j  128  71

6.33% Subordinated Notes 2032

  a    49    50  a  53  49

Subordinated Floating Rate Notes 2040 (100m)

  b    73    67  b  96  73

Barclays Bank SA, Spain (Barclays Spain)

                
Subordinated Floating Rate Capital Notes 2011 (30m)  b    10    22

Subordinated Floating Rate Capital Notes 2011 (11m)

  b  11  10

Absa

                
14.25% Subordinated Callable Notes 2014 (ZAR 3,100m)  f,n    253    269  c,k  240  253

10.75% Subordinated Callable Notes 2015 (ZAR 1,100m)

  g,n    87    89  d,k  85  87

Subordinated Callable Notes 2015 (ZAR 400m)

  h,n    29    29  e,k  30  29

8.75% Subordinated Callable Notes 2017 (ZAR 1,500m)

  i,n    111    113  f,k  115  111

Subordinated Callable Notes 2018 (ZAR 3,700m)

  e,k  144  

8.8% Subordinated Fixed Rate Callable Notes 2019 (ZAR 1,725m)

  s,n    123      p,k  146  123

8.1% Subordinated Callable Notes 2020 (ZAR 2,000m)

  j,n    138    143  g,k  130  138
Barclays Bank of Ghana Ltd (BBG)                

14% Fixed Rate BBG Subordinated Callable Notes 2016 (GHC 100,000m)

  a,n    5    6  a,k  5  5

Barclays Bank of Kenya (Barclays Kenya)

                

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2014 (KES 1,000m)

  t    8    

Floating Rate Subordinated Notes 2014 (KES 2,965m)

  q  26  8

Dated loan capital – non-convertible

       11,494    8,339     16,134  11,494

 

216

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

186


LOGO

LOGO

27 Subordinated liabilities (continued)

 

  Notes  2007

£m

  2006

£m

  Notes  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Convertible

            
Barclays Bank of Botswana (BBB)            

Subordinated Unsecured Floating Rate Capital Notes 2014 (BWP 100m)

  n,o  8  9

Subordinated Unsecured Floating Rate Capital Notes 2014 (BWP 190m)

  k,l  17  8
Barclays Bank Zambia PLC (Barclays Zambia)            

Subordinated Unsecured Floating Rate Capital Notes 2015 (ZMK 40,000m)

  n,p  6  5

Subordinated Unsecured Floating Rate Capital Notes 2015 (ZMK 49,086m)

  k,m  7  6
Absa            

Redeemable cumulative option-holding preference shares (ZAR 147m)

  q  11  11  n  11  11
Total convertible     25  25     35  25

None of the Group’s dated loan capital is secured. The debt obligations of the Bank, Barclays Spain, BBG, BBB, Barclays Zambia, Barclays Kenya and Absa rank ahead of the interests of holders of their equity. Dated loan capital of the Bank, Barclays Spain, BBG, BBB, Barclays Zambia, Barclays Kenya and Absa has been issued on the basis that the claims there under are subordinated to the respective claims of their depositors and other unsecured unsubordinated creditors.

Interest

Notes

aThe interest rates on these Notes are fixed for the life of those issues.

 

bThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on London or European interbank rates.

 

cThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Sydney Bill of exchange rates.

dThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2008. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on London interbank rates.

eThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2008. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Sydney Bill of exchange rates.

fThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2009. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference rate for a further period of five years.

 

gdThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2010. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Johannesburg interbank acceptance rates.

 

heThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Johannesburg interbank acceptance rates.

 

ifThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2012. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Johannesburg interbank acceptance rates.

 

jgThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2015. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Johannesburg interbank acceptance rates.

 

khThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2012. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the coupon will be reset to a fixed margin over a reference gilt rate for a further period of five years.

 

liThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2014. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on European interbank rates.

 

mjThis Loan bears a fixed rate of interest based on a US Dollar principal amount, but the interest payments have been swapped, resulting in a Yen interest rate payable which is fixed periodically in advance based on London interbank rates.

 

nkRepayable at the option of the issuer, prior to maturity, on conditions governing the respective debt obligations, some in whole or in part, and some only in whole.

 

olThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on the Bank of Botswana Certificate Rate. All of these Notes will be compulsorily converted to Preference Shares of BBB, having a total par value equal in sum to the principal amount of Notes outstanding at the time of conversion, should BBB experience pre-tax losses in excess of its retained earnings and other capital surplus accounts.

 

pmThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on the Bank of Zambia Treasury Bill rate. All of these Notes will be compulsorily converted to Preference Shares of Barclays Zambia, having a total par value equal in sum to the principal amount of Notes outstanding at the time of conversion, should Barclays Zambia experience pre-tax losses in excess of its retained earnings and other capital surplus accounts.

 

qnThe dividends are compounded and payable semi-annually in arrears on 30th September and 31st March of each year. The shares were issued by Absa Group Limited on 1st July 2004 and the redemption dates commence on the first business day after the third anniversary of the date of issue of the redeemable preference shares and ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of issue. Such exercise and notice will be deemed to be effective only on the option exercise dates, being 1st March, 1st June, 1st September or 1st December of each year. The shares are convertible into ordinary shares at the option of the preference shareholders on the redemption dates in lots of 100.

 

roThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2018. After that date in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on London interbank rates.

 

spThese Notes bear a fixed rate of interest until 2014. After that date, in the event that the Notes are not redeemed, the Notes will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on Johannesburg interbank acceptance rates.

 

tqThese Notes bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance based on the Central Bank of Kenya Treasury Bill rates.

 

187 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 217


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

27 Subordinated liabilities (continued)

The 7.4% Subordinated Notes 2009 (the ‘7.4% Notes’) issued by the Bank have been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933. All other issues of dated loan capital by the Bank, Barclays Spain, BBG, BBB, Barclays Zambia, Barclays Kenya and Absa, which were made in non-US markets, have not been so registered. With respect to the 7.4% Notes, the Bank is not obliged to make (i) a payment of interest on any interest payment date unless a dividend is paid on any class of share capital and (ii) a payment of principal until six months after the respective maturity date with respect to such Notes.

Repayment terms

Unless otherwise indicated, the Group’s dated loan capital outstanding at 31st December 20072008 is redeemable only on maturity, subject in particular cases, to provisions allowing an early redemption in the event of certain changes in tax law or, in the case of BBB and Barclays Zambia to certain changes in legislation or regulations.

Any repayments prior to maturity require in the case of the Bank, the prior notification to the FSA, in the case of BBB, the prior approval of the Bank of Botswana, in the case of Barclays Zambia, the prior approval of the Bank of Zambia, and in the case of Absa, the prior approval of the South African Registrar of Banks.

There are no committed facilities in existence at the balance sheet date which permit the refinancing of debt beyond the date of maturity.

28 Provisions

 

  Onerous

contracts

£m

 

 

 

 Redundancy

and

restructuring

£m

 

 

 

 

 Undrawn
contractually
committed
facilities and

guarantees
provided

£m

 
 
 
 

 
 

 

 Sundry

provisions

£m

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

  Onerous
contracts
£m
 

Redundancy
and

restructuring
£m

 

Undrawn
contractually
committed
facilities and
guarantees
provided

£m

 Sundry
provisions
£m
 Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2008

  64  82  475  209  830 

Acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries

  9  (9)   (1) (1)

Exchange

  2    63  15  80 

Additions

  12  269  461  102  844 

Amounts used

  (41) (213) (794) (42) (1,090)

Unused amounts reversed

    (11) (96) (25) (132)

Amortisation of discount

  4        4 

At 31st December 2008

  50  118  109  258  535 
At 1st January 2007  71  102  46  243  462   71  102  46  243  462 

Acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries

  1  (2)   74  73   1  (2)   74  73 

Exchange

      8  5  13       8  5  13 

Additions

  18  117  560  121  816   18  117  560  121  816 

Amounts used

  (25) (117) (113) (60) (315)  (25) (117) (113) (60) (315)

Unused amounts reversed

  (5) (18) (26) (174) (223)  (5) (18) (26) (174) (223)

Amortisation of discount

  4        4   4        4 
At 31st December 2007  64  82  475  209  830   64  82  475  209  830 
At 1st January 2006  79  74  55  309  517 

Exchange

  (2) 2    (16) (16)

Additions

  45  180  35  159  419 

Amounts used

  (53) (133) (9) (94) (289)

Unused amounts reversed

  (2) (21) (35) (115) (173)

Amortisation of discount

  4        4 
At 31st December 2006  71  102  46  243  462 

Provisions expected to be recovered or settled within no more than 12 months after 31st December 20072008 were £645m (2006: £388m)£333m (2007:£645m).

Sundry provisions are made with respect to commission clawbacks, warranties and litigation claims.

UndrawnThere were no undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provided includes £360m (2006: £nil) provision against undrawn facilities on ABS CDO Super Senior positions.positions (2007: £360m).

 

218

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

188


LOGO

LOGO

29 Securitisations

The Group was party to securitisation transactions involving Barclays residential mortgage loans, business loans and credit card balances. In addition, the Group acts as a conduit for commercial paper, whereby it acquires static pools of residential mortgage loans from other lending institutions for securitisation transactions.

In these transactions, the assets, or interests in the assets, or beneficial interests in the cash flows arising from the assets, are transferred to a special purpose entity, or to a trust which then transfers its beneficial interests to a special purpose entity, which then issues floating rate debt securities to third-party investors.

Securitisations may, depending on the individual arrangement result in continued recognition of the securitised assets and the recognition of the debt securities issued in the transaction; lead to partial continued recognition of the assets to the extent of the Group’s continuing involvement in those assets or to derecognition of the assets and the separate recognition, as assets or liabilities, of any rights and obligations created or retained in the transfer. Full derecognition only occurs when the Group transfers both its contractual right to receive cash flows from the financial assets, or retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to another party without material delay or reinvestment, and also transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, including credit risk, prepayment risk and interest rate risk.

The following table shows the carrying amount of securitised assets, stated at the amount of the Group’s continuing involvement where appropriate, together with the associated liabilities, for each category of asset in the balance sheet:

 

  2007 2006   2008 2007 
  Carrying
amount of
assets
£m
  Associated
liabilities
£m
 
 
 
 Carrying
amount
of assets
£m
  Associated
liabilities
£m
 
 
 
  

Carrying
amount of
assets

£m

  Associated
liabilities
£m
 Carrying
amount of
assets
£m
  Associated
liabilities
£m
 
Loans and advances to customers              

Residential mortgage loans

  16,000  (16,786) 12,577  (13,271)  12,754  (13,172) 16,000  (16,786)

Credit card receivables

  4,217  (3,895) 5,700  (5,195)  1,888  (2,109) 4,217  (3,895)

Other personal lending

  422  (485) 229  (255)  212  (256) 422  (485)

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  8,493  (8,070) 5,852  (5,303)  7,702  (8,937) 8,493  (8,070)
Total  29,132  (29,236) 24,358  (24,024)  22,556  (24,474) 29,132  (29,236)
Assets designated at fair value through profit or loss              
Retained interest in residential mortgage loans  895    628     316    895   

Retained interests in residential mortgage loans are interest only stripssecurities which represent a continuing exposure to the prepayment and credit risk in the underlying securitised assets, theassets. The total amount of whichthe loans was £23,097m (2006: £15,063m)£31,734m (2007:£23,097m). These areThe retained interest is initially recorded as an allocation of the original carrying amount based on the relative fair values of the portion derecognised and the portion retained.

 

189 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 219


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

30 Retirement benefit obligations

Pension schemes

The UK Retirement Fund (UKRF), which is the main scheme of the Group, amounting to 94%91% of all the Group’s schemes in terms of benefit obligations, comprises ten sections.

The 1964 Pension Scheme

Most employees recruited before July 1997 are members of this non-contributory defined benefit scheme. Pensions are calculated by reference to service and pensionable salary and are normally subject to a deduction from State pension age.

The Retirement Investment Scheme (RIS)

A defined contribution plan for most joiners between July 1997 and 1st October 2003. This was closed to new entrants on 1st October 2003 and the large majority of existing members of the RIS transferred toafterwork afterwork in respect of future benefit accrual with effect from 1st January 2004. There are now no longer any active members of the RIS.

The Pension Investment Plan (PIP)

A defined contribution plan created from 1st July 2001 to provide benefits for certain employees of Barclays Capital.

afterwork

Combines a contributory cash balance element with a voluntary defined contribution element. New employees since 1st October 2003 are eligible to joinafterwork. afterwork. In addition, the large majority of active members of the RIS (now closed) were transferred toafterwork afterwork in respect of future benefit accrual after 1st January 2004.

Career Average Section

The Career Average Section was established in the UKRF with effect from 1st May 2004 following the transfer of members from the Woolwich Pension Fund. The Career Average Section is a non-contributory career average scheme and was closed to new entrants on 1st December 2006.

1951 Fund Section, AP89 Section, BCPS Section, CCS Section and Mercantile Section

Five new sections were established in the UKRF with effect from 31st March 2007 following the merger of the UKRF with five smaller schemes sponsored from within the Group. All five sections are closed to new members.

The 1951 Fund Section, AP89 Section and Mercantile Section provide final salary benefits calculated by reference to service and pensionable salary.

The BCPS and CCS Sections provide defined contribution benefits. The benefits built up in these sections in relation to service before 6th April 1997 are subject to a defined benefit minimum.

In addition, the costs of ill-health retirements and death in service benefits are generally borne by the UKRF for each of the ten sections. From November 2008, members were given the option to pay member contributions by way of salary sacrifice.

Governance

The assets of the UKRF are held separately from the assets of the Group and are administered by trustees.

Barclays Pension Fund Trustees Ltd (BPFTL) acts as corporate trustee for the UKRF. BPFTL is a private limited company, incorporated on 20th December 1990, and is a subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC.

As the corporate trustee for the UKRF, BPFTL is the legal owner of the assets of the UKRF and BPFTL holds these assets in trust for the beneficiaries of the scheme.

BPFTL comprises nine Directors, of which six are Employer Directors selected by the Bank and three are Employee Directors nominated by the Pension Fund Advisory Committee (PFAC). Employee Directors are selected from those eligible active employees and pensioner members who apply to be considered for the role.

Employee Director vacancies are advertised to all eligible active and pensioner members. This enables any eligible member with an interest in becoming an Employee Director to express that interest and be considered for the role. The PFAC provides the mechanism through which Employee Directors are selected. The PFAC will accept nominations from eligible members and select from amongst all properly nominated candidates.

There are also three Alternate Employer Directors and three Alternate Employee Directors. The selection process for these appointments are as detailed above. The role of alternate directors is to provide cover for individual directors, should they not be available for meetings.

Currently, the Bank decides the funding rate after consulting with the trustees. Under the Pensions Act 2004 which has practical impact for the UKRF for the triennial valuation currently in progress with an effective date of 30th September 2007, the Bank and the trusteeTrustee must agree on the funding rate (including a recovery plan to fund any deficit against the scheme specific statutory funding objective). The first ongoing funding valuation to be completed under this legislation had an effective date of 30th September 2007.

In addition to the UKRF, there are other defined benefit and defined contribution schemes in the UK and overseas. The same approach to pensions governance applies to the other schemes in the UK but different legislation covers schemes outside of the UK where in most cases the Bank has the power to determine the funding rate.

 

220

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

190


LOGO

LOGO

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

The following tables present an analysis of defined benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for all the Group’s pension schemes and post-retirement benefits (the latter are unfunded) and present the amounts recognised in the income statement including those related to post-retirement health care.

Income statement charge

 

  2007 2006    2005 
  Pensions
£m
 
 
 Other post-
retirement
benefits
£m
  Total
£m
 
 
  Pensions
£m
 
 
 Other post-
retirement
benefits
£m
  Total
£m
 
 
 Pensions
£m
 
 
 Other post-
retirement
benefits
£m
  Total
£m
 
 
  2008 2007 2006 
  Pensions
£m
 Other post-
retirement
benefits
£m
 Total
£m
 Pensions
£m
 Other post-
retirement
benefits
£m
  Total
£m
 Pensions
£m
 

Other post-

retirement
benefits
£m

  Total
£m
 
Staff cost charge                          

Current service cost

  332  2  334   378  21  399  348  22  370   299  2  301  332  2  334  378  21  399 

Interest cost

  905  8  913   900  8  908  853  4  857   991  8  999  905  8  913  900  8  908 

Expected return on scheme assets

  (1,074)   (1,074)  (999)   (999) (898)   (898)  (1,175)   (1,175) (1,074)   (1,074) (999)   (999)

Recognised actuarial loss

  (1)   (1)  3  1  4  4    4 

Recognised actuarial (gain)/loss

  (23) (1) (24) (1)   (1) 3  1  4 

Past service cost

  20    20   29    29  13  1  14   2  (8) (6) 20    20  29    29 

Curtailment or settlements

  (32)   (32)  (29)   (29) (49)   (49)  (5)   (5) (32)   (32) (29)   (29)
Total included in staff costs  150  10  160   282  30  312  271  27  298   89  1  90  150  10  160  282  30  312 

Staff costs are included in other operating expenses.

Change in benefit obligation

 

 2007 2006 
 Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total   2008 2007 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m  UK

£m

 

 

 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m   Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total 
  

UK

£m

 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 

UK

£m

 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 
Benefit obligation at beginning of the year (17,256) (894) (97) (76) (18,323) (18,149) (938) (103) (79) (19,269)  (16,563) (913) (60) (98) (17,634) (17,256) (894) (97) (76) (18,323)

Current service cost

 (317) (15) (1) (1) (334) (358) (20) (20) (1) (399)  (276) (23)   (2) (301) (317) (15) (1) (1) (334)

Interest cost

 (869) (36) (4) (4) (913) (863) (37) (4) (4) (908)  (946) (45) (3) (5) (999) (869) (36) (4) (4) (913)

Past service cost

 (20)       (20) (4) (25)     (29)  (2) (11) 7    (6) (20)       (20)

Curtailments or settlements

 35  1      36  43  2      45   7  2      9  35  1      36 

Actuarial gain/(loss)

 1,292  25  19  1  1,337  1,566  15  11  (3) 1,589   2,807    11  (5) 2,813  1,292  25  19  1  1,337 

Contributions by plan participants

 (19) (2)     (21) (15) (2)     (17)  (20) (3)     (23) (19) (2)     (21)

Benefits paid

 589  31  2  15  637  536  40  19  4  599   598  42  2  9  651  589  31  2  15  637 

Business combinations

             11      11                      

Exchange and other adjustments

 2  (23) 21  (33) (33) (12) 60    7  55     (269)   (24) (293) 2  (23) 21  (33) (33)
Benefit obligation at end of the year (16,563) (913) (60) (98) (17,634) (17,256) (894) (97) (76) (18,323)  (14,395) (1,220) (43) (125) (15,783) (16,563) (913) (60) (98) (17,634)

The benefit obligation arises from plans that are wholly unfunded and wholly or partly funded as follows:

 

  2007
£m
 
 
  2006

£m

 

 

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

Unfunded obligations

  (248)  (237)  (297) (248)

Wholly or partly funded obligations

  (17,386)  (18,086)  (15,486) (17,386)
Total  (17,634)  (18,323)  (15,783) (17,634)

 

191 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 221


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Change in plan assets

 

 2007 2006 
 Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total Pensions Post-
retirement
benefits
 Total   2008 2007 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m  UK

£m

 

 

 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m   Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total 
  UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 

UK

£m

 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year 16,761  745      17,506  15,571  819      16,390   17,231  796      18,027  16,761  745      17,506 

Expected return on plan assets

 1,041  33      1,074  965  34      999   1,134  41      1,175  1,041  33      1,074 

Employer contribution

 355  34  2  15  406  357  26  2  4  389   336  71  2  9  418  355  34  2  15  406 

Settlements

   (1)     (1) (11) (2)     (13)    (2)     (2)   (1)     (1)

Contributions by plan participants

 19  2      21  15  2      17   20  3      23  19  2      21 

Actuarial (loss)/gain

 (332) (11)     (343) 423  25      448 

Actuarial loss

  (4,534) (121)     (4,655) (332) (11)     (343)

Benefits paid

 (589) (31) (2) (15) (637) (536) (30) (2) (4) (572)  (598) (42) (2) (9) (651) (589) (31) (2) (15) (637)

Business combinations

                                         

Exchange and other adjustments

 (24) 25      1  (23) (129)     (152)  (52) 213      161  (24) 25      1 
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year 17,231  796      18,027  16,761  745      17,506   13,537  959      14,496  17,231  796      18,027 

Amounts recognised on balance sheet

The pension and post-retirement benefit assets and liabilities recognised on the balance sheet are as follows:

 

 2007 2006 
 Pensions 

Post-

retirement
benefits

 Total Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total   2008 2007 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m  UK

£m

 

 

 Overseas
£m
 
 
 UK
£m
 
 
 Overseas
£m
 
 
 £m   Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total Pensions Post-retirement
benefits
 Total 
  

UK

£m

 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 

UK

£m

 Overseas
£m
 UK
£m
 Overseas
£m
 £m 
Benefit obligation at end of period (16,563) (913) (60) (98) (17,634) (17,256) (894) (97) (76) (18,323)  (14,395) (1,220) (43) (125) (15,783) (16,563) (913) (60) (98) (17,634)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period 17,231  796      18,027  16,761  745      17,506   13,537  959      14,496  17,231  796      18,027 

Net asset/(deficit)

 668  (117) (60) (98) 393  (495) (149) (97) (76) (817)

Net (deficit)/asset

  (858) (261) (43) (125) (1,287) 668  (117) (60) (98) 393 

Unrecognised actuarial (gains)/losses

 (1,912) 7  (3) 14  (1,894) (953) 20  17  14  (902)  (167) 150  (11) 23  (5) (1,912) 7  (3) 14  (1,894)
Net recognised liability (1,244) (110) (63) (84) (1,501) (1,448) (129) (80) (62) (1,719)  (1,025) (111) (54) (102) (1,292) (1,244) (110) (63) (84) (1,501)

Recognised assets

   36      36  53  35      88     65      65    36      36 

Recognised liability

 (1,244) (146) (63) (84) (1,537) (1,501) (164) (80) (62) (1,807)  (1,025) (176) (54) (102) (1,357) (1,244) (146) (63) (84) (1,537)
Net recognised liability (1,244) (110) (63) (84) (1,501) (1,448) (129) (80) (62) (1,719)  (1,025) (111) (54) (102) (1,292) (1,244) (110) (63) (84) (1,501)

The UKRF funded status, as measured using the IAS 19 assumptions, has moved over the yeardecreased from a £0.5bn deficit£0.7bn surplus at 31st December 20062007 to a surplusdeficit of £0.7bn£0.9bn at 31st December 2007.2008.

The assumptions used for the current year and prior year are detailed on the next page.below. Among the reasons for this change were the large loss on the assets over the year and, to a lesser extent, a strengthening of the allowance made for future improvements in mortality. Offsetting these were the increase in AA long-term corporate bond yields which resulted in a higher discount rate of 5.82%6.75% (31st December 2006: 5.12%2007: 5.82%), partially offset by lower than expected returns, and an increasea decrease in the inflation assumption to 3.45%3.16% (31st December 2006: 3.08%2007: 3.45%). A number of additional changes were made to the assumptions used in valuing the liabilities, including a decrease in the assumed rate of real salary increases to 0.5% (31st December 2006: 1%). Mortality assumptions changed from those in force at 31st December 2006.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

192


LOGO

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued) and contributions paid.

Assumptions

Obligations arising under defined benefit schemes are actuarially valued using the projected unit credit method. Under this method, where a defined benefit scheme is closed to new members, such as in the case of the 1964 Pension Scheme, the current service cost expressed as a percentage of salary is expected to increase in the future, although this higher rate will be applied to a decreasing payroll. The latest actuarial IAS valuations were carried out as at 31st December using the following assumptions:

 

    UK schemes    Overseas schemes
    2007
% p.a.
    2006
% p.a.
    2007
% p.a.
    2006
% p.a.
  UK schemes  Overseas schemes
  2008
% p.a.
  2007
% p.a.
  2008
% p.a.
  

2007

% p.a.

Discount rate

    5.82    5.12    7.51    6.94  6.75  5.82  7.09  7.51

Rate of increase in salaries

    3.95    4.08    5.60    5.66  3.66  3.95  5.93  5.60

Inflation rate

    3.45    3.08    4.13    3.94  3.16  3.45  3.98  4.13

Rate of increase for pensions in payment

    3.45    2.88    3.55    3.58  3.06  3.45  3.17  3.55

Rate of increase for pensions in deferment

    3.30    3.08    2.50    2.24  3.16  3.30  4.37  2.50

Initial health care inflation

    8.00    8.93    10.00    9.93  8.00  8.00  9.00  10.00

Long-term health care inflation

    5.00    5.00    5.01    5.00  5.00  5.00  5.01  5.01

Expected return on plan assets

    6.70    6.32    7.84    7.89  6.80  6.70  7.95  7.84

222

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Assumptions (continued)

The expected return on plan assets assumption is weighted on the basis of the fair value of these assets. Health care inflation assumptions are weighted on the basis of the health care cost for the period. All other assumptions are weighted on the basis of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the period.

The UK Schemes discount rate assumption is based on the yield on the iBoxx (over 15 year)a liability-weighted rate derived from a AA corporate bond index.yield curve.

The overseas health care inflation assumptions relate to the US and Mauritius.

Mortality assumptions

The post-retirement mortality assumptions used in valuing the liabilities of the UKRF were based on the standard 2000 series tables as published by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. These tables are considered to be most relevant to the population of the UKRF based on their mortality history. These were then adjusted in line with the actual experience of the UKRF’s own pensioners relative to the standard table. An allowance has been made for future mortality improvements based on the medium cohort projections published by the CMIB.CMIB subject to a floor of 1% pa on future improvements. On this basis the post-retirement mortality assumptions for the UKRF includes:

 

   2007  2006  2005  2004  2003
Longevity at 60 for current pensioners (years)          

– Males

  26.7  25.8  25.8  25.7  23.3

– Females

  27.9  29.5  29.5  29.4  26.4
Longevity at 60 for future pensioners currently aged 40 (years)          

– Males

  28.0  27.1  27.1  27.0  24.9

– Females

  29.1  30.7  30.6  30.6  27.9

193

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Assumptions (continued)

    2008  2007  2006  2005  2004

Longevity at 60 for current pensioners (years)

          

– Males

  27.4  26.7  25.8  25.8  25.7

– Females

  28.5  27.9  29.5  29.5  29.4

Longevity at 60 for future pensioners currently aged 40 (years)

          

– Males

  29.5  28.0  27.1  27.1  27.0

– Females

  30.5  29.1  30.7  30.6  30.6

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis for each of the principal assumptions used to measure the benefit obligation of the UKRF are as follows:

 

Impact on UKRF benefit obligation 
  Impact on UKRF benefit obligation 
  (Decrease)

/Increase
%

 

 
 

 (Decrease)/

Increase
£bn

 

 
 

  

(Decrease)/
Increase

%

 

(Decrease)/
Increase

£bn

 

0.5% increase to:

      

– Discount rate

  (8.5) (1.4)  (8.5) (1.2)

– Rate of inflation

  8.8  1.4   8.8  1.3 

– Rate of salary growth

  1.3  0.2   1.0  0.2 

1 year increase to longevity at 60

  2.5  0.4   2.5  0.4 

Post-retirement health care

A one percentage point change in assumed health care trend rates, assuming all other assumptions remain constant would have the following effects for 2007:2008:

 

  1% increase
£m
  1% decrease
£m
 
 
  

1% increase

£m

  

1% decrease

£m

 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

  1.9  (1.3)  1  (1)

Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation

  19.9  (14.6)  17  (14)

Assets

A long-term strategy has been set for the asset allocation of the UKRF which comprises a mixture of equities, bonds, property and other appropriate assets. This recognises that different asset classes are likely to produce different long-term returns and some asset classes may be more volatile than others.

The long-term strategy ensures that investments are adequately diversified. Asset managers are permitted some flexibility to vary the asset allocation from the long-term strategy within control ranges agreed with the trustee from time to time.

The UKRF also employs derivative instruments, where appropriate, to achieve a desired exposure or return, or to match assets more closely to liabilities. The value of assets shown below reflects the actual physical assets held by the scheme, with any derivative holdings reflected on a mark to market basis. The expected return on asset assumptions, both for individual asset classes and overall, have been based on the portfolio of assets created after allowing for the net impact of the derivatives on the risk and return profile of the holdings.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

223


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Assets (continued)

The value of the assets of the schemes, their percentage in relation to total scheme assets, and their expected rate of return at 31st December 20072008 and 31st December 20062007 were as follows:

 

   2007
  UK schemes  Overseas schemes  Total
   Value

£m

 

 

 % of

total fair

value of

scheme

assets

  Expected

rate

of

return

%

  Value
£m
 
 
 % of

total fair

value of

scheme

assets

  Expected

rate

of

return

%

  Value

£m

 

 

 % of

total fair

value of

scheme

assets

  Expected

rate

of

return

%

Equities

  7,467  43  8.3  441  55  8.4  7,908  44  8.3

Bonds

  7,445  43  5.1  300  38  7.6  7,745  43  5.2

Property

  1,712  10  7.0  16  2  11.5  1,728  10  7.0

Derivatives

  (12)   0.0        (12)   

Cash

  284  2  5.1  42  5  5.6  326  1  5.2

Other

  335  2  5.3  (3)     332  2  5.4

Fair value of plan assetsa

  17,231  100  6.7  796  100  7.8  18,027  100  6.8

Note

aExcludes £782m (2006: £613m) representing the money purchase assets of the UKRF.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

194


LOGO

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Assets (continued)

  2006   2008
  UK schemes  Overseas schemes  Total   UK schemes  Overseas schemes  Total
  Value

£m

  % of

total fair

value of

scheme

assets

  Expected

rate

of

return

%

  Value

£m

  % of

total fair

value of

scheme

assets

  Expected

rate

of

return

%

  Value
£m
  % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
  Expected
rate of
return
 
 
%
  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
 

Expected
rate

of

return %

  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
  

Expected
rate

of

return %

  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
 

Expected
rate

of

return %

Equities

  7,285  43  7.9  337  45  9.4  7,622  44  8.0   5,813  43  8.5  217  23  9.3  6,030  42  8.5

Bonds

  6.930  41  4.7  300  40  6.2  7,230  41  4.7   6,360  47  5.3  166  17  6.2  6,526  45  5.3

Property

  1,995  12  6.4  15  2  13.4  2,010  11  6.6   1,214  9  7.2  16  2  13.4  1,230  8  7.3

Derivatives

  21    n/a        21    n/a   (420) (3)         (420) (3) 

Cash

  293  2  4.6  37  5  5.9  330  2  4.8   (131) (1) 2.0  415  43  7.6  284  2  3.9

Other

  237  2  5.9  56  8  9.4  293  2  6.6   701  5  7.4  145  15  6.4  846  6  7.2

Fair value of plan asseta

  16,761  100  6.3  745  100  7.9  17,506  100  6.4 

Fair value of plan assetsa

  13,537  100  6.8  959  100  8.0  14,496  100  6.9
  2007
  UK schemes  Overseas schemes  Total
  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
 

Expected
rate

of

return %

  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
  

Expected
rate

of

return %

  Value
£m
 % of
total fair
value of
scheme
assets
 

Expected
rate

of

return %

Equities

  7,467  43  8.3  441  55  8.4  7,908  44  8.3

Bonds

  7,445  43  5.1  300  38  7.6  7,745  43  5.2

Property

  1,712  10  7.0  16  2  11.5  1,728  10  7.0

Derivatives

  (12)           (12)   

Cash

  284  2  5.1  42  5  5.6  326  1  5.2

Other

  335  2  5.3  (3)     332  2  5.4

Fair value of plan assetsa

  17,231  100  6.7  796  100  7.8  18,027  100  6.8

The UKRF plan assets include £39m£27m relating to UK private equity investments (2006: £27m)(2007: £39m) and £664m£735m relating to overseas private equity investments (2006: £447m)(2007: £664m). These are disclosed within Equities.

Amounts included in the fair value of plan assets include £6m (2006: £7m)£5m (2007: £6m) relating to shares in Barclays Group, £6m (2006: £10m)£11m (2007: £6m) relating to bonds issued by the Barclays Group, £nil (2006: £1m)(2007: £nil) relating to other investments in the Barclays Group, and £10m (2006: £8m)£17m (2007: £10m) relating to property occupied by Group companies.

The expected return on assets is determined by calculating a total return estimate based on weighted average estimated returns for each asset class. Asset class returns are estimated using current and projected economic and market factors such as inflation, credit spreads and equity risk premiums.

The Group actual return on plan assets was a decrease of £3,480m (2007: £731m (2006: £1,447m).increase.)

Note

aExcludes £675m (2007: £782m) representing the money purchase assets of the UKRF.

224

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Actuarial gains and losses

The actuarial gains and losses arising on plan liabilities and plan assets are as follows:

 

   

 

UK schemes

  Overseas schemes  Total 
   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
 2004
£m
 
 

 

Present value of obligations

  (16,623) (17,353) (18,252) (15,574) (1,011) (970) (1,017) (587) (17,634) (18,323) (19,269) (16,161)
Fair value of plan assets  17,231  16,761  15,571  13,261  796  745  819  436  18,027  17,506  16,390  13,697 

 

Net surplus/(deficit) in the plans

  608  (592) (2,681) (2,313) (215) (225) (198) (151) 393  (817) (2,879) (2,464)
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities             

– amount

  (297) 48  (2) 16  (79) (54) (2) (31) (376) (6) (4) (15)

– as percentage of plan liabilities

  (2%)       (8%) (6%)   (5%) (2%)      

 

Difference between actual and expected return on net assets

             

– amount

  (332) 423  1,599  570  (11) 25  2  9  (343) 448  1,601  579 

– as percentage of plan assets

  (2%) 3%  10%  4%    3%    2%  (2%) 3%  10%  4% 

Note

aExcludes £782m (2006: £613m) representing the money purchase assets of the UKRF.
    UK schemes 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004
£m
 

Present value of obligations

  (14,438) (16,623) (17,353) (18,252) (15,574)

Fair value of plan assets

  13,537  17,231  16,761  15,571  13,261 

Net (deficit)/surplus in the plans

  (901) 608  (592) (2,681) (2,313)

Experience gains and (losses) on plan liabilities

      

– amount

  (81) (297) 48  (2) 16 

– as percentage of plan liabilities

  (1%) (2%)      

Difference between actual and expected return on plan assets

      

– amount

  (4,534) (332) 423  1,599  570 

– as percentage of plan assets

  (33%) (2%) 3%  10%  4% 
    Overseas schemes 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004
£m
 

Present value of obligations

  (1,345) (1,011) (970) (1,017) (587)

Fair value of plan assets

  959  796  745  819  436 

Net (deficit)/surplus in the plans

  (386) (215) (225) (198) (151)

Experience losses on plan liabilities

      

– amount

  (96)  (79) (54) (2) (31)

– as percentage of plan liabilities

  (7%) (8%) (6%)   (5%)

Difference between actual and expected return on plan assets

      

– amount

  (121) (11) 25  2  9 

– as percentage of plan assets

  (13%)   3%    2% 
    Total UK and Overseas schemes 
    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2004
£m
 

Present value of obligations

  (15,783) (17,634) (18,323) (19,269) (16,161)

Fair value of plan assets

  14,496  18,027  17,506  16,390  13,697 

Net (deficit)/surplus in the plans

  (1,287) 393  (817) (2,879) (2,464)

Experience losses on plan liabilities

      

– amount

  (177) (376) (6) (4) (15)

– as percentage of plan liabilities

  (1%) (2%)      

Difference between actual and expected return on plan assets

      

– amount

  (4,655) (343) 448  1,601  579 

– as percentage of plan assets

  (32%) (2%) 3%  10%  4% 

 

195 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 225


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

30 Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

Funding

The most recent triennial funding valuation of the UK Retirement Fund was performed inwith an effective date of 30th September 2007. In compliance with the Pensions Act 2004, the Group and Trustee have agreed a scheme specific funding target, statement of funding principles, and a schedule of contributions. This agreement forms the basis of the Group’s commitment that the fund has sufficient assets to make payments to members in respect of their accrued benefits as and when they fall due. This funding valuation uses a discount rate that reflects a prudent expectation of long-term future investment returns from the current and assumed future return from the actual asset allocation at that date,investment strategy, and takes into account projected future salary increases when assessing liabilities arising from accrued service. The

As at 30th September 2007 the funding valuation is updated annually on the basis of interim assumptions. The UK Retirement Fund recordedshowed a funding surplus of £1.2bn£0.2bn. The Scheme Actuary prepares an annual update of the funding position as at 31st December 2007 (2006: £1.3bn).30th September. The first annual update was carried out as at 30th September 2008 and showed a deficit of £2.2bn.

The Group has agreed funding contributions which, in aggregate, are no less than those which are sufficient to meet the Group’s share of the cost of benefits accruing over each year. The Group has, in the recent past, chosen to make funding contributions in excess of this, more consistent with the IAS service cost.

Defined benefit contributions paid with respect to the UKRF were as follows:

 

    £m

Contributions paid

  

2007

  355

2006

  351

2005

  354

There is a triennial valuation currently in progress with an effective date of 30th September 2007. To comply with the requirements of the Pensions Act 2004, the Group and trustees plan to agree a scheme specific funding target, statement of funding principles, and a schedule of contributions which in 2008 will supersede those in place under the current actuarial funding valuation.

    £m

Contributions paid

  

2008

  336

2007

  355

2006

  351

Excluding the UKRF, the Group is expected to pay contributions of approximately £2m to UK schemes and £41m£53m to overseas schemes in 2008.2009.

The total contribution to be paid in 20082009 to the UKRF is not expected to be significantly different than in previous years.

31 Ordinary shares, share premium, and other equity

Ordinary shares and share premium

 

   Number of
shares
m
 
 
 
 Ordinary

shares

£m

 

 

 

 Share

premium

£m

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

 

At 1st January 2007

  6,535  1,634  5,818  7,452 

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  19  6  62  68 

Issued under the Incentive Share Option Plan

  10  2  40  42 

Issued under the Executive Share Option Schemea

      1  1 

Issued under the Woolwich Executive Share Option Plana

      1  1 

Transfer to retained earnings

      (7,223) (7,223)

Issue of new ordinary shares

  337  84  1,357  1,441 

Repurchase of shares

  (300) (75)   (75)

 

At 31st December 2007

  6,601  1,651  56  1,707 

 

At 1st January 2006

  6,490  1,623  5,650  7,273 

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  18  5  67  72 

Issued under the Incentive Share Option Plan

  25  6  96  102 

Issued under the Executive Share Option Schemea

  1    3  3 

Issued under the Woolwich Executive Share Option Plana

  1    2  2 

 

At 31st December 2006

  6,535  1,634  5,818  7,452 

The authorised share capital of Barclays PLC is £2,500m (2006: £2,500m), comprising 9,996 million (2006: 9,996 million) ordinary shares of 25p each and 1 million (2006: 1 million) staff shares of £1 each. All issued shares are fully paid.

Called up share capital, allotted and fully paid

  2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

Ordinary shares:

   

At beginning of year

  1,633  1,622

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  6  5

Issued under Incentive Share Option Plan

  2  6

Issue of new ordinary shares

  84  

Repurchase of shares

  (75) 

 

At end of year

  1,650  1,633

Staff shares

  1  1

Total

  1,651  1,634
    

Number of
shares

m

  Ordinary
shares
£m
  Share
premium
£m
  Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2008

  6,601  1,651  56  1,707 

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  3  1  13  14 

Issued under the Incentive Share Option Plana

  1    3  3 

Issued to staff under the Share Incentive Plana

  1    2  2 

Issue of new ordinary shares

  1,803  451  3,971  4,422 

Repurchase of shares

  (37) (10)   (10)

At 31st December 2008

  8,372  2,093  4,045  6,138 

At 1st January 2007

  6,535  1,634  5,818  7,452 

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  19  6  62  68 

Issued under the Incentive Share Option Plan

  10  2  40  42 

Issued under the Executive Share Option Schemeb

      1  1 

Issued under the Woolwich Executive Share Option Planb

      1  1 

Transfer to retained earnings

      (7,223) (7,223)

Issue of new ordinary shares

  337  84  1,357  1,441 

Repurchase of shares

  (300) (75)   (75)

At 31st December 2007

  6,601  1,651  56  1,707 

Note

aThe nominal value for share options issued during 2008 for the Incentive Share Option Plan and Share Incentive Plan was less than £500,000 in each case.

bThe nominal value for share options issued during 2007 and 2006 for the Executive Share Option Scheme and Woolwich ESOPExecutive Share Option Plan was less than £500,000 in each case.

 

226

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

196


LOGO

LOGO

31 Ordinary shares, and share premium, and other equity (continued)

The authorised share capital of Barclays PLC is £3,540m, $77.5m,40m and ¥4,000m. (31st December 2007: £2,500m) comprising 13,996 million (31st December 2007: 9,996 million) ordinary shares of 25p each, 0.4 million Sterling preference shares of £100 each, 0.4 million US Dollar preference shares of $100 each, 150 million US Dollar preference shares of $0.25 each, 0.4 million Euro preference shares of100 each, 0.4 million Yen preference shares of ¥10,000 each and 1 million (31st December 2007: 1 million) staff shares of £1 each.

Called up share capital, allotted and fully paid  2008
£m
  2007
£m
 

Ordinary shares:

   

At beginning of year

  1,650  1,633 

Issued to staff under the Sharesave Share Option Scheme

  1  6 

Issued under the Incentive Share Option Plan

    2 

Issue of new ordinary shares

  451  84 

Repurchase of shares

  (9) (75)

At end of year

  2,093  1,650 

Staff shares:

   

At beginning of year

  1  1 

Repurchase of shares

  (1)  

At end of year

    1 

Total

  2,093  1,651 

Issue of new ordinary shares

During the year, the following share issues took place:

On 14th August 2007, 336.84th July 2008, Barclays PLC raised approximately £500m (before issue costs) through the issue of 168.9 million new ordinary shares with an aggregate nominal valueat £2.96 per share in a firm placing to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation.

On 22nd July 2008, Barclays PLC raised approximately £3,969m (before issue costs) through the issue of £841,407.4 million were issued fornew ordinary shares at £2.82 per share in a cash consideration, before issue costs,placing to Qatar Investment Authority, Challenger Universal Limited (a company representing the beneficial interests of £2,425m. The shares were issued to TemasekHis Excellency Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jabr Al-Thani, the Chairman of Qatar Holding LLC, and his family), China Development Bank, Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited and certain leading institutional shareholders and other investors, which shares were available for clawback in full by means of an open offer to existing shareholders. Valid applications under the open offer were received from qualifying shareholders in respect of approximately 267 million new ordinary shares in aggregate, representing 19.0 per cent. of the shares offered pursuant to the open offer. Accordingly, the remaining 1,140.3 million shares were allocated to the various investors with whom they had been conditionally placed.

On 18th September 2008, Barclays PLC raised approximately £701m (before issue costs) through the issue of 226 million new ordinary shares at a market price of £7.20£3.10 per share.share to certain institutional investors. The proceeds of the Temasek issuance, in excess of the nominal value and issue costs, of £941m£634m were credited to retained earnings. This resulted from the operation of section 131 of the Companies Act 1985 with regard to the issue of shares by Barclays PLC in exchange for shares in OdysseusLong Island Investments Jersey (No1)No. 1 Limited and the subsequent redemption of the no par value redeemable preference shares of that company for cash.

During the period from 27th November 2008 to 31st December 2008, 33,000 ordinary shares have been issued following conversion of Mandatorily Convertible Notes (see below) at the option of their holders.

Share repurchase

During the year Barclays PLC purchased in the market 30036 million of its own ordinary shares of 25p each at a total cost of £1,802m in order to minimise the dilutive effect of the issuance of Barclays shares to Temasek and China Development Bank on existing shareholders.£173m. These transactions represent 4.54%less than 0.5% of the issued share capital at 31st December 2007. All2008. These shares purchased during the period were open market transactions.

Barclays PLC purchased all of its staff shares in issue, following approval for such purchase being given at the 2008 Annual General Meeting, at a total cost of £1m.

At the 20072008 AGM on 26th24th April, Barclays PLC was authorised to repurchase 980,840,000984,960,000 of its ordinary shares of 25p. The authorisation is effective until the AGM in 2008.2009.

Cancellation of share premium account

On 11th October 2007, the order of the High Court confirming the cancellation of £7,223m of the share premium account was registered with the Registrar of Companies. This created £7,223m of additional distributable reserves in Barclays PLC. The purpose of the cancellation of the share premium account was to create distributable profits in order to allow the payment of dividends following the completion of the share buy-back programme, the redemption of the preference shares which were to have been issued in connection with the proposed merger with ABN AMRO, and to provide maximum flexibility to manage the Group’s capital resources.

Warrants

On 31st October 2008 Barclays PLC issued, in conjunction with a simultaneous issue of Reserve Capital Instruments, warrants to subscribe for up to 1516.9 million new ordinary shares at a price of £1.97775 to Qatar Holding and HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan. A fair value of £800m before transaction costs of £24m was attributed to the warrants, which may be exercised at any time up to close of business 31st October 2013.

The fair value (net of transaction costs) of the warrants have been included in retained earnings (see Note 32).

Shares under option

The Group has four schemes that give employees rights to subscribe for new shares in Barclays PLC. A summary of the key terms of each scheme are included in Note 44.45.

At 31st December 2007,2008, 94.1 million (2007: 74.0 million (2006: 78.9 million) options were outstanding under the terms of the Sharesave Share Option Scheme (Sharesave), 1.40.5 million (2006: 1.7(2007: 1.4 million) options were outstanding under the terms of the Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS), 0.50.4 million (2006: 0.7(2007: 0.5 million) options were outstanding under the terms of the Woolwich Executive Share Option Plan (Woolwich ESOP) and 20.5 million (2006: 77.5(2007: 20.5 million) options were outstanding under the terms of the Incentive Share Option Plan (ISOP), enabling certain Directors and members of staff to subscribe for ordinary shares between 20072008 and 2016 at prices ranging from 176p144p to 562p.

Options and awards arising under the Executive Share Award Scheme, Performance Share Plan and Sharepurchase Scheme, which are described in Note 44 are not settled by the issuance of new shares but from shares held in employee benefit trusts. Details concerning the shares held in such trusts are provided in Note 32.551p.

 

197 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 227


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 20072008

31 Ordinary shares, share premium, and other equity (continued)

In addition to the above, the independent trustee of the Barclays Group (ESAS) Employees’ Benefit Trust (ESAS Trust), established by Barclays Bank PLC in 1996, operates the Executive Share Award Scheme (ESAS). ESAS is a deferred share bonus plan for employees of the Group. The key terms of the ESAS are described in Note 45. The independent trustees of the ESAS Trust make awards of Barclays shares and grant options over Barclays shares to beneficiaries of the ESAS Trust. Beneficiaries of the ESAS Trust include employees and former employees of the Barclays Group.

The independent trustee of the Barclays Group (PSP and ESOS) Employees’ Benefit Trust (PSP Trust), established by Barclays Bank PLC in 1996, operates the Performance Share Plan (PSP) and may satisfy awards under the ESOS. No awards have been made under this trust since 1999. All awards are in the form of options over Barclays shares.

The Sharepurchase scheme which was established in 2002 is open to all eligible UK employees, including executive Directors. The key terms of the Sharepurchase scheme are described in Note 45.

Other equity – Mandatorily Convertible Notes

On 27th November 2008, Barclays Bank PLC issued £4,050m of 9.75% Mandatorily Convertible Notes (MCNs) maturing on 30th September 2009 to Qatar Holding LLC, Challenger Universal Limited and entities representing the beneficial interests of HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of the Royal Family of Abu Dhabi and existing institutional shareholders and other institutional investors. If not converted at the holders’ option beforehand, these instruments mandatorily convert to ordinary shares of Barclays PLC on 30th June 2009. The conversion price is £1.53276, and, after taking into account MCNs that were converted on or before 31st December 2008, will result in the issue of 2,642 million new ordinary shares. Following conversion the relevant amounts will be credited to share capital and share premium.

Of the proceeds of the MCNs, £233m has been included in the Group’s liabilities, being the fair value of the coupon before issue costs at the date of issue. The remaining proceeds are included in other equity and will be transferred to share capital and share premium on conversion in both the Barclays PLC Group and Company.

32 Reserves

Other reserves – Barclays PLC Group

 

  Capital
redemption

reserve
£m

  Other

capital

reserve

£m

  Available

for sale

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Cash flow

hedging

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Currency

translation

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

  

Capital
redemption
reserve

£m

  Other
capital
reserve
£m
  Available
for sale
reserve
£m
 Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£m
 Currency
translation
reserve
£m
 Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2007

  309  617  132  (230) (438) 390 

Net gains from changes in fair value

      480  182    662 

At 1st January 2008

  384  617  154  26  (307) 874 

Net (losses)/gains from changes in fair value

      (1,736) 252    (1,484)

Net (gains)/losses transferred to net profit

      (560) 198    (362)      (212) 19    (193)

Currency translation differences

          29  29           2,307  2,307 

Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

      13      13       382      382 

Changes in insurance liabilities

      22      22       17      17 

Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

      68      68 

Net gains transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

      (2)     (2)

Tax

      (1) (124) 102  (23)      207  (165) 840  882 

Repurchase of shares

  75          75   10          10 

At 31st December 2007

  384  617  154  26  (307) 874 
         
  Capital
redemption

reserve
£m

  Other

capital

reserve

£m

  Available

for sale

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Cash flow

hedging

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Currency

translation

reserve

£m

 

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

At 1st January 2006

  309  617  225  70  156  1,377 

Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

      71  (421)   (350)

Net gains transferred to net profit

      (308) (51)   (359)

Currency translation differences

          (464) (464)

Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

      86      86 

Changes in insurance liabilities

      23      23 

Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

      13      13 

Tax

      22  172  (130) 64 

At 31st December 2006

  309  617  132  (230) (438) 390 

At 31st December 2008

  394  617  (1,190) 132  2,840  2,793 

    

Capital
redemption
reserve

£m

  Other
capital
reserve
£m
  Available
for sale
reserve
£m
  Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£m
  Currency
translation
reserve
£m
  Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2007

  309  617  132  (230) (438) 390 

Net gains from changes in fair value

      480  182    662 

Net (gains)/losses transferred to net profit

      (560) 198    (362)

Currency translation differences

          29  29 

Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

      13      13 

Changes in insurance liabilities

      22      22 

Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

      68      68 

Tax

      (1) (124) 102  (23)

Repurchase of shares

  75          75 

At 31st December 2007

  384  617  154  26  (307) 874 

The capital redemption reserve and other capital reserve represent transfers from retained earnings in accordance with relevant legislation. These reserves are not distributable.

The available for sale reserve represents the unrealised change in the fair value of available for sale investments since initial recognition.

The cash flow hedging reserve represents the cumulative gains and losses on effective cash flow hedging instruments that will be recycled to the income statement when the hedged transactions affect profit or loss.

The currency translation reserve represents the cumulative gains and losses on the retranslation of the Group’s net investment in foreign operations, net of the effects of hedging.

Transfers from cash flow hedging reserve

Gains and losses transferred from the cash flow hedging reserve were to: interest income: £93m£4m loss (2006: £7m loss)(2007: £93m), interest expense: £74m loss (2007: £11m gain (2006: £73m gain), net trading income: £119m gain (2007: £100m loss (2006: £15m loss), and administration and general expenses: £60m loss (2007: £16m loss (2006: £nil)loss).

 

228

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

198


LOGO

LOGO

32 Reserves (continued)

Retained earnings and treasury shares – Barclays PLC Group

 

  Retained
earnings
£m
 Treasury
shares
£m
 Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2008

  20,970  (260) 20,710 

Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent

  4,382    4,382 

Equity-settled share schemes

  463    463 

Tax on equity-settled share schemes

  (4)   (4)

Other taxes

  (52)   (52)

Net purchases of treasury shares

    (350) (350)

Transfer

  (437) 437   

Dividends paid

  (2,344)   (2,344)

Repurchase of shares

  (173)   (173)

Arising on share issue

  634    634 

Issue of warrants

  776    776 

Other

  (7)   (7)

At 31st December 2008

  24,208  (173) 24,035 
  Retained
earnings
£m
 
 
 
 Treasury
shares
£m
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 

At 1st January 2007

  12,169  (212) 11,957   12,169  (212) 11,957 

Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent

  4,417    4,417   4,417    4,417 

Equity-settled share schemes

  567    567   567    567 

Tax on equity-settled share schemes

  28    28   28    28 

Net purchases of treasury shares

    (572) (572)    (572) (572)

Transfer

  (524) 524     (524) 524   

Dividends paid

  (2,079)   (2,079)  (2,079)   (2,079)

Repurchase of shares

  (1,802)   (1,802)  (1,802)   (1,802)

Transfer from share premium account

  7,223    7,223   7,223    7,223 

Arising on share issue

  941    941   941    941 

Other

  30    30   30    30 

At 31st December 2007

  20,970  (260) 20,710   20,970  (260) 20,710 

At 1st January 2006

  8,957  (181) 8,776 

Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent

  4,571    4,571 

Equity-settled share schemes

  663    663 

Tax on equity-settled share schemes

  96    96 

Net purchases of treasury shares

    (425) (425)

Transfer

  (394) 394   

Dividends paid

  (1,771)   (1,771)

Other

  47    47 

At 31st December 2006

  12,169  (212) 11,957 

The Treasury shares primarily relate to Barclays PLC shares held by employee benefit trusts in relation to the Executive Share Award Scheme, Performance Share Plan and Sharepurchase Scheme, to the extent that such shares have not been allocated to employees. These schemes are described in Note 44.45.

The total number of Barclays shares held in Group employee benefit trusts at 31st December 20072008 was 211.4217.9 million (2006: 168(2007: 211.4 million). Dividend rights have been waived on nil (2006:(2007: nil) of these shares. The total market value of the shares held in trust based on the year-end share price of £5.04 (2006: £7.30)£1.53 (2007: £5.04) was £1,065m (2006: £1,227m)£333m (2007: £1,065m). As at 31st December 2007,2008, options over 16.619.1 million (2006: 9.6(2007: 16.6 million) of the total shares held in the trusts were exercisable.

The Group operates in a number of countries subject to regulations under which a local subsidiary has to maintain a minimum level of capital. The current policy of the Group is that local capital requirements are met, as far as possible, by the retention of profit. Certain countries operate exchange control regulations which limit the amount of dividends that can be remitted to non-resident shareholders. It is not possible to determine the amount of profit retained and other reserves that are restricted by these regulations, but the net profit retained of overseas subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures at 31st December 20072008 totalled £7,311m (2006: £5,667m)£4,581m (2007: £7,311m). If such overseas reserves were to be remitted, other tax liabilities, which have not been provided for in the accounts, might arise.

Retained earnings – Barclays PLC (Parent company)

 

  Retained
earnings
£m
 

Capital
redemption
reserve

£m

  Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2008

  8,990  384  9,374 

Profit after tax

  1,193    1,193 

Dividends paid

  (2,414)   (2,414)

Arising on share issue

  634    634 

Repurchase of shares

  (173) 10  (163)

Issue of warrants

  776    776 

At 31st December 2008

  9,006  394  9,400 
  Retained

earnings

£m

 

 

 

 Capital

redemption

reserve

£m

  Total

£m

 

 

At 1st January 2007

  1,468  309  1,777   1,468  309  1,777 

Profit after tax

  3,289    3,289   3,289    3,289 

Dividends paid

  (2,129)   (2,129)  (2,129)   (2,129)

Transfer from share premium account

  7,223    7,223   7,223    7,223 

Arising on share issue

  941    941   941    941 

Repurchase of shares

  (1,802) 75  (1,727)  (1,802) 75  (1,727)

At 31st December 2007

  8,990  384  9,374   8,990  384  9,374 

At 1st January 2006

  1,318  309  1,627 

Profit after tax

  1,964    1,964 

Dividends paid

  (1,814)   (1,814)

At 31st December 2006

  1,468  309  1,777 

Details of principal subsidiaries held through Barclays Bank PLC are shown in Note 40.

The operation of section 131 of the Companies Act 1985 with regard to the issue of shares by Barclays PLC in exchange for shares in Odysseus Jersey (No 1) Limited and the subsequent redemption of the no par value redeemable preference shares of that company for cash, has resulted in additional distributable profits of £941m.

On 11th October 2007, the order of the High Court confirming the cancellation of £7,223m of the share premium account was registered with the Registrar of Companies. This created £7,223m additional distributable reserves in Barclays PLC. The purpose of the cancellation of the share premium account was to create distributable profits in order to allow the payment of dividends following the completion of the share buy-back programme, the redemption of the preference shares which were to have been issued in connection with the proposed merger with ABN AMRO, and to provide maximum flexibility to manage the company’s capital resources.41.

 

199 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 229


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

33 Minority interests

 

  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

At beginning of year

  7,591  7,004   9,185  7,591 

Share of profit after tax

  678  624   905  678 

Dividend and other payments

  (480) (452)  (703) (480)

Equity issued by subsidiaries

  1,381  639   1,349  1,381 

Available for sale reserve: net gain/(loss) from changes in fair value

  1  (2)

Cash flow hedges: net loss from changes in fair value

  (16) (9)

Available for sale reserve: net (loss)/gain from changes in fair value

  (1) 1 

Cash flow hedges: net gain/(loss) from changes in fair value

  76  (16)

Currency translation differences

  25  (317)  100  25 

Additions

  142  51     27 

Disposals

  (111) (34)  (11) (111)

Other

  (26) 87   (107) 89 

At end of year

  9,185  7,591   10,793  9,185 

During the year, subsidiariesBarclays Bank PLC issued the following Preference Shares:

106 million Preference Shares of nominal US$0.25 each (Principal amount: US$2,650m; £1,345m) with a 8.125% dividend issued on 11th April 2008 and 25th April 2008.

·

1.9 million Preference Shares of nominal ZAR0.01 each (Principal amount: ZAR1,652m; £118m) with a variable dividend issued in 2007

·

55 million Preference Shares of nominal US$0.25 each (Principal amount: US$1,375m; £677m) with a 7.1% dividend issued on 13th September 2007

·

46 million Preference Shares of nominal US$0.25 each (Principal amount: US$1,150m; £567m) with a 7.75% dividend issued on 7th December 2007

34 Contingent liabilities and commitments

Contingent liabilities and commitments

The following table summarises the nominal principal amount of contingent liabilities and commitments with off-balance sheet risk:

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Acceptances and endorsements

  365  287  585  365

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  35,692  31,252  15,652  12,973

Securities lending arrangements

  38,290  22,719

Other contingent liabilities

  9,717  7,880  11,783  9,717

Contingent liabilities

  45,774  39,419  66,310  45,774

Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions

  522  414  859  522

Undrawn note issuance and revolving underwriting facilities:

        

Forward asset purchases and forward deposits placed

  283  360  291  283

Standby facilities, credit lines and other

  191,834  204,730  259,666  191,834

Commitments

  192,639  205,504  260,816  192,639

Nature of instruments

In common with other banks, the Group conducts business involving acceptances, performance bonds and indemnities. The majority of these facilities are offset by corresponding obligations of third parties.

An acceptance is an undertaking by a bank to pay a bill of exchange drawn on a customer. The Group expects most acceptances to be presented, but reimbursement by the customer is normally immediate. Endorsements are residual liabilities of the Group in respect of bills of exchange, which have been paid and subsequently rediscounted.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

200


LOGO

34 Contingent liabilities and commitments (continued)

Guarantees and letters of credit are given as security to support the performance of a customer to third parties. As the Group will only be required to meet these obligations in the event of the customer’s default, the cash requirements of these instruments are expected to be considerably below their nominal amounts.

The Group facilitates securities lending arrangements for its investment management clients whereby securities held by funds are lent to third parties. The borrowers provide the funds with collateral in the form of cash or other assets equal to at least 100% of the securities lent plus a margin of at least 2% up to 8%. Over the period of the loan, the funds may make margin calls to the extent that the collateral is less than the market value of the securities lent. Amounts disclosed above represent the total market value of the lent securities at 31st December 2008. The market value of collateral held by the funds was £39,690m (2007: £23,559m).

230

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

34 Contingent liabilities and commitments (continued)

Other contingent liabilities include transaction related customs and performance bonds and are, generally, short-term commitments to third parties which are not directly dependent on the customer’s creditworthiness.

Commitments to lend are agreements to lend to a customer in the future, subject to certain conditions. Such commitments are either made for a fixed period, or have no specific maturity but are cancellable by the lender subject to notice requirements.

Documentary credits commit the Group to make payments to third parties, on production of documents, which are usually reimbursed immediately by customers.

Capital commitments

At 31st December 20072008 the commitments for capital expenditure under contract amounted to £6m (2006: £9m)£48m (2007: £6m).

Assets pledged

Assets are pledged as collateral to secure liabilities under repurchase agreements, securitisations and stock lending agreements or as security deposits relating to futures and options.derivatives. The disclosure includes any asset transfers associated with liabilities under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions.

The following table summarises the nature and carrying amount of the assets pledged as security against these liabilities:

 

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Trading portfolio assets

  76,226  77,255  81,186  76,226

Loans and advances

  32,846  23,715  28,789  32,846

Available for sale investments

  16,378  20,495  32,321  16,378

Other

  580  4  3,812  580

Assets pledged

  126,030  121,469  146,108  126,030

Collateral held as security for assets

Under certain transactions, including reverse repurchase agreements and stock borrowing transactions, the Group is allowed to resell or repledge the collateral held. The fair value at the balance sheet date of collateral accepted and repledged to others was as follows:

 

  2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Fair value of securities accepted as collateral

  343,986  279,591  424,819  343,986

Of which fair value of securities repledged / transferred to others

  269,157  210,182  374,222  269,157

35 Legal proceedings

Barclays has for some time been party to proceedings, including a class action, in the United States against a number of defendants following the collapse of Enron; the class action claim is commonly known as the Newby litigation. On 20th July 2006 Barclays received an Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division which dismissed the claims against Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. in the Newby litigation. On 4th December 2006 the Court stayed Barclays dismissal from the proceedings and allowed the plaintiffs to file a supplemental complaint. On 19th March 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision on an appeal by Barclays and two other financial institutions contesting a ruling by the District Court allowing the Newby litigation to proceed as a class action. The Court of Appeals held that because no proper claim against Barclays and the other financial institutions had been alleged by the plaintiffs, the case could not proceed against them. The plaintiffs applied to the United States Supreme Court for a review of this decision. On 22nd January 2008, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request for review. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the District Court ordered a further briefing concerning the status of the plaintiffs’ claims. Barclays plans to seekis seeking the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims.

Barclays considers that the Enron related claims against it are without merit and is defending them vigorously. It is not possible to estimate Barclays possible loss in relation to these matters, nor the effect that they might have upon operating results in any particular financial period.

Barclays has been in negotiations with the staff of the US Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to a settlement of the Commission’s investigations of transactions between Barclays and Enron. Barclays does not expect that the amount of any settlement with the Commission would have a significant adverse effect on its financial position or operating results.

Like other UK financial services institutions, Barclaysthe Group faces numerous County Court claims and complaints by customers who allege that its unauthorised overdraft charges either contravene the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCR) or are unenforceable penalties or both. In July 2007, by agreement with all parties, the OFT commenced proceedings against seven banks and one building society, including Barclays, to resolve the matter by way of a ‘test case’ process. Preliminary issues hearings took place in January, July and December 2008 with judgments handed down in April and October 2008 and January 2009 (a further judgment not concerning Barclays terms). As to current terms, in April 2008 the Court held in favour of the banks on the issue of the penalty doctrine. The OFT did not appeal that decision. In the same judgment the Court held in favour of the OFT on the issue of the applicability of the UTCCR. The banks appealed that decision. As to past terms, in a judgment on 8th October 2008, the Court held that Barclays historic terms, including those of Woolwich, were not capable of being penalties. The OFT indicated at the January 2009 hearing that it was not seeking permission to appeal the Court’s findings in relation to the applicability of the penalty doctrine to historic terms. Accordingly, it is now clear that no declarations have or will be made against Barclays that any of its unauthorised overdraft terms assessed in the test case constitute unenforceable penalties and that the OFT will not pursue this aspect of the test case further. The proceedings will now concentrate exclusively on UTCCR issues. The banks’ appeal against the decision in relation to the applicability of the UTCCR (to current and historic terms) took place at a hearing in late October 2008. On 26th February 2009 the Court of Appeal dismissed the banks’ appeal, holding, in a judgment of broad application, that the relevant charges were not exempt from the UTCCR. The banks will petition the House of Lords for leave to appeal the decision. It is likely that the proceedings will still take a significant period of time to conclude. Pending resolution of the test case referred to below (the ‘test case’),process, existing and new claims in the County Courts areremain stayed, and there is an FSA waiver of the complaints handling process (which is reviewable in July 2009) and a standstill of Financial Ombudsman Service decisions. In July 2007, and by agreement with all parties, the OFT launched the test case by commencing proceedings against seven banks and one building society including Barclays, the first stage of which seeks declarations on two issues of legal principle. The hearing commenced on 17th January 2008. BarclaysGroup is defending the test case vigorously. It is not practicable to estimate Barclaysthe Group’s possible loss in relation to these matters, nor the effect that they may have upon operating results in any particular financial period.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

231


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

35 Legal proceedings (continued)

Barclays is engaged in various other litigation proceedings both in the United Kingdom and a number of overseas jurisdictions, including the United States, involving claims by and against it which arise in the ordinary course of business. Barclays does not expect the ultimate resolution of any of the proceedings to which Barclays is party to have a significant adverse effect on the financial position of the Group and Barclays has not disclosed the contingent liabilities associated with these claims either because they cannot reasonably be estimated or because such disclosure could be prejudicial to the conduct of the claims.

201

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

36 Competition and regulatory matters

The scale of regulatory change remains challenging, arising in part from the implementation of some key European Union (EU) directives. Many changes to financial services legislation and regulation have come into force in recent years and further changes will take place in the near future. Concurrently, there is continuing political and regulatory scrutiny of the operation of the retail banking and consumer credit industries in the UK and elsewhere. The nature and impact of future changes in policies and regulatory action are not predictable and beyond the Group’s control but could have an impact on the Group’s businesses and earnings. In June 2005 an inquiry into retail banking in all of the then 25 Member States was launched by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition. The inquiry looked at retail banking in Europe generally. In January 2007 the European Commission announced that the inquiry had identified barriers to competition in certain areas of retail banking, payment cards and payment systems in the EU. The Commission indicated it will use its powers to address these barriers, and will encourage national competition authorities to enforce European and national competition laws where appropriate. Any action taken by the Commission and national competition authorities could have an impact on the payment cards and payment systems businesses of Barclays and on its retail banking activities in the EU countries in which it operates.

In September 2005, the UK Office of Fair Trading (OFT) received a super-complaint from the Citizens Advice Bureau relating to payment protection insurance (PPI). As a result, the OFT commenced a market study on PPI in April 2006. In October 2006 the OFT announced the outcome of the market study and following a period of consultation, the OFT referred the PPI market to the UK Competition Commission (CC) for an in-depth inquiry in February 2007. This inquiry could lastIn June 2008, the CC published its provisional findings. The CC published its final report into the PPI market on 29th January 2009. The CC’s conclusion is that the businesses which offer PPI alongside credit face little or no competition when selling PPI to their credit customers. The CC has set out a package of measures which it considers will introduce competition into the market (the ‘Remedies’). The Remedies, which are expected to be implemented (following consultation) in 2010, are: a ban on sale of PPI at the point of sale; a prohibition on the sale of single premium PPI; mandatory personal PPI quotes to customers; annual statements for upall regular premium policies, including the back book (for example credit card and mortgage protection policies); measures to two years. Also inensure that improved information is available to customers; obliging providers to give information to the OFT to monitor the Remedies and to provide claims ratios to any person on request. Barclays is reviewing the report and considering the next steps, including how this might affect the Group’s different products.

In October 2006, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA)FSA published the outcome of its broad industry thematic review of PPI sales practices in which it concluded that some firms fail to treat customers fairly.fairly and that the FSA would strengthen its actions against such firms. Tackling poor PPI sales practices remains a priority for the FSA, with their most recent update on their thematic work published in September 2008. Barclays voluntarily complied with the FSA’s request to cease selling single premium PPI by the end of January 2009. There has been no enforcement action against Barclays in respect of its PPI products. The Group has cooperated fully with these investigations into PPI and will continue to do so.

In April 2006, the OFT commenced a review of the undertakings given following the conclusion of the Competition Commission inquiry in 2002 into the supply of banking services to small and medium enterprises. Based on the OFT’s report, the Competition Commission issued its final decision on 21st December 2007 and decided to release the UK’s four largest clearing banks (including Barclays) from most of the transitional undertakings given by them in 2002.

The OFT has carried out investigations into Visa and MasterCard credit card interchange rates. The decision by the OFT in the MasterCard interchange case was set aside by the Competition Appeals Tribunal in June 2006. The OFT’s investigationOFT is progressing its investigations in the Visa interchange case is at an earlier stage and a second MasterCard interchange case isin parallel and both are ongoing. The outcome is not known but these investigations may have an impact on the consumer credit industry in general and therefore on Barclaysthe Group’s business in this sector. In February 2007 the OFT announced that it was expanding its investigation into interchange rates to include debit cards.

In April 2007, the UK consumer interest association known as Which? submitted a super-complaint to the OFT pursuant to the Enterprise Act 2002. The super-complaint criticises the various ways in which credit card companies calculate interest charges on credit card accounts. In June 2007, the OFT announced a new programme of work with the credit card industry and consumer bodies in order to make the costs of credit cards easier for consumers to understand. This OFT decision follows the receipt by the OFT of the super-complaint from Which? This new work will explore the issues surrounding the costs of credit for credit cards including purchases, cash advances, introductory offers and payment allocation. The OFT’s programme of work is expected to take six months.

On 11th February 2008, the OFT announced its recommendations, which include the introduction of an FSA price comparison website, improvements to customer information in summary boxes and the use of standard terminology.

In September 2006, the OFT announced that it had decided to undertake a fact find on the application of its statement on credit card fees made in April 2006 to current account unauthorised overdraft fees. The fact find was completed in March 2007. On 29th March 2007, the OFT announced its decision to conduct a formal investigation into the fairness of bank current account charges. The OFT announcedinitiated a market study into personal current accounts (PCAs) in the UK on 26th April 2007. The market study will look at: (i) whether the provision of ‘free if in credit’ PCAs delivers sufficiently high levels of transparency and value for customers; (ii) the implications for competition and consumers if there were to be a shift away from ‘free if in credit’ PCAs; (iii) the fairness and impact on consumers generally of the incidence, level and consequences of account charges; and (iv) what steps could be taken to improve customers’ ability to secure better value for money, in particular to help customers make more informed current account choices and drive competition. The study willstudy’s focus onwas PCAs but will includeit also included an examination of other retail banking products, in particular savings accounts, credit cards, personal loans and mortgages in order to take into account the competitive dynamics of UK retail banking. On 16th July 2008, the OFT published its market study report, in which it concluded that certain features of the UK PCA market were not working well for consumers. The OFT will publish its interim findings afterreached the test case (see below).

Inprovisional view that some form of regulatory intervention is necessary in the UK PCA market. On 16th July 2007,2008, the OFT commencedalso announced a test caseconsultation to seek views on the findings and possible measures to address the issues raised in its report. The consultation period closed on 31st October 2008. The Group has participated fully in the High Court by agreement with Barclaysmarket study process and seven other financial institutions in which the parties seek declarations on two legal issues arising from the banks’ terms and conditions relatingwill continue to overdraft charges. The test case does not encompass claims from local, medium or larger business customers. The proceedings will run in parallel with the ongoing OFT dual inquiry into unauthorised overdraft charges and PCAs. Please also refer to Note 35.

In January 2007, the FSA issued a statement of good practice relating to mortgage exit administration fees. Barclays agreed to charge the fee applicable at the time the customer took out the mortgage, which was one of the options recommended by the FSA.do so.

US laws and regulations require compliance with US economic sanctions, administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, against designated foreign countries, nationals and others. HM Treasury regulations similarly require compliance with sanctions adopted by the UK government. BarclaysThe Group has been conducting an internal review of its conduct with respect to US dollarDollar payments involving countries, persons orand entities subject to these sanctions and has been reporting to governmental agenciesauthorities about the results of that review. BarclaysThe Group received inquiries relating to these sanctions and certain US dollarDollar payments processed by its New York branch from the New York County District Attorney’s Office and the US Department of Justice, which along with other authorities, has been reported to be conducting investigations of sanctions compliance by non-US financial institutions. BarclaysThe Group has responded to those inquiries and is cooperating with the regulators, the Department of Justice and the District Attorney’s Office in connection with their investigations of Barclays conduct with respect to sanctions compliance. Barclays has also received a formal notice of investigation from the FSA, and has been keeping the FSA informed of the progress of thesethe US investigations and Barclays internal review. Barclays review is ongoing. It is currently not possible to predict the ultimate resolution of the issues covered by Barclays review and the investigations, including the timing and potential financial effectimpact of any resolution, which could be substantial.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme provides compensation to customers of financial institutions in the event that an institution is unable, or is likely to be unable, to pay claims against it. During the year, a number of institutions, including Bradford & Bingley plc, Heritable Bank plc, Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Limited, Landsbanki ‘Icesave’, and London Scottish Bank plc, were declared in default by the FSA. In order to meet its obligations to the depositors of these institutions, the FSCS has borrowed £19.7 billion from HM Treasury, which is on an interest only basis until September 2011. These borrowings are anticipated to be repaid wholly or substantially from the realisation of the assets of the above named institutions. The FSCS raises annual levies from the banking industry to meet its management expenses and compensation costs. Individual institutions make payments based on their level of market participation (in the case of deposits, the proportion that their protected deposits represent of total market protected deposits) at 31st December each year. If an institution is a market participant on this date it is obligated to pay a levy. Barclays does not expect these matters to haveBank PLC was a material adverse effectmarket participant at 31st December 2007 and 2008. The Group has accrued £101m for its share of levies that will be raised by the FSCS including the interest on the financial positionloan from HM Treasury in respect of the Group, butlevy years to 31st March 2010. The accrual includes estimates for the interest FSCS will pay on the loan and estimates of Barclays market participation in the relevant periods. Interest will continue to accrue on the HM Treasury loan to the FSCS until September 2011 and will form part of future FSCS management expenses levies. If the assets of the defaulting institutions are insufficient to repay the HM Treasury loan in 2011, the FSCS will agree a schedule of repayments with HM Treasury, which will be recouped from the industry in the form of additional levies. At the date of these financial statements, it is not possible to estimate whether there will ultimately be additional levies on the industry, the level of Barclays market participation or other factors that may affect the amounts or timing of amounts that may ultimately become payable, nor the effect they mightthat such levies may have upon operating results in any particular financial period.

 

232

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

202


LOGO

LOGO

37 Leasing

The Group is both lessor and lessee under finance and operating leases, providing asset financing for its customers and leasing assets for its own use. In addition, assets leased by the Group may be sublet to other parties. An analysis of the impact of these transactions on the Group balance sheet and income statement is as follows:

(a) As Lessor

Finance lease receivables

The Group specialises in asset-based lending and works with a broad range of international technology, industrial equipment and commercial companies to provide customised finance programmes to assist manufacturers, dealers and distributors of assets.

Finance lease receivables are included within loans and advances to customers.

The Group’s net investment in finance lease receivables was as follows:

 

 2007 2006  2008  2007
 

Gross

investment in

finance lease

receivables

£m

 

Future

        finance

income

£m

 Present value of
minimum lease
payments
receivable
£m
 

   Unguaranteed

residual

values
£m

 

Gross
       investment in
finance lease
receivables

£m

 

Future
            finance
income

£m

 

Present value of

minimum lease

payments

receivable

£m

 

Unguaranteed

residual

values

£m

  Gross
investment in
finance lease
receivables
£m
  Future
finance
income
£m
 

Present value of
minimum lease
payments
receivable

£m

  

Unguaranteed
residual
values

£m

  Gross
investment in
finance lease
receivables
£m
  Future
finance
income
£m
 

Present value of
minimum lease
payments
receivable

£m

  

Unguaranteed
residual
values

£m

Not more than one year 3,657 (780) 2,877 213 3,650 (734) 2,916 166  3,929  (689) 3,240  149  3,657  (780) 2,877  213
Over one year but not more than five years 7,385 (1,613) 5,772 374 5,824 (1,490) 4,334 334  8,668  (1,673) 6,995  355  7,385  (1,613) 5,772  374
Over five years 3,476 (935) 2,541 14 3,790 (898) 2,892 15  3,419  (768) 2,651  25  3,476  (935) 2,541  14

Total

 14,518 (3,328) 11,190 601 13,264 (3,122) 10,142 515  16,016  (3,130) 12,886  529  14,518  (3,328) 11,190  601

The allowance for uncollectable finance lease receivables included in the allowance for impairment amounted to £113m£189m at 31st December 2007 (2006: £99m)2008 (2007: £113m).

Operating lease receivables

The Group acts as lessor, whereby items of plant and equipment are purchased and then leased to third parties under arrangements qualifying as operating leases. The items purchased to satisfy these leases are treated as plant and equipment in the Group’s financial statements and are generally disposed of at the end of the lease term (see Note 23).

The future minimum lease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable operating leases at 31st December 20072008 were as follows:

 

  

2007

Plant and
equipment
£m

  2006
Plant and
equipment
£m
  

2008

Plant and
equipment
£m

  2007
Plant and
equipment
£m

Not more than one year

  29  18  80  29

Over one year but not more than two years

  24  5  42  24

Over two years but not more than three years

  22  3  36  22

Over three years but not more than four years

  20  3  24  20

Over four years but not more than five years

  11  3  13  11

Over five years

  10  7  39  10

Total

  116  39  234  116

(b) As Lessee

Finance lease commitments

The Group leases items of property, plant and equipment on terms that meet the definition of finance leases. Finance lease commitments are included within other liabilities (see Note 25).

Obligations under finance leases were as follows:

 

  2007
Total future
minimum
payments
£m
  2006
Total future
minimum
payments
£m
  2008
Total future
minimum
payments
£m
  2007
Total future
minimum
payments
£m

Not more than one year

  12  6  35  12

Over one year but not more than two years

  14  21  13  14

Over two years but not more than three years

  13  11  14  13

Over three years but not more than four years

  12  14  17  12

Over four years but not more than five years

  15  9  14  15

Over five years

  17  31  3  17

Net obligations under finance leases

  83  92  96  83

 

203 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 233


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

37 Leasing (continued)

(b) As Lessee (continued)

The carrying amount of assets held under finance leases at the balance sheet date was:

 

  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 
  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Cost

  94  44   87  94 

Accumulated depreciation

  (24) (25)  (67) (24)

Net book value

  70  19   20  70 

Operating lease commitments

The Group leases various offices, branches and other premises under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements. The leases have various terms, escalation and renewal rights. There are no contingent rents payable. The Group also leases equipment under non-cancellable lease arrangements.

Where the Group is the lessee the future minimum lease payment under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:

 

  2008  2007
  

 

2007

  2006  Property
£m
  Equipment
£m
  Property
£m
  Equipment
£m
  

 

Property
£m

  Equipment
£m
  Property
£m
  Equipment
£m

Not more than one year

  191  6  335  9  275  5  191  6

Over one year but not more than two years

  396  1  337  9  354  1  396  1

Over two years but not more than three years

  357  1  311  2  334  1  357  1

Over three years but not more than four years

  323    268    315    323  

Over four years but not more than five years

  287    223    465  5  287  

Over five years

  2,225    2,057    2,744  1  2,225  

Total

  3,779  8  3,531  20  4,487  13  3,779  8

The total of future minimum sublease payments to be received under non-cancellable subleases at the balance sheet date is £167m (2006: £251m)£158m (2007: £167m).

38 Disposals

The Group made the following material disposals in 2008:

% DisposalDate

Barclays Life Assurance Limited

10031/10/08

2008

£m

Total disposal consideration

762

Costs associated with disposal

(33)

Net assets disposed

(403)

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries

326

Total disposal consideration

762

Costs associated with disposal

(7)

Repayment of loan on disposal

(386)

Cash and cash equivalents disposed of

(131)

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

238

Cash received in respect of disposal of ownership in BGI UK Holdings Limited through the exercise of options under the BGI EOP scheme

19

Decrease in investment in subsidiaries

19

234

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

39 Acquisitions

The Group made the following material acquisitions in 2007:2008:

        

Acquisition

date

  Gains on
acquisitions
£m
  Goodwill
£m

Lehman Brothers North American businesses

  (a)  22nd September 2008  2,262  

Macquarie Bank Limited residential mortgage businesses

  (b)  6th November 2008  52  

Goldfish credit card UK businesses

  (b)  31st March 2008  92  

Expobank (100% of ordinary shares)

  (c)  1st July 2008    243

Gains on acquisitions

        2,406   

(a) Indexchange Investment AGLehman Brothers North American businesses

On 8th February 2007,22nd September 2008, the Group completed the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American businesses.

The assets and liabilities of Lehman Brothers North American businesses after the acquisition, details of the purchase price and the gain on acquisition arising were as follows:

Fair
values
£m

Assets

Cash and balances at central banks

861

Trading portfolio assets

23,837

Loans and advances to customers

3,642

Available-for-sale financial investments

1,948

Other assets

41

Intangible assetsa

888

Property, plant and equipment

886

Deferred tax asset

229

Total assets

32,332

Liabilities

Customer accounts

2,459

Derivative financial instruments

599

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

24,409

Other liabilities

1,049

Deferred tax liabilities

517

Total liabilities

29,033

Net assets acquired (excludes Obligation to be settled in shares)

3,299

Obligation to be settled in sharesb

(163)

Acquisition cost

Cash paid

834

Attributable costs

40

Total consideration

874

Gain on acquisition

2,262

The acquired assets and liabilities summarised in the table above do not represent the entire balance sheet of Lehman Brothers North American businesses, or of discrete business lines within those operations. For this reason it is not practical to reliably determine the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities in the pre-acquisition books and records of Lehman Brothers.

Notes

aIntangible assets included an amount of £636m relating to customer lists.

bUnder the terms of the acquisition, the Group assumed an obligation to make payments to employees of the acquired business in respect of their pre-acquisition service provided to Lehman Brothers. This amount represents the equity-settled portion of that obligation and is recognised as a component of shareholders’ equity.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

235


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

39 Acquisitions (continued)

Certain assets were received subsequent to the acquisition date, since it was first necessary to agree their status as assets of the Group with the relevant regulators, custodians, trustees, exchanges and bankruptcy courts. Such assets were initially classified within loans and advances. Once they were received, the related receivable was derecognised and the resulting asset recognised within the appropriate balance sheet category. In the table such assets are classified accordingly.

The initial accounting for the acquisition has been determined only provisionally. Any revisions to fair values that result from the conclusion of the acquisition process with respect to assets not yet received by the Group will be recognised as an adjustment to the initial accounting. Any such revisions must be effected within 12 months of the acquisition date and would result in a restatement of the 2008 income statement and balance sheet.

The excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over consideration paid resulted in £2,262m of gain on acquisition.

It is impracticable to disclose the profit or loss of the acquired Lehman Brothers North American businesses since the acquisition date. The acquired business has been integrated into the corresponding existing business lines and there is no reliable basis for allocating post-acquisition results between the acquirer and the acquiree. Similarly, it is impracticable to disclose the revenue and profit or loss of the combined entity as though the acquisition date had been 1st January 2008. Only parts of Lehman Brothers US and Canadian businesses, and specified assets and liabilities, were acquired. There is no reliable basis for identifying the proportion of the pre-acquisition results of Lehman Brothers that relates to the business acquired by the Group.

(b) Macquarie Bank Limited Italian residential mortgage businesses and Goldfish credit card UK businesses

On 6th November 2008, the Group purchased the Italian residential mortgage businesses of Macquarie Bank Limited.

On 31st March 2008, the Group completed the acquisition of Discover’s UK credit card businesses, Goldfish.

The assets and liabilities of Macquarie Bank Limited Italian residential mortgage businesses and Goldfish credit card UK businesses before and after the acquisition, details of the purchase price and gains on acquisitions arising were as follows:

    Macquarie Bank businesses  Goldfish credit card UK businesses
    Carrying value
pre-acquisition
£m
  Fair value
adjustments
£m
  Fair
values
£m
  Carrying value
pre-acquisition
£m
  Fair value
adjustments
£m
  Fair
values
£m

Assets

          

Cash and balances at central banks

  3    3  172    172

Loans and advances to banks

        8    8

Loans and advances to customers

  833  (20) 813  1,900  (34) 1,866

Other assets

        39  (1) 38

Intangible assets

          32  32

Property, plant and equipment

  1    1  39  1  40

Deferred tax asset

          12  12

Total assets

  837  (20)  817  2,158  10  2,168

Liabilities

          

Long- and short-term borrowings

        1,974    1,974

Other liabilities

        55    55

Deferred tax liabilities

          9  9

Total liabilities

        2,029  9  2,038

Net assets acquired

  837  (20)  817  129  1  130

Acquisition cost

          

Cash paid

     765     35

Attributable costs

                3

Total consideration

        765        38

Gains on acquisitions

        52        92

The contribution to the consolidated profit before tax of the acquired businesses in the table above for the period from the acquisition date to 31st December 2008 is £1m loss for Macquarie Bank Limited businesses and £40m profit for the Goldfish credit card UK businesses.

The excess remaining after the reassessment of the acquirees’ identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities which has been recognised within the consolidated income statement as a gain on acquisition is £52m for Macquarie Bank Limited businesses and £92m for Goldfish credit card UK businesses.

236

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

39 Acquisitions (continued)

(c) Expobank

On 1st July 2008, the Group acquired 100% of the ordinary shares of Indexchange Investment AG, based in Munich offering exchange traded fund products.Expobank, a Russian bank.

(b) Equifirst Corporation

On 30th March 2007, the Group acquired 100%The assets and liabilities of the ordinary shares of Equifirst Corporation, a sub-prime mortgage origination business.

(c) Walbrook Group Limited

On 18th May 2007,Russian bank, Expobank before and after the Group acquired 100%acquisition, details of the ordinary shares of Walbrook Group Limited. The business serves high net worth private clientspurchase price and corporate customers.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

204


LOGO

38 Acquisitions (continued)

Details of the net assets of material companies acquired and consideration paidgoodwill arising were as follows:

 

  Carrying value
pre-acquisition £m
  Fair value adjustments £m 2007 £m  

Carrying value

pre-acquisition
£m

  Fair value
adjustments
£m
  Fair
values
£m

Assets

           

Cash and balances at central banks

  51    51  73    73

Assets designated at fair value

  133    133

Goodwill

  41  (41) 

Property, plant and equipment

  7    7

Trading portfolio assets

  52    52

Loans and advances to customers

  446  5  451

Other assets

  19    19  9    9

Intangible assets

    53  53    45  45

Deferred tax assets

  10    10

Property, plant and equipment

  28    28

Total assets

  261  12  273  608  50  658

Liabilities

           

Deposits from banks

  162    162  71    71

Deferred tax liabilities

    4  4

Customer accounts

  318    318

Debt securities in issue

  103    103

Other liabilities

  98  (38) 60  16    16

Total liabilities

  260  (34) 226  508    508

Net assets acquired

      47  100  50  150

Goodwill

      267        243

Total

      314        393

Acquisition cost

      

Cash paid

      386

Attributable costs

        7

Total consideration

        393

The excess of proceeds over the net assets acquired has generated goodwill of £267m, based on the exchange rate at the date of acquisition£243m and is attributable to the operational synergies and earnings potential expected to be realised over the longer term.

In aggregate,The results of the acquired businesses generated abusiness’s operations have been included from 1st July 2008 and contributed £13m loss of (£15m) to the consolidated profit before tax for the period from acquisition date to 31st December 2007.tax.

If all of the above acquisitions had occurred on 1st January 2007 the impact on total Group income and net profit for the year would have been immaterial.

2007
£m

Acquisition cost

Cash paid

297

Deferred consideration

11

Attributable costs

6

Total consideration

314

Cash outflows in respect of acquisitions

The aggregate net outflow of cash from the acquisition of the above Group businesses and entities was as follows:

 

    20072008
£m

Cash paidconsideration on acquisitions

  2972,070 

Cash and cash equivalents acquired

  (511,109)

Net cashCash outflow on acquisition

  246961 

Cash paid in respect of acquisition of shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited

  488157 

Cash paid in respect of acquisition of shares in Absa Bank Limited

180

Increase in investment in subsidiaries

  668157 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

237


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

3940 Investment in subsidiaries

The investment in Barclays Bank PLC is stated in the balance sheet of Barclays PLC at a cost of £10,186m (2006: £8,641m)£15,340m (2007: £10,186m). The increase of £1,545m (2006: £179m)£5,154m (2007: £1,545m) during the year represents the cost of additional shares of £111m (2006: £179m)£16m (2007: £111m), capital contributions of £4,362m (2007: £1,434m), and a non-cash capital contribution of £1,434m (2006: £nil).£776m.

The investment in Barclays Investments (Netherlands) N.V. iswas liquidated in September 2008. The investment was stated in the balance sheet of Barclays PLC at a cost of £205m (2006: £nil). The increase of £205m (2006: £nil) during the year represents the cost of the initial share issue.in 2007.

The investment in Odysseus Jersey (No. 1) Limited iswas liquidated in September 2008. The investment was stated in the balance sheet of Barclays PLC at a cost of £0.1m (2006: £nil). The increase of £0.1m (2006: £nil) during the year represents the cost of the initial share issue.

205

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accountsin 2007.

For the year ended 31st December 2007

4041 Principal subsidiaries

 

Country of registration
or incorporation
  Company name  Nature of business  Percentage
of equity
capital held
%
 

Botswana

  

Barclays Bank of Botswana Limited

  

Banking

  74.9 

Egypt

  

Barclays Bank Egypt SAE

  

Banking

  100 

England

  

Barclays Bank PLC

  

Banking, holding company

  100*

England

  

Barclays Mercantile Business Finance Limited

  

Loans and advances including leases to customers

  100*

England

  

Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited

  

Holding company

  94.195.5 

England

  

Barclays Global Investors Limited

  

Investment management

  94.195.5*

England

  

Barclays Life AssuranceBank Trust Company Limited

  Life assurance

Banking, securities industries and trust services

100*

England

Barclays Stockbrokers Limited

Stockbroking

100*

England

Barclays Capital Securities Limited

Securities dealing

100*

England

Barclays Global Investors Pensions Management Limited

Investment management

95.5*

England

FIRSTPLUS Financial Group PLC

Secured loan provider

  100 

England

  Barclays Bank Trust Company LimitedBanking, securities industries and trust services100

England

Barclays Stockbrokers LimitedStockbroking100

England

Barclays Capital Securities LimitedSecurities dealing100

England

Barclays Global Investors Pensions Management LimitedInvestment management94.1*

England

FIRSTPLUS Financial Group PLCSecured loan provider100

England

Gerrard Investment Management Limited

  

Investment management

  100*

Ghana

  

Barclays Bank of Ghana Limited

  

Banking

  100 

Ireland

  

Barclays Insurance (Dublin) Limited

  

Insurance provider

  100*

Ireland

  

Barclays Assurance (Dublin) Limited

  

Insurance provider

  100*

Isle of Man

  

Barclays Private Clients International Limiteda

  

Banking

  100*

Japan

  

Barclays Capital Japan Limited

  

Securities dealing

  100*

Jersey

  

Barclays Private Bank & Trust Limited

  

Banking, trust company

  100*

Kenya

  

Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited

  

Banking

  68.5 

Russia

Barclays Bank LLC

Banking

100*

South Africa

  

Absa Group Limited

  

Banking

  58.858.6 

Spain

  

Barclays Bank SA

  

Banking

  99.7 

Switzerland

  

Barclays Bank (Suisse) S.A.

  

Banking and trust services

100

USA

Barclays Capital Inc.

Securities dealing

  100*

USA

  

Barclays Capital Inc.Financial Corporation

  Securities dealing

Holding company for US credit card issuer

  100*

USA

  

Barclays Financial CorporationGlobal Investors, National Association

  Holding company for US credit card issuer

Investment management and securities industry

  10095.5*

USA

  

Barclays Global Investors, National AssociationGroup USA Inc.

  Investment management and securities industry

Holding company

  94.1100*

Zimbabwe

  

Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited

  

Banking

  67.8*

In accordance with Section 231(5) of the Companies Act 1985, the above information is provided solely in relation to principal subsidiaries.

The country of registration or incorporation is also the principal area of operation of each of the above subsidiaries. Investments in these subsidiaries are held directly by Barclays Bank PLC except where marked *.

Full information of all subsidiaries will be included in the Annual Return to be filed at Companies House.

Note

aBBPLC is the beneficial owner of 38.1% of shares and Barclays Holdings (Isle of Man) Limited is the beneficial owner of 61.9% of shares.

 

238

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

206


LOGO

LOGO

4142 Other entities

There are a number of entities that do not qualify as subsidiaries under UK Law but which are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the Group and the entity (usually a Special Purpose Entity (SPE)) indicates that the entity is controlled by the Group. Such entities are deemed to be controlled by the Group when relationships with such entities gives rise to benefits that are in substance no different from those that would arise were the entity a subsidiary.

The consolidation of such entities may be appropriate in a number of situations, but primarily when:

 

- 

the operating and financial policespolicies of the entity are closely defined from the outset (i.e. it operates on an ‘autopilot’ basis) with such policies being largely determined by the Group;

 

- 

the Group has rights to obtain the majority of the benefits of the entity and/or retains the majority of the residual or ownership risks related to the entity; or

 

- 

the activities of the entity are being conducted largely on behalf of the Group according to its specific business objectives.

Such entities are created for a variety of purposes including securitisation, structuring, asset realisation, intermediation and management.

Entities may have a different reporting date from that of the parent of 31st December. Dates may differ for a variety of reasons including local reporting regulations or tax laws. In accordance with our accounting policies, for the purpose of inclusion in the consolidated financial statements of Barclays PLC, entities with different reporting dates are made up until 31st December.

Entities may have restrictions placed on their ability to transfer funds, including payment of dividends and repayment of loans, to their parent entity. Reasons for the restrictions include:

 

- 

Central bank restrictions relating to local exchange control laws.

 

- 

Central bank capital adequacy requirements.

 

- 

Company law restrictions relating to treatment of the entities as going concerns.

Although the Group’s interest in the equity voting rights in certain entities exceeds 50%, or it may have the power to appoint a majority of their Boards of Directors, they are excluded from consolidation because the Group either does not direct the financial and operating policies of these entities, or on the grounds that another entity has a superior economic interest in them. Consequently, these entities are not deemed to be controlled by Barclays.

The table below includes information in relation to such entities as required by the Companies Act 1985, Section 231(5).

 

Country of registration
or incorporation

  Name  Percentage of
ordinary share
capital held
%
  Equity
share-
holders’
funds
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Retained

profit for

the year

£m

  Name  

Percentage of
ordinary share
capital held

%

  Equity
share-
holders’
funds
£m
 Retained
loss for
the year
£m
 

UK

  Oak Dedicated Limited  100  (3) 4  

Oak Dedicated Limited

  100  (4) (1)

UK

  Oak Dedicated Two Limited  100  (3) 2  

Oak Dedicated Two Limited

  100  (4)  

UK

  Oak Dedicated Three Limited  100  1  1  

Oak Dedicated Three Limited

  100  1   

UK

  Fitzroy Finance Limited  100      

Fitzroy Finance Limited

  100     

Cayman Islands

  St James Fleet Investments Two Limited  100  2    

St James Fleet Investments Two Limited

  100  2   

Cayman Islands

  BNY BT NewCo Limited        

BNY BT NewCo Limited

       

 

207 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 239


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4243 Related party transactions and Directors’ remuneration

(a) Related party transactions

Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operation decisions, or one other party controls both. The definition includes subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and the Group’s pension schemes, as well as other persons.

Subsidiaries

Transactions between Barclays PLC and subsidiaries also meet the definition of related party transactions. Where these are eliminated on consolidation, they are not disclosed in the Group financial statements. Transactions between Barclays PLC and its subsidiary, Barclays Bank PLC are fully disclosed directly in its balance sheet and income statement. A list of the Group’s principal subsidiaries is shown in Note 40.41.

Associates, joint ventures and other entities

The Group provides banking services to its associates, joint ventures, and the Group pension funds (principally the UK Retirement Fund), and to entities under common directorships, providing loans, overdrafts, interest and non-interest bearing deposits and current accounts to these entities as well as other services. Group companies, principally within Barclays Global Investors, also provide investment management and custodian services to the Group pension schemes. The Group also provides banking services for unit trusts and investment funds managed by Group companies and are not individually material. All of these transactions are conducted on the same terms as third-party transactions.

Amounts included in the accounts, in aggregate, by category of related party entity are as follows:

 

  For the year ended and as at 31st December 2007   For the year ended and as at 31st December 2008 
      Associates
£m
 
 
 Joint
         ventures
£m
 
 
 
 Entities
under
common
directorships
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Pension
funds unit
trusts and
    investment
funds
£m
               Total
£m
 
 
  Associates
£m
 Joint
ventures
£m
 Entities
under
common
directorships
£m
  

Pension
funds unit
trusts and
investment
funds

£m

 Total
£m
 

Income statement:

              

Interest received

  5  75  1    81     105  3    108 

Interest paid

  (1) (58) (1)   (60)    (73)     (73)
Fees received for services rendered (including investment management and custody and commissions)  1  34    26  61     15    5  20 

Fees paid for services provided

  (52) (78)     (130)  (44) (146)     (190)

Principal transactions

  (24) 47  (16)   7   8  59  60  (25) 102 

Assets:

              

Loans and advances to banks and customers

  142  886  40    1,068   110  954  34    1,098 

Derivative transactions

    4  36    40     9  311  15  335 

Other assets

  19  18    14  51   67  276    3  346 

Liabilities:

              

Deposits from banks

  11        11     592      592 

Customer accounts

    61  33  12  106     167  74  10  251 

Derivative transactions

    10  50    60       111  41  152 

Other liabilities

  4  125      129   3  18    28  49 

 

240

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

208


LOGO

LOGO

4243 Related party transactions and Directors’ remuneration (continued)

 

  For the year ended and as at 31st December 2007a 
  For the year ended and as at 31st December 2006   Associates
£m
 Joint
ventures
£m
 

Entities
under
common
directorships

£m

 

Pension
funds unit
trusts and
investment
funds

£m

  Total
£m
 
    Associates
£m
 
 
 Joint

     ventures

£m

 

 

 

 Entities
under
common
directorships
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Pension
funds unit
trusts and
investment
funds

£m

 
 
 
 
 

 

         Total
£m
 
 

Income statement:

             

Interest received

  45  38    2  85   5  88  1    94 

Interest paid

  (31) (57)     (88)  (1) (58) (1)   (60)

Fees received for services rendered (including investment management and

custody and commissions)

  14  7    28  49   1  34    26  61 

Fees paid for services provided

  (115) (51)   (1) (167)  (52) (78)     (130)

Principal transactions

  3    (2)   1   (27) 45  (16)   2 

Assets:

             

Loans and advances to banks and customers

  784  146  65    995   142  1,285  40    1,467 

Derivative transactions

               4  36    40 

Other assets

  19  3    17  39   213  106    14  333 

Liabilities:

             

Deposits from banks

  9      3  12   11        11 

Customer accounts

  19  18  5  34  76     61  33  12  106 

Derivative transactions

      2    2     10  50    60 

Other liabilities

  13  8      21   4  125      129 

 

  For the year ended and as at 31st December 2006a 
  For the year ended and as at 31st December 2005   Associates
£m
 Joint
ventures
£m
 Entities
under
common
directorships
£m
 

Pension
funds unit
trusts and
investment
funds

£m

 Total
£m
 
    Associates

£m

 

 

 Joint

     ventures

£m

 

 

 

 Entities

under

common

directorships

£m

  Pension

funds unit

trusts and

investment

funds

£m

          Total

£m

 

 

Income statement:

              

Interest received

  23  14      37   45  38    2  85 

Interest paid

  (37) (45)     (82)  (31) (57)     (88)

Fees received for services rendered (including investment management and

custody and commissions)

  5  7    17  29   14  7    28  49 

Fees paid for services provided

  (120) (34)     (154)  (115) (51)   (1) (167)

Principal transactions

  33      1  34   3    (2)   1 

Assets:

              

Loans and advances to banks and customers

  632  19      651   784  146  65    995 

Derivative transactions

  36        36            

Other assets

  26  1    19  46   19  3    17  39 

Liabilities:

              

Deposits from banks

  827        827   9      3  12 

Customer accounts

  13  22    501  536   19  18  5  34  76 

Derivative transactions

  1        1       2    2 

Other liabilities

  22  6      28   13  8      21 

No guarantees, pledges or commitments have been given or received in respect of these transactions in 2008, 2007 2006 or 2005.

There are no leasing transactions between related parties for 2007, 2006 or 2005.2006.

Derivatives transacted on behalf of the Pensions Funds Unit Trusts and Investment Funds amounted to £318m (2007: £22m, (2006: £1,209m, 2005: £280m)2006: £1,209m).

In 20072008 Barclays paid £18m (2006: £19m)£12m (2007: £18m) of its charitable donations through the Charities Aid Foundation, a registered charitable organisation, in which a Director of the Company is a Trustee.

Note

aThe amounts reported in prior periods have been restated to reflect new related parties.

 

209 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 241


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4243 Related party transactions and Directors’ remuneration (continued)

Key Management Personnel

The Group’s Key Management Personnel, and persons connected with them, are also considered to be related parties for disclosure purposes. Key Management Personnel are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of Barclays PLC (directly or indirectly) and comprise the Directors of Barclays PLC and the Officers of the Group, certain direct reports of the Group Chief Executive and the heads of major business units.

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans to companies where a Director or other member of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) is also a Director or other member of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) of Barclays. These loans are made on substantially the same criteria and terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features.

There were no material related party transactions with companies where a Director or other member of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) is also a Director or other member of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) of Barclays.

The Group provides banking services to Directors and other Key Management Personnel and persons connected to them. Transactions during the year and the balances outstanding at 31st December 20072008 were as follows:

 

    Directors, other Key

Management Personnel

and connected persons

 

 

 

         2007

£m

 

 

    2006

£m

 

 

  2005

£m

 

 

Loans outstanding at 1st January

    7.8   7.4   7.8 

Loans issued during the year

    2.7   2.7   3.4 

Loan repayments during the year

 

    (3.2)  (2.3)  (3.2)

 

Loans outstanding at 31st December

 

    7.3   7.8   8.0 

 

Interest income earned

 

    0.4   0.3   0.4 

No allowances for impairment were recognised in respect of loans to Directors or other members of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) in 2007, 2006 or 2005.

  Directors, other Key
Management Personnel
and connected persons
 
  2008
£m
 
 
 2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 

Loans outstanding at 1st January

  7.4  7.8  7.4 

Loans issued during the year

  6.9  2.7  2.7 

Loan repayments during the year

  (5.5) (3.2) (2.3)

Loans outstanding at 31st December

  8.8  7.3  7.8 

Interest income earned

  0.4  0.4  0.3 

No allowances for impairment were recognised in respect of loans to Directors or other members of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) in 2008, 2007 or 2006.

No allowances for impairment were recognised in respect of loans to Directors or other members of Key Management Personnel (or any connected person) in 2008, 2007 or 2006.

  

    2007
£m
 
 
  2006
£m
 
 
  2005
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Deposits outstanding at 1st January

    15.0   4.7   2.5   8.9  15.0  4.7 

Deposits received during the year

    114.4   105.2   20.4   235.7  114.4  105.2 

Deposits repaid during the year

    (115.0)  (94.8)  (18.2)  (221.9) (115.0) (94.8)

Deposits outstanding at 31st December

    14.4   15.1   4.7   22.7  14.4  15.1 

Interest expense on deposits

    0.6   0.2   0.1   0.5  0.6  0.2 

Of the loans outstanding above, £1.6m (2007: £nil, (2006: £nil, 2005: £0.7m)2006: £nil) relates to Directors and other Key Management Personnel (and persons connected to them) that left the Group during the year. Of the deposits outstanding above, £6.1m (2007: £2.8m, (2006: £0.1m, 2005: £nil)2006: £0.1m) related to Directors and other Key Management Personnel (and persons connected to them) that left the Group during the year.

All loans are provided on normal commercial terms to Directors and other Key Management Personnel (and persons connected to them), with the exception of £1,540 of loans which are provided to non-Director members of Key Management Personnel on staff preferential interest rates (5%) and £665£692 of loans which are provided on an interest free basis.

The loans of £1,540 provided at staff preferential rates of interest reflects the amortized principal amount of a home mortgage loan that was provided by Barclays to a non-Director member of key management personnel. The home mortgage loan was granted at a time when Barclays had in place a corporate policy of providing home mortgage loans at preferential rates of interest to all staff members. This policy has since been discontinued by Barclays. These home mortgage loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, to all staff members, who applied for such loans. The loans of £665£692 provided on an interest free basis relate to the granting of loans to one non-Director member of Barclays key management to purchase commuter rail tickets. The commuter rail ticket loans are still provided to all Barclays staff members upon request on the same terms.

All loans to Directors and other key management personnel (a) were made in the ordinary course of business, (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with other persons and (c) did not involve more than a normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features.

 

242

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

210


LOGO

LOGO

4243 Related party transactions and Directors’ remuneration(continued)

Remuneration of Directors and other Key Management Personnel

 

   Directors, other Key Management
Personnel and connected persons
   2007

£m

  2006

£m

  2005

£m

 

Salaries and other short-term benefits

  23.7  34.2  32.9

Pension costs

  1.1  0.8  1.1

Other long-term benefits

  9.2  9.3  21.5

Termination benefits

    1.4  1.5

Share-based payments

  31.7  27.2  25.3

Employer social security charges on emoluments

  7.8  10.0  10.4
   73.5  82.9  92.7
(b) Disclosure required by the Companies Act 1985      
The following information is presented in accordance with the Companies Act 1985:      

Directors’ remuneration

      
      2007
£m
  2006
£m

Aggregate emoluments

    29.2  32.0

Gains made on the exercise of share options

    0.3  5.5

Amounts paid under long-term incentive schemes

      
Actual pension contributions to money purchase scheme (2007: one Director, £10,233 and 2006: one Director, £11,414)      
Notional pension contributions to money purchase scheme (2007: no Directors and 2006: no Directors)       
      29.5  37.5
    

 

Directors, other Key Management
Personnel and connected persons

    

 

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Salaries and other short-term benefits

  10.7  23.7  34.2

Pension costs

  0.9  1.1  0.8

Other long-term benefits

  1.6  9.2  9.3

Termination benefits

      1.4

Share-based payments

  11.8  31.7  27.2

Employer social security charges on emoluments

  2.7  7.8  10.0
   

 

27.7

  73.5  82.9

(b) Disclosure required by the Companies Act 1985

The following information is presented in accordance with the Companies Act 1985:

Directors’ remuneration

    

 

2008
£m

  2007
£m

Aggregate emoluments

  6.0  29.2

Gains made on the exercise of share options

    0.3

Amounts paid under long-term incentive schemes

  7.4  

Actual pension contributions to money purchase scheme (2008: one Director, £11,745 and 2007: one Director, £10,233)

    

Notional pension contributions to money purchase scheme (2008: no Directors and 2007: no Directors)

    
   

 

13.4

  29.5

As at 31st December 2007, three2008, two Directors were accruing retirement benefits under a defined benefit scheme (2006: four(2007: three Directors).

Two Directors (Naguib Kheraj and FritsOne Director (Frits Seegers) agreed to waive theirhis fees as non-executive DirectorsDirector of Absa Group Limited and Absa Bank Limited. The respectivefees for 2008 were ZAR 0.4m (£0.03m). The fees for 2007 were ZAR 0.1m (£0.01m) and ZAR 0.5m (£0.03m). The fees for 2006 were ZAR 0.4m (£ 0.03m) for Naguib Kheraj and ZAR 0.1m (£ 0.01m) for Frits Seegers. In both 20062007 and 20072008 the fees were paid to Barclays.

Directors’ and Officers’ shareholdings and options

The beneficial ownership of the ordinary share capital of Barclays PLC by all Directors and Officers of Barclays PLC (involving 2120 persons) and Barclays Bank PLC (involving 2221 persons) at 31st December 20072008 amounted to 5,774,2198,036,962 ordinary shares of 25p each (0.09%(0.10% of the ordinary share capital outstanding) and 5,776,3708,037,498 ordinary shares of 25p each (0.09%(0.10% of the ordinary share capital outstanding), respectively.

Executive Directors and Officers of Barclays PLC as a group (involving 108 persons) held, at 31st December 2007,2008, options to purchase 3,097,7622,185,380 Barclays PLC ordinary shares of 25p each at prices ranging from 373p255p to 510p under Sharesave and at 397p under the Executive Share Option Scheme and ranging from 326p317p to 534p under the Incentive Share Option Plan, respectively.

Contracts with Directors (and their connected persons) and Managers

The aggregate amounts outstanding at 31st December 20072008 under transactions, arrangements and agreements made by banking companies within the Group for persons who are, or were during the year, Directors of Barclays PLC and persons connected with them, as defined in the Companies Act 2006, and for Managers, within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, of Barclays Bank PLC were:

 

  Number of
Directors or
Managers
  Number of
connected
persons
  Amount
£m
  

 

Number of
Directors or
Managers

  Number of
connected
persons
  Amount
£m

Directors

            

Loans

  2  5  2.1  1  1  6.1

Quasi-loans and credit card accounts

  12  18    8  1  

Managers

            

Loans

  12  n/a  13.2  3  n/a  14.0

Quasi-loans and credit card accounts

  11  n/a    7  n/a  

(c) US disclosures

For US disclosure purposes, the aggregate emoluments of all Directors and Officers of Barclays PLC who held office during the year (2007:(2008: 24 persons, 2007: 22 persons, 2006: 24 persons, 2005: 25 persons) for the year ended 31st December 20072008 amounted to £26.8m (2007: £64.6m, (2006: £72.1m, 2005: £75.2m)2006: £72.1m). In addition, the aggregate amount set aside for the year ended 31st December 2007,2008, to provide pension benefits for the Directors and Officers amounted to £0.9m (2007: £1.1m, (2006: £0.8m, 2005: £0.2m)2006: £0.8m). The aggregate emoluments of all Directors and Officers of Barclays Bank PLC who held office during the year (2007:(2008: 25 persons, 2007: 23 persons, 2006: 25 persons, 2005: 26 persons) for the year ended 31st December 20072008 amounted to £26.9m, (2007: £64.9m (2006: £72.2m, 2005: £75.4m)and 2006: £72.2m). In addition, the aggregate amount set aside by the Bank and its subsidiaries for the year ended 31st December 2007,2008, to provide pension benefits for the Directors and Officers amounted to £0.9m (2007: £1.1m, (2006: £0.8m, 2005: £0.2m)2006: £0.8m).

 

211 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 243


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4344 Events after the balance sheet date

On 3rd March2nd February 2009, Barclays completed the acquisition of PT Bank Akita, which was announced initially on 17th September 2008, Barclays entered into an agreement with Petropavlovsk Finance (Limited Liability Society) to acquire 100%following the approval of the RussianCentral Bank Expobank, for a consideration of approximately $745m (£373m). The transaction is expectedIndonesia.

On 17th February 2009, Barclays announced that Barclays Capital will discontinue operations at its Equifirst subsidiary due to close in summer 2008 after receiptthe market environment and strategic direction of appropriate regulatory approvals. Expobank focuses principally on Western Russia, with a substantial presence in Moscow and St Petersburg. Founded in 1994, it has grown rapidly and comprises a blend of retail and commercial banking, operating 32 branches and dealing with a range of corporate and wholesale clients. As at 31st December 2007, Expobank had net assets of $186m (£93m).the Group.

4445 Share-based payments

The Group operates share schemes for employees throughout the world. The main current schemes are:

Sharesave

Eligible employees in the UK, Spain and Ireland may participate in the Barclays Sharesave scheme. Under this scheme, employees may enter into contracts to save up to £250 per month (Ireland:320,500, Spain:90)135) and, at the expiry of a fixed term of three, five or seven years (Spain: three years), have the option to use these savings to acquire shares in the Company at a discount, calculated in accordance with the rules of the scheme. The discount is currently 20% of the market price at the date the options are granted. Participants in the scheme have six months from the date of vest in which the option can be exercised.

Sharepurchase

Sharepurchase was introduced in January 2002. It is an HM Revenue & Customs approved all-employee share plan. The plan is open to all eligible UK employees, including executive Directors. Under the plan, participants are able to purchase up to £1,500 worth of Barclays PLC ordinary shares per tax year, which, if kept in trust for five years, can be withdrawn from the plan tax-free. Matching shares were introduced to the scheme during 2005 where the purchase of Barclays shares by the participant are matched equally by the Company up to a value of £600 per tax year. Any shares in the plan will earn dividends in the form of additional shares, which must normally be held by the trustee for three years before being eligible for release.

Executive Share Award Scheme (ESAS)

For certain employees of the Group an element of their annual bonus is in the form of a deferred award of a provisional allocation of Barclays PLC shares under ESAS. The total value of the bonus made to the employee of which ESAS is an element is dependent upon the business unit, Group and individual employee performance. The ESAS element of the annual bonus must normally be held for at least three years. Additional bonus shares are subsequently awarded to recipients of the provisional allocation and vest upon achieving continued service for three and five years from the date of award. ESAS awards are also made to eligible employees for recruitment purposes. All awards are subject to potential forfeit if the individual resigns and commences work with a competitor business.

Performance Share Plan (PSP)

The Performance Share Plan (PSP) was approved by shareholders at the 2005 AGM to replace the ISOP scheme. Performance shares are ‘free’ Barclays shares for which no exercise price is payable and which qualify for dividends. Performance share awards are communicated to participants as an initial allocation. Barclays performance over a three-year period determines the final number of shares that may be released to participants.

Incentive Share Plan (Incentive Shares)

The Incentive Share Plan (Incentive Shares) was introduced in March 2008. Incentive Shares are granted to participants in the form of a provisional allocation of Barclays shares which vest upon achieving continued service after three years. Participants do not pay to receive an award or to receive a release of shares. Incentive Shares qualify for dividends.

Options granted under the following schemes are over subsidiaries of Barclays PLC:

Absa Group Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Transaction (BEE)

On 25th June 2004, Absa shareholders approved the allocation of 73,152,300, redeemable cumulative option-holding Absa preference shares to Batho Bonke Capital Limited. Each redeemable preference share carries the option to acquire one Absa ordinary share. The shares carry the same rights as ordinary shares including voting rights, and receive dividends which are payable semi-annually. Options vested immediately on date of issue and lapse after five years from the date of issue. Exercise may occur in lots of 100 only and within a price range varying from R48 to R69 (£3.16–£4.55) dependent on the 30-day volume weighted trading price on the JSE Limited. Options are redeemed by Absa on the final exercise date.

244

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

45 Share-based payments(continued)

Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust (AGLSIT)

In terms of the rules of Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust, the maximum number of shares which may be issued or transferred and/or in respect of which options may be granted to the participants shall be limited to shares representing 10% of the total number of issued shares from time to time. This is an equity-settled share-based payment arrangement and options are allocated to Absa employees according to the normal human resources talent management processes. The options issued up to August 2005 had no performance criteria linked to them and vested in equal tranches after three, four and five years respectively. No dividends accrue to the option holder over the vesting period. The options expire after a period of ten years from the issuing date. Options issued since August 2005 have performance criteria associated with them, which require headline earnings per share to exceed an agreed benchmark over a three-year period from the grant date for the options to vest. Participants need to be in the employ of Absa at the vesting date in order to be entitled to the options.

Absa Group Limited Share Ownership Administrative Trust (AGLSOT)

AGLSOT enabled all Absa employees to participate in a one-off offer to purchase 200 redeemable cumulative option-holding preference shares. Each redeemable preference share carries the option to acquire one Absa ordinary share. Options vest after three years and lapse after five years from the date of issue. Exercise may occur in lots of 100 only and within a price range varying from R48 to R69 (£3.16–£4.55) dependent on the 30-day volume weighted trading price on the JSE Limited. Options are redeemed by Absa on the final exercise date.

Absa Group Limited Executive Share Award Scheme (AGLESAS)

The ESAS is an equity-settled share-based payment arrangement, where the participant’s notional bonus comprises a number of restricted nil-cost options, based on the allocation price of ordinary shares. Such an initial allocation is held in trust or in the name of the participant. If the participant is in the employ of the Group after the three-year vesting period, the participant will receive 20% matched shares. If the bonus award remains in the ESAS for another two years, the participant receives another 10% matched shares. Dividend shares are paid to participants on the ordinary shares as if the shares were held from inception. The number of dividend shares awarded is therefore calculated on the initial allocation and on the 20% and/or 10% matched shares, over the three- or five-year period. Employees that receive a performance bonus in excess of a predetermined amount were compelled to place a set percentage of their bonus award into the ESAS. Employees also had the option of utilising more of their bonus award for voluntary ESAS options.

In addition, options remain outstanding under the following closed schemes:

Barclays Global Investors Equity Ownership Plan (BGI EOP)

The Equity Ownership Plan extendswas extended to key employees of BGI. The exercise price of the options iswas determined by the Remuneration Committee of Barclays PLC based on the fair value of BGI as determined by an independent appraiser. The options arewere granted over shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited, a subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC.

Options are not exercisable until vesting, with a third of the options held generally becoming exercisable at each anniversary of grant. The shareholder has the right to offer to sell the shares to Barclays Bank PLC 355 days following the exercise of the option. Barclays Bank PLC may accept the offer and purchase the shares at the most recently agreed valuation but is under no obligation to do so. Options lapse ten years after grant. The most recently agreed valuation was £106.03£87.22, at 30th June 2007.

Absa Group Limited Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) Transaction

On 25th June 2004, Absa shareholders approved the allocation of 73,152,300, redeemable cumulative option-holding Absa preference shares to Batho Bonke Capital Limited. Each redeemable preference share carries the option to acquire one Absa ordinary share. The shares carry the same rights as ordinary shares including voting rights, and receive dividends which are payable semi-annually. Options vest after three years and lapse after five years from the date of issue. Exercise may only occur in lots of 100 and within a price range varying from ZAR48 to ZAR69 (£3.40-£4.89) dependent on the 30-day volume weighted trading price on the JSE Limited. Options are redeemed by Absa on the final exercise date.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

212


LOGO

44 Share-based payments (continued)

Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust (AGLSIT)

In terms of the rules of Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust the maximum number of shares which may be issued or transferred and/or in respect of which options may be granted to the participants shall be limited to shares representing 10% of the total number of issued shares. Options are allocated to Absa employees according to the normal Human Resources talent management process. The options issued up to August 2005 had no performance criteria linked to them and vested in equal tranches after three, four and five years respectively.31st March 2008. No dividends accrue to the option holder over the period. The options expire after a period of ten years from the issuing date. Options issued since August 2005 have vesting performance criteria associated with them, which require headline earnings per share to exceed an agreed benchmark over a three-year period from July 2005 for the options to vest

Absa Group Limited Share Ownership Trust (AGLSOT)

The Absa Group Limited Share Ownership Trust (AGLSOT) enabled all Absa employees to participate in a one-off offer to purchase 200 redeemable cumulative option-holding preference shares. Each redeemable preference share carries the option to acquire one Absa ordinary share. Options vest after three years and lapse after five years from the date of issue. Exercise may only occur in lots of 100 and within a price range varying from ZAR48 to ZAR69 (£3.40-£4.89) dependent on the 30-day volume weighted trading price on the JSE Limited. Options are redeemed by Absa on the final exercise date.

Absa Group Limited Executive Share Award Scheme (AGLESAS)

For certain employees of Absa an element of their annual bonus is in the form of a deferred award of a provisional allocation of Absa Group Limited shares under Absa ESAS. The total value of the bonusawards were made to the employee of which ESAS is an element is dependent upon the business unit and individual employee performance. The ESAS element of the annual bonus must be held for at least three years. Additional bonus shares are subsequently awarded to recipients of the provisional allocation and vest upon achieving continued service for three and five years from the date of award. All awards are subject to potential forfeit if the individual resigns.

In addition, options remain outstanding under the following closed schemes:BGI EOP in 2008.

Incentive Share Option Plan (ISOP)

The ISOP was open by invitation to the employees and Directors of Barclays PLC. Options were granted at the market price at the date of grant calculated in accordance with the rules of the plan, and are normally exercisable between three and ten years from that date. The final number of shares over which the option may be exercised is determined by reference to set performance criteria. The number of shares under option represents the maximum possible number that may be exercised. No awards were made under ISOP during 2006 or 2007.2008.

Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS)

The ESOS is a long-term incentive scheme and was available by invitation to certain senior executives of the Group with grants usually made annually. Options were issued with an exercise price equivalent to the market price at the date of the grant without any discount, calculated in accordance with the rules of the scheme, and are normally exercisable between three and ten years from that date. No further awards are made under ESOS.

Woolwich Executive Share Option Plan (Woolwich ESOP)

Options originally granted over Woolwich PLC shares at market value were exercised in 2001 or exchanged, in accordance with the proposals made under the offer to acquire the Woolwich, for options over Barclays PLC shares. Under the rules of ESOP, the performance conditions attached to the exercise of options were disapplied on acquisition of Woolwich PLC by Barclays. Options lapse ten years after grant.

At the balance sheet date no options remained outstanding or exercisable in respect of the following closed scheme:

Woolwich Save as You Earn (Woolwich SAYE)

Under this scheme, employees entered into contracts to save up to £250 per month and, at the expiry of a fixed term of three, five, or seven years, have the option to use these savings to acquire the shares in the Company at a discount calculated in accordance with the rules of the scheme. The discount was 20% of the market price at the date the options were granted.

At the balance sheet date the following cash settledcash-settled schemes operated within the group:

Barclays Africa Share Plan

The Barclays Africa Share Plan grants a number of notional shares and settles in a cash award linked to the Barclays PLC share price. The exercise price of options is equal to the increment of the market price of Barclays shares over the original price on the date of grant. The final number of notional shares over which the option may be exercised is determined by reference to set performance criteria. Awards vest three years from grant and expire four years from that date.Group:

Absa Group Limited Phantom Performance Share Plan (Absa Phantom(Phantom PSP)

The Absa Phantom PSP was implemented during 2006is a cash-settled plan and payments made to replaceparticipants in respect of their awards are in the Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust (AGLSIT) scheme. Sharesform of cash. The Phantom PSP shares (and any associated notional dividend shares) are awarded at no cost to participants and the cashparticipants. The amount that is ultimately paid to the participants is equal to the market value of a number of ordinary shares as determined after a three-year vesting period. The vesting of Absa Group Limited. Thethe Phantom PSP awards will be subject to two non-market performance of Absaconditions which will be measured over a three-year period, determinesstarting on the final numberfirst day of notional shares that any cash payment would be based on. Awardsthe financial year in which the award is made. The award will vest after three years to the extent that the performance conditions are satisfied. These awards are forfeited in total if Absa performance fails to meet the minimum criteria

Absa Group Limited Phantom Executive Share Award Scheme (Phantom ESAS)

The Phantom ESAS is a cash-settled share-based payment arrangement, where the participant’s notional bonus comprises a number of restricted nil-cost options, based on the allocation price of ordinary shares. If the participant is in the employ of the Group after the three-year vesting period, the participant will receive 20% bonus phantom shares. If the bonus award remains in the Phantom ESAS for another two years, the participant receives an additional 10% bonus phantom shares. Dividend phantom shares are paid to participants on the ordinary phantom shares as if the shares were held from inception. The number of dividend phantom shares awarded is therefore calculated on the initial allocation and on the 20% and 10% bonus phantom shares, over the five-year period. Employees that receive performance bonuses in excess of a predetermined amount are compelled to place a set percentage of the bonus award in the Phantom ESAS. Employees also have the option of utilising more of their bonus award for voluntary ESAS phantom shares.

 

213 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 245


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4445 Share-based payments(continued)

The weighted average fair value per option granted during the year is as follows:

 

  2007
£
  2006
£
  2008
£
  

2007

£

Sharesave

  1.25  1.88  0.92  1.25

Sharepurchase

  6.84  6.55  3.38  6.84

ISP

  4.22  n/a

ESAS

  6.96  6.73  4.09  6.96

PSP

  8.03  7.53  4.89  8.03

BGI EOP

  22.18  21.18  n/a  22.18

AGLSIT

  3.18  2.70  n/a  3.18

AGLESAS

  n/a  8.42  7.17  n/a

Fair values for Sharesave, PSP, , BGI EOP and AGLSIT are calculated at the date of grant using either a Black-Scholes model or Monte Carlo simulation. No further grants have been made under the BGI EOP since 2008. Sharepurchase, ESAS, and AGLESAS are nil cost awards on which the performance conditions are substantially completed at the date of grant. Consequently the fair value of these awards is based on the market value at that date.

As described above, the terms of the ESAS scheme require shares to be held for a set number of years from the date of vest. The calculation of the vest date fair value of such awards includes a reduction for this post-vesting restriction. This discount is determined by calculating how much a willing market participant would rationally pay to remove the restriction using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The total discount required in 20072008 is £10m (2007: £66m, (2006: £62m, 2005: £36m)2006: £62m).

The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2008 are as follows:

    2008
    Sharesave  PSP  AGLESAS

Weighted average share price

  3.11  5.45  7.17

Weighted average exercise price

  2.51  2.07  

Expected volatility

  37%  37%  0%

Expected option life

  4 years  3 years  5 years

The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2007 are as follows:

 

     2007
  2007
  Sharesave  PSP  BGI EOP  AGLSIT
  Sharesave  PSP  BGI EOP  AGLSIT

Weighted average share price

    5.82  7.07  95.33  9.18  5.82  7.07  95.33  9.18

Weighted average exercise price

    4.81    95.33  7.62  4.81    95.33  7.62

Expected volatility

    25%  25%  20%  30%  25%  25%  20%  30%

Expected option life

     4 years  3 years  4 years  5 years  4 years  3 years  4 years  5 years

The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2006 are as follows:

     2006
  Sharesave  PSP  BGI EOP  AGLSIT

Weighted average share price

    6.20  6.74  81.12  8.92

Weighted average exercise price

    5.11    81.12  6.57

Expected volatility

    25%  25%  24%  29%

Expected option life

     4 years  3 years  4 years  5 years

The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2005 are as follows:

  2005
  Sharesave  PSP  BGI EOP  AGLSIT  ISOP

Weighted average share price

  5.71  5.33  39.09  8.25  5.73

Weighted average exercise price

  4.44  n/a  39.09  8.41  5.66

Expected volatility

  24%  20%  25%  n/a  34%

Option life

  4 years  3 years  4 years  5-8 years  5 years

The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2006 are as follows:

    2006
    Sharesave  PSP  BGI EOP  AGLSIT

Weighted average share price

  6.20  6.74  81.12  8.92

Weighted average exercise price

  5.11    81.12  6.57

Expected volatility

  25%  25%  24%  29%

Expected option life

  4 years  3 years  4 years  5 years

Expected volatility and dividend yield on the date of grant have been used as inputs into the respective valuation models for Sharesave and PSP. Expected volatility has been determined using historical volatility of its peers over the expected life of the options for BGI EOP and AGLSIT applies a five-year rolling period.

The yield on UK government bonds with a commensurate life has been used to determine the risk-free discount rate of 5%4% for all schemes other than AGLSIT. Option life is estimated based upon historical data for the holding period of options between grant and exercise dates. The risk-free rate on the AGLSIT scheme represents the yield, recorded on date of option grant, on South African government zero coupon bond of a term commensurate to the expected life of the option.

 

246

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

214


LOGO

LOGO

4445 Share-based payments(continued)

For the purposes of determining the expected life and number of options to vest, historical exercise patterns have been used, together with an assumption that a certain percentage of options will lapse due to leavers.

The assumed dividend yield for Barclays PLC is the average annual dividend yield on the date of grant of 4%5%. Dividend yield for AGLSIT of 3.5% was based on the average 12-month trailing yield over the year to grant date.

Analysis of the movement in the number and weighted average exercise price of options is set out below:

 

  Sharesavea  Sharepurchasea,c
  Sharesavea  Sharepurchasea,d
  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  2008 2007 2008  2007  2008 2007 2008  2007
  2007 2006 2007  2006  2007 2006 2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year

  78,929  85,686  4.22  3.95  2,472  1,126      74,027  78,929  4.48  4.22  3,824  2,472    

Granted in the year

  18,748  17,449  4.81  5.11  1,852  1,561      56,024  18,748  2.51  4.81  3,834  1,852    

Adjustment in grants for open offer

  1,354    4.33          

Exercised/released in the year

  (18,018) (18,727) 3.70  3.84  (256) (113)     (3,357) (18,018) 3.71  3.70  (64) (256)   

Less: forfeited in the year

  (5,632) (5,479) 4.53  4.11  (244) (102)     (33,917) (5,632) 4.35  4.53  (633) (244)   

Less: expired in the year

                                

Outstanding at end of year

  74,027  78,929  4.48  4.22  3,824  2,472      94,131  74,027  1.83  4.48  6,961  3,824    

Of which exercisable:

  

 

2,324

 

 

 

915

 

 

 

3.69

  

 

3.87

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  4,025  2,324  3.71  3.69  737      
              ESASa,c  PSPa,c
  ESASa, d  PSPa, d
  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  2008 2007 2008  2007  2008 2007 2008  2007
  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year

  142,359  121,515      42,832  20,269      182,200  142,359      63,163  42,832    

Granted in the year

  76,064  59,758      20,331  22,563      141,269  76,064      8,528  20,331    

Adjustment in grants for open offer

  6,884        1,370      

Exercised/released in the year

  (31,036) (33,663)             (56,231) (31,036)     (1,467)     

Less: forfeited in the year

  (5,187) (5,251)             (6,185) (5,187)     (20,865)     

Less: expired in the year

                                

Outstanding at end of year

  182,200  142,359      63,163  42,832      267,937  182,200      50,729  63,163    

Of which exercisable:

  

 

16,587

 

 

 

9,607

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  15,131  16,587            
  ISPa ,c  Absa BEEb
            
  BGI EOPb  Absa BEEc  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  2008 2007 2008  2007  2008 2007 2008  2007
  2007 2006 2007  2006  2007 2006 2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year/acquisition date

  6,929  5,442  57.79  25.26  73,152  73,152  3.50-5.03  4.41-6.35          73,152  73,152  3.40-3.89  3.50-5.03

Granted in the year

  2,599  3,973  95.33  81.12          6,923              

Adjustment in grants for open offer

  177              

Exercised/released in the year

  (1,632) (2,188) 34.99  19.92                        

Less: forfeited in the year

  (394) (298) 59.63  52.66                        

Less: expired in the year

                                

Outstanding at end of year

  7,502  6,929  75.66  57.79  73,152  73,152  3.40-3.89  3.50-5.03  7,100        73,152  73,152  3.16-4.55  3.40-3.89

Of which exercisable:

  

 

1,556

 

 

 

1,050

 

 

 

47.00

  

 

18.99

  

 

73,152

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.40-3.89

  

 

          73,152  73,152  3.16-4.55  3.40-3.89
              AGLSITb  AGLSOTb
  AGLSITc  AGLSOTc
  

Number

(000s)

 

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

 Weighted average
ex. price (£)
  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  2008 2007 2008  2007  2008 2007 2008  2007
  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year/acquisition date

  18,778  25,126  3.87  4.38  4,847  5,359  3.50-5.03  4.41-6.35  13,618  18,778  4.81  3.87  946  4,847  3.40-3.89  3.50-5.03

Granted in the year

  260  586  7.62  6.57            260    7.62        

Exercised/released in the year

  (4,668) (6,137) 3.60  2.86  (3,592)       (3,252) (4,668) 3.37  3.60  (368) (3,592)   

Less: forfeited in the year

  (752) (797) 5.22  4.12  (309) (512) 3.40-3.89  3.85-5.53  (399) (752) 4.96  5.22  (19) (309) 3.16-4.55  3.40-3.89

Less: expired in the year

                                

Outstanding at end of year

  13,618  18,778  4.81  3.87  946  4,847  3.40-3.89  3.50-5.03  9,967  13,618  4.91  4.81  559  946  3.16-4.55  3.40-3.89

Of which exercisable:

  

 

5,603

 

 

 

5,305

 

 

 

3.25

  

 

2.43

  

 

946

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.40-3.89

  

 

  5,944  5,603  3.86  3.25  559  946  3.16-4.55  3.40-3.89

Notes

aOptions/award granted over Barclays PLC shares.

bOptions/award granted over Absa Group Limited shares.

cNil cost award.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

247


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

45 Share-based payments(continued)

    AGLESAS c,d  BGI EOP b
    Number
(000s)
  

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

  

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

    2008  2007  2008  2007  2008  2007  2008  2007
Outstanding at beginning of year/acquisition date  37  37      7,502  6,929  75.66  57.79

Granted in the year

  1,019          2,599    95.33

Exercised/released in the year

          (550) (1,632) 34.35  34.99

Less: forfeited in the year

  (41)       (368) (394) 86.57  59.63

Less: expired in the year

                

Outstanding at end of year

  1,015  37      6,584  7,502  78.50  75.66

Of which exercisable:

          3,631  1,556  69.29  47.00

    ISOP a  ESOS a
    

Number

(000s)

  

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  

Number

(000s)

  

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

    2008  2007  2008  2007  2008  2007  2008  2007

Outstanding at beginning of year

  20,549  77,507  4.56  4.59  1,423  1,748  4.13  4.14

Granted in the year

                

Adjustment in grants for open offer

  537    4.44    12    4.33  

Exercised/released in the year

  (539) (9,718) 4.06  4.35  (70) (325) 3.97  4.20

Less: forfeited in the year

    (47,240)   4.66  (892)   3.97  

Less: expired in the year

                

Outstanding at end of year

  20,547  20,549  4.44  4.56  473  1,423  4.33  4.13

Of which exercisable:

  20,547  20,238  4.44  4.54  473  1,423  4.33  4.13

    Woolwich ESOP a
    Number
(000s)
  

Weighted average

ex. price (£)

    2008  2007  2008  2007

Outstanding at beginning of year

  540  700  3.81  3.81

Granted in the year

        

Adjustment in grants for open offer

  12    3.70  

Exercised/released in the year

  (104) (160) 3.10  3.84

Less: forfeited in the year

  (6)   3.65  

Less: expired in the year

        

Outstanding at end of year

  442  540  3.70  3.81

Of which exercisable:

  442  540  3.70  3.81

The table below shows the weighted average share price at the date of exercise/release of shares:

    

2008

£

  

2007

£

Sharesavea

  4.70  5.72

Sharepurchasea,d

  1.59  6.74

ESASa,d

  4.07  6.71

PSP

  2.07  n/a

BGI EOPb

  87.22  97.06

AGLSITc

  6.78  9.52

AGLSOTc

  6.79  n/a

ISOPa

  4.59  7.31

ESOSa

  4.74  7.26

Woolwich ESOPa

  4.72  7.24

Notes

aOptions/award granted over Barclays PLC shares.

 

bOptions/award granted over Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited shares.

 

cOptions/award granted over Absa Group Limited shares.

 

dNil cost award.

 

215248 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Notes to the accountsLOGO

For the year ended 31st December 2007

4445 Share-based payments (continued)

      AGLESASc, d
     Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

                    2007  2006  2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year/acquisition date

        37      

Granted in the year

          37    

Exercised/released in the year

              

Less: forfeited in the year

              

Less: expired in the year

              

Outstanding at end of year

 

              37  37    

Of which exercisable:

 

                    
            
   ISOPa  ESOSa
  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

    2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year

  77,507  105,081  4.59  4.46  1,748  2,552  4.14  4.16

Granted in the year

                

Exercised/released in the year

  (9,718) (25,122) 4.35  4.04  (325) (768) 4.20  4.20

Less: forfeited in the year

  (47,240) (2,452) 4.66  4.75    (36)   4.71

Less: expired in the year

                

Outstanding at end of year

 

  20,549  77,507  4.56  4.59  1,423  1,748  4.13  4.14

Of which exercisable:

 

  20,238  14,544  4.54  4.29  1,423  1,748  4.13  4.14
            
   Woolwich ESOPa  Woolwich SAYEa
  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

  Number

(000s)

 

 

 Weighted average

ex. price (£)

    2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006  2007  2006

Outstanding at beginning of year

  700  1,260  3.81  3.80    3    3.32

Granted in the year

                

Exercised/released in the year

  (160) (560) 3.84  3.79    (1)   3.32

Less: forfeited in the year

            (2)   3.32

Less: expired in the year

                

Outstanding at end of year

 

  540  700  3.81  3.81        

Of which exercisable:

 

  540  700  3.81  3.81        

The table below shows the weighted average share price at the date of exercise/release of shares:

    2007
£
  2006
£

Sharesavea

  5.72  6.95

Sharepurchasea, d

  6.74  6.59

ESASa, d

  6.71  6.78

BGI EOPb

  97.06  81.08

AGLSITc

  9.52  8.81

ISOPa

  7.31  6.75

ESOSa

  7.26  6.64

Woolwich ESOPa

  7.24  6.65

Woolwich SAYEa

 

  n/a  6.09

The exercise price range, the weighted average contractual remaining life and number of options outstanding (including those exercisable) at the balance sheet date are as follows:

Notes

aOptions/award granted over Barclays PLC shares.

bOptions/award granted over Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited shares.

cOptions/award granted over Absa Group Limited shares.

dNil cost award.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

216


LOGO

44 Share-based payments (continued)

  2007  2006  2008  2007

Exercise Price Range

  Weighted

average

remaining

contractual

life in years

  Number

of options

outstanding

  Weighted

average

remaining

contractual

life in years

  Number

of options

outstanding

  

Weighted

average

remaining

contractual

life in years

  

Number

of options

outstanding

  

Weighted

average

remaining

contractual

life in years

  

Number

of options

outstanding

Sharesavea

                

£1.44-£2.49

  3  2,121,926    

£2.50-£3.49

    328,822  1  2,177,121  4  54,437,940    328,822

£3.50-£4.49

  2  40,371,606  2  59,531,668  1  19,986,642  2  40,371,606

£4.50-£5.49

  4  33,327,119  4  17,220,043  3  17,584,689  4  33,327,119

Sharepurchasea, d

  2  3,824,021  3  2,472,304  2  6,960,593  2  3,824,021

ESASa, d

  3  182,200,170  3  142,359,494  3  267,936,513  3  182,200,170

ISPa,d

  2  7,099,655    

PSPa, d

  1  63,162,894  2  42,832,026  1  50,729,245  1  63,162,894

BGI EOPb

                

£6.11-£13.99

  4  239,717  5  602,914  4  101,000  4  239,717

£14.00-£20.11

  6  285,671  7  771,553  5  236,503  6  285,671

£20.12-£56.94

  7  1,059,430  8  1,716,714  6  759,213  7  1,059,430

£56.95-£95.33

  9  5,916,863  9  3,838,000  8  5,487,520  9  5,916,863

Absa BEEc

                

£3.40-£4.89

  2  73,152,300  3  73,152,300

£3.16-£4.55

  1  73,152,300  2  73,152,300

AGLSITc

                

£3.60-£7.62

  7  13,618,000  7  18,778,473

£1.66-£7.50

  6  9,967,000  7  13,618,000

AGLSOTc

                

£3.40-£4.89

  2  946,000  3  4,847,400

£3.16-£4.55

  1  559,000  2  946,000

AGLESASc, d

  3  37,059  3  37,059  3  1,015,000  3  37,059

ISOPa

                

£2.50-£3.49

  5  3,965,300  6  11,055,352  4  3,862,322  5  3,965,300

£3.50-£4.49

  3  1,409,828  4  2,411,828  2  1,558,449  3  1,409,828

£4.50-£5.49

  5  14,896,227  7  63,746,456  4  14,899,933  5  14,896,227

£5.50-£6.49

  7  277,096  8  293,096  7  225,894  7  277,096

ESOSa

                

£2.50-£3.49

    4,000  1  45,288        4,000

£3.50-£4.49

  1  1,418,818  2  1,702,612  1  472,561  1  1,418,818

Woolwich ESOPa

                

£2.50-£3.49

  2  110,616  3  128,624  1  89,644  2  110,616

£3.50-£4.49

  2  429,584  3  571,836  1

 

  352,961

 

  2

 

  429,584

 

There were no modifications to the share-based payment arrangements in the years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005.2006. As at 31st December 2007,2008, the total liability arising from cash-settled share-based payment transactions was £16m (2006: £7m)£23m (2007: £16m).

At 31st December 2007,2008, 6.6 million (2007: 7.5 million (2006: 6.9 million) options were outstanding under the terms of the BGI EOP (which would represent a 8.1%7.3% interest if exercised). Employees in BGI own 5.9%4.5% of the shares in Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited (2006: 9.4%(2007: 5.9%). If all the current options were exercised, £567.6m (2006: £400.5m)£516.9m (2007: £567.6m) would be subscribed. Since the scheme was introduced, options over 20.921.5 million (2006: 19.3(2007: 20.9 million) shares have been exercised, of which 5.03.8 million are still held by employees and represent a minority interest in the Group.

At 31st December 2007,2008, there were 73.2 million, 13.610 million and 0.90.6 million options granted over Absa Group Limited shares under the Absa Group Limited Black Economic Empowerment Transaction, Absa Group Limited Share Incentive Trust and Absa Group Limited Share Ownership Administrative Trust respectively. In aggregate, these options would represent a 13.1%11.0% interest in Absa Group Limited if exercised.

Impact of capital raising

During 2008, the number of shares in each award or option has been increased by 2.68% and any corresponding option exercise price has been decreased by 2.68% to reflect the impact of the capital raising in July. No adjustments were made for any other capital raising during 2008.

Notes

aOptions/awardOptions /award granted over Barclays PLC shares.

 

bOptions/awardOptions /award granted over Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Limited shares.

 

cOptions/awardOptions /award granted over Absa Group Limited shares.

 

dNil cost award.

 

217 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 249


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4546 Financial risks

Financial risk management

Barclays PLC is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail and commercial banking, credit cards, investment banking, wealth management and investment management services. Financial instruments are fundamental to the Group’s business and managing financial risks, especially credit risk, is a fundamental part of its business activity. Barclays achieves its risk management goals by keeping risk management at the centre of the executive agenda and by building a culture where risk management is part of everyday business decision-making. Barclays ensures that it has the capacity to manage the risk in its established businesses as well as new and growing ones, and that its business plans are consistent with risk appetite, that is, the level of risk Barclays is willing to accept in fulfilling its business objectives.

Barclays risk management policies and processes are designed to identify and analyse risk, to set appropriate risk appetite, limits, and controls, and to monitor the risks and adherence to limits by means of reliable and up-to-date data. Risk management policies, models and systems are regularly reviewed to reflect changes to markets, products and best market practice. Individual responsibility and accountability, instilled through training, are designed to deliver a disciplined, conservative and constructive culture of risk management and control.

Risk responsibilities

The Board approves risk appetite and the Board Risk Committee monitors the Group’s risk profile against this appetite:

 

The Group Risk Director, under delegated authority from the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director, has responsibility for ensuring effective risk management and control;

 

Business Heads are responsible for the identification and management of risk in their businesses;

 

Business risk teams, each under the management of a Business Risk Director, are responsible for assisting Business Heads in the identification and management of their business risk profiles for implementing appropriate controls. These risk management teams also assist Group Risk in the formulation of Group Risk policy and the implementation of it across the businesses;

 

Within Group risk,Risk, Risk-Type Heads and their teams are responsible for establishing a risk control framework and risk oversight; and

 

Internal Audit is responsible for the independent review of risk management and the control environment.

Oversight of risk management is exercised by the Risk Oversight Committee which is chaired by the Group Risk Director under authority delegated by the Group Finance Director. The Risk Oversight Committee oversees management of the Group’s risk profile, exercised through the setting, review and challenge of the size and constitution of the profile when viewed against the Group risk appetite.

The Group Executive Committee monitors and manages risk-adjusted performance of businesses and receives a regularly quarterlyregular update on forward risk update including a copy oftrends and the Group Risk Profile Report.

The Board Risk Committee (BRC) reviews the Group risk profile, approves the Group Control Framework and approves minimum control requirements for principal risks.

The Board Audit Committee (BAC) considers the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group Control Framework and receives quarterly reports on control issues of significance and half-yearly reports on impairment allowances and regulatory reports.

Both BRC and BAC also receive reports dealing in more depth with specific issues relevant at the time. The proceedings of both Committees are reported to the full Board. The Board approves the overall Group risk appetite.

The Risk Oversight Committee is chaired by the Group Risk Director and oversees the management of the Group’s risk profile and all of its significant risks. Oversight is exercised through the setting, review and challenge of the size and constitution of the profile when viewed against the Group’s risk appetite. It has delegated and apportioned responsibility for credit risk management to the Retail and Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committees.

The main financial risks affecting the Group are discussed in Notes 4647 to 48.

46 Market risk

Market risk is the risk that Barclays earnings or capital, or its ability to meet business objectives, will be adversely affected by changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices such as interest rates, credit spreads, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign exchange rates.

Most market risk arises from trading activities. Barclays is also exposed to interest rate and potential foreign exchange risks arising from financial assets and liabilities not held for trading.

Market risk management and control responsibilities

The Board approves the overall market risk appetite. The Market Risk Director is responsible for the market risk control framework and, under delegated authority from the Group Risk Director, sets a limit framework within the context of the approved market risk appetite.

The head of each business, assisted by the business risk management team, is accountable for identifying, measuring and managing all market risks associated with the business’ activities. Oversight and support is provided by the Market Risk Director, assisted by the central market risk team.

Market risk measurement

The measurement techniques used to measure and control market risk include:

Daily Value at Risk;

Stress Tests; and

Annual Earnings at Risk.

Daily Value at Risk (DVaR)

DVaR is an estimate of the potential loss which might arise from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day, measured to a confidence level of 98%. Daily losses exceeding the DVaR figure are likely to occur, on average, twice in every 100 business days.

In Barclays Capital, DVaR is an important market risk measurement and control tool. DVaR is calculated using the historical simulation method with a historical sample of two years.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

218


LOGO

46 Market risk (continued)

DVaR Back-testing

The DVaR model is regularly assessed. The main approach employed is the technique known as back-testing which counts the number of days when trading losses exceed the corresponding DVaR estimate.

On the basis of DVaR estimated to a 98% confidence level, on average there would be five days each year when trading losses would be expected to exceed DVaR and would therefore be reflected as back-testing exceptions. For Barclays Capital’s trading book, there were seven instances of a daily trading loss exceeding the corresponding 98% back-testing DVaR. These back-testing exceptions in 2007 reflected the increased volatility across a number of markets in which Barclays Capital operates. There were no instances of back-testing exceptions on a similar basis in 2006.

Annual Earnings at Risk (AEaR)

AEaR measures the sensitivity of net interest income (NII) over the next 12 months. It is calculated as the difference between the estimated income using the current yield curve and the lowest estimated income following a 50 basis points increase or decrease in interest rates.

AEaR is used primarily to measure interest rate risk arising on non-trading assets and liabilities.

Traded market risk

Traded market risk management

Barclays policy is to concentrate trading activities in Barclays Capital. This includes transactions where Barclays Capital acts as principal with clients or with the market. For maximum efficiency, client and market activities are managed together.

In Barclays Capital, the Head of Market Risk is responsible for implementing the market risk control framework. Day to day responsibility for market risk lies with the senior management of Barclays Capital, supported by the Market Risk Management team that operates independently of the trading areas. Daily market risk reports are produced for the main Barclays Capital business areas covering the different risk categories including: interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity and foreign exchange. A more detailed trading market risk presentation is produced fortnightly and discussed at Barclays Capital’s Traded Products Risk Review meeting. This meeting is attended by the senior managers from Barclays Capital and the central market risk team.

Analysis of trading market risk exposures

The table below shows the DVaR statistics for Barclays Capital’s trading and non-trading activities. DVaR is the main measure for internal risk management within Barclays Capital.

Barclays Capital’s market risk exposure, as measured by average total Daily Value at Risk (DVaR), increased by 13% to £42.0m (2006: £37.1m). Interest rate and credit spread risks were broadly unchanged while commodity DVaR and equity DVaR increased by £8.9m and £3.4m respectively. The growth in both these risks is consistent with Barclays Capital’s business plan. Diversification across risk types remained significant, reflecting the broad product mix. Total DVaR as at 31st December 2007 was £53.9m (31st December 2006 £41.9m). This growth reflected the increased market volatility in the second half of the year.

Barclays Capital DVaR: Summary table for 2007 and 2006

   

 

12 months to

31st December 2007

   Average

£m

 

 

 High

£m

  Low

£m

Interest rate risk

  20.0  33.3  12.6

Credit spread risk

  24.9  43.3  14.6

Commodities risk

  20.2  27.2  14.8

Equities risk

  11.2  17.6  7.3

Foreign exchange risk

  4.9  9.6  2.9

Diversification effecta

 

  (39.2) n/a  n/a
    

Total DVaR

 

  42.0  59.3  33.1

   

 

12 months to

31st December 2006

   Average

£m

 

 

 High

£m

  Low

£m

Interest rate risk

  20.1  28.8  12.3

Credit spread risk

  24.3  33.1  17.9

Commodities risk

  11.3  21.6  5.7

Equities risk

  7.8  11.6  5.8

Foreign exchange risk

  4.0  7.7  1.8

Diversification effecta

 

  (30.4) n/a  n/a
    

Total DVaR

 

  37.1  43.2  31.3

Note

aThe high (and low) DVaR figures reported for each category did not necessarily occur on the same day as the high (and low) DVaR reported as a whole. Consequently, a diversification effect number for the high (and low) DVaR figures would not be meaningful and it is therefore omitted from the above table.

219

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

46 Market risk (continued)

Non-trading interest rate risk

Asset and liability market risk

Interest rate risk arises from the provision of retail and wholesale (non-trading) banking products and services, as well as foreign currency translational exposures within the Group’s balance sheet.

The Group’s approach is to transfer risk from the businesses either into local treasuries or to Group Treasury using an internal transfer price or interest rate swap. The methodology used to transfer this risk depends on whether the product contains yield curve risk, basis risk or customer optionality. Limits exist to ensure there is no material risk retained within any business or product area.

Sensitivity analysis

Set out below are the impacts on net interest income and equity of a reasonably possible change in market rates of interest, based on the AEaR model described above.

(a) Impact on net interest income

The sensitivity of the income statement is the effect of the assumed changes in interest rates on the net interest income for one year, based on the non-trading financial assets and financial liabilities held at 31st December 2007, including the effect of hedging instruments.

The effect on net interest income, and therefore profit before tax, of a 50 basis points change would be as follows:

    

+50 basis
points

2007

£m

  

–50 basis

points

2007

£m

  

+50 basis

points

2006

£m

  

–50 basis

points

2006

£m

 

GBP

  19  (19) 11  (11)

USD

  (1) 1  (4) 4 

EUR

  (11) 11  (9) 9 

ZAR

  9  (9) 12  (12)

Others

 

  2  (2) 1  (1)

 

Total

 

  18  (18) 11  (11)

 

As percentage of net interest income

 

  0.19%  (0.19%) 0.12%  (0.12%)

Note: This table excludes exposures held or issued by Barclays Capital as these are measured and managed using DVaR.

(b) Impact on equity

Interest rate changes affect equity in the following three ways:

·

Higher or lower profit after tax resulting from higher or lower net interest income

·

Higher or lower available for sale reserves reflecting higher or lower fair values of available for sale financial instruments

·

Higher or lower values of derivatives held in the cash flow hedging reserves

The sensitivities of equity shown below are based on scenarios constructed from actual exposures and consider the impact on the cash flow hedging reserve and the available for sale reserve only. They are calculated by revaluing fixed rate available-for-sale financial assets, including the effect of any associated hedges, and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, for the effect of the assumed changes in interest rates. They are based on the assumption that there are parallel shifts in the yield curve. The effects of taxation have been estimated using the Group’s effective tax rate of 28% (2006: 27%).

    

+50 basis

points

2007

£m

  

–50 basis

points

2007

£m

  

+50 basis

points

2006

£m

  

–50 basis

points

2006

£m

 

Net interest income

  18  (18) 11  (11)

Taxation effects on the above

 

  (5) 5  (3) 3 

Effect on profit for the year

 

  13  (13) 8  (8)

As percentage of net profit after tax

 

  0.26%  (0.26%) 0.15%  (0.15%)

Effect on profit for year (per above)

  13  (13) 8  (8)

Available for sale reserve

  (150) 150  (185) 185 

Cashflow hedging reserve

  (225) 225  (304) 304 

Taxation effects on the above

 

  105  (105) 132  (132)

Effect on equity

 

  (257) 257  (349) 349 

As a percentage of equity

 

  (0.79%) 0.79%  (1.28%) 1.28% 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

220


LOGO

46 Market risk (continued)

Concentrations of interest rate risk

The table below summarises the repricing profiles of the Group’s financial instruments and other assets and liabilities at their carrying value on 31st December 2007. Items are allocated to time periods by reference to the earlier of the next contractual interest rate repricing date and the maturity date.

As at 31st December 2007

  Not more

than three

months

£m

 

 

 

 

 Over three
months
but not
more

than six
months

£m

 
 
 
 

 
 

 

 Over six

months

but not

more

than one

year

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over one
year

but not
more
than three
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over three

years

but not

more

than five

years

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over five

years

but not

more

than ten

years

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over ten

years

£m

 

 

 

 Trading

portfolio

and

derivatives

£m

  Non-

interest

bearing

£m

  Total

£m

 

Assets

             
Cash and balances at central banks  4,370                1,431  5,801
Items in course of collection from other banks  194                1,642  1,836

Trading portfolio assets

                193,691    193,691
Financial assets designated at fair value:             

Held on own account

  21,436  12,587  9,208  3,526  2,706  1,339  2,753    3,074  56,629

Derivative financial instruments

               248,088    248,088

Loans and advances to banks

  33,770  501  500  164  181  158      4,846  40,120

Loans and advances to customers

  246,776  20,481  14,452  20,312  10,864  10,082  5,193    17,238  345,398
Available for sale financial instruments  25,989  2,370  2,223  3,632  1,466  4,414  2,057    921  43,072

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  175,679

 

 

 3,307

 

 

 2,032

 

 

 802

 

 

 191

 

 

 118

 

 

 946

 

 

 

 

  

 

  183,075

 

 

Total financial assets

 

  508,214  39,246  28,415  28,436  15,408  16,111  10,949  441,779  29,152  1,117,710

 

Other assets

 

                  109,651  109,651

 

Total assets

 

  508,214  39,246  28,415  28,436  15,408  16,111  10,949  441,779  138,803  1,227,361

 

Liabilities

             

Deposits from other banks

  81,802  2,244  907  235  1  21  181    5,155  90,546
Items in course of collection due to other banks  76                1,716  1,792

Customer accounts

  233,474  8,812  3,844  2,511  377  59  1,217    44,693  294,987

Trading portfolio liabilities

                65,402    65,402
Financial liabilities designated at fair value:             

Held on own account

  27,030  7,993  3,874  3,122  2,323  724  766    28,657  74,489

Derivative financial instruments

                248,288    248,288

Debt securities in issue

  102,883  10,034  4,529  1,821  632  209  120      120,228
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent  163,112  1,789  2,085  37  92  4      2,310  169,429

Subordinated liabilities

 

  5,735  695  59  650  1,134  5,465  4,410    2  18,150

 

Total financial liabilities

 

  614,112  31,567  15,298  8,376  4,559  6,482  6,694  313,690  82,533  1,083,311

 

Other liabilities

 

                  111,574  111,574

 

Total liabilities

 

  614,112  31,567  15,298  8,376  4,559  6,482  6,694  313,690  194,107  1,194,885

Interest rate repricing gap

 

  (105,898) 7,679  13,117  20,060  10,849  9,629  4,255      

 

Cumulative gap

 

  (105,898) (98,219) (85,102) (65,042) (54,193) (44,564) (40,309)        

Financial assets designated at fair value held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts, and the related liabilities, have been omitted from the above analysis as the Group is not exposed to the interest rate risk inherent in these assets or liabilities.

221

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

46 Market risk (continued)

As at 31st December 2006

  Not more

than three

months

£m

 

 

 

 

 Over three
months
but not
more

than six
months

£m

 
 
 
 

 
 

 

 Over six

months

but not

more

than one

year

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over one
year

but not
more
than three
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over three

years

but not

more

than five

years

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over five

years

but not

more

than ten

years

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Over ten

years

£m

 

 

 

 Trading

portfolio

and

derivatives

£m

  Non-

interest

bearing

£m

  Total

£m

 

Assets

             

Cash and balances at central banks

  7,012                333  7,345
Items in course of collection from other banks  654                1,754  2,408

Trading portfolio assets

                177,867    177,867
Financial assets designated at fair value:             

Held on own account

  17,831  834  387  1,121  2,544  1,131  6,231    1,720  31,799

Derivative financial instruments

                138,353    138,353

Loans and advances to banks

  25,012  483  233  211  69  36  1    4,881  30,926

Loans and advances to customers

  195,500  15,048  14,225  24,850  9,485  6,399  7,699    9,094  282,300
Available for sale financial instruments  25,899  2,427  7,780  3,737  3,234  6,701  1,091    834  51,703

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  157,592

 

 

 4,721

 

 

 8,338

 

 

 

 

 

 3,431

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  8

 

  174,090

 

 

Total financial assets

 

  429,500  23,513  30,963  29,919  18,763  14,267  15,022  316,220  18,624  896,791

 

Other assets

 

                  99,996  99,996

 

Total assets

 

  429,500  23,513  30,963  29,919  18,763  14,267  15,022  316,220  118,620  996,787

 

Liabilities

             

Deposits from other banks

  72,353  1,377  763  351    7  199    4,512  79,562
Items in course of collection due to other banks  20                2,201  2,221

Customer accounts

  207,023  3,965  3,963  2,371  506  43  216    38,667  256,754

Trading portfolio liabilities

                71,874    71,874
Financial liabilities designated at fair value:             

Held on own account

  20,186  5,635  3,800  1,538  1,607  1,843  774    18,604  53,987

Derivative financial instruments

                140,697    140,697

Debt securities in issue

  92,649  5,624  2,430  4,020  1,630  3,249  1,535      111,137
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent  122,612  6,132  2,348  1,662      2,818    1,384  136,956

Subordinated liabilities

 

  3,192  377  21  1,074  783  3,475  4,842    22  13,786

 

Total financial liabilities

 

  518,035  23,110  13,325  11,016  4,526  8,617  10,384  212,571  65,390  866,974

 

Other liabilities

 

                  102,423  102,423

 

Total liabilities

 

  518,035  23,110  13,325  11,016  4,526  8,617  10,384  212,571  167,813  969,397

Interest rate repricing gap

 

  (88,535) 403  17,638  18,903  14,237  5,650  4,638      

 

Cumulative gap

 

  (88,535) (88,132) (70,494) (51,591) (37,354) (31,704) (27,066)        

Financial assets designated at fair value held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts, and the related liabilities, have been omitted from the above analysis as the Group is not exposed to the interest rate risk inherent in these assets or liabilities.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

222


LOGO

46 Market risk (continued)

Effective interest rates

Weighted average effective interest rates were as follows:

   2007
%
  2006
%

As at 31st December

    

 

Assets

    

Cash and balances at central banks

  4.2  4.1

Loans and advances to banks

  4.5  4.1

Loans and advances to customers

  7.1  6.5

Available for sale financial instruments

  5.0  4.6

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  4.2  4.2

 

Liabilities

    

Deposits from other banks

  4.2  4.3

Customer accounts

  3.8  3.4

Debt securities in issue

  5.3  5.0

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  3.9  4.2

Subordinated liabilities

 

  5.9  5.9

Foreign exchange risk

The group is exposed to two sources of foreign exchange risk.

(a) Transactional foreign currency exposure

Transactional foreign exchange exposures represent exposure on banking assets and liabilities, denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting entity.

The Group’s risk management policies prevent the holding of significant open positions in foreign currencies outside the trading portfolio managed by Barclays Capital which is monitored through DVaR.

There were no material net transactional foreign currency exposures outside the trading portfolio at either 31st December 2007 or 2006. Due to the low level of non-trading exposures no reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates would have a material effect on either the Group’s profit or movements in equity for the year ended 31st December 2007 or 2006.

(b) Translational foreign exchange exposure

The Group operates in a number of economic environments resulting in structural foreign exchange exposures on net investments in branches, subsidiaries or associated undertakings, the functional currencies of which are currencies other than Sterling.

Exchange differences are created by the translation of these net assets measured in their functional currencies to Sterling, the Group’s presentational currency. These exchange differences are recorded in the consolidated translation reserve and reflected in the statement of recognised income and expense. Additionally the Group’s regulatory capital ratios are sensitive to foreign exchange movements in reserves, goodwill, minority interests and other non-Sterling debt capital as well as non sterling risk weighted assets.

The Group’s policy is to economically hedge foreign currency net investments, where practical, after taking consideration of available markets to conduct hedging, the size of the investment and the cost of hedging; unless doing so would result in capital ratios which are overly sensitive to foreign exchange movements.

223

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

46 Market risk (continued)

The Group uses foreign currency borrowings and derivatives to hedge its foreign currency net investments. There was no ineffectiveness arising from these hedges in the year ended 31st December 2007. The carrying value of the Group’s foreign currency net investments and the foreign currency borrowings and derivatives used to hedge them as at 31st December 2007 were as follows:

At 31st December 2007

Functional currency of the operation involved

 

  Foreign
currency
net
investments
£m
  Borrowings
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Derivatives
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Structural

currency

exposures

pre economic

hedges

£m

  Economic
hedges
£m
  Remaining
structural
currency
exposures
£m
 
 
 
 
 

United States Dollar

  3,273  1,000    2,273  3,575  (1,302)

Euro

  3,690  1,506    2,184  2,387  (203)

Rand

  3,205    2,599  606  165  441 

Japanese Yen

  2,986  180  2,773  33    33 

Swiss Franc

  2,140    2,131  9    9 

Other

 

  1,847  53  465  1,329    1,329 

Total

 

  17,141  2,739  7,968  6,434  6,127  307 

At 31st December 2006

Functional currency of the operation involved

 

  Foreign
currency
net
investments
£m
  Borrowings
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Derivatives
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Structural

currency

exposures

pre economic

hedges

£m

  Economic
hedges
£m
  Remaining
structural
currency
exposures
£m
 
 
 
 
 

United States Dollar

  4,462  2,141    2,321  2,361  (40)

Euro

  3,409  1,185    2,224  2,180  44 

Rand

  2,849    2,665  184  165  19 

Japanese Yen

  2,754  202  2,527  25    25 

Swiss Franc

  2,071  158  1,900  13    13 

Other

 

  2,069  205  410  1,454  742  712 

Total

 

  17,614  3,891  7,502  6,221  5,448  773 

The economic hedges represent the US Dollar and Euro Preference Shares and Reserve Capital Instruments in issue that are treated as equity under IFRS, and do not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes.

The impact of a change in the exchange rate between Sterling and any of the major currencies would be:

A higher or lower profit after tax, arising from changes in the exchange rates used to translate items in the consolidated income statement

A higher or lower currency translation reserve within equity, representing the retranslation of non Sterling subsidiaries, branches and associated undertakings net of the revaluation of the hedges of net investments.

A higher or lower value of available for sale investments denominated in foreign currencies, impacting the available for sale reserve.

The impact of foreign exchange rate changes on derivatives and borrowings designated as IFRS net investment hedges would be fully offset by the impact on the hedged net investments, resulting in no impact on the Group profit or equity.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

224


LOGO

49.

47 Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of suffering financial loss, should any of the Group’s customers, clients or market counterparties fail to fulfil their contractual obligations to the Group. Credit risk arises mainly from commercial and consumer loans and advances, credit cards, and loan commitments arising from such lending activities, but can also arise from credit enhancement provided, such as financial guarantees, letters of credit, endorsements and acceptances.

Barclays is also exposed to other credit risks arising from investments in debt securities and other exposures arising from its trading activities (‘trading exposures’) including, non-equity trading portfolio assets, derivatives as well as settlement balances with market counterparties and reverse reporepurchase loans.

Losses arising from exposures held for trading (derivatives, debt securities) are accounted for as trading losses, rather than impairment charges, even though the fall in value causing the loss may be attributable to credit deterioration.

Maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral held or other credit enhancements

The following table presents the maximum exposure at 31st December 2008 and 2007 to credit risk of balance sheet and off balance sheet financial instruments, before taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements and after allowance for impairment and netting where appropriate.

For financial assets recognised on the balance sheet, the exposure to credit risk equals their carrying amount. For financial guarantees granted, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the maximum amount that Barclays would have to pay if the guarantees were to be called upon. For loan commitments and other credit related commitments that are irrevocable over the life of the respective facilities, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the full amount of the committed facilities.

This analysis and all subsequent analyses of credit risk include only financial assets subject to credit risk. They exclude other financial assets, mainly equity securities held in trading portfolio or available for sale as well as non-financial assets. The nominal value of off-balance sheet credit related instruments are also shown, where appropriate.

Financial assets designated at fair value held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts have not been included as the Group is not exposed to credit risk on these assets. Credit losses in these portfolios, if any, would lead to a reduction in the linked liabilities and result in no direct loss to the Group.

250

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Whilst the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of the assets or, in the case of off-balance sheet items, the amount guaranteed, committed, accepted or endorsed, in most cases the likely exposure is far less due to collateral, credit enhancements and other actions taken to mitigate the Group’s exposure.

A description of the credit risk management and control responsibilitiesmeasurement methodologies, the credit quality of the assets and the collateral and other credit enhancements held against them is included in the relevant sections within this Note, for each of the categories in the following table:

As at 31st December 2008

    Loans and
advances
£m
  Debt
securities
£m
  Derivatives
£m
  Reverse
repurchase
agreements
£m
  Others
£m
  

Total

£m

  Credit
market
exposure
£m

On-balance sheet:

                     

Cash and balances at central banks

              30,019  30,019   

Items in course of collection from other banks

              1,695  1,695   

Trading portfolio:

              

Treasury and other eligible bills

    4,544        4,544  

Debt securities

    148,686        148,686  4,745

Traded loans

  1,070              1,070   

Total trading portfolio

  1,070  153,230           154,300   
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:              

Loans and advances

  30,057        130  30,187  14,429

Debt securities

    8,628        8,628  

Other financial assets

  1,469        7,283  479  9,231   
Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  31,526  8,628     7,283  609  48,046   

Derivative financial instruments

        984,802        984,802  9,234

Loans and advances to banks

  47,707              47,707   

Loans and advances to customers:

              

Residential mortgage loans

  135,077          135,077  

Credit card receivables

  22,304          22,304  

Other personal lending

  32,038          32,038  

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  259,699          259,699  

Finance lease receivables

  12,697              12,697   

Total loans and advances to customers

  461,815              461,815  12,808

Available for sale financial investments:

              

Treasury and other eligible bills

    4,003        4,003  

Debt securities

     58,831           58,831  727

Total available for sale financial investments

     62,834           62,834   

Reverse repurchase agreements

        130,354    130,354  

Other assets

              3,096  3,096  109

Total on-balance sheet

  542,118  224,692  984,802  137,637  35,419  1,924,668   

Off-balance sheet:

              

Acceptances and endorsements

            585  
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements            53,942  

Commitments

                 260,816  1,030

Total off-balance sheet

                 315,343   

Total maximum exposure at 31st December

                 2,240,011   

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

251


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

47 Credit risk (continued)

At 31st December 2007

    Loans and
advances
£m
  Debt
securities
£m
  Derivatives
£m
  Reverse
repurchase
agreements
£m
  Others
£m
  

Total

£m

  Credit
market
exposure
£m

On-balance sheet:

                     

Cash and balances at central banks

              5,801  5,801   

Items in course of collection from other banks

              1,836  1,836   

Trading portfolio:

              

Treasury and other eligible bills

    2,094        2,094  

Debt securities

    152,778        152,778  6,239

Traded loans

  1,780              1,780   

Total trading portfolio

  1,780  154,872           156,652   
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:              

Loans and advances

  23,334        157  23,491  15,218

Debt securities

    24,217        24,217  

Other financial assets

  98        3,056  391  3,545   
Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  23,432  24,217     3,056  548  51,253   

Derivative financial instruments

        248,088        248,088  445

Loans and advances to banks

  40,120              40,120   

Loans and advances to customers:

              

Residential mortgage loans

  106,619          106,619  

Credit card receivables

  14,289          14,289  

Other personal lending

  29,857          29,857  

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  183,556          183,556  11,535

Finance lease receivables

  11,077              11,077   

Total loans and advances to customers

  345,398              345,398   

Available for sale financial investments:

              

Treasury and other eligible bills

    2,723        2,723  

Debt securities

     38,673           38,673  1,244

Total available for sale financial in vestments

     41,396           41,396   

Reverse repurchase agreements

        183,075    183,075  225

Other assets

              3,966  3,966  57

Total on-balance sheet

  410,730  220,485  248,088  186,131  12,151  1,077,585   

Off-balance sheet:

              

Acceptances and endorsements

            365  
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements            35,692  

Commitments

                 192,639  3,225

Total off-balance sheet

                 228,696   

Total maximum exposure at 31st December

                 1,306,281   

252

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Credit risk concentrations

A concentration of credit risk exists when a number of counterparties are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions.

The grantinganalyses of credit is onerisk concentrations presented below are based on the location of the Group’s major sourcescounterparty or customer or the industry in which they are engaged.

Credit risk concentrations by geographical sector

    2008
    United
Kingdom
£m
  

Other
European
Union

£m

  United
States
£m
  Africa
£m
  Rest of
the
World
£m
  

Total

£m

On-balance sheet:

            

Cash and balances at central banks

  8,406  11,039  8,381  1,712  481  30,019

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  1,447  59    169  20  1,695

Trading portfolio

  23,865  35,396  66,084  2,770  26,185  154,300

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  14,158  7,388  19,738  2,904  3,858  48,046

Derivative financial instruments

  317,621  215,054  366,161  4,403  81,563  984,802

Loans and advances to banks

  7,524  12,591  13,616  2,189  11,787  47,707

Loans and advances to customers

  213,079  91,109  75,826  44,373  37,428  461,815

Available for sale financial investments

  15,423  18,928  16,583  3,351  8,549  62,834

Reverse repurchase agreements

  22,659  41,724  47,034  848  18,089  130,354

Other assets

  1,198  548  550  520  280  3,096

Total on-balance sheet

  625,380  433,836  613,973  63,239  188,240  1,924,668

Off-balance sheet:

            

Acceptances and endorsements

  274    6  41  264  585

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements

  4,433  3,742  42,227  1,738  1,802  53,942

Commitments

  103,548  32,445  90,298  23,210  11,315  260,816

Total off-balance sheet

  108,255  36,187  132,531  24,989  13,381  315,343

Total

  733,635  470,023  746,504  88,228  201,621  2,240,011

Credit risk concentrations by geographical sector

    2007
    United
Kingdom
£m
  

Other
European
Union

£m

  United
States
£m
  Africa
£m
  Rest of
the
World
£m
  

Total

£m

On-balance sheet:

            

Cash and balances at central banks

  1,458  2,170  206  1,406  561  5,801

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  1,638  75    110  13  1,836

Trading portfolio

  28,959  41,675  53,208  877  31,933  156,652

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  15,713  5,907  20,396  958  8,279  51,253

Derivative financial instruments

  60,534  75,017  82,975  2,229  27,333  248,088

Loans and advances to banks

  5,515  11,102  13,443  2,581  7,479  40,120

Loans and advances to customers

  187,824  56,189  39,944  38,653  22,788  345,398

Available for sale financial investments

  5,934  18,354  7,818  2,944  6,346  41,396

Reverse repurchase agreements

  42,160  51,734  67,018  2,156  20,007  183,075

Other assets

  1,813  617  424  698  414  3,966

Total on-balance sheet

  351,548  262,840  285,432  52,612  125,153  1,077,585

Off-balance sheet:

            

Acceptances and endorsements

  227  5  5  34  94  365

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements

  7,377  1,468  23,696  1,286  1,865  35,692

Commitments

  90,964  23,946  48,657  20,471  8,601  192,639

Total off-balance sheet

  98,568  25,419  72,358  21,791  10,560  228,696

Total

  450,116  288,259  357,790  74,403  135,713  1,306,281

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

253


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

47 Credit risk(continued)

Credit risk concentrations by industrial sector
   2008
    

Government
and Central
Banks

£m

  Financial
Services
£m
  

Transport,
Postal and
communication
and Business

and other
services

£m

  

Agriculture,
Manufacturing
and
Wholesale
and retail
trade

£m

  

Construction
and

Property

£m

  Energy
and
water
£m
  

Residential
mortgage
loans

£m

  Other
personal
lending
£m
  Finance
lease
receivables
£m
  

Total

£m

 

On-balance sheet:

                    
Cash and balances at central banks  30,019                  30,019
Items in the course of collection from other banks  10  1,685                1,695
Trading portfolio  68,962  73,729  3,320  2,590  1,404  4,272    4  19  154,300
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  5,871  21,860  1,080  1,286  17,415  271    263    48,046
Derivative financial instruments  10,370  928,793  9,265  14,420  3,779  18,054    121    984,802
Loans and advances to banks  2,794  44,913                47,707
Loans and advances to customers  5,296  112,506  52,243  49,068  29,988  14,078  135,077  50,862  12,697  461,815
Available for sale financial investments  14,891  44,865  1,288  436  333  354  569  98    62,834
Reverse repurchase agreements  17,939  110,645  536  428  806          130,354

Other assets

 

  103  1,397  602  260  8  12  155  554  5  3,096

 

Total on-balance sheet

 

  

 

156,255

 

  

 

1,340,393

 

  

 

68,334

 

  

 

68,488

 

  

 

53,733

 

  

 

37,041

 

  

 

135,801

 

  

 

51,902

 

  

 

12,721

 

  

 

1,924,668

 

 

Off-balance sheet:

                    
Acceptances and endorsements    151  180  231  14  3    6    585
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements    44,858  4,161  2,275  778  1,604    266    53,942

Commitments

 

  5,096  33,746  32,769  36,815  11,405  16,279  12,196  112,510    260,816

 

Total off-balance sheet

 

  

 

5,096

 

  

 

78,755

 

  

 

37,110

 

  

 

39,321

 

  

 

12,197

 

  

 

17,886

 

  

 

12,196

 

  

 

112,782

 

  

 

 

  

 

315,343

 

 

Total

 

  

 

161,351

 

  

 

1,419,148

 

  

 

105,444

 

  

 

107,809

 

  

 

65,930

 

  

 

54,927

 

  

 

147,997

 

  

 

164,684

 

  

 

12,721

 

  

 

2,240,011

 

254

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Credit risk concentrations by industrial sector
   2007
    

Government
and Central
Banks

£m

  Financial
Services
£m
  

Transport,
Postal and
communication
and Business

and other
services

£m

  

Agriculture,
Manufacturing
and
Wholesale
and retail
trade

£m

  

Construction
and
Property

£m

  

Energy

and
water
£m

  

Residential
mortgage
loans

£m

  Other
personal
lending
£m
  Finance
lease
receivables
£m
  

Total

£m

 

On-balance sheet:

                    
Cash and balances at central banks  5,801                  5,801
Items in the course of collection from other banks  8  1,828                1,836
Trading portfolio  58,608  83,790  4,434  3,928  924  4,072  895  1    156,652
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  10,914  23,742  570  699  11,325  396  3,509  98    51,253
Derivative financial instruments  2,886  227,609  2,771  5,567  1,106  8,031  87  31    248,088
Loans and advances to banks  7,881  32,239                40,120
Loans and advances to customers  2,036  70,699  41,678  38,170  22,288  8,623  106,619  44,208  11,077  345,398
Available for sale financial investments  8,880  29,693  2,142  249  167  246    19    41,396
Reverse repurchase agreements  1,713  179,459  416  735  752          183,075

Other assets

 

  270  1,506  542  307  168  5  112  1,056    3,966

 

Total on-balance sheet

 

  

 

98,997

 

  

 

650,565

 

  

 

52,553

 

  

 

49,655

 

  

 

36,730

 

  

 

21,373

 

  

 

111,222

 

  

 

45,413

 

  

 

11,077

 

  

 

1,077,585

 

 

Off-balance sheet:

                    
Acceptances and endorsements    125  111  91  21  4    13    365
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security and securities lending arrangements  51  17,021  12,847  1,867  538  2,687  1  680    35,692
Commitments  4,511

 

  30,492

 

  26,370

 

  32,388

 

  11,282

 

  9,961

 

  10,969

 

  66,666

 

  

 

  192,639

 

 

Total off-balance sheet

 

  

 

4,562

 

  

 

47,638

 

  

 

39,328

 

  

 

34,346

 

  

 

11,841

 

  

 

12,652

 

  

 

10,970

 

  

 

67,359

 

  

 

 

  

 

228,696

 

 

Total

 

  

 

103,559

 

  

 

698,203

 

  

 

91,881

 

  

 

84,001

 

  

 

48,571

 

  

 

34,025

 

  

 

122,192

 

  

 

112,772

 

  

 

11,077

 

  

 

1,306,281

 

Loans and advances to customers in the above table has been reanalysed between Agriculture, Manufacturing and Wholesale and retail trade, Residential mortgage loans and Other personal to reflect changes in classification of incomeassets.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

255


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

47 Credit risk(continued)

Loans and is therefore one of its most significant risks,advances

Credit risk management

Governance and the Group dedicates considerable resources to controlling it effectively.responsibilities

The credit risk management teams in each business are accountable to the Business Risk Directors in those businesses who, in turn, report to the heads of their businesses and also to the Group Risk Director.

The Credit Riskcredit risk function provides Group-wide direction of credit risk-taking. The teams within this function manage the resolution of all significant credit policy issues and run the Credit Committee, which approves major credit decisions.

Each business segment has an embedded credit risk management team. These teams assist Group Risk in the formulation of Group Risk policy and theits implementation of it across the businesses. Examples include ensuring that:

Maximum exposure guidelines are in place relating to the exposures to any individual customer or counterparty;

Country risk policy specifies risk appetite by country and avoids excessive concentration of credit risk by country; and

Policies are in place to monitor exposures to individual industrial sectors.

The principal committees that review credit risk management, formulate overall Group credit policy and resolve all significant credit policy issues are the Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committee, the Retail Credit Risk Management Committee, the Risk Oversight Committee and the Board Risk Committee. All these Committees receive regular and comprehensive reports on risk issues.

The Retail Credit Risk Management Committee (RCRMC) oversees exposures, which comprise unsecured personal lending (including small businesses), mortgages and credit cards. The RCRMC monitors the risk profile and performance of the retail portfolios by receipt of key risk measures and indicators at an individual portfolio level, ensuring mitigating actions taken to address performance are appropriate and timely. Metrics reviewed will consider portfolio composition and both an overall stock and new flow level.

The Wholesale Credit Risk Management Committee (WCRMC) oversees wholesale exposures, comprising lending to businesses, banks and other financial institutions. The WCRMC monitors exposure by country, industry sector, individual large exposures and exposures to sub-investment grade countries.

The monthly Wholesale and Retail Credit Risk Management Committees exercise oversight through review and challenge of the size and constitution of the portfolios when viewed against Group risk appetite for wholesale and retail credit risks. They are chaired by the Group Wholesale and Retail Credit Risk Directors.

CorporateCredit monitoring

Wholesale and commercial lending

Corporate accountscorporate loans which are deemed to contain heightened levels of risk are recorded on graded problem loan lists known as early-warning or watch lists. These are updated monthly and circulated to the relevant risk control points. Once listing has taken place, exposures are closely monitored and, where appropriate, reduced.

These lists are graded in line with the perceived severity of the risk attached to the lending and its probability of default. Businesses with exposure toThe lists are updated on a monthly basis and are closely monitored.

Regardless of whether they are recorded on early-warning or watch lists, all wholesale and corporate customers all work to three categories of increasing concern. By the time an account becomes impaired it will normally have passed through all three categories, which reflect the need for ever-increasing caution and control.

Where an obligor’s financial health gives grounds for concern, it is immediately placed into the appropriate category. All obligors, regardless of financial health,loans are subject to a full review of all facilities on, at least, an annual basis. More frequent interim reviews may be undertaken should circumstances dictate.

Retail lending

Within the retail portfolios, whichloans (which tend to comprise homogeneous assets, statistical techniques more readily allow the risk of impairment to beassets) are monitored on a portfolio basis. This applies to UK Retail Banking, Barclays Wealth, International Retail and Commercial Banking and Barclaycard.

Within Local Business, accounts that are deemed to have a heightened level of risk, or that exhibit some unsatisfactory features which could affect viability in the short or medium term, are transferred to a separate ‘Caution’ refer stream where a cautious approach is appropriate. Accounts on the Caution refer stream are reviewed on at least a quarterly basis at which time consideration will be given to continuing with the agreed strategy, returning the customer to a lower risk refer stream, or instigating recovery or exit action if the strategy has failed.

Debt securities

Managing credit risk associated with debt securities differs in important respects from the process for loans originated by the Group. Firstly, market prices are generally available for listed bonds and securities and these prices are a good indicator of the credit standing of the issuer. Secondly, most listed and some unlisted securities are rated by external rating agencies which is another strong indicator of overall credit quality. Where such ratings are not available or are not current, the Group will have regard to its own internal ratings for the securities.

225

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

Settlement risk

The Group is exposed to settlement risk in its dealings with market counterparties (predominantly other financial institutions). These risks arise, for example, in foreign exchange transactions when Barclays pays away its side of the transaction to another bank or other counterparty before receiving payment from the other side. The risk is that the counterparty may not meet its obligation. It also arises on derivative contracts where the carrying value of the financial asset is related to the credit condition of the counterparty.

Settlement risk also arises through the operation of a number of systems through which Barclays makes and receives payments on behalf of its customers.

While these exposures are of short duration, they can be large. In recent years, settlement risk has been reduced by several industry initiatives that have enabled simultaneous and final settlement of transactions to be made (such as payment-versus-payment through Continuous Linked Settlement and delivery-versus-payment in central bank money).

Barclays has worked with its peers in the development of these arrangements. Increasingly the majority of high value transactions are settled by such mechanisms. Where these mechanisms are not available, the risk is further reduced by dealing predominantly with highly-rated counterparties, holding collateral and limiting the size of the exposures according to the rating of the counterparty, with smaller exposures to those of higher risk.

Country risk

Credit risk is manifested as country risk where difficulties may arise in the country in which the exposure is domiciled, thus impeding or reducing the value of the asset, or where the counterparty is the country itself.

Barclays manages country risk by setting a country risk appetite, which is known as the Country Guideline and agreed at the Group Credit Committee. All cross-border or domestic foreign currency transactions are aggregated to give the current utilisation, in terms of country loss given default (CLGD), against country appetite. The level of CLGD incurred by a counterparty transaction will largely depend on three main factors: the country severity, the product severity and counterparty grade. The calculation and loss given default is described under ‘Credit Risk measurement’ below.

CLGD is incurred in the country of direct risk, defined as where the majority of operating assets are held. This may differ from the country of incorporation. However, where transactions are secured with collateral, the country risk can be transferred from the country of the borrower to the country of the collateral provider. This is only permitted where the collateral definitely covers the borrowing and is not expected to decrease over time.

Credit risk measurement

Barclays uses statistical modelling techniques throughout its business in its credit rating systems. These systems assist the Bank in frontline credit decisions on new commitments and in managing the portfolio of existing exposures. They enable a coherent approach to risk measurement across all credit exposures, retail and wholesale. The key building blocks in the measurement system are the probability of customer default (PD), exposure in the event of default (EAD), and severity of loss-given-default (LGD). Using these, Barclays builds the analyses that lead to its decision support systems in the Risk Appetite context described previously.

Where financial models are used to monitor credit risk, they are based upon customers’ personal and financial performance information over recent periods as a predictor for future performance. The models are reviewed regularly to monitor their robustness relative to actual performance and amended as necessary to optimise their effectiveness.

For wholesale and corporate and wholesale customers,lending, Barclays also assesses the credit quality of borrowers and other counterparties and assigns them an internal risk rating. There are two different categories of default rating used. The first reflects the statistical probability of a customer in a rating class defaulting within the next 12-month period, and is referred to as a point in time rating (PIT). The second also reflects the statistical probability of a customer in a rating class defaulting, but the period of assessment is 12 months of average credit conditions for the customer type. This type of rating therefore provides a measure of risk that is independent of the current credit conditions for a particular customer type, is much more stable over time than a PIT rating and is referred to as a through the cycle (TTC) rating.

Country risk grades are assigned to all countries where the Group has, or is likely to have, exposure and are reviewed every quarter to ensure they remain appropriate. Country grades, which are derived from long-term sovereign foreign currency ratings, range from 1 (lowest probability of default) to 21 (highest probability of default). A ceiling is applied where a country is graded 12 or lower so that the counterparty cannot be graded higher than the country, unless some form of protection is available in the event of a cross-border event, such as a significant portion of a counterparty’s assets or income being held or generated in a convertible currency.

As noted above, for listed debt securities, the Group has regard to both external credit ratings and internal default grades where such ratings are not available or current.

Multiple rating methodologies may be used to inform the rating decision on individual large credits, such as internal and external models, rating agency grades and, for wholesale assets, market information such as credit spreads. For smaller credits, a single source may suffice, such as the result from a rating model.

For debt securities and counterparties where third party ratings are used to inform credit decisions, the Group mainly uses those provided by Standards and Poors’ or Moody’s.

Barclays wholesale credit rating contains 21 grades, representing the Group’s best estimate of credit risk for a counterparty based on current economic conditions.

Retail customers are not all assigned internal risk ratings in this way for account management purposes, although a mapping of the PITtherefore their probability of default to one of eight Barclays Retail Grades (BRG) is used for some internal reporting purposes.considered.

The tables below detail how external rating grades, Default GradesGroup considers Credit Risk Loans (defined as all customers overdue by 90 days or more, and/or individually impaired or restructured) and Barclays Retail Grades relateloan loss rates when assessing the credit performance of its loan portfolios, other than those held at fair value. For the purposes of historical and business unit comparison, loan loss rates are defined as total credit impairment charge (excluding available for sale assets and reverse repurchase agreements) divided by gross loans and advances to customers and banks (at amortised cost).

Credit risk mitigation

Where appropriate, the Group takes action to mitigate credit risk such as reducing amounts outstanding (in discussion with the customers, clients or counterparties if appropriate), using credit derivatives, securitising assets; and selling them.

Diversification to avoid unwanted credit risk concentrations is achieved through setting maximum exposure guidelines to individual counterparties. Excesses are reported to the categoriesRisk Oversight Committee and the Board Risk Committee. Mandate and scale limits are used to limit the stock of credit quality selected forcurrent exposures in a loan portfolio and the financial statements. Where applicable,flow of new exposures into a loan portfolio. Limits are typically based on the internal measuretenor and nature of probability of default has been presented for indicative purposes.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

226


LOGO

the lending.

47 Credit risk (continued)Collateral and security

ListedThe Group routinely obtains collateral and unlisted debt securitiessecurity to mitigate credit risk.

The Group ensures that any collateral held is sufficiently liquid, legally effective, enforceable and regularly reassessed. Before attaching value to collateral, businesses holding specific, agreed classes of collateral must ensure that they are holding a correctly perfected charge.

Before reliance is placed on third party protection in the form of bank, government or corporate guarantees or credit derivative protection from financial intermediary counterparties, a credit assessment is undertaken.

Security structures and legal covenants are subject to regular review, at least annually, to ensure that they remain fit for purpose and remain consistent with accepted local market counterparties where external ratings are availablepractice.

 

256

External ratingsBarclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

All loans and advances are categorised as either:

– neither past due nor individually impaired;

– past due but not individually impaired; or

– individually impaired.

The impairment allowance includes allowances against financial assets that have been individually impaired and those subject to collective impairment.

Credit risk loans comprise loans and advances to banks and customers 90 days overdue or more and those subject to individual impairment. The coverage ratio is calculated by reference to the total impairment allowance and the carrying value (before impairment) of credit risk loans.

    As at 31st December 2008
    

Neither past
due nor
individually
impaireda

£m

  

Past due
but not
individually
impairedb

£m

  

Individually
impaired

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Impairment
allowance

£m

  

Total
carrying
value

£m

  

Credit Risk
Loans

£m

  

Coverage
ratio

%

 

Trading portfolio:

               

Traded loans

  1,070      1,070    1,070    
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:               

Loans and advances

  29,182  875    30,057    30,057    

Other financial assets

  1,469      1,469    1,469    

Loans and advances to banks

  46,665  1,045  48  47,758  (51) 47,707  48  100.0

Loans and advances to customers:

               

Residential mortgage loans

  126,363  7,413  1,608  135,384  (307) 135,077  2,403  12.8

Credit card receivables

  21,092  1,426  1,231  23,749  (1,445) 22,304  1,990  72.6

Other personal lending

  30,539  1,342  2,040  33,921  (1,883) 32,038  2,685  70.1
Wholesale and corporate loans and advances  246,505  8,307  7,586  262,398  (2,699) 259,699  8,277  32.6

Finance lease receivables

 

  12,367  285  234  12,886  (189) 12,697  297  63.6

 

Total

 

  515,252

 

  20,693

 

  12,747

 

  548,692

 

  (6,574

 

)

 

 542,118

 

  15,700

 

  41.9

 

   As at 31st December 2007
    Neither past
due nor
individually
impaireda
£m
  Past due
but not
individually
impairedb
£m
  Individually
impaired
£m
  

Total

£m

  Impairment
allowance
£m
  

Total
carrying
value

£m

  

Credit Risk
Loans

£m

  

Coverage
ratio

%

 

Trading portfolio:

               

Traded loans

  1,780      1,780    1,780    
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:               

Loans and advances

  22,977  357    23,334    23,334    

Other financial assets

  98      98    98    

Loans and advances to banks

  37,601  2,522    40,123  (3) 40,120    
Loans and advances to customers:               

Residential mortgage loans

  100,323  5,813  615  106,751  (132) 106,619  1,014  13.0

Credit card receivables

  12,587  1,026  1,517  15,130  (841) 14,289  1,568  53.6

Other personal lending

  28,569  1,020  1,641  31,230  (1,373) 29,857  1,822  75.4
Wholesale and corporate loans and advances  171,949  7,987  4,930  184,866  (1,310) 183,556  5,058  25.9

Finance lease receivables

 

  10,890  159  141  11,190  (113) 11,077  179  63.1

 

Total

 

  386,774

 

  18,884

 

  8,844

 

  414,502

 

  (3,772

 

)

 

 410,730

 

  9,641

 

  39.1

 

Notes

aFinancial assets subject to collective impairment allowance are included in this column if they are not past due.

bFinancial assets subject to collective impairment allowance are included in this column if they are past due.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

 257


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

47 Credit risk(continued)

Credit quality of loans and advances neither past due nor individually impaired

    2008  2007
    Strong
£m
  Satisfactory
£m
  Higher risk
£m
  Total
£m
  Strong
£m
  Satisfactory
£m
  Higher risk
£m
  Total
£m

 

Trading portfolio:

                

Traded loans

  759  220  91  1,070  223  1,228  329  1,780
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:                

Loans and advances

  25,665  2,792  725  29,182  13,687  6,186  3,104  22,977

Other financial assets

    1,469    1,469  98      98

Loans and advances to banks

  40,181  6,384  100  46,665  35,635  1,955  11  37,601

Loans and advances to customers:

                

Residential mortgage loans

  82,363  42,770  1,230  126,363  60,563  38,000  1,760  100,323

Credit card receivables

    20,426  666  21,092    12,582  5  12,587

Other personal lending

  7,549  21,750  1,240  30,539  5,061  22,619  889  28,569

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  141,868  94,453  10,184  246,505  114,693  54,828  2,428  171,949

Finance lease receivables

 

  4,214  7,504  649  12,367  4,586  6,036  268  10,890

 

Total loans and advances

 

  

 

302,599

  

 

197,768

  

 

14,885

  

 

515,252

  

 

234,546

  

 

143,434

  

 

8,794

  

 

386,774

For the purposes of the analysis of credit quality, the following internal measures of credit quality have been used:

Retail lendingWholesale lending

Financial statements description

 

  

AAA, AA+, AA, AA-, A+, A, A-,BBB+, BBB, BBB-

Strong

BB+, BB, BB-, B+, B

Satisfactory

B-, CCC+, CCC and lower

Weak / Substandard

Wholesale lending

Default GradeProbability of default

 

 

Financial statements description

Probability of default

1-3

Strong0.0-0.05%

4-5

0.05-0.15%

6-8

0.15-0.30%

9-11

0.30-0.60%

12-14

Satisfactory0.60-2.15%

15-19

2.15-11.35%

20-21

Weak / Substandard11.35% +

Retail lending

Barclays Retail Grade

 

 

Financial statements descriptionDefault grade

Strong

0.0-0.60%

0.0-0.05%
0.05-0.15%
0.15-0.30%
0.30-0.60%

 

 Probability of default

1-3
4-5
6-8
9-11

 

1

Satisfactory

  Strong0.0-0.15%

2

0.60-10.00%

 0.15-0.30%

3

0.60-2.15%
2.15-11.35%

 

 0.30-0.60%

11-14
15-19

4-5

Satisfactory0.60-2.50%

5-7Higher risk

 

  2.50-10.00%

 

810.00% +

 

 Weak / Substandard

11.35% +

 10.00% +

20-21

Financial statement descriptions can be summarised as follows:

Strong – there is a very high likelihood of the asset being recovered in full. If it is a debt security, then it will be investment grade.

Satisfactory – whilst there is a high likelihood that the asset will be recovered and therefore, of no cause for concern to the Group, the asset may not be collateralised, or may relate to retail facilities, such as credit card balances and unsecured loans, which have been conservatively classified as satisfactory, regardless of the fact that the output of internal grading models may have indicated a higher classification. At the lower end of this grade there are customers that are being more carefully monitored, for example, corporate customers which are indicating some evidence of some deterioration, mortgages with a high loan to value ratio, and unsecured retail loans operating outside normal product guidelines.

Weak/Sub-standardHigher risk – there is concern over the obligor’s ability to make payments when due. However, these have not yet converted to actual delinquency. There may also be doubts over the value of collateral or security provided. However, the borrower or counterparty is continuing to make payments when due and is expected to settle all outstanding amounts of principal and interest.

Credit risk mitigation, collateral, security, and other credit enhancements

The Group uses a wide variety of techniques to reduce credit risk on its lending. The most important of these is performing an assessment of the ability of a borrower to service the proposed level of borrowing. Barclays policy is to establish that loans are within the customer’s capacity to repay, rather than to rely excessively on security. As a result no security is required for a wide range of lending products.

Credit risk mitigation

Barclays actively manages its credit exposures. When weaknesses in exposures are detected – either in individual exposures or in groups of exposures –the Group takes action to mitigate the risks. Such actions may, for example, include; reducing the amounts outstanding (in discussion with the customers, clients or counterparties if appropriate); using credit derivatives securitising the assets; and, on occasion, selling them.

Barclays maintains the diversification of its portfolio to avoid unwanted credit risk concentrations. Maximum exposure guidelines are in place relating to the exposures to any individual counterparty. These permit higher exposures to higher-rated borrowers than to lower-rated borrowers. They also distinguish between types of counterparty, for example, between sovereign governments, banks and corporations. Excesses are considered individually at the time of credit sanctioning, are reviewed regularly, and are reported to the Risk Oversight Committee and the Board Risk Committee.

Similarly, country risk policy specifies risk appetite by country and avoids excessive concentrations of credits in individual countries, whilst other policies limit lending to certain industries.

A further protection against undesirable concentration of risk is the mandate and scale framework. Mandate and scale limits, which can also be set at Group level to reflect overall risk appetite, can relate either to the stock of current exposures in the relevant portfolio or to the flow of new exposures into that portfolio. Typical limits include the proportion of lending with maturity in excess of seven years and the proportion of new mortgage business that is buy-to-let.

 

227258 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Loans and advances that are past due but not individually impaired

An age analysis of loans and advances that are past due but not individually impaired is set out below.

For the purposes of this analysis an asset is considered past due and included below when any payment due under strict contractual terms is received late or missed. The amount included is the entire financial asset, not just the payment, of principal or interest or both, overdue.

The table below provides a breakdown of total financial assets past due but not individually impaired. In general, retail and wholesale loans fall into this category for two separate reasons. Retail loans and advances to customers may come under this category because the impairment allowance on such loans is calculated on a collective – not individual – basis. This reflects the homogenous nature of the assets, which allows statistical techniques to be used, rather than individual assessment.

In contrast, some loans to wholesale and corporate customers and banks may come under this category because of instances where a payment on a loan is past due without requiring an individual impairment allowance. For example, an individual impairment allowance will not be required when a loss is not expected due to a corporate loan being fully secured or collateralised. As a result, it is past due but not individually impaired.

    2008
    

Past due
up to 1
month

£m

  Past due
1-2
months
£m
  Past due
2-3
months
£m
  Past due
3-6
months
£m
  Past due
6 months
and over
£m
  Total
£m
  Of which
Credit
Risk Loans
£m

 

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:

              

Loans and advances

 

  315  147  81  82  250  875  

 

Loans and advances to banks

 

  

 

1,044

  

 

1

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

1,045

  

 

 

Loans and advances to customers:

              

Residential mortgage loans

  4,420  1,568  630  713  82  7,413  795

Credit card receivables

  293  224  150  291  468  1,426  759

Other personal lending

  220  204  273  338  307  1,342  645

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  6,229  540  847  477  214  8,307  691

Finance lease receivables

 

  130  53  39  63    285  63

 

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  

 

11,292

  

 

2,589

  

 

1,939

  

 

1,882

  

 

1,071

  

 

18,773

  

 

2,953

 

Total financial assets past due but not individually impaired

 

  

 

12,651

  

 

2,737

  

 

2,020

  

 

1,964

  

 

1,321

  

 

20,693

  

 

2,953

   2007
    Past due
up to 1
month
£m
  Past due
1-2
months
£m
  

Past due
2-3

months
£m

  Past due
3-6
months
£m
  Past due
6 months
and over
£m
  Total
£m
  

Of which
Credit

Risk Loans
£m

 

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:

              

Loans and advances

 

  261  4  1  24  67  357  

 

Loans and advances to banks

 

  

 

2,031

  

 

305

  

 

186

  

 

  

 

  

 

2,522

  

 

 

Loans and advances to customers:

              

Residential mortgage loans

  3,609  1,349  456  215  184  5,813  399

Credit card receivables

  558  155  107  205  1  1,026  51

Other personal lending

  271  199  193  152  205  1,020  181

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  6,970  622  267  62  66  7,987  128

Finance lease receivables

 

  75  28  18  38    159  38

 

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  11,483

 

  2,353

 

  1,041

 

  672

 

  456

 

  16,005

 

  797

 

 

Total financial assets past due but not individually impaired

 

  13,775

 

  2,662

 

  1,228

 

  696

 

  523

 

  18,884

 

  797

 

Loans and advances individually assessed as impaired

An analysis of financial assets individually assessed as impaired is as follows:

    2008  2007
    

Original
carrying
amount

£m

  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Revised
carrying
amount
£m
  Original
carrying
amount
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Revised
carrying
amount
£m

Loans and advances to banks individually impaired

 

  48

 

  (44

 

)

 

 4

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and advances to customers:

          

Residential mortgage loans

  1,608  (227) 1,381  615  (88) 527

Credit card receivables

  1,231  (727) 504  1,517  (725) 792

Other personal lending

  2,040  (1,250) 790  1,641  (1,030) 611

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  7,586  (2,310) 5,276  4,930  (944) 3,986

Finance lease receivables

 

  234  (140) 94  141  (102) 39

 

Total loans and advances individually impaired

 

  12,747

 

  (4,698

 

)

 

 8,049

 

  8,844

 

  (2,889

 

)

 

 5,955

 

 

Collective impairment allowance

 

     (1,876

 

)

 

       (883

 

)

 

  

 

Total impairment allowance

 

     (6,574

 

)

 

       (3,772

 

)

 

  

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

259


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

47 Credit risk(continued)

BusinessesThe movements on the impairment allowance during the year were as follows:

    2008
    At
beginning
of year
£m
  Acquisitions
and
disposals
£m
  

Unwind
of

discount
£m

  Exchange
and other
adjustments
£m
  

Amounts
written
off

£m

  Recoveries
£m
  Amounts
charged to
income
statement
£m
  

Balance

at 31st

December
£m

 

Loans and advances to banks

 

  

 

3

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

  

 

 

 

 

 

7

  

 

40

  

 

51

 

Loans and advances to customers:

           

Residential mortgage loans

  132    (35) 19  (44) 3  232  307

Credit card receivables

  841  306  (68) 94  (845) 69  1,048  1,445

Other personal lending

  1,373  1  (32) 134  (525) 42  890  1,883
Wholesale and corporate loans and advances  1,310      506  (1,428) 41  2,270  2,699

Finance lease receivables

 

  113      37  (77)  12  104  189

 

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  

 

3,769

  

 

307

 

 

 

 

(135)

 

 

 

 

790

  

 

(2,919)

 

 

 

 

167

  

 

4,544

  

 

6,523

 

Total impairment allowance

 

  

 

3,772

  

 

307

 

 

 

 

(135)

 

 

 

 

791

  

 

(2,919)

 

 

 

 

174

  

 

4,584

  

 

6,574

    2007
    

At
beginning
of year

£m

  

Acquisitions
and
disposals

£m

  

Unwind

of

discount
£m

  

Exchange
and other
adjustments

£m

  

Amounts
written off

£m

  Recoveries
£m
  Amounts
charged to
income
statement
£m
  

Balance

at 31st
December
£m

 

Loans and advances to banks

 

  4        (1)  13  (13)  3

 

Loans and advances to customers:

             

Residential mortgage loans

  124      2  (5) 5  6  132

Credit card receivables

  1,030  (75) (60) 4  (819) 103  658  841

Other personal lending

  1,139    (53) 10  (668) 54  891  1,373
Wholesale and corporate loans and advances  939  1    37  (440) 46  727  1,310

Finance lease receivables

 

  99  1      (30) 6  37  113

 

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  

 

3,331

  

 

(73)

 

 

 

 

(113)

 

 

 

 

53

  

 

(1,962)

 

 

 

 

214

  

 

2,319

  

 

3,769

 

Total impairment allowance

 

  

 

3,335

  

 

(73)

 

 

 

 

(113)

 

 

 

 

53

  

 

(1,963)

 

 

 

 

227

  

 

2,306

  

 

3,772

 

Loan Loss Rates

               
    

Gross

loans and
advances
£m

  Impairment
allowance
£m
  Loans and
advances
net of
impairment
£m
  

Impairment
charge

£m

  

Loan

Loss

Rate
basis point

 

As at 31st December 2008

  516,096  (6,574) 509,522  4,913  95

As at 31st December 2007

  389,290  (3,772) 385,518  2,782  71

260

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Renegotiated loans and advances

Loans and advances are generally renegotiated either as part of an ongoing customer relationship or in response to an adverse change in the circumstances of the borrower. In the latter case renegotiation can result in an extension of the due date of payment or repayment plans under which the Group offers a concessionary rate of interest to genuinely distressed borrowers. This will result in the asset continuing to be overdue and will be individually impaired where the renegotiated payments of interest and principal will not recover the original carrying amount of the asset. In other cases, renegotiation will lead to a new agreement, which is treated as a new loan.

Collateral and other credit enhancements held

Financial assets that are past due or individually assessed as impaired may put in placebe partially or fully collateralised or subject to other forms of credit risk mitigation, such as credit derivatives orenhancement.

Assets in these categories subject to collateralisation are mainly corporate loans, residential mortgage loans and finance lease receivables. Credit card receivables and other formspersonal lending are generally unsecured (although in some instances a charge over the borrowers property of credit protection in accordance with their procedures or policies. Hedges and mitigants are monitored and risk appetite reviewed to ensure that credit riskother assets may be sought).

Corporate loans

Security is kept to acceptable levels.

Collateral and security

Collateral and security can be an important mitigant of credit risk.

The Group routinely obtains collateral and security, such asusually taken in the caseform of a residentialfixed charge over the borrower’s property or commercial mortgage, a reverse repurchase agreement, or a commercial loan with a floating charge over book debts and inventories.

The Group ensures that any collateral heldthe assets of the borrower. Loan covenants may be put in place to safeguard the Group’s financial position. If the exposure is sufficiently liquid, legally effective, enforceable and regularly reassessed. Before attaching value to collateral, businesses holding specific, agreed classes of collateral must ensure that they are holding a correctly perfected charge.

The principal collateral and security types are as follows:

Personal lending – mortgages over residential properties;

Commercial and industrial sector – charges over business assets such as premises, stock and debtors, and third partylarge, either individually or at the portfolio level, credit protection (i.e. guarantees);

Commercial real estate sector – charges over the properties being financed; and,

Over-The-Counter (OTC ) trading exposures – cash; direct debt obligation government (G14+) bonds denominated in the domestic currency of the issuing country, debt issued by supranationals and letters of credit issued by an institution with a long-term unsecured debt rating of A+/A3 or better.

Valuation of the collateral and security taken is within agreed parameters.

Before reliance is placed on third party protection in the form of bank, governmentguarantees, credit derivatives or corporate guaranteesinsurance may be taken out.

For these and other reasons collateral given is only accurately valued on origination of the loan or credit derivative protection from financial intermediary counterparties,in the course of enforcement actions and as a credit assessmentresult it is undertaken. Eligibility parameters for guaranteesnot practicable to estimate the fair value of the collateral held.

Residential mortgage loans

These are secured by a fixed charge over the property.

A description and credit derivative are similar to those applied tothe estimated fair value of collateral held against OTC traded exposures.

Any collateral taken in respect of OTC trading exposures will be subject to a ‘haircut’ whichresidential mortgage loans that are past due or individually assessed as impaired is negotiated atas follows:

 

Nature of assets

      
    2008
Fair value
£m
  2007
Fair value
£m

 

Residential property

 

  

 

7,264

  

 

6,488

Collateral included in the time of signing the collateral agreement. A haircut is the valuation percentage applicable to each type of collateral and will be largely based on liquidity and price volatility of the underlying security.

The Group also uses various forms of specialised legal agreements to reduce risk, including entering into master netting agreement with counterparties, which the Group uses to restrict its exposure to credit losses. Group policy requires all netting arrangements to be legally documented. The ISDA Master Agreement isabove table reflects the Group’s preferred agreement for documenting OTC activity. It providesinterest in the contractual framework within which dealing activities across a full range of OTC products are conducted and contractually binds both parties to apply close-out netting across all outstanding transactions covered by an agreement if either party defaults or other pre-determined events occur. In the normal course of events, where the master agreement is ISDA, the collateral document will be the ISDA Credit Support Annex (CSA). The collateral document must give Barclays the power to realise any collateral placed with itproperty in the event of default. That held in the failureform of charges against residential property in the UK is restricted to the outstanding loan balance. In other territories, where the Group is not obliged to return any sale proceeds to the mortgagee, the full estimated fair value has been included.

Finance lease receivables

The net investment in the lease is secured through retention of legal title to the leased assets.

Collateral and other credit enhancements obtained

The carrying value of assets held by the Group as at 31st December 2008 as a result of the counterparty, and to place furtherenforcement of collateral when requested or in the event of insolvency, administration or similar processes,was as well as in the case of early termination.follows:

Security structures and legal covenants are subject to regular review, at least annually, to ensure that they remain fit for purpose and remain consistent with accepted local market practice.

 

Nature of assets

      
    2008
Carrying
amount
£m
  2007
Carrying
amount
£m

 

Residential property

  171  34

Commercial and industrial property

  2  1

Other credit enhancements

 

  61  

 

Total

 

  

 

234

  

 

35

Any properties repossessed are made available for sale in an orderly and timely fashion, with any proceeds realised being used to reduce or repay the outstanding loan. For business customers, in some circumstances, where excess funds are available after repayment in full of the outstanding loan, they are offered to any other, lower ranked, secured lenders. Any additional funds are returned to the customer. Barclays does not, as a rule, occupy repossessed properties for its business use.

Maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral held or other credit enhancements

For financial assets recognised on the balance sheet, the exposure to credit risk equals their carrying amount. For financial guarantees granted, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the maximum amount that Barclays would have to pay if the guarantees were to be called upon. For loan commitments and other credit related commitments that are irrevocable over the life of the respective facilities, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the full amount of the committed facilities.

The following table presents the maximum exposure at 31 December 2007 and 2006 to credit risk of balance sheet and off balance sheet financial instruments, before taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements and after allowance for impairment and netting where appropriate.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

228


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

This analysis and all subsequent analyses of credit risk include financial assets subject to credit risk only. They exclude other financial assets, mainly equity securities held in trading portfolio or available for sale as well as non-financial assets. The nominal value of off-balance sheet credit related instruments are also shown, where appropriate.

Financial assets designated at fair value held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts have not been included as the Group is not exposed to credit risk on these assets. Credit losses in these portfolios, if any, would lead to a reduction in the linked liabilities and result in no direct loss to the Group.

   2007

£m

  2006

£m

On balance sheet:

 

      

Cash and balances at central banks

 

  5,801  7,345

Items in course of collection from other banks

 

  1,836  2,408

Trading portfolio:

    

Treasury and other eligible bills

  2,094  2,960

Debt securities

  152,778  140,576

Traded Loans

 

  1,780  1,843

Total trading portfolio

 

  156,652  145,379

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:

    

Loans and advances

  23,491  13,196

Debt securities

  24,217  12,100

Other financial assets

 

  3,545  2,792

Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

 

  51,253  28,088

Derivative financial investments

 

  248,088  138,353

Loans and advances to banks

 

  40,120  30,926

Loans and advances to customers:

    

Residential mortgage loans

  111,955  94,511

Credit card receivables

  14,289  13,399

Other personal lending

  24,968  20,511

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  183,109  143,836

Finance lease receivables

 

  11,077  10,043

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  345,398  282,300

Available for sale financial investments:

    

Treasury and other eligible bills

  2,723  2,420

Debt securities

 

  38,673  47,912

Total available for sale financial investments:

 

  41,396  50,332

Reverse repurchase agreements

  183,075  174,090

Other assets

 

  3,966  4,097

Total on balance sheet

 

  1,077,585  863,318

Off balance sheet:

    

Acceptances and endorsements

  365  287

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  35,692  31,252

Commitments

 

  192,639  205,504

Total off balance sheet

 

  228,696  237,043

Total maximum exposure at 31st December

 

  1,306,281  1,100,361

229

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

Whilst the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of the assets, or, in the case of off-balance sheet items the amount guaranteed, committed, accepted or endorsed, in most cases the likely exposure is far less due to collateral, credit enhancements and other actions taken to mitigate the Group’s exposure, described below for each class of financial instrument:

AssetNature of collateral obtained or other credit risk mitigation

Cash with central banks, items in the course of collection, and loans and advances to banks

Due to the nature of the counterparties, collateral is generally not sought on these balances which are considered to be low risk.
Trading portfolio

The credit risk of these assets is reflected in their fair values. No collateral or enhancements are obtained directly from the issuer or counterparty but may be implicit in the terms of the instrument.

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

The credit risk of these assets is reflected in their fair values. Debt securities may be collateralised, according to their terms. Loans and advances included in this category may be collateralised.

Derivatives

Credit risk is also minimised where possible through netting agreements whereby derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty can be offset. Collateral will also be sought, depending on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and/or nature of the transaction.

Loans and advances to customers

–  Residential mortgage loans

These are secured by a fixed charge over the property. In addition, portfolios may be securitised.

–  Credit card receivables

This lending is generally unsecured. Balances may be securitised.

–  Other personal lending

In general this is unsecured. For certain personal lending, a charge over the borrower’s property or other assets may be sought.

–  Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

Various forms of collateral may be sought for these loans, often in the form of a fixed charge over the borrower’s property and a floating charge over the current assets of a corporate borrower. Loan covenants may be put in place to safeguard the bank’s financial position. If the exposure is sufficiently large, either individually or at the portfolio level, credit protection in the form of guarantees, credit derivatives or insurance may be taken out.

–  Finance lease receivables

The net investment in the lease is secured through retention of legal title to the leased assets.

Available for sale assets

No collateral or enhancements are obtained although collateral may be inherent in the structure of the asset.

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

These loans are fully collateralised with the securities legally transferred to the Group. The level of collateral is monitored daily and further collateral calls made when required.

Off balance sheet

The Group applies the same risk management policies for off balance sheet risks as it does for its on balance sheet risks. Collateral may be sought, depending on the strength of the counterparty and/or nature of the transaction.

Acceptances and endorsements

Amounts paid are normally repaid by the customer on presentation.

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as security

The Group is only required to meet its obligations should the customer default, in which case the Group will generally have recourse to the customer.

Commitments

These are commitments to future lending and are subject to the Group’s normal lending policies including taking collateral depending on the customers’ circumstances.

Financial assets that would be past due or impaired had their terms not been renegotiated

Financial assets are generally renegotiated either as part of an ongoing customer relationship or in response to an adverse change in the circumstances of the borrower. In the latter case renegotiation can result in an extension of the due date of payment or repayment plans under which the Group offers a concessionary rate of interest to genuinely distressed borrowers. This will result in the asset continuing to be overdue (delinquent) and will be individually impaired where the renegotiated payments of interest and principal will not recover the original carrying amount of the asset. In other cases, renegotiation will lead to a new agreement, which is treated as a new loan.

Credit risk concentrations

A concentration of credit risk exists when a number of counterparties are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions.

The analyses of credit risk concentrations presented below are based on the location of the counterparty or customer or the industry in which they are engaged, otherwise, the product type in accordance with the manner in which the Group manages credit risk.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

230


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

Analyses of the Group’s credit exposure are set out below:

Credit risk concentrations by geographical sector

  2007
   United

Kingdom

£m

  Other

European

Union

£m

  United

States

£m

  Africa

£m

  Rest of

the

World

£m

  Total

£m

On balance sheet:

            

Cash and balances at central banks

  1,458  2,170  206  1,406  561  5,801

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  1,638  75    110  13  1,836

Trading portfolio

  28,959  41,675  53,208  877  31,933  156,652

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  15,713  5,907  20,396  958  8,279  51,253

Derivative financial instruments

  60,534  75,017  82,975  2,229  27,333  248,088

Loans and advances to banks

  5,515  11,102  13,443  2,581  7,479  40,120

Loans and advances to customers

  187,824  56,189  39,944  38,653  22,788  345,398

Available for sale financial investments

  5,934  18,354  7,818  2,944  6,346  41,396

Reverse repurchase agreements

  42,160  51,734  67,018  2,156  20,007  183,075

Other assets

 

  1,813  617  424  698  414  3,966

Total on balance sheet

 

  351,548  262,840  285,432  52,612  125,153  1,077,585

Off balance sheet:

            

Acceptances and endorsements

  227  5  5  34  94  365

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  7,377  1,468  23,696  1,286  1,865  35,692

Commitments

 

  90,964  23,946  48,657  20,471  8,601  192,639

Total off balance sheet

 

  98,568  25,419  72,358  21,791  10,560  228,696

Total

 

  450,116  288,259  357,790  74,403  135,713  1,306,281

Credit risk concentrations by geographical sector

 

      
  2006
   United

Kingdom

£m

  Other

European

Union

£m

  United

States

£m

  Africa

£m

  Rest of

the

World

£m

  Total

£m

On balance sheet:

            

Cash and balances at central banks

  4,367  2,275  109  515  79  7,345

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  2,296  21    82  9  2,408

Trading portfolio assets

  27,900  30,508  55,674  762  30,535  145,379

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  9,969  4,559  10,951  244  2,365  28,088

Derivative financial instruments

  44,022  41,424  35,485  1,639  15,783  138,353

Loans and advances to banks

  6,227  8,511  9,056  2,219  4,913  30,926

Loans and advances to customers

  168,043  43,121  25,577  31,274  14,285  282,300

Available for sale financial investments

  9,262  22,288  9,132  2,287  7,363  50,332

Reverse repurchase agreements

  33,544  41,725  73,415  1,147  24,259  174,090

Other assets

 

  1,288  1,433  237  982  157  4,097

Total on balance sheet

 

  306,918  195,865  219,636  41,151  99,748  863,318

Off balance sheet:

            

Acceptances and endorsements

  220  6    47  14  287

Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security

  5,210  3,489  19,682  1,196  1,675  31,252

Commitments

 

  88,731  27,355  56,546  20,880  11,992  205,504

Total off balance sheet

 

  94,161  30,850  76,228  22,123  13,681  237,043

Total

 

  401,079  226,715  295,864  63,274  113,429  1,100,361

231

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

Credit risk concentrations by industrial sector

  2007
   Government

and Central

Banks

£m

  Financial

Services

£m

  Transport,

Postal and
communication
and

Business

and other

services

£m

  Agriculture,

Manufacturing

and

Wholesale

and retail

trade

£m

  Construction

and

Property

£m

  Energy

and

water

£m

  Residential

mortgage

loans

£m

  Other

personal

lending

£m

  Finance

lease

receivables

£m

  Total

£m

On balance sheet:                    
Cash and balances at central banks  5,801                  5,801
Items in the course of collection from other banks  8  1,828                1,836
Trading portfolio assets  58,608  83,790  4,434  3,928  924  4,072  895  1    156,652
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  10,914  23,742  570  699  11,325  396  3,509  98    51,253
Derivative financial instruments  2,886  227,609  2,771  5,567  1,106  8,031  87  31    248,088
Loans and advances to banks  7,881  32,239                40,120
Loans and advances to customers  2,036  70,699  41,678  37,722  22,288  8,623  111,955  39,320  11,077  345,398
Available for sale financial investments  8,880  29,693  2,142  249  167  246    19    41,396
Reverse repurchase agreements  1,713  179,459  416  735  752          183,075

Other assets

 

  270  1,506  542  307  168  5  112  1,056    3,966

Total on balance sheet

 

  98,997  650,565  52,553  49,207  36,730  21,373  116,558  40,525  11,077  1,077,585
Off balance sheet:                    
Acceptances and endorsements    125  111  91  21  4    13    365
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security  51  17,021  12,847  1,867  538  2,687  1  680    35,692

Commitments

 

  4,511

 

  30,492

 

  26,370

 

  32,388

 

  11, 282

 

  9,961

 

  10,969

 

  66,666

 

  

 

  192,639

 

Total off balance sheet

 

  4,562

 

  47,638

 

  39,328

 

  34,346

 

  11,841

 

  12,652

 

  10,970

 

  67,359

 

  

 

  228,696

 

Total

 

  103,559  698,203  91,881  83,553  48,571  34,025  127,528  107,884  11,077  1,306,281

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

232


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

Credit risk concentrations by industrial sector

   2006
   Government
and Central
Banks

£m

  Financial
Services

£m

  Transport,
Postal and
communication
and Business
and other
services

£m

  Agriculture,
Manufacturing
and
Wholesale
and retail
trade

£m

  Construction
and
Property

£m

  Energy
and
water

£m

  Residential
mortgage
loans

£m

  Other
personal
lending

£m

  Finance
lease
receivables

£m

  Total

£m

On balance sheet:                    
Cash and balances at central banks  7,345                  7,345
Items in the course of collection from other banks  5  2,403                2,408
Trading portfolio assets  56,222  78,322  2,793  3,333  792  3,043  871  3    145,379

Financial assets designated at fair value held on

own account

  6,412  12,101  269  325  6,797  162  2,022      28,088
Derivative financial instruments  1,701  119,812  2,496  5,945  642  7,681  53  23    138,353
Loans and advances to banks  2,221  28,705                30,926
Loans and advances to customers  2,426  45,033  34,543  34,755  20,542  6,810  94,511  33,538  10,142  282,300
Available for sale financial investments  10,055  39,105  733  9  141  257  31  1    50,332
Reverse repurchase agreements  1,205  171,146  107  435  918  20    259    174,090

Other assets

 

  43  2,637  469  78  97  5    768    4,097

Total on balance sheet

 

  87,635

 

  499,264

 

  41,410

 

  44,880

 

  29,929

 

  17,978

 

  97,488

 

  34,592

 

  10,142

 

  863,318

 

Off balance sheet:                    
Acceptances and endorsements  11  99  38  114  21  1  1  2    287
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security  12  20,999  4,313  1,915  907  2,900  9  197    31,252

Commitments

 

  4,914  49,917  23,807  29,164  15,263  12,401  19,375  50,663    205,504

Total off balance sheet

 

  4,937

 

  71,015

 

  28,158

 

  31,193

 

  16,191

 

  15,302

 

  19,385

 

  50,862

 

  

 

  237,043

 

Total

 

  92,572  570,279  69,568  76,073  46,120  33,280  116,873  85,454  10,142  1,100,361

233

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

Financial assets subject to credit risk

For the purposes of the Group’s disclosures regarding credit quality, its financial assets have been analysed as follows:

  As at 31st December 2007
   Neither past
due nor
individually
impaired
£m
  Past due
but not
individually
impaired
£m
  Individually
impaired
£m
  Total

£m

  Impairment
allowance

£m

 
 

 

 Total
carrying
value

£m

Cash and balances at central banks  5,801      5,801    5,801
Items in the course of collection from other banks  1,836      1,836    1,836
Trading portfolio  156,652      156,652    156,652
Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account  50,896  357    51,253    51,253
Derivatives  248,088      248,088    248,088
Loans and advances to banks  37,601  2,522    40,123  (3) 40,120
Loans and advances to customers  324,318  16,005  8,844  349,167  (3,769) 345,398
Available for sale financial investments  41,304  92    41,396    41,396
Reverse repurchase agreements  183,075      183,075    183,075

Other assets

 

  3,966      3,966    3,966

 

Total

 

  

 

1,053,537

  

 

18,976

  

 

8,844

  

 

1,081,357

  

 

(3,772

 

)

 

 

1,077,585

   As at 31st December 2006
    Neither past
due nor
individually
impaired
£m
  Past due
but not
individually
impaired
£m
  Individually
impaired
£m
  Total
£m
  

Impairment
allowance

£m

  

Total
carrying
value

£m

 

Cash and balances at central banks

  7,345      7,345    7,345

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  2,408      2,408    2,408

Trading portfolio

  145,379      145,379    145,379

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

  28,088      28,088    28,088

Derivatives

  138,353      138,353    138,353

Loans and advances to banks

  29,355  1,575    30,930  (4) 30,926

Loans and advances to customers

  270,321  10,989  4,321  285,631  (3,331) 282,300

Available for sale financial investments

  50,156  176    50,332    50,332

Reverse repurchase agreements

  174,090      174,090    174,090

Other assets

 

  4,097      4,097    4,097

Total

 

  849,592  12,740  4,321  866,653  (3,335) 863,318

Financial assets designated at fair value, derivatives, and trading portfolios are not subject to impairment allowances as credit losses are fully reflected in their fair values.

The impairment allowance above includes allowances against financial assets that have been individually impaired and those subject to collective impairment. Assets subject to a collective impairment allowance are included in financial assets neither past due nor individually impaired or financial assets past due but not individually impaired, as appropriate.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

234


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

(a) Credit quality of financial assets neither past due nor individually impaired

The credit quality of financial assets subject to credit risk, that were neither past due nor impaired, based on the credit ratings on page 227, was as follows:

   2007
    Strong
£m
  Satisfactory
£m
  Weak/sub-
standard
£m
  Total £m

Cash and balances at central banks

 

 ��5,801      5,801

Items in the course of collection from other banks

 

  1,713  123    1,836

Trading portfolio:

        

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  1,984  110    2,094

Debt securities

  143,161  8,958  659  152,778

Traded loans

 

  223  1,228  329  1,780

Total trading portfolio

 

  145,368  10,296  988  156,652

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

        

Loans and advances

  13,844  6,186  3,104  23,134

Debt securities

  10,010  14,207    24,217

Other financial assets

 

  3,541  4    3,545

Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

 

  27,395  20,397  3,104  50,896

Derivative financial instruments

 

  243,491  3,630  967  248,088

Loans and advances to banks

 

  35,635  1,955  11  37,601

Loans and advances to customers:

        

Residential mortgage loans

  62,748  41,144  1,761  105,653

Credit card receivables

    12,582  5  12,587

Other personal lending

  2,882  19,915  889  23,686

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  114,695  54,380  2,427  171,502

Finance lease receivables

 

  4,586  6,036  268  10,890

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  184,911  134,057  5,350  324,318

Available for sale financial investments:

        

Debt securities

  36,623  1,528  430  38,581

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

 

  2,130  593    2,723

Total available for sale financial investments:

 

  38,753  2,121  430  41,304

Reverse repurchase agreements

 

  180,637  2,391  47  183,075

Other assets

 

  2,410  1,452  104  3,966

Total financial assets neither past due nor individually impaired

 

  866,114  176,422  11,001  1,053,537

235

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

(a) Credit quality of financial assets neither past due nor individually impaired (continued)

  2006
   Strong
£m
  Satisfactory
£m
  Weak/sub-
standard
£m
  Total

£m

Cash and balances at central banks

 

  7,345      7,345

Items in the course of collection from other banks

 

  1,814  594    2,408

Trading portfolio:

        

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  2,947  13    2,960

Debt securities

  133,230  5,907  1,439  140,576

Traded loans

 

  405  1,425  13  1,843

Total trading portfolio

 

  136,582  7,345  1,452  145,379

Financial assets designated at fair value:

        

Loans and advances

  10,586  2,228  382  13,196

Debt securities

  5,307  6,793    12,100

Other financial assets

 

  2,637  155    2,792

Total financial assets designated at fair value

 

  18,530  9,176  382  28,088

Derivative financial instruments held on own account

 

  133,980  4,194  179  138,353

Loans and advances to banks

 

  29,008  336  11  29,355

Loans and advances to customers:

        

Residential mortgage loans

  53,760  34,019  1,316  89,095

Credit card receivables

    11,858  49  11,907

Other personal lending

  2,832  16,652  110  19,594

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  92,912  44,583  2,295  139,790

Finance lease receivables

 

  4,481  5,349  105  9,935

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  153,985  112,461  3,875  270,321

Available for sale financial investments:

        

Debt securities

  47,687  49    47,736

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

 

  2,313  107    2,420

Total available for sale financial investments:

 

  50,000  156    50,156

Reverse repurchase agreements

 

  171,725  856  1,509  174,090

Other assets

 

  2,548  1,546  3  4,097

Total financial assets neither past due nor individually impaired

 

  705,517  136,664  7,411  849,592

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

236


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

(b) Financial assets that are past due but not individually impaired

An age analysis of financial assets that are past due but not individually impaired is set out below.

For the purposes of this analysis an asset is considered past due and included below when any payment due under the strict contractual terms is received late or missed. The amount included is the entire financial asset, not just the payment, of principal or interest or both, overdue.

The Group expends considerable effort in monitoring overdue assets. Assets may be overdue for a number of reasons, including late processing of payments or documentation, for example, over weekends and holiday periods. Where assets are considered to be uncollectable they are subject to individual impairment.

Trading portfolio and derivative assets are measured on a fair value basis such that their carrying amount reflects expected defaults. Amounts that are past due as a result of counterparty credit issues are not significant.

  2007
   Past
due

up to 1
month
£m

  Past
due

1-2
months
£m

  Past
due

2-3
months
£m

  Past
due

3-6
months
£m

  Past

due
6 months
and over
£m

  Total
£m

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

            

Loans and advances

 

  261  4  1  24  67  357

Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

 

  261  4  1  24  67  357

Loans and advances to banks

 

  2,031  305  186      2,522

Loans and advances to customers:

            

Residential mortgage loans

  3,609  1,349  456  215  184  5,813

Credit card receivables

  558  155  107  205  1  1,026

Other personal lending

  271  199  193  152  205  1,020

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  6,970  622  267  62  66  7,987

Finance lease receivables

 

  75  28  18  38    159

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  11,483  2,353  1,041  672  456  16,005

Available for sale financial investments:

            

Debt securities

 

  92          92

Total available for sale financial investments:

 

  92          92

Total financial assets past due but not individually impaired

 

  13,867  2,662  1,228  696  523  18,976

  2006
   Past
due

up to 1
month
£m

  Past
due 1-2
months
£m
  Past
due 2-3
months
£m
  Past

due
3-6 months
£m

  Past

due
6 months
and over
£m

  Total
£m

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account

            

Loans and advances

 

            

Total financial assets designated at fair value held on own

account

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Loans and advances to banks

 

  1,004  234  337      1,575

Loans and advances to customers:

            

Residential mortgage loans

  3,394  1,124  280  208  150  5,156

Credit card receivables

  622  202  144  304    1,272

Other personal lending

  276  118  119  253  1  767

Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  3,322  130  180  20  53  3,705

Finance lease receivables

 

  35  10  22  22    89

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  7,649  1,584  745  807  204  10,989

Available for sale financial investments:

            

Debt securities

 

  131  22    23    176

Total available for sale financial investments:

 

  131  22    23    176

Total financial assets past due but not individually impaired

 

  8,784  1,840  1,082  830  204  12,740

237

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

47 Credit risk (continued)

(c) Impaired financial assets

Financial assets individually assessed as impaired

An analysis of financial assets individually assessed as impaired is as follows:

   2007  2006
   Original
carrying
amount
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
 
 
 
 Revised
carrying
amount
£m
  Original
carrying
amount
£m
  Impairment
allowance
£m
 
 
 
 Revised
carrying
amount
£m
       
Loans and advances to customers:                  
Residential mortgage loans  621  (88) 533  384  (75) 309
Credit card receivables  1,517  (725) 792  1,250  (839) 411
Other personal lending  1,635  (1,030) 605  1,289  (954) 335
Wholesale and corporate loans and advances  4,930  (944) 3,986  1,280  (589) 691

Finance lease receivables

 

  141  (102) 39  118  (79) 39

Total loans and advances to customers individually impaired

 

  8,844  (2,889)  5,955  4,321  (2,536)  1,785

Collective impairment allowance

 

      (883)          (799)    

Total impairment allowance

 

      (3,772)          (3,335)    

In addition to the above, there are impaired available for sale debt securities with a carrying value at 31st December 2007 of £432m, after a write-down of £13m. In 2006, all impaired available for sale debt securities had been disposed of prior to 31st December.

The movements on the impairment allowance during the year were as follows:

  2007
    At
beginning
of year
£m
  Acquisitions
and
disposals
£m
  Unwind
of
discount
£m
  Exchange
and other
adjustments
£m
  Amounts
written
off
£m
  Recoveries
£m
  Amounts
charged to
income
statement
£m
  Balance
at 31st
December
£m

Loans and advances to banks

 

  4        (1)  13  (13)  3
Loans and advances to customers:                        
Residential mortgage loans  124      2  (5)  5  6  132
Credit card receivables  1,030  (75)  (60)  4  (819)  103  658  841
Other personal lending  1,139    (53)  10  (668)  54  891  1,373
Wholesale and corporate loans and
advances
  939  1    37  (440)  46  727  1,310

Finance lease receivables

 

  99  1      (30)  6  37  113

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  3,331  (73)  (113)  53  (1,962)  214  2,319  3,769

Total impairment allowance

 

  3,335  (73)  (113)  53  (1,963)  227  2,306  3,772
  2006
    At
beginning
of year
£m
  Acquisitions
and
disposals
£m
  Unwind
of
discount
£m
  Exchange
and other
adjustments
£m
  Amounts
written off
£m
  Recoveries
£m
  Amounts
charged to
income
statement
£m
  Balance
at 31st
December
£m

Loans and advances to banks

 

  4          33  (33)  4
Loans and advances to customers:                        
Residential mortgage loans  139    (8)  (8)  (51)  14  38  124
Credit card receivables  978    (66)  (21)  (887)  101  925  1,030
Other personal lending  975    (22)  (42)  (557)  63  722  1,139
Wholesale and corporate loans and
advances
  1,253  (12)  (2)  (69)  (626)  41  354  939

Finance lease receivables

 

  101  (11)    (13)  (53)  7  68  99

Total loans and advances to customers

 

  3,446  (23)  (98)  (153)  (2,174)  226  2,107  3,331

Total impairment allowance

 

  3,450  (23)  (98)  (153)  (2,174)  259  2,074  3,335

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

238


LOGO

47 Credit risk (continued)

Collateral and other credit enhancements held

Financial assets that are past due or individually assessed as impaired may be partially or fully collateralised or subject to other forms of credit enhancement.

Assets in these categories subject to collateralisation are mainly corporate and residential mortgage loans.

For corporate loans, security may be in the form of floating charges where the value of the collateral varies with the level of assets such as inventory and receivables held by the customer. For these and other reasons collateral given is only accurately valued on origination of the loan or in the course of enforcement actions and as a result it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the collateral held.

A description and the estimated fair value of collateral held in respect of residential mortgage loans that are past due or individually assessed as impaired was as follows:

   2007  2006
    Fair
value
£m
  Fair
value
£m

Nature of assets

    

– Residential Property

 

  6,488  6,183

Total

 

  6,488  6,183

Collateral included in the above table reflects the Group’s interest in the property in the event of default.That held in the form of charges against residential property in the UK is restricted to the outstanding loan balance. In other territories, where the Group is not obliged to return any sale proceeds to the mortgagee, the full estimated fair value has been included.

Collateral and other credit enhancements obtained

The carrying value of assets held by the Group as at 31st December 2007 as a result of the enforcement of collateral was as follows:

  2007  2006
   Carrying
Amount
£m
  Carrying
Amount
£m

Nature of assets

    

– Residential Property

  34  12

– Commercial and industrial property

  1  2

– Other credit enhancements

 

    

Total

 

  35  14

The Group does not use assets obtained in its operations. Assets obtained are normally sold, generally at auction, or realised in an orderly manner for the maximum benefit of the Group, the borrower and the borrower’s other creditors in accordance with the relevant insolvency regulations.

 

239 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 261


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

47 Credit risk(continued)

Debt securities

Trading portfolio assets, financial assets designated at fair value and available for sale assets are measured on a fair value basis. The fair value will reflect, among other things, the credit risk of the issuer.

Most listed and some unlisted securities are rated by external rating agencies. The Group mainly uses external credit ratings provided by Standard & Poors’ or Moody’s. Where such ratings are not available or are not current, the Group will use its own internal ratings for the securities.

An analysis of the credit quality of the Group’s debt securities is set out below:

    2008  2007
    

AAA to BBB-
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B- and
below
£m
  

Total

£m

  

AAA to BBB-
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B- and
below
£m
  

Total

£m

 

Trading portfolio:

                

Treasury and other eligible bills

  4,491  53    4,544  1,984  110    2,094

Debt securities

 

  141,454  5,556  1,676  148,686  143,161  8,958  659  152,778

 

Total trading portfolio

 

  

 

145,945

  

 

5,609

  

 

1,676

  

 

153,230

  

 

145,145

  

 

9,068

  

 

659

  

 

154,872

 

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:

                

Debt securities

 

  1,222  7,406    8,628  10,010  14,207    24,217

 

Available for sale financial investments:

                

Treasury and other eligible bills

  2,823  1,180    4,003  2,130  593    2,723

Debt securities

 

  55,817  2,347  667  58,831  36,623  1,528  522  38,673

 

Total available for sale financial investments

 

  

 

58,640

  

 

3,527

  

 

667

  

 

62,834

  

 

38,753

  

 

2,121

  

 

522

  

 

41,396

 

Total debt securities

 

  

 

205,807

  

 

16,542

  

 

2,343

  

 

224,692

  

 

193,908

  

 

25,396

  

 

1,181

  

 

220,485

 

%

 

  

 

91.6

  

 

7.4

  

 

1.0

  

 

100.0

  

 

88.0

  

 

11.5

  

 

0.5

  

 

100

In addition to the above, there are impaired available for sale debt securities with a carrying value at 31st December 2008 of £329m (2007: £432m), after a write-down of £363m (2007: £13m).

Collateral is not generally obtained directly from the issuers of debt securities. Certain debt securities may be collateralised by specifically identified assets that would be obtained in the event of default.

Derivatives

Derivatives are measured on a fair value basis.

The credit quality of the Group’s derivative assets according to the credit quality of the counterparty at 31st December 2008 and 2007 was as follows:

    2008  2007
    

AAA to BBB-
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B– and
below
£m
  

Total

£m

  

AAA–BBB-
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B– and
below
£m
  Total
£m

 

Derivatives

 

  

 

939,071

  

 

42,266

  

 

3,465

  

 

984,802

  

 

243,491

  

 

3,630

  

 

967

  

 

248,088

 

%

 

  

 

95.3

  

 

4.3

  

 

0.4

  

 

100.0

  

 

98.1

  

 

1.5

  

 

0.4

  

 

100.0

Credit risk from derivatives is mitigated where possible through netting agreements whereby derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty can be offset. Group policy requires all netting arrangements to be legally documented. The ISDA Master Agreement is the Group’s preferred agreement for documenting OTC derivatives. It provides the contractual framework within which dealing activities across a full range of OTC products are conducted and contractually binds both parties to apply close-out netting across all outstanding transactions covered by an agreement if either party defaults or other pre-determined events occur.

Collateral is obtained against derivative assets, depending on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and/or nature of the transaction. Any collateral taken in respect of OTC trading exposures will be subject to a ‘haircut’ which is negotiated at the time of signing the collateral agreement. A haircut is the valuation percentage applicable to each type of collateral and will be largely based on liquidity and price volatility of the underlying security. The collateral obtained for derivatives is either cash, direct debt obligation government (G14+) bonds denominated in the domestic currency of the issuing country, debt issued by supranationals or letters of credit issued by an institution with a long-term unsecured debt rating of A+/A3 or better. Where the Group has ISDA master agreements, the collateral document will be the ISDA Credit Support Annex (CSA). The collateral document must give Barclays the power to realise any collateral placed with it in the event of the failure of the counterparty, and to place further collateral when requested or in the event of insolvency, administration or similar processes, as well as in the case of early termination.

Derivative assets and liabilities would be £917,074m (2007: £215,585m) lower than reported if netting were permitted for assets and liabilities with the same counterparty or for which the Group holds cash collateral.

262

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

47 Credit risk(continued)

Reverse repurchase agreements

Reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing arrangements are collateralised loans typically of short maturities.

The loans are fully collateralised with highly liquid securities legally transferred to the Group. The level of collateral is monitored daily and further collateral called when required.

    2008  2007
    

AAA to BBB–
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B– and
below
£m
  

Total

£m

  

AAA to BBB–
(investment
grade)

£m

  BB+ to B
£m
  B– and
below
£m
  

Total

£m

 

Financial assets designated at fair value held on own account:

                

Other financial assets

  3,882  3,401    7,283  3,056      3,056

Reverse repurchase agreements

 

  122,188  6,101  2,065  130,354  180,637  2,391  47  183,075

 

Total Reverse repurchase agreements

 

  

 

126,070

  

 

9,502

  

 

2,065

  

 

137,637

  

 

183,693

  

 

2,391

  

 

47

  

 

186,131

 

%

 

  

 

91.6

  

 

6.9

  

 

1.5

  

 

100.0

  

 

98.7

  

 

1.3

  

 

  

 

100.0

No reverse repurchase agreements held by the Group at 31st December 2008 or 2007 were individually impaired, however during the year, the Group wrote off £124m of reverse repurchase agreements (2007: £nil).

Other credit risk assets

The Group’s other assets that are subject to credit risk are cash with central banks of £30,019m (2007: £5,801m), items in course of collection from other Banks £1,695m (2007: £1,836m), other financial assets £3,096m (2007: £3,966m).

Cash and balances at central banks

Substantially all balances are held with central banks. There is limited credit risk in relation to balances at central banks.

Items in the course of collection from other banks

There is limited credit risk in relation to items in the course of collection through the clearing system from other banks.

Other financial assets

Other financial assets comprise £3,096m (2007: £3,966m) of other assets and £609m (2007: £548m) of assets held at fair value.

Off-balance sheet

The Group applies fundamentally the same risk management policies for off-balance sheet risks as it does for its on-balance sheet risks. In the case of committments to lend, customers and counterparties will be subject to the same credit management policies as for loans and advances. Collateral may be sought depending on the strength of the counterparty and the nature of the transaction.

Credit market exposures

Barclays Capital’s credit market exposures primarily relate to US residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and leveraged finance businesses that have been significantly impacted by the continued deterioration in the global credit markets. The exposures include both significant positions subject to fair value movements in the profit and loss account and positions that are classified as loans and advances and available for sale. None of the exposure disclosed below has been reclassified to loans and advances under the amendments to IAS 39.

The exposures are set out by asset class below:

US Residential Mortgages  As at
31.12.08
£m
  As at
31.12.07
£m

 

ABS CDO Super Senior

 

  

 

3,104

  

 

4,671

 

Other US sub- prime

 

  

 

3,441

  

 

5,037

 

Alt-A

 

  

 

4,288

  

 

4,916

 

US RMBS exposure wrapped by monoline insurers

 

  

 

1,639

  

 

730

 

Commercial mortgages

 

      

 

Commercial real estate

  11,578  11,103

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

  735  1,296

CMBS exposure wrapped by monoline insurers

 

  1,854  197

 

Other Credit Market Exposures

 

      

 

Leveraged finance

 

  

 

10,391

  

 

9,027

 

SIVs and SIV-Lites

 

  

 

963

  

 

784

 

CDPCs

 

  

 

150

  

 

19

 

CLO and other exposure wrapped by monoline insurers

 

  

 

4,939

  

 

408

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

263


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

48 Market risk

Market risk management

Market risk is the risk that Barclays earnings or capital, or its ability to meet business objectives, will be adversely affected by changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices such as interest rates, credit spreads, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign exchange rates. Market risk mainly arises from trading activities. Barclays is also exposed to market risk through interest rate risk on its non-trading activities and through the pension fund.

Organisation and structure

The Board approves market risk appetite for trading and non-trading activities. The Market Risk Director is responsible for the Market Risk Control Framework and, under delegated authority from the Group Risk Director, sets a limit framework within the context of the approved market risk appetite. A daily market risk report summarises Barclays market risk exposures against agreed limits. This daily report is sent to the Group Risk Director, the Market Risk Director, the Group Finance Director and the appropriate Business Risk Directors.

The head of each business, assisted by the business risk management team, is accountable for all market risks associated with its activities. Each business is responsible for the identification, measurement, management, control and reporting of market risk as outlined in Barclays Market Risk Control Framework. Oversight and support is provided to the business by the Market Risk Director, assisted by the central market risk team. The Market Risk Committee reviews, approves, and makes recommendations concerning the market risk profile across Barclays including risk appetite, limits and utilisation. The Committee meets monthly and is chaired by the Market Risk Director. Attendees include the Risk Director, respective business risk managers and senior managers from the central market risk team.

Traded market risk

Barclays policy is to concentrate trading activities in Barclays Capital. This includes transactions where Barclays Capital acts as principal with clients or with the market. For maximum efficiency, client and market activities are managed together.

Risk measurement and control

The measurement techniques used to measure and control traded market risk include Daily Value at Risk (DVaR), Expected Shortfall (ES), stress testing and scenario testing.

DVaR is an estimate of the potential loss arising from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day. Barclays Capital uses the historical simulation method with a two year unweighted historical period.

In 2008, the confidence level was changed to 95% from 98% as an increasing incidence of significant market movements made the existing measure more volatile and less effective for risk management purposes. Switching to 95% made DVaR more stable and consequently improved management, transparency and control of the market risk profile.

The historical simulation calculation can be split into three parts:

– Calculate hypothetical daily profit or loss for each position over the most recent two years, using observed daily market moves.

– Sum hypothetical profit or losses, for day 1 giving one total profit or loss. This is repeated for all other days in the two year history.

– DVaR is the 95th percentile selected from the two years of daily hypothetical total profit or loss.

The DVaR model has been approved by the FSA to calculate regulatory capital for the trading book. The approval covers general market risk in interest rate, foreign exchange, commodities and equity products, and issuer specific risk for the majority of single name and portfolio traded credit products.

DVaR is an important market risk measurement and control tool and consequently the model is regularly assessed. The main approach employed is the technique known as back-testing which counts the number of days when a loss (as defined by the FSA in BIPRU 7.10), exceeds the corresponding DVaR estimate, measured at the 99% confidence level.

The FSA categorises a DVaR model as green (being best), amber or red. A green model is consistent with a good working DVaR model and is achieved for models that have four or less back-testing exceptions in a 12-month period. For Barclays Capital’s trading book, green model status was maintained for 2008 and 2007.

264

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

48 Market risk(continued)

To further improve the control framework, formal daily monitoring of ES was started. This metric is the average of all the hypothetical losses beyond DVaR. Other controls, includes stress testing and scenario testing.

Stress testing provides an indication of the potential size of losses that could arise in extreme conditions. It helps to identify risk concentrations across business lines and assist senior management in capital planning decisions. A variety of different types of stress tests are performed in order to fulfil the objectives of stress testing. The global asset class stress tests have been designed to cover major asset classes including interest rate, credit spread, commodity, equity, foreign exchange rates and emerging markets.

Stress results are produced at least fortnightly. If a potential stress loss exceeds the corresponding trigger limit, the positions captured by the stress test are reviewed and discussed by Barclays Capital market risk management and the respective Barclays Capital business heads. The minutes of the discussion, including the merits of the position and the appropriate course of action, are then sent to the Market Risk Director for review.

Scenario tests are hypothetical events which could lead to extreme yet plausible stress type moves under which profitability is seriously challenged. The scenarios are devised by senior risk managers and economists and are reviewed quarterly. Examples include ‘Global pandemic’, ‘Problems with GBP sovereign issuances’ and ‘Liquidity crisis’. The scenarios are calculated at least fortnightly and the results are included in the Traded Positions Risk Review meeting information pack.

Analysis of traded market risk exposures

Barclays Capital market risk exposure, as measured by average total DVaR (95%), increased by 64% to £53.4m in 2008. This was mainly due to higher market volatility within the credit spread and interest rate DVaRs.

Total DVaR increased significantly in the fourth quarter, mainly due to extreme market volatility following the failure of several financial intuitions and a material deterioration in the global economic outlook. Total DVaR (95%) at 31st December 2008 was £86.6m (31st December 2007: £39.6m), which was within limit.

On a 98% basis, average total DVaR increased 82% to £76.5m.

The daily average, maximum and minimum values of DVaR, 95% and 98%, were calculated as below.

DVaR (95%)

    

12 months to

31st December 2008

  

12 months to

31st December 2007

   

 

Average
£m

  High
£m
  Low
£m
  Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m

 

Interest rate risk

  28.9  47.8  15.1  15.3  26.5  10.0

Credit spread risk

  31.1  71.7  15.4  17.3  28.0  10.8

Commodity risk

  18.1  25.4  12.5  15.3  19.0  10.7

Equity risk

  9.1  21.0  4.8  8.0  12.1  4.5

Foreign exchange risk

  5.9  13.0  2.1  3.8  7.2  2.1

Diversification effecta

 

  (39.7) n/a  n/a  (27.2) n/a  n/a

Total DVaR

 

  53.4

 

 

 

 95.2

 

  35.5

 

  32.5

 

 

 

 40.9

 

  25.2

 

DVaR (98%)
   12 months to
31st December 2008
  

12 months to

31st December 2007

    

 

Average
£m

  High
£m
  Low
£m
  Average
£m
  High
£m
  Low
£m

 

Interest rate risk

  45.0  80.9  21.0  20.0  33.3  12.6

Credit spread risk

  54.0  143.4  30.1  24.9  43.3  14.6

Commodity risk

  23.9  39.6  16.5  20.2  27.2  14.8

Equity risk

  12.8  28.9  6.7  11.2  17.6  7.3

Foreign exchange risk

  8.1  21.0  2.9  4.9  9.6  2.9

Diversification effecta

 

  (67.3) n/a  n/a  (39.2) n/a  n/a

Total DVaR

 

  76.5

 

 

 

 158.8

 

  47.5

 

  42.0

 

 

 

 59.3

 

  33.1

 

The average ES in 2008 was £70.0m, a rise of £34.7m compared with 2007.

Note

aThe high (and low) DVaR figures reported for each category did not necessarily occur on the same day as the high (and low) DVaR reported as a whole. Consequently a diversification effect number for the high (and low) DVaR figures would not be meaningful and it is therefore omitted from the above table.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

265


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

48 Market risk(continued)

Non-trading interest rate risk

Non-traded interest rate risk arises from the provision of retail and wholesale (non-traded) banking products and services.

Barclays objective is to minimise non-traded risk. This is achieved by transferring risk from the business to a local treasury or Group Treasury, who in turn hedge the net exposure with the external market. Limits exist to ensure no material risk is retained within any business or product area. The majority of exposures are within Global Retail and Commercial Banking .

Risk measurement and control

The techniques used to measure and control non-traded interest rate risk include Annual Earnings at Risk, DVaR and Stress Testing. Book limits such as foreign exchange and interest position limits are also in place.

Annual Earnings at Risk (AEaR) measures the sensitivity of net interest income (NII) over the next 12 months. It is calculated as the difference between the estimated income using the current yield curve and the lowest estimated income following a 100 basis points increase or decrease in interest rates.

DVaR is also used as a complementary tool to AEaR.

Stress testing is also carried out by the business centres and is reviewed by senior management and business-level asset and liability committees. The stress testing is tailored to the business and typically incorporates scenario analysis and historical stress movements applied to respective portfolios.

Analysis of Net Interest Income sensitivity

The tables below show the pre-tax net interest income sensitivity for the non-trading financial assets and financial liabilities held at 31st December 2008. The sensitivity has been measured using AEaR methodology as described above. The benchmark interest rate for each currency is set as at 31st December 2008. The figures include the effect of hedging instruments but exclude exposures held or issued by Barclays Capital as these are measured and managed using DVaR.

Net interest in come sensitivity(AEaR) by currency

 

    +100 basis
points
2008 £m
  –100 basis
points
2008 £m
  +100 basis
points
2007 £m
  –100 basis
points
2007 £m
 

 

GBP

  3  (273) 36  (37)

USD

  (25) 7  (3) 1 

EUR

  (34) 30  (23) 23 

ZAR

  13  (13) 19  (19)

Others

 

    (8) 4  (5)

 

Total

 

  (43) (257) 33  (37)

 

As percentage of net interest in come

 

  (0.37%) (2.24%) 0.34%  (0.39%)

Non-traded interest rate risk, as measured by AEaR, was £257m in 2008, an increase of £220m compared to 2007. This estimate takes into account the rates in place as at 31st December 2008. The increase mainly reflects the reduced spread generated on retail and commercial banking liabilities in the lower interest rate environment. If the interest rate hedges had not been in place then the AEaR risk for 2008 would have been £670m.

DVaR is also used to control market risk in GRCB – Western Europe, and Group Treasury. The indicative average DVaRs for 2008, using a simplified DVaR approach, were £1.3m and £0.6m respectively.

Analysis of Equity sensitivity

 

    +100 basis
points
2008 £m
  –100 basis
points
2008 £m
  +100 basis
points
2007 £m
  –100 basis
points
2007 £m
 

 

Net interest income

  (43) (257) 33  (37)

Taxation effects on the above

 

  6  33  (9) 10 

 

Effect on profit for the year

 

  (37) (224) 24  (27)

 

As percentage of net profit after tax

 

  (0.70%) (4.24%) 0.47%  (0.53%)

 

Effect on profit for the year (per above)

  (37) (224) 24  (27)

Available for sale reserve

  (806) 806  (390) 390 

Cash flow hedging reserve

  (473) 474  (476) 476 

Taxation effects on the above

 

  166  (166) 242  (242)

 

Effect on equity

 

  (1,150) 890  (600) 597 

 

As a percentage of equity

 

  (2.43%) 1.88%  (1.85%) 1.84% 

266

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

48 Market risk(continued)

Foreign exchange risk

The Group is exposed to two sources of foreign exchange risk.

(a) Transactional foreign currency exposure

Transactional foreign exchange exposures represent exposure on banking assets and liabilities, denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting entity.

The Group’s risk management policies prevent the holding of significant open positions in foreign currencies outside the trading portfolio managed by Barclays Capital which is monitored through DVaR.

There were no material net transactional foreign currency exposures outside the trading portfolio at either 31st December 2008 or 2007. Due to the low level of non-trading exposures no reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates would have a material effect on either the Group’s profit or movements in equity for the year ended 31st December 2008 or 2007.

(b) Translational foreign exchange exposure

The Group’s translational foreign currency exposure arises from both its capital resources (including investments in subsidiaries and branches, intangible assets, minority interests and debt capital) and risk weighted assets denominated in non-Sterling currencies. Changes in foreign exchange rates result in changes in the Sterling equivalent value of non-Sterling denominated capital resources and risk weighted assets. As a result, the Group’s regulatory capital ratios are sensitive to foreign exchange rate movements.

The Group’s hedge strategy is to minimise the volatility of all capital ratios whilst taking into account the impact on hedging of non-Sterling net investments, the cost of hedging, the availability of a suitable foreign exchange market and prevailing foreign exchange rates.

To minimise volatility in the equity ratio, the Group aims over time to maintain the ratio of foreign currency equity capital resources to RWAs the same as the Group’s equity ratio. To create equity capital resources denominated in non-Sterling currencies, the Group leaves some investments in core non-Sterling subsidiaries and branches un-hedged. The resultant change in the Sterling value of the investments is captured in the currency translation reserve, resulting in an equity capital movement.

Depending on the value of non-Sterling net investments, it may not always be possible to maintain the ratio, leaving some capital ratio sensitivity to foreign exchange movements.

The proceeds from equity accounted foreign currency preference shares are also used in the equity ratio hedge. If a preference share is redeemed, the cumulative movement in the currency translation reserve will be offset by an equal and opposite movement in other reserves reflecting the revaluation of the preference shares to prevailing foreign exchange rates.

The exposure of Tier 1 and Total capital ratios is managed by issuing, where possible, debt capital in non-Sterling currencies such that the ratio of Tier 1 and total capital resources to risk weighted assets is the same as the Group’s Tier 1 and Total capital ratios. This is primarily achieved by the issuance of debt capital from Barclays Bank PLC in major currencies, but can also be achieved by subsidiaries issuing capital in local currencies.

The carrying value of the Group’s foreign currency net investments in subsidiaries and branches and the foreign currency borrowings and derivatives used to hedge them as at 31st December 2008 were as follows:

At 31st December 2008

Functional currency of the operation involved

 

  Foreign
currency
net
investments
£m
  Borrowings
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Derivatives
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  

Structural
currency
exposures
pre economic
hedges

£m

  Economic
hedges
£m
  Remaining
structural
currency
exposures
£m
 

 

United States Dollar

  14,577  6,019    8,558  6,720  1,838 

Euro

  6,336  2,922    3,414  3,125  289 

Rand

  3,725    1,306  2,419  164  2,255 

Japanese Yen

  5,009  801  4,212  (4)   (4)

Swiss Franc

  3,042  2,936  101  5    5 

Other

 

  2,940    880  2,060    2,060 

 

Total

 

  35,629  12,678  6,499  16,452  10,009  6,443 

At 31st December 2007

Functional currency of the operation involved

 

  Foreign
currency
net
investments
£m
  Borrowings
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  Derivatives
which hedge
the net
investments
£m
  

Structural
currency
exposures
pre economic
hedges

£m

  Economic
hedges
£m
  Remaining
structural
currency
exposures
£m
 

 

United States Dollar

  3,273  1,000    2,273  3,575  (1,302)

Euro

  3,690  1,506    2,184  2,387  (203)

Rand

  3,205    2,599  606  165  441 

Japanese Yen

  2,986  180  2,773  33    33 

Swiss Franc

  2,140    2,131  9    9 

Other

 

  1,847  53  465  1,329    1,329 

 

Total

 

  17,141  2,739  7,968  6,434  6,127  307 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

267


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

48 Market risk(continued)

The economic hedges represent the US Dollar and Euro Preference Shares and Reserve Capital Instruments in issue that are treated as equity under IFRS, and do not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes.

The impact of a change in the exchange rate between Sterling and any of the major currencies would be:

– A higher or lower Sterling equivalent value of non-Sterling denominated capital resources and risk weighted assets. This includes a higher or lower currency translation reserve within equity, representing the retranslation of non-Sterling subsidiaries, branches and associated undertakings net of the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on derivatives and borrowings designated as hedges of net investments.

– A higher or lower profit after tax, arising from changes in the exchange rates used to translate items in the consolidated income statement.

– A higher or lower value of available for sale investments denominated in foreign currencies, impacting the available for sale reserve.

49 Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk management and measurement

This is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its obligations when they fall due as a result of customer deposits being withdrawn, cash requirements from contractual commitments, or other cash outflows, such as debt maturities. Such outflows would deplete available cash resources for client lending, trading activities and investments. In extreme circumstances lack of liquidity could result in reductions in balance sheet and sales of assets, or potentially an inability to replace funds when they are withdrawn, with consequent failure to repay depositors and fulfil commitments to lend.lending commitments. The risk that it will be unable to meet its obligationsdo so is inherent in all banking operations and can be impactedaffected by a range of institution specificinstitution-specific and market-wide events including, but not limited to, credit events, merger and acquisition activity, systemic shocks and natural disasters.

Liquidity risk management and measurement

Liquidity management within the Group has several components.

Intraday liquidity

The need to monitor, manage and control intraday liquidity in real time is recognised by the Group as a mission critical process: any failure to meet specific intraday commitments would have significant consequences.consequences, such as visible market disruption.

The Group policy is that each operation must ensure that it has access to sufficient intraday liquidity to meet any obligations it may have to clearing and settlement systems. Major currency payment flows and payment system collateral are monitored and managed in real time to ensure that at all times there is sufficient collateral to make payments. The Group actively engages in payment system development to help ensure that new payment systems are robust.

Day to day funding

Day to day funding is managed by short-term mismatchthrough limits for the next day, weekon wholesale borrowings, secured borrowings and month which control cash flows tofunding mismatches. These ensure that requirements can be met.on any day and over any period there is a limited amount of refinancing required. These requirements include replenishmentreplacement of funds as theyliabilities mature or are borrowed by customers. The Retail and Commercial Bank together with Wealth maintain no reliance on wholesale funding. The Group maintains an active presence in global money markets through Barclays Capital, and monitors and manages the wholesale money market capacity for the Group’s name to enable that to happen.

In addition to cash flow management, Barclays Treasury also monitors unmatched medium-termterm mismatches between assets and liabilities, as well as the level and type of undrawn lending commitments, the usage of overdraft facilities and the impact of contingent liabilities such as standby letters of credit and guarantees.

Liquid Assetsassets

The Group maintains a portfolio of highly marketable assets including UK, US and Euro-area government bonds that can be sold or funded on a secured basis as protection against any unforeseen interruption to cash flow. The Group accesses secured funding markets in these assets on a regular basis to ensure market access.basis. The Group does not rely on committed funding lines for protection against unforeseen interruptioninterruptions to cash flow.

Diversification of liquidity sources

Sources of liquidity are regularly reviewed to maintain a wide diversification by currency, geography, provider, product and term. In addition, to avoid reliance on a particular group of customers or market sectors, the distribution of sources and the maturity profile of deposits are also carefully managed. Important factors in assuring liquidity are competitive ratesstrength of relationships and the maintenance of depositors’ confidence. Such confidence is based on a number of factors including the Group’s reputation and relationship with those clients, the strength of earnings and the Group’s financial position.

Structural liquidity

An important source of structural liquidity is provided by our core retail deposits in the UK, Europe and Africa, mainly current accounts and savings accounts. Although current accounts are repayable on demand and savings accounts at short notice, the Group’s broad base of customers – numerically and by depositor type – helps to protect against unexpected fluctuations. Such accounts form a stable funding base for the Group’s operations and liquidity needs.

The Group policy is to fund the balance sheet assets of the retailRetail and commercial bankCommercial Bank together with Wealth and Head office functions on a global basis with customer deposits and capital without recourse to the wholesale markets. This provides protection from the liquidity risk of wholesale market funding. The exception to this policy is ABSA,Absa, which has a large portion of wholesale funding due to the structural nature of the South African financial sector.

Stress testsScenario analysis and stress testing

Stress testing is undertaken to assess and plan for the impact of various scenarios which may put the Group’s liquidity at risk.

Treasury develops and monitors a range of stress tests on the Group’s projected cash flows. These stress scenarios include Barclays-specific scenarios such an unexpected rating downgrade and operational problems, and external scenarios such as Emerging Market crises, payment system disruption and macroeconomicmacro-economic shocks. The output informs both the liquidity mismatch limits and the Group’s contingency funding plan. This is maintained by Treasury and is aligned with the Group and country business resumption plans to encompass decision-making authorities, internal and external communication and, in the event of a systems failure, the restoration of liquidity management and payment systems.

The ability to raise funds is in part dependent on maintaining the Bank’s credit rating. The funding impact of a credit downgrade is regularly estimated.closely tracked. Whilst the impact of a single downgrade may affect the price at which funding is available, the effect on liquidity is not considered significantmaterial in overall Group terms.

 

268

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

240


LOGOLOGO

49 Liquidity risk(continued)

Year-end assessment of liquidity

Barclays maintained a strong liquidity profile in 2008, sufficient to absorb the impact of a stressed funding environment. The Group has access to a substantial pool of liquidity both in secured markets and from unsecured depositors including numerous foreign governments and central banks. In addition, our limited reliance on securitisations as a source of funding has meant that the uncertainty in securitisation markets has not impacted our liquidity risk profile.

Whilst funding markets were extremely difficult in the latter half of 2008, and particularly since September 2008, Barclays was able to increase available liquidity, extend the term of unsecured liabilities, and reduce reliance on unsecured funding. Barclays has participated in various government and central bank liquidity facilities, both to aid central banks implementation of monetary policy and support central bank initiatives, where participation has enabled the lengthening of the term of our refinancing. These facilities have improved access to term funding, and helped moderate money market rates.

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

The sum of liabilities in Global Retail and Commercial Banking, Barclays Wealth and Head office functions exceeds assets in those businesses. As a result they have no reliance on wholesale funding. The balance sheet is modelled to reflect behavioural experience in both assets and liabilities, and is managed to maintain a positive cash profile.

Throughout 2008 Global Retail and Commercial Banking continued to grow the amount of customer deposits despite competitive pressures.

Barclays Capital

Barclays Capital manages liquidity to be self-funding through wholesale sources, managing access to liquidity to ensure that potential cash outflows in a stressed environment are covered.

Funding reliability is maintained by accessing a wide variety of investors and geographies and by building and maintaining strong relationships with these providers of liquidity. The depositors include asset managers, money market funds, corporates, government bodies, central banks and other financial institutions. Deposits are predominantly sourced from Western Europe and North America.

Unsecured Funding

Additionally, unsecured funding is managed within specific term limits. The term of unsecured liabilities has been extended, with average life increasing year over year.

Our capital markets debt issuance includes issues of senior and subordinated debt in US registered offerings and medium-term note programmes and European medium-term note programs. Substantially all of our unsecured senior issuance is without covenants that trigger increased cost or accelerate maturity.

Secured Funding

Barclays funds securities based on liquidity characteristics. Limits are in place for each security asset class reflecting liquidity in the cash and financing markets for these assets. The vast majority of assets funded in repurchase and stock loan transactions are fundable within central bank facilities (excluding Bank of England Emergency facilities and the Federal Reserve Primary Dealer Credit Facility). These are largely composed of G7 government securities, US mortgage agency debentures and mortgage backed securities, investment grade corporate securities and listed equities.

Liquidity risk to secured funding is also mitigated by:

 

selecting reliable counterparties

maintaining term financing and by limiting the amount of overnight funding

limiting overall secured funding usage

48Readily available liquidity

Substantial resources are maintained to offset maturing deposits and debt. These readily available assets are sufficient to absorb stress level losses of liquidity from unsecured as well as contingent cash outflows, such as collateral requirements on ratings downgrades. The sources of liquidity and contingent liquidity are from a wide variety of sources, including deposits held with central banks and unencumbered securities.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

269


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

49 Liquidity risk(continued)

Contractual maturity of financial assets and liabilities

Details of contractual maturities for assets and liabilities form an important source of information for the management of liquidity risk. In order to more accurately reflect the expected behaviour of the Group’s assets and liabilities measurement and modelling of each is constructed. This forms the foundation of the liquidity controls.

The table below provides detail on the contractual maturity of all financial instruments and other assets and liabilities. Derivatives (other than those designated in a hedging relationship) and trading portfolio assets and liabilities which are included in the on demand column at their fair value. Liquidity risk on these items is not managed on the basis of contractual maturity since they are not held for settlement according to such maturity and will frequently be settled before contractual maturity at fair value. Derivatives designated in a hedging relationship are included according to their contractual maturity.

Financial assets designated at fair value in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts have been included in Other assets and Other liabilities as the Group is not exposed to liquidity risk arising from them; any request for funds from creditors would be met by simultaneously liquidating or transferring the related investment.investment

 

At 31st December 2007

 

  On
demand
£m
 
 
 
 Not more
than three
months
£m
 
 
 
 
 Over three
months
but not
more

than six
months
£m

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 Over six
months
but not
more
than one
year
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Over one
year

but not
more
than three
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over three
years

but not
more
than five
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over five
years

but not
more
than ten
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over

ten

years

£m

  Total

£m

Assets

           

Cash and balances at central banks

  4,785  1,016              5,801
Items in course of collection from other banks  1,651  185              1,836

Trading portfolio assets

  193,691                193,691
Financial assets designated at fair value:           

– held on own account

  1,901  3,202  657  3,029  13,882  7,022  10,637  16,299  56,629

Derivative financial instruments:

           

– held for trading

  246,950                246,950

– designated for risk management

    76  92  39  260  105  317  249  1,138

Loans and advances to banks

  5,882  22,143  446  3,189  1,259  1,035  5,680  486  40,120
Loans and advances to customers  43,469  62,294  12,793  19,307  35,195  30,926  47,297  94,117  345,398
Available for sale financial instruments  994  9,009  4,544  2,377  10,831  6,466  5,268  3,583  43,072

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  

 

 

 158,475

 

 

 7,369

 

 

 7,835

 

 

 4,921

 

 

 4,348

 

 

 127

 

 

 

 

  183,075

 

Total financial assets

 

  499,323  256,400  25,901  35,776  66,348  49,902  69,326  114,734  1,117,710

Other assets

 

                109,651  109,651

Total assets

 

  499,323  256,400  25,901  35,776  66,348  49,902  69,326  224,385  1,227,361

Liabilities

           
Deposits from other banks  16,288  69,049  1,977  991  651  1,171  231  188  90,546
Items in the course of collection due to other banks  1,781  11              1,792

Customer accounts

  174,269  101,667  5,692  4,097  1,656  1,240  993  5,373  294,987
Trading portfolio liabilities  65,402                65,402

Financial liabilities designated at fair value:

           

– held on own account

  655  18,022  8,331  6,933  10,830  11,601  12,625  5,492  74,489

Derivative financial instruments:

           

– held for trading

  247,378                247,378
– designated for risk management    51  43  82  310  150  215  59  910
Debt securities in issue  698  70,760  11,798  6,945  13,308  7,696  3,123  5,900  120,228
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent    160,822  2,906  5,547  40  92  22    169,429

Subordinated liabilities

 

          250  934  7,511  9,455  18,150

Total financial liabilities

 

  506,471  420,382  30,747  24,595  27,045  22,884  24,720  26,467  1,083,311

Other liabilities

 

                111,574  111,574

Total liabilities

 

  506,471  420,382  30,747  24,595  27,045  22,884  24,720  138,041  1,194,885

Cumulative liquidity gap

 

  (7,148) (171,130) (175,976) (164,795) (125,492) (98,474) (53,868) 32,476  32,476

At 31st December 2008

    

On

demand

£m

  

Not more

than three

months

£m

  

Over

three

months

but not

more than

six months

£m

  

Over

six months

but not

more than

one year

£m

  

Over

one year

but not

more than

three years

£m

  

Over

three years

but not

more than

five years

£m

  

Over

five years

but not

more than

ten years

£m

  

Over

ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

Assets

            
Cash and balances at central banks  29,774  245              30,019
Items in the course of collection from other banks  1,619  76              1,695
Trading portfolio assets  185,637                185,637
Financial assets designated at fair value:            

– held on own account

  661  13,861  1,648  5,861  5,420  6,738  4,159  16,194  54,542
Derivative financial instruments:            

– held for trading

  981,996                981,996
– designated for risk management    381  91  542  505  336  419  532  2,806
Loans and advances to banks  4,882  35,690  505  1,892  1,887  1,854  52  945  47,707
Loans and advances to customers  51,155  87,624  12,447  21,976  60,927  44,982  57,409  125,295  461,815
Available for sale financial investments  132  11,539  5,129  13,461  10,266  6,660  9,779  8,010  64,976

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  29

 

  107,415

 

 

 

 8,947

 

 

 

 2,582

 

 

 

 10,124

 

 

 

 1,019

 

 

 

 238

 

 

 

 

 

  130,354

 

Total financial assets

 

  1,255,885  256,831  28,767  46,314  89,129  61,589  72,056  150,976  1,961,547

Other assets

 

                91,433  91,433

Total assets

 

  1,255,885  256,831  28,767  46,314  89,129  61,589  72,056  242,409  2,052,980

Liabilities

            
Deposits from other banks  10,850  94,083  6,040  1,273  1,585  461  433  185  114,910
Items in the course of collection due to other banks  1,633  2              1,635
Customer accounts  195,728  112,582  9,389  10,099  2,451  1,555  1,395  2,306  335,505
Trading portfolio liabilities  59,474                59,474
Financial liabilities designated at fair value:            

– held on own account

  1,043  16,573  10,630  5,115  12,229  12,041  11,825  7,436  76,892
Derivative financial instruments:            

– held for trading

  964,071                964,071
– designated for risk management    222  141  1,345  1,197  108  781  207  4,001
Debt securities in issue  2,567  79,600  10,049  17,197  23,355  9,856  2,528  4,415  149,567
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent  69  176,169  3,409  2,067  245  267  59    182,285

Subordinated liabilities

 

    260  49  281  1,345  999  10,176  16,732  29,842

Total financial liabilities

 

  1,235,435  479,491  39,707  37,377  42,407  25,287  27,197  31,281  1,918,182

Other liabilities

 

                87,387  87,387

Total liabilities

 

  1,235,435  479,491  39,707  37,377  42,407  25,287  27,197  118,668  2,005,569

Cumulative liquidity gap

 

  20,450  (202,210) (213,150) (204,213) (157,491) (121,189) (76,330) 47,411  47,411

 

241270 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

49 Liquidity risk(continued)

 

At 31st December 2007

    

On

demand

£m

  

Not more

than three

months

£m

  

Over

three

months

but not

more than

six months

£m

  

Over

six months

but not

more than

one year

£m

  

Over

one year

but not

more than

three years

£m

  

Over

three years

but not

more than

five years

£m

  

Over

five years

but not

more than

ten years

£m

  

Over

ten years

£m

  

Total

£m

Assets

           
Cash and balances at central banks  4,785  1,016              5,801
Items in course of collection from other banks  1,651  185              1,836
Trading portfolio assets  193,691                193,691
Financial assets designated at fair value:           

– held on own account

  1,901  3,202  657  3,029  13,882  7,022  10,637  16,299  56,629
Derivative financial instruments:           

– held for trading

  246,950                246,950

– designated for risk management

    76  92  39  260  105  317  249  1,138
Loans and advances to banks  5,882  22,143  446  3,189  1,259  1,035  5,680  486  40,120
Loans and advances to customers  43,469  62,294  12,793  19,307  35,195  30,926  47,297  94,117  345,398
Available for sale financial investments  994  9,009  4,544  2,377  10,831  6,466  5,268  3,583  43,072

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  

 

 

 

 158,475

 

 

 

 7,369

 

 

 

 7,835

 

 

 

 4,921

 

 

 

 4,348

 

 

 

 127

 

 

 

 

 

  183,075

 

Total financial assets

 

  499,323  256,400  25,901  35,776  66,348  49,902  69,326  114,734  1,117,710

Other assets

 

                109,651  109,651

Total assets

 

  499,323  256,400  25,901  35,776  66,348  49,902  69,326  224,385  1,227,361

Liabilities

           
Deposits from other banks  16,288  69,049  1,977  991  651  1,171  231  188  90,546
Items in the course of collection due to other banks  1,781  11              1,792
Customer accounts  174,269  101,667  5,692  4,097  1,656  1,240  993  5,373  294,987
Trading portfolio liabilities  65,402                65,402
Financial liabilities designated at fair value:           

– held on own account

  655  18,022  8,331  6,933  10,830  11,601  12,625  5,492  74,489
Derivative financial instruments:           

– held for trading

  247,378                247,378

– designated for risk management

    51  43  82  310  150  215  59  910
Debt securities in issue  698  70,760  11,798  6,945  13,308  7,696  3,123  5,900  120,228
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent    160,822  2,906  5,547  40  92  22    169,429

Subordinated liabilities

 

          250  934  7,511  9,455  18,150

Total financial liabilities

 

  506,471  420,382  30,747  24,595  27,045  22,884  24,720  26,467  1,083,311

Other liabilities

 

                111,574  111,574

Total liabilities

 

  506,471  420,382  30,747  24,595  27,045  22,884  24,720  138,041  1,194,885

Cumulative liquidity gap

 

  (7,148) (171,130) (175,976) (164,795) (125,492) (98,474) (53,868) 32,476  32,476

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

271


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

2008

4849 Liquidity risk (continued)

At 31st December 2006

 

  On
demand
£m
 
 
 
 Not more
than three
months
£m
 
 
 
 
 Over three
months
but not
more

than six
months
£m

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 Over six
months
but not
more

than one
year
£m

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 Over one
year

but not
more
than three
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over three
years

but not
more
than five
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over five
years

but not
more
than ten
years

£m

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 Over

ten

years

£m

  Total

£m

Assets

           

Cash and balances at central banks

  7,050  295              7,345
Items in course of collection from other banks  1,782  626              2,408

Trading portfolio assets

  177,867                177,867

Financial assets designated at fair value:

           

– held on own account

  1,899  1,975  295  942  5,692  5,239  4,018  11,739  31,799

Derivative financial instruments:

           

– held for trading

  137,273                137,273

– designated for risk management

    72  88  37  249  100  296  238  1,080

Loans and advances to banks

  2,887  18,806  800  3,063  1,595  1,130  1,012  1,633  30,926

Loans and advances to customers

  32,492  44,424  9,901  15,508  31,986  27,668  38,036  82,285  282,300

Available for sale financial instruments

  564  9,084  2,516  8,733  13,854  4,621  6,999  5,332  51,703

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 

  

 

 

 149,872

 

 

 4,670

 

 

 11,025

 

 

 1,375

 

 

 6,939

 

 

 168

 

 

 41

 

  174,090

 

Total financial assets

 

  361,814  225,154  18,270  39,308  54,751  45,697  50,529  101,268  896,791

Other assets

 

                99,996  99,996

Total assets

 

  361,814  225,154  18,270  39,308  54,751  45,697  50,529  201,264  996,787
Liabilities           

Deposits from other banks

  19,163  55,534  1,418  891  593  1,406  367  190  79,562
Items in the course of collection due to other banks  2,154  67              2,221

Customer accounts

  153,642  89,079  5,594  3,604  1,655  1,436  807  937  256,754

Trading portfolio liabilities

  71,874                71,874
Financial liabilities designated at fair value:           

– held on own account

  6  13,958  6,297  5,143  7,090  8,447  10,978  2,068  53,987
Derivative financial instruments:           

– held for trading

  139,746                139,746
– designated for risk management    306  13  59  230  284  51  8  951

Debt securities in issue

  17  70,805  8,669  5,311  10,408  3,798  4,017  8,112  111,137
Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent    121,278  6,362  2,659  2,305      4,352  136,956

Subordinated liabilities

 

          236  911  4,623  8,016  13,786

Total financial liabilities

 

  386,602  351,027  28,353  17,667  22,517  16,282  20,843  23,683  866,974

Other liabilities

 

                102,423  102,423

Total liabilities

 

  386,602  351,027  28,353  17,667  22,517  16,282  20,843  126,106  969,397

Cumulative liquidity gap

 

  (24,788) (150,661) (160,744) (139,103) (106,869) (77,454) (47,768) 27,390  27,390

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

242


LOGO

48 Liquidity risk (continued)

Contractual maturity of financial liabilities on an undiscounted basis

The table below presents the cash flows payable by the Group under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities at the balance sheet date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows of all financial liabilities (i.e nominal values), whereas the Group manages the inherent liquidity risk based on discounted expected cash inflows. Derivative financial instruments held for trading and trading portfolio liabilities are included in the on demand column at their fair value.

 

At 31st December 2007

 

  On
demand
£m
  Within
one year
£m
  Over one
year

but less
than five
years

£m

  Over five
years
£m
  Total

£m

Deposits from other banks

  16,288  72,533  2,099  275  91,195

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

  1,781  11      1,792

Customer accounts

  174,269  112,875  3,739  10,280  301,163

Trading portfolio liabilities

  65,402        65,402

Financial liabilities designated at fair value:

          

– held on own account

  655  34,008  25,870  31,868  92,401

Derivative financial instruments:

          

– held for trading

  247,378        247,378

– designated for risk management

    226  479  186  891

Debt securities in issue

  698  91,201  22,926  15,020  129,845

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

    169,725  146  23  169,894

Subordinated liabilities

    463  4,964  17,875  23,302

Other financial liabilities

 

    2,968  1,456    4,424

Total financial liabilities

 

  506,471  484,010  61,679  75,527  1,127,687

Off balance sheet items

          

Loan commitments

  183,784  3,111  4,513  963  192,371

Other commitments

 

  453  200  145  12  810
      

Total off balance sheet items

 

  184,237  3,311  4,658  975  193,181

Total financial liabilities and off balance sheet items

 

  690,708  487,321  66,337  76,502  1,320,868

At 31st December 2008

 

At 31st December 2006

  On
demand
£m
  Within
one
year

£m

  Over one
year

but not
more
than five
years

£m

  Over five
years
£m
  Total

£m

  

On

demand

£m

  

Within

one year

£m

  

Over

one year

but

less than

five years

£m

  

Over

five years

£m

  

Total

£m

Deposits from other banks

  19,163  58,101  2,317  590  80,171  10,850  101,537  2,224  671  115,282

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

  2,154  68      2,222  1,633  2      1,635

Customer accounts

  153,642  99,165  3,593  2,836  259,236  195,728  132,927  5,249  5,807  339,711

Trading portfolio liabilities

  71,874        71,874  59,474        59,474

Financial liabilities designated at fair value:

                    

– held on own account

  6  27,539  13,861  19,827  61,233  1,043  33,860  28,300  30,427  93,630

Derivative financial instruments:

                    

– held for trading

  139,746        139,746  964,071        964,071

– designated for risk management

    378  584  199  1,161    1,809  1,671  1,206  4,686

Debt securities in issue

  17  89,222  13,932  15,668  118,839  2,567  108,955  34,510  11,853  157,885

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

    137,040  366    137,406  69  181,895  547  24  182,535

Subordinated liabilities

    837  7,487  9,411  17,735    1,273  10,166  22,593  34,032

Other financial liabilities

    3,138  1,072    4,210    4,573  1,572    6,145
 

Total financial liabilities

  386,602  415,488  43,212  48,531  893,833  1,235,435  566,831  84,239  72,581  1,959,086

Off balance sheet items

                    

Loan commitments

  192,293  10,939  1,255  624  205,111  222,801  30,502  5,799  917  260,019

Other commitments

  313  370  38  56  777  493  318  340    1,151

Total off balance sheet items

  192,606  11,309  1,293  680  205,888  223,294  30,820  6,139  917  261,170

Total financial liabilities and off balance sheet items

  579,208  426,797  44,505  49,211  1,099,721  1,458,729  597,651  90,378  73,498  2,220,256
At 31st December 2007At 31st December 2007
  

On

demand

£m

  

Within

one year

£m

  

Over

one year

but not

more than

five years

£m

  

Over

five years

£m

  

Total

£m

Deposits from other banks

  16,288  72,533  2,099  275  91,195

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

  1,781  11      1,792

Customer accounts

  174,269  112,875  3,739  10,280  301,163

Trading portfolio liabilities

  65,402        65,402

Financial liabilities designated at fair value:

          

– held on own account

  655  34,008  25,870  31,868  92,401

Derivative financial instruments:

          

– held for trading

  247,378        247,378

– designated for risk management

    226  479  186  891

Debt securities in issue

  698  91,201  22,926  15,020  129,845

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

    169,725  146  23  169,894

Subordinated liabilities

    463  4,964  17,875  23,302

Other financial liabilities

    2,968  1,456    4,424

Total financial liabilities

  506,471  484,010  61,679  75,527  1,127,687

Off balance sheet items

          

Loan commitments

  183,784  3,111  4,513  963  192,371

Other commitments

  453  200  145  12  810

Total off balance sheet items

  184,237  3,311  4,658  975  193,181

Total financial liabilities and off balance sheet items

  690,708  487,321  66,337  76,502  1,320,868

Financial liabilities designated at fair value in respect of linked liabilities under investment contracts have been excluded from this analysis as the Group is not exposed to liquidity risk arising from them. Any request for funds from investors would be met simultaneously from the linked assets.

The balances in the above table will not agree directly to the balances in the consolidated balance sheet as the table incorporates all cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, related to both principal as well as those associated with all future coupon payments.

The principal due under perpetual subordinated liability instruments has been included in the over five years category. Further interest payments have not been included on this amount, which according to their strict contractual terms, could carry on indefinitely.

 

243272 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Notes to the accountsLOGO

For the year ended 31st December 2007

4950 Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, in an arms-lengtharm’s length transaction between knowledgeable willing parties.

Comparison of carrying amounts and fair values

The following table summarises the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities presented on the Group’s balance sheet, and their fair values:values differentiating between financial assets and liabilities subsequently measured at fair value and those subsequently measured at amortised cost:

 

    2007  2006    2008  2007
  Notes  Carrying

amount
£m

  Fair
value
£m
  Carrying

amount
£m

  Fair

value
£m

  Notes  

Carrying

amount

£m

  

Fair

value

£m

  

Carrying

amount

£m

  

Fair

value

£m

Financial assets:

          

Financial assets:

          

Cash and balances at central banks

  a  5,801  5,801  7,345  7,345  a  30,019  30,019  5,801  5,801

Items in the course of collection from other banks

  a  1,836  1,836  2,408  2,408  a  1,695  1,695  1,836  1,836

Trading portfolio assets

                    

– Treasury and other eligible bills

  b  2,094  2,094  2,960  2,960  b  4,544  4,544  2,094  2,094

– Debt securities

  b  152,778  152,778  140,576  140,576  b  148,686  148,686  152,778  152,778

– Equity securities

  b  36,307  36,307  31,548  31,548  b  30,535  30,535  36,307  36,307

– Traded Loans

  b  1,780  1,780  1,843  1,843  b  1,070  1,070  1,780  1,780

– Commodities

  b  732  732  940  940  b  802  802  732  732

Financial assets designated at fair value:

                    

held in respect of linked liabilities under investment contracts

  b  90,851  90,851  82,798  82,798  b  66,657  66,657  90,851  90,851

held under own account:

                    

– Equity securities

  b  5,376  5,376  3,711  3,711  b  6,496  6,496  5,376  5,376

– Loans and advances

  b  23,491  23,491  13,196  13,196  b  30,187  30,187  23,491  23,491

– Debt securities

  b  24,217  24,217  12,100  12,100  b  8,628  8,628  24,217  24,217

– Other financial assets designated at fair value

  b  3,545  3,545  2,793  2,793  b  9,231  9,231  3,545  3,545

Derivative financial instruments

  b  248,088  248,088  138,353  138,353  b  984,802  984,802  248,088  248,088

Loans and advances to banks

  c  40,120  40,106  30,926  30,895  c  47,707  47,594  40,120  40,106

Loans and advances to customers:

          

Loans and advances to customers

          

– Residential mortgage loans

  c  111,955  111,951  94,511  94,511  c  135,077  133,605  106,619  106,615

– Credit card receivables

  c  14,289  14,289  13,399  13,399  c  22,304  22,312  14,289  14,289

– Other personal lending

  c  24,968  24,968  20,511  20,488  c  32,038  31,264  29,857  29,857

– Wholesale and corporate loans and advances

  c  183,109  181,589  143,835  143,621  c  259,699  247,798  183,556  182,036

– Finance lease receivables

  c  11,077  11,066  10,044  10,042  c  12,697  12,697  11,077  11,066

Available for sale financial instruments

                    

– Treasury and other eligible bills

  b  2,723  2,723  2,420  2,420  b  4,003  4,003  2,723  2,723

– Debt securities

  b  38,673  38,673  47,912  47,912  b  58,831  58,831  38,673  38,673

– Equity securities

  b  1,676  1,676  1,371  1,371  b  2,142  2,142  1,676  1,676

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  c  183,075  183,075  174,090  174,090  c  130,354  129,296  183,075  183,075

Financial liabilities:

          

Financial liabilities:

          

Deposits from banks

  d  90,546  90,508  79,562  79,436  d  114,910  114,912  90,546  90,508

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

  a  1,792  1,792  2,221  2,221  a  1,635  1,635  1,792  1,792

Customer accounts:

                    

– Current and demand accounts

  d  80,006  80,006  77,216  77,216  d  82,515  82,515  80,006  80,006

– Savings accounts

  d  74,599  74,599  65,784  65,792  d  76,008  76,008  74,599  74,599

– Other time deposits

  d  140,382  141,917  113,754  113,653  d  176,982  176,966  140,382  141,917

Trading portfolio liabilities:

                    

– Treasury and other eligible bills

  b  486  486  608  608  b  79  79  486  486

– Debt securities

  b  50,506  50,506  58,142  58,142  b  44,309  44,309  50,506  50,506

– Equity securities

  b  13,702  13,702  12,697  12,697  b  14,919  14,919  13,702  13,702

– Commodities

  b  708  708  427  427  b  167  167  708  708

Financial liabilities designated at fair value:

                    

– Held on own account

  b  76,892  76,892  74,489  74,489

– Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  b  92,639  92,639  84,637  84,637  b  69,183  69,183  92,639  92,639

– Held on own account

  b  74,489  74,489  53,987  53,987

Derivative financial instruments

  b  248,288  248,288  140,697  140,697  b  968,072  968,072  248,288  248,288

Debt securities in issue

  e  120,228  120,176  111,137  111,131  d  149,567  148,736  120,228  120,176

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  d  169,429  169,429  136,956  136,956  d  182,285  182,285  169,429  169,429

Subordinated liabilities

  f  18,150  17,410  13,786  13,976  d  29,842  22,944  18,150  17,410

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 244
 273


LOGONotes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

4950 Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

Notes

aFair value approximates carrying value due to the short-term nature of these financial assets and liabilities.

 

bFinancialThe carrying value of financial instruments subsequently measured at fair value (including those held for trading, designated at fair value, derivatives and available for sale) is determined in accordance with accounting policy 7 on page 180 and further description and analysis of these fair values are set out below.

cThe carrying value of financial assets subsequently measured at amortised cost (including loans and advances, and other lending such as reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed) is determined in accordance with the accounting policy 7 on page 180. In many cases the fair value disclosed approximates the carrying value because the instruments are short term in nature or have interest rates that reprice frequently. In other cases, fair value is determined using discounted cash flows, applying either pricedmarket derived interest rates or, where the counterparty is a bank, rates currently offered by other financial institutions for placings with referencesimilar characteristics. Additionally, fair value can be determined by applying an average of available regional and industry segmental credit spreads to athe loan portfolio, taking the contractual maturity of the loan facilities into consideration.

dThe carrying value of financial liabilities subsequently measured at amortised cost (including customer accounts and other deposits such as repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent, debt securities in issue, subordinated liabilities) is determined in accordance with the accounting policy 7 on page 180. In many cases, the fair value disclosed approximates the carrying value because the instruments are short term in nature or have interest rates that reprice frequently such as customer accounts and other deposits and short term debt securities. Fair values of other debt securities in issue are based on quoted market price for that instrumentprices where available, or bywhere these are unavailable, are estimated using a valuation model. WhereFair values for dated and undated convertible and non-convertible loan capital are based on quoted market rates for the issue concerned or similar issues with similar terms and conditions.

Valuation methodology

The table below shows the Group’s financial assets and liabilities that are recognised and measured at fair value analysed by valuation technique. A description of the nature of the techniques used to calculate valuations based on observable inputs and valuations based on unobservable inputs is set out on the next page.

    At 31st December 2008 
   Valuations  Valuations based on unobservable inputs    
    

based on
observable
inputs

£m

  

Vanilla
products

£m

  

Exotic

products

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Total

£m

 

Trading portfolio assets

  174,168  11,469    11,469  185,637 

Financial assets designated at fair value:

      

– held on own account

  37,618  16,559  365  16,924  54,542 
– held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts  66,657        66,657 

Derivative financial assets

  970,028  12,436  2,338  14,774  984,802 

Available for sale assets

  63,149  1,827    1,827  64,976 

Total assets

  1,311,620  42,291  2,703  44,994  1,356,614 

Trading portfolio liabilities

  (59,436) (38)   (38) (59,474)

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  (71,044) (290) (5,558) (5,848) (76,892)

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (69,183)       (69,183)

Derivative financial liabilities

  (959,518) (6,151) (2,403) (8,554) (968,072)

Total liabilities

  (1,159,181) (6,479) (7,961) (14,440) (1,173,621)
    At 31st December 2007 
   Valuations  Valuations based on unobservable inputs    
    

based on
observable
inputs

£m

  

Vanilla

products

£m

  

Exotic products

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Total

£m

 

Trading portfolio assets

  189,234  4,457    4,457  193,691 

Financial assets designated at fair value:

      

– held on own account

  39,810  16,819    16,819  56,629 
– held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts  90,851        90,851 

Derivative financial assets

  245,381  1,118  1,589  2,707  248,088 

Available for sale assets

  42,262  810    810  43,072 

Total assets

  607,538  23,204  1,589  24,793  632,331 

Trading portfolio liabilities

  (65,360) (42)   (42) (65,402)

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  (68,317) (951) (5,221) (6,172) (74,489)

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (92,639)       (92,639)

Derivative financial liabilities

  (243,906) (1,178) (3,204) (4,382) (248,288)

Total liabilities

  (470,222) (2,171) (8,425) (10,596) (480,818)

Of the total Group assets of £1,356,614m measured at fair value, £44,994m (2007: £24,793m) were valued using models with unobservable inputs. While the derivative assets associated with our Monoline exposure accounted for a significant portion of the increase in assets valued using unobservable inputs, further increases arose due to weakness in Sterling, as well as increased illiquidity in the market.

274

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

50 Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

The nature of the valuation techniques set out in the table above are summarised as follows:

Valuations based on observable inputs

Valuations based on observable inputs include

Financial instruments for which their valuations are determined by reference to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets where the quoted price is readily available and the price represents actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis;

Financial instruments valued using recent arm’s length market transactions or with reference to the current fair value is calculated using a valuation model, the methodology is to calculate the expected cash flows under the terms of each specific contract and then discount these values back to a present value.similar instruments;

The expected

Linear financial instruments such as swaps and forwards which are valued using market standard pricing techniques;

Options that are commonly traded in markets whereby all the inputs to the market-standard pricing models are deemed observable.

Valuations based on unobservable inputs

Valuations based on unobservable inputs include:

(a) Vanilla products

Products valued using simple models, such as discounted cash flowsflow or Black Scholes models, where some of the inputs are not observable. This would include, for each contractexample, commercial loans, commercial mortgage backed securities, selected mortgage products, Alt As and subprime loans, as well as long-dated vanilla options with tenors different to those commonly traded in the markets and hence unobservable volatilities.

(b) Exotic products

Exotic products are determined either directly by referenceover-the-counter products that are relatively bespoke, not commonly traded in the markets, and are valued using sophisticated mathematical models where some of the inputs are not observable.

In determining the value of vanilla and exotic products the following are the principal inputs that can require judgement:

(i) Volatility

Volatility is a critical input to actual cash flows implicitall option pricing models, across all asset classes. In most cases volatility is observable from the vanilla options that are traded across the various asset classes but, on occasion, volatility is unobservable, for example, for long maturity option.

(ii) Correlation

Across asset classes, correlation is another important input to some pricing models, for example for products whose value depends on two equity indices. In some developed markets there are products traded from which correlation can be implied, for example spread products in observable market prices or through modelling cash flows using appropriate financial-markets pricing models. Wherever possible thesecommodities.

(iii) Model input parameters

Some exotic models use as their basis observable market prices and rates including,have input parameters that define the models, for example interest rate models tend to have parameters that are needed to capture the rich dynamics of the yield curve. These model parameters are typically not directly observable but may be inferred from observable inputs.

(iv) Spreads to discount rates

For certain product types, particularly credit related such as asset backed financial instruments, the discount rate is set at a spread to the standard discount (LIBOR) rates. In these cases, in addition to standard discount rates, the spread is a significant input to the valuation. For some assets this spread data can be unobservable.

(v) Default rates and recovery rates

In certain credit products valued using pricing models, default rates and recovery rates may be necessary inputs. Some default rates and recovery rates are deemed observable but for others which are less frequently traded in the markets they may not be.

(vi) Prepayment rates

For products in the securitisation businesses, for example mortgage backed securities, prepayment rates are key inputs. Some of the drivers of prepayment are understood (such as the nature of assets/loans, e.g. quality of mortgage pool and macroeconomic factors) however, future prepayment rates are considered unobservable.

The following summary sets out the principal instruments whose valuation may involve judgmental inputs.

Corporate bonds

Corporate bonds are generally valued using observable quoted prices or recently executed transactions. Where observable price quotations are not available, the fair value is determined based on cash flow models where significant inputs may include yield curves, equities and commodities prices, option volatilities and currency rates. The process of calculating fair value on illiquid instrumentsbond or from a valuation model may require estimation of certain pricing parameters, assumptions or model characteristics. These estimates are calibrated against industry standards, economic models and observed transaction prices. Changes to assumptions or estimated levels can potentially impactsingle name credit default swap spreads.

Mortgage whole loans

Wherever possible, the fair value of mortgage whole loans is determined using observable quoted prices or recently executed transactions for comparable assets. Where observable price quotations or benchmark proxies are not available, fair value is determined using cash flow models where significant inputs include yield curves, collateral specific loss assumptions, asset specific prepayment assumptions, yield spreads and expected default rates.

Commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities

Commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities (ABS) (residential mortgages, credit cards, auto loans, student loans and leases) are valued using observable information to the greatest extent possible. Wherever possible, the fair value is determined using quoted prices or recently executed transactions. Where observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models where the significant inputs may include yield curves, credit spreads and prepayment rates. Securities that are backed by the residual cash flows of an instrumentasset portfolio are generally valued using similar cash flow models. The fair value of home equity loan bonds are determined using models which use scenario analysis with significant inputs including age, rating, internal grade, and index prices.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

275


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

50 Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

Collateralised debt obligations

The valuation of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) notes is first based on an assessment of the probability of an event of default occurring due to a credit deterioration. This is determined by reference to the probability of event of default occurring and the probability of exercise of contractual rights related to event of default. The notes are then valued by determining appropriate valuation multiples to be applied to the contractual cash flows. These are based on inputs including the prospective cash flow performance of the underlying securities, the structural features of the transaction and the net asset value of the underlying portfolio.

Private equity

The fair value of private equity is determined using appropriate valuation methodologies which, dependent on the nature of the investment, may include discounted cash flow analysis, enterprise value comparisons with similar companies, price:earnings comparisons and turnover multiples. For each investment the relevant methodology is applied consistently over time.

OTC Derivatives

Derivative contracts can be exchange traded or over the counter (OTC). OTC derivative contracts include forward, swap and option contracts related to interest rates, bonds, foreign currencies, credit standing of reference entities, equity prices, fund levels, commodity prices or indices on these assets.

The fair value of OTC derivative contracts are modelled using a series of techniques, including closed form analytical formulae (such as reported. the Black-Scholes option pricing model) and simulation based models. The choice of model is dependant on factors such as; the complexity of the product, inherent risks and hedging strategy: statistical behaviour of the underlying, and ability of the model to price consistently with observed market transactions. For many pricing models there is no material subjectivity because the methodologies employed do not necessitate significant judgement and the pricing inputs are observed from actively quoted markets, as is the case for generic interest rate swaps and option markets. In the case of more established derivative products, the pricing models used are widely accepted and used by the other market participants. Significant inputs used in these models may include yield curves, credit spreads, default rates, recovery rates, dividend rates, volatility of underlying interest rates, equity prices or foreign exchange rates and, in some cases, correlation between these inputs. These inputs are determined with reference to quoted prices, recently executed trades, independent market quotes and consensus data.

New, long dated or complex derivative products may require a greater degree of judgement in the implementation of appropriate valuation techniques, due to the complexity of the valuation assumptions and the reduced observability of inputs. The valuation of more complex products may use more generic derivatives as a component to calculating the overall value.

Derivatives where valuation involves a significant degree of judgement include:

Fund derivatives

Fund derivatives are derivatives whose underlyings include mutual funds, hedge funds, indices and multi-asset portfolios. They are valued using underlying fund prices, yield curves and available market information on the level of the hedging risk. Some fund derivatives are valued using unobservable information, generally where the level of the hedging risk is not observable in the market. These are valued taking account of risk of the underlying fund or collection of funds, diversification of the fund by asset, concentration by geographic sector, strategy of the fund, size of the transaction and concentration of specific fund managers.

Commodity derivatives

Commodity derivatives are valued using models where the significant inputs may include interest rate yield curves, commodity price curves, volatility of the underlying commodities and, in some cases, correlation between these inputs, which are generally observable. This approach is applied to base metal, precious metal, energy, power, gas, emissions, soft commodities and freight positions. Due to the significant time span in the various market closes, curves are constructed using differentials to a benchmark curve to ensure that all curves are valued using the dominant market base price.

Structured credit derivatives

Collateralised synthetic obligations (CSOs) are structured credit derivatives which reference the loss profile of a portfolio of loans, debts or synthetic underlyings. The reference asset can be a corporate credit or an asset backed credit. For CSOs that reference corporate credits an analytical model is used. For CSOs on asset backed underlyings, due to the path dependent nature of a CSO on an amortising portfolio a Monte Carlo simulation is used rather than analytic approximation. The expected loss probability for each reference credit in the portfolio is derived from the single name credit default swap spread curve and in addition, for ABS references, a prepayment rate assumption. A simulation is then used to compute survival time which allows us to calculate the marginal loss over each payment period by reference to estimated recovery rates. Significant inputs include prepayment rates, cumulative default rates, and recovery rates.

Sensitivity analysis of valuations using unobservable inputs

As part of our risk management processes, stress tests are applied on the significant unobservable parameters to generate a range of potentially possible alternative valuations. The financial instruments that most impact this sensitivity analysis are those with the more illiquid and/or structured portfolios. The stresses are applied independently and do not take account of any cross correlation between separate asset classes that would reduce the overall effect on the valuations.

At 31st December 2008

  Significant
unobservable
parametersa
  

Potential effect recorded 

in profit or loss         

Favourable (Unfavourable)

  

Potential effect recorded 

in equity              

Favourable (Unfavourable)

 
      £m  £m  £m  £m 
Asset backed securities and loans and derivatives with asset backed underlyings  iii, iv, v, vi  1,470  (1,896) 46  (54)

Private equity b

  iii, iv  209  (208) 64  (142)
Derivative assets and liabilities and financial liabilities designated at fair value:         

– Derivative exposure to Monoline insurers

  iii, iv, v, vi  21  (329)    

– Funds derivatives and structured notes

  iii  226  (123)    

– Other structured derivatives and notes

  i, ii, iii  304  (196)    

Other

  i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi  55  (43)    

Total

     2,285  (2,795) 110  (196)

Notes

a(i )-(vi) refer to valuation inputs listed on page 275.
bAvailable for sale assets (Private Equity) and assets designated at fair value (Principal Investments).

276

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

50 Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

At 31st December 2007  Significant
unobservable
parametersa
  

Potential effect recorded 

in profit or loss         

Favourable (Unfavourable)

  

Potential effect recorded 

in equity              

Favourable (Unfavourable)

 
      £m  £m  £m  £m 
Asset backed securities and loans and derivatives with asset backed underlyings  iii, iv, v, vi  868  (868) 5  (5)

Private equity

  iii, iv  75  (75) 36  (36)
Derivative assets and liabilities and financial liabilities designated at fair value:         

– Fund derivatives and structured notes

  iii  441  (147)    

– Other structured derivatives and notes

  i, ii, iii  57  (56)    

Other

  i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi  3  (1)    

Total

     1,444  (1,147) 41  (41)

The effect of changing thesestressing the significant unobservable assumptions for those financial instruments for which the fair values were measured using valuation techniques that are determined in full or in part on assumptions that are not supported by observable market prices, to a range of reasonably possible alternative assumptions,alternatives would be to increase the fair valuevalues by up to £1.5bn (2006: £0.1bn)£2.4bn (2007: £1.5bn) or to decrease the fair valuevalues by up to £1.2bn (2006: £0.1bn)£3.0bn (2007: £1.2bn) with substantially all the potential effect being recorded in profit or loss rather than equity.

Asset backed securities and loans, and derivatives with asset backed underlyings

Asset backed securities, loans and related derivatives contribute most to the sensitivity analysis as at 31st December 2008. The stress effect increased in this area in 2008 due to continued market dislocation and increased levels of unobservability. The stresses having the most significant impact on the analysis are: for commercial mortgage backed securities and loans, changing the spreads to discount rates to close to originated levels (favourable stress) and increasing spreads to between 2 and 6% (unfavourable stress); for residential mortgage backed securities and loans, changing the spreads to discount rates by +/-10%; and for collateralised debt obligations that reference asset backed securities and loans, primarily by changing the spreads to discount rates by +/-20%.

These variations inPrivate equity

The sensitivity amounts are calculated by stressing the assumptions have been estimatedkey valuation inputs to each individual valuation – generally either price:earnings ratios or EBITDA analysis. The stresses are then determined by comparing these metrics with a range of similar companies.

Derivative exposure to Monoline insurers

The favourable stress is calculated by reference to counterparty quotes for second loss protection on the appropriate reference obligations. The unfavourable stress is calculated by applying a product by product basisdefault scenario to the monolines that are rated BBB or below.

Fund derivatives and form part of the Bank’s internal control processes over the determination of fair value.structured notes

The valuation of these transactions takes into account the risk that the underlying fund-linked asset value will decrease too quickly to be able to re-hedge with risk-free instruments (‘gap risk’). The sensitivity amounts are determined by applying stresses to market quotes for hedging the relevant gap risk. The unfavourable stress is based on a shift in the gap risk price of 34bp, the favourable stress applies to a pricing level that assumes no gap event will occur.

Other structured derivatives and notes

The sensitivity amounts are calculated principally by adjusting the relevant correlation sensitivity used in the valuation model used forby a particular instrument,range based on structured derivative data available in consensuses pricing services. The range applied to correlation sensitivity is an adverse or beneficial move of 15bp applied to the quality and liquiditycorrelation sensitivity.

Unrecognised gains as a result of market data used for pricing, other fair value adjustments not specifically captured by the model, market data and assumptions or estimates in these are all subject to internal review and approval procedures and consistent application between accounting periods.use of valuation models using unobservable inputs

The amount that has yet to be recognised in income that relates to the difference between the transaction price (the fair value at initial recognition) and the amount that would have arisen had valuation models using unobservable inputs been used on initial recognition, less amounts subsequently recognised, was as follows:

 

At 31st December

  2007
£m
 
 
  2006
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

At 1st January

  534   260   154  534 

New transactions

  134   359   77  134 

Amounts recognised in profit or loss during the year

  (514)  (85)  (103) (514)

At 31st December

  154   534   128  154 

The net asset fair value position of the related financial instruments increased by £2,842m£16,357m for the year ended 31st December 20072008 (31st December 2006: £2,814m)2007: £2,842m). In many cases these changes in fair values were offset by changes in fair values of other financial instruments, which were priced in active markets or valued by using a valuation technique which is supported by observable market prices or rates, or by transactions which have been realised.

Notes

 

caThe fair value for loans and advances, and other lending (including reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral(i )-(vi) refer to valuation inputs listed on securities borrowed) is calculated using discounted cash flows, applying either market rates where practicable or, where the counterparty is a bank, rates currently offered by other financial institutions for placings with similar characteristics. In many cases the fair value approximates carrying value because the instruments are short term in nature or have interest rates that reprice frequently.page 289.

 

dThe fair value of customer accounts other deposits and other borrowings (including repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent) is estimated using market rates at the balance sheet date. The fair value of these instruments approximate to carrying amount in most cases because, in general, they are short term in nature and reprice frequently.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

277


Notes to the accounts

eFair values of short-term debt securities in issue are approximately equal to their carrying amount. Fair values of other debt securities in issue are based on quoted prices where available, or where these are unavailable, are estimated using other valuation techniques.

For the year ended 31st December 2008

fThe calculated fair values for dated and undated convertible and non-convertible loan capital were based upon quoted market rates

51 Reclassification of financial assets held for trading

On 16th December the issue concerned or equivalent issues with similar terms and conditions.

The Group considersreclassified certain financial assets originally classified as held for trading that givenwere no longer held for the lackpurpose of an established market,selling or repurchasing in the diversitynear term out of fee structuresfair value through profit or loss to loans and receivables. In making this reclassification, the difficultyGroup identified those trading assets, comprising portfolios of separatingbank-issued fixed rate notes and mortgage and other asset backed securities, for which it had a clear change of intent to hold for the valueforeseeable future or until maturity rather than to trade in the short term. At the time of the instruments fromtransfer, the valueGroup identified rare circumstances permitting such reclassification, being severe illiquidity in the relevant market.

The following table shows carrying values and fair values of the overall transaction, it isassets reclassified at 16th December 2008.

    16th December 2008  31st December 2008
    

Carrying

value

£m

  

Carrying
value

£m

  Fair
value
£m

Trading assets reclassified to loans and receivables

  4,046  3,986  3,984

Total financial assets reclassified to loans and receivables

  4,046  3,986  3,984

As at the date of reclassification, the effective interest rates on reclassified trading assets ranged from 0.18% to 9.29% with expected recoverable cash flows of £7.4bn.

If the reclassifications had not meaningful to provide an estimate ofbeen made, the Group’s income statement for 2008 would have included unrealised fair value losses on the reclassified trading assets of £1.5m.

After reclassification, the reclassified financial commitments and contingent liabilities.assets contributed the following amounts to the 2008 income before income taxes.

 

245  

Barclays2008
£m

Annual Report 2007

Net interest income

4

Provision for credit losses

Income before income taxes on reclassified trading assets

4


NotesPrior to reclassification in 2008, £144m of unrealised fair value losses on the accountsreclassified trading assets was recognised in the consolidated income statement for 2008 (2007: £218m loss).

For the year ended 31st December 2007

5052 Capital Management

Barclays operates a centralised capital management model, considering both regulatory and economic capital. The capital management strategy is to continue to maximise shareholder value through optimising both the level and mix of capital resources. Decisions on the allocation of capital resources are conducted as part of the strategic planning review.

The Group’s capital management objectives are to:

 

SupportMaintain sufficient capital resources to meet the Group’s AA credit rating.minimum regulatory capital requirements set by the FSA and the US Federal Reserve Bank’s requirements that a financial holding company be well capitalised.

 

Maintain sufficient capital resources to support the Group’s risk appetite and economic capital requirements.

 

Maintain sufficient capital resources to meetSupport the FSA’s minimum regulatory capital requirements and the US Federal Reserve Bank’s requirements that a financial holding company be well capitalised.Group’s credit rating.

 

Ensure locally regulated subsidiaries can meet their minimum capital requirements.

Allocate capital to businesses to support the Group’s strategic objectives, including optimising returns on economic and regulatory capital.

External Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Group is subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), following guidelines developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee) and implemented in the UK via European Union Directives.

Minimum requirements under FSA’s Basel rules are expressed as a ratio of capital resources to risk weighted assets (Risk Asset Ratio). Risk weighted assets are a function of risk weights applied to the Group’s assets using calculations developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

Under Basel II, effective from 1st January 2008, the Group has been granted approval by the FSA to adoptuse the advanced approaches to credit and operational risk management. Pillar 1 risk weighted assets will becapital requirements are generated using the Group’s risk models. Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements under Basel II are Pillar 1 risk weighted assets multiplied by 8%, the internationally agreed minimum ratio.

Under Pillar 2 of Basel II, the Group is subject to an overall regulatory capital requirement based on individual capital guidance (‘ICG’) received from the FSA. The ICG imposes additional capital requirements in excess of Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements. Barclays received its ICG from the FSA in December 2007.

Outside the UK, the Group has operations (and main regulators) located in continental Europe, in particular France, Germany, Spain, Portugal and Italy (local central banks and other regulatory authorities); Asia Pacific (various regulatory authorities including the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Japanese FSA and the Monetary Authority of Singapore); Africa, where the Group’s operations are headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa (The South African Reserve Bank and the Financial Services Board (FSB)) and the United States of America (the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission).

The Group manages its capital resources to ensure that those Group entities that are subject to local capital adequacy regulation in individual countries meet their minimum capital requirements. Local management manages compliance with subsidiary entity minimum regulatory capital requirements with reporting to local Asset and Liability Committees and to Treasury Committee, as required.

278

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

52 Capital Management(continued)

Regulatory Capital Ratios

The table below provides details under Basel I of the Group’sregulatory capital ratios and risk weighted assets at 31st December 2007 and 2006.resources managed by the Group.

 

   2007

%

  2006

%

Capital Ratios

    

Tier 1 ratio

  7.8  7.7

Risk asset ratio

  12.1  11.7
   £m  £m

Total risk weighted assets

  353,476  297,833

 

The table below provides details of the regulatory capital resources managed by the Group.

 

   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 

Total qualifying Tier 1 capital

  27,408  23,005 

Total qualifying Tier 2 capital

  17,123  14,036 

Total deductions

  (1,889) (2,330)

Total net capital resources

  42,642  34,711 
    Basel ll
2008
£m
  Basel I
2007
£m
 

Total qualifying Tier 1 capital

  37,250  27,408 

Total qualifying Tier 2 capital

  22,333  17,123 

Total deductions

  (856) (1,889)

Total net capital resources

  58,727  42,642 

Insurance businesses

Insurance businesses are subject to separate regulation regarding Capital management and have constraints on the transfer of capital. Capital resource requirements are assessed at company level in accordance with local laws and regulations. However, the requirement is that each life fund should be able to meet its own liabilities. In the event that this should not be the case, shareholders’ equity would be required to meet its liabilities to the extent that they could not otherwise be met.

The capital resource requirement of the insurance businesses at 31st December 20072008 was £216m£192m (31st December 2006: £225m)2007: £216m).

53 Segmental reporting

The following section analyses the Group’s performance by business. For management and reporting purposes, Barclays is organised into the following business groupings:

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

UK Retail Banking

Barclays Commercial Bank

Barclaycard

GRCB – Western Europe

GRCB – Emerging Markets

GRCB – Absa

Investment Banking and Investment Management

Barclays Capital

Barclays Global Investors

Barclays Wealth

Head Office Functions and Other Operations

UK Retail Banking

UK Retail Banking comprises Personal Customers, Home Finance, Local Business, Consumer Lending and Barclays Financial Planning. This cluster of businesses aims to build broader and deeper relationships with its Personal and Local Business customers through providing a wide range of products and financial services. Personal Customers and Home Finance provide access to current account and savings products, Woolwich branded mortgages and general insurance. Consumer Lending provides unsecured loan and protection products and Barclays Financial Planning provides investment advice and products. Local Business provides banking services, including money transmission, to small businesses.

Barclays Commercial Bank

Barclays Commercial Bank provides banking services to organisations with an annual turnover of more than £1m. Customers are served via a network of relationship and industry sector specialists, which provides solutions constructed from a comprehensive suite of banking products, support, expertise and services, including specialist asset financing and leasing facilities. Customers are also offered access to the products and expertise of other businesses in the Group, particularly Barclays Capital, Barclaycard and Barclays Wealth.

Barclaycard

Barclaycard is a multi-brand credit card and consumer lending business which also processes card payments for retailers and merchants and issues credit and charge cards to corporate customers and the UK Government. It is one of Europe’s leading credit card businesses and has an increasing presence in the United States and South Africa.

In the UK, Barclaycard comprises Barclaycard UK Cards, Barclaycard Partnerships, Barclays Partner Finance and FirstPlus.

Outside the UK, Barclaycard provides credit cards in the United States, Germany, South Africa (through management of the Absa credit card portfolio) and in the Scandinavian region, where Barclaycard operates through Entercard, a joint venture with Swedbank.

Barclaycard works closely with other parts of the Group, including UK Retail Banking, Barclays Commercial Bank and GRCB – Western Europe and GRCB – Emerging Markets, to leverage their distribution capabilities.

Global Retail and Commercial Banking – Western Europe

GRCB – Western Europe encompasses Barclays Global Retail and Commercial Banking as well as Barclaycard operations in Spain, Italy, Portugal and France. GRCB – Western Europe serves customers through a variety of distribution channels. GRCB – Western Europe provides a variety of products including retail mortgages, current and deposit accounts, commercial lending, unsecured lending, credit cards, investments, and insurance serving the needs of Barclays retail, mass affluent, and corporate customers.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

279


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

53 Segmental reporting(continued)

Global Retail and Commercial Banking – Emerging Markets

GRCB – Emerging Markets encompasses Barclays Global Retail and Commercial Banking, as well as Barclaycard operations, in 14 countries organised in six geographic areas: India and Indian Ocean (India, Mauritius and Seychelles); Middle East and North Africa (UAE and Egypt); East and West Africa (Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya); Southern Africa (Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe); Russia; and Pakistan (from 23rd July 2008). GRCB – Emerging Markets serves its customers through a variety of distribution channels. GRCB – Emerging Markets provides a variety of traditional retail and commercial products including retail mortgages, current and deposit accounts, commercial lending, unsecured lending, credit cards, treasury and investments. In addition to this, it provides specialist services such as Sharia compliant products and mobile banking.

Global Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa

GRCB – Absa represents Barclays consolidation of Absa, excluding Absa Capital and Absa Card which is included as part of Barclays Capital and Barclaycard respectively. Absa Group Limited is a South African financial services organisation serving personal, commercial and corporate customers predominantly in South Africa. GRCB – Absa serves retail customers through a variety of distribution channels and offers a full range of banking services, including current and deposit accounts, mortgages, instalment finance, credit cards, bancassurance products and wealth management services. It also offers customised business solutions for commercial and large corporate customers.

Barclays Capital

Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays that provides large corporate, institutional and government clients with solutions to their financing and risk management needs.

Barclays Capital services a wide variety of client needs, covering strategic advisory and M&A; equity and fixed income capital raising and corporate lending; and risk management across foreign exchange, interest rates, equities and commodities.

Activities are organised into three principal areas: Global Markets, which includes commodities, credit products, equities, foreign exchange, interest rate products; Investment Banking, which includes corporate advisory, Mergers and Acquisitions, equity and fixed-income capital raising and corporate lending; and Private Equity and Principal Investments. Barclays Capital includes Absa Capital, the investment banking business of Absa. Barclays Capital works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities.

Barclays Global Investors

BGI is an asset manager and a provider of investment management products and services.

BGI offers structured investment strategies such as indexing, global asset allocation and risk controlled active products including hedge funds and provides related investment services such as securities lending, cash management and portfolio transition services. BGI collaborates with the other Barclays businesses, particularly Barclays Capital and Barclays Wealth, to develop and market products and leverage capabilities to better serve the client base.

Barclays Wealth

Barclays Wealth serves high net worth, affluent and intermediary clients worldwide, providing private banking, asset management, stockbroking, offshore banking, wealth structuring and financial planning services and managed the closed life assurance activities of Barclays and Woolwich in the UK.

Barclays Wealth works closely with all other parts of the Group to leverage synergies from client relationships and product capabilities.

Head Office Functions and Other Operations

Head Office Functions and Other Operations comprises head office and central support functions, businesses in transition and inter-segment adjustments.

Head office and central support functions comprises the following areas: Executive Management, Finance, Treasury, Corporate Affairs, Human Resources, Strategy and Planning, Internal Audit, Legal, Corporate Secretariat, Property, Tax, Compliance and Risk. Costs incurred wholly on behalf of the businesses are recharged to them.

Businesses in transition principally relate to certain lending portfolios that are centrally managed with the objective of maximising recovery from the assets.

280

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

53 Segmental reporting(continued)

As at 31st December 2008

 UK
Retail
Banking
£m
 
 
 
 
 Barclays
Commercial
Bank

£m

 
 
 

 

 Barclaycard
£m
 
 
 GRCB –
Western
Europe
£m
 
 
 
 
 GRCB –
Emerging
Markets
£m
 
 
 
 
 GRCB–
Absa
£m
 
 
 
 Barclays
Capital
£m
 
 
 
 Barclays
Global
Investors
£m
 
 
 
 
 Barclays
Wealth
£m
 
 
 
 Head office
functions
and other
operations
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Total

£m

 

 

Interest income from external customers 2,816  1,589  1,677  808  644  1,223  2,026  (52) 496  242  11,469 
Other income from external customers 1,702  1,068  1,492  625  375  946  2,989  1,890  914  (355) 11,646 
Income from external customers, net of insurance claims 4,518  2,657  3,169  1,433  1,019  2,169  5,015  1,838  1,410  (113) 23,115 

Inter-segment income

 (36) 88  50  (3)   29  216  6  (86) (264)  
Total income net of insurance claims 4,482  2,745  3,219  1,430  1,019  2,198  5,231  1,844  1,324  (377) 23,115 
Impairment charges and other credit provisions (602) (414) (1,097) (296) (166) (347) (2,423)   (44) (30) (5,419)
Segment expenses – external (2,138) (934) (1,405) (1,108) (856) (1,576) (3,789) (1,231) (809) (520) (14,366)

Inter-segment expenses

 (381) (129) (17) 179  137  271  15  (18) (126) 69   

Total expenses

 (2,519) (1,063) (1,422) (929) (719) (1,305) (3,774) (1,249) (935) (451) (14,366)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures 8  (2) (3)     5  6        14 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures           1      326    327 

Gains on acquisitions

     92  52      2,262        2,406 
Business segment profit before tax 1,369  1,266  789  257  134  552  1,302  595  671  (858) 6,077 

Additional information

           
Depreciation and amortisation 111  69  114  69  58  117  272  40  40  31  921 
Impairment loss – intangible assets                 (3)   (3)

Impairment of goodwill

     37        74        111 
Investments in associates and joint ventures 1  (3) (13)     84  150      122  341 

Total assets

 101,384  84,029  30,925  64,732  14,653  40,391  1,629,117  71,340  13,263  3,146  2,052,980 

Total liabilities

 104,640  64,997  3,004  37,250  10,517  20,720  1,603,093  68,372  45,846  47,130  2,005,569 

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

281


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

53 Segmental reporting(continued)

As at 31st December 2007

 UK

Retail

Banking
£m

 

 

 
 

 Barclays

Commercial

Bank

£m

 

 

 

 

 Barclaycard
£m
 
 
 GRCB –
Western
Europe
£m
 
 
 
 
 GRCB –

Emerging

Markets
£m

 

 

 
 

 GRCB –

Absa
£m

 

 
 

 Barclays
Capital
£m
 
 
 
 Barclays

Global

Investors
£m

 

 

 
 

 Barclays
Wealth
£m
 
 
 
 Head office
functions
and other
operations
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Total

£m

 

 

Net interest income from external customers 2,725  1,624  1,303  472  344  1,140  1,536  (2) 453  15  9,610 
Other income from external customers 1,652  922  1,086  474  189  832  5,398  1,917  890  30  13,390 
Income from external customers, net of insurance claims 4,377  2,546  2,389  946  533  1,972  6,934  1,915  1,343  45  23,000 
Inter-segment income (80) 18  141  (9)   27  185  11  (56) (237)  
Total income net of insurance claims 4,297  2,564  2,530  937  533  1,999  7,119  1,926  1,287  (192) 23,000 
Impairment charges and other credit provisions (559) (292) (827) (76) (39) (146) (846)   (7) (3) (2,795)

Segment expenses – external

 (2 ,154) (785) (1,079) (859) (553) (1,518) (3,989) (1,180) (829) (253) (13,199)

Inter-segment expenses

 (316) (144) (14) 186  158  251  16  (12) (144) 19   

Total expenses

 (2 ,470) (929) (1,093) (673) (395) (1,267) (3,973) (1,192) (973) (234) (13,199)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures 7    (7)   1  6  35        42 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures   14    8    5        1  28 
Business segment profit before tax 1,275  1,357  603  196  100  597  2,335  734  307  (428) 7,076 

Additional information

           

Depreciation and amortisation

 101  33  79  42  30  121  181  22  18  26  653 
Impairment loss – intangible assets   13        1          14 
Investments in associates and joint ventures (7) 1  (8)     108  171      112  377 

Total assets

 88,477  74,566  22,121  43,702  9,188  36,368  839,850  89,218  18,188  5,683  1,227,361 

Total liabilities

 101,516  66,251  1,952  24,004  7,507  17,176  811,704  87,096  44,152  33,527  1,194,885 

As at 31st December 2006

 UK

Retail

Banking
£m

 

 

 
 

 Barclays

Commercial

Bank

£m

 

 

 

 

 Barclaycard
£m
 
 
 GRCB –
Western
Europe
£m
 
 
 
 
 GRCB –

Emerging

Markets
£m

 

 

 
 

 GRCB –

Absa
£m

 

 
 

 Barclays
Capital
£m
 
 
 
 Barclays

Global

Investors
£m

 

 

 
 

 Barclays
Wealth
£m
 
 
 
 Head office
functions
and other
operations
£m
 
 
 
 
 
 Total
£m
 
 
Net interest income from external customers 2,649  1,618  1,294  389  274  1,030  1,460  17  404  8  9,143 
Other income from external customers 1,673  771  1,226  364  122  967  4,746  1,653  795  135  12,452 
Income from external customers, net of insurance claims 4,322  2,389  2,520  753  396  1,997  6,206  1,670  1,199  143  21,595 

Inter-segment income

 24  15  56  (2)   34  61  (5) (39) (144)  
Total income net of insurance claims 4,346  2,404  2,576  751  396  2,031  6,267  1,665  1,160  (1) 21,595 
Impairment charges and other credit provisions (635) (253) (1,053) (38) (30) (112) (42)   (2) 11  (2,154)

Segment expenses – external

 (2 ,263) (696) (861) (693) (461) (1,529) (3,988) (940) (772) (471) (12,674)

Inter-segment expenses

 (269) (172) (132) 143  191  210  (21) (11) (141) 202   

Total expenses

 (2 ,532) (868) (993) (550) (270) (1,319) (4,009) (951) (913) (269) (12,674)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures 2  3  (8) (1) 41  9          46 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures   76      247            323 
Business segment profit before tax 1,181  1,362  522  162  384  609  2,216  714  245  (259) 7,136 

Additional information

           

Depreciation and amortisation

 100  23  69  44  28  141  132  13  10  31  591 
Impairment loss – intangible assets       1  1  5          7 
Investments in associates and joint ventures (6) 9  7  (1)   51  71      97  228 

Total assets

 81,693  66,224  20,033  33,487  5,219  29,575  657,922  80,515  15,023  7,096  996,787 

Total liabilities

 94,694  62,335  2,062  17,545  5,207  13,974  632,208  79,366  37,652  24,354  969,397 

282

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

53 Segmental reporting(continued)

Revenue by products and services

An analysis of revenue from external customers by product or service is presented below:

As at 31st December

  2008

£m

 

 

 2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

 

Net interest income

    

Cash and balances with central banks

  174  145  91 

Available for sale investments

  2,355  2,580  2,811 

Loans and advances to banks

  1,267  1,416  903 

Loans and advances to customers

  23,754  19,559  16,290 

Other

  460  1,608  1,710 

Interest income

  28,010  25,308  21,805 

Deposits from banks

  (2,189) (2,720) (2,819)

Customer accounts

  (6,697) (4,110) (3,076)

Debt securities in issue

  (5,910) (6,651) (5,282)

Subordinated liabilities

  (1,349) (878) (777)

Other

  (396) (1,339) (708)

Interest expense

  (16,541) (15,698) (12,662)

Net interest income

  11,469  9,610  9,143 

Net fee and commission income

    

Brokerage fees

  87  109  70 

Investment management fees

  1,616  1,787  1,535 

Securities lending

  389  241  185 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  7,208  6,363  6,031 

Foreign exchange commissions

  189  178  184 

Fee and commission income

  9,489  8,678  8,005 

Fee and commission expense

  (1,082) (970) (828)

Net fee and commission income

  8,407  7,708  7,177 

Principal transactions

    

Rates related business

  4,751  4,162  2,848 

Credit related business

  (3,422) (403) 766 

Net investment income

  680  1,216  962 

Principal transactions

  2,009  4,975  4,576 

Net premiums from insurances contracts

  1,090  1,011  1,060 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  (237) (492) (575)

Other income

  377  188  214 

Total income net of insurance claims

  23,115  23,000  21,595 

Interest income

Cash and balances with central banks interest income consists of interest income from cash on deposit with central banks. Available for sale investments interest income consists of the interest yield on debt securities, treasury bills and other eligible bills. Loans and advances to banks interest income consists of interest income from loans and advances to other banks. Loans and advances to customers interest income consists of interest income from loans, mortgages, advances and credit cards to customers. Other interest income principally consists of interest income relating to reverse repurchase agreements.

Interest expense

Deposits from banks interest expense consists of interest expense paid to other banks on their deposits with Barclays. Customer accounts interest expense consists of interest expense paid to customers on their current and savings account with Barclays. Debt securities in issue interest expense consists of interest expense paid to customers who hold Barclays debt securities in issue. Subordinated liabilities interest expense consists of interest expense paid to customers who hold Barclays subordinated liabilities. Other interest expense principally consists of interest expense relating to repurchase agreements and hedging activity.

Fee and commission income

Brokerage fees income consists of fees charged to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. The brokerage fee is charged for services such as negotiations, sales, purchases, delivery or advice on the transaction. Investment management fees are levied on assets under management. Securities lending fees are charged when stock is lent to third parties. Banking and credit related fees and commissions consist of fees and commissions charged on banking and credit card transactions. Foreign exchange commissions are earned on foreign exchange transactions with customers.

Fee and commission expense

Fee and commission expense consists of fees paid to third parties to facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. The fee is charged for services such as negotiations, sales, purchases, delivery or advice on the transaction.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

283


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2008

53 Segmental reporting (continued)

Principal transactions

Rates and Credit related business consists of profits and losses arising both on the purchase and sale of trading instruments and from the revaluation to market value together with the interest income and expense from these instruments and the related funding costs. Net investment income consists of the net gain from disposal of available for sale assets, dividend income, net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value and other investment income.

Total income net of insurance claims

Net premiums from insurance contracts consists of gross premiums from insurance contracts and premiums ceded to reinsurers. Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts consists of gross claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts and reinsurers’ share of claims incurred. Other income consists of increase in fair value of assets held under linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts, increase in liabilities to customers under investment contracts, property rentals and other income.

Geographical information

(i) A geographical analysis of revenues from external customers is presented below:

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m

Attributed to the UK

  12,277  13,127  12,154

Attributed to other regions

      

Other European Union

  3,633  3,374  2,882

United States

  710  2,209  2,840

Africa

  3,633  3,188  2,791

Rest of the World

  2,862  1,102  928

Total

  23,115  23,000  21,595

 

Individual countries included in Other European Union, Africa and Rest of the World contributing to more than 5% of income from external customers are as follows:

 

 

South Africa

  

 

2,618

  

 

2,374

  

 

2,359

284

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC data

 

BarclaysConsolidated income statement

Annual Report 2007

  246

286

Consolidated balance sheet

287

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense

288

Consolidated cash flow statement

289

Notes to the accounts

290

Financial data

299


LOGO

51 Segmental reporting

Business segments

The Group reports the results of its operations through seven business segments: UK Banking, Barclaycard, International Retail and Commercial Banking, Barclays Capital, Barclays Global Investors, Barclays Wealth, and Head Office and other operations.

UK Banking provides banking solutions to Barclays UK retail and commercial banking customers. Barclaycard provides credit card services across Europe and the United States. International Retail and Commercial Banking provides banking services to personal and corporate customers in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Barclays Capital conducts the Group’s investment banking business providing corporate, institutional and government clients with financing and risk management products. Barclays Global Investors provides investment management products and services to international institutional clients. Barclays Wealth provides banking and asset management services to affluent and high net worth clients. Head Office functions and other operations comprise all the Group’s central function costs and other central items including businesses in transition.

During 2007 Barclays realigned a number of reportable business segments to better reflect the type of client served, the nature of the products offered and the associated risks and rewards. The changes have no impact on the Group Income Statement or Balance Sheet, and are summarised as follows:

UK Retail Banking. The unsecured lending business, previously managed and reported within Barclaycard and the Barclays Financial Planning business, previously managed and reported within Barclays Wealth are now managed and reported within UK Retail Banking. The changes combine these products with related products already offered by UK Retail Banking. In the UK certain UK Premier customers are now managed and reported within Barclays Wealth.

Barclaycard. The unsecured lending portfolio, previously managed and reported within Barclaycard, is now managed and reported within UK Retail Banking.

International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa. A number of high net worth customers are now managed and reported within Barclays Wealth in order to better match client profiles to wealth services.

Barclays Wealth. In the UK and Western Europe certain Premier and high net worth customers are now managed and reported within Barclays Wealth having been previously reported within UK Retail Banking and International Retail and Commercial Banking – excluding Absa.

The Barclays Financial Planning business previously managed and reported within Barclays Wealth, is now managed and reported within UK Retail Banking. Finally with effect from 1st January 2007 Barclays Wealth – closed life assurance activities continues to be managed within Barclays Wealth and for reporting purposes has been combined rather than being reported separately.

The structure and reporting remains unchanged for Barclays Commercial Bank, International Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa, Barclays Capital and Barclays Global Investors.

All transactions between business segments are conducted on an arms length basis. Internal charges and transfer pricing adjustments are reflected in the performance of each business. Head office functions and other operations contains a centralised treasury function, which deals with the Group’s funding requirements. The funding requirements of each business segment reflects funding at market rates and not internally generated transfer prices and is therefore not separately disclosed within inter-segment net income.


 

247 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 285


Notes to the accounts

For the year ended 31st December 2007

51 Segmental reporting (continued)

As at 31st December 2007  UK
Banking
£m
  Barclaycard
£m
  

International
Retail and
Commercial
Banking

£m

  Barclays
Capital
£m
  Barclays
Global
Investors
£m
  Barclays
Wealth
£m
  Head office
functions
and other
operations
£m
  

Total

£m

 
Income from external customers, net of insurance claims  6,913  2,340  3,510  6,934  1,915  1,343  45  23,000 

Inter-segment income

  (62) 146  13  185  11  (56) (237)  

Total income net of insurance claims

  6,851  2,486  3,523  7,119  1,926  1,287  (192) 23,000 
Impairment charge and other credit provisions  (849) (838) (252) (846)   (7) (3) (2,795)

Segment expenses – external

  (2,521) (909) (3,494) (3,989) (1,180) (829) (277) (13,199)

Inter-segment expenses

  (849) (192) 1,138  16  (12) (144) 43   

Total expenses

  (3,370) (1,101) (2,356) (3,973) (1,192) (973) (234) (13,199)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  7  (7) 7  35        42 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures  14    13        1  28 
         
Business segment performance before tax  2,653  540  935  2,335  734  307  (428) 7,076 

Additional information

         

Depreciation and amortisation

  107  57  242  181  22  18  26  653 

Impairment loss – intangible assets

  13    1          14 

Capital expenditure a

  393  105  456  407  687  196  55  2,299 
Investments in associates and joint ventures  (6) 19  108  171      85  377 
         

Total assets

  161,777  22,164  89,457  839,662  89,224  18,024  7,053  1,227,361 

Total liabilities

  166,988  1,559  48,809  811,516  87,101  43,988  34,924  1,194,885 

As at 31st December 2006  UK
Banking
£m
  Barclaycard
£m
  

International
Retail and
Commercial
Banking

£m

  Barclays
Capital
£m
  Barclays
Global
Investors
£m
  Barclays
Wealth
£m
  Head office
functions
and other
operations
£m
  Total
£m
 
Income from external customers, net of insurance claims  6,804  2,355  3,220  6,206  1,670  1,198  142  21,595 

Inter-segment income

  (63) 159  29  61  (5) (38) (143)  
Total income net of insurance claims  6,741  2,514  3,249  6,267  1,665  1,160  (1) 21,595 
Impairment charge and other credit provisions  (887) (1,067) (167) (42)   (2) 11  (2,154)

Segment expenses – external

  (2,626) (712) (2,177) (3,988) (940) (772) (1,459) (12,674)

Inter-segment expenses

  (763) (269) 15  (21) (11) (141) 1,190   
Total expenses  (3,389) (981) (2,162) (4,009) (951) (913) (269) (12,674)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  5  (8) 49          46 
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures  76    247          323 
         
Business segment performance before tax  2,546  458  1,216  2,216  714  245  (259) 7,136 
Additional information         

Depreciation and amortisation

  96  45  180  132  13  10  115  591 

Impairment loss – intangible assets

      7          7 

Capital expenditurea

  232  84  206  246  406  45  152  1,371 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

  12  89  56  71        228 
         

Total assets

  147,576  20,082  68,588  657,922  80,515  15,022  7,082  996,787 

Total liabilities

  156,906  1,812  37,031  632,208  79,366  37,652  24,422  969,397 

Note

aCapital expenditure comprises purchased goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired during the year.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

248


LOGO

51 Segmental reporting (continued)

As at 31st December 2005

  UK
Banking
£m
 
 
 
 Barclaycard

£m

 

 

 International

Retail and

Commercial

Banking

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 Barclays

Capital

£m

 

 

 

 Barclays

Global

Investors

£m

 

 

 

 

 Barclays

Wealth

£m

 

 

 

 Head office

functions

and other

operations

£m

 

 

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

 

Income from external customers, net of insurance claims

  6,240  2,138  1,904  4,388  1,318  1,051  294  17,333 
Inter-segment income  (4) 161  12  117    (17) (269)  
Total income net of insurance claims  6,236  2,299  1,916  4,505  1,318  1,034  25  17,333 
Impairment charge and other credit provisions  (671) (753) (33) (111)   (2) (1) (1,571)
Segment expenses – external  (2,663) (736) (1,338) (2,952) (769) (765) (1,304) (10,527)
Inter-segment expenses  (663) (172) 2  (11) (10) (103) 957   
Total expenses  (3,326) (908) (1,336) (2,963) (779) (868) (347) (10,527)
Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures  (3) 1  46    1      45 
Business segment performance before tax  2,236  639  593  1,431  540  164  (323) 5,280 
Additional information         
Depreciation and amortisation  54  40  111  99  10  8  119  441 
Impairment loss – intangible assets    6  3          9 
Capital expenditurea  78  153  2,580  294  155  14  192  3,466 
Investments in associates and joint ventures  31  80  415  20        546 

Total assets

  137,981  18,236  63,383  601,193  80,900  13,401  9,263  924,357 

Total liabilities

  140,658  1,561  34,458  576,350  80,115  34,802  31,983  899,927 
Geographic segments         

Year ended 31st December 2007

 

    United

Kingdom

£m

 

 

 

 Other

European

Union

£m

 

 

 

 

 United

States

£m

 

 

 

 Africa

£m

 

 

 Rest of

the World

£m

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

Total income net of insurance claims    13,127  3,374  2,209  3,188  1,102  23,000 
Total assets (by location of asset)    429,443  285,719  301,973  56,117  154,109  1,227,361 
Capital expenditure (by location of asset)a    894  303  789  225  88  2,299 

Year ended 31st December 2006

 

    United

Kingdom

£m

 

 

 

 Other

European

Union

£m

 

 

 

 

 United

States

£m

 

 

 

 Africa

£m

 

 

 Rest of the

World

£m

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

Total income net of insurance claims    12,154  2,882  2,840  2,791  928  21,595 
Total assets (by location of asset)    406,328  203,929  229,779  44,696  112,055  996,787 
Capital expenditure (by location of asset)a    569  62  565  136  39  1,371 

Year ended 31st December 2005

 

    United

Kingdom

£m

 

 

 

 Other

European

Union

£m

 

 

 

 

 United

States

£m

 

 

 

 Africa

£m

 

 

 Rest of the

World

£m

 

 

 

 Total

£m

 

 

Total income net of insurance claims    10,697  1,995  2,421  1,445  775  17,333 
Total assets (by location of asset)    348,703  196,965  230,200  48,803  99,686  924,357 
Capital expenditure (by location of asset)a        449  119  276  2,586  36  3,466 

Note

aCapital expenditure comprises purchased goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired during the year.

249

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Barclays Bank PLC data

Consolidated income statement

Consolidated income statement

For the year ended 31st December

 

  Notes  

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 

2005

£m

   Notes  

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 

Continuing operations

            

Interest income

  a  25,308  21,805  17,232   a  28,010  25,308  21,805 

Interest expense

  a  (15,707) (12,662) (9,157)  a  (16,595) (15,707) (12,662)

Net interest income

     9,601  9,143  8,075      11,415  9,601  9,143 

Fee and commission income

  b  8,682  8,005  6,430   b  9,489  8,682  8,005 

Fee and commission expense

  b  (970) (828) (725)  b  (1,082) (970) (828)

Net fee and commission income

     7,712  7,177  5,705      8,407  7,712  7,177 

Net trading income

  c  3,759  3,632  2,321   c  1,260  3,759  3,632 

Net investment income

  c  1,216  962  858   c  680  1,216  962 

Principal transactions

     4,975  4,594  3,179      1,940  4,975  4,594 

Net premiums from insurance contracts

  5  1,011  1,060  872   5  1,090  1,011  1,060 

Other income

  d  224  257  178   f  454  224  257 

Total income

    23,523  22,231  18,009     23,306  23,523  22,231 

Net claims and benefits incurred on insurance contracts

  5  (492) (575) (645)  5  (237) (492) (575)

Total income net of insurance claims

    23,031  21,656  17,364     23,069  23,031  21,656 

Impairment charges

  7  (2,795) (2,154) (1,571)  7  (5,419) (2,795) (2,154)

Net income

     20,236  19,502  15,793      17,650  20,236  19,502 

Staff costs

  8  (8,405) (8,169) (6,318)  8  (7,779) (8,405) (8,169)

Administration and general expenses

  9  (4,141) (3,914) (3,768)  d  (5,662) (4,141) (3,914)

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

  23  (467) (455) (362)  23  (630) (467) (455)

Amortisation of intangible assets

  22  (186) (136) (79)  22  (291) (186) (136)

Operating expenses

     (13,199) (12,674) (10,527)     (14,362) (13,199) (12,674)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  20  42  46  45   20  14  42  46 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

     28  323       327  28  323 

Gains on acquisitions

  39  2,406     

Profit before tax

    7,107  7,197  5,311     6,035  7,107  7,197 

Tax

  10  (1,981) (1,941) (1,439)  e  (786) (1,981) (1,941)

Profit after tax

     5,126  5,256  3,872      5,249  5,126  5,256 

Profit attributable to minority interests

    377  342  177     403  377  342 

Profit attributable to equity holders

     4,749  4,914  3,695      4,846  4,749  4,914 
     5,126

 

 

 5,256

 

 

 3,872

 

 

     5,249

 

 

 

 5,126

 

 

 

 5,256

 

 

 

The note numbers refer to the notes on pages 166196 to 249,289, whereas the note letters refer to those on pages 254290 to 262.298.

 

286

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

250


LOGO

LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC data

Consolidated balance sheet

Consolidated balance sheet

As at 31st December

 

  Notes  2007

£m

 

 

 2006

£m

 

 

  Notes  

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

 

Assets

           

Cash and balances at central banks

    5,801  6,795     30,019  5,801 

Items in the course of collection from other banks

    1,836  2,408     1,695  1,836 

Trading portfolio assets

  e  193,726  177,884   g  185,646  193,726 

Financial assets designated at fair value:

           

– held on own account

  13  56,629  31,799   13  54,542  56,629 

– held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  13  90,851  82,798   13  66,657  90,851 

Derivative financial instruments

  14  248,088  138,353   14  984,802  248,088 

Loans and advances to banks

  15  40,120  30,926   15  47,707  40,120 

Loans and advances to customers

  15  345,398  282,300   15  461,815  345,398 

Available for sale financial investments

  f  43,256  51,952   h  65,016  43,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  17  183,075  174,090   17  130,354  183,075 

Other assets

  g  5,153  5,850   i  6,302  5,153 

Current tax assets

  19  518  557     389  518 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

  20  377  228   20  341  377 

Goodwill

  21  7,014  6,092   21  7,625  7,014 

Intangible assets

  22  1,282  1,215   22  2,777  1,282 

Property, plant and equipment

  23  2,996  2,492   23  4,674  2,996 

Deferred tax assets

  19  1,463  764   19  2,668  1,463 

Total assets

     1,227,583  996,503      2,053,029  1,227,583 

Liabilities

           

Deposits from banks

    90,546  79,562     114,910  90,546 

Items in the course of collection due to other banks

    1,792  2,221     1,635  1,792 

Customer accounts

    295,849  256,754     335,533  295,849 

Trading portfolio liabilities

  e  65,402  71,874   12  59,474  65,402 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  24  74,489  53,987   24  76,892  74,489 

Liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  13  92,639  84,637   13  69,183  92,639 

Derivative financial instruments

  14  248,288  140,697   14  968,072  248,288 

Debt securities in issue

    120,228  111,137     153,426  120,228 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  17  169,429  136,956   17  182,285  169,429 

Other liabilities

  h  10,514  10,337   j  12,640  10,514 

Current tax liabilities

  19  1,311  1,020     1,215  1,311 

Insurance contract liabilities, including unit-linked liabilities

  26  3,903  3,878   26  2,152  3,903 

Subordinated liabilities

  27  18,150  13,786   27  29,842  18,150 

Deferred tax liabilities

  19  855  282   19  304  855 

Provisions

  28  830  462   28  535  830 

Retirement benefit liabilities

  30  1,537  1,807   30  1,357  1,537 

Total liabilities

     1,195,762  969,397      2,009,455  1,195,762 

Shareholders’ equity

           

Called up share capital

  i  2,382  2,363   k  2,398  2,382 

Share premium account

  i  10,751  9,452   k  12,060  10,751 

Other reserves

  j  (170) (484)  l  1,723  (170)

Other shareholders’ equity

  k  2,687  2,534   m  2,564  2,687 

Retained earnings

  j  14,222  11,556   l  22,457  14,222 

Shareholders’ equity excluding minority interests

    29,872  25,421     41,202  29,872 

Minority interests

  l  1,949  1,685   n  2,372  1,949 

Total shareholders’ equity

     31,821  27,106      43,574  31,821 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     1,227,583  996,503      2,053,029  1,227,583 

The note numbers refer to the notes on pages 166196 to 249,284, whereas the note letters refer to those on pages 254290 to 262.298.

These financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 7th5th March 2008.2009.

 

251 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 287


Barclays Bank PLC data

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense

For the year ended 31st December

 

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense

For the year ended 31st December

    
  2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m
 

Available for sale reserve:

        

– Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

  389  107  (217)

– Net (losses)/gains from changes in fair value

  (1,757) 389  107 

– Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

  13  86     382  13  86 

– Net gains transferred to net profit on disposal

  (563) (327) (120)  (209) (563) (327)

– Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  68  14  260 

– Net (gains)/losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  (2) 68  14 

Cash flow hedging reserve:

        

– Net gains/(losses) from changes in fair value

  106  (437) (50)  305  106  (437)

– Net losses/(gains) transferred to net profit

  253  (50) (69)  71  253  (50)

Currency translation differences

  54  (781) 300   2,407  54  (781)

Tax

  54  253  50   841  54  253 

Other

  22  25  (102)  (56) 22  25 

Amounts included directly in equity

  396  (1,110) 52   1,982  396  (1,110)

Profit after tax

  5,126  5,256  3,872   5,249  5,126  5,256 

Total recognised income and expense for the year

  5,522  4,146  3,924   7,231  5,522  4,146 

Attributable to:

        

Equity holders

  5,135  4,132  3,659   6,654  5,135  4,132 

Minority interests

  387  14  265   577  387  14 
  5,522

 

 

 4,146

 

 

 3,924

 

 

  7,231

 

 

 

 5,522

 

 

 

 4,146

 

 

 

 

288

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

252


LOGO

LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC data

Consolidated cash flow statement

Consolidated cash flow statement

For the year ended 31st December

 

        2007
£m
      2006
£m
      

2005

£m

    

Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities:

           

Profit before tax

    7,107    7,197    5,311  

Adjustment for non-cash items:

           

Allowance for impairment

    2,795    2,154    1,571  

Depreciation and amortisation and impairment of property, plant, equipment and intangibles

    669    612    450  

Other provisions, including pensions

    753    558    654  

Net profit from associates and joint ventures

    (42)   (46)   (45) 

Net profit on disposal of investments and property, plant and equipment

    (862)   (778)   (530) 

Net profit from disposal of associates and joint ventures

    (26)   (263)     

Net profit from disposal of subsidiaries

    (2)   (60)     

Other non-cash movements

    (1,471)   1,661    1,505  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

           

Net (increase) in loans and advances to banks and customers

    (77,987)   (27,385)   (63,177) 

Net increase in deposits and debt securities in issue

    91,451    46,944    67,012  

Net (increase)/decrease in derivative financial instruments

    (2,144)   1,196    841  

Net (increase) in trading portfolio assets

    (18,245)   (18,333)   (42,585) 

Net (decrease)/increase in trading liabilities

    (6,472)   310    9,888  

Net (increase)/decrease in financial investments

    (4,379)   1,538    27,129  

Net (increase)/decrease in other assets

    1,296    (1,527)   (411) 

Net (decrease) in other liabilities

    (1,056)   (1,580)   (2,852) 

Tax paid

 

     (1,583)    (2,141)    (1,082)  

Net cash from operating activities

 

     (10,198)    10,057     3,679   

Purchase of available for sale investments

    (26,947)   (47,109)   (53,626) 

Proceeds from sale or redemption of available for sale investments

    38,423    46,069    51,114  

Purchase of intangible assets

    (263)   (212)   (91) 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

    (1,241)   (654)   (588) 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

    617    786    98  

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

    (270)   (248)   (2,115) 

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

    383    (15)     

Increase in investment in subsidiaries

    (668)   (432)   (160) 

Decrease in investment in subsidiaries

    57    44    49  

Acquisition of associates and joint ventures

    (220)   (162)   (176) 

Disposal of associates and joint ventures

    145    739    40  

Other cash flows associated with investing activities

 

          17     23   

Net cash used in investing activities

 

     10,016     (1,177)    (5,432)  

Dividends paid

    (3,418)   (2,373)   (2,325) 

Proceeds from borrowings and issuance of debt securities

    4,625    2,493    1,179  

Repayments of borrowings and redemption of debt securities

    (683)   (366)   (464) 

Issue of shares and other equity instruments

    1,355    585    2,383  

Capital injection from Barclays PLC

    1,434          

Net issues of shares to minority interests

 

     199     226     20   

Net cash from financing activities

 

     3,512     565     793   

Exchange (loss)/gain on foreign currency cash and cash equivalents

 

     (654)    552     (237)  

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

     2,676     9,997     (1,197)  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

     30,402     20,405     21,602   

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

     33,078     30,402     20,405   

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

           

Cash in hand

    5,801    6,795    3,506  

Loans and advances to banks

    40,120    30,926    31,105  

Less: amounts with original maturity greater than three months

    (19,376)   (15,892)   (17,987) 
    20,744    15,034    13,118  

Available for sale financial investments

    43,256    51,952    53,703  

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

    (41,872)   (50,933)   (53,487) 
    1,384    1,019    216  

Trading portfolio assets

    193,726    177,884    155,730  

Less: non-cash and amounts with maturity greater than three months

    (188,591   (170,346   (152,190 
    5,135    7,538    3,540  

Other

     14     16     25   
      33,078

 

 

    30,402

 

 

    20,405

 

 

  

In 2005, the opening cash and cash equivalents balance was adjusted to reflect the adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39.

    

2008

£m

      

2007

£m

      

2006

£m

 

Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities:

        

Profit before tax

  6,035    7,107    7,197 

Adjustment for non-cash items:

        

Allowance for impairment

  5,419    2,795    2,154 

Depreciation and amortisation and impairment of property, plant, equipment and intangibles

  951    669    612 

Other provisions, including pensions

  804    753    558 

Net profit from associates and joint ventures

  (14)   (42)   (46)

Net profit on disposal of investments and property, plant and equipment

  (371)   (862)   (778)

Net profit from disposal of associates and joint ventures

      (26)   (263)

Net profit from disposal of subsidiaries

  (327)   (2)   (60)

Net gains on acquisitions

  (2,406)        

Other non-cash movements

  830    (1,471)   1,661 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Net increase in loans and advances to banks and customers

  (58,432)   (77,987)   (27,385)

Net increase in deposits and debt securities in issue

  76,886    91,451    46,944 

Net (increase)/decrease in derivative financial instruments

  (17,529)   (2,144)   1,196 

Net decrease/(increase) in trading portfolio assets

  26,945    (18,245)   (18,333)

Net (decrease)/increase in trading liabilities

  (5,928)   (6,472)   310 

Net decrease/(increase) in financial investments

  5,229    (4,379)   1,538 

Net (increase)/decrease in other assets

  (3,005)   1,296    (1,527)

Net decrease in other liabilities

  (492)   (1,056)   (1,580)

Tax paid

 

  (1,725)    (1,583)    (2,141)

Net cash from operating activities

 

  32,870     (10,198)    10,057 

Purchase of available for sale financial investments

  (57,756)   (26,947)   (47,109)

Proceeds from sale or redemption of available for sale financial investments

  51,429    38,423    46,069 

Purchase of intangible assets

  (687)   (263)   (212)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  (1,720)   (1,241)   (654)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

  799    617    786 

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

  (961)   (270)   (248)

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

  238    383    (15)

Increase in investment in subsidiaries

  (157)   (668)   (432)

Decrease in investment in subsidiaries

  19    57    44 

Acquisition of associates and joint ventures

  (96)   (220)   (162)

Disposal of associates and joint ventures

  137    145    739 

Other cash flows associated with investing activities

 

            17 

Net cash from investing activities

 

  (8,755)    10,016     (1,177)

Dividends paid

  (1,796)   (3,418)   (2,373)

Proceeds from borrowings and issuance of debt securities

  9,645    4,625    2,493 

Repayments of borrowings and redemption of debt securities

  (1,207)   (683)   (366)

Net issue of shares and other equity instruments

  1,327    1,355    585 

Capital injection from Barclays PLC

  5,137    1,434     

Net issues of shares to minority interests

 

  11     199     226 

Net cash from financing activities

 

  13,117     3,512     565 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

  (5,801)    (654)    552 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

  31,431     2,676     9,997 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

  33,078     30,402     20,405 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

  64,509     33,078     30,402 

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

        

Cash and balances at central banks

  30,019    5,801    6,795 

Loans and advances to banks

  47,707    40,120    30,926 

Less: non-cash amounts and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (15,428)   (19,376)   (15,892)
  32,279    20,744    15,034 

Available for sale treasury and other eligible bills

  65,016    43,256    51,952 

Less: non-cash and amounts with original maturity greater than three months

  (62,916)   (41,872)   (50,933)
  2,100    1,384    1,019 

Trading portfolio assets

  185,646    193,726    177,884 

Less: non-cash and amounts with maturity greater than three months

  (185,535)   (188,591)   (170,346)
  111    5,135    7,538 

Other

       14     16 
   64,509

 

 

 

    33,078

 

 

 

    30,402

 

 

 

 

253 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 289


Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

a Net interest income

 

  

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 2005
£m
 
  

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

2006

£m

 

Cash and balances with central banks

  145  91  9   174  145  91 

Available for sale investments

  2,580  2,811  2,272   2,355  2,580  2,811 

Loans and advances to banks

  1,416  903  690   1,267  1,416  903 

Loans and advances to customers

  19,559  16,290  12,944   23,754  19,559  16,290 

Other

  1,608  1,710  1,317   460  1,608  1,710 

Interest income

  25,308  21,805  17,232   28,010  25,308  21,805 

Deposits from banks

  (2,720) (2,819) (2,056)  (2,189) (2,720) (2,819)

Customer accounts

  (4,110) (3,076) (2,715)  (6,714) (4,110) (3,076)

Debt securities in issue

  (6,651) (5,282) (3,268)  (5,947) (6,651) (5,282)

Subordinated liabilities

  (878) (777) (605)  (1,349) (878) (777)

Other

  (1,348) (708) (513)  (396) (1,348) (708)

Interest expense

  (15,707) (12,662) (9,157)  (16,595) (15,707) (12,662)

Net interest income

  9,601  9,143  8,075   11,415  9,601  9,143 

Interest income includes £135m (2007: £113m, (2006: £98m, 2005: £76m)2006: £98m) accrued on impaired loans.

Other interest income principally includes interest income relating to reverse repurchase agreements. Similarly, other interest expense principally includes interest expense relating to repurchase agreements and hedging activity.

Included in net interest income is hedge ineffectiveness as detailed in Note 14.

b Net fee and commission income

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2005
£m
 

Fee and commission income

    

Brokerage fees

  109  70  64 

Investment management fees

  1,787  1,535  1,250 

Securities lending

  241  185  151 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  6,367  6,031  4,805 

Foreign exchange commissions

 

  178  184  160 

Fee and commission income

 

  8,682  8,005  6,430 

Brokerage fees paid

 

  (970) (828) (725)

Fee and commission expense

 

  (970) (828) (725)

Net fee and commission income

 

  7,712  7,177  5,705 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

254


LOGO

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Fee and commission income

    

Brokerage fees

  87  109  70 

Investment management fees

  1,616  1,787  1,535 

Securities lending

  389  241  185 

Banking and credit related fees and commissions

  7,208  6,367  6,031 

Foreign exchange commissions

  189  178  184 

Fee and commission income

  9,489  8,682  8,005 

Fee and commission expense

  (1,082) (970) (828)

Net fee and commission in come

  8,407  7,712  7,177 

c Principal transactions

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
  2005
£m
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 2006
£m

Rates related business

  4,162  2,866  1,732  4,682  4,162  2,866

Credit related business

  (403) 766  589  (3,422) (403) 766

Net trading income

  3,759  3,632  2,321

Gain from disposal of available for sale assets/investment securities

  560  307  120

Dividend income on equity investments

  26  15  22

Net trading in come

  1,260  3,759  3,632

Net gain from disposal of available for sale assets

  212  560  307

Dividend income

  196  26  15

Net gain from financial instruments designated at fair value

  293  447  389  33  293  447

Other investment income

  337  193  327  239  337  193

Net investment income

  1,216  962  858

Net investment in come

  680  1,216  962

Principal transactions

  4,975  4,594  3,179  1,940  4,975  4,594

Net trading income includes the profits and losses arising both on the purchase and sale of trading instruments and from the revaluation to marketfair value, together with the interest income and expenseearned from these instruments and the related funding cost.

Of the total net trading income, a £756m£2,096m net loss (2006: £947m gain, 2005: £498m(2007: £116m loss, 2006: £1,427m gain) was made on the purchase and sale of securities and the revaluation of both securities and derivatives. This included a £1,272m gain (2007: £640m gain, (2006:2006: £480m 2005: £340m)gain) that was earned in foreign exchange dealings.

The net gainloss on financial assets designated at fair value included within principal transactions was £6,602m (2007: £78m (2006:gain, 2006: £489m 2005: £391m)gain) of which losses of £6,635m (2007: £215m (2006:loss, 2006: £42m gain, 2005: £2m gain) were included in net trading income and gains of £33m (2007: £293m, (2006: £447m, 2005: £389m)2006: £447m) were included in net investment income.

290

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

c Principal transactions(continued)

The net lossgain on financial liabilities designated at fair value included within principal transactions was £3,328m (2007: £231m (2006:loss, 2006: £920m 2005: £666m)loss), all of which was included within net trading income.

TheNet trading income includes the net gain from widening of credit spreads relating to Barclays Capital issued notes held at fair value was £1,663m (2007: £658m, (2006: £nil, 2005:2006: £nil).

d Other incomeAdministration and general expenses

 

   2007
£m
 
 
 2006
£m
 
 
 2005
£m
 
 

Increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  5,592  7,417  9,234 

Increase in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (5,592) (7,417) (9,234)

Property rentals

  53  55  54 

Other income

 

  171  202  124 

Other income

 

  224  257  178 

Included in other income are sub-lease receipts of £18m (2006: £18m, 2005: £18m).

Included in other income in 2007 is a loss on the part disposal of Monument credit card portfolio and gains on reinsurance transactions in 2007 and 2006.

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Administrative expenses

  5,149  3,978  3,980 

Impairment charges/(releases):

    

– property and equipment (Note 23)

  33  2  14 

– intangible assets (Note 22)

  (3) 14  7 

– goodwill (Note 21)

  111     

Operating lease rentals

  520  414  345 

Gain on property disposals

  (148) (267) (432)

Administration and general expenses

  5,662  4,141  3,914 

e Trading portfolio assetsAuditors’ remuneration

 

      2007
£m
  2006
£m

Trading portfolio assets

      

Treasury and other eligible bills

    2,094  2,960

Debt securities

    152,778  140,576

Equity securities

    36,342  31,565

Traded loans

    1,780  1,843

Commodities

     732  940

Trading portfolio assets

 

     193,726  177,884
    2008
    Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  12        12

Other services:

          

Fees payable for the audit of the Bank’s associates pursuant to legislation

  20        20

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation

    2      2

Other services relating to taxation

      10    10
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed
to be entered into by or on behalf of the Bank or any of its associates
        3  3

Other

    4    1  5

Total auditors’ remuneration

  32  6  10  4  52
    2007
    Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  7        7

Other services:

          

Fees payable for the audit of the Bank’s associates pursuant to legislation

  12        12

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation

  6  2      8

Other services relating to taxation

      8    8
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed
to be entered into by or on behalf of the Bank or any of its associates
        5  5

Other

    2    2  4

Total auditors’ remuneration

  25  4  8  7  44
    2006
    Audit
£m
  Audit
related
£m
  Taxation
services
£m
  Other
services
£m
  Total
£m

Audit of the Group’s annual accounts

  7        7

Other services:

          

Fees payable for the audit of the Bank’s associates pursuant to legislation

  11        11

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation

  10  1      11

Other services relating to taxation

      6    6
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed
to be entered into by or on behalf of the Bank or any of its associates
        4  4

Other

    4    1  5

Total auditors’ remuneration

  28  5  6  5  44

The figures shown in the above table relate to fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its associates. Fees paid to other auditors not associated with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of the audit of the Bank’s subsidiaries were £3m (2007: £2m, 2006: £2m).

 

255 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 291


Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

d Administration and general expenses(continued)

Fees payable for the audit of the Bank’s associates pursuant to legislation comprise the fees for the statutory audit of the subsidiaries and associated pension schemes both inside and outside Great Britain and fees for the work performed by the associates of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of the consolidated financial statements of the Bank. The fees relating to the audit of the associated pension schemes were £0.2m (2007: £0.3m, 2006: £0.3m).

Other services supplied pursuant to such legislation comprise services in relation to statutory and regulatory filings. These includes audit services for the review of the interim financial information under the Listing Rules of the UK listing authority and fees paid for reporting under Section 404 of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404). In 2008 fees paid for reporting under Section 404 are not separately identifiable from the fees of the audit of the Bank’s annual accounts and the Bank’s associates. Fees for the audit of Barclays Bank PLC Group accounts are not separately identifiable from Barclays PLC, therefore there is no difference in the amounts reported in both Annual Reports. In addition, other services include Section 404 advisory, reporting accountant work for capital raising, securitisations and services relating to acquisition activities.

Taxation services include compliance services such as tax return preparation and advisory services such as consultation on tax matters, tax advice relating to transactions and other tax planning and advice.

Services relating to corporate finance transactions comprise due diligence related to transactions and other work in connection with such transactions.

e Tax

The charge for tax is based upon the UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%) and comprises:

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Current tax charge/(credit)

    

Current year

  1,559  2,385  1,929 

Adjustment for prior years

  97  (11) 8 
   1,656  2,374  1,937 

Deferred tax (credit)/charge

    

Current year

  (597) (367) (16)

Adjustment for prior years

  (273) (26) 20 
   (870) (393) 4 

Total charge

  786  1,981  1,941 

 

The effective tax rate for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 is lower than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%). The differences are set out below:

 

  

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

Profit before tax

  6,035  7,107  7,197 

Tax charge at standard UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% (2007: 30%, 2006: 30%)

  1,720  2,132  2,159 

Adjustment for prior years

  (176) (37) 24 

Differing overseas tax rates

  215  (77) (17)

Non-taxable gains and income (including amounts offset by unrecognised tax losses)

  (833) (136) (393)

Share-based payments

  229  72  27 

Deferred tax assets not previously recognised

  (514) (158) (4)

Change in tax rates

  (1) 24  4 

Other non-allowable expenses

  146  161  141 

Overall tax charge

  786  1,981  1,941 

Effective tax rate

  13% 28% 27%

The effective rate of tax for 2008, based on profit before tax, was 13% (2007: 28%). The effective tax rate differs from the 2007 effective rate and the UK corporation tax rate of 28.5% principally due to the Lehman Brothers North American businesses acquisition. Under IFRS the gain on acquisition of £2,262m is calculated net of deferred tax liabilities included in the acquisition balance sheet and is thus not subject to further tax in calculating the tax charge for the year. Furthermore, Barclays has tax losses previously unrecognised as a deferred tax asset but capable of sheltering part of this deferred tax liability. This gives rise to a tax benefit of £492m which, in accordance with IAS 12, is included as a credit within the tax charge for the year. The effective rate has been adversely impacted by the effect of the fall in the Barclays share price on the deferred tax asset recognised on share awards. In common with prior years there have been offsetting adjustments relating to different overseas tax rates, disallowable expenditure and non taxable gains and income.

292

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

f Other income

 

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

 

(Decrease)/increase in fair value of assets held in respect of linked liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  (10,422) 5,592  7,417 

Decrease/(increase) in liabilities to customers under investment contracts

  10,422  (5,592) (7,417)

Property rentals

  73  53  55 

Other income

  381  171  202 

Other income

  454  224  257 

f Available for sale financial investmentsIncluded in other income are sub-lease rentals of £18m (2007: £18m, 2006: £18m), and in 2008 only is a £47m gain from the Visa IPO.

    

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

 

Debt securities

  38,673  47,912 

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  2,723  2,420 

Equity securities

 

  1,860  1,620 

Available for sale financial investments

 

  43,256  51,952 
   

Movement in available for sale financial investments

 

  

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

 

At beginning of year

  51,952  53,703 

Exchange and other adjustments

  1,499  (3,999)

Acquisitions and transfers

  26,950  47,109 

Disposals (sale and redemption)

  (37,498) (44,959)

Gains from changes in fair value recognised in equity

  391  182 

Impairment

  (13) (86)

Amortisation of discounts/premium

 

  (25) 2 

At end of year

 

  43,256  51,952 

g OtherTrading portfolio assets

 

  

2008

£m

 

2007

£m

 

Trading portfolio assets

   

Treasury and other eligible bills

  4,544  2,094 

Debt securities

  148,686  152,778 

Equity securities

  30,544  36,342 

Traded loans

  1,070  1,780 

Commodities

  802  732 

Trading portfolio assets

  185,646  193,726 

h Available for sale financial investments

   
  

2008

£m

 2007
£m
 

Debt securities

  58,831  38,673 

Treasury bills and other eligible bills

  4,003  2,723 

Equity securities

  2,182  1,860 

Available for sale financial investments

  65,016  43,256 
   

Movement in available for sale financial investments

   
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

At beginning of year

  43,256  51,952 

Exchange and other adjustments

  14,275  1,499 

Acquisitions and transfers

  59,703  26,950 

Disposals (through sale and redemption)

  (50,629) (37,498)

(Losses)/gains from changes in fair value recognised in equity

  (1,190) 391 

Impairment

  (382) (13)

Amortisation of discounts/premium

  (17) (25)

At end of year

  65,016  43,256 

i Other assets

   
  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
 2007
£m
 

Sundry debtors

  4,045  4,298  4,814  4,045 

Prepayments

  551  658  882  551 

Accrued income

  400  722  483  400 

Reinsurance assets

  157  172  123  157 

Other assets

  5,153  5,850  6,302  5,153 

Included in the above Group balances are £4,541m (2006: £5,065m)£4,704m (2007: £4,541m) expected to be recovered within no more than 12 months after the balance sheet date; and balances of £612m (2006: £785m)£1,598m (2007: £612m) expected to be recovered more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Other assets comprise £3,966m (2006: £4,097m)include £3,096m (2007: £3,966m) of receivables which meet the definition of financial assets.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

293


Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

hj Other liabilities

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

Accruals and deferred income

  6,075  6,127  6,495  6,075

Sundry creditors

  4,356  4,118  6,049  4,356

Obligations under finance leases

  83  92  96  83

Other liabilities

  10,514  10,337  12,640  10,514

Included in the above are balances of £9,058m (2006: £9,265m)£11,068m (2007: £9,058m) expected to be settled within no more than 12 months after the balance sheet date; and balances of £1,456m (2006: £1,072m)£1,572m (2007: £1,456m) expected to be settled more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Accruals and deferred income included £102m (2006: £107m)£nil (2007: £102m) in relation to deferred income from investment contracts and £677m (2006: £822m)£nil (2007: £677m) in relation to deferred income from insurance contracts for the Group.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

256


LOGO

ik Called up share capital

Ordinary Shares

The authorised ordinary share capital of the Bank, as at 31st December 2007,2008, was 3,000 million (2006:(2007: 3,000 million) ordinary shares of £1 each.

During the year, the Bank issued 71 million ordinary shares, with an aggregate nominal value of £7m, for cash consideration of £111m.£17m.

Preference Shares

The authorised preference share capital of Barclays Bank PLC, as at 31st December 2007,2008, was 1,000 Preference Shares (2006:(2007: 1,000) of £1; 400,000 Preference Shares of100 each (2006:(2007: 400,000); 400,000 Preference Shares of £100 each (2006:(2007: 400,000); 400,000 Preference Shares of US$100 each (2006:(2007: 400,000); 150300 million Preference Shares of US$0.25 each (2006: 80(2007: 150 million).

The issued preference share capital of Barclays Bank PLC, as at 31st December 2007,2008, comprised 1,000 (2006:(2007: 1,000) Sterling Preference Shares of £1 each; 240,000 (2006:(2007: 240,000) Euro Preference Shares of100 each; 75,000 (2006:(2007: 75,000) Sterling Preference Shares of £100 each; 100,000 (2006:(2007: 100,000) US Dollar Preference Shares of US$100 each; 131237 million (2006: 30(2007: 131 million) US Dollar Preference Shares of US$0.25 each.

 

   2007
£m
  2006
£m

Called up share capital, allotted and fully paid

    

At beginning of year

  2,329  2,318

Issued for cash

 

  7  11

At end of year

  2,336  2,329

Called up preference share capital, allotted and fully paid

    

At beginning of year

  34  30

Issued for cash

 

  12  4

At end of year

  46  34

Called up share capital

 

  2,382  2,363

Share premium

    

2008

£m

  

2007

£m

Called up share capital, allotted and fully paid

    

At beginning of year

  2,336  2,329

Issued for cash

  2  7

At end of year

  2,338  2,336

Called up preference share capital, allotted and fully paid

    

At beginning of year

  46  34

Issued for cash

  14  12

At end of year

  60  46

Called up share capital

  2,398  2,382
    

Share premium

      
    2008
£m
  2007
£m

At beginning of year

  10,751  9,452

Ordinary shares issued for cash

  15  104

Preference shares issued for cash

  1,294  1,195

At end of year

  12,060  10,751

 

   2007
£m
  2006
£m

 

At beginning of year

  9,452  8,882

Ordinary shares issued for cash

  104  168

Preference shares issued for cash

 

  1,195  402

At end of year

 

  10,751  9,452
294

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


LOGO

k Called up share capital(continued)

Sterling £1 Preference Shares

1,000 Sterling cumulative callable preference shares of £1 each (the ‘£1 Preference Shares’) were issued on 31st December 2004 at nil premium.

The £1 Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive sterlingSterling cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, semi-annually at a rate reset semi-annually equal to the sterlingSterling interbank offered rate for six-month sterling deposits.

Barclays Bank PLC shall be obliged to pay such dividends ifif: (1) it has profits available for the purpose of distribution under the Companies Act 1985 as at each dividend payment datedate; and (2) it is solvent on the relevant dividend payment date, provided that a capital regulations condition is satisfied on such dividend payment date. The dividends shall not be due and payable on the relevant dividend payment date except to the extent that Barclays Bank PLC could make such payment and still be solvent immediately thereafter. Barclays Bank PLC shall be considered solvent on any date ifif: (1) it is able to pay its debts to senior creditors as they fall duedue; and (2) its auditors have reported within the previous six months that its assets exceed its liabilities.

If Barclays Bank PLC shall not pay, or shall pay only in part, a dividend for a period of seven days or more after the due date for payment, the holders of the £1 Preference Shares may institute proceedings for the winding-up of Barclays Bank PLC. No remedy against Barclays Bank PLC shall be available to the holder of any £1 Preference Shares for the recovery of amounts owing in respect of £1 Preference Shares other than the institution of proceedings for the winding-up of Barclays Bank PLC and/or proving in such winding-up.

On a winding-up or other return of capital (other than a redemption or purchase by Barclays Bank PLC of any of its issued shares, or a reduction of share capital, permitted by the Articles of Barclays Bank PLC and under applicable law), the assets of Barclays Bank PLC available to shareholders shall be applied in priority to any payment to the holders of ordinary shares and any other class of shares in the capital of Barclays Bank PLC then in issue ranking junior to the £1 Preference Shares on such a return of capital and pari passu on such a return of capital with the holders of any other class of shares in the capital of Barclays Bank PLC then in issue (other than any class of shares in the capital of Barclays Bank PLC then in issue ranking in priority to the £1 Preference Shares on a winding-up or other such return of capital), in payment to the holders of the £1 Preference Shares of a sum equal to the aggregate of: (1) an amount equal to the dividends accrued thereon for the then current dividend period (and any accumulated arrears thereof) to the date of the commencement of the winding-up or other such return of capital; and (2) an amount equal to £1 per £1 Preference Share.

After payment of the full amount of the liquidating distributions to which they are entitled, the holders of the £1 Preference Shares will have no right or claim to any of the remaining assets of Barclays Bank PLC and will not be entitled to any further participation in such return of capital. The £1 Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, subject to the Companies Act 1985 and its Articles. Holders of the £1 Preference Shares are not entitled to receive notice of, or to attend, or vote at, any general meeting of Barclays Bank PLC.

257

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

i Called up share capital (continued)

Euro Preference Shares

100,000 Euro 4.875% non-cumulative callable preference shares of100 each (the ‘4.875% Preference Shares’) were issued on 8th December 2004 for a consideration of993.6m (£688.4m), of which the nominal value was10m and the balance was share premium. The 4.875% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive Euro non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, annually at a fixed rate of 4.875% per annum on the amount of10,000 per preference share until 15th December 2014, and thereafter quarterly at a rate reset quarterly equal to 1.05% per annum above the Euro interbank offered rate for three-month Euro deposits.

The 4.875% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, on 15th December 2014, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at10,000 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

140,000 Euro 4.75% non-cumulative callable preference shares of100 each (the ‘4.75% Preference Shares’) were issued on 15th March 2005 for a consideration of1,383.3m (£966.7m), of which the nominal value was14m and the balance was share premium. The 4.75% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive Euro non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, annually at a fixed rate of 4.75% per annum on the amount of10,000 per preference share until 15th March 2020, and thereafter quarterly at a rate reset quarterly equal to 0.71% per annum above the Euro interbank offered rate for three-month Euro deposits.

The 4.75% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, on 15th March 2020, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at10,000 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

Sterling Preference Shares

75,000 Sterling 6.0% non-cumulative callable preference shares of £100 each (the ‘6.0% Preference Shares’) were issued on 22nd June 2005 for a consideration of £732.6m, of which the nominal value was £7.5m and the balance was share premium. The 6.0% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive Sterling non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, annually at a fixed rate of 6.0% per annum on the amount of £10,000 per preference share until 15th December 2017, and thereafter quarterly at a rate reset quarterly equal to 1.42% per annum above the London interbank offered rate for three-month Sterling deposits.

The 6.0% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, on 15th December 2017, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at £10,000 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

US Dollar Preference Shares

100,000 US Dollar 6.278% non-cumulative callable preference shares of US$100 each (the ‘6.278% Preference Shares’), represented by 100,000 American Depositary Shares, Series 1, were issued on 8th June 2005 for a consideration of US$995.4m (£548.1m), of which the nominal value was US$10m and the balance was share premium. The 6.278% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive US Dollar non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, semi-annually at a fixed rate of 6.278% per annum on the amount of US$10,000 per preference share until 15th December 2034, and thereafter quarterly at a rate reset quarterly equal to 1.55% per annum above the London interbank offered rate for three-month US Dollar deposits.

The 6.278% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, on 15th December 2034, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at US$10,000 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

30 million US Dollar 6.625% non-cumulative callable preference shares of US$0.25 each (the ‘6.625% Preference Shares’), represented by 30 million American Depositary Shares, Series 2, were issued on 25th and 28th April 2006 for a consideration of US$727m (£406m), of which the nominal value was US$7.5m and the balance was share premium. The 6.625% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive US Dollar non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, quarterly at a fixed rate of 6.625% per annum on the amount of US$25 per preference share.

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

295


Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

k Called up share capital(continued)

The 6.625% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole but not in part only, on 15th September 2011, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at US$25 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

55 million US Dollar 7.1% non-cumulative callable preference shares of US$0.25 each (the ‘7.1% Preference Shares’), represented by 55 million American Depositary Shares, Series 3, were issued on 13th September 2007 for a consideration of US$1,335m (£657m), of which the nominal value was US$13.75m and the balance was share premium. The 7.1% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive US Dollar non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.1% per annum on the amount of US$25 per preference share.

The 7.1% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole or in part, on 15th December 2012, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at US$25 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

46 million US Dollar 7.75% non-cumulative callable preference shares of US$0.25 each (the ‘7.75% Preference Shares’), represented by 46 million American Depositary Shares, Series 4, were issued on 7th December 2007 for a consideration of US$1,116m (£550m), of which the nominal value was US$11.5m and the balance was share premium. The 7.75% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive US Dollar non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.75% per annum on the amount of US$25 per preference share.

The 7.75% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole or in part, on 15th December 2013, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at US$25 per share plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

258
106 million US Dollar 8.125% non-cumulative callable preference shares of US$0.25 each (the ‘8.125% Preference Shares’), represented by 106 million American Depositary Shares, Series 5, were issued on 11th April 2008 and 25th April 2008 for a total consideration of US$2,650m (£1,345m), of which the nominal value was US$26.5m and the balance was share premium. The 8.125% Preference Shares entitle the holders thereof to receive US Dollar non-cumulative cash dividends out of distributable profits of Barclays Bank PLC, quarterly at a fixed rate of 8.125% per annum on the amount of US$25 per preference share.


LOGO

i Called upThe 8.125% Preference Shares are redeemable at the option of Barclays Bank PLC, in whole or in part, on 15th June 2013, and on each dividend payment date thereafter at US$25 per share capital (continued)plus any dividends accrued for the then current dividend period to the date fixed for redemption.

No redemption or purchase of any 4.875% Preference Shares, the 4.75% Preference Shares, the 6.0% Preference Shares, the 6.278% Preference Shares, the 6.625% Preference Shares, the 7.1% Preference Shares, the 7.75% Preference Shares and the 7.75%8.125% Preference Shares (together, the ‘Preference Shares’) may be made by Barclays Bank PLC without the prior notification to the UK FSA and any such redemption will be subject to the Companies Act 1985 and the Articles of Barclays Bank PLC.

On a winding-up of Barclays Bank PLC or other return of capital (other than a redemption or purchase of shares of Barclays Bank PLC, or a reduction of share capital), a holder of Preference Shares will rank in the application of assets of Barclays Bank PLC available to shareholdersshareholders: (1) junior to the holder of any shares of Barclays Bank PLC in issue ranking in priority to the Preference Shares,Shares; (2) equally in all respects with holders of other preference shares and any other shares of Barclays Bank PLC in issue ranking pari passu with the Preference SharesShares; and (3) in priority to the holders of ordinary shares and any other shares of Barclays Bank PLC in issue ranking junior to the Preference Shares.

The holders of the £400m 6% Callable Perpetual Core Tier One Notes and the US$1,000m 6.86% Callable Perpetual Core Tier One Notes of Barclays Bank PLC (together, the ‘TONs’) and the holders of the US$1,250m 8.55% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, the US$750m 7.375% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, the850m 7.50% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, the £500m 5.3304% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, the US$1,350m 5.926% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, the £500m 6.3688% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments, and the US$1,250m 7.434% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments and the £3,000m 14% Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments of Barclays Bank PLC (together, the ‘RCIs’) would, for the purposes only of calculating the amounts payable in respect of such securities on a winding-up of Barclays Bank PLC, subject to limited exceptions and to the extent that the TONs and the RCIs are then in issue, rank pari passu with the holders of the most senior class or classes of preference shares then in issue in the capital of Barclays Bank PLC. Accordingly, the holders of the preference shares would rank equally with the holders of such TONs and RCIs on such a winding-up of Barclays Bank PLC (unless one or more classes of shares of Barclays Bank PLC ranking in priority to the preference shares are in issue at the time of such winding-up, in which event the holders of such TONs and RCIs would rank equally with the holders of such shares and in priority to the holders of the preference shares).

Subject to such ranking, in such event, holders of the preference shares will be entitled to receive out of assets of Barclays Bank PLC available for distributions to shareholders, liquidating distributions in the amount of10,000 per 4.875% Preference Share,10,000 per 4.75% Preference Share, £10,000 per 6.0% Preference Share, US$10,000 per 6.278% Preference Share, US$25 per 6.625% Preference Share, US$25 per 7.1% Preference Share, and US$25 per 7.75% Preference Share and US$0.25 per 8.125% Preference Share, plus, in each case, an amount equal to the accrued dividend for the then current dividend period to the date of the commencement of the winding-up or other such return of capital. If a dividend is not paid in full on any preference shares on any dividend payment date, then a dividend restriction shall apply.

This dividend restriction will mean that neither Barclays Bank PLC nor Barclays PLC may (a) declare or pay a dividend (other than payment by Barclays PLC of a final dividend declared by its shareholders prior to the relevant dividend payment date, or a dividend paid by Barclays Bank PLC to Barclays PLC or to a wholly owned subsidiary) on any of their respective ordinary shares, other preference shares or other share capital or (b) redeem, purchase, reduce or otherwise acquire any of their respective share capital, other than shares of Barclays Bank PLC held by Barclays PLC or a wholly owned subsidiary, until the earlier ofof: (1) the date on which Barclays Bank PLC next declares and pays in full a preference dividenddividend; and (2) the date on or by which all the preference shares are redeemed in full or purchased by Barclays Bank PLC.

Holders of the preference shares are not entitled to receive notice of, or to attend, or vote at, any general meeting of Barclays Bank PLC. Barclays Bank PLC is not permitted to create a class of shares ranking as regards participation in the profits or assets of Barclays Bank PLC in priority to the preference shares, save with the sanction of a special resolution of a separate general meeting of the holders of the preference shares (requiring a majority of not less than three-fourths of the holders of the preference shares voting at the separate general meeting), or with the consent in writing of the holders of three-fourths of the preference shares.

Except as described above, the holders of the preference shares have no right to participate in the surplus assets of Barclays Bank PLC.

 

259296 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Barclays Bank PLC dataLOGO

Notes to the accountsl Reserves

 

j Reserves

Other reserves

Other reserves

      
  Available
for sale
reserve
£m
 Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£m
 

Translation
reserve

£m

 Total
£m
   Available
for sale
reserve
£m
 Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£m
  

Translation
reserve

£m

 Total
£m
 

At 1st January 2007

  184  (230) (438) (484)

Net gains from changes in fair value

  385  182    567 

At 1st January 2008

  111  26  (307) (170)

Net (losses)/gains from changes in fair value

  (1,752) 252    (1,500)

Net (gains)/losses transferred to net profit

  (560) 198    (362)  (212) 19    (193)

Currency translation differences

      29  29       2,307  2,307 

Losses transferred to net profit due to impairment

  13      13   382      382 

Changes in insurance liabilities

  22      22   17      17 

Net losses transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  68      68 

Net gains transferred to net profit due to fair value hedging

  (2)     (2)

Tax

  (1) (124) 102  (23)  207  (165)  840  882 

At 31st December 2007

  111  26  (307) (170)

At 31st December 2008

  (1,249)  132  2,840  1,723 

 

Retained earnings

    
    Retained
earnings
£m
 

At 1st January 20072008

  11,55614,222 

Profit attributable to equity holders

  4,7494,846 

Equity-settled share schemes

  567463 

Tax on equity-settled shares schemes

  28(4)

Other taxes

(52)

Vesting of Barclays PLC shares under share-based payment schemes

  (524437)

Dividends paid

  (3,2871,160)

Dividends on preference shares and other shareholders’ equity

  (345502)

Capital injection from Barclays PLC

  1,4345,137 

Other movements

  44(56) 

At 31st December 20072008

  14,22222,457 

At 1st January 20062007

  8,46211,556 

Profit attributable to equity holders

  4,9144,749 

Equity-settled share schemes

  663567 

Tax on equity-settled shares schemes

  9628 

Vesting of Barclays PLC shares under share-based payment schemes

  (394524)

Dividends paid

  (1,9643,287)

Dividends on preference shares and other shareholders’ equity

  (329345)

Capital injection from Barclays PLC

1,434

Other movements

  10844 

At 31st December 20062007

  11,55614,222 

Transfers from the cashflowcash flow hedging reserve to the income statement were: interest income £93m£4m loss (2006: £7m(2007: £93m loss), interest expense £74m loss (2007: £11m gain (2006: £73m gain), net trading income £119m gain (2007: £100m loss (2006: £15m loss) and administration and general expenses of £60m loss (2007: £16m loss (2006: £nil)loss).

km Other shareholders’ equity

 

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

At 1st January

  2,534  2,490  2,687  2,534

Appropriations

  8  44  23  8

Other movements

  145    (146)  145

At 31st December

  2,687  2,534  2,564  2,687

Included in other shareholders’ equity are:

Issuances of reserve capital instruments which bear a fixed rate of interest ranging between 7.375%-8.55% until 2010 or 2011. After these dates, in the event that the reserve capital instruments are not redeemed, they will bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London or European interbank rates. These instruments are repayable, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any coupon payment date falling in or after June or December 2010 or 2011. The Bank may elect to defer any payment of interest on the reserve capital instruments for any period of time. Whilst such deferral is continuing, neither the Bank nor Barclays PLC may declare or pay a dividend, subject to certain exceptions, on any of its ordinary shares or preference shares.

Issuance of capital notes which bear interest at rates fixed periodically in advance, based on London interbank rates. These notes are repayable in each case, at the option of the Bank, in whole on any interest payment date. The Bank is not obliged to make a payment of interest on its capital notes if, in the preceding six months, a dividend has not been declared or paid on any class of shares of Barclays PLC.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 260
 297


LOGOBarclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accounts

n Minority interests

 

    2008
£m
  2007
£m
 

At beginning of year

  1,949  1,685 

Share of profit after tax

  403  377 

Dividend and other payments

  (134) (131)

Equity issued by subsidiaries

  4  137 

Available for sale reserve: net (loss)/gain from changes in fair value

  (1) 1 

Cash flow hedges: net gain/(loss) from changes in fair value

  76  (16)

Currency translation differences

  59  16 

Additions

    27 

Disposals

  (11) (111)

Other

  27  (36)

At end of year

  2,372  1,949 

l Minority interestso Dividends

 

    2007
£m
  2006
£m
 

 

At beginning of year

  1,685  1,578 

Share of profit after tax

  377  342 

Dividend and other payments

  (131) (127)

Equity issued by subsidiaries

  137  233 

Available for sale reserve: net gain/(loss) from changes in fair value

  1  (2)

Cash flow hedges: net loss from changes in fair value

  (16) (9)

Currency translation differences

  16  (316)

Additions

  27  20 

Disposals

  (111) (34)

Other

  (36)  

At end of year

 

  1,949  1,685 

m Dividends

  2007
£m
  2006
£m
  2008
£m
  2007
£m

On ordinary shares

        

Final dividend

  791  730  1,030  791

Interim dividends

  2,496  1,234  130  2,496

Dividends

  3,287  1,964  1,160  3,287

These dividends are paid to enable Barclays PLC to fund its dividends to its shareholders and in 2007, to fund the repurchase by Barclays PLC of ordinary share capital.

Dividends paid on preference shares amounted to £193m (2006: £174m)£390m (2007: £193m). Dividends paid on other equity instruments as detailed in Note km amounted to £152m (2006: £151m)£112m (2007: £152m).

np Financial risks

The only significant financial instruments that are held by Barclays Bank PLC and not Barclays PLC are investments in Barclays PLC ordinary shares, dealt with as trading portfolio equity assets, debt securities and available for sale financial investments as appropriate.

There consequently are no significant differences in exposures to market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and the fair value of financial instruments between Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC, and no differences in the manner in which these financial risks are managed. Therefore the disclosures regarding financial risks appearing in Notes 4546 to 4849 are in all material respects the same for Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays PLC.

oq Capital

The Barclays Bank PLC Group’s policies and objectives for managing capital are the same as those for the Barclays PLC Group, disclosed in Note 50.52.

The table below provides details under Basel I of the Barclays Bank PLC Group capital ratios and risk weighted assets at 31st December 2007 and 2006.

    

2007

%

  

2006

%

Capital Ratios

    

Tier 1 ratio

  7.5  7.5

Risk asset ratio

 

  11.8  11.5
    

2007

£m

  

2006

£m

Total risk weighted assets

 

  353,471  297,833

The table below provides details of the regulatory capital resources of Barclays Bank PLC Group.Group at 31st December 2008 and 2007.

 

  2007
£m
 2006
£m
 
  2008
Basel II
£m
 2007
Basel I
£m
 

Total qualifying Tier 1 capital

  26,534  22,455   37,101  26,534 

Total qualifying Tier 2 capital

  17,123  14,036   22,356  17,123 

Total deductions

  (1,889) (2,330)  (964) (1,889)

Total net capital resources

  41,768  34,161   58,493  41,768 

r Segmental reporting

Segmental reporting by Barclays Bank PLC is the same as that presented in Note 53 to the Barclays PLC financial statements, except for:

the difference in profit before tax of £42m (2007: £31m) between Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC is included in Head office functions and other operations.

the difference in total assets of £49m (2007: £222m) is represented by holdings of Barclays PLC shares held by the businesses.

 

261298 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC data

Notes to the accountsFinancial Data

 

p Segmental analysis

Year ended 31st December 2007

  United
Kingdom
£m
 
 
 
 Other
European
Union

£m

 
 
 

 

 United
States
£m
  Africa
£m
 
 
 Rest of
the World
£m
  Total

£m

 

 

Total income

 

  13,310  3,600  2,209  3,302  1,102  23,523 

Insurance claims and benefits

 

  (152) (226)   (114)   (492)

Total income net of insurance claims

 

  13,158  3,374  2,209  3,188  1,102  23,031 

Percentage of total income net of insurance claims (%)

 

  57%  15%  9%  14%  5%  100% 

Total assets (by location of asset)

 

  429,665  285,719  301,973  56,117  154,109  1,227,583 

Percentage of total assets (%)

 

  35%  23%  25%  4%  13%  100% 

Capital expenditure (by location of asset)a

 

  

 

894

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

789

  

 

225

 

 

 

88

  

 

2,299

 

Year ended 31st December 2006

  United
Kingdom
£m
 
 
 
 Other
European
Union

£m

 
 
 

 

 United
States

£m

  Africa
£m
 
 
 Rest of
the World
£m
  Total

£m

 

 

Total income

 

  12,503  3,063  2,840  2,897  928  22,231 

Insurance claims and benefits

 

  (288) (181)   (106)   (575)

Total income net of insurance claims

 

  12,215  2,882  2,840  2,791  928  21,656 

Percentage of total income net of insurance claims (%)

 

  57%  13%  13%  13%  4%  100% 

Total assets (by location of asset)

 

  406,044  203,929  229,779  44,696  112,055  996,503 

Percentage of total assets (%)

 

  41%  20%  23%  5%  11%  100% 

Capital expenditure (by location of asset)a

 

  569  62  565  136  39  1,371 

Note

aCapital expenditure comprises purchased goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired during the year.

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

262


LOGO

Barclays Bank PLC

Financial Data

   IFRS     

Selected financial statistics

  2007

%

 

 

 2006

%

 

 

 2005

%

 

 

 2004a

%

 

 

Attributable profit as a percentage of:

     

– average total assets

  0.4  0.4  0.4  0.5 

– average shareholders’ equity

  16.3  20.2  17.4  21.3 

Average shareholders’ equity as a percentage of average total assets

 

  2.2  2.2  2.2  2.4 

Selected income statement data

 

  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Interest income

  25,308  21,805  17,232  13,880 

Interest expense

  (15,707) (12,662) (9,157) (7,047)

Non-interest income

  13,922  13,088  9,934  8,543 

Operating expenses

  (13,199) (12,674) (10,527) (8,536)

Provisions – bad and doubtful debts

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a 

– contingent liabilities and commitments

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a 

Impairment charges

  (2,795) (2,154) (1,571) (1,093)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  42  46  45  56 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  28  323    45 

Exceptional items

  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a 

Profit before tax

  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589 

Attributable profit

 

  4,749  4,914  3,695  3,263 

Selected balance sheet data

 

  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Total shareholders’ equity

  31,821  27,106  24,243  16,849 

Subordinated liabilities

  18,150  13,786  12,463  12,277 

Deposits from banks, customer accounts and debt securities in issue

  506,623  447,453  417,139  412,358 

Loans and advances to banks and customers

  385,518  313,226  300,001  343,041 

Total assets

 

  1,227,583  996,503  924,170  538,300 

         IFRS       
Selected financial statistics  

2008

%

  

2007

%

  

2006

%

  

2005

%

  

2004a

%

 

Attributable profit as a percentage of:

      

– average total assets

  0.3  0.4  0.4  0.4  0.5 

– average shareholders’ equity

  13.8  16.3  20.2  17.4  21.3 

Average shareholders’ equity as a percentage of average total assets

 

  2.0  2.2  2.2  2.2  2.4 

Selected income statement data

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

 

Interest income

  28,010  25,308  21,805  17,232  13,880 

Interest expense

  (16,595) (15,707) (12,662) (9,157) (7,047)

Non-interest income

  11,891  13,922  13,088  9,934  8,543 

Operating expenses

  (14,362) (13,199) (12,674) (10,527) (8,536)

Impairment charges

  (5,419) (2,795) (2,154) (1,571) (1,093)

Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures

  14  42  46  45  56 

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

  327  28  323    45 

Gains on acquisitions

  2,406         

Profit before tax

  6,035  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589 

Attributable profit

 

  4,846  4,749  4,914  3,695  3,263 

Selected balance sheet data

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

  

£m

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  43,574  31,821  27,106  24,243  16,849 

Subordinated liabilities

  29,842  18,150  13,786  12,463  12,277 

Deposits from banks, customer accounts and debt securities in issue

  603,869  506,623  447,453  417,139  412,358 

Loans and advances to banks and customers

  509,522  385,518  313,226  300,001  343,041 

Total assets

 

  2,053,029  1,227,583  996,503  924,170  538,300 

Note

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

263 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 299


Barclays Bank PLC data

Financial Data

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges – Barclays Bank PLC

 

  2007  2006  2005  2004a  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004a 
  (in £m except for ratios)   (in £m except for ratios) 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

           

IFRS:

Fixed charges

     

IFRS/UK GAAP:

      

Fixed charges

      

Interest expense

  37,903  30,385  20,965  14,464   38,235  37,903  30,385  20,965  14,464 

Rental expense

  161  137  126  93   240  161  137  126  93 

Total fixed charges

  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557   38,475  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557 

Earnings

           

Income before taxes and minority interests

  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589   6,035  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589 

Less: Unremitted pre-tax income of associated companies and joint ventures

  (45) (41) (28) (51)  (19) (45) (41) (28) (51)
  7,062  7,156  5,283  4,538   6,016  7,062  7,156  5,283  4,538 

Fixed charges

  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557   38,475  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557 

Total earnings including fixed charges

  45,126  37,678  26,374  19,095   44,491  45,126  37,678  26,374  19,095 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

  1.19  1.23  1.25  1.31   1.16  1.19  1.23  1.25  1.31 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preference shares – Barclays Bank PLC

 

  2007  2006  2005  2004a
   (in £m except for ratios) 

Combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and similar appropriations

     

IFRS:

     

Interest expense

  37,903  30,385  20,965  14,464 

Rental expense

 

  161  137  126  93 

Fixed charges

  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557 

Preference share dividends and similar appropriations

 

  345  395  304  3 

Total fixed charges

 

  38,409  30,917  21,395  14,560 

Earnings

     

Income before taxes and minority interests

  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589 

Less: Unremitted pre-tax (income)/loss of associated companies and joint ventures

 

  (45) (41) (28) (51)
  7,062  7,156  5,283  4,538 

Fixed charges

 

  38,409  30,917  21,091  14,557 

Total earnings including fixed charges

 

  45,471  38,073  26,374  19,095 

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and similar appropriations

 

  1.18  1.23  1.23  1.31 

    2008  2007  2006  2005  2004a 
   (in £m except for ratios) 

Combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and similar appropriations

      

IFRS/UK GAAP:

      

Interest expense

  38,235  37,903  30,385  20,965  14,464 

Rental expense

 

  240  161  137  126  93 

Fixed charges

  38,475  38,064  30,522  21,091  14,557 

Preference share dividends and similar appropriations

 

  583  345  395  304  3 

Total fixed charges

 

  39,058  38,409  30,917  21,395  14,560 

Earnings

      

Income before taxes and minority interests

  6,035  7,107  7,197  5,311  4,589 

Less: Unremitted pre-tax income of associated companies and joint ventures

 

  (19) (45) (41) (28) (51)
  6,016  7,062  7,156  5,283  4,538 

Fixed charges

 

  39,058  38,409  30,917  21,091  14,557 

Total earnings including fixed charges

 

  45,074  45,471  38,073  26,374  19,095 

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and similar appropriations

 

  1.15  1.18  1.23  1.23  1.31 

NotesNote

aDoes not reflect the application of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 which became effective from 1st January 2005.

 

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

264


SEC FORM 20-F Other Information

Currency of presentation

In this report, unless otherwise specified, all amounts are expressed in Pounds Sterling. For the months indicated, the high and low noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in Pounds Sterling, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the noon buying rate), were:

  (US Dollars per Pound Sterling)
  February  January  December  November  October  September
      2008        2007   

High

  1.9923  1.9895  2.0658  2.1104  2.0777  2.0389

Low

  1.9404  1.9515  1.9774  2.0478  2.0279  1.992

For the years indicated, the average of the noon buying rates on the last day of each month were:

  (US Dollars per Pound Sterling)
   2007  2006  2005  2004  2003

Average

  2.00  1.86  1.81  1.84  1.64

On March 18, 2008, the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Pound Sterling was $2.0216.

No representation is made that Pounds Sterling amounts have been, or could have been, or could be, converted into US Dollars at any of the above rates. For the purpose of presenting financial information in this report, exchange rates other than those shown above may have been used.

265300 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


LOGO

Glossary

Term used in Annual Report

US equivalent or brief description
AccountsFinancial statements
AllottedIssued
Attributable profitNet income
Called up share capitalOrdinary shares, issued and fully paid
Capital allowancesTax term equivalent to US tax depreciation allowances
Cash at bank and in handCash
Class of businessIndustry segment
Finance leaseCapital lease
FreeholdOwnership with absolute rights in perpetuity
Loans and advancesLendings
Loan capitalLong-term debt
Net asset valueBook value
ProfitIncome
Share capitalOrdinary shares, capital stock or common stock issued and fully paid
Share premium accountAdditional paid-up capital or paid-in surplus (not distributable)
Shares in issueShares outstanding
Write-offsCharge-offs

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

266


Shareholder information

Dividends on the ordinary shares of Barclays PLC

Barclays PLC has paid dividends on its ordinary shares every year without interruption since its incorporation in 1896.

As announced on 13th October 2008, in the light of the new capital ratios agreed with the FSA and in recognition of the need to maximise capital resources in the current economic climate, the Board has concluded that it would not be appropriate to pay a final dividend for 2008. The Board intends to resume dividend payments in the second half of 2009, at which time it is intended to pay dividends quarterly.

The dividends declared for each of the last five years were:

Pence per 25p ordinary share

   2007  2006  2005  2004  2003

 

Interim

  11.50  10.50  9.20  8.25  7.05

Final

 

  22.50  20.50  17.40  15.75  13.45

Total

 

  34.00  31.00  26.60  24.00  20.50

US Dollars per 25p ordinary share

          
   2007  2006  2005  2004  2003

Interim

  0.23  0.20  0.16  0.15  0.12

Final

 

  0.45  0.41  0.31  0.30  0.24

Total

 

  0.68  0.61  0.47  0.45  0.36

The gross dividends applicable to an American Depositary Share (ADS) representing four ordinary shares, before deduction of withholding tax, are as follows:

US Dollars per American Depositary Share

          

Pence per 25p ordinary share

               
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003

Interim

  0.93  0.80  0.65  0.60  0.48  11.50  11.50  10.50  9.20  8.25

Final

  1.79  1.64  1.24  1.20  0.95    22.50  20.50  17.40  15.75

Total

  2.72  2.44  1.89  1.80  1.43  11.50  34.00  31.00  26.60  24.00
          
          

US Dollars per 25p ordinary share

               
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004

Interim

  0.20  0.23  0.20  0.16  0.15

Final

    0.45  0.41  0.31  0.30

Total

  0.20  0.68  0.61  0.47  0.45
The gross dividends applicable to an American Depositary Share (ADS) representing four ordinary shares, before deduction of withholding tax, are as follows:The gross dividends applicable to an American Depositary Share (ADS) representing four ordinary shares, before deduction of withholding tax, are as follows:
          
          

US Dollars per American Depositary Share

               
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004

Interim

  0.82  0.93  0.80  0.65  0.60

Final

    1.78  1.64  1.24  1.20

Total

  0.82  2.71  2.44  1.89  1.80

Dividends expressed in Dollars are translated at the Noon Buying Rates in New York City for cable transfers in Pounds Sterling as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the ‘Noon Buying Rate’) for the days on which dividends are paid, except for the 2007 final dividend, payable in the UK on 25th April 2008, which is translated at the Noon Buying Rate applicable on 27th February 2008.paid. No representation is made that Pounds Sterling amounts have been, or could have been, or could be, converted into Dollars at these rates.

Trading market for ordinary shares of Barclays PLC

The nominal capital of Barclays PLC is divided into 9,996,000,00013,996,000,000 ordinary shares of 25p each (ordinary shares) 0.4 million Sterling preference shares of £100 each, 0.4 million US Dollar preference shares of $100 each, 150 million US Dollar preference shares of $0.25 each, 0.4 million Euro preference shares of100 each, 0.4 million Yen preference shares of ¥10,000 each and 1,000,0001 million staff shares of £1 each (staff shares).each. At the close of business on 31st December 2007, 6,600,181,8012008, 8,371,830,617 ordinary shares and 875,000 staff shares were outstanding.

The principal trading market for Barclays PLC ordinary shares is the London Stock Exchange. Ordinary share listings were also obtained on the Tokyo Stock Exchange with effect from 1st August 1986 and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) with effect from 9th September 1986. During the year, the Company de-listed from the Tokyo Stock Exchange with effect from 28th June 2008.

Trading on the NYSE is in the form of ADSs under the symbol ‘BCS’. Each ADS represents four ordinary shares and is evidenced by an American Depositary Receipt (ADR). The ADR depositary is TheJ P Morgan Chase Bank, of New York.N.A. Details of trading activity are published in the stock tables of leading daily newspapers in the US.

There were 838926 ADR holders and 1,4341,528 recorded holders of ordinary shares with US addresses at 31st December 2007,2008, whose shareholdings represented approximately 3.94%4.22% of total outstanding ordinary shares on that date. Since certain of the ordinary shares and ADRs were held by brokers or other nominees, the number of recorded holders in the US may not be representative of the number of beneficial holders or of their country of residence.

 

302

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

267


LOGO

LOGO

The following table shows the high and low sales price for the ordinary shares during the periods indicated, based on mid-market prices at close of business on the London Stock Exchange and the high and low sale price for ADSs as reported on the NYSE composite tape.

 

  25p ordinary shares  American

Depositary Shares

  25p ordinary shares  American
Depositary Shares
  High

p

  Low

p

  High
US$
  Low
US$
  

High

p

  

Low

p

  High
US$
  Low
US$

2008

        

2009

        

By month:

                

January

  508.5  420.75  41.37  33.75  184.6  51.2  10.97  3.07

February

  520.0  427.5  41.58  33.23  116.2  92.3  6.99  5.32

2007

        

2008

        

By month:

                

July

  738.5  681.0  60.35  54.93  356.5  260.5  28.2  20.76

August

  712.5  589.0  57.75  46.61  379.5  311.0  29.52  23.62

September

  639.0  580.0  51.47  47.10  389.0  301.0  32.5  21.48

October

  665.5  580.0  54.48  47.30  368.0  178.9  25.9  10.73

November

  571.5  474.5  47.23  39.86  195.9  127.7  12.68  7.37

December

  569.0  499.0  46.90  39.90  162.0  138.2  9.81  8.45

By quarter:

                

First quarter

  790.0  673.5  62.46  53.35  506.42  382.25  41.39  32.27

Second quarter

  756.0  696.0  60.37  55.79  490.83  291.5  39.89  23.15

Third quarter

  738.5  580.0  60.35  46.61  389.0  260.5  32.5  20.76

Fourth quarter

  665.5  474.5  54.48  39.86  368.0  127.7  25.9  7.37

2006

        

2007

        

First quarter

  790.0  673.5  62.46  53.35

Second quarter

  756.0  696.0  60.37  55.79

Third quarter

  738.5  580.0  60.35  46.61

Fourth quarter

  737  676  61.52  51.02  665.5  474.5  54.48  39.86

Third quarter

  680  586  51.75  42.90

Second quarter

  701  588  51.03  43.20

First quarter

  684  587.5  48.00  41.80

2008

  506.42  127.7  41.39  7.37

2007

  790  474.5  62.46  39.86  790.0  474.5  62.46  39.86

2006

  737  586  61.52  41.80  737.0  586.0  61.52  41.80

2005

  615  520  47.00  37.16  615.0  520.0  47.0  37.16

2004

  586  443  45.99  32.78  586.0  443.0  45.99  32.78

2003

  527  311  36.57  20.30  527.0  311.0  36.57  20.30

This section incorporates information on the prices at which securities of Barclays PLC have traded. It is emphasised that past performance cannot be relied upon as a guide to future performance.

 

Shareholdings at 31st December 2007a        
  Shareholders  

Shares
held as a
percentage
of issued
ordinary
shares

Shareholdings at 31st December 2008a

            
  Number  Percentage
of total
holders
  Number of
shares held
(millions)
  

Shares
held as a
percentage
of issued
ordinary
shares

  Number of
shareholders
  Percentage
of holders
  Shares held
(millions)
  Percentage
of capital

Classification of shareholders

                

Personal holders

  724,760  97.3  462.0  7.0  732,093  97.10  750.24  8.97

Banks and nominees

  18,232  2.45  5,993.6  90.8  20,516  2.72  6,522.72  77.90

Other companies

  1,810  0.25  144.19  2.18  1,758  0.18  1,098.84  13.13

Insurance companies

  14  0.0  0.2  0.02  13  0.00  0.00  0.00

Pensions funds

  16  0.0  0.019  0.0  23  0.00  0.00  0.00

Totals

  744,832  100  6,600  100  754,403  100  8,371.8  100

Shareholding range

                

1-100

  28,398  3.81  0.69  0.01  30,074  4.02  1.27  0.02

101-250

  273,942  36.78  19.8  0.3  232,523  30.8  48.9  0.58

251-500

  212,358  28.51  28.3  0.43  240,892  31.9  82.3  0.98

501-1,000

  108,967  14.63  36.9  0.56  117,044  15.5  82.2  0.98

1,001-5,000

  92,200  12.38  134.5  2.01  102,416  13.6  210.1  2.51

5,001-10,000

  15,350  2.06  89.7  1.36  16,943  2.25  119.71  1.43

10,001-25,000

  9,253  1.24  119.5  1.81  10,083  1.34  152.72  1.82

25,001-50,000

  2,231  0.30  67.0  1.02  2,318  0.31  79.4  0.96

50,001 and over

  2,133  0.29  6,104  92.5  2,110  0.28  7,595.2  90.72

Totals

  

 

744,832

  

 

100

  

 

6,600

  

 

100

  754,403  100  8,371.8  100

United States holdings

  1,434  0.16  2.27  0.034  1,528  0.2  3.23  0.04

Note

aThese figures include Barclays Sharestore members.

 

268 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 303


SEC FORM 20-F Other Information

Currency of presentation

In this report, unless otherwise specified, all amounts are expressed in Pounds Sterling. For the months of September through December 2008, the high and low noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in Pounds Sterling, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (noon buying rate), were as set out in the table below.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discontinued the publication of noon buying rates. For January and February 2009, the closing spot rates for Pounds Sterling as determined by Bloomberg at 5:00 p.m. (New York time) (the “Closing Spot Rate”), expressed in US Dollars per Pound Sterling were as set out in the table below.

   (US Dollars per Pound Sterling)
   February  January  December  November  October  September
        2009          2008    

High

  1.49  1.52  1.55  1.62  1.78  1.86

Low

  1.42  1.38  1.44  1.48  1.55  1.75

For the years indicated, the averages of the noon buying rates on the last day of each month were:

   (US Dollars per Pound Sterling)

Average

  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004
   1.84  2.0  1.86  1.81  1.64

On March 20, 2009, the Closing Spot Rate in Pound Sterling was $1.45.

No representation is made that Pounds Sterling amounts have been, or could have been, or could be, converted into US Dollars at any of the above rates. For the purpose of presenting financial information in this report, exchange rates other than those shown above may have been used.

304

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Shareholder information

 

Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Company was incorporated in England on 20th July 1896 under the Companies Acts 1862 to 1890 as a company limited by shares and was reregistered in 1982 as a public limited company under the Companies Acts 1948 to 1980. The Company is registered under company number 48839. The Company was reregistered as Barclays PLC on 1st January 1985.

The objects of the Company are set out in full in clause 4 of its Memorandum of Association which provides, among other things, that the Company’s objects are to carry on business as an investment and holding company and the business of banking in all its aspects.

The Company may, by special resolution, amend its Articles of Association. The Company is proposing to adopt new Articles of Association at its annual general meeting in 2008, to update its Articles of Association for the operative provisions of the Companies Act 2006. A summary of the proposed changes may be found in the notice of annual general meeting that accompanies this report.

Directors

(i) The minimum number of Directors (excluding alternate Directors) is five. There is no maximum limit. There is no age limit for Directors.

(ii) Excluding executive remuneration and any other entitlement to remuneration for extra services (including service on board committees) under the Articles, a Director is entitled to a fee at a rate determined by the Board but the aggregate fees paid to all Directors shall not exceed £1,000,000 per annum or such higher amount as may be approved by an ordinary resolution of the Company. Each Director is entitled to reimbursement for all travelling, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by him/her in or about the performance of his/her duties.

(iii) No auditorDirector may act (either himself/herself or member of a firm of auditorsthrough his/her firm) as an auditor of the Group of companies may be appointed a Director.Company. A Director may hold any other office of the Company on such terms as the Board shall determine.

(iv) At each annual general meeting (‘AGM’) of the Company, one third of the Directors (rounded down) are required to retire from office by rotation and may offer themselves for re-election. The Directors so retiring are those who have been longest in office (and in the case of equality of service length are selected by lot). Other than a retiring Director, no person shall (unless recommended by the Board) be eligible for election unless a member notifies the Company Secretary in advance of his/her intention to propose a person for election.

(v) The Board has the power to appoint additional Directors or to fill a casual vacancy amongst the Directors. Any Director so appointed holds office until the next AGM, when he/she may offer himself/herself for re-election. He/she is not taken into account in determining the number of Directors retiring by rotation.

(vi) The Board may appoint any Director to any executive position or employment in the Company on such terms as they determine.

(vii) A Director may appoint either another Director or some other person approved by the Board to act as his/her alternate with power to attend Board meetings and generally to exercise the functions of the appointing Director in his/her absence (other than the power to appoint an alternate).

(viii) From 1st October 2008, the Board may authorise any matter in relation to which a Director has, or can have, a direct interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict with, the Company’s interests. Only Directors who have no interest in the matter being considered will be able to authorise the relevant matter and they may impose limits or conditions when giving authorisation if they think this is appropriate.

(ix) A Director may hold positions with or be interested in other companies and, subject to legislation applicable to the Company and the FSA’s requirements, may contract with the Company or any other company in which the Company is interested. A Director may not vote or count towards the quorum on any resolution concerning any proposal in which he/she (or any person connected with him/her) has a material interest (other than by virtue of his/her interest in securities of the

Company) or if he/she has a duty which conflicts or may conflict with the interests of the Company, unless the resolution relates to any proposal:

 

(a)to indemnify a Director or provide him/her with a guarantee or security in respect of money lent by him/her to, or any obligation incurred by him/her or any other person for the benefit of (or at the request of), the Company (or any other member of the Group);

 

(b)to indemnify or give security or a guarantee to a third party in respect of a debt or obligation of the Company (or any other member of the Group) for which the Director has personally assumed responsibility;

(c)to indemnify a Director or provide him/her with a guarantee or security for any liability which he/she may incur in the performance of his/her duties or to obtain insurance against such a liability;for the benefit of Directors;

 

(d)involving the acquisition by a Director of any securities of the Company pursuant to an offer to existing holders of securities or to the public;

 

(e)that the Director underwrite any issue of securities of the Company (or any of its subsidiaries);

 

(f)concerning any other company in which the Director is interested as an officer or creditor or shareholder but, broadly, only if he/she (together with his/her connected persons) is directly or indirectly interested in less than 1% of either any class of the issued equity share capital or of the voting rights of that company; and

 

(g)concerning any superannuation fund or retirement, death or disability benefits scheme under which a Director may benefit or any employees’ share scheme, so long as any such fund or scheme does not give additional advantages to the Director which are not granted to the employees who are in the fund or scheme; and

(h)concerning any other arrangement for the benefit of employees of the Company (or any other member of the Group) under which the Director benefits or stands to benefit in a similar manner to the employees concerned and which does not give the Director any advantage which the employees to whom the arrangement relates would not receive.

(ix)(x) A Director may not vote or be counted in the quorum on any resolution which concerns his/her own employment or appointment to any office of the Company or any other company in which the Company is interested.

(x)(xi) Subject to applicable legislation, the provisions described in sub-paragraphs (viii)(ix) and (ix)(x) may be relaxed or suspended by an ordinary resolution of the Company.members of the Company or any applicable governmental or other regulatory body.

(xi)(xii) A Director is required to hold an interest in ordinary shares having a nominal value of at least £500, which currently equates to 2,000 Ordinary Shares.Shares unless restricted from acquiring or holding such interest by any applicable law or regulation or any applicable governmental or other regulatory body. A Director may act before acquiring those Ordinary Sharesshares but must acquire the qualification Ordinary Sharesshares within two months from his or his/her appointment. Where a Director is unable to acquire the requisite number of Ordinary Sharesshares within that time owing to legislative, regulatorylaw, regulation or share-dealing restrictions,requirement of any governmental or other relevant authority, he/she must acquire the Ordinary Sharesshares as soon as reasonably practicable once the restriction(s) end.

(xii)(xiii) The Board may exercise all of the powers of the Company to borrow money, to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled capital and to issue debentures and other securities.

Classes of share

The Company only has two classes of shares, Ordinary Shares in issue. However, the Company has authorised but unissued preference shares of £100, $100, $0.25,100 and Staff Shares,¥10,000 each (together, the ‘Preference Shares’) which may (pursuant to whicha resolution passed by the shareholders of the Company at the AGM) be issued by the Board from time to time in one or more series with such rights and subject to such restrictions and limitations as the Board may determine. The Company also has authorised but unissued staff shares of £1 each. The Articles of Association contain provisions set out below apply:to the following effect:

(i) Dividends

Subject to the provisions of the Articles and applicable legislation, the Company in general meetingGeneral Meeting may declare dividends on the Ordinary Shares by ordinary resolution, but such dividend may not exceed the amount recommended by the Board. The Board may also pay interim or final dividends if it appears they are justified by the Company’s financial position.

Each Preference Share confers the right to a non-cumulative preferential dividend (‘Preference Dividend’) payable in such currency at such rates (whether fixed or calculated by reference to or in accordance with a specified procedure or mechanism), on such dates and on such other terms as may be determined by the Board prior to allotment thereof.

The Preference Shares rank in regard to payment of dividend in priority to the holders of Ordinary Shares and any other class of shares in the Company ranking junior to the Preference Shares.

Dividends may be paid on the Preference Shares if, in the opinion of the Board, the Company has sufficient distributable profits, after payment in full or the setting aside of a sum to provide for all dividends payable on (or in the case of shares carrying a cumulative right to dividends, before) the relevant dividend payment date on any class of shares in the Company rankingpari passuwith or in priority to the relevant series of Preference Shares as regards participation in the profits of the Company.

If the Board considers that the distributable profits of the Company available for distribution are insufficient to cover the payment in full of Preference Dividends, Preference Dividends shall be paid to the extent of the distributable profits on apro ratabasis.


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

305


LOGO

Notwithstanding the above, the Board may, at its absolute discretion, determine that any Preference Dividend which are resolved towould otherwise be distributedpayable may either not be payable at all or only payable in part.

If any Preference Dividend on a series of Preference Shares is not paid, or is only paid in part, for the reasons described above, holders of Preference Shares will not have a claim in respect of such nonpayment.

If any period are applied firstdividend on a series of Preference Shares is not paid in payment of a fixed dividend of 20% per annumfull on the Staffrelevant dividend payment date, a dividend restriction shall apply. The dividend restriction means that, subject to certain exceptions, neither the Company nor Barclays Bank may (a) pay a dividend on, or (b) redeem, purchase, reduce or otherwise acquire, any of their respective ordinary shares, other preference shares or other share capital ranking equal or junior to the relevant series of Preference Shares and thenuntil the earlier of such time as the Company next pays in payment of dividendsfull a dividend on the Ordinary Shares. No dividend will be declaredrelevant series of Preference Shares or the date on which all of the Staffrelevant series of Preference Shares unless a dividend is also paid on the Ordinary Shares in respect of that period. Any Staff Share held by anyone not an employee of Barclays or Barclays Bank (an ‘Employee’) will be treated as a Ordinary Share in respect of dividends, up to a maximum dividend of 6% for the year upon the amount paid up on that share.are redeemed.

All unclaimed dividends payable in respect of aany share may be invested or otherwise made use of by the Board for the benefit of the Company until claimed. If a dividend is not claimed after 12 years of it becoming payable, it is forfeited and reverts to the Company.

The Board may (although it currently does not), with the approval of an ordinary resolution of the Company, offer shareholders the right to choose to receive an allotment of additional fully paid Ordinary Shares instead of cash in respect of all or part of any dividend.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

269


LOGO

(ii) Voting

Every member who is present in person or by proxy, or represented at any general meeting of the Company and who is entitled to vote has one vote on a show of hands. On a poll, every member who is present or represented has one vote for every share held. Any joint holder may vote in respect of jointly owned shares, but the vote of the senior holder (as determined by order in the share register) shall take precedence. If any sum payable remains unpaid in relation to a member’s shareholding, that member is not entitled to vote that share or exercise any other right in relation to a meeting of the Company unless the Board otherwise determine.

If any member, or any other person appearing to be interested in any of the Company’s Ordinary Shares, is served with a notice under Section 793 of the Companies Act 2006 and does not supply the Company with the information required in the notice, then the Board, in its absolute discretion, may direct that that member shall not be entitled to attend or vote at any meeting of the Company.

The Board may further direct that if the shares of the defaulting member represent 0.25% or more of the issued shares of the relevant class, that dividends or other monies payable on those shares shall be retained by the Company until the direction ceases to have effect and that no transfer of those shares shall be registered (other than certain specified ‘approved transfers’). A direction ceases to have effect seven days after the Company has received the information requested, or when the Company is notified that an ‘approved transfer’ to a third party has occurred, or as the Board otherwise determines.

(iii) Transfers

Ordinary Shares may be held in either certificated or uncertificated form. Certificated sharesOrdinary Shares shall be transferred in writing in any usual or other form approved by the Board and executed by or on behalf of the transferor. Transfers of uncertificated sharesOrdinary Shares shall be made in accordance with the applicable regulations. The Board may make any arrangements to regulate and evidence the transfer of sharesOrdinary Shares as they consider fit in accordance with applicable legislation and the rules of the FSA.

In order to transfer a Staff Share, the transferor must serve a notice on the Company (a ‘Transfer Notice’) indicating his/her wish to transfer such share at such sum as he/she specifies as the fair value (subject to a maximum amount determined in accordance with the Articles). The Staff Shares must be transferred at the specified fair value to such Employee as is willing to purchase it and who has been identified by the Board within 60 days of the Transfer Notice. If the Company has not found a person willing to purchase the share within 60 days of the Transfer Notice, the Staff Share may be freely transferred at any price (although the Board may decline to prepare or register the transfer). Such a procedure may also be initiated by the Board if a Staff Share is held by a non-Employee.

Registration of sharesOrdinary Shares may be suspended, subject to applicable legislation, for such periods as the Board may determine (but for not more than 30 days in any calendar year).

The Board is not bound to register a transfer of partly paid shares,Ordinary Shares, or fully paid shares in exceptional circumstances approved by the FSA. The Board may also decline to register an instrument of transfer of certificated sharesOrdinary Shares unless it is duly stamped and deposited at the prescribed place and accompanied by the share certificate(s) and such other evidence as reasonably required by the Board to evidence right to transfer, it is in respect of one class of shares only, and it is in favour of not more than four transferees (except in the case of executors or trustees of a member).

Preference Shares may be represented by share warrants to bearer or be in registered form.

Preference Shares represented by share warrants to bearer are transferred by delivery of the relevant warrant. Preference Shares in registered form shall be transferred in writing in any usual or other form approved by the Board and executed by or on behalf of the transferor. The Company’s registrar shall register such transfers of Preference Shares in registered form by making the appropriate entries in the register of Preference Shares.

(iv) Return of Capital and Liquidation

In the event of any return of capital by reduction of capital or on liquidation, the holders of Ordinary Shares and the Staff Shares rank equallyare entitled to receive such capital in proportion to the amounts paid up or credited as paid up on the shares of each class, except thatclass.

Each Preference Share shall confer, in the event of a winding up or any return of capital by reduction of capital (other than, unless otherwise provided by their terms of issue, a redemption or purchase by the Company of any of its issued shares, or a reduction of share capital), the right to receive out of the surplus assets of the Company available for distribution amongst the members and in priority to the holders of the StaffOrdinary Shares are only entitled to participateand any other shares in the surplus assets available for distribution upCompany ranking junior to the relevant series of Preference Shares andpari passuwith any other class of Preference Shares, repayment of the amount paid up onor treated as paid up in respect of the Staff Shares plus 10%nominal value of such amount.the Preference Share together with any premium which was paid or treated as paid when the Preference Share was issued in addition to an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends.

(v) Redemption and Purchase

Subject to applicable legislation and the rights of the other shareholders, any share may be issued on terms that it is, at the option of the Company or the holder of such share, redeemable. TheWhile the Company currently has no redeemable shares in issue.

issue, any series of Preference Shares issued in the future will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company on a date not less than five years after the date on which such series of Preference Shares was first issued. The Company may purchase its own shares subject to the provisions of applicable legislation, the Articles and the approval of any class of convertible shares in issue (by extraordinaryspecial resolution or written consent of 75% of such class).

(vi) Calls on capital

The Directors may make calls upon the members in respect of any monies unpaid on their shares. A person upon whom a call is made remains liable even if the shares in respect of which the call is made have been transferred. Interest will be chargeable on any unpaid amount called at a rate determined by the Board (of not more than 20%).

If a member fails to pay any call in full (following notice from the Board that such failure will result in forfeiture of the relevant shares), such shares (including any dividends declared but not paid) may be forfeited by a resolution of the Board, and will become the property of the Company. Forfeiture shall not absolve a previous member for amounts payable by him/her (which may continue to accrue interest).

The Company also has a lien over all partly paid shares of the Company for all monies payable or called on that share and over the debts and liabilities of a member to the Company. If any monies which are the subject of the lien remain unpaid after a notice from the Board demanding payment, Barclaysthe Company may sell such shares.

(vii) Variation of Rights

The rights attached to any class of shares may be varied with the sanction of an extraordinarya special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.

The rights of shares shall not (unless expressly provided by the rights attached to such shares) be deemed varied by the creation of further shares ranking equally with them.

Annual and extraordinaryother general meetings

The Company is required to hold aan annual general meeting each year as its AGM in addition to such other meetings (called extraordinary general meetings)meetings as the Directors think fit. The type of the meeting will be specified in the notice calling it. Under the Companies Act 1985, not more than 15 months may elapse between the date of one AGM and the next. Under the Companies Act 2006, the AGM must be held within six months of the financial year end. An extraordinaryA general meeting may be convened by the Board on requisition in accordance with the applicable legislation.


306

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Shareholder information

In the case of an AGM, or a meeting for the passing of a special resolution (i.e. requiring the consent of a 75% majority) 21 clear days’ notice is required. In other cases 14 clear days’ notice is required. The notice must be in writing and must specify the place, the day and the hour of the meeting, and the general nature of the business to be transacted. A notice convening a meeting to pass an extraordinary ora special resolution shall specify the intention to propose the resolution as such. The accidental omissionfailure to give notice of a general meeting or the non-receipt of such notice will not invalidate the proceedings at such meeting.

Subject as noted above, all shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at general meetings. The Articles do, however, provide that arrangements may be made for simultaneous attendance at a general meeting at a place other than that specified in the notice of meeting, in which case shareholders may be excluded from the specified place.


Holders of Preference Shares have no right to receive notice of, attend or vote at, any general meetings of the Company as a result of holding Preference Shares.

270

Barclays

Annual Report 2007


Shareholder information

Limitations on foreign shareholders

There are no restrictions imposed by the Company’s Memorandum or Articles of Association or (subject to the effect of any economic sanctions that may be in force from time to time) by English lawcurrent UK laws which relate only to non-residents of the UK and which limit the rights of such non-residents to hold or (when entitled to do so) vote the Company’s Ordinary Shares.

Notices

A document or information may be sent by the Company in hard copy form, electronic form, by being made available on a website, or by another means agreed with the recipient. A document or information may only be sent in electronic form to a person who has agreed to receive it in that form or, in the case of a company, who has been deemed to have so agreed pursuant to applicable legislation. A document or information may only be sent by being made available on a website if the recipient has agreed to receive it in that form or has been deemed to have so agreed pursuant to applicable legislation, and has not revoked that agreement.

In respect of joint holdings, documents or information shall be sent to the joint holder whose name stands first in the register.

A member who (having no registered address within the UK) has not supplied an address in the UK at which documents or information may be sent is not entitled to have documents or information sent to him/her.

Alteration of share capital

The Company may, by way of ordinary resolution:

 

increase its share capital by a sum to be divided into shares of an amount prescribed by the resolution;

 

consolidate and divide all or any of its share capital into shares of a larger nominal amount;

 

subject to legislation, sub-divide all or part of its shares into shares of a smaller nominal amount and may decide by that resolution that the resulting shares have preference or other advantage or restrictions; and

 

cancel any shares which, at the date of the resolution, have not been subscribed or agreed to have been subscribed for and diminish the amount of its share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled.

The Company may also, by special resolution, reduce its share capital or capital redemption reserve or any share premium account or other undistributable reserve in any manner authorised by legislation.

The Company may, by ordinary resolution, upon the recommendation of the Board capitalise all or any part of an amount standing to the credit of a reserve or fund to be set free for distribution provided that amounts from the share premium account, capital redemption reserve or any profits not available for distribution should be applied only in paying up unissued shares issued to members and no unrealised profits shall be applied in paying up debentures of the Company or any amount unpaid on any share in the capital of the Company.

Indemnity

Subject to applicable legislation, every current and former Barclays Director or other officer and auditor of Barclaysthe Company (other than any person engaged by the company as auditor) shall be indemnified by Barclaysthe Company against any liability incurred by him/her in relation to the actualCompany, other than (broadly) any liability to the Company or purported exercisea member of the Group, or in connection with, his/her duties and powers.any criminal or regulatory fine.

Officers of the Group

Peter Estlin

Group Financial ControllerAppointed 2008

Lawrence Dickinson

Company SecretaryAppointed 2002

Patrick Gonsalves

Joint Secretary,
Barclays Bank PLCAppointed 2002

Mark Harding

Group General CounselAppointed 2003

Robert Le Blanc

Group Risk DirectorAppointed 2004

Taxation

The following is a summary of the principal tax consequences for holders of Ordinary Shares of Barclays PLC, Preference Shares of the Bank, or ADSs representing such Ordinary Shares or Preference Shares, and who are citizens or residents of the UK or US, or otherwise who are subject to UK tax or US federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of such securities, that own the shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. It is not, however, a comprehensive analysis of all the potential tax consequences for such holders, and it does not discuss the tax consequences of members of special classes of holders subject to special rules or holders that, directly or indirectly, hold 10% or more of Barclays voting stock. Investors are advised to consult their tax advisers regarding the tax implications of their particular holdings, including the consequences under applicable state and local law, and in particular whether they are eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, as defined below.

A US holder is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is, for US federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the US, (ii) a US domestic corporation, (iii) an estate whose income is subject to US federal income tax regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if a US court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more US persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

Unless otherwise noted, the statements of tax laws set out below are based on the tax laws of the UK in force as at 27th February 20082009 and are subject to any subsequent changes in UK law, in particular any announcements made in the Chancellor’s expected UK Budget in March 2008.April 2009.

This section is also based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions (the Code), and on the Double Taxation Convention between the UK and the US as entered into force in March 2003 (the Treaty), all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.

This section is based in part upon the representations of the ADR Depositary and the assumption that each obligation of the Deposit


Barclays

Annual Report 2008

307


LOGO

Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.

For purposes of the Treaty, the Estate and Gift Tax Convention between the United Kingdom and the United States, and the Code, the holders of ADRs evidencing ADSs will be treated as owners of the underlying ordinary shares or preference shares, as the case may be. Generally, exchanges of shares for ADRs and ADRs for shares will not be subject to US federal income tax or to UK capital gains tax.


Barclays

Annual Report 2007

271


LOGO

Taxation of UK holders

Taxation of dividends

In accordance with UK law, Barclays PLC and the Bank pay dividends on ordinary shares and preference shares without any deduction or withholding tax in respect of any taxes imposed by the UK government or any UK taxing authority.

If the shareholder is a UK resident individual liable to income tax only at the basic rate or the lower rate, then there will be no further tax liability in respect of the dividend received. If, however, the individual shareholder is subject to income tax at the higher rate (currently 40%), there will be a further liability to tax. Higher rate taxpayers are taxable on dividend income at a special rate (currently 32.5%) against which can be offset a tax credit of one-ninth of the cash dividend received. Tax credits are not repayable to shareholders with no tax liability.

Taxation of shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Where a shareholder elects to purchase shares using their cash dividend, the individual will be liable for income tax on dividends reinvested in the Plan on the same basis as if they had received the cash and arranged the investment themselves. They should accordingly include the dividend received in their annual tax return in the normal way. The tax consequences for a UK individual are the same as described in ‘Taxation of dividends’ above.

Taxation of capital gains

Where shares are disposed of by open market sale, a capital gain may result if the disposal proceeds exceed the sum of the base cost of the shares sold and any other allowable deductions such as share dealing costs and indexation relief (up to 5th April 1998) and taper relief (expected to be withdrawn for disposals after 5th April 2008). To arrive at the total base cost of any Barclays PLC shares held, the amount subscribed for rights taken up in 1985 and 1988 must be added to the cost of all other shares held. For this purpose, current legislation permits the market valuation at 31st March 1982 to be substituted for the original cost of shares purchased before that date.

The calculations required to compute chargeable capital gains particularly taper and indexation reliefs, may be complex. Capital gains may also arise from the gifting of shares to connected parties such as relatives (although not spouses or civil partners) and family trusts. Shareholders are advised to consult their personal financial adviser if further information regarding a possible tax liability in respect of their holdings of Barclays PLC shares is required.

Stamp duty

Stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax at the rate of 0.5% is normally payable on the purchase price of shares acquired.

 

Inheritance tax

An individual may be liable to inheritance tax on the transfer of ordinary shares or preference shares. Where an individual is liable, inheritance tax may be charged on the amount by which the value of his or her estate is reduced as a result of any transfer by way of gift or other gratuitous transaction made by them or treated as made by them.

Taxation of US holders

Taxation of dividends

ASubject to PFIC rules discussed below, a US holder is subject to US federal income taxation on the gross amount of any dividend paid by Barclays PLC or the Bank, as applicable, out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes). Dividends paid to a non-corporate US holder in taxable years beginning before 1st January 2011 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to the holder at a maximum tax rate of 15%, provided that the holder has a holding period of the shares or ADSs of more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date (or, in the case of preference shares or ADSs relating thereto, if the dividend is attributable to a period or periods aggregating over 366 days, provided that the holder holds the shares or ADSs for more than 90 days during the 181-day period beginning 90 days before the ex-dividend date) and meets certain other holding period requirements. Dividends paid by Barclays PLC or the Bank, as applicable, with respect to the ordinary or preference shares or ADSs will generally be qualified dividend income.

A US holder will not be subject to UK withholding tax. The US holder will include in gross income for US federal income tax purposes the amount of the dividend actually received from Barclays PLC or the Bank. Dividends must be included in income when the US holder, in the case of shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, actually or constructively receives the dividend, and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to US corporations in respect of dividends received from other US corporations. For foreign tax credit purposes, dividends will generally be income from sources outside the United States and will, depending on a US holder’s circumstances, be either ‘passive’ or ‘general’ income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to a US holder.

The amount of the dividend distribution includable in income will be the US Dollar value of the pound Sterling payments made, determined at the spot Pound Sterling/US Dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includable in income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into US Dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend payment is includable in income to the date the payment is converted into US Dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and, for foreign tax credit limitation purposes, from sources within the US and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income.

Distributions in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for US federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the US holder’s basis in the shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain.


 

272308 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Shareholder information

Taxation of capital gains

Generally,Subject to PFIC rules discussed below, generally, US holders will not be subject to UK tax, but will be subject to US tax on capital gains realised on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares, preference shares or ADSs. Capital gain of a noncorporate US holder that is recognised in taxable years beginning before 1st January 2011 is generally taxed at a maximum rate of 15% where the holder has a holding period of greater than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Taxation of premium on redemption or purchase of shares

No refund of tax will be available under the Treaty in respect of any premium paid on a redemption of preference shares by the Bank or on a purchase by Barclays PLC of its own shares. For US tax purposes, redemption premium generally will be treated as an additional amount realised in the calculation of gain or loss.

Taxation of passive foreign investment companies (PFICs)

Barclays PLC and the Bank believe that their respective shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for US federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If Barclays PLC or the Bank were to be treated as a PFIC, unless a US holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the shares or ADSs, gain realised on the sale or other disposition of their shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, for a US holder, such gain and certain ‘excess distributions’ would be treated as having been realised ratably over the holding period for the shares or ADSs and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain exceptions, a US holder’s shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if Barclays PLC or the Bank was a PFIC at any time during such holder’s holding period in their shares or ADSs. Dividends that a US holder receives from Barclays PLC or the Bank will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if Barclays PLC or the Bank are treated as a PFIC with respect to such US holder either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

Stamp duty

No UK stamp duty is payable on the transfer of an ADS, provided that the separate instrument of transfer is not executed in, and remains at all times outside, the UK.

Estate and gift tax

Under the Estate and Gift Tax Convention between the United Kingdom and the United States, a US holder generally is not subject to UK inheritance tax.

 

Exchange controls and other limitations affecting security holders

Other than certain economic sanctions which may be in force from time to time, there are currently no UK laws, decrees or regulations which would affect the transfer of capital or remittance of dividends, interest and other payments to holders of Barclays securities who are not residents of the UK. There are also no restrictions under the Articles of Association of either Barclays PLC or the Bank, or (subject to the effect of any such economic sanctions) under current UK laws, which relate only to non-residents of the UK, and which limit the right of such non-residents to hold Barclays securities or, when entitled to vote, to do so.

Documents on display

It is possible to read and copy documents that have been filed by Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC with the US Securities and Exchange Commission at the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s office of Investor Education and Assistance located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549-0213.20549. Please call the US Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges. Filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services, and from the website maintained by the US Securities and Exchange Commission atwww.sec.gov.


 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 273
 309


LOGOLOGO

 

ShareholdersShareholder enquiries

Investors who have any questions about their investment in Barclays, or about Barclays in general,

may write to the Director, Investor Relations at our head office as follows:

Director, Investor Relations

Barclays PLC

1 Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

or, in the United States of America,

The Corporate Communications Department

Barclays Bank PLC

200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166, USA

Registered and Head office:

1 Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7116 1000

Registrar:

The Registrar to Barclays PLC

Aspect House

Spencer Road

Lancing

West Sussex

BN99 6DA

Tel: 0871 384 2055*

or +44 (0) 121 415 7004 (from overseas)

Email: questions@share-registers.co.uk

ADR Depositary:

TheJPMorgan Chase Bank, of New YorkN.A.

PO Box 1125864504

Church Street StationSt. Paul

New YorkMN 55164-0504

NY 10286-1258USA

Tel: 1-888-BNY-ADRS1-800-990-1135 (toll-free for US domestic callers)

or +1 212 815 3700651 453 2128

Email: shareowners@bankofny.comjpmorgan.adr@wellsfargo.com

 

*Calls to this number are charged at 8p per minute if using a BT landline.
   Callcharges may vary if using other telephone providers.

*Calls to this number are charged at 8p per minute if using a BT landline.

 Call charges may vary if using other telephone providers.


 

274310 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008


Annual report 2007Report 2008 index

 

Accountability and Audit  143    Corporate sustainability  59
Accounting      Credit risk  225
    developments  158    Critical accounting estimates  48
    policies  149    Currency of presentation  149
    presentation  158    Currency risk  223
Acquisitions      Derivatives and other financial instruments  
    notes to the accounts  204        notes to the accounts  172
Allowance for impairment      Directors’ and officers’  
    notes to the accounts  238        biographies  112
    risk management  104        emoluments  115
Annual General Meeting  116        interests  115
Annual Report and Accounts (approval)  160        notes to the accounts  211
Assets      Directors’ report  114
    by class of business  248    Dividends  166
    by geographical region  249    Earnings per share  171
    other  175    

Employees

  
Auditors      

    equality and diversity

  115
    reports  147    

    involvement

  115
Available for sale investments  175    

Events after the balance sheet date

  212
Balance sheet      

Fair values of financial instruments

  244
    average  54    

Financial assets designated at fair value

  171
    consolidated  161    

Financial Data

  
    consolidated (Barclays Bank)  251    

    Barclays Bank PLC

  263
Barclaycard      

    Barclays PLC

  6
    business analysis  18    

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

  181
    business description  8, 17    

Financial review

  3
Barclays Bank PLC      

Financial risks

  218
    consolidated accounts  250    

Glossary

  2
    financial data  263    

Goodwill

  179
    notes to the accounts  254    

Head office functions and other operations

  
Barclays Capital      

    business analysis

  32
    business analysis  26    

    business description

  9, 31
    business description  9, 25    

Impairment charges

  
Barclays Commercial Bank      

    notes to the accounts

  168
    business analysis  16    

    risk management

  84
    business description  8, 15    

Income statement

  
Barclays Global Investors      

    consolidated

  160
    business analysis  28    

    consolidated (Barclays Bank)

  251
    business description  9, 27    

Insurance assets and liabilities

  182
    BGI Equity Ownership Plan (EOP)  133    

Insurance premiums and insurance claims and benefits

  167
Barclays Wealth      

Intangible assets

  180
    business analysis  30    

Interest rate risk

  220
    business description  9, 29    

Internal control

  143
Capital adequacy data      

International Retail and Commercial Banking

  
    total assets and risk weighted assets  40    

    business analysis

  20
    capital management  42    

    business description

  8, 19
    capital ratios  43    

International Retail and Commercial Banking

  
    capital resources  44    

– excluding Absa

  
Capital management  246    

    business analysis

  22
Cash flow statement      

    business description

  8, 21
    consolidated  163      
    consolidated (Barclays Bank)  253      
    notes to the accounts  166      
Competition and regulatory matters  202      
Concentrations of credit risk  230      
Contingent liabilities and commitments  200      
Contractual obligations  46      
Corporate governance        
    corporate governance report  117      
    attendance at board meetings  118      

Absa

business analysis

44

business description

43

Accountability and Audit

173

Accounting

developments

188

policies

179

presentation

178

Acquisitions

notes to the accounts

235

Allowance for impairment

notes to the accounts

259

risk management

129

Annual General Meeting

142

Annual Report and Accounts (approval)

190

Assets

by class of business

281

other

205

Auditors

reports

177

Available for sale investments

205

Balance sheet

average

21

consolidated

191

consolidated (Barclays Bank)

287

Barclaycard

business analysis

38

business description

37

Barclays Bank PLC

consolidated accounts

286

financial data

299

notes to the accounts

290

Barclays Capital

business analysis

46

business description

45

Barclays Commercial Bank

business analysis

36

business description

35

Barclays Global Investors

business analysis

48

business description

47

BGI Equity Ownership Plan (EOP)

171

Barclays Wealth

business analysis

50

business description

49

Capital adequacy data

total assets and risk weighted assets

14

capital management

17

capital ratios

17

capital resources

17

Capital management

278

Cash flow statement

consolidated

193

consolidated (Barclays Bank)

289

notes to the accounts

196

Competition and regulatory matters

232

Concentrations of credit risk

253

Contingent liabilities and commitments

230

Contractual obligations

19

Corporate governance

corporate governance report

143

attendance at board meetings

149

Corporate sustainability

53

Credit risk

250

Critical accounting estimates

27

Currency of presentation

179

Currency risk

267

Derivatives and other financial instruments

notes to the accounts

202

Directors’ and officers’

biographies

138

emoluments

141

interests

141

notes to the accounts

240

Directors’ report

140

Dividends

196

Earnings per share

200

Emerging Markets

business analysis

42

business description

41

Employees

equality and diversity

141

involvement

141

Events after the balance sheet date

244

Fair value of financial instruments

273

Financial assets designated at fair value

201

Financial data

Barclays Bank PLC

299

Barclays PLC

2

Financial liabilities designated at fair value

211

Financial review

2

Financial risks

250

Global Retail and Commercial Banking

business analysis

31

Glossary

313

Goodwill

208

Head office functions and other operations

business analysis

52

business description

51

Impairment charges

notes to the accounts

198

risk management

87

Income statement

consolidated

190

consolidated (Barclays Bank)

286

Insurance assets and liabilities

212

Insurance premiums and insurance claims and benefits

197

Barclays

Annual Report 2008

311


LOGO

Intangible assets

209

Interest rate risk

266

Investment Banking and Investment Management

business analysis

32

Investment in associates and joint ventures

207

Leasing

233

Legal proceedings

231

Liabilities

other

211

Liquidity risk

268

Loans and advances to banks

interest rate sensitivity

123

maturity analysis

123

notes to the accounts

204

Loans and advances to customers

interest rate sensitivity

123

maturity analysis

123

notes to the accounts

204

Market risk

264

Memorandum and Articles of Association

305

Minority interests

230

Net fee and commission income

notes to the accounts

196

summary

5

Net interest income

notes to the accounts

196

summary

4

Off-balance sheet arrangements

25

Operating expenses

administration and general expenses

198

staff costs

198

summary

8

Ordinary shares, share premiums, and other equity

called up

226

Other entities

239

Other income

notes to the accounts

197

summary

6

Our people

55

Parent company accounts (Barclays PLC)

194

Pensions

directors

164

notes to the accounts

220

Principal subsidiaries

238

Principal transactions

notes to the accounts

197

summary

6

Potential credit risk loans

84

Presentation of information

176

Property, plant and equipment

210

Provisions

218

Recent developments

189

Related party transactions

240

Remuneration report

2008 annual remuneration

157

Group Chairman and executive Directors: beneficial shareholdings

163

Reserves

228

Results by business

31

Risk factors

57

Risk management

Barclays approach to risk management

62

credit risk management

67

market risk management

106

liquidity risk management

111

capital risk management

114

operational risk management

117

financial crime risk management

120

statistical information

122

supervision and regulation

135

Risk Tendency

122

Risk weighted assets

14

Securities borrowing, securities lending, repurchase and

reverse repurchase agreements

205

Securitisation

219

Segmental reporting

by class of business

281

by geographical segments

284

Share-based payments

244

Shareholder information

301

Short-term borrowings

18

Statement of recognised income and expense

consolidated

192

consolidated (Barclays Bank)

288

Subordinated liabilities

214

Taxation

notes to the accounts

199

shareholder information

307

Total assets

14

Trading portfolio

201

Trust activities

187

UK Retail Banking

business analysis

34

business description

33

Western Europe

business analysis

40

business description

39

312

Barclays

Annual Report 2008


Glossary of terms

 

Barclays

Term used in Annual Report 2007

  275US equivalent or brief description

Accounts

Financial statements

Allotted

Issued

Attributable profit

Net income

Called up share capital

Ordinary shares, issued and fully paid

Capital allowances

Tax term equivalent to US tax depreciation allowances

Cash at bank and in hand

Cash

Class of business

Industry segment

Finance lease

Capital lease

Freehold

Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity

Loans and advances

Lendings

Loan capital

Long-term debt

Net asset value

Book value

Profit

Income

Share capital

Ordinary shares, capital stock or common stock issued and fully paid

Share premium account

Additional paid-up capital or paid-in surplus (not distributable)

Shares in issue

Shares outstanding

Write-offs

Charge-offs


LOGO

 

International Retail and Commercial Banking

    Results by nature of income and expense  33
– Absa    Risk factors  63
    business analysis  22  Risk management  
    business description  8, 21      allowances for impairment  84
Investment in associates and joint ventures  178      capital and liquidity risk management  64

Leasing

  203      credit risk management  63

Legal proceedings

  201      disclosures about certain trading activities  

Liabilities

        including non-exchange contracts  90

    other

  181      governance structure  69

Liquidity risk

  240      insurance risk  64

Loans and advances to banks

        loans and advances to customers  98

    interest rate sensitivity

  98      management of operational risk and business risk  63

    maturity analysis

  98      market risk management  63

    notes to the accounts

  174      potential credit risk loans  82

Loans and advances to customers

        risk responsibilities  218

    interest rate sensitivity

  98      statistical information  97

    maturity analysis

  101      taxation risk  64

    notes to the accounts

  174  Risk Tendency  66

Market risk

  218  Risk weighted assets  246

Memorandum and Articles of Association

  269  Securities borrowing, securities lending, repurchase and reverserepurchase agreements  175
Minority interests  200    

Net fee and commission income

    Securitisation  189

    notes to the accounts

  166  Segmental reporting  

    summary

  34      by class of business  248

Net interest income

        by geographical segments  249

    notes to the accounts

  166  Share-based payments  212

    summary

  32  Shareholder information  267

Off-balance sheet arrangements

  51  Short-term borrowings  45

Operating expenses

    Statement of recognised income and expense  

    administration and general expenses

  36      consolidated  162

    staff costs

  37      consolidated (Barclays Bank)  252

    summary

  36  Subordinated liabilities  184

Ordinary shares and share premium

    Supervision and regulation  110

    called up

  197  Taxation  

Other entities

  207      notes to the accounts  170

Other income

        shareholder information  271

    notes to the accounts

  167  Total assets  40

    summary

  35  Trading portfolio  171

Parent company accounts (Barclays PLC)

  164  Trust activities  157

Pensions

    UK Banking  

    directors

  136      business analysis  12

    notes to the accounts

  190      business description  8, 11

Principal subsidiaries

  206  UK Retail Banking  

Principal transactions

        business analysis  14

    notes to the accounts

  167      business description  8, 13

    summary

  34    

Potential credit risk loans

  82    

Presentation of information

  146    

Property, plant and equipment

  181    

Provisions

  188    

Recent developments

  159    

Related party transactions

  208    

Remuneration report

      

    2007 annual remuneration

  128    

    chairman and executive directors: beneficial shareholdings

  137    

Reserves

  198    

Results by business

  10    
      
      

‘Income’ refers to total income net of insurance claims, unless otherwise specified.

‘Profit before business disposals’ represents profit before tax and disposal of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures.

‘Cost:income ratio’ is defined as operating expenses compared to total income net of insurance claims.

‘Risk Tendency’ is a statistical estimate of the average loss for each loan portfolio for a 12-month period, taking into account the size of the portfolio and its risk characteristics under current economic conditions, and is used to track the change in risk as the portfolio of loans changes over time.

‘Daily Value at Risk (DVaR)’is an estimate of the potential loss which might arise from unfavourable market movements, if the current positions were to be held unchanged for one business day, measured to a confidence level of 98%.

‘Absa Group Limited’refers to the consolidated results of the South African group of which the parent company is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE Limited) in which Barclays owns a controlling stake.

‘Absa’refers to the results for Absa Group Limited as consolidated into the results of Barclays PLC; translated into Sterling with adjustments for amortisation of intangible assets, certain head office adjustments, transfer pricing and minority interests.

‘Global Retail and Commercial Banking – Absa’ is the portion of Absa’s results that is reported by Barclays within the Global Retail and Commercial Banking business.

‘Absa Capital’ is the portion of Absa’s results that is reported by Barclays within the Barclays Capital business.


 

276 

Barclays

Annual Report 20072008

 313


Signatures

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Date March 26, 200824, 2009 

Barclays PLC

(Registrant)

 By 

/s/    Chris Lucas

  Chris Lucas, Group Finance Director

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Date March 26, 200824, 2009 

Barclays Bank PLC

(Registrant)

 By 

/s/    Chris Lucas

  Chris Lucas, Group Finance Director

Barclays

Annual Report 2007

277


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

  

DESCRIPTION

1.1  Memorandum and Articles of Association of Barclays PLC
1.2  Memorandum and Articles of Association of Barclays Bank PLC
2.1  Long term debt instruments
4.1  Rules of the Barclays Group Performance Share Plan (2005) (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.2  Rules of the Barclays PLC Renewed 1986 Executive Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference to the 2000Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form 20-FS-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on April 16September 29th, 2001)2008)
4.3  Rules of the Barclays PLC Approved Incentive Share Option Plans and Appendix relating to eligible employees resident in FrancePlan (incorporated by reference to the 2004Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form 20-FS-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on March 24September 29th, 2005)2008)
4.4Rules of the Barclays PLC Unapproved Incentive Share Option Plans (incorporated by reference to the Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on September 29th, 2008)
4.5Rules of the Barclays PLC Executive Share Award Scheme (incorporated by reference to the Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on September 29th, 2008)
4.6Rules of the Barclays Group Special Award Performance Share Plan (incorporated by reference to the Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on September 29th, 2008)
4.7

Rules of the Barclays Group Incentive Share Plan (incorporated by reference to the Barclays PLC Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-153723) filed on September 29th, 2008)

4.8Rules of Barclays Bank PLC 1999 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (amended and restated, effective January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Barclays Bank PLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-149301) filed on February 19, 2008)


EXHIBIT
NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

4.9Rules of Barclays Bank PLC Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan (amended and restated, effective January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Barclays Bank PLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-149302) filed on February 19, 2008)
4.10  Service Contract – John Varley (incorporated by reference to the 2003 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2004)
4.5Service Contract – Naguib Kheraj (incorporated by reference to the 2003 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2004)
4.64.11  Service Contract and Subsequent Side Letter to Service Contract – Gary Hoffman (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.74.12  Service Contract – Robert E. Diamond Jr (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.84.13Employment Contract and Assignment Agreement – Frederik Seegers (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.14Contract of Employment – Christopher Lucas (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.15Addendum to contract of employment between Barclays Bank plc and Gary Hoffman (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.16Addendum to contract of employment between Barclays Bank plc and John Varley (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.17  Appointment Letter and Subsequent Amendment to appoint as Senior Independent Director – Sir Richard Broadbent (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)
4.94.18  Appointment Letter – Professor Dame Sandra Dawson (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)
4.104.19  Appointment Letter and Subsequent Amendment to appoint as Deputy Chairman – Sir Nigel Rudd (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)
4.114.20  Appointment Letter – Stephen Russell (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)
4.124.21  Appointment Letter – Leigh Clifford (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)


4.134.22  Appointment Letter – Sir Andrew Likierman (incorporated by reference to the 2004 Form 20-F filed on March 24th, 2005)


4.14

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

4.23  Appointment Letter – Dr Daniël Cronjé (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.154.24  Appointment Letter – John Sunderland (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.164.25  IndemnityAppointment Letter – Matthew BarrettMarcus Agius (incorporated by reference to the 20052006 Form 20-F filed on March 2926th, 2006)2007)
4.174.26Appointment Letter – Fulvio Conti (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.27Appointment Letter – David Booth (incorporated by reference to the 2007 20-F filed on March 26th, 2008)
4.28Appointment Letter – Sir Michael Rake (incorporated by reference to the 2007 20-F filed on March 26th, 2008)
4.29Appointment Letter – Patience Wheatcroft (incorporated by reference to the 2007 20-F filed on March 26th, 2008)
4.30Appointment Letter – Simon Fraser
4.31  Indemnity Letter – John Varley (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.18Indemnity Letter – Naguib Kheraj (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.194.32  Indemnity Letter – Gary Hoffman (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.20Indemnity Letter – David Roberts (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.214.33  Indemnity Letter – Robert E. Diamond Jr (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.224.34  Indemnity Letter – Sir Richard Broadbent (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.234.35  Indemnity Letter – Professor Dame Sandra Dawson (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)


4.24

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

4.36  Indemnity Letter – Sir Nigel Rudd (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.254.37  Indemnity Letter – Stephen Russell (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.264.38  Indemnity Letter – Leigh Clifford (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.274.39  Indemnity Letter – Sir Andrew Likierman (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.284.40  Indemnity Letter – Dr Daniël Cronjé (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)


4.29Indemnity Letter – Robert Steel (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.304.41  Indemnity Letter – John Sunderland (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.31Indemnity Letter – Sir David Arculus (incorporated by reference to the 2005 Form 20-F filed on March 29th, 2006)
4.32Employment Contract and Assignment Agreement – Frederik Seegers (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.33Appointment Letter – Marcus Agius (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.34Contract of Employment – Christopher Lucas (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.35Appointment Letter – Fulvio Conti (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.36Addendum to contract of employment between Barclays Bank plc and Gary Hoffman (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.37Addendum to contract of employment between Barclays Bank plc and John Varley (incorporated by reference to the 2006 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2007)
4.38Appointment Letter – David Booth
4.39Appointment Letter – Sir Michael Rake
4.40Appointment Letter – Patience Wheatcroft
4.41Rules of the Barclays PLC Executive Share Award Scheme
4.42  Rules ofTerm sheet for Barclays Bank PLC 1999 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (amended and restated, effective January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Barclays Bank PLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-149301) filed on February 19, 2008)Warrants
4.43  Rules ofTerm Sheet for Barclays Bank PLC Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan (amended and restated, effective January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Barclays Bank PLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-149302) filed on February 19, 2008)£4.05 billion Mandatory Convertible Notes (MCNs)
7.1  Ratios of earnings under IFRS to fixed charges
7.2  Ratios of earnings under IFRS to combined fixed charges, preference share dividends and similar appropriations
8.1  List of subsidiaries
11.1  Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to the 2003 Form 20-F filed on March 26th, 2004)


12.1  Certifications filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13(a)-14(a)
13.1  Certifications filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13(a) and 18 U.S.C 1350(a) and 1350(b)
15.1  Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for incorporation by reference of reports in certain securities registration statements of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC.