UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

 

¨

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

xX

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2011

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2014

OR

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

For the transition period fromto      

OR

 

¨

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number: 001-32846

 

CRH public limited company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Republic of Ireland

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation)

 

Belgard Castle, Clondalkin, Dublin 22, Ireland

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Maeve Carton

Tel: +353 1 404 1000

Fax: +353 1 404 1007

Belgard Castle, Clondalkin, Dublin 22, Ireland

(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

 

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

CRH plc

 
Ordinary Shares/Income Shares of0.34 eachThe New York Stock Exchange*
American Depositary Shares, each representing the right to receive one Ordinary ShareThe New York Stock Exchange
CRH America Inc.one Ordinary Share

CRH America Inc.

4.125% Notes due 2016 guaranteed by CRH plcThe New York Stock Exchange
6.000% Notes due 2016 guaranteed by CRH plcThe New York Stock Exchange
8.125% Notes due 2018 guaranteed by CRH plcThe New York Stock Exchange
5.750% Notes due 2021 guaranteed by CRH plcThe New York Stock Exchange

 

*

Not for trading but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

Ordinary Shares/Income Shares of0.34 each **

 727,897,906744,525,936  

5% Cumulative Preference Shares of1.27 each

 50,000  

7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares of1.27 each

 872,000  

 

**

Each Income Share is tied to an Ordinary Share and may only be transferred or otherwise dealt with in conjunction with such Ordinary Share.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YesxX No¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes¨ NoxX

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxX No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).*** Yes¨ No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x

XAccelerated filer  ¨Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP¨

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the
Other¨

International Accounting Standards BoardxX

Other  ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17¨ Item 18¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes¨ NoxX

 

***

This requirement does not yet apply to the registrant.

 


LOGO


 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CRH plc Annual Report

on Form 20-F

in respect of the year ended 31 December 2014

Table of Contents

Page

Cross Reference to Form 20-F Requirements

1

Chairman’s Introduction

2

A. Introduction

5

B. Strategy Review

33

C. Business Performance Review

65

Current Year Review

66

Prior Year Review

77

D. Governance

85

Board of Directors

87

Corporate Governance

90

Directors’ Remuneration Report

108

E. Consolidated Financial Statements

132

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

133

Consolidated Financial Statements

135

F. Shareholder Information

195

Listing of Exhibits

Signatures

Page
Cross Reference to Form 20-F Requirements1
Introduction and Performance Indicators3
A.Description of the Group8
B.Business Review37
(i)Current Year Review38
(ii)Prior Year Review54
C.Directors and Corporate Governance66
(i)Board of Directors67
(ii)Corporate Governance Report71
(iii)Directors’ Remuneration85
D.Consolidated Financial Statements97
(i)

Auditors’ Report

98
(ii)Consolidated Financial Statements100
E.Shareholder Information179
Listing of Exhibits196
Signatures197 

LOGO


LOGO


Cross Reference to Form 20-F Requirements

This table has been provided as a cross reference from the information included in this Annual Report to the requirements of thethis 20-F.

 

   PagePAGE

Introduction and Performance Measures

6

 
Introduction and Performance Indicators3

PartPART I

   

Item 1.

 Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors   n/a  

Item 2.

 Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable   n/a  

Item 3.

 Key Information  

 A - Selected financial data   5, 1828, 198

 
 B - Capitalisation and indebtedness   n/a

 
 C - Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds   n/a  
 

D - Risk factors   3152

 

Item 4.

 Information on the Company  
 

A - History and development of the companyCompany   911  
 B - Business overview6, 17

 
 CB - Organisational structureBusiness overview   9, 11, 15  
 

C - Organisational structure11

D - Property, plants and equipment   2629

 

Item 4A.

 Unresolved Staff Comments   None  

Item 5.

 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

A - Operating results31, 34, 66

B - Liquidity and capital resources67

C - Research and development, patent and licenses, etc.32

D - Trend information66

E - Off-balance sheet arrangements69

F - Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations69

G - Safe Harbor9

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

A - Directors and senior management87

B - Compensation108

C - Board practices90

D - Employees32

E - Share ownership121, 197

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  
 A - Operating results29, 38

 
 BA - Liquidity and capital resourcesMajor shareholders   42197  
 C - Research and development, patent and licenses, etc.30

 
 DB - Trend informationRelated party transactions   39185  
 E - Off-balance sheet arrangements44
F - Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations44
G - Safe Harbor3

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A - Directors and senior management68
B - Compensation85
C - Board practices71
D - Employees16
E - Share ownership90, 183

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A - Major shareholders181
B - Related party transactions170 
 C - Interests of experts and counsel   n/a  

Item 8.

 Financial Information  
 

A - Consolidated statements and other financial information   97, 182132, 198  
     - Legal proceedings30

 
 - DividendsLegal proceedings   18232  
 B

- Significant changesDividends   44198

B - Significant changes68

 

Item 9.

 The Offer and Listing  
 

A - Offer and listing details   180196

 
 B - Plan of distribution   n/a  
 C - Markets

   180Page

C - Markets196

 
 D - Selling shareholders   n/a  
 

E - Dilution   n/a

 
 F - Expenses of the issue   n/a  

Item 10.

 Additional Information  

 A - Share capital   n/a  
 

B - Memorandum and articles of association   190204  
 C - Material contractsNone

 
 DC - Exchange controlsMaterial contracts   19544  
 E

D - TaxationExchange controls   188207  

CRH    1


E - Taxation   202PAGE

 
 F - Dividends and paying agents   n/a  
 

G - Statements by experts   n/a  
 

H - Documents on display   195207

 
 I - Subsidiary information   n/a  

Item 11.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   4468

 

Item 12.

 Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities  
 

A - Debt Securitiessecurities   n/a  
 

B - Warrants and Rightsrights   n/a  
 

C - Other Securitiessecurities   n/a  
 

D - American Depositary Sharesdepositary shares   186200  

Part

PART II

   

Item 13.

 Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies   None  

Item 14.

 Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds   None  

Item 15.

 Controls and Procedures   83106

 

Item 16A.

 Audit Committee Financial Expert   7697

 

Item 16B.

 Item 16B. Code of Ethics   81106

 

Item 16C.

 Principal Accountant Fees and Services   195207

 

Item 16D.

 Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees   n/a  

Item 16E.

 Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer &and Affiliated Purchasers   182198

 

Item 16F.

 Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant   None  

Item 16G.

 Corporate Governance   8390

 

Item 16H.

 Mine Safety Disclosures   3029  

Part

PART III

   

Item 17.

 Financial Statements   n/a  

Item 18.

 Financial Statements   97132

 

Item 19.

 Exhibits   196208

 

LOGO

CRH      1


LOGO

Chairman’s Introduction

Dear Shareholder,

In the Chief Executive’s introduction to last year’s Annual Report, Albert Manifold set out the areas of focus for management in 2014. He highlighted dynamic portfolio management together with maintaining CRH’s traditional tight cost control, capital discipline and focus on returns as being key to driving growth and to rebuilding margins in the coming years.

A significant amount of progress has been made in the past 12 months, which is reflected in the results and performance for 2014. In particular, we are pleased with progress in the multi-year divestment programme and the related reshaping of the Group’s portfolio.

The Group’s financial strength was further enhanced during the year by two bond issuances, co-ordinated by Maeve Carton, our Finance Director, and her team, in the amounts of €600 million and CHF330 million. The record low coupons achieved by the Group for these bonds reflect our track record in debt markets and the value that results from our investment grade credit ratings.

In respect of 2014, the Board is recommending a final dividend of 44c per share. If approved at the 2015 Annual General Meeting, this will maintain the full-year dividend at 62.5c per share.

During the last year, my non-executive colleagues and I have spent a considerable amount of time working with the executive Directors and the wider management team on reviewing and refining the Group’s strategy in the context of the evolution of key markets and products over time and in setting the priorities for the Group. On 1 February 2015 we announced that CRH had entered into a binding commitment to acquire certain assets from Lafarge S.A. (“Lafarge”) and Holcim Ltd (“Holcim”) for a total enterprise value of €6.5 billion, subject to: (i) CRH shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held on 19 March 2015; (ii) the successful completion of the

 

2        CRH


LOGO

proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim; and (iii) the completion of certain local reorganisations by Lafarge and Holcim in advance of the acquisition. The Board believes that this acquisition, which arises from regulatory requirements for industry deconsolidation in connection with the merger of Lafarge and Holcim, represents a compelling strategic opportunity for the Group, and that our financial, capital and operational discipline has positioned the Group to take advantage of this unique opportunity at this time. The placing of approximately 74 million shares in CRH plc, which completed on 5 February 2015, raised €1.6 billion as part of the financing of this acquisition. Further details are set out on page 44 and in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2015, in addition to the integration plan for the Lafarge/Holcim assets, on the approval of shareholders, the Board will continue to focus on talent management, cyber security, and working towards the achievement of sustainability, safety and environmental priorities. In relation to safety, 2015 will see the introduction of a new Chairman’s award for safety excellence in the Group.

During 2014, the Board redoubled its ongoing focus on the area of compliance and ethics to ensure that CRH’s processes are robust and in line with best practice across the Group. In the current training cycle a further 32,000 employees participated in Code of Business Conduct training. A further 11,000 also undertook advanced instruction on changing regulatory environments, anti-bribery rules, competition law and other relevant areas such as corruption and fraud. We remain vigilant in our business practices in this area and are responsive to all regulatory agencies.

Notwithstanding this work, as we announced in May 2014 the Swiss Competition Commission has an open investigation in respect of practices in the sanitary building products sector in Switzerland and its Secretariat has recommended that the industry, of which certain CRH group companies are members, be fined. Engagement with the Swiss Competition Commission is ongoing and CRH is responding vigorously to the allegations made by the Secretariat. In doing so, we maintain our initial assessment that the case is ill-founded and that the proposed fine in respect of the Group is unjustified.

Two new non-executive Directors joined the Board in recent months. Pat Kennedy was appointed in January 2015 while Lucinda Riches has been appointed with effect from 1 March 2015. Their biographies, along with those of the rest of the Board are set out on pages 87 to 89. Further details on the ongoing process of Board renewal are set out in theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee Report on page 93.

All Directors will retire at the Annual General Meeting on Thursday, 7 May 2015, with those eligible offering themselves for re-election. I strongly recommend that shareholders vote in favour of each of the individuals putting themselves forward for re-election.

As part of the Board’s planned renewal process, John Kennedy and Dan O’Connor will step down from the Board at the conclusion of the 2015 Annual General Meeting on 7 May 2015. On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank John and Dan for their commitment and great service to CRH over many years.

Finally, I would like to take the opportunity to thank Albert and his team for their significant achievements over the past year.

Nicky Hartery,Chairman

LOGO

CRH      3


LOGO

4        CRH


Introduction

Page

Introduction and Performance Measures6

History, Development and Organisational
Structure of the Company
11

Business Overview11

Operational Snapshot12

Operational Reviews14

Mineral Reserves28

Property, Plants and Equipment29

Development Review30

The Environment and Government Regulations31

LOGO

CRH      5


LOGO

Introduction and Performance IndicatorsMeasures

 

 

  Reconciliation of EBITDA (as defined)* and Operating Profit (by segment) to Group Profit

 

 
   

 

Continuing operations - year ended 31 December

 

 
   

 

Group operating profit before

depreciation and amortisation

(EBITDA (as defined)*)

 

   

Depreciation, amortisation

and impairment

 

   

Group operating profit1

 

 
   2014
€m
   2013
m
   2012
m
   2014
€m
   2013
m
   2012
m
   2014
€m
  2013
m
  2012
m
 

  Europe Heavyside

   380     326     426     229     721     239     151    (395  187  

  Europe Lightside

   94     71     78     23     43     29     71    28    49  
  Europe Distribution   190     186     217     78     80     72     112    106    145  
  Europe   664     583     721     330     844     340     334    (261  381  

  Americas Materials

   609     557     555     254     331     276     355    226    279  

  Americas Products

   263     246     204     118     178     118     145    68    86  
  Americas Distribution   105     89     83     22     22     24     83    67    59  
  Americas   977     892     842     394     531     418     583    361    424  
  Total Group   1,641     1,475     1,563     724     1,375     758     917    100    805  

  Profit on disposals

                                 77    26    230  

  Finance costs less income

                                 (246  (249  (256

  Other financial expense

                                 (42  (48  (49

  Share of equity accounted investments’ profit/(loss)

  

       55    (44  (84

  Profit/(loss) before tax

                                 761    (215  646  
  Income tax expense                                 (177  (80  (106
  Group profit/(loss) for the financial year               584    (295  540  

  1 Throughout this document, Group operating profit as shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements excludes profit on disposals.

 

  

 

  Calculation of EBITDA (as defined)* Net Interest Cover

 

 
   2014
€m
  2013
m
  2012
m
 

  Interest

             

  Finance costs1

   254    262    271  
  Finance income1   (8  (13  (15
  Net interest   246    249    256  

  EBITDA (as defined)*

   1,641      1,475      1,563  
    Times  

  EBITDA (as defined)* net interest cover (EBITDA (as defined)* divided by net interest)

   6.7    5.9    6.1  

  1 These items appear on the Consolidated Income Statement on page 135.

 

  

*

Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

6      CRH


 

Forward-Looking Statements

In order to utilise the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, CRH public limited company (the “Company”), and its subsidiaries (collectively, “CRH” or the “Group”) is providing the following cautionary statement.

This document contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of CRH and certain of the plans and objectives of CRH with respect to these items (including the statements under “2012 Outlook” on page 40 and under “Outlook” in each of the segment review sections). These statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as “anticipates”, “should”, “expects”, “estimates”, “believes”, “intends” or similar expressions. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they reflect the Company’s current expectations and assumptions as to future events and circumstances that may not prove accurate. A number of material factors could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond our control, and which include, among other things, those factors identified in the Risk Factors section.

CRH Website

Information on or accessible through our website,www.crh.com,, other than the item identified as the Annual Report onForm 20-F, does not form part of and is not incorporated into this document. References in this document to other documents on the CRH website such as the Circular to shareholders in respect of the proposed Acquisition, are included only as an aid to their location. The Group’s website provides the full text of the Annual and Interim Reports, the Annual Report on Form 20-F, which is filed annually with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, trading statements, interim management statements, and copies of presentations to analysts and investors.investors and circulars to shareholders. News releases are made available, in the News & Events section of the website, immediately after release to the Stock Exchanges.

Key Information

The Consolidated Financial Statements of CRH plc have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issuedadopted by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Selected financial data has been presented for the five years ended on 31 December 20112014 on pages 5 and 6.page 8. For the three years ended 31 December 2011,2014, the selected financial data areis qualified in theirits entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the related Notes and the Business Performance Review section included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (“Annual Report” or “Form 20-F”).

Non-GAAP Performance IndicatorsMeasures

CRH uses a number of non-GAAP performance indicatorsmeasures to monitor financial performance. These are summarised below and discussed later in this report.

Net Debt.Netdebt Net debt is used by management as it gives a more complete picture of the Group’s current debt situation than total interest-bearing loans and borrowings. Net debt is provided to enable investors to see the economic effect of gross debt, related hedges and cash and cash equivalents in total. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure and comprises current and non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents liquid investments and current and non-current derivative financial instruments. A reconciliation of total interest-bearing loans and borrowings to net debt is set out in note 2520 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

EBITDA (as defined).EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax and is quoted by management to aid investors in their analysis of the performance of the Group and to assist investors in the comparison of the Group’s performance with that of other companies. EBITDA (as defined) and operating profit results by segment are monitored by management in order to allocate resources between segments and to assess performance. Given that net finance costs and income tax are managed on a centralised basis, these items are not allocated between operating segments for

the purpose of the information presented to the Chief Operating Decision-Maker.

CRH    3


Introduction and Performance Indicators

Reconciliation of EBITDA (as defined)* and Operating Profit (by segment) to Group Profit

   Continuing operations - year ended 31 December 
   Materials   Products   Distribution   Total Group 
    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
  2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 

Group operating profit before depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA (as defined)*)

  

Europe

   436     423     434     194     198    283     267     214     204     897    835    921  

Americas

   530     566     670     164     154    173     65     60     39     759    780    882  
    966     989     1,104     358     352    456     332     274     243     1,656    1,615    1,803  

Depreciation and amortisation (including asset impairment charges)

  

Europe

   172     172     177     128     187    167     77     79     67     377    438    411  

Americas

   266     278     263     122     178    150     20     23     24     408    479    437  
    438     450     440     250     365    317     97     102     91     785    917    848  

Group operating profit

  

             

Europe

   264     251     257     66     11    116     190     135     137     520    397    510  

Americas

   264     288     407     42     (24  23     45     37     15     351    301    445  
    528     539     664     108     (13  139     235     172     152     871    698    955  

Profit on disposals

  

   55    55    26  

Finance costs (net)

  

   (257  (247  (297

Group share of associates’ profit after tax

  

   42    28    48  

Profit before tax

  

   711    534    732  

Income tax expense

  

   (114  (95  (134

Group profit for the financial year

  

   597    439    598  

Throughout this document, Group operating profit as shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements excludes profit on disposals.

Net Interest Ratio.Cover.Net Interest Ratio EBITDA net interest cover is used by management as a measure matchingwhich matches the earnings and cash generated by the business to the underlying funding costs. Net Interest RatioEBITDA (as defined)* net interest cover is presented to provide a greater understanding of the impact of CRH’s debt and financing arrangements and, as discussed in note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, is a metric used in lender covenants. It is the ratio of EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest and is calculated as follows:

Calculation of EBITDA (as defined)* to Net Interest Ratio

    2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 

Net Interest

    

Finance costs1

   262    255    305  

Finance income1

   (33  (37  (35

Other financial expense1

   28    29    27  

Net interest expense

   257    247    297  

EBITDA (as defined)*

   1,656    1,615    1,803  
    times 

EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio (EBITDA (as defined)* divided by net interest expense)

   6.4    6.5    6.1  

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.
1These items appear on the Consolidated Income Statement on page 100.

4    CRH


Introduction and Performance Indicators

on page 6.

The definitions and calculations used in lender covenant agreements include certain specified adjustments to the amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The ratios as calculated on the basis of the definitions in those covenants are disclosed in note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Organic Revenue, Organic Operating Profit. CRH pursues a strategy of growth through acquisitions and investments, with610 €188 million spent on acquisitions and investments in 2011 (2010:5672014 (2013: €720 million); these acquisitions. Acquisitions completed in 2013 and 2014 contributed to the change inincremental sales revenue of €237 million and operating profit of €4 million in 2011, adding incremental revenue of805 million2014. Proceeds from divestments and incremental operating profit of49 million compared with 2010. Proceeds (including net debt assumed by the purchasers) from disposal of non-current assets and businessesasset disposals amounted to492 €345 million (2010:188(2013: €283 million). The sales impact of divested activities in 20112014 was a negative469 €25 million and because these operations generated net losses in 2010,2013, the disposal impact at operating profit level was a contribution of16m €1 million compared with 2010. Exchange translation movements had ato 2013.

During 2014, the US Dollar remained relatively minor impact on 2011 results with a strengtheningstable at approximately 1.33 against the euro, however the weakening of currencies like the Swiss FrancUkrainian Hryvnia and Canadian Dollar, partly offset by a weakeningthe strengthening of Sterling, were the US Dollar and Polish Zloty averageprincipal factors behind the exchange rates.effects disclosed on page 67. Because of the impact of acquisitions, divestments, exchange translation and other non-recurring items on reported results each year, the Group uses organic revenue and organic operating profit as additional performance indicators to assess performance of pre-existing (also referred to as underlying, heritage, like-for-like or ongoing) operations each year.

Organic revenue and organic operating profit is arrived at by excluding the incremental revenue and operating profit contributions from current and prior year acquisitions and divestments, the impact of exchange translation and the impact of any non-recurring items. In the Business Performance Review section which follows, changes in organic revenue and organic operating profit are presented as additional measures of revenue and operating profit to provide a greater understanding of the performance of the Group. A reconciliation of the changes in organic revenue and organic operating profit to the changes in total revenue and operating profit for the Group and by segment is presented with the discussion of each segment’s performance in tables contained in the segment discussion commencing on page 45.70.

Selected Financial Data

Consolidated Income Statement Data

Year ended 31 December

 

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2008
m
   2007
m
 
(Amounts in millions, except per share data and ratios) 

Revenue

   18,081     17,173     17,373     20,887     20,992  

Group operating profit

   871     698     955     1,841     2,086  

Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company

   590     432     592     1,248     1,430  

Basic earnings per Ordinary Share1

   82.6c     61.3c     88.3c     210.2c     236.9c  

Diluted earnings per Ordinary Share1

   82.6c     61.2c     87.9c     209.0c     234.8c  

Dividends paid during calendar year per Ordinary Share1

   62.5c     62.5c     62.2c     61.8c     52.8c  
Average number of Ordinary Shares outstanding (millions of shares)1   714.4     704.6     670.8     593.9     603.6  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (times)2

   2.4     2.1     2.4     3.9     5.0  
*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

All data relates to continuing operations

LOGO

 

CRH      7


LOGO

Introduction and Performance Measures |continued

 

 Selected Financial Data

 

                   

 

  Year ended 31 December (amounts in millions, except per share data and ratios)

 

     
   2014       20131      20122       20112       20102 
   €m   m  m   m   m 

  Consolidated Income Statement Data

                        

  Revenue

   18,912     18,031    18,084     18,081     17,173  

  Group operating profit

   917     100    805     871     698  

  Profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company

   582     (296  538     580     432  

  Basic earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share

   78.9c     (40.6c  74.6c     81.2c     61.3c  

  Diluted earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share

   78.8c     (40.6c  74.5c     81.2c     61.2c  

  Dividends paid during calendar year per Ordinary Share

   62.5c     62.5c    62.5c     62.5c     62.5c  

  Average number of Ordinary Shares outstanding3

   737.6     729.2    721.9     714.4     704.6  

  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (times)4

   2.6     0.75    2.6     2.4     2.1  

  All data relates to continuing operations

         

  Consolidated Balance Sheet Data

                        

  Total assets

   22,017     20,429    20,900     21,384     21,461  

  Net assets6

   10,198     9,686    10,589     10,593     10,411  

  Ordinary shareholders’ equity

   10,176     9,661    10,552     10,518     10,327  

  Equity share capital

   253     251    249     247     244  

  Number of Ordinary Shares3

   744.5     739.2    733.8     727.9     718.5  

  Number of Treasury Shares and own shares3

   3.8     6.0    7.4     8.9     9.5  

  Number of Ordinary Shares net of Treasury Shares and own shares3

   740.7     733.2    726.4     719.0     709.0  

1

Average number      Group operating profit includes asset impairment charges of Ordinary Shares, earnings per share, number€650 million in 2013, with an additional €105 million impairment charge included in loss attributable to equity holders of Ordinary Shares at 31 Decemberthe company in respect of equity accounted investments. Details are contained in note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2      On 1 January 2013, the Group adopted IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and dividend amounts for 2007IAS 19 Employee Benefits (revised). As a result, the prior year comparatives were restated as required by IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and 2008 have beenErrors. The 2010 data was not adjusted retrospectively for the bonus elementadoption of IAS 19 Employee Benefits (revised) due to the March 2009 Rights Issue by applying a factor of 1.1090.practical difficulties associated with obtaining such information.

 

23      Shown in millions of shares.

4      For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, in accordance with Item 503 of Regulation S-K, earnings have been calculated by adding: profitprofit/(loss) before tax adjusted to exclude the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax, fixed charges and dividends received from associates;equity accounted investments; and the fixed charges were calculated by adding interest expensed and capitalised, amortised premiums, discounts and capitalised expenses related to indebtedness, an estimate of the interest within rental expense and preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries.

CRH    5


Introduction and Performance Indicators

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2008
m
   2007
m
 
(Amounts in millions)    

Total assets

   21,387     21,461     20,283     21,121     19,788  

Net assets1

   10,583     10,411     9,710     8,157     8,020  

Ordinary shareholders’ equity

   10,508     10,327     9,636     8,086     7,953  

Equity share capital

   247     244     241     186     186  
Number of Ordinary Shares2*   727.9     718.5     710.5     608.3     606.9  
Number of Treasury Shares and ownshares*   8.9     9.5     12.8     17.1     0.9  
Number of Ordinary Shares net of Treasury Shares and own shares2*   719.0     709.0     697.7     591.2     606.0  

 

15      The amount of the deficiency in 2013 was US$183 million.

6      Net assets is calculated as the sum of total assets less total liabilities.

 

2The number of Ordinary Shares for 2007 and 2008 has been adjusted for the bonus element of the March 2009 Rights Issue by applying a factor of 1.1090.
8      CRH


 

*Shown in millions of shares.

Forward-Looking Statements

In order to utilise the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, CRH public limited company (the “Company”), and its subsidiaries (collectively, “CRH” or the “Group”) is providing the following cautionary statement.

This document contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of CRH and certain of the plans and objectives of CRH including the statements under: “Strategy Review – Chief Executive’s Introduction – Outlook for 2015”; in the “Business Performance Review – Finance Director’s Introduction” with respect to our belief that the Group has sufficient resources to meet its debt obligations and capital and other expenditure requirements in 2015; in the “Business Performance Review” section with respect to our expectations regarding economic activity and fiscal developments in our operating regions; our expectations for the residential, non-residential and infrastructure markets, our expectation for operating profits and/or margins in 2015 under the heading ‘Outlook’ in each of the six operating segment reviews; under the heading “Strategy Review - Proposed Acquisition - Announced February 2015” with respect to the expected benefits and reasons for the proposed Acquisition, the timing of regulatory approvals and other conditions and the timing for completion of the proposed Acquisition; under the heading “China and India – Equity Accounted Investments – Outlook” with respect to future market conditions in China and India; and under the heading “Risk Factors – Financial instruments” with respect to the expected PBITDA/net interest cover as a result of the proposed Acquisition. These forward-looking statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as “will”, “anticipates”, “should”, “expects”, “is expected to”, “estimates”, “believes”, “intends” or similar expressions.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future and reflect the Company’s current expectations and assumptions as to such future events and circumstances that may not prove accurate. A number of material factors could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied

by these forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond our control and which include, among other things: economic and financial conditions generally in various countries and regions where we operate; the pace of recovery in the overall construction and building materials sector; demand for infrastructure, residential and non-residential construction in our geographic markets; increased competition and its impact on prices; increases in energy and/or raw materials costs; adverse changes to laws and regulations; adverse political developments in various countries and regions; failure to complete or successfully integrate acquisitions; and the specific factors identified in the discussions accompanying such forward-looking statements and under “Risk Factors” in this document.

Statements Regarding Competitive Position and Construction Activity

Statements made in the Description of the Group and in the Business Performance Review sections referring to the Group’s competitive position are based on the Group’s belief, and in some cases rely on a range of sources, including investment analysts’ reports, independent market studies and the Group’s internal assessment of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants.

Unless otherwise specified, references to construction activity or other market activity relate to the relevant market as a whole and are based on publicly available information from a range of sources, including independent market studies, construction industry data and economic forecasts for individual jurisdictions.

Seasonality

Activity in the construction industry is characterised by cyclicality and is dependent to a considerable extent on the seasonal impact of weather in the Group’s operating locations, with activity in some markets reduced significantly in winter due to inclement weather. First-half sales accounted for 44% of full-year 2014 (2013: 44%), while EBITDA (as defined)* for the first six months of 2014 represented 31% of the full-year out-turn (2013: 27%).

*

Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      9


LOGO

Introduction and Performance Measures |continued

Exchange Rates

In this Form 20-F, references to “US$”, “US Dollars” or “US cents” are to the United States currency, references to “euro”, “euro cent”, “cent”, “c” or “€” are to the euro currency and “Stg£“Stg£” or “Sterling” are to the currency of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom” or “UK”). Other currencies referred to in this Form 20-F include Polish Zloty (“PLN”), Swiss Franc (“CHF”), Canadian Dollar (“CAD”), Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”), Argentine Peso (“ARP”), Turkish Lira (“TRY”), Indian Rupee (“INR”), Ukrainian Hryvnia (“UAH”) and Israeli Shekel (“ILS”).

Merely forFor the convenience of the reader, this Form 20-F contains translations of certain euro amounts into US Dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be construed as representations that the euro amounts actually represent such US Dollar amounts or could be converted into US Dollars at the rate indicated. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York Noon Buying Rate (the “FRB Noon Buying Rate”) on 31 December 20112014 was1 €1 = US$1.29731.2101 and on 236 March 20122015 was1 €1 = US$1.3263.1.0855.

6    CRH


Introduction and Performance Indicators

The following table below sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, the average, high, low and end-of-period exchange rates in US Dollars per1 €1 (to the nearest cent) using the FRB Noon Buying Rate. These rates may vary slightly from the rates used for translating foreign currencies into euro in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements (see page 145).

For a discussion on the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on the financial condition and results of the operations of the Group, see the Business Performance Review section beginning on page 66.

 

Years ended 31 December  Period End   Average Rate1   High   Low 

2007

   1.46     1.38     1.49     1.29  

2008

   1.39     1.47     1.60     1.24  

2009

   1.43     1.40     1.51     1.25  

2010

   1.33     1.32     1.45     1.20  

2011

   1.30     1.40     1.49     1.29  

2012 (through 23 March 2012)

   1.33     1.31     1.35     1.27  
Months ended                    

September 2011

   1.34     1.37     1.43     1.34  

October 2011

   1.39     1.37     1.42     1.33  

November 2011

   1.35     1.36     1.38     1.32  

December 2011

   1.30     1.32     1.35     1.29  

January 2012

   1.31     1.29     1.32     1.27  

February 2012

   1.34     1.32     1.35     1.31  

March 2012 (through 23 March 2012)

   1.33     1.32     1.33     1.30  

                                                                                

 

 Exchange Rates

 

                

  Years ended 31 December

 

  

Period End

 

   

Average Rate1

 

   

High

 

   

Low

 

 

  2010

   1.33     1.32     1.45     1.20  

  2011

   1.30     1.40     1.49     1.29  

  2012

   1.32     1.29     1.35     1.21  

  2013

   1.38     1.33     1.38     1.28  

  2014

   1.21     1.32     1.39     1.21  

  2015 (through 6 March 2015)

   1.09     1.11     1.20     1.09  
        
  Months ended

 

                

  September 2014

   1.26     1.29     1.31     1.26  

  October 2014

   1.25     1.27     1.28     1.25  

  November 2014

   1.24     1.25     1.26     1.24  

  December 2014

   1.21     1.23     1.25     1.21  

  January 2015

   1.13     1.16     1.20     1.13  

  February 2015

   1.12     1.14     1.15     1.12  

  March 2015 (through 6 March 2015)

   1.09     1.11     1.12     1.09  

1

The average of the US Dollar/euro exchange rate on the last day of each month during the period or in the case of monthly averages, the average of all days in the month, in each case using the FRB Noon Buying Rate.

The above rates may vary slightly from the rates used for translating foreign currencies into euro in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements (see page 117).

For a discussion on the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on the financial condition and results of the operations of the Group, see the Business Review section beginning on page 38.

CRH    7


DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

 

 

History, Development and Organisational Structure of the Company

10      CRH
  9

Group Strategy

10

End-use, Locations and Volumes

11

Executive Management Team

14

Business Overview

17

Development and Portfolio Review

25

Property, Plants and Equipment

26

The Environment and Government Regulations

29

Risk Factors

31

8    CRH


DescriptionHistory, Development andOrganisational Structure of the GroupCompany

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

 

 

 

History, Development and Organisational Structure of the Company

CRH public limited company is the parent company for anof a diversified international group of companies engaged in the manufacture and supply of a wide range ofwhich provide building materials across the spectrum of the construction industry – from building foundations to frame and inroofing, to fitting out the operation of builders’ merchantinginterior space and “Do-It-Yourself” (“DIY”) stores.improving the exterior environment, onsite works and infrastructural projects, our materials and products are used extensively.

The Group resulted from the merger in 1970 of two leading Irish public companies, Cement Limited (established in 1936) and Roadstone, Limited (incorporated in 1949). Cement Limited manufactured and supplied cement while Roadstone, Limited was primarily involved in the manufacture and supply of aggregates, readymixed concrete, mortar, coated macadam, asphalt and contract surfacing to the Irish construction industry.

The Company is incorporated and domiciled in the Republic of Ireland. CRH is a public limited company operating under the Companies Acts of Ireland, 1963 to 20092013 and the Investment Funds, Companies and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 2006, each as amended. The Group’s worldwide headquarters are located in Dublin, Ireland. ItsOur principal executive offices are located at Belgard Castle, Clondalkin, Dublin 22 (telephone: +353 1 404 1000). The Company’s registered office is located at 42 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland and itsour US agent is Oldcastle, Inc., 375 Northridge Road,900 Ashwood Parkway, Suite 600, Atlanta, Georgia 30350.30338. The Company is the holding company of the Group, with direct and indirect share and loan interests in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. From Group headquarters, a small team of executives exercisesexercise strategic control over itsour decentralised operations.

CRH, which has a premium listing on The London Stock Exchange Limited (“London Stock Exchange”), is also one of the largest companies, based on market capitalisation, quoted on The Irish

Stock Exchange Limited (“Irish Stock Exchange”) in Dublin. CRH is also quoted on The London Stock Exchange Limited (“London Stock Exchange”) in the United Kingdom and its

CRH’s American Depositary Sharesshares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in the United States. The market capitalisation of CRH as of 31 December 20112014 was11 €14.7 billion.

In December 2011, changes in the Group’s listing arrangements facilitated the inclusionCRH is a constituent member of CRH in the FTSE 100 index and FTSE All-Share indices, a move which we believe will increase the Group’s attractiveness to a wider international investor base. CRH continues to be included in the MSCI Euro indices, the EuroStoxx indices and in the ISEQ 20 and ISEQ Overall indices, among others.20.

For reporting purposes,As outlined in note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in conjunction with the ongoing portfolio review, the Group reorganised its European business in 2014 and is organised into six business segments comprising Europe Materials (including activities in Chinawhich form the operational organisational structure and India), Americas Materials (in the United States), Europe Products (including activities in Australia), Americas Products (in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Chile and Argentina), Europe Distribution and Americas Distribution (in the United States). The activities of the various segments are briefly described below as follows:

Materialsbusinesses are predominantly engagedoutlined further in the production and sale of a range of primary materials including cement, aggregates, readymixed concrete, asphalt/bitumen and agricultural and/or chemical lime.

Productsbusinesses are predominantly engaged in the production and sale of architectural and structural concrete products, clay products, fabricated and tempered glass products, construction accessories and the provision of a wide range of inter-related products and services to the construction sector.

Distribution businesses encompass builders merchanting activities and Do-It-Yourself (DIY) stores engaged in the marketing and sale of supplies to the construction sector and to the general public.sections that follow.

In the detailed description of the Group’s business that follows, estimates of the Group’s various aggregateaggregates and stone reserves have been provided by engineers employed by the individual operating companies. Details of product end-use by sector for each reporting segment are based on management estimates.

As a result of planned geographic diversification since the mid-1970s, and most particularly in the period 2001 to 2008, the Group has expanded by acquisition and organic growth into an international manufacturer and supplier of building materials. CRH now has operations in 36 countries, mainly in

CRH    9


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Western Europe and North America as well as, tois a lesser degree, in developing economies in Eastern Europe, South America, the Mediterranean basin, China, India and Australia,leading global building materials group employing approximately 76,000 people at closeover 3,300 locations worldwide. For over four decades, CRH has developed and implemented a proven model of business improvement. By building better businesses across our international operations, we have grown to 3,600 locations.be a leader in the global building materials industry. We operate in 34 countries and we are the largest building materials company in North America, a regional leader in Europe, and have strategic positions in Asia.

The principal subsidiary joint ventureundertakings and associated undertakingsequity accounted investments are listed in Exhibit 8. The operational organisational structure is detailed above.

Group Strategy

CRH strategy is8 to sustain and grow a geographically diversified business with exposure to all segments of construction demand, enabling CRH to achieve its vision of being a responsible international leader in building materials delivering superior performance and growth.

CRH’s Business Model

CRH strives to outperform in its business operations, develop its people and build regional market leadership positions across an actively managed portfolio, while a federal structure effectively combines large company resources and local company entrepreneurship. The portfolio is well balanced across geographies, sector end-uses, and both new and RMI (repair, maintenance and improvement) construction, thus providing exposure to multiple demand drivers which help smooth the effects of varying economic cycles.

With a rigorous approach to capital allocation and a strong focusthis Annual Report on cash generation, CRH reinvests in its existing assets and acquires well-run, value-creating businesses while seeking exposure to new development opportunities and creating platforms for future growth. In a fragmented industry, CRH typically acquires small to mid-sized companies which complement the existing network; however this is augmented from time to time with larger transactions where we see compelling value. This sustainable business model and overall strategic approach has enabled CRH to deliver superior long-term performance through the business cycle.Form 20-F.

Developed Economies

In the developed world, CRH’s strategic focus is to continue to reinvest in its established platforms for operational efficiency, product quality and customer service. The development of these businesses is primarily through bolt-on acquisitions which enhance vertical integration, bolster our strong long-term permitted reserves positions and fill out regional and product level positions. In Western Europe and North America CRH has built a balanced portfolio of businesses which service the breadth of building materials demand from the fundamentals of heavy materials and elements to construct the frame, through value-added exterior products that complete the building envelope, to distribution channels which service construction fit-out and renewal. In many of its regions, CRH’s diverse business base is uniquely positioned to provide a broad product offering to the construction industry. While our heavyside building materials operations support the Group’s exposure to new-build construction, the lightside of our product range enables CRH to participate in the growing RMI markets of mature economies.

Developing Economies

In emerging regions, CRH’s strategy is to target premium assets as an initial footprint, usually in cement and often in partnership with strong local established businesses. We identify entry platforms that have well-located quality operations and good regional market positions and which have the potential to develop further downstream into integrated building materials businesses as construction markets become more sophisticated over time. In the mid-1990s, CRH applied this approach to its entry into the Polish market and today the Group is the leading integrated building materials company in Poland. CRH is now replicating this approach in its platforms in Ukraine, India and China. As these markets develop, more sophisticated construction methods will emerge and, as has been our experience in Eastern Europe, a wide range of value-added construction products will be required, enabling CRH to roll out a broader range of products over time across the industry.

10    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

 

 

Sector exposure and end-use (EBITDA (as defined)*)

LOGO

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Excludes CRH share of cement (c. 8.9m tonnes) and readymixed concrete (c. 0.7m cubic metres) attributable to associates, Uniland in Spain (26%), Mashav in Israel (25%) and Yatai Building Materials in China (26%).

1Throughout this document annualised volumes have been used which may vary from actual volumes produced and reflect the full-year impact of acquisitions made during the year.

2Throughout this document tonnes denotes metric tonnes (i.e. 1,000 kilogrammes).

CRH    11


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

LOGO

12    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

LOGO

CRH    13


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

CRH Executive Management Team

Maeve Carton was appointed Finance Director and became a CRH Board Director in May 2010. Since joining CRH in 1988, she has held a number of roles in the Group Finance area and was appointed Group Controller in 2001 and Head of Group Finance in January 2009. She has broad-ranging experience of CRH’s reporting, control, budgetary and capital expenditure processes and has been extensively involved in CRH’s evaluation of acquisitions. Prior to joining CRH, she worked for a number of years as a chartered accountant in an international accountancy practice.

Myles Leewas appointed a CRH Board Director in November 2003. He joined CRH in 1982. Prior to this he worked in a professional accountancy practice and in the oil industry. He was appointed General Manager Finance in 1988 and to the position of Finance Director in November 2003. A civil engineer and chartered accountant, he has 30 years’ experience of the building materials industry and of CRH’s international expansion. He was appointed Group Chief Executive with effect from January 2009.

Albert Manifoldwas appointed Chief Operating Officer of CRH and to the CRH Board with effect from January 2009. He joined CRH in 1998. Prior to joining CRH he was Chief Operating Officer with a private equity group. He has held a variety of senior positions, including Finance Director of the Europe Materials Division and Group Development Director of CRH. Prior to his current appointment, he was Managing Director, Europe Materials.

This page left to right:

Maeve Carton, Finance Director

Myles Lee,Chief Executive

Opposite page left to right:

Standing: Doug Black,

President and Chief Operating Officer Oldcastle, Inc.

Erik Bax,Managing Director Europe Products & Distribution

Seated: Albert Manifold,Chief Operating Officer

Henry Morris,Managing Director Europe Materials

Mark Towe,Chief Executive Officer Oldcastle, Inc.

LOGO

14    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Doug Black, a BS in Mathematical Science/Civil Engineering and MBA, joined CRH in 1995 as Vice-President Business Development and in 1996 helped establish Oldcastle Distribution with the acquisition of Allied Building Products. Doug was President of Oldcastle Precast Southeast from 1996 to 2000, was promoted to Chief Operating Officer Oldcastle Architectural in 2000 and was President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Oldcastle Architectural from 2002 to July 2006. Doug was appointed CEO Americas Materials in 2008 after two years serving as President of this Division and became President and Chief Operating Officer, Oldcastle, Inc. (the holding company for CRH’s operations in the Americas) in February 2012.

Henry Morris, a mechanical engineer and MBA, joined Irish Cement Limited as a graduate. He held a number of operational roles in CRH’s cement business prior to his appointment as Managing Director of CRH’s Aerobord business in 1990. Henry left the Group to join Barlo Group plc in 1993 and returned to CRH in 2001 as Regional Director, Finland and Switzerland. He was appointed Chief Operating Officer, Europe Materials in 2007 and Managing Director of the Division in January 2009.

Erik Bax, a building & construction engineer and MBA, joined CRH in 1984 as Manager, New Business at Vaculux and was appointed Managing Director Vaculux in 1993. He subsequently held a number of senior positions in Europe Products & Distribution. Erik became Managing Director CRH Europe Building Products in 2003 and Managing Director CRH Europe Distribution in 2007. He was appointed Managing Director of CRH Europe Products & Distribution in 2010.

Mark Towe was appointed a CRH Board Director with effect from July 2008. A United States citizen, he joined CRH in 1997. In 2000, he was appointed President of Oldcastle Materials, Inc. and became the Chief Executive Officer of this Division in 2006. He was appointed to his current position of Chief Executive Officer of Oldcastle, Inc. (the holding company for CRH’s operations in the Americas) in July 2008. With approximately 40 years’ of experience in the building materials industry, he has overall responsibility for the Group’s aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete operations in the United States and its products and distribution businesses in the Americas.

LOGO

CRH    15


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

2011 Organisation and People

With effect from January 2011, as part of an organisational alignment to accelerate the capture of market growth opportunities while streamlining common business processes and functions, the Architectural, Precast and MMI groups within Americas Products were combined to form a new product group - Building Products - under the leadership of Keith Haas.

This reorganisation has proved very successful and we have now further re-aligned our management structure in the Americas. With effect from 20 February 2012, Doug Black, previously Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Americas Materials, took on the role of President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Oldcastle, Inc. (holding company for CRH’s operations in the Americas) reporting to Oldcastle CEO, Mark Towe. Randy Lake took over from Doug as CEO of Americas Materials, again with effect from 20 February 2012. Keith Haas took on expanded responsibilities with the absorption of our BuildingEnvelope™ operations into the Building Products structure. Randy and Keith, together with Bob Feury, CEO of Americas Distribution, all report to Doug in his role as COO, Oldcastle.

Francisco Irazusta joined Europe Products & Distribution in early 2011 and has assumed responsibility for our Products operations reporting to Erik Bax, Managing Director, Europe Products & Distribution.

In July 2011 Bill Sandbrook resigned from our US operations to take up a position elsewhere in the industry. We thank Bill for his long and committed service over many years.

The average number of employees for the past three financial years is disclosed in note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 126.

No significant industrial disputes have occurred at any of CRH’s factories or plants during the past five years. The Group believes that relations with its employees and labour unions are satisfactory.

16    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Business Overview

The percentage of Group revenue and operating profit for each of the six reporting segments for 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 is as follows:

 

Business Overview

                           
  

2014

 

      

2013

 

    

2012

 

 
      Operating          Operating       Operating 
  2011   2010   2009   

Revenue

 

   

profit

 

      

Revenue

 

   

profit

 

   

Revenue

 

   

profit

 

 
  Revenue   Operating
profit
   Revenue   Operating
profit
   Revenue   Operating
profit
 

Share of revenue and operating

profit

                                   

Europe Materials1

   17%     30%     16%     36%     16%     27%  

Europe Heavyside1

   21%     16%        21%     (395%     22%     23%  

Europe Lightside

   5%     8%        5%     28%       5%     6%  

Europe Distribution

   21%     12%        22%     106%       22%     18%  

Americas Materials

   24%     30%     26%     41%     25%     43%     27%     39%        26%     226%       27%     35%  

Europe Products

   15%     8%     16%     2%     17%     12%  

Americas Products

   13%     5%     14%     -3%     14%     2%     17%     16%        17%     68%       15%     11%  

Europe Distribution

   24%     22%     21%     19%     21%     14%  

Americas Distribution

   7%     5%     7%     5%     7%     2%     9%     9%        9%     67%       9%     7%  

Total

   100%     100%     100%     100%     100%     100%     100%     100%        100%     100%       100%     100%  

1

See “Business Operations in Europe Materials” belowEurope” on page 17 for details of non-European countries grouped with Europe for reporting purposes.

LOGO

CRH      11


LOGO

Operational Snapshot |sector exposure and end-use based on 2014 EBITDA (as defined)*

LOGO

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.
**Net assets at 31 December 2014 comprise segment assets less segment liabilities as disclosed in note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Including equity accounted investments.

12      CRH


LOGO

1Throughout this document annualised volumes have been used which reflect the full-year impact of acquisitions made during the year and may vary from actual volumes produced.
2Throughout this document tonnes denote metric tonnes (i.e. 1,000 kilogrammes).

LOGO

CRH      13


LOGO

14        CRH


LOGO

CRH         15


LOGO

Business Operations in Europe

Europe Heavyside

In 2014, the Group reorganised its European business by integrating its former Materials Division with the concrete and clay businesses of the former Products Division into one Heavyside organisation. The purpose of this reorganisation is to enable CRH to maximise the benefits and synergies of our operating plant network in both Western and Eastern European markets.

Europe Materials’Heavyside’s strategy is to build strongleading regional positions in businesses that are vertically integrated and which have the potential to grow further in the large European construction markets. We deliver our strategy through a focus on a balanced exposure to demand, product penetration and on maximising the benefits of scale and best practice. Our business is differentiated and achieves competitive advantage through a commitment to constant product, process and end-use improvement.

Europe Heavyside is organised into two regional positions. Operatingdivisions: Western Europe, which comprises our cement, aggregates, asphalt, concrete and clay operations primarily in 20 countries, theSwitzerland, Germany, UK, Benelux, France, Denmark, Ireland and Spain, and Eastern Europe which includes our cement, aggregates, asphalt and concrete businesses in Poland, Ukraine and Finland. The business model of vertical integration is founded in resource-backed cement and aggregates assets, which support the manufacture and supply of cement, aggregates, readymixed and precast concrete, concrete landscaping and asphalt products. WithConsequently, a key focus for the Heavyside Division is the ongoing process of extending and adding to reserves. We operate a network of well-invested facilities Europe Materials focuses

and place great emphasis on operational excellence initiatives which includeacross the business. CRH’s approach to Building Better Businesses ensures a focus on achieving greater production efficiencies and realising operational, logistical and procurement synergies across our network. A commitment to a sustainable future results in greater use of alternative fuels and the manufacture of low carbon cements, while the scale of our operations provides economies in purchasing and logistics management.cements.

DevelopmentOur development focus is centred on bolt-on acquisitions for synergies, reserves and further vertical integration, in addition to opportunities in contiguous regions to extend and strengthen regional positions. Europe Materials has championed CRH’s entry intopositions; this includes developing markets in Eastern Europe that offer long-term growth potential, with entry via cement and aggregates assets and the potential to roll out its operational excellence programmes and a vertical integration approach over time. In total, the context of the detailed review of the portfolio undertaken by the Group during 2014, CRH announced in December 2014 that it had reached agreement to dispose of its clay and concrete businesses in the UK. The transaction closed in the first quarter of 2015.

Europe MaterialsHeavyside employs approximately 11,60019,100 people at close to 650 locations.800 locations in 21 countries.

 

Marlux/Stradus Infra created award winning water permeable paving - Virage, shown in this picture. These innovative tiles provide creative opportunities for architects and consumers, where multiple different patterns can be composed with just one element.

LOGO

Products and Services  Location2


Cement

Belgium, China, Finland, India (50%), Ireland, Lebanon (25%), Netherlands, Poland, Portugal (49%), Switzerland, Tunisia (49%), Turkey (50%), Ukraine, United Kingdom

Aggregates

Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal (49%), Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine

Asphalt

Finland, Ireland, Poland, Switzerland

Readymixed Concrete

Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal (49%), Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia (49%), Turkey (50%)

Lime

Ireland, Poland

Concrete Products

Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Poland,

Portugal (49%), Spain, Tunisia (49%), Ukraine

2Excludes associate interests; percentages indicate ownership by CRH where this is not a subsidiary.

CRH    17


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Cement is a primary building material used in the construction industry. It is manufactured by heatingreacting limestone with small quantities of other materials in a kiln through a carefully controlled chemical process thathigh temperature process. This produces clinker, which is then milled into a fine powder to become cement. Cement production is capital-intensive. Cement is used principally as a binding agent to bind other materials together—itstogether – most common usecommonly it is to mix itmixed with sand, stone or other aggregates and water to form concrete.water. Cement customers primarily comprise concrete producers and merchants supplying construction contractors and others. Where CRH has both cement and concrete operations, a significant portion of cement sales wouldis typically be supplied to those concrete operations. While cement or clinker may be imported from other countries, competition comes mainly from other large cement producers located within each country. CRH’s cement activities in Belgium and the Netherlands relate to cement transport and trading.

Aggregates are naturally occurring sand, gravel or crushed stone deposits such as granite, limestone and sandstone. Limestone reserves, which are used to supplyRecycled (end-of-life) concrete increasingly features as an aggregate. CRH cement plants are generally located at or near each plant and are generally owned by CRH.the limestone reserves used to supply the plants. In Finland, CRH buys the aggregatesaggregate raw materials for its two cement plants as the Group does not own limestone reserves near the plants. For additional information on the location and adequacy of all of the Group’s mineral reserves, see the Property, Plants and EquipmentMineral Reserves section on pages 2628 and 29.

Concrete Products and Readymixed Concrete: In addition to 28.readymixed concrete CRH manufactures other concrete products for two principal end-uses: pavers, tiles and blocks for architectural use, and floor and wall elements, beams and vaults for structural use. In addition, sand-lime bricks are produced for the residential market. Principal raw materials include cement, crushed stone and sand and gravel, all of which are readily available locally.

TheClay Products group principally produces clay facing bricks, pavers, blocks and rooftiles.

Aggregates, asphalt and related services are sold principally to local governmental highway authorities and to contractors, while readymixedcontractors. Readymixed concrete, and concrete products (manufactured mainly at locations with aggregates on site and including block, masonry, pipe, rooftiles and paving) and clay products are sold to both the public and private construction sectors. Competition comes mainly from other large aggregates, asphalt, readymixed concrete, and concrete products producers and clay producers, as well as from a variety of smaller manufacturers in local economies.

The division is organised geographically by country/region.

Joint Venture Interests

CRH holds 49% of Secil, a Portuguese manufacturer of cement and readymixed concrete acquired by CRH in 2004, and has joint management control of this business. In Portugal, Secil operates three integrated cement plants, a number of readymixed concrete plants and hard rock quarries, and produces precast concrete products and mortars. Secil is also a prominent producer of cement in southeastern Tunisia and has 51% investments in an integrated cement plant in Lebanon and a cement grinding operation located in the south of Angola.

CRH holds 50% joint venture stakes in Denizli Cimento, an integrated cement and readymixed concrete business in Turkey, andequity interest in My Home Industries Limited (“MHIL”), a cement producer headquartered in Hyderabad serving the Andhra Pradesh regionand Telangana regions of Southeastsoutheast India. In November 2014, CRH disposed of its 50% equity interest in Denizli Çimento, an integrated cement and readymixed concrete business in Turkey. Details of this disposal are set out in note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 151.

Associate Interests

CRH hasholds a 26% equity interest in Corporación Uniland S.A.Yatai Building Materials Company’s cement operations (“Uniland”Yatai Cement��), a major Spanish manufacturer of cement, readymixed concrete, mortar and aggregates with additional cement and readymixed concrete interestsoperations in Tunisia.

Jilin, Heilongjiang and Liaoning provinces in northeastern China. CRH has a 25% equity interest in Mashav, the holding company for the sole producer of cement in Israel.

In 2009, CRH acquired a 26% equity interest in Yatai Building Materials Company’s cement operations (Yatai Cement), with cement and concrete operations in Jilin, Heilongjiang and Liaoning provinces in northeastern China.

18    CRH


Description of the Group

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPProducts and Services - Locations1

Cement

Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Aggregates

Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine

Asphalt

Ireland, Poland, Switzerland

Readymixed Concrete

Belgium, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine

Lime

Ireland, Poland

Concrete Products

Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine

Clay Products

Germany, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom

 

 

 

1Excludes joint venture and associate interests. Results for these entities are equity accounted in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

LOGO

CRH      17


LOGO

Business Operations in Europe| continued

Europe Lightside

Europe Lightside produces and supplies high-value, award-winning products, expert solutions and other technologies for often challenging construction projects. The Division is organised into four business areas: Construction Accessories, Shutters & Awnings, Fencing and Cubis (composite access chambers). We buy, build and grow business units with market-leading positions and strong growth prospects, selling through a range of flagship brands at a regional and European level.

The Lightside Division grows both organically and by acquisition to create leading positions within our chosen markets. We maximise synergies across the business in the areas of performance improvement, procurement, talent management and product development.

We have a relentless focus on innovation. Lightside customers are specialist end-users, including architects and engineers. Using our pan-European presence and scale, we work closely with them to develop design solutions that are approved and certified for individual target markets.

We draw upon an outstanding record of enabling mature and high-growth businesses alike to expand their offerings, and develop their markets. Lightside has achieved consistently attractive returns. The resilience of these returns reflects active, balanced management of our product range and our geographic and business-cycle exposures.

Our development strategy is to deepen our positions in existing markets and technologies in developed European markets, to broaden our product range in selected growth categories, and to expand our presence in developing regions outside Europe as construction markets in those areas become more sophisticated.

This strategy complements CRH’s aim to provide innovative solutions that meet the longer-term opportunities presented by economic development, changing demographics and sustainability.

Employees total approximately 5,000 people at circa 100 operating locations in 17 countries.

OurConstruction Accessories businesses supply a broad range of connecting, fixing and anchor systems to the construction industry.

Shutters & Awnings serve the attractive RMI and residential end-use markets, supplying sun protection, energy-saving, and outdoor living technologies.

Fencing designs, manufactures and installs fully integrated perimeter security solutions.

Cubis manufactures composite access chambers and access covers for telecoms, rail, roads, water and power.

Competition comes mainly from a limited number of multi-country Lightside suppliers as well as from a variety of smaller manufacturers in local economies and some from more traditional products/solutions (substitutes).

Products and Services - Locations

Construction Accessories

Australia, Austria, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden, United Kingdom

Shutters & Awnings

Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Fencing and Cubis (Composite Access Chambers)

France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

18      CRH


Europe Distribution

Europe Distribution’s strategy is to grow its network presence in the largely unconsolidated core European markets while also investing in other attractive segments of building materials distribution. Operational excellence is delivered through optimising the supply chain and providing superior customer service.

We have leading General Builders Merchant positions in the Netherlands, Switzerland, northern Germany, Austria and France which service the growing repair, maintenance and improvement construction sector. Our businesses cater to the needs of small and medium-sized builders, selling a range of bricks, cement, roofing and other building products.

Our specialist Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (“SHAP”) business services the needs of plumbers, heating specialists and installers in Belgium, Germany and Switzerland.

In addition, Europe Distribution operates under four DIY brands: GAMMA (Netherlands and Belgium), Karwei (Netherlands), Hagebau (Germany) and Maxmat (Portugal) selling to DIY enthusiasts and home improvers.

Significant opportunities remain to expand our existing network and to gain exposure to rising RMI demand and new growth platforms.

Europe Distribution employs over 11,600 people at 659 locations.

Professional Builders Merchants

Professional Builders Merchants cater to the heavyside sector and competition is encountered primarily from other merchanting chains and local individual merchants. CRH operates 167 branches in the Benelux and in Switzerland, the Group has a strong position as the largest builders merchant. CRH is a major regional distributor in France, with 52 locations. The Group also has a strong regional presence in the northwest of Germany.

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (SHAP)

Our SHAP business has been key to strengthening our exposure to growing RMI market demand. It operates in Belgium, Germany and Switzerland with a total network of 132 branches. In Switzerland, the Group has a strong position as the only country-wide supplier of SHAP products.

DIY

CRH operates 135 Karwei and GAMMA DIY stores in the Netherlands and 19 GAMMA stores in Belgium. The stores operate within the Intergamma franchise organisation, the largest DIY group in the Benelux. Buying and advertising is undertaken by Intergamma, which is owned by its franchisees. In Germany, Bauking operates 30 DIY stores under the brand name Hagebau. In Portugal, Maxmat is a 50% joint venture cash and carry DIY chain with 30 stores.

Associate Interests

CRH holds a 21.13% equity interest in Samse S.A., a publicly-quoted distributor of building materials to the merchanting sector in the Rhône-Alpes region.

Products and Services - Locations1

Professional Builders Merchants

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (“SHAP”)

Benelux, Germany, Switzerland

DIY Stores

Belgium, Germany, Netherlands

1Excludes joint venture and associate interests. Results for these entities are equity accounted in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

LOGO

CRH      19


LOGO


LOGO

CRH         21


LOGO

Business Operations in the Americas

Americas Materials

Americas Materials’ strategy is to build strong regional leadership positions underpinned by well-located, long-term reserves. OperatingWe are the largest producer of asphalt and the third largest producer of both aggregates and readymixed concrete in the United States. We operate nationally in 44 states with 12.4over 13 billion tonnes of permitted aggregates reserves of which circa 80% are owned, thisowned. The business is vertically integrated from primary resource quarries into aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete products. With 65%60% exposure to infrastructure, the business is further integrated into asphalt paving services through which it is a principalthe leading supplier of product to US highway repair and maintenance demand.demand in the United States.

Our national network of operations and deep local market knowledge drive local performance and national synergies in procurement, cost management and operational excellence. In a largely unconsolidated sector where the top ten industry participants account for just 30% of US aggregates production, 25% of asphalt production and 20%25% of readymixed concrete production, CRHCRH’s strategy is structured and positionedto position the business to participate as the industry consolidates further.

Americas Materials employs approximately 17,80018,400 people at close to 1,200 operating locations.

Products and ServicesLocation

Aggregates

US

Asphalt

US

Readymixed Concrete

US

The Division is the largest asphalt producer and the third-largest producer of both aggregates and readymixed concrete in the US. For additional information on the location and adequacy of all of the Group’s mineral reserves, see the Property, Plants and EquipmentMineral Reserves section on pages 26 to 28.28 and 29.

The DivisionAmericas Materials is broadly self-sufficient in aggregates and its principal purchased raw materials are liquid asphalt and cement used in the manufacturing of asphalt and readymixed concrete respectively. These raw materials are available from a number of suppliers. There is a continued focus on improving bitumen and energy purchasing and we continue to source the lowest cost alternative energy for use in asphalt production.

Federal, state and local government authority road and infrastructural projects awarded by public bid represent a significant proportion of work carried out by the Division. The DivisionAmericas Materials also has a broad commercial base, supplying stone, readymixed concrete and asphalt for industrial, office, shopping mall and private residential development and refurbishment.

The Americas Materials Division is organised geographically into East and West, containingdivided into four and three divisionsfurther sub-regions respectively.

East:

Northeast (including operations in Maine, New England,Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut);

Mid-Atlantic (Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Kentucky eastern Tennessee and North Carolina);

Central (Ohio, Indiana and Michigan); and

Southeast (Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina and Florida).

West:

Central West (Texas, Oklahoma,(Oklahoma, Arkansas, Mississippi, western Tennessee, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois, South Dakota and South Dakota)Texas);

Mountain West (Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Montana, New Mexico, southern Idaho, Nevada and Arizona); and

Northwest (Washington, Oregon, Montana and northern Idaho).

 

CRH    19


Description of the Group

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPProducts and Services - Locations

 

 

Aggregates

Business Operations in Europe Products

Europe Products’ strategy is to build and grow scalable businesses in the large European construction markets. The strategy is delivered by increasing the penetration of CRH products, developing positions to benefit from scale and best practice. We create competitive advantage through product, process and end-use innovation, while maintaining a balanced exposure to demand drivers.

Operating in 19 countries, this business is a regional leader in concrete products, concrete landscaping, clay products, construction accessories and entrance control systems. Leveraging the benefits of our regional platforms, we realise operational and procurement synergies across the network. Pan-European product development provides construction solutions which increase efficiencies on site, creating more design freedom for architects and enhancing the built environment. Europe Products’ development strategy is to further penetrate the growing RMI markets of developed Europe and to broaden the product range in developing regions as construction markets in those regions become more sophisticated. This Segment employs approximately 16,600 people at close to 400 operating locations.United States

 

Asphalt

United States

Readymixed Concrete

United States

Products and ServicesLocation

Concrete Products

22      CRH
  

Architectural Concrete

Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Slovakia, UK

Precast Concrete

Belgium, Denmark, France, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Switzerland, UK

Clay Products

Germany, Netherlands, Poland, UK

Building Products

Construction Accessories

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden, UK

Fencing & Security

France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, UK

Concrete Products

This group manufactures concrete products for two principal end-uses: pavers, tiles and blocks for architectural use, and floor and wall elements, beams and vaults for structural use. In addition, sand-lime bricks are produced for the residential market. Principal raw materials include cement, crushed stone and sand and gravel, all of which are readily available locally.

Clay Products

The Clay Products group principally produces clay facing bricks, pavers, blocks and rooftiles, with the Ibstock operation in the UK being the largest business.

Building Products

The Building Products group is active in lightside building materials and is the European market leader in outdoor security and construction accessories.

The Construction Accessories group is a market leader in construction accessories in Europe, supplying metal-based accessories, including stainless steel fixing systems, for the construction and precast concrete industries.

The Fencing & Security business unit is mainly active in the non-residential construction market. The business unit comprises Fencing & Security (“F&S”), Shutters & Barriers (“S&B”), Access Control and Roller Shutters & Awnings (“RSA”) businesses which specialise in entrance control and climate control products.


 

20    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

F&S, together with Access Control, is a supplier of security solutions, which includes designing and manufacturing fencing and security gate systems and supplying access control systems for the building industry, manufacturing industry, sports and recreational areas, power stations and airports. Raw materials for fencing and security gate manufacturing comprise steel, aluminium, reinforced glass fiber, chain-link fabric and barbed wire purchased from a variety of sources. The RSA group specialises in developing, assembling and distributing roller shutter and awning systems.

Following rigorous strategic analysis, we decided at the end of 2009 to exit the Insulation and Climate Control sectors as we no longer saw a route to becoming a pan-European leader in these segments. The first half of 2011 saw completion of this divestment.

Business Operations in Americas Products

Americas Products’ strategy is to build a national footprint of an optimised portfolio of businesses which offer regional leadershiphave leading market positions across a fullbalanced range of Buildingproducts and end-use segments. Our activities are organised into three product groups under the Oldcastle brand: Architectural Products (precast(concrete masonry and architectural concrete,hardscapes, clay and fencing products,brick, packaged lawn and garden products, packaged cement mixes, fencing); Precast (utility, drainage and packaged concrete mixes)structural precast, construction accessories); and BuildingEnvelope® solutions (glass (architectural glass and aluminium glazing systems) under the Oldcastle brand name. A. The Group’s commitment to Building Better Businesses ensures a coordinated approach at both a national and regional level achieveslevels to achieve economies of scale and facilitatesto facilitate the sharing of best practices which drive operational and commercial improvement. ThroughInnovation is a hallmark of the business, and through Oldcastle’s North American research and development centre,centres, a continuous pipeline of innovative value-added products and design solutions areis maintained.

OperatingIn the context of the detailed review of the portfolio undertaken by the Group during 2014, CRH announced in 40December 2014 that it had reached agreement to dispose of its Glen-Gery clay business in the United States. The transaction closed in the first quarter of 2015.

A national business operating in 39 US states, six Canadian provinces, Mexico and South America. CRH has the breadth of product range and national footprint to providethat combines providing a national service to customers with the personal touch of a local supplier. Focussing on strategic accounts and national accounts,influencers in the newconstruction supply chain, the Oldcastle Building Solutions initiativegroup provides an additional platformavenue for growth as it is uniquely positioned in the industry to offer solutions to customerscreate value for stakeholders across all phases of building construction. Employees total

The number of employees in this division totals approximately 14,90017,700 at close to 380nearly 400 locations.

Products and ServicesLocation

Architectural Concrete

Canada, US

Clay

Argentina, US
Precast Concrete, Pipe and Prestress ProductsCanada, US

Glass Fabrication

Glazing Systems

Argentina, Canada, Chile, US

Canada, US

Construction Accessories

US

Fencing Products

Mexico, US

Building Products

Architectural Products Group (“APG”) , which is a leading North American producer of concrete masonry and hardscape products, packaged lawn and garden products, prepackaged cement mixes, clay brick and lightweight aggregates, services the USUnited States and eastern Canada from 234249 operating locations in 39 states and twosix Canadian provinces. The residential and non-residential sectors combined account for 95% of APG’s output, a significant proportion of which is used in the RMI and DIYDo-It-Yourself (“DIY”) sectors. Competition for APG arises primarily from other locally-owned products companies. Principal raw material supplies are readily available.

APG’s concrete masonry products are used for cladding, walls and foundations. Hardscape products comprise pavers, retaining wall products and patio products.

Lawn and garden products, mainly bagged and bulk mulch, soil and specialty stone products, are marketed to major DIY and homecenter chains across the United States. Cementitious dry-mixes,

CRH    21


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Cement mixes, marketed under thebrands such as Sakrete® and ProSpec® brands,, and lightweight aggregateaggregates are also important product lines. Merchants Metals is also part of APG, also includes Glen-Gery Corporation, a clay brick producer located primarilyleading manufacturer and distributor of fencing and related products, used by the residential, non-residential and infrastructure sectors.

LOGO

CRH      23


LOGO

Business Operations in the northeast and midwest regions of the United States and includes Merchants Metals, which supplies thousands of specialised products used in concrete construction activities.Americas| continued

Americas Productscontinued

The Precast group produces precast, prestressed and polymer concrete products, small plastic box enclosures and concrete pipe in the USUnited States and Canada with 8479 operating locations in 2524 states and the province of Quebec.

The most significant precast concrete products are underground vaults sold principally to water, electrical and telephone utilities. Other precast items include drainage and sanitary sewer products such as pipe, manholes, inlets and catch basins, and street and highway products such as median barriers, culverts and short span bridges. In many instances, precast products are an alternative to poured-in-place concrete, which is a significant competing product. Plastic enclosures are also supplied to water, electrical and telephone utilities. Polymer trench is sold to the electric and railroad market.

The Precast group’s Building Systems and Modular groupbusiness manufactures and installs pre-stressedprestressed concrete flooring plank, modular precast structures and other products. These products are used mainly in structures such as hotels, apartments, dormitories and prisons.

Concrete pipe is used for storm and sanitary sewer applications, which are largely local government projects. Competing materials include corrugated steel pipe and high-density polyethylene pipe in storm sewer applications and plastic pipe in sanitary sewer applications.

Precast also includes the Meadow Burke operations, a leading manufacturer and distributerwhich supplies thousands of fencing and relatedspecialised products used by the residential, non-residential and infrastructure sectors.in concrete construction activities.

BuildingEnvelope™

BuildingEnvelope™BuildingEnvelope® (“BE”) custom manufactures architectural glass and engineered aluminium glazing systems for multi-storey commercial, institutional and residential construction. With close to 4,100approximately 4,800 people and 52 locations in 2322 states and four Canadian provinces, BE is the largest supplier of high-performance glazing products and services in North America, delivering to all of the top 50 MSAs (MetropolitanMetropolitan Statistical Areas)Areas (MSAs) in the USUnited States and to Canada.

Tempered glass and engineered aluminium glazing systems are building products with major applications in the RMI construction sector and have a wide range of architectural applications. The architectural glass product range includes insulated, spandrel, laminated, security and sound control glass manufactured in a

variety of shapes, thicknesses, colours and qualities. The engineeredEngineered aluminium glazing systems product range includesinclude a broad range of storefront and entrances, curtain wall and architectural windows.

South America

CRH operates five differentsix companies in Argentina and Chile.

Canteras Cerro Negro is a clay roofing, wall and floor tiles producer. It owns two state-of-the-art production facilities in Olavarría, 330 kilometres southwest of Buenos Aires and a greenfield manufacturing facility in Cordoba, which commenced production in 2009.Cordoba. Cormela acquired during 2008, produces clay block at a facility in Campana, 60 kilometres (“km”) from Buenos Aires.

Ladrillos Olavarria (LOSA), acquired in 2013, produces clay blocks and floor tiles from a plant located in Olavarría. Superglass (Argentina) and Vidrios Dell Orto (Chile) fabricate tempered, laminated and insulated glass.

Comercial Duomo is a specialised construction products retailer and wholesaler in Chile which was acquired in 2008.Chile.

 

22    CRH


Description of the Group

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPProducts and Services - Locations

 

 

Architectural Concrete

Business Operations in Europe Distribution

Europe Distribution’s strategy is to seek opportunities to increase its network density in the largely unconsolidated core European markets while also investing in other attractive segments of building materials distribution. Organisational initiatives leverage expertise between DIY and builders merchants and use best-in-class IT to deliver operational excellence, optimise the supply chain and provide superior customer service.

From a solid base in the Netherlands, CRH has extensively expanded its leading Builders Merchants positions in Switzerland, Germany, Austria and France in addition to growing its DIY “Gamma” format in the Benelux. Substantial opportunities remain to increase our existing network in core European markets and to establish new platforms aimed at growing our exposure to RMI market demand. A recent example is CRH’s entry into the developing Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (“SHAP”) distribution market through the acquisition of a Swiss provider of high-end sanitary ware, since replicated in contiguous markets in Germany and Belgium. Europe Distribution employs approximately 12,100 people at over 760 operating locations.Canada, United States

 

Clay

Argentina, United States

Precast Concrete, Pipe and Prestress Products

Canada, United States

Glass Fabrication

Argentina, Canada, Chile, United States

Glazing Systems

Canada, United States

Concrete Accessories

United States

Fencing Products

Mexico, United States

Products and Services24      CRH  Location1

Builders Merchants

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland

DIY Stores

Benelux, Germany and Portugal (50%)

1Excludes associate interests; percentages indicate percentage ownership by CRH where this is not a subsidiary.

Builders Merchants

Professional Builders Merchants caters to the heavyside sector selling a range of bricks, cement, roofing and other building products mainly to small and medium-sized builders. Competition in merchanting is encountered primarily from other merchanting chains and local individual merchants. In Switzerland, the Group has a strong position as the largest builders merchant and the only country-wide supplier of SHAP products. CRH is a major regional distributor in France, with 100 locations. In 2010, CRH acquired an additional 50% of Bauking, in which CRH already had a 47.82% stake. Bauking is a major regional player in the northwest of Germany with 81 locations. Sax Sanitair, acquired in August 2010, is a leading SHAP distributor in Belgium where the group now has 20 SHAP locations.

In addition, CRH holds a 21.13% equity interest in Samse S.A., a publicly-quoted distributor of building materials to the merchanting sector in the Rhône-Alpes region.

During 2011 we sold our activities in Afast B.V., a specialist roofing business as well as our 35% equity interest in Trialis, a General Builders Merchant in France.

DIY

The DIY Europe platform operates under five different brands: GAMMA (the Netherlands and Belgium), Karwei (the Netherlands), Hagebau (Germany) and Maxmat (Portugal) selling to DIY enthusiasts and home improvers. CRH operates 138 Karwei and GAMMA DIY stores in the Netherlands and 19 GAMMA stores in Belgium. The stores operate within the Intergamma franchise organisation, the largest DIY group in the Benelux. Buying and advertising is undertaken by Intergamma, which is owned by its franchisees. In Germany, Bauking operates 51 DIY stores under the brand name Hagebau. In Portugal, Maxmat is a 50% joint venture cash and carry DIY chain with 33 stores.

CRH    23


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Business Operations in Americas Distribution

Americas Distribution’sDistribution strategy is focussed on being the leading supplier to contractors of choice to the professionalExterior Products such as roofing and siding contractor and to applyingsiding. We also apply this successful distribution model to the Interior Products demand segment. such as ceilings and walls.

Demand in the Exterior Products business is largely influenced by residential and commercial replacement activity with the key products having an average life spanlifespan of 25 to 30 years. The

Demand for Interior Products division has less exposure to replacement activity as demand is largely driven by the new residential, multi-family and commercial construction market. State-of-the-artmarkets.

Through CRH’s commitment to continuous business improvement, we employ state-of-the-art IT systems, disciplined and focussed cash and asset management, and well-established procurement and commercial systems which support supply chain optimisation and enable CRHus to provide superior customer service.

GrowthAmericas Distribution operates in 31 states, and growth opportunities include investment in new regions,and existing markets, in complementary private label and energy-efficientenergy-saving product offerings, and in other attractive building materials distribution segments that service professional dealer networks. Employees total

The Division employs approximately 3,3003,800 people at over 190 operating198 locations.

Products and ServicesLocation

Exterior Products (Roofing/Siding)

US

Interior Products

US

OldcastleAmericas Distribution, trading primarily as Allied Building Products (“Allied”), is a large distributor in the Roofing/Siding segmentroofing, siding and interior products segments in the United States. Demand is largely influenced byAllied’s Exterior Products segment distributes both commercial and residential roofing, siding and commercial replacement activity, with the keyrelated products having an average life spanand accounts for approximately 60% of roughly 25 years.annualised Distribution sales. Allied’s Interior Products segment accounts for approximately 34% of annualised Distribution sales. The primary customers are drywalldistributes primarily to specialised contractors who are mainly involved in new residential, multi-family and new commercial construction.

 

24    CRH


Description of the GroupProducts and Services - Locations

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Exterior Products

United States

Interior Products

United States

 

 

 

Development and Portfolio ReviewLOGO

Acquisition and investment spend amounted to0.5 billion in 2009 on a total of 17 transactions. First-half expenditure of0.3 billion included the purchase of a 26% associate stake in Yatai Cement, the leading cement manufacturer in northeastern China, plus six other acquisitions across the Group’s Materials and Distribution segments. Second-half spending of0.2 billion principally comprised four important bolt-on transactions in the Americas Materials Division completed in November/December plus six smaller Materials transactions in Poland, China and the US.

Total acquisition spend (including debt acquired and deferred and contingent acquisition consideration) for 2010 was567 million, which included 28 traditional bolt-on acquisitions. First half expenditure of159 million included 13 acquisitions across the Materials segments of the Group’s businesses in Europe and the United States, and a further investment in northeastern China where an associate, Yatai Building Materials, continued to expand its position. The second half of the year saw a welcome pick-up in the pace of development activity with total expenditure of408 million. This included a series of nine further bolt-on acquisitions by the Americas Materials business, extending their geographic reach; in total in 2010, acquisitions by this Division added a total of 579 million tonnes of well-located aggregates reserves across the United States. In Europe in the second half of the year, the Group added to its materials footprint in Switzerland, and, with the buyout of an additional 50% of the Bauking joint venture, substantially expanded the Group’s presence in the attractive German distribution market.

Total acquisition spend for 2011 amounted to610 million on a total of 45 bolt-on transactions which will contribute annualised sales of circa500 million, of which157 million has been reflected in our 2011 results. Expenditure of163 million in the first half included 22 acquisition and investment initiatives across all six operating segments strengthening our existing market positions and adding valuable and well-located aggregates reserves. The second half of the year saw a step-up in the pace of development activity with expenditure of447 million on 23 acquisitions including the VVM Group in Belgium, an important strategic add-on for our existing Benelux-based Cementbouw business. We also saw a welcome return to development activity in our Americas Distribution business which added a total of 24 branches in 4 transactions in the second half of 2011.

Total proceeds from completed disposals in 2011 amounted to492 million. The previously announced divestments of Europe Products’ Insulation and Climate Control businesses, together with the disposal of our 35% associate investment in the Trialis distribution business in France, were completed in the first half of the year, while the second half saw the sale of our seawater magnesia operation in Ireland. The sales impact of these disposals, and of the disposal in November 2010 of our Ivy Steel business in the United States, was a reduction of469 million in 2011.

 

CRH    25

CRH      25


Description of the GroupLOGO

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Property, Plants and Equipment

At 23 March 2012, CRH and its joint ventures had a total of 2,615 building materials production locations and had a total of 955 Merchanting & DIY locations. 1,496 locations are leased, with the remaining 2,074 locations held on a freehold basis. Further details on locations and products produced are provided under the Business Overview section. None of CRH’s individual properties are of material significance to the Group.

The most significant subsidiary locations are the cement facilities in Ireland, Finland, Poland, Switzerland and Ukraine. The capacity for these locations is as follows:

Subsidiary  Country  No. of Plants  Clinker Capacity
(tonnes per hour)

Irish Cement

  Ireland  2  440

Finnsementti

  Finland  2  180

Grupa Ożarów

  Poland  1  340

JURA-Holding

  Switzerland  2  116

OJSC Podilsky Cement

  Ukraine  1  445

CRH believes that all the facilities are in good condition, adequate for their purpose and suitably utilised according to the individual nature and requirements of the relevant operations. CRH has a continuing programme of improvements and replacements to properties when considered appropriate to meet the needs of the individual operations. Further information in relation to the Company’s accounting policy and process governing any impairment of property, plant and equipment is given on pages 109 and 110 and in note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 133.

In Poland, CRH operates a modern dry-process kiln at Ożarów, approximately 170 km south east of Warsaw, with a total annual clinker production capacity of 2.6 million tonnes. Management is reviewing the timing of the requirement for additional cement capacity in Poland, and accordingly further expenditure on the expansion project at Ożarów which was announced in 2007 has been postponed.

The Group operates one cement plant in southwest Ukraine which produced 1.4 million tonnes of cement in 2011. Conversion of the wet-process cement plant to a dry-process plant with 2.5 million tonnes clinker capacity began in August 2011 with the commissioning period complete by year-end. The242 million investment project was the first-ever joint implementation project registered by the United Nations, and the new production line is delivering significant efficiency savings and reduced CO2 emissions.

 

26        CRH


DescriptionChina and India– Equity Accounted Investments

China

Market conditions in China remained challenging during 2014 as government policies to rebalance the economy towards a more sustainable growth model impacted on industrial and real estate activity. This resulted in a slowdown which created an unfavourable short-term environment for the construction sector. Profitability at our 26% associate, Yatai Building Materials, which is a market leader in Northeast China with a capacity of 32 million tonnes of cement, was affected by lower volumes and selling prices; partially offset by improved operational efficiencies and reduced costs.

India

CRH has a cement capacity of 8 million tonnes across three locations in Southern India, where it operates through a 50% joint venture; My Home Industries Limited (“MHIL”). The regional market has a cement consumption of 75 million tonnes and MHIL is the Groupmarket leader in the southern states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

In 2014, MHIL posted a 25% increase in volumes following the acquisition of Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited in late 2013 and has also made significant gains in adjoining states. Prices were under pressure in the first half due to poor demand, but improved later in the year. Volume growth and acquisition synergies resulted in higher trading profit in 2014.

Outlook

In China trading conditions looking forward are expected to recover as the country’s underlying urbanisation trends drive investment in infrastructure and property. Business performance will be further helped by stricter government measures to reduce overcapacity combined with internal commercial and operational excellence initiatives.

Demand for cement in India is expected to show strong growth of over 8% with the government providing a boost to public infrastructure spending and various housing projects in both urban and rural areas.

Products and Services - Locations

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

Cement

China, India

Aggregates

China, India

Readymixed Concrete

China, India

Precast Concrete

China

Construction Accessories

China

 

 

 

Pictured outside the My Home Industries (MHIL) office, in Hyderabad, India, is the Hyderabad Metro Rail, a rapid transit system currently under construction. To date, MHIL has supplied over 19,000 tonnes of cement to the project which is expected to be completed by July 2017.

LOGO

LOGO


LOGO

Mineral Reserves

 

  Activities with Reserves Backing1

 

 
            Property acreage
(hectares)
2
           Percentage of mineral reserves
by rock type
     
   Physical
Location
  Number of
quarries/
pits
     Owned   Leased   Proven &
probable
reserves
3
   Years to
depletion
4
   Hard
rock
   Sand &
gravel
   Other   2014
Annualised
extraction
5
 
  Europe Heavyside                                                  
  Cement  Ireland   2       249     -     217     133     100%     -     -     2.0  
   Poland   2       293     -     185     49     93%     6%     1%     4.0  
   Spain   1       32     -     86     602     100%     -     -     0.2  
   Switzerland   3       165     6     26     17     92%     -     8%     1.6  
   Ukraine   8       871     -     164     62     98%     -     2%     3.0  
  Aggregates  Finland   157       685     399     190     15     70%     30%     -     11.6  
   Ireland   128       5,091     70     897     85     84%     16%     -     10.8  
   Poland   10       466     -     182     20     70%     30%     -     8.5  
   Spain   11       172     184     98     43     99%     1%     -     2.3  
   Other   40       287     526     173     22     74%     26%     -     7.7  
  Lime  Ireland, Poland   2       105     -     46     46     100%     -     -     0.8  
  Clay6  UK, Poland   51       2,793     189     109     49     -     5%     95%     2.4  
  Subtotals      415       11,209     1,374     2,373          82%     13%     5%    
  Americas Materials                                                  
  Aggregates  East   274       24,793     5,095     9,181     125     87%     13%     -     77.3  
   West   469       20,651     16,067     4,042     76     44%     56%     -     58.5  
  Subtotals      743       45,444     21,162     13,223          74%     26%     -    
  Americas Products                                                  
  Clay6  United States   25       1,640     308     76     59     -     -     100%     1.6  
  Group totals      1,183       58,293     22,844     15,672          75%     24%     1%       

1     The disclosures made in this category refer to those facilities which are engaged in on-site processing of reserves in the various forms.

2     1 hectare equals approximately 2.47 acres.

3     Where reserves are leased, the data presented above is restricted to include only that material which can be produced over the life of the contractual commitment inherent in the lease; the totals shown pertain only to amounts which are proven and probable. All of the proven and probable reserves are permitted and are quoted in millions of tonnes.

4     Years to depletion is based on the average of the most recent three years annualised production.

5     Annualised extraction is quoted in millions of tonnes.

6     Includes 104 million tonnes of proven and probable reserves in relation to businesses classified as held for sale. See further details in note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Group’s reserves for the production of primary building materials (which encompass cement, lime, aggregates (stone, and sand &and gravel), clay products, asphalt, readymixed concrete and concrete products) fall into a variety of categories spanning a wide number of rock types and geological classifications—classifications – see the table on the next pageabove setting out the activities with reserves backing.

Reserve estimates are generally prepared by third-party experts (i.e. geologists or engineers) prior to acquisition; this procedure

is a critical component in the Group’s due diligence process in connection with any acquisition. Subsequent to acquisition, estimates are typically updated by company engineers and/or geologists and are reviewed annually by corporate and/or Divisionaldivisional staff. However, where deemed appropriate by management, in the context of large or strategically important deposits, the services of third-party consultant geologists and/or engineers may be employed to validate reserves quantities outside of the aforementioned due diligence framework on an ongoing basis. The Group has not

28      CRH


employed third-parties to review reserves over the three-year period ending 31 December 20112014 other than in business combination activityactivities and specific instances where such review was warranted.

Reserve estimates are subject to annual review by each of the relevant operating entities across the Group. The estimation process distinguishes between owned and leased reserves segregated into permitted and unpermitted as appropriate and includes only those permitted reserves which are proven and probable. The term “permitted” reserves refers to those tonnages which can currently be mined without any environmental or legal constraints. Permitted owned reserve estimates are based on estimated recoverable tonnes whilst permitted leased reserve estimates are based on estimated total recoverable tonnes which may be extracted over the term of the lease contract.

Proven and probable reserve estimates are based on recoverable tonnes only and are thus stated net of estimated production losses and other matters factored into the computation (e.g. required slopes/benches). In order for reserves to qualify for inclusion in the “proven and probable” category, the following conditions must be satisfied:

 

Thethe reserves must be homogeneous deposits based on drill data and/or local geology; and

 

Thethe deposits must be located on owned land or on land subject to long-term lease.

None of CRH’s mineral-bearing properties areis individually material to the Group.

 

CRH    27


Description of the Group

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPProperty, Plants and Equipment

At 6 March 2015, CRH had a total of 2,380 building materials production locations and 857 Merchanting and DIY locations. 1,461 locations are leased, with the remaining 1,776 locations held on a freehold basis.

The most significant subsidiary locations are the cement facilities in Ireland, Finland, Poland, Switzerland, Ukraine and Spain. The capacity for these locations is set out in the table to the right. Further details on locations and products manufactured are provided in the Business Operations sections on pages 14 to 25. None of CRH’s individual properties is of material significance to the Group.

CRH believes that all the facilities are in good condition, adequate for their purpose and suitably utilised according to the individual nature and requirements of the relevant operations. CRH has a continuing programme of improvements and replacements to properties when considered appropriate to meet the needs of the individual operations. Further information in relation to the Group’s accounting policy and process governing any impairment of property, plant and equipment is given on page 141 and in note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 158.

 

 

   Significant Locations – Clinker Capacity

 

  

    Subsidiary

 

Country

 

 

Number
of plants

 

 

Clinker Capacity
(tonnes per hour)

 

 
    Irish Cement Ireland   2   288  
    Finnsementti Finland   2   181  
    Grupa Ożarów Poland   1   342  
    JURA-Holding Switzerland   2   116  
    OJSC Podilsky Cement Ukraine   1   313  
    Cementos Lemona Spain   1   92  

 

 

 

Activities with Reserves Backing*1

   Physical
location
 

Number

of
quarries
/pits

  

Property acreage

(hectares)2

  

Proven

&
probable
reserves
3

  

Years to
depletion
4

   

Percentage of mineral
reserves by

rock type

  

2011
Annualised
extraction
5

 
    Owned    Leased       
 
Hard
rock
  
  
  
 
Sand &
gravel
  
  
  Other   

Europe Materials

           

Cement

 Ireland  2    249    -    131    67     100  -    -    1.0  
 Poland  2    252    -    68    19     97  -    3  3.1  
 Switzerland  3    165    -    11    8     95  -    5  1.1  
 Ukraine  4    295    -    107    61     69  -    31  2.1  
 Other  20    621    359    525    90     66  -    34  5.5  

Aggregates

 Finland  158    490    315    193    11     60  40  -    20.4  
 Ireland  95    4,711    72    850    66     83  17  -    10.6  
 Poland  12    1,575    206    258    29     55  45  -    10.6  
 Spain  8    68    197    106    62     100  -    -    1.2  
 Other  42    527    575    333    32     85  15  -    10.4  

Lime

 Ireland /Poland  3    465    -    50    36     100  -    -    1.0  

Subtotals

    349    9,418    1,724    2,632         77  15  8    

Americas Materials

           

Aggregates

 East  262    23,689    4,607    7,757    118     89  11  -    68.1  
 

West

  429    20,483    15,817    4,661    102     42  58  -    48.5  

Cement

 American Cement  1    51    -    10    60     100  -    -    0.2  

Subtotals

    692    44,223    20,424    12,428         72  28        

Europe Products

           

Clay

 UK, Poland  56    3,009    717    122    53     -    5  95  2.0  

Americas Products

           

Clay

 United States  25    1,510    308    76    54     -    -    100  1.1  

Group totals

    1,122    58,160    23,173    15,258         71  26  3    

*CRH’s share of the reserves and the annualised production of its joint ventures are proportionately consolidated in the table.

1The disclosures made in this category refer to those facilities which are engaged in on-site processing of reserves in the various forms.

21 hectare equals approximately 2.47 acres.

3Where reserves are leased, the data presented above is restricted to include only that material which can be produced over the life of the contractual commitment inherent in the lease; the totals shown pertain only to amounts which are proven and probable. All of the proven and probable reserves are permitted and are quoted in millions of tonnes.

4Years to depletion have been estimated by the Group’s geologists/engineers taking into account historical levels of production and development projects.

5Annualised extraction is quoted in millions of tonnes.

Sources and Availability

of Raw Materials

CRH generally owns or leases the real estate on which its main raw materials, namely aggregates and clay reserves, are found. CRH is a significant purchaser of certain important materials or resources such as cement, liquid bitumen, steel, gas, fuel and other energy supplies, the cost of which can fluctuate significantly and consequently have an adverse impact on CRH’s business. CRH is not generally dependent on any one source for the supply of these materials or resources, other than in certain jurisdictions with regard to the supply of gas and electricity. Competitive markets generally exist in the jurisdictions in which CRH operates for the supply of cement, bitumen, steel and fuel.

28    CRH


Description of the GroupMine Safety Disclosures

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPThe information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is included in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

LOGO

 

CRH      29


LOGO

 

Development Review

2014

Total acquisition and investment activity for 2014 amounted to €188 million on a total of 21 bolt-on transactions which will contribute annualised sales of approximately €182 million, of which €122 million has been reflected in our 2014 results.

Our Heavyside operations in Europe acquired selected readymixed concrete and aggregates assets of Cemex Ireland (including 12 million tonnes of high quality reserves) and a precast concrete business in Denmark. Our Europe Distribution business completed six acquisitions in the Benelux, France and Germany which added a total of nine branches to our network.

Eight bolt-on acquisitions were completed by our Americas Materials Division in 2014 across the United States adding over 230 million tonnes of aggregates reserves. Our Americas Products Division completed five transactions in the Precast, Architectural Products and Construction Accessories businesses.

A total of 16 divestments, together with asset disposals during the year, generated proceeds of €345 million.

In Europe, the disposal of CRH’s 50% equity stake in Denizli Çimento, the Group’s only involvement in the Turkish construction market, was the largest single divestment to complete in 2014, realising proceeds of €170 million. The Heavyside Division also disposed of a number of readymixed concrete and concrete products businesses, while all three European Divisions realised proceeds from the disposal of surplus assets. As most of the divested entities had been equity-accounted by CRH, the impact of these divestments on Group sales is not material.

In the Americas, our Materials Division disposed of several non-core operations across the United States. The Products Division sold five operations in the Precast, Architectural Products and Building Envelope businesses.

Transactions amounting to a further €0.58 billion were signed in 2014. The disposal of the Group’s clay and concrete businesses in the UK and the US closed in the first quarter of 2015.

2013

Total acquisition and investment activity for 2013 amounted to €720 million on a total of 28 bolt-on transactions. Eight transactions were completed by our Europe Heavyside operations, including the acquisition of Cementos Lemona in Spain as part of the asset swap in which we divested our 26% stake in Corporacion Uniland. In September 2013 the Group became the leading cement producer in Ukraine with the acquisition of Mykolaiv Cement in the Lviv region. Two other transactions strengthened our aggregates position in Northern Ireland and expanded our network of cement import facilities in Britain while an acquisition in Belgium established the Group as market leader in the prestressed hollowcore flooring segment. Three acquisitions in the Europe Distribution segment added 13 branches to our network of builders merchants across the Benelux and France. Our joint venture business in India also strengthened its market position in Southern India with the acquisition of Sree Jayajothi Cements in August 2013.

In the Americas, the Materials Division completed 10 bolt-on transactions across its operations in 2013, adding 457 million tonnes of strategically-located aggregates reserves, primarily in the Eastern region of the United States. Our Products business significantly expanded its presence in the high growth region of Western Canada with an acquisition which complements the footprint of our existing North American architectural products business and forms a platform for further bolt-on opportunities. Three other acquisitions in the Products segment strengthened our local market positions. The Distribution business completed three acquisitions adding eight locations to our network.

Proceeds from divestments during 2013, including €144 million relating to the transfer of Uniland, amounted to €283 million.

2012

The €669 million of development activity during 2012 reflected CRH’s long-term, value-based approach to developing the Group’s balanced portfolio. Excluding net deferred payments, total acquisition spend for 2012 amounted to €548 million on a total of 36 bolt-on transactions. Expenditure of €263 million in the first half of 2012 included 18 acquisition and investment initiatives which strengthened our existing market positions and added valuable and well-located aggregates reserves. In the second half of 2012 the Group completed 18 transactions at a total cost of €404 million (€285 million cash spend excluding deferred payments), with the largest transaction being a majority stake in Trap Rock Industries, an integrated aggregates and asphalt business in New Jersey. Total proceeds from completed disposals in 2012 amounted to €784 million. The major disposals were the divestment in May 2012 of our 49% stake in Portuguese cement producer Secil and the sale in April of our wholly-owned Magnetic Autocontrol business.

30      CRH


The Environment and Government Regulations

Introduction

The most important environmental government regulations relevant to CRH as a building materials company are those environmental laws and regulations relevant to our extractive and production processes. In the European Union, operations are subject to national environmental laws and regulations, most of which now emanate from European Union Directives and Regulations. In the United States, operations are subject to Federal and State environmental laws and regulations. In other jurisdictions, national environmental laws apply.

Environmental Compliance Policy

In order to comply with the above suite of environmental regulations, affecting its operations, CRH has developed the following Group environmental policy, approved by the CRH Board and applied across all Group companies, which is to:

 

comply, atas a minimum, with all applicable environmental legislation and continuallycontinuously improve our environmental stewardship, towardsaiming all the time to meet or exceed industry best practice;

 

ensure that our employees and contractors respect their environmental responsibilities;

 

address proactively address the challenges and opportunities of climate change;

 

optimise our use of energy and all resources;

 

promote environmentally-drivenenvironmentally driven product innovation and new business opportunities; and

 

develop positive relationships and strive to be good neighbours in every community in which we operate.

Achieving our environmental policy objectives at all our locations is a management imperative; this line responsibility continues right up to CRH Board level. Daily responsibility for ensuring that the Group’s environmental policy is effectively implemented lies with individual location managers, assisted by a network of Environmental Liaison Officers (“ELOs”). At each year-end, the ELOs assist the Group Sustainability Manager and hissustainability team in carrying out a detailed assessment of Group environmental performance, which is reviewed by the CRH Board.

Addressing Climate Change

CRH recognises that climate change is a major challenge facing humanity and is committed to playing its part in developing practical solutions. CRH is a core member of the Cement Sustainability Initiative (“CSI”) of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (“WBCSD”). The CSI is a voluntary initiative by 22 of the world’s major cement producers, promoting greater sustainability in the cement industry.

In 2007,Having achieved its initial CO2 reduction commitment three years ahead of target in 2012, CRH committed tohas now pledged a 15%25% reduction in its specific net CO2 cement plant emissions by 20152020, compared with theto 1990 specific emissions for the samelevels. The Group is progressing towards achieving this commitment, which covers a defined portfolio of plants. This reduction is on track,Group cement

plants, and is being achieved through major capital investmentconfident that its ongoing strategic programmes will deliver this commitment by the target date.

Through its membership of the CSI of the WBCSD and regional industry associations including the European Cement Association (CEMBUREAU) and the European Lime Association (EuLA) in its cement activities.

Europe and the National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) and the Portland Cement Association (PCA) in the United States, CRH is operating successfullyactively involved in global and regional discussions on the climate change agenda. Relevant facilities in Europe operate within the National Allocation Plans under the European EmissionsEU Emission Trading Scheme for Greenhouse Gas emissions through actively implementing carbon reduction strategies. Through relevant trade associations and the CSI of the WBCSD, CRH is actively engaged in industry initiatives to develop appropriate carbon mitigation strategies post 2012.

CRH has implemented capital expenditure programmes in its cement operations in Europe to reduce carbon emissions in the context of the European Union commitment to reduce Greenhouse Gasgreenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2020. The European Union is committed to increasing this target to 30% should an international agreement be concluded. In addition, the European Union is targeting reductions of 40% by 2030 and suggesting further reductions for 2040 and 2050. Achieving such reductions would represent a significant extra constraint on cement operations in Europe.

CRH    29


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

US Federal and State laws are developing proactively to address carbon emissions. The Group will incur costs in monitoring and reporting emissions. Ultimately a “cap and trade” scheme may be implemented and may impact on the Group’s current cement operation in the US andimplemented; depending on the scope of the legislation, this could significantly impact asphalt operations in the US.United States. As of 236 March 2012,2015, the Group is not aware of any schemes that would materially affect its US operations.

Possible Environmental Liabilities

At 236 March 20122015 there were no material pending legal proceedings relating to environmental regulations or to site remediation which are anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations or liquidity of the Group, nor have internal reviews revealed any situations of likely material future environmental liability to the Group.

Governmental Policies

The overall level of government capital expenditures and the allocation by state entities of available funds to different projects, as well as interest rate and tax policies, directly affect the overall levels of construction activity. The terms and general availability of government permits required to conduct Group business also has an impact on the scope of Group operations. As a result such governmental decisions and policies can have a significant impact on the operating results of the Group.

LOGO

CRH      31


LOGO

Legal Proceedings

Group companies are parties to various legal proceedings, including some in which claims for damages have been asserted against the companies. Having taken appropriate advice, we believe that the aggregate outcome of such proceedings will not have a material effect on the Group’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Details ofregarding the ongoing legal casepending investigation by the Competition Commission in Switzerland involving CRH’s interest in SecilCRH plc’s Swiss subsidiaries BR Bauhandel AG, Gétaz-Miauton SA and Regusci Reco SA are set out in note 232 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 122.185.

Mine Safety Disclosures

The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a)In May 2012 the Group disposed of its 49% investment in its Portuguese joint venture Secil to our former joint venture partner, Semapa (SGPS, S.A.), following the ruling of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street ReformArbitral Tribunal in Paris that the exercise of a call option for the purchase of CRH’s 49% shareholding in Secil by Semapa was valid and Consumer Protection Actboth parties were therefore obligated to complete the sale and purchase of CRH’s share in Secil. As disclosed in our previous Annual Reports, Semapa initiated legal proceedings in November 2011 to appeal against the Tribunal ruling and these proceedings were dismissed by the Cour D’Appel on 10 September 2013. On 12 February 2014, Semapa filed an appeal with the Cour de cassation and this appeal is includedongoing. No provision has been made in exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Seasonality and Weather Patterns

Activityrespect of these proceedings in the construction industry is characterised by cyclicality and is dependent to a significant extent on the seasonal impact of weather in the Group’s operating locations with activity in some markets reduced significantly in winter due to inclement weather. First-half sales accounted for 45% of full-year 2011 (2010: 45%), while EBITDA (as defined)* for the first six months of 2011 represented 35% of the full-year out-turn (2010: 32%).Consolidated Financial Statements.

Research &and Development

Research and development is not a significant focus of CRH’s business.the Group. CRH’s policy is to expense all research and development costs as they occur.

 

Employees

The average number of employees for the past three financial years is disclosed in note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 152. No significant industrial disputes have occurred at any of CRH’s factories or plants during the past five years. The Group believes that relations with its employees and labour unions are satisfactory.

32      CRH


LOGO

CRH      33


LOGO

Strategy Review1

Chief Executive’s Introduction

When I joined CRH in 1998, I quickly learned that a philosophy of business improvement is ingrained in the history of the Group. At CRH, we seek to build better businesses each and every day. As the construction industry emerges from a tumultuous few years, our approach has never been more relevant and there is nowhere I would rather be at this moment in time than in this Group, in this industry, at this point in the business cycle.

2014 was a year of good progress for CRH. We were able to use the underlying strength of our business to capitalise on the recovering markets and deliver a return to profit and margin growth.

This progress was made possible by the hard decisions and hard work undertaken by the Board, management and staff of CRH over the course of the previous seven years since the onset of the global financial crisis. As a result of this, the Group ended 2014 in a position of real strength across our key metrics – strategic, operational and financial.

It is particularly pleasing to report that improvements in performance were achieved last year across all of our Divisions, leading to a double-digit percentage increase in EBITDA (as defined)*.

The year began well in Europe, aided by favourable early-season weather conditions compared with the prolonged winter of the previous year. Conversely, first-half trading in the Americas was impacted by very severe weather conditions for a second consecutive year. However, strengthening economic recovery in the United States drove construction activity as the year progressed and enabled our Americas businesses to perform strongly in the second half, when we began to see an easing of trends in Europe.

Like-for-like sales were ahead by 5% in the first half of the year and rose by 3% in the second, resulting in a full-year increase of 4%. The US Dollar/euro average exchange rate of 1.3290 (2013: 1.3281) was relatively unchanged from prior year. Overall sales of €18.9 billion were achieved, an increase of 5%. EBITDA (as defined)* for the year was €1.641 billion, up 11%.

LOGO

Throughout recent times, the Group has maintained its commitment to ongoing cost control, strong cash generation efficiency and disciplined financial management. Further progress was achieved in these areas in 2014 including an additional €118 million of targeted cost savings delivered by year-end.

The reorganisation of our European businesses was largely completed during the year and we now have an integrated heavyside materials and products organisation that is providing synergies across our operating plant network in European markets.

Development spend in 2014 was €0.19 billion on 21 transactions, a lower spend than in previous years. During 2014 we completed a detailed review of our portfolio and commenced a multi-year divestment programme, of businesses which no longer meet our returns and growth criteria, or for which we believe CRH is no longer the best long-term owner. We remain focussed on optimising our portfolio to meet our financial objectives and prioritising the allocation and reallocation of capital as we reset for growth and restore margins and returns to peak levels.

Portfolio Management is now embedded in our business model as a core competency and a key enabler of value creation within the Group. The discipline of this process encourages optimal capital efficiency and provides new opportunities for investment and acquisition, the drivers of value creation in our business.

On 1 February 2015, the Group announced that it had entered into a binding commitment to acquire certain assets from Lafarge and Holcim for an enterprise value of €6.5 billion. As noted by the Chairman in his review on pages 2 and 3 the transaction is subject to CRH obtaining shareholder approval and certain other conditions. Assuming these conditions are satisfied, we expect the acquisition to complete in mid-2015.

The acquisition involves a portfolio of quality assets with broad geographical and product spread. The businesses represented by these assets have market leading positions and

1See cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements on page 9.
*

Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

34      CRH


cover a range of segments in the building materials sector in both developed and emerging markets. On completion, the acquisition will strengthen our presence in important markets across North America, Western, Central and Eastern Europe in addition to providing new platforms for growth in the Philippines and Brazil. Further details are set out on page 44 and in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Acquiring these businesses represents a compelling opportunity for the Group to employ our proven strategy in a transformative way. Our approach to value creation is straightforward – we deploy capital efficiently, to support vertically integrated businesses, which we then improve with our unrelenting commitment to operational excellence. Through this systematic process, we create significant and sustainable shareholder value. We have followed this model successfully for decades and, we believe that this acquisition will deliver enhanced opportunities to roll out our vertical integration and bolt-on acquisition models.

Throughout the period of recession and downturn in construction activity that followed the global financial crisis, the Group maintained strict financial discipline. This discipline has served us well and has positioned us strongly to avail of the opportunity to acquire these businesses at an attractive valuation and at the right point of the business cycle. Upon completion, CRH will become the third largest building materials company in the world.

Outlook for 2015

In the United States, the pace of GDP growth is expected to pick up in 2015 and we believe that the fundamentals are in place for continued positive momentum in the economy. Demand in the residential construction market continues to expand, albeit at a more moderate rate, while recovery in the non-residential market is starting to gather pace. While the infrastructure market remains broadly stable, there is upside potential due to the growing economy and increased state spending.

In Europe, the general market environment continues to normalise across our main markets. The outlook for 2015 is somewhat mixed, particularly in the first half for which the 2014 comparatives reflect the benefit of very benign weather conditions. In our generally stable markets in Western Europe we expect to see some improvement in overall demand in 2015, particularly in residential activity. While the outlook in Ukraine remains very uncertain, we anticipate that demand will increase in Eastern Europe, driven primarily by an expected pick up in the roads programme in Poland towards the second half of the year.

With the improvements expected in market conditions across our main geographies, together with easing commodity prices, the benefits of cost efficiencies and a favourable foreign exchange translation effect, we expect 2015 to be a further year of progress.

Albert Manifold,Chief Executive

LOGO

CRH         35


LOGO

36        CRH


LOGO

CRH         37


LOGO

CRH Footprint

The Group has good balance across its operations in North America and Western Europe. Our heavyside building materials operations give us exposure to new-build and also to infrastructure repair, maintenance and improvement (RMI) construction. Elsewhere, our lightside and distribution businesses are mainly exposed to residential and non-residential markets, where we also have positions of scale, global brands and potential for growth.

Our strategic priority in these mature markets is to develop our businesses further through a dynamic allocation and reallocation of capital, investment in greenfield projects and

in acquisitions which meet our criteria of achieving vertical integration, and which add to reserves and expand our regional and product positions.

Elsewhere, in developing regions, such as Asia, our entry platforms tend to be in cement. Industrialisation, urbanisation and population growth are key drivers in these markets and CRH targets businesses that have the potential to develop further downstream into integrated building materials businesses as construction markets become more sophisticated.

LOGO

38      CRH


Portfolio Review

In 2014, in light of a vastly changed environment following the global financial crisis and recession of the previous seven years, CRH undertook a comprehensive review of its entire portfolio of businesses to determine which of those businesses offered the most attractive returns and potential for growth in the emerging new cycle. Following this review, a multi-year divestment programme has been initiated for up to €1.5 billion - €2 billion of assets. Portfolio Management is now an intrinsic part of the Group’s strategy and value creation model, which is outlined in the next section.

CRH’s vision is

to be the leading
building materials
business in the
world

 

LOGO

LOGO

CRH      39


LOGO

At the core of the
CRH mission is a
commitment to create
value and deliver
best-in-class returns
for all stakeholders,
consistently and
sustainably

The CRH Business Model

CRH’s business model has played an instrumental role in the consistent delivery by the Group of industry leading return on invested capital through the cycle. In the period 1970 – 2014, CRH has, in euro terms, delivered a formidable compound annual Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 15.7%.

At the heart of this enduring performance is our long standing and relentless commitment to our value creation model, which is delivered by an international team of dedicated people.

The five elements of the model are:

A Balanced Portfolio

A Unique Acquisition Model

A Focus on Building Better Businesses

Dynamic Portfolio Management

Financial Strength

LOGO

40      CRH


Balanced Portfolio

Building a balanced portfolio is a core constituent of our philosophy and a key determinant of value creation for CRH. The Group is a broad-based building materials business that is diversified with many products, geographies and sector end-uses. We are a multi-product company and the breadth and depth of our product range differentiates our positioning relative to peers in the industry.

Maintaining a balanced portfolio enables the Group to take advantage of differing demand cycles across our businesses. Diversification also opens up a greater number of opportunities for acquisitions, while having vertically integrated businesses creates potential for synergies and operational leverage.

Acquisition Model

Each year, the Group’s balanced portfolio grows, primarily by way of acquisition. For over four decades, CRH has successfully employed its unique acquisition model with a focus on adding small to mid-sized companies that complement and add value to our existing portfolio. On occasion, larger and/or step-change acquisitions are made when the value proposition and strategic rationale are compelling. Details of a proposed major acquisition in 2015 are set out on page 44 and in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Many of our core end markets in mature economies remain fragmented or relatively unconsolidated and will continue to offer growth opportunities via our proven acquisition model in the decades ahead.

Our acquisition model for creating new value and growth platforms also offers considerable long-term potential in developing economies, in particular those in Asia, where the Group is currently building select leading regional positions.

LOGO

LOGO

CRH      41


LOGO

Building Better Businesses

Building Better Businesses is a core CRH competency. With over 3,300 operating locations in 34 countries worldwide, the potential for value creation is significant.

Through the extraction of inherent value in newly acquired businesses, and a focus on delivering organic performance improvement in existing businesses, our commitment to Building Better Businesses is a key component of the CRH value creation model.

Every day we strive to make improvements. Attention to detail by our 76,000 strong team, together with the multiplier effect of businesses involving millions of tonnes of aggregates, asphalt and cement, and millions of units of construction accessories and distribution stock keeping units, has a material and cumulative impact over time.

By leveraging the scale of the Group, benefits accrue in the areas of procurement, merchandising, selling prices, category management, distribution and IT. Through the sharing of knowledge, ongoing people development, optimisation of our networks, operational leverage and utilisation of the Group’s

financial strength, we can deliver greater value from these businesses.

CRH’s operations benefit from an active philosophy of continuous improvement. The Group provides guidance, support, functional expertise and control in the areas of performance measurement, financial reporting, cash management, strategic planning, business development, talent management, governance and compliance, risk management, sustainability, health & safety and environment.

Portfolio Management

Through the past number of very difficult years for the global construction industry, CRH has worked hard to position itself to maximise the opportunities presented by the coming growth cycle.

An objective of the ongoing Portfolio Management process is to create a narrower and deeper suite of businesses that are positioned either by virtue of size, product mix, location or

LOGO

42      CRH


operational expertise to benefit most from improvements in demand activity and pricing in their respective markets.

The impact of Portfolio Management on value creation is twofold: capital will be continuously released from low growth areas and reallocated to core businesses for growth, while balance sheet capacity will be enhanced to boost acquisition capabilities.

Financial Strength

Maintaining a position of financial strength is a cornerstone of the CRH business model and the Group adopts a rigorous commitment to financial discipline, strong cash generation and retaining balance sheet capacity.

Financial strength enables the Group to create value in two key ways: to provide the resources to fund value enhancing investments and long-term growth; and to reduce the cost of capital which ultimately translates into higher margins and profitability.

The combination of two key financial measures – robust cash generation and solid interest cover – support the investment grade credit ratings CRH enjoys. These ratings enable the Group to gain access to multiple sources of funding.

In recent times, our financial discipline has enabled the Group to secure lower and more diversified long-term interest rates on our debt, which will reduce the Group’s average interest rate from above 5% in 2012 to circa 3% from 2018 onwards.

Financial strength is a fundamental tenet of the business and has given CRH the capacity to increase or maintain the dividend payment to shareholders in each of the last 31 years.

The Shelly Company’s Smith Concrete supplied and delivered 14,715 m3 of concrete and over 45,000 tonnes of aggregates to the Zanesville, Ohio, Genesis Healthcare 2014 expansion project. Smith Concrete’s 4-H-themed readymix truck promotes the largest youth development organisation in the United States.

LOGO

LOGO

CRH      43


LOGO

Proposed Acquisition – Announced February 2015

Definitions:the following definitions apply throughout this Annual Report on Form-20-F, unless the context otherwise requires:

“NewCo Group”:the collection of newly incorporated or pre-existing subsidiaries of the Sellers which hold the assets for sale pursuant to the proposed Acquisition.

“proposed Acquisition”:the acquisition by CRH of the NewCo Group.

“Combined Group”:the CRH Group and the NewCo Group.

“Sellers”:Lafarge and Holcim.

On 7 April 2014, Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd announced their intention to merge their businesses. In order to obtain the regulatory clearances necessary to complete the Merger, they agreed to divest certain of their businesses. The assets for sale are held by newly incorporated or pre-existing subsidiaries of the Sellers, collectively referred to as the NewCo Group.

As outlined in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, CRH announced on 1 February 2015 that it had entered into a Binding Offer Letter and Philippines SPA dated 31 January 2015 in which it has made a binding irrevocable offer to acquire the NewCo Group for an enterprise value of €6.5 billion. The cash consideration will be paid in a combination of euro, Sterling and Canadian Dollars.

The proposed Acquisition is subject to: (i) CRH shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held on 19 March 2015; (ii) the successful completion of the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim; and (iii) the completion of certain local reorganisations by Lafarge and Holcim in advance of the proposed Acquisition.

A Circular has been distributed to shareholders to seek their approval of the proposed Acquisition and is available on the CRH website, www.crh.com1.

Information on the NewCo Group

The NewCo Group comprises a global portfolio of assets in the buildings materials industry. It is a global producer of cement, aggregates, ready-mix and related construction activities across four regional platforms in North America, Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe and Emerging Markets. In 2013 the NewCo Group produced 23mt of cement, 79mt of aggregates, 8mt of asphalt and 10m m³ of ready-mix concrete. Approximately two-thirds of the NewCo Group’s revenue is generated in the European region. Outside Europe, Canada is the largest country in terms of estimated revenue for 2014.

The NewCo Group has market-leading positions and covers all segments of the building materials sector in developed, transition and emerging markets. It operates 24 integrated cement plants together with 10 grinding stations for a total capacity of approximately 36mt per annum. The NewCo Group has assets and approximately 15,000 employees across 11 countries:

Canada and the United States;

Western Europe: the UK, Germany, France and La Réunion;

Central and Eastern Europe: Slovakia, Serbia, Hungary and Romania; and

Emerging Markets: the Philippines and Brazil.

Reasons for the proposed Acquisition

The NewCo Group represents high quality assets which are core strategic parts of both Lafarge’s and Holcim’s global portfolios. CRH believes the proposed Acquisition provides a compelling strategic fit for the Group for a number of reasons including:

The NewCo Group represents a geographically diversified portfolio with leading market positions and provides a strong strategic fit across four strong growth platforms.

The NewCo Group is highly complementary to CRH’s existing footprint and the NewCo Group integrates well with CRH’s existing network in North America, across Europe and in Asia.

The proposed Acquisition is being executed at the right time and at an attractive valuation and the cost of funds for the Group is at an all-time-low.

The NewCo Group is expected to deliver attractive financial returns, with additional value expected from the Combined Group in annual synergies from cost savings and operational efficiency improvements with the programme expected to be implemented in the first three years of ownership.

CRH will launch procurement programmes across the NewCo Group leveraging the procurement systems and expertise of both CRH and the NewCo Group.

The combination of technical services will improve operational performance. The integration of the NewCo Group into existing CRH structures in place in North America, Europe and Asia will allow for rationalisation of administration and optimisation of manning levels.

The proposed Acquisition provides the opportunity to re-allocate capital at attractive multiples in recovering regions.

Balance sheet strength remains a key focus for the Group. CRH remains strongly committed to investment grade credit ratings. Following CRH’s announcement confirming discussions were taking place with Lafarge and Holcim and the announcement, on 2 February 2015, of the proposed Acquisition, Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services and Moody’s Investors Service affirmed their pre-announcement investment grade ratings and their outlooks remain stable. Fitch Ratings put CRH’s pre-announcement ratings on Rating Watch Negative (changed from Negative Outlook).

1 Information on or accessible through our website such as the Circular does not form part of this document.

44      CRH


CRH has a strategy of active portfolio management which will continue post acquisition of the NewCo Group. CRH is exploring options to involve partners for certain of the assets acquired to meet local regulatory requirements or our strategic objectives, though we have not entered into any such agreement concerning the assets of the NewCo Group as of 11 March 2015.

Principal terms and conditions of the proposed Acquisition

The CRH Group has (i) made a binding irrevocable offer to acquire the NewCo Group (excluding the Philippines business), and (ii) entered into the Philippines SPA to acquire the Philippines business.

Lafarge and Holcim may elect to accept the offer and have full discretion whether to do so. The offer will remain open for acceptance until the earlier of (a) two weeks following the conclusion of the works council consultation process and (b) 31 August 2015. If the Sellers accept the offer, the proposed share purchase agreement to be entered into between the parties will come into effect. This proposed agreement (the “Global SPA”) is conditional on:

Approval of the proposed Acquisition by CRH’s shareholders at the EGM to be convened for that purpose;

Successful completion of the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim; and

Completion of certain local reorganisations by Lafarge and Holcim in advance of the proposed Acquisition.

The long stop date for the Global SPA is the earlier of (a) three months following completion of the merger between Lafarge and Holcim and (b) 31 December 2015 but in any case no earlier than 31 August 2015. The Global SPA provides for the payment of a termination fee by either side in certain circumstances as described in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRH has committed to the Sellers to do all things necessary to obtain regulatory approvals required for certain parts of the NewCo Group. If certain approvals are not obtained by the long stop date, then the proposed Acquisition will proceed to completion in all jurisdictions other than those where regulatory approval has not been obtained and a divestiture trustee will be appointed to sell the businesses in those jurisdictions. Any loss or profit on such sale will be for the account of CRH.

The CRH Group has agreed to acquire the NewCo Group on a cash-free, debt-free basis, with normalised levels of working capital. The agreement contains customary warranties, including compliance with law, antitrust, environmental matters, litigation, tax and material contracts. It also indemnifies the CRH Group against any pre-closing tax liabilities subject to certain exclusions and limitations.

CRH has agreed that, for a period of not less than one year from closing of the agreement between the parties, it will maintain NewCo Group employee benefits on at least as favourable terms to the current terms, to not close a plant in that period, and not to engage in any collective redundancy programme or mass lay-off.

Where CRH disposes of any business within the NewCo Group within 18 months of closing of the agreement, it has agreed to share any profit on disposal equally with Lafarge and Holcim.

The Philippines SPA is a put and call options agreement dated 31 January 2015 between CRH International, CRH plc, Lafarge Holdings (Philippines) Inc., Calumboyan Holdings, Inc., Southwestern Cement Ventures, Inc., and Round Royal Inc. for the sale and purchase of the Philippines business being sold in connection with the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim. It is conditional on CRH entering into arrangements with a local partner in the Philippines so as to comply with the laws of the Philippines in relation to restrictions on foreign ownership of certain Philippine assets and if a local partner is not found on or before 15 August 2015, the assets will be sold with any profit on disposal split equally between CRH and the sellers under the Philippines SPA but any loss for the account of CRH. The Philippines SPA contains conditions to closing which are consistent with the conditions in the Global SPA and is also conditional upon completion of the Global SPA.

Financing

CRH proposes to finance the proposed Acquisition through existing cash resources, new bank facilities and the proceeds of a placing of new Ordinary Shares in CRH plc. The drawn amount of the loan facilities shall bear interest at the rate of EURIBOR plus a margin, which is subject to certain step-ups according to a time and credit ratings based schedule. The facilities consist of a €0.4 billion tranche with a maturity date of 31 December 2015, a €1.5 billion tranche with a maturity date of 30 June 2016, and a €1.0 billion tranche with a maturity date of 30 June 2018. Further details of the placing and the loan facilities are set out in note 33 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Dividend policy of the Combined Group

CRH has a strong dividend track record, being one of the few companies within the sector to have maintained its dividend throughout the downturn. Following completion of the proposed Acquisition, the dividend will remain a key focus for CRH. In this regard, while each dividend decision is made based on current trading and expectations regarding future performance, the Board anticipates that the proposed Acquisition will result in significant earnings accretion and enhanced cash generation for the Combined Group.

LOGO

CRH      45


LOGO

46        CRH


Description of the GroupLOGO

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUPCRH         47


LOGO

Environment & Climate Change

 

With a global base, CRH recognises the part it can play in improving the sustainability of the built environment. CRH is committed to the highest standards of environmental management and to addressing proactively the challenges and opportunities of climate change.

The Group implements programmes across its worldwide operations to promote energy and resource efficiency, achieve targeted air emission reductions, enhance biodiversity, restore worked-out quarries and, in addition, realise environmentally driven product and process innovation and new business opportunities.

In 2012, three years ahead of the target date, CRH achieved its commitment to reduce specific net carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from cement plants by 15% on 1990 levels. CRH is now on track to achieving its 2020 commitment to a 25% reduction in specific net CO2 cement plant emissions on 1990 levels.

Further progress was made in 2014. CRH continued to increase sales of lower carbon products such as warm-mix asphalt, which now accounts for approximately 40% of CRH’s US asphalt sales. In Europe, CRH provides low carbon cement for sustainable construction and approximately one third of CRH’s cement plant fuel requirements are met by alternative fuels, generating cost benefits in addition to carbon savings.

As well as being recyclable themselves, many CRH products incorporate significant quantities of recycled and other alternative materials. In 2014, the Group used 19 million tonnes of externally sourced alternative materials to replace raw materials, including recycled asphalt pavement and shingles which together provide a fifth of asphalt requirements in US operations.

 

LOGO

48      CRH


People & Community

CRH believes that continued sustainable business success is built on maintaining excellent relationships with all stakeholders.

The Group is committed to fostering respect in the workplace and to developing an inclusive workforce based on merit and ability. Good people are at the heart of all successful organisations. It is a guiding Group philosophy to develop and nurture all employees, to provide training and skills learning, offering strong career paths and upskilling opportunities.

The Group endorses human and labour rights and supports the principles set out in the articles of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labour Organisation’s Core Labour Principles. CRH operates a comprehensive Code of Business Conduct and has additionally implemented an Ethical Procurement Code and Supplier Code of Conduct.

The building materials industry traditionally attracts more male than female employees. In 2014, 18% of CRH’s employees were female. At Board level, CRH has three female directors including the Finance Director. Following the Annual General Meeting 25% of the CRH Board will be female.

CRH also recognises a wider responsibility beyond core business activities in the communities in which Group companies operate. It is Group policy to actively support and engage with our neighbours. In 2014, Group companies hosted over 600 stakeholder engagement events.

CRH assists local neighbourhood and community initiatives, in addition to supporting programmes in education, environmental protection and job creation. For example, during 2014, CRH’s US subsidiary, Oldcastle, continued in its national partnership with Habitat for Humanity and also continues to support the Wildlife Habitat Council.

LOGO

LOGO

CRH      49


LOGO

Delivering Best-in-Class Governance

CRH is committed to adopting and maintaining best-in-class governance, which is a hallmark of successful organisations and businesses. At CRH, our values based approach to building and running a global business places an emphasis on respect for the law and an unrelenting commitment to compliance with the highest standards of business ethics.

CRH adopts an open and transparent environment in the workplace and we have developed an internal principle of conduct for all employees that there is ‘never a good reason to do the wrong thing’. Within this environment, we also foster a ‘speak up’ culture to empower and encourage participation among employees.

CRH’s Compliance & Ethics teams implement a Code of Business Conduct programme and work to ensure its

success. The Code of Business Conduct sets out policies and guidelines, training, and monitoring and review mechanisms.

In the current training cycle a further 32,000 employees participated in Code of Business Conduct training. A further 11,000 also undertook advanced instruction on changing regulatory environments, anti-bribery rules, competition law and other relevant areas such as corruption and fraud.

Further information is provided in the Corporate Governance section of this report on page 106.

LOGO

50      CRH


Managing Risk

Managing risk is an area of vital importance to CRH and the Group has adopted a formal Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework as a basis for assessing and mitigating risks associated with our range of businesses and corporate decisions.

The Group adopts the best international practice of incorporating the ‘three lines of defence’ structure into our corporate risk management: (i) local management,
(ii) divisional and corporate oversight, and (iii) the internal audit function.

The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group are outlined on pages 52 to 63 and are reported to the Audit Committee on a biannual basis.

Performance Reporting

CRH has formal structures in place to identify, evaluate and manage potential risks and opportunities in sustainability areas. Group performance in this regard, together with the effectiveness of actions, is reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors. CRH is committed to reporting on the breadth of its sustainability performance in a comprehensive and transparent manner and to publishing performance indicators and ambitions in key identified sustainability areas.

Oldcastle Precast provided Storm Capture® as a solution for the underground stormwater detention system at the new administration building site at Quantico National Cemetery, in Virginia – a military cemetery for veterans of the United States Armed Forces.

LOGO

LOGO

CRH      51


LOGO

Risk Factors

This section describes the principal risks and uncertainties that could affect the Group’s (and if the proposed Acquisition (see page 44) is completed, the Combined Group’s) business. The risks and uncertainties listed below should be considered in connection with any forward-looking statements in this Form 20-F and the cautionary statements contained in the section “Introduction and Performance Indicators -Measures – Forward-Looking Statements”.

A. Economic, The Risk Factors have been grouped to focus on key strategic risks and operational risks

CRH operates in cyclical industries which are influenced by globalkey financial and national economic circumstances and the level of construction activity. Severe weather can reduce construction activity and lead to a decrease in demand for the Group’s products in areas affected by adverse weather conditions. The Group’s financial performance may also be negatively impacted by declines in governmental funding programmes (largely for infrastructure), unfavourable swings in fuel and other commodity/raw material prices and by lowered sovereign creditworthiness and related austerity measures. The adequacy and timeliness of management response to unfavourable events is critical.reporting risks.

The Group’s operating and financial performance is influenced by general economic conditions and the state of the residential, industrial and commercial and infrastructural construction markets in the countries in which it operates, particularly the European Union and North America.

The deterioration in Eurozone financial markets has contributed to global economic uncertainty. Whilst various actions have been taken by the European Commission, the European Central Bank, the International Monetary Fund and other parties to address the likely effects on the real economies of the participant countries and others, the success of these endeavours cannot be guaranteed.

In general, economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in construction activity leading to postponement in orders. Construction markets are cyclical and are affected by many factors that are beyond the Group’s control, including:

the price of fuel and principal energy-related raw materials such as bitumen and steel (which in 2011, accounted for approximately 9% of annual Group sales revenues);

the performance of national economies in the 36 countries in which CRH operates;

monetary policies in the countries in which CRH operates - for example, an increase in interest rates typically reduces the volume of mortgage borrowings thus impacting residential construction activity;

the allocation of government funding for public infrastructure programmes, such as the development of highways in the United States under the “Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users”; and

the level of demand for construction materials and services with sustained adverse weather conditions leading to potential disruptions or curtailments in outdoor construction activity.

A continuation of or deterioration in the current strained global economic conditions may result in further general reductions in construction activity (e.g. further austerity measures being contemplated in the Eurozone and the United States). Against this backdrop, the adequacy and timeliness of the actions taken by CRH’s management team are of critical importance in delivering financial performance.

Each of the above factors could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s operating results and the market price of CRH’s securities.

As an international business, CRH operates in many countries with differing, and in some cases potentially fast-changing, economic, social and political conditions. Changes in these conditions or in the governmental and regulatory requirements in any of the countries in which CRH operates, and in particular in developing markets, may adversely affect CRH’s business thus leading to possible impairment of financial performance and/or restrictions on future growth opportunities amongst other matters.

CRH    31


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

CRH operates mainly in western Europe and North America as well as, to a lesser degree, in developing countries/emerging markets in eastern Europe, South America, Turkey, China and India. The economies of these countries are at diverse stages of socioeconomic and macroeconomic development which could give rise to a number of risks, uncertainties and challenges; these would include the following:

changes in political, social or economic conditions;

trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;

potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

labour practices and differing labour regulations;

ethical procurement;

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and

state-imposed restrictions on repatriation of funds.

CRH faces strong volume and price competition across its activities. Given the commodity nature of many of its products, market share, and thus financial performance, will decline if CRH fails to compete successfully.

The competitive environment in which the Group operates can be significantly impacted by general economic conditions in combination with local factors including the number of competitors, the degree of utilisation of production capacity and the specifics of product demand. Across the multitude of largely local markets in which the Group conducts business, downward pricing pressure is experienced from time to time and the Group may not always be in a position to recover increased operating expenses (caused by factors such as increased fuel and raw material prices) through higher selling prices.

Existing products may be replaced by substitute products which CRH does not produce or distribute leading to losses in market share and constraints on financial performance.

A number of the products sold by CRH (both those manufactured internally and those distributed) compete with other building products that do not feature in CRH’s product range. Any significant replacement of the Group’s products by substitute products, which CRH does not produce or distribute, could adversely impact market share and results of operations in these markets.

Growth through acquisition is a key element of CRH’s strategy. CRH may not be able to continue to grow as contemplated in its business plan if it is unable to identify attractive targets, execute full and proper due diligence, raise funds on acceptable terms, complete such acquisition transactions, integrate the operations of the acquired businesses and realise anticipated levels of profitability and cash flows.

The Group’s acquisition strategy focuses on value-enhancing mid-sized acquisitions supplemented from time to time by larger strategic acquisitions into new markets or new building products, for example. As a result of the challenging trading backdrop to many of CRH’s businesses since onset of the financial crisis and the ensuing global economic downturn, management’s focus continues to be limited to acquisition opportunities that offer compelling value and exceptional strategic fit.

The realisation of CRH’s acquisition strategy is dependent on the ability to identify and acquire suitable assets at appropriate prices thus satisfying the stringent cash flow and return on investment criteria underpinning such activity. CRH may not be able to identify such companies, and, even if identified, may not be able to acquire them given a variety of factors including the outcome of due diligence processes, the ability to raise funds (as required) on acceptable terms, the need for competition authority approval in certain instances and competition for transactions from peers and other entities exploring acquisition opportunities in the building materials sector. The Group’s ability to realise the expected benefits from

32    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

acquisition activity depends, in large part, on its ability to integrate newly-acquired businesses in a timely and effective manner. Even if CRH is able to acquire suitable companies, it still may not be able to incorporate them successfully into its legacy business and, accordingly, may be deprived of the expected benefits thus leading to potential dissipation and diversion of Group management resources.

CRH does not have a controlling interest in certain of the businesses (i.e. associates and joint ventures) in which it has invested and may invest; these arrangements may require greater management of more complex business partner relationships. In addition, CRH is subject to various restrictions as a result of non-controlling interests in certain of its subsidiaries.

Given the absence of control in associates and, to a lesser extent, joint ventures, important decisions such as the approval of business plans and the timing and amount of cash distributions and capital expenditure, for example, may require the consent of CRH’s partners or may be approved without CRH’s consent (despite provisions in the purchase contract). These limitations could impair CRH’s ability to effectively manage and/or realise its strategic goals for these businesses.

The majority of CRH’s subsidiaries are wholly-owned with non-controlling interests (i.e. minority shareholders) accounting for an immaterial share of total equity. Various disadvantages may result from the participation of non-controlling interests whose objectives and concerns may not always align with those of CRH. The presence of non-controlling interests may, among other things, impede CRH’s ability to implement organisational efficiencies, transfer cash from one subsidiary to another and allocate assets in the most effective manner.

Given the decentralised structure of CRH, existing processes to recruit, develop and retain talented individuals and promote their mobility may be inadequate thus giving rise to difficulties in succession planning and potentially impeding the continued realisation of the Group’s core strategy of performance and growth.

The identification and subsequent assessment, management, development and deployment of talented individuals is of major importance in continuing to deliver on CRH’s core strategy of performance and growth and in ensuring that succession planning objectives for key executive roles throughout CRH’s international operations are satisfied. In recognition of these requirements, the human resource management framework focuses on the operation of integrated and targeted programmes of performance management, leadership development (including international assignments, where appropriate), coaching and mentoring inter alia; the appropriateness of these programmes is reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that they mirror best practices.

B. Financial and reporting risks

CRH uses financial instruments throughout its businesses giving rise to interest rate, foreign currency, credit/counterparty and liquidity risks. A downgrade of CRH’s credit ratings may give rise to increases in funding costs in respect of future debt and may impair the Group’s ability to raise funds on acceptable terms. In addition, against the backdrop of the heightened uncertainties, in particular in the Eurozone, insolvency of the financial institutions with which CRH conducts business (or a downgrade in their credit ratings) may lead to losses in CRH’s liquid investments, derivative assets and cash and cash equivalents balances or render it more difficult either to utilise the Group’s existing debt capacity or otherwise obtain financing for the Group’s operations.

CRH has incurred and will continue to incur significant amounts of debt in order to finance its business and ongoing acquisition programme. As at 31 December 2011, CRH had outstanding net indebtedness of approximately3.5 billion (2010:3.5 billion). A significant portion of the cash generated from operational activity is dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness and is not available for other purposes. If CRH’s earnings were to decline significantly, difficulties may be experienced in servicing its debt instruments. In addition, in raising debt, CRH has entered into certain financing agreements containing restrictive covenants requiring CRH to maintain a certain minimum interest cover ratio and a certain

CRH    33


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

minimum net worth and placing a maximum limit on the ratio of net debt to net worth. These restrictions may limit CRH’s flexibility in planning for and reacting to competitive pressures and changes in business, industry and general economic conditions and may limit its ability to undertake acquisition activity and capitalise on other business opportunities. For further information on financial covenants, please see the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the Business Review (page 43).

CRH is exposed to movements in interest rates which affect the amount of interest paid on floating rate borrowings and the return generated on its cash investments. As at 31 December 2011, 70% (2010: 75%) of CRH’s net debt was at fixed interest rates. For additional information on the value of debt and the impact of movements in interest rates, see notes 21 and 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Any material deterioration in CRH’s existing credit ratings may significantly reduce its access to the debt markets and result in increased interest rates on future debt. A downgrade in CRH’s credit ratings may result from factors specific to CRH or from other factors such as general economic weakness or sovereign credit rating ceilings.

CRH holds significant cash balances on deposit with a variety of highly-rated financial institutions (typically invested on a short-term basis) which, together with liquid investments and cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 2011, totalled1.3 billion (2010:1.8 billion). In addition to the above, CRH enters into derivative transactions with a variety of highly-rated financial institutions giving rise to derivative assets and derivative liabilities; the relevant balances as at 31 December 2011 were205 million and30 million respectively (2010:208 million and87 million). The counterparty risks inherent in these exposures may give rise to losses in the event that the relevant financial institutions suffer a ratings downgrade or become insolvent. In addition, certain of the Group’s activities (e.g. highway paving in the United States) give rise to significant amounts receivable from counterparties at the balance sheet date; at year-end 2011, this balance was0.4 billion (2010:0.4 billion). In the current business environment, there is increased exposure to counterparty default, particularly as regards bad debts.

CRH operates a number of defined benefit pension schemes in certain of its operating jurisdictions. The assets and liabilities of these schemes may exhibit significant period-on-period volatility attributable primarily to asset valuations, changes in bond yields and longevity. In addition to future service contributions, significant cash contributions may be required to remediate past service deficits.

The assumptions used in the recognition of assets, liabilities, income and expenses (including discount rates, expected return on plan assets, rate of increase in future compensation levels, mortality rates and healthcare cost trend rates) are updated annually based on market and economic conditions at the balance sheet date and for any relevant changes to the terms and conditions of the pension and post-retirement plans. These assumptions can be affected by (i) for the discount rate, changes in the rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments; (ii) for the expected return on plan assets, changes in the pension plans’ strategic asset allocations to various investment types or to long-term return trend rates in the capital markets in which the pension fund assets are invested; (iii) for future compensation levels, future labour market conditions and anticipated inflation; (iv) for mortality rates, changes in the relevant actuarial funding valuations or changes in best practice; and (v) for healthcare cost trend rates, the rate of medical cost inflation in the relevant regions (items (i) and (iii) to (v) pertain to liabilities with item (ii) pertaining to assets). The weighted average actuarial assumptions used and sensitivity analysis in relation to the discount rates employed in the determination of pension and other post-retirement liabilities and the expected long-term rate of return on scheme assets are discloseddefinitions set out on page 156. A prolonged period of financial market instability would have an adverse impact on the valuations of CRH’s pension scheme assets.

In addition, a number of the defined benefit pension schemes in operation44 apply throughout the Group have reported material funding deficits thus necessitating reparation either in accordance with legislative requirements or as agreed with the relevant regulators. These obligations are reflected in the employer contributions disclosure on page 161. The extent of such contributions may be exacerbated over time as a result of a prolonged period of instability in worldwide financial markets.

34    CRH


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

In its worldwide insurance programme, the Group carries appropriate levels of insurance for typical business risks (including product liability) with various leading insurance companies. However, in the event of the failure of one or more of its insurance counterparties, the Group could be impacted by losses where recovery from such counterparties is not possible.

The Group’s insurance arrangements retain certain exposures in respect of a variety of liability/casualty insurances and property damage and business interruption insurance; amounts in excess of these predetermined self-insurance thresholds, together with umbrella arrangements, as appropriate, are arranged through leading, highly-rated global insurers and re-insurers giving rise to counterparty risks. The exposures borne by third-parties are, in general, subject to caps with any exposures in excess of those caps being borne by CRH. As at 31 December 2011, the total insurance provision, which is subject to periodic actuarial valuation and is discounted, amounted to199 million (2010:207 million); a substantial proportion of this figure pertained to claims which are classified as “incurred but not reported”.

CRH’s activities are conducted primarily in the local currency of the country of operation resulting in low levels of foreign currency transactional risk. The principal foreign exchange risks to which the Consolidated Financial Statements are exposed pertain to adverse movements in reported results when translated into euro (which is the Group’s functional and reporting currency) together with declines in the euro value of the Group’s net investments which are denominated in a wide basket of currencies other than the euro.

A significant proportion of the Group’s revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the euro, principally US Dollars, Swiss Francs, Polish Zlotys and Pounds Sterling. From year to year, adverse changes in the exchange rates used to translate these and other foreign currencies into euro have impacted and will continue to impact the Group’s consolidated results and net worth. It is the Group’s policy to hedge partially its investment in foreign currencies by ensuringRisk Factors that net worth, net debt and net interest are spread across the currencies in which the Group operates, but otherwise CRH does not generally engage in hedging transactions to reduce Group exposure to foreign exchange translation risk. For additional information on the impact of foreign exchange movements on the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011, see the Business Review section commencing on page 39 and notes 21 and 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Significant under-performance in any of CRH’s major cash-generating units may give rise to a material write-down of goodwill which would have a substantial impact on the Group’s income and equity.

An acquisition generates goodwill to the extent that the price paid by CRH exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired. Under IFRS, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortised but are subject to annual impairment testing. Other intangible assets deemed separable from goodwill arising on acquisitions are amortised. A detailed discussion of the impairment testing process, the key assumptions used, the results of that testing and the related sensitivity analysis is contained in note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 135 and 136.

Whilst a goodwill impairment charge would not impact cash flow, a full write-down at 31 December 2011 would have resulted in a charge to income and a reduction in equity of4.3 billion (2010:4.1 billion).

C. Compliance and regulatory risks

CRH is subject to stringent and evolving laws, regulations, standards and best practices in the area of Corporate Social Responsibility (comprising corporate governance, environmental management and climate change (specifically capping of emissions), health and safety management and social performance) which may give rise to increased ongoing remediation and/or other compliance costs and may adversely affect the Group’s reported results and financial condition.

CRH is subject to a broad and increasingly stringent range of existing and evolving governance, environmental, health and safety and other laws, regulations, standards and best practices in each of the

CRH    35


Description of the Group

DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP

jurisdictions in which the Group operates giving rise to significant compliance costs, potential legal liability exposure and potential limitations on the development of the Group’s operations. These laws, regulations, standards and best practices relate to, amongst other things, climate change, noise, emissions to air, water and soil, the use and handling of hazardous materials and waste disposal practices. Given the above, the risk of increased environmental and other compliance costs and unplanned capital expenditure is inherent in CRH’s business and the impact of future developments in these respects on the Group’s activities, products, operations, profitability and cash flow cannot be estimated; there can therefore be no assurance that material liabilities and costs will not be incurred in the future.

Environmental and health and safety and other laws, regulations and standards may expose CRH to the risk of substantial costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with assets that have been sold and activities that have been discontinued. In addition, many of CRH’s manufacturing sites have a history of industrial use and, while CRH applies strict environmental operating standards and undertakes extensive environmental due diligence in relation to acquisitions, some soil and groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at a limited number of sites; the associated remediation costs incurred to date have not been material. Despite CRH’s policy and efforts to comply with all applicable environmental laws, CRH may face remediation liabilities and legal proceedings concerning environmental matters.

Based on information currently available, CRH has budgeted capital and revenue expenditures for environmental improvement projects and has established reserves for known environmental remediation liabilities that are probable and reasonably capable of estimation. These figures are not material infollow, unless the context of CRH. However, CRH cannot predict environmental matters with certainty, and budgeted amounts and established reserves may not be adequate for all purposes. In addition, the development or discovery of new facts, events, circumstances or conditions, including future decisions to close plants, which may trigger remediation liabilities, and other developments such as changes in law or increasingly strict enforcement by governmental authorities, could result in increased costs and liabilities or prevent or restrict some of the Group’s operations, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on CRH’s reputation, business, results of operations and overall financial condition.otherwise requires.

For additional information, see The Environment and Government Regulations section on pages 29 and 30.

CRH is subject to many laws and regulations (both local and international) throughout the many jurisdictions in which it operates and is thus exposed to changes in those laws and regulations and to the outcome of any investigations conducted by governmental, international and other regulatory authorities, which may result in the imposition of fines and/or sanctions for non-compliance.

CRH is subject to various statutes, regulations and laws applicable to businesses generally in the countries and markets in which it operates. These include statutes, regulations and laws affecting land usage, zoning, labour and employment practices, competition, financial reporting, taxation, anti-bribery, anti-corruption, governance and other matters. CRH mandates that its employees comply with its Code of Business Conduct which stipulates best practice in relation to regulatory matters; however, CRH cannot guarantee that its operating units will at all times be successful in complying with all demands of regulatory agencies in a manner which will not materially adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.

36    CRH


BUSINESS REVIEW

 

Key Strategic Risk Factors
Industry cyclicality
Risk FactorDiscussion
The level of construction activity in local and national markets is inherently cyclical being influenced by a wide variety of factors including global and national economic circumstances, ongoing austerity programmes in the developed world, governments’ ability to fund infrastructure projects, consumer sentiment and weather conditions. Financial performance may also be negatively impacted by unfavourable swings in fuel and other commodity/raw material prices. Failure of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group to respond on a timely basis and/or adequately to unfavourable events beyond the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s control will adversely affect financial performance.

The CRH Group’s operating and financial performance is, and the Combined Group’s would be, influenced by general economic conditions and the state of the residential, industrial and commercial and infrastructure construction markets in the countries in which it operates, particularly in Europe and North America. Closing of the proposed Acquisition will extend or expand the geographic scope of the CRH Group’s existing heavyside activities in France & La Reunion, Germany, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Serbia, Romania, Slovakia, the United States, Canada, Brazil and the Philippines.

In general, economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in construction activity leading to postponement in orders. Construction markets are inherently cyclical and are affected by many factors that are beyond the CRH Group’s control, including:

the price of fuel and principal energy-related raw materials such as bitumen and steel (which accounted for approximately 9% of annual Group sales revenues in 2014);

the performance of the national economies in the 34 countries in which the CRH Group operates (37 for the Combined Group);

monetary policies in the countries in which the CRH Group operates — for example, an increase in interest rates typically reduces the volume of mortgage borrowings thus impacting residential construction activity;

the allocation of government funding for public infrastructure programmes, such as the development of highways in the United States under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21”); and

the level of demand for construction materials and services, with sustained adverse weather conditions leading to potential disruptions or curtailments in outdoor construction activity.

While economic conditions appear to be improving in the United States, a prolongation of or further deterioration in economic performance in Europe may result in further general reductions in construction activity in that area. Against this backdrop, the adequacy and timeliness of the actions taken by the CRH Group’s management team are of critical importance in maintaining financial performance at appropriate levels.

Each of the above factors could have a material adverse effect on the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s operating results and the market price of CRH plc’s Ordinary Shares.

52      CRH


Political and economic uncertainty
Risk FactorDiscussion

CURRENT YEARAs an international business, the CRH Group operates, and the Combined Group would operate, in many countries with differing, and in some cases potentially fast-changing economic, social and political conditions. These conditions could include political unrest, strikes, war and other forms of instability including natural disasters, epidemics, widespread transmission of diseases and terrorist attacks. With particular reference to developing markets, changes in these conditions, or in the governmental or regulatory requirements in any of the countries in which the CRH Group operates, or in which the Combined Group would operate, may adversely affect the business, results of operations, financial condition

or prospects of the CRH Group and/or the

Combined Group thus leading to possible impairment of financial performance and/or restrictions on future growth opportunities.

  

The adverse developments in eurozone economic performance in recent years, together with ongoing austerity programmes in various countries in Europe, have contributed to heightened global uncertainty. These uncertainties include whether the euro will continue as a unit of currency. While various actions have been taken by central banks and other institutions to stabilise the economic situation, the success of these actions cannot be guaranteed.

The CRH Group currently operates mainly in Western Europe and North America as well as, to a lesser degree, in developing countries/emerging markets in Eastern Europe, South America, China and India. The Combined Group would include a number of countries where the CRH Group does not currently have a significant presence, namely Serbia, Brazil and the Philippines. The economies of these countries are at varying stages of socioeconomic and macroeconomic development which could give rise to a number of risks, uncertainties and challenges and could include the following:

changes in political, social or economic conditions;

trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;

potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

labour practices and differing labour regulations;

procurement which contravenes ethical considerations;

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

state-imposed restrictions on repatriation of funds; and
the outbreak of armed conflict.
With regard to Ukraine, where the CRH Group has significant business interests, the outlook remains uncertain and the implications for construction activity in 2015 and beyond are unclear.
Commodity products and substitution
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group faces, and the Combined Group would face, strong volume and price competition across its product lines. In addition, existing products may be replaced by substitute products which the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group does not produce or distribute. Against this backdrop, if the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group fails to generate competitive advantage through differentiation and innovation across the value chain (for example, through superior product quality, engendering customer loyalty or excellence in logistics), market share, and thus financial performance, may decline.The competitive environment in which the CRH Group operates, and the Combined Group would operate, can be significantly impacted by general economic conditions in combination with local factors including the number of competitors, the degree of utilisation of production capacity and the specifics of product demand. Across the multitude of largely local markets in which the CRH Group conducts business, and the Combined Group would conduct business, downward pricing pressure is experienced from time to time, and the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group may not always be in a position to recover increased operating expenses (caused by factors such as increased fuel and raw material prices) through higher sale prices.
A number of the products sold by the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group (both those manufactured internally and those distributed) compete with other building products that do not feature in the existing product range. Any significant shift in demand preference from the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s existing products to substitute products, which the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group does not produce or distribute, could adversely impact market share and results of operations.

LOGO

CRH      53


LOGO

Acquisition activity
Risk FactorDiscussion
Growth through acquisition is a key element of the CRH Group’s strategy. The CRH Group and/or the Combined Group may not be able to continue to grow as contemplated in its business plan if it is unable to identify attractive targets (including potential new platforms for growth), execute full and proper due diligence, raise funds on acceptable terms, complete such acquisition transactions, integrate the operations of the acquired businesses and realise anticipated levels of profitability and cash flows. The CRH Group and/or the Combined Group may be liable for the past acts, omissions or liabilities of companies or businesses it has acquired, which may either be unforeseen or greater than anticipated at the time of the relevant acquisition.

The CRH Group’s acquisition strategy focuses on value-enhancing mid-sized acquisitions supplemented from time to time by larger strategic acquisitions into new markets or new building products. Subject to the factors highlighted below, the CRH Board intends that this will continue to be the case following completion of the proposed Acquisition.

The realisation of the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s acquisition strategy is dependent on the ability to identify and acquire suitable assets at appropriate prices thus satisfying the stringent cash flow and return on investment criteria underpinning such activities. The CRH Group and/or the Combined Group may not be able to identify such companies, and, even if identified, may not be able to acquire them because of a variety of factors including the outcome of due diligence processes, the ability to raise funds (as required) on acceptable terms, the need for competition authority approval in certain instances and competition for transactions from peers and other entities exploring acquisition opportunities in the building materials sector. If the proposed Acquisition is not completed, other acquisitions may not be identified and the Placing proceeds may be used for other corporate purposes. The CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to realise the expected benefits from acquisition activity depends, in large part, on its ability to integrate newly-acquired businesses in a timely and effective manner. Situations may arise where the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group may be liable for the past acts or omissions or liabilities of companies acquired; for example, the potential environmental liabilities addressed under the“Sustainability” Risk Factor below. Even if the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group is able to acquire suitable companies, it still may not be able to incorporate them successfully into the relevant legacy businesses and, accordingly, may be deprived of the expected benefits thus leading to potential dissipation and diversion of management resources and constraints on financial performance. See also “Risk Factors – Risks and Uncertainties Related to the Proposed Acquisition”.
Joint ventures and associates
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group does not have, and the Combined Group would not have, a controlling interest in certain of the businesses (i.e. joint ventures and associates) in which it has invested and may invest. The absence of a controlling interest gives rise to increased governance complexity and a need for proactive relationship management, which may restrict the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to generate adequate returns and to develop and grow these businesses.Due to the absence of full control of joint ventures and associates, important decisions such as the approval of business plans and the timing and amount of cash distributions and capital expenditures, for example, may require the consent of partners or may be approved without the CRH Group’s consent.
These limitations could impair the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to manage joint ventures and associates effectively and/or realise the strategic goals for these businesses. In addition, improper management or ineffective policies, procedures or controls for non-controlled entities could adversely affect the business, results of operations or financial condition of the relevant investment and, by corollary, the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.

54      CRH


Human resources
Risk FactorDiscussion
Existing processes to recruit, develop and retain talented individuals and promote their mobility may be inadequate thus giving rise to employee/management attrition and difficulties in succession planning and potentially impeding the continued realisation of the core strategy of performance and growth. In addition, the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group is exposed to various risks associated with collective representation of employees in certain jurisdictions. These risks could include strikes and increased wage demands with possible reputational consequences. The performance of the Combined Group would, amongst other things, be dependent on the retention and motivation of certain key management currently employed within the entities the CRH Group is proposing to acquire.The identification and subsequent assessment, management, development and deployment of talented individuals is of major importance in continuing to deliver on the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s core strategy of performance and growth and in ensuring that succession planning objectives for key executive roles throughout its international operations are satisfied. Programmes designed to focus on performance management skills and leadership development may not achieve their desired objectives.
The maintenance of positive employee and trade/labour union relations is key to the successful operation of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group. Some of the CRH Group’s employees, and those employed in the NewCo Group, are represented by trade/labour unions under various collective agreements. For unionised employees, the CRH Group and the individual entities within the NewCo Group may not be able to renegotiate satisfactorily the relevant collective agreements upon expiration and may face tougher negotiations and higher wage demands than would be the case for non-unionised employees. In addition, existing labour agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage with any such activity creating reputational risk and potentially having a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.
Corporate communications
Risk FactorDiscussion
As a publicly-listed company, the CRH Group undertakes, and the Combined Group would undertake, regular communication with its stakeholders. Given that these communications may contain forward-looking statements, which by their nature involve uncertainty, actual results and developments may differ from those communicated due to a variety of external and internal factors giving rise to reputational risk.The CRH Group places, and the Combined Group would place, great emphasis on timely and relevant corporate communications with overall responsibility for these matters being vested in senior management at the Group Head Office (largely the Chief Executive, the Finance Director, the Head of Investor Relations and the Group Director, Corporate Affairs) supported by engagement with highly experienced external advisors, where appropriate. The strategic, operational and financial performance of the CRH Group and of its constituent entities, including following the proposed Acquisition, the NewCo Group, is reported to the Board on a monthly basis with all results announcements and other externally-issued documentation (e.g. the Annual Report on Form 20-F) being discussed by the Board/Audit Committee prior to release.
Cyber and information technology
Risk FactorDiscussion
As a result of the proliferation of information technology in the world today, the CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, dependent on the employment of advanced information systems and is exposed to risks of failure in the operation of these systems. Further, the CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, exposed to security threats to its digital infrastructure through cyber-crime which might lead to interference with production processes, manipulation of financial data, the theft of private data or misrepresentation of information via digital media. In addition to potential irretrievability or corruption of critical data, the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group could suffer reputational losses and incur significant financial costs in remediation. Such attacks are by their nature technologically sophisticated and may be difficult to detect and defend in a timely fashion.The CRH Group attaches importance to addressing security and cyber threats to its digital infrastructure given the increasing sophistication and evolving nature of these threats. Such attacks may result in interference with production software, corruption or theft of sensitive data, manipulation of financial data accessible through its digital infrastructure, or reputational losses as a result of misrepresentation via social media and other websites. While the CRH Group has made a significant investment in upgrading its digital infrastructure and governance processes with the overall objective of further enhancing system security, there can be no assurance that future attacks will not be successful due to their increasing sophistication and the difficulties in detecting and defending against them in a timely fashion.

LOGO

CRH      55


LOGO

Sustainability
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, subject to stringent and evolving laws, regulations, standards and best practices in the area of sustainability (comprising corporate governance, environmental management and climate change (specifically capping of emissions), health and safety management and social performance) which may give rise to increased ongoing remediation and/or other compliance costs and may adversely affect the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and/or prospects.

The CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, subject to a broad and increasingly stringent range of existing and evolving laws, regulations, standards and best practices with respect to governance, the environment and health and safety measures in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates/would operate giving rise to significant compliance costs, potential legal liability exposure and potential limitations on the development of its operations. These laws, regulations, standards and best practices relate to, amongst other things, climate change, noise, emissions to air, water and soil, the use and handling of hazardous materials and waste disposal practices. Given the above, the risk of increased environmental and other compliance costs and unplanned capital expenditure is inherent in conducting business in the building materials sector and the impact of future developments in these respects on the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s activities, products, operations, profitability and cash flow cannot be estimated; there can therefore be no assurance that material liabilities and costs will not be incurred in the future or that material limitations on the development of its operations will not arise.

Environmental and health and safety and other laws, regulations, standards and best practices may expose the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group to the risk of substantial costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with assets that have been sold or acquired and activities that have been discontinued. In addition, many of the CRH Group’s manufacturing sites have a history of industrial use and, while strict environmental operating standards are applied and extensive environmental due diligence is undertaken in acquisition activity, some soil and groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at a limited number of sites. Although the associated remediation costs incurred to date have not been material, they may become more significant in the future. Despite the CRH Group’s policy and efforts to comply with all applicable environmental and health and safety laws, it may face increased remediation liabilities and additional legal proceedings concerning environmental and health and safety matters in the future.

Based on information currently available, the CRH Group has budgeted capital and revenue expenditures for environmental improvement projects and has established reserves for known environmental remediation liabilities that are probable and reasonably capable of estimation. These figures are not material in the context of the CRH Group. However, neither the CRH Group nor the Combined Group can predict environmental and health and safety matters with certainty, and budgeted amounts and established reserves may not be adequate for all purposes. In addition, the development or discovery of new facts, events, circumstances or conditions, including future decisions to close plants, which may trigger remediation liabilities, and other developments such as changes in laws or increasingly strict enforcement by governmental authorities, could result in increased costs and liabilities or prevent or restrict some of the operations of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the reputation, business, results of operations and overall financial condition of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.

For additional information see also “Introduction – The Environment and Government Regulations”.

56      CRH


Laws and regulations
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, subject to many local and international laws and regulations, including those relating to competition law, corruption and fraud, across many jurisdictions of operation and is/would be exposed to changes in those laws and regulations and to the outcome of any investigations conducted by governmental, international and other regulatory authorities, which may result in the imposition of fines and/or sanctions fornon-compliance, and may potentially inflict reputational damage.

The CRH Group is, and the Combined Group would be, subject to various statutes, regulations and laws applicable to businesses generally in the countries and markets in which it operates/would operate. These include statutes, regulations and laws affecting land usage, zoning, labour and employment practices, competition, financial reporting, taxation, anti-bribery, anti-corruption, governance and other matters. The CRH Group mandates that its employees comply with its Code of Business Conduct which stipulates best practices in relation to regulatory matters. Neither the CRH Group, nor the Combined Group, can guarantee that their employees will at all times be successful in complying with all demands of regulatory agencies in a manner which will not materially adversely affect the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.

The CRH Group seeks to comply fully with legislation such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the United States and the Bribery Act in the United Kingdom and has put in place significant internal controls and compliance policies and procedures. However, there can be no assurance that such established policies and procedures will afford adequate protection against fraudulent and/or corrupt activity and any such activity could have a material adverse effect on the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.
Key Financial and Reporting Risk Factors
Financial instruments (interest rate and leverage, foreign currency, counterparty, credit ratings and liquidity)
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group uses, and the Combined Group would use, financial instruments throughout its businesses giving rise to interest rate and leverage, foreign currency, counterparty, credit rating and liquidity risks. A significant portion of the cash generated by the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group from operational activity is currently/would be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness. In addition, the CRH Group has entered into certain financing agreements containing restrictive covenants requiring it to maintain a certain minimum interest coverage ratio and a certain minimum net worth. A downgrade of the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s credit ratings may give rise to increases in funding costs in respect of future debt and may impair the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to raise funds on acceptable terms. In addition, against the backdrop of heightened uncertainties in the eurozone, insolvency of the financial institutions with which the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group conducts business (or a downgrade in their credit ratings) may lead to losses in derivative assets and cash and cash equivalents balances or render it more difficult either to utilise existing debt capacity or otherwise obtain financing for operations.

Interest rate and leverage risks:The CRH Group’s exposures to changes in interest rates result from investing and borrowing activities undertaken to manage liquidity and capital requirements and stem predominantly from long-term debt obligations. Borrowing costs are managed through employing a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and interest rate swaps, where appropriate. As at 31 December 2014, the Group had outstanding net indebtedness of approximately €2.5 billion (2013: €3.0 billion). On Closing, the Combined Group will have significant outstanding indebtedness, which may impair its operating and financial flexibility over the longer term and could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial position. This high level of indebtedness could give rise to the Combined Group dedicating a substantial portion of its cash flow to debt service thereby reducing the funds available in the longer term for working capital, capital expenditure, acquisitions, distributions to shareholders and other general corporate purposes and limiting its ability to borrow additional funds and to respond to competitive pressures. In addition, the increased level of indebtedness as a result of the proposed Acquisition may give rise to a general increase in interest rates borne and there can be no assurance that the Combined Group will not be adversely impacted by increases in borrowing costs in the future.

For the year ended 31 December 2014, PBITDA/net interest (all as defined in the relevant agreements as discussed in note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), which is the CRH Group’s principal financial covenant, was 7.0 times (2013: 6.3 times); we anticipate that, aside from the impact of once-off costs arising on acquisition, PBITDA/net interest cover will be largely unchanged as a result of the proposed Acquisition. The prescribed minimum PBITDA/net interest cover ratio is 4.5 times and the prescribed minimum net worth is €5 billion.

Foreign currency risks:If the euro, which is the CRH Group’s reporting currency, weakens relative to the basket of foreign currencies in which net debt is denominated (principally the US Dollar, Pound Sterling and the Swiss Franc), the net debt balance would increase; the converse would apply if the euro was to strengthen. The CRH Group’s established policy to spread its net worth across the currencies of its operations, with the objective of limiting its exposure to individual currencies and thus promoting consistency with geographical balance, may not be successful.

LOGO

CRH      57


LOGO

Financial instruments (interest rate and leverage, foreign currency, counterparty, credit ratings and liquidity) – continuedCounterparty risks: Insolvency of the financial institutions with which the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group conducts business, or a downgrade in their credit ratings, may lead to losses in derivative assets and cash and cash equivalents balances or render it more difficult either to utilise existing debt capacity or otherwise obtain financing for operations. The maximum exposure arising in the event of default on the part of the counterparty (including insolvency) is the carrying amount of the relevant financial instrument.
The CRH Group holds significant cash balances on deposit with a variety of highly-rated financial institutions (typically invested on a short-term basis) which, together with cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 2014, totalled €3.3 billion (2013: €2.5 billion). In addition to the above, the CRH Group enters into derivative transactions with a variety of highly-rated financial institutions giving rise to derivative assets and derivative liabilities; the relevant balances as at 31 December 2014 were €102 million and €23 million respectively (2013: €80 million and €53 million respectively). The counterparty risks inherent in these exposures may give rise to losses in the event that the relevant financial institutions suffer a ratings downgrade or become insolvent. In addition, certain of the CRH Group’s activities (e.g. highway paving in the United States) give rise to significant amounts receivable from counterparties at the balance sheet date; at year-end 2014, this balance was €0.5 billion (2013: €0.4 billion). In the current business environment, there is increased exposure to counterparty default, particularly as regards bad debts.
Credit rating risks:A downgrade of the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s credit ratings may give rise to increases in funding costs in respect of future debt and may, among other concerns, impair its ability to access debt markets or otherwise raise funds or enter into letters of credit, for example, on acceptable terms. Such a downgrade may result from factors specific to the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group, including as a result of the increased indebtedness resulting from the proposed Acquisition, or from other factors such as general economic or sector-specific weakness or sovereign credit rating ceilings.
Liquidity risks:The principal liquidity risks stem from the maturation of debt obligations and derivative transactions. The CRH Group aims to achieve flexibility in funding sources through a variety of means including (i) maintaining cash and cash equivalents with a number of highly-rated counterparties; (ii) limiting the maturity of such balances; (iii) meeting the bulk of debt requirements through committed bank lines or other term financing; and (iv) having surplus committed lines of credit. However, market or economic conditions may make it difficult at times to realise this objective.
For additional information on the above risks see note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See also “Risk Factors – Risks and Uncertainties Related to the Proposed Acquisition”.

58      CRH


Defined benefit pension schemes and related obligations
Risk FactorDiscussion

The CRH Group, and various entities within the NewCo Group, operate a number of defined benefit pension schemes and related obligations (e.g. termination indemnities and jubilee/long-term service benefits, which are accounted for as defined benefit) in certain of their operating jurisdictions.

The assets and liabilities of defined benefit pension schemes may exhibit significant period-on-period volatility attributable primarily to asset values, changes in bond yields/discount rates and anticipated longevity. In addition to the contributions required for the ongoing service of participating employees, significant cash contributions may be required to remediate deficits applicable to past service. In addition, fluctuations in the accounting surplus/deficit may adversely impact credit metrics thus harming the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to raise funds.

The assumptions used in the recognition of pension assets, liabilities, income and expenses (including discount rates, rate of increase in future compensation levels, mortality rates and healthcare cost trend rates) are updated based on market and economic conditions at the respective balance sheet date and for any relevant changes to the terms and conditions of the pension and post-retirement plans. These assumptions can be affected by (i) for the discount rate, changes in the rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments; (ii) for future compensation levels, future labour market conditions and anticipated inflation; (iii) for mortality rates, changes in the relevant actuarial funding valuations or changes in best practice; and (iv) for healthcare cost trend rates, the rate of medical cost inflation in the relevant regions. The weighted average actuarial assumptions used and sensitivity analysis in relation to the significant assumptions employed in the determination of pension and other post-retirement liabilities are disclosed on pages 176 and 178. A prolonged period of financial market instability would have an adverse impact on the valuations of pension scheme assets.

In addition, a number of the defined benefit pension schemes in operation throughout the CRH Group have reported material funding deficits thus necessitating remediation either in accordance with legislative requirements or as agreed with the relevant regulators. These obligations are reflected in the contracted payments disclosure on page 69. The extent of such contributions may be exacerbated over time as a result of a prolonged period of instability in worldwide financial markets.

Adequacy of insurance arrangements and related counterparty exposures
Risk FactorDiscussion
The building materials sector is subject to a wide range of operating risks and hazards, not all of which can be covered, adequately or at all, by insurance; these risks and hazards would include climatic conditions such as floods and hurricanes/cyclones, seismic activity, technical failures, interruptions to power supplies, industrial accidents and disputes, environmental hazards, fire and crime. In its worldwide insurance programme, into which the NewCo Group would be assimilated, the CRH Group provides coverage for its operations at a level believed to be commensurate with the associated risks. In the event of failure of one or more of its insurance counterparties, the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group could be impacted by losses where recovery from such counterparties is not possible.

Insurance protection is maintained with leading, highly-rated international insurers with appropriate risk retention by wholly-owned insurance companies (captive insurers) and by insured entities in the context of the deductibles/excesses borne. The coverage includes property damage and business interruption, public and products liability/general liability, employer’s liability/workmens’ compensation, environmental impairment liability, automobile liability and directors’ and officers’ liability. Adequate coverage at reasonable rates is not always commercially available to cover all potential risks and no assurance can be given that the insurance arrangements in place would be sufficient to cover all losses or liabilities to which the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group might be exposed. The occurrence of a significant adverse event not covered, or only partially covered, by insurance could have a material adverse impact on the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.

As at 31 December 2014, the total insurance provision, which is subject to periodic actuarial valuation and is discounted, amounted to €208 million (2013: €181 million); a substantial proportion of this figure pertained to claims which are classified as “incurred but not reported”.

LOGO

CRH      59


LOGO

Foreign currency translation
Risk FactorDiscussion
The CRH Group’s activities are conducted primarily in the local currency of the country of operation resulting in low levels of foreign currency transactional risk. This situation is equally applicable to the activities of the NewCo Group. The principal foreign exchange risks to which the Consolidated Financial Statements of the CRH Group are exposed pertain to adverse movements in reported results when translated into euro (which is the CRH Group’s, and would be the Combined Group’s, reporting currency) together with declines in the euro value of net investments, which are denominated in a wide basket of currencies other than the euro. Closing of the proposed Acquisition will increase exposure to a number of currencies, which have hitherto been immaterial, and will introduce exposures to some new currencies. The most significant currency exposures for the Combined Group will be the US Dollar, the Canadian Dollar, the Swiss Franc, the Polish Zloty, the Pound Sterling and the Philippine Peso.A significant proportion of the CRH Group’s revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the euro, principally US Dollars, Swiss Francs, Polish Zlotys and Pounds Sterling. From year to year, adverse changes in the exchange rates used to translate these and other foreign currencies into euro have impacted and will continue to impact consolidated results and net worth. For additional information on the impact of foreign exchange movements on the Consolidated Financial Statements for the CRH Group for the year ended 31 December 2014, see the Business Performance Review section commencing on page 66 and note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill impairment
Risk FactorDiscussion
Significant under-performance in any of the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s major cash-generating units or the divestment of businesses in the future may give rise to a material write-down of goodwill, which would have a substantial impact on income and equity.An acquisition generates goodwill to the extent that the price paid exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired. Under IFRS, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortised but are subject to annual impairment testing. Other intangible assets deemed separable from goodwill arising on acquisitions are amortised. A detailed discussion of the impairment testing process, the key assumptions used, the results of that testing and the related sensitivity analysis is contained in note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 159 and 160.
Whilst a goodwill impairment charge does not impact cash flow, a full write-down at 31 December 2014 would have resulted in a charge to income and a reduction in equity of €4.0 billion (2013: €3.7 billion).
Inspections by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”)
Risk FactorDiscussion
Our auditors, like other independent registered public accounting firms operating in Ireland and a number of other European countries, are not currently permitted to be subject to inspection by the PCAOB, and as such, investors are deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections.As a public company, our auditors are required by United States law to undergo regular PCAOB inspections to assess their compliance with United States law and professional standards in connection with their audits of financial statements filed with the SEC. Under Irish law, the PCAOB is currently unable to inspect and evaluate the audit work and quality control procedures of auditors in Ireland. Accordingly investors who rely on our auditors’ audit reports are deprived of the benefits of PCAOB inspections of auditors.

60      CRH


Risks and Uncertainties Related to the Proposed Acquisition

This section documents the principal transaction-specific risks and uncertainties presented by the proposed Acquisition.

Closing of the proposed Acquisition is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver, where applicable) of various conditions precedent
Risk FactorDiscussion

Closing of the proposed Acquisition is subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions: (i) the approval by CRH shareholders of the Resolution to undertake the proposed Acquisition at an Extraordinary General Meeting of CRH plc; (ii) successful completion of the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim; and (iii) the completion of certain local reorganisations by Lafarge and Holcim in advance of the proposed Acquisition.

There can be no guarantee that these conditions precedent will be met and that the proposed Acquisition will be completed as proposed or at all.

A failure to consummate the proposed Acquisition would give rise to a number of risks. The most material of these risks are the following:

a decline in the market price of CRH’s Ordinary Shares;

the incurrence of break fees as outlined on page 186;

the failure to meet strategic objectives; and
the incurrence of standby financing costs pending completion of the proposed Acquisition.
Risks of executing the transaction could cause the market price of CRH’s Ordinary Shares to decline
Risk FactorDiscussion
The market price of CRH’s Ordinary Shares may decline as a result of the proposed Acquisition.

Among other factors, the following could cause the market price of CRH’s Ordinary Shares to decline as a result of the proposed Acquisition:

regulatory approvals may take longer than expected, may not be forthcoming or conditions may be imposed;
the integration of the acquired businesses is delayed or unsuccessful leading to the failure to meet strategic objectives;
the Combined Group does not achieve the anticipated benefits and synergies of the proposed Acquisition within the timescale envisaged by the CRH Board and management; and
the effect of the proposed Acquisition on CRH’s consolidated financial results of operations falls short of the expectations of the CRH Board and management.

LOGO

CRH      61


LOGO

The Combined Group may fail, or may take longer than currently anticipated, to realise the perceived benefits of the proposed Acquisition. In addition, the Combined Group may encounter difficulties in integrating the acquired entities into pre-existing organisational structures.
Risk FactorDiscussion
There can be no assurance that the integration of the proposed Acquisition into the existing operations of the CRH Group will achieve the business growth opportunities, margin benefits, cost savings and other synergies anticipated by the CRH Board and management. Should the anticipated benefits and synergies fail to materialise or the quantum thereof falls short of expectations, the assumptions used to justify the consideration payable may prove to be incorrect and the results of operations and the financial condition of the Combined Group may be adversely affected.

The future prospects of the Combined Group will, in part, be dependent upon CRH’s ability to integrate the acquired entities. Some of the potential challenges in integration may not become known until after Closing. The key potential difficulties associated with integration of the NewCo Group could include the following:

the complexity and costs of transferring employees and assets and consolidating and integrating operations, infrastructure, processes, procedures, systems, facilities, services and policies across different countries, jurisdictions, regulatory systems and cultures;

ability to maintain employee engagement and retain and incentivise key employees;

diversion of management time and resources away from the day-to-day operations of the CRH Group and disrupting business continuity;

redeploying resources in different areas of operations causing disruption of the business;
unforeseen legal, regulatory, contractual, labour and other issues arising from the proposed Acquisition together with ineffective mitigation thereof and limited recourse against the Sellers;
unanticipated capital expenditure requirements; and
the risk of the regulatory authorities requiring the CRH Group to sell assets below the valuation reflected in the purchase price.
Difficulties experienced in the integration process could potentially lead to, amongst other matters, higher integration costs, lower benefits or cost savings, interruption of business operations and loss of customers, suppliers or key personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, overall financial condition and prospects of the Combined Group.

62      CRH


Financing for the proposed Acquisition (i) will increase the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s leverage and interest costs; (ii) may reduce operating flexibility under existing financial covenants; and (iii) may adversely impact credit ratings and the ability to obtain additional financing for future opportunitiesIn order to finance the proposed Acquisition, the CRH Group plans to use existing cash resources and enter into new bank facilities (as well as using the proceeds of the placing by CRH of 74,039,915 new Ordinary Shares), which would increase its leverage and interest costs, may reduce its operating flexibility under the financial covenants for its existing debt and may adversely impact the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s credit ratings and its ability to obtain additional financing for future opportunities either in the medium or longer term. The incurrence of this additional indebtedness and the related increase in funding costs could result in downgrades of credit ratings potentially making future financing more difficult to obtain due to limitations imposed by financial covenants and perceptions about the CRH Group’s and/or the Combined Group’s ability to meet its debt obligations.
Transaction-related costs may exceed expectationsShould the proposed Acquisition proceed, CRH will incur costs in integrating the acquired entities and in delivering the synergies identified. The actual costs incurred may exceed current estimates and additional and unforeseen expenses may arise in connection with the proposed Acquisition. In addition, CRH has incurred and will incur legal, accounting and transaction fees and other costs relating directly to the proposed Acquisition, the majority of which are payable irrespective of Closing. Such costs could materially and adversely affect the realisation of synergies and the results of operations of the CRH Group and/or the Combined Group.
Reliance on third party informationInformation has been provided to CRH by the Sellers in respect of the NewCo Group. Any failure by the Sellers to disclose matters that CRH is unaware of may affect the significance or accuracy of any such information. If any such undisclosed matters exist and are adverse to the NewCo Group, they may have an adverse effect on the Combined Group’s future financial condition and results of operations and/or may result in additional costs or liabilities to the Combined Group.

LOGO

CRH      63


LOGO

64        CRH


Preferred Materials performed the paving and supplied 36,240 tonnes of asphalt on Boyette Road, a 2.2 mile project in Lithia, Florida.

Business Performance Review  
    Page  

 

 

Current Year Review

 66  

 

 

Finance Director’s Introduction 66  

 

 

Contractual Obligations 69  

 

 

Operating Segment Reviews 70  

 

 

Prior Year Review

 77  

 

 

LOGO

Chief Executive’s Review

38

Finance Review

41

Segment Review

45

PRIOR YEAR REVIEWS

54CRH      65

CRH    37


LOGO

Business Performance Review1

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Chief Executive’s ReviewFinance Director’s Introduction

The following discussion should be read2014 was a year of growth for CRH, with improved performance in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of CRH that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

The terms “ongoing”, “organic”, “underlying”, “like-for-like” and “heritage” have the same meaning in the discussion that follows.

Key Aspects of 2011 Results

Sales increased by just over 5% to18.1 billion (2010:17.2 billion). Underlying like-for-like sales advanced by just under 5% while incremental sales arising from 2010/2011 acquisitions outweighed the impact of business disposals and adverse exchange translation effects.

EBITDA (as defined)* amounted to1,656 million, a41 million increase on the1,615 million reported for 2010. EBITDA (as defined)* is stated after charging costs of61 million (2010:100 million) associated with the Group’s ongoing restructuring initiatives.

Operating profit increased by 25% to871 million (2010:698 million) after restructuring and impairment charges of82 million (2010:202 million).

Profit before taxation of711 million (2010:534 million) showed an increase of 33% after charging total restructuring and impairment charges (including associates) of93 million (2010:224 million).

Earnings per share up 35% to 82.6c (2010: 61.3c) with dividend per share maintained at 62.5c. Dividend cover improved to 1.3 times from 1.0 times.

Year-end net debt of3.5 billion was in line with December 2010. CRH continues to have one of the strongest balance sheets in our sector with year-end net debt to EBITDA (as defined)* of 2.1 times and 2011 EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio of 6.4 times.

My thanks to our world-wide team across 36 countries for their ongoing commitment and dedication throughout a challenging year.

“The positive profit outcome for 2011 demonstrates the advantages of CRH’s product and sectoral end-use balance and the benefits of the extensive reorganisation and restructuring measures implemented in response to the exceptionally difficult markets of recent years.”

Myles Lee

LOGO

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

As disclosed in note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, liquid investments and derivative financial instruments.

38    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Summary of 2011 Results

Trading in the early months of 2011 benefited from a much more favourable weather backdrop than at the start of 2010. Reported sales revenue for the first half increaseddriven by 7%; on a like-for-like basis, excludingfavourable weather in Europe, and the impact of acquisitions, divestments and translation, underlying sales increased by 5%.

With increased strainssecond half benefiting from improved momentum in financial markets, the pace of underlying growth, particularly in core Eurozone markets, slowed through the third quarter while heavy September rainfall in parts of the United States also had an adverse impact. However,States. The Group continued to focus on cash generation finishing the year in a strong finishand flexible financial position. Net debt at year-end 2014 reduced by €0.5 billion compared to 2013. This was achieved with strong cash inflows from operations, and proceeds of €0.35 billion from disposals, partly offset by spend of €0.62 billion on acquisitions, investments and capital expenditure, and dividend payments of €0.36 billion.

Key Components of 2014 Performance

Overall sales for 2014 were 5% ahead of 2013, while organic sales from underlying operations were up 4%, reflecting strong favourable weather-impacted demand in Europe in the first half and increasing activity in the United States.

In Europe, after the encouraging start to the year with mild November/December weather conditions resulted in a 4% second-halfwhich saw like-for-like sales increase (5% underlying).

Overall sales revenue for the year of18.1 billion was ahead of 2010. The underlying increase of 5% comprised a volume increase of approximately 3% and an increase of approximately 2% in average selling prices. This level of price increase, achieved in highly competitive markets, was not sufficient to recover the higher input costs experienced across the Group.

Europe Materials delivered improved overall profits despite energy input cost challenges and lower benefits fromby 6% helped by favourable early-season weather, trading in CO2 allowances. Results from operations in developing and stable regions, which account for roughly 85% of this segment’s EBITDA (as defined)*, were generally positive and benefited from acquisitions; however trading remained tough in the “austerity economies” of Ireland, Spain and Portugal, which together generated roughly 15% of segment EBITDA (as defined)*.

Europe Products made good overall progress in 2011, although with increasing uncertainty in Eurozone financial markets in the second half of the year sales momentum slowed compared with the first half. Higher restructuring costs and the absence of earnings from businesses disposed of resulted in a slight decline in overall EBITDA (as defined)*; however, with lower impairment charges operating profit showed a significant increase.

Europe Distribution had a landmark year as, assistedwas impacted by acquisitions, sales revenue exceeded the4 billion level for the first time while margins moved ahead. Although demand moderated in the second half, this segment’s Repair, Maintenance and Improvement (RMI) exposure mitigated the slow-down.

The full year out-turn for Americas Materials was better than projected in our November trading statement as a favourable end to the construction season weather-wise enabled us to out-perform our earlier expectations. Total energy-related costs, including liquid asphalt, diesel, gasoline and fuel oils, as a proportion of segment sales, increased by over 2 percentage points. Against this backdrop, and with highly competitive markets, limiting the margin decline for this business to less than 1% was a considerable achievement.

Americas Products delivered improved results and a return to operating profit following significant impairment costs and tough trading in 2010. With higher fuel and other input costs, and the costs associated with the roll-out of the Building Solutions programme, like-for-like results in North America were below 2010. Lower profitability in Argentina led to a reduced contribution from South America.

Americas Distribution enjoyed good sales growth in 2011 and finished the year strongly. Although markets were competitive and product costs rose sharply, margins moved ahead at both EBITDA (as defined)* and operating profit level.

The cost reduction and operational excellence initiatives which commenced in 2007 continued in 2011 and cumulative annualised savings from these actions over the five years to 2011 now stand at2 billion. The incremental savings generated in 2011 amounted to154 million but were more than offset by input cost increases that were not recovered in pricing.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

CRH    39


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

2012 Outlook

In Europe, the European Central Bank’s Long Term Refinancing Operations which commenced in late December have eased the pressures on funding in the Eurozone banking sector. However, the banking sector remains highly leveraged and continuing reductions in bank balance sheets are leading to lower corporate and personal lending. These factors are contributing to the current uncertainty in relation to the growth outlook for Europe in 2012. In the Americas, the flow of economic data in the US has been incrementally positive since the third quarter of 2011, with ongoing favourable job creation numbers and an improving growth outlook after a soft patch in the economy in mid-2011. These indicators suggest that the US should avoid a double-dip recession with some commentators now projecting more robust GDP growth in 2012 than that achieved overall in 2011.

It is still too early to assess the effect of recent financial market volatility on European construction prospects for 2012 although first half demand seems likely to suffer some impact. Nevertheless, for the year as a whole we currently expect resilient demand in Poland and Germany and only modest declines from a strong 2011 in Finland and Switzerland (these four countries accounted for roughly a quarter of 2011 Group sales), while our recently-commissioned cement plant in Ukraine will yield major operational improvements. Activity in our other European markets is likely to be more subdued than in 2011. While the outlook for the Benelux and France (together almost 20% of 2011 Group sales) has weakened, our significant RMI exposures in these countries should once again support performance in 2012. In the Americas, indications of a likely pick-up in new housing activity in the US have strengthened over recent months while there is increasing evidence that non-residential markets are beginning to bottom out. With the current extension to the Federal Highway Funding programme expiring at end-March, political debate on a renewed programme, or on further extensions to the existing programme, has intensified. Our expectation is that an extension at a funding level close to that provided for 2011 will eventually be agreed for 2012.

Assuming no major economic or energy market dislocations, we expect to generate further like-for-like revenue growth in 2012 with the achievement of targeted price increases a key priority. This combined with benefits from acquisitions completed in 2011 leads us to expect further progress in the year ahead.

40    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Finance Review

Key Components of 2011 Performance

million  Revenue  EBITDA (as
defined)*
  Operating
profit
  Profit on
disposals
  Finance
costs
  Associates’
profit
after tax
  Pre-tax
profit
 

2010 as reported

   17,173    1,615    698    55    (247  28    534  

Exchange effects

   (243  (24  (4  (1  5    -    -  

2010 at 2011 exchange rates

   16,930    1,591    694    54    (242  28    534  

Incremental impact in 2011 of:

        

2010 and 2011 acquisitions

   805    78    49    -    (8  -    41  

2010 and 2011 divestments

   (469  (1  16    17    5    (3  35  

Restructuring costs

   -    39    39    -    -    -    39  

Impairment charges

   -    -    81    -    -    11    92  

Ongoing operations

   815    (51  (8  (16  (12  6    (30

2011 as reported

   18,081    1,656    871    55    (257  42    711  

% change

   +5%    +3%    +25%       +33%  

The table above analyses the change in results from 2010 to 2011.moderating trends across all three segments. Overall like-for-like sales for the year increased by 2%. EBITDA
(as defined)* margin increased due to increased capacity utilisation, efficiency measures and cost saving actions.

Against an improving market backdrop as the year progressed, like-for-like sales in the Americas were up 8% in the second half, compared with a first half increase of 4%. In our Materials business, like-for-like sales improved throughout the year and finished 7% ahead. Our Products and Distribution businesses which were impacted by unfavourable weather patterns in the early part of the year, benefited from improving demand in the second half particularly from new residential construction, and like-for-like sales were 5% ahead of 2010, the first annual organic sales increase for the Group since 2007.2013. With higher sales revenue, improved efficiencies and lower restructuring costs,good cost control, EBITDA (as defined)* was ahead of last year, although the impact of significant energy-related cost increases, particularlymargins improved in all three Americas segments.

1 See cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements on our materials businesses in both Europepage 9.

* Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Americas, limitedGroup’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

66        CRH


LOGO

During 2014, the increase to €41 million (+3%). The full year depreciationUS Dollar remained relatively stable at approximately 1.33 against the euro, however the weakening of currencies like the Ukrainian Hryvnia and amortisation expense, before impairment charges, was 6% lower than last year at €764 million (2010: 815 million); this, combined with a €81 million reduction in impairment charges, contributed to a 25% improvement in operating profit. Group operating profit margin improved to 4.8% (2010: 4.1%), the first increase in this metric since 2007. Additional detail on the sales, EBITDA (as defined)* and operating profits for each of CRH’s six reporting segments is set out in the Segment Reviews on pages 45 to 53.

Currency movements had a relatively minor impact on 2011 results, with a 12% strengthening of the average Swiss Franc exchange rate versus the euroArgentine Peso, partly offset by the weakerstrengthening of Sterling, were the principal factors behind the exchange effects shown in the table below. The average US Dollar (-5%) and average Polish Zloty (-3%) rates.

Acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2011 contributed incremental sales revenue of805 million and operating profit of49 million in 2011. The impact of divested activities was a negative469 million in sales, and, as these operations generated net losses in 2010, the disposal impact at operating profit level was a contribution of16 million.

We continue to review and, when required, extend our cost reduction programme. Costs of61 million incurred in 2011 to implement these savings were39 million lower (2010:100 million).

Impairment charges for 2011 at32 million were significantly lower (2010:124 million), and included11 million (2010:22 million) related to our investment in associates.

Revenue from ongoing operations increased by815 million (+5%) on a like-for-like basis in 2011, with the Europe segments accounting for 70%year-end 2014 exchange rates of the increase. Despitemajor currencies impacting on the recovery in sales, price competition remained intense and higher input costs, especially energy-related costs, were not fully recovered and as a result organic operating profit declined by8 million.

Net finance costs of257 million were slightly higher than 2010.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

CRH    41


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Key Financial Performance Indicators

Some key financial performance indicators which, taken together, are a measure of performance and financial strength,Group are set out below.on page 145.

    2011   2010 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

   9.2%     9.4%  

Operating profit margin

   4.8%     4.1%  

EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio

   6.4x     6.5x  

Effective tax rate

   16.0%     17.8%  

Shareholder return

   +3%     -16%  

Net debt as % of total equity

   33%     33%  

Net debt as % of market capitalisation

   32%     32%  

The Group EBITDA (as defined)* margin declined by 0.2 percentage points asWe continued to advance the significant increasecost-reduction initiatives which have been progressively implemented since 2007 and which by year-end had generated cumulative annualised savings of over €2.5 billion. Total restructuring costs associated with these initiatives (which generated savings of €118 million in input costs was not fully recovered2014) amounted to €51 million in selling prices. Operating profit margin however improved by 0.7 percentage points in 2011 to 4.8%, reflecting the lower impairment charges this year. Management believes that the EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio is useful to investors because it matches the earnings2014 (2013: €71 million) and cash generated by the business to the underlying funding costs. With similar levels of EBITDA (as defined)* and interest in both 2010 and 2011, EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio was little changed at 6.4 times (2010: 6.5 times).were once again heavily focussed on our European Divisions.

The effective tax rate of 16% of pre-tax profit was lower than 2010 (17.8%), primarily reflecting the lower non-tax-deductible impairment charges.

The share price at 31 December 2011 was15.36, 1% lower than the 2010 closing price (15.50); however, with the 2011 dividend at 62.5c, the net return for shareholders for the year was a positive 3%. This follows returns of -16% in 2010 and +22% in 2009. With effect from 16 December 2011, CRH is included in the FTSE 100 and FTSE All Share indices. At year-end 2011, CRH’s market capitalisation was11.0 billion (2010:11.0 billion), ranking the Group at number three in its building materials peer group.

Total shareholders’ equity increased by0.2 billion to10.6 billion during 2011, with the net comprehensive income for the year of0.5 billion and offset by dividends of0.3 billion. Year-end total interest-bearing loans and borrowings decreased by0.4 billion to5.0 billion (2010:5.4 billion). Year-end net debt of3.5 billion was broadly in line with year-end 2010, and accordingly the percentage of net debt to total equity remained at 33% at year-end 2011. With year-end market capitalisation broadly in line with year-end 2010, the debt/market capitalisation percentage also remained in line with 2010 at 32%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – 20112014 compared with 20102013

The comments that follow refer to the major components of the Group’s cash flows as shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on page 103.138.

Cash flows from operations

Net operatingThroughout 2014 the Group continued to keep a focus on cash inflows amounted to1,026 millionmanagement, targeting in 2011, a reductionparticular working capital and capital expenditure. Year-end working capital of365 million €2 billion represented just 10.6% of sales, an improvement compared with 2010, largely asyear-end 2013 (11.2%). This performance delivered a result of net working capital movements. Working capital levels are driven by trends in overall sales and also by seasonal weather patterns. The organic sales growth achieved in 2011, combined with the strong finish topositive movement (inflow) for the year as a result of better weather in November/December 2011 (compared with the same period in 2010), resulted in a net working capital outflow of211€35 million in 2011 (2010: inflow of142(2013: €77 million). Despite this net outflow, our working capital metrics for 2011 remained in line with 2010,

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

As disclosed in note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, liquid investments and derivative financial instruments.

42    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

maintaining the strong progress achieved in 2009 and 2010. CRH believes that its current working capital is sufficient for the Group’s present requirements.

The key components Strong control of the movementspending on property, plant and equipment resulted in working capital are analysedlower cash outflows of €435 million (2013: €497 million), with spend in note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash flows from investing and financing activities

At576 million, capital expenditure represented 3.2% of Group revenue (2010: 2.7%) and amounted to 78%2014 representing 69% of depreciation (2010: 59%(2013: 74%).

 

  Key Components of 2014 Performance

 

         

  € million

 

Revenue

 

 

EBITDA
(as defined)*

 

 

Operating
profit

 

 

Profit on
disposal

 

 

Finance
costs (net)

 

 

Equity
accounted
investments†

 

 

Pre-tax
profit/(loss)

 

 

  2013

 18,031   1,475   100   26   (297 (44 (215

  Exchange effects

 (62 (11 (4 -   (1 5   -  

  2013 at 2014 exchange rates

 17,969   1,464   96   26   (298 (39 (215

  Incremental impact in 2014 of:

                     

  - 2014 and 2013 acquisitions

 237   16   4   -   -   (2 2  

  - 2014 and 2013 divestments

 (25 -   1   43   -   (1 43  

  - Restructuring costs

 -   20   20   -   -   -   20  

  - Pension/CO2 gains

 -   (23 (23 -   -   -   (23

  - Impairment charges

 -   -   601   -   -   105   706  

  Ongoing operations

 731   164   218   8   10   (8 228  

  2014

 18,912   1,641   917   77   (288 55   761  

CRH’s share of after-tax profits of joint ventures and associated undertakings

* Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

The Group completed 45 acquisitions and investment transactions

LOGO

CRH      67


LOGO

Business Performance Review| continued

Other major movements in 2011 spending a total of610 million (2010:567 million). Details of the acquisitions completed during 2011 are set out in note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Proceeds (including net debt assumedduring the year comprised acquisition spend of €181 million on 21 transactions which was more than offset by purchasers)divestment and disposal proceeds of €345 million.

Cash dividend payments of €357 million and proceeds of €22 million from disposalexercise of non-current assetsshare options were similar to last year.

Year-end interest-bearing loans and businesses amountedborrowings increased by €0.3 billion to492 million (2010:188 million), reflecting €5.9 billion (2013: €5.5 billion). Net debt of €2.5 billion† at 31 December 2014 was €0.5 billion lower than year-end 2013. At year-end the divestment of our European Insulation and Climate Control businesses, Premier Periclase in Ireland and our 35% associate investment in the Trialis distribution business in France.

Exchange rate movements during 2011 increased the euro amount of net foreign currency debt by59 million principally due to the 3% strengthening in the year-end exchange rate of the US$stronger US Dollar (1.2141 versus the euro from 1.3362compared with 1.3791 at end-2010 to 1.2939 at end-2011.year-end 2013) was the main factor in the negative translation and mark-to-market impact of €181 million on net debt.

BorrowingsThe Group is in a strong financial position. It is well funded and Credit Facilities

An analysis of the components of net debt, together with information on the currency and maturity profile of our debt and on the interest rates applicable to that debt, are set out in notes 22 to 25 to the financial statements.

Year-end 2011 net debt of3.5 billion was in line with year-end 2010. Net debt/EBITDAcover (EBITDA (as defined)* improved to 2.1/Net Interest) of 6.7 times (2010: 2.2 times) and EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio foris significantly higher than the year was 6.4 times (2010: 6.5 times). 99% of the Group’s gross debt was term/bond debt or drawn under committed term facilities, 91% of which mature after more than one year.

In August 2011 CRH completed a new 5-year1.5 billion committed revolving facility provided by 13 international banks and cancelled0.6 billion of shorter-dated facilities. At year-end 2011, total undrawn committed bank facilities amounted to1.9 billion; this, together with cash and liquid investments of1.3 billion, leavesminimum requirements in the Group with significant liquidity at that date. Since year-end, the Group has issued500 million in 7-year Eurobonds at a coupon rate of 5%, the Group’s lowest ever coupon for a maturity greater than 5 years which hascovenant agreements – further enhanced the Group’s financial resources. CRH believes that its current facilities are sufficient to meet its capital expenditure and other expenditure requirements for 2012.

CRH remains committed to maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

Lender Covenants

The Group’s major bank facilities and debt issued pursuant to Note Purchase Agreements in private placements require the Group to maintain certain financial covenants, details of which are set out in note 23 to the financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

We successfully completed two bond issues during 2014: in July €600 million of 7-year euro bonds were issued with a coupon of 1.75% and in September we completed our first Swiss Franc bond issuance for a further CHF330 million of 8-year bonds with a coupon of 1.375% . These were the lowest-ever coupons obtained by the Group and reflect CRH’s commitment to managing debt and maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

The Group isremains in a very strong financial position with total liquidity at end 2014 of €5.9 billion comprising €3.3 billion of cash and cash equivalents on hand and €2.6 billion of committed undrawn facilities which do not aware of any stated events of default as defined inmature until 2019. These cash balances were enough to meet all maturing debt obligations for the Agreements asnext five years and the weighted average maturity of the balance sheet dateremaining term debt was eight years.

Significant Changes

On 1 February 2015, CRH announced that it had made a binding irrevocable offer to acquire certain businesses and assets of Lafarge S.A. (“Lafarge”) and Holcim Ltd (“Holcim”) for a total enterprise value of €6.5 billion. The proposed Acquisition is subject to: (i) CRH shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held on 19 March 2015; (ii) the successful completion of the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim; and (iii) the completion of certain local reorganisations by Lafarge and Holcim in advance of the acquisition.

The Board believes that this acquisition, which arises from the decision by Lafarge and Holcim to divest certain of their businesses and assets in order to obtain regulatory clearances necessary to complete their merger, represents a compelling strategic opportunity for CRH. The acquisition will be funded through a combination of €2 billion from existing cash resources, the proceeds of €1.6 billion from the placing, which completed on 5 February 2015, of 74,039,915 Ordinary Shares in CRH plc (which rank pari passu in all respects with the existing Ordinary Shares including the right to receive all future dividends declared or paid after the date of this Annual Report.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

As disclosed in note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, liquid investments and derivative financial instruments.

CRH    43


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

CRH does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have a, current or future effect on CRH’s financial condition, changesthe placing) and by new debt facilities in financial condition, revenues or expenses, resultsthe amount of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Contractual Obligations

An analysis of the maturity profile of debt, finance and operating leases, purchase obligations, deferred acquisition consideration and pension scheme contribution commitments at 31 December 2011 is as follows:

Payments due by period  Total
m
   Less than
1 year
m
   1-3 years
m
   3-5 years
m
   More
than
5 years
m
 

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings*

   4,710     511     1,484     1,645     1,070  

Finance leases

   25     3     6     3     13  

Estimated interest payments on contractually-committed debt and finance leases**

   1,377     287     478     280     332  

Deferred acquisition consideration

   151     28     64     30     29  

Operating leases

   1,250     251     368     247     384  

Purchase obligations

   293     248     33     7     5  

Retirement benefit obligation commitments††

   81     8     16     14     43  

Total

   7,887     1,336     2,449     2,226     1,876  

*Of the4.7 billion total gross debt,0.2 billion is drawn on revolving facilities which may be repaid and redrawn up to the date of maturity. The interest payments are estimated assuming these loans are repaid on facility maturity dates.

**These amounts have been estimated on the basis of the following assumptions: (i) no change in variable interest rates; (ii) no change in exchange rates; (iii) that all debt is repaid as if it falls due from future cash generation; and (iv) none is re-financed by future debt issuance.

Includes capital expenditure contracted for. A summary of the Group’s future purchase commitments as at 31 December 2011 for capital expenditure are set out in note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These expenditures for replacement and new projects are in the ordinary course of business and will be financed from internal resources.

††Represents the contracted payments related to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans.

Financial Risk Management

The Board of Directors sets the treasury policies and objectives of the Group, which include controls over the procedures used to manage financial market risks. Qualitative and quantitative information about management of market risks€2.9 billion. Further details are set out in detail belowon page 44 and in note 2133 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other than the events above, no significant changes have occurred since the balance sheet date.

Business Performance Reviews

The sections on pages 70 to 76 outline the scale of CRH’s business in 2014, and provide a more detailed review of performance in each of CRH’s six reporting segments.

Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Market Risk

The Group addresses the sensitivity of the Group’s interest rate swaps and debt obligations to changes in interest rates in a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the estimated impacts on the income statement and on equity of either an increase or decrease in market interest rates or a strengthening or weakening in the US Dollar against all other currencies, from the rates applicable at 31 December 2011,2014, for each class of financial instrument with all other variables remaining constant. The Group hastechnique used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the estimated impact on profit before tax in the Consolidated Income Statement and on total equity arising on net year-end floating rate debt and on year-end equity, based on either an increase/decrease of 1% and 0.5% in floating interest rates or a 5% and 2.5% strengthening/weakening in the US$//US$ exchange rate, from the rates applicable at 31 December 2011, with all other variables remaining constant.rate. The US$//US$ rate has been selected for this sensitivity analysis given the materiality of the Group’s activities in the United States. This analysis, set out in note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, is for illustrative purposes only as in practice interest and foreign exchange rates rarely change in isolation.

Quantitative and Qualitative information and sensitivity analysis of market risk is contained in notes 21-2520 to 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Significant Changes

Other than the Eurobond issue referred to in the “Borrowings and Credit Facilities” section on page 43 (see also note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), no significant changes have occurred since the balance sheet date.

44    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Segment Review

Europe Materials

2011 overview

Results 

%

Change

  

2011

  

2010

  

Total

Change

    Analysis of change 
million       Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  Restructuring  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  +12%    2,985    2,665    +320     +243    +110    -35    -    +2  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  +3%    436    423    +13     -18    +17    -1    +14    +1  

Operating profit

  +5%    264    251    +13     -13    +10    -    +14    +2  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      14.6%    15.9%            

Operating profit margin

      8.8%    9.4%            
Restructuring costs amounted to19 million (2010:33 million); no impairment charges were incurred (2010: nil)  

Like-for-like sales increased by 9% in 2011, with improved construction activity in the more stable European economies and stronger growth in the developing economies to the east more than offsetting declines in western and south-western Europe. With the benefit of contributions from acquisitions, profits were ahead of last year; however good improvements in pricing as the year progressed, together with greater alternative fuel usage, did not offset the impact of lower benefits from trading of CO2 allowances and margins declined. Excluding the impact of CO2 allowances (38 million in 2011 compared with67 million in 2010), underlying EBITDA (as defined)* increased by11 million for the year (and by33 million in the second half), EBITDA (as defined)* margin was stable and our operating profit margin improved.

2011 saw a further pick-up in acquisition activity with232 million spent on a total of 7 transactions, of which the most significant was the expansion of the Division’s activities in Benelux with the acquisition of VVM, a cement grinding and readymixed concrete business in Belgium. We continued to invest in our associate Yatai Building Materials as it expanded its presence in northeastern China. In 2011 we sold Premier Periclase, our Irish seawater magnesia operation.

Ireland, Portugal, Spain

In Ireland, activity again fell and cement volumes were 16% lower than 2010. Our cost and capacity reduction programmes continued during 2011. With lower restructuring charges operating losses reduced compared with 2010. In Portugal, activity levels, particularly in the public sector, fell steeply and cement volumes were 15% lower. Our 49% joint venture, Secil, was impacted by the reduced domestic construction activity, although prices improved and Secil maintained a high level of exports. Overall operating profit was down on 2010. In Spain, construction activity fell by a further 19% with declines across all sectors and results were lower than 2010.

Switzerland, Finland, Benelux

Construction activity in Switzerland remained robust in 2011; however, the strength of the Swiss Franc contributed to some pricing pressures in the second half of the year. With the help of acquisitions, volumes in both our cement and aggregates operations continued to be strong and operating profit improved. Construction output in Finland grew by almost 3%, led by increased activity in the residential sector. Non-residential construction recovered slightly, while infrastructure volumes were steady. Overall cement volumes increased by 14% and this, combined with good volumes in our downstream businesses, ongoing cost reduction programmes and increased use of alternatives fuels, led to increased operating profit. In the Benelux, our readymixed concrete and aggregates business benefited from higher volumes; in an increasingly competitive environment underlying operating profit was marginally ahead of 2010. VVM, acquired in August 2011, has traded in line with expectations.

 

*As disclosed in note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, and derivative financial instruments.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

68      CRH


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

CRH 45does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have a, current or future effect on CRH’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.


Business Review

 

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

 

 

Contractual Obligations

CentralAn analysis of the maturity profile of debt, finance and Eastern operating leases, purchase obligations, deferred and contingent acquisition consideration and pension scheme contribution commitments at 31 December 2014 is as follows:

 

  Contractual Obligations

 

                

  Payments due by period

 

  

Total
€m

 

  

Less than
1 year
€m

 

  

1-3 years
€m

 

  

3-5 years
€m

 

  

More than
5 years
€m

 

 

  Interest-bearing loans and borrowings1

 

   5,742    452    1,372    1,036    2,882  

  Finance leases

 

   13    2    4    3    4  

  Estimated interest payments on contractually-committed debt and finance leases2

 

   1,149    253    364    227    305  

  Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration

 

   207    59    118    16    14  

  Operating leases3

 

   1,390    310    414    249    417  

  Purchase obligations4

 

   263    226    30    3    4  

  Retirement benefit obligation commitments5

 

   154    26    49    31    48  

  Total

 

   8,918    1,328    2,351    1,565    3,674  

1      Of the €5.7 billion total gross debt, €0.1 billion is drawn on revolving facilities which may be repaid and redrawn up to the date of maturity. The interest payments are estimated assuming these loans are repaid on facility maturity dates.

2      These amounts have been estimated on the basis of the following assumptions: (i) no change in variable interest rates; (ii) no change in exchange rates; (iii) that all debt is repaid as if it falls due from future cash generation; and (iv) none is refinanced by future debt issuance.

3      Includes €54 million in relation to businesses classified as held for sale. See further details in note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

4      Includes contracted for capital expenditure. A summary of the Group’s future purchase commitments as at 31 December 2014 for capital expenditure are set out in note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These expenditures for replacement and new projects are in the ordinary course of business and will be financed from internal resources.

5      Represents the contracted payments related to our pension schemes in the United Kingdom and Ireland. This includes €65 million in relation to schemes reclassified as held for sale. See further details in note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

LOGO

CRH      69


LOGO

Europe Eastern Mediterranean, AsiaHeavyside

In Poland, construction activity was very strong particularly

 

 

Results

 

  

     

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

 

%

Change

 

  

2014

 

  

2013

 

  

Total

Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

Restructuring/

Impairment

 

  

Pension/

CO2 gains

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

  4%    3,929    3,786    143      105    51    -4    -    -    -9   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  17%    380    326    54      47    2    1    22    -11    -7   
 

Operating profit

  138%    151    -395    546      73    -2    1    489    -11    -4   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

  9.7%    8.6%               
 

Operating profit/sales

  

  3.8%    -10.4%               
 

 

No pension restructuring gains were recorded (2013: €12 million)

Gains from CO2trading amounted to €9 million (2013: €8 million)

  

 

 

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €15 million (2013: €37 million)

Impairment charges of €35 million were incurred (2013: €502 million)

 

  

  

 
    

The commentary below excludes the impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

Excellent weather conditions, especially in the first quarter, provided a platform for a like-for-like sales increase of 7% in the first six months. With sales marginally behind 2013 in the second half, ofoverall like-for-like sales for the year. Ouryear increased by 3%. The EBITDA (as defined)* margin improved significantly due to increased capacity utilisation, efficiency measures, cost savings and relatively stable input costs.

Western Europe

Sales increased by 4% in 2014 with double-digit growth in Ireland and the UK partly offset by declines in the Benelux and France. EBITDA (as defined)* increased significantly, mainly driven by excellent results in the UK.

With the residential construction market remaining strong in Switzerland, our cement volumes were up 16%, and aggregates and concrete volumes were also well8% ahead of 2010 mainly due2013, although we continued to completion of infrastructure projectsexperience price pressure. Prices in advance of the European football championship in mid-2012. Activity indownstream businesses were stable while volumes declined slightly. Overall operating profit declined. In the UK the residential market started to recover after tworemained very strong both for our clay and concrete businesses, and sales and operating profit increased during the year. There was a mixed outcome in the Benelux. While overall demand in the Netherlands was weak, years. Some price improvement was achieved which, combinedresulting in lower volumes for readymixed concrete and landscaping products, cement volumes remained in line with the increased volumes,prior year and in Belgium were better than in 2013. Both markets experienced significant price pressure and operating profit was lower than prior year. In Ireland an increase in residential activity in Dublin resulted in a significant improvementhigher volumes, however prices remained competitive due to overcapacity in the market. Overall operating profit was in line with 2013.

Construction output in France continued to decline and precast concrete volumes fell sharply resulting in lower operating profit. In Ukraine,Germany, volumes were higher in our concrete landscaping activity and prices remained under pressure; underlying operating profit was in line with 2013. Residential activity in Denmark improved, and although pricing remained difficult due to the overcapacity in the market; operating profit increased. In Spain, the decline in national cement volumes moderated, while volumes for our cement business in the Basque region were slightly ahead of 2013; overall operating profit was ahead of the 2013 outcome.

Eastern Europe

Our operations benefited from favourable weather at the start of the year, with like-for-like sales up 17%. Although clinker production from9% in the new kiln commencedfirst half. However, sales fell by 6% in the second half, results were affectedresulting in a marginal increase in like-for-like sales for the year overall. The slight improvement was achieved against a backdrop of political turmoil in Ukraine offset by improved demand in Poland. A relatively stable input cost environment, together with ongoing efficiency measures, resulted in an overall stable EBITDA (as defined)* margin.

Construction output in Poland increased by 5% in 2014, reflecting an early start to the higher running costs ofseason due to very mild weather in the old plantfirst quarter, stronger economic growth and a pick-up in the overall operating result was lower. In Turkey, while domesticpreviously sluggish residential sector. National cement volumes for our 50% joint venture in the Aegean regionyear increased by 20% compared with 2010, export6%. Our readymixed concrete and landscaping volumes fell, resultingalso increased. While prices for many of our products remained under pressure, operating profit in a total net volume increasePoland increased due to strong volumes and the benefit of 7%. Operating profit was higher than 2010. In southern India, market demand weakened across our 50% cement joint venture’s core markets; however, price improvements delivered higher operating profit. In China, further growthpreviously implemented cost-reduction programmes. Despite the uncertain political backdrop in construction, driven primarily by improved residential activityUkraine and a 13% reduction in national construction output, our like-for-like cement volumes were only down 1% on 2013 reflecting the concentration of our plants in western Ukraine and the ongoing commitment and dedication of our Ukrainian-based team. Due to better pricing, continued roll-out of major infrastructure projects, saw cement demand grow by over 10% in the northeastern region, where our wholly-owned and 26% associate operations are located. In this environment, volumes, selling prices and profitability moved ahead strongly.

Outlook - Europe Materials

The outlook remains challenging for Ireland, Portugal and Spain. However, capacity reduction,focus on cost efficiencies and improved usethe full-year benefit of alternative fuels should help our businesses to maintain margins. We expectthe acquisition of Mykolaiv, operating profit in local currency was ahead of 2013. Construction output in Finland remained relatively weak in 2014 mainly as a modestresult of a continuing decline in overallhousing starts and a 2% drop in our cement volumes. Volumes and prices in readymixed concrete and aggregates were also under pressure and operating profit was below 2013. Sales and operating profit were ahead in 2014 in our concrete products operations in Romania, Hungary and Slovakia as a result of improved activity.

Outlook

Western Europe: In the Netherlands we expect to see further improvements in the residential sector, which should have a positive impact in 2015, while the non-residential and infrastructure sectors are expected to improve marginally. In Switzerland construction activity in Switzerland, Finland and the Benelux. The pace of construction demand in Poland and Ukraine should be robust in the run up to the EURO 2012 football championship while a full year’s contribution from our new cement plant in Ukraine will result in cost efficiencies and improved margins. Cement demand is expected to continuedecline slightly but remain on a relatively high level with some improvement from larger infrastructure (tunnel) projects, which are expected to grow in both of our Asian markets, albeit at a slower rate as tighter government fiscal strategy impacts the level of construction activity.

Americas Materials

2011 overview

Results               Analysis of change 
million 

%

Change

  2011  2010  

Total

Change

    Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  Restructuring  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  -    4,395    4,417    -22     +59    +130    -    -    -211  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -6%    530    566    -36     -37    +20    -    +8    -27  

Operating profit

  -8%    264    288    -24     -28    +10    -    +8    -14  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      12.1%    12.8%            

Operating profit margin

      6.0%    6.5%            
Restructuring costs were9 million (2010:17 million); no impairment charges were incurred (2010: nil)  

While sales revenue remained stable, energy cost increases and pricing pressures presented considerable challenges throughout 2011. Aggressive actions to reduce variable and fixed costs moderated the decline in operating profit. Overall US Dollar EBITDA (as defined)* was 2% lower than 2010 with operating profit down 4%.

Americas Materials completed 19 acquisitions in 2011 with a total spend of218 million, adding 23 quarries (538 million tonnes of reserves), 13 asphalt plants and 9 readymixed concrete plants with annual production of 5.5 million tonnes of aggregates, 1.6 million tonnes of asphalt and 0.3 million cubic metres of readymixed concrete.

Energy and Other Costs

The price of bitumen, a key component of asphalt mix, rose by 14% in 2011 following a similar increase in 2010. Prices of diesel and gasoline, important inputs to aggregates, readymixed concrete and paving

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

46    CRH


Business Review

 

70      CRH


commence in 2015. The outlook for construction output in Belgium is flat. Ireland should continue to grow with overall construction activity mainly driven by the residential segment. France is expected to decline further especially in the infrastructure sector. The outlook for Germany and Denmark is positive, but showing only modest growth. Spain remains challenging and we expect that 2014 was the bottom of the cycle, with moderate improvements anticipated in 2015.

BUSINESS REVIEW -Eastern Europe:Current Year The growth in activity in Poland during 2014 is expected to continue to be led by a pick-up in road programme activity in the second half of 2015. The outlook for Ukraine is uncertain; we expect construction activity to decline, and the local currency is expected to remain very weak. The outlook remains challenging for Finland, although with the benefits of cost efficiencies we expect to improve margins. Further growth is expected in Romania, Hungary and Slovakia.

 

 

Europe Lightside

 

 

Results

 

  

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

    

%
Change

 

     

2014

 

     

2013

 

     

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Pensions

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

     7%       913       856       57      53    -    -    -    4   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

     32%       94       71       23      22    -    1    -1    1   
 

Operating profit

     154%       71       28       43      31    -    14    -1    -1   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

     10.3%       8.3%                 
 

Operating profit/sales

  

     7.8%       3.3%                 
    Restructuring costs amounted to €5 million (2013: €6 million)   
 

No pension restructuring gains were recorded (2013: €1 million)

 

  

    No impairment charges were recorded (2013: €13 million)   

The commentary below excludes the impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

2014 saw good progress for Europe Lightside, with our portfolio of businesses benefiting from mild weather early in the year. Like-for-like sales were 6% ahead of 2013, helped by good export levels to markets outside of Europe. Market demand in the Netherlands and France remained weak, while activity in Germany, Belgium and Switzerland was more resilient. The UK experienced robust growth, particularly in residential construction. With the benefit of new product innovation, market share gains and cost reduction initiatives, the Division achieved substantial growth in both EBITDA (as defined)* and operating profit margins.

Construction Accessories

This division supplies a broad range of connecting, fixing and anchor systems to the construction industry. Like-for-like sales grew by almost 6% in 2014, with a significant increase in operating profit.Engineered Accessories benefited from new product innovation and previous restructuring initiatives. Our businesses in Germany and the UK delivered strong growth in operating profits, while Switzerland also performed well. The more commodity-focussedBuilding Site Accessories businesses had a mixed year, with better performances in the UK, Belgium and Spain offset by rationalisation costs and more difficult trading conditions in Germany and France.

Shutters & Awnings

Our operations in this division serve the attractive RMI and residential end-use markets, supplying sun protection, energy-

saving, and outdoor living technologies. The Netherlands business benefited from the introduction of innovative new products with strong margins. The UK business also delivered improved sales and margins. In Germany, strong demand for our awnings products was offset by a weaker performance in the shutters business due to lower exports to France and restructuring measures. Overall, like-for-like sales and operating profits increased.

Fencing & Cubis

OurPermanent Fencing business again experienced difficult markets, especially in the Netherlands, although a number of initiatives contributed to improved sales and operating profits. Despite challenging market conditions, results forMobile Fencing were only slightly lower year-on-year, as a result of various operational excellence measures.Cubis, our composite access chamber business, had another good year in which sales and operating profits increased due to strong UK demand and the introduction of a range of new products.

Outlook

While we are positive about the UK and Switzerland in 2015, we expect France to remain challenging, and are cautious about the outlook for Germany and the Netherlands. Given Europe Lightside’s robust business mix, we anticipate further organic growth in 2015, achieved through new products, maximising export opportunities and a continued RMI focus. This growth, combined with commercial and operational excellence programmes, is expected to deliver further improvement in our operating profit in the year ahead.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      71


LOGO

Europe Distribution

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

    

%
Change

 

     

2014

 

     

2013

 

     

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

 

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Pensions

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

     2%       3,999       3,936       63      7    41    -    -    15   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

     2%       190       186       4      15    -    -    -11    -   
 

Operating profit

     6%       112       106       6      14    -1    4    -11    -   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

     4.8%       4.7%                 
 

Operating profit/sales

  

     2.8%       2.7%                 
 

No pension restructuring gains were recorded (2013: €11 million)

 

  

  Restructuring costs amounted to €4 million (2013: €4 million)

No impairment charges were recorded (2013: €4 million)

 

  

  

 

 

With the benefit of mild weather in the early months of 2014, first-half like-for-like sales increased by 30%4%. Although the Netherlands saw some recovery in consumer confidence as the year progressed, financing conditions remained tight; our other key markets, particularly Switzerland, France and 28%Germany, experienced more subdued demand and intense competition. While sales in the third quarter declined by 4% on a like-for-like basis, by December activity had flattened to a level similar to last year, resulting in a full-year like-for-like sales outturn that was broadly similar to 2013. With the benefit of procurement and other commercial excellence initiatives, and in spite of the absence in 2014 of the once-off pension gain of €11 million reported in 2013, overall operating profit and margin was ahead of last year.

Six builders merchants acquisitions were completed in 2014 at a total cost of €27 million. In the Benelux, we acquired seven branches mainly to expand our footprint in our growing builders merchants platform in Belgium. We also acquired two branches in northern France, strengthening our network in Normandy.

Professional Builders Merchants

Overall operating profit for our wholly-owned professional builders merchants business, which operates 343 branches in six countries, was ahead of 2013. Mild first-quarter weather together with the incremental contribution from acquisitions offset weaker demand as the year progressed, resulting in full-year sales in line with the previous year. Operating profit advanced mainly due to procurement initiatives in the Benelux and France and ERP optimisation in Austria. Sales in the Benelux ended slightly ahead of 2013 due mainly to our recent Belgian acquisitions with operating profit well ahead as a result of procurement and cost savings initiatives. In Switzerland, sales finished slightly behind 2013, with the main driver for lower sales being a softening of local residential markets in particular; operating profit was impacted by lower volumes and pricing pressure partly coming from the strong Swiss Franc. Our builders merchants activities in Germany made a strong start to the year in mild weather; this moderated as the year progressed leaving full-year sales and operating profit slightly ahead of prior year. Sales in France were slightly ahead of 2013 due to acquisition contributions, while operating profit improved following a continued focus on pricing, purchasing and cost control. Sales levels in Austria were slightly behind 2013, although operating profit was ahead due to measures taken to leverage the recently implemented ERP system.

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (“SHAP”)

Sales in our SHAP business, which operates 132 branches, were ahead of 2013 due to an organic improvement in our Belgian businesses which continue to perform strongly. Sales in our German business moderated in the second half, finishing broadly in line with prior year. Due to the challenging market conditions in Switzerland, results were lower compared with 2013. Underlying operating profit for our SHAP activities in 2014 was broadly in line with 2013 as organic improvement in Belgium was offset by weaker Swiss results.

DIY

Our wholly-owned DIY business operates 184 stores in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Similar to our other businesses, DIY made a strong start to 2014 with garden sales in particular benefiting from mild weather conditions. Despite improving consumer confidence and mild weather, competition remained intense in the Dutch market with high levels of price discounting featuring prominently during the year. Overall sales ended broadly in line with 2013 in both the Netherlands and Belgium. Sales in our DIY business in Germany were higher than the previous year in part due to recent greenfield investments. Overall operating profit for the DIY business was ahead of the prior year with weaker pricing in the Netherlands more than offset by cost savings initiatives, lower restructuring costs and a good performance in our German DIY business.

Outlook

While the Dutch economy continues to show progress, as seen in improving consumer confidence indicators, underlying financing conditions remain somewhat constrained and therefore we expect measured progress in 2015. The German market outlook remains broadly positive despite some moderation in economic growth. Markets in Austria are expected to be flat in 2015. In Switzerland, consistent with recent Euroconstruct indicators, residential markets in particular are expected to be subdued, so we remain cautious for 2015. Construction activity in France is also expected to be constrained in the near term. Overall 2015 is likely to be another challenging year, but we expect improved operating profit due mainly to further initiatives in commercial and operational excellence programmes and our continued focus on cost-reduction measures.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

72      CRH


Americas Materials

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

    

 

%
Change

 

     

2014

 

     

2013

 

     

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

     7%       5,070       4,721       349      317    37    -2    -    -3   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

     9%       609       557       52      42    7    -    3    -   
 

Operating profit

     57%       355       226       129      61    5    -    63    -   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

     12.0%       11.8%                 
 

Operating profit/sales

  

     7.0%       4.8%                 
     

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €9 million (2013: €12 million)

No impairment charges were recorded (2013: €60 million)

 

  

  

 

 

The commentary below excludes the impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

After the early months of 2014 which were impacted by harsh winter weather, trading conditions improved as the year progressed, led by improved residential and non-residential segments and stable infrastructure. Americas Materials delivered another year of growth, with like-for-like sales revenues growing 7% and overall EBITDA (as defined)* increasing 9% compared to 2013. Positive trends in pricing continued for the third year in a row for aggregates and readymixed concrete, with asphalt pricing also improving in 2014.

Americas Materials completed eight acquisition transactions in 2014 at a total cost of €91 million, adding over 230 million tonnes of aggregates reserves, 2 operating quarries, 6 asphalt plants and 2 aggregates terminals, with annual production of 4.3 million tonnes of aggregates and 0.2 million tonnes of asphalt. In addition divestments during the year generated proceeds of €12 million.

Energy and related costs: The price of bitumen, a key component of asphalt mix, increased by 3% in 2014 following a 4% decrease in 2013. Prices for diesel and gasoline, important inputs to aggregates, readymixed concrete and paving operations, decreased by 2% and 3% respectively. The price of energy used at our asphalt plants, consisting of fuel oil, recycled oil, electricity and natural gas, increased by 19%. As a result, energy costs as a proportionremained flat. Recycled asphalt and shingles accounted for approximately 22% of sales rose by over two percentage points. Against this backdrop and with ongoing competitive pressures, we continued to improve efficiency, reduce cost, increase the use of recycled materials, and raise quality and service levels to customers while maintaining price discipline. As a result, our overall margin decline was limited to less than one percentage point.total asphalt requirements in 2014, lessening demand on virgin bitumen.

Aggregates

Aggregates:Like-for-like volumes increased by 4%, with6% from 2013 while total aggregates volumes including acquisitions upincreased 10%. Volume gains were driven primarily by an increase in sales of lower value materials on a number of large projects. Accordingly, average like-for-likeAverage prices fell by 1% reflecting the lower value product mix. Operating profit improved as gains in efficiency more than offset higher energy costs, resulting in a 2% reduction in unit production costs.

Asphalt

Like-for-like volumes were 1% lower than in 2010. Including acquisitions, volumes were flat. Unit cost increased 8% with higher bitumen and burner fuel cost more than offsetting the benefit of greater recycled asphalt usage. Challenging trading conditions limited our like-for-like asphalt price increase to 5% and accordingly our overall margin for this business declined.

Readymixed Concrete

Volumes increased by 10% on a like-for-like basis with total volume including acquisitions up 13%. In a very competitive environment average prices declined by 1%2% on a like-for-like basis and 1% overall compared with 2013. These price and volume increases, together with efficient cost control, resulted in improved margin for our aggregates business.

Asphalt: Volumes increased 5% on a like-for-like basis and 6% overall compared to 2013. Volume increases together with pricing increases of 1% increase in unit cost, margins declined. With bettercontributed to an overall asphalt margin expansion.

Readymixed Concrete: Like-for-like volumes however, profitability was similarincreased 6% while total volumes including acquisitions were up 7% compared with 2013. Average prices increased 4% on both a like-for-like and an overall basis, contributing to last year.margin expansion for this business.

Paving and Construction Services

WhileServices: With flat federal funding and pockets of increased state infrastructure spending, like-for-like sales revenue remained broadly unchanged, margins were lower dueincreased 2% and overall sales including acquisitions increased 3%. Bidding continued to continued severe competition for infrastructure projects and rising input and energy costs.be under pressure in a competitive environment. However, efficient cost controls enabled overall margin to improve by 0.5% in 2014.

Regional Performance

East

The East region comprisingcomprises operations in 2223 states, is organised into four divisions; the most important states in the regionof which are Ohio, New York, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. After a harsh winter, the Northeast division was able to take advantage of favourable weather and improving economic conditions during the remainder of the year with operating profit growing strongly compared with 2013. Operating profit was more stable in the Mid-Atlantic and Central divisions where very wet conditions hampered activity in the peak production months. The strong residential and non-residential markets in Florida contributed to higher volumes, better prices and margin growth in the Southeast division. Overall operating profit for the East region was higher than in 2013, with overall volumes 7%, 6% and 5% ahead of prior year for aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete respectively.

West

The West region has operations in 21 states, the most important of which are Utah, Texas, Washington, Iowa, Kansas and Colorado. All three divisions, Central West, Northwest, and Mountain West reported higher operating profit. Early season earnings improvements throughout the West continued into the autumn and early winter, with modest price gains building on strong operating and overhead cost management across the product lines. Recovery in construction margins provided very positive year-on-year improvements from this line of business. Overall West volumes increased 15%, 4% and 9% ahead of 2013 for aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete respectively.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      73


LOGO

Americas Materials |continued

Outlook

We expect that US GDP growth in 2015 will be similar to 2014 and that housing will continue to recover. We also expect non-residential construction to show modest gains. Federal funding for infrastructure is expected to be flat in 2015. A more robust federal highway bill is being explored by Congress and has the support of the President, but if passed the impact would most likely be evident in 2016 and beyond. State fiscal conditions are improving with certain states passing infrastructure funding measures.

We expect 2015 volumes for aggregates and asphalt to show single-digit growth and readymixed concrete volumes to be up slightly

more due to improving residential markets. Targeted price increases in all product lines, combined with cost controls and stable/improving energy markets are expected to lead to another year of margin expansion in 2015.

Americas Products

 

Results

 

  

    

 

Analysis of change

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

    

 

%
Change

 

     

2014

 

     

2013

 

     

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

     5%       3,225       3,068       157      169    75    -19    -    -68   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

     7%       263       246       17      24    6    -1    -7    -5   
 

Operating profit

     113%       145       68       77      24    2    -    50    1   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

     8.2%       8.0%                 
 

Operating profit/sales

  

     4.5%       2.2%                 
   Restructuring costs amounted to €18 million (2013: €11 million)

Impairment charges of €14 million were incurred (2013: €71 million)

 

  

  

 

 

The commentary below excludes the impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

Our Products business in the Americas is located primarily in the United States but also in Canada, Mexico and South America. Construction activity in the eastern and northern parts of North America was hampered by unseasonably wintry weather into May. Good weather in the second half of the year and an ongoing pick-up in US macroeconomic fundamentals, particularly stronger labour markets and consumer confidence, led to improved trading results in the remainder of the year. Overall like-for-like sales increased by 6%. With improving market conditions, input cost pressures accelerated but were more than offset by the effects of improved operational efficiencies and targeted price increases. Combined with the benefits of organic growth, cost reduction initiatives and contributions from acquisitions, Americas Products achieved a 7% increase in EBITDA (as defined)* and improved margins.

Five bolt-on acquisitions were completed in 2014 at a total spend of €60 million. The acquisition by our Architectural Products Group (“APG”) of Hope Agri Products, a supplier of packaged mulches and soils, extended our footprint into the growing Texas market; while five divestments in 2014 generated net proceeds of €50 million.

Architectural Products

APG is a leading supplier of masonry and hardscape products, packaged lawn and garden products, clay brick and fencing solutions. In addition to contractor-based new construction, the DIY and professional RMI segments are significant end-users. The business benefited from improving private residential and non-residential construction and increasing RMI spend. In general, activity was more robust in the West and South, while trading in the Midwest, Northeast, and Eastern Canada started slowly during the first four months due to unseasonably bad weather. The strengthening housing market, together with product innovation and commercial initiatives, drove gains across nearly all business segments resulting in a 7% increase in like-for-like sales compared with 2013. While our markets remain competitive, the combination of cost reduction measures and selected price improvements broadly offset the impact of higher input costs. Overall, APG recorded strong improvements in operating profit and margin for the year.

Precast

The Precast group manufactures a broad range of value-added concrete and polymer-based products primarily for utility

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

74      CRH


infrastructure applications. In addition, the business is a leading manufacturer of accessories to the concrete construction industry. While public infrastructure spend remained subdued, the business saw an otherwise improved market environment in 2014 and registered solid sales gains as growth initiatives continued to deliver. Operating profit increases were achieved in most precast markets although selected areas were slow to recover from the weather-impacted start to the year. Our utility enclosures and construction accessories businesses also continued to grow and improve. Overall, like-for-like sales rose by 5%, operating profit was marginally ahead and backlogs continued to improve.

BuildingEnvelope®

The BuildingEnvelope® group is North America’s leading supplier of architectural glass and aluminium glazing systems that close the building envelope. New non-residential building activity, a key market segment for this business, experienced improved market conditions and healthy increases in demand in 2014. Sales growth was also driven by ongoing initiatives to gain market share and differentiate the business through innovative product and technology offerings. Organic sales rose 2%, slightly less than the overall market, as our Engineered Glazing Systems (“EGS”) division

concentrated on completing existing major project work. The Architectural Glass and Storefront division continued to benefit from an improved pricing environment, resilient non-residential RMI activity and a generally more favourable product mix. With a tight focus on cost control, product quality and improved processes, the business delivered operating profit and margin improvements.

South America

Our South American operations were negatively impacted by challenging economic conditions and operating profit was lower than 2010.in 2013. Slow economic growth and high inflation led to lower volumes and higher operating costs in the Argentine clay products businesses. Our Chilean business also recorded reduced profits due to soft demand in a very competitive market.

Outlook

Based on the improving macroeconomic backdrop, which will benefit both residential and non-residential construction demand, we expect further organic sales growth in 2015. Combined with the impact of 2014 acquisitions and divestments, and the benefits of internal growth and cost initiatives, we expect to record improved operating profit and margin in 2015.

Americas Distribution

 

Results

 

  

    

 

Analysis of change

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

    

 

%
Change

 

     

2014

 

     

2013

 

     

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Restructuring

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

     7%       1,776       1,664       112      80    33    -    -1   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

     18%       105       89       16      14    1    1    -   
 

Operating profit

     24%       83       67       16      15    -    1    -   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

            5.9%       5.3%                
 

Operating profit/sales

            4.7%       4.0%                
   No restructuring costs were recorded (2013: €1 million)

 

  

 

 

Americas Distribution, trading as Allied Building Products (“Allied”), experienced improved performance across its activities in 2014, leading to strong overall reported results. Both business divisions benefited from sales growth providing increased operating profit compared to 2013. Performance in our Mid-Atlantic divisionExterior Products business was led by strong demand in our Midwest (Chicago) and Mountain (Colorado) markets aided by early storm activity. The Northeast and West Coast markets experienced modest setbacks due to the completion of Hurricane Sandy rebuilding efforts in New York/New Jersey and exceptionally dry and drought-like weather patterns experienced in California.

The Interior Products business continued to show growth as both volumes and pricing improved throughout the year. The strongest gains were experienced in our Atlantic markets, in part due to the full-year effect of our prior year acquisitions, and also the

Southwest and West markets which were driven by multi-family construction.

In 2014, Allied management maintained its focus on improving employee safety, controlling variable costs, streamlining administrative procedures and eliminating redundant processes. The simplification of our business processes, along with the ongoing evolution of our organisational structure and go-to-market strategies, is aimed at improving business integration and enhancing operating leverage, allowing for greater economies of scale as our business, and the overall market, grows.

While no acquisitions were completed within the Americas Distribution group in 2014, we have continued to build on our organic greenfield and service centre strategy by opening six bolt-on locations within some of our key existing markets. Our service

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      75


LOGO

Americas Distribution |continued

centre model enables us to improve customer service, consolidate fixed costs and more efficiently leverage branch assets. Progress continued to be made in 2014 to increase brand awareness ofTri-Built, our proprietary private label brand, as both sales and product offerings grew. The addition of our new service centre locations combined with the continued growth of our Tri-Built private label brand and our commitment to developing our people continued to differentiate Allied in the marketplace.

Exterior Products

The Exterior Products business is largely comprised of both commercial and residential roofing, siding and related products, and is the third largest distributor in the United States. Exterior Products demand is greatly influenced by residential and commercial replacement activity (75% of sales volume is RMI-related). Commercial roofing experienced modest industry-wide growth while residential roofing shipments saw a slight decline leading to an overall flat market from 2013. As a result, product mix shifted more towards lower-margin commercial products. Additionally, with no volume growth, markets across the industry remained very competitive leading to pricing pressure in all regions. In spite of flat market conditions and the pressures mentioned above, the Exterior Products division reported modest sales growth and operating profit just slightly behind prior year.

Interior Products

The Interior Products business, which is the third largest specialty distributor in the United States, sells gypsum wallboard, acoustical ceiling systems and related products to specialised contractors. The primary market is new construction including residential, multi-family and commercial, with limited exposure to the repair and remodel market. Performance in this business was strong in 2011. Despiteall markets with increased volumes and prices of core products contributing to higher sales and improved operating margins. In addition, a more favourable mix toward higher-margin core products combined with efficiency initiatives implemented in recent years, helped to drive improved sales and operating profit for 2014.

Outlook

The overall outlook for 2015 is encouraging as commercial and residential construction is expected to grow. While headwinds are expected to continue in our Exterior Products business, as pricing pressures remain and only modest growth is expected, our Interior Products business continues to experience favourable markets, with another year of sales and profit growth expected. Overall, the expected benefits of the six service centre additions in 2014 combined with our continued focus on efficiency and cost control should provide a year of further improvement in operating performance in 2015.

76      CRH


Business Performance Review – Prior Year

Trading conditions in 2013 proved challenging, especially in the first half of the year, and the Group continued to focus on cash generation finishing the year in a strong and flexible financial position. With increased cash inflows from operations and proceeds from disposals, net debt at year-end 2013 remained broadly in line with 2012 despite a total spend of €1.2 billion on acquisitions, investments and capital expenditure and cash dividend payments which at €368 million were similar to 2012.

While reported sales for 2013 were similar to 2012, organic sales from underlying operations fell by 2%, reflecting difficult market conditions in Europe and poor weather across the Group in the first half.

In Europe the decline in like-for-like sales moderated to less than 1% in the second half of 2013, a significant improvement on the weather-impacted decline of 10% in the first half. This resulted in a full-year reduction of 5% in underlying European sales in 2013, which was partly offset by contributions from acquisitions to give a 3% overall decline. Lower sales impacted EBITDA (as defined)* margin, which despite intense management focus and internal actions, fell in all European segments in response to competitive market pressures.

Against an improving backdrop as 2013 progressed, like-for-like sales in the Americas were up 5% in the second half, compared with a first half which saw organic volumes down by 1%. In our Materials business, which was impacted by unfavourable weather patterns in the early part of 2013, like-for-like sales were 3% lower than 2012; however, with good contributions from

acquisitions overall US Dollar sales revenue was in line with 2012. Our Products and Distribution businesses continued to benefit from improving demand, particularly from new residential construction, and like-for-like sales were 8% ahead of 2012. With higher sales and good cost control, EBITDA (as defined)* margins improved in all three Americas segments.

Operating profit fell significantly from 2012, due principally to the non-cash impairment charge of €650 million taken largely as a result of the comprehensive portfolio review in 2013. The initial phase of this review identified business units that would not meet our returns criteria, and an orderly disposal process is underway. The Europe segment accounted for the majority of the write-down. The portfolio review also identified further impairments of €105 million in respect of equity accounted investments.

During 2013 the euro strengthened by more than 3% against the US Dollar, resulting in an adverse translation impact on the Group’s results; this is the principal factor behind the exchange effects shown in the table below.

We continued to advance the significant cost-reduction initiatives which have been progressively implemented since 2007 and which by year-end 2013 had generated cumulative annualised savings of almost €2.4 billion. Total restructuring costs associated with these initiatives (which generated savings of €195 million in 2013) amounted to €71 million in 2013 (2012: €60 million) and were once again heavily focussed in our European Divisions.

 

  Key Components of 2013 Performance

 

       

  € million

 

Revenue

 

 

EBITDA
(as defined)*

 

 

Operating
profit

 

 

Profit on
disposals

 

 

Finance
costs (net)

 

 

Equity
accounted
investments

 

 

Pre-tax
profit/(loss)

 

 

  2012

 18,084   1,563   805   230   (305 (84 646  

  Exchange effects

 (404 (36 (19 (1 5   (2 (17

  2012 at 2013 exchange rates

 17,680   1,527   786   229   (300 (86 629  

  Incremental impact in 2013 of:

                     

  - 2013 and 2012 acquisitions

 672   73   43   -   (3 3   43  

  - 2013 and 2012 divestments

 (42 -   2   (191 (2 4   (187

  - Restructuring costs

 -   (11 (11 -   -   -   (11

  - Pension/CO2 gains

 -   (29 (29 -   -   -   (29

  - Impairment charges

 -   -   (622 -   -   41   (581

  Ongoing operations

 (279 (85 (69 (12 8   (6 (79

  2013

 18,031   1,475   100   26   (297 (44 (215

     CRH’s share of after-tax profits of joint ventures and associated undertakings

 

       

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      77


LOGO

Business Performance Review – Prior Year |continued

Liquidity and Capital Resources – 2013 compared with 2012

The comments that follow refer to the major components of the Group’s cash flows as shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on page 138.

Throughout 2013 the Group continued to keep a very sharp focus on cash management, targeting in particular working capital and capital expenditure. Year-end 2013 current working capital of €2.0 billion represented just 11.2% of sales, an improvement compared with year-end 2012 (11.5%). This performance delivered net inflows for 2013 of €77 million (2012: outflows of €58 million). Strong control of spending on property, plant and equipment resulted in lower cash outflows of €497 million (2012: €544 million), with spend in 2013 representing 74% of depreciation (2012: 79%).

Other major cash flow movements during 2013 comprised acquisition spend of €676 million on 28 transactions, including €144 million in respect of the asset exchange in Spain which is also included in the total proceeds from disposals and investments of €266 million.

Cash dividend payments of €368 million and proceeds of €19 million from exercise of share options were very similar to 2012.

Year-end 2013 interest-bearing loans and borrowings increased by €0.7 billion to €5.5 billion (2012: €4.8 billion). At year-end 2013, net debt of €2.97 million† was just €64 million higher than year-end 2012. The weaker US Dollar (1.3791 versus the euro at year-end 2013 compared with 1.3194 at year-end 2012) was the main factor in the positive translation and mark-to-market impact of €87 million on net debt.

CRH’s share price increased by 20% in 2013 to €18.30 at year-end; combined with the maintained dividend of 62.5c, shareholder returns were 24% in 2013 and resulted in net debt as a % of market capitalisation decreasing to 22% (2012: 26%).

As disclosed in note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, and derivative financial instruments.

78      CRH


Europe Heavyside – 2013

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

 

%
Change

 

  

2013

 

  

2012

 

  

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

 

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Pension/
CO
2 gains

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

  -5%    3,786    3,972    -186      -258    +125    -8    -    -    -45   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -23%    326    426    -100      -61    +9    +1    -2    -41    -6   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

  8.6%    10.7%                                 
 

Operating profit

  n/m    -395    187    582      -58    +1    +3    -483    -41    -4   
 

Pension restructuring gains amounted to €12 million (2012: €30 million)

Gains from CO2trading were €8 million (2012: €31 million)

 

   

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €37 million (2012: €35 million)

Impairment charges of €502 million were incurred (2012: €21 million)

 

  

  

 

 

EBITDA (as defined)* above includes pension restructuring gains and gains from CO2 trading. Operating profit is also stated after impairment charges; the net €482 million adverse impact of these items has been excluded from the commentary that follows.

Adverse weather in the first half of 2013, combined with significant overcapacity in very competitive markets, resulted in like-for-like sales for the year overall being down by 7% versus 2012. Our cement operations experienced weak volumes in Poland, Finland and Benelux, in particular, combined with further, albeit more modest, declines in construction activity in Ireland. The UK market was the only major market showing growth in 2013, benefiting from strong residential markets. However, our continued cost reduction and efficiency measures partly offset the impact of lower demand. Overall, EBITDA (as defined)* margin excluding pensions and CO2 gains was 8.1% compared with 9.2% in 2012.

On the development front during 2013, we concluded an asset swap in February in which we acquired Cementos Lemona in the Basque region in Spain in exchange for our 26% stake in Corporacion Uniland. In September 2013 we became the market leader in Ukraine through the acquisition of Mykolaiv Cement. We completed two smaller transactions in 2013 strengthening our presence in Northern Ireland and expanding our network of cement import facilities in Britain. In addition, we acquired a manufacturer of pre-stressed hollow core elements in Belgium, expanding and strengthening our position as market leader in Belgium’s pre-stressed hollow core flooring segment.

Western Europe

Construction spend in Switzerland increased again in 2013 with the residential market remaining one of the major drivers of activity and infrastructure spend continuing weakat good levels. With the benefit of mild weather in the fourth quarter of 2013, construction remained strong to the end of the year. Our cement volumes were 12% higher than 2012 benefiting both from increased infrastructure projects and large individual projects. Aggregates and readymixed concrete volumes continued the slightly upward trend of recent years. Sales prices, particularly cement, saw some slippage in 2013 due to the continued strong Swiss Franc. Operating profit was ahead of 2012. New residential markets in the Southeast,UK experienced significant growth due to the government’s “Help to Buy” scheme and industry brick volumes finished 9% ahead of 2012. Selling price increases were

also achieved and, despite higher natural gas costs, operating resultprofit was higher than 2010 asahead of 2012. Our clay businesses in the Netherlands were impacted by weaker residential demand in very competitive markets, with volumes and prices under pressure. In 2013, we decided to close part of our clay business in the Netherlands, contributing to the overall increase in restructuring initiatives positivelycharges compared with 2012. Operating results for our Clay business overall were broadly in line with 2012. Our cement and readymixed concrete businesses in the Netherlands and Belgium were impacted performance. Operatingby falling construction activity in 2013. Lower volumes, together with pricing pressure in very competitive markets, resulted in lower operating profit in spite of the benefits from ongoing cost reduction programmes. Profitability in our NortheastStructural Concrete business in the Benelux was in line with 2012 with lower organic results offset by the contribution from the acquisition during 2013. Our operations in Denmark, Germany and Central divisionsFrance all saw weaker activity levels in 2013. The decline in construction activity in Ireland moderated in 2013 and cement volumes were similar to 2012 levels. With a lower cost base, operating losses declined. In Spain, while construction activity fell by a further 23% with declines across all sectors, our like-for-like results were in line with 2012 due to the benefit of previously-implemented cost reduction programmes. Trading in our newly-acquired cement business Cementos Lemona was in line with expectations.

Eastern Europe

A pick-up in second-half construction activity in Poland was insufficient to offset the weather-impacted first half of 2013; national construction output fell by an estimated 11% in 2013 and cement volumes fell 9%. The residential sector remained sluggish throughout 2013 with new starts down over 11%. Infrastructure activity picked up as the year progressed and the second half of 2013 saw the restart of a number of stalled projects. Mild weather late in 2013 enabled construction to continue until year-end. Against the improving backdrop our second-half cement volumes increased by 8% compared with 2012, reducing the decline in our full-year 2013 volumes to 11%. Our aggregates and readymixed concrete volumes also declined year-on-year. Prices for all products remained under pressure in very competitive markets, and overall operating profit in Poland was lower than 2012. In Ukraine, while the first half of 2013 was negatively impacted by the prolonged winter conditions, demand was much stronger in the second half

* Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      79


LOGO

Europe Heavyside – Prior Year |continued

and national cement volumes for the year were down 3% compared with 2012. Our like-for-like volumes were 13% ahead of 2012 in the second half of 2013, bringing our full-year volumes almost in line with 2012 (down 1%) and overall operating profit in Ukraine was broadly similar to 2012.

In Finland, construction spend was down in 2013 mainly due to reduced residential activity. The government introduced two stimulus packages related mainly to the residential and RMI sectors, but execution was slow. With increasing levels of public debt,

spending on infrastructure was reduced and progress on a number of large projects was delayed. While our businesses delivered modest price increases in cement, aggregates and readymixed concrete, cement and aggregates volumes were lower in 2013 and overall operating profit was below 2012. In South-Eastern Europe, our concrete and clay operations were negatively impacted by fragile markets and strong competition, with 2013 operating profit and margins down versus 2012.

Europe Lightside – 2013

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

  

€ million

 

 

%
Change

 

  

2013

 

  

2012

 

   

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

 

Divestments

 

  

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Pension
gains

 

  

Exchange

 

 
 

Sales revenue

  -4%    856    888     -32      -30    +33    -28    -    -    -7  
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -9%    71    78     -7      -7    +2    -1    -1    +1    -1  
 

EBITDA (as defined)*
margin

   

  8.3%    8.8%                                 
 

Operating profit

  -43%    28    49     -21      -10    -    -1    -11    +1    -  
 

 

Pension restructuring gains amounted to €1 million (2012: nil)

 

  

    

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €6 million (2011: €5 million)

Impairment charges of €13 million were incurred (2012: €3 million)

 

  

  

 

EBITDA (as defined)* above includes pension restructuring gains and operating profit is also stated after impairment charges; the net €12 million adverse impact of these items has been excluded from the commentary that follows.

Our Lightside business in Europe is located primarily in Germany, the UK, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium and France. The division is one-third exposed to repair activity and two-thirds exposed to new build work. Construction activity in most of these markets was severely impacted by the prolonged winter conditions in the early months of 2013. Although the Lightside business was less impacted due to its greater exposure to the repairs sector, weaker trading in key markets in the first half led to a reduction in overall operating profit in 2013. Trading levels in the second half of 2013 were broadly in line with 2012, leading to an overall full-year like-for-like sales decline of 3% versus 2012. Our markets remained weak in the Netherlands where new-build activity continued to deteriorate, while Switzerland, Belgium and France were somewhat more resilient. In Germany the market backdrop was more mixed with declines in non-residential and infrastructure activity offset by improving residential RMI activity. The UK was the only moderatelymajor market showing growth in 2013, benefiting from strong residential markets. Despite a sharp focus on continued cost discipline, overcapacity in some more competitive markets led to margin erosion, impacting negatively on overall profitability. In response to these challenging markets, as in prior years, we continued to engage in a number of restructuring measures to help realign our cost base to lower volumes.

Construction Accessories

With lower construction activity in our major markets, 2013 operating profit was behind 2012 due to lower volumes and continuing margin pressure in parts of the business. Difficult European markets, combined with the adverse weather effect in the first half of 2013, negatively impacted profits. However, the export side of our business and the UK performed solidly.

Shutters & Awnings

This business, which is concentrated in Germany and the Netherlands, benefited from stable demand in 2013, despite difficult markets, and with the contribution from 2012 acquisitions, 2013 operating profit was ahead of 2012.

Fencing & Cubis

Our Fencing business in the Netherlands suffered declining sales in 2013 due to intense competition and a weather-impacted first half of the year. Price pressure was a key feature in this market, but a recovery in the German side of this business offset this somewhat. We also benefited from a shift in product mix in our UK Fencing & Security businesses, which helped to improve margins. The Mobile Fencing business also experienced difficult markets, however, due to cost reduction measures, 2013 operating profit and margin were in line with 2012. Cubis, our composite access chambers business, benefited from a robust UK market which drove higher sales and profits in 2013.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

80      CRH


Europe Distribution – 2013

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

 

%
Change

 

  

2013

 

  

2012

 

  

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

 

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Pensions

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

  -1%    3,936    3,956    -20      -175    +180    -    -    -25   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -14%    186    217    -31      -47    +7    -1    +11    -1   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

  4.7%    5.5%                             
 

Operating profit

  -27%    106    145    -39      -48    +4    -5    +11    -1   
 

Pension restructuring gains amounted to €11 million (2012: nil)

 

  

    

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €4 million (2012: €3 million)

Impairment charges of €4 million were incurred (2012: nil)

 

  

  

 

 

EBITDA (as defined)* above includes pension restructuring gains and operating profit is also stated after impairment charges; the net €7 million impact of these items has been excluded from the commentary that follows.

The Distribution business was also impacted by the adverse first-half weather conditions in 2013. This together with weak construction activity and low consumer confidence, particularly in the Netherlands (which accounts for almost 30% of 2013 Distribution sales), contributed to a 4% reduction in like-for-like sales in 2013, the impact of which was largely offset by the incremental impact of acquisitions completed in 2012 and 2013. Following sharp profit reductions in the first half of 2013, the second half saw a moderation in the rate of decline which, combined with previous restructuring efforts and cost saving initiatives and certain pension curtailment benefits, limited the overall decline in full-year EBITDA (as defined)* to 14%.

Our professional builders merchants network was strengthened by three acquisitions during 2013. In the Benelux, we acquired a well-established seven-branch builders merchant, which complements our existing Dutch business, and a two-branch Belgian operator. We also acquired four branches in northern France increasing our Normandy network to 19 locations.

Professional Builders Merchants

Overall 2013 results for our wholly-owned professional builders merchants business, which operates 349 branches in six countries, were lower than in 20102012. The incremental contribution from acquisitions more than offset the shortfall in like-for-like sales in the Benelux where weak markets, especially in Dutch residential and new-build, continued to impact performance. Despite strong cost control and economies of scale from acquisitions, operating profit was behind 2012. Sales levels in France were slightly lower for 2013 overall but operating profit improved due to the continued focus on pricing, purchasing and cost control. In Switzerland, the strength of the Swiss Franc continued to affect competitiveness contributing to a decline in sales and, despite significantthe ongoing roll-out of various excellence programmes, both operating margin pressures and particularlyprofit were also lower than 2012. Sales levels in Austria were severely impacted by the bad weather in the first quarter of 2013 and operational challenges due to a system implementation, resulting in operating

profit that was significantly behind 2012. Despite the severe impact of the bad weather in early 2013, our builders merchants activities in Germany saw improved trading from April onwards and, together with better margins and good cost control, resulted in operating profit for the year that was in line with 2012.

DIY

Our wholly-owned DIY business operates 196 stores in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Operating profit for 2013 was lower than in 2012. In the Netherlands, the combination of the very severe weather during the first quarter of 2013 and the continued weakness in consumer confidence resulted in sales levels in our Dutch DIY business that were significantly lower than 2012 and operating profit declined despite restructuring and cost-saving measures. In Belgium, our DIY activities proved more resilient and reported similar sales and operating profit in 2013 to those achieved in 2012. In a challenging environment for the German DIY sector, sales in our German DIY business were also impacted by the adverse weather and, despite continued cost focus, operating profit and margin were lower than 2012.

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing

2013 sales for our SHAP business, which operates 126 branches, were ahead of 2012 due to an organic improvement in our German and Belgian businesses together with the incremental impact of the two Belgian acquisitions completed in the second half of 2012. Due to the challenging market conditions in Switzerland, 2013 results were lower compared with 2012. Overall operating profit for our SHAP activities was ahead of 2012 assisted by the contribution from acquisitions.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

LOGO

CRH      81


LOGO

Americas Materials – 2013

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

 

%
Change

 

  

2013

 

  

2012

 

  

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

 

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

  -3%    4,721    4,886    -165      -147    +141    -    -    -159   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -    557    555    +2      -15    +33    -    +2    -18   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

  11.8%    11.4%                             
 

Operating profit

  -19%    226    279    -53      -12    +26    -    -58    -9   
     

 

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €12 million (2012: €14 million)

Impairment charges of €60 million were incurred (2012: nil)

 

  

  

 

 

The commentary below excludes the adverse impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

Adverse weather conditions in 2013, which had resulted in a 25% decline in first-half US$ EBITDA (as defined)*, continued to impact operations in July and in the early weeks of August. Trading conditions proved much more favourable thereafter through to November and second-half US$ EBITDA (as defined)* was ahead of the corresponding period in 2012. Positive first-half trends in pricing continued into the second half of 2013. Though overall like-for-like sales revenue was 3% lower than 2012, contributions from acquisitions resulted in overall US$ EBITDA (as defined)* for 2013 being 4% ahead of 2012.

A total of 10 acquisitions were completed in 2013 at a cost of €77 million, adding 457 million tonnes of reserves, 13 operating quarries, 5 strategic reserves locations, 6 asphalt plants and 7 readymixed concrete plants with annual production of 2.0 million tonnes of aggregates, 0.4 million tonnes of asphalt and 0.1 million cubic metres of readymixed concrete.

Energy and related costs: The price of bitumen, a key component of asphalt mix, declined by 4% in 2013 following a 7% increase in 2012. Prices for diesel and gasoline, important inputs to aggregates, readymixed concrete and paving operations, decreased by 2% and 3% respectively. The price of energy used at our asphalt plants, consisting of fuel oil, recycled oil, electricity and natural gas, fell by 1%. Recycled asphalt and shingles accounted for approximately 20% of total asphalt requirements in 2013. Wider use of warm-mix asphalt continued to deliver cost and customer benefits. With the positive effects of lower bitumen costs and further increased use of recycled asphalt, unit costs reduced by 2% from 2012.

Aggregates: 2013 like-for-like volumes were slightly ahead of 2012 while total volumes including acquisitions increased 7%. Average prices increased by 3% on a like-for-like basis and 2% overall compared with 2012. Price increases together with efficient cost control resulted in an improved margin for this business in 2013.

Asphalt: Impacted by poor weather and a later start to paving projects, like-for-like volumes were down 7% in 2013 with total volumes including acquisitions down 3%. While the average like-for-like sales price fell 1% in 2013 and overall average price fell 2%, with the benefit of the 4% reduction in bitumen costs, margin per unit was maintained in 2013.

Readymixed Concrete: Like-for-like volumes decreased 2% in 2013 while total volumes including acquisitions were up 2% compared with 2012. With average prices 4% higher on a like-for-like basis and up 5% overall, margins improved in 2013.

Paving and Construction Services: The poor first-half weather also contributed to a later start on paving projects, resulting in 2013 sales being 5% lower than 2012, and a reduction of 6% on a like-for-like basis in 2013. Pricing remained under pressure in a competitive bidding environment; however, efficiency improvements enabled an improvement in overall margin.

Regional Performance

East

The East region comprises operations in 22 states, the most important of which are Ohio, New York, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The adverse weather conditions in the springfirst half of 2013 had the greatest impact on the Mid-Atlantic division, which reported lower results than in 2012. In the Northeast division, 2013 results benefited from the inclusion of acquisitions completed at the end of 2012, and autumn.operating results improved. The Central division profits were broadly consistent with 2012 with lower volumes offset by improved prices. The residential market in Florida continued its upward trend contributing to strong volumes, better prices and margin growth, and positively impacting performance in the Southeast division. Overall 2013 operating profit for the East region was higher than 2012 with volumes 8%, 4% and 9% ahead of 2012 for aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete respectively.

West

The West region also has operations in 22 states, the most important of which are Utah, Texas, Washington, Missouri, Iowa, Kansas and Mississippi, and is organised into three divisions. Overall operating profit was lower. In ourMississippi. Poor weather conditions that persisted through to mid-August affected 2013 results in both the Central West and Mountain West divisions, with a reduction in large infrastructure contracts in Utah further contributing to the lower outcome in Mountain West compared with 2012. More positively, the Northwest division which experienced disruptions to first-half construction activitysaw substantial improvement over 2012’s record lows. With overall declines in certain markets causedasphalt and readymixed concrete volumes of 14% and 3% respectively, only partly offset by the floodingincreases in aggregates volumes of the Mississippi river and its tributaries,4%, 2013 operating profit was lower than in 2010 as both public and private activity declined. Our Mountain West and Northwest divisions benefited from large jobs and moderately improved market demand leading to increases in volume. Both of these divisions delivered improved profits.2012.

Outlook - Americas Materials

The US housing market appears to have stabilised and we have seen some expansion in commercial activity underpinned by growth in the manufacturing and energy sectors. Overall we expect commercial

CRH    47


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

and residential demand to be flat to slightly up in 2012. The most recent extension of the federal highway programme expires on 31 March, 2012. We anticipate a new bill or further extensions to be achieved over the coming months with funding for highways close to that in 2011. Ongoing state and local government fiscal pressures coupled with the roll-off of the federal stimulus bill will likely result in moderately lower Infrastructure volume for the year as a whole.

Overall, we expect 2012 volume for our mix of business to be relatively flat with 2011. Our focus for 2012 is therefore to achieve further price increases and efficiency improvements against a continuing challenging input cost backdrop.

Europe Products

2011 overview

Results 

%

Change

  

2011

  

2010

  

Total
Change

    Analysis of change 
million      Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  

Restructuring/

Impairment

  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  -6%    2,648    2,817    -169     +175    +20    -364    -    -  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  -2%    194    198    -4     +9    +3    -8    -8    -  

Operating profit

  n/m    66    11    +55     +19    +1    +3    +31    +1  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      7.3%    7.0%            

Operating profit margin

      2.5%    0.4%            
Restructuring costs amounted to24 million (2010:16 million); impairment charges of15 million were incurred (2010:54 million)  

 

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

Overall, Europe

82      CRH


Americas Products experienced better trading conditions– 2013

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

 

%
Change

 

  

2013

 

  

2012

 

  

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

 

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

  +9%    3,068    2,806    +262      +219    +166    -6    -    -117   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

  +21%    246    204    +42      +37    +21    -    -9    -7   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

  8.0%    7.3%                             
 

Operating profit

  -21%    68    86    -18      +49    +12    -    -76    -3   
   Restructuring costs amounted to €11 million (2012: €2 million)

Impairment charges of €71 million were incurred (2012: €4 million)

 

  

  

 

 

The commentary below excludes the adverse impact of impairment charges on operating profit.

A recovery in 2011 although it was a mixed picture across our various businesses, and reported results were impacted by divestments completed during 2011. The first half was helped by significantly better weather conditions, particularlyresidential construction in the early monthsUnited States and an ongoing pick-up in overall economic activity helped Americas Products improve its results in 2013. Like-for-like sales were 8% ahead of 2012. The impact of input cost pressures was more than offset by a continued tight focus on operational efficiency and targeted pricing improvements. As a result, with the year,benefit of organic growth, modest pricing benefits, cost reduction initiatives and like-for-like sales grew by 8%. The second half sawcontributions from acquisitions, the rate of growthsegment achieved a significant increase in organic sales moderate to 4% as weakening consumer confidence and further austerity measures in the Eurozone economies contributed to negative sentiment. With lower restructuring and impairment charges, second-half operating profit improved versus 2010.and margin in 2013.

2011 sawFour acquisitions were completed in 2013 at a total spend of €123 million. Of particular note was the completionacquisition by our Architectural Products Group (“APG”) of hardscape and masonry operations both in Western Canada (seven facilities) and the divestmentCarolinas (14 plants), extending our footprints of our Insulationcore product categories into new markets. The Canadian acquisition establishes APG as the only coast-to-coast manufacturer of masonry and Climate Control businesses, inhardscape products.

Architectural Products

APG is a leading supplier of masonry and hardscape products, packaged lawn and garden products, clay brick and fencing solutions. In addition to some smallercontractor-based new construction, the DIY and professional RMI segments are significant end-users. After a slow start to 2013, the business disposals. The table above reflects the impact in 2011 of the disposal of these businesses, which had incurred a net loss in 2010benefited from improving new residential construction, increasing RMI spend and which accounted for48 million of the total54 million restructuring charges in 2010.

Concrete Products

Activity levels in 2011 were supported by more benign winterfavourable weather conditions in the first and fourth quarter compared with 2010. Against this, weakening consumer sentiment in the second half of the year,year. However, overall growth was dampened somewhat by weak recovery in the non-residential segment. Generally activity was more robust in the West and South while remaining more challenged in the Northeast, Midwest and Eastern Canada. The improving housing market, together with product innovation and commercial initiatives, drove gains across most businesses while further cost reduction measures and selected price improvements offset the impact of government austerity measures and higher energy input costs, resulted in slower activity in the Netherlands. This was partly offset by resilient demand in Germany and an improved performance in Denmark. With the strong first and fourth quarter performance,costs. Overall, APG recorded a higher operating profit for the full year was significantly higher than 2010.

Our Architectural operations (tiles, pavers, blocks) were impacted by weaker consumer confidence in the second half of the year, in particular within the garden segment in Benelux, and revenues were lower than 2010. In the Netherlands, weaker government and municipal spending had a negative impact on demand. Our German operations, where we have invested in three additional plants, showed a strong performance in 2011. Overall operating profit was ahead of 2010. Our Structural operations reported operating profit well ahead of 2010 on the back of restructuring initiatives in previous years in all markets. In Denmark, our results advanced strongly. Our sand lime block business in the Netherlands and our Belgian specialty

48    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

business, which supplies the residential, industrial and agricultural sector, continued to deliver strong results. Within central and eastern Europe, Hungary experienced a recovery and trading conditions in Poland remained positive. With lower restructuring costs, operating profit for the structural business was well ahead of last year.

Clay Products

In the UK new house completions increased during 2011; however, this improvement was partly offset by a decline in housing repair and maintenance activity, and industry brick volumes were largely in line with 2010. Although delays in recovering significant energy cost increases impacted our business, overall operating profit was ahead of 2010 as a result of efficiencies and once-off gains resulting from our restructuring programme. In Mainland Europe our markets remained challenging. Operating profit was lower than 2010 as a result of significant production cutbacks to reduce stock levels and two further plant closures in Germany.

Building Products

This group reported2013, reflecting a 3% increase in like-for-like sales, margin improvement and a solid contribution from continuingrecent acquisitions.

Precast

The Precast group manufactures a broad range of value-added concrete and polymer-based products primarily for utility

infrastructure applications. The business saw an improved market environment in 2013 and registered solid gains as growth initiatives continued to deliver. Improvements were seen in most regions with particular progress in the Great Plains, northern California and Mid-Atlantic regions. Commercial and infrastructure markets remained generally subdued but residential demand, as well as energy and environment-related markets, continued to show positive trends. In our traditional utility and structural precast products businesses volumes increased 5% over 2012 and higher input costs were recovered through price increases. Overall like-for-like sales increased by 6% in 2013 and operating profit advanced significantly in 2013.

BuildingEnvelope®

The BuildingEnvelope® group is North America’s leading supplier of architectural glass and aluminium glazing systems to close the building envelope. New non-residential building activity, a key market segment for this business, was largely flat in 2013 resulting in challenging market conditions. Despite this backdrop, ongoing initiatives to gain market share and differentiate the year. Volumesbusiness through innovative product and technology offerings drove solid top-line growth. Organic sales rose 14% in 2013, outpacing the overall market. The Architectural Glass and Storefront division benefited from an improved pricing environment, resilient non-residential RMI activity and a generally more favourable product mix. Our Engineered Glazing Systems division enjoyed increased slightly, however market pressureactivity as major project work progressed. With a tight focus on cost control, product quality and improved processes, the business delivered operating profit improvement in 2013.

South America

2013 results for our operations in Argentina improved compared with 2012; production and sales mix changes contributed to an increase in volumes, prices and higher raw material input costs negatively affected margins, causing operating profit from continuing businesses to be marginally behind last year. Our Construction Accessories business, which is the market leader in Western Europe, started the year well with increased volumesmarginal contribution in the first half. Duefloor and wall tile segments. Results from our businesses in Chile were down on 2012 with modest gains in specialised construction products offset by lower prices in our glass products due to the economic uncertainty, volumes fell in the second halfincreased competition. Overall 2013 sales and with increasing pressure on margins; overall operating profit for the year was broadlyour South American operations were higher than in line with 2010. The Outdoor Security business, specialising in entrance control and perimeter protection solutions, showed a mixed picture. Fencing had to cope with weaker volumes and fierce competition, resulting in a lower operating profit outcome. Our Shutters & Barriers business did very well in the beginning of 2011, but faced a more difficult second half with lower volumes than last year; however, with tight cost control, and a good market position, results were ahead of last year.2012.

Outlook - Europe Products

Our Products businesses, which are predominantly located in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and France, are exposed to new construction. Given the most recent economic developments in the Eurozone, we are more cautious in relation to the outlook for 2012. A rapid and continuing decline of consumer confidence, low activity levels in residential and non-residential markets and further austerity measures announced by governments to reduce budget deficits, make for an uncertain outlook in 2012. However, the German and Danish markets continue to be robust and to perform well and we expect benefits from our ongoing restructuring measures.

Americas Products

2011 overview

Results 

%

Change

  

2011

  

2010

  

Total
Change

    Analysis of change 
million      Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  

Restructuring/

Impairment

  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  -4%    2,378    2,469    -91     +51    +37    -70    -    -109  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  +6%    164    154    +10     -26    +7    +8    +25    -4  

Operating profit

  n/m    42    (24  +66     -16    +6    +13    +61    +2  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      6.9%    6.2%            

Operating profit margin

      1.8%    -1.0%            
Restructuring costs amounted to4 million (2010:29 million); impairment charges of4 million were incurred (2010:40 million)  

 

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

CRH    49LOGO


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

2011 saw the pace of decline in our markets moderate significantly, and we saw some top-line growth in the year. Overall like-for-like sales were 2% ahead compared with 2010. Organic profits and margins were impacted by higher fuel and other input costs, and by costs associated with the first-year roll-out of our Building Solutions programme. However, higher sales, together with the benefit of ongoing cost reduction initiatives, lower restructuring and impairment costs and a full year of our reorganised Building Products group, resulted in a significant improvement in overall operating profit to42 million (2010: loss of24 million).

Our Building Products group completed 4 bolt-on transactions during 2011. The acquisition of a leading paving manufacturer in Canada in May was the largest transaction; this complements and strengthens our existing business in eastern Canada. In our masonry business, we acquired a small block manufacturer and distributor in Indiana in July. Our Lawn and Garden business closed on a small mulch and soils supplier serving the greater Boston market in December, while our Precast business unit acquired a Florida-based highway barrier and specialty precast manufacturer in the first half of 2011. The impact of divestments shown in the table above reflects the effect of the disposal in late 2010 of the loss-making Ivy Steel business acquired as part of the 2006 MMI acquisition.

Building Products

With effect from January 2011 our architectural products and precast groups, together with the retained MMI construction accessories and fencing businesses, were combined to form the Building Products Group. This group has been successful in capturing market growth opportunities while saving costs by applying common business processes and functions.

With the benefit of acquisitions, our Architectural Products business showed modest sales growth in 2011, against a background of continuing soft residential and non-residential markets. Our Canada business, which had held up well in recent years, slowed in 2011. However, we benefited from continued stability across the full breadth of architectural products in our businesses which supply both the DIY and professional RMI segments. Cost reduction and rationalisation measures partly offset the impact of higher input costs. Results from the fencing business improved, and significantly reduced losses were recorded. Overall, this business recorded an increase in underlying operating profit for the year.

Our Precast business again suffered from weak demand and competitive pricing pressures across its markets. Further declines in the commercial sector in particular impacted results, and full-year volumes were flat compared with 2010. Our enclosures business, which had been challenged in recent years, showed a welcome improvement in profitability; however, this was more than offset by margin declines in our traditional precast activities. The construction accessories business (formerly part of MMI) was successfully absorbed into the precast organisation and losses reduced. Overall operating profit was lower, despite further progress in reducing costs.

BuildingEnvelope™

Non-residential sector activity was again depressed in 2011, providing another year of very challenging markets for this group. Despite these market conditions, we were able to increase sales by 9% and improve our competitive position in our traditional Architectural Glass and Storefront business. Our ongoing efforts to maintain market share, together with tight cost controls and improved processes, resulted in improved operating profit in this business after a poor 2010. Our Engineered Glazing Systems business also improved and continued to generate favourable margins through strong execution on some large jobs which were completed in 2011.

South America

While our Chile businesses continued to perform well, operating profit in our Argentina operations was much lower. Our ceramic tile business suffered from significant price competition, cost inflation pressures, and periodic production disruptions caused by natural gas shortages. Overall, while sales were higher, operating profit in our South American operations was significantly lower.

50    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

Outlook - Americas Products

There are increasing signs that residential construction activity has finally stabilised, while the rate of decline in the non-residential sector has slowed. Against this backdrop we expect further modest sales growth in 2012. This combined with further progress on, and benefit from, the cost and streamlining measures mentioned above, gives cause for cautious optimism for an improved operating profit outcome for 2012.

Europe Distribution

2011 overview

Results               Analysis of change 
million 

%

Change

  2011  2010  

Total

Change

    Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  

Restructuring/

Impairment

  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  +22%    4,340    3,566    +774     +154    +486    -    -    +134  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  +25%    267    214    +53     +12    +32    -    -    +9  

Operating profit

  +41%    190    135    +55     +19    +23    -    +6    +7  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      6.2%    6.0%            

Operating profit margin

      4.4%    3.8%            

Restructuringcosts amounted to4 million (2010:4 million); impairment charges of2 million were incurred (2010:8 million)

  

 

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.
CRH      83

2011 saw satisfactory like-for-like sales growth in most of our markets with both the new residential and RMI sectors benefiting from benign winter conditions at the beginning and end of the year. While the first half of the year saw a 7% increase in like-for-like sales, this moderated in the second half to bring the full year organic sales increase to 4%. Overall operating profit and margins for the year improved as a result of better cost control and our focus on commercial excellence and procurement optimisation.


LOGO

Recent acquisitions have enhanced the geographic balance of Europe Distribution’s business: in 2011, approximately 35% of Europe Distribution’s sales arose in the Benelux, with Switzerland accounting for almost 30%, Germany for approximately 20% and other countries, mainly France and Austria, accounting for the remaining 15%. The December 2010 acquisition of an additional 50% of Bauking in Germany, and the full-year inclusion of Sax Sanitair in Belgium (acquired in August 2010), contributed strongly to the increase in overall operating profit. In 2011 EuropeAmericas Distribution acquired three Belgian specialist merchants in SHAP materials, adding a total of 10 branches to Sax Sanitair’s existing network.

Professional Builders Merchants

With 419 locations in six countries, Professional Builders Merchants has strong market positions in all its regions. Overall operating profit for this business improved in 2011.

While markets in Benelux remained stable, both sales and operating profit increased during 2011. Sales levels in France increased significantly compared with 2010; despite some pressure on margins, profitability improved strongly reflecting the impact of the restructuring actions initiated in 2010. Our operations in Switzerland had another good year as a result of strong margin management and the roll-out of various excellence programmes. Austria, which has seen a turnaround in performance in recent years, delivered a good increase in sales and a strong improvement in both margin and operating profit. In Germany, like-for-like sales in Bauking improved significantly during 2011, with strong market growth and integration benefits positively impacting operating profit.

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing

Our SHAP business in Germany and Switzerland again proved to be a stable performer in 2011 with robust sales and further improved operating profit performance. Our business in Belgium performed strongly and– 2013

 

CRH    51


Business Review

 

 

Results

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

Analysis of change

 

 

  

 

 
  

€ million

 

  

 

%
Change

 

   

2013

 

   

2012

 

   

Total
Change

 

      

Organic

 

  

Acquisitions

 

  

Divestments

 

  

Restructuring/
Impairment

 

  

Exchange

 

   
 

Sales revenue

   +6%     1,664     1,576     +88      +112    +27    -    -    -51   
 

EBITDA (as defined)*

   +7%     89     83     +6      +8    +1    -    -    -3   
 

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

  

   5.3%     5.3%                              
 

Operating profit

   +14%     67     59     +8      +10    -    -    -    -2   
     

 

Restructuring costs amounted to €1 million (2012: €1 million)

 

  

 

 

 

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

exceeded expectations. With a total of 103 branches in three countries, our expanded SHAP business is taking shape in line with our strategy to build a European platform in the growing repair, maintenance and improvement focussed SHAP market.

DIY

Our DIY platform in Europe operates a network of 241 stores under four different brands; Gamma and Karwei in the Benelux, Bauking in Germany and MaxMat in Portugal. With lower restructuring costs in 2011, overall DIY operating profit was ahead of 2010.

In the Netherlands, weakening consumer confidence as the year progressed resulted in lower sales in 2011. Despite this market development, we were able to maintain our operating profit with better margins as a result of a successful purchasing programme, our strong focus on efficient store operations and cost-control programmes. In Belgium our network of 19 stores reported stable sales but better operating profit. With increasing consumer confidence and continued strong focus on costs, operating profit for Bauking’s 47-store DIY network in Germany improved to satisfactory levels. The economic environment in Portugal became more difficult and sales declined further; operating results remained at the level of 2010.

Outlook - Europe Distribution

After a successful 2011 we believe that market circumstances may deteriorate somewhat in 2012. We continue to have favourable expectations with our strong footprint in the German, Austrian, Swiss and Belgian markets; however, for the Netherlands and France the outlook has weakened. With 65% end-use sector exposure to RMI and with continuing operational excellence programmes we expect to see an improvement in 2012.

Americas Distribution

2011 overview

Results               Analysis of change 
million 

%

Change

  2011  2010  

Total

Change

    Organic  Acquisitions  Divestments  Restructuring  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  +8%    1,335    1,239    +96     +133    +22    -    -    -59  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  +8%    65    60    +5     +9    -1    -    -    -3  

Operating profit

  +22%    45    37    +8     +11    -1    -    -    -2  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      4.9%    4.8%            

Operating profit margin

      3.4%    3.0%            

Restructuringcosts were1 million (2010:1 million); no impairment charges were incurred (2010: nil)

  

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Americas Distribution, trading as Allied Building Products (Allied)(“Allied”), showedexperienced solid performance across its activities in 2013 and reported good growth in 2011. Activity levels in both segments of ouroverall results. Both business improveddivisions continued to advance and although gross margins came under some pressure as suppliers implemented price increases,sales and operating profit were ahead of 2012. Performance in our Exterior Products business was led by a strong Northeast and the rebuilding efforts following Hurricane Sandy. The Interior Products business continued to show growth as both volumes and pricing improved significantly over 2010.throughout 2013.

Allied’s organisation structure was further streamlined in 2011, providing opportunity to consolidate its market footprint and position the group for future opportunities. The business has continuedIn 2013, Allied management maintained its focus on purchasing, logisticsstreamlining administrative procedures and pricing initiatives and rationalisationeliminating redundant processes through a significant internal initiative. This simplification of administrative and geographic oversight functions, thereby increasing efficiency, control and profitability. This aggressive operating approach again benefited 2011 operating results.

After three years of curtailed development activity during which the business responded to the difficult macro-economic environment with organisational changes and other cost saving initiatives, Allied had a

52    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Current Year

busy year in 2011processes, along with the completionongoing evolution of six acquisitions. The largest transaction,our organisational structure, is aimed at improving acquisition integration and enhancing operating synergies and should allow for greater economies of scale as our business, and the acquisition of Unitedoverall markets, grow.

We completed three small transactions in 2013. A three-branch Interior Products a 15-branch exterior distributor headquartered in Minnesota, and with branches in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North and South Dakota and Nebraska, was completed in December. United brings our network of branchescompany based in the Northern Plains to 26,Baltimore/Washington, D.C. market was acquired in April and is expected to improve significantly the operational efficiency and effectiveness of our existing businesses while increasing our sales footprint in the region. In September, the acquisition of Pacific Source, a four-branch distributor providing Hawaiian builders withInterior Products business based in northern Florida was added in October 2013. Certain assets of a broad range of products required to complete building projects, extended Allied’s existing footprint in Hawaii while providing the opportunity to generate significant fixed cost synergies. The other transactions included a four-branch distributor in Philadelphia, a two-branchsmall distressed business in Detroit and two single-branch opportunitiesHouston were also acquired to provide a platform for an Exterior Products strategy in Atlanta and Austin.Texas.

TriBuilt,Progress continued to be made in 2013 to increase brand awareness of Tri-Built, Allied’s proprietary private label brand, continuedas both sales and product offerings grew. Additionally, Allied implemented a new greenfield and service centre strategy in order to gain strength ashelp drive growth in existing markets. The new products were addedservice centre model will enable us to improve customer service, consolidate fixed costs and market acceptance grew. The TriBuilt label has helpedmore efficiently leverage branch assets. This new customer service platform, together with our process and procedure streamlining efforts and our commitment to employee development, continue to further help differentiate Allied in the market while building an exclusive brand identity. In addition, a merchandising initiative was launched to enhance the look and feel of branch showrooms and increase the number of products available to contractors at point of purchase. The reconfigured showrooms provide a one-stop-shop for customers while increasing sales of higher margin tools and accessories.marketplace.

Exterior Products

Allied is oneExterior Products are largely comprised of the top three roofing and siding distributors inproducts, the United States. Demanddemand for which is greatly influenced by residential and commercial replacement activity (75% of sales volume is RMI-related) with key products having an average life span of 25 years. Volumes improved in line with national shipmentsAllied continued to maintain its position as one of asphalt shingles up 13%the top three roofing and siding distributors in the year; thisUnited States. Strong growth was however from a very low 2010 base. Regionally,experienced in the Northeast Mid-Atlantic, Upper Midwestin 2013 driven by the rebuilding efforts following Hurricane Sandy. However, competitive pressures across the industry continued as the overall market contracted from 2012 leading to price pressure in all regions.

A regional restructuring was completed in 2013 with the focus on reducing costs and California markets have held up better andimproving customer service, which allowed us to maintain operating margin at a level consistent with 2012. Overall the Exterior Products division recorded furtherreported sales growth and a good advance in operating profit for the year, despite costs associated with flood damage arising from substantial September rainfall in the Northeast.ahead of 2012.

Interior Products

ThisThe Interior Products business sells wallboard, steel studs and acoustical ceiling systems to specialised contractors and has low exposure to weather-driven replacement activity; however, it is heavily dependent on the new residential and commercial construction market.market, having low exposure to weather-driven replacement activity. Allied is the third largestthird-largest Interior Products distributor in the US. The new construction market appears to have stabilised at historically low activity levels; shipments of wallboard, a good barometer of market activity, were generally unchanged for the yearUnited States. Performance in Allied’s market areas. Salesthis business was strong in all markets in 2013 with increased volumes and operating performance improved, with notable recovery in someprices of our Western markets, helped by an increase in market share,core products contributing to higher sales and improved operating margin, which further benefited from the lower cost base and the consolidation of smaller and underperforming locations.

Outlook - Americas Distribution

With good indications that we have finally reached a trough in residential activity, we look to continuing improved performance in our RMI-focussed Exterior Products business. However, commercial construction activity continues to decline modestly, impacting the short-term outlook for our Interior Products segment. Overall, with the benefit of the consolidation and cost reduction measures outlined above, we are looking to a year of further progress in 2012.

CRH    53


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

Finance Review

Summary of 2010 Results

Trading in the first half of 2010 was especially difficult with weather conditions in the early months even more severe than in the weather-affected first quarter of 2009. Reported sales revenues for the first half declined by 8% (10% excluding acquisition and exchange translation effects), EBITDA (as defined)* fell 20% and operating profit and profit before tax were down 51% and 77% respectively.

The second half of 2010 showed a moderation in the rate of decline. Second half sales were ahead of second half 2009 (down 3.5% excluding acquisitions and translation effects), while EBITDA (as defined)* declined by 5%; operating profit was down 19% and profit before tax 18% lower than the second half of 2009.

Europe Materials benefitedresulting from cost reduction measures and trading in CO2 allowances which resulted in EBITDA (as defined)* and operating profit levels close to 2009 levels. Pricing generally was more challenging than in 2009 even in those markets which enjoyed good volume growth. Europe Products & Distribution saw operating profits fall by approximately 40% with practically all the decline attributable to Products activities. Once again repair, maintenance & improvement (RMI) oriented Distribution operations proved more resilient with operating profit only marginally below 2009 levels.

Americas Materials benefited from infrastructure projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. However, weaker than expected third quarter activity levels in markets supported totally by State and Municipal funds led to a sharp revision in our full year expectations for the Division and to a decline of 29% in full year operating profit in euro terms.

Our Products operations in the Americas which rely predominantly on US residential and non-residential construction suffered severely. This, combined with impairment charges, was only partly offset by a much-improved performance in RMI-oriented Distribution activities, and resulted in operating profit for the Americas Products & Distribution Division well below 2009.

Throughout the year our management teams Group-wide continued to build on the cost reduction and operational excellencesavings initiatives commencedundertaken in 2007. Cumulative annualised savings from these cost actions over the five years 2007 to 2011 are estimated at2.0 billion. These painful but necessary adjustments have been essential in protecting profitability and cash flow and in positioning the Group for eventual recovery in our markets.recent years.

Key Components of 2010 Performance

Table 1

million Revenue  EBITDA (as
defined)*
  Operating
profit
  Profit on
disposals
  Finance
costs
  Associates’
profit
after tax
  Pre-tax
profit
 

2009 as reported

  17,373    1,803    955    26    (297  48    732  

Exchange effects

  671    78    46    1    (8  2    41  

2009 at 2010 exchange rates

  18,044    1,881    1,001    27    (305  50    773  

Incremental impact in 2010 of:

       

2009/2010 acquisitions

  304    40    26    -    (6  -    20  

Restructuring costs

  -    105    105    -    -    -    105  

Impairment costs

  -    -    (61  -    -    (22  (83

Ongoing operations

  (1,175  (411  (373  28    64    -    (281

2010 as reported

  17,173    1,615    698    55    (247  28    534  

% change

  -1%    -10%    -27%       -27%  

 

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

84      CRH


54    CRHLOGO

CRH      85


Business ReviewLOGO

 

86        CRH


Board of Directors

Nicky Hartery

Chairman

Appointed to the Board:June 2004

Nationality:Irish

Age:63

Committee membership:Acquisitions

Committee; Finance Committee;

Nomination & Corporate Governance

Committee; Remuneration Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience: Nicky was Vice President of Manufacturing and Business Operations for Dell Inc.’s Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) operations from 2000 to 2008. Prior to joining Dell, he was Executive Vice President at Eastman Kodak and previously held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer at Verbatim Corporation, based in the United States.Qualifications: C.Eng, FIEI, MBA.

External appointments:Chief Executive of Prodigium, a consulting company which provides business advisory services; non-executive director of Musgrave Group plc, a privately-owned international food retailer, Eircom Limited, a telecommunications services provider in Ireland, and of Finning International, Inc., the world’s largest Caterpillar equipment dealer.

Albert Manifold

Chief Executive

Appointed to the Board:January 2009

Nationality:Irish

Age:52

Committee membership:Acquisitions

Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:Albert was appointed a CRH Board Director in January 2009. He joined CRH in 1998. Prior to joining CRH, he was Chief Operating Officer with a private equity group. While at CRH, he has held a variety of senior positions, including Finance Director of the Europe Materials Division, Group Development Director and Managing Director of Europe Materials. He became Chief Operating Officer in January 2009 and was appointed Group Chief Executive with effect from 1 January 2014.Qualifications: FCPA, MBA, MBS.

Maeve Carton

Finance Director

Appointed to the Board:May 2010

Nationality:Irish

Age:56

Committee membership:Acquisitions

Committee; Finance Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:Since joining CRH in 1988, Maeve has held a number of roles in the Group Finance area and was appointed Group Controller in 2001, Head of Group Finance in January 2009 and to the position of Finance Director in May 2010. She has broad-ranging experience of CRH’s reporting, control, budgetary and capital expenditure processes and has been extensively involved in CRH’s evaluation of acquisitions. Prior to joining CRH, she worked for a number of years as a chartered accountant in an international accountancy practice.Qualifications: MA, FCA.

External appointments:Board member of the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA), a state body that provides asset and liability management services to the Irish Government.

Mark S. Towe

Chief Executive Officer Oldcastle, Inc.

Appointed to the Board:July 2008

Nationality:United States

Age:65

Committee membership:Not

applicable

LOGO

Skills and experience:Mark joined CRH in 1997 and was appointed a CRH Board Director with effect from July 2008. In 2000, he was appointed President of Oldcastle Materials, Inc. and became the Chief Executive Officer of this Division in 2006. He was appointed to his current position of Chief Executive Officer of Oldcastle, Inc. (the holding company for CRH’s operations in the Americas) in July 2008. With over 40 years’ of experience in the building materials industry, he has overall responsibility for the Group’s aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete operations in the United States and its products and distribution businesses in the Americas.

LOGO

CRH      87


LOGO

Board of Directors| continued

Ernst J. Bärtschi

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:October 2011

Nationality:Swiss

Age:62

Committee membership:Audit

Committee(Financial expert);

Finance Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience: Ernst was Chief Executive of Sika AG, a manufacturer of speciality chemicals for construction and general industry, until 31 December 2011. Prior to joining Sika, he worked for the Schindler Group and was Chief Finance Officer between 1997 and 2001. Over the course of his career he has gained extensive experience in India, China and the Far East generally.Qualifications: LIC.OEC.HSG.

External appointments:Chairman of the Board of Directors of Conzetta AG, a broadly diversified Swiss company, member of the board of Bucher Industries AG, a mechanical and vehicle engineering company based in Switzerland; member of the advisory board of China Renaissance Capital Investment Inc., a private equity investment company in Hong Kong, China.

William P. Egan

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:January 2007

Nationality:United States

Age:69

Committee membership:Nomination

& Corporate Governance Committee;

Remuneration Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:Bill is founder and General Partner of Alta Communications and Marion Equity Partners LLC, Massachusetts-based venture capital firms. He is past Chairman of Cephalon Inc., and past President and Chairman of the National Venture Capital Association. He was until May 2014, director of the Irish venture capital company Delta Partners Limited.Qualifications: BA, MBA.

External appointments:He serves on the boards of several communications, cable and information technology companies.

Utz-Hellmuth Felcht

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:July 2007

Nationality:German

Age:67

Committee membership: Acquisitions

Committee; Finance Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:Utz-Hellmuth was, until May 2011, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Süd-Chemie Aktiengesellschaft. He was also Chief Executive of Degussa AG, Germany’s third largest chemical company, until May 2006, and a partner in the private equity group One Equity Partners Europe GmbH until July 2014.

External appointments:Chairman of the Supervisory board of German rail company Deutsche Bahn AG and director of Jungbunzlauer Holding AG.

John W. Kennedy

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:June 2009

Nationality:Irish

Age:64

Committee membership:Acquisitions Committee; Finance Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:John is past Chairman of Wellstream Holdings plc. In a 40 year career, he has served as Executive Vice President of Halliburton Company, President of Dresser Enterprises and Chief Operations Officer of Brown and Root Services. He is a past director of the UK Atomic Energy Authority and Integra Group.Qualifications: M.Sc, BE, C.Eng, FIEE.

External appointments:Non-executive Chairman of Lamprell plc; director of Maxwell Drummond International Limited and BiFold Group Limited.

Patrick J. Kennedy

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:January 2015

Nationality:Irish

Age:61

Committee membership:Acquisitions

Committee; Audit Committee

LOGO

Skills and experience:Pat was Chairman of the Executive Board of Directors of SHV Holdings (SHV), a large family-owned Dutch multinational company with a diverse range of operational and investment activities, including the production and distribution of energy, the provision of industrial services, heavy lifting and transport solutions, cash and carry wholesale and the provision of private equity. He retired from SHV mid-2014. During a 32 year career with SHV, he held various leadership roles across SHV’s diverse portfolio of businesses, while living in various parts of the world, and was a member of the Executive Board of SHV from 2001, before becoming Executive Chairman in 2006.Qualifications: MBS, BComm.

88      CRH


Donald A. McGovern, Jr.

Non-executive Director*

Appointed to the Board:July 2013

Nationality:United States

Age:63

Committee membership: Nomination

& Corporate Governance Committee; Remuneration Committee

  LOGO   

Skills and experience: Don retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in June 2013, following a 39 year career with the firm. During that time he was Vice Chairman, Global Assurance at PwC, a position he had held since July 2008 and directed the US firm’s services for a number of large public company clients. He also held various leadership roles in PwC and was, from July 2001 to June 2008, a member of, and past lead director for, the Board of Partners and Principals of the US firm as well as a member of PwC’s Global Board.Qualifications: CPA, MBA.

External appointments:Director of Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

* Don McGovern is Senior Independent Director

Heather Ann McSharry

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:February 2012

Nationality:Irish

Age:53

Committee membership:Audit Committee; Finance Committee

  LOGO   

Skills and experience:Heather Ann is a former Managing Director Ireland of Reckitt Benckiser and Boots Healthcare and was previously anon-executive director of Bank of Ireland plc and IDA Ireland.Qualifications: BComm, MBS.

External appointments:Non-executive director of Greencore Group plc and Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc; Chairman of the Bank of Ireland Pension Fund Trustees Board; director of Ergonomics Solutions International and the Institute of Directors.

Dan O’Connor

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:June 2006

Nationality:Irish

Age:55

Committee membership:Nomination

& Corporate Governance Committee; Remuneration Committee

  LOGO   

Skills and experience:Dan is a former President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Consumer Finance - Europe and a former Senior Vice-President of GE. He was Executive Chairman of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c. until October 2010.Qualifications: BComm, FCA.

External appointments:Director of Glanbia plc, an Irish food company and International Personal Finance plc, a consumer lending business.

Henk Rottinghuis

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:February 2014

Nationality:Dutch

Age:58

Committee membership: Acquisitions Committee; Audit Committee

  LOGO   

Skills and experience:Henk has a background in distribution, wholesale and logistics. He was until 2010, Chief Executive Officer at Pon Holdings B.V., a large, privately held international company which is focussed on the supply and distribution of passenger cars and trucks, and equipment for the construction and marine sectors. He was also a member of the Supervisory Board of the Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. and the retail group Detailresult Groep.Qualifications: Master’s degree in Dutch Law.

External appointments:Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Stork Technical Services and member of the Supervisory Board of the retail group Blokker Holding B.V.

Lucinda Riches

Non-executive Director

Appointed to the Board:March 2015

Nationality:British

Age:53

Committee membership:Nomination

& Corporate Governance Committee; Remuneration Committee

  LOGO   

Skills and experience:Lucinda spent the majority of her career in investment banking, including 21 years in UBS Investment Bank and its predecessor firms where she worked until 2007. She held senior management positions in the UK and the US, including Global Head and Chairman of the UBS Capital Markets Group and Vice Chairman of the Investment Banking Division.Qualifications: Master’s in Philosophy, Politics and Economics and a Master’s in Political Science.

External appointments:Non-executive director of UK Financial Investments Limited, which manages the UK government’s investments in financial institutions. She is also a non-executive director of Diverse Income Trust plc, Graphite Enterprise Trust plc, the British Standards Institution and a non-executive member of the Partnership Board of King & Wood Mallesons LLP. She is also a trustee of Sue Ryder.

LOGO

CRH      89


CRH plc has a secondary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange. For this reason, CRH plc is not subject to the same ongoing listing requirements as would apply to an Irish company with a primary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange. For further information, shareholders should consult their own financial adviser. Further details on the Group’s listing arrangements, including its premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, are set out on page 92.

LOGO

Corporate Governance Report

Chairman’s Introduction

The following report outlines our approach to corporate governance and how we implement the 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code (the 2012 Code).

The reports from the Chairmen ofAudit, Nomination&Corporate Governance andRemuneration Committees on pages 97, 102 and 108 respectively highlight the key areas of focus for, and the background to the principal decisions taken by, those Committees.

In relation to 2014, we complied in full with the provisions of the 2012 Code. We also have procedures in place for compliance with our obligations under the applicable rules and regulations issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Board Renewal and Re-election

We have recently appointed two new non-executive Directors to the Board. Pat Kennedy, former Chief Executive of SHV Holdings, a large family owned Dutch multi-national company with a diverse range of operational and investment activities, was appointed in January 2015. Lucinda Riches, who spent the majority of her career in investment banking, including 21 years in UBS Investment Bank and its predecessor firms where she worked in senior management positions in the UK and the US, was appointed on 1 March 2015. Their biographies, along with those of the other Board members are set out on pages 87 to 89. The Group’s approach to Board renewal and succession planning is set out on page 93 and in theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee section.

90        CRH


Last year, I reported that the Board had set itself the goal of increasing the number of female Directors to circa 25% of the Board by the end of 2015. In this regard, I am pleased to report that, following the 2015 Annual General Meeting, to be held in early May, one quarter of the Board will be female.

In relation to each of the Directors putting themselves forward for reelection at the 2015 Annual General Meeting, I have conducted a formal evaluation of the performance of each Director, which included training needs where appropriate. I can confirm that each of the Directors continues to perform effectively and to demonstrate strong commitment to the role.

As referred to in my introduction on page 2, John Kennedy and Dan O’Connor, after many years’ service to CRH, will retire from the Board following the conclusion of the 2015 Annual General Meeting.

Board Effectiveness and Training

During the course of 2015, an external consultant will be engaged to facilitate the external evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board. The external evaluation will supplement our existing internal evaluation processes, details of which are set out on page 94. The last externally facilitated evaluation was carried out in 2012. Also this year, together with Don McGovern who took over as Senior Independent Director in January 2015, I will be reviewing the training arrangements we have in place for Directors with a view to partnering with an external firm to provide a range of programmes which Directors can avail of on an ongoing basis.

Talent Management / Succession Planning

Throughout its history, CRH’s approach to recruiting, developing and retaining talented executives has resulted in a long standing tradition of making internal appointments for critical senior roles and is an important component in the achievement of the Group’s strategic priorities. Nevertheless, the Board recognises that CRH’s evolving organisation structure and the expansion of the Group’s geographic footprint over time will bring additional challenges. In this regard, we will be working with the Chief Executive and the Group Human Resources and Talent Development Director to take a fresh look at our processes in 2015 and the coming years to ensure we have a pipeline of executives at all levels to match our needs.

Shareholder Engagement and Reporting

This year the Senior Independent Director and I will again hold meetings with large shareholders prior to the Annual General Meeting to discuss any areas of concern in relation to the agenda for that meeting or other topical governance-related matters. We appreciate the level of interest and engagement in this process, which provides us with an insight into the views of shareholders on CRH’s governance structures and in relation to recent or upcoming developments in this area. I am always available to meet with shareholders outside of this process should the need arise.

Conclusion

As a Board, we are committed to a process of continued improvement in our collective effectiveness. In this regard, I look forward to the feedback from our upcoming external evaluation process.

Nicky Hartery

Chairman

    LOGO

CRH      91


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report |continued

Stock Exchange Listings and Corporate Governance Codes

CRH, which is incorporated in Ireland and subject to Irish company law, has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, a secondary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange and its American Depositary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

This Report describes CRH’s governance principles and practice and the Group’s risk management and internal control systems. The Report also sets out how CRH applies the main and supporting principles of the 2012 UK Corporate Governance Code (the 2012 Code).

A copy of the 2012 Code can be obtained from the Financial Reporting Council’s website, www.frc.org.uk.

Board of Directors

What are the responsibilities

of the Board?

LOGO

The Board is responsible for the leadership, oversight, control, development and long-term success of the Group. It is also responsible for instilling the appropriate culture, values and behaviour throughout the organisation.

There is a formal schedule of matters reserved to the Board for consideration and decision. This includes the matters set out in table 1 below.

Matters Reserved

to the Board

Table 1

Appointment of Directors

Strategic plans for the Group

Annual budget

Major acquisitions and disposals

Significant capital expenditure

Approval of the Annual Report

Approval of the Interim Results

Issuance of guarantees

The Group’s strategy, which is regularly reviewed by the Board, and its business model are summarised in the Strategic Report on pages 34 to 43.

The Board has delegated some of its responsibilities to Committees of the Board. The work of each Committee is set out on pages 97 to 131 of this Report. While

responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems has been delegated to theAudit Committee*, the Board retains ultimate responsibility for determining the Group’s “risk tolerance” and annually considers a report in relation to the monitoring, controlling and reporting of identified risks and uncertainties. In addition, the Board receives regular reports from the Chairman of theAudit Committee in relation to the work of that Committee in the area of risk management.

Individual Directors may seek independent professional advice, at the expense of the Company, in the furtherance of their duties as a Director.

The Group has a Directors’ and Officers’ Liability insurance policy in place.

How do the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive differ?

LOGO

It has been CRH’s practice since the formation of the Group in the 1970s that the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are not combined.

The Board has delegated responsibility for the management of the Group, through the Chief Executive, to executive management. There is a clear division of responsibilities between the roles of the Chairman and the Chief Executive, which is set out in writing and has been approved by the Board. A summary of the respective roles is set out in table 2 across.

What is the membership structure of the Board?

LOGO

It is CRH’s practice that a majority of the Board comprises non-executive Directors.

At present, there are 3 executive and 11** non-executive Directors. Biographical details are set out on pages 87 to 89. Non-executive Directors are expected to challenge management proposals constructively and to examine and review management performance in meeting agreed objectives and targets. In addition, they are expected to draw on their experience and knowledge in respect of any challenges facing the Group and in relation to the development of proposals on strategy.

We consider the current size and composition of the Board to be within a range which is appropriate. We also believe that the current size of the Board is sufficiently large to enable its Committees to operate without undue reliance on individual non-executive Directors, while being dynamic and responsive to the needs of the Group. The spread of nationalities of the Directors reflects the geographical reach of the Group and we consider that the Board as a whole has the appropriate blend of skills, knowledge and experience, from a wide range of industries, regions and backgrounds, necessary to lead the Group.

None of the executive Directors is a non-executive director of another listed company.

The current membership structure of the Board is set out in table 3 on page 93.

Chairmanis responsible for

Table 2

The efficient and effective working of the Board

Ensuring that Board agendas cover the key strategic issues confronting the Group, that the Board reviews and approves management’s plans for the Group and that the Directors receive accurate, timely, clear and relevant information

Making certain that the Board applies sufficient challenge to management proposals and examines and reviews management performance in meeting agreed objectives and targets

Overseeing the search for new Board members

Chief Executiveis responsible for

Full day-to-day operational and profit performance of the Group and accountability to the Board for all authority delegated to executive management

Executing strategy agreed with the Board and reporting regularly on the progress and performance of the Group

Co-ordinating and overseeing the profitable growth of the Group’s diverse portfolio of international businesses

Maximising the contribution of senior management to business planning, operational control and profit performance

*   In accordance with Regulation 91(6)(b) of the European Communities (Statutory Audits) (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.

** Will reduce to nine following the conclusion of the 2015 Annual General Meeting.

92      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

LOGO

How does the Board plan for succession and what is its policy on diversity?

LOGO

BUSINESS REVIEW -The Board plans for its own succession with the assistance of thePrior YearNomination & Corporate Governance Committee.

 

 

For non-executive appointments, independent consultants are normally engaged to search for suitable candidates. The process to identify, evaluate and appoint a non-executive Director with the suitable experience, skills and time commitment takes into account both the needs of CRH and the tenure and skills of existing Board members. As a result, Board renewal and the appointment of non-executive Directors is a continuous process. The process put in place

in respect of appointments made since the 2013 Annual Report was published is set out in the Chairman’s introduction to theNomination & Corporate GovernanceCommittee’s Report on pages 102 and 103.

External consultants are engaged for executive Director recruitment if, and when, required. In the case of the Chief Executive role, the Board appoints a succession committee of long standing non-executive Directors, when required. The incumbent Chief Executive generally acts as advisor to that committee.

We are committed to ensuring that the Board is sufficiently diverse and appropriately balanced. In its work in the area of Board renewal, theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee looks at the following four criteria when considering non-executive Director candidates:

international business experience, particularly in the regions in which the Group operates or into which it intends to expand;

skills, knowledge and expertise in areas relevant to the operation of the Board;

diversity, including nationality and gender; and

the need for an appropriately sized Board.

During the ongoing process of Board renewal, each, or a combination, of these factors can take priority.

In 2014, the Board set itself the goal of increasing the number of female Board members to circa 25% by the end of 2015. Following the 2015 Annual General Meeting, this objective will have been achieved.

What criteria are used to determine the independence of non-executive Directors?

LOGO

Table 1The Board considers the principles relating to independence contained in the 2012 Code, together with the guidance provided by a number of shareholder voting agencies, and takes into account a Director’s character, objectivity and integrity.

The independence of non-executive Board members is considered annually. The Board is assisted in this by the annual review carried out by the Senior Independent Director which addresses the independence of the individual members of the Board, and by the work of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee, which annually reviews each Board member’s directorships, and considers any relevant business relationships between Board members. We have concluded that all of the non-executive Directors bring independent judgement to bear on issues of strategy, performance, resources, key appointments and standards, and have determined that each of the non-executive Directors is independent.

When was the Chairman appointed and does he have non-CRH commitments?

LOGO

While the Chairman holds other directorships (see details on page 87), the Board considers that these do not interfere with the discharge of his duties to CRH.

Nicky Hartery was appointed Chairman of the Group in 2012. On his appointment as Chairman, he met the independence criteria

LOGO

CRH      93


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report| continued

set out in the 2012 Code. During 2014, Nicky joined the Board of a Canadian listed company. The Board has satisfied itself that this would not impact on his role as CRH Chairman.

In February 2015, the Board considered the outcome of the annual review, carried out by the Senior Independent Director, of the performance of the Chairman, whose initial term of office is due to expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting in May 2015. The Board, chaired by the Senior Independent Director for this purpose, resolved that Mr. Hartery’s term in office be extended for a further three years.

Who is the Senior Independent Director?

LOGO

The Senior Independent Director is available to shareholders who have concerns that cannot be addressed through the Chairman, Chief Executive or Finance Director.

Don McGovern was appointed as Senior Independent Director in January 2015.

Who is the Company Secretary?

LOGO

All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary, who is responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are complied with.

Neil Colgan was appointed Company Secretary in June 2009. The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary is a matter for the Board.

For what period are non-executive Directors appointed?

LOGO

Non-executive Directors are typically expected to serve two three-year terms, although they may be invited by the Board to serve for further periods.

The standard terms of the letter of appointment for non-executive Directors, which states that they are generally expected to serve two terms of three years, are available for inspection at the Company’s registered office and at the Annual General Meeting. A non-executive Director’s term of office is subject to his/her annual re-election by shareholders and the letter of appointment does not provide for any compensation for loss of office.

How are the induction, training and development needs of Directors catered for?

LOGO

The Chairman agrees a tailored and comprehensive induction programme with each new Director.

New Directors are provided with extensive briefing materials on the Group and its operations, the procedures relating to the Board and its Committees and their duties and responsibilities as Directors under legislation and regulations that apply to the Company.

A typical induction programme, which generally takes place over the first year of a Director’s appointment, would cover the topics set out in table 4 on page 95.

Sessions are held periodically with the Chairman at which progress is reviewed and feedback is sought.

For newly-appointed members of theAudit Committee, additional training arrangements include the topics set out in table 5 on page 95.

Members of theAudit Committee receive periodic updates on accounting developments.

Directors can also avail of opportunities to hear the views of, and meet with, the Group’s shareholders. Directors regularly receive copies of research and analysis conducted on CRH and the building materials sector. The Board receives regular updates from the external auditors in relation to regulatory and accounting developments. Updates in relation to other relevant matters, for example, changes in company law, are provided from time to time.

What processes are in place for appraising the performance of Directors and for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees?

LOGO

An annual review of individual Directors’ performance is conducted by the Chairman and each Director is provided with feedback gathered from other members of the Board.

The performance of individual Directors is assessed against a number of measures, including the ability of the Director to contribute to the development of strategy, to understand the major risks affecting the Group, to contribute to the cohesion of the Board, to commit the time required to fulfil

the role and to listen to and respect the views of other Directors and the management team. As part of that review process the Chairman discusses with each individual their training and development needs and, where appropriate, agrees suitable arrangements to be put in place to address those needs.

The Senior Independent Director conducts an annual review of Board effectiveness and the balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the Company on the Board, the operation and performance of the Chairman, the Board and its Committees and the effectiveness of Board communications. This is achieved through discussion in one-toone sessions with each Director, aided by the completion by each Director of a questionnaire in advance. The meetings, which cover specific topics and allow for free-ranging discussion, provide a forum for an open and frank discourse. The Senior Independent Director circulates a written report to the Board, which summarises the outcome of the review and sets out the key componentsany recommendations from Board members in relation to areas where improvements can be made. Consideration of the Group’s performanceSenior Independent Director’s report is a formal agenda item at a scheduled Board meeting.

When was the last external Board evaluation completed and what was the outcome?

LOGO

The 2012 evaluation was facilitated by ICSA Board Evaluation, which has an extensive record in 2010, analysing the changefacilitating evaluations in results from 2009 to 2010. Sales revenue for 2010 was broadlylarge listed companies both in line with 2009 at17.2 billion. EBITDA (as defined)* for the year, after once-off charges of100 million associated with our cost reduction programme, declined by 10% to1.6 billion while operating profit declined 27% to698 million. After impairment costs of124 million (2009:41 million), pre-tax profit declined by 27% to534 million.

Exchange Translation Effects

Currency movements had an overall positive impact on 2010 results, principally due to a strengthening of the US Dollar, the Swiss FrancIreland and the Polish Zloty. The average 2010 US$/UK. rate of 1.3257 was 5% stronger than in 2009 (1.3948), while the average Swiss Franc and Polish Zloty rates were 9% and 8% stronger respectively than in 2009.

Restructuring Costs

We continue to review and extend our cost reduction programme and we expect the initiatives taken in 2010, combined with the actions taken across the Group since 2007, to result in significant operational leverage when markets recover. Costs of100 million incurred in 2010 to implement these savings were105 million lower than last year (2009:205 million).

Ongoing Operations

Revenue from ongoing operations declined by1.2 billion (7%) on a like-for-like basis in 2010, with the reduction split broadly evenly between our Americas and Europe segments; this compares with a4.1 billion reduction (19%) in ongoing revenue in 2009. With lower sales volumes, price competition intensified in many of our markets, putting margins under pressure; however, tight management of the controllable cost base partly offset these negative impacts resulting in a decline of373 million in underlying operating profit; the corresponding decline in underlying operating profit in 2009 was708 million.

Finance Costs

Net finance costs of247 million were50 million lower than 2009 reflecting lower interest rates and lower debt levels.

Key Financial Performance Indicators

Some key financial performance indicators which, taken together, are a measure of performance and financial strength, are set out below.

 

    2010   2009 

Operating profit margin

   4.1%     5.5%  

EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio

   6.5x     6.1x  

Effective tax rate

   17.8%     18.3%  

Shareholder return

   -16%     22%  

Net debt as % of total equity

   33%     38%  

Net debt as % of market capitalisation

   32%     28%  

Operating Profit Margin

Overall operating profit margin forAn externally facilitated Board evaluation was carried out by an independent third party, ICSA Board Evaluation in 2012, the Group fell by 1.4 percentage pointsoutcome of which was very positive. The recommendations were reported in 2010 to 4.1%, reflecting the market conditions discussed above.2012 Corporate Governance Report, a copy of which is available on the CRH website. The next external evaluation will be conducted during 2015.

94      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

 

 

Induction Programme

Table 4

Board Members

Topic

Sessions with

Group strategy and finance:

–  Group strategy, the current challenges facing the Group and the trading backdrop

–  Financial reporting, trading results, acquisition models, funding sources/debt maturity, group treasury and credit rating metrics

Chief Executive, Finance Director, senior finance and treasury management

Divisional strategy and structure:

– Divisional strategy and organisational structure

– Development priorities

– IT strategy

Chief Executive, Heads of Divisions and senior operational management

Senior management team:

–  Succession planning

–  Leadership development programmes

–  Remuneration trends

Chief Executive and Group Human Resources and Talent Development Director

Directors’ legal duties and responsibilities:

–  Legal duties and responsibilities

–  Management of inside information

–  Dealings in CRH securities

–  Listing rule requirements

Finance Director, Company Secretary and the Group’s legal advisers

Compliance & ethics, health & safety, risk management, investor relations and remuneration:

–  Compliance & ethics policies and the structures in place to ensure ongoing compliance

–  Health & safety programme, including the fatality elimination programme, and the Group’s Corporate Social Responsibility policies

–  Investor Relations programme and the views of the Group’s major investors

–  Enterprise Risk Management, insurance arrangements and captive insurance programme

Finance Director, executives responsible for the relevant area, the Group’s stockbrokers and theRemuneration Committee’s remuneration advisors

Audit Committee

Table 5

Topic

Sessions with

External Audit

–  Audit planning

–  Auditors’ responsibilities

Finance Director, senior finance management, Head of Internal Audit and external auditors

Internal Audit

–  Strategy and workplan

–  IT audit

What are the requirements regarding the retirement and re-election of Directors?

LOGO

All Directors retire at each Annual General Meeting and, unless they are stepping down from the Board, submit themselves to shareholders for re-election.

Re-appointment of Directors retiring at Annual General Meetings is not automatic. Directors who are seeking re-election are subject to a satisfactory performance appraisal. All Directors are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company (a summary of provisions in the Memorandum and Articles of Association relating to the Directors is set out on pages 204 and 205).

How often does the Board meet?

LOGO

Details of the number of Board and Committee meetings during 2014, and of Directors’ attendance at those meetings, is set out in table 11 on page 104.

There were eight full meetings of the Board during 2014.

Each year, additional meetings, to consider specific matters, are held if and when required. Prior to their appointment, potential non-executive Directors are made aware of the calendar of meetings and are asked to confirm that they are able to allocate sufficient time to meet the expectations of their role. The agreement of the Chairman is required before a Director accepts additional commitments that might impact adversely on the time he or she is able to devote to CRH.

The Board typically makes two visits each year to Board operations; one in Europe and one in North America. Each visit lasts between three and five days and incorporates a scheduled Board meeting. In 2014, these visits were to Amsterdam in the Netherlands and Los Angeles in the United States.

How are Board agendas determined?

LOGO

The Chairman sets the agenda for each meeting in consultation with the Chief Executive and Company Secretary.

In setting the agendas, the Chairman ensures that sufficient time is allocated to strategy setting and review, performance monitoring, portfolio management, including acquisitions

LOGO

CRH      95


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report| continued

Typical Board Agenda Items

Table 6

Recurring items on each agenda:

–  Minutes

–  Board matters (including Board Committee updates)

–  Trading results

–  Acquisitions/Disposals/Capital Expenditure Projects

Periodic agenda items during the year:

–  Group strategy and Divisional strategy updates

–  Group budget

–  Full-year/interim financial results and reports

–  Investor interaction and feedback

–  Performance review of acquisitions against the original Board proposal following three years of Group ownership

–  Funding proposals

–  Human resources and succession planning

–  Risk management and internal controls

–  Compliance & Ethics

–  Health & Safety review, with a particular focus on the Group’s fatality elimination programme

–  Environmental review

and divestments, succession planning and talent management. Board agendas typically cover items set out in table 6 above.

The non-executive Directors regularly meet before or after each Board meeting without executives being present.

The papers for meetings are generally circulated electronically in the week prior to the meeting.

How does the Board ensure its reports are “Fair, Balanced and Understandable”?

LOGO

The Board collectively determines whether or not it is appropriate to include in the Annual Report a statement that the Board considers the document, taken as a whole, to be “Fair, Balanced and Understandable”.

The Group’s Financial Reporting and Disclosure Group (“FRADG”) reviews draft disclosures such as the annual and interim reports, and meets with the Finance Director to discuss proposed disclosures, in the context of whether draft reports fulfil the

criteria of being fair, balanced and understandable. The conclusions of the FRADG are reported to the Board. To ensure the Group’s disclosures are in line with evolving best practice in this area, the FRADG, which is made up of executives with responsibilities across a range of functions, regularly receives feedback from external experts who review published documents and provide guidance regarding developments. In the case of the Annual Report, to facilitate each Director’s individual review, the draft document is circulated to Board members circa two weeks prior to the finalisation of the report.

Are the Directors subject to securities dealing policies or codes?

LOGO

Directors are required to obtain clearance from the Chairman and Chief Executive before dealing in CRH securities.

Details of the CRH shares held by Directors are set out on page 121.

CRH has a policy on dealings in securities that applies to all Directors and senior management. Directors and senior management are prohibited from dealing in CRH securities during designated prohibited periods and at any time at which the individual is in possession of inside information (as defined in the Market Abuse (Directive 2003/6/EC) Regulations 2005). The policy adopts the terms of the Model Code, as set out in the Listing Rules published by the UK Listing Authority subject to amendments in relation to Irish company law and taxation references.

What are the Committees of the Board?

LOGO

The Board has established five permanent Committees to assist in the execution of its responsibilities.

The current permanent Committees1 of the Board are theAcquisitions Committee, theAudit Committee, theFinance Committee, theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee and theRemuneration Committee.

In addition, ad-hoc Committees are formed from time to time to deal with specific matters. Each of the permanent Committees has terms of reference, under which authority is delegated to them by the Board. The Chairman of each Committee reports to the

Board on its deliberations and minutes of all Committee meetings are circulated to all Directors.

The current membership of each Committee and each member’s length of service is set out in the relevant sections in the remainder of this report. Attendance at meetings held in 2014 is set out in table 11 on page 104.

Chairmen of the Committees attend the Annual General Meeting and are available to answer questions from shareholders.

1

The Terms of Reference of these Committees comply fully with the 2012 Code requirements; CRH considers that they are generally responsive to the relevant NYSE rules but may not address all aspects of these rules.

96      CRH


Audit Committee

TheAudit Committee currently consists of four non-executive Directors considered by the Board to be independent1. The biographical details of each member are set out on pages 87 to 89. Together the members of the Committee bring a broad range of experience and expertise from a wide range of industries which is vital in supporting effective governance.

The primary responsibilities of the Committee are to:

–  monitor the financial reporting process, the integrity of the financial statements, including the Annual and Interim Reports, preliminary results announcements, interim management statements and any other formal announcement relating to the financial performance of the Company, and to review significant financial reporting issues and judgements exercised in the preparation thereof;

–  monitor the audit of the financial statements;

–  keep under review the effectiveness of the Company’s internal financial controls and the internal control and risk management systems and review and approve statements to be included in the Annual Report regarding internal control and risk management;

–  review the Company’s arrangements for its employees to raise concerns, in confidence, about possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters and review the Company’s procedures and systems for detecting fraud and preventing bribery;

–  keep under review the adequacy of the Group’s compliance and ethics function;

–  monitor and review the effectiveness of the internal audit function;

–  review the effectiveness of the audit process and the independence and objectivity of the external auditors;

–  develop and monitor the policy on non-audit services to be provided by the external auditors;

–  approve the remuneration and terms of engagement of the external auditors;

–  make recommendations to the Board in relation to the appointment or removal of the external auditor;

–  report to the Board on how it has discharged its responsibilities.

The responsibilities of theAudit Committee are set out in full in its Terms of Reference, which are available on the CRH website, www.crh.com.

1   The Board has determined that all of the non-executive Directors on the Audit Committee are independent according to the requirements of Rule 10A 3 of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

LOGO

Chairman’s overview

On behalf of theAudit Committee, I am pleased to introduce theAudit Committee Report for the year ended 31 December 2014. The non-executive Directors who were members of the Committee during 2014, together with their record of attendance at Committee meetings, are identified in table 11 on page 104. A summary of recent and upcoming changes to the membership of theAudit Committee is set out in the Chairman’s overview section of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee Report on page 103.

Financial Reporting and External Audit

In July 2014, the Committee met with Ernst & Young to agree the 2014 external audit plan. Table 7 on page 99 outlines the key areas identified as being potentially significant and how they were addressed by the Committee.

Impairment Testing / Accounting for Divestments

The Committee reviewed management’s goodwill impairment testing methodology and process, through discussion with both management and Ernst & Young, and found the methodology to be robust and the results of the testing process appropriate. The Committee also reviewed the re-assessment of the carrying value of the business units identified for divestment in 2013 (in respect of which an impairment charge of €683 million was recorded in the 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements). No goodwill impairments or reversal of previous impairments were recorded during the year (see note 14 on pages 159 to 161 for more details). However, a number of the business units identified for divestment met the ‘held for sale’ criteria contained within IFRS 5Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations at 31 December 2014 and have been re-classified as such in the Consolidated Financial Statements (see note 4 on page 151 for more details).

LOGO

CRH      97


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report |continued

Enterprise Risk Management

During 2014 the Committee received and considered an update from management on progress in respect of the ongoing development of the Group’s enterprise risk management framework, which included detailed reports identifying the key risks at Divisional and Group level and the related mitigation steps. The Committee also considered an annual report on the assessment of risk management and internal control systems. This had regard to all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls that could affect the Group’s business. Further details in relation to the Group’s risk management and internal control systems are set out on page 105.

External Auditors

Ernst & Young have been the Group’s auditors since 1988. In last year’s report, I informed shareholders that the Committee had deferred making a decision on the timeframe for putting the external audit out to tender until the finalisation of EU legislation on the reform of the audit sector. This EU legislation, which includes a requirement for mandatory auditor rotation and will necessitate, in the case of CRH, an audit tender by the end of 2020, was enacted in June 2014. However, taking into account the differing requirements of the EU legislation and the 2012 Code (the current provision in the 2012 Code which would require a tender process in 2015 remains in place), and the organisational change in Europe (see page 16), the Committee has determined that it is not in the best interests of the Group to carry-out a tender at this time. The Committee will continue to review this position on an ongoing basis. In the interim, the Committee has again recommended to Board that the continuance in office of Ernst & Young should be subject to a non-binding

advisory vote at the 2015 Annual General Meeting.

Further details in relation to the external auditors, including information on how auditor objectivity and independence are maintained and how the effectiveness of the external audit is assessed, are included on pages 100 and 101.

Audit Committee Effectiveness and Priorities for 2015

During 2014 the Committee, together with the Finance Director and Company Secretary, carried out a review of the operation of the Committee. This involved an assessment of the Committee’s primary role and responsibilities, training arrangements for Committee members, the time allocated for consideration of key issues, the format and content of the information provided to the Committee and the priorities for 2015 and onwards. A number of helpful recommendations resulted from the process which I believe will further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Committee.

The key areas of focus for the Committee in 2015 will be on internal control, external audit planning, IT governance, cyber security and risk management.

Ernst Bärtschi

Audit Committee Chairman

98      CRH


Corporate Governance Report |continued

Audit Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theAudit Committee are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

E.J. Bärtschi3 years
H.A. McSharry3 years
H. Th. Rottinghuis0.75 years

Mr. P.J. Kennedy joined the Committee with effect from 25 February 2015.

Mr. E.J. Bärtschi has been designated by the Board as the Committee’s Financial Expert.

The Committee reviewed its Terms of Reference in December 2014 and determined that no changes were required. The Terms of Reference, which were last updated in December 2013, are available on the CRH website.

Committee meetings

The Committee met ten times during 20141, with meetings held to coincide with key dates in the financial reporting and audit cycle. The Finance Director and the Head of Internal Audit generally attend Committee meetings. The external auditors, Ernst & Young, attend the majority of meetings and have direct access to the Chairman of the Committee. The Group Chairman, Chief Executive and other senior finance personnel attend meetings (or for particular agenda items) at the invitation of the Committee. During 2014, the Committee met with the Head of Internal Audit, and separately with the external auditors, in the absence of management. A typical calendar of meetings, which includes a general outline of the main agenda items, is set out in table 8 on page 100.

In February each year, the Chairman of the Committee formally reports to the Board on how the Committee has discharged its responsibilities in respect of the prior financial year.

Internal Audit

The Head of Internal Audit attends the majority of the meetings of theAudit Committee. The Committee agrees the Internal Audit strategy, its charter and the annual workplan, which is developed on a risk-based approach.

1Attendance by non-independent Directors and management is by invitation only.

Areas identified for focus during the 2014 Audit Planning Process

Table 7

Area of Focus

Audit Committee Action
Impairment of goodwill

For the purposes of its annual impairment testing process, the Group assesses the recoverable amount of each of CRH’s cash-generating units (CGUs – see details in note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) based on a value-in-use computation. The annual goodwill impairment testing was conducted by management and papers outlining the methodology and assumptions used in, and the results of, that assessment were presented to theAudit Committee. Following its deliberations, theAudit Committee was satisfied that the methodology used by management (which was consistent with prior years) and the results of the assessment, together with the disclosures in note 14, were appropriate.

A separate assessment was carried out in 2014 in respect of the business units identified in 2013 for divestment as part of the Group- wide portfolio review initiated in November of that year. A total impairment charge of683 million (of which315 million related to goodwill) was recorded in the 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements. The valuation of each business unit (based on the estimated fair value less costs of disposal) at year-end 2013 was reassessed in 2014 on a standalone CGU basis. The revised valuations were then compared with the carrying value of each business. TheAudit Committee reviewed and considered the methodology used by management in the reassessment process and was satisfied that it was appropriate.

Impairment of property, plant and   equipment and financial assets

In addition to the goodwill impairment testing process discussed above, the Group also annually assesses the need for impairment of other non-current assets (property, plant and equipment and financial assets) as and when indicators of impairment exist. TheAudit Committee considered the methodology used by management in that process and was satisfied that it was appropriate.

Divestments – appropriate application of IFRS 5Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

In 2013, the Group announced that it had identified a number of business units for divestment globally. None of these businesses met the ‘held for sale’ criteria at 31 December 2013. However, the status of the businesses identified for divestment evolved during 2014 and those businesses which met the ‘held for sale’ criteria at 31 December 2014 have been reclassified as such in the Consolidated Financial Statements (see note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details). Following detailed discussions with management and Ernst & Young, theAudit Committee was satisfied that the treatment in 2014 was appropriate.

Contract revenue recognition

IAS 11Construction Contracts requires revenue and expenses to be recognised on uncompleted contracts, with the underlying principle that, once the outcome of a long-term construction contract can be reliably estimated, revenue and expenses associated with that contract should be recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract activity at the balance sheet date. If it is anticipated that the contract will be loss-making, the expected loss must be recognised immediately. Following discussions with management and Ernst & Young, theAudit Committee was satisfied that contract revenue recognition was not a material issue for the Group in 2014 as the majority of contracts were completed within the financial year.

LOGO

CRH        99


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report| continued

Typical Audit Committee Calendar

Table 8

MeetingActivity

Attendees by invitation
(in addition to the Finance Director and the Head of Internal Audit)

February

–  Consideration of the financial statements (including the report from the external auditors on Integrated Audit Results and Communications)

–  Approval of external audit fee

–  Annual review of external auditor independence

–  Annual assessment of risk management and internal control systems

–  Approval of Internal Audit workplan

–  Review of reports on the operation of the CRH Code of Business Conduct, the Competition/Anti-trust Compliance Code and the arrangements in place to enable employees to raise concerns, in confidence, in relation to possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters

–  Enterprise Risk Management Review

Chief Executive and executives responsible for the relevant areas
March

–  Review of Annual Report onForm 20-F

Senior finance personnel

May

–  Review of interim management statement1

Group Chairman and Chief Executive

June

–  Meeting with Finance Director, Europe

–  Cyber Security Update

Senior Europe finance personnel

July

–  Preliminary consideration of interim results

–  Approval of the external audit plan

–  Updates on accounting and auditing developments

–  Update on Internal Audit work/activities

–  Annual review of Committee effectiveness

–  Enterprise Risk Management Review

Chief Executive and executives responsible for the relevant areas
August

–  Review of interim results announcement

Group Chairman and Chief Executive

September

–  Meeting with the Chief Financial Officer for the Americas

–  Preliminary review of goodwill impairment and sensitivity analysis

–  Cyber Security Update

Senior Americas finance personnel
October

–  Enterprise Risk Management Review

–  Preliminary review of interim management statement

–  Pensions Update

Executives responsible for the relevant areas
November

–  Review of interim management statement1

Group Chairman and Chief Executive

December

–  Review of outcome of goodwill impairment and sensitivity analysis

–  Update on Internal Audit work/activities

–  Enterprise Risk Management Review

–  Approval of non-audit fees provided by external auditors

–  Review of the Committee’s performance and Terms of Reference

Senior finance personnel

¹   A Committee of the Group Chairman, Audit Committee Chairman, Chief Executive and Finance Director are authorised from time to time to review and approve the release of interim management statements.

The Head of Internal Audit reports to theAudit Committee on the findings of internal audit reviews and related follow-ups and the outcome of control testing in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 20022.

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the resources allocated to IT Audit. The Committee meets regularly with the senior IT Audit Manager to discuss IT Audit strategy, the key areas of focus and agrees the annual IT Audit workplan.

Assessments of the Internal Audit function have been carried out periodically by management and validated by an independent third party assessor. An external assessment, which principally involved a series of interviews with key stakeholders throughout the organisation, including the members of theAudit Committee, was commenced in December 2014. The results of that assessment will be presented to theAudit Committee for consideration in the first half of 2015.

Risk management and internal controls

The Board has delegated responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to theAudit Committee. Further details in relation to the Committee’s work in this area are set out in the section on Risk Management and Internal Controls on page 105.

External Auditors

There are no contractual obligations which act to restrict the Committee’s choice of external auditor. The Committee periodically considers the risk of withdrawal by Ernst & Young from the market and the potential impact on the Group, were that eventuality to materialise.

TheAudit Committee has put in place safeguards to ensure that the independence of the audit is not compromised. Such safeguards include:

seeking confirmation from the external auditors that they are, in their professional judgement, independent from the Group;

obtaining from the external auditors an account of all relationships between the auditors and the Group;

2A copy of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 can be obtained from the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s website www.sec.gov.

100      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

LOGO

monitoring the Group’s policy prohibiting the employment of former staff of the external auditors, who were part of the CRH audit team, in senior management positions with the Group until two years have elapsed since the completion of the audit;

monitoring the number of former employees of the external auditors currently employed in senior positions in the Group and assessing whether those appointments impair, or appear to impair, the external auditors’ judgement or independence;

considering whether, taken as a whole, the various relationships between the Group and the external auditors impair, or appear to impair, the auditors’ judgement or independence;

reviewing the economic importance of the Group to the external auditors and assessing whether that importance impairs, or appears to impair, the external auditors’ judgement or independence.

The Group external audit engagement partner is replaced every five years and other senior audit staff are rotated every seven years.

The Group has a policy governing the conduct of non-audit work by the auditors1. The policy, which was updated in 2012, is available on the CRH website. Under the policy, the external auditors are prohibited from performing services where they:

may be required to audit their own work;

participate in activities that would normally be undertaken by management;

are remunerated through a ‘success fee’ structure; and

act in an advocacy role for the Group.

Other than the above, the Group does not impose an automatic ban on the external auditors undertaking non-audit work. The external auditors are permitted to provide non-audit services that are not, or are not perceived to be, in conflict with auditor independence or prohibited by Rule 2-01 of SEC Regulation S-X, provided they have the skill and competence to carry out the work and are considered by the Committee to be the most appropriate party to undertake such work in the best interests of the Group.

The engagement of the external auditors to provide any non-audit services must be pre-approved by theAudit Committee or entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Committee. The pre-approval policy specifies the services that are prohibited and the services which have general pre-approval. The Committee has delegated to the Finance Director responsibility for confirming whether a service, which has general pre-approval, can be provided by Ernst & Young. In addition, Internal Audit reviews the pre-approval process to ensure that it is robust in addressing the requirements of the PCAOB and does not impinge on Ernst & Young’s independence. The Finance Director reports regularly to the Committee on services which have been approved.

In 2014, the external auditors provided a number of audit-related services, including Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 attestation, and non-audit services, including due diligence services associated with proposed acquisitions and disposals. Ernst & Young were also engaged during 2014 in a number of jurisdictions in which the Group operates to provide help with local tax compliance, advice on taxation laws and other related matters; assignments which typically involve relatively small fees. TheAudit Committee is satisfied that the external auditors’ knowledge of the Group was an important factor in choosing them to provide these services. The Committee is also satisfied that the fees paid to Ernst & Young for non-audit work, which amounted to

1The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval.

11% of the total fee in 2014, did not compromise their independence or integrity. Details of the amounts paid to the external auditors during the year for audit and other services are set out in note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 150.

TheAudit Committee’s primary means of assessing the effectiveness of the external audit process is by monitoring performance against the agreed audit plan. In addition, each year the Committee considers (i) the experience and knowledge of the Ernst & Young audit team; (ii) the results of post-audit interviews with management and theAudit Committee Chairman; (iii) the transparency reports issued under EU regulations by Ernst & Young Ireland; and (iv) where applicable, relevant reports by regulatory bodies on the performance of Ernst & Young. These annual procedures are supplemented by periodic formal reviews of the performance of Ernst & Young, the most recent of which took place in late 2014. The 2014 review captured the views of relevant stakeholders across the Group and members of the Committee. The preliminary results indicated a high level of satisfaction with Ernst & Young and the services provided by them to CRH. TheAudit Committee will consider a full report on the findings and recommendations arising from the review in the first half of 2015.

LOGO

CRH      101


Nomination & Corporate

Governance Committee

The Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee consists of four non-executive Directors.

The primary responsibilities of the Committee are:

–  regularly reviewing the size, structure and composition (including skills, knowledge, experience and diversity) of the Board and making recommendations to the Board regarding any changes;

–  giving consideration to succession planning for Directors and senior executives;

–  identifying and recommending candidates to fill Board vacancies;

–  in respect of the appointment of a chairman, preparing a job specification including the time commitment expected;

–  keeping under review the leadership needs of the organisation;

–  approving the terms of reference for external board evaluations;

–  keeping under review corporate governance developments with the aim of ensuring that CRH’s governance policies and practices continue to be in line with best practice;

–  ensuring that the principles and provisions set out in the 2012 Code (and any other governance code that applies to the Company) are observed;

–  reviewing the disclosures and statements made in the Corporate Governance Report to shareholders.

The responsibilities of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee are set out in full in its Terms of Reference, which are available on the CRH website, www.crh.com.

LOGO

Chairman’s overview

Board Renewal

TheNomination & Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews the Board’s skill mix, experience and tenure in order that the renewal process is orderly and planned. A skills matrix has been developed to aid this process and is used by the Committee. During 2014, and to date in 2015, the Committee identified and recommended to the Board that the following individuals be appointed as non-executive Directors:

–    Pat Kennedy, appointed with effect from 1 January 2015; and

–    Lucinda Riches, appointed with effect from 1 March 2015.

The search criteria for these appointments included candidates with a Chief Executive or senior management background who had general industry, emerging markets and, in the context of recent and impending Board retirements, finance, investment banking or private equity experience.

Biographies for Pat Kennedy and Lucinda Riches are included on pages 88 and 89. The Committee worked with Korn/Ferry in relation to the appointment of Lucinda. Korn/Ferry has no other connection with the Company. We did not use the services of a recruitment agency in relation to the appointment of Pat; he had been identified as a candidate for a non-executive Director a number of years ago. At that time he was Executive Chairman of SHV Holdings, a large family owned multi-national based in the Netherlands. We remained in contact with him and when he retired from his executive role at SHV he met with all of the current members of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee and a number of other Board members. He brings to CRH wide experience in a range of industries, emerging markets and the provision of private equity. Lucinda has significant experience in equity and capital markets both in London and New York. While she worked for the majority of her career up to 2007 in UBS, the Company’s broker, the Committee is satisfied that no issues of independence arise.

102        CRH


Ernst Bärtschi was appointed to the Board in 2011 and Heather Ann McSharry was appointed in 2012. They completed their first three year terms as non-executive Directors in November 2014 and February 2015 respectively. Following a performance review, on the recommendation of the Committee, the Board has asked Ernst and Heather Ann to each continue on the Board for a further three year term.

Following the appointment of Lucinda Riches, female Directors will represent 25% of the Board after the conclusion of the 2015 Annual General Meeting. TheNomination & Corporate Governance Committee will continue to retain gender diversity as a key factor to consider in all Board appointments for the foreseeable future.

Board Committees / Senior Independent Director

On the recommendation of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has appointed Don McGovern as Chairman of theRemuneration Committee, with effect from March 2015. Don succeeds Dan O’Connor, who will remain on the Committee until his retirement at the conclusion of the 2015 Annual

General Meeting. Don also succeeds Dan as Senior Independent Director. A summary of recent changes to the Board’s Committees are set out in table 10 below.

Voting at General Meetings

The Committee reviewed the voting outcome at the 2014 Annual General Meeting and concluded that there was no issue or pattern in voting which was unexplained or warranted discussion with individual shareholders.

Nicky Hartery

Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee Chairman

   Summary of Board Committee Changes

Table 10 

Acquisitions

Audit

Finance

Nomination

Remuneration

Ernst Bärtschi-M(Ch)D--
John KennedyD-Doo
Pat KennedyDD---

Albert Manifold

M-o--

Don McGovern

-o-DD (Ch)
Heather Ann  McSharry  -MD--

Dan O’Connor

-o-MM(prev. Ch)
Henk Rottinghuis  DM---
Lucinda Riches---DD

D = Appointed to committee; o = ceased to be a committee member; (Ch) = committee Chairman;

- = not applicable or no change;M = continuing member

LOGO

CRH      103


LOGO

Corporate Governance Report| continued

Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

W. P. Egan7.5 years
N. Hartery10.5 years
D. McGovern0.25 years
D. O’Connor2.5 years

Ms. L. Riches joined theNomination &Corporate Governance Committee following her appointment to the Board on 1 March 2015.

The factors taken into account by theNomination & Corporate Governance Committee in considering the composition of the Board are set out in the policy for Board renewal which is detailed on page 93.

The Committee reviewed its Terms of Reference in December 2014 and determined that no changes were required. The Terms of Reference, which were last updated in December 2013, are available on the CRH website.

Remuneration Committee

The Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 108 to 131 contains an overview of the responsibilities and activities of theRemuneration Committee during 2014.

Under its Terms of Reference, theRemuneration Committee must be made up of at least three members, all of whom must be independent non-executive Directors. Members of the Committee can serve for up to a maximum of three terms of three years. The Group Chairman may be a member of the Committee provided he was independent on appointment as Chairman and the Board

continues to consider him to be independent. Only members of the Committee have the right to attend Committee meetings. However, other individuals such as the Chairman, if not a member of the Committee, the Chief Executive, the Group Human Resources and Talent Development Director and external advisers may be invited to attend for all or part of any meeting as and when appropriate. The Chief Executive is fully consulted about remuneration proposals.

Remuneration Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theRemuneration Committee are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

W. P. Egan7.5 years
N. Hartery10.5 years
D. McGovern0.25 years
D. O’Connor2.5 years

Ms. L. Riches joined theRemuneration Committee following her appointment to the Board on 1 March 2015.

The Committee reviewed its Terms of Reference in December 2014 and determined that no changes were required. The Terms of Reference, which were last updated in December 2013, are available on the CRH website.

Acquisitions Committee

Acquisitions Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theAcquisitions Committee are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

N. Hartery2.5 years
M. Carton4.5 years
U-H. Felcht3.0 years
J.W. Kennedy0.5 years
A. Manifold6.0 years

Mr. P. Kennedy and Mr. H. Rottinghuis were appointed to the Committee on 25 February 2015.

The attendance atAcquisitions Committeemeetings is set out in table 11 below.

Role and Responsibilities

TheAcquisitions Committee has been delegated authority by the Board to approve acquisitions and disposals and large capital expenditure projects up to agreed limits.

Finance Committee

Finance Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theFinance Committeeare set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

N. Hartery2.5 years
M. Carton4.5 years
U-H. Felcht7.5 years
J.W. Kennedy0.5 years

Mr. E.J. Bärtschi and Ms. H.A. McSharry were appointed to the Committee on 25 February 2015.

The attendance atFinance Committeemeetings is set out in table 11 below.

Role and Responsibilities

TheFinance Committee is responsible for:

advising the Board on the financial requirements of the Group and on

 

 

Attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings during the year ended 31 December 2014

 

  

 

 

 

 

Table 11

 

 

  

 

     

 

Board

 

  Acquisitions  Audit  Finance  Nomination  Remuneration 
   No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  
   Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total   Attended  
 

E.J. Bärtschi

  8  8        10  10                    
 

M. Carton

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

W.P. Egan

  8  7                    7  7  8   8  
 

U-H. Felcht

  8  7  8  8        7  7              
 

N. Hartery

  8  8  8  8        7  7  7  7  8   8  
 

J.M. de Jong*

  2  2  1  1        2  2              
 

J.W. Kennedy

  8  8  2  2              5  5  7   7  
 

D.A. McGovern, Jr.  

  8  8        10  10                    
 

H.A. McSharry

  8  8        10  10                    
 

A. Manifold

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

D.N. O’Connor

  8  8        5  5        7  7  8   8  
 

H. Th. Rottinghuis**

  8  8        5  4                    
 

M.S. Towe

  8  8                                
 *   Retired May 2014        
 ** Appointed to Board February 2014        
 

Note: See summary of Board Committee changes in table 10 on page 103.

 

        

104      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

appropriate funding arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to the issue and buy-back of shares and debt instruments and on the Group’s financing arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to dividend levels on the Ordinary Shares;

keeping the Board advised of the financial implications of Board decisions in relation to acquisitions;

assisting management, at their request, in considering any financial or taxation aspect of the Group’s affairs; and

reviewing the Group’s insurance arrangements.

Risk Management and Internal Control

The Board has delegated responsibility for the monitoring of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to theAudit Committee1. Such systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and, in the case of internal control systems, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared subject to oversight and control of the Finance Director, ensuring correct data is captured from Group locations and all required information for disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements is provided. An appropriate control framework has been put in place around the recording of appropriate eliminating journals and other adjustments. The Consolidated Financial Statements are reviewed by the CRH Financial Reporting and Disclosure Group prior to being reviewed by theAudit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Directors confirm that the Group’s ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing its principal risks and uncertainties (as outlined on pages 52 to 63) is in accordance with the updated Turnbull guidance(Internal Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code) published in October 2005. The process has been in place throughout the accounting period and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and financial statements.

Group management has responsibility for major strategic development and financing decisions. Responsibility for operational issues is devolved, subject to limits of authority, to product group and operating company management. Management at all levels is responsible for internal control over the business functions that have been delegated. This embedding of the system of internal control throughout the Group’s operations ensures that the organisation is capable of responding quickly to evolving business risks, and that significant internal control issues,

should they arise, are reported promptly to appropriate levels of management.

During the year, the Board andAuditCommitteereceived, on a regular basis, reports from management on the key risks to the business and the steps being taken to manage such risks. They also considered whether the significant risks faced by the Group were being identified, evaluated and appropriately managed, having regard to the balance of risk, cost and opportunity. In addition, theAudit Committee met with internal auditors on a regular basis and satisfied itself as to the adequacy of the Group’s internal control system; met with the Chairman of theRemuneration Committee to ensure that the Group’s remuneration policies and structures were appropriate and in line with the Group’s risk tolerance; and reviewed the principal risks and uncertainties outlined on pages 52 to 63. TheAudit Committee also met with, and received reports from, the external auditors. The Chairman of theAudit Committee reported regularly to the Board on all significant issues considered by the Committee and the minutes of its meetings were circulated to all Directors.

The Directors confirm that, in addition to the monitoring carried out by theAudit Committee under its Terms of Reference, they have reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems up to and including the date of approval of the financial statements. This had regard to all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls that could affect the Group’s business.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In accordance with the requirements of Rule 13a-15 of the US Securities Exchange Act, the following report is provided by management in respect of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,

and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the US Securities Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our Company’s published Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes under generally accepted accounting principles.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission.

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company has elected to exclude an assessment of the internal controls of acquisitions made during the year 2014. These acquisitions, which are listed in note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, constituted 0.7% of total assets and 1.2% of net assets, as of 31 December 2014 and 0.6% and 0.8% of revenue and Group profit for the financial year, respectively, for the year then ended.

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this assessment, management has concluded and hereby reports that as of 31 December 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our auditors, Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, who have audited the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014, have audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Their report, on which an unqualified opinion is expressed thereon, is included on page 134.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During 2014, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that

1 In accordance with Regulation 91(6)(b) of the European Communities (Statutory Audits) (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.

LOGO

CRH      105


Corporate Governance Report| continued

LOGO

has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) as of 31 December 2014. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive and the Finance Director have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date at the level of providing reasonable assurance.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management, including the Chief Executive and the Finance Director, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Compliance & Ethics

The Group Compliance & Ethics (C&E) programme continues to develop in scope and reach. The structure of the C&E organisation was realigned in 2014 to serve the new CRH Europe organisation. A CRH Europe Head of C&E was appointed from the existing Compliance pool. Business Unit Compliance Coordinators (BUCCs) were also appointed for Heavyside East, Heavyside West, Lightside and Distribution and a European Compliance Officer was appointed to assist the European Head of C&E.

CRH’s Code of Business Conduct1 (COBC) and related policies were updated and approved by the Board and the C&E team’s primary focus since then has been to ensure all relevant employees receive appropriate training. In the current training cycle over 32,000 employees have participated in COBC training and a further 11,000 have also undertaken advanced instruction on competition law and anti-bribery, corruption and fraud.

In addition, our development teams and procurement teams have received appropriate instruction on both our C&E Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Venture Due Diligence Programme and our Ethical Procurement Code. Our Supplier Code of Conduct was developed to communicate our minimum Corporate Social Responsibility requirements to existing and new suppliers to the Group and to outline how we ensure compliance with these requirements. Similar procedures have been developed for any engagements

Investor Relations Activities

Table 12

Formal Announcements,including the release of the annual and interim results and the issuance of interim management statements. These announcements are typically accompanied by presentations and webcasts or conference calls.
Investor Roadshows,typically held following the release of formal announcements, provide an opportunity for the management team to meet existing and/or potential investors in a concentrated set of meetings.
Industry Conferences:Attendance at key sector and investor conferences affords members of the senior management team the opportunity to engage with key investors and analysts.
Investor Briefings:In addition to regular contact with investors and analysts during the year, the Company periodically holds capital market days, which include presentations on various aspects of CRH’s operations and strategy and provide an opportunity for investors and analysts to meet with CRH’s wider management team.

Media Briefings:Each year, the Company provides media briefings on numerous issues.

with business partners. Further guidelines developed during the year include a Competition Law Toolbox – which gathers into one place various CRH guidelines, policies and notes to help the businesses comply with Competition Law requirements.

The following existing policies are under review;

The Competition/Antitrust Compliance Code
The Donations Policy
The Anti-Fraud Policy

The COBC has scored an “A” rating by New York Stock Exchange Governance Services and incorporates some welcome new features, including learning aids, an ethical-decision making guide and a clear focus on the core values of the Group: Integrity, Honesty and Respect for the law. It was translated and distributed during 2014 and related training is being migrated to an on-line module. A robust communication plan is in place to complement the training programme. A multi-lingual “hotline” facility – “Speak Up” is also available to employees as a secure channel to report ethical issues that concern them or suspected violations of our Codes. All hotline reports received are fully reviewed and investigated by appropriately qualified personnel.

The C&E programme has been integrated into our standard Internal Audit procedures and forms part of an annual management certification process. Its effectiveness is also regularly reviewed by the C&E function with appropriate oversight from senior management and theAudit Committee. The collective goal is to ensure the message is clearly understood that at CRH “there is never a good business reason to do the wrong thing”.

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) concepts are embedded in all CRH operations and activities.

Excellence in the areas ofhealth & safety, environment & climate change, governance and people & community is a daily priority of line management. The Group’s policies and implementation systems are summarised on pages 47 to 51. During 2014, CRH was again recognised by several leading socially responsible investment (SRI) agencies as being among the leaders in its sector in these important areas.

Communications with Shareholders

Communications with shareholders are given high priority and the Group devotes considerable time and resources each year to shareholder engagement. We recognise the importance of effective dialogue as an integral element of good corporate governance. The Investor Relations team, together with the Chief Executive, Finance Director and other senior executives, meet regularly with institutional shareholders (each year covering over 50% of shareholder base). Detailed reports on the issues covered in those meetings and the views of shareholders are circulated to the Board after each group of meetings. Table 12 above provides a brief outline of the nature of the activities undertaken by our Investor Relations team.

During 2014, the Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary participated in a number of conference calls with some of the Group’s major shareholders in advance of the 2014 Annual General Meeting. The meetings were organised to provide those shareholders with an opportunity to discuss the resolutions on the 2014 Annual General Meeting agenda and corporate governance matters generally.

In addition to the above, major acquisitions are notified to the Stock Exchanges in accordance with the requirements of the Listing Rules and development updates, giving details of other acquisitions completed and major capital expenditure projects, are issued periodically (typically in January and July each year).

In addition, we respond throughout the year to

1

The Code of Business Conduct is applicable to all Group employees including the Chief Executive and senior financial officers. The Code promotes honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures and compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations and complies with the applicable code of ethics regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

106      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

correspondence from shareholders on a wide range of issues.

The Chief Executive made a presentation to shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting on CRH’s businesses.

General Meetings

The Company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM), which is held in Ireland, affords individual shareholders the opportunity to question the Chairman and the Board. All Directors attended the 2014 AGM. The Notice of the AGM, which specifies the time, date, place and the business to be transacted, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. At the meeting, resolutions are voted on by way of a poll using an electronic voting system. The votes of shareholders present at the meeting are added to the proxy votes received in advance and the total number of votes for, against and withheld for each resolution are announced. This information is made available on the Company’s website following the meeting.

All other general meetings are called Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs). An EGM called for the passing of a special resolution requires at least 21 clear days’ notice.

A quorum for a general meeting of the Company is constituted by five or more shareholders present in person and entitled to vote. The passing of resolutions at a meeting of the Company, other than special resolutions, requires a simple majority. To be passed, a special resolution requires a majority of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Shareholders have the right to attend, speak, ask questions and vote at general meetings. In accordance with Irish company law, the Company specifies record dates for general meetings, by which date shareholders must be registered in the Register of Members of the Company to be entitled to attend. Record dates are specified in the notes to the notice of a general meeting. Shareholders may exercise their right to vote by appointing, by electronic means or in writing, a proxy/proxies to vote some or all of their shares. The requirements for the receipt of valid proxy forms are set out in the notes to the notice convening the meeting and in the notes on the proxy form. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 5% of the issued share capital of the Company, has the right to requisition a general meeting. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 3% of the issued share capital of the Company, has the right to put an item on the agenda of an AGM or to table a draft resolution for inclusion in the agenda of a general meeting, subject to any contrary provision in Irish company law.

Going Concern

The Company’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Strategy Review section on pages 34 to 43. The financial position of the Company, its cash flows, liquidity position

and borrowing facilities are described in the Business Performance Review on pages 66 to 76. In addition, notes 20 to 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements include the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit, currency and liquidity risks.

The Company has considerable financial resources and a large number of customers and suppliers across different geographic areas and industries. In addition, the local nature of building materials means that the Group’s products are not usually shipped cross-border.

Having assessed the relevant business risks, the Directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage these risks successfully, and they have a reasonable expectation that the Company, and the Group as a whole, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Compliance Statement

Non-US companies such as CRH are exempt from most of the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. In common with companies listed on the Irish Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, CRH’s corporate governance practices reflect, inter alia, compliance with (a) domestic company law; (b) the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority and the Irish Stock Exchange; and (c) the Code, which is appended to the listing rules of the London and Irish Stock Exchanges.

CRH has adopted a robust set of Board governance principles, which reflect the Code and its principles-based approach

to corporate governance. Accordingly, the way in which CRH makes determinations of Directors’ independence differs from the NYSE rules. The Board has determined that, in its judgement, all of the non-executive Directors are independent. In doing so, however, the Board did not explicitly take into consideration the independence requirements outlined in the NYSE’s listing standards.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

The NYSE rules require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. CRH complies with Irish requirements, which are similar to the NYSE rules. The CRH Board, however, does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition on what are considered “material revisions”.

The following are available on the CRH website, www.crh.com:

Table 13

Corporate Governance section:

–      Terms of Reference ofAcquisitions Committee (amended December 2010)

–      Terms of Reference ofAudit Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofFinance Committee (amended February 2004)

–      Terms of Reference ofNomination & Corporate Governance Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofRemuneration Committee (amended December 2013)

–      The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company

–      Pre-approval policy for non-audit services provided by the auditors

–      Compliance & Ethics statement, Code of Business Conduct and Hotline contact numbers

–      The 2014 Remuneration Policy

Investors section:

–      Annual and Interim Reports, the Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interim Management Statements and copies of presentations to analysts and investors

–      News releases

–      Webcast recordings of key investor briefings

–      General Meeting dates, notices, shareholder circulars, presentations and poll results

–      Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, including questions regarding dividends and shareholder rights in respect of general meetings

LOGO

CRH        107


The Remuneration Committee consists of four non-executive Directors considered by the Board to be independent. They bring a range of experience of large organisations and public companies, including experience in the area of senior executive remuneration, to enable the Committee to fulfil its role. Their biographical details are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The main focus of the Committee is to:

–  determine and agree with the Board the Group’s policy on executive remuneration;

–  seek shareholder approval for the policy at least every three years;

–  ensure that CRH’s remuneration structures are fair and responsible; and

–  consider and approve remuneration packages for the executive Directors and the Chairman.

In addition, the Committee:

–  recommends and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for senior management; and

–  oversees the preparation of this Directors’ Remuneration Report.

In considering remuneration levels for executive Directors particularly, the Committee takes into account remuneration trends across the CRH Group, which has a diverse range of operations in 34 countries, in geographic regions which are often at different stages in the economic cycle.

Additional details in relation to the Committee, its role and responsibilities and how it operates are included in the Remuneration Committee section of the Corporate Governance report on page 104.

The Chief Executive attends meetings except when his own remuneration is being discussed.

Directors’ Remuneration Report

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

108        CRH


Introduction

LOGO

On behalf of theRemuneration Committee, I am pleased to introduce the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2014. The Remuneration Report (excluding the Remuneration Policy summary on pages 126 to 131), will be included on the agenda of the 2015 Annual General Meeting for shareholder consideration.

The purpose of CRH’s Remuneration Policy, which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, is to provide an appropriate framework to support the creation of value for shareholders over the longer term, the attraction and retention of key executives and succession planning, without paying more than is necessary. The full Remuneration Policy is available on the CRH website, www.crh.com.

2014 Performance

2014 was a year of growth and progress in terms of our aim of restoring margins and returns to peak levels in the coming years.

Recent Remuneration Snapshot:

•  Updated Remuneration Policy approved at 2014 AGM

•  New performance share plan adopted at 2014 AGM

•  Incentive payout levels linked to stretching performance criteria

•  Strong support from shareholders for policy and implementation

In addition, there was significant achievement regarding the Group’s multi-year divestment programme of €1.5 billion to €2.0 billion, with proceeds from disposals completed in 2014 of €0.35 billion since the programme was announced in August 2014.

Overall, CRH’s strong balance sheet and cash generation capability leave the Company well positioned to take advantage of value-creating acquisition opportunities.

In the context of the Group’s performance in 2014, and performance against individual and strategic goals, theRemuneration Committee has determined that the annual bonus levels for 2014 should be set at the maximum level of 150% for each of the executive Directors.

In accordance with CRH’s Remuneration Policy, approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, 25% of the 2014 bonus will be deferred into shares for a period of three years.

The basis for each bonus award is set out in detail on page 112. In line with evolving best practice, we have increased the level of disclosure in relation to payout levels to provide shareholders with a greater level of insight into the approach for determining bonus payments. We have also disclosed the targets for the bonus payments in respect of 2013 as these are no longer considered to be commercially sensitive. Similarly, theRemuneration Committee intends that the targets for the 2014 bonus plan will be disclosed in the 2015 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The 2014 Remuneration Policy also made provision for theRemuneration Committee to introduce clawback provisions, in addition to the malus2 provisions already in place for the annual bonus plan and the long-term performance share plan. The Committee has decided, in accordance with the provisions of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code, to introduce clawback provisions for the cash element of the annual bonus plan for 2015 and onwards.

The long-term awards made under the 2006 Performance Share Plan and the 2010 Share Option Scheme made in 2012 (each with a three year performance period 2012 - 2014) did not meet the relevant performance criteria required to vest and, consequently, those awards lapse in full. Further details are set out on pages 114 and 115.

Executive Director Salaries

As reported in the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report, following consideration of the scope of the Finance Director’s responsibilities and her performance since being appointed in 2010, the Committee decided that Maeve Carton’s salary should be increased, subject to continued

  Sales

+ 5% Return on Net Assets

      +150bps

  EBITDA (as defined)*

+11% Operating Cash  Flow

      +23%

  EPS

+33%1Net Debt

      -16%

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

CRH    55


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

EBITDA (as defined)* to Net Interest Ratio

Management believes that the EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio is useful to investors because it matches the earnings and cash generated by the business to the underlying funding costs. With strong operating cash flows and reducing debt balances, the ratio for 2010 increased to 6.5 times (2009: 6.1 times). The calculation of EBITDA (as defined)* to net interest ratio for the financial year is presented on page 4.

Effective Tax Rate

The effective tax rate in 2010 of 17.8% of pre-tax profit remained broadly consistent with 2009 (18.3%).

Shareholder Returns

The Company’s Ordinary Shares traded in the range11.51 to22.00 during 2010. The year-end share price was15.50, 18% lower than the 2009 closing price (19.01); with the 2010 dividend unchanged from 2009, the net return for shareholders in 2010 was a negative 16%. The 2010 reduction reflects volatile conditions in the broader market and follows returns of +22% in 2009, -22% in 2008, -23% in 2007 and +29% in 2006. CRH is one of six building materials companies included in the FTSEurofirst 300, a market capitalisation-weighted index of Europe’s largest 300 companies. At year-end 2010, CRH’s market capitalisation of11.0 billion was 17% lower than 2009 (13.3 billion). Based on market capitalisation CRH is among the top 5 building materials companies worldwide.

Debt to Equity

Total shareholders’ equity (capital and reserves attributable to CRH’s equity shareholders) increased by0.7 billion to10.4 billion during 2010, with the retained profits for the year of0.4 billion and currency translation effects of0.5 billion partly offset by dividends of0.4 billion; movements for the year are fully analysed in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. Year-end net debt of3.5 billion was0.25 billion lower (7%) than year-end 2009; this reduction in debt, combined with the increase in equity, resulted in a reduction in the percentage of net debt to total equity from 38% at year-end 2009 to 33% at year-end 2010.

The 7% decrease in net debt in 2010 was more than offset by the 17% reduction in market capitalisation resulting in an increase in the debt/market capitalisation percentage from 28% at year-end 2009 to 32% at year-end 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - 2010 compared with 2009

The comments below refer to the major components of the Group’s cash flows for 2010 and 2009 as shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on page 103.

Cash flows from operating activities

The198 million reduction in profit before tax is analysed in Table 1 on page 54. Depreciation and amortisation of917 million in 2010 includes impairment charges of102 million relating to subsidiaries and joint ventures (2009:41 million).

The Group continued to maintain an intense focus on cash generation throughout 2010 and the net working capital (including provisions) decrease (cash inflow) for the year represented a strong performance in a challenging environment. Due to the seasonal nature of CRH’s business, working capital movements exhibit a high degree of weather dependency and can significantly increase when measured during the peak season, generally May to September. The outflow as measured at 30 June 2010 amounted to542 million (30 June 2009 outflow:111 million), compared to an inflow of142 million at the year end (2009 inflow:740 million).

1Based on adjusted 2013 EPS (excluding impairments and the related tax impact).

 

*2DefinedMalus is a mechanism whereby the Remuneration Committee may decide not to release deferred share or performance share plan awards if an unusual event such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals anda material financial misstatement occurred, significant losses were incurred or the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.Company suffered significant reputational damage.
As disclosed in note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, net debt comprises interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents, liquid investments and derivative financial instruments.

 

56    CRHLOGO


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

Tax payments for 2010 at100 million were slightly less than 2009. Dividend payments increased by60 million in 2010, reflecting the full year impact of the additional shares in issue following the March 2009 Rights Issue.

Cash flows from investing and financing activities

Capital expenditure of466 million represented 2.7% of Group revenue (2009: 3.1%) and amounted to 59% of depreciation (including impairment of property, plant and equipment) of786 million (2009: 67%). Our 2010 capital expenditure included90 million of investment in major cement plants (2009:150 million).

Spend on acquisitions and investments in 2010 amounted to567 million, an increase of109 million compared with the458 million spent in 2009. This reflects the pick-up in development activity in the second half of 2010 during which the Group completed a total of 17 transactions, bringing total second-half spend, including deferred consideration from acquisitions in prior years, to408 million.

Proceeds from disposals increased from103 million in 2009 to188 million in 2010, reflecting actions taken by management across all segments to review the portfolio and generate cash from disposal of surplus assets.

The 2009 proceeds from the issue of shares figure of1.2 billion relate to net proceeds from the issue of 152 million new Ordinary Shares at8.40 per share under the terms of a 2 for 7 Rights Issue in March 2009.

Exchange rate movements during 2010 increased the euro amount of net foreign currency debt by221 million principally due to the 7% strengthening in the year-end exchange rate of the US Dollar versus the euro, from 1.4406 at end-2009 to 1.3362 at end-2010. This compares with an exchange gain (reduction in net debt) of120 million in 2009, when the year end US$/ exchange rate weakened and went from 1.3917 at end-2008 to 1.4406.

CRH    57


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

Segment Review

Europe Materials

2010 overview

                Analysis of change 
million 

% of

Group

  2010  2009  Change    Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  16%    2,665    2,749    -84     -228    +47    -    -    +97  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  26%    423    434    -11     -73    +4    +37    -    +21  

Operating profit

  36%    251    257    -6     -70    +2    +37    +9    +16  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      15.9%    15.8%            

Operating profit margin

      9.4%    9.3%            

Like-for-like sales declined by 8% in 2010, with construction activity in our main European markets hampered by very severe weather at both the beginning and end of the year. The impact of cost reductions, together with the benefits from trading of CO2 allowances (67 million compared with22 million in 2009) helped contain the EBITDA (as defined)* decline to 3% in a generally more competitive pricing environment.

2010 saw a pick-up in acquisition activity with123 million spent on a total of 8 transactions, of which the most significant was the expansion of the Division’s aggregates and readymixed concrete business in Switzerland; we continued to invest in our associate Yatai Building Materials as it expanded its presence in northeastern China.

Europe Materials’ operations fall into three main categories: economies in the west and southwest of Europe experiencing severe fiscal imbalances and growing public debt levels; generally stable economies in mainland Europe; and developing economies in Eastern Europe and Asia.

Ireland, Portugal, Spain

In Ireland, activity again fell steeply during 2010 and cement volumes were 23% lower than 2009. Additional cost-reduction programmes were implemented to reduce capacity; after charging lower restructuring and impairment costs, operating losses reduced. In Portugal, the construction sector contracted by almost 8% in 2010 with the residential sector registering the largest decline. Our 49% joint venture was adversely impacted by reduced domestic demand for both cement and downstream products, but maintained its high level of exports at stable prices; although activities outside Portugal benefited from good demand, overall operating profit was down on 2009. In Spain, construction activity declined by a further 16% in 2010. Lower demand from the residential and non-residential sectors was only partly offset by increased public infrastructure spend and the impact of significant cost savings, and operating profit fell sharply.

Switzerland, Finland, Benelux

Construction activity in Switzerland rose by 3% in 2010, and volumes in both our cement and aggregates operations were well ahead of last year. Although cement prices were lower than 2009, higher volumes, and further cost reductions in our downstream business, resulted in higher operating profit. In Finland, construction output grew by over 4%, led by a strong rebound in new residential activity. Infrastructure volumes remained stable at strong levels, while non-residential construction continued to decline. A 19% improvement in cement volumes, combined with the benefit of greater use of alternative fuels and other cost reduction initiatives, led to an increase in operating profit. In the Benelux, despite efficiency improvements at our cement trading, readymixed concrete and aggregates business, lower aggregates volumes resulted in a fall in operating profit compared with 2009.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

58    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

Central and Eastern Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Asia

In Poland, construction activity was impacted by very severe weather in the first quarter and again in December, and grew only modestly. Cement volumes were slightly ahead of 2009 and volumes of other products stabilised or improved. Although some price improvement was achieved in the more buoyant second half, margins were under pressure from stiff competition and operating profit was lower than 2009. In Ukraine, severe winter conditions resulted in sharply lower first-quarter volumes, but a pick-up in demand in later months saw full-year cement volumes only 10% behind 2009 levels. Unrecovered cost increases, particularly fuel, were only partly offset by the impact of further cost savings, and operating profit was lower. In Turkey, domestic cement demand in the Aegean region and export levels remained steady. Selling prices and operating profit for our 50% joint venture were higher than 2009.

In southern India, market conditions weakened across our 50% cement joint venture’s core markets, as newly-commissioned cement capacity put pressure on volumes and prices resulting in lower operating profit than in 2009. In China, further growth in the construction sector, driven primarily by improved residential activity and a continued roll-out of major infrastructure projects, saw cement demand grow by over 10% in the northeastern region, where our wholly-owned and 26% associate operations are located. In this environment volumes, selling prices and profitability increased in line with expectations.

Americas Materials

2010 overview

                Analysis of change 
million 

% of

Group

  2010  2009  Change    Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  26%    4,417    4,280    +137     -302    +215    -    -    +224  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  35%    566    670    -104     -183    +32    +11    -    +36  

Operating profit

  41%    288    407    -119     -174    +22    +11    -    +22  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      12.8%    15.7%            

Operating profit margin

      6.5%    9.5%            

Americas Materials faced a challenging environment in 2010 with continued volume declines in all product lines, higher energy costs and severe pricing pressure. Market declines were most severe in the Southeast, Mountain West and Northwest, which together contributed over two-thirds of the operating profit shortfall compared with 2009. Aggressive actions to reduce fixed and variable cost helped to mitigate the impact of volume and margin declines; however, overall US Dollar EBITDA (as defined)* was 20% lower than 2009 with operating profit down over 33%.

The Division completed 18 acquisitions in 2010 with a total spend of249 million, adding 34 quarries (579 million tonnes of reserves), 14 asphalt plants and 25 readymixed concrete plants with annual production of 8 million tonnes of aggregates, 1 million tonnes of asphalt and 0.5 million cubic metres of readymixed concrete. We also broke ground on a new granite quarry in Camak, Georgia, which is expected to be open in early 2012 and will supply our coastal Georgia and Florida asphalt business with stone, leveraging our extensive rail distribution network in the region.

Volumes / Prices

Like-for-like sales for Americas Materials were 7% lower than 2009. Residential construction declined only slightly (1%) from low levels, while non-residential construction declined by 14%. States and municipalities reduced highway spending due to significant budgetary pressures and this more than offset the benefits of the federal stimulus bill (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, ‘ARRA’). On a like-for-like basis, volumes were down 4% in aggregates, 5% in asphalt and 8% in readymixed concrete, while construction

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

CRH    59


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

revenues fell by 10%. With the benefit of acquisitions, volumes were up 1% in aggregates and asphalt, and up 5% in readymixed concrete, while construction revenues fell by 5%. By continuing to deliver superior quality and service, Americas Materials was able to raise aggregates and asphalt prices by 1%, while limiting price declines for readymixed concrete to 5% in a very competitive environment. Despite lower volumes and higher energy costs, the business continued to improve efficiency and reduce input costs resulting in flat unit production costs for aggregates and readymixed concrete. While asphalt throughput costs also were reduced and we used 7% more recycled asphalt per tonne of mix than in 2009, increases in bitumen prices resulted in higher unit costs and lower margins. Margins on contract paving services dropped sharply due to severe competition for infrastructure projects.

Energy and Other Costs

The price of bitumen, a key component of asphalt mix, increased 14% over 2009. Diesel and gasoline prices, important inputs to aggregates, readymixed concrete and paving operations, increased by 10% and 7% respectively. Our teams leveraged operational best practices to increase efficiency, reduce costs, increase the use of recycled materials, and raise quality and service levels to customers while maintaining price discipline. These actions, combined with the elimination of over40 million fixed overhead costs through restructuring and other management action during 2010, partially offset the negative impact of lower volumes, higher energy costs and more competitive markets.

Regional Performance

Americas Materials’ operations are geographically organised, segmented into East and West. The East contains four divisions and the West, which given the severe market declines during 2010, has been consolidated from four divisions to three in order to reduce costs and optimise performance.

East

Overall operating profit was lower than 2009 despite a strong performance in our Mid-Atlantic and Central divisions, both of which delivered improved operating profit over a strong 2009. Operating profit in our Northeast division was lower than in 2009 and was down sharply in our Southeast division which continues to be impacted by very weak residential markets.

West

Operating profit in our Central West division was lower than in 2009. Operating profit declines were more marked in the Mountain West division and Northwest division, both of which experienced a steep decline due to less public and private work than in 2009.

Europe Products

2010 overview

                Analysis of change 
million % of
Group
  2010  2009  Change    Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  16%    2,817    3,002    -185     -213    -    -    -    +28  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  12%    198    283    -85     -109    -    +25    -    -1  

Operating profit

  2%    11    116    -105     -93    -    +25    -35    -2  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      7.0%    9.4%            

Operating profit margin

      0.4%    3.9%            

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Trading conditions for our products businesses in Europe remained difficult in 2010. The first quarter was heavily impacted by a prolonged winter which negatively influenced volumes. The rest of the year showed a

60    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

moderation in the rate of decline versus 2009 resulting in overall like-for-like sales down 7% for the year. Significant price pressure in many markets adversely impacted our margins and, despite strong cost control EBITDA (as defined)* declined by 30% compared with 2009.

Concrete Products

Activity was severely affected by the adverse early weather conditions and weaker residential and non-residential construction demand. Our Architectural operations (pavers, tiles and blocks) faced difficult conditions with our Dutch, Danish, German and Slovakian paver businesses suffering from weaker markets and increased price pressure. In contrast, results in our French and Belgian operations improved slightly, driven by targeted commercial initiatives and good cost-control. Further factory closures were made in the Netherlands and France and overall operating costs were reduced significantly. Operating profit in architectural concrete was below 2009.

Our Structural operations (floor and wall elements, beams and vaults) reported operating profit well below 2009. These businesses were severely impacted by difficult conditions in both new residential and new non-residential markets, and experienced increased price pressure due to significant overcapacity in all countries, although our Belgian specialty business which supplies the industrial and farming sector continued to deliver strong results. The ongoing major programme of restructuring initiatives continued in 2010 with production shutdowns and impairment charges.

Clay Products

In the UK, demand improved quickly after poor weather early in the year as house builders reopened sites. However, industry brick volumes levelled out as the year progressed, with overall growth for the year estimated at approximately 7%. With the benefit of recent years’ major reorganisation and cost cutting initiatives, operating profit improved with the uplift in volumes. In the Netherlands, brick markets were very challenging, though paver markets remained more stable. Capacity rationalisation and reduced costs supported an increase in operating profit. In Poland all product markets remained difficult and operating profit declined compared with 2009.

Building Products

Despite declining volumes, our leading market positions and effective cost-reduction action resulted in an increase in operating profit. Our Construction Accessories business, the market leader in Western Europe, was impacted by falling non-residential demand. This was in part offset by the introduction of innovative products, rigorous cost-control, production efficiencies and good commercial practices, resulting in higher operating profit compared with 2009. Our Outdoor Security Products operations, specialising in entrance control solutions, are mainly active in non-residential construction with a focus on the growing RMI and safety and comfort markets. Volumes in Fencing, Security and Access Systems were lower than in 2009, but operating profit was higher. Our Roller Shutters business delivered a good performance with sales and operating profit substantially exceeding 2009.

Following rigorous strategic analysis, we decided at the end of 2009 to exit the Insulation and Climate Control sectors as we no longer saw a route to becoming a pan-European leader in these segments. In November 2010 we reached agreement to sell the majority of our Insulation business.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

CRH    61


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

Americas Products

2010 overview

                Analysis of change 
million 

% of

Group

  2010  2009  Change   Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  14%    2,469    2,536    -67     -230    +2    -    -    +161  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  10%    154    173    -19     -51    -    +18    -    +14  

Operating profit

  -3%    -24    23    -47     -42    -1    +18    -27    +5  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      6.2%    6.8%            

Operating profit margin

      -1.0%    0.9%            

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Americas Products experienced significant demand pressures, with further declines in all of our markets, in particular the non-residential sector, as the year progressed. This was most evident in our BuildingEnvelope™ and late-cycle concrete product segments. Like-for-like sales were down 9% compared with 2009. The adverse impact of the volume declines, together with the impairment charge (mainly relating to Ivy Steel), were only partly offset by ongoing cost restructuring initiatives and the non-recurrence of inventory write-downs recorded by MMI in 2009, resulting in an operating loss of24 million for 2010 (2009: profit of23 million).

Our Architectural Products business unit completed two bolt-on transactions during 2010. The acquisition of a leading supplier of soils, mulches and decorative stone in September expanded the footprint of our lawn and garden business providing a strong plant network to service retailers in the central and upper Midwest. In the same month, our existing masonry business in Illinois and Wisconsin was strengthened with the purchase of a block manufacturer in the Chicago metropolitan area.

Building Products

With effect from January 2011, the Architectural, Precast, and MMI groups were combined to form a new product group - Building Products. The new organisational alignment will accelerate the capture of market growth opportunities while streamlining common business processes and functions.

Architectural Products (APG) faced difficult trading conditions in 2010 due to continued weakness in the residential construction sector and further declines in non-residential markets. The overall challenging market environment was somewhat offset by solid growth in Canada and relative stability in both the DIY and professional RMI segments. The cost reduction measures implemented since 2008 have sharply reduced the cost structure and rationalised the capacity of APG, resulting in margin stability in 2010 while setting the stage for strong profit improvement once volumes begin to recover. Overall, APG recorded a similar level of US Dollar operating profit to 2009, on a 7% decline in like-for-like sales.

In our Precast group, weak residential activity in 2010 again negatively affected demand for precast products throughout the US. This impact was compounded by further declines in the commercial sector, particularly in the eastern US. Overall, full-year volumes fell by 5% compared with 2009. A generally more competitive pricing environment eroded some of the improvements in contribution margin that had been generated in 2009. Reduced overhead levels somewhat mitigated the impact, but overall operating profit was lower.

MMI continued to be impacted by the deepening decline in non-residential construction activity which led to a further decrease in sales; the favourable impact in 2010 of the absence of 2009’s significant inventory write-down was more than offset by the impairment charge recorded as a result of the divestment in November of the Ivy Steel welded wire reinforcement business.

62    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

BuildingEnvelope™

Sales continued to be weak due to sharp declines in commercial activity. Order and quoting volumes remained slow and building delays and cancellations continued to be a challenge. In this environment we focussed on maintaining market share, tightening cost control, improving our processes and ensuring customer satisfaction, while maintaining our ongoing emphasis on quality. Pricing continued to be intensely competitive and sales and operating profit sharply declined for the year.

South America

Our South American operations benefited from better economic conditions in 2010 in Chile and Argentina. While performance improved in our Argentine ceramic tile and glass businesses, margins declined in an inflationary cost environment in the second half of the year. Our Chilean glass business performed well in a buoyant construction market. The Santiago-based distribution business also recovered from a challenging year in 2009, and operating profit improved. Overall, sales and operating profit in our South American operations advanced strongly for the year.

Europe Distribution

2010 overview

  

% of

             Analysis of change 
million Group  2010  2009  Change   Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  21%    3,566    3,633    -67     -204    +37    -    -    +100  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  13%    214    204    +10     -11    +4    +11    -    +6  

Operating profit

  19%    135    137    -2     -12    +3    +11    -8    +4  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      6.0%    5.6%            

Operating profit margin

      3.8%    3.8%            

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Trading conditions for the Distribution businesses continued to be difficult in 2010 with the residential sectors across most of our markets showing varying degrees of decline. Ongoing focus on price management and procurement optimisation resulted in stable gross margins versus 2009. Operating profit was maintained in line with 2009 with the benefit of acquisition contributions, further cost-reduction measures, improved category management and the operational excellence programmes that we have put in place in recent years.

In August, Europe Distribution acquired 75% of Sax Sanitair, a leading merchant in SHAP materials based in western Belgium. With nine branches across the east and west Flanders region, the acquisition is a further step in our strategy to build a European platform in the growing repair, maintenance and improvement focussed SHAP market. In December, we acquired a further 50% stake in the German-based Bauking distribution business raising our ownership from 48% to 98%. With 128 branches and annual sales of750 million, the business has grown both organically and through acquisition since our initial investment in 2005 and is a leading player in the German distribution market. This acquisition greatly strengthens our existing distribution position in Europe’s largest construction market. During 2010 we sold our activities in the kitchen business in the German speaking part of Switzerland and our ironmongery distribution activities in the Netherlands.

Professional Builders Merchants

With 501 locations in six countries, Professional Builders Merchants has strong market positions in all its regions. Benelux: Markets remained weak in 2010, resulting in a further sales decline. Operating profit was also lower but declined at a relatively slower pace than sales due to strict cost control and margin management. France: Sales stabilised at last year’s level. Due to the restructuring actions that started in late 2009 we saw an improvement of our profitability. Switzerland: 2010 proved to be another stable year

CRH    63


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

for Swiss market sales, with operating profit ahead of 2009 due to strong margin management and a better product mix. Austria: The turnaround in performance of this business which commenced in 2008 continued in 2010 resulting in a further increase in operating profit and margins. Germany: Builders Merchants sales in Germany were comparable to 2009 and particularly strong in the second half of 2010. Operating profit improved significantly, reflecting higher margins and successful cost control. Overall operating profit for Builders Merchants was ahead of 2009.

Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing

Our SHAP business in Germany and Switzerland again proved to be a stable performer in 2010 with robust sales and improved operating profit performance. Our 2010 acquisition in Belgium has performed strongly and has exceeded expectations.

DIY

Our DIY platform in Europe operates a network of 243 stores under four different brands. The Netherlands: Weakening consumer confidence, which became evident in the fourth quarter of 2009, began to impact the DIY businesses more severely in 2010. Despite further focus on efficient store operations and tight cost-control which enabled us to maintain gross margins, we were not able to fully compensate for the lagging sales performance. Belgium: Our network of 19 stores reported lower sales and operating profit due to weaker consumer confidence and demand. Germany: With increasing consumer confidence and continued strong focus on costs, operating profit for Bauking’s 51-store DIY network improved to a more satisfactory level. Portugal: The economic environment continued to be difficult and sales remained under pressure. Due to restructuring measures, operating profit was slightly better than in 2009. Spain: Market circumstances for our Spanish DIY operation in the Alicante/Valencia region remained very challenging throughout 2010 and we decided to exit this business which resulted in rationalisation and impairment charges. Overall DIY operating profit was well below 2009.

Americas Distribution

2010 overview

  % of             Analysis of change 
million Group  2010  2009  Change   Organic  Acquisitions  Restructuring  Impairment  Exchange 

Sales revenue

  7%    1,239    1,173    +66     +2    +3    -    -    +61  

EBITDA (as defined)*

  4%    60    39    +21     +16    -    +3    -    +2  

Operating profit

  5%    37    15    +22     +18    -    +3    -    +1  

EBITDA (as defined)* margin

      4.8%    3.3%            

Operating profit margin

      3.0%    1.3%            

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

Americas Distribution, trading as Allied Building Products (Allied), experienced another challenging year in 2010. Activity levels in both segments of our business were impacted, but with the benefit of lower operating costs and stable gross margins, operating profit improved significantly from 2009.

Since 2008, Allied has closed or merged 27 locations, many in smaller markets, and added 3 locations. This process has provided an opportunity to evaluate Allied’s market footprint and to position the business for future opportunities. In addition, the business has concentrated on purchasing and transportation initiatives, rationalisation of administrative and geographic oversight functions, thereby increasing efficiency, control and profitability. This aggressive operating approach has substantially benefited 2010 operating results.

Due to the continued downturn in the macroeconomic environment, Allied curtailed capital spending and kept development activity to a minimum; during 2010 we acquired one Exterior Products distributor in Sacramento, California.

64    CRH


Business Review

BUSINESS REVIEW -Prior Year

In order to further penetrate the competitive marketplace, Allied launched a new product initiative in 2010. “TriBuilt Materials” was established to provide a proprietary private label brand of products sold exclusively through Allied’s network of Exterior and Interior branches. This product initiative differentiates Allied in the market while building an exclusive brand identity. TriBuilt® enables Allied to vertically integrate many of its higher-margin items, simultaneously enhancing profit margins and purchasing efficiencies. As brand awareness expands within the contractor community, Allied will add more products to this profitable operating segment.

Exterior Products

Allied is one of the top three distributors in this segment in the United States. Demand is influenced by residential and commercial replacement activity (75% of sales volume is RMI-related) with key products having an average life span of 25 years. Markets continue to be challenged as US shipments of asphalt roofing shingles declined further, down 8.5% on 2009, impacted by the historically low level of new housing starts. Despite this, solid performance from the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Upper Midwest and Colorado regions has enabled the Exterior Products division to experience sales growth and a good advance in operating profit for the year.

Interior Products

This business area has low exposure to weather-driven replacement activity and is heavily dependent on the new commercial construction market. Allied is the third largest Interior Products distributor in the US. The new construction market continued to decline as shipments of wallboard, one barometer of market activity, declined 9% in Allied’s market areas. Despite a 12% decline in sales, operating performance stabilised due to a strong presence in Hawaii, the benefit of lower operating costs and the consolidation of smaller and underperforming locations.

CRH    65


DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

CRH      109


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

individual and business performance, to €675,000 in two steps. Her salary increased to €625,000 (+9.7%) in 2014. TheRemuneration Committee has determined that it is appropriate to make the second increase (to €675,000) in respect of 2015 (+8%).

The Committee has also reviewed the salary levels for Albert Manifold and Mark Towe and determined that increases of 7.5% to €1,290,000 and 3% to US$1,420,000 respectively are appropriate. The increase for Albert Manifold reflects the speed with which he has developed in the Chief Executive role, demonstrated by the progress in the delivery of strategy and the improvement in returns and margins referred to above. TheRemuneration Committee also noted that the salary of Albert Manifold remains below the level of €1,450,000 awarded to the Chief Executive of CRH in 2008. The increase for Mark Towe is in line with increases across the general employee population in the United States.

2015 Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan

Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan in 2015 will be made at the same level as in 2014 and will continue to be based on TSR and adjusted cash flow. The adjusted cash flow targets have not yet been set by theRemuneration Committee and will be set when the outcome of the proposed acquisition of assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd is known. As in previous years, the targets will be demanding and aligned to value creation for shareholders, with significant stretch ensuring that only exceptional performance will result in maximum payout.

Remuneration Policy

As referred to in the Chairman’s introduction to the Annual Report on page 2, CRH has entered into a binding commitment to acquire certain assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd for a total enterprise value of €6.5 billion. In the context of this proposed acquisition, the Committee will review the remuneration policy during the

course of 2015 to ensure it remains appropriate for the needs of the business.

Conclusion

Shareholders play a crucial role in the design of appropriate, balanced and fair remuneration structures and, as I will retire from the Board of CRH following the 2015 Annual General Meeting, I would like to thank all those who have engaged with CRH during my tenure asRemuneration Committee Chairman, for their constructive approach to dialogue with the Company. I have no doubt that my successor, Don McGovern, will benefit from your continued strong support for CRH.

Dan O’Connor

Remuneration Committee Chairman


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

 

66    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Board of Directors

LOGO

CRH    67


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Board of Directors

Board of DirectorsAnnual Statement on Remuneration

The Boardfollowing section sets out details of:

the remuneration paid to Directors in respect of 2014;

how CRH’s remuneration policy will operate for 2015; and

other areas of disclosure.

The Directors’ Remuneration Report, excluding the Remuneration Policy summary on pages 126 to 131, will be

put to shareholders for the purposes of Directors managean advisory vote at the businessAnnual General Meeting to be held on 7 May 2015.

The Company is not seeking shareholder approval for a revised Remuneration Policy this year and, therefore, we have not included the full policy in this report. We have, however, included the executive Director and non-executive Director policy tables, as well as details of the Company. The Directors, other than the non-executive Directors, serveChief Executive’s service contract as executive officers of the Company.information for shareholders.

 

Executive Directors

M. Lee BE, FCAAcquisitions Committee

Chief ExecutiveAcquisitions Committee Members

(Aged 58)

A. Manifold FCPA, MBA, MBS

Chief Operating Officer

(Aged 49)

M. Carton MA, FCA

Finance Director

(Aged 53)

M.S. Towe

Chief Executive Officer

Oldcastle, Inc.

(Aged 62)

BiographiesThe biographies of the Executive Directorsmembers of theAcquisitions Committee are shownset out on pages 14 and 15.

Non-executive Directors

E.J. Bärtschi LIC.OEC.HSG

Ernst Bärtschi became a non-executive Director in October 2011. A Swiss national, he was until 31 December 2011 Chief Executive of Sika AG, a manufacturer of speciality chemicals for construction and general industry. Prior87 to joining Sika, he worked for the Schindler Group and was Chief Finance Officer between 1997 and 2001. Over the course of his career he has gained extensive experience in India, China and the Far East generally. He is a member of the board of Bucher Industries AG, a mechanical and vehicle engineering company based in Switzerland. (Aged 59).

W.P. Egan

Bill Egan became a non-executive Director in January 2007. A United States citizen, he is founder and General Partner of Alta Communications and Marion Equity Partners LLC, Massachusetts-based venture capital firms. He is89.

a directorThe tenure of the Irish venture capital company Delta Partners Limited. He also serves on the boards of several communications, cable and information technology companies. Heeach Committee member is past Chairman of Cephalon Inc., and past President and Chairman of the National Venture Capital Association. (Aged 66).

U-H. Felcht

Utz-Hellmuth Felcht became a non-executive Director in July 2007. A German national, he was, until May 2006, Chief Executive of Degussa AG, Germany’s third largest chemical company. He is a partner in the private equity group One Equity Partners Europe GmbH, Chairman of the German rail company Deutsche Bahn AG, and a member of the Supervisory Board of Jungbunzlauer Holding AG. He was until May 2011 Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Süd-Chemie Aktiengesellschaft. (Aged 64).

N. Hartery BE, CEng, FIEI, MBA

Chairman Designate

Nicky Hartery became a non-executive Director in June 2004 and was appointed Chairman Designate in February 2012. He was Vice President of Manufacturing and Business Operations for Dell Inc.’s Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) operations from 2000 to 2008. Prior to joining Dell, he was Executive Vice President at Eastman Kodak and previously held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer at Verbatim Corporation, based in the United States. He is Chief Executive of Prodigium, a consulting company which provides business advisory services. He is also a non-executive director of Musgrave Group plc, a privately owned international food retailer, and Eircom Limited, a company which provides telecommunications services in Ireland. (Aged 60).

J.M. de Jong

Jan Maarten de Jong became a non-executive Director in January 2004. A Dutch national, he is a member of the Supervisory Board of Heineken N.V. He is a former member of the Managing

68    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Board of Directorsas follows:

 

 

Board of ABN Amro Bank N.V. and continued to be a Special Advisor to the board of that company until April 2006. He is also a director of a number of European banking, insurance and industrial holding companies, including AON Groep Nederland B.V. and KBC Bank N.V. (Aged 66).

J.W. Kennedy MSc, BE, CEng, FIEE

John Kennedy became a non-executive Director in June 2009. He is past Chairman of Wellstream Holdings plc. In a 40 year career, he has served as Executive Vice President of Halliburton Company, President of Dresser Enterprises and Chief Operations Officer of Brown and Root Services. He is a director of Integra Group and is non-executive Chairman of Maxwell Drummond International Limited, Hydrasun Holdings Limited, Welltec A/S and BiFold Group Limited. He is also a past director of the UK Atomic Energy Authority. (Aged 61).

K. McGowan

Chairman

Kieran McGowan became Chairman of CRH in 2007 having been a non-executive Director since 1998. He is a director of Elan Corporation plc and Charles Schwab Worldwide Funds plc and is Chairman of Property Industry Ireland (PII) Limited and Business in the Community Ireland. He was Chief Executive of IDA Ireland (Ireland’s inward investment promotion agency) from 1990 to 1998 and has served as President of the Irish Management Institute and as Chairman of the Governing Authority of University College Dublin. (Aged 68).

H.A. McSharry BComm, MBS

Heather Ann McSharry became a non-executive Director in February 2012. She is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Bank of Ireland Pension Fund and is a director of Ergonomics Solutions International, IDA Ireland and the Institute of Directors. She is a former Managing Director of Reckitt Benckiser and Boots Healthcare in Ireland and was previously a director of Bank of Ireland and Enterprise Ireland. (Aged 50).

D.N. O’Connor BComm, FCA

Dan O’Connor became a non-executive Director in June 2006. He is a former President and Chief

Executive Officer of GE Consumer Finance - Europe and a former Senior Vice-President of GE. He was until October 2010 Executive Chairman of Allied Irish Banks, plc. (Aged 52).

Changes in Directors

Ms. J.M.C. O’Connor retired from the Board on 4 May 2011. Mr. W.I. O’Mahony retired from the Board on 31 December 2011.

Mr. E. Bärtschi was appointed to the Board on 26 October 2011. Ms. H.A. McSharry was appointed to the Board on 22 February 2012.

Mr. K. McGowan will retire from the Board at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held on 9 May 2012.

Under the Company’s Articles of Association, co-opted Directors are required to submit themselves to shareholders for election at the Annual General Meeting following their appointment and all the Directors are required to submit themselves for re-election at intervals of not more than three years. However, in accordance with the provisions contained in the 2010 UK Corporate Governance Code, the Board has decided that all Directors eligible for re-election should retire at each Annual General Meeting and offer themselves for re-election, where applicable.

CRH    69


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Board of Directors

Board Committees

 

Acquisitions

N. Hartery
  Length of service on Committee**2.5 years

K. McGowan,Chairman

M. Carton
  114.5 years

M. Carton

U-H. Felcht
  1.53.0 years

U-H. Felcht

J.W. Kennedy
  Newly appointed0.5 years

M. Lee

A. Manifold
  86.0 years

A. Manifold

3 years

D.N. O’Connor

5 years

Audit

J.M. de Jong,Chairman*

8 years

E.J. Bärtschi

Newly appointed

H.A. McSharry

Newly appointed

D.N. O’Connor*

5.5 years

Finance

K. McGowan,Chairman

4.5 years

M. Carton

1.5 years

U-H. Felcht

4.5 years

M. Lee

8 years

Nomination & Corporate Governance

K. McGowan,Chairman

4.5 years

W.P. Egan

4.5 years

N. Hartery

7.5 years

J.W. Kennedy

2.5 years

Remuneration

N. Hartery,Chairman

7.5 years

W.P. Egan

4.5 years

J.W. Kennedy

2.5 years

Senior Independent Director

N. Hartery

 

 

*Audit Committee Financial Expert

**From date of appointment to 31 December 2011

Mr. P. Kennedy and Mr. H. Rottinghuis were appointed to the Committee on 25 February 2015.

70    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

The attendance atAcquisitions Committeemeetings is set out in table 11 below.

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate GovernanceRole and Responsibilities

TheAcquisitions Committee has been delegated authority by the Board to approve acquisitions and disposals and large capital expenditure projects up to agreed limits.

Finance Committee

Finance Committee Members

The biographies of the members of theFinance Committeeare set out on pages 87 to 89.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

 

 

 

N. Hartery2.5 years
M. Carton4.5 years
U-H. Felcht7.5 years
J.W. Kennedy0.5 years

Corporate Governance Report

CRH, which

Mr. E.J. Bärtschi and Ms. H.A. McSharry were appointed to the Committee on 25 February 2015.

The attendance atFinance Committeemeetings is incorporated in Ireland and subject to Irish Company Law, has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, a secondary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange and its American Depositary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled; it is concerned with the way in which a board operates and sets the values for a company, rather than with the day-to-day operational management of a company by full-time executives. The Directors and management of CRH are committed to maintaining very high standards of corporate governance and ethical business conduct, and this Report describes CRH’s governance principles and practice and the Group’s risk management and internal control systems. The Report also sets out how CRH applies the main and supporting principles of the 2010 UK Corporate Governance Code (the 2010 Code) which, with effect from 1 January 2011 for CRH, replaced the June 2008 Combined Code on Corporate Governance. This Report also takes into account the disclosure requirements set out in the corporate governance annex to the listing rules of the Irish Stock Exchange.table 11 below.

A copy of the 2010 Code can be obtained from the Financial Reporting Council’s website,www.frc.org.uk.

Board of Directors

Role of the Boardand Responsibilities

The BoardFinance Committee is collectively responsible for the leadership, control, developmentfor:

advising the Board on the financial requirements of the Group and on

 

 

Attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings during the year ended 31 December 2014

 

  

 

 

 

 

Table 11

 

 

  

 

     

 

Board

 

  Acquisitions  Audit  Finance  Nomination  Remuneration 
   No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  
   Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total   Attended  
 

E.J. Bärtschi

  8  8        10  10                    
 

M. Carton

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

W.P. Egan

  8  7                    7  7  8   8  
 

U-H. Felcht

  8  7  8  8        7  7              
 

N. Hartery

  8  8  8  8        7  7  7  7  8   8  
 

J.M. de Jong*

  2  2  1  1        2  2              
 

J.W. Kennedy

  8  8  2  2              5  5  7   7  
 

D.A. McGovern, Jr.  

  8  8        10  10                    
 

H.A. McSharry

  8  8        10  10                    
 

A. Manifold

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

D.N. O’Connor

  8  8        5  5        7  7  8   8  
 

H. Th. Rottinghuis**

  8  8        5  4                    
 

M.S. Towe

  8  8                                
 *   Retired May 2014        
 ** Appointed to Board February 2014        
 

Note: See summary of Board Committee changes in table 10 on page 103.

 

        

104      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

appropriate funding arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to the issue and buy-back of shares and debt instruments and on the Group’s financing arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to dividend levels on the Ordinary Shares;

keeping the Board advised of the financial implications of Board decisions in relation to acquisitions;

assisting management, at their request, in considering any financial or taxation aspect of the Group’s affairs; and

reviewing the Group’s insurance arrangements.

Risk Management and long-term success of the Group. We are also responsible for instilling the appropriate culture, values and behaviour throughout the organisation. There is a formal schedule of matters reserved to the Board for consideration and decision. This includes Board appointments, approval of the Annual Report, the Interim Results and the annual budget, major acquisitions, significant capital expenditure and approval of strategic plans for the Group. The Group’s strategy, which is regularly reviewed by the Board, and its business model are summarised on page 10.Internal Control

The Board has delegated responsibility for the managementmonitoring of the Group, through the Chief Executive, to executive management. It has been our practice since the formation of the Group in the 1970s that the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are not combined. There is a clear division of responsibilities, which is set out in writing and has been approved by the Board, between the two roles. The Chief Executive has full day-to-day operational and profit responsibility for the Group and is accountable to the Board for all authority delegated to executive management. His overall brief is to execute agreed strategy, to co-ordinate and oversee the profitable growth of a diverse group of international businesses and to maximise the contribution of senior management to business planning, operational control and profit performance.

Non-executive Directors are expected to constructively challenge management proposals and to examine and review management performance in meeting agreed objectives and targets. In addition, they are expected to draw on their experience and knowledge in respect of any challenges facing the Group and in relation to the development of proposals on strategy.

The Board has delegated some of its responsibilities to Committees of the Board. The work of each Committee is set out on pages 75 to 80 of this Report. While responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to theAudit Committee1. Such systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and, in the case of internal control systems, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared subject to oversight and control of the Finance Director, ensuring correct data is captured from Group locations and all required information for disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements is provided. An appropriate control framework has been delegatedput in place around the recording of appropriate eliminating journals and other adjustments. The Consolidated Financial Statements are reviewed by the CRH Financial Reporting and Disclosure Group prior to being reviewed by theAudit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Directors confirm that the Group’s ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing its principal risks and uncertainties (as outlined on pages 52 to 63) is in accordance with the updated Turnbull guidance(Internal Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code) published in October 2005. The process has been in place throughout the accounting period and up to the Audit Committee1,date of approval of the Annual Report and financial statements.

Group management has responsibility for major strategic development and financing decisions. Responsibility for operational issues is devolved, subject to limits of authority, to product group and operating company management. Management at all levels is responsible for internal control over the business functions that have been delegated. This embedding of the system of internal control throughout the Group’s operations ensures that the organisation is capable of responding quickly to evolving business risks, and that significant internal control issues,

should they arise, are reported promptly to appropriate levels of management.

During the year, the Board retains ultimate responsibility for determiningandAuditCommitteereceived, on a regular basis, reports from management on the key risks to the business and the steps being taken to manage such risks. They also considered whether the significant risks faced by the Group were being identified, evaluated and appropriately managed, having regard to the balance of risk, cost and opportunity. In addition, theAudit Committee met with internal auditors on a regular basis and satisfied itself as to the adequacy of the Group’s “risk appetite”internal control system; met with the Chairman of theRemuneration Committee to ensure that the Group’s remuneration policies and annually considers a reportstructures were appropriate and in relationline with the Group’s risk tolerance; and reviewed the principal risks and uncertainties outlined on pages 52 to 63. TheAudit Committee also met with, and received reports from, the external auditors. The Chairman of theAudit Committee reported regularly to the Board on all significant issues considered by the Committee and the minutes of its meetings were circulated to all Directors.

The Directors confirm that, in addition to the monitoring controlling and reportingcarried out by theAudit Committee under its Terms of identified risks and uncertainties. In addition,Reference, they have reviewed the Board receives regular reports from the Chairmaneffectiveness of the Audit Committee in relationGroup’s risk management and internal control systems up to and including the workdate of that Committee in the area of risk management.

Individual Directors may seek independent professional advice, at the expenseapproval of the Company,financial statements. This had regard to all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls that could affect the Group’s business.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In accordance with the requirements of Rule 13a-15 of the US Securities Exchange Act, the following report is provided by management in respect of the furtheranceCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, their duties as a Director.

The Group has a Directors’the Company’s principal executive and Officers’ liability insurance policyprincipal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in place.accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

1InPertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Section 91(6)(b)generally accepted accounting principles,

and that receipts and expenditures of the EC (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.Company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the US Securities Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our Company’s published Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes under generally accepted accounting principles.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission.

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company has elected to exclude an assessment of the internal controls of acquisitions made during the year 2014. These acquisitions, which are listed in note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, constituted 0.7% of total assets and 1.2% of net assets, as of 31 December 2014 and 0.6% and 0.8% of revenue and Group profit for the financial year, respectively, for the year then ended.

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this assessment, management has concluded and hereby reports that as of 31 December 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our auditors, Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, who have audited the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014, have audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Their report, on which an unqualified opinion is expressed thereon, is included on page 134.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During 2014, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that

1 In accordance with Regulation 91(6)(b) of the European Communities (Statutory Audits) (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.

LOGO

CRH      105


Corporate Governance Report| continued

LOGO

has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) as of 31 December 2014. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive and the Finance Director have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date at the level of providing reasonable assurance.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management, including the Chief Executive and the Finance Director, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Compliance & Ethics

The Group Compliance & Ethics (C&E) programme continues to develop in scope and reach. The structure of the C&E organisation was realigned in 2014 to serve the new CRH Europe organisation. A CRH Europe Head of C&E was appointed from the existing Compliance pool. Business Unit Compliance Coordinators (BUCCs) were also appointed for Heavyside East, Heavyside West, Lightside and Distribution and a European Compliance Officer was appointed to assist the European Head of C&E.

CRH’s Code of Business Conduct1 (COBC) and related policies were updated and approved by the Board and the C&E team’s primary focus since then has been to ensure all relevant employees receive appropriate training. In the current training cycle over 32,000 employees have participated in COBC training and a further 11,000 have also undertaken advanced instruction on competition law and anti-bribery, corruption and fraud.

In addition, our development teams and procurement teams have received appropriate instruction on both our C&E Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Venture Due Diligence Programme and our Ethical Procurement Code. Our Supplier Code of Conduct was developed to communicate our minimum Corporate Social Responsibility requirements to existing and new suppliers to the Group and to outline how we ensure compliance with these requirements. Similar procedures have been developed for any engagements

Investor Relations Activities

Table 12

Formal Announcements,including the release of the annual and interim results and the issuance of interim management statements. These announcements are typically accompanied by presentations and webcasts or conference calls.
Investor Roadshows,typically held following the release of formal announcements, provide an opportunity for the management team to meet existing and/or potential investors in a concentrated set of meetings.
Industry Conferences:Attendance at key sector and investor conferences affords members of the senior management team the opportunity to engage with key investors and analysts.
Investor Briefings:In addition to regular contact with investors and analysts during the year, the Company periodically holds capital market days, which include presentations on various aspects of CRH’s operations and strategy and provide an opportunity for investors and analysts to meet with CRH’s wider management team.

Media Briefings:Each year, the Company provides media briefings on numerous issues.

 

with business partners. Further guidelines developed during the year include a Competition Law Toolbox – which gathers into one place various CRH 71guidelines, policies and notes to help the businesses comply with Competition Law requirements.


The following existing policies are under review;

The Competition/Antitrust Compliance Code
The Donations Policy
The Anti-Fraud Policy

The COBC has scored an “A” rating by New York Stock Exchange Governance Services and incorporates some welcome new features, including learning aids, an ethical-decision making guide and a clear focus on the core values of the Group: Integrity, Honesty and Respect for the law. It was translated and distributed during 2014 and related training is being migrated to an on-line module. A robust communication plan is in place to complement the training programme. A multi-lingual “hotline” facility – “Speak Up” is also available to employees as a secure channel to report ethical issues that concern them or suspected violations of our Codes. All hotline reports received are fully reviewed and investigated by appropriately qualified personnel.

The C&E programme has been integrated into our standard Internal Audit procedures and forms part of an annual management certification process. Its effectiveness is also regularly reviewed by the C&E function with appropriate oversight from senior management and theAudit Committee. The collective goal is to ensure the message is clearly understood that at CRH “there is never a good business reason to do the wrong thing”.

DirectorsSustainability and Corporate GovernanceSocial Responsibility

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) concepts are embedded in all CRH operations and activities.

Excellence in the areas ofhealth & safety, environment & climate change, governance and people & community is a daily priority of line management. The Group’s policies and implementation systems are summarised on pages 47 to 51. During 2014, CRH was again recognised by several leading socially responsible investment (SRI) agencies as being among the leaders in its sector in these important areas.

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate GovernanceCommunications with Shareholders

MembershipCommunications with shareholders are given high priority and the Group devotes considerable time and resources each year to shareholder engagement. We recognise the importance of effective dialogue as an integral element of good corporate governance. The Investor Relations team, together with the Chief Executive, Finance Director and other senior executives, meet regularly with institutional shareholders (each year covering over 50% of shareholder base). Detailed reports on the issues covered in those meetings and the views of shareholders are circulated to the Board after each group of meetings. Table 12 above provides a brief outline of the Board

It is our practice that a majoritynature of the Board comprises non-executive Directors, consideredactivities undertaken by the Board to be independent, and thatour Investor Relations team.

During 2014, the Chairman, is non-executive. At present, there are four executiveSenior Independent Director and nine non-executive Directors. Biographical details are set out on pages 14, 15, 68 and 69. While there is an ongoing processCompany Secretary participated in a number of planned refreshment and renewal, we consider the current size and compositionconference calls with some of the Board to be within a range which is appropriate. We also believe that the current sizeGroup’s major shareholders in advance of the Board is sufficiently large2014 Annual General Meeting. The meetings were organised to enable its Committeesprovide those shareholders with an opportunity to operate without undue reliancediscuss the resolutions on individual non-executive Directors, while being dynamicthe 2014 Annual General Meeting agenda and responsivecorporate governance matters generally.

In addition to the needsabove, major acquisitions are notified to the Stock Exchanges in accordance with the requirements of the Company. The spreadListing Rules and development updates, giving details of nationalities ofother acquisitions completed and major capital expenditure projects, are issued periodically (typically in January and July each year).

In addition, we respond throughout the Directors reflects the geographical reach of the Group and we consider that the Board as a whole has the appropriate blend of skills, knowledge and experience,year to

1

The Code of Business Conduct is applicable to all Group employees including the Chief Executive and senior financial officers. The Code promotes honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures and compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations and complies with the applicable code of ethics regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

106      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

correspondence from shareholders on a wide range of industries, regions and backgrounds, necessaryissues.

The Chief Executive made a presentation to leadshareholders at the Company. Directors are appointed for specified terms and are subject to annual re-election at the2014 Annual General Meeting and to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company.

None of the executive Directors is a non-executive director of a listed company.

As outlined below, the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for keeping the “bench-strength” of the Board, and the need for refreshment and renewal, under review.on CRH’s businesses.

Board succession policy and diversityGeneral Meetings

The Board plans for its own succession with the assistance of the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee. Independent consultants are engaged to search for suitable candidates to serve as non-executive Directors.

We are committed to ensuring that the Board is sufficiently diverse and appropriately balanced. In its work in the area of Board renewal, the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee looks at four criteria when considering candidates: (i) international business experience, particularly in the regions in which the Group operates or in which it intends to expand; (ii) skills, knowledge and expertise in areas relevant to the operation of the Board; (iii) diversity, including nationality and gender; and (iv) the need for an appropriately sized Board. During the ongoing process of Board renewal, each, or a combination, of these factors can take priority. Consequently, to date the Board has not set specific objectives in relation to diversity.

Independence of Directors

The independence of Board members is considered annually. The Board is assisted in this by the annual review carried out by the Senior Independent Director which addresses the independence of the individual members of the Board (see Performance appraisal and Board evaluation section below), and by the work of the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee, which annually reviews each Board member’s directorships and considers any relevant business relationships between Board members. We have concluded that all of the Directors bring independent judgement to bear on issues of strategy, performance, resources, key appointments and standards, and have determined that each of the non-executive Directors is independent. In reaching that conclusion, we considered the principles relating to independence contained in the 2010 Code, together with the guidance provided by a number of shareholder voting agencies, and have taken the view that independence is determined by a Director’s character, objectivity and integrity. Those principles and guidance highlight a number of factors that might appear to affect the independence of Directors, including former service as an executive, extended service on the Board and cross-directorships, while making it clear that a Director may be considered independent notwithstanding the presence of one or more of these factors.

Chairman

Kieran McGowan, who has been Chairman of the Group since May 2007, will retire as Chairman and from the Board at the conclusion of the 2012Company’s Annual General Meeting. On his appointment asMeeting (AGM), which is held in Ireland, affords individual shareholders the opportunity to question the Chairman Mr. McGowan met the independence criteria set out in the June 2006 Combined Code. The Board has

72    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

appointed Nicky Hartery as Chairman Designate. Mr. Hartery, who was appointed to the Board in June 2004 meets the independence criteria set out in the 2010 Code. The process used for the appointment of the new Chairman is set out on page 79.

The Chairman is responsible for the efficient and effective working of the Board. He ensures that Board agendas cover the key strategic issues confronting the Group, that the Board reviews and approves management’s plans for the Group and that Directors receive accurate, timely, clear and relevant information. He oversees the search for new Board members and is available to meet with, and hear the views of, institutional investors. While Mr. McGowan holds a number of other directorships (see details on page 69), the Board considers that these do not interfere with the discharge of his duties to CRH.

Senior Independent Director

Nicky Hartery has been the Senior Independent Director since May 2008. The Board has decided that Dan O’Connor will take on the role of Senior Independent Director when Mr. Hartery assumes the role of Chairman in May 2012.

Company Secretary

The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary is a matter for the Board. All Directors have accessattended the 2014 AGM. The Notice of the AGM, which specifies the time, date, place and the business to be transacted, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. At the meeting, resolutions are voted on by way of a poll using an electronic voting system. The votes of shareholders present at the meeting are added to the adviceproxy votes received in advance and servicesthe total number of votes for, against and withheld for each resolution are announced. This information is made available on the Company’s website following the meeting.

All other general meetings are called Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs). An EGM called for the passing of a special resolution requires at least 21 clear days’ notice.

A quorum for a general meeting of the Company Secretary, who is responsibleconstituted by five or more shareholders present in person and entitled to vote. The passing of resolutions at a meeting of the Company, other than special resolutions, requires a simple majority. To be passed, a special resolution requires a majority of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Shareholders have the right to attend, speak, ask questions and vote at general meetings. In accordance with Irish company law, the Company specifies record dates for general meetings, by which date shareholders must be registered in the Register of Members of the Company to be entitled to attend. Record dates are specified in the notes to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are complied with.

Terms of appointment of non-executive Directors

The standard terms of the letter of appointment of non-executive Directors are available for inspection at the Company’s registered office and at the Annual General Meeting.

Induction, training and development of Directors

New Directors are provided with extensive briefing materials on the Group and its operations, the procedures relating to the Board and its Committees and their duties and responsibilities as Directors under company law. The Chairman agrees a tailored and comprehensive induction programme with each new Director. The aim of the programme, which generally covers the first yearnotice of a new Director’s appointment, isgeneral meeting. Shareholders may exercise their right to provide them withvote by appointing, by electronic means or in writing, a detailed insight into the Group. The programme involves meeting with the Chief Executive, Chief Operating Officer, Finance Director, Company Secretary and key senior executives at Head Office and Divisional level. It covers areas such as strategy, development priorities, acquisition evaluation, organisation structure, succession planning, financing, corporate social responsibility, compliance and ethics, investor relations and risk management. New Directors also meet with the Senior Independent Directorproxy/proxies to discuss the most recent Board evaluation exercise and, after approximately six months, a session is organised with the Chairman to review progress. All Directors can also avail of opportunities to hear the views of and meet with the Group’s investors and analysts. Directors regularly receive copies of research and analysis conducted on CRH and the building materials sector. The Board receives regular updates from the external auditors in relation to regulatory and accounting developments. Updates in relation to other relevant matters, for example, changes in company law, are provided from time to time.

Throughout the year, Directors meet with key executives and, in the course of twice-yearly visits by the Board to Group locations, see the businesses at first hand and meet with local management teams.

For newly-appointed members of the Audit Committee, training arrangements include meeting with the key members of the external audit, internal audit and finance (Head Office and Divisional) teams and where required, relevant financial courses are provided. Committee members also receive details of relevant conferences organised by external parties. New members of the Remuneration Committee meet with the Committee’s remuneration consultants in the yearvote some or all of their appointment toshares. The requirements for the Committee.

CRH    73


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

Remunerationreceipt of Directors

Details of remuneration paid to the Directorsvalid proxy forms are set out in the notes to the notice convening the meeting and in the notes on the proxy form. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 5% of the issued share capital of the Company, has the right to requisition a general meeting. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 3% of the issued share capital of the Company, has the right to put an item on the agenda of an AGM or to table a draft resolution for inclusion in the agenda of a general meeting, subject to any contrary provision in Irish company law.

Going Concern

The Company’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Strategy Review section on pages 34 to 43. The financial position of the Company, its cash flows, liquidity position

and borrowing facilities are described in the Business Performance Review on pages 66 to 76. In addition, notes 20 to 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements include the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit, currency and liquidity risks.

The Company has considerable financial resources and a large number of customers and suppliers across different geographic areas and industries. In addition, the local nature of building materials means that the Group’s products are not usually shipped cross-border.

Having assessed the relevant business risks, the Directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage these risks successfully, and they have a reasonable expectation that the Company, and the Group as a whole, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Compliance Statement

Non-US companies such as CRH are exempt from most of the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. In common with companies listed on the Irish Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, CRH’s corporate governance practices reflect, inter alia, compliance with (a) domestic company law; (b) the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority and the Irish Stock Exchange; and (c) the Code, which is appended to the listing rules of the London and Irish Stock Exchanges.

CRH has adopted a robust set of Board governance principles, which reflect the Code and its principles-based approach

to corporate governance. Accordingly, the way in which CRH makes determinations of Directors’ independence differs from the NYSE rules. The Board has determined that, in its judgement, all of the non-executive Directors are independent. In doing so, however, the Board did not explicitly take into consideration the independence requirements outlined in the NYSE’s listing standards.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

The NYSE rules require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. CRH complies with Irish requirements, which are similar to the NYSE rules. The CRH Board, however, does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition on what are considered “material revisions”.

The following are available on the CRH website, www.crh.com:

Table 13

Corporate Governance section:

–      Terms of Reference ofAcquisitions Committee (amended December 2010)

–      Terms of Reference ofAudit Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofFinance Committee (amended February 2004)

–      Terms of Reference ofNomination & Corporate Governance Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofRemuneration Committee (amended December 2013)

–      The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company

–      Pre-approval policy for non-audit services provided by the auditors

–      Compliance & Ethics statement, Code of Business Conduct and Hotline contact numbers

–      The 2014 Remuneration Policy

Investors section:

–      Annual and Interim Reports, the Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interim Management Statements and copies of presentations to analysts and investors

–      News releases

–      Webcast recordings of key investor briefings

–      General Meeting dates, notices, shareholder circulars, presentations and poll results

–      Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, including questions regarding dividends and shareholder rights in respect of general meetings

LOGO

CRH        107


The Remuneration Committee consists of four non-executive Directors considered by the Board to be independent. They bring a range of experience of large organisations and public companies, including experience in the area of senior executive remuneration, to enable the Committee to fulfil its role. Their biographical details are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The main focus of the Committee is to:

–  determine and agree with the Board the Group’s policy on executive remuneration;

–  seek shareholder approval for the policy at least every three years;

–  ensure that CRH’s remuneration structures are fair and responsible; and

–  consider and approve remuneration packages for the executive Directors and the Chairman.

In addition, the Committee:

–  recommends and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for senior management; and

–  oversees the preparation of this Directors’ Remuneration Report.

In considering remuneration levels for executive Directors particularly, the Committee takes into account remuneration trends across the CRH Group, which has a diverse range of operations in 34 countries, in geographic regions which are often at different stages in the economic cycle.

Additional details in relation to the Committee, its role and responsibilities and how it operates are included in the Remuneration Committee section of the Corporate Governance report on page 104.

The Chief Executive attends meetings except when his own remuneration is being discussed.

Directors’ Remuneration Report

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

108        CRH


Introduction

LOGO

On behalf of theRemuneration Committee, I am pleased to introduce the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2014. The Remuneration Report (excluding the Remuneration Policy summary on pages 126 to 131), will be included on the agenda of the 2015 Annual General Meeting for shareholder consideration.

The purpose of CRH’s Remuneration Policy, which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, is to provide an appropriate framework to support the creation of value for shareholders over the longer term, the attraction and retention of key executives and succession planning, without paying more than is necessary. The full Remuneration Policy is available on the CRH website, www.crh.com.

2014 Performance

2014 was a year of growth and progress in terms of our aim of restoring margins and returns to peak levels in the coming years.

Recent Remuneration Snapshot:

•  Updated Remuneration Policy approved at 2014 AGM

•  New performance share plan adopted at 2014 AGM

•  Incentive payout levels linked to stretching performance criteria

•  Strong support from shareholders for policy and implementation

In addition, there was significant achievement regarding the Group’s multi-year divestment programme of €1.5 billion to €2.0 billion, with proceeds from disposals completed in 2014 of €0.35 billion since the programme was announced in August 2014.

Overall, CRH’s strong balance sheet and cash generation capability leave the Company well positioned to take advantage of value-creating acquisition opportunities.

In the context of the Group’s performance in 2014, and performance against individual and strategic goals, theRemuneration Committee has determined that the annual bonus levels for 2014 should be set at the maximum level of 150% for each of the executive Directors.

In accordance with CRH’s Remuneration Policy, approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, 25% of the 2014 bonus will be deferred into shares for a period of three years.

The basis for each bonus award is set out in detail on page 112. In line with evolving best practice, we have increased the level of disclosure in relation to payout levels to provide shareholders with a greater level of insight into the approach for determining bonus payments. We have also disclosed the targets for the bonus payments in respect of 2013 as these are no longer considered to be commercially sensitive. Similarly, theRemuneration Committee intends that the targets for the 2014 bonus plan will be disclosed in the 2015 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The 2014 Remuneration Policy also made provision for theRemuneration Committee to introduce clawback provisions, in addition to the malus2 provisions already in place for the annual bonus plan and the long-term performance share plan. The Committee has decided, in accordance with the provisions of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code, to introduce clawback provisions for the cash element of the annual bonus plan for 2015 and onwards.

The long-term awards made under the 2006 Performance Share Plan and the 2010 Share Option Scheme made in 2012 (each with a three year performance period 2012 - 2014) did not meet the relevant performance criteria required to vest and, consequently, those awards lapse in full. Further details are set out on pages 114 and 115.

Executive Director Salaries

As reported in the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report, following consideration of the scope of the Finance Director’s responsibilities and her performance since being appointed in 2010, the Committee decided that Maeve Carton’s salary should be increased, subject to continued

  Sales

+ 5% Return on Net Assets

      +150bps

  EBITDA (as defined)*

+11% Operating Cash  Flow

      +23%

  EPS

+33%1Net Debt

      -16%

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

1Based on adjusted 2013 EPS (excluding impairments and the related tax impact).

2Malus is a mechanism whereby the Remuneration Committee may decide not to release deferred share or performance share plan awards if an unusual event such as a material financial misstatement occurred, significant losses were incurred or the Company suffered significant reputational damage.

LOGO

CRH      109


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

individual and business performance, to €675,000 in two steps. Her salary increased to €625,000 (+9.7%) in 2014. TheRemuneration Committee has determined that it is appropriate to make the second increase (to €675,000) in respect of 2015 (+8%).

The Committee has also reviewed the salary levels for Albert Manifold and Mark Towe and determined that increases of 7.5% to €1,290,000 and 3% to US$1,420,000 respectively are appropriate. The increase for Albert Manifold reflects the speed with which he has developed in the Chief Executive role, demonstrated by the progress in the delivery of strategy and the improvement in returns and margins referred to above. TheRemuneration Committee also noted that the salary of Albert Manifold remains below the level of €1,450,000 awarded to the Chief Executive of CRH in 2008. The increase for Mark Towe is in line with increases across the general employee population in the United States.

2015 Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan

Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan in 2015 will be made at the same level as in 2014 and will continue to be based on TSR and adjusted cash flow. The adjusted cash flow targets have not yet been set by theRemuneration Committee and will be set when the outcome of the proposed acquisition of assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd is known. As in previous years, the targets will be demanding and aligned to value creation for shareholders, with significant stretch ensuring that only exceptional performance will result in maximum payout.

Remuneration Policy

As referred to in the Chairman’s introduction to the Annual Report on page 2, CRH has entered into a binding commitment to acquire certain assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd for a total enterprise value of €6.5 billion. In the context of this proposed acquisition, the Committee will review the remuneration policy during the

course of 2015 to ensure it remains appropriate for the needs of the business.

Conclusion

Shareholders play a crucial role in the design of appropriate, balanced and fair remuneration structures and, as I will retire from the Board of CRH following the 2015 Annual General Meeting, I would like to thank all those who have engaged with CRH during my tenure asRemuneration Committee Chairman, for their constructive approach to dialogue with the Company. I have no doubt that my successor, Don McGovern, will benefit from your continued strong support for CRH.

Dan O’Connor

Remuneration Committee Chairman

110      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Annual Statement on Remuneration

The following section sets out details of:

the remuneration paid to Directors in respect of 2014;

how CRH’s remuneration policy will operate for 2015; and

other areas of disclosure.

The Directors’ Remuneration Report, excluding the Remuneration Policy summary on pages 85126 to 96. The 2011 Report on Directors’ Remuneration131, will be presented

put to shareholders for the purposes of an advisory non-binding vote at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 97 May 2012.2015.

OwnershipThe Company is not seeking shareholder approval for a revised Remuneration Policy this year and, dealing by Directorstherefore, we have not included the full policy in CRH securities

Detailsthis report. We have, however, included the executive Director and non-executive Director policy tables, as well as details of the shares held by Directors are set out on page 90. CRH has a policy on dealings in securities that applies to all Directors and senior management. Under the policy, Directors are required to obtain clearance from the Chairman and Chief Executive before dealing in CRH securities. Directors and senior management are prohibited from dealing in CRH securities during designated prohibited periods and at any time at which the individual is in possession of insideExecutive’s service contract as information (as defined in the Market Abuse (Directive 2003/6/EC) Regulations 2005). The policy adopts the terms of the Model Code, as set out in the Listing Rules published by the UK Listing Authority (which has been amended in relation to Irish company law and taxation references).

Performance appraisal and Board evaluation

The Senior Independent Director conducts an annual review of corporate governance, the independence of Board members, the operation and performance of the Board, and its Committees, the effectiveness of Board communications and the performance of the Chairman. This is achieved through discussion in one-to-one sessions with each Director. The meetings, which cover specific topics and allow for free-ranging discussion, provide a forum for an open and frank discourse. The Senior Independent Director circulates a written report to the Board each year, which summarises the outcome of the review and sets out any recommendations from Board members in relation to areas where improvements can be made. Consideration of the Senior Independent Director’s report is a formal agenda item at a scheduled Board meeting each year. This evaluation process will be facilitated in 2012 by a third party expert in this area. This is dealt with further in the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee section on pages 78 and 79.

A review of individual Directors’ performance is conducted by the Chairman and each Director is provided with feedback gathered from other members of the Board. Performance is assessed against a number of measures, including the ability of the Director to contribute to the development of strategy, to understand the major risks affecting the Group, to contribute to the cohesion of the Board, to commit the time required to fulfil the role and to listen to and respect the views of other Directors and the management team. As part of that review process the Chairman discusses with each individual their training and development needs and, where appropriate, agrees for suitable arrangements to be put in place to address those needs.

Directors’ retirement and re-election

All Directors retire at each Annual General Meeting and, unless they are stepping down from the Board, submit themselves to shareholders for re-election. Re-appointment is not automatic. Directors who are seeking re-election are subject to a performance appraisal, which is overseen by the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee.

Board meetings and time commitment

There were eight full meetings of the Board during 2011. Details of Directors’ attendance at those meetings are set out in the table on page 75. Each year, additional meetings, to consider specific matters, are held when and if required.

The Chairman sets the agenda for each meeting, in consultation with the Chief Executive and Company Secretary. In addition to the Group budget, trading results, large acquisitions, financial results and reports and regular Board matters, during the course of the year the Board receives updates on health and safety,shareholders.

 

74    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

with a particular focus on the Group’s fatality elimination programme, environmental issues, human resources and the Company’s investor relations programme. A report on the performance of acquisitions against the original Board proposal following three years of Group ownership is also considered by the Board. In July, the Board meeting is held over two days, with the main focus being on Group strategy. The Chief Executive regularly updates the non-executive Directors, in sessions at which other executive Directors are not present, regarding succession planning for senior management in each Division. Board papers are circulated to Directors in advance of meetings. Directors can, if they wish, obtain their papers electronically by way of a secure application for portable electronic devices.

Two visits are made each year by the Board to Group operations; one in Europe and one in North America. Each visit lasts between three and five days and incorporates a scheduled Board meeting. In 2011, these visits were to The Netherlands in Europe and to the Michigan area in the United States.

The non-executive Directors met twice during 2011 without executives being present.

Prior to their appointment, potential non-executive Directors are made aware of the calendar of meetings and are asked to confirm that they are able to allocate sufficient time to meet the expectations of their role. The agreement of the Chairman is required before accepting additional commitments that might impact adversely on the time they are able to devote as a non-executive Director of the Company.

Attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings during the year ended 31 December 2011

    Board   Acquisitions   Audit   Finance   Nomination     Remuneration     
    A     B     A     B     A     B     A     B     A     B     A     B  

E.J. Bärtschi (appointed 26 October 2011)

   2     2                                                    

M. Carton

   8     8     3     3               4     4                      

W.P. Egan

   8     8                                   4     4     7     7  

U-H. Felcht

   8     6               9     7     4     4                      

N. Hartery

   8     8                                   4     4     7     7  

J.M. de Jong

   8     8               9     9                                

J.W. Kennedy

   8     8                                   4     2     7     6  

M. Lee

   8     8     3     3               4     4     4     4            

K. McGowan

   8     8     3     3               4     4     4     4            

A. Manifold

   8     8     3     3                                          

D.N. O’Connor

   8     8     3     3     9     9                                

J.M.C. O’Connor (retired 4 May 2011)

   2     2               3     3                                

W.I. O’Mahony (retired 31 December 2011)

   8     8     3     2               4     3                      

M.S. Towe

   8     8                                                    

Column A - indicates the number of meetings held during the period the Director was a member of the Board and/or Committee.

Column B - indicates the number of meetings attended during the period the Director was a member of the Board and/or Committee.

Mr. Felcht was unable to attend some meetings during the course of 2011 due to diary conflicts and personal circumstances.

Committees of the Board1

The Board has established five permanent Committees to assist in the execution of its responsibilities. These are the Acquisitions Committee, the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee and the Remuneration Committee. Ad hoc committees are formed from time to time to deal with specific matters.

Each of the permanent Committees has terms of reference, under which authority is delegated to them by the Board. The terms of reference are available on the Group’s website,www.crh.com. The Chairman of each Committee reports to the Board on its deliberations, and minutes of all Committee meetings are circulated to all Directors.

1The terms of reference of these committees comply fully with the 2010 Code requirements; CRH considers that they are generally responsive to the relevant NYSE rules but may not address all aspects of these rules.

CRH    75


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

The current membership of each Committee, and each member’s length of service, is set out on page 70. Attendance at meetings held in 2011 is set out in the table on page 75.

Chairmen of the Committees attend the Annual General Meeting and are available to answer questions from shareholders.

During the year each of the relevant Committees reviewed its performance and terms of reference.

Acquisitions Committee

The role of thisAcquisitions Committee is to approve acquisitions, divestments and capital expenditure projects within limits agreed by the Board.

Audit CommitteeMembers

This Committee consistsThe biographies of four non-executive Directors, considered by the Board to be independent1. As at the date of this Report, the Board has determined that Mr. Jan Maarten de Jong and Mr. Dan O’Connor are the Committee’s financial experts. It will be seen from the Directors’ biographical details, appearing on pages 68 and 69, that the members of theAcquisitions Committee bring are set out on pages 87 to it experience and expertise from a wide range89.

The tenure of industries, including the financial services sector.

Theeach Committee2 met nine times during 2011. While its terms of reference, which were last updated in 2010, remained unchanged, the Committee reorganised its calendar of meetings in 2011 resulting in a reduction in meetings (from 14 in 2009 and 2010). The Finance Director and the Head of Internal Audit normally attend meetings of the Committee, while the Chief Executive and other executive Directors attend when necessary. The external auditors attend the majority of Committee meetings and report on any issues they believe should be brought to the attention of the Committee; in addition, they have direct access to the Committee Chairman at all times. During the year, the Committee met with the Head of Internal Audit and with the external auditors in the absence of management.

In 2011, the Committee reviewed, and discussed with management the content of, the Company’s interim management statements, the 2010 preliminary results announcement/Annual Report and financial statements, the 2010 Annual Report on Form 20-F, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and the interim report for the period ended 30 June 2011. In February 2011, the Committee approved the annual internal audit plan and, in July, the external auditors presented their audit plans for the 2011 audit. In February 2012, at the meeting at which the 2011 year-end financial statements were considered, the Committee received a report from the external auditors in relation to the audit process. Each year, the Committee also considers a report from the external auditors containing their observations and comments on issues that arose during the audit.

Throughout the year, the Committee received reports and updates from the Head of Internal Audit in relation to internal audit reviews, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 20023 and the arrangements in place to enable employees to raise concerns, in confidence, in relation to possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters.

Assessments of the Internal Audit function are carried out periodically by management and validated by an independent third party assessor. The most recent assessment was conducted in late 2009, during which no major weaknesses were identified; the assessment did result in a number of recommendations, most of which have been implemented, and the Committee receives updates on the status of the implementation of the remaining recommendations. The Committee approves Internal Audit’s charter and any amendments thereto.

1The Board has determined that all of the non-executive Directors on the Audit Committee are independent according to the requirements of Rule 10A 3 of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2Attendance by non-independent directors and management is by invitation only.

3A copy of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 can be obtained from the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s website,www.sec.gov.

76    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance member is as follows:

 

 

 

In 2011, the Committee met with senior finance personnel from the Group’s operations to discuss inter-alia, internal audit review findings, the implementation of resulting changes to control structures, work in relation to improving the control environment and culture in each Division, co-ordination with the work of the external auditors, actions being taken to prevent fraud and the harmonisation of IT platforms, where appropriate, across the Group.

As part of its response to the difficult trading conditions in recent years, the Group has implemented a programme of cost savings and has periodically announced updates on the annualised savings under that programme. The Head of Internal Audit reviews these savings, and the related implementation costs, and reports his findings to the Committee.

During the year, the Committee reviewed the workings in relation to goodwill impairment testing and the sensitivity analysis referred to in note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and discussed the outcome of the process with management and the external auditors in the context of developments in the wider industry.

The Board has delegated responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to the Audit Committee. Further details in relation to the Committee’s work in this area are set out in the section onRisk Management and Internal Controls on page 82.

The Committee regularly reviews the position in relation to the implementation of plans to mitigate the Group’s pension scheme liabilities. The Committee also regularly reviews the structures in place to ensure the Group complies with its obligations, particularly under competition and anti-corruption legislation throughout the world.

Under its terms of reference, the Audit Committee makes recommendations to the Board in relation to the appointment of the external auditors.

A number of factors are taken into account by the Committee in assessing whether to recommend the auditors for re-appointment or to seek other competitive bids for the audit. These include the quality of reports provided to the Audit Committee and the Board and the quality of advice given; the level of understanding demonstrated of the Group’s business and industry; the objectivity of the auditors’ views on the financial controls around the Group and their ability to co-ordinate a global audit, and the results of formal evaluations of the auditors.

Ernst & Young have been the Group’s auditors since 1988. Following an evaluation carried out in 2009, the Committee recommended to the Board that Ernst & Young be retained as the Group’s external auditors. There are no contractual obligations which act to restrict the Audit Committee’s choice of external auditor. The Committee has decided that such evaluations should be carried out at least every five years, with periodic interim reviews, and it monitors the implementation of the recommendations made as part of the evaluation process. The Committee considers the risk of withdrawal by Ernst & Young from the market and the potential impact on the Group, were that eventuality to materialise.

The Committee has put in place safeguards to ensure that the independence of the audit is not compromised. Such safeguards include: seeking confirmation from the external auditors that they are, in their professional judgement, independent from the Group; obtaining from the external auditors an account of all relationships between the auditors and the Group; monitoring the Group’s policy prohibiting the employment of former staff of the external auditors, who were part of the CRH audit team, in senior management positions until two years have elapsed since the completion of the audit, monitoring the number of former employees of the external auditors currently employed in senior positions in the Group and assessing whether those appointments impair, or appear to impair, the auditors’ judgement or independence; considering whether, taken as a whole, the various relationships between the Group and the external auditors impair, or appear to impair, the auditors’ judgement or independence; and reviewing the economic importance of the Group to the external auditors and assessing whether that importance impairs, or appears to impair, the external auditors’ judgement or independence.

CRH    77


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

N. Hartery2.5 years
M. Carton4.5 years
U-H. Felcht3.0 years
J.W. Kennedy0.5 years
A. Manifold6.0 years

 

 

The Group has a policy governing the conduct of non-audit work by the auditors1. The policy, which was updated in 2011, is available on the CRH website,www.crh.com. Under the policy, the external auditors are prohibited from performing services where they may be required to audit their own work, participate in activities that would normally be undertaken by management; are remunerated through a ‘success fee’ structure, where success is dependent on the audit; or act in an advocacy role for the Group. Other than the above, the Group does not impose an automatic ban on the external auditors undertaking non-audit work. The external auditors are permitted to provide non-audit services that are not, or are not perceived to be, in conflict with auditor independence, providing they have the skill, competenceMr. P. Kennedy and integrity to carry out the work and are considered by the Committee to be the most appropriate to undertake such work in the best interests of the Group. The engagement of the external auditors to provide any non-audit a services must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Committee. The pre-approval policy specifies the services that are prohibited and the services which have general pre-approval. The Committee has delegated to the Finance Director responsibility for confirming whether a service, which has general pre-approval, can be provided by Ernst & Young. The Finance Director reports regularlyMr. H. Rottinghuis were appointed to the Committee on services which have been approved.25 February 2015.

In 2011, the external auditors provided a number of audit-related and non-audit services, including Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404/regulatory reporting; services in relation to Securities and Exchange Commission registrations in the United States; work associated with bond and treasury issues; and due diligence services associated with proposed acquisitions. They were also engaged during 2011 in a number of jurisdictions in which the Group operates to provide help with local tax compliance, advice on taxation laws and other related matters; assignments which typically involve relatively small fees. The Auditattendance atAcquisitions Committeemeetings is satisfied that the external auditors’ knowledge of the Group was an important factor in choosing them to provide these services. The Committee is also satisfied that the fees paid to Ernst & Young for non-audit work, which amounted to circa 20% of the consolidated audit fee, did not compromise their independence or integrity. Details of the amounts paid to the external auditors during the year for audit and other services are set out in note 4table 11 below.

Role and Responsibilities

TheAcquisitions Committee has been delegated authority by the Board to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 124.approve acquisitions and disposals and large capital expenditure projects up to agreed limits.

The Group external audit engagement partner is replaced every five years.

Finance Committee

ThisFinance Committee which advises the Board on the financial requirements of the Group and on appropriate funding arrangements, considers and makes recommendations to the Board in relation to the issue and buy-back of shares and debt instruments and to the Group’s financing arrangements; considers and makes recommendations to the Board in relation to dividend levels on the Ordinary shares; keeps the Board advised of the financial implications of Board decisions in relation to acquisitions; assists management, at their request, in considering any financial or taxation aspect of the Group’s affairs.

During 2011, the Committee considered a review of the Group’s listing arrangements, which resulted, in December 2011, in the re-classification of CRH’s listing of Ordinary shares on the Irish Stock Exchange from a primary listing to a secondary listing (the “Listing Re-classification”). CRH retained the premium listing of its Ordinary shares on the London Stock Exchange and there was no change to its listing of American Depositary Shares on the New York Stock Exchange. The Listing Re-classification facilitated the Group’s inclusion in the FTSE 100 and FTSE All Share indices.

Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee

This Committee consists of four independent non-executive Directors. The Committee has recommended to the Board that, in accordance with evolving governance norms in some regions, the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee should be made up entirely of non-executive Directors. Accordingly, the Chief Executive stepped down from the Committee in February 2012. Mr. Lee continues to be consulted on

1The term of any general pre-approval is twelve months from the date of pre-approval.Members

78    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

issues related to Board, senior management succession and corporate governance developments and is invited to attend meetings of the Committee when appropriate. The Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in ensuring that the composition of the Board and its Committees is appropriate to the needs of the Group; for keeping corporate governance developments under review and recommending changes, where appropriate, to the Board; for monitoring compliance with governance codes; and for reviewing the content of the Corporate Governance Report to shareholders.

In 2010, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Company appoint an external service provider to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board at least once every three years. The first evaluation will take place in 2012 and will supplement existing processes and reviews carried out by the Chairman and the Senior Independent Director (as outlined in the Performance appraisal and Board evaluation section of this Report on page 74). A number of potential providers based in Ireland and the UK were considered. The provider which the Committee recommended to the Board, and which was subsequently engaged, is based in the UK and has an extensive record in facilitating Board evaluations in large listed companies both in Ireland and the UK. While the provider is part of an organisation which also supplies software solutions to the Group, the Committee is satisfied that the annual value of the relevant contracts is not material to either party. The Committee has agreed the terms of reference for the evaluation and will review the results.

The factors taken into account by the Committee in considering the compositionbiographies of the Board are set out in the policy for Board renewal which is detailed on page 72. The Committee establishes processes for the identification of suitable candidates for appointment to the Board and oversees succession planning for the Board and senior management. Non-executive Directors are typically expected to serve two three-year terms, although they may be invited to serve for a further period. The Committee keeps the tenure of Board members under review, with the aim of ensuring phased renewal and refreshment, particularly when a number of non-executive Directors are appointed in any one year.

During 2011 and in the year to date, the Committee identified, and recommended to the Board, two suitable candidates for appointment as non-executive Directors, Ernst Bärtschi and Heather Ann McSharry.

To facilitate the search for suitable candidates to serve as non-executive Directors, the Committee uses the services of independent consultants. When prospective candidates have been identified, each member of the Committee meets with them.

The Committee led the succession process for the appointment of Mr. McGowan’s successor as Chairman and, having sought the views of each Director in relation to the filling of this position, recommended to the Board that Mr. Hartery be appointed as Chairman Designate. The Committee was, in the absence of Mr. McGowan and Mr. Hartery, chaired by Mr. Egan when considering its recommendation. The Committee set out the duties, responsibilities and time commitment required by Mr. McGowan’s successor and determined that, due to the calibre of internal candidates, there was no requirement to seek external candidates. Consequently, the position of Chairman was not advertised and external consultants were not engaged. Mr. Hartery is a non-executive Director of Musgrave Group plc (an unlisted public limited company), Eircom Limited and is a business consultant.

As referred to above in the section on Independence of Directors, each year the Committee reviews details of the non-CRH directorships of each Director, including any relationship between those companies and the Group. The Committee also reviews any business relationships between individual Board members.

Remuneration Committee

This Committee consists of three non-executive Directors considered by the Board to be independent and is chaired by the Senior Independent Director. The Directors’ biographical details, on pages 68 and 69, demonstrate that the members of theFinance Committee bring to it a wide range of experience in large organisations and public companies, including experience in the area of senior executive remuneration. The Committee receives advice from Mercer, a leading compensation and benefit consultant. The Chief Executive is fully consulted about remuneration proposals. A statement regarding other services provided by Mercer to the Group is available on the CRH website,www.crh.com.

CRH    79


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

In 2011, the Committee determined the salaries of the executive Directors and the level of awards made under the performance-related incentive plans, which were based on measured targets. The Committee set the remuneration of the Chairman and reviewed the remuneration of senior management. It also approved an award of share options to the executive Directors and key management under the 2010 Share Option Scheme, which was approved by shareholders in May 2010 (the 2010 Scheme), and the conditional allocation of shares under the 2006 Performance Share Plan. In addition, the Committee approved the partial release of awards made under the 2006 Performance Share Plan in 2008 and released deferred shares awarded in 2008.

The Committee oversees the preparation of the Report on Directors’ Remuneration, which contains details on pages 85 to 96 of the Group’s remuneration policy, the structure of executive Directors’ remuneration, awards made under the Group’s share incentive plans, the factors taken into account when assessing the level of vesting under the Performance Share Plan and executive Directors’ pension arrangements.

Following the Listing Re-classification referred to on page 78, the Committee determined that it remained appropriate for CRH, as an Irish incorporated company, to continue to have regard to the guidelines and recommendations of the Irish Association of Investment Managers (IAIM) in relation to share incentive plans. In early 2012, the IAIM approved amendments to the performance criteria in respect of the grant of options under the 2010 Scheme in 2012. Subsequently, the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee wrote to the Group’s major shareholders in relation to the changes. Further details in relation to the performance criteria for the 2010 Scheme are set out on pages 87 to 8989.

The tenure of each Committee member is as follows:

N. Hartery2.5 years
M. Carton4.5 years
U-H. Felcht7.5 years
J.W. Kennedy0.5 years

Mr. E.J. Bärtschi and Ms. H.A. McSharry were appointed to the Committee on 25 February 2015.

The attendance atFinance Committeemeetings is set out in table 11 below.

Role and Responsibilities

TheFinance Committee is responsible for:

advising the Board on the financial requirements of the Group and on

 

 

Attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings during the year ended 31 December 2014

 

  

 

 

 

 

Table 11

 

 

  

 

     

 

Board

 

  Acquisitions  Audit  Finance  Nomination  Remuneration 
   No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  No. of Meetings  
   Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total  Attended  Total   Attended  
 

E.J. Bärtschi

  8  8        10  10                    
 

M. Carton

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

W.P. Egan

  8  7                    7  7  8   8  
 

U-H. Felcht

  8  7  8  8        7  7              
 

N. Hartery

  8  8  8  8        7  7  7  7  8   8  
 

J.M. de Jong*

  2  2  1  1        2  2              
 

J.W. Kennedy

  8  8  2  2              5  5  7   7  
 

D.A. McGovern, Jr.  

  8  8        10  10                    
 

H.A. McSharry

  8  8        10  10                    
 

A. Manifold

  8  8  8  8        7  7              
 

D.N. O’Connor

  8  8        5  5        7  7  8   8  
 

H. Th. Rottinghuis**

  8  8        5  4                    
 

M.S. Towe

  8  8                                
 *   Retired May 2014        
 ** Appointed to Board February 2014        
 

Note: See summary of Board Committee changes in table 10 on page 103.

 

        

104      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

appropriate funding arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to the issue and buy-back of shares and debt instruments and on the Group’s financing arrangements;

considering and making recommendations to the Board in relation to dividend levels on the Ordinary Shares;

keeping the Board advised of the financial implications of Board decisions in relation to acquisitions;

assisting management, at their request, in considering any financial or taxation aspect of the Group’s affairs; and

reviewing the Group’s insurance arrangements.

Risk Management and Internal Control

The Board has delegated responsibility for the monitoring of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to theAudit Committee1. Such systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and, in the case of internal control systems, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared subject to oversight and control of the Finance Director, ensuring correct data is captured from Group locations and all required information for disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements is provided. An appropriate control framework has been put in place around the recording of appropriate eliminating journals and other adjustments. The Consolidated Financial Statements are reviewed by the CRH Financial Reporting and Disclosure Group prior to being reviewed by theAudit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Directors confirm that the Group’s ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing its principal risks and uncertainties (as outlined on pages 52 to 63) is in accordance with the updated Turnbull guidance(Internal Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code) published in October 2005. The process has been in place throughout the accounting period and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and financial statements.

Group management has responsibility for major strategic development and financing decisions. Responsibility for operational issues is devolved, subject to limits of authority, to product group and operating company management. Management at all levels is responsible for internal control over the business functions that have been delegated. This embedding of the system of internal control throughout the Group’s operations ensures that the organisation is capable of responding quickly to evolving business risks, and that significant internal control issues,

should they arise, are reported promptly to appropriate levels of management.

During the year, the Board andAuditCommitteereceived, on Directors’ Remuneration.a regular basis, reports from management on the key risks to the business and the steps being taken to manage such risks. They also considered whether the significant risks faced by the Group were being identified, evaluated and appropriately managed, having regard to the balance of risk, cost and opportunity. In addition, theAudit Committee met with internal auditors on a regular basis and satisfied itself as to the adequacy of the Group’s internal control system; met with the Chairman of theRemuneration Committee to ensure that the Group’s remuneration policies and structures were appropriate and in line with the Group’s risk tolerance; and reviewed the principal risks and uncertainties outlined on pages 52 to 63. TheAudit Committee also met with, and received reports from, the external auditors. The Chairman of theAudit Committee reported regularly to the Board on all significant issues considered by the Committee and the minutes of its meetings were circulated to all Directors.

The Directors confirm that, in addition to the guidelinesmonitoring carried out by theAudit Committee under its Terms of Reference, they have reviewed the effectiveness of the IAIM,Group’s risk management and internal control systems up to and including the Group takes cognisancedate of remuneration guidelines issued by institutional shareholders and the provisions of Schedule A to the 2010 Code will be followed in relation to the design of performance-related incentive schemes.

A Committeeapproval of the Chairmanfinancial statements. This had regard to all material controls, including financial, operational and the executive Directors makes recommendations to the Board in relation to the remuneration of the non-executive Directors. In accordance with the Articles of Association, shareholders set the maximum aggregate amount of the fees payable to non-executive Directors. The current limit was set by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in 2005.

On the recommendation of the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee, the Committee’s terms of reference were updated in 2010 to the effectcompliance controls that could affect the Group’s Chairman may be a member of the Committee provided his/her tenurebusiness.

Management’s Report on the Board does not exceed 12 years. Accordingly, Mr. McGowan ceased to be a member of the Committee in 2010. He is consulted on Remuneration matters and is invited to attend meetings of the Committee when appropriate. Mr. Hartery, who was appointed to the Board in 2004 will remain a member of the Committee when he becomes Chairman in May 2012.

Communications with ShareholdersInternal Control over Financial Reporting

Communications with shareholders are given high priority and we communicate with shareholders in a number of ways. There is regular dialogue with institutional shareholders and proxy voting agencies, as well as presentations and webcasts at the time of the release of the annual and interim results. Conference calls are held following the issuance of interim management statements and major announcements by the Group, which afford Directors the opportunity to hear investors’ reactions to the announcements and their views on other issues. Interim management statements are issued in May and November. Major acquisitions are notified to the Stock Exchanges inIn accordance with the requirements of the Listing Rules. In addition, development updates, giving details of other acquisitions completed and major capital expenditure projects, are usually issued in January and July each year.

During 2011, the Board received and considered reports on the issues raised by investors in the courseRule 13a-15 of the presentations and meetings.

The Group’s website,www.crh.com, providesUS Securities Exchange Act, the full textfollowing report is provided by management in respect of the AnnualCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Interim Reports,Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the Annual Report on Form 20-F, whichsupervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,

and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our management is filed annuallyresponsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the US Securities Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our Company’s published Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes under generally accepted accounting principles.

In connection with the United Statespreparation of the Company’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission.

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the CSR Report, interim management statements and copies of presentationsCompany has elected to analysts and investors. News releases are made available in the Media sectionexclude an assessment of the website immediately after releaseinternal controls of acquisitions made during the year 2014. These acquisitions, which are listed in note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, constituted 0.7% of total assets and 1.2% of net assets, as of 31 December 2014 and 0.6% and 0.8% of revenue and Group profit for the financial year, respectively, for the year then ended.

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this assessment, management has concluded and hereby reports that as of 31 December 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our auditors, Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, who have audited the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014, have audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Their report, on which an unqualified opinion is expressed thereon, is included on page 134.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During 2014, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that

1 In accordance with Regulation 91(6)(b) of the European Communities (Statutory Audits) (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.

 

80    CRHLOGO


Directors and Corporate Governance

 

CRH      105

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE -


Corporate Governance Report| continued

 

 

 

Stock Exchanges. WebcastsLOGO

has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Evaluation of key investor briefings are broadcast liveDisclosure Controls and are made availableProcedures

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures as recordingsdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) as of 31 December 2014. Based on that evaluation, the Media section.Chief Executive and the Finance Director have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date at the level of providing reasonable assurance.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management, including the Chief Executive and the Finance Director, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Compliance & Ethics

The Group Compliance & Ethics (C&E) programme continues to develop in scope and reach. The structure of the C&E organisation was realigned in 2014 to serve the new CRH Europe organisation. A CRH Europe Head of C&E was appointed from the existing Compliance pool. Business Unit Compliance Coordinators (BUCCs) were also appointed for Heavyside East, Heavyside West, Lightside and Distribution and a European Compliance Officer was appointed to assist the European Head of C&E.

CRH’s Code of Business Conduct1 (COBC) and related policies were updated and approved by the Board and the C&E team’s primary focus since then has been to ensure all relevant employees receive appropriate training. In the current training cycle over 32,000 employees have participated in COBC training and a further 11,000 have also undertaken advanced instruction on competition law and anti-bribery, corruption and fraud.

In addition, our development teams and procurement teams have received appropriate instruction on both our C&E Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Venture Due Diligence Programme and our Ethical Procurement Code. Our Supplier Code of Conduct was developed to communicate our minimum Corporate Social Responsibility requirements to existing and new suppliers to the Group and to outline how we respond throughoutensure compliance with these requirements. Similar procedures have been developed for any engagements

Investor Relations Activities

Table 12

Formal Announcements,including the release of the annual and interim results and the issuance of interim management statements. These announcements are typically accompanied by presentations and webcasts or conference calls.
Investor Roadshows,typically held following the release of formal announcements, provide an opportunity for the management team to meet existing and/or potential investors in a concentrated set of meetings.
Industry Conferences:Attendance at key sector and investor conferences affords members of the senior management team the opportunity to engage with key investors and analysts.
Investor Briefings:In addition to regular contact with investors and analysts during the year, the Company periodically holds capital market days, which include presentations on various aspects of CRH’s operations and strategy and provide an opportunity for investors and analysts to meet with CRH’s wider management team.

Media Briefings:Each year, the Company provides media briefings on numerous issues.

with business partners. Further guidelines developed during the year include a Competition Law Toolbox – which gathers into one place various CRH guidelines, policies and notes to numerous letters from shareholders on a wide range of issues.help the businesses comply with Competition Law requirements.

The Chief Executive presentedfollowing existing policies are under review;

The Competition/Antitrust Compliance Code
The Donations Policy
The Anti-Fraud Policy

The COBC has scored an overview of CRH strategy to shareholders at the 2011 Annual General Meeting. The presentation, which also set out management’s response to the market challenges of recent years, is available“A” rating by New York Stock Exchange Governance Services and incorporates some welcome new features, including learning aids, an ethical-decision making guide and a clear focus on the core values of the Group: Integrity, Honesty and Respect for the law. It was translated and distributed during 2014 and related training is being migrated to an on-line module. A robust communication plan is in place to complement the training programme. A multi-lingual “hotline” facility – “Speak Up” is also available to employees as a secure channel to report ethical issues that concern them or suspected violations of our Codes. All hotline reports received are fully reviewed and investigated by appropriately qualified personnel.

The C&E programme has been integrated into our standard Internal Audit procedures and forms part of an annual management certification process. Its effectiveness is also regularly reviewed by the C&E function with appropriate oversight from senior management and theAudit Committee. The collective goal is to ensure the message is clearly understood that at CRH website.“there is never a good business reason to do the wrong thing”.

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) isconcepts are embedded in all CRH operations and activities.

Excellence in the areas ofhealth & safety, environment & climate change, governance environmental (including climate change), health and safety and social performancepeople & community is a daily key priority of line management. GroupThe Group’s policies and implementation systems are described in detail in the CSR Reportsummarised on the Group’s website,www.crh.com.pages 47 to 51. During 2011,2014, CRH was again recognised by several leading socially responsible investment (SRI) agencies as being among the leaders in its sector in this area.these important areas.

Communications with Shareholders

CodeCommunications with shareholders are given high priority and the Group devotes considerable time and resources each year to shareholder engagement. We recognise the importance of Business Conducteffective dialogue as an integral element of good corporate governance. The Investor Relations team, together with the Chief Executive, Finance Director and other senior executives, meet regularly with institutional shareholders (each year covering over 50% of shareholder base). Detailed reports on the issues covered in those meetings and the views of shareholders are circulated to the Board after each group of meetings. Table 12 above provides a brief outline of the nature of the activities undertaken by our Investor Relations team.

During 2014, the Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary participated in a number of conference calls with some of the Group’s major shareholders in advance of the 2014 Annual General Meeting. The CRH Codemeetings were organised to provide those shareholders with an opportunity to discuss the resolutions on the 2014 Annual General Meeting agenda and corporate governance matters generally.

In addition to the above, major acquisitions are notified to the Stock Exchanges in accordance with the requirements of Business Conduct, which was updated recentlythe Listing Rules and development updates, giving details of other acquisitions completed and major capital expenditure projects, are issued periodically (typically in January and July each year).

In addition, we respond throughout the year to ensure it continues

1

The Code of Business Conduct is applicable to all Group employees including the Chief Executive and senior financial officers. The Code promotes honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures and compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations and complies with the applicable code of ethics regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

106      CRH


Corporate Governance Report| continued

correspondence from shareholders on a wide range of issues.

The Chief Executive made a presentation to beshareholders at the forefront of best practice in this area, is applicable to all Group employees1. The updated Code is available2014 Annual General Meeting on the Group’s website,www.crh.com, where it will be available in 20 languages during the course of 2012. Regional hotline facilities are in place, to enable employees to report suspected breaches of the Code.CRH’s businesses.

General Meetings

The Company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM), which is held in Ireland, affords individual shareholders the opportunity to question the Chairman and the Board. All Directors attended the 20112014 AGM. The Notice of the AGM, which specifies the time, date, place and the business to be transacted, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. At the meeting, resolutions are voted on by meansway of a poll using an electronic voting system. The votes of shareholders present at the meeting are added to the proxy votes received in advance and the total number of votes for, against and withheld for each resolution are announced. This information is made available on the Company’s website following the meeting.

All other general meetings are called Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs). An EGM called for the passing of a special resolution must be called byrequires at least 21 clear days’ notice.

A quorum for a general meeting of the Company is constituted by five or more shareholders present in person and entitled to vote. The passing of resolutions at a meeting of the Company, other than special resolutions, requires a simple majority. To be passed, a special resolution requires a majority of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Shareholders have the right to attend, speak, ask questions and vote at general meetings. In accordance with Irish company law, the Company specifies record dates for general meetings, by which date shareholders must be registered in the Register of Members of the Company to be entitled to attend. Record dates are specified in the notes to the Noticenotice of a general meeting. Shareholders may exercise their right to vote by appointing, a proxy/proxies, by electronic means or in writing, a proxy/proxies to vote some or all of their shares. The requirements for the receipt of valid proxy forms are set out in the notes to the Noticenotice convening the meeting and in the notes on the proxy form. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 5% of the issued share capital of the Company, has the right to requisition a general meeting. A shareholder, or a group of shareholders, holding at least 3% of the issued share capital of the

1Including the Chief Executive and senior financial officers. The Code promotes honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures and compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations and complies with the applicable code of ethics regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

CRH    81


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

Company, has the right to put an item on the agenda of an AGM or to table a draft resolution for inclusion in the agenda of a general meeting, subject to any contrary provision in Irish company law.

The Group’s website,www.crh.com, contains answers to questions frequently asked by shareholders (FAQs), including questions regarding shareholder rights in respect of general meetings. The FAQs can be accessed in the Investors section of the website under “Equity Investors”.

Risk Management and Internal Control

The Board has delegated responsibility for the monitoring of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems to the Audit Committee1. Such systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and, in the case of internal control systems, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared subject to oversight and control of the Finance Director, ensuring correct data is captured from Group locations and all required information for disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements is provided. An appropriate control framework has been put in place around the recording of appropriate eliminations and other adjustments. The Consolidated Financial Statements are reviewed by the CRH Financial Review and Disclosure Group prior to being reviewed by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Directors confirm that the Group’s ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing its principal risks and uncertainties (as outlined on pages 31 to 36) is in accordance with the updated Turnbull guidance (Internal Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code) published in October 2005. The process has been in place throughout the accounting period and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and financial statements.

Group management has responsibility for major strategic development and financing decisions. Responsibility for operational issues is devolved, subject to limits of authority, to product group and operating company management. Management at all levels is responsible for internal control over the business functions that have been delegated. This embedding of the system of internal control throughout the Group’s operations ensures that the organisation is capable of responding quickly to evolving business risks and that significant internal control issues, should they arise, are reported promptly to appropriate levels of management.

During the year, the Board and Audit Committee received, on a regular basis, reports from management on the key risks to the business and the steps being taken to manage such risks and considered whether the significant risks faced by the Group were being identified, evaluated and appropriately managed, having regard to the balance of risk, cost and opportunity. In addition, the Audit Committee met with internal auditors on a regular basis and satisfied itself as to the adequacy of the Group’s internal control system, met with the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee to ensure that the Group’s remuneration policies and structures were in line with the Group’s “risk appetite” (which the Board has determined to be low) and reviewed the principal risks and uncertainties outlined on pages 31 to 36. The Audit Committee also met with, and received reports from, the external auditors. The Chairman of the Audit Committee reported regularly to the Board on all significant issues considered by the Committee and the minutes of its meetings were circulated to all Directors.

The Directors confirm that, in addition to the monitoring carried out by the Audit Committee under its terms of reference, they have reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems up to and including the date of approval of the financial statements. This had regard to all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls, that could affect the Group’s business.

1In accordance with Section 91(6)(b) of the EC (Directive 2006/43) Regulations 2010.

82    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

Going Concern

The Company’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Chief Executive’sStrategy Review section on pages 3834 to 40.43. The financial position of the Company, its cash flows, liquidity position

and borrowing facilities are described in the FinanceBusiness Performance Review on pages 4166 to 44.76. In addition, notes 2120 to 2524 to the financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements include the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit, currency and liquidity risks.

The Company has considerable financial resources and a large number of customers and suppliers across different geographic areas and industries. In addition, the local nature of building materials means that the Group’s products are not usually shipped cross-border.

Having assessed the relevant business risks, the Directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage these risks successfully, and they have a reasonable expectation that the Company, and the Group as a whole, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Compliance Statement

In the period under review, CRH complied with the provisions of the 2010 UK Corporate Governance Code (the “2010 Code”). The Company also complied with the rules issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, in so far as they apply to the Group.

Although non-USNon-US companies such as CRH are exempt from most of the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, inNYSE. In common with companies listed on the Irish Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, CRH’s corporate governance practices reflect, inter alia, compliance with (a) domestic company law; (b) the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority and the Irish Stock Exchange; and (c) the 2010 Code, which is appended to the listing rules of the London and Irish Stock Exchanges.

CRH has adopted a robust set of boardBoard governance principles, which reflect the 2010 Code and its principles-based approach

to corporate governance. As such,Accordingly, the way in which CRH makes determinations of directors’Directors’ independence differs from the NYSE rules. The Board has determined that, in its judgement, all of the Non-executivenon-executive Directors are independent. In doing so, however, the boardBoard did not explicitly take into consideration the independence requirements outlined in the NYSE’s listing standards.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

The NYSE rules require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. CRH complies with Irish requirements, which are similar to the NYSE rules. The CRH Board, however, does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSE’s detailed definition ofon what are considered “material revisions”.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) as of 31 December 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Finance Director have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date at the level of providing reasonable assurance.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Finance Director, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

 

The following are available on the CRH website, www.crh.com:

Table 13

Corporate Governance section:

–      Terms of Reference ofAcquisitions Committee (amended December 2010)

–      Terms of Reference ofAudit Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofFinance Committee (amended February 2004)

–      Terms of Reference ofNomination & Corporate Governance Committee (amended December 2013)

–      Terms of Reference ofRemuneration Committee (amended December 2013)

–      The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company

–      Pre-approval policy for non-audit services provided by the auditors

–      Compliance & Ethics statement, Code of Business Conduct and Hotline contact numbers

–      The 2014 Remuneration Policy

Investors section:

–      Annual and Interim Reports, the Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interim Management Statements and copies of presentations to analysts and investors

–      News releases

–      Webcast recordings of key investor briefings

–      General Meeting dates, notices, shareholder circulars, presentations and poll results

–      Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, including questions regarding dividends and shareholder rights in respect of general meetings

 

CRH    83LOGO


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Corporate Governance

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In accordance with the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, the following report is provided by management in respect of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

1)
CRH        107


Pertain

The Remuneration Committee consists of four non-executive Directors considered by the Board to be independent. They bring a range of experience of large organisations and public companies, including experience in the area of senior executive remuneration, to enable the Committee to fulfil its role. Their biographical details are set out on pages 87 to 89.

The main focus of the Committee is to:

–  determine and agree with the Board the Group’s policy on executive remuneration;

–  seek shareholder approval for the policy at least every three years;

–  ensure that CRH’s remuneration structures are fair and responsible; and

–  consider and approve remuneration packages for the executive Directors and the Chairman.

In addition, the Committee:

–  recommends and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for senior management; and

–  oversees the preparation of this Directors’ Remuneration Report.

In considering remuneration levels for executive Directors particularly, the Committee takes into account remuneration trends across the CRH Group, which has a diverse range of operations in 34 countries, in geographic regions which are often at different stages in the economic cycle.

Additional details in relation to the maintenance of records thatCommittee, its role and responsibilities and how it operates are included in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositionsRemuneration Committee section of the assetsCorporate Governance report on page 104.

The Chief Executive attends meetings except when his own remuneration is being discussed.

Directors’ Remuneration Report

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

108        CRH


Introduction

LOGO

On behalf of the Company;Remuneration Committee, I am pleased to introduce the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2014. The Remuneration Report (excluding the Remuneration Policy summary on pages 126 to 131), will be included on the agenda of the 2015 Annual General Meeting for shareholder consideration.

The purpose of CRH’s Remuneration Policy, which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, is to provide an appropriate framework to support the creation of value for shareholders over the longer term, the attraction and retention of key executives and succession planning, without paying more than is necessary. The full Remuneration Policy is available on the CRH website, www.crh.com.

2014 Performance

2014 was a year of growth and progress in terms of our aim of restoring margins and returns to peak levels in the coming years.

Recent Remuneration Snapshot:

•  Updated Remuneration Policy approved at 2014 AGM

•  New performance share plan adopted at 2014 AGM

•  Incentive payout levels linked to stretching performance criteria

•  Strong support from shareholders for policy and implementation

In addition, there was significant achievement regarding the Group’s multi-year divestment programme of €1.5 billion to €2.0 billion, with proceeds from disposals completed in 2014 of €0.35 billion since the programme was announced in August 2014.

Overall, CRH’s strong balance sheet and cash generation capability leave the Company well positioned to take advantage of value-creating acquisition opportunities.

In the context of the Group’s performance in 2014, and performance against individual and strategic goals, theRemuneration Committee has determined that the annual bonus levels for 2014 should be set at the maximum level of 150% for each of the executive Directors.

In accordance with CRH’s Remuneration Policy, approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting, 25% of the 2014 bonus will be deferred into shares for a period of three years.

The basis for each bonus award is set out in detail on page 112. In line with evolving best practice, we have increased the level of disclosure in relation to payout levels to provide shareholders with a greater level of insight into the approach for determining bonus payments. We have also disclosed the targets for the bonus payments in respect of 2013 as these are no longer considered to be commercially sensitive. Similarly, theRemuneration Committee intends that the targets for the 2014 bonus plan will be disclosed in the 2015 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The 2014 Remuneration Policy also made provision for theRemuneration Committee to introduce clawback provisions, in addition to the malus2 provisions already in place for the annual bonus plan and the long-term performance share plan. The Committee has decided, in accordance with the provisions of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code, to introduce clawback provisions for the cash element of the annual bonus plan for 2015 and onwards.

The long-term awards made under the 2006 Performance Share Plan and the 2010 Share Option Scheme made in 2012 (each with a three year performance period 2012 - 2014) did not meet the relevant performance criteria required to vest and, consequently, those awards lapse in full. Further details are set out on pages 114 and 115.

Executive Director Salaries

As reported in the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report, following consideration of the scope of the Finance Director’s responsibilities and her performance since being appointed in 2010, the Committee decided that Maeve Carton’s salary should be increased, subject to continued

  Sales

+ 5% Return on Net Assets

      +150bps

  EBITDA (as defined)*

+11% Operating Cash  Flow

      +23%

  EPS

+33%1Net Debt

      -16%

 

2)*Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recordedDefined as necessary to permit preparationearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the Company; andequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

3)1Provide reasonable assurance regarding preventionBased on adjusted 2013 EPS (excluding impairments and the related tax impact).

2Malus is a mechanism whereby the Remuneration Committee may decide not to release deferred share or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could haveperformance share plan awards if an unusual event such as a material effect onfinancial misstatement occurred, significant losses were incurred or the Consolidated Financial Statements.Company suffered significant reputational damage.

LOGO

CRH      109

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations however, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, the effectiveness of an internal control system may change over time.


LOGO

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission.

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company has elected to exclude an assessment of the internal controls of acquisitions made during the year 2011. These acquisitions, which are listed in note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, constituted 3.1% of total assets and 5.5% of net assets, as of 31 December 2011 and 0.9% and 1.3% of revenue and profit for the financial year, respectively, for the year then ended.

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this assessment, management has concluded and hereby reports that as of 31 December 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our auditors, Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, who have audited the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011, have audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Their report, on which an unqualified opinion is expressed thereon, is included on page 99.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During 2011, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 that occurred during the period covered by this AnnualDirectors’ Remuneration Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.|continued

 

84    CRH


Directorsindividual and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Report on Directors’ Remuneration

business performance, to €675,000 in two steps. Her salary increased to €625,000 (+9.7%) in 2014. TheRemuneration Committee has determined that it is appropriate to make the second increase (to €675,000) in respect of 2015 (+8%).

The Remuneration Committee has also reviewed the salary levels for Albert Manifold and Mark Towe and determined that increases of 7.5% to €1,290,000 and 3% to US$1,420,000 respectively are appropriate. The increase for Albert Manifold reflects the Board consists of independent non-executive Directors of the Company. Under its terms of reference,speed with which are available on the CRH websitewww.crh.com, the Remuneration Committee is responsible for determining the Group’s policy on executive remuneration and considering and approving salaries and other terms of the remuneration packages for the executive Directors. The Remuneration Committee also recommends and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for senior management. It receives advice from leading independent firms of compensation and benefit consultants, when necessary, and the Chairman andhe has developed in the Chief Executive attend meetings exceptrole, demonstrated by the progress in the delivery of strategy and the improvement in returns and margins referred to above. TheRemuneration Committee also noted that the salary of Albert Manifold remains below the level of €1,450,000 awarded to the Chief Executive of CRH in 2008. The increase for Mark Towe is in line with increases across the general employee population in the United States.

2015 Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan

Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan in 2015 will be made at the same level as in 2014 and will continue to be based on TSR and adjusted cash flow. The adjusted cash flow targets have not yet been set by theRemuneration Committee and will be set when their own remuneration is being discussed. Further details regarding the membersoutcome of the Remuneration Committee, including their lengthproposed acquisition of serviceassets from Lafarge S.A. and biographies are set out on pages 68Holcim Ltd is known. As in previous years, the targets will be demanding and aligned to 70.value creation for shareholders, with significant stretch ensuring that only exceptional performance will result in maximum payout.

Remuneration Policy

As referred to in the Chairman’s introduction to the Annual Report on page 2, CRH is an international grouphas entered into a binding commitment to acquire certain assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd for a total enterprise value of companies, with activities in 36 countries. CRH’s€6.5 billion. In the context of this proposed acquisition, the Committee will review the remuneration policy on Directors’ remuneration is designedduring the

course of 2015 to attract and retain Directorsensure it remains appropriate for the needs of the highest calibre who can bring their experience and independent views to the policy, strategic decisions and governance of CRH.business.

Executive Directors must be properly rewarded and motivated to performConclusion

Shareholders play a crucial role in the long-term interestdesign of appropriate, balanced and fair remuneration structures and, as I will retire from the shareholders. Board of CRH following the 2015 Annual General Meeting, I would like to thank all those who have engaged with CRH during my tenure asRemuneration Committee Chairman, for their constructive approach to dialogue with the Company. I have no doubt that my successor, Don McGovern, will benefit from your continued strong support for CRH.

Dan O’Connor

Remuneration Committee Chairman

110      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Annual Statement on Remuneration

The spread of the Group’s operations requires that the remuneration packages in place in each geographical area are appropriate and competitive for that area. In setting remuneration levels,following section sets out details of:

the remuneration paid to Directors in respect of 2014;

how CRH’s remuneration policy will operate for 2015; and

other areas of disclosure.

The Directors’ Remuneration Report, excluding the Remuneration Committee takes into consideration the remuneration practices of other international companies of similar size and scope, trends in executive remuneration generally, in each of the regions in which the Company operates, and the EU Commission’s recommendationsPolicy summary on remuneration in listed companies. Extensive reviews of the structure of executive remuneration were carried out in 2005 and in 2009.

The EU Commission’s recommendations were published in December 2004 in a document entitled “fostering an appropriate regime for the remuneration of the directors of listed companies” and those recommendations were supplemented by additional recommendations issued in 2009. The Remuneration Committee supports the general objectives of the EU’s recommendations and the broad issues they aimpages 126 to address. This is reflected in the detailed disclosures in this Report and in the Corporate Governance Report in relation131, will be

put to the composition of the Remuneration Committee, the Group’s remuneration policy, the elements of executive Directors’ remuneration (including bonus structure, deferred bonus arrangements and share incentive plans), the collective and individual remuneration of Directors and pension entitlements. The Company believes that shareholders are entitled to have a “say on pay” and, accordingly, the Report on Directors’ Remuneration is presented to shareholders each year for the purposes of an advisory vote. In 2011, 96.4%vote at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 7 May 2015.

The Company is not seeking shareholder approval for a revised Remuneration Policy this year and, therefore, we have not included the full policy in this report. We have, however, included the executive Director and non-executive Director policy tables, as well as details of the votes on this resolution were castChief Executive’s service contract as information for shareholders.

Executive Directors

Remuneration received by executive Directors in favour. A numberrespect of the EU Commission’s recommendations, some2014

Details of which are the subject of ongoing consideration at government level and in investment associations, have not been implemented by the Remuneration Committee. Those areas will continue to receive the Remuneration Committee’s active consideration and their relevance and practicality in the business context in which CRH operates will be assessed on an ongoing basis.

Performance-related rewards, based on measured targets, are a key component of remuneration. CRH’s strategy of fostering entrepreneurship in its regional companies requires well-designed incentive plans that reward the creation of shareholder value through organic and acquisitive growth. The typical elements of theindividual remuneration package for executive Directors are basic salary and benefits, a performance-related incentive plan, pension arrangements and participation in the performance share and share option plans. It is policy to grant participation in these plans to key management to encourage identification with shareholders’ interests and to create a community of interest among different regions and nationalities. The Chairman of the Remuneration Committee meets with the Audit Committee annually to review the Group’s remuneration structures and ensure they are in line with its risk policies and systems.

CRH    85


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

The Group also operates share participation plans and savings-related share option schemes for eligible employees in all regions where the regulations permit the operation of such plans. In total there are approximately 6,750 employees of all categories who are shareholders in the Group.

Executive Directors’ Remuneration

Basic salary and benefits

The basic salaries of executive Directors are reviewed annually having regard to personal performance, company performance, step changes in responsibilities and competitive market practice in the area of operation. Employment-related benefits relate principally to relocation costs, the use of company cars and medical/life assurance. No fees are payable to executive Directors.

Performance-related incentive plan

The performance-related incentive plan is totally based on achieving clearly defined and stretch annual profit targets and strategic goals with an approximate weighting of 80% for profits and cash flow generation and 20% for personal and strategic goals. At target performance, payout is 80% of basic salary for Europe-based participants and 90% of basic salary for US-based participants. A maximum payout of 1.5 times these levels is payable for a level of performance well in excess of target.

The four components of the plan are:

(i)Individual performance

(ii)Profit before tax and earnings per share growth targets

(iii)Cash flow generation targets

(iv)Return on net assets targets

Up to one-third of the bonus in each year is payable in CRH shares and the entitlement to beneficial ownership of the shares is deferred for a period of three years (the Deferred Shares), with the individual not becoming beneficially entitled to the Deferred Shares in the event of departure from the Group in certain circumstances during that time period. Deferred Shares are awarded in respect of the portion of any bonus payout that exceeds target performance. The principal objective of the deferral element is to tie a portion of the annual award to the longer-term performance of the CRH share price. In 2011, the Remuneration Committee authorised the release of the Deferred Shares awarded to Mr. Lee in 2008.

In addition to the annual performance incentive plan, the Chief Executive, Mr. Lee, has a special long-term incentive plan (LTIP) incorporating targets set for the five-year period 2009-2013. The plan, the structure of which is the same as for LTIPs putyear ended 31 December 2014, including explanatory notes, are given in place for previous CRH chief executives, incorporates challenging goals in respect of Total Shareholder Return by comparison with a peer group, growth in earnings per share and the strategic development of the Group, with a total maximum earnings potential of 40% of aggregate basic salary. While accruals are made on an annual basis, there is no commitment to any payment until the end of the period. Any payments under the plan will not be pensionable. Details of the manner in which the earnings are provided for under the plan are set out in note 2 to the table of Directors’ remuneration on page 91.

Performance Share Plan/Share Option Scheme

Long-term incentive plans involving conditional awards of shares are a common part of executive remuneration packages, motivating high performance and aligning the interests of executives and shareholders. The Performance Share Plan approved by shareholders in May 2006 is tied to Total Shareholder Return (TSR). Half of the award is assessed against TSR for a group of global building materials companies and the other half against TSR for the constituents of the Eurofirst 300 Index.

86    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

The maximum award under the Performance Share Plan is 150% of basic salary per annum in the form of conditional shares and the vesting period is three years. The awards lapse, if over the three-year period, CRH’s TSR is below the median of the peer group/index; 30% of the award vests if CRH’s performance is equal to the median while 100% vests if CRH’s performance is equal to or greater than the 75th percentile; for TSR performance between the 50th and the 75th percentiles, between 30% and 100% of the award vests on a straight-line basis.

When approved by shareholders in 2006, the Performance Share Plan incorporated an earnings per share (EPS) growth underpin of the Irish Consumer Price Index plus 5% per annum, a requirement of the Irish Association of Investment Managers (IAIM) at the time. The circular issued in 2006 in connection with the proposed adoption of the Performance Share Plan advised shareholders that the “Committee may modify the EPS performance condition if, following agreement with the Irish Association of Investment Managers, it is satisfied that there are valid reasons to do so or where such requirement has ceased to be a requirement of the Irish Association of Investment Managers”. In 2009, the IAIM advised that it did not regard this financial test as an additional hurdle but rather as a mechanism to assist the Remuneration Committee in determining whether TSR reflected performance. Following discussion with the IAIM, the rules of the PSP were amended to delete the underpin requirement, substituting in its place the condition that no award, or portion of an award, which had satisfied the TSR performance criteria would be released unless the Remuneration Committee had confirmed the validity of the TSR performance and reviewed EPS performance to assess its consistency with the objectives of the assessment.

During 2011, the Remuneration Committee determined that 46.21% of the award made under the Performance Share Plan in 2008 had vested. The Company’s TSR performance, which was verified by the Remuneration Committee’s remuneration consultants, was between the 50th and the 75th percentiles referred to above when assessed against the building materials sector, while TSR performance was below the median in relation to the Eurofirst 300 Index. Prior to making its vesting determination in each case, the Remuneration Committee satisfied itself that the TSR outcome was valid and had not been significantly affected by unusual events or extraneous factors.

The peer group against which the Performance Share Plan was measured for the 2008 award was:

Boral

Grafton GroupKingspan GroupTitan Cement

Buzzi Unicem

Heidelberg CementLafargeTravis Perkins

Cemex

Holcim

Martin Marietta

Materials

Vulcan Materials

Ciments Francais

Home Depot

Wienerberger

Cimpor

ItalcementiSaint GobainWolseley

Participants in the Plan are not entitled to any dividends (or other distributions made) and have no right to vote in respect of the shares subject to the award, until such time as the shares vest. Details of awards to Directors under the Plan are provided on page 94.

2010 Share Option Scheme

At the 2010 Annual General Meeting, shareholders approved the introduction of the current share option scheme (the 2010 Scheme) by a vote of 97.5% to 2.5%. Options are granted annually, ensuring a smooth progression over the life of the scheme, at the market price of the Company’s shares at the time of grant. To ensure transparency, grants are made after the final results announcement. The Scheme currently has approximately 650 active participants, over 50% of whom are US employees.

It was indicated in the circular to shareholders in connection with the introduction of the 2010 Scheme that, for the most senior executives in the Group, the combination of awards under CRH’s share incentive plans would be biased towards the TSR-based Performance Share Plan. Awards in 2010 and 2011 were made

CRH    87


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

on this basis and it is intended to maintain this approach. The maximum allocation to any executive under the 2010 Scheme was 150% of basic salary; the maximum allowable under the rules is 200% of salary (including bonus and benefits-in-kind).

The 2010 Scheme is based on one tier of options with a single vesting test. The performance criteria for the scheme are EPS-based. Vesting only occurs once an initial performance target has been reached and, thereafter, is dependant on performance. In considering the level of vesting based on EPS performance, the Remuneration Committee also considers the overall results of the Group. Performance targets for the initial grant of options were agreed with the IAIM, which also approved the Scheme, and were as follows:

the option award lapses if EPS growth over the three year target period is less than 12.5% compounded over the period;

20% of the option grant shall be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 12.5%, while 100% shall be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 27.5%;

subject to any reduction which the Remuneration Committee deems appropriate, options vest between 20% and 40% on a straight line basis if compound growth is between 12.5% and 17.5%; and vest between 40% and 100% on a straight line basis if compound growth is between 17.5% and 27.5%, which provides for proportionately more vesting for higher levels of EPS growth.

The above criteria were also applied for the second grant of options under the scheme in 2011. In setting the criteria in March 2010, the Remuneration Committee took into account the steep fall in CRH EPS arising from the global financial crisis and also an expected rebound in economic growth in CRH’s primary markets. Events over the past two years have led to a much weaker economic recovery and in retrospect these targets have proved much too demanding. As a result, the incentive element in the Scheme has been severely eroded.

Accordingly, the Committee has reviewed the performance criteria in the light of the current economic circumstances and trading backdrop and, with the approval of the IAIM, has adjusted the targets to apply for the option grant in April 2012, as follows:

the option lapses if EPS growth over the three year target period is less than 10% compounded over the period;

20% of the option grant shall be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 10% while 100% shall be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 20%;

subject to any reduction which the Remuneration Committee deems appropriate, options vest between 20% and 40% on a straight line basis if compound growth is between 10% and 13%; and vest between 40% and 100% on a straight line basis if compound growth is between 13% and 20%, which provides for proportionately more vesting for higher levels of EPS growth.

The targets that applied to the 2010 and 2011 option grants remain in place.

The Chairman of the Remuneration Committee has written to major shareholders regarding the change, the rationale therefor and the consultation process with the IAIM.

The Remuneration Committee will review the targets for future grants in 2013 and subsequent years in the light of economic and industry developments.

The Remuneration Committee has discretionary powers regarding the implementation of the rules of the 2010 Scheme. These powers have not been exercised since the adoption of the Scheme. A summary of the principal features of the 2010 Scheme was included in the circular sent to all shareholders, with the Notice of the 2010 Annual General Meeting. The circular is available on the CRH website,www.crh.com. Under the rules of the 2010 Scheme, the Committee has discretion to introduce “clawback” provisions on a retrospective basis for options granted, if such provisions are required by law or any applicable code of corporate governance.

88    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

The percentage of share capital which can be issued under CRH share schemes, and individual share participation limits, comply with institutional guidelines.

Non-executive Directors’ Remuneration

The remuneration of non-executive Directors, including that of the Chairman, is determined by the Board of Directors as a whole. In determining the remuneration, the Board receives recommendations from the Remuneration Committee in respect of the Chairman and in respect of the non-executive Directors from a committee of the Chairman and the executive Directors. Remuneration is set at a level which will attract individuals with the necessary experience and ability to make a substantial contribution to the Company’s affairs and reflect the time and travel demands of their Board duties. They do not participate in any of the Company’s performance-related incentive plans or share schemes.

Pensions

Ms. Carton, Mr. Lee and Mr. Manifold are participants in a contributory defined benefit plan which is based on an accrual rate of 1/60th of pensionable salary for each year of pensionable service and is designed to provide two-thirds of salary at retirement for full service. There is provision for Ms. Carton, Mr. Lee and Mr. Manifold to retire at 60 years of age.

The Finance Act 2006 established a cap on pension provision by introducing a penalty tax charge on pension assets in excess of the higher of5 million (in the Finance Act 2011, this threshold was reduced to2.3 million) or the value of individual accrued pension entitlements as at 7 December 2005. As a result of these legislative changes, the Remuneration Committee decided that Ms. Carton, Mr. Lee and Mr. Manifold should have the option of continuing to accrue pension benefits as previously, or of choosing an alternative arrangement - by accepting pension benefits limited by the cap - with a similar overall cost to Group. They have chosen to opt for the alternative arrangement which involves capping their pensions in line with the provisions of the Finance Act 2006 and receiving a supplementary taxable non-pensionable cash allowance in lieu of pension benefits foregone. These allowances are similar in value to the reduction in the Company’s liability represented by the pension benefits foregone. They are calculated based on actuarial advice as the equivalent of the reduction in the Company’s liability to each individual and spread over the term to retirement as annual compensation allowances. The allowances for 2011 are detailed in note (iii) on page 92.

Mr. Towe participates in a defined contribution retirement plan in respect of basic salary; and in addition participates in an unfunded defined contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) also in respect of basic salary, to which contributions are made at an agreed rate, offset by contributions made to the other retirement plan.

Since 1991, it has been the Board’s policy that non-executive Directors do not receive pensions.

Directors’ Service Contracts

No executive Director has a service contract, has a notice period in excess of 12 months, or is entitled to any benefits on termination of employment.

Directors’ Remuneration and Interests in Share Capital

18 below. Details of Directors’ remuneration charged against profit in the year are given in the table 49 on page 91. Details of individual remuneration and pension benefits for125 in the year ended 31 December 2011 are given on page 92. Directors’ share options are shown on pages 94 and 95; Directors’ shareholdings are shown on page 90.Other Disclosuressection.

 

CRH    89


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Directors’ interests in share capital

The interests of the Directors and Secretary in the shares of the Company, which are beneficial unless otherwise indicated, are shown below. The Directors and Secretary have no beneficial interests in any of the Group’s subsidiary, joint venture or associated undertakings. The Company’s Register of Directors’ Interests contains full details of Directors’ shareholdings and options to subscribe for shares.

Ordinary Shares  23 March
2012
   31 December
2011
   31 December
2010
 

Directors

               

E.J. Bärtschi

   2,000     2,000     -

M. Carton

   45,471     42,343     38,521  

W.P. Egan

   16,112     16,112     16,427  

- Non-beneficial

   12,000     12,000     12,000  

U-H. Felcht

   1,285     1,285     1,285  

N. Hartery

   1,302     1,302     1,285  

J.M. de Jong

   14,672     14,672     14,036  

J.W. Kennedy

   1,009     1,009     1,009  

M. Lee

   384,828     372,401     348,340  

K. McGowan

   22,744     22,744     22,001  

A. Manifold

   33,706     29,215     21,525  

D.N. O’Connor

   15,883     15,883     15,328  

M.S. Towe

   68,028     55,405     44,644  
                

Secretary

               

N. Colgan

   10,723     9,174     11,348  
    629,763     595,545     547,749  

 

Individual remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2014 (Audited)

 

  

 

 

 

 

Table 18

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  Annual Bonus Plan  

 

  

 

 

 

Retirement

 

  

 Basic Salary   Cash   Deferred   Long-Term   Benefits  
 and Fees   Benefits   Element   Shares   Incentives   Expense   Total   Total   Total  
 (a)   (b)   (c)   (c)   (d)   (e)  
 € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000   € 000  
 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2014

 

  

 

 

 

2013

 

  

 

 

 

2012

 

  

 

    

Executive Directors                           
Maeve Carton 625   16   703   234   -   260   1,838   1,412   921  
Albert Manifold 1,200   39   1,350   450   -   559   3,598   2,088   1,385  
Mark Towe 1,036   59   1,166   389   -   207   2,857   2,965   1,983  
  

 

2,861

 

  

 

 

 

114

 

  

 

 

 

3,219

 

  

 

 

 

1,073

 

  

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

 

 

1,026

 

  

 

 

 

8,293

 

  

 

 

 

6,465

 

  

 

 

 

4,289

 

  

 

*Holding as at date of appointment.

Of the above holdings, the following are held in the form of American Depositary Receipts:

    23 March
2012
   31 December
2011
   31 December
2010
 

W.P. Egan

   15,000     15,000     10,000  

- Non-beneficial

   12,000     12,000     12,000  

M.S. Towe

   3,397     3,397     3,397  

Ms. H.A. McSharry became a Director on 22 February 2012 and her holdings at that date and at 23 March 2012 are set out below.

    23 March
2012
   22 February
2012
 

H.A. McSharry

   3,556     3,556  

90    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Directors’ Remuneration

        2011
000
   2010
000
   2009
000
 
Notes  Executive Directors      
  Basic salary   3,398     3,443     3,384  
  Performance-related incentive plan      
  - cash element   1,559     952     964  
  - deferred shares element   -     -     -  
  Retirement benefits expense   1,727     1,602     1,462  
  Benefits   135     164     397  

1

     6,819     6,161     6,207  

2

  Provision for Chief Executive long-term incentive plan   460     460     460  
  Total executive Directors’ remuneration   7,279     6,621     6,667  
        
  Average number of executive Directors   4.00     4.00     4.00  
  Non-executive Directors      
  Fees   578     635     646  
  Other remuneration   659     667     672  
  Total non-executive Directors’ remuneration   1,237     1,302     1,318  
  Average number of non-executive Directors   8.52     9.34     9.50  
        

3

  Payments to former Directors   47     56     59  
  Total Directors’ remuneration   8,563     7,979     8,044  

Notes to Directors’ remuneration

1See analysis of 2011 remuneration by individual on page 92.
2As

(a)      Basic Salary and Fees: The background to the increase in Maeve Carton’s salary in 2014 is set out on page 86,Pages 109 and 110. When he assumed the role of Chief Executive has a special long-term incentive plan tied toin January 2014, Albert Manifold’s salary was set at broadly the achievement of exceptional growth and key strategic goals forsame level as the five-year period 2009 to 2013 with a total maximum earnings potential of 40% of aggregate basic salary. While accruals are made on an annual basis, there is no commitment to any payment until the end of the five-year period.

3Consulting and other fees paid to a number of former directors.

CRH    91


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Individual remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2011

       Incentive Plan                         
    

Basic
salary
and fees
(i)

000

   

Cash

element

(ii)

000

   

Deferred
shares

(ii)

000

   

Retirement
benefits
expense
(iii)

000

   

Other
remuneration
(iv)

000

   

Benefits
(v)

000

   Total
2011
000
   Total
2010
000
   Total
2009
000
 

Executive Directors

                                             

M. Carton (vi)

   550     255     -     232     -     13     1,050     489     -  

G.A. Culpepper (vi)

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     381     1,087  

M. Lee

   1,150     534     -     980     -     25     2,689     2,443     2,455  

A. Manifold

   800     371     -     335     -     31     1,537     1,385     1,236  

M.S. Towe

   898     399     -     180     -     66     1,543     1,463     1,429  
    3,398     1,559     -     1,727     -     135     6,819     6,161     6,207  

Non-executive Directors

                                             

E. Bärtschi (vii)

   11     -     -     -     4     -     15     -     -  

W.P. Egan

   68     -     -     -     52     -     120     120     120  

U-H. Felcht

   68     -     -     -     37     -     105     105     105  

N. Hartery

   68     -     -     -     56     -     124     121     115  

J.M. de Jong

   68     -     -     -     71     -     139     139     139  

J. W. Kennedy

   68     -     -     -     37     -     105     90     45  

K. McGowan

   68     -     -     -     337     -     405     405     405  

T.V. Neill (viii)

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     36     105  

D.N. O’Connor

   68     -     -     -     22     -     90     90     90  

J.M.C. O’Connor (ix)

   23     -     -     -     8     -     31     90     90  

W.I. O’Mahony

   68     -     -     -     35     -     103     106     104  
    578     -     -     -     659     -     1,237     1,302     1,318  

(i)Basicoutgoing Chief Executive. Mark Towe’s salary and fees Salary levels for Irish-based executive Directors were unchangedincreased in 2011 as were fee levels for non-executive Directors. Mark Towe received a 2011 salary increase in US Dollars which was broadlyUS$ terms by 2% in line with general trends in senior executive remunerationCRH operations in the United States. The Remuneration Committee reviewed salary levels in early 2012 and determined that salary levels for Irish-based

(b)      Benefits: For executive Directors these relate principally to the use of company cars, medical insurance and life assurance and, where relevant, the value of the discount on the grant of options under the Group’s 2010 Savings-related Share Option Scheme (see table 38 on page 119) for more details) and the reimbursement of legal fees in relation to the putting in place of service contracts (see page 129 for non-executive Directors, should remain unchanged for 2012. The Committee agreed a 2012 salary increase for Mark Towe in line with continuing trends in the United States.

(ii)more details).

(c)       Performance-related Incentive PlanAnnual Bonus Plan: Under the executive Directors’ incentive planAnnual Bonus Plan for 2011,2014, a bonus is payable for meeting clearly defined and stretch targets and strategic goals. The structure of the 2011 incentive2014 plan, together with details of the performance against targets and payouts in respect of 2014, is set out on pages 86112 to 114.

(d)      Long-Term Incentives: In February 2015, the Remuneration Committee determined that the award made in 2012 under the 2006 Performance Share Plan would lapse as, over the three-year period 2012-2014, CRH’s TSR performance was below the median of both the peer group and 87.the Eurofirst 300 Index. The 2011 plan payout levelsshare options granted in 2012 under the 2010 Share Option Scheme will also lapse in full as the option failed to meet the necessary EPS performance targets. As a result, no long-term incentive award with a performance period ending in 2014 has vested or will vest. Long-Term Incentive amounts for 2013 reflect progressthe value of vested long-term incentive awards with a three-year performance period ending in 2013. These amounts have been updated to reflect the market value of the shares on strategic goalsthe date of vesting, which for Irish based executives was €21.28 and improved earnings perfor the US based executive was €21.505. In the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report the value of the award was estimated based on the three month average share delivery. For 2011price to 31 December 2013 (see page 92 of the bonus2013 Annual Report on Form 20-F for more details). The structure of the 2006 Performance Share Plan is payable entirelyset out in cash.

(iii)table 31 on page 116. The performance criteria for the 2010 Share Option Scheme are set out in table 32 on page 116.

(e)      Retirement benefits expenseBenefits Expense: The Irish Finance Act 2006 effectively established a cap on pension provision by introducing a penalty tax charge on pension assets in excess of the higher of5 €5 million or the value of individual prospective pension entitlements as at 7 December 2005. This cap was further reduced by the Irish Finance Act 2011 to2.3 €2.3 million as at 7 December 2010.and, by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2013, to €2 million. As a result of these legislative changes, the Remuneration Committee has decided that Executiveexecutive Directors who are members of Irish pension schemes should have the option of continuing to accrue pension benefits as previously, or of choosing an alternative arrangement - by accepting pension benefits limited by the cap - with a similar overall cost to the Group. Myles LeeMaeve Carton and Albert Manifold chose to opt for the alternative arrangement which involvesinvolved capping their pensions in line with the provisions of the Finance Acts and receiving a supplementary taxable non-pensionable cash allowance, in lieu of prospective pension benefits foregone. Prior to 2011, Maeve Carton continued to accrue pension benefits as previously but for 2011 opted for the alternative arrangement and now receives allowances as described above. These allowances are similar in value to the reduction in the Company’s liability represented by the pension benefit foregone. They are calculated based on actuarial advice as the equivalent of the reduction in the Company’s liability to each individual and spread over the term to retirement as annual compensation allowances. For 20112014 the compensation allowances amount to980,000 (2010:980,000) €259,950 (2013: €187,141; 2012: €174,931) for Myles Lee;335,195 (2010:354,081)Maeve Carton and €559,150 (2013: €290,190; 2012: €288,117) for Albert Manifold.

LOGO

CRH      111


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

 

 

2015 Salaries - Executive Directors

 

  Table 19  
 

 

Director

  

 

2014

  

 

2015

  

 

% Change

  
 

Albert Manifold

(Chief Executive)

  1,200,000    1,290.000    +7.5%  
 Maeve Carton
(Finance Director)
  625,000    675,000    +8%  
 Mark Towe
(Chief Executive, Oldcastle, Inc.)
  US$1,377,000    US$1,420,000    +3%  
         

Basic Salary and Benefits

Details of executive Directors’ salaries for 2015 compared with 2014 are set out in table 19 above.

The background to the increases in respect of 2015 are set out in theRemuneration Committee Chairman’s introduction on pages 109 and 110.

Salary level increases for executive Directors since 2009 are shown in table 14 on page 108.

Details in relation to employment-related benefits are set out in note (b) in table 18 on page 111.

Annual Bonus Plan

A summary of the structure of CRH’s Annual Bonus Plan is set out in table 20 below.

2014 Annual Bonus Outcomes

CRH’s Annual Bonus Plan for 2014 was based on a combination of financial targets and personal/strategic goals. The specific weightings for each executive Director are shown in table 21 on page 113. In terms of the relative weighting of the components of the plan, the Committee has increased the focus on returns on net

assets, with a corresponding reduction in the percentage of the plan based on earnings per share to ensure that there is sufficient focus on delivering sustainable growth. Indicative performance for each measure is given in tables 22 and 23 on page 113. Specific targets for the 2014 Annual Bonus Plan have not been disclosed in this report as they are considered by the Board to be commercially sensitive. However, it is intended that Group-related targets for 2014 will be disclosed in the 2015 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Overall, strong performance against the 2014 Annual Bonus Plan metrics resulted in bonus payments of 150% of salary for Albert Manifold, Maeve Carton and Mark Towe. In accordance with the Group’s remuneration policy, 25% of the bonus amount will be deferred into shares for a period of three years. Deferred Shares are not subject to any additional performance conditions during the deferral period.

Similar to 2014, CRH’s Annual Bonus Plan for 2013 was based on a combination of financial targets and

Structure of CRH’s Annual Bonus Plan

 Table 20 

Operation:

80% of awards based on financial measures, such as profits, cash flow and returns

20% of awards based on personal and strategic goals

Performance:

50% of maximum bonus awarded for delivering target performance

Maximum award size of 150% of salary for all executive Directors

Deferral:

25% of all bonus awards deferred into shares for three years

Malus/Clawback:    

Malus provisions for deferred share awards to provide the ability to scale back awards prior to vesting in the event of material misstatement, serious reputational damage or the Company suffering serious losses

In line with the requirements of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code, clawback provisions will apply to the cash element of the Annual Bonus Plan for 2015 awards onwards, for the same events as apply in respect of malus, for a period of three years

personal/strategic goals. Due to commercial sensitivity, specific targets were not disclosed in the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report. TheRemuneration Committee considers that Group-related targets for 2013 have ceased to be commercially sensitive and, accordingly, these are set out in table 24 on page 114. Indicative performance against Oldcastle targets for 2013 is shown in table 25 on page 114; the actual targets have not been disclosed as it is considered that the information remains commercially sensitive. Please see table 11 on page 93 of the 2013 Annual Report on Form 20-F for performance in 2013 against personal/strategic measures.

The 2015 Annual Bonus Plan will be operated broadly in line with the 2014 Annual Bonus Plan. However, in line with the requirements of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code, theRemuneration Committee has decided that, in addition to the malus provisions already in place, clawback provisions for the cash element of the Annual Bonus Plan will apply for 2015 onwards (see pages 116 and 117 for more details).

Share Scheme Awards

A summary of share scheme awards made to executive Directors in 2014 is set out in table 27 on page 115. Details of outstanding performance share awards and share options held by executive Directors are shown in tables 36, 37 and 38 on pages 118 and 119.

In addition to the awards set out in table 27 on page 115, Maeve Carton was granted an option under the Group’s 2010 Savings-related Share Option Scheme. Further details in relation to that award are set out in table 38 on page 119.

Long-Term Incentives

2014 Performance Share Plan

A summary of the structure of CRH’s 2014 Performance Share Plan is set out in table 26 on page 115.

In 2014, shareholders approved the introduction of the 2014 Performance Share Plan (the “2014 PSP”). Following approval by shareholders, awards were made to the executive Directors, details of which are summarised in table 37 on page 118. It is anticipated that awards in 2015 under the 2014 PSP will be on broadly the same basis as those made in 2014.

112      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report | continued

 

 

2014 Annual Bonus - Measures and Weightings

 

 Table 21 
  Albert Manifold  Maeve Carton Mark Towe 
  % of salary  % of salary  % of salary 
 Measure Target     Maximum      Target     Maximum      Target     Maximum     
  
 CRH EPS 18.75% 37.5%  18.75% 37.5%  15.0% 30.0% 
 CRH Cash Flow         
  
       (i) Operating Cash Flow 11.25% 22.5%   11.25% 22.5%   - - 
  
   (ii) Divestments 11.25% 22.5%   11.25% 22.5%   - - 
  
 CRH Return on Net Assets 18.75% 37.5%   18.75% 37.5%   7.5% 15.0% 
  
 Oldcastle* Group PBIT** - -  - -  15.0% 30.0% 
 

Oldcastle Cash Flow

 

         
  
   (i) Operating Cash Flow - -   - -   15.0% 30.0% 
  
   (ii) Divestments - -   - -   7.5% 15.0% 
  
 Personal/Strategic 15.00% 30.0%   15.00% 30.0%   15.0% 30.0% 
  
 Total 75.0% 150.0%   75.0% 150.0%   75.0% 150.0% 
 

*   Oldcastle is the holding company for the Group’s operations in the Americas

**  PBIT is defined as earnings before interest and taxes

 

 

 

 

2014 Annual Bonus - Achievement against targets*

 

  Table 22
         Performance achieved relative to targets      
 Measure  

 

    Threshold**

  

 

Target      

  

 

      Maximum

      Performance

achieved***

  Payout

% of max

  
   
     CRH EPS                                LOGO      78.9c  100%  
 
 CRH Cash Flow                                          
   
   (i) Operating Cash Flow****                                          LOGO        1,477m  100%  
   
   (ii) Divestments                                          LOGO        345m  100%  
   
 CRH Return on Net Assets                                          LOGO        7.4%  100%  
   
 Oldcastle Group PBIT                                LOGO      N/D  100%  
 
 Oldcastle Cash Flow                                        
   
   (i) Operating Cash Flow                                          LOGO        N/D  100%  
   
   (ii) Divestments                                          LOGO        N/D  100%  
 

*       Specific targets have not been disclosed as these are deemed commercially sensitive at this time. Target will be disclosed retrospectively when no longer sensitive.

**     0% of each element is earned at threshold.

***    Oldcastle cash flow targets have not been disclosed as it would result in the disclosure of information which is not generally available and is commercially sensitive.

****  For this purpose, operating cash flow has been defined as reported internally.

 

2014 Annual Bonus - Achievement against Personal/Strategic targets

Table 23
Payout
% of
DirectorsStrong delivery in relation to:Maximum

Albert Manifold        

Effective leadership of the Group’s portfolio review; continued progress in relation to organisational change in particular in Europe; supporting and mentoring the senior executive team; effective and clear managemnt of investor communications and building up the Group’s general communication capability.

    100%

231,954 for Maeve Carton.Carton

Continued build up of finance organisation and expansion of finance roles to support performance management; achievements in relation to succession to ensure a strong pipeline of finance executives; completion of two bond issues in 2014 (including a debut Swiss bond issuance) at the lowest coupons achieved by the Group; continued build up of Group IT security and project management roles.

    100%

Mark Towe

Continued input in to the Group’s talent management process and supporting newly appointed Group Human Resources and Talent Development Director; working closely with the Chief Executive to refine succession planning in the Americas; leading the portfolio review process in the Americas.

    100%

LOGO

CRH      113


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

  2013 Annual Bonus - Achievement against Group targets (Albert Manifold, Maeve Carton and Mark Towe)

    Table 24    

    
  Performance needed for payout at    

  Measure

 

  Threshold

 

  Target

 

  Maximum

 

      Performance    

Achieved

 

  Payout
% of max

 

  CRH EPS

  74c  80c  84c  59.5c*  0.0%

  Operating Cash Flow**

        1,075m              1,240m              1,340m              1,204m                52.0%        

  CRH Return on Net Assets

  6.0%  6.5%  7.0%  5.9%  0.0%

 

  *  Adjusted EPS, excluding the impact of non cash impairment recorded in 2013.

  **For this purpose, operating cash flow has been defined as reported internally.

 

  2013 Annual Bonus - Achievement against Oldcastle targets (Mark Towe)

    Table 25    

(iv)

Performance achieved relative to targets

  Measure

        Threshold**            

        Target        

            Maximum             

Other RemunerationPayout
            % of max             
Includes remuneration for Chairman, Board Committee work

  Oldcastle Group PBIT*

LOGO   93.3%

  Oldcastle Cash Flow

LOGO    92.6%

  Oldcastle Return on Net Assets

LOGO   93.3%

  *  PBIT is defined as earnings before interest and allowances for non-executive Directors based outsidetaxes.

  **0% of Ireland. In the case of Liam O’Mahony payments for services unrelated to Board and Committee work are also included.

(v)Benefits These relate principally to relocation expenses, housing allowance, the use of company cars and medical/life assurance.
(vi)Maeve Carton became a Director on 25 May 2010 while Glenn Culpepper resigned as a Director on the same date and as an executive on 30 June 2010. Maeve Carton’s remuneration for 2010each element is stated from date of appointment while Glenn Culpepper’s remuneration for that year is for the period up to his date of resignation as a Director.
(vii)Ernst Bärtschi became a Director on 26 October 2011.
(viii)Terry Neill retired on 5 May 2010.
(ix)Joyce O’Connor retired on 4 May 2011.earned at threshold.

 

9275% of each award made in 2014 is subject to a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance measure, with performance being measured against sector peers (see table 30 on page 116). The vesting schedule is shown in table 28 on page 116. The Committee believes that, for a cyclical business such as CRH, TSR is the most appropriate performance measure at present and is a key measure of the value generated for shareholders.


The TSR performance measure will be subject to a financial underpin. This means that when determining vesting under the 2014 PSP, the Committee will review whether the TSR performance has been impacted by unusual events and whether it is, therefore, an appropriate reflection of underlying performance. In addition, the Committee will consider EPS performance in the period to ensure that TSR performance was consistent with the objectives of the performance criteria and had not been distorted by extraneous factors.

The remaining 25% of each award is subject to a cumulative cash flow metric. This Group financial measure supports dividend delivery, development activity and, in the context of the Group’s €1.5 - €2.0 billion multi-year divestment programme, provides an emphasis on asset/business disposals. The cash flow

target is based on a cumulative adjusted cash flow figure over three financial years. The definition of cash flow is adjusted to exclude:

dividends to shareholders;

acquisition/investment expenditure;

share issues (scrip dividend, share options, other);

financing cash flows (new loans/ repayments);

back funding pension payments; and

foreign exchange translation.

TheRemuneration Committee considers that it is appropriate to make these adjustments in order to remove items that do not reflect the quality of management’s operational performance, or are largely outside of management control. This is to ensure that management remains incentivised to make decisions which are in the best long-term interests of the business and shareholders.

The cumulative adjusted cash flow target for the award made in 2014 under the 2014 PSP are set out in table 29 on page 116.

The adjusted cash flow target for awards in 2015 under the 2014 PSP have not yet been set by theRemuneration Committee. The target will be set once

the outcome of the proposed acquisition of assets from Lafarge S.A. and Holcim Ltd is known. The targets will be demanding with significant stretch ensuring that only exceptional performance will result in a maximum payout.

Vested awards will be required to be held for a further two years post-vesting.

Directors2006 Performance Share Plan

The 2006 Performance Share Plan (the “2006 PSP”), which was approved by shareholders in May 2006, is tied to TSR over a three year performance period. It has been replaced by the 2014 PSP (see page 112), which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting. Consequently, the last award under the 2006 PSP was made in 2013. Half of each award is assessed against TSR for a group of global building materials companies (see table 30 on page 116) and Corporate Governancethe other half against TSR for the constituents of the Eurofirst 300 Index.

The performance criteria for the 2006 PSP are set out in table 31 on page 116. Participants are not entitled to any dividends (or other distributions made) and have no right to vote in respect of the shares subject to the award, until the shares vest.

The rules of the 2006 PSP provide that no award, or portion of an award, which

114      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report

| continued

 

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE -

  Structure of the 2014 Performance Share Plan

    Table 26    

  Operation:     

–  Conditional share award which vests, subject to performance, over a three year period

–  Awards subject to a two year holding period post vesting

  Performance:

–  75% of awards based on relative TSR performance compared to key peers (see table 30 on page 116)

–  25% of awards based on cumulative cash flow performance (see table 29 on page 116)

–  Maximum award size of 250% of salary for Chief Executive and 200% of salary for other executive Directors

  Malus/Clawback:    

–  Malus provisions provide theRemuneration Committee with the ability to scale back awards up to five years from grant in the event of material misstatement, serious reputational damage or the Company suffering serious losses

has satisfied the TSR performance criteria should be released unless theRemuneration Committee has confirmed the validity of the TSR performance and reviewed EPS performance to assess its consistency with the objectives of the assessment.

In respect of the award made in 2012 (with a performance period 2012-2014), in February 2015, theRemuneration Committee determined that the award would lapse as, over the three-year period 2012 -2014, CRH’s TSR performance was below the median of both the peer group and the Eurofirst Index. The Company’s TSR performance was reviewed by theRemuneration Committee’s remuneration consultants.

During 2014, theRemuneration Committee determined that 49% of the award made under the 2006 PSP in 2011 (with a performance period 2011-2013) had vested. Details of the value of that award are set out in table 18 on page 111. Further details are provided in the 2013 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Details of outstanding awards to Directors under the 2006 PSP are provided in table 36 on page 118. Outstanding awards are subject to the performance conditions outlined above.

2010 Share Option Scheme

At the 2010 Annual General Meeting, shareholders approved the introduction of the Earnings Per Share (EPS) based share option scheme (the “2010 Scheme”). Following the approval by

shareholders for the introduction of the 2014 PSP, no further awards will be made under the 2010 Scheme. Consequently, the last award under the 2010 Scheme was made in 2013.

Options were granted at the market price of the Company’s shares at the time of grant. The vesting period for options is three years, with vesting only occurring once an initial EPS performance target has been reached. Awards under the 2010 Scheme were limited to 150% of salary.

The performance criteria for the 2010 Scheme were agreed with the Irish Association of Investment Managers (the “IAIM”) and are set out in table 32 on page 116. The performance targets were designed to provide for proportionately more vesting for higher levels of EPS growth.

Vesting levels are subject to any reduction which theRemuneration Committee deems appropriate in the context of the overall results of the Group.

The grant of options under the 2010 Scheme made in 2010 and 2011 did not meet the EPS performance criteria set out above and, accordingly, the options lapsed on the third anniversary of the date of grant. Similarly, the grant of options made in 2012, having failed to meet the appropriate EPS criteria, will lapse in full in April 2015.

 

 

 

Pension entitlements - defined benefitLOGO

 

    Summary of Scheme Interests Granted in 2014

 

 

Table 27    

 

    Directors

 

 

Scheme

 

  

Basis of

award    
(% of salary)    

 

  

Number of    
shares    

 

  

Face value*    

 

  

Exercise    
price    

 

  

 

Percentage vesting    

at threshold    

performance    

(% of maximum)    

 

  

 

 

Performance    
period    

end date    

 

 

Expected    

date of    
release     

 

  

 

2014 PSP

              

Albert Manifold     

 

(conditional

shares)

 

  

250%

 

  

142,900

 

   2,928,021

 

  n/a

 

  25%

 

  31-Dec-16

 

   Feb-2019        

 

  

 

2014 PSP

              

Maeve Carton

 

(conditional

shares)

 

  

200%

 

  

59,500

 

   1,219,155

 

  n/a

 

  25%

 

  31-Dec-16

 

   Feb-2019        

 

  

 

2013 Annual

Bonus**

  

5%

 

  

2,561

 

   54,000

 

  n/a

 

  n/a

 

  n/a

 

  Mar-2017        

 

Mark Towe

 

(deferred

shares)

 

                      
                
  

2014 PSP

(conditional

  200%  97,100  1,989,579  n/a  25%  31-Dec-16  Feb-2019        

 

  shares)                      

 

  *  Face value has been calculated using the share price at the date of grant for 2014 PSP awards (€20.49).

 

  ** See table 9 on page 93 of the 2013 Annual Report on Form 20-F for the structure of the 2013 Annual Bonus Plan.

 

 

 

    

Increase in
accrued
personal pension
during 2011

(i)

000

   

Transfer value
of increase in
dependants’
pension

(i)

000

   

Total accrued
personal
pension at
year-end

(ii)

000

 

Executive Directors

               

M. Carton

   -     5     266  

M. Lee

   -     -     287  

A. Manifold

   -     28     273  

 

(i)
CRH      115


Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

LOGO

Details of outstanding awards to Directors under the 2010 Scheme are provided in tables 38 and 39 on page 119.

TheRemuneration Committee has discretionary powers regarding the implementation of the rules of the 2010 Scheme. These powers have not been exercised since the adoption of the 2010 Scheme.

2000 Share Option Scheme

At the Annual General Meeting held in 2000, shareholders approved the introduction of a share option scheme (the “2000 Scheme”). This scheme was superseded by the 2010 Scheme referred to above. No awards have been made under the 2000 Scheme since 2009. Details of outstanding awards and the performance criteria for the 2000 Scheme are set out in tables 38 and 39 on page 119.

Other employee share plans

Maeve Carton and Albert Manifold also participate in the 2010 Savings-related Option Scheme (Republic of Ireland) (the “2010 SAYE”) and in the Group’s Irish Revenue approved Share Participation Scheme (the “Participation Scheme”).

The 2010 SAYE is an Irish Revenue approved plan open to all Irish employees. Participants may save up to €500 a month from their net salaries for a fixed term of three or five years and at the end of the savings period they have the option to buy CRH shares at a discount of up to 15% of the market price on the date of invitation of each savings contract. Details of the outstanding awards of Maeve Carton and Albert Manifold under the 2010 SAYE are set out in tables 38 and 39 on page 119.

The Participation Scheme is open to all employees in Ireland, and grants can be made to participants up to a maximum of €12,700 annually in CRH shares.

Malus and Clawback

From 2015 all incentive awards to executive Directors are subject to recovery provisions. Annual bonus awards will be subject to recovery provisions for three years from the date of payment (cash awards) or grant (deferred awards). Performance Share

2014 Performance Share Plan (2014 PSP) Metrics

3-year TSR* performance compared to peer group
(75% of award)

Vesting Level

    Table 28    

Equal to or greater than 75thpercentile100%
Between 50thand 75thpercentileStraight line between 25% and 100%
Equal to 50thpercentile25%
Below 50thpercentile0%

*  The methodology for calculating TSR assumes all dividends are reinvested on the ex-dividend date at the closing share price on that day; the open and close price is based on the three month average closing price on the last day before the start of the performance period and the final day of the performance period respectively.

Cumulative Cash Flow 2014 - 2016(25% of award)

Vesting Level

    Table 29    

Equal to or greater than3.5bn100%
Between2.9bn -3.5bnStraight line between 25% - 100%
Equal to2.9bn25%
Below2.9bn0%

Peer Group for TSR Performance Metric for awards under the 2014 PSP

and 2006 PSP

    Table 30    

BoralItalcementiTitan CementAdditional company included in the 2006 PSP Peer Group:
Buzzi UnicemKingspan GroupTravis PerkinsHome Depot
CemexLafargeVulcan Materials
Grafton GroupMartin Marietta MaterialsWeinerberger
Heidelberg CementSaint GobainWolseley
Holcim

2006 Performance Share Plan (2006 PSP) Metrics

    Table 31    

3-year TSR* performance compared to

peer group/Eurofirst 300 Index

Vesting Level

Equal to or greater than 75thpercentile100%
Between 50thand 75thpercentileStraight line between 30% and 100%
Equal to 50thpercentile30%
Below 50thpercentile0%

*  The methodology for calculating TSR assumes all dividends are reinvested on the ex-dividend date at the closing share price on that day; the open and close price is based on the closing price on the last day before the start of the performance period and the final day of the performance period respectively.

Share Option Scheme Metrics

    Table 32    

Compound EPS* Growth Performance over three years

Awarded in 2010 & 2011Awarded in 2012 & 2013Vesting Level
Equal to or greater than 27.5% p.a.Equal to or greater than 20% p.a.100%
Between 17.5% and 27.5% p.a.Between 13% and 20% p.a.Straight line between 40% and 100%
Between 12.5% and 17.5% p.a.Between 10% and 13% p.a.Straight line between 20% and 40%
Equal to 12.5% p.a.Equal to 10% p.a.20%
Less than 12.5% p.a.Less than 10% p.a.0%

*  The EPS figure used for the purposes of the 2010 Scheme is the basic consolidated earnings per share of the Company for the accounting period concerned as shown in the Annual Report issued by the Company for that accounting period.

116      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

Plan awards will be subject to malus for the three years prior to performance assessment and the two further years of the holding period.

Malus or clawback provisions may be triggered in the event of:

material misstatement;

serious reputational damage; or

the Company suffering serious losses.

Retirement Benefit Expense

Maeve Carton and Albert Manifold are participants in a contributory defined benefit plan which is based on an accrual rate of 1/60th of salary* for each year of pensionable service and is designed to provide two-thirds of career average salary at retirement for full service. If either Maeve Carton or Albert Manifold leave service prior to Normal Retirement Age (60) they will become entitled to a deferred pension, payable from Normal Retirement Age, based on the pension they have accrued to their date of leaving.

The Finance Act 2006 effectively established a cap on pension provisions by introducing a penalty tax charge on pension assets in excess of the higher of €5 million (in the Finance Act 2011, this threshold was reduced to €2.3 million and reduced further to €2 million by the Finance Act (No. 2) Act 2013) or the value of individual accrued pension entitlements as at 7 December 2005. As a result of these legislative changes, theRemuneration Committee decided that executive Directors should have the option of continuing to accrue pension benefits as previously, or of choosing an alternative arrangement - by accepting pension benefits limited by the cap - with a similar overall cost to the Group. Maeve Carton and Albert Manifold have opted for an arrangement whereby their pensions are capped in line with the provisions of the Finance Acts and receive a supplementary taxable non-pensionable cash supplement in lieu of pension benefits forgone. There was, therefore, no additional accrual in 2014. The cash pension supplements for 2014 are detailed in table 18 on page 111. These supplements are similar in value to the reduction in the Company’s

 

  Pension Entitlements - Defined Benefit (Audited)

 

  

 

 

 

 

    Table 33    

 

 

  

 

 

Increase in

accrued

personal pension

during 2014

(i)

000

 

   

Transfer value

of increase in

dependents’

pension

(i)

  000

 

   

Total accrued

personal

pension at

year-end

(ii)

  000

 

 
  Executive Directors             
  Albert Manifold -     208     273  
  Maeve Carton -     29     266  

(i)    As noted on page 89,111, the pensions of Myles Lee, Albert Manifold and Maeve Carton have been capped in line with the provisions of the Irish Finance Acts. However, dependants’ pensions continue to accrue resulting in Greenbury transfer values which have been calculated on the basis of actuarial advice. These amounts do not represent sums paid out or due, but are the amounts that the pension scheme would transfer to another pension scheme in relation to benefits accrued in 20112014 in the event of these Directors leaving service.

(ii)

The accrued pensions shown are those which would be payable annually from normal retirement date.

Pension entitlements - defined contribution

The accumulated liabilities related to the unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for Mark Towe are as follows:

Pension Entitlements - Defined Contribution (Audited)

Pension Entitlements - Defined Contribution (Audited)

   

 

Table 34

 

 

The accumulated liablilities related to the unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans

for Mark Towe are as follows:

The accumulated liablilities related to the unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans

for Mark Towe are as follows:

  

  

  

As at

31 December
2010

000

   2011
contribution
000
   

2011
notional
interest
(iii)

000

   Translation
adjustment
000
   

As at
31 December
2011

000

   

As at

31 December

2013

€ 000

 

      

2014

contribution

€ 000

 

      

2014

Notional

interest

(iii)

€ 000

 

      

Translation

adjustment

€ 000

 

      

As at

31 December

2014

€ 000

 

 

Executive Director

                                     

M.S. Towe

   1,217     173     63     58     1,511  

Mark Towe

   1,923        194        97        288        2,502  

 

(iii)

Notional interest, which is calculated based on the average bid yields of United States Treasury
fixed-coupon securities with remaining terms to maturity of approximately 20 years, plus 1.5%, is credited to the above plan.plans.

Deferred Shares(iv)

liability represented by the pension benefits foregone. They are calculated based on actuarial advice as the equivalent of the reduction in the Company’s liability to each individual and spread over the term to retirement as annual compensation allowances.

The contributory defined benefit plan in which Albert Manifold and Maeve Carton participate is closed to new entrants.

Mark Towe participates in a defined contribution retirement plan in respect of basic salary; and in addition he participates in an unfunded defined contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) also in respect of basic salary, to which contributions are made at an agreed rate (20%), offset by contributions made to the other retirement plan.

 

    Number at
31 December
2010
   Awards of
Deferred
Shares
during
2011
   New Shares
allotted under
the Scrip
Dividend
Scheme
during 2011
   Released
during
2011
   

Number at

31 December
2011

 

Executive Director

          

M. Lee

   10,449     -     -     10,449     -  

Details regarding pension entitlements for the executive Directors are set out in tables 33 and 34 above.

There is no change to the pension arrangements for 2015.

LOGO

 

(iv)*Salary is defined as basic annual salary and excludes any fluctuating emoluments.

CRH        117


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

Directors’ Interests in Shares and Share Scheme Awards

 

  Deferred Share Awards under the Annual Bonus Plan (i) (Audited)

 

                

 

Table 35

 

 
   

31 December

2013

 

      

Awards in

2014

(ii)

 

      

Alloted under

the scrip dividend

scheme in

2014

 

      

Released in

2014

 

      

31 December

2014

 

      

Release

Date

 

 

  Mark Towe

   -        2,561        65        -        2,626        Feb 2017  

(i)     Under the executive Directors’ incentive plan,Annual Bonus Plan in operation in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2013, up to one thirdone-third of the earned bonus in each year is payablewas receivable in CRH shares, and the entitlement to beneficial ownership of the shares is deferred for a period of three years, with the individual not becoming beneficially entitled to the sharesforfeiture in the event of departure from the Group in certain circumstances during that time periodperiod.

(ii)     The shares awarded during 2014 related to the deferred portion of 2013 bonus and were included in total remuneration reported for 2013. These shares were purchased by the Trustees of the CRH plc Employee Benefit Trust on 26 February 2014 at €20.375 per Ordinary Share.

 

CRH    93


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Directors’ awards under the Performance Share Plan (i)

   31 December
2010
  Granted
in 2011
  Released
in 2011
(ii)
  Lapsed
in 2011
(ii)
  31 December
2011
  Performance
period
  Release
date
  Market
price in euro
on award
 

M. Carton

  4,436    -    2,049    2,387    -    01/01/08 - 31/12/10    March 2011    23.45  
  14,000    -    -    -    14,000    01/01/09 - 31/12/11    March 2012    17.00  
  10,000    -    -    -    10,000    01/01/10 - 31/12/12    March 2013    18.51  
  -    42,000    -    -    42,000    01/01/11 - 31/12/13    March 2014    16.52  
  28,436    42,000    2,049    2,387    66,000     

M. Lee

  27,725    -    12,811    14,914    -    01/01/08 - 31/12/10    March 2011    23.45  
  70,000    -    -    -    70,000    01/01/09 - 31/12/11    March 2012    17.00  
  75,000    -    -    -    75,000    01/01/10 - 31/12/12    March 2013    18.51  
  -    88,000    -    -    88,000    01/01/11 - 31/12/13    March 2014    16.52  
  172,725    88,000    12,811    14,914    233,000     

A. Manifold

  27,725    -    12,811    14,914    -    01/01/08 - 31/12/10    March 2011    23.45  
  47,500    -    -    -    47,500    01/01/09 - 31/12/11    March 2012    17.00  
  55,000    -    -    -    55,000    01/01/10 - 31/12/12    March 2013    18.51  
  -    62,000    -    -    62,000    01/01/11 - 31/12/13    March 2014    16.52  
  130,225    62,000    12,811    14,914    164,500     

M.S. Towe

  23,289    -    10,761    12,528    -    01/01/08 - 31/12/10    March 2011    23.45  
  76,000    -    -    -    76,000    01/01/09 - 31/12/11    March 2012    17.00  
  60,000    -    -    -    60,000    01/01/10 - 31/12/12    March 2013    18.51  
  -    68,000    -    -    68,000    01/01/11 - 31/12/13    March 2014    16.52  
  159,289    68,000    10,761    12,528    204,000     

 

    Directors’ awards under the 2006 Performance Share Plan (i) (Audited)

 

  

    Table 36    

 

   
                              Market   
   31 December   Granted in   Released in   Lapsed in   31 December   Performance   Release  Price in euro   
   

2013

 

   

2014

 

   

2014 (ii)

 

   

2014 (ii)

 

   

2014

 

   

Period

 

   

Date

 

  

on award

 

   

Maeve Carton    

   42,000     -     20,626     21,374     -     01/01/11 - 31/12/13             
   50,000     -     -     -     50,000     01/01/12 - 31/12/14         15.19    
   50,000     -     -     -     50,000     01/01/13 - 31/12/15     February 2016    16.19    
   142,000     -     20,626     21,374     100,000        
                                         

Albert Manifold    

   62,000     -     30,448     31,552     -     01/01/11 - 31/12/13             
   70,000     -     -     -     70,000     01/01/12 - 31/12/14         15.19    
   72,000     -     -     -     72,000     01/01/13 - 31/12/15     February 2016    16.19   
   204,000     -     30,448     31,552     142,000        
                                         

Mark Towe

   68,000     -     33,394     34,606     -     01/01/11 - 31/12/13             
   90,000     -     -     -     90,000     01/01/12 - 31/12/14         15.19    
   90,000     -     -     -     90,000     01/01/13 - 31/12/15     February 2016    16.19   
   248,000     -     33,394     34,606     180,000        

 

(i)

2006 Performance Share PlanPlan: This is a long-term share incentive plan under which share awards are granted in the form of a provisional allocation of shares for which no exercise price is payable. The shares scheduled for release in March 2012, March 2013 and March 2014February 2016 will be allocated to the extent that the relative TSR performance conditions are achieved. The structure of the 2006 Performance Share Plan is set out on pages 86114 and 87.115.

(ii)On 2 March 2011,

(ii)   In 2014, the Remuneration Committee determined that 46.21%49.11% of the 20082011 award vested and that portion of the award was released to participants. The balance of the 20082011 award lapsed. The market value per share for tax purposes on the date of release was €21.28 for Directors resident in Ireland and €21.505 for Directors resident outside Ireland.

 

94    CRH


Directors and Corporate Governance

 

    Directors’ Awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan (i) (Audited)

 

  

    Table 37    

 

   
                                  Market   
   31 December   Granted in   

Dividend

Equivalents

   Released in   Lapsed in   31 December   Performance   Release  Price
in euro
   
   

2013

 

   

2014

 

   

2014 (ii)

 

   

2014

 

   

2014

 

   

2014

 

   

Period

 

   

Date

 

  

on award

 

   

Maeve Carton    

   -     59,500     618     -     -     60,118     01/01/14 - 31/12/16     February 2019    20.49    

Albert Manifold    

   -     142,900     1,484     -     -     144,384     01/01/14 - 31/12/16     February 2019    20.49    

Mark Towe     

   -     97,100     1,008     -     -     98,108     01/01/14 - 31/12/16     February 2019    20.49    

(i)    2014 Performance Share Plan: This is a long-term share incentive plan under which share awards are granted in the form of a provisional allocation of shares for which no exercise price is payable. The shares scheduled for release in February 2019 will be allocated to the extent that the relevant performance conditions are achieved. The structure of the 2014 Performance Share Plan is set out in table 26 on page 115.

(ii)   The Remuneration Committee has determined that dividend equivalents should accrue on awards under the 2014 Performance Share Plan. Subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria, such dividend equivalents will be released to participants in the form of additional shares at vesting.

 

118      CRH

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE -


Directors’ Remuneration Report| continued

 

 

    Directors’ Share Options (Audited)

 

 

Table 38

 

 
    
    Details of movements on outstanding options and those exercised during the year are set out in the table below 

Options exercised during

2014

 
 

31 December
2013

 

 

Granted in
2014

 

 

Lapsed in
2014

 

 

Exercised

in 2014

 

 

31 December
2014

 

6 March

2015

 

 

  

Weighted

average

option price at
31 December
2014

 

 

Weighted
average
exercise
price

 

 

Weighted
average

market
price at date
of exercise

 

 

    Maeve Carton

 55,831   -   -   -  55,83155,831 (a 25.75   -   -  
 13,308   -   13,308   -  -- (b -   -   -  
 139,500   -   42,500   -  97,00097,000 (c 15.67   -   -  
 -   1,726   -   -  1,7261,726 (d 17.67   -   -  

    Albert Manifold

 166,445   -   -   -  166,445149,810 (a 21.97   -   -  
 16,635   -   16,635   -  -- (b -   -   -  
 200,000   -   62,500   -  137,500137,500 (c 15.68   -   -  
 2,236   -   -   -  2,2362,236 (d 13.64   -   -  

    Mark Towe

 155,425   -   -   22,344  133,081105,356 (a 24.38   15.09   21.53  
 49,905   -   49,905   -  -- (b -   -   -  
 245,000   -   70,000   -  175,000175,000 (c 15.68   -   -  
         1,044,285   1,726   254,848   22,344  768,819724,459

    

 

Directors’ share options

Details of movements on outstanding options and those exercised during the year are set out in the table below:

                       Options exercised
during 2011
 
   

31 December
2010

 

  

Granted

in 2011

 

  

Lapsed
in 2011

 

  

Exercised
in 2011

 

  

31 December
2011

 

      

Weighted average
option price at
31 December
2011

  

Weighted
average
exercise
price

  

Weighted
average market
price at date of
exercise

 

M. Carton

  55,831    -    -    -    55,831    (a  25.75    -    -  
   39,924    -    7,763    -    32,161    (b  14.61    -    -  
   35,000    42,500    -    -    77,500    (c  17.29    -    -  
   1,752    -    -    -    1,752    (d  18.39    -    -  

M. Lee

  318,435    -    -    -    318,435    (a  19.32    -    -  
   138,625    -    27,725    -    110,900    (b  14.45    -    -  
   85,000    90,000    -    -    175,000    (c  17.36    -    -  
   1,752    -    -    -    1,752    (d  18.39    -    -  

A. Manifold

  166,445    -    -    -    166,445    (a  21.97    -    -  
   48,796    -    6,654    -    42,142    (b  14.36    -    -  
   60,000    62,500    -    -    122,500    (c  17.36    -    -  
   1,752    -    -    -    1,752    (d  18.39    -    -  

W.I. O’Mahony

  576,680    -    138,625    -    438,055    (a  18.88    -    -  
   277,250    -    166,350    -    110,900    (b  17.75    -    -  

M.S. Towe

  243,981    -    27,725    -    216,256    (a  20.75    -    -  
   155,260    -    27,725    -    127,535    (b  14.44    -    -  
  70,000    70,000    -    -    140,000    (c  17.39    -    -  
  2,276,483    265,000    402,567    -    2,138,916      

CRH    95


Directors and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Directors’ Remuneration

Options by price

 31 December
2010
  Granted
in 2011
  Lapsed
in 2011
  Exercised
in 2011
  31 December
2011
      Earliest
exercise date
  Expiry date 

16.4830

  166,350    -    166,350    -    -    (a        

16.4830

  236,217    -    236,217    -    -    (b        

17.7454

  138,625    -    -    -    138,625    (a  March 2012    April 2012  

17.7454

  182,985    -    -    -    182,985    (b  March 2012    April 2012  

11.8573

  110,900    -    -    -    110,900    (a  March 2012    April 2013  

11.8573

  72,085    -    -    -    72,085    (b  March 2012    April 2013  

11.9565

  27,725    -    -    -    27,725    (a  March 2012    April 2013  

11.9565

  49,905    -    -    -    49,905    (b  March 2012    April 2013  

15.0674

  66,540    -    -    -    66,540    (a  March 2012    April 2014  

15.0674

  68,758    -    -    -    68,758    (b      April 2014  

15.0854

  27,725    -    -    -    27,725    (a  March 2012    April 2014  

15.0854

  49,905    -    -    -    49,905    (b      April 2014  

18.7463

  72,085    -    -    -    72,085    (a  March 2012    April 2015  

18.8545

  27,725    -    -    -    27,725    (a  March 2012    April 2015  

26.1493

  105,355    -    -    -    105,355    (a      April 2016  

22.3892

  221,800    -    -    -    221,800    (a      June 2016  

29.4855

  86,502    -    -    -    86,502    (a      April 2017  

29.8643

  36,043    -    -    -    36,043    (a      April 2017  

21.5235

  143,997    -    -    -    143,997    (a      April 2018  

16.58

  130,000    -    -    -    130,000    (a      April 2019  

18.39

  250,000    -    -    -    250,000    (c      May 2020  

16.38

  -    265,000    -    -    265,000    (c      April 2021  

18.3946

  5,256    -    -    -    5,256    (d  July 2013    December 2013  
  2,276,483    265,000    402,567    -    2,138,916     

The market price of the Company’s shares at 31 December 2011 was15.36 and the range during 2011 was10.50 to17.00.
 

 

Option by price (Audited)

 

   Table 39 
  31 December Granted Lapsed Exercised 31 December   Earliest   
 

 

2013

 

 

in 2014

 

 

in 2014

 

 

in 2014

 

 

2014

 

   

exercise date

 

 

Expiry date

 

 
                        

15.0674

 29,943   -   29,943   -  - (b       

15.0854

 22,344   -   -   22,344  - (a       

15.0854

 49,905   -   49,905   -  - (b       

18.7463

 16,635   -   -   -  16,635 (a  February 2015   April 2015  

18.8545

 27,725   -   -   -  27,725 (a  February 2015   April 2015  

    

26.1493

 72,085   -   -   -  72,085 (a     April 2016  

29.4855

 53,232   -   -   -  53,232 (a     April 2017  

29.8643

 36,043   -   -   -  36,043 (a     April 2017  

21.5235

 99,637   -   -   -  99,637 (a     April 2018  

16.58

 50,000   -   -   -  50,000 (a     April 2019  

16.38

 175,000   -   175,000   -  - (c       

15.19

 210,000   -   -   -  210,000 (c     April 2022  

16.19

 199,500   -   -   -  199,500 (c     April 2023  

13.64

 2,236   -   -   -  2,236 (d  August 2017   January 2018  

17.67

 -   1,726   -   -  1,726 (d August 2019   January 2020  
         1,044,285   1,726   254,848   22,344  768,819

The market price of the Company’s shares at 31 December 2014 was €19.90 and the range during 2014 was €15.86 to €21.82.

 

(a)

Granted under the 2000 share option scheme, these options are only exercisable when EPS growth exceeds the growth of the Irish Consumer Price Index by 5% compounded over a period of at least three years subsequent to the granting of the options.

(b)

Granted under the 2000 share option scheme, these options are only exercisable if, over a period of at least five years subsequent to the granting of the options, the growth in EPS exceeds the growth of the Irish Consumer Price Index by 10% compounded and places the Company in the top 25% of EPS performance of a peer group of international building materials and other manufacturing companies. If below the 75th 75thpercentile, these options are not exercisable.

(c)

Granted under the 2010 share option scheme. Vesting will only occur once an initial performance target has been reached and, thereafter, will be dependent on performance. The option will lapse if EPS growth over the three year target period is less than 12.5% compounded over the period. 20% of the option will be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 12.5%, while 100% will be exercisable if compound EPS growth is equal to 27.5%. Subject to any reduction which the Remuneration Committee deems appropriate, options will vest between 20% and 40%performance criteria are set out in table 32 on a straight-line basis if compound growth is between 12.5% and 17.5%; and vest between 40% and 100% on a straight-line basis if compound growth is between 17.5% and 27.5%.
page 116.

(d)

Granted under the 20002010 savings-related share option scheme.

 

96    CRHLOGO


CRH      119


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Shareholding guidelines for executive Directors

TheRemuneration Committee adopted a policy in 2013 whereby executive Directors are required to build up (and maintain), within five years of appointment a minimum holding in CRH shares which is equivalent to one times basic salary. For existing executive Directors this level must be achieved by 31 December 2015, unless the executive Director has a significant change in role which results in a step change in salary in which case the one times salary level

must be achieved within five years of the change. The shareholding levels as a multiple of basic salary are shown in table 40.

Following his appointment as Chief Executive on 1 January 2014, theRemuneration Committee determined that Albert Manifold will be required to meet the shareholding guideline by 31 December 2017.

As part of the remuneration review carried out in 2013, theRemuneration

Committee considered whether the shareholding level should be increased, particularly in relation to the Chief Executive role. TheRemuneration Committee concluded that, as the guidelines were only recently introduced, it was not appropriate to increase the requirement at this time. However, the Committee will look to increase shareholding guidelines in the future as the Chief Executive builds on his existing holding.

LOGO

*The shareholdings are calculated based on the closing share price on 24 February 2015 (€24.92) and do not include Deferred Shares to be awarded under the 2014 Annual Bonus Plan (which will be released in 2018). If the Deferred Shares were included in the above table (on a post-tax basis) the executive Directors’ shareholdings would be approximately 0.9, 3.2 and 2.6 times salary respectively.

120      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Shareholdings of Directors and Company Secretary as at 31 December 2014

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDirectors’ Interests in Share Capital at 31 December 2014 (Audited)

    Table 41    

 

The interests of the Directors and Secretary in the shares of the Company, which are beneficial unless otherwise indicated, are shown below.

The Directors and Secretary have no beneficial interests in any of the Group’s subsidiary, joint venture or associated undertakings.

 

   

  

  6 March     31 December     31 December  

Ordinary Shares

 

  

 

2015

 

  

 

   

 

2014

 

  

 

   

 

2013

 

  

 

 

Directors

                

E.J. Bärtschi

  25,200      25,200      7,200  

M. Carton

  82,546      82,036      60,100  

W.P. Egan

  16,112      16,112      16,112  

- Non-beneficial

  12,000      12,000      12,000  

U-H. Felcht

  1,285      1,285      1,285  

N. Hartery

  12,265      12,265      1,430  

J.W. Kennedy

  1,083      1,083      1,049  

P.J. Kennedy

  2,000      -      -  

D.A. McGovern, Jr.

  5,131      5,131      4,000  

H.A. McSharry

  3,886      3,886      3,789  

A. Manifold

  42,518      39,998      38,981  

D.N. O’Connor

  17,344      17,344      16,915  

H. Th. Rottinghuis

  15,124      15,124      -** 

M. Towe

  105,276    100,276    77,117  
 

Secretary

                

N. Colgan

  9,463     15,549     10,836  
           351,233     347,289     250,814  
 

Of the above holdings, the following are held in the form of American Depository Receipts:

 

  

 

 

 

 

6 March

 

  

  

 

 

 

31 December

 

  

  

 

 

 

31 December

 

  

   

 

2015

 

  

 

   

 

2014

 

  

 

   

 

2013

 

  

 

 

W.P. Egan

  15,000      15,000      15,000  

- Non-beneficial

  12,000      12,000      12,000  

D.A. McGovern, Jr.

  5,131      5,131      4,000  

 

Patrick J. Kennedy became a Director on 1 January 2015.

 

Lucinda Riches became a Director on 1 March 2015. She does not have a holding of CRH shares.

 

*   Excludes awards of Deferred Shares, details of which are disclosed in table 35 on page 118.

** Holding at date of appointment

 

  

  

     

    

LOGO

CRH      121


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Non-executive Directors

Remuneration paid to non-executive Directors in 2014 is set out in table 42 below.

The remuneration of non-executive Directors is determined by the Board of Directors as a whole. In determining

the remuneration, the Board receives recommendations from a committee of the Chairman and the executive Directors. TheRemuneration Committeedetermines the remuneration of the Chairman.

Fees for the non-executive Directors were reviewed during 2014. It was concluded that CRH’s fees are competitively positioned at present and should remain unchanged in 2015.

Fees for 2015 are set out in table 43 below.

   Individual Remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2014 (Audited)

  Table 42    

                                                                                                                              
     Basic     Other         
   Salary and Fees  Benefits  Remuneration  Total  Total  Total
   (a)  (b)  (c)      
   € 000  € 000  € 000  € 000  € 000  € 000
 
   2014  2014  2014  2014  2013  2012
 
 

Non-executive Directors

                  
 

E.J. Bärtschi

    68    -    71     139     116     105    
 

W.P. Egan

    68    -    52     120     120     120    
 

U-H. Felcht

    68    -    37     105     105     105    

    

 

N. Hartery (d)

    68  10  382     460     473     305    
 

J.M. de Jong (e)

    24    5    13       42     128     139    
 

J.W. Kennedy

    68    -    37     105     105     105    
 

D.A. McGovern Jr. (f)

    68    -    52     120       60          -    
 

K. McGowan (d)

      -    -      -          -          -     145    
 

H.A. McSharry (g)

    68    -    22       90       90       77    
 

D.N. O’Connor

    68    -    56     124     124     112    
 

H.Th. Rottinghuis (h)

    59    -    27       86          -          -    
    627  15  749  1,391  1,321  1,213    

(a)

Fee levels for non-executive Directors were unchanged in 2014.

(b)

Benefits: In the case of Nicky Hartery the amount reflects the reimbursement of travel expenses from his residence to his Chairman’s office in Dublin, which have been grossed up for Irish tax purposes. In the case of Jan Maarten de Jong, it includes the value of a gift given to him on his retirement.

(c)

Other Remuneration: Includes remuneration for Chairman, Board Committee work and allowances for non-executive Directors based outside of Ireland.

(d)

Nicky Hartery became Chairman on 9 May 2012 succeeding Kieran McGowan who retired as a non-executive Director on the same date.

(e)

Jan Maarten de Jong retired as a Director on 7 May 2014.

(f)

Don McGovern became a Director on 1 July 2013.

(g)

Heather Ann McSharry became a Director on 22 February 2012.

(h)

Henk Rottinghuis became a Director on 18 February 2014.

 

 

   Non-executive Director Fee Structure

  Table 43    

RoleAmount

Group Chairman(including non-executive Director salary and fees for committee work)

450,000

Non-executive Director(basic salary and fees for committee work)

90,000

Additional fees:

Senior Independent Director/Remuneration Committee Chairman*

34,000

Audit Committee Chairman

34,000

Fee for Europe-based non-executive Directors

15,000

Fee for US-based non-executive Directors

30,000

*  If the roles of Senior Independent Director and Remuneration Committee Chair are not combined, fees of €25,000 and €15,000 apply respectively.

122      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

LOGO

LOGO

(i)For the purposes of comparability, the FTSE 100 Index has been converted to euro using the closing exchange rate at each year-end.

Other Disclosures

Fees paid to former Directors

No payments have been made to individual former directors in excess of the de minimis threshold of €20,000 per annum agreed by theRemuneration Committee.

Executives’ external appointments

The executive Directors may accept external appointments with the prior approval of the Board provided that such appointments do not prejudice the individual’s ability to fulfil their duties at the Group. Whether any related fees are retained by the individual or remitted to the Group is considered on a case-by-case basis.

Remuneration paid to Chief Executive 2009 - 2014

Table 46 below shows the total remuneration paid to the Chief Executive in the period 2009 to 2014 inclusive and shows bonuses and vested long-term incentive awards as a percentage of the maximum bonus and award that could have been received in each year. Albert Manifold succeeded Myles Lee as Chief Executive effective from 1 January 2014.

The percentage increase in the Chief Executive’s salary in the period 2009 to 2014 is set out in table 14 on page 108.

The percentage change in the Chief Executive’s salary, benefits and bonus between 2013 and 2014 was as follows:

Salary     +1.7%

Benefits  +69.6%

Bonus     +327.6%

The combined percentage change was +87.1%.

There was a 1.5% increase in the total average employment costs in respect of employees in the Group as a whole between 2013 and 2014.

Maeve Carton was appointed as a non-executive member of the National Treasury Management Agency, an Irish state body that provides asset and liability management services to the Irish government in December 2014.

Total Shareholder Return

The value at 31 December 2014 of €100 invested in 2004 and 2008 respectively, compared with the value of €100 invested in the Eurofirst 300 Index and the FTSE 100 Index (which CRH joined in December 2011) is shown in the graphs above.

TSR performance has been compared against the FTSE 100 and the Eurofirst 300 as these are broad general market indices on which CRH is a constituent. The Committee, therefore, considers that they offer a reasonable comparison for performance.

Compound TSR growth since the formation of the Group in 1970 (assuming the reinvestment of dividends) is 15.7%.

LOGO

1  Value of bonus award each year as a percentage of the maximum opportunity.

2  Value of vested incentive awards as a percentage of the maximum opportunity; in respect of 2013 the long-term incentive award value is made up of vestings under the 2006 Performance Share Plan (49.1% of maximum) and the 2009 CEO LTIP (33.7% of maximum). There was no long-term incentive vesting in relation to awards with a performance period ending in 2012 or 2014.

LOGO

CRH      123


                       Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

LOGO

Relative importance of spend on pay

Table 47 across sets out the amount paid by the Group in remuneration to employees compared to dividend distributions made to shareholders in 2013 and 2014. The average number of employees is set out in note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 152. We have also shown the change in EBITDA (as defined)* performance year on year to provide an indication of the change in profit performance.

TheRemuneration Committee and Advisors

The non-executive Directors who were members of theRemuneration Committee during 2014, together with their record of attendance at Committee meetings, are identified on page 104. Don McGovern joined the Committee with effect from 1 January 2015.

Risk policies and systems

During 2014, the Chairman of theRemuneration Committee reviewed with theAudit Committee the Group’s remuneration structures from a risk perspective.

Remuneration consultants

Deloitte LLP was appointed as the Committee’s remuneration consultants in 2013 following a tender process. The Committee has satisfied itself that the advice provided by Deloitte is robust and independent and that the Deloitte LLP engagement partner and team that provide remuneration advice to the Committee do not have connections with CRH plc that may impair their independence. Deloitte are signatories to the Voluntary Code of Conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK.

During 2014, Deloitte provided the following remuneration services:

research and advice regarding remuneration trends, best practice and remuneration levels for executive and non-executive directors in companies of similar size and complexity;

guidance and advice in relation to remuneration developments;

analysis of TSR workings under the 2006 Performance Share Plan;

LOGO

  2014 AGM – Remuneration Related Votes

Table 48  

      
  % in Favour  

 

 % Against  

 

 No. of votes
withheld

 

 Total No. of
votes cast
(incl. votes
withheld)

 

 % of issued
share capital

 

Directors’ Remuneration Report (“Say on Pay”)

 98.1% 1.9% 13,587,697  511,227,387  69.6%

Remuneration Policy Report

 95.2% 4.8% 3,648,186  511,208,343  69.6%
           

advice in relation to remuneration matters generally; and

attendance at Committee meetings, when required.

Deloitte also provide other consultancy services to the Company in relation to support for Internal Audit, when required and in respect of talent management and human resources, taxation and sustainability.

In respect of work carried out by Deloitte on behalf of theRemuneration Committee in 2014, fees in the amount of €49,000 were incurred.

2014 Annual General Meeting votes on remuneration matters

The voting outcome in respect of the remuneration related votes at the 2014 Annual General Meeting is set out in table 48 above.

Shareholder Engagement

The Chairman and theRemuneration Committee Chairman met with a number of the Group’s major shareholders in advance of the 2014 Annual General

Meeting. No issues of concern in relation to remuneration arose. As the voting was overwhelmingly in favour of the “Say on Pay” resolution, following the meeting theRemuneration Committee determined that there were no concerns with the Group’s remuneration structures that required investigation.

Following the 2014 Annual General Meeting we also met with a major shareholder to discuss the metrics used for CRH’s long-term incentive structures and we received correspondence from another shareholder regarding their perspectives in relation to the disclosure of annual targets (which we believe our disclosures on pages 113 and 114 address).

*  Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

124      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Details of remuneration charged against profit in 2014

Directors’ Remuneration1(Audited)

Table 49  

      2014                 2013                 2012      
    € 000     € 000     € 000      

                

                 
 Executive Directors               
 Basic salary   2,861     3,591     3,512      
 Performance-related incentive plan               
  - cash element   3,219     1,833     1,540      
  - deferred shares element   1,073     54     -      
 Retirement benefits expense   1,026     1,660     1,645      
 Benefits   114     126     128      
    8,293     7,264     6,825      
 Provision for Chief Executive long-term incentive plan2   -     (1,062)     460      
 Total executive Directors’ remuneration   8,293     6,202     7,285      
 Average number of executive Directors   3.00     4.00     4.00      
 Non-executive Directors               
 Fees   627     578     557      
 Other remuneration   749     720     656      
 Benefits   15     23     -      
 Total non-executive Directors’ remuneration   1,391     1,321     1,213      
 Average number of non-executive Directors   9.30     8.50     8.20      
                 
 Payments to former Directors3   23     23     29      
 Total Directors’ remuneration   9,707     7,546     8,527      
            1 

See analysis of 2014 remuneration by individual in tables 18 and 42 on pages 111 and 122.

As set out on page 95 of the 2013 Annual Report on Form 20-F, former Chief Executive Myles Lee had a special long-term incentive plan tied to the achievement of exceptional growth and key strategic goals for the five-year period 2009 to 2013 with a total maximum earnings potential of 40% of aggregate basic salary, amounting to a potential €2,312,000. The actual earnings under this plan amounted to €778,127, payment of which was made in 2014. Annual provisions of 40% of basic salary were made in respect of this plan for the years 2009 through 2012 amounting in total to €1,840,000. The difference between the total provided for and the sum paid, which amounts to €1,061,873, is reflected as a reduction in the amount of total Directors’ remuneration for 2013.

Consulting and other fees paid to a number of former directors.

LOGO

CRH      125


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Remuneration Policy Summary

The following summarises the key elements of CRH’s Remuneration Policy (the “Policy”), which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting. A copy of the Policy is available on the Group’s website, www.crh.com.

As an Irish incorporated company, CRH is not required to comply with section 439A of the UK Companies Act 2006 which requires UK companies to submit their remuneration policy to a binding shareholder vote. However, maintaining high levels of corporate governance is important to CRH and, therefore, the Company intends to operate within the Policy unless it is not practical to do so in exceptional circumstances. However, as an Irish incorporated company, CRH cannot rely on the statutory provisions applicable to UK companies under the 2013 UK Regulations which, in certain circumstances, can resolve any inconsistency between a remuneration policy and any contractual or other right of a Director. In the event there were to be such an inconsistency the Company may be obliged to honour any such right, notwithstanding it may be inconsistent with the Policy.

TheRemuneration Committee’s aim is to make sure that CRH’s pay structures are fair, responsible and competitive, in order that CRH can attract and retain staff of the calibre necessary for it to compete in all of its markets.

The Group’s remuneration structures are designed to drive performance and link rewards to responsibility and the individual contribution of executives. It is policy to grant participation in the Group’s performance-related plans to key management to encourage identification with shareholders’ interests and to create a community of interest among different regions and nationalities.

The policy on Directors’ remuneration, which is derived from the overall Group policy, is designed to:

help attract and retain Directors of the highest calibre who can bring their experience and independent views to the policy, strategic decisions and governance of CRH;
properly reward and motivate executive Directors to perform in the long-term interest of the shareholders;

provide an appropriate blend of fixed and variable remuneration and short and long-term incentives for executive Directors;

complement CRH’s strategy of fostering entrepreneurship in its regional companies by rewarding the creation of shareholder value through organic and acquisitive growth;

reflect the spread of the Group’s operations so that remuneration packages in each geographical area are appropriate and competitive for that area; and

reflect the risk policies of the Group.

In setting remuneration levels, theRemuneration Committee takes into consideration the remuneration practices of other international companies of similar size and scope and trends in executive remuneration generally, in each of the regions in which the Company operates. TheRemuneration Committee also takes into account the EU Commission’s recommendations on remuneration in listed companies.

Executive Director service contracts and policy on payment for loss of office

When determining leaving arrangements for an executive Director, the Committee takes into account any contractual agreements (including any incentive arrangements) and the performance and conduct of the individual.

Service contracts

The Chief Executive has entered into a service contract with the Company. Table 51 on page 127 sets out the key remuneration terms of this contract.

The Finance Director (Maeve Carton) and Chief Executive, Oldcastle, Inc. (Mark Towe) do not currently have service contracts. They do not have a notice period in excess of 12 months or an entitlement to any benefits on termination of employment. The Committee will determine the amount, if any, paid on termination taking into account the circumstances around departure and the prevailing employment law.

The Committee’s policy in this area is that service contracts will be put in place for newly appointed executive Directors and in cases where there is a significant step change in Directors’ responsibilities. It is currently anticipated that these terms will be similar to those agreed with the Chief Executive.

Under Irish company law, CRH is not required to make service contracts available for inspection as the notice period is less than 12 months. Service contracts will only be available with the executive Director’s consent due to data protection reasons.

On behalf of the Board

Dan O’Connor

Remuneration Committee Chairman

126      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Remuneration Policy for non-executive Directors

Approach to Setting Fees

Basis of Fees

Other Items

Table 50

•   The remuneration of non-executive Directors is determined by a Board committee of the Chairman and the executive Directors.

•   TheRemuneration Committeedetermines the remuneration of the Chairman within the framework or broad policy agreed with the Board.

•   Remuneration is set at a level which will attract individuals with the necessary experience and ability to make a substantial contribution to the Company’s affairs and reflect the time and travel demands of Board duties.

•   Fees are set taking into account typical practice at other companies of a similar size and complexity to CRH.

•   Fees are reviewed at appropriate intervals.

•   Fees are paid in cash.

•   Non-executive Director fees policy is to pay:

-   A basic fee for membership of the Board;

-   An additional fee for chairing a Committee;

-   An additional fee for the role of Senior Independent Director (SID) (if the SID is not the Chairman of theRemunerationCommittee);

-   An additional fee to reflect committee work (combined fee for all committee roles); and

-   An additional fee based on the location of the Director to reflect time spent travelling to Board meetings.

•   Other fees may also be paid to reflect other board roles or responsibilities.

•   In accordance with the Articles of Association, shareholders set the maximum aggregate amount of the fees payable to non-executive Directors. The current limit of750,000 was set by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in 2005.

•   The non-executive Directors do not participate in any of the Company’s performance-related incentive plans or share schemes.

•   Non-executive Directors do not receive pensions.

•   The Group Chairman is reimbursed for expenses incurred in travelling from his residence to his CRH office. The Company settles any tax incurred on this on his behalf.

•   Non-executive Directors do not currently receive any benefits. However, benefits may be provided in the future if, in the view of the Board (for non-executive Directors or for the Chairman), this was considered appropriate. The Company may settle any tax due on benefits.

Chief Executive Service Contract

Table 51

Notice period

•   12 months’ notice by the Company or the executive.

Expiry date

•   Indefinite duration.

•   Terms of contract will automatically terminate on the executive’s 62nd birthday.

Termination payments

•   On lawful termination of employment, the Committee may, at its absolute discretion, make a termination payment in lieu of 12 months’ notice based on base salary, benefits and pension contribution due during that period.

•   Where the Company terminates the contract lawfully without notice then no payment in lieu of notice shall be due.

•   If, in the event of a change of control, there is a diminution in the role and responsibilities of the Chief Executive he may terminate the contract; on such termination a payment equal to one year’s remuneration (being salary, pension, other benefits and vested incentive awards) will be made to the executive.

Disability

•   In the event that the Chief Executive falls ill or is injured in such a way as which would constitute ill-health or disablement so that the Chief Executive could not work for a period of more than six months, in lieu of the early ill-health retirement provisions in the pension scheme which would otherwise operate in such cases, he shall be entitled to receive a disability salary of1,000,000 per annum. Such payment would cease when the Chief Executive reaches age 60, returns to work or if the service agreement is terminated.

Other information    

•   The Company retains the ability to suspend the executive from employment on full salary and to require the executive to observe a period of “garden leave” of up to 12 months on full salary, contractual benefits and pension contribution.

LOGO

CRH      127


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Policy table

Further details regarding the operation of the Policy can be found on pages 111 to 125 of the Annual Statement on Remuneration.

Fixed

Element

Base salary

Pension

Purpose and link to strategy    

•   Competitive salaries help to attract and retain staff with the experience and knowledge required to enable the Group to compete in
its markets.

•   Pension arrangements provide competitive and appropriate retirement plans.

•   Given the long-term nature of the business, pension is an important part of the remuneration package to support creation of value and succession planning.

Operation

•   Base salaries are set by the Committee
taking into account:

–   the size and scope of the executive Director’s role and responsibilities;

–   the individual’s skills, experience and performance;

–   salary levels at FTSE listed companies of
a similar size and complexity to CRH and other international construction and
building materials companies; and

–   pay and conditions elsewhere in the Group.

•   Base salary is normally reviewed annually with changes generally effective on 1 January, although the Committee may make an out-of-cycle increase if it considers it to be appropriate.

•   Irish-based executive Directors participate in a contributory defined benefit scheme.

•   The US-based executive Director participates in a defined contribution scheme and in an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP).

•   The defined benefit scheme which the Directors participate in is closed to new entrants.

•   For new appointments to the Board, the Committee may determine that alternative pension provisions will operate (for example a defined contribution scheme or cash contribution). When determining pension arrangements for new appointments, the Committee will give regard to existing entitlements, the cost of the arrangements, market practice and the pension arrangements received elsewhere in the Group.

Maximum opportunity

•   Base salaries are set at a level which the Committee considers to be appropriate taking into consideration the factors outlined in the “operation” section.

•   While there is no maximum base salary, normally increases will be in line with the typical level of increase awarded to other employees in the Group but may be higher in certain circumstances. These circumstances may include:

–   Where a new executive Director has been appointed at a lower salary, higher increases may be awarded over an initial period as the executive Director gains in experience and the salary is moved to what the Committee considers is an appropriate positioning;

–   Where there has been a significant increase in the scope or responsibility of an executive Director’s role or where an individual has been internally promoted, higher salary increases may be awarded; and

–   Where a larger increase is considered necessary to reflect significant changes in market practice.

•   The defined benefit pension is provided through an Irish Revenue approved retirement benefit scheme up until the pension cap established in the Finance Act 2006 (see details on page 111). Accrued benefits for service to 31 December 2011 are based on pensionable salary and years of service as at that date (annual accrual of 1/60th), with this tranche being revalued annually at the Consumer Price Index subject to a 5% ceiling. For service subsequent to that date, a career-average revalued earnings system was introduced with each year of service being subject to annual revaluation on the same basis as outlined above. Irish based executive Directors receive a supplementary taxable non-pensionable cash allowance in lieu of pension benefits foregone as a result of the pension cap. These allowances are similar in value to the reduction in the Company’s liability represented by the pension benefit foregone. Whilst there is no absolute maximum to the quantum of these payments they are calculated based on actuarial advice as the equivalent of the reduction in the Company’s liability to each individual and spread over the term to retirement as annual compensation allowances.

•   The US-based executive Director participates in a defined contribution retirement plan in respect of basic salary; and in addition he participates in an unfunded defined contribution SERP also in respect of basic salary, to which contributions are made at an agreed rate (20%), offset by contributions made to the other retirement plan.

Performance measures

n/a

n/a

128      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Table 52

Benefits

•   To provide a market-competitive level of benefits for executive Directors.

•   The Committee’s policy is to set benefit provision at an appropriate market competitive level taking into account market practice, the level of benefits provided for other employees in the Group, the individual’s home jurisdiction and the jurisdiction in which the individual is based.

•   Employment-related benefits include the use of company cars (or a car allowance), medical insurance for the Director and his/her family/life assurance.

•   In the event that the Chief Executive falls ill or is injured in such a way as which would constitute ill-health or disablement so that the Chief Executive could not work for a period of more than six months, in lieu of the early ill-health retirement provisions in the pension scheme which would otherwise operate in such cases, he shall be entitled to receive a disability salary of1,000,000 per annum. Such payment would cease when the Chief Executive reaches age 60, returns to work or if the service agreement is terminated.

•   The Chief Executive, Oldcastle Inc. also receives benefits in relation to club membership and short term disability insurance.

•   Benefits may also be provided in respect of legal fees incurred in respect of agreeing service contracts, or similar agreements (for which the Company may settle any tax incurred by the executive Director) and a gift on retirement.

•   The Committee may remove benefits that executive Directors receive or introduce other benefits if it is considered appropriate to do so. The Company may also pay the tax due on benefits if it considers that it is appropriate to do so.

•   All-employee share schemes– executive Directors are eligible to participate in the Company’s all-employee share schemes on the same terms as other employees.

•   Relocation policy– where executive Directors are required to relocate to take up their role, the Committee may determine that they should receive appropriate relocation and ongoing expatriate benefits. The level of such benefits would be determined based on individual circumstances taking into account typical market practice.

•   The level of benefit provided will depend on the cost of providing individual items and the individual’s circumstances, and therefore the Committee has not set a maximum level of benefits.

n/a

LOGO

CRH      129


LOGO

Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Policy table continued

Performance-related pay

Element

Annual Bonus Plan

Purpose and link to strategy    

•   The Annual Performance-related Incentive Plan is designed to reward the creation of shareholder value through operational excellence and organic and acquisitive growth. The Plan incentivises executive Directors to deliver Group and individual goals that support long-term value creation.

•   A Deferred Annual Performance-related Incentive Plan element links the value of executive Directors’ reward with the long-term performance of the CRH share price and aligns the interests of executive Directors with shareholders’ interests.

•   The ‘malus’ provision enables the Company to mitigate risk.

Operation

•   The Annual Performance-related Incentive Plan rewards executive Directors for meeting Company performance goals over a financial year of the Company. Targets are set annually by the Committee.

•   The annual bonus is paid in a mix of cash and shares (structured as a deferred share award).

•   For 2014:

–   75% of the bonus will be paid in cash; and

–   25% will be paid in shares.

•   In future years, the Committee may determine that a different balance between cash and shares is appropriate and adjust the relevant payments accordingly.

•   When assessing performance and determining bonus payouts the Committee also considers the underlying financial performance of the business to ensure it is consistent with the overall award level.

•   The deferred element of the bonus will be structured as a conditional share award or nil cost option and will normally vest after three years from grant (or a different period determined by the Committee). Deferred share awards may be settled in cash.

•   Dividend equivalents may be paid on deferred share awards in respect of dividends paid during the vesting period. These payments may be made in cash or shares and may assume the reinvestment of dividends on a cumulative basis.

•   For deferred awards granted from 2014, malus provisions apply. Cash bonus payments may be subject to clawback of the net amount paid for a period of three years from payment.

Maximum opportunity

•   Maximum annual opportunity of 150% of base salary.

Performance measures

•   The Annual Performance-related Incentive Plan is based on achieving clearly defined and stretching annual targets and strategic goals set by the Committee each year based on key business priorities.

•   The performance metrics used are a mix of financial targets including return goals and personal/strategic objectives generally including safety. Currently 80% of the bonus is based on financial performance measures. The Committee may vary the weightings of measures but no less than 50% shall be based on financial performance measures.

•   A portion of the bonus metrics for any Director may be linked to his/her specific area of responsibility.

•   Up to 50% of the maximum bonus will be paid for achieving target levels of performance.

130      CRH


Directors’ Remuneration Report |continued

Table 52

2014 Performance Share Plan (PSP)

•   The role of the PSP is to align the interest of key management across different regions and nationalities with those of shareholders through an interest in CRH shares and by incentivising the achievement of long-term performance goals.

•   Awards (in the form of conditional share awards or nil cost options) normally vest based on performance over a period of not less than three years. Awards may also be settled in cash.

•   Awards are normally subject to an additional holding period ending on the fifth anniversary of the grant date (or another date determined by the Committee).

•   Dividend equivalents may be paid on PSP awards that vest in respect of dividends paid during the vesting period until the end of the holding period. These payments may be made in cash or shares and may assume reinvestment on a cumulative basis.

•   For 2014 awards onwards, malus provisions (as set out in the rules of the PSP) will apply to awards.

•   The normal maximum award is 250% of salary per annum. In exceptional circumstances, the Committee may grant awards of up to 350% of base salary.

•   For 2014 the intended award levels are:

–   Chief Executive – 250% of base salary

–   Other executive Directors – 200% of base salary

•   Awards to be granted in 2014 will vest based on a relative TSR return compared to key peers and cumulative cash flow performance.

•   For threshold levels of performance 25% of the award vests with straight-line vesting to maximum.

•   When determining vesting under the PSP the Committee reviews whether the TSR performance has been impacted by unusual events and whether it, therefore, reflects the underlying performance of the business. In addition, the Committee will consider financial performance (including EPS) in the period to ensure that TSR performance is consistent with the objectives of the performance criteria and was not distorted by extraneous factors.

•   The Committee may amend the performance conditions if an event occurs that causes it to consider that an amended performance condition would be more appropriate and would not be materially less difficult to satisfy.

LOGO

CRH      131


LOGO

Consolidated Financial Statements

The following financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the reports of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are filed as part of this Annual Report:

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  98133

Consolidated Income Statement

  100135

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

  100135

Consolidated Balance Sheet

  101136

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

  102137

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  103138

Accounting Policies

  104139

Notes on Consolidated Financial Statements

146

 118

 

CRH    97

132      CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Auditors’ Report

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of CRH public limited company:company (CRH plc):

We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of CRH public limited companyplc as of 31 December 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the related Consolidated Income Statements and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Changes in Equity and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2011.2014. These financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statementConsolidated Financial Statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CRH public limited companyplc at 31 December 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2011,2014, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CRH public limited company’splc’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2011,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated 2811 March 20122015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ERNST & YOUNG

Dublin, Ireland

2811 March 20122015

 

98    CRHLOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      133

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Auditors’ Report


LOGO

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER

FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of CRH public limited company:company (CRH plc):

We have audited CRH public limited company’splc’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2011,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the “COSO criteria”). CRH public limited company’splc’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of business combinations completed during the year ended 31 December 2011,2014, which are included in the 20112014 Consolidated Financial Statements of CRH public limited companyplc and constituted 3.1%0.7% and 5.5%1.2% of total and net assets, respectively, as of 31 December 20112014 and 0.9%0.6% and 1.3%0.8% of revenues and Group profit, for the financial year, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of CRH public limited companyplc also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of business combinations completed during the year ended 31 December 2011.2014.

In our opinion, CRH public limited companyplc maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2011,2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 20112014 Consolidated Financial Statements of CRH public limited companyplc and our report dated 2811 March 20122015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ERNST & YOUNG

Dublin, Ireland

2811 March 20122015

 

CRH    99

134      CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Income Statement

for the financial year ended 31 December 20112014

 

       2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 
Notes            

1

  Revenue  18,081    17,173    17,373  

3

  Cost of sales  (13,179  (12,363  (12,510
  Gross profit  4,902    4,810    4,863  

3

  Operating costs  (4,031  (4,112  (3,908

1,4,6

  Group operating profit  871    698    955  

1,5

  Profit on disposals  55    55    26  
  Profit before finance costs  926    753    981  

9

  Finance costs  (262  (255  (305

9

  Finance income  33    37    35  

9

  Other financial expense  (28  (29  (27

10

  Group share of associates’ profit after tax  42    28    48  

1

  Profit before tax  711    534    732  

11

  Income tax expense  (114  (95  (134
   Group profit for the financial year  597    439    598  
  Profit attributable to:   
  Equity holders of the Company  590    432    592  
   Non-controlling interests  7    7    6  
   Group profit for the financial year  597    439    598  

13

  Basic earnings per Ordinary Share  82.6c    61.3c    88.3c  

13

  Diluted earnings per Ordinary Share  82.6c    61.2c    87.9c  
  All of the results relate to continuing operations.   

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

for the financial year ended 31 December 2011

 

  

  

       2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 
Notes            
   Group profit for the financial year  597    439    598  
  Other comprehensive income   
  Currency translation effects  107    519    (96

28

  Actuarial loss on Group defined benefit pension obligations  (278  (33  (67

24

  (Losses)/gains relating to cash flow hedges  (7  10    15  

11

  Tax on items recognised directly within other comprehensive income  58    4    18  
   Net (expense)/income recognised directly within other comprehensive income  (120  500    (130
   Total comprehensive income for the financial year  477    939    468  
  Attributable to:   
  Equity holders of the Company  470    927    462  
   Non-controlling interests  7    12    6  
   Total comprehensive income for the financial year  477    939    468  
        

2014

€m

  

2013

m

  

2012

m

 
 Notes        
 1    Revenue   18,912    18,031    18,084  
 2    Cost of sales   (13,427  (13,153  (13,018
  Gross profit   5,485    4,878    5,066  
 2    Operating costs   (4,568  (4,778  (4,261
 1,3,5,6    Group operating profit   917    100    805  
 1,4    Profit on disposals   77    26    230  
  Profit before finance costs   994    126    1,035  
 8    Finance costs   (254  (262  (271
 8    Finance income   8    13    15  
 8    Other financial expense   (42  (48  (49
 9    Share of equity accounted investments’ profit/(loss)   55    (44  (84
 1    Profit/(loss) before tax   761    (215  646  
 10    Income tax expense   (177  (80  (106
  Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   584    (295  540  
  Profit/(loss) attributable to:    
  Equity holders of the Company   582    (296  538  
  Non-controlling interests   2    1    2  
  Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   584    (295  540  
 12    Basic earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share   78.9c    (40.6c  74.6c  
 12    Diluted earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share   78.8c    (40.6c  74.5c  
  All of the results relate to continuing operations.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

for the financial year ended 31 December 2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

        2014
€m
  2013
m
  2012
m
 
 Notes        
  Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   584    (295  540  
  Other comprehensive income    
  Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:    
  Currency translation effects   599    (373  (51
 24    Losses relating to cash flow hedges   (6  (2  1  
      593    (375  (50
  Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:    
 27    Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations   (414  162    (146
 10    Tax on items recognised directly within other comprehensive income   69    (43  23  
      (345  119    (123
  Total other comprehensive income for the financial year   248    (256  (173
  Total comprehensive income for the financial year   832    (551  367  
  Attributable to:    
  Equity holders of the Company   830    (552  366  
  Non-controlling interests   2    1    1  
  Total comprehensive income for the financial year   832    (551  367  

 

100    CRHLOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      135

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

as at 31 December 20112014

 

        2011
m
  2010
m
 
Notes          
  ASSETS   
  Non-current assets   

14

  Property, plant and equipment   8,936    8,892  

15

  Intangible assets   4,488    4,305  

16

  Investments accounted for using the equity method   948    1,037  

16

  Other financial assets   239    149  

24

  Derivative financial instruments   181    194  

27

  Deferred income tax assets   290    385  
   Total non-current assets   15,082    14,962  
  Current assets   

17

  Inventories   2,286    2,187  

18

  Trade and other receivables   2,663    2,419  
  Current income tax recoverable   8    112  

24

  Derivative financial instruments   24    14  

22

  Liquid investments   29    37  

22

  Cash and cash equivalents   1,295    1,730  
   Total current assets   6,305    6,499  
   Total assets   21,387    21,461  
   EQUITY       
   Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders       

29

  Equity share capital   247    244  

29

  Preference share capital   1    1  

29

  Share premium account   4,047    3,915  

29

  Treasury Shares and own shares   (183  (199
  Other reserves   168    147  
  Foreign currency translation reserve   (119  (226
   Retained income   6,348    6,446  
     10,509    10,328  
   Non-controlling interests   74    83  
   Total equity   10,583    10,411  
  LIABILITIES   
  Non-current liabilities   

23

  Interest-bearing loans and borrowings   4,463    4,695  

24

  Derivative financial instruments   20    33  

27

  Deferred income tax liabilities   1,492    1,693  

19

  Trade and other payables   204    163  

28

  Retirement benefit obligations   664    474  

26

  Provisions for liabilities   252    253  
   Total non-current liabilities   7,095    7,311  
  Current liabilities   

19

  Trade and other payables   2,858    2,686  
  Current income tax liabilities   201    199  

23

  Interest-bearing loans and borrowings   519    666  

24

  Derivative financial instruments   10    54  

26

  Provisions for liabilities   121    134  
   Total current liabilities   3,709    3,739  
   Total liabilities   10,804    11,050  
   Total equity and liabilities   21,387    21,461  

CRH    101


Consolidated Financial Statements

       

2014

€m

  

2013

m

 
 Notes      
  ASSETS  
  Non-current assets  
 13    Property, plant and equipment  7,422    7,539  
 14    Intangible assets  4,173    3,911  
 15    Investments accounted for using the equity method  1,329    1,340  
 15    Other financial assets  23    23  
 17    Other receivables  85    93  
 24    Derivative financial instruments  87    63  
 26    Deferred income tax assets  171    107  
  Total non-current assets  13,290    13,076  
  Current assets  
 16    Inventories  2,260    2,254  
 17    Trade and other receivables  2,644    2,516  
  Current income tax recoverable  15    26  
 24    Derivative financial instruments  15    17  
 22    Cash and cash equivalents  3,262    2,540  
 4    Assets held for sale  531    -  
  Total current assets  8,727    7,353  
  Total assets          22,017            20,429  
  EQUITY  
  Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders  
 28    Equity share capital  253    251  
 28    Preference share capital  1    1  
 28    Share premium account  4,324    4,219  
 28    Treasury Shares and own shares  (76  (118
  Other reserves  213    197  
  Foreign currency translation reserve  57    (542
  Retained income  5,405    5,654  
    10,177    9,662  
  Non-controlling interests  21    24  
  Total equity  10,198    9,686  
  LIABILITIES  
  Non-current liabilities  
 23    Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  5,419    4,579  
 24    Derivative financial instruments  3    34  
 26    Deferred income tax liabilities  1,305    1,166  
 18    Other payables  257    289  
 27    Retirement benefit obligations  711    410  
 25    Provisions for liabilities  257    231  
  Total non-current liabilities  7,952    6,709  
  Current liabilities  
 18    Trade and other payables  2,894    2,754  
  Current income tax liabilities  154    151  
 23    Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  447    961  
 24    Derivative financial instruments  20    19  
 25    Provisions for liabilities  139    149  
 4    Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale  213    -  
  Total current liabilities  3,867    4,034  
  Total liabilities  11,819    10,743  
  Total equity and liabilities  22,017    20,429  

 

136      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

for the financial year ended 31 December 20112014

 

       Attributable to the equity holders of the Company       
       Issued
share
capital
   Share
premium
account
   

Treasury

Shares/
own
shares

  Other
reserves
   

Foreign

currency
translation
reserve

  Retained
income
  Non -
controlling
interests
  Total
equity
 
Notes       m   m   m  m   m  m  m  m 
  At 1 January 2011   245     3,915     (199  147     (226  6,446    83    10,411  
  Group profit for the financial year   -     -     -    -     -    590    7    597  
  Other comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     107    (227  -    (120
  Total comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     107    363    7    477  
 29    Issue of share capital (net of expenses)   3     132     -    -     -    -    -    135  
 8    Share-based payment expense            
  - share option schemes   -     -     -    9     -    -    -    9  
  - Performance Share Plan (PSP)   -     -     -    12     -    -    -    12  
  Treasury/own shares reissued   -     -     16    -     -    (16  -    -  
  Share option exercises   -     -     -    -     -    6    -    6  
 12    Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends)   -     -     -    -     -    (445  (9  (454
 31    Non-controlling interests arising on acquisition of subsidiaries   -     -     -    -     -    -    (2  (2
  Acquisition of non-controlling interests   -     -     -    -     -    (6  (5  (11
  At 31 December 2011   248     4,047     (183  168     (119  6,348    74    10,583  
  The equivalent disclosure for the prior years are as follows:            
  At 1 January 2010   242     3,778     (279  128     (740  6,508    73    9,710  
  Group profit for the financial year   -     -     -    -     -    432    7    439  
  Other comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     514    (19  5    500  
  Total comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     514    413    12    939  
 29    Issue of share capital (net of expenses)   3     137     -    -     -    -    -    140  
 8    Share-based payment expense            
  - share option schemes   -     -     -    9     -    -    -    9  
  - Performance Share Plan (PSP)   -     -     -    10     -    -    -    10  
 11    Tax relating to share-based payment expense   -     -     -    -     -    (2  -    (2
  Treasury/own shares reissued   -     -     80    -     -    (80  -    -  
  Share option exercises   -     -     -    -     -    45    -    45  
 12    Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends)   -     -     -    -     -    (438  (6  (444
 31    Non-controlling interests arising on acquisition of subsidiaries   -     -     -    -     -    -    6    6  
  Acquisition of non-controlling interests   -     -     -    -     -    -    (2  (2
  At 31 December 2010   245     3,915     (199  147     (226  6,446    83    10,411  
  At 1 January 2009   187     2,448     (378  87     (644  6,387    70    8,157  
  Group profit for the financial year   -     -     -    -     -    592    6    598  
  Other comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     (96  (34  -    (130
  Total comprehensive income   -     -     -    -     (96  558    6    468  
 29    Issue of share capital (net of expenses)   55     1,330     -    -     -    -    -    1,385  
 8    Share-based payment expense            
  - share option schemes   -     -     -    18     -    -    -    18  
  - Performance Share Plan (PSP)   -     -     -    10     -    -    -    10  
  Reclassification of Performance Share Plan expense   -     -     (13  13     -    -    -    -  
 11    Tax relating to share-based payment expense   -     -     -    -     -    3    -    3  
  Treasury/own shares re-issued   -     -     114    -     -    (114  -    -  
 29    Shares acquired by Employee Benefit Trust (own shares)   -     -     (2  -     -    -    -    (2
  Share option exercises   -     -     -    -     -    60    -    60  
 12    Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends)   -     -     -    -     -    (386  (7  (393
 31    Non-controlling interests arising on acquisition of subsidiaries   -     -     -    -     -    -    4    4  
  At 31 December 2009   242     3,778     (279  128     (740  6,508    73    9,710  
   Attributable to the equity holders of the Company     
    

Issued

share

capital

€m

 

Share

premium

account

€m

 

Treasury

Shares/

own

shares

€m

 

Other

reserves

€m

 

Foreign

currency

translation

reserve
€m

 

Retained

income

€m

 

Non-

controlling

interests

€m

 

Total

equity

€m

 
 Notes  
At 1 January 2014 252   4,219   (118 197   (542 5,654   24   9,686  
Group profit for the financial year -   -   -   -   -   582   2   584  
Other comprehensive income -   -   -   -   599   (351 -   248  
Total comprehensive income -   -   -   -   599   231   2   832  
 28  Issue of share capital (net of expenses) 2   105   -   -   -   -   -   107  
 7  Share-based payment expense
- share option schemes -   -   -   1   -   -   -   1  
- Performance Share Plans/Restricted Share Plan -   -   -   15   -   -   -   15  
 28  Treasury/own shares reissued -   -   42   -   -   (42 -   -  
Share option exercises -   -   -   -   -   22   -   22  
 11  Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends) -   -   -   -   -   (460 (4 (464
Acquisition of non-controlling interests -   -   -   -   -   -   (1 (1
At 31 December 2014 254   4,324   (76 213   57   5,405   21   10,198  
for the financial year ended 31 December 2013
At 1 January 2013 250   4,133   (146 182   (169 6,303   36   10,589  
Group loss for the financial year -   -   -   -   -   (296 1   (295
Other comprehensive income -   -   -   -   (373 117   -   (256
Total comprehensive income -   -   -   -   (373 (179 1   (551
 28  Issue of share capital (net of expenses) 2   86   -   -   -   -   -   88  
 7  Share-based payment expense
- share option schemes -   -   -   1   -   -   -   1  
- Performance Share Plans/Restricted Share Plan -   -   -   14   -   -   -   14  
 28  Treasury/own shares reissued -   -   34   -   -   (34 -   -  
 28  Shares acquired by Employee Benefit Trust (own shares) -   -   (6 -   -   -   -   (6
Share option exercises -   -   -   -   -   19   -   19  
 11  Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends) -   -   -   -   -   (455 (1 (456
 30  Non-controlling interests arising on acquisition of subsidiaries -   -   -   -   -   -   1   1  
Acquisition of non-controlling interests -   -   -   -   -   -   (13 (13
At 31 December 2013 252   4,219   (118 197   (542 5,654   24   9,686  
for the financial year ended 31 December 2012
At 1 January 2012 248   4,047   (183 168   (119 6,358   41   10,560  
Group profit for the financial year -   -   -   -   -   538   2   540  
Other comprehensive income -   -   -   -   (50 (122 (1 (173
Total comprehensive income -   -   -   -   (50 416   1   367  
 28  Issue of share capital (net of expenses) 2   86   -   -   -   -   -   88  
 7  Share-based payment expense
- Performance Share Plans (PSP) -   -   -   14   -   -   -   14  
Treasury/own shares reissued -   -   37   -   -   (37 -   -  
Share option exercises -   -   -   -   -   16   -   16  
 11  Dividends (including shares issued in lieu of dividends) -   -   -   -   -   (450 (4 (454
Acquisition of non-controlling interests -   -   -   -   -   -   (2 (2
At 31 December 2012 250   4,133   (146 182   (169 6,303   36   10,589  

 

102    CRHLOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      137

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

for the financial year ended 31 December 20112014

 

         2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 
 Notes           
 Cash flows from operating activities        
 Profit before tax     711     534     732  
 9   Finance costs (net)     257     247     297  
 10   Group share of associates’ profit after tax     (42   (28   (48
 5   Profit on disposals     (55   (55   (26
 Group operating profit     871     698     955  
 3   Depreciation charge (including impairments)     742     786     794  
 3   Amortisation of intangible assets (including impairments)     43     131     54  
 8   Share-based payment expense     21     19     28  
 Other movements     (109   (35   (37
 20   Net movement on working capital and provisions     (211   142     740  
 Cash generated from operations     1,357     1,741     2,534  
 Interest paid (including finance leases)     (239   (283   (294
 25   Decrease in liquid investments     4     33     65  
 Corporation tax paid     (96   (100   (104
 Net cash inflow from operating activities     1,026     1,391     2,201  
 Cash flows from investing activities        
 5   Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)     442     188     103  
 Interest received     32     35     31  
 Dividends received from associates     20     51     38  
 14   Purchase of property, plant and equipment     (576   (466   (532
 31   Acquisition of subsidiaries and joint ventures (net of cash acquired)     (507   (436   (174
 16   Other investments and advances     (24   (67   (244
 20   Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid     (21   (27   (37
 20   Decrease/(increase) in finance-related receivables     -     115     (115
 Net cash outflow from investing activities     (634   (607   (930
 Cash flows from financing activities        
 29   Proceeds from issue of shares (net)     -     -     1,237  
 Proceeds from exercise of share options     6     45     60  
 Acquisition of non-controlling interests     (11   (2   -  
 Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases     101     566     757  
 Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments     (63   82     16  
 Treasury/own shares purchased     -     -     (2
 Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases     (552   (885   (2,501
 12   Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company     (310   (298   (238
 12   Dividends paid to non-controlling interests     (9   (6   (7
 Net cash outflow from financing activities     (838   (498   (678
 (Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents     (446   286     593  
 Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents        
 25   Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January     1,730     1,372     799  
 Translation adjustment     11     72     (20
 (Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents     (446   286     593  
 25   Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December     1,295     1,730     1,372  

CRH    103


Consolidated Financial Statements

        

2014

€m

  

2013

m

  

2012

m

 
 Notes        
  Cash flows from operating activities    
  Profit/(loss) before tax   761    (215  646  
 8    Finance costs (net)   288    297    305  
 9    Share of equity accounted investments’ result   (55  44    84  
 4    Profit on disposals   (77  (26  (230
  Group operating profit   917    100    805  
 2    Depreciation charge   631    671    686  
 2    Amortisation of intangible assets   44    54    44  
 2    Impairment charge   49    650    28  
 7    Share-based payment expense   16    15    14  
  Other (primarily pension payments)   (66  (96  (152
 19    Net movement on working capital and provisions   35    77    (58
  Cash generated from operations   1,626    1,471    1,367  
  Interest paid (including finance leases)   (262  (269  (258
  Corporation tax paid   (127  (110  (124
  Net cash inflow from operating activities   1,237    1,092    985  
  Cash flows from investing activities    
 4    Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)   345    122    782  
  Interest received   8    13    16  
  Dividends received from equity accounted investments   30    33    35  
 13    Purchase of property, plant and equipment   (435  (497  (544
 30    Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired)   (151  (336  (418
 15    Other investments and advances   (3  (78  (56
 19    Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid   (26  (105  (30
  Net cash outflow from investing activities   (232  (848  (215
  Cash flows from financing activities    
  Proceeds from exercise of share options   22    19    16  
  Acquisition of non-controlling interests   (1  (13  (2
  Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   901    1,491    487  
  Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments   (11  64    13  
 28    Treasury/own shares purchased   -    (6  -  
  Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   (934  (586  (394
 11    Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company   (353  (367  (362
 11    Dividends paid to non-controlling interests   (4  (1  (4
  Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities   (380  601    (246
  Increase in cash and cash equivalents   625    845    524  
  Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents    
  Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January   2,540    1,747    1,246  
  Translation adjustment   130    (52  (23
  Increase in cash and cash equivalents   625    845    524  
 22    Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December           3,295            2,540            1,747  

 

138      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Accounting Policies (including

(including key accounting estimates and assumptions)

Statement

Basis of CompliancePreparation

The Consolidated Financial Statements of CRH plc have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issuedadopted by the International Accounting Standards Board.

CRH plc, the Parent Company, is a publicly traded limited company incorporated and domiciled in the Republic of Ireland.

Basis of Preparation

The Consolidated Financial Statements, which are presented in euro millions, have been prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by the measurement at fair value of share-based payments, retirement benefit obligations and certain financial assets and liabilities including derivative financial instruments.

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently by all the Group’s subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates to all periods presented in these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain prior year disclosures have been amended to conform to current year presentation. €161 million and €143 million has been reclassified from cost of sales to operating expenses in 2013 and 2012 respectively to align with current year presentation.

Adoption of IFRS and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations

IFRS and IFRIC interpretations

(i)The following standards and amendments have been adopted during the financial year

The Group has adopted the following new and revised IFRS and IFRIC interpretations in respect of the 2011 year-end:

IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (amendment)effective 1 January 2011

 

  

Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments toIAS 32Financial Instruments: Presentation - Classification of Rights Issue (amendment)Presentation) effective 1 February 2010

 

  

Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets(Amendments toIFRIC 14IAS 36 PrepaymentsImpairment of a Minimum Funding Requirement (amendment)Assets)effective 1 January 2011

 

  

Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (Amendments toIFRIC 19IAS 39 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity InstrumentsInstruments: Recognition and Measurement) effective 1 July 2010

 

Improvements to IFRS (May 2010) - amendments applying in respect of the 2011 financial year-end

IFRIC 21Levies

The application of the above standards and interpretations did not result in material changes into the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements.results or financial position of the Group.

(ii) IFRS and IFRICinterpretations effectivebeing adopted in respect of the CRH 2012 financial year-endsubsequent years

IFRS 15Revenue from Contracts with Customers will replace IAS 18Revenue, IAS 11Construction Contractsand related interpretations. The Group has not applied the following standards and interpretations that have been issued but are not yet effective:

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (amendment) effective 1 July 2011

IAS 12 Income Taxes (amendment) - Deferred Taxes: Recovery of Underlying Assetseffective 1 January 2012

The standards addressed above will be applied for the purposes of the Group Consolidated Financial Statements with effect from the dates listed and their applicationnew standard is not anticipated to have a material impact.

IFRS and IFRIC interpretations effective subsequent to the CRH 2012 financial year-end:

IAS 1Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income -amendments to IAS 1 effective 1 July 2012

The amendment to IAS 1 changes the grouping of items presented in Other Comprehensive Income. This change in presentation is not anticipated to have a significant effect on the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements and will be adopted from 1 July 2012.

104    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements,IAS 27Separate Financial Statementseffective 1 January 2013

IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group. The Group has yet to assess fully IFRS 10’s impact on its operations and will adopt itapplicable from 1 January 2013.

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements,IAS 28Investments in Associates and Joint Ventureseffective 1 January 2013

2017 and is subject to EU endorsement. IFRS 11 replaces IAS 31Interests15 provides a new five step model to be applied to revenue arising from contracts with customers. The principles in Joint Ventures. The Group currently uses proportionate consolidationIFRS 15 provide a more structured approach to account for its sharemeasuring and recognising revenue and may impact the timing and amount of its joint ventures’ income and expenses, assets and liabilities. Under the revised standard the option to account for joint ventures (as defined under IFRS 11) using proportionate consolidation has been removed and these arrangements will be accounted for using equity accounting.revenue recognised from contracts with customers. The Group is in the process ofcurrently assessing the impact of this standard; however we do not envisage that it will have any effectIFRS 15.

IFRS 9Financial Instruments reflects the final phase of the IASB’s work on the Group profit. The Group will adopt IFRS 11 from 1 January 2013.

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entitieseffective 1 January 2013

IFRS 12 includes the disclosure requirements for all formsreplacement of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehiclesIAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and other off balance sheet vehicles. The Group will adopt IFRS 12 from 1 January 2013.

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurementeffective 1 January 2013

IFRS 13 provides guidance on how fair value accounting should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within IFRSs. The Group has yetMeasurementand applies to assess IFRS 13’s full impact and will adopt the Standard from 1 January 2013.

IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mineeffective 1 January 2013

IFRIC 20 provides guidance on the accounting treatment of stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a surface mine used to extract mineral resources. The Group has yet to assess the full impact of this interpretation and will adopt IFRIC 20 from 1 January 2013.

IAS 19Employee benefits (revised)effective 1 January 2013

IAS 19 was amended in June 2011. Under the revised standard interest cost and expected return on plan assets will be replaced with a net amount that is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability (asset). There are also additional disclosure requirements relating to the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to changes in each significant actuarial assumption. The Group has yet to assess the full impact of the amendment but as the Group will no longer be permitted to take advanced credit for expected asset returns, this will likely result in an increase in the 2013 net pension expense. The Group will apply IAS 19 (revised) from 1 January 2013.

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Classification and Measurementeffective 1 January 2015

IFRS 9 addresses the classification and measurement of financial instruments (Phase 1). The Board’s work onassets and liabilities as defined in IAS 39, impairment, and the other phases is ongoing and includes impairmentapplication of financial instruments and hedge accounting. IFRS 9 is effective from 1 January 2018 and is awaiting EU endorsement. The adoption ofGroup is currently assessing the initial phasesimpact of IFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities; which will be quantified in conjunction with the other phases when issued.9.

There are no other IFRSsIFRS or IFRIC interpretations that are not yet effective subsequent to the CRH 2014 financial year-end that would be expected to have a material impact on the results or financial position of the Group.

Key Accounting Policies which involve Estimates, Assumptions and Judgements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make certain estimates, assumptions and judgements that affect the application of accounting policies and the

reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses at the end of the reporting period.expenses. Management

CRH    105


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

believes that the estimates, assumptions and judgements upon which it relies are reasonable based on the information available to it at the time that those estimates, assumptions and judgements are made. In some cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by IFRS and does not require management’s judgement in its application.

Management consider that their use of estimates, assumptions and judgements in the application of the Group’s accounting policies are inter-relatedinterrelated and therefore discuss them together below. The critical accounting policies which involve significant estimates, or assumptions or judgements, the actual outcome of which could have a material impact on the Group’s results and financial position outlined below, are as follows:

Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill – Notes 13 and 14

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and goodwill

The carrying values of items of property, plant and equipment are reviewed for indicators of impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. Goodwill is subject to impairment testing on an annual basis and at any time during the year if an indicator of impairment is considered to exist. A decision to dispose of a business unit represents one such indicator and in these circumstances the recoverable amount is assessed on a fair value less costs of disposal basis. In the year in which a business combination is effected and where some or all of the goodwill allocated to a particular cash-generating unit arose in respect of that combination, the cash-generating unit is tested for impairment prior to the end of the relevant annual period.

Property, plant and equipment assets are reviewed for potential impairment by applying a series of external and internal indicators specific to the assets under consideration; these indicators encompass macroeconomic issues including the inherent cyclicality of the building materials sector, actual obsolescence or physical damage, a deterioration in forecast performance in the internal reporting cycle and restructuring and rationalisation programmes.

Where the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount (being the greater of fair value less costs of disposal and value-in-use), an impairment loss is recognised by writing down the assets to their recoverable amount. In assessing value-in-use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. The estimates of future cash flows exclude cash inflows or outflows attributable to financing activities and income tax. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined by reference to the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses arising in respect of goodwill are not reversed once recognised.

Goodwill relating to associates and joint ventures is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is neither amortised nor individually tested for impairment. Where indicators of impairment of an investment arise in accordance with the requirements of IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, the carrying amount is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount.

The impairment testing process requires management to make significant judgements and estimates regarding the future cash flows expected to be generated by the use of and, if applicable, the eventual disposal of, long-lived assets and goodwill as well as other factors to determine the fair value of the assets. Management periodically evaluates and updates the estimates based on the conditions which influence these variables. A detailed discussion of the impairment methodology applied and key assumptions used by the Group in the context of long-lived assets and goodwill is provided in note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

LOGO

CRH      139


LOGO

Accounting Policies|continued

The assumptions and conditions for determining impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill reflect management’s best assumptions and estimates, but these items involve inherent uncertainties described above, many of which are not under management’s control. As a result, the accounting for such items could result in different estimates or amounts if management used different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future accounting periods.

Retirement benefit obligations – Note 27

Costs arising in respect of the Group’s defined contribution pension schemes are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in the period in which they are incurred. The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions in the event that the fund does not hold sufficient assets to meet its benefit commitments.

The liabilities and costs associated with the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes (both funded and unfunded) are assessed on the basis of the projected unit credit method by professionally qualified actuaries and are arrived at using actuarial assumptions based on market expectations at the balance sheet date. The discount rates employed in determining the present value of the schemes’ liabilities are determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on high-quality corporate bonds of a currency and term consistent with the currency and term of the associated post-employment benefit obligations.

The net surplus or deficit arising on the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes, together with the liabilities associated with the unfunded schemes, are shown either within non-current assets or non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The deferred tax impact of pension scheme surpluses and deficits is disclosed separately within deferred tax assets or liabilities as appropriate. Remeasurements, comprising of actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest), are recognised immediately in the Consolidated Balance Sheet with a corresponding debit or credit to retained earnings through other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Remeasurements are not reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods.

The defined benefit pension asset or liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet comprises the total for each plan of the present value of the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies. Fair value is based on market price information and, in the case of published securities, it is the published bid price. The value of any defined benefit asset is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan and reductions in the future contributions to the plan.

The Group’s obligation in respect of post-employment healthcare and life assurance benefits represents the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for service in the current and prior periods. The obligation is computed on the basis of the projected unit credit method and is discounted to present value using a discount rate equating to the market yield at the balance sheet date on high-quality corporate bonds of a currency and term consistent with the currency and estimated term of the post-employment obligations.

Assumptions

The assumptions underlying the actuarial valuations from which the amounts recognised in the Consolidated Financial Statements are determined (including discount rates, rates of increase in future compensation levels, mortality rates and healthcare cost trend rates) are updated annually based on current economic conditions and for any relevant changes to the terms and conditions of the pension and post-retirement plans. These assumptions can be affected by (i) for the discount rate, changes in the rates of return on high-quality corporate bonds; (ii) for future compensation levels, future labour market conditions and (iii) for healthcare cost trend rates, the rate of medical cost inflation in the

relevant regions. The weighted average actuarial assumptions used and sensitivity analysis in relation to the significant assumptions employed in the determination of pension and other post-retirement liabilities are contained in note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the obligations and expenses recognised in future accounting periods. The assets and liabilities of defined benefit pension schemes may exhibit significant period-on-period volatility attributable primarily to changes in bond yields and longevity. In addition to future service contributions, significant cash contributions may be required to remediate past service deficits.

Provisions for liabilities - Note 2625

A provision is recognised when the Group has a present obligation (either legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where the Group anticipates that a provision will be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset only when it is virtually certain that the reimbursement will arise. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the Consolidated Income Statement net of any reimbursement. Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognised as an interest expense. Provisions arising on business combination activity are recognised only to the extent that they would have qualified for recognition in the financial statements of the acquiree prior to acquisition. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

Rationalisation and redundancy provisions

Provisions for rationalisation and redundancy are established when a detailed restructuring plan has been drawn up, resolved upon by the responsible decision-making level of management and communicated to the employees who are affected by the plan. These provisions are recognised at the present value of future disbursements and cover only expenses that arise directly from restructuring measures and are necessary for restructuring andrestructuring; these provisions exclude costs related to future business operations. Restructuring measures may include the sale or termination of business units, site closures and relocation of business activities, changes in management structure or a fundamental reorganisation of departments or business units.

Environmental and remediation provisions

The measurement of environmental and remediation provisions is based on an evaluation of currently available facts with respect to each individual site and considers factors such as existing technology, currently enacted laws and regulations and prior experience in remediation of sites. Inherent uncertainties exist in such evaluations primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, the protracted length of the clean-up periods and evolving technologies. The environmental and remediation liabilities provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the information available to management at the time of determination of the liability and are adjusted periodically as remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Due to the inherent uncertainties described above, many of which are not under management’s control, the accounting for such items could result in different amounts if management used different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future accounting periods.

Legal contingencies

The status of each significant claim and legal proceeding in which the Group is involved is reviewed by management on a periodic basis and the Group’s potential financial exposure is assessed. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable, and the amount can be estimated, a liability is recognised for the estimated loss. Because of the uncertainties inherent in such matters, the related provisions are based on

140      CRH


the best information available at the time; the issues taken into account by management and factored into the assessment of legal contingencies include, as applicable, the status of settlement negotiations, interpretations of contractual obligations, prior experience with similar contingencies/claims, the availability of insurance to protect against the downside exposure and advice obtained from legal counsel and other third

106    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

parties. As additional information becomes available on pending claims, the potential liability is reassessed and revisions are made to the amounts accrued where appropriate. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on the results of operations and financial position of the Group.

Retirement benefit obligations - Note 28

Costs arising in respect of the Group’s defined contribution pension schemes are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in the period in which they are incurred. The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions in the event that the fund does not hold sufficient assets to meet its benefit commitments.

The liabilities and costs associated with the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes (both funded and unfunded) are assessed on the basis of the projected unit credit method by professionally qualified actuaries and are arrived at using actuarial assumptions based on market expectations at the balance sheet date. The discount rates employed in determining the present value of the schemes’ liabilities are determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on high-quality corporate bonds of a currency and term consistent with the currency and term of the associated post-employment benefit obligations.

When the benefits of a defined benefit scheme are improved, the portion of the increased benefit relating to past service by employees is recognised as an expense in the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the enhanced benefits vest immediately, the related expense is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

The net surplus or deficit arising on the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes, together with the liabilities associated with the unfunded schemes, are shown either within non-current assets or non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The deferred tax impact of pension scheme surpluses and deficits is disclosed separately within deferred tax assets or liabilities as appropriate. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised immediately in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

The defined benefit pension asset or liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet comprises the total for each plan of the present value of the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies. Fair value is based on market price information and in the case of published securities it is the published bid price. The value of any defined benefit asset is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan and reductions in the future contributions to the plan.

The Group’s obligation in respect of post-employment healthcare and life assurance benefits represents the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for service in the current and prior periods. The obligation is computed on the basis of the projected unit credit method and is discounted to present value using a discount rate equating to the market yield at the balance sheet date on high-quality corporate bonds of a currency and term consistent with the currency and estimated term of the post-employment obligations.

Assumptions

The assumptions underlying the actuarial valuations from which the amounts recognised in the Consolidated Financial Statements are determined (including discount rates, expected return on plan assets, rate of increase in future compensation levels, mortality rates and healthcare cost trend rates) are updated annually based on current economic conditions and for any relevant changes to the terms and conditions of the pension and post-retirement plans. These assumptions can be affected by (i) for the discount rate, changes in the rates of return on high-quality corporate bonds; (ii) for the expected return on plan assets, changes in the pension plans’ strategic asset allocations to various investment types or to long-term return trend rates in the capital markets in which the pension fund assets are invested; (iii) for future compensation levels, future labour market conditions and (iv) for healthcare cost trend rates, the rate of medical cost inflation in the relevant regions. The weighted average actuarial assumptions used and sensitivity analysis in relation to the discount rates employed in the determination of pension and other post-retirement liabilities are contained in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRH    107


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the obligations and expenses recognised in future accounting periods.

Taxation - current and deferred - Notes 1110 and 2726

Current tax represents the expected tax payable (or recoverable) on the taxable profit for the year using tax rates enacted for the period. Any interest or penalties arising are included within current tax. Where items are accounted for outside of profit or loss, the related income tax is recognised either in other comprehensive income or directly in equity as appropriate.

Deferred tax is recognised using the liability method on temporary differences arising at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements. However, deferred tax liabilities are not recognised if they arise from the initial recognition of goodwill; in addition, deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. NoFor the most part, no provision has been made for temporary differences applicable to investments in subsidiaries and interests in joint ventures as the Group is in a position to control the timing of reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. However, a temporary difference has been recognised to the extent that specific assets have been identified for sale or where there is a specific intention to unwind the temporary difference in the foreseeable future. Due to the absence of control in the context of associates (significant influence only), deferred tax liabilities are recognised where appropriate in respect of CRH’s investments in these entities on the basis that the exercise of significant influence would not necessarily prevent earnings being remitted by other shareholders in the undertaking.

Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not subject to discounting.

Deferred tax assets are recognised in respect of all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. The carrying amounts of deferred tax assets are subject to review at each balance sheet date and are reduced to the extent that future taxable profits are considered to be inadequate to allow all or part of any deferred tax asset to be utilised.

The Group’s income tax charge is based on reported profit and expected statutory tax rates, which reflect various allowances and reliefs and tax planning opportunities available to the Group in the multiple tax jurisdictions in which it operates. The determination of the Group’s provision for income tax requires certain judgements and estimates in relation to matters where the ultimate tax outcome may not be certain. The recognition or non-recognition of deferred tax assets as appropriate also requires judgement as it involves an assessment of the future recoverability of those assets. In addition, the Group is subject to tax audits which can involve complex issues that could require extended periods for resolution. Although management believes that the estimates included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and its tax return positions are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these

matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the Group’s historical income tax provisions and accruals. Any such differences could have a material impact on the income tax provision and profit for the period in which such a determination is made.

Property, plant and equipment - Note 1413

The Group’s accounting policy for property, plant and equipment is considered critical because the carrying value of8,936 €7,422 million at 31 December 20112014 represents a significant portion (42%(34%) of total assets at that date. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairments except for certain items that had been revalued to fair value prior to the date of transition to IFRS (1 January 2004).

Repair and maintenance expenditure is included in an asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repair and maintenance expenditure is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement during the financial period in which it is incurred.

108    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Borrowing costs incurred in the construction of major assets which take a substantial period of time to complete are capitalised in the financial period in which they are incurred.

In the application of the Group’s accounting policy, judgement is exercised by management in the determination of residual values and useful lives. Depreciation and depletion is calculated to write off the book value of each item of property, plant and equipment over its useful economic life on a straight-line basis at the following rates:

Land and buildings: The book value of mineral-bearing land, less an estimate of its residual value, is depleted over the period of the mineral extraction in the proportion which production for the year bears to the latest estimates of proven and probable mineral reserves. Land other than mineral-bearing land is not depreciated. In general, buildings are depreciated at 2.5% per annum (“p.a.”).

Plant and machinery:These are depreciated at rates ranging from 3.3% p.a. to 20% p.a. depending on the type of asset.

Transport: On Plant and machinery includes transport which is, on average, transport equipment is depreciated at 20% p.a.

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the depreciation period or method as appropriate on a prospective basis.

Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill – Notes 14 and 15

Impairment For the Group’s accounting policy on impairment of property, plant and equipment and goodwill

The carrying values of items of property, plant and equipment are reviewed for indicators ofplease see impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. Goodwill is subject to impairment testing on an annual basis and at any time during the year if an indicator of impairment is considered to exist. In the year in which a business combination is effected and where some or all of the goodwill allocated to a particular cash-generating unit arose in respect of that combination, the cash-generating unit is tested for impairment prior to the end of the relevant annual period.

Property, plant and equipment assets are reviewed for potential impairment by applying a series of external and internal indicators specific to the assets under consideration; these indicators encompass macroeconomic issues including the inherent cyclicality of the building materials sector, actual obsolescence or physical damage, a deterioration in forecast performance in the internal reporting cycle and restructuring and rationalisation programmes.

Where the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount (being the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use), an impairment loss is recognised by writing down the assets to their recoverable amount. In assessing value-in-use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. The estimates of future cash flows exclude cash inflows or outflows attributable to financing activities and income tax. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined by reference to the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses arising in respect of goodwill are not reversed once recognised.

Goodwill relating to associates is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is neither amortised nor individually tested for impairment. Where indicators of impairment of an investment arise in accordance with the requirements of IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, the carrying amount is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount.

The impairment testing process requires management to make significant judgements and estimates regarding the future cash flows expected to be generated by the use of and, if applicable, the eventual disposal of long-lived assets and goodwill as well as other factors to determine the fair value of the assets. Management periodically evaluates and updates the estimates based on the conditions which influence these variables. Agoodwill.

CRH    109


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

detailed discussion of the impairment methodology applied and key assumptions used by the Group in the context of long-lived assets and goodwill is provided in Notes 14 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The assumptions and conditions for determining impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill reflect management’s best assumptions and estimates, but these items involve inherent uncertainties described above, many of which are not under management’s control. As a result, the accounting for such items could result in different estimates or amounts if management used different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future accounting periods.

Other Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of the Parent Company and all subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, drawn up to 31 December each year. The financial year-ends of the Group’s subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are co-terminous.

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The financial statements of subsidiariesGroup controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated Financial Statementsfully consolidated from the date on which control overis transferred to the operating and financial decisions is obtained and cease to be consolidatedGroup. They are deconsolidated from the date on which the Group loses control. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered in determining the existence or otherwise of control.control ceases. A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary without a change ofin control is accounted for as an equity transaction.

Non-controlling interests represent the portion of the equity of a subsidiary not attributable either directly or indirectly to the Parent Company and are presented separately in the Consolidated Income Statement and within equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, distinguished from Parent

LOGO

CRH      141


LOGO

Accounting Policies|continued

Company shareholders’ equity. Acquisitions of non-controlling interests are accounted for as transactions with equity holders in their capacity as equity holders and therefore no goodwill is recognised as a result of such transactions. On an acquisition by acquisition basis, the Group recognises any non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets.

Joint ventures - Note 2

The Group’s share of results and net assets of joint ventures (jointly controlled entities which are entitiesInvestments in which the Group holds an interest on a long-term basis and which are jointly controlled by the Group and one or more other venturers under a contractual arrangement) are accounted for on the basis of proportionate consolidation from the date on which the contractual agreements stipulating joint control are finalised and are derecognised when joint control ceases. The Group combines its share of the joint ventures’ individual income and expenses, assets and liabilities and cash flows on a line-by-line basis with similar items in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans to joint ventures (after proportionate elimination) are classified as loans and receivables within financial assets and are recorded at amortised cost.

Associates - Note 10

Entities other than subsidiariesassociates and joint ventures in– Notes 9 and 15

An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of an entity, but is not control or joint control over those policies.

A joint venture is a participating interest,type of joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the joint venture. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of the arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.

The Group’s investments in its associates and over whose operating and financial policies the Group is in a position to exercise significant influence,joint ventures are accounted for as associates using the equity method and are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date on which significant influenceinfluence/joint control is deemed to arise until the date on which such influencesignificant influence/joint control ceases to exist. Underexist or when the equity method, theinterest becomes classified as an asset held for sale.

The Consolidated Income Statement reflects the Group’s share of profit after tax of the related associates.associates and joint ventures. Investments in associates and joint ventures are carried in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at cost, adjusted in respect of post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets, less any impairment in value. Loans advanced to equity accounted investments that have the characteristics of equity financing are also included in the investment held on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. If necessary, impairment losses on the carrying amount of an investment are reported within the Group’s share of associates’ profit after taxequity accounted investments’ results in the Consolidated Income Statement. If the Group’s share of losses exceeds the

110    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

carrying amount of an associate or joint venture, the carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has incurred obligations in respect of the associate.associate or joint venture.

Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions, income and expenses, and any unrealised gains or losses arising from such transactions, are eliminated in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with joint ventures and associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same manner as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment in the Group’s interest in the entity.

Revenue recognition

Revenue represents the value of goods and services supplied and is net of trade discounts and value added tax/sales tax. Other than in the case of construction contracts, revenue is recognised to the extent that revenue and related costs incurred or to be incurred are subject to reliable measurement, that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the Group and that the significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyer, usually on delivery of the goods.

Construction contracts

The Group engages primarily in the performance of fixed price contracts, as opposed to cost plus contracts, andcontracts. Contract costs are recognised as incurred.

When the outcome of a contract can be estimated reliably the Group recognises revenue in accordance with the percentage-of-completion method, with themethod. The completion percentage being computedis generally by reference tomeasured based on the proportion thatof contract costs incurred at the balance sheet date bearrelative to the total estimated costs of the contract.

Contract costs are recognised as incurred. When the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably and it is probable that the contract will be profitable, contract revenue is recognised over the period of the contract. When the outcome of a construction contract cannot be estimated reliably, contract revenue is recognised only to the extent of contract costs incurred where it is probable that these costs will be recoverable.

When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognised immediately as an expense. Revenue and/or costs in respect of variations or contracts claims and incentive payments, to the extent that they arise, are recognised when it is probable that the amount, which can be measured reliably, will be recovered from/paid to the customer.

If circumstances arise that may change the original estimates of revenues, costs or extent of progress towards completion, estimates are revised. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in revenue or costs and are reflected in income in the period in which the circumstances that give rise to the revision became known by management.

Segment reporting - Note 1

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal organisational and management structure and the internal reporting information provided to the Chief Operating Decision-Maker who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments.

Assets and liabilities held for sale – Note 4

Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification as held for sale.

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are not depreciated or amortised once classified as held for sale. The Group ceases to use the equity method of accounting from the date on which an interest in a joint venture or associate becomes held for sale. Non-current assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with those assets are presented separately as current items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Share-based payments - Note 87

The Group operates both Share Option Schemes and a Performance Share Plan.number of equity-settled share-based payment plans. Its policy in relation to the granting of share options and the granting of awards under the Performance Share Planthese plans, together with the nature of the underlying market and non-market performance and other vesting conditions, are addressed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 86 to 89.page 112. The Group’s employee share optionsGroup has no exposure in respect of cash-settled share-based payment transactions and shares awarded under the Performance Share Plan are equity-settled share-based payments as defined in IFRS 2 Share-Based Payment.payment transactions with cash alternatives.

Share options

For share option awards, the Group measures the services received and the corresponding increase in equity at fair value at the grant date using the trinomial model (a lattice option-pricing model in accordance with IFRS 2).

CRH    111


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair value is determined on the basis that the services to be rendered by employees as consideration for the granting of share options will be received over the vesting period, which is assessed as at the grant date. The share options granted by the Company are at market value at date of grant and are not subject to market-based vesting conditions within the meaning of IFRS 2.2Share-based Payment.

The cost is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled. The cumulative expense recognised at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The Consolidated Income Statement expense/credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised at the beginning and end of that period. The cumulative charge to the Consolidated Income Statement is reversed only where the performance condition is not met or where an employee in receipt of share options leaves service prior to completion of the expected vesting period and those options forfeit in consequence.

142      CRH


No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for share-based payments where vesting is conditional upon a non-vesting condition which is treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not it is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied.

Where an award is cancelled, it is treated as if it is vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. This includes any award where non-vesting conditions within the control of either the Company or the employee are not met. All cancellations of awards are treated equally.

The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium when the options are exercised.

The dilutive effect of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the determination of diluted earnings per share.

To the extent that the Group receives a tax deduction relating to the services paid in shares, deferred tax in respect of share options is provided on the basis of the difference between the market price of the underlying equity as at the date of the financial statements and the exercise price of the option; where the amount of any tax deduction (or estimated future tax deduction) exceeds the amount of the related cumulative remuneration expense, the current or deferred tax associated with the excess is recognised directly in equity.

The Group has no exposure in respect of cash-settled share-based payment transactions and share-based payment transactions with cash alternatives.

Awards under the Performance Share PlanPlans

The fair value of shares awardedAll awards granted under the 2006 Performance Share Plan is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation technique and is expensed in75% of the Consolidated Income Statement overawards granted under the vesting period. The2014 Performance Share Plan contains inter aliaare subject to a total shareholder return-based (and hence market-based) vesting condition; accordingly,condition. Accordingly, the fair value assigned to the related equity instruments at the grant date is adjusted so as to reflect the anticipated likelihood as at the grant date of achieving the market-based vesting condition. Awards are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied.

The remaining 25% of awards granted under the 2014 Performance Share Plan are subject to a cumulative cash flow target (non-market based) vesting condition. The fair value of the awards is calculated as the market price of the shares at the date of grant. No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest. At the balance sheet date the estimate of the level of vesting is reviewed and any adjustment necessary is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Awards under the Restricted Share Plan

The fair value of shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan is calculated as the market price of the shares at the date of grant reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be paid over the vesting period.

Information on the models used by the Group to estimate the fair value of awards granted is included in note 7.

Business combinations - Note 3130

The Group applies the acquisition method in accounting for business combinations. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred (excluding amounts relating to the settlement of pre-existing relationships), the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and, in a business combination achieved in stages, the acquisition-date fair value of the acquirer’s previously-held equity interest in the acquiree. Transaction costs that the Group incurs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.

112    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

To the extent that settlement of all or any part of consideration for a business combination is deferred, the fair value of the deferred component is determined through discounting the amounts payable to their present value at the date of exchange. The discount component is unwound as an interest charge in the Consolidated Income Statement over the life of the obligation. Where a business combination agreement provides for an adjustment toAny contingent consideration is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date and included in the cost of the combinationacquisition. The fair value of contingent on future events, the amount of the adjustment is included in the costconsideration at the acquisition date is arrived at fairthrough

discounting the expected payment (based on scenario modelling) to present value. In general, in order for contingent consideration to become payable, pre-defined profit and/or profit/net asset ratios must be exceeded. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration will be recognised in profit or loss unless the contingent consideration is classified as equity, in which case it is not remeasured and settlement is accounted for within equity.

The assets and liabilities (and contingent liabilities, if relevant) arising on business combination activity are measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Contingent liabilities assumed in business combination activity are recognised as of the acquisition date, where such contingent liabilities are present obligations arising from past events and their fair value can be measured reliably. In the case of a business combination achieved in stages, the acquisition-date fair value of the acquirer’s previously-held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value as at the acquisition date through profit or loss. When the initial accounting for a business combination is determined provisionally, any adjustments to the provisional values allocated to the consideration, identifiable assets andor liabilities (and contingent liabilities, if relevant) are made within the measurement period, a period of no more than one year from the acquisition date.

Goodwill - Note 1514

Goodwill arising on a business combination is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the net identifiable assets and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition and relates to the future economic benefits arising from assets which are not capable of being individually identified and separately recognised. Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. If the cost of the acquisition is lower than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the identification and measurement of the related assets and liabilities and contingent liabilities are revisited and the cost is reassessed with any remaining balance recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Goodwill applicable to jointly controlled entities is accounted for on the basis of proportionate consolidation and is therefore included in the goodwill caption in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, net of any impairment. The carrying amount of goodwill in respect of associates and joint ventures is included in investments in associatesaccounted for using the equity method (i.e. within financial assets) under the equity method in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Where a subsidiary is disposed of or terminated through closure, the carrying value of any goodwill which arose on acquisition of that subsidiary is included in the determination of the net profit or loss on disposal/termination.

Intangible assets (other than goodwill) arising on business combinations - Note 1514

An intangible asset is capitalised separately from goodwill as part of a business combination at cost (fair value at date of acquisition) to the extent that it is probable that the expected future economic benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the Group and that its cost can be measured reliably..

Subsequent to initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. The carrying values of definite-lived intangible assets (the Group does not currently have any indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill) are reviewed for indicators of impairment at each reporting date and are subject to impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable.

The amortisation of intangibleIntangible assets is calculated to write off the book value of definite-lived intangible assets over their useful livesare amortised on a straight-line basis on the assumption of zero residual value.basis. In general, definite-lived intangible assets are amortised over periods ranging from one to ten years, depending on the nature of the intangible asset.

Amortisation periods, useful lives, expected patterns of consumption and residual values are reviewed at each financial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method as appropriate on a prospective basis.

Leases – Notes 3 and 29

CRH    113Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Operating lease rentals are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

LOGO

CRH      143


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSAccounting Policies|continued

 

Other financial assets - Note 1615

All investments are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration given plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Where equity investments are actively traded in organised financial markets, fair value is determined by reference to Stock Exchange quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. Unquoted equity investments are recorded at historical cost and are included within financial assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet given that it is impracticable to determine fair value in accordance with IAS 39. Where non-derivative39 and are included within financial assets meet the definition of “loans and receivables” under IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, such balances are, following initial recognition, recorded at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any allowance for impairment. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired as well as through the amortisation process.

Leases - Notes 4 and 30

Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Operating lease rentals are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.Balance Sheet.

Inventories and construction contracts - Note 1716

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is based on the first-in, first-out principle (and weighted average, where appropriate) and includes all expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their present location and condition. Raw materials are valued on the basis of purchase cost on a first-in, first-out basis. In the case of finished goods and work-in-progress, cost includes direct materials, direct labour and attributable overheads based on normal operating capacity and excludes borrowing costs.

Net realisable value is the estimated proceeds of sale less all further costs to completion, and less all costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution. Estimates of net realisable value are based on the most reliable evidence available at the time the estimates are made, taking into consideration fluctuations of price or cost directly relating to events occurring after the end of the period, the likelihood of short-term changes in buyer preferences, product obsolescence or perishability (all of which are generally low given the nature of the Group’s products) and the purpose for which the inventory is held. Materials and other supplies held for use in the production of inventories are not written down below cost if the finished goods, in which they will be incorporated, are expected to be sold at or above cost.

Amounts recoverable on construction contracts, which are included in receivables, are stated at the net invoiced value of the work done less amounts received as progress payments on account. Cumulative costs incurred, net of amounts transferred to cost of sales, after deducting foreseeable losses, provisions for contingencies and payments on account not matched with revenue, are included as construction contract balances in inventories. Cost includes all expenditure directly related to specific projects and an allocation of fixed and variable overheads incurred in the Group’s contract activities based on normal operating capacity.

Trade and other receivables - Note 1817

Trade receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an allowance for potentially uncollectible debts. Provision is made when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be in a position to collect the associated debts. Bad debts are written-off into the Consolidated Income Statement on identification.

Cash and cash equivalents - Note 22

Where investments are categorised asCash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances held for the related balances havepurpose of meeting short-term cash commitments and investments which are readily convertible to a maturityknown amount of three months or less from the date of acquisitioncash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changeschange in value. Bank overdrafts are included within current interest-bearing loans and borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Where the overdrafts are repayable on demand and form an integral part of cash management, they are netted against cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

114    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Liquid investmentsInterest-bearing loans and borrowings – Note 2223

Liquid investments comprise short-term depositsAll loans and current asset investments of less than one year in duration. As the maturity of these investments is greater than three months, these investmentsborrowings are treated as financial assets and are categorised as either “held-for-trading” or “loans and receivables”. Where relevant,initially recorded at the fair value of liquid investments is determined by reference the consideration received net of directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, current and non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings are, in general, measured at amortised cost employing the effective interest methodology. Fixed rate term loans, which have been hedged to floating rates (using interest rate swaps), are measured at amortised cost adjusted for changes in value attributable

to the traded valuehedged risks arising from changes in underlying market interest rates. The computation of actively traded instruments.amortised cost includes any issue costs and any discount or premium materialising on settlement.

Gains and losses are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement through amortisation on the basis of the period of the loans and borrowings.

Borrowing costs arising on financial instruments are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred (unless capitalised as part of the cost of property, plant and equipment).

Derivative financial instruments and hedging practices – Note 24

In order to manage interest rate, foreign currency and commodity risks and to realise the desired currency profile of borrowings, the Group employs derivative financial instruments (principally interest rate swaps, currency swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts). Derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. The carrying value of derivatives is fair value based on discounted future cash flows and adjusted for counterparty risk. Future floating rate cash flows are estimated based on future interest rates (from observable yield curves at the end of the reporting period). Fixed and floating rate cash flows are discounted at future interest rates and translated at period-end foreign exchange rates.

At the inception of a derivative transaction, the Group documents the relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument together with its risk management objective and the strategy underlying the proposed transaction. The Group also documents its assessment, both at the inception of the hedging relationship and subsequently on an ongoing basis, of the effectiveness of the hedging instrument in offsetting movements in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged items.

Derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. Where derivatives do not fulfil the criteria for hedge accounting, changes in fair values are reported in the Consolidated Income Statement. The fair value of interest rate and currency swaps is the estimated amount the Group would pay or receive to terminate the swap at the balance sheet date taking into account interest and currency rates at that date and the creditworthiness of the swap counterparties. The fair value of forward exchange contracts is calculated by reference to forward exchange rates for contracts with similar maturity profiles and equates to the quoted market price at the balance sheet date (being the present value of the quoted forward price).

Fair value and cash flow hedges

The Group uses fair value hedges and cash flow hedges in its treasury activities. For the purposes of hedge accounting, hedges are classified either as fair value hedges (which entail hedging the exposure to movements in the fair value of a recognised asset or liability or an unrecognised firm commitment that could affect profit or loss) or cash flow hedges (which hedge exposure to fluctuations in future cash flows derived from a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability, or a highly probable forecast transaction that could affect profit or loss).

Where the conditions for hedge accounting are satisfied and the hedging instrument concerned is classified as a fair value hedge, any gain or loss stemming from the re-measurementremeasurement of the hedging instrument to fair value is reported in the Consolidated Income Statement. In addition, any gain or loss on the hedged item which is attributable to the hedged risk is adjusted against the carrying amount of the hedged item and reflected in the Consolidated Income Statement. Where the adjustment is to the carrying amount of a hedged interest-bearing financial instrument, the adjustment is amortised to the Consolidated Income Statement with the objective of achieving full amortisation by maturity.

Where a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction that could affect profit or loss, the effective part of any gain or loss on the derivative financial instrument is recognised as other comprehensive income, net of the income tax effect, with the ineffective portion being reported in the Consolidated Income Statement. The associated gains or losses that had previously been recognised as other comprehensive income are transferred to the Consolidated Income Statement contemporaneously with the materialisation of the hedged transaction. Any gain or loss arising in respect of changes in the time value of the derivative financial instrument is excluded from the measurement of hedge effectiveness and is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.

144      CRH


Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that point in time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised as other comprehensive income remains there until the forecast transaction occurs. If a

CRH    115


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

hedged transaction is no longer anticipated to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss previously recognised as other comprehensive income is transferred to the Consolidated Income Statement in the period.

Net investment hedges

Where foreign currency borrowings provide a hedge against a net investment in a foreign operation, and the hedge is deemed to be effective, foreign exchange differences are taken directly to a foreign currency translation reserve. The ineffective portion of any gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement. Cumulative gains and losses remain in equity until disposal of the net investment in the foreign operation at which point the related differences are transferred to the Consolidated Income Statement as part of the overall gain or loss on sale.

Interest-bearing loans and borrowingsFair value hierarchy – Note 2324

All loans and borrowingsFor financial reporting purposes, fair value measurements are initially recorded atcategorised into Level 1, 2 or 3 based on the degree to which inputs to the fair value measurements are observable and the significance of the consideration received netinputs to the fair value measurement in its entirety, which are described as follows:

Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: valuation techniques for which the lowest level of directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, current and non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings are, in general, measured at amortised cost employing the effective interest methodology. Fixed rate term loans,inputs which have been hedged to floating rates (using interest rate swaps), are measured at amortised cost adjusted for changes in value attributable to the hedged risks arising from changes in underlying market interest rates. The computation of amortised cost includes any issue costs and any discount or premium materialising on settlement. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Gains and losses are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement through amortisationa significant effect on the basisrecorded fair value are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: valuation techniques for which the lowest level of inputs that have a significant effect on the period of the loans and borrowings.recorded fair value are not based on observable market data.

Borrowing costs arising on financial instruments are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred (unless capitalised as part of the cost of property, plant and equipment).

Share capital and dividends – Notes 1211 and 2928

Treasury Shares and own shares

Ordinary Shares acquired by the Parent Company or purchased by the Employee Benefit Trust on behalf of the Parent Company under the terms of the Performance Share Plans and the Restricted Share Plan are deducted from equity and presented on the face of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Parent Company’s Ordinary Shares.

Dividends

Dividends on Ordinary Shares are recognised as a liability in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the period in which they are declared by the Parent Company.

Emission rights

Emission rights are accounted for such that a liability is recognised only in circumstances where emission rights have been exceeded from the perspective of the Group as a whole and the differential between actual and permitted emissions will have to be remedied through the purchase of the required additional rights at fair value; assetsvalue. Assets and liabilities arising in respect of under and over-utilisation of emission credits respectively are accordingly netted against one another in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. To the extent that excess emission rights are disposed of during a financial period, the profit or loss materialising thereon is recognised immediately within cost of sales in the Consolidated Income Statement.

116    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Foreign currency translation

Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in euro, which is the presentation currency of the Group and the functional currency of the Parent Company.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. All currency translation differences are taken to the Consolidated Income Statement with the exception of all monetary items that provide an effective hedge for a net investment in a foreign operation. These are recognised in other comprehensive income until the disposal of the net investment, at which time they are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Results and cash flows of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates with non-euro functional currencies have been translated into euro at average exchange rates for the year, and the related balance sheets have been translated at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Adjustments arising on translation of the results and net assets of non-euro subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates at average rates, and on restatement of the opening net assets at closing rates, are recognised in a separate translation reserve within equity, net of differences on related currency borrowings. All other translation differences are taken to the Consolidated Income Statement.

On disposal of a foreign operation, accumulated currency translation differences are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement as part of the overall gain or loss on disposal. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition of a foreign operation are regarded as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation are expressed in the functional currency of the foreign operation, are recorded in euro at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction and are subsequently retranslated at the applicable closing rates.translated accordingly.

The principal exchange rates used for the translation of results, cash flows and balance sheets into euro were as follows:

 

 
  Average   Year-end Average Year-end 
euro 1 =  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2009 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 

US Dollar

   1.3922     1.3257     1.3948     1.2939     1.3362     1.4406   1.3290   1.3281   1.2848   1.2141   1.3791   1.3194  

Pound Sterling

   0.8679     0.8578     0.8909     0.8353     0.8608     0.8881   0.8062   0.8493   0.8109   0.7789   0.8337   0.8161  

Polish Zloty

   4.1212     3.9947     4.3276     4.4580     3.9750     4.1045   4.1839   4.1975   4.1847   4.2732   4.1543   4.0740  

Ukrainian Hryvnya

   11.1202     10.5478     11.2404     10.3752     10.5676     11.4738  
Ukrainian Hryvnia 15.8908   10.8339   10.3933   19.1814   11.3583   10.6259  

Swiss Franc

   1.2326     1.3803     1.5100     1.2156     1.2504     1.4836   1.2147   1.2311   1.2053   1.2024   1.2276   1.2072  

Canadian Dollar

   1.3763     1.3651     1.5850     1.3215     1.3322     1.5128   1.4664   1.3684   1.2842   1.4063   1.4671   1.3137  

Argentine Peso

   5.7508     5.1898     5.2111     5.5746     5.2744     5.4885   10.7785   7.2892   5.8492   10.2645   8.9910   6.4890  

Turkish Lira

   2.3388     1.9965     2.1631     2.4432     2.0694     2.1547   2.9068   2.5335   2.3135   2.8320   2.9605   2.3551  

Indian Rupee

   64.9067     60.5878     67.4271     68.7130     59.7580     66.9539   81.0576   77.9300   68.5973   76.7190   85.3660   72.5600  

Chinese Renminbi

   8.9968     8.9712     9.5277     8.1588     8.8220     9.8350   8.1883   8.1646   8.1052   7.5358   8.3491   8.2207  

 

 

CRH    117LOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      145

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

Notes on Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Segment Information

CRH is a diversified international building materials group which manufactures and distributes a range of building materials products from the fundamentals of heavy materials and elements to construct the frame, through value-added products that complete the building envelope, to distribution channels which service construction fit-out and renewal. Based on these key strategic drivers acrossIn conjunction with the value chain,ongoing portfolio review, the Group reorganised its European business in 2014. Following this, the Group is now organised into six business segments comprisingsegments: Europe Materials (including activities in China and India),Heavyside, Europe Products,Lightside, Europe Distribution, Americas Materials, Americas Products and Americas Distribution. Comparative segment information has been restated. No operating segments have been aggregated to form these segments.

Europe Heavyside businesses are predominantly engaged in the manufacturing and supply of cement, aggregates, readymixed and precast concrete, concrete landscaping and asphalt products.

Europe Lightside businesses are predominately engaged in the production and supply of construction accessories, shutters & awnings, fencing and composite access chambers.

Europe Distribution businesses are predominantly engaged in supplying Do-It-Yourself (DIY), General Merchants and Sanitary, Heating and Plumbing (SHAP) businesses catering to the general public and small and medium-sized builders, selling a range of bricks, cement, sanitary, heating, plumbing and other building products.

Americas Materials businesses are predominantly engaged in the production and sale of a range of primary materials including cement, aggregates, asphalt and readymixed concrete asphalt/bitumenproducts and agricultural and/or chemical lime.provide asphalt paving services.

Americas Products businesses are predominantly engaged in the production and sale of architecturalconcrete masonry and hardscapes, clay brick, packaged lawn and garden products, packaged cement mixes, fencing, utility, drainage and structural concreteprecast products, clay products, fabricatedglass and tempered glass products,aluminium glazing systems and construction accessories and the provision of a wide range of inter-related products and services to the construction sector.accessories.

Americas Distribution businesses encompass builders merchanting activities and Do-It-Yourself (DIY) storesare predominantly engaged in the marketingsupplying Exterior Products such as roofing and sale of supplies to the construction sectorsiding and to the general public.Interior Products such as gypsum wallboard, metal studs and acoustical ceiling systems.

The principal factors employed in the identification of the six segments reflected in this note include the Group’s organisational structure in 2014, the nature of the reporting lines to the Chief Operating Decision-Maker (as defined in IFRS 8Operating Segments), the structure of internal reporting documentation such as management accounts and budgets, and the degree of homogeneity of products, services and geographical areas within each of the segments from which revenue is derived.

The Chief Operating Decision-Maker monitors the operating results of segments separately in order to allocate resources between segments and to assess performance. Segment performance is predominantly evaluated based on operating profit. As performance is also evaluated using operating profit before depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA (as defined)*), supplemental information based on EBITDA (as defined)* is also provided below. Given that net finance costs and income tax are managed on a centralised basis, these items are not allocated between operating segments for the purposes of the information presented to the Chief Operating Decision-Maker and are accordingly omitted from the detailed segmental analysis below. There are no asymmetrical allocations to reporting segments which would require disclosure.

 

*Defined

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

118    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

146      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. Segment Information|continued

A. Operating segments disclosures - Consolidated Income Statement data

 

  Continuing operations - year ended 31 December 
  Materials  Products  Distribution  Total Group 
   2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 

Revenue

            

Europe

  2,985    2,665    2,749    2,648    2,817    3,002    4,340    3,566    3,633    9,973    9,048    9,384  

Americas

  4,395    4,417    4,280    2,378    2,469    2,536    1,335    1,239    1,173    8,108    8,125    7,989  
   7,380    7,082    7,029    5,026    5,286    5,538    5,675    4,805    4,806    18,081    17,173    17,373  

Group operating profit before depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA (as defined)*)

  

Europe

  436    423    434    194    198    283    267    214    204    897    835    921  

Americas

  530    566    670    164    154    173    65    60    39    759    780    882  
   966    989    1,104    358    352    456    332    274    243    1,656    1,615    1,803  

Depreciation and amortisation (including asset impairment charges)

  

Europe

  172    172    177    128    187    167    77    79    67    377    438    411  

Americas

  266    278    263    122    178    150    20    23    24    408    479    437  
   438    450    440    250    365    317    97    102    91    785    917    848  

Group operating profit (EBIT)

  

         

Europe

  264    251    257    66    11    116    190    135    137    520    397    510  

Americas

  264    288    407    42    (24  23    45    37    15    351    301    445  
   528    539    664    108    (13  139    235    172    152    871    698    955  

Profit on disposals (i)

           55    55    26  

Finance costs (net)

           (257  (247  (297
Group share of associates’ profit after tax (ii)                            42    28    48  

Profit before tax

                                      711    534    732  

Asset impairment charges of21 million (2010:102 million; 200941 million) relate to Europe Materialsnil million (2010:nil million; 2009:9 million), Europe Products15 million (2010:54 million; 2009:19 million), Europe Distribution2 million (2010:8 million; 2009nil million) and Americas Products4 million (2010:40 million; 2009:13 million).

(i) Profit on disposals (note 5)

  

Europe

  14    4    4    20    13    1    7    21    5    41    38    10  

Americas

  14    17    17    -    -    (1  -    -    -    14    17    16  
  28    21    21    20    13    -    7    21    5    55    55    26  
  Continuing operations - year ended 31 December 

(ii) Group share of associates’ profit after tax (note 10)

  

      
              Group operating profit                   
              before depreciation and   Depreciation,         
              amortisation (EBITDA   amortisation and   Group operating profit 
  Revenue   (as defined)*)   impairment (i)   (EBIT) 
  2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013 2012   2014 2013 2012 
  €m   m   m   €m   m   m   €m   m m   €m m m 

Europe Heavyside

   3,929     3,786     3,972     380     326     426     229     721    239     151    (395  187  

Europe Lightside

   913     856     888     94     71     78     23     43    29     71    28    49  

Europe Distribution

   3,999     3,936     3,956     190     186     217     78     80    72     112    106    145  

Europe

  41    35    39    -    1    1    -    (9  7    41    27    47     8,841     8,578     8,816     664     583     721     330     844    340     334    (261  381  

Americas Materials

   5,070     4,721     4,886     609     557     555     254     331    276     355    226    279  

Americas Products

   3,225     3,068     2,806     263     246     204     118     178    118     145    68    86  

Americas Distribution

   1,776     1,664     1,576     105     89     83     22     22    24     83    67    59  

Americas

  1    1    1    -    -    -    -    -    -    1    1    1     10,071     9,453     9,268     977     892     842     394     531    418     583    361    424  

Total Group

   18,912     18,031     18,084     1,641     1,475     1,563     724     1,375    758     917    100    805  
  42    36    40    -    1    1    -    (9  7    42    28    48  

Profit on disposals (ii)

Profit on disposals (ii)

  

              77    26    230  

Finance costs less income

Finance costs less income

  

              (246  (249  (256

Other financial expense

Other financial expense

  

              (42  (48  (49

Share of equity accounted investments’ profit/(loss) (iii)

Share of equity accounted investments’ profit/(loss) (iii)

  

        55    (44  (84

Profit/(loss) before tax

Profit/(loss) before tax

  

                    761    (215  646  

(i) See notes 13 and 14 for details of the impairment charge.

(i) See notes 13 and 14 for details of the impairment charge.

  

           
                                    (iii) Share of equity 
                          (ii) Profit/(loss) on   accounted investments’ 
                          disposals (note 4)   profit/(loss) (note 9) 

Europe Heavyside

Europe Heavyside

  

         38     6    158     35    (60  (99

Europe Lightside

Europe Lightside

  

         1     6    44     -    -    -  

Europe Distribution

Europe Distribution

  

         6     (2  3     13    9    14  

Europe

Europe

  

            45     10    205     48    (51  (85

Americas Materials

Americas Materials

  

         11     19    24     7    7    1  

Americas Products

Americas Products

  

         20     (3  1     -    -    -  

Americas Distribution

Americas Distribution

  

         1     -    -     -    -    -  

Americas

Americas

  

            32     16    25     7    7    1  

Total Group

Total Group

  

            77     26          230     55    (44  (84

 

*Defined

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profitequity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

CRH    119LOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      147

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

1. Segment Information|continued

B. Operating segments disclosures - Consolidated Balance Sheet data

 

 Continuing operations - year ended 31 December   Continuing operations - as at 31 December 
 Materials Products Distribution Total Group   Total assets   Total liabilities 
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
   2014   2013   2014   2013 
  €m   m   €m   m 

Total assets

        
Europe Heavyside   3,864     4,605     1,468     1,428  
Europe Lightside   761     768     215     180  
Europe Distribution   2,221     2,217     644     542  

Europe

  4,582    4,403    2,415    2,735    2,297    2,233    9,294    9,371     6,846     7,590     2,327     2,150  
Americas Materials   6,245     5,510     969     772  
Americas Products   2,542     2,360     679     656  
Americas Distribution   951     853     283     255  

Americas

  5,915    5,495    2,337    2,279    827    658    9,079    8,432     9,738     8,723     1,931     1,683  
  10,497    9,898    4,752    5,014    3,124    2,891    18,373    17,803  
Total Group   16,584     16,313     4,258     3,833  

Reconciliation to total assets as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

Reconciliation to total assets as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

  

        

Investments accounted for using the equity method

        948    1,037     1,329     1,340      

Other financial assets

        239    149     23     23      

Derivative financial instruments (current and non-current)

        205    208     102     80      

Income tax assets (current and deferred)

        298    497     186     133      

Liquid investments

        29    37  

Cash and cash equivalents

  1,295    1,730     3,262     2,540      
Assets held for sale   531     -      

Total assets as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet

Total assets as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet

  

  21,387    21,461     22,017     20,429      

Total liabilities

        

Europe

  1,290    1,043    702    811    591    530    2,583    2,384  

Americas

  767    706    523    437    226    183    1,516    1,326  
  2,057    1,749    1,225    1,248    817    713    4,099    3,710  

Reconciliation to total liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

Reconciliation to total liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

  

        
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (current and non-current)Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (current and non-current)         4,982    5,361         5,866     5,540  

Derivative financial instruments (current and non-current)

Derivative financial instruments (current and non-current)

  

       30    87         23     53  

Income tax liabilities (current and deferred)

  1,693    1,892         1,459     1,317  
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale       213     -  
Total liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance SheetTotal liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet    10,804    11,050           11,819     10,743  

C. Operating segments disclosures - other items

Additions to non-current assets

 

  Continuing operations - year ended 31 December 
  Materials   Products   Distribution   Total Group 
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Additions to non-current assets

                       

Europe:

 Property, plant and equipment (note 14)  189     167     260     77     54     51     51     45     42     317     266     353  
 

Financial assets (note 16)

  18     53     235     -     2     -     1     8     1     19     63     236  

Americas:

 Property, plant and equipment (note 14)  192     144     125     54     51     51     13     5     3     259     200     179  
 

Financial assets (note 16)

  5     4     8     -     -     -     -     -     -     5     4     8  
   404     368     628     131     107     102     65     58     46     600     533     776  
   Continuing operations - year ended 31 December 
   Property, plant and   Financial assets   Total Group 
   equipment (note 13)   (note 15)             
   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m   €m   m   m   €m   m   m 

Europe Heavyside

   113     132     165     -     70     44     113     202     209  

Europe Lightside

   14     13     20     -     -     2     14     13     22  

Europe Distribution

   36     49     70     -     1     1     36     50     71  

Europe

   163     194     255     -     71     47     163     265     302  

Americas Materials

   173     199     212     3     7     9     176     206     221  

Americas Products

   81     83     69     -     -     -     81     83     69  

Americas Distribution

   18     21     8     -     -     -     18     21     8  

Americas

   272     303     289     3     7     9     275     310     298  

Total Group

   435     497     544     3     78     56     438     575     600  

148      CRH


1. Segment Information|continued

D. Entity-wide disclosures

Section 1: Information about products and services

The Group’s revenue from external customers in respect of its principal products and services is analysed in the disclosures above. Segment revenue includes3,1713,351 million (2010:(2013:3,187 million; 2009:3,268 million, 2012:3,2523,456 million) in respect of revenue applicable to construction contracts. The bulk of our construction activities are performed by our Americas Materials reportable segment, are for the most part short-term in nature and are generally completed within the same financial reporting period.

120    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Segment Informationcontinued

Revenue derived through the supply of services and intersegment revenue is not material to the Group. The transfer pricing policy implemented by the Group between operating segments and across its constituent entities is described in greater detail in note 32.31. In addition, due to the nature of building materials, which exhibit a low value-to-weight ratio, the Group’s revenue streams include a low level of cross-border transactions.

Section 2: Information about geographical areas and customers

CRH has a presence in 3634 countries worldwide. The revenues from external customers and non-current assets (as defined in IFRS 8) attributable to the country of domicile and all foreign countries of operation are as follows; regionsindividual foreign countries which exceed 10% of total external Group revenue have been highlighted separately on the basis of materiality.

 

  Year ended 31 December   As at 31 December 
  Year ended 31 December   As at 31 December   Revenue by destination   Non-current assets 
  Revenue by destination   Non-current assets   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013 
  2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   

2011

m

   

2010

m

   €m   m   m   €m   m 

Country of domicile - Republic of Ireland

   308     365     500     530     557     306     278     267     477     475  

United States of America

   9,650     8,991     8,880     6,948     6,241  

Benelux (mainly the Netherlands)

   2,593     2,495     2,762     1,351     1,384     2,350     2,324     2,327     1,231     1,280  

Americas (mainly the United States)

   8,125     8,137     7,997     6,930     6,576  

Other

   7,055     6,176     6,114     5,800     5,866     6,606     6,438     6,610     4,268     4,794  

Group totals

   18,081     17,173     17,373     14,611     14,383  

Total Group

   18,912     18,031     18,084     12,924     12,790  

There are no material dependencies or concentrations on individual customers which would warrant disclosure under IFRS 8. The individual entities within the Group have a large number of customers spread across various activities, end-uses and geographies.

 

 

2. Proportionate Consolidation of Joint Ventures

The Group’s share of the income and expenses of its joint ventures for the years ended 31 December 2011, 2010 and 2009, the assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2011 and 2010 and future purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment, which are proportionately consolidated in the Consolidated Financial Statements, are as follows:

Impact on Consolidated Income StatementCost Analysis

 

    

2011

m

  

2010

m

  

2009

m

 

Group share of:

    

Revenue

   707    1,061    1,095  

Cost of sales

   (482  (744  (768

Gross profit

   225    317    327  

Operating costs

   (165  (249  (233)��

Operating profit

   60    68    94  

Profit on disposals

   2    1    1  

Profit before finance costs

   62    69    95  

Finance costs (net)

   (6  (7  (7

Profit before tax

   56    62    88  

Income tax expense

   (11  (21  (19

Group profit for the financial year

   45    41    69  

Depreciation

   53    60    55  
   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m 

Cost of sales analysis

      

Raw materials and goods for resale

   7,527     7,240     7,282  

Employment costs (note 5)

   1,985     1,974     1,946  

Energy conversion costs

   655     644     670  

Repairs and maintenance

   452     421     411  

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment (i)

   532     792     559  

Change in inventory (note 19)

   34     37     (93

Other production expenses (primarily sub-contractor costs and equipment rental)

   2,242     2,045     2,243  

Total

   13,427     13,153     13,018  

Operating costs analysis

      

Selling and distribution costs

   3,143     3,054     3,035  

Administrative expenses

   1,425     1,724     1,226  

Total

   4,568     4,778     4,261  

CRH    121


Consolidated Financial Statements

(i) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment analysis

 

   Cost of sales   Operating costs   Total 
   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m   €m   m   m   €m   m   m 

Depreciation and depletion (note 13)

   485     521     538     146     150     148     631     671     686  

Impairment of property, plant and equipment (note 13)

   47     271     21     2     4     4     49     275     25  

Impairment of intangible assets (note 14)

   -     -     -     -     375     3     -     375     3  

Amortisation of intangible assets (note 14)

   -     -     -     44     54     44     44     54     44  

Total

   532     792     559     192     583     199     724     1,375     758  

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LOGO

 

CRH      149


LOGO

 

2. Proportionate ConsolidationCost Analysis|continued

Segmental analysis of Joint Venturescontinued2013 impairment charges

 

                 Portfolio         
                 review         
                 included in         
   Annual             Included in   share of equity         
   impairment           Portfolio     operating   accounted         
   process   review     profit   entities                   Total 
    €m   €m     €m   €m       €m 

Europe Heavyside

   58     444      502     101        603  

Europe Lightside

   -     13      13     -        13  

Europe Distribution

   4     -      4     4        8  

Europe

   62     457      519     105        624  

Americas Materials

   -     60      60     -        60  

Americas Products

   10     61      71     -        71  

Americas Distribution

   -     -      -     -        -  

Americas

   10     121      131     -        131  

Total Group

   72     578      650     105        755  

Impact on Consolidated Balance Sheet

    2011
m
  2010
m
 

Group share of:

   

Non-current assets

   1,302    1,324  

Current assets

   306    332  

Total assets

   1,608    1,656  

Total equity

   1,051    1,116  

Non-current liabilities

   371    371  

Current liabilities

   186    169  

Total liabilities

   557    540  

Total equity and liabilities

   1,608    1,656  
Analysis of net debt*   

Liquid investments and cash and cash equivalents

   77    96  

Derivative financial instruments

   (1  -  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (amounts due to CRH)

   (71  (66

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (amounts due to others)

   (153  (123

Analysis of net debt included above

   (148  (93

* As defined in note 25.

   
Future purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment   

Contracted for but not provided in the financial statements

   9    31  

Authorised by the Directors but not contracted for

   110    120  

A listingNarrative disclosures regarding the 2013 impairments are included in section (b) of the principal joint ventures is contained in Exhibit 8 to this Annual Report. As noted in the 2010 Annual Report, the Group acquired an additional 50% of one of its principal joint ventures, Bauking (Europe Distribution), at the end of 2010.

In June 2004, CRH acquired a 49% shareholding with joint management control in Secil (Europe Materials, primarily Portugal) for an equity consideration of329 million plus share of net debt at acquisition of100 million. In August 2011, the Arbitral Tribunal in Paris (functioning under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce) concluded that the exercise of a call option for the purchase of CRH’s 49% shareholding in Secil by Semapa (SGPS, S.A.) was valid. As a result of the ruling, both parties are now obligated to complete the sale and purchase of CRH’s shareholding in Secil at an equity price of574 million. In November 2011, Semapa initiated legal proceedings to appeal against this ruling and these legal proceedings are ongoing. Semapa also purported to terminate the shareholders’ agreement between it and CRH by notice dated 18 October 2011. The purported termination is disputed by CRH and CRH has now referred this dispute to a further arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce.

In 2011 Secil (on the basis of CRH’s 49% shareholding) achieved sales of248 million and net debt at 31 December 2011 amounted to70 million.

122    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

note 14.

 

 

3. Cost Analysis

   

2011

m

  

2010

m

  

2009

m

 

Cost of sales analysis

   

Raw materials and goods for resale

  8,230    7,165    6,859  

Employment costs (note 7)

  1,791    1,869    1,834  

Energy

  780    694    582  

Repairs and maintenance

  416    410    370  

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment (i)

  556    601    570  

Change in inventory (note 20)

  (69  (16  442  

Other production expenses (primarily sub-contractor costs and equipment rental)

  1,475    1,640    1,853  

Total

  13,179    12,363    12,510  
Operating costs analysis         

Selling and distribution costs

  2,804    2,574    2,410  

Administrative expenses

  1,175    1,390    1,392  

Other operating expenses

  82    169    112  

Other operating income

  (30  (21  (6

Total

  4,031    4,112    3,908  

(i)Depreciation, amortisation and impairment analysis

   Cost of sales   Operating costs   Total 
    

2011

m

   

2010

m

   

2009

m

   

2011

m

   

2010

m

   

2009

m

   

2011

m

   

2010

m

   

2009

m

 

Depreciation and depletion (note 14)

   556     601     570     170     170     194     726     771     764  
Impairment of property, plant and equipment (note 14)   -     -     -     16     15     30     16     15     30  

Impairment of intangible assets (note 15)

   -     -     -     5     87     11     5     87     11  

Amortisation of intangible assets (note 15)

   -     -     -     38     44     43     38     44     43  

Total

   556     601     570     229     316     278     785     917     848  

CRH    123


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Operating Profit Disclosures

 

    

2011

m

   

2010

m

   

2009

m

 

Operating lease rentals*

      

- hire of plant and machinery

   98     90     86  

- land and buildings

   173     161     152  

- other operating leases

   49     42     44  

Total

   320     293     282  

Auditors’ remuneration*

      

Fees for professional services provided by the Group’s independent auditors in respect of each of the following categories were:

  2014   2013   2012 
  €m   m   m 

Operating lease rentals

      

- hire of plant and machinery

   149     108     99  

- land and buildings

   216     220     187  

- other operating leases

   48     47     69  

Total

   413     375     355  

Auditor’s remuneration

      
Fees for professional services provided by the Group’s independent auditor in respect of each of the following categories were:Fees for professional services provided by the Group’s independent auditor in respect of each of the following categories were:  

Audit fees (i)

   13     13     13     14     14     14  

Audit-related fees (ii)

   2     3     1     1     2     2  

Tax fees

   1     1     1     1     1     1  

All other fees

   -     -     -     -     -     -  

Total

   16     17     15     16     17     17  

 

(i)

Audit fees includeof the Group accounts includes Sarbanes-Oxley attestation and parent and subsidiary statutory audit fees, but excludeexcludes2 million (2010:(2013:21 million; 2009:2012:21 million) paid to auditors other than the Group’s auditors.EY.

 

(ii)Audit-related fees include

Other assurance services includes attestation and due diligence services that are closely related to the performance of the audit.

*Includes the Group’s proportionate share of amounts in joint ventures.

124    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

150      CRH


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. Profit on4. Business and Non-current Asset Disposals

 

(a) Profit on disposal          Disposal of other           
  Business disposals non-current assets   Total 
 Disposal of
subsidiaries and
joint ventures
(i)
 Disposal of
associate
investments
(ii)
 Disposal of other
non-current
assets
 Total   2014 (i)   2013 2012 (ii) 2014   2013   2012   2014   2013 2012 
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
 2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
   €m   m m €m   m   m   €m   m m 
Assets/(liabilities) disposed of at net carrying amount:                           

- property, plant and equipment (note 14)

  141    49    -    -    -    -    61    84    68    202    133    68  

- intangible assets (note 15)

  65    7    -    -    -    -    -    1    1    65    8    1  

- financial assets (note 16)

  -    -    -    128    -    -    13    7    8    141    7    8  

- non-current assets (notes 13,14,15)

   117     43    432    83     66     90     200     109    522  

- cash and cash equivalents

  38    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    38    -    -     -     -    3    -     -     -     -     -    3  

- working capital and provisions (note 20)

  35    17    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    35    17    -  

- current tax

  1    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    1    -    -  

- working capital and provisions (note 19)

   11     6    21    -     -     -     11     6    21  

- asset held for sale (iii) (note 15)

   -     139    -    -     -       -     139    -  

- interest-bearing loans and borrowings

  (50  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (50  -    -     -     (17  (2  -     -     -     -     (17  (2

- deferred tax (note 27)

  (9  (11  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (9  (11  -  

- pension liabilities (note 28)

  -    (5  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (5  -  

- deferred tax (note 26)

   -     -    1    -     -     -     -     -    1  

- retirement benefit obligations (note 27)

   -     -    (4  -     -     -     -     -    (4

Net assets disposed

  221    57    -    128    -    -    74    92    77    423    149    77     128     171    451    83     66     90     211     237    541  
Re-classification of currency translation effects on disposal  2    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    2    -    -  
Reclassification of currency translation effects on disposal   57     3    14    -     -     -     57     3    14  

Total

  223    57    -    128    -    -    74    92    77    425    149    77     185     174    465    83     66     90     268     240    555  

Proceeds from disposals (net of disposal costs)

  250    51    -    128    -    -    102    137    103    480    188    103     224     26    652    121     96     133     345     122    785  

Profit on step acquisition (note 31)

  -    16    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    16    -  

Profit on disposals

  27    10    -    -    -    -    28    45    26    55    55    26  

Asset exchange (iii) (note 30)

   -     144    -    -     -     -     -     144    -  

Profit/(loss) on disposals

   39     (4  187    38     30     43     77     26    230  

Net cash inflow arising on disposal

                           

Cash proceeds

  250    51    -    128    -    -    102    137    103    480    188    103     224     26    652    121     96     133     345     122    785  

Less: cash and cash equivalents disposed

  (38  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (38  -    -     -     -    (3  -     -     -     -     -    (3

Total

  212    51    -    128    -    -    102    137    103    442    188    103     224     26    649    121     96     133     345     122    782  

 

(i)

This relates principally to the disposalsdisposal of our 50% equity stake in 2011our Turkish joint venture, Denizli Çimento (which was part of the Insulation and Climate Control businesses in Europe Products.Heavyside segment).

(ii)

This relates principally to the disposal of our 35% associate49% investment in our Portugese joint venture, Secil (which was part of the Trialis distribution business in France.Europe Heavyside segment).

(iii)

On 25 February 2013, the Group transferred its 26% stake in Corporacion Uniland to Cementos Portland Valderrivas in exchange for a 99% stake in Cementos Lemona, an integrated cement, readymixed concrete and aggregates business.

(b) Assets held for sale

In November 2013, a Group-wide portfolio review was initiated which identified a number of business units which did not meet our future returns objectives and which were in line for divestment. This review was completed during 2014; a multi-year divestment programme commenced during the year, with proceeds of0.35 billion realised on business and non-current asset disposals in 2014.

On 15 December 2014, the Group announced that it had reached agreement to dispose of its clay and concrete businesses in the United Kingdom (Europe Heavyside) and its clay business in the United States (Americas Products) for an Enterprise Value (EV) of Stg £414 million. As part of the transaction, the purchaser will assume certain debt and pension liabilities and accordingly, the net cash consideration payable to CRH is expected to be approximately Stg £295 million. The transaction closed in the first quarter of 2015. The assets associated with this transaction, together with a number of smaller business units, met the “held for sale” criteria set out in IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations as at 31 December 2014 and the relevant assets and liabilities have accordingly been reclassified as assets or liabilities held for sale as appropriate as set out in the table below.

The businesses either divested in 2014 or held for sale at year-end 2014 are not considered to be either separate major lines of business or geographical areas of operation and therefore do not constitute discontinued operations as defined in IFRS 5.

31 December
2014
€m

Assets

Property, plant and equipment (note 13)

262

Intangible assets (note 14)

17

Financial assets (note 15)

34

Deferred income tax assets (note 26)

4

Inventories (note 19)

102

Trade and other receivables (note 19)

79

Cash and cash equivalents (note 22)

33

Assets held for sale

531

Liabilities

Trade and other payables (note 19)

98

Current income tax liabilities

4

Provisions for liabilities (note 19)

7

Deferred income tax liabilities (note 26)

23

Retirement benefit obligations (note 27)

81

Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale

213

Net assets held for sale

318

Total losses recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity relating to assets held for sale amounted to164 million at 31 December 2014.

LOGO

CRH      151


LOGO

5. Employment

The average number of employees is as follows:

   Year ended 31 December 
    2014     2013     2012  

Europe Heavyside

   19,096     19,996     19,879  

Europe Lightside

   5,003     4,849     4,664  

Europe Distribution

   11,607     11,263     11,086  

Europe

   35,706     36,108     35,629  

Americas Materials

   18,457     18,216     18,106  

Americas Products

   17,707     17,276     15,546  

Americas Distribution

   3,836     3,709     3,532  

Americas

   40,000     39,201     37,184  

Total Group

   75,706     75,309     72,813  

Employment costs charged in the Consolidated Income Statement are analysed as follows:

  

  
   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m 

Wages and salaries

   2,987     2,915     2,876  

Social welfare costs

   368     360     359  

Other employment-related costs

   448     464     432  

Share-based payment expense (note 7)

   16     15     14  

Total retirement benefits expense (note 27)

   215     201     181  

Total

   4,034     3,955     3,862  

Total charge analysed between:

      

Cost of sales

   1,985     1,974     1,946  

Operating costs

   2,035     1,959     1,891  

Finance costs (net) - applicable to retirement benefit obligations (note 8)

   14     22     25  

Total

   4,034     3,955     3,862  

 

 

6. Directors’ Emoluments and Interests

Directors’ emoluments (which are included in administrative expenses in note 3)2) and interests are givenpresented in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 85108 to 96131 of this Annual Report.

 

CRH    125


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. Employment

The average number of employees (including the Group’s proportionate share of employees in joint ventures) is as follows:

Year ended 31 December 2011  Materials   Products   Distribution   Total
Group
 

Europe

   11,649     16,636     12,147     40,432  

Americas

   17,805     14,895     3,301     36,001  

Total

   29,454     31,531     15,448     76,433  

Year ended 31 December 2010

        

Europe

   11,891     17,787     10,639     40,317  

Americas

   17,751     15,103     3,247     36,101  

Total

   29,642     32,890     13,886     76,418  

Year ended 31 December 2009

        

Europe

   12,599     18,454     10,997     42,050  

Americas

   18,075     16,349     3,348     37,772  

Total

   30,674     34,803     14,345     79,822  

Employment costs charged in the Consolidated Income Statement (including the Group’s proportionate share of joint ventures’ costs) are analysed as follows:

    

2011

m

   

2010

m

  

2009

m

 

Wages and salaries

   2,692     2,722    2,711  

Social welfare costs

   344     337    340  

Other employment-related costs

   378     385    418  

Share-based payment expense (note 8)

   21     19    28  

Total pension costs (note 28)

   158     173    179  

Total

   3,593     3,636    3,676  

Total charge analysed between:

     

Cost of sales

   1,791     1,869    1,834  

Operating costs

   1,795     1,762    1,834  

Profit on disposals - applicable to defined benefit pension schemes (note 5)

   -     (5  -  

Finance costs (net) - applicable to defined benefit pension schemes (note 9)

   7     10    8  

Total

   3,593     3,636    3,676  

126    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8. Share-based Payment Expense

 

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Share option expense

   9     9     18  

Performance Share Plan expense

   12     10     10  

Total

   21     19     28  
   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m 

Share option expense (i)

   1     1     -  

Performance Share Plans and Restricted Share Plan expense (ii)

   15     14     14  

Total

   16     15     14  

Share-based

(i)

Relates to options granted under the 2000 share option scheme, the 2010 share option scheme and the savings-related share option schemes.

(ii)

Relates to awards granted under the 2006 and 2014 Performance Share Plans and the 2013 Restricted Share Plan.

The share-based payment expense is reflected in operating costs in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Share option schemes

In May 2010,2014, shareholders approved the adoption of a new share option and savings-related share option schemes,Performance Share Plan (the “2014 Performance Share Plan”), which replaced schemes approvedthe 2006 Performance Share Plan (approved by shareholders in May 2000.2006), the 2010 Share Option Scheme (approved by shareholders in May 2010) and the 2013 Restricted Share Plan (together, the “Existing Plans”). Following the introduction of the 2014 Performance Share Plan, no further awards will be made under the Existing Plans. Consequently, the last awards under the Existing Plans were made in 2013. The general terms and conditions applicable to the new share option andvarious plans are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 112 to 116.

The Group also operates savings-related share option schemes were set out in a circular issued to shareholders on 31 March 2010, a copy of which is available onwww.crh.com.schemes. Due to the immateriality of the savings-related schemes’ expense and the level of savings-related share options outstanding, detailed financial disclosures have not been provided in relation to these schemes.

152      CRH


7. Share-based Payment Expense|continued

Share option schemes

Details of options granted under the share option schemes (excluding savings-related share option schemes)

 

   Weighted
average
exercise
price
  Number
of options
2011
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  Number
of options
2010
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  Number
of options
2009
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 19.38    23,515,521   19.21    24,626,022   21.03    24,025,246  

Rights Issue adjustment - March 2009

  n/a    -    n/a    -    n/a    2,594,915  

Granted (a)

 16.38    3,558,500   18.39    3,343,700   16.93    2,596,000  

Exercised (b)

 13.36    (229,898 15.36    (2,624,284 14.92    (3,562,399

Lapsed

 18.30    (3,252,367 21.14    (1,829,917 21.92    (1,027,740

Outstanding at end of year

 19.13    23,591,756   19.38    23,515,521   19.21    24,626,022  

Exercisable at end of year

 16.03    6,497,695   16.10    8,698,585   16.00    11,816,179  
   Weighted average     Number of        Weighted average   Number of    Weighted average   Number of 
   exercise price   options  exercise price   options  exercise price   options 
         2014       2013       2012 
Outstanding at beginning of year   €18.75     21,798,887    18.84     23,295,955    19.13     23,591,756  
Granted   -     -    16.19     3,853,400    15.19     3,889,100  
Exercised (a)   €16.58     (919,205  13.21     (1,245,029  11.98     (1,010,780
Lapsed   €16.77     (5,398,491  18.53     (4,105,439  18.68     (3,174,121
       
Outstanding at end of year (b)   €19.58     15,481,191    18.75     21,798,887    18.84     23,295,955  
Exercisable at end of year   €18.79     1,248,698    17.94     2,114,772    16.24     3,364,448  

 

(a)Granted in April 2011 (2010: May; 2009: April),The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of these options was20.47 (2013:17.28; 2012:14.95).

(b)

The level of vesting of these options outstanding at the end of the year will be determined by reference to certain performance targets (see pages 86 to 89)(outlined on page 116 of this Annual Report). If the performance criteria have been met, these options, or portion thereof as appropriate, may be exercised after the expiration of three years from their date of grant. All options granted have a life of ten years.

 

    2014   2013   2012 
Weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding at 31 December (years)   4.89     5.54     5.69  
Euro-denominated options outstanding at the end of the year (number)   15,389,922     21,683,559     23,182,257  
Range of exercise prices ()   15.19-29.86     15.07-29.86     11.86-29.86  
Sterling-denominated options outstanding at the end of the year (number)   91,269     115,328     113,698  
Range of exercise prices (Stg£)   12.80-20.23     10.04-20.23     8.17-20.23  

The CRH share price at 31 December 2014 was19.90 (2013:18.30; 2012:15.30). The following analysis shows the number of outstanding share options with exercise prices lower/higher than the year-end share price:

   
Number of options with exercise prices lower than year-end price:      
Exercisable   1,248,698     506,581     1,677,365  
Not exercisable   8,789,200     13,788,399     5,382,296  
    10,037,898     14,294,980     7,059,661  
Number of options with exercise prices higher than year-end price:      
Exercisable   -     1,608,191     1,687,083  
Not exercisable   5,443,293     5,895,716     14,549,211  
    5,443,293     7,503,907     16,236,294  
Total options outstanding   15,481,191     21,798,887     23,295,955  

The Group measures the fair value of options granted using the trinomial model (a lattice option-pricing model in accordance with IFRS 2Share-based Payment). Due to the immateriality of the share option expense in the current and prior years, detailed fair value disclosures have not been included.

2014 Performance Share Plan

The general terms and conditions of the 2014 Performance Share Plan were set out in a circular issued to shareholders prior to the Annual General Meeting held in 2014, a copy of which is available on www.crh.com. The structure of the 2014 Performance Share Plan is set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 112. An expense of5 million was recognised in 2014.

Details of awards granted under the 2014 Performance Share Plan

       Period to   Number of Shares 
   Share price   earliest         
   at date   release   Initial   Net 
    of award   date   award   outstanding 

Granted in 2014

   20.49     3 years     2,283,960     2,270,340  

75% of vesting is subject to Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance against sector peers, while the remaining 25% of vesting is subject to a cumulative cash flow target. A small number of awards are subject only to a three year service period (i.e. no performance conditions).

LOGO

(b)The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of these options was15.11 (2010:18.50; 200918.29).
CRH      153


LOGO

    2011   2010   2009 
Weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding at 31 December (years)   5.53     5.24     5.16  
Euro-denominated options outstanding at the end of the year (number)   23,473,569     23,388,616     24,478,108  

Range of exercise prices ()

   11.86-29.86     11.86-29.86     11.86-29.86  
Sterling-denominated options outstanding at the end of the year (number)   118,187     126,905     147,914  

Range of exercise prices (Stg£)

   8.17-20.23     8.17-20.23     8.17-20.23  

The CRH share price at 31 December 2011 was15.36 (2010:15.50; 200919.01). The following analysis shows the number of outstanding share options with exercise prices lower/higher than the year-end share price:

Number of options with exercise prices lower than year-end price:

      

Exercisable

   2,780,082     3,091,771     11,816,179  

Not exercisable

   1,613,397     1,780,303     4,583,144  
    4,393,479     4,872,074     16,399,323  

Number of options with exercise prices higher than year-end price:

      

Exercisable

   3,717,613     5,606,814     -  

Not exercisable

   15,480,664     13,036,633     8,226,699  
    19,198,277     18,643,447     8,226,699  

Total options outstanding

   23,591,756     23,515,521     24,626,022  

CRH    127


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

8.7. Share-based Payment Expense|continued

Fair values

The weighted average fair value assigned to the 3-year euro-denominated options granted in 2011 under the 2010 share option schemeportion of awards which are subject to TSR performance was4.03 (2010:4.06; 2009: 2000 share option scheme:3.05).10.88. The fair valuesvalue of these options were determinedawards was calculated using a TSR pricing model taking account of peer group TSR, volatilities and correlations together with the following assumptions:

 

    2011   2010   2009 

Weighted average exercise price

   16.38     18.39     16.92  

Risk-free interest rate

   2.68%     1.57%     2.38%  

Expected dividend payments over the expected life

   3.25     3.20     3.20  

Expected volatility

   32.9%     30.8%     24.5%  

Expected life in years

   5     5     5  
2014

Risk-free interest rate (%)

0.13

Expected volatility (%)

21.9

The expected volatility was determined using a historical sample of 6137 month-end CRH share prices. Share options

The fair value of (i) the portion of awards subject to cash flow performance and (ii) the awards with no performance conditions (which are granted at marketsubject to a three year service period) was20.49. The fair value was calculated using the closing CRH share price at the date of grant. The expected livesthe award was granted. Awards vest only if all performance and service conditions are met. No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest. At the balance sheet date the estimate of the options are based on historical datalevel of vesting is reviewed and are therefore not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may materialise.any necessary adjustment to the share-based payment expense is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Other than the assumptions listed above, no other features of option grants were factored into the determination of fair value. No relevant modifications were effected to either the 2010 share option scheme or the previously approved 2000 share option scheme during the course of 2011, 2010 or 2009.

2006 Performance Share Plan

The Group operates a Performance Share Plan which was approved by shareholders in May 2006.

The expense of128 million (2010:(2013:1013 million; 2009:2012:1014 million) reported in the Consolidated Income Statement has been arrived at through applying a Monte Carlo simulation technique to model the combination of market-based and non-market-based performance conditions in the Plan.

Details of awards granted under the 2006 Performance Share Plan

 

        Number of Shares    
   Share price
at date of
award*
  Period to
earliest
release date
  Initial
award
  Rights
Issue
adjustment
  Cumulative
lapses/releases
to date**
  Net
outstanding
  Fair
value
 

Granted in 2008

 23.45    3 years    741,000    76,331    (817,331  -    10.27  

Granted in 2009

 17.00    3 years    1,658,000    -    (248,000  1,410,000    8.29  

Granted in 2010

 18.51    3 years    1,459,750    -    (160,500  1,299,250    10.01  

Granted in 2011

 16.52    3 years    1,684,250    -    (58,500  1,625,750    9.72  
       Period to   Number of Shares     
   Share price   earliest             
   at date   release   Initial   Net   Fair 
    of award   date   award   outstanding           value 

Granted in 2011

   16.52     3 years     1,684,250     -     9.72  

Granted in 2012

   15.63     3 years     2,079,000     1,849,000     7.77  

Granted in 2013

   16.69     3 years     1,195,500     1,040,500     8.54  

In February 2014, 742,604 of the shares awarded under the Performance Share Plan in 2011 vested and accordingly were released to the participants of the scheme. The remaining awards granted in 2011 lapsed.

*Share prices in respect of awards prior to the Rights Issue which took place in March 2009 have not been rights adjusted.

**In March 2011, 313,556 (46.2% of the initial award net of lapses and adjusted for the Rights Issue) of the shares awarded under the Performance Share Plan in 2008 vested and accordingly were released to the participants of the scheme.

The fair value of the shares awarded was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation technique taking account of peer group total shareholder return,TSR, volatilities and correlations, together with the following assumptions:

 

  2013     2012 
  2011   2010   2009 

Risk-free interest rate (%)

   2.08     1.32     1.77     0.10       0.33  

Expected volatility (%)

   38.6     33.5     28.1     31.3       35.4  

The expected volatility was determined using a historical sample2013 Restricted Share Plan

Due to the immateriality of 37 month-end CRH share prices.the Restricted Share Plan expense and the level of awards outstanding in this plan at 31 December 2014 and 31 December 2013, detailed financial disclosures have not been provided in relation to this share-based payment arrangement.

 

128    CRH

154      CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.8. Finance Costs and Finance Income

 

    2014   2013   2012 
  2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
     €m   m   m 

Finance costs

            

Interest payable on borrowings

   335    379    377       308     323     327  

Net income on interest rate and currency swaps

   (65  (105  (77     (42   (55   (47

Mark-to-market of derivatives and related fixed rate debt:

            

- interest rate swaps (i)

   12    7    133       (15   68     22  

- currency swaps and forward contracts

   (2  (7  7       -     1     3  

- fixed rate debt (i)

   (15  (19  (135     8     (79   (34

Net gain on interest rate swaps not designated as hedges

   (3  -    -  

Net (gain)/loss on interest rate swaps not designated as hedges

     (5   4     -  

Net finance cost on gross debt including related derivatives

   262    255    305       254     262     271  

Finance income

            

Interest receivable on loans to joint ventures and associates

   (3  (3  (3     (3   (3   (2

Interest receivable on liquid investments and cash and cash equivalents

   (30  (34  (32

Interest receivable on cash and cash equivalents and other

     (5   (10   (13

Finance income

   (33  (37  (35     (8   (13   (15

Finance costs less income

   229    218    270       246     249     256  

Other financial expense

            

Unwinding of discount element of provisions for liabilities (note 26)

   15    15    15  

Unwinding of discount applicable to deferred and contingent acquisition consideration

   6    4    4  

Pension-related finance cost (net) (note 28)

   7    10    8  

Unwinding of discount element of provisions for liabilities (note 25)

     16     15     15  

Unwinding of discount applicable to deferred and contingent acquisition consideration (note 18)

     12     11     9  

Pension-related finance cost (net) (note 27)

     14     22     25  

Total

   28    29    27       42     48     49  

(i) The Group uses interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate debt to floating rate. Fixed rate debt, which has been converted to floating rate through the use of interest rate swaps, is stated in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at adjusted value to reflect movements in underlying fixed rates. The movement on this adjustment, together with the offsetting movement in the fair value of the related interest rate swaps, is included in finance costs in each reporting period.

(i)The Group uses interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate debt to floating rate. Fixed rate debt, which has been converted to floating rate through the use of interest rate swaps, is stated in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at adjusted value to reflect movements in underlying fixed rates. The movement on this adjustment, together with the offsetting movement in the fair value of the related interest rate swaps, is included in finance costs in each reporting period.

 

 

10. Group9. Share of Associates’ Profit after TaxEquity Accounted Investments’ Profit/(Loss)

The Group’s share of joint ventures’ and associates’ profitresult after tax is equity-accountedequity accounted and is presented as a single-line item in the Consolidated Income Statement. The Group’s share of profit after tax generated by associatesStatement; it is analysed as follows between the principal Consolidated Income Statement captions:

 

  Joint Ventures Associates Total 
  2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
   

    2014

€m

 

      2013

m

 

      2012

m

 

      2014

€m

 

      2013

m

 

      2012

m

 

      2014

€m

 

      2013

m

 

      2012

m

 

Group share of:

              

Revenue

   1,095    1,070    1,029     488    469    575    953    961    978    1,441    1,430    1,553  

Profit before finance costs and impairments

   92    79    64  

Impairments

   (11  (22  -  

EBITDA (as defined)*

   62    60    77    106    109    118    168    169    195  

Depreciation and amortisation

   (27  (27  (37  (45  (39  (50  (72  (66  (87

Impairment (i)

   -    (54  -    -    (51  (146  -    (105  (146

Operating profit/(loss)

   35    (21  40    61    19    (78  96    (2  (38

Finance costs (net)

   (19  (9  (5   (6  (2  (2  (21  (22  (26  (27  (24  (28

Profit before tax

   62    48    59  

Profit/(loss) before tax

   29    (23  38    40    (3  (104  69    (26  (66

Income tax expense

   (20  (20  (11   (3  (5  (10  (11  (13  (8  (14  (18  (18

Profit after tax

   42    28    48  

Profit/(loss) after tax

   26    (28  28    29    (16  (112  55    (44  (84

An analysis of the profitresult after tax by operating segment is presented in note 1. The aggregated balance sheet data (analysed between current and non-current assets and liabilities) in respect of the Group’s investment in joint ventures and associates is presented in note 16.15.

(i) See section (b) of note 14 for details of the 2013 impairment charge.

 

*

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges and profit on disposals.

CRH    129

LOGO

CRH      155


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.10. Income Tax Expense

 

Recognised within the Consolidated Income Statement  2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
     

2014

€m

     

2013

m

     

2012

m

 

(a) Current tax

                

Republic of Ireland

   -    5    (4     -       (1     (4

Overseas

   194    63    40       141       77       103  

Total current tax

   194    68    36  

Total current tax expense

     141       76       99  

(b) Deferred tax

                

Origination and reversal of temporary differences:

                

Defined benefit pension obligations

   27    7    11  

Retirement benefit obligations

     7       16       20  

Share-based payment expense

   -    4    (3     -       (1     1  

Derivative financial instruments

   5    18    (11     6       4       (9

Other items (primarily in relation to losses carried forward in 2011)

   (112  (2  101  

Total deferred tax

   (80  27    98  

Other items

     23       (15     (5

Total deferred tax expense

     36       4       7  

Income tax expense reported in the Consolidated Income Statement

   114    95    134       177       80       106  
Recognised within equity                

(a) Within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income:

                

Deferred tax - defined benefit pension obligations

   56    7    20  

Deferred tax - cash flow hedges

   2    (3  (2
   58    4    18  

(b) Within the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity:

    

Current tax - share option exercises

   -    1    1  

Deferred tax - share-based payment expense

   -    (3  2  
   -    (2  3  

Deferred tax - retirement benefit obligations

     69       (43     23  

Income tax recognised directly within equity

   58    2    21       69       (43     23  

Reconciliation of applicable tax rate to effective tax rate

                

Profit before tax (m)

   711    534    732  

Tax charge expressed as a percentage of profit before tax (effective tax rate):

    

Profit/(loss) before tax (m)

     761       (215     646  

Tax charge expressed as a percentage of profit/(loss) before tax (effective tax rate):

            

- current tax expense only

   27.3%    12.7%    4.9%       18.5%       (35.3%     15.3%  

- total income tax expense (current and deferred)

   16.0%    17.8%    18.3%       23.2%       (37.2%     16.4%  

The following table reconciles the applicable Republic of Ireland statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate (current and deferred) of the Group:

The following table reconciles the applicable Republic of Ireland statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate (current and deferred) of the Group:

   
            % of profit/(loss) before tax 
Irish corporation tax rate     12.5       12.5       12.5  
Higher tax rates on overseas earnings     9.6       17.8       3.1  
Other items (primarily comprising items not chargeable to tax/expenses not deductible for tax):            
- arising from 2013 impairment     -       (70.2     -  
- other items     1.1       2.7       0.8  
Total effective tax rate     23.2       (37.2     16.4  

Other disclosures

Changes in tax rates

The following table reconciles the applicable Republic of Ireland statutorytotal tax ratecharge in future periods will be affected by any changes to the effective tax rate (current and deferred) ofrates in force in the Group:countries in which the Group operates.

   % of profit before tax 

Irish corporation tax rate

   12.5    12.5     12.5  

Higher tax rates on overseas earnings

   4.6    2.7     3.8  
Other items (comprising items not chargeable to tax/expenses not deductible for tax)   (1.1  2.6     2.0  
Total effective tax rate   16.0    17.8     18.3  

130    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. Income Tax Expensecontinued

Factors that may affect future tax charges and other disclosure requirements

Excess of capital allowances over depreciation

The current tax charge will also be impacted by changes in the excess of tax depreciation (capital allowances) over accounting depreciation. Based on current capital investment plans, the Group expects to continue to be in a position to claim capital allowances in excess of depreciation in future years.

Investments in subsidiaries and associates and interests in joint ventures

Given that participation exemptions and tax credits would be available in the context of the Group’s investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures in the majority of the jurisdictions in which the Group operates, the aggregate amount of temporary differences in respect of which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised would be immaterial (with materiality defined in the context of the year-end 2011 financial statements).immaterial.

Proposed dividends

There are no income tax consequences for the Company in respect of dividends proposed prior to issuance of the Consolidated Financial Statements and for which a liability has not been recognised.

Other considerations

The total tax charge in future periods will be affected by any changes to the corporation tax rates in force in the countries in which the Group operates. The current tax charge will also be impacted by changes in the excess of tax depreciation (capital allowances) over accounting depreciation and the use of tax credits.

 

156      CRH


12.11. Dividends

As shown in note 29, the Company has various classes of share capital in issue comprising Ordinary Shares, 5% Cumulative Preference Shares and 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares. The dividends paid and proposed in respect of these classeseach class of share capital are as follows:

 

    

2011

m

  

2010

m

  

2009

m

 

Dividends to shareholders

    

Preference

    

5% Cumulative Preference Shares3,175 (2010:3,175; 2009:3,175)

   -    -    -  

7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares77,521 (2010:77,521; 2009:77,521)

   -    -    -  

Equity

    
Final—44.00c per Ordinary Share in May 2011 (44.00c paid in May 2010; 2009: 43.74c paid in May 2009)   312    307    258  

Interim—paid 18.50c per Ordinary Share (2010: 18.50c; 2009: 18.50c)

   133    131    128  

Total

   445    438    386  

Dividends proposed (memorandum disclosure)

    

Equity

    

Final 2011—proposed 44.00c per Ordinary Share (2010: 44.00c; 2009 44.00c)

   316    312    307  

Reconciliation to Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

    

Dividends to shareholders

   445    438    386  

Less: issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends

   (135  (140  (148

Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company

   310    298    238  

Dividends paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interests

   9    6    7  

Total dividends paid

   319    304    245  

CRH    131


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                                      
      

2014

€m

   

2013

m

   

2012

m

 
Dividends to shareholders        
Preference        
5% Cumulative Preference Shares3,175 (2013:3,175; 2012:3,175)     -     -     -  
7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares77,521 (2013:77,521; 2012:77,521)     -     -     -  
Equity        
Final - paid 44.00c per Ordinary Share (2013: 44.00c; 2012: 44.00c)     323     320     317  
Interim - paid 18.50c per Ordinary Share (2013: 18.50c; 2012: 18.50c)     137     135     133  
Total     460     455     450  
Dividends proposed (memorandum disclosure)        
Equity        
Final 2014 - proposed 44.00c per Ordinary Share (2013: 44.00c; 2012: 44.00c)     359     323     320  
Reconciliation to Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows        
Dividends to shareholders     460     455     450  
Less: issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends (note 28)     (107   (88   (88
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company     353     367     362  
Dividends paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interests     4     1     4  
Total dividends paid     357     368     366  

 

 

13.12. Earnings per Ordinary Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per Ordinary Share is set out below:

 

                                                      
 

2011

m

 

2010

m

 

2009

m

     

2014

€m

   

2013

m

   

2012

m

 

Numerator computations - basic and diluted earnings per Ordinary Share

   

Group profit for the financial year

  597    439    598  
Numerator computations        
Group profit/(loss) for the financial year     584     (295   540  

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests

  (7  (7  (6     (2   (1   (2

Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company

  590    432    592  
Profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company     582     (296   538  

Preference dividends

  -    -    -       -     -     -  
Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company - numerator for
basic/diluted earnings per Ordinary Share
  590    432    592  
Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company - numerator for basic/diluted earnings per Ordinary Share     582     (296   538  

Denominator computations

           

Denominator for basic earnings per Ordinary Share

           

Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares (millions) outstanding for the year (i)

  714.4    704.6    670.8       737.6     729.2     721.9  
Effect of dilutive potential Ordinary Shares (employee share options) (millions) (i) and (ii)  0.3    1.0    2.7       0.7     -     0.3  

Denominator for diluted earnings per Ordinary Share

  714.7    705.6    673.5       738.3     729.2     722.2  

Basic earnings per Ordinary Share

  82.6c    61.3c    88.3c  

Basic earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share

     78.9c     (40.6c   74.6c  

Diluted earnings per Ordinary Share

  82.6c    61.2c    87.9c  

Diluted earnings/(loss) per Ordinary Share

     78.8c     (40.6c   74.5c  

 

(i)Basic and diluted earnings per Ordinary Share:

The weighted average number of Ordinary Shares included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per Ordinary Share has been adjusted to exclude shares held by the Employee Benefit Trust and Ordinary Shares repurchased and held by the Company (CRH plc) as Treasury Shares given that these shares do not rank for dividend. The number of Ordinary Shares so held at the balance sheet date is detailed in note 29.28.

 

(ii)The issue of certain Ordinary Shares in respect of employee share options and Performance Share Plan awards is contingent upon the satisfaction of specified performance conditions in addition to the passage of time. In accordance with IAS 33Earnings per Share, these contingently

Contingently issuable Ordinary Shares (totalling 21,429,06119,062,236 at 31 December 2011, 18,485,1962014, 24,282,615 at 31 December 20102013 and 15,851,55624,856,007 at 31 December 2009)2012) are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per Ordinary Share where the conditions governing exercisability have not been satisfied as at the end of the reporting period.period or they are antidilutive for the periods presented.

Subsequent to year end the Group completed a share placing. Further details are set out in note 33.

132    CRH

LOGO

CRH      157


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14.13. Property, Plant and Equipment

 

 Land and
buildings 
(i)
m
 Plant and
machinery
m
 Transport
m
 Assets in
course of
construction
m
 Total
m
   

Land and

buildings (i)

€m

 

Plant and

machinery

€m

 

Assets in

course of

construction

€m

 

Total

€m

 

At 31 December 2011

     

At 31 December 2014

     

Cost/deemed cost

  6,372    7,899    874    616    15,761     6,068    8,940    220    15,228  
Accumulated depreciation (and impairment charges)  (1,587  (4,637  (601  -    (6,825   (1,892  (5,914  -    (7,806

Net carrying amount

  4,785    3,262    273    616    8,936     4,176    3,026    220    7,422  

At 1 January 2011, net carrying amount

  4,775    3,323    268    526    8,892  

At 1 January 2014, net carrying amount

   4,096    3,214    229    7,539  

Translation adjustment

  45    20    8    -    73     329    64    1    394  

Reclassifications

  51    47    39    (137  -     66    34    (100  -  

Additions at cost (ii)

  64    252    32    228    576  

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  140    185    14    -    339  

Additions at cost

   45    264    126    435  

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   20    71    -    91  

Disposals at net carrying amount

  (129  (62  (10  (1  (202   (68  (27  -    (95

Reclassified as held for sale

   (173  (88  (1  (262

Depreciation charge for year

  (153  (495  (78  -    (726   (132  (499  -    (631

Impairment charge for year (iii)

  (8  (8  -    -    (16
At 31 December 2011, net carrying amount  4,785    3,262    273    616    8,936  

Impairment charge for year (ii)

   (7  (7  (35  (49

At 31 December 2014, net carrying amount

   4,176    3,026    220    7,422  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

        

At 31 December 2010

     

At 31 December 2013

     

Cost/deemed cost

  6,170    7,618    828    526    15,142     5,912    8,847    229    14,988  
Accumulated depreciation (and impairment charges)  (1,395  (4,295  (560  -    (6,250   (1,816  (5,633  -    (7,449

Net carrying amount

  4,775    3,323    268    526    8,892     4,096    3,214    229    7,539  

At 1 January 2010, net carrying amount

  4,465    3,355    299    416    8,535  

At 1 January 2013, net carrying amount

   4,313    3,371    287    7,971  

Translation adjustment

  262    183    20    24    489     (129  (114  (8  (251

Reclassifications

  36    93    (2  (127  -     7    144    (151  -  

Additions at cost (ii)

  50    193    17    206    466  

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  171    109    33    8    321  

Additions at cost

   46    350    101    497  

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   132    210    -    342  

Disposals at net carrying amount

  (51  (66  (15  (1  (133   (30  (44  -    (74

Depreciation charge for year

  (151  (536  (84  -    (771   (132  (539  -    (671

Impairment charge for year (iii)

  (7  (8  -    -    (15   (111  (164  -    (275
At 31 December 2010, net carrying amount  4,775    3,323    268    526    8,892  

At 31 December 2013, net carrying amount

   4,096    3,214    229    7,539  

At 1 January 2010

     

At 1 January 2013

     

Cost/deemed cost

  5,710    7,113    803    416    14,042     5,838    8,694    287        14,819  

Accumulated depreciation

  (1,245  (3,758  (504  -    (5,507

Accumulated depreciation (and impairment charges)

   (1,525  (5,323  -    (6,848

Net carrying amount

  4,465    3,355    299    416    8,535     4,313    3,371    287    7,971  

 

(i)

The carrying value of mineral-bearing land included in the land and buildings category above amounted to2,0871,997 million at the balance sheet date (2010:(2013:1,9741,824 million).

 

(ii)

The impairment charge ofBorrowing costs capitalised during49 million in 2014, of which47 million has been charged against cost of sales (see note 2), relates to the financial year amounted towrite down of property, plant and equipment in Europe Heavyside (8 million (2010:35 million) and Americas Products (9 million; 2009:1014 million). The average capitalisation rate employed to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation was 5.5% (2010: 5.5%; 2009: 5.5%).

 

(iii)

The property, plant and equipment impairment charge for 2011 of16275 million (2010:in 2013, of which15 million; 2009:30 million) represents charges across271 million was charged against cost of sales (see note 2), arose primarily from a numberGroup-wide portfolio review initiated in November 2013; further details of business unitsthis, and of the related impairment of intangible assets in the Group, none2013, are set out in section (b) of which is individually material.note 14.

CRH    133


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14. Property, Plant and Equipmentcontinued

Assets held under finance leases

The net carrying amount and the depreciation charge during the period in respect of assets held under finance leases were not material to the Group.

Future purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment

 

  2011
m
   2010
m
   

2014

€m

   

2013

m

 

Contracted for but not provided in the financial statements

   198     305     211                 155  

Authorised by the Directors but not contracted for

   183     143     70     91  

 

158      CRH


15.14. Intangible Assets

 

   Other intangible assets       Other intangible assets   
 Goodwill
m
 Marketing-
related
m
 Customer-
related
(i)
m
 Contract-
based
m
 Total
m
   

Goodwill

€m

 

Marketing-

related

€m

 

Customer-

related (i)

€m

 

Contract-

based

€m

 

Total

€m

 

At 31 December 2011

     

At 31 December 2014

      

Cost/deemed cost

  4,358    44    361    24    4,787     4,362    52    448    37    4,899  
Accumulated amortisation (and impairment charges)  (57  (30  (200  (12  (299   (344  (40  (322  (20  (726

Net carrying amount

  4,301    14    161    12    4,488     4,018    12    126    17    4,173  

At 1 January 2011, net carrying amount

  4,113    17    161    14    4,305  

At 1 January 2014, net carrying amount

   3,734    12    151    14    3,911  

Translation adjustment

  50    -    5    -    55     279    3    6    1    289  

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  207    1    27    1    236  

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   31    2    10    4    47  

Disposals

  (65  -    -    -    (65   (10  (1  (2  -    (13

Reclassified as held for sale

   (16  -    (1  -    (17

Amortisation charge for year

  -    (4  (32  (2  (38   -    (4  (38  (2  (44

Impairment charge for year

  (4  -    -    (1  (5

At 31 December 2011, net carrying amount

  4,301    14    161    12    4,488  

At 31 December 2014, net carrying amount

   4,018    12    126    17    4,173  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

          

At 31 December 2010

     

At 31 December 2013

      

Cost/deemed cost

  4,223    42    327    23    4,615     4,158    48    420    31    4,657  
Accumulated amortisation (and impairment charges)  (110  (25  (166  (9  (310   (424  (36  (269  (17  (746

Net carrying amount

  4,113    17    161    14    4,305     3,734    12    151    14    3,911  

At 1 January 2010, net carrying amount

  3,919    15    146    15    4,095  

At 1 January 2013, net carrying amount

   4,067    17    177    6    4,267  

Translation adjustment

  206    1    14    1    222     (117  (1  (2  (1  (121

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  82    5    40    -    127  

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   169    1    20    18    208  

Disposals

  (7  -    (1)    -    (8   (12  -    -    (2  (14

Amortisation charge for year

  -    (4  (38  (2  (44   -    (5  (42  (7  (54

Impairment charge for year

  (87  -    -    -    (87   (373  -    (2  -    (375

At 31 December 2010, net carrying amount

  4,113    17    161    14    4,305  

At 31 December 2013, net carrying amount

   3,734    12    151    14    3,911  

At 1 January 2010

     

At 1 January 2013

      

Cost/deemed cost

  3,976    35    274    22    4,307     4,122    51    413    17    4,603  
Accumulated amortisation (and impairment charges)  (57  (20  (128  (7  (212   (55  (34  (236  (11  (336

Net carrying amount

  3,919    15    146    15    4,095     4,067    17    177    6    4,267  

 

(i)

The customer-related intangible assets relate predominantly to non-contractual customer relationships.

134    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15. Intangible Assetscontinued

Goodwill(a) Annual goodwill testing

The net book value of goodwill capitalised under previous GAAP (Irish GAAP) as at the transition date to IFRS (1 January 2004) has been treated as deemed cost. Goodwill arising on acquisition since that date is capitalised at cost.

Cash-generating units

Goodwill acquired through business combination activity has been allocated to cash-generating units (CGUs) that are expected to benefit from synergies in that combination. The cash-generating units represent the lowest level within the Group at which the associated goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes, and are not larger than the operating segments determined in accordance with IFRS 8Operating Segments. A total of 27 (2010: 30)20 (2013: 19) cash-generating units have been identified and these are analysed between the six business segments in the Group below. The reductionincrease in the number of CGUs in 20112014 relates to a number of organisational changes in our US businesses.Europe segments. As a result, a number of entities have been added to the Benelux CGU in Europe Heavyside, two new CGUs have been added (Germany - Europe Heavyside and Europe Lightside) and the Europe Products CGU has been removed. All businesses within the various cash-generating units exhibit similar and/or consistent profit margin and asset intensity characteristics. Assets, liabilities, deferred tax and goodwill have been assigned to the CGUs on a reasonable and consistent basis.

Significant under-performance in any of CRH’s major cash-generating units may give rise to a material write-down of goodwill which would have a substantial impact on the Group’s income and equity.

 

  Cash-generating units   Goodwill  (m)   Cash-generating units     Goodwill (€m) 
  2011   2010           2011           2010   2014   2013       2014   2013 

Europe Materials

   11     11     858     782  

Europe Products

   3     3     615     676  

Europe Heavyside*

   8     7                 650     697  

Europe Lightside*

   1     1      346     313  

Europe Distribution

   1     1     641     622     1     1      649     641  

Europe

   10     9       1,645     1,651  

Americas Materials

   8     9     1,234     1,136     7     7      1,313     1,151  

Americas Products

   3     5     627     610     2     2      703     618  

Americas Distribution

   1     1     326     287     1     1      357     314  

Total cash-generating units

   27     30     4,301     4,113  

Americas

   10     10       2,373     2,083  

Total Group

   20     19       4,018             3,734  

*

Included in the goodwill numbers of Europe Heavyside and Europe Lightside at 31 December 2014 are amounts of €54 million and €9 million respectively (2013: €53 million and €9 million respectively) relating to businesses identified for divestment as part of the portfolio review, which have been tested separately (see section (b) below).

LOGO

CRH      159


LOGO     

14. Intangible Assets|continued

Impairment testing methodology and results

Goodwill is subject to impairment testing on an annual basis. The recoverable amount of each of the 2720 CGUs is determined based on a value-in-use computation, which isusing Level 3 inputs in accordance with the only methodology applied by the Group and which has been selected due to the impracticality of obtaining fair value less costs to sell measurements for each reporting period.hierarchy. The cash flow forecasts are primarily based on a five-year strategic plan document formally approved by senior management and the Board of Directors and specifically exclude the impact of future development activity. These cash flows are projected forward for an additional five years to determine the basis for an annuity-based terminal value, calculated on the same basis as the Group’s acquisition modelling methodology. As in prior years, the terminal value is based on a 20-year annuity, with the exception of certain long-lived cement assets, where an assumption of a 40-year annuity has been used.annuity. The projected cash flows assume zero growth in real cash flows beyond the initial evaluation period. The value-in-use represents the present value of the future cash flows, including the terminal value, discounted at a rate appropriate to each CGU. The real pre-tax discount rates used range from 7.0%7.5% to 11.8% (2010: 7.4%12.2% (2013: 7.8% to 12.4%11.7%); these rates are in line with the Group’s estimated weighted average cost of capital, arrived at using the Capital Asset Pricing Model.

The 2014 annual goodwill impairment testing process has resulted in no intangible asset impairments. The 2013 annual impairment testing process resulted in an impairment of58 million being recorded in respect of our Benelux CGU in Europe Heavyside due to a difficult trading environment in 2013 and a slower recovery than previously anticipated. The assumptions underlying the 2013 value-in-use model projections resulted in a present value (using a real pre-tax discount rate of 9.4%) of241 million and a related goodwill impairment being recorded of58 million.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The cash flows have been arrived at taking account of the Group’s strong financial position, its established history of earnings and cash flow generation and the nature of the building materials industry, where product obsolescence is very low. However, expected future cash flows are inherently uncertain and are therefore liable to material change over time. The key assumptions employed in arriving at the estimates of future cash flows factored into impairment testing are subjective and include projected EBITDA (as defined)* margins, net cash flows, discount rates used and the duration of the discounted cash flow model.

*Defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’ profit after tax.

CRH    135


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15. Intangible Assetscontinued

Significant goodwill amounts

The goodwill allocated to the Europe Distribution and the Oldcastle Building Products (Americas Products segment) CGUs accounts for between 10% and 20% of the total carrying amount of4,3014,018 million. The goodwill allocated to each of the remaining CGUs is less than 10% of the total carrying value in all other cases. The additional disclosures required for the 2two CGUs with significant goodwill are as follows:

 

  Oldcastle
Building Products
   Europe Distribution   Europe Distribution       Oldcastle
Building Products
 
  2011**   2011   2010    2014     2013        2014     2013  
Carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit at balance sheet date   465m     641m     622m  

Goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit at balance sheet date

   €649m     641m       €699m     615m  

Discount rate applied to the cash flow projections (real pre-tax)

   11.5%     9.7%     10.1%     9.4%     9.4%       11.9%     11.7%  
Average EBITDA (as defined)* margin over the initial 5-year period   10.7%     7.3%     6.6%     5.9%     6.4%       11.0%     10.6%  

Value-in-use (present value of future cash flows)

   1,669m     2,306m     1,781m     €2,015m     2,201m                  €2,588m     2,380m  

Excess of value-in-use over carrying amount

   150m     646m     280m     €336m     431m       €509m     579m  

The key assumptions and methodology used in respect of these two CGUs are consistent with those described above. The values applied to each of the key estimates and assumptions are specific to the individual CGUs and were derived from a combination of internal and external factors based on historical experience and took into account the cash flows specifically associated with these businesses. The cash flows and 20-year annuity-based terminal value were projected in line with the methodology disclosed above.

Europe Distribution isand Oldcastle Building Products are not one ofincluded in the CGUs referred to in the “Sensitivity analysis” section.section below. Given the magnitude of the excess of value-in-use over carrying amount, and our belief that the key assumptions are reasonable, management believe that it is not reasonably possible that there would be a change in the key assumptions such that the carrying amount would exceed the value-in-use. Consequently no further disclosures relating to sensitivity of the value-in-use computations for the Europe Distribution CGUor Oldcastle Building Products CGUs are considered to be warranted. Sensitivity analysis for Oldcastle Building Products is presented below.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis has been performed and results in additional disclosures in respect of 62 of the 2720 CGUs. The key assumptions, methodology used and values applied to each of the key assumptions for thesethe two cash-generating units are in line with those outlined above. These 6The two CGUs had aggregate goodwill of1,243178 million at the date of testing. The table below identifies the amounts by which each of the following assumptions may either decline or increase to arrive at a zero excess of the present value of future cash flows over the book value of net assets in the 6two CGUs selected for sensitivity analysis testing:disclosures:

 

   Oldcastle
Building Products
Remaining 52 CGUs 

Reduction in EBITDA (as defined)* margin

   0.8 percentage points0.91.3 to 1.72.0 percentage points  

Reduction in profit before tax

   10.7%6.9%8.6% to 17.6%15.9%  

Reduction in net cash flow

   14.7%6.3%7.9% to 15.7%13.6%  

Increase in pre-tax discount rate

   1.5 percentage points1.00.7 to 2.61.4 percentage points  

The average EBITDA (as defined)* margin for the aggregate of these 6two CGUs over the initial 5-year period was 11%9.2%. The aggregate value-in-use (being the present value of the future net cash flows) was4,229619 million and the aggregate carrying amount was3,781542 million, resulting in an aggregate excess of value-in-use over carrying amount of44877 million.

While the Ukraine CGU is not considered to require additional sensitivity-related disclosures based on analysis performed, the country’s ongoing political situation remains uncertain. CRH’s activities in Ukraine are mainly located in the west of the country and are therefore not directly affected by the continuing conflict; however, the economic outlook for the country as a whole remains unclear. The net asset value of the Ukrainian CGU amounts to267 million at year-end 2014.

 

*Defined

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of associates’equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

160      CRH


14. Intangible Assets|continued

(b) Portfolio review update

In November 2013, a Group-wide portfolio review was initiated to identify and focus on those businesses within our portfolio which offer the most attractive future returns, and to prioritise capital allocation to ensure profitable growth across our network of businesses. This review was completed during the year and a multi-year divestment programme has commenced with proceeds of0.35 billion realised on business and non-current asset disposals in 2014 (see note 4).

The decision to divest of these business units resulted in the need to assess them for impairment, either individually or combined where they form a new group for disposal purposes. Excluding business units divested during 2014, the remainder were assessed for impairment or reversal of previous impairments and also assessed from the perspective of the held for sale criteria set out in IFRS 5Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (see note 4).

A valuation was prepared based on the estimated fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD) for each business unit. The valuations were then compared to the carrying value of each business and where that valuation fell below the carrying value an impairment charge was taken.

No goodwill impairments or reversal of previous impairments were recorded during the year.

In 2013, the total impairments (including financial asset impairments) arising from the portfolio review amounted to683 million, of which261 million related to property, plant and equipment (see note 13) and317 million related to intangible assets. The largest impairments in 2013 arose in two business units within Europe Heavyside. Both businesses serve the residential new-build sector in mature markets. Financial asset impairments of105 million were recorded in 2013 relating to two Europe Heavyside equity accounted investments. The additional disclosures required are as follows:

   Business 1     Business 2     Financial Assets 
    2013      2013      2013 

Amount of impairment loss recognised in 2013

   99m      75m      105m  

Description of valuation technique

   Income-based      Income-based      Income-based  

Level of fair value hierarchy

   Level 3      Level 3      Level 3  

Recoverable amount (FVLCD)

   182m      34m      172m  

Discount rate applicable to cash flow projections (real pre-tax)

   8.9%      9.2%      9.2% - 9.8%  

Average EBITDA (as defined)* margin over initial 5-year period

   13.5%      13.7%      20.1% - 22.5%  

*

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, asset impairment charges, profit on disposals and the Group’s share of equity accounted investments’ result after tax.

 

LOGO

**Comparative information for Oldcastle Building Products is unavailable due to the 2011 organisational changes referred to above.
CRH      161


LOGO

136    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16.15. Financial Assets

 

  Investments accounted for using the equity method
(i.e. associates)
     Investments accounted for
using the equity method
(i.e. joint ventures and associates)
     
  

Share of net
assets

m

 

Goodwill

m

 

Loans

m

 

Total

m

 

Other (i)

m

   

Share of net

assets

€m

 

Loans

€m

 

Total

€m

 

Asset held

for sale

€m

 

Other (i)

€m

 

At 1 January 2011

   732    294    11    1,037    149  

At 1 January 2014

   1,211    129    1,340    -    23  

Translation adjustment

   20    10    -    30    4     73    14    87    -    -  

Investments and advances

   8    -    1    9    15     -    3    3    -    -  

Disposals and repayments

   (59  (69  (3  (131  (10   (82  (10  (92  -    -  

Reclassifications

   (19  -    -    (19  81  

Reclassified as held for sale

   (34  -    (34  -    -  

Retained profit

   33    (11  -    22    -     25    -    25    -    -  

At 31 December 2011

   715    224    9    948    239  

At 31 December 2014

   1,193    136    1,329    -    23  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

    

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

 

At 1 January 2010

   670    289    3    962    128  

At 1 January 2013

   1,291    131    1,422    143    34  

Translation adjustment

   33    11    1    45    8     (72  (5  (77  (1  (1

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

   4    -    -    4    2  

Investments and advances

   26    16    7    49    18     64    10    74    -    4  

Disposals and repayments

   -    -    -    -    (7   -    (7  (7  (139  (14

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   2    -    2    -    -  

Retained loss

   (1  (22  -    (23  -     (74  -    (74  (3  -  

At 31 December 2010

   732    294    11    1,037    149  

At 31 December 2013

   1,211    129    1,340    -    23  

The total(i) Other financial assets primarily comprise trade investments carried at historical cost.

Summarised financial information for the Group’s investment in joint ventures and associates which are accounted for using the equity method is analysed as follows:

 

  Joint Ventures   Associates   Total 
  

2011

m

 

2010

m

   

2014

€m

   

2013

m

   

2014

€m

   

2013

m

   

2014

€m

   

2013

m

 

Non-current assets

   1,245    1,321     548     600     955     862     1,503     1,462  

Current assets

   632    718     121  ��  176     538     557     659     733  

Non-current liabilities

   (402  (458   (161   (174   (209   (230   (370   (404

Current liabilities

   (527  (544   (73   (106   (526   (474   (599   (580

Net assets

   948    1,037     435                 496               758                     715                 1,193           1,211  

A listing of the principal associatesequity accounted investments is contained in Exhibit 8 to thisthe Annual Report.

The Group holds a 21.13% stake (2010:(2013: 21.13%) in Samse S.A., a publicly-quotedpublicly-listed distributor of building materials to the merchanting sector in France which is accounted for as an associate investment above. The fair value of this investment was41 million (2010:45 million) as at the balance sheet date.date, calculated based on the number of shares held multiplied by the closing share price at 31 December 2014 (Level 1 input in the fair value hierarchy), was75 million (2013:58 million).

162      CRH


16. Inventories

The Group completed its annual impairment assessment of its investments in associates; no impairments were recorded as a result of this review.

    

2014

€m

     

2013

m

 

Raw materials

   612       606  

Work-in-progress (i)

   80       86  

Finished goods

   1,568       1,562  

Total inventories at the lower of cost and net realisable value

   2,260       2,254  

 

(i)Other financial assets primarily comprise loans extended by the Group to joint ventures, trade investments carried at historical cost and other non-current assets. The balance in respect of loans to joint ventures as at 31 December 2011 was141 million (2010:132 million).

CRH    137


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17. Inventories

    2011
m
   2010
m
 

Raw materials

   648     622  

Work-in-progress (i)

   88     102  

Finished goods

   1,550     1,463  

Total inventories at the lower of cost and net realisable value

   2,286     2,187  

(i)Work-in-progress includes8 million (2010:(2013:2 million) in respect of the cumulative costs incurred, net of amounts transferred to cost of sales under percentage-of-completion accounting, for construction contracts in progress at the balance sheet date.

An analysis of the Group’s cost of sales expense is provided in note 32 to the financial statements.

Write-downs of inventories recognised as an expense within cost of sales amounted to1429 million (2010:(2013:2319 million; 2009:2012:4112 million).

None of the above carrying amounts has been pledged as security for liabilities entered into by the Group.

 

 

18.17. Trade and Other Receivables

 

  2011
m
 2010
m
   

2014

€m

     

2013

m

 

Current

      

Trade receivables

   1,879    1,700     1,810       1,725  

Amounts receivable in respect of construction contracts (i)

   417    342     476       422  

Total trade receivables, gross

   2,296    2,042     2,286       2,147  

Provision for impairment

   (153  (151   (106     (118

Total trade receivables, net

   2,143    1,891     2,180       2,029  

Other receivables (ii)

   357    409  

Amounts receivable from associates

   2    1  

Prepayments and accrued income

   161    118  

Amounts receivable from equity accounted investments

   6       4  

Prepayments and other receivables

   458       483  

Total

   2,663    2,419     2,644       2,516  

Non-current

      

Other receivables

   85       93  

The carrying amounts of current and non-current trade and other receivables approximate their fair value largely due to the short-term maturities and nature of these instruments.

 

(i)

Includes unbilled revenue at the balance sheet date in respect of construction contracts amounting to121 million (2010:90 million).

(ii)Other receivables includeand retentions held by customers in respect of construction contracts at the balance sheet date amounting to70119 million (2010:and84 million)82 million respectively (2013:121 million and63 million respectively).

Valuation and qualifying accounts (provision for impairment)

The movements in the provision for impairment of receivables during the financial year were as follows:

 

  2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
   

2014

€m

     

2013

m

     

2012

m

 

At 1 January

   151    158    161     118       123       136  

Translation adjustment

   1    7    (1   4       (2     -  

Provided during year

   56    50    71     28       36       40  

Written-off during year

   (50  (56  (68   (36     (33     (50

Recovered during year

   (5  (8  (5   (6     (6     (3

Reclassified as held for sale

   (2     -       -  

At 31 December

   153    151    158     106       118           123  

Information in relation to the Group’s credit risk management is provided in note 21 to the financial statements.

138    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18. Trade and Other Receivablescontinued

Aged analysis

The aged analysis of gross trade receivables and amounts receivable in respect of construction contracts at the balance sheet date was as follows:

 

   
 
2011
m
  
    
  
 
2010
m
  
  
  

2014

€m

     

2013

m

 

Neither past due nor impaired

   1,731    1,522     1,638       1,554  

Past due but not impaired:

         

- less than 60 days

   232    193     373       290  

- 60 days or greater but less than 120 days

   107    100     117       126  

- 120 days or greater

   49    25     45       53  

Past due and impaired (partial or full provision)

   177    202     113       124  

Total

   2,296    2,042     2,286       2,147  

Trade receivables and amounts receivable in respect of construction contracts are in general receivable within 90 days of the balance sheet date.

 

LOGO

CRH      163


LOGO

 

19.18. Trade and Other Payables

 

  2014
€m
     2013
m
 
   
 
2011
m
  
    
  
 
2010
m
  
  

Current

         

Trade payables

   1,579    1,376     1,506       1,495  

Construction contract-related payables (i)

   120    163     129       103  

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration

   28    26  

Other payables

   404    403  

Accruals and deferred income

   683    672  

Amounts payable to associates

   44    46  

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration (ii)

   59       24  

Accruals and other payables

   1,148       1,093  

Amounts payable to equity accounted investments

   52       39  

Total

   2,858    2,686     2,894       2,754  

Non-current

         

Other payables

   81    70     109       105  

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration (stated at net present cost) due as follows:

   

- between one and two years

   33    18  

- between two and five years

   61    46  

- after five years

   29    29  

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration (ii)

   148       184  

Total

   204    163     257       289  

 

(i)

Construction contract-related payables include billings in excess of costs incurredrevenue, together with advances received from customers in respect of work to be performed under construction contracts and foreseeable losses thereon.

Other than deferred and contingent consideration, the carrying amounts of trade and other payables approximate their fair value largely due to the short-term maturities and nature of these instruments.

 

(ii)

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration

The fair value of total contingent consideration is122 million (2013:120 million), (Level 3 input in the fair value hierarchy) and deferred consideration is85 million (2013:88 million). On an undiscounted basis, the corresponding basis for which the Group may be liable for contingent consideration ranges fromnil million to a maximum of145 million. The movement in deferred and contingent consideration during the financial year was as follows:

CRH    139


Consolidated Financial Statements

At 1 January

   208       297  

Translation adjustment

   16       (9

Arising on acquisitions and investments during year (note 30)

   3       17  

Changes in estimate

   (6     (3

Paid during year

   (26     (105

Discount unwinding

   12       11  

At 31 December

   207       208  

 

164      CRH


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.19. Movement in Working Capital and Provisions for Liabilities

 

   Inventories
m
  Trade and
other
receivables
m
  Trade
and other
payables
m
  Provisions
for
liabilities
m
  Total
m
 

At 1 January 2011

  2,187    2,419    (2,849  (387  1,370  

Translation adjustment

  32    38    (38  (7  25  

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  53    62    (49  (15  51  

Disposals

  (55  (90  102    8    (35

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:

  

    

- arising on acquisitions during year (note 31)

  -    -    (42  -    (42

- paid during year

  -    -    21    -    21  

Interest accruals and discount unwinding

  -    1    (11  (15  (25

Reclassifications

  -    (62  -    -    (62
Increase/(decrease) in working capital and provisions for liabilities  69    295    (196  43    211  

At 31 December 2011

  2,286    2,663    (3,062  (373  1,514  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior years are as follows:

  

    

At 1 January 2010

  2,008    2,454    (2,638  (360  1,464  

Translation adjustment

  101    138    (137  (20  82  

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  92    80    (64  (7  101  

Disposals

  (30  (17  29    1    (17

Movement in finance-related receivables

  -    (115  -    -    (115

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:

  

    

- arising on acquisitions during year (note 31)

  -    -    (23  -    (23

- paid during year

  -    -    27    -    27  

Interest accruals and discount unwinding

  -    2    6    (15  (7
Increase/(decrease) in working capital and provisions for liabilities  16    (123  (49  14    (142

At 31 December 2010

  2,187    2,419    (2,849  (387  1,370  

At 1 January 2009

  2,473    3,096    (3,070  (389  2,110  

Translation adjustment

  (34  (31  14    4    (47

Arising on acquisition (note 31)

  11    22    (14  (1  18  

Movement in finance-related receivables

  -    115    -    -    115  

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:

  

    

- arising on acquisitions during the year (note 31)

  -    -    (8  -    (8

- paid during the year

  -    -    37    -    37  

Interest accruals and discount unwinding

  -    4    (10  (15  (21
(Decrease)/increase in working capital and provisions for liabilities  (442  (752  413    41    (740

At 31 December 2009

  2,008    2,454    (2,638  (360  1,464  
    

Inventories

€m

  

Trade

and other

receivables

€m

  

Trade

and other

payables

€m

  

Provisions

for

liabilities

€m

  

Total

€m

 
At 1 January 2014   2,254    2,609    (3,043  (380  1,440  
Translation adjustment   128    165    (173  (27  93  
Arising on acquisition (note 30)   23    20    (17  (1  25  
Disposals   (9  (4  2    -    (11
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:      
- arising on acquisitions during year (note 30)   -    -    (3  -    (3
- paid during year   -    -    26    -    26  
Reclassified as held for sale   (102  (79  98    7    (76
Interest accruals and discount unwinding   -    -    (1  (16  (17
(Decrease)/increase in working capital and provisions for liabilities   (34  18    (40  21    (35
At 31 December 2014   2,260    2,729    (3,151  (396  1,442  
The equivalent disclosure for the prior years is as follows:      
At 1 January 2013   2,333    2,603    (3,052  (366  1,518  
Translation adjustment   (74  (80  91    9    (54
Arising on acquisition (note 30)   41    53    (80  (14  -  
Disposals   (9  (4  7    -    (6
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:      
- arising on acquisitions during year (note 30)   -    -    (17  -    (17
- paid during year   -    -    105    -    105  
Interest accruals and discount unwinding   -    -    (14  (15  (29
(Decrease)/increase in working capital and provisions for liabilities   (37  37    (83  6    (77
At 31 December 2013   2,254    2,609    (3,043  (380  1,440  
At 1 January 2012   2,179    2,602    (2,901  (365  1,515  
Translation adjustment   (15  (5  8    2    (10
Arising on acquisition (note 30)   98    103    (57  (1  143  
Disposals   (22  (23  23    1    (21
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration:      
- arising on acquisitions during year (note 30)   -    -    (151  -    (151
- paid during year   -    -    30    -    30  
Interest accruals and discount unwinding   -    -    (31  (15  (46
Increase/(decrease) in working capital and provisions for liabilities   93    (74  27    12    58  
At 31 December 2012   2,333    2,603    (3,052  (366  1,518  

 

140    CRHLOGO

CRH      165


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS20. Analysis of Net Debt

Components of net debt

Net debt is a non-GAAP measure which we provide to investors as we believe they find it useful. Net debt comprises cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities and interest-bearing loans and borrowings and enables investors to see the economic effects of these in total (see note 21 for details of the capital and risk management policies employed by the Group). Net debt is commonly used in computations such as net debt as a % of total equity and net debt as a % of market capitalisation.

 

   As at 31 December 2014     As at 31 December 2013 
    

Fair value (i)

€m

  Book value
€m
      Fair value (i)
m
  Book value
m
 

Cash and cash equivalents (note 22)

   3,295    3,295      2,540    2,540  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (note 23)

   (6,302  (5,866    (5,799  (5,540

Derivative financial instruments (net) (note 24)

   79    79       27    27  

Group net debt

   (2,928  (2,492     (3,232  (2,973

(i) All interest-bearing loans and borrowings are Level 2 fair value measurements.

The following table shows the effective interest rates on period-end fixed, gross and net debt:

 

  As at 31 December 2014    As at 31 December 2013 
   €m  

Interest

rate

  

Weighted average
fixed period

Years

     m  Interest
rate
  

Weighted average
fixed period

Years

 
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings nominal - fixed rate (i)  (5,657     (5,362  
Derivative financial instruments - fixed rate  1,227              1,518          
Net fixed rate debt including derivatives  (4,430  4.5%    5.2     (3,844  5.5%    5.1  
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings nominal - floating rate (ii)  (63     (54  
Adjustment of debt from nominal to book value (i)  (146     (124  
Derivative financial instruments - currency floating rate  (1,148            (1,491        
Gross debt including derivative financial instruments  (5,787  4.1%      (5,513  4.6%   
Cash and cash equivalents - floating rate  3,295              2,540          
Group net debt  (2,492     (2,973  
Cash at bank and in hand reclassified as held for sale (note 22)  (33            -          
Group net debt excluding cash reclassified as held for sale  (2,525            (2,973        

(i)

Of the Group’s nominal fixed rate debt at 31 December 2014,1,616 million (2013:1,882 million) was hedged to floating rate at inception using interest rate swaps. The balance of nominal fixed rate debt of4,041 million (2013:3,480 million) pertains to financial liabilities measured at amortised cost in accordance with IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

(ii)

Floating rate debt comprises bank borrowings and finance leases bearing interest at rates set in advance for periods ranging from overnight to less than one year largely by reference to inter-bank interest rates.

Reconciliation of opening to closing net debt

    2014
€m
     2013
m
     2012
m
 

At 1 January

   (2,973     (2,909     (3,335

Debt in acquired companies

   (7     (44     (42

Debt in disposed companies

   -       17       2  

Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   (901     (1,491     (487

Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments

   11       (64     (13

Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   934       586       394  

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

   625       845       524  

Mark-to-market adjustment

   (3     10       9  

Translation adjustment

   (178     77       39  

At 31 December

   (2,492     (2,973     (2,909

166      CRH


20. Analysis of Net Debt|continued

Currency profile

The currency profile of the Group’s net debt and net worth (capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders) as at 31 December 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

    euro
€m
  US
Dollar
€m
  Pound
Sterling
€m
  Swiss
Franc
€m
  Other (iii)
€m
  Total
€m
 
Group net debt* by major currency   (871  (1,117  (68  (250  (219  (2,525
Non-debt assets (including cash reclassified as held for sale) and liabilities analysed as follows:       
Non-current assets   3,061    7,003    346    778    2,015    13,203  
Current assets   1,611    2,558    489    326    466    5,450  
Non-current liabilities   (616  (1,481  (92  (270  (71  (2,530
Current liabilities   (1,117  (1,436  (368  (191  (288  (3,400
Non-controlling interests   (5  (4  -    (12  -    (21
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders   2,063    5,523    307    381    1,903    10,177  
The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:       
Group net debt by major currency   (1,304  (1,476  (57  11    (147  (2,973
Non-debt assets and liabilities analysed as follows:       
Non-current assets   3,378    6,293    433    796    2,113    13,013  
Current assets   1,568    2,138    234    330    526    4,796  
Non-current liabilities   (522  (1,221  (107  (169  (77  (2,096
Current liabilities   (1,126  (1,221  (208  (198  (301  (3,054
Non-controlling interests   (8  (3  -    (12  (1  (24
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders   1,986    4,510    295    758    2,113    9,662  

(iii)

The principal currencies included in this category are the Chinese Renminbi, the Polish Zloty, the Indian Rupee, the Ukrainian Hryvnia, the Canadian Dollar, the Israeli Shekel, the Turkish Lira and the Argentine Peso.

* Excluding €33 million cash reclassified as held for sale which is analysed by major currency in current assets above.

LOGO

CRH      167


LOGO

 

21. Capital and Financial Risk Management

Capital management

Overall summary

The primary objectives of CRH’s capital management strategy are to ensure that the Group maintains a strong credit rating to support its business and to create shareholder value by managing the debt and equity balance and the cost of capital. No changes were made in the objectives, policypolicies or processes for managing capital during either 2011 or 2010.2014.

The Board periodically reviews the capital structure of the Group, including the cost of capital and the risks associated with each class of capital. The Group manages and, if necessary, adjusts its capital structure taking account of underlying economic conditions; any material adjustments to the Group’s capital structure in terms of the relative proportions of debt and equity are approved by the Board. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may issue new shares, dispose of assets, amend investment plans, alter dividend policy or return capital to shareholders. The Group is committed to optimising the use of its balance sheet within the confines of the overall objective to maintain an investment grade credit rating. Dividend cover for the year ended 31 December 2011 amounted to 1.3 times (2010: 1.0 times; 2009: 1.4 times).

The capital structure of the Group, which comprises net debt and capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders, may be summarised as follows:

 

  2014
€m
   2013
m
 
  2011
m
   2010
m
 

Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders

   10,509     10,328     10,177     9,662  

Net debt (note 25)

   3,483     3,473  

Net debt

   2,492     2,973  

Capital and net debt

   13,992     13,801     12,669     12,635  

Financial risk management objectives and policies

The Group uses financial instruments throughout its businesses: interest-bearing loans and borrowings, cash and cash equivalents short-dated liquid investments and finance leases are used to finance the Group’s operations; trade receivables and trade payables arise directly from operations; and derivatives, principally interest rate and currency swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts, are used to manage interest rate risks and currency exposures and to achieve the desired profile of borrowings. The Group does not trade in financial instruments nor does it enter into any leveraged derivative transactions.

The Group’s corporate treasury function provides services to the business units, co-ordinates access to domestic and international financial markets, and monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Group. The Head of Group FinanceFinancial Operations reports to the General Manager of Finance Director and the activities of the corporate treasury function are subject to regular internal audit. Systems are in place to monitor and control the Group’s liquidity risks. The Group’s net debt position forms part of the monthly documentation presented to the Board of Directors.

The main risks attaching to the Group’s financial instruments are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. Commodity price risk arising from financial instruments is of minimal relevance given that exposure is confined to a small number of contracts entered into for the purpose of hedging future movements in energy costs. The Board reviews and agrees policies for the prudent management of each of these risks as documented below.

Interest rate risk

The Group’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates stems predominantly from its long-term debt obligations. Interest cost is managed by the Group’s corporate treasury function using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt. With the objective of managing this mix in a cost-efficient manner, the Group enters into interest rate swaps, under which the Group contracts to exchange, at predetermined intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to a pre-agreed notional principal. Such contracts enable the Group to mitigate the risk of changing interest rates on the fair value of issued fixed rate debt and the cash flow exposures of issued floating rate debt.

CRH    141


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21. Capital and Financial Risk Managementcontinued

The majority of these swaps are designated under IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to hedge underlying debt obligations and qualify for hedge accounting; undesignated financial instruments are termed “not designated as hedges” in the analysis of derivative financial instruments presented in note 24. The following table demonstrates the impact on profitprofit/(loss) before tax and total equity of a range of possible changes in the interest rates applicable to net floating rate borrowings, with all other variables held constant. These impacts are calculated based on the closing balance sheet for the relevant period and assume all floating interest rates and interest curves change by the same amount. For profitprofit/(loss) before tax, the impact shown is the impact on closing balance sheet floating rate net debt for a full year while for total equity the impact shown is the impact on the value of financial instruments.

 

Percentage change in cost of borrowings

    +/- 1%  +/- 0.5%

Impact on profitprofit/(loss) before tax

  20112014  +/- €21m+/- €10m
2013  +/-/+ 8m10m  +/-/+ 4m5m
  20102012  +/-/+ 6m5m  +/-/+ 3m
2009-/+ 8m-/+ 4m

Impact on total equity

  20112014  -/+ €5m-/+ €2m
2013  -/+/- 2m8m  -/+/- 1m4m
  20102012  +/-/+ 5m1m  +/- -/+ 3m0.5m

168      CRH  2009-/+ 5m-/+ 3m


21. Capital and Financial Risk Management|continued

Foreign currency risk

Due to the nature of building materials, which in general exhibit a low value-to-weight ratio, CRH’s activities are conducted primarily in the local currency of the country of operation resulting in low levels of foreign currency transaction risk; variances arising in this regard are reflected in operating costs or cost of sales in the Consolidated Income Statement in the period in which they arise.

Given the Group’s presence in 3634 countries worldwide, the principal foreign exchange risk arises from fluctuations in the euro value of the Group’s net investment in a wide basket of currencies other than the euro; such changes are reported separately within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. A currency profile of the Group’s net debt and net worth is presented in note 25.20. The Group’s established policy is to spread its net worth across the currencies of its various operations with the objective of limiting its exposure to individual currencies and thus promoting consistency with the geographical balance of its operations. In order to achieve this objective, the Group manages its borrowings, where practicable and cost effective, to hedge a portion of its foreign currency assets. Hedging is done using currency borrowings in the same currency as the assets being hedged or through the use of other hedging methods such as currency swaps.

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of profitprofit/(loss) before tax and equity to selected movements in the relevant US$//US$ exchange rate (with all other variables held constant); the US Dollar has been selected as the appropriate currency for this analysis given the materiality of the Group’s activities in the United States. The impact on profitprofit/(loss) before tax is based on changing the US$//US$ exchange rate used in calculating profitprofit/(loss) before tax for the period. The impact on total equity and financial instruments is calculated by changing the US$//US$ exchange rate used in measuring the closing balance sheet.

 

Percentage change in relevant US$//US$ exchange rate

    +/- 5%  +/- 2.5%

Impact on profitprofit/(loss) before tax

  20112014  -/+ 8m€26m  -/+ 4m€13m
  20102013  -/+ 7m-/+ 4m
2009-/+ 14m-/+7m
  2012-/+ 7m14m-/+7m

Impact on total equity*

  20112014  -/+ €263m-/+ €135m
2013  -/+ 203m215m  -/+ 104m110m
  20102012  -/+ 195m210m  -/+ 100m
2009-/+ 170m-/+ 87m108m

* Includes the impact on financial instruments which is as follows:

  20112014  +/- €53m+/- €27m
2013  +/- 105m70m  +/- 54m36m
  20102012  +/- 92m87m  +/- 47m
2009+/- 105m+/- 54m45m

142    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21. Capital and Financial Risk Managementcontinued

Financial instruments include deposits, money market funds, bank loans, medium term notes and other fixed term debt, interest rate swaps, commodity swaps and foreign exchange contracts. They exclude trade receivables and trade payables.

CreditCredit/counterparty risk

In addition to cash at bank and in hand, the Group holds significant cash balances which are invested on a short-term basis and are classified as either cash equivalents or liquid investments (see note 22). These deposits and other financial instruments (principally certain derivatives and loans and receivables included within financial assets) give rise to credit risk on amounts due from counterparties.counterparty financial institutions (stemming from their insolvency or a downgrade in their credit ratings). Credit risk is managed by limiting the aggregate amount and duration of exposure to any one counterparty primarily depending on its credit rating and by regular review of these ratings. Acceptable credit ratings are high investment-grade ratings - generally counterparties have ratings of A2/A or higher from Moody’s/Standard & Poor’s ratings agencies. The maximum exposure arising in the event of default on the part of the counterparty (including insolvency) is the carrying value of the relevant financial instrument.

In its worldwide insurance programme, the Group carries appropriate levels of insurance for typical business risks (including product liability) with various leading insurance companies. However, in the event of the failure of one or more of its insurance counterparties, the Group could be impacted by losses where recovery from such counterparties is not possible.

Credit risk arising in the context of the Group’s operations is not significant with the total bad debt provision at the balance sheet date amounting to 6.7%4.6% of gross trade receivables (2010: 7.4%(2013: 5.5%). Customer credit risk is managed at appropriate Group locations according to established policies, procedures and controls. Customer credit quality is assessed in line with strict credit rating criteria and credit limits established where appropriate. Outstanding customer balances are regularly monitored and a review for indicators of impairment (evidence of financial difficulty of the customer, payment default, breach of contract etc.) is carried out at each reporting date. Significant balances are reviewed individually while smaller balances are grouped and assessed collectively. Receivables balances are in general unsecured and non-interest-bearing. The trade receivables balances disclosed in note 1817 comprise a large number of customers spread across the Group’s activities and geographies with balances classified as neither past due nor impaired representing 75%72% of the total trade receivables balance at the balance sheet date (2010: 75%(2013: 72%); amounts receivable from related parties (notes 1817 and 32)31) are immaterial. Factoring and credit guarantee arrangements are employed in certain of the Group’s operations where deemed to be of benefit by operational management.

Liquidity risk

The principal liquidity risks faced by the Group stem from the maturation of debt obligations and derivative transactions. A downgrade of CRH’s credit ratings may give rise to increases in funding costs in respect of future debt and may impair the Group’s ability to raise funds on acceptable terms. The Group’s corporate treasury function ensures that sufficient resources are available to meet such liabilities as they fall due through a combination of liquid investments, cash and cash equivalents, cash flows and undrawn committed bank facilities. Flexibility in funding sources is achieved through a variety of means including (i) maintaining cash and cash equivalents and liquid resources only with a diversity of highly-rated counterparties; (ii) limiting the maturity of such balances; (iii) borrowing the bulk of the Group’s debt requirements under committed bank lines or other term financing; and (iv) having surplus committed lines of credit.

The undrawn committed facilities available to the Group as at the balance sheet date are quantified in note 23; these facilities span a wide number of highly-rated financial institutions thus minimising any potential exposure arising from concentrations in borrowing sources. The repayment schedule (analysed by maturity date) applicable to the Group’s outstanding interest-bearing loans and borrowings as at the balance sheet date is also presented in note 23.

 

CRH    143LOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      169

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

21. Capital and Financial Risk Management|continued

Commodity price risk

The Group’s exposure to commodity price risk is minimal with the fair value of derivatives used to hedge future energy costs being3 million unfavourable as at the balance sheet date (2010:4 million favourable).

The tables below show the projected contractual undiscounted total cash outflows (principal and interest) arising from the Group’s trade and other payables, gross debt and derivative financial instruments. The tables also include the gross cash inflows projected to arise from derivative financial instruments. These projections are based on the interest and foreign exchange rates applying at the end of the relevant financial year.

 

 Within
1 year
m
 Between
1 and 2
years
m
 Between
2 and 3
years
m
 Between
3 and 4
years
m
 Between
4 and 5
years
m
 After
5 years
m
 Total
m
   Within
1 year
€m
 Between
1 and 2
years
€m
 Between
2 and 3
years
€m
 Between
3 and 4
years
€m
 Between
4 and 5
years
€m
 After
5 years
€m
 Total
€m
 

At 31 December 2011

       
At 31 December 2014        

Financial liabilities - cash outflows

               

Trade and other payables

  2,858    117    23    24    25    38    3,085     2,894    178    25    16    11    56    3,180  

Finance leases

  3    3    3    2    1    13    25     2    2    2    1    2    4    13  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

  511    564    920    355    1,290    1,070    4,710  

Interest payments on finance leases

  1    1    1    1    1    5    10  
Interest payments on interest-bearing loans and borrowings  286    268    208    158    120    327    1,367  

Interest rate swaps - net cash outflows

  1    -    -    -    -    1    2  

Cross-currency swaps - gross cash outflows

  1,207    428    24    327    -    -    1,986  
Other derivative financial instruments  2    1    1    -    -    2    6  

Gross projected cash outflows

  4,869    1,382    1,180    867    1,437    1,456    11,191  

Derivative financial instruments - cash inflows

       

Interest rate swaps - net cash inflows

  (70  (53  (32  (24  (18  (15  (212

Cross-currency swaps - gross cash inflows

  (1,197  (471  (24  (307  -    -    (1,999
Other derivative financial instruments  (1  -    -    -    -    -    (1

Gross projected cash inflows

  (1,268  (524  (56  (331  (18  (15  (2,212

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

     

At 31 December 2010

       

Financial liabilities - cash outflows

       

Trade and other payables

  2,686    89    17    18    19    38    2,867  

Finance leases

  2    2    1    2    1    4    12  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

  655    368    575    908    336    2,251    5,093  

Interest payments on finance leases

  1    1    -    -    -    2    4  
Interest payments on interest-bearing loans and borrowings  311    274    258    199    151    431    1,624  

Interest rate swaps - net cash outflows

  1    -    1    -    -    1    3  
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings   452    1,371    1    536    500    2,882    5,742  
Interest payments on other interest-bearing loans and borrowings   253    207    157    137    90    305    1,149  

Cross-currency swaps - gross cash outflows

  1,312    42    427    24    327    -    2,132     1,729    -    -    -    -    -    1,729  

Gross projected cash outflows

  4,968    776    1,279    1,151    834    2,727    11,735     5,330    1,758    185    690    603    3,247    11,813  

Derivative financial instruments - cash inflows

               

Interest rate swaps - net cash inflows

  (113  (69  (53  (31  (22  (30  (318   (34  (28  (19  (14  (6  (18  (119

Cross-currency swaps - gross cash inflows

  (1,244  (27  (455  (24  (298  -    (2,048   (1,738  -    -    -    -    -    (1,738

Other derivative financial instruments

  (3  (1  (1  -    -    -    (5

Gross projected cash inflows

  (1,360  (97  (509  (55  (320  (30  (2,371   (1,772  (28  (19  (14  (6  (18  (1,857
The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:     
At 31 December 2013        
Financial liabilities - cash outflows        
Trade and other payables   2,754    140    20    22    22    128    3,086  
Finance leases   3    2    1    6    1    2    15  
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings   955    353    1,203    -    472    2,445    5,428  
Interest payments on finance leases   1    1    -    -    -    -    2  
Interest payments on other interest-bearing loans and borrowings   263    214    178    134    116    318    1,223  
Cross-currency swaps - gross cash outflows   2,196    327    -    -    -    -    2,523  
Gross projected cash outflows   6,172    1,037    1,402    162    611    2,893    12,277  
Derivative financial instruments - cash inflows        
Interest rate swaps - net cash inflows   (40  (30  (20  (12  (13  (22  (137
Cross-currency swaps - gross cash inflows   (2,183  (308  -    -    -    -    (2,491
Gross projected cash inflows   (2,223  (338  (20  (12  (13  (22  (2,628

Commodity price risk

144    CRH


The fair value of derivatives used to hedge future energy costs was19 million unfavourable as at the balance sheet date (2013:Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4 million unfavourable).

 

 

22. Liquid Investments and Cash and Cash Equivalents

Liquid investments and cashCash and cash equivalents balances are spread across a wide number of highly-rated financial institutions with no material concentrations in credit or liquidity risk.

Liquid investments

Liquid investments comprise short-term deposits and current asset investments which are held as readily disposable stores of value and include investments in government gilts and commercial paper and deposits of less than one year in duration.institutions. The credit risk attaching to these items is documented in note 21.

    

2011

m

   

2010

m

 

Liquid investments held-for-trading (fair value through profit or loss)

   28     32  

Loans and receivables

   1     5  

Total

   29     37  

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances held for the purposes of meeting short-term cash commitments and investments which are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.

Cash and cash equivalents are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at fair value and are analysed as follows:

 

  2014   2013 
  €m   m 

Cash at bank and in hand

   429     658     689     582  

Investments (short-term deposits)

   866     1,072     2,573     1,958  

Total

   1,295     1,730     3,262     2,540  

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily deposit bank rates. Short-term deposits, which include bank and money market deposits, are made for varying periods of between one day and three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.

CRH    145


Cash and cash equivalents at fair value include the following for the purposes of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Statement of Cash Flows:

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cash at bank and in hand

   689     582  

Investments (short-term deposits)

   2,573     1,958  

Cash at bank and in hand reclassified as held for sale

   33     -  

Total

   3,295     2,540  

 

170      CRH


23. Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings

Loans and borrowings outstanding

Loans and borrowings outstanding 2011  2010 
   

Including share of
joint ventures

m

  

Excluding share of
joint ventures

m

  

Including share of
joint ventures

m

  

Excluding share of
joint ventures

m

 

Bank overdrafts

  64    49    42    33  

Bank loans

  155    40    254    157  

Leases

  25    23    12    11  

Bonds and private placements

  4,620    4,614    4,971    4,965  

Other

  118    32    82    6  
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings*  4,982    4,758    5,361    5,172  

    2014
€m
     2013
m
 

Bank overdrafts

   70       40  

Bank loans

   16       28  

Finance leases

   13       15  

Bonds and private placements

   5,750       5,439  

Other

   17       18  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings*

   5,866       5,540  

 

*

Including loans of9 €1 million (2010:16(2013: €1 million) secured on specific items of property, plant and equipment; these figures do not include finance leases.

Maturity profile of loans and borrowings and undrawn committed facilities

 

  Including share of joint ventures   Excluding share of joint ventures   As at 31 December 2014       As at 31 December 2013 
  Loans and
borrowings
m
   

Undrawn
committed
facilities**

m

   

Loans and
borrowings

m

   

Undrawn
committed
facilities**

m

   

Loans and

borrowings

€m

   

Undrawn

        committed

facilities**

€m

       

Loans and

borrowings

m

   

Undrawn

        committed

facilities**

m

 

At 31 December 2011

  

Within one year

   519     135     459     132     447     22           961     -  

Between one and two years

   604     237     580     184     1,395     -       349     40  

Between two and three years

   957     1     941     1     -     -       1,240     1,625  

Between three and four years

   356     37     341     -     562     -       4     85  

Between four and five years

   1,357     1,500     1,345     1,500     505     2,641       506     200  

After five years

   1,189     28     1,092     1     2,957     -       2,480     -  

Total

   4,982     1,938     4,758     1,818     5,866     2,663       5,540     1,950  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

At 31 December 2010

        

Within one year

   666     366     621     357  

Between one and two years

   393     781     382     781  

Between two and three years

   626     157     590     119  

Between three and four years

   945     2     939     -  

Between four and five years

   337     38     331     -  

After five years

   2,394     36     2,309     2  

Total

   5,361     1,380     5,172     1,259  

 

**

The Group manages its borrowing ability by entering into committed borrowing agreements. Revolving committed bank facilities are generally available to the Group for periods of up to five years from the date of inception. The figures shown above are the undrawn committed facilities available to be drawn by the Group at 31 December 2011.2014.

In January 2012, CRH Finance BV (a wholly-owned subsidiary) completed an issue of500 million 7-year corporate bonds at a coupon rate of 5%, which are unconditionally guaranteed by CRH plc.Guarantees

146    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

23. Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowingscontinued

Guarantees

The Company has given letters of guarantee to secure obligations of subsidiary undertakings as follows:4.75.8 billion in respect of loans, bank advances, derivative obligations and future lease obligations (2010:(2013:5.25.5 billion),427288 million in respect of letters of credit (2010:(2013:435270 million) and95 million in respect of other obligations (2010:(2013:8nil million).

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 17, Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986, the Company has guaranteed the liabilities of its wholly-owned subsidiary undertakings and the Oldcastle Finance Company and Oldcastle North America Funding Company general partnerships in the Republic of Ireland for the financial year ended 31 December 20112014 and, as a result, such subsidiary undertakings and the general partnerships have been exempted from the filing provisions of Section 7, Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986 and Regulation 20 of the European Communities (Accounts Regulations),(Accounts) Regulations, 1993 respectively.

Lender covenants

The Group’s major bank facilities and debt issued pursuant to Note Purchase Agreements in private placements require the Group to maintain certain financial covenants. Non-compliance with financial covenants would give the relevant lenders the right to terminate facilities and demand early repayment of any sums drawn thereunder thus altering the maturity profile of the Group’s debt and the Group’s liquidity. Calculations for financial covenants are completed for twelve-month periods half-yearly on 30 June and 31 December. CRHThe Group was in full compliance with its financial covenants throughout each of the periods presented. The Group is not aware of any stated events of default as defined in the Agreements.

The financial covenants are:

 

(1)

Minimum interestcover (excluding share of joint ventures) defined as PBITDA/net interest (all as defined in the relevant agreement) cover at no lower than 4.5 times. As at 31 December 20112014 the ratio was 7.47.0 times (2010: 7.3(2013: 6.3 times; 2009: 6.12012: 6.5 times);

 

(2)

Minimum networth defined as total equity plus deferred tax liabilities and capital grants less repayable capital grants being in aggregate no lower than55.0 billion (2013:5.1 billion) (such minimum being adjusted for foreign exchange translation impacts). As at 31 December 2011 minimum2014 net worth (as defined)defined in the relevant agreement) was12.111.5 billion (2010:(2013:12.110.9 billion).

 

CRH    147LOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      171

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

24. Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair values of derivative financial instruments are analysed by year of maturity and by accounting designation as follows:

 

  Fair value
hedges
  Cash flow
hedges
  Net
investment
hedges
  Not
designated
as hedges
  Total  Total
excluding
share of joint
ventures
 
   m  m  m  m  m  m 

At 31 December 2011

      

Derivative assets

                        

Within one year - current assets

  6    1    12    5    24    23  

Between one and two years

  62    -    -    -    62    62  

Between two and three years

  32    -    -    -    32    32  

Between three and four years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

Between four and five years

  46    -    -    -    46    46  

After five years

  41    -    -    -    41    41  

Non-current assets

  181    -    -    -    181    181  

Total derivative assets

  187    1    12    5    205    204  

Derivative liabilities

                        

Within one year - current liabilities

  -    (2  (8  -    (10  (10

Between one and two years

  -    (1  -    -    (1  (1

Between two and three years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

Between three and four years

  -    (17  -    -    (17  (17

Between four and five years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

After five years

  -    (2  -    -    (2  -  

Non-current liabilities

  -    (20  -    -    (20  (18

Total derivative liabilities

  -    (22  (8  -    (30  (28

Net asset arising on derivative financial instruments

  187    (21  4    5    175    176  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

    

At 31 December 2010

      

Derivative assets

                        

Within one year - current assets

  10    3    1    -    14    13  

Between one and two years

  22    1    -    29    52    52  

Between two and three years

  49    1    -    -    50    50  

Between three and four years

  34    -    -    -    34    34  

Between four and five years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

After five years

  58    -    -    -    58    58  

Non-current assets

  163    2    -    29    194    194  

Total derivative assets

  173    5    1    29    208    207  

Derivative liabilities

                        

Within one year - current liabilities

  -    -    (53  (1  (54  (54

Between one and two years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

Between two and three years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

Between three and four years

  -    -    -    -    -    -  

Between four and five years

  -    (28  -    -    (28  (28

After five years

  (4  -    -    (1  (5  (4

Non-current liabilities

  (4  (28  -    (1  (33  (32

Total derivative liabilities

  (4  (28  (53  (2  (87  (86
       

Net asset arising on derivative financial instruments

  169    (23  (52  27    121    121  

148    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

    Fair
value
hedges
€m
  Cash flow
hedges
€m
  

Net
investment
hedges

€m

  Not
designated
as hedges
€m
  Total
€m
 

At 31 December 2014

      

Derivative assets

                     

Within one year - current assets

   -    2    13    -    15  

Between one and two years

   22    -    -    -    22  

Between three and four years

   26    -    -    -    26  

Between four and five years

   -    -    -    9    9  

After five years

   30    -    -    -    30  

Non-current assets

   78    -    -    9    87  

Total derivative assets

   78    2    13    9    102  

Derivative liabilities

                     

Within one year - current liabilities

   -    (7  (4  (9  (20

Between one and two years

   -    (1  -    -    (1

Between two and three years

   -    (1  -    -    (1

Between three and four years

   -    (1  -    -    (1

Non-current liabilities

   -    (3  -    -    (3

Total derivative liabilities

   -    (10  (4  (9  (23
Net asset arising on derivative financial instruments   78    (8  9    -    79  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

  

At 31 December 2013

      

Derivative assets

                     

Within one year - current assets

   9    -    8    -    17  

Between two and three years

   30    -    -    -    30  

Between four and five years

   28    -    -    -    28  

After five years

   -    -    -    5    5  

Non-current assets

   58    -    -    5    63  

Total derivative assets

   67    -    8    5    80  

Derivative liabilities

                     

Within one year - current liabilities

   -    (2  (17  -    (19

Between one and two years

   -    (21  -    -    (21

Between two and three years

   -    (1  -    -    (1

Between three and four years

   -    (1  -    -    (1

After five years

   (11  -    -    -    (11

Non-current liabilities

   (11  (23  -    -    (34

Total derivative liabilities

   (11  (25  (17  -    (53
Net asset arising on derivative financial instruments   56    (25  (9  5    27  

 

172      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


24. Derivative Financial Instruments|continued

At 31 December 2014 and 2013, the Group had no master netting or similar arrangements, collateral posting requirements, and enforceable right of set-off agreements with any of its derivative counterparts.

Fair value hedges consist of interest rate swaps and currency swaps. These instruments hedge risks arising from changes in asset/liability fair values due to interest rate and foreign exchange rate movements.

Cash flow hedges consist of forward foreign exchange and commodity contracts and interest rate and currency swaps. These instruments hedge risks arising to future cash flows from movements in foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates. Cash flow hedges are expected to affect profit and loss over the period to maturity.

Net investment hedges comprise cross-currency swaps and hedge changes in the value of net investments due to currency movements.

The profit/(loss) arising on fair value, cash flow, net investment hedges and related hedged items reflected in the Consolidated Income Statement is shown below:

 

  2011
m
 2010
m
 2009
m
   2014
€m
   

2013

m

   

2012

m

 

Cash flow hedges - ineffectiveness

   2    8    (6   -     -     (3

Fair value of hedge instruments

   12    (3  (108   15     (68   (16

Fair value of the hedged items

   (17  6    105     (16   71     21  

Net investment hedges - ineffectiveness

   -    1    -  
  2011 2010 2009 
  m m m 

Components of other comprehensive income - cash flow hedges

          

(Losses)/gains arising during the year:

    

Commodity forward contracts

   (4  7    1  

Interest rate swaps

   (1  -    -  

Losses arising during the year:

      

- commodity forward contracts

   (6   (2   -  

Reclassification adjustments for (gains)/losses included in:

    

Reclassification adjustments for losses included in:

      

- the Consolidated Income Statement

   (2  3    16     -     -     1  

- property, plant and equipment

   -    -    (2

Total

   (7  10    15     (6   (2   1  
Fair value hierarchy      2014   2013 
       Level 2
€m
   Level 2
m
 

Assets measured at fair value

      

Fair value hedges - cross currency and interest rate swaps

     78     67  

Net investment hedges - cross currency swaps

     13     8  

Not designated as hedges (held-for-trading) - interest rate swaps

     9     5  

Cash flow hedges - cross currency, interest rate swaps and commodity forwards

      2     -  

Total

      102     80  

Liabilities measured at fair value

      

Fair value hedges - cross currency and interest rate swaps

     -     (11

Cash flow hedges - cross currency, interest rate swaps and commodity forwards

     (10   (25

Net investment hedges - cross currency swaps

     (4   (17

Not designated as hedges (held-for-trading) - interest rate swaps

      (9   -  

Total

      (23   (53

CRH    149


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

25. Analysis of Net Debt

Components of net debt

Net debt is a non-GAAP measure which we provide to investors as we believe they find it useful. Net debt comprises cash and cash equivalents, liquid investments, derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities and interest-bearing loans and borrowings and enables investors to see the economic effects of these in total (see note 21 for details of the capital and risk management policy employed by the Group). Net debt is commonly used in computations such as net debt as a % of total equity and net debt as a % of market capitalisation.

  As at 31 December 2011  

 

 As at 31 December 2010 
   

Fair value (i)
including
share

of joint
ventures
m

  

Book value
including
share

of joint
ventures
m

  

Book value
excluding
share

of joint
ventures
m

     

Fair value (i)
including
share

of joint
ventures
m

  

Book value
including
share

of joint
ventures
m

  

Book value
excluding
share

of joint
ventures
m

 

Cash and cash equivalents (note 22)

  1,295    1,295    1,246     1,730    1,730    1,670  

Liquid investments (note 22)

  29    29    1     37    37    1  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (note 23)

  (5,051  (4,982  (4,758   (5,464  (5,361  (5,172

Derivative financial instruments (net) (note 24)

  175    175    176      121    121    121  

Group net debt

  (3,552  (3,483  (3,335    (3,576  (3,473  (3,380

(i)The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and floating rate loans and borrowings are based on their carrying amounts, which constitute a reasonable approximation of fair value. The carrying value of liquid investments is the market value of these investments with these values quoted on liquid markets. The carrying value of derivatives is fair value based on discounted future cash flows at current foreign exchange and interest rates. The fair value of fixed rate debt is calculated based on actual traded prices for publicly traded debt or discounted future cash flows reflecting market interest rate changes since issuance for other fixed rate debt.

Reconciliation of opening to closing net debt

    2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 
At 1 January   (3,473  (3,723  (6,091
Decrease in liquid investments   (4  (33  (65
Debt in acquired companies   (47  (37  (3
Debt in disposed companies   50    -    -  
Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   (101  (566  (757
Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments   63    (82  (16
Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   552    885    2,501  
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents   (446  286    593  
Mark-to-market adjustment   (18  18    (5
Translation adjustment   (59  (221  120  
At 31 December   (3,483  (3,473  (3,723

150    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

25. Analysis of Net Debtcontinued

The following table shows the effective interest rates on period-end fixed, gross and net debt:

  As at 31 December 2011  As at 31 December 2010 
   m  Interest
rate
  Weighted
average
fixed
period
(Years)
  m  Interest
rate
  Weighted
average
fixed
period
(Years)
 
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings nominal - fixed rate (ii)  (4,446    (4,777  

Derivative financial instruments - fixed rate

  2,010            2,185          

Net fixed rate debt including derivatives

  (2,436  6.3%    6.3    (2,592  6.3%    6.7  
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings nominal - floating rate (iii)  (289    (328  

Adjustment of debt from nominal to book value (ii)

  (247    (256  

Derivative financial instruments - currency floating rate

  (1,835          (2,064        

Gross debt including derivative financial instruments

  (4,807  4.7%     (5,240  4.5%   

Cash and cash equivalents - floating rate

  1,295      1,730    

Liquid investments - floating rate

  29            37          

Net debt including derivative financial instruments

  (3,483          (3,473        

(ii)Of the Group’s nominal fixed rate debt at 31 December 2011,2,309 million (2010:2,505 million) was hedged to floating rate at inception using interest rate swaps. In accordance with IAS 39Financial Instruments:Recognition and Measurement, hedged fixed rate debt is recorded at amortised cost adjusted for the change in value arising from changes in underlying market interest rates and the related hedging instruments (interest rate swaps) are stated at fair value. Adjustments to fixed rate debt values and the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument are reflected in the Consolidated Income Statement. The balance of nominal fixed rate debt of2,137 million (2010:2,272 million) pertains to financial liabilities measured at amortised cost in accordance with IAS 39.

(iii)Floating rate debt comprises bank borrowings and finance leases bearing interest at rates set in advance for periods ranging from overnight to less than one year largely by reference to inter-bank interest rates (US$ LIBOR, Sterling LIBOR, Swiss Franc LIBOR and Euribor).

Fair value hierarchy

The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels have been defined as follows:

Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)
Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)

   As at 31 December 2011  As at 31 December 2010 
    Level  1
m
   Level  2
m
  Total
m
  Level 1
m
   Level 2
m
  Total
m
 

Assets measured at fair value

         

Fair value hedges - cross currency and interest rate swaps

   -     187    187    -     173    173  

Cash flow hedges

   -     1    1    -     5    5  

Net investment hedges - cross currency swaps

   -     12    12    -     1    1  

Not designated as hedges (held-for-trading) - interest rate swaps

   -     5    5    -     29    29  

Held-for-trading (fair value through profit or loss)

   28     -    28    32     -    32  

Total

   28     205    233    32     208    240  

Liabilities measured at fair value

         

Fair value hedges - cross currency and interest rate swaps

   -     -    -    -     (4  (4

Cash flow hedges - cross currency and interest rate swaps

   -     (22  (22  -     (28  (28

Net investment hedges - cross currency swaps

   -     (8  (8  -     (53  (53

Not designated as hedges (held-for-trading) - interest rate swaps

   -     -    -    -     (2  (2

Total

   -     (30  (30  -     (87  (87

CRH    151


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

25. Analysis of Net Debtcontinued

During the reporting periods endingAt 31 December 20112014 and 31 December 20102013 there were no transfers betweenderivatives valued using Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and no transfers into and out ofor Level 3 fair value measurements.

Currency profile

The currency profiletechniques. Valuation methods for Levels 1, 2 and 3 are described in the “fair value hierarchy” section of the Group’s net debt and net worth (capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders) as at 31 December 2011 is as follows:accounting policies on page 145.

 

    euro
m
  US
Dollar
m
  Pound
Sterling
m
  Swiss
Franc
m
  Other (iv)
m
  Total
m
 
Net debt by major currency including derivative financial instruments   (1,002  (2,200  (29  (134  (118  (3,483

Non-debt assets and liabilities analysed as follows:

       

Non-current assets

   4,313    6,751    497    891    2,449    14,901  

Current assets

   1,629    2,145    219    366    598    4,957  

Non-current liabilities

   (774  (1,238  (188  (233  (179  (2,612

Current liabilities

   (1,171  (1,199  (201  (243  (366  (3,180

Non-controlling interests

   (24  (7  -    (10  (33  (74
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders (v)   2,971    4,252    298    637    2,351    10,509  
The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:       
Net debt by major currency including derivative financial instruments   (1,151  (1,941  (2  (224  (155  (3,473
Non-debt assets and liabilities analysed as follows:       

Non-current assets

   4,592    6,520    498    875    2,283    14,768  

Current assets

   1,619    1,955    225    373    546    4,718  

Non-current liabilities

   (716  (1,337  (191  (157  (182  (2,583

Current liabilities

   (1,174  (1,100  (225  (244  (276  (3,019

Non-controlling interests

   (31  (7  -    (10  (35  (83
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders (v)   3,139    4,090    305    613    2,181    10,328  

LOGO

 

(iv)The principal currencies included in this category are the Polish Zloty, the Indian Rupee, the Ukranian Hryvnya, the Chinese Renminbi, the Turkish Lira, the Canadian Dollar, the Israeli Shekel and the Argentine Peso.
CRH      173


LOGO

(v)Gains and losses arising on the retranslation of net worth are dealt with in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Transactional currency exposures arise in a number of the Group’s operations and these result in net currency gains and losses which are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement and are immaterial (with materiality defined in the context of the year-end 2011 financial statements).

152    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

26.25. Provisions for Liabilities

 

Net present cost 

At
1 January

m

  

Translation
adjustment

m

  

Arising on
acquisition

m

  

Provided
during
year

m

  

Utilised
during
year

m

  

Disposed
during
year

m

  

Reversed
unused

m

  

Discount
unwinding
(note 9)

m

  

At
31 December

m

  At 1
January
€m
 Translation
adjustment
€m
 Arising on
acquisition
(note 30)
€m
 

Provided
during
year

€m

 Utilised
during
year
€m
 

Reclassified
as held
for sale

€m

 Reversed
unused
€m
 Discount
unwinding
€m
 At 31
December
€m
 
 

31 December 2011

         
31 December 2014         

Insurance (i)

  207    5    -    51    (47  -    (26  9    199    181    20    -    52    (50  -    (3  8    208  

Environment and remediation (ii)

  81    2    1    8    (4  -    (2  2    88    87    5    -    12    (4  (4  (4  4    96  

Rationalisation and redundancy (iii)

  28    -    1    26    (40  (2  (1  1    13    43    1    -    30    (48  -    (3  1    24  

Other (iv)

  71    -    13    15    (15  (6  (8  3    73    69    1    1    14    (8  (3  (9  3    68  

Total

  387    7    15    100    (106  (8  (37  15    373    380    27    1    108    (110  (7  (19  16    396  

Analysed as:

                  

Non-current liabilities

  253           252    231           257  

Current liabilities

  134           121    149           139  

Total

  387           373    380           396  
The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:  

The equivalent disclosure for the prior year is as follows:

  

 

31 December 2010

Insurance (i)

  201    12    -    37    (50  -    (2  9    207  
31 December 2013         
Insurance (i)  191    (7  -    42    (50  -    (4  9    181  

Environment and remediation (ii)

  65    7    6    6    (2  (1  (2  2    81    82    (1  5    6    (4  -    (4  3    87  

Rationalisation and redundancy (iii)

  25    -    -    55    (52  -    (1  1    28    26    -    5    55    (38  -    (6  1    43  

Other (iv)

  69    1    1    23    (19  -    (7  3    71    67    (1  4    14    (11  -    (6  2    69  

Total

  360    20    7    121    (123  (1  (12  15    387    366    (9  14    117    (103  -    (20  15    380  

Analysed as:

                  

Non-current liabilities

  240           253    256           231  

Current liabilities

  120           134    110           149  

Total

  360           387    366           380  

 

(i)

This provision relates to actual and potential obligations arising under the self-insurance components of the Group’s insurance arrangements which comprise employers’ liability (workers’ compensation in the United States), public and products liability (general liability in the United States), automobile liability, property damage, business interruption and various other insurances; a substantial proportion of the total provision pertains to claims which are classified as “incurred but not reported”. Due to the extended timeframe associated with many of the insurances, a significant proportion of the total provision is subject to periodic actuarial valuation. The projected cash flows underlying the discounting process are established through the application of actuarial triangulations, which are extrapolated from historical claims experience. The triangulations applied in the discounting process indicate that the Group’s insurance provisions have an average life of fivesix years (2010: five(2013: six years).

 

(ii)

This provision comprises obligations governing site remediation and improvement costs to be incurred in compliance with either local or national environmental regulations together with constructive obligations stemming from established best practice. Whilst a significant element of the total provision will reverse in the medium-term (two to ten years), the majority of the legal and constructive obligations applicable to long-lived assets (principally mineral-bearing land) will unwind over a 30-year timeframe. In discounting the related obligations, expected future cash outflows have been determined with due regard to extraction status and anticipated remaining life.

 

(iii)

These provisions relate to irrevocable commitments under various rationalisation and redundancy programmes, none of which is individually material to the Group. In 2011,2014,2630 million (2010:(2013:55 million; 2009:2012:11448 million) was provided in respect of rationalisation and redundancy activities as a consequence of undertaking various cost reduction initiatives across all operations. These initiatives included removing excess capacity from manufacturing and distribution networks and scaling operations to match market supply and demand; implementation of these initiatives resulted in a reduction in staffing levels in all business segments over recent years. The Group expects that these provisions will be utilised within one to two years of the balance sheet date (2010: three(2013: one to two years).

 

(iv)

This includes provisions relating to guarantees and warranties of13 million (2010:(2013:2014 million) throughout the Group at 31 December 2011.2014. The Group expects that these provisions will be utilised within two years of the balance sheet date (2010: three(2013: two years).

Discount rate sensitivity analysis

All non-current provisions are discounted at a rate of 5% (2010:(2013: 5%; 2009:2012: 5%), consistent with the average effective interest rate for the Group’s borrowings. TheThere isnil million impact (2013:nil million; 2012:1 million) on profit before tax of a 1% change in the discount rate applicable to provisions, with all other variables held constant, isnil million (2010:1 million; 2009:1 million).constant.

 

CRH    153

174      CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

27.26. Deferred Income Tax

The deductible and taxable temporary differences in respect of which deferred tax has been recognised are as follows:

 

  2014
€m
     2013
m
 
  2011
m
 2010
m
 

Reported in balance sheet after offset

         

Deferred tax liabilities

   1,492    1,693     1,305       1,166  

Deferred tax assets

   (290  (385   (171     (107

Net deferred income tax liability

   1,202    1,308     1,134       1,059  

Deferred income tax assets (deductible temporary differences)

         

Deficits on Group defined benefit pension obligations (note 28)

   140    108  

Deficits on Group retirement benefit obligations (note 27)

   140       74  

Revaluation of derivative financial instruments to fair value

   12    16     14       15  

Tax loss carryforwards

   131    34     97       98  

Share-based payment expense

   2    2     2       2  

Provisions for liabilities and working capital-related items

   209    184     187       144  

Other deductible temporary differences

   35    41     37       38  

Total

   529    385     477       371  

Deferred income tax assets have been recognised in respect of all deductible temporary differences, with the exception of some tax loss carryfowards.carryforwards. The amount of tax losses whosewhere recovery is not probable and is therefore not recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is376937 million (2010:(2013:235712 million), the. The vast majority will expire post 2016 (2010: 2015)2019 (2013: 2018).

 

Deferred income tax liabilities (taxable temporary differences)

          
Taxable temporary differences principally attributable to accelerated tax depreciation and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition (i)   1,697     1,656     1,575       1,400  
Revaluation of derivative financial instruments to fair value   14     13     18       13  

Rolled-over capital gains

   20     24     18       17  

Total

   1,731     1,693     1,611       1,430  

(i) Fair value adjustments arising on acquisition principally relate to property, plant and equipment.

      

Movement in net deferred income tax liability

      

At 1 January

   1,059       1,041  

Translation adjustment

   125       (37

Net expense for the year (note 10)

   36       4  

Arising on acquisition (note 30)

   2       8  

Reclassified as held for sale

   (19     -  

Movement in deferred tax asset on Group retirement benefit obligations

   (69     43  

At 31 December

   1,134       1,059  

LOGO

 

(i)Fair value adjustments arising on acquisition principally relate to property, plant and equipment.
CRH      175


LOGO

Movement in net deferred income tax liability   
At 1 January   1,308    1,182  
Translation adjustment   14    83  
Net (credit)/charge for the year (note 11)   (80  27  
Arising on acquisition (note 31)   27    28  
Disposal (note 5)   (9  (11
Movement in deferred tax asset on Group defined benefit pension obligations   (56  (7
Movement in deferred tax asset on share-based payment expense   -    3  

Movement in deferred tax liability on cash flow hedges

   (2  3  

At 31 December

   1,202    1,308  

154    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28.27. Retirement Benefit Obligations

The Group operates either defined benefit or defined contribution pension schemes in all of its principal operating areas. Scheme assets areThe disclosures included below relate to all pension schemes in the Group, including any schemes reclassified as held in separate trustee-administered funds.for sale.

The Group operates defined benefit pension schemes in the Republic of Ireland, Britain and Northern Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Portugal, Switzerland and the United States; for the purposes of the disclosures which follow, the schemes in the Republic of Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium Germany and Portugal (49% joint venture)Germany have been aggregated into a “Eurozone” category on the basis of common currency and financial assumptions. In line with the principle of proportionate consolidation, the assets, liabilities, income and expenses attaching to defined benefit pension schemes in joint ventures are reflected in the figures below on the basis of the Group’s share of these entities. The majority of the defined benefit pension schemes operated by the Group are funded as disclosed in the analysis of the defined benefit obligation presented below with unfunded schemes restricted to one scheme in each of the Netherlands Portugal and the United States and three schemes in Germany.

All funded defined benefit schemes are administered by separate funds that are legally separate from the Group under the jurisdiction of Trustees. Each of the Group’s schemes operate under broadly similar regulatory frameworks. The Trustees of the various pension funds in existence across the Group are required by law and by their Articles of Association to act in the best interests of the scheme participants and are responsible for the definition of investment strategy and for scheme administration. The level of benefits available to members depends on length of service and either their average salary over their period of employment or their salary in the final years leading up to retirement. The Group’s pension schemes in Switzerland are contribution-based schemes with guarantees to provide further contributions in the event that certain targets are not met largely in relation to investment return and the annuity conversion factor on retirement.

Provision has been made in the financial statements for post-retirement healthcare obligations in respect of certain current and former employees principally in the United States and in Portugal and for long-term service commitments in respect of certain employees in the Eurozone and Switzerland. These obligations are unfunded in nature and the required disclosures are set out below.form part of this note.

The cumulative actuarial gains and losses attributable to the Group'sDefined benefit pension schemes - principal risks

Through its defined benefit pension schemes and post-retirement healthcare plans, the Group is exposed to a number of risks, the most significant of which are detailed below:

Asset volatility: Under IFRS, the assets of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes are reported at fair value (using bid prices, where relevant). The majority of the schemes’ assets comprise of equities, bonds and property all of which may fluctuate significantly in value from period to period. Given that liabilities are discounted to present value based on bond yields and that bond prices are inversely related to yields, an increase in the liability discount rate (which would reduce liabilities) would reduce bond values though not necessarily by an equal magnitude.

Given the maturity of certain of the Group’s funded defined benefit pension schemes, de-risking frameworks have been introduced to mitigate deficit volatility and enable better matching of investment returns with the cash outflows related to benefit obligations. These frameworks entail the usage of asset-liability matching techniques whereby triggers are set for the conversion of equity holdings into bonds of similar average duration to the relevant liabilities.

Discount rates: The discount rates employed in determining the present value of the schemes’ liabilities are determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on high-quality corporate bonds of a currency and term consistent with the currency and term of the associated post-employment benefit obligations. Changes in discount rates impact the quantum of liabilities as discussed above.

Inflation risk: Some of the Group’s pension obligations have an inflation linkage; higher inflation will lead to higher liabilities (although in most cases, caps on the level of inflationary increases are in place to protect the scheme obligations at 1 January 2004 (the dateagainst extreme inflation).

Longevity risk: In the majority of transitioncases, the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes provide benefits for life with spousal and dependent child reversionary provisions; increases in life expectancy will therefore give rise to IFRS) were recognisedhigher liabilities.

Financial assumptions - scheme liabilities

The major long-term assumptions used by the Group’s actuaries in fullthe computation of scheme liabilities as at that date31 December 2014 , 31 December 2013 and adjusted against retained income. Actuarial gains and losses and the associated movement31 December 2012 are as follows:

   

Eurozone

   

Britain and

Northern Ireland

   Switzerland   United States 
   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 
    %   %   %   %   %   %   %   %   %   %   %   % 
Rate of increase in:                        
- salaries   3.75     4.00     4.00     4.00     4.30     4.00     2.25     2.25     2.25     3.50     3.50     3.50  
- pensions in payment   1.75     2.00     2.00     3.00-3.20     3.30-3.50     3.00-3.40     -     0.25     0.25     -     -     -  
Inflation   1.75     2.00     2.00     3.00     3.30     3.00     1.25     1.25     1.25     2.00     2.00     2.00  
Discount rate   2.00     3.70     3.80     3.50     4.60     4.50     1.15     2.35     1.85     3.80     4.70     3.75  
Medical cost trend rate   n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     16.70     7.40     6.25  

The mortality assumptions employed in determining the present value of scheme liabilities under IAS 19Employee Benefits are in accordance with the underlying funding valuations and represent actuarial best practice in the relevant jurisdictions taking account of mortality experience and industry circumstances. With regard to the most material of the Group’s schemes, the future life expectations factored into the relevant valuations, based on retirement at 65 years of age for current and future retirees, are as follows:

     
               

Republic of

Ireland

   

Britain and

Northern Ireland

   Switzerland 
                   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 

Current retirees

  

                  

- male

  

   22.8     22.7     22.6     23.2     23.2     23.2     21.3     21.3     19.7  

- female

  

   24.9     24.9     24.4     25.8     25.7     25.8     23.8     23.8     22.0  

Future retirees

  

                  

- male

  

   25.8     25.7     25.7     25.6     25.5     24.8     23.5     23.5     19.7  

- female

  

   26.8     26.7     26.7     28.2     28.2     27.4     25.9     25.9     22.0  

The above data allow for future improvements in life expectancy.

176      CRH


27. Retirement Benefit Obligations|continued

Impact on Consolidated Income Statement

The total retirement benefit expense in the net deferred tax asset areConsolidated Income Statement is as follows:

   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m 

Total defined contribution expense

   152     149     142  

Total defined benefit expense

   63     52     39  

Total expense in Consolidated Income Statement

   215     201     181  

At 31 December 2014,44 million (2013:34 million) was included in other payables in respect of defined contribution pension liabilities.

Analysis of defined benefit expense

   Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2014  2013  2012  2014  2013  2012  2014  2013  2012  2014  2013  2012  2014  2013  2012 
    €m  m  m  €m  m  m  €m  m  m  €m  m  m  €m  m  m 

Charged in arriving at Group profit before finance costs:

  

  
Current service cost   11    11    7    14    13    14    24    27    25    2    -    (2  51    51    44  
Administration expenses   1    1    -    2    1    2    -    1    -    -    -    -    3    3    2  
Past service costs   (5  (6  (33  -    (3  -    -    (15  1    -    -    -    (5  (24  (32
    7    6    (26  16    11    16    24    13    26    2    -    (2  49    30    14  

Included in finance income and finance costs respectively:

  

  
Interest income on scheme assets   (29  (27  (29  (31  (26  (26  (16  (12  (16  (9  (6  (7  (85  (71  (78
Interest cost on scheme liabilities   37    39    44    34    30    31    17    14    17    11    10    11    99    93    103  
Net interest expense   8    12    15    3    4    5    1    2    1    2    4    4    14    22    25  
Net charge to Consolidated Income Statement   15    18    (11  19    15    21    25    15    27    4    4    2    63    52    39  

Past service costs also include curtailment and settlement gains. During 2014, there were no significant curtailment or settlement gains (2013: curtailment gain of15 million). The prior year curtailment gain arose due to the implementation of changes to the terms of a number of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes in Switzerland.

No reimbursement rights have been recognised viaas assets in accordance with IAS 19.

Reconciliation of scheme assets (bid value)

   Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
    €m  m  €m  m  €m  m  €m  m  €m  m 
At 1 January   790    710    662    597    683    661    179    174    2,314    2,142  
Movement in year           
Administration expenses   (1  (1  (2  (1  -    (1  -    -    (3  (3
Interest income on scheme assets   29    27    31    26    16    12    9    6    85    71  
Remeasurement adjustments           
- return on scheme assets excluding interest income   87    30    54    44    34    25    4    9    179    108  
Employer contributions paid   72    70    19    28    17    17    7    9    115    124  
Contributions paid by plan participants   3    3    -    -    10    10    -    -    13    13  
Benefit and settlement payments   (45  (49  (25  (21  (30  (31  (14  (11  (114  (112
Reclassified as held for sale   -    -    (633  -    -    -    -    -    (633  -  
Translation adjustment   -    -    49    (11  15    (10  26    (8  90    (29
At 31 December   935    790    155    662    745    683    211    179    2,046    2,314  

LOGO

CRH      177


LOGO

27. Retirement Benefit Obligations|continued

Reconciliation of actuarial value of liabilities

   Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
    €m  m  €m  m  €m  m  €m  m  €m  m 
At 1 January   (1,045  (1,054  (723  (705  (727  (765  (229  (271  (2,724  (2,795
Movement in year           
Current service cost   (11  (11  (14  (13  (24  (27  (2  -    (51  (51
Past service costs   5    6    -    3    -    15    -    -    5    24  
Interest cost on scheme liabilities   (37  (39  (34  (30  (17  (14  (11  (10  (99  (93
Remeasurement adjustments           
- experience variations   20    23    1    2    7    17    -    -    28    42  
- actuarial (loss)/gain from changes in financial assumptions   (306  (16  (129  (13  (142  64    (27  30    (604  65  
- actuarial loss from changes in demographic assumptions   -    -    -    (2  -    (51  (17  -    (17  (53
Contributions paid by plan participants   (3  (3  -    -    (10  (10  -    -    (13  (13
Benefit and settlement payments   45    49    25    21    30    31    14    11    114    112  
Reclassified as held for sale   -    -    714    -    -    -    -    -    714    -  
Translation adjustment   -    -    (56  14    (17  13    (37  11    (110  38  
At 31 December   (1,332  (1,045  (216  (723  (900  (727  (309  (229  (2,757  (2,724
Recoverable deficit in schemes   (397  (255  (61  (61  (155  (44  (98  (50  (711  (410
Related deferred income tax asset   59    39    12    6    30    9    39    20    140    74  
Net pension liability   (338  (216  (49  (55  (125  (35  (59  (30  (571  (336

During the year, there were no settlement payments (2013:11 million) made in respect of the Group’s schemes.

  
Split of scheme liabilities - funded and unfunded     
Funded defined benefit pension schemes   (1,274  (999  (930  (723  (894  (722  (297  (219  (3,395  (2,663
Unfunded defined benefit pension schemes   (52  (40  -    -    -    -    (8  (7  (60  (47
Total - defined benefit pension schemes   (1,326  (1,039  (930  (723  (894  (722  (305  (226  (3,455  (2,710
Post-retirement healthcare obligations (unfunded)   -    -    -    -    -    -    (4  (3  (4  (3
Long-term service commitments (unfunded)   (6  (6  -    -    (6  (5  -    -    (12  (11
Actuarial value of liabilities (present value)   (1,332  (1,045  (930  (723  (900  (727  (309  (229  (3,471  (2,724
Reclassified as held for sale   -    -    714    -    -    -    -    -    714    -  
Actuarial value of liabilities (present value) excluding schemes reclassified as held for sale   (1,332  (1,045  (216  (723  (900  (727  (309  (229  (2,757  (2,724

Sensitivity analysis

The impact of a movement (as indicated below) in the Consolidated Statementprincipal actuarial assumptions would be as follows:

          

Eurozone
2014

€m

  

Britain and
Northern
Ireland
2014

€m

  

Switzerland
2014

€m

     

United

      States

2014

€m

     

Total

      Group

2014

€m

 

Scheme liabilities at 31 December 2014

     (1,332  (930  (900     (309     (3,471

Revised liabilities        

                

Discount rate

  Decrease by 0.25%     (1,398  (979  (941     (320     (3,638

Inflation rate

  Increase by 0.25%     (1,394  (965  (900     (309     (3,568

Life expectancy

  Increase by 1 year     (1,376  (963  (921     (319     (3,579

The above sensitivity analysis is derived through changing the individual assumption while holding all other assumptions constant.

178      CRH


27. Retirement Benefit Obligations|continued

Split of Comprehensive Income.scheme assets

   Eurozone   Britain and
Northern Ireland
   Switzerland   United States   Total Group 
   2014   2013   2014  2013   2014   2013   2014   2013   2014  2013 
    €m   m   €m  m   €m   m   €m   m   €m  m 

Investments quoted in active markets

                  

Equity instruments:

                  

- Developed markets

   281     262     329    340     260     229     69 ��   92     939    923  

- Emerging markets

   10     12     55    53     -     -     -     -     65    65  

Debt instruments:

                  

- Non Government debt instruments

   279     29     166    139     226     210     59     26     730    404  

- Government debt instruments

   265     390     165    69     65     58     67     51     562    568  

Property

   37     29     41    43     31     68     -     -     109    140  

Cash and cash equivalents

   16     47     2    1     -     2     16     4     34    54  

Investment funds

   24     12     17    9     -     -     -     6     41    27  

Assets held by insurance company

   -     -     -    -     -     5     -     -     -    5  

Unquoted investments

                  

Equity instruments:

                  

- Developed markets

   -     -     -    -     1     -     -     -     1    -  

- Emerging markets

   -     -     6    -     -     -     -     -     6    -  

Debt instruments:

                  

- Non Government debt instruments

   -     -     -    -     2     -     -     -     2    -  

Property

   3     2     -    -     97     68     -     -     100    70  

Cash and cash equivalents

   17     4     7    2     44     31     -     -     68    37  

Investment funds

   -     -     -    6     -     -     -     -     -    6  

Assets held by insurance company

   3     3     -    -     19     12     -     -     22    15  

Total assets

   935     790     788    662     745     683     211     179     2,679    2,314  

Reclassified as held for sale

   -     -     (633  -     -     -     -     -     (633  -  
Total excluding schemes reclassified as held for sale   935     790     155    662     745     683     211     179     2,046    2,314  

Actuarial valuations - funding requirements and future cash flows

In accordance with statutory requirements in Ireland and Britain (minimum funding requirements), additional annual contributions and lump-sum payments are required to certain of the schemes in place in those jurisdictions. The funding requirements in relation to the Group'sGroup’s defined benefit schemes are assessed in accordance with the advice of independent and qualified actuaries and valuations are prepared in this regard either annually, where local requirements mandate that this be done, or at triennial intervals at a maximum in all other cases. In Ireland and Britain, either the attained age or projected unit credit methods are used in the valuations. In the Netherlands and Switzerland, the actuarial valuations reflect the current unit method, while the valuations are performed in accordance with the projected unit credit methodology in Portugal and Germany. In the United States, valuations are performed using a variety of actuarial cost methodologies - current unit, projected unit and aggregate cost. The dates of the actuarial valuations range from April 20082011 to December 2011.

The assumptions which have the most significant effect on the results of the actuarial valuations are those relating to the rate of return on investments and the expected rates of increase in salaries and expected inflation. In the course of preparing the funding valuations, it was assumed that the pre-retirement rate of return on investments would, on average, exceed annual salary increases by 2.5% and the post-retirement rate of return on investments would, on average, exceed annual inflation by 2% per annum.January 2014.

In general, actuarial valuations are not available for public inspection; however, the results of valuations are advised to the members of the various schemes.

Financial assumptions - IAS 19schemes on request.

The financial assumptions employedmaturity profile of the Group’s contracted payments (on a discounted basis) to certain schemes in the valuation of the defined benefit liabilities arising on pension schemes, post-retirement healthcare obligationsEurozone (Ireland) and long-term service commitments applying the projected unit credit methodology areBritain and Northern Ireland is as follows:

   Eurozone   Britain and
Northern Ireland
   Total 
   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 
    €m   m   m   €m   m   m   €m   m   m 

Within one year

   18     18     18     8     7     18     26     25     36  

Between one and two years

   17     17     17     8     7     7     25     24     24  

Between two and three years

   17     16     16     7     7     6     24     23     22  

Between three and four years

   17     16     16     7     6     6     24     22     22  

Between four and five years

   -     15     15     7     6     6     7     21     21  

After five years

   -     -     15     48     47     41     48     47     56  
    69     82     97     85     80     84     154     162     181  

CRH    155


Total contracted payments disclosed above include commitments ofConsolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

Scheme liabilities

The major long-term assumptions used by the Group's actuaries in the computation of scheme liabilities as at 31 December 2011, 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009 are as follows:

  Eurozone  

Britain and

Northern Ireland

  Switzerland  United States 
  

2011

%

  

2010

%

  

2009

%

  

2011

%

  

2010

%

  

2009

%

  

2011

%

  

2010

%

  

2009

%

  

2011

%

  

2010

%

  

2009

%

 
            

Rate of increase in:

                                                

- salaries

  4.00    4.00    4.00    4.00    4.40    4.50    2.25    2.25    2.25    3.50    3.50    3.50  

- pensions in payment

  2.00    2.00    2.00    3.00-3.40    3.40-3.70    3.50-3.70    0.25    0.25    0.50    -    -    -  

Inflation

  2.00    2.00    2.00    3.00    3.40    3.50    1.25    1.50    1.50    2.00    2.00    2.00  

Discount rate

  5.00    5.45    6.00    4.70    5.30    5.75    2.35    2.85    3.25    4.60    5.40    5.75  

Medical cost trend rate

  5.25    5.25    5.25    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    7.00    7.50    9.50  

The mortality assumptions employed in determining the present value of scheme liabilities under IAS 19 are in accordance with the underlying funding valuations and represented actuarial best practice in the relevant jurisdictions taking account of mortality experience and industry circumstances. With regard to the most material of the Group's schemes, the future life expectations factored into the relevant valuations based on retirement at 65 years of age for current and future retirees, are as follows:

   Republic of
Ireland
   Britain and
Northern Ireland
   Switzerland 
    2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2009 

Current retirees

                  

- male

   22.5     20.9     20.7     22.7     22.9     22.7     19.6     18.7     18.5  

- female

   24.1     23.9     23.8     25.3     25.6     25.5     21.9     22.3     22.0  

Future retirees

                  

- male

   25.3     22.1     21.8     24.1     24.6     24.5     19.6     18.7     18.5  

- female

   26.5     25.0     24.8     26.7     27.3     27.2     21.9     22.3     22.0  

The above data allow for future improvements in life expectancy.

Scheme assets

The long-term rates of return expected at 31 December 2011, 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009, determined in conjunction with the Group's actuaries and analysed by class of investment, are as follows:

   Eurozone   Britain and
Northern Ireland
   Switzerland   United States 
   

2011

%

   

2010

%

   

2009

%

   

2011

%

   

2010

%

   

2009

%

   

2011

%

   

2010

%

   

2009

%

   

2011

%

   

2010

%

   

2009

%

 
                        

Equities

   7.50     7.50     8.00     7.50     7.50     8.00     6.05     6.35     6.75     7.50     7.50     8.00  

Bonds

   3.50     4.00     4.50     4.00     4.50     5.00     2.05     2.35     2.75     4.00     5.00     5.50  

Property

   6.50     6.50     7.00     6.50     6.50     7.00     4.75     4.75     4.75     6.50     6.50     7.00  

Other

   1.00     2.50     2.50     1.00     2.50     2.50     1.50     1.75     2.50     1.00     2.50     2.50  

The methodology appliedmillion in relation to the expected return on equities is driven by prevailing risk-free rates in the four jurisdictions listed and the application of an equity risk premium (which varies by country) to those rates. The differences between the expected return on bonds and the yields used to discount the liabilities in each of the four jurisdictions listed are attributable to the fact that the bond assetsschemes reclassified as held by many of the Group's schemes comprise an amalgam of government and corporate bonds. The property and "other" (largely cash holdings) components of the asset portfolio are not significant. In all cases, the reasonableness of the assumed rates of return is assessed by reference to actual and target asset allocations in the long-term and the Group's overall investment strategy as articulated to the trustees of the various defined benefit pension schemes in operation.

156    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

(a) Impact on Consolidated Income Statement

The total expense charged to the Consolidated Income Statement in respect of defined contribution and defined benefit pension schemes, post-retirement healthcare obligations and long-term service commitments is as follows:

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Total defined contribution expense

   134     125     139  

Defined benefit

      

Pension schemes (funded and unfunded)

   24     48     39  

Long-term service commitments (unfunded)

   -     -     1  

Total defined benefit expense

   24     48     40  

Total expense in Consolidated Income Statement

   158     173     179  

At year-end 2011,40 million (2010:33 million) was included in other payables in respect of defined contribution pension liabilities.

Analysis of defined benefit expense

The total defined benefit expense (comprising funded and unfunded defined benefit pension schemes and unfunded post-retirement healthcare obligations and long-term service commitments) is analysed as follows:

  Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 
Charged in arriving at Group profit before finance costs:               

Current service cost

  11    12    13    14    13    8    21    18    17    1    1    6    47    44    44  
Past service cost  (2  2    11    -    -    -    1    -    -    -    -    1    (1  2    12  

Profit on disposal (note 5)

  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (5  -    -    -    -    -    (5  -  

Settlement/curtailment (gain)/loss

  (13  (1  -    (15  (3  (1  (1  -    -    -    1    (23  (29  (3  (24

Subtotal

  (4  13    24    (1  10    7    21    13    17    1    2    (16  17    38    32  
Included in finance revenue and finance costs respectively:               

Expected return on scheme assets

  (33  (37  (35  (30  (27  (23  (23  (22  (20  (10  (10  (9  (96  (96  (87

Interest cost on scheme liabilities

  44    47    42    30    31    24    18    17    17    11    11    12    103    106    95  

Subtotal

  11    10    7    -    4    1    (5  (5  (3  1    1    3    7    10    8  
Net charge to Consolidated Income Statement  7    23    31    (1  14    8    16    8    14    2    3    (13  24    48    40  
Actual return on pension scheme assets  (24  50    70    12    45    63    5    16    45    (1  18    22    (8  129    200  

During 2011, the Group implemented changes to the terms of a number of its defined benefit pension schemes in Britain, the Eurozone and Switzerland giving rise to a gain of29 million in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Based on the assumptions employed for the valuation of assets and liabilities at year-end 2011, the net charge in the 2012 Consolidated Income Statement is anticipated to exhibit an increase from the 2011 figure at constant exchange rates.

CRH    157


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

No reimbursement rights have been recognised as assets in accordance with IAS 19Employee Benefits.

(b) Impact on Consolidated Balance Sheet

The net pension liability (comprising funded and unfunded defined benefit pension schemes and unfunded post-retirement healthcare obligations and long-term service commitments) as at 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010 is analysed as follows:

  Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
 

Equities

  323    357    254    261    190    167    96    101    863    886  

Bonds

  196    198    225    154    240    253    58    52    719    657  

Property

  31    32    37    16    129    109    -    -    197    157  

Other

  16    23    9    9    69    77    5    6    99    115  

Bid value of assets

  566    610    525    440    628    606    159    159    1,878    1,815  
Actuarial value of liabilities (present value)  (926  (844  (652  (594  (715  (635  (249  (216  (2,542  (2,289
Recoverable deficit in schemes  (360  (234  (127  (154  (87  (29  (90  (57  (664  (474
Related deferred income tax asset  54    37    33    43    17    6    36    22    140    108  

Net pension liability

  (306  (197  (94  (111  (70  (23  (54  (35  (524  (366

Split of asset values

  %    %    %    %    %    %    %    %    %    %  

Equities

  57.1    58.5    48.4    59.3    30.3    27.6    60.4    63.5    45.9    48.8  

Bonds

  34.6    32.5    42.9    35.0    38.2    41.7    36.5    32.7    38.3    36.2  

Property

  5.5    5.2    7.0    3.7    20.5    18.0    -    -    10.5    8.7  

Other

  2.8    3.8    1.7    2.0    11.0    12.7    3.1    3.8    5.3    6.3  

Total

  100    100    100    100    100    100    100    100    100    100  

The asset values above include1 million in respect of investment in Ordinary Shares of the Company (CRH plc) as at 31 December 2011 (2010:1 million).

158    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

An increase of 25 basis points in the rate of return on scheme assets would have increased scheme assets by5 million and hence reduced the pension deficit before deferred tax to659 million.

   Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
    2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
 

Analysis of liabilities - funded and unfunded

  

Funded defined benefit pension schemes   (876  (795  (652  (594  (710  (630  (236  (203  (2,474  (2,222
Unfunded defined benefit pension schemes   (36  (33  -    -    -    -    (6  (6  (42  (39
Total - defined benefit pension schemes   (912  (828  (652  (594  (710  (630  (242  (209  (2,516  (2,261
Post-retirement healthcare obligations (unfunded)   (7  (8  -    -    -    -    (7  (7  (14  (15
Long-term service commitments (unfunded)   (7  (8  -    -    (5  (5  -    -    (12  (13
Actuarial value of liabilities (present value)   (926  (844  (652  (594  (715  (635  (249  (216  (2,542  (2,289

The impact of a reduction of 25 basis points in the discount rates applied would be as follows (with a corresponding increase in discount rates being inversely proportional):

Revised discount rate

   4.75    5.20    4.45    5.05    2.10    2.60    4.35    5.15    n/a    n/a  

Revised liabilities figure

   (960  (876  (687  (625  (746  (658  (258  (223  (2,651  (2,382

Post-retirement healthcare benefits - sensitivity analysis on key actuarial assumptions

The impact of the sensitivity analysis on the key actuarial assumptions employed in the valuation of post-retirement healthcare benefits as required under IAS 19Employee Benefits is not material to the Group with materiality defined in the context of the year-end 2011 financial statements.

History of scheme assets, liabilities and actuarial gains and losses

    2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2008
m
  2007
m
 

Bid value of assets

   1,878    1,815    1,605    1,414    1,846  

Actuarial value of liabilities (present value)

   (2,542  (2,289  (2,059  (1,828  (1,931

Asset limit adjustment

   -    -    -    -    (10

Recoverable deficit

   (664  (474  (454  (414  (95

Actual return less expected return on scheme assets

   (104  33    113    (477  (61

% of scheme assets

   (5.5%  1.8%    7.0%    (33.7%  (3.3%
Experience gain/(loss) arising on scheme liabilities (present value)   31    36    (13  (15  (25

% of scheme liabilities (present value)

   (1.2%  (1.6%  0.6%    0.8%    1.3%  

CRH    159


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

Analysis of amounts recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

  Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  

United States

  

Total Group

 
   

2011

m

  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 
Actual return less expected return on scheme assets  (57  13    35    (18  18    40    (18  (6  25    (11  8    13    (104  33    113  
Experience gain/(loss) arising on scheme liabilities (present value)  23    31    (12  4    2    (5  5    1    7    (1  2    (3  31    36    (13
Assumptions loss arising on scheme liabilities (present value)  (102  (50  (21  (33  (27  (117  (48  (16  (17  (22  (9  (12  (205  (102  (167
Actuarial (loss)/gain recognised  (136  (6  2    (47  (7  (82  (61  (21  15    (34  1    (2  (278  (33  (67
Actuarial gains and losses recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income  
Actual return less expected return on scheme assets  (57  13    35    (18  18    40    (18  (6  25    (11  8    13    (104  33    113  
% of scheme assets  (10.1%  2.1%    6.0%    (3.4%  4.1%    10.4%    (2.9%  (1.0%  5.0%    (6.9%  5.0%    9.8%    (5.5%  1.8%    7.0%  
Experience gain/(loss) arising on scheme liabilities (present value)  23    31    (12  4    2    (5  5    1    7    (1  2    (3  31    36    (13
% of scheme liabilities (present value)  (2.5%  (3.7%  1.5%    (0.6%  (0.3%  (0.9%  (0.7%  (0.2%  (1.3%  0.4%    (0.9%  1.6%    (1.2%  (1.6%  0.6%  
Actuarial (loss)/gain recognised  (136  (6  2    (47  (7  (82  (61  (21  15    (34  1    (2  (278  (33  (67
% of scheme liabilities (present value)  14.7%    0.7%    (0.2%  7.2%    1.2%    15.4%    8.5%    3.3%    (2.9%  13.7%    (0.5%  1.0%    10.9%    1.4%    3.3%  

160    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

28. Retirement Benefit Obligationscontinued

Since transition to IFRS on 1 January 2004, the cumulative actuarial loss recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income amounts to617 million (2010:339 million).

Reconciliation of scheme assets (bid value)

  Eurozone  Britain and
Northern Ireland
  Switzerland  United States  Total Group 
   2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
  2011
m
  2010
m
 

At 1 January

  610    584    440    384    606    504    159    133    1,815    1,605  

Movement in year

          

Translation adjustment

  -    -    16    12    17    94    5    10    38    116  
Arising on acquisition (note 31)  3    -    -    -    -    26    -    -    3    26  

Disposals

  -    -    -    -    -    (38  -    -    -    (38

Settlement

  -    (10  (3  (8  -    -    -    -    (3  (18
Employer contributions paid  17    27    77    22    20    21    5    8    119    78  
Contributions paid by plan participants  3    4    -    1    12    11    -    -    15    16  

Benefit payments

  (43  (45  (17  (16  (32  (28  (9  (10  (101  (99
Actual return on scheme assets  (24  50    12    45    5    16    (1  18    (8  129  

At 31 December

  566    610    525    440    628    606    159    159    1,878    1,815  

Reconciliation of actuarial value of liabilities

  

      

At 1 January

  (844  (814  (594  (534  (635  (519  (216  (192  (2,289  (2,059

Movement in year

          

Translation adjustment

  -    -    (20  (17  (18  (99  (7  (14  (45  (130
Arising on acquisition (note 31)  (3  (2  -    -    -    (27  -    -    (3  (29

Disposals

  -    -    -    -    -    43    -    -    -    43  

Current service cost

  (11  (12  (14  (13  (21  (18  (1  (1  (47  (44
Contributions paid by plan participants  (3  (4  -    (1  (12  (11  -    -    (15  (16

Benefit payments

  43    45    17    16    32    28    9    10    101    99  
Past service cost  2    (2  -    -    (1  -    -    -    1    (2
Interest cost on scheme liabilities  (44  (47  (30  (31  (18  (17  (11  (11  (103  (106
Actuarial gain/(loss) arising on:          

—experience variations

  23    31    4    2    5    1    (1  2    31    36  
—changes in assumptions  (102  (50  (33  (27  (48  (16  (22  (9  (205  (102

Settlement/curtailment

  13    11    18    11    1    -    -    (1  32    21  

At 31 December

  (926  (844  (652  (594  (715  (635  (249  (216  (2,542  (2,289

sale. Employer contributions payable in the 20122015 financial year including minimum funding payments (expressed using year-end exchange rates for 2011)2014) are estimated at98 million. The difference between the actual employer contributions paid191 million of which11996 million in 2011relates to schemes reclassified as held for sale.

Average duration and the expectation of52 million included in the 2010 Annual Report is largely attributable to accelerated funding requirements in certain of the Group's schemes which could not have been anticipated at the time of preparation of the year-end 2010 financial statements. Employer contributions are reflected in the reconciliation of scheme assets as paid.composition

 

   Eurozone   Britain and
Northern Ireland
   Switzerland   United States 
    2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012   2014   2013   2012 
Average duration of defined benefit obligation (years)   16.0     15.9     16.9     17.5     18.1     20.8     16.0     16.0     16.0     12.0     13.3     13.2  
Allocation of defined benefit obligation by participant:                        

Active plan participants

   37%     39%     40%     27%     27%     28%     85%     86%     87%     35%     36%     38%  

Deferred plan participants

   21%     20%     20%     34%     34%     34%     -     -     -     30%     30%     30%  

Retirees

   42%     41%     40%     39%     39%     38%     15%     14%     13%     35%     34%     32%  

CRH    161

LOGO

CRH      179


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

29.28. Share Capital and Reserves

 

Equity Share Capital 2014   2013 
 

Ordinary

Shares of

€0.32 each (i)

 

Income

Shares of

€0.02 each (ii)

    

Ordinary

Shares of

0.32 each (i)

 

Income

Shares of

0.02 each (ii)

 
 2011  2010 
Equity Share Capital Ordinary
Shares of
0.32 each
(i)
 Income
Shares  of
0.02 each
(ii)
    Ordinary
Shares of
0.32 each
(i)
 Income
Shares of
0.02 each
(ii)
 

Authorised

          

At 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011 (m)

  320   20  320    20  
Number of Shares at 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011 (‘000s)  1,000,000   1,000,000  1,000,000    1,000,000  
At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 (m)  320    20      320    20  
Number of Shares at 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 (‘000s)  1,000,000    1,000,000      1,000,000    1,000,000  

Allotted, called-up and fully paid

          

At 1 January (m)

  230   14   227    14    237    14     235    14  

Issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends (iii)

  3   -  3    -    2    -      2    -  

At 31 December (m)

  233   14  230    14    239    14      237    14  
The movement in the number of shares (expressed in ‘000s) during the financial year was as follows:     The movement in the number of shares (expressed in ‘000s) during the financial year was as follows:   

At 1 January

  718,508   718,508   710,485    710,485    739,231    739,231     733,821    733,821  

Issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends (iii)

  9,389   9,389  8,023    8,023    5,294    5,294      5,410    5,410  

At 31 December

  727,897   727,897  718,508    718,508    744,525    744,525      739,231    739,231  

 

(i)

The Ordinary Shares represent 93.67%93.68% of the total issued share capital.

 

(ii)

The Income Shares, which represent 5.85% of the total issued share capital, were created on 29 August 1988 for the express purpose of giving shareholders the choice of receiving dividends on either their Ordinary Shares or on their Income Shares (by notice of election to the Company). The Income Shares carried a different tax credit to the Ordinary Shares. The creation of the Income Shares was achieved by the allotment of fully paid Income Shares to each shareholder equal to his/her holding of Ordinary Shares but the shareholder is not entitled to an Income Share certificate, as a certificate for Ordinary Shares is deemed to include an equal number of Income Shares and a shareholder may only sell, transfer or transmit Income Shares with an equivalent number of Ordinary Shares. Income Shares carry no voting rights. Due to changes in Irish tax legislation since the creation of the Income Shares, dividends on the Company’s shares no longer carry a tax credit. As elections made by shareholders to receive dividends on their holding of Income Shares were no longer relevant, the Articles of Association were amended on 8 May 2002 to cancel such elections.

Share schemes

The aggregate number of shares which may be committed for issue in respect of theany share option schemes, thescheme, savings-related share option schemes, thescheme, share participation schemes andscheme, performance share plan or any subsequent option scheme or share option schemes,plan, may not exceed 10% of the issued Ordinaryordinary share capital from time to time.

Share option schemes

Details of share options granted under the Company’s share option schemes and savings-related share option schemes and the terms attaching thereto are provided in note 87 to the financial statements and on pages 86 to 89page 112 of the Report on Directors’ Remuneration.Remuneration Report.

 

   Number of Shares 
    2011   2010 

Options exercised during the year (satisfied by the reissue of Treasury Shares)

   248,806     2,680,751  
   Number of Shares 
    2014   2013 

Options exercised during the year (satisfied by the reissue of Treasury Shares)

   1,307,406         1,310,187  

Share participation schemes

As at 31 December 2011, 7,118,587 (2010: 7,079,443)2014, 7,509,125 (2013: 7,386,047) Ordinary Shares had been appropriated to participation schemes. In the financial year ended 31 December 2011,2014, the appropriation of 39,144123,078 shares was satisfied by the reissue of Treasury Shares (2010: 300,974)(2013: 113,415). The Ordinary Shares appropriated pursuant to these schemes were issued at market value on the dates of appropriation. The shares issued pursuant to these schemes are excluded from the scope of IFRS 2Share-based Payment and are hence not factored into the expense computation and the associated disclosures in note 8.7.

162    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

29. Share Capital and Reservescontinued

Performance Share Plan

In accordance withDuring the terms of the Performance Share Plan (see note 8),year, 742,604 Ordinary Shares have been purchasedwere acquired by the Employee Benefit Trust by way of the reissue of Treasury Shares by CRH plc to satisfy the release of shares in respect of the 2011 award under the 2006 Performance Share Plan.

Restricted Share Plan

During 2013, the Employee Benefit Trust purchased 391,250 shares on behalf of CRH plc. The numberplc in respect of these shares held as atawards under the balance sheet date was as follows:2013 Restricted Share Plan. There were no such purchases in 2014.

  Number of Shares 
   2011  2010 

At 1 January

  163,226    462,753  
Released by the Employee Benefit Trust to the participants of the Performance Share Plan*  (163,226  (299,527

At 31 December

  -    163,226  

The nominal value of own shares, on which dividends have been waived by the Trustees of the Performance2013 Restricted Share Plan, amounted tonil0.1 million at 31 December 2011 (2010:2014 (2013:0.060.1 million).

*In addition to the 163,226 Ordinary Shares referred to above, a further 150,330 Ordinary Shares were acquired by the Employee Benefit Trust by way of the reissue of Treasury Shares by CRH plc to satisfy the release of shares in respect of the 2008 award under the Performance Share Plan.

(iii) Issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividendsdividends:

   Number of Shares     Price per Share 
    2014   2013   2012      2014   2013   2012 
May 2014 - Final 2013 dividend (2013: Final 2012 dividend; 2012: Final 2011 dividend)   4,081,636     2,011,165     2,653,368     20.99    17.01    15.40  
October 2014 - Interim 2014 dividend (2013: Interim 2013 dividend; 2012: Interim 2012 dividend)   1,212,700     3,398,992     3,270,169     17.81    15.79    14.27  
Total   5,294,336     5,410,157     5,923,537         

 

  Number of Shares    Price per Share 
   2011  2010  2009    2011  2010  2009 
May 2011 - Final 2010 dividend (2010: Final 2009 dividend; 2009: Final 2008 dividend)  6,950,139    7,308,591    6,588,110    15.35   17.86   13.83  
October 2011 - Interim 2011 dividend (2010: Interim 2010 dividend; 2009: Interim 2009 dividend)  2,438,854    714,402    3,307,480    11.50   12.76   17.20  

Total

  9,388,993    8,022,993    9,895,590      
180      CRH


28. Share Capital and Reserves|continued

 

  5% Cumulative   7% ‘A’ Cumulative 
  Preference Shares of   Preference Shares of 
Preference Share Capital  5% Cumulative
Preference Shares
of1.27 each
(iv)
   7% 'A' Cumulative
Preference Shares
of1.27 each
(v)
   €1.27 each(iv)    €1.27 each(v) 
  Number
of Shares
('000s)
   m   Number
of Shares
('000s)
   m   Number of       Number of     
          Shares ‘000s              €m           Shares ‘000s              €m 

Authorised

                 

At 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011

   150     -     872     1  

At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014

   150     -      872     1  

Allotted, called-up and fully paid

                 

At 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011

   50     -     872     1  

At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014

   50     -      872     1  

There was no movement in the number of cumulative preference shares in either the current or the prior year.

 

(iv)

The holders of the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are entitled to a fixed cumulative preference dividend at a rate of 5% per annum and priority in a winding-up to repayment of capital, but have no further right to participate in profits or assets and are not entitled to be present or vote at general meetings unless their dividend is in arrears. Dividends on the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are payable half-yearly on 15 April and 15 October in each year. The 5% Cumulative Preference Shares represent 0.03% of the total issued share capital.

 

(v)

The holders of the 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are entitled to a fixed cumulative preference dividend at a rate of 7% per annum, and subject to the rights of the holders of the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares, priority in a winding-up to repayment of capital, but have no further right to participate in profits or assets and are not entitled to be present or vote at general meetings unless their dividend is in arrears or unless the business of the meeting includes certain matters, which are specified in the Articles of Association. Dividends on the 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are payable half-yearly on 5 April and 5 October in each year. The 7% ‘A'‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares represent 0.45%0.44% of the total issued share capital.

 

CRH    163


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Treasury Shares/own shares     

2014

€m

   

        2013

m

 

At 1 January

    (118   (146

Treasury Shares/own shares reissued

    42     34  

Shares acquired by Employee Benefit Trust (own shares)

     -     (6

At 31 December

     (76   (118

As at the balance sheet date, the total number of Treasury Shares held was 3,775,455 (2013: 5,951,104); the nominal value of these shares was1 million (2013:2 million). During the year ended 31 December 2014, 1,430,484 (2013: 1,423,602) shares were reissued to satisfy exercises and appropriations under the Group’s share option and share participation schemes and 2,561 (2013: nil) shares were reissued to satisfy deferred share awards. In addition, 742,604 (2013: nil) shares were reissued to the CRH plc Employee Benefit Trust in connection with the release of the award under the 2006 Performance Share Plan. These reissued Treasury Shares were previously purchased at an average price of19.40 (2013:24.08). No Treasury Shares were purchased during 2014 or 2013.

Reconciliation of shares issued to net proceeds

 

    2014

€m

  

        2013

m

   

        2012

m

 

Shares issued at nominal amount:

    

- scrip shares issued in lieu of cash dividends

  2    2     2  

Premium on shares issued

  105    86     86  

Total value of shares issued

  107    88     88  

Issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends (note 11)

  (107  (88   (88

Net proceeds from issue of shares

  -    -     -  
Share Premium     

2014

€m

   

2013

m

 

At 1 January

   4,219     4,133  

Premium arising on shares issued

      105     86  

At 31 December

      4,324     4,219  

 

 

29. Share Capital and Reservescontinued

Treasury Shares/own shares

   

2011

m

  

2010

m

 
   

At 1 January

   (199  (279

Treasury/own shares reissued

   16    80  

At 31 December

   (183  (199

As at the balance sheet date, the total number of Treasury Shares held was 8,919,195 (2010: 9,357,475); the nominal value of these shares was3 million (2010:3 million). During the year ended 31 December 2011, 287,950 shares were reissued (2010: 2,981,725) to satisfy exercises and appropriations under the Group's share option and share participation schemes (see above). In addition, 150,330 shares were reissued to the CRH plc Employee Benefit Trust in connection with the release of the award under the Performance Share Plan (see above). These reissued Treasury Shares were previously purchased at an average price of24.17 (2010:23.87). No Treasury Shares were purchased during the year ended 31 December 2011 (2010: nil).

Reconciliation of shares issued to proceeds shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

    2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 

Shares issued at nominal amount:

    

- shares issued in respect of Rights Issue

   -    -    52  

- scrip shares issued in lieu of cash dividends

   3    3    3  

Premium on shares issued

   132    137    1,370  

Total value of shares issued

   135    140    1,425  

Issue of scrip shares in lieu of cash dividends (note 12)

   (135  (140  (148

Proceeds from issue of shares

   -    -    1,277  

Expenses paid in respect of share issues

   -    -    (40

Net proceeds from issue of shares - Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

   -    -    1,237  

Share Premium

   

2011

m

   

2010

m

 
    

At 1 January

   3,915     3,778  

Premium arising on shares issued

   132     137  

At 31 December

   4,047     3,915  

164    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

30. Commitments under Operating and Finance Leases

Operating leases

Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases at 31 December are as follows:

    

2014

€m

   

        2013

m

   

        2012

m

 

Within one year

   310     301     270  

After one year but not more than five years

   663     596     653  

More than five years

   417     357     398  
    1,390       1,254       1,321  

Total operating lease commitments disclosed above include commitments of54 million in relation to businesses classified as held for sale.

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Within one year

   251     257     230  

After one year but not more than five years

   615     595     506  

More than five years

   384     415     358  
    1,250     1,267     1,094  

Finance leases

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases are not material for the Group.

 

LOGO

CRH      181


LOGO

 

31.30. Business Combinations and Acquisitions of Joint Ventures

The principal acquisitions completed during the year ended 31 December 20112014 by reportable segment, together with the completion dates, are detailed below; these transactions entailed the acquisition of an effective 100% stake except where indicated to the contrary below:contrary:

Europe Materials:Heavyside:BelgiumDenmark: VVM Group (2 August);Finland: Karvian Betoni and Kauhajoen Valmisbetoni (24 October);Portugal: Lafarge Portugal aggregates and readymixed selected assets of a precast concrete business (49%(11 August);Ireland: selected assets of Cemex Ireland (31 August).

Europe Distribution: Belgium: Heumatop (24 March), JV, 30Costermans (2 July) and Van Den Broeck (17 July);France: assets of two Toute Faire Materiaux branches (1 April);the Netherlands: Hoogeveen branch of Kroon Bouwcenter (9 April).

Americas Materials: Iowa: Shipley Contracting asphalt plant and paving assets (6 June);UkraineKentucky:: Lviv Beton (23 May) and Odessa Cement (51%, 21 December).

Europe Products:Australia: Unicon (18 March);Belgium: Juma (25 January);France: Poussard (1 July);theNetherlands: Hylas (30 March).

Europe Distribution:Belgium: Sani Perfect (75%, 28 January), Sanibel (21 November) and Schrauwen (20 December);France: Ploton (45%, JV, 1 February);theNetherlands: selected assets of the De Jong group (28MAC Construction & Excavating (5 November).

Americas Materials:Colorado: Isgar Reserves (16 August);MichiganMaine:: National Asphalt Products (50%, 4 May);Minnesota: New Ulm Quartzite Quarries (22 July);Mississippi: JJ Ferguson (15 February);Missouri: Everett Quarries (15 July);New Hampshire: Columbia Sand & Gravel (27 May);New Jersey: North Bergen Companies (1 August);New Mexico: readymixed concrete Marriner quarry (10 April) and sand & gravelselected assets of Sky Ute (15 April, also Colorado)Lane Construction (26 September);OhioTexas:: Sidwell reserves (18 January) and Cunningham Asphalt and Paving (30 December);Oklahoma: limestone reserves in Tulsa (24 October);Pennsylvania: Powers Stone (18 November);Texas: selected assets of Austin Reclaimed Materials and Shumaker Enterprises (4 February), Ironhorse Concrete (3 June) and Lindsey Contractors (4 November)Capitol Aggregates (6 May);UtahVirginia:: Marriott Kendrick reserves (4 February)(6 August);VirginiaWashington:: Piedmont JV (50%, 8 April) and Southside Materials JV (50%, 29 April) asphalt assets of Eucon Corporation in Spokane (15 December);West VirginiaVirginia:: Central Supply (30 September) assets of Yellowstar Materials (7 January).

Americas Products:Products:Québec California:: Transpavé (3 assets of Kristar Enterprises (6 January);North and South Carolina: concrete pipe assets of MC Precast (19 May);FloridaIowa:: Duratek Precast Structures (13 April);Indiana: Rogers Block (22 July);Massachusetts: Outdoor World (15 December).

Americas Distribution:Georgia: American Wholesale Building Supply (14 Thermomass (10 September);HawaiiTexas:: Pacific Source (13 September);Michigan: Astro Building assets of Hope Agri Products (22 June);Minnesota: United Products(20 February, also Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma) and assets of Ashley Concrete (19 December, also Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin);Pennsylvania: Ivan Supply (27 October);Texas: Austin Acoustical Materials (24 June)May).

 

CRH    165


Consolidated Financial Statements

The identifiable net assets acquired, including adjustments to provisional fair values, were as follows:    

2014

€m

     

2013

m

     

2012

m

 

Assets

            

Non-current assets

            

Property, plant and equipment

     91       342       253  

Intangible assets

     16       39       65  

Equity accounted investments

     -       2       -  

Deferred income tax assets

     -       -       10  

Total non-current assets

     107       383       328  

Current assets

            

Inventories

     23       41       98  

Trade and other receivables (i)

     20       53       103  

Cash and cash equivalents

     1       11       19  

Total current assets

     44       105       220  

Liabilities

            

Trade and other payables

     (17     (80     (57

Provisions for liabilities (stated at net present cost)

     (1     (14     (1

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings and finance leases

     (7     (44     (42

Current income tax liabilities

     -       -       (3

Deferred income tax liabilities

     (2     (8     (19

Total liabilities

     (27     (146     (122

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

     124       342       426  

Goodwill arising on acquisition (ii)

     31       169       162  

Excess of fair value of identifiable net assets over consideration paid (ii)

     -       (2     -  

Non-controlling interests*

     -       (1     -  

Total consideration

     155       508       588  

Consideration satisfied by:

            

Cash payments

     152       347       437  

Asset exchange (note 4)

     -       144       -  

Deferred consideration (stated at net present cost)

     1       4       75  

Contingent consideration (iii)

     2       13       76  

Total consideration

     155       508       588  

* Measured at the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets.

  

    

Net cash outflow arising on acquisition

            

Cash consideration

     152       347       437  

Less: cash and cash equivalents acquired

     (1     (11     (19

Total

     151       336       418  

 

182      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


31.30. Business Combinations and Acquisitions of Joint Ventures|continued

The identifiable net assets acquired, including adjustments to provisional fair values, were as follows:

    

2011

m

  

2010

m

  

2009

m

 

Assets

    

Non-current assets

    

Property, plant and equipment

   339    321    110  

Intangible assets

   29    45    2  

Investments in associates

   -    4    -  

Other financial assets

   -    2    -  

Deferred income tax assets

   2    1    4  

Total non-current assets

   370    373    116  

Current assets

    

Inventories

   53    92    11  

Trade and other receivables (i)

   62    80    22  

Cash and cash equivalents

   24    33    4  

Total current assets

   139    205    37  

Liabilities

    

Non-current liabilities

    

Deferred income tax liabilities

   (29  (29  (2

Retirement benefit obligations

   -    (3  -  

Provisions for liabilities (stated at net present cost)

   (14  (6  (1

Non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings and finance leases

   (33  (10  (2

Total non-current liabilities

   (76  (48  (5

Current liabilities

    

Trade and other payables

   (49  (64  (14

Current income tax liabilities

   -    (6  -  

Provisions for liabilities (stated at net present cost)

   (1  (1  -  

Current interest-bearing loans and borrowings and finance leases

   (14  (27  (1

Total current liabilities

   (64  (98  (15

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

   369    432    133  

Goodwill arising on acquisition (ii)

   207    82    64  

Excess of fair value of identifiable net assets over consideration paid (ii)

   (5  -    -  

Non-controlling interests*

   2    (6  (4

Associate becoming a subsidiary

   -    -    (7

Total consideration

   573    508    186  

Consideration satisfied by:

    

Cash payments

   531    469    178  

Deferred consideration (stated at net present cost)

   14    26    7  

Contingent consideration (iii)

   28    (3  1  
   573    492    186  

Profit on step acquisition

   -    16    -  

Total consideration

   573    508    186  

* Measured at the non-controlling interests' proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets.

  

Net cash outflow arising on acquisition

    

Cash consideration

   531    469    178  

Less: cash and cash equivalents acquired

   (24  (33  (4

Total

   507    436    174  

166    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

31. Business Combinations and Acquisitions of Joint Venturescontinued

None of the acquisitions completed during the financial years 2011, 20102014, 2013 or 20092012 were considered sufficiently material to warrant separate disclosure of the attributable fair values. The initial assignment of fair values to identifiable net assets acquired has been performed on a provisional basis in respect of certain acquisitions; any amendments to these fair values made during the subsequent reporting window (within the measurement period imposed by IFRS 3)3Business Combinations) will be subject to subsequent disclosure.

 

(i)The gross contractual value of trade and other receivables as at the respective dates of acquisition amounted to6522 million (2010:(2013:8357 million; 2012:106 million). The fair value of these receivables is6220 million (all of which is expected to be recoverable) (2010:(2013:8053 million; 2012:103 million) and is inclusive of an aggregate allowance for impairment of32 million (2010:(2013:4 million; 2012:3 million).

 

(ii)The principal factor contributing to the recognition of goodwill on acquisitions entered into by the Group is the realisation of cost savings and other synergies with existing entities in the Group which do not qualify for separate recognition as intangible assets. Due to the asset-intensive nature of operations in the Europe Heavyside and Americas Materials business segments, no significant intangible assets are recognised on business combinations in these segments.8218 million of the goodwill recognised in respect of acquisitions completed in 20112014 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes (2010:(2013:4649 million). AnNo excess of fair value of identifiable net assets over consideration of5 million arose during the year and is included in operating income in note 3.(2013:2 million; 2012:nil million).

 

(iii)The fair value of contingent consideration recognised at date of acquisition is282 million arrived at through discounting the expected payment (based on scenario modelling)(including adjustments to present value at the respective acquisition dates. In general, in order for contingent consideration to become payable, pre-defined profit and/or profit/net asset ratios must be exceeded.prior year acquisitions of1 million). On an undiscounted basis, the corresponding future payments on current year acquisitions for which the Group may be liable range from13nil million to a maximum of531 million. There have been no significant changes in the possible outcomes of contingent consideration recognised on acquisitions completed in 2010.

Acquisition-related costs amounting to32 million (2010:(2013:32 million; 2012:4 million) have been included in operating costs in the Consolidated Income Statement (note 3)2).

No contingent liabilities were recognised on the acquisitions completed during the financial year or the prior financial years.

CRH    167


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

31. Business Combinations and Acquisitions of Joint Venturescontinued

The carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities acquired determined in accordance with IFRS before completion of the acquisition, together with the adjustments made to those carrying values to arrive at the fair values disclosed above, were as follows:

 

 

Book

values

€m

 

Fair value

  adjustments

€m

 

  Accounting

policy

alignments

€m

 

Adjustments

to provisional

fair values

€m

 

Fair

        value

€m

 
 Book
values
m
 Fair value
adjustments
m
 Accounting
policy
alignments
m
 Adjustments
to provisional
fair values
m
 Fair
value
m
 

Non-current assets

  221    151    -    (2  370    95    11    -    1    107  

Current assets

  146    -    (1  (6  139    45    (3  -    2    44  

Non-current liabilities

  (56  (23  -    3    (76

Current liabilities

  (71  -    -    7    (64

Non-controlling interests

  -    -    -    2    2  

Liabilities

  (22  (2  -    (3  (27

Identifiable net assets acquired

  240    128    (1  4    371    118    6    -    -    124  

Goodwill arising on acquisition (see ii above)

  327    (128  1    2    202  
Goodwill arising on acquisition (see (ii) above)  38    (5  -    (2  31  
Total consideration  567    -    -    6    573    156    1    -    (2  155  
The equivalent disclosure for 2010 is as follows:     

Non-current assets

  251    117    (1  6    373  

Current assets

  195    8    -    2    205  

Non-current liabilities

  (50  3    -    (1  (48

Current liabilities

  (84  (9  -    (5  (98

Non-controlling interests

  (6  -    -    -    (6

Identifiable net assets acquired

  306    119    (1  2    426  

Goodwill arising on acquisition

  191    (103  1    (7  82  
Total consideration (including profit on step acquisition)  497    16    -    (5  508  

The equivalent disclosure for 2009 is as follows:

     
The equivalent disclosure for 2013 is as follows:The equivalent disclosure for 2013 is as follows:   

Non-current assets

  87    28    -    1    116    257    106    -    20    383  

Current assets

  37    1    -    (1  37    130    (12  (2  (11  105  

Non-current liabilities

  (4  (1  -    -    (5

Current liabilities

  (16  1    -    -    (15

Liabilities

  (107  (34  -    (5  (146

Identifiable net assets acquired

  280    60    (2  4    342  

Non-controlling interests

  -    (4  -    -    (4  (2  1    -    -    (1

Identifiable net assets acquired

  104    25    -    -    129  

Associate becoming a subsidiary

  (7  -    -    -    (7

Goodwill arising on acquisition

  91    (25  -    (2  64    224    (61  2    2    167  

Total consideration

  188    -    -    (2  186    502    -    -    6    508  
The equivalent disclosure for 2012 is as follows:The equivalent disclosure for 2012 is as follows:   

Non-current assets

  178    155    -    (4  329  

Current assets

  217    2    -    -    219  

Liabilities

  (95  (19  (1  (7  (122

Identifiable net assets acquired

  300    138    (1  (11  426  

Goodwill arising on acquisition

  287    (138  1    12    162  

Total consideration

  587    -    -    1    588  

LOGO

CRH      183


LOGO

30. Business Combinations| continued

The following table analyses the 4321 acquisitions (2010: 28(2013: 25 acquisitions; 2009: 142012: 32 acquisitions) by reportable segment and provides details of the goodwill and consideration figures arising in each of those segments:

Reportable segments

   Number of
Acquisitions
   Goodwill   Consideration** 
    2011   2010   2009   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
   2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Europe Materials

   5     5     2     99     3     2     213     102     11  

Europe Products

   4     -     -     4     -     -     9     -     -  

Europe Distribution

   5     2     1     8     34     4     26     146     12  

Americas Materials

   19     18     10     55     42     60     214     238     164  

Americas Products

   4     2     -     5     8     -     28     24     -  

Americas Distribution

   6     1     1     29     2     -     77     3     1  

Group totals

   43     28     14     200     89     66     567     513     188  

**Includes profit on step acquisition in 2010

168    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

31. Business Combinations and Acquisitions of Joint Venturescontinued

The post-acquisition impact of acquisitions completed during the year on Group profit for the financial year was as follows:

    2011
m
  2010
m
  2009
m
 

Revenue

   157    174    43  

Cost of sales

   (111  (131  (35

Gross profit

   46    43    8  

Operating costs

   (30  (29  (5

Group operating profit

   16    14    3  

Loss on disposals

   (1  -    -  

Profit before finance costs

   15    14    3  

Finance costs (net)

   (4  (2  (1

Profit before tax

   11    12    2  

Income tax expense

   (3  (3  (1

Group profit for the financial year

   8    9    1  
Reportable segments  

Number of

acquisitions

   Goodwill   Consideration 
    

  2014

   

  2013

   

  2012

   

  2014

€m

  

  2013

m

   

  2012

m

   

  2014

€m

  

  2013

m

   

  2012

m

 

Europe Heavyside

   2     6     2     2    80     25     7    265     58  

Europe Lightside

   -     -     4     -    -     68     -    -     151  

Europe Distribution

   6     3     3     9    10     8     20    15     40  

Europe

   8     9     9     11    90     101     27    280     249  

Americas Materials

   8     9     14     5    19     34     71    76     226  

Americas Products

   5     4     9     17    48     14     59    124     112  

Americas Distribution

   -     3     -     -    8     -     -    22     -  

Americas

   13     16     23     22    75     48     130    222     338  

Total Group

   21     25     32     33    165     149     157    502     587  

Adjustments to provisional fair values of prior year acquisitions

  

   (2  4     13     (2  6     1  

Total

         31    169     162     155    508     588  
The post-acquisition impact of acquisitions completed during the year on the Group’s profit/(loss) for the financial year was as follows:  
                            

  2014

€m

  

    2013

m

  

    2012

m

 

Revenue

               122    306    270  

Cost of sales

                     (89  (232  (201

Gross profit

               33    74    69  

Operating costs

                     (26  (63  (56

Group operating profit

               7    11    13  

Profit on disposals

                     -    -    -  

Profit before finance costs

               7    11    13  

Finance costs (net)

                     -    (3  (2

Profit before tax

               7    8    11  

Income tax expense

                     (2  (2  (4

Group profit for the financial year

                     5    6    7  

The revenue and profitprofit/(loss) of the Group for the financial year determined in accordance with IFRS as though the acquisitions effected during the year had been at the beginning of the year would have been as follows:

 

  Pro-forma 2014   
  Pro-forma 2011       

2014

acquisitions

€m

   

CRH Group excluding

2014 acquisitions

€m

 

Pro-forma

consolidated

Group

€m

 

Pro-forma

2013

m

 
  2011
acquisitions
m
   CRH Group
excluding 2011
acquisitions
m
   

Pro-forma
consolidated
Group

m

   

Pro-forma
2010

m

 

Revenue

   465     17,924     18,389     17,749     182     18,790    18,972    18,159  

Group profit for the financial year

   11     589     600     462  
Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   7     579    586    (300
  Pro-forma 2013   
  

2013

acquisitions

m

   

CRH Group excluding

2013 acquisitions

m

 

Pro-forma

consolidated

Group

m

 

Pro-forma

2012

m

 

Revenue

   434     17,725    18,159    19,054  
Group (loss)/profit for the financial year   1     (301  (300  571  

The equivalent disclosure for 2010 is as follows:

   Pro-forma 2010     
    2010
acquisitions
m
   CRH Group
excluding 2010
acquisitions
m
   

Pro-forma
consolidated
Group

m

   

Pro-forma
2009

m

 

Revenue

   750     16,999     17,749     17,518  

Group profit for the financial year

   32     430     462     616  

There have been no acquisitions completed subsequent to the balance sheet date which would be individually material to the Group, thereby requiring disclosure under either IFRS 3 or IAS 10Events after the Balance Sheet Date. Details of events after the balance sheet date are set out in note 33. Development updates, giving details of acquisitions which do not require separate disclosure on the grounds of materiality, are typically published in January and July each year.

 

CRH    169

184      CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

32.31. Related Party Transactions

The principal related party relationships requiring disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group under IAS 24Related Party Disclosures pertain to: the existence of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates; transactions with these entities entered into by the Group; and the identification and compensation of key management personnel.

Subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of the Company (CRH plc, the ultimate parent) and its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates as documented in the accounting policies on pages 104139 to 117.145. The Group'sGroup’s principal subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are disclosed in Exhibit 8 toof this Annual Report.Report on Form 20-F.

Sales to and purchases from joint ventures are immaterial in the context of the year-end 2011 financial statements.2014, 2013 and 2012. Loans extended by the Group to joint ventures and associates (see note 16)15) are included in financial assets (whilst the Group's share of the corresponding loans payable by joint ventures is included in interest-bearing loans and borrowings due to the application of proportionate consolidation in accounting for the Group's interests in these entities).assets. Sales to and purchases from associates during the financial year ended 31 December 20112014 amounted to2533 million (2010:(2013:2724 million; 2009:2012:1721 million) and488411 million (2010:(2013:479411 million; 2009:2012:458 milion)446 million) respectively. Amounts receivable from and payable to associatesequity accounted investments (arising from the aforementioned sales and purchases transactions) as at the balance sheet date are included as separate line items in notes 1817 and 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Terms and conditions of transactions with subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates

In general, the transfer pricing policy implemented by the Group across its subsidiaries is market-based. Sales to and purchases from joint ventures and associates are conducted in the ordinary course of business and on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-lengtharm’s-length transactions. The outstanding balances included in receivables and payables as at the balance sheet date in respect of transactions with joint ventures and associates are unsecured and settlement arises in cash. No guarantees have been either requested or provided in relation to related party receivables and payables. Loans to joint ventures and associates (the respective amounts being(as disclosed in note 16)15) are extended on normal commercial terms in the ordinary course of business with interest accruing and, in general, paid to the Group at predetermined intervals.

Key management personnel

For the purposes of the disclosure requirements of IAS 24, the term "key“key management personnel"personnel” (i.e. those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company) comprises the Board of Directors which manages the business and affairs of the Company.

Key management remuneration amounted to:

    2011
m
   2010
m
   2009
m
 

Short-term benefits

   6     6     6  

Post-employment benefits

   2     2     2  

Share-based payments (i)

   2     2     2  

Total

   10     10     10  

(i)Calculated in accordance with the principles disclosed in note 8.
Key management remuneration amounted to:  

2014

€m

     

2013

m

     

2012

m

 

Short-term benefits

   9       7       6  

Post-employment benefits

   1       2       2  

Share-based payments - calculated in accordance with the principles disclosed in note 7

   2       2       2  

Total

   12       11       10  

Other than these compensation entitlements, there were no other transactions involving key management personnel.

 

170

32. Contingent Liabilities

On 30 May 2014, CRH announced that the secretariat of the Competition Commission in Switzerland had invited CRH’s Swiss subsidiaries BR Bauhandel AG, Gétaz-Miauton SA and Regusci Reco SA, to comment on a proposal to impose sanctions on the Association of Swiss Wholesalers of the Sanitary Industry and all other major Swiss wholesalers, including CRH’s subsidiaries, regarding the pending investigation into the sanitary (bathroom fixtures and fittings) industry in Switzerland. The secretariat alleges competition law infringements and proposes a total fine of approximately CHF 283 million on all parties, of which approximately CHF 119 million (99 million) is attributable to CRH’s Swiss subsidiaries, based on Swiss turnover.


CRH believes that the position of the secretariat is fundamentally ill-founded and views the proposed fine as unjustified. The Group has made submissions to this effect to the Competition Commission. Any decision of the Competition Commission on this matter is not expected before April 2015. Any decision finding an infringement can be appealed to the Federal Administrative Tribunal, and ultimately to the Federal Supreme Court. No provision has been made in respect of this proposed fine in the 2014 Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

LOGO

CRH      185


LOGO

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS33. Events after the Balance Sheet Date

On 1 February 2015, CRH announced that it had made a binding irrevocable offer to acquire certain of the businesses and assets of Lafarge S.A. (‘Lafarge’) and Holcim Ltd (‘Holcim’ and together with Lafarge the ‘Sellers’) comprising a global portfolio of assets in the building materials industry (which are complementary to CRH’s footprint) for an enterprise value of6.5 billion (based on exchange rates at 30 January 2015). The consideration will be paid in a combination of euro, Sterling and Canadian Dollars.

The proposed acquisition constitutes a Class 1 transaction under the UKLA Listing Rules and therefore requires the approval of a simple majority of CRH’s shareholders. An Extraordinary General Meeting (‘EGM’) will be held on 19 March 2015 to seek shareholder approval of the acquisition. If the acquisition is not approved by CRH’s shareholders at the EGM, a termination fee of approximately158 million in total will be payable by CRH to the Sellers. A termination fee of approximately158 million will be payable by the Sellers to CRH in either of the following circumstances: 1) if the Sellers do not accept CRH’s offer; or 2) if the proposed merger of Lafarge and Holcim (the ‘Merger’) does not proceed to successful completion.

The acquisition is also conditional upon: 1) the successful completion of the Merger; and 2) the completion of certain local reorganisations that need to take place before completion of the acquisition. In addition, CRH has committed to the Sellers that it will take all steps and do all things necessary to obtain regulatory approvals required in relation to the acquisition. The long stop date for completion of the acquisition is the earlier of: 1) three months following completion of the Merger; or 2) 31 December 2015, but in any case no earlier than 31 August 2015.

In connection with the proposed acquisition, CRH completed a placing of 74,039,915 new Ordinary Shares raising gross proceeds of approximately1.6 billion, and representing approximately 9.99% of CRH’s issued ordinary share capital before the placing. Closing of the placing and admission of the placing shares to the official lists and to trading on the main markets of the London Stock Exchange and Irish Stock Exchange took place on 5 February 2015.

On 1 February 2015, CRH agreed a6.5 billion senior unsecured bridge loan facility which has subsequently been reduced by1.6 billion to reflect the proceeds of the placing and by a further2.0 billion to reflect other cash balances which are intended to fund the acquisition. The remaining2.9 billion of the loan facilities are available to be used to complete the debt-funded portion of the proposed acquisition. Subject to certain carve-outs, the facilities contain provisions requiring mandatory prepayment from disposal proceeds and the proceeds of capital market transactions. Other terms and conditions are otherwise substantially similar to CRH’s existing2.5 billion revolving credit facility dated 11 June 2014.

 

 

33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information

The following consolidating information presents Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at 31 December 20112014 and 20102013 and Condensed GroupConsolidated Income Statements and GroupCondensed Consolidated Cash Flows for the years ended 31 December 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 of the Company and CRH America, Inc. ("CRHA") as required by Article 3-10(c) of Regulation S-X. This information is prepared in accordance with IFRS with the exception that the subsidiaries are accounted for as investments under the equity method rather than being consolidated. CRHACRH America, Inc. is 100% owned by the company. The Guarantees of the guarantorGuarantor are full and unconditional.

CRH America Inc. (the “Issuer”) has the following notes which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CRH plc (the “Guarantor”):

US$350 million 4.125% Notes due 2016 – listed on the New York Stock Exchange

US$1,250 million 6.000% Notes due 2016 – listed on the New York Stock Exchange

US$650 million 8.125% Notes due 2018 – listed on the New York Stock Exchange

US$400 million 5.75% Notes due 2021 – listed on the New York Stock Exchange

US$300 million 6.40% Notes due 2033 – listed on the Irish Stock Exchange

186      CRH


34. Supplemental Guarantor Information|continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2014

   Guarantor
€m
            Issuer
€m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
€m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

€m

  CRH and
    subsidiaries
€m
 

ASSETS

     

Non-current assets

     
Property, plant and equipment  -    -    7,422    -    7,422  
Intangible assets  -    -    4,173    -    4,173  
Subsidiaries  4,239    218    1,682    (6,139  -  
Investments accounted for using the equity method  -    -    1,329    -    1,329  
Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings  -    3,923    -    (3,923  -  
Other financial assets  -    -    23    -    23  
Other receivables  -    -    85    -    85  
Derivative financial instruments  -    48    39    -    87  

Deferred income tax assets

  -    -    171    -    171  

Total non-current assets

  4,239    4,189    14,924    (10,062  13,290  

Current assets

     
Inventories  -    -    2,260    -    2,260  
Trade and other receivables  -    10    2,634    -    2,644  
Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings  5,532    -    1,003    (6,535  -  
Current income tax recoverable  -    -    15    -    15  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    15    -    15  
Cash and cash equivalents  1,411    25    1,826    -    3,262  
Assets held for sale  -    -    531    -    531  

Total current assets

  6,943    35    8,284    (6,535  8,727  

Total assets

  11,182    4,224    23,208    (16,597  22,017  

EQUITY

     
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders  10,177    1,606    4,533    (6,139  10,177  
Non-controlling interests  -    -    21    -    21  

Total equity

  10,177    1,606    4,554    (6,139  10,198  

LIABILITIES

     

Non-current liabilities

     
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  -    2,518    2,901    -    5,419  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    3    -    3  
Deferred income tax liabilities  -    -    1,305    -    1,305  
Other payables  -    -    257    -    257  
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings  -    -    3,923    (3,923  -  
Retirement benefit obligations  -    -    711    -    711  
Provisions for liabilities  -    -    257    -    257  

Total non-current liabilities

  -    2,518    9,357    (3,923  7,952  

Current liabilities

     
Trade and other payables  -    54    2,840    -    2,894  
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings  1,003    -    5,532    (6,535  -  
Current income tax liabilities  -    -    154    -    154  
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  2    46    399    -    447  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    20    -    20  
Provisions for liabilities  -    -    139    -    139  
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale  -    -    213    -    213  

Total current liabilities

  1,005    100    9,297    (6,535  3,867  

Total liabilities

  1,005    2,618    18,654    (10,458  11,819  

Total equity and liabilities

  11,182    4,224    23,208    (16,597  22,017  

LOGO

CRH      187


LOGO

34. Supplemental Guarantor Information|continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 December 20112013

 

    CRH
m
  CRHA
m
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
m
   Eliminate and
Reclassify
m
  CRH and
Subsidiaries
m
 

ASSETS

       

Non-current assets

       

Property, plant and equipment

   -    -    8,936     -    8,936  

Intangible assets

   -    -    4,488     -    4,488  

Subsidiaries

   5,733    124    1,682     (7,539  -  

Investments accounted for using the equity method

   -    -    948     -    948  

Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings

   -    3,839    -     (3,839  -  

Other financial assets

   -    -    239     -    239  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    122    59     -    181  

Deferred income tax assets

   -    -    290     -    290  

Total non-current assets

   5,733    4,085    16,642     (11,378  15,082  

Current assets

       

Inventories

   -    -    2,286     -    2,286  

Trade and other receivables

   -    -    2,663     -    2,663  

Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings

   6,494     1,881     (8,375  -  

Current income tax recoverable

   -    -    8     -    8  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    9    15     -    24  

Liquid investments

   -    -    29     -    29  

Cash and cash equivalents

   167    962    166     -    1,295  

Total current assets

   6,661    971    7,048     (8,375  6,305  

Total assets

   12,394    5,056    23,690     (19,753  21,387  

EQUITY

       

Equity share capital

   247    -    -     -    247  

Preference share capital

   1    -    -     -    1  

Share premium account

   4,047    1,747    262     (2,009  4,047  

Treasury Shares and own shares

   (183  -    -     -    (183

Other reserves

   168    -    168     (168  168  

Foreign currency translation reserve

   (119  -    -     -    (119

Retained income

   6,348    (298  5,660     (5,362  6,348  

Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders

   10,509    1,449    6,090     (7,539  10,509  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    74     -    74  

Total equity

   10,509    1,449    6,164     (7,539  10,583  

LIABILITIES

       

Non-current liabilities

       

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

   -    3,207    1,256     -    4,463  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    -    20     -    20  

Deferred income tax liabilities

   -    -    1,492     -    1,492  

Trade and other payables

   -    -    204     -    204  

Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings

   -    -    3,839     (3,839  -  

Retirement benefit obligations

   -    -    664     -    664  

Provisions for liabilities

   -    -    252     -    252  

Total non-current liabilities

   -    3,207    7,727     (3,839  7,095  

Current liabilities

       

Trade and other payables

   -    44    2,814     -    2,858  

Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings

   1,881    -    6,494     (8,375  -  

Current income tax liabilities

   1    -    200     -    201  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

   3    356    160     -    519  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    -    10     -    10  

Provisions for liabilities

   -    -    121     -    121  

Total current liabilities

   1,885    400    9,799     (8,375  3,709  

Total liabilities

   1,885    3,607    17,526     (12,214  10,804  

Total equity and liabilities

   12,394    5,056    23,690     (19,753  21,387  

CRH    171


Consolidated Financial Statements

   Guarantor
m
             Issuer
m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

m

  CRH and
    subsidiaries
m
 

ASSETS

     

Non-current assets

     
Property, plant and equipment  -    -    7,539    -    7,539  
Intangible assets  -    -    3,911    -    3,911  
Subsidiaries  4,603    183    1,682    (6,468  -  
Investments accounted for using the equity method  -    -    1,340    -    1,340  
Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings  -    3,469    -    (3,469  -  
Other financial assets  -    -    23    -    23  
Other receivables  -    -    93    -    93  
Derivative financial instruments  -    58    5    -    63  
Deferred income tax assets  -    -    107    -    107  
Total non-current assets  4,603    3,710    14,700    (9,937  13,076  
Current assets     
Inventories  -    -    2,254    -    2,254  
Trade and other receivables  -    9    2,507    -    2,516  
Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings  6,394    -    1,453    (7,847  -  
Current income tax recoverable  -    -    26    -    26  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    17    -    17  
Cash and cash equivalents  175    174    2,191    -    2,540  
Total current assets  6,569    183    8,448    (7,847  7,353  
Total assets  11,172    3,893    23,148    (17,784  20,429  
EQUITY     
Capital and reserves attributable to the Company’s equity holders  9,662    1,413    5,055    (6,468  9,662  
Non-controlling interests  -    -    24    -    24  
Total equity  9,662    1,413    5,079    (6,468  9,686  
LIABILITIES     
Non-current liabilities     
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  -    2,279    2,300    -    4,579  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    34    -    34  
Deferred income tax liabilities  -    -    1,166    -    1,166  
Other payables  -    -    289    -    289  
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings  -    -    3,469    (3,469  -  
Retirement benefit obligations  -    -    410    -    410  
Provisions for liabilities  -    -    231    -    231  
Total non-current liabilities  -    2,279    7,899    (3,469  6,709  
Current liabilities     
Trade and other payables  -    54    2,700    -    2,754  
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings  1,453    -    6,394    (7,847  -  
Current income tax liabilities  -    -    151    -    151  
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings  57    147    757    -    961  
Derivative financial instruments  -    -    19    -    19  
Provisions for liabilities  -    -    149    -    149  
Total current liabilities  1,510    201    10,170    (7,847  4,034  
Total liabilities  1,510    2,480    18,069    (11,316  10,743  
Total equity and liabilities  11,172    3,893    23,148    (17,784  20,429  

 

188      CRH


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

 

   Year ended 31 December 2014 
    Guarantor
€m
              Issuer
€m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
€m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

€m

  CRH and
subsidiaries
€m
 

Revenue

   -    -    18,912    -    18,912  

Cost of sales

   -    -    (13,427  -    (13,427

Gross profit

   -    -    5,485    -    5,485  

Operating income/(costs)

   1,208    -    (5,776  -    (4,568

Group operating profit/(loss)

   1,208    -    (291  -    917  

Profit on disposals

   -    -    77    -    77  

Profit/(loss) before finance costs

   1,208    -    (214  -    994  

Finance costs

   -    (211  (262  219    (254

Finance income

   -    219    8    (219  8  

Other financial expense

   -    -    (42  -    (42

Share of subsidiaries’ (loss)/profit before tax

   (504  35    -    469    -  

Share of equity accounted investments’ profit

   55    -    55    (55  55  

Profit/(loss) before tax

   759    43    (455  414    761  

Income tax expense

   (177  (17  (160  177    (177

Group profit/(loss) for the financial year

   582    26    (615  591    584  

Profit/(loss) attributable to:

      

Equity holders of the Company

   582    26    (617  591    582  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    2    -    2  

Group profit/(loss) for the financial year

   582    26    (615  591    584  

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

  

Group profit for the financial year

   582    26    (615  591    584  

Other comprehensive income

      
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:    
Currency translation effects   599    167    432    (599  599  
Losses relating to cash flow hedges   (6  -    (6  6    (6
    593    167    426    (593  593  
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:    
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations   (414  -    (414  414    (414
Tax on items recognised directly within other comprehensive income   69    -    69    (69  69  
    (345  -    (345  345    (345
Total other comprehensive income for the financial year   248    167    81    (248  248  
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   830    193    (534  343    832  
Attributable to:      
Equity holders of the Company   830    193    (536  343    830  
Non-controlling interests   -    -    2    -    2  
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   830    193    (534  343    832  

 

LOGO

CRH      189


LOGO

 

33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2010

    

CRH

m

  

CRHA

m

  

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

m

   

Eliminate and
Reclassify

m

  

CRH and
Subsidiaries

m

 
       

ASSETS

       

Non-current assets

       

Property, plant and equipment

   -    -    8,892     -    8,892  

Intangible assets

   -    -    4,305     -    4,305  

Subsidiaries

   5,306    120    1,682     (7,108  -  

Investments accounted for using the equity method

   -    -    1,037     -    1,037  

Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings

   -    3,742    -     (3,742  -  

Other financial assets

   -    -    149     -    149  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    155    39     -    194  

Deferred income tax assets

   -    35    350     -    385  

Total non-current assets

   5,306    4,052    16,454     (10,850  14,962  

Current assets

       

Inventories

   -    -    2,187     -    2,187  

Trade and other receivables

   -    -    2,419     -    2,419  

Advances to subsidiaries and parent undertakings

   6,519    -    1,655     (8,174  -  

Current income tax recoverable

   -    -    112     -    112  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    -    14     -    14  

Liquid investments

   -    -    37     -    37  

Cash and cash equivalents

   163    1,334    233     -    1,730  

Total current assets

   6,682    1,334    6,657     (8,174  6,499  

Total assets

   11,988    5,386    23,111     (19,024  21,461  

EQUITY

       

Equity share capital

   244    -    -     -    244  

Preference share capital

   1    -    -     -    1  

Share premium account

   3,915    1,747    155     (1,902  3,915  

Treasury Shares and own shares

   (199  -    -     -    (199

Other reserves

   147    -    147     (147  147  

Foreign currency translation reserve

   (226  -    -     -    (226

Retained income

   6,446    (315  5,374     (5,059  6,446  

Capital and reserves attributable to the Company's equity holders

   10,328    1,432    5,676     (7,108  10,328  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    83     -    83  

Total equity

   10,328    1,432    5,759     (7,108  10,411  

LIABILITIES

       

Non-current liabilities

       

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

   -    3,453    1,242     -    4,695  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    -    33     -    33  

Deferred income tax liabilities

   -    -    1,693     -    1,693  

Trade and other payables

   -    -    163     -    163  

Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings

   -    -    3,742     (3,742  -  

Retirement benefit obligations

   -    -    474     -    474  

Provisions for liabilities

   -    -    253     -    253  

Total non-current liabilities

   -    3,453    7,600     (3,742  7,311  

Current liabilities

       

Trade and other payables

   -    40    2,646     -    2,686  

Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings

   1,655    -    6,519     (8,174  -  

Current income tax liabilities

   1    -    198     -    199  

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

   4    461    201     -    666  

Derivative financial instruments

   -    -    54     -    54  

Provisions for liabilities

   -    -    134     -    134  

Total current liabilities

   1,660    501    9,752     (8,174  3,739  

Total liabilities

   1,660    3,954    17,352     (11,916  11,050  

Total equity and liabilities

   11,988    5,386    23,111     (19,024  21,461  

172    CRH


Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

33. Supplemental Guarantor Informationcontinued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

 

   Year ended 31 December 2011 
    CRH
m
  CRHA
m
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
m
  Eliminate and
Reclassify
m
  CRH and
Subsidiaries
m
 

Revenue

   -    -    18,081    -    18,081  

Cost of sales

   -    -    (13,179  -    (13,179

Gross profit

   -    -    4,902    -    4,902  

Operating income/(costs)

   39    -    (4,070  -    (4,031

Group operating profit

   39    -    832    -    871  

Profit on disposals

   14    -    41    -    55  

Profit before finance costs

   53    -    873    -    926  

Finance costs

   -    (294  (273  305    (262

Finance income

   -    305    33    (305  33  

Other financial expense

   -    -    (28  -    (28

Share of subsidiaries’ profit before tax

   609    4    -    (613  -  

Group share of associates’ profit after tax

   42    -    42    (42  42  

Profit before tax

   704    15    647    (655  711  

Income tax expense

   (114  (39  (75  114    (114

Group profit for the financial year

   590    (24  572    (541  597  

Profit attributable to:

      

Equity holders of the Company

   590    (24  565    (541  590  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    7    -    7  

Group profit for the financial year

   590    (24  572    (541  597  

CRH    173


Consolidated Financial Statements

   Year ended 31 December 2013 
    Guarantor
m
               Issuer
m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

m

  CRH and
subsidiaries
m
 
Revenue   -    -    18,031    -    18,031  
Cost of sales   -    -    (13,153  -    (13,153
Gross profit   -    -    4,878    -    4,878  
Operating income/(costs)   3    -    (4,781  -    (4,778
Group operating profit   3    -    97    -    100  
Profit on disposals   -    -    26    -    26  
Profit before finance costs   3    -    123    -    126  
Finance costs   -    (242  (270  250    (262
Finance income   -    250    13    (250  13  
Other financial expense   -    -    (48  -    (48
Share of subsidiaries’ (loss)/profit before tax   (175  33    -    142    -  
Share of equity accounted investments’ loss   (44  -    (44  44    (44
(Loss)/profit before tax   (216  41    (226  186    (215
Income tax expense   (80  (16  (64  80    (80
Group (loss)/profit for the financial year   (296  25    (290  266    (295
(Loss)/profit attributable to:      
Equity holders of the Company   (296  25    (291  266    (296
Non-controlling interests   -    -    1    -    1  
Group (loss)/profit for the financial year   (296  25    (290  266    (295
Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income  
Group (loss)/profit for the financial year   (296  25    (290  266    (295
Other comprehensive income      
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:     
Currency translation effects   (373  (57  (316  373    (373
Losses relating to cash flow hedges   (2  -    (2  2    (2
    (375  (57  (318  375    (375
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:     
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations   162    -    162    (162  162  
Tax on items recognised directly within other comprehensive income   (43  -    (43  43    (43
    119    -    119    (119  119  
Total other comprehensive income for the financial year   (256  (57  (199  256    (256
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   (552  (32  (489  522    (551
Attributable to:      
Equity holders of the Company   (552  (32  (490  522    (552
Non-controlling interests   -    -    1    -    1  
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   (552  (32  (489  522    (551

 

190      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

 

  Year ended 31 December 2012 
  Year ended 31 December 2010   Guarantor
m
              Issuer
m
 Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
m
 

Eliminate and
reclassify

m

 CRH and
subsidiaries
m
 
  CRH
m
 CRHA
m
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
m
 Eliminate  and
Reclassify
m
 CRH and
Subsidiaries
m
 

Revenue

   -    -    17,173    -    17,173     -    -    18,084    -    18,084  

Cost of sales

   -    -    (12,363  -    (12,363   -    -    (13,018  -    (13,018

Gross profit

   -    -    4,810    -    4,810     -    -    5,066    -    5,066  

Operating income/(costs)

   15    -    (4,127  -    (4,112   1,004    -    (5,265  -    (4,261

Group operating profit

   15    -    683    -    698  
Group operating profit/(loss)   1,004    -    (199  -    805  

Profit on disposals

   -    -    55    -    55     2    -    228    -    230  

Profit before finance costs

   15    -    738    -    753     1,006    -    29    -    1,035  

Finance costs

   -    (364  (394  378    (380   -    (205  (279  213    (271

Finance income

   -    378    133    (378  133     -    213    15    (213  15  

Other financial expense

   -    -    -    -    -     -    -    (49  -    (49

Share of subsidiaries’ profit before tax

   484    20    -    (504  -  

Group share of associates’ profit after tax

   28    -    28    (28  28  

Profit before tax

   527    34    505    (532  534  
Share of subsidiaries’ (loss)/profit before tax   (278  28    -    250    -  
Share of equity accounted investments’ loss   (84  -    (84  84    (84
Profit/(loss) before tax   644    36    (368  334    646  

Income tax expense

   (95  (4  (91  95    (95   (106  (14  (92  106    (106

Group profit for the financial year

   432    30    414    (437  439  
Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   538    22    (460  440    540  

Profit attributable to:

   -      
Profit/(loss) attributable to:      

Equity holders of the Company

   432    30    407    (437  432     538    22    (462  440    538  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    7    -    7     -    -    2    -    2  

Group profit for the financial year

   432    30    414    (437  439  
Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   538    22    (460  440    540  
Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive IncomeSupplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income  
Group profit/(loss) for the financial year   538    22    (460  440    540  
Other comprehensive income      
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:     
Currency translation effects   (51  (26  (25  51    (51
Gains relating to cash flow hedges   1    -    1    (1  1  
   (50  (26  (24  50    (50
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent years:     
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations   (146  -    (146  146    (146
Tax on items recognised directly within other comprehensive income   23    -    23    (23  23  
   (123  -    (123  123    (123
Total other comprehensive income for the financial year   (173  (26  (147  173    (173
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   365    (4  (607  613    367  
Attributable to:      
Equity holders of the Company   365    (4  (608  613    366  
Non-controlling interests   -    -    1    -    1  
Total comprehensive income for the financial year   365    (4  (607  613    367  

 

174    CRHLOGO


Consolidated Financial Statements

 

CRH      191

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


LOGO

 

33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Income Statement of Cash Flow

 

   Year ended 31 December 2009 
    CRH
m
  CRHA
m
  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
m
  Eliminate  and
Reclassify
m
  CRH and
Subsidiaries
m
 

Revenue

   -    -    17,373    -    17,373  

Cost of sales

   -    -  �� (12,510  -    (12,510

Gross profit

   -    -    4,863    -    4,863  

Operating costs

   10    -    (3,918  -    (3,908

Group operating profit

   10    -    945    -    955  

Profit on disposals

   -    -    26    -    26  

Profit before finance costs

   10    -    971    -    981  

Finance costs

   -    (20  (277  -    (297

Finance income

   -    -    -    -    -  

Other financial expense

   -    -    -    -    -  

Share of subsidiaries' profit before tax

   668    30    -    (698  -  

Group share of associates' profit after tax

   48    -    48    (48  48  

Profit before tax

   726    10    742    (746  732  

Income tax expense

   (134  21    (155  134    (134

Group profit for the financial year

   592    31    587    (612  598  

Profit attributable to:

      

Equity holders of the Company

   592    31    581    (612  592  

Non-controlling interests

   -    -    6    -    6  

Group profit for the financial year

   592    31    587    (612  598  

CRH    175


Consolidated Financial Statements

   Year ended 31 December 2014 
    Guarantor
€m
              Issuer
€m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
€m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

€m

  CRH and
subsidiaries
€m
 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Profit/(loss) before tax   759    43    (455  414    761  
Finance costs (net)   -    (8  296    -    288  
Group share of subsidiaries’ loss/(profit) before tax   504    (35  -    (469  -  
Share of equity accounted investments’ result   (55  -    (55  55    (55
Profit on disposals   -    -    (77  -    (77
Group operating profit/(loss)   1,208    -    (291  -    917  
Depreciation charge   -    -    631    -    631  
Amortisation of intangible assets   -    -    44    -    44  
Impairment charge   -    -    49     49  
Share-based payment expense   -    -    16    -    16  
Other (primarily pension payments)   -    -    (66  -    (66
Net movement on working capital and provisions   -    (7  42    -    35  
Cash generated from operations   1,208    (7  425    -    1,626  
Interest paid (including finance leases)   -    (211  (270  219    (262
Corporation tax paid   -    (17  (110  -    (127
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities   1,208    (235  45    219    1,237  
Cash flows from investing activities      
Proceeds from disposals   -    -    345    -    345  
Interest received   -    219    8    (219  8  
Dividends received from equity accounted investments   -    -    30    -    30  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment   -    -    (435  -    (435
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings   414    17    -    (431  -  
Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired)   -    -    (151  -    (151
Other investments and advances   -    -    (3  -    (3
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid   -    -    (26  -    (26
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities   414    236    (232  (650  (232
Cash flows from financing activities      
Proceeds from exercise of share options   22    -    -    -    22  
Acquisition of non-controlling interests   -    -    (1  -    (1
Advances to subsidiary and parent undertakings   -    -    (431  431    -  
Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   -    -    901    -    901  
Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments   -    16    (27  -    (11
Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   (55  (175  (704  -    (934
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company   (353  -    -    -    (353
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests   -    -    (4  -    (4
Net cash outflow from financing activities   (386  (159  (266  431    (380
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   1,236    (158  (453  -    625  
Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents      
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January   175    174    2,191    -    2,540  
Translation adjustment   -    9    121    -    130  
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   1,236    (158  (453  -    625  
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December   1,411    25    1,859    -    3,295  

 

192      CRH

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow

 

  Year ended 31 December 2013 
  Year ended 31 December 2011   Guarantor
m
              Issuer
m
 Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
m
 

Eliminate and
reclassify

m

 CRH and
subsidiaries
m
 
  

CRH

m

 

CRHA

m

 

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

m

 

Eliminate and
Reclassify

m

 

CRH and
Subsidiaries

m

 

Cash flows from operating activities

            

Profit before tax

   704    15    647    (655  711  
(Loss)/profit before tax   (216  41    (226  186    (215

Finance costs (net)

   -    (11  268    -    257     -    (8  305    -    297  

Group share of subsidiaries' profit before tax

   (609  (4  -    613    -  

Group share of associates' profit after tax

   (42  -    (42  42    (42
Group share of subsidiaries’ loss/(profit) before tax   175    (33  -    (142  -  
Share of equity accounted investments’ result   44    -    44    (44  44  

Profit on disposals

   (14  -    (41  -    (55   -    -    (26  -    (26

Group operating profit

   39    -    832    -    871     3    -    97    -    100  

Depreciation charge (including impairments)

   -    -    742    -    742  

Amortisation of intangible assets (including impairments)

   -    -    43    -    43  
Depreciation charge   -    -    671    -    671  
Amortisation of intangible assets   -    -    54    -    54  
Impairment charge   -    -    650    -    650  

Share-based payment expense

   -    -    21    -    21     -    -    15    -    15  

Other movements

   -    -    (109  -    (109
Other (primarily pension payments)   -    -    (96  -    (96

Net movement on working capital and provisions

   -    3    (214  -    (211   -    1    76    -    77  

Cash generated from operations

   39    3    1,315    -    1,357     3    1    1,467    -    1,471  

Interest paid (including finance leases)

   -    (294  (250  305    (239   -    (242  (277  250    (269

Decrease in liquid investments

   -    -    4    -    4  

Corporation tax paid

   -    (5  (91  -    (96   -    (16  (94  -    (110

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities

   39    (296  978    305    1,026     3    (257  1,096    250    1,092  

Cash flows from investing activities

            

Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)

   17    -    425    -    442  
Proceeds from disposals   -    -    122    -    122  

Interest received

   -    305    32    (305  32     -    250    13    (250  13  

Dividends received from associates

   -    -    20    -    20  
Dividends received from equity accounted investments   -    -    33    -    33  

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   -    -    (576  -    (576   -    -    (497  -    (497

Advances from/(to) subsidiary and parent undertakings

   253    24    (277  -    -  

Acquisition of subsidiaries and joint ventures (net of cash acquired)

   -    -    (507  -    (507
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings   299    179    -    (478  -  
Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired)   -    -    (336  -    (336

Other investments and advances

   -    -    (24  -    (24   -    -    (78  -    (78

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid

   -    -    (21  -    (21   -    -    (105  -    (105

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities

   270    329    (928  (305  (634   299    429    (848  (728  (848

Cash flows from financing activities

            

Proceeds from exercise of share options

   6    -    -    -    6     19    -    -    -    19  

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

   -    -    (11  -    (11   -    -    (13  -    (13
Advances to subsidiary and parent undertakings   -    -    (478  478    -  

Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   -    -    101    -    101     55    -    1,436    -    1,491  

Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments

   -    27    (90  -    (63   -    43    21    -    64  
Treasury/own shares purchased   (6  -    -    -    (6

Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   (1  (446  (105  -    (552   -    (601  15    -    (586

Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company

   (310  -    -    -    (310   (367  -    -    -    (367

Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

   -    -    (9  -    (9   -    -    (1  -    (1

Net cash outflow from financing activities

   (305  (419  (114  -    (838

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   4    (386  (64  -    (446
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities   (299  (558  980    478    601  
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   3    (386  1,228    -    845  

Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents

            

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

   163    1,334    233    -    1,730     172    570    1,005    -    1,747  

Translation adjustment

   -    14    (3  -    11     -    (10  (42  -    (52

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   4    (386  (64  -    (446   3    (386  1,228    -    845  

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

   167    962    166    -    1,295     175    174    2,191    -    2,540  

 

LOGO

 

176    CRH

CRH      193


Consolidated Financial StatementsLOGO

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

33.34. Supplemental Guarantor Information| continued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow

 

   Year ended 31 December 2010 
   CRH  CRHA  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminate and
Reclassify
  CRH and
Subsidiaries
 
    m  m  m  m  m 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Profit before tax   527    34    505    (532  534  
Finance costs (net)   -    (14  261    -    247  
Group share of subsidiaries’ profit before tax   (484  (20  -    504    -  
Group share of associates’ profit after tax   (28  -    (28  28    (28
Profit on disposals   -    -    (55  -    (55
Group operating profit   15    -    683    -    698  
Depreciation charge (including impairments)   -    -    786    -    786  
Amortisation of intangible assets (including impairments)   -    -    131    -    131  
Share-based payment expense   -    -    19    -    19  
Other movements   -    -    (35  -    (35
Net movement on working capital and provisions   -    (14  156    -    142  
Cash generated from operations   15    (14  1,740    -    1,741  
Interest paid (including finance leases)   -    (364  (297  378    (283
Decrease in liquid investments   -    -    33    -    33  
Corporation tax paid   1    -    (101  -    (100
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities   16    (378  1,375    378    1,391  
Cash flows from investing activities      
Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)   -    -    188    -    188  
Interest received   -    378    35    (378  35  
Dividends received from associates   -    -    51    -    51  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment   -    -    (466  -    (466
Advances from/(to) subsidiary and parent undertakings   246    1,475    (1,721  -    -  
Acquisition of subsidiaries and joint ventures (net of cash acquired)   -    -    (436  -    (436
Other investments and advances   -    -    (67  -    (67
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid   -    -    (27  -    (27
Increase in finance-related receivables   -    -    115    -    115  
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities   246    1,853    (2,328  (378  (607
Cash flows from financing activities      
Proceeds from exercise of share options   45    -    -    -    45  
Acquisition of non-controlling interests   -    -    (2  -    (2
Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   -    (195  761    -    566  
Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments   -    65    17    -    82  
Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   2    -    (887  -    (885
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company   (298  -    -    -    (298
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests   -    -    (6  -    (6
Net cash outflow from financing activities   (251  (130  (117  -    (498
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   11    1,345    (1,070  -    286  
Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents      
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January   152    -    1,220    -    1,372  
Translation adjustment   -    (11  83    -    72  
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   11    1,345    (1,070  -    286  
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December   163    1,334    233    -    1,730  

CRH    177


Consolidated Financial Statements

   Year ended 31 December 2012 
    Guarantor
m
               Issuer
m
  Non-Guarantor
subsidiaries
m
  

Eliminate and
reclassify

m

  CRH and
subsidiaries
m
 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Profit before tax   644    36    (368  334    646  
Finance costs (net)   -    (8  313    -    305  
Group share of subsidiaries’ loss/(profit) before tax   278    (28  -    (250  -  
Share of equity accounted investments’ result   84    -    84    (84  84  
Profit on disposals   (2  -    (228  -    (230
Group operating profit/(loss)   1,004    -    (199  -    805  
Depreciation charge   -    -    686    -    686  
Amortisation of intangible assets   -    -    44    -    44  
Impairment charge   -    -    28    -    28  
Share-based payment expense   -    -    14    -    14  
Other (primarily pension payments)   -    -    (152  -    (152
Net movement on working capital and provisions   -    3    (61  -    (58
Cash generated from operations   1,004    3    360    -    1,367  
Interest paid (including finance leases)   -    (205  (266  213    (258
Corporation tax paid   (1  (14  (109  -    (124
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities   1,003    (216  (15  213    985  
Cash flows from investing activities      
Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)   2    -    780    -    782  
Interest received   -    213    16    (213  16  
Dividends received from equity accounted investments   -    -    35    -    35  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment   -    -    (544  -    (544
Advances to subsidiary and parent undertakings   (653  (42  -    695    -  
Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired)   -    -    (418  -    (418
Other investments and advances   -    -    (56  -    (56
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid   -    -    (30  -    (30
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities   (651  171    (217  482    (215
Cash flows from financing activities      
Proceeds from exercise of share options   16    -    -    -    16  
Acquisition of non-controlling interests   -    -    (2  -    (2
Advances from subsidiary and parent undertakings   -    -    695    (695  -  
Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   -    -    487    -    487  
Net cash flow arising from derivative financial instruments   -    25    (12  -    13  
Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases   (1  (363  (30  -    (394
Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company   (362  -    -    -    (362
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests   -    -    (4  -    (4
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities   (347  (338  1,134    (695  (246
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   5    (383  902    -    524  
Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents      
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January   167    962    117    -    1,246  
Translation adjustment   -    (9  (14  -    (23
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   5    (383  902    -    524  
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December   172    570    1,005    -    1,747  

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

33. Supplemental Guarantor Informationcontinued

Supplemental Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow

   Year ended 31 December 2009 
    

CRH

m

  

CRHA

m

  

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

m

  

Eliminate and
Reclassify

m

  

CRH and
Subsidiaries

m

 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Profit before tax

   726    10    742    (746  732  

Finance costs (net)

   -    20    277    -    297  

Group share of subsidiaries' profit before tax

   (668  (30  -    698    -  

Group share of associates' profit after tax

   (48  -    (48  48    (48

Profit on disposals

   -    -    (26  -    (26

Group operating profit

   10    -    945    -    955  

Depreciation charge (including impairments)

   -    -    794    -    794  

Amortisation of intangible assets (including impairments)

   -    -    54    -    54  

Share-based payment expense

   (13  -    41    -    28  

Other movements

   -    -    (37  -    (37

Net movement on working capital and provisions

   -    (25  765    -    740  

Cash generated from operations

   (3  (25  2,562    -    2,534  

Interest paid (including finance leases)

   -    (428  (274  408    (294

Decrease in liquid investments

   -    -    65    -    65  

Corporation tax paid

   (2  -    (102  -    (104

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities

   (5  (453  2,251    408    2,201  

Cash flows from investing activities

      

Proceeds from disposals (net of cash disposed)

   -    -    103    -    103  

Interest received

   -    408    31    (408  31  

Dividends received from associates

   -    -    38    -    38  

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   -    -    (532  -    (532

Advances (to)/from subsidiary and parent undertakings

   (1,050  92    958    -    -  

Acquisition of subsidiaries and joint ventures (net of cash acquired)

   -    -    (174  -    (174

Other investments and advances

   -    -    (244  -    (244

Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration paid

   -    -    (37  -    (37

Increase in finance-related receivables

   -    -    (115  -    (115

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities

   (1,050  500    28    (408  (930

Cash flows from financing activities

      

Proceeds from issue of shares (net)

   1,237    -    -    -    1,237  

Proceeds form exercise of share options

   60    -    -    -    60  

Increase in interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   -    -    757    -    757  

Net cash inflow arising from derivative financial instruments

   -    147    (131  -    16  

Treasury/own shares purchased

   (2  -    -    -    (2

Repayment of interest-bearing loans, borrowings and finance leases

   1    (236  (2,266  -    (2,501

Dividends paid to equity holders of the Company

   (238  -    -    -    (238

Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

   -    -    (7  -    (7

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities

   1,058    (89  (1,647  -    (678

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   3    (42  632    -    593  

Reconciliation of opening to closing cash and cash equivalents

      

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

   149    42    608    -    799  

Translation adjustment

   -    -    (20  -    (20

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   3    (42  632    -    593  

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

   152    -    1,220    -    1,372  

34. Board Approval

The Board of Directors approved and authorised for issue the financial statements on pages 100 to 178 in respect of the year ended 31 December 2011 on 28 March 2012.

178    CRH


Shareholder Information

CRH    179

194      CRH

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION


LOGO

CRH      195


Shareholder InformationLOGO

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

 

Shareholder Information

Stock Exchange Listings

CRH has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange. CRH’sExchange and a secondary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange was re-classified from primary to secondary on 6 December 2011. As the Company retained its premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, the re-classification has no material effect on the shareholder rights and investor protections applicable to an interest in CRH.Exchange.

American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), each representing one Ordinary Share, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The ADSs are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) issued by The Bank of New York Mellon (the “Depositary”) as Depositary under an Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated 28 November 2006. Each ADS represents one Ordinary Share of the Company. The ticker symbol for the ADSs on the NYSE is CRH.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing sales prices for the Ordinary Shares in euro on the Irish Stock Exchange from 20072010 through 236 March 20122015 and in Sterling on the London Stock Exchange from 6 December 2011 as(as the London Stock Exchange became CRH’s sole premium listing on that date.date) through 6 March 2015. The table also sets forth, for the same periods, the high and low closing sale prices for the ADSs on the NYSE.

 

  Sterling per   Euro per   US Dollars 
  Ordinary Share    Ordinary Share    per ADS 
  Sterling per
Ordinary Share*
 Euro per
Ordinary Share*
 US Dollars
per ADS*
    High    Low       High    Low       High     Low  
  High Low High Low High   Low 

Calendar Year

                    

2007

     34.44    19.76   $48.01    $29.30  

2008

     24.50    12.44   $37.78    $15.73  

2009

     20.70    11.50   $30.53    $17.37  

2010

     22.00    11.51   $29.43    $14.77         22.00   11.51      $29.43     $14.77  

2011

   £12.80(i)   £11.09(i)   17.00(ii)   10.50(ii)  $24.95    $14.38     £12.80(i)   £11.09(i)     17.00(ii)   10.50(ii)     $24.95     $14.38  

2012

   £14.09   £10.52      16.79   12.99      $22.20     $16.35  

2013

   £16.17   £12.15      19.30   14.68      $26.26     $19.56  

2014

   £17.88   £12.66      21.82   15.86      $29.72     $20.47  

2010

        

2013

            

First Quarter

     19.52    16.42   $28.48    $22.65     £15.40   £12.15      17.86   14.68      $23.05     $19.56  

Second Quarter

     22.00    16.73   $29.44    $20.79     £14.77   £12.59      17.36   14.81      $22.24     $19.62  

Third Quarter

     17.18    11.51   $22.16    $14.76     £15.27   £12.92      18.13   15.19      $24.60     $19.86  

Fourth Quarter

     15.94    11.64   $21.03    $16.26     £16.17   £14.19      19.30   16.85      $26.26     $23.26  

2011

        

2014

            

First Quarter

     17.00    14.30   $23.60    $18.58     £17.88   £15.39      21.82   18.47      $29.72     $25.32  

Second Quarter

     16.75    14.05   $24.95    $20.22     £17.75   £15.01      21.40   18.74      $29.71     $25.85  

Third Quarter

     15.48    10.50   $22.56    $14.38     £15.55   £13.43      19.58   16.81      $26.77     $22.71  

Fourth Quarter

   £12.80(i)   £11.09(i)   15.36(ii)   11.32(ii)  $20.22    $15.21     £15.79   £12.66      20.04   15.86      $24.52     $20.47  

Recent Months

                    

September 2011

     12.60    10.50   $17.85    $14.38  

October 2011

     14.16    11.32   $20.22    $15.21  

November 2011

     14.25    12.07   $19.15    $16.31  

December 2011

   £12.80(i)   £11.09(i)   15.36(ii)   13.18(ii)  $19.82    $17.13  

January 2012

   £13.40    £12.06    16.20    14.62   $20.89    $18.71  

February 2012

   £13.77    £12.76    16.22    15.15   $21.69    $19.85  

March 2012 (through 23 March 2012)

   £14.09    £12.63    16.79    15.09   $22.20    $19.93  

September 2014

   £14.88   £13.85      18.58   17.47      $24.20     $22.81  

October 2014

   £14.02   £12.66      18.00   15.86      $22.69     $20.47  

November 2014

   £15.11   £13.52      19.00   17.00      $23.45     $21.45  

December 2014

   £15.79   £14.21      20.04   17.85      $24.52     $22.17  

January 2015

   £16.80   £14.71      22.35   18.73      $25.06     $22.51  

February 2015

   £18.47   £17.18      25.32   22.97      $28.47     $25.80  

March 2015

            

(through 6 March 2015)

   £18.13   £17.70      24.98   24.40      $28.20     $27.02  

 

*Ordinary Share and ADS data for 2007 and 2008 have been adjusted for the bonus element of the March 2009 Rights Issue by applying a factor of 1.1090.
(i)

The Sterling high and low closing prices displayed for 2011, based on the London Stock Exchange, are only for the period from 6 December 2011, from which date it became the sole premium listing.

(ii)

The euro high and low closing prices displayed for 2011 are for the entire period shown and based on the Irish Stock Exchange. On 6 December 2011, the listing was re-classified from primary to secondary. The high and low euro closing prices only for the period to 6 December 2011 were:17.00 and10.50 for 2011;14.30 and11.32 for the fourth quarter of 2011; and14.30 and14.05 for December 2011.Exchange prices.

For further information on CRH shares see note 2928 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

180    CRH


Shareholder Information

 

196      CRH


SHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONShareholder Information|continued

Ownership of Ordinary Shares

Shareholdings as at 31 December 20112014

 

Geographic Location*  

Number of shares
held

’000s

   % of total 
Geographic Location1  

Number of

shares held

‘000s

   % of total 

North America

   309,829     41.61  

United Kingdom

   185,851     24.96  

Europe/Other

   146,313     20.10     125,413     16.85  

Retail

   87,458     11.75  

Ireland

   41,855     5.75     32,198     4.32  

North America

   312,722     42.96  

Retail

   74,586     10.25  

United Kingdom

   143,502     19.71  

Treasury

   8,919     1.23     3,776     0.51  
   727,897     100     744,525     100  

 

*1

This represents a best estimate of the number of shares controlled by fund managers resident in the geographic regions indicated. Private shareholders are classified as retail above.

 

Holdings  Number of
Shareholders
   % of total   Number of
shares held
’000s
   % of total   

Number of

Shareholders

   % of total   

Number of

shares held

‘000s

   % of total 

1 - 1,000

   16,106     58.93     5,759     0.79     14,973     60.13     4,989     0.67  

1,001 - 10,000

   9,566     35.00     27,888     3.83     8,375     33.63     24,431     3.28  

10,001 - 100,000

   1,254     4.59     33,105     4.55     1,152     4.63     31,838     4.28  

100,001 - 1,000,000

   319     1.17     107,144     14.72     310     1.24     109,383     14.69  

Over 1,000,000

   85     0.31     554,001     76.11     93     0.37     573,884     77.08  
   27,330     100     727,897     100     24,903     100     744,525     100  

Major Shareholders

The Company is not owned or controlled directly or indirectly by any government or by any other corporation or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly. The major shareholders do not have differentany special voting rights. As at 31 December 2011,6 March 2015, the Company had received notification of the following interests in its Ordinary share capital:

 

    

31 December 2011

  

31 December 2010

  

31 December 2009

 
Name  

Holding/

Voting

Rights

   

% at

year

end

  

Holding/

Voting

Rights

   

% at

year

end

  Holding/
Voting
Rights
   

% at

year

end

 

BlackRock, Inc.*

   28,961,677     4.02  28,235,082     3.98  -     -  

Capital Group International

   -     -    -     -    20,863,228     2.98

Capital Research and Management

Company (CRMC)**

   69,367,916     9.64  77,242,667     10.89  34,997,266     5.01

The Growth Fund of America (GFA)**

   -     -    -     -    28,597,372     4.09

Harbor International Fund

   21,999,275     3.05  -     -    -     -  

Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway)

   21,543,277     2.99  21,707,149     3.06  -     -  

Templeton Global Advisors Limited*

   21,503,171     2.99  -     -    -     -  

UBS AG

   26,380,604     3.66  26,380,604     3.72  26,380,604     3.77
  

6 March 2015

 

  

31 December 2014

 

  

31 December 2013

 

  

31 December 2012

 

 
Name 

Holding/Voting

Rights

  

%

at period

end

  

Holding/Voting

Rights

  

%

at year

end

  

Holding/Voting

Rights

  

%

at year

end

  

Holding/Voting

Rights

  

%

at year

end

 
BlackRock, Inc.1  67,412,664    8.26    40,681,647    5.49    43,857,751    5.98    28,961,677    3.98  
The Capital Group Companies, Inc. (“CGC”)  -    -    -    -    -    -    35,763,581    4.92  
Harbor International Fund  21,853,816    2.68    21,999,275    2.96    21,999,275    3.00    21,999,275    3.02  
Legal & General Group Plc  -    -    -    -    -    -    22,496,003    3.09  
Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway)  -    -    -    -    -    -    21,543,277    2.96  
Templeton Global Advisors Limited  21,503,171    2.63    21,503,171    2.90    21,503,171    2.93    21,503,171    2.96  
UBS AG  26,380,604    3.23    26,380,604    3.56    26,380,604    3.59    26,380,604    3.63  

 

*1

BlackRock, Inc. and Templeton Global Advisors Limited havehas advised that theirits interests in CRH shares arise by reason of discretionary investment management arrangements entered into by themit or theirits subsidiaries.

 

LOGO

**In early 2010, CRMC advised the Company that, with effect from 1 January 2010, it had been granted proxy voting authority by various Capital Group funds, including GFA, which previously voted independently from CRMC.
CRH      197

On 22 March 2012, CRMC advised the Company that its holding of shares was 64,159,830 shares (8.91%). As of 23 March 2012, the Company has not been advised of any other changes in the holdings set out above.


LOGO

CRH    181


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

 

Shareholder Information|continued

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Persons

There were no purchases of equity securities by the issuer and/or affiliated persons during the course of 2011.2014.

Dividends

The Company has paid dividends on its Ordinary Shares in respect of each fiscal year since the formation of the Group in 1970. Dividends are paid to shareholders as of record dates, which are determined by the Board of Directors. An interim dividend is normally declared by the Board of Directors in August of each year and is generally paid in October. A final dividend is normally recommended by the Board of Directors following the end of the fiscal year to which it relates and, if approved by the shareholders at an Annual General Meeting, is generally paid in May of that year.

Each ordinary shareholder in CRH holds an Income Share which is tied to each Ordinary Share and may only be transferred or otherwise dealt with in conjunction with that Ordinary Share. The payment of future cash dividends will be dependent upon future earnings, the financial condition of the Group and other factors.

The following table sets forth the amounts of interim, final and total dividends in euro cent per Ordinary Share declared in respect of each fiscal year indicated. Each amount represents the actual dividend payable. Solely for the convenience of the reader, these dividends have been translated into US cents per American Depositary Share (“ADS”) (each representing one Ordinary Share) using the FRB Noon Buying Rate on the date of payment. The final dividend, if approved at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting of shareholders to be held on 97 May 2012,2015, will be paid on 1412 May 20122015 and will bring the full year dividend for 20112015 to 62.50 cent, with dividend cover of 1.3 times.cent. The proposed final dividend has been translated using the FRB Noon Buying Rate on 236 March 2012.2015.

 

  Euro cent      Translated into 
  

Euro cent per ordinary sharea

   

Translated into US cents per ADSa

   per ordinary share      US cents per ADS 
Years ended 31 December  Interim   Final Total   Interim   Final   Total   Interim   Final   Total   Interim   Final   Total 

2007

   18.03     43.28    61.31     26.11     66.69     92.80  

2008

   18.48     43.74    62.22     23.44     59.43     82.87  

2009

   18.50     44.00    62.50     27.46     58.79     86.25  

2010

   18.50     44.00    62.50     25.64     62.23     87.87         18.50         44.00         62.50           25.64         62.23         87.87  

2011

   18.50     44.00b   62.50     25.43     58.36     83.79     18.50     44.00     62.50       25.43     58.36     83.79  

2012

   18.50     44.00     62.50       24.09     57.18     81.27  

2013

   18.50     44.00     62.50       25.52     60.54     86.06  

2014

   18.50     44.00a     62.50       23.45     47.76a     71.21  

 

aDividend per share amounts for 2007 and 2008 have been adjusted for the bonus element of the March 2009 Rights Issue by applying a factor of 1.1090.
b

Proposed

Dividend Withholding Tax (DWT) must be deducted from dividends paid by an Irish resident company, unless a shareholder is entitled to an exemption and has submitted a properly completed exemption form to the Company’s Registrars, Capita Registrars (Ireland) Limited.Asset Services (the “Registrars”). DWT applies to dividends paid by way of cash or by way of shares under a scrip dividend scheme and is deducted at the standard rate of Income Tax (currently 20%). Non-resident shareholders and certain Irish companies, trusts, pension schemes, investment undertakings and charities may be entitled to claim exemption from DWT. Copies of the exemption form may be obtained from Capitathe Registrars. Shareholders should note that DWT will be deducted from dividends in cases where a properly completed exemption form has not been received by the record date for a dividend. Individuals who are resident in the Republic of Ireland for tax purposes are not entitled to an exemption.

182    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Shareholders who wish to have their dividend paid direct to a bank account, by electronic funds transfer, should complete the required dividend mandate form and submit it to the Registrars. A copy of the required form can be obtained from the shareholder services section of CRH website, www.crh.com, under “Equity Investors”. Alternatively, shareholders can contact Capitathe Registrars to obtain a mandate form.form (see contact details on page 207). Tax vouchers will be sent to the shareholder’s registered address under this arrangement.

Dividends are generally paid in euro. However, in order to avoid costs to shareholders, dividends are paid in Sterling and US Dollars to shareholders whose shares are not held in the CREST system (see page 199) and whose address, according to the Share Register, is in the United KingdomUK and the United States respectively, unless they require otherwise.

AsDividends in respect of 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are paid half-yearly on 5 April and 5 October.

Dividends in respect of 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are paid half-yearly on 15 April and 15 October.

Shareholders have the above arrangements can be inflexible for institutional shareholders, whereoption of taking their dividend in the form of shares under the Company’s Scrip Dividend Scheme.

198      CRH


Shareholder Information|continued

CREST

Transfer of the Company’s shares takes place through the CREST system. Shareholders have the choice of holding their shares in electronic form or in the form of share certificates.

Where shares are held in CREST, dividends are automatically paid in euro unless a currency election is made. CREST members should use the facility in CREST to make currency elections. Such elections must be made in respect of entire holdings as partial elections are not permissible.

Dividends in respect of 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are paid half-yearly on 5 April and 5 October.

Dividends in respect of 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are paid half-yearly on 15 April and 15 October.

CREST

Transfer of the Company’s shares takes place through the CREST system. Shareholders have the choice of holding their shares in electronic form or in the form of share certificates.

Share Plans

The Group operates share option schemes, performance share plans, share participation plansschemes and savings-related share option schemes (the “Schemes”) for eligible employees in all regions where the regulations permit the operation of such plans.schemes. A brief description of these plansthe Schemes is outlined below. Shares issued (whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares) in connection with the Schemes rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary and Income shares of the Company.

2000 Share Option Schemes

At the Annual General Meeting held on 3 May 2000, (the “Adoption Date”), shareholders approved the adoption of Share Option Schemes (the “2000 Share Option Schemes”) to replace schemes which were approved in May 1990. The 2000 Share Option Schemes were replaced by new schemes in May 2010 (see below).

There are two elements to the 2000 Share Option Schemes, a “basic tier” and a “second tier”.

Details of the performance criteria applicable to basic“basic tier” and second tier“second tier” options granted under the 2000 Share Option Schemes in the 10ten years following the Adoption Date are contained in the Report on Directors’ Remuneration Report in table 39 on page 96.119.

Options may be exercised not later than ten years from the date of grant of the option, and not earlier than the expiration of three years from the date of grant for the basic tier and five years for the second tier. Benefits under the schemes are not pensionable. Shares issued (whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares) in connection with exercises of options granted under the 2000 Share Option Schemes will rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary and Income shares of the Company.

2010 Share Option Schemes

At the Annual General Meeting held on 5 May 2010, shareholders approved the adoption of new share option schemes to replace the schemes which were approved in May 2000 (see above).

The Following the approval by shareholders of the 2014 Performance Share Plan (see below), no further awards will be granted under the 2010 Share Option Schemes (the “2010 Scheme”Schemes”). Consequently, the last award under the 2010 Schemes was made in 2013.

The 2010 Schemes are based on one tier of options with a single vesting test. The performance criteria for the 2010 SchemeSchemes are EPS-based. Vesting will only occur once an initial performance target has been reached and, thereafter, will be dependent on performance. In considering the level of vesting based on EPS performance, the Remuneration Committee will also consider the overall results of the Group. Please refer to the Report on Directors’ Remuneration Report in table 32 on pages 87 to 89page 116 in relation to the performance criteria for the 2010 Scheme.Schemes.

CRH    183


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Principal features

The Remuneration Committee overseesSubject to the operationachievement of the 2010 Scheme. No option canEPS performance criteria, options may be granted under the 2010 Scheme moreexercised not later than ten years after shareholders approve the scheme and no option can be exercised more than ten years afterfrom the date of grant except that where the tenth anniversary falls within a period in which a participant is in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, the latest exercise date shall be extended until 14 days after the expiry of such period.

The 2010 Scheme is available for executive directors and employees of any participating company nominated by the Remuneration Committee. A person cannot be granted an option within two years of his/her agreed retirement date (as defined in the rules of the 2010 Scheme).

Inoption, and not earlier than the tenexpiration of three years preceding any given day,from the aggregate numberdate of shares in the Company committed for issue under all share schemes operated by the Company shall not exceed 10% of the shares in issue immediately prior to that day. In the ten years preceding any given day, the aggregate number of shares in the Company committed for issuegrant. Benefits under the 2010 Scheme shall not exceed 5% of the shares in issue immediately prior to that day. A flow rate of 3% over three years will apply for all CRH share schemes in operation.

Option exercises may be satisfied by the allotment of shares, the reissue of Treasury Shares, or the purchase of shares on the market by a third party trustee. Shares issued or reissued under the 2010 Scheme will rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary and Income Shares of the Company.

Annual grants are limited to a maximum of 200% of the individual’s remuneration (salary, bonus and benefit-in-kind). This may be exceeded, up to a maximum of 25% of the individual limit, in cases of superior levels of business performance as determined by the Remuneration Committee and in cases where the Committee determines that it is necessary for the recruitment or retention of key employees. Awards under the 2010 Scheme are not pensionable.

The 2010 Scheme provides for a single tier of options with a single vesting test.

Generally options lapse when a participant leaves the Group. However, where cessation occurs by reason of death, ill-health, or agreed retirement age, the participant may be granted a period of 12 months to exercise options after the relevant event. If an option has not vested, the Remuneration Committee may, at its discretion, determine that the 12 month period shall commence on the date on which the option becomes first exercisable. In these circumstances, the Committee may also decide that the option should be scaled down by reference to the performance of the participant and on a time apportioned basis. Such pro-ration of an option will, in general, apply unless the Committee determines that the circumstances warrant greater vesting. The Committee may, at its discretion, waive the performance criteria of the 2010 Scheme in which case the award will be scaled down by reference to the performance of the participant and on a time apportioned basis. Where cessation occurs for any other reason, the participant may be granted a period of six months to exercise options. If an option has not vested, in cases of redundancy or where a subsidiary ceases to be under the control of the Company, the Remuneration Committee may, at its discretion, determine that the six month period shall commence on the date on which the option becomes first exercisable. In these circumstances, the Committee may also decide that the option should be scaled down by reference to the performance of the participant and on a time apportioned basis. Such pro-ration of an option will, in general, apply unless the Committee determines that the circumstances warrant greater vesting. The Committee may, at its discretion, waive the performance criteria of the Scheme in which case the award will be scaled down by reference to the performance of the participant and on a time apportioned basis.

There is no automatic vesting in the event of a takeover, reconstruction, amalgamation, de-merger, scheme of arrangement or the winding-up of the Company. However, the Remuneration Committee may, at its discretion, allow options to vest early in these circumstances in full or in part. Proration of an option will, in general, apply unless the Committee determines that the circumstances warrant greater vesting.

184    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

In the event of a de-merger, special dividend or similar event or an alteration to the capital structure of the Company, including a capitalisation of reserves or a rights issue, unexercised options may be adjusted as the Remuneration Committee deems appropriate. Before exercising this discretion, the Committee will consult with the auditors in relation to the proposed adjustments.

Provided the purpose of the 2010 Scheme is not altered, the Remuneration Committee shall have authority to amend the 2010 Scheme in any manner it deems fit, except that amendments to the provisions relating to eligibility for participation, the maximum annual entitlement for any one participant, the limitation on the number of shares to be issued under the 2010 Scheme and the adjustment of options would require the prior approval of shareholders.

2000 Savings-related Share Option Schemes

At the Annual General Meeting held on 3 May 2000, shareholders approved the adoption of savings-related share option schemes. CRH Group schemes were subsequently established in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom (the “2000 Savings-related Share Option Schemes”), under which eligible subsidiary companies of the Group were nominated as participating subsidiaries. No further options will be granted under the 2000 Savings-related Share Option Schemes as those schemes were replaced by new savings-related share option schemes in May 2010 (see below).

Shares issued* in connection with exercises of options granted under the 2000 Savings-Related Share Option Schemes will rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary and Income shares of the Company.

At 236 March 2012, 1,678,7312015, 2,158,570 Ordinary Shares have been issued*issued1 pursuant to the 2000 Savings-RelatedSavings-related Share Option Schemes.

2010 Savings-RelatedSavings-related Share Option Schemes

At the Annual General Meeting held on 5 May 2010, (the “Adoption Date”), shareholders approved the adoption of savings-related share option schemes. It is intendedschemes (the “2010 Savings-related Share Option Scheme”) to grant options in 2011 under CRH Group Schemes established inreplace the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom to nominated eligible subsidiary companies of the Group.

Principal features

Shares issued* under the 20102000 Savings-related Share Option Schemes will rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary and Income Shares of the Company.

Benefits under the scheme will not be pensionable.Schemes.

All employees of a participating subsidiary in the Republic of Ireland or United Kingdom, who have satisfied a required qualifying period, will beare invited to participate.participate in this scheme.

Eligible employees who wish to participate in the scheme will enter into a savings contract with a nominated savings institution, for a three or a five year period, to save a maximum of500 or Stg£250,Stg£500, as appropriate, per month.

1

Whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares.

LOGO

CRH      199


LOGO

Shareholder Information | continued

At the commencement of each contract period employees will beare granted an option to acquire Ordinary Shares in the Company at an option price which is equal to the amount proposed to be saved plus the bonus payable by the nominated savings institution at the end of the savings period. The price payable for each Ordinary Share under an option will be not less than the higher of par or 75% (or in the case of the U.K.UK scheme 80%) of the middle-market quotationmarket value of a share on the Stock Exchange atday the timeinvitation to apply for the option is granted.issued.

On completion of the savings contract, employees may use the amount saved, together with the bonus earned, to exercise the option.

*Whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares.

CRH    185


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

In the ten years preceding any given day, the aggregate number of shares in the Company committed for issue under all share schemes operated by the Company shall not exceed 10% of the shares in issue immediately prior to that day.

In the event of any variation to the capital structure or reserves of the Company, including a capitalisation of reserves, rights issue, sub-division, consolidation, reduction or otherwise, unexercised options may be adjusted, subject to consulting with the auditors in relation to the proposed amendment and receiving prior written approval from the relevant revenue authorities.

The provisions relating to eligibility, limitation on number of shares to be issued under the scheme, maximum entitlement for any one participant, the basis of individual entitlement or the adjustment of grants in the event of a variation in share capital may not be altered to the advantage of participants without the prior approval of shareholders, except for minor amendments to benefit the administration of the scheme, to take account of a change in legislation or to obtain or maintain favourable tax, exchange control or regulatory treatment for any Group company or any participant.

No139,239 Ordinary Shares have been issued*issued1 pursuant to the 2010 Savings-RelatedSavings-related Share Option Schemes to date.

Share Participation Schemes

At the Annual General Meeting on 13 May 1987, the shareholders approved the establishment of Share Participation Schemes for the Company, its subsidiaries and companies under its control. Directors and employees of the companies who have at least one year’s service may elect to participate in these Share Participation Schemes. At 236 March 2012, 7,166,4002015, 7,551,453 Ordinary Shares have been issued*issued1 pursuant to the Share Participation Schemes.

2006 Performance Share Plan

See the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 114 for more details. The 2006 Performance Share Plan (the “2006 PSP”) has been replaced by the 2014 Performance Share Plan (the “2014 PSP”, see below), which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual General Meeting. Consequently, the last award under the 2006 PSP was made in 2013.

2014 Performance Share Plan

The 2014 PSP was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting on 7 May 2014. It replaces the 2010 Share Option Schemes and the 2006 PSP. See the Directors’ Remuneration pages 86Report on page 112 for more details.

Restricted Share Plan

In 2013, the Board approved the adoption of the 2013 Restricted Share Plan (the “2013 RSP”). Under the rules of the 2013 RSP, certain senior executives (excluding executive Board Directors) received a conditional award of shares in 2013 on a time-vested basis. As (i) executive Directors were excluded from the award and 87.(ii) no shares were allotted or re-issued to satisfy the awards, the listing rules of the London and Irish Stock Exchanges did not require shareholder approval of the 2013 RSP.

During 2013, the Employee Benefit Trust purchased 391,250 shares on behalf of CRH plc in respect of awards under the 2013 RSP. No further awards will be made under the 2013 RSP.

American Depositary Shares

Fees and charges payable by a holder of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”)

The Depositary collects fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors or from intermediaries acting for them depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

 

1

Whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares.

200      CRH


Shareholder Information| continued

Persons depositing or withdrawing

shares must pay:

  For:

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)  

•   Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property

 

•   Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) (A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs)  

•   Distribution of deposited securities by the Depositary to ADS registered holders

186    CRH

*Whether by way of the allotment of new shares or the reissue of Treasury Shares.


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Persons depositing or withdrawing
shares must pay:
For:

Applicable Registration or transfer fees  

•   Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when the holder deposits or withdraws shares

Applicable Expenses of the Depositary

  

•   Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions

 

•   Converting foreign currency to US Dollars

Applicable Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes  

•   As necessary

Fees and direct and indirect payments made by the Depositary to the Company

The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, has agreed to reimburse certain Company expenses related to the Company’s ADS programme and incurred by the Company in connection with the ADS programme. For the year ended 31 December 20112014 the Depositary reimbursed to the Company, or paid amounts on its behalf to third parties, a total sum of $85,940.$175,192.

The table below sets forth the category of expense that the Depositary has agreed to reimburse the Company and the amounts reimbursed for the year ended 31 December 2011:2014:

Category of expense reimbursed to the Company  Amount reimbursed for the
year ended
31 December 2011
 

NYSE listing fees1

  $38,000  

Total

  $38,000  

 

1Reimbursement
Category of expense reimbursed to the Company

Amount reimbursed for $38,000 of the 2011

year ended

31 December 2014

NYSE listing fees was received from the Depositary on 17 March 2011.

$98,345

Investor relations expenses

$37,580

Total

$135,925

The table below sets forth the types of expenses that the Depositary has paid to third parties and the amounts reimbursed for the year ended 31 December 2011:2014:

Category of expense waived or paid directly to third parties  Amount reimbursed for the
year ended 31 December
2011
 
Printing, distribution and administration costs paid directly to Broadridge in connection with US shareholder communications and AGM related expenses in connection with the ADS program2  $47,940  

Total

  $47,940  

 

2
Category of expense waived or paid directly to third parties

Amount reimbursed for the

year ended

31 December 2014

Printing, distribution and administration costs paid directly to third parties in connection with US shareholder communications and AGM related expenses in connection with the ADS program1

$39,267

Total

$39,267

1

During 2011, $47,9402014, $39,267 was paid by the Depositary to Broadridge,third parties, relating to services provided in 2011. The Broadridge2014. These fees are SEC approved.

LOGO

CRH      201


LOGO

Shareholder Information| continued

The Depositary has also agreed to waive fees for standard costs associated with the administration of the ADS programprogramme and has paid certain expenses directly to third parties on behalf of the Company.

Under certain circumstances, including removal of the Depositary or termination of the ADS programprogramme by the Company before November 2012,2016, the Company is required to repay the Depositary, up to a maximum of $100,000,$250,000, the amounts waived, reimbursed and/or expenses paid by the Depositary to or on behalf of the Company.

CRH    187


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Taxation

The following summary outlines the material aspects of US federal income and Republic of Ireland tax law regarding the ownership and disposition of ADSs or Ordinary Shares. Because it is a summary, holders of ADSs or Ordinary Shares are advised to consult their tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of their ownership or disposition. This summary does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular holders (such as tax-exempt entities, certain insurance companies, broker-dealers, traders in securities that elect to mark-to-market, investors liable for alternative minimum tax, investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the stock of the Company (by vote or value), investors that hold Ordinary Shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction, investors that hold Ordinary Shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for tax purposes or investors whose functional currency is not the US Dollar), some of which may be subject to special rules. In addition, if a partnership holds the Ordinary Shares or ADSs, the US federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership and may not be described fully below. Holders of ADSs or Ordinary Shares are advised to consult their tax advisors with respect to US federal, state and local, Republic of Ireland and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of Ordinary Shares and ADSs in their particular circumstances, and in particular whether they are eligible for the benefits of the Income Tax Treaty (as defined below) in respect of their investment in the Ordinary Shares or ADSs.

The statements regarding US and Irish laws set forth below are based, in part, on representations of the Depositary and assume that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with their terms.

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed US Treasury regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and the laws of the Republic of Ireland all as currently in effect, as well as the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital Gains (the “Income Tax Treaty”). These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.

HoldersIn general, holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of Ordinary Shares represented thereby for the purposes of the Income Tax Treaty and for US federal income tax purposes. Exchanges of Ordinary Shares for ADSs, and ADSs for Ordinary Shares, generally will not be subject to US federal income or Irish tax.

As used herein, the term “US holder” means a beneficial owner of an ADS or Ordinary Share who (i) is a US citizen or resident, a US corporation, an estate whose income is subject to US federal income tax regardless of its source, or a trust if a US court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more US persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust, and (ii) is not a resident of, or ordinarily resident in, the Republic of Ireland for purposes of Irish taxes.

Taxation of Dividends paid to US Holders

Under general Irish tax law, US holders are not liable for Irish tax on dividends received from the Company. On the payment of dividends, the Company is obliged to withhold a Dividend Withholding Tax (“DWT”). The statutory rate at present is 20% of the dividend payable. Dividends paid by the Company to a US tax resident individual will be exempt from DWT, provided the following conditions are met:

 

1.the individual (who must be the beneficial owner) is resident for tax purposes in the US (or any country with which Ireland has a double tax treaty) and neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland; and

 

2.the individual signs a declaration to the Company, which states that he/she is a US tax resident individual at the time of making the declaration and that he/she will notify the Company in writing when he/she no longer meets the condition in (1) above; or

 

3.the individual provides the Company with a certificate of tax residency from the US tax authorities.

Dividends paid by the Company to a US tax resident company (which must be the beneficial owner) will be exempt from DWT, provided the following conditions are met:

202      CRH


Shareholder Information| continued

 

1.the recipient company is resident for tax purposes in the US (or any country with which Ireland has a double tax treaty) and not under the control, either directly or indirectly, of Irish resident persons; and

 

2.the recipient company is not tax resident in Ireland; and

 

3.the recipient company provides a declaration to the Company, which states that it is entitled to an exemption from DWT, on the basis that it meets the condition in (1) above at the time of making the declaration, and that it will notify the Company when it no longer meets the condition in (1) above.

188    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

For US federal income tax purposes, and subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules discussed below, US holders will include in gross income the gross amount of any dividend paid by the Company out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes) as ordinary income when the dividend is actually or constructively received by the US holder, in the case of Ordinary Shares, or by the Depositary, in the case of ADSs. Any Irish tax withheld from this dividend payment must be included in this gross amount even though the amount withheld is not in fact received. Dividends paid to non-corporate US holders in taxable years beginning before 1 January 2013 that constitute qualified dividend income will be subjecttaxed at the preferential rates applicable to a maximum tax rate of 15%long-term capital gains provided certain holding period requirements are met. Dividends the Company pays with respect to Ordinary Shares or ADSs generally will be qualified dividend income. Dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-receiveddividends received deduction generally allowed to US corporations in respect of dividends received from other US corporations.

The amount of the dividend distribution includable in income of a US holder will be the US Dollar value of the euro payments made, determined at the spot euro/US Dollar rate on the date such dividend distribution is includable in the income of the US holder, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted to US Dollars. Generally any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend payment is includable in income to the date such payment is converted into US Dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. Such gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the US for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for US federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the US holder’s basis in the Ordinary Shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. However, the Company does not calculate earnings and profits in accordance with US federal income tax principles. Accordingly, US holders should expect to generally treat distributions the Company makes as dividends.

For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, dividends the Company pays with respect to Ordinary Shares or ADSs will be income from sources outside the US, and will, depending on your circumstances, be either “passive” or “general” income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to a US holder. Any Irish tax withheld from distributions will not be eligible for a foreign tax credit to the extent an exemption from the tax withheld is available to the US Holder.holder.

Capital Gains Tax

A US holder will not be liable for Irish tax on gains realised on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Ordinary Shares unless the ADSs or Ordinary Shares are held in connection with a trade or business carried on by such holder in the Republic of Ireland through a branch or agency. A US holder will be liable for US federal income tax on such gains in the same manner as gains from a sale or other disposition of any other shares in a company. Subject to the PFIC rules below, US holders who sell or otherwise dispose of Ordinary Shares or ADSs will recognise capital gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the US Dollar value of the amount realised on the sale or disposition and the tax basis, determined in US Dollars, in the Ordinary Shares or ADSs. Capital gains of a non-corporate US holder are generally taxed at a preferential rate where the holder has a holding period greater than one year, and the capital gain or loss will generally be US source for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Capital Acquisitions Tax (Estate/Gift Tax)

Although non-residents may hold Ordinary Shares, the shares are deemed to be situated in the Republic of Ireland, because the Company is required to maintain its Share Register in the Republic of Ireland for Irish Capital Gains Tax purposes. Accordingly, holders of Ordinary Shares may be subject to Irish gift or inheritance tax, notwithstanding that the parties involved are domiciled and resident outside the Republic of Ireland. Certain exemptions apply to gifts and inheritances depending on the relationship between the donor and donee.

Under the Ireland-US Estate Tax Treaty with respect to taxes on the estates of deceased persons, credit against US federal estate tax is available in respect of any Irish inheritance tax payable in respect of transfers of Ordinary Shares.

 

CRH    189LOGO

CRH      203


Shareholder InformationLOGO

 

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONShareholder Information| continued

Additional Federal US Income Tax Considerations

The Company believes that Ordinary Shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for US federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If the Company is treated as a PFIC and you are a US holder that did not make a mark-to-market election, you will be subject to special rules with respect to any gain you realise on the sale or other disposition of your Ordinary Shares or ADSs and any excess distribution that the Company makes to you. Generally, any such gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over your holding period for the Ordinary Shares or ADSs, the amount allocated to the taxable year in which you realised the gain or received the excess distribution will be taxed as ordinary income, the amount allocated to each prior year will be generally taxed as ordinary income at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year, and an interest charge will be applied to any tax attributable to such gain or excess distribution for the prior years. With certain exceptions, Ordinary Shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if the company was a PFIC at any time during the investor’s holding period in the Ordinary Shares or ADSs. In addition, dividends that you receive from the Company will not constitute qualified dividend income to you if the Company is deemed to be a PFIC either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

Stamp Duty

Section 90 Stamp Duties Consolidation Act 1999 exempts from Irish stamp duty transfers of ADSs where the ADSs are dealt in and quoted on a recognised stock exchange in the US and the underlying deposited securities are dealt in and quoted on a recognised stock exchange. The Irish tax authorities regard NASDAQ and the NYSE as recognised stock exchanges. Irish stamp duty will be charged at the rate of 1% of the amount or value of the consideration on any conveyance or transfer on sale of Ordinary Shares (exemption generally available in the case of single transfers with a value of less than1,000).

Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Company’s Memorandum of Association sets out the objects and powers of the Company. The Articles of Association detail the rights attaching to each share class; the method by which the Company’s shares can be purchased or reissued; the provisions which apply to the holding of and voting at general meetings; and the rules relating to the Directors, including their appointment, retirement, re-election, duties and powers.

A copy of the current Memorandum and Articles of Association can be obtained from the Group’s website,www.crh.com. www.crh.com.

The following summarises certain provisions of CRH’s Memorandum and Articles of Association and applicable Irish law.

Objects and Purposes

CRH is incorporated under the name CRH public limited company and is registered in Ireland with registered number 12965. Clause 4 of CRH’s memorandumMemorandum of associationAssociation provides that its objects include the business of quarry masters and proprietors, lessees and workers of quarries, sand and gravel pits, mines and the like generally; the business of road-makers and contractors, building contractors, builders merchants and providers and dealers in road making and building materials, timber merchants; and the carrying on of any other business calculated to benefit CRH. The memorandum grants CRH a range of corporate capabilities to effect these objects.

Directors

The Directors manage the business and affairs of CRH.

Directors who are in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in contracts or other arrangements with CRH must declare the nature of their interest at a meeting of the Directors, and, subject to certain

190    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

exemptions, may not vote in respect of any contract or arrangement or other proposal whatsoever in which they have any material interest other than by virtue of their interest in shares or debentures in the Company. However, in the absence of some other material interest not indicated below, a Director is entitled to vote and to be counted in a quorum for the purpose of any vote relating to a resolution concerning the following matters:

 

the giving of security or indemnity with respect to money lent or obligations taken by the Director at the request or for the benefit of the Company;

 

the giving of security or indemnity to a third party with respect to a debt or obligation of the Company which the Director has assumed responsibility for under a guarantee, indemnity or the giving of security;

 

any proposal under which the Director is interested concerning the underwriting of Company shares, debentures or other securities;

 

204      CRH


Shareholder Information| continued

any other proposal concerning any other company in which the Director is interested, directly or indirectly (whether as an officer, shareholder or otherwise) provided that the Director is not the holder of 1% or more of the voting interest in the shares of such company; and

 

proposals concerning the modification of certain retirement benefits under which the Director may benefit and which have been approved or are subject to approval by the Irish Revenue Commissioners.

The Directors may exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money, except that such general power is restricted to the aggregate amount of principal borrowed less cash balances of the Company and its subsidiaries not exceeding an amount twice the aggregate of (a) the share capital of the Company; and (b) the amount standing to the credit of retained income, foreign currency translation reserve and other reserves, capital grants, deferred taxation and non-controlling interest; less any repayable Governmentgovernment grants; less (c) the aggregate amount of Treasury Shares and own shares held by the Company.

The Company in general meeting from time to time determines the fees payable to the Directors. The CRH Board may grant special remuneration to any of its number who being called upon, shall render any special or extra services to the Company or go or reside abroad in connection with the conduct of any of the affairs of the Company.

The qualification of a Director is the holding alone and not jointly with any other person of 1,000 Ordinary Shares in the capital of the Company.

No person may be appointed a Director of the Company who has attained the age of sixty-five years and a Director shall vacate office at the next Annual General Meeting after they attain the age of sixty-eight years; however, a person may be appointed as a Director after attaining the age of sixty-five years and a Director may continue in office and will not be required to retire upon attaining the age of sixty-eight years if the continuance as a Director is approved by a Resolution of the Directors. At the upcoming Annual General Meeting, the approval of shareholders will be sought to delete this provision; see 2012 changes below.

Voting rightsRights

The Articles provide that, at shareholders’ meetings, holders of Ordinary Shares, either in person or by proxy, are entitled on a show of hands to one vote and on a poll to one vote per share. No member is entitled to vote at any general meeting unless all calls or other sums immediately payable in respect of their shares in the Company have been paid.

Laws, Decrees or other Regulations

There are no restrictions under the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company or under Irish law that limit the right of non-Irish residents or foreign owners freely to hold their Ordinary Shares or to vote their Ordinary Shares.

CRH    191


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Liquidation Rights/Return of Capital

In the event of the Company being wound-up, the liquidator may, with the sanction of a shareholders’ special resolution, divide among the holders of the Ordinary Shares the whole or any part of the net assets of the Company (after the return of capital and payment of accrued dividends on the preference shares) in cash or in kind, and may set such values as he deems fair upon any property to be so divided and determine how such division will be carried out. The liquidator may, with a like sanction, vest such assets in trust as he thinks fit, but no shareholders will be compelled to accept any shares or other assets upon which there is any liability.

Variation in Class Rights

Subject to the provisions of the Irish Companies Acts, the rights attached to any class of shares may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of not less than three-fourths in nominal value of the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate general meeting of the holders of those shares.

Disclosure of Shareholders’ Interests

A shareholder may lose the right to vote by not complying with any statutory notice or notice pursuant to Article 14 of the Articles of Association given by the Company requiring an indication in writing of: (a) the capacity in which the shares are held or any interest therein; (b) the persons who have an interest in the shares and the nature of their interest; or (c) whether any of the voting rights carried by such shares are the subject of any agreement or arrangement under which another person is entitled to control the shareholder’s exercise of these rights.

Issue of Shares

Subject to the provisions of the Irish Companies Acts and the Articles of Association, the issue of shares is at the discretion of the Directors.

Dividends

Shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare final dividends and the Directors may declare interim dividends but no final dividend may be declared in excess of the amount recommended by the Directors and no dividend may be paid otherwise than out of income available for that purpose in accordance with the Irish Companies Acts. There is provision to offer scrip dividends in lieu of cash. The preference shares rank for fixed rate dividends in priority to the Ordinary and Income Shares for the time being of the

LOGO

CRH      205


LOGO

Shareholder Information| continued

Company. Any dividend which has remained unclaimed for twelve years from the date of its declaration shall, if the Directors so decide, be forfeited and cease to remain owing by the Company.

Meetings

Shareholder meetings may be convened by majority vote of the Directors or requisitioned by shareholders holding not less than 5% of the voting rights of the Company. A quorum for a general meeting of the Company is constituted by five or more shareholders present in person and entitled to vote. The passing of resolutions at a meeting of the Company, other than special resolutions, requires a simple majority. A special resolution, in respect of which not less than 21 days’ notice in writing must be given, requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

5% Cumulative Preference Shares

The holdersDetails of the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are entitled to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend at a rate of 5% per annum and priority in a winding-up to repayment of capital, but have no further right to participate in profits or assets and are not entitled to be present or vote at general meetings unless their dividend is six months in arrears or a resolution is proposed for the winding-up of the Company or otherwise affecting their rights and privileges. Dividends on the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares are payable half yearly on 15 April and 15 October in each year.

192    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares

The holders of the 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are entitled to a fixed cumulative preference dividend at a rate of 7% per annum, and prioritydisclosed in a winding-up to repayment of capital, both subjectnote 28 to the rights of the holders of the 5% Cumulative Preference Shares but have no further right to participate in profits or assets and are not entitled to be present or vote at general meetings unless their dividend is six months in arrears or a resolution is proposed for, among others, the winding-up of the Company, the reduction of the capital of the Company or the abrogation of any special rights or privileges of any preference shares. Dividends on the 7% ‘A’ Cumulative Preference Shares are payable half yearly on 5 April and 5 October in each year.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Use of electronic communicationElectronic Communication

Whenever the Company, a Director, the Secretary, a member or any officer or person is required or permitted by the Articles of Association to give information in writing, such information may be given by electronic means or in electronic form, whether as electronic communication or otherwise, provided that the electronic means or electronic form has been approved of by the Directors.

20122015 Changes

At the Annual General Meeting to be held on 97 May 2012,2015, the approval of shareholders will be sought for proposed changes to the Memorandum and Articles of Association, which will become effective on commencement of the Companies Act 2014 (currently expected to be 1 June 2015), as follows:

Resolution 914 to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting is a special resolution and seeks shareholders’shareholder approval for certain changes to the ArticlesMemorandum of Association. The proposed amendments, if approved, will update the statutory references in the Memorandum of Association followingin order to be consistent with the Company’s recent listing changes and changes to Irish Company Law relating to the purchase of own shares. The proposed changes, if approved, will:Companies Act 2014.

(i)update Article 8A to enable the Company to purchase its own shares on the London Stock Exchange, which is now a prescribed Stock Exchange for the purpose of Section 212 of the Companies Act 1990. The Directors do not have any current intention of exercising the power to purchase the Company’s own shares and will only do so if they consider it to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders;

(ii)update Article 8B so that the minimum and maximum prices at which Treasury Shares may be re-issued can also be calculated in Sterling (GB) pence by reference to trading on the London Stock Exchange. Currently, these prices can only be calculated in euro by reference to trading on the Irish Stock Exchange;

(iii)provide the Directors with the flexibility, if they determine that it is appropriate, to set the price for scrip shares, issued in lieu of cash dividends, in Sterling (GB) pence by reference to trading on the London Stock Exchange. However, as dividends are paid in euro, it is envisaged that the Directors will continue to set the price in euro by reference to trading on the Irish Stock Exchange. The proposed amendment will also provide a standard formula for calculating the price of scrip shares on both Exchanges;

(iv)update Article 145 to reflect the broader requirements to make the Company’s annual report available than is covered by the wording of the existing Article.

Resolution 1015 to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting is a special resolution and seeks shareholders’shareholder approval for certain changes to remove the provisions in the Articles of Association which set an age limit for Directors. Under Article 91, no person can be appointed as a Director if they have reached age 65 and the office of Director must be vacated on reaching age 68, unless the Directors pass a resolution to waive these requirements.Association. The amendment,proposed changes, if approved, will remove a restriction that applies solely to a person’s age and reflect the fact that, in accordance with modern governance practice, all Directors go forward for re-election at each Annual General Meeting.will:

 

CRH    193


Shareholder Information

(i)

update Article 1 to disapply the optional sections of the Companies Act 2014, many of which deal with matters already specified in the Company’s Articles of Association;

 

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
(ii)

update all references to sections in the existing Companies Acts to their equivalent provision in the Companies Act 2014; and

 

Financial calendar
(iii)

insert a new Article 96(d), which requires directors to seek approval of the Board before making a commitment which could require them to restrict their independent judgement and permits these types of arrangements where they have been approved by the Board or pursuant to an authority delegated by the Board.

 

Financial Calendar

Announcement of final results for 2011

2014
   2826 February 20122015  

Ex-dividend date

   75 March 20122015  

Record date for dividend

   96 March 20122015  

Extraordinary General Meeting19 March 2015

Latest date for receipt of scrip forms

   2624 April 20122015  

Interim Management Statement

   96 May 20122015  

Annual General Meeting

   97 May 20122015

 
Dividend payment date and first day of dealing in scrip dividend shares   1412 May 20122015  

Announcement of interim results for 2012

2015
   1427 August 20122015  

Interim Management Statement

   1319 November 20122015

 

Electronic communicationsCommunications

Following the introduction of the 2007 Transparency Regulations, and in order to adopt a more environmentally friendly and cost effective approach, the Company provides the Annual Report to

206      CRH


Shareholder Information| continued

shareholders electronically via the CRH website,www.crh.com,, and only sends a printed copy to those shareholders who specifically request a copy. Shareholders who choose to do so can receive other shareholder communications, for example, notices of general meetings and shareholder circulars, electronically. However, shareholders will continue to receive printed proxy forms, dividend documentation and, if the Company deems it appropriate, other documentation by post. Shareholders can alter the method by which they receive communications by contacting Capitathe Registrars.

Electronic proxy votingProxy Voting

Shareholders may lodge a proxy form for the 20122015 Annual General Meeting electronically. Shareholders who wish to submit proxies via the internet may do soelectronically by accessing Capitathe Registrars’ website as described below.

CREST members wishing to appoint a proxy via CREST should refer to the CREST Manual and the notes to the Notice of the Annual General Meeting.

Registrars

Enquiries concerning shareholdings should be addressed to:to the Registrars:

Capita RegistrarsAsset Services

P.O. Box 7117

Dublin 2

Ireland.Ireland

Telephone: +353 (0) 1 810 2400553 0050

Fax: +353 (0) 1 810 2422224 0700

Website: www.capitaassetservices.com

Shareholders with access to the internet may check their accounts by accessing Capitathe Registrars’ websitewww.capitaregistrars.ie and selecting the Shareholder Portal.“Shareholder Portal (Ireland)”. This facility allows shareholders to check their shareholdings and dividend payments, register e-mail addresses, submitappoint proxies electronically and download standard forms required to initiate changes in details held by Capitathe Registrars. Shareholders will need to register for a User ID before using some of the services.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

The Group’s website contains answers to questions frequently asked by shareholders, including questions regarding shareholdings, dividenddividends payments, electronic communications and shareholder rights. The FAQsFAQ can be accessed in the Investors section of the website under “Equity Investors”.

194    CRH


Shareholder Information

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Exchange Controls

Certain aspects of CRH’s international monetary operations outside the EU were, prior to 31 December 1992, subject to regulation by the Central Bank of Ireland. These controls have now ceased. There are currently no Irish foreign exchange controls, or other statute or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, that affect the remittance of dividends, other than dividend withholding tax on the Ordinary Shares, or that affect the conduct of the Company’s operations.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Details of auditors’ fees are set out in note 43 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For details on the audit and non-audit services pre-approval policy see “CorporateCorporate Governance – Audit Committee”External Auditors on page 78.100.

Documents on Display

It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, which have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges. The SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and, for most recent CRH periodic filings only, at the Internet World Wide Web site maintained by the SEC atwww.sec.gov. www.sec.gov.

 

CRH    195LOGO

CRH      207


Exhibits

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

 

1.Memorandum and Articles of Association*.Association.*

2.1Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated 28 November 2006, between CRH plc and The Bank of New York Mellon*Mellon.*.*

7.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

8.Listing of principal subsidiary joint ventureundertakings and associated undertakings.equity accounted investments.

12.Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002.

13.Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002*2002.**.*

15.Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

99.1Disclosure of Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) Safety Data.

 

*

Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 20102012 that was filed by the Company on 3127 March 2011.2013.

 

**

Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2006 that was filed by the Company on 3 May 2007.

 

***

Furnished but not filed.

 

196    CRH         208


Signatures

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

 

CRH public limited company

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ M. Carton

Maeve Carton
Finance Director

Dated: 12 March 2015

CRH public limited company
(Registrant)
By:  /s/    M. Carton      
Maeve Carton
Finance Director

Dated: 28 March 2012

CRH    197