As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 20122013

 

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Or

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112012

Or

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Or

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-3334

Commission file number: 1-13688

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC REED ELSEVIER NV
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
England The Netherlands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation)
1-3 Strand, London, WC2N 5JR, England Radarweg 29, 1043 NX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices) (Address of principal executive offices)
Henry Udow Jans van der Woude
Company Secretary Company Secretary
Reed Elsevier PLC Reed Elsevier NV
1-3 Strand, London, WC2N 5JR, England Radarweg 29, 1043 NX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
011 44 20 7930 70777166 5500 011 31 20 485 2222
henry.udow@reedelsevier.com j.vanderwoude@reedelsevier.com
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of
Company Contact Person)
 (Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of
Company Contact Person)
Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

  

Name of exchange on which


registered

Reed Elsevier PLC:

  

American Depositary Shares
(each representing four Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares)

  New York Stock Exchange

Ordinary shares of 14 51/116p each
(the “Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares”)

  New York Stock Exchange*

Reed Elsevier NV:

  

American Depositary Shares
(each representing two Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares)

  New York Stock Exchange

Ordinary shares of €0.07 each
(the “Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares”)

  New York Stock Exchange*

 

*Listed, not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of the applicable Registrant’s American Depositary Shares issued in respect thereof.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers’ classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

Reed Elsevier PLC:

  Number of outstanding shares  

Ordinary shares of 14 51/116p each

   1,250,913,5651,257,597,977  

Reed Elsevier NV:

  

Ordinary shares of €0.07 each

   724,077,755725,984,225  

R shares of €0.70 each (held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC)

   4,303,179  

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes                þ                 No                ¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes                ¨                No                þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes                þ                No                ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes                ¨                No                ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, or non-accelerated filers. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  þ                            Accelerated filer  ¨                            Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrants have used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing.

¨     US GAAP            þ    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board            ¨    Other

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrants have elected to follow:

Item 17        ¨                     Item 18        ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes                ¨                  No                þ

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

      Page 

GENERAL

   1  

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

   2  

PART I

    

ITEM 1:

  IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS   N/A  

ITEM 2:

  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE   N/A  

ITEM 3:

  KEY INFORMATION   3  
  

Selected Financial Data

   3  
  

Risk Factors

   7  

ITEM 4:

  INFORMATION ON REED ELSEVIER   11  
  

History and Development

   11  
  

Business Overview

   13  
  

Government Regulation

   24  
  

Organisational Structure

   24  
  

Property, Plants and Equipment

   24  

ITEM 4A:

  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS   N/A  

ITEM 5:

  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS   25  
  

Operating Results — Reed Elsevier

   25  
  

Liquidity and Capital Resources — Reed Elsevier

   3534  
  

Contractual Obligations

   35  
  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

   3635  
  

Short Term Borrowings

   37  
  

Operating Results — Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV

   3938  
  

Trend Information

   4039  

ITEM 6:

  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES   4140  
  

Directors

   4140  
  

Senior Management

   42  
  

Compensation

   4342  
  

Board Practices

   5856  
  

Employees

   6058  
  

Share Ownership

   6159  

ITEM 7:

  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS   6866  
  

Major Shareholders

   6866  
  

Related Party Transactions

   6967  

ITEM 8:

  FINANCIAL INFORMATION   7068  

ITEM 9:

  THE OFFER AND LISTING   7169  
  

Trading Markets

   7169  

ITEM 10:

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION   7371  
  

Memorandum and Articles of Association

   7371  
  

Material Contracts

   7876  
  

Exchange Controls

   7876  
  

Taxation

   7876  
  

Documents on Display

   8179  

ITEM 11:

  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK   8280  

ITEM 12:

  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES   8482  


      Page 

PART II

    

ITEM 13:

  DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES   N/A  

ITEM 14:

  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS   N/A  

ITEM 15:

  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES   8583  

ITEM 16A:

  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT   9189  

ITEM 16B:

  CODES OF ETHICS   9189  

ITEM 16C:

  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES   9189  

ITEM 16D:

  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES   9290  

ITEM 16E:

  PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS   9290  

ITEM 16F:

  CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT   9290  

ITEM 16G:

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE   9290  

PART III

    

ITEM 17:

  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS*   9391  

ITEM 18:

  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   F-1  

ITEM 19:

  EXHIBITS   S-3  

 

*The registrants have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this Item.


 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

 


GENERAL

Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV conduct their business through two jointly owned companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have retained their separate legal and national identities. “Reed Elsevier” is not a legal entity but a collective reference to the separate legal entities of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. The businesses of all of the entities comprising Reed Elsevier are collectively referred to in this annual report as “Reed Elsevier”, and the financial statements of the combined businesses are referred to as the “combined financial statements”. In this annual report, references to “we”, “our”, or “us” are to all of the entities comprising Reed Elsevier.

In this annual report, references to US dollars, $ and ¢ are to US currency; references to sterling, £, pence or p are to UK currency; references to euro and € are to the currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains or incorporates by reference a number of forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act 1934, as amended, with respect to:

 

  

financial condition;

 

  

results of operations;

 

  

competitive positions;

 

  

the features and functions of and markets for the products and services we offer; and

 

  

our business plans and strategies.

We consider any statements that are not historical facts to be “forward looking statements”. These statements are based on the current expectations of the management of our businesses and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from those expressed in any forward looking statement. These differences could be material; therefore, you should evaluate forward looking statements in light of various important factors, including those set forth or incorporated by reference in this annual report.document.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or forecasts contained in the forward looking statements include, among others:

 

  

competitive factors in the industries in which we operate;

 

  

demand for our products and services;

 

  

exchange rate fluctuations;

 

  

general economic, political and business conditions;

 

  

legislative, fiscal, tax and regulatory developments and political risks;

 

  

the availability of third party content and data;

 

  

breaches of our data security systems or other unauthorised access to our databases;

 

  

our ability to maintain high quality management;

 

  

changes in law and legal interpretation affecting our intellectual property rights and internet communications;

 

  

uncertainties as to whether our strategies, business plans and acquisitions will produce the expected returns;

 

  

significant failures or interruptions of our electronic platforms;

 

  

failure of third parties to whom we have outsourced business activities;

 

  

changes in the market values of defined benefit pension scheme assets and in the market related assumptions used to value scheme liabilities;

 

  

downgrades to the credit ratings of our debt;

 

  

breaches of generally accepted ethical business standards or applicable statutes;

 

  

our ability to manage our environmental impact; and

 

  

other risks referenced from time to time in the filings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC��“SEC”).

The terms “estimate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “should be”, “will be”, “believe” and similar expressions identify forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are found at various places throughout this annual report and the other documents incorporated by reference in this annual report (see “Item 19: Exhibits” on pagepages S-3 and S-4 of this annual report).

You should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM  3: KEY INFORMATION

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

REED ELSEVIER

The selected combined financial data for Reed Elsevier should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, the combined financial statements included in this annual report. In addition, as separate legal entities, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV prepare separate consolidated financial statements which reflect their respective shareholders’ economic interests in Reed Elsevier accounted for on an equity basis.

All of the selected financial data for Reed Elsevier set out below has been extracted or derived from the audited combined financial statements.

Combined Income Statement Data(1)

 

  For the year ended December 31,   For the year ended December 31, 
   2011(2)      2011       2010       2009       2008       2007      2012(2)    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008   
  (in millions)   (in millions) 

Amounts in accordance with IFRS:

                   

Revenue — continuing operations

  $9,603    £6,002    £6,055    £6,071    £5,334    £4,584  

Operating profit — continuing operations(3)

   1,928     1,205     1,090     787     901     888  

Revenue

  $9,908   £6,116   £6,002   £6,055   £6,071   £5,334  

Operating profit(3)

   2,200    1,358    1,205    1,090    787    901  

Net finance costs

   (376   (235   (276   (291   (192   (139   (350  (216  (235  (276  (291  (192

Disposals and other non operating items(4)

   (35   (22   (46   (61   (92   63     73    45    (22  (46  (61  (92

Profit before tax — continuing operations

   1,517     948     768     435     617     812  

Profit before tax

   1,923    1,187    948    768    435    617  

Taxation(5)

   (290   (181   (120   (40   (155   82     (183  (113  (181  (120  (40  (155

Net profit from continuing operations

   1,227     767     648     395     462     894  

Net profit

   1,740    1,074    767    648    395    462  

Net profit from discontinued operations(6)

                       18     309                         18  

Non-controlling interests

   (11   (7   (6   (4   (4   (3   (8  (5  (7  (6  (4  (4

Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders

   1,216     760     642     391     476     1,200     1,732    1,069    760    642    391    476  

Combined Statement of Financial Position Data(1)

 

  As at December 31,   As at December 31, 
   2011(2)    2011     2010     2009     2008     2007      2012(2)    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008   
  (in millions)   (in millions) 

Amounts in accordance with IFRS:

              

Total assets

  $17,829   £11,503   £11,158   £11,334   £12,866   £9,778    $17,843   £11,014   £11,503   £11,158   £11,334   £12,866  

Long term borrowings

   (5,118  (3,300  (3,786  (4,028  (5,694  (2,002   (5,122  (3,162  (3,300  (3,786  (4,028  (5,694

Net assets

   3,405    2,197    1,970    1,759    981    2,976     3,749    2,314    2,197    1,970    1,759    981  

Non-controlling interests

   (39  (25  (27  (27  (28  (11   (55  (34  (25  (27  (27  (28

Combined shareholders’ equity

   3,366    2,172    1,943    1,732    953    2,965     3,694    2,280    2,172    1,943    1,732    953  

 

(1)The combined financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting policies that are in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and as adopted by the European Union (“EU”). The figures for 20082009 and 20072008 have been extracted or derived from the combined financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, not included herein.

 

(2)Noon buying rates as at December 31, 20112012 have been used to provide a convenience translation into US dollars, see “— Exchange Rates” on page 6. At December 31, 20112012 the noon buying rate was $1.55$1.62 per £1.00. This compares to the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of $1.60$1.59 to £1.00 applied in the translation of the combined income statement for the year.

 

(3)Operating profit — continuing operations, is stated after charging £359£329 million in respect of amortisation of acquired intangible assets (2010:(2011: £359 million; 2010: £349 million; 2009: £368 million; 2008: £281 million; 2007: £221 million); £nilnil in respect of impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill (2010:(2011: nil; 2010: nil; 2009: £177 million; 2008: £9 million; 2007: nil)million); £nilnil in respect of exceptional restructuring costs (2010:(2011: nil; 2010: £57 million; 2009: £182 million; 2008: £152 million; 2007: nil)million); £52£21 million in respect of acquisition related costs (2010:(2011: £52 million; 2010: £50 million; 2009: £48 million; 2008: £27 million; 2007: £20 million); a credit of £1 millionnil in respect of the share of joint ventures’ profit on disposals (2010:(2011: £1 million credit; 2010: nil; 2009: nil; 2008: nil; 2007: nil) and £11£5 million in respect of taxation in joint ventures (2010:(2011: £11 million; 2010: £9 million; 2009: £8 million; 2008: £9 million; 2007: £8 million). Impairment charges in 2009 relate principally to Reed Business Information’s US and International businesses.Information. Exceptional restructuring costs in 2010 relate only to the restructuring of the Reed Business Information business and in 2009 and 2008 relate to the exceptional restructuring programmes across Reed Elsevier.

(4)Disposals and other non operating items comprise a £28an £86 million lossprofit on disposal of businesses (2010: £54(2011: £12 million loss; 2010: £32 million loss; 2009: £69£49 million loss; 2008: £86 million loss; 2007: £65loss), a £60 million gain)charge to property provisions on disposed businesses (2011: £16 million; 2010: £22 million; 2009: £20 million; 2008: nil), and a £6£19 million gain relating to the revaluation of held for trading investments (2010:(2011: £6 million gain; 2010: £8 million gain; 2009: £8 million gain; 2008: £6 million loss; 2007: £2 million loss).

 

(5)Taxation in 20112012 includes credits of nil (2010: £7 million; 2009: £34 million) in respect ofan exceptional prior year disposals. Taxation in continuing operations in 2007 includes creditstax credit of £223£96 million in respect(2011: nil; 2010: nil; 2009: nil; 2008: nil) relating to the resolution of previously unrecognised deferreda number of significant prior year tax assets and capital losses that were realised as a result of the disposal of discontinued operations.matters.

 

(6)Net profit from discontinued operations in 2008 includes the gain of £67 million on disposal of the educational assessment business and in 2007 the gain of £611 million on disposal of the US K-12 Schools and International educational business. Taxes on the completed disposals in 2008 were £49 million and in 2007 £380 million.

REED ELSEVIER PLC

The selected financial data for Reed Elsevier PLC should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC included in this annual report. The results and financial position of Reed Elsevier PLC reflect the 52.9% economic interest of Reed Elsevier PLC’s shareholders in Reed Elsevier, after taking account of results arising in Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries. These interests have been accounted for on an equity basis.

All of the selected consolidated financial data for Reed Elsevier PLC set out below has been extracted or derived from the audited financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC.

 

  For the year ended December 31,   For the year ended December 31, 
  2011(3) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007   2012(3) 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 
  (in millions, except per share amounts)   (in millions, except per share amounts) 

Amounts in accordance with IFRS:(1)

              

Profit before tax(2)

  $624   £390   £328   £201   £247   £643    $884   £546   £390   £328   £201   £247  

Taxation

   (2  (1  (1  (6  (6  (19   10    6    (1  (1  (6  (6

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

   622    389    327    327    195    241     894    552    389    327    195    241  

Earnings per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share from total operations of the combined businesses

   50.3¢   32.4  27.3  17.2  22.1  49.7   74.5¢   46.0  32.4  27.3  17.2  22.1

Earnings per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share from continuing operations of the combined businesses

   50.3¢   32.4  27.3  17.2  21.2  36.6   74.5¢   46.0  32.4  27.3  17.2  21.2

Diluted earnings per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share from total operations of the combined businesses

   49.8¢   32.1  27.1  17.1  21.9  49.1   73.5¢   45.4  32.1  27.1  17.1  21.9

Dividends per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share(4)

   32.0¢   20.65  20.4  20.4  100.9  16.3   35.5¢   21.9  20.65  20.4  20.4  100.9

Total assets

  $1,796   £1,158   £1,037   £927   £515   £1,584    $1,955   £1,207   £1,158   £1,037   £927   £515  

Total equity/Net assets

   1,781    1,149    1,028    916    504    1,568     1,954    1,206    1,149    1,028    916    504  

Weighted average number of shares(5)

   1,202.0    1,202.0    1,199.1    1,131.4    1,089.5    1,256.5     1,200.6    1,200.6    1,202.0    1,199.1    1,131.4    1,089.5  

 

(1)The consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC are prepared in accordance with accounting policies that are in conformity with IFRS as issued by the IASB and as adopted by the EU. The figures for 20082009 and 20072008 have been extracted or derived from the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, not included herein.

 

(2)Profit before tax includes Reed Elsevier PLC’s share of the post-tax earnings of joint ventures, being both the continuing and discontinued operations of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. Profit before tax in 2008 includes Reed Elsevier PLC’s £10 million share of joint ventures’ post-tax gain on disposal of the educational assessment business and in 2007 the £122 million share of joint ventures’ post-tax net gain on disposal of the US K-12 Schools and International educational businesses.business.

 

(3)Noon buying rates as at December 31, 20112012 have been used to provide a convenience translation into US dollars, see “—“�� Exchange Rates” on page 6. At December 31, 20112012 the noon buying rate was $1.55$1.62 per £1.00. This compares to the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of $1.60$1.59 to £1.00 applied in the translation of the combined income statement for the year.

 

(4)The amount of dividends per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share shown excludes the UK tax credit available to certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders, including beneficial owners of Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs who are residents of the United States for the purposes of the UK Tax Treaty, and does not include any deduction on account of UK withholding taxes, currently at the rate of 15% of the sum of the dividend and the related tax credit in most cases;shareholders; see “Item 10: Additional Information — Taxation”.

 

  Dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise a 20102011 final dividend of 15.0p15.9p and 20112012 interim dividend of 5.65p6.00p giving a total of 20.65p.21.9p. The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC have proposed a 20112012 final dividend of 15.90p (2010:17.0p (2011: 15.9p; 2010: 15.0p; 2009: 15.0p; 2008: 15.0p; 2007: 13.6p)15.0p), giving a total ordinary dividend in respect of the financial year of 21.55p (2010:23.0p (2011: 21.55p; 2010: 20.4p; 2009: 20.4p; 2008: 20.3p; 2007: 18.1p)20.3p). Dividends in 2008 included a special distribution of 82.0p per ordinary share paid from the net proceeds of the sale of the Education division.

 

  Dividends per Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share in respect of the financial year ended December 31, 20112012 translated into cents at the noon buying rate on December 31, 20112012 were 33.437.3 cents. See “— Exchange Rates” on page 6.

(5)Weighted average number of shares excludes shares held in treasury and shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust. On January 7, 2008 the existing ordinary shares were consolidated into new ordinary shares on the basis of 58 new ordinary shares for every 67 existing ordinary shares. For the purposes of calculating earnings per share, the effective date of the share consolidation is deemed to be January 18, 2008, being the date on which the accompanying special distribution was paid. On July 30, 2009 Reed Elsevier PLC announced a share placing for 109,198,190 new ordinary shares, representing approximately 9.9% of the company’s share capital prior to the placing. The shares were fully subscribed at a price of 405p per share, raising £435 million, net of issue costs. This share placing was announced in conjunction with a similar share placing by Reed Elsevier NV.

During 2012, Reed Elsevier PLC repurchased 23,288,616 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

REED ELSEVIER NV

The selected financial data for Reed Elsevier NV should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV included in this annual report. The results and financial position of Reed Elsevier NV reflect the 50% economic interest of Reed Elsevier NV’s shareholders in Reed Elsevier. These interests are accounted for on an equity basis.

All of the selected financial data for Reed Elsevier NV set out below has been extracted or derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV.

 

  For the year ended December 31,   For the year ended December 31, 
  2011(3) 2011 2010 2009   2008 2007   2012(3) 2012 2011 2010 2009   2008 
  (in millions, except per share amounts)   (in millions, except per share amounts) 

Amounts in accordance with IFRS:(1)

                

Profit before tax(2)

  $609   438   379   217    313   873    $871   660   438   379   217    313  

Taxation

   (1  (1  (3  2     (19  (18   (3  (2  (1  (3  2     (19

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

   608    437    376    219     294    855     868    658    437    376    219     294  

Earnings per Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share from total operations of the combined businesses

  $0.76   0.59   0.51   0.32    0.44   1.10  

Earnings per Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share from continuing operations of the combined businesses

  $0.76   0.59   0.51   0.32    0.43   0.84  

Diluted earnings per Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share from total operations of the combined businesses

  $0.76   0.59   0.51   0.31    0.44   1.09  

Earnings per Reed Elsevier NV share from total operations of the combined businesses

  $1.19   0.90   0.59   0.51   0.32    0.44  

Earnings per Reed Elsevier NV share from continuing operations of the combined businesses

  $1.19   0.90   0.59   0.51   0.32    0.43  

Diluted earnings per Reed Elsevier NV share from total operations of the combined businesses

  $1.17   0.89   0.59   0.51   0.31    0.44  

Dividends per Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share(4)

  $0.535   0.413   0.402   0.397    2.192   0.418    $0.60   0.456   0.413   0.402   0.397    2.192  

Total assets

  $1,768   1,364   1,203   1,036    567   2,089    $1,927   1,460   1,364   1,203   1,036    567  

Total equity/Net assets

   1,683    1,303    1,137    970     491    2,016     1,851    1,402    1,303    1,137    970     491  

Weighted average number of shares(5)

   735.3    735.3    734.5    693.9     669.0    774.9     734.0    734.0    735.3    734.5    693.9     669.0  

 

(1)The consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV are prepared in accordance with accounting policies that are in conformity with IFRS as issued by the IASB and as adopted by the EU. The figures for 20082009 and 2007,2008 have been extracted or derived from the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, not included herein.

 

(2)Profit before tax includes Reed Elsevier NV’s share of post-tax earnings of joint ventures, being both the continuing and discontinued operations of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. Profit before tax in 2008 includes Reed Elsevier NV’s €11 million share of joint ventures’ post-tax gain on disposal of the educational assessment business and in 2007 the €147 million share of joint ventures’ post-tax gains on disposal of the US K-12 Schools and International educational businesses.business.

 

(3)Noon buying rates as at December 31, 20112012 have been used to provide a convenience translation into US dollars, see “— Exchange Rates” on page 6. At December 31, 20112012 the Noon Buying Rate was $1.30$1.32 per €1.00. This compares to the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of $1.39$1.29 to €1.00 applied in the translation of the combined income statement for the year.

 

(4)Dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise a 20102011 final dividend of €0.303€0.326 and 20112012 interim dividend of €0.110€0.130 giving a total of €0.413.€0.456. The directors of Reed Elsevier NV have proposed a 20112012 final dividend of €0.326 (2010:€0.337 (2011: €0.326; 2010: €0.303; 2009: €0.293; 2008: €0.290; 2007: €0.311)€0.290), giving a total ordinary dividend in respect of the financial year of €0.436 (2010:€0.467 (2011: €0.436; 2010: €0.412; 2009: €0.400; 2008: €0.404; 2007: €0.425)€0.404). Dividends in 2008 included a special distribution of €1.767 per ordinary share paid from the net proceeds of the sale of the Education division.

 

  Dividends per Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share in respect of the financial year ended December 31, 20112012 translated into dollars at the noon buying rate on December 31, 20112012 were $0.565.$0.62. See “— Exchange Rates” on page 6.

 

(5)Weighted average number of shares excludes shares held in treasury and shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust and takes into account the R shares in the company held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC, which representsrepresent a 5.8% interest in Reed Elsevier NV. On January 7, 2008 the existing ordinary shares were consolidated into new ordinary shares on the basis of 58 new ordinary shares for every 67 existing ordinary shares. For the purposes of calculating earnings per share, the effective date of the share consolidation is deemed to be January 18, 2008, being the date on which the accompanying special distribution was paid. On July 30, 2009 Reed Elsevier NV announced a share placing for 63,030,989 ordinary shares, representing approximately 9.9% of the company’s share capital prior to the placing. The shares were fully subscribed at a price of €7.08 per share, raising €441 million, net of issue costs. Correspondingly Reed Elsevier NV also issued 252,459 new R shares and transferred 135,179 existing R shares held in treasury to a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC at a price of €73.00 per share for total proceeds of €29 million. TheThis share placing was announced in conjunction with a similar share placing by Reed Elsevier PLC.

During 2012 Reed Elsevier NV repurchased 12,660,296 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and 62,341 R shares.

EXCHANGE RATES

For a discussion of the impact of currency fluctuations on Reed Elsevier’s combined results of operations and combined financial position, see “Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.

The following tables illustrate, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the Noon Buying Rate for pounds sterling expressed in US dollars per £1.00 and for the euro expressed in US dollars per €1.00. The exchange rate on February 15,27, 2012 was £1.00 = $1.57$1.51 and €1.00 = $1.31$1.31.

US dollars per £1.00 — Noon Buying Rates

 

   Period 

Year ended December 31,

  End   Average(1)   High   Low 

2011

   1.55     1.60     1.67     1.54  

2010

   1.56     1.55     1.64     1.43  

2009

   1.62     1.57     1.70     1.37  

2008

   1.45     1.85     2.03     1.44  

2007

   2.00     2.00     2.11     1.92  

Month

   High   Low 

February 2012 (through February 15, 2012)

  

   1.59     1.57  

January 2012

  

   1.58     1.53  

December 2011

  

   1.57     1.54  

November 2011

  

   1.61     1.55  

October 2011

  

   1.61     1.54  

September 2011

  

   1.62     1.54  

August 2011

  

   1.66     1.62  
   Period 

Year ended December 31,

  End   Average(1)   High   Low 

2012

   1.62     1.59     1.63     1.53  

2011

   1.55     1.60     1.67     1.54  

2010

   1.56     1.55     1.64     1.43  

2009

   1.62     1.57     1.70     1.37  

2008

   1.45     1.85     2.03     1.44  

Month

   High   Low 

February 2013 (through February 27, 2013)

  

   1.58     1.51  

January 2013

  

   1.63     1.57  

December 2012

  

   1.63     1.60  

November 2012

  

   1.61     1.58  

October 2012

  

   1.62     1.59  

September 2012

  

   1.63     1.59  

August 2012

  

   1.59     1.55  

US dollars per €1.00 — Noon Buying Rates

 

   Period 

Year ended December 31,

  End   Average(1)   High   Low 

2011

   1.30     1.39     1.49     1.29  

2010

   1.34     1.33     1.45     1.20  

2009

   1.44     1.40     1.51     1.25  

2008

   1.41     1.47     1.60     1.24  

2007

   1.47     1.37     1.49     1.29  

Month

   High   Low 

February 2012 (through February 15, 2012)

  

   1.33     1.31  

January 2012

  

   1.32     1.27  

December 2011

  

   1.35     1.29  

November 2011

  

   1.38     1.32  

October 2011

  

   1.42     1.33  

September 2011

  

   1.43     1.34  

August 2011

  

   1.45     1.42  
   Period 

Year ended December 31,

  End   Average(1)   High   Low 

2012

   1.32     1.29     1.35     1.21  

2011

   1.29     1.39     1.49     1.29  

2010

   1.33     1.32     1.45     1.20  

2009

   1.44     1.40     1.51     1.25  

2008

   1.41     1.47     1.60     1.24  

Month

   High   Low 

February 2013 (through February 27, 2013)

  

   1.37     1.31  

January 2013

  

   1.36     1.30  

December 2012

  

   1.33     1.29  

November 2012

  

   1.30     1.27  

October 2012

  

   1.31     1.29  

September 2012

  

   1.31     1.26  

August 2012

  

   1.26     1.21  

 

(1)The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each month during the relevant period.

Noon Buying Rates have not been used in the preparation of the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements, the Reed Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements or the Reed Elsevier NV consolidated financial statements but have been used for certain convenience translations where indicated.

RISK FACTORS

The key material risks to our business are included below. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business.

We operate in a highly competitive environment that is subject to rapid change.

Our businesses operate in highly competitive markets. These markets continue to change in response to technological innovations, changing legislation, regulatory changes, the entrance of new competitors, and other factors. We cannot predict with certainty the changes that may occur and the effect of those changes on the competitiveness of our businesses. In particular, the means of delivering our products and services, and the products and services themselves, may be subject to rapid technological and other changes. We cannot predict whether technological innovations, changing legislation or other factors will, in the future, make some of our products wholly or partially obsolete or less profitable. Failure to anticipate market trends could impact the competitiveness of our products and services and consequently adversely affect our revenue and profit.

We cannot assure you that there will be continued demand for our products and services.

Our businesses are dependent on the continued acceptance by our customers of our products and services and the value placed on them. We cannot predict whether there will be changes in the future, either in the market demand or from the actions of competitors, which will affect the acceptability of products, services and prices to our customers.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may affect our reported results.

Our financial statements are expressed in pounds sterling and euros and are, therefore, subject to movements in exchange rates on the translation of the financial information of businesses whose operational currencies are other than our reporting currencies. The United States is our most important market and, accordingly, significant fluctuations in US dollar exchange rates can significantly affect our reported results and financial position from year to year. In addition, in some of our businesses we incur costs in currencies other than those in which revenues are earned. The relative movements between the exchange rates in the currencies in which costs are incurred and the currencies in which revenues are earned can significantly affect the results of those businesses.

Current and future economic, political and market forces, and dislocations beyond our control may adversely affect demand for our products and services.

The demand for our products and services may be impacted by factors that are beyond our control, including macro economic, political and market conditions, the availability of short term and long term funding and capital and the level of volatility of interest rates, currency exchange rates and inflation. The United States, Europe and other major economies have recently undergone a period of severe economic turbulence, and the global economic environment has recently been less favourable than in prior years and this may continue into the future. Any one or more of these factors may contribute to reduced activity by our customers, may result in a reduction of demand for our products and services, and may adversely affect suppliers and third parties to whom we have outsourced business activities. Further disruption to global credit markets, which has significantly contributed to the recent economic turbulence described above, could have further disruptive consequences for global economic growth and customer demand.

Changes in tax laws or uncertainty over their application and interpretation may adversely affect our reported results.

Our businesses operate worldwide and our earnings are subject to taxation in many differing jurisdictions and at differing rates. We seek to organise our affairs in a tax efficient manner, taking account of the jurisdictions in which we operate. However, tax laws that apply to our businesses may be amended or interpreted differently by the relevant authorities, which could adversely affect our reported results. In addition, disputes arise from time to time with tax authorities regarding the application of tax laws to our businesses.

Changes in regulation of information collection and use could adversely affect our revenues and our costs.

Legal regulation relating to internet communications, data protection, e-commerce, direct marketing, credit scoring and digital advertising, privacy, information governance and use of public records is becoming more prevalent. Existing and proposed legislation and regulations, including changes in the manner in which such legislation and regulations are interpreted by courts, in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions may impose limits on our collection and use of certain kinds of information about individuals and our ability to communicate such information effectively with our customers. For example, many of the background screening report businessesproducts offered by LexisNexis Risk Solutions are governed by the US Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Graham Leach Bliley Act (“GLBA”), Drivers Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”) and related state laws. Certain of 1970 and analogous statethese laws requiring that consumers be provided the contents of

background reports and allowed to have any inaccuracies in the reports corrected. It further providesprovide for statutory penalties and attorneyattorneys fees for non-compliance. We are unable to predict in what form laws and regulations will be adopted or modified or how they will be construed by the courts, or the extent to which any such laws or interpretation changes might adversely affect our business.

Changes in provision of third party information to us could adversely affect our businesses.

A number of our businesses rely extensively upon content and data from external sources to maintain our databases. Data is obtained from public records, governmental authorities, customers and other information companies, including competitors. In the case of public records, including social security number data which are obtained from public authorities, our access is governed by law. We also obtain the credit header data in our databases from consumer credit reporting agencies. The disruption or loss of data sources in the future, because of changes in the law or because data suppliers decide not to supply them, could adversely affect our businesses if we were unable to arrange for substitute sources in a timely manner or at all.

Our business, operations and reputation could be adversely affected by a failure to comply with FTC Settlement Orders.

Through our LexisNexis Risk Solutions business, we are party to two consent orders and two subsequent related supplemental orders (the “FTC Settlement Orders”) embodying settlements with the US Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) that resolved FTC investigations into our compliance with federal laws governing consumer information security and related issues, including certain fraudulent data access incidents. We also entered into an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance and Discontinuance (“AVC”) with the Attorneys General of 43 states and the District of Columbia in connection with one such FTC investigation. The FTC Settlement Orders and the AVC require us to institute and maintain information security, verification, credentialing, audit and compliance, and reporting and record retention programmes and to obtain an assessment from a qualified, independent third party every two years for twenty years (with the FTC having the right to extend such twenty-year period by up to two additional biennial assessment periods) to ensure that our performance under these information security programmes complies with the FTC Settlement Orders. Failure to comply with the FTC Settlement Orders and the AVC could result in civil penalties and adversely affect our business, operations and reputation.

Breaches of our data security systems or other unauthorised access to our databases could adversely affect our business and operations.

Our businesses provide customers with access to database information such as case law, treatises, journals, and publications as well as other data. Our LexisNexis Risk Solutions business also provides authorised customers with access to public records and other information on US individuals made available in accordance with applicable privacy laws and regulations. There are persons who try to breach our data security systems or gain other unauthorised access to our databases in order to misappropriate such information for potentially fraudulent purposes and we have previously disclosed incidents of such unauthorised access. Because the techniques used by such persons change frequently, we may be unable to anticipate or protect against the threat of breaches of data security or other unauthorised access. Breaches of our data security systems or other unauthorised access to our databases could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability, as well as increase the likelihood of more extensive governmental regulation of these activities in a way that could adversely affect this aspect of our business.

Changes in government funding of, or spending by, academic institutions may adversely affect demand for the products and services of our science and medical businesses.

The principal customers for the information products and services offered by our science and medical publishing businesses are academic institutions, which fund purchases of these products and services from limited budgets that may be sensitive to changes in private and governmental sources of funding. Accordingly, any decreases in budgets of academic institutions or changes in the spending patterns of academic institutions could negatively impact our businesses.

Our intellectual property rights may not be adequately protected under current laws in some jurisdictions, which may adversely affect our results and our ability to grow.

Our products and services are largely comprised of intellectual property content delivered through a variety of media, including journals, books, compact discs, and online, including the internet. We rely on trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret and other intellectual property laws to establish and protect our proprietary rights in these products and services. However, we cannot assure you that our proprietary rights will not be challenged, limited, invalidated or circumvented. Despite trademark and copyright protection and similar intellectual property protection laws, third parties may be able to copy, infringe or otherwise profit from our proprietary rights without our authorisation. These unauthorised activities may be facilitated by the internet.

In addition, whilst there is now certain internet-specific copyright legislation in the United States and in the European Union, there remains significant uncertainty as to the date from which such legislation will be enforced and the form copyright law regulating digital content may ultimately take. In several jurisdictions, including the United States, Australia and the European Union, copyright laws are increasingly coming under legal review. These factors create additional challenges for us in protecting our proprietary rights in content delivered through the internet and electronic platforms. Moreover, whilst non-copyrightable databases are protected in many circumstances by law in the European Union, there is no equivalent legal protection in the United States.

We may be unable to implement and execute our strategic and business plans if we cannot maintain high quality management.

The implementation and execution of our strategic and business plans depend on the availability ofour ability to recruit, motivate and retain high quality people. We compete globally and across business sectors for talented management resources across alland skilled individuals, particularly those with technology and data analytics capabilities, inability to recruit, motivate or retain such people could adversely affect our businesses. We cannot predict that in the future such resources will be available.business performance.

We may not realize all of the future anticipated benefits of potential future acquisitions.

WeFrom time to time, we acquire businesses to reshape and strengthen our portfolio. Whilst our acquisitions are made within the framework of our overall strategy, which emphasizes organic development, we cannot assure you we will be able to generate the anticipated benefits such as revenue growth, synergies and/or cost savings associated with these acquisitions. Failure to realize the anticipated benefits of potential future acquisitions could adversely affect our business.return on invested capital and financial condition.

We cannot assure you whether our substantial investment in electronic product and platform initiatives will produce satisfactory, long term returns.

We are investing significant amounts to develop and promote electronic products and platforms. The provision of electronic products and services is very competitive and we may experience difficulties developing this aspect of our business due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors may include competition from comparable and new technologies and changes in regulation.

Our businesses may be adversely affected if their electronic delivery platforms, networks or distribution systems experience a significant failure or interruption.

Our businesses are increasingly dependent on electronic platforms and distribution systems, primarily the internet, for delivery of their products and services. From time to time we have experienced verifiable attacks on our platforms and systems by unauthorised parties. To date such attacks have not resulted in any material damage to us, however, our businesses could be adversely affected if their electronic delivery platforms and networks experience a significant failure, interruption or security breach.

Our businesses may be adversely affected by the failure of third parties to whom we have outsourced business activities.

We engage in outsourcingOur organisational and offshoring activities such as IT, productionoperational structures have increased dependency on outsourced and development engineering.offshored functions. Poor performance or the failure of third parties to whom we have outsourced business functions could adversely affect our business performance, reputation and financial condition.

Our scientific, technical and medical primary publications could be adversely affected by changes in the market.

Our scientific, technical and medical (STM)(“STM”) primary publications, like those of most of our competitors, are published on a paid subscription basis. There is continuous debate in government, academic and library communities, which are the principal customers for our STM publications, regarding whether such publications should be free and funded instead through fees charged to authors and from governmental and other subsidies or made freely available after a period following publication. If these methods of STM publishing are widely adopted or mandated, it could adversely affect our revenue from our paid subscription publications.

Spending by companies on advertising and other marketing activities, which comprises a significant portion of our revenue, has historically been cyclical.

Approximately 7%In 2012 6% of our revenue in 2011 was derived from advertising and 12%14% from exhibitions. In Reed Business Information, 38%30% of revenue was derived from advertising in 20112012 compared with 41%37% in 2010.2011. Total advertising revenues for our businesses in 20112012 were £437£350 million compared with £491£437 million in the prior year.2011.

Traditionally, spending by companies on advertising and other marketing activities has been cyclical, with companies spending significantly less on advertising in times of economic slowdown or turbulence. In addition, there has been a structural shift of advertising and lead generation to Google and other search engines.

The exhibitions business is similarly affected by cyclical pressures on spending by companies. Additionally, participation and attendance at exhibitions is affected by the availability of exhibition venues and the propensity of exhibitors and attendees to travel. Our results could be adversely affected if the availability of venues or the demand from exhibitors and attendees were reduced, for example due to international security or public health concerns or acts of terrorism or war.

Changes in the market values of defined benefit pension scheme assets and in the assumptions used to value defined benefit pension scheme obligations may adversely affect our businesses.

We operate a number of pension schemes around the world,world. Historically, the largest schemes beinghave been of the defined benefit type in the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands. The assets and obligations associated with defined benefit pension schemes are particularly sensitive to changes in the market values of assets and the market related assumptions used to value scheme liabilities. In particular, a decrease in theadverse changes to asset values, discount rate used to value scheme liabilities, anrates or inflation could increase in life expectancy of scheme members, an increase in the rate of inflation or a decline in the market value of investments held by the defined benefitfuture pension schemes (absent any change in their expected long term rate of return) could adversely affect the reported resultscosts and financial position of the combined businesses.funding requirements.

Our impairment analysis of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets incorporates various assumptions which are highly judgemental. If these assumptions are not realised, we may be required to recognise a charge in the future for impairment.

As at December 31, 2011,2012, goodwill on the combined statement of financial position amounted to £4,729£4,545 million and intangible assets with an indefinite life amounted to £370£354 million. We conduct an impairment test at least annually, which involves a comparison of the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets by cash generating unit with estimated values in use based on latest management cash flow projections. The assumptions used in the estimation of value in use are, by their very nature, highly judgemental, and include profit growth of the business over a five year forecast period, the long term growth rate of the business thereafter, and related discount rates. There is no guarantee that our businesses will be able to achieve the forecasted results which have been included in the impairment tests and impairment charges may be required in future periods if we are unable to meet these assumptions.

Our borrowing costs and access to capital may be adversely affected if the credit ratings assigned to our debt are downgraded.

Our outstanding debt instruments are, and any of our future debt instruments may be, publicly rated by independent rating agencies such as Moody’s Investors Service Inc., Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and Fitch Ratings. A rating is based upon information furnished by us or obtained by the relevant rating agency from its own sources and is subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal by the rating agency at any time. Rating agencies may review the assigned ratings due to developments that are beyond our control. Factors cited as a basis for a ratings downgrade or an assignment of a negative outlook could include the macro economic environment and the level of our indebtedness as a consequence of an acquisition. If the ratings of our debt are downgraded in the future, our borrowing costs and access to capital may be adversely affected.

Breaches of generally accepted ethical business standards or applicable statutes concerning bribery could adversely affect our reputation and financial condition.

As a leading global provider of professional information solutions to the Science, Medical, Risk, Legalscience, medical, risk, legal and Businessbusiness sectors, we are expected to adhere to high standards of independence and ethical conduct. Whilst our employees are expected to abide by the Reed Elsevier Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, employees may still fail to abide by its guidelines relating to anti-bribery and principled business conduct. Similarly, whilst our major suppliers are expected to abide by our Supplier Code of Conduct, suppliers may still fail to abide by its guideline relating to anti-bribery and principled business conduct. A breach of generally accepted principled business standards or applicable statues concerning bribery by our employees or our suppliers could adversely affect our business performance, reputation and financial condition.

Failure to manage our environmental impact could adversely affect our businesses.

Our businesses have an impact on the environment, principally through the use of energy and water, waste generation and, in our supply chain, through our paper use and print and production technologies. Whilst we are committed to reducing these impacts by limiting resource use and by efficiently employing sustainable materials and technologies, we cannot assure you that these efforts and expenditures incurred by us in order to comply with either new environmental legislation and regulations, new interpretations or existing laws and regulations or more rigorous enforcement of such laws and regulations will not adversely impact on our businesses or reputation.

ITEM 4: INFORMATION ON REED ELSEVIER

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

Corporate structure

Reed Elsevier came into existence in January 1993, when Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV contributed their respective businesses to two jointly-owned companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc, a UK registered company which owns the publishing and information businesses, and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, a Dutch registered company which owns the financing activities. Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have retained their separate legal and national identities and are publicly held companies. Reed Elsevier PLC’s securities are listed in London and New York, and Reed Elsevier NV’s securities are listed in Amsterdam and New York.

Equalisation arrangements

Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV each hold a 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc. Reed Elsevier PLC holds a 39% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV, with Reed Elsevier NV holding a 61% interest. Reed Elsevier PLC additionally holds a 5.8% indirect equity interest in Reed Elsevier NV, reflecting the arrangements entered into between the two companies at the time of the merger, which determined the equalisation ratio whereby one Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share is, in broad terms, intended to confer equivalent economic interests to 1.538 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares. The equalisation ratio is subject to change to reflect share splits and similar events that affect the number of outstanding ordinary shares of either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV.

Under the equalisation arrangements, Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders have a 52.9% economic interest in Reed Elsevier, and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders (other than Reed Elsevier PLC) have a 47.1% economic interest in Reed Elsevier. Holders of ordinary shares in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV enjoy substantially equivalent dividend and capital rights with respect to their ordinary shares.

The Boards of both Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have agreed, other than in special circumstances, to recommend equivalent gross dividends (including, with respect to the dividend on Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares, the associated UK tax credit), based on the equalisation ratio. A Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share pays dividends in sterling and is subject to UK tax law with respect to dividend and capital rights. A Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share pays dividends in euros and is subject to Dutch tax law with respect to dividend and capital rights.

The principal assets of Reed Elsevier PLC comprise its 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc, its 39% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV, its indirect equity interest in Reed Elsevier NV and certain amounts receivable from subsidiaries of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The principal assets of Reed Elsevier NV comprise its 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc, its 61% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV and certain amounts receivable from subsidiaries of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV.plc. Reed Elsevier NV also owns shares, carrying special dividend rights, in Reed Elsevier Overseas BV, a Dutch registered subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc. These shares enable Reed Elsevier NV to receive dividends from companies within its tax jurisdiction, thereby mitigating Reed Elsevier’s potential tax costs.

Material acquisitions and disposals

Total acquisition expenditure in the three years ended December 31, 2011,2012, including the buy out of non controllingnon-controlling interests, was £594£924 million, net of cash acquired. During 2012, a number of acquisitions were made for total consideration of £341 million, net of cash acquired of £12 million. During 2011, a number of acquisitions, including the buy out of non controllingnon-controlling interests, were made for a total consideration of £540 million, net of cash acquired of £24 million. The most significant of these was Accuity Inc., a leading provider of data in credit risk, regulatory compliance and online payment systems, acquired in November 2011 for cash consideration of £331 million, net of cash acquired. During 2010, a number of small acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £43 million. During 2009 a number

Gross cash proceeds from disposals amounted to £242 million (2011: £101 million; 2010: £66 million), including £7 million from the sale of small acquisitions were made for a total considerationnon-controlling interests. Net cash proceeds, before tax, amounted to £160 million (2011: £80 million; 2010: £6 million), after related separation and transaction costs, additional pension scheme contributions, and working capital and other adjustments in respect of £11 million.prior year transactions.

Restructuring

In February 2008 we announced a major restructuring plan to further consolidate and streamline operational activities and back office support. In 2009, having identified further restructuring and consolidation opportunities, we announced an expansion of this programme and a major restructuring in Reed Business Information. Restructuring costs incurred in 2011 were nil (2010: £57 million; 2009: £182 million; 2008: £152 million).

Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure on property, plant, equipment and internally developed intangible assets principally relates to investment in systems infrastructure to support electronic publishing activities, computer equipment and office facilities. Total such capital expenditure, which iswas financed from operating cash flows, amounted to £350£333 million in 2011 (2010:2012 (2011: £350 million; 2010: £311 million; 2009: £242 million) of the combined businesses.. In 20112012, there was continued investment in new product and related infrastructure, particularly in LexisNexis Legal & Professional.Legal. Further information on capital expenditure is given in notes 16 and 18 to the combined financial statements.

Principal Executive Offices

The principal executive offices of Reed Elsevier PLC are located at 1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5JR, England. Tel: +44 20 7930 7077.7166 5500. The principal executive offices of Reed Elsevier NV are located at Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tel: +31 20 485 2222. The principal executive office located in the United States is at 125 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York, 10017. TelTel: +1 212 309 5498. Our internet address is www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Reed Elsevier is a world leading provider of professional information solutions organised in 2011 as five businessoperating across several market segments: Elsevier,Scientific, Technical & Medical, providing information and tools to help its customers improve scientific technical and medical information solutions; LexisNexishealthcare outcomes; Risk Solutions, providing risktools that combine proprietary, public and third-party information, with advanced technology and analytics to business and government customers; LexisNexis Legal & Professional, providing legal, tax, regulatory and business information solutions to professionals, business and government customers; Reed Exhibitions, organising trade exhibitions and conferences; and Reedanalytics; Business Information, providing data services, information and marketing solutions to business professionals.

With effect from 1 January 2011 LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutionsprofessionals; Legal, providing legal, tax, regulatory news and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately.business information to legal, corporate, government, and academic markets; and Exhibitions, organising exhibitions and conferences.

Our principal operations are in North America and Europe. For the year ended December 31, 20112012 we had total revenue of approximately £6.0£6.1 billion and an average of approximately 30,60030,500 employees. As at December 31, 20112012 we had approximately 30,50030,400 employees. In 2011,2012, North America represented our largest single geographic market, based on revenue by destination, contributing 54%52% of our total revenue.

Revenue is derived principally from subscriptions, circulation and transactional sales, exhibition fees and advertising sales and exhibition fees.sales. In 2011, 47%2012, 49% of Reed Elsevier’s revenue was derived from subscriptions; 27%26% from circulation and transactional sales; 12%14% from exhibition fees; 7%6% from advertising sales; and 7%5% from other sources. An increasing proportion of revenue is derived from electronic information products, principally internet based. In 2011, 63%2012, 64% of our revenue was derived from such sources, including 96% of LexisNexis Risk Solutions revenue, 75%76% of LexisNexis Legal revenue, 68% of Scientific, Technical & ProfessionalMedical revenue, 63%54% of Elsevier revenue, 51% of Reed Business Information revenue, and 2% of Reed Exhibitions revenue.

Subscription sales are defined as revenue derived from the periodic distribution or update of a product or from the provision of access to online services, which is often prepaid. Circulation and transactional sales include all other revenue from the distribution of a product and transactional sales of online services, usually on cash or credit terms. The level of publishing related advertising sales and exhibition fees has historically been tied closely to the economic and business investment cycle with changes in the profit performance of advertisers, business confidence and other economic factors having a high correlation with changes in the size of the market. Subscription sales and circulation and transactional sales have tended to be more stable than advertising sales through economic cycles.

Revenue is recognised for the various categories as follows: subscriptions — on periodic despatch of subscribed product or rateably over the period of the subscription where performance is not measurable by despatch; circulation and transactional — on despatch or occurrence of the transaction; exhibitions — on occurrence of the exhibition and advertising — on publication or period of online display; and exhibitions — on occurrence of the exhibition.display. Where sales consist of two or more independent components whose value can be reliably measured, revenue is recognised on each component as it is completed by performance, based on the attribution of relative value.

Certain of our businesses are seasonal in nature. In Elsevier, a significant proportion of annual revenue is derived from calendar year based journal subscriptions, with the substantial majority of annual cash inflow from these arising in the fourth quarter of each financial year. The majority of medical publishing and sales arise in the second half of the year. This, together with the phasing of other subscription receipts and exhibition deposits, results in significant cash flow seasonality whereby the substantial majority of annual operating cash inflows normally arise in the second half of the year.

Our businesses compete for subscription, circulation and transaction, and marketing expenditures in scientific and medical, risk, legal and business sectors. The bases of competition include, for readers and users of the information, the quality and variety of the editorial content and data, the quality of the software to derive added value from the information, the timeliness and the price of the products and, for advertisers, the quality and the size of the audiences targeted.

 

   Revenue
Year ended December 31,
 
   2011  2010  2009 
   (in millions, except percentages) 

Elsevier

  £2,058     34 £2,026     34 £1,985     33

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   908     15    927     15    865     14  

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   1,634     27    1,691     28    1,692     28  

Reed Exhibitions

   707     12    693     11    638     11  

Reed Business Information

   695     12    718     12    891     14  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  £6,002     100 £6,055     100 £6,071     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Revenue
Year ended December 31,
 
   2012  2011  2010 
   (in millions, except percentages) 

Scientific, Technical & Medical

  £2,063     34 £2,058     34 £2,026     34

Risk Solutions

   926     15    908     15    927     15  

Business Information

   663     11    695     12    718     12  

Legal

   1,610     26    1,634     27    1,691     28  

Exhibitions

   854     14    707     12    693     11  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  £6,116     100 £6,002     100 £6,055     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

ELSEVIERSCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

      

Elsevier

      

Science & Technology

  £1,076    £1,015    £985  

Health Sciences

   982     1,011     1,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  £2,058    £2,026    £1,985  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £2,063    £2,058    £2,026  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In Scientific, Technical & Medical markets, we provide information and tools to help customers improve scientific and healthcare outcomes.

Elsevier is a leading provider of scientific, technical and medical information and serves scientists, health professionals and students worldwide. Its objective is to help its customers advance science and improve healthcare by providing world class information and innovative information solutions that enable customersthem to make critical decisions, enhance productivity and improve outcomes.

Elsevier is a global business with principal operations in Amsterdam, Beijing, Boston, Chennai, Delhi, London, Madrid, Milan, Munich, New York, Oxford, Paris, Philadelphia, Rio de Janeiro, St. Louis, San Diego, Singapore and Tokyo. ElsevierIt has 6,9007,000 employees.

Elsevier is organised around two market-facing businesses: Science & Technology, which serves the scientificneeds of the science, technology and technology communities,health markets by publishing primary research, reference, and Health Sciences, which serves the health community. Botheducation content, as well as by providing a range of these businesses are supported by a global shared services organisation which provides integrated editorial systems and production services, product platforms, distribution, and other support functions.

Science & Technology

Science & Technology is a leading scientific information provider. It delivers a wide array of informationdatabase and workflow tools that help researchers generate valuable insights in the advancement of scientific discovery and improve the productivity of research. Itssolutions. Elsevier’s customers are scientists, academic institutions, research leaders and administrators, medical researchers, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and students, as well as hospitals, research institutions, health insurers, managed healthcare organisations, research-intensive corporations, and governments whichgovernments. All of these customers rely on Elsevier to:to provide high quality content;content and critical information for making scientific and medical decisions; to review, publish, disseminate and preserve research findings; andto create innovative tools to help focus research strategies, increase research effectiveness, improve medical outcomes, and improve their effectiveness.enhance the efficiency of healthcare and healthcare education.

The Science & Technology division contributed 52%In 2012, approximately 65% of the total Elsevier revenue in 2011. Of this revenue, 77% came from research (journals), 9%subscription sales, 27% from reference education (books)circulation and 14%transactional sales, 3% from databasesadvertising, and tools.the remaining 5% from other sources. Approximately 34%40% of Science & Technology revenue by destination in 20112012 was derived from North America, 34%31% from Europe and the remaining 32%29% from the rest of the world. 68% of revenues were delivered electronically.

In the primary research market during 2012, over 1 million research papers were submitted to Elsevier, publishes over 240,000 new science & technology researcha double digit increase on the prior year. Over 10,000 editors managed the peer review and selection of these papers, resulting in the publication of more than 330,000 articles each year through some 1,250in almost 2000 journals, many of which are the foremost publications in their field and a primary point of reference for new research. The vast majorityThis content was accessed by around 11 million people, with nearly 700 million full text article downloads last year. Content is provided free or at very low cost in most of customers receive thesethe world’s poorest countries. Elsevier’s journals are primarily published and delivered through theScienceDirect, aplatform, the world’s largest database of scientific and medical research, providing accesshosting over 11 million articles, and over 11,000 full-text e-books. Flagship journals includeCellandThe Lancetfamilies of titles. Elsevier continuously innovates to over 10 millionimprove the utility and effectiveness of its journals. For example, its “Article of the Future” enhances the traditional scientific paper with new and medical journal articles, used by over 7 million researchers each year.broader types of content, such as links to experimental data, related content, and enhanced media to supplement the article’s text.

Elsevier is also a global leader in the scientific, technical and medical reference market, providing authoritative and current professional reference content. While reference has traditionally been a print industry, Elsevier has been a leader in driving the shift from print to electronic. Elsevier publishes over 70020,000 reference titles, with 1,400 new English language science & technology book titles published annually along with supporting bibliographic data, indexesindices and abstracts, abstracts. Approximately 85% of these titles are available electronically. Flagship titles include works such asGray’s Anatomy,Nelson’s PediatricsandNetter’s Atlas of Human Anatomy.

Elsevier launchedClinicalKeyin 2012, a product that allows physicians to access the leading reference and evidence-based medicine content in a single, fully-integrated site.ClinicalKeyincludes a full taxonomy and improved smart content search to help clinicians look up detailed information on highly specific topics as they seek to answer clinical questions. The platform covers Elsevier’s as well as relevant third-party health content.ClinicalKeyhas already been deployed at leading teaching hospitals, such as Oxford University’s John Radcliffe, the Cleveland Clinic, and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

In medical education, Elsevier serves students of medicine, nursing and allied health professions through print and electronic books, as well as electronic solutions. For example, itsEvolveportal provides a rich resource to support faculty and students and now has over 3.5 million registered users;Evolve Reachprovides online review and reference works. 15,000testing tools for nursing and the allied health professions;Evolve Teach provides online books are available onScienceDirect, with over 1,000 online books added each year.resources and solutions to support faculty.

Elsevier’s database and workflow products provide a range of tools and solutions for professionals in the science, technical, and medical fields. Customers include academic and corporate researchers, research administrators and healthcare professionals.

Other majorFor academic and corporate researchers, significant products includeScopus,Geofacets, andReaxys. Reaxys.Scopusis the largest abstract and citation database of research literature in the world, with abstracts and bibliographic information on more than 45almost 50 million scientific research articles from 19,00019,500 peer reviewed journals and over 5,000 international publishers.ScopusGeofacetsalso has data on more than 24 million patents.is an oil and gas exploration tool which packages research-relevant Elsevier and third-party geological content and tags that content to enable rich search functionality.Reaxysis a leading solution for synthetic chemists, that integratesintegrating chemical reaction and compound data searching with synthesis planning.

In December 2011,2012, Elsevier acquiredAriadne GenomicsKnovel, a web-based provider of pathway analysisproductivity tools and semantic technologies for life science researchers which will complement Elsevier’s efforts to serve the needs of researchers in the pharma biotech sector.

A major challenge facing researchers and institutions is the ever growing amount of research and relatedengineering community, integrating technical information with the limited timeanalytics and search to identifydeliver trusted answers and analyse what is most relevant. To address this challenge, Elsevier has been developing a suite of new products that significantly improve the speed at which researchers are able to find the most relevant information and analyse this information using the most innovative applications.SciVerse Hubprovides a single search interface for accessingScienceDirect,Scopusand scientific web content. In addition,SciVerse Application Marketplace & Developer Networkenables researchers and third party developers to build customised applications on top of Elsevier’s information and other data and analytics enhancing the utility of the underlying content.drive innovation.

Following a successful collaboration since 2007, Elsevier acquired QUOSA in January 2012. QUOSA’s technological capabilities will raise the efficiency of the search and discovery process and will also allow researchers to manage information more efficiently.

Elsevier is continuing to develop theserves academic and government research administrators through itsSciValsuite of products that help academic and government institutionsthem evaluate their institutions’ research performance, determine research strategies and increase institutional efficiencies. Leveraging bibliometric data, such as citations fromScopus,SciVal Spotlighthelps institutions and governments to identify their distinctive research strengths, evaluate performance and increase the focus of their research and development (“R&D”) investments.SciVal Fundingassists researchers and institutions in identifying grants that are most relevant in their research areas.SciVal Experts enables researchers to establish a directory of experts in their area of interest, whileSciVal Strata facilitates performance benchmarking by research teams.

In August 2012, Elsevier bolstered its research management portfolio by acquiringHealth SciencesAtira

Health Sciences is, a leading medical information provider. Through its medical journals, books, major reference works, databasesprovider of software and online information tools Elsevier provides critical informationthat complement theSciValplatform and analysis on which its customers rely to basehelp academic institutions and researchers improve their decisions, to improve medical outcomes and enhance the efficiency of healthcare. Health Sciences serves medical researchers, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and students, as well as hospitals, research institutions, health insurers, managed healthcare organisations and pharmaceutical companies.

Health Sciences contributed approximately 48% of the total Elsevier revenue in 2011. This revenue came from five sectors: global medical research; clinical reference/clinical decision support; nursing/health professional education; global pharma promotion; and international (other), each of which contribute approximately 20% to revenue. Approximately 52% of Health Sciences revenue by destination in 2011 was derived from North America, 27% from Europe and the remaining 21% from the rest of the world.

Elsevier publishes over 700 health sciences journals, including on behalf of learned societies, and, in 2011, 1,500 new health sciences book titles and clinical reference works were published both in print and throughScienceDirectand other electronic platforms such asMD Consult. MD Consultis a leading online clinical information service with more than 2,400 institutional customers. Flagship titles include market leading medical journals such asThe Lancet, and major medical reference works such asGray’s Anatomy,Nelson’s PediatricsandNetter’s Atlas of Human Anatomy. In addition to its local language publishing in many countries across the world, Health Sciences leverages its content and solutions into new markets through local language versioning. In November 2011,ClinicalKeywas launched in beta allowing physicians to access the leading reference and evidence-based medicine in a single, fully-integrated site built to accommodate their clinical information workflows.outcomes.

For healthcare professionals, Elsevier is a leader in medical education and training resources, particularly to the nursing and allied health professions. From print and electronic books to virtual clinical patient care, Health Sciences supports students, teaching faculties and healthcare organisations in education and practice. A strong focus is on the further development of innovative electronic services: theEvolveportal provides a rich resource to support faculty and students and now has 3 million registered users;EvolveReach (Health Education Systems Inc.)provides online review and testing tools for nursing and the allied health professionals;Evolve Teachprovides online resources and solutions to support faculty.

A growing area of focus is clinical decision support, providing online information and analyticsdevelops products to deliver patient-specific solutions at the point of care to improve patient outcomes. Its clinical solutions includeGold Standard, which provides critical information on drug interactions to assist effective treatment;treatment, andCPM Resource Center, which provides a data drivendata-driven framework to support nurses in undertaking procedures;Nursing Consult provides nursing care guidelinesprocedures.

Elsevier further bolstered its clinical solutions portfolio with the acquisition in traumaSeptember 2012 ofExitCare, a provider of patient education and disease management;discharge instructions.MEDaiExitCare’suses patient data and analytics to help identify areas for improvement in clinical practice within hospitals and lower costs for the payers of healthcare through preventative interventions. In February 2011, Elsevier entered the emergingproducts, incorporated into Elsevier’s clinical decision support market in China throughcontent and tools, will help healthcare providers improve the acquisitiondelivery of Datong, a leading online provider of drug information that helps Chinese hospitals to improve quality of care through better drug usage.

Elsevier also provides services to the pharmaceutical industry through advertising and sponsored communications to the specialist community it serves. In 2011, Elsevier continued the restructuring of this business focusing more on the services which leverage Health Sciences’ corehealthcare information and distribution platform.

Shared Servicesservices across all care environments.

The shared service functions provide production, information technology, customer service, fulfilment and distribution for both the Science & Technology and Health Sciences divisions. Much of the pre-press production for journals and books is outsourced.

Market Opportunities

The science and medicalScientific, Technical & Medical information markets have good long termlong-term demand growth characteristics. The importance of research and development to economic performance and competitive positioning is well understood by governments, academic institutions and corporations. This is reflected in the long termlong-term growth in R&Dresearch and development spend and in the number of researchers worldwide, leading to greater research output and publishing. Additionally, thereworldwide.

Growth in health markets is growing demand for tools that allow research to better target and improve the spend and efficiency of the research process.

In health, market growth is also supporteddriven by demographic trends, with ageing populations that require more healthcare,in developed markets, rising prosperity in developing economies with increasing expectations of better healthcare provision,markets and the increasing focus on improving medical outcomes and efficiency.

Given that a significant portionproportion of scientific research and healthcare is funded directly or indirectly by governments, spending is influenced by governmental budgetary considerations. The commitment to research and health provision does, however, generally remain high, even in more difficult budgetary environments.

Strategic Priorities

Elsevier’s strategic goal is to make valued contributions to the communities it serves in advancingprovide information solutions that advance science improving medical outcomes and enhancing productivity.improve health. To achieve this, Elsevier is focused on: building world-class content; deepeningcreates solutions that reflect deep insight into the way its customer engagementusers work and the outcomes they are seeking to identify how betterachieve; drives for excellence in content, service and technology; constantly adapts and revitalises its products, solutions and business models; and leverages its shared resources and knowledge to help them achieve their desired outcomes more efficientlypromote innovation, efficiency and effectively; delivering tools which link, analyseexcellence in execution.

For academic and illuminate content and data to help customers make critical decisions and improve their productivity; increasing its investment in high-growth markets and disciplines; and continuously improving organisational efficiency.

In Science & Technology,corporate researchers, priorities are to continually enhancecontinue to strengthen journal brands and the quality of published articles, and to further improve scientific communication and user experience with our journal content. Elsevier is focused on delivering journal content quickly, making it available through different access channels, and exploring a range of innovative new business models. Elsevier will also build new services, and add greater functionality and utility to existing solutions to improve researcher productivity.

For science and health professionals, priorities are to continue enhancing the quality and relevance of research and referenceour content and expand data sets,our workflow tools, while adding greater functionality and utility toSciVerse,ScienceDirect,Scopusand new tools to assist researcher productivity. TheSciValsuite of performance and planning tools will continue to be expanded to help academic and government institutions target their research spend and improve research efficiency and economic outcomes.

In Health Sciences, priorities are to continue to enhance the quality and relevance of its content and actively managemanaging the ongoing format shift from print to electronic information consumption by developing improved electronic solutions that add more valueinformation.

For students, priorities are to its users and customers. Additionally, Health Sciences continuescontinue to build out clinical decision support services to meet customer demand for tools that deliver better medical outcomes and lowers costs for payers, physicians and hospitals. Elsevier is also focused on increasing growth in emerging markets through expansion of local publishing and versioning ofprovide the highest quality educational content and electronic services.tools and to develop an even better customer experience. In addition, Elsevier will develop tools to track student performance, train new faculty members, and improve the effectiveness of existing faculty staff.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

Science and medical research is principally disseminated on a paid subscription basis to the research facilities of academic institutions, government and corporations, and, in the case of medical and healthcare journals, also to individual practitioners and medical society members. AdvertisingFor a number of journals, advertising and promotional income represents a small proportion of revenues are derivedpredominantly from pharmaceutical companies in healthcare titles.

Over the past 15 years alternative payment models for the dissemination of research such as so-called “author-pays open access” or “author’s-funder-pays” have emerged. While it is expected that paid subscription will remain the primary distribution model, Elsevier has long invested in alternate business models to address the needs of customers and other companies. researchers. Over 1,500 of Elsevier’s journals now offer the option of funding research publishing and distribution via a sponsored article fee. In addition, Elsevier now publishes around 30 “author-pays” journals.

Electronic products, such asScienceDirect,ScopusandMD ConsultClinicalKey, are generally sold direct to customers through a dedicated sales force that has offices around the world. Subscription agents facilitate the sales and administrative process for print journals. Books are sold through traditional and online book stores, wholesalers and, particularly in medical and healthcare markets, directly to end users.

Competition within science and medical publishing is generally on a title by titletitle-by-title and product by productproduct-by-product basis. Competing journals, books and databases are typically published by learned societies and other professional publishers. Workflow tools face similar competition as well as from software companies and internal solutions developed by customers.

Major Brands

Elsevier is the master brand used for both the Science & Technology and Health Sciences businesses.business.

Elsevier’s major brands include:Cell, a life sciences journal in cellbiochemistry and molecular biology; andThe Lancet, one of the leading medical journals since 1823. Many other products and journals are major brands in their fields, including:Scopus, a scientific abstract and citation database;SciVal, a suite of funding intelligence and research performance tools for academic institutions;Reaxys®, a web-based chemical reaction workflow solution for industrial chemists;institutions and funding intelligence;pharmapendium, access to history of drug development through a unique online platform;MDConsult, an online drugs safety database that supports drug development researchers;ClinicalKey,combines reference and evidence-based medical content into its fully-integrated clinical information service, including reference works, journalsinsight engine;Geofacets,an extensive database of georeferenced geological maps;ScienceDirect,the world’s largest database of scientific and drug information;medical research articles; andMosby’s Nursing ConsultCPM CarePoints,, online evidence-based contenta comprehensive care planning and clinical documentation system.

RISK SOLUTIONS & BUSINESS INFORMATION

In Risk Solutions & Business Information, we provide data, analytics and insight that enable customers to inform nursing clinicalevaluate and manage risks, and develop market intelligence, supporting more confident decisions, at the point of care;Evolve, integrated, online resources that complement Elsevier’s nursing textbook content;improved economic outcomes, andMEDai, a clinical decision support tool to identify areas for improvement in medical practice.

enhanced operational efficiency.

LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £908    £927    £865  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £926    £908    £927  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LexisNexis Risk Solutions is a leading provider of solutions that combine proprietary, public and third-party information, analyticswith advanced technology and advanced technology.analytics. These solutions assist customers in evaluating, predicting and managing risk and improving operational effectiveness, predominantly in the US.

With effect from 1 January 2011 LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia, and has principal operations in Georgia, Florida, and Ohio, and has 4,0004,100 employees.

In 2011,2012, approximately 85%86% of LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ revenue came from circulation and transactional sales, 12%11% from subscription sales, and the remaining 3% from other sources. 96% of LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ revenue is delivered electronically.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions is organised around market facing industry/sector groups: insurance, government, screening, and business services (including the financial services, receivables management financial services and corporate groups), and government. The most significant of which insurancethese is the most significant.insurance. These groups are supported by a shared infrastructure providingfor technology operations, data management, and other support functions including compliance and marketing. A number of transactional support activities, including some financial processes, are provided from a shared services organisation managed by the LexisNexis Legal & Professional business. The LexisNexis Legal & Professional business also distributes LexisNexis Risk Solutions products into legal markets in the US and internationally.

Insurance Solutions provides the mosta comprehensive combination of data and analytics to property and casualty (P&C) personal and commercial insurance and life insurance carriers in the US to improve critical aspects of their business, from customer acquisition and underwriting to policy servicing and claims handling. Information solutions, including the US’s most comprehensive personal loss history database,C.L.U.E., help insurers assess risks and provide important inputs to pricing and underwriting policy. Recently introducedinsurance policies. Additional key products includeData PreFillPrefill, which provides accuratecritical information directly into the insurance workflow on customers, potential customers and their auto ownership directly into the insurance workflow, andCurrent Carrier, which identifies current or previous insurance as well as any lapses in coverage.

Business Services provides financial institutions with risk management, identity verification,management, fraud detection, credit risk management, and compliance solutions. These include “know your customer” and anti-money laundering products. The business also provides risk and identity management solutions for corporate customers in retail, telecommunications and utilities sectors. Receivables management solutions helpshelp debt recovery professionals in the segmentation, management and collection of consumer and business debt. The LexisNexis Risk Solutions business also provides identity verification and risk related information to the legal industry.

Government solutionsSolutions provides investigative solutionsdata and analytics to US federal, state and local law enforcement and government agencies to help solve criminal and intelligence cases and to identify fraud, waste and abuse in government programmes.

Screening Solutions focuses on employment-related, resident and volunteer screening, with the largest segment being pre-employment screening services offered across a number of industries including retail, recruitment, banking, and professional services.

During 2011, LexisNexisThe Risk Solutions sharpened its focus on its data and analytics activities withbusiness also provides risk-related information to the sale of the insurance software business, while Reed Elsevier’s acquisition ofAccuity complements and enhanceslegal industry through LexisNexis Legal & Professional.

Risk Solutions offerings in anti-money laundering. There has also been a continuedcontinues to focus on developing a pipeline of new solutions forto drive growth in selected adjacent markets sectors and geographies. For example, in the UK, Risk Solutions has launched a new product that uses public information to help insurers assess and segment risk more effectively among motor insurance customers and is planning to launch additional innovative products to facilitate sharing of data across motor insurers, improving insurers’ ability to understand underwriting risks. In the government segment, customers are adopting fraud detection, waste, and abuse solutions, which enable government agencies to identify incidences of tax and benefits fraud, and boost revenue collections. Risk Solutions has also continued to broaden its portfolio of identity management solutions, including one-time-password and biometric solutions, and has made existing identity products more configurable to address the specific needs of customers across our market segments.

The identity verification and risk evaluation solutions provided by LexisNexis Risk Solutions utilise a comprehensive database of public records and proprietary information with more than 2,000 terabytes of unique data, which ismakes it the largest database of its kind in the US market today.LexisNexis Accurintis thea flagship identity verification product, powered by the High Performance Cluster Computing (HPCC) technology. This market-leading technology enables Risk Solutions to provide its customers with highly relevant search results swiftly and to create new, low-cost solutions quickly and efficiently. It is also increasingly used across other Reed Elsevier markets such as Legal and Scientific, Technical & Medical.

In 2011, LexisNexisJanuary 2013, Risk Solutions launched an open-source initiative called HPCC Systemsannounced the sale of its Screening business. This will allow it to broaden usage, tap the innovation of the development communityincrease its focus on higher-growth segments leveraging its core data, technology and analytical capabilities. The Screening business presented limited opportunities to more fully compete in the “big data” market. Responseapply these capabilities to date has been positive, with press articles, website traffic, speaking invitations,generate unique customer value, sustained growth, and source code downloads all ahead of expectations.superior margins.

Market Opportunities

LexisNexis Risk Solutions operates in markets with strong long termlong-term underlying growth drivers:drivers including: insurance underwriting transactions; insurance, healthcare, tax and entitlement fraud; credit defaults and financial fraud; regulatory compliance and due diligence requirements surrounding customer enrolment and employment;enrolment; and security considerations.

In the insurance segment, growth is supported by increasing transactional activity in the auto, property and propertylife insurance markets and the increasing adoption by insurance carriers of more sophisticated data and analytics in the prospecting, underwriting and claims evaluation processes, to determine appropriateassess underwriting risk, pricing, increase competitiveness and improve operating cost efficiency. Transactional activity is driven by the levels ofproduct extensions across insurance quotingcarriers’ workflow and switchinggrowth in insurance quoting, as consumers seek better policy terms,terms. This activity is stimulated by increasing competition between insurance companies, high levels of carrier advertising, and rising levels of internet quoting and policy binding.

In screening, demand is driven mainly by employer hiring activity and, in receivables management, by levels of consumer debt and the prospects of recovering those debts. Both of these markets are linked to employment conditions in the US. A number of factors support growth for LexisNexis Risk Solutionsrisk solutions in the financial services market, including new credit originations, continued high fraud losses, stringent regulatory compliance requirements and increasing anti-money laundering fines. In receivables management, demand is driven mainly by levels of consumer debt and the prospect of recovering that debt, which is impacted by employment conditions in the US. In corporate markets, demand is supported by growth in online retail sales and continued high levels of credit card fraud. Growth in government markets is driven by the increasing use of data and analytics to combat criminal activity, fraud, and fraud,tax evasion and to address security issues. The level and timing of demand in this market is influenced by government funding and revenue considerations.

Strategic Priorities

LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ strategic goal is to make businesses and government more effective, through a better understanding of the risks associated with individuals, other businesses and transactions and by providing the tools to help manage those risks.risks efficiently and cost effectively. To achieve this, LexisNexis Risk Solutions is focused on: expanding the range ofdelivering innovative new products across customer workflows; leveraging our advanced technology capabilities; delivering innovative new products and expanding the range of risk management solutions across adjacent markets; and addressing international opportunities in selected markets to meet local risk management needs.needs; and continuing to strengthen its content, technology and analytical capabilities.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

LexisNexis Risk SolutionsSolutions’ products are predominantly sold directly, with pricing mostly on a transactional basis directly tofor insurance carriers and corporations, and primarily on a subscription basis tofor government entities. LexisNexis

Risk Solutions and Verisk, a competitor, each sell data and analytics solutions to insurance carriers but largely address different activities. LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ principal competitors in commercial and government sectors include Thomson Reuters and major credit bureaus. Major competitorsbureaus, in pre-employment screening are Altegrity and First Advantage.many cases addressing different activities in these sectors as well.

Major Brands

LexisNexis is the master brand used by LexisNexis Risk Solutions.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ major brands include:C.L.U.E.®, a comprehensive US personal insurance claims database;LexisNexis®Data Prefill, a tooltools to automate the insurance application process providing critical information insurers need to quote and underwrite a policy;LexisNexis® Insurance Exchange, a platform for sharing of customer application data designed to improve and enhance flow of application data and documents;Accurint® for Collections, a US solution to help locate debtors quickly and accurately; Accurint® LE Plus, an integrated suite of tools for US law enforcement investigators;LexisNexis® Identity Management, a range of solutions to help clients verify that an identity exists and authenticate individuals;LexisNexis® Anti-Money Laundering Solutions, content and information for anti-money laundering compliance, risk mitigation and enhanced due diligence;LexisNexis® Employment ScreeningCurrent Carrier,,database that identifies the existence of current or previous insurance, and whether or not the applicant has had a US providerpossible lapse in coverage;LexisNexis® RiskView,comprehensive suite of pre-employment screening solutions;credit risk management tools to help assess consumer creditworthiness and risk potential; andLexisNexis® Resident ScreeningRevenue Recovery and Discovery,a suite of tools to enable governments to leverage public records and analytics to identify instances of fraud and to more efficiently collect on outstanding debts.

BUSINESS INFORMATION

   Year ended December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £663    £695    £718  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Business Information (“RBI”) provides data services, information and marketing solutions to business professionals across industries globally. It produces industry critical data services and lead generation tools, online community sites as well as business magazines with market leading positions in many sectors.

Approximately 27% of Business Information revenue in 2012 came from North America, 19% from the United Kingdom, 39% from Continental Europe and 15% from the rest of the world.

RBI is a global business headquartered in Sutton in the UK and in addition has principal operations in London, Amsterdam, Skokie (Illinois), Norcross (Georgia) and Boston (Massachusetts) in the US, as well as Paris, Milan and Shanghai. RBI has 4,800 employees worldwide.

RBI’s customers use its data services to help make key strategic decisions and reduce risk, to improve productivity and performance and identify new business opportunities. RBI’s magazines and websites deliver high value news, information and opinion to business professionals across many industry sectors while also providing an effective marketing channel for customers. RBI’s online marketing solutions bring buyers and sellers together through a range of innovative digital channels.

RBI’s market leading data services include:ICIS, an information and pricing service in chemicals, fertilisers and energy;BankersAccuity, a comprehensive US multi-family housing screeningprovider of payment routing data, anti-money laundering (AML) services and collections service.compliance information to the banking and corporate sectors;XpertHR, an online service providing regulatory guidance, best practices and tools for HR professionals; andReed Construction Data, a provider of online construction data and information to the construction industry.

LEXISNEXIS RBI’s leading brands includeNew Scientist,Farmers Weekly,Estates Gazette,Elseviermagazine andBoerderij. Online marketing solutions includeemedia, an email bulletin based lead generation service andBuyerZone, a web-based request for quotation (RFQ) service.

In 2012, RBI continued to reshape its portfolio significantly, addressing continued growth opportunities in data services while exiting areas not core to its paid content strategy. In addition, the business continued to focus on cost efficiency across the traditional publishing businesses.

As part of this strategy RBI sold Totaljobs Group, comprising seven recruitment job boards, created organically by RBI. RBI continued to create value from its existing magazine brands, while exiting a number of titles includingVariety, the entertainment market title in the US, and those in the electronics and catering markets in the UK. In January 2013, RBI announced that it had completed the sale of RBI Australia. RBI is in a process to exit its operations in Spain.

Market Opportunities

The growing need for high quality industry data and information is driving demand for online subscription data services and providing new opportunities. Business-to-business marketing spend has historically been driven by levels of corporate profitability, which itself has followed GDP growth, and business investment.

Strategic Priorities

RBI’s strategic goal is to help business professionals achieve better outcomes with information and decision support in its individual markets. Its areas of strategic focus are: further growing the data services businesses; restructuring the business magazines and advertising-driven portfolio; developing paid content services in key markets and supporting print franchises through brand extensions and redesign; and driving further organisational effectiveness.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

Across the RBI portfolio, user and subscription revenues now account for 69% of the total business with the remaining 31% derived from print and online advertising and lead generation. RBI electronic revenue streams now account for 54% of total revenue.

Data services are typically sold directly on a subscription or transactional basis. Business magazines are mainly distributed on a paid basis. Advertising and lead generation revenues are sold directly or through agents.

RBI’s data services and titles compete with a number of publishers on a service and title-by-title basis including: UBM, McGraw Hill and Wolters Kluwer as well as many niche and privately-owned competitors. RBI competes for online advertising with other business-to-business websites as well as Google and other search engines.

Major Brands

RBI’s major brands include:ICIS,a global provider of news, price benchmarks, data, analytics and research to the energy, chemical and fertiliser industries;Reed Construction Data,a provider of actionable insight for the construction industry through cost data, project leads, market intelligence and marketing solutions;NewScientist,a science and technology media brand;Flightglobal,data, news and advisory services for professionals working in the global aviation industry;XpertHR,online services with reference data, compliance information and good practice guides for HR professionals;Elsevier,news and opinion service in the Netherlands;BankersAccuity,payment routing data, AML services and compliance tools for the banking and corporate sectors worldwide;estatesgazette,news, data and research services for the UK commercial property industry; andemedia,digital lead generation services in the US, UK and Europe.

LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £1,634    £1,691    £1,692  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £1,610    £1,634    £1,691  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LexisNexisIn Legal & Professional ismarkets, we are a leading provider of contentlegal, regulatory and news & business information solutions forand analysis to legal, corporate, government, and other corporate markets. academic customers.

Serving customers in more than 100175 countries, LexisNexis Legal & Professional provides resources and services that inform decisions, increase productivity and drive new business.

With effect from 1 January 2011 LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional is headquartered in New York and has principal operations in the New York area, Ohio and New JerseyNorth Carolina in the United States, Toronto in Canada, London and Paris in Europe, Canada, and cities in several other countries in Africa and Asia Pacific. It has 10,30010,400 employees worldwide.

In 2011,2012, approximately 70%74% of LexisNexis Legal & Professional’sLegal’s revenue came from subscription sales, 8%13% from circulation and transactional sales, 6%5% from advertising, including directory listings, and the remaining 16%8% from other sources. Approximately 68% of Legal & Professional’sLegal’s revenue by destination in 20112012 was derived from North America, 21% from Europe and the remaining 11% from the rest of the world. 75%76% of LexisNexis Legal & Professional’sLegal’s revenues were delivered electronically.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional is organised throughin market facing businesses, thegroups. The most significant of which are Research & Litigation Solutions and Business of Law Software Solutions in the US and LexisNexis Europe, Middle East, Africa & AustralasiaInternational and LexisNexis Asia (together reported as International) outside the US. These are supported by global shared services organisations providing platform and product development, operational and distribution services, and other support functions.

LexisNexis LegalIn Research & Professional is a leading provider of legal and business information and analysis to law firms, corporations and government throughout the US. ElectronicLitigation Solutions, electronic information solutions and innovative workflow tools, developed through close collaboration with customers, help law firms and other legal and business professionals make better informed decisions in the practice of law and in managing their businesses.

In Research & Litigation Solutions, the flagship Flagship products for legal research areLexis.comandLexis Advance, which provide federal and state statutes and case law, together with analysis and expert commentaries from sources such asMatthew BenderandMichieand the leading citation serviceShepard’s, which advises on the continuing relevance of case law precedents. Research solutions also include news and business information, ranging from daily news to company filings, as well as public records information and analytics. Through its suite of litigation services,solutions, LexisNexis Legal & Professional additionally provides lawyers with a suite of tools for electronic discovery, evidence management,covering case analysis, court docket tracking, e-filing, expert witness identificationpreparation to processing and legal documentreview to trial preparation. LexisNexis Legal & Professional also partners with law schools to provide services to students as part of their training.

In December 2011,2012, LexisNexis Legal & Professional releasedintroduced in the US the next iterationtwo new releases ofLexis Advance, an innovative web application designed to transform how legal professionals conduct research. Built on an advanced technology platform,Lexis Advanceallows primary researchers within legal and professional organisations to find highly relevant information more easily and efficiently, helping them to drive better outcomes. The release is the next step in a series ofLexis Advancelaunches with futureFuture releases continuingwill continue to expand available content and add new innovative tools. LexisNexis Legal & Professional employs lawyers and trained editors with professional legal backgrounds who review, annotate and update the legal content to help ensure each document in itsthe collection is current and linked to other related documents.comprehensive. This domain expertise combined with the application of Reed Elsevier’s “big data” HPCC technology means LexisNexis Legal & Professional is able to update its entire legal collection faster and more efficiently, while also identifying and linking content, thereby uncoveringenabling customers to uncover previously undiscovered relationships between documents.

InLexisNexis launchedLexis Practice Advisorin the US in 2011,2012, a web-based practical guidance product tailored for attorneys who handle transactional matters. Additionally, LexisNexis Legal & Professional launchedintroduced a legal news solution through the acquisition ofLaw360— providing attorneys with breaking news and analysis by practice area to supplement the legal research process.

In litigation solutions, LexisNexis Firm ManagerreleasedHosted Concordance Evolution,which is a fully hosted service that delivers electronic discovery review capabilities on an online legal“on-demand” basis.Sanction Solutionswas also acquired, adding trial presentation software to the LexisNexis suite of litigation offerings.

The web-based marketing services group assists law firms in their client development throughlawyers.com and providing them with website development, search engine optimisation and other web marketing services.

LexisNexis Business of Law Software Solutions provides law firms with practice management applicationsolutions, including time and billing systems, case management, cost recovery and document management services.

In International markets outside the United States, LexisNexis serves legal, corporate, government, accounting and academic markets in Europe, Canada, Africa and Asia Pacific with local and international legal, regulatory and business information. The most significant businesses are in the UK, France, Australia, Canada, and South Africa.

LexisNexis focuses on providing customers with leading collections of content and innovative online solutions to help legal and business professionals make better decisions more efficiently. Penetration of online information services has grown strongly and electronic solutions now account for solo practitioners58% of revenue outside the US.

In the UK, LexisNexis is a leading legal information provider offering an unrivalled collection of primary and smallsecondary legislation, case law, practices. Among other expert commentary, and forms and precedents. Its extensive portfolio includes a number of heritage brands:Halsbury’s,Tolleys,Butterworths. The content is delivered through multiple formats — from print to online, to mobile apps and embedded in customers’ workflow.

In 2012, LexisNexis launched additional modules of theLexisPSLproduct releases, LexisNexis Legal & Professional also releasedEarly Data Analyzersuite which provides lawyers a single destination for their practical legal information needs with early insight intodirect links to the sizerelevant cases, legislation, precedents, forms, practical guidance and scopeexpert commentary. The ability to drive measurable customer value was recognised by the British Legal Awards which has named LexisNexis UK ‘2012 Supplier of discoverythe Year’ for its innovation, authority and an updated versionunderstanding of law firms’ needs. A similar service is being launched across other markets — Australia already has 13 practice area modules and by the end of next year it will have more.

In France, LexisNexis is a leading online provider of information to lawyers, notaries and courts. A heritage brandJurisClasseurand leading authoritative content is provided through multiple formats — lexisnexis.fr, mobile and in print. These content sources are, as in the UK, being combined with new content and innovative workflow tools to develop practical guidance and practice management solutions. In 2012, LexisNexis France launchedLexis 360, the first semantic search online tool combining legal information, practical content and results from the web.

Following the success ofLexis for Microsoft Office which(LMO) in US markets, a Canadian version was launched in 2012. LMO enables lawyerscustomers to conduct their Lexis searchesaccess LexisNexis content and services via add-ins/toolbars within Microsoft applications such as Word and Outlook.

In 2011, LexisNexis Legal & Professional rationalised its electronic discovery offerings and divested the Applied Discovery business.

Business Solutions provides law firms with practice management solutions, including time and billing systems, case management, cost recovery and document management services. LexisNexis Legal & Professional assists law firms in their client development throughLawyers.com, showcasing the qualifications and credentials of more than one million lawyers and law firms in the US and internationally, and providing law firms with website development, search engine optimisation and other web marketing services.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional also provides its legal and information services to US government, corporate and academic customers, including news and business information and public records. In addition to research and litigation services, capabilities for these customers include specialist products for corporate counsel focused on regulatory compliance, intellectual property management, and management of external counsel.

In International markets outside the United States, LexisNexis Legal & Professional serves legal, corporate, government and academic markets in Europe, Canada, Africa and Asia Pacific with local and international legal, tax, regulatory and business information. The most significant businesses are in the UK, France, Australia and Canada.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional is focused across all its geographies on leveraging best in class content and its market leading international online product platform to deliver innovative electronic information services and workflow tools to help legal and business professionals make better informed decisions more efficiently. Penetration of online information services is growing and print based products now account for less than 40% of LexisNexis Legal & Professional total revenues outside the US.

In the UK, LexisNexis Legal & Professional is a leading legal information provider in its market. It delivers a wide array of content and services, comprising an unrivalled collection of primary and secondary legislation, case law, expert commentary, and forms and precedents. Its extensive portfolio includesHalsbury’s Laws of England, Simon’s TaxesandButterworths Company Law Servicedelivered through the UK’s flagship online productLexisLibraryand in print. Other electronic products includeLexis Legal Intelligence, a resource on legal practice for lawyers, and media monitoring and reputation management tools for the corporate market such as theNexisDirectresearch tool. Additionally, LexisNexis Legal & Professional provides law firms with practice management solutions.

In France, LexisNexis Legal & Professional is a provider of information to lawyers, notaries and courts withJurisClasseurandLa Semaine Juridiquebeing the principal publications, delivered throughlexisnexis.frand in print. These content sources are, as in the UK, being combined with new content and innovative workflow tools to develop practical guidance and practice management solutions.

In international markets in 2011, LexisNexis Legal & Professional continued to roll outLegal Intelligence. Designed to match the way lawyers work,Lexis Legal Intelligenceprovides primary law, practical guidance, learning and productivity tools in one place. It reduces the time it takes to get the answers and documents lawyers need, helping to make practice more effective. In the UK, the practical guidance serviceLexisPSLnow has 13 practice areas including company, commercial, corporate, banking and finance, and will expand again in 2012. A similar service has been launched in Australia, with five practice areas in 2011. In France, LexisNexis Legal & Professional is completing the development ofLexis360, an innovative solution for legal professionals that combines semantic and federated search capabilities with practical guidance, legal concept navigation and brand-leadingJurisClasseurcontent.

In 2011,2012, LexisNexis Legal & Professional strengthened its positionpositions in key emerging markets including India. LexisNexis Legal & Professional released an initial version ofLexis India, an online legal research platformAsia through enhanced products created specifically for the legal professionals and practitioners, corporate counsels, legal researchers academics and government institutions in India.markets including India, China and Japan. In Japan, LexisNexis launchedLexis AS ONE, a product created specifically for corporate compliance and legal professionals to help navigate the complex regulatory environment.

Market Opportunities

Longer term growth in legal and regulatory markets worldwide is driven by increasing levels of legislation, regulation, regulatory complexity and litigation, and an increasing number of lawyers. Additional market opportunities are presented by the increasing demand for online information solutions and practice management tools that improve the quality and productivity of research, deliver better legal outcomes, and improve business performance. Notwithstanding this, legal activity and legal information markets are also influenced by economic conditions and corporate activity, as has been seen most recently with the dampening impact on demand of the recent global recession and the somewhat subdued environment that has followed in North America and in Europe.

Strategic Priorities

LexisNexis Legal & Professional’s strategic goal is to enable better legal outcomes and be the leading provider of productivity enhancing information and information-based workflow solutions in its markets. To achieve this LexisNexis is focused on: building world class content; developingon introducing next generation product platforms, tools and infrastructure to deliver best-in-class outcomes for legal and business professionals with greater speed and efficiency; building client development and practice management tools enabling customers to be more successful in their markets; international expansion and growth of online products and solutions; increasing LexisNexis Legal & Professional’s presence in emerging markets;solutions on the global New Lexis platform and infrastructure; leveraging New Lexis globally to continue to drive print to electronic migration and long-term international growth; and upgrading operational infrastructure, improving operational efficiency.process efficiency and gradually improving margins.

In the US, theLexisNexis’ focus is on the continuing development of the next generation of legal research and practice solutions as well assolutions. It is also conducting a major upgrade in operations infrastructure and customer service and support platforms toplatforms. This will provide customers with an integrated and superior customer experience across US legal research, litigation services, practice management and client development. ProgressiveOver the next few years progressive product introductions, often based on the New Lexis Advanceplatform, over the next few yearsleveraging big data HPCC technology, will combine advanced technology with enriched content, sophisticated analytics and applications to enable LexisNexis Legal & Professional’sLexisNexis’ customers to make better legal decisions and drive better outcomes for their organizationsorganisations and clients.

Outside the US, LexisNexis Legal & Professional is focused on growing online services and developing further high quality actionable content and workflow tools, including the development of practical guidance and practice management applications. In 2013, LexisNexis will begin to introduceNew Lexis globally. Additionally, LexisNexis is focusing on the expansion of its activities in emerging markets.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

LexisNexis Legal & Professional products and services are generally sold directly to law firms and to corporate, government, accounting and academic customers on a paid subscription basis, with subscriptions with law firms often under multi-year contracts.

Principal competitors for LexisNexis in US legal markets are West (Thomson Reuters), CCH (Wolters Kluwer) and Bloomberg,, and Bloomberg and Factiva (News Corporation) in news and business information. Competitors in litigation solutions also include software companies. MajorSignificant international competitors include Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer and Factiva.

Major Brands

LexisNexis is the master brand used by LexisNexis Legal & Professional.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional’s major brands include:Lexis®, legal, news and public records content for legal professionals;Nexis®,news and business content for legal and other professionals;Matthew Bender®, critical legal analysis, checklists, forms, and practice guides authored by industry experts covering 50 major practice areas;CaseMap®, software allowing litigators to assess and analyse case information;Lexis® for Microsoft® Office, an integration of LexisNexis content, open Web search and Microsoft Office;LexisNexis® Verdict & Settlement Analyzer®, an early case assessment tool for researching and evaluating the risk and opportunity associated with a case;lawyers.comSM, a website for consumers seeking legal information and counsel;Lexis®Library, LexisNexis UK flagship legal online product;Lexis®PSL, LexisNexis UK legal practical guidance

service; andJurisClasseur, an authoritative online legal resource in France.France;Shepard’s®, a citation service;Lexis Advance, a new online legal research tool that transforms the way legal professionals conduct research; andLexis® Practice Advisor, a new resource that offers guidance to help attorneys handle transactional matters more efficiently and effectively.

REED EXHIBITIONS

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £707    £693    £638  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2012   2011   2010 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £854    £707    £693  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In Exhibitions we are a leading events business, with almost 500 events in over 30 countries.

Reed Exhibitions’ portfolio of exhibitions and conferences serves 44 industry sectors across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. In 20112012, Reed Exhibitions brought together over six6 million event participants from around the world, generating billions of dollars in business for its customers.customers, and boosting the local economies where the events are hosted.

Reed Exhibitions is a global business headquartered in London and has principal offices in Paris, Vienna, Norwalk (Connecticut), São Paulo, Abu Dhabi, Beijing, Tokyo Sydney and São Paulo.Sydney. Reed Exhibitions has 2,8003,200 employees worldwide.

Over 70% of Reed Exhibitions’ revenue is derived from exhibitor participation fees, with the balance primarily comprising of conference fees, online and offline advertising, in exhibition guides, sponsorship fees and admission charges. In 2011,2012, approximately 18%15% of Reed Exhibitions’ revenue came from North America, 52%50% from Europe and the remaining 30%35% from the rest of the world on an event location basis.

Reed Exhibitions organises market leading events thatwhich are relevant to industry needs, where participants from around the world come togethermeet face to face to do business, to network and to learn. Its exhibitions and conferences encompass a wide range of sectors, including: broadcasting, TV, music & entertainment; building & construction;sectors. They include construction, electronics, & electrical engineering;energy and alternative energy, oil & gas; engineering, entertainment, gifts and jewellery, healthcare, hospitality, interior design, logistics, manufacturing, & processing; gifts; interior design; IT & telecoms; jewellery; life sciences & pharmaceuticals; marketing; property &pharmaceuticals, real estate; sports & recreation;estate, recreation, security and safety, transport and travel.

In January 2012 Reed Exhibitions took full ownership of our joint venture Alcantara Machado, Brazil’s leading exhibition organiser.

Market Opportunities

Growth in the exhibitions market is correlated to business to businessinfluenced by both business-to-business marketing spend historicallyand business investment. Historically, these have been driven by levels of corporate profitability, which itselfin turn has followed overall growth in gross domestic product (“GDP”), and business investment.GDP. Emerging markets and growth industries provide additional opportunities. As some events are held other than annually, growth in any one year is affected by the cycle of non-annual exhibitions.

Strategic Priorities

Reed Exhibitions’ strategic goal is to provide market leadingmarket-leading events in growth sectors, especially in higher growth geographies, that enable businessesenabling exhibitors to target and reach new customers quickly and cost effectivelycost-effectively and to provideproviding a platform for industry participants to do business, to network and to learn. To achieve this, Reed Exhibitions is focused on:on driving organic growth by leveraging its global sector groupsexpertise, by developing new events and by building out its technology platforms, developingplatforms. It is also shaping the portfolio through a combination of new launches, strategic partnerships and selective acquisitions in high growth sectors and geographies; and further developing websites, analytics and other online tools to enhance the exhibition experience and add to customer return on investment in event participation.

In 2011, at a portfolio level, this strategy delivered 43 new events in high growth sectors such as the gift and home industry in China, incentive travel in the USA, and smart grids in Japan and Singapore,geographies as well as further acquisitions to build out our position in Brazil, enter Mexicowithdrawal from markets and Morocco and increase our exposure to the renewable energy industry in the UK. In terms of systems and customer experience, industries with lower growth prospects.

Reed Exhibitions has continuedis committed to invest in developing itscontinually improving customer solutions and experience by implementing best practice initiatives across geographies and sectors. Its integrated web event web platform which is now used by more than 70%70 per cent of events and is driving both customer satisfaction and insight. Using customer insights, Reed Exhibitions has developed an innovative product offering which enhances the value proposition for exhibitors by broadening their options in terms of the type and location of stand they take and the timing of their commitment to the event.

In 2012 Reed Exhibitions launched 30 new events. These included events which extended the geographical footprint of the luxury travel brand, ILTM, to Mexico and the high end Privé jewellery brand to Panama. Reed Exhibitions Japan responded to customer demand by introducing several new events, some of which were in the fast moving sectors of cosmetics and high-technology plastics. In China, the Nepcon brand was used to launch an electronics manufacturing event in the western city of Chengdu. A key element of building business in China and Brazil is a regional strategy, taking more events to China’s second tier cities and cloning events from São Paulo to Recife in Brazil’s fast developing north east. Reed Exhibitions now organises over 150 events in emerging markets.

A number of targeted acquisitions were completed during 2012. In Brazil, Reed Exhibitions took full ownership of its joint venture, Reed Exhibitions Alcantara Machado, and expanded into hospitality (Equipotel) and logistics (Movimat), cementing Reed Exhibitions’ position as the leading exhibition organizer in Brazil. Elsewhere, acquisitions were made to extend Reed Exhibitions’ reach in China and its global position in the alternative energy sector. During the year, Reed Exhibitions also established positions in new markets with attractive growth prospects, including Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, where a joint venture has been created with Tüyap, the country’s leading event organiser.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

The substantial majority of Reed Exhibitions’ revenues are from sales of exhibition space. The balance includes conference fees, online and offline advertising, in exhibition guides, sponsorship fees and, for some shows, admission charges. Exhibition space is sold directly or through local agents where applicable. Reed Exhibitions often works in collaboration with trade associations, which use the events to promote access for members to domestic and export markets, and with governments, for whom events can provide important support to stimulate foreign investment and promote regional and national enterprise.

Reed Exhibitions operatesis the global market leader in a fragmented industry, holding less than a 10%10 per cent global market share. Other international exhibition organisers include UBM, Informa IIR and some of the larger German Messe, including Messe Frankfurt, Messe DusseldorfDüsseldorf and Messe Munich. Competition also comes from industry trade associations and convention centre and exhibition hall owners.

Major Brands

Reed Exhibitions’ major brands include:Mipcom®, a leading entertainment content market;World Travel Market®, a global event for the travel industry;Mipim®,a global event for the property industry;Mecanica,Automec,an international machinery trade fair;JCK Las Vegas, a North American jewellery industry trade event;WorldFuture Energy Summit, a platformfair for sustainable future energy solutions;autoparts, equipment and services;Equip’hotel Paris,Batimat®,the international building exhibition;New York ComicCon,an event for the restaurant, hotel, café and catering industries;East Coast popular-culture convention;In-cosmeticsSino Corrugated,, a corrugated manufacturing show;ISC West,an international exhibition for personal care ingredients;security conference; andGifts & HomeAluminum China,, a leading business gifts & home fair in China.

REED BUSINESS INFORMATION

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Revenue

  £695    £718    £891  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Business Information (“RBI”) provides data services, information and marketing solutionsbringing aluminium to business professionals in the UK, the US, Continental Europe, Asia and Australia. It produces industry critical data services and lead generation tools, online community and job sites as well as business magazines with market leading positions in many sectors.

Approximately 24% of RBI revenue in 2011 came from North America, 23% from the United Kingdom, 39% from Continental Europe and 14% from the rest of the world.

RBI is a global business headquartered in Sutton in the UK and has principal operations in Amsterdam in the Netherlands, Boston, Los Angeles, Skokie (Illinois) and Norcross (Georgia) in the US as well as Paris, Milan, Madrid, Bilbao, Sydney and Shanghai. RBI has 5,600 employees worldwide.

RBI’s data services enable businesses and professionals to enhance productivity through quicker and easier access to insightful and comprehensive industry information. Online marketing solutions, business to business magazines, online lead generation services and community websites provide effective marketing channels for advertisers to reach target audiences and for industry professionals to access valued information.

RBI’s market leading data services include:ICIS, a global information and pricing service for the petrochemicals and energy sector;BankersAccuity(previouslyBankers’ Almanac andAccuity), a leading provider of reference data on the banking industry;XpertHR, an online service providing human resources data, regulatory guidance, best practices and tools for HR professionals; andReed Construction Data, a provider of online construction data to the North American construction industry. The major online marketing solutions include:totaljobs.com, a major UK online recruitment site; andHotfrog, a global online business directory. Premier publishing brands includeVarietyin the US,New Scientistin the UK and theElseviermagazine in the Netherlands.

In 2011, RBI continued to significantly reshape its portfolio, addressing continued growth opportunities in data services and the accelerated migration of customer marketing spend to web media while managing value from the remaining print businesses. During the year RBI expanded the data services businesses with three significant acquisitions. In January 2011, RBI completed the transaction to take majority ownership ofCBI China, a market leading petrochemical and energy information service in China, bringing unrivalled coverage of the important and growing Chinese and Asian chemicals and energy markets, strengtheningICIS’sglobal position. In June 2011, RBI acquiredAscend,a provider of online fleet data and

valuations to the aviation industry, complementing RBI’s existing data and content services and the aerospace platform,Flightglobal. In November 2011, RBI completed the acquisition of Accuity Inc. for a total cost of £331 million, net of cash acquired.Accuityis a US provider of online subscription-based data solutions for the financial services industry which enable customers to maximise the accuracy of their banking and payment transactions, and to minimise the risk of non-compliance with government regulations in these transactions.Accuityis being integrated withRBI’s Bankers’ Almanac, to formBankersAccuity, establishing a global standard for payment efficiency and compliance solutions.

RBI continued to create value from its existing magazine brands, while exiting a number of titles including those in the computing, social care and road transport markets in the UK and the construction market in the Netherlands. RBI also sold the UK QSS magazine subscription fulfilment business during the course of the year.

Market Opportunities

The growing need for authoritative industry data and information is driving demand for online subscription data services and providing new opportunities. Business to business marketing spend has historically been driven by levels of corporate profitability, which itself has followed GDP growth, and business investment.

Strategic Priorities

RBI’s strategic goal is to help business professionals achieve better outcomes with information and decision support in its individual markets. Its areas of strategic focus are: further growing the data services businesses; restructuring the business magazines and advertising driven portfolio, to develop online services in key markets and support print franchises through brand extensions and redesign; and to realign the cost base with revenue expectations and drive further organisational effectiveness.

Business Model, Distribution Channels and Competition

Across the RBI portfolio, user and subscription revenues now account for 62% of the total business with the remaining 38% derived from print and online advertising and lead generation. RBI electronic revenue streams now account for 51% of total revenue.

Data services are typically sold directly on a subscription or transactional basis. Business magazines are distributed on a paid or controlled circulation basis. Advertising and lead generation revenues are sold directly or through agents.

RBI’s data services and titles compete with a number of publishers on a service and title by title basis including: UBM, McGraw Hill and Wolters Kluwer as well as many niche and privately owned competitors. RBI competes for online advertising with other business to business websites as well as Monster, Google and other search engines.

Major Brands

RBI’s major brands include:ICIS, a global provider of news and pricing data to the chemical and energy industries;BankersAccuity, a supplier of banking intelligence to the global financial industry;XpertHR, an HR legal compliance and good practice toolkit;Ascend,online aircraft and engine data;totaljobs.com, a UK generalist website attracting over 3.7 million jobseekers and carrying over 125,000 jobs every month;Reed Construction Data, construction data, building product information, cost data, market analysis and advertising channels to construction industry professionals;Variety, the premier source of entertainment business news and analysis since 1905;Elsevier, a news and opinion magazine in the Netherlands; andNew Scientist, a leading science and technology media brand.life.

ELSEVIER REED FINANCE BV

Elsevier Reed Finance BV, the Dutch parent company of the Elsevier Reed Finance BV group (“ERF”), is directly owned by Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. ERF provides treasury, finance, intellectual property and reinsurance services to the Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses through its subsidiaries in Switzerland: Elsevier Finance SA (“EFSA”), Reed Elsevier Properties SA (“EPSA”REPSA”) and Elsevier Risks SA (“ERSA”). These three Swiss companies are organised under one Swiss holding company, which is in turn owned by Elsevier Reed Finance BV.

EFSA is the principal treasury centre for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. It is responsible for all aspects of treasury advice and support for Reed Elsevier Group plc’s businesses operating in Continental Europe, Latin America, the Pacific Rim, India, China and certain other territories, and undertakes foreign exchange and derivatives dealing services for the whole of Reed Elsevier. EFSA also arranges or directly provides Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses with financing for acquisitions, product development and other general requirements and manages cash pools, investments and debt programmes on their behalf.

EPSAREPSA owns and actively manages intellectual property assets including trademarks such asThe Lancetand databases such asReaxysandPharmaPendium. In 20112012 it continued to strengthen its position as a centre of excellence in the management, development and developmentbranding of intellectual property assets. ERSA is responsible for reinsurance activities for Reed Elsevier.

In 2011,2012, EFSA was active in arranging the financing and foreign currency contracts for Reed Elsevier Group plc companies related to cross border dividends and acquisitions. EFSA issued €550 million of term debt in September 2012, the proceeds of which pre-financed EFSA’s €600 million term debt maturing in April 2013. It negotiated and advised Reed Elsevier Group plc companies on a number of banking and cash management arrangements in Continental Europe and Asia and continued to advise on treasury matters, including interest rate, foreign currency and certain other financial exposures.

The average balance of cash under management by EFSA in 2011,2012, on behalf of Reed Elsevier Group plc and its parent companies, was approximately $0.8$0.5 billion (2010:(2011: $0.8 billion).

At December 31, 2011,2012, 82% (2011: 91% (2010: 84%) of ERF’s gross assets were held in US dollars and 17% (2011: 9% (2010: 15%) in euros, including $8.6$8.4 billion (2010: $8.7(2011: $8.6 billion) and €0.6 billion (2010:(2011: €0.6 billion) in loans to Reed Elsevier Group plc subsidiaries. Loans made to Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses are funded from equity, long term debt of $2$2.6 billion and short term debt of $0.5$0.2 billion backed by committed bank facilities. Sources of long term debt include Swiss domestic public bonds, bilateral term loans, private placements and syndicated bank facilities. Short term debt is primarily derived from euro and US commercial paper programmes.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Certain of our businesses provide authorised customers with products and services such as access to public records and other information on US individuals. Our businesses that provide such products and services are subject to applicable privacy and consumer information laws and US federal and state and EU and member state regulation. Our compliance obligations vary from regulator to regulator, and include, among other things, strict data security programs, submissions of regulatory reports, providing consumers with certain notices and correcting inaccuracies in applicable reports. We are also subject to the terms of consent decrees and other settlements with certain regulators in the U.S. See “Item 8: Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” on page 70.68.

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syrian Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”), which added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires disclosures regarding certain activities relating to Iran or with persons designated pursuant to various U.S. Presidential Executive Orders. These disclosures are required even where the activities, transactions or dealings were conducted in compliance with applicable law. During 2012, Sepahan Oil Company, Zagros Petrochemical Company and Petroleum Marketing Department (Sytrol) subscribed to ourICIS price reports relating to the global petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets. Our gross revenues invoiced in 2012 from these subscriptions were approximately £33,000 (thirty-three thousand pounds sterling). We do not normally allocate net profit on a country-by-country or publication-by-publication basis. However, we estimate that our net profit from such sales, after internal cost allocation, amounted to less than 0.004% of our net profit reported in our combined income statement for the year ended December 31, 2012. In addition, during 2012 we processed subscription refundsrelating toICISand BankersAlmanac products of approximately £41,000 (forty-one thousand pounds sterling) to Pars Oil Company, Parsian Bank, Real Estate Bank and Syria International Islamic Bank. We believe these transactions and dealings were lawful under applicable laws and regulations, and anticipate that similar transactions or dealings may occur in the future.

ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE

A description of the corporate structure is included under “— History and Development” on page 11. A list of significant subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and business units is included as an exhibit, see “Item 19: Exhibits” on page S-3.pages S-3 and S-4.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We own or lease approximately 280 properties around the world, the majority of leased space being in the United States. The table below identifies the principal owned and leased properties which we use in our business.

 

Location

  

Business segment(s)

  

Principal use(s)

  Floor space
(square feet)
 

Owned properties

      

Alpharetta, Georgia

  LexisNexisRisk Solutions and Legal  Office and data centre   406,000  

Miamisburg, Ohio

  LexisNexisRisk Solutions and Legal  Office   403,638  

Linn, Missouri

  Elsevier

Scientific, Technical & Medical

  Warehouse   236,105  

Albany, New York

  LexisNexisRisk Solutions and Legal  Office   194,780  

Colorado Springs, Colorado

LexisNexisOffice181,197

Binghamton, New York

  LexisNexisRisk Solutions and Legal  Office and warehouse   162,000  

Leased properties

      

New York, New York

  Reed Business Information and ElsevierScientific, Technical & Medical  Office   451,800  

Amsterdam, Netherlands

  Reed Business Information and ElsevierScientific, Technical & Medical  Office   426,036  

Miamisburg, Ohio

  LexisNexisRisk Solutions, Legal and ElsevierScientific, Technical & Medical  Office and data centre   213,802  

Sutton, England

  Reed Business Information and Legal  Office   191,960  

 

All of the above properties are substantially occupied by Reed Elsevier businesses with the exception of the New York and Colorado Springs properties,property, where Reed Elsevier occupies less than half of the floor space.

No property owned or leased by Reed Elsevier which is considered material to Reed Elsevier taken as a whole is presently subject to liabilities relating to environmental regulations and none has major encumbrances.

ITEM 5: OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

OPERATING RESULTS — REED ELSEVIER

The following discussion is based on the combined financial statements of Reed Elsevier for the three years ended December 31, 20112012 which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). and as adopted by the European Union.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, the combined financial statements.

Reed Elsevier derives its revenue principally from subscriptions, circulation and transactional sales, advertising sales and exhibition fees.

Revenue by type

Year ended December 31,

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 
  (in millions, except percentages)   (in millions, except percentages) 

Subscriptions

  £2,819     47 £2,709     45 £2,711     45  £2,978     49 £2,819     47 £2,709     45

Circulation/transactions

   1,649     27    1,760     29    1,708     28     1,602     26    1,649     27    1,760     29  

Exhibitions

   700     12    675     11    626     10     846     14    700     12    675     11  

Advertising

   437     7    491     8    585     10     350     6    437     7    491     8  

Other

   397     7    420     7    441     7     340     5    397     7    420     7  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  £6,002     100 £6,055     100 £6,071     100  £6,116     100 £6,002     100 £6,055     100
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Revenue by geographic market

Year ended December 31,

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 
  (in millions, except percentages)   (in millions, except percentages) 

North America

  £3,219     54 £3,303     55 £3,310     55  £3,154     52 £3,219     54 £3,303     55

United Kingdom

   485     8    490     8    513     8     442     7    485     8    490     8  

The Netherlands

   189     3    204     3    243     4     165     3    189     3    204     3  

Rest of Europe

   1,095     18    1,131     19    1,132     19     1,176     19    1,095     18    1,131     19  

Rest of world

   1,014     17    927     15    873     14     1,179     19    1,014     17    927     15  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  £6,002     100 £6,055     100 £6,071     100  £6,116     100 £6,002     100 £6,055     100
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The cost profile of individual businesses within Reed Elsevier varies widely and costs are controlled on an individual business unit basis. The most significant cost item for Reed Elsevier as a whole is staff costs of £1,820 million (2011: £1,797 million (2010:million; 2010: £1,838 million; 2009: £1,852 million).

The following tables show revenue, operating profit and adjusted operating profit for each of Reed Elsevier’s business segments in each of the three years ended December 31, 20112012 together with the percentage change in 20112012 and 20102011 at both actual and constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating profit is a measure included on the basis that it is athe key financialsegmental profit measure used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources to the business segments, as reported under IFRS 8:IFRS8: Operating Segments in note 3 to the combined financial statements. Adjusted operating profit represents operating profit before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets, and goodwill, exceptional restructuring andcosts, acquisition related costs, the share of profit on disposaldisposals in joint ventures, and is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. RestructuringExceptional restructuring costs in 2010 related only to the restructuring of the Reed Business Information business and in 2009 relate to the exceptional restructuring programmes across Reed Elsevier.business. Exceptional restructuring costs principally comprise severance, outsourcing migration and associated property costs. A reconciliation of operating profit to adjusted operating profit is included below. Operating profit by business segment is provided as supplementary information.

With effect from January 1, January 2011, LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal, & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately. Comparative profit figures for 2010 have been restated on a proforma basis as if the businesses had operated separately in that year. Proforma profit information for 2009 is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.

  Revenue
Year ended December 31,
 
  2012  2011  % change  2010  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Scientific, Technical & Medical

 £2,063    34 £2,058    34  0  +1 £2,026    34  +2  +1

Risk Solutions

  926    15    908    15    +2    +1    927    15    -2    +1  

Business Information

  663    11    695    12    -5    -3    718    12    -3    -4  

Legal

  1,610    26    1,634    27    -1    -1    1,691    28    -3    -2  

Exhibitions

  854    14    707    12    +21    +25    693    11    +2    +1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 £6,116    100 £6,002    100  +2  +3 £6,055    100  -1  0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Operating Profit
Year ended December 31,
 
  2012  2011  % change  2010  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Scientific, Technical & Medical

 £706    52 £695    57  +2  +1 £647    59  +7  +4

Risk Solutions

  281    20    181    15    +55    +54    165    15    +10    +13  

Business Information

  76    5    68    5    +13    +15                  

Legal

  146    11    144    12    +1    +4    159    15    -9    -11  

Exhibitions

  171    12    132    11    +29    +34    127    11    +4    +2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

 £1,380    100 £1,220    100   £1,098    100  

Corporate costs

  (47   (49     (34   

Unallocated net pension credit(3)

  25     34       26     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 £1,358    £1,205     +13  +13 £1,090     +11  +8
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  Revenue
Year ended December 31,
 
  2011  2010  % change  2009  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Elsevier

  £2,058    34  £2,026    34  +2  +1  £1,985    33  +2  +2

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

  908    15    927    15    -2    +1    865    14    +7    +6  

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

  1,634    27    1,691    28    -3    -2    1,692    28        -2  

Reed Exhibitions

  707    12    693    11    +2    +1    638    11    +9    +9  

Reed Business Information

  695    12    718    12    -3    -4    891    14    -19    -20  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  £6,002    100  £6,055    100  -1  0  £6,071    100  0  -1
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Operating Profit
Year ended December 31,
 
  2011  2010  % change  2009  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Elsevier

  £695    57  £647    59  +7  +4  £563    69  +15  +14

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

  181    15    165    15    +10    +13      

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

  144    12    159    15    -9    -11      

LexisNexis(5)

        337    41    -4    -6  

Reed Exhibitions

  132    11    127    11    +4    +2    79    10    +61    +61  

Reed Business Information

  68    5              (163  (20  +100    +99  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

  £1,220    100  £1,098    100    £816    100  

Corporate costs

  (49   (34     (35   

Unallocated net pension credit(4)

  34     26       6     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  £1,205     £1,090     +11  +8  £787     +39  +37
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Adjusted Operating Profit(3)
Year ended December 31,
 
  2011  2010  % change  2009  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Elsevier

  £768    47  £724    46  +6  +3  £693    43  +4  +4

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

  362    22    354    23    +2    +6      

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

  229    14    238    15    -4    -4      

LexisNexis(5)

        665    42    -11    -12  

Reed Exhibitions

  167    10    158    10    +6    +4    152    10    +4    +4  

Reed Business Information

  110    7    89    6    +23    +22    89    5          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

  £1,636    100  £1,563    100    £1,599    100  

Corporate costs

  (44   (34     (35   

Unallocated net pension credit(4)

  34     26       6     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  £1,626     £1,555     +5  +4  £1,570     -1  -2
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Adjusted Operating Profit(4)
Year ended December 31,
 
  2012  2011  % change  2010  % change 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(1)
  

 

  

 

  actual
rates
  constant
rates
(2)
 
  (in millions, except percentages) 

Scientific, Technical & Medical

  £780    45  £768    47  +2  +1  £724    46  +6  +3

Risk Solutions

  392    23    362    22    +8    +7    354    23    +2    +6  

Business Information

  119    7    110    7    +8    +10    89    6    +23    +22  

Legal

  234    13    229    14    +2    +4    238    15    -4    -4  

Exhibitions

  210    12    167    10    +26    +30    158    10    +6    +4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

  £1,735    100  £1,636    100    £1,563    100  

Corporate costs

  (47   (44     (34   

Unallocated net pension credit(3)

  25     34       26     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,713     £1,626     +5  +6%    £1,555     +5  +4
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Represents percentage change in 2012 over 2011 at constant rates of exchange, which have been calculated using the average and hedge exchange rates for the 2011 financial year. These rates were used in the preparation of the 2011 combined financial statements.

(2)Represents percentage change in 2011 over 2010 at constant rates of exchange, which have been calculated using the average and hedge exchange rates for the 2010 financial year. These rates were used in the preparation of the 2010 combined financial statements.

 

(2)(3)Represents percentage change in 2010 over 2009 at constant ratesThe unallocated net pension credit of exchange, which have been calculated using£25 million (2011: £34 million; 2010: £26 million) comprises the average and hedge exchange rates for the 2009 financial year. These rates were used in the preparationexpected return on pension scheme assets of the 2009 combined financial statements.£221 million (2011: £235 million; 2010: £217 million) less interest on pension scheme liabilities of £196 million (2011: £201 million; 2010: £191 million).

 

(3)(4)Adjusted operating profit represents operating profit before the amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets, and goodwill, exceptional restructuring andcosts, acquisition related costs, the share of profit on disposal in joint ventures and is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures, and is reconciled to operating profit below.

(4)The unallocated net pension credit of £34 million (2010: £26 million; 2009: £6 million) comprises the expected return on pension scheme assets of £235 million (2010: £217 million; 2009: £189 million) less interest on pension scheme liabilities of £201 million (2010: £191 million; 2009: £183 million).

(5)Percentage change at actual and constant rates relates to the LexisNexis business for 2009 and 2010. With effect from January 1, 2011 LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional. Comparative profit figures for 2010 have been restated on a proforma basis as if the business had operated separately in that year. Proforma profit information for 2009 is not available and the cost to develop it would be excessive.

Adjusted operating profit for Reed Elsevier is a non-GAAP measure included on the basis that it is a key financial measure used by management to evaluatein assessing performance, and allocate resources, and is derived from operating profit as follows:

 

   2011  2010   2009 
   (in millions) 

Operating profit

  £1,205   £1,090    £787  

Adjustments:

     

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   359    349     368  

Impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill

            177  

Exceptional restructuring costs

       57     182  

Acquisition related costs

   52    50     48  

Share of profit on disposals in joint ventures

   (1         

Reclassification of tax in joint ventures

   11    9     8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

  £1,626   £1,555    £1,570  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2012   2011  2010 
   (in millions) 

Operating profit

  £1,358    £1,205   £1,090  

Adjustments:

     

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   329     359    349  

Exceptional restructuring costs

            57  

Acquisition related costs

   21     52    50  

Share of profit on disposals in joint ventures

        (1    

Reclassification of tax in joint ventures

   5     11    9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

  £1,713    £1,626   £1,555  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Underlying revenue growth is a non-GAAP measure included on the basis that it is a key financial measure used by management to evaluatein assessing performance. References to underlying performance are calculated to exclude the results of all acquisitions and disposals made in the current and prior year, assets held for sale and currency translation effects. A reconciliation of reported revenues and adjusted operating profit year-on-year is presented below:

 

 Revenue Adjusted
operating profit
  Revenue Adjusted
operating profit
 
 £m % change £m % change  £m % change £m % change 

Year to December 31, 2009

  6,071        1,570    

  

Year to December 31, 2010

  6,055        1,555      

Underlying growth

  100    +2  (16  
-1

  88    +2  73    +5

Acquisitions

  5    0      
0

  46    +1  8    +1

Disposals

  (173  -3  (12  -1  (156  -3  (25  -2

Currency effects

  52    +1  13    +1  (31  -1  15    +1
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Year to December 31, 2010

  6,055    0  1,555    -1

Year to December 31, 2011

  6,002    -1  1,626    +5

Underlying growth

  88    +2  73    +5  230    +4  85    +6

Acquisition

  46    +1  8    0  148    +3  35    +2

Disposals

  (156  -3  (25  -2  (201  -4  (22  -2

Currency effects

  (31  -1  15    +1  (63  -1  (11  -1
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Year to December 31, 2011

  6,002    -1  1,626    +5

Year to December 31, 2012

  6,116    +2  1,713    +5
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

In the commentary below,following, percentage movements are at actual exchange rates unless otherwise stated. Percentage movements at constant exchange rates are calculated using the average and hedge exchange rates for the previous financial year. Percentage movements at both actual rates and constant rates are shown in tables on pages 26 and 27.page 26. The effect of currency movements on the 20112012 results is further described separately below (see “— Effect of Currency Translation” on pages 33 and 34)page 33). References to operating profit relate to operating profit including joint ventures. Adjusted operating margin and underlying growth are defined in the glossary on pages S-1 and S-2.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Revenue was £6,116 million (2011: £6,002 million), up 2%. At constant exchange rates, revenue was up 3%. Underlying revenue growth was 4%, or 3% excluding the net cycling in of biennial exhibitions.

Cost of sales were £2,139 million, up 1% compared with 2011, with underlying volume growth and product development partly offset by the impact of disposals. Selling and distribution costs were £1,015 million, down 6%, including the impact of disposals. Administration and other expenses were £1,628 million, flat with the prior year, with the impact of disposals, including the lower acquired intangible asset amortisation, offset by technology investments. Changes in cost of sales, selling and distribution costs, and administration and other expenses, including changes in individual components thereof, were not material to the adjusted operating profit performance of the individual segments.

Reported operating profit was £1,358 million (2011: £1,205 million), primarily reflecting improved trading performance. Adjusted operating profit was £1,713 million (2011: £1,626 million), up 5%. At constant currencies, adjusted operating profits were up 6%. Underlying growth was also 6%. The overall adjusted operating margin at 28.0% was 0.9 percentage points higher than in the prior year. This included a 0.5 percentage point benefit to margin from portfolio change and a 0.1 percentage point benefit from the multi-year journal subscription currency hedging programme net of other currency translation effects. Underlying operating costs were up 4%, reflecting volume growth as well as organic investment in new product development and sales and marketing, partly offset by continued improvements in process efficiency.

The amortisation charge in respect of acquired intangible assets, including the share of amortisation in joint ventures, amounted to £329 million (2011: £359 million). Acquisition related costs were £21 million (2011: £52 million), reflecting the completion of the ChoicePoint integration programme in 2011. Disposals and other non operating gains were £45 million (2011: £21 million losses), principally arising from business divestments, in particularTotaljobs, offset by property charges relating to disposed businesses.

Net finance costs were lower at £216 million (2011: £235 million), including the benefit of term debt refinancing.

The reported profit before tax was £1,187 million (2011: £948 million). The reported tax charge was £113 million (2011: £181 million). This includes an exceptional tax credit of £96 million resulting from the resolution of a number of significant prior year tax matters. The reported net profit attributable to the parent companies’ shareholders was £1,069 million (2011: £760 million).

Scientific, Technical & Medical

Elsevier achieved revenue growth in primary research and databases & tools across scientific & medical segments, with particular strength in emerging markets. Research article submissions and usage grew by double digits. Electronic revenues, which now account for 68% of total revenues, grew across all segments. Print book and pharma promotion revenues continued to decline.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were both up 1% at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 2% and 4% respectively.

Underlying revenue growth in primary research solutions across the scientific and medical segments was driven by double digit growth in both submissions and article downloads, with growth in faster growing economies outside Europe and the US. The number of article submissions to journals exceeded 1 million for the first time in 2012, with over 11 million users downloading nearly 700 million articles during the year. Elsevier’s overall relative impact factor and citation share continued to grow in the year.

In addition to growth in traditional “subscriber-pays” article volumes, “author-pays”, or “author’s-funder-pays” article volumes increased during the year, albeit from a small base. A sponsored article option is currently available in 1,500 journals and 30 stand-alone journals operate under this payment model.

Growth in databases & tools revenue was driven by new sales and usage growth.

Sales of print books to individuals continued to decline in 2012 reflecting format migration and subdued reference and education markets. Print pharma promotion revenues also continued to decline reflecting industry trends.

In August 2012 the management structure of Elsevier was reorganised, combining science & technology and health sciences. Had these revenue streams still been managed separately, their pro forma underlying revenue growth would have been 5% and flat respectively.

In 2012 the adjusted operating profit margin continued to improve, driven by continued process efficiencies and currency hedging benefits.

Risk Solutions

Risk Solutions reported underlying revenue growth in 2012 as data & analytics solutions were extended across risk markets, driving growth in both Insurance and Business Services. There was also a return to growth in the Government segment. The improvement in adjusted operating profit margin largely reflects the impact of disposals, with underlying cost growth broadly matching revenue growth, reflecting ongoing spend on new product development.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and 7% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits both grew 6%.

The Insurance business grew underlying revenues by 7%, with growth reflecting the extension of products and services across the insurance carrier workflow, and expansion in new market segments.

Business Services revenue growth was 7%. In financial services, the anti-money laundering, fraud detection and credit decisioning solutions all performed well, and revenues were positively impacted by some temporary effects of increased mortgage refinancing activities. The receivables management business remained soft.

The Government business returned to growth in 2012 reflecting demand for new fraud detection products in the state & local segment, with continuing moderate declines in the federal segment.

All Risk Solutions market segments now leverage HPCC “big data” technology to combine proprietary, public, and third party information with advanced analytics to help customers in evaluating, predicting, and managing risk and improving efficiency. In 2012, 96% of revenue was delivered electronically.

In January 2013 the disposal of the Screening business was announced, which has been excluded from underlying revenue growth figures. If Screening had been included in the underlying results, the underlying revenue growth rate for Risk Solutions as a whole would still have been 6%.

Underlying operating cost growth was broadly in line with revenue growth in 2012, reflecting spend on new products and content sets. The adjusted operating profit margin increased by 2.4 percentage points, largely reflecting the impact of portfolio changes in 2011.

Business Information

Underlying revenue growth in 2012 reflects growth from most of the Major Data Services businesses, modest growth in Marketing Solutions and Leading Brands, and a moderation in the rate of decline in Other Business Magazines & Services. In 2012 several businesses were divested that no longer fit with strategy. Process efficiencies together with portfolio development benefits drove a 2.2 percentage point margin improvement.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were down 3% and up 10% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues grew 2%, and underlying adjusted operating profits grew 10%.

Double digit growth atBankersAccuity andICIS helped to drive growth in Major Data Services, mitigated by continued weakness in US construction data. Major Data Services now accounts for approximately 45% of continuing portfolio pro forma revenues and the majority of Reed Business Information operating profit.

Marketing Solutions delivered modest growth in 2012 and, following the disposal ofTotaljobs andHotfrog, accounts for only a small proportion of continuing portfolio revenues.

Leading Brands also delivered modest underlying revenue growth as solid performances in the UK agriculture and property sectors were offset by advertising declines elsewhere.

Other Business Magazines & Services saw moderating underlying revenue declines and continued portfolio reshaping.

Businesses includingTotaljobs, Marketcast,Variety, RBI Australia, RBI Spain were disposed of or reclassified as held for sale during the year.

In 2012 focus on process innovation together with the benefits of portfolio development helped to increase the adjusted operating profit margin by 2.2 percentage points.

These actions have contributed to the transformation of Reed Business Information’s profile, with user and subscription services now accounting for nearly 70% of revenues, and electronic revenue streams now accounting for over half of the total.

In December 2012 the management structure was reorganised to bring LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Reed Business Information together more closely in order to continue to build the Risk Solutions’ business globally. Risk Solutions’ strength in data, analytics and technology is to be leveraged in combination with Reed Business Information’s broader geographic footprint and industry specific databases.

Legal

Underlying revenue growth was positive despite subdued legal markets in the US and Europe. Growth was driven by electronic products and services, which account for over 75% of total revenues. In 2012 new products and services were released on the New Lexis platform.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were down 1% and up 4% respectively. Underlying revenues grew 1%, and underlying adjusted operating profits grew 4%.

In the US, usage and sales of online research and litigation solutions to law firms grew despite challenging market conditions. Underlying revenues from government and corporate customers also grew modestly. Print revenues continued to decline, and News & Business revenue declines moderated.

LexisNexis introduced new releases ofLexis Advance during 2012, combining the business’ deep domain expertise and content with Reed Elsevier’s “big data” HPCC technology to allow researchers within legal and professional organisations to find highly relevant information more easily and efficiently. The new applications had US customer penetration of 45% by the 2012 year end.

In Europe market conditions remain subdued, with growth in online revenue largely offset by declining print revenues.

The 2012 the adjusted operating profit margin improved slightly, with process efficiencies offsetting continued spend on new product development.

Exhibitions

Exhibitions saw growth in the US and Japan, moderate growth in Europe, and double digit growth in most emerging markets during the year. Investment continued throughout the year, launching 30 new shows in total, including several in high growth markets through partnerships and targeted acquisitions.

Revenue and adjusted operating profits were up 25% and 30% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 15% and 20% respectively.

In the US and Japan underlying revenues increased, and growth in emerging markets was well into double digits. In Europe growth from a number of core events helped to offset some softness in southern European markets, resulting in moderate underlying revenue growth overall in the region.

During 2012 Exhibitions launched 30 new events, primarily in high growth sectors and geographies, and completed a number of targeted acquisitions. In Brazil, Exhibitions took full ownership of Alcantara Machado, previously a joint venture, and expanded into hospitality and logistics. In Turkey a new joint venture was created with Tüyap, a Turkish event organiser.

2012 adjusted operating profit margins improved by 1.0 percentage points, reflecting both process efficiencies and the positive impact of biennial event cycling.

During the year the business rolled out global platforms and processes across geographies and sectors. The integrated web event platform is now used by more than 70% of events.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

General

Revenues at £6,002 million (2010: £6,055 million) were down 1% compared with 2010. At constant exchange rates, revenue was flat compared with the prior year. Underlying revenue growth was 2%, or 3% excluding the net cycling out of biennial exhibitions. This compares with underlying revenue growth in the prior year of 2%, or 1% excluding the biennial exhibition cycling. The underlying revenue performance reflects the continued portfolio development, new product introduction, expanded sales & marketing, and other actions taken to improve the business.

Cost of sales were £2,126 million, down 4% compared with 2010, and selling and distribution costs were £1,075 million, down 1%, the reductions primarily reflecting business disposals and currency effects, as well as cost of sales savings in Risk Solutions from the ChoicePoint integration. Administration and other expenses were £1,626 million, down 4%, reflecting the completion of the RBI exceptional restructuring programme in 2010, with related costs in that year of £57 million, largely relating to severance and property costs. Other than as disclosed herein, changes in cost of sales, selling and distribution costs, and administration and other expenses, including changes in individual components thereof, were not material to the operating profit performance of the individual segments.

Reported operating profit was £1,205 million (2010: £1,090 million). The increase reflects improved trading performance and no exceptional restructuring costs.

Adjusted operating profit was £1,626m£1,626 million (2010: £1,555m)£1,555 million), up 5%. At constant currencies, adjusted operating profits were up 4%. Underlying growth in adjusted operating profits was 5%. The overall adjusted operating margin at 27.1% was 1.4 percentage points higher than last year. This included a 0.4 percentage point benefit to margin of the multi year subscription currency hedging programme and other currency translation effects. Underlying operating costs were flat against the prior year, despite business growth and additional spending on new product development and sales & marketing, reflecting the continued focus on process efficiency and procurement savings, and the benefit of prior year restructuring.

The amortisation charge in respect of acquired intangible assets, including the share of amortisation in joint ventures, amounted to £359 million (2010: £349 million).

Exceptional restructuring costs were nil (2010: £57 million, in respect of the restructuring of RBI). Acquisition related costs amounted to £52 million (2010: £50 million) most significantly in respect of technology integration within LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Disposals and other non operating losses were £22 million (2010: £46 million), including the share of disposal profits in joint venues.

Net finance costs were lower at £235 million (2010: £276 million), reflecting the benefit of free cash flow, term debt redemptions and the expiry of interest rate swaps.

The reported profit before tax was £948 million (2010: £768 million). The reported tax charge was £181 million (2010: £120 million). The application of tax law and practice is subject to some uncertainty and amounts have been provided in respect of this. Issues are raised during the course of regular tax audits and discussions with the Internal Revenue Service including on the deductibility of interest in the US on cross-border financing are ongoing. Although the outcome of open items cannot be predicted, no material impact on results is expected from such issues.

Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders was £760 million, up from £642 million in 2010, reflecting the higher profit before tax partly offset by the higher tax charge.

Since January 1, 2011, Risk Solutions and Legal have been operating as separate businesses. In aggregate, revenue decreased by 3% to £2,542 million (2010: £2,618 million) and adjusted operating profits were flat at £591 million (2010: £592 million). The results of each business are presented separately below.

ElsevierScientific, Technical & Medical

Increasing global scientific and medical research activity supported growth in research information and online tools. Health Sciences saw continued pressure on print book sales to individuals and European pharmaceutical promotion, but achieved growth in global medical research and clinical decision support.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and 3% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 2% and 4% respectively.

Science & Technology generated underlying revenue growth of 4%. Global research activity has continued to grow broadly in line with long term historic trends, and Elsevier generated growth in the volume of articles submitted and published in the year, and improved the quality of articles relative to other publishers as measured by citation share.

Health Sciences’ underlying revenues were flat. Our global medical research business benefited from similar drivers to those in the Science & Technology research business, and online clinical decision support achieved double digit growth as healthcare customers look to achieve improved medical outcomes and increased efficiency. Across Health Sciences, online solution and electronic products grew well and now account for nearly 40% of revenues. European pharma promotions declines have continued, and print book sales to individuals came under increasing pressure, reflecting the format shift to online, and pressure on enrolment in US nursing and health profession career schools. Our business in emerging markets, most notably India, China and Latin America, performed well.

Underlying operating cost growth was 1%, reflecting ongoing emphasis on process efficiencies and procurement savings offsetting business growth and spending on new product development and sales & marketing initiatives.

LexisNexis

Since January 1, 2011, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional have been operating as separate businesses. In aggregate, revenue decreased by 3% to £2,542 million (2010: £2,618 million) and adjusted operating profits were flat at £591 million (2010: £592 million). The results of each business are presented separately below.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

LexisNexis Risk solutionsSolutions reported growth in insurance data & analytics and business services reflecting demand for core products and the extension of the range of services that are provided. Screening revenues slowed in the second half reflecting US hiring trends, and federal government markets remained under pressure.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and 6% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 4% and 12% respectively.

The insurance data & analytics business generated revenue growth of 7%, driven by the increasing adoption of solutions across the insurance workflow from marketing through to claims handling that improve underwriting economics and operational efficiency. In November LexisNexis2011, Risk Solutions completed the sale of its infrastructure software business, focusing the insurance business on high value data and analytics.

Business services achieved growth of 4%, reflecting growth in credit scoring and anti-money laundering for the financial services industry and e-commerce for corporate markets, moderated by the effect of a softening in the US real estate market on the mortgage-related business.

Screening solutions grew 3%, with growth slowing over the course of the year as operational improvements in sales force effectiveness and increased penetration of the mid-size corporate market were offset by a US hiring environment that weakened as the year progressed. Government solutions revenues declined as the wind down of some lower margin one-off federal sales were only partly offset by growth in state and local revenues, driven by increased focus on fraud, waste and abuse.

Underlying operating costs declined by 1% despite the business growth and new product investment, reflecting cost savings, notably in technology, and from the completion of the ChoicePoint integration. The adjusted operating margin increased by 1.7 percentage points to 39.9%.

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

LexisNexis Legal & Professional revenues returned to underlying revenue growth in 2011, and adjusted operating margins were broadly flat, as expected. Most legal markets have stabilized, and new products were launched.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were down 2% and 4% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and down 2% respectively.

US research & litigation revenues returned to slight growth, benefiting from a stabilisation in legal industry activity. Growth was achieved in lexis.com searches and in new sales of research and litigation tools and services to law firms, government and corporate legal customers. Growth in practice management tools was offset by continued but moderating declines in news & business information to corporate customers, and in web based listings.

International markets outside of the US also returned to growth. Electronic revenues grew 7% reflecting demand for legal tools and solutions, although this was largely offset by further print declines as format transition continued. Print base products now account for less than 40% of revenue.

Underlying cost growth was 1% reflecting continued investment in the next generation legal offerings and sales & marketing, offset by continued cost initiatives. The adjusted operating margin was broadly flat at 14.0%.

Reed Exhibitions

The net cycling out of biennial shows held back growth in 2011. Excluding biennial cycling, underlying revenue growth was 10%, with growth across all geographies. New launch activity was accelerated in 2011, and a number of selective acquisitions were made which have increased the business’ presence in high growth markets.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and 4% respectively at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were flat and up 2% respectively.

In Europe, underlying revenue grew 6% excluding biennial cycling, withMipcom andMapic performing well.Mipim, Reed Exhibitions’ largest individual show, returned to growth after experiencing a decline in 2010. In North America underlying revenues grew 16% excluding cycling. Outside Europe and North America underlying revenue growth was 13% excluding biennial events, including growth in China, Brazil, Russia and the Middle East.

Underlying costs were down 1%, reflecting cost control, while funding the significantly increased launch programme and build out of global industry groups and information technology capabilities. The adjusted operating margin was 0.8 percentage points higher than in 2010 at 23.6%.

Reed Business Information

RBIReed Business Information returned to underlying revenue growth, with growth in data services mostly offset by continued weakness in print advertising. Significant further progress on portfolio realignment was made with acquisitions in data services and disposals of print magazine titles. The majority of the margin increase reflects organic development, supported by exits from low margin businesses.

Revenues were down 4% and adjusted operating profits up at 22% at constant currencies. Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1% and 15% respectively.

The major data services businesses, which accounted for 25% of RBIReed Business Information revenues in 2011, delivered underlying revenue growth of 9%, including growth inICIS,Bankers AlmanacandXpertHR, partially offset byReed Construction Dataserving the challenged US construction industry. Online marketing solutions grew 2%, driven largely byTotaljobsin the UK online recruitment market, offset by weakness in lead generation businesses,BuyerZoneandHotfrog. Leading brands saw stable revenues, with online growth compensating for print advertising declines. Other business magazines and communities saw an underlying revenue decline of 5% reflecting continued print advertising market weakness.

Underlying operating costs were down 2%, reflecting continuing measures taken to realign the cost base. Adjusted operating margins increased 3.4 percentage points to 15.8%.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

GeneralLegal

Revenue was £6,055 million (2009: £6,071 million), flat on the prior year and down 1% at constant exchange rates. UnderlyingLegal revenues were 2% higher.

Operating profits of £1,090 million were up 39%, or up 37% at constant exchange rates, compared with £787 million in 2009. The significant increase principally reflects no intangible asset and goodwill impairment and lower exceptional restructuring charges.

The amortisation charge in respect of acquired intangible assets, including the share of amortisation in joint ventures, was £349 million (2009: £368 million), down £19 million as a result of disposals and prior year impairments. Charges for impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill were nil (2009: £177 million, principally relatingreturned to the RBI US business).

Exceptional restructuring costs, which in 2010 relate only to the restructuring of RBI, amounted to £57 million (2009: £182 million relating to major restructuring programmes across Reed Elsevier announced in February 2008 and 2009) and included severance and vacant property costs. Acquisition related costs amounted to £50 million (2009: £48 million) principally in respect of the integration within LexisNexis of the ChoicePoint business acquired in September 2008.

Excluding amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill of £349 million (2009: £545 million), exceptional restructuring costs of £57 million (2009: £182 million), acquisition related costs of £50 million (2009: £48 million), and tax charges in respect of joint ventures of £9 million (2009: £8 million), operating profits would have been down 1% at £1,555 million (2009: £1,570 million), or down 2% at constant exchange rates, and down 1% on an underlying basis.

Operating margin, including amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, and the equity share of taxes in joint ventures was 18.0% (2009: 13.0%). Excluding these items, the adjusted margin would have been 25.7%, 0.2 percentage points lower than the prior year and, excluding cost reduction from asset disposals and closures, which had a 0.5 percentage points benefit to this margin, costs increased by 3% on an underlying basis. Increased spending on new product development, infrastructure, and sales & marketing, particularly in the legal businesses, has been offset by cost actions across the business, including incremental savings from the earlier exceptional restructuring programmes.

Disposals and other non operating losses of £46 million (2009: £61 million) principally relate to asset sales and related closures in RBI’s US businesses.

Net finance costs were £276 million (2009: £291 million), with the benefit of cash flow and the July 2009 share placings being partly offset by the impact of higher coupon term debt issued in 2009 to repay certain of the ChoicePoint acquisition facility loans.

Profit before tax, including amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, disposals and other non operating items, was £768 million (2009: £435 million).

The tax charge was higher at £120 million (2009: £40 million) reflecting the increase in profit before tax and prior year tax credits on disposals. The application of tax law and practice is subject to some uncertainty and provisions are held in respect of this. Issues are raised during the course of regular tax audits and discussions with the Internal Revenue Service including on the deductibility of interest in the US on cross-border financing are ongoing. Although the outcome of open items cannot be predicted, no material impact on results is expected from such issues.

Profit attributable to shareholders was £642 million, up from £391 million in 2009, reflecting the higher profit before tax partly offset by the higher tax charge.

Elsevier

Elsevier sawrevenue growth in a constrained customer budget environment. 2011, and adjusted operating margins were broadly flat, as expected. Most legal markets have stabilized, and new products were launched.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits increased bywere down 2% and 4% respectively at constant currencies, with the improvement in adjusted operating margin reflecting increased cost efficiency.

Science & Technology saw 3% revenue growth at constant currencies.ScienceDirectand other journal subscription revenues developed as expected in a difficult academic budget environment. Content quantity, quality and usage continued to grow,reflecting the growth in research activity worldwide. TheScopusabstract and indexing database performed well with a significant increase in subscriptions. New content sets and product features were added andScopussaw a 30% increase in customer searches. Other specialist databases also grew well as the development of new features and content continued. In reference and education, in a smaller frontlist publishing year, electronic sales grew and print revenue decline stabilised.

In Health Sciences, revenues were flat at constant currencies, or up 1% underlying before taking account of small acquisitions and disposals. Modest growth was seen in medical research journal subscriptions revenues, reflecting the same academic budget pressures seen in Science & Technology. Subscriptions to integrated online solutions and other electronic product sales grew well in nursing and health professional education, clinical reference and in the majority of clinical decision support. Growth was tempered by constrained budgets, pending US healthcare reform and moderating enrolment, as career schools adjust to expected legislation affecting student funding. Pharma promotion and other advertising revenues were lower, with continuing weakness in Europe. Emerging markets grew well due to the continued expansion of local publishing to meet the increasing demand for medical education and clinical reference products.

Underlying cost growth, excluding amortisation of intangible assets, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs was 1%, with increased spend on new product development, sales and marketing offset by additional cost savings in offshore production, procurement and the streamlining of operations and support services.

LexisNexis

In 2010 and 2009 LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional operated in one LexisNexis business.

LexisNexis returned to revenue growth, driven by growth in the risk business. Subscription revenues in the legal business continued to reflect the lower levels of law firm activity and employment. Adjusted operating margin was lower due to the weaker revenues and increased spending in the legal business on new product development, related infrastructure and sales & marketing.

LexisNexis revenues increased by 1% and adjusted operating profits declined 12% at constant currencies, both beforewere up 1% and after small acquisitionsdown 2% respectively.

US research & litigation revenues returned to slight growth, benefiting from a stabilisation in legal industry activity. Growth was achieved in lexis.com searches and disposals.in new sales of research and litigation tools and services to law firms, government and corporate legal customers. Growth in practice management tools was offset by continued but moderating declines in news & business information to corporate customers, and in web based listings.

International markets outside of the US also returned to growth. Electronic revenues grew 7% reflecting demand for legal tools and solutions, although this was largely offset by further print declines as format transition continued. Print base products now account for less than 40% of revenue.

Underlying operating cost growth was 1% reflecting continued investment in the next generation legal offerings and sales & marketing, offset by continued cost initiatives. The adjusted operating margin declined 3.4% due to the revenue declinewas broadly flat at 14.0%.

Exhibitions

The net cycling out of biennial shows held back growth in the legal businesses combined with increases in spend on new legal product development, related infrastructure, sales & marketing, and restructuring costs. This was in part mitigated by continuing cost actions, including further outsourcing of production and engineering activities, supply chain management and operational streamlining in the legal businesses and the further integration within risk solutions. Underlying cost growth, excluding amortisation of intangible assets, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs was 6%.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions grew revenues 6% at constant currencies, with the insurance segment continuing to grow and the more cyclical markets, most notably employment screening, returning to growth. The insurance solutions business saw2011. Excluding biennial cycling, underlying revenue growth of 8% driven by high transactional activity in the auto and property insurance markets and increasing sales of data and analytics products. The transactional activitywas 10%, with growth reflects increasing levels of insurance quoting as consumers seek better policy terms stimulated by sustained promotion by insurance companies and the growth of internet quoting and policy binding. The more cyclical businesses returned to growth as the US economy recovered. The employment screening business grew 12%, compared to a decline of 22% in the prior year, as major retailers and other employers increased hiring activity. Business services saw growth in the financial services segment with increasing demand for anti-money laundering and fraud prevention products. Demand growth in government markets for identity verification and authentication information and analytics was however held back by longer sales cycles reflecting the uncertainty over government budgets.

The LexisNexis Legal & Professional business saw a revenue decline of 2% at constant currencies reflecting the impact on renewals and print product of the low levels of law firm activity and employment. Corporate, government and academic markets were lower. US revenues declined 2% at constant currencies, or 1% underlying before the net effect of small disposals and acquisitions. This compares to a decline of 6% in the prior year. The decline was largely driven by the continued contraction in corporate, government and academic markets which saw revenues 5% lower in a challenging budgetary environment for customers, impacting in particular sales of the news & business information databases to corporate customers, which were down 13%. US law firm revenues were up 2% or down 2% before last year’s change in revenue allocation in Martindale-Hubbell. Law firm subscription, print and transactional revenues remained under pressure as contract renewals reflected the lower levels of law firm activity and lawyer employment than was the case when they were last agreed, typically two to three years ago. Aside from this late cycle impact on renewals, 2010 saw legal markets in the US stabilise and growth was seen in new sales. Growth continued in litigation solutions, practice management and other services for law firms. In December 2010, LexisNexis acquired StateNet, a publisher of information on the progress of prospective legislation through the US legislative process. Outside the US, International revenues declined 2% at constant currencies. Online legal solutions saw revenues up 6% as a result of demand for technology enabled content and new workflow tools. Market penetration of these services continues to increase across all geographies. Print sales declined, particularlyNew launch activity was accelerated in the UK as law firms cut back on spending and place increasing reliance on online services. Electronic revenues now account for more than 50% of the International business.

Reed Exhibitions

Reed Exhibitions saw revenue growth with the net cycling in of biennial exhibitions2011, and a significantly moderated declinenumber of selective acquisitions were made which have increased the business’ presence in annual show revenues.high growth markets.

Revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 9%1% and 4% respectively at constant currencies, or 8% and 4% before acquisitions.

currencies. Underlying revenues excluding the effect of biennial show cycling, declined by 3% compared with a 6% decline in the first half, with stable performance or modest growth in all major markets in the second half as conditions progressively improved. The 2010 shows have seen growing attendances at the majority of annual events and exhibitor numbers up 4% in the top 50 annual shows. In the largest market, Europe, underlying revenues excluding cycling were lower by 4% compared with a 16% decline in the prior year. The US also saw moderated declines with revenues down by 5% compared to 15% in 2009. By contrast, the shows in China, Russia, the Middle East and Brazil grew although some of these are joint ventures and are therefore not included in the revenues. Reed Exhibitions now operates nearly 100 shows in emerging markets with approximately 40 shows in each of Brazil and China.

The decline in adjusted operating margin primarily reflects the revenue decline in annual shows and increased spend, including on the development of websites, analytics and other innovative online tools to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of events for both exhibitors and attendees, partly mitigated through cost savings.

Reed Business Information

Reed Business Information saw growth in data services and online marketing solutions and moderated declines in advertising markets. The portfolio was reshaped through disposals and closures and costs were reduced.

Revenues were down 20% and adjusted operating profits were flat at constant currencies. Excluding portfolio changes,and up 2% respectively.

In Europe, underlying revenue grew 6% excluding biennial cycling, withMipcomandMapicperforming well.Mipim, Reed Exhibitions’ largest individual show, returned to growth after experiencing a decline in 2010. In North America underlying revenues grew 16% excluding cycling. Outside Europe and North America underlying revenue growth was 13% excluding biennial events, including growth in China, Brazil, Russia and the Middle East.

Underlying operating costs were down 2%1%, reflecting cost control, while funding the significantly increased launch programme and adjusted operating profits increased by 4%.

In 2010, Reed Business Information (RBI) was significantly restructured and refocused. The sale and closurebuild out of the US controlled circulation magazines and certain other titles were completed, together with the sale of RBI Germany and clusters of magazine titles in the Netherlands, UK, Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Asia. The business was redefined by assetglobal industry groups and clear and distinct value creation plans were developed for each group.

information technology capabilities. The major data services businesses, which account for approximately 20% of RBI revenues, were up 4% with growth inICIS, Bankers AlmanacandXpertHR,tempered by weakness inRCDserving the US construction markets. The major online marketing solutions businesses, accounting for approximately 12% of RBI revenues, were up 10%, with a recovery inTotaljobsonline recruitment services and continuing growth in theHotfrogweb search business. Business magazines and related services, accounting for approximately 68% of RBI revenues, saw underlying revenues 6% lower driven by print advertising declines which more than offset online growth.

The 2.4% increase in adjusted operating margin reflects the significant restructuring of the business, with the disposal or closure of unprofitable assets and excluding amortisation of intangible assets, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs a 3% reductionwas 0.8 percentage points higher than in costs of the continuing business, with consolidation of operations, procurement savings and tight cost control.2010 at 23.6%.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting policies of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses under IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and as adopted by the European Union are described in note 2 to the combined financial statements. The most critical accounting policies and estimates used in determining the financial condition and results of the combined businesses, and those requiring the most subjective or complex judgments, relate to the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, pensions, share based remuneration, litigation, taxation and property provisioning.

The Audit Committees of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc have reviewed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates, and the disclosure of critical accounting policies in this annual report.

Effect of Currency Translation

The combined financial statements are expressed in sterling and are therefore subject to the impact of movements in exchange rates on the translation of the financial information of individual businesses whose operational currencies are other than sterling. The principal exposures in relation to the results reported in sterling are to the US dollar and the euro, reflecting Reed Elsevier’s business exposure to the United States and the Euro Zone,euro zone, its most important markets outside the United Kingdom.

The currency profile of Reed Elsevier’s revenue, operating profit and adjusted operating profit for 2011 is set forth below.

Revenue, operating profit and adjusted operating profit in each currency as a percentage of total revenue,

operating profit and adjusted operating profit respectively

   US Dollars  Sterling  Euro  Other  Total 

Revenue

   51  16  23  10  100

Operating profit

   31  22  38  9  100

Adjusted operating profit

   41  18  32  9  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Individual businesses within Reed Elsevier Group plc and ERF are subject to foreign exchange transaction exposures caused by the effect of exchange rate movements on their revenue and operating costs, to the extent that such revenue and costs are not denominated in their functional currencies. Individual businesses are required to hedge their exposures at market rates with the centralised treasury department within ERF. Hedging of foreign exchange transaction exposure is the only hedging activity undertaken by the individual businesses. For further details see note 19 to the combined financial statements.

Currency differences decreased Reed Elsevier’s revenue by £31£63 million in 20112012 compared to 2010.2011. Excluding amortisation of acquired intangible assets, currency differences increaseddecreased operating profits by £15£11 million in 20112012 compared to 2010.2011. Acquired intangible assets and goodwill are predominantly denominated in US dollars and, after charging amortisation, currency differences increaseddecreased operating profits by £25£8 million in 20112012 compared to 2010.2011. Borrowings are predominantly denominated in US dollars and, after charging net finance costs, currency differences increaseddecreased profit before tax by £29£8 million in 20112012 compared to 2010.2011.

To help protect Reed Elsevier PLC’s and Reed Elsevier NV’s shareholders’ equity from the effect of currency movements, Reed Elsevier will, as deemed appropriate, hedge foreign exchange translation exposures by borrowing in those currencies where significant translation exposure exists or sell forward surplus cash flow in anticipation of dividend or capital repatriation. Hedging of foreign exchange translation exposure is undertaken only by the regional centralised treasury departments and under policies agreed by the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Borrowing in the functional currency of individual businesses provides a structural hedge for the assets in those markets and for the income realised from those assets.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements are set out in note 2 to the combined financial statements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES — REED ELSEVIER

Cash Flow

Reed Elsevier’s cash generated from operations in 20112012 amounted to £1,847 million (2011: £1,735 million (2010:million; 2010: £1,649 million; 2009: £1,604 million). Included in these net cash inflows are cash outflows of £62 million (2011: £90 million (2010:million; 2010: £150 million; 2009: £169 million) relating to exceptional restructuring costs incurred in prior years and acquisition related costs. Reed Elsevier generates significant cash inflows as its principal businesses do not generally require major fixed or working capital investments. A substantial proportion of revenue is received through subscription and similar advanced receipts, principally for scientific and medical journals and exhibition fees. At December 31, 20112012 subscriptions and other revenues received in advance totalledtotaled £1,394 million (2011: £1,412 million (2010:million; 2010: £1,308 million; 2009: £1,220 million).

Reed Elsevier’s cash outflow on the purchase of property, plant and equipment in 20112012 was £70 million (2011: £85 million (2010:million; 2010: £83 million; 2009: £78 million), while proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment amounted to £7 million (2010:(2011: £7 million; 2009: £42010: £7 million). The cash outflow on internally developed intangible assets in 20112012 was £263 million (2011: £265 million (2010:million; 2010: £228 million; 2009: £164 million), reflecting increasedsustained investment in new products and related infrastructure, particularly in the LexisNexis Legal & Professional business.

Gross cash proceeds from disposals amounted to £242 million, including £7 million from the sale of non-controlling interests. Net proceeds, before tax, amounted to £160 million, after related separation and transaction costs, additional pension scheme contributions, and working capital and other adjustments in respect of prior year transactions.

During 2011,2012, Reed Elsevier paid a total of £316 million (2011: £529 million (2010:million; 2010: £50 million; 2009: £94 million) for acquisitions, including the buy out of non controlling interests and deferred consideration payable on past acquisitions, after taking account of net cash acquired of £12 million (2011: £24 million; 2010: nil). A further £7 million (2010: nil; 2009: £3was paid on the purchase of investments (2011: £10 million; 2010: £5 million). Net proceeds from during the sale of equity investments and businesses were £80 million (2010: £6 million proceeds; 2009: £2 million costs).year. During 2011,2012, Reed Elsevier paid tax of £216 million (2011: £218 million (2010:million; 2010: £9 million; 2009: £120 million).

During 2011, Reed Elsevier paid ordinary dividends totalling £497 million to the shareholders ofShare repurchases by the parent companies (2010: £483 million; 2009: £457 million). No share repurchasesin 2012 were made by£250 million (2011: nil; 2010: nil), with a further £100 million repurchased in 2013 as at February 27. On February 28, 2013, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV announced their intention to repurchase further ordinary shares up to the value of £300 million in 2011 (2010: nil; 2009: nil) and no payments (2010: nil; 2009: nil)aggregate over the remainder of 2013. No shares of the parent companies were madepurchased by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust to purchase(2011: nil; 2010: nil). Net proceeds from the exercise of share options were £48 million (2011: £9 million; 2010: £11 million).

During 2012, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV sharespaid ordinary dividends totalling £521 million to meet commitments under the Reed Elsevier share option and conditional share schemes.shareholders of the parent companies (2011: £497 million; 2010: £483 million). Dividend payments and share repurchases are funded by the operating cash flow of the business after capital spend. Proceeds, net of expenses, from share placings by the parent companies in July 2009 were £829 million.

Net borrowings, a key indebtedness measure used in assessing Reed Elsevier’s financial position, at December 31, 20112012 were £3,127 million (2011: £3,433 million (2010:million; 2010: £3,455 million; 2009: £3,931 million), comprising gross borrowings of £4,282£3,892 million, less £123£124 million of related derivative financial instrument assets and cash and cash equivalents of £726£641 million. Excluding currency effects, net borrowings increaseddecreased by £2£199 million with acquisitions and share repurchases funded from free cash flow and disposals.proceeds from divestments.

Net borrowings are reconciled as follows:

   2012  2011  2010 
   £m  £m  £m 

Cash & cash equivalents

   641    726    742  

Borrowings

   (3,892  (4,282  (4,302

Related derivative financial instruments

   124    123    105  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net borrowings

   (3,127  (3,433  (3,455
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During 2012, the second of two one year extension options was exercised on the $2.0 billion committed bank facility, extending the maturity to June 2015. This back up facility provides security of funding for short term debt.

In September 2012, €550 million of fixed rate term debt with a maturity of eight years was issued at a coupon of 2.5% (before taking into account fixed to floating interest swaps) and the proceeds used to pre-finance the €600 million 6.5% coupon term debt maturing in April 2013. In October and November 2012, $561 million of fixed rate term debt with a maturity of ten years was issued at a coupon of 3.125%. Related to this transaction, $299 million of fixed rate term debt maturing in January 2014 and January 2019, with a weighted average coupon of 8.4%, was exchanged for $311 million of the newly issued term debt and cash payments of $75 million. The remaining cash proceeds were used to reduce short term commercial paper borrowings ahead of the January 2014 bond maturity.

The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, having made appropriate enquiries, consider that adequate resources exist for the combined businesses to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations

The contractual obligations of Reed Elsevier relating to debt finance and operating leases at December 31, 20112012 analysed by when payments are due, are summarised below.

 

  Total   Less than
1  year
   1-3 years   3-5 years   After
5 years
   Total   Less than
1 year
   1-3 years   3-5 years   After
5 years
 
  (in millions)   (in millions) 

Short term debt(1)(2)

  £990    £990    £    —    £    —    £    —    £762    £762    £ —    £ —    £ —  

Long term debt (including finance leases)(2)

   4,427     209     1,681     838     1,699     4,187     173     1,112     959     1,943  

Operating leases

   640     130     188     117     205     610     117     184     125     184  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  £6,057    £1,329    £1,869    £955    £1,904    £5,559    £1,052    £1,296    £1,084    £2,127  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Short term debt primarily comprises term debt issues maturing within one year and commercial paper, and is supported by a $2,000 million committed facilitiesbank facility maturing in June 2015 and by the central management of cash and cash equivalents, and primarily comprises commercial paper.equivalents. At December 31, 2011 Reed Elsevier had access to a $2,000 million2012 the committed bank facility maturing in June 2014, which was undrawn.

 

(2)Short and long term debt obligations comprise undiscounted principal and interest cash flows. Interest cash flows are calculated by reference to the contractual payment dates and the fixed interest rates (for fixed rate debt) or the relevant forecast interest rates (for floating rate debt).

Information on retirement benefit obligations is set out in note 7 to the combined financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 20112012 Reed Elsevier had outstanding guarantees in respect of property leases. The maximum amount guaranteed as at December 31, 20112012 is £15£11 million for certain property leases up to 2024. These guarantees, which would crystallise in the event that existing lessees default on payment of their lease commitments, are unrelated to the ongoing business.

Save as disclosed above and under contractual obligations, Reed Elsevier has no off-balance sheet arrangements that currently have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the combined businesses’ financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditure or capital resources.

Treasury Policies

The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have requested that Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV have due regard to the best interests of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders in the formulation of treasury policies. Financial instruments are used to finance the Reed Elsevier businesses and to hedge transactions. Reed Elsevier’s businesses do not enter into speculative transactions. The main treasury risks faced by Reed Elsevier are liquidity risk, interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and credit risk. The Boards of the parent companies agree overall policy guidelines for managing each of these risks and the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Finance SA agree policies (in line with parent company guidelines) for their respective business and treasury centres. TheseA summary of these policies are summarisedis given below.

Interest Rate Exposure Management

Reed Elsevier’s interest rate exposure management policy is aimed at reducing the exposure of the combined businesses to changes in interest rates. The proportion of interest expense that is fixed on net debtborrowings is determined by reference to the level of net interest cover. Reed Elsevier uses fixed rate term debt, interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements and interest rate options to manage the exposure. Interest rate derivatives are used only to hedge an underlying risk and no net market positions are held.

After taking into account interest rate and currency derivatives, at December 31, 20112012 interest expense was fixed on an average of £2.4£2.2 billion of forecast debt for the next 12 months. This fixed rate debt reduces to £2.0£1.7 billion by the end of 20132014 and reduces further thereafter with all but £0.4£0.7 billion of fixed rate term debt (not swapped to floating rate) having matured by the end of 2019.

At December 31, 2011,2012, fixed rate term debt (not swapped to floating rate) amounted to £2.4£2.1 billion (2010: £2.5(2011: £2.4 billion) and had a weighted average life remaining of 5.76.2 years (2010: 6.4(2011: 5.7 years) and a weighted average interest rate of 6.4% (2011: 6.5% (2010: 6.4%). Interest rate derivatives in place at December 31, 2011,2012, which fix the interest cost on an additional £0.6£0.2 billion (2010:(2011: £0.6 billion) of variable rate debt, have a weighted average maturity of 0.80.3 years (2010: 1.1(2011: 0.8 years) and a weighted average interest rate of 3.6% (2011: 3.2% (2010: 4.2%).

Foreign Currency Exposure Management

Translation exposures arise on the earnings and net assets of business operations in countries other than those of each parent company. These exposures are hedged, to a significant extent, by a policy of denominating borrowings in currencies where significant translation exposures exist, most notably US dollars.

Currency exposures on transactions denominated in a foreign currency are required to be hedged using forward contracts. In addition, recurring transactions and future investment exposures may be hedged, in advance of becoming contractual. The precise policy differs according to the specific circumstances of the individual businesses. Highly predictable future cash flows may be covered for transactions expected to occur during the next 24 months (50 months for Elsevier science and medicalthe Scientific, Technical & Medical subscription businesses) within limits defined according to the period before the transaction is expected to become contractual. Cover takes the form of foreign exchange forward contracts.

As at December 31, 2011,2012, the amount of outstanding foreign exchange cover against future transactions was £1.3£1.2 billion (2010: £1.1(2011: £1.3 billion).

Credit Risk

Reed Elsevier has a credit exposure for the full principal amount of cash and cash equivalents held with individual counterparties. In addition, it has a credit risk from the potential non performance by counterparties to financial instruments; this credit risk normally being restricted to the amounts of any hedge gain and not the full principal amount being hedged. Credit risks are controlled by monitoring the credit quality of counterparties, principally licensed commercial banks and investment banks with strong long term credit ratings, and the amounts outstanding with each of them.

Reed Elsevier has treasury policies in place which do not allow concentrations of risk with individual counterparties and do not allow significant treasury exposures with counterparties which are rated lower than A/A2A-/A3 by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s orand Fitch. At December 31, 2011,2012, cash and cash equivalents totalled £726£641 million, of which 98% was held with banks rated A/A2 or better. Further information on credit risk is set out on page F-42.pages F-42 and F-43.

Capital and Liquidity Management

The capital structure is managed to support Reed Elsevier’s objective of maximising long term shareholder value through appropriate security of funding, ready access to debt and capital markets, cost effective borrowing and flexibility to fund business and acquisition opportunities whilst maintaining appropriate leverage to optimise the cost of capital.

Over the long term Reed Elsevier targets cash flow conversion (the proportion of adjusted operating profits converted into cash) and credit metrics to reflect this aim and that are consistent with a solid investment grade credit rating. Levels of net debtborrowings should not exceed those consistent with such a rating other than for relatively short periods of time, for instance following an acquisition.

The principal metrics utilised are free cash flow (after interest, tax and dividends) to net debt,borrowings, net debtborrowings to adjusted ebitda (adjusted earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation)EBITDA (as reconciled in the table below) and adjusted ebitdaEBITDA to net interest. Theseinterest, all on a pensions and lease adjusted basis, and these metrics are monitored and reported to senior management and board representatives on a quarterly basis. Adjusted ebitdaEBITDA is derived from net profit as follows:

 

   20112012 
   (in millions) 

Net profit for the year

  £7671,074  

Adjustments:

  

Taxation

   181113  

Disposals and other non operating items

   21(45) 

Net finance costs

   235216  

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   359329  

Depreciation and other amortisation

   207

Exceptional restructuring costs

227  

Acquisition related costs

   5221  

Reclassification of tax in joint ventures

   115  
  

 

 

 

Adjusted ebitdaEBITDA

  £1,8331,940  
  

 

 

 

Cash flow conversion of 90% or higher is consistent with the rating target. The cash flow conversion in 20112012 was 94% (2011: 93%) and as atfor the year ended December 31, 20112012 net debtborrowings to adjusted ebitdaEBITDA was 2.3x (2010: 2.5x)2.2x (2011: 2.3x) on a pensions and lease adjusted basis.

Reed Elsevier’s use of cash over the longer term reflects these objectives through a progressive dividend policy, selective acquisitions and, from time to time when conditions suggest, share repurchases whilst retaining the balance sheet strength to maintain access to the most cost effective sources of borrowing and to support Reed Elsevier’s strategic ambition in evolving publishing and information markets.

The balance of long term debt, short term debt and committed bank facilities is managed to provide security of funding, taking into account the cash generation of the business and the uncertain size and timing of acquisition spend. Reed Elsevier maintains a range of borrowing facilities and debt programmes from a variety of sources to fund its requirements at short notice and at competitive rates. The significance of Reed Elsevier Group plc’s US operations means that the majority of debt is denominated in US dollars. Policy requires that no more than US$1.5 billion of term debt issues should mature in any 12 month period and no more than US$3.0 billion in any 36 month period. In addition, minimum levels of borrowings with maturities over three and five years are specified, depending on the level of net debtborrowings and free cash flow. From time to time, Reed Elsevier may redeem term debt early or repurchase outstanding debt in the open market depending on market conditions.

There were no changes to Reed Elsevier’s long term approach to capital and liquidity management during the year.

Short Term Borrowings

The main treasury centres within Reed Elsevier operate commercial paper programmes to provide flexibility for funding operational requirements of the combined businesses on a daily basis, at short notice and at competitive rates. Commercial paper is issued under both US and Euro programmes and guaranteed by Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. In addition, short term borrowing facilities are established with local banks to support the daily requirements of businesses operating in certain countries where there may be restrictions on borrowing from affiliates or from lenders in a foreign jurisdiction. Other loans comprise term loans with an original maturity of greater than one year and which mature within

12 months of the reporting date. These short term borrowings were backed up at December 31, 20112012 by a $2,000 million committed bank facility maturing in June 20142015 which was undrawn. The short term borrowing programmes are run in conjunction with term debt programmes which comprise the majority of Reed Elsevier’s debt and provide the combined businesses with security of funding.

The average amount and the average interest rate during the year have been calculated by taking the average of the amounts outstanding at each month end (translated to sterling at the respective month end rate) and the average of the interest rate applicable at each month end. Commercial paper issuance reached a maximum month end level of £659£756 million in July 2011March 2012 as a result of trading flows and other loans reached a maximum month end level of £493£643 million in June 20112012 as the maturitymaturities of the $450 million term debt issueissues of €600 million and CHF 150 million, expiring in April 2013 and June 20122013 respectively, both then fell below 12 months.

 

Short term borrowings as at December 31, 2011
£m
 2011
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2010
£m
 2010
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2012
£m
 2012
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2011
£m
 2011
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2010
£m
 2010
Weighted
average interest
rate %

Commercial paper

  576   0.7  346   0.6  118   0.2  576   0.7  346   0.6

Short term loans and overdrafts

  20   10.1  33   8.6  13   1.5  20   10.1  33   8.6

Finance leases

  2   2.7  7   5.1  7   2.5  2   2.7  7   5.1

Other loans

  384   4.1  130   6.7  592   3.7  384   4.1  130   6.7
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total short term borrowings

  982     516     730     982     516   
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

Average short term borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2011
£m
 2011
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2010
£m
 2010
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2012
£m
 2012
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2011
£m
 2011
Weighted
average interest
rate %
 2010
£m
 2010
Weighted
average interest
rate %

Commercial paper

  504   0.6  437   0.5  547   0.5  504   0.6  437   0.5

Short term loans and overdrafts

  30   9.5  33   7.9  22   8.9  30   9.5  33   7.9

Finance leases

  9   4.9  7   5.3  5   2.7  9   4.9  7   5.3

Other loans

  297   5.0  197   4.6  469   3.7  297   5.0  197   4.6

 

Maximum month end short term borrowings  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Commercial paper

   659     688     756     659     688  

Short term loans and overdrafts

   37     37     27     37     37  

Finance leases

   10     10     7     10     10  

Other loans

   493     358     643     493     358  

OPERATING RESULTS — REED ELSEVIER PLC AND REED ELSEVIER NV

The following discussion is based on the financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV for the three years ended December 31, 2011.2012. The results of Reed Elsevier PLC reflect its shareholders’ 52.9% economic interest in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. The results of Reed Elsevier NV reflect its shareholders’ 50% economic interest in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. The respective economic interests of the Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders take account of Reed Elsevier PLC’s 5.8% indirect interest in Reed Elsevier NV. Both parent companies equity account for their respective share in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011

The earnings per share of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV were 46.0p and €0.90 respectively in 2012, compared to 32.4p and €0.59 in 2011. The increase reflects the improved trading performance, disposals and other non operating items and the exceptional prior year tax credit.

Dividends to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level, including the benefit of the UK attributable tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The exchange rate used for each dividend calculation — as defined in the Reed Elsevier merger agreement — is the spot euro:sterling exchange rate, averaged over a period of five business days commencing with the tenth business day before the announcement of the proposed dividend.

Ordinary dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise: a 2011 final dividend of 15.9p and 2012 interim dividend of 6.0p giving a total of 21.9p (2011: 20.65p) for Reed Elsevier PLC; and a 2011 final dividend of €0.326 and 2012 interim dividend of €0.130 giving a total of €0.456 (2011: €0.413) for Reed Elsevier NV.

The Board of Reed Elsevier PLC has proposed a 2012 final dividend of 17.0p, up 7%, giving a total dividend of 23.0p in respect of the financial year, up 7% on 2011. The Boards of Reed Elsevier NV, in accordance with the dividend equalisation arrangements, have proposed a 2012 final dividend of €0.337, up 3%, which results in a total dividend of €0.467 in respect of the financial year, up 7% on 2011. The difference in growth rates in the equalised final dividends reflects changes in the euro:sterling exchange rate since the respective prior year dividend announcement dates.

During 2012 Reed Elsevier repurchased 23,288,616 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 12,660,296 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares for consideration of £250 million. These shares are held in treasury. On December 28, 2012 Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV announced an irrevocable, non discretionary programme to repurchase further ordinary shares up to the value of £100 million which was completed by February 27, 2013. On February 28, 2013, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV announced their intention to repurchase further ordinary shares up to the value of £300 million in aggregate over the remainder of 2013.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

The earnings per share of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV were 32.4p and €0.59 respectively in 2011, compared to 27.3p and €0.51 in 2010. The increase reflects the improved trading performance, no exceptional restructuring costs and lower net interest expense.

Dividends to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level, including the benefit of the UK attributable tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The exchange rate used for each dividend calculation — as defined in the Reed Elsevier merger agreement — is the spot euro/euro:sterling exchange rate, averaged over a period of five business days commencing with the tenth business day before the announcement of the proposed dividend.

Ordinary dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise: a 2010 final dividend of 15.0p and 2011 interim dividend of 5.65p giving a total of 20.65p (2010: 20.4p) for Reed Elsevier PLC; and a 2010 final dividend of €0.303 and 2011 interim dividend of €0.110 giving a total of €0.413 (2010: €0.402) for Reed Elsevier NV.

The Board of Reed Elsevier PLC has proposed a 2011 final dividend of 15.90p, up 6%, giving a total dividend of 21.55p in respect of the financial year, up 6% on the prior year.2010. The Boards of Reed Elsevier NV, in accordance with the dividend equalisation arrangements, have proposed a 2011 final dividend of €0.326, up 8%, which results in a total dividend of €0.436 in respect of the financial year, up 6% on 2010. The difference in growth rates in the equalised final dividends reflects changes in the euro:sterling exchange rate since the respective prior year dividend announcement dates.

No shares were repurchased in the year by either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

The earnings per share of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV were 27.3p and €0.51 respectively in 2010, compared to 17.2p and €0.32 in 2009. The increase principally reflects lower exceptional restructuring charges and none of the intangible asset and goodwill impairment charges seen in 2009, offset in part by the dilutive effect of the July 2009 equity placings.

Dividends to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level, including the benefit of the UK attributable tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The exchange rate used for each dividend calculation — as defined in the Reed Elsevier merger agreement — is the spot euro/sterling exchange rate, averaged over a period of five business days commencing with the tenth business day before the announcement of the proposed dividend.

Ordinary dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise: a 2009 final dividend of 15.0p and 2010 interim dividend of 5.4p giving a total of 20.4p (2009: 20.4p) for Reed Elsevier PLC; and a 2009 final dividend of €0.293 and 2010 interim dividend of €0.109 giving a total of €0.402 (2009: €0.397) for Reed Elsevier NV.

The Board of Reed Elsevier PLC proposed a 2010 final dividend of 15.0p, giving a total dividend of 20.4p in respect of the financial year, unchanged on the prior year. The Boards of Reed Elsevier NV, in accordance with the dividend equalisation arrangements, proposed a 2010 final dividend of €0.303, which results in a total dividend of €0.412 in respect of the financial year, up 3% on 2009. The difference in growth rates in the equalised dividends reflects changes in the euro:sterling exchange rate since prior year dividend announcement dates.

No shares were repurchased in the year by either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV.

TREND INFORMATION

Trends, uncertainties and events which can affect the revenue, operating profit and liquidity and capital resources of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses include the usage, penetration and customer renewal of our print and electronic products and the prices that customers pay for our products, the migration of print and CD products to online services, investment in new products and services, cost control and the impact of our cost reduction programmes on operational efficiency, the levels of academic library funding, the impact of economic conditions on corporate and other customer budgets and the level of advertising demand, the actions of competitors and regulatory and legislative developments.

Trends, uncertainties and events which could have a material impact on Reed Elsevier’s revenue, operating profit and liquidity and capital resources are discussed in further detail in “Item 3: Key Information — Risk Factors”; “Item 4: Information on Reed Elsevier”; and “Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Operating Results Reed Elsevier —Elsevier; Liquidity and Capital Resources — Reed Elsevier; Operating Results — Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV”.

ITEM 6: DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

DIRECTORS

The directors of each of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV at February 15, 201227, 2013 were:

 

Name (Age)

 

Reed Elsevier PLC

 

Reed Elsevier NV

 

Reed Elsevier


Group plc

 

Elsevier Reed


Finance BV

Rudolf van den Brink(65)

Chairman of the Supervisory Board

Mark Armour(57)Elliott(63)

Non-executive Director(3)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(3)(4)Non-executive Director(2)

Erik Engstrom(49)

Executive Director and Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Executive Board and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Director and Chief Executive Officer

Anthony Habgood(66)

Non-executive Chairman(3)(4)Chairman of the Supervisory Board(3)(4)Non-executive Chairman(2)

Adrian Hennah(55)

Non-executive Director(1)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(4)Non-executive Director(1)

Lisa Hook(54)

Non-executive Director(3)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(3)(4)Non-executive Director(2)

Gerben de Jong(68)

Member of the Management Board

Marike van Lier Lels(53)

Member of the Supervisory Board(4)Member of the Supervisory Board

Duncan Palmer(47)

 Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer Member of the Executive Board and Chief Financial Officer Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer Member of the Supervisory Board

Jacques Billy(41)

Member of the Management Board

Rudolf van den Brink(64)

Chairman of the Supervisory Board

Mark Elliott(62)Robert Polet(57)

 Non-executive
Director(3)(4)
 Member of the Supervisory Board(3)(4)

Non-executive

Director(2)

��

Erik Engstrom(48)

Executive Director and Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Executive Board and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Director and Chief Executive Officer

Anthony Habgood(65)

Non-executive Chairman(3)(4)Chairman of the Supervisory Board(3)(4) Non-executive ChairmanDirector(2) 

Adrian Hennah(54)

Non-executive Director(1)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(4)

Non-executive

Director(1)

Lisa Hook(53)

Non-executive Director(1)(3)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(3)(4)

Non-executive

Director(1)

Gerben de Jong(67)

Member of the Management Board

Marike van Lier Lels(52)

Member of the Supervisory

Board(4)

Member of the Supervisory Board

Robert Polet(56)

Non-executive

Director(4)

Member of the Supervisory Board(4)

Non-executive

Director(2)

Sir David Reid(65)Reid(66)

 Non-executive Director(1)(3)(4)(5) Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(3)(4)(5) Non-executive Director(1)(2)(5) 

Alberto Romaneschi(54)

Member of the Management Board

Linda Sanford(60)

Non-executive Director(1)(4)Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(4)Non-executive Director(1)

Ben van der Veer(60)Veer(61)

 Non-executive Director(1)(3)(4) 

Board(1)(3)(4)

Member of the Supervisory Board(1)(3)(4)

 

Non-executive

Director(1)

 Member of the Supervisory Board

Jans van der Woude(48)Woude(49)

    Member of the Management Board

 

(1)Member of the Audit Committees of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc.

 

(2)Member of the Remuneration Committee of the Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc.

 

(3)Member of the joint Nominations Committee of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

 

(4)Member of the joint Corporate Governance Committee of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

 

(5)Senior independent non-executive director, as defined by the Combined Code onUK Corporate Governance Code in the United Kingdom.

Mark Armour stepped down as Chief Financial Officer in November 2012 and retired from the Reed Elsevier Boards in December 2012.

A person described as a non-executive director of Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier Group plc or a member of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV is a director not employed by such company in an executive capacity.

Mark Armour (British) Chief Financial Officer since 1996. Non-executive director of SABMiller plc. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier as Deputy Chief Financial Officer in 1995, was a partner in Price Waterhouse. Holds an MA in Engineering from Cambridge University and qualified as a Chartered Accountant.

Jacques Billy (French) member of the Management Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV since 2002. He is Managing Director of Elsevier Finance SA, having joined that company as Finance Manager in 1999.

Rudolf van den Brink (Dutch) Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV since 2006. A former member of the managing board of ABN AMRO Bank NV and of the advisory board of Deloitte & Touche in the Netherlands. A member of the supervisory board of Akzo Nobel NV.

Mark Elliott (American) Non-executive director since 2003. Chairman of the Remuneration Committee. Chairman of QinetiQ Group plc and a non-executive director of G4S plc. Until his retirement in 2008, was general manager of IBM Global Solutions, having held a number of positions with IBM, including managing director of IBM Europe, Middle East and Africa.

Erik Engstrom (Swedish) Chief Executive Officer since 2009. Joined Reed Elsevier as Chief Executive Officer of Elsevier in 2004. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier was a partner at General Atlantic Partners. Before that was presidentPresident and chief operating officerChief Operating Officer of Random House Inc and, before its merger with Random House, presidentPresident and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Bantam Doubleday Dell, North America. Began his career as a consultant with McKinsey and servedMcKinsey. Served as a non-executive director of Eniro AB and Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA. Holds a BSc from Stockholm School of Economics, an MSc from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, and gained an MBA from Harvard Business School as a Fulbright Scholar.

Anthony Habgood (British) Chairman since 2009. Chairman of the NominationNominations and Corporate Governance Committees. Chairman of Whitbread plc and of Preqin Holding Limited. Was chairman of Bunzl plc and of Mölnlycke HealthcareHealth Care Limited and served as chief executive of Bunzl plc, chief executive of Tootal Group plc and a director of The Boston Consulting Group Inc. Formerly non-executive director of Geest plc; Marks and Spencer plc; National Westminster Bank plc; Powergen plc; and SVG Capital plc. Holds an MA in Economics from Cambridge University and an MS in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University. He is a visiting Fellow at Oxford University.

Adrian Hennah (British) Non-executive director since 2011. He is chief financial officer of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc having been chief financial officer of Smith & Nephew plc.plc from 2006 to 2012. Before that was chief financial officer of Invensys plc havingand previously held various senior finance and management positions within GlaxoSmithKline for 18 years.

Lisa Hook (American) Non-executive director since 2006. President and chief executive officer of Neustar Inc. A director of The Ocean Foundation. Was president and chief executive officer at Sun Rocket Inc. Before that was president of AOL Broadband, Premium and Developer Services. Prior to joining AOL, was a founding partner at Brera Capital Partners LLC. Previously was chief operating officer of Time Warner Telecommunications. Has served as senior advisor to the Federal Communications Commission Chairman and a senior counsel to Viacom Cable.

Gerben de Jong (Dutch) member of the Management Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV since 2007. Previously held senior finance positions in Royal Philips Electronics NV Group.

Marike van Lier Lels (Dutch) Appointed January 2010. Member of the supervisory boards of KPN NV, USG People NV and TKH Group NV and Maersk BV.NV. A member of various Dutch governmental advisory boards. Member of the Supervisory Board of Maersk BV until March 2012. Was executive vice president and chief operating officer of the Schiphol Group. Prior to joining Schiphol Group, was a member of the executive board of Deutsche Post Euro Express and held various senior positions with Nedlloyd.

Duncan Palmer (British and American) Chief Financial Officer since November 2012. Joined Reed Elsevier as Chief Financial Officer Designate in August 2012. Non-executive director of Oshkosh Corporation since 2011. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier was chief financial officer and senior vice president of Owens Corning Inc. from 2007, having previously held various senior finance positions within Royal Dutch Shell for 20 years in the UK, the Netherlands and the US. He holds an MA in mathematics from Cambridge University and an MBA from Stanford University. He is a UK-qualified Chartered Management Accountant.

Robert Polet (Dutch) Non-executive director since 2007. Chairman of Safilo Group S.p.A. and a non-executive director of Philip Morris International Inc; Wilderness Holdings Limited andInc, William Grant & Sons Limited.Limited and Crown Topco Limited, parent company of Vertu. Member of the supervisory board of Nyenrode Foundation. Was President and chief executive officer of Gucci Group from 2004 to 2011, having spent 26 years at Unilever working in a variety of marketing and senior executive positions throughout the world including president of Unilever’s Worldwide Ice Cream and Frozen Foods division. Formerly a non-executive director of Wilderness Holdings Limited from 2010 to 2012.

Sir David Reid (British) Non-executive director since 2003. Senior independent director. Chairman of Intertek Group plc.plc and a member of the Senior Advisory Board of Jefferies, the global investment banking firm. Was Chairman of Tesco PLC from 2004 to 2011, having previously been executive deputy chairman until December 2003, and finance director from 1985 to 1997. He has also been Chairman of Kwik-Fit and previously a non-executive director of De Vere PLC, Legal & General Group plc and Westbury PLC.

Alberto Romaneschi (Swiss) Member of the Management Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV since October 2012. He has been the Managing Director of Elsevier Finance SA since 2012.

Linda Sanford (American) Non-executive director since 2012. Senior Vice President, Enterprise Transformation, IBM Corporation and non-executive director of ITT Corporation until May 2013. Serves on the board of directors of The Business Council of New York State and the Partnership for New York City. Also serves on the board of trustees of the State University of New York, St. John’s University, and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Ben van der Veer (Dutch) Non-executive director since 2009. Chairman of the Audit Committee.Committees. Member of the supervisory boards of AEGON NV, TomTom NV, Siemens Nederland NV and Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV. Was chairman of the executive board of KPMG in the Netherlands and a member of the management committee of the KPMG International board until his retirement in 2008, having joined KPMG in 1976.

Jans van der Woude (Dutch) memberMember of the Management Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV since 2009. Is Company Secretary and Legal Counsel of Reed Elsevier NV. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier in 2009 was Legal Advisor to Corporate Express NV. Before that was Corporate Legal Director of TNT NV, having previously been General Counsel at Getronics NV.

SENIOR MANAGEMENT

The executive officers of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc, other than directors, at February 15, 201227, 2013 were:

Henry Udow:    Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier Group plc. A US and British citizen who is admitted to the Bar of New York State. Joined Reed Elsevier in March 2011. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier he was Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary of Cadbury plc.

Ian Fraser:Global Human Resources Director of Reed Elsevier Group plc. Joined Reed Elsevier in 2005. Prior to joining Reed Elsevier, he was Human Resources Director at BHP Billiton plc and, before that, held senior positions in human resources at Charter plc and Woolworths plc.

Jans van der Woude:Company Secretary and Legal Counsel of Reed Elsevier NV. A Dutch lawyer. Joined Reed Elsevier in January 2009.

COMPENSATION

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

Remuneration Committee Terms of Reference and Constitution

The Remuneration Committee’s (“the Committee”)(the Committee) remit and its duties are in relation to:

 

  

Executive Directors:

 

  

to establish the remuneration policy for the executive directors and determine the remuneration in all its forms (including pensions and share plan participation), the terms of the service contracts and all other terms and conditions of employment of the executive directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc;plc and Reed Elsevier PLC and on the advice of the Chairman, the remuneration terms of the CEO (with respect to Reed Elsevier NV, the Committee recommends to the Supervisory Board the remuneration policy and the remuneration in all its forms for the CEO and other executive directors); and

 

  

to approve any compensation or termination payments made to executive directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Reed Elsevier PLC.

 

  

Senior Management

 

  

on the advice of the Chief Executive Officer,CEO, to approve the remuneration policy of other senior leaders and of the Reed Elsevier Group plc Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary; and

 

  

to monitor the level and structure of remuneration for this group of executives.

 

  

Reed Elsevier Chairman

 

  

on the advice of the Senior Independent Director, to determine the remuneration of the Reed Elsevier Chairman (with respect to Reed Elsevier NV, to recommend, on advice of the Senior Independent Director, to the Combined Board the Chairman’s remuneration in respect of his Chairmanship of Reed Elsevier NV).

 

  

General

 

  

to review the ongoing appropriateness and relevance of the remuneration policy, in particular the performance-relatedperformance- related elements and their compatibility with risk policies and systems;

 

  

to review and recommend amendments to the rules of all share-based incentive plans including the formulation of suitable performance conditions for share-based awards and options, and where necessary, to submit them for approval by shareholders;

 

  

to maintain an open and ongoing dialogue with institutional investors on major remuneration policy issues; and

  

to discharge its duties with due regard to any published corporate governance guidelines, codes or recommendations regarding the remuneration of directors of listed companies and formation and operation of share schemes which the Committee considers relevant or appropriate including, but not limited to, the UK and Dutch Corporate Governance Codes.

A copy of the terms of reference of the Committee can be found on the Reed Elsevier website www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Throughout 2011,2012, the Committee consisted of independent non-executive directors, as defined by the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Dutch Corporate Governance Code;directors; Mark Elliott (Committee Chairman), Sir David Reid, Lisa Hook and Robert Polet; and the Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary also attends the meetings in his capacity as secretary to the Committee. At the invitation of the Committee Chairman, the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc attends appropriate parts of the meetings. The CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc is not in attendance during discussions pertaining to his remuneration.

The Global Human Resources Director provided material advice to the Committee during the year.

Towers Watson acted as external advisors to the Committee throughout 20112012 and also provided market data and data analysis. Towers Watson also provided actuarial and other human resources consultancy services directly to some Reed Elsevier companies.

The individual consultants involved in advising the Committee do not provide advice to the executive directors or act on their behalf.

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Remuneration philosophy and policy

The context for Reed Elsevier’s remuneration policy and practices is set by the needs of a global business with business areas that operate internationally by line of business. Furthermore, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV’s respective stock market listings in London and Amsterdam, combined with the majority of its employees being based in the US, provides a particular set of challenges in the design and operation of remuneration policy.

Our remuneration philosophy

Reed Elsevier’s guiding remuneration philosophy for senior executives is based on the following precepts:

 

  

Performance-related compensation with demanding performance standards.

 

  

Creation of shareholder value.

 

  

Competitive remuneration opportunity to attract and retain the best executive talent from anywhere in the world.

 

  

A balanced mix of remuneration between fixed and variable elements, and annual and longer termlonger-term performance.

 

  

Aligning the interests of executive directors with shareholders and other stakeholders.

Operating the company consistent with long-term sustainability.

Our remuneration policy

In line with this guiding philosophy our remuneration policy is described below.

 

  

Reed Elsevier aims to provide a total remuneration package that is able to attract and retain the best executive talent from anywhere in the world, at an appropriate level of cost.

 

  

In reaching decisions on executive remuneration, the Committee takes into account the remuneration arrangements and levels of increase applicable to senior management and Reed Elsevier employees generally. The Committee takes into account the salary increases for the employee population worldwide as one of the inputs when determining salary increases for directors.

 

  

The Committee considers the social, governance, and environmental implications of its decisions, particularly when setting and assessing performance objectives and targets, and seeks to ensure that incentives are consistent with the appropriate management of risk.risk and corporate sustainability.

  

Total targeted remuneration of senior executives will be competitive with that of executives in similar positions in comparable companies, which includes global sector peers and companies of similar scale and international complexity.

 

  

Competitiveness is assessed in terms of total remuneration (i.e. salary, annual and multi-year incentives and benefits).

 

  

The intention is to provide total remuneration that reflects sustained individual and business performance; i.e. median performance will be rewarded by total remuneration that is positioned around the median of relevant market data and upper quartile performance by upper quartile total remuneration.

 

  

The Committee will consider all available discretion to claw back any payouts made, or to reduce unvested awards, on the basis of materially misstated data. With effect from 2009, theThe rules of all incentive plans were amended to provide for specific provisions in this regard.

 

  

The Committee considers it important to encourage personal investment and ongoing holding of Reed Elsevier PLC and/or Reed Elsevier NV securities among the senior executive population. Executive directors and other senior executives are subject to minimum shareholding requirements.

How the performance measures in the incentives link to our business strategy

OurReed Elsevier’s strategic focus is on transforming its core business through organic investment and the organic build out of new products into adjacent markets and geographies, supplemented by selective portfolio acquisitions and divestments.

The performance related components of the executive directors’ multi-year incentives support this strategy by focusing on return on capital, returns to shareholders and sustained earnings growth.

Furthermore, our annual incentive plan is focused on operational excellence as measured by the financial measures of revenue, profit and cash generation. In addition, a significant portion of the annual bonus is dependent upon the achievement of annual key

performance objectives (KPOs) that create a platform for sustainable future performance. These KPOs align with Reed Elsevier’s strategic plans and range from the delivery of specific projects and the achievement of customer metrics or efficiency targets to corporate and social responsibility objectives. Each executive director has at least one sustainability or corporate responsibility objective.

The Committee believes that one of the main drivers of long termlong-term shareholder value is sustained growth in profitability, underpinned by appropriate capital discipline. Therefore growth in earnings per share and targeted return on invested capital are both utilised in our multi-year incentives.

We aim to set challenging performance targets as demonstrated by the fact that there has been no vesting for directors under any of our multi-year incentives since the awards granted in 2006 vested in 2009, and no directors’ bonuses paid out above target since 2009.

The balance between fixed and performance-related pay

We aim to provide each executive director with an annual total remuneration package comprising fixed and variable pay with the majority of an executive director’s total remuneration package linked to performance. At target performance, incentive pay makes up approximately 70% of the total remuneration package, withpackage. For the CEO, the annual incentive representingrepresents around 20% and the multi-year incentiveincentives 50% of the total package. The fixed pay element for the CEO is around 30% (salary of around 20% and 10% pension and other benefits). The core components of the total remuneration package are described in detail in the remainder of this Report.

Our approach to market positioning and benchmarking

TheWhen reviewing executive director and senior executive remuneration, one factor which the Committee takes into account is market competitiveness ofcompetitiveness. This is done by assessing total remuneration (i.e. salary, annual and multi-year incentives and benefits) is assessed against a range of relevant comparator groups as follows:

 

  

Global peers operating in businesses similar to those of Reed Elsevier (including Thomson Reuters, WPP, Pearson, John Wiley, Wolters Kluwer, Dun & Bradstreet, Experian, McGraw-Hill UBM, DMGT, Informa, Lagardère and FICO)Equifax).

 

  

Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (cross-industry but excluding those in the financial services sector) of a similar size (measured by aggregate market capitalisation) and international scope.

 

  

Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (cross-industry but excluding those in the financial services sector) of a similar size (measured by aggregate market capitalisation) and international scope.

 

  

Companies listed on the NYSE Euronext Amsterdam Stock Exchange, cross-industry and of a similar size (measured by aggregate market capitalisation) and international scope.

Referring to companies listed in these three different locations is relevant and necessary as demonstrated by the fact that several recent senior executive hires have been recruited from the US including our CFO.

The composition of the respective comparator groups is subject to minor changes year on year reflecting changes in the size, international scope and listing status of specific companies during the year.

The competitiveness of our remuneration packages is assessed by the Committee as part of the annual review cycle for pay and performance, in line with the process set out below.

 

  

First, the overall competitiveness of the total remuneration packages is assessed both against the market and taking account of remuneration levels within Reed Elsevier more widely. The appropriate positioning of an individual’s total remuneration against the market is determined based on the Committee’s judgement of individual performance and potential.

 

  

The Committee then considers market data and benchmarks for the different elements of the package including salary, total annual cash and total remuneration. While relevant benchmark information is a meaningful input to the process, they informit informs rather than drivedrives the outcome of the review.

If itreview and is determinedjust one factor that a total remuneration competitive gap exists, the Committee believes that this should be addressed via a review of performance-linked compensation elements in the first instance.considers.

 

  

Benefits, including medical and retirement benefits, are positioned to reflect local country practice.

The total remuneration package

Each element of the remuneration package for executive directors is designed to achieve specific objectives, as described in this section. In aggregate, they create a unified and balanced reward mix and competitive employment proposition. The value of the reward package is only maximised through the integrated delivery of annual and longer termlonger-term performance. Reward for the delivery of business results is connected with reward for value flowing to shareholders. Through the use of a range of performance metrics such as earnings per share, return on invested capital, profit after tax, revenue, cash flow conversion rate, personal objectives and total shareholder return and the assessment of performance over multiple time-horizons, the incentive arrangements are structured in such a way that reward cannot be maximised through inappropriate short termshort-term risk-taking.

The table below summarises the component parts of the remuneration package provided in 2012 to the executive directors during 2011. This includes the bonuses earned for performance during 2011, payouts received from and awards granted under the multi-year incentives during the year.who served in 2012.

 

Component

    

Erik Engstrom

  

Mark ArmourArmour**

Duncan Palmer***

Base salary

    £1,025,0001,050,625  £628,776644,495£600,000

Retirement benefit

    UK defined benefit plan  UK defined benefit planUK defined contribution plan and cash supplement

Other benefits

    Includes company car or cash allowance and private medical benefit  Includes company car or cash allowance and private medical benefitIncludes car allowance and private medical benefit

Annual incentive

(earned for 2012 and payable in March 2013)

    £1,021,9251,149,909  £611,799

(earned for 2011 and

payable in March 2012)

693,799
  £230,205

Multi-year incentives grantedgranted*

  
 ESOS  Market value options over 139,146198,836 PLC and 92,953139,742 NV ordinary sharesn/a  Market value options over 85,35867,331 PLC and 57,02148,018 NV ordinary shares
  BIP  61,17668,475 NV ADRs  56,87690,987 PLC and 37,68721,028 NV ordinary shares
Multi-year incentives vested(2008-10 cycle)  LTIPLapsedLapsedn/a
  ESOSPSP  Lapsedn/a  Lapsedn/a179,551 PLC shares

Shareholding requirement

    300% of salary  200% of salary200% of salary

Policy in relation to the individual remuneration elements is described in greater detail in the remainder of this section.

*No multi-year incentives vested in 2012. Multi-year incentives from previous years lapsed in early 2012 as already described in last year’s Report.

**Mark Armour served as a director until December 31, 2012.

***Additional awards were made to Duncan Palmer in conjunction with his recruitment. Further details are contained on pages 52 and 53.

Base Salary

Salary reflects the role and the sustained value of the executive in terms of skills, experience and contribution in the context of the relevant market.

Salaries for executive directors are reviewed annually in the context of the competitiveness of total remuneration and Reed Elsevier’s guidelines for wages and salaries agreed for the whole of Reed Elsevier for the forthcoming financial year. Any increases typically take effect on January 1.

The Committee decided to award a salary increase of 2.5% to each executive directorErik Engstrom, which increased his base salariessalary with effect from January 1, 20122013 to £1,050,625£1,076,891. Duncan Palmer’s service agreement provides that his first salary review following commencement of employment would be on or around January 1, 2014, so his base salary remains unchanged for Erik Engstrom and £644,495 for Mark Armour.2013. In determining the salary recommendation for executive directors,the CEO, the Committee considered, among other inputs, 20122013 salary guidance for Reed Elsevier’s most significant employee locations globally. The salary recommendations forincrease awarded to the executive directors areCEO is within the guidelines agreed for those employees in respect of 20122013 increases.

In respect of salaries for the broader employee population, Reed Elsevier uses the same factors to determine the levels of increase across all employee populations globally: i.e. relevant pay market, skills, experience and contribution. Reed Elsevier operates across many diverse countries in terms of their remuneration structures and practices. Any increases awarded to different employee groups in different geographies reflect this diversity and range of practices. An average increase of approximately 2.5% on average will be awarded across the senior management population globally for 2012.2013. This level of increase is in line with increases provided to the wider employee population.

Annual Incentive

The Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) provides focus on the delivery of stretching annual financial targets and the achievement of annual objectives and milestones that create a platform for sustainable future performance.

For 2012,2013, executive directors have a target bonus opportunity of 100% of salary that is weighted as follows across four elements (unchanged from 2011)2012):

 

Measure

  Weighting

— Revenue

  3030%

— Adjusted Profit After Tax

  3030%

— Cash Flow Conversion Rate

  1010%

— Key Performance Objectives (KPOs)

  3030%

The target bonus opportunity for the financial measures is payable for the achievement of highly stretching financial targets. The four elements are measured separately, such that there could be a payout on one element and not on others.

For 2012,2013, the minimum threshold on the financial elements of the AIP at which a bonus starts to accrue is 94% of target achievement and the maximum bonus is 150% of target (unchanged from 2011), although, the Committee decided to slightly adjust the payout slope for financials between threshold and maximum to align executive directors with other executives and employees. This means that part of the bonus will accrue for achieving threshold whilst a higher level of out-performance will be required to achieve the maximum bonus.2012).

The KPOs are individual to each executive director. Each executive director is set up to six KPOs to reflect critical business priorities for which he is accountable. The KPO component for the executive directors and other senior executives will contain at least one KPO relating to the achievement of specific sustainability objectives and targets contained within Reed Elsevier’s corporate responsibility agenda.

Against each objective, measurable milestone targets are set for the year. All financial targets and KPOs are approved by the Committee and are subject to formal assessment at the end of each year. The Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of performance against KPOs for the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc to the Committee while the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of KPO performance for the CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Committee then discusses and agrees the final KPO score for each executive director.

AIP Payments for 20112012

In assessing the level of bonus payments for 2011,2012, the Committee noted the following performances:

 

   % change over 20102011 at constant
exchange rates
   Underlying
revenue  growth
  Total
adjusted

PAT

Reed Elsevier

  +2%4%  +6%8%

Reed Elsevier continuedexecuted well on its positivestrategic and financial priorities in 2012. Positive revenue momentum in 2011. All five business areas contributedand focus on operating efficiency combined to underlying revenue growth, excluding biennial exhibition cycling, withlift underlying operating profits showing good growth.profit growth and earnings. Underlying revenues, which exclude the effects of currency translationstranslation and acquisitions and disposals, were up 2%4%, or 3% excluding the cycling effect of biennial exhibitions, reflecting a consistent performance from our subscription and online data businesses. Adjustedall five business areas contributed to the underlying growth. Underlying adjusted operating profits were up 4% at constant currencies. Total6%, with the improvement in profitability driven by a combination of process innovation and portfolio development across all business areas. Underlying costs including acquisitionswere up 4%, reflecting volume growth as well as organic investment in new product development and disposals, fellsales & marketing, partly offset by 2% at constant exchange rates and adjusted operating margins at 27.1% were 1.4 percentage points higher than last year.continued improvements in process efficiency. Adjusted operating cash flow was flat£1,603m (2011: £1,515m), up 6% compared with the prior year or down 1%and up 7% at constant currencies. The lower levelrate of conversion of adjusted operating profits into cash flow conversion reflects among other things, higher capital expenditure through increased investment in new products and related infrastructure in 2011.was 94% (2011: 93%). Returns on invested capital increased to 11.2%11.9%, 0.60.7 percentage points higher than in 2010,2011, reflecting improvements inthe improved trading performance strong cash flow and capital efficiency.

Overall,Set out below is a summary of the outcome of performance against each financial measure:

Revenue

Just above target

Adjusted Profit After Tax

Just above target

Cash Flow Conversion Rate

Just above target

The progress on personal objectives for each director was then added in the form of the KPO score and, overall, the sum of the individual scores achieved against the four AIP components was close to target for boththe executive directors, resultingresulted in the following bonuses for 2011:2012:

 

    2011
annual  bonus
(to be paid in March 2012)
   % of
2011  base
salary earnings
 

Erik Engstrom

  £1,021,925     99.7%  

Mark Armour

  £611,799     97.3%  
2012 annual bonus
(to be paid in March 2013)
% of
2012 base
salary earnings

Erik Engstrom

£1,149,909109.5%

Mark Armour

£693,799107.7%

Duncan Palmer*

£230,205107.7%

*DuncanPalmer’s bonus reflects service during the year of reporting. His service commenced on August 24, 2012.

Multi-Year Incentives

TheIt is intended to continue to provide executive directors with multi-year incentives comprisecomprising a combination of a long-term incentive plan (LTIP), a personal investment bonus deferral plan (BIP) and market value options (ESOS). To this end, a new LTIP and ESOS are proposed and will be presented for shareholder approval at the Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP), the Bonus Investment Plan (BIP), the Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) and the Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)2013 Annual General Meetings (AGMs).

The purpose of the multi-year incentives is to provide focus on the delivery of the medium to longer termlonger-term strategy and holding executives accountable for the deliveryexecution of that strategy while driving value creation through sustained financial performance, capital discipline and the delivery of returns for shareholders.

In addition, the multi-year incentives are structured so as to encourage personal investment and require a minimum level of ongoing shareholding in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV securities among the senior executive population in order to promote alignment with shareholders and to provide focus on the share price.

Awards under the current and proposed multi-year incentives take the form of restricted shares and market value options which typically vest over a period of three years, except for the one-off REGP under which awards vest over three and five years. The vesting of all awards made to executive directors under these plans is subject to meeting a number of stretching performance targets based on internal financial metrics and total shareholder return. Additionally, in the case of ESOS, a financial pre-grant performance condition applies which determines the annual size of the available grant pool for all participants in the plan.

Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP)

The key featuresdetails of how the REGP are summarised below.operates have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports.

Feature

Detail

Frequency of award

One-off arrangement
Awards were made on May 26, 2010

Eligibility

CEO and CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc
As a condition of participation, the executive directors were required to hold Reed Elsevier securities on the date of grant to the value of 300% of salary in the case of the CEO and 200% of salary in the case of the CFO. Any personal shares invested under the BIP did not count towards this holding requirement
The executive directors are required to maintain shareholdings at the respective levels throughout the life of the plan (i.e. for five years) or until such time as they cease to be eligible for further payouts under the plan, if earlier

Performance period

Five years split into an initial period of three financial years followed by a further two financial years
Opportunity to receive partial payout after three years

Performance conditions

Relative TSR measured against three comparator groups, adjusted EPS and ROIC (see section entitled ‘Performance measures and targets’)
The performance metrics have equal weighting, with one third of the award vesting based on performance against the respective metric (additive measurement)

Vesting scale

Performance hurdle and scaled vesting

Cap

The number of shares capable of vesting is capped at 150% of the number comprised in the initial performance share award

Dividend equivalents

Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance period and are paid out in cash when the shares are released, to the extent that the underlying securities vest

Other provisions

On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis and subject to performance based on an assessment of progress against targets at the time the change of control occurs
Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with shares purchased in the market

Performance measures and targets

Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to Reed Elsevier’s TSR performance compared against three comparator groups (the TSR tranche).

As Reed Elsevier accesses equity capital markets through three exchanges — London, Amsterdam and New York — in three separate currency zones, three distinct comparator groups are used — a Sterling Comparator Group, a Euro Comparator Group and a US Dollar Comparator Group. The TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (based on the

London listing) is measured against the Sterling Comparator Group; the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (based on the Amsterdam listing) is measured against the Euro Comparator Group; and the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRs (based on the New York listing) is measured against the US Dollar Comparator Group. The averaging period applied for TSR measurement purposes is six months prior to the start of the financial year in which the award was made and the final six months of the last financial year of the performance period.

TSR performance of each security is measured separately against each comparator group and the proportion of the TSR tranche that vests is the sum of the payouts achieved against the three comparator groups.

TSR ranking within the relevant

TSR comparator group

  3 year period: 2010-12
vesting percentage of
each third of the TSR
tranche
 5 year period: 2010-14
vesting percentage of
each third of the TSR
tranche

Below median

  0% 0%

Median

  30% 30%

Upper quartile

  100% 100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for ranking between the median and the upper quartile.

TSR comparators groups

The constituents of each comparator group were selected on the following basis:a specific basis, as described in last year’s Report (page 49).

Companies included in the relevant market index as at December 31, 2009 and nearest in size to Reed Elsevier in terms of market capitalisation.

The relevant market indices are: (1) FTSE 100 for the Sterling Comparator Group; (2) Euronext 100 and the DAX 30 for the Euro Comparator Group; and (3) the S&P 500 for the US Dollar Comparator Group.

The following companiesThe comparators which were excluded for this purpose:

companies with mainly domestic revenues (as they do not reflect the global nature of Reed Elsevier’s customer base);

those engaged in extractive industries (as they are exposed to commodity cycles); and

financial services companies (as they have a different risk/reward profile).

Relevant listed global peers operating in businesses similar to those of Reed Elsevier not otherwise included were added to the relevant comparator group.

Set out below are the comparators included in each currency group applicable to awards made in 2010 under the REGP.are set on page 50 of last year’s Report.

STERLING COMPARATOR GROUP*

EURO COMPARATOR GROUP*

US DOLLAR COMPARATOR GROUP*

AGGREKO

ACCOR3M

ASTRAZENECA

ADIDASADOBE SYSTEMS

AUTONOMY CORP.

AHOLDAGILENT TECHS.

BAE SYSTEMS

AIR LIQUIDEAIR PRDS. & CHEMS.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

AKZO NOBELAMAZON.COM

BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO

ALSTOMANALOG DEVICES

BUNZL

ASML HOLDINGAPPLIED MATS.

BURBERRY GROUP

BASFAVON PRODUCTS

COBHAM

BMWBAXTER INTL.

COMPASS GROUP

CARREFOURBECTON DICKINSON

DMGT

CHRISTIAN DIORCATERPILLAR

DIAGEO

DAIMLERCOLGATE-PALMOLIVE

EXPERIAN

DEUTSCHE POSTCORNING

GLAXOSMITHKLINE

EADSCUMMINS

INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS

ESSILOR INTL.DEERE

IMPERIAL TOBACCO GROUP

HEINEKENDOW CHEMICAL

INFORMA

HERMES INTL.DUN & BRADSTREET

INMARSAT

K + SE. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS

INTERNATIONAL POWER

LAFARGEEBAY

INTERTEK GROUP

LAGARDÈRE GROUPEEMERSON ELECTRIC

INVENSYS

LINDEFICO

JOHNSON MATTHEY

LVMHFORD MOTOR

KINGFISHER

MANGENZYME

NATIONAL GRID

METROH.J. HEINZ

PEARSON

MICHELINILLINOIS TOOL WORKS

RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP

PERNOD-RICARDJOHN WILEY

REXAM

PHILIPS ELTN. KONINKLIJKEJOHNSON CONTROLS

ROLLS-ROYCE GROUP

PORTUGAL TELECOM SGPSJUNIPER NETWORKS

SABMILLER

PPRLIFE TECHNOLOGIES

SAGE GROUP

RENAULTMCDONALDS

SHIRE

SAINT-GOBAINMCGRAW-HILL

SMITH & NEPHEW

SAPMICRON TECHNOLOGY

SMITHS GROUP

SCHNEIDER ELECTRICMOTOROLA

THOMAS COOK GROUP

SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENTNEWS CORP

TUI TRAVEL

THALESNIKE

UNILEVER (LSE)

THYSSENKRUPPNVIDIA

UNITED BUSINESS MEDIA

TNTPACCAR

VODAFONE

UNILEVER (AEX)PPG INDUSTRIES

WOLSELEY

VALLOURECSPECTRA ENERGY

WPP

VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENTTEXAS INSTS.
VOLKSWAGENTHOMSON REUTERS (NYSE)
WOLTERS KLUWERUNITED TECHNOLOGIES
YUM! BRANDS

*Reflects the composition of the comparator group as at the date of grant.

Return on invested capital (ROIC)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to the percentage return on invested capital of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (the ROIC tranche) as follows:

 

3 years: 2010-12

  

2 years: 2013-14

  

Vesting percentage

of ROIC tranche

  2 years: 2013-14  Vesting percentage
of ROIC tranche

ROIC in 2012,

subject to actual

exceeding 2009

ROIC calculated on

the same basis

  ROIC in 2014   

ROIC in 2012

subject to actual

exceeding 2009

ROIC calculated on

the same basis

  ROIC in 2014   

Below 10.2%

  Below 10.7%  0%  Below 10.7%  0%

10.2%

  10.7%  60%  10.7%  60%

11.2% or above

  12.7% or above  100%  12.7% or above  100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels.

For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

 

  

Invested capital = arithmetic average of the opening and closing capital employed for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses for the financial year with all cumulative amortisation and impairment charges for acquired intangible assets and goodwill added back. In addition, any exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges (net of tax) are capitalised for these purposes and changes in exchange rates and movements in pension deficits are excluded.

 

  

Return = adjusted operating profit for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges. In addition, it is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures and further adjusted to exclude net pension financing credit movement, after applying the effective rate of tax used for adjusted earnings calculations and using exchange rates to match those used in the calculation of invested capital.

In order to ensure that the performance score achieved is a fair reflection of underlying business performance, the Committee retains discretion to determine the treatment of major disposals and acquisitions that require board approval. Any significant adjustments made to the final performance score will be disclosed to shareholders.

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to performance against growth in adjusted earnings per share measured at constant currencies (Adjusted EPS) (the EPS tranche) as follows:

 

3 years: 2010-12

  2 years: 2013-14  

Vesting percentage
of EPS tranche

Average Adjusted EPS

growth in years 2011 and

2012 (subject to average Adjusted EPS growth over the whole three year period being positive)

  Average Adjusted EPS

growth over

the two year period

   

Below 5% p.a.

  Below 7% p.a.  0%

5% p.a.

  7% p.a.  60%

9% p.a. or above

  13% p.a. or above  100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels.

For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

 

  

Earnings = adjusted reported earnings measured at constant currencies. Adjustments include amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges, gains/losses on business disposals and related tax effects.rate anomalies (deferred tax). The Committee retains discretion to adjust for changes in the net pension financing credit.

 

  

Number of shares = weighted average number of shares in issue excluding shares held in treasury.

Performance share awards were granted under the REGP to Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these share awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and other relevant factors. Based on a review of the three performance measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 66.8% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on a TSR ranking of just above median in respect of two of the comparator groups, ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and acquisition integration costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth slightly above the middle of the range specified in the plan.

This would result in 429,710 PLC ordinary shares and 282,187 NV ordinary shares vesting in respect of Erik Engstrom. 50% of these shares will be released to Mr Engstrom following the April Committee meeting and 50% of these shares will be deferred until 2015. In respect of Mr Armour, under the terms of the plan relating to retirement, 100% of the shares vesting will be released to him following the April Committee meeting. In accordance with the preliminary vesting calculations, this will result in 263,601 PLC ordinary shares and 173,105 NV ordinary shares being released to Mr Armour. Thereafter, Mr Armour will have no further entitlement for payment under this plan. Dividend equivalents will be payable in cash on any shares released which, based on the preliminary calculations, would result in payments of £135,251 and €179,329 to Mr Engstrom and £165,937 and €220,016 to Mr Armour.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

No awards under LTIP were made to executive directors in 2012 and no award cycles remain outstanding for directors under this plan.

A multi-yearlong-term incentive award was granted to senior leaders below the Board in 2011.2012. Grants under the plan are made on a rolling three-yearthree year basis and awards are in the form of performance shares that vest subject to the same performance metrics and vesting scales applicable toconsistent with the REGP and theREGP. The targets set for each metric are aligned to the five-year performance scale applicable to the executive directors under the REGP.

Subject to receipt of shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual General Meetings, it is intended to commence making annual grants under a new long-term incentive plan to executive directors from 2013 onwards, under which the first awards would vest in H1 2016, which is the year after the vesting of the second and final tranche of the REGP for the CEO, so there will be no overlapping payouts. The LTIP was required by the need to replace the one-off REGP incentive plan for directors with a more regular long-term.

Details of the proposed new LTIP are described in the 2013 notices of Annual General Meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS)

The current ESOS, which was approved by shareholders in 2003, expires on April 8, 2013. A replacement ESOS, for which we are seeking shareholder approval at the Annual General Meetings in April 2013, is described in the notices of Annual General Meetings and it is intended to make grants under this plan to the executive directors in 2013. It is not intended to make any further grants under the existing ESOS, the key features of the ESOS are summarised below.

Feature

Detail

Frequency of award

Annual grant of market value options

Eligibility

Broadest multi-year incentive operated by Reed Elsevier
Annual awards are made to approximately 1,000 employees across some 20+ countries including the executive directors

Vesting period

Three years from the date of grant
Options are exercisable between three and ten years from the date of grant or on cessation of employment (for defined categories of approved leavers), if earlier

Performance conditions

Pre-grant performance condition of adjusted EPS growth which determines the size of the annual grant pool available for grants to all participants (see below)
Post-grant performance hurdle of adjusted EPS growth applicable to the vesting of awards to executive directors

Cap

Maximum annual award (in terms of the aggregate market value of the shares under option at the date of grant) of three times salary per executive director

Other provisions

On a change of control, awards vest subject to performance based on an assessment of progress against targets at the time the change of control occurs; participants may exchange their awards for awards in the acquiring company, if available
Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with newly issued shares

The size of the total grant pool available for all participantswhich were described in a given year is determined basedlast year’s Report on growth in average compound adjusted EPS measured in constant currencies (adjusted EPS) over the three years prior to grant as follows:

Average Adjusted EPS growth p.a.

over the three years prior to grant

% of the 2003 grant  pool
available for distribution

Less than 6%

  50%

6% or more but less than 8%

  75%

8% or more but less than 10%

100%

10% or more but less than 12%

125%

12% or more

150%

Adjusted EPS growth for the three years ended December 31, 2011 was less than 6% p.a. which means that the available grant pool for ESOS awards in 2012 is 50% of the 2003 pool.page 52.

During 2011 the executive directors each2012, Erik Engstrom received a grant of 150%200% of base salary of market value options (50%(two-thirds of the permitted maximum). On joining, Duncan Palmer received a grant of 135% of salary. The vesting of the awardoptions is subject to an Adjusted EPS growth hurdle of 6% p.a.

During compound growth in adjusted earnings per share hurdle, measured over a three year period commencing on January 1 of the year of grant (the same condition also applies to the 2008-102011 ESOS grants which were made to Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour). In view of his retirement at the end of 2012, Mr Armour did not receive an ESOS grant in 2012.

Early in 2012, as disclosed in last year’s Report, the 2009-11 cycle of ESOS lapsed for executive directors as a result of EPS performance being below the threshold required for vesting. Prior to the date of this report, the Committee determined that the 2009-11 cycle of ESOS also lapsed for executive directors as the adjusted EPS growth hurdle of 8% p.a. on vesting was not achieved.Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour.

Bonus Investment Plan (BIP)

The bonus investment planBIP is a voluntary plan aimed at encouraging personal investment in, and ongoing holding of, Reed Elsevier shares to promote greater alignment with shareholders and support the retention of key talent. The current bonus investment plan was approved by shareholders at the 2010 Annual General Meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV and replaced the bonus investment plan implemented in 2003.

Under the BIP, participants may invest their own funds to purchase Reed Elsevier securities or allocate securities already owned outright for investment under the plan up to a specified maximum. In return, the participant is granted a matching award which vests over three years subject to performance (i.e. a maximum match of 1 for 1 can be earned on the personal investment). It is a condition of vesting that the underlying personal investment is retained throughout the vesting period. Dividend equivalents accrue on the matching shares during the vesting period and are paid out in cash at the end to the extent that the matching award vests. The table below summarises the key features of the BIP.

 

Feature

 

Detail

Frequency of award

   Annual grants of matching awards
   Ten-year life of the plan
   Implemented in 2010 with first matching awards granted in May 2010

Eligibility

   Approximately 150 senior executives including executive directors
   Participation is voluntary

Performance period

   Three financial years

Performance conditions

   Average adjusted EPS growth measured in constant currencies and ROIC (see below)
   50% of the award is subject to adjusted EPS growth and 50% subject to ROIC

Vesting scale

   Performance hurdle and scaledstraight-line vesting

Personal investment

   Up to 100% of the target bonus opportunity net of tax

Other provisions

   On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis for service and subject to performance based on an assessment of progress against targets at the time the change of control occurs, unless the Committee determines that awards should not vest and instead be exchanged for equivalent awards over shares in the acquiring company (i.e. rollover applies)
   Claw-back applies
   Awards under the plan are satisfied with shares purchased in the market

The following targets and vesting scale apply to awards granted under the BIP in 2011:2012:

 

Match earned on personal investment

  

Average growth in adjusted EPS (%) over the

3 year performance period

  ROIC (%) in the third year of
the performance period

0%

  below 4% p.a.  below 10.4%

50%

  4% p.a.  10.4%

75%

  6.5% p.a.  10.9%

100%

  9% p.a. or above  11.4% or above

The same EPS targets as set out in the table above will apply to awards of matching shares to be granted in 2012 under the 2012-14 cycle of the plan. The targets applicable to the ROIC proportion will be increased to 11.0% at threshold and 12.0% at maximum, with straight-line vesting for performance between the points. The executive directors will be eligible to participate in BIP in 2012.

Match earned on personal investment

  

Average growth in adjusted EPS (%)
over the 3 year performance period

  ROIC (%) in the third year of
the performance period

0%

  below 4% p.a.  below 11%

50%

  4% p.a.  11%

75%

  6.5% p.a.  11.5%

100%

  9% p.a. or above  12% or above

The vesting scale and performance metrics applicable to awards

Awards were granted in 2010 under the BIP areto Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, in much the same way as above, except thatfor the EPS proportion is measured over years twoREGP, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and threeother relevant factors.

Based on a review of the two performance period (i.e. 2011measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 89.5% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and 2012) withrestructuring costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth just below the 70th percentile of the target range specified in the plan.

This would result in the vesting of the EPS component being subject to average EPS growth over the whole three year vesting period being positive. The targets applicable to the ROIC proportion under the 2010-12 cycle were 0.2% lower than the targets applicable to the 2011-13 cycle,62,819 NV ADR matching awards in respect of Mr Engstrom and a corresponding cash dividend equivalent payment of $178,181. In respect of Mr Armour, 58,223 PLC ordinary shares and 38,048 NV ordinary shares would be released, with a thresholdcorresponding dividend equivalent payments of 10.2%£36,651 and maximum vesting for achieving ROIC of 11.2% or above in the third year of the performance period. Straight-line vesting applies for performance between the points.

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

No awards under LTIP were given to executive directors in 2011 and no awards will be made in 2012.

Awards under this plan were in the form of restricted shares, with half of the award being over shares in Reed Elsevier PLC and the other half over shares in Reed Elsevier NV. A three year performance period applies and awards vest based on growth in average compound adjusted EPS growth measured at constant currencies and Reed Elsevier’s TSR performance compared to a group of industry peers.

The 2008-10 cycle of LTIP lapsed during 2011 as a result of performance conditions not being met. At the date of this Report, it had also been determined that the 2009-11 cycle of LTIP had also lapsed as the minimum performance hurdle of 10% adjusted EPS growth was not met.

No further unvested award cycles remain outstanding under this plan at the date of this report.€48,359 respectively.

Shareholding requirement

The Committee believes that one of the aspects that creates closer alignment between senior management and shareholders is to require executives to build up and maintain a significant personal stake in Reed Elsevier. The shareholding requirements applicable to the executive directors are set out in the table below and as described on page 48,47, were pre-requisites to participate in the REGP. Shareholding requirements also apply to selected senior executives below the Board.

Meeting the relevant shareholding requirement is both a condition of the vesting of awards as well as a pre-requisite to maintain eligibility to receive future awards under the multi-year incentives.

On December 31, 2011,2012, the executive directors’ shareholdings were as follows (valued at the mid-market closing prices of Reed Elsevier securities):

 

  Shareholding requirement
(in %  of December 31, 2011
annualised base salary)
 Actual shareholding as  at
December 31, 2011
(in % of December 31, 2011
annualised base salary)
  Shareholding requirement
(in % of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)
 Actual shareholding as at
December 31, 2012 (in %
of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)

Erik Engstrom

  300% 396%  300% 512%

Mark Armour

  200% 376%  200% 442%

Duncan Palmer*

  200% 0%

Other employee share plans

UK-based executive directors are eligible to participate in the HMRC approved all-employee UK Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (SAYE).

*Duncan Palmer has until December 31, 2015 to build up to his required level of shareholding and must retain any net shares earned from Reed Elsevier share plans until he meets his requirement.

Retirement benefits

Retirement benefit provisions are set in the context of the total remuneration for each executive director, taking account of age and service and against the background of evolving legislation and practice in Reed Elsevier’s major countries of operation. Base salary is the only pensionable element of remuneration.

Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour areis provided with UK defined benefit pension arrangements under which they accruehe accrues a pension of 1/30th of salary for every year of service (up to a maximum of two thirds of salary). The pension is provided through a combination of:

 

  

the main UK Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme for salary restricted to a cap, determinedthe Scheme Earnings Cap (determined annually on the same basis as the pre-April 2006 Inland Revenue earnings cap,cap) and HMRC Annual Allowance, and

 

  

Reed Elsevier’s unapproved pension arrangement for salary above the cap.balance.

Prior to November 1, 2007, Erik Engstrom was not a member of any company pension scheme and Reed Elsevier made annual contributions of 19.5% of his salary to his personal pension plan. From November 1, 2007 contributions to his designated retirement account ceased and he became a member of the UK defined benefit pension arrangement.

The pension arrangements for the directorsErik Engstrom include life assurance cover while in employment, an entitlement to a pension in the event of ill health or disability and a spouse’s and/or dependants’ pension on death.

The increase in the transfer value of the directors’ pensions, after deduction of contributions, is shown in the table below. Transfer values have been calculated in accordance with the guidance note GN11 published by the UK Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries. The transfer values at December 31, 20112012 have been calculated using the transfer value basis adopted by the trustees of the pension scheme from October 1, 2008.Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme.

The transfer value in respect of individual directors represents a liability in respect of directors’ pensionspension entitlement, and is not an amount paid or payable to the director.

Mark Armour retired on December 31, 2012, at which point he became entitled to a pension of £378,785 per annum.

Transfer values of accrued pension benefits

 

  Age at
December 31,
2012
  Director’s
contributions
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2011
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase in
transfer
value during
the year
(net of
director’s
contributions)
  Accrued
annual
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
(net of
inflation)
  Transfer
value at

December 31,
2012 of
increase
in accrued
pension
during the
year

(net of
inflation

and director’s
contributions)
 

Erik Engstrom

  49   £9,158   £2,099,132   £2,730,651   £622,361   £180,958   £38,584   £31,750   £469,944  

Mark Armour

  58   £1,944   £6,758,053   £7,525,908   £765,911   £384,878 £30,355   £13,362   £259,332  

*
AgeThe reason for the difference between Mr Armour’s accrued annual pension as at
December 31,
2011
Director’s
contributions
Transfer
value
of 12.31.12, as stated in the table above, and the annual pension entitlement following retirement is that Mr Armour retired early so there was a reduction made to his accrued
annual pension as at
December 31,
2010
Transfer
Value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2011
Increase in
transfer
value during
the year
(net of
director’s
contributions)
Accrued
annual
pension at
December 31,
2011
Increase in
accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
Increase in
accrued
annual
pension
during the
year
(net of
inflation)
Transfer
value at
December 31,
2011 of
increase
in accrued
pension
during the
year (net
of inflation
and director’s
contributions)

Erik Engstrom

48£7,377£1,366,389£2,099,132£    725,366£142,375£36,799£31,732£460,465

Mark Armour

57£7,377£5,643,891£6,758,053£ 1,106,785£354,522£29,097£13,495£249,862 12.31.12.

Duncan Palmer is a member of the UK Reed Elsevier defined contribution pension plan (the Reed Elsevier Pension Plan — REPP). The company contribution is 19% of Mr Palmer’s salary. £50,000 is paid as a contribution to the REPP, being the maximum contribution which can be made under HMRC limits, and the balance is paid to him as a cash allowance, subject to deduction of income tax and national insurance. The pension arrangement for Mr Palmer includes life assurance cover while in employment.

Service contracts

Executive directors are employed under service contracts that provide for a maximum of one year’s notice. The contracts neither specify a pre-determined level of severance payment nor contain specific provisions in respect of a change in control.

The Committee believes that as a general rule, notice periods should be 12 months and that the executive directors should, subject to any legal constraints within their base country, be required to mitigate their losses in the event of termination. The Committee will, however, note local market conditions so as to ensure that the terms offered are appropriate to attract and retain top executives operating in global businesses.

The contractual terms of the executive directors (and for approximately 100 other senior executives) include certain covenants as follows:

 

  

non-competition restrictions apply which prevent the executive from working in a capacity which competes with any Reed Elsevier business which he/she was involved with during the preceding 12 months; from recruiting Reed Elsevier employees and from soliciting Reed Elsevier customers and suppliers for a period of 12 months after leaving employment;

 

  

in the event of the executive resigning, he/she will immediately lose all rights to any outstanding awards under the multi-year incentives including any vested but unexercised options; and

 

  

in the event of a breach of the covenants, any gains made or payouts received, in the period starting six months prior to and ending 12 months after leaving employment, on the vesting or exercise of awards from the multi-year incentives may be repayable.

Each executive director has a service contract with Reed Elsevier Group plc, as summarised in the table below:

 

   

Current
contract date

  Date
employment
commenced
   

Expiry date

(subject to notice
period)

  Notice period   Subject to

Erik Engstrom

  March 14, 2011   August 23, 2004    June 14, 2028   12 months    English law

Mark ArmourAmour

  October 7, 1996   February 1, 1995    RetiresCeased to be a director and retired on December 31, 2012   12 months    English law

Duncan Palmer

August 15, 2012August 24, 2012n/a12 monthsEnglish law

Mark Armour’s retirement termsDuncan Palmer’s remuneration arrangements

TheDuncan Palmer’s annual base salary on his recruitment was £600,000 and he has an annual target bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary. He will be eligible to participate in BIP from 2013 onwards up to his target bonus opportunity net of tax and to participate in the ESOS and LTIP, subject to shareholders approving those plans. He will receive annual pension contributions equal to 19% of salary and benefits in accordance with the policies applicable to executive directors.

In addition, in September 2012, he was granted the following terms will apply to Mark Armour in connection with his retirement on December 31, 2012:awards:

 

  

his participation inA market value option under ESOS to acquire shares with a face value on the REGP will cease oncedate of grant of 135% of base salary, which vests on the performance share award has been performance-tested in 2013. All3rd anniversary of the performance shares earned will be released at that time and dividend equivalents relating to the earned shares will be paid in cash at the same time. The vesting of the performance shares will begrant subject to the cap applicable to the REGP, with the cap being pro-rated by 3/5th to reflect his years of actual service duringachieving at least 6% p.a. compound growth in adjusted EPS over the performance period offrom January 1, 2010 through2012 to December 31, 2014. He will not be eligible for a grant of matching shares in 2013 and there will be no further entitlement for payments under this plan;

 

  

his shareholding requirementPerformance shares (PSP) with an aggregate face value of 180% of base salary, which are subject to the same performance targets as will apply to any matching award that may be granted to the CEO under the REGP of two times salary will cease in 2013, oncewith performance being assessed in the extentfirst half of any vesting2015. The award is non-pensionable and carries a right to receive dividend equivalents (calculated on the same basis as under the REGP). The leaver rules are consistent with those which apply under the REGP with the exception that “retirement with the consent of the company” is not automatically treated as an approved leaver reason for the performance share award under the REGP has been determined;award.

 

  

no ESOS award will beRestricted shares (RSP) with an aggregate face value of 250% of base salary, which vest 50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015 provided all unvested stock-based awards granted to him by his previous employer lapse. This one-off grant of restricted shares was made to himcompensate Mr Palmer for the forfeiture of awards from his former employer. They are subject to a time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns, or is summarily terminated, before the date of the announcement of the 2014 annual results in 2012;2015.

existing covenants relating to non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality will remain in place for 12 months post-retirement;

The Committee considered the grant of performance shares and restricted shares noted above to have been essential to secure Duncan Palmer’s services. The Committee was satisfied that the awards are appropriate and align his interests with those of shareholders. Both awards fall within paragraph 9.4.2(2)R of the UK Listing Rules and were granted over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares but half of each award will be settled on vesting with Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. The awards cannot be amended to the advantage of Duncan Palmer without shareholder approval and the documentation governing these awards will be available for inspection from the date of the notices of the 2013 Annual General Meetings up to and including the meetings themselves.

all unvested share based awards will be treated in accordance with the rules of the plans, and outstanding ESOS options remain exercisable for up to three and a half years from retirement;In recognition of Mr Palmer and his family having to relocate to the UK in order for him to take up his new position, he will receive a one-off cash relocation allowance of £500,000 in May 2013 (subject to a time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns or is summarily terminated prior to December 31, 2014) and relocation support under the standard Reed Elsevier Policy.

Mark Armour’s retirement terms

Mark Armour’s retirement terms were disclosed in last year’s Report (page 55).

no further payments will be due.

Policy on external appointments

The Committee believes that the experience gained by allowing executive directors to serve as non-executive directors on the boards of other organisations is of benefit to Reed Elsevier. Accordingly, executive directors may, subject to the approval of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, serve as non-executive directors on the boards of up to two non-associated companies (of which only one may be to the board of a major company) and they may retain remuneration arising from such appointments.

Mark Armour is a non-executive director of SABMiller plc and received remuneration of £100,694£106,250 during 2011201259,610100,694 during 2010 reflecting pro-rata payments2011). He is also a non-executive director of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and received remuneration of £12,500 since appointment).commencing his appointment on July 2, 2012.

Duncan Palmer is a non-executive director of Oshkosh Corporation and received fees of £15,487 since his appointment as a director of Reed Elsevier PLC up to the end of 2012.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Policy on non-executive directors’ fees

The policy on non-executive directors’ fees is a matter for the Boards, subject to applicable law, and does not fall within the Committee’s remit.

Reed Elsevier seeks to recruit non-executive directors with the experience to contribute to the Boards of a dual-listed global business and with a balance of personal skills that will make a major contribution to the Boards and their committee structures. With the exception of Marike van Lier Lels who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, non-executive directors, including the Chairman, are appointed to the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV. Non-executive directors’ fees reflect the directors’ membership of the three Boards.

The primary source for comparative market data is the practice of FTSE 50 companies, although reference is also made to AEXNYSE Euronext Amsterdam (AEX) Index and US listed companies.

Non-executive directors, including the Chairman, serve under letters of appointment and are not entitled to notice of, or payments following, retirement from the Boards.

Fee levels

Non-executive directors receive an annual fee in respect of their memberships of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc. The fee paid to Marike van Lier Lels, who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, reflects her time commitment to that company and to other companies within the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. Non-executive directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending meetings. They do not receive any performance-related bonuses, pension provision, share options or other forms of benefit except for the following: the Chairman is in receipt of private medical benefit and non-executive directors and the Chairman are provided with tax filing support to meet any tax filing obligations arising from their directorships with Reed Elsevier in countries other than their home country.

Fees may be reviewed annually, although in practice they have changed on a less frequent basis. DuringThe last fee review was during 2011 fees were reviewed for non-executive directors, Supervisory Board members and the Chairman, taking account of market practice and general governance trends. Prior to that,current fee arrangements took effect on January 1, 2012.

The fees for non-executive directors2013 are unchanged from 2012 and Supervisory Board members had last been reviewed in 2007 and increased with effect from January 1, 2008 although a separate fee of £20,000 was introduced with effect from January 1, 2011 for the senior independent director. In addition, the chairmanship of the Audit and Remuneration Committees attracts a separate fee of £25,000/€30,000 (£15,000/€20,000 until December 31, 2011) and £20,000 (£15,000 until December 31, 2011). The Chairman of Reed Elsevier does not receive committee chairman fees. are set out below.

Annual fee 2013

Chairman

£550,000

Non-executive directors

£65,000/€80,000

Senior Independent Director

£20,000

Chairman of:

— Audit Committee

£25,000/€30,000

— Remuneration Committee

£20,000

The total annual fee payable to Marike van Lier Lels is €65,000 (€48,000 in 2011)(unchanged from 2012). The Chairman of Reed Elsevier does not receive committee chairman fees.

Directors’ emoluments and fees

 

(a)Aggregate emoluments

The emoluments of the directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (including any entitlement to fees or emoluments from either Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV) were as follows:

 

  2011
£
   2010
£
   2012
£
   2011
£
 
  

    £’000    

       £’000       £’000   £’000 

Salaries and fees

   2,590     3,324     2,972     2,590  

Benefits

   56     97     89     56  

Annual performance-related bonuses

   1,634     2,351     2,074     1,634  

Payments for loss of office

        499  

Pension contributions

   42     43     44     42  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,322     6,314     5,179     4,322  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(b)Individual emoluments of executive directors

 

  Salary
£
   Benefits
£
   Bonus
£
      Total    
2011
£
   Total
2010
£
   Salary
£
   Benefits
£
   Bonus
£
   Total
2012
£
   Total
2011

£
 

Erik Engstrom

   1,025,000     28,492     1,021,925     2,075,417     2,028,108     1,050,625     28,396     1,149,909     2,228,930     2,075,417  

Mark Armour

   628,776     22,988     611,799     1,263,563     1,248,742     644,495     23,984     693,799     1,362,278     1,263,563  

Duncan Palmer*

   213,846     32,878     230,205     476,929     n/a  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,653,776     51,480     1,633,724     3,338,980     3,276,850     1,908,966     85,258     2,073,913     4,068,137     3,338,980  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

*The benefits figure for Duncan Palmer includes the balance of his company pension contribution which is paid to him as a cash allowance, as detailed under the Retirement Benefits section on pages 51 and 52 which, for 2012, was £22,810.

Market value options awarded under ESOS and restricted shares awarded in the year of reporting under BIP are set out by executive director on pages 6159 to 62.61. Vesting is subject to performance conditions relating to growth in adjusted EPS and ROIC, as described in the front section of this Report. The maximum number of options that can vest under ESOS and the maximum number of restricted shares that can vest under the BIP is equivalent to the awards granted.

The maximum number of shares which can vest under the September 2012 grants of performance share awards and restricted share awards to Duncan Palmer is equivalent to the awards granted. Erik Engstrom was the highest paid director in 2011.2012.

 

(c)Individual fees of non-executive directors

 

  2011
£**
 2010
£**
   2012
£*
 2011
£*
 

Mark Elliott

   70,000    70,000     85,000    70,000  

Anthony Habgood

   500,000  500,000   550,000**   500,000** 

Adrian Hennah (from April 20, 2011)

   38,475         65,000    38,475  

Lisa Hook

   55,000    55,000     65,000    55,000  

Marike van Lier Lels (from January 13, 2010)

   41,739***   39,744  

Marike van Lier Lels

   52,846***   41,739  

Robert Polet

   55,000    55,000     65,000    55,000  

Sir David Reid

   75,000    55,000     85,000    75,000  

Lord Sharman (until April 20, 2011)

   18,333    63,750         18,333  

Linda Sanford (from December 4, 2012)

   5,416      

Ben van der Veer

   82,609***   71,225     89,431***   82,609  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   936,156    909,719     1,062,693    936,156  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

*Excludes private medical insurance benefit of £1,329 in respect of 2011 (£1,244 in 2010).
**The above figures exclude an imputed notional benefit in respect of tax filing support provided to non-executive directors for tax filings in countries other than their home country resulting from theirthe directorship with Reed Elsevier. The incremental assessable benefit charge per relevant tax return has been agreed by PwC to amount to £300.
**Excludes private medical insurance benefit of £1,389 in respect of 2012 (£1,329 in 2011).
***The fees for Marike van Lier Lels and Ben van der Veer are paid in euro and were €48,000€65,000 and €110,000 respectively for 2012 (€48,000 and €95,000 respectively for 2011.2011). For reporting purposes these were converted into pounds sterling at the average exchange rate for the year of reporting.

Compensation of executive officers

The aggregate compensation paid during 20112012 (and relating to 2011)2012) to those who were executive officers (other than directors) of Reed Elsevier Group plc as at February 15, 201227, 2013 as a group for the year ended December 31, 20112012 was £2,043,070£2,331,660 which included contributions made to the pension plans in respect of such officers of £61,780.£84,882.

BOARD PRACTICES

REED ELSEVIER

The Boards of directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV manage their respective shareholdings in Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc are harmonised. Subject to shareholders of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV re-electing retiring directors at their respective Annual General Meetings in 2012,2013, all the directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc will also be directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and of Reed Elsevier NV. For a complete description of the Board membership positions and executive officer positions within Reed Elsevier, see “— Directors” and “Senior Management” on pages 41 and40 to 42. Details of the Audit Committees of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV are given under “Item 15: Controls and Procedures” and details of the Remuneration Committee are given under “— Remuneration Committee” on page 43.42.

REED ELSEVIER GROUP PLCErik Engstrom

Mark Armour**

Duncan Palmer***

Base salary

£1,050,625£644,495£600,000

Retirement benefit

UK defined benefit planUK defined benefit planUK defined contribution plan and cash supplement

Other benefits

Includes car allowance and private medical benefitIncludes company car or cash allowance and private medical benefitIncludes car allowance and private medical benefit

Annual incentive

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Board currently consists of two executive directors(earned for 2012 and seven non-executive directors. A person may only be appointed or proposed or recommended for appointment to the Board if that person has been nominated for that appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevierpayable in March 2013)

£1,149,909£693,799£230,205

Multi-year incentives granted*

ESOSMarket value options over 198,836 PLC and 139,742 NV ordinary sharesn/aMarket value options over 67,331 PLC and 48,018 NV ordinary sharesBIP68,475 NV ADRs90,987 PLC and 21,028 NV ordinary sharesn/aPSPn/an/a179,551 PLC shares

Shareholding requirement

300% of salary200% of salary200% of salary

*No multi-year incentives vested in 2012. Multi-year incentives from previous years lapsed in early 2012 as already described in last year’s Report.

**Mark Armour served as a director until December 31, 2012.

***Additional awards were made to Duncan Palmer in conjunction with his recruitment. Further details are contained on pages 52 and 53.

Base Salary

Salary reflects the role and the sustained value of the executive in terms of skills, experience and contribution in the context of the relevant market.

Salaries for executive directors are reviewed annually in the context of the competitiveness of total remuneration and Reed Elsevier’s guidelines for wages and salaries agreed for the whole of Reed Elsevier for the forthcoming financial year. Any increases typically take effect on January 1.

The Committee decided to award a salary increase of 2.5% to Erik Engstrom, which increased his base salary with effect from January 1, 2013 to £1,076,891. Duncan Palmer’s service agreement provides that his first salary review following commencement of employment would be on or around January 1, 2014, so his base salary remains unchanged for 2013. In determining the salary recommendation for the CEO, the Committee considered, among other inputs, 2013 salary guidance for Reed Elsevier’s most significant employee locations globally. The increase awarded to the CEO is within the guidelines agreed for those employees in respect of 2013 increases.

In respect of salaries for the broader employee population, Reed Elsevier uses the same factors to determine the levels of increase across all employee populations globally: i.e. relevant pay market, skills, experience and contribution. Reed Elsevier operates across many diverse countries in terms of their remuneration structures and practices. Any increases awarded to different employee groups in different geographies reflect this diversity and range of practices. An average increase of approximately 2.5% will be awarded across the senior management population globally for 2013. This level of increase is in line with increases provided to the wider employee population.

Annual Incentive

The Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) provides focus on the delivery of stretching annual financial targets and the achievement of annual objectives and milestones that create a platform for sustainable future performance.

For 2013, executive directors have a target bonus opportunity of 100% of salary that is weighted as follows across four elements (unchanged from 2012):

Measure

Weighting

— Revenue

30%

— Adjusted Profit After Tax

30%

— Cash Flow Conversion Rate

10%

— Key Performance Objectives (KPOs)

30%

The target bonus opportunity for the financial measures is payable for the achievement of highly stretching financial targets. The four elements are measured separately, such that there could be a payout on one element and not on others.

For 2013, the minimum threshold on the financial elements of the AIP at which a bonus starts to accrue is 94% of target and the maximum bonus is 150% of target (unchanged from 2012).

The KPOs are individual to each executive director. Each executive director is set up to six KPOs to reflect critical business priorities for which he is accountable. The KPO component for the executive directors and other senior executives will contain at least one KPO relating to the achievement of specific sustainability objectives and targets contained within Reed Elsevier’s corporate responsibility agenda.

Against each objective, measurable milestone targets are set for the year. All financial targets and KPOs are approved by the Committee and are subject to formal assessment at the end of each year. The Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of performance against KPOs for the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc to the Committee while the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of KPO performance for the CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Committee then discusses and agrees the final KPO score for each executive director.

AIP Payments for 2012

In assessing the level of bonus payments for 2012, the Committee noted the following performances:

% change over 2011 at constant
exchange rates
Underlying
revenue
Total
adjusted PAT

Reed Elsevier NV. Persons nominated by the joint Nominations Committee will be required

+4%+8%

Reed Elsevier executed well on its strategic and financial priorities in 2012. Positive revenue momentum and focus on operating efficiency combined to lift underlying operating profit growth and earnings. Underlying revenues, which exclude the effects of currency translation and acquisitions and disposals, were up 4%, or 3% excluding the cycling effect of biennial exhibitions, and all five business areas contributed to the underlying growth. Underlying adjusted operating profits were up 6%, with the improvement in profitability driven by a combination of process innovation and portfolio development across all business areas. Underlying costs were up 4%, reflecting volume growth as well as organic investment in new product development and sales & marketing, partly offset by continued improvements in process efficiency. Adjusted operating cash flow was £1,603m (2011: £1,515m), up 6% compared with the prior year and up 7% at constant currencies. The rate of conversion of adjusted operating profits into cash flow was 94% (2011: 93%). Returns on invested capital increased to 11.9%, 0.7 percentage points higher than in 2011, reflecting the improved trading performance and capital efficiency.

Set out below is a summary of the outcome of performance against each financial measure:

Revenue

Just above target

Adjusted Profit After Tax

Just above target

Cash Flow Conversion Rate

Just above target

The progress on personal objectives for each director was then added in the form of the KPO score and, overall, the sum of the scores achieved against the four AIP components for the executive directors, resulted in the following bonuses for 2012:

2012 annual bonus
(to be approved bypaid in March 2013)
% of
2012 base
salary earnings

Erik Engstrom

£1,149,909109.5%

Mark Armour

£693,799107.7%

Duncan Palmer*

£230,205107.7%

*DuncanPalmer’s bonus reflects service during the year of reporting. His service commenced on August 24, 2012.

Multi-Year Incentives

It is intended to continue to provide executive directors with multi-year incentives comprising a combination of a long-term incentive plan (LTIP), a personal investment bonus deferral plan (BIP) and market value options (ESOS). To this end, a new LTIP and ESOS are proposed and will be presented for shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual General Meetings (AGMs).

The purpose of the multi-year incentives is to provide focus on the delivery of the medium to longer-term strategy and holding executives accountable for the execution of that strategy while driving value creation through sustained financial performance, capital discipline and the delivery of returns for shareholders.

In addition, the multi-year incentives are structured so as to encourage personal investment and require a minimum level of ongoing shareholding in Reed Elsevier securities among the senior executive population in order to promote alignment with shareholders and to provide focus on the share price.

Awards under the current and proposed multi-year incentives vest over a period of three years, except for the one-off REGP under which awards vest over three and five years. The vesting of all awards made to executive directors under these plans is subject to meeting a number of stretching performance targets based on internal financial metrics and total shareholder return.

Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP)

The details of how the REGP operates have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports.

Performance measures and targets

Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to Reed Elsevier’s TSR performance compared against three comparator groups (the TSR tranche).

As Reed Elsevier accesses equity capital markets through three exchanges — London, Amsterdam and New York — in three separate currency zones, three distinct comparator groups are used — a Sterling Comparator Group, a Euro Comparator Group and a US Dollar Comparator Group. The TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (based on the

London listing) is measured against the Sterling Comparator Group; the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (based on the Amsterdam listing) is measured against the Euro Comparator Group; and the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRs (based on the New York listing) is measured against the US Dollar Comparator Group. The averaging period applied for TSR measurement purposes is six months prior to the start of the financial year in which the award was made and the final six months of the last financial year of the performance period.

TSR performance of each security is measured separately against each comparator group and the proportion of the TSR tranche that vests is the sum of the payouts achieved against the three comparator groups.

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for ranking between the median and the upper quartile.

TSR comparators groups

The constituents of each comparator group were selected on a specific basis, as described in last year’s Report (page 49).

The comparators which were included in each currency group are set on page 50 of last year’s Report.

Return on invested capital (ROIC)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to the percentage return on invested capital of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (the ROIC tranche) as follows:

3 years: 2010-12

  2 years: 2013-14  Vesting percentage
of ROIC tranche

ROIC in 2012

subject to actual

exceeding 2009

ROIC calculated on

the same basis

  ROIC in 2014   

Below 10.2%

  Below 10.7%  0%

10.2%

  10.7%  60%

11.2% or above

  12.7% or above  100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels. For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

Invested capital = arithmetic average of the opening and closing capital employed for the Reed Elsevier Group plc Board, prior to appointment tocombined businesses for the financial year with all cumulative amortisation and impairment charges for acquired intangible assets and goodwill added back. In addition, any exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges (net of tax) are capitalised for these purposes and changes in exchange rates and movements in pension deficits are excluded.

Return = adjusted operating profit for the Reed Elsevier Group plc Board.combined businesses before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges. In addition, it is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures and further adjusted to exclude net pension financing credit movement, after applying the effective rate of tax used for adjusted earnings calculations and using exchange rates to match those used in the calculation of invested capital.

In order to ensure that the performance score achieved is a fair reflection of underlying business performance, the Committee retains discretion to determine the treatment of major disposals and acquisitions that require board approval. Any significant adjustments made to the final performance score will be disclosed to shareholders.

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to performance against growth in adjusted earnings per share measured at constant currencies (Adjusted EPS) (the EPS tranche) as follows:

3 years: 2010-12

2 years: 2013-14Vesting percentage
of EPS tranche

Average Adjusted EPS

Decisionsgrowth in years 2011 and

2012 (subject to average Adjusted EPS growth over the whole three year period being positive)

Average Adjusted EPS

growth over

the two year period

Below 5% p.a.

Below 7% p.a.0%

5% p.a.

7% p.a.60%

9% p.a. or above

13% p.a. or above100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels. For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

Earnings = adjusted reported earnings measured at constant currencies. Adjustments include amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges, gains/losses on business disposals and tax rate anomalies (deferred tax). The Committee retains discretion to adjust for changes in the net pension financing credit.

Number of shares = weighted average number of shares in issue excluding shares held in treasury.

Performance share awards were granted under the REGP to Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these share awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and other relevant factors. Based on a review of the three performance measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 66.8% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on a TSR ranking of just above median in respect of two of the comparator groups, ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and acquisition integration costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth slightly above the middle of the range specified in the plan.

This would result in 429,710 PLC ordinary shares and 282,187 NV ordinary shares vesting in respect of Erik Engstrom. 50% of these shares will be released to Mr Engstrom following the April Committee meeting and 50% of these shares will be deferred until 2015. In respect of Mr Armour, under the terms of the plan relating to retirement, 100% of the shares vesting will be released to him following the April Committee meeting. In accordance with the preliminary vesting calculations, this will result in 263,601 PLC ordinary shares and 173,105 NV ordinary shares being released to Mr Armour. Thereafter, Mr Armour will have no further entitlement for payment under this plan. Dividend equivalents will be payable in cash on any shares released which, based on the preliminary calculations, would result in payments of £135,251 and €179,329 to Mr Engstrom and £165,937 and €220,016 to Mr Armour.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

No awards under LTIP were made to executive directors in 2012 and no award cycles remain outstanding for directors under this plan.

A long-term incentive award was granted to senior leaders below the Board in 2012. Grants are made on a rolling three year basis in the form of performance shares that vest subject to performance metrics and vesting scales consistent with the REGP. The targets set for each metric are aligned to the five-year performance scale applicable to the executive directors under the REGP.

Subject to receipt of shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual General Meetings, it is intended to commence making annual grants under a new long-term incentive plan to executive directors from 2013 onwards, under which the first awards would vest in H1 2016, which is the year after the vesting of the second and final tranche of the REGP for the CEO, so there will be no overlapping payouts. The LTIP was required by the need to replace the one-off REGP incentive plan for directors with a more regular long-term.

Details of the proposed new LTIP are described in the 2013 notices of Annual General Meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS)

The current ESOS, which was approved by shareholders in 2003, expires on April 8, 2013. A replacement ESOS, for which we are seeking shareholder approval at the Annual General Meetings in April 2013, is described in the notices of Annual General Meetings and it is intended to make grants under this plan to the executive directors in 2013. It is not intended to make any further grants under the existing ESOS, the key features of which were described in last year’s Report on page 52.

During 2012, Erik Engstrom received a grant of 200% of base salary of market value options (two-thirds of the permitted maximum). On joining, Duncan Palmer received a grant of 135% of salary. The vesting of the options is subject to an Adjusted EPS growth hurdle of 6% p.a. compound growth in adjusted earnings per share hurdle, measured over a three year period commencing on January 1 of the year of grant (the same condition also applies to the 2011 ESOS grants which were made to Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour). In view of his retirement at the end of 2012, Mr Armour did not receive an ESOS grant in 2012.

Early in 2012, as disclosed in last year’s Report, the 2009-11 cycle of ESOS lapsed for Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour.

Bonus Investment Plan (BIP)

The BIP is a voluntary plan aimed at encouraging personal investment in, and ongoing holding of, Reed Elsevier shares to promote greater alignment with shareholders and support the retention of key talent.

Under the BIP, participants may invest their own funds to purchase Reed Elsevier securities or allocate securities already owned outright for investment under the plan up to a specified maximum. In return, the participant is granted a matching award which vests over three years subject to performance (i.e. a maximum match of 1 for 1 can be earned on the personal investment). It is a condition of vesting that the underlying personal investment is retained throughout the vesting period. Dividend equivalents accrue on the matching shares during the vesting period and are paid out in cash at the end to the extent that the matching award vests. The table below summarises the key features of the BIP.

Feature

Detail

Frequency of award

Annual grants of matching awards
Ten-year life of the Board ofplan
Implemented in 2010

Eligibility

Approximately 150 senior executives including executive directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc require a simple majority,
Participation is voluntary

Performance period

Three financial years

Performance conditions

Average adjusted EPS growth measured in constant currencies and the quorum required for meetings of the Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc is any two directors.

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Board has established the following committees:

ROIC (see below)
   

Audit — currently comprising four independent non-executive directors

Remuneration — currently comprising three independent non-executive directors and the Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc

Arrangements established at the time of the merger of Reed Elsevier PLC’s and Reed Elsevier NV’s businesses provide that, if any person (together with persons acting in concert with him) acquires shares, or control of the voting rights attaching to shares, carrying more than 50% of the votes ordinarily exercisable at a general meeting of Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NVaward is subject to adjusted EPS growth and has not made a comparable takeover offer for the other party, the other party may by notice suspend or modify the operation of certain provisions50% subject to ROIC

Vesting scale

Performance hurdle and straight-line vesting

Personal investment

Up to 100% of the merger arrangements, such as (i) the righttarget bonus opportunity net of the party in which control has been acquired (the “Acquired Party”) to appoint or remove directors of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc and (ii) the Standstill Obligations (defined below) in relation to the Acquired Party. Such a notice will cease to apply if the person acquiring control makes a comparable offer for all the equity securities of the other within a specified period or if the person (and persons acting in concert with him) ceases to have control of the other.tax

Other provisions

In the event of

On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis for service and subject to performance based on an assessment of one parent company and not the other (where there has been no comparable offer for the other), the parent company which has not suffered the change in control will effectively have the sole right to remove and appoint directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc. Also, a director removed from the Board of a parent company which has suffered a change in control will not have to resign from the Board of the other parent company or Reed Elsevier Group plc.

The Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier Group plc contain certain restrictions on the transfer of shares in Reed Elsevier Group plc. In addition, pursuant to arrangements establishedprogress against targets at the time the change of control occurs, unless the Committee determines that awards should not vest and instead be exchanged for equivalent awards over shares in the acquiring company (i.e. rollover applies)

Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with shares purchased in the market

The following targets and vesting scale apply to awards granted under the BIP in 2012:

Match earned on personal investment

  

Average growth in adjusted EPS (%)
over the 3 year performance period

  ROIC (%) in the third year of
the performance period

0%

  below 4% p.a.  below 11%

50%

  4% p.a.  11%

75%

  6.5% p.a.  11.5%

100%

  9% p.a. or above  12% or above

Awards were granted under the BIP to Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, in much the same way as for the REGP, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and other relevant factors.

Based on a review of the two performance measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 89.5% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and restructuring costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth just below the 70th percentile of the target range specified in the plan.

This would result in the vesting of 62,819 NV ADR matching awards in respect of Mr Engstrom and a corresponding cash dividend equivalent payment of $178,181. In respect of Mr Armour, 58,223 PLC ordinary shares and 38,048 NV ordinary shares would be released, with corresponding dividend equivalent payments of £36,651 and €48,359 respectively.

Shareholding requirement

The Committee believes that one of the aspects that creates closer alignment between senior management and shareholders is to require executives to build up and maintain a significant personal stake in Reed Elsevier. The shareholding requirements applicable to the executive directors are set out in the table below and as described on page 47, were pre-requisites to participate in the REGP. Shareholding requirements also apply to selected senior executives below the Board.

Meeting the relevant shareholding requirement is both a condition of the vesting of awards as well as a pre-requisite to maintain eligibility to receive future awards under the multi-year incentives.

On December 31, 2012, the executive directors’ shareholdings were as follows (valued at the mid-market closing prices of Reed Elsevier securities):

   Shareholding requirement
(in % of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)
 Actual shareholding as at
December 31, 2012 (in %
of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)

Erik Engstrom

  300% 512%

Mark Armour

  200% 442%

Duncan Palmer*

  200% 0%

*Duncan Palmer has until December 31, 2015 to build up to his required level of shareholding and must retain any net shares earned from Reed Elsevier share plans until he meets his requirement.

Retirement benefits

Retirement benefit provisions are set in the context of the total remuneration for each executive director, taking account of age and service and against the background of evolving legislation and practice in Reed Elsevier’s major countries of operation. Base salary is the only pensionable element of remuneration.

Erik Engstrom is provided with UK defined benefit pension arrangements under which he accrues a pension of 1/30th of salary for every year of service (up to a maximum of two thirds of salary). The pension is provided through a combination of:

the main UK Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme for salary restricted to the Scheme Earnings Cap (determined annually on the same basis as the pre-April 2006 Inland Revenue earnings cap) and HMRC Annual Allowance, and

Reed Elsevier’s unapproved pension arrangement for the balance.

Prior to November 1, 2007, Erik Engstrom was not a member of any company pension scheme and Reed Elsevier made annual contributions of 19.5% of his salary to his personal pension plan. From November 1, 2007 contributions to his designated retirement account ceased and he became a member of the UK defined benefit pension arrangement.

The pension arrangements for Erik Engstrom include life assurance cover while in employment, an entitlement to a pension in the event of ill health or disability and a spouse’s and/or dependants’ pension on death.

The increase in the transfer value of the directors’ pensions, after deduction of contributions, is shown in the table below. Transfer values have been calculated in accordance with the guidance note GN11 published by the UK Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries. The transfer values at December 31, 2012 have been calculated using the transfer value basis adopted by the trustees of the Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme.

The transfer value in respect of individual directors represents a liability in respect of directors’ pension entitlement, and is not an amount paid or payable to the director.

Mark Armour retired on December 31, 2012, at which point he became entitled to a pension of £378,785 per annum.

Transfer values of accrued pension benefits

  Age at
December 31,
2012
  Director’s
contributions
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2011
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase in
transfer
value during
the year
(net of
director’s
contributions)
  Accrued
annual
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
(net of
inflation)
  Transfer
value at

December 31,
2012 of
increase
in accrued
pension
during the
year

(net of
inflation

and director’s
contributions)
 

Erik Engstrom

  49   £9,158   £2,099,132   £2,730,651   £622,361   £180,958   £38,584   £31,750   £469,944  

Mark Armour

  58   £1,944   £6,758,053   £7,525,908   £765,911   £384,878 £30,355   £13,362   £259,332  

*The reason for the difference between Mr Armour’s accrued annual pension as at 12.31.12, as stated in the table above, and the annual pension entitlement following retirement is that Mr Armour retired early so there was a reduction made to his accrued annual pension as at 12.31.12.

Duncan Palmer is a member of the UK Reed Elsevier defined contribution pension plan (the Reed Elsevier Pension Plan — REPP). The company contribution is 19% of Mr Palmer’s salary. £50,000 is paid as a contribution to the REPP, being the maximum contribution which can be made under HMRC limits, and the balance is paid to him as a cash allowance, subject to deduction of income tax and national insurance. The pension arrangement for Mr Palmer includes life assurance cover while in employment.

Service contracts

Executive directors are employed under service contracts that provide for a maximum of one year’s notice. The contracts neither specify a pre-determined level of severance payment nor contain specific provisions in respect of a change in control. The Committee believes that as a general rule, notice periods should be 12 months and that the executive directors should, subject to any legal constraints within their base country, be required to mitigate their losses in the event of termination. The Committee will, however, note local market conditions so as to ensure that the terms offered are appropriate to attract and retain top executives operating in global businesses.

The contractual terms of the executive directors (and for approximately 100 other senior executives) include certain covenants as follows:

non-competition restrictions apply which prevent the executive from working in a capacity which competes with any Reed Elsevier business which he/she was involved with during the preceding 12 months; from recruiting Reed Elsevier employees and from soliciting Reed Elsevier customers and suppliers for a period of 12 months after leaving employment;

in the event of the merger, neither Reed Elsevier PLC nor Reed Elsevier NV may acquire or dispose ofexecutive resigning, he/she will immediately lose all rights to any interest inoutstanding awards under the share capital of the other or otherwise takemulti-year incentives including any action to acquire the other without the prior approval of the other (the “Standstill Obligations”). The Panel on Takeoversvested but unexercised options; and Mergers in the United Kingdom (the “Panel”) has stated that

in the event of a changebreach of statutory controlthe covenants, any gains made or payouts received, in the period starting six months prior to and ending 12 months after leaving employment, on the vesting or exercise of either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV,awards from the person or persons acquiring such control willmulti-year incentives may be requiredrepayable.

Each executive director has a service contract with Reed Elsevier Group plc, as summarised in the table below:

Current
contract date

Date
employment
commenced

Expiry date

(subject to make an offernotice
period)

Notice periodSubject to

Erik Engstrom

March 14, 2011August 23, 2004June 14, 202812 monthsEnglish law

Mark Amour

October 7, 1996February 1, 1995Ceased to be a director and retired on December 31, 201212 monthsEnglish law

Duncan Palmer

August 15, 2012August 24, 2012n/a12 monthsEnglish law

Duncan Palmer’s remuneration arrangements

Duncan Palmer’s annual base salary on his recruitment was £600,000 and he has an annual target bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary. He will be eligible to participate in BIP from 2013 onwards up to his target bonus opportunity net of tax and to participate in the ESOS and LTIP, subject to shareholders approving those plans. He will receive annual pension contributions equal to 19% of salary and benefits in accordance with the policies applicable to executive directors.

In addition, in September 2012, he was granted the following awards:

A market value option under ESOS to acquire shares with a face value on the share capitaldate of Reed Elsevier Group plc (but not Elsevier Reed Finance BV) held bygrant of 135% of base salary, which vests on the other,3rd anniversary of grant subject to achieving at least 6% p.a. compound growth in accordanceadjusted EPS over the performance period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014.

Performance shares (PSP) with an aggregate face value of 180% of base salary, which are subject to the same performance targets as will apply to any matching award that may be granted to the CEO under the REGP in 2013, with performance being assessed in the first half of 2015. The award is non-pensionable and carries a right to receive dividend equivalents (calculated on the same basis as under the REGP). The leaver rules are consistent with those which apply under the REGP with the requirementsexception that “retirement with the consent of the City Code on Take-overs and Mergers in the United Kingdom. This requirement wouldcompany” is not apply if the person acquiring statutory control of either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV madeautomatically treated as an offerapproved leaver reason for the other on termsperformance share award.

Restricted shares (RSP) with an aggregate face value of 250% of base salary, which vest 50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015 provided all unvested stock-based awards granted to him by his previous employer lapse. This one-off grant of restricted shares was made to compensate Mr Palmer for the forfeiture of awards from his former employer. They are considered bysubject to a time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns, or is summarily terminated, before the Panel to be appropriate.

REED ELSEVIER PLC

The Reed Elsevier PLC Board currently consists of two executive directors and seven non-executive directors. A person may only be appointed or proposed or recommended for appointment to the Board if that person has been nominated for that appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Persons nominated by the joint Nominations Committee will be required to be approved by the Reed Elsevier PLC Board, prior to the appointment to the Reed Elsevier PLC Board. A copydate of the terms of referenceannouncement of the Nominations2014 annual results in 2015.

The Committee considered the grant of performance shares and restricted shares noted above to have been essential to secure Duncan Palmer’s services. The Committee was satisfied that the awards are appropriate and align his interests with those of shareholders. Both awards fall within paragraph 9.4.2(2)R of the UK Listing Rules and were granted over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares but half of each award will be settled on vesting with Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. The awards cannot be amended to the advantage of Duncan Palmer without shareholder approval and the documentation governing these awards will be available for inspection from the date of the notices of the 2013 Annual General Meetings up to and including the meetings themselves.

In recognition of Mr Palmer and his family having to relocate to the UK in order for him to take up his new position, he will receive a one-off cash relocation allowance of £500,000 in May 2013 (subject to a time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns or is summarily terminated prior to December 31, 2014) and relocation support under the standard Reed Elsevier Policy.

Mark Armour’s retirement terms

Mark Armour’s retirement terms were disclosed in last year’s Report (page 55).

Policy on external appointments

The Committee believes that the experience gained by allowing executive directors to serve as non-executive directors on the boards of other organisations is of benefit to Reed Elsevier. Accordingly, executive directors may, subject to the approval of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, serve as non-executive directors on the boards of up to two non-associated companies (of which only one may be to the board of a major company) and they may retain remuneration arising from such appointments.

Mark Armour is a non-executive director of SABMiller plc and received remuneration of £106,250 during 2012 (£100,694 during 2011). He is also a non-executive director of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and received remuneration of £12,500 since commencing his appointment on July 2, 2012.

Duncan Palmer is a non-executive director of Oshkosh Corporation and received fees of £15,487 since his appointment as a director of Reed Elsevier PLC up to the end of 2012.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Policy on non-executive directors’ fees

The policy on non-executive directors’ fees is a matter for the Boards, subject to applicable law, and does not fall within the Committee’s remit.

Reed Elsevier seeks to recruit non-executive directors with the experience to contribute to the Boards of a dual-listed global business and with a balance of personal skills that will make a major contribution to the Boards and their committee structures. With the exception of Marike van Lier Lels who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, non-executive directors, including the Chairman, are appointed to the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV. Non-executive directors’ fees reflect the directors’ membership of the three Boards.

The primary source for comparative market data is the practice of FTSE 50 companies, although reference is also made to NYSE Euronext Amsterdam (AEX) Index and US listed companies.

Non-executive directors, including the Chairman, serve under letters of appointment and are not entitled to notice of, or payments following, retirement from the Boards.

Fee levels

Non-executive directors receive an annual fee in respect of their memberships of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc. The fee paid to Marike van Lier Lels, who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, reflects her time commitment to that company and to other companies within the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. Non-executive directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending meetings. They do not receive any performance-related bonuses, pension provision, share options or other forms of benefit except for the following: the Chairman is in receipt of private medical benefit and non-executive directors and the Chairman are provided with tax filing support to meet any tax filing obligations arising from their directorships with Reed Elsevier in countries other than their home country.

Fees may be reviewed annually, although in practice they have changed on a less frequent basis. The last fee review was during 2011 and the current fee arrangements took effect on January 1, 2012.

The fees for 2013 are unchanged from 2012 and are set out below.

Annual fee 2013

Chairman

£550,000

Non-executive directors

£65,000/€80,000

Senior Independent Director

£20,000

Chairman of:

— Audit Committee is available on request and can

£25,000/€30,000

— Remuneration Committee

be viewed on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. The joint Nominations Committee currently comprises five non-executive directors.

£20,000

The total annual fee payable to Marike van Lier Lels is €65,000 (unchanged from 2012). The Chairman of Reed Elsevier does not receive committee chairman fees.

Directors’ emoluments and fees

Notwithstanding the provisions outlined above in relation to the appointment to the Board, Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders retain their rights under Reed Elsevier PLC’s Articles of Association to appoint directors to the Reed Elsevier PLC Board by ordinary resolution. Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders may also, by ordinary resolution, remove a director from the Board of Reed Elsevier PLC, and in such circumstances that director will also be required to be removed or resign from the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc (except in circumstances where there has been a change of control of Reed Elsevier PLC and not Reed Elsevier NV).

The Reed Elsevier PLC Board has also established the following committees:
(a)Aggregate emoluments

The emoluments of the directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (including any entitlement to fees or emoluments from either Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV) were as follows:

 

Audit — currently comprising four independent non-executive directors; and
   2012
£
   2011
£
 
   £’000   £’000 

Salaries and fees

   2,972     2,590  

Benefits

   89     56  

Annual performance-related bonuses

   2,074     1,634  

Pension contributions

   44     42  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,179     4,322  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(b)Individual emoluments of executive directors

 

Corporate Governance — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, comprising all non-executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and members of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV.
   Salary
£
   Benefits
£
   Bonus
£
   Total
2012
£
   Total
2011

£
 

Erik Engstrom

   1,050,625     28,396     1,149,909     2,228,930     2,075,417  

Mark Armour

   644,495     23,984     693,799     1,362,278     1,263,563  

Duncan Palmer*

   213,846     32,878     230,205     476,929     n/a  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,908,966     85,258     2,073,913     4,068,137     3,338,980  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Elsevier Group plc has established a Remuneration Committee,
*The benefits figure for Duncan Palmer includes the balance of his company pension contribution which is responsiblepaid to him as a cash allowance, as detailed under the Retirement Benefits section on pages 51 and 52 which, for recommending to the Boards the remuneration for the executive directors2012, was £22,810.

Market value options awarded under ESOS and restricted shares awarded in the year of reporting under BIP are set out by executive director on pages 59 to 61. Vesting is subject to performance conditions relating to growth in adjusted EPS and ROIC, as described in the front section of this Report. The maximum number of options that can vest under ESOS and the maximum number of restricted shares that can vest under the BIP is equivalent to the awards granted. The maximum number of shares which can vest under the September 2012 grants of performance share awards and restricted share awards to Duncan Palmer is equivalent to the awards granted. Erik Engstrom was the highest paid director in 2012.

(c)Individual fees of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Reed Elsevier NV.

Under the Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier PLC, one third of the directors shall retire from office and, if they wish, make themselves available for re-appointment by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Notwithstanding these provisions in the Articles of Association, in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code all directors retire and offer themselves for re-election at each Annual General Meeting.

REED ELSEVIER NV

Reed Elsevier NV has a two-tier board structure currently comprising two executive directors (the “Executive Board”) and eight non-executive directors (the “Supervisory Board” and, together with the Executive Board, the “Combined Board”, all together referred to as the “Boards”). Members of the Boards shall be appointed by the General Shareholders’ Meeting upon a proposal of the Combined Board based on a nomination for appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC. The Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV provide that a resolution of the General Shareholders’ Meeting to appoint a member of the Boards other than in accordance with a proposal of the Combined Board can only be taken by a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast if less than one-half of Reed Elsevier NV’s issued capital is represented at the meeting.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of Reed Elsevier NV shareholders may also, by ordinary resolution, resolve to suspend or dismiss each member from the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV. In addition, each member of the Executive Board can at any time be suspended by the Supervisory Board. In such circumstances that director will also be required to be removed or resign from the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier Group plc (except in circumstances where there has been a change of control of Reed Elsevier NV and not Reed Elsevier PLC).

The Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board has established the following committees:

Audit — currently comprising four members of the Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board; and

 

Corporate Governance — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC, comprising all members of the Supervisory Board and non-executive directors of each company.
   2012
£*
  2011
£*
 

Mark Elliott

   85,000    70,000  

Anthony Habgood

   550,000**   500,000** 

Adrian Hennah (from April 20, 2011)

   65,000    38,475  

Lisa Hook

   65,000    55,000  

Marike van Lier Lels

   52,846***   41,739  

Robert Polet

   65,000    55,000  

Sir David Reid

   85,000    75,000  

Lord Sharman (until April 20, 2011)

       18,333  

Linda Sanford (from December 4, 2012)

   5,416      

Ben van der Veer

   89,431***   82,609  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,062,693    936,156  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

*The above figures exclude an imputed notional benefit in respect of tax filing support provided to non-executive directors for tax filings in countries other than their home country resulting from the directorship with Reed Elsevier. The incremental assessable benefit charge per relevant tax return has been agreed by PwC to amount to £300.

Nominations — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC, currently comprising five members of the Supervisory Board and chaired by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board.

**Excludes private medical insurance benefit of £1,389 in respect of 2012 (£1,329 in 2011).

Reed Elsevier Group plc has established a Remuneration Committee, which is responsible
***The fees for recommending toMarike van Lier Lels and Ben van der Veer are paid in euro and were €65,000 and €110,000 respectively for 2012 (€48,000 and €95,000 respectively for 2011). For reporting purposes these were converted into pounds sterling at the Boards the remunerationaverage exchange rate for the executive directorsyear of Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Reed Elsevier PLC.

Under the Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV, each member of the Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board is appointed for a three-year term, with the possibility of reappointment and shall retire periodically in accordance with a rotation plan drawn up by the Combined Board. Notwithstanding these provisions in the Articles of Association, in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code all members of the Boards retire and seek re-appointment at each Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. To align the arrangements regarding appointment for the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC. Annual re-appointment shall not affect the term of their three-year appointment. A schedule with the anticipated dates of retirement of members of the Supervisory Board is published on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. As a general rule, members of the Supervisory Board serve for two three-year terms. The Nominations Committee may recommend that individual members of the Supervisory Board serve up to one additional three-year term.

ELSEVIER REED FINANCE BV

Elsevier Reed Finance BV has a two-tier board structure comprising a Management Board, currently consisting of three members, and a Supervisory Board, currently consisting of four members. The members of the Management Board and of the Supervisory Board are appointed by the shareholders of Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Articles of Association of Elsevier Reed Finance BV provide that certain material resolutions of the Management Board will require the approval of the Supervisory Board. At a meeting of the Supervisory Board valid resolutions can be taken with a simple majority if the majority of the members are present or represented. Pursuant to the Articles of Association of Elsevier Reed Finance BV, there are specific provisions governing the appointment and dismissal of managing directors and members of the Supervisory Board during periods when a notice of suspension as mentioned in the governing agreement between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV is in force. These provisions intend to neutralise the influence of a party which has acquired control over either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV without having also acquired control in the other.

EMPLOYEES

Employee numbers are disclosed in note 6 to the combined financial statements.

The Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc is fully committed to the concept of employee involvement and participation, and encourages each of its businesses to formulate its own tailor-made approach with the co-operation of employees. Reed Elsevier is an equal opportunity employer, and recruits and promotes employees on the basis of suitability for the job. Appropriate training and development opportunities are available to all employees. A code of ethics and business conduct applicable to employees within Reed Elsevier has been adopted throughout its businesses.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

Share based awards in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV

Details of vested options,(in italics)reporting.

Compensation of executive officersand unvested options and restricted shares held by executive directors in Reed Elsevier PLC (“PLC”) and Reed Elsevier NV (“NV”) as at December 31, 2011 are shown in the tables below. The vesting of outstanding unvested awards is subject to performance conditions in accordance with the provisions of the respective plan rules. For disclosure purposes, any PLC and NV ADRs awarded under the BIP have been converted into ordinary share equivalents. As at February 15, 2012 there have been no changes in the options or restricted shares held by executive directors in office at December 31, 2011 other than those relating to the 2009-11 cycles of ESOS and LTIP as sign-posted in the tables. The market price at the date of award of grants made under the multi-year incentives are based on the middle market price of the respective security.

The aggregate compensation paid during 2012 (and relating to 2012) to those who were executive officers (other than directors) of Reed Elsevier Group plc as at February 27, 2013 as a group for the year ended December 31, 2012 was £2,331,660 which included contributions made to the pension plans in respect of such officers of £84,882.

BOARD PRACTICES

REED ELSEVIER

The Boards of directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV manage their respective shareholdings in Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc are harmonised. Subject to shareholders of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV re-electing retiring directors at their respective Annual General Meetings in 2013, all the directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc will also be directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and of Reed Elsevier NV. For a complete description of the Board membership positions and executive officer positions within Reed Elsevier, see “— Directors” and “Senior Management” on pages 40 to 42. Details of the Audit Committees of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV are given under “Item 15: Controls and Procedures” and details of the Remuneration Committee are given under “— Remuneration Committee” on page 42.

Erik Engstrom

Mark Armour**

Options

 Year of
grant
  

Option
over:

 No. of
options
held on
Jan 1,
2011
  No. of
options
granted
during
2011
  Option
price
  No. of
options
exercised
during
2011
 Market
price per
share at
exercise
 Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
 No. of
options
held on
Dec 31,
2011
  Unvested
options
vesting on:
  Options
exercisable
until:
 

ESOS

  2004   PLC ord  63,460    £4.780       63,460     23 Aug 2014  
  NV ord  43,866    10.30       43,866     23 Aug 2014  
  2005   PLC ord  154,517    £5.335       154,517     17 Feb 2015  
  NV ord  105,412    11.31       105,412     17 Feb 2015  
  2006   PLC ord  178,895    £5.305       178,895     13 Mar 2016  
  NV ord  120,198    11.47       120,198     13 Mar 2016  
  2008   PLC ord  143,000    £6.275            Lapsed  
  NV ord  94,000    12.21            Lapsed  
  2009   PLC ord  146,923    £5.420       146,923     Lapsed
  NV ord  95,399    9.415       95,399     Lapsed
  2011   PLC ord      139,146   £5.390       139,146    5 May 2014    5 May 2021  
  NV ord      92,953   8.969       92,953    5 May 2014    5 May 2021  

LTIP

  2004   PLC ord  325,163    £4.78       325,163     23 Aug 2014  
  NV ord  224,766    10.30       224,766     23 Aug 2014  
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total PLC ords

    1,011,958    139,146        1,008,104    

Total NV ords

    683,641    92,953        682,594    
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Duncan Palmer***

*Lapsed prior to the date of this report

Base salary

£1,050,625£644,495£600,000

Retirement benefit

UK defined benefit planUK defined benefit planUK defined contribution plan and cash supplement

Other benefits

Includes car allowance and private medical benefitIncludes company car or cash allowance and private medical benefitIncludes car allowance and private medical benefit

Annual incentive

(earned for 2012 and payable in March 2013)

£1,149,909£693,799£230,205

Multi-year incentives granted*

ESOSMarket value options over 198,836 PLC and 139,742 NV ordinary sharesn/aMarket value options over 67,331 PLC and 48,018 NV ordinary shares
BIP68,475 NV ADRs90,987 PLC and 21,028 NV ordinary sharesn/a
PSPn/an/a179,551 PLC shares

Shareholding requirement

300% of salary200% of salary200% of salary

 

Shares

 Year of
grant
  

Type of
security

 No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Jan 1,

2011
  No. of
shares
awarded
during
2011
  Market
price per
share at
award
  No. of
shares
vested
during
2011
 Market
price per
share at
vesting
 Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
 No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Dec 31,
2011
    Date of
vesting
 

BIP

  2010   NV ord  140,378    8.310       140,378     Q1 2013  
  2011   NV ord   122,352   8.969       122,352     Q1 2014  

LTIP

  2008   PLC ord  68,500    £6.275            Lapsed  
  NV ord  45,000    12.21            Lapsed  
  2009   PLC ord  103,902    £5.420       103,902     Lapsed
  NV ord  67,465    9.415       67,465     Lapsed

REGP

  2010   PLC ord  643,086    £4.665       643,086     50% H1 2013  
            50% H1 2015  
  NV ord  422,310    8.310       422,310     50% H1 2013  
            50% H1 2015  
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total PLC ords

    815,488         746,988    

Total NV ords

    675,153    122,352        752,505    
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

*Lapsed prior to the date of this report

Mark Armour

Options

  

Year of

grant

  Option
over:
  No. of
options
held on
Jan 1,
2011
   No. of
options
granted
during
2011
   Option
price
   No. of
options
exercised
during
2011
  Market
price per
share at
exercise
  Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
  No. of
options
held on
Dec 31,
2011
   Unvested
options
vesting on:
   Options
exercisable
until:
 

ESOS

  2001  PLC ord   62,974      £6.590                  Expired* 
    NV ord   44,882      14.75                  Expired* 
  2002  PLC ord   74,000      £6.000           74,000       22 Feb 2012  
    NV ord   51,926      13.94           51,926       22 Feb 2012  
  

2005

  PLC ord   150,422      £5.335           150,422       17 Feb 2015  
    NV ord   102,618      11.31           102,618       17 Feb 2015  
  

2006

  PLC ord   158,836      £5.305           158,836       13 Mar 2016  
    NV ord   106,720      11.47           106,720       13 Mar 2016  
  2008  PLC ord   144,000      £6.275                  Lapsed  
    NV ord   94,000      12.21                  Lapsed  
  2009  PLC ord   147,692      £5.420           147,692       Lapsed** 
    NV ord   95,899      9.415           95,899       Lapsed** 
  2011  PLC ord        85,358    £5.390           85,358     5 May 2014     5 May 2021  
    NV ord        57,021    8.969           57,021     5 May 2014     5 May 2021  

LTIP

  2004  PLC ord   290,481      £4.872           290,481       19 Feb 2014  
    NV ord   199,467      10.57           199,467       19 Feb 2014  

SAYE

  2010  PLC ord   2,173      £4.176           2,173     1 Aug 2013     1 Feb 2014  
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

Total PLC ords

       1,030,578     85,358             908,962      

Total NV ords

       695,512     57,021             613,651      
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

*Expired unexercised on 23 February 2011

**Lapsed prior to the date of this report
*No multi-year incentives vested in 2012. Multi-year incentives from previous years lapsed in early 2012 as already described in last year’s Report.

 

Shares

  Year of
grant
   Type of
security
  No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Jan 1,
2011
   No. of
shares
awarded
during
2011
   Market
price per
share at
award
   No. of
shares
vested
during
2011
  Market
price per
share at
vesting
  Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
  No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Dec 31,
2011
   Date of
vesting
 

BIP

   2010    PLC ord   65,054      £4.665           65,054     Q1 2013  
    NV ord   42,512      8.310           42,512     Q1 2013  
   2011    PLC ord        56,876    £5.390           56,876     Q1 2014  
    NV ord        37,687    8.969           37,687     Q1 2014  

LTIP

   2008    PLC ord   67,000      £6.275                Lapsed  
    NV ord   44,000      12.21                Lapsed  
   2009    PLC ord   76,397      £5.420           76,397     Lapsed** 
    NV ord   49,605      9.415           49,605     Lapsed** 

REGP

   2010    PLC ord   394,495      £4.665           394,495     H1 2013  
    NV ord   259,062      8.310           259,062     H1 2013  
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

   

Total PLC ords

       602,946     56,876             592,822    

Total NV ords

       395,179     37,687             388,866    
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

   
**Mark Armour served as a director until December 31, 2012.

 

***Additional awards were made to Duncan Palmer in conjunction with his recruitment. Further details are contained on pages 52 and 53.

Base Salary

Salary reflects the role and the sustained value of the executive in terms of skills, experience and contribution in the context of the relevant market.

Salaries for executive directors are reviewed annually in the context of the competitiveness of total remuneration and Reed Elsevier’s guidelines for wages and salaries agreed for the whole of Reed Elsevier for the forthcoming financial year. Any increases typically take effect on January 1.

The Committee decided to award a salary increase of 2.5% to Erik Engstrom, which increased his base salary with effect from January 1, 2013 to £1,076,891. Duncan Palmer’s service agreement provides that his first salary review following commencement of employment would be on or around January 1, 2014, so his base salary remains unchanged for 2013. In determining the salary recommendation for the CEO, the Committee considered, among other inputs, 2013 salary guidance for Reed Elsevier’s most significant employee locations globally. The increase awarded to the CEO is within the guidelines agreed for those employees in respect of 2013 increases.

In respect of salaries for the broader employee population, Reed Elsevier uses the same factors to determine the levels of increase across all employee populations globally: i.e. relevant pay market, skills, experience and contribution. Reed Elsevier operates across many diverse countries in terms of their remuneration structures and practices. Any increases awarded to different employee groups in different geographies reflect this diversity and range of practices. An average increase of approximately 2.5% will be awarded across the senior management population globally for 2013. This level of increase is in line with increases provided to the wider employee population.

Annual Incentive

The Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) provides focus on the delivery of stretching annual financial targets and the achievement of annual objectives and milestones that create a platform for sustainable future performance.

For 2013, executive directors have a target bonus opportunity of 100% of salary that is weighted as follows across four elements (unchanged from 2012):

Lapsed prior to the date of this report

The number of shares and options that vest in respect of all outstanding (unvested) awards under the multi-year incentives depend on the extent to which performance conditions are met.Measure

Weighting

In respect of the REGP, the maximum number of shares that can vest is 150% of the number of shares shown in the tables above. In respect of ESOS and BIP, the number of awards shown in the table is the maximum capable of vesting. ESOS awards vest on the third anniversary and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. For LTIP, the number of shares shown in the share tables reflects the target award.— Revenue

30%

Options under the SAYE Scheme, in which all eligible UK employees are invited to participate, are granted— Adjusted Profit After Tax

30%

— Cash Flow Conversion Rate

10%

— Key Performance Objectives (KPOs)

30%

The target bonus opportunity for the financial measures is payable for the achievement of highly stretching financial targets. The four elements are measured separately, such that there could be a payout on one element and not on others.

For 2013, the minimum threshold on the financial elements of the AIP at which a bonus starts to accrue is 94% of target and the maximum bonus is 150% of target (unchanged from 2012).

The KPOs are individual to each executive director. Each executive director is set up to six KPOs to reflect critical business priorities for which he is accountable. The KPO component for the executive directors and other senior executives will contain at least one KPO relating to the achievement of specific sustainability objectives and targets contained within Reed Elsevier’s corporate responsibility agenda.

Against each objective, measurable milestone targets are set for the year. All financial targets and KPOs are approved by the Committee and are subject to formal assessment at the end of each year. The Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of performance against KPOs for the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc to the Committee while the CEO of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his assessment of KPO performance for the CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Committee then discusses and agrees the final KPO score for each executive director.

AIP Payments for 2012

In assessing the level of bonus payments for 2012, the Committee noted the following performances:

% change over 2011 at a maximum discount of 20% to the market price at time of grant. They are normally exercisable after the expiry of three or five years from the date of grant. No performance targets are attached to these option grants as the SAYE Scheme is an all-employee scheme.

constant
exchange rates
Underlying
revenue
Total
adjusted PAT

The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share at the date

+4%+8%

Reed Elsevier executed well on its strategic and financial priorities in 2012. Positive revenue momentum and focus on operating efficiency combined to lift underlying operating profit growth and earnings. Underlying revenues, which exclude the effects of currency translation and acquisitions and disposals, were up 4%, or 3% excluding the cycling effect of biennial exhibitions, and all five business areas contributed to the underlying growth. Underlying adjusted operating profits were up 6%, with the improvement in profitability driven by a combination of process innovation and portfolio development across all business areas. Underlying costs were up 4%, reflecting volume growth as well as organic investment in new product development and sales & marketing, partly offset by continued improvements in process efficiency. Adjusted operating cash flow was £1,603m (2011: £1,515m), up 6% compared with the prior year and up 7% at constant currencies. The rate of conversion of adjusted operating profits into cash flow was 94% (2011: 93%). Returns on invested capital increased to 11.9%, 0.7 percentage points higher than in 2011, reflecting the improved trading performance and capital efficiency.

Set out below is a summary of the outcome of performance against each financial measure:

Revenue

Just above target

Adjusted Profit After Tax

Just above target

Cash Flow Conversion Rate

Just above target

The progress on personal objectives for each director was then added in the form of the KPO score and, overall, the sum of the scores achieved against the four AIP components for the executive directors, resulted in the following bonuses for 2012:

2012 annual bonus
(to be paid in March 2013)
% of award of grants in 2011 under the BIP was £5.39. The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share at the date of award of grants in 2011 under the BIP was €8.969.
2012 base
salary earnings

Erik Engstrom

£1,149,909109.5%

The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shareMark Armour

£693,799107.7%

Duncan Palmer*

£230,205107.7%

*DuncanPalmer’s bonus reflects service during the year was in the range of £4.613 to £5.905 and at December 31, 2011 was £5.19. The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share during the year was in the range of €7.588 to €10.27 and at December 31, 2011 was €9.007.

REED ELSEVIER

As of December 31, 2011 Reed Elsevier operated and/or had awards outstanding under a number of equity-basedreporting. His service commenced on August 24, 2012.

Multi-Year Incentives

It is intended to continue to provide executive directors with multi-year incentives comprising a combination of a long-term incentive plan (LTIP), a personal investment bonus deferral plan (BIP) and market value options (ESOS). To this end, a new LTIP and ESOS are proposed and will be presented for shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual General Meetings (AGMs).

The purpose of the multi-year incentives is to provide focus on the delivery of the medium to longer-term strategy and holding executives accountable for the execution of that strategy while driving value creation through sustained financial performance, capital discipline and the delivery of returns for shareholders.

In addition, the multi-year incentives are structured so as to encourage personal investment and require a minimum level of ongoing shareholding in Reed Elsevier securities among the senior executive population in order to promote alignment with shareholders and to provide focus on the share price.

Awards under the current and proposed multi-year incentives vest over a period of three years, except for the one-off REGP under which awards vest over three and five years. The vesting of all awards made to executive directors under these plans is subject to meeting a number of stretching performance targets based on internal financial metrics and total shareholder return.

Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP)

The details of how the REGP operates have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports.

Performance measures and targets

Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to Reed Elsevier’s TSR performance compared against three comparator groups (the TSR tranche).

As Reed Elsevier accesses equity capital markets through three exchanges — London, Amsterdam and New York — in three separate currency zones, three distinct comparator groups are used — a Sterling Comparator Group, a Euro Comparator Group and a US Dollar Comparator Group. The TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (based on the

London listing) is measured against the Sterling Comparator Group; the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (based on the Amsterdam listing) is measured against the Euro Comparator Group; and the TSR performance of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRs (based on the New York listing) is measured against the US Dollar Comparator Group. The averaging period applied for TSR measurement purposes is six months prior to the start of the financial year in which the award was made and the final six months of the last financial year of the performance period.

TSR performance of each security is measured separately against each comparator group and the proportion of the TSR tranche that vests is the sum of the payouts achieved against the three comparator groups.

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for ranking between the median and the upper quartile.

TSR comparators groups

The constituents of each comparator group were selected on a specific basis, as described in last year’s Report (page 49).

The comparators which were included in each currency group are set on page 50 of last year’s Report.

Return on invested capital (ROIC)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to the percentage return on invested capital of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (the ROIC tranche) as follows:

 

3 years: 2010-12

  2 years: 2013-14  Vesting percentage
of ROIC tranche

ROIC in 2012

subject to actual

exceeding 2009

ROIC calculated on

the same basis

  ROIC in 2014   

Below 10.2%

  Below 10.7%  0%

10.2%

  10.7%  60%

11.2% or above

  12.7% or above  100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels. For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

Invested capital = arithmetic average of the opening and closing capital employed for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses for the financial year with all cumulative amortisation and impairment charges for acquired intangible assets and goodwill added back. In addition, any exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges (net of tax) are capitalised for these purposes and changes in exchange rates and movements in pension deficits are excluded.

Return = adjusted operating profit for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges. In addition, it is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures and further adjusted to exclude net pension financing credit movement, after applying the effective rate of tax used for adjusted earnings calculations and using exchange rates to match those used in the calculation of invested capital.

In order to ensure that the performance score achieved is a fair reflection of underlying business performance, the Committee retains discretion to determine the treatment of major disposals and acquisitions that require board approval. Any significant adjustments made to the final performance score will be disclosed to shareholders.

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS)

The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to performance against growth in adjusted earnings per share measured at constant currencies (Adjusted EPS) (the EPS tranche) as follows:

(i)All-Employee Equity-Based Plans

Reed Elsevier’s all-employee equity-based plans comprise:3 years: 2010-12

(a)Reed Elsevier Group plc SAYE Share Option Scheme (the “SAYE Scheme”)2 years: 2013-14Vesting percentage
of EPS tranche

OptionsAverage Adjusted EPS

growth in years 2011 and

2012 (subject to average Adjusted EPS growth over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares have been granted under the SAYE Scheme. Shares may bewhole three year period being positive)

Average Adjusted EPS

growth over

the two year period

Below 5% p.a.

Below 7% p.a.0%

5% p.a.

7% p.a.60%

9% p.a. or above

13% p.a. or above100%

Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the minimum and maximum levels. For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:

Earnings = adjusted reported earnings measured at constant currencies. Adjustments include amortisation and impairment of acquired at not less than the higher of (i) 80% of the closing middle market priceintangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition integration charges, gains/losses on business disposals and tax rate anomalies (deferred tax). The Committee retains discretion to adjust for the relevant share on The London Stock Exchange three days before invitations to apply for options are issued, and (ii) if new shares are to be subscribed, their nominal value.

All UK employees of Reed Elsevier Group plc and participating companies under its control in employment at the date of invitation are entitled to participatechanges in the SAYE Scheme. In addition, the directorsnet pension financing credit.

Number of Reed Elsevier Group plc may permit other employees of Reed Elsevier Group plc and participating companies under its control to participate.

Invitations to apply for options may normally only be issued within 42 days after the announcement of the combined results of Reed Elsevier for any period. No options may be granted more than 10 years after the approval of the scheme.

On joining the SAYE Scheme, a save as you earn contract (a “Savings Contract”) must be entered into with an appropriate savings body, under which savings of between £10 and £250 per month may be made to such savings body for a period of three or five years. A bonus is payable under the Savings Contract at the end of the savings period. The amount of the monthly contributions may be reduced if applications exceed the number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares available for the grant of options on that occasion.

The number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares over which an option may be granted is limited to that= weighted average number of shares which may be acquiredin issue excluding shares held in treasury.

Performance share awards were granted under the REGP to Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these share awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and other relevant factors. Based on a review of the three performance measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 66.8% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on a TSR ranking of just above median in respect of two of the comparator groups, ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and acquisition integration costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth slightly above the middle of the range specified in the plan.

This would result in 429,710 PLC ordinary shares and 282,187 NV ordinary shares vesting in respect of Erik Engstrom. 50% of these shares will be released to Mr Engstrom following the April Committee meeting and 50% of these shares will be deferred until 2015. In respect of Mr Armour, under the terms of the plan relating to retirement, 100% of the shares vesting will be released to him following the April Committee meeting. In accordance with the preliminary vesting calculations, this will result in 263,601 PLC ordinary shares and 173,105 NV ordinary shares being released to Mr Armour. Thereafter, Mr Armour will have no further entitlement for payment under this plan. Dividend equivalents will be payable in cash on any shares released which, based on the preliminary calculations, would result in payments of £135,251 and €179,329 to Mr Engstrom and £165,937 and €220,016 to Mr Armour.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

No awards under LTIP were made to executive directors in 2012 and no award cycles remain outstanding for directors under this plan.

A long-term incentive award was granted to senior leaders below the Board in 2012. Grants are made on a rolling three year basis in the form of performance shares that vest subject to performance metrics and vesting scales consistent with the REGP. The targets set for each metric are aligned to the five-year performance scale applicable to the executive directors under the REGP.

Subject to receipt of shareholder approval at the 2013 Annual General Meetings, it is intended to commence making annual grants under a new long-term incentive plan to executive directors from 2013 onwards, under which the first awards would vest in H1 2016, which is the year after the vesting of the second and final tranche of the REGP for the CEO, so there will be no overlapping payouts. The LTIP was required by the need to replace the one-off REGP incentive plan for directors with a more regular long-term.

Details of the proposed new LTIP are described in the 2013 notices of Annual General Meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS)

The current ESOS, which was approved by shareholders in 2003, expires on April 8, 2013. A replacement ESOS, for which we are seeking shareholder approval at the Annual General Meetings in April 2013, is described in the notices of Annual General Meetings and it is intended to make grants under this plan to the executive directors in 2013. It is not intended to make any further grants under the existing ESOS, the key features of which were described in last year’s Report on page 52.

During 2012, Erik Engstrom received a grant of 200% of base salary of market value options (two-thirds of the permitted maximum). On joining, Duncan Palmer received a grant of 135% of salary. The vesting of the options is subject to an Adjusted EPS growth hurdle of 6% p.a. compound growth in adjusted earnings per share hurdle, measured over a three year period commencing on January 1 of the year of grant (the same condition also applies to the 2011 ESOS grants which were made to Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour). In view of his retirement at the end of 2012, Mr Armour did not receive an ESOS grant in 2012.

Early in 2012, as disclosed in last year’s Report, the 2009-11 cycle of ESOS lapsed for Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour.

Bonus Investment Plan (BIP)

The BIP is a voluntary plan aimed at encouraging personal investment in, and ongoing holding of, Reed Elsevier shares to promote greater alignment with shareholders and support the retention of key talent.

Under the BIP, participants may invest their own funds to purchase Reed Elsevier securities or allocate securities already owned outright for investment under the plan up to a specified maximum. In return, the participant is granted a matching award which vests over three years subject to performance (i.e. a maximum match of 1 for 1 can be earned on the personal investment). It is a condition of vesting that the underlying personal investment is retained throughout the vesting period. Dividend equivalents accrue on the matching shares during the vesting period and are paid out in cash at the end to the extent that the matching award vests. The table below summarises the key features of the BIP.

Feature

Detail

Frequency of award

Annual grants of matching awards
Ten-year life of the plan
Implemented in 2010

Eligibility

Approximately 150 senior executives including executive directors
Participation is voluntary

Performance period

Three financial years

Performance conditions

Average adjusted EPS growth measured in constant currencies and ROIC (see below)
50% of the award is subject to adjusted EPS growth and 50% subject to ROIC

Vesting scale

Performance hurdle and straight-line vesting

Personal investment

Up to 100% of the target bonus opportunity net of tax

Other provisions

On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis for service and subject to performance based on an assessment of progress against targets at the exercise price outtime the change of control occurs, unless the repayment proceeds (including any bonus) of the Savings Contract.

Options under the SAYE Scheme may normally only be exercised for a period of six months after the bonus date under the relevant Savings Contract. However, options may be exercised earlier than the normal exercise date in certain specified circumstances, including death, reaching age 60, or on ceasing employment on account of injury, disability, redundancy, reaching contractual retirement age, or the sale of the business or subsidiary for which the participant works, or provided the option has been held for at least three years, on ceasing employment for any other reason. Exercise is allowed in the event of an amalgamation, reconstruction or take-over of the company whose shares are under option; alternatively, such options may, with the agreement of an acquiring company or a company associated with it,Committee determines that awards should not vest and instead be exchanged for optionsequivalent awards over shares in the acquiring company or that associated company. Options may also be exercised in the event of the voluntary winding-up of the company whose shares are under option. In the event that options are exercised before the bonus date, the participant may acquire only the number of shares that can be purchased with the accumulated savings up to the date of exercise, plus interest (if any).

In the event of any capitalisation or rights issue by Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV, or of any consolidation, subdivision or reduction of their share capital, the number of shares subject to any relevant option and/or the exercise price may be adjusted with the approval of the UK HMRC, subject to the independent auditors of Reed Elsevier Group plc confirming in writing that such adjustment is, in their opinion, fair and reasonable.

(b)Convertible debenture stock arrangements(i.e. rollover applies)

This facility consists of an annual issue by Reed Elsevier NV of a convertible debenture loan (the “Netherlands Convertible Debenture Stock Scheme”) that is open for subscription by Dutch staff employed by Reed Elsevier companies in the Netherlands or temporarily seconded to affiliates abroad. The interest rate of the scheme is determined on the basis of the average interest for 10-year loans at the end of the year preceding the year in which the loan would be issued and be open for subscription. With effect from February 19, 2004 for new issues, interest is determined quarterly on the basis of market rates

on internet savings accounts in the Netherlands. Employees can annually subscribe for one or more debentures of €200 each, up to a maximum amount equal to 20% of the equivalent of their fixed annual salary components. Interest is payable in arrears in the month of January following the subscription year. The loans have a term of 10 years. During the 10-year term of the loan employees can decide to convert their claim on the Company into shares at an exercise price equal to the price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share on Euronext Amsterdam at the end of the month in which the employee has subscribed for the loan (the “exercise price”). Each debenture of €200 can be converted into 50 ordinary shares in Reed Elsevier NV against payment of 50 times the exercise price, less €200.

(ii)Executive Equity-Based Plans

Reed Elsevier’s executive equity-based plans comprise:

(a)Reed Elsevier Group plc Growth Plan (“REGP”)
Claw-back applies

See pages 48 to 52 for a description of this plan.

(b)Executive share option schemes (“ESOS”)

The plans in this category comprise the Reed Elsevier Group plc Share Option Scheme 2003 (“ESOS 2003”) (see page 52 for a description of this plan), the Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive U.K. Share Option Scheme 1993 and the Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive Overseas Share Option Scheme 1993 (together “ESOS 1993”). ESOS 1993 has expired and all outstanding awards under these plans have vested and will lapse, to the extent they remain unexercised, on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

(c)Bonus investment plans (“BIP”)

The plans in this category comprise the Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan 2010 (“BIP 2010”) (see pages 52 and 53 for a description of this plan) and the Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan 2003 (“BIP 2003”).

No awards were made in 2011

Awards under the BIP 2003 and no awards will be made under this plan in 2012. At the date of this report, awards held under the 2009-11 cycle of BIP 2003 had lapsed as the performance hurdle of average compound growth in adjusted EPS at constant currencies of 8% p.a. over the three-year period ending December 31, 2011 had not been met. There are no further awards outstanding under BIP 2003.

(d)Reed Elsevier Group plc Retention Share Plan (“RSP”)

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Retention Share Plan is a share plan operated under the discretion of the Reed Elsevier Remuneration Committee which approves all grants. It facilitates the grant of restricted share awards over Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares, subject to such conditions as specified from time to time by the Reed Elsevier Remuneration Committee. Participation in the plan is limited to employees of Reed Elsevier and participating companies under its control, excluding executive directors.

The plan is used to facilitate the grant of one-off awards of restricted shares, where appropriate, to senior new hires, for example, to buy out share-based awards from previous employment.

In addition, since 2006, employees eligible to participate in the ESOS 2003 (see (b) above), other than executive directors, have been able to choose prior to the date of grant whether to receive all or part of their grant in the form of restricted shares based on a pre-determined conversion ratio of one share for every five options that would otherwise be granted to them under ESOS 2003. The RSP is the vehicle used to deliver the award of restricted shares. The restricted shares vest after the expiry of three years from the date of grant, subject to the participant remaining employed by Reed Elsevier or a participating company under its control. The restricted shares awarded are satisfied by market purchase shares.

On termination of employment, unvested awards made under the plan lapse (except for certain categories of approved leavers).

(e)Other multi-year incentives

The plans in this category comprise Reed Elsevier Group plc Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 (“LTIP 2010”) and the Reed Elsevier Group plc Long Term Incentive Share Option Scheme 2003 (“LTIS 2003”) (see pages 53 and 54 for a description of this plan).

The LTIP 2010 was implemented in 2010. The plan applies to senior executives (including executive officers) other than executive directors. Awards are in the form of restricted shares which vest subject to performance over three financial years. Awards are satisfied with shares purchased in the market. market

The following targets and vesting scale apply to awards granted under the BIP in 2012:

Match earned on personal investment

  

Average growth in adjusted EPS (%)
over the 3 year performance period

  ROIC (%) in the third year of
the performance period

0%

  below 4% p.a.  below 11%

50%

  4% p.a.  11%

75%

  6.5% p.a.  11.5%

100%

  9% p.a. or above  12% or above

Awards were granted under the BIP to Mr Engstrom and Mr Armour in May 2010. At its meeting on April 25, 2013, in much the same way as for the REGP, the Committee will assess the extent to which the performance conditions have been met for these awards, which includes an overall assessment of underlying business performance and other relevant factors.

Based on a review of the two performance measures used in the plan, preliminary calculations indicate that 89.5% of the awards are expected to vest. This is based on ROIC achievement slightly below the 11.2% maximum after taking into account adjustments for such items as foreign exchange rates, pension deficits and restructuring costs as provided in the plan, and EPS growth just below the 70th percentile of the target range specified in the plan.

This would result in the vesting of 62,819 NV ADR matching awards in respect of Mr Engstrom and a corresponding cash dividend equivalent payment of $178,181. In respect of Mr Armour, 58,223 PLC ordinary shares and 38,048 NV ordinary shares would be released, with corresponding dividend equivalent payments of £36,651 and €48,359 respectively.

Shareholding requirement

The Committee believes that one of the aspects that creates closer alignment between senior management and shareholders is to require executives to build up and maintain a significant personal stake in Reed Elsevier. The shareholding requirements applicable to the executive directors are set out in the table below and as described on page 47, were pre-requisites to participate in the REGP. Shareholding requirements also apply to selected senior executives below the Board.

Meeting the relevant shareholding requirement is both a condition of the vesting of awards as well as a pre-requisite to maintain eligibility to receive future awards under the multi-year incentives.

On December 31, 2012, the executive directors’ shareholdings were as follows (valued at the mid-market closing prices of Reed Elsevier securities):

   Shareholding requirement
(in % of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)
 Actual shareholding as at
December 31, 2012 (in %
of December 31, 2012
annualised base salary)

Erik Engstrom

  300% 512%

Mark Armour

  200% 442%

Duncan Palmer*

  200% 0%

*Duncan Palmer has until December 31, 2015 to build up to his required level of shareholding and must retain any net shares earned from Reed Elsevier share plans until he meets his requirement.

Retirement benefits

Retirement benefit provisions are set in the context of the total remuneration for each executive director, taking account of age and service and against the background of evolving legislation and practice in Reed Elsevier’s major countries of operation. Base salary is the only pensionable element of remuneration.

Erik Engstrom is provided with UK defined benefit pension arrangements under which he accrues a pension of 1/30th of salary for every year of service (up to a maximum of two thirds of salary). The pension is provided through a combination of:

the main UK Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme for salary restricted to the Scheme Earnings Cap (determined annually on the same basis as the pre-April 2006 Inland Revenue earnings cap) and HMRC Annual Allowance, and

Reed Elsevier’s unapproved pension arrangement for the balance.

Prior to November 1, 2007, Erik Engstrom was not a member of any company pension scheme and Reed Elsevier made annual contributions of 19.5% of his salary to his personal pension plan. From November 1, 2007 contributions to his designated retirement account ceased and he became a member of the UK defined benefit pension arrangement.

The pension arrangements for Erik Engstrom include life assurance cover while in employment, an entitlement to a pension in the event of ill health or disability and a spouse’s and/or dependants’ pension on death.

The increase in the transfer value of the directors’ pensions, after deduction of contributions, is shown in the table below. Transfer values have been calculated in accordance with the guidance note GN11 published by the UK Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries. The transfer values at December 31, 2012 have been calculated using the transfer value basis adopted by the trustees of the Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme.

The transfer value in respect of individual directors represents a liability in respect of directors’ pension entitlement, and is not an amount paid or payable to the director.

Mark Armour retired on December 31, 2012, at which point he became entitled to a pension of £378,785 per annum.

Transfer values of accrued pension benefits

  Age at
December 31,
2012
  Director’s
contributions
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2011
  Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase in
transfer
value during
the year
(net of
director’s
contributions)
  Accrued
annual
pension at
December 31,
2012
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
  Increase
in

accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
(net of
inflation)
  Transfer
value at

December 31,
2012 of
increase
in accrued
pension
during the
year

(net of
inflation

and director’s
contributions)
 

Erik Engstrom

  49   £9,158   £2,099,132   £2,730,651   £622,361   £180,958   £38,584   £31,750   £469,944  

Mark Armour

  58   £1,944   £6,758,053   £7,525,908   £765,911   £384,878 £30,355   £13,362   £259,332  

*The performance conditions attachedreason for the difference between Mr Armour’s accrued annual pension as at 12.31.12, as stated in the table above, and the annual pension entitlement following retirement is that Mr Armour retired early so there was a reduction made to awardshis accrued annual pension as at 12.31.12.

Duncan Palmer is a member of the UK Reed Elsevier defined contribution pension plan (the Reed Elsevier Pension Plan — REPP). The company contribution is 19% of Mr Palmer’s salary. £50,000 is paid as a contribution to the REPP, being the maximum contribution which can be made under HMRC limits, and the balance is paid to him as a cash allowance, subject to deduction of income tax and national insurance. The pension arrangement for Mr Palmer includes life assurance cover while in employment.

Service contracts

Executive directors are employed under service contracts that provide for a maximum of one year’s notice. The contracts neither specify a pre-determined level of severance payment nor contain specific provisions in respect of a change in control. The Committee believes that as a general rule, notice periods should be 12 months and that the executive directors should, subject to any legal constraints within their base country, be required to mitigate their losses in the event of termination. The Committee will, however, note local market conditions so as to ensure that the terms offered are appropriate to attract and retain top executives operating in global businesses.

The contractual terms of the executive directors (and for approximately 100 other senior executives) include certain covenants as follows:

non-competition restrictions apply which prevent the executive from working in 2010 under this plan mirror those applicable to years one to three (i.e. 2010 through to 2012)a capacity which competes with any Reed Elsevier business which he/she was involved with during the preceding 12 months; from recruiting Reed Elsevier employees and from soliciting Reed Elsevier customers and suppliers for a period of 12 months after leaving employment;

in the event of the REGP (see pages 48executive resigning, he/she will immediately lose all rights to 52 for details). The targets applicableany outstanding awards under the multi-year incentives including any vested but unexercised options; and

in the event of a breach of the covenants, any gains made or payouts received, in the period starting six months prior to and ending 12 months after leaving employment, on the vesting or exercise of awards madefrom the multi-year incentives may be repayable.

Each executive director has a service contract with Reed Elsevier Group plc, as summarised in the table below:

Current
contract date

Date
employment
commenced

Expiry date

(subject to notice
period)

Notice periodSubject to

Erik Engstrom

March 14, 2011 under this plan continueAugust 23, 2004June 14, 202812 monthsEnglish law

Mark Amour

October 7, 1996February 1, 1995Ceased to be aligneda director and retired on December 31, 201212 monthsEnglish law

Duncan Palmer

August 15, 2012August 24, 2012n/a12 monthsEnglish law

Duncan Palmer’s remuneration arrangements

Duncan Palmer’s annual base salary on his recruitment was £600,000 and he has an annual target bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary. He will be eligible to participate in BIP from 2013 onwards up to his target bonus opportunity net of tax and to participate in the ESOS and LTIP, subject to shareholders approving those plans. He will receive annual pension contributions equal to 19% of salary and benefits in accordance with the policies applicable to executive directors.

In addition, in September 2012, he was granted the following awards:

A market value option under ESOS to acquire shares with a face value on the REGP. The vestingdate of awards is alsogrant of 135% of base salary, which vests on the 3rd anniversary of grant subject to participants meeting a minimum shareholding requirement and continued employment (except for certain categories of approved leavers). Dividend equivalents accrueachieving at least 6% p.a. compound growth in adjusted EPS over the performance period andfrom January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014.

Performance shares (PSP) with an aggregate face value of 180% of base salary, which are paid out in cash at the endsubject to the extentsame performance targets as will apply to any matching award that may be granted to the CEO under the REGP in 2013, with performance being assessed in the first half of 2015. The award is non-pensionable and carries a right to receive dividend equivalents (calculated on the same basis as under the REGP). The leaver rules are consistent with those which apply under the REGP with the exception that “retirement with the consent of the company” is not automatically treated as an approved leaver reason for the performance share award.

Restricted shares (RSP) with an aggregate face value of 250% of base salary, which vest 50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015 provided all unvested stock-based awards vest.

The LTIS 2003 enables thegranted to him by his previous employer lapse. This one-off grant of options and restricted shares. Options previously granted under this plan vestedshares was made to compensate Mr Palmer for the forfeiture of awards from his former employer. They are subject to performance and will lapse, to the extent they remain unexercised, on the tenth anniversary ofa time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns, or is summarily terminated, before the date of grant. Nothe announcement of the 2014 annual results in 2015.

The Committee considered the grant of performance shares and restricted shares noted above to have been essential to secure Duncan Palmer’s services. The Committee was satisfied that the awards are appropriate and align his interests with those of shareholders. Both awards fall within paragraph 9.4.2(2)R of the UK Listing Rules and were granted over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares but half of each award will be settled on vesting with Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. The awards cannot be amended to the advantage of Duncan Palmer without shareholder approval and the documentation governing these awards will be available for inspection from the date of the notices of the 2013 Annual General Meetings up to and including the meetings themselves.

In recognition of Mr Palmer and his family having to relocate to the UK in order for him to take up his new position, he will receive a one-off cash relocation allowance of £500,000 in May 2013 (subject to a time pro-rated claw-back if he resigns or is summarily terminated prior to December 31, 2014) and relocation support under the standard Reed Elsevier Policy.

Mark Armour’s retirement terms

Mark Armour’s retirement terms were disclosed in last year’s Report (page 55).

Policy on external appointments

The Committee believes that the experience gained by allowing executive directors to serve as non-executive directors on the boards of other organisations is of benefit to Reed Elsevier. Accordingly, executive directors may, subject to the approval of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, serve as non-executive directors on the boards of up to two non-associated companies (of which only one may be to the board of a major company) and they may retain remuneration arising from such appointments.

Mark Armour is a non-executive director of SABMiller plc and received remuneration of £106,250 during 2012 (£100,694 during 2011). He is also a non-executive director of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and received remuneration of £12,500 since commencing his appointment on July 2, 2012.

Duncan Palmer is a non-executive director of Oshkosh Corporation and received fees of £15,487 since his appointment as a director of Reed Elsevier PLC up to the end of 2012.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Policy on non-executive directors’ fees

The policy on non-executive directors’ fees is a matter for the Boards, subject to applicable law, and does not fall within the Committee’s remit.

Reed Elsevier seeks to recruit non-executive directors with the experience to contribute to the Boards of a dual-listed global business and with a balance of personal skills that will make a major contribution to the Boards and their committee structures. With the exception of Marike van Lier Lels who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, non-executive directors, including the Chairman, are appointed to the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV. Non-executive directors’ fees reflect the directors’ membership of the three Boards.

The primary source for comparative market data is the practice of FTSE 50 companies, although reference is also made to NYSE Euronext Amsterdam (AEX) Index and US listed companies.

Non-executive directors, including the Chairman, serve under letters of appointment and are not entitled to notice of, or payments following, retirement from the Boards.

Fee levels

Non-executive directors receive an annual fee in respect of their memberships of the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc. The fee paid to Marike van Lier Lels, who serves only on the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, reflects her time commitment to that company and to other companies within the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. Non-executive directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending meetings. They do not receive any performance-related bonuses, pension provision, share options or other forms of benefit except for the following: the Chairman is in receipt of private medical benefit and non-executive directors and the Chairman are provided with tax filing support to meet any tax filing obligations arising from their directorships with Reed Elsevier in countries other than their home country.

Fees may be reviewed annually, although in practice they have changed on a less frequent basis. The last fee review was during 2011 and the current fee arrangements took effect on January 1, 2012.

The fees for 2013 are unchanged from 2012 and are set out below.

Annual fee 2013

Chairman

£550,000

Non-executive directors

£65,000/€80,000

Senior Independent Director

£20,000

Chairman of:

— Audit Committee

£25,000/€30,000

— Remuneration Committee

£20,000

The total annual fee payable to Marike van Lier Lels is €65,000 (unchanged from 2012). The Chairman of Reed Elsevier does not receive committee chairman fees.

Directors’ emoluments and fees

(a)Aggregate emoluments

The emoluments of the directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (including any entitlement to fees or emoluments from either Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV) were as follows:

   2012
£
   2011
£
 
   £’000   £’000 

Salaries and fees

   2,972     2,590  

Benefits

   89     56  

Annual performance-related bonuses

   2,074     1,634  

Pension contributions

   44     42  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,179     4,322  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(b)Individual emoluments of executive directors

   Salary
£
   Benefits
£
   Bonus
£
   Total
2012
£
   Total
2011

£
 

Erik Engstrom

   1,050,625     28,396     1,149,909     2,228,930     2,075,417  

Mark Armour

   644,495     23,984     693,799     1,362,278     1,263,563  

Duncan Palmer*

   213,846     32,878     230,205     476,929     n/a  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,908,966     85,258     2,073,913     4,068,137     3,338,980  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

*The benefits figure for Duncan Palmer includes the balance of his company pension contribution which is paid to him as a cash allowance, as detailed under the LTIS 2003Retirement Benefits section on pages 51 and 52 which, for 2012, was £22,810.

Market value options awarded under ESOS and restricted shares awarded in the year of reporting under BIP are set out by executive director on pages 59 to 61. Vesting is subject to performance conditions relating to growth in adjusted EPS and ROIC, as described in the front section of this Report. The maximum number of options that can vest under ESOS and the maximum number of restricted shares that can vest under the BIP is equivalent to the awards granted. The maximum number of shares which can vest under the September 2012 grants of performance share awards and restricted share awards to Duncan Palmer is equivalent to the awards granted. Erik Engstrom was the highest paid director in 2012.

(c)Individual fees of non-executive directors

   2012
£*
  2011
£*
 

Mark Elliott

   85,000    70,000  

Anthony Habgood

   550,000**   500,000** 

Adrian Hennah (from April 20, 2011)

   65,000    38,475  

Lisa Hook

   65,000    55,000  

Marike van Lier Lels

   52,846***   41,739  

Robert Polet

   65,000    55,000  

Sir David Reid

   85,000    75,000  

Lord Sharman (until April 20, 2011)

       18,333  

Linda Sanford (from December 4, 2012)

   5,416      

Ben van der Veer

   89,431***   82,609  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,062,693    936,156  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

*The above figures exclude an imputed notional benefit in 2011respect of tax filing support provided to non-executive directors for tax filings in countries other than their home country resulting from the directorship with Reed Elsevier. The incremental assessable benefit charge per relevant tax return has been agreed by PwC to amount to £300.
**Excludes private medical insurance benefit of £1,389 in respect of 2012 (£1,329 in 2011).
***The fees for Marike van Lier Lels and no awards will be made under this planBen van der Veer are paid in 2012.

Dilution

No options may be granted over new issue shares undereuro and were €65,000 and €110,000 respectively for 2012 (€48,000 and €95,000 respectively for 2011). For reporting purposes these were converted into pounds sterling at the SAYE Scheme, ESOS 2003, ESOS 1993average exchange rate for the year of reporting.

Compensation of executive officers

The aggregate compensation paid during 2012 (and relating to 2012) to those who were executive officers (other than directors) of Reed Elsevier Group plc as at February 27, 2013 as a group for the year ended December 31, 2012 was £2,331,660 which included contributions made to the pension plans in respect of such officers of £84,882.

BOARD PRACTICES

REED ELSEVIER

The Boards of directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV manage their respective shareholdings in Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc are harmonised. Subject to shareholders of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV re-electing retiring directors at their respective Annual General Meetings in 2013, all the directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc will also be directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and of Reed Elsevier NV. For a complete description of the Board membership positions and executive officer positions within Reed Elsevier, see “— Directors” and “Senior Management” on pages 40 to 42. Details of the Audit Committees of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV are given under “Item 15: Controls and Procedures” and details of the Remuneration Committee are given under “— Remuneration Committee” on page 42.

REED ELSEVIER GROUP PLC

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Board currently consists of two executive directors and eight non-executive directors. A person may only be appointed or proposed or recommended for appointment to the Board if that person has been nominated for that appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Persons nominated by the joint Nominations Committee will be required to be approved by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Board, prior to appointment to the Reed Elsevier Group plc Board.

Decisions of the Board of directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc require a simple majority, and the quorum required for meetings of the Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc is any two directors.

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Board has established the following committees:

Audit — currently comprising four independent non-executive directors

Remuneration — currently comprising four independent non-executive directors and LTIS 2003 if they would cause the numberChairman of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares issued or issuable in any 10-year period to exceed in aggregate 10% of the issued share capital of Reed Elsevier PLC from time to time. The number of Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares which may be issued or issuable under the Netherlands Convertible Debenture Stock Scheme, ESOS 2003, ESOS 1993 and LTIS 2003 will be determined by the combined Board of Reed Elsevier NV, but shall not exceed the percentage limit set out above in relation to Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

At December 31, 2011, the estimated potential dilution over a 10-year period from awards over Reed Elsevier PLC shares under all equity-based plans was 5.1% of the Reed Elsevier PLC share capital. The estimated potential dilution over the same period in respect of awards over Reed Elsevier NV shares was 5.3% of the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at December 31, 2011. The estimated potential dilution in relation to executive equity-based plans was 4.6% of the Reed Elsevier PLC and 5% of the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at December 31, 2011.

Share options and conditional share awards

At February 15, 2012 the total number of ordinary shares subject to outstanding options was:

Number of
outstanding
options
Options over
shares
Option price
range

SAYE Scheme

2,203,686Reed Elsevier PLC£4.016 — £5.04

Netherlands Convertible Debenture Stock Scheme

2,105,050Reed Elsevier NV€7.354 — €14.14

ESOS

23,921,336Reed Elsevier PLC£4.20 — £6.81
17,274,663Reed Elsevier NV€7.301 — €15.37

LTIS 2003

2,041,392Reed Elsevier PLC£4.78 — £5.245
1,499,206Reed Elsevier NV€10.30 — €11.35

Share options are expected, upon exercise, to be met principally by the issue of new ordinary shares, but may also be met from shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust.

At February 15, 2012 the following conditional share awards were also outstanding:

Number of
outstanding
awards

Awards over

shares in

REGP

1,037,581

Arrangements established at the time of the merger of Reed Elsevier PLC’s and Reed Elsevier NV’s businesses provide that, if any person (together with persons acting in concert with him) acquires shares, or control of the voting rights attaching to shares, carrying more than 50% of the votes ordinarily exercisable at a general meeting of Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV and has not made a comparable takeover offer for the other party, the other party may by notice suspend or modify the operation of certain provisions of the merger arrangements, such as (i) the right of the party in which control has been acquired (the “Acquired Party”) to appoint or remove directors of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc and (ii) the Standstill Obligations (defined below) in relation to the Acquired Party. Such a notice will cease to apply if the person acquiring control makes a comparable offer for all the equity securities of the other within a specified period or if the person (and persons acting in concert with him) ceases to have control of the other.

In the event of a change of control of one parent company and not the other (where there has been no comparable offer for the other), the parent company which has not suffered the change in control will effectively have the sole right to remove and appoint directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc. Also, a director removed from the Board of a parent company which has suffered a change in control will not have to resign from the Board of the other parent company or Reed Elsevier Group plc.

The Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier Group plc contain certain restrictions on the transfer of shares in Reed Elsevier Group plc. In addition, pursuant to arrangements established at the time of the merger, neither Reed Elsevier PLC nor Reed Elsevier NV may acquire or dispose of any interest in the share capital of the other or otherwise take any action to acquire the other without the prior approval of the other (the “Standstill Obligations”). The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers in the United Kingdom (the “Panel”) has stated that in the event of a change of statutory control of either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV, the person or persons acquiring such control will be required to make an offer to acquire the share capital of Reed Elsevier Group plc (but not Elsevier Reed Finance BV) held by the other, in accordance with the requirements of the City Code on Take-overs and Mergers in the United Kingdom. This requirement would not apply if the person acquiring statutory control of either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV made an offer for the other on terms which are considered by the Panel to be appropriate.

REED ELSEVIER PLC

The Reed Elsevier PLC Board currently consists of two executive directors and eight non-executive directors. A person may only be appointed or proposed or recommended for appointment to the Board if that person has been nominated for that appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Persons nominated by the joint Nominations Committee will be required to be approved by the Reed Elsevier PLC Board, prior to the appointment to the Reed Elsevier PLC Board. A copy of the terms of reference of the Nominations Committee is available on request and can

be viewed on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. The joint Nominations Committee currently comprises five non-executive directors.

Notwithstanding the provisions outlined above in relation to the appointment to the Board, Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders retain their rights under Reed Elsevier PLC’s Articles of Association to appoint directors to the Reed Elsevier PLC Board by ordinary resolution. Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders may also, by ordinary resolution, remove a director from the Board of Reed Elsevier PLC, and in such circumstances that director will also be required to be removed or resign from the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier Group plc (except in circumstances where there has been a change of control of Reed Elsevier PLC and not Reed Elsevier NV).

The Reed Elsevier PLC Board has also established the following committees:

Audit — currently comprising four independent non-executive directors; and

681,372Reed Elsevier NV

BIP*

 2,671,179Reed Elsevier PLC
1,324,493Reed Elsevier NV

RSP

2,138,868Reed Elsevier PLC
1,201,925Reed Elsevier NV

Other multi-year incentives

3,156,849Reed Elsevier PLC
2,092,544Reed Elsevier NV

*For disclosure purposes, any Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ADRs awarded under this plan have been converted into ordinary share equivalents.

These awards will be met by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust from shares purchased in the market.

REED ELSEVIER

Share ownership

The interests of those individuals who were directorsCorporate Governance — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, as at December 31, 2011 in the issued share capitalcomprising all non-executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and members of the respective companies at the beginning and endSupervisory Board of the year are shown below.Reed Elsevier NV.

   Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary
shares
   Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
   January 1,
2011*
   December 31,
2011
   January  1,
2011*
   December 31,
2011
 

Mark Armour

   248,742     248,742     136,889     136,889  

Mark Elliott

                  7,600  

Erik Engstrom

   107,040     107,040     383,450     447,356  

Anthony Habgood

   50,000     50,000     25,000     25,000  

Adrian Hennah

        5,163            

Lisa Hook

                    

Marike van Lier Lels

                    

Robert Polet

        1,000            

Sir David Reid

                    

Lord Sharman

                    

Ben van der Veer

             1,298     5,000  

*On date of appointment if subsequent to January 1, 2011.

The interests of

Reed Elsevier Group plc has established a Remuneration Committee, which is responsible for determining the remuneration for the executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Reed Elsevier NV.

Under the Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier PLC, one third of the directors shall retire from office and, if they wish, make themselves available for re-appointment by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Notwithstanding these provisions in the Articles of Association, in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code all directors retire and offer themselves for re-election at each Annual General Meeting.

REED ELSEVIER NV

Reed Elsevier NV has a two-tier board structure currently comprising two executive directors (the “Executive Board”) and nine non-executive directors (the “Supervisory Board” and, together with the Executive Board, the “Combined Board”, all together referred to as the “Boards”). Members of the Boards shall be appointed by the General Shareholders’ Meeting upon a proposal of the Combined Board based on a nomination for appointment by the joint Nominations Committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC. The Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV provide that a resolution of the General Shareholders’ Meeting to appoint a member of the Boards other than in accordance with a proposal of the Combined Board can only be taken by a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast if less than one-half of Reed Elsevier NV’s issued capital is represented at the meeting.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of Reed Elsevier NV shareholders may also, by ordinary resolution, resolve to suspend or dismiss each member from the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV. In addition, each member of the Executive Board can at any time be suspended by the Supervisory Board. In such circumstances that director will also be required to be removed or resign from the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier Group plc (except in circumstances where there has been a change of control of Reed Elsevier NV and not Reed Elsevier PLC).

The Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board has established the following committees:

Audit — currently comprising four members of the Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board; and

Corporate Governance — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC, comprising all members of the Supervisory Board and non-executive directors of each company.

Nominations — a joint committee of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC, currently comprising five members of the Supervisory Board including the Chairman of the Supervisory Board.

Reed Elsevier Group plc has established a Remuneration Committee, which is responsible for determining the remuneration for the executive directors of Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Reed Elsevier PLC.

Under the Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV, each member of the Reed Elsevier NV Supervisory Board is appointed for a three-year term, with the possibility of reappointment and shall retire periodically in accordance with a rotation plan drawn up by the Combined Board. Notwithstanding these provisions in the Articles of Association, in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code all members of the Boards retire and seek re-appointment at each Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. To align the arrangements regarding appointment for the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC annual re-appointment shall not affect the term of their three-year appointment. A schedule with the anticipated dates of retirement of members of the Supervisory Board is published on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. As a general rule, members of the Supervisory Board serve for two three-year terms. The Nominations Committee may recommend that individual members of the Supervisory Board serve up to one additional three-year term.

The Combined Board of Reed Elsevier NV has resolved to take the necessary steps to establish a one-tier governance structure at Reed Elsevier NV. For this purpose the articles of association of Reed Elsevier NV will have to be amended and a proposal for the one-tier governance structure will be put to the Annual General Meeting of shareholders on April 24, 2013.

ELSEVIER REED FINANCE BV

Elsevier Reed Finance BV has a two-tier board structure comprising a Management Board, currently consisting of three members, and a Supervisory Board, currently consisting of four members. The members of the Management Board and of the Supervisory Board are appointed by the shareholders of Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Articles of Association of Elsevier Reed Finance BV provide that certain material resolutions of the Management Board will require the approval of the Supervisory Board. At a meeting of the Supervisory Board valid resolutions can be taken with a simple majority if the majority of the members are present or represented. Pursuant to the Articles of Association of Elsevier Reed Finance BV, there are specific provisions governing the appointment and dismissal of managing directors and members of the Supervisory Board during periods when a notice of suspension as mentioned in the governing agreement between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV is in force. These provisions intend to neutralise the influence of a party which has acquired control over either Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV without having also acquired control in the other.

EMPLOYEES

Employee numbers are disclosed in note 6 to the combined financial statements.

The Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc is fully committed to the concept of employee involvement and participation, and encourages each of its businesses to formulate its own tailor-made approach with the co-operation of employees. Reed Elsevier is an equal opportunity employer, and recruits and promotes employees on the basis of suitability for the job. Appropriate training and development opportunities are available to all employees. A code of ethics and business conduct applicable to employees within Reed Elsevier has been adopted throughout its businesses.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

Share based awards in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV

Details of vested options,(in italics)and unvested options and restricted shares held by executive directors in Reed Elsevier PLC (PLC) and Reed Elsevier NV (NV) as at December 31, 2012 are shown in the tables below. Any awards that have been described as lapsed in prior year Reports have been excluded. The shading in the tables denotes awards granted during the year of reporting. The vesting of outstanding unvested awards is subject to performance conditions in accordance with the provisions of the respective plan rules. For disclosure purposes, any PLC and NV ADRs awarded under the BIP have been converted into ordinary share equivalents. At the date of this Report there have been no changes in the options or restricted shares held by executive directors in office at the date of this Report. The market price at the date of award of grants made under the multi-year incentives are based on the middle market price of the respective security.

Erik Engstrom

Options

 Year of
grant
 

Option
over:

 No. of
options
held on
Jan 1,
2012
  No. of
options
granted
during
2012
  Option
price
  No. of
options
exercised
during
2012
 Market
price per
share at
exercise
 Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
 No. of
options
held on
Dec 31,
2012
  Unvested
options
vesting on:
  Options
exercisable
until:
 

ESOS

 2004 PLC ord  63,460    £4.780       63,460     Aug 23, 2014  
  NV ord  43,866    10.30       43,866     Aug 23, 2014  
 2005 PLC ord  154,517    £5.335       154,517     Feb 17, 2015  
  NV ord  105,412    11.31       105,412     Feb 17, 2015  
 2006 PLC ord  178,895    £5.305       178,895     Mar 13,2016  
  NV ord  120,198    11.47       120,198     Mar 13,2016  
 2011 PLC ord  139,146    £5.390       139,146    May 5, 2014    May 5, 2021  
  NV ord  92,953    8.969       92,953    May 5, 2014    May 5, 2021  
 2012 PLC ord      198,836   £5.155       198,836    May 2, 2015    May 2, 2022  
  NV ord      139,742   9.030       139,742    May 2, 2015    May 2, 2022  

LTIP

 2004 PLC ord  325,163    £4.78       325,163     Aug 23, 2014  
  NV ord  224,766    10.30       224,766     Aug 23, 2014  
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total PLC ords

    861,181    198,836        1,060,017    

Total NV ord

    587,195    139,742        726,937    
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Shares

 Year of
grant
 Type of
security
 No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Jan 1,
2012
  No. of
shares
awarded
during
2012
  Market
price per
share at
award
  No. of
shares
vested
during
2012
 Market
price per
share at
vesting
 Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
 No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Dec 31,
2012
  Date of
performance
testing
  Date of
release
 

BIP

 2010 NV ord  140,378    8.310       140,378    H1 2013    H1 2013  
 2011 NV ord  122,352    8.969       122,352    H1 2014    H1 2014  
 2012 NV ord      136,950   9.030       136,950    H1 2015    H1 2015  

REGP

 2010 PLC ord  643,086    £4.665       643,086    H1 2013    50% H1 2013  
               50% H1 2015  
  NV ord  422,310    8.310       422,310    H1 2013    50% H1 2013  
            50% H1 2015  
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Total PLC ords

    643,086         643,086    

Total NV ord

    685,040    136,950        821,990    
   

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Mark Armour

Options

  

Year of
grant

  Option
over
  No. of
options
held on
Jan 1,
2012
   No. of
options
granted
during
2012
  Option
price
   No. of
options
exercised
during
2012
   Market
price per
share at
exercise
   Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
   No. of
options
held on
Dec 31,
2012
   Unvested
options
vesting on:
  Options
exercisable
until:
 

ESOS

  2002  PLC ord   74,000      £6.000                  Expired
    NV ord   51,926      13.94                  Expired
  2005  PLC ord   150,422      £5.335           150,422       Feb 17, 2015  
    NV ord   102,618      11.31           102,618       Feb 17, 2015  
  2006  PLC ord   158,836      £5.305     1,500    £6.095    £1,185     157,336       Mar 13,2016  
    NV ord   106,720      11.47           106,720       Mar 13,2016  
  2011  PLC ord   85,358      £5.390           56,905       May 9, 2016** 
    NV ord   57,021      8.969           38,014       May 9, 2016** 

LTIP

  2004  PLC ord   290,481      £4.872           290,481       Feb 19, 2014  
    NV ord   199,467      10.57           199,467       Feb 19, 2014  

SAYE

  2010  PLC ord   2,173      £4.176           2,173       Jun 30, 2013  
      

 

 

             

 

 

     

Total PLC ords

       761,270         1,500         657,317      

Total NV ord

       517,752               446,819      
      

 

 

             

 

 

     

*Expired unexercised on February 22 2012.

**Pro-rated for service.

Shares

  

Year of
grant

  Type of
security
  No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Jan 1,
2012
   No. of
shares
awarded
during
2012
   Market
price per
share at
award
   No. of
shares
vested
during
2012
  Market
price per
share at
vesting
  Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
  No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Dec 31,
2012
   Date of
performance
testing
   Date of
release
 

BIP

  2010  PLC ord   65,054      £4.665           65,054     H1 2013     H1 2013  
    NV ord   42,512      8.310           42,512     H1 2013     H1 2013  
  2011  PLC ord   56,876      £5.390           37,917     H1 2014     H1 2014
    NV ord   37,687      8.969           25,124     H1 2014     H1 2014
  2012  PLC ord        90,987    £5.115           30,329     H1 2015     H1 2015
    NV ord        21,028    9.030           7,009     H1 2015     H1 2015

REGP

  2010  PLC ord   394,495      £4.665           394,495     H1 2013     H1 2013  
    NV ord   259,062      8.310           259,062     H1 2013     H1 2013  
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

Total PLC ords

       516,425     90,987             527,795      

Total NV ord

       339,261     21,028             333,707      
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

*Pro-rated for service.

Duncan Palmer

Options

  

Year of
grant

  Option
over
  No. of
options
held on
Jan 1,
2012
   No. of
options
granted
during
2012
   Option
price
   No. of
options
exercised
during
2012
  Market
price per
share at
exercise
  Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
  No. of
options
held on
Dec 31,
2012
   Unvested
options
vesting on:
   Options
exercisable
until:
 

ESOS

  2012  PLC ord        67,331    £6.015           67,331     Sep 7, 2015     Sep 7, 2022  
    NV ord        48,018    10.560           48,018     Sep 7, 2015     Sep 7, 2022  
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

Total PLC ords

            67,331             67,331      

Total NV ord

            48,018             48,018      
      

 

 

   

 

 

           

 

 

     

Shares

  

Year of
grant

  Type of
security
   No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Jan 1,
2012
  No. of
shares
awarded
during
2012
   Market
price per
share at
award
   No. of
shares
vested
during
2012
  Market
price per
share at
vesting
  Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
  No. of
unvested
shares
held on
Dec 31,
2012
   Date of
performance
testing
   Date of
release
 

PSP*

  2012   PLC ord       179,551    £6.015           179,551     H1 2015     H1 2015  

RSP*

  2012   PLC ord       249,376    £6.015           249,376          50% H1 2014  
                       50% H1 2015  
        

 

 

           

 

 

     

Total PLC ords

         428,927             428,927      

Total NV ord

                            
        

 

 

           

 

 

     

*Half of Duncan Palmer’s 2012 PSP and RSP awards which vest, if any, will be settled with Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. The number of NV shares will be calculated using the closing price of a Reed Elsevier NV share and the euro/pound sterling exchange rate on the date of grant.

The number of shares and options that vest in respect of all outstanding (unvested) awards under the multi-year incentives depend on the extent to which performance conditions are met, except for the RSP grant to Duncan Palmer which vests subject to an ongoing employment condition.

In respect of the REGP grant to Erik Engstrom, the maximum number of shares that can vest is 150% of the number of shares shown in the tables above. In respect of ESOS and BIP, the number of share options and shares shown in the table is the maximum capable of vesting. ESOS awards vest on the third anniversary and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. For the PSP and RSP awards granted to Duncan Palmer, the number of shares shown in the share tables reflects the maximum number of shares which can vest.

Options under the SAYE Scheme, in which all eligible UK employees are invited to participate, are granted at a maximum discount of 20% to the market price at time of grant. They are normally exercisable after the expiry of three or five years from the date of grant. No performance targets are attached to these option grants as the SAYE Scheme is a UK all-employee scheme.

The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share at the date of award of grants in 2012 under the BIP was £5.155. The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share at the date of award of grants in 2012 under the BIP was €9.03. The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share at the date of award of grants made to Mr Palmer on September 7, 2012 was €6.015.

The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share during the year was in the range of £4.694 to £6.52 and at December 31, 2012 was £6.42. The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share during the year was in the range of €8.17 to €11.37 and at December 31, 2012 was €11.185.

REED ELSEVIER

As of December 31, 2012 Reed Elsevier operated and/or had awards outstanding under a number of equity-based plans as follows:

(i)All-Employee Equity-Based Plans

Reed Elsevier’s all-employee equity-based plans comprise the following two plans. Mr Engstrom and Mr Palmer have waived their right to participate in any local all-employee share based plans in any country.

(a)Reed Elsevier Group plc SAYE Share Option Scheme (the SAYE Scheme)

Options over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares have been granted under the SAYE Scheme. Shares may be acquired at not less than the higher of (i) 80% of the closing middle market price for the relevant share on The London Stock Exchange three days before invitations to apply for options are issued, and (ii) if new shares are to be subscribed, their nominal value.

All UK employees of Reed Elsevier Group plc and participating companies under its control in employment at the date of invitation are entitled to participate in the SAYE Scheme. In addition, the directors of Reed Elsevier Group plc may permit other employees of Reed Elsevier Group plc and participating companies under its control to participate.

Invitations to apply for options may normally only be issued within 42 days after the announcement of the combined results of Reed Elsevier for any period. No options may be granted more than 10 years after the approval of the scheme.

On joining the SAYE Scheme, a save as you earn contract (a Savings Contract) must be entered into with an appropriate savings body, under which savings of between £10 and £250 per month may be made to such savings body for a period of three or five years. A bonus may be payable under the Savings Contract at the end of the savings period. The amount of the monthly contributions may be reduced if applications exceed the number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares available for the grant of options on that occasion.

The number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares over which an option may be granted is limited to that number of shares which may be acquired at the exercise price out of the repayment proceeds (including any bonus) of the Savings Contract.

Options under the SAYE Scheme may normally only be exercised for a period of six months after the bonus date under the relevant Savings Contract. However, options may be exercised earlier than the normal exercise date in certain specified circumstances, including death, reaching age 60, or on ceasing employment on account of injury, disability, redundancy, reaching contractual retirement age, or the sale of the business or subsidiary for which the participant works, or provided the option has been held for at least three years, on ceasing employment for any other reason. Exercise is allowed in the event of an amalgamation, reconstruction or take-over of the company whose shares are under option; alternatively, such options may, with the agreement of an acquiring company or a company associated with it, be exchanged for options over shares in the acquiring company or that associated company. Options may also be exercised in the event of the voluntary winding-up of the company whose shares are under option. In the event that options are exercised before the bonus date, the participant may acquire only the number of shares that can be purchased with the accumulated savings up to the date of exercise, plus interest (if any).

In the event of any capitalisation or rights issue by Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV, or of any consolidation, subdivision or reduction of their share capital, the number of shares subject to any relevant option and/or the exercise price may be adjusted with the approval of the UK HMRC, subject to the independent auditors of Reed Elsevier Group plc confirming in writing that such adjustment is, in their opinion, fair and reasonable.

(b)Convertible debenture stock arrangements

This facility consists of an annual issue by Reed Elsevier NV of a convertible debenture loan (the Netherlands Convertible Debenture Stock Scheme) that is open for subscription by Dutch staff employed by Reed Elsevier companies in the Netherlands or temporarily seconded to affiliates abroad. The interest rate of the scheme is determined quarterly on the basis of market rates on internet savings accounts in the Netherlands. With effect from February 19, 2004 for new issues, interest is determined quarterly on the basis of market rates on internet savings accounts in the Netherlands. Employees can annually subscribe for one or more debentures of €200 each, up to a maximum amount equal to 20% of the equivalent of their fixed annual salary components. Interest is payable in arrears in the month of January following the subscription year. The loans have a term of 10 years. During the 10-year term of the loan employees can decide to convert their claim on the Company into shares at an exercise price equal to the price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share on NYSE Euronext Amsterdam at the end of the month in which the employee has subscribed for the loan (the exercise price). Each debenture of €200 can be converted into 50 ordinary shares in Reed Elsevier NV against payment of 50 times the exercise price, less €200.

(ii)Executive Equity-Based Plans

Reed Elsevier’s executive equity-based plans comprise:

(a)Reed Elsevier Group plc Growth Plan (REGP)

The details of how the REGP operates have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports. The performance measures and targets are disclosed in this Report on pages 47 to 49.

(b)Long-term incentive plans (LTIP)

The plans in this category comprise Reed Elsevier Group plc Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 (LTIP 2010) and the Reed Elsevier Group plc Long-Term Incentive Share Option Scheme 2003 (LTIS 2003) (details of LTIS 2003 have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports).

The LTIP 2010 was implemented in 2010. The plan applies to senior executives (including executive officers) other than executive directors. Awards are in the form of restricted shares which vest subject to performance over three financial years. Awards are satisfied with shares purchased in the market. The performance conditions attached to awards made in 2010 under this plan mirror those applicable to years one to three (i.e. 2010 through to 2012) of the REGP (see pages 47 to 49 for details). The targets applicable to awards made in 2012 under this plan continue to be aligned to the REGP. The vesting of awards is also subject to participants meeting a minimum shareholding requirement and continued employment (except for certain categories of approved leavers). Dividend equivalents accrue over the performance period and are paid out in cash at the end to the extent that the awards vest.

The LTIS 2003 enabled the grant of options and restricted shares. Options previously granted under this plan vested subject to performance and will lapse to the extent they remain unexercised, on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. No awards were made under the LTIS 2003 in 2012 and no awards will be made under this plan in 2013.

(c)Executive share option schemes (ESOS)

The plans in this category comprise the Reed Elsevier Group plc Share Option Scheme 2003 (ESOS 2003) (details of ESOS 2003 have been disclosed in previous years’ Reports), the Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive U.K. Share Option Scheme 1993 and the Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive Overseas Share Option Scheme 1993 (together ESOS 1993). ESOS 1993 has expired and all outstanding awards under these plans have vested and will lapse, to the extent they remain unexercised, on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

(d)Bonus investment plans (BIP)

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan 2010 (BIP 2010) (see page 50 for a description of this plan) is a voluntary plan aimed at encouraging personal investment in, and ongoing holding of, Reed Elsevier shares to promote greater alignment with shareholders and support the retention of key talent. Awards were made in 2012 under BIP 2010.

No awards were made in 2012 under the BIP 2003 and no awards will be made under this plan in 2013. There are no further awards outstanding under BIP 2003.

(e)Reed Elsevier Group plc Retention Share Plan (RSP)

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Retention Share Plan is a share plan operated under the discretion of the Reed Elsevier Remuneration Committee which approves all grants. It facilitates the grant of restricted share awards over Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares, subject to such conditions as specified from time to time by the Reed Elsevier Remuneration Committee. Participation in the plan is limited to employees of Reed Elsevier and participating companies under its control, excluding executive directors.

The plan is used to facilitate the grant of one-off awards of restricted shares, where appropriate, to senior new hires, for example, to buy out share-based awards from previous employment.

In addition, since 2006, employees eligible to participate in the ESOS 2003 (see (c) above), other than executive directors, have been able to choose prior to the date of grant whether to receive all or part of their grant in the form of restricted shares based on a pre-determined conversion ratio of one share for every five options that would otherwise be granted to them under ESOS 2003. The RSP is the vehicle used to deliver the award of restricted shares. The restricted shares vest after the expiry of three years from the date of grant, subject to the participant remaining employed by Reed Elsevier or a participating company under its control. The restricted shares awarded are satisfied by market purchase shares.

On termination of employment, unvested awards made under the plan lapse (except for certain categories of approved leavers).

Note that the RSP award granted to Duncan Palmer on recruitment was not granted under this plan. The terms of that award are described on page 53 and in Exhibit 4.16 incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (see “Item 19: Exhibits” on pages S-3 and S-4 of this Annual Report).

Dilution

At December 31, 2012, the estimated potential dilution over a 10-year period from awards over Reed Elsevier PLC shares under all equity-based plans was 4.7% of the Reed Elsevier PLC share capital. The estimated potential dilution over the same period in respect of awards over Reed Elsevier NV shares was 4.9% of the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at December 31, 2012. The estimated potential dilution in relation to executive equity-based plans was 4.3% of the Reed Elsevier PLC and 4.5% of the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at December 31, 2012.

Share options and conditional share awards

At February 27, 2013 the total number of ordinary shares subject to outstanding options was:

Number of
outstanding
options
Options over
shares
Option price
range

SAYE Scheme

1,906,531Reed Elsevier PLC£4.016 — £5.04

Netherlands Convertible Debenture Stock Scheme

1,646,650Reed Elsevier NV€9.00 — €11.445

ESOS

14,332,846Reed Elsevier PLC£4.20 — £6.465
11,820,201Reed Elsevier NV€7.301 — €14.51

LTIS 2003

872,434Reed Elsevier PLC£4.78 — £5.115
841,284Reed Elsevier NV€10.30 — €11.35

Share options are expected, upon exercise, to be met principally by the issue of new ordinary shares, but may also be met from shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust.

At February 27, 2013 the following conditional share awards were also outstanding:

Number of
outstanding
awards

Awards over
shares in

REGP

1,037,581Reed Elsevier PLC
681,372Reed Elsevier NV

LTIP

4,366,321Reed Elsevier PLC
2,835,149Reed Elsevier NV

BIP*

3,828,855Reed Elsevier PLC
1,827,523Reed Elsevier NV

RSP

2,441,066Reed Elsevier PLC
1,273,587Reed Elsevier NV

*For disclosure purposes, any Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV in the issuedADRs awarded under this plan have been converted into ordinary share equivalents.

These awards will be met by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust from shares purchased in the market.

REED ELSEVIER

Share ownership

The interests of those individuals who were directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV as at December 31, 2012 in the issued share capital of the respective companies at the beginning and end of the year are shown below.

   Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
   Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
   January 1,
2012*
   December 31,
2012
   January 1,
2012*
   December 31,
2012
 

Mark Armour

   248,742     250,242     136,889     136,889  

Mark Elliott

             7,600     7,600  

Erik Engstrom

   107,040     107,040     447,356     509,556  

Anthony Habgood

   50,000     50,000     25,000     25,000  

Adrian Hennah

   5,163     5,163            

Lisa Hook

                  4,800  

Marike van Lier Lels

                    

Duncan Palmer

                    

Robert Polet

   1,000     1,000         

Sir David Reid

                    

Linda Sanford

                    

Ben van der Veer

             5,000     5,000  

*On date of the respective companies as at March 7, 2012appointment if subsequent to January 1, 2012.

The interests of the current executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV in the issued share capital of the respective companies as at March 7, 2013 were:

   Interest in
Reed Elsevier
PLC ordinary
shares
   Interest in
Reed Elsevier
NV ordinary
shares
 

Erik Engstrom

   107,040     509,556  

Duncan Palmer

   88     126  

Employee Benefit Trust

Any securities required to satisfy entitlements under the REGP, the RSP, the BIP and the other multi-year incentives are provided by the Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) from market purchases. As a potential beneficiary under the EBT in the same way as other employees of Reed Elsevier, each executive director is deemed to be interested in all the shares held by the EBT which at December 31, 2012 amounted to 13,451,468 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (1.07% of issued share capital) and 6,990,101 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (0.91% of issued share capital). These numbers include ordinary share equivalents held in the form of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRS.

Shares and options held by executive officers

The following table indicates the total aggregate number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares beneficially owned and the total aggregate number of share options and conditional share awards held by the executive officers (other than directors) of Reed Elsevier Group plc (three persons) as a group in office as of February 27, 2013:

   Reed
Elsevier
PLC
ordinary
shares
  Reed
Elsevier
PLC
ordinary
shares
subject to
options
  Reed
Elsevier
PLC
conditional
share
awards
  Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary
shares*
  Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary
shares
subject to
options
  Reed
Elsevier NV
conditional
share
awards

Executive officers (other than directors) as a group

  147,104  431,407  589,823  37,547  349,658  295,558

 

   Interest in
Reed Elsevier
PLC ordinary
shares
   Interest in
Reed Elsevier
NV ordinary
shares
 

Erik Engstrom

   107,040     447,356  

Mark Armour

   248,742     136,889  

Employee Benefit Trust

Any securities required to satisfy entitlements under the REGP, the RSP, the BIP and the other multi-year incentives are provided by the Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) from market purchases. As a potential beneficiary under the EBT in the same way as other employees of Reed Elsevier, each executive director is deemed to be interested in all the shares held by the EBT

which at December 31, 2011 amounted to 14,051,025 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (1.12% of issued share capital) and 7,380,906
*The Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (0.96% of issued share capital). These numbers includeare in registered form, although most ordinary share equivalents heldshares are traded in the form of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRS.

Shares and options heldDutch Security giro system administered by executive officers

The following table indicates the total aggregate number of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares beneficially owned and the total aggregate number of share options and conditional share awards held by the executive officers (other than directors) of Reed Elsevier Group plc (three persons) as a group in office as of February 15, 2012:

   Reed
Elsevier
PLC
ordinary
shares
   Reed
Elsevier
PLC
ordinary
shares
subject to
options
   Reed
Elsevier
PLC
conditional
share
awards
   Reed
Elsevier  NV
ordinary
shares*
   Reed
Elsevier  NV
ordinary
shares
subject to
options
   Reed
Elsevier  NV
conditional
share
awards
 

Executive officers (other than directors) as a group

   126,452     438,467     332,223     35,155     290,886     203,548  

Euroclear Netherlands.

The options over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares included in the above table are exercisable at prices ranging from £4.665 to £6.445 per share and between the date hereof and 2022. The options over Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares included in the above table are exercisable at prices ranging from €8.31 to €14.51 per share and between the date hereof and 2022. The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV conditional share awards included in the above table will vest between 2013 and 2015.

*The Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares are in registered form, although most ordinary shares are traded in the Dutch Security giro system administered by Euroclear Netherlands.

The options over Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares included in the above table are exercisable at prices ranging from £4.665 to £6.445 per share and between the date hereof and 2021. The options over Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares included in the above table are exercisable at prices ranging from €8.31 to €14.51 per share and between the date hereof and 2021. The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV conditional share awards included in the above table will vest between 2012 and 2014.

ITEM 7: MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

REED ELSEVIER PLC

Substantial share interests

As at March 7, 2012,

ITEM 7: MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

REED ELSEVIER PLC

Substantial share interests

As at March 7, 2013, the company had been notified by the following shareholders that they held an interest of 3% or more in voting rights(1) of the issued share capital of the company:

Identity of Person or Group(2)

% of Class

Franklin Mutual Advisors, LLC

5.04

BlackRock Inc

5.03

Silchester International Investors Limited

3.99

Lloyds Banking Group plc

3.98

The Capital Group Companies, Inc.

3.90

Legal & General Group plc

3.40

The percentage interests stated above are as disclosed at the date on which the interests were notified to the company.

(1)Under the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules, subject to certain limited exceptions, persons or groups with an interest of 3% or more in voting rights of the issued Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share capital are required to notify Reed Elsevier PLC of their interest.

(2)Under the UK Large and medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, Reed Elsevier PLC is required to disclose information they are aware of regarding the identity of each person with a significant direct or indirect holding of securities in Reed Elsevier PLC as at the financial year end.

As far as Reed Elsevier PLC is aware, except as disclosed herein, it is neither directly or indirectly owned nor controlled by one or more corporations or by any government.

At December 31, 2012 there were 18,064 ordinary shareholders, including the depository for Reed Elsevier PLC’s ADR programme, with a registered address in the United Kingdom, representing 99.65% of shares issued.

Reed Elsevier PLC is not aware of any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of Reed Elsevier PLC. The major shareholders of Reed Elsevier PLC do not have different voting rights to other ordinary shareholders.

REED ELSEVIER NV

As of March 7, 2013 Reed Elsevier NV is aware of the following disclosable interests of 5% or more in the issued Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares based on the public database of and on notification received from the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets(1) or provided as a Schedule 13G filing(2):

Identity of Person or Group

% of Class

Reed Elsevier PLC(3)

5.89

(1)Under Article 5:38 of the Netherlands Financial Markets Supervision Act, any person acquiring or disposing of shares or voting rights in public companies established under the laws of the Netherlands listed on a stock exchange in the European Union, is required to notify the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) without delay if such person knows, or should know, that such interest therein reaches, exceeds or drops below a 5% or 10% threshold. No interest in the shares or voting rights of Reed Elsevier NV of 10% or more has been disclosed in the AFM’s registers.

(2)The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires any person who has, as at the end of the calendar year, a direct or indirect beneficial interest in 5% or more of the issued share capital of a company, to file a statement on Schedule 13G with the company:

Securities and Exchange Commission reporting such interest within 45 days following the end of the calendar year.

 

(3)

Identity of Person or Group

% of Class

Lloyds Banking Group plc

6.89

BlackRock Inc

5.02

Silchester International Investors Limited

3.98

Legal & General Group plc

3.40

The percentage interests stated above are as disclosed at the date on which the interests were notified to the company.

(1)Under the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules, subject to certain limited exceptions, persons or groups with an interest of 3% or more in voting rights of the issued Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share capital are required to notify Reed Elsevier PLC of their interest.

(2)Under the UK Large and medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, Reed Elsevier PLC is required to disclose information they are aware of regarding the identity of each person with a significant direct or indirect holding of securities in Reed Elsevier PLC as at the financial year end.

As far as Reed Elsevier PLC is aware, except as disclosed herein, it is neither directly or indirectly owned nor controlled by one or more corporations or by any government.

At December 31, 2011 there were 18,771 ordinary shareholders, including the depository for Reed Elsevier PLC’s ADR programme, withinterest comprises a registered address in the United Kingdom, representing 99.65%holding of R shares issued.

Reed Elsevier PLC is not aware of any arrangements the operation of which may at€0.70 nominal value each held by a subsequent date result in a change in control of Reed Elsevier PLC. The major shareholderssubsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC, do not have different voting rights to other ordinary shareholders.

REED ELSEVIER NV

As of March 7, 2012 Reed Elsevier NV is aware of the following disclosable interests of 5% or more in the issued Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares based on the public database of and on notification received from the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets(1) or provided asrepresents a Schedule 13G filing(2):

Identity of Person or Group

% of Class

Reed Elsevier PLC(3)

5.80

Mondrian Investment Partners Limited

5.24

(1)Under Article 5:38 of the Netherlands Financial Markets Supervision Act, any person acquiring or disposing of shares or voting rights in public companies established under the laws of the Netherlands listed on a stock exchange in the European Union, is required to notify the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) without delay if such person knows, or should know, that such interest therein reaches, exceeds or drops below a 5% or 10% threshold. No interest in the shares or voting rights of Reed Elsevier NV of 10% or more has been disclosed in the AFM’s registers.

(2)The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires any person who has, as at the end of the calendar year, a direct or indirect beneficial interest in 5% or more of the issued share capital of a company, to file a statement on Schedule 13G with the Securities and Exchange Commission reporting such interest within 45 days following the end of the calendar year.

(3)Reed Elsevier PLC’s interest comprises a holding of R shares of €0.70 nominal value each held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC, and represent a 5.8%5.89% indirect equity interest in the total share capital of Reed Elsevier NV.

As far as Reed Elsevier NV is aware, except as disclosed herein, it is neither directly nor indirectly owned or controlled by any single corporation or corporations acting jointly, nor by any government.

Reed Elsevier NV is not aware of any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of Reed Elsevier NV. The major shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV do not have different voting rights to other ordinary shareholders.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with joint ventures and key management personnel, comprising the executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, are set out in note 34 to the combined financial statements. Further details of remuneration of key management personnel are set out in “Item 6 — Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.

ITEM 8: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See Item 18: Financial Statements.

DIVIDEND POLICY

Dividends to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level, including the benefit of the UK attributable tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The exchange rate used for each dividend calculation as defined in the Reed Elsevier merger agreement is the spot euro/sterling exchange rate, averaged over a period of five business days commencing with the tenth business day before the announcement of the proposed dividend. The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have adopted dividend policies in recent years in respect of their equalised dividends that, subject to currency considerations, more closely align dividend growth with growth in adjusted earnings, consistent with the dividend normally being covered over the longer term at least two times by adjusted earnings (i.e. before the amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items, related tax effects, exceptional prior year tax credits and movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and afterinclude the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets).

Reed Elsevier NV may resolve that the dividend to be paid on each R Shareshare shall be lower than the dividend to be paid on each ordinary share, but not less than 1% of the nominal value of an R Share.share.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in 2005, various of Reed Elsevier’s subsidiaries in the United States became the subject of legal proceedings and federal and state regulatory actions relating to data security breaches, pursuant to which unauthorised persons obtained personal identifying information from Reed Elsevier data bases,databases, or alleged breaches of federal privacy laws in connection with the obtaining and disclosure by such subsidiaries of information without the consent of the individuals involved. The principal actions and investigations have been settled, with the substantial portion of cash payments agreed to be paid by these subsidiaries being reimbursed by insurance and third-party indemnities. The settlements generally require strict data security programs, submissions of regulatory reports and on-going monitoring by independent third parties to ensure Reed Elsevier’s compliance with the terms of those settlements. While the costs of such on-going monitoring will be borne by Reed Elsevier, neither the costs of compliance nor the costs of such on-going monitoring are expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or the results of our operations.

Many of the products offered by LexisNexis Risk Solutions and ChoicePoint areis governed by the US Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Graham Leach Bliley Act (“GLBA”), Drivers Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”) and analogousrelated state laws requiring that consumers be provided certain notices. Certain of these laws further provide for statutory penalties and attorneys fees for non-compliance. In the normal course of its business, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and ChoicePoint dealdeals with individual and class lawsuits claiming violation of one or more of these statutes. Other than pending matters, these cases have either been settled or successfully defended to date with a substantial portion of cash payments agreed to be paid by insurance. These proceedings have not had, and are not expected to have, a material adverse effect on our financial position or the results of our operations.

We are party to various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, the ultimate resolutions of which are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or the results of our operations.

ITEM 9: THE OFFER AND LISTING

TRADING MARKETS

REED ELSEVIER PLC

The Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. The London Stock Exchange is the principal trading market for Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares. Trading on the New York Stock Exchange is in the form of American Depositary Shares (ADSs), evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) issued by The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary. Each ADS represents four Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing middle market quotations for the Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares on the London Stock Exchange as derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange and the high and low last reported sales prices in US dollars for the Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange, as derived from the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, and reported by Thomson Reuters Datastream:

 

  Pence per ordinary share   US dollars per ADS       Pence per ordinary share           US dollars per ADS     

Calendar Periods

  High   Low   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low 

2012

   652     469     42.04     28.90  

2011

   591     461     37.74     29.61     591     461     37.74     29.61  

2010

   563     461     35.70     26.82     563     461     35.70     26.82  

2009

   560     420     33.56     26.20     560     420     33.56     26.20  

2008

   690     451     54.60     27.06     690     451     54.60     27.06  

2007

   690     558     54.85     44.02     690     558     54.85     44.02  

2006

   608     504     46.17     35.90  

2012

        

Fourth Quarter

   652     598     42.04     38.25  

Third Quarter

   608     506     39.34     31.53  

Second Quarter

   565     469     36.24     28.90  

First Quarter

   563     509     35.75     31.44  

2011

                

Fourth Quarter

   555     489     35.93     30.33     555     489     35.93     30.33  

Third Quarter

   578     461     36.99     29.61     578     461     36.99     29.61  

Second Quarter

   566     526     36.89     34.13     566     526     36.89     34.13  

First Quarter

   591     506     37.74     32.20     591     506     37.74     32.20  

2010

                

Fourth Quarter

   563     509     35.65     31.73     563     509     35.65     31.73  

Third Quarter

   561     490     35.70     29.74     561     490     35.70     29.74  

Second Quarter

   545     461     33.94     26.82     545     461     33.94     26.82  

First Quarter

   526     482     33.71     29.91     526     482     33.71     29.91  

2009

        

Fourth Quarter

   516     455     32.93     29.38  

Third Quarter

   492     420     32.48     27.67  

Second Quarter

   543     452     33.56     27.55  

First Quarter

   560     477     32.36     26.20  

Month

                

February 2012 (through February 15, 2012)

   537     527     33.64     32.95  

January 2012

   539     509     34.08     31.44  

December 2011

   526     500     32.86     30.68  

November 2011

   547     497     35.58     30.69  

October 2011

   555     489     35.93     30.33  

September 2011

   511     468     32.74     29.61  

August 2011

   539     461     35.25     30.17  

February 2013 (through February 27, 2013)

   716     687     44.92     41.50  

January 2013

   692     641     43.96     41.01  

December 2012

   652     628     42.04     40.63  

November 2012

   645     603     41.28     38.32  

October 2012

   618     598     39.81     38.25  

September 2012

   608     592     39.34     37.41  

August 2012

   594     545     37.41     33.90  

REED ELSEVIER NV

The Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares are quoted on Euronext Amsterdam NV and the New York Stock Exchange. Euronext Amsterdam NV is the principal trading market for Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. Trading on the New York Stock Exchange is in the form of ADSs, evidenced by ADRs issued by The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary. Each ADS represents two Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing middle market quotations for the Reed Elsevier NV Ordinary Shares on Euronext Amsterdam NV as derived from theOfficiële Prijscourantof Euronext Amsterdam NV and the high and low last reported sales prices in US dollars for the Reed Elsevier NV ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange, as derived from the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, and reported by Thomson Reuters Datastream:

 

  € per ordinary share   US dollars per ADS       € per ordinary share           US dollars per ADS     

Calendar Periods

  High   Low   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low 

2012

   11.37     8.17     29.58     20.35  

2011

   10.27     7.59     27.84     21.23     10.27     7.59     27.84     21.23  

2010

   10.12     8.17     26.93     20.14     10.12     8.17     26.93     20.14  

2009

   9.42     7.19     25.05     19.85     9.42     7.19     25.05     19.85  

2008

   13.69     7.72     39.61     20.73     13.69     7.72     39.61     20.73  

2007

   14.89     11.49     40.49     33.20     14.89     11.49     40.49     33.20  

2006

   13.72     11.08     35.25     26.72  

2012

        

Fourth Quarter

   11.37     10.23     29.58     26.50  

Third Quarter

   10.66     9.14     27.49     22.20  

Second Quarter

   9.73     8.17     25.97     20.35  

First Quarter

   9.64     8.79     25.76     22.36  

2011

                

Fourth Quarter

   9.13     8.15     25.74     21.67     9.13     8.15     25.74     21.67  

Third Quarter

   9.42     7.59     27.16     21.23     9.42     7.59     27.16     21.23  

Second Quarter

   9.51     8.74     27.36     25.07     9.51     8.74     27.36     25.07  

First Quarter

   10.27     8.66     27.84     23.85     10.27     8.66     27.84     23.85  

2010

                

Fourth Quarter

   9.66     9.01     26.93     23.45     9.66     9.01     26.93     23.45  

Third Quarter

   10.12     8.92     26.64     22.19     10.12     8.92     26.64     22.19  

Second Quarter

   9.35     8.17     24.98     20.14     9.35     8.17     24.98     20.14  

First Quarter

   9.00     8.29     24.83     22.73     9.00     8.29     24.83     22.73  

2009

        

Fourth Quarter

   8.60     7.58     24.67     22.11  

Third Quarter

   8.42     7.19     23.94     20.23  

Second Quarter

   9.00     7.61     24.72     20.06  

First Quarter

   9.42     7.92     25.05     19.85  

Month

                

February 2012 (through February 15, 2012)

   9.17     8.94     24.11     23.33  

January 2012

   9.23     8.79     24.36     22.36  

December 2011

   9.01     8.53     23.42     21.98  

November 2011

   9.13     8.16     25.31     21.67  

October 2011

   9.04     8.15     25.74     21.74  

September 2011

   8.38     7.74     23.53     21.23  

August 2011

   8.98     7.59     25.72     21.57  

February 2013 (through February 27, 2013)

   11.75     11.18     32.07     28.97  

January 2013

   11.54     11.18     31.11     29.21  

December 2012

   11.37     10.90     29.58     28.60  

November 2012

   11.11     10.44     28.95     26.50  

October 2012

   10.60     10.23     27.57     26.54  

September 2012

   10.66     10.35     27.49     26.10  

August 2012

   10.39     9.59     26.10     23.37  

ITEM 10: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

REED ELSEVIER PLC (the “Company”)

At the Company’s Annual General Meeting held in April 2010, shareholders passed a special resolution to adopt new Articles of Association (the “Articles”) to reflect fully the implementation of the UK Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”).

A copy of the Company’s current Articles is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 25, 2010 — see “Item 19: Exhibits” on page S-3.pages S-3 and S-4.

The following is a summary of the current Articles. As a summary, it is not exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by reference to UK law and the Articles.

Company’s Objects

The Company’s objects are unrestricted.

Share Capital

As at December 31, 2011,2012 the company’s issued ordinary share capital comprised 1,250,913,5651,257,597,977 shares of 14 51/116p of which 48,247,323116p. At December 31, 2012 the total shares are held in treasury.treasury were 70,936,383. Of these 13,451,468 ordinary shares were held by the Reed Elsevier PLCGroup plc Employee Benefit Trust and 57,484,915 ordinary shares may bewere held in certificated or uncertificated form.treasury by the Company.

The Company by ordinary resolution and subject to the Act may:

 

 1.Allot shares up to a limit of 1/3 of the issued share capital, a further 1/3 of the issued share capital may be allotted but only in connection with a fully pre-emptive rights issue;

 

 2.Sub-divide all or part of the share capital into shares of a smaller nominal value than the existing shares; and

 

 3.Consolidate and divide all or part of the share capital into shares of a larger nominal value than the existing shares.

All shares created by increase of the Company’s share capital by consolidation, division or sub-division shall be subject to all the provisions of the Articles.

The Company by special resolution and subject to the Act may:

 

 1.Disapply shareholders pre-emption rights on new issue shares up to a limit of 5% of the issued share capital;

 

 2.BuybackBuy back its own shares up to a limit of 10% of the issued share capital; and

 

 2.3.Reduce its share capital.

Transfer of ordinary shares

A certificated shareholding may be transferred in the usual form or in any other form approved by the Board. The Board in its discretion may refuse to register the transfer of a certificated share unless the instrument of transfer:

 

 1.is stamped or certified and lodged, at the registered office or other place that the Board decide, accompanied by the relevant share certificate and any other evidence that the Board may reasonably require to prove a legitimate right to transfer;

 

 2.is in respect of only one class of shares;

 

 3.is in favour of not more than four transferees; and

 

 4.is not fully paid.

Where the Board refuses to register a transfer of certificated shares, it must notify the transferee of the refusal within two months after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged with the Company.

For those members holding uncertificated shares, such transfers must be conducted using a relevant system as defined in the UK Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.

Untraced shareholders

The Company is entitled to sell any of its ordinary shares if during the period of twelve years prior to the publication of any advertisement stating the intent to sell, the following is true:if;

 

 1.The Company has waited three months sinceduring the period of twelve years prior to the publication of any advertisement stating the advertisement;

2.Atintent to sell, at least three dividends have become payable on the shares which have remained uncashed; and

 

 3.2.Duringduring the period of three month periodmonths following the publication of any advertisement stating the intent to sell, the company has received no indication of the location, or existence of the member, or the person entitled personto the shares by way of transmission.

Dividend Rights

Subject to the provisions of the Act, the shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend no larger than the amount recommended by the Board. Interim dividends may also be payable if the Board deems that there is sufficient profit available for distribution. Except as otherwise provided by the rights attached to the shares, all dividends shall be declared and paid according to the amounts paid up on the shares on which the dividend is declared. No dividend payable in respect of a share shall bear interest against the Company, unless otherwise provided by the rights attached to the share.

Unclaimed dividends

Any dividend which remains unclaimed for 12 years from the date when it became due for payment shall, if the Board so resolves, be forfeited and cease to be owed by the Company to the shareholder. The Company may stop issuing dividend cheques or warrants:

 

 1.Where on at least two consecutive occasions dividend cheques/warrants are left uncashed or returned undelivered; or

 

 2.Where after one such occasion reasonable enquiries have failed to establish an updated address.

If the member goes ontoon to claim a dividend or warrant, the Company must recommence issuing dividendsdividend cheques and warrants.

Distribution of assets on winding up

In the event of the company being wound up, on the authority of a special resolution of the Company and subject to the UK Insolvency Act 1986 the liquidator may:

 

 1.Divide among the members the whole or any part of the assets of the Company.

 

 2.Value any assets and determine how the division should be made between the members or different classes of members.

 

 3.Place the whole or any part of the assets in trust for the benefit of the members and determine the scope and terms of these trusts.

A member cannot be compelled to accept an asset with an inherent liability.

Variation of rights

Subject to the Act, where the capital of the Company is divided into different classes of shares, the unique rights attached to the respective classes may be varied or cancelled:

 

 1.With the written consent of the holders of 75% in nominal value of the issued shares of the class (excluding any treasury shares held in that class); or

 

 2.By authority of a special resolution passed at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the class.

General meetings of shareholders

Subject to the Act, the company must hold a general meeting every year. The Board may convene a general meeting when necessary and must do so promptly upon requisition by the shareholders. The notice period for annual general meetings is 21 clear days and 14 days for other general meetings. Subject to the Act and the Articles, the notice shall be sent to every member at their registered address. If, on two consecutive occasions notices are sent to a members registered address and have been returned undelivered the member shall not be entitled to receive any subsequent notice.

Voting rights

On a poll, every shareholder present has one vote and every proxy duly appointed by a member has one vote. No member is entitled to vote on a partly paid share. The Board also has the discretion to prevent a member from voting in person or by proxy if they are in default of a duly served notice under section 793 of the Act, concerning a request for information about interest in the company’s shares.

Directors’ Interests

Subject to the provisions of the Act, where a DirectorsDirector declares an interest to the Board, the Board may authorise the matter proposed to it which would otherwise constitute a conflict of interest and place a director in breach of their statutory

duty. Such authorisation is effective where the director in question is not included in the quorum for the meeting and the matter was agreed without their vote, or would have been agreed to had their vote not been counted. A director’s duty to declare an interest does not apply in the circumstances provided for by section 177(5) and 177(6) of the Act. A director:

 

 1.May be a party to, or otherwise interested in, any transaction or arrangement with the Company or in which the Company is otherwise (directly or interested in);

 

 2.May act solely or with his firm in a professional capacity (not as auditor) for the Company and shall be entitled to remuneration for his professional services, notwithstanding his position as director; and

 

 3.May be interested in a body corporate in which the Company is directly or indirectly interested or where the relationship between the director and the body corporate is at the request or direction of the Company.

A director with a declared interest that has been authorised by the Board, is not liable to account to the Company or its shareholders for any benefits received.

Directors’ Remuneration

The remuneration of any executive director shall be determined by the Board. It may include (without limitation) admission to or continuance of membership of any scheme (including share acquisition schemes), life assurance, pension provision or other such benefits payable to the director on or after retirement, or to his dependants on or after death.

For directors who do not hold an executive position in the company, their remuneration shall not exceed in aggregate £500,000 per annum or such higher amount as the Company may determine by ordinary resolution from time to time. Each director shall be paid a fee for their services which areis deemed to accrue from day to day at such rate as determined by the Board.

The directors may grant extra remuneration to any director who does not hold executive office but sits on any committee of the Board, or performs any other special services at the request of the Company. This extra remuneration may be paid in addition to, or in substitution for the ordinary remuneration.

Directors’ appointment/retirement/removal

The Board may appoint a person willing to act as director, either to fill a vacancy or as an additional director, provided the upper limit set by the Articles is not exceeded. The Company may by ordinary resolution remove any director from office, no special notice need be given and no director proposed for removal under the Articles has a right of protest against such removal.

Borrowing powers

Subject to the Act, the Board may exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money, guarantee, indemnify, mortgage or charge its undertaking, property, assets (present and future) and uncalled capital and to issue debentures and other securities whether outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any third party. Without the authority of an ordinary resolution the directors are prohibited from borrowing an amount equal to the higher of (i) eight thousand million pounds; and (ii) two and a half times the adjusted total of capital and reserves.

Indemnity

Subject to the Act, without bar to any other existing indemnity entitlements, the Company may use its assets to indemnify a director against liability incurred through negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to Company affairs.

REED ELSEVIER NV (the “Company”)

The following is a summary of the principal provisions of the Company’s articles of association (the “Articles”). As a summary, it is not exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Dutch law and the Articles as they read in the Dutch language. The Articles were last amended before a civil law notary in Amsterdam on March 3, 2010 after a shareholders’ resolution was passed to approve such amendment at the extraordinary general shareholders’ meetingExtraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on January 13, 2010. A copy of the current Articles is incorporated by reference from the 20112009 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 12, 201218, 2010 — see “Item 19: Exhibits” on page S-3.pages S-3 and S-4.

Share Capital

Reed Elsevier NV has two types of shares: ordinary shares of 0.07 euro nominal value and R shares of 0.70 euro nominal value. At the General Shareholders’ Meeting, each ordinary share is entitled to cast one vote. Each R share is convertible into

10 ordinary shares and is entitled to cast ten (10) votes. Otherwise it has the same rights as an ordinary share, except that Reed Elsevier may pay a lower dividend on an R share, but not less than 1% of the nominal value of an R share. The ordinary shares are listed at NYSE Euronext Amsterdam and at NYSE New York.

As at December 31, 20112012 the company’sCompany’s issued share capital comprised 724,077,755725,984,225 ordinary shares of which 31,333,697 shares are held in treasury and 4,303,179 R shares are held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC. At December 31, 2012 the total shares held in treasury were 44,226,598. Of these 6,990,101 ordinary shares were held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust and 36,613,087 ordinary shares and 62,341 R shares (equivalent to 623,410 ordinary shares) were held in treasury by the Company.

Ordinary shares can be registered in a shareholder’s name or held via a book-entry deposit under the Dutch Giro Securities Trade Act.

Issuance of shares

Shares may be issued on the basis of a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders, which can designate this authority to the Combined Board, provided that the aggregate nominal value of this designated authority cannot exceed one-third of the sum of (i) the Company’s issued share capital at the time the resolution to make the designation is adopted and (ii) the aggregate nominal value of any rights granted by the Company to take up shares outstanding at that time.

Pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders may be restricted or excluded by a resolution of the general meeting and in the event of an issue of shares pursuant to a resolution of the Combined Board, the pre-emptive rights can be restricted or excluded pursuant to a resolution of the Combined Board if that board is designated competent to do so by the general meeting.

Acquisition of the Company’s own shares

The Company is entitled to acquire its own fully paid-up shares or depositary receipts thereof, provided that either the acquisition is for no consideration or that:

 

 (a)the Company’s equity after the deduction of the acquisition price, is not less than the sum of the paid-up and called-up part of the issued share capital and the reserves which must be maintained by virtue of the law; and

 

 (b)the nominal value of the shares or depositary receipts thereof, which the Company acquires, holds, holds in pledge or which are held by a Subsidiary, does not exceed one-tenth of the Company’s issued share capital. An acquisition of the Company’s own shares other than for no consideration is only permitted if the general meeting has granted authorisation to the Executive Board. No voting rights may be exercised on shares held by the company or a subsidiary and no dividend shall be paid on these shares.

The general meeting of shareholders may at the proposal of the Combined Board resolve to reduce the Company’s issued share capital through cancellation of shares or through reduction of the nominal value of shares by amendment of the Articles of Association, provided that the issued share capital or the paid-up part thereof will not drop below the amount prescribed by the Dutch Civil Code.

Transfer of shares

The transfer of a share shall require an instrument intended for such purpose and the written acknowledgement by the Company of the transfer. The transfer of the rights of a Euroclear-participant with respect to ordinary shares which are included in the securities depositary system of Euroclear Nederland shall be effected in accordance with the provisions of the Dutch Giro Securities Trade Act (Wet giraal effectenverkeer).

Dividend Rights

Each year the Combined Board shall determine which part of the profits shown in the adopted profit and loss account shall be reserved. After allocation to reserves, the shareholders’ meeting shall determine the allocation of remaining profits.

Distributions may be made only insofar as the Company’s equity exceeds the amount of the paid in and called up part of the issued share capital, increased by the reserves which must be kept by virtue of the law. Dividends shall be paid after adoption of the annual accounts showing that payment of dividends is permitted. Interim distributions may be payable, provided there is sufficient profit available for distribution in accordance with the aforementioned requirements as shown by interim accounts.

The Boards

Reed Elsevier NV has a two-tier board system, comprising an Executive Board and a Supervisory Board. The members of the Executive Board and the members of the Supervisory Board together form the Combined Board. It is established board practice at Reed Elsevier NV that the members of both boards meet together as the Combined Board.

Executive Board

The Executive Board is entrusted with the management of the company. The Executive Board functions as a collective body with shared responsibility. The number of members of the Executive Board is determined by the Combined Board, but shall at all times be less than the number of members of the Supervisory Board. Members of the Executive Board shall be appointed by the general shareholders’ meetingGeneral Shareholders’ Meeting on the basis of a proposal of the Combined Board. Under the Articles, members of the Executive Board are appointed for a three-year term, with the possibility of reappointment. Notwithstanding these provisions in the articles of association and in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code, all members of the Executive Board seek annual reappointment at the annual general meetingAnnual General Meeting to align the arrangements regarding appointment for the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC.

Supervisory Board

The duties of the Supervisory Board are to supervise the management of the Executive Board, to supervise the policies of the Executive Board and the general affairs in the Company and the business connected with it, and to assist the Executive Board by providing advice.

The number of members of the Supervisory Board is determined by the Combined Board. The number of members of the Supervisory Board must always exceed the number of members of the Executive Board.

Members of the Supervisory Board shall be appointed by the general shareholders’ meetingGeneral Shareholders’ Meeting on proposal of the Combined Board. Under the Articles, members of the Supervisory Board are appointed for a three-year term, with the possibility of re-appointment and shall retire periodically in accordance with a rotation plan drawn up by the Combined Board. They shall retire no later than three years after appointment. As a general rule, members of the Supervisory Board serve for two three year terms. Individual directors may serve up to one additional three-year term. Notwithstanding these provisions in the articles of association and in accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code, all members of the Supervisory Board seek annual reappointment at the annual general meetingAnnual General Meeting to align the arrangements regarding appointment for the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC. Annual reappointment will not affect the term of their three year appointment.

Suspension/dismissal

Each member of the Executive Board and/or the Supervisory Board can at any time be suspended or dismissed by the General Shareholders’ Meeting. In addition, each member of the Executive Board can at any time be suspended by the Supervisory Board.

Amendment of the Articles

Amendment of the Articles requires a shareholders’ resolution passed with an absolute majority of the votes cast, provided such resolution is passed at the proposal of the Combined Board. Otherwise, a majority of two-thirds of the votes cast is required in a meeting at which at least half of the Company’s issued capital is represented. The notice for such a meeting must state that amendment of the Articles is on the agenda. A copy of the full text of the proposed amendment of the Articles must be made available free of charge to shareholders at the time of notice for the meeting. In accordance with Article 44 of the Articles, only certain provisions in the Articles including provisions governing appointments and dismissals of members of the Executive and Supervisory Boards can be amended upon a proposal of the Combined Board.

The Combined Board of Reed Elsevier NV has resolved to take the necessary steps to establish a one-tier governance structure at Reed Elsevier NV. For this purpose the Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV will have to be amended and a proposal for the one-tier governance structure will be put to the Annual General Meeting on April 24, 2013.

General meetings of shareholders

At least once a year, a general shareholders’ meetingGeneral Shareholders’ Meeting is held. Notices of a general meeting are posted on the Reed Elsevier website and are made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law. This means that the meeting is called at no less than 42 calendar days notice by an announcement on the Reed Elsevier website. The agenda and explanatory notes for the general shareholders’ meetingGeneral Shareholders’ Meeting are published in advance on the website and are available at the listing agent and at the offices of Reed Elsevier NV from the day of the notice.

The Articles provide for a record date and this has been used at the recent General Shareholders’ meetings.Meetings. In accordance with Dutch law, the record date will be the 28th day before the date of the general shareholders’ meetingGeneral Shareholders’ Meeting and the holder of shares as per the record date will be entitled to vote, irrespective of any transfer of such shares between the record date and the date of the general shareholders’ meeting.

The annual general shareholders’ meetingAnnual General Shareholders’ Meeting discusses the annual report, adopts the annual accounts, resolves on a proposal to pay a dividend and votes on release of the members of the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board from liability as separate agenda items in the annual general shareholders’ meeting.

Conflict of Interest - members of the Boards

The handling of any (apparent) conflict of interest between a member of the Executive Board or a member of the Supervisory Board and the company is governed by the Articles and the Rules for the Boards of Reed Elsevier NV.

Remuneration

The remuneration policy for members of the Executive and the Supervisory Boards is adopted by the general shareholders’ meeting.General Shareholders’ Meeting. The remuneration of the members of the Executive Board is determined by the Supervisory Board in line with the remuneration policy agreed by the shareholders’ meeting. The remuneration of members of the Supervisory Board is determined by the Combined Board, in line with the remuneration policy for non-executive directors. The maximum amount of annual remuneration shall be determined by the shareholders’ meeting and can only be adopted at the proposal of the Combined Board. At the annual general meetingAnnual General Meeting in 2011 the maximum amount of remuneration for the Supervisory Board was set at €600,000 per annum, for the proportion of the fees borne by the Company.

Dissolution of the Company

A resolution to dissolve the Company requires an absolute majority of the votes cast at the general meetingGeneral Meeting of shareholders.Shareholders. The notice for such a meeting must state that dissolution will be on the agenda. If the Company is dissolved by a resolution of the general meeting, the members of the Executive Board shall be charged with the liquidation of the Company and the Supervisory Board with the supervision thereof, subject to the relevant provisions of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.

Assets which remain after payment of the debts shall be transferred to the holders of ordinary shares and the holders of class R shares in proportion to the nominal value of their shareholdings.

Indemnity

Under the Articles, to the extent permissible by law, the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each sitting and former member of the Executive Board and of the Supervisory Board against the financial consequences of any liabilities or claims, brought by any party other than the Company itself or its group companies, in relation to acts or omissions performed or committed in that person’s capacity of member of the Executive Board or of the Supervisory Board.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Reed Elsevier has not entered into any material contract within the last two years.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

There is currently no UK or Dutch legislation restricting the import or export of capital or affecting the remittance of dividends or other payments to holders of, respectively, Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares who are non-residents of the United Kingdom and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares who are non-residents of the Netherlands.

There are no limitations relating only to non-residents of the United Kingdom under UK law or Reed Elsevier PLC’s Memorandum and Articles of Association on the right to be a holder of, and to vote, Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares, or to non-residents of the Netherlands under Dutch law or Reed Elsevier NV’s Articles of Association on the right to be a holder of, and to vote, Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.

TAXATION

The following discussion is a summary under present law and tax authority practice of the material UK, Dutch and US federal income tax considerations relevant to the purchase, ownership and disposal of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares or ADSs and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares or ADSs. This discussion applies to you only if you are a US holder, you hold your ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets and you use the US dollar as your functional currency. It does not address the

tax treatment of US holders subject to special rules, such as banks, dealers or traders in securities or currencies, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, partnerships or other pass-through entities for US federal income tax purposes, holders of 10% or more of Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV voting shares, persons holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, straddle, conversion or constructive sale transaction, persons that are resident, ordinarily resident or domiciled in the

UK (or who have ceased to be resident or ordinarily resident within the past five years of assessment) and persons that are resident in the Netherlands. The summary also does not discuss the US federal alternative minimum tax or the tax laws of particular states or localities in the US.

This summary does not consider your particular circumstances. It is not a substitute for tax advice.We urge you to consult your own independent tax advisors about the income, capital gains and/or transfer tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances of purchasing, holding and disposing of ordinary shares or ADSs.

As used in this discussion, “US holder” means a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs that is for US federal income tax purposes: (i) an individual US citizen or resident, (ii) a corporation, partnership or other business entity created or organised under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) a trust (a) that is subject to the control of one or more US persons and the primary supervision of a US court or (b) that has a valid election in effect under US Treasury regulations to be treated as a US person or (iv) an estate the income of which is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source.

UK Taxation

Dividends

Under current UK taxation legislation, no tax is required to be withheld at source from dividends paid on the Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares or ADSs.

Capital Gains

You may be liable for UK taxation on capital gains realised on the disposal of your Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares or ADSs if at the time of the disposal you carry on a trade, profession or vocation in the United Kingdom through a branch or agency, or in the case of a company a permanent establishment, and such ordinary shares or ADSs are or have been used, held or acquired for the purposes of such trade, profession, vocation, branch, agency or permanent establishment.

UK Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax

Under currentCurrent UK law (subject to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) case mentioned below),includes provision whereby UK stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) or UK stamp duty is payable upon the transfer or issue of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares to the depositary in exchange for Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs evidenced by ADRs. For this purpose, the current rate of stamp duty and SDRT ofis 1.5% would be, applied, in each case, to: (i) the issue price when the ordinary shares are issued; (ii) the amount or value of the consideration where shares are transferred for consideration in money or money’s worth; or (iii) the value of the ordinary shares in any other case. Following a decision in October 2009 of the ECJ in the case ofHSBC Holdings plc v HMRClitigation HMRC have confirmedaccepted that they will no longer seek to apply the 1.5% SDRT charge on thean issue of shares into a clearance service or depositary receipt system withinon the European Union to which a 1.5%basis that the charge would have previously applied. However it is not clear to what extentcompatible with EU law. Accordingly no UK SDRT or UK stamp duty is payable upon theHSBCdecision impacts on the lawfulness issue of the 1.5% charge on issuing or transferring shares into a depositary receipt service or a clearance service outside the European Union (or transferring existingReed Elsevier PLC shares to a clearance service orthe depositary receipt system wherever located). These matters are the subject or ongoing litigation and it is possible that the rules regarding the 1.5% charge may be contrary to European Union law or may change in the future. Accordingly specific professional advice should be sought before paying the 1.5 percent charge.exchange for Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs evidenced by ADRs.

Provided that the relevant instrument of transfer is not executed in the UK and remains outside the UK, no UK stamp duty will be payable on the acquisition or subsequent transfer of Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs. Under current law, an agreement to transfer Reed Elsevier PLC ADSs will not give rise to a liability to SDRT.

A transfer of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares by the depositary to an ADS holder where there is no transfer of beneficial ownership will not be chargeable to UK stamp duty or SDRT.

Purchases of Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares, as opposed to ADSs, will generally give rise to UK stamp duty or SDRT at the time of transfer or agreement to transfer, normally at the rate of 0.5% of the amount payable for the ordinary shares. SDRT and UK stamp duty are usually paid by the purchaser. If the ordinary shares are later transferred to the depositary, additional UK stamp duty or SDRT may be payable as described above.

Dutch Taxation

Withholding tax

Dividends distributed to you by Reed Elsevier NV are normally subject to a withholding tax imposed by the Netherlands at a rate of 15%, which rate equals the rate of tax that the Netherlands is generally allowed to levy under the US-Netherlands income tax treaty. As a consequence, no administrative procedures for a partial relief at source from or a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax need be complied with in respect of dividend distributions by Reed Elsevier NV. Dividends include, among other things, stock dividends unless the dividend is distributed out of recognised paid-in share premium for Dutch tax purposes.

Taxation of dividends and capital gains

You will not be subject to any Dutch taxes on dividends distributed by Reed Elsevier NV (other than the withholding tax described above) or any capital gain realised on the disposal of Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares or ADSs provided that (i) the Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares or ADSs are not attributable to an enterprise or an interest in an enterprise that you carry on, in whole or part through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in the Netherlands, (ii) you do not have a substantial interest or a deemed substantial interest in Reed Elsevier NV (generally, 5% or more of either the total issued and outstanding capital or the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares) or, if you have such an interest, you do not hold such interest with the avoidance of Netherlands (or foreign) (withholding) tax as (one of) the main purpose(s) or it forms part of the assets of an enterprise, and (iii) if you are an individual, such dividend or capital gain from your Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares or ADSs does not form benefits from miscellaneous activities(“resultaat uit overige werkzaamheden”) in the Netherlands. Benefits from miscellaneous activities in the Netherlands include income and gains derived from the holding, whether directly or indirectly, of (a combination of) shares, debt claims or other rights (together, a “lucrative interest”) that the holder thereof has acquired under such circumstances that such income and gains are intended to be remuneration for work or services performed by such holder (or a related person) in the Netherlands, whether within or outside an employment relation, where such lucrative interest provides the holder thereof, economically speaking, with certain benefits that have a relation to the relevant work or services.

US Federal Income Taxation

Holders of the ADSs generally will be treated for US federal income tax purposes as owners of the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs. Accordingly, deposits of ordinary shares for ADSs and withdrawals of shares for ADSs will not be subject to US federal income tax.

Dividends

Dividends on Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares or ADSs or Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares or ADSs (including any Dutch tax withheld) will generally be included in your gross income as ordinary income from foreign sources. The dollar amount recognised on receiving a dividend in pounds sterling or euros will be based on the exchange rate in effect on the date the depositary receives the dividend, or in the case of ordinary shares on the date you receive the dividend, as the case may be, whether or not the payment is converted into US dollars at that time. Any gain or loss recognised on a subsequent conversion of pounds sterling or euros for a different amount will be US source ordinary income or loss. Dividends received will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction available to corporations.

With respect to US holders who are individuals, certain dividends received before January 1, 2013 from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of certain comprehensive income tax treaties with the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that the United Kingdom is a country with which the United States has a treaty in force that meets these requirements, and Reed Elsevier PLC believes it is eligible for the benefits of this treaty. Additionally, the same guidance indicates that the Netherlands is also a country with which the United States has a treaty in force that meets the above requirements, and Reed Elsevier NV believes it is eligible for the benefits of this treaty. Individuals that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. US holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, foreign withholding taxes on dividends withheld at the appropriate rate may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your US federal income tax liability. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on the ordinary shares or ADSs will be treated as income from sources outside the US and

will generally constitute passive category income. Further, in certain circumstances, if you have held the ordinary shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss, or are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on the dividends on the ordinary shares or ADSs. Individuals that treat a dividend as qualified dividend income may take into account for foreign tax credit limitation purposes only the portion of the dividend effectively taxed at the highest applicable marginal rate. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.

Dispositions

You will recognise a gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs in an amount equal to the difference between your basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and the amount realised. The gain or loss generally will be

capital gain or loss. It will be long term capital gain or loss if you have held the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than one year at the time of sale or other disposition. Long term capital gains of individuals are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to limitations. Any gain or loss you recognise generally will be treated as income from US sources for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

If you receive pounds sterling or euros on the sale or other disposition of your ordinary shares or ADSs, you will realise an amount equal to the US dollar value of the pounds sterling or euros on the date of sale or other disposition (or in the case of cash basis and electing accrual basis taxpayers, if the ordinary shares or ADSs are traded on an established securities market, the settlement date for the sale or other disposition). You will have a tax basis in the pounds sterling or the euros that you receive equal to the US dollar amount received on the settlement date. Any gain or loss realised by a US holder between the sale date and the settlement date or on a subsequent conversion of pounds sterling or euros into US dollars will be US source ordinary income or loss.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax

Dividends from ordinary shares or ADSs and proceeds from the sale of the ordinary shares or ADSs may be reported to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) unless the shareholder is a corporation or other exempt recipient. A backup withholding tax may apply to such amounts unless the shareholder (i) is a corporation, (ii) provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules, or (iii) otherwise establishes a basis for exemption. The amount of any backup withholding tax will be allowed as a credit against the holder’s US federal income tax liability and may entitle the holder to a refund, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Recently enacted legislation requires certain US holders to report to the IRS information about their investment in ordinary shares or ADSs not held through an account with a domestic financial institution. Investors who fail to report required information are subject to substantial penalties. Investors should consult with their own tax advisers about the effect of this legislation on their investment in the ordinary shares or ADSs.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

You may read and copy documents referred to in this annual report that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2521. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges.

ITEM 11: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

Reed Elsevier’s primary market risks are to changes in interest rates and exchange rates as well as liquidity and credit risk.

Net finance costs are exposed to interest rate fluctuations on borrowings, cash and cash equivalents. Upward fluctuations in interest rates increase the interest cost of floating rate borrowings whereas downward fluctuations in interest rates decrease the interest return on floating rate cash and cash equivalents. Interest expense payable on fixed rate borrowings is protected against upward fluctuations in interest rates but does not benefit from downward fluctuations. Reed Elsevier companies engage in foreign currency denominated transactions and are therefore subject to exchange rate risk on such transactions. Net finance costs are also exposed to changes in the fair value of derivatives (as a result of interest and exchange rate fluctuations) which are not part of a designated hedging relationship under IAS39 — Financial Instruments, and to ineffectiveness that may arise on designated hedging relationships. Reed Elsevier’s management of this interest rate risk and foreign exchange rate risk is described below.

Reed Elsevier manages a portfolio of long term debt, short term debt and committed bank facilities to support its capital structure and is exposed to the risk that relevant markets are closed and debt cannot be refinanced on a timely basis. In addition, the credit spread at which Reed Elsevier borrows is exposed to changes in market liquidity and investor demand. Reed Elsevier manages this risk by maintaining a range of borrowing facilities and debt programmes with a maturity profile to facilitate refinancing.

Reed Elsevier has a credit exposure for the full principal amount of cash and cash equivalents held with individual counterparties. In addition, it has a credit risk from the potential non performance by counterparties to financial instruments; this credit risk normally being restricted to the amounts of any hedge gain and not the full principal amount being hedged. Credit risks are managed by monitoring the credit quality of counterparties and restricting the amounts outstanding with each of them.

Reed Elsevier’s management of the above market risks is described in further detail on pages 3534 to 3837 of Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects: Liquidity and Capital Resources — Reed Elsevier.

Management of Interest Rate Risk and Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

Reed Elsevier seeks to limit its risk to interest and exchange rates by means of derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, interest rate options, forward rate agreements and forward foreign exchange contracts. Reed Elsevier only enters into derivative financial instruments to hedge (or reduce) the underlying risks described above.

Reed Elsevier enters into interest rate swaps in order to achieve an appropriate balance between fixed and variable rate borrowings, cash and cash equivalents. They are used to hedge the effects of fluctuating interest rates on variable rate borrowings, cash and cash equivalents by allowing Reed Elsevier to fix the interest rate on a notional principal amount equal to the principal amount of the underlying floating rate cash, cash equivalents or borrowings being hedged. They are also used to swap fixed interest rates payable on long term borrowings for a variable rate. Such swaps may be used to swap a whole fixed rate bond for variable rate or they may be used to swap a portion of the period or a portion of the principal amount for the variable rate.

Forward swaps and forward rate agreements are entered into to hedge interest rate exposures known to arise at a future date. These exposures may include new borrowings or cash deposits to be entered into at a future date or future rollovers of existing borrowings or cash deposits. Interest exposure arises on future, new and rollover borrowings and cash deposits because interest rates can fluctuate between the time a decision is made to enter into such transactions and the time those transactions are actually entered into. The purpose of forward swaps and forward rate agreements is to fix the interest cost on future borrowings or interest return on cash investments at the time it is known such a transaction will be entered into. The fixed interest rate, the floating rate index (if applicable) and the time period covered by forward swaps and forward rate agreements are known at the time the agreements are entered into. The use of forward swaps and forward rate agreements is limited to hedging activities; consequently no trading position results from their use. The hedging effect of forward swaps and forward rate agreements is the same as interest rate swaps. Similarly, Reed Elsevier utilises forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the effects of exchange rate movements on its foreign currency revenue and operating costs.

Interest rate options protect against fluctuating interest rates by enabling Reed Elsevier to fix the interest rate on a notional principal amount of borrowings or cash deposits (in a similar manner to interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements) whilst at the same time allowing Reed Elsevier to improve the fixed rate if the market moves in a certain way. Reed Elsevier uses interest rate options from time to time when it expects interest rates to move in its favour but it is deemed imprudent to leave the interest rate risk completely unhedged. In such cases, Reed Elsevier may use an option to lock in at certain rates whilst at the same time maintaining some freedom to benefit if rates move in its favour.

Where net finance costs are exposed to changes in the fair value of derivatives (as a result of interest and exchange rate fluctuations), Reed Elsevier manages this risk by designating derivatives in a highly effective hedging relationship unless the potential change in their fair value is deemed to be insignificant.

Derivative financial instruments are utilised to hedge (or reduce) the risks of interest rate or exchange rate movements and are not entered into unless such risks exist. Derivatives utilised, while appropriate for hedging a particular kind of risk, are not considered specialised or high-risk and are generally available from numerous sources.

Sensitivity Analysis

The following analysis sets out the sensitivity of the fair value of Reed Elsevier’s financial instruments to selected changes in interest rates and exchange rates. The range of changes represents Reed Elsevier’s view of the changes that are reasonably possible over a one year period.

The fair values of interest rate swaps, interest rate options, forward rate agreements and forward foreign exchange contracts set out below represent the replacement costs calculated using market rates of interest and exchange at December 31, 2011.2012. The fair value of long term borrowings has been calculated by discounting expected future cash flows at market rates.

Reed Elsevier’s use of financial instruments and its accounting policies for financial instruments are described more fully in notes 2 and 19 to the combined financial statements.

(a) Interest Rate Risk

The following sensitivity analysis assumes an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates for all currencies and maturities from their levels at December 31, 20112012 with all other variables held constant.

 

Financial Instrument

 Fair Value
December 31,
2011
  Fair Value Change Fair Value
December 31,
2010
  Fair Value Change  Fair Value
December 31,
2012
  Fair Value Change Fair Value
December 31,
2011
  Fair Value Change 
 +100
basis points
 -100
basis points
 +100
basis points
 -100
basis points
   +100
basis points
 -100
basis points
 +100
basis points
 -100
basis points
 
 (In millions)     (In millions)      (In millions)     (In millions)     

Short term borrowings

 £(596 £    —   £    —   £(379 £   £   £(131 £   £ —   £(596 £   £  

Long term borrowings (including current portion)

  (4,093  171    (175  (4,381  188    (198  (4,231  190    (187  (4,093  171    (175

Interest rate swaps (swapping fixed rate debt to floating)

  123    (28  23    105    (37  38    127    (47  49    123    (28  23  

Interest rate swaps (swapping floating rate debt to fixed)

  (10  4    (3  (25  9    (8  (2  2    (1  (10  4    (3

A 100 basis point change in interest rates would not result in a material change to the fair value of other financial instruments.

At December 31, 2011, 69%2012, 59% of gross borrowings are either fixed rate or have been fixed through the use of interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements and options. A 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would result in an estimated decrease in net finance costs of £5£8 million (2010: £3(2011: £5 million), based on the composition of financial instruments including cash, cash equivalents, bank loans and commercial paper borrowings at December 31, 2011.2012. A 100 basis points rise in interest rates would result in an estimated increase in net finance costs of £5£8 million (2010: £3(2011: £5 million).

(b) Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

The following sensitivity analysis assumes an immediate 10% change in all foreign currency exchange rates against sterling from their levels at December 31, 20112012 with all other variables held constant. A +10% change indicates a strengthening of the currency against sterling and a -10% change indicates a weakening of the currency against sterling.

 

Financial Instrument

 Fair Value
December 31,
2011
  Fair Value Change Fair Value
December 31,

2010
  Fair Value Change  Fair Value
December 31,
2012
  Fair Value Change Fair Value
December 31,
2011
  Fair Value Change 
 +10% -10% +10% -10%   +10% -10% +10% -10% 
 (In millions)     (In millions)       (In millions)      (In millions)    

Cash and cash equivalents

 £726   £61   £(51 £742   £64   £(53 £641   £23   £(23 £726   £56   £(56

Short term borrowings

  (596  (66  54    (379  (42  34    (131  (13  13    (596  (60  60  

Long term borrowings (including current portion)

  (4,093  (366  300    (4,381  (399  327    (4,231  (339  339    (4,093  (330  330  

Interest rate swaps (including cross currency interest rate swaps)

  128    11    (9  94    10    (8  138    10    (10  128    10    (10

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  (48  (57  57    (40  (55  55    46    (58  58    (48  (57  57  

A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates would not result in a material change to the fair value of other financial instruments.

ITEM 12: DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Fees and charges for American Depositary Receipt (ADR) holders

The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary for the Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV American Depositary Receipt programs, collects its fees for delivery and surrender of American DepositoryDepositary Shares (ADSs) directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

 

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay

  

For

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

  Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property (in certain circumstances volume discounts may be available)
  Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

$0.02 (or less) per ADS

  Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs  

Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositorydepositary to ADS

registered holders

$0.02 (or less) per ADS per calendar year

  Depositary services

Registration or transfer fees

  

Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you

deposit or withdraw shares

Expenses of the depositary

  Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)
  Converting foreign currency to US dollars
Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes  As necessary
Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities  As necessary

Fees and other payments made by the depositary to Reed Elsevier

In consideration of acting as depositary, Bank of New York Mellon has agreed to make certain reimbursements and payments to Reed Elsevier on an annual basis for expenses related to the administration and maintenance of the ADR programs including, but not limited to, New York Stock Exchange listing fees, investor relations expenses, or any other program related expenses. The depositary has also agreed to pay the standard out-of-pocket administrative, maintenance and shareholder services expenses for providing services to the registered DR holders. It has also agreed with Reed Elsevier to waive certain standard fees associated with promotional services, program visibility campaigns and program analytic reporting. In certain instances, the depositary has agreed to provide additional annual reimbursements and payments to Reed Elsevier based on any applicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse Reed Elsevier, but the amount of reimbursement available to Reed Elsevier is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors.

From January 1, 20112012 to February 15, 2012,27, 2013, Reed Elsevier received a reimbursement of $225,000, net of withheld taxes, from the depositary for New York Stock Exchange listing fees, investor relations expenses and other program related expenses, in connection with the ADR facility.

PART II

ITEM 15: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV are required to comply with applicable US regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, insofar as they apply to foreign private issuers. Accordingly, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have established a Disclosure Committee comprising the company secretaries of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV and other senior Reed Elsevier managers appointed by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. The committee has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011.2012. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a — 15(f) and 15d — 15(f) under the Exchange Act, as amended. Reed Elsevier’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of Reed Elsevier’s financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Reed Elsevier management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the internal controls over financial reporting of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV were effective as of December 31, 2011.2012.

Certifications by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are submitted as exhibits to this Form 20-F (see “Item 19: Exhibits” on page S-3)pages S-3 and S-4).

Deloitte LLP and Deloitte Accountants BV have audited the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112012 and have audited the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, theirreporting. Their report in respect of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses areis included herein. Deloitte LLP have audited the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC and Deloitte Accountants BV have audited the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV. respectivelyNV for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and they2012. They have also audited the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,reporting; their reports in respect of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, respectively, are included herein.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and members of Reed Elsevier PLC and to the members of the Supervisory and Executive Boards and the shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of the combined businesses which compriseof Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures (together the “Combined Businesses”), as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The management of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV are responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined businessesCombined Businesses’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the combined businessesCombined Businesses maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the combined statement of financial position and the related combined income statement and the statementcombined statements of comprehensive income, cash flows comprehensive income and changes in equity as ofat and for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of the combined businessesCombined Businesses and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

/s/ DELOITTE LLP

London, United Kingdom

February 15, 201227, 2013

 

/s/ DELOITTE ACCOUNTANTS B.V.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

February 15, 201227, 2013

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and members of Reed Elsevier PLC:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries (“the Company”(the “Company”) as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management of the Company areis responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated businessesCompany maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternalControlIntegratedFrameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated income statement and the statementstatements of comprehensive income, cash flows comprehensive income and changes in equity as ofat and for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of the Company and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

/s/ DELOITTE LLP
London, United Kingdom
February 15, 201227, 2013

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the members of the Supervisory and Executive Boards and the shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Reed Elsevier NV (“the Company”and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on criteria established inInternalControlIntegratedFrameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management of the Company areis responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated businessesCompany maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternalControlIntegratedFrameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated income statement and the statementstatements of comprehensive income, cash flows comprehensive income, and changes in equity as ofat and for the year ended December 31, 20112012 of the Company and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

/s/ DELOITTE ACCOUNTANTS B.V.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
February 15, 201227, 2013

Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, have reviewed whether or not during the period covered by the annual report, there have been any changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting. Based on that review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have concluded that there have been no such changes.

An outline of the internal control structure is set out below.

Parent companies

The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV exercise independent supervisory roles over the activities and systems of internal control of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have each adopted a schedule of matters which are required to be brought to them for decision. In relation to Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, the Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV approve the strategy and the annual budgets, and receive regular reports on the operations, including the treasury and risk management activities of the two companies. Major transactions proposed by the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV require the approval of the Boards of both Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV.

The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV Audit Committees meet on a regular basis to review the systems of internal control and risk management of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV.

Operating companies

The Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc is responsible for the system of internal control of the Reed Elsevier publishing and information businesses, while the Boards of Elsevier Reed Finance BV are responsible for the system of internal control in respect of the finance activities. The Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV are also responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of their system of internal control.

The Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV have each implemented an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating, monitoring and managing the more significant risks faced by their respective businesses. This process has been in place throughout the year ended December 31, 20112012 and up to the date of the approvals of this annual report.

Reed Elsevier Group plc

Reed Elsevier Group plc has an established framework of procedures and internal controls, with which the management of each business is required to comply. Group businesses are required to maintain systems of internal control which are appropriate to the nature and scale of their activities and address all significant operational and financial risks that they face. The Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc has adopted a schedule of matters that are required to be brought to it for decision.

Reed Elsevier Group plc has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that provides a guide for achieving its business goals and requires officers and employees to behave in an open, honest, ethical and principled manner. The code also outlines confidential procedures enabling employees to report any concerns about compliance, or about Reed Elsevier’s financial reporting practice. The code is published on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Each division has identified and evaluated its major risks, the controls in place to manage those risks and the level of residual risk accepted. Risk management and control procedures are embedded into the operations of the business and include the monitoring of progress in areas for improvement that come to management and board attention. The major risks identified include business continuity, protection of IT systems and data, challenges to intellectual property rights, management of strategic and operational change, evaluation and integration of acquisitions, and recruitment and retention of personnel. Further detail on the principal risks facing Reed Elsevier is set out on pages 7 to 10.

The major strategic risks facing the Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses are considered by the Board. Reed Elsevier’s Chief Risk Officer has the responsibility to provide regular reports to the Board and Audit Committee. Working closely with business management and with the central functions, the role of the Chief Risk Officer is to ensure that Reed Elsevier is managing its business risks effectively and in a coordinated manner across the business with clarity on the respective responsibilities and interdependencies. Litigation and other legal and regulatory matters are managed by legal directors in Europe and the United States.

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Audit Committee receives regular reports on the management of material risks and reviews these reports. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from both internal and external auditors on internal control

and risk management matters. In addition, each division is required, at the end of the financial year, to review the

effectiveness of internal controls and risk management and report its findings on a detailed basis to the management of Reed Elsevier Group plc. These reports are summarised and, as part of the annual review of effectiveness, submitted to the Audit Committee of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Chairman of the Audit Committee reports to the board on any significant internal control matters arising.

Elsevier Reed Finance BV

Elsevier Reed Finance BV has established policy guidelines, which are applied for all Elsevier Reed Finance BV companies. The Boards of Elsevier Reed Finance BV have adopted schedules of matters that are required to be brought to them for decision. Procedures are in place for monitoring the activities of the finance group, including a comprehensive treasury reporting system. The major risks affecting the finance group have been identified and evaluated and are subject to regular review. The controls in place to manage these risks and the level of residual risk accepted are monitored by the Boards of Elsevier Reed Finance BV.

Audit Committees

Reed Elsevier Group plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have established Audit Committees which comprise only non-executive directors, all of whom are independent. The Audit Committees, which meet regularly, are chaired by Ben van der Veer, the other members being Sir David Reid, Lisa HookLinda Sanford and Adrian Hennah.

The main roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committees in relation to the respective companies are set out in written terms of reference and include:

 

 (i)to monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the company, and any formal announcements relating to the company’s financial performance, reviewing significant financial reporting judgements contained in them;

 

 (ii)to review the company’s internal financial controls and the company’s internal control and risk management systems;

 

 (iii)to monitor and review the effectiveness of the company’s internal audit function;

 

 (iv)to make recommendations to the Board, for it to put to the shareholders for their approval in general meeting, in relation to the appointment, reappointment and removal of the external auditor and to approve the remuneration and terms of engagement of the external auditor;

 

 (v)to review and monitor the external auditors’ independence and objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process, taking into consideration relevant professional and regulatory requirements; and

 

 (vi)to develop and recommend policy on the engagement of the external auditor to supply non audit services, taking into account relevant ethical guidance regarding the provision of non audit services by the external audit firm, and to monitor compliance.

The Audit Committees report to the respective boards on their activities identifying any matters in respect of which they consider that action or improvement is needed and making recommendations as to the steps to be taken.

The Reed Elsevier Group plc Audit Committee fulfils this role in respect of the publishing and information operating business. The functions of an audit committee in respect of the financing activities are carried out by the Supervisory Board of Elsevier Reed Finance BV. The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV Audit Committees fulfil their roles from the perspective of the parent companies and both Committees have access to the reports to and the work of the Reed Elsevier Group plc Audit Committee and the Elsevier Reed Finance BV Supervisory Board in this respect.

The Audit Committees have explicit authority to investigate any matters within their terms of reference and have access to all resources and information that they may require for this purpose. The Audit Committees are entitled to obtain legal and other independent professional advice and have the authority to approve all fees payable to such advisers.

The terms of reference of each Audit Committee are reviewed annually and a copy of each is published on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Compliance with New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Rules

Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, as companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), are subject to the listing requirements of the NYSE and the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also continually monitor our compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that are applicable to foreign private issuers.

In November 2003, the SEC approved new corporate governance standards for companies that are listed on the NYSE. As a foreign private issuer, Reed Elsevier is only required to comply with certain of the NYSE corporate governance rules and is in compliance with all applicable rules. The NYSE’s rules also require disclosure of any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required of US companies under the NYSE listing standards.

Reed Elsevier follows UK corporate governance practice, which does not differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance standards for foreign issuers. We also follow Dutch corporate governance practice. We believe that our corporate governance practices do not differ in any significant way from those required to be followed by US companies under the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

The NYSE listing standards provide that US companies must have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors and with a written charter that addresses the committee’s purpose and responsibilities which, at a minimum, must be to identify individuals qualified to become board members, develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles and to oversee the evaluation of the board and management.

Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have a joint Nominations Committee and a joint Corporate Governance Committee. The written terms of reference adopted by the Reed Elsevier PLC and the Reed Elsevier NV Boards for these committees specify purposes and responsibilities that correspond to those of a US company’s nominating/corporate governance committee under the NYSE’s listing standards. The Nominations Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee is composed entirely of non executive directors.

ITEM 16A: AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Each of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV has an Audit Committee, the members of which are identified in “Item 15: Controls and Procedures”. The members of the Board of Directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and members of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV, respectively, have determined that each of their respective Audit Committees contains at least one Audit Committee financial expert within the meaning of the applicable rules and regulations of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Audit Committee financial experts serving on the Reed Elsevier PLC and the Reed Elsevier NV Audit Committees are Adrian Hennah, Sir David Reid and Ben van der Veer. Each is considered independent.

ITEM 16B: CODES OF ETHICS

Reed Elsevier has adopted a code of ethics (Code of Ethics and Business Conduct) that applies to all directors, officers and employees, and an additional separate code of ethics (Code for Senior Officers) that also applies to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV and the Group Financial Controller of Reed Elsevier Group plc. Both these codes of ethics are available on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

ITEM 16C: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants, Deloitte LLP, Deloitte Accountants BV, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates, were as follows:

 

  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
   Year Ended
December 31,
2010
   Year ended
December 31,
2012
   Year ended
December 31,
2011
 
  (in millions)   (in millions) 

Audit fees

  £4.7    £4.5    £4.7    £4.7  

Audit related fees

   0.2     0.3     0.7     0.2  

Tax fees

   0.7     0.9     0.8     0.7  

All other fees

   0.2          0.3     0.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  £5.8    £5.7    £6.5    £5.8  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Auditors’ related fees includes £0.2remuneration for audit services comprises £0.5 million (2010: £0.3(2011: £0.5 million; 2010: £0.4 million) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and £4.2 million (2011: £4.2 million; 2010: £4.1 million) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and their associates for the audit of the financial statements of the operating and financing businesses, including the review and testing of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditors’ remuneration for non audit services comprises: £0.8 million (2011: £0.7 million; 2010: £0.9 million) for audit related services such as royalty audits. Tax fees of £0.7 million (2010: £0.9 million) relate to tax compliance and advisory work. Other fees relate toservices, £0.3 million (2011: £0.2 million; 2010: nil) for due diligence and other transaction related services and £0.7 million (2011: £0.2 million; 2010: £0.3 million) for other audit related assurance services.

The Audit Committees of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non audit services provided by the auditors. These policies and procedures are summarised below.

The terms of engagement and scope of the annual audit of the financial statements are agreed by the respective Audit Committees in advance of the engagement of the auditors in respect of the annual audit. The audit fees are approved by the Audit Committees.

The auditors are not permitted to provide non audit services that would compromise their independence or violate any laws or regulations that would affect their appointment as auditors. They are eligible for selection to provide non audit services only to the extent that their skills and experience make them a logical supplier of the services. The respective Audit Committees must pre-approve the provision of all non audit services by the auditors and will consider SEC rules and other guidelines in determining the scope of permitted services. The respective Audit Committees have pre-approved non audit services in respect of individual assignments for permitted services that meet certain criteria. Assignments outside these parameters must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committees in advance of commissioning the work. Aggregate non audit fees must not exceed the annual audit fees in any given year, unless approved in advance by the Audit Committees.

All of the audit and non audit services carried out in the year ended December 31, 20112012 were pre-approved under the policies and procedures summarised above.

ITEM 16D: EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not applicable.

ITEM 16E: PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

During 2012 Reed Elsevier repurchased 23,288,616 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 12,660,296 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares for consideration of £250 million. These shares are held in treasury. On December 28, 2012 Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV announced an irrevocable, non discretionary programme to repurchase further ordinary shares up to the value of £100 million in aggregate which was completed in February 2013. Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”) havehas not made any share purchases during the year.

ITEM 16F: CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Not applicable.

ITEM 16G: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Details of Reed Elsevier’s corporate governance practices are set out on pages 90 and 9187 to 89 of Item 15: Controls and Procedures.

PART III

ITEM 17: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Registrants have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this Item.

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

ITEM 18: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial Statements filed as part of this annual report

The following financial statements and related schedules, together with reports of independent registered public accounting firms thereon, are filed as part of this annual report:

 

   Page 

Index to Financial Statements

   F-1  

Reed Elsevier Combined Financial Statements

   F-3  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-5  

Combined Income Statements

   F-6  

Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income

   F-6  

Combined Statements of Cash Flows

   F-7  

Combined Statements of Financial Position

   F-8  

Combined Statements of Changes in Equity

   F-9  

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements

   F-10  

Reed Elsevier PLC Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-55  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-56  

Consolidated Income Statements

   F-57  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

   F-57  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   F-58  

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

   F-59  

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

   F-60  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-61  

Reed Elsevier NV Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-69  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-70  

Consolidated Income Statements

   F-71  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

   F-71  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   F-72  

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

   F-73  

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

   F-74  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-75  

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

 

REED ELSEVIER

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and members of Reed Elsevier PLC and to the members of the Supervisory and Executive Boards and the shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV:

We have audited the accompanying combined statements of financial position which compriseof Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures (together “the combined businesses”the “Combined Businesses”) as ofat December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the related combined income statements and combined statements of comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for each of the years then ended. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such combined financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint venturesthe Combined Businesses as ofat December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the combined results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the combined businessesCombined Businesses’ internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the combined businessesCombined Businesses’ internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ DELOITTE LLP

London, United Kingdom

February 15, 201227, 2013

 

/s/ DELOITTE ACCOUNTANTS B.V.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

February 15, 201227, 2013

REED ELSEVIER

COMBINED INCOME STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Revenue

   3     6,002    6,055    6,071     3     6,116    6,002    6,055  

Cost of sales

     (2,126  (2,209  (2,252     (2,139  (2,126  (2,209
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

     3,876    3,846    3,819       3,977    3,876    3,846  

Selling and distribution costs

     (1,075  (1,091  (1,112     (1,015  (1,075  (1,091

Administration and other expenses

     (1,626  (1,687  (1,935     (1,628  (1,626  (1,687

Share of results of joint ventures

     30    22    15       24    30    22  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating profit

   4     1,205    1,090    787     4     1,358    1,205    1,090  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Finance income

   9     17    8    7     9     16    17    8  

Finance costs

   9     (252  (284  (298   9     (232  (252  (284
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net finance costs

     (235  (276  (291     (216  (235  (276
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Disposals and other non operating items

   10     (22  (46  (61   10     45    (22  (46
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

     948    768    435       1,187    948    768  

Taxation

   11     (181  (120  (40   11     (113  (181  (120
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net profit for the year

     767    648    395       1,074    767    648  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Attributable to:

            

Parent companies’ shareholders

     760    642    391       1,069    760    642  

Non-controlling interests

     7    6    4       5    7    6  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net profit for the year

     767    648    395       1,074    767    648  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER

COMBINED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Net profit for the year

     767    648    395       1,074    767    648  

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

     32    94    (122     (136  32    94  

Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension schemes

   7     (113  (63  6  

Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes

   7     (329  (113  (63

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

     (1                 (1    

Fair value movements on disposal of available for sale investments

             1  

Transfer to net profit on disposal of available for sale investments

     11          

Fair value movements on cash flow hedges

     (24  (58  53       70    (24  (58

Transfer to net profit from hedge reserve (net of tax)

   19     37    46    84  

Transfer to net profit from cash flow hedge reserve (net of tax)

   19     21    37    46  

Tax recognised directly in equity

   11     42    29    (25   11     88    42    29  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year

     (27  48    (3     (275  (27  48  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

     740    696    392       799    740    696  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Attributable to:

            

Parent companies’ shareholders

     733    690    388       794    733    690  

Non-controlling interests

     7    6    4       5    7    6  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

     740    696    392       799    740    696  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER

COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Cash flows from operating activities

            

Cash generated from operations

   12     1,735    1,649    1,604     12     1,847    1,735    1,649  

Interest paid

     (247  (295  (302     (231  (247  (295

Interest received

     12    8    9       7    12    8  

Tax paid (net)

     (218  (9  (120     (216  (218  (9
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash from operating activities

     1,282    1,353    1,191       1,407    1,282    1,353  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

            

Acquisitions

   12     (481  (50  (94   12     (316  (481  (50

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

     (85  (83  (78     (70  (85  (83

Expenditure on internally developed intangible assets

     (265  (228  (164     (263  (265  (228

Purchase of investments

     (10  (5  (3     (7  (10  (5

Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment

     7    7    4       7    7    7  

Net proceeds/(costs) from other disposals

     80    6    (2

Gross proceeds from other disposals

     235    101    66  

Payments on other disposals

     (82  (21  (60

Dividends received from joint ventures

     33    24    23       20    33    24  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (721  (329  (314     (476  (721  (329
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

            

Dividends paid to shareholders of the parent companies

     (497  (483  (457     (521  (497  (483

Distributions to non-controlling interests

     (9  (8  (3     (4  (9  (8

Increase/(decrease) in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper

     210    (143  107  

(Decrease)/increase in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper

     (434  210    (143

Issuance of other loans

             1,807       592          

Repayment of other loans

     (248  (394  (2,862     (437  (248  (394

Repayment of finance leases

     (22  (7  (2     (4  (22  (7

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

     (48        

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interests

     7    (48    

Repurchase of ordinary shares

     (250        

Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares

     9    11    834       48    9    11  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (605  (1,024  (576     (1,003  (605  (1,024
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (44      301  

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (72  (44    
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Movement in cash and cash equivalents

            

At start of year

     742    734    375       726    742    734  

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (44      301  

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (72  (44    

Exchange translation differences

     28    8    58       (13  28    8  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

At end of year

     726    742    734       641    726    742  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER

COMBINED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS AT DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Non-current assets

            

Goodwill

   15     4,729    4,441    4,339     15     4,545    4,729    4,441  

Intangible assets

   16     3,494    3,457    3,632     16     3,275    3,494    3,457  

Investments in joint ventures

   17     124    136    135     17     100    124    136  

Other investments

   17     64    48    41     17     79    64    48  

Property, plant and equipment

   18     288    291    292     18     264    288    291  

Net pension assets

   7         55    110     7             55  

Deferred tax assets

   20     212    151    208     20     79    212    151  

Derivative financial instruments

   19     138          
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
     8,911    8,579    8,757       8,480    8,911    8,579  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Current assets

            

Inventories and pre-publication costs

   21     190    228    275     21     159    190    228  

Trade and other receivables

   22     1,483    1,475    1,492     22     1,380    1,483    1,475  

Derivative financial instruments

   19     149    134    71     19     57    149    134  

Cash and cash equivalents

     726    742    734       641    726    742  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
     2,548    2,579    2,572       2,237    2,548    2,579  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Assets held for sale

   23     44        5     23     297    44      
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

     11,503    11,158    11,334       11,014    11,503    11,158  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Current liabilities

            

Trade and other payables

   24     2,657    2,584    2,471     24     2,544    2,657    2,584  

Derivative financial instruments

   19     69    80    102     19     11    69    80  

Borrowings

   25     982    516    678     25     730    982    516  

Taxation

     677    646    479       603    677    646  

Provisions

   27     39    71    134     27     30    39    71  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
     4,424    3,897    3,864       3,918    4,424    3,897  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Non-current liabilities

            

Borrowings

   25     3,300    3,786    4,028     25     3,162    3,300    3,786  

Deferred tax liabilities

   20     1,236    1,192    1,272     20     919    1,236    1,192  

Net pension obligations

   7     242    225    345     7     466    242    225  

Provisions

   27     87    88    61     27     139    87    88  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
     4,865    5,291    5,706       4,686    4,865    5,291  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Liabilities associated with assets held for sale

   23     17        5     23     96    17      
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

     9,306    9,188    9,575       8,700    9,306    9,188  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets

     2,197    1,970    1,759       2,314    2,197    1,970  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Capital and reserves

            

Combined share capitals

   29     223    224    225     29     223    223    224  

Combined share premiums

   30     2,723    2,754    2,807     30     2,727    2,723    2,754  

Combined shares held in treasury

   31     (663  (677  (698   31     (899  (663  (677

Translation reserve

   32     88    29    (100   32     (23  88    29  

Other combined reserves

   33     (199  (387  (502   33     252    (199  (387
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Combined shareholders’ equity

     2,172    1,943    1,732       2,280    2 ,172    1,943  

Non-controlling interests

     25    27    27       34    25    27  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

     2,197    1,970    1,759       2,314    2,197    1,970  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

 Note Combined
share
capitals
£m
 Combined
share
premiums
£m
 Combined
shares
held in
treasury
£m
 Translation
reserve

£m
 Other
combined
reserves
£m
 Combined
shareholders’
equity

£m
 Non-
controlling
interests
£m
 Total
equity
£m
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

   223    2,723    (663  88    (199  2,172    25    2,197  

Total comprehensive income for the year

               (136  930    794    5    799  

Dividends paid

  14                    (521  (521  (4  (525

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   1    47                48        48  

Repurchase of ordinary shares

  31            (250          (250      (250

Increase in share based remuneration reserve

                   31    31        31  

Settlement of share awards

           7        (7            

Acquisitions

                           9    9  

Disposal of non-controlling interests

                   6    6    1    7  

Exchange differences on translation of capital and reserves

   (1  (43  7    25    12        (2  (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   223    2,727    (899  (23  252    2,280    34    2,314  
 Note Combined
share
capitals
£m
 Combined
share
premiums
£m
 Combined
shares
held in
treasury
£m
 Translation
reserve
£m
 Other
combined
reserves
£m
 Combined
shareholders’
equity
£m
 Non-
controlling
interests
£m
 Total
equity
£m
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2011

   224    2,754    (677  29    (387  1,943    27    1,970     224    2,754    (677  29    (387  1,943    27    1,970  

Total comprehensive income for the year

               32    701    733    7    740                 32    701    733    7    740  

Dividends paid

  14                    (497  (497  (9  (506  14                    (497  (497  (9  (506

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

       9                9        9         9                9        9  

Increase in share based remuneration reserve

                   27    27        27                     27    27        27  

Non-controlling interest in acquisition

                           5    5  

Acquisition of non-controlling interest

                   (43  (43  (5  (48

Settlement of share awards

           7        (7                       7        (7            

Acquisitions

                           5    5  

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

                   (43  (43  (5  (48

Exchange differences on translation of capital and reserves

   (1  (40  7    27    7                 (1  (40  7    27    7              
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

   223    2,723    (663  88    (199  2,172    25    2,197     223    2,723    (663  88    (199  2,172    25    2,197  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2010

   225    2,807    (698  (100  (502  1,732    27    1,759     225    2,807    (698  (100  (502  1,732    27    1,759  

Total comprehensive income for the year

               94    596    690    6    696                 94    596    690    6    696  

Dividends paid

  14                    (483  (483  (8  (491  14                    (483  (483  (8  (491

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

       11                11        11         11                11        11  

Decrease in share based remuneration reserve

                   (7  (7      (7                   (7  (7      (7

Settlement of share awards

           9        (9                       9        (9            

Exchange differences on translation of capital and reserves

   (1  (64  12    35    18        2    2     (1  (64  12    35    18        2    2  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   224    2,754    (677  29    (387  1,943    27    1,970     224    2,754    (677  29    (387  1,943    27    1,970  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2009

   209    2,529    (783  (14  (988  953    28    981  

Total comprehensive income for the year

               (122  510    388    4    392  

Dividends paid

  14                    (457  (457  (3  (460

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   20    395            419    834        834  

Increase in share based remuneration reserve

                   17    17        17  

Settlement of share awards

           57        (60  (3      (3

Exchange differences on translation of capital and reserves

   (4  (117  28    36    57        (2  (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   225    2,807    (698  (100  (502  1,732    27    1,759  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER

NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.Basis of preparation

The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and IFRS as adopted by the European Union.

On January 1, 1993 Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV contributed their businesses to two jointly owned companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. Reed Elsevier Group plc, which owns the publishing and information businesses, is incorporated in England and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, which owns the financing companies, is incorporated in the Netherlands. Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV each hold a 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc. Reed Elsevier PLC holds a 39% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV, with Reed Elsevier NV holding a 61% interest. Reed Elsevier PLC additionally holds an indirect equity interest in Reed Elsevier NV, reflecting the arrangements entered into between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV at the time of the merger, which determined the equalisation ratio whereby one Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share is, in broad terms, intended to confer equivalent economic interests to 1.538 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

The equalisation agreement between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV has the effect that their shareholders can be regarded as having the interests of a single economic group. The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements (“the combined financial statements”) represent the combined interests of both sets of shareholders and encompass the businesses of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, together with the two parent companies, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (“the combined businesses”).

 

2.Accounting policies

The Reed Elsevier accounting policies are set out below:

Principles of combination

In preparing the combined financial statements, subsidiaries of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV are accounted for under the purchaseacquisition method and investments in associates and joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method. All transactions and balances between the combined businesses are eliminated.

On acquisition of a subsidiary, or interest in an associate or joint venture, fair values, reflecting conditions at the date of acquisition, are attributed to the net assets, including identifiable intangible assets acquired. This includes those adjustments made to bring accounting policies into line with those of the combined businesses. The results of subsidiaries sold or acquired are included in the combined financial statements up to or from the date that control passes from or to the combined businesses.

Non-controlling interests in the net assets of the combined businesses are identified separately from combined shareholders’ equity. Non-controlling interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date of the original acquisition and the non-controlling share of changes in equity since the date of acquisition.

Foreign exchange translation

The combined financial statements are presented in pounds sterling.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each statement of financial position date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial position date. Exchange differences arising are recorded in the income statement other than where hedge accounting applies as set out below.

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at exchange rates prevailing on the statement of financial position date. Income and expense items and cash flows of foreign operations are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Significant individual items of income and expense and cash flows in foreign operations are translated at the rate prevailing on the date of transaction. Exchange differences arising are classified as equity and transferred to the translation reserve. When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative translation differences are recognised within the income statement in the period.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

Reed Elsevier uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward contracts, to hedge its exposure to certain foreign exchange risks. Details of Reed Elsevier’s accounting policies in respect of derivative financial instruments are set out below.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

Revenue

Revenue represents the invoiced value of sales less anticipated returns on transactions completed by performance, excluding customer sales taxes and sales between the combined businesses.

Revenues are recognised for the various categories of turnover as follows: subscriptions — on periodic despatch of subscribed product or rateably over the period of the subscription where performance is not measurable by despatch; circulation and transactional — on despatch or occurrence of the transaction; advertising — on publication or over the period of online display; and exhibitions — on occurrence of the exhibition.

Where sales consist of two or more independent components whose value can be reliably measured, revenue is recognised on each component as it is completed by performance, based on attribution of relative value.

Employee benefits

The expense of defined benefit pension schemes and other post-retirement employee benefits is determined using the projected unit credit method and charged in the income statement as an operating expense, based on actuarial assumptions reflecting market conditions at the beginning of the financial year. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.

Past service costs are recognised immediately to the extent that benefits have vested, or, if not vested, on a straight line basis over the period until the benefits vest.

Net pension obligations in respect of defined benefit schemes are included in the statement of financial position at the present value of scheme liabilities, less the fair value of scheme assets. Where schemes are in surplus, i.e. assets exceed liabilities, the net pension assets are separately included in the statement of financial position. Any net pension asset is limited to the extent that the asset is recoverable through reductions in future contributions.

The expense of defined contribution pension schemes and other employee benefits is charged in the income statement as incurred.

Share based remuneration

The fair value of share based remuneration is determined at the date of grant and recognised as an expense in the income statement on a straight line basis over the vesting period, taking account of the estimated number of shares that are expected to vest. Market based performance criteria are taken into account when determining the fair value at the date of grant. Non-market based performance criteria are taken into account when estimating the number of shares expected to vest. The fair value of share based remuneration is determined by use of a binomial or Monte Carlo simulation model as appropriate. All Reed Elsevier’s share based remuneration is equity settled.

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that takes a substantial period of time to bring to use are capitalised. All other interest on borrowings is expensed as incurred. The cost of issuing borrowings is generally expensed over the period of borrowing so as to produce a constant periodic rate of charge.

Taxation

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior year taxable profits, and the movements on deferred tax that are recognised in the income statement.

The tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using the applicable tax rates that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the date of the statement of financial position.

Deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts, it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is not recognised on temporary differences arising in respect of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would become payable on the distribution of retained profits from foreign subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.

Movements in deferred tax are charged or credited in the income statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised in equity. Deferred tax credits in respect of share based remuneration are recognised in equity to the extent that expected tax deductions exceed the related expense.

Goodwill

On the acquisition of a subsidiary or business, the purchase consideration is allocated between the net tangible and intangible assets on a fair value basis, with any excess purchase consideration representing goodwill. Goodwill arising on acquisitions also includes amounts corresponding to deferred tax liabilities recognised in respect of acquired intangible assets.

Goodwill is recognised as an asset and reviewed for impairment at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in the income statement and not subsequently reversed.

On disposal of a subsidiary or business, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination are stated in the statement of financial position at their fair value as at the date of acquisition, less accumulated amortisation. Internally generated intangible assets are stated in the statement of financial position at the directly attributable cost of creation of the asset, less accumulated amortisation.

Intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations comprise: market related assets (e.g. trademarks, imprints, brands); customer related assets (e.g. subscription bases, customer lists, customer relationships); editorial content; software and systems (e.g. application infrastructure, product delivery platforms, in-process research and development); contract based assets (e.g. publishing rights, exhibition rights, supply contracts); and other intangible assets. Internally generated intangible assets typically comprise software and systems development where an identifiable asset is created that is probable to generate future economic benefits.

Intangible assets, other than brands and imprints determined to have indefinite lives, are amortised systematically over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of intangible assets with finite lives are as follows: market and customer related assets — 3 to 40 years; content, software and other acquired intangible assets — 3 to 20 years; and internally developed intangible assets — 3 to 10 years. Brands and imprints determined to have indefinite lives are not amortised and are subject to an impairment review at least annually.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated in the statement of financial position at cost less accumulated depreciation. No depreciation is provided on freehold land. Freehold buildings and long leases are depreciated over their estimated useful lives up to a maximum of 50 years. Short leases are written off over the duration of the lease. Depreciation is provided on other assets on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows: leasehold improvements — shorter of life of lease and 10 years; plant — 3 to 20 years; office furniture, fixtures and fittings — 5 to 10 years; computer systems, communication networks and equipment — 3 to 7 years.

Investments

Investments, other than investments in joint ventures and associates, are stated in the statement of financial position at fair value. Investments held as part of the venture capital portfolio are classified as held for trading, with changes in fair value reported through the income statement. All other investments are classified as available for sale with changes in fair value recognised directly in equity until the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is brought into the net profit or loss for the period. All items recognised in the income statement relating to investments, other than investments in joint ventures and associates, are reported as disposals and other non operating items.

Available for sale investments and venture capital investments held for trading represent investments in listed and unlisted securities. The fair value of listed securities is determined based on quoted market prices, and of unlisted securities on management’s estimate of fair value based on standard valuation techniques, including market comparisons and discounts of future cash flows, having regard to maximising the use of observable inputs and adjusting for risk. Advice from independent valuation experts are used as appropriate.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates are accounted for under the equity method and stated in the statement of financial position at cost as adjusted for post-acquisition changes in Reed Elsevier’s share of net assets, less any impairment in value.

Impairment

At each statement of financial position date, the carrying amounts of tangible and intangible assets and goodwill are reviewed to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell, of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, value in use estimates are made based on the cash flows of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment at least annually and whenever there is any indication that the asset may be impaired.

If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit is estimated to be less than its net carrying amount, the net carrying amount of the asset or cash generating unit is reduced to its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised immediately in the income statement in administration and other expenses.

Inventories and pre-publication costs

Inventories and pre-publication costs are stated at the lower of cost, including appropriate attributable overhead, and estimated net realisable value. Pre-publication costs, representing costs incurred in the origination of content prior to publication, are expensed systematically reflecting the expected sales profile over the estimated economic lives of the related products, generally up to five years.

Leases

Assets held under leases which confer rights and obligations similar to those attaching to owned assets are classified as assets held under finance leases and capitalised within property, plant and equipment or software and the corresponding liability to pay rentals is shown net of interest in the statement of financial position as obligations under finance leases. The capitalised value of the assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over the shorter of the periods of the leases or the useful lives of the assets concerned. The interest element of the lease payments is allocated so as to produce a constant periodic rate of charge.

Operating lease rentals are charged to the income statement on a straight line basis over the period of the leases. Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, call deposits and other short term highly liquid investments and are held in the statement of financial position at fair value.

Assets held for sale

Assets of businesses that are available for immediate sale in their current condition and for which a sales process has been initiatedis considered highly probable to complete are classified as assets held for sale, and are carried at the lower of amortised costcarrying value and fair value less costs to sell. Non-current assets are not amortised or depreciated following their classification as held for sale. Liabilities of businesses held for sale are also separately classified on the statement of financial position.

Financial instruments

Financial instruments comprise investments (other than investments in joint ventures or associates), trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, payables and accruals, provisions, borrowings and derivative financial instruments.

Investments (other than investments in joint ventures and associates) are classified as either held for trading or available for sale, as described above. (These investments are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the IFRS7 fair value hierarchy.)

Trade receivables are carried in the statement of financial position at invoiced value less allowance for estimated irrecoverable amounts. Irrecoverable amounts are estimated based on the ageing of trade receivables, experience and circumstance.

Borrowings (other than fixed rate borrowings in designated hedging relationships and for which the carrying value is adjusted to reflect changes in the fair value of the hedged risk), payables, accruals and provisions are recorded initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

Derivative financial instruments are used to hedge interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated and effective as hedges of future cash flows are recognised (net of tax) directly in equity in the hedge reserve. If a hedged firm commitment or forecasted transaction results in the recognition of a non financial asset or liability, then, at the time that the asset or liability is recognised, the associated gains or losses on the derivative that had previously been recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement of the asset or liability. For hedges that do not result in the recognition of an asset or a liability, amounts deferred in equity are recognised in the income statement in the same period in which the hedged item affects net profit or loss. Any ineffective portion of hedges is recognised immediately in the income statement.

Derivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments are classified as held for trading and recorded in the statement of financial position at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement.

Where an effective hedge is in place against changes in the fair value of fixed rate borrowings, the hedged borrowings are adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the risk being hedged with a corresponding income or expense included in the income statement within finance costs. The offsetting gains or losses from remeasuring the fair value of the related derivatives are also recognised in the income statement within finance costs. When the related derivative expires, is sold or terminated, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting, the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged borrowing is amortised in the income statement over the period to maturity of the borrowings using the effective interest method.

The fair values of interest rate swaps, interest rate options, forward rate agreements and forward foreign exchange contracts represent the replacement costs calculated using observable market rates of interest and exchange. The fair value of long term borrowings is calculated by discounting expected future cash flows at observable market rates. (These instruments are accordingly classified as Level 2 in the IFRS7 fair value hierarchy.)

Cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued when a hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is either retained in equity until the firm commitment or forecasted transaction occurs, or, where a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, is immediately credited or expensed in the income statement.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised when a present obligation exists as a result of a past event, the obligation is reasonably estimable, and it is probable that settlement of the obligation will be required. Provisions are measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the statement of financial position date.

Shares held in treasury

Shares of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV that are repurchased by the respective parent companies and not cancelled are classified as shares held in treasury. The consideration paid, including directly attributable costs, is recognised as a deduction from equity. Shares of the parent companies that are purchased by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust are also classified as shares held in treasury, with the cost recognised as a deduction from equity.

Critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The most significant accounting policies in determining the financial condition and results of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, and those requiring the most subjective or complex judgement, relate to the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, share based remuneration, pensions, litigation, taxation and property provisioning.

Goodwill and intangiblesacquired intangible assets

On acquisition of a subsidiary or business, the purchase consideration is allocated between the net tangible and intangible assets other than goodwill on a fair value basis, with any excess purchase consideration representing goodwill. The valuation of acquired intangible assets represents the estimated economic value in use, using standard valuation methodologies, including as appropriate, discounted cash flow, relief from royalty and comparable market transactions. Acquired intangible assets are capitalised and amortised systematically over their estimated useful lives, subject to impairment review.

Appropriate amortisation periods are selected based on assessments of the longevity of the brands and imprints, the strength and stability of customer relationships, the market positions of the acquired assets and the technological and competitive risks that they face. Certain intangible assets in relation to acquired science and medical publishing businesses have been determined to have indefinite lives. The longevity of these assets is evidenced by their long established and well regarded brands and imprints, and their characteristically stable market positions.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

The carrying amounts of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets in each business are reviewed for impairment at least annually. The carrying amounts of all other intangible assets are reviewed where there are indications of possible impairment. An impairment review involves a comparison of the carrying value of the asset with estimated values in use based on latest management cash flow projections. Key areas of judgement in estimating the values in use of businesses are the growth in cash flows over a five year forecast period, the long term growth rate assumed thereafter and the discount rate applied to the forecast cash flows.

The discount rates used are based on the Reed Elsevier weighted average cost of capital, adjusted to reflect a risk premium specific to each business. The pre-tax discount rates applied are 11.5%11.4% for Elsevier, 12.0%Scientific, Technical & Medical, 11.8% for LexisNexis Risk Solutions, 12.0%11.5-12.9% for LexisNexisBusiness Information, 11.6% for Legal & Professional, 12.0-12.5%and 11.2-12.9% for Reed Exhibitions and 11.5-13.0% for Reed Business Information.Exhibitions. The nominal long term growth rates, which are based on historical growth rates and the growth prospects for businesses, do not exceedare 3%. There were no charges for impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill in 2011 (2010:2012 (2011: nil; 2009: £177 million principally relating to the RBI controlled circulation titles)2010: nil).

A sensitivity analysis has been performed based on changes in key assumptions considered to be reasonably possible by management: an increase in the discount rate of 0.5%; a decrease in the compound annual growth rate for adjusted operating cash flow in the five year forecast period of 2.0%; and a decrease in perpetuity growth rates of 0.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that no impairment charges would result under any of the sensitivity scenarios. Further information is provided in note 15 to the combined financial statements.

Share based remuneration

Share based remuneration is determined based on the fair value of an award at the date of grant, and is spread over the vesting period on a straight line basis, taking into account the number of shares that are expected to vest. The fair value of awards is determined at the date of grant by use of a binomial or Monte Carlo simulation model as appropriate, which requires judgements to be made regarding share price volatility, dividend yield, risk free rates of return and expected option lives. The number of awards that are expected to vest requires judgements to be made regarding forfeiture rates and the extent to which performance conditions will be met. The assumptions are determined in conjunction with independent actuaries based on historical data and trends.

The assumptions of share price volatility of 29%30%, of expected share option life of 4 years, and of expected lapse rate of 2-5% are based on relevant historical data. Other judgements made on grant are based on market data. Assumptions as to future performance against non market related vesting conditions are based on management estimates. The charge for share based and related remuneration was £27£26 million in 2011 (2010:2012 (2011: £27 million; 2010: £11 million; 2009: £17 million). Further information is provided in note 8 to the combined financial statements.

Pensions

Accounting for defined benefit pension schemes involves judgement about uncertain events, including the life expectancy of the members, salary and pension increases, inflation, the return on scheme assets and the rate at which the future pension payments are discounted. Estimates for these factors are used in determining the pension cost and liabilities reported in the financial statements. These best estimates of future developments are made in conjunction with independent actuaries. Each scheme is subject to a periodic review by independent actuaries.

The principal assumptions as at December 31, 2011,2012, expressed as a weighted average of the various defined benefit pension schemes, were a discount rate of 4.4% (2011: 5.2% (2010: 5.6%; 2009: 5.8%2010: 5.6%), an expected return on scheme assets of 6.2% (2010: 6.8%; 2009: 7.0%) an expected rate of salary increases of 3.2% (2011: 3.5% (2010: 4.1%; 2009: 4.0%2010: 4.1%) and inflation of 2.7% (2011: 2.9% (2010: 3.2%; 2009: 3.1%2010: 3.2%). The expected return on scheme assets, set at the beginning of the year, was 6.2% (2011: 6.8%; 2010: 7.0%). Future pension increases are assumed at 2.8% (2011: 2.9% (2010: 3.2%; 2009: 3.1%2010: 3.2%) and average life expectancy of 87-9088-89 years (2010:(2011: 87-89 years, 2009: 87-882010: 87-89 years) for scheme members currently aged 45 and 60 years. The net defined benefit pension expense was £18 million (2011: £23 million (2010:million; 2010: £22 million; 2009: £18 million). Excluding the net pension financing credit, theThe service cost was £43 million (2011: £57 million (2010:million; 2010: £48 million; 2009: £24 million) after pension curtailment credits of £20 million (2011: £9 million (2010:million; 2010: £17 million; 2009: £43 million) from changes to pension plan design and staff reductions. The net pension financing credit is based on market data at the beginning of the year and was £25 million (2011: £34 million (2010:million; 2010: £26 million; 2009: £6 million) reflecting the higher market valueincrease in scheme liabilities at the beginning of scheme assets.the year compared with a year before and lower expected asset returns. Further information and sensitivity analysis is provided in note 7 to the combined financial statements.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

Litigation

Reed Elsevier is involved in various legal proceedings, which arise in the normal course of its business, relating to commercial disputes, employment, data security and product liability. Provisions for liabilities are recognised when it is probable that a settlement is required. Although the outcome of legal proceedings is uncertain, the ultimate resolution of such matters is not expected to have a material impact on results.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

Taxation

Reed Elsevier is subject to tax in numerous jurisdictions, giving rise to complex tax issues that require management to exercise judgmentjudgement in making tax determinations. While Reed Elsevier is confident that tax returns are appropriately prepared and filed, the application of tax law and practice is subject to some uncertainty and provisions are heldmaintained in respect of this. Issuesuncertain tax positions that are raised duringbelieved to appropriately reflect the courserisk with respect to tax matters under active discussion with tax authorities, or which are otherwise considered to involve uncertainty. Amounts are provided using the best estimate of regularthe amount expected to be paid based on a qualitative assessment of all relevant factors. However, it is possible that at some future date liabilities may be adjusted as a result of audits by taxing authorities. Discussions with tax auditsauthorities relating to cross-border transactions and discussions with the Internal Revenue Service including on the deductibility of interest in the US on certain cross-border financingother matters are ongoing. Although the outcome of open items cannot be predicted, no materialsignificant impact on resultsthe financial position of Reed Elsevier is expected from such issues.expected.

Reed Elsevier’s policy in respectIn addition, estimation of income taxes includes assessments of the recoverability of deferred taxation is to provide in full for all taxable temporary differences using the balance sheet liability method.tax assets. Deferred tax assets are only recognisedrecognized to the extent that they are considered recoverable based on existing tax laws and forecasts of availablefuture taxable profits against which theythe underlying tax deductions can be utilised overutilized. The recoverability of these assets is reassessed at the near term.end of each reporting period, and changes in recognition to deferred tax assets will affect the tax provision in the period of that reassessment.

Property provisions

Reed Elsevier has exposures to sub-leasesub lease shortfalls in respect of certain property leases for periods up to 2024. Provisions are recognised for net liabilities expected to arise on these exposures. Estimation of the provisions requires judgement in respect of future head lease costs, sub-leasesub lease income and the length of vacancy periods. The charge for property provisions was £62 million (2011: £16 million (2010:million; 2010: £36 million; 2009: £70 million) relating to surplus property arising on the restructuring, sale and closure of RBI businesses and includes expected losses on sub-leases entered into during 20112012 and an estimate of vacancy periods and future market conditions. Further information is provided in note 27 to the combined financial statements.

Other significant accounting policies

The accounting policies in respect of revenue recognition, pre-publication costs and development spend are also significant in determining the financial condition and results of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, although the application of these policies is more straightforward.

Revenue recognition policies, while an area of management focus, are generally straightforward in application as the timing of product or service delivery and customer acceptance for the various revenue types can be readily determined. Allowances for product returns are deducted from revenues based on historical return rates. Where sales consist of two or more components that operate independently, revenue is recognised as each component is completed by performance, based on attribution of relative value.

Pre-publication costs incurred in the creation of content prior to production and publication are typically deferred and expensed over their estimated useful lives based on sales profiles. Such costs typically comprise direct internal labour costs and externally commissioned editorial and other fees. Estimated useful lives generally do not exceed five years. Annual reviews are carried out to assess the recoverability of carrying amounts.

Development spend embraces investment in new product and other initiatives, ranging from the building of new online delivery platforms, to launch costs of new services, to building new infrastructure applications. Launch costs and other operating expenses of new products and services are expensed as incurred. The costs of building product applications and infrastructure are capitalised as intangible assets and amortised over their estimated useful lives. Impairment reviews are carried out at least annually.

Standards and amendments effective for the year

The interpretations and amendments to IFRS effective for 20112012 have not had a significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s accounting policies or reporting.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

Standards, amendments and interpretations not yeteffective

New accounting standards and amendments and their expected impact on the future accounting policies and reporting of Reed Elsevier are set out below.

IAS19 — Employee Benefits (Revised) (effective for the 2013 financial year). The revised standardinter alia changes the methodology to be used in the calculation of the net pension financing credit or charge in relation to defined benefit

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

pension schemes. Under the revised standard, pension asset returns included within the net pension financing credit or charge are to be calculated by reference to the discount rate of a high quality corporate bond (being also the discount rate applied in the calculation of pension obligations) and no longer based on the expected returns on scheme assets. Typically the effect will be to reduce the asset returns recognised in the income statement. Comparative figuresAs required under the revised standard, comparatives will be restated.restated accordingly. The revised standard also prohibits the use of certain accounting alternatives, previously permitted, that enabled the smoothing of volatility in the income statement and balance sheet in relation to pensions. Thispensions, but this will not affect Reed Elsevier’s pension accounting as such alternatives were not applied. There is no change to the measurement of pension scheme assets and obligations under the revised standard for Reed Elsevier.

Adoption of IAS19 (revised) will have no impact on Reed Elsevier’s combine balance sheet or cash flows. The net pension financing credit or charge will, with effect from 1 January 2013, be presented within net finance costs in Reed Elsevier’s combined income statement, rather than within operating profit as currently reported. Given that the revised standard may introduce greater volatility to the income statement, following adoption on 1 January 2013 the net pension financing credit or charge will be excluded from the adjusted earnings figures used by Reed Elsevier as additional performance measures.

Had IAS19 (revised) and related presentation been in effect for the 2012 financial year, operating profit for the twelve months to December 31, 2012 would have been £25m lower (2011: £34 million, 2010: £26 million) and net finance costs would have been higher by £11 million (2011: £9 million, 2010: £14 million). The balance sheet and cash flows would have been unchanged.

IFRS9 — Financial Instruments (effective for the 2015 financial year). The standard replaces the existing classification and measurement requirements in IAS39 for financial assets by requiring entities to classify them as being measured either at amortised cost or fair value depending on the business model and contractual cash flow characteristics of the asset. For financial liabilities, IFRS9 requires an entity choosing to measure a liability at fair value to present the portion of the change in its fair value due to changes in the entity’s own credit risk in the other comprehensive income rather than the income statement. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the measurement, presentation or disclosure of financial assets and liabilities in the combined financial statements.

IFRS10 — Consolidated Financial Statements (effective for the 2013 financial year). The standard introduces a single consolidation model for all entities based on control, irrespective of the nature of the investee. IFRS10 replaces IAS27 — Separate Financial Statements. Adoption of the standard is not expected to significantlyhave a significant impact on the measurement, presentation or disclosure of the consolidation of entities in the combined financial statements.

IFRS11 — Joint Arrangements (effective for the 2013 financial year). This standard classifies joint arrangements as either joint ventures or a joint operation and removes the option to proportionately consolidate joint ventures. IFRS11 replaces IAS28 — Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. Adoption of the standard is not expected to significantlyhave a significant impact on the measurement, presentation or disclosure of the joint ventures in the combined financial statements.

IFRS12 — Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (effective for the 2013 financial year). This standard combines the disclosure requirements for subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities into one standard. Adoption of the standard may result in additional disclosures in the combined financial statements but is not expected to have a significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s reporting.

IFRS13 — Fair Value Measurement (effective for the 2013 financial year). The standard consolidates the guidance and disclosure requirements of fair value measurement contained throughout IFRS and also requires new disclosures related to valuation techniques and inputs into fair value measurements. Adoption of the standard is not expected to significantlyhave a significant impact on the measurement, presentation or disclosure of financial assets and liabilities in the combined financial statements.

IAS1 — Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income — Amendments to IAS1 (effective for the 20122013 financial year). The standard amends the grouping of items presented in the statement of comprehensive income into items that may be reclassified (or recycled) to the profit or loss in a future period and items that will never be reclassified. Adoption of the standard will lead to some re-presentation of the items in the statement of comprehensive income in the combined financial statements.

Additionally, a number of interpretations have been issued which are not expected to have any significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s accounting policies and reporting.

3.Segment analysis

Reed Elsevier’s reported segments are based on the internal reporting structure and financial information provided to the Chief Executive Officer and Boards.

Reed Elsevier is a world leading provider of professional information solutions organised in 2011 as five business segments: Elsevier,Scientific, Technical & Medical, providing information and tools to help its customers improve scientific technical and medical information solutions; LexisNexishealthcare outcomes; Risk Solutions, providing risktools that combine proprietary, public and third-party information with advanced technology and analytics to business and government customers; LexisNexis Legal & Professional, providing legal, tax, regulatory and business information solutions to professionals, business and government customers; Reed Exhibitions, organising trade exhibitions and conferences; and Reedanalytics; Business Information, providing data services, information and marketing solutions to business professionals.

With effect from January 1, 2011 LexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, LexisNexis Risk Solutionsprofessionals; Legal, providing legal, tax, regulatory news & business information to legal, corporate, government, accounting and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately. Comparative profit figures for 2010 have been restated on a proforma basis as if the businesses had operated separately in that year. Proforma profit information for 2009 is not availableacademic markets; and the cost to develop it would be excessive.Exhibitions, organising exhibitions and conferences.

Adjusted operating profit is one of the key financial measuressegmental profit measure used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources.Reed Elsevier in assessing performance. It is stated before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets, and goodwill, exceptional restructuring (none in 2011), the share of profit on disposals in joint ventures, exceptional restructuring (none in 2012 or 2011), acquisition related costs, and is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures.

Operating profit by segment is included as supplementary information.

Analysis by business segment

 

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

Revenue

    

Elsevier

   2,058    2,026    1,985  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   908    927    865  

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   1,634    1,691    1,692  

Reed Exhibitions

   707    693    638  

Reed Business Information

   695    718    891  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   6,002    6,055    6,071  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit

    

Elsevier

   695    647    563  

LexisNexis

     337  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   181    165   

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   144    159   

Reed Exhibitions

   132    127    79  

Reed Business Information

   68        (163
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sub-total

   1,220    1,098    816  

Corporate costs

   (49  (34  (35

Unallocated net pension financing credit

   34    26    6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,205    1,090    787  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

    

Elsevier

   768    724    693  

LexisNexis

     665  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   362    354   

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   229    238   

Reed Exhibitions

   167    158    152  

Reed Business Information

   110    89    89  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sub-total

   1,636    1,563    1,599  

Corporate costs

   (44  (34  (35

Unallocated net pension financing credit

   34    26    6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,626    1,555    1,570  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

Revenue

    

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   2,063    2,058    2,026  

Risk Solutions

   926    908    927  

Business Information

   663    695    718  

Legal

   1,610    1,634    1,691  

Exhibitions

   854    707    693  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   6,116    6,002    6,055  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit

    

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   706    695    647  

Risk Solutions

   281    181    165  

Business Information

   76    68      

Legal

   146    144    159  

Exhibitions

   171    132    127  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sub-total

   1,380    1,220    1,098  

Corporate costs

   (47  (49  (34

Unallocated net pension financing credit

   25    34    26  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,358    1,205    1,090  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

    

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   780    768    724  

Risk Solutions

   392    362    354  

Business Information

   119    110    89  

Legal

   234    229    238  

Exhibitions

   210    167    158  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sub-total

   1,735    1,636    1,563  

Corporate costs

   (47  (44  (34

Unallocated net pension financing credit

   25    34    26  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,713    1,626    1,555  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

3.Segment analysis – (continued)

 

Analysis by geographical origin

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Revenue

            

North America

   3,103     3,213     3,228     3,122     3,103     3,213  

United Kingdom

   947     907     897     966     947     907  

The Netherlands

   616     620     662     611     616     620  

Rest of Europe

   783     825     851     788     783     825  

Rest of world

   553     490     433     629     553     490  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   6,002     6,055     6,071     6,116     6,002     6,055  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Analysis by geographical market

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Revenue

            

North America

   3,219     3,303     3,310     3,154     3,219     3,303  

United Kingdom

   485     490     513     442     485     490  

The Netherlands

   189     204     243     165     189     204  

Rest of Europe

   1,095     1,131     1,132     1,176     1,095     1,131  

Rest of world

   1,014     927     873     1,179     1,014     927  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   6,002     6,055     6,071     6,116     6,002     6,055  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Analysis by type

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Revenue

            

Subscriptions

   2,819     2,709     2,711     2,978     2,819     2,709  

Circulation/transactions

   1,649     1,760     1,708     1,602     1,649     1,760  

Advertising

   437     491     585     350     437     491  

Exhibitions

   700     675     626     846     700     675  

Other

   397     420     441     340     397     420  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   6,002     6,055     6,071     6,116     6,002     6,055  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Revenue is analysed before the £91 million (2011: £128 million (2010:million; 2010: £116 million; 2009: £118 million) share of joint ventures’ revenue, of which £23 million (2010: £24 million; 2009: £25 million) relates to LexisNexis Legal & Professional, principally to Giuffrè, £103 million (2010: £89 million; 2009: £90 million) relates to Reed Exhibitions and £2 million (2010: £3(2011: £2 million; 2009:2010: £3 million) relates to Reed Business Information.Information, £22 million (2011: £23 million; 2010: £24 million) relates to Legal, principally to Giuffrè, and £67 million (2011: £103 million; 2010: £89 million) relates to Exhibitions.

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures of £24 million (2011: £30 million (2010:million; 2010: £22 million; 2009: £15 million) included in operating profit comprises £4nil (2011: £1 million; 2010: £1 million) relating to Business Information, £2 million (2010:(2011: £4 million; 2009:2010: £4 million) relating to LexisNexis Legal & Professional,and £22 million (2011: £25 million (2010:million; 2010: £17 million; 2009: £10 million) relating to Reed Exhibitions and £1 million (2010: £1 million; 2009: £1 million) relating to Reed Business Information.Exhibitions. The unallocated net pension financing credit of £25 million (2011: £34 million (2010:million; 2010: £26 million; 2009: £6 million) comprises the expected return on pension scheme assets of £221 million (2011: £235 million (2010:million; 2010: £217 million; 2009: £189 million) less interest on pension scheme liabilities of £196 million (2011: £201 million (2010:million; 2010: £191 million; 2009: £183 million).

3.Segment analysis – (continued)

 

A reconciliation of operating profit to adjusted operating profit is provided below:

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Operating profit

   1,205    1,090     787     1,358     1,205    1,090  

Adjustments:

          

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   359    349     368     329     359    349  

Impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill

            177  

Exceptional restructuring costs

       57     182              57  

Acquisition related costs

   52    50     48     21     52    50  

Share of profit on disposals in joint ventures

   (1                 (1    

Reclassification of tax in joint ventures

   11    9     8     5     11    9  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

   1,626    1,555     1,570     1,713     1,626    1,555  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Analysis by business segment

 

   2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
 

Expenditure on acquired goodwill and intangible assets

      

Elsevier

   43     13     4  

LexisNexis

       7  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

            

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

        34    

Reed Exhibitions

   36     6     12  

Reed Business Information

   532     1       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   611     54     23  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital expenditure additions

      

Elsevier

   94     81     77  

LexisNexis

       150  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   23     31    

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   203     179    

Reed Exhibitions

   22     12     11  

Reed Business Information

   18     12     19  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   360     315     257  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill

      

Elsevier

   72     75     79  

LexisNexis

       230  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   156     149    

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   78     72    

Reed Exhibitions

   24     23     63  

Reed Business Information

   29     30     173  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   359     349     545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation and other amortisation

      

Elsevier

   69     74     80  

LexisNexis

       107  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   26     29    

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   87     94    

Reed Exhibitions

   10     14     7  

Reed Business Information

   15     26     29  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   207     237     223  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Expenditure on acquired goodwill and intangible assets

      

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   120     43     13  

Risk Solutions

   15            

Business Information

        532     1  

Legal 

   80          34  

Exhibitions

   178     36     6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   393     611     54  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital expenditure additions

      

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   106     94     81  

Risk Solutions

   21     23     31  

Business Information

   17     18     12  

Legal 

   173     203     179  

Exhibitions

   25     22     12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   342     360     315  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

      

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   68     72     75  

Risk Solutions

   109     156     149  

Business Information

   37     29     30  

Legal 

   83     78     72  

Exhibitions

   32     24     23  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   329     359     349  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation and other amortisation

      

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   82     69     74  

Risk Solutions

   23     26     29  

Business Information

   14     15     26  

Legal 

   92     87     94  

Exhibitions

   16     10     14  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   227     207     237  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

3.Segment analysis – (continued)

 

Capital expenditure comprises additions to property, plant and equipment and internally developed intangible assets. Amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill includes amounts in respect of joint ventures of £4£1 million (2010:(2011: £4 million; 2009: £122010: £4 million) in Reed Exhibitions. Other than the depreciation and amortisation above, non cash items includes a £31 million charge (2011: £27 million charge (2010:charge; 2010: £7 million credit; 2009: £17 million charge)credit) relating to the recognition of share based remuneration, comprising £5 million (2010:(2011: £5 million charge; 2010: £2 million credit; 2009: £4 million charge)credit) in Elsevier,Scientific, Technical & Medical, nil (2011: £3 million (2010: £2 million; 2009:2010: £2 million) in LexisNexis Risk Solutions, £3 million (2011: £2 million; 2010: £3 million credit) in Business Information, £7 million (2011: £6 million (2010:million; 2010: £1 million credit; 2009: £5credit) in Legal, £4 million charge) in LexisNexis Legal & Professional,(2011: £3 million (2010:million; 2010: £1 million credit; 2009:credit) in Exhibitions and £12 million (2011: £8 million; 2010: £2 million charge) in Reed Exhibitions, £2 million (2010: £3 million credit; 2009: £2 million charge) in Reed Business Information and £8 million (2010: £2 million credit; 2009: £2 million charge)credit) in Corporate.

Analysis by geographical location

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Non-current assets

            

North America

   6,984     6,716     6,635     6,514     6,984     6,716  

United Kingdom

   517     456     495     524     517     456  

The Netherlands

   123     140     156     120     123     140  

Rest of Europe

   783     851     950     729     783     851  

Rest of world

   292     210     203     376     292     210  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   8,699     8,373     8,439     8,263     8,699     8,373  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-current assets by geographical location exclude amounts relating to deferred tax, and net pension assets.assets and derivative financial instruments.

 

4.Operating profit

Operating profit is stated after charging/(crediting) the following:

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Staff costs

            

Wages and salaries

     1,535    1,594    1,610       1,543    1,535    1,594  

Social security costs

     173    179    183       187    173    179  

Pensions

   7     62    54    42     7     64    62    54  

Share based and related remuneration

     27    11    17       26    27    11  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total staff costs

     1,797    1,838    1,852       1,820    1,797    1,838  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment

      

Depreciation and amortisation

      

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   16     355    345    364     16     328    355    345  

Share of joint ventures’ amortisation of acquired intangible assets

     4    4    4       1    4    4  

Impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill

   15, 16             169  

Impairment of goodwill in joint ventures

             8  

Amortisation of internally developed intangible assets

   16     132    158    139     16     151    132    158  

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

   18     75    79    84     18     76    75    79  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total depreciation, amortisation and impairment

     566    586    768  

Total depreciation and amortisation

     556    566    586  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other expenses and income

            

Pre-publication costs, inventory expenses and other cost of sales

     2,126    2,209    2,252       2,139    2,126    2,209  

Operating lease rentals expense

     116    123    132       112    116    123  

Operating lease rentals income

     (11  (11  (12     (10  (11  (11
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Depreciation amortisation and impairmentamortisation charges are included within administration and other expenses.

5.Auditors’ remuneration

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

For audit services

   4.7     4.5     4.5     4.7     4.7     4.5  

For non audit services

   1.1     1.2     1.2     1.8     1.1     1.2  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total auditors’ remuneration

   5.8     5.7     5.7     6.5     5.8     5.7  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Auditors’ remuneration for audit services comprises £0.5 million (2010: £0.4(2011: £0.5 million; 2009:2010: £0.4 million) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and £4.2 million (2010: £4.1(2011: £4.2 million; 2009:2010: £4.1 million) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and their associates for the audit of the financial statements of the operating and financing businesses, including the review and testing of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditors’ remuneration for non audit services comprises: £0.8 million (2011: £0.7 million (2010:million; 2010: £0.9 million; 2009: £0.7 million) for taxationtax compliance services, £0.3 million (2011: £0.2 million (2010: nil; 2009: £0.1 million)million; 2010: nil) for due diligence and other transaction related services and £0.7 million (2011: £0.2 million (2010:million; 2010: £0.3 million; 2009: £0.4 million) for other audit related assurance services.

 

6.Personnel

Number of people employed

 

  At December 31,   Average during the year   At December 31   Average during the year 
  2011   2010   2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2012   2011   2010 

Business segment

                    

Elsevier

   6,900     6,700     6,900     6,800     6,900  

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   4,000     4,400     4,300     4,500     4,700  

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   10,300     10,300     10,400     10,400     10,700  

Reed Exhibitions

   2,800     2,600     2,700     2,600     2,600  

Reed Business Information

   5,600     5,300     5,400     5,800     7,500  

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   7,000     6,900     7,000     6,900     6,800  

Risk Solutions

   4,100     4,000     4,000     4,300     4,500  

Business Information

   4,800     5,600     5,200     5,400     5,800  

Legal

   10,400     10,300     10,400     10,400     10,400  

Exhibitions

   3,200     2,800     3,000     2,700     2,600  

Sub-total

   29,600     29,300     29,700     30,100     32,400     29,500     29,600     29,600     29,700     30,100  

Corporate/shared functions

   900     900     900     900     900     900     900     900     900     900  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   30,500     30,200     30,600     31,000     33,300     30,400     30,500     30,500     30,600     31,000  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Geographical location

                    

North America

   16,000     16,500     16,300     16,900     18,000     15,700     16,000     15,900     16,300     16,900  

United Kingdom

   4,600     4,600     4,600     4,700     5,000     4,100     4,600     4,200     4,600     4,700  

The Netherlands

   1,600     1,700     1,600     1,800     2,100     1,600     1,600     1,600     1,600     1,800  

Rest of Europe

   3,700     3,800     3,800     4,000     4,500     3,600     3,700     3,700     3,800     4,000  

Rest of world

   4,600     3,600     4,300     3,600     3,700     5,400     4,600     5,100     4,300     3,600  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   30,500     30,200     30,600     31,000     33,300     30,400     30,500     30,500     30,600     31,000  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

7.Pension schemes

A number of pension schemes are operated around the world. TheHistorically, the major schemes arehave been of the defined benefit type with assets held in separate trustee administered funds. The largest defined benefit schemes which cover the majority of employees, are in the UK, the US and the Netherlands. Under these plans, employees are entitled to retirement benefits dependent on the number of years service provided.

7.Pension schemes – (continued)

 

The principal assumptions for the purpose of valuation under IAS19 — Employee Benefits are presented below as the weighted average of the various defined benefit pension schemes. The defined benefit pension expense for each year is based on the assumptions and scheme valuations set at December 31 of the prior year.

 

  At December 31,   At December 31 
  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Discount rate

   5.2  5.6  5.8   4.4  5.2  5.6

Expected rate of return on scheme assets

   6.2  6.8  7.0   n/a    6.2  6.8

Expected rate of salary increases

   3.5  4.1  4.0   3.2  3.5  4.1

Inflation

   2.9  3.2  3.1   2.7  2.9  3.2

Future pension increases

   2.9  3.2  3.1   2.8  2.9  3.2

The discount rate is set by reference to AA corporate bond yields. The expected rates of return on individual categories of scheme assets are determined by reference to relevant market indices and market expectations of real rates of return. The overall expected rate of return on scheme assets is based on the weighted average of each asset category.

Mortality assumptions used in assessing defined benefit obligations make allowance for future improvements in longevity and have been determined by reference to applicable mortality statistics and expectations for each scheme. The average life expectancies assumed in the valuation of the defined benefit obligations are set out below:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Average life expectancy

(at December 31)

  Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
   Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
   Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
   Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
   Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
   Male
(years)
   Female
(years)
 

Member currently aged 60

   88     87     88     87     88     87     88     88     88     87     88     87  

Member currently aged 45

   89     88     89     88     88     87     89     89     89     88     89     88  

The pension expense recognised within the income statement comprises:

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Service cost (including curtailment credits of £9 million (2010: £17 million; 2009: £43 million))

   57    48    24  

Service cost (including settlement and curtailment credits of £20 million (2011: £9 million; 2010: £17 million))

   43    57    48  

Interest on pension scheme liabilities

   201    191    183     196    201    191  

Expected return on scheme assets

   (235  (217  (189   (221  (235  (217
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net defined benefit pension expense

   23    22    18     18    23    22  

Defined contribution pension expense

   39    32    24     46    39    32  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total pension expense

   62    54    42     64    62    54  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

7.Pension schemes – (continued)

 

The amount recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of defined benefit pension schemes at the start and end of the year and the movements during the year were as follows:

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
 Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
 Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
  Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
 Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
 Defined
benefit
obligations
£m
 Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Net
pension
obligations
£m
 

At start of year

  (3,677  3,507    (170  (3,302  3,067    (235  (3,051  2,682    (369  (3,876  3,634    (242  (3,677  3,507    (170  (3,302  3,067    (235

Service cost

  (57      (57  (48      (48  (24      (24  (43      (43  (57      (57  (48      (48

Interest on pension scheme liabilities

  (201      (201  (191      (191  (183      (183  (196      (196  (201      (201  (191      (191

Expected return on scheme assets

      235    235        217    217        189    189        221    221        235    235        217    217  

Actuarial (loss)/gain

  (78  (35  (113  (261  198    (63  (295  301    6    (416  87    (329  (78  (35  (113  (261  198    (63

Contributions by employer

      66    66        154    154        101    101        116    116        66    66        154    154  

Contributions by employees

  (11  11        (11  11        (12  12        (11  11        (11  11        (11  11      

Benefits paid

  141    (141      139    (139      134    (134      216    (216      141    (141      139    (139    

Exchange translation differences

  7    (9  (2  (3  (1  (4  129    (84  45    54    (47  7    7    (9  (2  (3  (1  (4
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At end of year

  (3,876  3,634    (242  (3,677  3,507    (170  (3,302  3,067    (235  (4,272  3,806    (466  (3,876  3,634    (242  (3,677  3,507    (170
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The net pension obligations of £242£466 million at December 31, 2011 (2010:2012 (2011: £242 million; 2010: £170 million; 2009: £235 million) comprise schemes in deficit with net pension obligations of £466 million (2011: £242 million (2010:million; 2010: £225 million; 2009: £345 million) and schemes in surplus with net pension assets of nil (2010:(2011: nil; 2010: £55 million; 2009: £110 million).

As at December 31, 20112012 the defined benefit obligations comprise £4,112 million (2011: £3,721 million (2010:million; 2010: £3,531 million; 2009: £3,172 million) in relation to funded schemes and £160 million (2011: £155 million (2010:million; 2010: £146 million; 2009: £130 million) in relation to unfunded schemes. The weighted average duration of defined benefit scheme liabilities is 19 years (2010:(2011: 19 years; 2009:2010: 19 years).

Deferred tax liabilities of nil (2010:(2011: nil; 2010: £15 million; 2009: £31 million) and deferred tax assets of £153 million (2011: £86 million (2010:million; 2010: £78 million; 2009: £122 million) are recognised in respect of the pension scheme surpluses and deficits respectively.

The fair value of scheme assets held as equities, bonds and other assets, and their expected rates of return as at December 31, are shown below:

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets
%
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets
%
 Expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets
%
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets
%
 Expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets
%
 Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets
%
  Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets

%
 Expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets

%
 Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets

%
 Expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets

%
 Fair value
of scheme
assets

£m
 Proportion
of total
scheme
assets

%
 

Equities

  8.7    1,699    47    8.7    1,963    56    8.6    1,827    60    1,804    47    8.7    1,699    47    8.7    1,963    56  

Bonds

  3.7    1,722    47    4.4    1,318    38    4.5    1,069    35    1,715    45    3.7    1,722    47    4.4    1,318    38  

Other

  4.3    213    6    5.1    226    6    5.3    171    5    287    8    4.3    213    6    5.1    226    6  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  6.2    3,634    100    6.8    3,507    100    7.0    3,067    100    3,806    100    6.2    3,634    100    6.8    3,507    100  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The actual return on scheme assets for the year ended December 31, 20112012 was a £308 million gain (2011: £200 million gain (2010:gain; 2010: £415 million gain; 2009: £490 million gain).

7.Pension schemes – (continued)

 

A summary of pension balances in respect of funded and unfunded schemes for the five years ended December 31, 20112012 is set out below:

 

 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2008
£m
 2007
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2008
£m
 

Fair value of scheme assets

  3,634    3,507    3,067    2,682    3,018    3,806    3,634    3,507    3,067    2,682  

Defined benefit obligations

  (3,876  (3,677  (3,302  (3,051  (2,968  (4,272  (3,876  (3,677  (3,302  (3,051
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net pension (obligations)/surplus

  (242  (170  (235  (369  50  

Net pension obligations

  (466  (242  (170  (235  (369
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gains and losses arising on the revaluation of pension scheme assets and liabilities that have been recognised in the statement of comprehensive income are set out below:

 

 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2008
£m
 2007
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2008
£m
 

Gains and losses during the year:

          

Experience (losses)/gains on scheme liabilities

  (27  (43  18    (9  (28  (32  (27  (43  18    (9

Experience (losses)/gains on scheme assets

  (35  198    301    (765  34  

Experience gains/(losses) on scheme assets

  87    (35  198    301    (765

Actuarial (losses)/gains arising on the present value of scheme liabilities due to changes in:

          

— discount rates

  (238  (162  (249  202    367    (552  (238  (162  (249  202  

— inflation

  182    (50  (124  198    (152  74    182    (50  (124  198  

— life expectancy and other actuarial assumptions

  5    (6  60    27    3  

— other actuarial assumptions

  94    5    (6  60    27  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  (113  (63  6    (347  224    (329  (113  (63  6    (347

Net cumulative (losses)/gains at start of year

  (152  (89  (95  252    28    (265  (152  (89  (95  252  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cumulative (losses)/gains at end of year

  (265  (152  (89  (95  252  

Net cumulative losses at end of year

  (594  (265  (152  (89  (95
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Regular contributions to defined benefit pension schemes in respect of 20122013 are expected to be approximately £60£55 million.

Sensitivity analysis

Valuation of Reed Elsevier’s pension scheme liabilities involves judgements about uncertain events, including the life expectancy of the members, salary and pension increases, inflation and the rate at which the future pension payments are discounted. Estimates are used for each of these factors. Differences arising from actual experience or future changes in assumptions may materially affect future pension charges. In particular, changes in assumptions for discount rates, inflation and life expectancies would have the following approximate effects on the annual net pension expenseservice cost and the defined benefit pension obligations:

 

   £m 

Increase/decrease of 0.25% in discount rate:

  

Decrease/increase in annual net pension expenseservice cost

   35  

Decrease/increase in defined benefit pension obligations

   168195  

Increase/decrease of one year in assumed life expectancy:

  

Increase/decrease in annual net pension expenseservice cost

   51  

Increase/decrease in defined benefit pension obligations

   94104  

Increase/decrease of 0.25% in the expected inflation rate:

  

Increase/decrease in annual net pension expenseservice cost

   73  

Increase/decrease in defined benefit pension obligations

   144113  

Additionally, the annual net pension expense includes an expected return on scheme assets. A 5% increase/decrease in the market value of equity investments held by the defined benefit pension schemes would, absent any change in their expected long term rate of return, increase/decrease the amount of the expected return on scheme assets by £7 million and would decrease/increase the amount of the net pension obligations by £85 million.

8.Share based remuneration

Reed Elsevier provides a number of share based remuneration schemes to directors and employees. The principal share based remuneration schemes are the Executive Share Option Schemes (ESOS), the Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), the Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP), the Retention Share Plan (RSP) and the Bonus Investment Plan (BIP). Share options granted under ESOS and LTIP are exercisable after three years and up to ten years from the date of grant at a price equivalent to the market value of the respective shares at the date of grant. Conditional shares granted under ESOS, LTIP, RSP and BIP are exercisable after three years for nil consideration if conditions are met. Conditional shares granted under REGP are exercisable for nil consideration if conditions are met after three and five years. Other awards principally relate to all employee share based saving schemes in the UK and the Netherlands.

Share based remuneration awards are, other than upon retirement or in exceptional circumstances, subject to the condition that the employee remains in employment at the time of exercise. Share options and conditional shares granted under LTIP, RSP and BIP in 2009 and prior years are subject to the achievement of growth targets of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV adjusted earnings per share measured at constant exchange rates. LTIP grants made in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are also variable subject to the achievement of an additional total shareholder return performance target.

Conditional shares granted under LTIP, REGP, RSP and BIP in 2010, 2011 and 20112012 are subject to the achievement of growth targets of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV adjusted earnings per share measured at constant exchange rates as well as the achievement of a targeted percentage return on invested capital of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. LTIP grants in 2010, 2011 and 20112012 and REGP grants in 2010 are also variable subject to the achievement of a total shareholder return performance target.

The weighted average fair value per award is based on full vesting on achievement of non market related performance conditions and stochastic models for market related components. The conditional shares and option awards are recognised in the income statement over the vesting period, being between three and five years, on the basis of expected performance against the non market related conditions, with the fair value related to market related components unchanging.

8.Share based remuneration – (continued)

 

20112012 grants

 

  

In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC

ordinary shares

   In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
   

In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares

  

In respect of Reed Elsevier NV

ordinary shares

  

Number

of shares

’000

  Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   

Number

of shares

’000

  

Weighted

average

fair value

per award

£

  

Number

of shares

’000

  

Weighted

average

fair value

per award

£

Share options

                

ESOS

  2,053   0.98     1,372     1.41    1,801  0.90  1,263  1.20

Other

  633   1.03     381     0.97    702  1.04  293  0.95
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total share options

  2,686   0.99     1,753     1.32    2,503  0.94  1,556  1.15
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Conditional shares

                

ESOS

  755   4.85     504     6.91    797  4.60  560  6.41

LTIP

  1,822   4.56     1,217     6.65    1,807  4.45  1,144  6.13

RSP

  322   4.73     5     7.15    256  6.00  5  7.82

BIP

  1,339   5.43     607     8.00    1,542  5.20  696  7.41
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total conditional shares

  4,238   4.90     2,333     7.06    4,402  4.83  2,405  6.57
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

2010 grants  
2011 grants2011 grants
  

In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC

ordinary shares

   In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
   

In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC

ordinary shares

  

In respect of Reed Elsevier NV

ordinary shares

  

Number

of shares

’000

  Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   

Number

of shares

’000

  

Weighted

average

fair value

per award

£

  

Number

of shares

’000

  

Weighted

average

fair value

per award

£

Share options

                

ESOS

  2,204   0.77     1,448     1.08    2,053  0.98  1,372  1.41

Other

  846   0.99     381     0.82    633  1.03  381  0.97
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total share options

  3,050   0.83     1,829     1.02    2,686  0.99  1,753  1.32
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Conditional shares

                

ESOS

  751   4.23     493     6.37    755  4.85  504  6.91

LTIP

  1,677   4.01     1,101     6.11    1,822  4.56  1,217  6.65

REGP

  1,038   6.99     681     10.66  

RSP

  236   4.23     155     6.37    322  4.73  5  7.15

BIP

  1,714   4.64     820     6.93    1,339  5.43  607  8.00
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total conditional shares

  5,416   4.82     3,250     7.32    4,238  4.90  2,333  7.06
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

8.Share based remuneration – (continued)

 

20092010 grants

 

  In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
   In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
   In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
   In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
  Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
   Number
of shares
’000
   Weighted
average
fair value
per award
£
 

Share options

                

ESOS

   4,303     0.93     2,799     1.44     2,204     0.77     1,448     1.08  

Other

   1,284     1.25     588     0.87     846     0.99     381     0.82  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total share options

   5,587     1.00     3,387     1.34     3,050     0.83     1,829     1.02  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Conditional shares

                

ESOS

   770     4.91     500     7.52     751     4.23     493     6.37  

LTIP

   1,845     6.26     1,198     9.73     1,677     4.01     1,101     6.11  

REGP

   1,038     6.99     681     10.66  

RSP

   204     4.95     133     7.58     236     4.23     155     6.37  

BIP

   661     4.48     352     6.48     1,714     4.64     820     6.93  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total conditional shares

   3,480     5.55     2,183     8.57     5,416     4.82     3,250     7.32  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The main assumptions used to determine the fair values are set out below.below:

Assumptions for grants made during the year

 

  In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
 In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
   In respect of Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
 In respect of Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
  2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 

Weighted average share price at date of grant

              

ESOS

  £5.39   £4.69   £5.39   8.97   8.36   9.35    £5.19   £5.39   £4.69   9.07   8.97   8.36  

LTIP

  £5.31   £4.67   £5.44   8.89   8.31   9.50    £5.25   £5.31   £4.67   8.91   8.89   8.31  

REGP

   £4.67     8.31       £4.67     8.31  

RSP

  £5.26   £4.67   £5.42   9.27   8.33   9.42    £6.00   £5.26   £4.67   9.65   9.27   8.33  

BIP

  £5.43   £4.64   £4.91   9.21   8.11   8.05    £5.20   £5.43   £4.64   9.15   9.21   8.11  

Other

  £5.13   £5.22   £5.02   9.03   8.86   8.31    £5.49   £5.13   £5.22   9.63   9.03   8.86  

Expected share price volatility

   29  26  26  29  26  26   30  29  26  30  29  26

Expected option life

   4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years     4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years    4 years  

Expected dividend yield

   3.6  3.5  3.1  4.1  3.9  3.4   3.9  3.6  3.5  4.5  4.1  3.9

Risk free interest rate

   1.9  1.8  2.0  2.5  1.2  2.4   0.8  1.9  1.8  0.9  2.5  1.2

Expected lapse rate

   2-5  3-5  3-5  2-4  3-4  3-4   2-5  2-5  3-5  2-4  2-4  3-4

Expected share price volatility has been estimated based on relevant historic data in respect of the Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share prices. Expected share option life has been estimated based on historical exercise patterns in respect of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV share options.

8.Share based remuneration – (continued)

 

The share based remuneration awards outstanding as at December 31, 20112012 in respect of both Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares are set out below.below:

 

 In respect of Reed
Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
 In respect of Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
 Total Total  In respect of Reed
Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
 In respect of Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
 
 Number
of shares
’000
 Weighted
average
exercise
price
(pence)
 Number
of shares
’000
 Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
  Number
of shares
under
option
’000
 Weighted
average
exercise
price
(pence)
 Number
of shares
under
option
’000
 Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
 

Share options

        

Outstanding at January 1, 2009

  35,128    549    25,977    12.11  

Granted

  5,587    508    3,387    9.17  

Exercised

  (1,217  424    (32  7.93  

Forfeited

  (2,216  549    (1,579  11.84  

Expired

  (1,597  518    (1,836  11.94  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

  35,685    547    25,917    11.74    35,685    547    25,917    11.74  

Granted

  3,050    455    1,829    8.45    3,050    455    1,829    8.45  

Exercised

  (2,008  470    (184  8.63    (2,008  470    (184  8.63  

Forfeited

  (1,355  496    (1,008  8.75    (1,355  496    (1,008  8.75  

Expired

  (1,661  554    (1,721  6.71    (1,661  554    (1,721  6.71  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

  33,711    544    24,833    11.45    33,711    544    24,833    11.45  

Granted

  2,686    509    1,753    8.99    2,686    509    1,753    8.99  

Exercised

  (1,626  493    (201  8.84    (1,626  493    (201  8.84  

Forfeited

  (2,001  479    (1,941  10.94    (2,001  479    (1,941  10.94  

Expired

  (3,230  640    (2,803  8.68    (3,230  640    (2,803  8.68  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

  29,540    534    21,641    10.99  

Exercisable at December 31, 2009

  23,371    540    19,517    11.79  

Outstanding at January 1, 2012

  29,540    534    21,641    10.99  

Granted

  2,503    497    1,556    9.19  

Exercised

  (6,694  497    (1,913  9.36  

Forfeited

  (1,022  498    (581  9.33  

Expired

  (4,992  592    (5,121  12.34  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

  19,335    529    15,582    10.63  

Exercisable at December 31, 2010

  22,048    552    18,735    11.88    22,048    552    18,735    11.88  

Exercisable at December 31, 2011

  20,061    552    16,876    11.56    20,061    552    16,876    11.56  

Exercisable at December 31, 2012

  12,573    553    12,329    11.12  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

   Number of Reed
Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
(’000)
  Number of Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
(’000)
 

Conditional shares

   

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

   8,148    4,921  

Granted

   5,416    3,250  

Vested

   (678  (425

Forfeited

   (849  (453
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

   12,037    7,293  

Granted

   4,238    2,332  

Vested

   (580  (383

Forfeited

   (1,799  (975
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2012

   13,896    8,267  

Granted

   4,402    2,405  

Vested

   (601  (391

Forfeited

   (5,885  (3,575
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

   11,812    6,706  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

8.Share based remuneration – (continued)

 

   Number of Reed
Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
(’000)
  Number of Reed
Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
(’000)
 
   Total  Total 

Conditional shares

   

Outstanding at January 1, 2009

   8,503    5,198  

Granted

   3,480    2,183  

Vested

   (3,280  (2,074

Forfeited

   (555  (386
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

   8,148    4,921  

Granted

   5,416    3,250  

Vested

   (678  (425

Forfeited

   (849  (453
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

   12,037    7,293  

Granted

   4,238    2,332  

Vested

   (580  (383

Forfeited

   (1,799  (975
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

   13,896    8,267  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of share options and vesting of conditional shares during 20112012 was 554p (2010: 522p; 2009: 506p)593p (2011: 554p; 2010: 522p) for Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and €9.71 (2010: €8.82; 2009: €8.45)€10.43 (2011: €9.71; 2010: €8.82) for Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.

Range of exercise prices for outstanding share options

 

  2011  2010  2009 
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
 

Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (pence)

      

351-400

                  16    0.3  

401-450

  2,148    2.9    2,017    3.3    2,157    2.6  

451-500

  7,793    3.6    8,919    4.5    8,219    2.9  

501-550

  11,662    5.5    11,299    5.6    12,638    6.0  

551-600

  2,726    0.8    3,153    1.6    3,593    2.3  

601-650

  5,176    5.7    6,053    6.6    6,600    7.6  

651-700

  35    0.3    2,270    0.2    2,462    1.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  29,540    4.4    33,711    4.6    35,685    4.3  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (euro)

      

7.01-8.00

  120    7.2    137    8.2    175    9.2  

8.01-9.00

  3,233    8.6    2,062    9.0    511    9.0  

9.01-10.00

  3,686    5.3    3,915    6.0    4,011    6.8  

10.01-11.00

  3,921    2.3    4,385    3.3    4,912    4.4  

11.01-12.00

  4,865    3.5    5,670    4.4    6,297    5.1  

12.01-13.00

  2,339    6.0    2,653    6.8    2,854    7.4  

13.01-14.00

  2,025    0.5    2,502    1.4    2,990    2.5  

14.01-15.00

  1,426    5.1    3,414    3.2    3,971    4.0  

15.01-16.00

  26    0.3    95    0.8    196    1.3  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  21,641    4.5    24,833    3.9    25,917    5.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

8.Share based remuneration – (continued)

  2012  2011  2010 
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
  Number of
shares
under
option
’000
  Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
 

Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares (pence)

      

401-450

  1,925    2.8    2,148    2.9    2,017    3.3  

451-500

  4,415    3.5    7,793    3.6    8,919    4.5  

501-550

  8,981    5.7    11,662    5.5    11,299    5.6  

551-600

  189    5.4    2,726    0.8    3,153    1.6  

601-650

  3,825    4.8    5,176    5.7    6,053    6.6  

651-700

          35    0.3    2,270    0.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  19,335    4.7    29,540    4.4    33,711    4.6  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (euro)

      

7.01-8.00

  58    6.1    120    7.2    137    8.2  

8.01-9.00

  2,736    7.7    3,233    8.6    2,062    9.0  

9.01-10.00

  3,142    6.9    3,686    5.3    3,915    6.0  

10.01-11.00

  2,697    1.6    3,921    2.3    4,385    3.3  

11.01-12.00

  3,982    2.6    4,865    3.5    5,670    4.4  

12.01-13.00

  1,806    5.1    2,339    6.0    2,653    6.8  

13.01-14.00

  118    4.1    2,025    0.5    2,502    1.4  

14.01-15.00

  1,043    4.1    1,426    5.1    3,414    3.2  

15.01-16.00

          26    0.3    95    0.8  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  15,582    4.6    21,641    4.5    24,833    3.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Share options are expected, upon exercise, to be met principally by the issue of new ordinary shares but may also be met from shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) (see note 31). Conditional shares will be met from shares held by the EBT.

 

9.Net finance costs

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Interest on short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper

   (28  (33  (63   (27  (28  (33

Interest on other loans

   (212  (236  (226   (196  (212  (236

Interest on obligations under finance leases

   (1  (1  (1   (1  (1  (1
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total borrowing costs

   (241  (270  (290   (224  (241  (270

Losses on loans and derivatives not designated as hedges

   (11  (14  (8   (8  (11  (14
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Finance costs

   (252  (284  (298   (232  (252  (284
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest on bank deposits

   12    7    5     7    12    7  

Gains on loans and derivatives not designated as hedges

   5    1    2     9    5    1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Finance income

   17    8    7     16    17    8  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net finance costs

   (235  (276  (291   (216  (235  (276
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

9.Net finance costs – (continued)

Finance costs include £16 million (2011: £15 million (2010:million; 2010: £26 million; 2009: £46 million) transferred from the hedge reserve. A net loss of £2 million (2011: £3 million (2010:million; 2010: £15 million; 2009: £11 million) on interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges was recognised directly in equity in the hedge reserve to be recognised in future periods.

 

10.Disposals and other non operating items

 

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

Revaluation of held for trading investments

   6    8    8  

Loss on disposal of businesses

   (28  (54  (69
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss on disposals and other non operating items

   (22  (46  (61
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

Revaluation of held for trading investments

   19    6    8  

Property provisions on disposed businesses

   (60  (16  (22

Gain/(loss) on disposal of businesses and assets held for sale

   86    (12  (32
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net gain/(loss) on disposals and other non operating items

   45    (22  (46
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

11.Taxation

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Current tax

        

United Kingdom

   64    44    44     73    64    44  

The Netherlands

   87    58    37     68    87    58  

Rest of world

   107    64    (1   12    107    64  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current tax charge

   258    166    80     153    258    166  

Deferred tax

   (77  (46  (40   (40  (77  (46
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total taxation charge

   181    120    40  

Tax expense

   113    181    120  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The net tax expense charged on profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average of tax rates applicable to accounting profits and losses of the consolidated entities, as follows:

   2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

Profit before tax

   1,187    948    768  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax at average applicable rates

   255    180    118  

Tax on share of results of joint ventures

   (7  (9  (9

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes

   30    26    24  

(Non-taxable)/non-deductible costs of share based remuneration

   (3  3    2  

(Non-taxable)/non-deductible disposal related gains and losses

   (69  7    1  

Tax losses of the period not recognised

   6    4      

Recognition and utilization of tax losses that arose in prior years

   (6  (22  (6

Exceptional prior year tax credit

   (96        

Other adjustments in respect of prior periods

   2    (7  (9

Deferred tax effect of changes in tax rates

   1    (1  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax expense

   113    181    120  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax expense as a percentage of profit before tax

   10  19  16
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The weighted average applicable tax rate for the year was 22% (2011: 19%, 2010: 16%). This increase is caused by a change in the relative profitability of the consolidated entities in the countries in which they operate, partially offset by the impact of the reduction in the tax rate of the United Kingdom (see below).

During 2012, Reed Elsevier resolved a number of significant prior year tax matters and reassessed its exposure to other tax matters across the jurisdiction in which Reed Elsevier operates. As a result of this reassessment, current tax charge includes aliabilities were reduced by £96 million to reflect the lower cash tax credit of nil (2010: £7 million; 2009: £34 million) in respect of prior year disposals.expected to be payable.

11.Taxation – (continued)

 

A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on average applicable rates of tax (weighted in proportion to accounting profits) to the actual total tax expense is set out below.

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

Profit before tax

   948    768    435  

Tax at average applicable rates

   180    118    41  

Tax on share of results of joint ventures

   (9  (7  (6

Prior year credits on disposals

       (7  (34

Non deductible goodwill impairment

           19  

Non deductible loss on disposals

   4    10      

Net tax on share based remuneration

   3    2    10  

Non deductible amounts and other items

   3    4    10  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax expense

   181    120    40  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax expense as a percentage of profit before tax

   19  16  9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following tax has been recognisedrecognized directly in equity during the year.year:

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Tax on actuarial movements on defined benefit pension schemes

   36     16     (10   102    36     16  

Tax on fair value movements on cash flow hedges

   5     12     (15   (19  5     12  

Deferred tax credits on share based remuneration

   1     1       

Tax credits on share based remuneration

   5    1     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net tax credit/(charge) recognised directly in equity

   42     29     (25   88    42     29  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

A number of changes in the UK corporation tax system, including reductions of the main rate of corporation tax from 26% to 24% with effect from April 1, 2012, and from 24% to 23% with effect from April 1, 2013, were substantively enacted on July 3, 2012. Reed Elsevier has therefore remeasured its UK deferred tax assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period at 23%, which has resulted in recognition of a deferred tax debit of £1 million in the income statement. The UK government has also announced an intention to reduce the rate of corporation tax to 21% by April 1, 2014, but as this change had not been substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position, the effect on deferred tax has not been recognized in these financial statements. It is not currently anticipated that the proposed reduction in rate would have a significant impact on deferred tax balances.

 

12.Statement of cash flows

Reconciliation of profit before tax to cash generated from operations

 

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

Profit before tax

   948    768    435  

Disposals and other non operating items

   22    46    61  

Net finance costs

   235    276    291  

Share of results of joint ventures

   (30  (22  (15

Amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill

   355    345    533  

Amortisation of internally developed intangible assets

   132    158    139  

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

   75    79    84  

Share based remuneration

   27    (7  17  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non cash items

   589    575    773  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Decrease in inventories and pre-publication costs

   32    35    47  

(Increase)/decrease in receivables

   (37  24    112  

Decrease in payables

   (24  (53  (100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Increase)/decrease in working capital

   (29  6    59  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash generated from operations

   1,735    1,649    1,604  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

12.Statement of cash flow – (continued)

   2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

Profit before tax

   1,187    948    768  

Disposals and other non operating items

   (45  22    46  

Net finance costs

   216    235    276  

Share of results of joint ventures

   (24  (30  (22
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit before joint ventures

   1,334    1,175    1,068  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

   328    355    345  

Amortisation of internally developed intangible assets

   151    132    158  

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

   76    75    79  

Share based remuneration

   31    27    (7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non cash items

   586    589    575  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Decrease in inventories and pre-publication costs

   21    32    35  

Decrease/(increase) in receivables

   4    (37  24  

Decrease in payables

   (98  (24  (53
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Increase)/decrease in working capital

   (73  (29  6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash generated from operations

   1,847    1,735    1,649  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Cash flow on acquisitions

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Purchase of businesses

   13     (455  (38  (9   13     (276  (455  (38

Investment in joint ventures

     (1��            (10  (1    

Deferred payments relating to prior year acquisitions

     (25  (12  (85     (30  (25  (12
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

     (481  (50  (94     (316  (481  (50
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents include £4 million (2010: £4 million; 2009: £5 million) held in trust to satisfy liabilities in respect of change of control obligations related to the acquisition of ChoicePoint.

13.Acquisitions

Acquisitions in 2012

During the year a number of acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £341 million, after taking account of net cash acquired of £12 million. The net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. The provisional fair values of the consideration given and of the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below:

Fair value
£m

Goodwill

165

Intangible assets

229

Property, plant and equipment

1

Current assets

21

Current liabilities

(61

Current tax

2

Deferred tax

(16

Net assets acquired

341

Consideration (after taking account of £12 million net cash acquired)

341

Less: consideration deferred to future years

(23

Less: acquisition date fair value of equity interest

(42

Net cash flow

276

Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of the business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled workforces, and acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed Elsevier. In addition, goodwill arises on the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets, for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.

The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired are provisional pending the completion of the valuation exercises. Final fair values will be incorporated in the 2013 combined financial statements. There were no significant adjustments to the provisional fair values of prior year acquisitions established in 2011.

The businesses acquired in 2012 contributed £73 million to revenue, decreased net profit by £10 million and contributed £2 million to net cash inflow from operating activities for the part year under Reed Elsevier ownership and before taking account of acquisition financing costs. Had the businesses been acquired at the beginning of the year, on a proforma basis the Reed Elsevier revenues and net profit for the year would have been £6,153 million and £1,073 million respectively, before taking account of acquisition financing costs.

Acquisitions in 2011

During the year a number of acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £492 million, after taking account of net cash acquired of £24 million, the most significant of which was the acquisition of Accuity Inc. for £331 million, net of cash acquired, which completed on November 1, 2011.

13.Acquisitions – (continued)

The net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. The provisional fair values of the consideration given and of the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below.below:

 

   Fair value
£m
 

Goodwill

   300  

Intangible assets

   311  

Property, plant and equipment

   1  

Current assets

   23  

Current liabilities

   (46

Borrowings

   (18

Current tax

   (1

Deferred tax

   (78
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   492  
  

 

 

 

Consideration (after taking account of £24 million net cash acquired)

   492  

Less: consideration deferred to future years

   (27

Less: acquisition date fair value of equity interest

   (10
  

 

 

 

Net cash flow

   455  
  

 

 

 

Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of the business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled workforces, and acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed Elsevier. In addition, goodwill arises on the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets, for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.

The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired are provisional pending the completion of the valuation exercises. Final fair values will be incorporated in the 2012 combined financial statements. ThereIn 2011, there were no significant adjustments to the provisional fair values of prior year acquisitions established in 2010.

The businesses acquired in 2011 contributed £34 million to revenue, decreased net profit attributable by £10 million and contributed £7 million to net cash inflow from operating activities for the part year under Reed Elsevier ownership and before taking account of acquisition financing costs. Had the businesses been acquired at the beginning of the year, on a proforma basis the Reed Elsevier revenues and net profit attributable for the year would have been £6,065 million and £771 million respectively, before taking account of acquisition financing costs.

13.Acquisitions – (continued)

Acquisitions in 2010

During the year a number of small acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £43 million, after taking account of net cash acquired of nil.

The net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. The fair values of the consideration given and of the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below.

 

   Fair value
£m
 

Goodwill

   27  

Intangible assets

   27  

Current liabilities

   (2

Deferred tax

   (9
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   43  
  

 

 

 

Consideration (after taking account of nil net cash acquired)

   43  

Less: consideration deferred to future years

   (5
  

 

 

 

Net cash flow

   38  
  

 

 

 

13.Acquisitions – (continued)

Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of the business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled workforces, acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed Elsevier. In addition, goodwill arises on the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.

Acquisitions in 2009

During 2009 a number of small acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £11 million, after taking account of net cash acquired of £3 million.

The net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. The fair values of the consideration given and the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below:

Fair value
£m

Goodwill

6

Intangible assets

17

Current liabilities

(11

Deferred tax

(1

Net assets acquired

11

Consideration (after taking account of £3 million net cash acquired)

11

Less: consideration deferred to future years

(2

Net cash flow

9

Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of the business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled workforces and acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed Elsevier. In addition, goodwill arises on the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.

14.Equity dividends

Ordinary dividends declared in the year

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Reed Elsevier PLC

           248             245             228     264     248     245  

Reed Elsevier NV

   251     240     232     259     251     240  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   499     485     460     523     499     485  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Ordinary dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise: a 20102011 final dividend of 15.0p15.9p and a 20112012 interim dividend of 5.65p6.0p giving a total of 20.65p (2010: 20.4p; 2009:21.9p (2011: 20.65p; 2010: 20.4p) for Reed Elsevier PLC; and a 20102011 final dividend of €0.303€0.326 and a 20112012 interim dividend of €0.110€0.13 giving a total of €0.413 (2010: €0.402; 2009: €0.397)€0.456 (2011: €0.413; 2010: €0.402) for Reed Elsevier NV.

The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC have proposed a final dividend of 15.9p (2010: 15.0p; 2009:17.0p (2011: 15.9p; 2010: 15.0p). The directors of Reed Elsevier NV have proposed a final dividend of €0.326 (2010: €0.303; 2009: €0.293)€0.337 (2011: €0.326; 2010: €0.303). The total cost of funding the proposed final dividends is expected to be £390£391 million, for which no liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.

Ordinary dividends paid and proposed relating to the financial year

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
  2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Reed Elsevier PLC

   259     245     245    273   259     245  

Reed Elsevier NV

   265     246     250    262   265     246  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   524     491     495    535   524     491  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Dividends paid to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level inclusive of the UK tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The cost of funding the Reed Elsevier PLC dividends is therefore similar to that of Reed Elsevier NV.

 

15.Goodwill

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   4,441    4,339    4,901     4,729    4,441    4,339  

Acquisitions

   300    27    6     165    300    27  

Disposals/reclassified (to)/from held for sale

   (26  (38  15  

Impairment

           (110

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

   (152  (26  (38

Exchange translation differences

   14    113    (473   (197  14    113  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   4,729    4,441    4,339     4,545    4,729    4,441  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The carrying amount of goodwill is after cumulative amortisation of £1,332£20 million (2010: £1,407 million; 2009: £1,573 million) which was charged prior to the adoption of IFRS, and(2011: £49 million (2010: £58 million) of subsequent impairment charges.

Impairment charges in 2009 comprise £93 million in Reed Business Information, principally relating to its US and International businesses, and £17 million in Reed Exhibitions, principally in Reed Exhibitions Continental Europe.
15.Goodwill – (continued)

Impairment review

Impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is performed at least annually based on cash generating units (CGUs). A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other groups of assets. Goodwill impairment testing is performed on the basis of 2422 CGUs. CGUs which are not individually significant have been aggregated for presentation purposes. Typically, when an acquisition is made the acquired business is fully integrated into the relevant business unit and CGU, and the goodwill arising is allocated to the CGUs, or groups of CGUs, that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition.

15.Goodwill – (continued)

The carrying value of goodwill recorded in the major groups of CGUs is set out below.below:

 

   2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
 

Elsevier

   991     994     963  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

   1,733     1,720     1,659  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LexisNexis Legal & Professional US

   1,070     1,064     1,012  

LexisNexis Legal & Professional International

   113     115     133  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LexisNexis Legal & Professional

   1,183     1,179     1,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Exhibitions Continental Europe

   289     293     304  

Reed Exhibitions other

   76     66     60  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Exhibitions

   365     359     364  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Business Information US

   52     63     73  

Reed Business Information UK

   352     71     69  

Reed Business Information NL

   23     24     29  

Reed Business Information International

   30     31     37  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Business Information

   457     189     208  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   4,729     4,441     4,339  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Scientific, Technical & Medical

   1,026     991     994  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Risk Solutions

   1,559     1,733     1,720  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Business Information US

   50     52     63  

Business Information UK

   335     352     71  

Business Information NL

   23     23     24  

Business Information International

        30     31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Business Information

   408     457     189  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Legal US

   1,038     1,070     1,064  

Legal International

   112     113     115  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Legal 

   1,150     1,183     1,179  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exhibitions Continental Europe

   273     289     293  

Exhibitions other

   129     76     66  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exhibitions

   402     365     359  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   4,545     4,729     4,441  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Elsevier’s goodwill impairment testing methodology, assumptions and sensitivity analysis are disclosed within critical judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty on pages F-14 to F-16.

16.Intangible assets

 

  Market
and
customer
related
£m
 Content,
software
and
other
£m
 Total
acquired
intangible
assets
£m
 Internally
developed
intangible
assets
£m
 Total
£m
   Market
and
customer
related
£m
 Content,
software
and
other
£m
 Total
acquired
intangible
assets

£m
 Internally
developed
intangible
assets

£m
 Total
£m
 

Cost

            

At January 1, 2009

   2,819    3,935    6,754    940    7,694  

At January 1, 2010

   2,535    3,390    5,925    1,042    6,967  

Acquisitions

   5    12    17        17     11    16    27        27  

Additions

               179    179                 230    230  

Disposals/reclassified (to)/from held for sale

   (1  (247  (248  1    (247

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

       (99  (99  (77  (176

Exchange translation differences

   (288  (310  (598  (78  (676   85    44    129    9    138  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At January 1, 2010

   2,535    3,390    5,925    1,042    6,967  

At January 1, 2011

   2,631    3,351    5,982    1,204    7,186  

Acquisitions

   11    16    27        27     196    115    311        311  

Additions

               230    230                 270    270  

Disposals

       (99  (99  (77  (176   (38  (189  (227  (51  (278

Exchange translation differences

   85    44    129    9    138     13    (14  (1  (1  (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At January 1, 2011

   2,631    3,351    5,982    1,204    7,186  

At January 1, 2012

   2,802    3,263    6,065    1,422    7,487  

Acquisitions

   196    115    311        311     201    27    228    1    229  

Additions

               270    270                 261    261  

Disposals/reclassified (to)/from held for sale

   (38  (189  (227  (51  (278

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

   (56  (97  (153  (114  (267

Exchange translation differences

   13    (14  (1  (1  (2   (131  (103  (234  (53  (287
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2011

   2,802    3,263    6,065    1,422    7,487  

At December 31, 2012

   2,816    3,090    5,906    1,517    7,423  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Amortisation and impairment

      

At January 1, 2009

   310    2,415    2,725    565    3,290  

Charge for the year

   155    209    364    139    503  

Impairment

   7    52    59        59  

Disposals/reclassified (to)/from held for sale

   (1  (225  (226  (18  (244

Exchange translation differences

   (34  (191  (225  (48  (273
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

      

At January 1, 2010

   437    2,260    2,697    638    3,335     437    2,260    2,697    638    3,335  

Charge for the year

   161    184    345    158    503     161    184    345    158    503  

Disposals

       (93  (93  (64  (157       (93  (93  (64  (157

Exchange translation differences

   12    33    45    3    48     12    33    45    3    48  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At January 1, 2011

   610    2,384    2,994    735    3,729     610    2,384    2,994    735    3,729  

Charge for the year

   160    195    355    132    487     160    195    355    132    487  

Disposals/reclassified (to)/from held for sale

   (30  (149  (179  (36  (215

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

   (30  (149  (179  (36  (215

Exchange translation differences

   4    (8  (4  (4  (8   4    (8  (4  (4  (8
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2011

   744    2,422    3,166    827    3,993  

At January 1, 2012

   744    2,422    3,166    827    3,993  

Charge for the year

   173    155    328    151    479  

Disposals

   (11  (89  (100  (79  (179

Exchange translation differences

   (36  (80  (116  (29  (145
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2012

   870    2,408    3,278    870    4,148  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net book amount

            

At December 31, 2009

   2,098    1,130    3,228    404    3,632  

At December 31, 2010

   2,021    967    2,988    469    3,457     2,021    967    2,988    469    3,457  

At December 31, 2011

   2,058    841    2,899    595    3,494     2,058    841    2,899    595    3,494  

At December 31, 2012

   1,946    682    2,628    647    3,275  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

16.Intangible assets – (continued)

 

Intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations comprise: market related assets (e.g. trademarks, imprints, brands); customer related assets (e.g. subscription bases, customer lists, customer relationships); and content, software and other intangible assets (e.g. editorial content, software and product delivery systems, other publishing rights, exhibition rights and supply contracts). Included in content, software and other acquired intangible assets are assets with a net book value of £431 million (2011: £531 million (2010:million; 2010: £619 million; 2009: £698 million) that arose on acquisitions completed prior to the adoption of IFRS that have not been allocated to specific categories of intangible assets. Internally developed intangible assets typically comprise software and systems development where an identifiable asset is created that is probable to generate future economic benefits.

Included in market and customer related intangible assets are £354 million (2011: £370 million (2010:million; 2010: £368 million; 2009: £356 million) of brands and imprints relating to ElsevierScientific, Technical & Medical determined to have indefinite lives based on an assessment of their historical longevity and stable market positions. Indefinite lived intangibles are tested for impairment at least annually using the same value in use assumptions as set out in critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty on pages F-14 to F-16.

Impairment chargesAlso included in 2009 comprise amountsmarket and customer related intangible assets are £1,037 million (2011: £1,209 million; 2010: £1,274 million) of £10 millioncustomer relationship assets arising on the acquisition of ChoicePoint in Reed Exhibitions, and £49 million in Reed Business Information’s US and International businesses.2008 with a remaining useful economic life of approximately 16 years.

 

17.Investments

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Investments in joint ventures

   124     136     135     100     124     136  

Available for sale investments

   8     10     9     3     8     10  

Venture capital investments held for trading

   56     38     32     76     56     38  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   188     184     176     179     188     184  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The value of venture capital investments held for trading, determined by reference to quoted market prices, amounted to £27 million (2011: £17 million (2010:million; 2010: £12 million; 2009: £11 million). The value of other venture capital investments and available for sale investments has been determined by reference to other observable market inputs.

An analysis of changes in the carrying value of investments in joint ventures is set out below:

 

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

At January 1

   136    135    145  

Share of results of joint ventures

   30    22    15  

Dividends received from joint ventures

   (33  (24  (23

Disposals

   (6  (1    

Additions

   1          

Exchange translation differences

   (4  4    (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31

   124    136    135  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Share of results of joint ventures includes impairment charges of nil (2010: nil; 2009: £8 million) in respect of minor joint ventures in Reed Exhibitions.

   2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

At January 1

   124    136    135  

Share of results of joint ventures

   24    30    22  

Dividends received from joint ventures

   (20  (33  (24

Disposals and transfers

   (33  (6  (1

Additions

   10    1      

Exchange translation differences

   (5  (4  4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31

   100    124    136  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The principal joint ventures at December 31, 20112012 are exhibition joint ventures within Reed Exhibitions and Giuffrè (an Italian legal publisher in which Reed Elsevier has a 40% shareholding) within LexisNexis Legal & Professional.

17.Investments – (continued)

Legal.

Summarised aggregate information in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier’s share is set out below.below:

 

  Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier share   Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier share 
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Revenue

   254    235    246    128    116    118     187    254    235    91    128    116  

Net profit for the year

   62    46    51    30    22    15     45    62    46    24    30    22  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

   255    264    284    122    122    133     227    255    264    104    122    122  

Total liabilities

   (137  (132  (152  (66  (62  (73   (126  (137  (132  (59  (66  (62
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets

   118    132    132    56    60    60     101    118    132    45    56    60  
  

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

    

Goodwill

      68    76    75        55    68    76  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

      124    136    135        100    124    136  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

18.Property, plant and equipment

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
 Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
 Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
  Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
 Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
 Land
and
buildings
£m
 Fixtures
and
equipment
£m
 Total
£m
 

Cost

                  

At January 1

  246    578    824    238    626    864    259    644    903    238    582    820    246    578    824    238    626    864  

Acquisitions

      1    1                                1    1        1    1              

Capital expenditure

  8    82    90    7    78    85    10    68    78    10    70    80    8    82    90    7    78    85  

Disposals/reclassified
(to)/from held for sale

  (16  (78  (94  (5)    (141  (146  (8)    (36  (44

Disposals/reclassified
as held for sale

  (21  (97  (118  (16  (78  (94  (5  (141  (146

Exchange translation differences

      (1  (1  6    15    21    (23  (50  (73  (9  (19  (28      (1  (1  6    15    21  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

  238    582    820    246    578    824    238    626    864    218    537    755    238    582    820    246    578    824  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

                  

At January 1

  115    418    533    106    466    572    106    468    574    118    414    532    115    418    533    106    466    572  

Disposals/reclassified
(to)/from held for sale

  (6)    (69  (75  (5)    (127  (132  (2)    (38  (40

Disposals/reclassified
as held for sale

  (5  (94  (99  (6  (69  (75  (5  (127  (132

Charge for the year

  9    66    75    12    67    79    12    72    84    8    68    76    9    66    75    12    67    79  

Exchange translation differences

      (1  (1  2    12    14    (10  (36  (46  (5  (13  (18      (1  (1  2    12    14  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

  118    414    532    115    418    533    106    466    572    116    375    491    118    414    532    115    418    533  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net book amount

  120    168    288    131    160    291    132    160    292    102    162    264    120    168    288    131    160    291  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

No depreciation is provided on freehold land of £39 million (2011: £46 million (2010:million; 2010: £48 million; 2009: £50 million). The net book amount of property, plant and equipment at December 31, 20112012 includes £11 million (2011: £4 million (2010:million; 2010: £2 million; 2009: £4 million) in respect of assets held under finance leases relating to fixtures and equipment.

19.Financial instruments

The main financial risks faced by Reed Elsevier are liquidity risk, market risk — comprising interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk — and credit risk. Financial instruments are used to finance the Reed Elsevier businesses and to hedge interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Reed Elsevier’s businesses do not enter into speculative derivative transactions. Details of financial instruments subject to liquidity, market and credit risks are described below.

Liquidity risk

Reed Elsevier maintains a range of borrowing facilities and debt programmes to fund its requirements, at short notice and at competitive rates. The remaining contractual maturities for borrowings and derivative financial instruments are shown in the table below. The table shows undiscounted principal and interest cash flows and includes contractual gross cash flows to be exchanged as part of cross currency interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts where there is a legal right of set-off.

 

   Contractual cash flow    Contractual cash flow 

At December 31, 2011

 Carrying
amount
£m
 Within
1 year
£m
 1-2  Years
£m
 2-3  Years
£m
 3-4  Years
£m
 4-5  Years
£m
 More
than

5 Years
£m
 Total
£m
 

At December 31, 2012

 Carrying
amount

£m
 Within
1 year

£m
 1-2  Years
£m
 2-3  Years
£m
 3-4  Years
£m
 4-5  Years
£m
 More
than
5  Years

£m
 Total
£m
 

Borrowings

                

Fixed rate borrowings

  (3,568  (553  (814  (863  (248  (524  (1,694  (4,696  (3,695  (803  (797  (251  (530  (428  (1,940  (4,749

Floating rate borrowings

  (714  (646  (2  (2  (65  (1  (5  (721  (197  (132  (1  (63      (1  (3  (200

Derivative financial liabilities

                

Interest rate derivatives

  (10  (9  (3                  (12  (2  (3                  (5  (8

Cross currency interest rate swaps

      (6  (173  (189              (368      (166  (180                  (346

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  (59  (1,019  (421  (256              (1,696  (9  (1,382  (442  (194              (2,018

Derivative financial assets

                

Interest rate derivatives

  39    13    27    6    5    5    3    59    47    35    13    12    9    6        75  

Cross currency interest rate swaps

  99    14    208    248                470    93    202    243                    445  

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  11    987    414    252                1,653    55    1,400    460    202                2,062  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  (4,202  (1,219  (764  (804  (308  (520  (1,696  (5,311  (3,708  (849  (704  (294  (521  (423  (1,948  (4,739
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

19.Financial instruments – (continued)

 

   Contractual cash flow    Contractual cash flow 

At December 31, 2010

 Carrying
amount
£m
 Within
1 year
£m
 1-2  Years
£m
 2-3  Years
£m
 3-4  Years
£m
 4-5  Years
£m
 More than
5  Years
£m
 Total
£m
 

At December 31, 2011

 Carrying
amount
£m
 Within
1 year
£m
 1-2 Years
£m
 2-3 Years
£m
 3-4 Years
£m
 4-5 Years
£m
 More than
5 Years
£m
 Total
£m
 

Borrowings

                

Fixed rate borrowings

  (3,711  (370  (558  (833  (865  (246  (2,210  (5,082  (3,568  (553  (814  (863  (248  (524  (1,694  (4,696

Floating rate borrowings

  (591  (383  (53  (6  (99  (67  (5  (613  (714  (646  (2  (2  (65  (1  (5  (721

Derivative financial liabilities Interest rate derivatives

  (25  (19  (8  (2      (1  (6  (36  (10  (9  (3                  (12

Cross currency interest rate swaps

      (5  (7  (179  (190          (381      (6  (173  (189              (368

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  (55  (1,283  (413  (154  (32          (1,882  (59  (1,019  (421  (256              (1,696

Derivative financial assets Interest rate derivatives

  19    15    10    20                45    39    13    27    6    5    5    3    59  

Cross currency interest rate swaps

  100    14    14    209    248            485    99    14    208    248                470  

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  15    1,262    401    154    33            1,850    11    987    414    252                1,653  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  (4,248  (769  (614  (791  (905  (314  (2,221  (5,614  (4,202  (1,219  (764  (804  (308  (520  (1,696  (5,311
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

   Contractual cash flow    Contractual cash flow 

At December 31, 2009

 Carrying
amount
£m
 Within
1 year
£m
 1-2  Years
£m
 2-3  Years
£m
 3-4  Years
£m
 4-5  Years
£m
 More than
5  Years
£m
 Total
£m
 

At December 31, 2010

 Carrying
amount
£m
 Within
1 year
£m
 1-2 Years
£m
 2-3 Years
£m
 3-4 Years
£m
 4-5 Years
£m
 More than
5 Years
£m
 Total
£m
 

Borrowings

                

Fixed rate borrowings

  (3,824  (252  (592  (542  (837  (815  (2,409  (5,447  (3,711  (370  (558  (833  (865  (246  (2,210  (5,082

Floating rate borrowings

  (882  (673  (4  (115  (4  (100  (5  (901  (591  (383  (53  (6  (99  (67  (5  (613

Derivative financial liabilities Interest rate derivatives

  (45  (28  (12  (5  (3  (4  (12  (64  (25  (19  (8  (2      (1  (6  (36

Cross currency interest rate swaps

      (6  (10  (14  (183  (184      (397      (5  (7  (179  (190          (381

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  (57  (907  (378  (165              (1,450  (55  (1,283  (413  (154  (32          (1,882

Derivative financial assets Interest rate derivatives

  3    15    5        16            36    19    15    10    20                45  

Cross currency interest rate swaps

  54    12    13    15    192    217        449    100    14    14    209    248            485  

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  14    875    374    166                1,415    15    1,262    401    154    33            1,850  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  (4,737  (964  (604  (660  (819  (886  (2,426  (6,359  (4,248  (769  (614  (791  (905  (314  (2,221  (5,614
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The carrying amount of derivative financial liabilities comprises nil (2010: nil; 2009: £9 million) in relation to fair value hedges,£7 million (2011: £64 million (2010:million; 2010: £68 million; 2009: £67 million) in relation to cash flow hedges and £4 million (2011: £5 million (2010:million; 2010: £12 million; 2009: £26 million) not designated as hedges.hedging instruments. The carrying amount of derivative financial assets comprises £124 million (2011: £123 million (£105 million; 2009: £502010: £105 million) in relation to fair value hedges, £46 million (2011: £10 million (2010: £12 million; 2009:2010: £12 million) in relation to cash flow hedges and £25 million (2011: £16 million (2010million; 2010: £17 million; 2009: £9 million) not designated as hedges.hedging instruments.

At December 31, 2011,2012, Reed Elsevier had access to a $2,000 million committed bank facility maturing in June 2014,2015, which was undrawn. The bank facility, together with certain of Reed Elsevier’s private placements, are subject to financial covenants.covenants typical to Reed Elsevier’s size and financial strength. Reed Elsevier was in compliance with these covenants for the year ended December 31, 2011.2012. Financial covenants are not included in the terms and conditions of any outstanding public bonds.

19.Financial instruments – (continued)

 

After taking account of the maturity of committed bank facilities that back short term borrowings at December 31, 2011,2012, and after utilising available cash resources, no borrowings mature within one year (2010:two years (2011: nil; 2009:2010: nil), no borrowings mature in the second year (2010: nil; 2009: nil), 44%27% of borrowings mature in the third year (2010:(2011: 44%; 2010: 23%; 2009: 19%), 18%23% in the fourth and fifth years (2010:(2011: 18%; 2010: 27%; 2009: 35%), 27%39% in the sixth to tenth years (2010:(2011: 27%; 2010: 39%; 2009: 36%), and 11% beyond the tenth year (2010:(2011: 11%; 2009: 10%2010: 11%).

Market Risk

Reed Elsevier’s primary market risks are to interest rate fluctuations and exchange rate movements. Derivatives are used to hedge or reduce the risks of interest rate and exchange rate movements and are not entered into unless such risks exist. Derivatives used by Reed Elsevier for hedging a particular risk are not specialised and are generally available from numerous sources. The impact of market risks on net post employment benefit obligations and taxation is excluded from the following market risk sensitivity analysis.

Interest rate risk

Reed Elsevier’s interest rate exposure management policy is aimed at reducing the exposure of the combined businesses to changes in interest rates. The proportion of interest expense that is fixed on net debt is determined by reference to the level of net interest cover. Reed Elsevier uses fixed rate term debt, interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements and interest rate options to manage the exposure. Interest rate derivatives are used only to hedge an underlying risk and no net market positions are held.

At December 31, 2011, 69%2012, 59% of gross borrowings were either fixed rate or had been fixed through the use of interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements and options. A 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would result in an estimated decrease in net finance costs of £8 million (2011: £5 million (2010:million; 2010: £3 million; 2009: £4 million), based on the composition of financial instruments including cash, cash equivalents, bank loans and commercial paper borrowings at December 31, 2011.2012. A 100 basis point rise in interest rates would result in an estimated increase in net finance costs of £8 million (2011: £5 million (2010:million; 2010: £3 million; 2009: £4 million).

The impact on net equity of a theoretical change in interest rates as at December 31, 20112012 is restricted to the change in carrying value of floating rate to fixed rate interest rate derivatives in a designated cash flow hedge relationship and undesignated interest rate derivatives. A 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would result in an estimated reduction in net equity of £1 million (2011: £3 million (2010:million; 2010: £8 million; 2009: £14 million) and a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase net equity by an estimated £2 million (2011: £4 million (2010:million; 2010: £9 million; 2009: £15 million). The impact of a change in interest rates on the carrying value of fixed rate borrowings in a designated fair value hedge relationship would be offset by the change in carrying value of the related interest rate derivative. Fixed rate borrowings not in a designated hedging relationship are carried at amortised cost.

Foreign exchange rate risk

Translation exposures arise on the earnings and net assets of business operations in countries with currencies other than sterling, most particularly in respect of the US businesses. These exposures are hedged, to a significant extent, by a policy of denominating borrowings in currencies where significant translation exposures exist, most notably US dollars (see note 25).

A theoretical weakening of all currencies by 10% against sterling at December 31, 20112012 would decrease the carrying value of net assets, excluding net borrowings, by £472£495 million (2010: £457(2011: £525 million; 2009: £4662010: £508 million). This would be offset to a large degree by a decrease in net borrowings of £270£286 million (2010: £270(2011: £297 million; 2009: £3212010: £297 million). A strengthening of all currencies by 10% against sterling at December 31, 20112012 would increase the carrying value of net assets, excluding net borrowings, by £590£495 million (2010: £570(2011: £525 million; 2009: £5812010: £508 million) and increase net borrowings by £330£286 million (2010: £329(2011: £297 million; 2009: £3922010: £297 million).

A retranslation of the combined businesses’ net profit for the year assuming a 10% weakening of all foreign currencies against sterling but excluding transactional exposures would reduce net profit by £54£80 million (2010: £51(2011: £59 million; 2009: £172010: £56 million). A 10% strengthening of all foreign currencies against sterling on this basis would increase net profit for the year by £65£80 million (2010: £62(2011: £59 million; 2009: £202010: £56 million).

Credit risk

Reed Elsevier seeks to limit interest rate and foreign exchange risks described above by the use of financial instruments and as a result has a credit risk from the potential non performance by the counterparties to these financial instruments, which are unsecured. The amount of this credit risk is normally restricted to the amounts of any hedge gain and not the principal amount being hedged. Reed Elsevier also has a credit exposure to counterparties for the full principal amount of cash and cash equivalents. Credit risks are controlled by monitoring the credit quality of these counterparties, principally licensed commercial banks and investment banks with strong long term credit ratings, and the amounts outstanding with each of them.

19.Financial instruments – (continued)

 

Reed Elsevier has treasury policies in place which do not allow concentrations of risk with individual counterparties and do not allow significant treasury exposures with counterparties which are rated lower than A/A2A-/A3 by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s orand Fitch.

Reed Elsevier also has credit risk with respect to trade receivables due from its customers that include national and state governments, academic institutions and large and small enterprises including law firms, book stores and wholesalers. The concentration of credit risk from trade receivables is limited due to the large and broad customer base. Trade receivable exposures are managed locally in the business units where they arise. Where appropriate, business units seek to minimise this exposure by taking payment in advance and through management of credit terms. Allowance is made for bad and doubtful debts based on management’s assessment of the risk taking into account the ageing profile, experience and circumstance. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset, including derivative financial instruments, recorded in the statement of financial position.

Included within trade receivables are the following amounts which are past due but for which no allowance has been made. Past due up to one month £148 million (2011: £212 million (2010:million; 2010: £241 million; 2009: £248 million); past due two to three months £58 million (2011: £54 million (2010:million; 2010: £58 million; 2009: £66 million); past due four to six months £14 million (2011: £20 million (2010:million; 2010: £16 million; 2009: £25 million); and past due greater than six months £5£1 million (2010:(2011: £5 million; 2009: nil)2010: £5 million.). Examples of trade receivables which are past due but for which no allowance has been made include those receivables where there is no concern over the creditworthiness of the customer and where the history of dealings with the customer indicate the amount will be settled.

Hedge accounting

The hedging relationships that are designated under IAS39 — Financial Instruments are described below:

Fair value hedges

Reed Elsevier has entered into interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate swaps to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed rate borrowings due to interest rate and foreign currency movements which could affect the income statement.

Interest rate derivatives (including cross currency interest rate swaps) with a principal amount of £1,502 million (2011: £1,081 millionmillion; 2010: £1,093 million). were in place at December 31, 20112012 swapping fixed rate term debt issues denominated in sterling, euros and Swiss francs (CHF) to floating rate sterling, euro and US dollar (USD) debt, respectively, for the whole of their term (2010: £1,093 million; 2009: £1,104 million).term. Included within this amount are interest rate derivatives with a principal amount of £488 million (2011: nil; 2010: nil) which were de-designated as fair value hedges during the year.

The gains and losses on the borrowings and related derivatives designated as fair value hedges, which are included in the income statement, for the three years ended December 31, 20112012 were as follows:

Gains/(losses) on borrowings and related derivatives

 

  January 1,
2009
£m
 Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
 Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
 December 31,
2009
£m
   January  1,
2010

£m
 Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
 Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
 December  31,
2010

£m
 

GBP debt

       9        9     9    (16      (7

Related interest rate swaps

       (9      (9   (9  16        7  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EUR debt

       (2      (2   (2  (10      (12

Related interest rate swaps

       2        2     2    10        12  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CHF debt

   (41  (11  4    (48   (48  (37  (1  (86

Related CHF to USD cross currency interest rate swaps

   41    11    (4  48     48    37    1    86  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total GBP, EUR and CHF debt

   (41  (4  4    (41   (41  (63  (1  (105

Total related interest rate derivatives

   41    4    (4  41     41    63    1    105  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net gain

                                  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

19.Financial instruments – (continued)

 

   January 1,
2011
£m
  Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
  Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
  December 31,
2011
£m
 

GBP debt

   (7  (23      (30

Related interest rate swaps

   7    23        30  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EUR debt

   (12  3        (9

Related interest rate swaps

   12    (3      9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CHF debt

   (86  3    (1  (84

Related CHF to USD cross currency interest rate swaps

   86    (3  1    84  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total GBP, EUR and CHF debt

   (105  (17  (1  (123

Total related interest rate derivatives

   105    17    1    123  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net gain

                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

   January 1,
2010
£m
  Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
  Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
  December 31,
2010
£m
 

GBP debt

   9    (16      (7

Related interest rate swaps

   (9  16        7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EUR debt

   (2  (10      (12

Related interest rate swaps

   2    10        12  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CHF debt

   (48  (37  (1  (86

Related CHF to USD cross currency interest rate swaps

   48    37    1    86  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total GBP, EUR and CHF debt

   (41  (63  (1  (105

Total related interest rate derivatives

   41    63    1    105  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net gain

                 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  January 1,
2011
£m
 Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
 Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
 December 31,
2011
£m
   January 1,
2012
£m
 Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
 De-designated
£m
 Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
 December 31,
2012
£m
 

GBP debt

   (7  (23      (30   (30  (6          (36

Related interest rate swaps

   7    23        30     30    6            36  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                      
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EUR debt

   (12  3        (9   (9  (8  9        (8

Related interest rate swaps

   12    (3      9     9    8    (9      8  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                      
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CHF debt

   (86  3    (1  (84   (84          4    (80

Related CHF to USD cross currency interest rate swaps

   86    (3  1    84     84            (4  80  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
                                      
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total GBP, EUR and CHF debt

   (105  (17  (1  (123   (123  (14  9    4    (124

Total related interest rate derivatives

   105    17    1    123     123    14    (9  (4  124  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net gain

                                      
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

All fair value hedges were highly effective throughout the three years ended December 31, 2011.2012.

Gross borrowings as at December 31, 20112012 included £37 million (2011: £43 million (2010:million; 2010: £51 million; 2009: £59 million) in relation to fair value adjustments to borrowings previously designated in a fair value hedge relationship which were de-designated in 2008. The related derivatives were closed out on de-designation with a cash inflow of £62 million. £5 million (2011: £8 million (2010:million; 2010: £10 million; 2009: £11 million) of these fair value adjustments were amortised in the year as a reduction to finance costs.

Gross borrowings also included £2 million (2011: nil; 2010: nil) in relation to fair value adjustments to borrowings previously designated in a fair value hedging relationship which were de-designated during the year. £7 million (2011: nil; 2010: nil) of these fair value adjustments were amortised in the year as a reduction of finance costs. The related derivatives remained on the balance sheet at December 31, 2012 with a carrying value of £3 million.

Cash flow hedges

Reed Elsevier enters into two types of cash flow hedge:

 

 (1)Interest rate derivatives which fix the interest expense on a portion of forecast floating rate debt (including commercial paper, short term bank loans and floating rate term debt).

 

 (2)Foreign exchange derivatives which fix the exchange rate on a portion of future foreign currency subscription revenues forecast by the Elsevier science and medicalScientific, Technical & Medical businesses for up to 50 months.

19.Financial instruments – (continued)

 

Movements in the hedge reserve (pre-tax) in 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, including gains and losses on cash flow hedging instruments, were as follows:

 

  Interest rate
hedges
£m
 Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
 Total
hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
 

Hedge reserve at January 1, 2009: losses deferred

   (80  (176  (256

(Losses)/gains arising in 2009

   (11  64    53  

Amounts recognised in income statement

   46    58    104  

Exchange translation differences

   7    3    10  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   Interest rate
hedges
£m
 Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
 Total
hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
 

Hedge reserve at January 1, 2010: losses deferred

   (38  (51  (89   (38  (51  (89

Losses arising in 2010

   (15  (43  (58   (15  (43  (58

Amounts recognised in income statement

   26    35    61     26    35    61  

Exchange translation differences

   2        (2   (2      (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Hedge reserve at January 1, 2011: losses deferred

   (29  (59  (88   (29  (59  (88

Losses arising in 2011

   (3  (21  (24   (3  (21  (24

Amounts recognised in income statement

   15    33    48     15    33    48  

Exchange translation differences

       1    1         1    1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Hedge reserve at December 31, 2011: losses deferred

   (17  (46  (63

Hedge reserve at January 1, 2012: losses deferred

   (17  (46  (63

(Losses)/gains arising in 2012

   (2  72    70  

Amounts recognised in income statement

   16    10    26  

Exchange translation differences

   1    1    2  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Hedge reserve at December 31, 2012: (losses)/gains deferred

   (2  37    35  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

All cash flow hedges were highly effective throughout the three years ended December 31, 2011.2012.

A tax creditcharge of £9 million (2011: £15 million (2010:credit; 2010: £21 million; 2009: £24 million)million credit) in respect of the above gains and losses at December 31, 20112012 was also deferred in the hedge reserve.

Of the amounts recognised in the income statement in the year, losses of £10 million (2011: £33 million (2010:million; 2010: £35 million; 2009: £58 million) were recognised in revenue, and losses of £16 million (2011: £15 million (2010:million; 2010: £26 million; 2009: £46 million) were recognised in finance costs. A tax credit of £5 million (2011: £11 million (2010:million; 2010: £15 million; 2009: £20 million) was recognised in relation to these items.

The deferred gains and losses on cash flow hedges at December 31, 20112012 are currently expected to be recognised in the income statement in future years as follows:

 

  Interest rate
hedges
£m
 Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
 Total
hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
   Interest rate
hedges
£m
 Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
   Total
hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
 

2012

   (13  (14  (27

2013

   (4  (19  (23   (2  7     5  

2014

       (10  (10       16     16  

2015

       (3  (3       11     11  

2016

                    3     3  

2017

              
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Losses deferred in hedge reserve at end of year

   (17  (46  (63

(Losses)/gains deferred in hedge reserve at end of year

   (2  37     35  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The cash flows for these hedges are expected to occur in line with the recognition of the gain and losses in the income statement, other than in respect of certain forward foreign exchange hedges on subscriptions, where cash flows may be expected to occur in advance of the subscription year.

 

20.Deferred tax

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Deferred tax assets

   212    151    208     79    212    151  

Deferred tax liabilities

   (1,236  (1,192  (1,272   (919  (1,236  (1,192
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   (1,024  (1,041  (1,064   (840  (1,024  (1,041
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

20.Deferred tax – (continued)

 

Movements in deferred tax liabilities and assets (before taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same jurisdiction) are summarised as follows:

 

 Deferred tax liabilities Deferred tax assets    Deferred tax liabilities Deferred tax assets   
 Excess of
tax  allowances
over
amortisation
£m
 Acquired
intangible
assets
£m
 Pensions
assets
£m
 Other
temporary
differences
£m
 Excess of
amortisation
over tax
allowances
£m
 Tax losses
carried
forward
£m
 Pensions
liabilities
£m
 Other
temporary
differences
£m
 Total
£m
 

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at January 1, 2009

  (219  (1,239  (44  (23  10    6    190    147    (1,172

(Charge)/credit to profit

  (20  118    (4  4    19    3    (24  (56  40  

Credit/(charge) to equity

          17                (27  (15  (25

Acquisitions

                              (20  (20

Disposals

      (1                          (1

Exchange translation differences

  23    115        1    (2      (17  (6  114  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  Excess of
tax allowances
over
amortisation
£m
 Acquired
intangible
assets

£m
 Pensions
assets
£m
 Other
temporary
differences
£m
 Excess of
amortisation
over tax
allowances
£m
 Tax losses
carried
forward
£m
 Pensions
liabilities
£m
 Other
temporary
differences
£m
 Total
£m
 

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at January 1, 2010

  (216  (1,007  (31  (18  27    9    122    50    (1,064  (216  (1,007  (31  (18  27    9    122    50    (1,064

Credit/(charge) to profit

  2    100    (7  1    (14  4    (40      46    2    100    (7  1    (14  4    (40      46  

Credit/(charge) to equity

          23    7            (7  6    29            23    7            (7  6    29  

Transfers

                              (11  (11                              (11  (11

Acquisitions

      (9                          (9      (9                      (9  (9

Exchange translation differences

  (9  (28                  3    2    (32  (9  (28                  3    2    (32
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at January 1, 2011

  (223  (944  (15  (10  13    13    78    47    (1,041  (223  (944  (15  (10  13    13    78    47    (1,041

(Charge)/credit to profit

  (6  131    (10  (94  3    32    (3  24    77    (6  131    (10  (94  3    32    (3  24    77  

Credit to equity

          25                11    6    42  

Credit/(charge) to equity

          25                11    6    42  

Transfers

                              (17  (17                              (17  (17

Acquisitions

      (85              2        5    (78      (85              2        5    (78

Disposals/Reclassified as held for sale

              1                (1)      

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

              1                (1    

Exchange translation differences

  (2  (2      (2      1        (2  (7  (2  (2      (2      1        (2  (7

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at December 31, 2011

  (231  (900      (105  16    48    86    62    (1,024
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at January 1, 2012

  (231  (900      (105  16    48    86    62    (1,024

(Charge)/credit to profit

  (5  85        (9  (3  (19  (32  23    40  

(Charge)/credit to equity

              (3          102    (6  93  

Acquisitions

  1    (10          (3  (2      (2  (16

Disposals/reclassified as held for sale

  2    18        7        (1      (1  25  

Exchange translation differences

  10    35        2    (1  (3  (3  2    42  

Deferred tax (liability)/asset at December 31, 2012

  (223  (772      (108  9    23    153    78    (840
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other deferred tax liabilities includes temporary differences in respect of plant, property and equipment, and capitalized development spend. Other deferred tax assets includes temporary differences in respect of share-based remuneration, provisions and financial instruments.

20.Deferred tax – (continued)

Deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses and other deductible temporary differences have only been recognized to the extent that it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow the asset to be recovered. Accordingly, no deferred tax asset has been recognized in respect of unused trading losses of approximately £129 million (2011: £133 million, 2010: £147 million) carried forward at the year end. The deferred tax asset not recognized in respect of these losses is approximately £34 million (2011: £36 million, 2010: £41 million). Of these unrecognized losses, £47 million (2011: £45 million; 2010: £45 million) will expire if not utilized within 10 years, and £82 million (2011: £88 million; 2010: £102 million) will expire after more than 10 years.

Deferred tax assets of approximately £9 million (2011: £31 million; 2010: £17 million) have not been recognized in respect of tax losses and other temporary differences carried forward of £41 million (2011: £94 million; 2010: £63 million) which can only be used to offset future capital gains.

21.Inventories and pre-publication costs

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Raw materials

   6     6     9     3     6     6  

Pre-publication costs

   115     130     168     101     115     130  

Finished goods

   69     92     98     55     69     92  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   190     228     275     159     190     228  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

22.Trade and other receivables

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Trade receivables

   1,361    1,361    1,367     1,256    1,361    1,361  

Allowance for doubtful debts

   (63  (73  (80   (51  (63  (73
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
   1,298    1,288    1,287     1,205    1,298    1,288  

Prepayments and accrued income

   185    187    205     175    185    187  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   1,483    1,475    1,492     1,380    1,483    1,475  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Trade receivables are predominantly non-interest bearing and their carrying amounts approximate to their fair value.

Trade receivables are stated net of allowances for bad and doubtful debts. The movements in the provision during the year were as follows:

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   73    80    77     63    73    80  

Charge for the year

   15    15    33     13    15    15  

Trade receivables written off

   (23  (22  (24   (18  (23  (22

Disposals

   (1           (6  (1    

Exchange translation differences

   (1      (6   (1  (1    
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   63    73    80     51    63    73  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

23.Assets and liabilities held for sale

The major classes of assets and liabilities of operations classified as held for sale are as follows:

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Goodwill

   19               134     19       

Intangible assets

   7               84     7       

Property, plant and equipment

   3            

Deferred tax assets

   4     1       

Inventories

   1               1     1       

Deferred tax assets

   1            

Trade and other receivables

   16          5     71     16       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets held for sale

   44          5     297     44       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Trade and other payables

   17          5     69     17       

Deferred tax liabilities

   27            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale

   17          5     96     17       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

24.Trade and other payables

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Payables and accruals

   1,245     1,276     1,251     1,150     1,245     1,276  

Deferred income

   1,412     1,308     1,220     1,394     1,412     1,308  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   2,657     2,584     2,471     2,544     2,657     2,584  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

25.Borrowings

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 
  Falling
due

within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more

than
1 year

£m
   Total
£m
   Falling
due

within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more

than
1 year

£m
   Total
£m
   Falling
due

within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more

than
1 year

£m
   Total
£m
   Falling
due
within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more
than
1 year
£m
   Total
£m
   Falling
due
within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more
than
1 year
£m
   Total
£m
   Falling
due
within
1 year
£m
   Falling
due

in
more
than
1 year
£m
   Total
£m
 

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost:

                                    

Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper

   596          596     379          379     515          515     131          131     596          596     379          379  

Finance leases

   2     6     8     7     15     22     7     20     27     7     9     16     2     6     8     7     15     22  

Other loans

   384     1,466     1,850     130     1,944     2,074     156     2,247     2,403          1,526     1,526     384     1,466     1,850     130     1,944     2,074  

Other loans in fair value hedging relationships

        1,204     1,204          1,198     1,198          1,144     1,144     102     1,036     1,138          1,204     1,204          1,198     1,198  

Other loans previously in fair value hedging relationships

        624     624          629     629          617     617     490     591     1,081          624     624          629     629  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   982     3,300     4,282     516     3,786     4,302     678     4,028     4,706     730     3,162     3,892     982     3,300     4,282     516     3,786     4,302  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

In 2012, £184 million principal amount of term debt maturing in 2014 and 2019 was exchanged for £191 million principal amount of term debt maturing in 2022 and cash payments of £46 million. The exchange is treated as a debt modification for accounting purposes. The premium arising of £53 million is offset against the carrying amount of the newly issued term debt maturing in 2022 and will be amortised over its life.

The total fair value of financial liabilities measured at amortised cost is £1,996 million (2011: £2,745 million (2010:million; 2010 £2,796 million; 2009 £3,262 million). The total fair value of other loans in fair value hedging relationships is £1,177 million (2011: £1,237 million (2010:million; 2010: £1,279 million; 2009: £1,257 million). The total fair value of other loans previously in fair value hedging relationships is £1,189 million (2011: £707 million (2010:million; 2010: £685 million; 2009: £646 million).

25.Borrowings – (continued)

 

Other loans include term debt issued by Reed Elsevier Capital Inc., a 100% owned finance subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The parent companies have fully and unconditionally guaranteed these securities. No other subsidiary of the parent companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV guarantees the securities.

Analysis by year of repayment

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
  Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 

Within 1 year

  596    384    2    982    379    130    7    516    515    156    7    678    131    592    7    730    596    384    2    982    379    130    7    516  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Within 1 to 2 years

      618    3    621        382    7    389        342    7    349        644    6    650        618    3    621        382    7    389  

Within 2 to 3 years

      725    2    727        636    8    644        431    6    437        178    3    181        725    2    727        636    8    644  

Within 3 to 4 years

      188    1    189        825        825        633    7    640        400        400        188    1    189        825        825  

Within 4 to 5 years

      401        401        188        188        779        779        359        359        401        401        188        188  

After 5 years

      1,362        1,362        1,740        1,740        1,823        1,823        1,572        1,572        1,362        1,362        1,740        1,740  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
      3,294    6    3,300        3,771    15    3,786        4,008    20    4,028        3,153    9    3,162        3,294    6    3,300        3,771    15    3,786  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  596    3,678    8    4,282    379    3,901    22    4,302    515    4,164    27    4,706    131    3,745    16    3,892    596    3,678    8    4,282    379    3,901    22    4,302  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper were backed up at December 31, 20112012 by a $2,000 million (£1,2901,231 million) committed bank facility maturing in June 2014,2015, which was undrawn.

Analysis by currency

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
  Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper

£m
 Other
loans
£m
 Finance
leases
£m
 Total
£m
 

US Dollars

  485    2,431    8    2,924    225    2,566    22    2,813    371    2,828    27    3,226    25    2,059    16    2,100    485    2,431    8    2,924    225    2,566    22    2,813  

£ Sterling

      730        730        707        707        691        691        736        736        730        730        707        707  

Euro

  91    517        608    123    628        751    117    645        762    103    950        1,053    91    517        608    123    628        751  

Other currencies

  20            20    31            31    27            27    3            3    20            20    31            31  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  596    3,678    8    4,282    379    3,901    22    4,302    515    4,164    27    4,706    131    3,745    16    3,892    596    3,678    8    4,282    379    3,901    22    4,302  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Included in the US dollar amounts for other loans above is £347 million (2011: £363 million (2010:million; 2010: £364 million; 2009: £316 million) of debt denominated in Swiss francs (CHF 500 million; 2010:2011: CHF 500 million; 2009:2010: CHF 500 million) that was swapped into US dollars on issuance and against which there are related derivative financial instruments, which, as at December 31, 2011,2012, had a fair value of £80 million (2011: £84 million (2010:million; 2010: £86 million; 2009: £48 million).

26.Lease arrangements

Finance leases

At December 31, 20112012 future finance lease obligations fall due as follows:

 

 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Within one year

  2    8    7    7    2    8  

In the second to fifth years inclusive

  6    17    23    9    6    17  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  8    25    30    16    8    25  

Less future finance charges

      (3  (3          (3
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  8    22    27    16    8    22  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Present value of future finance lease obligations payable:

      

Within one year

  2    7    7    7    2    7  

In the second to fifth years inclusive

  6    15    20    9    6    15  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  8    22    27    16    8    22  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The fair value of the lease obligations approximates to their carrying amount.

Operating leases

Reed Elsevier leases various properties, principally offices and warehouses, which have varying terms and renewal rights that are typical to the territory in which they are located.

At December 31, 20112012 outstanding commitments under non-cancellable operating leases fall due as follows:

 

 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Within one year

  129    128    140    117    129    128  

In the second to fifth years inclusive

  305    306    354    309    305    306  

After five years

  206    208    229    184    206    208  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  640    642    723    610    640    642  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Of the above outstanding commitments, £577 million (2011: £605 million (2010:million; 2010: £609 million; 2009: £677 million) relate to land and buildings.

Reed Elsevier has a number of properties that are sub-leased.sub leased. The future lease receivables contracted with sub-tenants fall due as follows:

 

 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Within one year

  21    17    17    16    21    17  

In the second to fifth years inclusive

  38    25    36    33    38    25  

After five years

  19    5    7    17    19    5  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  78    47    60    66    78    47  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

27.Provisions

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
 Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
 Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
  Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
 Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
 Property
£m
 Restructuring
£m
 Total
£m
 

At January 1

  105    54    159    89    106    195    45    69    114    109    17    126    105    54    159    89    106    195  

Transfer

  22        22                          

Charged

  16        16    36    31    67    70    157    227    62        62    16        16    36    31    67  

Utilised

  (12  (37  (49  (22  (82  (104  (20  (114  (134  (24  (12  (36  (12  (37  (49  (22  (82  (104

Exchange translation differences

              2    (1  1    (6  (6  (12  (5      (5              2    (1  1  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

  109    17    126    105    54    159    89    106    195    164    5    169    109    17    126    105    54    159  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

27.Provisions – (continued)

 

Property provisions relate to estimated sub-leasesub lease shortfalls and guarantees given in respect of certain property leases for various periods up to 2024. The charge in 2012 of £62 million (2011: £16 million; 2010: 36 million) predominantly relates to property exposures on disposed businesses.

Provisions as at December 31, 20112012 are included within current and non-current liabilities as follows:

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Current liabilities

   39     71     134    30    39    71  

Non-current liabilities

   87     88     61    139    87    88  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   126     159     195    169    126    159  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

28.Contingent liabilities and capital commitments

There are contingent liabilities amounting to £11 million (2011: £15 million (2010:million; 2010: £18 million; 2009: £22 million) in respect of property lease guarantees.

 

29.Combined share capitals

 

   2011
£m
  2010
£m
  2009
£m
 

At January 1

   224    225    209  

Issue of ordinary shares

           20  

Exchange translation differences

   (1  (1  (4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31

   223    224    225  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

In July 2009, Reed Elsevier PLC placed 109,198,190 new ordinary shares at 405p per share for proceeds, net of issue costs, of £435 million and Reed Elsevier NV placed 63,030,989 new ordinary shares at €7.08 per share for net proceeds of €441 million. The number of shares issued represented 9.9% of the issued ordinary share capital of the respective parent companies prior to the placings. No share premium was recognised in Reed Elsevier PLC as the company took advantage of section 612 of the Companies Act 2006 regarding merger relief.

  2012
£m
  2011
£m
  2010
£m
 

At January 1

  223    224    225  

Issue of ordinary shares

  1          

Exchange translation differences

  (1  (1  (1
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31

  223    223    224  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Combined share capitals exclude the shares of Reed Elsevier NV held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC.

Disclosures in respect of share capital are given in note 13 to the Reed Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements and note 14 to the Reed Elsevier NV consolidated financial statements.

 

30.Combined share premiums

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
  2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   2,754    2,807    2,529    2,723    2,754    2,807  

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   9    11    395    47    9    11  

Exchange translation differences

   (40  (64  (117  (43  (40  (64
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   2,723    2,754    2,807    2,727    2,723    2,754  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Combined share premiums exclude the share premium in respect of shares of Reed Elsevier NV held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC.

31.Combined shares held in treasury

 

  Shares held
by EBT
£m
 Shares held
by parent
companies
£m
 Total
£m
 

At January 1, 2009

   232    551    783  

Settlement of share awards

   (57      (57

Exchange translation differences

       (28  (28
  

 

  

 

  

 

   Shares held
by EBT
£m
 Shares held
by parent
companies
£m
 Total
£m
 

At January 1, 2010

   175    523    698     175    523    698  

Settlement of share awards

   (9      (9   (9      (9

Exchange translation differences

       (12  (12       (12  (12
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At January 1, 2011

   166    511    677     166    511    677  

Settlement of share awards

   (7      (7   (7      (7

Exchange translation differences

       (7  (7       (7  (7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2011

   159    504    663  

At January 1, 2012

   159    504    663  

Repurchase of ordinary shares

       250    250  

Settlement of share awards

   (7      (7

Exchange translation differences

       (7  (7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2012

   152    747    899  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 20112012 shares held in treasury related to 14,051,025 (2010: 14,654,161; 2009: 15,350,605)13,451,468 (2011: 14,051,025; 2010: 14,654,161) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 7,380,906 (2010: 7,781,790; 2009: 8,219,196)6,990,101 (2011: 7,380,906; 2010: 7,781,790) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”); and 34,196,298 (2010:57,484,915 (2011: 34,196,298; 2009:2010: 34,196,298) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 23,952,791 (2010:36,613,087 (2011: 23,952,791; 2009:2010: 23,952,791) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares held by the respective parent companies.

During 2012 Reed Elsevier repurchased 23,288,616 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 12,660,296 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares for consideration of £250 million. On December 28, 2012 Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV announced an irrevocable, non discretionary programme to repurchase further ordinary shares up to the value of £100 million which was completed in February 2013.

The EBT purchases Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shares which, at the trustees’ discretion, can be used in respect of the exercise of share options and to meet commitments under conditional share awards.

 

32.Translation reserve

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

At January 1

   29     (100  (14   88    29     (100

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

   31     94    (122   (136  32     94  

Exchange translation differences on capital and reserves

   27     35    36     25    27     35  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

At December 31

   87     29    (100   (23  88     29  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

33.Other combined reserves

 

  2011 2010 2009 
  Hedge
reserve
£m
  Other
reserves
£m
  Total
£m
  Total
£m
  Total
£m
 
   2012 2011 2010 
   Hedge
reserve
£m
 Other
reserves
£m
 Total
£m
 Total
£m
 Total
£m
 

At January 1

   (67  (320  (387  (502  (988   (48  (151  (199  (387  (502

Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders

       760    760    642    391         1,069    1,069    760    642  

Dividends paid

       (497  (497  (483  (457       (521  (521  (497  (483

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

                   419  

Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension schemes

       (113  (113  (63  6  

Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes

       (329  (329  (113  (63

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

       (1  (1                       (1    

Fair value movements on disposals of available for sale investments

                   1  

Transfer to net profit on disposals of available for sale investments

       11    11          

Fair value movements on cash flow hedges

   (24      (24  (58  53     70        70    (24  (58

Tax recognised directly in equity

   5    37    42    29    (25   (19  107    88    42    29  

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

       27    27    (7  17         31    31    27    (7

Settlement of share awards

       (7  (7  (9  (60       (7  (7  (7  (9

Transfer from hedge reserve to net profit (net of tax)

   37        37    46    84  

Acquisition of non-controlling interest

       (43  (43        

Transfer from cash flow hedge reserve to net profit (net of tax)

   21        21    37    46  

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interest

       6    6    (43    

Exchange translation differences

   1    6    7    18    57     2    10    12    7    18  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   (48  (151  (199  (387  (502   26    226    252    (199  (387
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other reserves principally comprise retained earnings, the share based remuneration reserve and available for sale investment reserve.

 

34.Related party transactions

Transactions between the Reed Elsevier combined businesses have been eliminated within the combined financial statements. Transactions with joint ventures were made on normal market terms of trading and comprise sales of goods and services of £1 million (2010:(2011: £1 million; 2009: £22010: £1 million).

As at December 31, 20112012 amounts owed by joint ventures were £1 million (2011: £3 million; 2010: £2 million) and amounts due from joint ventures were £1 million (2010: £2 million; 2009: £4 million)(2011: nil; 2010: nil). Key management personnel are also related parties and comprise the executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Transactions with key management personnel are set out below.below:

 

  2011
£m
   2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Salaries and other short term employee benefits

   3     5    6     4     3     5  

Post employment benefits

        1    1               1  

Share based remuneration

   4     (1  1     5     4     (1

Termination benefits

            1  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   7     5    9     9     7     5  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

35.Approval of financial statements

The combined financial statements were approved by the Boards of directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV on 15 February 2012.27, 2013.

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

 

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and members of Reed Elsevier PLC:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries (“the Company”(the “Company”) as ofat December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the related consolidated income statements, and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the results of itstheir operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE LLP

London, United Kingdom

February 15, 201227, 2013

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Administrative expenses

   3     (2  (2  (2   3     (2  (2  (2

Effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings

   4     (13  (13  (12   4     (14  (13  (13

Share of results of joint ventures

   12     404    342    213     12     561    404    342  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating profit

     389    327    199       545    389    327  

Finance income

   7     1    1    2     7     1    1    1  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

     390    328    201       546    390    328  

Taxation

   8     (1  (1  (6   8     6    (1  (1
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

     389    327    195       552    389    327  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

     2011
£m
 2010
£m
   2009
£m
      2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

     389    327     195       552    389    327  

Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year

     (14  25     (2     (146  (14  25  
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

     375    352     193       406    375    352  
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

   Note   20112012
pence
   20102011
pence
   20092010
pence
 

Earnings per ordinary share (EPS)(“EPS”)

        

Basic earnings per share

   10     46.0p32.4p     27.3p17.2p  

Diluted earnings per share

   10     45.4p32.1p     27.1p17.1p  

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Cash flows from operating activities

            

Cash used by operations

   11     (2  (2  (2   11     (2  (2  (2

Interest received

     1    1    2       1    1    1  

Tax paid

     (1  (3  (6     (2  (1  (3
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

     (2  (4  (6     (3  (2  (4
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

            

Dividends received from joint ventures

   12     600    589         12     694    600    589  

Increase in investment in joint ventures

   12         (596  (462   12             (596
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash received from/(used in) investing activities

     600    (7  (462     694    600    (7
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

            

Equity dividends paid

   9     (248  (245  (228   9     (264  (248  (245

Repurchase of ordinary shares

     (143        

Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares

     8    9    440       33    8    9  

(Income)/decrease in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   11     (358  247    256  

(Increase)/decrease in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   11     (317  (358  247  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash (used in)/from financing activities

     (598  11    468       (691  (598  11  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Movement in cash and cash equivalents

                              
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS AT DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   Note   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Non-current assets

            

Investments in joint ventures

   12     1,158    1,037    927     12     1,207    1,158    1,037  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

     1,158    1,037    927       1,207    1,158    1,037  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Current liabilities

            

Taxation

     9    9    11       1    9    9  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

     9    9    11       1    9    9  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets

     1,149    1,028    916       1,206    1,149    1,028  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Capital and reserves

            

Called up share capital

   13     180    180    180     13     181    180    180  

Share premium account

   14     1,176    1,168    1,159     14     1,208    1,176    1,168  

Shares held in treasury (including in joint ventures)

   15     (308  (312  (317   15     (447  (308  (312

Capital redemption reserve

   16     4    4    4     16     4    4    4  

Translation reserve

   17     159    142    92     17     87    159    142  

Other reserves

   18     (62  (154  (202   18     173    (62  (154
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

     1,149    1,028    916       1,206    1,149    1,028  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

 Note Share
capital
£m
 Share
premium
£m
 Shares
held in
treasury
£m
 Capital
redemption
reserve

£m
 Translation
reserve

£m
 Other
reserves
£m
 Total
equity
£m
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

   180    1,176    (308  4    159    (62  1,149  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   (72  478    406  

Equity dividends paid

  9                        (264  (264

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   1    32                    33  

Repurchase of ordinary shares

           (143              (143

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       16    16  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

           4            (4    

Share of joint venture’s disposal of non-controlling interests

                       3    3  

Equalisation adjustments

                       6    6  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   181    1,208    (447  4    87    173    1,206  
 Note Share
capital
£m
 Share
premium
£m
 Shares
held in
treasury
£m
 Capital
redemption
reserve
£m
 Translation
reserve
£m
 Other
reserves
£m
 Total
equity
£m
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2011

   180    1,168    (312  4    142    (154  1,028     180    1,168    (312  4    142    (154  1,028  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   17    358    375                     17    358    375  

Equity dividends paid

  9                        (248  (248  9                        (248  (248

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

       8                    8         8                    8  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

           4            (4    

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       14    14                         14    14  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

           4            (4    

Share of joint venture’s acquisitions of non-controlling interests

                       (23  (23                       (23  (23

Equalisation adjustments

                       (5  (5                       (5  (5
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

   180    1,176    (308  4    159    (62  1,149     180    1,176    (308  4    159    (62  1,149  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2010

   180    1,159    (317  4    92    (202  916     180    1,159    (317  4    92    (202  916  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   50    302    352                     50    302    352  

Equity dividends paid

  9                        (245  (245  9                        (245  (245

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

       9                    9         9                    9  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

           5            (5    

Share of joint ventures’ decrease in share based remuneration reserve

                       (4  (4

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       (4  (4

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

           5            (5    
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   180    1,168    (312  4    142    154    1,028     180    1,168    (312  4    142    (154  1,028  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2009

   164    1,154    (347  4    157    (628  504  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   (65  258    193  

Equity dividends paid

  9                        (228  (228

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   16    5                419    440  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

           30            (32  (2

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       9    9  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   180    1,159    (317  4    92    (202  916  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.Basis of financial statements

On January 1, 1993 Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV contributed their businesses to two companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. Reed Elsevier Group plc, which owns all the publishing and information businesses, is incorporated in England and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, which owns the financing and treasury companies, is incorporated in the Netherlands. Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV each hold a 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc. Reed Elsevier PLC holds a 39% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV with Reed Elsevier NV holding a 61% interest. Reed Elsevier PLC additionally holds an indirect equity interest in Reed Elsevier NV, reflecting the arrangements entered into between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV at the time of the merger, which determined the equalisation ratio whereby one Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share is, in broad terms, intended to confer equivalent economic interests to 1.538 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

Under the equalisation arrangements Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders have a 52.9% economic interest in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders (other than Reed Elsevier PLC) have a 47.1% interest. Holders of ordinary shares in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV enjoy substantially equivalent dividend and capital rights with respect to their ordinary shares.

 

2.Accounting policies

Basis of preparation

These consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared under the historic cost convention, report the consolidated statements of income, statement, cash flow and financial position of Reed Elsevier PLC, and have been prepared under the historic cost convention and in accordance with accounting policies that are in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and IFRS as adopted by the European Union (“EU”).Union.

Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts shown in the financial statements are in pounds sterling (“£”).

The basis of the merger of the businesses of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV is set out on page 11.

Determination of profit

The Reed Elsevier PLC share of the Reed Elsevier combined results has been calculated on the basis of the 52.9% economic interest of the Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, after taking account of results arising in Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries. Dividends paid to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level inclusive of the UK tax credit received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. In Reed Elsevier PLC’s consolidated financial statements, an adjustment is required to equalise the benefit of the tax credit between the two sets of shareholders in accordance with the equalisation agreement. This equalisation adjustment arises on dividends paid by Reed Elsevier PLC to its shareholders and reduces the consolidated attributable earnings by 47.1% of the total amount of the tax credit.

The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the combined financial statements are set out on pages F-10 to F-17.

Investments

Reed Elsevier PLC’s 52.9% economic interest in the net assets of the combined businesses has been shown on the statement of financial position as investments in joint ventures, net of the assets and liabilities reported as part of Reed Elsevier PLC and its subsidiaries. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.

Foreign exchange translation

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each statement of financial position date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial position date. Exchange differences arising are recorded in the income statement. The exchange gains or losses relating to the retranslation of Reed Elsevier PLC’s 52.9% economic interest in the net assets of the combined businesses are classified as equity and transferred to the translation reserve.

When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative translation differences are recognised within the income statement in the period.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

Taxation

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior year taxable profits and the movements on deferred tax that are recognised in the income statement. Tax arising in joint ventures is included in the share of results of joint ventures.

The tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using the applicable tax rate that has been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the date of the statement of financial position.

Deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts, it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is not recognised on temporary differences arising in respect of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes.

Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would become payable on the distribution of retained profits from foreign subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.

Movements in deferred tax are charged or credited in the income statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised in equity. Deferred tax credits in respect of share based remuneration are recognised in equity to the extent that expected tax deductions exceed the related expense.

Critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

Critical judgments in the preparation of the combined financial statements are set out on pages F-14 to F-16.

Standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective

Recently issued standards, amendments and interpretations and their impact on future accounting policies and reporting have been considered on pages F-16 and F-17F16 to F17 of the combined financial statements.

 

3.Administrative expenses

Administrative expenses include £799,000 (2010: £742,000; 2009: £712,000)£877,000 (2011: £799,000; 2010: £742,000) paid in the year to Reed Elsevier Group plc under a contract for the services of directors and administrative support. Reed Elsevier PLC has no employees (2010:(2011: nil; 2009:2010: nil).

 

4.Effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings

The tax credit equalisation adjustment arises on ordinary dividends paid by Reed Elsevier PLC to its shareholders and reduces the consolidated profit attributable to ordinary shareholders by 47.1% of the total amount of the tax credit, as set out in the accounting policies in note 2.

 

5.Auditor’s remuneration

Audit fees payable by Reed Elsevier PLC were £28,000 (2010: £27,000; 2009: £26,000)(2011: £28,000; 2010: £27,000). Further information on the audit and non audit fees paid by the Reed Elsevier combined businesses to Deloitte LLP and its associates is set out in note 5 to the combined financial statements.

 

6.Related party transactions

All transactions with joint ventures, which are related parties of Reed Elsevier PLC, are reflected in these financial statements. Key management personnel are also related parties and comprise the executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC. Transactions with key management personnel are set out in note 34 to the combined financial statements.

 

7.Finance income

 

   2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
 

Finance income from joint ventures

   1     1     2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Finance income from joint ventures

   1     1     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

8.Taxation

 

                   2011     
£m
     2010    
£m
  2009 
£m
                    2012     
£m
     2011    
£m
  2010 
£m
 

UK corporation tax

  

   1    1    6  

UK corporation tax (credit)/expense

UK corporation tax (credit)/expense

  

   (6  1    1  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.

A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.

   

A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.   
                   2011     
£m
     2010    
£m
  2009 
£m
 
                   2012     
£m
     2011    
£m
  2010 
£m
 

Profit before tax

Profit before tax

  

   390    328    201  

Profit before tax

  

   546    390    328  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Tax at applicable rate 26.5% (2010: 28%; 2009: 28%)

  

   103    92    56  

Tax at applicable rate 24.5% (2011: 26.5%; 2010: 28.0%)

Tax at applicable rate 24.5% (2011: 26.5%; 2010: 28.0%)

  

   134    103    92  

Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures

Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures

  

   (107  (96  (60

Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures

  

   (137  (107  (96

Other

Other

  

   5    5    10  

Other

  

   (3  5    5  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Tax expense

  

   1    1    6  

Tax (credit)/expense

Tax (credit)/expense

  

   (6  1    1  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

9. Equity dividends

9. Equity dividends

        

        

9. Equity dividends

        

        
Ordinary dividends declared in the year      2011    
pence
       2010    
pence
       2009    
pence
        2011     
£m
     2010    
£m
  2009 
£m
       2012    
pence
       2011    
pence
       2010    
pence
        2012     
£m
     2011    
£m
  2010 
£m
 

Ordinary shares

                    

Final for prior financial year

   15.0p     15.0p     15.0p     180    180    163     15.9p     15.0p     15.0p     191    180    180  

Interim for financial year

   5.65p     5.4p     5.4p     68    65    65     6.0p     5.65p     5.4p     73    68    65  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   20.65p     20.4p     20.4p     248    245    228     21.9p     20.65p     20.4p     264    248    245  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC have proposed a final dividend of 15.9p (2010: 15.0p; 2009: 15.0p). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend is expected to be £191 million. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.

    

The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC have proposed a final dividend of 17.0p (2011: 15.9p; 2010: 15.0p). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend is expected to be £202 million. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.

The directors of Reed Elsevier PLC have proposed a final dividend of 17.0p (2011: 15.9p; 2010: 15.0p). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend is expected to be £202 million. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.

    

Ordinary dividends paid and proposed
relating to the financial year
                   2011     
pence
    2010     
pence
 2009
pence
                    2012     
pence
     2011    
pence
 2010
pence
 

Ordinary shares

                    

Interim (paid)

Interim (paid)

  

   5.65p    5.4p    5.4p  

Interim (paid)

  

   6.0p    5.65p    5.4p  

Final (proposed)

Final (proposed)

  

   15.9p    15.0p    15.0p  

Final (proposed)

  

   17.0p    15.9p    15.0p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

Total

  

   21.55p    20.4p    20.4p  

Total

  

   23.0p    21.55p    20.4p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

10. Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)

10. Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)

      

        

10. Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)

      

        
              2011               2012 
              Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
 Earnings
£m
 EPS
pence
               Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
 Earnings
£m
 EPS
pence
 

Basic EPS

Basic EPS

  

   1,202.0    389    32.4p  

Basic EPS

  

   1,200.6    552    46.0p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted EPS

Diluted EPS

  

   1,211.7    389    32.1p  

Diluted EPS

  

   1,215.1    552    45.4p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 
              2010               2011 
              Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
 Earnings
£m
 EPS
pence
               Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
 Earnings
£m
 EPS
pence
 

Basic EPS

Basic EPS

  

   1,199.1    327    27.3p  

Basic EPS

  

   1,202.0    389    32.4p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted EPS

Diluted EPS

  

   1,205.1    327    27.1p  

Diluted EPS

  

   1,211.7    389    32.1p  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

10.Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”) – (continued)

 

  2009   2010 
  Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
£m
   EPS
pence
   Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
£m
   EPS
pence
 

Basic EPS

   1,131.4     195     17.2p     1,199.1     327     27.3p  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Diluted EPS

   1,139.5     195     17.1p     1,205.1     327     27.1p  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The diluted EPS figures are calculated after taking account of the effect of potential additional ordinary shares arising from share options and conditional shares.

The weighted average number of shares is after deducting shares held in treasury. Movements in the number of shares in issue net of treasury shares for the year ended December 31, 20112012 are shown below.

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  Shares in
issue
(millions)
   Treasury
shares
(millions)
 2011
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2010
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2009
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   Shares in
issue
(millions)
   Treasury
shares
(millions)
 2012
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
 2011
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2010
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
 

Number of ordinary shares

                 

At January 1

   1,249.3     (48.9  1,200.4     1,197.7     1,082.6     1,250.9     (48.3  1,202.6    1,200.4     1,197.7  

Issue of ordinary shares

   1.6         1.6     2.0     110.4     6.7         6.7    1.6     2.0  

Net release of shares by employee benefit trust

        0.6    0.6     0.7     4.7  

Repurchase of ordinary shares

        (23.3  (23.3         

Net release of shares by the employee benefit trust

        0.6    0.6    0.6     0.7  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

At December 31

   1,250.9     (48.3  1,202.6     1,200.4     1,197.7     1,257.6     (71.0  1,186.6    1,202.6     1200.4  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Weighted average number of equivalent ordinary shares during the year

      1,202.0     1,199.1     1,131.4        1,200.6    1,202.0     1,199.1  
     

 

   

 

   

 

      

 

  

 

   

 

 

The weighted average number of shares used in the diluted EPS calculations above is after deducting shares held in treasury and is derived as follows:

 

  2011
(millions)
 2010
(millions)
 2009
(millions)
   2012
(millions)
 2011
(millions)
 2010
(millions)
 

Weighted average number of shares — Basic

   1,202.0    1,199.1    1,131.4     1,200.6    1,202.0    1,199.1  

Weighted average number of dilutive shares under option

   9.7    6.0    8.1     14.5    9.7    6.0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of shares — Diluted

   1,211.7    1,205.1    1,139.5     1,215.1    1,211.7    1,205.1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

11. Statement of cash flows

Reconciliation of profit before tax to cash used by operations

        
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Profit before tax

   390    328    201     546    390    328  

Effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings

   13    13    12     14    13    13  

Net finance income

   (1  (1  (2   (1  (1  (1

Share of results of joint ventures

   (404  (342  (213   (561  (404  (342
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash used by operations

   (2  (2  (2   (2  (2  (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

11.Statement of cash flows – (continued)

 

Reconciliation of net funding balances due from joint ventures

 

              2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
               2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

At January 1

  

   274    521    777  

At January 1

  

   632    274    521  

Cash flow

Cash flow

  

   358    (247  (256

Cash flow

  

   317    358    (247
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

At December 31

  

   632    274    521  

At December 31

  

   949    632    274  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

12. Investments in joint ventures

          

12. Investments in joint ventures

      

        
      2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
       2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Share of results of joint ventures

Share of results of joint ventures

  

   404    342    213  

Share of results of joint ventures

  

   561    404    342  

Share of joint ventures’:

                    

Net (expense)/income recognised directly in equity

  

   (14  25    (3

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

  

   (23        

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

  

           1  

Other comprehensive (expense)/income

Other comprehensive (expense)/income

  

   (146  (14  25  

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interests

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interests

  

   3    (23    

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

  

   14    (4  9  

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

  

   16    14    (4

Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

  

           (2

Equalisation adjustments

Equalisation adjustments

  

   (18  (13  (12

Equalisation adjustments

  

   (8  (18  (13

Dividends received from joint ventures

Dividends received from joint ventures

  

   (600  (589    

Dividends received from joint ventures

  

   (694  (600  (589

Increase in investment in joint ventures

Increase in investment in joint ventures

  

       596    462  

Increase in investment in joint ventures

  

           596  

Increase/(decrease) in net funding balances due from joint ventures

Increase/(decrease) in net funding balances due from joint ventures

  

   358    (247  (256

Increase/(decrease) in net funding balances due from joint ventures

  

   317    358    (247
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net movement in the year

Net movement in the year

  

   121    110    412  

Net movement in the year

  

   49    121    110  

At January 1

At January 1

  

   1,037    927    515  

At January 1

  

   1,158    1,037    927  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

At December 31

  

   1,158    1,037    927  

At December 31

  

   1,207    1,158    1,037  
        

 

  

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

  

 

 

During the year the company received a dividend of £600 million from Reed Elsevier Group plc.

Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ 52.9% share is set out below.

  

   

During the year the company received dividends of £394 million from Elsevier Reed Finance BV and £300 million from Reed Elsevier Group plc.

Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ 52.9% share is set out below.

During the year the company received dividends of £394 million from Elsevier Reed Finance BV and £300 million from Reed Elsevier Group plc.

Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ 52.9% share is set out below.

   

   

  Total joint ventures   Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ share   Total joint ventures       Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ share      
  2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
   2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Revenue

   6,002     6,055     6,071     3,175    3,203    3,212     6,116     6,002     6,055     3,235    3,175    3,203  

Net profit for the year

   767     648     395     404    342    213     1,074     767     648     561    404    342  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

12.Investments in joint ventures – (continued)

 

Reed Elsevier PLC’s share of joint ventures’ net profit attributable to parent company shareholders for the year excludes the net lossprofit that arose directly in Reed Elsevier PLC of £5 million (2011: £2 million (2010:loss; 2010: £2 million; 2009: £6 million)million loss).

 

  Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’
share
   Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ share 
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

Total assets

   11,503    11,158    11,334    6,085    5,903    5,996     11,014    11,503    11,158    5,826    6,085    5,903  

Total liabilities

   (9,306  (9,188  (9,575  (5,559  (5,140  (5,590   (8,700  (9,306  (9,188  (5,568  (5,559  (5,140
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets

   2,197    1,970    1,759    526    763    406     2,314    2,197    1,970    258    526    763  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Attributable to:

              

Joint ventures

   2,172    1,943    1,732    526    763    406     2,280    2,172    1,943    258    526    763  

Non-controlling interests

   25    27    27                 34    25    27              
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   2,197    1,970    1,759    526    763    406     2,314    2,197    1,970    258    526    763  
  

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

    

Funding balances due from joint ventures

      632    274    521        949    632    274  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

      1,158    1,037    927        1,207    1,158    1,037  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

The above amounts exclude assets and liabilities held directly by Reed Elsevier PLC and include the counterparty balances of amounts owed to and by other Reed Elsevier businesses. Included within Reed Elsevier PLC’s share of assets and liabilities are cash and cash equivalents of £339 million (2011: £384 million (2010:million; 2010: £393 million; 2009: £388 million) and borrowings of £2,059 million (2011: £2,265 million (2010:million; 2010: £2,276 million; 2009: £2,849 million) respectively.

 

13.Share capital

 

  No. of
shares
   £m   No. of
shares
       £m     

Authorised

        

Ordinary shares of 14 51/116p each

   1,250,913,565     180     1,257,597,977     181  

Unclassified shares of 14 51/116p each

   787,158,643     114     787,158,643     113  
    

 

     

 

 

Total

     294       294  
    

 

     

 

 

All of the ordinary shares rank equally with respect to voting rights and rights to receive dividends. There are no restrictions on the rights to transfer shares.

Called up share capital — issued and fully paid

 

 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 No. of shares £m No. of shares £m No. of shares £m  No. of shares £m No. of shares £m No. of shares £m 

At January 1

  1,249,286,224    180    1,247,275,833    180    1,136,924,693    164    1,250,913,565    180    1,249,286,224    180    1,247,275,833    180  

Issue of ordinary shares

  1,627,341        2,010,391        110,351,140    16    6,684,412    1    1,627,341        2,010,391      
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

  1,250,913,565    180    1,249,286,224    180    1,247,275,833    180    1,257,597,977    181    1,250,913,565    180    1,249,286,224    180  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The issue of ordinary shares relates to the exercise of share options and the 2009 share placing.options. Details of share option and conditional share schemes are set out in note 8 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

A share placing was announced on July 30, 2009 for up to 109,198,190 new ordinary shares representing approximately 9.9% of the company’s share capital prior to the placing. The shares were fully subscribed at a price of 405p per share, raising £435 million net of issue costs of £7 million. No share premium was recognised as the company took advantages of section 612 within the Companies Act 2006 regarding merger relief. Accordingly, the excess of the net proceeds received over the nominal value of the share capital issued is added to other reserves rather than credited to the share premium account and is distributable.

Details of shares held in treasury are provided in note 15.

14.Share premium

 

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   1,168    1,159    1,154     1,176    1,168    1,159  

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

   8    9    5     32    8    9  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   1,176    1,168    1,159     1,208    1,176    1,168  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

15. Shares held in treasury

        
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   312    317    347     308    312    317  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

   (4  (5  (30

Repurchase of ordinary shares

   143          

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

   (4  (4  (5
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   308    312    317     447    308    312  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Further details of shares held in treasury are provided in note 31 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

16. Capital redemption reserve

  

      

At December 31, 2012, shares held in treasury related to 13,451,468 (2011: 14,051,025, 2010: 14,654,161) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”); and 57,484,915 (2011: 34,196,298, 2010: 34,196,298) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares held by the parent company.

The EBT purchases Reed Elsevier PLC shares which, at the Trustees’ discretion, can be used in respect of the exercise of share options and to meet commitments under conditional shares awards. At December 31, 2012, Reed Elsevier PLC shares held by the EBT were £84 million (2011: £88 million; 2010: £92 million).

16. Capital redemption reserve

At December 31, 2012, shares held in treasury related to 13,451,468 (2011: 14,051,025, 2010: 14,654,161) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”); and 57,484,915 (2011: 34,196,298, 2010: 34,196,298) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares held by the parent company.

The EBT purchases Reed Elsevier PLC shares which, at the Trustees’ discretion, can be used in respect of the exercise of share options and to meet commitments under conditional shares awards. At December 31, 2012, Reed Elsevier PLC shares held by the EBT were £84 million (2011: £88 million; 2010: £92 million).

16. Capital redemption reserve

    

    

      

  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1 and December 31

   4    4    4     4    4    4  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

17. Translation reserve

        
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   142    92    157     159    142    92  

Share of joint ventures’ exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

   17    50    (65   (72  17    50  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   159    142    92     87    159    142  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

18. Other reserves

        
  2011
£m
 2010
£m
 2009
£m
   2012
£m
 2011
£m
 2010
£m
 

At January 1

   (154  (202  (628   (62  (154  (202

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

   389    327    195     552    389    327  

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

           419  

Share of joint ventures’:

        

Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension schemes

   (60  (33  3  

Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes

   (174  (60  (33

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

   (1               (1    

Fair value movements on disposal of available for sale investments

           1  

Transfer to net profit on disposals of available for sale investments

   6          

Fair value movements on cash flow hedges

   (12  (31  28     37    (12  (31

Tax recognised directly in equity

   22    15    (13   46    22    15  

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

   14    (4  9     16    14    (4

Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

   (4  (5  (32

Acquisition of non-controlling interest

   (23        

Transfer to net profit from hedge reserve

   20    24    44  

Settlement of share awards

   (4  (4  (5

Transfer to net profit from cash flow hedge reserve

   11    20    24  

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interest

   3    (23    

Equalisation adjustments

   (5           6    (5    

Equity dividends paid

   (248  (245  (228   (264  (248  (245
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   (62  (154  (202   173    (62  (154
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

19.Contingent liabilities

There are contingent liabilities in respect of borrowings of joint ventures guaranteed by Reed Elsevier PLC as follows:

 

   2011
£m
   2010
£m
   2009
£m
 

Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier NV

   3,920     3,924     4,381  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
£m
   2011
£m
   2010
£m
 

Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier NV

   3,595     3,920     3,924  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial instruments disclosures in respect of the borrowings covered by the above guarantees are given in note 19 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

 

20.Approval of financial statements

The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of directors on 15 February 2012.

27, 2013.

 

 

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the members of the Supervisory and Executive Boards and the shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Reed Elsevier NV and its subsidiaries (“the Company”(the “Company”) as ofat December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the related consolidated income statements, and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Reed Elsevier NV and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, and the results of itstheir operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 15, 201227, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE ACCOUNTANTS B.V.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

February 15, 201227, 2013

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   Note   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Administrative expenses

   4     (2  (2  (2   4     (2  (2  (2

Share of results of joint ventures

   12     420    367    197     12     654    420    367  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating profit

     418    365    195       652    418    365  

Finance income

   7     20    14    22     7     8    20    14  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

     438    379    217       660    438    379  

Taxation

   8     (1  (3  2     8     (2  (1  (3
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

     437    376    219  

Profit attributable to shareholders

     658    437    376  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
 

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

   437     376     219  

Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive income for the year

   20     71     42  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

   457     447     261  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
€m
  2011
€m
   2010
€m
 

Profit attributable to shareholders

   658    437     376  

Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year

   (137  20     71  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

   521    457     447  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

  Note   2011   2010   2009   Note   2012   2011   2010 

Earnings per ordinary share (EPS)

        

Earnings per share (“EPS”)

        

Basic earnings per share

   10    0.59    0.51    0.32     10    0.90    0.59    0.51  

Diluted earnings per share

   10    0.59    0.51    0.31     10    0.89    0.59    0.51  

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   Note   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Cash flows from operating activities

            

Cash used by operations

   11     (3  (1  (2   11     (5  (3  (1

Interest received

     20    14    24       6    20    14  

Tax paid

     (5  (4  (8     (2  (5  (4
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash from operating activities

     12    9    14  

Net cash (used in)/from operating activities

     (1  12    9  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

            

Dividends received from joint ventures

   12         1,093         12     754        1,093  

Increase in investment in joint ventures

   12         (719  (531   12             (719
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities

         374    (531

Net cash from investing activities

     754        374  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

            

Equity dividends paid

   9     (289  (281  (260   9     (319  (289  (281

Repurchase of shares

     (141        

Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares

     2    2    470       18    2    2  

Decrease/(increase) in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   11     275    (104  298  

(Increase)/decrease in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   11     (313  275    (104
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash (used in)/from financing activities

     (12  (383  508  

Net cash used in financing activities

     (755  (12  (383
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

             (9     (2        
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     3    3    12       3    3    3  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

     3    3    3       1    3    3  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS AT DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   Note   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Non-current assets

            

Investments in joint ventures

   12     1,359    1,198    1,031     12     1,455    1,359    1,198  

Current assets

            

Amounts due from joint ventures

     2    2    2       4    2    2  

Cash and cash equivalents

     3    3    3       1    3    3  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
     5    5    5       5    5    5  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

     1,364    1,203    1,036       1,460    1,364    1203  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Current liabilities

            

Payables

   13     10    11    10     13     7    10    11  

Taxation

     51    55    56       51    51    55  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

     61    66    66       58    61    66  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets

     1,303    1,137    970       1,402    1,303    1,137  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Capital and reserves

            

Share capital issued

   14     54    54    53     14     54    54    54  

Paid-in surplus

   15     2,171    2,169    2,168     15     2,189    2,171    2,169  

Shares held in treasury (including in joint ventures)

   16     (432  (433  (434   16     (571  (432  (433

Translation reserve

   17     6    (51  (153   17     (42  6    (51

Other reserves

   18     (496  (602  (664   18     (228  (496  (602
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

     1,303    1,137    970       1,402    1,303    1,137  
    

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER NV

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

 

  Note   Share
capital
€m
   Paid-in
surplus
€m
   Shares
held in
treasury
€m
 Translation
reserve

€m
 Other
reserves
€m
 Total
equity
€m
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

     54     2,171     (432  6    (496  1,303  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   (51  572    521  

Equity dividends paid

   9                       (319  (319

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

          18                 18  

Repurchase of shares

               (141          (141

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       19    19  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

               5        (5    

Share of joint ventures’ disposal of non-controlling interest

                       4    4  

Equalisation adjustments

                       (3  (3

Exchange translation difference

               (3  3          
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

     54     2,189     (571  (42  (228  1,402  
  Note   Share
capital
€m
   Paid-in
surplus
€m
   Shares
held in
treasury
��m
 Translation
reserve
€m
 Other
reserves
€m
 Total
equity
€m
     

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2011

     54     2,169     (433  (51  (602  1,137       54     2,169     (433  (51  (602  1,137  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   54    403    457                     54    403    457  

Equity dividends paid

   9                       (289  (289   9                       (289  (289

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

          2                 2            2                 2  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

               4        (4    

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       16    16                         16    16  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

               4        (4    

Share of joint ventures’ acquisition of non-controlling interest

                       (25  (25                       (25  (25

Equalisation adjustments

                       5    5                         5    5  

Exchange translation difference

               (3  3                         (3  3          
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

     54     2,171     (432  6    (496  1,303       54     2,171     (432  6    (496  1,303  
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2010

     53     2,168     (434  (153  (664  970       53     2,168     (434  (153  (664  970  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   98    349    447                     98    349    447  

Equity dividends paid

   9                       (281  (281   9                       (281  (281

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

     1     1                 2       1     1                 2  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

               5        (5    

Share of joint ventures’ decrease in share based remuneration reserve

                       (4  (4                       (4  (4

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

               5        (5    

Equalisation adjustments

                       3    3                         3    3  

Exchange translation differences

               (4  4                         (4  4          
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

     54     2,169     (433  (51  (602  1,137       54     2,169     (433  (51  (602  1,137  
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2009

     49     1,712     (477  (138  (655  491  

Total comprehensive income for the year

                   (25  286    261  

Equity dividends paid

   9                       (260  (260

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

     4     456     21        (11  470  

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

               32        (34  (2

Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based remuneration reserve

                       10    10  

Exchange translation differences

               (10  10          
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

     53     2,168     (434  (153  (664  970  
    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

REED ELSEVIER NV

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.Basis of financial statements

These consolidated financial statements report the consolidated income statement, cash flowOn January 1, 1993 Reed Elsevier PLC and financial position of Reed Elsevier NV contributed their businesses to two companies, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV. Reed Elsevier Group plc, which have been prepared underowns all the historical cost convention.

Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts shownpublishing and information businesses, is incorporated in England and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, which owns the financing and treasury companies, is incorporated in the consolidated financial statements are stated in euros (“€”). Certain disclosures required to comply with Dutch statutory reporting requirements have been omitted.

TheNetherlands. Reed Elsevier combined financial statements on pages F-3 to F-53 formPLC and Reed Elsevier NV each hold a 50% interest in Reed Elsevier Group plc. Reed Elsevier PLC holds a 39% interest in Elsevier Reed Finance BV with Reed Elsevier NV holding a 61% interest. Reed Elsevier PLC additionally holds an integral partindirect equity interest in Reed Elsevier NV, reflecting the arrangements entered into between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV at the time of the notes tomerger, which determined the equalisation ratio whereby one Reed Elsevier NV’s consolidated financial statements.NV ordinary share is, in broad terms, intended to confer equivalent economic interests to 1.538 Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares.

As a consequence of the merger of the company’s businesses with those of Reed Elsevier PLC, the shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC can be regarded as having the interests of a single economic group, enjoying substantially equivalent ordinary dividend and capital rights in the earnings and net assets of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses.

Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts shown in the consolidated financial statements are stated in euros (“€”). Certain disclosures required to comply with Dutch statutory reporting requirements have been omitted.

The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements on pages F-3 to F-53 form an integral part of the notes to Reed Elsevier NV’s consolidated financial statements.

 

2.Accounting policies

Basis of Preparation

These consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared under the historic cost convention, report the consolidated statements of income, cash flow and financial position of Reed Elsevier NV, and have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies that are in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)(“IASB”) and as adopted by the European Union (EU).Union.

Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts shown in the financial statements are in euros (“€”).

The basis of the merger of the businesses of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV is set out on page 11.

Reed Elsevier NV’s consolidated financial statements are presented incorporating Reed Elsevier NV’s investments in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses accounted for using the equity method, as adjusted for the effects of the equalisation arrangement between Reed Elsevier NV and Reed Elsevier PLC. The arrangement lays down the distribution of dividends and net assets in such a way that Reed Elsevier NV’s share in the profit and net assets of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses equals 50%, with all settlements accruing to shareholders from the equalisation arrangements taken directly to reserves.

Because the dividend paid to shareholders by Reed Elsevier NV is, other than in special circumstances, equivalent to the Reed Elsevier PLC dividend plus the UK tax credit received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders, Reed Elsevier NV normally distributes a higher proportion of the combined profit attributable than Reed Elsevier PLC. Reed Elsevier PLC’s share in this difference in dividend distributions is settled with Reed Elsevier NV and is credited directly to consolidated reserves under equalisation. Reed Elsevier NV can pay a nominal dividend on its R shares held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC that is lower than the dividend on the ordinary shares. Equally, Reed Elsevier NV has the possibility to receive dividends directly from Dutch affiliates. Reed Elsevier PLC is compensated by direct dividend payments by Reed Elsevier Group plc. The settlements flowing from these arrangements are also taken directly to consolidated reserves under equalisation.

Combined financial statements

The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the combined financial statements are set out on pages F-10 to F-17.

Basis of valuation of assets and liabilities

Reed Elsevier NV’s 50% economic interest in the net assets of the combined businesses has been shown on the consolidated statement of financial position as investments in joint ventures, net of the assets and liabilities reported as part of Reed Elsevier NV. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.

Assets and liabilities are stated at historical cost, less provision, if appropriate, for any impairment in value.

2.Accounting policies – (continued)

 

Foreign exchange translation

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each statement of financial position date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial position date. Exchange differences arising are recorded in the income statement. The gains or losses relating to the retranslation of Reed Elsevier NV’s 50% interest in the net assets of the combined businesses are classified as equity and transferred to the translation reserve.

When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative translation differences are recognised within the income statement in the period.

Taxation

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior year taxable profits and the movements on deferred tax that are recognised in the income statement. Tax arising in joint ventures is included in the share of results of joint ventures.

The tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using the applicable tax rate that has been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the date of the statement of financial position.

Deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts, it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is not recognised on temporary differences in respect of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes.

Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would become payable on the distribution of retained profits from foreign subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.

Movements in deferred tax are charged or credited in the income statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised in equity. Deferred tax credits in respect of share based remuneration are recognised in equity to the extent that expected tax deduction exceed the related expense.

Critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

Critical judgments in the preparation of the combined financial statements are set out on pages F-14 to F-16.

Standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective

Recently issued standards, amendments and interpretations and their impact on future accounting policies and reporting have been considered on pages F-16 and F-17F16 to F17 of the combined financial statements.

 

3.Basis of preparation

The consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV reflect the 50% economic interest that its shareholders have under the equalisation arrangements in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, accounted for on an equity basis.

The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, which is the functional currency of Reed Elsevier Group plc, a UK registered company which owns the publishing and information businesses of Reed Elsevier. The following analysis presents how the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier NV, presented in euros, are derived from the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

 

Reed Elsevier NV consolidated profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

  Note  2011   2010   2009 

Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders in pounds sterling

    £760m    £642m    £391m  

Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders in euros

    874m    751m    438m  

Reed Elsevier NV’s 50% share of combined net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

    437m    376m    219m  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reed Elsevier NV consolidated profit attributable to shareholders

  2012   2011   2010 

Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders in pounds sterling

  £1,069m    £760m    £642m  

Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders translated into euros at year end exchange rates (2012: €1.23 to £1.00; 2011: €1.15 to £1.00; 2010: €1.17 to £1.00)

  1,315m    874m    751m  

Reed Elsevier NV’s 50% share of combined net profit attributable to shareholders

   €658m    437m    376m  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

3.Basis of preparation – (continued)

 

Reed Elsevier NV consolidated total equity

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Reed Elsevier combined shareholders’ equity in pounds sterling

  £2,172m    £1,943m    £1,732m    £2,280m    £2,172m    £1,943m  

Reed Elsevier combined shareholders’ equity in pounds sterling translated into euros at year end exchange rates (2011: €1.15 to £1.00; 2010: €1.17 to £1.00; 2009: €1.12 to £1.00)

  2,606m    2,273m    1,940m  

Reed Elsevier combined shareholders’ equity in pounds sterling translated into euros at year end exchange rates (2012: €1.23 to £1.00; 2011: €1.15 to £1.00; 2010: €1.17 to £1.00)

  2,804m    2,606m    2,273m  

Reed Elsevier NV’s 50% share of combined equity

  1,303m    1,137m    970m    1,402m    1,303m    1,137m  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

4.Administrative expenses

Administrative expenses are stated afterinclude the gross remuneration for present and former directors of Reed Elsevier NV in respect of services rendered to Reed Elsevier NV and the combined businesses. Fees for members of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier NV of €0.3 million (2010:(2011: €0.3 million; 2009: €0.22010: €0.3 million) are included in gross remuneration. Insofar as gross remuneration is related to services rendered to Reed Elsevier Group plc group and Elsevier Reed Finance BV group, it is borne by these groups. Reed Elsevier NV has no employees (2010:(2011: nil; 2009:2010: nil).

 

5.Auditor’s remuneration

Audit fees payable by Reed Elsevier NV were €50,000 (2010: €48,000; 2009:€142,000 (2011: €50,000; 2010: €48,000). Further information on the audit and non audit fees paid by the Reed Elsevier combined businesses to Deloitte Accountants B.V. and its associates is set out in note 5 to the combined financial statements.

 

6.Related party transactions

All transactions with joint ventures, which are related parties of Reed Elsevier NV, are reflected in these financial statements. Key management personnel are also related parties and comprise the members of the Executive Board of Reed Elsevier NV. Transactions with key management personnel are set out in note 34 to the combined financial statements.

 

7.Finance income

 

   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
 

Finance income from joint ventures

   20     14     22  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
 

Finance income from joint ventures

   8     20     14  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

8.Taxation

A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Profit before tax

   438    379    217     660    438    379  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Tax at applicable rate 25.0% (2010: 25.5%; 2009: 25.5%)

   110    97    55  

Tax at applicable rate 25.0% (2011: 25.0%; 2010: 25.5%)

   165    110    97  

Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures

   (105  (94  (50   (163  (105  (94

Other

   (4      (7       (4    
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Tax expense/(credit)

   1    3    (2

Tax expense

   2    1    3  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

9.Equity dividends

 

Ordinary dividends declared in the year  2011
   2010
   2009
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
 
Dividends declared in the year  2012
   2011
   2010
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
 

Ordinary shares

                        

Final for prior financial year

  0.303    0.293    0.290     212     205     185    0.326    0.303    0.293     228     212     205  

Interim for financial year

  0.110    0.109    0.107     77     76     75    0.130    0.110    0.109     91     77     76  

R shares

                                                            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  0.413    0.402    0.397     289     281     260    0.456    0.413    0.402     319     289     281  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

9.Equity dividends – (continued)

 

The directors of Reed Elsevier NV have proposed a final dividend of €0.326 (2010: €0.303; 2009: €0.293)€0.337 (2011: €0.326; 2010: €0.303). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend is expected to be €228€232 million. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.

 

Ordinary dividends paid and proposed relating to the financial year  2011
   2010
   2009
 
Dividends paid and proposed relating to the financial year  2012
   2011
   2010
 

Ordinary shares

            

Interim (paid)

  0.110    0.109    0.107     €0.130    0.110    0.109  

Final (proposed)

  0.326    0.293    0.293     €0.337    0.326    0.293  

R shares

   

  
                         
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  0.436    0.402    0.400     €0.467    0.436    0.402  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

10.Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)

 

   2012 
   Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
€m
   EPS
 

Basic EPS

   734.0     658    0.90  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

   742.1     658    0.89  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2011 
   Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
€m
   EPS
 

Basic EPS

   735.3     437    0.59  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

   740.8     437    0.59  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

   2010 
   Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
€m
   EPS
 

Basic EPS

   734.5     376    0.51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

   737.8     376    0.51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2009 
   Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
   Earnings
€m
   EPS
 

Basic EPS

   693.9     219    0.32  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

   698.7     219    0.31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The diluted EPS figures are calculated after taking account of the effect of potential additional ordinary shares arising from share options and conditional shares.

10.Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”) – (continued)

 

The weighted average number of shares reflects the equivalent ordinary shares amount taking into account R shares and is after deducting shares held in treasury. Movements in the number of ordinary shares in issue net of treasury sharesor equivalents for the year ended December 31, 20112012 are shown below.

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  Shares in
issue
(millions)
   Treasury
shares
(millions)
 2011
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2010
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2009
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   Ordinary
shares in
issue
(millions)
   R shares
in issue
(millions)
   Treasury
shares
(millions)
 2012
Ordinary
share
equivalents
net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
 2011
Ordinary
shares
equivalents
net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
   2010
Ordinary
shares
equivalents
net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
 

Number of ordinary shares

         

Number of ordinary shares or equivalents

          

At January 1

   723.9     (31.7  692.2     691.5     625.4     724.1     43.0     (31.3  735.8    735.2     734.5  

Issue of ordinary shares

   0.2         0.2     0.2     63.1     1.9              1.9    0.2     0.2  

Net release of shares by employee benefit trust

        0.4    0.4     0.5     3.0  

Repurchase of ordinary and R shares

             (13.3  (13.3         

Net release of shares by the employee benefit trust

             0.4    0.4    0.4     0.5  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

At December 31

   724.1     (31.3  692.8     692.2     691.5     726.0     43.0     (44.2  724.8    735.8     735.2  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Weighted average number of equivalent ordinary shares during the year

      735.3     734.5     693.9          734.0    735.3     734.5  
     

 

   

 

   

 

        

 

  

 

   

 

 

The average number of equivalent ordinary shares takes into account the R shares in the company held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC, which represents a 5.8% interest in the company’s share capital.

Treasury shares include 62,341 R shares (2011: nil; 2010: nil), equivalent to 623,410 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.

At December 31, 2012 4,240,838 R shares were held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC. The R shares are convertible at the election of the holders into ten ordinary shares each and each R share carries an entitlement to cast ten votes. They have otherwise the same rights as the ordinary shares, except that Reed Elsevier NV may pay a lower dividend on the R shares.

The weighted average number of shares used in the calculation of diluted EPS is after deducting shares held in treasury and is derived as follows:

 

  2011
(millions)
   2010
(millions)
   2009
(millions)
   2012
(millions)
   2011
(millions)
   2010
(millions)
 

Weighted average number of shares — Basic

   735.3     734.5     693.9     734.0     735.3     734.5  

Weighted average number of dilutive shares under options

   5.5     3.3     4.8     8.1     5.5     3.3  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Weighted average number of shares — Diluted

   740.8     737.8     698.7     742.1     740.8     737.8  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

11.Statement of cash flows

Reconciliation of profit before tax to cash used by operations

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Profit before tax

   438    379    217     660    438    379  

Finance income

   (20  (14  (22   (8  (20  (14

Share of results of joint ventures

   (420  (367  (197   (654  (420  (367

(Decrease)/increase in payables

   (1  1         (3  (1  1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash used by operations

   (3  (1  (2   (5  (3  (1
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

11.Statement of cash flows – (continued)

Reconciliation of net funding balances due from joint ventures

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
   2009
€m
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

At January 1

   1,359    1,255     1,553     1,084     1,359    1,255  

Cash flow

   (275  104     (298   313     (275  104  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   1,084    1,359     1,255     1,397     1,084    1,359  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

12.Investments in joint ventures

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Share of results of joint ventures

   420    367    197     654    420    367  

Share of joint ventures’:

        

Net income recognised directly in equity

   20    71    41  

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

           1  

Other comprehensive (expense)/income

   (137  20    71  

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interests

   4    (25    

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

   16    (4  10     19    16    (4

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

   (25        

Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

           (2

Equalisation adjustments

   5    3         (3  5    3  

Dividends received from joint ventures

       (1,093       (754      (1,093

Increase in investment in joint ventures

       719    531             719  

(Decrease)/increase in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   (275  104    (298

Increase/(decrease) in net funding balances due from joint ventures

   313    (275  104  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net movement in the year

   161    167    480     96    161    167  

At January 1

   1,198    1,031    551     1,359    1,198    1,031  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   1,359    1,198    1,031     1,455    1,359    1,198  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

During the year the company received dividends of €754 million from Elsevier Reed Finance BV.

Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ 50% share is set out below:

 

  Total joint ventures   Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ share   Total joint ventures   Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ share 
  2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
 

Revenue

   6,902     7,084     6,800     3,451     3,542     3,400     7,523     6,902     7,084     3,762     3,451     3,542  

Net profit for the year

   882     758     442     420     367     197     1,321     882     758     654     420     367  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Reed Elsevier NV’s share of joint ventures’ net profit attributable to parent company shareholders for the year excludes the net profit that arose directly in Reed Elsevier NV of €4 million (2011: €17 million (2010:million; 2010: €9 million; 2009: €22 million).

 

  Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ share   Total joint ventures Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ share 
  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

Total assets

   13,804    13,055    12,694    6,897    6,523    6,342     13,547    13,804    13,055    6,773    6,897    6,523  

Total liabilities

   (11,168  (10,750  (10,724  (6,622  (6,684  (6,566   (10,701  (11,168  (10,750  (6,715  (6,622  (6,684
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net assets/(liabilities)

   2,636    2,305    1,970    275    (161  (224   2,846    2,636    2,305    58    275    (161
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Attributable to:

              

Joint ventures

   2,606    2,273    1,940    275    (161  (224   2,804    2,606    2,273    58    275    (161

Non-controlling interests

   30    32    30                 42    30    32              
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   2,636    2,305    1,970    275    (161  (224   2,846    2,636    2,305    58    275    (161
  

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

    

Net funding balances due from joint ventures

      1,084    1,359    1,255        1,397    1,084    1,359  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

      1,359    1,198    1,031        1,455    1,359    1,198  
     

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

 

12.Investments in joint ventures – (continued)

The above amounts exclude assets and liabilities held directly by Reed Elsevier NV and include the counterparty balances of amounts owed to and by other Reed Elsevier businesses. Included within Reed Elsevier NV’s share of assets and liabilities are cash and cash equivalents of €393 million (2011: €433 million (2010:million; 2010: €431 million; 2009: €408 million) and borrowings of €2,386 million (2011: €2,561 million (2010:million; 2010: €2,508 million; 2009: €2,625 million) respectively.

13.Payables

Included within payables are employee convertible debenture loans of €7 million (2011: €8 million (2010:million; 2010: €9 million; 2009: €10 million) with a weighted average interest rate of 2.65% (2011: 3.13% (2010: 3.30%; 2009: 4.04%2010: 3.30%). Depending on the conversion terms, the surrender of €200 par value debenture loans qualifies for 50 Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.

 

14.Share capital

Authorised

 

  No. of shares   €m   No. of shares       €m     

Ordinary shares of €0.07 each

   1,800,000,000     126     1,800,000,000     126  

R shares of €0.70 each

   26,000,000     18     26,000,000     18  
    

 

     

 

 

Total

     144       144  
    

 

     

 

 

Issued and fully paid

 

  R shares
Number
   Ordinary
shares
Number
   R shares
€m
   Ordinary
shares
€m
   Total
€m
 

At January 1, 2009

   4,050,720     660,629,462     3     46     49  

Issue of ordinary shares

   252,459     63,063,439          4     4  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   R shares
Number
   Ordinary
shares
Number
   R shares
€m
   Ordinary
shares

€m
       Total    
€m
 

At January 1, 2010

   4,303,179     723,692,901     3     50     53     4,303,179     723,692,901     3     50     53  

Issue of ordinary shares

        184,116          1     1          184,116          1     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At January 1, 2011

   4,303,179     723,877,017     3     51     54     4,303,179     723,877,017     3     51     54  

Issue of ordinary shares

        200,738                         200,738                 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At December 31, 2011

   4,303,179     724,077,755     3     51     54  

At January 1, 2012

   4,303,179     724,077,755     3     51     54  

Issue of ordinary shares

        1,906,470                 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At December 31, 2012

   4,303,179     725,984,225     3     51     54  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The issue of shares relates to the exercise of share options and the 2009 share placing.options. Details of share option and conditional share schemes are set out in note 8 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

A share placing was announced on July 30, 2009 for up to 63,030,989 new ordinary shares representing approximately 9.9% of the company’s share capital prior to the placing. The shares were fully subscribed at a price of €7.08 per share, raising €441 million net of issue costs of €5 million. The excess of the net proceeds received over the nominal value of the share capital issued has been credited to paid-in surplus. 252,459 new R shares were also issued for total proceeds of €18 million.

Details of shares held in treasury are provided in note 16.

At December 31, 2011 4,303,1792012 4,240,838 R shares were held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC. The R shares are convertible at the election of the holders into ten ordinary shares each and each R share carries an entitlement to cast ten votes. They have otherwise the same rights as the ordinary shares, except that Reed Elsevier NV may pay a lower dividend on the R shares.

 

15.Paid-in surplus

 

  2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
       2010    
€m
 

At January 1

   2,169     2,168     1,712     2,171     2,169     2,168  

Issue of ordinary shares

   2     1     456     18     2     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At December 31

   2,171     2,169     2,168     2,189     2,171     2,169  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Within paid-in surplus, an amount of €2,012 million (2011: €1,994 million (2010:million; 2010: €1,992 million; 2009: €1,991 million) is free of tax.

16.Shares held in treasury

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

At January 1

   433    434    477     432    433    434  

Release of R shares from treasury

           (21

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

   (4  (5  (32

Repurchase of ordinary and R shares

   141          

Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by the employee benefit trust

   (5  (4  (5

Exchange translation differences

       4    10     3    3    4  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   429    433    434     571    432    433  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Further details of
16.Shares held in treasury – (continued)

At December 31, 2012, shares held in treasury are provided in note 31related to 6,990,101 (2011: 7,380,906; 2010: 7,781,790) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares held by the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”); and 36,613,087 (2011: 23,952,791; 2010: 23,952,791) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and 62,341 R shares (2011: nil; 2010: nil) held by the parent company.

The EBT purchases Reed Elsevier NV shares which, at the trustees’ discretion, can be used in respect of the exercise of share options and to meet commitments under conditional share awards. At December 31, 2012, Reed Elsevier NV shares held by the EBT were €84 million (2011: €85 million; 2010: €87 million).

 

17.Translation reserve

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

At January 1

   (51  (153  (138   6    (51  (153

Share of joint ventures’ exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

   54    98    (25   (51  54    98  

Exchange translation differences on capital and reserves

   3    4    10     3    3    4  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   6    (51  (153   (42  6    (51
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

18.Other reserves

 

  2011
€m
 2010
€m
 2009
€m
   2012
€m
 2011
€m
 2010
€m
 

At January 1

   (602  (664  (655   (496  (602  (664

Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders

   437    376    219  

Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses

           (11

Profit attributable to shareholders

   658    437    376  

Share of joint ventures’:

        

Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension schemes

   (65  (37  4  

Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes

   (203  (65  (37

Fair value movements on available for sale investments

   (1               (1    

Fair value movements on disposal of available for sale investments

           1  

Transfer to net profit on disposal of available for sale investments

   7          

Fair value movements on cash flow hedges

   (14  (34  29     43    (14  (34

Tax recognised directly in equity

   24    17    (14   54    24    17  

Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve

   16    (4  10     19    16    (4

Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust

   (4  (5  (34

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

   (25        

Transfer to net profit from hedge reserve

   22    27    47  

Settlement of share awards

   (5  (4  (5

Transfer to net profit from cash flow hedge reserve

   13    22    27  

Disposal/(acquisition) of non-controlling interests

   4    (25    

Equalisation adjustments

   5    3         (3  5    3  

Equity dividends paid

   (289  (281  (260   (319  (289  (281
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31

   (496  (602  (664   (228  (496  (602
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

19.Contingent liabilities

There are contingent liabilities in respect of borrowings of joint ventures guaranteed by Reed Elsevier NV as follows:

 

   2011
€m
   2010
€m
   2009
€m
 

Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier PLC

   4,704     4,591     4,913  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012
€m
   2011
€m
   2010
€m
 

Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier PLC

   4,422     4,704     4,591  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial instruments disclosures in respect of the borrowings covered by the above guarantees are given in note 19 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.

20.Approval of financial statements

The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Combined Board of directors on 15 February 2012.27, 2013.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

 

Terms used in Annual Report on Form 20-F

US equivalent or brief description

 

Accruals

Accrued expenses

 

Adjusted operating cash flow

Cash generated from operations plus dividends from joint ventures less net capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and internally developed intangible assets, and excluding payments in relation to exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs

 

Adjusted operating margin

Adjusted operating profit expressed as a percentage of revenue. This is a key financial measure used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources

 

Adjusted operating profit

Operating profit before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets, and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, the share of profit on disposals in joint ventures, and grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. This is a key financial measure used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources and is presented in accordance with IFRS8: OperatingIFRS8-Operating Segments

 

Allotted

Issued

 

Associate

An entity in which Reed Elsevier has a participating interest and, in the opinion of the directors, can exercise significant influence on its management

 

Bank borrowings

Payable to banks

 

Called up share capital

Issued share capital

 

Capital and reserves

Shareholders’ equity

 

Cash flow conversion

Adjusted operating cash flow expressed as a percentage of adjusted operating profit

 

Combined businesses

Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

 

Current instalments of loans

Long term debt due within one year

 

Effective tax rate on adjusted operating profit

Tax rate excluding movements on deferred tax balances not expected to crystallise in the near term, more closely aligning with cash taxes payable, and includes the benefit of deductible tax amortisation on acquired goodwill and intangible assets

 

EPS

Earnings per ordinary share

 

Finance lease

Capital lease

 

Free cash flow

Operating cash flow excluding the effects of interest, tax and dividends

 

Invested capital

Average capital employed in the year expressed at the average exchange rates for the year. Capital employed represents the net assets of the business before borrowings and derivative financial instruments and current and deferred taxes, after adding back the cumulative amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill and deducting from goodwill the gross up in respect of deferred tax liabilities recognised on acquisition of intangible assets

 

Investments

Non-current investments

 

Freehold

Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity

 

Interest receivable

Interest income

 

Interest payable

Interest expense

 

Net borrowings

Gross borrowings, less related derivative financial instrument assets and cash and cash equivalents

 

Net cash acquired

Cash less debt acquired with a business

 

Operating costs

Cost of sales plus selling and distribution costs plus administration and other expenses

Prepayments

Prepaid expenses

 

Profit

Income

Profit attributable

Net income

 

Reed Elsevier

Reed Elsevier PLC, Reed Elsevier NV, Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

 

Share based remuneration

Stock based compensation

 

Shareholders’ equity

Shareholders’ funds

 

Share premium account

Premiums paid in excess of par value of ordinary shares

 

Return on invested capital

Post tax adjusted operating profit expressed as a percentage of average capital employed. This is a key financial measure used by management

 

Revenue

Sales

 

Underlying growth

The year on year growth calculated excluding the effects of acquisitions, disposals and the impact of currency translation. This is a key financial measure as it provides an assessment of year on year organic growth without distortion for part year contributions and the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates

ITEM 19: EXHIBITS

Exhibits filed as part of this annual report

 

  1.1  Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier PLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-167058) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2010)
  1.2  Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier NV (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.2 to the 2009 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
  1.3  Governing Agreement, (as amended on February 14, 2012) between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV
  1.4  RHBV Agreement, dated December 23, 1992 among Elsevier NV and Reed Holding B.V. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.4 to the 2002 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 10, 2003)
  2.1  Deposit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2003 among Reed Elsevier PLC, The Bank of New York and all holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference from Exhibit(a)(1) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-109805) filed by Reed Elsevier PLC with the SEC on October 17, 2003)
  2.2  Deposit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2003 among Reed Elsevier NV, The Bank of New York and all holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference from Exhibit(a)(1) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-109805) filed by Reed Elsevier NV with the SEC on October 17, 2003)
  4.1  Reed Elsevier Group plc Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4.2  

Reed Elsevier Group plc Long Term Incentive Share Option Scheme (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3

to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)

  4.3  Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4.4  Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan (2002) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4.5  Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive Share Option Schemes (No. 2) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4.6  Reed Elsevier Group plc Executive UK and Overseas Share Option Schemes (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.610.9 to the 2000 Form F-3 Registration Statement) (File No. 333-12926)
  4.7  Reed Elsevier Group plc Retention Share Plan (as amended on March 13, 2006) (incorporated by reference from exhibit 4.9 on the 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 22, 2007)
  4.8  Reed Elsevier US Salary Investment Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13666) filed with the SEC on October 2, 2000)
  4.9  Reed Elsevier Group plc Long Term Incentive Share Option Scheme (as restated for awards granted on or after April 19, 2006) (incorporated by reference from exhibit 4.11 to the 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 22, 2007)
  4.10  Reed Elsevier Group plc Bonus Investment Plan 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-167058) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2010)
  4.11  Reed Elsevier Group plc Growth Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-167058) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2010)
  4.12  Reed Elsevier Group plc LexisNexis Risk & Information Analytics Group Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-167058) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2010)
  4.13  Reed Elsevier Group plc Long Term Incentive Plan 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed (File No. 333-167058) with the SEC on May 25, 2010)
  4.14Service Agreement between Reed Elsevier Group plc and Erik Engstrom (dated March 14, 2011)
  4.15Service Agreement between Reed Elsevier Group plc and Duncan Palmer (dated August 15, 2012)
  4.16Letter between Reed Elsevier Group plc and Duncan Palmer (dated August 15, 2012)
  8.0  List of significant subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and business units
  12.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC
  12.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC

  12.3  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier NV

  12.4  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier NV
  13.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC
  13.2  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier PLC
  13.3  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Executive Officer of Reed Elsevier NV
  13.4  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Financial Officer of Reed Elsevier NV
  15.1  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent — Reed Elsevier Combined Financial Statements
  15.2  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent — Reed Elsevier PLC Consolidated Financial Statements
  15.3  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent — Reed Elsevier NV Consolidated Financial Statements

The total amount of long term debt securities of Reed Elsevier authorised under any single instrument does not exceed 10% of the combined total assets of Reed Elsevier. The Registrants hereby agree to furnish to the Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of holders of long term debt of Reed Elsevier or any of the combined businesses for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the Registrants certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorised, on March 12, 2012.2013.

 

REED ELSEVIER PLC

Registrant

  

REED ELSEVIER NV

Registrant

By: /s/ E ENGSTROM

 

E Engstrom

Chief Executive Officer

  

By: /s/ E ENGSTROM

 

E Engstrom

Chairman of the Executive Board &

Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ M H ARMOURD J PALMER

 

M H ArmourD J Palmer

Chief Financial Officer

  

By: /s/ M H ARMOURD J PALMER

 

M H ArmourD J Palmer

Member, Executive Board &

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 12, 20122013  Dated: March 12, 20122013

 

S-5