As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2016April 30, 2020

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM20-F

 

 

 

¨

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBERFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152019

OR

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

¨

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number:001-15256

 

 

OIOi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

N/A The Federative Republic of Brazil
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

Rua Humberto de Campos, 425

Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil22430-190

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Flavio Nicolay GuimarãesCamille Loyo Faria

Investor Relations Officer

Rua Humberto de Campos, 425

8º andar

Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil22430-190

Tel: +55 21 3131-2918

invest@oi.net.br

(Name, Telephone,E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol

  

Name of Each Exchange on which Registered

Common Shares, without par value, each represented by American Depositary Shares  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Shares, without par value, each represented by American Depositary SharesOIBR.C  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NonePreferred Shares, without par value, each represented by American Depositary Shares

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

The total number of issued and outstanding shares of each class of stock of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization as of December 31, 20152019 was:

519,751,6585,764,447,760 common shares, without par value

155,915,486155,727,241 preferred shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes ¨    No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes ¨    No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨    No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or anon-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ☒    Accelerated¨filer  ☐    Non-accelerated Accelerated filer  x                Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Emerging growth company  ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP  x

 

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

by the International Accounting Standards Board  ¨

 

Other  ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.    ¨ Item 17    ¨ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨    No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes ☒    No ☐

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page 

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

ii

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

v

PART I

   1 

Item 1.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TOFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
  6
PART I7

Item  1.   Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

   17 

Item 2.

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

   17 

Item 3.

Key Information

   17 

Item 4.

Information on the Company

   3228 

Item 4A.

Unresolved Staff Comments

   9269 

Item  5.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

   9370 

Item  6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

   140112 

Item  7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

   157126 

Item 8.

Financial Information

   164131 

Item 9.

The Offer and Listing

   174140 

Item 10.

Additional Information

   182143 

Item  11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   205169 

Item  12.

Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

   206170
PART II171 

PART II

208

Item  13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

   208171 

Item  14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

   208171 

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures

   208171 

Item 16A.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

   209172 

Item 16B.

Code of Ethics

   209172 

Item 16C.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   209173 

Item  16D.

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

   210173 

Item  16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

   211173 

Item  16F.

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

   211174 

Item 16G.

Corporate Governance

   211174 

Item 16H.

Mine Safety Disclosure

   213176
PART III177 

PART III

214

Item 17.

Financial Statements

   214177 

Item 18.

Financial Statements

   214177 

Item 19.

Exhibits

   214177 

SIGNATURES

  179

 

i


PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

All references herein to “real,” “reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilianreal, the official currency of Brazil. All references to “U.S. dollars,” “dollars” or “US$” are to U.S. dollars.

Financial Statements

We maintain our books and records inreais. Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes thereto, which we refer to as our audited consolidated financial statements, are included in this annual report.

We have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or the IASB, under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been audited in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, standards.

The RJ Proceedings are aimed at ensuring the continuation of our company as a going concern. This continuity was strengthened with the approval of the RJ Plan and, as a result, the borrowings and financing were novated and the related balances were recalculated under the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. The continuity of our company as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful outcome of the RJ Proceedings and the realization of other forecasts of our company.

Our company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the success of the RJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,797 million, loss for the year then ended was R$9,095 million, and working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities) totaled R$6,157 million. As at December 31, 2018 and after the recognition of the effects of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$22,896 million, profit for the year then ended was R$24,616 million, and working capital totaled R$10,624 million.

Since December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2, referred to as“COVID-19”) has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been able to quantify any material impacts related toCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our operations and sales, particularly ourfiber-to-the-home network expansion. For more details see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we included financial statements prepared under IFRS as part of our annual report on Form20-F, applying IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Reporting Standards,” considering that our previous primary GAAP was Brazilian GAAP and that January 1, 2009 was the date of transition to IFRS. Consequently, as we are not an IFRS first-time adopter, we have included a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative balance sheet (i.e., as of December 31, 2018) and comparative income statement periods preceding the most recent fiscal year (i.e., for the year ended December 31, 2018) in our audited consolidated financial statements to present the changes in the basis of presentation.

We are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP, which are based on:

the Brazilian Corporate Law (as defined below);

the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), or the CVM, and the Brazilian Federal Accounting Council (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade); and

the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis).

Certain Defined Terms

General

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” or similar terms are to Oi and its consolidated subsidiaries;

“ADSs” are to Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs;

“Africatel” are to Africatel Holdings B.V., an indirect subsidiary of Oi of which Oi’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Africatel GmbH & Co KG, holds 86% of the equity stock;

“ANATEL” are to the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações);

“Bratel” are to Bratel S.à r.l.;

“Brazil” are to the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Brazilian Corporate Law” are to, collectively, Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76, as amended;

“Brazilian government” are to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Common ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing five Common Shares;

“Common Shares” are to common shares of Oi;

“Copart 4” are to Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Telemar in January 2019;

“Copart 5” are to Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Oi in March 2019;

“Oi” are to Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization;

“Oi Coop” are to Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Oi Mobile” are to Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Pharol” are to Pharol, SGPS, S.A. (formerly known as Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.);

“Preferred ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing one Preferred Share;

“Preferred Shares” are to preferred shares of Oi;

“PTIF” are to Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi, which PT Portugal transferred to us in anticipation of our sale of PT Portugal in 2015;

“PT Portugal” are to PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., which we acquired on May 13,5, 2014 and sold on June 2, 2015;

“Telemar” are to Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“TmarPart” are to Telemar Participações S.A., which, prior to the capital increase of Oi on May 5, 2014, was the direct controlling shareholder of Oi and which merged with and into Oi on September 1, 2015; and

“TNL” are to Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., a company that was directly controlled by TmarPart prior to its merger with and into Oi on February 27, 2012.

Judicial Reorganization

The following defined terms relate to our global judicial reorganization. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.” Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“ADWs” are to American Depositary Warrants;

“Brazilian Bankruptcy Law” are to Brazilian Law No. 11,101 of June 9, 2005;

“Brazilian Confirmation Date” are to February 5, 2018, the date in which the Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Diário Oficial do Estado do Rio de Janeiro);

“Brazilian Confirmation Order” are to the order entered by the RJ Court on January 8, 2018, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan;

“Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase” are to the capital increase of R$10,600,097,221.00 through the issuance of 1,514,299,603 newly issued Common Shares and 116,480,467 Warrants, paid for by conversion of claims of holders of beneficial interests in the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF that individualized their unsecured claims evidenced by bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF in accordance with the procedures established in the RJ Plan and by the RJ Court with unsecured claims greater than US$750,000.00 (or the equivalent in other currencies) into Common Shares of Oi, pursuant to Section 4.3.3.5 of the RJ Plan;

“Default Recovery” are to the general treatment provided for unsecured credits under the RJ Plan;

“Defaulted Bonds” are to the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF that were outstanding on the date of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings;

“GCM” are to a General Creditors’ Meeting of creditors of our company recognized by the RJ Court. A GCM was held on December 19 and 20, 2017 to consider and vote on the RJ Plan;

“RJ Court” are to the 7th Commercial Court of the Judicial District of the State Capital of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The RJ Court is adjudicating the judicial reorganization proceedings in Brazil involving the RJ Debtors;

“RJ Debtors” are to Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, PTIF, Copart 4 and Copart 5;

“RJ Plan” are to the judicial reorganization plan, as amended, of the RJ Debtors that was filed with the RJ Court and, on December 20, 2017, approved by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at the GCM held on December 19 and 20, 2017;

“RJ Proceedings” are to the Brazilian proceedings for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) involving the RJ Debtors that are being adjudicated by the RJ Court, pursuant to a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law filed by the RJ Debtors with the RJ Court initially on June 20, 2016. On June 29, 2016, the RJ Court granted the processing of the RJ Proceedings of the RJ Debtors; and

“Warrants” are to warrants (bonus de subscrição) to acquire newly issued Common Shares of Oi, which Warrants may distributed in the form of American Depository Warrants, as further described in Section 4.3.3.6 of the RJ Plan.

Financial Restructuring

In June 2016, after considering the challenges arising from our economic and financial situation in connection with the maturity schedule of our financial debts, the threats to our cash flows represented by imminent attachments or freezing of assets in judicial lawsuits, and the urgent need to adopt measures that protect our company, we concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to preserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to our customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalents.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the RJ Plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the RJ Plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is binding on all parties as long as its effects are not stayed. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims have received the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. For more information regarding the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

During 2018, the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan was concluded.

In January 2019, we completed a preemptive offering of Common Shares as contemplated by Section 6 of the RJ Plan under which we issued and sold 3,225,806,451 Common Shares for an aggregate purchase price of R$4,000 million.

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and remain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by Escritório de Advocacia Arnoldo Wald e Advogados Associados, the judicial administrator of the RJ Debtors, or the Judicial Administrator, must take place within 60 days from the date of submission of the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of our mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the specific terms of the proposed amendment that will be presented to the RJ Court.

Market Share and Other Information

We make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to the telecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained from third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as information and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such information.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our business operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the Brazilian government’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

the cost and availability of financing;

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our services;

our ability to implement our corporate strategies in order to expand our customer base and increase our average revenue per user;

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of thereal,interest rates fluctuation and the political environment in Brazil;

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, on our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of our customers to pay for services on a timely basis;

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior; and

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not rely on these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report. We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 
   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

    

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315  (16,179  (15,669
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821   5,881   8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548  (3,853  (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782  (2,739  (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469  (4,557  (3,243
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977  (5,268  (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110  26,609   (3,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087  21,341   (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8  3,275   (1,099
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling shareholders

   (95  24   (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

   (8,765  22,036   (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   (236  2,555   (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   (7.57  81.94   (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915   155,915 

(1)

Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

   As of December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   17,797    22,896    (13,513

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this annual report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, the market price of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes to these regulations have and may continue to adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, these modifications and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or the PGMU, the Quality Management Regulations (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade), or the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMU and the RGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

We cannot assure you that any future amendments to our concession agreements will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concessions, we may be able to participate in competitive auctions for new concessions that the Brazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions, and we may not be able to secure new concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions or such concessions may be on less favorable terms than our current concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL published Resolution No. 700/2018, a regulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that makes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding the technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We expect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, ANATEL is expected to conduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides and preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the systems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our controls, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or that these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, our operating network and information systems could be compromised, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our debt instruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financing of R$31,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our consolidated indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these debt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to:

incur or guarantee additional debt;

grant liens over or pledge assets;

sell or dispose of assets;

merge or consolidate with another company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

These covenants could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our operational or capital needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2019, we were in full compliance with our financial covenants under our financial instruments.

In addition, the failure of Oi and our restricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on those debt agreements.

Furthermore, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses in the instruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness.

Under the RJ Plan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to apply an amount equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from our sale of assets in excess of US$200 million to investments in our activities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on an annual basis an amount equivalent to 70% of the amount by which (1) our cash and cash equivalents and financial investments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our operating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to adjustment in the event that we conclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This debt may be denominated inreais or in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this new debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial expenses and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties, although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims are entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified and, as a result, the RJ Debtors are declared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the debtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, or (2) seek to have the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by the RJ Court.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2019, we had provisioned R$5,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2019, we had claims against us of R$28,416 million in tax proceedings, R$798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions. We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal disposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi capital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and (2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the share purchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal disposition, we agreed to indemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our representations and warranties under the share purchase agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to credit risks with respect to our customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$489 million, or 2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$774 million.

ANATEL regulations allow us to implement certain policies to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our company with certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to these agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our company.

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (OperaçãoMapa da Mina). One of the main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the investigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in exchange for benefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our business with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officers or members of our board of directors were involved in our historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We cannot predict when the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be completed or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the outcome or impact of any resulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our public reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offeringfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. ThePay-TV market in Brazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in the cord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), or 3G, and our Long Term Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. Our competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use of OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information about specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

efficiently allocating our capital;

increasing marketing activities;

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

continuous attention to service quality; and

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises that restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in the process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions where we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain essential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other essential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such essential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where essential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

the imposition of customs or other duties on essential equipment that is imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, certain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded R$633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the commitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market prices of our Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Oi is a Brazilian corporation, and substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, among other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, especially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, including:

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

economic, political or social instability;

fluctuating exchange rates;

inflation;

interest rates and monetary policies;

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

energy policy;

exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes to the policies, regulations or standards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Ongoing political instability has adversely affected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The Brazilian economy has been affected by political events in Brazil, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the public in general, adversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and heightening the volatility of securities issued by Brazilian companies.

Brazilian markets have also experienced heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing investigations conducted by the Brazilian Federal Police and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies, have been convicted of political corruption related to bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery schemes. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict whether the ongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to heightened economic and political volatility in Brazil, nor whether new investigations against politicians and/or officers of private companies will occur in the future.

In addition, in October 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the total number of senators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office at the beginning of 2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on January 1, 2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as well as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of Brazilian securities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil has the power to determine policies and issue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy that affect the operations and financial performance of companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies the newly elected president will adopt or if these policies or changes in current policies may have an adverse effect on us or the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.

Since 1999, exchange rates for thereal have been set by the market, i.e., a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate forbetween thereal, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal has experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated against the U.S. dollar by 47.1% during 2015. During 2016, thereal appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 16.5% and thereal depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018, and 4.0% in 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, R$18,294 million, or 57.8%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$9,521 million, or 52.2%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated PIK Toggle Notes and export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais into U.S. dollars was R$3.504 to US$1.00, based. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the selling ratebalance of our fair value adjustment as reporteda consequence of the gross debt balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, negatively affecting our results of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our financial liabilities, we do not anticipate any substantial effect on our liquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our capital expenditures and operating leases require us to acquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in or linked to foreign currencies, some of which are financed by liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to our capital expenditures against risks related to movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the U.S. dollar, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the 17.1% depreciation of thereal during 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy limited inflation and allowed the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Brazilian Central Bank. The selling rate was R$3.905 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2015, R$2.656 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2014

Market Share and R$2.343 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2013, in each case, as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuates widely, and the selling rate on May 13, 2016 may not be indicative of future exchange rates. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates” for information regarding exchange rates for thereal since January 1, 2010.Other Information

Solely for the convenience of the reader, we have translated some amounts included in “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Information” andWe make statements in this annual report fromreais into U.S. dollars usingabout our market share and other information relating to the selling ratetelecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained from third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as reportedinformation and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the Brazilian Central Bank on December 31, 2015accuracy or completeness of R$3.905 to US$1.00. These translations should not be considered representations that any such amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at that or at any other exchange rate.information.

Financial StatementsRounding

We maintain our books and records inreais. Our consolidated financial statements ashave made rounding adjustments to reach some of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the three years ended December 31, 2015 arefigures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

We prepare

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our consolidatedbusiness operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles,nature, that depend upon or U.S. GAAP. Based onrefer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our operating cash flowsactual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the Brazilian government’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

the cost and availability of financing;

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the impact such operating cash flowsother countries in which we have had on our liquidity, in combination with operations and investments;

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our indebtedness and the potential impact if we cannot satisfy certain financial covenants under our current debt instruments in 2016, our independent registered public accounting firm has included an emphasis paragraph related to the substantial doubt with respect to services;

our ability to continue as a going concernimplement our corporate strategies in their report onorder to expand our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. However,customer base and increase our financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.average revenue per user;

We are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP, which are based on:

Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76, as amended by Brazilian Law No. 9,457/97, Brazilian Law No. 10,303/01, and Brazilian Law No. 11,638/07, which we refer to collectively as the Brazilian Corporation Law;

 

  the rules

political, regulatory and regulationseconomic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliáriosreal,), or the CVM,interest rates fluctuation and the Brazilian Federal Accounting Council (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade); andpolitical environment in Brazil;

 

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, on our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of our customers to pay for services on a timely basis;

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior; and

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not rely on these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1.the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis), or the CPC.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Certain Defined TermsNot applicable.

Unless otherwise indicated

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report. We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 
   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

    

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315  (16,179  (15,669
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821   5,881   8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548  (3,853  (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782  (2,739  (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469  (4,557  (3,243
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977  (5,268  (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110  26,609   (3,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087  21,341   (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8  3,275   (1,099
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling shareholders

   (95  24   (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

   (8,765  22,036   (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   (236  2,555   (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   (7.57  81.94   (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915   155,915 

(1)

Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

   As of December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   17,797    22,896    (13,513

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this annual report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, the market price of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes to these regulations have and may continue to adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the contextimposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, requires:these modifications and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

all referencesOur concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to “our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us”comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or similarthe PGMU, the Quality Management Regulations (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade), or the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMU and the RGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries;

all references to “Oi” are to Oi S.A.;
Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

 

ii


all references

Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to “TmarPart” areperiodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to Telemar Participações S.A., which,these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the capital increase of Oi on May 5, 2014, wasexpiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the direct controlling shareholder of Oiright, following public consultations, to impose new terms and which merged withconditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and into Oi on September 1, 2015;

all references to “Telemar” are to Telemar Norte Leste S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

all references to “Pharol” are to Pharol, SGPS, S.A. (formerly known as Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.);

all references to “PT Portugal” are to PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., which we acquired on May 5, 2014domestic and sold on June 2, 2015;
international economic conditions. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

all referencesWe cannot assure you that any future amendments to our Common ADSs are to American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, each representing five common shares ofconcession agreements will not impose requirements on our company all referencesthat will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Preferred ADSs areBrazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to ADSs, each representing one preferred shareconvert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of our company,Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and all referencesthereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to our ADSs areassume obligations to our Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs;

all references to “Brazil” aremake additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the Federative Republicexpansion of Brazil; and

all references to the “Brazilian government” are to the federal governmentbroadband services. The cost of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

Acquisition and Disposition of PT Portugal

On May 5, 2014, we concluded a capital increase, which we refer to as the Oi capital increase, in which we issued (1) 121,674,063 of our common shares and 280,483,641 of our preferred shares for an aggregate amount of R$8,250 million in cash, and (2) 104,580,393 of our common shares and 172,025,273 of our preferred shares to Pharoladditional investments in exchange for the contribution by Pharolelimination of such obligations, would be subject to our companydiscussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of all ofthem under the shares of its subsidiary PT Portugal. PT Portugal provides a broad range of telecommunications services in Portugal and owned significant interests in telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe in Africa and Timor-Leste in Asia.

On June 2, 2015, we sold all of the share capital of PT Portugal to Altice Portugal for a purchase price equalapplicable concession. Prior to the enterprise valuepassage of PT PortugalLaw No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of €6,900 million,renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to adjustments baseda public consultation period that is expected to expire on the financial debt, cashApril 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and working capital of PT Portugalto what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on the closing date, plus an additional earn-out amount of €500 million in the event that the consolidated revenues of PT Portugal and its subsidiaries (as of the closing date) for any single year between the year ending December 31, 2015 and the year ending December 31, 2019 is equal to or exceeds €2,750 million.

In connection with the closing, Altice Portugal disbursed €5,789 million, of which €869 million was utilized by PT Portugal to prepay outstanding indebtedness in that amount, and €4,920 million were paid to our company in cash. As of December 31, 2015, we had used R$8,682 million of the net cash proceeds of the PT Portugal Disposition for the prepayment of indebtedness of our company, and2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have usednot decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concessions, we may be able to participate in competitive auctions for new concessions that the Brazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions, and we may not be able to secure new concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions or such concessions may be on less favorable terms than our current concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an additionalextensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL published Resolution No. 700/2018, a regulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that makes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding the technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We expect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, ANATEL is expected to conduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides and preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the systems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our controls, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or that these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, our operating network and information systems could be compromised, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our debt instruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financing of R$5,35031,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of these net cash proceeds forOi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the prepayment and repayment ofinstruments that govern our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our company. We expect to useconsolidated indebtedness and the remainderrequirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these net cash proceeds fordebt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the repayment of indebtednessability of our company.subsidiaries, to:

incur or guarantee additional debt;

grant liens over or pledge assets;

sell or dispose of assets;

merge or consolidate with another company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

These covenants could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our operational or capital needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2019, we were in full compliance with our financial covenants under our financial instruments.

In anticipationaddition, the failure of Oi and our restricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the PT Portugal Disposition, PT Portugal transferred Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.,holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or PTIF, its wholly-owned finance subsidiary,cash flow may not be sufficient to Oi.fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on those debt agreements.

Furthermore, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. As a result of the completiondepreciation of the PT Portugal Disposition,real subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of PTIF, which had previously been classified as liabilities associatedMarch 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses in the instruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness.

Under the RJ Plan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to apply an amount equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from our sale of assets held for salein excess of US$200 million to investments in our consolidatedactivities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on an annual basis an amount equivalent to 70% of the amount by which (1) our cash and cash equivalents and financial statements, was reclassified as indebtednessinvestments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our company. In addition, in connection with the PT Portugal Disposition, PTIF assumed all obligations under PT Portugal’s outstanding 6.25% Notes due 2016.

In addition, PT Portugal transferredoperating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to Oi all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações, SGPS, S.A., or PT Participações, which holds:

iii


our 75% interest in Africatel Holding B.V., or Africatel, which holds our interests in telecommunications companies in Africa, including telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe; and

our interests in TPT—Telecomunicações Públicas de Timor, S.A., or TPT, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste.

Share Splits

On August 15, 2012, we changed the ratio applicable to our Preferred ADS from three preferred shares per Preferred ADS to one preferred share per Preferred ADS. All references to numbers of Preferred ADSs in this annual report have been adjusted to give effect to this change in ratio.

On November 18, 2014, our shareholders acting in an extraordinary general shareholders meeting authorized (1) the reverse split of all of our issued common shares into one common share for each 10 issued common shares, and (2) the reverse split of all of our issued preferred shares into one preferred share for each 10 issued preferred shares. This reverse share split became effective on December 22, 2014. There was no changeadjustment in the ratio of our Common ADSsevent that we conclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This debt may be denominated inreais or Preferred ADSsin foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this reversenew debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial expenses and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties, although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims are entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified and, as a result, the RJ Debtors are declared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the debtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, or (2) seek to have the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by the RJ Court.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2019, we had provisioned R$5,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2019, we had claims against us of R$28,416 million in tax proceedings, R$798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions. We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal disposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi capital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and (2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the share split; each Common ADS continuespurchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal disposition, we agreed to represent oneindemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our common sharesrepresentations and each Preferred ADS continueswarranties under the share purchase agreement, subject to represent onecertain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our preferred shares. All referencesrepresentations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to numberscertain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to credit risks with respect to our customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of sharesoperations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$489 million, or 2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$774 million.

ANATEL regulations allow us to implement certain policies to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our company dividendwith certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to these agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our company.

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (OperaçãoMapa da Mina). One of the main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the investigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in exchange for benefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our business with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officers or members of our board of directors were involved in our historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We cannot predict when the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be completed or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the outcome or impact of any resulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our public reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offeringfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. ThePay-TV market in Brazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in the cord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), or 3G, and our Long Term Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. Our competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use of OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information about specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

efficiently allocating our capital;

increasing marketing activities;

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

continuous attention to service quality; and

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises that restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in the process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions where we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain essential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other essential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such essential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where essential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

the imposition of customs or other duties on essential equipment that is imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, certain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded R$633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the commitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market prices of our Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Oi is a Brazilian corporation, and substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, among other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, especially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, including:

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

economic, political or social instability;

fluctuating exchange rates;

inflation;

interest rates and monetary policies;

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

energy policy;

exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes to the policies, regulations or standards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Ongoing political instability has adversely affected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The Brazilian economy has been affected by political events in Brazil, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the public in general, adversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and heightening the volatility of securities issued by Brazilian companies.

Brazilian markets have also experienced heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing investigations conducted by the Brazilian Federal Police and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies, have been convicted of political corruption related to bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery schemes. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict whether the ongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to heightened economic and political volatility in Brazil, nor whether new investigations against politicians and/or officers of private companies will occur in the future.

In addition, in October 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the total number of senators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office at the beginning of 2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on January 1, 2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as well as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of Brazilian securities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil has the power to determine policies and issue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy that affect the operations and financial performance of companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies the newly elected president will adopt or if these policies or changes in current policies may have an adverse effect on us or the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.

Since 1999, exchange rates for thereal have been set by the market, i.e., a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate between thereal, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal has experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated against the U.S. dollar by 47.1% during 2015. During 2016, thereal appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 16.5% and thereal depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018, and 4.0% in 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, R$18,294 million, or 57.8%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$9,521 million, or 52.2%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated PIK Toggle Notes and export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the balance of our fair value adjustment as a consequence of the gross debt balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, negatively affecting our results of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our company and earnings per sharefinancial liabilities, we do not anticipate any substantial effect on our liquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our companycapital expenditures and operating leases require us to acquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in this annual report have been adjustedor linked to give effectforeign currencies, some of which are financed by liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to our capital expenditures against risks related to movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the 10-for-one reverse share split.

On February 1, 2016, we changedU.S. dollar, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the ratio applicable to our Common ADSs from one common share per Common ADS to five common shares per Common ADS. All references to numbers17.1% depreciation of Common ADSs in this annual report have been adjusted to give effect to this change in ratio.

thereal during 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy limited inflation and allowed the Central Bank of Brazil (

Market Share and Other Information

We make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to the telecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained from third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as information and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such information.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

 

iv


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our business operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

 

our ability to continue as a going concern and the success of our efforts to optimize our liquidity and debt profile;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

 

the Brazilian government’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

 

the cost and availability of financing;

 

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our services;

 

our ability to implement our corporate strategies in order to expand our customer base and increase our average revenue per user;

 

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil;

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of thereal,interest rates fluctuation and the political environment in Brazil;

 

inflation

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and fluctuations in exchange rates;internationally, on our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of our customers to pay for services on a timely basis;

 

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

 

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior; and

 

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not rely on these forward-looking statements.

v


We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

vi


PART I

 

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto), “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

The following selected financial data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 20152019 and 20142018 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 20112017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report.

We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with respect toour audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity paid to holders of our common shares and preferred shares since January 1, 2011 inreaisand in U.S. dollars translated fromreaisat the commercial market selling rate in effect as of the payment date under the caption “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy—Payment of Dividends.”2014.

 

   As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2015(1)  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
   (in millions
of US$,
except per
share
amounts)
  

(in millions ofreais, except per share amounts and as otherwise

indicated)

 

Income Statement Data:

       

Net operating revenue

  US$7,005   R$27,354   R$28,247   R$28,422   R$28,141   R$27,907  

Cost of sales and services

   (4,161  (16,250  (16,257  (16,467  (15,825  (16,180
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   2,844    11,104    11,990    11,955    12,316    11,727  

Operating expenses

   (2,533  (9,891  (7,377  (7,972  8,579    9,016  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

   311    1,213    4,613    3,983    3,737    2,712  

Financial income

   1,374    5,365    1,345    1,375    2,332    2,227  

Financial expenses

   (3,048  (11,903  (5,894  (4,677  (4,950  (5,697
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses), net

   (1,674  (6,538  (4,549  (3,302  (2,617  (3,471
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) of continuing operations before taxes

   (1,364  (5,325  64    681    1,120    (759

Income tax and social contribution

   (866  (3,380  (758  (77  (254  202  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) of continuing operations

   (2,229  (8,705  (694  604    866    (557

Net income (loss) of discontinued operations, net of taxes

   (222  (867  (4,086  —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   (2,451  (9,572  (4,780  604    866    (557

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (166  (647  (14  34    (319  (133
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

  US$(2,617 R$(10,219 R$(4,794 R$638   R$547   R$(690
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

   (2,346  (9,159  (4,782  604    859    (296

  As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2015(1) 2015 2014 2013   2012   2011   For the Year Ended December 31, 
  (in millions
of US$,
except per
share
amounts)
 

(in millions ofreais, except per share amounts and as otherwise

indicated)

   2019 2018 2017 
  (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

             

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315 (16,179 (15,669
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821  5,881  8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548 (3,853 (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782 (2,739 (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469 (4,557 (3,243
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977 (5,268 (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110 26,609  (3,197
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087 21,341  (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8 3,275  (1,099
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling shareholders

   (106 (413 1    —       7     (261   (95 24  (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares (2):

    R$(1,569 190     289     (296

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

  US$(1,011 R$(3,947 (3,213 414     570     —       (8,765 22,036  (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   (1,335 (5,212         (236 2,555  (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

    (7.76 3.69     5.73     (6.49    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (3.21 (12.55 (7.76 3.69     5.73     —       (1.51 16.39  (9.42

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (3.21 (12.55      

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations:

    (1.13 3.69     5.73     (6.49

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (2.91 (11.36 (1.13 3.69     5.73     —    

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (2.91 (11.36      

Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:

    (6.63  —       —       —    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   0.30   (1.19 (6.63  —       —       —    

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   (7.57 81.94  (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   0.30   (1.19         (1.51 16.39  (9.42

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

             

Common shares – basic

   —     314,518   202,312   51,476     50,499     45,615  

Common shares – diluted

   —     314,518   202,312   51,476     50,499     46,560  

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic

   —     415,321   414,200   112,527     99,488     53,693  

Preferred shares and ADSs – diluted

   —     415,321   414,200   112,527     99,488     54,092  

Common shares – basic and diluted

   5,788,447  1,344,686  519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615  155,915  155,915 

 

(1)Translated for convenience only using the selling rate as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank on December 31, 2015 forreais into U.S. dollars of R$3.905=US$1.00.
(2)In accordance with ASC 260, basic

Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 2322 to our audited consolidated financial statements which are included in this annual report.

 

   As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2015(1)   2015   2014   2013   2012   2011 
   

(in

millions of
US$,
except per
share
amounts)

   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts and as otherwise
indicated)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

            

Cash and cash equivalents

  US$3,815    R$14,898    R$2,449    R$2,425    R$4,413    R$11,025  

Short-term investments

   461     1,802     171     493     2,426     2,299  

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   2,146     8,380     7,450     7,097     7,018     5,861  

Assets held for sale

   1,968     7,686     34,255     —       —       —    

Total current assets

   9,786     38,214     51,354     18,100     21,802     26,242  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   6.612     25,818     26,244     25,725     24,640     23,165  

Non-current judicial deposits

   3,360     13,119     12,260     11,051     9,723     7,786  

Intangible assets, net

   3,017     11,780     13,554     14,666     15,869     16,329  

  As of and For the Year Ended December 31,   As of December 31, 
  2015(1)   2015   2014   2013   2012   2011   2019   2018   2017 
  

(in

millions of
US$,
except per
share
amounts)

   (in millions of reais, except per share amounts and as otherwise
indicated)
   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   25,438     99,335     110,741     78,727     78,647     81,382     71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term loans and financings (including current portion of long-term debt)

   3,024     11,810     4,464     4,159     3,114     4,600  

Liabilities of assets held for sale(2)

   191     745     27,178     —       —       —    

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   6,557     25,605     42,580     15,571     17,127     17,114     11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term loans and financings

   12,305     48,048     31,386     31,695     30,232     25,169  

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   21,175     82,688     83,588     58,713     58,218     56,162     54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   5,490     21,438     21,438     7,471     7,308     3,731     32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   4,263     16,646     27,153     20,013     20,428     25,219     17,797    22,896    (13,513

Shareholders’ equity attributable to controlling shareholders

   3,958     15,456     25,644     20,013     20,428     13,826  

Shareholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling shareholders

   305     1,191     1,509     —       —       11,393  

 

(1)Translated for convenience only using the selling rate as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank on December 31, 2015 forreais into U.S. dollars of R$3.905=US$1.00.
(2)As of December 31, 2014, includes short-term loans and financings (including current portion of long-term debt) of R$1,935 million and long-term loans and financings of R$16,958 million that remained obligations of our company following the completion of our sale of PT Portugal.

Exchange Rates

The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer ofreais by any person or legal entity, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.

Since 1999, the Brazilian Central Bank has allowed the U.S. dollar-real exchange rate to float freely, and, since then, the U.S. dollar-real exchange rate has fluctuated considerably.

In the past, the Brazilian Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Brazilian Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to permit thereal to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through the return of a currency band system or otherwise. Thereal may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar and/or the euro substantially. Furthermore, Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a significant imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are serious reasons to foresee a significant imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. We cannot assure you that such measures will not be taken by the Brazilian government in the future. See “—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil—Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may impair our ability to service certain debt obligations.”

The following table shows the commercial selling rate or selling rate, as applicable, for U.S. dollars for the periods and dates indicated.The information in the “Average” column represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the periods presented.

   Reais per U.S. Dollar 

Year

  High   Low   Average   Period End 

2011

   1.902     1.535     1.671     1.876  

2012

   2.112     1.702     1.959     2.044  

2013

   2.446     1.953     2.161     2.343  

2014

   2.740     2.197     2.354     2.656  

2015

   4.195     2.575     3.339     3.905  

   Reais per U.S. Dollar 

Month

  High   Low 

October 2015

  R$4.001    R$3.739  

November 2015

   3.851     3.701  

December 2015

   3.983     3.748  

January 2016

   4.156     3.986  

February 2016

   4.049     3.865  

March 2016

   3.991     3.559  

April 2016

   3.692     3.451  

May 2016 (1)

   3.555     3.465  

(1)Through May 13, 2016.

Source: Brazilian Central Bank

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this annual report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, you may lose all or partthe market price of your original investment.the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

General Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is subjecthighly regulated. Changes to frequent changes in technology. Our abilitythese regulations have and may continue to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affectadversely impact our business.

Companies in theThe Brazilian telecommunications industry must adapt to rapidis highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobileuniversal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications industryservice providers. Changes in particular has experienced rapidlaws and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsoleteregulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or inefficient, whichlicenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our competitivenessbusiness, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, these modifications and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or the PGMU, the Quality Management Regulations (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade), or the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to increasemeet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our capital expendituresservice areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in orderany one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to maintainprovide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our competitive position. For example,obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we have made significant investments inreceive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the last three yearsvarious service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with the implementationsuch noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System), or 3G, services, and are making investmentsinability to achieve certain targets established in the implementation of our LTE (Long Term Evolution), or 4G, services. In addition, we believe that inPGMU and the medium-term, personal mobility service providersRGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

Our concession agreements in Brazil will experience increasing competition from over-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers will become increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communicationsare subject to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype. Since November 2011, we have deployed a network of Wi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial sites, outdoor public spaces and residential access points. It is possible that alternative technologies may be developed that are more advanced than those we currently provide. We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adoptedperiodic modifications by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us,ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that wethe modifications to these concession agreements will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations dependnot have adverse effects on our abilitycompany.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to maintain, upgradeconcession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and operate efficientlymay be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Under their existing terms, our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely onconcession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the systems of other carriers under co-billing agreements.latest.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vitalWe cannot assure you that any future amendments to our growthconcession agreements will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate successfullyin the private regime and upgradethereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our accounting, information and processing systems orconcession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that these systems will continuegovern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to perform as expected. We have entered into co-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service providera public consultation period that is interconnectedexpected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our networks in Brazil to include inpublic regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our invoicesconcessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the executiondate of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whomthis annual report, we have co-billingnot decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concessions, we may be able to participate in competitive auctions for new concessions that the Brazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements could impairwill not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions, and we may not be able to secure new concessions for our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affectexisting service areas in any future auctions or such concessions may be on less favorable terms than our current concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Improper use of our networks could adversely affect our costs and results of operations.

We may incur costs associated with the unauthorized and fraudulent use of our networks, including administrative and capital costs associated with detecting, monitoring and reducing the incidence of fraud. Fraud

also affects interconnection costs and payments to other carriers for non-billable fraudulent roaming. Improper use of our network could also increase our selling expenses if we need to increase our provision for doubtful accounts to reflect amounts we do not believe we can collect for improperly made calls. Any increase in the improper use of our network in the future couldoperations would be materially adversely affect our costs and results of operations.affected.

Our operations are dependent upon our networks. A system failure could cause delays or interruptions of service, which could cause us to suffer losses.

Failure in our networks, or their backup mechanisms, may result in service delays or interruptions and limit our ability to provide customers with reliable service over our networks. Some of the risks to our networks and infrastructure include (1) physical damage to access lines and long-distance optical cables; (2) power surges or outages; (3) software defects; (4) disruptions beyond our control; (5) breaches of security; and (6) natural disasters. The occurrence of any such event could cause interruptions in service or reduce capacity for customers, either of which could reduce our net operating revenue or cause us to incur additional expenses. In addition, the occurrence of any such event may subject us to penalties and other sanctions imposed by ANATEL, and may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be harmed by reports suggesting thatrequired to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions causeand be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. On June 29, 2015,In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL commencedpublished Resolution No. 700/2018, a public consultationregulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that makes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding its proposed Regulatory Agendathe technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the 2015-2016 cycle,installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which among other items,could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We expect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, ANATEL is expected to conduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides forand preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the reevaluationexpected benefits of regulations regarding human exposureour investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Althoughus, and we believe these regulations have not had a material impactcannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the businesssystems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our companycontrols, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to date,damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the Brazilian governmentquality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or ANATEL may enact new lawsthat these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or regulations regarding electromagnetic emissionsany problems with the execution of invoicing and exposurecollection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, our operating network and information systems could be compromised, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

We have a substantial amount ofOur debt whichinstruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financing of R$59,85731,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate principal amount of outstanding debt.R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the instruments that govern some of our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our consolidated indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these debt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to:

 

incur or guarantee additional debt;

 

grant liens;liens over or pledge assets;

 

pledge assets;

sell or dispose of assets; and

 

merge or consolidate with another company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

If we are unableThese covenants could limit our ability to incur additional debt, we may be unableplan for or react to invest inmarket conditions or to meet our business and make necessaryoperational or advisable capital expenditures,needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2019, we were in full compliance with our financial covenants under our financial instruments.

In addition, the failure of Oi and our restricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or cash required to service our indebtedness reduces the amount available to us to make capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate operating cash flows, weflow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to continue servicing our debt.repay, refinance or restructure the payments on those debt agreements.

Furthermore, some of our debt instruments includewith BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi or Telemar to maintain certainfive specified financial ratios. Prior to December 31, 2015, we executed temporary modifications of each of our debt instruments that contain covenants requiring Oi to maintain specified levels of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (other than the debt instruments governing Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances of debentures), pursuant to which Oi was required to maintainratios, measured on a consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio, determined based on our financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, of no more than 6.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2015. Most of these temporary modifications continue to require Oi to maintain a consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 6.0 to 1.0 for each of the fiscal quarters of 2016. Upon the expiration of these temporary modifications, the consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio that Oi is required to maintain under each ofquarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, will be reduced to their pre-existing levels, the most restrictive of which will require that Oi maintain a consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio of less than 4.0 to 1.0. Under each of these debt instruments, the creditorBNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the end of any applicable perioddate the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with the defined financial covenants ratios. We have repaid the principal amount outstanding under Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances of debentures in the aggregate amount of R$23 million.

Our debt facilities with BNDES contained a number of financial covenants (including ratios with respect to shareholders equity to total assets and consolidated debt to EBITDA) that were measured on a semi-annual basis on June 30 and December 31. Under these debt facilities, noncompliance withany two or more of these covenants in one semi-annual period would automatically trigger the right of BNDES to retain proceeds (in an amount equivalent to three times our next amortization payment under each debt facility with BNDES) from receivables otherwise payable to us in reserve accounts pledged for the benefit of BNDES until such time as the breach is cured.

On June 30, 2015,ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were not in compliance with the covenants in each of our debt facilities with BNDES that require Oi to maintain a shareholder’s equity to EBITDA ratio of at least 0.25 to 1 and a consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio of less than 4.0 to 1. As a result, BNDES, had the right to retain proceeds from receivables in reserve accounts pledged for the benefit of BNDES, as described above. In November, 2015, we and BNDES amended the terms of each of our debt facilities with BNDES.these financial covenants. As a result of these amendments, (1) the consolidated debtdepreciation of thereal subsequent to consolidated EBITDA ratio, determined basedDecember 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP,U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that Oiit was required to maintain was increased to 6.0 to 1.0 for the Decemberprobable that as of March 31, 2015 measurement date, (2) the measurement period under each of these debt facilities was reduced to quarterly periods, and (3) BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt under each of these debt facilities, at the end of any applicable period,2020, we arewould not be in compliance with twomore than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or more ofcross-acceleration clauses in the financial covenants contained in these debt facilities.

We were in compliance with each of the financial covenants applicable the debt instruments to which Oi and its subsidiaries are a party as of December 31, 2015governing our other indebtedness (other than the debt instruments governing Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances ofOi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures). We are seeking waivers from those creditors for which these temporary modifications do not cover all measurement periods to and including the periods ending on December 31, 2016. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that these waivers will be obtained. In the event that we are unable to obtain waivers of the anticipated breaches of these covenants in these debt instruments, or identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile, we may be unable to meet our obligations under these debt instruments in the event that the creditors under these debt instruments seek to enforce their available remedies.

Under the Trust Deed governing each of the Bonds issued by PTIF (other than the PTIF 6.25% Notes due 2016), or the PTIF Bonds, we were required to file audited financial statements of PTIF as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce no later than January 31, 2016. On April 29, 2016, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, the trustee under this Trust Deed, or the PTIF Trustee, delivered a written notice to PTIF and Oi noting that the failure of PTIF to provide the 2014 audited financial statements constituted a potential event of default under the PTIF Bonds and requesting the delivery of those financial statements. PTIF is continuing to work with its auditor to complete the preparation of its 2014 audited financial statements as soon as possible.

The PTIF Trustee has notified PTIF that if PTIF fails to deliver the financial statements on or prior to May 29, 2016 and the PTIF Trustee determines that this failure is materially prejudicial to the interests of the holders of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee could declare that the PTIF Bonds are immediately due and repayable. Under the terms of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee is not obliged to exercise its discretion to declare any PTIF Bonds immediately due and repayable or to take any other action to enforce the rights of the holders of the PTIF Bonds unless it shall have been indemnified to its satisfaction and specifically directed or requested to do so by a requisite percentage of the holders of the PTIF Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PTIF Bonds.

The instruments governing a substantial portion of our indebtedness contain cross-acceleration clauses and the occurrence of an event of default under one of theseour debt instruments couldwith BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness or those obligations. Were a substantialindebtedness.

Under the RJ Plan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to apply an amount equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from our sale of assets in excess of US$200 million to investments in our activities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on an annual basis an amount equivalent to 70% of the amount by which (1) our cash and cash equivalents and financial investments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our outstanding indebtednessoperating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to repay such debt when due.

If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or comply with our debt covenants, we could be forced to renegotiate or refinance our indebtedness or seek additional equity capital. In this circumstance, we may be unable to obtain financing on satisfactory terms, or at all.

On March 9, 2016, we announcedadjustment in the event that we had retained PJT Partnersconclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

For more information regarding the debt instruments of our company and our indebtedness as of December 31, seedescribed under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

This debt may be denominated inOur independent registered public accounting firm has indicated thatreais or in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this new debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition raises substantial doubt as toexpenses and negatively affect our ability to continue as a going concern.overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

Based on our operating cash flows and the impact such operating cash flows have had on our liquidity, in combinationOn June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the level of our indebtedness and the potential impact if we cannot satisfy certain financial covenants under our current debt instruments in 2016, our independent registered public accounting firm has included an emphasis paragraph relatedother RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the substantial doubtBrazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to our abilitythe RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to continueits terms, is currently binding on all parties, although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a going concern in their report on our consolidated financial statements forresult of the year ended December 31, 2015. However, our financial statementspending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been prepared assuming we will continuenovated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims are entitled only to operate as a going concern, which contemplatesreceive the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilitiesrecoveries set forth in the normal course of business. If we become unable to continue as a going concern, we may seekRJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the protectionterms and conditions of the courts through ajudicially supervised reorganization (recuperação judicial) proceeding in BrazilRJ Plan.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or liquidate our assets, and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our consolidated financial statements. The reaction of investors and others to the inclusion of a going concern statement by our auditors, our operating cash flows and questions regarding our potential inability to continue as a going concern may cause others to choose not to deal with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations and may materially adversely affect our share price and our ability to continue to execute our business plans, raise new capital and/or make our scheduled debt payments on a timely basis or at all.

Because our cash flows from operating activities are negative, and are expected to continue to be negative through 2016, we will likely need to meet our obligations and fund our working capital with cash on hand and proceeds from existing amounts available under our financing facilities.

Our cash flows from operations were negative in 2015, and based on our current plans, we expect our cash flows from operating activities to remain negative through 2016. Our current projections are based on a number of key assumptions relating to, among other things, attainment of traffic volume targets, customer base, launching of

bundled products attractive to customers, service sales prices, foreign exchange fluctuation and the success of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize the liquidity and debt profile. If any of our assumptions are not borne out or are otherwise not correct, our cash flows from operations could be significantly lower than expected. As a result, our cash flows from operating activities could continue to be negative and our capital expenditures and debt service obligations could exceed our cash flows from operations beyond 2016 and for an extended period of time. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in executing on our plans or that we will generate positive cash flows from operations or cash flows from operations sufficient to cover our capital expenditures and debt service obligations in the future.

We plan to maintain a significant level of capital expenditures in order to continue to pursue our business plans. Additionally, based on our current level of debt, we are obligated to make payments of cash interest and principal in the aggregate amount of R$15,282 million during 2016. In addition, we need to pay cash taxes and fund our working capital.

Because of the combined impact of our recent and projected results of operations, our non-investment grade credit rating, the inclusion of the going concern statement in the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, restrictions in our current debt and/or general conditions in the financial and credit markets, our access to the capital markets is likely to be limited or nonexistent. As a result, we will need to meet our obligations and fund our working capital with cash on hand and proceeds from existing amounts available under our financing facilities. We may not be able to meet our obligations or other means for any significant period of time,modified and, as a result, if wethe RJ Debtors are unable to successfully restructure our debt on terms satisfactory to our company, we may not be able to execute our business plan or meet our obligations. If we become unable to meet our obligations, we may seek the protectiondeclared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the courts throughdebtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a judicially supervised reorganization (recuperação judicial) proceeding in Brazil.

Any downgradebreach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the ratings of our companyBrazilian Bankruptcy Law, or our debt securities would likely result in increased interest and other financial expenses related(2) seek to our borrowings and debt securities and could reduce our liquidity.

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., or Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, or Moody’s, and Fitch, Inc., or Fitch, maintain ratings of our company and our debt securities. Currently, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch maintain ratings of our company on a local and a global basis. On a global basis, Standard & Poor’s maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “CCC-,” Moody’s maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “Caa1,” and Fitch maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “CCC.” Our export credit facility guaranteedhave the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by Exportkreditnämnden, or EKN, contained a requirement that we prepay all outstanding amounts in the event that our credit rating was downgraded below Ba2 by Moody’s or BB by Fitch. As a result of the actions by these rating agencies, we were required to prepay the outstanding principal amount under this export credit agreement of R$202 million in April 2016. Any decision by these agencies to downgrade the ratings of our company or of our debt securities in the future would likely result in increased interest and other financial expenses relating to our borrowings and debt securities and the inclusion of financial covenants in the instruments governing new indebtedness, and could significantly reduce our ability to obtain such financing on satisfactory terms or in amounts required by us.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We rely on a few strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and services, including Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda., or Nokia Solutions, Huawei do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda., or Huawei, Ericsson Telecomunicações S.A., or Ericsson, and A.R.M. Engenharia Ltda., or A.R.M. Engenharia, to provide us with equipment, materials and services that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our extensive and geographically widespread networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers,

including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or service to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

As a result of our financial condition, suppliers of the equipment, materials and services necessary for our operations and expansion may require further assurances from us in order to continue doing business with us.

We believe that our suppliers may take our financial condition, particularly to the extent that it is perceived to impact our ability to continue to make timely payments to them, into account when deciding whether to continue or begin providing equipment and services to us. During 2015, our operating cash flows have been negatively affected by a number of factors. If suppliers or potential suppliers who are aware of our deteriorating financial situation become concerned that we will be unable to continue to perform under our agreements or make timely payments, they may require advance payments, financial guarantees or other assurances before they provide equipment, materials or services to us or may refuse to provide equipment, materials or services to us at all. If suppliers were to do so, our ability to expand and maintain our networks or operate our business may be impaired, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.RJ Court.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had provisioned R$4,4355,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had claims against us of R$24,04828,416 million in tax proceedings, R$780798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,2381,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions.

We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

The minority shareholder of Africatel has asserted that our acquisition of PT Portugal triggered its right to require us to purchase its shares of Africatel under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement. If we are required to purchase this interest in Africatel, it will divert resources that could otherwise be deployed to reduce indebtedness or make investments under our business plan. If any such purchase is funded through our incurrence of additional debt, there would be a material adverse effect on our consolidated leverage.

We indirectly own 75% of the share capital of Africatel. Samba Luxco S.à.r.l., an affiliate of Helios Investors L.P., or Samba Luxco, owns the remaining 25%. Africatel holds all of our interests in telecommunications companies in sub-Saharan Africa, including our interests in Unitel, Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A. in Cape Verde, Mobile Telecommunications Limited in Namibia, and CST Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações S.A.R.L. in São Tomé and Príncipe, among others. Pharol, our subsidiaries Africatel GmbH & Co. KG, or Africatel GmbH, and PT Ventures SGPS S.A., or PT Ventures, and Samba Luxco are parties to a shareholders’

agreement, which we refer to as the Africatel shareholders’ agreement.

On September 16, 2014, our subsidiary, Africatel GmbH, which directly holds our interest in Africatel, received a letter from Samba Luxco in which Samba Luxco claimed that Oi’s acquisition of PT Portugal was deemed a change of control of Pharol under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement, and that this change of control entitled Samba Luxco to exercise a put right under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement at the fair market equity value of Samba Luxco’s Africatel shares. In the letter, Samba Luxco purported to exercise the alleged put right and thereby require Africatel GmbH to acquire its shares in Africatel.

On September 26, 2014, Africatel GmbH responded to Samba Luxco stating that there had not been any action or event that would trigger the right to exercise the put option under the Africatel’s shareholders’ agreement and that Africatel GmbH intended to challenge Samba Luxco’s purported exercise of the put option. On the same date, we issued a Material Fact disclosing Samba Luxco’s purported exercise of the put option, our understanding that the exercise of the put option is not applicable, and that our board of directors had authorized our management to take the necessary actions to sell our interest in Africatel.

On November 12, 2014, the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce notified Africatel GmbH that Samba Luxco had commenced arbitral proceedings against Africatel GmbH to enforce its purported put right or, in the alternative, certain other rights and claims allegedly arising out of Oi’s acquisition of PT Portugal. Africatel GmbH presented its answer to Samba Luxco’s request for arbitration on December 15, 2014. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on March 12, 2015 and the proceedings are ongoing. Africatel GmbH intends to continue to vigorously defend these proceedings.

If we were to acquire the interest of Samba Luxco in Africatel as a result of the exercise of Samba Luxco’s purported put right under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement, our acquisition of this interest would reduce the resources that would be available to us to reduce our outstanding indebtedness or pursue other investment opportunities. If any such purchase were to be funded through our incurrence of additional debt, the consolidated leverage of our company could increase materially, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal Dispositiondisposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of common sharesCommon Shares and preferred shares of our companyPreferred Shares as described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History7. Major Shareholders and Development—Rio Forte Defaults and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Exchange,Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi Capital Increase described under “Item 5. Operatingcapital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Oi Capital Increase and Acquisition of PT Portugal,” and from(2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the Share Purchase Agreementshare purchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal Disposition,disposition, we agreed to indemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our representations and warranties under the share purchase agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to potential liabilities relatingcredit risks with respect to our third-party service providers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to potential liabilities relating to our third-party service providers in Brazil. Such potential liabilities may involve claims by employees of third-party service providers in Brazil directly against us as if we were the direct employer of such employees, as well as claims against us for secondary liability for, among other things, occupational hazards, wage parity or overtime pay, in the event that such third-party service providers fail to meet their obligations to their employees. We have not recorded any provisions for such claims, and significant judgments against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to delinquencies of our accounts receivables.customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2015,2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$721489 million, or 2.6%2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2015,2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$561774 million.

ANATEL regulations preventallow us from implementingto implement certain policies that could have the effect of reducing delinquency of our customers in Brazil,to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis, whichbasis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would increase our provision for doubtful accounts and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our company with certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to these agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our company.

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (OperaçãoMapa da Mina). One of the main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the investigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in exchange for benefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our business with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officers or members of our board of directors were involved in our historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We cannot predict when the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be completed or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the outcome or impact of any resulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our public reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offeringfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. ThePay-TV market in Brazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in the cord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), or 3G, and our Long Term Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. Our competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use of OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information about specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

efficiently allocating our capital;

increasing marketing activities;

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

continuous attention to service quality; and

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises that restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in the process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions where we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain essential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other essential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such essential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where essential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

the imposition of customs or other duties on essential equipment that is imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2015,2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$544633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

Risks Relating to Our Brazilian Operations

Our Residential Services business faces competition from mobile services and other fixed-line service providers, which may adversely affect our revenues and margins.

Our Residential Services business, which provides local and long-distance fixed-line voice, fixed-line data, or broadband, and subscription television, or Pay-TV, services to our residential customers, as well as bundles of these services together with mobile services, faces competition from:

mobile services, as reductions in interconnection tariffs, which have led to more robust mobile package offerings, have driven the traffic migration trend of fixed-to-mobile substitution;

other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações – Embratel (a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., or América Móvil, one of the leading telecommunications service providers in Latin America), or Embratel, and GVT S.A. (a subsidiary of Telefônica Brasil S.A., or Telefônica Brasil, the largest telecommunications operator in Brazil), or GVT;

other broadband service providers, including Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A., or Net (a subsidiary of América Móvil, our primary competitor in the broadband services market); Companhia Paranense de Energia – Copel, or Copel, and Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG, or Cemig Telecom, which provide fiber optic infrastructure; and smaller regional broadband service providers; and

other Pay-TV service providers, including our primary competitor SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Net.

Based on information available from ANATEL, from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2015, the number of fixed lines in service (including the number fixed lines provided to our SME and Corporate Services customers) in our service areas (all of Brazil other than the state of São Paulo) declined from 27.7 million to 27.2 million. As of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL, (1) we had a market share of 56.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I of Brazil and a market share of 52.9% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II of Brazil (in each case, including the fixed lines provided to our SME and Corporate Services customers); (2) Embratel had a market share of 25.3% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I and a market share of 18.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II; and (3) GVT had a market share of 9.9% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I and a market share of 23.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to experience a slow decline, as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of “all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The rate at which the number of fixed lines in service in our service areas, a large majority of which are used by our residential customers, may decline depends on many factors beyond our control, such as economic, social, technological and other developments in Brazil. Because we derive a significant portion of our net operating revenue from our Residential Services business, the reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

Our broadband services in Brazil face strong competition from Embratel and Telefônica Brasil, which have market shares of 32.5% and 28.7% for broadband services in Brazil, respectively, according to data from ANATEL. As of January 2016, we had a market share of 25.1% for broadband services in Brazil, according to data from ANATEL. Embratel provides local fixed-line services to residential customers through Net’s cable network in the portions of Regions I and II where Net provides cable television service. Telefônica Brasil provides local fixed-line services through its own network and through its subsidiary GVT’s network. The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Net and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband and subscription television services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a

single network infrastructure. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

The primary providers of Pay-TV services in the regions in which we provide residential services are, SKY, which provides direct-to-home, or DTH, service, and América Móvil, which provides DTH service through Embratel under the “Claro TV” brand and Pay-TV services using coaxial cable through Net. We offer DTH services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. Future changes in satellite technology may result in one of our competitors utilizing new satellites for DTH services that have higher capacities or better quality of service, which could adversely affect our net operating revenue and may adversely affect our results of operations.

Our primary competitors for residential services, Embratel and Telefônica Brasil, are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company. In addition, we compete in our service areas with smaller companies that have been authorized by ANATEL to provide local fixed-line services. Increased competition from these small, regional companies may require us to increase our marketing expenses and our capital expenditures, which would lead to a decrease in our profitability. For a detailed description of our competition in the residential services market in Brazil, see “Item 4: Information on the Company—Competition—Residential Services.”

Our Personal Mobility Services business faces strong competition from fixed-line service providers other mobile services providers and internet data providers, which may adversely affect our revenues and margins.

The mobile services market in Brazil is extremely competitive. Our Personal Mobility Services business, which provides post-paid and pre-paid mobile voice services and post-paid and pre-paid mobile data communications services, faces competition from large competitors such as (1) TIM Participações S.A., or TIM, (2) Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” and (3) Claro S.A., a subsidiary of América Móvil, or Claro. As of December 31, 2015, based on information regarding the total number of subscribers as of that date available from ANATEL, we had a market share of 18.6% of the total number of mobile subscribers (including subscribers in our SME and Corporate Services), ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 28.4%, TIM with 25.7% and Claro with 25.6%. Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

Our ability to generate revenues from our Personal Mobility Services business depends on our ability to continue to maintain or increase the ARPU generated by our customer base, retain or increase the size of our customer base, improve the perception of the quality of our services and encourage the migration of our customers to our 3G and 4G networks through our offers of attractive data packages that take advantage of the structural shift from voice to data usage. The recent trend towards SIM card consolidation, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate in on-net calling plans and the demand for more aggressive data packages in the pre-paid market may result in a decline in the size of our customer base. The increased use of instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoiP, services on smartphone applications such as WhatsApp may result in a migration from voice to data services, which could have an adverse effect on the size and profitability of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the average customer churn rate in our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 12.4%.

We have experienced increased pressure to reduce our mobile rates in response to pricing competition. This pricing competition often takes the form of special promotional packages, which may include, among other things, mobile handset subsidies and traffic usage promotions. We no longer offer handset subsidies for new customers, and competing with the service plans and promotions offered by our competitors may cause an increase in our marketing expenses and customer-acquisition costs, which has adversely affected our result of operations during some periods in the past and could continue to adversely affect our results of operations. Our inability to compete effectively with these packages could result in our loss of market share and adversely affect our net operating revenue and

profitability. For a detailed description of our competition in the personal mobility services market in Brazil, see “Item 4: Information on the Company—Competition—Personal Mobility Services.”

Our SME and Corporate Services business faces strong competition from other mobile, fixed-line and information technology services providers, which may adversely affect our revenues and margins.

Our SME and Corporate Services business provides a la carte and bundled fixed-line voice and data services, mobile voice and data services and information technology services to our small- and medium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate customers, as well as interconnection, network usage and traffic transportation services to other telecommunications providers. The competition risks relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our SME and corporate customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers, respectively.

The Brazilian recession has had a significant negative effect on our operating revenue and margins as SMEs generally, including our customers, have reduced the size of their businesses and in some cases ceased operations, and a number of our Corporate customers have reduced their telecommunications spending as part of their overall cost-cutting efforts. Because we derive a significant portion of our net operating revenue from our SME and Corporate Services business, the loss of a significant number of SME or corporate customers would adversely affect our net operating revenue and may adversely affect our results of operations. For a detailed description of our competition in the business and corporate market in Brazil, see “Item 4: Information on the Company—Operations in Brazil—Competition—SME and Corporate Services.”

Our long-distance services in Brazil face significant competition, which may adversely affect our revenues.

In Brazil, unlike in the United States and elsewhere, a caller chooses its preferred long-distance carrier for each long-distance call, whether originated from a fixed-line telephone or a mobile handset, by dialing such carrier’s long-distance carrier selection code (Código de Seleção de Prestadora). The long-distance services market in Brazil has become less competitive as a result of ongoing reductions in the interconnection rates, as mandated by ANATEL. The proliferation of all-net service plans, particularly for mobile services, offers unlimited long-distance calls and data combination plans that have reduced the relevance of long-distance services for mobile services. As a result, competition for long-distance services in Brazil is limited to fixed-line voice services. We compete with Telefônica Brasil, which is the incumbent fixed-line service provider in the State of São Paulo. Competition in the Brazilian fixed-line long-distance market may require us to increase our marketing expenses and/or provide services at lower rates than those we currently expect to charge for such services. Competition in the Brazilian fixed-line long-distance market has had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our revenues and margins.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes in laws and regulations may adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, in July 2014 ANATEL approved rules under which interconnection rates charged by our company for the use of our fixed-line and mobile networks would be reduced over a period of years until they were set at rates based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. As a result, the mobile interconnection rates for Regions I, II and III declined by 25% each in February 2014, 33.3% each in February 2015 and 40.0%, 35.2% and 27.6%, respectively, in February 2016, with additional cuts approved through 2019. In addition, ANATEL approved cuts for most of our fixed interconnection rates ranging from 9.1% and 20.0% in February 2016, with additional cuts approved through 2019. These regulations will have adverse effects on our revenues, although as a result of reductions in our costs and expenses for these services that we acquire from other telecommunications providers, we cannot predict with certainty the effects that these regulations will have on our results of operations.

We cannot predict whether ANATEL, the Brazilian Ministry of Communications (Ministério das Comunicações) or the Brazilian government will adopt other telecommunications sector policies in the future or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025, and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions.

Our obligations under our concession agreements may be subject to revision in connection with each future amendment. On June 27, 2014, ANATEL opened a public comment period for the revision of the terms of our concession agreements. The comment period, which ended on December 26, 2014, was opened for comments on certain topics such as service universalization, rates and fees, among others. We submitted our comments during this period. Throughout 2015, ANATEL, the Brazilian Ministry of Communications and telecommunications service providers met regularly to discuss possible amendments to each of the concession agreements granted by ANATEL, including ours, and the implications of the developments and demands in the telecommunications sector in recent years. In September 2015, the Ministry of Communications created a working group, consisting of three members from each of ANATEL and the Ministry of Communications, to evaluate the status of the concessions and propose guidelines for the amendment of the concession agreements. In November 2015, the Ministry of Communications opened public consultation on the new regulatory framework for telecommunications. The Ministry of Communications has extended the deadline for contributions on multiple occasions. In April 2016, the Ministry of Communications, based on the working group’s findings, issued a decree addressing guidelines for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, which will be implemented by ANATEL through the conclusion of the concession amendments. The guidelines provide for, among other things, the expansion of broadband services (including in rural regions), the elimination of the reversibility of assets, and an extension of the term of our concessions, which are currently scheduled to expire in 2025. As a result of the publication of these guidelines, ANATEL requested a further postponement of the reviewRJ Proceedings, certain of our concession agreements, which was granted. As a result of this extension, the review of our concession agreements is currently scheduled to occur by December 2016.

We cannot assure you that any future amendments to our concession agreements, including the amendments now expected to be made in 2016, will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and we cannot assure you that our bids for new concessions upon the expiration of our existing concessions will be successful or that the pending expiration of these concessions will not have adverse effects on our ability to finance our operations.

Our concession agreements will expire on December 31, 2025. We expect the Brazilian government to offer new concessions in competitive auctions prior to the expiration of our existing concession agreements. We may participate in such auctions, but our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions. If we do not secure concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions, or if such concessions are on less favorable terms than our current concessions, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In addition, based on the current scheduled expiration of our concession agreements and the uncertainty that term of these concessions will be extended, investors may be unwilling to make investments in our company on terms that are attractive to our

company, or at all. Our inability to raise capital in the equity or debt markets on favorable terms, or at all, could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil, as well as our authorizations to provide personal mobile services in Brazil, contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan on Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), the General Plan on Quality Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Qualidade) and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4: Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Regulation of Fixed-Line Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our serviceunfunded obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of the commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the General Plan on Quality Goals and the General Plan on Universal Service Goals, among others.post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions inR$633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the amount of R$1,149 million in connection with fines sought to be imposed by ANATEL, including fines which we are contesting through judicial proceedings. Incommitment under the event that we are unsuccessful in obtaining final approvalterms of the inclusion of the R$5 billion of fines and claims we have proposed to be included in the Terms of Adjustment of Conduct (“Termos de Ajuste de Conduta”) program, or the TAC program, we could be required to constitute an additional provision of the portion of these fines and claims for which we have not previously established a provision. Additional fines from ANATEL, the establishment of an additional provision or fines in excess of the provisioned amount could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry” and “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. For example, on July 23, 2012, ANATEL temporarily suspended our ability to accept new customers for our mobile services in the States of Amazonas, Amapá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Roraima and Rio Grande do Sul due to ANATEL’s perception of our failure to meet capital investment and quality of service commitments in those states. This suspension lasted for approximately two weeks until we were able to propose new quality of service goals to ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Regulation of Mobile Services—Obligations of Personal Mobile Services Providers.”

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. Factors that could affect this implementation include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Risks Relating to Our African and Asian Operations

We may be unable to dispose of our interest in Africatel for a consideration that exceeds its carrying value in our financial statements or at all. Any impairment of the fair market value at which we record our indirect investment in Unitel in our financial statements would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel, representing 75% of the share capital of Africatel. As a result, as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, we recorded the assets and liabilities of Africatel as held-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our income statement dueRJ Plan related to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our results of operations. We have engaged a financial advisor to assist us with marketingobligations agreement, entered into by Oi and selling our interest in Africatel.

As of December 31, 2015, we recorded in our consolidated financial statements as assets heldFATL intended for sale R$7,686 million relating to our interest in Africatel and TPT, including R$2,042 million of accrued dividends owed to our company by Unitel and R$3,436 million representing the fair market value of Africatel’s 25% interest in Unitel, and recorded as liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale of R$745 million relating to our interest in Africatel and TPT. We are currently engaged in negotiations with the other shareholders of Unitel to seek alternatives for the realization of the value of our investment in Unitel.

We may not be able to sell our interest in Africatel for consideration that exceeds the book value of our interest in Africatel, or at all. The book value of our indirect investment in Unitel is subjected to testing for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value of our indirect investment in Unitel may be lower than the fair market value at which we carry this investment. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a R$408 million loss as a result of our review of the fair value of our investment in Unitel. Any further impairment of our indirect investment in Unitel may result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

We cannot assure you as to when PT Ventures will realize the accounts receivable recorded with respect to the declared and unpaid dividends owed to PT Ventures by Unitel or when PT Ventures will receive dividends that may have been declared with respect to 2014 or may be declared with respect to succeeding fiscal years.

Since November 2012, PT Ventures has not received any payments for outstanding amounts owed to it by Unitel with respect to dividends declared by Unitel for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the extraordinary dividends declared by Unitel in November 2010 based on its 2005 results of operations and free reserves held in 2006 through 2009. Based on the dividends declared by Unitel for those fiscal years, PT Ventures is entitled to receive the total amounts of US$187.5 million (R$732.2 million) with respect to fiscal year 2013, US$190.0 million (R$742.0 million) with respect to fiscal year 2012, US$190.0 million (R$742.0 million) with respect to fiscal year 2011, and US$157.5 million (R$615.0 million) with respect to the dividends declared in

2010. As of the date of this annual report, PT Ventures has only received US$63.7 million (R$248.7 million) of its share of the dividends declared by Unitel in 2010, and has not received any amount in respect of dividends declared by Unitel with respect to fiscal years 2011, 2012 or 2013.

On March 25, 2014, Unitel issued a statement claiming that PT Ventures is not listed on the shareholders’ register of Unitel, and that the board of directors of Unitel had notified Pharol about the existence of an irregularity, which purportedly resulted in Unitel being unable to distribute dividends to PT Ventures until the resolution of this irregularity. On June 3, 2014, the Angolan National Foreign Investment Agency endorsed the updating of PT Ventures’ name (formerly Portugal Telecom Internacional, SGPS, S.A.) in its Foreign Investment Certificate, confirming the current corporate name of the PT Ventures and thus remedying the irregularity alleged by Unitel’s board of directors.

At a general meeting of the shareholders of Unitel held on May 13, 2015, the other shareholders discussed the financial statements as well as the payment of dividends with respect to fiscal year 2014. The other Unitel shareholders did not permit PT Ventures to attend and participate in this shareholders’ meeting alleging that they did not acknowledge PT Ventures as a Unitel shareholder. As a result, PT Ventures has filed a suit against Unitel with an Angolan court seeking to nullify and cancel all actions purportedly taken by the May 13, 2015 shareholders’ meeting. PT Ventures has received a draft of the minutes of this meeting but has not received the final version. The draft minutes indicate that Unitel declared dividends in the amount of US$490.0 million (R$1,913.5 million), of which PT Ventures’ share amounts to US$122.5 million (R$478.4 million). Because we have not received fully executed minutes of this meeting, and because we are seeking to annul the actions taken by this meeting, we have not recorded our share of these dividends in our financial statements.

On several occasions, PT Ventures has requested an explanation from Unitel about its failure to pay to PT Ventures its share of the declared dividends. As of the date of this annual report, PT Ventures has not received a satisfactory explanation regarding this failure to pay, nor has PT Ventures received reliable indications as to the expected timing of the payment of the accrued dividends. As a result, PT Ventures has filed a suit against Unitel with an Angolan court seeking to collect its share ofmathematical provision without coverage by the dividends declared by Unitel in 2010, 2011, 2012plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and 2013, together with interest thereon. As a result of our institution of this suit, in 2015 we recognized a provision with respect to the unpaid dividends of US$132.2 million (R$516.2 million).

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in this suit, as to the timing, of the payment of the accrued dividendsEmployees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and note 27 to our company, or whether we will be able to receive dividends that have been declared with respect to fiscal year 2013 or may have been declared with respect to fiscal year 2014 or that may be declared by Unitel in the future. Our inability to receive these dividends could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment in Unitel, our financial position and our results of operations.

The other shareholders of Unitel have claimed that they believe that Pharol’s sale of a minority interest in Africatel to our company did not comply with the Unitel shareholders’ agreement.

The Unitel shareholders’ agreement provides a right of first refusal to the other shareholders of Unitel if any shareholder desires to transfer any or all of its shares of Unitel, other than transfers to certain affiliated companies. This agreement also provides that if any shareholder breaches a material obligation under the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, the other shareholders will have a right to purchase the breaching shareholder’s stake in Unitel at its net asset value.

On March 14, 2016, the other shareholders of Unitel initiated an arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures, claiming that Pharol’s sale of a minority interest in Africatel to our company did not comply with the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. The other shareholders of Unitel had previously made the same claim as a counterclaim in the arbitration started by PT Ventures on October 13, 2015, but then withdrew that counterclaim. PT Ventures disputes the other shareholders’ interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, and we believe that the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement apply only to a transfer of Unitel shares by PT Ventures itself.

PT Ventures is seeking to consolidate this arbitration proceeding with the separate arbitration proceeding brought by PT Ventures against the other shareholders of Unitel. We intend to defend against the allegation by

Unitel’s other shareholders vigorously. If a binding decision by the arbitral tribunal were rendered ruling in favor of the interpretation of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement proposed by the other Unitel shareholder, PT Ventures could be required to sell its interest in Unitel for a value significantly lower than the amount that we record in our financial statements with respect to our indirect investment in Unitel. The sale of PT Ventures’ interest in Unitel in these circumstances could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

The other shareholders of Unitel have prevented PT Ventures from exercising its rights to appoint the chief executive officer and a majority of the board of directors of Unitel.

Under the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, PT Ventures is entitled to appoint three of the five members of Unitel’s board of directors and its chief executive officer. Under the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, the appointment of the chief executive officer of Unitel is subject to the approval of the holders of 75% of Unitel’s shares. However, the other shareholders of Unitel have failed to vote to elect the directors nominated by PT Ventures at Unitel’s shareholders’ meetings, and as a result, PT Ventures’ representation on Unitel’s board of directors was reduced to a single director in June 2006, and the chief executive officer of Unitel has not been PT Ventures’ appointee since June 2006.

On July 22, 2014, the only member of Unitel’s board of directors that had been appointed by PT Ventures resigned from his position, and the other shareholders of Unitel have not permitted PT Ventures to appoint a replacement. In November 2014, the other shareholders of Unitel stated to PT Ventures that its rights as a shareholder of Unitel had been purportedly suspended in October 2012, although these other shareholders have not indicated any legal basis for this alleged suspension. At a general shareholders meeting of Unitel held on December 15, 2014, an election of members of the board of directors of Unitel was held. At this meeting, Unitel’s other shareholders claimed that PT Ventures was not entitled to vote as a result of the alleged suspension of its rights as a shareholder of Unitel in October 2012, and they refused to elect the member nominated by PT Ventures to Unitel’s board of directors. As of the date of this annual report, no nominee of PT Ventures serves on the Unitel board of directors.

On October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other shareholders of Unitel as a result of the violation by those shareholders of a variety of provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, including the provisions entitling PT Ventures to nominate the majority of the members of the board of directors of Unitel and its chief executive officer. Vidatel Ltd., one of the other shareholders, presented its answer to PT Ventures’ request for arbitration on January 8, 2016. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on April 14, 2016 and the proceedings are ongoing.

Unitel has granted loans to a related party and entered into a management contract with a third-party without the approval of PT Ventures.

Under the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, the shareholders of Unitel and their affiliates are not permitted to enter into any contracts with Unitel unless the contracts are approved by a resolution of Unitel’s board of directors adopted by at least four members of its board of directors. As a result of the inability of PT Ventures to appoint members of the Unitel board of directors, PT Ventures is unable to effectively exercise its implied veto right over related party transactions of Unitel.

Between May and October 2012, Unitel made disbursements to Unitel International Holdings B.V. of €178.9 million (R$760.4 million) and US$35.0 million (R$136.7 million) under a “Facility Agreement” entered into between Unitel and Unitel International Holdings B.V., or Unitel Holdings. Unitel Holdings is controlled by Mrs. Isabel dos Santos, an indirect shareholder of Unitel and a member of the board of directors of Unitel. PT Ventures abstained when theaudited consolidated financial statements of Unitel that included these transactions were approved by the other Unitel shareholders at a shareholders meeting.

In addition, Unitel has recognized the payment of a management fee of US$155.7 million (R$608.0 million) payable to a third-party in its individual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 prepared in accordance with Angolan GAAP.

In September and November 2015, PT Ventures commenced litigation in the British Virgin Island and the Netherlands against Unitel Holdings and other entities concerning the related party transactions with Unitel.

Despite requests, PT Ventures has been unable to obtain documents and other information concerning transactions between Unitel and Unitel International Holdings B.V., including any transactions that Unitel may have entered into in addition to those described above from 2012 and 2013. We have evidence that Unitel made additional loans to related parties in 2013 that were not approved in accordance with the terms of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. We have not been able to obtain information with regard to the existence of similar transactions conducted in 2014 and 2015.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to prevent Unitel from taking actions that should require the approval of the members of the Unitel board of directors nominated by PT Ventures, including approving related party transactions with the other shareholders of Unitel that we believe are detrimental to the financial condition and results of operations of Unitel. The use of the resources of Unitel in this manner could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and results of operations of Unitel and therefore the value of our investment in Unitel.

On October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other shareholders of Unitel as a result of the violation by those shareholders of a variety of provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, including the provisions that would have entitled PT Ventures to veto these related party transactions.

The other shareholders of Unitel have attempted to dilute our indirect ownership of Unitel through a capital increase in which we could be technically unable to participate, and have called shareholders’ meetings at which they have indicated the desire to unilaterally amend the by-laws of Unitel and the Unitel shareholders’ agreement.

At a general shareholders meeting of Unitel held on December 15, 2014, the other shareholders of Unitel voted to increase Unitel’s share capital and alter the nominal value of its shares. The details of this capital increase are obscure to us as they were not included in the prior notice for this meeting nor were they discussed in detail during this meeting. Additional details of this capital increase have been included in draft minutes of this meeting provided to PT Ventures and it appears that, although PT Ventures has determined to subscribe to itspro rata share of this capital increase to avoid dilution of its interest in Unitel, payment of the subscription price may be proposed under conditions that would not permit PT Ventures to obtain the necessary foreign exchange approvals prior to the date on which payment would be due. PT Ventures has filed a suit in Angolan court to annul the approval of the Unitel capital increase at this shareholders’ meeting.

The agenda of this general shareholders meeting of Unitel included amendments to Unitel’s by-laws and purported amendments to Unitel shareholders’ agreement, in addition to other matters that may have been raised at the shareholders’ meeting itself, which included investments by Unitel in Zimbabwe and a study in order to implement a corporate reorganization of Unitel. We have not been provided of the details of the proposed by-law amendments nor of any purported amendments to the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. The December 15, 2014 meeting was suspended without any action taken on these items. PT Ventures has filed a suit in Angolan court to annul all resolutions taken during this general shareholders meeting, including the approval of investments by Unitel in Zimbabwe and a study in order to implement a corporate reorganization of Unitel.

We cannot assess the impact to Unitel or our company of the matters considered at the December 15, 2014 general shareholders’ meeting of Unitel or the proposed amendments to Unitel’s by-laws and purported amendments to the Unitel shareholders’ agreement as we have not been provided with sufficient details to appropriately analyze these matters. We note that there appears to be no legal authority for the other shareholders of Unitel to amend the Unitel shareholders’ agreement through actions taken at a general meeting of shareholders, as this agreement is an agreement among the parties thereto. Should the other shareholders approve actions detrimental to Unitel or our investment in Unitel, these actions could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and results of operations of Unitel and therefore the value of our investment in Unitel.

Unitel’s concession to operate in Angola has expired and has not yet been renewed.

Unitel’s concession to provide mobile telecommunications services in Angola expired in April 2012. We cannot provide you with any assurances regarding the terms under which the Angolan National Institute of Telecommunications (Instituto Angolano das Comunicações), or INACOM, would grant a renewal of this concession, if at all. A failure of Unitel to obtain a renewal of this concession could have a material adverse effect on the ability of Unitel to continue to provide mobile telecommunications services in Angola, which would have a material adverse effect on Unitel’s financial position and results of operations and the value of our investment in Unitel.

Adverse political, economic and legal conditions in the African and Asian countries in which we have acquired investments may hinder our ability to receive dividends from our African and Asian subsidiaries and investments.

The governments of many of the African and Asian countries in which we have investments have historically exercised, and continue to exercise, significant influence over their respective economies and legal systems. Countries in which we have investments may enact legal or regulatory measures that restrict the ability of our subsidiaries and investees to make dividend payments to us. Similarly, adverse political or economic conditions in these countries may hinder our ability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries and investees. Historically, Pharol has received dividends from the African and Asian subsidiaries and investees that we have acquired, however, a limitation on our ability to receive a material portion of those dividends could adversely affect our cash flows and liquidity.

In addition, our investments in these regions are exposed to political and economic risks that include, but are not limited to, exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, inflation and restrictive economic policies and regulatory risks that include, but are not limited to, the process for the renewal of licenses and the evolution of regulated retail and wholesale tariffs. In addition, our ventures in African and Asian markets face risks associated with increasing competition, including due to the entrance of new competitors and the rapid development of new technologies.

The development of partnerships in these markets raises risks related to the ability of the partners to jointly operate the assets. Any inability of our company and our partners to operate these assets may have a negative impact on our strategy and all of these risks may have material effects on our results of operations.annual report.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement,influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.condition and the market prices of our Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

We areOi is a Brazilian corporation, and a majoritysubstantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently intervenes inexercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, increasesamong other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports, among other things.imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, or by otherespecially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, such as:including:

 

political instability;

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

 

devaluations and other currency fluctuations;

economic, political or social instability;

 

inflation;

fluctuating exchange rates;

 

price instability;

inflation;

 

interest rates;rates and monetary policies;

 

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

energy shortages;policy;

 

exchange controls;controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

 

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

 

monetary policy;

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

 

tax policy;

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

 

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil, including with respect to alleged unethical or illegal conduct of certain figures in the Brazilian government and legislators, which are currently under investigation.Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether possiblethe Brazilian federal government will implement changes into the policies, regulations or rulesstandards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertaintiesuncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers. issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Ongoing political instability has adversely affected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The PresidentBrazilian economy has been affected by political events in Brazil, which have also affected the confidence of Brazil has considerable power to determine governmental policiesinvestors and actions that relate tothe public in general, adversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and consequently, affectheightening the operations and financial performancevolatility of businesses such as our company. We can offer no assurances that the policies that may be implementedsecurities issued by the Brazilian federal or state governments will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.companies.

In addition, protests, strikes and corruption scandals have led to a fall in confidence and a political crisis. For example, Brazilian markets have been experiencingalso experienced heightened volatility due to the uncertainties derived from the ongoing “Lava Jato” investigation, which is beinginvestigations conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor,Police and its impact onthe Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. MembersNumerous members of the Brazilian federal government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of certain Brazilianlarge state-owned and private and state-owned companies, have faced allegationsbeen convicted of political corruption. These government officials and senior officers allegedly acceptedcorruption related to bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by major state-owned companiesthe government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies. The profitscompanies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of the main political parties in Brazil that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, as well asand served to personally enrichfurther the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery scheme.schemes. As a result, of the ongoing “Lava Jato” investigation, a number of senior politicians, including congressmanformer president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested. arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The potential outcome of the “Lava Jato” investigationthese investigations is uncertain, but itthey have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has alreadyand may continue to adversely affected the Brazilian markets and trading prices of securities issued by Brazilian issuers.affect us. We cannot predict whether the “Lava Jato” investigationongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to furtherheightened economic and political and economic instability orvolatility in Brazil, nor whether new allegationsinvestigations against government officials politicians and/or otherofficers of private companies in Brazil will ariseoccur in the future.

Furthermore,In addition, in October 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the total number of senators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office at the beginning of 2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on December 2, 2015,January 1, 2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as well as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of Brazilian Congress opened impeachment proceedings against Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff for allegedly breaking federal budget laws during her re-election campaign in 2014. On May 12, 2016, the Brazilian Congress voted to suspend President Rousseff from office for a period of up to 180 days during which time the Brazilian Senate will conduct an impeachment trial. Vice-President Michel Temer will serve as actingsecurities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil during this period.has the power to determine policies and issue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy that affect the operations and financial performance of companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies the outcome of President Rousseff’s impeachment trialnewly elected president will adopt or itsif these policies or changes in current policies may have an adverse effect on us or the Brazilian economy. Moreover, there is strong popular pressure and several legal and administrative proceedings for the revocation of the mandate or resignation of the Head of the Brazilian House of Representatives, which have led to further uncertainties. The political crisis prompted by these investigations and proceedings could worsen the economic conditions

Fluctuations in Brazil and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Depreciation of therealexchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or indexedlinked to foreign currencies.

DuringSince 1999, exchange rates for the four decades prior to 1999,real have been set by the Brazilian Central Bank periodically devalued the Brazilian currency. Throughout this period, the Brazilian government implemented various economic plans and used various exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations (such as daily and monthly adjustments)market, i.e., exchange controls, dual exchange rate markets and a floating exchange rate system. Since 1999,Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rates have been set byrate between the market.real, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal andhas experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated against the U.S. dollar has varied significantly in recent years. For example,by 47.1% during 2015. During 2016, thereal/U.S. dollar exchange rate increased from R$1.9554 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2000 to R$3.5333 on December 31, 2002. Therealappreciated against the U.S. dollar by 4.3% during 2010,16.5% and hasthereal depreciated by 8.9% against the U.S. dollar during 2012, by 14.6% during 2013, by 13.4% during 20141.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018, and by 47.1% during 2015. In

4.0% in 2019.

addition, therealappreciated against the Euro by 10.4% during 2010, and has depreciated by 10.7% against the Euro during 2012, by 19.7% during 2013, was substantially unchanged during 2014 and depreciated by 31.7% in 2015.

A significant amount of our financial liabilities are denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, primarily U.S. dollars and Euros. As of December 31, 2015,2019, R$47,37218,294 million, or 57.8%, of our total consolidated financial indebtednessborrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal., excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$9,521 million, or 52.2%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated PIK Toggle Notes and Euro-denominated long-term debt and foreign currency loans,export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the balance of our fair value adjustment as a consequence of the gross debt balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Historically, we

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have maintained currency swapseffects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and non-deliverable forwards to manageinterest expenses, negatively affecting our exposure to mostresults of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our foreign currency debt. During 2016, in connection with our consideration of potential plans to restructure our indebtedness,financial liabilities, we havedo not rolled over our non-deliverable forwards and have selectively settled several of our long-term currency swaps. As a result, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations has increased substantially. If we are able to restructure our indebtedness in a manner satisfactory to our company, we expect the increased exposure to foreign currency fluctuations to be temporary. In the event that these expectations are not met, the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on our debt instruments could have a material adverseanticipate any substantial effect on our financial condition and resultsliquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of operations.

the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our capital expenditures and operating leases require us to acquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in or linked to foreign currencies, some of which are financed by liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar and the Euro.dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to our capital expenditures against risks related to movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the U.S. dollar, or the Euro, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the 17.1% depreciation of thereal during 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy limited inflation and allowed the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Brazilian Central Bank to reduce the SELIC rate (the Brazilian Central Bank’s overnight rate) by 0.50% during 2018, ending 2018 at 6.5%. As of December 31, 2019, the SELIC rate was 4.5%.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019 is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated capital expenditure and operating lease costs, although we do not anticipate any substantial effects in the short-term as we generally fix the exchange rates applicable to our network equipment orders at the time that these orders are placed and we have hedged our U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. A prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to implement our capital expenditure program and increase our operating costs, adversely affect our operating results and overall financial performance.

Appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar may lead to a deterioration of the country’s current account and the balance of payments, as well as to a dampening of export-driven growth. Any such appreciation could reduce the competitiveness of Brazilian exports and adversely affect net sales and cash flows from exports. Depreciation of thereal relative to the U.S. dollar could create additional inflationary pressures in Brazil by increasing the price of imported products, and requiring recessionarywhich may result in the adoption of deflationary government policies, including tighter monetary policy. On the other hand, appreciationpolicies. The sharp depreciation of thereal againstin relation to the U.S. dollar may leadgenerate inflation and governmental measures to a deteriorationfight possible inflationary outbreaks, including the increase in interest rates, which reduces the purchasing power of consumers and raises the country’s current accountcost in the credit market. Any such macroeconomic effects could adversely affect our net operating revenues and balance of payments, as well as to a dampening of export-driven growth.our overall financial performance.

If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our margins and our ability to access foreign financial markets may be reduced. GovernmentInflation and government measures to curb inflation may have adverse effects on the Brazilian economy, the Brazilian securities market and our business and results of operations.

In the past, Brazil has in the past, experienced extremely high rates of inflation, with annual rates of inflation reaching as high as 2,708% in 1993 and 1,093% in 1994.inflation. Inflation, and some of the Brazilian government’s measures taken in an attemptpolicies adopted to curb inflationinflationary pressures and uncertainties regarding possible future governmental intervention have had and are expected to continue to have significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy.

Since the introduction of thereal in 1994, Brazil’s inflation rate has been substantially lower than in previous periods. However, actions taken in an effort to control inflation, coupled with speculation about possible future governmental actions,economy generally, and have contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities market. More recently, Brazil’s rates of inflation, as measured by the General Market Price Index — Internal Availability (Índice Geral de Preços — Disponibilidade Interna), or IGP-DI, published by Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, were 5.0% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 5.5% in 2013, 3.8% in 2014 and 10.7% in 2015. capital markets.

According to the Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Ampliado), or IPCA, published by the Brazilian Institute forof Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or IBGE, the Brazilian consumer price inflation rates were 6.5%10.7% during 2015, 6.3% during 2016, 3.0% during 2017, 3.8% during 2018 and 4.3% during 2019. Brazil may experience high levels of inflation in 2011, 5.8%the future and inflationary pressures may lead to the Brazilian government’s intervening in 2012, 5.9%the economy and introducing policies that could harm our business and the price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

As of the date of this annual report, fixed broadband and mobile service providers use the General Market Price Index — Internal Availability (Índice Geral de Preços — Disponibilidade Interna), orIGP-DI, to adjust their prices. TheIGP-DI is an inflation index developed by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, a private organization. TheIGP-DI index was 10.7% during 2015, 7.2% during 2016, (0.42)% during 2017, 7.1% during 2018 and 7.7% during 2019.

Since 2006, rates for fixed-line services have been indexed to the Telecommunication Services Index (Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações), or IST, adjusted by a productivity factor, which is defined by ANATEL Resolution 507/2008. The IST is an index composed of other domestic price indexes (including the IPCA, theIGP-DI and the General Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços ao Mercado), orIGP-M, published by FGV, among others) that is intended to reflect the telecommunications industry’s operating costs. As a result, this index serves to reduce potential discrepancies between our industry’s revenue and costs, and thus reduce the apparent adverse effects of inflation on our operations. The productivity factor, pursuant to which ANATEL is authorized to adjust fee rates, is calculated based on a compensation index established by ANATEL to incentivize operational efficiency and to share related gains in 2013, 6.4%earnings from fixed line services with customers through fee rate adjustments. The IST is calculated based on a12-month period average. This may cause increases in 2014 and 10.7% in 2015.our revenues above or below our costs (including salaries), with potentially adverse impacts on our profitability.

If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our costs may increase and our operating and net margins may decrease. Although ANATEL regulations provide for annual price increases for most of our services in Brazil, such increases are linked to inflation indices, discounted by increases in our productivity. During periods of rapid increases in inflation, the price increases for our services may not be sufficient to cover our additional costs and we may be adversely affected by the lag in time between the incurrence of increased costs and the receipt of revenues resulting from the annual price increases. Inflationary pressures may also curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and may lead to further government intervention in the economy, including the introduction of government policies that may adversely affect the overall performance of the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in interest rates could increase the cost of servicing our debt and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

Our financial expenses are affected by changes in the interest rates that apply to our floating rate debt. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had, among other consolidated debt obligations, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, R$8,95013,087 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR,variable interest rates, including R$6,3619,140 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing and debentures that were subject to the Interbank Certificate of Deposit (Certificado de DepóDepósito InterbancáInterbancário), or CDI, rate, an interbank rate, and R$3,1513,947 million of loansborrowings and financings and debenturesfinancing that were subject to the Long-Term Interest Rate (Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo), or TJLP, a long-term interest rate,rate. As of December 31, 2019, we had, among other consolidated debt obligations, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, R$1,5159,148 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to variable interest rates, including R$4,695 million of borrowings and financing and debentures that were subject to the IPCA.CDI rate, and R$3,946 million of borrowings and financing that were subject to the TJLP.

The TJLP includes an inflation factor and is determined quarterly by the National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional). In particular, the TJLP and the CDI rate have fluctuated significantly in the past in response to the expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, inflation, Brazilian government policies and other factors. For example, the CDI increasedrate decreased from 6.90% per annum as of December 31, 2012 to 9.77% per annum as of December 31, 2013, increased to 11.57% per annum as of December 31, 2014 and increased to 14.13% per annum as of December 31, 2015. A significant increase in any2015, and decreased to 13.63% per annum as of these interest rates, particularly the CDI rate, could adversely affect our financial expensesDecember 31, 2016, 6.89% per annum as of December 31, 2017, 6.40% per annum as of December 31, 2018 and negatively affect our overall financial performance.4.40% per annum as of December 31, 2019.

The market value of securities issued by Brazilian companies is influenced by the perception of risk in Brazil and other countries, which may have a negative effect on the trading price of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs and may restrict our access to international capital markets.

Economic and market conditions in other countries and regions, including the United States, the European Union and emerging market countries, may affect to varying degrees the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Although economic conditions in these countries and regions may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers, the availability of credit in Brazil and the amount of foreign investment in Brazil. Crises in the European Union, the United States and emerging market countries have at times resulted in significant outflows of funds from Brazil and may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including our company. This could materially and adversely affect the market price of our securities, and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.

Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may impair our ability to service certain debt obligations.

Brazilian law provides that whenever there exists, or there is a serious risk of, a material imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments, the Brazilian government may impose restrictions for a limited period of time on the remittance to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil as well as on the conversion of therealinto foreign currencies. The Brazilian government imposed such a restriction on remittances for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990. The Brazilian government may in the future restrict companies from paying amounts denominated in foreign currency or require that any such payment be made inreais. Many factors could affect the likelihood of the Brazilian government imposing such exchange control restrictions, including the extent of Brazil’s foreign currency reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the size of Brazil’s debt service burden relative to the economy as a whole, and political constraints to which Brazil may be subject. There can be no certainty that the Brazilian government will not take such measures in the future.

A more restrictive policy could increase the cost of servicing, and thereby reduce our ability to pay, our foreign currency-denominated debt obligations and other liabilities. As of December 31, 2015, our foreign-currency denominated debt was R$47,372 million and represented 78.4% of our consolidated indebtedness. If we fail to make payments under any of these obligations, we will be in default under those obligations, which could reduce our liquidity as well as the market price of our common shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

In addition, a more restrictive policy could hinder or prevent the Brazilian custodian of the common shares and preferred shares underlying our ADSs or holders who have exchanged our ADSs for the underlying common shares or preferred shares from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such shares into U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad. In such an event, the Brazilian custodian for our common shares and preferred shares will hold thereais that it cannot convert for the account of holders of our ADSs who have not been paid. Neither the custodian nor The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of our ADS programs, which we refer to as the depositary, will be required to invest thereais or be liable for any interest.

Risks Relating to Ourthe Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs

Holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.

According to our Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, weOi must generally pay ourits shareholders at least 25% of ourOi’s consolidated annual net income as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity, as calculated and adjusted underin accordance with the Brazilian GAAP.Corporate Law. This adjusted net income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise retained as allowed under the Brazilian GAAPCorporate Law and Oi’sby-laws and may not be available to be paid as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity. Holders of our common sharesCommon Shares or Common ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity in any given year due to the dividend preference of our preferred shares.Preferred Shares. Additionally, the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law allows a publicly traded company like oursOi to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any particular year if ourOi’s board of directors informs ourOi’s shareholders at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of ourOi’s financial condition or cash availability. Holdersavailability and subject to approval of our preferred sharesthe general shareholders’ meeting. In addition, the members of Oi’s fiscal council must issue an opinion with respect to the suspension of the mandatory distribution of dividends and Oi’s board of directors must submit to the CVM the justification for such suspension.

Moreover, under the RJ Plan, Oi and the other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or Preferred ADSs may not receive anypaying dividends, or interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until February 5, 2024. After February 5, 2024, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if Oi meets a certain financial ratio, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.” There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits (as defined in any given year if our boardthe RJ Plan). The restrictions of directors makes such a determination or if our operations failthe payment of dividends and other distributions described in this paragraph are subject to generate net income.certain exceptions, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

Our preferred shares and Preferred ADSs have limited voting rights and are not entitled to vote to approve corporate transactions, including mergers or consolidationsHolders of our company with other companies, or the declaration of dividends.

Under the Brazilian Corporation Law and our by-laws, holders of our preferred shares and, consequently, our Preferred ADSs are not entitled to attend shareholders’ meetings and may only vote at meetings of our shareholders, except in very limited circumstances. These limited circumstances directly relate to key rights ofthrough the holders of preferred shares, such as modifying basic terms of our preferred shares or creating a new class of preferred shares with superior rights. Holders of preferred shares without voting rights are entitled to elect one member and his or her respective alternate to our board of directors and our fiscal council. Holders of our preferred shares and Preferred ADSs are not entitled to vote to approve corporate transactions, including mergers or consolidations of our company with other companies, or the declaration of dividends. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Description of Our Company’s By-laws—Voting Rights.”

Holders of our ADSs may find it difficult to exercise their voting rights at our shareholders’ meetings.depositary.

Under Brazilian law, only shareholders registered as such in ourOi’s corporate books may attend ourOi’s shareholders’ meetings. All common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying our ADSs are registered in the name of the depositary. ADS holdersConsequently, a holder of ADSs is not entitled to attend Oi’s shareholders’ meetings. Holders of ADSs may exercise the voting rights with respect to our common sharesCommon Shares and the limited voting rights with respect to our preferred sharesPreferred Shares represented by our ADSs only in accordance with the applicable deposit agreementsagreement relating to ourthe ADSs. There are practical limitations upon the ability of the ADS holders of ADSs to exercise their voting rights due to the additional steps involved in communicating with ADS holders.holders of ADSs. For example, we areOi is required to publish a notice of ourOi’s shareholders’ meetings in certain newspapers in Brazil. To the extent that holders of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares are entitled to vote at a shareholders’ meeting, they will be able to exercise their voting rights by attending the meeting in person or voting by proxy. By contrast, holders of the ADSs maywill receive notice of a shareholders’ meeting by mail from the depositary if we notifyfollowing Oi’s notification to the depositary of the shareholders’

meeting and Oi’s request that the depositary to inform ADS holders of ADSs of the shareholders’ meeting. To exercise their voting rights, ADS holders of ADSs must instruct the depositary on a timely basis. This noticed voting process will take longer for ADS holders of ADSs than for holders of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares.Preferred Shares. If the depositary fails to receive timely voting instructions for all or part of our ADSs, the depositary will assume that the holders of those ADSs are instructing it to give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by us to vote their ADSs, except in limited circumstances.

In the circumstances in which

We cannot assure you that holders of our ADSs have voting rights, they may notwill receive the voting materials in time to ensure that such holders can instruct the depositary to vote our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying their ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions of the holders of our ADSs or for the manner of carrying out those voting instructions. Accordingly, holders of our ADSs may not be able to exercise voting rights, and they will have no recourse if the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying their ADSs are not voted as requested.

Holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States may not be entitled to the sameparticipate in future preemptive rights as Brazilian shareholders have, pursuant to Brazilian legislation, in the subscriptionofferings of shares resulting from capital increases made by us.Common Shares or Preferred Shares.

Under Brazilian law, if weOi offers to issue new shares in exchange for cash or assets as part of a capital increase, subject to certain exceptions, weOi generally must grant ourits shareholders preemptive rights at the timeright to purchase a sufficient number of the subscription ofoffered shares corresponding to their respective interest in our share capital, allowing them to maintain their existing shareholdingownership percentage. WeRights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights. Oi may not legally be permitted to allow holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increase unless either (1) we fileOi files a registration statement for anwith the SEC with respect to that offering of shares, resulting from theas Oi did for its most recent capital increase, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or (2) thethat offering of shares resulting from the capital increase qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. At the time of any future capital increase, weOi will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement for an offering of shares with the SEC and any other factors that we considerOi considers important in determining whether to file such a registration statement. WeOi is not obligated to file a registration statement in connection with any future capital increase, and Oi cannot assure the holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States that weit will file a registration statement with the SEC to allow them to participate in any of our capital increases.a preemptive rights offering. As a result, the equity interest of such holders in our companyOi may be diluted.

If holders of our ADSs exchange them for common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares,Preferred Shares, they may risk temporarily losing, or being limited in, the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.

The Brazilian custodian for the common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying our ADSs must obtainhas obtained an electronic registration number with the Brazilian Central Bank to allow the depositary to remit U.S. dollars abroad. ADS holders benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank obtained by the custodian for the depositary, which permits it to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares into U.S. dollars and remit the proceeds of such conversion abroad. If holders of our ADSs decide to exchange them for the underlying common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares,Preferred Shares, they will only be entitledrequired to rely onappoint a Brazilian financial institution to act as their legal representative who shall be responsible, among other things, for keeping and updating the custodian’s certificateinvestors’ certificates of registrationregistrations with the Brazilian Central Bank, for five business days after the date of the exchange. Thereafter, theyas provided in CMN Resolution No. 4,373. Investors will only be unableable to remit U.S. dollars abroad unless they obtain aif the relevant new electronic certificate of foreign capital registration in connection with the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares, whichPreferred Shares is previously obtained. If such investors fail to obtain or update the relevant certificates of registration, it may result in additional expenses and may cause delays in receiving distributions. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls.”

Also,In addition, if holders of our ADSs that exchange our ADSs for our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations,Preferred Shares, generally they will generallymay be subject to a less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distribution on and the proceeds from any sale of, our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares.Preferred Shares. See “Item 10. Additional information—Exchange Controls” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Holders of our ADSs may face difficulties in protecting their interests because, as a Brazilian company, we are subject to different corporate rules and regulations and our shareholders may have fewer and less well-defined rights.

Holders of our ADSs are not direct shareholders of our company and are unable to enforce the rights of shareholders under our by-laws and the Brazilian Corporation Law.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our by-laws and the Brazilian Corporation Law, which differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, such as the State of Delaware or New York, or elsewhere outside Brazil. Even if a holder of our ADSs surrenders its ADSs and becomes a direct shareholder, its rights as a holder of our common shares or preferred shares under the Brazilian Corporation Law to protect its interests relative to actions by our board of directors may be fewer and less well-defined than under the laws of those other jurisdictions.

Although insider trading and price manipulation are crimes under Brazilian law, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets or the markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States and certain other countries, which may put holders of our common shares, preferred shares and ADSs at a potential disadvantage. Corporate disclosures also may be less complete or informative than those of a public company in the United States or in certain other countries.

Brazilian bankruptcy laws may be less favorable to you than bankruptcy and insolvency laws in other jurisdictions.

If we are unable to pay our indebtedness, then we may become subject to bankruptcy proceedings in Brazil. The bankruptcy laws of Brazil currently in effect are significantly different from, and may be less favorable to creditors than, those of certain other jurisdictions. Any judgment obtained against us in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations under our debt instruments normally would be expressed in thereal equivalent of the U.S. dollar amount of such sum at the exchange rate in effect (1) on the date of actual payment, (2) on the date on which such judgment is rendered, or (3) on the date on which collection or enforcement proceedings are started against us. Consequently, in the event of our bankruptcy, all of our debt obligations that are denominated in foreign currency, will be converted intoreais at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of declaration of our bankruptcy by the court.

We are exempt from some of the corporate governance requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

We are a foreign private issuer, as defined by the SEC for purposes of the Exchange Act. As a result, for so long as we remain a foreign private issuer, we will be exempt from, and you will not be provided with the benefits of, some of the corporate governance requirements of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. We are permitted to follow practice in Brazil in lieu of the provisions of the NYSE’s corporate governance rules, except that:

we are required to have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act;

we are required to disclose any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under NYSE listing standards;

our chief executive officer is obligated to promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any of our executive officers becomes aware of any non-compliance with any applicable provisions of the NYSE corporate governance rules; and

we must submit an executed written affirmation annually to the NYSE. In addition, we must submit an interim written affirmation as and when required by the interim written affirmation form specified by the NYSE.

The standards applicable to us are considerably different than the standards applied to U.S. domestic issuers. AlthoughRule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act generally requires that a listed company have an audit committee of

its board of directors composed solely of independent directors, as a foreign private issuer, we are relying on a general exemption from this requirement that is available to us as a result of the features of Brazilian law applicable to our fiscal council. In addition, we are not required to, among other things:

have a majority of independent members of our board of directors;

have a compensation committee or a nominating or corporate governance committee of our board of directors;

have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only non-management directors; or

have at least one executive session of solely independent directors each year.

We intend to rely on some or all of these exemptions. As a result, you will not be provided with the benefits of certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar antibribery laws outside of the United States.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC, increased enforcement activity by non-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Holders of our ADSs may face difficulties in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.

We are organizedOi is incorporated as a corporation under the laws of Brazil and substantially all of the members of our board of directors, our executive officers and our independent registered public accountants reside or are based in Brazil. The vast majority of ourOi’s assets and those of these other persons are located in Brazil. In addition, all of Oi’s directors and executive officers reside outside the United States and all or a significant portion of the assets of such persons may be located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of our ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil upon such persons, or to enforce against us or these othersuch persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. In addition, because substantially all of our assets and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us or any of our directors or officers may not be collectible within the United States. Because judgments of U.S. courts, forincluding judgments predicated upon the civil liabilities based uponliability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests inor the caselaws of actions by us or our board of directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.such other jurisdictions.

Holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares will be subject to, and holders of ADSs could be subject to, Brazilian income tax laws may have an adverse impact on the taxes applicable to the dispositioncapital gains from sales of our common shares, preferred shares andCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

According to Article 26 of Brazilian Law No. 10,833, enacted on December 29, 10,833/2003, if a nonresident ofholder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or aNon-Brazilian Holder, disposes of assets located in Brazil, the transaction will be subject to taxation in Brazil, even if such disposition occurs outside Brazil or if such disposition is made to another nonresident.Non-Brazilian Holder. Accordingly, on the disposition of common shares or preferred shares, which are considered assets located in Brazil, theNon-Brazilian Holder will be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains,” regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or abroad and with a Brazilian resident or not. A disposition of our ADSs, between nonresidents, however, involves the disposal of anon-Brazilian asset, andwhich in principle is currentlyshould not be subject to taxation in Brazil. Nevertheless, in the event that the concept of “disposition of assets”“assets located in Brazil” is interpreted to include the disposition between nonresidents of assets located outside Brazil,our ADSs, this tax law could result in the imposition of withholding taxes inon the event of a disposition of our ADSs made by nonresidents of Brazil.Non-Brazilian Holders. Due to the fact that, as of the date of this annual report, Article 26 of Brazilian Law No. 10,833/2003 has no judicial guidance as to its application to ADSs, we are unable to predict whether anwhich interpretation applying such tax laws to dispositions of our ADSs between nonresidents couldwould ultimately prevail in Brazilian courts. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.Considerations —Taxation of Gains.

We believe we wereOi believes that it was not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2015, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our American depository shares or ordinary shares.2019.

WeOi will be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, in any taxable year if either: (1) 50% or more of the fair market value of our gross assets (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) for the taxable year produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, or (2) 75% or more of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income. As a publicly traded foreign corporation, we intendOi intends for this purpose to treat the aggregate fair market value of our gross assets as being equal to the aggregate value of our outstanding stock plus the total amount of our liabilities (“market capitalization”) and to treat the excess of the fair market value of our assets over their book value as a nonpassive asset to the extent attributable to our nonpassive income. Based on the market price of our common sharesthe Common Shares and preferred sharesthe Preferred Shares and the composition of our assets, we believe we wereOi believes that it was not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2015. Furthermore, unless the value of our common shares and preferred shares increases and/or we invest a substantial amount of our cash and other passive assets in assets2019, although Oi believes that produce active income, there is a significant risk we will beit was a PFIC for ourthe taxable year ended December 31, 2018. Nevertheless, because PFIC status is determined annually based on Oi’s income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether Oi will be characterized as a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2016. The application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and we must make a separate determination2020, or for any subsequent year, until after the close of each taxable year as to whether we werethe year. Furthermore, because Oi determines the value of its gross assets based on the Market Capitalization test, a decline in the value of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares may result in Oi becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Oi will not be considered a PFIC for suchany taxable year. Because we believe we

If contrary to Oi’s belief, Oi were characterized as a PFIC for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2015,2019, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to a U.S. investor who holds our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs with respect to any “excess distribution” received from usOi and any gain from a sale or other disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs, and U.S. investors also may be subject to additional reporting obligations with respect to our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs. We doIn such case, Oi does not intend to provide the information necessary for thea U.S. investor to make a qualified electing fund election with respect to our common shares, preferred sharesthe Common Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation – U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations – Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

The relative volatility and illiquidityIf a United States person is treated as owning at least 10% of Oi’s shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a United States person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the Brazilian securitiesvalue or voting power of Oi’s shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). If United States shareholders own (or are treated as owning) more than 50% of the value or voting power of Oi’s shares, Oi would (and ournon-U.S. subsidiaries could) be treated as controlled foreign corporations. In addition, if our group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation). A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to report annually and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangiblelow-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject you to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to your U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist investors in determining whether any of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries are treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether such investor is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such controlled foreign corporations or furnish to any United States shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. Certain of our shareholders may be United States shareholders. The determination of controlled foreign corporation status is complex and includes attribution rules, the application of which is not entirely certain. A United States investor should consult its advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to an investment in Oi’s Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Trading onover-the-counter markets may adversely affect holders of our common shares, preferred sharesbe volatile and ADSs.

The Brazilian securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. The BM&FBOVESPA,sporadic, which is the principal Brazilian stock exchange, had a market capitalization of R$1.9 trillion (US$490 billion) as of December 31, 2015 and an average daily trading volume of R$6.8 billion (US$2.1 billion) for 2015. In comparison, aggregate market capitalization of the companies (including U.S. and non-U.S. companies) listed on the NYSE was US$17.8 trillion as of December 31, 2015 and the NYSE recorded an average daily trading volume of US$64.0 billion for 2015. There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities markets. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented approximately 51% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA as of December 31, 2015. The ten most widely traded stocks in terms of trading volume accounted for approximately 44% of all shares traded on the BM&FBOVESPA in 2015. These market characteristics may substantially limit the ability of holders of our ADSs to sell the preferred shares underlying our ADSs at a price and at a time when they wish to do so and, as a result, could negatively impactdepress the market price of ourthe Preferred ADSs themselves.

The imposition of IOF taxes may indirectly influence the price and volatility of our common shares, preferred shares andmake it difficult for holders to resell Oi’s Preferred ADSs.

Brazilian law imposesOn June 21, 2016, the TaxPreferred ADSs were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. On June 23, 2016, OTC Markets Group, Inc. began publishing quotations for the Preferred ADS in the “pink sheets” under the trading symbol OIBRQ. Trading in stock quoted on Foreign Exchange Transactions,over the counter markets is often thin, volatile, and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of the Preferred ADSs for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the over the counter markets are not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the over the counter markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on other stock exchanges such as the NYSE, the NASDAQ Stock Market or the IOF/Exchange Tax, on the conversionAmerican Stock Exchange. Accordingly, holders ofreais into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency intoreais. Brazilian law also imposes the Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and Securities, or the IOF/Securities Tax, due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange. Preferred ADSs may have difficulty reselling such securities.

In October 2009, the Brazilian government imposed the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of 2.0% in connection with inflows of funds related to investments carried out by non-Brazilian investors in the Brazilian financial and capital markets with the objective of slowing the pace of speculative inflows of foreign capital into the Brazilian market and the appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar. The rate of the IOF/Exchange Tax generally applicable to foreign investments in the Brazilian financial and capital markets was later increased to 6.0%. In December 2011, the rate of the IOF/Exchange Tax applicable to several types of investments was reduced back to zero percent. As of the date of this annual report, all investments in the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax rate of zero percent.

In November 2009, the Brazilian government also established that the rate of the IOF/Securities Tax would apply to the transfer of shares with the specific purpose of enabling the issuance of ADSs. In December 2013, the rate of the IOF/Securities Tax applicable to transactions involving the issuance of ADSs was reduced to zero percent.

The imposition of these taxes may discourage foreign investment in shares of Brazilian companies, including our company, due to higher transaction costs, and may negatively impact the price and volatility of our ADSs and common shares on the NYSE and the BM&FBOVESPA.

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

Overview

We are one of the principal integrated telecommunications service providers in Brazil with approximately 70.053.4 million revenue generating units, or RGUs, as of December 31, 2015.2019. We operate throughout Brazil and offer a range of integrated telecommunications services that include fixed-lineResidential Services, Personal Mobility Services and mobile telecommunication services, network usage (interconnection), data transmission services (including broadband access services), Pay-TV (including as part of double-play, triple-play and quadruple-play packages), internet services and other telecommunications services for residential customers, small, medium and large companies and governmental agencies. We own approximately 363,000 kilometers of installed fiber optic cable, distributed throughout Brazil. Our mobile network covers areas in which approximately 88.7% of the Brazilian population lives and works. According to ANATEL, as of December 31, 2015, we had an 18.6% market share of the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market and, as of December 31, 2015, we had a 34.7% market share of the Brazilian fixed-line market. As part of our convergence strategy, we offer more than one million Wi-Fi hotspots in public places, such as airports and shopping malls.B2B Services.

Our traditional Residential Services business in Brazil includes (1) local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, and public telephones, in accordance with the concessions granted to us by ANATEL, (2) broadband services (3) andPay-TV services and (4) network usage services (interconnection).provided to residential customers in our fixed-line concession service areas, comprising the entire territory of Brazil other than the State of São Paulo. We are the largest fixed-line telecommunications companiescompany in Brazil in terms of total number of lines in service as of December 31, 2015. We are the principal fixed-line telecommunications services provider in our service areas, comprising the entire territory of Brazil other than the State of São Paulo,2019 based on our 14.910.3 million fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2015,2019, with a market share of 55.0%48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas as of December 31, 2015.

that date. We own the largest fiber optic network in Brazil, with more than 376,000 kilometers of installed fiber optic cable, distributed throughout Brazil. We focus on increasing the revenue generated by this customer base by aggressively promoting convergent services (double-play, triple-play and quadruple-play packages) including our mobile, broadband andPay-TV services. We offer a variety of high-speed broadband services in our fixed-line service areas, including services offered by our subsidiaries BrT Serviços de Internet S.A., or BrTI, and Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimídia Ltda. Our broadband services primarily utilize Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line, or ADSL, technology.services. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had 5.84.2 million asymmetric digital subscriber line, or ADSL, subscribers, representing 62%60.0% of our residential fixed lines in serviceline customers as of that date.

We offerPay-TV services under ourOi TV brand. We deliverPay-TV services throughout our residential service areas using DTH satellite technology. As of December 31, 2019, we had 1.5 million residentialPay-TV subscribers, representing 20.7% of our residential fixed line customers as of that date.

Our Personal Mobility Services business offers mobile telecommunications services throughout Brazil, as well asBrazil. Our mobile network covers areas in which approximately 94% of the Brazilian population lives and works. In addition, we provide network usage services (interconnection). services. Based on our 48.136.8 million mobile subscribers as of December 31, 2015,2019, we believe that we are onehad a 16.2% market share of the principalBrazilian mobile telecommunications service providers in Brazil. Based on information available from ANATEL,market as of December 31, 2015 our market share was 18.6% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.that date.

Our SME and CorporateB2B Services business provideprovides voice, broadband,Pay-TV, data transmission and dataother telecommunications services to our SMEsmall and corporate customersmedium sized enterprises, or SMEs, corporation and governmental agencies throughout Brazil.

As a result of our acquisition in May 2014 of all of the operating assets then held by Pharol, except interests held directly or indirectly in TmarPart We also provide wholesale interconnection, network usage (interconnection) services and our company, and subsequenttraffic transportation services to our sale in June 2015 of PT Portugal, we hold significant interests inother telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, São Tomé and Principe in Africa and Timor Leste in Asia. Our interests in telecommunications companies in Africa are held through Africatel, in which we own a 75% interest. Our interests in telecommunications companies in Timor Leste are held through TPT, in which we own a 76.14% interest. On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel, representing 75% of the share capital of Africatel. In addition, on June 17, 2015, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in TPT, representing 76.14% of the share capital of TPT. As a result, as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, we recorded the assets and liabilities of Africatel and TPT as held-for sale, although we do not record Africatel or TPT as discontinued operations in our income statement due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel and TPT on our results of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when a sale of these assets may be completed.providers.

Our principal executive office is located at Rua Humberto de Campos No. 425, 6 1/2th8th floor–Leblon,22430-190 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and our telephone number at this address is(55-21) 3131-2918.

Our Recent History and Development

Adoption of Transformation PlanOur Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

Following the change in our senior management in 2014, we developed a plan to pursue business growth through innovative solutions that focus on enhancing our customers’ experience rather than merely selling our services, which we refer to as the Transformation Plan. The Transformation Plan emphasizes interdepartmental collaboration and the development of integrated solutions that we believe will result in a cost-efficient, sustainable business with a focus on client satisfaction. The initiatives of the Transformation Plan are grouped under four pillars: Digitalization, Convergence, Data and Cost Control all aiming to provide the customer with a better experience. Digitalization refers to the process of making certain of our services available electronically, either through applications for smartphones or on our website enhancing the relationship with our customers. Convergence refers to offerings of combined services, such as the bundled offerings that we launched during 2015, including the following plan portfolios:On June 20, 2016, Oi, Totalin the Residential business;Oi Mais andOi Livre in the Personal Mobility Services business; andOi Mais Empresasin the SME and Corporate Services business. Offering all products under one package provides better customer satisfaction and higher loyalty and margins, essential to any capital intensive and competitive market. Data refers to the growing customer demand for larger data packages with unrestricted use. Cost Control refers to various measures we are undertaking to reduce our costs and expenses and maximize the efficiency and sustainability of our operations. The solutions we developed in connectiontogether with the Transformation Plan were based onother RJ Debtors, filed a comprehensive study of our customers’ telecommunications needs, with a view to improve the way our customers communicate.

In December 2014, we created a department tasked with monitoring and supporting the execution of the Transformation Plan, which we refer to as the Transformation Project Department. The Transformation Project Department consists of a team of employees from various departments, was initially led by a chief transformation project officer, who oversaw the process and reported directly to our chief executive officer. During 2015, members of the Transformation Project Department team met with senior management on a weekly basis to discuss progress on the more than 300 initiatives developedjoint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Transformation Plan. In late 2015, we createdBrazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 19 and 20, 2017, a strategy and new business department, which we referGCM to asconsider approving the Strategy and New Business Department, which supplemented the Transformation Project Department’s role with respect to initiatives related to new business, human resources, communications, marketing and digitalization. In February 2016, the Strategy and New Business Department took over the chief transformation project officer’s role of overseeing the Transformation Project Department.

The TransformationRJ Plan was divided into two key phases, eachheld following the confirmation that the required quorum of which can be summarized by four key goals. The first phase focused on short-term solutions designed to enable our company to remain competitive in a challenging macroeconomic environment. The four key goals of the first phase of the Transformation Plan are: (1) cost savings, (2) working capital improvements, (3) customer profitability improvements, and (4) optimization of our organizational structure. First phase initiatives included reductions in operating expenses, optimization of capital expenditures, reductions in working capital costs, changes in marketing strategies and pricing models and reductions in head-count related costs, such as overtime pay and travel expenses. We implemented several first phase initiatives during the first quarter of 2015, including the renegotiation of 69% of the number of contracts slated for renegotiation, the reduction of the number of vehicles in our fleet by 13% and the reduction of headcount-related expenses by 37%, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014.

The second phase consists of end-to-end initiatives designed to integrate our departments and enable our company to provide integrated service to our customers. The four key goals of the second phase of the Transformation Plan are: (1) process and organizational efficiency, (2) commercial and operational productivity, (3) cross-departmental improvement and (4) enhanced customer experience. Second phase initiatives combine elementscreditors of each of the pillars of the Transformation Plan to seek to deliver integrated solutions to our customers. An example of a second phase initiativeclasses I, II, III, and IV was the transformation of our call center operations, which was accomplished by revising our customer complaint procedures and creating a specialized team of specially trained call center professional to handle all downgrade requests. This initiative involved changes to and collaboration among multiple departments within our company. We began implementing second phase initiatives in the second quarter of 2015 and will continue to do so.attendance. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 87% of the initiatives we developed pursuant to the Transformation Plan had been implemented. The remaining initiatives, many of which are more complex and require more time to become fully operational, are in the process of being implemented. We believe that the

Transformation Plan initiatives were the most significant factors that led to increases in our revenues per RGU in 2015, the decline in operating expenses per RGU and a 17% reduction in customer complaint calls in 2015, in each case as compared to 2014.

Outsourcing of Mobile Handset and Tablet Inventory and Distribution Management

In September 2015, we entered into an agreement with Allied S.A., or Allied, a technology equipment distributor in Brazil, pursuant to which Allied has agreed to manage the purchase, distribution and sale of mobile handsets and tablets exclusively to our sales channels. We remain responsible for the strategic management of the supply chain, the relationship with our sales channels and the choice of our handset portfolio. We entered into this agreement with Allied as part of our effort to further accelerate sales and the migration of our mobile customer base to 3G and 4G smartphones, improve logistics efficiencies associated with the supply of mobile handsets and tablets to our sales channels, reduce logistics and warehousing costs and reduce the working capital used in carrying handset and tablet inventories.

Rio Forte Defaults and PT Exchange

Prior to the Oi capital increase, Pharol’s then wholly-owned subsidies PTIF and PT Portugal subscribed to an aggregate of €897 million principal amount of commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, that matured in July 2014. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal as part of the Oi capital increase,RJ Plan, we becamenegotiated the creditor under this commercial paper.

On July 15 and 17, 2014, Rio Forte defaulted on the commercial paper held by PTIF and PT Portugal. On July 22, 2014, Rio Forte filed a petition for controlled management with the courts of Luxembourg after concluding that it was not in a position to fulfill the obligations resulting from certain debts that had matured in July 2014. Rio Forte’s request was rejected on October 17, 2014. The Luxembourg Commercial Court denied Rio Forte’s request for controlled management on October 17, 2014 and declared Rio Forte bankrupt on December 8, 2014.

On September 8, 2014, we, TmarPart, Pharol and our subsidiaries PT Portugal and PTIF, entered into the Exchange Agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, and a stock option agreement, or the PT Option Agreement. On the same date, we, Pharol and TmarPart executed a terms of a commitment agreement, which we refer to as the Terms of Commitment Agreement. For more information regarding the PT Option Agreement and the Terms of Commitment Agreement, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions— Related Party Transactions.”

On March 24, 2015, PT Portugal assigned its rights under the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement to PTIF. On March 27, 2015, PT Portugal assigned all of its rights and obligations under the Rio Forte commercial paper that it owned to PTIF.

Under the PT Exchange Agreement, we agreed to transfer the defaulted Rio Forte commercial paper to Pharol and Pharol agreed to deliver to us an aggregate of 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares, representing 16.9% of our outstanding share capital, including 17.1% of our outstanding voting capital prior to giving effect to the PT Exchange.

On March 30, 2015, the transactions contemplated by the PT Exchange Agreement were completed through the transfer of Rio Forte commercial paper in the aggregate amount of €897 million to Pharol in exchange for 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares.

Sale of PT Portugal

On June 2, 2015, we sold all of the share capital of PT Portugal to Altice Portugal for a purchase price equal to the enterprise value of PT Portugal of €6,900 million, subject to adjustments based on the financial debt, cash and working capital of PT Portugal on the closing date, plus an additional earn-out amount of €500 million in the event that the consolidated revenues of PT Portugal and its subsidiaries (as of the closing date) for any single year between the year ending December 31, 2015 and the year ending December 31, 2019 is equal to or exceeds €2,750 million.

In connection with the closing, Altice Portugal disbursed €5,789 million, of which €869 million was utilized by PT Portugal to prepay outstanding indebtedness in that amount, and €4,920 million were paid to our company in cash. As of December 31, 2015, we had used R$8,682 million of the net cash proceeds of the PT Portugal Disposition for the prepayment of indebtedness of our company, and as of the date of this annual report have used an additional R$5,350 million of these net cash proceeds for the prepayment and repayment of indebtedness of our company. We expect to use the remainder of these net cash proceeds for the repayment of indebtedness of our company.

In anticipation of the PT Portugal Disposition, PT Portugal transferred PTIF, its wholly-owned finance subsidiary, to Oi. As a result of the completion of the PT Portugal Disposition, the indebtedness of PTIF, which had previously been classified as liabilities associated with assets held for sale in our consolidated financial statements, was reclassified as indebtedness of our company. In addition, in connection with the PT Portugal Disposition, PTIF assumed all obligations under PT Portugal’s outstanding 6.25% Notes due 2016.

In addition, PT Portugal transferred to Oi all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações, which holds our direct and indirect interests in Africatel and TPT, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste.

Issuance of €600 Million of 5.625% Notes due 2021 and Tender for PTIF and Oi Notes

In June 2015, our wholly-owned subsidiary Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A., issued and sold 5.625% notes due 2021 in the aggregate principal amount of €600 million. We used €321.54 million of the proceeds of these notes to repurchase €56.92 million aggregate principal amount of PTIF’s 5.625% Notes due 2016, €115.88 million aggregate principal amount of PTIF’s 4.375% Notes due 2017 and €148.74 million aggregate principal amount of Oi’s 5.125% Notes due 2017 that we had offered to purchase in a contemporaneous tender offer. We used the remaining net proceeds of the issuance of these notes to repay or prepay other indebtedness of our company.

Alternative Share Structure and Corporate Ownership Simplification

On March 31, 2015, the shareholders of TmarPart acting at a pre-meeting (reunião prévia) of the shareholders of TmarPart (1) unanimously approved the adoption of an alternative share structure, after analyzing options and taking into consideration the obstacles to the completion of the previously announced merger of shares of Oi and TmarPart, and (2) authorized the managements of TmarPart and Oi to begin taking the applicable steps to implement the alternative share structure. The alternative share structure was intended to achieve many of the primary purposes of the merger of shares of Oi and TmarPart, including the adoption by our company of the best corporate governance practices required by BM&FBovespa’sNovo Mercado segment and the elimination of the control of Oi through the various shareholders’ agreements governing Oi, while maintaining the goal of implementing a transaction that would result in the listing of the shares of Oi on theNovo Mercado.

The implementation of the alternative share structure consisted of the corporate ownership simplification transactions (described below), the adoption of new by-laws of our company, the election of a new board of directors of our company, and a voluntary share exchange through which holders of our preferred shares were entitled to exchange their preferred shares for our common shares.

On September 1, 2015, we and several of our direct and indirect shareholders undertook the following transactions, which we refer to collectively as the corporate ownership simplification transactions:

AG Telecom merged with and into PASA;

LF Tel merged with and into EDSP;

PASA and EDSP merged with and into Bratel Brasil;

Valverde merged with and into TmarPart;

Venus RJ Participações S.A., Sayed RJ Participações S.A. and PTB2 S.A. merged with and into Bratel Brasil;

Bratel Brasil merged with and into TmarPart; and

TmarPart merged with and into our company.

In connection with these transactions, all of the shareholders’ agreements to which we were an intervening party and through which the direct and indirect shareholders of TmarPart had rights to influence our management and operations were terminated. In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, the net assets of TmarPart, in the amount of R$122.4 million were merged into the shareholders’ equity of Oi and as a result of the merger, TmarPart ceased to exist. The merger of TmarPart with and into Oi also resulted in the transfer to the shareholders’ equity of Oi of goodwill derived from the acquisition of equity interest recorded by Bratel Brasil, AG Telecom, LF Tel, and TmarPart, in accordance with applicable Brazilian law. In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, shareholders of TmarPart received the same number of shares of Oi as were held by TmarPart immediately prior to the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi in proportion to their holdings in TmarPart. No withdrawal rights for the holders of shares of Oi were available in connection with the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi.

At an extraordinary shareholders meeting of our company held on September 1, 2015, our shareholders (1) adopted amended by-laws for our company that were intended to increase the corporate governance standards applicable to our company as well as to limit the voting rights of holders of a large concentration of common shares, and (2) elected a new board of directors with terms of office until the shareholders’ meeting that approves our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2017. For more information about our amended by-laws, see “Item 10. Additional Information— Description of Our Company’s By-laws.” For more information about the members of our board of directors, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board of Directors.”

On October 8, 2015, we completed a voluntary share exchange under which we had offered (1) the holders of our preferred shares (including preferred shares represented by the Preferred ADSs), the opportunity to convert their preferred shares into our common shares at a ratio of 0.9211 common shares for each preferred share, plus cash in lieu of any fractional share, and (2) the holders of the Preferred ADSs the opportunity to exchange their Preferred ADSs for Common ADSs at a ratio of 0.9211 Common ADSs for each Preferred ADS, plus cash in lieu of any fractional Common ADS. Holders of 314,250,655 of our outstanding preferred shares tendered their shares for conversion or exchange of the related ADSs. Each of Pharol and Caravelas participated in the voluntary share exchange and surrendered all of its preferred shares for conversion. As a result of the voluntary share exchange, 314,250,655 of our outstanding preferred shares were cancelled and in exchange we issued 289,456,278 of our common shares.

Acquisition of Telemont

In October 2015, we acquired the operations in Rio de Janeiro of Telemont Engenharia de Telecomunicações S.A., or Telemont. We had entered into a services agreement with Telemont in January 2012 for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the State of Rio de Janeiro.

Exclusivity Agreement with LetterOne

In October 2015, we entered into an exclusivity agreement with LetterOne Technology (UK) LLP, or LetterOne, with respect to the negotiation of a potential transaction for the specific purpose of allowing a consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications industry involving a potential business combination with TIM. As part of the potential transaction, LetterOne proposed to make a capital contribution of up to US$4.0 billion in our company, contingent on the completion of the consolidation transaction. On February 25, 2016, we were notified by LetterOne that it had been informed by TIM that the latter was no longer interested in proceeding with the negotiations of a business combination with our company and that without TIM’s involvement, LetterOne could not proceed with transaction as previously planned.

Engagement of PJT Partners

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad

hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF, which we refer to as the Ad Hoc Group, the International Bondholder Committee, a group of creditors in the Netherlands, which we refer to as the IBC, and certain other unaffiliated bondholders. Under the terms of the Commitment Agreement, such bondholders, which we refer to as the Backstop Investors, agreed to backstop our preemptive offering of Common Shares, subject to the terms and conditions of the Commitment Agreement. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at this GCM, reflecting amendments to the RJ Plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims will receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

During 2018, the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan was concluded.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and remain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Administrator must take place within 60 days from the date of submission of the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of our mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the specific terms of the proposed amendment that will be presented to the RJ Court.

Preemptive Offering and Closing Under Commitment Agreement

As contemplated by Section 6 of the RJ Plan, on November 13, 2018, we commenced a preemptive offering of Common Shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of our Common Shares and Preferred Shares received 1.333630 transferable rights for each Common Share or Preferred Share held as of November 19, 2018. Each subscription right entitled its holder to subscribe to one Common Share at a subscription price of R$1.24 per Common Share. In addition, each holder of a subscription right was entitled to request the subscription for additional Common Shares, up to the total of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, we issued 1,530,457,356 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial Common Shares. On January 21, 2019, we issued 91,080,933 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess Common Shares. The proceeds of these subscriptions were R$2,011 million.

On January 25, 2019, we issued 1,604,268,162 Common Shares, representing the total number of Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares and excess Common Shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement for the aggregate amount of R$1,989 million. In addition, under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement, on that date we issued 272,148,705 Common Shares in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

Pharol Settlement Agreement

On January 8, 2019, Oi and its subsidiaries as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

Acquisition of A.R.M.

We hadTelemar and PT Participações entered into a servicessettlement agreement with A.R.M. EngenhariaBratel and Pharol, or the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all then-existing litigation involving the parties in October 2012Brazil and abroad.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement Oi was required to: (1) pay Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million, which under the Pharol Settlement Agreement was used by Pharol for installation, operationthe subscription of 85,721,774 Common Shares issued by Oi in our preemptive offering of Common Shares; and corrective(2) upon confirmation of the Pharol Settlement Agreement by the RJ Court, (a) transfer to Bratel 32,000,000 Common Shares and preventive maintenance1,800,000 Preferred Shares of Oi held in treasury, (b) pay Pharol the annual fees related to certain obligations assumed by Oi with respect to proceedings of Pharol in Portugal, and (c) in case of a sale of at least 50% of the shares of Unitel indirectly held by Oi, deposit into an escrow account an amount necessary to guarantee the payment of any potential liabilities of Pharol in tax proceedings whose chance of loss is assessed as possible or probable.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement, on February 8, 2019, the member designated by Oi was elected to Pharol’s board of directors.

On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019.

During February 2019, we repurchased a total of 1,800,000 Preferred Shares over the B3 at prices ranging between R$1.42 and R$1.45 per Preferred Share, for an aggregate purchase price of R$2.6 million. These Preferred Shares were transferred to Pharol to satisfy the terms of the Pharol Settlement Agreement. Oi has satisfied the other terms of the Pharol Settlement Agreement applicable to our company and on April 4, 2019, all then-existing litigation involving the parties in Brazil and abroad was terminated.

Merger of Copart 4 with and into Telemar and Merger of Copart 5 with and into Oi

In January 2019, Copart 4 was merged with and into Telemar and in March 2019, Copart 5 was merged with and into Oi.

Sale of Interest in CVTelecom

On May 21, 2019, PT Ventures sold all of the shares that it owned of Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A., or CVTelecom, a provider of fixed-line and mobile services in the Cabo Verde Islands, representing 40% of CVTelecom’s share capital, to the National Social Security Institute (Instituto Nacional de Previdência Social) and state-owned company, ASA – National Airport and Aerial Security Company (ASA – Empresa Nacional de Aeroportos e Segurança Aérea, S.A.), for US$26 million. This sale generated a net gain of R$67 million.

In connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the Statessale of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, Bahia, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará, Amapá, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná and Santa Catarina.

In April and May 2016, we acquired A.R.M. Engenharia’s operations in the States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and Paraná, and we are managing those operations. Also in May 2016, weCVTelecom shares, PT Ventures entered into an agreement with the shareholdersgovernment of A.R.M. EngenhariaCabo Verde for the definite termination of the arbitration proceedings pending before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the International Chamber of Commerce that had been filed by PT Ventures against the government of Cabo Verde in March 2015.

Adoption of Strategic Plan

OnJuly 16, 2019, we announced our plan to acquirepursue strategic alternatives, with a focus on the totalityimprovement of our operational and financial performance with a sustainable business model, for the purpose of maximizing enterprise value, in the context of the RJ process. We developed this plan in collaboration with a group of strategic advisors following an assessment of each of our business units focused on competitive advantages, effective capital allocation and anticipated funding needs to execute this plan.

The principal elements of this plan include:

accelerating our deployment of FTTH leveraging ournon-replicable fiber optic network to become the national leader in FTTH;

accelerating our wholesale operation to exploit the full potential of the unregulated market for wholesale transmission services utilizing our fiber optic network as we seek to become the leading provider of infrastructure in support of 5G services in Brazil;

increasing our focus on our information and communications technology solutions business;

leveraging our mobile network capacity by increasing our investment in 4G and 4.5G services using our available 1.8 GHz spectrum and increasing our marketing efforts focused on high-value post-paid customers to increase revenue of our mobile services;

exploring strategic alternatives with respect to our mobile business to maximize shareholder value;

implementing a sustainable program of cost reductions based on opportunities identified by our management in our sales and marketing, organizational processes, information technology, procurement and network operations activities;

divestingnon-core assets, including communications towers, data centers, our African investments, certain real estate and othernon-strategic assets, as part of our efforts to finance our capital expenditure plans.

Sale of PT Ventures

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, issued by ARM Engenharia. The completionand Sonangol paid US$699 million of the transactionpurchase price in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is subject to customarybe paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Sale of Botafogo Property

On February 21, 2020, we sold our property at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda. for R$120.5 million.

Market Sounding Regarding Mobile Business

During the first quarter of 2020, our financial advisor, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, conducted a market sounding process seeking to gauge the interest of a variety of strategic investors in the acquisition of our mobile business. The goal of the market sounding process was to assist us in identifying opportunities relating to our mobile business, and to enable us to make a preliminary assessment regarding the creation of value arising out of a potential sale of our mobile business.

In March 2020, Bank of America Merrill Lynch received manifestations of interest from several of these investors. We continue to analyze these manifestations of interest, and are engaging is discussions with certain of these investors regarding due diligence matters. However, we have not entered into any binding agreement with respect to any proposed sale of our mobile business and cannot do so without approval of the RJ Court. Although we may engage in negotiations with certain of these investors to discuss the terms under which these investors would be willing to make a binding proposal, any binding proposals would be required to be submitted pursuant to a process supervised by the RJ Court following an amendment to the RJ Plan to include the process necessary to solicit such binding proposals.

There can be no assurance that the RJ Plan will be amended in a manner necessary to facilitate the potential sale of our mobile business, that a process to solicit binding proposals supervised by the RJ Court will result in our receiving proposals containing terms and conditions, precedent, including the purchase price, that will be satisfactory to our company, that we will be able to fulfill the conditions included in any binding proposal, or the timing of the completion of any potential sale of our mobile business.

Changes to the Membership of Oi’s Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers

Since January 1, 2019, there have been several changes to the composition of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers.

On June 3, 2019, Ricardo Reisen de Pinho resigned as a member of Oi’s board of directors.

On September 20, 2019, Oi’s board of directors elected Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu to serve as a member of our board of executive officers, without specific designation, to act as our chief operating officer, and Mr. Abreu resigned as a member of our board of directors.

On October 31, 2019, Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão resigned as our chief financial officer and investor relations officer and Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto resigned as our chief legal due diligenceofficer. On the same date, Oi’s board of directors elected Camille Loyo Faria to serve as our chief financial officer and approvalinvestor relations officer and elected Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho to serve as our chief legal officer.

On January 31, 2020, Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto resigned as our chief executive officer. On the same date, Oi’s board of directors elected Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu to serve as our chief executive officer.

On March 4, 2020, Oi’s board of directors appointed Claudia Quintella Woods to fill one of the vacancies on Oi’s board of directors, and on March 13, 2020, Oi’s board of directors appointed Armando Lins Netto to fill the remaining vacancy on Oi’s board of directors. The investiture of Mr. Armando Lins Netto is conditioned upon the prior assessment of ANATEL.

For information about the current members of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

Issuance of Oi Mobile Debentures

In February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible secured debentures. These debentures are guaranteed by Oi and Telemar and are secured by a pledge of cash flows from our receivables in an amount up to R$200 million per month and a first-priority lien on our right to use mobile frequencies. These debentures mature in January 2022 in the Administrative Council for Economic Defense.event that we raise more than R$5 billion from our divestments by July 31, 2020, and will amortize at a rate of R$100 million per month beginning in August 2020 through January 2022 in the event that we do not achieve this divestment target. These debentures bear PIK interest, capitalized monthly, through January 2021 at a rate of 12.66% per annum based on the daily U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount determined in accordance with the daily exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal, and interest at a rate of 13.61% per annum, payable in cash, thereafter.

Corporate Structure

The following chart presents ourOi’s corporate structure and principal operating subsidiaries as of May 13, 2016.April 24, 2020. For a complete list of our subsidiaries, see Exhibit 8.01 to this annual report.

 

LOGOLOGO

Operations in Brazil

Our concessions and authorizations from the Brazilian government allow us to provide:

fixed-line telecommunications services in Regions I and II of Brazil;

long-distance telecommunications services throughout Brazil;

mobile telecommunications services in Regions I, II and III of Brazil;

data transmission services throughout Brazil; and

direct to home (DTH) satellite television services throughout Brazil.

In addition, we have authorizations to provide fixed-line local telecommunications services in Region III.

Region I consists of 16 Brazilian states located in the northeastern and part of the northern and southeastern regions. Region I covers an area of approximately 5.4 million square kilometers, which represents approximately 64% of the country’s total land area and accounted for 40.3% of Brazil’s GDP in 2011. The population of Region I was 105.3 million as of 2011, which represented 54.7% of the total population of Brazil as of that date. In 2011, per capita income in Region I was approximately R$15,869, varying from R$7,836 in the State of Piauí to R$28,696 in the State of Rio de Janeiro.

Region II consists of the Federal District and nine Brazilian states located in the western, central and southern regions. Region II covers an area of approximately 2.9 million square kilometers, which represents approximately 33.5% of the country’s total land area and accounted for approximately 27.1% of Brazil’s GDP in 2011. The population of Region II was 45.5 million as of 2011, which represented 23.7% of the total population of Brazil as of that date. In 2011, per capita income in Region II was approximately R$24,668, varying from R$11,782 in the State of Acre to R$63,020 in the Federal District.

Region III consists of the State of São Paulo. Region III covers an area of approximately 248,000 square kilometers, which represents approximately 2.9% of the country’s total land area and accounted for approximately 32.6% of Brazil’s GDP in 2011. The population of Region III was 41.6 million as of 2011, which represented 21.6% of the total population of Brazil as of that date. In 2011, per capita income in Region III was approximately R$32,449.

The following table sets forth key economic data, compiled by IBGE, for the Federal District and each of the Brazilian states.

State

  Population
(in millions)
(2011)
   Population
per

Square
Kilometer
(2011)
   % of GDP
(2011)
   GDP per
Capita
(in 
reais)
(2011)
 

Region I:

        

Rio de Janeiro

   16.1     368.7     11.2     28,696  

Minas Gerais

   19.7     33.6     9.3     19,573  

Bahia

   14.1     25.0     3.9     11,340  

Pernambuco

   8.9     90.2     2.5     11,776  

Espírito Santo

   3.5     77.0     2.4     27,542  

Pará

   7.7     6.2     2.1     11,494  

Ceará

   8.5     57.3     2.1     10,314  

Amazonas

   3.5     2.3     1.6     18,244  

Maranhão

   6.6     20.0     1.3     7,853  

Rio Grande do Norte

   3.2     60.6     0.9     11,287  

Paraíba

   3.8     67.2     0.9     9,349  

Alagoas

   3.1     113.2     0.7     9,079  

Sergipe

   2.1     95.4     0.6     12,536  

Piauí

   3.1     12.5     0.6     7,836  

Amapá

   0.7     4.8     0.2     13,105  

Roraima

   0.5     2.1     0.2     15,105  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Subtotal

   105.3       40.3    

Region II:

        

Rio Grande do Sul

   10.7     38.1     6.4     24,563  

Paraná

   10.5     52.7     5.8     22,770  

State

  Population
(in millions)
(2011)
   Population
per

Square
Kilometer
(2011)
   % of GDP
(2011)
   GDP per
Capita

(in reais)
(2011)
 

Santa Catarina

   6.3     66.3     4.1     26,761  

Goiás

   6.1     17.9     2.7     18,299  

Mato Grosso

   3.1     3.4     1.7     23,218  

Federal District

   2.6     448.3     4.0     63,020  

Mato Grosso do Sul

   2.5     6.9     1.2     19,875  

Rondônia

   1.6     6.6     0.7     17,659  

Tocantins

   1.4     5.0     0.4     12,891  

Acre

   0.7     4.5     0.2     11,782  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Subtotal

   45.5       27.1    

Region III (State of São Paulo)

   41.6     167.5     32.6     32,449  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total

   192.4       100.0    
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Source: IBGE.

Set forth below is a map of Brazil showing the areas in Region I, Region II and Region III.

LOGO

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects depend in part on the performance of the Brazilian economy. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Brazil.”

Our Services

We provide a varietythe following services:

Residential Services throughout Brazil (other than in the State of São Paulo) consisting of local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, broadband services andPay-TV services under ourOi TV brand, primarily through direct to home, or DTH (a satellite technology), which we offer throughout Brazil;

Personal Mobility Services throughout Brazil consisting of mobile voice and data telecommunications services as well as value-added services; and

B2B Services throughout Brazil consisting of our fixed-line and mobile voice and data telecommunications services, broadband services andPay-TV services, which are marketed and delivered to the residential market, the personal mobility marketSME, corporate and the SMEgovernmental customers, as well as interconnection services, wholesale network usage services and traffic transportation services, which are primarily marketed and delivered to corporate markets throughout Brazil.customers (including other telecommunications providers).

Residential Services

Our primary services to the residential market are fixed-line voice, broadband and Pay-TV services. We offer theseour residential services on an a la carte basis and as bundles, including bundles with other services including our mobile voice services and our mobile data communications services.services, as well as on an a la carte basis. In the Residential Services business, we view the household, rather than an individual, as our customer, and our offerings–offerings, particularly our bundled offerings–offerings, are designed to meet the needs of the household as a whole.

We identified cost savings and customer profitability initiatives as two of the pillars of the first phase of the Transformation Plan, which phase was largely implemented in 2015. As a result, we decreased our commercial efforts throughout the year in order to reduce sales expenses and capital expenditures. In late 2015, however,we increased commercial efforts by launching several plans aimed at reducing costs and offering more comprehensive services to our customers at higher prices. These higher-value offerings increased our ARPU in the residential services business even as our customer base decreased.

Also in 2015, our Residential Services business launched a series of initiatives aimed at increasing convergence among our product offerings, one of the key pillars of the Transformation Plan. As a result, offerings of our bundled services took on increasing importance, as they provide a better and more integrated experience for our customers while also increasing our ARPU.

Bundled Services

Our bundled services offerings adopted as part of the Transformation Plan have focused on increasing our profitability by providing a more comprehensive mix of higher-value services to our customers. In 2015, we focused our efforts on upselling and cross-selling our services to existing customers, enhancing existing customer loyalty and attracting new customers by offering higher-value services such as the bundled services in the “Oi Total” and “Oi Conta Total” portfolios. We believe that these measures, together with oursimplified plan offeringsin the Residential Services business, resulted in an ARPU increase for each of our residential services (fixed-line voice, broadband and Pay-TV services) in 2015.

In addition, we believe bundled offerings build customer loyalty and serve to reduce churn rates as compared to standalone services. Certain bundles offer incentives such as free installation of fixed-line and broadband services, free modem and Wi-Fi and access to certain smartphone applications for up to three months free of charge. We believe that a bundle that contains more services can be more appealing to a customer than, for example, standalone broadband services at faster speeds. Both Embratel and Telefônica Brasil offer broadband services at higher speeds than us. However, neither company has a quadruple-play bundle, such asOi Total Completo, that combines fixed-line voice, broadband, Pay-TV and mobile services. By developing unique, multi-product bundles with joint installation, integrated billing and unified customer service, we set ourselves apart from other service providers. We believe that being at the forefront of multi-product offerings allows us to remain competitive, maintain our customers’ loyalty and provide higher-value services.

Oi Total

In 2015, we launchedOi Total, a residential services bundle designed to increase our market penetration and profitability by attracting new customers and offering a higher number of servicers per user. EachOi Total plan includes fixed-line voice and broadband services with speeds of up to 35 Mbps through VDSL. CertainOi Totalplans also include Pay-TV and/or mobile services.Oi Total Completo, for example, is our quadruple-play package

that includes fixed-line voice, broadband, Pay-TV, as well as mobile services. The integrated processes (including single billing, joint installation and unified customer service) ofOi Total have also allowed us to generate greater operational efficiencies, thereby reducing our operating costs. By December 2015,Oi Total had been launched in 13 Brazilian states (Espírito Santo, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Acre, Amazonas, Rondônia, Roraima, Tocantins, Rio Grande do Norte, Sergipe, Santa Catarina and Ceará) and the Federal District. As of December 31, 2015, 75.6% of our fixed-line customers subscribed to one of the plans in ourOi Total portfolio. In March 2016, we launchedOi Total in the remaining Brazilian states where we offer fixed-line services.

Our Oi Totalportfolio reinforces our convergence strategy, which is one of the pillars of the Transformation Plan.Oi Total embodies the multi-product concept, bringing a unique, complete and convenient experience for our customers by offering a single sale, joint installation, integrated billing in a single bill, and unified customer service. The mobile voice services offered byOi Total include the all-net model for voice and robust data packages also offered byOi Livre andOi Mais, in addition to offering extensive movie, TV and internet content that is available for streaming anytime, anywhere throughOi Play, our content platform that is free of charge for all of our customers. Since its launch in September 2015,Oi Playhas shown potential for growth and future revenue generation.

Oi Conta Total

In addition to the launch ofOi Total, we continued to offer our legacyOi Conta Total portfolio in 2015.Oi Conta Total is a triple-play plan that provides fixed-line and mobile voice services, broadband services, mobile data and unlimited text messages to subscribers of any provider. In addition,Oi Conta Totalprovides unlimited long-distance calls to our fixed-line and mobile subscribers (except for the low-cost version of this plan,Conta Total Light). On December 31, 2015, 11% of our fixed-line customers subscribed to one of the plans in theOi Conta Total portfolio.

OurOi Conta Total plan permits subscribers to make unlimited local calls to any of our fixed-line or mobile customers and includes an allowance of minutes selected by the customer for use to make long-distance calls and local calls to customers of other service providers. Subscribers also elect the speed of their fixed-line broadband service, which is available under this plan at speeds ranging from 2 Mbps to 15 Mbps. Subscribers to this plan are entitled to access our Oi Wi-Fi hotspots, and subscribers who elect speeds of 5 Mbps or greater are provided with a complimentary wireless router. Subscribers can elect add-on features for this plan, including mobile data plans, unlimited text messages to subscribers of any provider and unlimited long-distance calls to our fixed line or mobile customers.

As part of our emphasis on offering bundled services that increase profitability and build customer loyalty, in 2015 we also offered ourOi Conta Total Smartphone plan, which has the same structure asOi Conta Totalbut included ourOi Smartphone data plan and unlimited text messages. Subscribers to this plan receive a smartphone, mini-modem or tablet at a subsidized price and are able to access our network of Oi Wi-Fi hotspots.

In March 2016, we discontinued offeringOi Conta Total as an independent portfolio and moved these offerings under the umbrella ofOi Totalunder the brand nameOi Total Conectado.

Pay-TV and Broadband Bundles

Subscribers to our internet protocal Pay-TV, IP TV, service may subscribe to ourOi TV Mais HD package, together with a broadband subscription at 100 Mbps, or ourOi TV Mega HD package, together with a broadband subscription at 200 Mbps. Subscriptions to our IP TV packages are only available in areas in which we have deployed our fiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, network.

In addition to our service bundles, we have a la carte offerings for fixed-line voice, broadband, and Pay-TV services as described below.

Fixed-Line Voice Services

As of December 31, 2015, we had 14.4 million local fixed-line customers in our fixed-line service areas (including customers of our SME and Corporate Services). Local fixed-line services include installation, monthly subscription, metered services, collect calls and supplemental local services. Metered services include local calls that originate and terminate within a single local area and calls between separate local areas within specified metropolitan regions, which under ANATEL regulations, are chargedwe refer to as local calls. ANATEL recently changed the geographic classification of local areas and currently has divided our fixed-line service areas into approximately 4,400 local areas.

Calls within Brazil that are not classified as local calls are classified as domestic long-distance calls. We provide domestic and international long-distance services for calls originating from fixed-line devices in our fixed-line service areas.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute (Plano Básico de Minutos) and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan (Plano Alternativo de Serviços de Oferta Obrigatória), each ofto which includes installation charges, monthly subscription charges, and charges for local minutes. As of December 31, 2015, 13.6%a small percentage of our fixed-lineresidential customers subscribedsubscribe. A large majority of our residential customers subscribe to the Basic Plan per Minute or the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan.

Calls within Brazil that are not classified as local calls are classified as domestic long-distance calls. We provide domestic long-distance services for calls originating from fixed-line devices in Region I and Region II through our network facilities in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte and through interconnection agreements with other telecommunications providers, both fixed-line and mobile, that permit us to interconnect directly with their networks. We provide international long-distance services originating from fixed-line devices in our fixed-line service areas through agreements to interconnect our network with thoseone of the main telecommunications service providers worldwide.

In addition to the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan, we offer a variety of alternative fixed-line plans that we offer, which are designed to meet our customers’ usage profiles. As of December 31, 2015, 86.4% of our fixed-line customers subscribed to alternative plans,profiles, including our bundled services plans. We continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our alternative fixed-line plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers.

OurOi Fixo portfolio of fixed-line, voice-only plans provides a range of options, including unlimited on-net or all-net calls from fixed-line to fixed-line (depending on the plan), as well as on-net and off-net calls to mobile devices at pre-established rates.

We own and operate public telephones throughout our fixed-line service regions. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately 651,000 public telephones in service, all of which are operated by pre-paid cards.

Broadband Services

We provideoffer fixed broadband services through xDSL technologies and FTTH, with speeds ranging from 1 megabit per second, or Mbps, to 200 Mbps. We offer broadband services to our residential customers inas mostly part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line service areas. As of December 31, 2015, we offered broadband services in 4,699 municipalities and had 5.7 million broadband customers in our fixed-line service areas (including customers of our SME and Corporate Services). We offer ADSL services through ADSL modems installed using our customers’ conventional lines, which permit customers to use the telephone line simultaneously with the internet.services. Customers pay a fixed monthly subscription fee, irrespective of their actual connection time to the internet.

As of December 31, 2019, our network covered 85.3% of the municipalities in our fixed-line service areas, reaching a total of more than 3.6 million fixed broadband customers, and our national fiber network reached approximately 4.6 million homes through FTTH. As of December 31, 2019, we offered FTTH in 82 municipalities, an increase of 54 municipalities as compared to December 31, 2018. We offercontinue to strategically invest in our broadband a la carte subscriptionsnetwork in areas that we believe have the greatest potential for sales and growth.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our broadband plans and promotions in order to customers that do not subscribe tobetter service the needs of our bundled services plans at speeds ranging from 2 Mbps to 35 Mbps. To attractresidential customers, to this service, we offer new subscribers complementary anti-virus software and backup services, as well as a free wireless router with subscriptions at speeds of 5 Mbps or more.

We periodically offer promotions designed to encourage our existing broadband customers to migrate to plans offering higher speeds and to attract new customers to our broadband services. In some cases, we encourage our customers to migrate to higher broadband plans by providing broadband at faster speeds for the same prices as existing plans. This improvement of service without an increase in cost furthers our goals of improving the perception of quality of our services, enhancing the customer experience and enhancing customer loyalty.

We continue to strategically invest in areas where we see the greatest potential for sales and growth. Our two primary competitors in broadband services, Embratel and Telefônica Brasil, both offer broadband at higher speeds

than our offerings. As a result, in 2015 we devoted a substantial portion of our capital expenditures in investments to our network to increase the available broadband speeds that we are able to offer in order to attract new customers and enhance the loyalty of our existing customer base, which was a significant factor in the increase in our ARPU from broadband services during 2015.

In September 2015, we launched high-speed VDSL broadband service with offers ranging from 15 to 35 Mbps. We expect to be able to offer even greater speeds as we continue to invest in our broadband network infrastructure.

Pay-TV Services

We offer deliverPay-TV services under ourOi TV brand. We deliver Pay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network. In December 2012 and January 2013, we began to offer IP TVWe also deliverPay-TV services through our FTTHfiber optic network (internet protocolPay-TV, or IPTV) in Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,all the cities where we had approximately 1.2 million subscribershave deployed FTTH.

We offerPay-TV services to our Pay-TV services. Asresidential customers as part of December 31, 2015, approximately 11.5% of householdsbundled plans with our residentialtraditional fixed-line services subscribed toOi TV.

or on an a la carte basis. We offer threeseveral packages ofPay-TV services: (1) Oi TV Start HD with 118 channels including 20 high-definition, or HD, channels, (2) Oi TV Mix HD with 158 channels, including 43 HD channels,at different price points and (3) Oi TV Total HD with 183 channels, including 53 HD channels. Subscribersoffer subscribers to each of these packages have the option to customize the package through the purchase of additional channels featuring films offered by HBO/MAXCinemax and Telecine and sports offered by Futebol. Although these packages are available

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise ourPay-TV plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers and to attract new customers to ourPay-TV services.

Bundled Services

As an integrated telecommunications service provider, we focus a significant part of our marketing efforts on promoting our bundled services offerings, including through offers of free installation of fixed-line and broadband services, free modem andWi-Fi and access to certain smartphone applications free of charge. Our bundled services offerings for residential customers have focused on increasing our profitability by providing a more comprehensive mix of higher-value services to our customers. Our market research has shown that bundled offerings build customer loyalty and serve to reduce churn rates as compared to standalone services. In addition, we believe that by developing unique, multi-product bundles with joint installation, integrated billing and unified customer service, we set ourselves apart from other service providers.

We offer a variety of bundled services, including ourOi Total portfolio, consisting of:

Oi Total Solução Completa, our quadruple-play bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data,Pay-TV and mobile voice and data services;

Oi Total Conectado, ourtriple-pay bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data and mobile voice and data services;

Oi Total Residencial, our residential bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data andPay-TV;

Oi Total TV + Fixo, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice andPay-TV; and

Oi Total Play, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband access and OTT content (Oi Play).

Customers who subscribe to bundles receive price discounts and double the data allowance that we offer on an a la carte purchase,basis.

In addition toOi Total, we promote theseoffer bundles for residential customers that subscribe to our IPTV service that include broadband subscriptions at speeds of up to 200 Mbps. Subscriptions to our IPTV packages and approximately 65% ofare only available in areas in which we have deployed our subscribers for these packages purchase them as part of a bundle withFTTH network. Outside our broadband and/orFTTH network, we offerPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line voice services.service areas using our DTH satellite network.

Personal Mobility Services

Our Personal Mobility Services business is comprised ofofferspre-paid and post-paid and pre-paid mobile voice services and post-paid and pre-paid mobile data communications services. As of December 31, 2015, we had an aggregate of approximately 45.9 million subscribersplans:Oi Livre plans for our mobile services, including subscribers to our bundled plans. As of December 31, 2015, 85.2% of our personal mobility voice customers subscribed to thepre-paid plans and 14.8% subscribed to post-paid plans.

As part of our efforts under the Transformation Plan to increase profitability and enhance our customers’ experience, in 2015 we launched three new portfolios of mobile services plans: market;Oi Mais plans for the post-paid market,Oi Livre for the pre-paid marketmarket; andOi Mais Controle as a hybrid solution. All ofAlthough we no longer offer new subscriptions for voice-only mobile services, we continue to provide services to customers that have subscribed to these plans provide simpler options, data allowances without usage restrictions, and (with the exceptionOi Mais Controle Básico, the basicOi Mais Controleplan) all-net minutes. The introduction of these new offerings is part of our convergence strategy as these plans combine voice and data packages across our entire portfolio. This combination of voice and data packages encourages our customers to maintain voice services as part of their packages, which reduces that rate of decline of our customer base for fixed-line voice services. In addition, sincelegacy plans. Since our 3G and 4G networks offer greater capacity to meet the growing demand for data, we intend to accelerateare focused on accelerating the migration of users from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G by encouraging sales of 3G/4G smartphones and by including more data allowances in our new mobile offers. We believe these measures will enhance our customers’ experience and provide a better perception of the quality of our services.

Mobile Voice and Data Services

Post-Paid Services

Post-paid customers pay a monthly subscription fee and are billed on a monthly basis for services provided during the previous month. Post-paid plans include voice mail, caller ID, conference calling, call forwarding, calls on hold and special services. We believe that our new offerings in the post-paid market enable us to improve revenues and market share by offering a mix of services to the post-paid market at more attractive prices.

In November 2015, we launched theOi Mais portfolio for the post-paid market.Oi Mais plans offer a substantial increase in the size of data packages with no usage restrictions, all-net minutes to call customers of any operator anywhere in Brazil and a reduced one-time tariff for calls made to customers of any operator in Brazil in excess of the monthly plan allowance. We believe the introduction of all-net plans will eliminate the community effect among voice customers using such plans. Moreover, we believe our new data packages, which contain more data and no usage restrictions, will allow us to satisfy the growing demand from our customers for increased and unrestricted data usage.

Oi Mais plans range from R$79.90 per month to R$149.90 per month. They provide between 250 minutes and 3,000 minutes of calls and offer between 3 GB and 10 GB of 4G data to be used freely (including on social networking sites). AllOi Mais plans offer access to Oi Wi-Fi and unlimited text messaging to customers of any operator.

We continue to offerOi Conta Conectado 50, our traditional portfolio of plans, which provides an unlimited on-net mobile plan for local and long distance voice services and an all-net plan for fixed-line services. TheOi Conta Conectado 50plan also provides a limited off-net voice package for mobile calls to customers of other operators and 500 MB of data. In December 2015, we stopped offering new subscriptions to the low-cost planOi Conta 100, which offered voice only (no data) to our customers. As of December 31, 2015,Oi Conta Conectado represented 84% of our total post-paid base.

Pre-Paid Services Plans

Pre-paid customers activate their cellular numbers through the purchase and installation of a SIM card in their mobile handsets. We offerpre-paid voice and data bundles through ourOi Livre portfolio. OurOi Livre portfolio includes a range ofall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil (including unlimited minutes through theOi Livre Ilimitado plans) and data allowances (ranging from 1 GB to 4 GB of 4G mobile data) for flat fees. Customers choose the amount of time they have to use their voice and data allowances, ranging from seven to 30 days. Using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones, customers can freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate. Ourpre-paid customers are able to add credits to their accounts throughpoint-of-sale machines, ATMs, Apple and Android applications installed on their mobile devices such asMinha Oi andRecarga Oi using a credit card, our toll-free number or the purchase ofpre-paid cards at a variety of prices. These credits are valid for a fixed period of time following activation and can be extended when additional credits are purchased.

After conductingPost-Paid Plans

Customers of our post-paid plans are billed on a comprehensive ten-month study ofmonthly basis for contracted services used during the telecommunications consumption habitsprevious month, in Brazil, in November 2015 we launched ouraddition to any fees for special services. OurOi LivreMais portfolioDigital portfoliooffers unlimited text messages, unlimited minutes for the pre-paid market, which includes significant increases in data allowances and a flat fee for all-net calls (with the exception ofOi Livre Por Dia, our per-day pre-paid mobile plan) to customers of any operator in Brazil. This initiative changes theBrazil and two mobile service market in Brazil, disrupting the original pre-paid model indata plans (8 GB and 50 GB) with no usage restrictions, plus no data traffic charge for major social networks and video to apps, which customers acquired SIM cards from different operators and used the respective SIM card for on-net calls with that particular operator in an effort to avoid paying high rates for off-net calls.

The launch ofOi Livre was a strategic move given the recent reductions in interconnection tariffs in Brazil. It also follows a global trend and adopts a model widely used in developed markets such as the United States and Europe. In addition, we believe the increase in data allowances satisfies the growing customer demand for larger data packages that allow accessvary according to the great variety of applications available for smartphones.

data plan, and include, among others: YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. Customers can include up to four additional lines and manage or share their data plan through our self-serve application,Minha Oi. Our premium plan subscription also includesOi LivrePlay allows flexibilitybundled with video streaming services. To increase our value proposition, in addition to our pre-paid consumers by offering monthly, weekly, daily and per-minute plans. Our monthly plan has a 300 minute allowance for calls to all Brazilian landlines and mobile subscribers, plus a 1GB data package and 500 text messages for R$40 per month. Our weekly plan includes a 75 minute allowance for calls to all Brazilian landlines and mobile subscribers, plus a 400MB data package and 300 text messages for R$10 per week. We also offer a weekly plan for those who still value unlimited on-net calls, which includes a 250MB data package and 300 text messages for R$8 per week. Our daily plan has unbundled voice and data packages, each of which is available for less than R$1 per day. Finally,services, we offer a per minute plan with 60 MB daily for data usagebundle premium content and text messages,services including newspapers, magazines and calls to any landline or mobile subscriber in Brazil for R$0.30 per minute. Our monthly and weekly plans have a higher ARPU relative to our other plans, and they help us to achieve the objectives set forth in the Transformation Plan. Since its launch,Oi Livre has acquired 6.2 million customers and, as of December31, 2015,Oi Livre represented 15.9% of our total pre-paid base.

Under our pre-paid voice plans, our customers may exchange the credits they purchase for additional services, such as:

Bônus Extra, which permits our customers to purchase additional minutes for local or long-distance calls to our fixed-line or mobile subscribers at discounted rates;

Pacote de Dados, which permits our customers to purchase a specified data allowance for use on their handsets; and

Pacote de SMS, which permits our customers to purchase the ability to send a specified number of text messages.

In keeping with the Transformation Plan’s focus on cost control and increasing profitability, throughout 2015 we disconnected inactive users of our pre-paid plans, which reduced FISTEL taxes, which are calculated based on the number of our active subscribers, resulting in an increase in the profitability of our customer base. We intend to continue to disconnect inactive users periodically.e-books.

Hybrid ServicesPlans

TheOur hybrid voice services market presentsplans present strategic value for our company because it combinesthey combine the advantages ofpre-paid offerings, such as the absence of bad debt and a favorable impact on working capital, with advantages of post-paid offerings, such as a heavier consumption profile.profile and higher ARPUs. We improve our revenues and market share through the offer of hybrid plans by consolidating customer recharges in our hybrid plans’ SIM cards and by improving the mix of offerings to the post-paid market.

In November 2015, we launchedWe offer theOi Mais Controle portfolio of plans for customers who wish to combine the cost savings of our post-paid plans with the self-imposed limits of ourpre-paid plans.Oi Mais Controle subscribers have similar benefits as theOi Mais customers, such as data packages with no usage restrictions, unlimited text messaging and (withunlimitedall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil, combined with the exceptionability of theOi Mais Controle BásicoLivreplan) all-net minutes customers to call customers of any operator anywhere in Brazil. We believe these new data packages, which contain morefreely switch between their data and no usage restrictions, will allow us to satisfyvoice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate using the growing demand from our customers for increased and unrestricted data usage.

TheOi Mais Controle plans range from R$34.90 per month to R$54.90 per month. They offer between 1GB and 2GB of data to be used freely (including on social networking sites), between 250 and 500 all-net minutes (with the exception of theOi Mais Controle Básico plan), and unlimited text messaging to customers of any operator (with the exception of theOi Mais Controle Básico plan). If customers require additional credits under theOi Mais Controle plans, they can be purchased through point of sale machines in retail stores, ATMs or mobile applications such asMinha Oi andRecarga Oi.application on their smartphones.

TheOi Mais Controle Básico plan allows customers to make unlimited local and long-distance calls to our mobile and fixed-line subscribers (on-net calls) and offers 1GB of data. Customers can also purchase credits that can be used for calls to customers of other providers (off-net calls) and other add-on services.

Until November 2015, we offered hybrid plans under the brand nameOi Controle, which lack bad debt risk and have a favorable impact on working capital.Oi Controle allows customers to make unlimited local and long-distance calls to our mobile and fixed-line subscribers (on-net calls) and purchase credits that can be used for calls to customers of other providers (off-net calls) and other add-on services.Oi Controle is composed of five plans. One of the plans,Oi Controle Voz, offers a credit of R$10.90 for customer use on a pay-as-you go plan in addition to the above benefits. The other four plans include mobile data, unlimited text messages to our mobile customers, limited voice and text message plans to customers of other operators and access to our Wi-Fi hotspots. In keeping with the Transformation Plan’s focus on cost control and profitability of the customer base, in the second half of 2015 we disconnected all inactive users of our hybridOi Controleplan, which reduced certain unnecessary costs. As of December 31, 2015,Oi Controlerepresented 41% of our total post-paid base.

Mobile Data Only Services

We offer post-paid and pre-paid mobile data communications services to customers who seek to access the internet through our network using mobile devices, including smartphones or tablets and laptop computers with the aid of a mini-modem. As with our post-paid voice plans, our post-paid mobile internet customers pay a monthly subscription fee and are billed on a monthly basis for services provided during the previous month. We also offer internet access for a daily fee to customers who do not subscribe to a monthly plan. In December 2014, we began the practice of blocking access to data services for pre-paid customers who exceeded their data allowances. For post-paid data packages, we continue to throttle the speed of service for customers who exceed their data allowances.

Post-Paid Services

We offer a variety of post-paid mobile data communications plans that provide data allowances from 300 MB to 10 GB for smartphones and from 300 MB to 10 GB for tablets and laptop computers and provide data transmission at speeds of 1 Mbps (3G network) or 5 Mbps (4G network). In addition to data traffic, our post-paid mobile internet plans for use with mobile devices include allowances for text messages. Our post-paid mobile internet plans for smartphones are available to ourOi Conta andOi Mais customers. Our post-paid mobile internet plans for tablets and laptop computers are sold on a stand-alone basis or, in some cases, through ourOi Conta Total voice and data bundle. Subscribers to our post-paid mobile internet plans for smartphones, tablets and laptop computers also receive free access to our network of Wi-Fi hotspots. In addition to these post-paid plans, subscribers can purchase anti-virus software and backup data storage services.

Pre-Paid Services

We offer two pre-paid mobile data communications plans: through mobile devices and through the purchase and installation of a SIM card in a mini-modem or tablet. Our pre-paid customers are able to add credits to their accounts through the purchase of pre-paid credits at prices that vary based on the data allowance purchased (from 5MB to 1GB) and duration (daily, weekly and monthly).

Value-Added Services

TheIn 2019, we continued to accelerate our digital transformation process, which included restructuring our value-added services under the following categories: (1) films and series; (2) education; (3) health; (4) written media; and (5) utilities. Within each category, we provide include voice, text and data applications, including voicemail, caller ID, and other services, such as personalization (video downloads, games, ring tones and wallpaper), text messaging subscription services (horoscope, soccer teams and love match), chat, mobile television, location-based services and applications (mobile banking, mobile search, email and instant messaging). Applications such ashighlight the ones described below contributed an increase in revenues fromfollowing value-added services during 2015.services:

Oi Apps ClubFilms and Series: A subscription-based marketplace for highly rated Android apps, Oi Apps Club provides customers unlimited access to download apps, charged to the customer’s Oi bill rather than a credit card.

Premium streaming services including HBO GO, FOX +, Telecine Play, Watch ESPN, Discovery Kids andColeção Oi.

Oi ConselheirosEducation: In this service, renowned and famous professionals in different areas of expertise known as “Oi’s Ambassadors” endorse exclusive content covering travel, fashion, cooking, celebrities and music, among others.

Oi Para Aprender: Oi’s mobile learning platform, which

Busuu: a language learning application offering 11 languages and a social network for users;

Oi Para Aprender:a learning platform that provides a variety of courses and tips regarding languages, entrance examinations, job assessments, how to develop a home office business and software lessons, among others; and

Descomplica: a premium learning streaming platform that provides high quality courses focused on the Brazilian university entrance examination.

Health

BT FIT: an automated personal trainer service that provides a variety of courses and exercises and creates personalized training program for the user; and

Saúde UP: a service that offers health content, as well as discounts in a wide network of pharmacies, medical exams and medical consultations, as well as a nurse on call.

Written Media

Oi Revistas: a service that provides online and downloadable access to hundreds of magazines from renowned publishers such as Globo, Abril, Editora Três and others; and

Oi Jornais: a service that provides online and downloadable access to various newspapers, as well as real time news notifications.

Utilities

Oi Apps Club:a subscription-based marketplace for highly rated Android apps, Oi Apps Club provides customers unlimited access to download apps, charged to the customer’s Oi bill rather than a credit card;

Oi Games Pro: a multiplatform gaming experience that offers unlimited games on mobile phones as well as a new computer game per month;

Truecaller: a caller ID service with the ability to block undesired calls; and

Oi Segurança: a service that offers a variety of functionality, such as antivirus, backup, device locator and parental controls, among others.

Our value-added services are developed by third-party application or content providers and offered to our customers. On average, these providers receive 35% of the net revenues generated by the services they develop and or provide to our customers.

SME and CorporateB2B Services

In the SME and corporate services marketour B2B Services business, we serve SME, corporate and corporate customers.governmental customers and other telecommunications providers. We offer a variety of services to theseour SME, corporate and governmental customers, including our core fixed-line, broadband and mobile services, as well as our value-added services, advanced voice services and commercial data transmission services. For our corporate customers, we also offer information technology services, such as network management and security, Smartoffice,storage, Smartcloud, anti-distributed denial of service andmachine-to-machine products, which enable communication between a product and its control center or database (such as a car and its GPS navigation system), in order to expand our revenue sources from corporate customers beyond voice services, increase customer loyalty and ensure greater revenue predictability.

The implementation We also provide specialized wholesale services, consisting of the Transformation Plan throughout 2015, coupled with the declining macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, has prompted certain changes in our portfoliosdata network services and recent offerings. SMEs are more vulnerable to economic instability than our more established corporate customers, so there has been a reduction in our SME customer base as a result of SMEs going out of business. Our corporate customers, while better able to survive the current economic instability, often respond by reducing their economic activityfacilities, interconnection, national and tightening their budgets for telecommunications productsinternational voice traffic transit and services.

In addition, in a move to better align our products with the needs of our consumers, and to increase customer satisfaction, we have taken a “back-to-basics” approach to product and service offerings and, as a result, developed simpler, more predictable flat-rate plans that enable the customer to better understand, project and plan for upcoming expenses. Furthermore, our sales focus has shifted to upgrading existing contracts, which has not required us to make any additional investments.roaming.

Services for SMEs

We offer SME services similar to those offered to our residential and personal mobility customers, including fixed-line and mobile voice services, and fixed-line and mobile broadband services. We also recently launched FTTH plans for SMEs in December 2015.SMEs. In addition, we offer SMEs:

 

advanced voice services, primarily 0800 (toll free) services, as well as voice portals where customers can participate in real-time chats and other interactive voice services;

 

dedicated internet connectivity and data network services; and

 

value-added services, such as help desk support that provides assistance for technical support issues, web services with hosting,e-mail tools and website builder and security applications.

In general, our sales team works with our SME customer to determine that customer’s telecommunications needs and negotiates a package of services and pricing structure that is best suited to its needs. In December 2015, we launchedOi Mais Empresas for SMEs.Oi Mais Empresasprovides 4G voice and mobile data and fixed-line (voice and broadband) services for a flat fee. This simplified portfolio is easier to understand, purchase and use, fostering a better relationship with the SME. The flat rate model eliminates billing issues and disputes and reduces the risk of default by the SME. Concurrently, as part of our digitalization efforts set forth in the Transformation Plan, we launched theOi Mais Empresas app, a fully digital customer channel through a smartphone application that can be downloaded at no cost at Apple Store or Google Play. TheOi Mais Empresas app provides exclusive service to SMEs, enabling them to acquire services, upgrade their contract plan and make requests and track the status of those requests, such as repairs and bill copies, among others, all using a smartphone. We made the same improvements and enabled the same functionalities as theOi Mais Empresas app on our website, enabling our customers to perform the same functions from a computer. The creation of theOi Mais Empresas app and website improvements, changed the way our customers communicate and reinforced our commitment to simplify our product portfolios and better understand our customers’ needs.

We continue to service our SME customers with a variety of legacy mobile plans, including ourOi Equipe Flat plan for groups of employees, ourOi Empresa Especial plan for individual users in an SME and ourOi Controle

plan which, similarly to our residential fixed-line plan, is designed to permit an SME to control usage of mobile minutes.

Services for Corporate Customers

We offer corporate customers all of the services offered to our SME customers. In addition, we provide a variety of customized, high-speed data transmission services through various technologies and means of access to corporate customers. Our principal data transmission services for Corporatecorporate customers are:

 

we act as the internet service provider for our Corporatecorporate customers, connecting their networks to the internet;

 

SLD, under which we lease dedicated lines to corporate customers for use in private networks that link different corporate websites; and

Dedicated Line Services (Serviços de Linhas Dedicadas), or SLD, under which we lease dedicated lines to corporate customers for use in private networks that link different corporate websites; and

 

IP services which consist of dedicated internet connection, as well as Virtual Private Network, or VPN, services that enable our customers to connect their private intranet and extranet networks to deliver videoconferencing, video/image transmission and multimedia applications.

We provide these services at data transmission speeds of 2 Mbps to 10100 Gbps.

We also offer information technology infrastructure services to our corporate customers, seeking to offer themend-to-end solutions through which we are able to provide and manage their connectivity and information technology needs. For example, we offerOi SmartCloud, a suite of data processing and data storage services that we perform through our five cyber data centers located in Brasília, São Paulo, Curitiba and Porto Alegre. In addition, through these data centers, we provide hosting, collocation and IT outsourcing services, permitting our customers to outsource their IT infrastructures to us or to use these centers to provide backup for their IT systems.

We also offer the following fourfive major service groups throughOi SmartCloud, which operate through our five cyber data centers:

 

collaborative solutions, a hosting and sharing platform that provides employees with access to company documents;

 

business applications, anin-memory computing platform for large amounts of data;

 

  

Oi GestãoMobilidade, a mobile device management service focused on providing logistics and security solutions relating to mobile devices; and

 

security,

Security services, a centralized, anti-spam filtering solution for corporate email.email; and

Telepresence as a Service (TPaaS), a video-conferencing service that allows collaboration among people at remote locations.

We also offer various services based on IT applications:

 

fleet management services, which provide a management system for fleet monitoring and location targeting, economies of scale for fuel costs, driver profile analysis and kilometer control for maintenance;

 

Interação Web, a digital marketing service, which allows us to implement on the website of our B2B Services customers an intelligent interaction with their digital users in real time;

workforce management, which provides a system with web and mobile applications to monitor and control the workforce in the field and optimize routes and control logistics activities; and

 

digital content management (corporate TV platform and queue management), which provides a digital signage platform with queue management solutions, creating a powerful marketing tool for companies that have interactions with customers at points of sale.

OurOi Smart Office service provides a system to control daily work and productivity of employees working remotely, including through the use of biometrics. The platform offers a connection between the home environment and the corporate network, providing unified communication options including chat, voice, video, conferencing and document sharing along with corporate applications for cloud computing.

In response to the reduced demand for traditional telecommunications services due to the challenging macroeconomic environment in Brazil, we have focused our new offerings in 2015 on information technology infrastructure services. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 15% of our corporate customers had contracted for at least one information technology service. In 2015, our revenues from information technology offerings increased as compared to 2014.

In order to provide complete solutions to our corporate clients, we have entered into service agreements for the joint supply of international data services with a number of important international data services providers. These commercial relationships with international data services providers are part of our strategy of offering telecommunications services packages to our customers.

Wholesale Services for Other Telecommunications Providers

We offer specialized services to other telecommunications providers, primarily consisting of interconnection to our networks, network usage charges for the use of portions of our long-distance network, traffic transportation through our physical infrastructure, and RAN sharing agreements.

Interconnection and Network Usage Charges

All telecommunications services providers in Brazil are required, if technically feasible, to make their networks available for interconnection on a non-discriminatory basis whenever a request is made by another telecommunications services provider. Interconnection permits a call originated on the network of a requesting local fixed-line, mobile or long-distance service provider’s network to be terminated on the local fixed-line or mobile services network of the other provider.

We are authorized to chargethe largest wholesale service provider in Brazil. We are responsible for providing services over the use of our local fixed-lineaccess network on a per-minute basis for (1) all calls terminated on our local fixed-line networks in Regions I and II that originate onover the networks of other mobile and long-distancelong distance network. Almost 2,000 service providers use our network to deliver services ranging from telephony and (2)broadband to high-speed data connections for businesses of all long-distance calls originated on our local fixed-line networks in Regions Isizes.

Our portfolio includes specialized services, consisting of data network services and II that are carried by other long-distance service providers.facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit, roaming and infrastructure sharing.

Conversely, other local fixed-line service providers charge us interconnection fees (1) to terminate calls on their local fixed-line networks that are originated on our mobile or long-distance networks, and (2) for long-distance calls originated on their local fixed-line networks that are carried by our long-distance network.

In addition, we charge network usage fees to long-distance service providers and operators of trunking services that connect switching stations to our local fixed-line networks. We are authorized to charge for the use of our long-distance network on a per-minute basis for all calls that travel through a portion of our long-distance networks for which the caller has not selected us as the long-distance provider. Conversely, other long-distance service providers charge us interconnection fees on a per-minute basis for all calls that travel through a portion of their long-distance networks for which the caller has selected us as the long-distance provider.

We are authorized to charge for the use of our mobile network on a per-minute basis for all calls terminated on our mobile network that originate on the networks of other local fixed-line, mobile and long-distance service providers. Conversely, other mobile services providers charge us interconnection fees to terminate calls on their mobile networks that are originated on our local fixed-line, mobile or long-distance networks. The amounts that we charge and owe for these interconnections with respect to SMEs have reduced dramatically, however, as a result of the recent reductions in interconnection tariffs mandated by ANATEL. The pricing for services to our corporate customers are not immediately affected by the ANATEL reductions. Rather, these rate reductions are only reflected in the negotiation and pricing of new contracts.

TransportationData Network Services and Facilities

We provide Industrial Exploitationservices referred to as industrial exploration of Dedicated Linesdedicated line (Exploração Industrial de Linha Dedicada), or EILD, pursuant to our concession agreement. The EILD consists of leased lines and clear channel protocols for the provision of services underto third parties.

In addition, we are able to offer a complete portfolio of wholesale products, includingfiber-to-the-x, or FTTx, solutions, IP, Ethernet and Multi-Protocol Label Switching, or MPLS. All of these products are used to meet the demands of other network operators and regional internet providers. The circuits are requested with different service level agreements; and we are required to provide the facilities with contingency routes, sites and equipment to improve the service against points of failure.

Interconnection

As part of our wholesale services, we provide interconnection services to users of other network providers. The interconnection is a link between compatible telecommunications networks which permits that a fixed or mobile service user of one network can adequately communicate with the users of a network from another provider. All providers of telecommunication services (fixed or mobile) are required to provide interconnection upon request to any other telecommunication collective service provider. The interconnection agreements are negotiated according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL.

Voice Traffic Transit

We offer national and international voice traffic transit that meets all our customers’ expectations and satisfies the dynamic needs of the telecommunications market. Direct interconnections with the major national and international telecommunication carriers, as well as most small carriers, ensure high-quality voice traffic transit in Brazil.

Roaming

We provide Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM, roaming in Brazil to national and international mobile operators. Our roaming agreements enables mobile users to automatically make and receive voice calls, send and receive SMS as well as access internet service while traveling outside the geographical coverage area of their own home network by using our mobile network.

Marketing and Distribution

We focus our marketing efforts on the upselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Oi” brand through our convergent services offerings and promotion of ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our B2B Services business.

We strive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we lease trunk linesadjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the goal of improving traffic to our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we used traditional advertising mediums, such as cable and network television and radio to increase our presence and the reach of our branding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to grow sales of our FTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media tools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of events, athletes and influencers to increase brand awareness and demonstrate our credibility.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services providers, primarily mobile services providers, which use these trunk lines to link their radio base stations to their switching centers.

Long-distance and mobile services providers may avoid paying long-distance network usage charges to us by establishing an interconnection to our local fixed-line networks. In order to retain thesemarket: (1) residential customers, including customers of our long-distance services, we offer a long-distance usage service, called national transportation, under which we provide discounts to our long-distance network usage fees based on the volume of traffic and geographic distribution of calls generated by a long-distance or mobile services provider.to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our distribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, including voice, broadband services andOi TV, and post-paid mobile services. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

our own network of stores, which included 125 “Oi” branded stores;

508 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

6,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us;

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of 1,400 sales representatives that answer more than 314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to proactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media;

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of 679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers;

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of 2,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are not reachable by telemarketing; and

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services were:

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

524 stores that are part of large national chains that sell our post-paid andpre-paid Personal Mobility Services and SIM cards;

approximately nine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets;

our telemarketing sales channel has 1,832 sales representatives that answer more than 659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

B2B Services

We also offer international telecommunications service providershave established separate distribution channels to serve SME and corporate customers. As of December 31, 2019, the optionprincipal distribution channels that we use to terminate their Brazilian inbound trafficmarket our services to SMEs were:

Oi” exclusive agents with 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers;

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of two agents that use sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes customer retention representatives; and

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers through our network, as an alternativeown direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to Embrateldiscuss the business needs of these enterprises and TIM. We charge international telecommunicationsdesign solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service providers a per-minute rate, basedmodel focuses on whether a call terminates on a fixed-line or mobile telephonepost-sale service and the locationwe regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of the local areaDecember 31, 2019, our corporate sales team, excluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 326 employees operating in which the call terminates.10 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line services,and domestic long-distance services, mobile services,plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATEL,ANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to certain exceptions relating toANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates we charge under alternative fixed-linefor DTH and mobile plans that weIP TV services are authorizednot subject to offerANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our customers. For information on ANATEL regulation of our rates, see “—Telecommunications Regulation—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

ManyBilling and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the relevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls is imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We are a leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2019, we had a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape we face relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas application and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. Our network supports next generation ADSL and VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ allows data transmission at speeds of up to 20 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission at speeds of up to 35 Mbps downstream and 3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. As of December 31, 2019, our FTTH network reached more than 4.6 million homes passed, and approximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020.

Mobile devices access our GSM, or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 1800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 42.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 and 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and carrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Although currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks, we are initiating Voice over LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the neighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designated to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TP networks are fully integrated to management systems and provide:

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of our optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. Our fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. In the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an additional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. This year, we expect to further extend our OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to reach 26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we began to expand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the cities of Goiânia and Brasília. As demand increases, more expansions of our 200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to replace our existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our network and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet-dedicated services and VPN offerings through access routers, for customer aggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of services aggregation over a single box), allowing us to reduce capital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peering links and international links that we maintain in the United States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and III and all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and III.

IPTV Network

Through our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services in 86 cities in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2019. For subscribers of ourOi TV services, through our DTH or FTTH networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and computers).

Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was R$38,911 million. As of December 31, 2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 5.5%; (5) buildings represented 3.9%; (6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 2.6%; and (7) other fixed assets represented 2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 21 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and SDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Automatic Switching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through MSANs or DSLAMs to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to our aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2019:

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 12,622 active radio base stations covering 1,018 municipalities, or 75% of the urban population of Brazil;

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,350 active radio base stations covering 1,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 14,019 active radio base stations covering 3,497 municipalities, or 94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we modernized our core network, with a focus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less and we invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep up with the growing demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of network problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoption of the single-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using carrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and aligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not historically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us to offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply in our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

We have entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our Personal Mobility Services on an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our fixed-line services on an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers.

The monthly payments under two of our operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. The monthly payments, under the remainder of the operating lease agreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA.

The operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 2029 and are automatically renewable for successiveone-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

4G Network

As of the date of this annual report, we are party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the same physical network, thus reducing the deployment costs while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement with TIM to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with Telefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and Telefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covered 31 cities in 2015, 171 cities in 2016 and 427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

43 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Agreements for Network Equipment and Services

In 2018, we entered into agreements with strategic suppliers to acquire equipment and services to support the modernization of network technologies for the expansion of mobile telephone service coverage and fiber optic broadband capacity. These projects are designed to modernize and consolidate our mobile network technologies, permitting our gradual use of our 2G and 3G frequencies to provide 4.5G services in all municipalities currently served by our mobile network and prepare our network for the implementation of 5G technology and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions. Under this agreement, we expect to acquire equipment and services from Huawei over the next five years.

Network Maintenance

Our external plant and equipment maintenance, installation and network servicing are performed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., or Serede, as well as one third-party service provider, Telemont. We employ our own team of technicians for our internal plant and equipment maintenance.

Insourced Network Maintenance

In May 2013 and June 2013, we insourced our installation, operations, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our fixed-line telecommunications services, mobile telecommunications services, data transmission services (including broadband access services), satellite services, buildings, access ways and towers. These services had previously been provided by Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda. and Alcatel-Lucent Brasil S.A.

In June 2016, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of A.R.M. Engenharia and changed its corporate name to Rede Conecta – Serviços de Rede S.A. In November 2018, Rede Conecta merged into Serede. Through Serede we perform installation, operation and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services).

Outsourced Network Maintenance

In October 2017, we entered into services agreements with Telemont for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Rondônia and Goiás and the Federal District. The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in October 2022, are approximately R$4.2 billion.

Research and Development

We conduct independent innovation, research and development in areas of telecommunications services but historically we have not independently developed new telecommunications technologies. We depend primarily on suppliers of telecommunications equipment for the development of new technology. Our investments in innovation, research and development totaled R$34 million during 2019, R$17 million during 2018 and R$16 million during 2017.

Joint Venture, Associated Companies and AssetsHeld-For-Sale

Joint Venture

We own 19.04% of the share capital of Hispamar, aSpanish-Brazilian enterprise created in November 1999 by Hispasat (the leading satellite telecommunications provider in the Iberian Peninsula), and our company. Hispamar operates the Amazonas 2 and Amazonas 3 satellites. In December 2002, we entered into an agreement with Hispasat that granted and transferred to Hispamar the rights to exploit geostationary orbital position 61 degrees west, and we acquired a minority equity stake in Hispamar.

In 2009, the Amazonas 2 satellite was launched and this satellite commenced commercial operations in early 2010. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders andon-board switching, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 2 satellite is owned by a subsidiary of Hispasat and Hispamar has been granted the right to operate and lease all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

In 2013, the Amazonas 3 satellite was launched and commenced commercial operations. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 3 satellite is owned by Hispamar, which operates and leases all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

Associated Company

We own 50% of Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., or AIX. AIX provides infrastructure services to our company and is engaged in the construction of ductwork for the installation of fiber optic cables along highways in the State of São Paulo.

AssetsHeld-for-Sale

Our board of directors has authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel and TPT—Telecomunicações Públicas de Timor, S.A., or TPT. As a result, we record the assets and liabilities of Africatel and TPT asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel or TPT as discontinued operations in our income statement due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel and TPT on our results of operations.

Africatel

Africatel was formed in May 2006 and indirectly holds our equity interests in CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A.R.L., or CST, and Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda., or Directel. We own 86% of the share capital of Africatel.

CST

Africatel indirectly owns 51% of the share capital of CST, a provider of fixed and mobile services in São Tomé and Principe, that was established in 1989 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a20-year license granted in 2007.

Directel

Africatel indirectly owns 100% of the share capital of Directel, a Portuguese entity with subsidiaries in Angola, Cabo Verde, Mozambique, and Kenya, which publish telephone directories and operate related data bases in those countries.

TPT

We own 76.14% of the share capital of TPT, a Portuguese holding company that owns 54.01% of the share capital of Timor Telecom, S.A., or Timor Telecom, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste in Asia. Our wholly-owned subsidiary PT Participações also holds 3.05% of the share capital of Timor Telecom.

Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

Overview

Our business, including the nature of the services we provide and the rates we charge, is subject to comprehensive regulation under the General Telecommunications Law, and a comprehensive regulatory framework for the provision of telecommunications services promulgated by ANATEL. We provide fixed-line, domestic and international long-distance, mobile telecommunications, data transmission andPay-TV services under concessions, authorizations and licenses that were granted by ANATEL and allow us to provide specified services in designated geographic areas, as well as set forth certain obligations with which we must comply.

ANATEL is an administratively independent and financially autonomous regulatory agency that was established in July 1997 pursuant to the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL Regulation (Regulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). ANATEL oversees our activities and enforces the General Telecommunications Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. ANATEL is required to report on its activities to the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações), and has authority to propose and to issue regulations that are legally binding on telecommunications service providers. ANATEL also has the authority to grant concessions and licenses for all telecommunications services, other than broadcasting services. In addition, ANATEL is authorized to direct and control the provision of services, the shareholding structure of service providers, to apply penalties and to declare the expiration of the concession and authorizations and the return of assets from the concessionaire to the government authority upon termination of the concession. Any regulation or action proposed by ANATEL is subject to a per-minute basis. Forperiod of public comment, which may include public hearings, and ANATEL’s decisions may be challenged administratively before the agency itself or through the Brazilian judicial system.

The current regulatory framework for the Brazilian telecommunications industry was adopted in 1998. Under the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL regulations, the right to provide telecommunications services is granted either through a concession under the public regime (as discussed below) or an authorization under the private regime (as discussed below). A concession is granted for a fixed period of time following a public auction and is generally renewable. An authorization is granted for an indeterminate period of time and public auctions are held for some authorizations. These concessions and authorizations allow service providers to provide specific services in designated geographic areas, set forth certain obligations with which the service providers must comply and require equal treatment of customers by the service providers.

The three principal providers of fixed-line telecommunications services in Brazil, Telefônica Brasil, Claro and our company, provide these services under the public regime. In addition, CTBC and Sercomtel, which are secondary local fixed-line telecommunications service providers, operate under the public regime. All of the other providers of fixed-line telecommunications services and all providers of personal mobile services and data transmission services in Brazil operate under the private regime.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. For more information, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Public Regime

Overview

Providers of public regime services are subject to more obligations and restrictions than providers of private regime services. Under Brazilian law, providers of public regime services are subject to certain requirements with respect to services such as network expansion and network modernization. Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the PGMU, which was most recently updated in December 2018. For more information about the PGMU and our obligations thereunder, see “—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

In addition, public regime service providers, as well as private regime service providers, are required to comply with the provisions of: (1) the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013 and was partially superseded by the RQUAL in December 2019; and (2) the General Plan on Competition Targets (Plano Geral de Metas de Competição), or PGMC, which was adopted by ANATEL in November 2012 and updated in July 2018. For more information about the RGQ, the RQUAL and the PGMC see “ —Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ),” “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)” and “ —Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

The rates that public regime service providers may charge for callscustomers are subject to ANATEL supervision. Another distinctive feature of public concessions is the right of the concessionaire to maintain certain economic and financial standards, which are calculated based on the rules set forth in the concession agreements and were designed based on a price cap model. For more information, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Rate Regulation.”

Concessions are granted for 20 years.Whereas prior to the passage of Law No. 13,897, only one20-year renewal period was allowed, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of use. The charge unit is a tenththem under the applicable concession. ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of certain events described below under “—Termination of a minute (six seconds)Concession.” The modification right permits ANATEL to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. ANATEL is obligated to engage in public consultation in connection with each of these potential modifications.

General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU)

The PGMU sets forth the principal network expansion and modernization obligations of the public regime providers. The PGMU was approved by Decree No. 9,619 and became effective on December 21, 2018, the date when it was published in the Official Gazette.

Public regime providers are subject to network expansion requirements under the PGMU, which are revised by ANATEL from time to time. No subsidies or other supplemental financings are anticipated to finance our network expansion obligations. Our failure to meet the network expansion and modernization obligations established by the PGMU or in our concession agreements may result in fines and penalties of up to R$50 million for eachnon-compliance with an obligation or rule as verified in an administrative process, as well as potential revocation of our concessions.

The PGMU requires the following, among other things:

local fixed-line service providers to provide individual access to fixed-line voice services to economically disadvantaged segments of the Brazilian population within their service areas, through programs to be established and regulated by ANATEL;

local fixed-line service providers to install public telephones on demand in locations with more than 100 inhabitants;

local fixed-line service providers to install fixed lines in locations with more than 300 inhabitants (1) in regions where there is no fixed line installed, within 120 days of a request and (2) in regions where fixed lines are already installed, within 7 days of a request for 90% of requests and in up to 25 days of a request for the remaining 10% of requests; and

local fixed-line service providers to gradually provide voice access in the wireless local loop technology with capacity for 4G services in 1,400 locations (of which 1,155 apply to Oi), and rounding is permittedaccording to the next succeeding tenthfollowing schedule: 10% of such locations by December 31, 2019; 25% by December 31, 2020; 45% by December 31, 2021; 70% by December 31, 2022; and 100% by December 31, 2023.

Similarly to the 2008 amendments to the PGMU that eliminated the requirements to provide public telephone centers (postos de serviço telefônico) in exchange for building backhaul, the 2018 PGMU eliminated the requirements to provide multifacility service centers (postos de serviço multifacilidade), which are public centers located in rural areas that offer various telecommunications services, including voice, access to the internet and digital transmission of text and images, and to install and maintain public telephones within a fixed-line service concession, in exchange for other obligations to be defined.

The value of the obligations currently imposed by the PGMU and, therefore, the cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, is subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation.

Termination of a minute. ThereConcession

ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of any of the following:

an extraordinary situation jeopardizing the public interest, in which case the Brazilian government is authorized to start rendering the services set forth under the concession in lieu of the concessionaire, subject to congressional authorization and payment of adequate indemnification to the owner of the terminated concession;

termination by the provider (through an agreement with ANATEL or pursuant to legal proceedings) as a minimum chargeconsequence of an act or omission of the Brazilian government that makes the rendering of the services excessively burdensome to the provider;

annulment of the concession due to a contractual term, which is deemed by subsequent law to be illegal;

material failure to comply with the provider’s universalization targets;

failure to meet insurance requirements set forth in the concession agreement;

asplit-up,spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the provider’s control without ANATEL’s authorization;

the transfer of the concession without ANATEL’s authorization;

the dissolution or bankruptcy of the provider; or

an extraordinary situation in which Brazilian government intervention, although legally permissible, is not undertaken, as such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in an unfair benefit to the provider.

In the event a concession is terminated, ANATEL is authorized to administer the provider’s properties and its employees in order to continue rendering services.

Service Restrictions

Public regime service providers are subject to certain restrictions on alliances, joint ventures and mergers and acquisitions with other public regime providers, including:

a prohibition on members of the same economic group holding more than two licenses for the provision of telecommunications services in the public regime, which would include holding more than 20% of the voting shares of or controlling (as such term is defined under ANATEL’s regulations) more than two providers of public regime telecommunications services; and

a restriction, as set forth in the General Grant Plan (Plano General de Outorgas), or PGO, on mergers between providers of public regime telecommunications services.

In September 2011, Law No. 12,485 became effective, which creates a new legal framework for subscription television services in Brazil, and determines, among other provisions to:

allow fixed-line telephone concessionaires, such as us, to enter the cable television market in Brazil;

remove existing restrictions on foreign capital investments in cable television providers;

limit the total and voting capital held by broadcast concessionaires and authorized providers, and in television programmers and producers, with headquarters in Brazil to 30%; and

prohibit telecommunications service providers with collective interests from acquiring rights to disseminate images of events of national interest and from hiring domestic artistic talent.

Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law. Law No. 13,879 will allow providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime, including the inability of providers to sell certain property, plant and equipment used to provide fixed-line telephone services. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations, such as the methodology for calculating the cost of investments that providers will need to undertake as well as deadlines to complete the conversions. A draft of the new form of authorization agreement was also provided. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, seconds for every call. 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Private Regime

Providers of private regime services, although not generally subject to the requirements concerning continuity and universality of service and network modernization, are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their respective authorizations and applicable regulation.

For example, private regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the RGQ and the PGMC. For more information about the RGQ and the PGMC, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ)” and “—Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

Our Services

Fixed-Line Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

We provide the majority of our fixed-line telephone services (Serviço Telefônico Fixo Comutado—STFC) in accordance with concession agreements under the public regime. For more information about the regulations applicable to public regime telephone service providers, see “—Public Regime.”

Our Concessions and Authorizations

The following table sets forth certain details of our concessions and authorizations to provide local, domestic long-distance and international long-distanced fixed-line telephone services:

Geographic Scope

Type of Service

Termination Date

Regime

Region I of the PGO – States of Rio De Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraiba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, Maranhão, Pará, Amapá, Amazonas e Roraima, except Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region I of the PGO – Sector 3(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region II of the PGO – States of Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande Do Sul, except for Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region II of the PGO—Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region III of the PGO – São PauloLocal / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
NationalInternational Long DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization

(1)

Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO corresponds to 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais.

(2)

Concession agreements may be amended by the parties every five years prior to their termination date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Our concession agreements were last amended in 2011. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

(3)

Sectors 20, 22 and 25 of Region II of the PGO correspond to the following municipalities: Londrina, Paraná; Tamarana, Paraná; (Sector 22) Paranaíba, Mato Grosso do Sul (Sector 25); Buriti Alegre, Goiás; Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás; Inaciolândia, Goiás; Itumbiara, Goiás; Paranaiguara, Goiás; and São Simão, Goiás.

Each of our concession agreements:

sets forth the parameters that govern adjustments to our rates;

requires us to comply with the network expansion obligations set forth in the PGMU;

requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year;

In addition, each of our concession and authorization agreements:

sets forth the conditions under which ANATEL may access information from us;

requires us to comply with certain quality of service obligations as well as the quality of service obligations set forth in the RGQ;

requires us to pay fines for anynon-compliance with the regulatory rules including systemic service interruptions.

In addition, the PGMU requires us to provide transmission lines connecting our fiber-optic internet backbones to municipalities in our concession areas in which we did not provide internet service, which we refer to as backhaul. Under these concession agreements, we are obligated to set up backhaul in 3,188 municipalities in Regions I and II. The facilities that we constructed to meet these obligations are considered to be property that is part of our concessions and will therefore revert to the Brazilian government on January 1, 2026. For more information about the PGMU, see “—Public Regime—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line calls during off-peak hours, charges applytelecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on a per-call basis, regardless the durationApril 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the call.date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law.”

Fixed-Line RatesIn addition, in connection with the consideration of revisions to the concession agreements under the public regime, in January 2017, ANATEL proposed revisions to the terms of the PGO, in line with the provisions of PLC 79 (the bill that preceded Law No. 13, 789). However, despite the passage of Law No. 13,789, we cannot predict when and to what extent ANATEL will revise the PGO.

We cannot assure you that the implementation of Law No. 13,879 or any future amendments to our concession agreements (including renewals) or the PGO will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the migration of our concessions to the private regime or the amendments to our concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Rate Regulation

Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to offer basic local fixed-line plans to users. Rates for the basic long-distance services plan originated and terminated on fixed lines vary in accordance with certain criteria. The concession agreements establish aprice-cap mechanism for annual rate adjustments for basic service plans and basic domestic long-distance plans based on formulas set forth in each provider’s concession agreement. The formula provides for two adjustments to the price cap based on the local rate basket, the long-distance rate basket and the use of a price index. The price cap is first revised upward to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by an index, then ANATEL applies a productivity discount factor, or Factor X, which reduces the impact of the rate readjustment provided by the index.

Factor X is equal to (1) 50% of the increase in the productivity rate of public regime providers, plus (2) 75% of a factor calculated by ANATEL that is designed to reflect cost optimization targets for the telecommunications industry as a whole. If the weighted average productivity rate is negative, ANATEL will not allow an annual adjustment in excess of the IST.

A provider may increase rates for individual services within the local rate basket or the long-distance rate basket by up to 5% more than the IST so long as the rates for other services in that rate basket are reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that the weighted average increase for the entire rate basket does not exceed the permitted annual rate adjustment.

A provider may also offer alternative plans in addition to the basic service plan. Alternative plans must be submitted for ANATEL’s approval. The rates offered under the alternative plans may be adjusted annually based on the IST.

Marketing and Distribution

We focus our marketing efforts on the upselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Local RatesOi” brand through our convergent services offerings and promotion of ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our B2B Services business.

We strive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we adjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the goal of improving traffic to our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we used traditional advertising mediums, such as cable and network television and radio to increase our presence and the reach of our branding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to grow sales of our FTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media tools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of events, athletes and influencers to increase brand awareness and demonstrate our credibility.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services market: (1) residential customers, including customers of our mobile services to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our revenues from localdistribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, consist mainly of monthly subscription charges, charges for local callsincluding voice, broadband services and charges for the activation of lines for new subscribers or subscribers that have changed addresses. Monthly subscription charges are based on the plan to which the customer subscribesOi TV, and whether the customer is a residential, commercial or trunk line customer.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan, each of which includes installation charges, monthly subscription charges, and charges for local minutes. The monthly subscription fees under the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan vary in accordance with the subscribers’ profiles, as defined in the applicable ANATEL regulations.post-paid mobile services. As of December 31, 2015, 13.6%2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

our own network of stores, which included 125 “Oi” branded stores;

508 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

6,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us;

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of 1,400 sales representatives that answer more than 314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to proactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media;

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of 679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers;

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of 2,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are not reachable by telemarketing; and

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services were:

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

524 stores that are part of large national chains that sell our post-paid andpre-paid Personal Mobility Services and SIM cards;

approximately nine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets;

our telemarketing sales channel has 1,832 sales representatives that answer more than 659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

B2B Services

We have established separate distribution channels to serve SME and corporate customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we use to market our services to SMEs were:

Oi” exclusive agents with 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers;

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of two agents that use sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes customer retention representatives; and

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers through our own direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to discuss the business needs of these enterprises and design solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service model focuses on post-sale service and we regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of December 31, 2019, our corporate sales team, excluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 326 employees operating in 10 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line and domestic long-distance plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our rates, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

Billing and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers subscribeda monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the Basic Planrelevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls is imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per Minutemonth plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We are a leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2019, we had a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape we face relating to the Mandatory Alternativefixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas application and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. Our network supports next generation ADSL and VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ allows data transmission at speeds of up to 20 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission at speeds of up to 35 Mbps downstream and 3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. As of December 31, 2019, our FTTH network reached more than 4.6 million homes passed, and approximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020.

Mobile devices access our GSM, or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 1800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service Plan.(GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 42.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 and 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and carrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Although currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks, we are initiating Voice over LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the Basic Plan per Minuteneighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan, we are permitted to offer non-discriminatory alternative plans to the basic service plans. The rates for applicable services under these plans (e.g., monthly subscription rates and charges for local and long-distance calls) must be submitted for ANATEL approval prior to the offeringcity of those plans to our customers. In general, ANATEL does not raise objections to the terms of these plans.Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2015, 86.4%2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our local fixed-linenetwork that use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers subscribed to alternative plans.MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designated to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TP networks are fully integrated to management systems and provide:

On

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of our optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. Our fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. In the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum rates thatadditional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. This year, we are permittedexpect to charge forfurther extend our basic service plans. ANATEL increased the rates that we may charge by an averageOTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to reach 26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of 0.55% as of February 8,

2013, decreased the rates that we may charge by an average of 0.10% as of April 18, 2014, and increased the rates that we may charge by an average of 3.6% as of June 13, 2015.optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we are authorizedbegan to adjustexpand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the rates applicable to our alternative plans annually by nocities of Goiânia and Brasília. As demand increases, more than the rate of inflation, as measured by the IST. Discounts from the rates set in basic service plans and alternative service plans may be granted to customers without ANATEL approval.

Local Fixed Line-to-Mobile Rates (VC-1) and Mobile Long Distance Rates (VC-2 and VC-3)

When oneexpansions of our fixed-line customers makes a call200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to a mobile subscriberreplace our existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our company or another mobilenetwork and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet-dedicated services provider that terminates in the mobile registration area in which the call was originated, we charge our fixed-lineand VPN offerings through access routers, for customer per-minute charges for the durationaggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of the call based on rates designated by ANATEL as VC-1 rates. In turn, we pay the mobile services provideraggregation over a per-minute charge based on rates designated by ANATEL as VU-M rates for the use of its mobile network in completing the call. Rates for long-distance calls that originate or terminate on mobile telephones are based on whether the call is an intrasectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL as VC-2 rates, or an intersectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL as VC-3 rates. If the caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for the call, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates. VC-1, VC-2 and VC-3 rates, collectively, the “VC Rates” vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on a per-minute basis.

On an annual basis, ANATEL may increase or decrease the maximum VC Rates that we are permitted to charge. In February 2012, ANATEL orderedsingle box), allowing us to reduce our VC Rates by approximately 10%, althoughcapital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peering links and international links that we are appealingmaintain in the timingUnited States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of the application of this rate decrease to our company as our VC Rates was increased in Region I by 1.54% in accordance with our application for this increase in February 2012.

ANATEL has changed our VC-1 rates as follows:

In February 2014, reduced by approximately 18% and 33.5%all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and II, respectively.

In August 2014, increased by approximately 1.5%III and 3.3%all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and II, respectively.
III.

IPTV Network

In February 2015, reduced by approximately 21.8%

Through our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services in 86 cities in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2019. For subscribers of ourOi TV services, through our DTH or FTTH networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and 21.3% in Regions I and II, respectively.

In August 2015, increased by approximately 5.5% in Regions I and II.

ANATEL has changed our VC-2 and VC-3 rates as follows:computers).

 

In February 2014, reduced our VC-2 rate by 12.1%

Property, Plant and 27.5% in Regions I and II, respectively, and reduced our VC-3 rate by approximately 10.6% and 26.4% in Regions I and II, respectively.

In August 2014, increased both our VC-2 and VC-3 rates by approximately 1.5% and 3.1% in Regions I and II, respectively.

In February 2015, reduced our VC-2 rate by 13.6% and 12.4% in Regions I and II, respectively, and reduced our VC-3 rate by approximately 11.8% and 10.8% in Regions I and II, respectively.

In August 2015, increased both our VC-2 and VC-3 rates by approximately 5.5% in Regions I and II.

As a result of the substantial reductions in VC Rates over the past several years, and in keeping with our strategy of simplifying our portfolios to enhance the customer experience, in 2015 we launched several fixed-line and mobile plans that allow all-net calls for a flat fee. All-net plans eliminate the effect of VC Rate reductions on our customers’ telephone bills and simplify the billing process.

Equipment

Fixed Line-to-Fixed-Line Long Distance Rates

If a caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for a long-distance call that originates and terminates on fixed-line telephones, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates. Rates for these long-distance calls are based on the physical distance separating callers (which are categorized by four distance ranges), time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on a per-minute basis for the duration of the call. Rates on these calls are applied on a per-minute basis.

On an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum domestic fixed line-to-fixed line long-distance rates that we are permitted to charge. ANATEL increased the rates that our company and Telemar may charge by an average of 0.55% as of February 8, 2013, 0.65% as of April 18, 2014, and 3.6% as of June 13, 2015. Discounts from the domestic fixed line-to-fixed line long-distance rates approved by ANATEL may be granted to customers without ANATEL approval.

Mobile Rates

Mobile telecommunications service in Brazil, unlike in the United States, is offered on a “calling-party-pays” basis under which a mobile subscriber pays only for calls that he or she originates (in addition to roaming charges paid on calls made or received outside the subscriber’s home registration area). A mobile subscriber receiving a collect call is also required to pay mobile usage charges.

Our revenues from mobile services consist mainly of charges for local and long-distance calls paid by our pre-paid and post-paid mobile subscribers and monthly subscription charges paid by our post-paid plan subscribers. Monthly subscription charges are based on a post-paid subscriber’s service plan. If one of our mobile subscribers places or receives a call from a location outside of his or her home registration area, we are permitted to charge that customer the applicable roaming rate. We offer basic service plans (post-paid and pre-paid), as well as non-discriminatory alternatives to the basic service plans. As of December 31, 2015, fewer than 1%2019, the net book value of our mobile customers subscribedproperty, plant and equipment was R$38,911 million. As of December 31, 2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 5.5%; (5) buildings represented 3.9%; (6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 2.6%; and (7) other fixed assets represented 2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 16 to our basic plans (post-paid or pre-paid); substantiallyaudited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 21 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our post-paidnetwork that use ATM and pre-paidSDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, subscribed to non-discriminatory alternative plansMPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the basic service plans.bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Although subscribersAutomatic Switching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through MSANs or DSLAMs to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of a plan cannot be forcedDecember 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to migrate to new plans, existing plans may be discontinued as long as all subscribersour aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2019:

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 12,622 active radio base stations covering 1,018 municipalities, or 75% of the discontinued plan receiveurban population of Brazil;

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,350 active radio base stations covering 1,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 14,019 active radio base stations covering 3,497 municipalities, or 94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we modernized our core network, with a noticefocus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to that effectdo more with less and are allowedwe invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to migratekeep up with the growing demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to new plans within six monthsa variety of such notice.projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We charge for all mobile calls made byare engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our pre-paidfixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and for mobile calls made byup to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our post-paid customersaccess networks, we have been engaged in excessa program of their allocated monthly numberdeploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of minutes,our networks that used ATM and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on a per-minute basis.

Rates under our mobile plans may be adjusted annually by nooptical transport network technology in order to provide more than the rate of inflation, as measured by the IGP-DI. These rate adjustments occur on the anniversary dates of the approval of the specific plans. Discounts from the rates set in basic service plans and alternative service plans may be granted to customers without ANATEL approval. The rate of inflation as measured by the IGP-DI was 5.5% in 2013, 3.8% in 2014, and 10.7% in 2015.

Network Usage (Interconnection) Rates

Fixed-Line Networks

Our revenues from theefficient use of our local fixed-line networks consist primarilyDWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of payments on a per-minute basis, whicheach type of access network, expedites the resolution of network problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are charged at rates designated by ANATEL as TU-RL rates, from:

long-distance service providerscontinuing to complete calls terminating onsimplify our local fixed-line networks;

long-distance service providers fortransport network architecture through the transfer to their networks of calls originating on our local fixed-line networks; and

mobile services providers to complete calls terminating on our local fixed-line networks.

Fixed-line service providers are not permitted to charge other fixed-line service providers for local fixed-line calls originating on their local fixed-line networks and terminating on the other provider’s local fixed-line networks. TU-RL rates vary depending on the timeadoption of the daysingle-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and dayresidential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using carrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the week,project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and are applied onaligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a per-minute basis.

Our revenues from the use of our long-distance networks consist primarily of payments on a per-minute basis, which are charged at rates designated by ANATEL as TU-RIU rates, from other long-distance carriers that useproject to upgrade a portion of our long-distancemobile networks to complete calls initiated by callers thatenable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not selectedhistorically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us asto offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the long-distance provider. TU-RIU ratesincreased demand for intrasectorial calls are designated by ANATEL as TU-RIU1 rates,long distance traffic, both domestic and TU-RIU rates for intersectorial calls are designated by ANATEL as TU-RIU2 rates.

TU-RIU rates vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on a per-minute basis. Since January 1, 2013, the TU-RIU rates of Oi and Telemar have been equal to 20% of their respective domestic fixed line-to-fixed line long-distance rates for such calls.

In July 2014, ANATEL approved a rule for the definition of maximum fixed reference rates, including TU-RL and TU-RIU, for entities with significant market power, such as our company, based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Under this rule, TU-RL and TU-RIU reference rates will decline from 2016international, through 2019 when TU-RL and TU-RIU reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply.

Mobile Networks

Our revenues from the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply in our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

We have entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our Personal Mobility Services on an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our fixed-line services on an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers.

The monthly payments under two of our operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. The monthly payments, under the remainder of the operating lease agreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA.

The operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 2029 and are automatically renewable for successiveone-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

4G Network

As of the date of this annual report, we are party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the same physical network, thus reducing the deployment costs while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement with TIM to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with Telefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and Telefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covered 31 cities in 2015, 171 cities in 2016 and 427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

43 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Agreements for Network Equipment and Services

In 2018, we entered into agreements with strategic suppliers to acquire equipment and services to support the modernization of network technologies for the expansion of mobile telephone service coverage and fiber optic broadband capacity. These projects are designed to modernize and consolidate our mobile network technologies, permitting our gradual use of our 2G and 3G frequencies to provide 4.5G services in all municipalities currently served by our mobile network and prepare our network for the implementation of 5G technology and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions. Under this agreement, we expect to acquire equipment and services from Huawei over the next five years.

Network Maintenance

Our external plant and equipment maintenance, installation and network servicing are performed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., or Serede, as well as one third-party service provider, Telemont. We employ our own team of technicians for our internal plant and equipment maintenance.

Insourced Network Maintenance

In May 2013 and June 2013, we insourced our installation, operations, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our fixed-line telecommunications services, mobile telecommunications services, data transmission services (including broadband access services), satellite services, buildings, access ways and towers. These services had previously been provided by Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda. and Alcatel-Lucent Brasil S.A.

In June 2016, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of A.R.M. Engenharia and changed its corporate name to Rede Conecta – Serviços de Rede S.A. In November 2018, Rede Conecta merged into Serede. Through Serede we perform installation, operation and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks consist(including broadband access services).

Outsourced Network Maintenance

In October 2017, we entered into services agreements with Telemont for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Rondônia and Goiás and the Federal District. The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in October 2022, are approximately R$4.2 billion.

Research and Development

We conduct independent innovation, research and development in areas of telecommunications services but historically we have not independently developed new telecommunications technologies. We depend primarily on suppliers of paymentstelecommunications equipment for the development of new technology. Our investments in innovation, research and development totaled R$34 million during 2019, R$17 million during 2018 and R$16 million during 2017.

Joint Venture, Associated Companies and AssetsHeld-For-Sale

Joint Venture

We own 19.04% of the share capital of Hispamar, aSpanish-Brazilian enterprise created in November 1999 by Hispasat (the leading satellite telecommunications provider in the Iberian Peninsula), and our company. Hispamar operates the Amazonas 2 and Amazonas 3 satellites. In December 2002, we entered into an agreement with Hispasat that granted and transferred to Hispamar the rights to exploit geostationary orbital position 61 degrees west, and we acquired a minority equity stake in Hispamar.

In 2009, the Amazonas 2 satellite was launched and this satellite commenced commercial operations in early 2010. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders andon-board switching, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 2 satellite is owned by a subsidiary of Hispasat and Hispamar has been granted the right to operate and lease all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

In 2013, the Amazonas 3 satellite was launched and commenced commercial operations. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 3 satellite is owned by Hispamar, which operates and leases all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

Associated Company

We own 50% of Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., or AIX. AIX provides infrastructure services to our company and is engaged in the construction of ductwork for the installation of fiber optic cables along highways in the State of São Paulo.

AssetsHeld-for-Sale

Our board of directors has authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel and TPT—Telecomunicações Públicas de Timor, S.A., or TPT. As a per-minute basis from (1) local fixed-line, long-distanceresult, we record the assets and liabilities of Africatel and TPT asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel or TPT as discontinued operations in our income statement due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel and TPT on our results of operations.

Africatel

Africatel was formed in May 2006 and indirectly holds our equity interests in CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A.R.L., or CST, and Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda., or Directel. We own 86% of the share capital of Africatel.

CST

Africatel indirectly owns 51% of the share capital of CST, a provider of fixed and mobile services in São Tomé and Principe, that was established in 1989 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a20-year license granted in 2007.

Directel

Africatel indirectly owns 100% of the share capital of Directel, a Portuguese entity with subsidiaries in Angola, Cabo Verde, Mozambique, and Kenya, which publish telephone directories and operate related data bases in those countries.

TPT

We own 76.14% of the share capital of TPT, a Portuguese holding company that owns 54.01% of the share capital of Timor Telecom, S.A., or Timor Telecom, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste in Asia. Our wholly-owned subsidiary PT Participações also holds 3.05% of the share capital of Timor Telecom.

Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

Overview

Our business, including the nature of the services we provide and the rates we charge, is subject to comprehensive regulation under the General Telecommunications Law, and a comprehensive regulatory framework for the provision of telecommunications services promulgated by ANATEL. We provide fixed-line, domestic and international long-distance, mobile telecommunications, data transmission andPay-TV services under concessions, authorizations and licenses that were granted by ANATEL and allow us to provide specified services in designated geographic areas, as well as set forth certain obligations with which we must comply.

ANATEL is an administratively independent and financially autonomous regulatory agency that was established in July 1997 pursuant to the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL Regulation (Regulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). ANATEL oversees our activities and enforces the General Telecommunications Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. ANATEL is required to report on its activities to the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações), and has authority to propose and to issue regulations that are legally binding on telecommunications service providers. ANATEL also has the authority to grant concessions and licenses for all telecommunications services, other than broadcasting services. In addition, ANATEL is authorized to direct and control the provision of services, the shareholding structure of service providers, to complete calls terminating on our mobile networks,apply penalties and (2) long-distanceto declare the expiration of the concession and authorizations and the return of assets from the concessionaire to the government authority upon termination of the concession. Any regulation or action proposed by ANATEL is subject to a period of public comment, which may include public hearings, and ANATEL’s decisions may be challenged administratively before the agency itself or through the Brazilian judicial system.

The current regulatory framework for the Brazilian telecommunications industry was adopted in 1998. Under the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL regulations, the right to provide telecommunications services is granted either through a concession under the public regime (as discussed below) or an authorization under the private regime (as discussed below). A concession is granted for a fixed period of time following a public auction and is generally renewable. An authorization is granted for an indeterminate period of time and public auctions are held for some authorizations. These concessions and authorizations allow service providers forto provide specific services in designated geographic areas, set forth certain obligations with which the transfer to their networksservice providers must comply and require equal treatment of calls originating on our mobile networks.customers by the service providers.

The termsthree principal providers of fixed-line telecommunications services in Brazil, Telefônica Brasil, Claro and conditions of interconnection to our mobile networks, includingcompany, provide these services under the rates charged to terminate calls on these mobile networks,public regime. In addition, CTBC and Sercomtel, which are designated by ANATEL as VU-M rates, commercial conditions and technical issues, may be freely negotiated between us and other mobile andsecondary local fixed-line telecommunications service providers, operate under the public regime. All of the other providers of fixed-line telecommunications services and all providers of personal mobile services and data transmission services in Brazil operate under the private regime.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to compliancea public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. For more information, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Public Regime

Overview

Providers of public regime services are subject to more obligations and restrictions than providers of private regime services. Under Brazilian law, providers of public regime services are subject to certain requirements with regulations establishedrespect to services such as network expansion and network modernization. Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the PGMU, which was most recently updated in December 2018. For more information about the PGMU and our obligations thereunder, see “—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

In addition, public regime service providers, as well as private regime service providers, are required to comply with the provisions of: (1) the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL relating to traffic capacityin June 2013 and interconnection infrastructure that must be made available to requesting providers, among other things. We must offerwas partially superseded by the same VU-M rates to all requesting service providers on a nondiscriminatory basis. We apply VU-M charges on a per-minute basis.

Under ANATEL regulations,RQUAL in December 2013 ANATEL established the maximum VU-M rate of R$0.33 per minute that is applicable in the event that providers could not agree upon the VU-M applicable in their interconnection agreements. Under2019; and (2) the General Plan on Competition Targets (Plano Geral de Metas de CompetiçCompetição), in February 2014 the VU-M rateor PGMC, which was reduced to 75% of the maximum VU-M rate establishedadopted by ANATEL in November 2012 and updated in July 2018. For more information about the RGQ, the RQUAL and the PGMC see “ —Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ),” “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)” and “ —Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

The rates that public regime service providers may charge customers are subject to ANATEL supervision. Another distinctive feature of public concessions is the right of the concessionaire to maintain certain economic and financial standards, which are calculated based on the rules set forth in the concession agreements and were designed based on a price cap model. For more information, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Rate Regulation.”

Concessions are granted for 20 years.Whereas prior to the passage of Law No. 13,897, only one20-year renewal period was allowed, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of certain events described below under “—Termination of a Concession.” The modification right permits ANATEL to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. ANATEL is obligated to engage in public consultation in connection with each of these potential modifications.

General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU)

The PGMU sets forth the principal network expansion and modernization obligations of the public regime providers. The PGMU was approved by Decree No. 9,619 and became effective on December 2013,21, 2018, the date when it was published in the Official Gazette.

Public regime providers are subject to network expansion requirements under the PGMU, which are revised by ANATEL from time to time. No subsidies or other supplemental financings are anticipated to finance our network expansion obligations. Our failure to meet the network expansion and modernization obligations established by the PGMU or in our concession agreements may result in fines and penalties of up to R$50 million for eachnon-compliance with an obligation or rule as verified in an administrative process, as well as potential revocation of our concessions.

The PGMU requires the following, among other things:

local fixed-line service providers to provide individual access to fixed-line voice services to economically disadvantaged segments of the Brazilian population within their service areas, through programs to be established and regulated by ANATEL;

local fixed-line service providers to install public telephones on demand in locations with more than 100 inhabitants;

local fixed-line service providers to install fixed lines in locations with more than 300 inhabitants (1) in regions where there is no fixed line installed, within 120 days of a request and (2) in regions where fixed lines are already installed, within 7 days of a request for 90% of requests and in up to 25 days of a request for the remaining 10% of requests; and

local fixed-line service providers to gradually provide voice access in the wireless local loop technology with capacity for 4G services in 1,400 locations (of which 1,155 apply to Oi), according to the following schedule: 10% of such locations by December 31, 2019; 25% by December 31, 2020; 45% by December 31, 2021; 70% by December 31, 2022; and 100% by December 31, 2023.

Similarly to the 2008 amendments to the PGMU that eliminated the requirements to provide public telephone centers (postos de serviço telefônico) in exchange for building backhaul, the 2018 PGMU eliminated the requirements to provide multifacility service centers (postos de serviço multifacilidade), which are public centers located in rural areas that offer various telecommunications services, including voice, access to the internet and digital transmission of text and images, and to install and maintain public telephones within a fixed-line service concession, in exchange for other obligations to be defined.

The value of the obligations currently imposed by the PGMU and, therefore, the cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, is subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation.

Termination of a Concession

ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of any of the following:

an extraordinary situation jeopardizing the public interest, in which case the Brazilian government is authorized to start rendering the services set forth under the concession in lieu of the concessionaire, subject to congressional authorization and payment of adequate indemnification to the owner of the terminated concession;

termination by the provider (through an agreement with ANATEL or pursuant to legal proceedings) as a consequence of an act or omission of the Brazilian government that makes the rendering of the services excessively burdensome to the provider;

annulment of the concession due to a contractual term, which is deemed by subsequent law to be illegal;

material failure to comply with the provider’s universalization targets;

failure to meet insurance requirements set forth in the concession agreement;

asplit-up,spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the provider’s control without ANATEL’s authorization;

the transfer of the concession without ANATEL’s authorization;

the dissolution or bankruptcy of the provider; or

an extraordinary situation in which Brazilian government intervention, although legally permissible, is not undertaken, as such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in an unfair benefit to the provider.

In the event a concession is terminated, ANATEL is authorized to administer the provider’s properties and its employees in order to continue rendering services.

Service Restrictions

Public regime service providers are subject to certain restrictions on alliances, joint ventures and mergers and acquisitions with other public regime providers, including:

a prohibition on members of the same economic group holding more than two licenses for the provision of telecommunications services in the public regime, which would include holding more than 20% of the voting shares of or controlling (as such term is defined under ANATEL’s regulations) more than two providers of public regime telecommunications services; and

a restriction, as set forth in the General Grant Plan (Plano General de Outorgas), or PGO, on mergers between providers of public regime telecommunications services.

In September 2011, Law No. 12,485 became effective, which creates a new legal framework for subscription television services in Brazil, and determines, among other provisions to:

allow fixed-line telephone concessionaires, such as us, to enter the cable television market in Brazil;

remove existing restrictions on foreign capital investments in cable television providers;

limit the total and voting capital held by broadcast concessionaires and authorized providers, and in television programmers and producers, with headquarters in Brazil to 30%; and

prohibit telecommunications service providers with collective interests from acquiring rights to disseminate images of events of national interest and from hiring domestic artistic talent.

Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law. Law No. 13,879 will allow providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime, including the inability of providers to sell certain property, plant and equipment used to provide fixed-line telephone services. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. In February 20152020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the VU-Mrules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations, such as the methodology for calculating the cost of investments that providers will need to undertake as well as deadlines to complete the conversions. A draft of the new form of authorization agreement was also provided. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Private Regime

Providers of private regime services, although not generally subject to the requirements concerning continuity and universality of service and network modernization, are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their respective authorizations and applicable regulation.

For example, private regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the RGQ and the PGMC. For more information about the RGQ and the PGMC, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ)” and “—Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

Our Services

Fixed-Line Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

We provide the majority of our fixed-line telephone services (Serviço Telefônico Fixo Comutado—STFC) in accordance with concession agreements under the public regime. For more information about the regulations applicable to public regime telephone service providers, see “—Public Regime.”

Our Concessions and Authorizations

The following table sets forth certain details of our concessions and authorizations to provide local, domestic long-distance and international long-distanced fixed-line telephone services:

Geographic Scope

Type of Service

Termination Date

Regime

Region I of the PGO – States of Rio De Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraiba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, Maranhão, Pará, Amapá, Amazonas e Roraima, except Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region I of the PGO – Sector 3(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region II of the PGO – States of Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande Do Sul, except for Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region II of the PGO—Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region III of the PGO – São PauloLocal / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
NationalInternational Long DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization

(1)

Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO corresponds to 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais.

(2)

Concession agreements may be amended by the parties every five years prior to their termination date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Our concession agreements were last amended in 2011. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

(3)

Sectors 20, 22 and 25 of Region II of the PGO correspond to the following municipalities: Londrina, Paraná; Tamarana, Paraná; (Sector 22) Paranaíba, Mato Grosso do Sul (Sector 25); Buriti Alegre, Goiás; Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás; Inaciolândia, Goiás; Itumbiara, Goiás; Paranaiguara, Goiás; and São Simão, Goiás.

Each of our concession agreements:

sets forth the parameters that govern adjustments to our rates;

requires us to comply with the network expansion obligations set forth in the PGMU;

requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year;

In addition, each of our concession and authorization agreements:

sets forth the conditions under which ANATEL may access information from us;

requires us to comply with certain quality of service obligations as well as the quality of service obligations set forth in the RGQ;

requires us to pay fines for anynon-compliance with the regulatory rules including systemic service interruptions.

In addition, the PGMU requires us to provide transmission lines connecting our fiber-optic internet backbones to municipalities in our concession areas in which we did not provide internet service, which we refer to as backhaul. Under these concession agreements, we are obligated to set up backhaul in 3,188 municipalities in Regions I and II. The facilities that we constructed to meet these obligations are considered to be property that is part of our concessions and will therefore revert to the Brazilian government on January 1, 2026. For more information about the PGMU, see “—Public Regime—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law.”

In addition, in connection with the consideration of revisions to the concession agreements under the public regime, in January 2017, ANATEL proposed revisions to the terms of the PGO, in line with the provisions of PLC 79 (the bill that preceded Law No. 13, 789). However, despite the passage of Law No. 13,789, we cannot predict when and to what extent ANATEL will revise the PGO.

We cannot assure you that the implementation of Law No. 13,879 or any future amendments to our concession agreements (including renewals) or the PGO will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the migration of our concessions to the private regime or the amendments to our concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Rate Regulation

Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to offer basic local fixed-line plans to users. Rates for the basic long-distance services plan originated and terminated on fixed lines vary in accordance with certain criteria. The concession agreements establish aprice-cap mechanism for annual rate was reducedadjustments for basic service plans and basic domestic long-distance plans based on formulas set forth in each provider’s concession agreement. The formula provides for two adjustments to the price cap based on the local rate basket, the long-distance rate basket and the use of a price index. The price cap is first revised upward to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by an index, then ANATEL applies a productivity discount factor, or Factor X, which reduces the impact of the rate readjustment provided by the index.

Factor X is equal to (1) 50% of the maximum VU-Mincrease in the productivity rate establishedof public regime providers, plus (2) 75% of a factor calculated by ANATEL in December 2013. In July 2014, ANATEL approved a rulethat is designed to reflect cost optimization targets for the definitiontelecommunications industry as a whole. If the weighted average productivity rate is negative, ANATEL will not allow an annual adjustment in excess of maximum VU-M referencethe IST.

A provider may increase rates for entities with significant market power, suchindividual services within the local rate basket or the long-distance rate basket by up to 5% more than the IST so long as our company, based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Under this rule, VU-M reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2019 when VU-M reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply.

Data Transmission Rates

Broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are deemed to be value-added services under ANATEL regulations and, therefore, the rates and prices for theseother services in that rate basket are reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that the weighted average increase for the entire rate basket does not subjectexceed the permitted annual rate adjustment.

A provider may also offer alternative plans in addition to regulation and are market-driven. We offer broadband services subscriptions at prices that vary depending on the download speeds availablebasic service plan. Alternative plans must be submitted for ANATEL’s approval. The rates offered under the purchased subscription.

A significant portion of our revenues from commercial data transmission services are generated by monthly charges for EILD and SLD services, which are based on contractual arrangements for the use of part of our networks. Under ANATEL regulations, because we are deemed to have significant market power in the fixed-line

services business, we are required to make publicly available the forms of agreements that we use for EILD and SLD services, including the applicable rates, and are only permitted to offer these services under these forms of agreements. ANATEL publishes reference rates for these services and if one of our customers objects to the rates that we charge for these services, that customer is entitled to seek to reduce the applicable rate through arbitration before ANATEL.

In May 2014, ANATEL approved a standard for setting maximum values for EILD services based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. In July 2014, ANATEL published reference rates for EILD services that contain a single reference table which willalternative plans may be valid from 2016 until 2020. Under ANATEL regulations, EILD reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2020 when EILD reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply. In addition, under the General Plan of Competition Targets, companies with significant market, such as our company, are required to present a public offer every six months including standard commercial conditions, which is subject to approval by ANATEL.

Our revenue from IP services isadjusted annually based on the number of data ports to which the customer is granted access. Our revenue from frame relay services consists mainly of charges for access to the data transmission network and metered service charges based on the amount of data transmitted. Such services are offered as pay-per-use or volume-based packages. Our revenue from cyber data center services is generally based on contractual arrangements that are tailored to the specific services provided.IST.

DTH and IP TV Services Rates

DTH and IP TV services are deemed to be conditional access services under the private regime, which Oi provides pursuant to authorizations. As a result, the rates and prices for these services are not subject to regulation and are market-driven. We offer DTH and IP TV subscriptions at prices that vary depending on the content of the subscription package. We offer basic subscription packages for ourOi TV services, as well as a variety of premium packages which allow subscribers to tailor the content that they receive to their individual tastes.

Marketing and Distribution

During 2015, we incurred R$406 million in marketing expenses in our Brazilian operations. On a company-wide basis, weWe focus our marketing efforts on the upselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Oi” brand reinforcing the imagethrough our convergent services offerings and promotion of the convergence of the integrated company.ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our ResidentialB2B Services our Personal Mobility Services and our SME and Corporate Services.business.

We advertise through a diverse array of media outlets as partstrive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we adjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the goal of improving traffic to our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we used traditional advertising mediums, such as cable and network television and radio to increase our presence and the reach of our branding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to reach all types and classes of customers and potential customers. We use television, radio, billboards, exterior signage, telemarketing, direct mail and internet advertising to market our fixed-line, mobile, long-distance, broadband and subscription television services. We use our branded assets in advertising campaigns, such as the “Orelhão Mágico” Christmas campaign, in which children are able to place calls to Santa Claus from our telephone booths. We sponsor sporting events and individual athletes, as well as cultural events, such as fashion shows and popular music concerts. The goalgrow sales of our marketing initiatives isFTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media tools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of events, athletes and influencers to increase brand awareness ofand demonstrate our company as a convergent provider capable of meeting all of the telecommunications needs of our customers and expand the use of our distribution channels to increase net operating revenue.credibility.

Our principal marketing expenditures to support our Residential Services were designed to:

promote our bundled plans, such asOi Total andOi Conta Total as part of our effort to expand our customer base;

promote cross-selling of our services, including by promoting our bundled plans and higher value offers, as part of our effort to increase the profitability and enhance the loyalty of the existing customer base

expand our Oi fixed-line andOi TV customer bases with offers through our other services.

Our principal marketing expenditures to support our Personal Mobility Services were designed to:

promote our pre-paid mobile services via ad campaigns on television and digital media with a focus on our weekly packages and the launch of 4G technology on pre-paid plans;

promote our post-paid mobile plans, primarilyOi Mais andOi Mais Controle, as well as 4G data services at higher speeds, through specific marketing campaigns and mobile device subsidies (through ourOi Pontos program, which provides existing post-paid customers with a phone credit based on amount spent in the preceding 12-month period, to be applied as a credit against the price of a new mobile device), as part of our effort to increase our market share in mobile services; and

expand our 4G internet customer base, focusing on geographic regions covered by the National Broadband Plan.

In 2015, our SME and Corporate Services business did not engage in any marketing initiatives for its products and services. Instead, our ongoing marketing efforts in our SME and Corporate Services business include:

press releases for launches of new products and services;

client events, including attendance at fairs and conferences; and

other day-to-day marketing.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services market: (1) residential customers, including customers of our mobile services to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our distribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, including voice, broadband services andOi TV, and post-paid mobile services. As part of the restructuring of our distribution channels, we have begun to provide more extensive training to our employees and the employees of third-party sales agents and have revised our commission structures to incentivize selective sales of bundled and higher-value plans and services that generate higher ARPU and reduce customer churn rates. As of December 31, 2015,2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

 

  

our own network of stores, which included 197125Oi” branded stores.stores;

 

  approximately 300

508Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil.Brazil;

 

approximately 270

6,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us.us;

 

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of approximately 1,6501,400 sales representatives that answer more than 1.2 million314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to pro-activelyproactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media.media;

 

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of approximately 300679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers.telemarketers;

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of approximately 1,9002,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are not reachable by telemarketing.telemarketing; and

 

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As part of the restructuring of our distribution channels, our distribution channels for our post-paid personal mobility services have converged with our distribution channels for residential services. As of December 31, 2015,2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid personal mobility services Personal Mobility Services were:

 

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

approximately 10,000

524 stores that are part of large national chains whichthat sell our post-paid andpre-paid Personal Mobility Services and SIM cards and pre-paid mobile cards;

 

approximately 23 multibrandnine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 179,000280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets; and

 

our telemarketing sales channel has 1,832 sales representatives that answer more than 659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

SME and CorporateB2B Services

We have established separate distribution channels to serve smallSME and medium-sized enterprise, or SMEs, and large enterprises, or corporate customers. We market a variety of services to SMEs, including our core fixed-line, broadband and mobile services, as well as our value-added services, advanced voice services and commercial data transmission services. We have five regional offices from which approximately 100 employees supervise our marketing efforts to SMEs and our third-party sales force serving this sector. We also have begun to provide more extensive training to our employees and the employees of third-party sales agents. As of December 31, 2015,2019, the principal distribution channels that we use to market our services to SMEs were:

 

  approximately 100

Oi” exclusive agents with approximately 800 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers.customers;

 

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of threetwo agents that use approximately 350 sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes approximately 300 customer retention representatives.representatives; and

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers through our own direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to discuss the business needs of these enterprises and design solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service model focuses on post-sale service and we regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of December 31, 2015,2019, our corporate sales team, includingexcluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 1,250326 employees operating in six10 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line and domestic long-distance plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our rates, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

Billing and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several

banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the relevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus a one-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer when15 days after we send the customer’s account is more than 31 dayscustomer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer when30 days after the customer’s accountrestriction on outgoing calls is more than 61 days past due,imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer whenafter 30 days after the customer’s accountrestriction on incoming calls is more than 91 days past due, provided in each case that 15-days’ prior notice has been given to that customer prior to the imposition of each restriction.imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to partially suspend services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer when the customer’s account is more than 15 days past due, restrict all incoming calls received and outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer when15 days after we send the customer’s accountcustomer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is more than 45 days past due,imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer whenafter 30 days after the customer’s accountrestriction on incoming calls is more than 90 days past due, provided in each case that 15-days’ prior notice has been given to that customer prior to the imposition of each restriction.imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer´scustomer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

NetworkCompetition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and Facilitiesservice convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We are a leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2019, we had a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape we face relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas application and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully-integratedfully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our signal aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or MSANs,Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) to our aggregation networks, orand transportation networks. The analog voice signals are rerouted to our aggregation networks through Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer, or DSLAM, equipment which split the voice signal from the digital signaldata signals, which isare transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology. We are engaged in a long-term programtechnology, allowing us to update our MSAN equipment to DSLAM equipment as demand for data services increases. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 90% of our fixed-line network had been updated to support ADSL2+ or VDSL2offer broadband and we provided ADSL or VDSL2 services in 4,476 municipalities.

ADSL technology allows high-speed transmission ofanalog voice and data signals on a single copper wire pair for access to the network. Since voice transmission through telephone lines uses only one of many available frequency bands, the remaining frequency bands are available for data transmission.pair. Our network supports ADSL2+next generation ADSL and VDSL2, or very-high-bitrate digital subscriber line,VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ is a data communications technology that allows data transmission at speeds of up to 2420 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream, which is much faster thanupstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission through conventional ADSL. ADSL2+ permits us to offer a wider rangeat speeds of services than ADSL, including IP TV. VDSL2 is a DSL technology providing faster data transmission, up to 10035 Mbps (downstreamdownstream and upstream), permitting us to support high bandwidth applications such as HDTV, VoIP3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and broadband internet access, over a single connection.we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiberFTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support VDSL2 service and facilitate our offering of ourOi TV service.FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 100200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

For As of December 31, 2019, our non-residential customers, we have a fully integratedFTTH network reached more than 4.6 million homes passed, and managed network providing access for networks based on internet protocol, or IP,approximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and Asynchronous Transfer Mode, or ATM, protocol over legacy copper wire through which are able to provide:

symmetric and transparent access to Frame Relay services at speeds from 64 kbps to 1.5 Mbps;

symmetrical access with PPP (Point to Point) foran additional one million homes connected by the Internet connection services at speeds from 64 kbps to 1.5 Mbps; and

symmetrical access with PPP (Point to Point) to provide connection services for virtual private networks, or VPNs, through Multiprotocol Label Switching, or MPLS, protocol at speeds from 64 kbps to 1.5 Mbps.

The following table sets forth selected information about our fixed-line networks asend of the dates and for the periods indicated.2020.

   As of and For Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Installed access lines (in millions)

   27.5     28.0     28.3  

Access lines in service (in millions)

   14.9     16.3     17.7  

Public telephones in service (in thousands)

   651.7     653.3     655.6  

Broadband access lines in service (in millions)

   5.9     6.1     6.1  

Mobile devices access our GSM, (Global System for Mobile Communications), or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 25001800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service or GPRS,(GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (Kbps)(kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 Kbps,kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use high speed packet access,High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 14.242.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 Multiple Input Multiple Output,and 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and carrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Voice and dataAlthough currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks.networks, we are initiating Voice over LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2015, our 2G mobile access networks, consisting of 13,777 active radio base stations, covered 3,386 municipalities, or 93% of the urban population of Brazil. We have GPRS coverage in 100% of the localities covered and EDGE coverage in all state capitals.

As of December 31, 2015, our 3G mobile access networks, consisting of 9,265 active radio base stations, covered 1,288 municipalities, or 79% of the urban population of Brazil. We have HSPA coverage in all state capitals.

As of December 31, 2015, our 4G access networks, consisting of 5,213 active radio base stations, covered 133 municipalities, or 51% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the neighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2015,2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of overmore than two million hotspots with broadband access compatible with overmore than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. Portions of our aggregation network use conventional copper trunk lines to connect our access network to our switches and transportation networks. We use ATM protocol to permit high speed transmission of these signals. Other portions of our aggregation network use fiber optic cable to connect our access network to our switches and transportation networks using Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocol. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand,past, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. We are currently deploying Metro Ethernet networks in additional cities to serve rising customer demand. Our Metro Ethernet networks are fully-integrated management systems and provide:

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for point-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

DWDM systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Historically, we have used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that requirerequired dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. Our ATM networks have a fully-integrated management system and provide:

frame relay data services (a data transmission service using fast protocols based on direct use of transmission lines) from 64 Kbps up to 2 Mbps;

ATM data services supporting access rates from 2 Mbps to 622 Mbps; and

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ platforms.

In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols thatwhich permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks.

We have begun tonow use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designeddesignated to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TP networks are fully integrated to management systems and provide:

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of anour optical fiber network that connectscovers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. ThisOur fiber network supports high capacity Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 40200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. OurIn the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an additional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. This year, we expect to further extend our OTN/DWDM network, is complemented by microwavewith 100 Gbps links, to reach smaller26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we began to expand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the cities of Goiânia and towns.

Most of the large urban areasBrasília. As demand increases, more expansions of our fixed-line service areas are also connected by200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to replace our fiber optic cable networks. Our transmission infrastructure connects our digital switches to four international gateway switches: two in Rio de Janeiro, one in Curitiba and one in Brasília.existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our network and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failures.failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet dedicatedinternet-dedicated services and VPN offerings.offerings through access routers, for customer aggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of services aggregation over a single box), allowing us to reduce capital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peering links and international links that we maintain abroad.

We have implemented an address control and name resolution system for our IP networks within the objective of optimizing resources and improving the availability of internet access services.United States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and III and all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and III.

IPTV Network

Satellite Network

We have deployed an expanded range of satellite-basedThrough our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. Asin 86 cities in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2015, our satellite network covered approximately 5,165 localities in 26 states and the Federal District and provided voice and data services.

In 2000, we began the implementation of the land-based segment2019. For subscribers of our respective satellite networks in order to extend transmission to remote areas in the states of Acre, Paraná, Rondônia, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Pará, Amazonas, Amapá and Roraima, as well as to other areas with limited access to telecommunications services due to geographical conditions, such as Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás and Tocantins. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Boa Vista, Macapá, Belém, Santarém, Marabá, Rio de Janeiro and Porto Velho. These satellite networks use digital technology and began operating in August 2000. The fiber optic and satellite backbones are interconnected in Brasília, Belém, Manaus, Rio de Janeiro and Porto Velho. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

Hispamar Satellite S.A., or Hispamar, a Spanish-Brazilian consortium created in November 1999 by Hispasat (the leading satellite telecommunications provider in the Iberian Peninsula), and our company operates the Amazonas 2 and Amazonas 3 satellites, which were manufactured by Astrium (EADS Space Company). In December 2002, we entered into an agreement with Hispasat that granted and transferred to Hispamar the rights to exploit geostationary orbital position 61 degrees west, and we acquired a minority equity stake in Hispamar.

In 2009, the Amazonas 2 satellite was launched and this satellite commenced commercial operations in early 2010. The Amazonas 2 satellite was manufactured by Astrium and launched into geostationary orbit of 61 degrees West. This satellite provides both C and KU band transponders and on-board switching, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 2 satellite is owned by a subsidiary of Hispasat and Hispamar has been granted the right to operate and lease all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

The Amazonas 3 satellite was launched and commenced commercial operations in early 2013. The Amazonas 3 satellite was manufactured by Space Systems/Loral and launched into geostationary orbit of 61 degrees West. This satellite provides both C and KU band transponders, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 3 satellite is owned by Hispamar, a subsidiary of Hispasat, which operates and leases the transponder’s entire space segment on this satellite.

We lease transponders from:

Hispamar with 754 MHz of capacity, in the C band, on the Amazonas 3 satellite and 540 MHz of capacity in the C band on the Amazonas 2 satellite to provide voice and data services through 653 remote switches covering 390 municipalities;

Hispamar with 98.3 Mhz of capacity, in the KU band, on the Amazonas 3 satellite and 576 Mhz of capacity in the KU band on the Amazonas 2 satellite to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,028 localities; and

Intelsat Satellite with 68 MHz of capacity, in the C band, on the IS-905 satellite to transport voice and data signals from Macapá to Rio de Janeiro and Boa Vista to Rio de Janeiro.

As part of our goal to maximize investments and allocate resources to certain strategic developments, in 2015 we focused on the expansion of our backbone infrastructure. We now service more areas through our fixed line infrastructure, which reduced the number of satellites needed to comply with our public service obligations. As a result, we terminated leases and operations for the following satellites:

Intelsat Satellite with 122 MHz of capacity, in the C band, on the IS-805 satellite and 648 MHz of capacity in the C band on the IS 10-02 satellite to transport voice and data signals from Manaus to Rio de Janeiro; and

SES New Skies with 108 MHz of capacity, in the KU band, on the SES-4 satellite to provide voice and data services throughout Brazil.

DTH NetworkOi TV

We historically provide our DTH services through a satellite uplink located in Lurin, Peru which receives, encodes and transmits the television signals to satellite transponders. We lease these facilities and license the related technology from a subsidiary of Telefónica. We lease transponders for the delivery of these television signals to our subscribers from Telefónica. We have leased 216 Mhz of capacity in the KU band on the Amazonas 3 satellite and 36 Mhz of capacity in the KU band on the Amazonas 2 satellite to provide DTH services.

In December 2013, we started providing DTH services, through our own head-end located in Rio de Janeiro, Alvorada - Barra da Tijuca, which receives, encodes and transmits television signals for satellite transponders. We lease transponders for the delivery of these television signals to our subscribers from SES New Skies. We have leased 1.5 GHz of capacity in the KU-band, on the SES-6 satellite to provide DTH services throughout Brazil.

Our customers lease satellite dishes and set-top boxes from us as part of their subscriptions to ourOi TV services.

IP TV Network

We offer IP TV services in the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte through ouror FTTH network. For customers who have the IP TV service,networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and computers).

Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was R$38,911 million. As of December 31, 2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 5.5%; (5) buildings represented 3.9%; (6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 2.6%; and (7) other fixed assets represented 2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 21 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and SDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Automatic Switching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through MSANs or DSLAMs to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to our aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2019:

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 12,622 active radio base stations covering 1,018 municipalities, or 75% of the urban population of Brazil;

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,350 active radio base stations covering 1,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 14,019 active radio base stations covering 3,497 municipalities, or 94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we modernized our core network, with a focus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less and we invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep up with the growing demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of network problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoption of the single-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using carrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and aligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not historically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us to offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply in our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

In December 2012, weWe have entered into anthree operating lease agreementagreements with Sumbeowners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our equipmentPersonal Mobility Services on 1,200an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae of Sumbe. The monthly payments under thisantennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreement reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variationagreements with owners of IPCA. This operating lease has a 15-year term and is automatically renewable for successive 12-month periods unless any party to the agreement provides 60-day prior written notice terminating such renewal.

In April 2013, we entered into an operating lease agreement with São Paulo Cinco Locação de Torres Ltda.fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our equipmentfixed-line services on 2,113an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers of São Paulo Cinco Locação de Torres Ltda. towers.

The monthly payments under thistwo of our operating lease agreement reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA. This operating lease has a 20-year term that commenced upon completion of the assignment of the right to leaseagreements for space and install equipment on the fixed-line communication towers, and is renewable for another 20 years.

In April 2013, we entered into an operating lease agreement with BR Towers SPE 3 S.A. to lease space to install our equipment on 2,113 fixed-line communications towers of with BR Towers SPE 3 S.A. The monthly payments under this operating lease agreement reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA. This operating lease has a 20-year term that commenced upon completion of the assignment of the right to lease space and install equipment on the fixed-line communication towers, and is renewable for another 20 years.

In July 2013, we entered into an operating lease agreement with SBA Torres Brasil Ltda. to lease space to install our equipment on 2,113 fixed-line communications towers of São Paulo Cinco Locação de Torres Ltda. The monthly payments under this operating lease agreement reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA. This operating lease has a 20-year term that commenced upon

completion of the assignment of the right to lease space and install equipment on the fixed-line communication towers, and is renewable for another 20 years.

In December 2013, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Caryopoceae to lease space to install our equipment on 2,007 communications towers and rooftop antennae of Caryopoceae. The monthly payments under this operating lease agreement reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. This operating lease has a 15-year term and is automatically renewable for successive 60-month periods unless any party to the agreement provides 60-day prior written notice terminating such renewal.

In June 2014, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Tupã Torres to lease space to install our equipment on 1,641 communications towers and rooftop antennae of Tupã Torres. The monthly payments, under thisthe remainder of the operating lease agreementagreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. This

The operating lease has a 15-year termagreements for space on communications towers and isrooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 2029 and are automatically renewable for successive 60-month periods unless any party to the agreement provides 60-day prior written notice terminating such renewal.one-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

2G and 3G Networks

In April 2014, we and TIM entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint construction, implementation and reciprocal assignment of elements of our respective 2G and 3G network infrastructure.

4G Network

We currentlyAs of the date of this annual report, we are party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the same physical network, each using its own frequency spectrum resources, thus reducing the deployment costs in proportion to each operator’s respective coverage requirements while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures, a key priority of the Transformation Plan.expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing ArrangementAgreement with TIM to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, approximately 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with VivoTelefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in five municipalities, which we expect to expand during 2016 and succeeding years.the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and VivoTelefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Vivo,Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covers 32covered 31 cities in 2015, 150171 cities in 2016 and 525427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

43 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Agreements for Network Equipment and Services

In 2018, we entered into agreements with strategic suppliers to acquire equipment and services to support the modernization of network technologies for the expansion of mobile telephone service coverage and fiber optic broadband capacity. These projects are designed to modernize and consolidate our mobile network technologies, permitting our gradual use of our 2G and 3G frequencies to provide 4.5G services in all municipalities currently served by our mobile network and prepare our network for the implementation of 5G technology and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions. Under this agreement, we expect to acquire equipment and services from Huawei over the next five years.

Network Maintenance

Our external plant and equipment maintenance, installation and network servicing are performed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., or Serede, as well as one third-party service providers.provider, Telemont. We employ our own team of technicians for the maintenance of our internal plant and equipment.equipment maintenance.

Insourced Network Maintenance

In January 2012,May 2013 and June 2013, we enteredinsourced our installation, operations, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our fixed-line telecommunications services, mobile telecommunications services, data transmission services (including broadband access services), satellite services, buildings, access ways and towers. These services had previously been provided by Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda. and Alcatel-Lucent Brasil S.A.

In June 2016, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of A.R.M. Engenharia and changed its corporate name to Rede Conecta – Serviços de Rede S.A. In November 2018, Rede Conecta merged into a services agreement with Telemont forSerede. Through Serede we perform installation, operation and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the State of Rio de Janeiro. .

Outsourced Network Maintenance

In October 2012,2017, we entered into a services agreementagreements with Telemont for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Rondônia and Goiás and the Federal District. The total estimated payments during the five-year terms of these contracts are expected to be R$6.6 billion. In October 2015, we acquired all of the operations of Telemont related to our installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the State of Rio de Janeiro.

In October 2012, we entered into a services agreement with A.R.M. Engenharia for installation, operation and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, Bahia, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará, Amapá, Paraná and Santa Catarina. The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in October 2022, are approximately R$6.3 billion during the five-year term of this contract. In April and May 2016, we acquired A.R.M. Engenharia’s operations in the States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and Paraná, and we are managing those operations. Also in May 2016, we entered into an agreement with the shareholders of A.R.M. Engenharia to acquire the totality of the shares issued by ARM Engenharia. The completion of the transaction is subject to customary conditions precedent, including the completion of financial and legal due diligence and approval by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense.

In May 2013 and June 2013, we internalized our installation, operations, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our fixed-line telecommunications services, mobile telecommunications services, data transmission services (including broadband access services), satellite services, buildings, access ways and towers. These services had previously been provided by Nokia Solutions and Alcatel-Lucent Brasil S.A.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Serede, we perform installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Effects of Competition on the Rates that We Realize and the Discounts We Record.”

Residential Services

We are the leading provider of residential services in Regions I and II of Brazil with 14.9 million fixed lines in service (including the number fixed lines provided to our SME and Corporate Services customers) as of December 31, 2015. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2015, we had a market share of 56.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I (including the number fixed lines provided to our SME and Corporate Services customers) and a market share of 52.9% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II (including the number fixed lines provided to our SME and Corporate Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-4.2 billion.

line services are (1) Embratel, which had a market share of 25.3% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I and a market share of 18.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II as of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL, and (2) GVT, which had a market share of 9.9% of the total fixed lines in service in Region I and a market share of 23.4% of the total fixed lines in service in Region II as of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services, encouraged by the prevalence of all-net packages and offers of aggressively-priced packages from some mobile telecommunications service providers. The decrease in interconnection rates has discouraged the construction of new fixed-line networks. In addition, the decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers. We and other companies have combatted this trend by offering subscriptions with unlimited calling privileges at the same or similar prices to mitigate the pricing pressure. Finally, our competitors have begun competing in the consumer market with bundles or services targeted to the needs of lower income customers.

Mobile

We expect to continue to face competition from mobile services providers, which represent the main source of competition in our Residential Services business. As of December 31, 2015, there were 129.3 million mobile subscribers (including our mobile customers) in Region I, an 8.9% decrease over December 31, 2014, and there were 64.0 million mobile subscribers (including our mobile customers) in Region II, a 9.6% decrease over December 31, 2014, based on information available from ANATEL. In addition, due to the proliferation of all-net service plans, particularly for mobile services, which offer unlimited long-distance calls and data combination plans, we believe that we may be vulnerable to traffic migration as customers with both fixed-line and mobile telephones use their mobile devices to make calls to other mobile subscribers.

Fixed Line

Embratel provides local fixed-line services to residential customers through the cable network owned by its subsidiary Net in the portions of Regions I and II where Net provides cable television service. As a result, Net is able to offer cable television, broadband and telephone services as a bundle at a very competitive price. We also expect competition from Embratel to increase in certain cities in our service areas where the volume of demand is attractive.

We also compete in the State of São Paulo with Telefônica Brasil, which is the incumbent fixed-line service provider in the State of São Paulo. Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities in Regions I and II, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services to low- and medium-size businesses. We expect competition from Telefônica Brasil to increase in certain cities in our service areas where the volume of demand is attractive.

Competition from long-distance fixed-line service providers has decreased as a result of recent reductions in interconnections tariffs. The proliferation of all-net plans by fixed-line and mobile services providers that include free minutes for calls to subscribers of any operator have and may continue to adversely impact our revenues from fixed-line long-distance calls if our fixed-line customers choose to migrate to mobile services for long-distance communications and/or cancel their fixed-line services. Moreover, new technologies that serve as alternatives to traditional long-distance telephone calls, such as VoIP and instant internet messaging, have captured part of Brazil’s long-distance traffic.

Broadband

Cable television providers that offer broadband services, particularly Net and Telefônica Brasil, represent our principal competition in the broadband market. Both Embratel and Telefônica Brasil offer broadband services at

higher speeds than our offerings, and they offer integrated packages, consisting of subscription television, broadband and voice telephone services to cable television subscribers who, in general, have more purchasing power than other consumers. Net and Telefônica Brasil offer strong competition for fixed broadband services in municipalities that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

In addition, we compete in our service areas with smaller companies that have been authorized by ANATEL to provide fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as national operators, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of 20-30% of broadband customers.

Pay-TV

In Brazil, the high quality programming of television broadcasters has resulted in aggregate ratings for these broadcasters of approximately 60% of viewers and has limited the perceived value of subscription television. As a result, the subscription television market in Brazil has a low penetration compared to developed countries and even to other South American countries such as Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Penetration rates by subscription television have grown from approximately 8% of Brazilian households in 2005 to approximately 32% in 2015. According to information available from ANATEL, the Brazilian subscription television market decreased by 2.1% to 19.1 million subscribers as of December 31, 2015 from 19.5 million subscribers as of December 31, 2014.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and América Móvil, which provides DTH service through Embratel under the “Claro TV” brand and provides subscription television services using coaxial cable through Net. We offer DTH subscription television services throughout the regions in which we provide Residential Services.

We deliverOi TV through our fiber optic network using an internet protocol, or IP TV, in the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, respectively.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil.

As of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes SME and Corporate Services subscribers), we had a market share of 18.6% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil, ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 28.4%, TIM with 25.7% and Claro with 25.6%. As of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL, the competitive landscape for mobile services was as follows: in Region I, we had a market share of 24.3% of the total number of mobile subscribers, ahead of Telefônica Brasil and behind TIM with 25.1% and Claro with 24.7%; in Region II, we had a market share of 14.4% of the total number of mobile subscribers, ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 32.0%, TIM with 26.8% and Claro with 26.7%; and in Region III, we had a market share of 12.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers, ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 33.1%, Claro with 26.1% and TIM with 25.7%.

Competition in Mobile Voice and Data Communications Services

Competitive efforts in the pre-paid and post-paid personal mobility services market generally take the form of traffic subsidies and aggressive discounts on data packages. We no longer offer handset subsidies (with the exception of theOi Pontos program, which provides credit to existing post-paid customers to be used on the purchase of a new mobile device), but we do compete on the basis of traffic subsidies, all-net plans that eliminate the community effect of traditional telecommunications services in Brazil and discounts on data packages. The aggressiveness of promotions is generally driven by the desire of the operator offering the promotion to increase market share; however, these promotions generally are for a short duration as the pricing terms offered are not sustainable over the long term.

Studies of telecommunications consumption habits in Brazil show that, given budget restrictions caused by the macroeconomic situation, users have shifted away from owning a SIM card from each of the operators (in response to traditional on-net plans that offer substantial discounts for calls to the same operator) and have begun to consolidate telecommunications services on a the SIM card that offers the best data package. This trend will result in a decline in the overall customer base for pre-paid services, which will require operators to offer increasingly comprehensive data packages at aggressive discounts in order to maintain and potentially increase their customer bases.

Our launches of theOi Mais,Oi Mais Controle andOi Livre portfolios have kept us on the forefront of competition in the mobile services market. We believe our innovative flat rate pricing, all-net model for voice services and text messaging, and robust data packages at competitive rates enable us to satisfy the growing customer demand for simpler product offerings and greater access to data.

In addition, we believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype. Since November 2011, we have deployed a network of Wi-Fi hotspots, which is composed of sub networks that are accessible from (1) indoor public and commercial sites, such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers, (2) outdoor public spaces and (3) residential access points of our fixed-line customers that share access points in association with Fon. As of December 31, 2015, our Wi-Fi network consisted of over two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with over two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide. Our data customers (both mobile and fixed) have unlimited access to our Wi-Fi hotspots, extending our mobile coverage and improving customer experience.

Competition in Mobile Data Only Services

Studies of telecommunications consumption habits in Brazil show that users are demanding more data for use in social networking sites and smartphone applications such as WhatsApp. This shift from voice to data consumption affects our Personal Mobility Services business in two ways: (1) it enables customers to use data to communicate with anyone anywhere in the world via internet instant messaging systems available on smartphone applications such as WhatsApp, and (2) it enables consumers to use data to call anyone anywhere in the world using the VoiP capabilities available in such smartphone applications.

Following a study of the telecommunications consumption habits in Brazil, in November 2015 we launched ourOi Livre portfolio, a set of innovative offerings with significant increase in data allowances and a flat fee for all-net calls (with the exception ofOi Livre Por Dia) to customers of any operator in Brazil. This initiative changes the mobile service market in Brazil and the manner in which our customers communicate, disrupting the original pre-paid model in which customers acquired SIM cards from different operators and used the respective SIM for on-net calls with that particular operator in an effort to avoid paying high rates for off-net calls.

In the post-paid mobile data communications market, our primary competitors are Telefônica Brasil, Claro and TIM. As of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL, which includes SME and Corporate Services subscribers, we had a market share of 11.9% of the total number of post-paid mobile data subscribers in Brazil (including hybrid data plan subscribers), ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 42.4%, Claro with 22.7% and TIM with 18.5%. We believe that our most direct competitor in this market is TIM, whose customer acquisition and retention strategy of offering traffic subsidies, all-net plans and aggressive discounts on data packages most closely resembles ours. On the other hand, Vivo and Claro, whose prices are typically higher than those of the other mobile data service providers in the market, primarily focus on the high-end consumer market.

In the pre-paid mobile data communications market, our primary competitors are also Telefônica Brasil, Claro and TIM. As of December 31, 2015, based on information available from ANATEL, which includes SME and Corporate Services subscribers, we had a market share of 21.3% of the total number of pre-paid mobile data subscribers in Brazil, ranking behind Telefônica Brasil with 22.9%, Claro with 26.7% and TIM with 28.5%. As in the post-paid mobile data communications market, we believe that our most direct competitor in the pre-paid mobile data communications market is TIM, who offer plans similar toOi Livre.

Competition in Mobile Long-Distance Services

Recent reductions in the interconnections rates for Regions I, II and III have resulted in lower costs for long-distance services, both to us and to our customers. As a result, we and TIM have introduced “all-net” voice and messaging plans that allow customers to call anywhere in Brazil for a flat rate. Nearly all the plans in our recently launchedOi Mais,Oi Mais Controle andOi Livre portfolios offer all-net calling and text messaging services, which capitalized on the reductions in interconnection rates and simplified our portfolios, thereby eliminating the community effect. We believe that the introduction of all-net plans, coupled with more robust and data packages that allow consumers to use smartphones applications more freely, have substantially reduced competition in the mobile long-distance services market.

SME and Corporate Services

The competition risks relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our SME customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers. The competition risks relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our corporate customers are also similar.

In recent years, there has been a shift among SME and corporate services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas app and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors, and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Embratel, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

The Brazilian recession has had a significant negative effect on our operating revenue and margins as SMEs generally, including our customers, have reduced the size of their businesses and in some cases ceased operations. In addition, a number of our Corporate customers have reduced their telecommunications spending as part of their overall cost-cutting efforts.

Concessions, Authorizations and Licenses

Under the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL regulations, the right to provide telecommunications services is granted either through a concession under the public regime or an authorization under the private regime. For additional details regarding the rights and obligations of service providers operating under the public regime and the private regime, see “—Telecommunication Regulations—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry— Concessions and Authorizations.” We operate under:

a concession to provide local fixed-line services in Region I (other than the 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais that are excluded from the concession area of Region I) and a concession to provide local fixed-line services in Region II (other than the nine municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná that are excluded from the concession area of Region II);

a concession to provide domestic long-distance services in Region I (other than the 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais that are excluded from the concession area of Region I) and a concession to provide domestic long-distance services in Region II (other than the nine municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná that are excluded from the concession area of Region II);

authorizations to provide personal mobile services in Regions I, II and III;

authorizations to provide local fixed-line services and domestic long-distance services in (1) the 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais that are excluded from the concession area of Region I, (2) the nine municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná that are excluded from the concession area of Region II, and (3) Region III;

authorizations to provide international long-distance services originating anywhere in Brazil;

authorizations to provide Multimedia Communication Services (Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia) throughout Brazil; and

an authorization to provide subscription television services throughout Brazil.

These concessions and authorizations allow us to provide specific services in designated geographic areas and set forth certain obligations with which we must comply.

Fixed-Line and Domestic Long-Distance Services Concession Agreements

We have entered into concession agreements with ANATEL that govern our concessions to provide (1) fixed-line services in the Federal District and each of the states of Regions I and II and (2) domestic long-distance services originating from the Federal District and each of the states of Regions I and II. Each of our fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements:

expires on December 31, 2025;

sets forth the parameters that govern adjustments to our rates for fixed-line services;

requires us to comply with the network expansion obligations set forth in the General Plan on Universal Service Goals;

requires us to implement electronic billing systems;

sets forth the conditions under which ANATEL may access information from us; and

requires us to pay fines for systemic service interruptions.

In addition to the above, each of our concession agreements for fixed-line services requires us to comply with certain quality of service obligations set forth in these concession agreements as well as the quality of service obligations set forth in the General Plan on Quality Goals.

Each of our fixed line concessions requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of local fixed-line services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year, while allowing us to apply the amount of such fees to finance the expanded service obligations created by the amended General Plan on Universal Service Goals in lieu of making payment to ANATEL. Similarly, each of our domestic long-distance concessions requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of domestic long-distance services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year.

These concession agreements also required us to provide transmission lines connecting our fiber-optic internet backbones to municipalities in our concession areas in which we did not provide internet service, which we refer to as backhaul. Under these concession agreements, we were obligated to set up backhaul in 3,252 municipalities in Regions I and II. The facilities that we constructed to meet these obligations are considered to be property that is part of our concessions and will therefore revert to the Brazilian government on January 1, 2026.

These concession agreements provide that ANATEL may modify their terms in 2015 and 2020 and may revoke them prior to expiration under the circumstances described under “—Telecommunications Regulation—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Regulation of Fixed-Line Services—Termination of a Concession.” The modification right permits ANATEL to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. ANATEL is obligated to engage in public consultation in connection with each of these potential modifications.

On June 27, 2014, ANATEL opened a public comment period for the 2015 revision of the terms of our concession agreements. The comment period, which ended on December 26, 2014, was opened for comments on certain topics such as service universalization, rates and fees, among others. We submitted our comments during this period. Throughout 2015, ANATEL, the Brazilian Ministry of Communications and telecommunications service providers met regularly to discuss possible amendments to each of the concession agreements granted by ANATEL, including ours, and the implications of the developments and demands in the telecommunications sector in recent years. In September 2015, the Ministry of Communications created a working group, consisting of three members from each of ANATEL and the Ministry of Communications, to evaluate the status of the concessions and propose guidelines for the amendment of the concession agreements. In November 2015, the Ministry of Communications opened public consultation on the new regulatory framework for telecommunications. The Ministry of Communications has extended the deadline for contributions on multiple occasions. In April 2016, the Ministry of Communications, based on the working group’s findings, issued a decree addressing guidelines for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, which will be implemented by ANATEL through the conclusion of the concession amendments. The guidelines provide for, among other things, the expansion of broadband services (including in rural regions), the elimination of the reversibility of assets, and an extension of the term of our concessions, which are currently scheduled to expire in 2025. As a result of the publication of these guidelines, ANATEL requested a further postponement of the review of our concession agreements, which was granted. As a result of this extension, the review of our concession agreements is currently scheduled to occur by December 2016.

For more information regarding the regulation of our fixed-line services, the General Plan on Universal Service Goals and the General Plan on Quality Goals, see “—Telecommunications Regulation—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry— Regulation of Fixed-Line Services.”

2G Radio Frequency Licenses

We hold five licenses to use radio frequency spectrum to provide 2G services in Regions I and II and four in Region III. These licenses grant us permission to use the applicable radio spectrum for 15 years from the date of the authorization agreement under which they are granted and are renewable for additional 15-year terms. Upon renewal of any of these licenses and on every second anniversary of such renewal, we will be required to pay an amount equal to 2.0% of our prior year’s net operating revenue from personal mobile services. The initial terms of our radio frequency spectrum licenses expire between 2016 and 2022.

Our authorization agreements are subject to network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements. Under these obligations we are required to service all municipalities in Brazil with a population in excess of 100,000. A municipality is considered “serviced” when the covered service area contains at least 80% of the urban area in the municipality. Our failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in ANATEL regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in termination of our personal mobile services authorizations by ANATEL. As of the date of this annual report, we have satisfied the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements; however, we have not yet received ANATEL’s inspection report.

3G Radio Frequency Licenses

We hold five licenses to use radio frequency spectrum to provide 3G services in Regions I, II and III. Each of these licenses grants us permission to use the applicable radio spectrum for 15 years from the date of grant and is renewable for additional 15-year terms. We will be required to pay an amount equal to 2.0% of our prior year’s net operating revenue from personal mobile services upon renewal of the license and on every second anniversary of the renewal. The initial terms of these licenses expire in 2023.

These radio frequency licenses include network scope obligations. Under these obligations, we are currently required to (1) provide service to 459 municipalities that did not have mobile services at the time these licenses were granted with either 2G or 3G mobile telecommunications services, (2) provide 3G service to all state capitals in Brazil, the Federal District and all municipalities with a population in excess of 200,000 inhabitants, (3) provide 3G service to all of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population in excess of 100,000, and (4) provide 3G service to 50% of all of the municipalities with a population between 30,000 and 100,000. In addition, we will be

required to provide 3G service to 60% of the municipalities, including 641 specified municipalities, covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000 by 2016.

A municipality is considered “serviced” when the covered service area contains at least 80% of the urban area in the municipality. Our failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in ANATEL regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in termination of our 3G frequency licenses by ANATEL. As of the date of this annual report, we have satisfied the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these licenses; however, we have not yet received ANATEL’s inspection report.

4G Radio Frequency Licenses

We hold three licenses to use radio frequencies in 2.5 GHz sub-bands to provide 4G services in Regions I, II and III. Each of these licenses grants us permission to use the applicable radio spectrum for 15 years from the date of grant and is renewable for additional 15-year terms. We will be required to pay an amount equal to 2.0% of our prior year’s net operating revenue from 4G services upon renewal of the license and on every second anniversary of the renewal. The initial terms of these licenses expire in 2027.

These radio frequency licenses include network scope obligations. Under these obligations, we are currently required to provide:

4G service in all state capitals, municipalities with a population in excess of 200,000 and the Federal District;

voice services in the 450 MHz spectrum and data services at minimum upload speeds of 128 kbps and download speeds of 256 kbps and a minimum monthly allowance of 250 MB in 384 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District;

unlimited data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 128 kbps to rural schools in 384 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District; and

make our fixed-line network available to other telecommunications service providers to allow them to comply with their obligations under the General Plan on Universal Service Goals in 962 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District.

In addition, we will be required to:

provide 4G service to all of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population in excess of 100,000 by December 31, 2016;

provide 4G service to all of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population between 30,000 and 100,000 by December 31, 2017;

provide 4G service to 30% of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000 by December 31, 2017;

provide 4G service to 60% of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000 by December 31, 2018;

provide 4G service to all of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000 by December 31, 2019;

offer voice services in the 450 MHz spectrum and data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 1Mbps and a minimum monthly allowance of 500 MB in 962 in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District by December 31, 2017; and

provide unlimited data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 128 kbps to rural schools in 962 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District by December 31, 2017.

In addition, our 4G radio frequency licenses impose minimum investment obligations in domestic technologies. At least 65% of the cost of all goods, services, equipment, telecommunications systems and data networks that we purchase to meet our 4G service obligations must developed in Brazil. This minimum requirement will increase to 70% between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022.

Our failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in ANATEL regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in termination of our 4G frequency licenses by ANATEL. As of the date of this annual report, we have satisfied the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these licenses.

Fixed-Line Services Authorization Agreements

We have entered into authorization agreements with ANATEL that govern our authorizations to provide local fixed-line services in and domestic long-distance services originating from (1) the 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais that are excluded from the concession area of Region I, (2) the nine municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná that are excluded from the concession area of Region II, and (3) Region III. These authorizations do not have termination dates and require us to comply with certain quality of service obligations set forth in the General Plan on Quality Goals.

We have also entered into authorization agreements with ANATEL that govern our authorizations to provide international long-distance services originating from anywhere in Brazil. These authorizations do not have termination dates and require us to comply with quality of service obligations set forth in the General Plan on Quality Goals.

Multimedia Communication Services Authorization Agreements

We have Multimedia Communication Services authorizations, which superseded our prior Telecommunications Network Transportation Services (Serviço de Rede de Transporte de Telecomunicações) authorizations, permitting us to provide high speed data service.

The Multimedia Communication Services authorizations became effective in May 2003 and cover the same geographical areas as our concession agreements. In April 2008, in connection with the amendments to our fixed-line services concessions, we agreed to provide internet service free of charge until December 31, 2025 to all urban schools in the areas of our concession agreements.

Term of Commitment to Adhere to National Broadband Plan

On June 30, 2011, we entered into a Term of Commitment (Termo de Compromisso) with ANATEL and the Ministry of Communications to formalize our voluntary commitment to adhere to the terms of the National Broadband Plan, created in May 2010 by Executive Decree No. 7,175/10 with the goal to make broadband access available at low cost, regardless of technology, throughout Brazil. Pursuant to the Term of Commitment, we are required to offer (1) broadband services with minimum upload and download capabilities to retail customers in certain sectors of Region I and II for a maximum price of R$35 per month (or R$29.90 in ICMS-exempt states), plus fees, and (2) access to our broadband infrastructure to certain wholesale customers, including small businesses and municipalities, in certain sectors of Region I and II for a maximum price of R$1,253 per 2 Mbps per month and a one-time installation fee, while observing all quality standards under ANATEL regulations. Both retail and wholesale services are subject to certain network capacity limits and need only be provided at the demand of the customer. Pursuant to the Term of Commitment, we have offered the required services to all eligible retail and wholesale customers since the date of its execution and have gradually increased the capacities offered to wholesale customers since November 2011. We have been obligated to provide the maximum capacities established by the Term of Commitment to eligible wholesale customers since June 30, 2015. In addition, the Term of Commitment requires that we:

provide one public internet access point for the first 20,000 inhabitants and one additional access point for each subsequent 10,000 inhabitants, with a limit of six access points, at a speed of 2 Mbps, in each municipality that has only satellite service, free of charge and upon demand of such municipality;

adequately advertise the services contemplated by the Term of Commitment and present to the Ministry of Communications semi-annual reports detailing our marketing efforts; and

make our best efforts to offer broadband services to retail customers at speeds of up to 5 Mbps, reaching the largest possible number of municipalities.

The Term of Commitment will expire on December 31, 2016.

Subscription Television Authorization Agreement

In November 2008, we entered into an authorization agreement with ANATEL that governs our use of satellite technology to provide DTH satellite television services throughout Brazil. The authorization agreement permits us to provide DTH satellite television services for 15 years and is renewable for an additional 15-year term in exchange for a fee to be agreed upon between us and ANATEL.

Under this authorization, we are required to furnish equipment to certain public institutions, to make channels available for broadcasting by specified public institutions, and to comply with quality of service obligations set forth in applicable ANATEL regulations.

In December 2012, ANATEL granted our request to convert our DTH authorization agreement into a Conditional Access Service authorization allowing us to provide nationwide subscription television services through any technology, including satellite, wireline and coaxial cable. The Conditional Access Service authorization agreement authorized us to offer the services to be governed by such agreement, including IP TV. In accordance with the ANATEL resolution that approved the Conditional Access Service regime, our Conditional Access Service authorization prohibits us from creating television content or owning more than 30% of a company that creates content. We are also required to carry a certain percentage of Brazilian programming, including open channels and public access channels.

Research and Development

We conduct independent innovation, research and development in areas of telecommunications services but historically we have not independently developed new telecommunications technologies. We depend primarily on suppliers of telecommunications equipment for the development of new technology.

As a condition to ANATEL’s approval of Telemar’s acquisition of control of our company in January 2009, Telemar agreed to make annual investments in innovation, research and development through 2018 in amounts equal to at least 50% of the amounts of its contributions to the Fund for the Technological Development of Telecommunications (Fundo para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico das Telecomunicações), or FUNTTEL. To fulfill this obligation, as well as to centralize our innovation, research and development activities and programs, in 2009, we created a division to manage innovation, research and development with the mission of coordinating and promoting efforts and projects that it develops.

Our technology laboratory performs a variety of functions, such as operation support systems, business support systems and information security. We conduct trials of technologies from different vendors in this laboratory to evaluate these technologies for deployment.

Since 2009, we have executed cooperation agreements with the following national research centers: Technological Projects, Research and Studies Coordination Foundation (Fundação Coordenação de Projetos, Pesquisas e Estudos Tecnológicos – COPPETEC), Telecommunications Research and Development Foundation (Fundação Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Telecomunicações - CPqD),

and PUC-RJ. We have also executed cooperation agreements with Brazilian national telecommunications suppliers which develop technology in Brazil, such as Nokia AsGa S.A., Digitel S.A. – Indústria Eletrônica and Padtec S.A. Since 2009, we have signed more than 10 such cooperation agreements.

In order to achieve our goals on innovation investments, in 2015, we intensified the process for the exploration of innovative services and activities concerning innovation, research and development to promote our innovation ecosystem.

Our investments in innovation, research and development totaled R$2034 million in 2015,during 2019, R$17 million during 2018 and R$16 million during 2017.

Joint Venture, Associated Companies and AssetsHeld-For-Sale

Joint Venture

We own 19.04% of the share capital of Hispamar, aSpanish-Brazilian enterprise created in 2014November 1999 by Hispasat (the leading satellite telecommunications provider in the Iberian Peninsula), and R$13 millionour company. Hispamar operates the Amazonas 2 and Amazonas 3 satellites. In December 2002, we entered into an agreement with Hispasat that granted and transferred to Hispamar the rights to exploit geostationary orbital position 61 degrees west, and we acquired a minority equity stake in 2013.Hispamar.

Property, PlantIn 2009, the Amazonas 2 satellite was launched and Equipmentthis satellite commenced commercial operations in Brazilearly 2010. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders andon-board switching, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 2 satellite is owned by a subsidiary of Hispasat and Hispamar has been granted the right to operate and lease all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

In 2013, the Amazonas 3 satellite was launched and commenced commercial operations. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 3 satellite is owned by Hispamar, which operates and leases all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

Associated Company

We own 50% of Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., or AIX. AIX provides infrastructure services to our company and is engaged in the construction of ductwork for the installation of fiber optic cables along highways in the State of São Paulo.

AssetsHeld-for-Sale

Our principal Brazilian properties, ownedboard of directors has authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel and leased, are located in Regions I and II.TPT—Telecomunicações Públicas de Timor, S.A., or TPT. As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment in Brazil was R$25,817 million. Our main equipment in Brazil consists of transmission equipment, trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups.

As of December 31, 2015, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment in Brazil, transmission and other equipment represented 52.2%; infrastructure, primarily underground ducts, post and towers, cables and lines represented 22.7%; automatic switching equipment represented 7.8%; buildings represented 7.2%; work in progress represented 6.4%; and other fixed assets represented 3.8%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.

Intellectual Property

We believe the trademarks that identify us and our Brazilian businesses are important for us, and as a result, we have taken stepsrecord the assets and liabilities of Africatel and TPT asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel or TPT as discontinued operations in our income statement due to protect them before the Brazilian Patentimmateriality of the effects of Africatel and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. As of December 31, 2015, we had 1,126 trademarks registered by the BPTO and 684 pending trademark applications. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered by the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services. Among the various registered trademarks 36 are being contested by third parties. In addition, 173 of our pending trademark applications have been challenged by third parties.

As of December 31, 2015, we had 1,239 domain names registered by the Center of Information and Coordination of Dot Br –NIC. Br, the agency responsible for registering domain names in Brazil. The information includedTPT on our websites or that might be accessed throughresults of operations.

Africatel

Africatel was formed in May 2006 and indirectly holds our websites is not included in this annual report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.

As of December 31, 2015, the BPTO had granted 12 patents, utility models or industrial designs in the name of our company. We had also filed 18 patent applications, which are currently being examined by the BPTO. Requests for technical examination have been submitted to the BPTO for all of these pending patent applications. Once the examination is concluded, BPTO will issue an official decision accepting or rejecting the application, which will be published in the Official Gazette. If granted, the patent will be enforced for 20 years beginning from filing date.

Insurance

Pursuant to requirements in our Brazilian concession agreements, we maintain the following insurance policies: (1) all risk property insurance covering all insurable assets pertaining to the concessions; (2) loss of profit insurance covering lost profits deriving from property damage and business interruption; and (3) performance bond insurance to assure compliance with our obligations related to quality of service and universal service targets set forth in our concession agreements.

In addition to the above policies, we maintain civil liability insurance in Brazil. Our assets that are of material value and/or exposed to high degrees of risks are also insured. All of our insurance coverage was purchased from highly rated insurance companies in Brazil.

We believe that our current insurance coverage is suitable to our Brazilian operations.

Social Responsibility

In 2001, we createdOi Futuro, a corporate social responsibility institute that has been designated a Public Interest Organization (Organização da Sociedade Civil de Interesse Público) by the Brazilian Ministry of Justice (Ministério da Justiça).Oi Futuro develops and supports cultural, sustainability and educational programs using information technology and communications to promote social inclusion and human development.

Oi Futuro operates two cultural centers and a telecommunications museum in Rio de Janeiro.Oi Futuro also manages the “Programa Oi de Patrocínios Culturais Incentivados,” which sponsored more than 100 projects through a public selection in 2015.

Oi Futuro supports and develops educational projects using new communication and information technologies to transform the classroom environment and prepare young people from low-income communities for future jobs.Oi Futuro’s diverse initiatives include (1) the Advanced Education Center (Núcleo Avançado em Educação), or NAVE, a public vocational high school established through a public-private partnership with campuses in Rio de Janeiro and Recife, and (2) the “Oi Kabum!” Arts and Technology School (Oi Kabum! Escola de Arte e Tecnologia) with campuses in Rio de Janeiro, Recife, Belo Horizonte and Salvador. In 2015, more than 4,000 students participated in both educational programs (NAVE and Oi Kabum!) and through partnership with other public schools.

Since 2009, NAVE has been consistently recognized by Microsoft as one of the most innovative schools in the world. The NAVE Rio was the only Brazilian school invited by Qatar Foundation to participate in the WISE (World Innovation Summit for Education) Book, one of the most relevant publications worldwide in the field of innovation and education in 2014. In 2015, NAVE was recognized by the Award Rio+Entrepreneur (Rio + Empreendedor) for its contribution to the economic and social development of the State of Rio de Janeiro.

Oi Futuro supports social-environmental programs through itsOi Novos Brasis program, which focuses on community development, environmental and biodiversity projects. In 2015, more than 8,800 people benefited from these programs. In addition, in 2015,Oi Futuro supported 20 projects through the Public Funds for Childhood and Adolescence (FIA - Fundos Públicos da Infância e da Adolescência) and sports projects.

We contributed R$24 million in each of 2015, 2014 and 2013 to these projects and programs.

Operations in Africa

In 2006, PT Ventures formed Africatel Holdings B.V., or Africatel, and subsequently (1) contributed to Africatel its equity interests in (a) Unitel, which operates in Angola, and (b) Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A., or CVTelecom, which operates in Cape Verde, among others, and (2) acquired (a) 34% of the equity interests in Mobile Telecommunications Limited, or MTC, which operates in Namibia, and (b) 51% of the equity interest in CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A.R.L., or CST, which operated in São Tomé and Príncipe. In 2007, PT Ventures sold 22% of the equity interests in Africatel to Samba Luxco, an affiliate of Helios Investors L.P., or Helios, a private equity firm operating in sub-Saharan Africa, and entered into a shareholders’ agreement with Samba Luxco regarding governance and liquidity rights relating to Africatel. In 2008, PT Ventures transferred

its equity interests in Africatel to Pharol, which sold an additional 3% of the equity interests in Africatel to Samba Luxco. In 2009, Pharol sold 100% of the equity interests in PT Ventures to Africatel.

As of December 31, 2015, in addition to its interests in Unitel, MTC, CVTelecom and CST, Africatel owns Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda., or Directel, which publishes telephone directories and operates related data bases in Angola, Cabo Verde, Mozambique, Uganda and Kenya.

As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal in May 2014 and PT Portugal’s transfer of all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações, which holds our direct and indirect interests in Africatel and TPT, to Oi in connection with our sale of PT Portugal, weDirectel. We own 75% of the equity interests in Africatel. Pharol, our subsidiaries PT Ventures and Africatel GmbH & Co KG, of Africatel GmbH, and Samba Luxco are parties to a shareholders’ agreement under which we have ownership and management control of Africatel, which we refer to as the Africatel shareholders’ agreement.

On September 16, 2014, our subsidiary, Africatel GmbH, which directly holds our interest in Africatel, received a letter from Samba Luxco in which Samba Luxco claimed that Oi’s acquisition of PT Portugal was deemed a change of control of Pharol under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement, and that this change of control entitled Samba Luxco to exercise a put right under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement at the fair market equity value of Samba Luxco’s Africatel shares. In the letter, Samba Luxco purported to exercise the alleged put right and thereby require Africatel GmbH to acquire its shares in Africatel.

On September 26, 2014, Africatel GmbH responded to Samba Luxco stating that there had not been any action or event that would trigger the right to exercise the put option under the Africatel’s shareholders’ agreement and that Africatel GmbH intended to challenge Samba Luxco’s purported exercise of the put option. On the same date, we issued a Material Fact disclosing Samba Luxco’s purported exercise of the put option, our understanding that the exercise of the put option is not applicable, and that our board of directors had authorized our management to take the necessary actions to sell our interest in Africatel.

On November 12, 2014, the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce notified Africatel GmbH that Samba Luxco had commenced arbitral proceedings against Africatel GmbH to enforce its purported put right or, in the alternative, certain other rights and claims allegedly arising out of Oi’s acquisition of PT Portugal. Africatel GmbH presented its answer to Samba Luxco’s request for arbitration on December 15, 2014. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on March 12, 2015 and the proceedings are ongoing. Africatel GmbH intends to continue to vigorously defend these proceedings.

Unitel, Angola

In 2000, PT Ventures, then a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol, acquired 25%86% of the share capital of Unitel, a 2G mobile operator in Angola. Unitel began operations in Luanda in 2001. In connection with this investment, PT Ventures entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the other shareholders of Unitel regarding governance and liquidity rights relating to Unitel, and dispute resolution provisions. In 2007, Pharol contributed its shares of PT Ventures to Africatel. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal in May 2014 and PT Portugal’s transfer of all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações to Oi in connection with our sale of PT Portugal, we have an 18.75% economic interest in Unitel. We account for this investment as an asset held-for-sale.

MTC, Namibia

In 2006, Pharol entered into an agreement to acquire 34% of the capital of MTC, a Namibian mobile operator, from Namibia Post and Telecom Holdings, a state-controlled entity, or NPTH. In connection with this transaction, Pharol entered into a shareholders’ agreement with NPTH regarding governance and liquidity rights relating to MTC that allowed Pharol to set and control the financial and operating policies of MTC. In 2006, Pharol assigned its rights to acquire the capital of MTC and its rights under the shareholders’ agreement to Africatel. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal in May 2014 and PT Portugal’s transfer of all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações to Oi in connection with our sale of PT Portugal, we fully consolidate MTC in our consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2015, MTC had 2.4 million customers, of which 93.7% were customers under pre-paid plans.

MTC was established in 1994 and provides mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a 15-year technology- and service-neutral concession granted in March 2012 that replaced its earlier licenses. Under the terms of this concession, MTC is permitted to offer 2G, 3G and 4G services. MTC commenced offering 4G services in Windhoek, the capital of Namibia, in May 2012 and, as of December 31, 2015, MTC provided 4G services to 65% of cities in Namibia.

In 2006, a license was granted to Powercom to provide mobile telecommunications services in Namibia. Powercom commenced operations in 2007. In November 2012, Telecom Namibia, the incumbent provider of fixed-line telecommunications services in Namibia and a wholly-owned subsidiary of NPTH, acquired Powercom. Telecom Namibia re-launched Powercom’s portfolio of service plans under the brand “TN Mobile” in August 2013. In November 2013, TN Mobile began offering 4G services in Windhoek and other urban areas.

During 2015, MTC focused its marketing efforts and commercial activity on selling new pre-paid plans with increased data packages in an effort to differentiation itself from its competitors and promoting the upselling of new pricing plans aimed at increasing usage and revenues.

CVTelecom, Cape Verde

PT Ventures owns 40% of the share capital of CVTelecom, a provider of fixed-line and mobile services in the Cabo Verde Islands. In 2000, PT Ventures, entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the other shareholders of CVTelecom, regarding governance and liquidity rights relating to CVTelecom, which allowed PT Ventures to set and control the financial and operating policies of CVTelecom. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal, we fully consolidated CVTelecom in our financial statements as of December 31, 2014. In November 2014, the Government of Cape Verde, which is a shareholder of CVTelecom, notified us that as a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal, the shareholders’ agreement governing CVTelecom had been terminated. At a general shareholders’ meeting of CVTelecom in March 2015, we were only able to elect three of the seven members of the board of directors of CVTelecom. In March 2015, we commenced arbitration proceedings disputing this interpretation of the shareholders’ agreement, and we intend to vigorously defend our rights under the shareholders’ agreement. We are currently engaged in negotiations with the other shareholder of CVTelecom to seek an alternative resolution of this dispute. As a result of this dispute, for dates and periods ending after January 1, 2015, we have recorded our interest in CVTelecom under the equity method.

As of December 31, 2015, CVTelecom had approximately 54,200 fixed-lines in service, which represents approximately 10.6 fixed main lines per 100 inhabitants. As of December 31, 2015, CVTelecom had approximately 404,000 active mobile telephone cards.

CVTelecom was established in 1995 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a 25-year license granted in 1996. In December 2011, CVTelecom was granted a license to provide 3G services in Cabo Verde. In May 2012, CVTelecom’s connection to the West African Cable System, a submarine cable which connects CVTelecom’s network to networks in West Africa and Europe, began operating.

In 2006, the National Communications Agency (Agência Nacional das Comunicações) granted the second license to provide fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services in Cabo Verde to T Plus S.A., or T Plus, which commenced operations under the brand “T+” in December 2007. In December 2011, T Plus was granted a license to provide 3G services in Cabo Verde. In October 2012, a controlling interest in T Plus was acquired by Unitel Holdings, which is controlled by Mrs. Isabel dos Santos.

During 2014, CVTelecom launched several commercial offers, both mobile and fixed lines, aimed at promoting usage and customer loyalty, including: (1) the development of a youth segment, based on the “Powa Swag” service, (2) the launch of several voice promotions, such as “Di Borla Domingão,” and (3) the development of “ZAP,” an NPlay offer. As of December 31, 2015, broadband and IPTV customers represented 28.2% and 10.9% of CVTelecom’s fixed line customer base, respectively.

CST São Tomé and Principe

Africatel indirectly owns 51.0%51% of the share capital of CST, which providesa provider of fixed and mobile services in São Tomé and Principe. As of December 31, 2015, CST had approximately 155,300 mobile customers.

CSTPrincipe, that was established in 1989 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a20-year license granted in 2007. CST began offering 3G

Directel

Africatel indirectly owns 100% of the share capital of Directel, a Portuguese entity with subsidiaries in Angola, Cabo Verde, Mozambique, and Kenya, which publish telephone directories and operate related data bases in those countries.

TPT

We own 76.14% of the share capital of TPT, a Portuguese holding company that owns 54.01% of the share capital of Timor Telecom, S.A., or Timor Telecom, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in São Tomé and PrincipeTimor Leste in March 2012 anticipating the connection of its network to the Africa Coast to Europe submarine cable which was inaugurated at the end of 2012. In March 2013, the General Regulatory Authority (Autoridade Geral de Regulação), the telecommunications regulator in São Tomé and Principe granted the second license to provide fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services in São Tomé and Principe to Unitel Holdings, which is controlled by Mrs. Isabel dos Santos. The second operator commenced commercial activity in July 2014.

During 2015, CST worked on several initiatives designed to promote its commercial brand and customer loyalty in order to mitigate the effectsAsia. Our wholly-owned subsidiary PT Participações also holds 3.05% of the new competitor. In addition, CST also launched a new data link between the islandsshare capital of São Tomé and Principe, which increased the capacity more than nine times compare to the previous link connecting the two islands.Timor Telecom.

Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

Overview

Our business, including the nature of the services we provide and the rates we charge, is subject to comprehensive regulation under the General Telecommunications Law, and a comprehensive regulatory framework for the provision of telecommunications services promulgated by ANATEL. We provide fixed-line, domestic and international long-distance, and mobile telecommunications, data transmission andPay-TV services under concessions, authorizations and licenses that were granted by ANATEL and allow us to provide specified services in designated geographic areas, as well as set forth certain obligations with which we must comply. See “— Concessions, Authorizations and Licenses.”

ANATEL is aan administratively independent and financially autonomous regulatory agency that was established in July 1997 pursuant to the General Telecommunications Law and theANATEL Regulation (Regulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). ANATEL oversees our activities and enforces the General Telecommunications Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. ANATEL is administratively independent and is financially autonomous. ANATEL is required to report on its activities to the Brazilian Ministry of Communications. ANATELScience, Technology, Innovations and Communications (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações), and has authority to propose and to issue regulations that are legally binding on telecommunications service providers. ANATEL also has the authority to grant concessions and licenses for all telecommunications services, other than broadcasting services. In addition, ANATEL is authorized to direct and control the provision of services, the shareholding structure of service providers, to apply penalties and to declare the expiration of the concession and authorizations and the return of assets from the concessionaire to the government authority upon termination of the concession. Any regulation or action proposed by ANATEL is subject to a period of public comment, which may include public hearings, and ANATEL’s decisions may be challenged administratively before the agency itself or through the Brazilian judicial system.

Concessions and Authorizations

The current regulatory framework for the Brazilian telecommunications industry was adopted in 1998. Under the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL regulations, the right to provide telecommunications services is granted either through a concession under the public regime (as discussed below) or an authorization under the private regime (as discussed below). A concession is granted for a fixed period of time following a public auction and is generally renewable only once.renewable. An authorization is granted for an indeterminate period of time and public auctions are held for some authorizations. These concessions and authorizations allow service providers to provide specific services in designated geographic areas, set forth certain obligations with which the service providers must comply and require equal treatment of customers by the service providers.

The three principal providers of fixed-line telecommunications services in Brazil, Telefônica Brasil, EmbratelClaro and our company, provide these services under the public regime. In addition, CTBC and Sercomtel, which are secondary local fixed-line telecommunications service providers, operate under the public regime. All of the other providers of fixed-line telecommunications services and all providers of personal mobile services and data transmission services in Brazil operate under the private regime.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. For more information, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Public Regime

Overview

Providers of public regime services are subject to more obligations and restrictions than providers of private regime services. Under Brazilian law, providers of public regime services are subject to certain requirements with respect to services such as network expansion and network modernization. Additionally,Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the PGMU, which was most recently updated in December 2018. For more information about the PGMU and our obligations thereunder, see “—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

In addition, public regime service providers, as well as private regime service providers, are required to comply with the provisions of: (1) the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013 and was partially superseded by the RQUAL in December 2019; and (2) the General Plan on Competition Targets (Plano Geral de Metas de Competição), or PGMC, which was adopted by ANATEL in November 2012 and updated in July 2018. For more information about the RGQ, the RQUAL and the PGMC see “ —Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ),” “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)” and “ —Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

The rates that public regime service providers may charge customers are subject to ANATEL supervision. Another distinctive feature of public concessions is the right of the concessionaire to maintain certain economic and financial standards, which are calculated based on the rules set forth in ourthe concession agreements and waswere designed based on a price cap model. The concessionsFor more information, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Rate Regulation.”

Concessions are granted for a fixed20 years.Whereas prior to the passage of Law No. 13,897, only one20-year renewal period was allowed, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of time and are generally renewable only once.

Our concession agreements provide thatthem under the applicable concession. ANATEL may modify their terms in 2015 and 2020 and may revoke them prior to expiration underterminate the circumstancesconcession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of certain events described below under “—Termination of a Concession.” The modification right permits ANATEL to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. ANATEL is obligated to engage in public consultation in connection with each of these potential modifications.

On June 27, 2014, ANATEL opened a public comment period for the 2015 revision of the terms of our concession agreements. The comment period, which ended on December 26, 2014, was opened for comments on certain topics such as service universalization, rates and fees, among others. We submitted our comments during this period. Throughout 2015, ANATEL, the Brazilian Ministry of Communications and telecommunications service providers met regularly to discuss possible amendments to each of the concession agreements granted by ANATEL, including ours, and the implications of the developments and demands in the telecommunications sector in recent years. In September 2015, the Ministry of Communications created a working group, consisting of three members from each of ANATEL and the Ministry of Communications, to evaluate the status of the concessions and propose guidelines for the amendment of the concession agreements. In November 2015, the Ministry of Communications opened public consultation on the new regulatory framework for telecommunications. The Ministry of Communications has extended the deadline for contributions on multiple occasions. In April 2016, the Ministry of Communications, based on the working group’s findings, issued a decree addressing guidelines for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, which will be implemented by ANATEL through the conclusion of the concession amendments. The guidelines provide for, among other things, the expansion of broadband services (including in rural regions), the elimination of the reversibility of assets, and an extension of the term of our concessions, which are currently scheduled to expire in 2025. As a result of the publication of these guidelines, ANATEL requested a further postponement of the review of our concession agreements, which was granted. As a result of this extension, the review of our concession agreements is currently scheduled to occur by December 2016.

Providers of private regime services, although not generally subject to the requirements concerning continuity and universality of service and network modernization, are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their respective authorizations.

Under the concession agreements and authorizations, each of the service providers is required to comply with the provisions of (1) the General Plan onof Universal Service Goals that was adopted by ANATEL in June 2003, (2) the General Plan on Quality Goals that was adopted by ANATEL in June 2003, and (3) the General Plan on Competition Targets that was adopted by ANATEL in November 2012. Regulatory provisions are included in the relevant concession agreements and authorizations, and the service providers are subject to public service principles of continuity, changeability and equal treatment of customers.

In addition, ANATEL is authorized to direct and control the provision of services, to apply penalties and to declare the expiration of the concession and the return of assets from the concessionaire to the government authority upon termination of the concession.

Regulation of Fixed-Line Services

Rate Regulation(PGMU)

Under the concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to offer basic local fixed-line plans to users. Rates for long-distance services originated and terminated on fixed lines vary in accordance with certain criteria. The concession agreements establish a price-cap mechanism for annual rate adjustments for basic

service plans and domestic long-distance rates based on formulas set forth in each provider’s concession agreement. The formula provides for two adjustments to the price cap based on the local rate basket, the long-distance rate basket and the use of a price index. The price cap is first revised upward to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by an index, then ANATEL applies a productivity discount factor, or Factor X, which reduces the impact of the rate readjustment provided by the index.

ANATEL has calculated the sector’s weighted average productivity rate. As of the date of this annual report, Factor X is equal to (1) 50% of the increase in the weighted average productivity rate of public regime providers, plus (2) 75% of a factor calculated by ANATEL that is designed to reflect cost optimization targets for the telecommunications industry as a whole. If the weighted average productivity rate is negative, ANATEL will not allow an annual adjustment in excess of the IST.

ANATEL has proposed new regulations under which it would modify the Factor X applicable to the determination of rate increases available to public concessionaires providing fixed-line services. ANATEL expected to launch a public consultation process relating to these proposed regulations during 2016.

A provider may increase rates for individual services within the local rate basket or the long-distance rate basket by up to 5% more than the IST so long as the rates for other services in that rate basket are reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that the weighted average increase for the entire rate basket does not exceed the permitted annual rate adjustment.

A provider may also offer alternative plans in addition to the basic service plan. Alternative plans must be submitted for ANATEL’s approval. The rates offered under the alternative plans may be adjusted annually based on the IST.

For information on our rates and service plans, see “—Rates.”

General Plan on Universal Service Goals

The General Plan on Universal Service Goals was approved by ANATEL in June 2011. The General Plan on Universal Service GoalsPGMU sets forth the principal network expansion and modernization obligations of the public regime providers. The PGMU was approved by Decree No. 9,619 and became effective on December 21, 2018, the date when it was published in the Official Gazette.

Public regime providers are subject to network expansion requirements under the General Plan on Universal Service Goals,PGMU, which are revised by ANATEL from time to time. No subsidies or other supplemental financings are anticipated to finance our network expansion obligations. Our failure to meet the network expansion and modernization obligations established by the General Plan on Universal Service GoalsPGMU or in our concession agreements may result in fines and penalties of up to R$50 million for eachnon-compliance with an obligation or rule as verified in an administrative process, as well as potential revocation of our concessions.

The General Plan on Universal Service Goals, as amended,PGMU requires the following, among other things:

 

local fixed-line service providers to provide individual access to fixed-line voice services to economically disadvantaged segments of the Brazilian population within their service areas, through programs to be established and regulated by ANATEL;

 

local fixed-line service providers to provideinstall public telephones on demand in urban areas within theirlocations with more than 100 inhabitants;

local fixed-line service areas, including in localities with a population in excess of 100, andproviders to install residential fixed lines in locations with more than 300 inhabitants (1) in regions where there is no fixed line installed, within seven120 days of a request and (2) in localities withregions where fixed lines are already installed, within 7 days of a populationrequest for 90% of requests and in excessup to 25 days of 300;a request for the remaining 10% of requests; and

 

local and long-distance fixed-line service providers that obtain authorizations to use radio spectrumgradually provide voice access in the 450 Mhz bandwireless local loop technology with capacity for 4G services in 1,400 locations (of which 1,155 apply to provide universal service in ruralOi), according to the following schedule: 10% of such locations by December 31, 2019; 25% by December 31, 2020; 45% by December 31, 2021; 70% by December 31, 2022; and remote areas, as well as100% by December 31, 2023.

Similarly to provide individual and group access to fixed-line voice services.

The General Plan on Universal Service Goals is expected to be amended again in 2016 In connection with the 2008 amendments to the PGMU that eliminated the requirements to provide public telephone centers (postos de serviço telefônico) in exchange for building backhaul, the 2018 PGMU eliminated the requirements to provide multifacility service centers (postos de serviço multifacilidade), which are public centers located in rural areas that offer various telecommunications services, including voice, access to the internet and digital transmission of text and images, and to install and maintain public telephones within a fixed-line service concession, agreements.in exchange for other obligations to be defined.

The value of the obligations currently imposed by the PGMU and, therefore, the cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, is subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation.

Termination of a Concession

ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of any of the following:

an extraordinary situation jeopardizing the public interest, in which case the Brazilian government is authorized to start rendering the services set forth under the concession in lieu of the concessionaire, subject to congressional authorization and payment of adequate indemnification to the owner of the terminated concession;

termination by the provider (through an agreement with ANATEL or pursuant to legal proceedings) as a consequence of an act or omission of the Brazilian government that makes the rendering of the services excessively burdensome to the provider;

annulment of the concession due to a contractual term, which is deemed by subsequent law to be illegal;

material failure to comply with the provider’s universalization targets;

failure to meet insurance requirements set forth in the concession agreement;

asplit-up,spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the provider’s control without ANATEL’s authorization;

the transfer of the concession without ANATEL’s authorization;

the dissolution or bankruptcy of the provider; or

an extraordinary situation in which Brazilian government intervention, although legally permissible, is not undertaken, as such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in an unfair benefit to the provider.

In the event a concession is terminated, ANATEL is authorized to administer the provider’s properties and its employees in order to continue rendering services.

Service Restrictions

Pursuant to regulations in effect as of the date of this annual report, publicPublic regime service providers are subject to certain restrictions on alliances, joint ventures and mergers and acquisitions with other public regime providers, including:

 

a prohibition on members of the same economic group holding more than two licenses for the provision of telecommunications services in the public regime, which would include holding more than 20% of the voting shares of or controlling (as such term is defined under ANATEL’s regulations) more than one other providertwo providers of public regime telecommunications services; and

 

a restriction on mergers between regional fixed-line service providers.

a restriction, as set forth in the General Grant Plan (Plano General de Outorgas), or PGO, on mergers between providers of public regime telecommunications services.

In December 2010, ANATEL adopted new regulations eliminating the limitation on the number of authorizations to provide subscription television services. In September 2011, Law No. 12,485 became effective, which creates a new legal framework for subscription television services in Brazil, replacing and unifying the previously existing regulatorydetermines, among other provisions that governed various forms of subscription television services, such as cable television, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service, or MMDS, and DTH. The principal provisions of Law No. 12,485:to:

 

allow fixed-line telephone concessionaires, such as us, who previously were allowed to provide subscription television services using only MMDS and DTH technologies, to enter the cable television market in Brazil;

 

remove existing restrictions on foreign capital investments in cable television providers;

 

establish minimum quotas for domestic content programming on every television channel;

limit the total and voting capital held by broadcast concessionaires and authorized providers, and in television programmers and producers, with headquarters in Brazil to 30%; and

 

prohibit telecommunications service providers with collective interests from acquiring rights to disseminate images of events of national interest and from hiring domestic artistic talent.

Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law. Law No. 13,879 will allow providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime, including the inability of providers to sell certain property, plant and equipment used to provide fixed-line telephone services. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations, such as the methodology for calculating the cost of investments that providers will need to undertake as well as deadlines to complete the conversions. A draft of the new form of authorization agreement was also provided. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Private Regime

Providers of private regime services, although not generally subject to the requirements concerning continuity and universality of service and network modernization, are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their respective authorizations and applicable regulation.

For example, private regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the RGQ and the PGMC. For more information about the RGQ and the PGMC, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ)” and “—Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

Our Services

Fixed-Line Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

We provide the majority of our fixed-line telephone services (Serviço Telefônico Fixo Comutado—STFC) in accordance with concession agreements under the public regime. For more information about the regulations applicable to public regime telephone service providers, see “—Public Regime.”

Our Concessions and Authorizations

The following table sets forth certain details of our concessions and authorizations to provide local, domestic long-distance and international long-distanced fixed-line telephone services:

Geographic Scope

Type of Service

Termination Date

Regime

Region I of the PGO – States of Rio De Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraiba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, Maranhão, Pará, Amapá, Amazonas e Roraima, except Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region I of the PGO – Sector 3(1)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region II of the PGO – States of Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande Do Sul, except for Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceDecember 31, 2025(2)Concession
Region II of the PGO—Sectors 20, 22 and 25(3)Local / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
Region III of the PGO – São PauloLocal / Domestic Long-DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization
NationalInternational Long DistanceIndeterminateAuthorization

(1)

Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO corresponds to 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais.

(2)

Concession agreements may be amended by the parties every five years prior to their termination date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Our concession agreements were last amended in 2011. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

(3)

Sectors 20, 22 and 25 of Region II of the PGO correspond to the following municipalities: Londrina, Paraná; Tamarana, Paraná; (Sector 22) Paranaíba, Mato Grosso do Sul (Sector 25); Buriti Alegre, Goiás; Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás; Inaciolândia, Goiás; Itumbiara, Goiás; Paranaiguara, Goiás; and São Simão, Goiás.

Each of our concession agreements:

sets forth the parameters that govern adjustments to our rates;

requires us to comply with the network expansion obligations set forth in the PGMU;

requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year;

In addition, each of our concession and authorization agreements:

sets forth the conditions under which ANATEL may access information from us;

requires us to comply with certain quality of service obligations as well as the quality of service obligations set forth in the RGQ;

requires us to pay fines for anynon-compliance with the regulatory rules including systemic service interruptions.

In addition, the PGMU requires us to provide transmission lines connecting our fiber-optic internet backbones to municipalities in our concession areas in which we did not provide internet service, which we refer to as backhaul. Under these concession agreements, we are obligated to set up backhaul in 3,188 municipalities in Regions I and II. The facilities that we constructed to meet these obligations are considered to be property that is part of our concessions and will therefore revert to the Brazilian government on January 1, 2026. For more information about the PGMU, see “—Public Regime—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law.”

In addition, in connection with the consideration of revisions to the concession agreements under the public regime, in January 2017, ANATEL proposed revisions to the terms of the PGO, in line with the provisions of PLC 79 (the bill that preceded Law No. 13, 789). However, despite the passage of Law No. 13,789, we cannot predict when and to what extent ANATEL will revise the PGO.

We cannot assure you that the implementation of Law No. 13,879 or any future amendments to our concession agreements (including renewals) or the PGO will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the migration of our concessions to the private regime or the amendments to our concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Rate Regulation

Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to offer basic local fixed-line plans to users. Rates for the basic long-distance services plan originated and terminated on fixed lines vary in accordance with certain criteria. The concession agreements establish aprice-cap mechanism for annual rate adjustments for basic service plans and basic domestic long-distance plans based on formulas set forth in each provider’s concession agreement. The formula provides for two adjustments to the price cap based on the local rate basket, the long-distance rate basket and the use of a price index. The price cap is first revised upward to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by an index, then ANATEL applies a productivity discount factor, or Factor X, which reduces the impact of the rate readjustment provided by the index.

Factor X is equal to (1) 50% of the increase in the productivity rate of public regime providers, plus (2) 75% of a factor calculated by ANATEL that is designed to reflect cost optimization targets for the telecommunications industry as a whole. If the weighted average productivity rate is negative, ANATEL will not allow an annual adjustment in excess of the IST.

A provider may increase rates for individual services within the local rate basket or the long-distance rate basket by up to 5% more than the IST so long as the rates for other services in that rate basket are reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that the weighted average increase for the entire rate basket does not exceed the permitted annual rate adjustment.

A provider may also offer alternative plans in addition to the basic service plan. Alternative plans must be submitted for ANATEL’s approval. The rates offered under the alternative plans may be adjusted annually based on the IST.

Local Rates. Our revenues from local fixed-line services consist mainly of monthly subscription charges, charges for local calls and charges for the activation of lines for new subscribers or subscribers that have changed addresses. Monthly subscription charges are based on the plan to which the customer subscribes and whether the customer is a residential, commercial or trunk line customer.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan. In addition to the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan, we are permitted to offernon-discriminatory alternative plans to the basic service plans. The rates for applicable services under these plans must be submitted for ANATEL approval prior to offering those plans to our customers. Historically, ANATEL has generally not raised objections to the terms of these plans.

On an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum rates that we are permitted to charge for our basic service plans. In addition, we are authorized to adjust the rates applicable to our alternative plans annually by no more than the rate of inflation, as measured by the Telecommunications Services Index (Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações – IST), or IST. Discounts from the rates set in basic service plans and alternative service plans may be granted to customers without ANATEL approval.

Local FixedLine-to-Mobile Rates(VC-1) and Mobile Long Distance Rates(VC-2 andVC-3).When one of our fixed-line customers makes a call to a mobile subscriber of our company or another mobile services provider that terminates in the mobile registration area in which the call was originated, we charge our fixed-line customerper-minute charges for the duration of the call based on rates designated by ANATEL asVC-1 rates. In turn, we pay the mobile services provider aper-minute charge based on rates designated by ANATEL as mobile termination, or MTR, rates for the use of its mobile network in completing the call. Rates for long-distance calls that originate or terminate on mobile telephones are based on whether the call is an intrasectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL asVC-2 rates, or an intersectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL asVC-3 rates. If the caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for the call, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates.VC-1,VC-2 andVC-3 rates, collectively, the “VC Rates” vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on aper-minute basis. On an annual basis, ANATEL may increase or decrease the maximum VC Rates that we are permitted to charge.

FixedLine-to-Fixed-Line Long Distance Rates. If a caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for a long-distance call that originates and terminates on fixed-line telephones, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates. Rates for these long-distance calls are based on the physical distance separating callers (which are categorized by four distance ranges), time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on aper-minute basis for the duration of the call. On an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum domestic fixedline-to-fixed line long-distance rates that we are permitted to charge.

For more information about the rates applicable to our fixed-line services, see “—Rates, Billing and Collection—Rates.”

General Plan on Quality Goals (RGQ)

The RGQ for fixed-line voice services was approved by ANATEL in December 2012 and became effective in June 2013. Each fixed-line service provider operating under the public regime or the private regime must comply with the provisions of the RGQ. All costs related to compliance with the quality goals established by the RGQ must be borne exclusively by the service provider. The RGQ establishes minimum quality standards with regard to:

customer complaints;

responses to repair requests;

responses to change of address requests; and

quality of public telephones.

These quality standards are measured according to the definitions and quality indicators established by ANATEL. The indicators, as well as their respective methods of collection, calculation and other quality requirements, are defined in specific regulations published by ANATEL.

ANATEL measures the performance of fixed-line service providers in each individual state in which they operate. As a result, the performance of fixed-line service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, fixed-line service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular area codes.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured, for public consultation. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the RGQ obligations. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “—Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Mobile Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

In September 2000, ANATEL adopted regulations that established operating rules for providers under the personal mobile service (Serviço Móvel Pessoal—SMP) regime. The regulations permitted ANATEL to grant authorizations to provide mobile telecommunications services under the personal mobile service regime. For purposes of the personal mobile service regulations, Brazil is divided into three service regions covering the same geographic areas as the concessions for fixed-line telecommunications services.

Auction of 3G Spectrum. In preparation for auctions of spectrum in Bands F, G, I and J (2.1 GHz), the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 3G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divide the Brazilian territory into nine regions for purposes of operations using these frequency bands. In December 2007, ANATEL auctioned radiofrequency licenses to operate on each of these frequency bands in each of the nine regions and the related licenses to use these frequency bands. In this auction, we acquired the radio frequency licenses necessary to offer 3G services in eight of the nine regions delineated by ANATEL for 3G services (corresponding to Regions I, II and III under the personal mobile services regime, other than an area in Region III that consists of 23 municipalities in the interior of the State of São Paulo that includes the city of Franca and surrounding areas).

Authorizations to Use 450 MHz Band and 2.5 GHz Band. In preparation for auctions of the 450MHz band and 2.5 GHz band, the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 4G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divided the Brazilian territory into three regions for purposes of providing personal mobile services. In June 2012, ANATEL auctioned radio frequency licenses to operate and the related licenses to use the frequency bands in the following manner: (1) four national lots for 2.5 GHz bands, each accompanied by a regional band of 450 MHz, and (2) 132 regional lots for 2.5GHz bands, including “P” band radiofrequencies. In this auction, we acquired (1) one of the national lots for 2.5 GHz and the corresponding regional lot of 450MHz to provide rural broadband services in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District, and (2) 11 regional lots for “P” band radiofrequencies. Since that time, we have waived our right to use and/or chosen not to renew our “P” band authorizations.

Network Sharing. In 2013, ANATEL and Brazil’s national competition regulator (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica), or CADE, approved the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement between TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, for the construction, implementation and mutual assignment of network tools to support personal mobile services (voice and broadband) in the 2.5 GHz band, among others, in order to ensure compliance with the scope of 4G commitments.

In 2014, TIM and Oi agreed to negotiate the joint construction, implementation and reciprocal assignment of elements of their respective 2G and 3G network infrastructures, which was approved by ANATEL and CADE.

In 2015, ANATEL and CADE approved the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement between Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, for the construction, implementation and mutual assignment of network tools to support personal mobile services (voice and broadband) in the 2.5 GHz band, among others, in order to ensure compliance with the scope of commitments. With respect to the latter agreement, ANATEL rejected the proposal to conduct RAN sharing in conurbations because it detected interference in the service. As a result, ANATEL will not allow RAN sharing in municipalities experiencing interference until a solution has been found.

In 2018, ANATEL and CADE approved an amendment to the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement between TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, to update the technology covered by the agreement and to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

Our Authorizations

We hold radiofrequency spectrum authorizations to provide 2G, 3G and 4G services in Regions I, II and III. The majority of these authorizations grant us permission to use the applicable radio spectrum for 15 years from the date of the authorization agreement under which they are granted and are renewable for additional15-year terms. Upon renewal of any of these authorizations and on every second anniversary of such renewal, we will be required to pay an amount equal to 2.0% of our prior year’s net operating revenue from personal mobile services. The initial terms of one of our radio frequency spectrum authorizations expired in 2016 and was extended for an additional15-year term. Following the passage of Law No. 13,879 in October 2019, mobile telephone service providers may renew their radiofrequency spectrum authorizations indefinitely without undergoing new auctions. However, there is doubt as to whether this new framework will be applicable for authorizations in effect at the time of the law was changed. As a result, we cannot be certain that we will be able to renew our existing authorizations indefinitely without undergoing new auctions.

The following table sets forth certain information about our authorizations to provide mobile telephone services:

Termination Date

Geographic Scope

900 MHz1,800 MHz(1)2,100 MHz
(3G)
2,600MHz
(4G)(2)(3)
Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Amazonas, Roraima, Amapá, Pará, Maranhão, Bahia, Sergipe, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco and AlagoasMarch 2031*April 2023October 2027
Rio de Janeiro, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais and Pernambuco(4)March 2031*
Amazonas, Alagoas, Paraíba, Piauí e Rio Grande do Norte, Pará, Maranhão, Roraima, Espírito Santo, Bahia and SergipeMarch 2031*
Acre, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, Tocantins, Federal District, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande de SulDecember 2032*December 2032*April 2023
Mato Grosso and Goiás(5)April 2023
Federal District Mato Grosso, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Santa Catarina, Rondônia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás(6)April 2023October 2027
São PauloDecember 2022(7)December 2022April 2023October 2027

*

The expiration dates of these licenses have already been extended and these licenses are not eligible for additional extensions.

(1)

We have secondary use of 1,800 MHz radiofrequencies under authorizations provided to TIM in Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Sergipe, Ceará, Santa Catarina e Goiás, with the same termination dates as the underlying authorizations granted to TIM (from April 2023 through April 2028).

(2)

We no longer have authorizations for the “P” Band.

(3)

We have secondary use ofsub-bands “X” and “VI” in the 2.5 GHz radiofrequencies under authorizations provided to Telefônica and TIM in all of Brazil, with the same termination dates as the underlying authorizations granted to Telefônica and TIM.

(4)

Sector 1 of the State of Rio de Janeiro; sectors 2 and 3 of the State of Minas Gerais; sector 5 of the State of Bahia; sector 8 of the State of Pernambuco; and sector 11 of the State of Ceará.

(5)

“H” Band Sector 22 (Paranaíba/MS) and Sector 25 (municipalities of Buriti Alegre, Cachoeira Dourada, Inaciolândia, Itumbiara, Paranaiguara and São Simão in the State of Goiás).

(6)

Sub-band “F.” except in the States of Paranaíba and Mato Grosso do Sul and the municipalities of Buriti Alegre, Cachoeira Dourada, Inaciolândia, Itumbiara, Paranaiguara and São Simão in the State of Goiás.

(7)

Except AR11 and sector 33.

Our authorization agreements are also subject to network scope and contains service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements, under which we are required to service all municipalities in Brazil with a population in excess of 100,000 habitants.

Under our 3G authorizations, as of the date of this annual report we are also required to (1) provide service to 459 municipalities that did not have mobile services at the time these licenses were granted with either 2G or 3G mobile telecommunications services, (2) provide 3G service to 50% of all of the municipalities with a population between 30,000 and 100,000, and (3) provide 3G service to 60% of the municipalities, including 684 specified municipalities, covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000.

Under our 4G authorizations, as of the date of this annual report we are also required to provide 4G service in (1) all municipalities with a population of 30,000 or more and (2) 60% by December 31, 2018 and 100% by December 31, 2019 of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000; provided, however, that for the latter, we may comply with this obligation by providing service with transmission rates equal to or greater than those set for the 1.9/2.1 GHz (3G) bands;

In 2012 we acquired 450 MHz license on the 4G services auction, which requires us to, in 964 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District: (1) provide voice services in the 450 MHz or other spectrum granted to us and data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 1 Mbps and a minimum monthly allowance of 500 MB in rural areas; (2) provide unlimited data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 1 Mbps to rural schools in those municipalities; and (3) make our fixed-line network available to other telecommunications service providers to allow them to comply with their obligations under the PGMU.

As of the date of this annual report, although we believe that we are in compliance with the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these licenses, ANATEL is debating our compliance with certain obligations to provide services under the 450 MHz spectrums. Since we did not have all of the necessary systems in place to support the use of the 450 MHz spectrum using land frequencies by the required deadline, we have been meeting our coverage obligations in certain areas using satellites. If ANATEL makes a final decision that we have not been meeting our obligations, our authorizations to use 450 MHz frequencies may be terminated. As of the date of this annual report, ANATEL’s determination regarding this matter is suspended by court order.

For most obligations, a municipality is considered “serviced” when the covered service area contains at least 80% of the urban area in the municipality. Our failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in ANATEL regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in termination of our authorizations to use those radiofrequencies by ANATEL. As of the date of this annual report, although we believe that we are in compliance with the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements, ANATEL has not yet made its final determination with respect to our compliance with certain obligations to provide services under the 450 MHz/900 MHz/1800 MHz/2100 and 2500 MHz spectrums. Furthermore, we have obtained judicial protection under the RJ Proceedings to forego renewal of many of the performance guarantees we would have otherwise been required to maintain with respect to the obligations under discussion.

Our 4G radio frequency authorizations also impose minimum investment obligations in domestic technologies. At least 65% of the cost of all goods, services, equipment, telecommunications systems and data networks that we purchase to meet our 4G service obligations must be developed in Brazil. As of the date of this annual report, ANATEL has recognized that our obligations to use domestic technology have not been met in the past due to the unavailability of such products in Brazil, and has consequently not sanctioned us. This minimum requirement will increase to 70% by December 31, 2022.

Roaming

Under the PGMC, a mobile services provider with significant market power, such as our company, must offer roaming services to other mobile services providers without significant market power at the maximum rate that the mobile services provider with significant market power is permitting ANATEL to offer such services to its retail customers.

In March 2017, ANATEL began a pilot program with the four principal mobile services providers, including our company, to share infrastructure costs to expand the existing voice roaming agreements to voice and data roaming services to 35 municipalities with fewer than 30,000 residents. As a result of this program, which is ongoing and is in the process of expansion to include additional mobile service providers and additional municipalities with fewer than 30,000 residents, the providers began or resumed discussions about voice and data roaming tariffs and the timeline to implement the requirements of the program. As of the date of this annual report, certain providers, including our company, have entered into bilateral agreements regarding these matters, and new municipalities count on roaming coverage, increasing satisfaction to our clients.

Rate Regulation

Mobile telecommunications service in Brazil is offered on a “calling-party-pays” basis under which a mobile subscriber pays only for calls that he or she originates (in addition to roaming charges paid on calls made or received outside the subscriber’s home registration area). A mobile subscriber receiving a collect call is also required to pay mobile usage charges.

Our revenues from mobile services consist mainly of charges for local and long-distance calls and data packages paid by ourpre-paid and post-paid mobile subscribers and monthly subscription charges paid by our post-paid plan subscribers. Monthly subscription charges are based on a post-paid subscriber’s service plan. If one of our mobile subscribers places or receives a call from a location outside of his or her home registration area, we are permitted to charge that customer the applicable roaming rate. We charge for all mobile calls made by ourpre-paid customers, and for mobile calls made by our post-paid customers in excess of their allocated monthly number of minutes, on aper-minute basis. Rates under our mobile plans may be adjusted annually by no more than the rate of inflation, as measured by theIGP-DI.

Quality Regulation

Our personal mobile services authorizations impose obligations on us to meet quality of service standards.

To restructure the process of assessing the quality of mobile service, with the inclusion of processes and measurement of indicators to check the quality of mobile broadband and the quality perceived by the user, ANATEL published Resolution 575/2011, approving the Regulation for the Management of Quality of Provision of Personal Mobile Service (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade da Prestação de Serviço Móvel Pessoal), orSMP-RGQ.

TheSMP-RGQ provides for the assessment of the network connection and their respective data transmission rate, assessing aspects of availability, stability and connection speed for the data network. Targets are defined as 80% of speed hired (on average per month) by users and 40% of the instant speed, according to the definitions of Resolution 575/2011.

In January 2018, ANATEL adopted a new model for measuring the quality of mobile broadband networks through the use of smartphones, replacing the previous model that required data from volunteers and often led to statistically insignificant results. The new model, which we have adopted by collecting user data directly from smartphones using theMinha Oiapplication, allows us to better manage the quality of our network, allowing us to identify corrective actions and more efficiently direct investments in our network.

As a result, the performance of mobile telephony service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, mobile telephony service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular area codes.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of theSMP-RGQ obligations. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Multimedia Communication Services

Our Authorizations

We have national Multimedia Communication Service (Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia – SCM) authorizations, which superseded our prior Telecommunications Network Transportation Services (Serviço de Rede de Transporte de Telecomunicações) authorizations, permitting us to provide high speed data service.

The Multimedia Communication Services authorizations became effective in May 2003 and cover the same geographical areas as our concession and personal communication service agreements. In April 2008, in connection with the amendments to our fixed-line services concessions, we agreed to provide internet service free of charge until December 31, 2025 to all urban schools in the areas of our concession agreements.

Rate Regulation

A significant portion of our revenues from commercial data transmission services are generated by monthly charges for EILD and SLD services, which are based on contractual arrangements for the use of part of our networks. Under ANATEL regulations, we are required to make publicly available the forms of agreements that we use for EILD and SLD services, including the applicable rates, and are only permitted to offer these services under these forms of agreements. ANATEL publishes reference rates for these services and if one of our customers objects to the rates that we charge for these services, that customer is entitled to seek to reduce the applicable rate through arbitration before ANATEL.

ANATEL is expected to publish new reference rates for these services in 2020 reflecting a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation.

Quality Regulation

In June 2011, the President of Brazil issued Executive Decree No. 7,512/11, which mandated ANATEL to take the necessary regulatory measures to establish quality standards for broadband internet services. In compliance with such decree, on October 31, 2011, ANATEL published Resolution 574/2011 approving the Multimedia Communication Service Quality Management Regulations (Regulamentação de Gestão da Qualidade do Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia), which identify network quality indicators and establish performance goals for multimedia communications service providers, including broadband internet service providers, with more than 50,000 subscribers. Such providers will be required to collect representative data using dedicated equipment installed at the site of each network connection and be subject to periodic measurements to ensure their compliance with such regulation, including:

average upload and download speeds of at least 80% of contracted speeds for all measurements; and

individual round-trip latencies for fixed-line connections of up to 80 milliseconds per measurement for at least 95% of the measurements.

To increase transparency, customers must be provided with specialized software at no cost to measure their own network quality, although such customer-generated measurements will be included in official calculations.

In January 2018, ANATEL adopted new models for measuring the quality of fixed broadband networks using automated processes that collect data from multiple data points. To measure our fixed broadband network quality, we have implemented the HDM platform. This new method allows us to better manage the quality of our network, allowing us to identify corrective actions and more efficiently direct investments in our network.

Nevertheless, the performance of fixed broadband service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, fixed broadband service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular states.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the existing quality regulation applicable to multimedia communications service providers. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Subscription Television Services

Regulatory Overview

The framework established by Law No. 12,485 of 2011 increased the availability and lowerlowered the price of subscription television services in Brazil, through increased competition among providers, and improveimproved the quality, speed and availability of broadband internet services as a result of the expected proliferation of fiber optic cables used to transmit cable television.

In March 2012, ANATEL adopted new regulations under which the authorizations to provide various existing subscription television services have been consolidated into authorizations to provide a newly-defined service called Conditional Access Service.Service (Serviço de Acesso Condicionado – SeAC). Under these regulations, authorizations to provide Conditional Access Service apply to private telecommunications services, the receipt of which are conditioned on payment by subscribers, for the distribution of audiovisual contents in the form of packages, individual channels and channels with required programming, by means of any communications technology, processes, electronic means or protocols. An authorization granted by ANATEL to provide Conditional Access Service will be valid for the entire Brazilian territory,territory; however, the provider must indicate in its application for an authorization the localities that it will service.

Our Authorizations

In November 2008, we entered into a15-year authorization agreement with ANATEL that governs our use of satellite technology to provide DTH satellite television services throughout Brazil. Under this authorization, we are required to furnish equipment to certain public institutions, to make channels available for broadcasting by specified public institutions, and to comply with quality of service obligations set forth in applicable ANATEL regulations.

In December 2012, ANATEL granted our request to convert our DTH authorization agreement into a Conditional Access Service authorization. In September 2014, we entered into aauthorization allowing us to provide nationwide subscription television services through any technology, including satellite, wireline, optical fiber and coaxial cable. The Conditional Access Service authorization agreement with ANATEL that authorized us to offer the services to be governed by such agreement, including IP TV.TV, and has no termination date. In accordance with Law No. 12,485/11, which approved the Conditional Access Service regime, our Conditional Access Service authorization prohibits us from creating television content or owning more than 30% of a company that creates content. We are also required to carry a certain percentage of Brazilian programming, including open channels and public access channels.

Rate Regulation

The rates and prices for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation and are market-driven.

Termination of a Concession

ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime telecommunications service provider upon the occurrence of any of the following:

an extraordinary situation jeopardizing the public interest, in which case the Brazilian government is authorized to start rendering the services set forth under the concession in lieu of the concessionaire, subject to congressional authorization and payment of adequate indemnification to the owner of the terminated concession;

termination by the provider (through an agreement with ANATEL or pursuant to legal proceedings) as a consequence of an act or omission of the Brazilian government that makes the rendering of the services excessively burdensome to the provider;

annulment of the concession due to a contractual term, which is deemed by subsequent law to be illegal;

material failure to comply with the provider’s universalization targets;

failure to meet insurance requirements set forth in the concession agreement;

a split-up, spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the provider’s control without ANATEL’s authorization;

the transfer of the concession without ANATEL’s authorization;

the dissolution or bankruptcy of the provider; or

an extraordinary situation in which Brazilian government intervention, although legally permissible, is not undertaken, as such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in an unfair benefit to the provider.

In the event a concession is terminated, ANATEL is authorized to administer the provider’s properties and its employees in order to continue rendering services.

General Plan on Quality GoalsRegulation

The General Plan on Quality Goals was approved by ANATEL in June 2003 and became effective in January 2006. Each fixed-line service provider operating under the public regime or the private regime must comply with the provisions of the General Plan on Quality Goals. All costs related to compliance with the quality goals established by the General Plan on Quality Goals must be borne exclusively by the service provider. The General Plan on Quality Goals establishes minimum quality standards with regard to:

modernization of the network;

responses to repair requests;

responses to change of address requests;

rate of call completion;

operator availability;

availability of services to customers;

personal services to customers;

issuance of bills;

responses to mail received from customers; and

quality of public telephones.

service onPay-TV is monitored by ANATEL. These quality standards are measured according to the definitions and quality indicators established by ANATEL. Every month, fixed-line service providers are required to reportResolution 411/2005. The indicators, as well as their compliance withrespective methods of collection, calculation and other quality goals to ANATEL. Additionally, they are obligated to provide ANATEL with an in-depth report and analysis on each quality goal that is not satisfied. ANATEL may also collect such data from fixed-line service providers at any time without prior notice. Fixed-line service providers that fail to meet quality goals established by ANATEL may be subject to warnings, fines, intervention by ANATEL, temporary suspensions of service or cancellation of their concessions and authorizations.

ANATELrequirements, measures the performance of fixed-linePay-TV service providers in each individual stategeographic area in which they operate. As a result, the performance of fixed-linePay-TV service providers in any particular stategeographic area may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory.

For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, fixed-linePay-TV service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one orin each geographic area in which they operate.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the existing quality regulation applicable to subscription television service providers. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more particular states.information, see “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Other Regulatory Matters

Consumer Protection Regulation

In March 2014, ANATEL published a regulation approving the General Regulation on Telecommunications Customers Rights (Regulamento Geral de Direitos do Consumidor de Serviços de Telecomunicações), a single regulation for the telecommunications sector with general rules for customer service, billing, and service offers, which are applicable to fixed, mobile, broadband andPay-TV customers. This regulation establishes a period ranging from 120 days to 24 months from the date of publication for entering into compliance with the new rules. Most of the new rules that expand the rights of those who use the telecommunications services entered into force on July 8, 2014. Our failure to meet the quality of service obligations established by the General Plan on Quality Goals or in our concession agreementscomply with this regulation may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Interconnection Regulations

Under the General Telecommunications Law, all telecommunications service providers are required, if technically feasible, to make their networks available for interconnection on anon-discriminatory basis whenever a request is made by another telecommunications service provider. Interconnection permits a call originated on the network of upa requesting fixed-line or personal mobile services provider’s network to R$40 million.be terminated on the fixed-line or personal mobile services network of the other provider. ANATEL has adopted the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão) to implement these requirements.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Fixed-Line Service Providers

Our revenues from the use of our local fixed-line networks by other telecommunications services providers consist primarily of payments at rates designated by ANATEL asTU-RL rates from:

long-distance service providers to complete calls terminating on our local fixed-line networks;

long-distance service providers for the transfer to their networks of calls originating on our local fixed-line networks; and

mobile services providers to complete calls terminating on our local fixed-line networks.

Fixed-line service providers are not permitted to charge other fixed-line service providers for local fixed-line calls originating on their local fixed-line networks and terminating on the other provider’s local fixed-line networks.

Our revenues from the use of our long-distance networks consist primarily of payments at rates designated by ANATEL asTU-RIU rates from other long-distance carriers that use a portion of our long-distance networks to complete calls initiated by callers that have not selected us as the long-distance provider.

TU-RL andTU-RIU rates vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week and are subject to price caps established by ANATEL. The price cap for interconnection rates varies from service provider to service provider based on the retail prices of each service provider and are adjusted annually by ANATEL at the same time that rates for local and long-distance calls are adjusted. Fixed-line service providers must offer the sameTU-RL andTU-RIU rates to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis.

The maximumTU-RL andTU-RIU rates that ANATEL has permitted us to charge have declined significantly since 2016. In December 2018, ANATEL published the maximum fixed reference rates, includingTU-RL andTU-RIU, for 2020 through 2023, using a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Personal Mobile Services Providers

Our revenues from the use of our mobile networks by other telecommunications services providers consist primarily of payments on aper-minute basis from (1) local fixed-line, long-distance and mobile services providers to complete calls terminating on our mobile networks, and (2) long-distance service providers for the transfer to their networks of calls originating on our mobile networks.

The terms and conditions of interconnection to our mobile networks, including the rates charged to terminate calls on these mobile networks, which are designated by ANATEL as MTR rates, the commercial conditions and technical terms and conditions, may be freely negotiated between us and other mobile and fixed-line telecommunications service providers, subject to compliance with regulations established by ANATEL relating to traffic capacity and interconnection infrastructure that must be made available to requesting providers, among other things.

Personal mobile services providers must offer the same MTR rate to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis. ANATEL must determine that the intercompany agreements meet certain formal requirements before they become effective. These agreements may be rejected if they are contrary to the principles of free competition and the applicable regulations. If the providers cannot agree upon the terms and conditions of the interconnection agreements, ANATEL may determine terms and conditions by arbitration. Since no agreement with fixed-line service providers could be reached regarding MTR rates when we began offering personal mobile services, ANATEL set the initial MTR rates.

In December 2018, ANATEL published the maximum fixed reference rates for 2020 through 2023, using a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which established a new quality management model and immediately superseded certain provisions of the quality regulations then in existence. In addition, the RQUAL provides standardized rules regarding communications and reimbursement to users impacted by service interruptions.

Pursuant to the new model, telecommunications services providers will be evaluated on the basis of three indices: (1) service quality; (2) perceived quality; and (3) user complaints. Providers will be given annual grades, ranging from “A” (best) to “E” (worst), at the national, state and municipal levels. Customers whose providers receive “E” grades will be able to break their contracts without paying a fine regardless of the length of the contract or remaining term. The RQUAL will also replace the existing sanctioning regime. Providers will no longer automatically receive fines for not complying with quality targets. The RQUAL also provides for the replacement of the automatic sanctioning rules (fines fornon-compliance with targets), by the adoption of specific measures and appropriate to the specific case, in order to guarantee the improvement of quality standards.

The RQUAL provides for the creation of a technical quality group, including representatives from ANATEL and various service providers, and a quality assessment support entity, with the aim of creating a manual that defines the technical parameters that will comprise the quality indicators and establishes the criteria for service interruptions and reimbursements. ANATEL’s board of directors will then be required to approve the manual, which is expected to become effective in 2021. At that time, the prior quality regulations applicable to telecommunications services providers, including the RGQ, among others, will be revoked and fully superseded by the RQUAL.

General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC)

The General Plan on Competition Targets,PGMC, which was approved by ANATEL, and became effective in November 2012 and was updated in July 2018, contemplates the creation of one entity to manage information about telecommunications networks, act as an intermediary in contracts between telecommunications providers and supervise the offering of wholesale data traffic services. The General Plan on Competition TargetsPGMC also addresses a variety of other matters relating to both fixed-line and mobile service providers, including criteria for the evaluation of telecommunications providers to determine which providers have significant market power and price regulations applicable to the wholesale markets for trunk lines, backhaul, access to internet backboneproducts, including EILD services, passive pipeline and subduct infrastructure, fixed line interconnection services, mobile interconnection services, roaming, high-speed data, and regulations relatedinfrastructure for data transmitted through copper wires at speeds of 12 Mbps or less. The evaluation framework also takes into account the providers’ market position in several retail markets in which we participate. Under this framework, municipalities are categorized according to partial unbundling and/or full unbundlingdegree of competition present: competitive, moderately competitive, potentially competitive and not competitive. ANATEL then regulates companies based on the local fixed-line networksdegree of the public regime service providers.competition present in each municipality.

The General Plan on Competition TargetsPGMC imposes stricter restrictions on providers that are deemed to have significant market power in a particular geographic area, ranging from a neighborhood within a municipality to the entire national territory. In order to determine whether a provider has significant market power, ANATEL established criteria that consider:

 

that provider’s market share in particular mobile interconnectionthe retail market and the wholesale markets and personal mobile servicesrelated to the retail market;

 

the economies of scope and scale available to that provider;

 

that provider’s dominance over infrastructure that is not economically viable to duplicate; and

 

that provider’s concurrent operations in the wholesale and retail markets.

As of the date of this annual report, Oi is considered to be a service provider with significant market power in most of the cities in Brazil, except in the mobile interconnection market, where Oi has significant market power only in Region I.

Infrastructure Sharing

Prior to the adoption of the General Plan on Competition Targets,PGMC, ANATEL had established rules for partial unbundling of the local fixed-line networks of the public regime service providers, which we refer to as “line sharing,” and which (1) limited the rates service providers can charge for line sharing, and (2) addressed related

matters such asco-location space requirements.Co-location means that a service provider requesting unbundling may place its switching equipment in or near the local exchange of the service provider whose network the requesting service provider wishes to use and may connect to the network at this local exchange.

The General Plan on Competition TargetsPGMC requires public regime service providers that have significant market power, such as our company, to share their fixed-line network infrastructure with other providers, including their local fixed-line access networks. Providers that are deemed to have significant market power must offer (1) full unbundlingshare their fixed access network infrastructure for transmission of theirdata through copper wire or coaxial cable access networks, and (2) partial unbundling of their broadband networks to accommodate bitstreamswires at transmission rates of up to 1012 Mbps. The methodology by which the wholesale prices for these services will be determined will be established by ANATEL. We expect that ANATEL will commence a public consultation process with respect thereto during the second half of 2016.

Providers with significant market power must also share their passive infrastructure such as telecommunications towers, with other service providers at prices determined by bilateral negotiations between the providers.

In addition, infrastructure sharing is governed by the Regulation of Infrastructure Sharing (Interconnection Regulations ApplicableRegulamento de Compartilhamento de Infraestrutura), which requires that all owners of infrastructure (who may or may not be telecommunications service providers) share their excess capacity with telecommunications service providers.

Ownership and Corporate Governance Restrictions

Over the years, ANATEL has initiated several internal proceedings to Personal Mobile Services Providers

The Generalmonitor our financial situation and to evaluate our ability to continue to perform our obligations under our concession agreements. In light of the approval of the RJ Plan by the creditors on Competition Targets established regulations forDecember 20, 2017, and its subsequent ratification and confirmation by the rates charged by mobile service providersRJ Court, ANATEL began to terminate calls on their mobile networks (the VU-M rate). The General Plan on Competition Targets established a reference value for VU-M rates of providers that are deemed to hold significant market powermonitor our operating and determined that beginning in 2016, VU-M rates will be determinedfinancial positions based on the basis of costs. In July 2014, ANATEL approved a rule for the definition of maximum VU-M reference rates for entities with significant market power, such as our company, based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Under this rule, VU-M reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2019 when VU-M reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply.

The General Plan on Competition Targets established that the VU-M would be paid only when the traffic out of a network in a given direction was greater than (1) 80%effectiveness of the total traffic exchanged until February 23, 2015, and (2) 60% of the total traffic exchanged from February 24, 2015 to February 23, 2016. After February 24, 2016, each mobile service provider would be entitled to collect the VU-M on all calls for which its network was used to originate or terminate the call.

RJ Plan. In February 2015, ANATEL revised the General Plan on Competition Targets regulation relating to the VU-M applicable to the relationship between companies with significant market power and companies without significant market power. Under the revised regulations, the dates and percentages applicable to the VU-M partial bill-and-keep system were revised so that the VU-M will be paid only when the traffic out of a network in a given direction is greater than:

75% of the total traffic exchanged until February 23, 2016;

65% of the total traffic exchanged until February 23, 2017;

55% of the total traffic exchanged until February 23, 2018; and

50% of the total traffic exchanged until February 23, 2019.

The full billing system is scheduled to come into effect on February 24, 2019.

Roaming

Under the General Plan on Competition Targets, a mobile service provider with significant market power, such as our company, must offer roaming services to other mobile providers without significant market power at the maximum rate that the mobile service provider with significant market power is permitting ANATEL to offer such services to its retail customers.

Regulation of Mobile Services

In September 2000, ANATEL adopted regulations that established operating rules for providers under the personal mobile service (Serviço Móvel Pessoal) regime. The regulations permitted ANATEL to grant authorizations to provide mobile telecommunications services under the personal mobile service regime. For purposes of the personal mobile service regulations, Brazil is divided into three service regions covering the same geographic areas as the concessions for fixed-line telecommunications services.

Auction of 3G Spectrum

In preparation for auctions of spectrum in Bands F, G, I and J (2.1 GHz), the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 3G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divide the Brazilian territory into nine regions for purposes of operations using these frequency bands. In December 2007, ANATEL auctioned radio frequency licenses to operate on each of these frequency bands in each of the nine regions and the related licenses to use these frequency bands. In this auction, we acquired the radio frequency licenses necessary to offer 3G services in two of the nine regions delineated by ANATEL for 3G services (corresponding to Regions II under the personal mobile services regime) and TNL PCS acquired radio frequency licenses necessary to offer 3G services in six of the nine regions delineated by ANATEL for 3G services (corresponding to Regions I and III under the personal mobile services regime, other than an area that consists of 23 municipalities in the interior of the State of São Paulo that includes the city of Franca and surrounding areas).

Authorizations to Use 450MHz Band and 2.5 GHz Band

In preparation for auctions of the 450MHz band and 2.5 GHz band, the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 4G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divided the Brazilian territory into three regions for purposes of providing personal mobile services. In June 2012, ANATEL auctioned radio frequency licenses to operate and the related licenses to use the frequency bands in the following manner: (1) four national lots for 2.5 GHz bands, each accompanied by a regional band of 450 MHz, and (2) 132 regional lots for 2.5GHz bands. In this auction, we acquired (1) one of the national lots for 2.5 GHz and the corresponding regional lot of 450MHz to provide rural broadband services in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District, and (2) 11 regional lots for 2.5 GHz bands to provide personal mobile services in the following areas: interior of Ceará, the capital or Roraima(and its metropolitan area), the State of Amapá, the capital of Bahia (and its metropolitan area), interior of the Pará, the capital of Pernambuco (and its metropolitan area), interior of Paraná, the capital of Rio Grande do Sul (and its metropolitan area), the City of Jaguarão (and its metropolitan area) and the capital of São Paulo (and its metropolitan area). ANATEL is currently reviewing whether the obligations that should have been met by the end of 2015, as set out in the auction for the 2.5 GHz and 450 MHz frequencies have been met. In December 2015, ANATEL and CADE approved the RAN Sharing Agreement between Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Oi for the construction, implementation and mutual assignment of network tools to support personal mobile services (voice and broadband) in the 2.5 GHz band, among others, in order to ensure compliance with the scope of commitments between 2015 and 2017 and the expansion of 4G coverage in municipalities with a population over 30,000. ANATEL rejected the proposal to conduct RAN sharing in conurbations, however, because it detected interference in the service. As a result, ANATEL will not allow RAN sharing in municipalities experiencing interference until a solution has been found.

Obligations of Personal Mobile Services Providers

As a telecommunications service provider, we are subject to requirements concerning network expansion and quality of service, as established in applicable regulations and in our personal mobile services authorizations. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined, subject to a maximum penalty of R$50 million, until we are in full compliance with our obligations. While it is possible for an authorization to be revoked for non-compliance with these obligations, there are no precedents for such a revocation.

Quality of Service Obligations

Our personal mobile services authorizations impose obligations on us to meet quality of service standards relating to our network’s ability to make and receive calls, call failure rates, capacity to handle peak periods, failed interconnection of calls and customer complaints. ANATEL defines this quality of service standards, and we must report informationaddition, in connection with such standardsthe RJ Proceedings, ANATEL gained expanded powers regarding our ownership and corporate governance decisions. In March 2019, ANATEL determined it would continue to ANATEL.

To restructure the process of assessing the quality of mobile service,monitor us in 2019, and imposed measures related to transparency, corporate governance, and financial performance. In February 2020, ANATEL informed us that it would suspend its monitoring activities with the inclusion of new processes and measurement of new indicators to check the quality of mobile broadband and the quality perceived by the user, and the modernization of existing indicators, ANATEL approved the Regulation for the Management of Quality of Provision of Personal Mobile Service (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade da Prestação de Serviço Móvel Pessoal), or SMP-RGQ. The SMP-RGQ provides for the assessment of the network connection and their respective data transmission rate, assessing aspects of availability, stability and connection speed for the data network. Targets are defined as 80% of speed hired (on average per month) by users and 40% of the instant speed, accordingrespect to the definitions of the Resolution 575/2011.

Interconnection Regulations

Under the General Telecommunications Law, allRJ Plan, and we are working with ANATEL to formally end this extraordinary supervision. As it does with every telecommunications service providers are required, if technically feasible,services provider whose services it regulates, ANATEL continues to make their networks available for interconnection on a non-discriminatory basis whenever a request is made by another telecommunications service provider. Interconnection permits a call originated on the network of a requesting fixed-line or personal mobile services provider’s networkmonitor us, including our ability to be terminated on the fixed-line or personal mobile services network of the other provider. ANATEL has adopted General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão) to implement these requirements.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Fixed-Line Providers

Interconnection fees are charged at a rate per minute of use of a fixed-line provider’s network. Interconnection rates charged by a fixed-line provider to terminate a call on its local network (the TU-RL rate) or intercity network (the TU-RIU rate) are subject to a price cap established by ANATEL. The price cap for interconnection rates varies from service provider to service provider based on the retail prices of each service provider.

Fixed-line service providers must offer the same TU-RL and TU-RIU rates to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis. The price caps on interconnection rates are adjusted annually by ANATEL at the same time that rates for local and long-distance calls are adjusted.

Under ANATEL regulations, fixed-line service providers are not able to charge other fixed-line service providers for local fixed-line calls originating on their local fixed-line networks and terminating on the other provider’s local fixed-line networks.

In August 2012, the TU-RIU rates were reduced to 25% of the applicable domestic fixed line rates for calls with more than 300 km, and in January 2013, TU-RIU rates were reduced to 20% of the applicable domestic fixed line rates for such calls.

In July 2014, ANATEL approved a rule for the definition of maximum fixed reference rates, including TU-RL and TU-RIU, for entities with significant market power, such asperform our company, based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Under this rule, TU-RL and TU-RIU reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2019 when TU-RL and TU-RIU reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Personal Mobile Services Providers

Interconnection fees are charged at a flat rate per minute of use of a personal mobile services provider’s network. The terms and conditions of interconnectionobligations under our concession agreements, of all personal mobile services providers, including the rates charged by the operator of the network to terminate a call on its mobile network (the VU-M rate), commercial conditions and technical issues, are freely negotiated between mobile and fixed-line telecommunications

service providers, subject to compliance with regulations established by ANATEL relating to traffic capacity and interconnection infrastructure that must be made available to requesting providers, among other things.

Personal mobile services providers must offer the same VU-M rate to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis. Interconnection agreements must be approved by ANATEL before they become effective and they may be rejected if they are contrary to the principles of free competition and the applicable regulations. If the providers cannot agree upon the terms and conditions of interconnection agreements, ANATEL may determine terms and conditions by arbitration. Since no agreement with fixed-line service providers could be reached regarding VU-M rates when we began offering personal mobile services, ANATEL set the initial VU-M rates.

Personal mobile services providers negotiate annual rate increases for their VU-M charges with the fixed-line telecommunications providers. If the providers cannot agree upon the terms and conditions of annual rate increases, ANATEL may determine the annual rate increases by arbitration.

Under ANATEL regulations, in December 2013 ANATEL established the maximum VU-M rate of R$0.33 per minute that is applicable in the event that providers could not agree upon the VU-M applicable in their interconnection agreements. Under the General Plan on Competition Targets, in February 2014 the VU-M rate was reduced to 75% of the maximum VU-M rate established by ANATEL in December 2013, and in February 2015 the VU-M rate was reduced to 50% of the maximum VU-M rate established by ANATEL in December 2013. In July 2014, ANATEL approved a rule for the definition of maximum VU-M reference rates for entities with significant market power, such as our company, based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Under this rule, VU-M reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2019 when VU-M reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply.ordinary course.

Consumer Protection Regulation

In March 2014, ANATEL published a regulation approving the General Regulation on Telecommunications Customers Rights (Regulamento Geral de Direitos do Consumidor de Serviços de Telecomunicações), a single regulation for the telecommunications sector with general rules for customer service, billing, and service offers, which are applicable to fixed, mobile, broadband and Pay-TV customers. This regulation establishes a period ranging from 120 days to 24 months from the date of publication for entering into compliance with the new rules. Most of the new rules that expand the rights of those who use the telecommunications services entered into force on July 8, 2014.

Number Portability Regulations

Number portability is the ability of a customer to move to a new home or office or switch service providers while retaining the same fixed-line or mobile telephone number. ANATEL’s General Regulation of Portability (Regulamento Geral de Portabilidade) establishes general rules regarding portability of fixed-line and mobile telephone numbers. These regulations permit fixed-line customers to retain their telephone numbers if they become customers of a different fixed-line service provider in the same municipality or if they move to a new home or office in the same municipality. Personal mobile services customers are permitted to retain their telephone numbers if they change their service plan or if they become customers of a different personal mobile services provider within the same registration area. Each telecommunications provider has been required to contract a third-party management entity to manage all procedures relating to number portability.

Regulation of Data Transmission and Internet Services

Under Brazilian regulation, ISPs are deemed to be suppliers of value-added services and not telecommunications service providers. Value-added services are considered an activity that adds features to a telecommunications service supported by such value-added services. Telecommunications service providers are permitted to render value-added services through their own networks. In addition, ANATEL regulations require all telecommunications service providers and cable television operators to grant network access to any party interested in providing value-added services, including internet access, on a non-discriminatory basis, unless not technically feasible.

ANATEL has adopted regulations applicable to fixed-line service providers with significant market power. Under these regulations, these providers are required to make the forms of agreements that they use for EILD and SLD services publicly available, including the applicable rates, and are only permitted to offer these services under these forms of agreement. ANATEL publishes reference rates for these services, and if a customer of one of these providers objects to the rates which that provider charges for these services, the customer is entitled to seek to reduce the applicable rate through arbitration before ANATEL.

In May 2014, ANATEL approved a standard for setting maximum values for EILD services based on a long-run incremental cost methodology. Reference rates for EILD services were published containing a single reference table which will be valid from 2016 until 2020. Under this ANATEL regulation, EILD reference rates will decline from 2016 through 2020 when EILD reference rates reflecting the long-run incremental cost methodology will apply. In addition, under the General Plan of Competition Targets, companies with significant market, such as our company, are required to present a public offer every six months including standard commercial conditions, which is subject to approval by ANATEL.

Multimedia Communications Service Quality Management Regulations

In June 2011, the President of Brazil issued Executive Decree No. 7,512/11, which mandated ANATEL to take the necessary regulatory measures to establish quality standards for broadband internet services. In compliance with such decree, on October 31, 2011, ANATEL published a resolution approving the Multimedia Communications Service Quality Management Regulations (Regulamentação de Gestão da Qualidade do Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia), or the Regulations, which identify network quality indicators and establish performance goals for multimedia communications service providers, including broadband internet service providers, with more than 50,000 subscribers. Such providers will be required to collect representative data using dedicated equipment installed at the site of each network connection and be subject to periodic measurements to ensure their compliance with such regulations, including:

individual upload and download speeds of at least 40% of contracted speeds per measurement for at least 95% of all measurements;

average upload and download speeds of at least 80% of contracted speeds for all measurements; and

individual round-trip latencies for fixed-line connections of up to 80 milliseconds per measurement for at least 95% of the measurements.

To increase transparency, customers must be provided with specialized software at no cost to measure their own network quality, although such customer-generated measurements will not be included in official calculations. In addition to ensuring network quality standards, service providers must hire specialized companies to measure customer service and customer satisfaction indicators, including complaint resolution, customer service personnel competence, customer perceptions relating to billing and quality of technical support staff. Service providers must comply with the above-mentioned quality standards beginning on the thirteenth month following implementation of such regulations. Failure to meet such standards will subject non-compliant service providers to sanctions.

National Broadband Plan

On June 30, 2011, we entered into a Term of Commitment (Termo de Compromisso) with ANATEL and the Ministry of Communications to formalize our voluntary commitment to adhere to the terms of the National Broadband Plan, created in May 2010 by Executive Decree No. 7,175/10 with the goal to make broadband access available at low cost, regardless of technology, throughout Brazil. Pursuant to the Term of Commitment, we are required to offer (1) broadband services with minimum upload and download capabilities to retail customers in certain sectors of Region I and II for a maximum price of R$35 per month (or R$29.90 in ICMS-exempt states), plus fees, and (2) access to our broadband infrastructure to certain wholesale customers, including small businesses and municipalities, in certain sectors of Region I and II for a maximum price of R$1,253 per 2 Mbps per month and a one-time installation fee, while observing all quality standards under ANATEL regulations. Both retail and wholesale services are subject to certain network capacity limits and need only be provided at the demand of the

customer. Pursuant to the Term of Commitment, we have offered the required services to all eligible retail and wholesale customers since the date of its execution and have gradually increased the capacities offered to wholesale customers since November 2011. We have been obligated to provide the maximum capacities established by the Term of Commitment to eligible wholesale customers since June 30, 2015. In addition, the Term of Commitment requires that we:

provide one public internet access point for the first 20,000 inhabitants and one additional access point for each subsequent 10,000 inhabitants, with a limit of six access points, at a speed of 2 Mbps, in each municipality that has only satellite service, free of charge and upon demand of such municipality;

adequately advertise the services contemplated by the Term of Commitment and present to the Ministry of Communications semi-annual reports detailing our marketing efforts; and

make our best efforts to offer broadband services to retail customers at speeds of up to 5 Mbps, reaching the largest possible number of municipalities.

The Term of Commitment will expire on December 31, 2016.

Legal Framework for the Use of the Internet (Internet Bill of Rights)

In April 2014, President Dilma Rousseff approved the Legal Framework for the Use of the Internet (Marco Civil da Internet), or the Internet Framework, which establishes the principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil. The bill sets forth a number of guidelines and rules to be observed by internet and application service providers, such as the protection of privacy, the protection of personal data, the preservation and guarantee of net neutrality, the liability for damages caused by content generated or published by third parties and the storage and disclosure of usage logs. Certain parts of the Internet Framework went into effect on June 23, 2014 and others will become effective on the adoption of implementing regulations.

Under the Internet Framework, a presidential decree will be enacted to regulate the law’s provisions, and enacting specific rules regarding network traffic management techniques. The Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (Comitê Gestor da Internet) and ANATEL will express their opinion on the decree after public hearings. Brazil’s Ministry of Justice has also launched a public debate on the main themes related to this law.

Other Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Agenda 2015-20162019-2020

On June 29, 2015, ANATEL put in public consultation its proposedANATEL’s Regulatory Agenda for the 2015-2016 cycle, and revocation of the General Plan of the Telecommunication Regulatory Update in Brazil (PGR). The agenda contained 33 topics of interest to the sector,2019-2020, which should have final approval or some progress in 2015 and 2016. The listed items include: Civil Rights Framework for Internet, Revision of the Concession Agreement and General Planwas approved on Universal Service Goals, review of the quality management model, review of spectrum management model, review the arrangements and scope of telecommunications services, review of the regulation of the SeAC (Serviço de Acesso Condicionado) and review of regulatory reversible assets.

New Regulatory Framework

On November 23, 2015, the Ministry of Communications opened public consultationMarch 21, 2019, includes a study on the new regulatory framework for telecommunications. The consultation is based on a series of questions under four basic axes: purpose of the public policy, universal policy, public regime versus the private regime700MHz, 2.3GHz, 3.3GHz – 3.4GHz, 3.5GHz and public concession. The Ministry of Communications has extended the deadline for contributions on multiple occasions. In April 2016, the Ministry of Communications issued a decree addressing guidelines26GHz radiofrequencies in preparation for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, which will be implemented by5G spectrum auctions ANATEL through the conclusion of the concession amendments. The guidelines provide for, among other things, the expansion of broadband services (includingexpects to hold in rural regions), the elimination of the reversibility of assets, and an extension of the term of our concessions, which

are currently scheduled to expire in 2025. As a result of the publication of these guidelines, ANATEL requested a further postponement of the review of our concession agreements, which was granted. As a result of this extension, the review of our concession agreements is currently scheduled to occur by December 2016.2020.

Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters in Brazil

As part of ourday-to-day operations, we regularly install ducts for wires and cables and erect towers for transmission antennae. We may be subject to federal, state and/or municipal environmental licensing requirements due to the installation of cables along highways and railroads, over bridges, rivers and marshes and through farms, conservation units and environmental preservation areas, among other places. As of the date of this annual report, we have been required to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in several municipalities with no materialexpected impact on our operations. However, there can be no assurances that other state and municipal environmental agencies will not require us to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in the future or that such a requirement would not have a material adverse effect on the installation costs of our network or on the speed with which we can expand and modernize our network.

We must also comply with environmental legislation regarding the management of solid waste. According to resolutions adopted by the National Environmental Council (Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente), companies responsible for the treatment and final disposal of solid industrial waste, special waste and solid urban waste are subject to environmental licensing. Should the waste not be disposed of in accordance with standards established by environmental legislation, the company generating such waste may be held jointly and severally liable with the company responsible for waste treatment for any damage caused. Also, in all states where we operate, we have implemented management procedures promoting the recycling of batteries, transformers and fluorescent lamps.

In addition, we are subject to ANATEL regulations that impose limits on the levels and frequency of the electromagnetic fields originating from our telecommunications transmissions stations.

We believe that we are in compliance with ANATEL standards as well as with all applicablematerial environmental legislation and regulations. We are currently not involved in any administrative or judicial proceeding involving material liability for environmental damage.

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act. Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports filed with the SEC whether the issuer or any of its affiliates has knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings with the Government of Iran, relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction during the period covered by the annual or quarterly report. Disclosure is required even when the activities were conducted outside the United States bynon-U.S. entities and even when such activities were conducted in compliance with applicable law.

In December 2011, we entered into aWe have roaming agreementagreements with MTN Irancell.Irancell, Mobile Company of Iran and Rightel Communications, each of which is an Iranian mobile phone operator. Pursuant to such roaming agreement,agreements, our customers are able to roam in MTN Irancell’s networkthese mobile phone operators’ networks (outbound roaming) and customers of MTN Irancell, Mobile Company of Iran and Rightel Communications are able to roam in our network (inbound roaming). For outbound roaming, we pay MTN Irancell roaming fees for use of their network by our customers, and for inbound roaming, MTN Irancell pays uswe receive roaming fees for use of our network by its customers.

Our inbound and outbound roaming services with MTN Irancell were launched commercially in October and November 2012, respectively.network. During 2015,2019, we recorded revenues of R$2,5295,019 and expenses of R$2,3832,203 in connection with thisthese roaming agreement.agreements.

We do not maintain any bank accounts in Iran. All payments in connection with our international roaming agreements are effected through our bank accounts in London.

The purpose of all of these agreements is to provide our customers with coverage in areas where we do not own networks. For that purpose, we intend to continue maintaining these agreements.

We also provide telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in Brasilia. WeIn 2019, we recorded gross revenues and net profits of less thanapproximately R$6,00015,700 from these services in 2015.services. As one of the primary providers of telecommunications services in Brasilia, we intend to continue providing such services, as we do to the embassies of many other nations.

 

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152019 and 20142018 and for the three years ended December 31, 2015,2019, which were prepared in accordance with IFRS, and the related notes, and are included in this annual report, as well as with the information presented under the sections entitled “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” and “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Information.”

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in “Forward-Looking“Cautionary Statement with Respect to Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are one of the principal integrated telecommunications service providers in Brazil with approximately 70.053.4 million RGUs as of December 31, 2015.2019. We operate throughout Brazil and offer a range of integrated telecommunications services that include Residential Services, Personal Mobility Services and B2B Services. We are the largest fixed-line and mobile telecommunication services, network usage (interconnection), data transmission services (including broadband access services), Pay-TV (includingtelecommunications company in Brazil in terms of total number of lines in service as part of double-play, triple-play and quadruple-play packages), internet services and other telecommunications services for residential customers, small, medium and large companies and governmental agencies.December 31, 2019 based on our 10.3 million fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2019, with a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas as of that date. We own approximately 363,000the largest fiber optic network in Brazil, with more than 376,000 kilometers of installed fiber optic cable, distributed throughout Brazil. Our Personal Mobility Services business offers mobile telecommunications services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, our mobile network covers areas in which approximately 88.7%94% of the Brazilian population lives and works. According to ANATEL,Based on our 36.8 million mobile subscribers as of December 31, 2015,2019, we had an 18.6%a 16.2% market share of the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market and, as of that date. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we had a 34.7% market share of the Brazilian fixed-line market. As part of our convergence strategy, we offer more than one million Wi-Fi hotspots in public places, such as airports and shopping malls. In 2015,2019, we recorded net operating revenue of R$27,35420,136 million and a net loss of R$9,5729,095 million.

Our results of operations and financial condition have been and will be significantly influenced in future periods by the Oi capital increase, the acquisition of PT PortugalRJ Proceedings and the disposition of PT Portugal.our investment in Africatel. In addition, our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 and our financial condition as of December 31, 20152019 and 20142018 have been influenced, and our future results of operations and financial condition will continue to be influenced, by a variety of factors, including:

 

the evolution of Brazilian GDP, which declinedgrew by an estimated 3.8% in 2015,1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019 and grew by 0.1% in 20141.1 and 2.3% in 2013,1.0% during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which we believe affects demand for our services and, consequently, our net operating revenue;

 

the number of our fixed lines in service, which declined to 14.910.3 million as of December 31, 20152019 from 15.811.8 million as of December 31, 2014 (excluding fixed-line customers2018 and 12.9 million as of our discontinued operations),December 31, 2017, and the percentage of our fixed-line customers that subscribe to our alternative plans which increased to 86.4%86.7% as of December 31, 20152019 from 84.5%85.8% as of December 31, 2014;2018 and 85.4% as of December 31, 2017;

 

the number of our mobile customers, which declined to 48.136.8 million as of December 31, 20152019 from 50.937.7 million as of December 31, 2014 (excluding fixed-line customers of our discontinued operations);

the number of our fixed-line customers that subscribe to our broadband services, which declined to 5.12018 and 39.0 million as of December 31, 2015 from 5.92017;

the number of our broadband customers, which declined to 4.7 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (excluding fixed-line customers of our discontinued operations);

the number of our Pay-TV customers, which remained stable at 1.22019 from 5.4 million as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014 (excluding fixed-line customers5.7 million as of our discontinued operations);December 31, 2017;

 

the number of ourPay-TV customers, which declined to 1.5 million as of December 31, 2019 from 1.6 million as of December 31, 2018 and 1.5 million as of December 31, 2017;

the increased competition in the Brazilian market for telecommunications services, which affects the amount of the discounts that we offer on our service rates and the quantity of services that we offer at promotional rates;

our compliance with our quality of service obligations under the RGQ and our network expansion and modernization obligations under the PGMU and our concession agreements, the amount of the fines assessed against us by ANATEL for alleged failures to meet these obligations and our success in challenging fines that we believe are assessed in error;

  

inflation rates in Brazil, which were 10.6%4.3% during the year ended December 31, 2019 and were 3.7% and 2.7% during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in 2015 and 5.72% in 2014,each case, as measured by the IST, and the resulting adjustments to our regulated rates in Brazil, as well as the effects of inflation on ourreal-denominated debt that is indexed to take into account the effects of inflation or bears interest at rates that are partially adjusted for inflation;

our compliance with our quality of service obligations under the General Plan on Quality Goals and our network expansion and modernization obligations under the General Plan on Universal Service Goals and our concession agreements, the amount of the fines assessed against us by ANATEL for alleged failures to meet these obligations and our success in challenging fines that we believe are assessed in error;

 

  

changes in the exchange rates of thereal against (1) the U.S. dollar, including the 47.0%4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2019, and the 17.1% and 1.5% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2015the years ended December 31, 2018 and the 13.4% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2014, and (2) the Euro, including the 31.7% depreciation of therealagainst the Euro during 2015,2017, respectively, which has affected our financial expenses as a result of exchange variations on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars and Euros, andaffects the cost inreais of a substantial portion of the network equipment that we purchase for our capital expenditure projects, the prices of which are denominated in U.S. dollars or are U.S. dollar-linked;dollar-linked, and which affects our financial expenses as a result of exchange variations on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars; and

 

the level of our outstanding indebtedness, fluctuations in LIBOR and benchmark interest rates in Brazil, principally the CDI rate and the TJLP rate, and fluctuations of the Brazilian Consumer Price Index – CPI, which affects our interest expenses on our floating rate debt.

OurWe expect that our financial condition and liquidity iswill be influenced by a variety of factors, including:

 

our ability to generate cash flows from our operations;

 

prevailing Brazilian and international interest rates, which affect our debt service requirements;

our ability to borrow funds from Brazilian and international financial institutions and to sell our debt securities in the Brazilian securities markets, which is influenced by a number of factors discussed below;

the success of our program to monetize non-core assets;

our capital expenditure requirements, primarily relating to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our data transmission networks, our mobile services networks, our voice transmission networks, our information technology equipment and our telecommunications services infrastructure; and

 

the requirement undersuccess of our program to monetizenon-core assets;

the existing terms of our outstanding indebtedness, which could limit our ability to raise additional funds or require us to take certain actions to manage such indebtedness;

our ability to borrow funds from Brazilian and international financial institutions and to sell our debt and equity securities in the Brazilian Corporation Law and our by-laws that we pay dividends on an annual basis in an amount equal to at least 25% of our adjusted net income, unless our board of directors deems it inconsistent with our financial position.

Oi Capital Increaseinternational securities markets; and Acquisition of PT Portugal

On May 5, 2014, we concluded a capital increase, which we refer to as the Oi capital increase, in which we issued (1) 121,674,063 of our common shares and 280,483,641 of our preferred shares for an aggregate amount of R$8,250 million in cash, and (2) 104,580,393 of our common shares and 172,025,273 of our preferred shares to Pharol in exchange for the contribution by Pharol to our company of all of the shares of its subsidiary PT Portugal. PT Portugal provides a broad range of telecommunications services in Portugal and owned significant interests in telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe in Africa and Timor-Leste in Asia.

Disposition of PT Portugal

On June 2, 2015, we sold all of the share capital of PT Portugal to Altice Portugal for a purchase price equal to the enterprise value of PT Portugal of €6,900 million, subject to adjustments based on the financial debt, cash and working capital of PT Portugal on the closing date, plus an additional earn-out amount of €500 million in the event

that the consolidated revenues of PT Portugal and its subsidiaries (as of the closing date) for any single year between the year ending December 31, 2015 and the year ending December 31, 2019 is equal to or exceeds €2,750 million.

In connection with the closing, Altice Portugal disbursed €5,789 million, of which €869 million was utilized by PT Portugal to prepay outstanding indebtedness in that amount, and €4,920 million were paid to our company in cash. As of December 31, 2015, we had used R$8,682 million of the net cash proceeds of the PT Portugal Disposition for the prepayment of indebtedness of our company, and as of the date of this annual report have used an additional R$5,350 million of these net cash proceeds for the prepayment and repayment of indebtedness of our company. We expect to use the remainder of these net cash proceeds for the repayment of indebtedness of our company.

In anticipation of the PT Portugal Disposition, PT Portugal transferred PTIF, its wholly-owned finance subsidiary, to Oi. As a result of the completion of the PT Portugal Disposition, the indebtedness of PTIF, which had previously been classified as liabilities associated with assets held for sale in our consolidated financial statements, was reclassified as indebtedness of our company. In addition, in connection with the PT Portugal Disposition, PTIF assumed all obligations under PT Portugal’s outstanding 6.25% Notes due 2016.

In addition, PT Portugal transferred to Oi all of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações which holds:

our 75% interest in Africatel, which holds our interests in telecommunications companies in Africa, including telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe; and

 

prevailing Brazilian interest rates, which affect our interests in TPT, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste.debt service requirements.

Proposed Disposition of Africatel

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel. As a result, as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, we recorded the assets and liabilities of Africatel as held-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our income statement due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our results of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when the sale of these assets may be completed.

Financial Presentation and Accounting Policies

Presentation of Financial Statements

We have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152019 and 20142018 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017 have been audited in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Based onthe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, standards.

The RJ Proceedings are aimed at ensuring the continuation of our operating cash flowscompany as a going concern. This continuity was strengthened with the approval of the RJ Plan and, as a result, the borrowings and financing were novated and the impact such operating cash flows have had on our liquidity, in combination withrelated balances were recalculated under the levelterms and conditions of the RJ Plan. The continuity of our indebtednesscompany as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful outcome of the RJ Proceedings and the potential impact ifrealization of other forecasts of our company.

Our company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we cannot satisfy certain financial covenants under our current debt instruments in 2016, our independent registered public accounting firm has included an emphasis paragraph related toemphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the substantial doubt with respectsuccess of the RJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concernconcern. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,797 million, loss for the year then ended was R$9,095 million, and working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities) totaled R$6,157 million. As at December 31, 2018 and after the recognition of the effects of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$22,896 million, profit for the year then ended was R$24,616 million, and working capital totaled R$10,624 million.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been able to quantify any material impacts related toCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our operations and sales, particularly our FTTH network expansion. For more details see “—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in theircompliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we included financial statements prepared under IFRS as part of our annual report on Form20-F, applying IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Reporting Standards,” considering that our consolidated financial statementsprevious primary GAAP was Brazilian GAAP and that January 1, 2009 was the date of transition to IFRS. Consequently, as we are not an IFRS first-time adopter, we have included a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative balance sheet (i.e., as of December 31, 2018) and comparative income statement periods preceding the most recent fiscal year (i.e., for the year ended December 31, 2015. However,2018) in our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplatespresent the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilitieschanges in the normal coursebasis of business.presentation.

Business Segments and Presentation of Segment Financial Data

As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal, we consolidated the results of PT Portugal and its subsidiaries into our financial statements as from May 5, 2014 until our disposition of PT Portugal on June 2, 2015. Following our acquisition of PT Portugal, we implemented a new organizational structure that we believe reflects our business activities and corresponds to our principal services.We use operating segment information for decision-making. We have identified only one operating segment that corresponds to the telecommunications business in Brazil.

The Telecommunications in Brazil segment includes our servicestelecommunications business in Brazil, Africa and Asia, including operations that were reported as part of our Fixed-Line and Data Transmission Services, Mobile Services and Other Services segments in prior periods. Prior to our acquisition of PT Portugal, we accounted for our operations under three segments: Fixed-Line and Data Transmission Services, Mobile Services, and Other Services. As a result of our implementation of our new organizational structure, our three previously existing segments have been combined into our Telecommunications in Brazil segment.

Within our Telecommunications in Brazil segment, our management assesses revenue generation based on customer segmentation into the following categories:

Residential Services, focused on the sale of fixed telephony services, including voice services, broadband, and Pay-TV;

Personal Mobility, focused on the sale of mobile telephony services to post-paid and pre-paid customers that include voice services and data communication services; and

SME and Corporate, which includes corporate solutions offered to our small, medium-sized, and large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions.

Brazil. In addition to the Telecommunicationsour telecommunications business in Brazil, segment, we conduct other businesses that individually or in aggregate do not meet any of the quantitative indicators that would require their disclosure as reportable business segments. These businesses includeare conducted primarily the following companies: Mobile Telecommunications Limited in Namibia, Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, ELTA – Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola,by CST, Directel, and Timor Telecom, which provide fixed and mobile telecommunications services and publish telephone directories in Africa and Asia, and which have been consolidated in our financial statements since May 2014.

We evaluate and manage businessWithin our Telecommunications in Brazil segment, performanceour management assesses revenue generation based on information prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP,customer segmentation into the following categories:

Residential Services, which is focused on the sale of fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), and accordingly,Pay-TV;

Personal Mobility Services, which is focused on the segmentsale of mobile telephony services to postpaid (subscription) and prepaid customers that include voice services and data included in this “Management’s Discussioncommunication services; and Analysis of Financial Condition

B2B Services, which includes corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, and Results of Operations of Oi” section is presented under Brazilian GAAP.large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions and wholesale interconnection and traffic transportation services to other telecommunications providers.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in note 2(c)2 to our audited consolidated financial statements. In preparing our audited consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, we relied onIFRS, our management uses estimates and assumptions derived frombased on historical experience and various other factors, including expected future events, thatwhich we deemedconsider reasonable and relevant. Critical accounting policies are those that are important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of operations and require management’s subjective and complex judgments, estimates and assumptions. The application of these critical accounting policies oftenfrequently requires judgments made by management regarding the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain with respect to our resultsthe outcomes of operationstransactions and the carrying value of our assets and liabilities. Our actual results of operations and financial position may differ from those set forth in our audited consolidated financial statements, if our actual experience differs from management’s assumptions and estimates. In order to provide an understanding of our critical accounting policies, including some of the variables and assumptions underlying the estimates, and the sensitivity of those assumptions and estimates to different parameters and conditions, we set forth below a discussion of our critical accounting policies relating to:

 

revenue recognition and trade receivables;

 

provision for doubtful accounts;

expected losses on trade receivables;

 

depreciation of property, plant and equipment;

 

impairment of long-lived assets;

 

provisions;

leases;

fair value of derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments;liabilities;

 

provisions for contingencies;

fair value ofheld-for-sale investments;

deferred income taxes and social contribution; and

 

employee benefits.

defined postretirement benefit plans.

Revenue Recognition and Trade Receivables

Our revenues correspond primarily to the amount of the payments received or receivable from sales of services in the regular course of our activities and our subsidiaries’ activities.

Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

Our revenue recognition considers the judgments that significantly affect the determined amount and the recognition timing of the revenue from a contract with a customer, taking into account the five-step recognition model: (i) identify the contract; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Service revenue is recognized when services are provided. Local and long distancelong-distance calls are charged based on time measurement according to the legislation in effect. The services charged based on monthly fixed amounts are calculated and recorded on a straight-line basis. Prepaid services are recognized as unearned revenues and recognized in revenue as these services are used by customers.

Revenue from sales of handsets and accessories is recognized when these items are delivered and accepted by the customers. Discounts on services provided and sales of cell phones and accessories are taken into consideration in the recognition of the related revenue. Revenues involving transactions with multiple elementsperformance obligations are identified in relation to each one of their components, and the recognition criteria are applied on an individual basis. RevenueVariable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained to revenue recognition until it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not recognized when there is significant uncertainty as to its realization.occur.

Our revenue is a material component of our results of operations. Management’s determination of price, collectability and the rights to receive certain revenues for the use of our network are based on judgments regarding the nature of the fee charged for services rendered, the price for certain services delivered and the collectability of those revenues. Should changes in conditions cause management to conclude that these criteria are not met for certain transactions, the amount of accounts receivable could be adversely affected. In addition, for certain categories of revenue we rely upon revenue recognition measurement guidelines set by ANATEL.

We consider revenue recognition to be a critical accounting policy, because of the uncertainties caused by different factors such as the complex information technology required, high volume of transactions, risk of fraud and piracy, accounting regulations, management’s determination of collectability and uncertainties regarding our right to receive certain revenues (mainly revenues for use of our network). Significant changes in these factors could cause us to fail to recognize revenues or to recognize revenues that we may not be able to realize in the future, despite our internal controls and procedures. We have not identified any significant need to change our revenue recognition policy.

Provision for Doubtful AccountsExpected Losses on Trade Receivables

Our provision for doubtful accounts isexpected losses on trade receivables are established in order to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable and takestake into account limitations we impose to restrict the provision of services to customers withpast-due accounts and actions we take to collect delinquent accounts. The expected losses on trade receivables estimate is recognized in an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses on the realization of these receivables. The expected losses on trade receivables estimate is prepared based on historical default rates. During 2018, we reassessed the methodology used to evaluate the assumption of expected losses on trade receivables that is set up to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers. For additional information regarding our provision for doubtful accounts,expected losses on trade receivables, see note 89 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

We have entered into agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due accounts receivable, including agreements allowing customers to settle their delinquent accounts in installments. The amounts that we actually fail to collect in respect of these accounts may differ from the amount of the allowance established, and additional allowances may be required.

Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment

We depreciate property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method at rates we judge compatible with the useful lives of the underlying assets. The average depreciation rates of each of our most significantclasses of assets are presented in note 1416 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The useful lives of assets in certain categories may vary based on

whether they are used primarily to provide fixed-line or mobile services. We review the estimated useful lives of the assets taking into consideration technical obsolescence and a valuation by outside experts.

Given the complex nature of our property, plant and equipment, the estimates of useful lives require considerable judgment and are inherently uncertain, due to rapidly changing technology and industry practices, which could cause early obsolescence of our property, plant and equipment. If we materially change our assumptions of useful lives and if external market conditions require us to determine the possible obsolescence of our property, plant and equipment, our depreciation expense, obsolescencewrite-off and consequently net book value of our property, plant and equipment could be materially different.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization,amortization. These assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, we first compare the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated byvalue in use of that asset or asset group to its carrying amount.recoverable value. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis,exceeds the value in use of that asset or asset group, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds its fairrecoverable value. FairThe calculation of value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market valuesin use and third-party independent appraisals,recoverable value of assets or asset groups requires the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as deemed necessary.economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold our company to the market. The use of different assumptions may significantly change our financial statements.

We have not recorded anyDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, we performed an impairment test on ournon-current assets under IAS 36 and recognized an impairment provision of R$2,111 million primarily as a result of (1) the revision of our long-lived assets duringstrategic plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that is designed to maximize the threeCompany’s value in the context of our judicial reorganization; and (2) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the residential market, which accelerated the decline in the revenues from fixed-line services and DTH services.

During the years ended December 31, 2015.2018 and 2017, we performed impairment tests on ournon-current assets under IAS 36. We recorded an impairment provision of R$292 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 consisting of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives. We recorded a reversal of impairment provision of R$4,747 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consisting of the partial reversal of impairment losses related to the expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives due to the scenarios and financial indicators taken into consideration in the cash flows from the RJ Plan.

Leases

We recognize aright-of-use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet with respect to leased assets. Theright-of-use asset is measured at cost, which consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, any initial direct costs incurred by us, an estimate of any costs to disassemble and remove the asset at the end of the lease, and any lease payments made before the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received), calculated at present value, discounted using the incremental lending rate.

We depreciate theright-of-use assets on a straight-line basis from the commencement of the lease to the termination of the lease. We also assess impairment when there are indicators that an asset might be impaired.

Our assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates used in our calculation of the present value of our leases are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the financial performance of our company. The use of different assumptions to measure the present value of our leases could have a material effect on the estimated present value of theright-of-use asset and of the lease liability in our balance sheet.

Fair Value of Financial Liabilities

Under IFRS 9, our borrowings and financing were substantially modified as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date and therefore derecognized and the modified borrowings and financing were recorded at fair value. We estimated the fair value of each of these financial liabilities based on an internal valuation made of these financial liabilities, which takes into consideration the cash flows under these financial instruments provided for in the RJ Plan, and assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates consistent with the tenor and currency of each of these financial liabilities.

The fair value adjustment recognized on our balance sheet with respect to each financial liability as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of that financial liability and on a monthly basis we record a financial expense in the amount of the amortization in our statement of operations and a corresponding reduction in the fair value adjustment on our balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded gains on adjustments to fair value of our borrowings and financings of R$13,928 million and gains on adjustments to present value of our trade payables (including trade payables toANATEL-AGU) of R$1,167 million. We do not expect to record additional significant fair value adjustments in our statements of operations.

Our assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates used in our calculation of the fair value of our financial liabilities are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the financial performance of our company. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value of our financial liabilities could have a material effect on the estimated fair value of these financial liabilities and the amounts recorded as borrowings and financings in our balance sheet, as well as the amounts recognized as profit or loss in our statement of operations.

Provisions for Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessment, litigation, fines and penalties are recorded when it is probable that the liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated, based on the opinion of management and itsin-house and outside legal counsel. The amounts are recognized based on the cost of the expected outcome of ongoing lawsuits.

We classify our risk of loss in legal proceedings as remote, possible or probable. Provisions recorded in our audited consolidated financial statements in connection with these proceedings reflect reasonably estimated losses at the relevant date as determined by our management after consultation with our general counsel and the outside legal counsel. Depending on the nature of the contingency, our management uses the statistical measurement or the individual measurement methodology to calculate provisions for contingencies. In any of these methodologies, we use a set of assumptions, information, an internal and external risk assessment, and statistical models that management considers to be appropriate, including the successful implementation of the RJ Plan.

As discussed in note 2024 to our audited consolidated financial statements, we record as a liability our estimate of the costs of resolution of such claims, when we consider our losses probable. We continually evaluate the provisions based on changes in relevant facts, circumstances and events, such as judicial decisions, that may impact the estimates, which could have a material impact on our results of operations and shareholders’ equity. While management believes that the current provision is adequate, it is possible that our assumptions used to estimate the provision and, therefore, our estimates of loss in respect of any given contingency will change in the future based on changes in the relevant situation. This may therefore result in changes in future provisioning for legal claims. For more information regarding material pending claims against our company, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and note 2024 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Derivative Financial InstrumentsHeld-for-Sale Investments

Ourheld-for-sale assets represent the indirect interest held by PT Ventures in the dividends receivable and Other Financial Instruments

We recognize derivative financial instruments atthe fair value based on future cash flow estimates associated with each instrument contracted. Theof our financial assets available for sale related to our investment in Unitel, have been valuedboth classified asheld-for-sale. The assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially at fair value according to the operating assets used as basis in the valuation related to the Oi capital increase. Our estimates of future cash flows may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in the current market. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value could have a material effect on the amounts obtained and not necessarily be indicative of the cash amounts that we would receive or pay to settle such transactions.investment for sale. We sold 100% of our interest in PT Ventures on January 24, 2020.

Deferred Income Taxes and Social Contribution

Income taxes in Brazil are calculated and paid on a legal entity basis, and there are no consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, we only recognize deferred tax assets, related to tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences, if it is likely that they will be realized on a legal entity basis.

We recognize and settle taxes on income based on the results of operations determined in accordance with the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, taking into consideration the provisions of Brazilian tax law, which are materially different from the amounts calculated for U.S. GAAPIFRS purposes. Under U.S. GAAP,IFRS, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on thefor temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the taxable bases of the assets and liabilities.liabilities, and tax loss carryforwards are recorded in assets or liabilities, as applicable. We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

We regularly test deferred tax assets for impairment and recognize a provision for impairment losses when it is probable that these assets may not be realized, based on the history of taxable income, the projection of future taxable income, and the time estimated for the reversal of existing temporary differences. These projections require the use of estimates and assumptions. In order to project future taxable income, we need to estimate future taxable revenues and deductible expenses, which are subject to a variety of external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold by our company. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in the recognition of a provision for impairment losses for the entire or a significant portion of the deferred tax assets.

Employee BenefitsDefined Postretirement Benefit Plans

We sponsor certain defined postretirement benefit plans for our employees. We record liabilities for employeedefined postretirement benefits plan based on actuarial valuations which are calculated based on assumptions and estimates regarding discount rates, investment returns, inflation rates for future periods, mortality indices and projected employment levels relating to pension fundpostretirement benefit liabilities. The accuracy of these assumptions and estimates will determine whether we have created sufficient reserves for the costs of accumulated pensions and healthcaredefined postretirement benefits plans, and the amount we are required to disburse each year to fund pension benefits.postretirement benefits plans. These assumptions and estimates are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, social indicators, our capacity to create new jobs and our ability to retain our employees. All of these assumptions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period. If these assumptions and estimates are not accurate, we may be required to revise our reserves for pensiondefined postretirement benefits, which could materially impact our results of operations.

Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Effects of the RJ Proceedings and Our Declining LiquidityFinancial Restructuring

AsIn June 2016, as a result of December 31, 2015,several factors affecting our consolidated cashliquidity, we anticipated that we would no longer be able to comply with our payment obligations under our borrowings and cash equivalentsfinancing transactions and short-term cash investments amountedwe concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to R$16,700 million. We expectpreserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to useour customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalentsequivalents.

Our liquidity crisis resulted principally from:

the deterioration of the Brazilian economy, which suffered low or negative GDP growth for several years and increased levels of unemployment, with negative effects on (1) our ability to retract and retain customers, and corresponding negative effects on our net operating revenue, and (2) due to increases in Brazilian interest rates and the value of thereal, and corresponding negative effects on our financing expenses;

the increasingly marginal (or in some instances, negative) returns that we achieved through network expansion designed to meet the universalization requirements imposed on our company as a fixed line concessionaire under the PGMU, which require us to make large capital expenditures in certain areas of Brazil that are remote, have low demographic density and short-term cash investments,have alow-income population, without the corresponding ability to recoup these capital expenditures through the rates that we charge customers in these areas or elsewhere;

the change in consumption patterns of Brazilian consumers of telecommunication services as a result of the increasing attractiveness of mobile telecommunications, particularly following the global introduction of the “smartphone,” which has led to continuous sequential declines in the number of subscribers to our fixed-line services, with corresponding negative effects on our net operating revenue;

the requirement under Brazilian law that we make judicial deposits in connection with our defense of labor, tax, and financingcivil lawsuits and regulatory claims brought against our company, which resulted in a significant amount of our liquid assets being diverted into judicial deposits, with the result that these assets were not available for which we have commitments under facilities from CDBus to use for our capital expenditure and BNB, to fund our operations, investments, debt service obligationsrequirements;

the imposition of large administrative fines and workingpenalties, including interest on unpaid charges and late fees, by ANATEL, which resulted in a significant amount of our liquid assets being diverted to pay these charges or into judicial deposits as we defend against these regulatory claims, with the result that these assets were not available for us to use for our capital expenditure and debt service requirements; and

the increases in our debt service requirements as we relied on funds obtained from financing transactions in the Brazilian and international markets to expand our data communications network and to implement projects to meet ANATEL’s regulatory requirements market.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. For more information regarding the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

Effects of RJ Proceedings on Our Statement of Operations

Our net operating revenue was negatively affected by the RJ Proceedings primarily as a result of the impact of these proceedings on our ability to attract new corporate customers for our B2B business as these potential customers have been wary of entering into long-term service contracts with us during the period in whichpendency of these proceedings. We do not believe that the RJ Proceedings had a direct impact on our operating cash flows are insufficient to fund these cash requirements.net revenue from other services.

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered intoAs a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc group of holdersresult of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussionsRJ Proceedings, we realized financial income of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

Our financial statements forR$4,873 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 have been prepared assuming that we will continue2017 from the adjustment to present value of the provision for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL as a going concern, based on our cash flow projections. Our projections depend on factors such as attainment of traffic volume targets, customer base, launching of bundled products attractive to customers, service sales prices, foreign exchange fluctuation and the successresult of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize the liquidity and debt profile.

Should one or morerevision of the assumptions underlying ourcalculations of this provision, taking into account the best estimate of future cash flow projections and other forecasts or the outcome of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile not be met, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments, together with our committed financing, may not be sufficient to meet our contractual obligations and commitments during 2016. If we are unable to successfully restructure our debt on terms satisfactory to our company, we may not be able to execute our business plan or meet our obligations. If we become unable to meet our obligations, we may seek the protection of the courts through a judicially supervised reorganization (recuperação judicial) proceeding in Brazil.

Effects of Investment in and Disposal of Portuguese Business of PT Portugal

On May 5, 2014, we concluded the Oi capital increase in which we issued (1) 121,674,063 of our common shares and 280,483,641 of our preferred shares for an aggregate amount of R$8,250 million in cash, and (2) 104,580,393 of our common shares and 172,025,273 of our preferred shares to Pharol in exchange for the contribution by Pharol to our company of all of the shares of its subsidiary PT Portugal. PT Portugal provides a broad range of telecommunications services in Portugal and owned significant interests in telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe in Africa and Timor-Leste in Asia.

On June 2, 2015, we sold all of the share capital of PT Portugal to Altice Portugal for a purchase price equal to the enterprise value of PT Portugal of €6,900 million, subject to adjustmentsoutflows based on the financial debt, cash and working capital of PT Portugal on the closing date, plus an additional earn-out amount of €500 millionpayment methods prescribed in the event that the consolidated revenuesRJ Plan.

Effects of PT Portugal and its subsidiaries (asConfirmation of the closing date) for any single year between the year endingRJ Plan on Our Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet

On December 31, 201519 and the year ending December 31, 2019 is equal20, 2017, a GCM was held to or exceeds €2,750 million.

In connection with the closing, Altice Portugal disbursed €5,789 million, of which €869 million was utilized by PT Portugal to prepay outstanding indebtedness in that amount, and €4,920 million were paid to our company in cash. As of December 31, 2015, we had used R$8,682 millionconsider approval of the net cash proceedsmost recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the PT Portugal Disposition forRJ Plan reflecting amendments to the prepaymentjudicial reorganization plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of indebtedness of our company,this GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and asconfirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the date of this annual report have used an additional R$5,350 million of these net cash proceeds forRJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the prepayment and repayment of indebtedness of our company. We expect to use the remainder of these net cash proceeds for the repayment of indebtedness of our company.

In anticipationOfficial Gazette of the PT Portugal Disposition, PT Portugal transferred Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V., or PTIF,State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its wholly-owned finance subsidiary,terms, is binding on all parties, although still subject to Oi. appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to it.

As a result of the completionapproval and confirmation of the RJ Plan:

we have begun to attract new corporate customers for our B2B business as the concerns of these potential customers regarding the long-term sustainability of our business have receded;

we recorded an adjustment to present value of R$13,290 million related to our prepetition borrowings and financing as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date;

we recorded a gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings of R$11,055 million as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date as a result of the terms of the RJ Plan that provided for the reduction of the amounts owed to holders of claims under the Defaulted Bonds; and

we recorded a reversal of debt issuance cost and accrued interest expenses on our prepetition borrowings and financing of R$5,479 million as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

Effects of Investments in Africatel

At the time of our acquisition of PT Portugal, Disposition, the indebtedness of PTIF, which had previously been classified as liabilities associated with assets held for sale in our consolidated financial statements, was reclassified as indebtedness of our company. In addition, in connection with the PT Portugal Disposition, PTIF assumed all obligations under PT Portugal’s outstanding 6.25% Notes due 2016.

In addition, PT Portugal transferred to Oi allheld indirectly 75% of the outstanding share capital of PT Participações, SGPS, S.A., or PT Participações, which holds:

our 75% interest in Africatel Holding B.V., or Africatel which holdsheld 25% of the outstanding share capital of Unitel. We recognized this investment as aheld-for-sale financial asset recognized at fair value. The fair value of the investment in Unitel of R$4,089 million was determined based on a valuation report of Pharol’s operating assets prepared by Banco Santander in connection with our interests in telecommunications companies in Africa, including telecommunications companies in Angola, Cape Verde, Namibia, and São Tomé and Principe; and

our interests in TPT, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste.

We have accounted for the acquisition of allPT Portugal.

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the shares of PT Portugal bynecessary measures to market our company in exchange for our common shares and preferred shares in the Oi capital increase under the purchase method of accounting asAfricatel. As a result, as of whichDecember 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we have recorded the assets and liabilities of PT PortugalAfricatel, including its investment in Unitel and the accounts receivable relating to declared and unpaid dividends of Unitel, asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our statement of operations due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our balance sheet basedresults of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when the sale of these assets may be completed.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$238 million, primarily as a result of R$404 million loss recorded as a result of our revision of the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We have prepared a purchase price allocation under which we adjusted the carrying values of certain of the assets and liabilities of PT Portugal.

The following table sets forth the adjustments to market value made in the context of the allocation of the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities of PT Portugal.

   Carrying
Value
   Adjustments
to market
value
   Fair Value 
   (in millions ofreais) 

List of residential segment customers

  R$40    R$738    R$778  

List of personal mobile segment customers

   94     1,642     1,736  

List of corporate segment customers

   37     665     701  

Mobile licenses of the operations in Portugal

   1,037     103     1,140  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments of intangible assets to market value

  R$1,208     3,147    R$4,355  

Property, plant and equipment of operations in Portugal

     608    
    

 

 

   

Adjustments to market value before taxes

     3,755    

Effects of taxation

     (1,012  
    

 

 

   

Total adjustments to market value net of taxes

    R$2,743    
    

 

 

   

The following table shows the total acquisition price for, and the goodwill arising on, the acquisition of PT Portugal.

(in millions of
reais)

Equity instruments issued

R$5,710

Fair value of the stake previously held by our company in Portugal Telecom

571

Non-controlling interests

1,478

Less: fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed

(2,816

Goodwill determined on May 5, 2014

R$10,575

As a result of our decision to sell PT Portugal, the revenue and expenses of PT Portugal are presented in our income statement as discontinued operations. In addition, as a result of our decision to sell PT Portugal and its subsidiary Africatel, the assets and liabilities related to PT Portugal and Africatel were classified in our balance sheet as assets held for sale and liabilities of assets held for sale, respectively.

We recorded a loss from discontinued operations for 2014 of R$4,415 million, consisting of a loss from discontinued operations of R$250 million and an allowance for impairment loss at fair value of the PT Portugalcash investment and divesture-related expensesdividends receivable from Unitel, the effects of which were primarily offset by a R$4,164 million.

We recorded net operating revenue165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of discontinued operations of R$5,082 million forthe realagainst the period from our acquisition of PT Portugal on May 5, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Our profit on discontinued operations before financial expenses and taxes was R$390 million, or 7.7% of net operating revenue of discontinued operations. Financial expenses of our discontinued operations were R$694 million and we recorded an income tax and social contribution benefit on our discontinued operations was R$54 million. As a result, the loss for our discontinued operations forU.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2014 was2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a gain onavailable-for-sale financial assets of R$250293 million, or 4.9%primarily as a result of net operating revenuea R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of discontinued operations.

In connectionthereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018 and R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the reclassificationeffects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded losses onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and liabilitiesexchange rate losses related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal.

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT PortugalVentures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and Africatel, we recorded an impairment loss as part of our loss from discontinued operations for 2014Sonangol paid US$699 million in cash on the investmentclosing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Portugal,Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of R$4,164approximately US$659 million resulting from the recognition of this asset at its fair value less expenses to sell. The sale price used to determine the impairment loss allowance corresponds to the unadjusted purchase price of R$22,267 million (€6,900 million) and liabilities on retirement and other benefits assumedin an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Portugal, amounting to R$3,872 million (€1,200 million).

We recorded loss from discontinued operations for 2015 of R$867 million, consisting of comprehensive income transferred to our income statement of R$226 million, principally consisting ofVentures against the cumulative foreign exchange differences related to PT Portugal, and a loss on the sale of PT Portugal and divestiture related expenses of R$625 million.

Our R$625 million loss in connection with the sale of PT Portugal consisted of (1) the derecognized investment cost that includes goodwill arising on the business combination between our company and PT Portugal and selling expenses totaling R$1,308 million, and (2) the R$683 million revenue related to cash proceeds received directly by our company.

Effects of Investment in Rio Forte Commercial Paper and PT Exchange

In preparing the purchase price allocation with respect to our acquisition of PT Portugal, we recognized the write-off of all commercial paper of Rio Forte owned by PT Portugal and PTIF on the date of acquisition and recorded as other assets a right to compensation receivable of R$2,763 million from Pharol, reflecting the face value of this commercial paper.

On July 15 and 17, 2014, Rio Forte defaulted on the commercial paper held by PTIF and PT Portugal. On September 8, 2014, we, TmarPart, Pharol and our subsidiaries PT Portugal and PTIF, entered into the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement. On March 24, 2015, PT Portugal assigned its rights under the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement to PTIF. On March 27, 2015, PT Portugal assigned all of its rights and obligations under the Rio Forte commercial paper that it owned to PTIF. On March 30, 2015, the transactions contemplated by the PT Exchange Agreement were completed through the transfer of Rio Forte commercial paper in the aggregate amount of €897 million to Pharol in exchange for 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares.

As of December 31, 2014, we had the right to compensation from Pharol related to its subscription in the Oi capital increase in the amount of R$2,895 million (equivalent to €897 million) and had an obligation to acquire 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares from Pharol in exchange for this amount under the PT Exchange Agreement, subject to approval by our shareholders at a meeting scheduled for March 26, 2015. Considering that this asset and liability were for the same amount and could be settled with the same entity and at the same time, we stated them on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 on a net basis.

Under the PT Exchange Agreement, on March 30, 2015 we complete the share exchange under which Pharol delivered 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares to PTIF and we delivered Rio Forte securities to Pharol in the total principal amount of R$3,163 million (€897 million).Unitel shareholders.

Rate of Growth of Brazil’s Gross Domestic Product and Demand for Telecommunications Services

As a Brazilian company with a substantial portionsubstantially all of our operations in Brazil, we are affected by economic conditions in Brazil. Brazilian GDP declinedgrew by an estimated 3.8% in 2015, grew1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019, and by 0.1% in1.1% during 2018 and 1.0% during 2017. The slow economic recovery since the second quarter of 2014, and grew by 2.3% in 2013. While we believe that growth in Brazil’s GDP stimulates demand for telecommunications services, we believe that demand for telecommunications services is relatively inelastic in periods of economic stagnation and that the effect on our revenues of low growth or a recession in Brazil would not be material under foreseeable scenarios. However, a substantial and prolonged deterioration of economic conditions in Brazil couldtogether with continued elevated unemployment levels, have a material adverse effect onadversely impacted the number of subscribers to our services and the volume of usage of our services by our subscribers and, as a result, our net operating revenue.

Based on information available from ANATEL, the number of fixed lines in service in Brazil increased from 39.8 million as of December 31, 2005 to 43.6 million as of December 31, 2015, the latest date for which such information has been made available by ANATEL, and the number of mobile subscribers in Brazil increased from 86.2 million as of December 31, 2005 to 257.8 million as of December 31, 2015. Although the demand for

telecommunications services has increased substantially during the past ten years, the tastes and preferences of Brazilian consumers of these services have shifted.

subscribers.During the three-year period ended December 31, 2015,2019, the number of mobile subscribers in Brazil has declined at an average rate of 4.3%2.4% per year, while the number of fixed lines in service in Brazil during the three-year period ended December 31, 20152019 has declined at an average rate of 6.3%7.0% per year. As the incumbent provider of fixed-line services and a provider of mobile services in our service areas, we are both a principal target and a beneficiary of this trend. During the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, the number of our mobile subscribers has decreased at an average rate of 1% per year from 49.2 million at December 31, 2012 to 48 million at December 31, 2015, while the number of our fixed lines in service has declined by an average rate of 6% per year from 18.5 million at December 31, 2012 to 14.9 million at December 31, 2015.

Demand for Our Telecommunications Services

Effects of Investments in Africatel

At the time of our acquisition of PT Portugal, PT Portugal held indirectly 75% of the outstanding share capital of Africatel which held 25% of the outstanding share capital of Unitel. We recognized this investment as aheld-for-sale financial asset recognized at fair value. The fair value of the investment in Unitel of R$4,089 million was determined based on a valuation report of Pharol’s operating assets prepared by Banco Santander in connection with our acquisition of PT Portugal.

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we have recorded the assets and liabilities of Africatel, including its investment in Unitel and the accounts receivable relating to declared and unpaid dividends of Unitel, asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our statement of operations due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our results of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when the sale of these assets may be completed.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$238 million, primarily as a result of R$404 million loss recorded as a result of our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and dividends receivable from Unitel, the effects of which were primarily offset by a R$165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of the realagainst the U.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a gain onavailable-for-sale financial assets of R$293 million, primarily as a result of a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018 and R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded losses onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange rate losses related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal.

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and Sonangol paid US$699 million in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Rate of Growth of Brazil’s Gross Domestic Product and Demand for Our ResidentialTelecommunications Services

BecauseAs a Brazilian company with substantially all of our operations in Brazil, we are affected by economic conditions in Brazil. Brazilian GDP grew by an estimated 1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019, and by 1.1% during 2018 and 1.0% during 2017. The slow economic recovery since the second quarter of 2014, together with continued elevated unemployment levels, have adversely impacted the number of subscribers to our customers terminating their residential services has exceeded new activations betweenand the volume of usage of our services by our subscribers.During the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2015,2019, the number of ourmobile subscribers in Brazil has declined at an average rate of 2.4% per year, while the number of fixed lines in service declined by 19.1%, or 3.5 million,in Brazil during thisthe three-year period according to ANATEL. As part of the Transformation Plan, we are focusing on offering more and higher-value added services to new and existing customers by combining upselling and cross selling initiatives, thereby increasing the ARPU of our Residential Services business. We believe that through our sales of bundles consisting of more than one service, we improve customer profitability and enhance loyalty, while also increasing ARPU and minimizing churn rates. Primarily as a result of these initiatives, the ARPU of our residential services grew by 5.8% to R$79.6 during 2015 from R$75.2 during 2014. We believe that our renewed focus on the sale of bundled services is the principal reason for the increase in the percentage of our customers that subscribe to more than one of our residential services from 61.6% as ofended December 31, 2014 to 63.3% as of December 31, 2015.

We are required under ANATEL regulations and our concession contracts to offer a basic service plan to our residential customers that permits 200 minutes of usage of our fixed-line network to make local calls. We also offer alternative residential plans that include significantly larger numbers of minutes and charge higher monthly fees for these plans. Over the past three years, the percentage of our customers selecting these alternative plans has grown significantly. Subscribers to our alternative residential plans, including our bundled service plans, represented 86.4% of our residential customers as of December 31, 2015 as compared to 82% of our residential customers as of December 31, 2012. We believe that our alternative residential plans contribute to a net increase in our residential services revenue as many subscribers of our alternative residential plans do not use their full monthly allocations of local minutes.

We have sought to combat the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry of substitution of mobile services in place of local fixed-line services by offering a variety of bundled plans that include mobile services, broadband services andOi TV subscriptions to our fixed-line customers. As a result of these service offerings, the monthly disconnections of our fixed lines in service have declined. As of December 31, 2015:

11.7% of our residential customers subscribed for bundled service packages, which accounted for 28.6% of our post-paid mobile subscribers as each fixed-line subscriber may include multiple mobile devices in a bundled plan, a decrease of 0.6% from the 29.2% of subscribers as of December 31, 2014;

51.0% of our residential customers subscribed for broadband services (whether separately or as part of a bundled service plan), an improvement of 3.0% from the 48.0% of subscribers as of December 31, 2014; and

11.7% of our residential customers subscribed for Pay TV services (whether separately or as part of a bundled service plan), an improvement of 0.3% from the 11.4% of subscribers as of December 31, 2014.

The substantial increase in the number of mobile service users in Brazil has also negatively impacted the use of our public telephones. As the incumbent local fixed-line service provider in Region I and Region II, we are required under ANATEL regulations and our concession contracts to meet specified targets with respect to the availability of public telephones throughout our concession area. However, as a larger portion of the population of Region I and Region II uses mobile handsets to make calls when not in proximity to a fixed-line telephone, revenue from the use of our public telephones declined by 85.7% from 2012 to 2015.

Demand for Our Personal Mobility Services

Our customer base for mobility services (including customers in our Personal Mobility Services and SME and Corporate Services)2019 has declined from 49.2 million at December 31, 2012 to 48.1 million at December 31, 2015, according to ANATEL. We believe that the primary reason for the decline in our Personal Mobility customer base is the reduction in the total number of mobile accesses in Brazil, especially in the second half of 2015. We believe this market shift reflects the trend to consolidate mobile use into a single SIM card, following the launch of new all-net plans and the structural market migration from voice to data in response to the offering of more robust data packages. Additionally, in the second half of 2015, operators in the Brazilian telecommunication sector (including our company) implemented a more intensive policy of disconnecting inactive users (access clean up). As a result, operators reduced regulated costs associated with the maintenance of active accesses for devices that do not generate revenue.

The market for mobile services is extremely competitive in each of the regions that we serve. As a result, (1) we incur selling expenses in connection with marketing and sales efforts designed to retain existing mobile customers and attract new mobile customers, and (2) from time to time the discounts that we offer in connection with our promotional activities lead to charges against our gross operating revenue from mobile services. In addition, competitive pressures have in the past required us to introduce service plans under which the monthly and per-minute rates that we charge our mobile customers are lowered, reducing our personal mobility ARPU. During 2015, thean average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business was 12.4%7.0% per month.

Our new service offerings have had strong performances in the first months following their releases in late 2015. As of December 31, 2015,Oi Livre has acquired 6.2 million customers, corresponding to 15.9% of our total pre-paid base. We have also been increasing our market share in the pre-paid segment, with a market share of 21.3% as of December 31, 2015, a 1.7% increase compared to December 31, 2014.

We expect our overall mobile services business to continue to grow in terms of its market share, traffic volumes and revenues from value-added services. However, due to market saturation, the current macroeconomic situation and the trend in SIM card consolidation, we expect future growth in our mobile services business to occur at lower rates than we have historically achieved.

Demand for Our SME and Corporate Services

The number of our customers for SME and Corporate Services has declined from 8.9 million as of December 31, 2012 to 7.2 million as of December 31, 2015. We believe that the primary reason for the decline in our SME and Corporate Services customer base is the declining macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, which has caused many of our SME customers to cease operations. Our corporate customers, while better able to survive the current economic instability, often respond by reducing their economic activity and their spending for telecommunications products and services. In addition, provided that our SME and corporate customers also purchase the core fixed-line and mobile services offered to our Residential and Personal Mobility Services customers, demand for our SME and Corporate Services is subject to some of the same conditions that affect our Residential and Personal Mobility Services, including reductions in interconnection tariffs, which have led to more robust mobile package offerings and driven the traffic migration trend of fixed-to-mobile substitution.year.

Effects of Expansion of Mobile Data Transmission Services

We have authorizations and radio frequency licenses necessary for us to provide 2G, 3G and 4G services throughout Brazil. During 2015, 2014 and 2013, Oi Mobile undertook extensive capital expenditure projects to

install the network equipment necessary to expand our offerings of these services, investing R$1,151 million, R$1,923 million and R$2,241 million, respectively, which has increased in our depreciation expenses. We financed the purchase and installation of our network equipment through loans and vendor financing.

In 2015, our mobile data transmission services, consisting of 2G, 3G and 4G services to mobile handsets and mini-modems, captured approximately 2,857 net disconnections (calculated based on the number of subscribers at the end of a period less the number of subscribers at the beginning of that period). We increased the number of municipalities in which we offered 4G services to 133, covering 51.4% of the urban population of Brazil, as of December 31, 2015 from 45 municipalities, covering 30.6% of the population of Brazil, as of December 31, 2014, and we increased the number of municipalities in which we offered 3G services to 1,288, covering 78.8% of the urban population of Brazil, as of December 31, 2015 from 1,011 as of December 31, 2014. We expect that these services will generate significant additions to our mobile customer base and lead to long-term increases in our revenues and operating income before financial income (expenses) and taxes.

The aggregate cost of our 3G authorizations and radio frequency licenses and our 2G authorizations and radio frequency licenses in Region III was R$3,129 million; we are obligated to pay the remaining balance of R$919 million to ANATEL in installments through 2019. The cost of our 4G authorizations and radio frequency licenses was R$368 million, which has been paid in full.

Under our 3G radio frequency licenses, we are required to meet certain service expansion obligations that will require capital expenditures through 2016. Under our 4G radio frequency licenses, we are required to meet certain service expansion obligations that will require capital expenditures through 2019. If we are unable to fund these capital expenditures through our operating cash flows, or incur additional indebtedness or vendor financing obligations to make these capital expenditures, we may be required to default on our obligations under these licenses, which could result in requirements to provide completion guarantees and administrative proceedings by the respective regulatory bodies, which could result in fines.

Effects of Divestment of Non-Core Assets

Beginning in 2012, we entered into various transactions to monetize non-essential assets and acquire the services related to these assets at more favorable financial terms, with an aim to reduce future capital expenditures and maintenance expenses.

In August 2013, we completed the assignment of the right to use 4,226 fixed-line communications towers that formed part of our infrastructure for commercial operations by companies whose core operations consist of providing transmission tower and radiofrequency management and maintenance services. Upon the completion of these assignments, we received proceeds of approximately R$1,087 million. We have entered into agreements to lease the communications towers from the assignees for 20-year terms (renewable for another 20 years), effective upon completion of the assignments.

In November 2013, we completed the assignment of the right to use 2,113 fixed-line communications towers that formed part of our infrastructure for commercial operations by companies whose core operations consist of providing transmission tower and radiofrequency management and maintenance services. Upon the completion of these assignments, we received proceeds of approximately R$687 million. We have entered into agreements to lease the communications towers from the assignees for 20-year terms (renewable for another 20 years), effective upon completion of the assignments.

In December 2013, we and our subsidiary BrTI sold all of our equity interests in GlobeNet (other than Brasil Telecom de Venezuela S.A.) to BTG Pactual YS Empreendimentos e Participações. On January 17, 2014, the sale was concluded for an aggregate amount of R$1,779 million (based on the U.S. dollar-real exchange rate on January 15, 2014), resulting in a gain of approximately R$1,497 million after deducting the book value of the assets and related costs of approximately R$1,497 million. GlobeNet’s principal assets consist of 22,500 kilometers of fiber optic submarine cables, composed of two rings of protected submarine cables, linking connection points between the United States, Bermuda, Colombia and Brazil. As part of this transaction, GlobeNet will supply guaranteed submarine cable capacity to us and our subsidiaries at a fixed price for a term of 13 years.

In March 2014, we sold all of our equity interests in Caryopoceae, our wholly-owned subsidiary, to SBA Torres Brasil, Ltda. for R$1,525 million. Caryopoceae owned 2,007 mobile telecommunications towers and rooftop antennae used in our mobile services business. Contemporaneously with the sale of this subsidiary, we entered into an operating lease with a 15-year term (renewable for another five years) with Caryopoceae permitting us to continue to use space on these communications towers for our mobile services business.

In December 2014, we sold all of our equity interests in Tupã Torres, our wholly-owned subsidiary, to SBA Torres Brasil, Ltda. for R$1,172 million. Tupã Torres owned 1,641 mobile telecommunications towers and rooftop antennae used in our mobile services business. Contemporaneously with the sale of Tupã Torres, we entered into an operating lease with a 15-year term (renewable for another five years) with Tupã Torres permitting us to continue to use space on these communications towers for our mobile services business.

As a result of these transactions, we have received cash related to these transactions and recorded gains on disposals of these assets of R$2,399 million during 2014 and R$1,497 million during 2013. As a result of these transactions, the amount of property and equipment that we record has been reduced, and consequently we will no longer record depreciation and amortization expenses relating to these assets, nor will we be required to maintain these assets. As a result of our entering lease and other agreements to continue to use these assets in the provision of our services, our expenses and commitments relating to operating leases have increased.

Effects of Investments in Africatel

At the time of our acquisition of PT Portugal, PT Portugal held indirectly 75% of the outstanding share capital of Africatel which held 25% of the outstanding share capital of Unitel. Our management considers this a non-controlling stake in Unitel which does not grant our company significant influence over the financial, operating and strategic policies of Unitel since we do not elect enough members of the board of directors of Unitel to allow us to be involved in the decision-making process of these policies, including decisions on dividend and other distributions, material business relations, appointment of officers or managers, or the provision of key technical information. Accordingly, upon the acquisition of PT Portugal, weWe recognized this investment as an available-for-saleaheld-for-sale financial asset recognized at fair value. The fair value of the investment in Unitel of R$4,089 million was determined based on thea valuation report of Pharol’s operating assets prepared by Banco Santander on the valuation of Pharol’s operating assets that was used as the basis for the valuationin connection with our acquisition of PT Portugal as partPortugal.

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the Oi capital increase using a series of estimates and assumptions, including the cash flows projections for a four-year period, the choice of a growth ratenecessary measures to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of appropriate discount rates.

market our shares in Africatel. As a result, as of our decision to sell Africatel,December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we have recorded the assets and liabilities related toof Africatel, including its investment in Unitel and the accounts receivable relating to declared and unpaid dividends of Unitel, were classifiedasheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our balance sheet asstatement of operations due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our results of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when the sale of these assets held for sale and liabilities of assets held for sale, respectively.may be completed.

As ofDuring the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, we recorded a loss onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$238 million, primarily as a result of R$404 million loss recorded as a result of our updatingrevision of the main assumptions and material estimates used in the fair value measurement of our investment in Unitel, taking into consideration in this assessment possible impacts of actual events related to the investment, notably the lawsuits filed against Unitel and its shareholders in 2015, we determined a fair value of the cash investment and dividends receivable from Unitel, the effects of which were primarily offset by a R$165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of the realagainst the U.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a gain onavailable-for-sale financial assets of R$293 million, primarily as a result of a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018 and R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded losses onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange rate losses related to the depreciation of R$3,436the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal.

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and recognizedSonangol paid US$699 million in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a lossguaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Rate of Growth of Brazil’s Gross Domestic Product and Demand for Telecommunications Services

As a Brazilian company with substantially all of our operations in Brazil, we are affected by economic conditions in Brazil. Brazilian GDP grew by an estimated 1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019, and by 1.1% during 2018 and 1.0% during 2017. The slow economic recovery since the second quarter of 2014, together with continued elevated unemployment levels, have adversely impacted the number of subscribers to our services and the volume of usage of our services by our subscribers.During the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, the number of mobile subscribers in Brazil has declined at an average rate of 2.4% per year, while the number of fixed lines in service in Brazil during the three-year period ended December 31, 2019 has declined at an average rate of 7.0% per year.

Demand for Our Residential Services

The number of our residential fixed lines in service declined by 29.6% to 7.0 million as of December 31, 2019 from 9.9 million as of December 31, 2016. Demand for our Residential Services was negatively affected by a decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court that we must pay ICMS tax on customer subscriptions that do not include allowances and our subsequent inclusion of this tax in customers’ bills in the first half of 2017. We have focused on offering more and higher value-added services to new and existing customers by combining upselling and cross-selling initiatives, thereby increasing the ARPU of our Residential Services business.

We have sought to combat the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry of substitution of mobile services in place of local fixed-line services by offering a variety of bundled plans that include mobile services, broadband services andOi TV subscriptions to our fixed-line customers. We believe that through our sales of bundles consisting of more than one service, we improve customer profitability and enhance loyalty, while also increasing ARPU and minimizing churn rates. In addition, we have been focusing on structural network investments, including the introduction of VDSL technology, in order to offer service plans that include higher broadband speeds.

Demand for Our Personal Mobility Services

Our customer base for mobility services (including customers in our Personal Mobility Services and B2B Services) declined by 12.7% to 36.8 million as of December 31, 2019 from 42.2 million as of December 31, 2016. We believe that the primary reason for the decline in our Personal Mobility Services customer base is the reduction in the total number of mobile accesses in Brazil, reflecting the trend to consolidate mobile use into a single SIM card, following the launch ofall-net plans in response to the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and the structural market migration from voice to data in response to the offering of more robust data packages. Additionally, we have implemented an intensive policy of disconnecting inactive users to reduce regulatory fees that we must make for each active account, which has also contributed to the decline in our Personal Mobility Services customer base. Finally, we believe that the number of our prepaid accounts has significantly declined over this period as a result of the increase in Brazil’s unemployment rate as our net additions of prepaid subscribers are closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate.

The market for mobile services is extremely competitive in each of the regions that we serve. As a result, (1) we incur selling expenses in connection with marketing and sales efforts designed to retain existing mobile customers and attract new mobile customers, and (2) from time to time the discounts that we offer in connection with our promotional activities lead to charges against our gross operating revenue from mobile services. Competitive pressures have required us to introduce service plans under which we offer unlimited voice calls tied to service offerings priced in relation to the amount of data usage offered.

Demand for Our B2B Services

The number of RGUs of our B2B Services has remained stable at 6.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016. We believe that our B2B Services customer base has been negatively impacted by (1) the declining macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, which has caused many of our SME customers to downsize or cease operations, and (2) contractions in the fiscal strength of many of our governmental customers, which has caused them to reduce the scope of their telecommunications expenditures, the effects of which have been offset by the increased use of our SIM cards, networks and solutions by payment industry terminals.

Our corporate customers, while better able to survive the current economic instability, often respond by reducing their economic activity and their spending for telecommunications products and services. In addition, provided that our B2B Services customers also purchase the core fixed-line and mobile services offered to our Residential and Personal Mobility Services customers, demand for our B2B Services is subject to some of the same conditions that affect our Residential and Personal Mobility Services, including reductions in interconnection tariffs, which have led to more robust mobile package offerings and driven the traffic migration trend offixed-to-mobile substitution.

Effects of Expansion of FTTH Capacity

We are engaged in a long-term capital expenditure project to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on GPON technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. This project is one of the principal elements of our strategic plan and is the element designed to turnaround our fixed line business.

Our FTTH network has grown to reach more than 4.6 million homes passed in 82 municipalities as of December 31, 2019 compared to 1.2 million homes passed in 28 municipalities as of December 31, 2018. Subscriptions to our FTTH services have grown to approximately 675,000 homes connected as of December 31, 2019 from approximately 92,000 homes connected as of December 31, 2018. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020 and our goal is to reach 16 million homes passed by the end of 2021.

We expect our FTTH services will generate long-term increases in our residential services revenue as we acquire new broadband customers, increasing the size of our client base, and transition current customers from our copper last-mile network to our FTTH network, allowing us to provide higher-value services, including faster data transmission speeds to our residential broadband customers, increasing the ARPU of these subscribers. We expect that providing these higher-value services to our customers will contribute to our efforts to reduce the pace of decline in our fixed-lines in service and reverse this trend in the long-term.

The marketing and promotion campaigns related to our expanded FTTH services contributed to an increase in our marketing and advertising expenses during 2019 and are expected to remain at elevated levels during theroll-out of this service offering.

The expansion of our FTTH network has been and will continue to be capital intensive. During 2019, we invested R$408 million.3.1 billion in the network equipment and infrastructure necessary to expand our FTTH network, which has increased in our depreciation expenses. We expect that our capital expenditures related to the expansion of our FTTH network will continue at elevated levels throughout 2020 and 2021. We financed the expansion of our FTTH network in 2019 through cash on hand, primarily with the proceeds of our January 2019 capital increase. We expect to continue to finance the expansion of our FTTH network through cash on hand, including with the proceeds of our sale of PT Ventures and the proceeds of Oi Mobile’s debentures, proceeds ofnon-core asset sales and cash flows from operations. Additionally, we expect to accelerate the potential of our FTTH expansion using two franchise models, one in which we partner with an existing ISP with an established brand under which we provide the backbone capacity, the data connectivity, access to our locations andco-hosting of facilities and the ISP provides the last mile connection, and the second in which our support of our partners will be much more important and more akin to a traditional franchise, with many more components of the operations provided by our company, including customer care and the standardization of the portfolio offerings. If we are unable to fund these capital expenditures through our operating cash flows and proceeds ofnon-core asset sales, we may incur additional indebtedness or vendor financing obligations, which would increase our outstanding indebtedness and financial expenses. If these resources are insufficient to fund the continued expansion of our FTTH network, we may be required to scale back this project.

Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic

Since December 2019,COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic.. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other quarantine measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced social isolation and quarantine measures and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared states of emergency. In accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although theCOVID-19 pandemic has no effect on our historical results of operations, there are many potential effects of this pandemic on our short- and medium- term business operations and, consequently, our results of operations. In March 2020, we established a crisis response team to focus on ensuring the full business continuity of our operations, the health and safety of our employees, and the establishment of a formal process to monitor, analyze and respond to the potential impacts of the pandemic. As of the date of this annual report, we have detected few cases ofCOVID-19 in our employees and our human resources department monitors suspected or confirmed cases. As one a measure designed to protect our employees, we have instituted a “work-from-home” policy for all of our employees for whom the demands of their work permit this arrangement, constituting approximately 84% of our work force, and have been able to do so without any interruption of their activities. For our remaining employees, for example, our field service technicians and operators in our call centers, we have complied with all health care recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

The Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic.

Although there has not been sufficient history with our operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to provide significant analysis of the potential financial impact of the pandemic or the governmental and popular response to the pandemic, we note that demand for telecommunications services, including services provided by our company, during the pandemic has grown significantly. In order to service this demand and to ensure continuity of our services, we moved quickly to activate new circuits in our backbone infrastructure and have not experienced any significant decline in the operation and reliability of our networks.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have closed our retail stores and many of our distribution channels for our mobile service have been unable to operate, although some of our physicalpoints-of-sale, such as grocery stores, pharmacies and convenience stores, have continued to operate. As a result, we believe that new activations by mobile customers will be substantially reduced for the duration of these closures. However, as these store closures affect all operators in the mobile business equally, we expect that there will be substantially reduced levels of churn during this period. In addition, we expect that revenue for SIM card recharges will be adversely effected for the duration of these closures as the number ofpoints-of-sale that offer these services has been substantially reduced.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have curtailed significantly ourdoor-to-door sales channel for residential services, including broadband, but have been able to maintain our telemarketing and teleagent sales channels. We have experienced a significant surge in demand for our broadband services, including services delivered through our expanding FTTH network, both from residential and B2B customers as they establish remote work operations. Because our sales channels for these services depend less on physical presence in sales locations than our mobile services, we do not expect the reduction in new activations or upgrades in services to be affected to the same degree as in our mobile services.

We expect that the public health measures adopted in Brazil will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, although we have not yet been able to gather data to analyze the extent of these impacts. In addition, we have begun to experience some delays in payment for our corporate and governmental customers. As a result, we expect an increase in late-payments, customer defaults and expected losses on trade receivables. We have instituted some measures to assist our customers during the pandemic, for example, providing deferrals of payment deadlines by up to 10 days upon request of our customers and entering into payment plans with some of our customers under which we will forbear the collection of interest and late charges. These measures are likely to have an adverse effect on revenue and operating cash flow during the period over which they are effective, although we do not have sufficient experience with the effects of these measures to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures.

We continue to monitor the effects ofCOVID-19 and the public health measures adopted in Brazil on our results of operations and cash flows to assess whether any of our assets have been impaired. As of the date of this annual report, we have do not have sufficient history with our operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to assess whether any impairment of our assets will be required.

We do not expect significant negative effects on our ongoing maintenance activities and FTTH expansion project as a result of the pandemic and the public health measures introduced to combat the pandemic. We have experienced some negative effects relating to the deployment of field teams, primarily related to the difficulty of obtaining lodging and meals and, in some instances, the difficulty in arranging transportation between cities, due to the public health restrictions. However, as a result of the determination that the telecom sector is an essential service, the general public health restrictions applicable to the population have not generally applied to our staff of field technicians.

We continue to have regular communications with our equipment vendors to assess the impacts of the pandemic on their production and inventories to ensure that deliveries of equipment will continue to be made on a timely basis. As of the date of this annual report, we have not suffered any negative impacts in our supply chain for equipment and have not been advised that any significant disruptions are expected.

Effects of Our Absorption of Network Maintenance Service Operations and Adoption of New Customer Care Model

We introduced programs beginning in 2015 to control costs related to network maintenance services and third-party services by (1) absorbing operation of several network maintenance service operations and providing these services ourselves, and (2) implementing a new customer care quality model through which we have improved our method of allocation of call center traffic to promote a greater level of customer service and digitized some of our customer interactions with respect to processing order for new services, troubleshooting service issues and dispatching maintenance personnel.

Through our subsidiary Serede we absorbed operations of our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in Rio de Janeiro in October 2015, our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in the South region of Brazil in May 2016 and our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in the North and Northeast regions of Brazil in June 2016. As a result, 75% of the members of our technical field staff are our employees and are directly managed by our company compared to 20% prior to the absorption of these operations. We have revised the focus of our network maintenance service operations to concentrate on preventive network maintenance the reduce the number of repairs, in turn reducing the volume of network interventions and increasing field force productivity, thus freeing capacity to increase our focus on preventive maintenance. This virtuous cycle improves field operations efficiency and reduces costs in terms of both the number of technicians and the volume of materials applied.

As a result of internalizing these operations, our network maintenance services expense has declined to R$1,014 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$1,104 million during 2018 and R$1,252 million during 2017. In addition to reducing costs, we believe that this initiative has been principally responsible for (1) a reduction of the number of repairs by 19.4% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 17.2% during 2018 and 12.5% during 2017, and (2) an increase in productivity of our field staff (as measured by the number of field activities carried out divided by the total number of technicians involved) by 1.2% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 6.9% during 2018 and 16.5% during 2017. Finally, we believe that this initiative has been principally responsible for (1) the reduction in the average time for installation of new service by 6.8% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 18.9% during 2017 and 30.4% during 2017, (2) the reduction in the average waiting time for resolution of a customer service issue by 7.4% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 3.2% during 2018 and 25.8% during 2017, and (3) a reduction of complaints to ANATEL by 8.6% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 19.6% during 2018 and 23.0% during 2017.

During 2016, we implemented a new customer care quality model in which we allocated call traffic among our call center service providers based on service quality. In addition, in 2018, we began to promote electronic channels that allow self-service, increasing digital interactions and consequently reducing calls requiring interactions with call center personnel. These initiatives have stimulated better quality in the provision of services, resulting in a 6.5% decline in the volume of repeated calls during the year ended December 31, 2019, and 17.3% and 22.8% declines in the volume of repeated calls during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and a 13.3% decline in call center costs during the year ended December 31, 2019, and 22.5% and 8.9% declines in call center costs during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Effects of Adjustments to Our RegulatedInterconnection Rates

Telecommunications services rates are subject to comprehensive regulation by ANATEL. OurIn particular, interconnection rates for local fixed-line services, domestic long-distance services,and mobile services interconnection to our fixed-line network, and EILD and SLD services arein the Brazilian telecommunications industry have been subject to regulation by ANATEL.comprehensive reductions in recent years.

In July 2014, ANATEL approved rules under which interconnection rates charged by our company for the use of our fixed-line and mobile networks would be reduced over a period of years until they were set at rates based on along-run incremental cost methodology. As a result, theThe MTR tariffs that we charged to terminate calls on our mobile interconnection rates for Regions I, IInetworks were reduced by 85.5% from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2019 and III declinedwere reduced by 25% each0.4% in February 2014, 33.3% each2020. In addition, theTU-RL andTU-RIU tariffs that we charged to terminate calls on our fixed-line networks were reduced by 76.2% from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2019 and were reduced by an average of 9.7% in February 2015 and 40.0%, 35.2% and 27.6%, respectively, in February 2016, with additional cuts approved through 2019. In addition, ANATEL approved cuts for most of our fixed interconnection rates ranging from 9.1% and 20.0 in February 2016, with additional cuts approved through 2019. In addition, ANATEL has reduced the substantially reduced our VC Rates during 2013 and 2015, as described

2020.

under the caption “Item 4. Information on the Company—Operations in Brazil—Rates.” These rate reductions have been a primary reason for the decline in our mobile interconnection revenue to R$889257 million during 2015the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$1,399448 million during 20142018 and from R$2,147500 million during 2013,2017, and the decline in our fixed-line interconnection revenue to R$31643 million during 2015the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$35453 million during 20142018 and from R$38871 million during 2013.2017. However, these rate reductions have also led to a substantial reduction of our interconnection costs, which have declined to R$1,809487 million during 2015the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$2,690658 million during 20142018 and R$3,966778 million during 2013. 2017.

As a result of the substantial reductions in our interconnection costs, and in keeping with our strategy of simplifying our portfolios to enhance the customerour customers’ experience, insince 2015 we launched severalhave been offering fixed-line and mobile plans that allowall-net calls for a flat fee.

We are required to obtain ANATEL approval prior to offering new alternative fixed-line or mobile plans. The rates established or approved by ANATEL for our services act as caps on the prices that we charge for these services, and we are permitted to offer these services at a discount from the rates approved by ANATEL. After ANATEL establishes or approves rate caps for these services, these rate caps are subject to annual adjustment based on the rate of inflation, as measured by the IST. Rate caps for local fixed-line plans are adjusted by inflation, as measured by the IST, less an amount that serves as a proxy for productivity gains achieved by our company and the local fixed-line services industry as a whole.

Effects of Claims by ANATEL that Our Company Has Not Fully Complied with Our Quality of Service and Other Obligations

As a fixed-line service provider, we must comply with the provisions of the General Plan on Quality Goals.RGQ. As a public regime service provider, we must comply with the network expansion and modernization obligations under the General Plan on Universal Service GoalsPGMU and our concession agreements. Our personal mobile services authorizations set forth certain network expansion obligations and targets and impose obligations on us to meet quality of service standards. In addition, we must comply with regulations of general applicability promulgated by ANATEL, which generally relate to quality of service measures.

If we fail to meet quality goals established by ANATEL under the General Plan on Quality Goals,RGQ, fail to meet the network expansion and modernization targets established by ANATEL under the General Plan on Universal Service GoalsPGMU and our concession agreements, fail to comply with our obligations under our personal mobile services authorizations or fail to comply with our obligations under other ANATEL regulations, we may be subject to warnings, fines, intervention by ANATEL, temporary suspensions of service or cancellation of our concessions and authorizations.

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the General Plan on Quality GoalsRGQ and the General Plan on Universal Service Goals.PGMU.

At the time that ANATEL notifies us it believes that we have failed to comply with our obligations, we evaluate the claim and, based on our assessment of the probability of loss relating to that claim, may establish a provision. We vigorously contest a substantial number of the assessments made against us.us by ANATEL. As of December 31, 2015,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with all pending administrative proceedings brought by ANATEL against us in which we deemed the risk of loss as probable totaled R$1,149570 million, including fines which we are contesting through judicial proceedings, and we had recorded an aggregate provision related to these proceedings in the same amount. In

Effect of Level of Indebtedness and Interest Rates

As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financings of R$31,642 million, excluding the event that we are unsuccessfulfair value adjustment to our borrowings and financings and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs.

Borrowing and financing costs consist of interest on borrowings payable to third parties, exchange losses on third-party borrowings and gains and losses on derivative financial instruments as set forth in obtaining final approval of the inclusion of the R$5 billion of fines and claims we have proposednote 6 to beour audited consolidated financial statements included in the TAC program, we could be required to constitute an additional provisionthis annual report.

As a result of the portion of these fines and claims for which we have not previously established a provision.

In December 2013, ANATEL approved Resolution No. 629/2013 under which a TAC was adopted permitting telecommunications concessionaires to request that their obligations to pay fines to ANATEL for non-compliance with certain service requirements be satisfied through capital expenditure investments in their networks. Under this

regulation, Oi is currently negotiating several TACs with ANATEL related to fines in an aggregate amount of approximately R$5 billion, which can be classified into four categories of non-compliance: (1) universalization and quality, (2) systemic interruptions and external network, (3) consumer rights and general obligations, and (4) fiscalization.

On January 5, 2016, ANATEL published a decision defining the priority projects in case of TACs executed by any operator and ANATEL. ANATEL will accept projects related to: (1) transport infrastructure based on fiber to the municipal capital; (2) transport infrastructure through high capacity digital radio to the municipal capital; (3) deployment of mobile personal service to provide 3G technology in cities that currently do not have such service; (4) deployment of mobile personal service to provide 4G technology in cities with more than 30,000 inhabitants that currently lack such service; and (5) copper network shortening through FTTC technology in order to provide broadband service. ANATEL also published the factor of regional inequalities to stimulate the implementation of these projectsthe RJ Plan, most of our obligations under our restructured indebtedness accrues interest at fixed-rates in less developed areas.

If we executeU.S. dollars. However, our obligations under our restructured debentures and our restructured Brazilian credit agreements and Real Estate Receivables Certificates (Certificados de Recebíveis Imobiliários), or CRIs, accrue interest based on the CDI rate and our obligations under our restructured credit agreements with BNDES accrue interest based on the TJLP rate. As a TAC with ANATEL, then we will be subject to the terms and conditions set forthresult, increases in the TAC, including any penalties for non-compliance provided therein (in lieuCDI rate or the TJLP rate will increase our interest expenses and debt service obligations.

In addition, the RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities. This debt may accrue interest at floating rates and/or be denominated in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this debt, if incurred.

Effects of those set forthFluctuations in Exchange Rates between the regulations) forReal and the lifeU.S. Dollar

Substantially all of our cost of services and operating expenses in Brazil are incurred inreais. As a result, the appreciation or depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar does not have a material effect on our operating margins. However, the costs of a substantial portion of the TAC. We will be requirednetwork equipment that we purchase for our capital expenditure projects are denominated in U.S. dollars or are U.S. dollar-linked. As a result, depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar results in this network equipment being more costly inreais and leads to comply withincreased depreciation expenses. Conversely, appreciation of the regulatory requirements only uponreal against the expirationU.S. dollar results in this network equipment being less costly inreais and leads to reduced depreciation expenses.

As a result of the relevant TAC.confirmation of the RJ Plan, our obligations under our restructured Export Credit Agreements, our PIK Toggle Notes and ourNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are denominated in U.S. dollars and will accrue interest in U.S. dollars.

During 2015,As a result, when thereal appreciates against the U.S. dollar:

the interest costs on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars will decline inreais, which will positively affect our results of operations inreais;

the amount of our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars will decline inreais, and our total liabilities and debt service obligations inreaiswilldecline; and

our financial expense, net will decline as a result of foreign exchange gains that we recorded provisions relatedrecord.

A depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar will have the converse effects.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to administrative proceedings brought by ANATELDecember 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have adverse effects on the carrying amount of R$44.6 million. Our provisions relatedour U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses and thereal costs of our U.S. dollar-denominated capital expenditure and operating lease costs. In the short-term, we do not believe that this depreciation will have a significant adverse effect on our ability to administrative proceedings brought by ANATEL generally have been sufficient to pay all amounts that we were ultimately required to pay with respect to claims brought by ANATEL.obtain network equipment for our capital expenditure projects.

Effects of Inflation

After several years of relatively modest inflation in Brazil, inflation rates increased substantially during 2015 to annual rates of 10.7% as measured by the IGP-DI and the IBGE. Because substantially all of our cost of services and operating expenses are incurred inreais in Brazil, thisan increase in inflation has the effect of increasing our operating expenses and reducing our margins. Although we have taken significant measures to control and reduce operating expenses during 2015,the past three years, the benefits of these measures have been weakenedwere reduced as a result of the countervailing impact of Brazilian inflation.inflation during that time. Although our regulated rates are subject to annual adjustment based on the rate of inflation as measured by the IST, the majority of our revenue is generated from services delivered at rates that are not regulated or that are provided at a discount to the regulated rates as a result of competitive pressures in the Brazilian telecommunications market. As a result, we may not be able to pass through our increased operating costs and expenses resulting from inflationary pressures through to our customers as incurred in the form of higher tariffs for our services.

A significant portionAs a result of the confirmation of the RJ Plan, ourreal-denominated debt bears obligations under our debentures and restructured Brazilian credit agreements and CRIs have accrued interest at the TJLP orbased on the CDI rate, which are partiallycould be adjusted forin the event of a significant increase in inflation andin Brazil, since the ICPA rate, an inflation index, and, asBrazilian Confirmation Date. As a result, inflation results in increases incould potentially have an indirect impact on our interest expenses and debt service obligations.

Effects of Fluctuations in Exchange Rates between the Real and the U.S. Dollar and the Euro

Substantially all of our cost of services and operating expenses in Brazil are incurred inreais. As a result, the appreciation or depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar does not have a material effect on our operating margins. However, the costs of a substantial portion of the network equipment that we purchase for our capital expenditure projects are denominated in U.S. dollars or are U.S. dollar-linked. This network equipment is recorded on our balance sheet at its cost inreais based on the applicable exchange rate on the date the transfer of ownership, risks and rewards related to the purchased equipment occurs. As a result, depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar results in this network equipment being more costly inreais and leads to increased depreciation expenses. Conversely, appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar results in this network equipment being less costly inreais and leads to reduced depreciation expenses.

Our consolidated indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars and euros represented 38.2% and 40.3%, respectively, of our consolidated outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2015. As a result, when thereal appreciates against the U.S. dollar or the euro:

the interest costs on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars or euros declines inreais, which positively affects our results of operations inreais;

the amount of our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars or euros declines inreais, and our total liabilities and debt service obligations inreaisdecline; and

our net interest expenses tend to decline as a result of foreign exchange gains that we record.

A depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar has the converse effects.

In order to mitigate the effects of foreign exchange variations, we have historically maintained a hedging policy under which our exposure to foreign exchange variations is subject to limits set by our board of directors. Under this policy, we typically entered into derivative transactions to swap the foreign exchange rate variation for variations of the CDI. At December 31, 2015, we had entered into hedging transactions in respect of 99.5% of our consolidated indebtedness affected by exchange rate variations. The purpose of these hedging transactions is to seek to “match” the currency of our debt with that of our revenues to mitigate foreign exchange risk. During 2016, in connection with our consideration of potential plans to restructure our indebtedness, we have not rolled over our non-deliverable forwards and have selectively settled several of our long-term currency swaps. As a result, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations has increased substantially.

Effect of Level of Indebtedness and Interest Rates

At December 31, 2015, our total outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis was R$59,857 million. The level of our indebtedness results in significant interest expenses that are reflected in our income statement. Financial expenses of our continuing operations consist of interest expense, exchange variations of U.S. dollar- and other foreign currency-denominated debt, foreign exchange losses or gains, and other items as set forth in note 6 to our consolidated financial statements. In 2015, we recorded financial expenses of our continuing operations of R$11,903 million on a consolidated basis, of which R$4,050 million consisted primarily of interest expenses on loans and debentures payable to third parties and R$10,908 million consisted of losses from monetary correction and exchange differences on third-party loans and financings. Part of the financial expenses of our continuing operations were offset by income from derivative transactions of R$5,797 million and by exchange rate gains related to cash maintained offshore to provide a natural hedge of R$3,350 million. During 2015, we hedged our foreign currency denominated debt for which we did not have corresponding foreign currency cash deposits against exchange rate fluctuations; as a result, the cost of such indebtedness was linked to fluctuations in the CDI rate rather than the exchange rate. During 2016, in connection with our consideration of potential plans to restructure our indebtedness, we have not rolled over our non-deliverable forwards and have selectively settled several of our long-term currency swaps. As a result, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations has increased substantially.

The interest rates that we pay depend on a variety of factors, including prevailing Brazilian and international interest rates and risk assessments of our company, our industry and the Brazilian economy made by potential lenders to our company, potential purchasers of our debt securities and the rating agencies that assess our company and its debt securities.

Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch maintain ratings of our company and our debt securities. Currently, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch maintain ratings of our company on a local and a global basis. On a global basis, Standard & Poor’s maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “CCC-,” Moody’s maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “Caa1,” and Fitch maintains a foreign currency rating for our company of “CCC.” Any decision by these agencies to downgrade the ratings of our company or of our debt securities in the future would likely result in increased interest and other financial expenses relating to our borrowings and debt securities and the inclusion of financial covenants in the instruments governing new indebtedness, and could significantly reduce our ability to obtain such financing on satisfactory terms or in amounts required by us.

Our export credit facility guaranteed by EKN contained a requirement that we prepay all outstanding amounts in the event that our credit rating was downgraded below Ba2 by Moody’s or BB by Fitch. As a result of the actions

by these rating agencies, we were required to prepay the outstanding principal amount under this export credit agreement of R$202 million in April 2016.

Seasonality

Our primary business operations do not have material seasonal operations, other than our sales of handsets and accessories in our Personal Mobility business which tends to increase during the fourth quarter of each year as compared to the other three fiscal quarters related to significant increases of volume during theyear-end holiday shopping season.

Recent Developments

ExclusivitySale of PT Ventures

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and Sonangol paid US$699 million in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, with LetterOnewe deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Sale of Botafogo Property

On February 21, 2020, we sold our property at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda. for R$120.5 million.

Issuance of Oi Mobile Debentures

In October 2015,February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible secured debentures. These debentures are guaranteed by Oi and Telemar and are secured by a pledge of cash flows from our receivables in an amount up to R$200 million per month and a first-priority lien on our right to use mobile frequencies. These debentures mature in January 2022 in the event that we entered intoraise more than R$5 billion from our divestments by July 31, 2020, and will amortize at a rate of R$100 million per month beginning in August 2020 through January 2022 in the event that we do not achieve this divestment target. These debentures bear PIK interest, capitalized monthly, through January 2021 at a rate of 12.66% per annum based on the daily U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount determined in accordance with the daily exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal, and interest at a rate of 13.61% per annum, payable in cash, thereafter.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and remain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an exclusivity agreementinterest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Administrator must take place within 60 days from the date of submission of the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of our mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with LetterOnevarious constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the negotiation of a potential transaction for the specific purpose of allowing a consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications industry involving a potential business combination with TIM. As part of the potential transaction, LetterOne proposed to make a capital contribution of up to US$4.0 billion in our company, contingent on the completion of the consolidation transaction. On February 25, 2016, we were notified by LetterOne that it had been informed by TIM that the latter was no longer interested in proceeding with the negotiations of a business combination with our company and that without TIM’s involvement, LetterOne could not proceed with transaction as previously planned.

Engagement of PJT Partners

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

Notice of Default under PTIF Bonds

Under the Trust Deed governing the PTIF Bonds, we were required to file audited financial statements of PTIF as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce no later than January 31, 2016. On April 29, 2016, the PTIF Trustee delivered a written notice to PTIF and Oi noting that the failure of PTIF to provide the 2014 audited financial statements constituted a potential event of default under the PTIF Bonds and requesting the delivery of those financial statements. PTIF is continuing to work with its auditor to complete the preparation of its 2014 audited financial statements as soon as possible.

The PTIF Trustee has notified PTIF that if PTIF fails to deliver the financial statements on or prior to May 29, 2016 and the PTIF Trustee determines that this failure is materially prejudicial to the interests of the holders of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee could declare that the PTIF Bonds are immediately due and repayable. Under the terms of the PTIF Bonds,proposed amendment that will be presented to the PTIF Trustee is not obliged to exercise its discretion to declare any PTIF Bonds immediately due and repayable or to take any other action to enforce the rights of the holders of the PTIF Bonds unless it shall have been indemnified to its satisfaction and specifically directed or requested to do so by a requisite percentage of the holders of the PTIF Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PTIF Bonds.RJ Court.

Results of Operations

The following discussion of our results of operations is based on our audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP.IFRS. In the following discussion, references to increases or decreases in any period are made by comparison with the corresponding prior period, except as the context otherwise indicates.

Year Ended December 31, 20152019 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 20142018

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated income statement, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 20152019 and 2014.2018.

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   % Change   Year ended December 31, 
  (in millions ofreais, except percentages)   2019   2018   %
Change
 
  (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Net operating revenue

  R$27,354    R$28,247     (3.2   R$20,136    R$22,060    (8.7) 

Cost of sales and services

   (16,250   (16,257   —       (15,315)    (16,179)    (5.3) 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

Gross profit

   11,104     11,990     (7.4   4,821    5,881    (18.0) 

Operating income (expenses)

            

Selling expenses

   (4,720   (5,566   (15.2   (3,548)    (3,853)    (7.9) 

General and administrative expenses

   (3,912   (3,835   2.0     (2,782)    (2,739)    1.6 

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,259   2,024     (162.2   (1,469)    (4,557)    (67.8) 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

Operating income (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

   1,213     4,613     (73.7

Financial income

   5,365     1,345     298.9  

Financial expenses

   (11,903   (5,894   102.0  

Operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977)    (5,268)    (43.5) 

Financial income (expenses), net

   (6,110)    26,609    (123.0) 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

Financial expenses, net

   (6,538   (4,549   43.7  
  

 

   

 

   

Income (loss) before taxes

   (5,325   64     n.m.  

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (9,087)    21,341    (142.6) 

Income tax and social contribution

   (3,380   (758   345.7     (8)    3,275    (100.2) 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (8,705   (694   n.m.  

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (867   (4,086   (78.8

Profit (loss)

   R$(9,095)    R$24,616    (136.9) 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,572  R$(4,780   100.2  
  

 

   

 

   

n.m.Not meaningful.

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 20152019 and 2014.2018.

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

      

Residential

  R$9,779    R$9,995     (2.2

Personal mobility

   8,431     9,011     (6.4

SME/Corporate

   7,974     8,312     (4.1

Other services

   257     295     (12.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   26,441     27,613     (4.2

Other operations (1)

   913     634     44.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net operating revenue

  R$27,354    R$28,247     (3.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   Year ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   %
Change
 
   (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

      

Residential customer services:

      

Residential fixed-line services

   R$3,282    R$4,170    (21.3) 

Broadband services

   2,187    2,423    (9.8) 

Pay TV services

   1,752    1,755    (0.2) 

Fixed-line interconnection

   43    53    (18.5) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   7,264    8,402    (13.5) 

Personal mobility services

      

Mobile telephony services

   6,602    6,608    (0.1) 

Mobile interconnection

   257    448    (42.6) 

Sales of handsets, SIM cards and other accessories

   158    195    (18.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   7,017    7,250    (3.2) 

B2B services

   5,528    5,981    (7.6) 

Other services

   140    227    (38.3) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   19,949    21,860    (8.7) 

Other operations(1)

   187    200    (6.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net operating revenue

   R$20,136    R$22,060    (8.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

(1)

Other operations includes the net operating revenue of Africatel from the date of our acquisition of PT Portugal on May 5, 2014 through December 31, 2015.Africatel.

Net operating revenue of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 3.2%8.7% during 2015,2019, principally due to (1) a 6.4%13.5% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, and to a lesser extent, a 7.6% decline in net operating revenue from B2B services, and a 3.2% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services, (2) a 4.1% decline in net operating revenue from SME/Corporate services, and (3) a 2.2% decline in net operating revenue from residential services. The effects of these declines on our net income were partially offset by 44.0% increase in net operating revenue from our other operations in Africa and Asia.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 35.7%36.1% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.during 2019. Residential customer services includesinclude fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), andPay-TV. Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 2.2%13.5%, primarily due to (1) the 8.6%14.2% decline in the average number of residential fixed-line customers; andRGUs, (2) the decline in fixed-mobile tariffs. These effects were partially offset byvoice traffic, and (3) the 6.4% increasereduction in the average monthly net residential revenue per user (calculated based on the total revenue for the year divided by the monthly average customer base for the year divided by 12) to R$78.8TU-RL andTU-RIU fixed line interconnection tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in 2015 from R$74.0 in 2014, primarily due to the increase in broadbandFebruary 2019 and Pay-TV revenues as well as initiatives to improve profitability of the customer base such as selling bundled services and higher value offers.February 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services.

Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 9.9%,21.3% during 2019, primarily due to:

to a 9.7%15.4% decline in net operating revenue from local fixed-line services, principally as a result of a 8.6% decline in the average number of residential fixed lines in service to 10.07.0 million during 2015as of December 31, 2019 2019 from 11.08.3 million during 2014,as of December 31, 2018, as a result of the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services;services and

a 9.5% decline the corresponding reduction in net operating revenue from long-distance, primarily as a result of (1) thevoice service traffic. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the 8.6% decline in the numbermigration of residentialour fixed-line customers,customer base to convergent service offerings and (2) the increase in the proportionother plans offering unlimited minutes of fixed-line customers that subscribe to alternative plans,usage, which include long-distance fixed line minutes as part of the monthly subscription fee.
generate greater revenue per user.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services.

Net operating revenue from residential broadband services, increasedwhich includes broadband services delivered through both our copper and fiber networks, declined by 4.5%,9.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of (1) a 7.6% increase13.9% decline in the number of our residential ADSL subscribers to 4.2 million as of December 31, 2019 from 4.9 million as of December 31, 2018, and (2) a 1.6% decline in the average net operating revenue per subscriber from broadband services. As of December 31, 2019, our xDSL subscribers represented 60.0% of our total residential fixed lines in service and subscribed to plans with an average speed of 33.3 Mbps as compared to 59.0% of our total residential fixed lines in service at an average speed of 9.8 Mbps as of December 31, 2018. The substantial increase in average speed of our residential broadband subscriptions primarily reflects the success of our program to increase subscriptions over our expanding FTTH network.

Net Operating Revenue fromPay-TV Services

Net operating revenue from residentialPay-TV services declined by 0.2% during 2019, primarily as a result of an 8.5% decline in the number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers to 1.45 million as of December 31, 2019 from 1.59 million as of December 31, 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by a 2.9% decline in the average number of our residential ADSL subscribers to 5.1 million during 2015 from 5.2 million during 2014. As of December 31, 2015, our ADSL subscribers represented 39.4% of our total residential subscribers as compared to 30.1% as of December 31, 2014.

Net Operating Revenue from Pay-TV Services. Net operating revenue from residential Pay-TV services increased by 38.9%, primarily as a result of a 48.2%0.3% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber. The average numberAs of December 31, 2019, ourPay-TV subscribers represented 20.7% of our total residential Pay-TV subscribers remained stable at 1.2 million during 2015 and 2014.fixed lines in service as compared to 19.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from personal mobility services represented 30.8%34.8% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.during 2019. Personal mobility services include sales of mobile telephony services to post-paid andpre-paid customers that include voice services and data communication services. Net operating revenue from personal mobility services declined by 6.4%3.2%, primarily due to (1) a 5.4%2.8% decline in the average number of our personal mobility customers, (2) the reduction in VU-M interconnection tariffs, and (3) decline in handsets revenue due to our strategy to outsource handsets sales in order to increase logistical efficiency and improve the supply of handsets in our sales channels. These effects were partially offset by an increase in data revenue, as a result of better mix acquisition, increased penetration of smartphones and the launch of our recent offerings.from mobile telephony services.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services.

Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services increaseddeclined by 5.3%0.1%, primarily due to an increase in data revenue, primarily due to the success of commercial and operational initiatives to improve the profitability of our customer base focused on increasing sales of our mobile services, such as data

services and value added services to smartphones, that are available to our post-paid and pre-paid subscribers. The effects of this increase was partially offset by a 5.4%10.3% decline in the number of our mobile customers that subscribe to 45.9our prepaid plans to 24.5 million during 2015as of December 31, 2019 from 48.527.3 million during 2014, primarilyas of December 31, 2018, principally as a result of (1) Brazil’s continuing high unemployment rate as our sales net additions of prepaid subscribers is closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate, (2) the migration of prepaid customers in Brazil to the use of a single SIM card as operators have increased the offer of“all-net” plans following the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and (3) our strict client disconnection policy for inactive customers, which is designed to reduce fee payments that we have introduced, particularlymust make for each active account.

The effects of these declines were partially offset by a 23.1% increase in the number of mobile customers that subscribed to our pre-paid customers,postpaid plans to control costs and improve the profitability9.5 million as of our business.December 31, 2019 from 7.7 million as of December 31, 2018. During 2019, data revenue represented 84.1% of net operating revenue from mobile telephony services compared to 71.7% during 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network.Network

Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 36.5% in 2015,42.6% during 2019, primarily as a result of the reduction in VU-M interconnectionMTR tariffs in February 2015.2019 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Net Operating Revenue from Sales of Handsets, SIM Cards and Accessories.Other AccessoriesNet operating revenue

Revenue from sales of handsets, SIM cards and other accessories declined by 53.4%18.7% during 2019, primarily as a result of our strategy to outsource handsetsthe reduction in sales in order to increase logistical efficiency and improve the supplyvolume of handsets indue to our sales channels.policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Net Operating Revenue from SME and CorporateB2B Services

Net operating revenue from SME and corporateB2B services represented 29.2%27.5% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015. SME and corporateduring 2019. B2B services include corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, and large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions. Netsolutions, and wholesale customers.Net operating revenue from SME and corporateB2B services which were temporarily increased during 2014 as a result of a contract that we had entered into with FIFA in connection with the 2014 FIFA World Cup, declined by 4.1%7.6%, primarily as a result of (1) lower voice traffic, following the decreasenatural market trend, (2) the reduction in fixed-mobile and mobile interconnectionMTR tariffs and (2) an 8.5%VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2019 and February 2018, and (3) the slow recovery of Brazilian economic activity, which has led to efforts by corporate and government customers to reduce costs, including telecommunications services costs, and has led to the downsizing or closing of many of our SME customers.

The total number of our B2B customers declined by 2.0% to 6.6 million as of December 31, 2019 from 6.7 million as of December 31, 2018, as the 5.9% decline in the number of SME and corporateB2B fixed-line customers to 7.2 million during 2015 from 7.9 million during 2014 principally due tomore than offset the effects of the worsening recession in Brazil. These effects were partially offset by the4.1% increase in revenues from IT and data corporate services.

Gross Profit

As a resultthe number of the 3.2% decline in net operating revenue in 2015 our consolidated gross profit declined by 7.3% to R$11,104 in 2015 from R$11,990 million in 2014. As a percentage of net operating revenue, gross profit declined to 40.6% in 2015 from 42.4% in 2014.B2B mobile customers.

Operating Expenses

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, we are required to segregate cost of sales and services from operating expenses in the preparation of our income statement.statement of operations. However, in evaluating and managing our business, we prepare reports in which we review the elements included in cost of sales and services and operating expenses classified by nature, as presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements. We believe that this classification improves our ability to understand results and trends in our business and that financial analysts and other investors who review our performance rely on this classification in performing their own analysis. Therefore, we have presented the discussion below of our operating expenses based on the classification of operating expenses presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 20152019 and 2014.2018.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Third-party services

  R$6,317    R$6,259     1.0

Depreciation and amortization

   6,195     5,767     7.4  

Rental and insurance

   3,600     3,120     15.4  

Personnel

   2,719     2,829     (3.9

Interconnection

   1,809     2,690     (32.8

Network maintenance services

   1,902     1,923     (1.1

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Taxes and other income (expenses)

   1,013     1,460     (30.6

Contingencies

   862     779     10.5  

Impairment losses

   591     —       n.m.  

Costs of handsets and accessories

   284     730     (61.0

Advertising and publicity

   406     674     (39.8

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   721     649     11.0  

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (278   (3,246   (91.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of sales and services

  R$26,141    R$23,634     10.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

n.m.Not meaningful.
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   %
Change
 
   (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Third-party services

   R$6,031    R$5,925    1.8 

Depreciation and amortization

   6,874    5,811    18.3 

Rental and insurance

   2,576    4,200    (38.7) 

Personnel

   2,529    2,594    (2.5) 

Network maintenance services

   1,014    1,104    (8.1) 

Interconnection

   487    658    (25.9) 

Provision for contingencies

   216    202    7.0 

Expected losses on trade receivables

   489    697    (29.8) 

Advertising and publicity

   497    382    30.1 

Handsets and other costs

   171    196    (13.0) 

Impairment losses

   2,111    291    623.6 

Taxes and other expenses

   111    250    (55.7) 

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (7)    (5,016)    (99.9) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of sales and services

   R$23,114    R$27,328    (15.4) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating expenses increaseddeclined by 10.6% in 2015,15.4% during 2019, principally due to:

to (1) a 91.4%, or R$2,968 million, decline in other operating income, net;

expenses, net to R$5917 million during 2019 from R$5,016 million during 2018, and (2) a 38.7%, or R$1,624 million, decline in rental and insurance costs to R$2,576 million during 2019 from R$4,200 million during 2018. The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) an increase in impairment losses;

a 7.4%, orlosses to R$4282,111 million during 2019 from R$292 million during 2018, and (2) an 18.3% increase in depreciation and amortization costs;

a 15.4%, orexpenses to R$4806,874 million increase in rental and insurance costs;

a 10.5%, orduring 2019 from R$ 835,811 million increase in contingencies;

during 2018.

a 11.0%, or R$ 72 million, increase in allowance for doubtful accounts; and

a 1.0%, or R$ 58 million, increase in third-party services.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by the declines in expenses below:

a 32.8%, or R$881 million, decline in interconnection costs;

a 30.6%, or R$447 million, decline in taxes and other expenses;

a 61.0%, or R$446 million, decline in costs of handsets and accessories

a 39.8%, or R$268 million, decline in advertising and publicity expenses; and

a 3.9%, or R$110 million, decline in personal expenses; and

a 1.1%, or R$21 million, decline in network maintenance services.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs increased by 1.0% in 2015,1.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of inflationary adjustments required by manyincreased selling expenses due to the intensification of our contracts, increased expenses for Pay-TV content and an increase in energy costs. The effects of these factors were partially offset by lower costs for consulting and advisory services, gains from the renegotiation of many of our contracts for third-party services and a reduction in sales commission expenses as a result of our efforts to optimize our sales channels through the increased use of our own channels.commercial activity.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs increased by 7.4%18.3% during 2019, primarily as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 as a result of which we recorded R$947 million of depreciation and amortization expenses with respect to right of use of assets during 2019.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs declined by 38.7% during 2019, primarily as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 as a result of which our lease expenses declined by R$1,551 million during 2019.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) declined by 2.5% during 2019, principally due to a 3.9% decline in 2015,direct employee expenses, including wages, taxes and benefits, the effects of which were partially offset by a 9.0% increase in profit sharing and provisions for profit sharing as a result of our achieving the objectives of these programs.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 8.1% during 2019, primarily as a result of (1) lower maintenance costs related to payphones following the approval of the PGMU, (2) the successful renegotiation of some of our maintenance contracts, and (3) a lower number of maintenance incidents as a result of our initiatives focused on preventive actions and productivity improvements, which have been increasing the efficiency of field operations, as well as efficiency gains arising from the digitalization of processes and customer service.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 25.9% during 2019, primarily as a result of the declines in MTR tariffs and theTU-RL andTU-RIU interconnection tariffs that were implemented in February 2019 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Provision for Contingencies

Provision for contingencies increased by 7.0% during 2019, primarily as a result of our revision of the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in labor lawsuits and civil lawsuits related to the financial interest agreements described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Financial Interest Agreements (PEX and PCT)” due to the revisions to our estimate model as a result of the history of terminations of lawsuits under the RJ Plan and our increased accumulated experience with estimating these losses.

Expected Losses on Trade Receivables

Expected losses on trade receivables declined by 29.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of a reduction in our level of customer defaults, particularly in our B2B business. During 2019, expected losses on trade receivables represented 2.4% of our net operating revenue compared to 3.2% during 2018.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses increased by 30.1% during 2019, primarily as a result of an intensification of our advertising campaigns, particularly for our FTTH services and personal mobility services.

Handsets and Other Costs

Handsets and other costs declined by 13.0% during 2019, primarily due to the reduction in sales volume of handsets due to our policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Impairment Losses

We recorded impairment losses of R$2,111 million during 2019 as a result of our testing of ournon-current assets for impairment under IAS 36 as of December 31, 2019, primarily due to (1) the revision of our strategic plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that is designed to maximize the Company’s value in the context of our judicial reorganization; and (2) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the residential market, which accelerated the decline in the revenues from fixed-line services and DTH services. This impairment loss was fully allocated to the carrying value of our regulatory licenses. We recorded impairment losses of R$292 million during 2018, consisting of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses declined by 55.7% during 2019, primarily due to a decrease in other tax expenses, as a result of a decline in other revenues to which other taxes are associated, and a decrease in expenses for fines.

Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating expenses, net was R$7 million during 2019, consisting primarily of the effects the accounting recognition during 2019 of R$1,518 million of PIS and COFINS credits as the result of a final and unappealable court decision permitting us to deduct ICMS from our tax base for the purposes of calculation PIS and COFINS and the recovery of previous overpayments of PIS and COFINS, the effects of which were partially offset by (1) the recognition of R$1,231 million of expenses for provisions related to the recognition of onerous contract arising from the provision of satellite capacity, and (2) the derecognition during 2019 of R$167 million related to the reconciliation of tax credits and tax incentives from prior periods that we do not expect to be realized.

Other operating expenses, net was R$5,016 million during 2018 consisting primarily of (1) the recognition of R$4,884 million of expenses for provisions related to the recognition of onerous contract for the supply of submarine cable capacity, and (2) the recognition of R$109 million of revenue from the reversal of a provision for contingencies due to the reprocessing of the provision estimate model considering the new profile for closing the lawsuits in a new context after approval and ratification of the RJ Plan.

Operating Profit before Financial Expenses, Net, and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, our Telecommunications in Brazil segment recorded operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of R$2,864 million during 2019 compared to operating profit before financial expenses, net, and taxes of R$5,185 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was 14.4% during 2019 and operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was 23.7% during 2018.

Operating expenses of our other operations increased by 6.1% to R$300 million during 2019 from R$283 million during 2018. The operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased by 36.9% to R$113 million during 2019 from R$83 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations was 60.7% during 2019 and 41.4% during 2018.

Our consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes declined by 43.5% to R$2,977 million during 2019 from R$5,268 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes was 14.8% during 2019 and 23.9% during 2018.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income declined by 91.4% to R$2,662 million during 2019 from R$30,950 million during 2018, primarily due to (1) our recognition of the fair value of third-party borrowings and financing arising from the impacts of the ratification of the RJ Plan of R$49 million during 2019 compared to R$13,290 million during 2018, (2) our recording no gains or losses on our restructuring of our third-party borrowings during 2019 compared to our recording a R$11,055 million gains as a result of the novation of the debt represented by the Defaulted Bonds, calculated pursuant to the RJ Plan, during 2018, (3) our recording reversal of interest and other income of R$170 million during 2019 compared to R$4,080 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in the RJ Plan, adjusted in the period prior to the Brazilian Confirmation Date, of R$3,013 million and adjustment of trade payables and default payment to present value of R$877 million, during 2018, and (4) our recording inflation adjustment and foreign exchange difference on the fair value adjustment of R$334 million during 2019 compared to R$1,399 million during 2018.

The effects of these factors was partially offset by our recording interest and inflation adjustment to other assets of R$1,922 million during 2019, primarily consisting of R$2,100 million related to the monetary restatement on PIS and COFINS credits resulting from the exclusion of ICMS from its calculation base and the recovery of previous overpayments of PIS and COFINS, compared to interest and inflation adjustment to other assets of R$809 million during 2018.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses increased by 102.0% to R$8,772 million during 2019 from R$4,342 million during 2018, primarily as a result of:

our recording interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,618 million during 2019 compared to our recording a reversal of interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,793 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of interest on debt included in the RJ Plan of R$3,115 million, partially offset by interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,362 million, during 2018;

our recording reversals of inflation adjustments to provisions of R$1,620 million during 2019 compared to R$227 million during 2018, principally as a result of (1) our revision of the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in labor lawsuits and civil lawsuits during 2019 due to the revisions to our estimate model as a result of the history of terminations of lawsuits under the RJ Plan and our increased accumulated experience with estimating these losses, and (2) our reversal of a portion of our provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment during 2019 as a result of the revisions to our estimate model to take into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan;

our recording R$949 million in interest on leases during 2019 as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019;

a 48.2%, or R$603 million, increase in interest on and inflation adjustment to other liabilities to R$1,854 during 2019 from R$1,251 million during 2018, principally as a result of our recording R$742 million of exchange rate loss and amortization of deferred gains relating to the present value adjustment of our onerous obligation recorded at the end of 2018; and

our recording a R$238 million loss on cash investments classified asheld-for-sale during 2019, primarily as a result of a R$404 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and dividends receivable in Unitel, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during this period, compared to a R$293 million gain during 2018, principally as a result of (1) a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar, during this period, and (2) R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel;

The effects of these factors were partially offset by a 74.3%, or R$1,854 million, decline in inflation and exchange gains on third-party borrowings to R$640 million during 2019 from R$2,494 million during 2018, principally as a result of the positive impact on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt of the 4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2019 as compared to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018, as well as our recording capital gains associated to the novation of debts arising on the Defaulted Bonds of R$555 million during 2019.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% during 2019 and 2018. We recorded an income tax and social contribution expense of R$8 million during 2019 compared to an income tax and social contribution benefit of R$3,275 million during 2018. The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (0.1)% during 2019 and the effective tax rate applicable to our profit before taxes was (15.3)% during 2018. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2019  2018 

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

   34.0  34.0

Equity in investees

   0.0   0.0 

Tax incentives

   0.0   0.0 

Permanent Deductions(add-backs)

   (3.4  (62.3

Reversal of (allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets

   (27.2  12.9 

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries

   (3.4  0.0 

Effective rate

   (0.1)%   (15.3)% 

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (0.1)% during 2019, resulting in a tax expense despite our generating a loss before taxes, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets that were recognized for the companies that as of December 31, 2019, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$2,474 million and reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 27.2%, (2) the tax effects of permanentadd-backs, mostly as a result of the effects of the recognition of the amortization of deferred gains relating to the fair value adjustment due to the restructured liabilities after confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 3.4%, and, (3) the tax effects of unrecognized deferred tax assets regarding foreign subsidiaries that are not eligible to recognize tax credits on tax loss carryforwards, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 3.4%.

The effective tax rate applicable to our income before taxes was (15.3)% during 2018, resulting in a tax benefit despite our generating income before taxes, primarily as a result of permanent deductions, mostly as a result of the effects of the novation of our debt obligations due to the confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced our effective tax rate by 62.3%. The effects of this factor was partially offset by the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$2,757 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2018, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which increased our effective tax rate by 12.9%.

Profit (Loss)

As a result of the foregoing, we recorded consolidated loss of R$9,095 million during 2019 compared to consolidated profit of R$24,616 million 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our loss was 45.2% during 2019 compared to profit of 111.6% during 2018.

Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2017

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated statement of operations, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

   

Year ended December 31,

   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Net operating revenue

  R$22,060  R$23,790  (7.3)

Cost of sales and services

  (16,179)  (15,669)  3.3
  

 

  

 

  

Gross profit

  5,881  8,121  (27.6)

Operating income (expenses)

      

Selling expenses

  (3,853)  (4,103)  (6.1)

General and administrative expenses

  (2,739)  (3,137)  (12.7)

Other operating income (expenses), net

  (4,557)  (3,242)  40.6
  

 

  

 

  

Operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes

  (5,268)  (2,361)  123.1

Financial income (expenses), net

  26,609  (3,197)  n.m
  

 

  

 

  

Income (loss) before taxes

  21,341  (5,558)  n.m.

Income tax and social contribution

  3,275  (1,099)  n.m.
  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss)

  R$24,616  R$(6,656)  n.m.
  

 

  

 

  

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

   

Year ended December 31,

   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

      

Residential customer services:

      

Residential fixed-line services

  R$4,170  R$4,881  (14.6)

Broadband services

  2,423  2,642  (8.3)

Pay TV services

  1,755  1,578  11.2

Fixed-line interconnection

  53  71  (24.6)
  

 

  

 

  
  8,402  9,171  (8.4)

Personal mobility services

      

Mobile telephony services

  6,608  6,915  (4.4)

Mobile interconnection

  448  500  (10.4)

Sales of handsets, SIM cards and other accessories

  195  230  (15.1)
  

 

  

 

  
  7,250  7,645  (5.2)

B2B services

  5,981  6,486  (7.8)

Other services

  227  256  (11.2)
  

 

  

 

  
  21,860  23,557  (7.2)

Other operations(1)

  200  233  (14.0)
  

 

  

 

  

Net operating revenue

  R$22,060  R$23,790  (7.3)
  

 

  

 

  

(1)

Other operations includes the net operating revenue of Africatel.

Net operating revenue of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 7.2% during 2018, principally due to an 8.4% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, a 7.8% decline in net operating revenue from B2B services, and a 5.2% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 38.1% of our net operating revenue during 2018. Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 8.4%, primarily due to (1) the 7.2% decline in the number of residential RGUs, (2) the decline in voice traffic, and (3) the reduction inTU-RL andTU-RIU fixed line interconnection tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018. These effects were partially offset by the 0.6% increase in the average monthly net residential revenue per user to R$80.0 during 2018 from R$79.6 during 2017, primarily due to an increase in broadband andPay-TV revenues.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services

Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 14.6%, primarily due to a 10.4% decline in the number of residential fixed lines in service to 8.3 million as of December 31, 2018 from 9.2 million as of December 31, 2017, as a result of the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services and the corresponding reduction in voice service traffic. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the migration of our fixed-line customer base to convergent service offerings and other plans offering unlimited minutes of usage, which generate greater revenue per user.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services

Net operating revenue from residential broadband services declined by 8.3%, primarily as a result of (1) a 6.8% decline in the number of our residential ADSL subscribers to 4.9 million as of December 31, 2018 from 5.2 million as of December 31, 2017, and (2) a 5.4% decline in the average net operating revenue per subscriber from broadband services. As of December 31, 2018, our xDSL subscribers represented 58.4% of our total residential fixed lines in service and subscribed to plans with an average speed of 9.8 Mbps as compared to 55.8% of our total residential fixed lines in service at an average speed of 8.3 Mbps as of December 31, 2017.

Net Operating Revenue fromPay-TV Services

Net operating revenue from residentialPay-TV services increased by 11.2%, primarily as a result of a 6.1% increase in the number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers to 1.59 million as of December 31, 2018 from 1.50 million as of December 31, 2017, and a 1.5% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber, principally as a result of the shift in the our sales mix towards more comprehensive packages of channels. As of December 31, 2018, ourPay-TV subscribers represented 19.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as compared to 16.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from Personal Mobility Services represented 32.9% of our net operating revenue during 2018. Net operating revenue from Personal Mobility Services declined by 5.2%, primarily due to a 4.4% decline in revenue from mobile telephony services.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services

Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services declined by 4.4%, primarily due to an 8.8% decline in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our prepaid plans to 27.3 million as of December 31, 2018 from 29.9 million as of December 31, 2017, principally as a result of (1) Brazil’s high unemployment rate as our sales net additions of prepaid subscribers is closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate, (2) the migration of prepaid customers in Brazil to the use of a single SIM card as operators have increased the offer of“all-net” plans following the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and (3) our strict disconnection policy for inactive customers, which is designed to reduce fee payments that we must make for each active account.

The effects of these declines were partially offset by (1) a 1.7% increase in average monthly net revenue per user, primarily as a result of an improvement in the profile of our customer base, and (2) a 15.0% increase in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our postpaid plans to 7.7 million as of December 31, 2018 from 6.7 million as of December 31, 2017. During 2018, data revenue represented 71.7% of net operating revenue from mobile telephony services compared to 53.9% during 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network

Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 10.4% during 2018, primarily as a result of the reduction in MTR tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Net Operating Revenue from Sales of Handsets, SIM Cards and Other Accessories

Revenue from handsets, SIM cards and other accessories declined by 15.1% during 2018, primarily as a result of the reduction in sales volume of handsets due to our policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Net Operating Revenue from B2B Services

Net operating revenue from B2B services represented 27.1% of our net operating revenue during 2018. Net operating revenue from B2B services declined by 7.8%, primarily as a result of (1) lower voice traffic, following the natural market trend, (2) the reduction in MTR tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018, (3) the slowdown in Brazilian economic activity, which has led to efforts by corporate and government customers to reduce costs, including telecommunications services costs, and has led to the downsizing or closing of many of our SME customers, and (4) market perceptions of our company during our RJ Proceedings which made it difficult for us to enter into new agreements with corporate customers.

The total number of our B2B customers increased by 3.3% to 6.7 million as of December 31, 2018 from 6.5 million as of December 31, 2017, as the 15.3% increase in B2B mobile customers more than offset the 3.5% decline in B2B fixed-line customers.

Operating Expenses

We have presented the discussion below of our operating expenses based on the classification of operating expenses presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements. The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

   

Year Ended December 31,

   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Third-party services

  R$5,925  R$6,221  (4.8)

Depreciation and amortization

  5,811  5,109  13.7

Rental and insurance

  4,200  4,163  0.9

Personnel

  2,594  2,791  (7.1)

Network maintenance services

  1,104  1,252  (11.8)

Interconnection

  658  778  (15.4)

Provision for contingencies

  202  469  (56.9)

Expected losses on trade receivables

  697  692  0.8

Advertising and publicity

  382  414  (7.6)

Handsets and other costs

  196  223  (12.1)

Impairment losses

  291  (4,747)  n.m.

Taxes and other expenses

  250  543  (54.0)

Other operating income (expenses), net

  (5,016)  (8,243)  (39.1)
  

 

  

 

  

Total cost of sales and services

  R$27,328  R$26,151  4.5
  

 

  

 

  

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Operating expenses increased by 4.5% during 2018, principally due to (1) impairment losses of R$292 million recorded in 2018 compared to a reversal of impairment losses of R$4,701 million in 2017, and (2) a 13.7%, or R$702 million, increase in depreciation and amortization expense. The effects of these factors were partially offset by a 38.8%, or R$3,180 million, decline in other operating income, net, and to a lesser degree:

a 4.8%, or R$297 million, decline in third-party service costs;

a 54.0%, or R$293 million, decline in taxes and other expenses;

a 7.1%, or R$197 million, decline in personnel expenses;

an 11.8%, or R$147 million, decline in network maintenance service costs; and

a 15.4%, or R $120 million, decline in interconnection costs.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs declined by 4.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of lower selling expenses, information technology expenses and call center expenses as a result of our adoption of our new customer care model and, to a lesser extent the deferral of a portion of our selling expenses as a result of our implementation of ASC 606 for periods ending after January 1, 2018. The effects of these factors were partially offset by higher TV content costs as a result of the growth of ourPay-TV customer base and adjustments in contractual terms by some of our content providers, and by increased electricity costs as a result of the applicable electricity tariffs.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs increased by 13.7% during 2018, primarily as a result of the growth of our data and mobile network due to our strategy of modernization of the core network focusing on transmission and transport infrastructure, which has increased the amount of depreciable property, plant and equipment and amortizable license.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs increased by 15.4% in 2015,0.9% during 2018, primarily as a result of (1) an increase in rental costs relating to our network infrastructure as a result of our sale of non-strategic assets, principally mobile towers that we sold in December 2014, (2) an increase inreaisof certain rental expenses denominated in U.S. dollars as a result of the depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2015,2018, particularly expenses relating to our agreements with GlobeNet and our lease of capacity on theSES-6 satellite, and (3) annual contractual adjustments under our rental agreements. satellite.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) declined by 3.9% in 2015,7.1% during 2018, primarily as a result of a reductioninitiatives that we have implemented to promote greater efficiency and productivity as well as stricter cost controls related in the number of our employees during the first half of 2015. The effects of this reduction in headcount was partially offset by (1) an increase in the number of our employees in October 2015 as a result of our acquisition of a portion of Telemont’s network service operations in the State of Rio de Janeiro which performs plant maintenance operations for our company, and (2) increases in the compensation of some of our employees as a result of the renegotiation of some of our collective bargaining agreements at the end of 2015.

Impairment Losses

Expenses on impairment losses refers a R$591 million loss related to (1) R$501 million related to goodwill and trademarks for the operations in Brazil due to a significant change in the macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, and (2) R$89 million related to loss on goodwill assets related to our operations in Africa.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 32.8%, primarily as a result of the 33% decline in VU-M interconnection tariffs that was mandated for February 2015 and the decline in off-net mobile voice traffic.personnel expenses.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 1.1%11.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of a lower number of maintenance incidents as a result of our initiatives focused on preventive actions and productivity improvements, which have been increasing the efficiency of field operations, as well as efficiency gains arising from the digitalization of processes and customer service.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 15.4% during 2018, primarily as a result of the declines in 2015,MTR tariffs and theTU-RL andTU-RIU interconnection tariffs that were implemented in February 2018 and February 2017, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Provision for Contingencies

Provision for contingencies declined by 56.9% during 2018, primarily as a result of our acquisitionreversal of a portion of Telemont’s network service operationsour provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment due to the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the Statecontext of Rio de Janeiro which performs plant maintenance operations for our company,the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan.

Expected Losses on Trade Receivables

Expected losses on trade receivables increased by 0.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of whichour revision of the assumptions that we no longer incuruse in determining our expected losses on trade receivables. During 2018, expected losses on trade receivables represented 3.2% of our net operating revenue compared to 2.9% during 2017.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses declined by 7.6% during 2018, primarily as a result of a decline in the volume of our advertising campaigns.

Handsets and Other Costs

Handsets and other costs declined by 12.1% during 2018, primarily due to third partiesthe lower volume of handset sales.

Impairment Losses

We recorded impairment losses of R$292 million during 2018 compared to a reversal of impairment losses of R$4,747 million during 2017. Impairment losses in 2018 consisted of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for these services.impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives. The effectsreversal of these savings were partially offset by annual contractual adjustments under our agreementsimpairment losses in 2017 consisted of the partial reversal of impairment losses related to the expected future profitability of assets with network maintenance service providers.finite useful lives, due to the scenarios and financial indicators taken into consideration in the cash flows from the RJ Plan.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses declined by 30.6% in 201554.0% during 2018, primarily due to a decrease in other tax expenses, due toas a decreaseresult of a decline in other revenues to which other taxes are associated, and a decrease in expenses for fines.

ContingenciesOther Operating Expenses, Net

Provisions increased by 10.5% in 2015, primarily as a result of an increase in small consumer claims against our company.

Costs of Handsets and Accessories

Costs of handsets and accessoriesOther operating expenses, net declined by 61.0% in 2015, primarily as a result of our strategy to outsource handsets sales in order to increase logistical efficiency and improve the supply of handsets in our sales channels.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses, which were temporarily increased38.8% during 2014 as a result of costs of advertising campaigns related to our sponsorship of the 2014 FIFA World Cup, declined by 39.8% in 2015, primarily as a result of our focus on more selective sales in 2015, which led to a reduction in our advertising and publicity efforts.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for doubtful accounts increased by 11.0% in 2015,2018, primarily as a result of the increase in customer delinquencieseffects ofnon-recurring expenses, which occurred during 2017, related to unrecoverable tax,write-off of other assets and other expenses due to the worsening recession in Brazil. During the year ended December 31, 2015, allowance for doubtful accounts represented 2.7% of our net operating revenue compared to 2.3% in 2014.

Other Operating Income, Net

Other operating income, net declined by 91.4% to R$278 million in 2015 from R$3,246 million in 2014. The principal components of other operating income, net in 2015 were (1) a R$326 million reversal of a civil contingency arising from the revisionreconcile accounting balances as part of the methodology we use to calculate civil contingencies, and (2) R$48 million in costs relating to terminations of employees during 2015.RJ Proceedings.

The principal components of other operating income, net in 2014 were:

a R$2,399 million gain, net of transaction expenses, relating to the sale of Caryopoceae and Tupã Torres which owned an aggregate of 3,648 mobile communications towers used in our mobile services business;

a R$355 million reversal of allowance arising from our review of the methodology used to calculate allowances for losses on corporate processes; and

a R$476 million reversal of the allowance relating to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program as a result of our settlement of a portion of our obligations for principal, interest and fines utilizing tax loss carryforwards.

Operating Income (Loss) before Financial Income (Expenses)Expenses, Net, and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, our consolidatedthe operating incomeloss before financial income (expenses) and taxes was R$1,213 million compared to our consolidated operating income before financial income (expenses)expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment increased by 126.3% to R$4,6135,185 million during 2018 from R$2,291 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in 2014.Brazil segment was 23.7% during 2018 and 9.7% during 2017.

Operating expenses of our other operations declined by 6.5% to R$283 million during 2018 from R$303 million during 2017, principally as a result of the disposition of our interest in MTC in January 2017. The operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased by R$13 million to R$83 million during 2018 from R$70 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations was 41.4% during 2018 compared to 30.0% during 2017.

Our consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes increased by 123.1% to R$5,268 million during 2018 from R$2,361 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating incomeloss before financial income (expenses)expenses, net, and taxes was 4.4%23.9% during 2015 compared to 16.3% in 2014.2018 and 9.9% during 2017.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income increased by 298.9% to R$5,36530,950 million in 2015during 2018 from R$1,3457,136 million in 2014,during 2017, primarily due to (1) our recording a R$11,055 million gain on our restructuring of our third-party borrowings during 2018 as a result of the novation of the debt represented by the Defaulted Bonds, calculated pursuant to the RJ Plan, compared to no gains or losses recorded during 2017, (2) an increase in adjustment to fair value of exchange rate gains on foreign investmentsthird-party borrowings and financing by 127.7% to R$3,35013,290 million in 2015during 2018, principally related to fair value adjustments of our third-party borrowings, from R$324,873 million during 2017, principally related to the revision of the calculations of the provisions for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL, (3) an increase in 2014,the reversal of other interest and other income to R$4,080 million during 2018, principally as a result of (1) an increasethe reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in the RJ Plan, adjusted in the period prior to the Brazilian Confirmation Date, of R$3,013 million and adjustment of trade payables and default payment to present value of R$877 million, from R$500 million during 2017, and (4) our balances invested in cash maintained offshorerecording a R$1,399 million inflation adjustment and foreign exchange difference on the fair value adjustment.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses declined by 58.0% to R$4,342 million during 2018 from R$10,333 million during 2017, primarily as a result of:

our recording of a reversal of interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,793 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of interest on debt included in the RJ Plan of R$3,115 million, partially offset by interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,362 million, during 2018 compared to our salerecording interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of PT Portugal, (2) the 22.8% depreciation of therealagainst the euroR$3,594 million during the second half of 2015.2017;

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses increased by 102.0%a 49.9% decline in interest on and inflation adjustment to other liabilities to R$11,903789 million in 2015during 2018 from R$5,8941,554 million during 2017, principally due to the commencement of our participation in 2014, primarily due to:the Tax Recovery Program (REFIS) in May 2017;

 

  an increase in inflation adjustment and exchange differences

our recording of a gain on third party borrowing toheld-for-sale financial assets of R$10,908 million in 2015 from R$1,465293 million during 2014,2018, primarily as a result of (1)(i) the classification of the financial results of PTIF in our financial expenses rather than as a part of our discontinued operations following the conclusion of the sale of PT Portugal in June 2015, and (2) the 47.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the 31.7% depreciation of thereal against the Euro during 2015 comparedR$829 million exchange gain rate due to the 13.4%17.1% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2018, and (ii) R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and the stabilityrevision of thereal recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, compared to a loss onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million during 2017, primarily as a result of the loss recorded based on our revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange losses rate related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the EuroU.S. dollar and thereal during 2014; and2017;

 

a 38.1% increase66.4% decline in interest on loans payable to third parties and debenturesreversals of inflation adjustment of provisions for contingencies to R$4,050227 million during 20152018 from R$2,933675 million, during 2014, primarily as a result of our classificationreversal of a portion of our provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment due to the reprocessing of the financial resultsprovision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of PTIFdiscontinuation of lawsuits in our financial expenses rather thanthe context of the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan, during 2017; and

a 14.6% decline in inflation adjustment to and exchange losses on third-party borrowings to R$2,494 million during 2018 from R$2,920 million during 2017, principally as a partresult of our discontinued operations followingrecording capital gains associated with the conclusionnovation of debts arising on the saleDefaulted Bonds of PT Portugal in June 2015.R$555 million during 2018.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by an(1) our recording a R$760 million adjustment to fair value to the amortization of deferred gains during 2018 compared to no gains or losses recorded during 2017, and (2) a 70.0%, or R$358 million, increase in gainstax on derivativesfinancial transactions to R$5,797 million during 2015 from R$427 million during 2014, primarily as a result of the 47.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the 31.7% depreciation of thereal against the Euro during 2015 compared to the 13.4% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the stability of therealagainst the Euro during 2014.bank fees.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% in each of 2015the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2014.2017. We recorded an income tax and social contribution expensebenefits of R$3,3793,275 million during 2015 compared to2018 and an income tax and social contribution expense of R$7581,099 million during 2014.2017. The effective tax rate applicable to our income before taxes was (15.3)% during 2018 and the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was 63.5%(19.8)% during 2015 and the effective tax rate applicable to our income before taxes was 1,179.5% during 2014.2017. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015  2014 

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

   34.0  34.0

Tax effects of valuation allowance

   (89.3  (9.1

Tax effects of differentiated tax rates

   (2.0  37.0  

Tax effects of permanent additions

   (5.1  1,071.3  

Tax effects of permanent exclusions

   2.1    (585.3

Tax effect of REFIS permanent additions

   —      689.7  

Tax incentives (SUDENE)

   0.1    (56.4

Tax amnesty program

   (3.1  —    

Tax effects of other

   (0.3  (1.8

Effective rate

   (63.5)%   1,179.5
   

Year Ended December 31,

   

2018

  

2017

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

  34.0%  34.0%

Equity in investees

  0.0  0.0

Tax incentives

  0.0  0.3

Permanent deductions(add-backs)

  (62.3)  2.7

Reversal of (allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets

  12.9  (48.9)

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries

  0.0  (7.8)

Effective rate

  (15.3)%  (19.8)%

The effective tax rate applicable to our lossincome before taxes was (63.5)(15.3)% during 2018, resulting in 2015,a tax benefit despite our generating income before taxes, primarily as a result of permanent deductions, mostly as a result of the effects of the novation of our debt obligations due to the confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced our effective tax rate by 62.3%. The effects of this factor was partially offset by the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$4,7552,757 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2015,2018, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which increased our effective tax rate by 12.9%.

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (19.8)% during 2017, resulting in a tax expense, primarily as a result of (1) tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$2,718 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2017, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 89.3%48.9% (effectively increasing our tax expense), and (2) the tax effects of unrecognized deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries that are not eligible to recognize tax credits on tax loss carryforwards, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 7.8% (effectively increasing our tax expense).

Our effective tax rate was 1,179.5% in 2014, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effect of permanent additions related to the write-off of R$266 million of tax credits related to potential loss on the shares of Pharol held by Telemar, which increased our effective tax rate by 1,071.3%, and (2) the tax effect of REFIS permanent additions related to the settlement of principal, fines and interest in amount of R$443 million payable to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program through the use of tax loss carryforwards as permitted by Article 2 of Law 12996/2014 and Article 33 of Law 13043/2014, which increased our effective tax rate by 689.7%. The effect of these factors was partially offset by the tax effect of REFIS permanent exclusion related to the settlement of principal, fines and interest in amount of R$219 million payable to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program through the use of tax loss carryforwards, which reduced our effective tax rate by 585.3%.

Net Loss from Continuing Operations

Our net loss from continuing operations was R$8,705 million in 2015 compared to R$694 million in 2014. As a percentage of net operating revenue, net loss from continuing operations was 31.8% in 2015 compared to 2.5% in 2014.

Net Loss from Discontinued Operations

Net loss from discontinued operations in 2015 of R$867 million consisted of a R$226 million loss related to the cumulative foreign exchange differences recognized in other comprehensive income, transferred from equity to net income from discontinued operations for the year due to the sale of PT Portugal and expenses of R$625 million of expenses related to the derecognized investment cost that includes goodwill arising on the business combination of our company with PT Portugal less selling expenses and cash received directly our company.

Net loss from discontinued operations in 2014 of R$4,086 million consisted of (1) the allowance for loss in the amount of R$3,836 million on the investment of PT Portugal resulting from the recognition of assets of PT Portugal at fair value, less selling expenses, and (2) loss from discontinued operations of PT Portugal in the amount of R$250 million. The sales price used to determine the allowance for loss corresponds to purchase price under the PTP Share Purchase Agreement of R$22,267 million (€6,900 million) and liabilities on retirement and other benefits assumed by PT Portugal, amounting to R$3,872 million (€1,200 million).

Net Income

As a result of the foregoing, our consolidated net loss increased by 100.2% to R$9,572 million during 2015 from R$4,780 million during 2014. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our net loss was 35.0% during 2015 and 16.9% during 2014.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2013

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated income statement, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   % Change 
   (in millions ofreais, except percentages) 

Net operating revenue

  R$28,247    R$28,422     (0.6

Cost of sales and services

   (16,257   (16,467   (1.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Gross profit

   11,990     11,955     0.3  

Operating income (expenses)

      

Selling expenses

   (5,566   (5,532   0.6  

General and administrative expenses

   (3,835   (3,683   4.1  

Other operating income (expenses), net

   2,024     1,243     62.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating income before financial income (expenses) and taxes

   4,613     3,983     15.8  

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   % Change 
   (in millions ofreais, except percentages) 

Financial income

   1,345     1,375     (2.2

Financial expenses

   (5,894   (4,677   26.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Financial expenses, net

   (4,549   (3,302   37.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Income before taxes

   64     681     (90.6

Income tax and social contribution

   (758   (77   889.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (694   604     (214.8

Net loss from discontinued operations

   (4,086   —       n.m.  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income (loss)

  R$(4,780  R$604     (890.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Residential

  R$9,995    R$10,303     (3.0

Personal mobility

   9,011     9,290     (3.0

SME/Corporate

   8,312     8,455     (1.7

Other services and businesses (1)

   929     374     148.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net operating revenue

  R$28,247    R$28,422     (0.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

(1)Other services and businesses includes the net operating revenue of Africatel from the date of our acquisition of PT Portugal on May 5, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

Net operating revenue declined by 0.6% during 2014, principally due to (1) a 3.0% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, (2) a 3.0% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services, and (3) a 1.7% decline in net operating revenue from SME/Corporate services. These effects were partially offset by 148.4% increase in net operating revenue from other services and businesses primarily as a result of our consolidation of the results of Africatel as from May 5, 2014, which generated net operating revenue of R$635 million.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 35.4% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 3.0%, primarily due to (1) the 6.7% decline in the average number of residential fixed-line customers; and (2) the decline in fixed-mobile tariffs. These effects were partially offset by the 5.1% increase in the average monthly net residential revenue per user (calculated based on the total revenue for the year divided by the monthly average customer base for the year divided by 12) to R$74.0 in 2014 from R$70.4 in 2013, primarily due to the increase in broadband and Pay-TV revenues.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services. Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 6.1%, primarily due to:

a 4.9% decline in net operating revenue from local fixed-line services, principally as a result of a 6.7% decline in the average number of residential fixed lines in service to 11.0 million during 2014 from 11.8 million during 2013, as a result of the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services; and

a 14.7% decline in net operating revenue from long-distance, primarily as a result of (1) aggressive discounting campaigns undertaken by our competitors, (2) the effects of the 6.7% decline in the number of residential fixed-line customers, and (3) the increase in the proportion of fixed line customers that subscribe to alternative plans, which include long-distance fixed line minutes as part of the monthly subscription fee.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services. Net operating revenue from residential broadband services increased by 3.2%, primarily as a result of a 3.2% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber. The average number of our residential ADSL subscribers remained stable at 5.2 million in 2014 and 2013. As of December 31, 2014, our ADSL customer base represented 37.2% of our total fixed lines in service as compared to 33.9% as of December 31, 2013.

Net Operating Revenue from Pay-TV Services. Net operating revenue from residential Pay-TV services increased by 11.3%, primarily as a result of the increase in the number of our residential Pay-TV subscribers to 1.2 million during 2014 from 0.9 million during 2013.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from personal mobility services represented 31.9% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net operating revenue from personal mobility services declined by 3.0%, primarily as a result of the reduction in VU-M interconnection tariffs. This effect was partially offset by an increase in pre-paid recharge revenues, mobile data revenue and sales of handsets.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services. Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services increased by 3.0%, primarily due to (1) a 0.7% increase in the number of our pre-paid mobile customers to 41.3 million during 2014 from 41.1 million during 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in pre-paid recharge revenue and mobile data revenue primarily as a result of our launches of new promotions that include bonus minutes, packages of data services and credits for use for our text messaging services, and (2) 6.4% increase in the number of our post-paid mobile customers to 7.1 million during 2014 from approximately 6.7 million during 2013, primarily as a result of the success of commercial and operational initiatives focused on increasing sales of our premium services, such as data services and value added services, that are available to subscribers of our plans. These effects were partially offset by a 5.9% decline in the average monthly net mobile revenue per user to R$18.7 in 2014 from R$20.4 in 2013.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network. Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 34.8% in 2014, primarily as a result of the reduction in VU-M interconnection tariffs in February 2014.

Net Operating Revenue from Sales of Handsets and Accessories.Net operating revenue from sales of handsets and accessories increased by 50.7% as a result of our strategy of selling premium mobile devices, such as smart phones, as part of our efforts to acquire new high value customers and retain existing ones.

Net Operating Revenue from SME and Corporate Services

Net operating revenue from SME and corporate services represented 29.4% of our net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net operating revenue from SME and corporate services declined by 1.7%, primarily as a result of (1) the decrease in fixed-mobile and mobile interconnection tariffs, and (2) a 4.0% decline in the number of SME and corporate customers to 7.9 million during 2014 from 8.2 million during 2013. These effects were partially offset by the increase in revenues from IT and data corporate services.

Net Operating Revenue from SME Services. Net operating revenue from SME services increased by 1.0%, primarily as a result of an increased demand for these services.

Net Operating Revenue from Corporate Services. Net operating revenue from corporate services declined by 2.9%, primarily as a result of (1) the decrease in fixed-mobile and mobile interconnection tariffs, and (2) the 4.0% decline in the average number of our corporate customers.

Gross Profit

As a result of the 0.6% decline in net operating revenue in 2014, coupled with a decline in cost of sales and services of 1.3% in 2014, our consolidated gross profit increased by 0.3% to R$11,990 million in 2014 from R$11,955 million in 2013. As a percentage of net operating revenue, gross profit increased to 42.4% in 2014 from 42.1% in 2013.

Operating Expenses

The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Third-party services

  R$6,259    R$6,120     2.3  

Depreciation and amortization

   5,767     5,692     1.3  

Rental and insurance

   3,120     2,120     47.2  

Personnel

   2,829     2,534     11.6  

Interconnection

   2,690     3,966     (32.2

Network maintenance services

   1,923     2,328     (17.4

Taxes and other income (expenses)

   1,460     1,398     4.4  

Contingencies

   779     657     18.6  

Costs of handsets and accessories

   730     515     41.7  

Advertising and publicity

   674     557     21.2  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   649     923     (29.6

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (3,246   (2,370   37.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of sales and services

  R$23,634    R$24,440     (3.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating expenses declined by 3.3% in 2014, principally due to:

a 32.2%, or R$1,276 million, decline in interconnection costs;

a 37.0%, or R$876 million, increase in other operating income, net;

a 17.4%, or R$405 million, decline in network maintenance services costs; and

a 29.6%, or R$273 million, decline in the allowance for doubtful accounts.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by the increases in expenses below:

a 47.2%, or R$1,000 million, increase in rental and insurance costs;

an 11.6%, or R$295 million, increase in personnel expenses;

a 41.7%, or R$215 million, increase in costs of handsets and accessories;

a 2.3%, or R$142 million, increase in third-party service costs;

an 18.6%, or R$122 million, increase in contingencies;

a 21.2%, or R$118 million, increase in advertising and publicity expenses;

a 1.3%, or R$75 million, increase in depreciation and amortization costs; and

a 4.4%, or R$62 million, increase in taxes and other expenses.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs increased by 2.3% in 2014, primarily as a result of the increase in expenses on Pay-TV content and the implementation of IT projects for the 2014 FIFA World Cup. The effects of these expenditures were partially offset by a decline in expenses on consulting services and lower call center costs as a result of more efficient sales processes.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs increased by 1.3% in 2014, primarily as a result of the growth of our 4G network, which has increased the amount of our amortizable license costs and depreciable property, plant and equipment.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs increased by 47.2% in 2014, primarily as a result of (1) an increase in rental costs relating to our network infrastructure as a result of our sale of non-strategic assets, including GlobeNet, fixed-line communications towers and mobile communications towers, (2) an increase in rental expenses relating to our leasing of capacity on the SES-6 satellite in order to provide our own head-end DTH services within Brazil, and (3) annual contractual adjustments under our other rental agreements.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) increased by 11.6% in 2014, primarily as a result of an increase in the number of our employees as a result of our internalizing a portion of our plant maintenance operations in 2013, and increases in the compensation of some of our employees as a result of the renegotiation of some of our collective bargaining agreements at the end of 2013.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 32.2%, primarily as a result of the 25% decline in VU-M interconnection tariffs that was mandated for February 2014 and the decline in off-net mobile voice traffic, which reflects the success of our offers that incentivize on-net traffic.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 17.4% in 2014, primarily as a result of (1) our internalizing a portion of our plant maintenance operations in 2013; and (2) actions taken to support our commitment to enhance efficiency and productivity and procedures that we adopted to reduce costs.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses increased by 4.4% in 2014, primarily as a result of a R$60 million increase in PIS and COFINS taxes recorded on the increased distributions of interest on shareholders equity received from some of our subsidiaries.

Contingencies

Contingencies increased by 18.6% in 2014, primarily as a result of a R$116 million increase in labor provisions in 2014, compared to a R$154 million reversal of labor provisions in 2013, principally due to our revision of the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in labor lawsuits. These effects were partially offset by a decline in provision for civil claims to R$340 million in 2014 from R$528 million in 2013, primarily due to revision in 2014 of the methodology we use to calculate the provisions for losses in civil lawsuits (principally, lawsuits involving the financial participation agreements), including statistical techniques as a result of the greater experience that we have accumulated in this matter.

Costs of Handsets and Accessories

Costs of handsets and accessories increased by 41.7% in 2014, primarily as a result of the increase in sale of smartphones as part of our strategic initiative to increase our mobile data communications revenue.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses increased by 21.2% in 2014, primarily as a result of increased costs of advertising campaigns related to our Oi TV service, and costs of advertising campaigns related to our sponsorship of the 2014 FIFA World Cup.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for doubtful accounts declined by 29.6% in 2014, primarily as a result of the improvement of our credit policy as part of measures we adopted to lower our churn rate and improve the quality of our customer base. During the year ended December 31, 2014, allowance for doubtful accounts represented 2.3% of our net operating revenue compared to 3.2% in 2013.

Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating income (expenses), net increased by 37.0% to R$3,246 million in 2014 from R$2,370 million in 2013. The principal components of other operating income (expenses), net in 2014 were:

a R$2,399 million gain, net of transaction expenses, relating to the sale of Caryopoceae and Tupã Torres which owned an aggregate of 3,648 mobile communications towers used in our mobile services business;

a R$355 million reversal of allowance arising from our review of the methodology used to calculate allowances for losses on corporate processes; and

a R$476 million reversal of the allowance relating to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program as a result of our settlement of a portion of our obligations for principal, interest and fines utilizing tax loss carryforwards.

The principal components of other operating income (expenses), net in 2013 were:

a R$1,497 million gain, net of transaction expenses, relating to the sale of GlobeNet;

a R$330 million reversal of accrued profit sharing;

a R$201 million reversal of allowance arising from our review of the methodology used to calculate provisions for losses on labor claims; and

a R$173 million gain, net of transaction expenses, related to the sale of a property.

Operating Income before Financial Income (Expenses) and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, our consolidated operating income before financial income (expenses) and taxes increased by 7.3% to R$5,675 million in 2014 from R$5,287 million in 2013. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating income before financial income (expenses) and taxes increased to 20.1% in 2014 from 18.6% in 2013.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income declined by 2.2% to R$1,345 million in 2014 from R$1,375 million in 2013, primarily due to:

a 36.2% decline in other financial income to R$162 million in 2014 from R$254 million in 2013;

a 59.0% decline in dividends received to R$32 million in 2014 from R$78 million in 2013; and

a 53.4% decline in exchange rate gains on foreign investments to R$32 million during 2014 from R$70 million during 2013, primarily as a result of a decrease in our balances invested in foreign currencies and the 13.4% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2014 compared to the 14.6% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2013.

The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) a 27.3% increase in income from short-term investments to R$355 million during 2014 from R$279 million during 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in the average amount of our short-term investments, and (2) a 9.8% increase in interest and inflation adjustments on other assets to R$762 million during 2014 from R$695 million during 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in average amount of our other assets.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses increased by 26.0% to R$5,893 in 2014 from R$4,677 million in 2013, primarily due to:

a 63.1% decline in gains on derivatives transactions to R$427 million during 2014 from R$1,159 million during 2013, primarily as a result of the 13.4% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the stability of therealagainst the Euro during 2014 compared to the 14.6% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the 19.7% depreciation of thereal against the Euro during 2013;

a 19.6% increase in interest on loans payable to third parties and interest on debentures to R$2,933 million during 2014 from R$2,452 million during 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in the average amount of our loans payable to third parties and debentures;

a 26.6% increase in interest and inflation adjustments on other liabilities to R$814 million during 2014 from R$643 million during 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in average amount of our other liabilities; and

a 99.9% increase in withholding income tax on financial transactions and charges R$386 million during 2014 from R$193 million during 2013, primarily as a result of our incurrence of these expenses in connection with the Oi capital increase.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by a 27.2% decline in inflation adjustment and exchange differences on third party borrowing to R$1,465 million during 2014 from R$2,013 million during 2013, primarily as a result of the 13.4% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the stability of therealagainst the Euro during 2014 compared to the 14.6% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the 19.7% depreciation of thereal against the Euro during 2013.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% in each of 2014 and 2013. Income tax and social contribution expense increased by 889.8% to R$758 million in 2014 from R$77 million in 2013. Our effective tax rate was 1,179.5% in 2014 and 11.2% in 2013. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2014  2013 

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

   34.0  34.0

Tax effects of valuation allowance

   (9.1  10.1  

Tax effects of differentiated tax rates

   37.0    1.9  

Tax effects of permanent additions

   1,071.3    11.2  

Tax effects of permanent exclusions

   (585.3  (41.2

Tax effect of REFIS permanent additions

   689.7    —    

Tax incentives (SUDENE)

   (56.4  (4.6

Tax amnesty program

   —      —    

Tax effects of other

   (1.8  (0.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective rate

   1,179.5  11.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our effective tax rate was 1,179.5% in 2014, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effect of permanent additions related to the write-off of R$266 million of tax credits related to potential loss on the shares of Pharol held by Telemar, which increased our effective tax rate by 1,071.3%, and (2) the tax effect of REFIS permanent additions related to the settlement of principal, fines and interest in amount of R$443 million payable to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program through the use of tax loss carryforwards as permitted by Article 2 of Law 12996/2014 and Article 33 of Law 13043/2014, which increased our effective tax rate by 689.7%. The effect of these factors was partially offset by the tax effect of REFIS permanent exclusion related to the settlement of principal, fines and interest in amount of R$219 million payable to the Brazilian government’s tax refinancing program through the use of tax loss carryforwards, which reduced our effective tax rate.

Our effective tax rate was 11.2% in 2013, primarily as a result of the tax effect of permanent exclusions, primarily as a result of prescribed dividends and other permanent exclusions, which decreased our effective tax rate by 41.2%. The effect of these factors was partially offset by (1) the tax effect of permanent additions, primarily as a result of non-deductible fines, tax incentives and sponsorships, which increased our effective tax rate by 11.2%, and (2) the tax effect of valuation allowance, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$69 million and increased our effective tax rate by 10.1%.

Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

Our net loss from continuing operations was R$695 million in 2014 compared to net income from continuing operations of R$604 million in 2013. As a percentage of net operating revenue, net loss from continuing operations was 2.5% in 2014 compared to net loss from continuing operations of 2.1% in 2013.

Net Loss from Discontinued Operations

Net loss from discontinued operations in 2014 of R$4,086 million consisted of (1) the allowance for loss in the amount of R$3,836 million on the investment of PT Portugal resulting from the recognition of assets of PT Portugal at fair value, less selling expenses, and (2) loss from discontinued operations of PT Portugal in the amount of R$250 million.

Net Income

As a result of the foregoing, we recorded profit of R$24,616 million during 2018 compared to a consolidated net loss of R$4,7806,656 million during 2014 compared to consolidated net income of income R$604 million during 2013.2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our net lossprofit was 16.9%111.6% during 20142018 compared to net incomea loss of 2.1% in 201328.0% during 2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal cash requirements consisthave historically consisted of the following:

 

working capital requirements;

servicing of our indebtedness;

 

capital expenditures related to investments in operations, expansion of our networks and enhancements of the technical capabilities and capacity of our networks; and

 

dividends on our shares, including in the form of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity.

UnlessUnder ourby-laws, unless our board of directors deems it inconsistent with our financial position, payment of dividends is mandatorymandatory. Notwithstanding the requirements of ourby-laws, under our by-lawsSection 10.1 of the RJ Plan, Oi and consequently, may give risethe other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to significant cash requirementstheir shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until the sixth anniversary of the date of the Brazilian Confirmation Date. After the sixth anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if the ratio of Oi’s consolidated net debt (defined as Financial Credits, minus Cash Balance (in each case as defined in future periods.the RJ Plan)) to EBITDA (as defined in the RJ Plan) for the fiscal year ended immediately prior to any such declaration or payment is less than or equal to 2 to 1. The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described in this paragraph are subject to certain exceptions, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described above are subject to the following exceptions:

dividends, return on capital or other distributions made between the RJ Debtors;

payments by Oi and the other RJ Debtors to dissenting shareholders, according to applicable law, carried out after the Brazilian Confirmation Date; and

any payment of dividends made in accordance with the RJ Plan.

There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits.

Pursuant to Section 10.2.1 of the RJ Plan, if at any time any two of Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch rate Oi as investment grade and no default occurs, the restrictions on distributions imposed by Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan will be suspended. However, if one of these rating agencies, or both of them, subsequently cancels or downgrades Oi’s rating, then the suspended restrictions will be reinstated.

Our principal sources of liquidity have traditionally consisted of the following:

 

cash flows from operating activities;

 

short-term and long-term loans; and

 

sales of debt securities in domestic and international capital markets; andmarkets.

during 2012, 2013 and 2014, sales of non-core assets.

During 2015, our operations generated negative cash flows of R$1,054 million. As a result of the commencement of our RJ Proceedings in June 2016, our access to short-term and long-term loans and our ability to sell debt securities in domestic and international capital markets was substantially curtailed. However, in February 2020, we financedreturned to the domestic capital markets with the subscription of an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures.

Our operations generated cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 of R$2,312 million, R$2,863 million and R$4,402 million, respectively. Our capital expenditures during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were R$7,426 million, R$5,246 million and R$4,344 million, respectively. We believe that our continued program of capital expenditures is necessary in order for us to operate in the competitive environment for telecommunications services in Brazil. As our cash flow generated from our operations has not been sufficient to meet the demands of our investing and financing activities, our balances of cash and cash equivalents have declined as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

As of December 31, 2019, our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and cash investments amounted to R$2,266 million. As of December 31, 2019, we had working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities, excluding assetsheld-for-sale and liabilities ofassets-held-for-sale) of R$2,261 million.

Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we generated cash flows from investing activities debt servicethrough the sale on January 24, 2020 by Africatel of all of its shares in PT Ventures for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion and working capitalwe generated cash flows from financing activities through the subscription in February 2020 of an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures.

We anticipate that we will be required to spend approximately R$7,358 million to meet our long-term contractual obligations and commitments during the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021. We expect to use proceeds from our sale ofnon-core assets, including the sale of PT Ventures and the sale of our property in Botafogo, proceeds from borrowings from Brazilian and international financial institutions under new export credit facilities, proceeds from Oi Mobile’s sale of itsnon-convertible debentures, together with our operating cash flows and our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments. Asinvestments to fund our capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to seek to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities. In the absence of December 31, 2015,funds obtained under new credit export facilities and from additionalnon-core asset sales, we may have insufficient funds to implement our consolidatedcapital expenditure program and modernize our infrastructure, which could result in a significant deterioration of our ability to generate cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments amounted to R$16,700 million. As of December 31, 2015, we had working capital of R$12,609 million, which includes net assets and liabilities held for sale of R$6,941 million.flows from operating activities.

OurWe have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements forunder the year ended December 31, 2015 have been prepared assumingassumption that we will continue as a going concern based on our cash flow projections.and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. See”— Financial Presentation and Accounting Policies— Presentation of Financial Statements.” Our projections depend on factors such as attainment of traffic volume targets, customer base, launching of bundled products attractive to customers, service sales prices, foreign exchange fluctuationcompany has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the success of the effortsRJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to identify and implement financial and strategic alternativesour ability to optimize the liquidity and debt profile.continue as a going concern.

Should one or moreAs of the assumptions underlyingdate of this annual report, we have not been able to quantify any material impacts related toCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our cash flow projectionsoperations and other forecasts orsales, particularly our FTTH network expansion. For more details see “—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of the outcomeCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the effortsdepreciation of thereal subsequent to identifyDecember 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and implement financialthe public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and strategic alternatives to optimizeinternationally, and the related effects on our liquidityU.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and debt profileinterest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be met, our working capital may not be sufficient for our requirements during 2016.in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

Cash Flow

Cash Flows from Operating ActivitiesThe following table sets forth certain information about our consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Net cash generated (used) in operating activities

  R$2,312  R$2,863  R$4,402 

Net cash (used) generated in investing activities

   (6,851  (4,917  (4,422

Net cash (used) generated in financing activities

   2,236   (424  (692

Foreign exchange differences on cash equivalents

      1   11 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (2,303  (2,477  (701
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

   4,385   6,863   7,563 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

  R$2,082  R$4,385  R$6,863 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our primary source of operating funds has historically been cash flow generated from our operations. However, during 2015, our operations generated negative cash flows of R$1,054 million. As a result, cash flows provided by our operating activities were not sufficient for our cash requirements related to operations. Historically,and we have financed our investments in property, plant and equipment through the use of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing. During 2015,Our access to new funds to finance our investments in property, plant and equipment in the form of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing was substantially curtailed following the commencement of our RJ Proceedings in June 2016. However, in February 2020, we financedreturned to the domestic capital markets with the subscription of an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. As our cash flow generated from our operating activities was not sufficient to meet the demands of our investing and financing activities debt serviceduring 2017 and working capital from2018, our balances of cash and cash equivalents declined as of December 31, 2018 and short-term2017. As our cash investments.flow generated from our operating and financing activities were not sufficient to meet the demands of our investing activities, our balances of cash and cash equivalents declined as of December 31, 2019.

Net cash usedCash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

Cash Flows Provided by operating activities was R$1,054 million during 2015, after giving effect to net cash provided by discontinued operations of R$485 million. Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$5,5312,312 million during 2014, including cash flow from discontinued operationsthe year ended December 31, 2019 compared to loss before taxes of R$1,8789,087 million, and R$7,035 million during 2013.

The R$6,584 million deterioration of our operating cash flows during 2015 was primarily as a result of:

a R$4,792 million increase in net loss to R$9,572 million during 2015 from R$4,780 million during 2014;

the effects of a R$5,371 million increase in non-cash gains from financial derivative transactions to R$5,796 million during 2015 from R$425 million during 2014 as a result of the decline in the value of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the Euro during 2015, particularly during the second half of 2015;

the effects of a 78.8%, or R$3,219 million, decline in net income of discontinued operations, net of tax, to R$867 million during 2015 from R$4,086 million during 2014, as described under the caption “—Results of Operations—Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2014—Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations”;

the effects of a 74.2% decline in operating cash flows generated by discontinued operations to R$485 million during 2015 from R$1,878 during 2014, primarily as a result of our recording PT Portugal as discontinued operations for eight months during 2015 compared to five months during 2014; and

(1) the effects of a R$1,100 decline in cash flows related to investments in held-for-trading short-term investments, netour incurrence of redemptions, to a net outflownon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$8326,874 million, during 2015 from a net inflow(2) the effects of our incurrence of losses onnon-cash charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and exchange differences of R$2683,607 million, during 2014.

These(3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash impairment losses of R$2,111 million, (4) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash inflation adjustments to provisions of R$1,620 million, (5) the effects of an increase of R$1,322 million of other taxes on our balance sheet, (6) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash onerous obligations of R$1,231 million, and (7) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash present value adjustments to other liabilities of R$1,018 million. The effects of these factors reducing our operating cash flows were partially offset by:

by the effects of a 391.4%, or R$5,131 million increase in our incurrence ofnon-cash gains from interest loss on financial instruments to R$6,443 million during 2015 from R$1,311 million during 2014; and

the effects of a R$2,462 million increase in non-cash deferred income tax expenses to R$2,598 million during 2015 from R$136 million during 2014.

Operating cash flow declined by 21.4%, or R$1,505 million, to R$5,531 million during 2014 from R$7,035 million during 2013, primarily as a result of:

our net lossrecoveries of R$4,780 million during 2014, compared to our net income of R$604 million during 2013;

the effects of a R$1,705 decrease in cash flows related to investments in held-for-trading short-term investments, net of redemptions, to a net inflow of R$268 million during 2014 from a net inflow of R$1,973 million during 2013; and

the effects of a R$1,613 million change in cash flows from accounts receivable to a net increase of R$1,057 million during 2014 from a net decline of R$556 million during 2013.

These factors reducing our operating cash flows were partially offset by:

3,618 million.

the effects of a our recording net income of discontinued operations, net of tax, of R$4,086 million during 2014 as a result of our classification of PT Portugal as discontinued operations;

the effects of a our recording operating cash flows generated by discontinued operations of R$1,878 million during 2014 as a result of our classification of PT Portugal as discontinued operations; and

the effects of a 78.5%, or R$1,215 million, decline in non-cash gains classified as “other” to R$332 million during 2014 from R$1,547 million during 2013.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Investing activities provided net cash of R$12,543 million during 2015, giving effect to netNet cash used by discontinued operations ofinvesting activities was R$195 million, and used net cash of R$4,3036,851 million during 2014, including cash used by discontinued operationsthe year ended December 31, 2019, primarily consisting of R$2,813 million, and R$6,770 million during 2013.

During 2015, investing activities of our continuing operations which provided cash primarily consisted of our sale of PT Portugal which generated cash of R$17,218 million. During 2015, investing activities of our continuing operations for which we used cash primarily consisted of (1) investments of R$3,6817,426 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the implementationquality and capacity of projectsour network in order to meet ANATEL’s regulatory requirements,promote more efficient operational performance and (2)improvements in service quality and customer experience, the effects of which were partially offset by (1) our realizing net redemption of judicial deposits (consisting of deposits less redemptions) of R$1,006242 million, (2) our receipt of dividends of R$227 million from Unitel, and (3) our receipt of proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles of R$106 million, primarily related to provisionsa R$67 million gain on our sale of our interest in CVTelecom in May 2019.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Financing activities provided net cash of R$2,236 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily consisting of the R$4,000 million proceeds of our issuance and sale of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares, the effects of which were partially offset by our incurrence of R$1,611 million of lease financing costs.

Cash Flows for labor,the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$2,863 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to profit before taxes of R$21,341 million, primarily as a result of (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash adjustment to fair value of our borrowings and civil contingencies.financings of R$13,929 million, (2) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash gain on restructuring of third-party borrowings of R$11,055, (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash gains on charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and exchange differences of R$2,043 million, and (4) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash present value adjustments to other liabilities of R$1,167 million.

During 2014,The effects of these factors were partially offset by (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$5,811 million, and (2) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash losses on onerous obligations of R$4,884 million.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities of our continuing operations for which we used cashwas R$4,917 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily consistedconsisting of (1) investments of R$5,3705,246 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the acquisitionquality and capacity of our 4G authorizationnetwork in order to promote more efficient operational performance and the implementation of projects to meet ANATEL’s regulatory requirements,improvements in service quality and (2)customer experience.

Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities

Financing activities used net judicial deposits (consisting of deposits less redemptions)cash of R$938424 million primarily related to provisions for labor, taxes and civil contingencies. During 2014, investing activities generated cash flows of (1) R$4,454 million fromduring the sale of permanent assets,year ended December 31, 2018, primarily consisting of cash used (1) to make installment payments under our tax refinancing plan in the net proceedsaggregate amount of R$265 million, and (2) to repay principal of R$162 million related to the mediation of payments of our salesborrowings and financing as a result of GlobeNet, Caryopoceae,the RJ Proceedings.

Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$4,402 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to loss before taxes of R$5,558 million, primarily as a result of (1) the effects of our incurrence of non-cash provisions for contingencies of R$7,362 million, (2) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash losses on charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and Tupã Torres,exchange differences of R$5,120 million, and (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$5,109 million.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash present value adjustments to other liabilities of R$4,873 million, and (2) R$357 million from the acquisitioneffects of PT Portugal, netour incurrence ofnon-cash reversals of impairment losses of R$4,747 million.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash and cash equivalents of assets classified as held-for sale.

During 2013,used by investing activities forwas R$4,422 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2017, investing activities which we used cash primarily consisted of (1) investments of R$5,9764,344 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the acquisitionquality and capacity of our 4G authorizationnetwork in order to promote more efficient operational performance and the implementation of projects to meet ANATEL’s regulatory requirements,improvements in service quality and (2) net judicial deposits (consisting of deposits less redemptions) of R$735 million, primarily related to provisions for labor, taxes and civil contingencies.customer experience.

Cash Flows fromUsed in Financing Activities

Financing activities used net cash of R$2,357692 million during 2015, including cash used by discontinued operations of R$492 million, used net cash of R$1,175 million during 2014, including cash used by discontinued operations of R$5,533 million, and R$2,299 million during 2013.

the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2015, our principal sources of borrowed funds consisted of (1) the issuance of €600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2021, (2) US$700 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under a US$1,000 million revolving credit facility that Oi entered into with a syndicate financials institution during 2011, (3) US$600 million aggregate principal amount under an export credit facility that Telemar entered into with China Development Bank during 2015, (4) US$141 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under a US$397 million export credit facility agreement that Oi entered into during 2014 that is guaranteed by Finnvera plc, the Finnish Export Credit Agency, or FINNVERA, (5) US$43 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under a US$257 million export credit facility agreement that Oi entered into during 2013 that is insured by the Office National Du Ducroire/Nationale Delcrederedienst, the Belgian national export credit agency, or ONDD, and (6) US$33 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under a US$600 million export credit facility that Telemar entered into with China Development Bank, or CDB, during 2015.

During 2015,2017, we used cash principally (1) to (1) repay R$8,604 million principal amountpurchase the remaining 50% of our outstanding loans and financings and derivatives, (2) to make installment payments relating to our permits and concessions in the

aggregate amount shares of R$349 million, and (3) to make installment payments under the tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$93 million.

During 2014, our principal sources of borrowed funds consisted of (1) R$1,300 million aggregate principal amount under a revolving credit facilityRio Alto that we entered into with a syndicate financials institution during December 2012, (2)did not own for R$836300 million, aggregate principal amount borrowed under a credit facility with the Brazilian National Development Bank (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social), or BNDES that we entered into in December 2012, (3) US$104 million aggregate principal amount under an export credit facility that Telemar entered into with Export Development Canada, or EDC, during July 2012, and (4) US$98 million aggregate principal amount under an export credit facility that Oi entered into during March 2013. In addition, we generated cash (net of issue premium and related costs) of R$7,827 million through our sale of common shares and preferred shares for cash in the Oi capital increase.

During 2014, in addition to the R$5,533 million used by discontinued operations, we used cash to (1) repay R$5,054 million principal amount of our outstanding loans and financings and derivatives, (2) to make installment payments under the tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$870227 million, and (3) to make installment payments relating to our permits and concessions in the aggregate amount of R$205104 million.

During 2013, our principal sources of borrowed funds consisted of (1) R$1,500 million aggregate principal amount of non-convertible debentures issued in March 2013, (2) R$873.5 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under a R$5.4 billion credit facility with BNDES that we entered into in December 2012, (3) US$96 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under an export credit facility that Telemar entered into with EDC in July 2012, and (4) US$37 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under an export credit facility that Telemar entered into in July 2011.

During 2013, we used cash to (1) repay R$3,568 million principal amount of our outstanding loans and financings and derivatives, (2) to make installment payments relating to our permits and concessions in the aggregate amount of R$711 million, (3) to pay dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity in the aggregate amount of R$1,280 million, and (4) to make installment payments under the tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$174 million.

Projected Sources and Uses of Cash

We anticipate that we will be required to spend approximately R$19,725 million to meet our short-term contractual obligations and commitments during 2016, and an additional approximately R$30,672 million to meet our long-term contractual obligations and commitments in 2017 and 2018.

As of December 31, 2015, our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments amounted to R$16,700 million. We expect to use our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments, and financing for which we have commitments under facilities from CDB and Banco do Nordeste do Brasil S/A, or BNB, to fund our operations, investments, debt service obligations and working capital requirements during the period in which our operating cash flows are insufficient to fund these cash requirements.

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

Our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, based on our cash flow projections. Our projections depend on factors such as attainment of traffic volume targets, customer base, launching of bundled products attractive to customers, service sales prices, foreign exchange fluctuation and the success of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize the liquidity and debt profile.

Should one or more of the assumptions underlying our cash flow projections and other forecasts or the outcome of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile not be met, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments, together with our committed financing, may not be sufficient to meet our contractual obligations and commitments during 2016.

We have a commitment from CDB to provide us with financing in the future under a credit facility described under “—Indebtedness.” In addition, we have an undrawn credit facility with BNB as described below. We pay commitment fees to these financial institutions in connection with their commitments.

In December 2014, Oi Mobile entered into a credit agreement with BNB, under which BNB agreed to disburse a loan in the aggregate principal amount of up to R$370 million. The proceeds of this loan agreement may be used to fund equipment purchase and expenditures on our fixed-line and mobile telecommunication infrastructure in the Brazilian states of the northeastern region. Loans under this agreement bear interest at a rate of 7.06% per annum over the principal amount of BRL 37 million and 8.24% per annum over the principal amount of BRL 333 million. Interest on each of these loans is payable quarterly in the first two years and monthly thereafter until the final maturity of the debt. The outstanding principal amount of these loans is payable in 72 successive monthly installments commencing in January, 2017. As of December 31, 2015, we had not borrowed any amounts under this facility.

Contractual Commitments

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2015:2019:

 

   Payments Due by Period 
   Less than
One Year
   One to
Three Years
   Three to
Five Years
   More than
Five Years
   Total 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Continuing operations:

          

Loans and financings (1)

  R$15,282    R$24,998    R$16,894    R$6,243    R$63,417  

Debentures (2)

   1,622     4,170     17     —       5,809  

Unconditional purchase obligations (3)

   1,477     758     343     —       2,578  

Concession fees (4)

   288     306     348     1,437     2,379  

Usage rights (5)

   912     7     —       —       919  

Pension plan contributions (6)

   144     433     289     577     1,443  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  R$19,725    R$30,672    R$17,891    R$8,257    R$76,545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Payments Due by Period 
   Less than
One Year
   One to
Three Years
   Three to
Five Years
   More than
Five Years
   Total 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Borrowings and financings(1)

   R$679    R$3,312    R$11,317    R$27,113    R$42,421 

Lease liabilities

   1,510    4,224    2,474    7,275    15,483 

Pension plan payables(2)

       201    402    603    1,206 

Other payables(2)

   442    885    137    11,711    13,175 

Unconditional purchase obligations(3)

   1,433                1,433 

Concession fees(4)

       397    235    261    893 

Usage rights(5)

   59                59 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   R$4,123    R$9,019    R$14,565    R$46,963    R$74,670 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes (1) estimated future payments of interest on our loansborrowings and financings, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates applicable at December 31, 20152019 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loansborrowings and financings will be made on their scheduled payment dates and (2) estimated futurethat we elect to pay cash flows on our derivative obligations, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange ratesfor all applicable as of December 31, 2015 and assuming that all payments on our derivative obligations will be made on their scheduled payment dates.periods under the PIK Toggle Notes.

(2)Includes

Cash flow estimated future payments of interest on our debentures, calculated based on interest rates applicable as of December 31, 2015 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our debentures will be made on their scheduled payment dates.in connection with the RJ Plan.

(3)

Consists of (1) obligations in connection with a business process outsourcing agreement, and (2) purchase obligations for network equipment pursuant to binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

(4)

Consists of estimatedbi-annual fees due to ANATEL under our concession agreements expiring in 2025. These estimated amounts are calculated based on our results for the year ended December 31, 2015.2019.

(5)

Consists of payments due to ANATEL for radio frequency licenses. Includes accrued and unpaid interest as of December 31, 2015.

(6)Consists of expected contributions to amortize the actuarial deficit of the BrTPREV plan.2019.

We are also subject to contingencies with respect to tax, civil, labor and other claims and have made provisions for accrued liability for legal proceedings related to certain tax, civil, labor and other claims of R$4,4345,252 million as of December 31, 2015.2019. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and note 2124 to our audited consolidated financial statements.statements included in this annual report.

Indebtedness

On a consolidated basis our Euro-denominated indebtedness as of December 31, 2015 was R$24,222 million,2019, our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness was R$22,7149,210 million, and ourreal-denominated indebtedness was R$12,922 million.8,705 million, and our Euro-denominated indebtedness was R$311 million, in each case after giving effect to the fair value adjustment of our indebtedness. As of December 31, 2015,2019, our Euro-denominatedU.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 5.4% per annum, ourreal-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 5.2% per annum, our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 5.1% per annum, and ourreal-denominated Euro-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 13.3% per annum.does not bear interest. As of December 31, 2015, 33.4%2019, 52.0% of our indebtedness, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment of our indebtedness, debt bore interest at floating rates, including the effect of swap operations.rates.

Short-Term Indebtedness

OurAs of December 31, 2019, our short-term debt, consisting of the current portion of long-term borrowings and financings, was R$11,927326 million, asafter giving effect to the fair value adjustment of December 31, 2015.our indebtedness. Under our financing policy, we generally do not incur short-term indebtedness, as we believe that our cash flows from operations generally will be sufficient to service our current liabilities.indebtedness.

Long-Term Indebtedness

Our principal sources of long-term debtborrowings and financings are:

 

fixed-rate notes issued in the international market;

 

debentures issued in the Brazilian market;

credit facilities with international export credit agencies;

 

credit facilities with BNDES;

unsecured lines of credit obtained fromwith Brazilian and international financial institutions; and

 

credit facilities with BNDES;

debentures issued in the Brazilian market; and

real estate securitization transactions.

Somedefault recoveries owed to holders of some of our novated debt obligations.

Our debt instruments with BNDES require that Oi or Telemar complycomplies with financial covenants annually, semi-annually orrelating to the maintenance of the following ratios on a quarterly the most restrictivebasis:

our ratio of which require Oishareholders’ equity to maintain a consolidatedtotal assets;

our ratio of EBITDA to interest paid on our indebtedness;

our ratio of EBITDA (less taxes) to amortization and interest expense (less short-termyear-end cash);

our ratio of total debt to consolidated EBITDA, determined based on EBITDA; and

our financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, for the prior 12-month period less than or equalratio of short-term debt minus cash to 4.0 to 1.0 at the end of each fiscal quarter until maturity. EBITDA.

Under each of these debt instruments, the creditorBNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the end of any applicable perioddate the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with the defined financial covenants ratios.

In anticipation of the completion of the PT Portugal Disposition, we executed temporary modifications of each of our debt instruments that contains such financial maintenance covenants (other than our debt instruments with BNDES), pursuant to which the consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio that Oi was required to maintain was increased to 6.0 to 1.0 for each of the fiscal quarters of 2015.

Our debt facilities with BNDES contained a number of financial covenants (including ratios with respect to shareholders equity to total assets and consolidated debt to EBITDA) that were measured on a semi-annual basis on June 30 and December 31. Under these debt facilities, noncompliance withany two or more of these covenants in one

semi-annual period would automatically trigger the right of BNDES to retain proceeds (in an amount equivalent to three times our next amortization payment under each debt facility with BNDES) from receivables otherwise payable to us in reserve accounts pledged for the benefit of BNDES until such time as the breach is cured.

On June 30, 2015,ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were not in compliance with the covenants in each of our debt facilities with BNDES that require Oi to maintain a shareholder’s equity to EBITDA ratio of at least 0.25 to 1 and a consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio of less than 4.0 to 1. As a result, BNDES, had the right to retain proceeds from receivables in reserve accounts pledged for the benefit of BNDES, as described above. In November, 2015, we and BNDES amended the terms of each of our debt facilities with BNDES. these financial covenants.

As a result of these amendments, (1) the consolidated debtdepreciation of thereal subsequent to consolidated EBITDA ratio that Oi was required to maintain was increased to 6.0 to 1.0 for the December 31, 2015 measurement date, (2)2019, partially due to the measurement period under eachCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of these debt facilities was reduced to quarterly periods, and (3) BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt under each of these debt facilities, at the end of any applicable period,March 31, 2020, we arewould not be in compliance with two or more of the financial covenants contained in these debt facilities.

Prior to December 31, 2015, we executed temporary modifications of each of our debt instruments that contains covenants requiring Oi to maintain specified levels of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (other than the debt instruments governing Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances of debentures), pursuant to which Oi was required to maintain a consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 6.0one ratio. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES with respect to 1.0the failure to comply with more than one of these ratios as of DecemberMarch 31, 2015. Most of these waivers and amendments continue to require Oi was required to maintain a consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 6.0 to 1.0 for each of the fiscal quarters of 2016. Upon the expiration of these waivers and under the terms of these amendments, the consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio that Oi is required to maintain under each of these debt instruments will be reduced to their pre-existing levels, the most restrictive of which will require that Oi maintain a consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio of less than 4.0 to 1.0. We have repaid the principal amount outstanding under Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances of debentures in the aggregate amount of R$23 million.

Under the amendments to our revolving credit facility, we agreed to additional conditions applicable to further extensions of credit under this facility. All amounts outstanding under this facility were repaid at maturity in January 2016 and we have terminated this facility.

We were in compliance with each of the financial covenants applicable the debt instruments to which Oi and its subsidiaries are a party as of December 31, 2015 (other than the debt instruments governing Oi’s 5th and 9th issuances of debentures). We are seeking waivers from those creditors for which these waivers and amendments do not cover all measurement periods to and including the periods ending on December 31, 2016. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that these waivers will be obtained. In the event that we are unable to obtain waivers of the anticipated breaches of these covenants in these debt instruments, or identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile, we may be unable to meet our obligations under these debt instruments in the event that the creditors under these debt instruments seek to enforce their available remedies.

Under the Trust Deed governing the PTIF Bonds, we were required to file audited financial statements of PTIF as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce no later than January 31, 2016. On April 29, 2016, the PTIF Trustee delivered a written notice to PTIF and Oi noting that the failure of PTIF to provide the 2014 audited financial statements constituted a potential event of default under the PTIF Bonds and requesting the delivery of those financial statements. PTIF is continuing to work with its auditor to complete the preparation of its 2014 audited financial statements as soon as possible.

The PTIF Trustee has notified PTIF that if PTIF fails to deliver the financial statements on or prior to May 29, 2016 and the PTIF Trustee determines that this failure is materially prejudicial to the interests of the holders of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee could declare that the PTIF Bonds are immediately due and repayable. Under the terms of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee is not obliged to exercise its discretion to declare any PTIF Bonds immediately due and repayable or to take any other action to enforce the rights of the holders of the PTIF Bonds unless it shall have been indemnified to its satisfaction and specifically directed or requested to do so by a requisite percentage of the holders of the PTIF Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PTIF Bonds.2020.

The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses instruments governing a substantial portion of our other indebtedness contain cross-acceleration clauses and the occurrence of(other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under one of theseour debt instruments couldwith BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness or those obligations. Were a substantial amount of our outstanding indebtedness to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to repay such debt when due.indebtedness.

As ofAt December 31, 2015,2019, all of our debt instruments with BNDES were secured by pledges of certain of our accounts receivable.

The following discussion briefly describes certainSome of our significant financing transactions.

Fixed-Rate Notes

debt instruments require that Oi or Telemar comply with financial covenants on a quarterly basis. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had 14 series of fixed-rate debt securities that were issued in the international market. All ofcompliance with these securities pay interest semi-annually or annually in arrears.financial covenants.

The following table below sets forth our outstanding fixed-rate debt securitieslong-term borrowings and financings as of December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal amount of these securities and their maturity dates.2019.

 

Security

  Outstanding Principal
Amount
Final Maturity
(in millions)

PTIF 5.625% Notes due 2016(1)

532February 2016

PTIF 6.25% Notes due 2016(1)

232July 2016

Oi 9.75% senior notes due 2016(2)

R$1,055September 2016

PTIF 4.375% Notes due 2017(1)

384March 2017

PTIF 5.242% Notes due 2017(1)

250November 2017

Oi 5.125% senior notes due 2017(3)

578December 2017

PTIF 5.875% Notes due 2018(1)

750April 2018

Oi 9.500% senior notes due 2019(3)

US$138April 2019

PTIF 5.00% Notes due 2019(1)

750November 2019

PTIF 4.625% Notes due 2020(1) IF

1,000May 2020

Oi 5.500% senior notes due 2020(3)

US$1,787October 2020

Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. 5.625% senior notes due 2021(1)

600June 2021

Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. 5.75% senior notes due 2022(1)

US$1,432February 2022

PTIF 4.5% Notes due 2025(1) IF

500June 2025

(1)These notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Oi S.A.
(2)These notes are denominated inreaisand payments of principal and interest under these notes are payable in U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at the time of payment.
(3)These notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Telemar Norte Leste S.A.

Export Credit Agency Credit Facilities

As of December 31, 2015, we had entered into 13 export credit facility agreements under which we have borrowed funds to make equipment purchases related our fixed-line and mobile telecommunications infrastructure. The lender under some of these export credit facility agreements are the export credit agencies. Under the remainder of these export credit facility agreements, the export credit agencies have guaranteed or insured our obligations to the lenders, which are international financial institutions. Interest these export credit facility agreements is payable semi-annually in arrears and principal amortizes in equal semi-annual installments through maturity.

The following table sets forth our outstanding export credit facility agreements as of December 31, 2015, the export credit agency, the borrower under the facility, the outstanding principal amount, the interest rate, the number of remaining amortization payments and the final maturity dates.

Export Credit Agency

  Borrower  Outstanding
Principal
Amount
   Interest Rate  Number of
Remaining
Amortization
Payments
  Final Maturity
      (in US$
millions)
          

China Development Bank (2009)(1)

   Telemar   US$27     LIBOR plus 2.50  1   February 2016

China Development Bank (2009)

   Telemar    53     LIBOR plus 2.50  2   October 2016

China Development Bank (2015)(2)

   Telemar(3)   600     LIBOR plus 1.90  5(4)  December 2020

China Development Bank (2015)(5)

   Telemar(3)   33     LIBOR plus 2.00  14(6)  June 2025

FINNVERA (2008)

   Telemar(3)   106     LIBOR plus 1.07  6   December 2018

FINNVERA (2009)

   Telemar(3)   235     LIBOR plus 1.70  8   August 2019

FINNVERA (2011)

   Telemar    129     LIBOR plus 0.90  11   February 2021

FINNVERA (2014):

       

Tranche A

   Oi    123     LIBOR plus 1.00  14   November 2022

Tranche B

   Oi    0     LIBOR plus 1.00  16   November 2023

ONDD (2010):

       

Tranche A

   Telemar    36     LIBOR plus 1.40  8   August 2019

Tranche B

   Telemar    84     LIBOR plus 1.40  10   August 2020

ONDD (2013):

       

Tranche A

   Oi    81     LIBOR plus 1.50  13   March 2023

Tranche B

   Oi    40     LIBOR plus 1.50  15   March 2024

Export Development Canada (2012)

   Telemar    153     2.25  13   May 2022

EKN (2011): (7)

       June 2021

Tranche A

   Telemar    22     2.21  7   February 2020

Tranche B

   Telemar    40     2.21  9   February 2021

Nordic Development Bank (2008)

   Telemar    35     LIBOR plus 1.18  6   July 2018

(1)All amounts outstanding under this facility were paid at maturity in February 2016.
(2)The proceeds of this credit facility were required to be used to pay up to 70% of the existing financial indebtedness due and payable by Oi or Telemar since January 1, 2015 and through December 2016.
(3)The obligations under this credit export facility agreement are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Oi S.A.
(4)The outstanding principal amount of these loans is payable in four unequal semi-annual installments commencing in April 2019 with a final payment upon maturity in December 2020.
(5)An additional US$568 million is available for disbursement under this facility.
(6)The outstanding principal amount of these loans is payable in 13 unequal semi-annual installments commencing in April 2019 with a final payment upon maturity in June 2025.
(7)All amounts outstanding under this facility were paid in April 2016 pursuant to a requirement that we prepay all outstanding amounts in the event that our credit rating was downgraded below Ba2 by Moody’s or BB by Fitch.

Unsecured Lines of Credit

In May 2008, Telemar entered into an unsecured line of credit with a Brazilian financial institution in the aggregate amount of R$4,300 million to finance the acquisition of control of Oi. The loans under this line of credit originally bore interest at the rate of the CDI rate plus 1.30% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears in May and November of each year, commencing in May 2010. As a result of the renegotiation of the terms and conditions of these loans in May 2011, these loans bear interest at the rate of the CDI rate plus 1.00% per annum from May 2011 to May 2014 and at the rate of CDI rate plus 1.83% per annum from May 2014 to May 2018. The principal of these loans is payable in seven equal annual installments, commencing in May 2010. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal amount under this line of credit was R$2,304 million.

In November 2011, Oi, Oi Mobile, Telemar and TNL PCS entered together into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of international institutions. As a result of the merger of TNL PCS with and into Oi Mobile in February 2014, Oi Mobile assumed all of TNL PCS’s rights and obligations under this credit facility. Under this facility, up to US$1 billion aggregate principal amount will be available for disbursement to the borrowers during the five-year term of this facility. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal amount under this revolving credit facility was US$700 million. As of the date of this annual report, all amounts outstanding under this revolving credit facility have been repaid and this facility has been terminated.

Credit Facilities with BNDES

We and our subsidiaries have entered into a variety of credit facilities with BNDES. The proceeds of these credit facilities have been used for a variety of purposes, including funding our investment plans, funding the expansion of our telecommunications plant (voice, data and video), and making operational improvements to meet the targets established in the General Plan on Universal Service Goals and the General Plan on Quality Goals in effect at the time of these loans.

The following table sets forth selected information with respect to our BNDES credit facilities as of December 31, 2015.

Facility

  Outstanding
Principal
Amount
   Interest Rate  Amortization
Schedule
  Final Maturity
   (in millions
of
reais)
          

Oi Mobile 2009 credit facility(1):

      

Floating-rate loans

   71     TJLP plus 3.95  Monthly(2)  December 2018

Fixed-rate loans

   16     4.50  Monthly(2)  December 2018

2012 credit facility:

      

Oi A loans

   360     TJLP plus 4.08  Monthly(3)  July 2021

Oi B loans

   49     2.50  Monthly(3)  January 2021

Oi C loans

   157     2.50  Monthly(3)  January 2021

Telemar A loans

   678     TJLP plus 4.08  Monthly(3)  July 2021

Telemar B loans

   109     2.50  Monthly(3)  January 2021

Telemar D loans

   71     TJLP plus 2.18  Monthly(3)  January 2021

Telemar E loans

   6     TJLP    Monthly(3)  January 2021

Oi Mobile A loans(4)

   398     TJLP plus 4.08  Monthly(3)  July 2021

Oi Mobile B loans(4)

   96     2.50  Monthly(3)  January 2021

Oi Mobile C loans(4)

   29     2.50  Monthly(3)  January 2021

(1)Represents four separate facilities. On September 30, 2013, the obligations of Telemar under its 2009 Credit Facility and the obligations of Oi under its 2009 Credit Facility were assumed by TNL PCS, in each case with the consent of BNDES. As a result of the merger of TNL PCS with and into Oi Mobile in February 2014, Oi Mobile assumed TNL PCS’s obligations under this credit facility and the obligations of TNL PCS under its 2009 Credit Facility.
(2)Amortization on this facility commenced in January 2012.
(3)Amortization on this facility commenced in August 2015.
(4)As a result of the merger of TL PCS with and into Oi Mobile in February 2014, Oi Mobile assumed TNL PCS’s obligations under this credit facility.

Debentures

We have issued several series of debentures in the Brazilian market. All of these securities pay interest annually or semi-annually in arrears. The table below sets forth our outstanding debentures as of December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal amount of these securities, the applicable interest rates, and their maturity dates.

Security

Outstanding Principal
Amount
Interest Rate  Final Maturity
   (in millions
of
reais)
   

Oi 9th issuance; 1st series (1)

R$10CDI plus 0.94March 2017

Oi 8th issuancePIK Toggle Notes

   2,350R$6,981  CDI plus 1.15December 2018(2)July 2025

Oi 1012th issuance of debentures

   1,5004,565  CDI plus 0.75March 2019February 2035

Oi 9Telemar 6th issuance; 2nd series (1)issuance of debentures

   432,546  IPCA plus 6.20March 2020(3)February 2035

Oi 5th issuance; 2nd series (1)Restructured Export Credit Agreements(1)

   66,726  IPCA plus 7.98April 2020February 2035

Telemar 2nd issuanceRestructured BNDES credit agreements

   313,947  February 2033
IPCA plus 0.50

Restructured Brazilian credit agreements and CRIs

  July 20212,029February 2035

Non-Qualified Credit Agreement

360February 2030

Local currency financial institution

42November 2026

Default Recovery in Reais

207February 2042

Default Recovery in foreign currency

4,239February 2042

Total gross borrowings and financing

31,642

Incurred debt issuance costs

(14

Fair value adjustment

(13,401

Short-term portion

(326

Long-term indebtedness

R$17,900

 

(1)All outstanding amounts under these debentures were prepaid in April 2016.
(2)The outstanding principal amount of these debentures is payable in three equal annual installments in December 2016, 2017 and 2018.
(2)The outstanding principal amount of these debentures is payable in two equal annual installments in March 2019 and 2020.

Represents four Restructured Export Credit Agreements.

The following discussion briefly describes certain of our significant outstanding indebtedness.

Real Estate Securitization TransactionPIK Toggle Notes

InThe PIK Toggle Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Oi denominated in U.S. dollars that mature in July 2025, with the principal amount to be fully paid at maturity. The PIK Toggle Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF. The PIK Toggle Notes accrued and will accrue interest from February 5, 2018 until August 2010,5, 2020 at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum, payable in cash. Interest on the PIK Toggle Notes will thereafter accrue as follows:

from August 5, 2020 until August 5, 2021, at either (at the sole discretion of Oi): (1) a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis, or (2) a fixed rate of 12.0% per annum, of which 8.0% shall be payable in cash and 4.0% shall be payable by either increasing the principal amount of the outstanding PIK Toggle Notes or by issuingpaid-in-kind notes, at the sole discretion of Oi, in each case, on a semi-annual basis; and

thereafter, at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis.

Oi 12th Issuance of Debentures

Oi has issued its 12th issuance of simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures. These debentures are denominated in reais. The principal amount of these debentures will be paid in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2035. The principal amount of these debentures will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these debentures on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Oi’s obligations under these debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, transferred 162Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

Telemar 6th Issuance of Debentures

Telemar has issued its 6th issuance, simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures. These debentures are denominated inreais. The principal amount of these debentures will be paid in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2035. The principal amount of these debentures will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these debentures on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Telemar’s obligations under these debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

Restructured Export Credit Agreements

Oi has entered into one export credit agreement and Telemar has entered into three separate export credit agreements, which we refer to collectively as the Restructured Export Credit Agreements, documenting the recoveries due to the lenders under our novated export credit agreements. The obligations under the Restructured Export Credit Agreements are senior unsecured obligations of Oi and Telemar, respectively, denominated in U.S. dollars that mature in February 2035. Principal under each of the Restructured Export Credit Agreements is payable in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in the August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the principal amount for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the principal amount for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity. Principal under each of the Restructured Export Credit Agreements accrues interest at the rate of 1.75% per annum. Interest will be capitalized on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Oi’s obligations under its Restructured Export Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar and Oi Mobile, and Telemar’s obligations under its Restructured Export Credit Agreements are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Oi and Oi Mobile.

Restructured BNDES Credit Agreements

By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the credit agreements between BNDES and each of Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile were novated and BNDES is entitled to receive as recovery for its claims under these credit facilities payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims inreais, adjusted by the interest/inflation adjustment rate. The principal amount of these claims will be paid in 108 monthly installments beginning in March 2024, in the amount of 0.33% of the outstanding principal for the first 60 monthly installments, 1.67% of the outstanding principal for the next 47 monthly installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2033. The principal amount of these claims accrue interest at the TJLP rate plus 2.946372%per annum. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these claims on an annual basis until February 2022, and will be paid monthly in cash thereafter through the final maturity.

Restructured Brazilian Credit Agreements and CRIs

By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that Telemar’s unsecured line of credit and our obligations under CRIs backed by receivables representing all payments under leases entered into by Oi and Telemar of real estate properties to our wholly-owned subsidiary Copart 4 Participações S.A., or Copart 4, and Oi transferred 101 real estate properties to Copart 5 Participações S.A., or Copart 5, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Telemar entered into lease contracts with terms of up to 12 years for the continued use of all of the properties transferred to Copart 4 and Oi entered into lease contracts with terms of up to 12 years for the continued use of all of the properties transferred to Copart 5.

owned by Copart 4 and Copart 5 assignedwere novated and the receivables representing all paymentscreditors under this unsecured line of credit and the holders of the CRIs are entitled to receive as recovery for their claims under these leases to Brazilian Securities Companhia de Securitização, which issued Real Estate Receivables Certificates (instruments payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims inCertificados de Recebíveis Imobiliáriosreais), or CRIs, backed by these receivables. The CRIs were purchased by Brazilian financial institutions.

We received net proceeds from the assignment of lease receivablespayable in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the total aggregate amount of R$1,585 million on a consolidated basis,2.0% of the recognized claims for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the recognized claims for the next 13 semi-annual installments and recorded our obligations to make the assigned payments as short- and long-term debtremainder at maturity in our consolidated financial statements.February 2035. The aggregate net effectiverecognized amount of these claims accrue interest at the rate on this transaction is 102%of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the recognized amount of these claims on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity.

Non-Qualified Credit Agreement

TheNon-Qualified Credit Agreement is a credit agreement entered into between the RJ Debtors and an administrative agent in accordance with the terms of Section 4.3.3.1 of the RJ Plan and Exhibit 4.3.3.1(f). The proceeds raised in this transaction were used to repay short-term debt. In June 2012,obligations of Oi under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Copart 4Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, and Copart 5 partially redeemedPTIF. Principal under the CRIs that they had issued for an aggregateNon-Qualified Credit Agreement will be paid in 12 semiannual installments beginning in August 2024 in the amount of R$393 million. As4% of December 31, 2015, the aggregate liabilityoutstanding principal for the first six semi-annual installments, 12.66% of the outstanding principal for the next five semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2030. TheNon-Qualified Credit Agreement accrues interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these leases was R$952 million.

Capital Expenditures

During 2015 we followed the strategy included in the Transformation Plan of modernizing our core network, with a focusNon-Qualified Credit Agreement on infrastructure improvementsan annual basis until February 2023, and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep upwill be paid together with the growing demand, In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.principal beginning in August 2024.

Our efforts to lower our capital expenditures in 2015 include: (1) renegotiating contracts with our suppliers; (2) increasing our involvement in fixed network sharing, including RAN sharing on our 4G network; and (3) structural projects that increaseDefault Recovery

Under the efficiency of services to both fixed and mobile broadband customers (i.e. faster downloads, higher quality HD video channels, and improved voice and video calls) and reduce infrastructure costs.

Our capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assetsRJ Plan, certain of our continuing operationscreditors were R$3,681 millionentitled to elect forms of recovery other than the Default Recovery between February 5, 2018 and February 26, 2018. Creditors entitled to make these elections that elected the Default Recovery or failed to make the election are entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to their recognized claims. Holders of Defaulted Bonds that were not eligible to make an election with respect to the form of recovery on their claims are entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to their recognized claims.

Under the RJ Plan, the Default Recovery consists of an unsecured right to receive payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims represented by:

Defaulted Bonds issued by Oi or Oi Coop in 2015, R$5,382 millionfive annual, equal installments, commencing on July 22, 2038;

Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIF in 2014five annual, equal installments, commencing on June 19, 2038; and R$6,614 million

Credits the holders of which were entitled to make recovery elections (other than the Defaulted Bonds), in 2013. Our capital expendituresfive annual, equal installments, commencing on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of our discontinued operations were R$911 millionFebruary 5, 2038, which, in 2014. The following table sets forth our capital expenditure payments on plant expansion and modernization of our continuing operations for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$1,201    R$1,207    R$1,699  

Installation services and devices

   358     878     625  

Mobile network and systems

   528     877     1,120  

Voice transmission

   605     663     886  

Information technology services

   380     454     370  

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   444     281     405  

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   73     166     289  

Submarine cables

   —       —       23  

Network management system equipment

   72     113     227  

Backbone transmission

   293     159     69  

Internet services equipment

   2     3     6  

Other

   208     478     531  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

   4,164     5,279     6,250  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our data transmission networks, our mobile services networks, our voice transmission networks, our information technology equipment and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” and “quadruple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support satellite video transport services, IP TV and RF overlay video services, internet with speeds up to up to 200 Mbps, and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM protocol over legacy copper wire and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

In 2015 Oi began implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, whicheach case, we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and B2BDefault Recovery Entitlement.

A holder’s Default Recovery Entitlement is denominated in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of networks problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In 2015, we transformed our IP backbone to expand its capacity and speed to operate 10/100 Gbps line rate interfaces on our new OTN/DWDM network over 30,000 km of fiber-optic cable. The OTN/DWDM network is designed to protect against interruptions in service caused by external events and accidents. Since January 2014, Our OTN/DWDM network has experienced an average annual growth of traffic, especially in data traffic, of more than 40% per year.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoptioncurrency of the single edge concept,recognized claim with respect to which means using one single routerthe Default Recovery Entitlement relates. The Default Recovery Entitlement with respect to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

2G & 3G Networks

We are implementing wireless local loop technologyDefaulted Bonds denominated in areas not supported by our fixed-line network to provide service to our customers through our 2G network.

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. Since December 2007, when we acquired our authorizations to provide 3G services, we have engaged in a program of developing our 3G network. We are deploying new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Regions I, II and III where we currently do not provide 3G service. We are continuing to upgrade portions of our 3G mobile network to support greater data rates through the HSPA+ standard.

In 2014, we extended our service area to include 118 new municipalities with 3G technology. We also activated HSPA+ in 3,302 sites in 2014, which allowed our customers to transfer data at higher speeds. We currently provide 3G services to 1,290 municipalities. We have increased the capacity of our 3G network in order to support the growing demand for mobile data services. We expect to perform capacity expansions in 37% of our existing 3G sites during 2016 to increase the speed of our 3G connection. Furthermore, in order to improve the experience of our data service users, we began granting our 2G users access to our 3G network by migrating the user’s data plan from 2G to 3G and upgrading their devices to be 3G compatible.

4G Network

In June 2012, we acquired the authorizations and radio frequency licenses necessary for us to commence the offering of 4G services throughout Brazil. We intend to offer 4G services throughout Brasil using LTE network technology and have begun deploying our 4G network. As part of this project, we have upgraded our existing mobile core to the LTE Evolved Packet Core, using an Evolved NodeB base station under a Radio Access Network that we will share with other Brazilian mobile services operators.

In 2013, we commenced offering 4G services in the 12 cities where the FIFA World Cup was held, pursuant to the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. For a discussion of RAN sharing, see “Item 4: Information on the Company—Network and Facilities—Infrastructure Sharing Agreements—4G Network.” In addition, we extended LTE services in 2015 to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, including 88 new municipalities, as a result of obligations imposed by ANATEL.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching station to support next-generation networks to support offerings of new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such voice over broadband; and

significantly promote fixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we are concluding the deployment of an IP Multimedia Subsystem,U.S. dollars or IMS, core that will facilitate our convergent voice, broadband and IP TV offerings. The IMS core not only will provide control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all three services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We are also undertaking a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

We monitor the anticipated demands of new residential developments and the service demand growth of existing residential areas to ensure that we make adequate network equipment available to service the demands of these areas.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply of our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems, or BSS, and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In March 2013, we began investing in a transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer focused approach and thereby our network operations will migrate from network operations centers to service operations centers which will provide more efficient and customer-based support. We expect to complete this project in January 2017.

Another of our projects is to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reduce costly human intervention and increase overall customer quality of experience through automation of fulfillment processes. Our goal is to evolve as close as possible to a zero-touch provisioning process, without user intervention. This project began in March 2012 and is expected to be completed in December 2016.

We are investing in the expansion of our transport networks in an effort to ensure that our networks continue to have the capacity to serve our customers and to support our plans to expand our services. In 2015, we activated the first chain in Brazil of entirely 100 Gbps interfaces along our OTN/DWDM network of over 30,000 km of fiber optic cables connecting 12 Brazilian capitals (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Vitoria, Porto Alegre, Florianópolis, Curitiba, Salvador, Fortaleza, Recife, Teresina and Brasilia). This structural transformation is intended to increase the quality and data transmission capacity of our networkeuros, as well as protect against interruptionsthe Default Recovery Entitlement for other credits denominated in service causedU.S. dollars, will not bear any interest. The Default Recovery Entitlement with respect to Oi’s 9.75% senior notes due 2016 and other credits denominated inreais will bear interest at the Brazilian TR rate (payable together with the last installment of principal), which will accrue as additional principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement until July 22, 2038 (in the case of Oi’s 9.75% senior notes due 2016) or February 5, 2038 (with respect to other credits denominated inreais) and thereafter be payable together with payments of principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement. The principal and accrued interest with respect to the Default Recovery Entitlement may be redeemed at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, by external events and accidents.the RJ Debtors at a redemption price of 15% of the aggregate principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement.

We are also investing in projects to improve our networks by increasing the redundancy of our wire and fiber optic cable routes and establishing network mesh routes. We also perform preventive maintenance on sections of our network that have unusually high failure rates, and have a program to replace network elements in these sections.

We are investing in the standardization of our facilities to deter fraud and improve the quality of our services, including the replacement of some of our public telephones.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

WeAs of the date of this annual report, we do not currently have any transactions involvingoff-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

OurOi’s board of directors (conselho de administração) and ourOi’s board of executive officers(diretoria) are responsible for operating our business.

Board of Directors

OurGeneral

Oi’s board of directors is a decision-making body responsible for, among other things, determining policies and guidelines for our business and ourOi’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and controlled companies. OurOi’s board of directors also supervises ourOi’s board of executive officers and monitors its implementation of the policies and guidelines that are established from time to time by the board of directors. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, ourOi’s board of directors is also responsible for hiring independent accountants.

Our Oi’sby-laws provide for a board of directors of up to 11 members and an equal number ofwith no alternate members. AsMembers who are absent at meetings will be entitled to appoint a substitute among the present members to vote in their stead. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, at least 20% of the datemembers of this annual report, ourthe Oi’s board of directors is composedmust be independent as defined in the listing regulations of 10theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 and must be expressly declared as independent in the shareholders’ meeting that elects them, being also considered as independent the members elected as per article 141, paragraphs 4 and nine alternate members. During periods5 of absence or temporary unavailabilitythe Brazilian Corporate Law. All of a regular memberthe members of ourOi’s board of directors the corresponding alternate member substitutes for the absent or unavailable regular member.are independent.

The members of our board of directorsDirectors are elected at general meetings of shareholders fortwo-year terms and are eligible for reelection. The termsGenerally, members of all current members expire at our annual shareholders’ meeting that approves the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. Members of ourOi’s board of directors are subject to removal at any time with or without cause at a general meeting of shareholders. Our The RJ Plan, however, provides certain corporate governance rules that apply to Oi’s board of directors during the effectiveness of the RJ Plan, superseding the provisions of Oi’sby-laws. As provided in the RJ Plan, until the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, which will occur on September 17, 2020, the members of Oi’s board of directors may not be removed from office, except due to gross mistake, willful misconduct, gross negligence, abuse of term of office or violation of fiduciary duties in accordance with applicable law. Following the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, the election of subsequent boards of directors will follow the rules established by Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law. Oi’sby-laws do not contain any citizenship or residency requirements for members of ourOi’s board of directors. OurHowever, a member’s tenure is conditioned on the appointment of a representative who resides in Brazil, with powers to receive service of process in proceedings initiated against such member based on the corporate legislation, by means of apower-of-attorney with a term of at least three years after the end of such member’s term of office.

Oi’s board of directors is presided over by the chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by his designated alternate. The chairmanthe vice-chairman of ourthe board of directors is electedand, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by the general meeting of shareholders that elects the directors. Our by-laws provide that the chairman of our board of directors may not serve as our chief executive officer.

Our board of directors ordinarily meets once every month and extraordinarily when a meeting is calledanother member appointed by the chairman or, any twoif no such member has been appointed, by another member appointed by the other members in attendance. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, the chairman and vice-chairman of our board of directors. Decisions of ourOi’s board of directors require a quorum of a majorityare elected by the members of the Oi’s board of directors during their first meeting following their election. Oi’sby-laws provide that the positions of chairman of Oi’s board of directors and are takenOi’s chief executive officer or principal executive may not be held by a majority vote of those directors present.the same person.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of ourOi’s board of directors and their alternates.directors.

 

Name

  PositionMember SinceAge

PositionEleazar de Carvalho Filho

  ChairmanJanuary 201862

Member SinceMarcos Grodetzky

  AgeVice-ChairmanJanuary 201863

Henrique José Fernandes Luz

DirectorSeptember 201864

José Mauro Mettrau Carneiro da Cunha

  ChairmanDirector  February 2009  6670

Fernando Marques dos SantosMarcos Bastos Rocha

  AlternateDirector  May 2012January 2018  6355

Luiz Antonio do Souto GonçalvesMaria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana

  Director  September 20152018  5960

Joaquim Dias de Castro

AlternateSeptember 201537

Rafael Luís Mora Funes

DirectorOctober 201451

JoãoPaulino do Passo Vicente Ribeiro

AlternateSeptember 201567

João Manuel Pisco de Castro

DirectorFebruary 201650

Pedro Guimarães e Melo de Oliveira Guterres

AlternateFebruary 201644

Luís Maria Viana Palha da SilvaRego Barros Jr.

  Director  September 20152018  5963

Maria do Rosário Amado Pinto Correia

AlternateFebruary 201661

André CardosoWallim Cruz de Menezes NavarroVasconcellos Junior

  Director  September 20152018  5262

Nuno Rocha dos Santos de Almeida e Vasconcellos

AlternateSeptember 201551

Thomas Cornelius Azevedo ReichenheimRoger Solé Rafols

  Director  September 2015December 2018  6845

Sérgio Bernstein

AlternateApril 201479

Robin Anne BienenstockClaudia Quintella Woods

  Director  September 2015March 2020  4744

Marcos Grodetzky

AlternateSeptember 201559

Marten PietersArmando Lins Netto(1)

  Director  September 2015March 2020  62

Pedro Zañartu Gubert Morais Leitão

AlternateSeptember 201550

Ricardo Malavazi Martins

DirectorSeptember 2015 51

(1)

Mr. Netto was elected to serve on Oi’s board of directors at a meeting of the board of directors which took place on March 13, 2020. The investiture of Mr. Armando Lins Netto is conditioned upon the prior assessment of ANATEL.

We summarize below the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of our current directors and their alternates.Oi’s directors.

Directors

Eleazar de Carvalho Filho. Mr. Carvalho has served as the chairman of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018 and a member of Oi’s board of directors since January 2018. Mr. Carvalho works at Virtus BR Partners, where he is a founding partner. Mr. Carvalho also has served as a member of the board of directors at Brookfield Partners Renewables L.P., TechnipFMC and Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (Grupo Pão de Açúcar / Cnova N.V.). He is also chairman of the board of trustees of the Brazilian Symphony Orchestra Foundation. Previously, Mr. Carvalho was CEO of Unibanco Banco de Investimento, BNDES and UBS Brasil. He was head of the corporate finance division of Banco Garantia in Rio de Janeiro, director and treasurer of Alcoa Alumínio and director of the international area of Crefisul (Citigroup). Mr. Carvalho has extensive experience as a director of large companies listed in Brazil and abroad. He was a member of the boards of directors of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A, Petrobras, Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, Eletrobrás, Alpargatas, among others and also President of BHP Billiton Brasil. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from New York University and a Master’s degree in international relations from Johns Hopkins University.

Marcos Grodetzky. Mr. Grodetzky has served as the vice-chairman of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018 and a member of Oi’s board of directors since January 2018. Previously, he served as an alternate member of Oi’s board of directors from September 2015 until July 2016 and as a member of Oi’s board of directors from July 2016 until September 2016. Mr. Grodetzky is an independent member of the board of directors of Constellation Oil Services, Vicunha Aços and Elizabeth S.A. Indústria Textil and Chairman of Burger King Brasil. He is the founding partner of Mediator Assessoria Empresarial, engaged in financial advisory and mediation. Until October 2013, Mr. Grodetzky served as CEO of DGB S.A., a logistics holding company of Grupo Abril S.A. and parent company of the following companies: Dinap – Dist. Nacional de Publicações, Magazine Express Comercial Imp e Exp de Revistas, Entrega Fácil Logística Integrada, FC Comercial e Distribuidora, Treelog S.A. – Logística e Distribuição, DGB Logística e Distribuição Geográfica, and TEX Courier (Total Express). In addition, he served as finance and investor relations vice-president of Telemar/Oi, Aracruz Celulose/Fibria, and Cielo S.A from 2002 until 2010. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and attended the Senior Management Program at INSEAD/FDC.

Henrique José Fernandes Luz. Mr. Fernandes Luz has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018. He has been a member of the board of directors of the Maringá Group and a member of the board of directors of Burger King do Brasil. Mr. Fernandes Luz serves as chairman of the board of the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC). He was a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes from 1988 to 2018, having previously worked various positions in that firm since 1975. He holds a degree in Accounting from Universidade Candido Mendes in Rio de Janeiro and attended various executive programs at Harvard, University of Virginia, London Business School, University of Buenos Aires and Singularity University. He also serves as a vice chairman of the board of IBEF—Instituto Brasileiro de Executivos de Finanças and of The Dorina Nowill Foundation for the Blind, and as board member of The National Children and Youth Book Foundation and of The São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro Museums of Modern Art.

José Mauro Mettrau Carneiro da Cunha.Mr. Cunha has served as our chairmana member of Oi’s board of directors since February 2009.2009, having served as its chairman until September 2018. Since December 2019, he has been Chairman of Odebrecht S.A., having served as a member of the board of directors since October 2019. Mr. Cunha has also served as Chairman of Braskem S.A. since December 2019. From January 2013 until June 2013, Mr. Cunha served as ourOi’s interim chief executive officer, during which time he resigned as chairman and member of ourOi’s board of directors. He resumed his position as ourOi’s chairman and a member of ourOi’s board of directors in June 2013. Mr. Cunha has also served as chairman of the board of directors of Dommo Empreendimentos Imobiliários since 2007.S.A. from 2007 until December 2016. He previously served as chairman of the board of directors of (i)(1) TNL from April 1999 until March 2003 and from April 2007 until February 2012, where he also served as an alternate director in 2006; (ii)(2) Telemar Norte Leste S.A. from April 2007 until April 2012, where he served as a member of the board of directors from April 1999 until May 2012; (iii)(3) TNL PCS from April 2007 until April 2012; (iv)(4) Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A. from April 2008 until February 2012; and (v)(5) Coari Participações S.A. from May 2007 until February 2012. In addition, Mr. Cunha was a director of TmarPartTelemar Participações S.A. from April 2008 until September 2015. He has also served on the board of directors of Santo Antonio Energia S.A. since April 2008 and Pharol since May 2015. He was a member of the board of directors of Vale S.A. from April 2010 until April 2015. Mr. Cunha was an executive officer of Lupatech S.A. from April 2006 to April 2012, where he served as a member of the board of directors from April 2006 to April 2012. He has also held several executive positions at the BNDES, and was a member of its board of executive officers from 1991 to 2002. He was the vice president of strategic planning of Braskem S.A. from February 2003 to October 2005, and business consultant from November 2005 to February 2007. Mr. Cunha was a member of the board of directors ofLog-In Logistica Intermodal S.A. from April 2007 to March 2011, Braskem S.A. from July 2007 to April 2010, Banco do Estado do Espírito Santo S.A. (Banestes) from April 2008 to April 2009, Light Serviços de Eletricidade S.A. from December 1997 to July 2000, Aracruz Celulose S.A. from June 1997 to July 2002, FUNTTEL from December 2000 to January 2002, FUNCEX- Fundação Centro de Estudos do Comércio Exterior from June 1997 to January 2002, and Politeno Indústria e Comércio S.A. from April 2003 to April 2004. Mr. Cunha holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Universidade Católica de Petrópolis in Rio de Janeiro and a master’sMaster’s degree in industrial and transportation projects from Instituto

Alberto Luiz Coimbra dePós-Graduação (COPPE) at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He attended the Executive Program in Management at the Anderson School at the University of California in Los Angeles.

Luiz Antonio do Souto Gonçalves.Marcos Bastos Rocha.Mr. Gonçalves has been serving on our board of directors since September 2015. He is currently the superintendent of the Venture Capital area of BNDES Participações S.A. (BNDESPAR), responsible for the investment, monitoring, and divestiture in closely-held companies of the BNDESPAR portfolio and Equity Investment Funds since 2011. Mr. Gonçalves started his career at BNDES in 1982 as engineer of the Priority Area, where he also served as planning manager of BNDESPAR, head of the Urban Mobility Department, head of the Planning Department of BNDES, and superintendent of the capital markets area of BNDESPAR. He also worked as head of the Claims Department of Banco Bradesco between 1980 and 1982. Mr. Gonçalves holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from UERJ in Rio de Janeiro (1980), an Executive MBA from COPPEAD/UFRJ in Rio de Janeiro (1980), a master’s degree in production engineering from COPPE/UFRJ in Rio de Janeiro (2001), and Ph.D. in production engineering from COPPE/UFRJ (2003 to 2004).

Rafael Luís Mora Funes. Mr. FunesRocha has served as a member of ourOi’s board of directors since October 2014 andJanuary 2018. He has also served as the coordinatorchairman of the Engineering, Technology and Networks Committeeboard of directors of Paranapanema S.A. since September 2015. Mr. Funes is currentlyMarch 2020, an independent member of the board of directors of IRB Brasil RE since March 2019, a member of the board of directors of Pharol, chairmanInvepar S.A. since September 2019, a member of the board of directors of Webspectator Corp.,GRU Airport since November 2019 and a member of the Advisory Boardboard of ISCTE Business School. Mr. Funes holdsdirectors of Brazil Fast Food Corporation since 2009. He has been a bachelor’s degree in economysenior partner at DealMaker since July 2015 and business management from Malaga University.

João Manuel Pisco de Castro. Mr. Castro has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2016 and previously was an alternate member of our board of directors sincenon-executive senior advisor at Roland Berger Strategy Consultants from September 2015. Mr. Castro serves as vice president of Grupo Visabeira SGPS S.A., Visabeira Imobiliária SGPS S.A., Visabeira Indústria SGPS S.A., Visabeira Participações Financeiras SGPS S.A., and Vista Alegre Atlantis SGPS S.A.2015 until December 2019. He serves as the CEO of Visabeira Global SGPS S.A., Visagreen SGPS S.A., and Real Life Tecnologia de Informação S.A. and is the manager of the following companies: Ambitermo Engenharia e Equipamentos Térmicos S.A., Gevisar SGPS S.A., Granbeira Sociedade de Exploração e Comércio de Granitos, Granbeira II Rochas Ornamentais S.A., Visacasa S.A., Constructel (Belgium), Constructel Sweden AB, and Constructel (Russia). In addition, Mr. Castro has served as a member of the board of directors of Grupo Visabeira SGPS S.A.BC2 Construtora from 2002 to 2007, president of the Instituto de Gestão Financeira e de Infra-Estrutiuras da Justiça I.P. from 2007 to 2009April 2016 until May 2019 and as manager of the following companies: Visabeira Telecomunicações e Construção SGPS S.A. from 2002 to 2006, Visabeira Serviços SGPS S.A. from 2003 to 2005, Ifervisa S.A. from 2005 to 2007, Viatel S.A. from 2005 to 2007, Visacasa S.A. from 2003 to 2005, Figueira Paranova S.A. from 2005 to 2006 and Beiragás S.A. from 2000 to 2003. He also served as: manager of Visabeira Ltda. from 2004 to 2007, management advisor of Grupo Visabeira from 1995 to 2000, CEO of Grupo Visabeira in Azores from 1993 to 1995, regional officer of Grupo Visabeira in Lisbon from 1989 to 1993, head of department of Centro e Exploração de Carcavelos dos TLP from 1985 to 1989, specialist in production management of TLP from 1983 to 1985, professor at Escola Salesiana do Estoril from 1981 to 1983 and managing partner and professor of Externato das Neves, Viana do Castelo from 1977 to 1981. Mr. Castro holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering, with a specialization in telecommunications and electronics, from Instituto Superior Técnico and an MBA from Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Lisboa.

Luís Maria Viana Palha da Silva. Mr. Silva has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2015 and currently serves as chairman of the board of directors and CEO of Pharol. Mr. Silva served as vice-chairman of the board of directors and executive committee of GALP Energia, SGPS, SA from 2102 to 2015. He was a member of the board of directors and audit committee of NYSE Euronext from 2012 to 2013. Mr. Silva worked at Jerónimo Martins, SGPS, S.A. as CFO from 2001 to 2004, and as CEO from 2004 to 2010. In 2011, he worked at Jerónimo Martins, SGPS, S.A. as non-executive member of the board of directors and chairman of the corporate responsibility committee. He served as CFO of CIMPOR - Cimentos de Portugal from 1995 to 2001 and as State Secretary of Commerce of Portugal from 1992 to 1995, responsible for foreign economic relations, trade and investment, and supervision of domestic trade, food security, and antitrust enforcement. Mr. Silva served as CFO at COVINA, Companhia Vidreira Nacional, from 1987 to 1992. Mr. Silva holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Instituto Superior de Economia (1978) and in business administration from Universidade Católica Portuguesa (1981). He attended the Advanced Management Program at University of Pennsylvania - Wharton School of Economics (2005).

André Cardoso de Menezes Navarro. Mr. Navarro has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2015. He also serves as general director of Millennium Investment Bank where he is responsible for the investment division, and as aalternate member of the board of directors of Interoceanico where he is responsible for monitoringLight S.A. from September 2018 until April 2019. Between 2010 and 2015, Mr. Rocha was the company’s investment portfolio management. He acted as chairmanvice president of finance and administration at Invepar – Investimentos e Participações em Infraestrutura and a member of the Banco Privado Atlantico Europaboards of directors of the companies in its portfolio. He was a member of the fiscal council of Abril Educação from 20082012 to 2014, as CEO of Société Generale Corporate and Investment Bank from 2002 to2015. Between 2008 and as shareholder2009, Mr. Rocha was the CFO, investor relations officer, CIO, shared services officer and managing director of Fundamentis Investimentoshuman resources officer at Globex Utilidades. Previously, he held the following positions: general executive officer at Banco Investcred Unibanco S.A. – Pontocred from 2005 until 2008; CFO and investor relations officer at Sendas S.A. from 2003 until 2005; CFO at the following companies: Horizon Telecom International from 2001 until 2002, GVT – Global Village Telecom in 2001, Global Telecom S.A. from 2000 to 2002. Betweenuntil 2001 and Brazil Fast Food Corp. (Bob’s) from 1996 until 1998; administrative officer at Sony Music Entertainment from 1998 until 1999; and 2002, he worked as managing director of the International Division of Banco Espírito Santo and, between 1992 and 1998, as managing director of the Corporate and the Investment Divisions of the same bank. He workedcontroller at Cyanamid Química do Brasil from 1991 until 1996. Mr. Rocha holds bachelor’s degree in the Investment Area of the Companhia Nacional de Mineração (Brazil) from 1986 to 1990, and as credit analyst of the Chase Banco Lar (Brazil) from 1986 to 1988. He graduated with a law degreeelectronic engineering from the State UniversityMilitary Institute of Rio de Janeiro in 1986, receivedEngineering (IME), a graduateMaster of Business Administration degree in Financefinance from the Fundação Getúlio Vargas (“FGV”)PUC-RJ and an Executive MBA in 1988, an MBAmanagement from the American Graduate School of International Business - Thunderbird, in 1992, and attended the Executive Program in Leadership at the Harvard Business School in 2014.PDG/EXEC – SDE/IBMEC.

Thomas Cornelius Azevedo Reichenheim.Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana Mr. Reichenheim. Ms. Fernandes de Santana has served as a member of ourOi’s board of directors since September 2015. He has been the CEO of Carisma Comercial Ltda., a foreign trade company, since 2002, and a member of the board of directors of Jereissati Telecom S.A. since 2010. He served as market relations officer and member of the management of Grupo Jereissati from 1984 to 2015. He served as member of the board of directors of Didier & Levy Associados, a brokerage firm, from 1998 to 2014. Mr. Reichenheim served as: (i) commercial officer, insurance officer, and investment officer of Banco Auxiliar from 1977 to 1983; (ii) foreign exchange manager, commercial manager, and assistant officer of Banco Real from 1972 to 1977; and (iii) trainee of the marketing area of Banco Unibanco from 1969 to 1971. Mr. Reichenheim holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from EAESP - FGV/SP (1972) and law from FMU (1972). He holds graduate degrees in business administration and finance from EAESP FGV/SP.

Robin Anne Bienenstock. Ms. Bienenstock has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2015. Ms. Bienenstock, a telecom expert, is a partner of Gladwyne Partners, an investment fund. Previously, she was the senior analyst covering Latin American and European Telecoms at Sanford C Bernstein for seven years. Ms. Bienenstock was an associate principal at McKinsey & Co.2018. She started her career working for Bunting Warburg as an investment banking analyst and also worked for the European Union Administration of Mostar in Bosnia, managing a revolving loan fund for small and medium companies. Ms. Bienenstock holds a bachelor’s degree from Oxford University in politics, philosophy and economics, a master’s degree from SDA Bocconi in international economics and management.

Marten Pieters. Mr. Pieters has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2015. He served as managing director and chief executive officer of Vodafone India Ltd. (before that Vodafone Essar Ltd) in India from April 2009 until April 2015. Mr. Pieters has served as vice chairman and chairman of Cellular Operators Association of India between August 2012 and July 2015. Mr. Pieters served as chief executive officer of MSI, which became Celtel International B.V., from 2003 until 2007, during which period the company with mobile operations in 14 African countries was acquired by MTC Kuwait. Between 1989 and 2003, he worked at KPN, the Dutch incumbent operator, where he has served as member of the executive management board of KPN Telecom since 2000 as the person responsible for the Business Solutions division of KPN and for its investments in emerging markets. Mr. Pieters also served as executive vice president of the international operations division of KPN, covering Eastern and Central Europe, Asia, and the United States. In 1989, he started working at KPN as secretary of the board of directors. He also served as commercial officer and general manager of a telecommunications district. Since 1995, Mr. Pieters has been serving in KPN as vice president of the international operations division, and was responsible for the affiliates of KPN. Since 1998, he has been serving as executive vice president for KPN International. He was a member of the (supervisory) boards of a number of operators, including Cesky Telecom in Czech Republic, Eircom plc in Ireland, Utel and UMC in the Ukraine, Pannon GSM in Hungary, Euroweb, KPNQwest and Xantic, a joint venture between Telstra and KPN. Mr. Pieters served as non-executive officer of Millicom International Cellular SA between May 2008 and February 2009. Before beginning his career in the telecommunications industry, Mr. Pieters worked for 11 years (from 1979 until 1989) at the Royal Smilde Foods as chief financial and strategic planning officer and CEO of certain subsidiaries in the Netherlands. Mr. Pieters currently is a member of the board of directors of Vodafone India, INDUS Towers and Vodacom in South Africa. He is actively involved in charities and serves as chairman of the supervisory board of the Investment Fund for Health in Africa. He also serves as officer of Social Investor Foundation for Africa. Mr. Pieters holds a law degree

from University of Groningen, Netherlands, and a graduate degree in economics from the University of Groningen, Netherlands.

Ricardo Malavazi Martins.Mr. Martins has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2015. He has been a member of the board of directors of Jereissati Participaçõesthe BME – Bolsas y Mercados Españoles since April 2016; a member of the audit committee of Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A., a company that holds equity interest in other companies, since March 2011June 2014 and a member of the board of directors of Pharol since May 2015. He is currently an associate of TPYX Assessoria Empresarial and has been serving as memberthe chairman of the Corporate Governance Committeeaudit committee of XP Inc. Ms. Fernandes served as a trustee of the American Chamber of São Paulo since 2003. Mr. Martins served as chief financial and investments officer of PETROS for 6 years and as officer and consultant of Stratus Investimentos (a private equity management firm) for 3 years. HeInternational Financial Reporting Standards Foundation from January 2014 until December 2019. She was a member of the board of directors of Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição, a retail company, between February 2013 and June 2017, Totvs S.A., an information technology company, between April 2013 and March 2017 and CPFL Energia S.A., an energy company, between April 2013 and April 2015. She previously worked at the following companies: TrisulCVM, where she served as Chairman, between July 2007 and July 2012, and Commissioner, between July 2006 and July 2007. She was chairwoman of the executive committee of the IOSCO – International Organization of Securities Commission between 2011 and 2012. She worked at the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo S.A.; Fras-Le S.A.; Iguatemi Empresa de Shopping Centers S.A.; CPFL; – BVSP), or the BOVESPA, between July 1994 and Coteminas S.A. HeMay 2006, where she was responsible for listed company oversight, attracting new companies and implementing the Novo Mercado. She holds a degree in Economics from the University of São Paulo.

Paulino do Rego Barros Jr. Mr. Barros has served as a member of the fiscal council of Brasil Telecom, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., Telemar Participações S.A., and Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A. Mr. Martins was a member of the advisory board of ABVCAP (Associação Brasileira de Venture Capital e Private Equity) and of the investment committee of ABRAPP. He started his executive career as an economist focused on treasury transactions of banks (responsible for the economic areas of BCN and Bradesco) between 1990 and 2003, when he served as vice-president of the Economy Commission (Comissão de Economia) of FEBRABAN. Mr. Martins holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from UNICAMP, where he also attended courses in the master’s program, and attended courses for the MBA program in management at IBMEC-RJ.

Alternate Directors

Fernando Marques dos Santos. Mr. Santos has served as an alternate member of ourOi’s board of directors since September 2018. He was the Interim CEO of Equifax, INC, from September 2017 to April 2018, having previously led the company’s business in the Asia-Pacific region from July to September 2017, the company’s U.S. Information Solutions business from October 2015 to June 2017 and its international business unit, covering Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Canada, from April 2010 to October 2015. Prior to joining Equifax, he founded PB&C – Global Investments (LLC), an international investment and consulting firm, and has been its President since November 2008. From January 2007 until November 2008, he was the President of AT&T Global Operations. He held various executive positions at BellSouth Corporation from December 2000 to January 2007 before BellSouth was acquired by AT&T, including Corporate Product Officer, President of BellSouth Latin America, Corporate Regional Vice-President of Latin America, and Chief Planning and Operations Officer for BellSouth International. From February 1996 to December 2000, he worked for Motorola, Inc., having served as Corporate Vice President and General Manager – Latin America Group and as Corporate Vice President and General Manager of Market Operations – Americas, for the Cellular Business Unit. He also held various positions at The NutraSweet Company, as well as at the U.S. and Latin American divisions of Monsanto Company. He served ason the advisory board of Cingular Wireless, Converged Services Group and on the board of Alianza – the BellSouth Corporation Latino Association. Between 2012 and 2015, Mr. Barros served on the board of NII Holdings and is a member of our board of directors from May 2012 until September 2015. Since 2012, he has been an executive officer of BNDES, where he is responsible for the human resources, AGIR Project and information technology and processes departments. Prior to being named an executive officer, he served in the office of the president and vice-president of BNDES. Mr. Santos has worked at BNDES since 1983, having served as superintendent of the credit department from 1994 to 2003, manager of the credit department (compliance) from 1989 to 1994 and manager of the projects department from 1983 to 1989.recently created McKinsey & Company, Inc. – Crisis Response Advisory Board. He holds a degree in mechanical and electrical engineering from Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UERJ.

Joaquim Dias de Castro. Mr. Castro has served as an alternate memberthe School of our boardIndustrial Engineering and the College of directors since September 2015. He has been managerEngineering of the Capital Markets department of the BNDES since 2008São José dos Campos, in São Paulo, and worked in the Credit department of the BNDES from 2004 until 2008. Mr. Castro has been a member of the fiscal council of AES Eletropaulo since April 2011 and a member of the fiscal council of JBS SA since April 2013. He served as a member of the fiscal council of AES Tiete from April 2011 to April 2013 and as a member of the board of directors of Rede Energia S.A. from April 2010 to April 2012. He also served as a member of the board of directors of Renova S.A. from April 2013 to April 2014, a member of the board of directors of Light S.A. from April 2010 to April 2012, board of directors of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., Telemar Participações S.A. from June 2015 to September 2015, and CTX Participações S.A. from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Castro holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul and a master’s degree in economicsbusiness administration from EscolaWashington University in St. Louis.

Wallim Cruz de Pós Graduação em Economia da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - RJ.

João do Passo Vicente Ribeiro.Mr. Ribeiro has served as an alternate member of our board of directors since September 2015. He has been as manager of Pharol SGPS, S.A. since May 2015 and served as CEO of AMP-Sociedade Gestora de Fundos de Investimento Mobiliário from 2014 to 2015. He was appointed coordinator of the Work Group on Financial Mechanisms and Instruments to Support Tourism of the Tourism Office in Portugal in 2012. Mr. Ribeiro served as manager of SLN SGPS, S.A. from 2008 to 2009, manager of Banco Português de Negócios in 2008, president and founder of Quadrantis - Sociedade de Capital de Risco from 2007 until 2008, CEO of PME Investimentos from 2004 to 2007, CEO of APFIN-Associação Portuguesa das Sociedades Gestoras de Património e Fundos de Pensões from 2002 to 2003, manager of AF Investimento - Sociedade Gestora de Património e Fundos de Investimento do Grupo BCP from 2002 to 2003, general officer of BCP-Banco Comercial Português and Banco Português do Atlântico in the private banking, large companies, and retail banking areas from 1986 to 2002 and officer in Paris and London for the branches of Banco Português do Atlântico from 1980 to 1986 and of the Instituto de Crédito de Angola from 1974 to 1975. Mr. Ribeiro holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from Instituto Superior de Economia da Universidade de Lisboa and an MBA degree from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France.

Pedro Guimarães e Melo de Oliveira GuterresVasconcellos Junior. Mr. Guterres has been a member of our board of directors since February 2016 and previously served in this capacity from October 2014 to September 2015. Mr. Guterres has served as a regular member of the board of directors of Pharol Brasil Ltda. since 2015. Mr. Guterres was an officer of Telemar Participações S.A. from 2011 to 2015, a member of the board of directors of Bratel Brasil from 2011 to 2015, a member of the board of directors of Medi Telecom from 2008 to 2009 and director of planning and control of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. (currently Pharol) from 2009 to 2010. Previously, Mr. Guterres held the positions of director of corporate finance of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A. from 2008 to 2010, director of planning and control of PT Comunicações S.A. from 2007 to 2008, director of planning and control of PT Multimédia from 2003 to 2007 and director of business development of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A. from 2000 to 2003. Before joining the Portugal Telecom Group, Mr. Guterres worked at Merrill Lynch Investment Banking from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Guterres holds a degree in economics from the Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

Maria do Rosário Amado Pinto Correia.Mrs. Pinto Correia has served as an alternate member of our board of directors since February 2016. SheVasconcellos has served as a member of the board of directors of Pharol since 2015, chairman of Ferreira Marques & Irmão since 2012, and CEO of Topázio since 2012. Previously, Mrs. Pinto Correia held the positions of advisor to the Board of PT International Investments in 2007, chairman and legal representative of CTTC-Archway/Beijing from 2005 until 2007, member of the board of directors of PT Asia from 2005 until 2007, responsible for business development in Asia and Brasil for CLSBE Executive Education from 2012 until 2015, supervisor of Directel (Yellow Pages) Cosmos and Telesat (technical support for MCTV) activities from 2005 until 2007, CEO of Macau Cable TV from 2005 until 2007, director of client satisfaction and service quality at PT-SGPS in 2004, director of knowledge management and communication at PT Comunicações in 2003, head of office of OGILVYONE Portugal from 1994 until 2002), publisher of the Portugal edition of the Marie Claire magazine from 1992 until 1994), account director at McCann Direct and director of client service at McCann-Erickson Lisbon from 1987 until 1992, product manager & director of the Direct Mail Office at CTT – Correios de Portugal from 1981 until 1987. Mrs. Pinto Correia holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics, a master’s degree in business by Nova School of Business and an MBA by Wharton School.

Nuno Rocha dos Santos de Almeida e Vasconcellos. Mr. Vasconcellos has served as an alternate member of ourOi’s board of directors since September 2015.2018. He is currentlyhas approximately 30 years of experience in the chairmanfinancial sector, specifically in mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring, private equity investments and public share issuances and has participated in various boards of directors in both Brazil and abroad. In 2004, he founded Iposeira Capital Ltda., an independent company specializing in corporate advisory in Brazil. He was a partner at Lakeshore Partners from March 2013 to December 2014 and a founding partner of the board of directorsSTK Capital from 2010 to 2013. From June 2003 to June 2008, he served as Senior Representative in Brazil of the following companies: Rocha dos Santos Holding SGPS S.A., Ongoing Strategy Investments SGPS S.A., Ongoing TMT, Ongoing Media, Ongoing Energy, Económica SGPS, RS Holding SGPS, Insight Strategic Investments SGPS S.A., Ongoing Comunicações e Participações S.A.,Special Operations Area of the International Finance Corporation – IFC, where he worked on credit recovery and Heidrick & Struggles. Mr. Vasconcellosequity investments in Brazil and managed a portfolio of approximately US$300 million. From September 2002 to January 2003, he was first electedDirector of the BNDES Industry Segment, responsible for the bank’s projects with companies in the industry, commerce and services sectors, and from October 2001 to August 2002 he served as an executive officerSuperintendent of Pharol in 2006 and was reelected in 2012 and 2015.the BNDES Fixed Income Segment, where he oversaw the department’s restructuring. He served as director of BNDESPAR, a subsidiary of BNDES, from April 1998 to September 2001, where he was responsible for the chairmanareas of investments and divestitures, including corporate restructuring, asset portfolio management, development of structured operations in the boarddomestic and international markets, structuring of directors of Rocksun S.A. from 2008 to 2012, member of the general council of ISCTE from 2009 to 2011, member of the board of executive officers of Automóvel Clube de Portugal from 2007 to 2011, managing partner of the consulting area of Heidrick & Struggles in Portugal from 1995 to 2006private equity funds and officer of Andersen Consulting (current Accenture) from 1987 to 1995.governance. Mr. Vasconcellos holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Curry College in Boston.

Sérgio Bernstein. Mr. Bernstein has served as an alternate member of our board of directors since April 2014. Mr. Bernstein is a member of the board of directors of Iguatemi Empresa de Shopping Centers S.A., a holding company that invests in other companies. He began his career as a trainee in the finance department of General Electric do Brasil in 1961, where he eventually served as director controller for six years and vice-president of finance for four years. He also served as vice-president of finance of Grupo Jereissati from 1990 until 2007, chairman of the fiscal council of TNL from May 2009 until February 2012 and member of the fiscal council of Coari from September 2009 until February 2012. Mr. Bernstein holds a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Escola Nacional de Engenharia do Rio de Janeiro.

Marcos Grodetzky.Mr. Grodetzky has served as an alternate member of our board of directors since September 2015). He currently is an independent member of the board of directors, audit committee, and nominating committee of Smiles S.A., CentroPilgrim’s Pride Corporation and has served as a member of the boards of directors of Cremer, Sendas, Aracruz Celulose, Vale, Marlim Participações, Companhia Distribuidora de Cultura JudaicaGas do Rio de Janeiro – CEG and Eneva S.A.,Santos Brasil Participações. He also served as Vice President of Property from June 2014 until June 2015 and the CFOasVice-President of União Israelita BrasileiraFinance until 2019 at Clube de Regatas do Bem Estar Social - UNIBES,Flamengo. He holds a philanthropic nonprofit organization, senior advisor to Banco UBS,degree in Economics and a founding memberpost-graduate degree in Finance from the Pontifical Catholic University of Mediator Assessoria Empresarial Ltda. Until October 2013,Rio de Janeiro. He also holds a masters in Sports Management from the Cruyff Institute.

Roger Solé Rafols. Mr. Grodetzky served as CEOSolé has more than 20 years of DGB S.A., a logistics holding companyexperience in telecommunications, in the areas of Grupo Abril S.A.marketing, product development, innovation, strategy and parent companyP&L management. He has been Vice-President of Marketing at Sprint Corporation since 2015. Prior to that time, he held the following companies: Dinap - Dist. Nacional de Publicações, Magazine Express Comercial Imp e Exp de Revistas, Entrega Fácil Logística Integrada, FC Comercial e Distribuidora, Treelog S.A. - Logística e Distribuição, DGB Logística e Distribuição Geográfica,positions: Vice-President of Marketing from 2009 to 2015, and TEX Courier (Total Express). In addition, he servedManager of Consumer Marketing from 2009 to 2011 at TIM Brasil; and Marketing Manager – Residential Segment from 2006 to 2008, and Manager of Value Adding Products and Services from 2001 to 2006 at Vivo. He also worked at DiamondCluster, known today as

finance and investor relations vice-president of Telemar/Oi, Aracruz Celulose/Fibria, and Cielo S.A Oliver Wyman, from 2002 until 2010. He1996 to 2001. Mr. Solé holds a bachelor’s degree in economicsBusiness and a Master’s in Business Administration from ESADE – Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas, Barcelona, and a Master’s degree in Management of Audiovisual Companies from UPF – Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Instituto Desarrollo Continuo (IDEC), Barcelona. He also completed an exchange MBA program at UCLA – University of California, Los Angeles; an Advanced Management Program at IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, São Paulo-Barcelona; and a short executive education program in Finance and Strategy for Value Creation at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Claudia Quintella Woods.Ms. Woods has more than 20 years of experience in strategic planning, marketing and sales, digitalstart-ups and multinational companies. She has been the General Manager of Uber Brasil since February 2019 and has also acted as Retail Director of Banco Original and as Executive Superintendent of Digital Channels (Corporate and Retail) of the aforementioned bank. Prior to that, she held the positions of Chief Executive Officer of Webmotors.com, Marketing and Digital Product Director of Walmart.com, Chief Executive Officer of Netmovies, Chief Marketing and Intelligence Officer for Latin America of Clickon, General Manager of Predicta, Senior Product Group Manager of L’Oréal Brazil, Relationship Marketing Manager of Ibest Company and Senior Consultant of Kaiser Associates. Ms. Woods holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Bowdoin College, with double major in Environmental Sciences and Spanish and minor in Economics. She holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the COPPEAD Institute of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ) and attended the Senior Management Program at INSEAD/FDC.a certificate of executive education on Building Ventures in Latin America from Harvard Business School.

Pedro Zañartu Gubert Morais Leitão.Armando Lins Netto. Mr. Leitão has served as an alternate member of our board of directors since September 2015. HeNetto has been CEO of Fleetcor in Brazil since June 2014 responsible for all businesses and companies in the chairmanregion. He was also Vice President of TIVIT, a Brazilian multinational in digital services, responsible for IT services and businesses. Before that, he was Director of the board of directors of Prio Energy SGPS since May 2015, where he also served as chairman of the executive committee. He served as chairman of the board of directors of ONI SGPS from 2012 to 2013, administrator of UnyLeya BrasilBanking Practice at Unysis and UnyLeya Portugal from 2010 to 2011.management consultant with McKinsey & Company at São Paulo and London offices. Mr. Leitão currently holds non-executive roles, including at MoteDAlma SGPS since 2009, Villas Boas ACE, S.A. since 2012, and FikOnline Ltda. since 2003. Ha previously held other non-executive roles, including at Quifel Natural Resources, S.A. from 2007 to 2012 and MegaFin S.A. from 2009 to 2012. Mr. LeitãoNetto holds a bachelor’s degree in business administrationMechanical Engineering from Universidade Católica Portuguesa andFederal do Pará (UFPA – 1990), a master’s degree in business administrationMechanical Engineering from Kellogg Graduate Schoolthe Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP – 1993) and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Management at Northwestern University.California, Berkeley (UCB – 1999).

Executive Officers

OurThe board of executive officers is ourOi’s executive management body. OurOi’s executive officers are ourOi’s legal representatives and are responsible for ourOi’s internal organization andday-to-day operations and the implementation of the general policies and guidelines established from time to time by ourOi’s board of directors.

Our Oi’sby-laws require that the board of executive officers consist of between three and six members, including a chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, investor relations officer and chief legal officer. Our Oi’sby-laws provide that ourOi’s chief executive officer may not serve as chairman of ourOi’s board of directors. Each officer is responsible for business areas that ourOi’s board of directors assigns to them. The members of our board of executive officers,them and, other than ourOi’s chief executive officer and ourOi’s chief financial officer, need not have no formal titles (other than the title of executive officer or “Diretor”).

TheGenerally, the members of ourOi’s board of executive officers are elected by ourOi’s board of directors fortwo-year terms and are eligible for reelection. The current term of all of our executive officers ends on the date of our first board of directors’ meeting following our annual shareholders’ meeting in 2016. OurOi’s board of directors may remove any executive officer from office at any time with or without cause. According to the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, executive officers must be residents of Brazil but need not be shareholders of our company. OurOi. Oi’s board of executive officers holds meetings when called by ourOi’s chief executive officer or any two other members of ourOi’s board of executive officers.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of ourOi’s board of executive officers.

 

Name

Position

Date Elected/
Appointed

Age

Bayard De Paoli GontijoName

PositionDate Elected/
Appointed
Age

Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu

  Chief Executive Officer  January 20152020  4350

Flavio Nicolay GuimarãesCamille Loyo Faria

  

Chief Financial Officer and
Investor Relations Officer

October 201946

Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho

  April 2015Chief Legal Officer  40October 201944

Eurico De Jesus Teles Neto

Chief Legal Officer

May 2016

58

Jason Santos InácioJosé Claudio Moreira Gonçalves

  Executive Officer without
specific designation
  January 2014March 2018  4153

Marco Norci SchroederBernardo Kos Winik

  Executive Officer without
specific designation
  April 2015March 2018 51

Summarized below is information regarding the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of ourOi’s current executive officers.

Bayard De Paoli GontijoRodrigo Modesto de Abreu. Mr. GontijoAbreu has served as our chief executive officerOi’s Chief Executive Officer since January 2015February 2020, having previously served as Chief Operational Officer since September 2019. Prior to joining Oi, he was Chief Executive Officer of Quod, a big data company focused on credit risk analysis, beginning in June 2017. He was Managing Partner of Giau Consultoria Empresarial Ltda, a boutique management consulting firm, from November 2016 to November 2017, and ourwas at the same time member of the board of directors of Vogel Soluções em Telecomunicações e Informática S.A., which operates fiber optic telecommunication services. From March 2013 to May 2016, he was the Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of TIM Participações S.A. and Chief Executive Officer of TIM Celular S.A. From December 2008 to March 2013, he served as President of the Brazilian operations of Cisco Systems, one of the largest information technology companies globally. Prior to that, Mr. Abreu was also Managing Director of Cisco Systems for the North of Latin America and the Caribbean from May 2006 to December 2008, President of Nortel Networks Brazil, a telecommunications equipment company, from June 2004 to April 2006, and Chief Executive Officer of Promon Tecnologia Ltda., a technology services company, from July 2000 to June 2004. Mr. Abreu holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas and an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Camille Loyo Faria. Ms. Loyo Faria has served as Oi’s chief financial officer and investor relations officer since June 2013. Mr. GontijoOctober 2019. Ms. Loyo Faria previously served as our interim chiefDirector of Energy, Technology, Media, Telecom and Industries at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Previously, she held director positions, through which she was responsible for energy, technology, media and telecom at Bradesco BBI and Morgan Stanley. Ms. Loyo Faria also has extensive executive officer between October 2014 and January 2015, and has served as one of our executive officers since

April 2012. Mr. Gontijo started working at Oi as Treasury Manager in 2003. Mr. Gontijo has over 23 years’ experience in the financial markettelecommunications and since 1993, works with large companiesinfrastructure sector, having held positions as Chief Executive Officer of Multiner, Chief Financial Officer of Terna Participações and banks such as Banco Bamerindus do Brasil S.A, HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.,Strategy Leader at Embratel and NET Serviços de Comunicações S.A. Mr. GontijoTelecom Italia Group in Brazil and Latin America. Ms. Loyo Faria holds a degree in business administration andchemical engineering from Pontífica Universidade Católica in Rio de Janeiro, an MBA degree in finance from Coppead / UFRJ.Ibmec in Rio de Janeiro and a master’s degree in industrial engineering from Pontífica Universidade Católica in Rio de Janeiro.

Flavio Nicolay GuimarãesAntonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho. Mr. GuimarãesRabelo Filho has served as ourOi’s chief financial officer and investor relationslegal officer since April 2015. Previously,October 2019. Mr. Rabelo Filho began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers Brasil, which he left for Oi in 2000, where he held financial and legal positions, most recently in the Tax Law Directorate from 2007 to 2017. Since 2017, Mr. Rabelo Filho has been a partner at Andrade Rabelo Advogados Associados and played an active role in Oi’s judicial reorganization process and served as our treasury director from May 2010 to April 2015, regional corporate treasurer at Noble Brasil S.A. from 2008 to 2010the foreign representative of Oi’s Judicial Reorganization in the courts of New York and treasury manager at Brookfield Brasil form 2006 to 2008.the United Kingdom. Mr. GuimarãesRabelo Filho has also held leadership positions on the board of the main technical associations in the telecommunications sector and is a member of the National and State Commissions of Tax Law and Judicial Recovery and Bankruptcy of the Brazilian Bar Association. Mr. Rabelo Filho holds a law degree from the Federal University of Bahia, a graduate degree in Business Law from IBMEC/RJ and a master’s degree in Tax Law from Pontífica Universidade Católica in São Paulo.

José Claudio Moreira Gonçalves. Mr. Gonçalves has served as a trader at CSN - Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional from 2003 to 2006Oi’s chief operating officer since March 2018. He built his career in the telecommunications industry and Ford Motor Company Brasil fromhas expertise in the operation, maintenance and technological development of Oi’s networks. Mr. Gonçalves previously served as Oi’s executive director of operations since June 2011. He joined Oi in March 2000, to 2003. Hehaving served as operations manager, director of network deployment and director of engineering. Mr. Gonçalves holds a bachelor’s degree in foreign trademechanical production engineering from Faculdades Associadas de SãPontifícia Universidade Católica(PUC-Rio), a master’s degree in business administration from Fundação PauloGetúlio Vargas(FGV-RJ), an executive MBA from Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC) and a specialization inpost-executive MBA from the executive development program from The WhartonKellogg School University of Pennsylvania.Management.

Eurico de Jesus Teles NetoBernardo Kos Winik. Mr. TelesWinik has served as ourOi’s chief legalcommercial officer since May 2016, having previously served as one of our executive officers from April 2012 until May 2016. He was a member of our board of directors from 2009 to 2011 and an alternate member of our board of directors until April 2012.March 2018. He previously served as memberOi’s director of retail since December 2014 and director of retail sales from September 2011 to December 2014. He has experience in the board of directors of Coari from 2009 until February 2012technology, consulting and has been a member of the board of directors of Telemar from 2009 until its terminationtelecommunications markets, having worked in 2012. He was the legal officer of TNL from April 2007 through February 2012companies such as Claro, BS Consulting, NCR and the legal manager of Telemar from April 2005 until April 2007. He previously served as manager of the securities division at Telecomunicações de Bahia S.A., where he went on to hold the position of legal consultant in 1990.EDS do Brasil. Mr. TelesWinik holds a bachelor’s degree in economic sciencesinformation technology form Universidade Mackenzie and law from Universidade Católica de Salvador and holds a master’spost-graduate degree in Employment Lawbusiness from Universidade EstácioEscola de Sá.

Marco Norci Schroeder. Mr. Schroeder has served as one of our executive officers since April 2015. He has also served as the financial officer of our international operations since July 2014 and was elected as vice president and chief financial officer of PT Portugal in August 2014. Previously, Mr. Schroeder has served as chief financial officer and investor relations officer of Contax Participações from 2011 to 2013, a member of the board of directors of FundaçAdministração Sistel from 2009 to 2012, officer of the controlling area of Telemar Norte Leste S.A. from 2002 to 2011, chief financial officer of Televisãde Empresas de São Gaucha S.A. from 1991 to 1997, chief financial officer of Televisão Cidade S.A. from 1999 to 2001 and officer of the controlling area of Net Controller from 1998 to 1999. He chairs the fiscal council of FATL. Mr. Schroeder holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and a specialization in the general management program at Harvard Business School.Paulo (EAESP/FGV).

Fiscal Council

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law requires usOi to establish a permanent ornon-permanent fiscal council(conselho fiscal).Our Oi’sby-laws provide for a permanent fiscal council composed of between three and five members and their respective alternate members. The fiscal council is a separate corporate body independent of ourOi’s board of directors, ourOi’s board of executive officers and ourOi’s independent accountants. The primary responsibility of the fiscal council is to review ourOi’s management’s activities and ourOi’s financial statements and to report their findings to ourOi’s shareholders.

The members of ourOi’s fiscal council are elected by ourOi’s shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting forone-year terms and are eligible for reelection. The terms of the members of ourOi’s fiscal council expire at the annual shareholders’ meeting in 2017.2020. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the fiscal council may not contain members

who are members of ourOi’s board of directors or ourOi’s board of executive officers, spouses or relatives of any member of ourmemberof Oi’s board of directors or ourOi’s board of executive officers, or our employees. To be eligible to serve on ourOi’s fiscal council, a person must be a resident of Brazil and either be a university graduate or have been a company officer or fiscal council member of another Brazilian company for at least three years prior to election to ourOi’s fiscal council. Holders of preferred sharesPreferred Shares without voting rights andnon-controlling common shareholders that together hold at least 10.0% of ourOi’s voting share capital are each entitled to elect one member and his or her respective alternate to the fiscal council.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of ourOi’s fiscal council and their alternates.

 

Name

  

Position

 

Member Since

  AgeMember
Since

Allan Kardec de Melo Ferreira

 ChairmanAge February 200969

Piero Carbone

AlternateApril 201660

José Cláudio Rego Aranha

MemberApril 201668

Álvaro Bandeira

AlternateApril 201665

Pedro Wagner Pereira Coelho

  MemberChairman April 2016 6771

Patricia Valente Stierli

AlternateApril 201964

Álvaro Bandeira

MemberApril 201669

Wiliam da Cruz Leal

  Alternate April 20162018 5963

Manuel Jeremias Leite Caldas(1)Daniela Maluf Pfeiffer

 Member March 2013 60April 201849

Marissa Rose Vegele RenaudLuiz Fernando Nogueira

 Alternate April 2016 26April 201953

Raphael Manhães Martins(1)

MemberApril 201937

Domenica Eisenstein Noronha(1)

AlternateApril 201843

 

(1)

Elected by theOi’s preferred shareholders.

We summarize below the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of the current members of ourOi’s fiscal council and their alternates.

Fiscal Council Members

Allan Kardec de Melo Ferreira.Mr. Ferreira has served as chairman of our fiscal council since February 2009. He has also served as an alternate member of the fiscal council of TmarPart since April 2006 and a member of the fiscal council of TNL from April 2002 through February 2012. From 1971 to 1993, he was an in-house counsel with Construtora Andrade Gutierrez. His current activities include management consultancy services to a number of companies in the civil, commercial and tax areas, participation in corporate restructuring processes (mergers, spin-offs, disposals, sale of assets) of the telecommunications companies of the Andrade Gutierrez Group and in several bidding processes conducted by the Minas Gerais Roads Department (Departamento de Estrada de Rodagem de Minas Gerais), the Belo Horizonte Traffic Department (Empresa de Transporte e Trânsito de Belo Horizonte), the Ministry of Communications and ANATEL. He holds a degree in law from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, in addition to having participated in several extension courses in foreign trade, in particular export services, at Fundação Centro de Comércio Exterior, FDC, Foreign Trade Ministry, and Construtora Andrade Gutierrez.

José Cláudio Rego Aranha. Mr. Aranha has served as a member of our fiscal council since April 2016. He served as a member of the independent committee of Brazil Telecom July 2011 until August 2011, a member of the independent committee of Açúcar Guarani April 10 until July 2010 and a member of the independent committee for JBS October 2009 until January 2010. Previously, he was a director of Banco Nossa Caixa Capital Markets from September 2009 until December 2009, investment analyst, manager and head of department of BNDESPAR from 1979 until 2008, advisor to the Board Finance and Infrastructure and Superintendent of Fixed Income Area of BNDES from 1983 until 2002, project analyst at PETROQUISA from 1976 until 1979, planning engineer at Promom ENGINEERING from 1974 until 1976, project analyst at Natron Engineering in 1973, engineer at Caterpillar Brazil Services from 1972 until 1973 and project analyst at Tecnometal from 1971 until 1972. Mr. Aranha holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial mechanical engineering from the School of Engineering Fluminense Federal University, a graduate degree in industrial management from the Research Institute for Management Science in Delft, Holland and an executive MBA in business administration from COPEAD.

Pedro Wagner Pereira Coelho. Mr. Coelho has served as a memberchairman of ourOi’s fiscal council since April 2017 and member since April 2016. He has also servesserved as chairman of the fiscal council of Magnesita S.ARefratários S.A. since April 2008, as member of the fiscal council of Parnaiba Gas Natural Gas S.AS.A. since October 2015 and as member of the supervisory board of EstacioEstácio Participações S.AS.A. since April 2012. Mr. Coelho was also a partner of Carpe Diem - Consulting, Business Planning and Consulting– Consultoria, Planejamento e Assessoria Empresarial Ltda. from 2011 until 2016. He worked as controller at Investment BankBanco de Investimentos Garantia S.AS/A., investment bank, from May 1982 until July 1997 at and as an auditor at Pricewaterhouse Coopers Independent AuditorsPricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes from October 1978 to April 1981. Previously, he was chairman of the fiscal council of Lojas Americanas S.A,S.A., Tele Norte Leste Participações SA,S.A., Telemar Participações S.A,S.A., TAM S.AS.A. and Enersul - Energy of SouthEmpresa Energética de Mato Grosso.Grosso do Sul S.A. (Enersul). Mr. Coelho holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University SocietySociedade Universitária Augusto Motta - SUAM and in accounting from SOMLEI.

Manuel Jeremias Leite Caldas. Mr. Caldas has served as a member of our fiscal council since March 2013. He has been a consultant at Alto Capital GestãoSociedade Madeira de Recursos since 2007 and a partner at Argucia Capital Gestão de Recursos Ltda. since 2012. In addition, he served as manager of the technical department of Banco PEBB S.A. from 1996 to 2006, research manager at Banco Gulfinvest S.A. from 1994 to 1995, manager of the economics department at Banco Nacional S.A. from 1991 to 1994, financial analyst at Banco Bozano Simonsen S.A. from 1990 to 1991, engineer at Light Serviços de Eletricidade S.A. from 1981 to 1990 and engineer at Promon in 1981. Mr. Caldas has served as a member of the board of directors of Eletropaulo Metropolitana Eletricidade de São Paulo S.A. since April 2012, an alternate member of the board of directors of Contax Holdings since 2012 and São Carlos Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. from 2011 to 2013, member of the board of directors of Forjas Taurus from 20013 until 2015; a member of the fiscal council of Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A.LeyEletrobras since 2012 until 2015. He also served as a member of the fiscal council of Companhia Energética do Rio Grande do Norte (Cosern) from 2009 to 2011, , member of the fiscal council of Oi from 2013 until 2015, member of the fiscal council of Cesp since 2013 until 2016, member of the fiscal council of Eneva since 2015 until 2016 an member of the fiscal council of Tegma logistica from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Caldas holds a bachelor’s degree in business management from UERJ, a degree in electrical engineering from Instituto Militar de Engenharia – IME and a master’s degree and PhD in economics from EPGE - Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Alternate Fiscal Council Members

Piero Carbone. Mr. Carbone has served as an alternate member of our fiscal council since April 2016. He also currently serves as a member of the supervisory board of the following companies: Ciapam Cia. Agropastoril Mucuri since 2015, Gado e Cana de Açúcar Fontes Agropecuária S.A. since 2015, Gado e Cana de Açúcar Itaguay Imobiliária e Participações S.A. since 2015, Condor S.A. since 2014, Industry of non-lethal weapons Risk Office S.A. since 2014 and Cultura Inglesa S.A. since 2011. Previously, he worked in accounting at Telemar and Oi from May 1999 to June 2011 and as an audit trainee at PricewaterhouseCoopers from 1978 to 1998. Mr. Carbone holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University Santa Ursula, an MBA in business management from Fundação Dom Cabral and a degree in executive education at the University Estacio de Sá.SOMLEY.

Álvaro Bandeira. Mr. Bandeira has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2017 and as an alternate member of ourOi’s fiscal council since April 2016. He has also served as chief economist of Brokerage Modalmais since 2015, the year he joined the institution. Mr. Bandeira also served as chief economist of Orama from 2011 untilto 2015 and held various positions at Ágora Corretora from April 2001 tountil December 2010. He was president of the Brazilian Futures Exchange, (BBF), president of regional chapters of APIMEC for five administrations, Director of BVRJ and BM&F, as well as former full member of the Supervisory Board of Souza Cruz. Mr. Bandeira has spoken in several conferences related to the capital markets and personal finance and has developed lectures at universities and companies on related issues. He regularly contributes to publications regarding economics, and on financial education websites including Dinheirama and Infomoney. Mr. Bandeira holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from UFRJ and a graduate degree in administration from Coppe-RUFRJ.Coppe –RUFRJ.

Daniela Maluf Pfeiffer.Mrs. Pfeiffer has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2018. She is a partner at DXA Investments, an asset management firm, since January 2018. She was a partner at Canepa Asset Brasil, also funds management company, and was responsible for investors’ relations from January 2014 to October 2017. She previously worked as a partner at Nova Gestão de Recursos, an investment firm, from October 2011 to June 2013. Mrs. Pfeiffer is not a member of any management body of a publicly-held company. She was previously a member of the fiscal council of Banco Sofisa S.A. from April 2014 to April 2017; a member of the fiscal council of Viver Incorporadora e Construtora S.A. from April 2011 to April 2017; a member of the fiscal council of Banco Panamericano S.A. from September 2010 to April 2014; a member of the fiscal council of Santos Brasil S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Brasil Telecom S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Telemig Celular S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Amazônia Celular S.A., or Amazônia, from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Fiscal Council of Amazônia from 1998 to 2002 and a member of the fiscal council of Telemig Celular S.A. from 1998 to 200. She is an IBGC-certified fiscal council member. Mrs. Pfeiffer holds a degree in administration by UFRJ from 1992 and an MBA in corporate management from FGV.

Raphael Manhães Martins.Mr. Martins has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2019. He has been a partner at the law firm Faoro & Fucci since 2010. In 2010, he was a professor at UFRJ. From 2007 to 2009, he was a professor at Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Mr. Martins has served as a member of the board of directors of Eternit S.A. since 2015, Light S.A. since 2018 and Condor S.A. – Indústria Química since 2017. He has also served as a member of the fiscal council of Vale S.A. since 2015. Previously, Mr. Martins served as a member of the fiscal council of Light S.A. from 2014 to 2018 and Embratel Participações S.A. in 2014. Mr. Martins is a member of the Brazilian Bar Association, Rio de Janeiro Section(OAB-RJ).

Alternate Fiscal Council Members

Patricia Valente Stierli.Mrs. Valente has served as an alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2019. Mrs. Valente is a member of the fiscal council of Eletrobras – Centrais Elétricas S.A., as a financial specialist (since 2017), a member of the board of directors of PPE Fios Esmaltados S.A. (since 2018), a member of the fiscal council of Sociedade Beneficiente de Senhoras – Hospital Sírio Libanês (tenured from 2018 to 2021) and an alternate member of the fiscal council of Centro de Integração Empresa Escola CIEE (since 2018). Mrs. Valente previously served as a member of the fiscal council of Bardella S.A. Indústrias Mecânicas, (from 2015 to October 2018, a member of the board of directors of Pettenati S.A. Indústria Têxtil (during 2015), an alternate member of the fiscal council of Dohler S.A. (from 2017 to 2018) and a member of the board of directors and fiscal council of publicly-held companies, as a minority shareholders’ representative. In addition, Mrs. Valente has experience managing third-party resources, after having been a statutory officer at Banco Fator S.A. and Sadefem Equipamentos for six years, working in management and being in charge of institutional and retail clients. She also worked as a financial officer at Montagens S.A., where she was in charge of accounting, fiscal, budget, treasury and human resources. Mrs. Valente holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Fundação Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV) and completed a Management for Graduates specialization course at CEAG (MBA)—EAESP / FGV and her specialization in controllership course at GVPEC.

Wiliam da Cruz Leal.Mr. Leal has served as an alternate member of ourOi’s fiscal council since April 2016.2018. He has served asextensive experience in corporate governance, corporate sustainability, enterprise risk management, internal controls, technology and information security. Since 2011 he has been a managing partner ofat Cruz Leal Gestão Empresarial Ltda. since 2011, a consulting firm specialized in motivation, leadership, technology, corporate governance and sustainability. He has been a board member certified by IBGC -the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC) since 2009. HePreviously, Mr. Leal worked at Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., from 2000 to 2009, servinghaving served as executive manager of corporate governance, internal controls manager, budget and special projects manager and systems audit. Previously, he served asaudit manager. He also worked at Banco do Brasil S.A., from 1975 to 2000, having served as executive manager of changes and

as an analyst information technology consultant at Banco do Brasil S.A. from 1975 until 2000.consultant. Mr. Leal holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Fundação de Ensino Superior de Itaúna, Minas Gerais.

Marissa Rose Vegele RenaudLuiz Fernando Nogueira.. Ms. Renaud Mr. Nogueira has served as an alternate member of ourOi’s fiscal council since April 2016. She2019. Since May 2016, Mr. Nogueira has served as partnerchief financial officer of Agruciacapital Gestão de Recursos Ltda. since May 2015. Previously, sheNeogas, having previously served as achief financial analystofficer of Agruciacapital Gestão de Recursos Ltda. from November 2012 until April 2015,Brookfield Renewable Energy, Ferroport, Concremat, Bematech and Timnet (a TIM group company). In addition, he also served as operationsexecutive manager investor relations at Petrobras and processing assistant of Prosper SA Corretora de Valores e Cambio from March 2012 until November 2012planning and as intern from August 2010 until March 2012. Ms. Renaudcontrol manager for Latin America at IBM. Mr. Nogueira holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Pontifícia Universidade Candido Mendes.Católica, a post-graduate degree in financial management from Fundação Getúlio Vargas and an MBA in finance from IBMEC, and he completed a training course in conflict mediation at Mediare.

Domenica Eisenstein Noronha. Ms. Noronha has served on Oi’s fiscal council since April 2018 (as a member since April 2018 and as an alternate member since April 2019). Mrs. Noronha has more than 19 years of experience in the financial industry. Since 2010, she has been a member of Tempo Capital Gestão de Recursos Ltda., an independent fund manager focused on the Brazilian equity market. Her responsibilities include economic and financial analysis of investments, investor relations, supervision of compliance and regulatory review. Previously, Mrs. Noronha worked for 11 years at Morgan Stanley in New York, where she was involved in M&A for Latin American companies, and São Paulo, where she was executive director responsible for equity and debt capital markets transactions. She served as a member of the fiscal council of the following publicly-held companies in Brazil: Fibria Celulose S.A., from February 2017 to April 2018; Usinas Siderúrgica de Minas Gerais S.A. – Usiminas, from April 2015 to April 2016 and from April 2017 to April 2018; and Embratel Participações S.A., from April 2012 to August 2014). Mr. Noronha holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Georgetown University, majoring in finance, international business and economics.

Compensation

According to our Oi’sby-laws, our Oi’s shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate compensation we pay to the members of ourOi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and members of our fiscal council. OurOi’s shareholders determine this compensation at theOi’s annual shareholders’ meeting. Once aggregate compensation is established, ourOi’s board of directors is responsible for distributing such aggregate compensation individually to the members of ourOi’s board of directors and ourOi’s board of executive officers in compliance with our Oi’sby-laws.

The aggregate compensation paid by us to all members of ourOi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and our fiscal council for services in all capacities during 2019 was R$25.6 million in 2015.64.5 million. This amount includes pension, retirement or similar benefits for ourOi’s officers and directors. On April 28, 2016, ourAt Oi’s 2020 annual shareholders’ meeting, Oi’s shareholders (acting in the annual general meeting) established the following compensation for the year 2016:2020:

 

board of directors (including aggregate directors):directors: an aggregate limit of approximately R$9.28.2 million;

 

board of executive officers: an aggregate limit of approximately R$29.469.6 million; and

 

fiscal council: an aggregate limitthe minimum amount established under Paragraph 3 of R$1.0 million.

We compensate our alternate directors on a monthly basis, and compensation is not contingent upon attendance at the meetingsArticle 162 of the board of directors. We compensateBrazilian Corporate Law.

Oi compensates alternate members of ourits fiscal council for each meeting of ourthe fiscal council that they attend.

OurOi’s executive officers receive the same benefits generally provided to our employees, such as medical (including dental) assistance, private pension plan and meal vouchers. Like our employees, our executive officers also receive an annual bonus equal to one-month’s salary (known as the “thirteenth” (monthly) salary in Brazil), an additional one-third of one-month’s salary for vacation, and contributions of 8.0% of their salary into a defined contribution pension fund known as the Guarantee Fund for Time of Service(Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço).Members of ourOi’s board of directors and fiscal council are not entitled to these benefits.

Members of ourOi’s board of directors board of executive officers and fiscal council are not parties to contracts providing for benefits upon thetheir termination. Some of our executive officers are entitled to severance payments in certain circumstances upon termination of employment other than, in the case of executive officers, the benefits described above.their contracts.

Long-Term Incentive Program

On March 13, 2015, ourOi’s board of directors approved a long-term incentive plan for certain executives of the company.Oi’s executives. The purpose of the long-term incentive plan is to encourage integration, align the interests of management with that of shareholders and retain our strategic executives in the medium- and long-term. The long-term incentive plan program will runran from 2015 until 2017. Compensation under the long-term incentive plan, calculated based on ourOi’s share price, will be madeand was paid in three annual installments in 2016, 2017 and 2018. As of December 31, 2015,During 2018 and 2017, we had recorded provisions in the amountpaid aggregate amounts of R$21021.8 million with respectand R$13.6 million, respectively, pursuant to our obligations under the long-term incentive plan.

People, Designation and Compensation Committee

Our People, Designation and Compensation Committee, orOn April 26, 2019, Oi’s shareholders approved two share-based long-term incentive plans for the Compensation Committee, organized in September 2015period from 2019 to supersede2021: one the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee, is an advisory committee to our board of directors. It meets every three months but may hold additional meeting if necessary. According to its internal regulations, the Compensation Committee is responsible for:

reviewing, recommending and monitoring strategies for developing and managing the talents and human capital of the Company and its subsidiaries;

preparing and periodically reviewing, in merely indicative terms, the selection criteria and summary of qualifications, knowledge and professional experience as a proper profile for performing functions as a member of an administrative body of the Company and its subsidiaries;

giving opinions on the profiles of candidates for member of our board of directors, officer and members of the Company advisory committees, in the processes of presenting candidates by theOi’s board of directors, and designation or substitution by the board of directors, considering that the hiring of officers that report to the chief executive officer must be informed in advance to this Compensation Committee;

taking part in discussions regarding major changes to the organizational structureother for certain executives. The purpose of the Company and its subsidiaries (first and second levels below the chief executive officer);

monitoring the succession programplan for the principal executives of the Company and its subsidiaries, recommending actions at the first management level and establishing directives for the succession program for other levels of the Company and its subsidiaries;

giving opinions on the appointment process to management of important subsidiaries;

analyzing, recommending and monitoring special programs, such as voluntary termination and early retirement, among others;

evaluating the strategy for developing and training third parties;

analyzing and recommending to the board of directors the policy for compensating members of bodies and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including fixed and variable remuneration, any type of incentive, benefits programs and stock options;

analyzing and recommending to the board of directors parameters for the bonus program for the Company and its subsidiaries;

analyzing and recommending to the board of directors compensation policies and practices for members of the board of directors itself, the advisory committees and the audit board, subjectis to the provisions of Art. 162, §3, of Law 6.404/76 and subsequent changes;

recommending defining goals for the Company and its subsidiaries and metrics and scale of variable annual compensation and for each term, especially, as a function of compliance with strategy, risk profile, plans and budget;

reviewing compliance of annual performance based on the defined goals;

reviewing and recommending a system of evaluation of performance, including its timing and methods;

preparing the annual evaluation of performancepromote high engagement levels of the members of the board of directors, to keep the members committed to supporting our meeting of our strategic goals, and officersto seek to align the members with our shareholders in relationthe medium and long term. The purpose of the plan for the executives is to promote a high level of commitment of these executives, to keep them committed in order to ensure the achievement of our strategic goals, approved byand to seek to align the executives with our shareholders for the medium and long term.

Under these plans, the board of directors reviewing the evaluationsis authorized to make annual grants of the high executives of the Company and its subsidiaries and submitting the evaluationCommon Shares to the board of directors;

recommending to the board of directors distribution of individual compensation by the members of the board of directors and officers;to our executives. The maximum number of Common Shares permitted to be granted is limited to 1.5% of the total capital stock of Oi as of April 26, 2019 under the plan for our executives, and

recommending strategy to 0.4% under the plan for the board of directors regarding pensiondirectors. Common Shares granted under these plans vest in equal amounts over a three year period, subject to conditions of continued employment and conditions related to the market valuation of our Common Shares.

At the time of the Company and its subsidiaries, particularly regarding extraordinary contributions to complementary retirement funds.

The Compensation Committee must be composedapproval of five to seven members appointedthese plans by theour shareholders, our board of directors decided that we would refrain from among its members following deliberation specificallyimplementing these plans until the RJ Court rendered a judgement regarding these plans. On December 20, 2019, the RJ Court ruled that the plan for this purpose, at the first meeting of the board of directors that takes place after the end of the members’ terms, with no hierarchy among the members, one of whom will be the coordinator. The current members of the Compensation Committee include members of our board of directors (Luís Palha, Thomas Reichenheim, Luiz Antonio Souto, Rafael Mora and Marten Pieters) and one alternate memberwould be suspended until the conclusion of the RJ Proceedings. On December 30, 2019, we made grants of 33,704,937 Common Shares to our executives. Following the conclusion of the RJ Proceedings, the plan for members of our board of directors (Jorge Cardoso). Allwill be implemented in the form approved on April 26, 2019.

Audit, Risks and Controls Committee

The Audit, Risks and Controls Committee (Comitê de Auditoria, Riscos e Controle), or the CARC, is a statutory advisory committee to our board of directors. According to its internal regulations, the CARC is responsible for:

advising our board of directors in connection with business risk assessment, internal control mechanisms and supervising internal audits;

promoting communications between the company’s administrative and supervisory bodies, independent auditors and the internal audit bodies;

supervising the management and control of contingencies; and

analyzing the quarterly information and the financial statements prepared periodically by the company, including the audited consolidated financial statements, as well as the management report and any analysis disclosed by management of our company’s financial condition and operating results.

The CARC must be composed of three to five members, all of whom must be members of Oi’s board of directors and meet the independence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act. According to article 32 of Oi’sby-laws, the members of the CARC are appointed by Oi’s board of directors.

Members of the CARC serve for atwo-year terms that coincide with the terms of the members of our board of directors. One of the Compensation Committee have been electedmembers is designated as the chairman of the CARC. The current members of the CARC are: Henrique José Fernandes Luz (chairman), Marcos Bastos Rocha, Marcos Grodetzky, Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior, and Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana.

The CARC is responsible for performing the functions of an audit committee set forth in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act, other than the engagement and dismissal of our independent auditors. Under Brazilian law, the function of engaging independent auditors is reserved for the board of directors. As a result, as specified in Section 3(a)(58) of the Exchange Act, our board of directors functions as our audit committee for the purpose of approving any engagement of our independent auditors for audit andnon-audit services provided to terms that expire atus or our annual general shareholders’ meeting to be held in April 2018.subsidiaries.

Share Ownership

As of May 13, 2016,April 24, 2020, the number of our commonCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares held by the members of ourOi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, supervisory or management bodies, including outstanding stock options, do not exceed 1% of either class of ourOi’s outstanding shares.

Employees

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had a total of 45,12558,089 employees. All of our employees are employed on a full-time basis, divided into the following functions: network operations, sales and marketing, information technology, call center operations and support areas and authorized agents.areas.

The table below sets forth a breakdown of our employees by main category of activity and geographic location as of the dates indicated:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Number of employees by category of activity:

    

Employees of Continuing Operations:

    

Plant operation, maintenance, expansion and modernization

   18,623     16,082     13,943  

Sales and marketing

   5,480     5,167     5,572  

Call center operations

   15,168     17,544     18,831  

Support areas

   4,599     3,649     3,939  

Authorized agents

   163     354     286  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Employees of continuing operations

   44,033     42,796     42,571  

Employees of available for sale operations

   1,092     —       —    

Employees of discontinued operations

   —       12,290     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   45,125     55,086     42,571  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of employees by geographic location:

    

Employees of Continuing Operations:

    

Brazil:

    

Rio de Janeiro

   20,125     14,356     13,285  

Goiás

   7,605     8,838     9,865  

Paraná

   3,802     4,322     4,527  

Mato Gross do Sul

   3,147     3,739     4,005  

São Paulo

   1,581     1,854     1,954  

Minas Gerais

   1,723     1,831     1,953  

Rio Grande do Sul

   737     1,195     957  

Bahia

   1,171     1,265     893  

Federal District

   603     741     799  

  Year Ended December 31,   December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2019   2018   2017 

Number of employees by category of activity:

      

Plant operation, maintenance, expansion and modernization

   36,149    34,620    33,019 

Sales and marketing

   4,808    5,131    5,069 

Call center operations

   15,046    14,993    13,202 

Support areas

   2,086    2,131    4,002 

Authorized agents

           154 
    

 

   

 

 

Total

   58,089    56,875    55,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Number of employees by geographic location:

      

Rio de Janeiro

   15,296    15,406    16,657 

Goiás

   7,708    7,666    6,795 

Paraná

   7,175    6,996    6,040 

Mato Gross do Sul

   3,542    3,818    3,077 

São Paulo

   1,470    1,630    1,612 

Minas Gerais

   1,437    1,544    1,506 

Rio Grande do Sul

   3,945    3,730    3,555 

Bahia

   4,115    3,345    3,439 

Federal District

   770    715    588 

Santa Catarina

   514     646     652     2,025    2,195    2,503 

Pernambuco

   495     802     601     2,185    2,108    1,756 

Ceará

   518     588     560     1,828    1,941    1,746 

Pará

   342     470     416     1,599    1,367    1,536 

Mato Grosso

   219     272     275     199    192    195 

Maranhão

   216     304     259     1,098    806    963 

Amazonas

   146     246     236     821    730    624 

Espírito Santo

   174     215     223     132    148    143 

Paraiba

   168     175     161     439    462    503 

Piauí

   118     138     146     601    522    572 

Rondônia

   106     134     143     88    89    86 

Rio Grande do Norte

   140     159     136     436    458    495 

Sergipe

   110     178     125     284    328    345 

Alagoas

   86     105     89     269    290    326 

Tocantins

   67     79     79     68    61    55 

Amapá

   41     54     61     251    154    153 

Acre

   45     50     50     39    40    40 

Roraima

   34     40     44     269    134    136 

United States, Bermuda, Venezuela and Colombia

   —       —       77  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total employees of continuing operations

   44,033     42,796     42,571  

Employees of Available for Sale Operations:

    

Portugal

   7     —       —    

Namibia

   540     —       —    

São Tomé and Principe

   97     —       —    

Timor Leste

   448     —       —    

Total employees of available for sale operations

   1,092     —       —    

Employees of Discontinued Operations:

    

Portugal

   —       10,701     —    

Namibia

   —       503     —    

Cape Verde Islands

   —       512     —    

São Tomé and Principe

   —       95     —    

Timor Leste

   —       479     —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total employees of discontinued operations

   —       12,290     —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   45,125     55,086     42,571     58,089    56,875    55,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

We negotiate separate collective bargaining agreements with three union committees each representing the local unions in each of theseveral Brazilian states for our company and each of our subsidiaries operating in such states. New collective bargaining agreements with these unions are negotiated every year. We maintain good relations with each of the unions representing our employees. As of December 31, 2015,2019, approximately 15%40.5%, respectively, of the employees of our company were members of state labor unions associated either with the National Federation of Telecommunications Workers (Federação Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações), or Fenattel, or with the Interstate Federation of Telecommunications Workers (Federação Interestadual dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações), or Fittel.. We have never experienced a strike that had a material effect on our operations.

Employee Benefits

Pension Benefit Plans

Sistel

Sistel is anot-for-profit private pension fund created by Telebrás in November 1977 to supplement the benefits provided by the federal government to employees of the former Telebrás System. The following are pension plans managed by Sistel.

PBS-A Plan

. Since the privatization of Telebrás, the Sistel Benefits Plan (Plano de Benefícios da Sistel – Assistidos), orPBS-A plan, a defined benefit plan, has been sponsored by the fixed-line telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás, including our company and TNL. ThePBS-A plan is self-funded and has been closed to new members since January 2000. Contributions to thePBS-A plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit and we are jointly and severally liable, along with other fixed-line telecommunications companies, for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of thePBS-A plan. As of December 31, 2015,2019, thePBS-A plan had a surplus of R$2,636.21,683 million. We were not required to make contributions to thePBS-A plan in 2015, 2014 or 2013.2019.

PBS-TNCP Plan

Since the privatization of Telebrás, our subsidiary Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A., or TNCP, has sponsored the Sistel Benefits Plan – TNCP (Plano de Benefícios da Sistel – TNCP), or PBS-TNCP plan. The PBS-TNCP plan has been closed to new members since April 2004. Contributions to the PBS-TNCP plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit. As a result of the corporate reorganization and TNL’s earlier acquisition of control of TNCP, we are liable for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of the PBS-TNCP plan. As of December 31, 2015, the PBS-TNCP plan had a surplus of R$25.4 million. We made contributions to the PBS-TNCP plan of less than R$1 million in each of 2015, 2014 and 2013.

CELPREV Plan

In March 2004, Amazônia Celular S.A., or Amazônia, a subsidiary of TNCP, began sponsoring the CelPrev Amazônia, or CELPREV, plan, a defined contribution plan managed by Sistel. The CELPREV plan was offered to employees of Amazônia who did not participate in the PBS-TNCP plan, as well as to its new employees. Participants in the PBS-TNCP plan were encouraged to migrate to the CELPREV plan. Approximately 27.3% of Amazônia’s active employees that were participants in the PBS-TNCP plan migrated to the CELPREV plan. As of December 31, 2015, the CELPREV plan had a surplus of R$2.4 million. We made contributions to the CELPREV plan of less than R$1 million in each of 2015, 2014 and 2013.

PAMA Plan and PCE Plan

Plan.Since the privatization of Telebrás, the Medical Assistance Plan to the Retired (Plano de Assistência Médica ao Aposentado), or PAMA, a health-care plan managed by Sistel, has been sponsored by the fixed-line telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás, including our company. The PAMA plan has been closed to new members since February 2000, other than new beneficiaries of current members and employees that are covered by thePBS-A plan who have not yet elected to join the PAMA plan. In December 2003, we and the other telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás began sponsoring the PCE –Special Coverage Plan, or the PCE plan, a health-care plan managed by Sistel. The PCE plan is open to employees that are covered by the PAMA plan. From February to July 2004, December 2005 to April 2006, June to September 2008, July 2009 to February 2010, March to November 2010, February 2011 to March 2012 and March 2012 until today, we offered incentives to our employees to migrate from the PAMA plan to the PCE plan.

In October 2015, in compliance with a court order, Sistel transferred the R$3,042 million surplus in thePBS-A plan to the PAMA plan to ensure the solvency of the PAMA plan. Of the total amount transferred, R$2,127 million is related to the plans sponsored by the company, apportioned proportionally to the obligations of the defined benefit plan.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the PAMA plan had a surplus of R$1,154 million.279million. We were not required to make contributions to the PAMA plan in 2015, 2014 or 2013.the year ended December 31, 2019.

Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social

FATL is anot-for-profit, independent private pension fund that manages pension plans for the employees of its plans’ sponsors.

PBS-TNCP Plan.Since the privatization of Telebrás, our subsidiary Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A., or TNCP, has sponsored the Sistel Benefits Plan – TNCP (Plano de Benefícios da Sistel – TNCP), orPBS-TNCP plan. ThePBS-TNCP plan has been closed to new members since April 2004. Contributions to thePBS-TNCP plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit. As a result of the corporate reorganization and TNL’s earlier acquisition of control of TNCP, we are liable for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of thePBS-TNCP plan. Since January 2016, thePBS-TNCP plan has been managed by FATL.

As of December 31, 2019, thePBS-TNCP plan had a surplus of R$24 million. We were not required to make contributions to thePBS-TNCP plan in the year ended December 31, 2019.

CELPREV Plan.In March 2004, Amazônia, a subsidiary of TNCP, began sponsoring the CelPrev Amazônia, or CELPREV plan, a defined contribution plan managed by Sistel. Since January 2016, the CELPREV plan has been managed by FATL. The CELPREV plan was offered to employees of Amazônia who did not participate in thePBS-TNCP plan, as well as to its new employees. Participants in thePBS-TNCP plan were encouraged to migrate to the CELPREV plan. Approximately 27.3% of participants in thePBS-TNCP plan migrated to the CELPREV plan. As of December 31, 2019, the CELPREV plan had a surplus of R$4 million. We were not required to make contributions to the CELPREV plan in the year ended December 31, 2019.

TCSPREV Plan

Plan.In December 1999, we and the other companies that participate in the plans managed by Sistel agreed to withdraw the active participants insponsorship of these plans and each company agreed to establish its own separate new plan for these participants. In February 2000, we began sponsoring the TCSPREV Plan,plan, a private definedvariable contribution pension plan and settled benefit plan offered to our employees that participated in the PBS-A plan and new employees who were employed by our company after the privatization of the Telebrás System.plan. Approximately 80% of our active employees that were participants in thePBS-A plan migrated to the TSCPREVTCSPREV plan. In March 2005, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada, or Fundação 14, a privatenot-for-profit pension fund created by Brasil Telecom Holding in 2004 to manage the TSCPREVTCSPREV plan, began managing the TSCPREVmanagingthe TCSPREV plan. In January 2010, FATL began managing the TSCPREVmanagingthe TCSPREV plan.

The TCSPREV plan offers three categories of benefits to its members: (1) risk benefits, which are funded according to the defined benefit method; (2) programmable benefits, which are funded according to the defined contribution method; and (3) proportional paid benefits, applicable to those employees who migrated to a defined contribution method with their rights reserved as contributors to the defined benefit system. This plan wasis closed to new participants in March 2003; however, we resumed offering programmable benefits under this plan to new employees beginning in March 2005.entrants. We are liable for any deficits incurred by the TCSPREV plan according to the existing proportion of the contributions we make to this plan. As of December 31, 2015,

In November 2018, the BrTPREV benefit plan was effectively merged into the TCSPREV benefit plan, had a surplusaccording to ordinance No.995 of R$1,061.4 million. We were not requiredthe National Superintendency of Complementary Social Security (Superintendência Nacional dePrevidência Complementar), dated October 24, 2018. With the recognition and registration of the merger, the participants and beneficiaries linked to make contributionsBrTPREV automatically became participants and beneficiaries of TCSPREV, in accordance with the categories of beneficiaries existing on the day prior to the TCSPREVmerger date.

The BrTPREV plan in 2015, 2014 or 2013.

BrTPREV Plan

In 2000, as a result of our acquisition of CRT, we assumed liability for retirement benefits to CRT’s employees by means of the creation of the Fundador/Alternativo plan, a defined benefit plan, which is managed by Fundação BrTPREV, a private not-for-profit pension fund created by CRT in 1971 to manage the CRT plans. This plan has been closed to new members since October 2002.

In October 2002, we began sponsoring the BrTPREV plan, a private defined contribution pension plan and settled benefit plan offered to our employees that participatedwe began sponsoring in the Fundador/Alternativo plan and new employees of our company.October 2002. Approximately 96% of our active employees that were participants in the Fundador/Alternativo plan (for which we assumed liability in 2000 as a result of our acquisition of CRT—Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações) migrated to the BrTPREV plan. ThisThe BrTPREV plan was offered to our new employees from March 2003 to February 2005, when it was closed to new participants. In March 2005, Fundação2012, as sponsor of the BrTPREV began managing these plans. In January 2010,plan, Oi entered into a financial obligation agreement with FATL began managing the Fundador/Alternativo plan andwith respect to deficits under the BrTPREV plan. In July 2012,We remain bound to this financial obligation contract. This obligation was classified as a Class I claim under the Fundador/Alternativo plan was merged into the BrTPREV plan, and participants and beneficiariesRJ Plan.

As a result of the Fundador/Alternativo plan automatically became membersRJ Proceedings, certain of the BrTPREV plan.

The BrTPREV plan offers three categories of benefits to its members: (1) risk benefits, which are funded according to the defined benefit method; (2) programmable benefits, which are funded according to the defined contribution method; (3) proportional paid benefits, applicable to those employees who migrated to a defined contribution method with their rights reserved as contributors to the defined benefit system. We are liable for any

deficits incurred by the BrTPREV plan according to the existing proportion of the contributions we make to this plan.our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded R$627 on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the BrTPREV plan had a deficitcommitment under the terms of R$541 million, which is being amortized through 2019. Since February 2003, we have been making additional monthly contributionsthe RJ Plan related to the Fundador/Alternativo planfinancial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the BrTPREV plan to reduce these deficits. During 2015, 2014 and 2013, we contributed R$139 million, R$123 million and R$117 million, respectively, to the BrTPREV plan and the Fundador/Alternativo plan to reduce these deficits.

BrTPREV Plan ended the year 2015 with a deficit of R$87 million, however, holds a significant portfolio of government securities (NTN-B) marked the maturity, ensured profitability higher than the actuarial targetpayment of the Plan.mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets.

As of December 31, 2019, the TCSPREV plan was balanced. This position alsois recognized by Resolution 16/2014 CNPC brings a slightly lower resultof the National Council of Supplementary Pensions (CNPC). We made contributions to the incorporated BrTPREV plan of less than recorded deficit. The net result of long position andR$1 million in the deficit is still a negative R$27 million, but close to only about 1.1% of total Mathematical Reservesyear ended December 31, 2019.

PBS-Telemar Plan.

PBS Telemar Plan

In September 2000, Telemar began sponsoring thePBS-Telemar plan, a private defined benefit plan offered to Telemar’s employees. In February 2005, FATL began managing the PBS TelemarPBS-Telemar plan. As a result of the corporate reorganization, we have assumed Telemar’s obligations under thePBS-Telemar plan.

ThePBS-Telemar plan has the same characteristics as thePBS-A plan. ThePBS-Telemar plan was closed to new participants in September 2000. We are responsible for any deficits incurred by thePBS-Telemar plan according to the existing proportion of the contributions we make to this plan and those made by participants.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, thePBS-Telemar plan had a surplus of R$33.5 million.65million. We made contributions to thePBS-Telemar plan of less than R$1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013.the year ended December 31, 2019.

TelemarPrev Plan

Plan.In September 2000, Telemar began sponsoring the TelemarPrev plan, a private definedvariable contribution pension plan and settled benefit plan offered to Telemar’s employees that participated in the PBS-Telemar plan and new employees who were employed by Telemar after the privatization of the Telebrás System.plan. Approximately 96% of Telemar’s active employees that were participants in thePBS-Telemar plan migrated to the TelemarPrev plan. In February 2005, FATL began managing the TelemarPrev plan. As a result of the corporate reorganization, we have assumed Telemar’s obligations under the TelemarPrev plan.

The TelemarPrev plan offers two categories of benefits to its members: (1) risk benefits, which are funded according to the defined benefit method; and (2) programmable benefits, which are funded according to the defined contribution method. We are liable for any deficits incurred by the TelemarPrev plan according to the proportion of the contributions we make to this plan.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the TelemarPrev plan had a surplus of R$482.9320 million. We madewere not required to make contributions to the TelemarPrev plan of less than R$1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013.

The TelemarPrev Plan ended the year 2015 with a deficit of R$94 million; however, because this plan holds a significant portfolio of government securities that are marked to maturity, assuring a return higher than the actuarial target of this plan. This position is higher than the deficit recorded, with a positive net result of R$74 million, recognized by Resolution National Council of Supplementary Pension (CNPC) No 16/2014.

PAMEC-BrT Plan

We also provide health care benefits for some retirees and pensioners that are members of the TCSPREV plan under the PAMEC-BrT plan, a defined benefit plan. The contributions for the PAMEC-BrT plan were fully paid in July 1998 through a single payment. In November 2007, the assets and liabilities of PAMEC-BrT were transferred from Fundação 14 to us, and we began managing the plan. As a result of the transfer, we do not recognize assets to cover current expenses and we fully recognize the actuarial obligations as liabilities. As ofended December 31, 2015, the PAMEC-BrT plan had a deficit of R$2.6 million. We made contributions to the PAMEC-BrT plan of less than R$1 million in each of 2015, 2014 and 2013.

For more information on our pension benefit plans, see note 22 to our consolidated financial statements.2019.

Medical, Dental and Employee Assistance Benefits

We provide our employees with medical and dental assistance, pharmacy and prescription drug assistance, group life insurance and meal, food and transportation assistance. We and our employees cover the costs of these benefits on a shared basis. In 2015,2019, we contributed R$125.3304 million to the medical and dental assistance plans, R$7.23 million to the occupational medicine plans, R$142.7333 million for the Worker’s Food Program (Programa de Alimentação do Trabalhador), or PAT, and R$22.288 million to the other benefits programs.

Profit Sharing Plans

Our collective bargaining agreementsThe operational targets are part of a profit sharing plan implemented by the Company as an incentive for employees to pursue our goals and to align employees’ interests with several labor unions require us to pay bonuses to employees who reach certainthose of our shareholders. Profit sharing occurs if financial and operational targets.targets defined annually by our board of directors are achieved. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had provisioned R$210.0247 million to be distributed in bonusesvariable compensation with respect to 2015.2019.

We also have implemented a profit sharing plan as an incentive for employees to pursue our goals and to align employees’ interests with those of our shareholders. Profit sharing occurs if economic value-added targetsoperational and otherfinancial targets defined annually by our board of directors are achieved.

Education and Training

We contribute to the professional qualification of our employees by offering training for the development of organizational and technical skills. In 2015,2019, we offered approximately 332,2004.9 million hours of training and we invested approximately R$2323.5 million in the qualification and training of our employees.

 

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

Oi has two outstanding classes of share capital: common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares with no par value. Generally, only Oi’s common sharesCommon Shares have voting rights. Oi’s preferred sharesPreferred Shares have voting rights only in exceptional circumstances. As of the date of this annual report, Preferred Shares have full voting rights pursuant to Oi’sby-laws as a result of Oi’s failure to make mandatory dividend payments since 2014. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy—Dividend Policy” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Description of Oi’sBy-laws—Voting Rights—Voting Rights of Preferred Shares.”

As of May 13, 2016, weApril 24, 2020, Oi had issued 668,033,661 common5,954,205,001 total shares, consisting of 5,796,477,760 issued Common Shares and 157,727,241 preferred shares,issued Preferred Shares, including 148,282,003 common shares30,595 Common Shares and 1,811,755 preferred sharesPreferred Shares held in treasury.

As of May 13, 2016, weApril 24, 2020, Oi had approximately 1.11.4 million shareholders, including 6551 U.S. resident holders of our common sharesCommon Shares (including the depositary of the Common ADS program) and approximately 835 U.S. resident holders of our preferred sharesPreferred Shares (including The Bankthe depositary of New York Mellon, as depositary under our American Depositary Receipt, or ADR, facilities)the Preferred ADS program). As of May 13, 2016,April 24, 2020, there were 99,329,988 common sharesapproximately 1.3 billion Common Shares (including common sharesCommon Shares represented by ADSs) and 76,478,434 preferred sharesapproximately 29 million Preferred Shares (including preferred sharesPreferred Shares represented by ADSs) held by U.S. resident holders.

The following table sets forth information concerning the ownership of our common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares as of May 13, 2016,April 24, 2020, by each person whom we know to be the owner of more than 5% of ourthe outstanding common shares of any class of Oi’s share capital, and by all of ourOi’s directors and executive officers as a group. Except for the shareholders listed below, we are not aware of any other of our shareholdersshareholder holding more than 5% of any class of ourOi’s share capital. OurOi’s principal shareholders have the same voting rights with respect to each class of ourOi’s shares that they own as other holders of shares of that class.

UnderWe have not sought to verify any information provided to us by our by-laws, any shareholder or group ofprincipal shareholders. The principal shareholders representing the same interest or bound by a voting agreement, that hold or may hold, in the future, aloneacquire, sell or jointly, interest in the company representing more than 15%otherwise dispose of our voting capital shallCommon Shares or Preferred Shares at any time and may have its voting rights limited to 15%acquired, sold or otherwise disposed of Common Shares or Preferred Shares since the date of the shares with voting rights, subject to certain exceptions. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Description of Our Company’s By-laws—Limitation on Voting Rights.” Pharol and its wholly owned subsidiary Bratel B.V. jointly hold more than 15% ofinformation reflected herein. Other information about our voting

capital stock, but, due to the limitation set forth in our by-laws, their vote is limited to 15% of our voting capital stock.principal shareholders may also change over time.

 

   Common Shares  Preferred Shares  Total 

Name

  Number of
Shares
   %  Number of
Shares
   %  Number of
Shares
   % 

Pharol(1)

   318,481,594     48.66    —       —      318,481,594     39.30  

Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan Board

   39,366,866     6.01    —       —      39,366,866     4.86  

BNDESPar

   38,254,636     5.84    —       —      38,254,636     4.72  

Blackrock

   —       —      7,888,717     5.06    7,888,717     0.97  

All directors, fiscal council members, their alternates and executive officers as a group (34 persons)

   10,257         4,029         14,286       
   Common Shares   Preferred Shares   Total 

Name

  Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
   Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
   Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
 

Brookfield Funds(2)

   535,308,795   9.24           535,308,795   8.99 

GoldenTree Funds(3)

   317,881,347   5.48           317,881,347   5.34 

Solus Funds(4)

   371,261,320   6.40    14,133,586   9.06    385,394,906   6.47 

Bratel S.à r.l.(5)

   312,827,844   5.40    1,800,000   1.15    314,627,844   5.29 

All directors, fiscal council members and their alternates, and executive officers as a group

   5,910*     24*     5,934 

 

(1)Represents 71,067,957 common

Based on the number of total shares outstanding (5,952,362,651 shares) as of April 24, 2020, which is the sum of the total number of Common Shares outstanding (5,796,447,165 Common Shares) and the total number of Preferred Shares outstanding (155,915,486 Preferred Shares) as of April 24, 2020.

(2)

Collectively refers to certain funds managed by certain Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.

(3)

GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership, serves as the investment manager or adviser to certain funds and/or accounts, or the GoldenTree Funds, with respect to the Common Shares held directly by Pharol, 112,594,247 common sharesthe GoldenTree Funds. GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC.

(4)

Solus Alternative Asset Management LP serves as the investment manager or investment subadvisor to certain funds and/or accounts, or the Solus Funds, with respect to the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares held directly by Pharol’sthe Solus Funds. Solus GP LLC is the general partner of Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, and Mr. Christopher Pucillo is the managing member of Solus GP LLC. Each of Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo may be deemed to have shared voting power and/or shared investment power with respect to the Common Shares and Preferred Shares held by each Solus Fund.

(5)

Bratel S.à r.l., a Luxembourg private limited liability company, is a wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel B.V.,of Pharol. Excludes 8,538,277 Common Shares and 134,819,390 common shares17,076,554 Preferred Shares which Pharol has the option to acquire from PTIF.PTIF in accordance with the PT Option Agreement. See “—PT Option Agreement.”

*

less than 1%

Changes in Share Ownership

On August 21, 2013, TmarPart issued 252,729,128 common shares to its shareholdersChanges in exchange for an aggregate amount of R$100 million in cash and preferred shares of our company. In connection with this transaction, Bratel Brasil contributed 300,236 of our preferred shares to TmarPart, AG Telecom contributed 481,492 of our preferred shares to TmarPart, LF Tel contributed 481,492 of our preferred shares to TmarPart, BNDESPar contributed 324,652 of our preferred shares to TmarPart, and PREVI contributed 241,121 of our preferred shares to TmarPart.GoldenTree Shareholding Interest

In May 2014, we completedAugust 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the Oi capital increaseinvestment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 201,823,190 Common Shares as of July 27, 2018, which was equivalent to 9.39% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. Of these, the GoldenTree Funds acquired 187,339,290 Common Shares through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase. In addition, the GoldenTree Funds received 2,645,333 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which we issued:they had the right to exercise to acquire 13,226,665 Common Shares.

121,674,063In November 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of our258,592,500 Common Shares as of November 28, 2018, which was equivalent to 11.4% of Oi’s outstanding common sharesstock.

In January 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and 280,483,641Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of our593,920,753 Common Shares as of January 16, 2018, which was equivalent to 15.4% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2019, the GoldenTree Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In April 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 865,512,751 Common Shares as of April 9, 2019, which was equivalent to 14.7% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In August 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 850,609,751 Common Shares as of August 19, 2019, which was equivalent to 12.8% of Oi’s outstanding common stock

In September 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 739,956,951 Common Shares as of September 17, 2019, which was equivalent to 12.8% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 567,482,776 Common Shares as of January 24, 2020, which was equivalent to 9.79% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In March 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 398,881,176 Common Shares as of March 13, 2020, which was equivalent to 6.88% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In April 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 317,881,347 Common Shares as of April 23, 2020, which was equivalent to 5.48% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

Changes in Solus Shareholding Interest

In February 2019, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager to the Solus Funds with respect to the Preferred Shares held by the Solus Funds, Solus GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, and Mr. Christopher Pucillo, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to Solus GP LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 201,230,955 Common Shares, which was equivalent to 8.88% of Oi’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2018, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares, which was equivalent to 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred shares for an aggregatestock as of R$8,250 million;December 31, 2018.

In January 2019, the Solus Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and

pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

104,580,393In February 2020, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of our371,261,320 Common Shares which was equivalent to 6.40% of Oi’s outstanding common sharesstock as of December 31, 2019, and 172,025,27314,133,586 Preferred Shares, which was equivalent to 8.96% of ourOi’s outstanding preferred sharesstock as of December 31, 2019.

Changes in Brookfield Shareholding Interest

In September 2018, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and certain funds managed by it, or the Brookfield Funds, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 123,396,285 Common Shares as of August 16, 2018, which was equivalent to Pharol5.74% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. Of these, certain of the Brookfield Funds acquired 106,054,035 Common Shares through their participation in exchange for the contribution by PharolCapitalization of Credits Capital Increase and 17,342,250 Common Shares through open market purchases. In addition, the Brookfield Funds received 1,515,232 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to usexercise to acquire 7,576,160 Common ADSs.

In January 2019, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and the Brookfield Funds jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 343,410,230 Common Shares as of January 11, 2019, which was equivalent to 9.0% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, all of which were held in the outstanding sharesform of PT Portugal.

As a result of68,682,046 ADSs, which included Common Shares that the Oi capital increase:

Pharol acquired direct ownership of 32.8% of our outstanding share capital, including 37.7% of our outstanding voting share capital,Brookfield Funds had the right to acquire through their participation in additionthe preemptive rights offering and pursuant to the indirect interests in our company that it owned prior to the Oi capital increase;

Caravelas Fundo de Investimentos em Ações, an investment vehicle managed through Banco BTG Pactual S.A., or Caravelas, acquired 6.3% of our outstanding share capital, including 6.2% of our outstanding voting share capital; and

TmarPart’s direct and indirect proportional share ownership of Oi was reduced to 4.4% of our outstanding share capital, including 12.6% of our outstanding voting share capital.

Rio Forte Defaults and PT Exchange

Prior to the Oi capital increase, Pharol’s then wholly-owned subsidies PTIF and PT Portugal subscribed to an aggregate of €897 million principal amount of commercial paper of Rio Forte that matured in July 2014. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal as part of the Oi capital increase, we became the creditor under this commercial paper.

On July 15 and 17, 2014, Rio Forte defaulted on the commercial paper held by PTIF and PT Portugal. On September 8, 2014, we, TmarPart, Pharol and our subsidiaries PT Portugal and PTIF, entered into the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement. On the same date, we, Pharol and TmarPart executed a terms of commitment agreement, which we refer to as the Terms of Commitment Agreement. For more information regarding the PT Option Agreement and the Terms of Commitment Agreement, see “—PT Option Agreement” and “—Terms of Commitment Agreement.”

On March 24, 2015, PT Portugal assigned its rightstheir commitments under the PT Exchange AgreementCommitment Agreement.

In January 2019, the Brookfield Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and the PT Option Agreementpursuant to PTIF. On March 27, 2015, PT Portugal assigned all of its rights and obligationstheir commitments under the Rio Forte commercial paper that itCommitment Agreement.

Changes in Bratel Shareholding Interest

As of January 1, 2017, Bratel B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol, owned to PTIF.

Under the PT Exchange Agreement, on March 30, 2015, we transferred the defaulted Rio Forte commercial paper to Pharol and Pharol delivered to us an aggregate of 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares, representing 16.9% of our outstanding share capital, including 17.1% of our outstanding voting capital prior to giving effect to the PT Exchange. Under Brazilian law, these shares are deemed to be held in treasury.

Corporate Ownership Simplification183,662,204 Common Shares.

On September 1, 2015, TmarPart merged with15, 2017 and into our company. Immediately prior to this merger:

AG Telecom merged with and into PASA;

LF Tel merged with and into EDSP;

PASA and EDSP merged with and intoSeptember 29, 2017, Oi received letters from Bratel Brasil;

Valverde merged with and into TmarPart;

Venus RJ Participações S.A., Sayed RJ Participações S.A. and PTB2 S.A. merged with and intoB.V. informing it that Bratel Brasil; and

Bratel Brasil merged with and into TmarPart.

As a result of these transactions, as of September 1, 2015, the ownership structure of our common shares and preferred shares was as set forth in the chart below. The percentages in bold and italics represent the percentage of the outstanding common shares owned by each shareholder, and the percentages not in bold and italics represent the percentage of the total outstanding share capital owned by each shareholder.

LOGO

Voluntary Share Exchange

On October 8, 2015, we completed a voluntary share exchange under which weB.V. had offered (1) the holders of our preferred shares (including preferred shares represented by the Preferred ADSs), the opportunity to convert their preferred shares into our common shares at a ratio of 0.9211 common shares for each preferred share, plus cash in lieu of any fractional share, and (2) the holders of the Preferred ADSs the opportunity to exchange their Preferred ADSs for Common ADSs at a ratio of 0.9211 Common ADSs for each Preferred ADS, plus cash in lieu of any fractional Common ADS. Holders of 314,250,655 of our preferred shares were tendered for conversion or exchange of the related ADSs. Each of Pharol and Caravelas participated in the voluntary share exchange and surrendered all of its preferred shares for conversion. As a result of the voluntary share exchange, 314,250,655 of our outstanding preferred shares were cancelled and in exchange we issued 289,456,278 of our common shares.

Decrease of Caravelas shareholding interest

In March 2016, we received a letter from BTG Pactual Asset Management S.A. DTVM, or BTG Pactual AM informing us that Caravelas had reducedtransferred its shareholding interests in our companyOi to its wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel S.à r.l.

We believe that Bratel S.à r.l. acquired 110,597,655 Common Shares through its participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase and through open market purchases prior to the settlement of the Pharol Settlement Agreement on April 3, 2019.

In accordance with the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which was confirmed by the RJ Court in a decision that became final on April 3, 2019, Oi transferred to Bratel 32,000,000 Common Shares and 1,800,000 Preferred Shares held in treasury.

Based on records that we receive from 7.52%the B3 related to approximately 3.54%current holdings of our common stock, as a resultshare capital through the B3, we believe that Bratel S.à r.l. has disposed of 13,432,015 Common Shares through open market purchases since the settlement of the partial redemption and subsequent transfer of assets to the former quotaholder of Caravelas. Therefore, the funds managed of BTG Pactual AM reduced its aggregate shareholding interests from 7.54% to less than 5% of our common shares and no longer holds a material shareholding interest in our company.Pharol Settlement Agreement on April 3, 2019.

PT Option Agreement

In May 2014, Oi completed a capital increase in which it issued, among other things 104,580,393 Common Shares and 172,025,273 of Preferred Shares to Pharol in exchange for the contribution by Pharol to Oi of all of the outstanding shares of PT Portugal. However, prior to this capital increase, Pharol’s then wholly-owned subsidiaries PTIF and PT Portugal subscribed to an aggregate of €897 million principal amount of commercial paper of Rio Forte that matured in July 2014. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal as part of the Oi capital increase, we became the creditor under this commercial paper.

On July 15 and 17, 2014, Rio Forte defaulted on the commercial paper held by PTIF and PT Portugal. On September 8, 2014, we, TmarPart, Pharol and our subsidiaries PT Portugal and PTIF, entered into the PT Exchange Agreement and a stock option agreement, or the PT Option Agreement.

On March 24, 2015, PT Portugal assigned its rights and obligations under the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement to PTIF. On March 27, 2015, PT Portugal assigned the Rio Forte commercial paper that it owned to PTIF. Under the PT Exchange Agreement, on March 30, 2015, we transferred the defaulted Rio Forte commercial paper to Pharol and Pharol delivered to us an aggregate of 47,434,872 Common Shares and 94,869,744 Preferred Shares, representing 16.9% of Oi’s outstanding share capital, including 17.1% of Oi’s outstanding voting capital prior to giving effect to the PT Exchange. Under Brazilian law, these shares are deemed to be held in treasury.

Under the PT Option Agreement, PTIF granted to Pharol an option, or the PT Option, to acquire 47,434,872 of our common sharesCommon Shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares.Preferred Shares. Pharol is entitled to exercise the PT Option in whole or in part, at any time prior to March 31, 2021. The number of shares subject to the PT Option will beis reduced on each March 31 such that:

 

100% was available until March 31, 2016;

90% of the shares originally subject to the option will bewas available between March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017;

 

72% will bewas available between March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018;

 

54% will be available between March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019;

 

36% will be available between March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020; and

 

18% will be available between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021,

in each case, less the number of shares with respect to the PT Option has been previously exercised. As of May 13, 2016,March 31, 2020, Pharol hashad not exercised the PT Option with respect to any of ourOi’s shares and, as a result, the option over 4,743,48738,896,595 Common Shares and 77,793,190 of our common shares and 9,486,974 of our preferred sharesPreferred Shares has lapsed. The exercise prices under the PT Option are be R$20.104 per common shareCommon Share and R$18.529 per preferred share,Preferred Share, in each case as adjusted by the CDI rateplus 1.5% per annum, calculatedpro rata temporis, from March 31, 2015 to the date of the effective payment of the exercise price.

We areOi is not required to maintain the shares subject to the PT Option in treasury. In the event that, at the time of exercise of the PT Option, PTIF and/or any of ourOi’s other subsidiaries do not hold, in treasury, the number of shares with respect to which Pharol exercises the PT Option, the PT Option may be financially settled through payment by

PTIF of the amount corresponding to the difference between the market price of the shares and the exercise price corresponding to these shares.

We may terminate the PT Option if (1) theby-laws of Pharol are amended to remove or amend the provision of thoseby-laws that limits the voting right to 10% of all votes corresponding to the capital stock of Pharol, except if this removal or amendment is required by law or by order of a competent governmental authority; (2) Pharol directly or indirectly engages in activities that compete with the activities of our companyOi or ourOi’s subsidiaries in the countries in which we or they operate; or (3) Pharol violates certain obligations under the PT Option Agreement.

Prior to the earlier of the expiration or full exercise of the PT Option, Pharol may not purchase shares of our company,Oi, directly or indirectly, in any manner other than by exercising the PT Option. If the PT Option is exercised, Pharol will undertake its best efforts to integrate the shareholder bases of Pharol and Oi in the shortest time possible.

Pharol may not directly or indirectly transfer or assign the PT Option, in whole or in part, nor grant any rights under the PT Option, including any security interest in the PT Option or the shares underlying the PT Option, without the consent of our company.Oi. If Pharol issues, directly or indirectly, any derivative instrument that is backed by or references ourOi’s shares, it shall immediately use all proceeds derived directly or indirectly from such derivative instrument to acquire shares pursuant to the exercise of the PT Option.

On March 31, 2015, we, Pharol and PTIF entered into an amendment to the PT Option Agreement. Under this amendment, (1) Pharol will be permitted to assign the PT Option to a third party provided that such assignment involves at least one-quarter of our shares subject to the PT Option, and (2) Pharol has granted our company a right of first refusal exercisable prior to any such assignment. This amendment does not affect the agreement of Pharol not to grant any rights under the PT Option, including any security interest in the PT Option or the shares underlying the PT Option, without the consent of our company, or the requirement that Pharol use all proceeds derived directly or indirectly from the issuance of any derivative instrument that is backed by or references our shares to acquire shares pursuant to the exercise of the PT Option.

The effectiveness of the amendment to the PT Option Agreement is subject to (1) the authorization of the amended terms by the CVM, and (2) the approval of the amendment to the PT Option Agreement by a general meeting of our shareholders at which both our common and preferred shareholders will be entitled to vote. The CVM has not authorized the amended terms; however, in December 2015, the board of directors of the CVM declined to authorize the amended terms.

Terms of Commitment Agreement

On March 31, 2015, we and Pharol entered into an amendment to the Terms of Commitment Agreement. The Terms of Commitment Agreement, as amended, will remain in effect until the integration of the shareholder bases of Oi and Pharol pursuant to a legally permissible structure, which we refer to as the Integration Transaction, has been fully completed, including in respect of any shares of our company that may be acquired by Pharol during the term of the PT Option.

Under the Terms of Commitment Agreement, we and Pharol each agreed:

to use our respective best efforts and to take all reasonable measures to also implement the listing of our shares (or securities backed by our shares or our successor in case of a corporate reorganization) on the regulated market of Euronext Lisbon concurrently with the migration of our company to theNovo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA, which we refer to as the migration, provided that in the event that it is not possible for any reason beyond the control of the parties for these listings to occur prior to or concurrently with the approval of the migration, they will use their best efforts and to take all reasonable measures to implement these listings as soon as possible following the migration.

to perform all acts, provide any required information, prepare all necessary documentation and to present and duly file all necessary filings before all appropriate governmental bodies and authorities so as to

implement the listing on the regulated market of Euronext Lisbon and Integration Transaction as soon as possible.

to undertake to perform all necessary acts to implement the Integration Transaction relating to all shares of our company held by Pharol as of March 31, 2015 or that Pharol shall come to hold for so long as the Terms of Commitment Agreement is in force, including, but not limited to:

preparing and filing any prospectuses, including for admission to trading, registration statements or other documents with the CVM, the CMVM, Euronext Lisbon and the SEC by Pharol and/or our company (or our successor in case of a corporate reorganization), as the case may be, including the preparation of audited and unaudited financial statements required by the rules of such government authorities, and

engaging independent auditors, independent financial institutions or other experts to prepare financial statements, valuation reports and/or other necessary reports or documents and to use best efforts to cause such experts to consent to the inclusion their reports or other documents in the prospectuses, registration statements or other documents to be filed with CVM, CMVM, Euronext Lisbon and the SEC.

In addition, under the Terms of Commitment Agreement we agreed to attend any general meetings of the shareholders of Pharol convened for the purposes of deliberating on the acts and authorizations required for the Integration Transaction, whether through a reduction of the share capital of Pharol, pursuant to the alternative structure under analysis described in the Information Statement issued by Pharol, dated August 13, 2014, or through another legally permissible alternative structure, and to vote in favor of approval of the approval of these acts and authorizations, to the extent our legitimate interests are preserved.

The obligations assumed by our company and Pharol described above apply equally in the event the Integration Transaction continues in respect of any of our shares that Pharol may receive upon exercise of the PT Option.

Related Party Transactions

The following summarizes the material transactions that we have engaged in with ourOi’s principal shareholders and their affiliates since January 1, 2015.2019.

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, each of ourOi’s directors their alternates and ourOi’s executive officers cannot vote on any matter in which they have a conflict of interest and such transactions can only be approved on reasonable and fair terms and conditions that are no more favorable than the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties. However, if one of our directors is absent from a meeting of our board of directors, that director’s alternate may vote even if that director has a conflict of interest, unless the alternate director shares that conflict of interest or has another conflict of interest.

PT Exchange and Related AgreementsTransactions with Hispamar

On March 30, 2015,We own 19% of the capital stock of Hispamar. We lease transponders on the Amazonas 3 satellite from Hispamar, which we use to provide voice and data services. During 2019, our total consolidated expenses under the PT Exchange Agreement, we transferred the defaulted Rio Forte commercial paperlease agreements amounted to Pharol and Pharol delivered to us an aggregateR$203 million. As of 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares, representing 16.9% of our outstanding share capital, including 17.1% of our outstanding voting capital prior to giving effect to the PT Exchange.

Under the PT Option Agreement, PTIF has granted to Pharol an option to acquire 47,434,872 of our common shares and 94,869,744 of our preferred shares at exercise prices of R$20.104 per common share and R$18.529 per preferred share, in each case as adjusted by the CDI rateplus 1.5% per annum, calculatedpro rata temporis, from MarchDecember 31, 2015 to the date of the effective payment of the exercise price. For more information regarding the PT Option Agreement, see “—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement.”

Under the Terms of Commitment Agreement, we have made numerous commitments relating to the listing of our shares on the regulated market of Euronext Lisbon and the implementation of the Integration Transaction. For more information regarding the Terms of Commitment Agreement, see “—Major Shareholders—Terms of Commitment Agreement.”

Corporate Ownership Simplification

On September 1, 2015, TmarPart merged with and into our company. In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, the net assets of TmarPart, in the amount of R$122.4 million were merged into the shareholders’ equity of Oi and as a result of the merger, TmarPart ceased to exist. The merger of TmarPart with and into Oi also resulted in the transfer to the shareholders’ equity of Oi of goodwill derived from the acquisition of equity interest recorded by Bratel Brasil, AG Telecom, LF Tel, and TmarPart, in accordance with applicable Brazilian law. In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, shareholders of TmarPart received the same number of shares of Oi as were held by TmarPart immediately prior to the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi in proportion to their holdings in TmarPart. No withdrawal rights for the holders of shares of Oi were available in connection with the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi.

Voluntary Share Exchange

On October 8, 2015, we completed a voluntary share exchange under which2019, we had offered (1) the holdersaccounts payable to Hispamar of our preferred shares (including preferred shares represented by the Preferred ADSs), the opportunity to convert their preferred shares into our common shares at a ratio of 0.9211 common shares for each preferred share, plus cash in lieu of any fractional share, and (2) the holders of the Preferred ADSs the opportunity to exchange their Preferred ADSs for Common ADSs at a ratio of 0.9211 Common ADSs for each Preferred ADS, plus cash in lieu of any fractional Common ADS. Holders of 314,250,655 of our outstanding preferred shares tendered their shares for conversion or exchange of the related ADSs. As a result of the voluntary share exchange, 314,250,655 of our outstanding preferred shares were cancelled and in exchange we issued 289,456,278 of our common shares. Pharol and Caravelas participated in the voluntary share exchange: Pharol surrendered 77,155,529 preferred shares for conversion and received 71,067,957 common shares, and Caravelas surrendered 35,917,151 preferred shares for conversion and received 33,083,287 common shares.R$50 million.

BNDES Facilities

For a description of our credit facilities with BNDES, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Indebtedness and Financing Strategy—Long-Term Indebtedness.” For other information about these agreements, see note 17 to our consolidated financial statements.

Transactions with AIX

Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., in which we own 50% of the outstanding share capital, renders services to us relating to the rental of ducts for transmission of traffic originated outside our local network in Region I of Brazil. In 2015,our service areas. During 2019, our total consolidated expenses for services rendered by AIX amounted to R$21 million.

Transactions with Contax

On November 30, 2004, Telemar and TNL PCS entered into a call center services agreement with Contax S.A., or Contax, a call center business owned principally by some of the controlling shareholders of TmarPart, under which Contax renders call center services to TNL PCS on a fully outsourced basis. Telemar and TNL PCS agreed to pay an estimated amount of R$550 million per year, subject to adjustment based on services actually rendered at the request of Telemar and TNL PCS. As a result of the merger of TNL PCS with and into Oi Mobile in February 2014, Oi Mobile assumed all of TNL PCS’s rights and obligations under this agreement. As a result of the corporate ownership simplification, as of September 1, 2015 Contax is no longer a related party of our company. Contax currently provides a variety of services to Telemar and Oi Mobile, including customer services for our fixed-line business, outbound telemarketing to attract additional mobile customers, customer support for pre-paid and post-paid mobile telephone users, technical support for ADSL subscribers and debt collection services. During the period

ended September 1, 2015 (the period of 2015 during which Contax was a related party), our total consolidated expenses for services rendered by Contax amounted to R$1,004 million.

Transactions with Hispamar

We own 19% of the capital stock of Hispamar. We lease transponders on the Amazonas 3 satellite from Hispamar, which we use to provide voice and data services. In 2015, our total consolidated expenses under the lease agreements amounted to R$207 million.

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

Legal Proceedings

General

We are a party to certain legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including civil, administrative, tax, social security, labor, government and arbitration proceedings. We classify our risk of loss in legal proceedings as “remote,” “possible” or “probable,” and we only record provisions for reasonably estimable probable losses, as determined by our management.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the total estimated amount in controversy for those proceedings in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled approximately R$30,50136,134 million, and we had established provisions of R$4,4355,252 million relating to these proceedings. Our provisions for legal contingencies are subject to monthly monetary adjustments. For a detailed description of our provisions for contingencies, see note 2124 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

In certain instances, we are required to make judicial deposits or post financial guarantees with the applicable judicial bodies. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had made judicial deposits in the aggregate amount of R$14,3778,166 million, and obtained financial guarantees from third parties in the aggregate amount of R$14,01311,910 million. During 2015,2019, we paid fees in the aggregate amount of R$246251 million to the financial institutions from which we had obtained these guarantees, and as of December 31, 2015,2019, we had pledged 1,811,755 of our preferred shares,Preferred Shares, representing 1.15% of our outstanding share capital, as security for one of these financial guarantees.

Tax Proceedings Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with tax proceedings against us in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled R$24,54029,467 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$4921,051 million relating to these proceedings. In accordance with Brazilian law, our tax contingencies are not subject to the RJ Plan.

The Brazilian corporate tax system is complex, and as of the date of this annual report, we are currently involved in tax proceedings regarding, and have filed claims to avoid payment of, certain taxes that we believe are unconstitutional. These tax contingencies, which relate primarily to value-added tax, service tax and taxes on revenue, are described in detail in note 2124 to our audited consolidated financial statements.statements included in this annual report. We record provisions for probable losses in connection with these claims based on an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. We currentlyAs of the date of this annual report, we do not believe that the proceedings that we consider as probable losses, if decided against us, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. It is possible, however, that our future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions and the effectiveness of our strategies with respect to these proceedings.

Value-Added State Taxes (ICMS)

Under the regulations governing the ICMS, in effect in all Brazilian states, telecommunications companies must pay ICMS on every transaction involving the sale of telecommunications services they provide. We may record

ICMS credits for each of our purchases of operational assets. The ICMS regulations allow us to apply the credits we have recorded for the purchase of operational assets to reduce the ICMS amounts we must pay when we sell our services.

We have received various tax assessments challenging the amount of tax credits that we recorded to offset the ICMS amounts we owed. Most of the tax assessments are based on two main issues: (1) whether ICMS is due on those services subject to the Local Service Tax (Imposto Sobre Serviços de Qualquer Natureza), or ISS; and (2) whether some of the assets we have purchased are related to the telecommunications services provided, and, therefore, eligible for an ICMS tax credit. A small part of the assessments that are considered to have a probable risk of loss are related to: (1) whether certain revenues are subject to ICMS tax or ISS tax; (2) offset and usage of tax credits on the purchase of goods and other materials, including those necessary to maintain the network; and (3) assessments related tonon-compliance with certain ancillary(non-monetary) obligations.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$10,14413,470 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of that date,December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$308746 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Local Service Tax (ISS)

We have received various tax assessments claiming that we owe ISS taxes on supplementary services. We have challenged these assessments on the basis that ISS taxes should not be applied to supplementary services (such as, among others things, equipment leasing and technical and administrative services) provided by telecommunications service providers, because these services do not clearly fit into the definition of “telecommunications services.”

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$2,9082,840 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of that date,December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$7169 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

FUST and FUNTTEL

The FUST is a fund that was established to promote the expansion of telecommunications services tonon-commercially viable users. The FUNTTEL was established to finance telecommunications technology research. We are required to make contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL. Due to a change by ANATEL in the basis for calculation of our contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL, we made provisions for additional contributions to the FUST and TNL made provisions for additional contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL. With respect to the calculation of the contribution to the FUST, the Brazilian Association of Fixed-Line Companies(Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Telefonia Fixa) of which we are members, filed a lawsuit to request a review of the applicable legislation.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$3,1615,134 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$5 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Contributions to the INSS

Pursuant to Brazilian social security legislation, companies must pay contributions to the National Social Security Institute (Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social), or INSS, based on their payroll. In the case of outsourced services, the contracting parties must, in certain circumstances, withhold the social contribution due from the third-party service providers and pay the retained amounts to the INSS. In other cases, the parties are jointly and severally liable for contributions to the INSS. Assessments have been filed against us primarily relating to claims regarding joint and several liability and claims regarding the percentage to be used to calculate workers’ compensation benefits and other amounts subject to social security tax.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$1,029650 million of these assessments. As of that date,December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions of R$2924 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

PIS and COFINS

In 2006, the Brazilian federal tax authorities filed a claim in the amount of R$1,026 million related to the basis for the calculation of PIS/COFINS. In 2007, TNL obtained a partially favorable decision in a lower court that reduced the amount of this claim to R$585 million. Both TNL and the Brazilian federal tax authorities filed appeals, with respect to which decisions are pending. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$3,2902,136 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of this claim.

ILL

TNL used credits from the Tax on Net Profit(Imposto sobre Lucro Líquido), or ILL, to offset certain other taxes based on decisions rendered by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in cases brought by other taxpayers that have held this tax unconstitutional. No final administrative or judicial ruling has been rendered setting forth the criteria by which to calculate the amounts permitted to be offset.these assessments. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$723 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemdeemed the risk of loss as probable.

Other Tax Claims

There are various federal taxes that have been assessed against us, largely relating to (1) assessments of taxes against our company that we do not believe are due and which we are contesting, and (2) our use of tax credits to offset certain federal taxes, which the federal tax authorities are contesting.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$3,5154,186 million of these assessments. As of that date,December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$77184 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with civil claims against us including ANATEL proceedings, in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible, totaled R$4,3313,818 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$3,0932,150 million relating to these proceedings.

Administrative Proceedings

Almost every week,On an almost weekly basis, we receive notificationsinquiries from ANATEL requestingrequiring information aboutfrom us on our compliance with the various servicesservice obligations imposed on our companyus by virtue of our concession agreements. WhenIf we are not ableunable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the RGQ and the PGMU.

At the time that ANATEL notifies us it believes that we have failed to comply with these requests or with our concession obligations, ANATEL may initiate administrative proceedings to impose sanctionswe evaluate the claim and, based on us. We have received various notifications, mainly for not meeting certain goals or obligations set out inour assessment of the General Plan on Universal Service Goals or the General Plan on Quality Goals, such as responding to complaintsprobability of loss relating to billing errors, requests for service repairs onthat claim, may establish a timely basis and requests from locations with collective or individual access.provision. We vigorously contest a substantial number of the assessments made against us.

As of December 31, 2015, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$144 million of these claims and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these claims. As of that date,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$1,149570 million including fines which we are contesting through judicial proceedings, for those claims inwith respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable. In the event that we are unsuccessful in obtaining final approval of the inclusion of the R$5 billion of fines and claims we have proposed to be included in the TAC program, we could be required to constitute an additional provision of the portion of these fines and claims for which we have not previously established a provision.

As a condition to ANATEL’s approval of the Portugal Telecom Alliance, ANATEL required that Telemar and Oi pay all pending administrative fines, amounting to approximately R$218 million, regardless of the procedural posture of the proceedings which Telemar and Oi had instituted to contest these fines. Telemar and Oi deemed the risk of loss as possible and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these claims. Telemar and Oi sought and have been granted injunctive relief which has permitted them to make judicial deposits of these amounts while preserving its rights to contest these fines. ANATEL has appealed these injunctions, which appeals remain pending.

Brazilian Antitrust Proceedings

We are subject to administrative proceedings and preliminary investigations conducted by the Brazilian antitrust authorities with respect to potential violations of the Brazilian antitrust law. Such investigations may result in penalties, including fines. To date,During 2019, no fines or penalties have beenwere levied against us. We deemed the risk of loss as possible that we will be fined in one or more of such proceedings and have not recorded any provisions for those claims.

Financial Interest Agreement (CRTAgreements (PEX and PCT)

Prior to the privatization of Telebrás, users of fixed-line telephony services in Brazil were required to purchase the right to use fixed telephone lines. These purchases could be made through two types of financial interest agreements: (1) Plan of Expansion (Plano de Expansão), or PEX, contracts; and (2) Community Telephone Program)Program (Planta Comunitária de Telefonia

As successor), or PCT, contracts. Under PEX contracts, customers who purchased a telephone line acquired the right subscribe for a number of a telephone company’s shares. Under the PCT program, users who purchased a telephone line acquired a participation in an association formed by a local community that subcontracted the construction or expansion of necessary infrastructure, which was then sold to CRT, which we acquiredthe telephone company, in July 2000, we are subject to various civil claims. The claims, filed in 1998 and 1999, allege: (1) error in the sale of CRT’s share capital; (2) the illegality of bidding procedure No. 04/98; (3) errors in the calculationexchange for shares of the company. The number of shares offered; (4) procedural nonconformities into be issued to each user was determined based on a formula that divided the shareholders’ meeting that approvedcontract value by the sale of shares of CRT; and (5) errors in the valuationbook value of the shares of CRT.shares.

We are also a defendant in several claims filed by users of telephone lines in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Prior to our acquisition of control of CRT in July 2000, CRT entered into financial interest agreementsPEX contracts with its fixed-line subscribers. Under these financial interest agreements, customers subscribing to CRT’s fixed-line service had the right to subscribe to a number of CRT shares. The number of shares to be issued to such subscribers was determined based on a formula that divided the cost of the fixed-line subscription by the book value of CRT’s shares.

Beginning in June 1997, certain of CRT’s fixed-line subscribers began to file suits in which they claimed that the calculation used by CRT to arrive at the number of shares to be issued pursuant to the financial interest agreements was incorrect and resulted in the claimants receiving too few shares.

In addition, as successor to Telecomunicações do Mato Grosso do Sul S.A. – Telems, Telecomunicações de Goiás S.A. – Telegoiás and Telecomunicações do Mato Grosso S.A. – Telemat, which were operatingvarious companies that Brasil Telecom Holdingwe acquired in the privatization of Telebrás and which were subsequently merged into our company, we are subject to various civil claims filed by PCT participants who also disagree with the value of their shares in connection with telephone programs (Community Telephone Programs) established inthose companies and who seek to recover the States of Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás and Mato Grosso.amounts they invested.

In 2009, two court decisions significantly changed the assumptions underlying our estimate of the potential losses relating to these suits.

On In March 30, 2009, the Superior Court of Justice ruled that for suits that had yet to be adjudicated, the number of shares to be issued must be calculated using CRT’s balance sheet at the end of the month in which the shares were issued. However, for those lawsuits that have already been adjudicated, the number of shares to be issued must be calculated according to the most recent judicial decision, which, in most of the cases, used the balance sheet at the end of the year prior to the date on which the shares were issued.

On May 28, 2009, a member of the Brazilian Supreme Court published a decision ruling that the financial interest agreements are not subject to athe twenty-year statute of limitations which resulted in a change inprescribed by the Brazilian Civil Code, as opposed to the three-year statute of limitations prescribed by the Brazilian Corporate Law. This decision increased the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in a greater number of these pending cases than previously anticipated. Also in March 2009, the Superior Court of Justice ruled that the number of shares to probable.be issued must be calculated using the book value of the shares listed on company’s balance sheet at the end of the first month in which the shares were issued.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$1,112398 million for those claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Customer Service Centers

We are a defendant in 6647 civil class actions filed by the Attorney General of the National Treasury jointly with certain consumer agencies demanding there-opening of customer service centers. The lower courts have rendered decisions in all of these proceedings, some of which have been unfavorable to us. AllAs of the date of this annual report, all of these proceedings are currently under appeal. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$1216.6 million for those claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Customer Service

We are a defendant in a civil class action lawsuit filed by the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério Público Federal)seekingOfficeseeking recovery for alleged collective moral damages caused by TNL’s allegednon-compliance with the Customer Service (Serviço de Atendimento ao ConsumidorSAC)regulations established by the Ministry of Justice (Ministério da Justiça). TNL presented its defense and asked for a change of venue to federal court in Rio de Janeiro, where we are headquartered. Other defendants have been named and await service of process. The amount involved in this action is R$300 million. As a result of thea corporate reorganization in 2012, we have succeeded to TNL’s position as a defendant in this action. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to these lawsuits and had not made any provisions with respect to this action since it was awaiting the court’s initial decision.

Special Civil Court Proceedings

We are party to proceedings in special civil courts relating to customer claims in connection with our basic subscription services. The value of any individual claim does not exceed 40 minimum wages. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$362119 million for these claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Other Claims

We are defendants in various claims involving contract termination, indemnification of former suppliers and contractors, review of contractual conditions due to economic stabilization plans and breach of contract. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$4711,063 million in respect of these claims.

Labor Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations

We are a party to a large number of labor claims arising out of the ordinary course of our businesses. We do not believe any of these claims, individually or in the aggregate would have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if such claims are decided against us. These proceedings generally involve claims for: (1) risk premium payments sought by employees working in dangerous conditions; (2) wage parity claims seeking equal pay among employees who do the same kind of work, within a given period of time, and have the same productivity and technical performance; (3) indemnification payments for, among other things, work accidents, occupational injuries, employment stability, child care allowances and achievement of productivity standards set forth in our collective bargaining agreements; (4) overtime wages; and (5) joint liability allegations by employees of third-party service providers.

As of December 31, 2015,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with labor claims against us in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled R$1,6292,849 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$8492,051 million relating to these proceedings.

Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in AfricatelFinancial Restructuring

Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

On September 16, 2014, Africatel GmbH receivedJune 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a letter from Samba Luxcojoint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 20, 2017, the RJ Plan was approved by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at a GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

During 2018, the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan was concluded.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and remain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which Samba Luxco claimed that Oi’s acquisition of PT Portugal was deemed a change of control of Pharolwe believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the Africatel shareholders’ agreement,RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that this change of control entitled Samba Luxco to exercise a put right under the Africatel shareholders’ agreementheld credits and had voting rights at the fair markettime of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity valuesecurities of Samba Luxco’s Africatel shares. In the letter, Samba

Luxco purportedRJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to exercise the alleged put right and thereby require Africatel GmbH to acquire its shares in Africatel.vote.

On November 12, 2014,March 6, 2020, the InternationalRJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Administrator must take place within 60 days from the date of Arbitrationsubmission of the International Chamberproposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of Commerce notified Africatel GmbHour mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the specific terms of the proposed amendment that Samba Luxco had commenced arbitral proceedings against Africatel GmbHwill be presented to enforce its purported put right or, in the alternative, certain ancillary rights and claims. Africatel GmbH presented its answer to Samba Luxco’s request for arbitration on December 15, 2014. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on March 12, 2015 and held a first management conference in London on May 8, 2015.RJ Court.

On July 22, 2015, Samba Luxco submitted its Statement of Claim, and on October 9, 2015, Pharol and Africatel GmbH submitted their Statement of Defence. On January 25, 2016, Samba Luxco submitted its Reply and, on March 14, 2016, Pharol and Africatel GmbH submitted their Rejoinder.ANATEL Proceedings

The proceedings have been bifurcated, with the merits hearing currently scheduled to take place during November 2016. Dates for a quantum hearing (if necessary) have been reserved in March 2017.

Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in Unitel

On October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other shareholders of Unitel asAs a result of the violationcommencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, all outstandingnon-tax claims of ANATEL against the RJ Debtors as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the contingencies for claims of ANATEL recognized by those shareholdersthe RJ Court was R$9,334 million.

Under the RJ Plan, claims of ANATEL were classified as Class III claims. Under the RJ Plan, liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and in calculating the recovery of ANATEL under these claims the amounts of all accrued interest included in these claims was reduced by 50% and the amounts of all late charges included in these claims was reduced by 25%. The remaining amount of these claims will be settled in 240 monthly installments, beginning on June 30, 2018, in the amount of 0.160% of the outstanding claims for the first 60 monthly installments, 0.330% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.500% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.660% of the outstanding claims for the next 59 monthly installments, and the remainder at maturity on June 30, 2038. Beginning on July 31, 2018, the amounts of each monthly installment have been be adjusted by the SELIC variation. Payments of monthly installments will be made through the application of judicial deposits related to these claims until the balance of these judicial deposits has been exhausted and thereafter will be payable in cash inreais.

Under the RJ Plan,non-liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and ANATEL is entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to these claims.

In the event that a legal rule is adopted in Brazil that regulates an alternative manner for the settlement of the claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016, the RJ Debtors may adopt the new regime, observing the terms and conditions set forth in Oi’sby-laws.

Notwithstanding the above, ANATEL has challenged the treatment of its outstanding claims for fines, interest and penalties in the RJ Proceedings. Concurrently with our negotiations with our financial creditors as part of our RJ Proceedings, we engaged in negotiation and litigation with ANATEL, our largest creditor, with respect to the treatment of outstanding claims for fines, interest and penalties in the RJ Proceedings. On November 24, 2016, a hearing was held with the goal of consensually resolving ANATEL’s claims against the RJ Debtors’ as part of a varietymediation procedure initiated under RJ Proceedings. However, ANATEL filed an appeal against the decision which ordered the mediation, which is pending judgement.

The revised list of provisionscreditors submitted to the RJ Court by the Judicial Administrator, or the Second List of Creditors, recognized claims of ANATEL in the aggregate amount of approximately R$11.1 billion. On June 9, 2017 ANATEL filed a challenge to the Second List of Creditors, objecting the inclusion of its claim. We disagree with the amount and are challenging some of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, includingnoncompliance events alleged by ANATEL, and are also challenging the provisions entitling PT Ventures to nominate the majorityfairness of the memberspenalties, emphasizing the unreasonableness of the boardamount of directorsthe imposed fines in light of Unitelthe alleged noncompliance events.

The inclusion of the claims of ANATEL in the RJ Debtor’s judicial reorganization plan does not require the consent of ANATEL, but instead depends on the recognition of the applicability of the RJ Proceedings to these claims.

On August 23, 2016, ANATEL filed an appeal against the decision of the RJ Court which granted the processing of the RJ Proceedings, stating that the RJ Proceedings did not apply to ANATEL’s claims. On August 29, 2017, the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice granted ANATEL’s appeal to maintain the name of the RJ Debtors in the databases of the credit protection agencies, but held that thepre-petition claims of ANATEL were not tax claims and, its chief executive officer. Vidatel presented its answertherefore, were subject to PT Ventures’ request for arbitrationthe RJ Proceedings. On October 20, 2017, ANATEL filed a special and an extraordinary appeals against the decision of the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice. Judgments on January 8, 2016. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on April 14, 2016these appeals by the Superior Court of Justice and the proceedingsSupreme Court of Brazil are ongoing.

On March 14, 2016, the other shareholders of Unitel initiated an arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures, claiming that Pharol’s sale of a minority interest in Africatel to our company did not comply with the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. PT Ventures disputes this interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, and we believe that the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement apply only to a transfer of Unitel shares by PT Ventures itself. PT Ventures is seeking to consolidate this arbitration proceeding with the separate arbitration proceeding brought by PT Ventures against the other shareholders of Unitel. We intend to continue to vigorously defend these proceedings.pending.

Non-Provisioned Contingencies

We are defendants in various proceedings with no legal precedent involving network expansion plans, compensation for moral and material damages, collections and bidding proceedings, intellectual property and supplementary pension plan, among others, for which we deem the risk of loss as possible and have not recorded any provisions. As of December 31, 2015,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to R$26,066 billion30,882 million of these proceedings. This amount is based on total value of the damages being sought by the plaintiffs.plaintiffs; however, the value of some of these claims, cannot be estimated at this time. Typically, we believe the value of individual claims to be beyond the merits of the case in question.

Dividends and Dividend Policy

Payment of DividendsDividend Policy

OurOi’s dividend distribution policy has historically included the distribution of periodic dividends, based on the annual balance sheetsfinancial statements approved by ourOi’s board of directors. The payment of dividends is currently subject only to the provisions ofdirectors, in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law and our as set forth in Oi’sby-laws, which provide that, the dividends will be paid annually in thegeneral, a minimum amount of 25% of Oi’s consolidated net income for each fiscal year, as calculated and adjusted net income. Our distribution policy mayfor amounts allocated to legal and other applicable reserves in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, must be implemented through the distribution of dividends, payment of interest on capital, share grants or redemption, capital reduction or other forms that enable the distribution of fundsdistributed to shareholders. We refer to this amount as the mandatory distributable amount. Oi may pay the mandatory distributable amount as dividends, interest attributable to shareholders’ equity (which is similar to a dividend but is deductible in calculating corporate income tax and social contribution on net profits, subject to certain limitations imposed by law as described in “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Interest on Shareholders’ Equity”). Payment of intermediate or interim dividends willis also be permitted, subject to market conditions, ourOi’s then-prevailing financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by ourOi’s board of directors.

Oi may set off any payment of interim dividends against the amount of the mandatory distributable amount to be paid in the year in which the interim dividends are paid.

Notwithstanding the above, under Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan, Oi and the other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until February 5, 2024. After February 5, 2024, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if the ratio of Oi’s consolidated net debt (defined as Financial Credits, minus Cash Balance (in each case as defined in the RJ Plan)) to EBITDA (as defined in the RJ Plan) for the fiscal year ended immediately prior to any such declaration or payment is less than or equal to 2 to 1.

The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described above are subject to the following exceptions:

dividends, return on capital or other distributions made between the RJ Debtors;

payments by Oi and the other RJ Debtors to dissenting shareholders, according to applicable law, carried out after February5, 2018; and

any payment of dividends made in accordance with the RJ Plan.

There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits.

Pursuant to Section 10.2.1 of the RJ Plan, if at any time any two of Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch rate Oi as investment grade and no default occurs, the restrictions on distributions imposed by Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan will be suspended. However, if one of these rating agencies, or both of them, subsequently cancels or downgrades Oi’s rating, then the suspended restrictions will be reinstated.

When we declareOi declares dividends, we areOi is generally required to pay them within 60 days of declaring them, unless the shareholders’ resolution establishes another payment date. In any event, if we declareOi declares dividends, weOi must pay them by the end of the fiscal year for which they are declared. Under Article 9 of Law No. 9,249/95 and our Oi’sby-laws, we Oi also may pay interest attributable to shareholders’ equity as an alternative form of dividends upon approval of ourOi’s board of directors. For a more detailed description of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, see “—Payment of Dividends and Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity—Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity.”

The following table sets forth the dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity paid to holders of our common shares and preferred shares since January 1, 2011 inreaisand in U.S. dollars translated fromreaisat the commercial market selling rate in effect as of the payment date.

      NominalReais per   US$ equivalent per 

Year

  

Payment Date

  Common
Shares
   Preferred
Shares
   Common
Shares
   Preferred
Shares
 

2011

  May 9, 2011(1)   7.352     7.352     4.539     4.539  

2012

  August 27, 2012 (2)   6.097     6.097     3.004     3.004  

2013

  March 28, 2013 (3)   5.107     5.107     2.536     2.536  
  April 1, 2013 (4)   0.991     0.991     0.491     0.491  
  October 11, 2013 (5)   3.049     3.049     1.397     1.397  

(1)Represents interest attributable to shareholders’ equity of R$4.360 (US$2.692) per common and preferred share, plus dividends of R$2.992 (US$1.847) per common and preferred share.
(2)Represents dividends of R$3.095 (US$1,525) per common and preferred share, plus payment for the redemption of class B and class C preferred shares issued as a bonus and distributed to shareholders of our common and preferred shares in the total amount of R$3.002 (US$1.479) per common and preferred share.
(3)Represents dividends of R$5.107(US$2.536) per common and preferred share.
(4)Represents payment for the redemption of class B and class C preferred shares issued as a bonus and distributed to shareholders of common and preferred shares of the Company in the total amount of R$0.991(US$0.491) per common and preferred share.
(5)Represents dividends of R$3.049 (US$1.397) per common and preferred share.

The following discussion summarizes the principal provisions of the Brazilian Corporation Law and our by-laws relating to the distribution of dividends, including interest attributable to shareholders’ equity.

Calculation of Adjusted Net Profit

At each annual shareholders’ meeting, our board of directors is required to recommend how to allocate our net profit for the preceding fiscal year, which recommendation our board of executive officers initially submits to our board of directors for approval. This allocation is subject to approval by our common shareholders. The Brazilian Corporation Law defines “net profit” for any fiscal year as our net income after income taxes for that fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and any amounts allocated to employees’ participation in our net profit in that fiscal year. Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, our adjusted net profit available for distribution are equal to our net profit in any fiscal year, reduced by amounts allocated to our legal reserve and other applicable reserves, and increased by any reversals of reserves that we constituted in prior years.

Our calculation of net profit and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP.

Reserve Accounts

As required by the Brazilian Corporation Law and as provided for in our by-laws, we maintain a legal reserve. In addition, we are permitted by the Brazilian Corporation Law to establish the following discretionary reserves:

a contingency reserve for an anticipated loss that is deemed probable in future years. Any amount so allocated in a previous year must be reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss had been anticipated if the loss does not occur as projected or charged off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs;

a reserve for investment projects, in an amount based on a capital expenditure budget previously approved by our shareholders;

a special goodwill reserve for the merger, which represents the net amount of the counterpart of the premium amount recorded in the asset, pursuant to provisions of CVM Instruction No. 319/1999;

an unrealized income reserve described under “—Mandatory Distributions” below; and

a tax incentive investment reserve, included in our capital reserve accounts, in the amount of the reduction in our income tax obligations due to government tax incentive programs.

Allocations to each of these reserves (other than the legal reserve) are subject to approval by our common shareholders voting at our annual shareholders’ meeting.

The Brazilian Corporation Law provides that the legal reserve and the tax incentive investment reserve may be credited to shareholders’ equity or used to absorb losses, but these reserves are unavailable for the payment of distributions in subsequent years. The amounts allocated to the other reserves may be credited to shareholders’ equity and used for the payment of distributions in subsequent years.

Legal Reserve Account

Under the Brazilian Corporation Law and our by-laws, we must allocate 5% of our net profit for each fiscal year to our legal reserve until the aggregate amount of our legal reserve equals 20% of our paid-in capital. However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a fiscal year in which our legal reserve, when added to our other reserves, exceeds 30% of our shareholders’ equity. At December 31, 2015, we used this reserve to offset losses.

Capital Reserve Accounts

Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, we are also permitted to record a capital reserve that may be used only (1) to absorb losses which exceed retained earnings and income reserves as defined in the Brazilian Corporation Law, (2) to redeem or repurchase share capital and/or participation certificates, (3) to increase our capital, or (4) if specified in our by-laws (which currently do not so specify), to pay preferred share dividends. Amounts allocated to our capital reserves are unavailable for the payment of distributions and are not taken into consideration for purposes of determining the mandatory distributable amount. At December 31, 2015, we had a balance of R$18,745 million in our capital reserve account

Dividend Preference of Preferred Shares

As permitted by the Brazilian Corporation Law, our by-laws specify that 25% of our adjusted net income for each fiscal year must be distributed to shareholders as dividends or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity. We refer to this amount as the mandatory distributable amount. Distributions of dividends in any year are made:

first, to the holders of preferred shares, up to the greater non-cumulative amount of: (1) 6.0% per year of the amount resulting from our share capital divided by the number of our total issued shares, or (2) 3.0% per year of the book value of our shareholders’ equity divided by the number of our total issued shares, or the Minimum Preferred Dividend;

then, to the holders of common shares, until the amount distributed in respect of each common share is equal to the amount distributed in respect of each preferred share; and

thereafter, to the common and preferred shareholders on apro rata basis.

If the Minimum Preferred Dividend is not paid for a period of three years, holders of preferred shares shall be entitled to full voting rights.

Mandatory Distributions

The mandatory distributable amount of dividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity is recognized as a provision at the year-end. Any proposed dividends above the mandatory distributable amount are only recognized when declared.

Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, the amount by which the mandatory distributable amount exceeds the “realized” portion of net income for any particular year may be allocated to the unrealized income reserve, and the mandatory distribution may be limited to the “realized” portion of net income. The “realized” portion of net income is the amount by which our net income exceeds the sum of (1) our net positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting for earnings and losses of our subsidiaries and certain associated companies, and (2) the profits, gains or income obtained on transactions maturing after the end of the following fiscal year. As amounts allocated to the unrealized income reserve are realized in subsequent years, such amounts must be added to the dividend payment relating to the year of realization.

According to our by-laws, by proposal of our executive officers and board of directors, a portion corresponding to up to 75% of our adjusted net income, must be used to form an equity replenishment reserve, in order to replenish our capital and equity position to be used for investments and debt reduction. The remaining balance will be allocated as approved by the shareholders. The balance of the equity replenishment reserve,plus the balances of the other profit reserves,minus the realizable profit reserves and reserves for contingencies, may not exceed 100% of the capital stock and, upon reaching the 100% threshold, the shareholders may decide to use excess funds to increase capital stock or to distribute dividends.

The Brazilian Corporation Law permits us to suspend the mandatory distribution in respect of common shares and preferred shares if our board of directors reports to our annual shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be incompatible with our financial condition at that time. Our fiscal council must approve any suspension of the mandatory distribution. In addition, our management must report the reasons of any suspension of the mandatory distribution to the CVM. We must allocate net profit not distributed by our company as a result of a suspension to a special reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, we must distribute these amounts as soon as our financial condition permits. In case our profits reserves, as defined in the Brazilian Corporation Law, exceed our share capital, the excess must be credited to shareholders’ equity or used for the payment of distributions.

Payment of Dividends and Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity

We may pay the mandatory distributable amount as dividends or as interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, which is similar to a dividend but is deductible in calculating our income tax obligations.

Because ourOi’s shares are issued in book-entry form, dividends with respect to any share are automatically credited to the account holding such share. Shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register with the Brazilian Central Bank in order for dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares to be eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil.

The commonCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying our ADSs are held in Brazil by the depositary, which has registered with the Brazilian Central Bank as the registered owner of our commonsuch Common Shares and preferred shares.Preferred Shares. Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilian currency to the depositary. The depositary will then convert such proceeds into dollars and will cause such dollars to be distributed to holders of our ADSs. As with other types of remittances from Brazil, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil, as it did for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1999, and on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies, which could hinder or prevent the

depositary from converting dividends into U.S. dollars and remitting these U.S. dollars abroad. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Ourthe Common Shares, Preferred Shares and the ADSs.”

See “Item 10. Additional Information— Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations” for information regarding Brazilian tax implicationsDistributions of dividends, andincluding interest attributable to shareholders’ equity.equity, in any year are made:

Dividends

Our first, to the holders of Preferred Shares, up to the greaternon-cumulative amount of: (1) 6.0% per year of the amount resulting from Oi’s share capital divided by the number of Oi’s total issued shares, or (2) 3.0% per year of the book value of Oi’s shareholders’ equity divided by the number of Oi’s total issued shares, or the Minimum Preferred Dividend;

then, to the holders of Common Shares, until the amount distributed in respect of each Common Share is equal to the amount distributed in respect of each Preferred Share; and

thereafter, to the holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares on apro rata basis.

Under Oi’sby-laws, require if the Minimum Preferred Dividend is not paid for a period of three years, holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to full voting rights. As a result of Oi’s failure to pay the Minimum Preferred Dividend for 2014, 2015 and 2016, holders of Oi’s Preferred Shares obtained full voting rights on April 28, 2017, the date that we hold anOi’s annual shareholders’ meeting which, pursuant to Brazilian Corporation Law, must be held by April 30 of each year. Atapproved our annual shareholders’ meeting, our common shareholders may vote to declare an annual dividend. Our payment of annual dividends is based on our audited financial statements prepared for our preceding fiscal year.

Any holder of record of shares at the time that a dividend is declared is entitled to receive dividends. Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, we are generally required to pay dividends within 60 days after declaring them, unless the shareholders’ resolution establishes another payment date, which, in any case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared.2016.

Our boardHistorical Payment of directors may declare interimDividends

Oi has not paid any dividends based on the accrued profits recorded and/or the realized profits in our annual or semi-annual financial statements. In addition, we may pay dividends from net income based on our unaudited quarterly financial statements. We may set off any paymentinterest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

Taxation of interim dividends against the amount of the mandatory distributable amount for the year in which the interim dividends were paid.Dividends

Under the current Brazilian tax law, dividends paid to persons who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, willare not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995, which may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying tax rates. See “Item 10. Additional Information— Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity

Brazilian companies, including our company, are permitted to pay interest attributable to shareholders’ equity as an alternative form of payment of dividends to our shareholders. These payments may be deducted when calculating Brazilian income tax and social contribution tax. The interest rate applied to these distributions generally cannot exceed the TJLP for the applicable period. The amount of interest paid that we can deduct for tax purposes cannot exceed the greater of:

50% of our net income (after the deduction of the provision for social contribution tax and before the deduction of the provision for corporate income tax) before taking into account any such distribution for the period for which the payment is made; and

50% of the sum of our retained earnings and income reserves.

Any payment of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity to holders of our common sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or preferred shares or our ADSs, whether or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to Brazilian withholding tax at the rate of 15%, except that a 25% withholding tax rate applies if the recipient is domiciled in a residentFavorable Tax Jurisdiction. For information regarding Brazilian tax implications of a “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purpose. The definition of “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purpose includes countriesdividends and locations (a) that do not impose income tax, (b) that impose income tax at a rate of 20% or less, or (c) where local laws do not allow accessinterest attributable to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owner of earnings that are attributed to non-residents. On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian Revenue Service issued Rule No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a “tax favorable jurisdiction” from 20% to 17%. Seeshareholders’ equity, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations” below for a discussionConsiderations.”

Holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs may also be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on dividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity. For more information on the definitionU.S. federal income tax implications of “tax haven” jurisdiction being broadened by an interpretation of Law No. 11,727. Under our by-laws, we may include the amount distributed asdividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, net of any withholding tax, as part of the mandatory distributable amount.see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

There are ongoing discussions in Congress regarding possible changes to the tax treatment of interest on shareholders’ equity. There can be no assurance that the current tax treatment will continue to be available in the future.

Prescription of Payments

Our shareholders have three years to claim dividend distributions made with respect to their shares, as from the date that we distribute the dividends to our shareholders, after which any unclaimed dividend distributions legally revert to us. We are not required to adjust the amount of any distributions for inflation that occurs during the period from the date of declaration to the payment date.

Significant Changes

Other than as disclosed in this annual report, no significant change has occurred since the date of the audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

 

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

Markets for OurOi’s Equity Securities

The principal trading market for our common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares is the BM&FBOVESPA,B3, where they are traded under the symbols “OIBR3” and “OIBR4,” respectively. Our common shares and preferred shares began trading on the BM&FBOVESPA on July 10, 1992. On November 16, 2001, our PreferredOi’s Common ADSs began tradingtrade on the NYSE under the symbol “BTM.“OIBR.C.On November 17, 2009, our Common ADSs began trading onThe OTC Markets Group, Inc. publishes quotations for Oi’s Preferred ADS in the NYSE“pink sheets” under the trading symbol “BTMC.” On April 9, 2012, the trading symbols for our Preferred ADSs and Common ADSs on the NYSE were changed to “OIBR” and “OIBR.C,” respectively.OIBRQ.

We have registered our Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act. On December 31, 2015, there were 21,168,498 Common ADSs, representing 21,168,498 common shares, or 20.36% of our outstanding common shares, and 43,376,418 Preferred ADSs outstanding, representing 43,376,418 preferred shares, or 27.82% of our outstanding preferred shares.

Price History of Our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and the ADSs

The tables below set forth the high and low closing sales prices and the approximate average daily trading volume for our common shares and preferred shares on the BM&FBOVESPA and the high and low closing sales prices and the approximate average daily trading volume for the Common ADSs and the Preferred ADSs on the NYSE for the periods indicated.

   BM&FBOVESPA   NYSE 
   Reais per Preferred Share(1)(2)   U.S. dollars per Preferred ADS(1)(3) 
   

 

Closing Price per
Preferred Share

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
shares)

   

 

Closing Price per
Preferred ADS

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
Preferred ADSs)

 
  High   Low     High   Low   
   (in reais)       (in U.S. dollars)     

2011

   167.70     101.50     81.9     104.10     54.40     72.3  

2012

   127.30     75.20     437.1     70.00     36.70     234.3  

2013

   91.70     33.40     1,009.0     44.20     14.60     389.7  

2014

   44.20     8.61     3,692.3     18.80     3.17     1,263.4  

2015

   8.43     1.30     4,608.5     3.15     0.34     2,327.2  

2014

            

First Quarter

   44.20     31.20     1,107     18.80     13.30     712.9  

Second Quarter

   33.00     18.30     4,584     14.70     8.00     1,559.1  

   BM&FBOVESPA   NYSE 
   Reais per Preferred Share(1)(2)   U.S. dollars per Preferred ADS(1)(3) 
   

 

Closing Price per
Preferred Share

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
shares)

   

 

Closing Price per
Preferred ADS

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
Preferred ADSs)

 
  High   Low     High   Low   
   (in reais)       (in U.S. dollars)     

Third Quarter

   18.10     11.90     5,309     8.00     5.20     1,639.2  

Fourth Quarter

   16.70     8.61     3,679     6.70     3.17     1,038.0  

2015

            

First Quarter

   8.43     4.96     4,933.0     3.15     1.54     3,854.3  

Second Quarter

   7.07     5.56     3,118.6     2.24     1.82     2,634.9  

Third Quarter

   5.66     2.47     3,598.0     1.81     0.62     1,920.6  

Fourth Quarter

   3.67     1.30     6,871.0     0.95     0.34     975.3  

2016

            

First Quarter

   1.89     1.15     3,258.9     0.45     0.26     402.9  

Most Recent Six Months

            

November 2015

   2.21     1.76     3,902.0     0.63     0.46     629.2  

December 2015

   2.09     1.30     4,816.3     0.51     0.34     581.8  

January 2016

   1.84     1.42     2,943.1     0.43     0.35     349.9  

February 2016

   1.89     1.21     2,861.1     0.45     0.26     375.0  

March 2016

   1.45     1.15     3,875.3     0.34     0.29     475.0  

April 2016

   1.15     0.92     3,443.6     0.33     0.26     273.6  

May 2016(3)

   1.07     1.02     1,860.2     0.31     0.26     92.0  

(1)Adjusted to reflect the reverse split of all of our issued preferred shares into one preferred share for each 10 issued preferred shares that became effective on December 22, 2014.
(2)Adjusted to reflect change of ratio from three preferred shares per Preferred ADS to one preferred share per Preferred ADS effective as of August 15, 2012.
(3)Through May 13, 2016.

Source: Economática Ltda./ Bloomberg

   BM&FBOVESPA   NYSE 
   Reais per Common Share(1)   U.S. dollars per Common ADS(1) 
   

 

Closing Price per
Common Share

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
shares)

   

 

Closing Price per
Common ADS

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
Common ADSs)

 
  High   Low     High   Low   
   (in reais)       (in U.S. dollars)     

2011

   184.50     112.50     7.0     582.5     292.5     0.3  

2012

   142.00     87.10     58.2     392.0     201.5     2.0  

2013

   101.70     35.40     169.7     251.5     75.0     1.9  

2014

   48.80     9.15     467.8     101.5     16.6     36.3  

2015

   9.12     2.06     1,060.8     16.4     2.5     57.7  

2014

            

First Quarter

   48.80     32.00     137.7     101.50     70.00     1.2  

Second Quarter

   32.70     19.50     637.4     78.50     42.00     68.5  

Third Quarter

   19.60     12.40     646.0     43.25     27.38     45.7  

Fourth Quarter

   17.40     9.15     441.5     35.23     16.55     27.7  

2015

            

First Quarter

   9.12     5.14     753.2     16.35     8.15     54.9  

   BM&FBOVESPA   NYSE 
   Reais per Common Share(1)   U.S. dollars per Common ADS(1) 
   

 

Closing Price per
Common Share

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
shares)

   

 

Closing Price per
Common ADS

   

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of
Common ADSs)

 
  High   Low     High   Low   
   (in reais)       (in U.S. dollars)     

Second Quarter

   7.05     5.58     789.8     11.25     8.80     43.8  

Third Quarter

   5.76     2.47     856.0     9.15     3.05     37.3  

Fourth Quarter

   3.86     2.06     1,867.7     5.35     2.50     94.1  

2016

            

First Quarter

   2.55     1.05     3,587.2     3.55     1.40     182.3  

Most Recent Six Months

            

November 2015

   3.79     2.89     1,286.3     5.35     4.00     85.7  

December 2015

   2.78     2.06     1,883.7     4.10     2.50     77.8  

January 2016

   2.55     2.08     1,218.9     3.55     2.65     55.8  

February 2016

   2,.55     1.26     3,025.3     3.36     1.50     176.2  

March 2016

   1.32     1.05     6,117.8     1.70     1.40     296.9  

April 2016

   1.06     0.81     6,093.2     1.45     1.06     77.9  

May 2016(2)

   0.85     0.80     3,824     1.24     1.11     49.9  

(1)Adjusted to reflect the reverse split of all of our issued common shares into one common share for each 10 issued common shares that became effective on December 22, 2014 and change in the ratio applicable to our Common ADSs as a result of which each Common ADS which formerly represented one common share has represented five common shares since February 1, 2016.
(2)Through May 13, 2016.

Source: Economática Ltda./ Bloomberg

On May 13, 2016, the closing sales price of:

our common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA was R$0.81 per common share;

our Common ADSs on the NYSE was US$1.12 per Common ADS;

our preferred shares on the BM&FBOVESPA was R$1.02 per preferred share; and

our Preferred ADSs on the NYSE was US$0.26 per Preferred ADS.

Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets

The Brazilian securities markets are regulated by the CVM, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and the securities markets generally, the National Monetary Council and the Brazilian Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and which regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Brazilian securities markets are governed by (1) Law No. 6,385, as amended and supplemented, which is the principal law governing the Brazilian securities markets, (2) the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, and (3) the regulations issued by the CVM, the National Monetary Council and the Brazilian Central Bank.

These laws and regulations provide for, among other things, disclosure requirements applicable to issuers of publicly traded securities, restrictions on insider trading (including criminal sanctions under the Brazilian Penal Code) and price manipulation, protection of minority shareholders and disclosure of transactions in a company’s

securities by its insiders, including directors, officers and major shareholders. They also provide for the licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and the governance of Brazilian stock exchanges.

However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated or supervised as U.S. securities markets or securities markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States, which may put holders of our preferred sharesCommon Shares and theCommon ADSs at a disadvantage. Finally, corporate disclosures also may be less complete than for public companies in the United States and certain other jurisdictions.

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, a company is either publicly held (companhia aberta), as we are,Oi is, or privately held (companhia fechada). All publicly held companies are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting and regulatory requirements. A company registered with CVM may have its securities traded either on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 or in the Brazilianover-the-counter market. Shares of companies, such as our company,Oi, that are listed on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 may not simultaneously trade on the Brazilianover-the-counter market. The shares of a publicly held company may also be traded privately, subject to certain limitations.

The Brazilianover-the-counter market consists of direct trades between individuals in which a financial institution registered with the CVM serves as intermediary. No special application, other than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market. The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilianover-the-counter market by the respective intermediaries.

Disclosure Requirements

Law No. 6,385 requires that a publicly traded company, such as our company, submit to the CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA certain periodic information, including annual and quarterly reports prepared by management and independent auditors. Law No. 6,385 also requires us to file with the CVM our shareholders’ agreements, notices of shareholders’ meetings and copies of the minutes of these meetings.

CVM Instruction No. 358, which became effective in April 2002, revised and consolidated the requirements regarding the disclosure and use of information related to material facts and acts of publicly traded companies, including the disclosure of information in the trading and acquisition of securities issued by publicly traded companies.

CVM Instruction No. 358 includes provisions that:

establish the concept of a material fact that gives rise to reporting requirements. Material facts include decisions made by the controlling shareholders, resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders and of management of the company, or any other facts related to the company’s business (whether occurring within the company or otherwise related thereto) that may influence the price of its publicly traded securities, or the decision of investors to trade such securities or to exercise any of such securities’ underlying rights;

specify examples of facts that are considered to be material, which include, among others, the execution of agreements providing for the transfer of control, the entry or withdrawal of shareholders that maintain any managing, financial, technological or administrative function with or contribution to the company, and any corporate restructuring undertaken among related companies;

require the investor relations officer, controlling shareholders, other officers or directors, members of the fiscal council and other advisory boards to disclose material facts;

require simultaneous disclosure of material facts to all markets in which the company’s securities are admitted for trading;

require the acquirer of a controlling stake in a company to publish material facts, including its intentions as to whether or not to de-list the company’s shares, within one year;

establish rules regarding disclosure requirements in the acquisition and disposal of a material shareholding stake; and

prohibit trading on the basis of material non-public information.

Brazilian regulations also require that any person or group of persons representing the same interest that has directly or indirectly acquired ancarried out a material transaction or set of transactions by which the equity interest corresponding toheld by such person or group of persons surpasses or falls below the thresholds of 5%, or any 5% multiple thereof, of a type or class of shares of a publicly traded company must provide such publicly traded company with information on such acquisitiontransaction and its purpose, and such company must transmit this information to the CVM. If this acquisition causes a change in the control of the company or in the administrative structure of the company, or if this acquisition triggers the obligation to make a public offering in accordance with CVM Instruction No. 361, as amended, then the acquirer must disclose this information to the applicable stock exchanges and the appropriate Brazilian newspapers. Such obligation is also triggered whenever the equity interest directly or indirectly held by such person or groupsame means of persons representing the same interest increases or decreases to 5%, or any 5% multiple thereof, of a type or class of shares.

Integrated Disclosure

CVM Instruction No. 480, which the CVM issued in December 2009:

created two different categories of securities issuers in accordance with the securities that those issuers are authorized to issue in the Brazilian regulated markets and established different disclosure requirements for each category. A category A issuer is authorized to issue any and all securities and is subject to more stringent disclosure requirements. A category B issuer is authorized to issue any and all securities, other than shares, share certificates and other securities issuedcommunication usually adopted by the issuer of such shares or shares certificates or by a company of its group that grants to its holders the right to acquire such shares or shares certificates.

company.

created the current CVM form for annual reports (Formulário de Referência). TheFormulário de Referência requires extensive disclosures in several areas, including, among others, management’s discussion and analysis of the financial statements, management compensation and risk controls and derivative policies.

introduced a requirement that an issuer publish an offering note with respect to a public securities offering with information on the public securities offering to supplement theFormulário de Referência.

classified as Well-Known Seasoned Issuers (Emissor de Grande Exposição ao Mercado) companies (1) that have had securities traded in the BM&FBOVESPA for at least three years, (2) that are in compliance with the CVM rules on current and periodic reporting obligations in the previous 12 months, and (3) which have shares traded in the market with a market value equal or greater than R$5 billion. The CVM is expected to issue regulations regarding which public securities offerings by Well-Known Seasoned Issuers that will permit these issuers to register public securities offerings through an expedited procedure.

Recommendations Regarding Business Combination Transactions Between Affiliated Companies

In September 2008, the CVM issued CVM Practice Bulletin No. 35/08 (Parecer de Orientação No. 35/08) recommending that where a controlling company and its subsidiaries or affiliated companies engage in a business combination transaction, certain additional procedures be followed to protect the non-controlling shareholders. The release constitutes guidance for Brazilian companies engaging in business combination transactions, and does not mandate that any procedure be followed. The release recommends that the constituent companies implement one of the following procedures in connection with a business combination transaction:

establish an independent advisory committee to protect the interests of the non-controlling shareholders and to negotiate the terms and conditions for such business combination transaction; or

condition the of approval of the business combination transaction upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the non-controlling shareholders of the controlled company, including the minority holders of the voting and the non-voting shares of the controlled company.

Proxy Solicitation Rules

CVM Instruction No. 481, which the CVM issued in December 2009, sets forth (1) the procedures relating to the public solicitation of proxies for the exercise of voting rights at shareholders’ meetings of publicly held companies, and (2) disclosure requirements to be followed by publicly held companies before such shareholders meetings.

CVM Instruction No. 481 provides that:

shareholders that own 0.5% or more of a company’s share capital may nominate members of the board of directors and the fiscal council in a public solicitation of proxies conducted by the company’s management, and that shareholders will be entitled to vote with respect to these nominations;

companies that accept digital proxies sent through the internet must allow shareholders who hold 0.5% or more of the company’s share capital to make a public solicitation of proxies through the company’s digital proxy system; and

publicly held companies that do not accept digital proxies sent through the internet must pay part of the costs of the public solicitation of proxies made by shareholders that own 0.5% or more of the company’s share capital.

CVM Instruction No. 481 also specifies the information and documents that must be made available to shareholders following the date of the publication of the first call notice for the shareholders’ meeting. The information and documents that must be provided varies according to the agenda of the shareholders’ meeting. This information must be available through the CVM’s website before the shareholders’ meeting, must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Instruction No. 481, and, if the information and documents relate to the annual shareholders’ meeting, must include management’s discussion and analysis of the financial statements, personal data and history of the nominees for election to the company’s board of directors and/or fiscal council, and a proposal for the compensation of the company’s management.

In 2015, CVM Instruction No. 481 was amended to provide the procedures relating to the exercise of distance voting by the shareholders at the shareholders’ meetings. The distance voting procedure is currently at the discretion of Brazilian publicly held companies and has not yet adopted by us. Such procedure will become mandatory (i) in January 2017, for publicly-held companies with at least one type or class of shares integrating IBrX-100 and IBOVESPA indexes; and (ii) in January 2018, for the other publicly-held companies with shares traded in the stock market.

Trading on the BM&FBOVESPAB3

Overview of the BM&FBOVESPAB3

In 2000, the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo S.A. – BVSP), or the BOVESPA was reorganized through the execution of memoranda of understanding by the Brazilian stock exchanges. Following this reorganization, the BOVESPA was anon-profit entity owned by its member brokerage firms and trading on the BOVESPA was limited to these member brokerage firms and a limited number of authorized nonmembers. Under the memoranda, all securities are now traded only on the BOVESPA, with the exception of electronically traded public debt securities and privatization auctions, which are traded on the Rio de Janeiro Stock Exchange.

In August 2007, the BOVESPA underwent a corporate restructuring that resulted in the creation of BOVESPA Holding S.A., a public corporation, whose wholly-owned subsidiaries were (1) the BOVESPA, which is responsible for the operations of the stock exchange and the organizedover-the-counter markets, and (2) the Brazilian

Settlement and Custodial Company (Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia), or CBLC, which is responsible for settlement, clearing and depositary services. In the corporate restructuring, all holders of membership certificates of the BOVESPA and of shares of CBLC became shareholders of BOVESPA Holding S.A. As a result of the corporate restructuring, access to the trading and other services rendered by the BOVESPA is not conditioned on stock ownership in BOVESPA Holding S.A.

In May 2008, the BOVESPA merged with the Commodities and Futures Exchange (Bolsa de Mercadorias & Futuros) to form the BM&FBOVESPA. In November 2008, the CBLC merged with the BM&FBOVESPA. As a result, the BM&FBOVESPA now performs its own settlement, clearing and depositary services. In March 2017, BM&FBOVESPA merged with Cetip S.A. – Mercados Organizados, a settlement and clearing house in Brazil to form the B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão.

Trading and Settlement

Trading of equity securities on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 is conducted through an electronic trading system called Megabolsa every business day, typically from 10:00 a.m. to 5:3000 p.m., São Paulo time. TradingDuring certain months, however, to account for daylight saving time in Brazil and more closely align with trading hours in the United States, trading hours on the B3 are extended by one hour to 6:00 p.m., São Paulo time. When trading ends at 5:00 p.m. São Paulo time, trading of equity securities on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 is also conducted after market between 6:005:25 p.m. and 7:306:00 p.m., São Paulo time, in an after-market system connected to both traditional brokerage firms and brokerage firms operating on the internet. This after-market trading is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility of securities and on the volume of shares traded by investors operating on the internet. When trading ends at 5:00 p.m. São Paulo time, there is no after-market trading.

Since March 2003, market making activities have been allowed on the BM&FBOVESPA. On July 23, 2012, we announcedB3. As of the engagementdate of Brasil Pluralthis annual report Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A. Corretora de Câmbio, Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A. (formerly known as Flow Corretora de Câmbio, Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.)acts as market maker of our common sharesthe Common Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares on the BM&FBOVESPA.B3. Trading in securities listed on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 may be effected off the exchange in the unorganizedover-the-counter market under certain circumstances, although such trading is very limited.

The trading of securities of a company on the BM&FBOVESPA may beB3 is automatically suspended at the request ofwhen a company in anticipation of the announcement ofCompany announces a material event. A requestingIt is also recommended that the company must alsosimultaneously make a request to suspend trading of its securities onin any international stock exchanges onexchange in which its securities are traded. The CVM and the BM&FBOVESPAB3 have discretionary authority to suspend trading in shares of a particular issuer, based on or due to a belief that, among other reasons, a company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the CVM or the BM&FBOVESPA.B3.

In order to reduce volatility, the BM&FBOVESPAB3 has adopted a “circuit breaker” mechanism under which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the Ibovespa index falls 10% or 15%, respectively, compared to the closing of the previous trading session. Also, if after the reopening of the market the Ibovespa falls 20% compared to the closing of the previous day, the operations are suspended for a certain period to be defined by the B3. This mechanism is not applied in the last half hour of the trading session.

Settlement of transactions on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 is effected threetwo business days after the trade date, without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. Delivery of and payment for shares is made through the facilities of the clearing and settlement chamber of the BM&FBOVESPA. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver shares to the clearing and settlement chamber of the BM&FBOVESPA on the second business day following the trade date.

Market Size

Although the Brazilian equity market is Latin America’s largest in terms of market capitalization, it is smaller, more volatile and less liquid than the major U.S. and European securities markets. Moreover, the BM&FBOVESPA is significantly less liquid than the NYSE or other major exchanges in the world.

As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate market capitalization of all companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA was equivalent to approximately R$1.9 trillion (US$490 billion) and the 10 largest companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA represented approximately 51% of the total market capitalization of all listed companies. By comparison, as of December 31, 2015, the aggregate market capitalization of the companies (including U.S. and non-U.S. companies) listed on the NYSE was approximately US$17.8 trillion. The average daily trading volume of the BM&FBOVESPA and the NYSE for 2015 was approximately R$6.8 billion (US$2.1 billion) and US$64.0 billion, respectively.

Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on the BM&FBOVESPA, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling persons, one principal shareholder or governmental entities that rarely trade their shares. For this reason, data showing the total market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA tends to overstate the liquidity of the Brazilian equity market. The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian equity markets may substantially limit your ability to sell our common shares or preferred shares at the time and price you desire and, as a result, could negatively impact the market price of these securities.B3.

Regulation of Foreign Investments

Trading on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or a non-Brazilian holder,Non-Brazilian Holder, is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment regulations. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holder may trade on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 only in accordance with the requirements of Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 of the National Monetary Council. Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 requires that securities held by non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holders be registered, maintained in the custody of, or maintained in deposit accounts with, financial institutions that are authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank and the CVM, as applicable. Subject to limited exceptions provided in the CVM regulation or previous CVM authorization, Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 requires non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holders (1) to restrict their securities trading to transactions on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 or qualifiedover-the-counter markets; and (2) to not transfer the ownership of investments made under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 through private transactions. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls—Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373”4,373,” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls—Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 – ADSs” for further information about Resolution No. 4,373, and “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for a description of certain tax benefits extended to non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holders who qualify under Resolution No. 4,373.

BM&FBOVESPAB3 Corporate Governance Standards

In December 2000, the BM&FBOVESPAB3 introduced three special listing segments:

 

Level 1 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices;

 

Level 2 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices; and

 

  

TheNovo Mercado (New Market).

These special listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to abide by corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those already required by Brazilian law. The inclusion of a company in any of the special listing segments requires adherence to a series of corporate governance rules. These rules were designed to increase shareholders’ rights and enhance the quality of information provided to shareholders.

OurOi’s shares joined Level 1 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices on December 14, 2012. As a Level 1 company, weOi must, among other things:

 

ensure that shares representing 25% of ourits total share capital are effectively available for trading;

 

adopt offering procedures that favor widespread ownership of shares whenever we makeOi makes a public offering;

 

comply with minimum quarterly disclosure standards, including issuing consolidated financial information, a cash flow statement, and special audit revisions on a quarterly basis;

 

follow stricter disclosure policies with respect to contracts with related parties, material contracts and transactions involving ourits securities made by ourits controlling shareholders, if any, directors or executive officers;

make a schedule of corporate events available to ourits shareholders; and

hold public meetings with analysts and investors at least annually.

Pursuant to the regulations of the BM&FBOVESPA,B3, the members of ourOi’s board of directors and board of executive officers are personally liable for ourits compliance with the rules and regulations of the BM&FBOVESPA’sB3’s Level 1 Listing Segment.

Moreover, in September 2015, Oi amended itsby-laws in order to comply with the rules of theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 even though Oi has not formally joined this special listing segment. These amendments include the requirement that at least 20% of the members of Oi’s board of directors be independent members as defined in the listing regulations of theNovo Mercado and Article 141, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Brazilian Corporate Law.

 

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Description of Our Company’s Oi’sBy-laws

The following is a summary of the material provisions of our Oi’sby-laws and of the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law. In Brazil, a company’sby-laws (estatuto social) are the principal governing document of a corporation (sociedade anônima). This summary also includes relevant provisions of the RJ Plan. In case of a conflict and/or discrepancy between the RJ Plan and Oi’sby-laws’ rules, the RJ Plan shall prevail.

General

OurOi’s registered name is Oi S.A., – In Judicial Reorganization, and ourits registered office is located in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. OurOi’s registration number with the Board of Trade of the State of Rio de Janeiro isNo. 33.3.0029520-8. We have Oi has been duly registered with the CVM under No. 11312 since March 27, 1980. OurOi’s headquarters are located in City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Our companyOi has a perpetual existence.

As of December 31, 20152019 and May 13, 2016, weApril 24, 2020, Oi had outstanding share capital of R$21,438,374,154.00,32,538,937,370.00, comprised of 825,760,9025,954,205,001 total shares, consisting of 668,033,6615,796,477,760 issued common sharesCommon Shares and 157,727,241 issued preferred shares,Preferred Shares, including 148,282,003 common shares30,595 Common Shares and 1,811,755 preferred sharesPreferred Shares held in treasury. All of ourOi’s outstanding share capital is fully paid. All of ourOi’s shares are without par value. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the aggregate number of our Oi’snon-voting and limited voting preferred shares may not exceedtwo-thirds of ourOi’s total outstanding share capital. In addition, ourOi’s board of directors may increase ourOi’s share capital to a number of common sharesCommon Shares equivalent to R$34,038,701,741.49,38,038,701,741.49, provided that no preferred sharesPreferred Shares are issued by the CompanyOi in public or private subscriptions.

Corporate Purposes

Under Article 2 of our Oi’sby-laws, our Oi’s corporate purposes are:

 

to offer telecommunications services and all activities required or useful for the operation of these services, in conformity with ourits concessions, authorizations and permits;

 

to participate in the capital of other companies;

 

to organize wholly-owned subsidiaries for the performance of activities that are consistent with ourits corporate purposes and recommended to be decentralized;

 

to import, or promote the importation of, goods and services that are necessary to the performance of activities consistent with ourits corporate purposes;

 

to provide technical assistance services to other telecommunications companies engaged in activities of common interest;

to perform study and research activities aimed at the development of the telecommunications sector;

 

to enter into contracts and agreements with other telecommunications companies or other persons or entities to assure the operations of ourits services, with no loss of its attributions and responsibilities; and

 

to perform other activities related to the above corporate purposes.

Board of Directors

Oi’sby-laws provide for a board of directors of up to 11 members with no alternate members. Members who are absent at meetings will be entitled to appoint a substitute among the present members to vote in their stead. Under our Oi’sby-laws, any matters subject to the approval of ourOi’s board of directors can be approved only by a majority of votes of the members of ourOi’s board of directors. In the event of a tie, the chairman of the board of directors shall cast the deciding vote. Under our Oi’sby-laws, our Oi’s board of directors may only deliberate if a majority of its members are present at a duly convened meeting.

Oi’s board of directors is presided over by the chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by the vice-chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by another member appointed by the chairman or, if no such member has been appointed, by another member appointed by the other members in attendance. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, the chairman and vice-chairman of Oi’s board of directors are elected by the members of the Oi’s board of directors during their first meeting following their election. Oi’sby-laws provide that the positions of chairman of Oi’s board of directors and Oi’s chief executive officer or principal executive may not be held by the same person.

The following paragraphs describe the material provisions of Oi’sby-laws and of the Brazilian Corporate Law that apply to the members of Oi’s board of directors.

Election of Directors

The members of ourOi’s board of directors are elected at general meetings of shareholders for concurrenttwo-year terms. terms and are eligible for reelection.

Generally, members of Oi’s board of directors are subject to removal at any time with or without cause at a general meeting of shareholders. The RJ Plan, however, provides certain corporate governance rules that apply to Oi’s board of directors during the effectiveness of the RJ Plan, superseding the provisions of Oi’sby-laws. As provided in the RJ Plan, until the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, which will occur on September 17, 2020, the members of Oi’s board of directors may not be removed from office, except due to gross mistake, willful misconduct, gross negligence, abuse of term of office or violation of fiduciary duties in accordance with applicable law. Following the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, the election of subsequent boards of directors will follow the rules established by Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law.

The tenure of the members of the board of directors and board of executive officers will beis conditioned on such members signing a Term of Consent (Termo de Anuência dos Administradores) in accordance with the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the BM&FBOVESPAB3 and complying with applicable legal requirements.

Qualification of Directors

There is no minimum share ownership or citizenship or residency requirement to qualify for membership on ourOi’s board of directors. Our Oi’sby-laws do not require the members of ourits board of directors to be residents of Brazil. The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law requires each of ourOi’s executive officers to be residents of Brazil. The tenure of the members of the board of directors will be conditioned toon the appointment of a representative who resides in Brazil, with powers to receive service of process in proceedings initiated against such member based on the corporate legislation, by means of apower-of-attorney with a validity term of at least three years after the end of thesuch member’s term of office. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s directors may not (1) hold positions, particularly positions in advisory, management or audit committees, of companies that compete with Oi or its subsidiaries, and (2) may not have conflicts of interest with Oi or its subsidiaries.

Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, at least 20% of the members of Oi’s board of directors must be independent as defined in the listing regulations of theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 and must be expressly declared as independent in the shareholders’ meeting that elects them, being also considered as independent the members elected as per article 141, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Brazilian Corporate Law. All of the members of Oi’s board of directors are independent.

Fiduciary Duties and Conflicts of Interest

All members of ourOi’s board of directors and their alternates owe fiduciary duties to usOi and all of ourOi’s shareholders.

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, if one of ourOi’s directors or his or her respective alternate or one of our executive officers has a conflict of interest with our companyOi in connection with any proposed transaction, such director, alternate director or executive officer may not vote in any decision of ourOi’s board of directors or of ourOi’s board of executive officers, as the case may be, regarding such transaction and must disclose the nature and extent of his or her conflicting interest for inclusion in the minutes of the applicable meeting. However, if one of our directors is absent from a meeting of our board of directors, that director’s alternate may vote even if that director has a conflict of interest, unless the alternate director shares that conflict of interest or has another conflict of interest.

Any transaction in which one of ourOi’s directors (including the alternate members) or executive officers may have an interest, including any financings, can only be approved on reasonable and fair terms and conditions that are no more favorable than the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties. If any such transaction does not meet this requirement, then the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law provides that the transaction may be nullified and the interested director or executive officer must return to usOi any benefits or other advantages that he or she obtained from, or as result of, such transaction. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and upon the request of a shareholder who owns at least 5.0% of ourOi’s total share capital, ourOi’s directors and executive officers must reveal to ourOi’s shareholders at an ordinary meeting of ourOi’s shareholders certain transactions and circumstances that may give rise to a conflict of interest. In addition, our companyOi or shareholdersany shareholder who ownowns 5.0% or more of ourOi’s share capital may bring an action for civil liability against directors and executive officers for any losses caused to usOi as a result of a conflict of interest.

Compensation

Under our Oi’sby-laws, our common shareholders holders of Common Shares approve the aggregate compensation payable to ourOi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and members of our fiscal council. Subject to this approval, ourOi’s board of directors establishes the compensation of its members and of ourOi’s executive officers. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Compensation.”

Mandatory Retirement

Neither the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law nor our Oi’sby-laws establish any mandatory retirement age for ourOi’s directors or executive officers.

Share Capital

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the number of ourOi’s issued and outstandingnon-voting shares or shares with limited voting rights, such as our preferred shares,Preferred Shares, may not exceedtwo-thirds of ourOi’s total outstanding share capital.

Each of our common sharesCommon Share entitles its holder to one vote at ourOi’s annual and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Holders of our common sharesCommon Shares are not entitled to any preference in respect of our dividends or other distributions or otherwise in case of ourOi’s liquidation.

Our preferred sharesPreferred Shares arenon-voting, except in limited circumstances, and do not have priority over our common sharesCommon Shares in the case of ourOi’s liquidation. See “—Voting Rights” for information regarding the voting rights of ourOi’s preferred shares and “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy—Calculation of Adjusted Net Profit” and “—Dividend Preference of Preferred Shares”Policy” for information regarding the distribution preferences of ourPreferred Shares.

The issuance of new preferred shares.shares by Oi is prohibited.

Shareholders’ Meetings

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, weOi’s shareholders must hold antheir ordinary annual shareholders’ meeting by April 30 of each year in order to:

 

approve or reject the financial statements approved by ourOi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, including any recommendation by ourOi’s board of directors for the allocation of net profit and distribution of dividends; and

 

elect members of ourOi’s board of directors (upon expiration of theirtwo-year terms) and members of ourOi’s fiscal council.

In addition to the annual shareholders’ meetings, holders of our common sharesCommon Shares have the power to determine any matters related to changes in ourOi’s corporate purposes and to pass any resolutions they deem necessary to protect and enhance ourOi’s development whenever ourOi’s interests so require, by means of extraordinary shareholders’ meetings.

We convene ourOi convenes shareholders’ meetings, including ourthe annual shareholders’ meeting, by publishing a notice in the national edition ofValor Econômico, a Brazilian newspaper, and in the Official Gazette of the stateState of Rio de Janeiro (Diário Oficial do Estado do Rio de Janeiro).Janeiro. Under the rules of the CVM,Brazilian Corporate Law, on the first call of any meeting, the notice must be published no fewer than three times, beginning at least 15 calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting date, and companies that have issued ADSs must publish their notice at least 30 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Oi publishes notices of meetings 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting date. The notice must contain the meeting’s place, date, time, agenda and, in the case of a proposed amendment to our Oi’sby-laws, a description of the subject matter of the proposed amendment.

OurOi’s board of directors may convene a shareholders’ meeting. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, shareholders’ meetings also may be convened by ourOi’s shareholders as follows:

 

by any of ourOi’s shareholders if, under certain circumstances set forth in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, ourOi’s directors do not convene a shareholders’ meeting required by law within 60 days;

 

by shareholders holding at least 5% of ourOi’s total share capital if, after a period of eight days, ourOi’s directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting that has been requested by such shareholders; and

by shareholders holding at least 5% of either ourOi’s total voting share capital or ourOi’s totalnon-voting share capital, if after a period of eight days, ourOi’s directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of appointing a fiscal council that has been requested by such shareholders.

In addition, ourOi’s fiscal council may convene a shareholders’ meeting if ourOi’s board of directors does not convene an annual shareholders’ meeting within 30 days or at any other time to consider any urgent and serious matters.

Each shareholders’ meeting shall be convened and presided over by the chairman of the board of directors.directors or his or her valid proxy. In the case of absence or impediment of the chairman or his or her proxy, the meeting shall be convened and presided over by the vice-chairman of the board of directors or his or her valid proxy. In the case of absence of the vice-chairman or his or her proxy, the meeting shall be convened and presided by any director chosenpresent at the meeting; and if all other directors are absent or impeded, the shareholders present atmeeting. The chairman of the meeting shall be responsible for choosing the chairman and the secretary of the board of directors.meeting.

In order for a valid action to be taken at a shareholders’ meeting, shareholders representing at least 25% of ourOi’s issued and outstanding voting share capital must be present on first call. However, shareholders representing at leasttwo-thirds of ourOi’s issued and outstanding voting share capital must be present on first call at a shareholders’ meeting called to amend our Oi’sby-laws. If a quorum is not present, ourOi’s board of directors may issue a second call by publishing a notice as described above at least eight calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting. Except as otherwise provided by law, the quorum requirements do not apply to a meeting held on the second call, and the shareholders’ meetings may be convened with the presence of shareholders representing any number of shares (subject to the voting requirements for certain matters described below). A shareholder without a right to vote may attend a shareholders’ meeting and take part in the discussion of matters submitted for consideration.

Voting Rights

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and our Oi’sby-laws, each of our common sharesCommon Share entitles its holder to one vote at ourOi’s shareholders’ meetings. Our preferred sharesPreferred Shares generally do not confer voting rights, except in limited circumstances described below. WeOi may not restrain or deny any voting rights without the consent of the majority of the shares affected. Whenever the shares of any class of share capital are entitled to vote, each share is entitled to one vote.

In accordance with article 72 of our by-laws, any shareholder of our company or group of shareholders representing a common interest or bound by a voting agreement that holds a stake of more than 15% of the number of shares into which the voting capital stock of Company is divided will have their voting rights limited to 15% of the number of shares of our company in which the voting capital stock is divided. Currently, such limitation is being applied to the votes corresponding to the shares held by Bratel B.V. and Pharol, which taken together, exceed the 15% threshold of our voting capital.

Voting Rights of Common Shares

Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a shareholders’ meeting are passed by a simple majority vote of the holders of our common sharesCommon Shares present or represented at the meeting, without taking abstentions into account. Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the approval of shareholders representing at least half of ourOi’s outstanding voting shares is required for the types of action described below:

 

reducing the mandatory dividend set forth in our Oi’sby-laws;

 

changing ourits corporate purpose;

 

merging our companyOi with another company, or consolidating our company,Oi, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law;

 

  

transferring all of ourOi’s shares to another company, known as an “incorporação de ações” under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law;

  

participating in a centralized group of companies (grupo de sociedades) as defined under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law;

 

dissolving or liquidating our companyOi or canceling any ongoing liquidation of our company;liquidation;

 

  

creating any founders’ shares (partes beneficiárias) entitling the holders thereof to participate in the profits of our company;Oi’s profits; and

 

spinning-off of all or any part of our company.Oi.

Decisions on the transformation of our companyOi into another form of company require the unanimous approval of ourOi’s shareholders, including the holders of our preferred shares.Preferred Shares.

Our companyOi is required to give effect to shareholders’ agreements that contain provisions regarding the purchase or sale of ourOi’s shares, preemptive rights to acquire ourOi’s shares, the exercise of the right to vote ourOi’s shares or the power to control our company,Oi, if these agreements are filed with ourat Oi’s headquarters in Rio de Janeiro. Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law obligatesrequires the president of any shareholdermeeting of shareholders or board of directors meeting to disregard any vote taken by any of the parties to any shareholders’ agreement that has been duly filed with our companyOi that violates the provisions of any such agreement. In the event that a shareholder that is party to a shareholders’ agreement (or a director appointed by such shareholder) is absent from any shareholders’meeting of shareholders or board of directors’ meetingdirectors or abstains from voting, the other party or parties to that shareholders’ agreement have the right to vote the shares of the absent or abstaining shareholder (or on behalf of the absent director) in compliance with that shareholders’ agreement. Currently, noNo shareholders’ agreement affecting ourOi’s shares has been filed with ourat Oi’s headquarters in Rio de Janeiro.

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, neither our Oi’sby-laws nor actions taken at a shareholders’ meeting may deprive any of ourOi’s shareholders of certain specific rights, including:

 

the right to participate in the distribution of ourOi’s profits;

 

the right to participate in any remaining residual assets in the event of ourOi’s liquidation;

 

the right to supervise the management of ourOi’s corporate business as specified in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law;

 

the right to preemptive rights in the event of an issuance of ourOi’s shares, debentures convertible into ourOi’s shares or subscription bonuses, other than as provided in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law; and

 

the right to withdraw from our companyOi under the circumstances specified in the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law.

Voting Rights of Minority Shareholders

Shareholders holding shares representing not less than 5% of ourOi’s voting shares have the right to request that weOi adopt a cumulative voting procedure for the election of the members of ourOi’s board of directors. This procedure must be requested by the required number of shareholders at least 48 hours prior to a shareholders’ meeting.

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, shareholders that are not controlling shareholders, but that together hold either:

 

preferred shares

Preferred Shares representing at least 10% of ourOi’s total share capital; or

 

common shares

Common Shares representing at least 15% of ourOi’s voting capital,

have the right to appoint one member and an alternate to ourOi’s board of directors at ourOi’s annual shareholders’ meeting. If no group of our commonholders of Common Shares or preferred shareholdersPreferred Shares meets the thresholds described above, shareholders holding preferred sharesCommon Shares or common sharesPreferred Shares representing at least 10% of ourOi’s total share capital are entitled to combine their holdings to appoint one member and an alternate to ourOi’s board of directors. In the event that minority holders of common sharesCommon Shares and/or holders ofnon-voting preferred shares Preferred Shares elect a director and the cumulative voting procedures described above are also used, ourOi’s controlling shareholders, if any, always retain the right to elect at least one member more than the number of members elected by the other shareholders, regardless of the total number of members of ourOi’s board of directors. The shareholders seeking to exercise these minority rights must prove that they have held their shares for not less than three months preceding the shareholders’ meeting at which the director will be appointed.

Under our Oi’sby-laws, holders of preferred sharesPreferred Shares may appoint, by separate voting, one board member and one alternate.member.

In accordance with the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the holders of our preferred sharesPreferred Shares are entitled to elect one effective member and anthe respective alternate to ourOi’s fiscal council in a separate election. Minority shareholders have the same right as long as they jointly represent 10% or more of the voting shares. The other shareholders with the right to vote may elect the remaining members and alternates of the fiscal council, who, in any event, must exceed the number more thanof members elected in the directors and alternates electedseparate election by the holders of the preferred sharesPreferred Shares and the minority shareholders.

Voting Rights of Preferred Shares

Holders of our preferred sharesPreferred Shares are not entitled to vote on any matter, except:

 

with respect to the election of a member of ourOi’s board of directors by preferred shareholdersholders of Preferred Shares holding at least 10% of ourOi’s total share capital in a separate meeting as described above;

 

with respect to the election of a member and alternate member of ourOi’s fiscal council in a separate meeting as described above;

with respect to the approval of the contracting of foreign entities related to the controlling shareholders of our company,Oi, if any, to renderprovide management services, including technical assistance, in which decisions preferred sharesassistance. In these cases, Preferred Shares will have the right to vote separately from the common shares;Common Shares;

 

with respect to decisions relating to the employmentapproval of the contracting of foreign entities linkedrelated to the controlling shareholders of our company,Oi, if any, to provide management services, including technical assistance, if the remuneration for such services willwhich shall not exceed 0.2%0.1% of ourOi’s consolidated annual sales for fixed switched telephone service, network service transport telecommunicationsnet of taxes; and the mobile highway telephone service, after deductions of tax and contributions; and

 

in the limited circumstances described below.

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and our Oi’sby-laws provide that our preferred sharesPreferred Shares will acquire unrestricted voting rights afterand will be entitled to vote together with our Common Shares on all matters put to a vote in Oi’s shareholders’ meetings if the third consecutive fiscal year that we failMinimum Preferred Dividend (as determined in accordance with Oi’sby-laws and Brazilian Corporate Law) is not paid for a period of three years. As a result of Oi’s failure to pay the minimum dividends or fixed dividends to whichMinimum Preferred Dividend for 2014, 2015 and 2016, holders of our preferred shares are entitled. Preferred Shares obtained full voting rights on April 28, 2017, the date that Oi’s annual shareholders’ meeting approved our financial statements for fiscal year 2016.

This voting right will continue until the past due minimum dividenddate on which Oi pays the Minimum Preferred Dividend for any year in that three consecutive-yearthe then-most recently completed fiscal year. During the period is paid in full. Our preferred shareholdersduring which holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to vote together with Common Shares, holders of Preferred Shares will also obtain unrestricted voting rights if we enter intonot be entitled to the separate votes described above with respect to the election of a liquidation process.

Limitation on Voting Rights

Under our by-laws, any shareholder or groupmember of shareholders, representingOi’s board of directors, a member and alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council, the same interest or bound by a voting agreement, that hold or may hold in the future, alone or jointly, interest in the company representing more than 15% of our voting capital shall have its voting rights limited to 15%approval of the shares with voting rights.

The limitation above shall be deemed void and without effect in case (1)contracting of capital increaseforeign entities, or corporate reorganization that cause a dilution superiordecisions relating to 50%the employment of the corporate capital; (2) of public tender offer, in which the offering shareholder or a group of shareholders, bound by voting agreement, acquire more than 50% of the shares of the corporate capital; or (3) no shareholder or group of shareholders hold, alone or jointly, interests representing more than 15% of our voting capital.

Any declaration of vote that overcomes the limits of the by-laws shall not be computed in the shareholders’ meeting.foreign entities.

Liquidation

WeOi may be liquidated in accordance with the provisions of Brazilian law. In the event of ourOi’s extrajudicial liquidation, a shareholders’ meeting will determine the manner of ourOi’s liquidation and appoint ourOi’s liquidator and ourOi’s fiscal council that will function during the liquidation period.

Upon ourOi’s liquidation, our preferred sharesPreferred Shares do not have a liquidation preference over our common sharesCommon Shares in respect of the distribution of ourOi’s net assets, but shall be entitled to unrestricted voting rights. In the event of ourOi’s liquidation, the assets available for distribution to ourOi’s shareholders would be distributed to ourOi’s shareholders in an amount equal to theirpro rata share of ourOi’s legal capital. If the assets to be so distributed are insufficient to fully compensate our all of ourOi’s shareholders for their legal capital, each of ourOi’s shareholders would receive apro rataamount (based on theirpro ratashare of ourOi’s legal capital) of any assets available for distribution.

Preemptive Rights

Under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, each of ourOi’s shareholders has a general preemptive right to subscribe for ourOi’s shares or securities convertible into ourOi’s shares in any capital increase, in proportion to the number of ourOi’s shares held by such shareholder.

Under our Oi’sby-laws, our Oi’s board of directors or ourOi’s shareholders, as the case may be, may decide not to extend preemptive rights to ourOi’s shareholders with respect to any issuance of ourOi’s shares, debentures convertible into ourOi’s shares or warrants made in connection with a public exchange made to acquire control of another company or in connection with a public offering or sale through a stock exchange. The preemptive rights are transferable and must be exercised within a period of at least 30 days following the publication of notice of the issuance of shares or securities convertible into ourOi’s shares. Holders of our ADSs may not be able to exercise the preemptive rights relating to ourOi’s shares underlying their ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We areOi is not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the shares relating to these preemptive rights or to take any other action to make preemptive rights available to holders of our ADSs, and we mayOi is not required to file any such registration statement.

Redemption, Amortization, Tender Offers and Rights of Withdrawal

Our Oi’sby-laws or ourOi’s shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting may authorize usOi to use ourits profits or reserves to redeem or amortize ourOi’s shares in accordance with conditions and procedures established for such redemption or amortization. The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law defines “redemption” (resgate de ações) as the payment of the value of the shares in order to permanently remove such shares from circulation, with or without a corresponding reduction of ourOi’s share capital. The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law defines “amortization” (amortização) as the distribution to the shareholders, without a corresponding capital reduction, of amounts that they would otherwise receive if weOi were liquidated. If an amortization distribution has been paid prior to ourOi’s liquidation, then upon ourOi’s liquidation, the shareholders who did not receive an amortization distribution will have a preference equal to the amount of the amortization distribution in the distribution of ourOi’s capital.

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law authorizes ourOi’s shareholders to approve in a shareholders’ meeting the redemption of ourOi’s shares not held by ourOi’s controlling shareholders, if any, if after a tender offer effected for the purpose of delisting usOi as a publicly held company, ourOi’s controlling shareholders, if any, increase their participation

in ourOi’s total share capital to more than 95%. The redemption price in such case would be the same price paid for ourOi’s shares in any such tender offer.

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and our Oi’sby-laws also require the acquirer of control (in case of a change of control) or the controller (in case of delisting or a substantial reduction in liquidity of ourOi’s shares) to make a tender offer for the acquisition of the shares held by minority shareholders under certain circumstances described below under “—Mandatory Tender Offers.” The shareholder can also withdraw its capital from our companyOi under certain circumstances described below under “—Rights of Withdrawal.”

Mandatory Tender Offers

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law requires that if our common sharesthe Common Shares are delisted from the BM&FBOVESPAB3 or there is a substantial reduction in liquidity of our common shares,the Common Shares, as defined by the CVM, in each case as a result of purchases by ourOi’s controlling shareholders, ourOi’s controlling shareholders must effect a tender offer for acquisition of ourthe remaining common sharesCommon Shares at a purchase price equal to the fair value of our common sharesthe Common Shares taking into account the total number of our outstanding common shares.Common Shares. Oi’sby-laws require the cancellation of Oi’s registration as a public company with the CVM or Oi’s delisting from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 be preceded by a public tender offer for acquisition of the all of the capital stock of Oi based on a fair market valuation of Oi’s capital stock, in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law and the regulations issued by the CVM. The requirement to conduct a mandatory tender offer preceding Oi’s delisting from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 may be avoided if Oi instead joins theNovo Mercadoor Level 2 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 or, certain conditions being met, in the case of a voluntary withdrawal from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3.

If our controlling shareholders enter into aOi’sby-laws require that any transaction whichor series of transactions that results in a change of control of our company, the controlling shareholders must include in the documentation of the transaction an obligation to effectOi be preceded by a public offer for the purchase of all our common shares forof Oi’s capital stock by the same price per share paidprospective purchaser in order to ensure the controlling shareholders. The tender offer must be submitted toequitable treatment of all of Oi’s shareholders, in accordance with the CVM within 30 days fromrules of the date of executionNovo Mercadosegment of the documents that provide for the change of control.B3.

Rights of Withdrawal

The Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law provides that, in certain limited circumstances, a dissenting shareholder may withdraw its equity interest from our companyOi and be reimbursed by usOi for the value of our commonthe Common Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares that it then holds.

This right of withdrawal may be exercised by the dissenting ornon-voting holders (including any holder of preferred shares)Preferred Shares) in the event that the holders of a majority of all outstanding common sharesCommon Shares authorize:

 

a reduction of the mandatory dividend set forth in our Oi’sby-laws;

to create Preferred Shares or to increase the existing classes of Preferred Shares, without maintaining the proportion with the remaining classes of Preferred Shares, except if provided for and authorized in theby-laws, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

our

changes in the preferences, advantages and conditions of redemption or amortization of one or more classes of Preferred Shares, or the creation of a new class with greater privileges, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies;

 

to merge into another company or to consolidate with another company, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

a change in ourOi’s corporate purpose;

 

spinning-off

spinning off of all or any part of our company,Oi, if suchspin-off implies results in (1) a change in ourOi’s business purpose (except if thespun-off assets revert to a company whose main purpose is the same as ours)Oi’s), (2) a reduction of the mandatory dividend set forth in our Oi’sby-laws, or (3) ourOi’s participation in a centralized group of companies; or

 

in one of the following transactions in which the shares held by such holders do not meet liquidity and dispersion thresholds under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law:

the merger of our company with another company, or the consolidation of our company, in a transaction in which our company is not the surviving entity;

 

 

the transfermerger of all of our outstanding shares toOi with another company, or the consolidation of Oi, in anincorporação de ações transaction;a transaction in which Oi is not the surviving entity;

 

 

the transfer of all of the outstanding shares of another company to usOi in anincorporação de ações transaction; or

the acquisition of control of another company at a price that exceeds certain limits set forth in the Brazilian Corporation Law.

Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies.

Dissenting ornon-voting shareholders are also entitled to withdraw in the event that the entity resulting from a merger orspin-off does not have its shares listed in an exchange or traded in the secondary market within 120 days from the shareholders’ meeting that approved the relevant merger orspin-off.

Notwithstanding the above, in the event that we areOi is consolidated or merged with another company, becomebecomes part of a centralized group of companies, or acquireacquires the control of another company for a price in excess of certain limits imposed by the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, holders of any type or class of ourOi’s shares or the shares of the resulting entity that have minimal market liquidity and are dispersed among a sufficient number of shareholders will not have the right to withdraw. For this purpose, shares that are part of the IBOVESPAIbovespa index are considered liquid, and sufficient dispersion will exist if the controlling shareholder, the parent company or other companies under its control hold less than half of the total number of outstanding shares of that type or class. In case of aspin-off, the right of withdrawal will only exist if (1) there is a change in the corporate purpose, (2) there is a reduction in the mandatory dividend, or (3) thespin-off results in ourOi’s participation in a centralized group of companies.

Only shareholders who own shares on the date of publication of the first notice convening the relevant shareholders’ meeting or the material fact notice concerning the relevant transaction is published, whichever is earlier, will be entitled to withdrawal rights. Shareholders will only be entitled to exercise withdrawal rights with respect to the shares held by them from such date until the date withdrawal rights are exercised.

The redemption of shares arising out of the exercise of any withdrawal rights would be made at the book value of the shares, determined on the basis of ourOi’s most recent audited balance sheet approved by ourOi’s shareholders. If the shareholders’ meeting approving the action that gave rise to withdrawal rights occurred more than 60 days after the date of the most recent approved audited balance sheet, a shareholder may demand that its shares be valued on the basis of a balance sheet prepared specifically for this purpose.

The right of withdrawal lapses 30 days after the date of publication of the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the action that gave rise to withdrawal rights, except when the resolution is approved pending confirmation by the holders of our preferred sharesPreferred Shares (such confirmation to be given at an extraordinary meeting of such preferred shareholdersholders of Preferred Shares to be held within one year). In this event, the30-day period for dissenting shareholders begins at the date of publication of the minutes of the extraordinary meeting of such preferred shareholders. Ourholders of Preferred Shares. Oi’s shareholders may reconsider any resolution giving rise to withdrawal rights within 10 days after the expiration of the exercise period of withdrawal rights if ourOi’s management believes that the withdrawal of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize ourOi’s financial stability.

Liability of OurOi’s Shareholders for Further Capital Calls

Neither Brazilian law nor our Oi’sby-laws require any capital calls. OurOi’s shareholders’ liability for capital calls is limited to the payment of the issue price of any shares subscribed or acquired.

Inspection of Corporate Records

Shareholders that own 5% or more of ourOi’s outstanding share capital have the right to inspect ourOi’s corporate records, including shareholders’ lists, corporate minutes, financial records and other documents of our company,Oi, if (1) weOi or any of ourits officers or directors have committed any act contrary to Brazilian law or our Oi’sby-laws, or (2) there are grounds to suspect that there are material irregularities in our company.Oi. However, in either case, the shareholder that desires to inspect ourOi’s corporate records must obtain a court order authorizing the inspection.

Disclosures of Share Ownership

Brazilian regulations require that (1) each of ourOi’s direct or indirect controlling shareholders, if any, and (2) any person or group of persons representing a person that has directly or indirectly acquired or sold an interest that would result in an increase or decrease corresponding to 5%, or any 5% multiple thereof, of the total number of our

Oi’s shares of any type or class to disclose its or their share ownership or divestment to us,Oi, and we areOi is responsible for transmitting such information to the CVM and the market. In addition, if a share acquisition results in, or is made with the intention of, change of control or company’s management structure, as well as acquisitions that cause the obligation of performing a tender offer, the persons acquiring such number of shares are required to publish a statement containing certain required information about such acquisition.

OurOi’s controlling shareholders, if any, members of ourOi’s board of directors, board of executive officers, fiscal council and members of other bodies created pursuant to our Oi’sby-laws with technical or consulting functions must file a statement of any change in their holdings of ourOi’s shares with the CVM and the Brazilian stock exchanges on which ourOi’s securities are traded. WeOi also must disclose any trading of ourits shares by usOi or ourOi’s controlled or related companies.

Form and Transfer

Our preferred sharesCommon Shares and common sharesPreferred Shares are in book-entry form, registered in the name of each shareholder or its nominee. The transfer of ourOi’s shares is governed by Article 35 of the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by ourOi’s transfer agent, Banco do Brasil S.A., by an entry made by the transfer agent in its books, upon presentation of valid written share transfer instructions to usOi by a transferor or its representative. When preferred sharesCommon Shares or common sharesPreferred Shares are acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock exchange, the transfer is effected on the records of ourOi’s transfer agent by a representative of a brokerage firm or the stock exchange’s clearing system. The transfer agent also performs all the services of safe-keeping of ourOi’s shares. Provided that the provisions of Resolution No. 4,373 are observed, transfers of ourOi’s shares by anon-Brazilian investor are made in the same manner and are executed on the investor’s behalf by the investor’s local agent. If the original investment was registered with the Brazilian Central Bank pursuant to foreign investment regulations, thenon-Brazilian investor is also required to amend, if necessary, through its local agent, the electronic certificate of registration to reflect the new ownership.

The BM&FBOVESPAB3 operates a central clearing system, the CSD. A holder of ourOi’s shares may choose, at its discretion, to participate in this system, and all shares that such shareholder elects to be put into the clearing system are deposited in custody with the CSD (through a Brazilian institution that is duly authorized to operate by the Brazilian Central Bank and maintains a clearing account with the CSD). Shares subject to the custody of the CSD are noted as such in ourOi’s registry of shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn, be registered in the register of the CSD and will be treated in the same manner as shareholders registered in ourOi’s books.

Material Contracts

We have not entered into any material contracts, other than those described in this annual report or entered into in the ordinary course of business.

Exchange Controls

There are no restrictions on ownership or voting of ourOi’s capital stock by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend payments, payments of interest on shareholders’ equity and proceeds from the sale of ourOi’s share capital into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to exchange control restrictions under foreign investment legislation and foreign exchange regulations, which generally require, among other things, the registration of the relevant investment with the Brazilian Central Bank and/or the CVM, as the case may be.

Investments in our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares by (1) a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax purposes (including a non-Brazilian holder)Non-Brazilian Holder who is registered with the CVM under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, or (2) the depositary, are eligible for registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. This registration (the amount so registered is referred to as registered capital) allows the remittance outside Brazil of foreign currency, converted at the commercial market rate, acquired with the proceeds of distributions on, and amounts realized through, dispositions of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares.Preferred Shares.

The registered capital per newly issued common shareCommon Share or preferred sharePreferred Share purchased in the form of an ADS, or purchased in Brazil under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 and deposited with the depositary in exchange for an ADS, will be equal to its purchase price and to the market value of the corresponding shares on the date of the deposit, respectively.

The registered capital under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 per common shareCommon Share or preferred sharePreferred Share withdrawn upon cancellation of a corresponding ADS will be the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market value of the commonCommon Share or preferred share,Preferred Share, as the case may be, on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 on the day of withdrawal. Such cancellation is also subject to the execution of simultaneous foreign exchange agreements without the actual inflow and outflow of funds to and from Brazil, or the Symbolic FX Agreements. The U.S. dollar equivalent will be determined upon the execution of the Symbolic FX Agreement.

Foreign Direct Investment and Portfolio Investment

Investors (individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities) domiciled, residing or headquartered outside Brazil may register their investments in ourOi’s shares as foreign portfolio investments under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 (described below) or as foreign direct investments under Law No. 4,131 (described below). Registration under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or Law No. 4,131 generally enables the conversion of dividends, other distributions and sales proceeds received in connection with registered investments into foreign currency and the remittance of such amounts outside Brazil. Registration under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 affords favorable tax treatment tonon-Brazilian portfolio investors who are not resident in a favorable tax jurisdiction,Favorable Tax Jurisdiction, which is defined by Brazilian tax legislation as any country or location that: (1) does not tax income, or taxes income at a rate lower than 20% (or 17% in the case of countries or regimes abiding by the international policy for tax transparency); or (2) does not disclose or imposes restrictions on the disclosure of certain information concerning the shareholding composition of a legal entity, its ownership or the effective beneficiary of income attributable to the foreigners. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373

All investments made by anon-Brazilian investor under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 are subject to an electronic registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. This registration permits the conversion of dividend payments, payments of interest on shareholders’ equity and proceeds from the sale of ourOi’s share capital into foreign currency and the remission of such amounts outside Brazil.

Under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373,non-Brazilian investors registered with the CVM may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions available to Brazilian investors in the Brazilian financial and capital markets without obtaining a separate Brazilian Central Bank registration for each transaction, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. Under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, the definition of anon-Brazilian investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities domiciled or headquartered outside Brazil.

Pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373,non-Brazilian investors must:

 

appoint at least one representative in Brazil with powers to take action relating to its investments, which must be a financial institution duly authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank;

 

appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for its investments, which must be an institution duly authorized by the CVM;

 

complete the appropriate foreign investor registration forms;

 

appoint a tax representative in Brazil;

 

through its representative, register as anon-Brazilian investor with the CVM;

 

through its representative, register its investments with the Brazilian Central Bank; and

obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian federal tax authorities.

The securities and other financial assets held by anon-Brazilian investor pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Brazilian Central Bank or the CVM, as applicable, or be registered in registration, clearing and custody systems authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank or by the CVM, as applicable. Subject to limited exceptions provided in the CVM regulation or previous CVM authorization, the trading of securities held under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 is restricted to transactions carried out on stock exchanges or through organizedover-the-counter markets licensed by the CVM.

The offshore transfer or assignment of the securities or other financial assets held bynon-Brazilian investors pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 are prohibited, except for transfers (1) resulting from consolidation,spin-off, merger or merger of shares or occurring upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will; or (2) resulting from a corporate reorganization effected abroad, as long as the final beneficiaries and the amount of the assets remain the same.same, or (3) authorized by the CVM.

Law 4,131

To obtain a certificate of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank under Law No. 4,131, a foreign direct investor must:

register as a foreign direct investor with the Brazilian Central Bank;

obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;

appoint a tax representative in Brazil; and

appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on the Brazilian Corporation Law.

Foreign direct investors under Law No. 4,131 may sell their shares in either private or open market transactions, but these investors will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to our common or preferred shares. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

ADS - Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 – ADSs

Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 of the National Monetary Council provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. The Common and Preferred ADS program was approved by the Brazilian Central Bank and the CVM prior to the issuance of the Common ADSs. Accordingly, as a general rule, the proceeds from the sale of Common ADSs bynon-Brazilian resident holders of Common ADSs outside Brazil are not subject to Brazilian foreign investment controls, and Preferredholders of Common ADSs who are not domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction are entitled to favorable tax treatment. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains.”

Oi pays dividends and other cash distributions with respect to the Common Shares inreais. Oi has obtained electronic certificates of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank in the name of the depositary of the Common ADS program to be maintained by the custodian of the Common ADS program. Pursuant to this registration, the ADS Custodian is able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to Common Shares represented by Common ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside Brazil to the depositary of the Common ADS program so that the depositary of the Common ADS program may distribute these proceeds to the holders of record of the Common ADSs.

In the event that a holder of Common or Preferred ADSs exchanges those Common or Preferred ADSs for the underlying common shares or preferred shares, respectively,Common Shares, the holder must:

 

convert its investment in those shares into a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, subject to the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements; or

 

convert its investment in those shares into a direct foreign investment under Law No. 4,131, subject to the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements.

The custodian of the Common ADS program is authorized to update the electronic registration of the depositary of the Common and Preferred ADS Depositaryprogram to reflect conversions of Common and Preferred ADSs into foreign portfolio investments under Resolution No. 4,373.

If a holder of Common or Preferred ADSs elects to convert its Common and Preferred ADSs as the case may be, into a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or into a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131, the conversion will be effected before the Brazilian Central Bank by the custodian after receipt of an electronic request from the depositary with details of the transaction. If a foreign direct investor under Law No. 4,131 elects to deposit its Common Shares into the Common ADS program in exchange for Common ADSs, such holder will be required to present to the ADS Custodian evidence of payment of capital gains taxes and of the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for details of the tax consequences to an investor residing outside Brazil of investing in Common Shares or Preferred Shares in Brazil.

If a holder of Common ADSs wishes to convert its investment in our sharesCommon Shares into either a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131, it should begin the process of obtaining its own foreign investor registration with the Brazilian Central Bank or with the CVM, as the case may be, in advance of exchanging the Common or Preferred ADSs for the underlying common or preferred shares, respectively.Common Shares. A non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder of common or preferred sharesCommon Shares may experience delays in obtaining a foreign investor registration, which may delay remittances outside Brazil, which may in turn adversely affect the amount, in U.S. dollars, received by the non-Brazilian holder.Non-Brazilian Holder.

Unless the holder has registered its investment with the Brazilian Central Bank, the holder may not be able to convert the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such preferred shares (or the common shares into which such holder converts such preferred shares)Common Shares into foreign currency or remit those proceeds outside Brazil. In addition, if thenon-Brazilian investor residesis domiciled in a “tax haven” jurisdictionFavorable Tax Jurisdiction or is not an investor registered under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, the investor will be subject to less favorable tax treatment than a holder of Common ADSs. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Law 4,131

To obtain a certificate of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank under Law No. 4,131, a foreign direct investor must:

register as a foreign direct investor with the Brazilian Central Bank;

obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;

appoint a tax representative in Brazil; and

appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on the Brazilian Corporate Law.

Foreign direct investors under Law No. 4,131 may sell their shares in either private or open market transactions, but these investors will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to Common Shares. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Taxation

The following discussion contains a description of the material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, hold or dispose of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. This discussion is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and the United States and regulations under these tax laws as currently in effect, which are subject to change.

Although there is at present no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate in such a treaty. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Prospective purchasers of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.

Brazilian Tax Considerations

The following discussion contains a description of the material Brazilian tax consequences, subject to the limitations set forth herein, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder.holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes (a“Non-Brazilian Holder”). This discussion is based on the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder in effect on the date hereof, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion does not specifically address all of the Brazilian tax considerations that may be applicable to any particular non-Brazilian holder.Non-Brazilian Holder. Therefore, each non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder should consult its own tax advisor about the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Individuals domiciled in Brazil and Brazilian companies are taxed in Brazil on the basis of their worldwide income which includes earnings of Brazilian companies’ foreign subsidiaries, branches and affiliates. The earnings of branches of foreign companies andnon-Brazilian residents, or nonresidents, in general are taxed in Brazil only on income derived from Brazilian sources.

Pursuant to Brazilian law, thenon-resident holder may invest in Common Shares or Preferred Shares under Resolution 4,373, of September 2014, of the National Monetary Council (a “4,373 Holder”).

Dividends

DividendsAs of the date of this annual report, dividends paid by a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, in cash or in kind, including stock dividends and other dividends paid to a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are currently not subject to withholding income tax withholding in Brazil to the extent that such amounts are related to profits generated after January 1, 1996. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax withholding at

varying rates, according to the tax legislation applicable to each corresponding year. See “—New

Law No. 11,638, dated December 28, 2007, significantly modified Brazilian Corporate Law in order to align the generally accepted Brazilian accounting standards to the IFRS. Nonetheless, Law No. 11,941, dated May 27, 2009, introduced the Transitory Tax Regime Created(regime tributário de transição – “RTT”), in order to render neutral, from a tax perspective, all changes provided by Law No. 12,973”11,638. Under the RTT, Brazilian companies, for further information regardingtax purposes, should observe the accounting rules and criteria as in force on December 31, 2007.

Profits determined pursuant to Law 11,638(“IFRS Profits”), may differ from the profits calculated pursuant to the accounting methods and criteria as effective on December 31, 2007 (“2007 Profits”).

While it was general market practice to distribute exempted dividends with reference to the IFRS Profits, Normative Ruling No. 1,397, issued by the Brazilian tax authorities on September 16, 2013, has established that legal entities should observe the accounting methods and criteria in force on December 31, 2007, or 2007 Profits, in order to determine the amount of profits that could be distributed as exempted income to its beneficiaries.

Any profits paid in excess of said 2007 Profits (“Excess Dividends”), should, in the tax authorities’ view, and in the specific case ofnon-resident beneficiaries, be subject to the following rules of taxation: (1) 15% WHT, in case of beneficiaries domiciled abroad, but not in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction (as defined below), and (2) 25% WHT, in the case of beneficiaries domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction (as defined below).

In order to mitigate potential disputes on the subject, Law No. 12,973, dated May 13, 2014, in addition to revoking the RTT, introduced a new set of tax rules (“the New Brazilian Tax Regime”), including new provisions with respect to Excess Dividends. Under these new provisions: (1) Excess Dividends related to profits assessed from 2008 to 2013 are exempt; (2) potential disputes remain concerning the Excess Dividends related to 2014 profits, unless our company had voluntarily elected to apply the New Brazilian Tax Regime in 2014; and (3) as of 2015, as the New Brazilian Tax Regime is mandatory and has completely replaced the RTT, dividends calculated based on the 2014 calendar-year profits.IFRS standards should be considered fully exempt.

Interest on Shareholders’ Equity

Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, allows a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, to make distributions to shareholders of interest on shareholders’ equity on top of or as an alternative to making dividend distributions, and treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax, and, since 1998, social contribution on net profit as well, as long as the limits described below are observed.observed and the payment is approved at a general meeting of shareholders. These distributions may be paid in cash. For tax purposes, the deductible amount of thissuch interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation ofare calculated by multiplying the TJLP, as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank from time to time, andby the sum of determined Brazilian company’s net equity accounts. The amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:

 

50% of net income (after the deduction of social contribution on net profit but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; and

 

50% of the sum of retained profits and incomeprofits reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made.

Payment of interest on shareholders’ equity to a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder is subject to withholding income tax withholding at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder is domiciled in a country or location that is considered to be a “tax haven jurisdiction” for this purpose. For this purpose, the definition of “tax haven” encompasses countries and locations (1) that do not impose income tax, (2) that impose income tax at a rate of 20% or less, or (3) where local laws do not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed to non-residents.Favorable Tax Jurisdiction.

On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian Revenue Service issued Rule No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a “tax favorable jurisdiction” from 20% to 17%. Please refer to “—Discussion on Definition of ‘Tax Haven’ Jurisdictions” below for a discussion that the definition of “tax haven” jurisdiction may be broadened by an interpretation of Law No. 11,727. These payments of interest on shareholders’ equity may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent payment of interest on net equity is so included, Oi is required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable withholding income tax, withholding,plus the amount of declared dividends, is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.

Payments of interest on shareholders’ equity are decided by Oi’s shareholders, at its annual shareholders meeting, on the basis of recommendations of its board of directors. No assurance can be given that ourOi’s board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of profits should be made by means of interest on shareholders’ equity instead of by means of dividends.

There

Discussion on Definition of Favorable Tax Jurisdiction

Under Brazilian tax law, a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction is defined as a country or location that (a) does not impose taxation on income, or (b) imposes the income tax at a maximum rate lower than 20%, or (c) local legislation does not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are ongoing discussionsattributed to non-resident. Please note that the statutory definition of a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction for the purpose of income taxation on gains should differ depending on whether or not the holder is a 4,373 Holder. In the case of a 4,373 Holder, the definition of Favorable Tax Jurisdiction should not comprise jurisdictions mentioned in Congressitem (c). However, the list of Favorable Tax Jurisdictions provided for in Normative Instruction No. 1,037/10 does not seem to differ the Favorable Tax Jurisdiction definition for the purposes of 4,373 Holders.

On June 23, 2008, Law No. 11,727 introduced the concept of Privileged Tax Regimes (“PTRs”), which encompasses the countries and jurisdictions that: (1) do not tax income or tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17% in certain cases as detailed below; (2) grant tax advantages to anon-resident entity or individual (a) without the need to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory or (b) conditioned on thenon-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory; (3) do not tax or taxes proceeds generated abroad or taxes such proceeds at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17% in certain cases as detailed below; or (4) restrict the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions carried out within its territory. Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10, as amended, also provided a list of the PTRs.

In the past, it was not clear whether the concept of PTR was also applicable to interest payments made to residents outside Brazil. Notwithstanding, in December 2017, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service published Ruling No. 575/2017, stating that only payments to countries deemed as Favorable Tax Jurisdictions by Normative Ruling No. 1,037 would be subject to withholding tax at a 25% rate. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that subsequent legislation or interpretations by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding possible changesthe definition of a PTR provided by Law No. 9,430, of December 27, 1996, altered by Law No. 11,727, will also apply to the tax treatmentaNon-Brazilian Holder on payments of interest on shareholders’ equity. There can be no assurance

Notwithstanding the above, we recommend that you consult your own tax advisors regarding the currentconsequences of the implementation of Law No. 11,727, Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 and of any related Brazilian tax treatment will continuelaw or regulation concerning Favorable Tax Jurisdictions or PTRs.

On November 28, 2014, the Ministry of Treasury issued Ordinance No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction and PTRs from 20% to 17%. The reduced 17% threshold applies only to countries and regimes aligned with international standards of fiscal transparency in accordance with rules to be availableestablished by the Brazilian tax authorities in Normative Ruling No. 1,530, dated December 19, 2014. Normative Ruling No. 1,530/14 provides that compliance with such standards requires: (1) signature or negotiations completion for a treaty or agreement allowing the future.exchange of information related to identification of income beneficiaries, shareholding structure, ownership of goods or rights, or economic transactions that are carried out; and (2) commitment to the criteria set out in internationalanti-tax evasion forums of which Brazil is a member, such as the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information. Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 is regularly updated by tax authorities.

Taxation of Gains

Under Law No. 10,833, enacted on December 29, 2003, the gain on the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by a non-Brazilian holder,Non-Brazilian Holder, whether to anothernon-Brazilian resident or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to withholding income tax on capital gain taxesgains in Brazil.

With respect to the disposition of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares,Preferred Shares, as they are assets located in Brazil, the non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder should be subject to withholding income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described below, regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or with a Brazilian resident.

With respect to ourOi’s ADSs, although the matter is not entirely clear, arguably the gains realized by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder upon the disposition of ADSs to another non-Brazilian resident will not be taxed in Brazil, on the

basis that ADSs are not “assets located in Brazil” for the purposes of Law No. 10,833. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation.interpretation, considering the general and unclear scope of Law No. 10,833 and the absence of judicial guidance in respect thereof. As a result, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder to a Brazilian resident, or even to anon-Brazilian resident, in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil, may be subject to income tax in Brazil according to the rules applicable to our common sharesCommon Shares and preferred shares,Preferred Shares, described above.below.

As a general rule, gains realized as a result of a disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are the positive difference between the amount realized on the transaction and the acquisition cost of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Under Brazilian law, however, income tax rules on such gains can vary depending on the domicile of the non-Brazilian holder,Non-Brazilian Holder, the type of registration of the investment by the non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder with the Brazilian Central Bank and how the disposition is carried out, as described below.

Gains realized on a disposition of shares carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the organizedover-the-counter market) are:

 

exempt from income tax when realized by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder that (1) has registered its investment in Brazil with the Brazilian Central Bank under the rules of Resolution No.is a 4,373 dated September 14, 2014, which replaced Resolution 2,689 dated January 26, 2000 (“4,373 Holder”),Holder, and (2) is not a resident in a country or location which is defined as a “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purposesFavorable Tax Jurisdiction (as described below)above); or

 

subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in any other case, including a case of gains assessed by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder that is not a 4,373 Holder and is a resident of a country or location defined as a “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purposeFavorable Tax Jurisdiction (as described below)above). In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% of the sale value will be applicable and can be later offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. This 0.005% withholding income tax is not levied on day trade transactions.transactions, which are subject to a rate of 1%.

Any other gains assessed on a disposition of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares that is not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange are subject to withholding income tax at thea rate of 15%, orup to 25% in the case of a non-Brazilian holder which resides in a “tax haven” jurisdiction according to the definition applicable to this situation.. In the case that these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Braziliannon-organizedover-the-counter market with intermediation, income tax withholding of 0.005% will also be applicable and can be offset against the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. This 0.005% income tax withholding is not levied in day trade transactions.

In the case of 4,373 Holders, a country or location should only be defined as a “tax haven” jurisdiction when it (1) does not tax income, or (2) taxes income at a rate of 20% or less. In the case of gains realized by non-Brazilian holders other than 4,373 Holders, a country or location should be defined as a “tax haven” jurisdiction when it (a) does not tax income, (b) taxes income at a rate of 20% or less, or (c) where local laws do not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed to non-residents. See “—Discussion on Definition of ‘Tax Haven’ Jurisdictions” for more information on this maximum rate of 20% and its reduction to 17%.

In the case of redemption of securitiesCommon Shares or Preferred Shares or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, the positive difference between the amount effectively received by the non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder and the correspondingproportional acquisition cost of the redeemed assets is treated, for tax purposes, as capital gain derived from sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market, and is therefore subject to withholding income tax at the raterates of 15% orup to 25%, as the case may be.

The deposit of ourOi’s common or preferred shares in exchange for ADSs willmay be subject to Brazilian income tax on capital gains at the rate up to 25%, if the acquisition cost of the shares is lower than (1) the average price per share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of deposit, or (2) if no shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In such case, the difference between the acquisition cost and the average price of the shares calculated as above will be considered to be a capital gain subject to income tax withholding at the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be.gain. In some circumstances, there may be arguments to claim

that this taxation is not applicable in the case of a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder that is a 4,373 Holder and is not a resident in a “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purpose.Favorable Tax Jurisdiction. The availability of these arguments to any specific holder of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares will depend on the circumstances of such holder. Prospective holders of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the deposit of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares in exchange for ADSs.

The withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for the underlying Common Shares or Preferred Shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax, as far as the regulatory rules in respect to the registration of the investment before the Brazilian Central Bank are duly observed.

Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the sale or disposition or assignment of preemptive rights relating to our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares,Preferred Shares, including the sale or assignment carried out by the depositary, on behalf of non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holders of ADSs, will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares.

As a non-Brazilian holder of ADSs, youPreferred Shares (see above). Tax authorities may cancel your TmarPart ADSs and exchange them for TmarPart shares. Incomeattempt to tax will not be levied on such exchange, as long as the appropriate rules are complied with in connection with the registration of the investment with the Central Bank, and as long as ADSs are not deemed to be “assets located in Brazil.”

Any gain earned by a non-Brazilian holder on the exercise of appraisal rights (which consists of a disposition of Oi shares, in exchange for a cash payment by Oi) will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of shares of TmarPart.

Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the subscription of new TmarPart shares or ADSs, upon a capital increase of TmarPart, will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on thegains even when sale or assignment of preemptivesuch rights relating to shares of TmarPart, including the sale or assignment carried out by the TmarPart Depositary, on behalf of non-Brazilian holders of ADSs, will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of shares of TmarPart. The current preferential tax treatment for 4,373 Holders, as described above, may be extinguished in the future.

On March 16, 2016, Provisional Measure No. 692 was converted into Law 13,259/16 and increased tax rates on capital gains earned by Brazilian individuals and certain legal entities. The new rates should apply as from 2017 as follows: (i) 15%takes place outside Brazil, based on the capital gain not exceeding R$5,000,000; (ii) 17.5% on the capital gain amount between R$5,000,000 and R$10,000,000; (iii) 20% on the capital gain amount between R$10,000,000 and R$30,000,000; and (iv) 22.5% on the capital gain which exceeds R$30,000,000. The new rates should also apply to non-Brazilian holders depending on their type of investment, jurisdiction and the sale transaction, subject to confirmation on a case by case basis.

Discussion on Definition of “Tax Haven” Jurisdictions

Until December 2008, under Brazilian tax laws, a Low Tax Jurisdiction (“LTJ”) was defined as a country or location that does not impose taxation on income, or imposes the income tax at a rate lower than 20%. There was also the concept of Tax Favorable Jurisdiction (“TFJ”) which also included the jurisdictions where local laws do not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed to non-resident. There was a list of TFJs enacted by Brazilian tax authorities by means of Normative Instruction No. 188/2002.

On June 24, 2008, Law No. 11,727 introduced the concept of Privileged Tax Regimes (“PTRs”), which encompasses the countries and jurisdictions that: (i) do not tax income or tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20%; (ii) grant tax advantages to a non-resident entity or individual (a) without the need to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory or (b) conditioned on the non-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory; (iii) do not tax or taxes proceeds generated abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20.0%; or (iv) restrict the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions carried out.

As a consequence, in 2010, a new list was enacted by Brazilian tax authorities, via Normative Instruction 1,037/10 (“NI 1,037/10”), which includes the countries considered as TFJs and the locations considered as granting

PTRs. Under Section 2 of NI 1,037/10, companies incorporated as LLCs in the US, and companies benefiting from some holding regimes in Europe, may be considered as granting PTRs. We highlight that there would be solid legal grounds to sustain that the list should be interpreted as an exhaustive list, so that only the countries and locations listed should be viewed as TFJs and PTRs, according to their specific qualification. The interpretation of the current Brazilian tax legislation should lead to the conclusion that the concept of PTR should only apply for certain Brazilian tax purposes, such as transfer pricing and thin capitalization. According to this interpretation, the concept of PTR should not be applied in connection with the taxation of dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity and gains related to investments made by non-Brazilian holders in Brazilian corporations, such as TmarPart. Regulations and non-binding tax rulings issued by Brazilian federal tax authorities seem to confirm this interpretation.

Notwithstanding the above, we recommend that you consult your own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the implementationprovisions of Law No. 11,727, NI 1,037/10 and of any related Brazilian10,833/03.

There can be no assurance that the current favorable tax law or regulation concerning LTJs, TFJs, or PTRs.

On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian Revenue Service issued Rule No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a TFJ from 20%treatment to 17%. This rule also applies for purposes of the definition of PTRs. In any event, differing interpretations by the tax authorities4,373 Holders will continue in the application of this rule may result in a lower number of jurisdictions being characterized as TFJ. Furthermore, the RFB issued Normative Instruction No. 1,530/14 providing that compliance with such standards requires: (a) signature or negotiations completion for a treaty or agreement allowing the exchange of information related to identification of income beneficiaries, shareholding structure, ownership of goods or rights, or economic transactions that are carried out; and (b) commitment to the criteria set out in international anti-tax evasion forums of which Brazil is a member. A new list of TFJs and PTRs has not been issued to date.future.

Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions (IOF/Exchange Tax)

Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions, or IOF/Exchange Tax, on the conversion ofreais into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency into reais.reais. The currently applicable rate for most types of foreign exchange transactions is 0.38%. However, other rates apply to specific types of transactions.

Any inflow of funds related to investments carried out on the Brazilian financial and capital markets by a 4,373 Holders is currently subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero percent. Foreign exchange transactions related to outflows of funds in connection with investments carried out on the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero percent.

The IOF/Exchange Tax also levies at a zero percent rate in case of dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity paid by a Brazilian corporation such as TmarPart, to non-Brazilian holders.Non-Brazilian Holders.

The Brazilian government is permitted to increase the rate of the IOF/Exchange Tax at any time by up to 25% on the foreign exchange transaction amount. However, any increase in rates will only apply to transactions carried out after such increase in rates enters into force.

The purchase of ADSs by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder outside Brazil generally does not require the execution of a foreign exchange agreement with the Brazilian Central Bank. If this is the case, the IOF/Exchange Tax is not due. The IOF/Exchange Tax is levied at a zero percent rate in connection with foreign exchange agreements, without any actual flows of funds, thatwhich are required for a cancellation of ADSs and exchange for shares traded on a Brazilian stock exchange.

Tax on Transactions Involving Securities (IOF/ Securities Tax)

Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and Securities, or IOF/Bonds and Securities, due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange.exchange, futures and commodities exchanges.

The rate of IOF/Bonds and Securities applicable to most transactions involving shares and ADSs is currently zero, although the Brazilian government may increase such rate at any time up to 1.5% of the transaction amount per day, but only in respect of future transactions.

The transfer (cessão) of shares traded on a Brazilian stock exchange for the issuance of depositary receipts to be traded outside Brazil, such as ADSs, is currently subject to the IOF/Bonds and Securities at a zero percent rate.

New Tax Regime Created by Law No. 12,973

Normative Instruction No. 1,397/2013, or NI 1,397/2013, published in the Official Gazette on September 17, 2013, was enacted to regulate the transitional tax regime, or RTT, in force between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014, to adjust, for tax purposes, the net profit calculated under the IFRS rules in accordance with Law 11,638/2007. According to NI 1,397/2013, for purposes of calculating dividends and interest on net equity, taxpayers must use the accounting books prepared according to the criteria in force on December 31, 2007, and not IFRS. According to such provisions, depending on the tax basis used by the taxpayer, certain dividend distributions may be subject to a 15% withholding tax (or 25% if the taxpayer resides in a “tax haven” jurisdiction).

Provisional Measure 627/2013 was converted into Law No. 12,973, enacted on May 13, 2014 (“Law 12,973/14”), which revoked the RTT and introduced a new tax regime, in line with the current Brazilian accounting standards (IFRS). According to Law 12,973/14, companies electing to be taxed under the new regime on January 1, 2014 as opposed to January 1, 2015 will not be subject to taxation under NI 1,397/2013 on their dividend distributions based on 2014 profits. Companies that did not elect to be taxed under the new regime on January 1, 2014, might be subject to withholding income tax on a part of the dividend distributions based on 2014 profits, according to the rules set forth under NI 1,397/2013.

Other Brazilian Taxes

There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holderNon-Brazilian Holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil.Brazil in the transfer of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs to residents of those states. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by non-Brazilian holdersNon-Brazilian Holders of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, of Oi, which are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs. This description addresses only the U.S. federal income tax considerations of U.S. Holders (as defined below) that are initial purchasers of the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi and that will hold such shares or ADSs as capital assets. This description does not address tax considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to special tax rules, such as banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, grantor trusts, regulated investment companies, dealers or traders in securities or currencies,tax-exempt entities, pension funds, persons that received the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi pursuant to an exercise of employee stock options or rights or otherwise as compensation for the performance of services, persons that will hold the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi as a position in a “straddle” or as a part of a “hedging,” “conversion” or other risk reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, persons that will own the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi through partnerships or other pass through entities, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States or holders that own (or are deemed to own) 10% or more (by combined voting power)power or combined value) of the shares of Oi.Oi’s shares.

This description does not address any state, local ornon-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi by U.S. Holders. Moreover, this description does not address the consequences of any U.S. federal tax other than income tax, including but not limited to the U.S. federal estate and gift taxes. This description is based on (1) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), existing and temporary U.S. Treasury Regulations and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in effect and available on the date of this annual report, as well as proposed Treasury Regulations available on the date of this annual report, and (2) in part, the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. All of the foregoing is subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine the particular tax

consequences to such holders of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, of Oi, including the applicability and effect of U.S. state, local andnon-U.S. tax laws.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means, for U.S. federal tax purposes, a beneficial owner of common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi that is:

 

an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

 

a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

a trust if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration, and (2) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust.

If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, of Oi, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partnership or its partners should consult their tax advisor as to its tax consequences.

Treatment of ADSs

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder of an ADR evidencing an ADS will be treated as the beneficial owner of the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares of OiPreferred Shares represented by the applicable ADS. The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concern that depositaries for ADSs, or other intermediaries between the holders of shares of an issuer and the issuer, may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of U.S. foreign tax credits by U.S. Holders of such receipts or shares. Such actions include, for example, apre-release of an ADS by a depositary. Accordingly, the analysis regarding the availability of a U.S. foreign tax credit for Brazilian taxes, the sourcing rules described below and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certainnon-corporate holders, each could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

A Non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (1) at least 75 percent of its gross income is “passive income,” or (2) at least 50 percent of the average value of its gross assets is attributable to assets that produce “passive income” or is held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. For purposes of the PFIC asset test, the aggregate fair market value of the assets of a publicly traded foreign corporation generally is treated as being equal to the sum of the aggregate value of the outstanding stock and the total amount of the liabilities of such corporation (the “Market Capitalization”).

Based on certain estimates of the gross income and gross assets of Oi, the nature of its business, the size of its investment in certain subsidiaries, and its anticipated Market Capitalization, Oi believes that it will be classified as a PFIC for its taxable year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, Oi believes there is a significant risk it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2016 and for future taxable years, unless the market price of Oi’s common shares or preferred shares significantly increases or Oi reduces the amount of cash and other passive assets it holds relative to the amount of non-passive assets it holds. The application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and Oi must make a separate determination after the close of each taxable year as to whether it was a PFIC for such year. Moreover, Oi has not obtained an opinion from counsel regarding the PFIC status of Oi for any taxable period.

If Oi is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, Oi generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for all succeeding years

during which such U.S. Holder holds common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, unless Oi ceases to be a PFIC and such U.S. Holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi. If such election is made, such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have sold such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi held by such U.S. Holder at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which Oi qualified as a PFIC, and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to the consequences described in the following paragraph. After the deemed sale election, such U.S. Holder’s common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi with respect to which the deemed sale election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC, and such U.S. Holder would not be subject to the rules described below with respect to any “excess distribution” such U.S. Holder receives from Oi or any gain from an actual sale or other disposition of such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, unless Oi subsequently becomes a PFIC.The rules dealing with deemed sale elections are complex. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisor as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election if Oi ceases to be treated as a PFIC and such election becomes available to U.S. Holders.

For each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, any excess distribution (generally a distribution in excess of 125% of the average distribution over a three-year period or shorter holding period for Oi’s common shares or preferred shares) and realized gain will be treated as ordinary income and will be subject to tax as if (1) the excess distribution or gain had been realized ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period, (2) the amount deemed realized in each year had been subject to tax in each such year at the highest marginal rate for such year (other than income allocated to the current period or any taxable period before Oi became a PFIC, which would be subject to tax at the U.S. Holder’s regular ordinary income rate for the current year and would not be subject to the interest charge discussed below), and (3) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax had been imposed on the taxes deemed to have been payable in those years. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of Oi being treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holders. The tax liability for amounts allocated to taxable years prior to the year of disposition or excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating losses for such years, and gains (but not losses) realized on the sale or other disposition of common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi cannot be treated as capital, even if a U.S. Holder holds the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi as capital assets. In addition, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi that are acquired from a decedent would not receive a step-up to fair market value as of the date of the decedent’s death but instead would be equal to the decedent’s basis, if lower.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year, to the extent any of Oi’s subsidiaries are also PFICs or Oi makes direct or indirect equity investments in other entities that are PFICs, such U.S. Holder may be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by Oi in that proportion which the value of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi such U.S. Holder owns bears to the value of all of Oi’s common shares, preferred shares and ADSs, and such U.S. Holder may be subject to the adverse tax consequences described in the preceding two paragraphs with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFICs that such U.S. Holder would be deemed to own. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of Oi’s subsidiaries.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, such U.S. Holder may be able to make certain elections that may alleviate certain of the tax consequences referred to above. Where a company that is a PFIC meets certain reporting requirements, a U.S. Holder can avoid certain adverse PFIC consequences described above by making a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, election to be taxed currently on its proportionate share of the PFIC’s ordinary income and net capital gains. However, Oi does not intend to comply with the necessary accounting and record keeping requirements that would allow a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election with respect to Oi.

If the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange,” a U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election with respect to the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, as the case may be. If a U.S. Holder makes the mark-to-market election, for each year in which Oi is a PFIC, the holder will generally include as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the common shares, preferred shares, or ADSs of Oi, as the case may be, at the end of the taxable year over their adjusted tax basis, and will be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the

election, the holder’s tax basis in the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, as the case may be, will be adjusted to reflect the amount of any such income or loss. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be treated as ordinary income. The common shares, preferred shares and ADSs of Oi will be considered “marketable stock” if they are traded on a qualified exchange, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. The NYSE is a qualified exchange and the BM&FBOVESPA may constitute a qualified exchange for this purpose provided the BM&FBOVESPA meets certain trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, surveillance and other requirements set forth in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. However, Oi cannot be certain that the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will continue to trade on the BM&FBOVESPA or the NYSE, respectively, or that the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be traded on at least 15 days in each calendar quarter in other than de minimis quantities. U.S. Holders should be aware, however, that for each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, the interest charge regime described above could be applied to indirect distributions or gains deemed to be attributable to such U.S. Holder in respect of any of Oi’s subsidiaries that also may be determined to be a PFIC, and the mark-to-market election generally would not be effective for such subsidiaries. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor to determine whether a mark-to-market election is available and the consequences of making an election if Oi were characterized as a PFIC.

If a U.S. Holder owns common shares, preferred shares, or ADSs of Oi during any year in which Oi was a PFIC, such U.S. Holder generally must file IRS Form 8621 with respect to Oi, generally with the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax return for that year.

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion below aboveunder “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” in general, the gross amount of a distribution made with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi (which for this purpose shall include distributions of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity before any reduction for any Brazilian taxes withheld therefrom) will, to the extent made from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute a dividend to a U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxed on dividends from a qualified foreign corporation at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., gains with respect to capital assets held for more than one year). A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares or ADSs that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. U.S. Treasury Department guidance indicates that the ADSs of Oi (which are listed on the NYSE), but not the common or preferred shares of Oi, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Thus, subject to the discussion abovebelow under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” as of the date of this annual report, dividends that Oi pays on the ADS, but not on the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares of Oi, currently meet the trading conditions discussed above required for these reduced tax rates. However, there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Furthermore, a U.S. Holder’s eligibility for such preferential rate is subject to certain holding period requirements and thenon-existence of certain risk reduction transactions with respect to the ADSs and such preferential rate is not available if Oi is a PFIC for the taxable year in which such dividend is paid or was a PFIC for the taxable year preceding the taxable year in which such dividend is paid. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders. Subject to the discussion abovebelow under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” if a distribution exceeds the amount of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, it will be treated as anon-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi on which it is paid and thereafter as capital gain. Oi does not maintain calculations of the earnings and profits of Oi under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that distributions by Oi generally will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Additionally, because Oi believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2018, distributions, if any, paid during the 2019 taxable year are not be eligible for the preferential tax rates discussed above.

A dividend paid inreais will be includible in the income of a U.S. Holder at its value in U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the prevailing spot market exchange rate in effect on the day it is received by the U.S. Holder in the case of the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares of OiPreferred Shares or, in the case of a dividend received in respect of ADSs of Oi, on the date the dividend is received by the depositary, whether or not the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars. Assuming the payment is not converted at that time, the U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in reais equal to that U.S. dollar amount, which will be used to measure gain or loss from subsequent changes in exchange rates. Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder that subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of reais, which gain or loss is attributable to currency fluctuations after the date of receipt of the dividend, will be ordinary gain or loss. The

amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.

The gross amount of any dividend paid (which will include any amounts withheld in respect of Brazilian taxes) with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as foreign source dividend income, which may be relevant in calculating a U.S. Holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, any Brazilian withholding tax will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for the U.S. foreign tax credit is calculated separately with respect to specific “baskets” of income. For this purpose, the dividends should generally constitute “passive category income,” or in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general category income.” The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Treatment of Preferred Stock

Section 305 of the Code provides special rules for the tax treatment of preferred stock. According to the U.S. Treasury Regulations under that section, the term preferred stock generally refers to stock which enjoys certain limited rights and privileges (generally associated with specified dividend and liquidation priorities) but does not participate in corporate growth to any significant extent. While Oi’s preferred sharesPreferred Shares have some preferences over its common shares,Common Shares, the preferred sharesPreferred Shares are not fixed as to dividend payments or liquidation value. Consequently, although the matter is not entirely clear, because the determination is highly factual in nature, it is more likely than not that the preferred shares of Oi will be treated as “common stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code. If the preferred shares are treated as “common stock” for purposes of section 305 of the Code, distributions to U.S. Holders of additional shares of such “common stock” or preemptive rights relating to such “common stock” with respect to their preferred shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders in most instances will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. On the other hand, if the preferred shares are treated as “preferred stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code, and if a U.S. Holder receives a distribution of additional shares or preemptive rights as described in the preceding sentence, such distributions (including amounts withheld in respect of any Brazilian taxes), as discussed more fully below, will be treated as dividends to the same extent and in the same manner as distributions payable in cash. In that event, the amount of such distribution (and the basis of the new shares or preemptive rights so received) will equal the fair market value of the shares or preemptive rights on the date of distribution.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi

A deposit or withdrawal of common shares or preferred shares by a U.S. Holder in exchange for the ADS that represent such shares will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi held by the U.S. Holder or the depositary, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in its common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi (determined in U.S. dollars) and the U.S. dollar amount realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other disposition of a share, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian tax. In the case of anon-corporate U.S. Holder, the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to capital gain generally will be lower than the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income (other than, as discussed above, certain dividends) if such holder’s holding period for such common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi exceeds one year (i.e., such gain is a long-term capital gain). Capital gain, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition or deposit of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi that is subject to Brazilian tax, the U.S. Holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian tax unless it can apply the credit against U.S. tax payable on other income from foreign sources in the appropriate income category, or, alternatively, it may take a deduction for the Brazilian tax if it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

The initial tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder, or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder, will determine the dollar value of the cost of such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. The conversion of U.S. dollars to reais and the immediate use of that currency to purchase common shares, preferred shares or ADSs generally will not result in taxable gain or loss for a U.S. Holder.

With respect to the sale or exchange of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on the date of disposition. If Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer, or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer, will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

Anon-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (1) at least 75 percent of its gross income is “passive income,” or (2) at least 50 percent of the average value of its gross assets is attributable to assets that produce “passive income” or is held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. For purposes of the PFIC asset test, the aggregate fair market value of the assets of a publicly traded foreign corporation generally is treated as being equal to the sum of the aggregate value of the outstanding stock and the total amount of the liabilities of such corporation (the “Market Capitalization”).

Based on certain estimates of the gross income and gross assets of Oi, the nature of its business, the size of its investment in certain subsidiaries, and its anticipated Market Capitalization, Oi believes that it was not classified as a PFIC for its taxable year ended December 31, 2019, although Oi believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2018. Nevertheless, because PFIC status is determined annually based on Oi’s income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether Oi will be characterized as a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2020, or for any subsequent year, until after the close of the year. Furthermore, because Oi determines the value of its gross assets based on the Market Capitalization test, a decline in the value of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares may result in Oi becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Oi will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. Moreover, Oi has not obtained an opinion from counsel regarding the PFIC status of Oi for any taxable period.

If Oi is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, Oi generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for all succeeding years during which such U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, unless Oi ceases to be a PFIC and such U.S. Holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. If such election is made, such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have sold such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs held by such U.S. Holder at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which Oi qualified as a PFIC, and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to the consequences described in the following paragraph. After the deemed sale election, such U.S. Holder’s Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs with respect to which the deemed sale election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC, and such U.S. Holder would not be subject to the rules described below with respect to any “excess distribution” such U.S. Holder receives from Oi or any gain from an actual sale or other disposition of such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, unless Oi subsequently becomes a PFIC.The rules dealing with deemed sale elections are complex. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisor as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election.

For each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, any excess distribution (generally a distribution in excess of 125% of the average distribution over a three-year period or shorter holding period for Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs) and realized gain will be treated as ordinary income and will be subject to tax as if (1) the excess distribution or gain had been realized ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period, (2) the amount deemed realized in each year had been subject to tax in each such year at the highest marginal rate for such year (other than income allocated to the current period or any taxable period before Oi became a PFIC, which would be subject to tax at the U.S. Holder’s regular ordinary income rate for the current year and would not be subject to the interest charge discussed below), and (3) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax had been imposed on the taxes deemed to have been payable in those years. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of Oi being treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holders. The tax liability for amounts allocated to taxable years prior to the year of disposition or excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating losses for such years, and gains (but not losses) realized on the sale or other disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs cannot be treated as capital, even if a U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs as capital assets. In addition, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs that are acquired from a decedent would not receive astep-up to fair market value as of the date of the decedent’s death but instead would be equal to the decedent’s basis, if lower.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year, to the extent any of Oi’s subsidiaries are also PFICs or Oi makes direct or indirect equity investments in other entities that are PFICs, such U.S. Holder may be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by Oi in that proportion which the value of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi such U.S. Holder owns bears to the value of all of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs, and such U.S. Holder may be subject to the adverse tax consequences described in the preceding two paragraphs with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFICs that such U.S. Holder would be deemed to own. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of Oi’s subsidiaries.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, such U.S. Holder may be able to make certain elections that may alleviate certain of the tax consequences referred to above. Where a company that is a PFIC meets certain reporting requirements, a U.S. Holder can avoid certain adverse PFIC consequences described above by making a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, election to be taxed currently on its proportionate share of the PFIC’s ordinary income and net capital gains. However, Oi does not intend to comply with the necessary accounting and record keeping requirements that would allow a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election with respect to Oi.

If Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange,” a U.S. Holder may make amark-to-market election with respect to the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, as the case may be. If a U.S. Holder makes themark-to-market election, for each year in which Oi is a PFIC, the holder will generally include as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, as the case may be, at the end of the taxable year over their adjusted tax basis, and will be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of themark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the election, the holder’s tax basis in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, as the case may be, will be adjusted to reflect the amount of any such income or loss. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will be treated as ordinary income. Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs will be considered “marketable stock” if they are traded on a qualified exchange, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. The NYSE is a qualified exchange and the B3 may constitute a qualified exchange for this purpose provided the B3 meets certain trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, surveillance and other requirements set forth in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. However, Oi cannot be certain that its Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will continue to trade on the B3 or the NYSE, respectively, or that its Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will be traded on at least 15 days in each calendar quarter in other than de minimis quantities. U.S. Holders should be aware, however, that for each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, the interest charge regime described above could be applied to indirect distributions or gains deemed to be attributable to such U.S. Holder in respect of any of Oi’s subsidiaries that also may be determined to be a PFIC, and themark-to-market election generally would not be effective for such subsidiaries. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor to determine whether amark-to-market election is available and the consequences of making an election if Oi were characterized as a PFIC.

If a U.S. Holder owns common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi during any year in which Oi was a PFIC, such U.S. Holder generally must file IRS Form 8621 with respect to Oi, generally with the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax return for that year.

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” in general, the gross amount of a distribution made with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi (which for this purpose shall include distributions of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity before any reduction for any Brazilian taxes withheld therefrom) will, to the extent made from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute a dividend to a U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxed on dividends from a qualified foreign corporation at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., gains with respect to capital assets held for more than one year). A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares or ADSs that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. U.S. Treasury Department guidance indicates that the ADSs of Oi (which are listed on the NYSE), but not the common or preferred shares of Oi, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Thus, subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” as of the date of this annual report, dividends that Oi pays on the ADS, but not on the Common Shares or Preferred Shares of Oi, meet the trading conditions discussed above required for these reduced tax rates. However, there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Furthermore, a U.S. Holder’s eligibility for such preferential rate is subject to certain holding period requirements and thenon-existence of certain risk reduction transactions with respect to the ADSs and such preferential rate is not available if Oi is a PFIC for the taxable year in which such dividend is paid or was a PFIC for the taxable year preceding the taxable year in which such dividend is paid. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders. Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” if a distribution exceeds the amount of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, it will be treated as anon-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi on which it is paid and thereafter as capital gain. Oi does not maintain calculations of the earnings and profits of Oi under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that distributions by Oi generally will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A dividend paid inreais will be includible in the income of a U.S. Holder at its value in U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the prevailing spot market exchange rate in effect on the day it is received by the U.S. Holder in the case of Common Shares or Preferred Shares or, in the case of a dividend received in respect of ADSs of Oi, on the date the dividend is received by the depositary, whether or not the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars. Assuming the payment is not converted at that time, the U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in reais equal to that U.S. dollar amount, which will be used to measure gain or loss from subsequent changes in exchange rates. Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder that subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of reais, which gain or loss is attributable to currency fluctuations after the date of receipt of the dividend, will be ordinary gain or loss. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.

The gross amount of any dividend paid (which will include any amounts withheld in respect of Brazilian taxes) with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as foreign source dividend income, which may be relevant in calculating a U.S. Holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, any Brazilian withholding tax will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for the U.S. foreign tax credit is calculated separately with respect to specific “baskets” of income. For this purpose, the dividends should generally constitute “passive category income,” or in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general category income.” The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Treatment of Preferred Stock

Section 305 of the Code provides special rules for the tax treatment of preferred stock. According to the U.S. Treasury Regulations under that section, the term preferred stock generally refers to stock which enjoys certain limited rights and privileges (generally associated with specified dividend and liquidation priorities) but does not participate in corporate growth to any significant extent. While Oi’s Preferred Shares have some preferences over its Common Shares, the Preferred Shares are not fixed as to dividend payments or liquidation value. Consequently, although the matter is not entirely clear, because the determination is highly factual in nature, it is more likely than not that the Preferred Shares of Oi will be treated as “common stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code. If the Preferred Shares are treated as “common stock” for purposes of section 305 of the Code, distributions to U.S. Holders of additional shares of such “common stock” or preemptive rights relating to such “common stock” with respect to their preferred shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders in most instances will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. On the other hand, if the Preferred Shares are treated as “preferred stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code, and if a U.S. Holder receives a distribution of additional shares or preemptive rights as described in the preceding sentence, such distributions (including amounts withheld in respect of any Brazilian taxes), as discussed more fully below, will be treated as dividends to the same extent and in the same manner as distributions payable in cash. In that event, the amount of such distribution (and the basis of the new shares or preemptive rights so received) will equal the fair market value of the shares or preemptive rights on the date of distribution.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi

A deposit or withdrawal of common shares or preferred shares by a U.S. Holder in exchange for the ADS that represent such shares will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi held by the U.S. Holder or the depositary, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in its common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi (determined in U.S. dollars) and the U.S. dollar amount realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other disposition of a share, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian tax. In the case of anon-corporate U.S. Holder, the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to capital gain generally will be lower than the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income (other than, as discussed above, certain dividends) if such holder’s holding period for such common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi exceeds one year (i.e., such gain is a long-term capital gain). Capital gain, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition or deposit of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi that is subject to Brazilian tax, the U.S. Holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian tax unless it can apply the credit against U.S. tax payable on other income from foreign sources in the appropriate income category, or, alternatively, it may take a deduction for the Brazilian tax if

it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

The initial tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder, or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder, will determine the dollar value of the cost of such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. The conversion of U.S. dollars to reais and the immediate use of that currency to purchase common shares, preferred shares or ADSs generally will not result in taxable gain or loss for a U.S. Holder.

With respect to the sale or exchange of common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, of Oi, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on the date of disposition. If the common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer, or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer, will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

Other Brazilian Taxes

Any Brazilian IOF/Exchange Tax or IOF/Bonds and Securities Tax (as discussed under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations” above) may not be treated as a creditable foreign tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes, although a U.S. Holder may be entitled to deduct such taxes if it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of these taxes.

3.8% Medicare Tax On “Net Investment Income”

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates or trusts may be required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi.ADSs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of the common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of the common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi that are paid to a U.S. Holder within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States) by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, unless such U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient such as a corporation. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if a U.S. Holder fails to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals are required to report information relating to an interest in the common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, of Oi, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi held in accounts maintained by U.S. financial institutions). U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their information reporting obligations, if any, with respect to their acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares, preferred shares,Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi.ADSs.

Documents on Display

Statements contained in this annual report regarding the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to this annual report summarize their material terms, but are not necessarily complete, and each of these statements is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document.

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, except that as a foreign issuer, we are not subject to the proxy rules or the short-swing profit disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these statutory requirements, we file with or furnish reports and other information to the SEC. Reports and other information filed or furnished by us to the SEC may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material may also be inspected at the offices of the NYSE, 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005, on which our ADRs are listed. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains information which we have filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the Internet athttp://www.sec.gov.

We also file financial statements and other periodic reports with the CVM, which are available for investor inspection at the CVM’s offices located at Rua Sete de Setembro, 111, 2nd2nd floor, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, and Rua Cincinato Braga, 340, 2nd, 3rd2nd, 3rd and 4th4th floors, São Paulo, SP. The telephone numbersCVM maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the CVM. The address of that website is http://www.cvm.gov.br. We also file consolidated financial statements and other periodic information with B3. The address of the CVM in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo are +55-21-3554-8686 and +55-11-2146-2000, respectively.B3 website is http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br.

Copies of ourOi’s annual report on Form20-F and documents referred to in this annual report and our Oi’sby-laws are available for inspection upon request at ourOi’s headquarters at Rua do Lavradio, 71, 2 andar – Centro, CEP20.230-070 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. OurOi’s filings are also available to the public through the internet at ourOi’s website at www.oi.com.br/ir. The information included on ourOi’s website or that might be accessed through ourOi’s website is not included in this annual report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The principal market for the products and services of our continuing operations is Brazil, and substantially all of the revenues of our continuing operations are denominated inreais.

Exchange Rate Risk

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk mainly because (1) a significant portion of our equipment costs, such as costs relating to switching centers and software used for upgrading network capacity, are primarily denominated in foreign currencies or linked to foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, other than those in which we earn revenues (primarilyreais), and (2) a significant portion of our borrowings and financing are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar. We are subject to market risk deriving from changes in interest rates because a significant portion of our indebtedness bears interest at floating rates. We have historically entered into derivative transactions to manage certain market risks, mainly our foreign currency exchange rate risk and our interest rate risk. However, in connection with our RJ Proceedings, we reversed our derivative financial instruments during the second and third quarters of 2016. In 2015,2016 prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, we developed and approved with Oi’s board of directors a new hedging policy that modified the risk management objectives from earnings to cash flow at risk. With the conclusion of our RJ Proceedings, and, hence, the accurate measurement of our risk factors, we have recently approved the hedging strategy for 2020 in line with our hedging policy, focused on cash flows, and liquidity, while complying with the financial covenants contained in our debt instruments. As of December 31, 2019, we had derivative instruments designed to hedge our short term U.S. dollar-linked debt interest payments, as well as part of our operating expenses contractually denominated in U.S. dollars.

Exchange Rate Risk

During 2019, approximately 32.4%28.8% of our capital expenditures were U.S. dollar-denominated or linked to the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical, instantaneous 10.0% depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 20152019 would have resulted in an increase of R$780.8714 million in the cost of our capital expenditures in 2015,during 2019, assuming that we would have incurred all of these capital expenditures notwithstanding the adverse change in the exchange rates.

Our financing cost and the amount of financial liabilities that we record are also exposed to exchange rate risk. As of December 31, 20152019, R$47,3729,521 million, or 78.5%52.2%, of our total consolidated indebtednessborrowings and financings was denominated in foreign currency. At December 31, 2015, we protected 99.5% of our indebtedness affected by exchange rate variation against significant variations in exchange rates (primarily U.S. dollars and euros) by using foreign currency, swaps, non-deliverable forwards and foreign currency investments. The aggregate amount of our hedge position, including our U.S. dollar and euro cash positions, was US$12,077 million as of December 31, 2015. Other than with respectafter giving effect to our portfolio of short-term non-deliverable forwards, the maturity of our swap contracts is coupled to the maturity of debt that is hedged by these swap contracts. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value ofadjustment to our swap contractsborrowings and non-deliverable forwards was a receivable in the amount of R$4,876 million. As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate notional principal amount of our swap contractsfinancing and non-deliverable forwards was approximately US$15,989 million, which mature in one to nine years.

During 2016, in connection with our consideration of potential plans to restructure our indebtedness, wedebt issuance costs. We have not rolled over our non-deliverable forwards and have selectively settled several of our long-term currency swaps. As a result, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations has increased substantially. In 2015, we experienced losses onrecorded foreign currency and monetary restatement duelosses of R$640 million during 2019 with respect to the depreciation of thereal againstour foreign currencies of R$1,799 million, including results recorded on our exchange rate hedges (non-deliverable forwards, swapscurrency-denominated financial liabilities and foreign currency investments). As we were almost 100% hedged,and monetary restatement gains of R$334 million during 2019 with respect to the fair value adjustment related to our foreign currency denominated debt, based on exchange rates in effect at the end of 2019. The potential additional losses on foreign currency and monetary restatement during 20152019 that would result from a hypothetical, instantaneous 10.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the euro as of December 31, 20152019 would be approximately R$53914 million, after giving effect to our results under our exchange rate swaps, assuming that the amount and composition of our debt instruments were unchanged. The potential increase in our total consolidated debt obligations that would result from a hypothetical, instantaneous 10.0% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the euro as of December 31, 20152019 would be approximately R$1,530 million, considering the net impact of the increase in our debt obligations and the decrease in our swap position. For further information about our swap agreements, see note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

953 million.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk because a significant portion of our indebtedness bears interest at floating rates. As of December 31, 2015, our2019, we had total outstanding indebtedness wasborrowings and financings of R$54,98131,642 million, of whichexcluding the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs, and R$20,15918,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. Of this outstanding balance after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs, R$8,641 million, or 33.40%47.8%, bore interest at floating rates, including R$11,209 million ofwasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest at floating rates primarily based on the CDI rate or TJLP rate, or IPCA rate, and R$8,95042 million of foreign currency-denominatedwasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest at fixed rates and R$23 million wasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest based on U.S. dollar and Euro LIBOR. As of December 31, 2015, we had interest rate swap agreements under which 59.60% of our consolidated indebtedness exposed to U.S. dollar and Euro LIBOR, which represents 14.83% of our total indebtedness, was converted into CDI rates, matching the interest rate index of our investments. As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any outstanding derivative agreements to limit our exposure to variations in the CDI rate, TJLP rate or IPCA rate.at TR (currently at zero).

We invest our excess liquidity (R$16,8262,299 million as of December 31, 2015)2019) mainly in (1) certificates of deposit and time deposits issued by global and domestic financial institutions with AAA and AA ratings from international rating agencies, (2) in short-term instruments denominated inreais that generally pay interest at overnight interest rates based on the CDI rate which partially mitigates our exposure to Brazilian interest rate risk, (2) certificates of deposit and time deposits issued by global and domestic financial institutions with AAA and AA ratings from international rating agencies, and (3) in investment funds created by top Brazilian asset managers exclusively for us. The fund managers of the investment funds created for us are responsible for managing our funds, subject to the direction of our senior management andinvestment policy, approved by Oi’s board of directors. Currently,As of the date of this annual report, these funds are comprised mainly of government bonds and otherlow-risk financial instruments linked to the CDI rate.and SELIC rates.

As we hedged our foreign currency denominated debt against exchange rate fluctuations, the cost

We recorded interest on borrowings payable to third parties and debentures of such indebtedness is linked to fluctuations in the CDI rate rather than the exchange rate.R$1,618 million during 2019. The potential additional interest expenseon borrowings payable to third parties during 20162019 that would resulthave resulted from a hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rates on January 1, 2016December 31, 2019 would be approximately R$132131 million after giving effect to our results under our interest rate swaps, considering the impact inon our debt obligations, but excluding the additional interest income that we would receive on our financial investments.obligations. This sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis points movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial liabilities and sustained over a period of one year. A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial assets and liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (e.g.,reais). As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the impact of interest rate fluctuation for such financial instruments, as consistently unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

Hedging Policy

We employ financial risk management strategies usingnon-deliverable forwards and dollar-denominated cash (natural hedge), and, in the future we may employ, cross-currency swaps, interest rate swaps and series swaps and non-deliverable forwards.swaps. Our financial risk management strategy is designed to protect us against devaluation of thereal against foreign currencies, and increases in foreign currency interest rates, according to our foreign-currency exposure in connection with our financings. We do not enter into derivatives transactions for speculative reasons or any other purposes.

 

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

The depositary collects its fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary also collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to providefee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:

 

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) for the issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property;

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) for the cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including in the event of the termination of the applicable deposit agreement;agreement relating to our ADSs;

 

US$0.02 (or less) per ADS (or portion thereof) for any cash distribution;

 

US$0.02 (or less) per ADS (or portion thereof) per calendar year for depositary services;

 

in the event of distributions of securities (other than ourOi’s Class A preferred shares)Preferred Shares), a fee equivalent to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADRs referred to above, which would have been charged, as a result of the deposit of such securities (treating such securities as Class A Preferred Shares for the purposes of this fee);

 

registration or transfer fees for the transfer and registration of shares on ourOi’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares;

 

expenses of the depositary for (1) cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the applicable the deposit agreement)agreements relating to our ADSs), and (2) converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars;

 

taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes, as necessary; and

 

any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities, as necessary.

Subject to certain terms and conditions, the depositary has agreed to reimburse usOi for certain expenses it incurs that are related to establishment and maintenance expenses of the ADS program, including the standardout-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, which consist of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to usOi is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors.

During the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, we did not receivereceived US$10 million in reimbursements from the depositary of our ADSs.

PART II

 

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Under the Trust Deed governing each of the Bonds issued by PTIF (other than the PTIF 6.25% Notes due 2016), or the PTIF Bonds, we were required to file audited financial statements of PTIF as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce no later than January 31, 2016. On April 29, 2016, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, the trustee under this Trust Deed, or the PTIF Trustee, delivered a written notice to PTIF and Oi noting that the failure of PTIF to provide the 2014 audited financial statements constituted a potential event of default under the PTIF Bonds and requesting the delivery of those financial statements. PTIF is continuing to work with its auditor to complete the preparation of its 2014 audited financial statements as soon as possible.

The PTIF Trustee has notified PTIF that if PTIF fails to deliver the financial statements on or prior to May 29, 2016 and the PTIF Trustee determines that this failure is materially prejudicial to the interests of the holders of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee could declare that the PTIF Bonds are immediately due and repayable. Under the terms of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee is not obliged to exercise its discretion to declare any PTIF Bonds immediately due and repayable or to take any other action to enforce the rights of the holders of the PTIF Bonds unless it shall have been indemnified to its satisfaction and specifically directed or requested to do so by a requisite percentage of the holders of the PTIF Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PTIF Bonds.

The terms of the instruments governing a substantial portion of our indebtedness contain cross-acceleration clauses and if any series of the PTIF Bonds were accelerated, this acceleration would enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness. Were a substantial amount of our outstanding indebtedness to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to repay such debt when due.Not applicable.

 

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DisclosureControlsDisclosure Controls and Procedures

Our chief executive officer, or CEO, and chief financial officer, or CFO, are responsible for establishing and maintaining our disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures were designed to ensure that information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms of the SEC, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20152019 under the supervision of our CEO and CFO.CFO (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) or 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Based on our evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015,2019, and that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that all material information relating to our company was reported as required because material weaknesses in the current operation of our internal control over financial reporting were identified as described below.required.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f).

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152019 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control —Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission ("COSO"). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2015,2019, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because material weaknesses existed. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified were:effective.

Our financial statement closing process, including transformation of our statutory financial statements into U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements, contains design and operating deficiencies severe enough that material errors may occur and may not be detected on a timely basis by management in the normal course of business.

We do not have sufficient and skilled accounting and finance personnel necessary to perform appropriate processes and controls to timely, consistently and appropriately identify, capture and analyze financially significant information in U.S. GAAP. As a result, audit adjustments were proposed and recorded by us in order to properly reflect certain non-routine transactions in our U.S. GAAP financial statements.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMGBDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., has issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152019 as stated in their report beginning onpage F-3.

Remediation of Prior Material Weakness

We have implemented and continue to implement measures designed to remediate the material weakness and, in the short term, to mitigate the potential adverse effectsDuring our management’s assessment of this material weakness.

We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our financial reporting controls and procedures in order to ensure our compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules promulgated by the SEC.

Actions taken and planned to be taken by management to improve the internal control over financial reporting include training session on U.S. GAAP matters for key membersas of December 31, 2018, our financial team, hiring external experts on U.S. GAAP to advise us on specific technical accountingmanagement identified a material weakness. The material weakness was that we did not design, establish or maintain effective controls over the integrity and accuracy of non-usualprior years’ related party transactions, senior level accounting personnel for our U.S. GAAP department to allow implementing additional preventwhich affected the current year balance sheet, including reconciliation, review and detectelimination of such transactions, in the consolidation process.

During 2019, we implemented and reinforced controls to improve annual financial statement closingensure correct and timely registration of related party transactions and adequate review of such transactions as controls to ensure the proper impact on the elimination and consolidation process.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2019.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as set forth above, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 20152019 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2019.

 

ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our fiscal council currentlyAs of the date of this annual report, Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee includes an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16A. Our fiscal councilOi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee has determined that Pedro Wagner Pereira CoelhoHenrique José Fernandes Luz is our fiscal councilOi’s audit committee financial expert. Mr. Coelho’sFernandes Luz’s biographical information is included in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.” Mr. CoelhoFernandes Luz is independent, as that term is defined in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act and 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

 

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to members of ourOi’s board of directors, fiscal council and board of executive officers, as well as to our other employees.

A copy of our code of ethics may be found on ourOi’s website at http://ri.oi.com.br/conteudo_en.asp?idioma=1&conta=44&tipo=43644. The information included on ourOi’s website or that might be accessed through ourOi’s website is not included in this annual report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.

ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit andNon-Audit Fees

The following table setstables set forth the fees billed to usOi by ourOi’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMGBDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., during the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

2019.

  Year ended December 31,   

Year ended December 31,

  2015   2014   

2019

  

2018

  (in millions ofreais)   (in millions ofreais)

Audit fees (1)

  R$4.8    R$10.4  

Audit fees(1)

  R$5.2  R$5.0

Audit-related fees(2)

   0.6     0.3    4.4  —  

Tax fees

   1.4     1.6    —    —  

All other fees(3)

   0.4     2.2    0.4  0.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

Total fees

  R$ 7.2    R$ 14.4    R$10.0  R$5.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees billed by KPMGBDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. in connection with the audits of ourOi’s annual financial statements, interim reviewsstatements.

(2)

Audit-related fees consist of our quarterly financial information,the aggregate fees billed by BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. for the issuance of audit and review reports in connection with registration statements.

(3)

All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed by BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. in connection with the issuance of comfort letters, review of financial statements and review of documents filed with the CVM and the SEC.letters.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

OurPrior to May 26, 2019, Oi’s fiscal council and board of directors have approved an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy that sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by our independent auditors may be pre-approved. This policy is designed to (1) provide both general pre-approval of certain types of services through the use of an annually established schedule setting forth the types of services that have already been pre-approved for a certain year and, with respect to services not includedserved as its audit committee in an annual schedule, special pre-approval of services on a case-by-case basis by our fiscal council and our board of directors, and (2) assess compliance with the pre-approval policies and procedures. Our management periodically reports to our fiscal council the nature and scope of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditors and is also required to report to our fiscal council any breach of this policy of which our management is aware.

ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

We are relyingreliance on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange ActAct. Since May 26, 2019, Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee has served as its audit committee in reliance on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act:

Under Brazilian law, Oi’s board of directors is prohibited from delegating its responsibilities regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for the following reasons:purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attestation services for Oi. Instead, Oi’s fiscal council or Audit, Risks and Controls Committee, as applicable, makes recommendations to Oi’s board of directors regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for such purposes and Oi’s board of directors is deemed to be its audit committee for such purposes. Before the engagement of any registered public accounting firm by Oi or its subsidiaries for such purposes, the engagement is approved by Oi’s board of directors. Before the engagement of any accountant by Oi or its subsidiaries to render non-audit services, the engagement was approved by Oi’s fiscal council prior to May 26, 2019 or has been approved by Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee subsequent to May 26, 2019.

 

we are
ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Oi is relying on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act. Oi is a foreign private issuer that has a fiscal council,an Audit, Risks and Controls Committee, which is a board of auditors (or similar body) established and selected pursuant to and as expressly permitted under Brazilian law;

Brazilian law requires our fiscal council to be separate from our boardand otherwise meets the requirements of directors;

members of our fiscal council are not elected by our management,Rule10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act, except that Oi’s Audit, Risks and none of our executive officers is a member of our fiscal council;

Brazilian law provides standards for the independence of our fiscal council from our management;

our fiscal council,Controls Committee, in accordance with its own charter as approved by the full board of directors, makes recommendations to ourOi’s board of directors regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged (including the intermediation of disagreements between ourOi’s management and ourOi’s independent auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attestattestation services for our company,Oi as Brazilian law requires that ourthese powers are reserved to Oi’s board of directors appoint, retain and oversee the work of our independent public accountants;

our fiscal council (1) has implemented procedures for receiving, retaining and addressing complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters, including the submission of confidential, anonymous complaints from employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing, and (2) has authority to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties; and

our company compensates our independent auditors and any outside advisors hired by our fiscal council and provides funding for ordinary administrative expenses incurred by the fiscal council in the course of its duties.
under Brazilian law.

We,Oi, however, dodoes not believe that ourits reliance on this general exemption will materially adversely affect the ability of our fiscal councilits Audit, Risks and Controls Committee to act independently and to satisfy the other requirements of the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

 

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

According to the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, foreign private issuers that are listed on the NYSE, such as Oi, are subject to a more limited set of corporate governance requirements than those imposed on U.S. domestic issuers. As a foreign private issuer, Oi must comply with the following four requirements imposed by the NYSE:

 

Oi must satisfy the audit committee requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act;

 

Oi’s Chief Executive Officer must promptly notify the NYSE in writing if any executive officer of Oi becomes aware of any materialnon-compliance with any of the applicable NYSE corporate governance rules;

 

Oi must provide a brief description of any significant ways in which Oi’s corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by U.S. domestic issuers under the NYSE corporate governance rules; and

 

Oi must submit an executed written affirmation annually to the NYSE and an interim written affirmation to the NYSE each time a change occurs to Oi’s board of directors or any committees of Oi’s board of directors that are subject to section 303A, in each case in the form specified by the NYSE.

Significant Differences

The significant differences between Oi’s corporate governance practices and the NYSE’s corporate governance standards are mainly due to the differences between the U.S. and Brazilian legal systems. Oi must comply with the corporate governance standards set forth under the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, the rules of the CVM and the applicable rules of the BM&FBOVESPA,B3, as well as those set forth in Oi’sby-laws.

The significant differences between Oi’s corporate governance practices and the NYSE’s corporate governance standards are set forth below.

Independence of Directors and Independence Tests

In general, the NYSE corporate governance standards require listed companies to have a majority of independent directors and set forth the principals by which a listed company can determine whether a director is independent. In general, listed companies are required to comply with the following NYSE corporate governance standards:

 

have a majority of independent directors;

 

have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed of independent directors with a charter that complies with the NYSE corporate governance rules; and

have a compensation committee composed of independent directors with a charter that complies with the NYSE corporate governance rules.

Although Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law and Oi’sby-laws establish rules in relation to certain qualification requirements of its directors, neither Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law nor Oi’sby-laws require that Oi have a majority of independent directors nor require Oi’s board of directors or management to test the independence of Oi’s directors before such directors are appointed.

Executive Sessions

The NYSE corporate governance standards requirenon-management directors of a listed company to meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.

According to the Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, up toone-third of the members of Oi’s board of directors can be elected to management positions. The remainingnon-management directors are not expressly empowered to serve as a check on Oi’s management, and there is no requirement that those directors meet regularly without management. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Oi’s board of directors consists entirely ofnon-management directors; therefore Oi believes it would be in compliance with this NYSE corporate governance standard.

Nominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company have a nomination/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each composed entirely of independent directors and each with a written charter that addresses certain duties.

Although not required under Brazilian law, Oi has a People, DesignationNomination and CompensationCorporate Governance Committee to assist its board of directors, with the purpose of (1) supervising human resources strategies and matters related to the organizational structure and attracting and retaining talent for Oi and its subsidiaries and matters related to the organizational structure;subsidiaries; (2) monitoring the succession program, the processes of selecting members of the management bodies and internal committees and special programs for human resources, at the discretion of the chairman of the board of directors; (3) analyzing and defining the total remuneration strategy and evaluating the performance of the members of the administrative bodies and the internal committees and the employees of Oi and its subsidiaries; and (4) making an annual evaluation of performance, based on defined goals, of the members of the administrative bodies and internal committees of Oi.

Although not required under Brazilian law, Oi has a Corporate Governance and Finance Committee to assist its board of directors, with the purpose of: (1)Oi; (5) monitoring the policies for corporate governance, maintaining the level of governance adopted by our CompanyOi and its subsidiaries and ensuring the effective adoption of best practices; (2) monitoring the principles and practices of conduct of Oi and its subsidiaries; (3)(6) monitoring compliance with the directives established in the Listing Regulations of the Level 1 of the BM&FBOVESPAB3 and other policies adopted by our Company,Oi, as well as other applicable legislation, regulations and foreign good practices, including, among others, conditions for maintaining Oi’s listing on the NYSE; and (4) supervising financial(7) monitoring the corporate culture based on the principles, values and tax planning, the annual budget, the financial performance of the business and various financial matters at the discretion of the chairman of thepurpose defined by Oi’s board of directors, atusing, among other practices, internal surveys and indicators of the level of Oiinternal communications and of its subsidiaries.whistleblower channels established by Oi.

Oi believes that these committeesthe People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee substantially serveserves the functions of the committees required under NYSE corporate governance standards, although the terms of reference of these committeesthis committee may not include each of the duties required under the NYSE corporate governance standards. The members of the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee satisfy the independence requirements of section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Additional Requirements

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a domestic listed company have an audit committee with a written charter that addresses certain specified duties and that is composed of at least three members, all of whom satisfy the independence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act and section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

As a foreign private issuer, that qualifies for the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees set forth in Section 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act, Oi ismembers of Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee are not subject to the independence requirements of section 303A.02 of the NYSE corporate governance standards. See “Item 16D. Exemptions fromNYSE’s Listed Company Manual, although they are subject to the Listing Standards forindependence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In addition, Oi’s Audit, Committees.”Risks and Controls Committee is not required to have a written charter that addresses the duties specified in section 303A.07(b) of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual although Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee does have a written charter that addresses these duties.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that shareholders of a listed company must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, subject to certain exceptions.

Under Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, shareholderpre-approval is required for the adoption and revision of any equity compensation plans, but this decision may be delegated to the board of directors.plans.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines that address certain minimum specified standards which include: (1) director qualification standards; (2) director responsibilities; (3) director access to management and independent advisors; (4) director compensation; (5) director orientation and continuing education; (6) management succession; and (7) annual performance evaluation of the board of directors.

Oi must comply with certain corporate governance standards set forth under Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law, CVM rules and the applicable rules of the BM&FBOVESPAB3 for Level 1 companies. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets” and “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA—BM&FBOVESPAB3—B3 Corporate Governance Standards.” The Level 1 rules do not require Oi to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines covering the matters set forth in the NYSE’s corporate governance standards. However, certain provisions of Brazilian CorporationCorporate Law that are applicable to Oi address certain aspects of director qualifications standards and director responsibilities.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or officers. Each code of business conduct and ethics should address the following items: conflicts of interest; corporate opportunities; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and proper use of company assets; compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws); and encouraging the reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior.

Although the adoption of a code of ethics is not required by Brazilian law, Oi has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its directors, officers and employees, which addresses each of the items listed above. See “Item 16B. Code of Ethics.”

 

ITEM 16H.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

PART III

 

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this item.

 

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

 

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

 

 (a)

Financial Statements

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

Management’s Report on Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting

  F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets of Oi S.A. as of December 31, 20152019 and 20142018

  F-5F-9

Consolidated Statements of Operations of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-7F-11

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) of Oi S.A.Loss for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-8F-12

Consolidated StatementsStatement of Changes in Equity of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-9F-13

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-10F-14

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-13F-16

 

 (b)

List of Exhibits

 

1.01  

By-laws of Oi S.A., – In Judicial Reorganization, as amended through November 13, 2015April 26, 2019 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.01 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 29, 2019).

2.01  

Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement (Common Shares), among Oi S.A., – In Judicial Reorganization, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to FormF-6 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February 28, 2012)2012 (accession no.0001019155-12-000106)).

2.02  

Form of American Depositary Receipt representing American Depositary Shares representing Common Shares (incorporated by reference to Form 424(b)(3) filed on January 1, 2016).

2.03

Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement (Preferred Shares), among Oi S.A., – In Judicial Reorganization, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to FormF-6 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February 28, 2012)2012 (accession no.0001019155-12-000107)).

2.04

Form of American Depositary Receipt representing American Depositary Shares representing Preferred Shares (included in Exhibit 2.03).

2.05

Judicial Reorganization Plan of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, dated December 20, 2017 (in Portuguese) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.03 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

2.06Judicial Reorganization Plan of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, dated December 20, 2017 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.04 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

2.07

Indenture, dated as of July  27, 2018, among of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, as the Company, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, Registrar, Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to FormF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on September 4, 2018).

2.08

Form of 10.000% / 12.000% Senior PIK Toggle Notes due 2025 (included in Exhibit 2.07).

2.09*

Description of Capital Stock.

2.10*

Description of Common ADSs.

2.11*

Description of Preferred ADSs.

4.01  Exchange

Call Option Agreement, dated September 8, 2014, among PT International Finance B.V., PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Oi S.A. and Telemar Participações S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.17 to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13D of Telemar Participações S.A. filed on September 17, 2014).

  4.02Call Option Agreement, dated September 8, 2014, among PT International Finance B.V., PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Oi S.A.– In Judicial Reorganization and Telemar Participações S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.18 to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13D of Telemar Participações S.A. filed on September 17, 2014).

  4.034.02  Private Instrument for the Assignment of Rights and Obligations and Other Covenants, dated March 24, 2015, among PT International Finance B.V., PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Telemar Participações S.A. and Oi S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.06 to Form 20-F of Oi S.A. filed on May 7, 2015).
  4.04First Amendment to the Call Option Agreement and Other Covenants, dated March 31, 2015, among PT International Finance B.V., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Telemar Participações S.A. and Oi S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Form 20-F of Oi S.A. filed on May 7, 2015).
  4.05Terms of Commitment, dated September 8, 2014, among Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Oi S.A. and Telemar Participações S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.19 to Amendment No. 4 to

Schedule 13D of Telemar Participações S.A. filed on September 17, 2014).
  4.06First Amendment to the Terms of Commitment, dated March 31, 2015, among Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Oi S.A. and Telemar Participações S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.09 to Form 20-F of Oi S.A. filed on May 7, 2015).
  4.07Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom S.A., No. 109/2011, dated June 30, 2011 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to FormF-4 of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on September 1, 2011).

  4.084.03  

Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreements for Local Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.05 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

  4.094.04  

Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom S.A., No. 143/2011, dated June 30, 2011 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
FormF-4 of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on September 1, 2011).

  4.104.05  

Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

  4.114.06  

Statement of Authorization for Personal Mobile Services between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 026/2002, dated December 18, 2002 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.05 to Form20-F of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on July 13, 2009).

  4.124.07  

Schedule of Omitted Authorizations for Personal Mobile Services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0910.11 to Form 20-FF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012)September 4, 2018).

  4.134.08  

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 24/2004, dated May 3, 2004 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Brasil Telecom S.A.’s annual report on Form20-F filed on July 13, 2009).

  4.144.09  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

  4.154.10  

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 24/2008, dated April 29, 2008 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.09 to Brasil Telecom S.A.’s annual report on Form20-F filed on July 13, 2009).

  4.164.11  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1310.15 to Form 20-FF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012)September 4, 2018).

  8.014.12  List

Instrument of subsidiaries.Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 4G services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 520/2012, dated October 16, 2012 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

12.014.13  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 4G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

4.14

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for services under the 450 MHz spectrum, between ANATEL and Oi S.A., No. 522/2012, dated October 16, 2012 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to FormF-1/A of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on October 4, 2018).

8.01*

List of subsidiaries of the Registrant.

12.01*

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.0212.02*  

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.0113.01*  

Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Extension Linkbase Document.

*

Filed herewith.

There are numerous instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term indebtedness of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and its consolidated subsidiaries, none of which authorizes securities that exceed 10% of the total assets of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreements to the SEC upon request.

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Date: May 19, 2016April 30, 2020 OI

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

/s/ BayardRodrigo Modesto de Paoli Gontijo

Abreu
 Name: BayardRodrigo Modesto de Paoli GontijoAbreu
 Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 19, 2016April 30, 2020 

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

/s/ Flavio Nícolay Guimarães

Camille Loyo Faria
 Name: Flavio Nícolay GuimarãesCamille Loyo Faria
 Title: Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

Management’s Report on Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting

  F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets of Oi S.A. as atof December 31, 20152019 and 20142018

  F-5F-9

Consolidated Statements of Operations of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-7F-11

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) of Oi S.A.Loss for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-8F-12

Consolidated StatementsStatement of Changes in Equity of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-9F-13

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Oi S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 20132017

  F-10F-14

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-13F-16

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152019 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by COSO.

As a result of management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, management concluded that the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting existed:

Our financial statement closing process, including transformation of our statutory financial statements into U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements, contains design and operating deficiencies severe enough that material errors may occur and may not be detected on a timely basis by management in the normal course of business.

We do not have sufficient and skilled accounting and finance personnel necessary to perform appropriate processes and controls to timely, consistently and appropriately identify, capture and analyze financially significant information in U.S. GAAP. As a result, audit adjustments were proposed and recorded by us in order to properly reflect certain non-routine transactions in our U.S. GAAP financial statements.

Because of the existence of this material weakness,2019, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffectiveeffective as of December 31, 2015.2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reportingOur independent registered public accounting firm has been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, which expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report as of December 31, 2015. Ours independent registered public accountants, KPMG Auditores Independentes, audited the consolidated financial statements2019, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, and their adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control did not affect their audit report to our financial statements.herein.

May 19, 2016April 30, 2020

 

/s/ Bayard De Paoli GontijoRodrigo Modesto de Abreu/s/ Camille Loyo Faria

Name:

Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu

   

/s/ Flavio Nicolay GuimarãesName:

Camille Loyo Faria

Name:

Title:

 Bayard De Paoli Gontijo

Chief Executive Officer

   Name:

Title:

 Flavio Nicolay Guimarães

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Title:

LOGO

  Chief Executive Officer

Tel.: +55 21 2210 5166

Fax: + 55 21 2224 5285

www.bdo.com.br

  Title:Chief Financial Officer

Rua Buenos Aires, 48

4º andar - Centro

Rio de Janeiro/RJ 20070-022

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ReportTo Stockholders and Board of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDirectors of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization

Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Oi S.A.

We have audited Oi S.A.’s – Under Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2019, based on criteria establishedinInternal Control Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(the “COSO criteria”). Oi S.A.’sIn our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as “the financial statements”) and our report dated April 30, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 15, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combinationApril 30, 2020, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

/s/ BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS
BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

LOGO

Tel.: +55 21 2210 5166

Fax: + 55 21 2224 5285

www.bdo.com.br

Rua Buenos Aires, 48

4º andar - Centro

Rio de Janeiro/RJ 20070-022

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To Stockholders and Board of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatementDirectors of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization

Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the company’s annualthree years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Apresent fairly, in all material weakness related torespects, the Company’s policiesfinancial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and procedures2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with respect toInternational Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the preparation of financial statements in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles has been identified and included in management’s assessment.International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Oi S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2015 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated May 19, 2016, which included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, on those financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Oi S.A. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO criteria.

/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes

KPMG Auditores Independentes

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

May 19, 2016

ReportCommittee of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

ToSponsoring Organizations of the BoardTreadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated April 30, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Directors and Shareholders of

Oi S.A.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Oi S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes2019.

Change in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearsaccounting principle

As discussed in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility isNote n°2(d.1) to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements, referred to above present fairly,the Company changed the manner in all material respects, the financial position of Oi S.A. and subsidiarieswhich it accounts for leases in 2019 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the yearsprovided by IFRS 16, Leases. This matter is also described in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.“Critical Audit Matters” section of our report.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has experienced a substantial declinecontinues to operate under Judicial Reorganization Plan (“PRJ”) in cash flows from operating activities which, considered togetheraccordance with the Company’s liquidity risks,requirements set forth in Law No. 11.101/2005 as well as has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net accumulated deficit and expects to continue to incur losses for at least the next twelve months. These events and conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. This matter is also described in the “Critical Audit Matters” section of our report.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We have also audited,conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicPCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Going concern assessment

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to operate under the PRJ in accordance with the requirements set forth in Law No. 11.101/2005 as well as has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net accumulated deficit and expects to continue to incur losses for at least the next twelve months. This matter is also described in the “Emphasis of Matter – Going Concern” section of our report.

We identified management’s judgments and assumptions used to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a critical audit matter due to inherent complexities and uncertainties related to the Company’s projections of operations under the PRJ. Auditing these judgments and assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Assessing the reasonableness of key assumptions underlying management’s forecast operating cash flows, including revenue growth and gross margin assumptions.

Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s forecast operating cash flows by comparing the forecasts to industry and analyst reports.

Evaluating the probability that the Company will be able to reduce capital expenditures and other operating expenditures if required.

Assessing management’s plans in the context of other audit evidence obtained during the audit to determine whether it supported or contradicted the conclusions reached by management.

Recoverability of long-term assets

As described in Notes 16 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of R$ 38,910,834 thousand and R$ 3,997,865 thousand, respectively. The Company tests these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts might be impaired. These calculations require the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal controlfactors, such as economic trends, industry trends, interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products provided by the Company. The use of different assumptions in the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis could have a significant impact on the recoverable amounts of respective assets. In July 2019, the Company disclosed its new Strategic Plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that aims at maximizing the Company’s value in the context of judicial reorganization. As a result of the 2019 impairment testing of intangible assets, the Company recognized an impairment loss of R$ 2,111,022 thousand.

We identified management’s judgments and assumptions used to perform impairment testing over long-term assets including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets as a critical audit matter. The judgments and assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis include the Company’s forecasted assumptions of future revenues, gross margins, and discount rates. Auditing these judgments and assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls related to management’s forecasting process, including controls over the data, inputs, and assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis including revenue growth rates, gross margins, and discount rates.

Evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used in management’s discounted cash flow analysis by comparing the forecasts to: (i) historical results, and (ii) Company’s internal communications to management and the Board of Directors, including the new 2019 Strategic Plan.

Utilizing personnel with specialized knowledge and skills in valuation to assist in: (i) evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used by comparing these assumptions to third-party industry projections and expectations, and (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of the discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analysis.

Provision for tax and civil contingencies

As described in Note 24 to the consolidated financial reportingstatements, the Company is a party to legal and administrative proceedings at civil, labor, and tax levels, which arise from the normal course of its business. The Company has recorded tax provisions of R$ 1,050,948 thousand and has disclosed tax contingent liabilities with possible unfavorable outcomes of R$ 28,416,097 thousand as of December 31, 2015,2019. In addition, the Company has recorded provisions for civil matters of R$ 2,149,700 thousand and has disclosed civil contingent liabilities with possible unfavorable outcomes of R$ 1,667,990 thousand as of December 31, 2019. The Company recognizes provision in the consolidated financial statements for the resolution of pending litigation when the Company has a present obligation as a result of a past event and management determines that a loss is probable, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. No provision for tax litigation is recognized in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes when, after assessing the information available: (i) management concludes that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending litigation or (ii) management is unable to estimate the loss of the pending matters. In the case of income tax pending litigation, management determines whether it is probable that the respective taxation authority will accept the uncertain tax treatment.

We identified management’s judgments related to the assessment of tax and civil provisions and contingencies as a critical audit matter due to the complex and significant auditor judgments required to assess the magnitude and probability of potential losses identified and evaluate the progress of and changes to expected outcomes. Auditing these judgments involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

With respect to the civil provisions and contingencies:

(i)

Evaluating the methodology, assumptions and criteria used by the Company in the recognition, measurement and disclosure of civil related provisions and contingencies in the consolidated financial statements;

(ii)

Reviewing external confirmation letters from the legal counselors with knowledge of civil proceedings to evaluate: (i) the existence and current status of the proceedings, and; (ii) the respective assessment of ranges of loss involved based on the appropriateness of legal positions asserted by the Company;

With respect to the tax provisions and contingencies, utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in tax matters to assist in:

(i)

Evaluating the methodology, assumptions and criteria used by the Company in the recognition, measurement and disclosure of tax related provisions and contingencies in the consolidated financial statements;

(ii)

Reviewing external confirmation letters from the legal counselors with knowledge of tax proceedings to evaluate: (i) the existence and current status of the proceedings, and; (ii) the respective assessment of ranges of loss involved based on the appropriateness of legal positions asserted by the Company;

(iii)

Evaluating the reasonableness of the defense nature, grounds and/or thesis, and possible changes in the potential outcome of loss for certain relevant tax proceedings, which involve complex judgment and subjectivity in evaluation, as well as obtaining, with the assistance of management, legal opinions from tax experts for certain proceedings with relevant changes in loss estimates.

Revenue recognition - unbilled

As described in Notes 4 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, at December 31, 2019 the Company recorded R$ 842,726 thousand of gross revenues related to services rendered and not yet billed. The amount of revenue recognized for unbilled services is dependent on criteria establishedthe Company’s information technology infrastructure which requires the use of various applications and systems to process, measure, and record large volumes of transactions arising from the Company’s core operations of rendering telecommunication services.

We identified the recognition of unbilled revenue as a critical audit matter because of judgments required by management inInternal Control — Integrated Framework(2013) estimating the amount of earned but unbilled revenues. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in performing audit procedures to evaluate unbilled revenue recognition.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls related to management’s process to estimate and record unbilled revenue including controls over: (i) the IT environment, including applications and systems used in generating the information necessary for the billing process, and (ii) the integrity of accounting entries related to the revenue cycle including unbilled revenue.

Testing the reasonableness of management’s estimation of unbilled revenue through: (i) substantively testing a sample of revenue transactions by reviewing relevant supporting documentation, and (ii) testing a sample of billings completed shortly after year-end against the recorded unbilled revenue amounts.

Federal tax credits originated from legal proceedings with final and unappealable decisions

As described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2019 the Company recognized federal tax credits totaling approximately R$ 3 billion. The Company filed legal proceedings to claim the right to deduct ICMS from the PIS and COFINS tax bases and for the recovery of past paid amounts, within the relevant statute of limitations. In 2019, the 1st and 2nd Region Federal Courts (Brasĺlia and Rio de Janeiro) issued final and unappealable decisions favorable to the Company on two of the three primary lawsuits filed by the CommitteeCompany relating to the deduction of Sponsoring OrganizationsICMS (State VAT) from the calculation bases of PIS and COFINS (taxes on sales).

We identified management’s calculations related to the federal tax credits as a critical audit matter because of the Treadway Commission (COSO),complexity of significant judgments required in the period of recognition. Auditing these judgments involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and our report dated May 19, 2016 expressed an adverse opinionextent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in federal tax matters to assist in:

(i)

Analyzing the legal documentation related to the legal proceedings with final and unappealable decisions;

(ii)

Evaluating the supporting calculations of federal tax credits made by the Company including the applicable monetary adjustments, considering the period of origin of the legal proceedings; and

(iii)

Evaluating the reasonableness of projections made by management for the segregation of the federal tax credits between short and long-term categories for the purpose of presentation in the consolidated financial statements.

Adoption of IFRS 16 Leases

As described in Note 2(d.1) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted IFRS 16, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect of the early implementation recognized on the effectivenessdate of adoption. As at January 1, 2019, the initial adoption of the standard resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets within the noncurrent assets and corresponding lease liabilities totaling R$ 8,167,932 thousand.

We identified the adoption of IFRS 16 as a critical audit matter. Implementing the new accounting standard required management’s judgment related to: (i) evaluation of the new accounting standard and establishment of new accounting policies and practices, (ii) determining the completeness and accuracy of in scope lease contracts as of the adoption date, and (iii) evaluating inputs and assumptions used in recording the impact of the adoption including application of available practical expedients and the determination of the appropriate incremental borrowing rate. Auditing the Company’s adoption of IFRS 16 was especially challenging and complex due to the audit effort required to analyze the effect of the adoption on the significant number of lease contracts and the specialized skills and knowledge needed to assess the reasonableness of the incremental borrowing rates utilized.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Evaluating management’s accounting policies and practices, including the reasonableness of management’s judgments and assumptions related to: (i) evaluation of the appropriate incremental borrowing rate, and (ii) evaluation of practical expedients elected.

Testing a sample of lease contracts by evaluating the appropriateness of relevant inputs and assumptions, including lease term and incremental borrowing rate, utilized by management to calculate the operating lease right-of-use asset and corresponding operating lease liability balances.

Testing the completeness and accuracy of lease contracts, included in management’s adoption procedures.

Utilizing personnel with specialized knowledge and skills in valuation to assist in assessing the reasonableness of the incremental borrowing rates used to calculate the operating lease liability as of the adoption date.

Legal investigations in the context of “Operação Mapa da Mina”

As described in Note 32(c) to the consolidated financial statements, on December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched the 69th phase Operation: Lava Jato (Car Wash), named “Operation: Mapa da Mina” (Mine Plan). In response to allegations, the Company has created a Multidisciplinary Committee consisting of members from different departments, including the legal, compliance, internal control over financial reporting.audit and accounting department, to determine procedures to be performed, and set a schedule of relevant activities in response to the allegations of the investigation involving the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company’s Audit Committee oversees the activities of the Multidisciplinary Committee on a continuous basis.

We identified management’s assessment of pending legal investigation as a critical audit matter. Auditing management’s positions and procedures performed in response to the alleged illegal acts committed by the Company, the uncertainties inherent to the investigations still in progress by the MPF and PF involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in forensic matters to assist in:

(i)

Reviewing and observing the appropriateness and the scope of procedures performed and conclusions reached in the Company’s internal independent investigation conducted by the independent and specialized law firm.

(ii)

Evaluating the nature of the matters discussed in the reports prepared by the external legal advisors of the Company and whether such matters may represent possible legal and regulatory impact related to various claims included in the investigations in progress from the MPF and PF.

(iii)

Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s conclusions derived from the internal independent investigation and assessing the appropriateness of possible impact on the recognition, measurement and disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

(iv)

Evaluating various supporting documents collected by management during the Company’s internal independent investigation and assessing the appropriateness of conclusions reached.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

April 30, 2020, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

 

/s/ KPMGBDO RCS Auditores Independentes

KPMG Auditores Independentes

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 SS

May 19, 2016

BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2015 and 2014

(In thousands of Brazilian reais -Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Note  12/31/2015   12/31/2014 

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  7   14,898,063     2,449,206  

Short-term investments

  7   1,801,720     171,415  

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of R$561,139 in 2015 and R$513,787 in 2014

  8   8,379,719     7,450,040  

Derivative financial instruments

  3/17   606,387     340,558  

Other taxes

  10   922,986     1,054,255  

Recoverable taxes

  9   1,062,851     1,158,133  

Judicial Deposits

  11   1,258,227     1,133,639  

Pension plan assets

  23   753     1,744  

Held-for-sale assets

  26   7,686,298     34,254,682  

Other assets

     1,597,283     1,662,157  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     38,214,287     49,675,829  

Non-current assets

      

Long-term investments

  7   125,966     111,285  

Other taxes

  10   659,899     741,911  

Deferred taxes

  9   856,457     3,694,238  

Derivative financial instruments

  3/17   6,780,316     2,880,923  

Judicial Deposits

  11   13,119,130     12,260,028  

Investments

  12   154,890     148,411  

Property, plant and equipment, net

  13   25,817,821     26,244,309  

Intangible assets

  14   11,780,136     13,553,821  

Pension plan assets

  23   1,529,194     1,103,337  

Other assets

     296,505     327,242  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

     61,120,314     61,065,505  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     99,334,601     110,741,334  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current liabilities

      

Trade payables

  15   5,035,793     4,359,785  

Loans and financing

  16   11,809,598     4,463,728  

Derivatives financial instruments

  3/17   1,988,948     523,951  

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

     660,415     744,439  

Current income taxes payable

  9   339,624     477,282  

Other taxes

  10   1,553,651     1,667,599  

Tax financing program

  19   78,432     94,041  

Contingencies

  20   1,020,994     1,058,521  

Liability for pensions benefits

  23   144,589     129,662  

Dividends and interest on capital

     96,433     185,138  

Licenses and concessions payable

  18   911,930     675,965  

Liabilities associated to held-for-sale assets

  26   745,000     27,178,222  

Other payables

  21   1,219,624     1,021,719  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     25,605,031     42,580,052  

Non-Current liabilities

      

Loans and financing

  16   48,047,819     31,385,667  

Derivative financial instruments

  3/17   521,395     142,971  

Other taxes

  10   924,337     874,727  

Tax financing program

  19   716,656     896,189  

Contingencies

  20   3,413,972     4,073,247  

Liability for pensions benefits

  23   399,431     346,873  

Licenses and concessions payable

  18   6,607     685,975  

Other payables

  21   3,052,913     2,602,556  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     57,083,130     41,008,205  

   Note   December 31, 2019   December 31, 2018 

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   8    2,081,945    4,385,329 

Short-term investments

   8    183,850    201,975 

Accounts receivable

   9    6,334,526    6,516,555 

Inventories

     326,934    317,503 

Recoverable income taxes

   10    542,726    621,246 

Other taxes

   11    1,089,391    803,252 

Judicial Deposits

   12    1,514,464    1,715,934 

Dividends and interest on capital

   29    426   

Pension plan assets

   27    5,430    4,880 

Prepaid expenses

   13    670,344    743,953 

Held-for-sale assets

   31    4,391,090    4,923,187 

Other assets

   14    852,155    1,079,670 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     17,993,281    21,313,484 

Non-current assets

      

Long-term investments

   8    33,942    36,987 

Deferred tax assets

   10    99,175    23,050 

Other taxes

   11    2,995,559    715,976 

Judicial Deposits

   12    6,651,383    7,018,786 

Pension plan assets

   27    54,615    64,253 

Prepaid expenses

   13    583,736    522,550 

Other assets

   14    437,667    250,862 

Investments

   15    133,765    117,840 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   16    38,910,834    28,425,563 

Intangible assets

   17    3,997,865    6,948,446 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-current assets

     53,898,541    44,124,313 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     71,891,822    65,437,797 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current liabilities

      

Trade payables

   18    4,794,309    5,024,260 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

   18    799,631    201,602 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

     852,585    906,655 

Derivative financial instruments

   19    1,152   

Borrowings and financing

   20    326,388    672,894 

Income taxes payable

   10    66,654    27,026 

Other taxes

   11    886,763    1,033,868 

Dividends and interest on capital

     5,731    6,168 

Licenses and concessions payable

   21    58,582    85,619 

Leases payable

   22    1,510,097   

Tax financing program

   23    86,721    142,036 

Provisions

   24    547,996    680,542 

Liabilities associated toheld-for-sale assets

   31    494,295    526,870 

Other payables

   25    1,405,013    1,381,919 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2015 and 2014

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Shareholders’ equity

  22   

Preferred shares, no par value

     4,094,909    14,292,197  

Authorized 157,727 shares; issue and outstanding 155,915 shares in 2015 and 565,036 in 2014

     

Common shares, no par value

     17,343,465    7,146,023  

Authorized 668,034 shares; issue and outstanding 519,752 shares in 2015 and 277,730 in 2014

     
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total share capital

     21,438,374    21,438,220  

Share issue costs

     (444,943  (309,592

Capital reserves

     17,762,546    17,640,287  

Treasury shares

     (5,531,092  (2,367,552

Obligations in equity instruments

      (2,894,619

Other comprehensive income

     (609,894  131,082  

Accumulated losses

     (17,159,098  (7,993,946
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity attributable to Oi S.A. and subsidiaries

     15,455,893    25,643,880  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest

  26   1,190,547    1,509,197  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     16,646,440    27,153,077  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     99,334,601    110,741,334  
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais -Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Note  2015  2014  2013 

Net operating revenue

  4   27,353,765    28,247,099    28,422,147  

Cost of sales and services

  5   (16,250,083  (16,257,192  (16,466,773
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

     11,103,682    11,989,907    11,955,374  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (expenses) income

      

Selling expenses

  5   (4,719,811  (5,565,757  (5,532,045

General and administrative expenses

  5   (3,912,178  (3,834,563  (3,683,440

Other operating income (expenses), net

  5   (1,258,655  2,023,622    1,243,100  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before financial expenses and taxes

     1,213,038    4,613,209    3,982,989  

Financial (expenses), net

  6   (6,538,008  (4,548,922  (3,301,956
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

     (5,324,970  64,287    681,033  

Income tax and social contribution

  9   (3,379,927  (758,268  (76,610

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     (8,704,897  (693,981  604,423  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) for the year from discontinued operations, net

  26   (867,139  (4,086,449  —    

Net income (loss) for the year

     (9,572,036  (4,780,430  604,423  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

     (9,159,343  (4,781,720  604,423  

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests

     (412,693  1,290    —    
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) allocated to common shares – basic and diluted

     (3,947,142  (1,569,149  189,711  

Net income (loss) allocated to preferred shares - basic and diluted

     (5,212,201  (3,212,571  414,712  

Weighted average number of outstanding shares

      

(in thousands of shares)

      

Common shares – basic and diluted

     314,518    202,312    51,476  

Preferred stock – basic and diluted

     415,321    414,200    112,527  

Net income (loss) per share attributable to owners of the Company (in Reais):

      

Common shares - basic and diluted

     (12.55  (7.76  3.69  

Preferred stock - basic and diluted

     (12.55  (7.76  3.69  

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operation attributable to owners of the Company:

      

Common shares - basic and diluted

     (11.36  (1.13  3.69  

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

     (11.36  (1.13  3.69  

Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operation attributable to owners of the Company:

      

Common shares - basic and diluted

     (1.19  (6.63  —    

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

     (1.19  (6.63  —    
   Note   December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 

Total current liabilities

     11,835,917   10,689,459 

Non-current liabilities

     

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

   18    3,293,427   3,593,008 

Borrowings and financing

   20    17,900,361   15,777,012 

Other taxes

   11    1,224,038   628,716 

Leases payable

   22    6,639,929  

Tax financing program

   23    330,782   411,170 

Provisions

   24    4,703,684   4,358,178 

Provision for pension plans

   27    633,012   579,122 

Other payables

   25    7,534,166   6,505,321 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Totalnon-current liabilities

     42,259,399   31,852,527 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     54,095,316   42,541,986 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

   26    

Share capital

     32,538,937   32,038,471 

Share issuance costs

     (801,073  (377,429

Capital reserves

     3,906,771   11,532,995 

Treasury shares

     (33,315  (2,803,250

Accumulated losses

     (17,727,954  (17,530,108

Other comprehensive loss

     (233,040  (208,359
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity attributable to the Company and subsidiaries

     17,650,326   22,652,320 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-controlling interest

     146,180   243,491 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     17,796,506   22,895,811 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     71,891,822   65,437,797 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013Operations

(In thousands of Brazilian reais -Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   2015  2014  2013 

Net income (loss) for the year

   (9,572,036  (4,780,430  604,423  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   172,597    384,677   

Less reclassification of losses included in discontinued operations

   (481,499  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (308,902  793,006   

Available-for-sale

    

Unrealized gain

   1,907,018    408,329    —    

Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income for other-than-temporary losses on investment

   (2,315,347  —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (408,329  408,329   

Pension and other postretirement benefits plans:

    

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   121,664    (327,215  236,481  

Less amortization of prior service cost and actuarial gain (loss) included in net periodic pension cost

   39,151    1,954    26,142  

Net actuarial gain (loss) from discontinued operations

    (910,654 

Less reclassification of actuarial gains included in discontinued operations

   901,453    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefits plans

   1,062,268    (1,235,915  262,623  

Changes in effective portion of the fair value of hedging financial instrument

   (802,063  163,550    (206,998

Less reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)

   4,113    22,497    (4,114
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (797,950  186,047    (211,112

Tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Pensions from continuing operations

    110,589    (89,292

Pensions from descontinued operations

    196,000   

Less reclassification of pension tax effects included in discontinued operations

   (194,020  

Hedging financial instruments

    (63,256  71,778  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (194,020  243,333    (17,514
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (10,218,969  (4,793,959  638,420  

Less comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

   (318,650  124,726   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

   (9,900,319  (4,918,685  638,420  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Note   December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 

Net operating revenue

   4    20,136,183   22,060,014   23,789,654 

Cost of sales and services

   5    (15,314,814  (16,179,100  (15,668,653
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

     4,821,369   5,880,914   8,121,001 
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (expenses) income

      

Selling expenses

   5    (3,547,684  (3,853,002  (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   5    (2,782,300  (2,738,718  (3,136,808

Other operating income

   5    4,527,710   2,204,134   1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   5    (5,996,465  (6,761,586  (5,227,766
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     (7,798,739  (11,149,172  (10,482,029
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
      

Loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes

     (2,977,370  (5,268,258  (2,361,028

Financial income

   6    2,662,463   30,950,461   7,136,459 

Financial expenses

   6    (8,772,181  (4,341,595  (10,332,971
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses)

     (6,109,718  26,608,866   (3,196,512
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) before taxes

     (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

      

Current

   7    (77,060  115,706   (906,080

Deferred

   7    69,041   3,159,241   (192,542
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

     (9,095,107  24,615,555   (6,656,162
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

     (9,000,434  24,591,140   (6,365,019

Profit (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

     (94,673  24,415   (291,143

Profit (loss) allocated to common shares – basic and diluted

     (8,764,803  22,036,074   (4,896,241

Profit (loss) allocated to preferred shares—basic and diluted

     (235,631  2,555,066   (1,468,778

Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands of shares)

      

Common shares – basic and diluted

     5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

     155,615   155,915   155,915 

Profit (loss) per share from continuing operations:

      

Common shares—basic and diluted

   26    (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Preferred shares—basic and diluted

   26    (1.51  16.39   (9.42

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013Comprehensive Income

(In thousands of Brazilian reais -Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

  Attributable to owners of the Company  Total equity
attributed to
controlling
shareholder’s
  Non-controlling
shareholder’s
  Total equity 
 Share
capital
  Share
issue

costs
  Capital
reserves
  Obligations
in equity
instruments
  Treasury
shares
  Reserve
for
additional
dividends
  Accumulated
losses
  Other
comprehensive
income (loss)
    

At January 1, 2013

  7,308,753    (56,609  17,362,822     (2,104,524  391,322    (2,707,161  234,050    20,428,653     20,428,653  

Capital increase with redeemable shares

  162,456     (162,456        

Redeemable bonus shares

    (162,456       (162,456   (162,456

Share issue costs

   62          62     62  

Approval of proposed additional dividends

       (391,322    (391,322   (391,322

Interim dividends (R$03.049 per share)

    (500,000       (500,000   (500,000

Net income (loss) for the year

        604,423     604,423     604,423  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

         33,997    33,997     33,997  

Recognition of investment reserve

    1,493,015       (1,493,015    

Balance at December 31, 2013

  7,471,209    (56,547  18,030,925     (2,104,524   (3,595,753  268,047    20,013,357     20,013,357  

Acquisition of interests - PT Portugal

           1,468,602    1,468,602  

Capital increase

  13,959,900           13,959,900     13,959,900  

Capital increase with reinvestment tax incentives

  7,111     (7,111        

Attributed dividends

           (84,131  (84,131

Share issue costs

   (253,045        (253,045   (253,045

Obligations in equity instruments

     (2,894,619      (2,894,619   (2,894,619

Treasury shares

      (263,028     (263,028   (263,028

Loss (profit) for the year

        (4,781,720   (4,781,720  1,290    (4,780,430

Realization of legal reserve

    (383,527     383,527      

Other comprehensive income (loss)

         (136,965  (136,965  123,436    (13,529

Balance at December 31, 2014

  21,438,220    (309,592  17,640,287    (2,894,619  (2,367,552   (7,993,946  131,082    25,643,880    1,509,197    27,153,077  

Acquisition of interests – TMARPart (Note 1)

    122,413       (5,809   116,604     116,604  

Capital increase

  154     (154       —       —    

Share exchange costs

   (135,351        (135,351   (135,351

Obligations in equity instruments

     (268,921      (268,921   (268,921

Exchange for treasury shares

     3,163,540    (3,163,540     —       —    

Loss for the year

        (9,159,343   (9,159,343  (412,693  (9,572,036

Other comprehensive income (loss)

         (740,976  (740,976  94,043    (646,933

Balance at December 31, 2015

  21,438,374    (444,943  17,762,546     (5,531,092   (17,159,098  (609,894  15,455,893    1,190,547    16,646,440  
   2019  2018  2017 

Profit (loss) for the year

   (9,095,107  24,615,555   (6,656,162

Hedge accounting loss

   (1,152  

Actuarial gains (losses)

   (9,795  105,515   30,253 

Exchange losses on investment abroad

   (16,372  (110,098  163,770 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pre-tax comprehensive income

   (9,122,426  24,610,972   (6,462,139
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of taxes on other comprehensive income:

    

Actuarial loss

    (35,875  (10,371
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   (9,122,426  24,575,097   (6,472,510
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

   (9,025,115  24,625,063   (6,203,313

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (97,311  (49,966  (269,197

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013Changes in Shareholders’ Equity / (Deficit)

(In thousands of Brazilian reais -Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   2015  2014  2013 

Operating activities

    

Net income (loss) for the year

   (9,572,036  (4,780,430  604,423  

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   867,139    4,086,449   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities

    

Interest loss on financial instruments

   6,442,647    1,311,198    1,881,041  

Derivatives financial instruments

   (5,795,744  (425,027  (1,131,012

Depreciation and amortization

   6,195,039    5,766,702    5,691,824  

Impairment of available-for-sale securities

   447,737    

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   726,944    649,463    849,779  

Contingencies

   566,617    463,087    381,949  

Liabilities for pension plans

   (107,368  (162,974  (133,415

Impairment of assets

   524,870    18,293    429,024  

Deferred income tax expense

   2,598,351    136,267    (341,888

Other, net

   89,059    (331,758  (1,546,618

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition

    

Accounts receivable

   (1,622,343  (1,057,184  556,009  

Inventories

   74,776    (38,721  (53,696

Other taxes

   119,887    (790,262  (594,144

Held-for-trading

   (8,790,093  (4,754,150  (6,230,243

Redemption of held-for-trading

   7,958,169    5,021,859    8,203,246  

Trade payables

   117,271    (221,347  (250,056

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (351,128  (198,428  (972

Contingencies

   (1,079,323  (775,583  (934,039

Net increase in income tax and social contribution

   154,873    (133,511  (221,654

Liabilities for pension plans

   (139,325  (131,156  (124,246

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (786,914  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities - continuing operations

   (1,539,013  3,652,787    7,035,312  

Cash flows from operating activities - discontinued operations

   485,342    1,877,782   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used) generated by operating activities

   (1,053,671  5,530,569    7,035,312  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2015  2014  2013 

Investing activities

    

Capital expenditures

   (3,681,484  (5,370,351  (5,976,488

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

   14,996    4,453,611    4,127  

Cash received for the sale of PT Portugal (Note 26)

   17,218,275    

Judicial deposits

   (2,044,796  (1,660,987  (1,693,945

Redemption of judicial deposits

   1,039,221    722,836    958,529  

Acquisition of investment in PT Portugal on May 5, 2014

    1,087,904   

Cash and cash equivalents transferred to held-for-sale assets

    (730,572 

Other

   191,546    8,091    (62,528
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities - continuing operations

   12,737,758    (1,489,468  (6,770,305

Cash flows from investing activities - discontinued operations

   (194,739  (2,813,437 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash generated by (used in) investing activities

   12,543,019    (4,302,905  (6,770,305

Financing activities

    

Borrowings net of costs

   7,218,639    2,665,098    3,434,762  

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing

   (11,308,213  (4,587,978  (3,483,640

Cash impacts on derivatives transactions

   2,704,155    (465,961  (84,318

Licenses and concessions

   (348,545  (204,779  (710,968

Tax refinancing program

   (93,266  (870,215  (174,455

Capital increase

    8,230,606   

Issue premium and related costs

    (403,375 

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (57,608  (5,172  (1,280,162

Cash and cash equivalents acquired by merger

   20,346    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities - continuing operations

   (1,864,492  4,358,224    (2,298,781

Cash flows from financing activities - discontinued operations

   (492,194  (5,532,725 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (2,356,686  (1,174,501  (2,298,781

Foreign exchange differences on cash equivalents

   3,316,195    (28,787  50,443  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   12,448,857    24,376    (1,983,331

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   2,449,206    2,424,830    4,408,161  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   14,898,063    2,449,206    2,424,830  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-cash transactions

   2015   2014  2013 

Acquisition of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible assets (incurring liabilities)

   568,973     (122,072  637,884  

Offset of judicial deposits against contingencies

   374,295     405,329    495,259  

Share exchange (Note 22.b and Note 27)

   3,163,540     

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Other transactions

   2015  2014  2013 

Income tax and social contribution paid

   (626,703  (755,512  (640,152

Financial charges paid

   (4,057,529  (2,852,682  (2,448,391
  Attributable to owners of the Company  Total
controlling
interest
  Non-controlling
interest
  Total
shareholders’
equity
 
 Share
capital
  Share
issuance
costs
  Capital
reserves
  Treasury
shares
  Accumulated
losses
  Other
comprehensive
loss
 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  21,438,374   (377,429  13,242,374   (5,531,092  (42,335,925  (242,282  (13,805,980  293,457   (13,512,523

Effects of the first-time adoption of IFRS 9 and 15

      282,135    282,135    282,135 

Balance at January 1st, 2018

  21,438,374   (377,429  13,242,374   (5,531,092  (42,053,790  (242,282  (13,523,845  293,457   (13,230,388

Capital increase

  10,600,097    1,013,883      11,613,980    11,613,980 

Delivery of treasury shares as per the JRP

    (2,727,842  2,727,842      

Share subscription warrants

    4,580      4,580    4,580 

Profit for the year

      24,591,140    24,591,140   24,415   24,615,555 

Other comprehensive income

      (67,458  33,923   (33,535  (74,381  (107,916

Balance at December 31, 2018

  32,038,471   (377,429  11,532,995   (2,803,250  (17,530,108  (208,359  22,652,320   243,491   22,895,811 

Capital increase

  500,466    3,837,009      4,337,475    4,337,475 

Share issuance costs

   (423,644      (423,644   (423,644

Share buyback

     (2,572    (2,572   (2,572

Pharol Agreement (Note 1)

    (2,462,799  2,772,507   (197,846   111,862    111,862 

Loss for the year

      (9,000,434   (9,000,434  (94,673  (9,095,107

Absorption of capital reserves

    (9,000,434   9,000,434     

Other comprehensive loss

       (24,681  (24,681  (2,638  (27,319

Balance at December 31, 2019

  32,538,937   (801,073  3,906,771   (33,315  (17,727,954  (233,040  17,650,326   146,180   17,796,506 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Non-cash items

    

Loss (gain) on financial instruments (Note 6)

   3,606,618   (2,043,357  5,120,203 

Fair value adjustment to borrowings and financing (Note 6)

   527,465   (13,928,659 

Present value adjustment to other liabilities (Note 6)

   59,214   (1,167,043  (4,873,000

Gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings (Note 6)

    (11,054,800 

Transaction with derivative financial instruments (Note 6)

   (55,025  

Depreciation and amortization (Note 5)

   6,873,945   5,811,123   5,109,292 

Onerous obligation (Note 5)

   1,230,820   4,883,620  

Expected credit losses on receivables (Note 5)

   489,396   851,271   784,403 

Impairment losses (reversal) (Note 5)

   2,111,022   291,758   (4,747,141

Provisions/(reversals) (Note 5)

   216,438   93,026   7,362,304 

Earnings of equity investees

   5,174   13,492   433 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

   235,535   215,398   211,735 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee – ANATEL

   359,465   68,333   88,658 

Employee and management profit sharing

   260,207   237,253   298,789 

Tax Recovery (Notes 5 and 6)

   (3,617,919  

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals) (Note 6)

   1,620,378   226,870   674,668 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program (Note 6)

   16,159   28,079   27,294 

Other

   (538,974  (637,251  450,281 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   4,312,830   5,229,721   4,950,379 

Changes in assets and liabilities

    

Accounts receivable

   (306,240  (365,771  (253,469

Inventories

   (21,113  (48,280  173,283 

Taxes

   1,322,267   121,951   477,164 

Investment and redemption of financial assets

   40,141   (87,744  174,256 

Trade payables

   (678,046  (860,900  (374,003

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (313,169  (253,902  (42,727

Licenses and concessions

   (127,313  

Provisions

   (462,299  (434,974  (426,649

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (29,829  (257,643  701,416 

Other assets and liabilities

   (252,683  525,660   (467,067
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (828,284  (1,661,603  (37,796

Financial charges paid – debt

   (926,910  (19,215  (1,412

Financial charges paid – other

   (352  (2,884  (2,515

Income tax and social contribution paid – Company

   (85,680  (495,038  (314,162

Income tax and social contribution paid – third parties

   (159,966  (188,445  (192,736
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (1,172,908  (705,582  (510,825
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash generated by operating activities

   2,311,638   2,862,536   4,401,758 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Continued

  December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Capital expenditures

   (7,425,513  (5,246,241  (4,344,238

Proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles

   106,097   22,276   5,016 

Dividends received from investments abroad (Note 33)

   226,525   

Judicial deposits

   (477,010  (775,953  (425,563

Redemption of judicial deposits

   719,223   1,083,043   343,129 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (6,850,678  (4,916,875  (4,421,656

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing, and derivatives

   (11,824  (161,884  (659

Proceeds from derivative financial instrument transactions

   72,113   

Capital increase

   4,000,000   

Commitment to investors premium

   (58,489  

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

    (1,491  (104,449

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (151,862  (265,495  (226,776

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (437  (54  (59,462

Payment of Leases

   (1,611,273  

Exercise of warrants

    4,580  

Share buyback

   (2,572   (300,429
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   2,235,656   (424,344  (691,775

Foreign exchange differences on cash equivalents

    1,328   11,105 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows for the year

   (2,303,384  (2,477,355  (700,568
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

    

Closing balance

   2,081,945   4,385,329   6,862,684 

Opening balance

   4,385,329   6,862,684   7,563,252 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes in the year

   (2,303,384  (2,477,355  (700,568
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additional Disclosures Relating to the Statement Of Cash Flows

Non-cash transactions

   December 31,
2019
   December 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 

Acquisition of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible assets (incurring liabilities)

   490,395    1,034,475    1,451,068 

Offset of judicial deposits against provision for contingencies

   395,143    845,088    382,071 

Shares issued to backstop investors

   337,475     

Settlement of payables for own shares (Pharol Agreement - Notes 1 and 26 (b))

   46,680     

Conversion of debt into shares

     11,613,980   

Reconciliation of liabilities resulting from financing activities

The changes in financial charges and the settlement of the debt resulting from financing activities are presented in Note 20.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possessionand Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION

GENERAL INFORMATION

Oi S.A. – under Judicial Reorganization (“Company” or “Oi”), is a Switched Fixed-line Telephony Services (“STFC”) concessionaire, operating since July 1998 in Region II of the General Concession Plan (“PGO”), which covers the Brazilian states of Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Goiás, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, and the Federal District, in the provision of STFC as a local and intraregional long-distance carrier. Since January 2004, the Company has also providedprovides domestic and international long-distance services in all Regions. Additionally, since January 2005, it has providedRegions and local services outside of Region II.II started to be provided in January 2005. These services are provided under concessions granted by Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações - es—ANATEL (National Telecommunications Agency), the regulator forof the Brazilian telecommunications industry.industry (“ANATEL” or “Agency”).

The Company is domiciledheadquartered in Brazil, with headquarters located atin the city of Rio de Janeiro, at Rua do Lavradio, 71 – Rio de Janeiro.2º andar.

The Company also holds: (i) through its wholly-owned subsidiary Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – in Judicial Reorganization (“TMAR”Telemar”), a concession to provide fixed telephone services in Region I and international long-distance services nationwide;nationwide International Long-distance services; and (ii) through its indirect subsidiary Oi Móvel S.A. – in Judicial Reorganization (“Oi Móvel”) a license to provide mobile telephony services in Region I, II and III.

In Africa, the Company provides fixed and mobile telecommunications services through own subsidiaries and the subsidiaries of Africatel Holdings B.V. (“Africatel”), and in Asia the Company provides fixed, mobile, and other telecommunications services basically related through its subsidiary Timor Telecom (Note 31).

The Company is registered with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Its shares are traded on B3 S.A. – Brasil, Stock Exchange, OTC (“B3”) and its American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) representing Oi common shares and preferred shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Concession agreements

The local and nationwide STFC long-distance concession agreements betweenentered into by the Company and its subsidiary TMAR, andTelemar with ANATEL are effective throughuntil December 31, 2025. These concession agreements provide for reviews on a five-year basis and in general provide forhave a greaterhigher degree of intervention by ANATEL in the management of the business than the licenses to provide private services, and also include several consumer protection provisions, as determined by ANATEL the regulator. On December 30, 2015, ANATEL announced that the due date for the review to be implemented byservices. At the end of 2015 had been postponed2018, ANATEL published Public Hearing No. 51/2018 to address the revision of the Concession Agreements for the concession’s last five-year period (2021-2025). The contribution period to the Public Hearing ended on March 26, 2019, and the draft in being analyzed by ANATEL. It is worth noting that the recently enacted Law 13879/2019 creates the legal possibility to migrate from the public utility regime to the STFC provision under private law (still subject to regulation by ANATEL), as well as the possibility of successive renewals of the Concession over a20-year period.

On December 31, 2016.21, 2018, the Government enacted Decree 9619/2018, which repeals Decree 7512/2011 and approves a New PGMU (“PGMU IV”). The highlight of the New PGMU is the fact that the New PGMU introduces a significant reduction in the plant of payphones (“TUP”) currently in use. As a replacement for the payphones no longer required, the concessionaires are required to implement wireless fixed access systems supporting broadband connections in certain locations, the deadline of which is December 2023.

The Company also holds investmentsWith the approval of the Judicial Reorganization Plan (“PRJ” or “Plan”), ANATEL initiated some procedures aiming at monitoring the Company’s financial situation, as well as to assess its Company’s ability to discharge its obligations arising from the terms of the concession agreements. In March 2019, ANATEL decided, among other issues, to maintain the special monitoring of the provision of telecommunications services of the Oi Group companies in Africa, where2019 by imposing actions related to transparency, corporate governance, and corporate control, financial and operating performance, and asset and credit management, as informed in the Notice to the Market disclosed by the Company provides fixed and mobile telecommunications services indirectly through Africatel Holding BV (“Africatel”). The Company provides services in Namibia, Mozambique, and São Tomé, among other countries, through its subsidiaries Mobile Telecommunications Limited (“MTC”), Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique (“LTM”), and CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, SARL (“CST”). Additionally, Africatel holds an indirect 25% stake in Unitel S.A. (“Unitel”) and a 40% stake in Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A. (“CVT”), which provide telecommunications services in Angola and Cape Verde. In Asia, the Company provides fixed and mobile telecommunications services through its subsidiary Timor Telecom.

Certain items in these consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Summary of acquisitions, corporate restructuring and divestures

Company’s capital increase through the contribution by Pharol (formerly Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., “Pharol”)of all PT Portugal shareson May 8, 2019.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

On February 10, 2020, as reported in the Notice to the Market released by the Company, ANATEL’s Board of Directors concluded there was no longer the need for special monitoring based on the decision issued in May 2019 as it considers that the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ short-term liquidity risk has been extinguished and revoked the obligations previously imposed on the Oi Group companies.

Judicial Reorganization

On June 20, 2016, the Company – under Judicial Reorganization and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries Oi Móvel, Telemar, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – under Judicial Reorganization (“Copart 4), Copart 5 Participações S.A. – under Judicial Reorganization (“Copart 5”, merged, see Nota 32), Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.—under Judicial Reorganization, and Oi Brasil Holdings Cooperatief U.A.—under Judicial Reorganization (“Oi Holanda”) (collectively with the Company, the “Oi Companies”) filed a petition for judicial reorganization with the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro (“Judicial Reorganization Proceeding”).

On December 19, 2017, after confirming that the required quorum of classes I, II, III, and IV creditors was in attendance, the General Creditors’ Meeting was held and the Oi Companies’ judicial reorganization plan (“Plan” or “PRJ”) was approved by a vast majority of creditors on December 20, 2017.

On January 8, 2018, the judicial reorganization court (“Judicial Reorganization Court”) issued a decision that ratified the JRP and granted the judicial reorganization to the Oi Companies, which was published on February 5, 2018.

On July 31, 2018, the restructuring of the Oi Companies’ financial debt was completed with the implementation of the applicable terms and conditions provided for in the JRP, including the completion of the first capital increase provided for in the JRP, Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization.

On January 25, 2019 the Company completed the second capital increase provided for in the JRP (“Capital Increase—New Funds”), with the issue of 3,225,806,451 book-entry, registered common shares, without par value, including new common shares represented by ADSs, pursuant to the JRP and the subscription and commitment agreement entered into by the Company, its subsidiaries, and the Backstop Investors.

Capital Increase – New Funds

Exercise of Subscription Warrants and American Depositary Warrants (“ADWs”)

On October 28, 2018, Oi commenced the issuance and delivery of all warrants and ADWs exercised by their holders. The process was completed on January 4, 2019. All warrants that were not exercised on or prior to January 2, 2019 have been cancelled.

Preferential offer and completion of the Capital Increase – New Funds, pursuant to the commitment agreement terms

As contemplated by Section 6 of the JRP, on November 13, 2018 the Company commenced a preemptive offering of common shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of common shares and preferred shares, including the ADS Depositary and The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of the Preferred ADS program, received transferable rights for each common share or preferred share held as of November 19, 2018, which refers to as subscription rights.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, the Company issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial common shares. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess common shares. The proceeds of these subscriptions totaled R$2,011 million.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

As mentioned below,

On January 25, 2019, the Company issued 1,604,268,162 common shares, representing the total number of common shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial common shares and excess common shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the terms of the commitment agreement for the aggregate amount of R$1,989 million (“Share Balance”). Because of the subscription and payment of the Share Balance, the Company completed, on this date, the Capital Increase – New Funds, through the subscription and payment of all 3,225,806,451 New Common Shares issued as part of the business combination,Capital Increase – New Funds, representing a capital increasecontribution of new funds for the Company totaling R$4.0 billion. In addition, under the terms of the commitment agreement, on that date the Company wasissued, as compensation for their commitments under the commitment agreement, 272,148,705 common shares in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors. As a result of the outcome of the subscription and payment of the Capital Increase – New Funds and the Commitment Shares, the Company’s share capital increased to R$32,538,937,370.00, represented by 5,954,205,001 shares, divided into 5,796,477,760 registered common shares and 157,727,241 registered preferred shares, without par value.

Litigation discontinuation settlement between the Company and Pharol

On February 8, 2019, in order to discontinue any disputes that might harm the implementation of the JRP, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that its Board of Directors approved, which was partially paid-in throughin accordance with CVM Instruction 567/2015, the contribution, by Pharol,acquisition of all the1,800,000 preferred shares issued by PT Portugalthe Company to ensure the compliance of the commitment assumed by the Company to transfer its treasury shares to Bratel, wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol SGPS, S.A., in the context of the settlement entered into, subject matter of the Material Fact Notice of January 8, 2019 (“PT Portugal”Settlement”)., in transactions conducted in B3’s OTC to deliver the treasury shares to Bratel, which would be made within four business days from the confirmation of the settlement by the Judicial Reorganization Court.

PursuantOn February 18, 2019, the Court issued a decision suspending conflict of jurisdiction injunction No. 157.099 during the period requested by the parties.

On April 3, 2019, the Company disclosed a notice to the Definitive Agreements executedmarket to inform on February 19, 2014, which described the steps necessary to implement this Transaction, the Company’s Board of Directors decided at the meetings held on April 28 and 30, 2014, to increase capital by R$13,217,865 through a public distribution of Company common and preferred shares, with the issue of 2,142,279,524 common shares, including 396,589,982 common shares in the form of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), and 4,284,559,049 preferred shares, including 828,881,795 preferred shares in the form of ADSs.

On May 5, 2014, Banco BTG Pactual S.A., as Public Offering Stabilizing Underwriter, exercised, partconfirmation of the distribution optionsettlement, referred to above, because thefifteen-day term for 120,265,046 Oi common shares and 240,530,092 Oi preferred shares (“Overallotment Shares”), amounting to R$742,035. As a result, on said date the Company capital increased to R$21,431,109.

The shares were issued atpublication of the price of R$2.17 per common share and R$2.00 per preferred share. The common shares in the form of ADSs (“ADSs ON”, each representing one common share) were issued at the price of US$0.970 per ADS ON, and the preferred shares in the form of ADSs (“ADSs PN”, each representing one preferred share) were issued at the price of US$0.894 per ADS PN.

Finally, the issued shares were paid in (i) in assets, by Pharol through the contribution to the Company of all PT Portugal SGPS, S.A. (“PT Portugal”) shares, which held all the (i.a) operating assets of Pharol amounting to R$30,299 (mostly represented by available-for-sale securities, tangible and intangible assets), except its direct or indirect interests in the Company and in Contax Participações S.A., and (i.b) liabilities of Pharol at the contribution date amounting to R$33,115 (mostly represented by non-current debt),related court decision has run out. Accordingly, as determined in the Valuation Report preparedSettlement, the term for the compliance with the second part of the obligations established by Banco Santander (Brasil)both parties to the Settlement started on this same date, including: (a) the request to discontinue all the litigation involving the parties named in the Agreement and (b) the delivery to Bratel of 33.8 million Oi shares there were held in treasury, including 32 million common shares and 1.8 million preferred shares.

In addition, several obligations and rights of the parties described in the Material Fact Notice released by Oi and the Communication released by Pharol, both on January 9, 2019, were fully clearly established.

Oi S.A. (“PT Assets”)Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, approvedunless otherwise stated)

Default Payment Method provided for by Clause 4.3.6 of the Plan—Bondholders

On May 20, 2019, in strict compliance with the decision issued under Chapter 15 that determined that the cancelation of the notes regulated by New York Law should take place on June 14, 2019, the Company announced that it started the procedure so that the holders of the notes (a) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €500,000,000 in 4.375% notes maturing in 2017 (ISIN No.: XS0215828913); (b) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €750,000,000 in 5.875% notes maturing in 2018 (ISIN No.: XS0843939918); (c) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €750,000,000 in 5.00% notes maturing in 2019 (ISIN No.: XS0462994343); (d) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €1,000,000,000 in 4.625% notes maturing in 2020 (ISIN No.: XS0927581842); (e) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €500,000,000 in 4.5% notes maturing in 2025 (ISIN No.: XS0221854200); (f) Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.’s €600,000,000 in 5.625% notes maturing in 2021 (ISIN No.: XS1245245045); (g) Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.’s US$1,500,000,000 in 5.75% notes maturing in 2022 (ISIN No.: US10553MAD39); (h) Oi S.A.’s €750,000,000 in 5.125% notes maturing in 2017 (ISIN No.: XS0569301327); (i) Oi S.A.’s US$750,000,000 9.500% maturing in 2019 (ISIN No.: 87944LAD1); (j) Oi S.A.’s BRL1,100,000,000 in 9.75% maturing in 2016 (ISIN No. US10553MAC55); and (k) Oi S.A.’s US$1,000,000,000 in 5.500% maturing in 2020 (ISIN No. 144A: US87944LAE92) (the “Legacy Notes”) are able to support their claims to receive on a future date or on the Company’s payment dates pursuant to Clause 4.3.6 of the Plan.

The procedure detailed above is not applicable for the holders of the 6.25% Notes issued by Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – in Judicial Reorganization maturing in 2016 (ISIN No.: PTPTCYOM0008). The Company will provide at the appropriate time the information on the procedure to register the beneficiaries of the Default Payment Method provided for by Clause 4.3.6 of the Plan with regard to such series.

Prepetition Financing – Clause 5.3 of the Plan

On December 23, 2019, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that its subsidiary Oi Móvel entered into a 1st issue indenture of collateralized, simple, nonconvertible debentures, with additional trust security, in a single series, for private placement, in the total amount of up to R$2,500,000,000.00 (“Debentures” and “Issue”, respectively). The main features of the Issue and the Debentures are as follows: (i) Term and Maturity Date: twenty-four (24) months from the issue date, except in the case of early redemption and early maturity of the Debentures set forth in the Debenture Indenture; (ii) Payout: U.S. dollar foreign exchange fluctuation plus interest of (i) twelve pointsixty-six percent (12.66%) per year (PIK) for the first twelve months after the first repayment is made; and (ii) thirteen pointsixty-one percent (13.61%) per year thereafter; and (iii) Guarantees: the Debentures will be backed by collaterals and trust guarantees provided by Oi Móvel, the Company and its subsidiary Telemar.

The Issue was approved based on the provisions of Clause 5.3 of the Plan and is part of the context of prepetition financing, in the “Debtor in Possession Financing” (“DIP Financing”) modality.

Subsequently to the Material Fact Notice disclosed on December 23, 2019, the Company disclosed a Notice to the Market on February 4, 2020 informing shareholders and the general market that the subscription and payment of the Oi Móvel Issue had been completed, described above, for private placement in the amount of R$2,500,000,000.00.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization

On December 6, 2019, the Company released a Material Fact Notice informing that the Oi Companies filed a petition with the Judicial Reorganization Court requesting that the court oversight of the Oi Companies not to be terminated on February 4, 2020, the date when the Plan’s homologation completes two years.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Thenon-termination of the judicial oversight does not introduce any changes to the current position of the Oi Companies and has no impact on the compliance with the Plan in force or on current receivables, or any other new funds that might be obtained by the Oi Companies. It is worth noting that the continuity of court oversight at the end of thetwo-year period is a natural measure that has been applied in most judicial reorganization proceedings.

Notwithstanding the good progress of the Plan implementation, which has already concluded most of the steps provided for the proceeding, which were important for the Company’s Shareholders’ Meeting heldrecovery, said petition presents the Judicial Reorganization Court with circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the Judicial Reorganization Proceeding’s magnitude and to the reforms underway in the legal and regulatory environment, and which require actions still to be implemented within the scope of the Judicial Reorganization Proceeding.

On February 28, 2020, the Company released a Material Fact Notice informing its shareholders and the general market that on February 28, 2020 the Oi Companies filed with the Judicial Reorganization Court a petition exposing its interest in submitting for deliberation to a new general creditors’ meeting (“New GCM”) an amendment to the Plan aimed at achieving greater operating and financial flexibility to continue its investment project and the compliance with its strategic transformation plan (“Strategic Plan”), both broadly disclosed to the market.

In line with the foregoing, on March 27, 2014; and (ii) cash,6, 2020, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that the Judicial Reorganization Court awarded a decision, on the subscriptionsame date, in local legal tender amounting to R$8.25 billion. Accordingly,granting the Company’s capital increase totaledrequest for a New General Creditors’ Meeting to deliberate on an amendment to the gross amount of R$13.96 billion, including PT’s assets valued at R$5.71 billion.

Sale of PT Portugal Shares

The sale of all the shares of PT Portugal to Altice Portugal S.A. (“Altice”), involving basically the operations of PT Portugal in Portugal and in Hungary, was completed on June 2, 2015 (see note 26 for financial impacts). After this sale, the Company retained its stakes in the following former PT Group subsidiaries:Plan, prescribing that:

 

 (i)100% of

the shares of PT Participações SGPS, S.A. (“PT Participações”), holding ofOi Companies file with the operations in Africa, through Africatel Holdings BV (“Africatel”),court, within 180 days from the decision’s issue date, the draft amendment to the JRP; and Timor, through Timor Telecom, S.A. (“Timor Telecom”);

 

 (ii)100%

the Trustee organize the New General Creditors’ Meeting, which shall be held within 60 days from the submission of the shares of Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. (“PTIF”), CVTEL B.V. (“CVTEL”), and Carrigans Finance S.à.r.l. (“Carrigans”).amendment proposal to the JRP.

Accordingly, taking into consideration that the decision above was issued on March 11, 2020, the Company shall submit the amendment to the JRP to the court by September 8, 2020, with the New GCM expected to occur on November 6, 2020.

The purpose of the amendment proposal to the JRP will be increasing the flexibility of the JRP by creating a more efficient corporate and operating structure, aiming at maximizing the Company’s value to the benefit of all its stakeholders. This initiative is fully aligned with the Strategic Plan, which is being transparently implemented.

Company subsidiaries

The table below shows the equity interests held in the capital of the Company’s subsidiaries:

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Corporate reorganization

On March 31, 2015, the shareholders of TmarPart acting at a pre-meeting of the shareholders of TmarPart (1) unanimously approved the adoption of an alternative share structure, after analyzing options and taking into consideration the obstacles to the completion of the previously announced merger of shares of Oi and TmarPart, and (2) authorized the managements of TmarPart and Oi to begin taking the applicable steps to implement the alternative share structure. The alternative share structure was intended to achieve many of the primary purposes of the merger of shares of Oi and TmarPart, including the adoption by our company of the best corporate governance practices required by BM&FBovespa’s Novo Mercado segment and the elimination of the control of Oi through the various shareholders’ agreements governing Oi, while maintaining the goal of implementing a transaction that would result in the listing of the shares of Oi on the Novo Mercado.

The implementation of the alternative share structure consisted of the corporate ownership simplification transactions (described below), the adoption of new by-laws of our company, the election of a new board of directors of our company, and a voluntary share exchange through which holders of our preferred shares were entitled to exchange their preferred shares for our common shares (“voluntary convertion”).

On September 1, 2015, we and several of our direct and indirect shareholders undertook the following transactions, which we refer to collectively as the corporate ownership simplification transactions:

AG Telecom merged with and into PASA;

LF Tel merged with and into EDSP;

PASA and EDSP merged with and into Bratel Brasil;

Valverde merged with and into TmarPart;

Venus RJ Participações S.A., Sayed RJ Participações S.A. and PTB2 S.A. merged with and into Bratel Brasil;

Bratel Brasil merged with and into TmarPart; and

TmarPart merged with and into our company.

In connection with these transactions, all of the shareholders agreements to which we were an intervening party and through which the direct and indirect shareholders of TmarPart had rights to influence our management and operations were terminated. In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, the net assets of TmarPart, in the amount of R$122,412 were merged into the shareholders’ equity of Oi and as a result of the merger, TmarPart ceased to exist. The merger of TmarPart with and into Oi also resulted in the recognition its shareholders’ equity of a tax benefitCompanies related to the step up of tax basis the goodwill in the amount of R$982,768 with a corresponding valuation allowance by the same amount derived from the acquisition of equity interest in TmarPart recorded by Bratel Brasil, AG Telecom, LF Tel, in accordance with applicable Brazilian law. This tax benefit was recorded directly in equity as it was a transaction amongcontinuing operations

Company

  Core business  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

Oi Holanda

  Raising funds in the international
market
  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

Portugal Telecom Internacional Finance B.V

  Raising funds in the international
market
  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

CVTEL, BV

  Investment management  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

Carrigans Finance S.à.r.l.

  Investment management  Luxembourg   100%      100%   

Rio Alto Gestão de Créditos e Participações S.A. (“Rio Alto”)

  Receivables portfolio management and
interests in other entities
  Brazil   100%      100%   

Oi Serviços Financeiros S.A. (“Oi Serviços Financeiros”)

  Financial services  Brazil   99.87%    0.13%    99.87%    0.13% 

Bryophyta SP Participações Ltda.

  Property investments  Brazil   99.80%    0.20%    99.80%    0.20% 

Telemar

  Fixed telephony – Region I  Brazil   100%      100%   

Oi Móvel

  Mobile telephony – Regions I, II, and
III
  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Empreendimentos S.A.

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Acquirer Gestão de Meios de Pagamentos Ltda.

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Administradora Ltda. (“Paggo Administradora”)

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Serede – Serviços de Rede S.A. (“Serede”)

  Network services  Brazil   17.51%    82.49%    17.51%    82.49% 

Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimídia Ltda. (“BrT Multimídia”)

  Data traffic  Brazil     100%      100% 

Dommo Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.

  Purchase and sale of real estate  Brazil     100%      100% 

Brasil Telecom Call Center S.A. (“BrT Call Center”)

  Call center and telemarketing services  Brazil     100%      100% 

BrT Card Serviços Financeiros Ltda. (“BrT Card”)

  Financial services  Brazil     100%      100% 

Pointer Networks S.A. (“Pointer”)

  Wi-Fi internet  Brazil     100%      100% 

Pointer Peru S.A.C

  Wi-Fi internet  Peru     100%      100% 

VEX Venezuela C.A

  Wi-Fi internet  Venezuela     100%      100% 

VEX USA Inc.

  Wi-Fi internet  United States of
America
     100%      100% 

VEX Ukraine LLC

  Wi-Fi internet  Ukraine     40%      40% 

PT Participações, SGPS, S.A. (“PT Participações”)

  Management of equity investments  Portugal   100%      100%   

Oi Investimentos Internacionais S.A. (“Oi Investimentos”)

  Business consulting and management
services, preparation of projects and
economic studies, and investment
management
  Portugal     100%      100% 

Africatel GmbH & Co.KG.

  Investment management  Germany     100%      100% 

Africatel GmbH

  Investment management  Germany     100%      100% 

Africatel Holdings, BV

  Investment management  The Netherlands     86%      86% 

TPT—Telecomunicações Publicas de Timor, S.A. (“TPT”)

  Provision of telecommunications,
multimedia and IT services, and
purchase and sale of related products
in Timor
  Portugal     76.14%      76.14% 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and with shareholders’ of Oi.

In the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi, shareholders of TmarPart received the same number of shares of Oi as were held by TmarPart immediately prior to the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi in proportion to their holdings in TmarPart. No withdrawal rights for the holders of shares of Oi were available in connection with the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Companies classified as assets held for sale

 

Company

  

Core business

  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A.

  Management of equity interests in the context of international investments  Portugal     86%      86% 

Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda. (“Directel”)

  Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases, in international operations  Portugal     86%      86% 

Directel Cabo Verde – Serviços de Comunicação, Lda.

  Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases in Cape Verde  Cape Verde     51.60%      51.60% 

Kenya Postel Directories, Ltd.

  Production, publishing and distribution of telephone directories and other publications  Kenya     51.60%      51.60% 

Elta—Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola, Lda.

  Telephone directory publishing  Angola     47.30%      47.30% 

Timor Telecom, S.A.

  Telecommunications services concessionaire in Timor  Timor     44%      44% 

CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A. R.L.

  Operation of fixed and mobile telecommunication public services in São Tomé and Principe  São Tomé     43.86%      43.86% 

LTM—Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, Lda.

  Management, publishing, operation and sale of telecommunications subscriber and classified ads directories  Mozambique     43%      43% 

At an extraordinary shareholders meeting of our company held on September 1, 2015, our shareholders (1) adopted amended by-laws for our company that were intended to increaseThe equity interests in joint arrangements and interests in associates are measured using the corporate governance standards applicable to our companyequity method and are as well as to limit the voting rights of holders of a large concentration of common shares, and (2) elected a new board of directors with terms of office until the shareholders’ meeting that approves our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2017.

With regard to the Voluntary Conversion, a total of 314,250,655 Oi preferred shares, or 66.84% of total preferred shares ex-treasury, were offered for conversion by their holders, attaining the minimum acceptance threshold of 2/3 of the holders of preferred shares ex-treasury to which the Voluntary Conversion was subject, was reached.

The Company’s Board of Directors ratified the voluntary conversion, accepted the conversion requests filed by the holders of Preferred ADSs, and approved the summon of the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting to reflect the new share structure, as a result of the Voluntary Conversion, in the Company’s Bylaws.

Going concern considerations

During 2015, our operations generated negative cash flows of R$1,054 million. As a result, we financed investing activities, debt service and working capital from our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments. Historically, we have financed our investments in property, plant and equipment through the use of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing.

As of December 31, 2015, our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments amounted to R$16,700 million and our consolidated indebtedness amounted to R$ 59,857 million. We anticipated that we will be required to spend approximately R$19,725 million to meet our short-term contractual obligations and commitments during 2016, and an additional approximately R$30,672 million to meet our long-term contractual obligations and commitments in 2017 and 2018. As a result this financial situation doubt about Company’s ability to continue on a going concern basis.

Oi’s operating and business focus remains unchanged and Oi is still committed to continuing to make investments that ensure a continue improvement of its quality of service, which it believes will allow it to continue to bring technological advances to its customers all over Brazil. Oi also continues to undertake efforts for the operating upgrading and transformation of its business by focusing on austerity, infrastructure optimization, process revision, and sales actions.

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist us in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreement with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)follows:

 

Company

  

Core business

  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

 

Companhia AIX de Participações (“AIX”)

  Data traffic  Brazil     50%      50% 
Paggo Soluções e Meios de Pagamento S.A. (“Paggo Soluções”)  Financial company  Brazil     50%      50% 
Gamecorp S.A. (“Gamecorp”)  Pay TV service, except programmers  Brazil     29.90%      29.90% 

Hispamar Satélites S.A. (“Hispamar”)

  Satellite operation  Brazil     19.04%      19.04% 

Going concern

OurThe financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have2019, has been prepared assuming that wethe Company will continue as a going concern based on our cash flow projectionsand in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. The judicial reorganization is aimed at ensuring the continuation of the Oi Companies as going concerns. This continuity was strengthen with the approval of the JRP and, as a result, the borrowings and financing were novated and the related balances were recalculated under the terms and conditions of the JRP, including the Capital Increase with Claim Capitalization and the Capital Increase with New Funds.

The continuity of the Company as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful implementationoutcome of strategic alternativesthe judicial reorganization and the realization of other forecasts of the Oi Companies.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to optimize the liquidityConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the judicial reorganization proceedings and debt profile. Our projections depend on factors such as attainment of traffic volume targets, customer base, launching of bundled products attractive to customers, service sales prices, foreign exchange fluctuationeven though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the success of the efforts to identifyjudicial reorganization and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize the liquidity and debt profile.

Should one of more of the assumptions underlying the Company cash flow projections and other forecasts, the financial support of the Company, or the outcome of the efforts to identify and implement financial and strategic alternatives to optimize the Company liquidity and debt profile not be met, this could be an indication of material uncertainties that would generatepossibly cast doubts as to the Company’sOi Companies’ ability to realizecontinue as going concerns. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the JRP, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,796,506, loss for the year then ended was R$9,095,107, and working capital totaled R$6,157,364. As at December 31, 2018 and after the recognition of the effects of the JRP, total shareholders’ equity was R$22,895,811, profit for the year then ended was R$24,615,555, and working capital totaled R$10,624,025.

Since December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that COVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic.

As of the date of this annual report, the Company has not been able to quantify any material impacts related to COVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its assetsmedium- and settle its obligationslong-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on operations and sales, particularly for the fiber-to-the-home network expansion. For more details see note 33 (d).

Additionally the debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require to the Company to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at their carrying amounts.the date the financial covenants are tested, the Company is not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of the real subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, the Company believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, the Company would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 the Company obtained a waiver from BNDES. See Notes 3 and 20 for further information.

 

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies detailed below have been consistently applied in allthe periods presented in thisthese Consolidated financial statements.Financial Statements by the Company, as well as its subsidiaries.

Use of estimates

(a)

Reporting basis

In preparing theThe financial statements have been prepared based on the historic cost, except for certain financial instruments measured at their fair values, as described in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,the accounting policies in item (b) of the accounting policies below.

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and the exercise of judgment by the Company’s management usesin the application of the Group’s accounting policies. Those areas that involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity or areas where assumptions and estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors, including expected future events, which are considered reasonable and relevant. The use of estimates and assumptions frequently requires judgments related to matters thatsignificant are uncertain with respect to the outcomes of transactions and the amount of assets and liabilities. Actual results of operations and the financial position may differ from these estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of fixed assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, the valuation of derivatives, the valuation of available-for-sale investment, deferred tax assets, valuation of fixed assets, pension plan, income tax uncertainties and contingencies.disclosed in item (c) below.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanyingCompany’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Oi S.A. and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminatedprepared in consolidation. accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) , and the pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective on December 31, 2019, which are the same followed for the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Company accountsis presenting its financial statements under IFRS for investments overSEC reporting purposes after several years of presenting them under accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The accounting differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS and the reconciliation of these accounting polices and practices are presented in Note 34.

Management asserts that all relevant information related to the financial statements, which corresponds to the information it uses while managing the Company, has significant influence but not a controllingbeen disclosed in this financial interest usinginformation.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the equityConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

b)

Significant accounting policies

Consolidation criteria of subsidiaries by the full consolidation method

Full consolidation was prepared in accordance with IFRS 10—Consolidated Financial Statements and incorporates the financial statements of accounting.the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries. The main consolidation procedures are as follows:

Beginning June 2, 2015,

the remainingbalances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses are consolidated, according to their accounting nature;

intragroup assets and liabilities and material revenue and expenses are eliminated;

investments and related interests in the equity of PT Portugal not sold to Altice (Note 1) have been fully consolidated by the Companysubsidiaries are eliminated;

non-controlling interests in each line item of the balance sheet, exceptequity and profit or loss for the year are separately stated; and

exclusive investment funds (Note 8) are consolidated;

The assets and liabilities ofrelated to the operations in Africa and Asia, which are consolidated and stated in a single line item of the balance sheet asheld-for-sale assets held for sale, based on management’sas a result of Management’s expectation and decision of holdingto hold these assets and liabilities for sale.

Oi S.A. In the statement of profit or loss, however, costs/expenses and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

New Accounting Standards

Long-Term Debt and Debt Issuance Costs - In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03), which resulted in the reclassification of debt issuance costs from “Other Assets” to inclusion as a reduction of our reportable “Long-Term Debt” balance on our consolidated balance sheets. Since ASU 2015-03 does not address deferred issuance costs for line-of-credit arrangements, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” (ASU 2015-15), in August 2015. ASU 2015-15 allows a company to defer debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, including arrangements with no outstanding borrowings, classify them as an asset, and amortize them over the term of the arrangements. We elected to adopt ASU 2015-03 early, with full retrospective application as required by the guidance. Adopting ASU 2015-03 resulted in the reclassification of approximately R$473,800 from other assets to loans and financing within the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014.

Deferred Income Taxes and Liabilities - In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (ASU 2015-17), which requires companies report their deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, together as a single noncurrent item on their classified balance sheets. The Company elected to early adopt the new standard for the current reporting period, which is permitted, and applied a retrospective transition method. Adopting ASU 2015-17 resulted in the reclassification of R$1,631,155 from current to noncurrent deferred income tax assets within the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014.

Revenue Recognition - In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (ASU 2014-09) and has since modified the standard with ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date”, ASU 2016-08 “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” and ASU 2016-10 “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. These standards replace existing revenue recognition rules with a comprehensive revenue measurement and recognition standard and expanded disclosure requirements. ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, at which point we plan to adopt the standard. Upon initial evaluation, we believe the key changes in the standard that impact our revenue recognition relate to the allocation of contract revenues between various services and equipment, and the timing in which those revenuesrevenue/gains are recognized. We are still in the process of determining the impact on the timing of revenue recognition and the allocation of revenue to products.

Business Combinations - In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement- Period Adjustments” (ASU 2015-16), which results in the ability to recognize, in current period earnings, any changes in provisional amounts during the measurement period after the closing of an acquisition, instead of restating prior periods for these changes. This standard had no impact on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, or our consolidated operating results and cash flows for the year ended.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Leases (Topic 842) - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases, and makes other conforming amendments to U.S. GAAP. ASU 2016-02 requires, among other changes to the lease accounting guidance, lessees to recognize most leases on-balance sheet via a right of use asset and lease liability, and additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company for annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, permits early adoption, and mandates a modified retrospective transition method. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, but is evaluating whether to early adopt the new standard. The Company will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019, and is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 which makes targeted improvements to the accounting for, and presentation and disclosure of, financial instruments, except those accounts forstated under the equityfull consolidation method or those that result in consolidation. ASU 2016-01 requires that most equity investmentsbecause these operations do not meet the criteria to be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. ASU 2016-01 does not affect the accountingclassified as ‘discontinued operation’, as provided for investments that would otherwise be consolidated or accounted for under the equity method. The new standard also impacts financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The provisions of ASU 2016-01 are effective for the Company for annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019, and is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.by IFRS 5.

Functional and presentation currency

The Company and its subsidiaries operate primarilymainly as telecommunications industry operators in Brazil, Africa, and Asia, and engage in activities typical of this industry. The items included in the financial statements of each group company are measured using the currency of the main economic environment of the respective company’s operationswhere it operates (“functional currency”). The individual and consolidated financial statements are presented in Brazilian reais (R$), which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency.

To define its functional currency, management considered the currency that influences:

the sales prices of its goods and services;

the costs of services and sales;

the cash flows arising from receipts from customers and payments to suppliers;

interest, investments and financing.

Transactions and balances

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Foreign currency-denominated transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the settlement of the transaction and the translation at the exchange rates prevailing at year end,yearend, related foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in the income statement, of profit or loss, except when qualified as hedge accounting and, therefore, deferred in equity as cash flow hedges.

Group companies with a different functional currency

The profit or loss and the financial position of all Group entities, none of which uses a currency from a hyperinflationary economy, whose functional currency is different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

 

assets and liabilities are translating at the rate prevailing at the end of the reporting period;

 

revenue and expenses disclosed in the statement of profit or loss are translated using the average exchange rate;

 

all the resulting foreign exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of equity in other comprehensive income; and

 

goodwill and fair value adjustments, arising from the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing exchange rate.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

As at December 31, 20152019 and 2014,2018, the foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities were translated into Brazilian reais using mainly the following foreign exchange rates:

 

  Closing rate   Average rate   Closing rate   Average rate 

Currency

  2015   2014   2015   2014   2019   2018   2019   2018 

Euro

   4.2504     3.2270     4.2158     3.2525     4.5305    4.4390    4.4159    4.3094 

US dollar

   3.9048     2.6562     3.8711     2.6394     4.0307    3.8748    3.9461    3.6558 

Cabo Verdean escudo

   0.0390     0.0339     0.0298     0.0287  

Cape Verdean escudo

   0.0411    0.0403    0.0401    0.0391 

Sao Tomean dobra

   0.000174     0.000154     0.000132     0.000131     0.000192    0.000185    0.000188    0.000177 

Kenyan shilling

   0.0382     0.0339     0.0293     0.0268     0.0398    0.0381    0.0387    0.0361 

Namibian dollar

   0.2510     0.2606     0.2297     0.2169     0.2878    0.2698    0.2732    0.2764 

Mozambican metical

   0.0832     0.0838     0.0767     0.0742     0.0631    0.0627    0.0627    0.0601 

Angolan kwanza

   0.0084    0.0126    0.0111    0.0147 

Segment informationreporting

The presentation of information relating toabout operating segments is consistentpresented consistently with the internal reportsreport provided to the chief operating decision makerCompany’s main decision-making body, its Board of Directors. Management monitors and tracks performance of each of the Company. TheCompany’s services offerings based on the revenues of those services and the results of segment operations are regularly reviewed in orderon a consolidated basis with regard to make decisions about the allocation of resources to be allocated to assess operationaltheir performance and for strategic decision-making.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

decision-making (Note 28).

Business combinations

The Company uses the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred, and the equity instruments issued. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of assets and liabilities resulting from a contingent consideration contract, where applicable. The identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially measured atas their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company depreciates amounts recognized based on the appreciation of the acquired assets, according to the useful lives of the underlying assets, and tests such assets to determine any asset impairment losses when there is evidence of impairment. Theimpairment; on the other hand, the Company tests goodwill for impairment amounts based on future profitability (goodwill) on an annual basis.

Investment SecuritiesCash and cash equivalents

Investment securities at December 31, 2015Comprise cash and 2014 consistimprest cash fund, banks, and highly liquid short-term investments (usually maturing within less than three months), immediately convertible into a known cash amount, and subject to an immaterial risk of short-term and long-term investments classified as trading and an investment at Unitel classified as available-for-sale. Trading and available-for-sale securitieschange in value, which are recordedstated at fair value. Unrealized holdingvalue at the end of the reporting period and which do not exceed their market value, and whose classification is determined as shown below (Note 8).

Financial assets

Financial assets are classified according to their purpose into: (i) amortized cost; (ii) fair value through other comprehensive income; and (iii) fair value through profit or loss.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company classifies its financial assets into the following measurement categories: (1) assets measured at amortized cost—i.e., financial assets that meet the following conditions: (i) the business model under which financial assets are held to obtain contractual cash flows; and (ii) the contractual terms of the financial asset generate, on specified dates, cash flows that are only payments of principal and interest on the outstanding principal (accounts receivables, loans and cash equivalents). Amortized cost is written down by impairment losses; (2) financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income. Interest income is calculated using the effective interest method, foreign exchange gains and losses, on trading securitiesand impairment are includedrecognized in earnings. Unrealized holding gains andprofit or loss. Other net earnings (losses) are recognized in other comprehensive income. Upon derecognition, accumulated losses net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulatedin other comprehensive income until realized.

A declineare reclassified to profit or loss; and (3) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Net earnings (losses), including interest, are recognized directly in the market value of any available-for-sale below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in an impairment to reduce the carrying amount to fair value. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available information relevant to the collectibility of the security, including past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts when developing estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year-end, forecasted performance of the investee, and the general market condition in the geographic areaprofit or industry the investee operates in.loss.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable from telecommunications services provided are stated at the tariff or service amount on the date they are provided and do not differ from their fair values.

These receivables also include receivables from services provided and not billed by the end of the reporting period and receivables related to handset, SIM cards, and accessories. The loss allowance for doubtful accounts estimatetrade receivables is recognized inmeasured at an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses on the realization of these receivables. The allowance for doubtful accounts estimate is prepared based on historic default rates.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is set up to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notesequal to the Financial Statementslife-time expected credit losses as allowed for by IFRS 9 (Note 9).

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

There are cases of agreements with certain customers to collect past-due receivables, including agreements that allow customers to settle their debts in installments. The actual amounts not received may be different from the allowance recognized, and additional accruals might be required.

Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations

Non-current assets are classified as assets held for sale when their carrying amount is recoverable, principally through a sale, and when such sale is highly probable. These assets are stated at the lower of their carrying valueamount and their fair value less costs to sell. Any impairment loss on a group of assets held for sale is initially allocated to goodwill and, then, to the remaining assets and liabilities on a pro rata basis.

DisposalsA discontinuing operation is a component of an entity or a business unit that representcan be clearly distinguished operationally from the rest of the Company. The classification of a strategic shift that should havediscontinuing operation is made when the operation is sold or will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results qualify as discontinued operations. The results of discontinued operations are reported in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for current and prior periods commencing in the period in which the business meets the criteria of a discontinued operation, and include any gain or loss recognized on closing or adjustment of the carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell.be classified as held for sale (Note 31).

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment isare stated at cost of purchase or construction, less accumulated depreciation. Historical costs include expenses directly attributable to the acquisition of assets. They also include certain costs foron facilities, when it is probable that the future economic benefits related to such costs will flow tointo the Company.Company, and asset dismantlement, removal and restoration costs. The borrowings and financing costs directly attributable to the purchase, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized in the initial cost of such asset. Qualifying assets are those that necessarily require a significant time to be ready for use.

Subsequent costs are added to the carrying amount as appropriate, when, and only when, these assets generate future economic benefits and can be reliably measured. The residual balance of the replaced asset is derecognized. Maintenance and repair costs are recorded in profit or loss as incurred.for the period when they are incurred, and they are capitalized when, and only when, they clearly represent an increase in installed capacity or the useful lives of assets.

Assets under finance leases are recorded in property, plant and equipment at the lower of fair value or the present value of the minimum lease payments, from the initial date of the agreement.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis, based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful livesassets, which are annually reviewed annually by the Company.Company (Note 16).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Intangible assets

Acquired intangible assets with finite useful lives are recognized at cost, less amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is recognized on a straight-line basis over the asset’s estimated useful life. The estimated useful life and method of amortization are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period, and the effect of any changes in estimates is accounted for on a prospective basis. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Software licenses purchased are capitalized based on the costs incurred to purchase the software and make it ready for use.

Software maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Long-lived assetsRegulatory licenses related to the merged capital gains are amortized over the STFC concession period. The other regulatory licenses for the operation of the mobile telephony services are recognized at cost of acquisition and amortized over the effective period of the related licenses (Note 17).

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization,Impairment of non-financial asset

Assets are reviewedtested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts might be impaired. Impairment losses, if any, are recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable value. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, an appropriate valuation model is used.

For impairment test purposes, assets are grouped into the smallest identifiable group for which there is a cash-generating unit (CGU), which is identified pursuant to the operating segment (Note 28).

For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may not be recoverable.no longer exist or may have decreased. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment,such indication exists, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expectedmakes an estimate of recoverable amount. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to be generated bydetermine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. Ifis the case, the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is notincreased to its recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent thatamount.

That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair valuethat would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market valuesrecognized in profit or loss. The following criteria are also applied in assessing impairment of specific assets.

These calculations required the use of judgments and third-party independent appraisals,assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as considered necessary.

Derivative financial instrumentseconomic trends, industry trends and hedging activities

Derivative financial instruments are contracted to mitigate exposure to market risks arising frominterest rates, changes in exchange rates on foreign currency-denominated debtsbusiness strategies, and short-term investments held abroad, and also from changes in earnings.

Derivatives are initially recognized at cost at the inception of the derivative contract and are subsequently measured at fair value based on future cash flow estimates associated to the respective instrument. Changes in the fair value of any of these derivatives are recorded directly in earnings.

The Company uses hedge accounting for derivative financial instruments. The purpose of this practice is to reduce the volatility of the gains or losses recognized due to changes in the fair valuestype of these derivativeservices and products provided by the Company to the market. The use of different assumptions can significantly change the financial instruments. Derivativeinformation.

In July 2019, the Company disclosed its Strategic Plan, focused on improving operating and financial instrumentsperformance, using a sustainable business model that qualify for hedge accounting are submitted to periodic prospective and retrospective effectiveness tests usingaims at maximizing the dollar offset method.

Derivative instruments contracted and designated as hedging instruments are formally identified through initial designation documentation. Derivative financial instruments classified as cash flows hedges were designated for hedge accounting.

The effective portion, is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income, net of taxes, and is reclassified to financial income (expenses)Company’s value in the same period or periods during whichcontext of judicial reorganization.

Based on the hedge transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion, measured afterStrategic Plan, the quarterly effectiveness tests, is recognized in financial income (expenses)Company conducted an impairment test of its long-lived assets and identified an impairment loss of R$2,111 million driven basically by the following: (i) revision of said plan; and (ii) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the same period it occurs.

Changesresidential market, intensifying the drop in the fair values of derivative financial instruments that are not designated for purposes of hedge accounting are recognized as financial income or expenses in profit or loss in the period they occur.

The hedge relationship expiresrevenues from fixed telephony and the designation is removed when:DTH services.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

The Company used the cash flow forecasts described in the Strategic Plan. These forecasts cover aten-year period and take into consideration the average useful lives of the assets, the cash flow period of the judicial reorganization plan, and are consistent with previous years. The discount rate used in the cash flows corresponds to the weighted average cost of capital of 10.94% (11.55% in 2018), which is reviewed at least annually by the Company.

Pursuant to IAS 36, an impairment loss is to be allocated to write down the carrying amount of the cash generating unit’s assets, which is allocated to the regulatory licenses (Notes 5 and 17).

Adjustment to present value

The Company measures its financial assets and financial liabilities to identify instances of applicability of the discount to present value which represents one of the appropriate method to calculate the fair value for some assets and liabilities transactions. For recognition purposes, the measurement of an asset/liability to present value is calculated taking into consideration the contractual cash flows and stated interest rates, and the interest rate of liabilities in certain cases.

Generally, when applicable, the discount rate used is the average return rate on investments for financial assets or interest charged on Company borrowings for financial liabilities. The balancing item is the asset or liability that has originated the financial instrument, when applicable, and the deemed borrowing costs are allocated to the Company’s profits over the transaction term.

Under the terms and conditions of the JRP, certain balances of debt, trade payables and contingencies involving ANATEL (Note 18) were adjusted to fair value on the date of the novation of prepetition liabilities, pursuant to the requirements of IFRS 9, equivalent to the present value at the time, calculated based on an internal valuation that took into consideration the cash flows of these liabilities and assumptions related to the discount rates, consistent with the maturity and currency of each financial liability.

The present value of the lease agreements is measured by discounting fixed future payment flows, which do not take into account projected inflation, using the incremental interest rate, according to market conditions, and is estimated using the Company-specific risk spread.

Additionally, assets acquired under lease agreements, as well as unrecognized revenue generated by the assignment of communication towers are adjusted to present value.

Impairment of financial assets

For financial assets measured at amortized cost, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is considered impaired when there is objective evidence, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, and that loss event had an impact on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.

In the case of equity investments classified as available for sale, a significant or prolonged decline in their fair value below cost is also objective evidence of impairment.

 

(i)The derivative contract is settled, terminated or settled, or if the Company or its subsidiary TMAR voluntarily removes the designation. If the hedged item continues to exist, the balances accumulated in other comprehensive income related to the changes in the fair value of the derivative are transferred to profit or loss for the year in which the hedged interest expenses and foreign exchange fluctuations are allocated.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(ii)The debt was either prepaid or settled. In this case, the balance accumulated in other comprehensive income is immediately transferred to financial income or expenses in profit or loss for the year the designation is terminated.

Borrowings and financing

Borrowings and financing are stated at amortized cost, plus monetary correction or foreign exchange differences and interest incurred through the end of the reporting period (Note 20).

On the restructuring/novation date of financial liabilities subject to judicial reorganization, the Company recognized loan borrowing and financing commitments at fair value pursuant to the requirements of IFRS 9. The required informationfair value at the restructuring date of each financial liability was calculated based on derivative instrumentsan internal valuation that took into consideration the cash flows from these liabilities and assumptions related to the discount rates, consistent with the maturity and the effectscurrency of each financial liability.

Transaction costs incurred are measured at amortized cost and recognized in liabilities, as a reduction to the balance of borrowings and financing, and are expensed over the relevant agreement term.

Leases

The Company recognizes aright-to-use asset and a lease liability in its balance sheet with respect to the leased assets. Theright-to-use asset is measured at cost, which consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, plus initial direct costs incurred, estimated costs to decommission and remove the asset at the end of the lease, other payments made before the lease commencement date, and calculated at present value, discounted by the incremental lending rate. The discount rates used by the Company were obtained in accordance with market conditions, estimated using the Company-specific risk spread.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments

Debt or equity instruments issued the Company and its subsidiaries are described in Note 3.classified as financial liabilities or equity instruments, according to the contractual substance of the transaction.

ContingenciesProvisions

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessment, litigation, fines and penalties are recorded when itThe amount recognized as provision is probable that the liability has been incurred andbest estimate of the amount can be reasonably estimated,disbursement required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, based on the opinion of the management and itsin-house and outside legal counsel, and the amounts are recognized based on the cost of the expected outcome of ongoing lawsuits (Note 24).

For measuring the amount of the provisions to be recognized, the Company basically adopts two methodologies: (i) the statistical measurement model and (ii) the individual measurement model. In order to choose the methodology to be used, the Company takes into consideration, among other criteria, the number of lawsuits, the lawsuit amount, the estimated amount of a possible payment, and the nature of the lawsuit.

The statistical measurement model is usually used in situations where there are (i) a significant volume of administrative or judicial proceedings with similar nature; (ii) individually the proceedings have a low amounts; and (iii) it is possible to determine a statistical model based on historic information about the rates of unfavorable sentences, the amount of the payments, and the changes in the number of proceedings. Usually in this model the Company uses the calculation of the expected amount, as prescribed by paragraph 39 of IAS 37, and requests opinions from outside specialists to assess the likelihood of a loss. The main contingencies measured under this model are labor and civil (PEX and small claims) lawsuits.

The individual measurement model is usually used in situations where (i) the proceeding involves a high amount; (ii) it is reasonably possible to make an individual assessment of likelihood that a disbursement will be required; and (iii) there is no similarity in the nature of the proceedings. In this model the Company uses opinions from outside specialists in the involved areas to assess the likelihood of a loss. The main contingencies measured under this model are tax and strategic civil proceedings.

The increase in the obligation as a result of the passage of time is recognized as financial expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Onerous obligation

The Company recognizes a present obligation when events render the contracting of services onerous.

A contract becomes onerous when: (i) the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received over the contract period; and (ii) the costs are unavoidable.

The Company measures the onerous obligation according to the lower net cost of fulfilling the contract, which is determined based on the lower of: (i) the cost of fulfilling the contract or (ii) the cost of any compensation or penalties derived from the noncompliance of the contract.

The base assumptions used to calculate the onerous obligation must be periodically reviewed and measured whenever there are significant changes of these assumptions.

Employee benefits

Pension plans: private pension plans and other postretirement plansbenefits sponsored by the Company and its subsidiaries for the benefit of their employees are managed by two foundations. Contributions are determined based on actuarial calculations, when applicable, and charged to profit or loss on the accrual basis (Note 27).

The Company and its subsidiaries have defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The Company also sponsors a defined benefit health care plan for retirees and employees.

In the defined contribution plan, the sponsor makes fixed contributions to a fund managed by a separate entity. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expenses as incurred. The sponsor does not have the legal or constructive obligation of making additional contributions, in the event the fund lacks sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits related to the services provided in the current year and prior years.

ForThe defined benefit is annually calculated by independent actuaries, who use the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows, using the projected inflation rate plus long-term interest. The obligation recognized in the balance sheet as regards the defined benefit pension plans presenting a deficit, corresponds to the present value of the benefits defined at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of the plan’s assets.

The actuarial gains and losses resulting from the changes in the actuarial valuations of the pension plans, whose actuarial obligations or actuarial assets are recorded by the Company, records annual amounts relating to its pension and postretirement plans based on calculations that incorporate various actuarial and other assumptions, including discount rates, mortality, assumed rates of return, compensation increases, turnover rates and healthcare cost trend rates. The Company reviews its assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is appropriate to do so. The effect of modifications to those assumptions is recordedare fully recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, and amortized to net periodic cost over future periods using the corridor method. The Company believes that the assumptions utilized in recording its obligations under its plans are reasonable based on its experience and market conditions.equity (Note 26).

The Company recognizes the over or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liabilityrecognized in its balance sheet andcorresponds to recognizes changesthe present value of available economic benefits, consisting of refunds or reductions in that funded status infuture contributions to the plan.

Employee profit sharing: the provision for the employee profit sharing plan is accounted on an accrual basis, which is paid by April of the year following the recognition of the provision, takes into consideration a set of operating and financial goals approved with the employees’ labor union, under a specific collective labor agreement. This cost is recognized annually in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.personnel expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The Company is not required to record actuarial calculations for multi-employer pension plans such as the PBS-A and contributions to such plans are recorded on an accrual basis. Refunds from these plans are recorded only upon the cash receipt.

Revenue recognition

Revenues correspond basically to the amount of the payments received or receivable from sales of services in the regular course of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ activities.

Service revenueRevenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company applied the judgments that significantly affect the determined amount and the recognition timing of the revenue from a contract with a customer, taking into account the five-step recognition model: (i) identify the contract; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition da revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Residential Services are composed, basically, of local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, are provided.broadband services and Pay-TV. Local and long distance calls are charged based on time measurement according to the legislation in effect. TheBoth of the services charged based on monthly fixed amounts are calculated and recorded on a straight-line basis. Prepaidrecognized as revenue when the services are provided.

Personal Mobility Services are composed of mobile telephony services, interconnection and handsets, SIM cards and other accessories. Post-paid plan is recognized as revenue when service is provided. Prepaid service is first recognized as unearned revenues and recognition occurs by customer’s usage. Interconnection service is provided upon request of any other telecommunication collective service provider and are charged according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL, and recognized inas revenue as services are used by customers.

Revenue from saleswhen the service is provided. Sales of handsets and accessories isare recognized when these items are delivered and accepted by the customers. Discounts on

SMEs/Corporate Services are composed, basically, of fixed-line and mobile voice, data telecommunications services, providedbroadband services and sales of cell phonesPay-TV services, recognized as revenue when the services are provided.

Products and accessoriesservices are taken into consideration in the recognition of the related revenue.sold separately or bundled packages. Revenues involving transactions with multiple elements are identified in relation torecognized when each one of their componentsperformance obligation is identified and the applicable criteria is applied.

Initial installation rates are not separately identifiable performance obligations and are recognized in the revenue pursuant to the period the services are used by the customers.

Revenue arising from the receipt of trade receivables that had already been written off as losses but were subsequently recovered and received in the collection process, are recognized in profit or loss, in line item ‘Other operating income’.

Variable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained to revenue recognition criteria are applied on an individual basis. Revenueuntil it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not recognized when there is significant uncertainty as to its realization.occur (Notes 4 and 5).

Expense recognition

Expenses are recognized on anthe accrual basis, considering their relation with revenue realization. Prepaid expenses attributable to future years are deferred over the related periods. The incremental costs to obtain a contract with a customer (contract compliance costs), consisting basically of sales commissions, are recognized in profit or loss on a systematic basis, consistent with the transfer of goods and services to the customers (Note 13).

Financial income and expenses

Financial income is recognized on an accrual basis and comprises interest on receivables settled after the due date, gains on short-term investments and gains on derivative instruments. Financial expenses representconsist primarily of interest effectively incurred, adjustments to present value, and other charges on borrowings, financing, and financial derivative contracts,contracts. They also include banking fees and costs, financial intermediation costs on the collection of trade receivables, and other financial transactions.transactions (Notes 5 and 6).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Current and deferred income tax and social contribution

Income taxes

Income taxestax and social contribution are recorded under the asset and liability method. Deferred taxes are recognized foron an accrual basis. Taxes attributed to temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards are recorded in assets or liabilities, as applicable.applicable, only under the assumption of future realization or payment. The Company recognizesprepares technical studies that consider the effectfuture generation of taxable income, based on management expectations, considering the continuity of the companies as going concerns. The Company writes down the carrying amount of deferred tax positions only if those positionsassets to the extent it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow the utilization of all or part of the deferred tax assets.

Any write-down of deferred tax assets is reversed when it is probable that sufficient taxable income will be available. The technical studies are more likely than notupdated annually, approved by the Board of being sustained. Recognized incomeDirectors and reviewed by the Supervisory Board, and the tax positionscredits are adjusted based on the results of these reviews. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured atusing the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected intax rates applicable for the period in which the changeliability is expected to be settled or the asset is expected to be realized, based on the tax rates set forth in judgment occurs.the tax law prevailing at the end of each reporting period, or when new legislation has been substantially enacted. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at the end of each reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of these assets and liabilities (Note 7).

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share are calculated through profit or loss for the year attributable to the owners of the Company, divided by the weighted average number of common and preferred shares outstanding in the year. Diluted earnings per share are calculated using said weighted average number of outstanding shares adjusted by potentially dilutive instruments convertible into shares in the reporting years, pursuant to IAS 33. (Note 26 (f).)

(c)

Estimates and critical accounting judgments

The Company’s management uses estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors, including expected future events, which are considered reasonable and relevant, and also requires judgments related to these matters. Actual results of operations and the financial position may differ from these estimates. The estimates that represent a significant risk of causing material adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are as follows:

Revenue recognition and accounts receivables

The companyCompany’s revenue recognition policy is significant as it is a material component of operating results. Determining the amount and its subsidiaries file income tax returnsthe timing of revenue recognition by Management, collection ability, and the rights to receive certain network usage revenue is based on judgment related to the nature of the tariff collected for the services provided, the price of certain products, and the right to collect this revenue. If changes in all jurisdictionsconditions cause management to conclude that such criteria are not met in which they do business (Brazilcertain operations, the amount of trade receivables might be affected. In addition, the Company depends on guidelines to measure certain revenue set by ANATEL (Brazilian telecommunications industry regulator).

Expected credit losses on trade receivables

The expected credit losses on trade receivables are determined to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from defaulting customers. The estimate of expected credit loss on trade receivables is recognized in an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses on the only major tax jurisdiction). In Brazil, income tax returnsrealization of these receivables and is prepared based on historical default rates and projections of future conditions that impact collections.

There are subjectcases of agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due receivables, including agreements that allow customers to settle their debts in installments. The actual amounts not received may be different from the allowance recognized, and additional accruals might be required.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

reviewDepreciation and adjustmentamortization of assets with finite useful lives

Property, plant and equipment items and intangible assets with finite useful lives are depreciated and amortized, respectively, on a straight-line basis, over the useful lives of the related asset. The depreciation and amortization rates of the most significant assets are shown in Notes 16 and 17, respectively.

The useful lives of certain assets may vary as they are used in the fixed-line or mobile telephony segments. The Company reviews the useful lives of assets annually.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The recoverable amounts of long-lived assets are determined by comparing the calculations of their value in use and their sales prices. These calculations required the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold by the tax authorities during a period of five calendar years. Positions challenged by the taxing authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. All audit periods prior to 2010 are closed for federal examination purposes.

As of December 31, 2015 the company has no unrecognized tax benefits, nor any interest and penalties thereon.    Interest and penalties on an underpayment of income taxes are recognized as part of interest expense and other expenses, respectively.

3.FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK ANALYSIS

3.1.Overview

The table below summarizes our financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value at December 31, 2015 and 2014.

   Accounting
measurement
  2015   2014 
    Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Assets

          

Cash and banks

  Fair value   1,111,840     1,111,840     532,285     532,285  

Cash equivalents

  Fair value   13,786,223     13,786,223     1,916,921     1,916,921  

Short-term investments

  Fair value   1,927,686     1,927,686     282,700     282,700  

Derivative financial instruments

  Fair value   7,386,703     7,386,703     3,221,481     3,221,481  

Accounts receivable (i)

  Amortized cost   8,379,719     8,379,719     7,455,687     7,455,687  

Held-for-sale assets (Note 26)

          

Available-for-sale financial asset

  Fair value   3,541,314     3,541,314     4,284,416     4,284,416  

Dividends receivable

  Amortized cost   2,042,191     2,042,191     1,261,826     1,261,826  

Liabilities

          

Trade payables (i)

  Amortized cost   5,004,833     5,004,833     4,331,286     4,331,286  

Borrowings and financing

          

Borrowings and financing (ii)

  Amortized cost   17,049,280     17,049,280     15,335,155     15,335,155  

Debentures

  Amortized cost   4,138,025     4,128,539     7,776,876     7,513,867  

Senior notes

  Amortized cost   38,670,111     22,159,838     12,737,364     12,199,092  

Derivative financial instruments

  Fair value   2,510,343     2,510,343     666,922     666,922  

Dividends and interest on capital

  Amortized cost   96,433     96,433     185,138     185,138  

Licenses and concessions payable (iii)

  Amortized cost   918,537     918,537     1,361,940     1,361,940  

Tax refinancing program (iii)

  Amortized cost   795,088     795,088     990,230     990,230  

Other payables (payable for the acquisition of equity interest) (iii)

  Amortized cost   382,230     382,230     408,978     408,978  

(i)The balances of accounts receivables and trade payables have near terms and, therefore, they are not adjusted to fair value.
(ii)

Part of this balance of borrowings and financing with the BNDES and export credit agencies correspond to exclusive markets and, therefore, the fair values of these instruments is similar to

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

NotesCompany to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

their carrying amounts. A portion of the balance of borrowings and financing refers to the bonds issued in the international market, for which is there is a secondary market, and their fair values are different from their carrying amounts.
(iii)The licenses and concessions payable, the tax refinancing program, and other obligations (payable for the acquisition of equity interest) are stated at the amounts that these obligations are expected to be settled and are not adjusted to fair value.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company and its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation. The interpretation of market inputs for the selection of such techniques requires considerable judgment and the preparation of estimates to obtain an amount considered appropriate for each situation. Accordingly, the estimates presented may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in an active market. The use of different assumptions formay significantly change our financial statements.

For impairment assessment purposes of the Cash-generating Unit (CGU), the Company defined the value in use of its assets.

In measuring the value in use, the Company based its cash flow projections according to the aforementioned Strategic Plan, approved by Management and already disclosed to the market in a material fact notice. These forecasts cover aten-year period, taking into account the useful lives of the assets and are consistent with prior years’ cash flows. The discount rate used on the cash flows corresponds to a weighted average cost of capital of 10.94% (11.55% in 2018), which is reviewed by the Company at least annually.

Pursuant to IAS 36, an impairment loss is allocated to reduce the carrying amount of the assets of a cash-generating unit, firstly to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill based on expected future profitability and, subsequently, the other assets of the cash-generating unit proportionately to the carrying amount of asset of the cash-generating units. The impairment loss was fully allocated to the carrying value of regulatory licenses (Notes 5 and 17).

Leases

The assumptions related to the appropriated discount rates used in the fair value calculation of the fairpresent value of the lease payments are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the Company’s financial performance. The use of different assumptions to measure the present value of our leases may have a material impact on the amounts.estimated present value of theright-of-use asset and the lease liability in the balance sheet.

Fair value of financial liabilities

(a)Derivative financial instruments

The methodassumptions on the discount rates used for calculatingin the fair value calculation of our financial liabilities are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the Company’s financial performance. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value of derivativethe financial instruments wasliabilities can have a material impact on the future cash flows associated to each instrument contracted, discounted at market rates prevailing at December 31, 2015.

(b)Non-derivative financial instruments measured at fair value

Theestimated fair value of securities tradedthese financial liabilities and the amounts recognized as borrowings and financing in active markets is equivalentthe balance sheet, as well as the amounts recognized in profit or loss.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the amountConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Provisions

Pursuant IAS 37, the Company recognized provisions for contingencies basically originated at the juridical and administrative levels, with labor, tax, and civil nature, as detailed in Note 24.

Depending on the nature of the last closing quotation availablecontingency, the Company’s management uses the statistical measurement or the individual measurement methodology to calculate provisions for contingencies. In any of these methodologies, the Company uses a set of assumptions, information, an internal and external risk assessment, and statistical models that management considers to be appropriate, including the successful implementation of the Judicial Reorganization Plan; however, it is possible that these change in the future, which could result in change in the future provisions for losses.

Deferred income tax and social contribution

The Company recognizes and settles taxes on income based on the results of operations determined in accordance with the Brazilian corporate law, taking into consideration the provisions of the tax law, which are materially different from the amounts calculated for IFRS purposes. Pursuant to IAS 12, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the carrying amounts and the taxable bases of the assets and liabilities.

The Company regularly tests deferred tax assets for impairment and recognizes an allowance for impairment losses when it is probable that these assets may not be realized, based on the history of taxable income, the projection of future taxable income, and the time estimated for the reversal of existing temporary differences. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in the recognition of an allowance for impairment losses for the entire or a significant portion of the deferred tax assets.

Employee benefits

The actuarial valuation is based on assumptions and estimates related to interest rates, return on investments, inflation rates for future periods, mortality indices, and an employment level projection related the pension fund benefit liabilities. The accuracy of these assumptions and estimates will determine the creation of sufficient reserves for the costs of accumulated pensions and healthcare plans, and the amount to be disbursed annually on pension benefits.

These assumptions and estimates are subject to significant fluctuations due to different internal and external factors, such as economic trends, social indicators, and our capacity to create new jobs and retain our employees. All assumptions are reviewed at the end of the reporting period, multipliedperiod. If these assumptions and estimates are not accurate, there may be the need to revise the reserves for pension benefits, which could significantly impact Company results.

(d)

New and revised standards and interpretations

(d.1)

New standards adopted as at January 1, 2019

New and revised standards

Effective beginning on or after:

Annual improvements to IFRSs2015-2017 CycleJanuary 1, 2019
IFRS 16LeasesJanuary 1, 2019
IFRIC 23Uncertainty over Income Tax TreatmentsJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 19Change, reduction, or settlement of defined benefit plansJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IFRS 9Prepayment Features with Negative CompensationJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 28Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint VenturesJanuary 1, 2019

Among the standards, changes, and interpretations referred to above, on IFRS 16 had an impact on the Company and subsidiaries’ financial position as from January 1, 2018, as detailed below.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

IFRS 16—Leases

IFRS 16—Leases establishes the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosures, and requires that lessees account for all the leases under a single model in the balance sheet. The standard includes two recognition exemptions for lessees: leases of low value assets (for example, personal computers) and short-term leases (i.e., with a lease tem of twelve months or less). At the lease commencement date, the lessee recognizes a liability related to the lease payments (i.e., a lease liability) and a lease asset that represents the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term (i.e., aright-of-use asset). The lessees are required to separately recognize an interest expense on the lease liability and a depreciation expense on theright-of-use asset. The lessees shall also revalue the lease liability should certain events occur (for example, any change in the lease term, a change in the future lease payments as a result of a change in the index or rate used to determine such payments). As a rule, the lessee recognizes the revised amount of the lease liability as an adjustment to theright-of-use asset.

Transition

The Company adopted IFRS 16 pursuant to the modified retrospective approach (i.e., beginning January 1, 2019, taking into account theright-of-use equal to the lease liability upon the first-time adoption), without any restatement of comparative information. The Company elected to apply the standard to agreements that were identified as leases pursuant to the previous standard. As a result, the Company did not apply the standard to agreements that have not previously been identified as containing a lease by applying IAS 17 and IFRIC 4, and excluded lease agreements maturing in the next twelve months, without probable renewal intention, in addition to applying a single discount rate to leases with similar characteristics and excluding to direct initial costs in the measurement of theright-of-use.

Expedients

The Company elected to use the exemptions proposed by the numberstandard on short-term agreements (i.e., that will be end within 12 months from the commencement date), lease agreements for which there is an underlying low value asset.

Furthermore, as part of outstanding securities.the initial application of the standard, the Group has chosen to apply the following expedients: (a) retain the definition and/or assessment of whether an arrangement is a lease in accordance with current guidance with respect to agreements that exist at the date of initial implementation; (b) apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics; (c) exclude initial direct costs from measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application; (d) use hindsight when determining the lease term if the contract includes an extension or termination option; and (e) assess whether a contract is onerous in accordance with IAS 37 immediately before the date of initial implementation instead of assessing impairment of right-of-use assets.

ForImpacts

The impacts refer basically to the remaining contracts,lease agreements of towers, properties, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces) and as described in Notes 16 and 22.

Upon the initial adoption of IFRS 16, the Company carries outrecognized aright-of-use asset and a lease liability in balance sheet. Theright-of-use asset is measured at cost, which consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, any initial direct costs incurred by the Company, an analysis comparingestimate of any costs to disassemble and remove the current contractual terms and conditions with the terms and conditions effective for the contract when they were originated. When terms and conditions are dissimilar, fair value is calculated by discounting future cash flows at the market rates prevailingasset at the end of the period,lease, and when similar, fair value is similarany lease payments made before the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received), calculated at present value.

The Company depreciates theright-of-use assets on a straight-line basis from the commencement of the lease to the carrying amounttermination of the lease.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company also assesses impairment when such indicators exist, taking into account the concept of forming asset groups for impairment purposes.

At the commencement date, the Company measured the lease liability at the present value of the consideration paid or payable, discounted using the Company’s incremental lending rate.

The lease payments included in the lease liability measurement consist of fixed payments and variable payments based on either an index or a rate.

After the reporting date.initial measurement, the liability will be written down by the payments made and increased by the interest incurred. If necessary, the liability is recalculated to reflect any remeasurement or change, or if there are changes in the substance of the fixed payments.

When there is a significant contractual change, a lease liability is remeasured and the corresponding adjustment is reflected in theright-of-use asset, or in profit or loss, if theright-of-use asset is already written down to nil.

The Company elected to use the expedients proposed by the standard for lease agreements, for short-term and low value contracts. Accordingly, instead of recognizing aright-of-use asset and a lease liability, these are recognized as an expense in profit or loss over the lease period.

The Company individually measured any new agreement entered into after January 1, 2019 if such agreement contained a lease. A lease is defined as an “a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.”

To apply this definition the Company assessed whether a contract meets the three key characteristics:

The agreement contains an identified asset, which is explicitly identified in the agreement or implicitly specified to be identified at the time that the asset is made available to the Company;

The Company has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the period of use, considering its rights within the scope set out in the agreement; and

The Company has the right to direct the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use the and right to direct “how and for what purpose” the asset is used throughout the period of use.

The Company recognizes the impacts of temporary differences in deferred income tax and social contribution arising from the new standard IFRS 16.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company adopted IFRS 16, taking into account the modified retrospective application permitted by the standards. Accordingly, we present below the results for the years period ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, less the effects recognized as a result of this application.

   Balance at
December 31, 2019

(with IFRS 16)
  IFRS 16
adjustments
  Balance at
December 31, 2019

(w/o IFRS 16)
  Balance at
December 31, 2018
 

Net operating revenue

   20,136,183    20,136,183   22,060,014 

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,314,814  (589,861  (15,904,675  (16,179,100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit (loss)

   4,821,369   (589,861  4,231,508   5,880,914 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (expenses)

     

Share of results of investees

   (5,174   (5,174  (13,492

Selling expenses

   (3,547,684  (7,516  (3,555,200  (3,853,002

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782,300  (5,810  (2,788,110  (2,738,718

Other operating income

   4,527,710    4,527,710   2,204,134 

Other operating expenses

   (5,991,291   (5,991,291  (6,748,094
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (7,798,739  (13,326  (7,812,065  (11,149,172
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

   (2,977,370  (603,187  (3,580,557  (5,268,258

Financial income

   2,662,463    2,662,463   30,950,461 

Financial expenses

   (8,772,181  948,973   (7,823,208  (4,341,595
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses)

   (6,109,718  948,973   (5,160,745  26,608,866 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pre-tax profit (loss)

   (9,087,088  345,786   (8,741,302  21,340,608 

Income tax and social contribution

     

Current

   (77,060   (77,060  115,706 

Deferred

   69,041    69,041   3,159,241 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

   (9,095,107  345,786   (8,749,321  24,615,555 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IFRIC 23—Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments

Applies to taxes within the scope of IAS 12, which governs situations when there is uncertainty over the tax treatment adopted by the Company with respect to: (i) whether an entity should assess uncertain tax treatments separately; (ii) what estimates an entity should make about the examination of tax treatments by tax authorities, (iii) how an entity determines taxable income or tax loss, tax bases, unutilized tax loss carryforwards, and untimely tax credits; and (iv) how an entity considers changes in facts and circumstances.

The Company, together with its legal advisors, reviewed this matter and concluded that there is no significant impact to the Company’s financial statements.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(c)(d.2)

New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

The new and revised standards and interpretations issued by the IASB that are effective in future reporting periods and that the Company decided not to early adopt are the following, effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020:

New and revised standards

Effective beginning on or after:

IAS 1

Presentation of Financial StatementsJanuary 1, 2020

IAS 8

Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors (Amendment—Definition of material)January 1, 2020

IFRS 3

Business Combinations (Revised—definition of business)

Conceptual framework revised for financial reports

January 1, 2020

The Company is assessing the impact of these changes on the accounting standards.

3.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK ANALYSIS

3.1.

Fair value measurement hierarchy

FairIFRS 13 defines fair value isas the price for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties, in an arm’s length transaction on measurement date. The standard clarifies that the fair value ismust be based on the assumptions that market participants would consider in pricing an asset or a liability, and in the establishmentestablishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to build such assumptions. The fair value measurement hierarchy attaches more importance to available market inputs (i.e., observable data) and a less weight to inputs based on data without transparency (i.e., unobservable data). Additionally, the Company considersstandard requires that an entity consider all nonperformance risk aspects, including the entity’s credit, when measuring the fair value of a liability.

Oi S.A.IFRS 7 establishes a three-level hierarchy to measure and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

disclose fair value. The classification of an instrument in the fair value measurement hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input significant for its measurement. We present below a description of the three-level hierarchy:

Level 1—inputs consist of prices quoted (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to which the entity has access on measurement date;

Level 2—inputs are different from prices quoted in active markets used in Level 1 and consist of directly or indirectly observable inputs for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability or that can support the observed market inputs by correlation or otherwise for substantially the entire asset or liability.

Level 3—inputs used to measure an asset or liability are not based on observable market variables. These inputs represent management’s best estimates and are generally measured using pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar methodologies that require significant judgment or estimate.

There were no transfers between levels between December 31, 2015The Company and December 31, 2014.its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at their market or actual realizable values (fair value) using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation. The interpretation of market inputs for the selection of such techniques requires considerable judgment and the preparation of estimates to obtain an amount considered appropriate for each situation. Accordingly, the estimates presented may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in an active market. The use of different assumptions for the calculation of the fair value may have a material impact on the amounts obtained.

 

   Fair value
measurement
hierarchy
  Fair value
2015
   Fair value
2014
 
      

Assets

      

Cash and banks

  Level 1   1,111,840     532,285  

Cash equivalents

  Level 2   13,786,223     1,916,921  

Short-term investments

  Level 2   1,927,686     282,700  

Derivative financial instruments

  Level 2   7,386,703     3,221,481  

Available-for-sale financial asset (Note 26)

  Level 3   3,541,314     4,284,416  

Liabilities

      

Derivative financial instruments

  Level 2   2,510,343     666,922  

3.2.Measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities at amortized cost

The fair value of the financial instruments mentioned below are substantially close to its carrying amounts due to the following reasons:

Accounts receivables: near-term maturity of bills.

Trade payables, dividends and interests on capital: all obligations are due to be settled in the short term.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

As a result of the implementation of the measures approved on the Plan ratified on January 8, 2018 and the related accounting recognition in calendar year 2018, some financial liabilities classified at amortized cost were remeasured at their fair values as at the date of the novation of these financial liabilities and recognized at amortized cost in the subsequent measurement, pursuant to the accounting guidance of IFRS 9.

The carrying amounts and the estimated fair values of our main financial assets and financial liabilities as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are summarized as follows:

 

Borrowings and financing: all transactions are adjusted for inflation based on contractual indices.

Assets

  Accounting
measurement
   2019   2018 
  Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Cash and banks

   Fair value    575,863    575,863    287,491    287,491 

Cash equivalents

   Fair value    1,506,082    1,506,082    4,097,838    4,097,838 

Cash investments

   Fair value    217,792    217,792    238,962    238,962 

Accounts receivable (i)

   Amortized cost    6,334,526    6,334,526    6,516,555    6,516,555 

Dividends and interest on capital

   Amortized cost    426    426     

Financial asset at fair value

   Fair value    40,689    40,689     

Held-for-sale assets

          

Held-for-sale financial asset (Note 31)

   Fair value    1,474,699    1,474,699    1,843,778    1,843,778 

Dividends receivable (Note 31)

   Amortized cost    2,435,014    2,435,014    2,566,935    2,566,935 
          

Liabilities

                    

Trade payables (i)

   Amortized cost    8,887,367    8,887,367    8,818,870    8,818,870 

Derivative financial instruments

   Fair value    1,152    1,152     

Borrowings and financing (ii)

          

Borrowings and financing

   Amortized cost    8,354,777    8,354,777    7,140,960    7,140,960 

Public debentures

   Amortized cost    3,652,353    3,652,353    3,103,106    3,103,106 

Senior Notes

   Amortized cost    6,219,619    6,565,782    6,205,840    6,937,764 

Dividends and interest on capital

   Amortized cost    5,731    5,731    6,168    6,168 

Licenses and concessions payable (iii)

   Amortized cost    58,582    58,582    85,619    85,619 

Tax refinancing program (iii)

   Amortized cost    417,503    417,503    553,206    553,206 

Leases payable (iv)

   Amortized cost��   8,150,026    8,150,026     

Licenses and concessions payable, tax refinancing program and other payables (payable forFor the acquisitionclosing of equity interests): all payables are adjusted for inflation based on the contractual indices.
year ended December 31, 2019:

 

3.3.(i)

The balances of accounts receivables have near terms and, therefore, they are not adjusted to fair value. The balances of trade receivables, subject to the judicial reorganization, were adjusted to their fair value, at the date of the novation of the liabilities and are represented by the amounts that are expected that the obligations are discharged (Note 18).

(ii)

The balance of the borrowings and financing with the BNDES, Local Banks, and ECAs correspond to exclusive markets, and the fair value of these instruments is similar to their carrying amounts. The balances of borrowings and financing refers to the bonds issued in the international market, for which is there is a secondary market, and their fair values differ from their carrying amounts.

(iii)

The licenses and concessions payable and the tax refinancing program are stated at the amounts that these obligations are expected to be discharged and are not adjusted to fair value.

(iv)

The leases payable are represented by the amounts that the obligations are expected to be settled, adjusted at present value.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The levels of the financial assets, cash and cash equivalents and cash investments,held-for-sale assets, and derivative financial instruments at fair value as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

   Fair value
measurement
hierarchy
  Fair value 
  2019   2018 

Assets

      

Cash and banks

  Level 1   575,863    287,491 

Cash equivalents

  Level 1   1,506,082    4,097,838 

Cash investments

  Level 1   217,792    238,962 

Held-for-sale financial asset

  Level 3   1,474,699    1,843,778 

Liabilities

      

Derivative financial instruments

  Level 2   1,152   

There were no transfers between levels in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Company and its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at their market or actual realizable values (fair value) using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation, as follows:

(a)

Cash, cash equivalents and cash investments

Foreign currency-denominated cash equivalents and cash investments are basically kept in checking deposits denominated in euro and US dollars and, to a lesser extent, in euros.

The fair value of securities traded in active markets is equivalent to the amount of the last closing quotation available at the end of the year, multiplied by the number of outstanding securities.

For the remaining contracts, the Company carries out an analysis comparing the current contractual terms and conditions with the terms and conditions effective for the contract when they were originated.

When terms and conditions are dissimilar, fair value is calculated by discounting future cash flows at the market rates prevailing at the end of the year, and when similar, fair value is similar to the carrying amount on the reporting date.

(b)

Held-for-sale assets

Represents the indirect interest held by PT Ventures in the dividends receivable and the fair value of the financial investment in Unitel, both classified as held for sale. The assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially at the fair value of the investment for sale, which occurred on January 23, 2020. See Notes 31 and 33 for further information.

(c)

Derivative financial instruments

The Company conducts derivative transactions to manage certain market risks, mainly the foreign exchange risk. At the closing date of for the year ended December 31, 2019, these instruments includeNon-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts. The Company does not use derivatives for any purposes other than hedging against these risks.

The method used to calculate the fair value of the derivative instruments contracted throughout the year was the future cash flows method associated to each contracted instrument, discounted using the market rates prevailing at the reporting date.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

3.2.

Financial risk management

The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ activities an exposedexpose them to several financial risks, such as: market risk (including currency variationfluctuation risk, interest rate risk on fair value, interest rate risk on cash flows, and price risk)flows), credit risk, and liquidity risk. The Company and its subsidiaries use derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain exposures to these risks.

Risk management is carried out by the Company’s treasury officer, in accordance with the policies approved by management.

The Hedging and Cash investments Policies, approved by the Board of Directors, document the management of exposures to market risk factors generated by the financial transactions of Oi Group companies.

Under Company policies, market risks are identified based on the features of financial transactions contracted and to be contracted during the year. Several scenarios are then simulated for each of the risk factors using statistical models, used as basis to measure the impacts on Group’s financial income (expenses). The Board of Directors meeting of January 2016 widened this concept, to also monitor impacts on Group’s financial cash flow, gross debt and net debt. Based on this analysis, the Executive Committee annually agrees with the Board of Directors a guideline to be followed in each financial year.

To ensure a proper risk management, the Company can contract and reverse hedging instruments, including derivative transactions such as swaps and currency forwards. The contract of such instruments depends on, among other factors, available funds within the credit limit set by banks. The Company and its subsidiaries do not use derivative financial instruments for other purposes.

According to their nature, financial instruments may involve known or unknown risks, and it is important to assess to the best judgment the potential of these risks. The Company and its subsidiaries may use derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain exposures to these risks.

The Company’s risk management process is a three-step process, taking into account its consolidated structure: strategic, tactical, and operational. At the strategic level, the Company’s executive committee agrees with the Board of Directors the risk guidelines to be followed. A Financial Risk Management Committee is responsible for overseeing and ensuring that Oi comply with the existing policies. At the operating level, risk management is carried out by the Company’s treasury officer, in accordance with the policies approved by the Board of Directors.

The Financial Risk Management Committee meets on a monthly basis and currently consists of the Chief Finance Officer, the Regulation, Wholesale and International Affairs Officer, the Legal Tax Officer, the Chief Controller, the Investor Relations Officer, and the Treasury Officer.

The Hedging and Cash Investments Policies, approved by the Board of Directors, document the management of exposures to market risk factors generated by the financial transactions of the Oi Group companies.

In the aftermath of the approval of the JRP, based on the measured new risk factors, the Company approved with the Board of Directors a new strategy to the Board of Directors to mitigate the risks arising on the foreign exchange exposure of its financial liabilities, as is ready to implement it as from this point in time. In line with the Hedging Policy pillars, the strategy is focused on the preservation of the Company’s cash flows, maintaining its liquidity, and complying with the financial covenants.

 

3.4.1.3.2.1.

Market risk

 

(a)

Foreign exchange risk

Financial assets

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

NotesThe Company is not exposed to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Foreignany material foreign exchange risk involving foreign currency-denominated cash equivalents and short-term investments are basically maintained in securities issued by financial institutions abroad similar to Bank Certificates of Deposit (CDBs) traded in Brazil (time deposits), and euro-denominated time deposits and United States dollars (“dollar” or “dollars”).

The risk associated to these assets arises from the possible exchange rate changes that may reduce the balance of these assets when translated into Brazilian reais. The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets subject to this risk represent approximately 73.22% (11.41%as at December 31, 2014) of our total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.

Net investment in foreign subsidiaries

The risks related2019, except with regard to the Company’s investments in foreign currency arise mainly fromassets held for sale, for which the investments in the subsidiaries in Africa. The Company does not haveenter into any contracted instrument to hedge against the risk associated to the net investments in foreign companies.currency hedging transaction.

Foreign exchange risk sensitivity analysis

Management estimated the impact of a potential depreciation of the euro and the US dollar by 25% and 50%, using as benchmark for the possible and remote scenarios, respectively, as follows:

   Rate 

Description

  2015   Depreciation 

Probable scenario

    

US dollar

   3.9048     0

Euro

   4.2504     0

Possible scenario

    

US dollar

   2.9286     25

Euro

   3.1878     25

Remote scenario

    

US dollar

   1.9524     50

Euro

   2.1252     50

2015

 

Description

  Individual risk  Probable
scenario
   Possible
scenario
   Remote
scenario
 

US dollar cash

  Dollar   642,418     481,814     321,209  

Euro cash

  Euro   12,438,363     9,328,772     6,219,182  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total associated to exchange rates

     13,080,781     9,810,586     6,540,391  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

The Company and its subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated or foreign currency-indexed borrowings and financing. The risk associated with these liabilities is related to the possibility of changesfluctuations in foreign exchange rates that could increase the balance of such liabilities. The CompanyCompany’s and subsidiariesits subsidiaries’ borrowings and financing exposed to this risk represent approximately 78.5% (41.7% at December 31, 2014)52.3% of total liabilities from borrowings and financing (2018 – 53.6%), less the contracted currency hedging transactions. In order toTo minimize this type of risk, we enterthe Company entered into currency hedges with financial institutions for part of the foreign exchangecurrency-denominated interest payments made in 2019. The Company hedged 67% of its total dollar-denominated debt service in 2019 through hedging transactions in the form of currency forwards and foreign currency-denominated cash investments. At the end of December 2019, approximately 32% of the US dollar-denominated debt for 2020 was hedged by cash in US dollars (natural hedge). Additionally, the Company hedged part of the Company’s US dollar-denominated operating expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

hedges withThe currency hedging percentage for purposes of covenant compliance and the financial institutions. Ofexpenses of the consolidated foreign currency-denominated debt, 99.5% (100.0% at December 31, 2014) is protected by exchange swaps, currency forwards,existing borrowings and short-term investmentsfinancing, including the impacts of changes in foreign currency. The cash denominated in euros and in US dollar operates as a natural hedge forexchange rates on the foreign denominated debt.fair value adjustment gain, is 50.1%.

These foreignForeign currency-denominated financial assets and financial liabilities are presented in the balance sheet as follows:

 

  2015   2014 
Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value   2019   2018 
  Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Financial assets

                

Cash and banks

   761,788     761,788     26,759     26,759     400,874    400,874    70,116    70,116 

Cash equivalents

   10,553,452     10,553,452     198,047     198,047     1,096    1,096    154,514    154,514 

Short-term investments

   1,765,541     1,765,541     86,807     86,807  

Held-for-sale assets

        

Held-for-sale financial asset

   1,474,699    1,474,699    1,843,778    1,843,778 

Dividends receivable

   2,435,014    2,435,014    2,566,935    2,566,935 

Financial liabilities

        

Borrowings and financing (Note 20)

   9,521,291    9,521,291    8,816,766    9,548,690 

Derivative financial instruments

   6,940,963     6,940,963     3,025,464     3,025,464     1,152    1,152     

Financial liabilities

        

Borrowings and financing (Note 16)

   46,935,152     30,727,817     14,781,242     14,342,043  

Derivative financial instruments

   1,915,910     1,915,910     425,784     425,784  

DerivativeThe amounts of the derivative financial instruments are summarized as follows:

 

   Derivatives designated for hedge accounting 
  Maturity (years)   Fair value 
    Amounts (payable)/receivable 
    2015   2014 

US$/R$ cross currency swaps

   0.1 - 8.2     4,954,291     1,816,206  

US$/fixed rate cross currency swaps

   4.8     819,647     649,293  

EUR/R$ cross currency swaps

   1.9 - 4.3     (169,513  

EUR/R$ non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

   < 1 year       23,524  
   Derivatives designated for hedge accounting 
  Notional (US$)   Maturity (years)   Fair value 
  Amounts
(payable)/receivable
 
  2019 

USD/R$Non-deliverable forwards (NDF)

   17,000.00    < 1 year    (1,152

   Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting 
  Maturity (years)   Fair value 
    Amounts (payable)/receivable 
    2015   2014 

US$/R$ cross currency swaps

   < 1 year     31,467     24,122  

R$/US$ cross currency swaps

   < 1 year     (27,965   (31,290

US$/R$ non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

   < 1 year     (156,707   107,718  

EUR/R$ non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

   < 1 year     (427,452   10,107  

Options (USD/R$ put option)

   3.3 - 4.8     8,783    

Options (EUR/R$ put option)

   3.8     24,767    

Options (EUR/R$ call option)

   3.8     (32,265  

TheAt yearend, the main foreign currency hedgehedging transactions contractedconducted with financial institutions to minimizewith the objective minimizing the foreign exchange risk co cambial are as follows:

Cross currency swapNon-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts (plain vanilla)

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

US$/R$: Refer to foreign exchange swaps to protect its US dollar-denominated debt payments. Under these contracts, the asset position is in US dollars plus a fixed interest rate or in US LIBOR plus a fixed interest rate, and the liability position a percentage of interbank deposit rate (CDI) or a fixed rate in Brazilian Real. The main risk of loss in the asset position of these instruments is the US dollar exchange rate change; however, such losses would be fully offset by the US dollar-denominated debt’s maturities.

R$/US$: Refer to foreign exchange swaps to reverse swap contracts. Under these contracts, the asset position is in US dollar plus a fixed rate and the liability position is a percentage of CDI. The main risk of loss in the liability position of these instruments is the US dollar exchange rate change; however, such possible losses would be fully offset by the maturities of the reversed US dollar-denominated swaps.

Non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

US$/R$: Refer to future US dollar purchase transactions using NDFs to hedge against athe depreciation of the Brazilian real in relation toagainst the US dollar. The mainkey strategy for these contracts is to set theeliminate foreign exchange rate for the contract period at a fixed amount, thus mitigating the risk of adverse fluctuations on US dollar-denominated debt. In order to extend the hedging period, we can roll over these instruments by selling US dollars for the period equivalent to the short-term NDF in the portfolio and simultaneously purchase US dollars for longer positions.

Euro/R$: Refer to future Euro dollar purchase transactions using NDFs to hedge against a depreciation of the Brazilian real in relation to the US dollar. The main strategy for these contracts is to set the foreign exchange rate for the contract period at a fixed amount, thus mitigating the risk of adverse fluctuations on euro-denominated debt. In order to extend the hedging period, we can roll over these instruments by selling euro for the period equivalent to the short-term NDF in the portfolio and simultaneously purchase euro for longer positions.

Options (put options)

Refers to the purchase of dollar put options related to debt’s principal to hedge against an appreciation of the real against the dollar. The main strategy of these options is to set a threshold foreign exchange rate for a set of swapsdifferences during the contract period, thus mitigating unfavorable changes in the long position of these derivatives.foreign exchange rates on dollar-denominated debts or operating expenses.

As at December 31, 2015 and 2014,2019, the Company recognized as result of derivative transactions in the amounts shown below were recognized in financial income (expenses) (see Note 6):below:

 

   2015   2014 

Gain (loss) on currency swaps

   4,539,844     674,228  

Currency forwards

   1,322,916     (317,740

Options

   (21,850  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,840,910     356,488  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

2019

Forward currency transaction – financial results

55,025

Forward currency transaction – operating results

17,088

Total

72,113

The movements below, related to currencyin foreign exchange hedges designated for hedge accounting treatment, were recognized in other comprehensive income:income.

 

Table of movements in hedge accounting effects in other comprehensive income

 

Balance in 2012at 12/31/2018

  128,127

Loss onResults of designated hedges

   (126,511

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

(16,611

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at effective rate

36,072

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

36,397

Balance in 2013

57,474

Gain on designated hedges

143,524

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

10,44311,901 

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at the effective rate

9,081

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

   (55,43713,053

Balance in 2014

165,085

Gain on designated hedgesat 12/31/2019

   (697,7261,152)

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

(7,626

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at the effective rate

8,336

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

236,985

Balance in 2015

(294,946) 

(a.1)

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Foreign exchange risk sensitivity analysis

As at December 31, 2015,2019, management estimated the depreciation scenarios of the Brazilian real in relation to other currencies, at yearend. the end of the reporting period.

The rates used for the probable scenario were the rates prevailing at the end of December 2015.2019. The probable rates were then depreciated by 25% and 50% and used as benchmark for the possible and remote scenarios, respectively.

 

   Rate 

Description

  2015   Depreciation 

Probable scenario

    

US dollar

   3.90480     0

Euro

   4.25040     0

Possible scenario

    

US dollar

   4.88100     25

Euro

   5.31300     25

Remote scenario

    

US dollar

   5.85720     50

Euro

   6.37560     50

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

As at December 31, 2015, management estimated the outflow for the payment of interest and principal of its debt associated to exchange rates based on the interest rates prevailing at the end of this annual reporting period and the exchange rates above.

   Rate 

Description

  2019   Depreciation 

Probable scenario

    

U.S. dollar

   4.0307    0% 

Euro

   4.5305    0% 

Possible scenario

    

U.S. dollar

   5.0384    25% 

Euro

   5.6631    25% 

Remote scenario

    

U.S. dollar

   6.0461    50% 

Euro

   6.7958    50% 

The impacts of foreign exchange exposure on the foreign currency-denominated debt, considering offshore derivatives and cash, in the sensitivity scenarios estimated by the Company, are shown in the table below:

 

2015

 

Description

  Individual
risk
  Probable
scenario
   Possible
scenario
   Remote
scenario
 

US dollar debt

  Dollar appreciation   23,054,987     28,818,734     34,582,481  

Derivatives (net position - US$)

  Dollar depreciation   (22,470,237   (28,087,796   (33,705,356

US dollar cash

  Dollar depreciation   (642,418   (803,023   (963,627

Euro debt

  Euro appreciation   24,316,758     30,395,948     36,475,137  

Derivatives (net position - euro)

  Euro depreciation   (11,606,953   (14,508,691   (17,410,430

Euro cash

  Euro depreciation   (12,438,363   (15,547,954   (18,657,545
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total associated to exchange rates

     213,774     267,218     320,660  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    2019 

Description

  Individual risk   Probable
scenario
  Possible
scenario
  Remote
scenario
 

US dollar debts

   Dollar appreciation    15,594,278   19,492,848   23,391,418 

US dollar cash

   Dollar depreciation    (283,409  (354,261  (425,113

Euro debt

   Euro appreciation    2,711,459   3,389,323   4,067,188 

Euro cash

   Euro depreciation    (112,796  (140,995  (169,194

Fair value adjustment

   Dollar/euro depreciation    (8,772,305  (10,965,381  (13,158,458

Total assets/liabilities indexed to exchange fluctuation

     9,137,227   11,421,534   13,705,841 

Total (gain) loss

      2,284,307   4,568,614 

 

(b)

Interest rate risk

Financial assets

Cash equivalents and short-termcash investments in local currency are substantially maintained in financial investment funds exclusively managed for the Company and its subsidiaries, and investments in private securities issued by prime financial institutions.

The interest rate risk linked to these assets arises from the possibility of decreases in these rates and consequent decrease in the return on these assets.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Financial liabilities

The Company and its subsidiaries have borrowings and financing subject to floating interest rates, based on the Long-term Interest Rate (TJLP), the CDI, or the CDI,Benchmark Rate in the case of real-denominated debt as at December 31, 2019. After the approval of the JRP, the Company does not have borrowings and on the LIBOR, in the case of U.S. dollar-denominated debt.financing subject to foreign currency-denominated floating interest rate.

As at December 31, 2015,2019, approximately 33.4% (60.3%47.5% (46.0% at December 31, 2014)2018) of the incurred debt, less adjustment for derivative transactions, was subject to floating interest rates. After the derivative transactions, approximately 59.6% (79.4% at December 31, 2014) of the consolidated debt was subject to floating interest rates. The most material exposure of Company’s and its subsidiaries’ debt after the hedging transactions is to CDI. Therefore, a continued increase in this interest rate would have an adverse impact on future interest payments and hedging adjustments.

We continuously monitor these market rates to assess the possible contracting of derivatives to reduce the risk of fluctuation of these rates.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

payments.

These assets and liabilities are presented in the balance sheet as follows:

 

   2015   2014 
  Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Financial assets

        

Cash equivalents

   3,232,771     3,232,771     1,718,874     1,718,874  

Short-term investments

   162,145     162,145     195,893     195,893  

Derivative financial instruments

   445,740     445,740     196,017     196,017  

Financial liabilities

        

Borrowings and financing

   18,307,705     18,298,218     17,722,928     17,717,628  

Derivative financial instruments

   594,433     594,433     241,138     241,138  
   2019   2018 
   Carrying
amount
   Market
value
   Carrying
amount
   Market
value
 

Financial assets

        

Cash equivalents

   1,504,986    1,504,986    3,943,324    3,943,324 

Cash investments

   217,792    217,792    238,962    238,962 

Financial liabilities

        

Borrowings and financing (Note 20)

   8,705,458    8,705,458    7,633,140    7,633,140 

The amounts of contracted derivatives to manage exposure to floating interest rates on outstanding debt are summarized below:

   Derivatives designated for hedge accounting 
  Maturity (years)   Fair value 
    Amounts (payable)/receivable 
    2015   2014 

Fixed rate/DI rate swaps

   4.8     (146,121   (37,627

US$ LIBOR/US$ fixed rate swaps

   < 1 year       (1,413

   Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting 
  Maturity (years)   Fair value 
    Amounts (payable)/receivable 
    2015   2014 

US$ LIBOR/US$ fixed rate swaps

   0.1- 6.1     (448,312   (200,771

US$ fixed rate/US$ LIBOR swaps

   6.1     445,740     194,690  

The main derivative transactions contracted with financial institutions to minimize the interest rate risk are as follows:

Interest rate swaps

US$ LIBOR/US$ fixed rate: Refer to interest rate swaps to protect debt payments associated to US dollar floating rates from exchange fluctuation. Under these contracts, the asset position in US dollar LIBOR and the liability position is a fixed rate. The risk of loss in the asset position of these instruments is, therefore, the fluctuation of the US dollar LIBOR; however, such possible losses would be fully offset by maturities of USdollar-denominated debt associated to LIBOR.

US$ fixed rate/US$ LIBOR: Refers to the interest rate swap transaction that changes US dollar-denominated debt payments from fixed rate to floating rate. Under this contract, the asset position is a US dollar fixed rate and the liability position is subject to LIBOR aimed at reducing the cost of the underlying debt, as part of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities management strategy.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

R$ fixed rate/CDI: Refer to interest rate swaps to convert a foreign exchange swap liability position at a fixed rate into R$ to a liability subject to a DI percentage. This transaction is intended to swap the foreign exchange fluctuation of a certain dollar-denominated debt to a floating DI position, cancelling the debt’s current fixed rate position.

As at December 31, 2015 and 2014, the amounts shown below were recorded as gain or loss on derivatives: (see Note 6).

   2015   2014 

Gain (loss) on interest rate swap

   (43,808   70,896  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (43,808   70,896  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The movements below, related interest rate hedges designated for hedge accounting treatment, were recognized in other comprehensive income:

Table of movements in hedge accounting effects in other comprehensive income

Balance in 2012

12,057

Loss on designated hedges

(80,487

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

500

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at effective rate

(24,075

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

35,381

Balance in 2013

(56,624

Gain on designated hedges

20,029

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

(97

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at the effective rate

3,070

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

(7,820

Share of subsidiary’s hedge accounting

Balance in 2014

(41,442

Gain on designated hedges

(104,339

Transfer on ineffective portion to profit or loss

78

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss at the effective rate

3,325

Deferred taxes on hedge accounting

34,319

Balance in 2015

(108,059

(b.1) Interest rate fluctuation risk sensitivity analysis

Oi S.A.The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash and Subsidiaries

Notescash equivalents and its indebtedness. The interest rate risk on the indebtedness is from the portion of the indebtedness having a variable interest rate. Changes in the interest rates could impact the amount of interest that the Company is required to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

pay or receive.

Management believes that the most significantmaterial risk related to interest rate fluctuations arises from its liabilities associatedpegged to the TJLP, the USD LIBOR,CDI and mainly the CDI.TJLP. This risk is associated to an increase in those rates.

As The TJLP rate remained stable at 7.0% p.a. from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2015, management2017. Beginning January 1, 2018, the TJLP was being successively reduced: 6.75% per year up to March 2018, 6.6% per year from April to June 2018, and 6.56% from July to September 2018. In turn, from October to December 2018 this rate was increased to 6.98% per year, it was increased to 7.03%, from January to March 2019, to 7.03%, and reduced again from April to June to 6.26%, from July to September to 5.95%, and from October to December to 5.57%. At the end of the quarter the National Monetary Council decided to reduce this rate again to 5.09% per year, effective for January-March 2020.

Management estimated the fluctuation scenarios of the rates CDI and TJLP and USD LIBOR.as at December 31, 2019. The rates used for the probable scenario were the rates prevailing at the end of the reporting period. year.

These rates have been stressed by 2525% and 50 percent,50%, and used as benchmark for the possible and remote scenarios. Important to consider that in the beginning of January 2015, the TJLP increased from 5.0% p.a. to 5.5% p.a., which was the start of successive increases. For the quarter beginning April 2015, the TJLP increased to 6.0%, remaining at 6.5% in July and in October 1-December 31, 2015 it increased to 7.0%.

Before the end of the first quarter of 2016, the National Monetary Council had decided for a new increase for this rate, this time to 7.5% p.a., effective in January 1 - March 31, 2016.

 

2015 
Interest rate scenarios 
Probable scenario  Possible scenario  Remote scenario 
CDI  TJLP  6M USD
LIBOR
  CDI  TJLP  6M USD
LIBOR
  CDI  TJLP  6M USD
LIBOR
 
 14.14  7.0  0.84615  17.68  8.8  1.05769  21.21  10.5  1.26923

As at December 31, 2015, management estimated the future outflows for the payment of interest and principal of its debt associated to CDI, TJLP, and USD LIBOR based on the interest rates above.

2019

Interest rate scenarios

Probable scenario

  

Possible scenario

  

Remote scenario

CDI

  

TJLP

  

CDI

  

TJLP

  

CDI

  

TJLP

4.59%

  5.57%  5.74%  6.96%  6.89%  8.36%

Such sensitivity analysis considers payment outflows in future dates. Thus, the aggregate of the amounts for each scenario is not equivalent to the fair values, or even the presentfair values of these liabilities. The fair values

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of these liabilities, should the Company’s credit risk remain unchanged, would not be impacted in the event of fluctuations in interest rates, as the interest rates used to estimate future cash outflows would be the same rates that discount such flows to present value.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The impacts of exposure to interest rates, in the sensitivity scenarios estimated by the Company, are shown in the table below:

 

2015

 

Transaction

  Individual
risk
  Probable
scenario
   Possible
scenario
   Remote
scenario
 

CDI-indexed debt

  CDI increase   2,120,449     2,516,488     2,980,156  

Derivative financial instruments (net position - CDI)

  CDI increase   10,669,673     13,047,050     15,566,283  

TJLP-indexed debt

  TJLP increase   942,049     1,119,643     1,304,957  

US$ LIBOR-indexed debt

  US$ LIBOR increase   562,123     660,468     715,699  

Derivative instruments (net position - LIBOR)

  US$ LIBOR decrease   (198,734   (211,566   (231,488
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total associated to interest rates

     14,095,560     17,132,083     20,335,607  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

    2019 

Description

  Individual risk   Probable scenario   Possible scenario   Remote scenario 

Debt pegged to CDI

   CDI increase    4,601,044    5,330,277    6,583,653 

Debt pegged to TJLP

   TJLP increase    3,221,576    4,232,356    4,972,246 

Total assets/liabilities pegged to the interest rate

     7,822,620    9,562,633    11,555,899 

Total (gain) loss

       1,740,013    3,733,279 

 

3.4.2.3.2.2.

Credit risk

The concentration of credit risk associated to trade receivables is immaterial due to the diversification of the portfolio. Doubtful receivables are adequately covered by an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Transactions with financial institutions (short-term(cash investments and borrowings and financing) are made with prime entities, avoiding the concentration risk. The credit risk of financial investments is assessed by setting caps for investment in the counterparts, taking into consideration the ratings released by the main international risk rating agencies for each one of such counterparts. As at December 31, 2015,2019, approximately 99.20%80.92% of the consolidated short-termcash investments were made with counterparties with an AAA, AA, orA, and sovereign risk rating.

The Company had credit risks related to dividends receivable associated to the investment in Unitel (Note 26).

 

3.4.3.3.2.3.

Liquidity risk

The liquidity risk also arises from the possibility of the Company being unable to settledischarge its liabilities on maturity dates and obtain cash due to market liquidity restrictions. Management uses its resources mainly to fund capital expenditures incurred on the expansion and upgrading of the network, invest in new businesses.

During 2015, our operations generated negativeThe Company’s management monitors the continual forecasts of the liquidity requirements to ensure that the company has sufficient cash flowsto meet its operating needs and fund capital expenditure to modernize and expand its network.

At the beginning of 2019, Oi completed the capital increase provided for in the JRP. With this increase, the Company received R$1,054 million. As a result, we financed investing activities,4.0 billion, which were allocated to the incremental CAPEX Plan, directed to the expansion of the mobile and fixed infrastructure, while focused primarily on the fiber optics project. In addition to the capital increase, to finance the incremental CAPEX associated to the Strategic Plan, the Company plans to divest unessential and release cash throughnon-operating event such as, for example, tax credits. Added to this debt service and working capital from our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments. Historically, we have financed our investments in property, plant and equipment throughis the useissue of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing.

As of December 31, 2015, our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments amountedup to R$16,700 million and our consolidated indebtedness amounted to R$ 59,857million. We anticipated that we will be required to spend approximately R$19,725 million to meet our short-term contractual obligations and commitments during 2016, and an additional approximately R$30,672 million to meet our long-term contractual obligations and commitments2.5 billion in 2017 and 2018.

On March 9, 2016, we announced that we had retained PJT Partners as our financial advisor to assist ussimple, nonconvertible debentures by Oi Móvel, a prepetition financing line, in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize our liquidity and debt profile. On April 25, 2016, we entered into a customary non-disclosure agreementthe form of DIP Financing, in line with Moelis & Company, who acts as advisor for a diverse ad hoc groupthe provisions of holdersClause 5.3 of the bonds issued by Oi and its subsidiaries, as an initial step towards discussions of a potential restructuring of its indebtedness.Company’s PRJ.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The following are the contractual maturities of the financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments, where applicable:

   Less than
One Year
   One to Three
Years
   Three to
Five Years
   More than
Five Years
   Total 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Continuing operations:

  

Loans and financings (i)

  R$15,282    R$24,998    R$16,894    R$6,243    R$63,417  

Debentures (ii)

   1,622     4,170     17          5,809  

Unconditional purchase obligations (iii)

   1,477     758     343          2,578  

Concession fees (iv)

   288     306     348     1,437     2,379  

Usage rights (v)

   912     7               919  

Pension plan contributions (vi)

   144     433     289     577     1,443  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  R$19,725    R$30,672    R$17,891    R$8,257    R$76,545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amounts disclosed in the tables take into account the contractual undiscounted payment outflow estimates, these amounts are not reconciled with the amounts disclosed in the balance sheet for borrowings and financing, derivative financial instruments, and trade payables.

(i)Includes (1) estimated future payments of interest on our loans and financings, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates applicable at December 31, 2015 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loans and financings will be made on their scheduled payment dates, and (2) estimated future cash flows on our derivative obligations, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates applicable as of December 31, 2015 and assuming that all payments on our derivative obligations will be made on their scheduled payment dates;

(ii)Includes estimated future payments of interest on our debentures, calculated based on interest rates applicable as of December 31, 2015 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our debentures will be made on their scheduled payment dates;

(iii)Consists of (1) obligations in connection with a business process outsourcing agreement, and (2) purchase obligations for network equipment pursuant to binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction;

(iv)Consists of estimated bi-annual fees due to ANATEL under our concession agreements expiring in 2025. These estimated amounts are calculated based on our results for the year ended December 31, 2015;

(v)Consists of payments due to ANATEL for radio frequency licenses. Includes accrued and unpaid interest as of December 31, 2015; and

(vi)Consists of expected contributions to amortize the actuarial deficit of the BrTPREV plan.

Capital management

The Company seeks to manage its equity structure according to best market practices.

The objective of the Company’s capital management strategy is to ensure that liquidity levels and financial leverage to allow the sustained growth of the Group, the compliance with the strategic investment plan, and generation of returns to our shareholders.

The CompanyWe may change itsour capital structure, according to existing economic and financial conditions, to optimize itsour financial leverage and debt management (Note 1).management.

The indicators commonly used to measure capital structure management are: gross debt to accumulated twelve-month EBITDA (earnings before interest (financial income and expenses), taxes, depreciation, and amortization,amortization), and other nonrecurring results), net debt (gross debt less cashthe interest coverage ratio, as shown below:

Gossdebt-to-EBITDA

between 2x and 4.0x

Interest coverage ratio (*)

higher than 1.75

(*)

Measure the Company’s capacity to cover its future interest obligations.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

and cash equivalents and short-term investments) to accumulated twelve-month EBITDA, and the interest coverage ratio.

 

3.4.4.3.2.4.

Risk of acceleration ofaccelerated maturity of borrowings and financing

UnderAny default event in some debt instruments of the Company default events can trigger theand its subsidiaries might result in accelerated maturity of other debt instruments.The impossibility to incur in new debt might preventborrowings and financing.Currently, the company from investing inCompany does not anticipate any risk of default on any of its business and incur in required or advisable capital expenditures, which would reduce future sales and adversely impact its profitability.Additionally, the funds necessary to meet the payment commitments of the borrowings raised can reduce the amount of funds available for capital expenditures.regular cash obligations.

The risk of accelerated maturity arising from noncompliance of financial covenants associated to the debt is detailedwas mitigated through a waiver that prevents acceleration due to failure to comply with certain covenants in first quarter of 2020. For further detail, see Note 16,20, in the section ‘Covenants’.

 

4.

NET OPERATING REVENUE

 

  2015   2014   2013 
  2019 2018 2017 

Gross operating revenue

   44,519,320     45,357,481     45,252,584     27,218,787   30,426,548   36,338,432 

Deductions from gross revenue

   (17,165,555   (17,110,382   (16,830,437   (7,082,604  (8,366,534  (12,548,778

Taxes

   (8,148,655   (8,906,909   (9,538,623   (5,641,876 (6,725,356 (7,707,961

Discounts and other deductions

   (9,016,900   (8,203,473   (7,291,814

Other deductions

   (1,440,728 (1,641,178 (4,840,817

Net operating revenue

   27,353,765     28,247,099     28,422,147     20,136,183   22,060,014   23,789,654 

 

5.OPERATING

REVENUE AND EXPENSES BY NATURE

 

  2015   2014   2013   December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
 

Operating expenses by nature

          

Third-party services

   (6,317,233   (6,258,606   (6,119,733   (6,030,542 (5,924,556 (6,221,058

Depreciation and amortization

   (6,195,039   (5,766,702   (5,691,824   (6,873,945 (5,811,123 (5,109,292

Rentals and Insurance(i)

   (3,599,830   (3,119,521   (2,119,684   (2,575,862 (4,200,212 (4,162,659

Personnel

   (2,719,530   (2,829,307   (2,534,222   (2,528,823 (2,594,464 (2,791,331

Network maintenance service

   (1,901,569   (1,923,074   (2,328,140   (1,014,432 (1,104,015 (1,251,511

Interconnection

   (1,808,845   (2,689,815   (3,965,623   (487,413 (658,068 (778,083

Contingencies

   (861,500   (779,314   (656,849

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (721,175   (649,463   (922,779

Advertising and publicity

   (405,626   (674,275   (556,500

Provision for contingencies

   (216,438 (202,268 (469,440

Expected credit losses

   (489,396 (697,324 (691,807

Advertising and marketing

   (497,278 (382,091 (413,580

Handset and other costs

   (284,637   (730,444   (515,377   (170,860 (196,347 (223,335

Impairment losses (i)

   (590,641    

Taxes and other income (expenses)

   (1,013,056   (1,459,012   (1,397,982

Impairment gain (loss) (ii)

   (2,111,022 (291,758 4,747,141 

Taxes and other expenses

   (110,568 (249,688 (542,832

Other operating income (expenses), net (iii)

   (6,974 (5,016,358 (8,242,895

Total operating expenses

   (23,113,553  (27,328,272  (26,150,682

Operating expenses by function

    

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,314,814 (16,179,100 (15,668,653

Selling expenses

   (3,547,684 (3,853,002 (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782,300 (2,738,718 (3,136,808

Other operating income

   4,527,710  2,204,134  1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   (5,996,465 (6,761,586 (5,227,766

Total operating expenses by function

   (23,113,553 (27,328,272 (26,150,682

(i)

The semiannual comparison was impacted by the adoption of IFRS 16—Leases beginning January 1, 2019 (Note 2(d)).

(ii)

As required by IAS 36, the Company conducts annually an impairment test of its assets with finite useful lives and recognizes an impairment loss related to the expected future profitability of such assets. The Company took into consideration in its assumptions for the 2019 impairment test, among other aspects, the Strategic Plan disclosed in July 2019. The plan rests on transformation actions, focused on improving operational and financial performance (see Note 17).

(iii)

In 2019, refers primarily to: (a) the recognition of other income from PIS and COFINS credits arising on the deduction of ICMS from PIS and COFINS tax base, as well as the recovery of unduly paid amounts on that tax base, as ruled in the final and unappealable court decision issued in March and September 2019, amounting to R$1,517,919 (Note 11) and (b) the recognition of expenses on the provision related to an onerous contract for the supply of satellite capacity, amounting to R$1,230,820 (Note 25), and (c) recognition of expenses related to the derecognition arising from the reconciliation of prior periods’ tax credits and incentives, which are not expected to be realized, amounting to R$167,395. In 2018 refers basically to: (a) expenses on the provision related to the recognition of the onerous contract for the provision of submarine cable capacity, amounting to R$4,883,620; and (b) recognition of income from the reversal of the provision for the contingency, amounting to R$109,242, arising from the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the JRP. In 2017, R$6,482,485 refer main to the additional provision arising from the review of the calculations of the provision for contingencies related administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL, talking into accounting the publication of the decision that grants the judicial reorganization in February 5, 2018.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Other operating income (expenses), net (ii)

   277,954     3,245,643     2,369,555  
   (26,140,727   (23,633,890   (24,439,158

Operating expenses by function

      

Cost of sales and/or services

   (16,250,083   (16,257,192   (16,466,773

Selling expenses

   (4,719,811   (5,565,757   (5,532,045

General and administrative expenses

   (3,912,178   (3,834,563   (3,683,440

Other operating income

   1,630,056     4,466,914     3,193,024  

Other operating expenses

   (2,866,828   (2,437,411   (1,932,174

Equity pick up

   (21,883   (5,881   (17,750
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   (26,140,727   (23,633,890   (24,439,158
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
6.

FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES)

   2019  2018  2017 

Financial income

    

Fair value adjustment (i)

   48,756   13,290,262   4,873,000 

Monetary correction and foreign exchange differences on the fair value adjustment

   334,269   1,398,594  

Gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings (ii)

    11,054,800  

Interest on and monetary correction to other assets (iii)

   1,922,176   808,764   1,049,923 

Income from cash investments

   238,828   316,880   702,171 

Exchange differences on translating foreign cash investments

   (52,013  1,329   11,105 

Reversal of interest and other income (iv)

   170,447   4,079,832   500,260 

Total

   2,662,463   30,950,461   7,136,459 

Financial expenses and other charges

    

a)  Borrowing and financing costs

    

Recognition of fair value adjustment

   (910,491  (760,197 

Monetary correction to and exchange losses on third-party borrowings (v)

   (640,068  (2,493,618  (2,920,455

Interest on borrowings from third parties (vi)

   (1,295,545  1,299,094   (3,122,166

Interest on debentures (vi)

   (322,218  493,833   (472,173

Subtotal:

   (3,168,322  (1,460,888  (6,514,794

b)  Other charges

    

Interest on leases

   (948,973  

Gain (loss) on cash investments classified as held for sale

   (237,593  292,700   (267,008

Tax on transactions and bank fees

   (456,579  (870,488  (512,003

Interest on, monetary correction to, and foreign exchange differences on other liabilities (vii)

   (1,854,304  (1,251,215  (1,553,746

Monetary correction to (provisions)/reversals (viii)

   (1,620,378  (226,870  (674,668

Interest on taxes in installments—tax financing program

   (16,159  (28,079  (27,294

Derivative transactions

   55,025   

Other expenses (ix)

   (524,898  (796,755  (783,458

Subtotal:

   (5,603,859  (2,880,707  (3,818,177

Total

   (8,772,181  (4,341,595  (10,332,971

Financial income (expenses)

   (6,109,718  26,608,866   (3,196,512

 

(i)As at December 31, 2015,

In 2018, refers to the Company conductedrecognition of the annual impairment test and recognized a loss on goodwill amounting to R$501,465 related to goodwill and trademarks for the Telecommunication services in Brazil due to a significant change in the macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and R$89,176 related to Africa which is being reported as held for sale. The fair value of third-party borrowings and financing arising from the reporting unit was estimated usingimpacts of the expectedratification of the JRP. In 2017, refers to the adjustment to present value of future cash flows.

(ii)The other net operating income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily include the reversal of a civil contingency amounting to R$325,709 arising from the revision of the calculation methodologycalculations of the provision for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and R$47,756lawsuits involving ANATEL, taking into account the best estimate of future cash outflows based on the payment methods prescribed in costs relatingthe JRP.

(ii)

In 2018, refers basically to terminationsthe positive impact of employmentsthe novation of the debt represented by the qualified Senior Notes, calculated pursuant to the JRP.

(iii)

In 2019, refers to the accounting recognition amounting R$2,100 million related to the monetary correction to PIS and COFINS credits arising from the deduction of ICMS from the tax base of PIS and COFINS, as well as the recovery of unduly paid amounts as PIS and COFINS, under a final and unappealable court decision reached in March and September 2019, as described in Note 11.

(iv)

In 2018, represented mainly by the reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in the JRP, adjusted in the period prior to the ratification of the Plan amounting to R$3,013 million and adjustment of trade payables and default payment to fair value amounting to R$877 million.

(v)

In 2018, includes R$555 million related to the modification gain associated to the novation of debts arising on the Senior Notes.

(vi)

In 2018, represented mainly by the reversal of interest on the debt included in the JRP amounting to R$3,115 million and interest expenses on novated debt and debentures totaling R$167 million.

(vii)

This line item includes interest related to the present value adjustment associated with the liabilities of onerous contracts in this period. Other net operating income (expenses) forand trade payables subject to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarilyJudicial Reorganization.

(viii)

In 2019, includes the gain of R$2.4 billionimpact arising on the sale, net of transaction expenses, recognized in the contextreview of the agreement entered into on December 3, 2013 by the Company and SBA Torres Brasil for the transfer of 100% of the shares of one of its subsidiaries that held 2,007 telecommunication towers used to provide mobile telephony services and R$355 million resulting from the revision of theprovision estimate calculation methodology of the provisionslabor and civil contingencies, supported by the loss risk assessment made by the Company’s legal advisors. The Company recognized new provision for losses in corporate lawsuitslabor and the reversal of R$476 million from the provisioncivil contingencies, during 2019, related to the adhesionreview of the provision estimate calculation methodology, and part of the amount was recognized in financial expenses due to monetary corrections in compliance with the REFIS tax refinancing program.Law applicable for Labor and Civil proceedings.

(ix)

Represented mainly by financial banking fees and commissions.

 

6.FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES)

   2015   2014   2013 

Financial income

      

Exchange differences on translating foreign short-term investments (trading)

   3,349,783     32,444     69,626  

Interest on other assets

   740,417     762,498     694,734  

Income from short-term investments

   235,042     354,526     278,598  

Interest on related parties loans

   29,057     1,066    

Other income (i)

   1,010,235     194,233     332,259  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,364,534     1,344,767     1,375,217  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial expenses and other charges

      

a) Borrowing and financing costs

      

Inflation and exchange losses on third-party borrowings

   (10,908,438   (1,464,510   (2,013,066

Interest on borrowings payable to third parties

   (3,178,461   (1,979,414   (1,591,915

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

7.

INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION

Income taxes encompass the income tax and the social contribution. The income tax rate is 25% and the social contribution rate is 9%, generating aggregate nominal tax rate of 34%.

The provision for income tax and social contribution is broken down as follows:

 

Interest on debentures

   (871,977   (953,863   (860,400

Derivatives

   5,797,102     427,384     1,158,520  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal:

   (9,161,774   (3,970,403   (3,306,861
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

b) Other charges

      

Loss on available for sale financial assets (ii)

   (447,737    

Interest on other liabilities

   (833,276   (814,148   (643,318

Tax on transactions and bank fees

   (712,799   (385,824   (193,048

Inflation adjustment to provisions

   (176,297   (233,276   (246,205

Interest on taxes in installments - tax financing program

   (93,784   (132,194   (81,262

Other expenses (iii)

   (476,875   (357,844   (206,479
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal:

   (2,740,768   (1,923,286   (1,370,312
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (11,902,542   (5,893,689   (4,677,173
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses)

   (6,538,008   (4,548,922   (3,301,956
   2019  2018   2017 

Income tax and social contribution

     

Current taxes

   (77,060  115,706    (906,080

Deferred taxes (Note 10)

   69,041   3,159,241    (192,542

Total

   (8,019  3,274,947    (1,098,622

   2019  2018  2017 

Pre-tax profit (loss)

   (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Income tax and social contribution

    

Income tax and social contribution on taxed income

   3,089,610   (7,255,807  1,889,564 

Equity in investees

   (1,759  (4,587  (147

Tax incentives (basically, operating profit) (i)

   1,263   3,068   14,008 

Permanent deductions(add-backs) (ii)

   (312,512  13,285,260   148,424 

Reversal of (Allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets (iii)

   (2,474,232  (2,757,044  (2,717,564

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries (iv)

   (310,389  4,057   (432,907

Income tax and social contribution effect on profit or loss

   (8,019  3,274,947   (1,098,622

 

(i)

Refers basically to the gain on debenture repayment transactions and includes USD187.5 million (R$733 million) related with our portionexploration profit recognized in the profit or loss of dividends approved by Unitel.subsidiary Oi Móvel pursuant to Law 11638/2007.

(ii)Refers basically

In 2019, the tax effects from permanentadd-backs are represented mainly by the recognition of the fair value adjustment to the loss of R$408 million due to other-than-temporary impairmentrestructured liabilities included in the JRP. In 2018 the main tax effects from permanent deductions arising from the recognition of the investmentrestructuring of the liabilities included in Unitel classified as available-for-sale.the JRP.

(iii)Represented mainly

Refers to the reversal (recognition) of the allowance for the realizable value (impairment) of deferred tax assets (Note 10).

(iv)

Refers to the effects of unrecognized deferred tax assets held by financial fees and commissions.foreign subsidiaries that do not have a history of profitability and/or an expectation to generate taxable income.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

7.8.

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

Short-termCash investments made by the Company and its subsidiaries in the years ended December 31, 20152019 and 2014, are classified as trading securities and2018 are measured at their fair values.

 

(a)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Cash and banks

   1,111,840     532,285     575,863    287,491 

Cash equivalents

   13,786,223     1,916,921     1,506,082    4,097,838 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   14,898,063     2,449,206     2,081,945    4,385,329 
  

 

   

 

 

 

   2015   2014 

Time deposits

   10,734,985     205,523  

Bank certificates of deposit (CDBs)

   1,387,158     920,116  

Repurchase agreements

   1,637,798     773,487  

Other

   26,282     17,795  

Cash equivalents

   13,786,223     1,916,921  

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2019   2018 

Repurchase agreements(i)

   1,192,708    2,742,731 

Certificated of Bank Deposit (CDB)

   173,854    301,632 

Private securities(ii)

   134,818    895,073 

Time deposits

   1,096    154,514 

Other

   3,606    3,888 

Cash equivalents

   1,506,082    4,097,838 

 

(b)

Short-term and long-term investments

 

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Time deposits

   1,700,386    

Private securities

   125,966     111,285  

Private securities(iii)

   196,203    213,653 

Government securities

   101,334     171,415     21,589    25,309 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,927,686     282,700     217,792    238,962 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   1,801,720     171,415     183,850    201,975 

Non-current

   125,966     111,285     33,942    36,987 

(i)

Represented mainly by exclusive investment funds composed by Government Securities with yield pegged to the SELIC rate. The portfolio is preferably allocated to highly liquid spot market instruments for all investments.

(ii)

Represented mainly by financial treasury bills from private banks with remuneration linked to CDI rate and immediate liquidity.

(iii)

Represented mainly by the investments with yield pegged to the SELIC and CDB rates.

The Company and its subsidiaries hold short-termcash investments in Brazil and abroad for the purpose of earning interest on cash, benchmarked to CDI in Brazil, LIBOR for the US dollar-denominated portion, and EURIBOR for the euro-denominated portion.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

8.9.TRADE

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE NET

 

  2015   2014   2019 2018 

Billed services

   6,733,219     5,481,028     5,910,643  5,699,817 

Unbilled services

   1,296,562     1,450,777     842,726  984,062 

Mobile handsets and accessories sold

   911,077     1,032,022  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (561,139   (513,787
  

 

   

 

 

Handheld devices, accessories, and other assets

   354,928  619,821 

Subtotal

   7,108,297   7,303,700 

Expected losses on trade receivables

   (773,771 (787,145

Total

   8,379,719     7,450,040     6,334,526   6,516,555 
  

 

   

 

 

The aging list of trade receivables is as follows:

 

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Current

   6,855,027     5,878,915     5,118,874    5,167,408 

Past-due up to 60 days

   1,296,612     1,388,330     527,459    672,673 

Past-due from 61 to 90 days

   146,608     136,200     104,694    131,798 

Past-due from 91 to 120 days

   121,916     113,212     99,299    132,562 

Past-due from 121 to 150 days

   124,887     102,139     83,083    104,628 

Over 150 days past-due

   395,808     345,031     1,174,888    1,094,631 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   8,940,858     7,963,827     7,108,297    7,303,700 
  

 

   

 

 

The movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts wereexpected credit losses on trade receivables are as follows:

 

Balance at JanJanuary 1, 20142018

   (654,042547,485

Acquisition of investments - PT PortugalExpected losses on trade receivables

   (652,964

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(684,017843,681

Trade receivables written off as uncollectible

   712,128976,998 

Foreign exchange differences

6,841

Transfer to assets held for sale

758,267

Balance in 2014IFRS 9 adoption (*)

   (513,787372,977

Allowance for doubtful accountsBalance at December 31, 2018

   (692,935787,145

Expected losses on trade receivables

(488,269

Trade receivables written off as uncollectible

   645,583501,643 

Balance in 2015at December 31, 2019

   (561,139773,771

 

9.(*)INCOME TAXES

Impact of the first-time recognition, at January 1, 2018, of IFRS 9 as a contra entry to Accumulated losses in Shareholders’ equity.

(a) Tax rate reconciliation

Income taxes encompass the income tax and the social contribution in Brazil. The income tax rate is 25% and the social contribution rate is 9%, an aggregate nominal tax rate of 34%. Income tax expense attributable to income (loss) from continuing operations was an income tax expense of R$3,379,927, R$758,268 and R$76,610 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Total income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were allocated as follows:

   2015   2014   2013 

Income (expenses) from continuing operations

   (3,379,927   (758,268   (76,610

Expenses from discontinued operations

   (327,115   (92,545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax recognized in earnings

   (3,707,042   (850,813   (76,610
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax recognized in other comprehensive income

   (194,020   243,333     (17,514

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations consists of:

   2015   2014   2013 

Income tax and social contribution

      

Current taxes

   (781,576   (622,001   (418,498

Deferred taxes

   (2,598,351   (136,267   341,888  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (3,379,927   (758,268   (76,610
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The tax rate reconciliation from continuing operation consists of the following:

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   2015   2014   2013 

Income (loss) before taxes (i)

   (5,324,970   64,287     681,033  

Income tax and social contribution

      

Income tax and social contribution at statutory rate (34%)

   1,810,490     (21,858   (231,552

Valuation allowance (ii)

   (4,755,151   5,848     (68,654

Effect of foreign rate differential (iii)

   (106,388   (23,795   (13,046

Tax effects on permanent additions (iv)

   (268,989   (688,719   (76,433

Tax effects on permanent exclusions

   114,052     376,241     280,844  

Tax effect of REFIS permanent additions (v)

     (443,401  

Tax incentives (basically, operating income) (vi)

   7,332     36,281     31,573  

Tax amnesty program (vii)

   (165,676   —       —    

Other

   (15,597   1,135     658  

Income tax and social contribution effect on profit or loss

   (3,379,927   (758,268   (76,610
10.

RECOVERABLE INCOME TAX AND DEFERRED TAXES ASSETS

 

   ASSETS 
  2019   2018 

Current recoverable taxes

    

Recoverable income tax (IRPJ) (i)

   209,513    287,472 

Recoverable social contribution (CSLL) (i)

   81,215    91,996 

IRRF/CSLL—withholding income taxes (ii)

   251,998    241,778 

Total current

   542,726    621,246 

Deferred recoverable taxes

    

Income tax and social contribution on temporary differences1

   99,175    23,050 

Totalnon-current

   99,175    23,050 

   LIABILITIES 
  2019   2018 

Current taxes payable

    

Income tax payable

   54,358    21,628 

Social contribution payable

   12,296    5,398 

Total current

   66,654    27,026 

See movements table below

(i)In 2013, substantially all pre tax income and income tax are related to Brazilian Companies. In 2015 and 2014 income before taxes and income tax for continuing operations is as follows:

                                                      
   2015 
   Brazil   Foreign
operations
   Total 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (4,428,005   (896,965   (5,324,970

Income tax

   (3,191,186   (188,741   (3,379,927

Current taxes

   (589,090   (192,486   (781,576

Deferred taxes

   (2,602,096   3,745     (2,598,351

                                                      
   2014 
   Brazil   Foreign
operations
   Total 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (145,581   209,868     64,287  

Income tax

   (615,406   (142,862   (758,268

Current taxes

   (479,061   (142,940   (622,001

Deferred taxes

   (136,345   78     (136,267

(ii)Refers to valuation allowance due to change in judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets. The change in the beginning-of-the year balance of the valuation allowance due to change in judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets amounts to R$2,845,521.
(iii)Refers to the effects of the difference between the applicable tax rate in Brazil and the tax rates applicable to other Group companies located abroad.
(iv)In 2015 the main effects of permanent addition refers to: (1) the impairment of Unitel available-for-sale investment which is not tax deductible in the amount of R$152 million (Note 26), (2) the impairment of goodwill and trademarks for the Telecommunication services in Brazil and impairment of goodwill related to África, which is not tax deductible in the amount of R$91 million and (3) nondeductible fines in the amount of R$25 million. In 2014 the main effects refers to the impairment of PT SGPS shares held subsidiary TMAR which is not tax deductible in the amount of R$266 million.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(v)In 2014, the main effects are linked to goodwill amortization (pre-merger period), settlement of principal, fine and interest utilizing tax loss carryforwards as permitted by Article 2 of Law 12996/2014 and Article 33 of Law 13043/2014.
(vi)These tax incentives correspond mainly to a 75% reduction in the current income tax due on operating income obtained as a result of telecommunication services rendered in certain northern and northeast regions of Brasil, where the Company holds facilities for the purpose of rendering those services. This tax benefit is usually granted for a 10 year period, limited up to January 1, 2024.
(vii)Refers to uncertain tax position taken in prior periods which were assessed by the taxing authorities. Although the Company believed in prior periods that these positions would be more-likely-than-not of being sustained, it has decided to adhere to PRORELIT and avoid substantial costs to keep on going discussions with government. PRORELIT program allowed taxpayers to settle federal tax debts accrued prior to June 30th, 2015, excluding tax debts that are subject to tax installment payments.

In order to enroll, tax payers were requested to resign of their litigation rights with respect to the settled debt amount and pay at least 30% of their outstanding consolidated tax debt accrued through June 30th, 2015 in cash. The remaining 70% of the debt would be settled with tax loss carryforwards. Apart from the initial 30% down payment, no guarantees or collateral is needed.

The Company has submitted its application for PRORELIT to settle several tax debts. Nevertheless, tax authorities have a five years term to ratify the amounts of tax loss carryforwards utilized by taxpayers.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of total unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2015 as follows:

   2015   2014 

Balance, beginning of year

   84,650     84,650  

Increase related to prior year tax position

   165,676    

Settlements

   (250,326  

Balance, end of year

     84,650  

(b) Significant components of current and deferred taxes

   ASSETS 
  2015   2014 

Current recoverable taxes

    

Recoverable income tax (IRPJ) (i)

   416,125     485,929  

Recoverable social contribution (CSLL) (i)

   153,059     182,772  

IRRF/CSLL - withholding income taxes (ii)

   346,389     428,488  

Income taxes recoverable (v)

   147,278     60,944  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

     1,062,851       1,158,133  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   LIABILITIES 
  2015   2014 

Current taxes payable

    

Income tax payable

   211,571     306,366  

Social contribution payable

   128,053     170,916  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

        339,624          477,282  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2015   2014 

Deferred taxes assets

    

Income tax and social contribution on merged goodwill (iii)

   2,423,763     1,605,513  

Income tax and social contribution on temporary differences (iv)

   3,885,435     2,499,243  

Income tax and social contribution on tax loss carryforwards (iv)

   4,134,378     3,447,938  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total - deferred taxes assets

   10,443,576     7,552,694  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Business combinations – other intangibles

   (3,047,832   (3,464,404

Pension plan assets

   (299,574   (176,397
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (3,347,406   (3,640,801
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Valuation allowance (iv)

   (6,239,713   (217,655
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred taxes, net

     856,457     3,694,238  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(i)Refer mainly to prepaid income tax and social contribution that will be offset against federal taxes payable in the future.

(ii)

Refer to corporatewithholding income tax (IRRF) credits on short-termcash investments, related partiesderivatives, intragroup loans, government entities, and other amounts that are used as deductions from income tax payable for the years, and social contribution withheld at source on services provided to government agencies.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Movements in deferred income tax and social contribution

   Balance at
December 31, 2018
  Recognized
in deferred
tax benefit/
expenses
  Recognized
directly in
equity
  Add-backs/
Offsets
   Balance at
December 31, 2019
 

Deferred tax assets arising on:

       

Temporary differences

       

Provisions

   1,244,246   (68,999     1,175,247 

Provisions for suspended taxes

   29,555   134,999      164,554 

Provisions for pension funds and impacts of (IAS 19 R)

   (14,095  (3,341  3,331     (14,105

Expected losses on trade receivables

   478,827   (46,407     432,420 

Profit sharing

   94,504   (13,185     81,319 

Foreign exchange differences

   1,403,193   333,740      1,736,933 

Merged goodwill (i)

   1,690,508   (278,759     1,411,749 

Other temporary add-backs and deductions

   177,085   773,610   2,557     953,252 

Onerous obligation

   1,527,924   449,900      1,977,824 

Deferred taxes on temporary differences

   6,631,747   1,281,558   5,888     7,919,193 

CSLL tax loss carryforwards

   13,703,529   1,033,425   25,095   38    14,762,087 

Total deferred tax assets

   20,335,276   2,314,983   30,983   38    22,681,280 

Deferred tax liabilities

       

Temporary differences and income tax and social contribution of goodwill (ii)

   (2,532,682  235,338      (2,297,344

Allowance for impairment loss (iii)

   (17,779,544  (2,474,234  (30,983    (20,284,761

Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)

   23,050   76,087(*)    38    99,175 

(*)

The expenses on deferred taxes disclosed in Note 6 include R$7,046 in deferred taxes of foreign operations classified asheld-for-sale assets.

(iii)(i)

Refer to: (i) deferred income tax and social contribution assets calculated as tax benefit originating from the goodwill paid on acquisition byof the Company and recognized by the merged companies in the course of 2009. The realization of the tax basiscredit arises from the amortization of the goodwill balance based on the STFC license and in the appreciation of property, plant and equipment, the utilization of which is estimated to occur through 2025, and (ii) deferred income tax and social contribution assets originating from the goodwill paid on the acquisition of interests byin the Company in 2008-2011, recognized by the companies merged with and into TmarPartTelemar Participações S.A. (“TmarPart”) and by TmarPart merged with and into the Company on September 1, 2015, which was based on the Company’s expected future earningsprofitability and the amortization of which is estimated to occur through 2025 (Note 1).2025.

(iv)(ii)For

Refers basically to the year ended December 31, 2015, total valuation allowance increasedtax effects on the appreciation of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, merged from R$217,655 million to R$6,239,713 million, reflecting valuation allowance totaling R$6,022,058 recognized for the companies that, as at December 31, 2015, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits,TmarPart.

(iii)

The Company, based on consistent assumptions and timing used in the analysisschedule of the potential impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, against which tax assets could be offset. Most of our deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance to the amount supported by reversing taxable temporary difference. The deferred tax assets not offset by valuation allowance are dependent upon theexpected generation of future pretax income in certain of our tax-paying components in Brazil that have a history of profitability and an expectation of continued profitability. Management believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets that are not subject to the valuation allowance. However, deferred income tax assets can be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income, duringsupported by a technical feasibility study and the carryforward period are reduced.comparison with the estimate of the annual realization amount of asset and liability temporary differences, revised its deferred taxes recovery estimate and identified and recognized an allowance at recoverable amount.

The net changed in valuation allowance in 2014 was R$217,655. No valuation allowance was recorded prior to 2014.

Thestock of tax loss carryfowards ofcarryforwards in Brazil and foreign subsidiaries is approximately R$12,159,935, corresponding32,805,092 and R$14,433,424, and corresponds to R$4,134,378 million of11,153,731 and R$3,608,356 in deferred tax assets, do not expire, and mayrespectively, which can be carried forward indefinitely.indefinitely and offset against taxes payable in the future.

 

(v)Refer mainly to prior years’ prepaid income tax and social contribution that will be offset against federal taxes payable.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Movements in deferred income tax and social contribution
11.

OTHER TAXES

 

   Balance in
2014
  Recognized in
deferred tax
income/
expenses
  Other
comprehensive
income
  Other  Balance in
2015
 

Deferred tax assets arising on:

      

Temporary differences

      

Contingencies

   1,668,750    (129,407    1,539,343  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   592,279    66,591      658,870  

Profit sharing

   86,534    (22,291    64,243  

Foreign exchange differences

   556,389    1,221,972      1,778,361  

Merged goodwill (i)

   1,605,513    (164,517   982,767    2,423,763  

Hedge accounting (ii)

   (63,695   271,303     207,608  

Other temporary items

   (341,015  (89,489   67,514    (362,990

Tax loss carryforwards

      

Income tax loss carryforwards

   2,513,846    731,485     (234,122  3,011,209  

Social contribution carryforwards

   934,093    273,339     (84,263  1,123,169  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total - deferred taxes assets

   7,552,694    1,887,683    271,303    731,896    10,443,576  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Business combinations – other intangibles

   (3,464,404  416,572      (3,047,832

Provisions for pension funds (ii)

   (176,397  (68,500  (54,677   (299,574
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (3,640,801  348,072    (54,677   (3,347,406
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

   (217,655  (4,755,151  (216,626  (1,050,281  (6,239,713

Total net deferred tax

   3,694,238    (2,519,396   (318,385  856,457  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   ASSETS 
  2019   2018 

Recoverable State VAT (ICMS) (i)

   1,301,684    1,240,353 

PIS and COFINS (ii)

   2,736,009    215,860 

Other

   47,257    63,015 

Total

   4,084,950    1,519,228 

Current

   1,089,391    803,252 

Non-current

   2,995,559    715,976 

   LIABILITIES 
  2019   2018 

State VAT (ICMS)

   526,618    556,693 

ICMS Convention No. 69/1998

   220,467    34,113 

PIS and COFINS (iii)

   574,063    235,319 

FUST/FUNTTEL/broadcasting fees (iv)

   669,193    655,022 

Other (v)

   120,460    181,437 

Total

   2,110,801    1,662,584 

Current

   886,763    1,033,868 

Non-current

   1,224,038    628,716 

 

(i)As a result of the merger of TmarPart with and into Oi on September 1, 2015, the Company recognized the income tax and social contribution benefit arising on the utilization of goodwill paid on the acquisition of interests in the Company in 2008-2011, recognized by the companies merged with and into TmarPart and by TmarPart merged with and into the Company, which was based on the Company’s expected future earnings.
(ii)Please see statements of comprehensive income for impacts attributed to other comprehensive income items as well as reclassification to earnings.

10.OTHER TAXES

   ASSETS 
  2015   2014 

Recoverable State VAT (ICMS) (i)

   1,285,800     1,512,543  

Taxes on revenue (PIS and COFINS)

   200,029     181,772  

Other

   97,056     101,851  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,582,885     1,796,166  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   922,986     1,054,255  

Non-current

   659,899     741,911  

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   LIABILITIES 
  2015   2014 

State VAT (ICMS)

   759,922     709,126  

ICMS Agreement No. 69/1998

   33,998     80,287  

Taxes on revenue (PIS and COFINS)

   668,888     664,278  

FUST/FUNTTEL/broadcasting fees

   861,212     807,576  

Other

   153,968     281,059  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,477,988     2,542,326  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   1,553,651     1,667,599  

Non-current

   924,337     874,727  

(i)Recoverable ICMS arises mostly from prepaid taxes and credits claimed on purchases of property, plant and equipment, which can be offset against ICMS payable within 48 months, pursuant to Supplementary Law 102/2000.

(ii)

The Company and its subsidiaries filed legal proceedings to claim the right to deduct ICMS from the PIS and COFINS tax bases and the recovery of past unduly paid amounts, within the relevant statute of limitations.

In 2019, the 1st and 2nd Region Federal Courts (Brasília and Rio de Janeiro) issued final and unappealable decisions favorable to the Company on two of the three main lawsuits of the Company relating to the discussion about thenon-levy of PIS and COFINS on ICMS.

These credits were cleared for offset by the Federal Revenue Service between May and October 2019 so that the Company has been using them to pay federal taxes due since June 2019. The total amount of the credit was approximately R$3 billion, added to the three lawsuits.

(iii)

Refers basically to the Social Integration Program Tax on Revenue (PIS) and Social Security Funding Tax on Revenue (COFINS) on revenue, financial income, and other income.

(iv)

The Company and its subsidiaries Telemar and Oi Móvel filed lawsuits to discuss the correct calculation of the contribution to the FUST and in the course of the lawsuits made escrow deposits to suspend its collection. These discussions are also being judged by higher courts and a possible transformation of the deposited amounts into definitive payments should not occur within two (2) years.

(v)

Consisting primarily of monetary corrections to suspended taxes and withholding tax on intragroup loans and interest on capital.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

11.12.

JUDICIAL DEPOSITS

In some situations the Company makes, as ordered by legal requirementcourts or even at its own discretion to provide guarantees, judicial deposits to ensure the continuity of ongoing lawsuits. These judicial deposits can be required for lawsuits with a likelihood of loss, as assessed by the Company based on the opinion of its legal counsel,counselors, as probable, possible, or remote. The Company recognizes in current assets the expected amount to be redeemed from judicial deposits or to offset judicial deposits against the provision for contingencies in the next fiscal year.

   2015   2014 

Civil

   9,459,735     8,919,658  

Tax

   2,548,720     2,466,187  

Labor

   2,368,902     2,007,822  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   14,377,357     13,393,667  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   1,258,227     1,133,639  

Non-current

   13,119,130     12,260,028  

As set forth by relevant legislation, judicial deposits are adjusted for inflation.monetary correction.

   2019  2018 

Civil

   5,027,848   5,849,978 

Tax

   2,301,986   2,337,508 

Labor

   883,125   1,197,144 

Subtotal:

   8,212,959   9,384,630 

Estimated loss (i)

   (47,112  (649,910

Total

   8,165,847   8,734,720 

Current

   1,514,464   1,715,934 

Non-current

   6,651,383   7,018,786 

(i)

This amount represents the estimated loss of balances of judicial deposits, which are in the process of reconciliation with the obtained statements.

13.

PREPAID EXPENSES

   2019   2018 

Costs incurred on the performance of a contract (IFRS 15)

   1,016,337    912,538 

Advertising and publicity

   55,695    135,049 

Bank guarantee

   31,297    40,690 

Insurance

   25,807    48,865 

Contractual prepaid expenses

     47,771 

Other

   124,944    81,590 

Total

   1,254,080    1,266,503 

Current

   670,344    743,953 

Non-current

   583,736    522,550 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

12.14.INVESTMENTS

OTHER ASSETS

 

   2015   2014 

Joint venture

   63,837     74,803  

Investments in associates

   39,003     21,558  

Tax incentives, net of allowances for losses

   31,579     31,579  

Other investments

   20,471     20,471  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   154,890     148,411  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2019   2018 

Advances to and amounts recoverable from suppliers

   767,900    621,376 

Amounts receivable from the sale of property, plant and equipment items

   302,947    305,155 

Amounts receivable

   53,406    202,834 

Advances to employees

   79,830    69,635 

Other

   85,739    131,532 

Total

   1,289,822    1,330,532 

Current

   852,155    1,079,670 

Non-current

   437,667    250,862 

15.

INVESTMENTS

   2019   2018 

Joint arrangements

   28,632    31,488 

Investments in associates

   48,578    44,124 

Tax incentives, net of allowances for losses

   31,876    31,876 

Other investments

   24,679    10,352 

Total

   133,765    117,840 

Summary of the movements in investment balances

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Balance at January 1, 20142018

   173,640136,510 

Share of profitsresults of subsidiariesinvestees

   (5,88113,492

Subsidiaries’ dividendsShare of subsidiaries’ and interest on capitalassociates’ equity in investees

   (4,9682,270)

Reclassification of equity in investees to held-for-sale assets

5,491 

Other

   (14,3808,399

Balance in 2014at December 31, 2018

   148,411117,840 

Share of profitsresults of subsidiariesinvestees

   (21,8835,174

Associates’Subsidiaries’ and associates’ share of other comprehensive income

   11,2662,469

Reclassification of equity in investees to held-for-sale assets

3,514 

Other

   17,09615,116 

Balance in 2015at December 31, 2019

   154,890133,765 

 

13.PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

   Works in
progress
  Automatic
switching
equipment
  Transmission
and other
equipment (i)
  Infrastructure  Buildings  Other assets  Total 

Cost of PP&E (gross amount)

        

Balance at Jan 1, 2014

   4,569,682    19,476,331    45,332,907    26,991,988    3,598,183    5,201,130    105,170,221  

Acquisition of investments - PT Portugal

   452,844    6,004,681    4,537,199    16,357,177    2,957,154    9,693,740    40,002,795  

Additions

   3,029,820    63,899    997,941    308,985    92,788    271,954    4,765,387  

Write-offs

   (2,083  (4,595  (75,547  (105,159  (2,146  (8,662  (198,192

Transfers

   (4,944,777  317,773    6,045,939    (1,711,939  592,592    (368,441  (68,853

Foreign exchange differences

   20,468    288,829    255,552    785,557    148,022    469,466    1,967,894  

Transfers to assets held for sale

   (468,545  (6,338,824  (4,900,950  (17,171,247  (2,995,379  (10,373,620  (42,248,565

Balance in 2014

   2,657,409    19,808,094    52,193,041    25,455,362    4,391,214    4,885,567    109,390,687  

Additions

   2,893,198    14,274    270,031    15,792    185,588    243,459    3,622,342  

Write-offs

    (4,737  (68,650  (521,106  (80,208  (15,659  (690,360

Transfers

   (3,894,026  70,070    1,992,540    1,502,411    (209,257  538,262   

Other

     135    780     18,370    19,285  

Balance in 2015

   1,656,581    19,887,701    54,387,097    26,453,239    4,287,337    5,669,999    112,341,954  

Accumulated depreciation

        

Balance at Jan 1, 2014

    (17,075,110  (34,307,252  (21,505,346  (2,568,768  (3,988,687  (79,445,163

Acquisition of investments - PT Portugal

    (5,685,512  (3,169,003  (11,029,655  (1,238,292  (7,840,705  (28,963,167

Depreciation expenses

    (458,367  (2,700,926  (774,053  (189,874  (585,636  (4,708,856

Write-offs

    3,521    61,653    51,428    (5,016  7,921    119,507  

Transfers

    (3,027  (2,132,253  2,022,793    351,649    (145,499  93,663  

Foreign exchange differences

    (275,108  (168,315  (534,544  (63,973  (393,646  (1,435,586

Transfers to assets held for sale

    6,032,368    3,559,523    11,706,376    1,273,000    8,621,957    31,193,224  

Balance in 2014

    (17,461,235  (38,856,573  (20,063,001  (2,441,274  (4,324,295  (83,146,378

Depreciation expenses

    (399,628  (2,225,984  (1,048,933  (107,140  (253,892  (4,035,577

Write-offs

    3,496    66,245    519,546    63,234    14,433    666,954  

Transfers

    (29,376  94,258    (5,608  53,913    (113,187 

Other

     (109  (169  0    (8,854  (9,132

Balance in 2015

    (17,886,743  (40,922,163  (20,598,165  (2,431,267  (4,685,795  (86,524,133

Property, plant and equipment, net

        

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Balance in 2014

   2,657,409     2,346,859    13,336,468    5,392,361    1,949,940    561,272    26,244,309  

Balance in 2015

   1,656,581     2,000,958    13,464,934    5,855,074    1,856,070    984,204    25,817,821  

Annual depreciation rate (average)

     11  10  8  8  12 

 

(i)16.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

   Works in
progress
  Automatic
switching
equipment
  Transmission
and other
equipment (1)
  Infrastructure  Buildings  Right of
use -
leases
  Other
assets
  Total 

Cost of PP&E (gross amount)

         

Balance at January 1, 2018

   3,434,113   20,008,955   59,082,061   28,341,491   4,471,481    6,217,467   121,555,568 

Additions

   5,117,872   487   383,088   388,988   10,721    39,471   5,940,627 

Write-offs

   (47,465   (45,211  (601,087  (3,344   (3,403  (700,510

Transfers

   (5,152,907  68,518   2,672,783   2,214,139   (15,168   212,635  

Balance at December 31, 2018

   3,351,613   20,077,960   62,092,721   30,343,531   4,463,690    6,466,170   126,795,685 

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

        8,167,932    8,167,932 

Contractual changes

        520,809    520,809 

Additions

   6,870,257    226,022   295,795   5,054   283,494   96,435   7,777,057 

Write-offs

   (104,781   (61,464  (1,059,118   (136,734  (421  (1,362,518

Transfers

   (7,958,762  135,576   5,076,356   2,463,974   39,025    243,831  

Transfer to held-for-sale assets

      (50,854  (271,292    (322,146

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

         781   781 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,158,327   20,213,536   67,333,635   31,993,328   4,236,477   8,835,501   6,806,796   141,577,600 

Accumulated depreciation

         

Balance at January 1, 2018

    (18,648,010)   (45,677,425)   (22,230,047)   (2,758,012)    (5,253,427)   (94,566,921) 

Depreciation expenses

    (292,524  (2,251,574  (1,246,471  (90,348   (407,396  (4,288,313

Write-offs

     40,387   442,589   215    1,921   485,112 

Transfers

    (36  (151  (353  33,570    (33,030 

Balance at December 31, 2018

    (18,940,570)   (47,888,763)   (23,034,282)   (2,814,575)    (5,691,932)   (98,370,122) 

Depreciation expenses

    (271,449  (2,519,706  (1,456,608  (101,432  (952,225  (247,836  (5,549,256

Write-offs

     53,452   979,614    22,315   (7,514  1,047,867 

Transfers

    85   (565  (787  776    491  

Transfer to held-for-sale assets

      16,267   189,198     205,465 

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

         (720  (720

Balance at December 31, 2019

    (19,211,934)   (50,355,582)   (23,495,796)   (2,726,033)   (929,910)   (5,947,511)   (102,666,766) 

PP&E, net

         

Balance at December 31, 2018

   3,351,613   1,137,390   14,203,958   7,309,249   1,649,115    774,238   28,425,563 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,158,327   1,001,602   16,978,053   8,497,532   1,510,444   7,905,591   859,285   38,910,834 

Annual depreciation rate (average)

    10%   12%   10%   9%   11%   15%  

(1)

Transmission and other equipment includesinclude transmission and data communication equipment.

Additional disclosures

Pursuant to ANATEL’s concession agreements, allthe property, plant and equipment items capitalized byof the CompanyConcessionaires that are indispensable for the provision of the services granted underSwitched Fixed-line Telephony Services (“STFC”) provided for in said agreements are considered returnable assets and are part of the concession’s cost. These assets are surrendered to ANATEL upon the termination of not renewed concession agreements.assets.

As at December 31, 2015,2019, the residual balance of the Company’s returnable assets is R$8,055,8769,048,877 (R$8,199,356 at December 31, 2014)8,218,006 in 2018) and consistconsists of assets and installations in progress, switching and transmission equipment, payphones, outside network equipment, power equipment, and systems and operation support equipment.

In the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, financial charges and transaction costs incurred on works in progress were capitalized at the average rate of 10%7% per year (9% in 2014) and totaling R$15,463 (R$60,275 in 2014).year.

 

14.INTANGIBLE ASSETS

   Goodwill  Intangibles in
progress
  Data processing
systems
  Regulatory
licenses (i)
  Customer
portfolio
  Other  Total 

Cost of intangibles (gross amount)

        

Balance at Jan 1, 2014

   409,012    184,387    6,657,925    18,994,358     1,588,916    27,834,598  

Acquisition of investments - PT Portugal

   10,574,704    52,819    575,983    1,656,050    3,215,523    3,091,687    19,166,766  

Additions

    487,895    248,470      282,688    1,019,053  

Write-offs

    (1,574     (15,031  (16,605

Transfers

    (519,904  451,615      36,401    (31,888

Foreign exchange differences

   507,532    1,256    44,200    78,963    153,469    124,238    909,658  

Transfers to assets held for sale

   (11,082,236  (48,161  (667,884  (1,736,767  (3,368,992  (3,291,736  (20,195,776

Balance in 2014

   409,012    156,718    7,310,309    18,992,604     1,817,163    28,685,806  

Additions

    438,445    136,982      51,331    626,758  

Transfers

    (469,322  459,078      10,244    0  

Other

   92,453     1,382       93,835  

Balance in 2015

   501,465    125,841    7,907,751    18,992,604     1,878,738    29,406,399  

Accumulated amortization

         0  

Balance at Jan 1, 2014

     (5,348,057  (6,677,334   (1,143,075  (13,168,466

Acquisition of investments - PT Portugal

     (428,721  (514,850   (2,155,564  (3,099,135

Amortization expenses

     (571,298  (1,210,359  (169,982  (424,030  (2,375,669

Write-offs

     11,673    0     26,373    38,046  

Transfers

     (28,171  (26,246  (7,970  (89,734  (152,121

Foreign exchange differences

     (260    260   

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Movements in the rights of use—leases

 

Transfers to assets held for sale

      489,838    578,878    177,952     2,378,692    3,625,360  

Balance in 2014

      (5,874,996  (7,849,911    (1,407,078  (15,131,985

Amortization expenses

      (662,068  (1,137,568    (191,901  (1,991,537

Other

      (1,276      (1,276

Balance in 2015

      (6,538,340  (8,987,479    (1,598,979  (17,124,798

Intangible assets, net

          

Balance in 2014

   409,012    156,718     1,435,313    11,142,693      410,085    13,553,821  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal 2015

   501,465    125,841     1,369,411    10,005,125      279,759    12,281,601  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Impairment Losses

   (501,465         (501,465

Balance in 2015

    125,841     1,369,411    10,005,125      279,759    11,780,136  

Annual amortization rate (average)

      20  9    16 
   Towers  Physical
space
  Stores  Vehicles  Real
estate
  Total 

Balance January 1, 2019

       

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

   7,353,507   521,523   117,480   93,615   81,807   8,167,932 

Contractual changes

   500,690   6,614   6,680    6,825   520,809 

Additions

   65,559   29,008   13,555   174,455   917   283,494 

Write-offs

   (35,836  (82,091  (8,701  (8,804  (1,302  (136,734

Balance at December 31, 2019

   7,883,920   475,054   129,014   259,266   88,247   8,835,501 

Accumulated depreciation

       

Balance at January 1, 2019

       

Depreciation expenses

   (737,439  (92,896  (31,456  (70,787  (19,647  (952,225

Write-offs

   13,176   3,967   1,580   3,028   564   22,315 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   (724,263)   (88,929)   (29,876)   (67,759)   (19,083)   (929,910) 

Right of use, net

       

Balance at January 1, 2019

       

Balance at December 31, 2019

   7,159,657   386,125   99,138   191,507   69,164   7,905,591 

 

(i)17.Includes mainly

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

   Intangibles
in progress
  Data
processing
systems
  Regulatory
licenses
  Other  Total 

Cost of intangible assets (gross amount)

      

Balance at January 1, 2018

   17,047   8,743,013   18,602,742   1,812,090   29,174,892 

Additions

   263,305   4,524    73,471   341,300 

Write-offs

   (14     (14

Transfers

   (253,143  234,157    18,986  

Balance at December 31, 2018

   27,195   8,981,694   18,602,742   1,904,547   29,516,178 

Additions

   369,695   8,402    44,248   422,345 

Transfers

   (384,526  410,487    (25,961 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   12,364   9,400,583   18,602,742   1,922,834   29,938,523 

Accumulated amortization

      

Balance at January 1, 2018

    (7,673,193)   (11,559,717)   (1,591,297)   (20,824,207) 

Amortization expenses

    (443,268  (900,360  (108,139  (1,451,767

Impairment loss expenses (see Note 5 (iii))

     (291,758   (291,758

Balance at December 31, 2018

    (8,116,461)   (12,751,835)   (1,699,436)   (22,567,732) 

Amortization expenses

    (381,874  (772,179  (107,851  (1,261,904

Transfers

    8    (8 

Impairment loss expenses (see Note 5 (iii))

     (2,111,022   (2,111,022

Balance at December 31, 2019

    (8,498,327)   (15,635,036)   (1,807,295)   (25,940,658) 

Intangible assets, net

      

Balance at December 31, 2018

   27,195   865,233   5,850,907   205,111   6,948,446 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   12,364   902,256   2,967,706   115,539   3,997,865 

Annual amortization rate (average)

    20  20  23 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

18.

TRADE PAYABLES

   2019  2018 

ANATEL (*)

   7,572,101   7,147,137 

Services

   3,423,011   3,397,413 

Infrastructure, network and plant maintenance materials

   2,607,888   2,861,712 

Rental of polls and rights-of-way

   118,966   191,723 

Other

   289,508   647,856 

Adjustment to present value (**)

   (5,124,107  (5,426,971

Total

   8,887,367   8,818,870 

Current

   5,593,940   5,225,862 

Non-current

   3,293,427   3,593,008 

Trade payables subject to the Judicial Reorganization

   4,093,058   3,794,610 

Trade payables not subject to the Judicial Reorganization

   4,794,309   5,024,260 

Total

   8,887,367   8,818,870 

(*)

Refers for prepetition claims of the fair valueManagement Regulatory Agency of intangible assets relatedthe Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU) to purchasebe settle pursuant to the JRP (see Note 24).

(**)

The calculation takes into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rate from 16.4% per year to 17,2% per year, considering the maturities of control of BrT (now Oi, S.A.)each liabilities (ANATEL and other trade payables).

 

15.19.TRADE PAYABLES

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

   2015   2014 

Infrastructure, network and plant maintenance materials

   1,282,493     1,708,777  

Services

   3,059,394     1,985,629  

Rental of polls and rights-of-way

   372,103     445,642  

Other

   321,803     219,737  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,035,793     4,359,785  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2019   2018 

Liabilities

    

Non-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts

   1,152   

Total

   1,152   

Current

   1,152   

 

16.20.LOANS

BORROWINGS AND FINANCING

Borrowings and financing by type

 

  2015   2014   Maturity (principal and
interest)
  TIR %   2019 2018  Contractual maturity 

Senior notes

   38,670,111     12,737,364      
  2019 2018  Principal   Interest 

Foreign currency Senior Notes

 Jul 2025    Semiannual 

Public debentures

   7,110,737  6,788,519  Aug 2023 to Feb 2035    Semiannual 

Financial institutions

      

Local currency

   1,090,716     1,136,801    Dec 2015 to Sep 2016   11.62        

Foreign currency (i)

   37,579,395     11,600,563    Dec 2015 to Feb 2022   15.24  

Financial institutions

   17,540,795     15,778,442      

CCB – Bank Credit Note

   2,416,314     4,503,810    Dec 2015 to Jan 2028   12.08  

Certificates of Real Estate Receivables (CRI)

   1,397,504     1,496,674    Dec 2015 to Aug 2022   14.10  

Development Banks and Export Credit Agencies

   10,986,710     9,777,958    Dec 2015 to Dec 2033   12.28  

Revolver credit facility

   2,740,267      Dec 2015 to Oct 2016   21.65  

Public debentures

   4,144,760     7,807,389    Dec 2015 to Jul 2021   11.82  
  

 

   

 

     

BNDES

   3,947,137  3,616,074  Mar 2024 to Feb 2033    Monthly 

Other

   2,071,209  1,905,786  Jan 2020 to Feb 2035    Monthly and semiannual 

Foreign currency

   6,725,591  6,353,322  Aug 2023 to Feb 2035    Semiannual 

Foreign currency multilateral financing

   360,161  326,376  Aug 2024 to Feb 2030    Semiannual 

Default payment

      

Local currency

   207,035  207,035  Feb 2038 to Feb 2042    Single installment 

Foreign currency

   4,239,168  4,125,317  Feb 2038 to Feb 2042   

Subtotal

   60,355,666     36,323,195         31,641,855  30,390,692    
  

 

   

 

     

Incurred debt issuance cost

   (498,249   (473,800       (13,911 (12,126   
  

 

   

 

     

Debt discount (*)

   (13,401,195 (13,928,660   

Total

   59,857,417     35,849,395         18,226,749  16,449,906    
  

 

   

 

     

Current

   11,809,598     4,463,728         326,388  672,894    

Non-current

   48,047,819     31,385,667         17,900,361  15,777,012    

 

(i)(*)On June 2, 2015, PT Portugal was sold

The calculation takes into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rates that range from 12.6% per year to Altice S.A. As part16.4% per year, depending on the maturities and currency of the PT Portugal sale process, the debt of PTIF previously classified as liabilities associated to held-for-sale assets remained with Oi, together with cash in similar amount, and was reclassified to the Company’s debt. The original debt consists basically of EMTN notes issued, maturing in 2016-2025.each instrument.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Debt issuance costs by type

 

   2019   2018 

Financial institutions

   13,306    11,481 

Public debentures

   605    645 

Total

   13,911    12,126 

Current

   1,404    1,290 

Non-current

   12,507    10,836 

Breakdown of the debtDebt breakdown by currency

 

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Euro

   24,221,508     2,412,691     311,309    198,931 

US dollar

   22,713,644     12,368,551     9,209,982    8,617,835 

Brazilian reais

   12,922,265     21,068,153     8,705,458    7,633,140 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   59,857,417     35,849,395     18,226,749    16,449,906 
  

 

   

 

 

Breakdown of the debtDebt breakdown by index

 

  2015   2014   Index/rate   2019   2018 

Fixed rate

   39,892,444     14,146,444     1.75% p.a. – 10.00% p.a.    9,078,998    8,562,117 

LIBOR

   8,812,005     2,762,046  

CDI

   6,347,119     9,811,490     80% CDI    4,694,687    3,949,639 

TJLP

   3,148,581     5,149,392     2.95% p.a. + TJLP    3,945,972    3,614,820 

IPCA

   1,475,381     3,798,431  

INPC

   181,887     181,592  
  

 

   

 

 

TR

   0% p.a.    22,662    14,430 

Other

   0% p.a.    484,430    308,900 

Total

   59,857,417     35,849,395       18,226,749    16,449,906 
  

 

   

 

 

Maturity schedule of the long-term debt and debt issuance costs allocation schedule

 

   Debt 

2016

   11,927,129  

2017

   8,495,856  

2018

   6,532,989  

2019

   7,072,157  

2020

   14,563,635  

2021 and following years

   11,763,900  
  

 

 

 

Total

   60,355,666  
  

 

 

 

Description of main borrowings and financing

Senior Notes - foreign and local currency

In June 2015, Oi Holanda issued senior notes in the amount of €600 million, bearing interest at 5.625% per annum and maturing in 2021, the proceeds of which are to be used to refinance Oi’s and its subsidiaries’ debt. Using this issue’s proceeds, the Company bought back a total of €148 million in previously issued notes maturing in February 2016, bearing interest at 5.625% and maturing in March 2016, bearing interest at 5.242%. Additionally, the Company notes maturing in February 2016, bearing interest at 5.625%, the notes maturing in March 2017, bearing interest at 5.242%, and the notes maturing in December 2017, bearing interest of 5.125% were exchanged for newly issued notes totaling €173 million.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

In July 2015, Portugal Telecom International Finance (PTIF) rebought for immediate cancelation 169,793 Notes from holders that opted to exercise the right to sell the retail bond’s senior notes issued in July 2012 originally amounting to €400 million.

As at December 31, 2015 the Company held own debentures acquired in the market for approximately US$33 million, which it retains in its portfolio for cancellation or to be held to maturity.

Financial institutions

Development Banks and Export Credit Agencies

The Company and its subsidiaries obtained financing facilities with BNDES and other development banks from the North and Northeast regions to finance and the upgrading of their nationwide fixed and mobile networks and to meet their regulatory obligations and obligations to the Export Credit Agencies of financing part of the investments in equipment and services that incorporate international technology. The main export credit agencies with that are the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ counterparties are: SEK – Swedish Export Corporation; CDB – China Development Bank; ONDD – Office National Du Ducroire; and FEC – Finnish Export Credit.

In February 2015, US$42.8 million (R$123.2 million) were disbursed under a US$ 257 million financing agreement entered into by the Company with ONDD (“Office National Du Ducroire/Nationale Delcrederedienst”) in March 2013, to finance part of our investments.

In March 2015, US$141.3 million (R$461.1 million) were disbursed under a US$397.4 million financing agreement entered into by Oi with Finnvera (“Finnish Export Credit Ltd”) in October 2014, to finance part of our investments.

In December 2015, TMAR obtained new credit facilities with CDB - China Development Bank totaling US$1,200 million aimed at supporting the refinancing of its debt and the debt of its parent company Oi and financing the purchase of equipment and services from Huawei Technologies. The US$632.5 (R$2,515 million) was disbursed.

The export credit facility guaranteed by EKN contained a requirement to prepay all outstanding amounts in the event that our credit rating was downgraded below Ba2 by Moody’s or BB by Fitch. As a result of the actions by these rating agencies, the Company was required to prepay the outstanding principal amount under this export credit agreement of R$202 million in April 2016.

Revolver credit facility

Disbursements from the revolver credit facility entered into by Oi with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and RBS Securities Inc. included US$1,000 million in October 2011, and US$300 million (R$955.7 million) and US$400 million (R$1,167.7 million), in May 2015 and April, respectively. These amounts are intended to provide working capital to Oi and its subsidiaries or for other purposes in general.

In September 2015, the Company prepaid the total disbursed amounting to R$1,300 million of the revolver credit facility raised with a syndicate of commercial banks, consisting of Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, HSBC, and Santander. This facility totals R$1,500 million.

Public debentures

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

In 2015, the Company rebought and immediately cancelled the following publicly distributed nonconvertible, unsecured debentures: (1) 38,965 debentures of the 9th Issue 1st Series; (2) 155,713 debentures of the 9th Issue 2nd Series; (3) 24,002 5th Issue debentures of the 5th Issue 2nd Series, and (4) 100 debentures of the 7th Issue.

   Long-term debt   Debt discount   Debt issuance costs 
   2019 

2021

   3,953    887,351    1,811 

2022

   970    887,351    1,811 

2023

   313,181    887,351    1,811 

2024

   773,745    884,980    1,811 

2025 and thereafter

   30,222,214    9,854,162    5,263 

Total

   31,314,063    13,401,195    12,507 

Guarantees

BNDES financing facilities are originally collateralized by receivables of the Company and its subsidiaries TMARTelemar and Oi Móvel. The Company provides guarantees to its subsidiaries TMARTelemar and Oi Móvel for such financing facilities, totaling R$2,6842,937 million.

Beginning May 5, 2014, the outstanding EMTN notes of subsidiary PTIF have been guaranteed by Oi amounting to R$19,228.

Covenants

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to some covenants existing in certain loan and financing agreements, ofbased on financial ratios, including the Grossdebt-to-EBITDA ratio. The Company and subsidiaries TMAR and Oi Móvel with the BNDES and other financial institutions, and the debentures issued contain covenants that require the Oi and/or TMAR, as applicable, to maintain certain financial ratios. Compliance with these covenants is determined eithermonitors on a quarterly or an annual basis depending on the financing agreement.

In 2015, Oi renegotiated thethese terms of all of its debt covenants to a ratio of 6.00:1.00 total net debt-to-EBITDA. For some contracts this ratio should be revised back to its original terms during 2016 while for others this ratio will be in place until the end of 2016. Oi intends to renegotiate the terms of the contracts that will expire during the year 2016. As no covenant violation occurred up to the date that these financial statements were issued the debts are classified as current or non-current based on their original maturity.

In addition, most of the renegotiated terms in effect for 2016 require Oi to use the net proceeds from the sale of PT Portugal to reduce its debt or make acquisitions as part of the consolidation of the Brazilian telecommunications industry.

Under the Trust Deed governing each of the Bonds issued by PTIF (other than the PTIF 6.25% Notes due 2016), or the PTIF Bonds, we were required to file audited financial statements of PTIF as ofand conditions and for the year ended December 31, 20142019, the Company and its subsidiaries were compliant with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce no later than January 31, 2016. On April 29, 2016, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, the trustee under this Trust Deed, or the PTIF Trustee, delivered a written notice to PTIF and Oi noting that the failure of PTIF to provide the 2014 audited financial statements constituted a potential event of default under the PTIF Bonds and requesting the delivery of those financial statements. PTIF is continuing to work with its auditor to complete the preparation of its 2014 audited financial statements as soon as possible.

The PTIF Trustee has notified PTIF that if PTIF fails to deliver the financial statements on or prior to May 29, 2016 and the PTIF Trustee determines that this failure is materially prejudicial to the interestsall relevant covenants of the holders of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee could declare that the PTIF Bonds are immediately dueagreements.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and repayable. Under the terms of the PTIF Bonds, the PTIF Trustee is not obliged to exercise its discretion to declare any PTIF Bonds immediately due and repayable or to take any other action to enforce the rights of the holders of the PTIF Bonds unless it shall have been indemnified to its satisfaction and specifically directed or requested to do so by a requisite percentage of the holders of the PTIF Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PTIF Bonds.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

As of December 31, 2015Failure to comply with these financial ratios might result in the total indebtedness was classified between short-term and long-term liabilities under the consolidated balance sheet based on theaccelerated maturity of the debt instrument or contract.

The termsbalance due. As a result of the instruments governingCOVID-19 pandemic and the high foreign exchange volatility, the Company initiated talks with its creditors and has successfully obtained a substantial portionwaiver on March 30, 2020, eliminating, therefore, any concern of our indebtedness contain cross-acceleration clausespossibly triggering consequences of a failure to comply with certain covenants in the first quarter of 2020.

Changes in borrowings and if any seriesfinancing

   2018  Interest,
monetary
corrections, and
exchange
differences
  Amortization
of debt
discount
   Principal
and
interest
payment
  Tax and
other
payments
  Transfers
and other
  2019 

Borrowings and financing

   30,390,692   2,253,793     (935,243  (171,962  104,575   31,641,855 

Debt discount

   (13,928,660  (334,269  910,491      (48,757  (13,401,195

Incurred debt issuance cost

   (12,126       (1,785  (13,911
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   16,449,906   1,919,524   910,491    (935,243)   (171,962)   54,033   18,226,749 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company made the interest payments of the PTIFQualified Bonds, were accelerated, this acceleration would enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness. Were a substantial amount of our outstanding indebtedness to be accelerated, we maywhich do not have sufficient funds to repay such debt when due.

Upon the closing of the financial statementsa grace period for the year ended December 31, 2015 there was no covenants violation that would allow the acceleration of the maturity of other debts.

Committed and unused credit facilities

In December 2014 the Company signed a financing agreement with Banco do Nordeste do Brasil (BNB)interest, in the amount of R$370.6 million to finance part of the investments in the Northeast of Brazil. There was no disbursement from this facility to date.August 2019.

 

17.21.DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

   2015   2014 

Assets

    

Currency swaps

   6,805,084     2,871,904  

Interest rate swaps

   445,740     196,017  

Non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

   102,329     153,560  

Options

   33,550    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   7,386,703     3,221,481  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   606,387     340,558  

Non-current

   6,780,316     2,880,923  

Liabilities

    

Currency swaps

   1,197,157     413,573  

Interest rate swaps

   594,433     241,138  

Non-deliverable forwards (NDFs)

   686,488     12,211  

Options

   32,265    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,510,343     666,922  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   1,988,948     523,951  

Non-current

   521,395     142,971  

18.LICENSES AND CONCESSIONS PAYABLE

   2019   2018 

Personal Mobile Services (SMP)

   58,582    29,530 

STFC concessions

     56,089 

Total

   58,582    85,619 

Current

   58,582    85,619 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2015   2014 

SMP

   905,601     1,238,209  

STFC concessions

   12,936     123,731  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   918,537     1,361,940  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   911,930     675,965  

Non-current

   6,607     685,975  

Licenses and concessions payable correspondsCorrespond to the amounts payable to ANATEL for the radiofrequency concessions and the licenses to provide the SMP services, obtained at public auctions, and STFC service concessions, obtained at public auctions.concessions.

The payment schedule is as follows:

2016

   911,930  

2017

   3,147  

2018

   3,147  

2019

   313  
  

 

 

 

Total

   918,537  
  

 

 

 

 

19.22.

LEASES PAYABLE

2019

Towers

7,373,373

Physical space

403,485

Stores

103,792

Real estate

72,719

Vehicles

196,657

Total

8,150,026

Current

1,510,097

Non-current

6,639,929

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Movements in leases payable

Balance at January 1, 2018

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

8,167,932

New contracts

237,575

Cancellations

(127,699

Interest

958,573

Payments

(1,611,273

Contractual changes

524,918

Balance at December 31, 2019

8,150,026

Maturity of long-term lease payments

2021

   1,501,799 

2022

   1,414,630 

2023

   1,307,923 

2024

   1,253,069 

2025 to 2029

   4,882,027 

2030 and thereafter

   3,613,174 

Total

   13,972,622 

Interest

   (7,332,693

Non-current

   6,639,929 

The present value of leases payable was calculated, based on a projection of future fixed payments, which do not take into consideration the projected monetary correction, discounted using discount rates that range from 10.79% to 12.75% p.a.

Contracts not recognized as leases payable

The Company elected not to recognize a leased not to recognize a lease liability for short-term leases (leases with expected period of 12 months or less) or leases of low value assets. As at December 31, 2019, the payments made under such leases were recognized in profit or loss and amounted to R$78,134. Additionally, the Company also recognized in profit or loss the amount R$7,966, related to variable lease payments.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

23.

TAX FINANCINGREFINANCING PROGRAM

The outstanding balance of the Tax Debt Refinancing Program is broken down as follows:

 

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Law 11941/09 and Law 12865/2013 tax financing program

   791,696     983,904     417,076    496,240 

REFIS II - PAES

   3,392     6,326  
  

 

   

 

 

PRT (MP 766/2017) (i)

     54,528 

PERT (Law 13496/2017) (ii)

   427    2,438 

Total

   795,088     990,230     417,503    553,206 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   78,432     94,041     86,721    142,036 

Non-current

   716,656     896,189     330,782    411,170 

The amounts of the tax refinancing program created under Law 11941/2009, Provisional Act (MP) 766/2017, and Law 13469/2017, divided into principal, fine and interest, which include the debt declared at the time the deadline to join the program (Law 11941/2009 installment plan) was reopened as provided for by Law 12865/2013 and Law 12996/2014, are broken down as follows:

 

   2015   2014 
   Principal   Fines   Interest   Total   Total 

Tax on revenue (COFINS)

   176,567     6,762     203,899     387,228     563,846  

Income tax

   42,576     4,201     54,120     100,897     119,447  

Tax on revenue (PIS)

   64,756     1,266     38,116     104,138     102,598  

Social security (INSS – SAT)

   527     2,675     6,679     9,881     13,852  

Social contribution

   10,414     1,362     13,875     25,651     30,985  

Tax on banking transactions (CPMF)

   19,196     2,156     26,959     48,311     39,717  

Other

   44,916     5,238     68,828     118,982     119,785  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   358,952     23,660     412,476     795,088     990,230  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2019   2018 
   Principal   Fines   Interest   Total   Total 

Tax on revenue (COFINS)

   2,718      151,072    153,790    199,595 

Income tax

   1,317      36,678    37,995    44,967 

Tax on revenue (PIS)

   36,785      35,242    72,027    79,885 

Social security (INSS – SAT)

   650    371    2,018    3,039    4,774 

Social contribution

   580    22    10,713    11,315    12,503 

Tax on banking transactions (CPMF)

   18,950    2,137    29,486    50,573    50,132 

PRT – Other debts—RFB

           54,528 

PERT – Other debts—RFB

   240      187    427    2,438 

Other

   12,137    4,314    71,886    88,337    104,384 

Total

   73,377    6,844    337,282    417,503    553,206 

The payment schedule is as follows:

 

2016

   78,432  

2017

   90,010  

2018

   90,010  

2019

   90,010  

2020

   90,010  

2021 to 2023

   270,030  

2024 to 2025

   86,586  
  

 

 

 

Total

   795,088  
  

 

 

 

2020

   86,718 

2021

   86,292 

2022

   86,292 

2023

   86,292 

2024

   71,909 

Total

   417,503 

The tax refinancing plans under Law 11941/2009 and Law 12865/2013 are divided into 180 monthly installments. Companies are required to ensuredebts, as is the timely paymentcase of all the installments and will be excluded from the program if they have three installments outstanding, whether consecutive or otherwise, or fail to pay one installment, if all the others have been paid.

The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ debts included in said tax refinancing programs, are divided into several types of debts, determined bynot subject to the nature (social security or otherwise) and agency responsible for the managementterms of the related debt (either the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service, or RFB, or the National Treasury Attorney General’s Office, or PGFN).judicial reorganization terms.

To date, the Company is aware of the consolidation of some of these types of tax refinancing programs, while other are still being consolidated by the RFB or the PGFN and are, therefore, subject to confirmation of the amounts payable in installments and outstanding balances.

Regarding the installment plans already verified by the tax authorities, the Company was notified of the acceptance of revision request filed by one of the Company’s subsidiaries to exclude debts previously settled, resulting in a significant reduction of the outstanding balances related to one of the types of tax refinancing programs. Thus, the Company made some accounting adjustments to adjust the corresponding balances of the line items where such obligations were recognized to the amount verified by the RFB at the end of the consolidation revision procedure, resulting in the reversal of liabilities previously amounting to R$168,541.

The Company and some of its subsidiaries’ joined the new tax installment program governed by Article 2 of Law 12996/2014, under which they can include federal tax debts past due through December 31, 2013. In its application to the new program, the Company elected to pay its debt in 30 monthly installments.

In November 2014 the balances of the tax installment plans entered into by the Company and its subsidiaries under Article 2 of Law 12996/2014 were fully settled as provided for by Article 33 of Law 13043/2014, i.e., the companies offset their own tax loss carryforwards against 70% of their tax debts R$256,118 in Company and R$302,014 on a consolidated basis, and settled the remaining 30% of R$109,765 in Company and R$129,435 on a consolidated basis in cash. The Company and its subsidiaries complied with all the requirements set out in said Law and the administrative order that regulated its enforcement and the related deadlines, including the payment of amounts that had to be paid in cash, while the utilization of tax loss carryforwards is still subject to analysis and confirmation by the Federal Revenue Service.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(i)

Tax Compliance Program (PRT)

The Company elected to include and settle under said tax refinancing program, created by the Federal Government, under Provisional Act 766/2017 (PRT), the administrative proceedings with a probable likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and those where, while attributed a possible likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, the cost effectiveness of including them provided to be highly advantageous in light of the benefits offered by the program.

The Company elected the payment method that allows settling 76% of the consolidated debt utilizing tax credits arising on tax loss carryforwards amounting to R$1,035 million, and paid the remaining 24% in 24 monthly installments totaling R$327 million plus SELIC interest charged as from the adherence month. All the procedures necessary for the Company to join the PRT were completed within the statutory deadline, while MP 766/2017 was still in effect.

Subsequently, on June 1, 2017 the effective period of said Provisional Act ended because it was not passed into law within the relevant constitutional deadline. However, as established by the Federal Constitution, the legal relationships established and arising from actions taken while a provisional act not passed into law was effective, as in the case of the Company’s joining the PRT, continue to be governed by the former provisional act, except where the National Congress provides for otherwise, by means of a legislative decree.

Note that the PRT, governed by MP 766/2017, is not equivalent to the tax installment plan established by MP 783/2017 (PERT), of May 31, 2017, because of differences in payment terms and conditions, plan scope, and access requirements.

 

20.(ii)CONTINGENCIES

Special Tax Compliance Program (PERT)

Broken down as follows:The Company elected to include in and settle through PERT only tax debts that in aggregate do not exceed the fifteen million Brazilian reais (R$15,000,000.00) ceiling set by Article 3 of Law 13496/2017.

The tax debts included in said program were those being disputed at the administrative level in proceedings classified with a low likelihood of the Company winning and which, in the event of an unfavorable outcome, would result in a lawsuit—and entail all the associated costs—, the reason why the cost effectiveness of joining the program was quite positive, because of the benefits offered by PERT (especially the payment of just 5% of the debt in cash).

 

   

Type

  2015   2014 
  

Labor

    
(i)  

Overtime

   329,510     471,506  
(ii)  

Sundry premiums

   110,664     131,963  
(iii)  

Indemnities

   99,607     152,113  
(iv)  

Stability/reintegration

   97,783     126,070  
(v)  

Additional post-retirement benefits

   70,942     83,417  
(vi)  

Salary differences and related effects

   38,013     52,852  
(vii)  

Lawyer/expert fees

   25,291     29,382  
(viii)  

Severance pay

   15,016     20,235  
(ix)  

Labor fines

   10,275     15,562  
(x)  

Employment relationship

   6,967     5,717  
(xi)  

Severance Pay Fund (FGTS)

   6,694     9,359  
(xii)  

Joint liability

   610     1,581  
(xiii)  

Other claims

   38,105     55,267  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total

   849,477     1,155,024  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Tax

    
(i)  

State VAT (ICMS)

   308,144     363,025  
(ii)  

Tax on services (ISS)

   71,201     71,666  
(iii)  

INSS (joint liability, fees, and severance pay)

   29,394     31,735  
(iv)  

Tax on net income (ILL)

   6,882     20,691  
(v)  

Other claims

   76,736     45,504  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total

   492,357     532,621  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Civil

    
(i)  

Corporate

   1,111,742     1,549,525  
(ii)  

ANATEL

   1,148,621     1,104,163  
(iii)  

Small claims courts

   361,474     282,209  
(iv)  

Other claims

   471,295     508,226  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total

   3,093,132     3,444,123  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total provisions

   4,434,966     5,131,768  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Current

   1,020,994     1,058,521  
  

Non-current

   3,413,972     4,073,247  

In compliance with the relevant Law, the provisions are adjusted for inflation on a monthly basis.

Breakdown of contingent liabilities, by nature

The breakdown of contingent liabilities with a possible unfavorable outcome and, therefore, not recognized in accounting, is as follows:

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

24. PROVISIONS

Balance breakdown

 

   2015   2014 

Labor

   779,776     1,082,677  

Tax

   24,047,529     21,059,009  

Civil

   1,238,279     1,146,745  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   26,065,584     23,288,431  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   

Type

  2019   2018 
  Labor    
(i)  

Overtime

   855,722    602,673 
(ii)  

Indemnities

   299,096    187,499 
(iii)  

Sundry premiums

   221,743    166,963 
(iv)  

Stability/reintegration

   215,449    160,442 
(v)  

Additional post-retirement benefits

   108,827    94,691 
(vi)  

Salary differences and related effects

   101,573    61,674 
(vii)  

Lawyer/expert fees

   51,193    30,898 
(viii)  

Severance pay

   38,261    31,521 
(ix)  

Labor fines

   30,399    25,921 
(x)  

Employment relationship

   18,758    15,952 
(xi)  

Severance Pay Fund (FGTS)

   13,306    10,804 
(xii)  

Joint liability

   3,100    889 
(xiii)  

Other claims

   93,605    67,254 
  Total   2,051,032    1,457,181 
  Tax    
(i)  

State VAT (ICMS)

   746,481    503,332 
(ii)  

Tax on services (ISS)

   69,208    76,389 
(iii)  

INSS (joint liability, fees, and severance pay)

   23,847    23,100 
(iv)  Real Estate Tax (IPTU)   150,223   
(v)  

Other claims

   61,189    47,262 
  Total   1,050,948    650,083 
  Civil    
(i)  

ANATEL

   570,283    580,182 
(ii)  

Corporate

   397,946    1,124,037 
(iii)  

Small claims courts

   118,910    191,839 
(iv)  

Other claims(1)

   1,062,561    1,035,398 
  Total   2,149,700    2,931,456 
  Total provisions   5,251,680    5,038,720 
  Current   547,996    680,542 
  Non-current   4,703,684    4,358,178 

(1)

In 2018, includes R$157,809 related to the agreement entered into with Pharol, as described in Note 1 – Litigation Termination Settlement between the Company and Pharol, settled in the first quarter of 2019.

In compliance with the Law applicable for Labor, Tax and Civil proceedings, the lawsuit are adjusted for monetary correction on a monthly basis, considering the monetary correction indexes applicable in court instances, composed mainly by IGPM, TR and SELIC rates.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Summary of movements in provision balances

 

   Labor   Tax   Civil   Total 

Balance at Jan 1, 2014

   1,142,274     640,372     3,833,671     5,616,317  

Acquisition of investments - PT Portugal

   7,471     86,198     48,040     141,709  

Inflation adjustment

   147,825     (29,680   115,131     233,276  

Additions/(reversals)

   116,230     13,895     340,472     470,597  

Write-offs for payment/terminations

   (250,830   (82,593   (848,190   (1,181,613

Foreign exchange differences

   5     69     36     110  

Liabilities on held-for-sale assets

   (7,951   (95,640   (45,037   (148,628

Balance in 2014

   1,155,024     532,621     3,444,123     5,131,768  

Merger of TmarPart and subsidiaries

   6,987     6,130     785     13,902  

Inflation adjustment

   (15,016   33,053     158,260     176,297  

Additions/(reversals)

   (113,636   44,325     635,928     566,617  

Write-offs for payment/terminations

   (183,882   (123,772   (1,145,964   (1,453,618

Balance in 2015

   849,477     492,357     3,093,132     4,434,966  
   Labor  Tax  Civil  Total 

Balance at January 1, 2018

   1,596,418   660,302   5,526,414   7,783,134 

Monetary correction (i)

   184,112   77,697   (34,939  226,870 

Additions/(reversals) (i)

   99,805   (49,659  42,734   92,880 

Write-offs for payment/terminations (i)

   (423,154  (38,257  (2,602,753  (3,064,164

Balance at December 31, 2018

   1,457,181   650,083   2,931,456   5,038,720 

Monetary correction (ii)

   485,049   60,688   1,074,641   1,620,378 

Additions/(reversals) (ii)

   316,182   1,002,827   (1,102,571  216,438 

Write-offs for payment/terminations

   (207,380  (666,563  (753,826  (1,627,769

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

    3,913    3,913 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,051,032   1,050,948   2,149,700   5,251,680 

Pursuant to our legal counsel’s assessments and based on more complete historic information, we revised the likelihood of unfavorable outcome of a set of labor lawsuits to which the Company is jointly and severally liable to remote, resulting in a decrease in the previously recognized amount.

We revised the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in civil lawsuits—corporate lawsuits involving the financial participation agreements, including statistical techniques, as a result of the higher experience accumulated in the matter. The change in estimates generated a R$325,709 reversal in the provisions for civil contingencies—corporate, recognized in other operating income (expenses), net.
(i)

This line item basically includes the amounts related to proceedings terminated and included in the list of the Company’s judicial reorganization creditors, which were transferred to the line item trade payables and will be paid according to the terms of the JRP.

(ii)

The Company continuously monitors its proceedings and revised the calculation methodology of provision estimates, taking into consideration the new profile and history of legal proceeding terminations, in the context of the JRP, as well as in the assessment of the risk of loss carried out by Management supported by its legal advisors.

Summary of the main matters related to the recognized provisions and contingent liabilities

ContingenciesProvisions

Labor

The Company is a party to a large number of labor lawsuits and calculates the related provision based on a statistical methodology that takes into consideration, but not limited to, the total number of existing lawsuits, the claims make in each lawsuit, the amount claimed in each lawsuit, the history of payments made, and the technical opinion of the legal counsel.

 

(i)Overtime -

Overtime—refers to the claim for payment of salary and premiums forby alleged overtime hours;

 

(ii)

Indemnities—refers to amounts allegedly due for occupational accidents, leased vehicles, occupational diseases, pain and suffering, and tenure;

(iii)

Sundry premiums - premiums—refer to claims of hazardous duty premium, based on Law 7369/85, regulated by Decree 93412/86,Article 193 of the Brazilian Labor Code (CLT), due to the alleged risk from employees’ contact with the electric power grid, health hazard premium, pager pay, and transfer premium;premium.

 

(iii)Indemnities - refers to amounts allegedly due for occupational accidents, leased vehicles, occupational diseases, pain and suffering, and tenure;

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(iv)

Stability/reintegration - reintegration—claim due to alleged noncompliance with an employee’s special condition which prohibited termination of the employment contract without cause;

 

(v)

Supplementary retirement benefits - benefits—differences allegedly due on the benefit salary referring to payroll amounts;

 

(vi)

Salary differences and related effects - effects—refer mainly to claims for salary increases due to alleged noncompliance with trade union agreements. As for the effects, these refer to the impact of the salary increase allegedly due on the other amounts calculated based on the employee’s salary;

 

(vii)

Lawyers/expert fees - fees—installments payable to the plaintiffs’ lawyers and court appointed experts, when necessary for the case investigation, to obtain expert evidence;

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(viii)

Severance pay - pay—claims of amounts which were allegedly unpaid or underpaid upon severance;

 

(ix)

Labor fines - fines—amounts arising from delays or nonpayment of certain amounts provided for byin the employment contract, within the deadlines set out in prevailing legislation and collective bargaining agreements;

 

(x)

Employment relationship - relationship—lawsuits filed by outsourced companies’ former employees claiming the recognition of an employment relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries by alleging an illegal outsourcing and/or the existence of elements that evidence such relationship, such as direct subordination;

 

(xi)

Supplement to FGTS fine - fine—arising from understated inflation, refers to claims to increase the FGTS severance fine as a result of the adjustment of accounts of this fund due to inflation effects.

The Company filed a lawsuit against Caixa Econômica Federal to assure the reimbursement of all amounts paid for this purpose;

 

(xii)

Joint liability - liability—refers to the claim to assign liability to the Company, filed by outsourced personnel, due to alleged noncompliance with the latter’s labor rights by their direct employers;

 

(xiii)

Other claims - claims—refer to different litigation including rehiring, profit sharing, qualification of certain allowances as compensation, etc.

Tax

The provisions for tax lawsuits are calculated individually taking into consideration Management and the legal counsel’s risk assessment. These contingencies are not included in the Judicial Reorganization Plan.

 

(i)

ICMS - ICMS—Refers to the provision considered sufficient by management to cover the various tax assessments related to: (a) levy of ICMS and not ISS on certain revenue; (b) claim and offset of credits on the purchase of goods and other inputs, including those necessary for

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

network maintenance; and (c) tax assessments related to alleged noncompliance with accessory obligations.

 

(ii)ISS -

ISS—the Company and TMAR have provisions for tax assessment notices challenged because of the levy of ISS on several value added, technical, and administrative services, and equipment leases.

 

(iii)INSS -

INSS—Provision related basically to probable losses on lawsuits discussing joint liability and indemnities.

 

(iv)ILL - TMAR offset

IPTU – Provision related to entries that refer to the ILL paid up to calendar 1992 based on Federal Supreme Court (“STF”) decisions that declarecollection of IPTU (municipal property tax) levied by several different municipalities where the unconstitutionality of this tax. However, even though there is case law on the matter, a provision is maintained, as there is no final decision of the criteria for the adjustments of these credits.Company owns properties.

 

(v)

Other claims - claims—Refer basically to provisions to cover Real Estate Tax (IPTU) assessments and several tax assessments related to the collection of income tax and social contribution collection.

Civil

 

(i)

ANATEL – On June 30, 2016 the Company was a party to noncompliance administrative proceedings and lawsuits filed by ANATEL and the Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU) totaling an estimate R$14.5 billion, which were included in the JRP as electable for payment as provided for in this Plan. On this date, R$8.4 billion in liquid proceedings and R$6.1 billion in illiquid proceedings.

With regard to the proceedings included in the JRP and taking into consideration the decision that granted the judicial reorganization on February 5, 2018, the Company revised the criteria used to calculate the provision for these regulatory contingencies to start considering the estimate of discounted future cash flows associated to each one of the payment methods provided for in the JRP for this type of claims. As at December 31, 2019, this provision totals R$570 million.

For the contingencies not subject to the judicial reorganization, the takes into consideration the individual management of each noncompliance event, based on opinions of outside attorneys.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company disagrees and is challenging some of the alleged noncompliance events, and is also challenging the unfairness and unreasonableness of the amount of imposed fines in light of the pinpointed noncompliance event and has kept in balance sheet the amount it deems a probable loss.

The JRP prescribes in a specific clause how regulatory agencies’ claims should be addressed. It is worth mentioning that part of the amount recognized in December 2017, related to ANATEL was transferred to Trade Payables (see Note 18) as part of the recognitions resulting from the JRP. Note also that ANATEL filed bill of reviewNo. 001068-32.2018.8.19.0000 against the decision that ratifies the JRP alleging that Clause 4.3.4, which prescribes the payment method of this agency’s claims, is null and void. This bill of review was denied by the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice, which have been sent to the 3rd Vice President of the Court to decide on whether the Special and Extraordinary Appeals filed by ANATEL against the said decision are admissible. In addition the 7th Corporate Court of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice issued a decision establishing that withdrawal of the judicial deposit made by Telemar to settle the first twelve (12) installments to repay ANATEL’s claim, as provided for in the JRP and, on June 28, 2019, Oi filed a new request, under the same standards of the precisions requests, to repay the 13th and 18th installments of the ANATEL’s claim.

(ii)

Corporate – Financial Participation Agreements -Agreements: these agreements were governed by Administrative Rules 415/1972, 1181/1974, 1361/1976, 881/1990, 86/1991, and 1028/1996. Subscribers heldWhen they entered into a financial participation agreement to acquire a telephone line, subscribers became holders of a financial interest in the concessionaire after paying in a certain amount, initially recorded as capitalizable funds and subsequently recorded in the concessionaire’s equity, after a capital increase was approved by the shareholders’ meeting, thus generating the issuance of shares. The lawsuits filed against the former CRT - CRT—Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações, a company acquiredmerged by the Company, and other local carriers members of the Telebrás system, challenge the way shares were granted to subscribers based on said financial participation agreements.

The Company used to recognize a provision for the risk of unfavorable outcome in these lawsuits based on certain legal doctrine. DuringIn 2009 however, decisionsthe Superior Court of Justice issued by appellate courtsan Abstract—ruling that summarizes the majority understanding of a court on given matter—that led the Company to revisitrevise its assessment of the amount accrued and the level of risk classification ofattributed to the relevant lawsuits.lawsuits that discuss the matter. The Company, considering obviously the peculiarities of each decision and based on the assessment made by its legal department and outside legal counsel, changed its estimate on the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome from possible to probable. In 2009, the Company’s management, based on the opinions of its legal department and outside legal counsel, revised the measurement criteria of the provision for contingencies related to the financial interest agreements. Said revision contemplated additional considerations regarding the dates and the arguments of the final and unappealable decisions on ongoing lawsuits, as well as the use of statistical criteria to estimate the amount of the provision for those lawsuits. TheBased on a methodology prepared with the support of itsin-house and outside consultants, currently the Company currently accrues these amounts mainlyprovides for the lawsuits discussing this matter taking into consideration (i)primarily, for purposes of calculating the criteria above, (ii)amounts involved in the lawsuits within or the lawsuits out of the statute of limitations period, the following variables: (i) the number of ongoing lawsuits by matter discussed, and (iii)without payment; (ii) the average amount of historical losses, broken down by matter in dispute. In addition tohistoric losses; (iii) the average number of court settlements; and (iv) the effects of paying these criteria, in 2013contingencies under the courts recognized, in several decisions, the enforcement of the twenty-year statute of limitationsjudicial reorganization ratified on January 8, 2018. Specifically for the lawsuits that met this criterion andfor which settlements were reached in the Company, based onmediation of illiquid amounts, the opinion of its in-house and outside legal

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

counsel, understands that the likelihood of lossamount is remote. Therefore, it is not necessary to set up a provision.considered settled.

At the end of 2010, the website of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) disclosed news that this court had set compensation criteria to be adoptedfollowed by the Company to the benefit of the shareholders of the former CRT for those cases new shares, possibly due, could not be issued because of the sentence issued. According to this court judgment news, which does not correspond to a final decision, theThe criteria must be based on (i) the definition of the number of shares that each claimant would be entitled, measuring the capital invested at the book value of the share reported in the company’sCRT’s monthly trial balance on the date it waspaid-in, (ii) after said number of shares is determined, it must be multiplied by its quotation on the stock exchange at the closing of the trading day the final and unappealable decision is issued, when the claimant becomes entitled to sell or disposed of the shares, and (iii) the result obtain must be adjusted for inflationmonetary correction (IPC/INPC) from the trading day of the date of the final and unappealable decision, plus legal interest since notification. In the case of succession, the benchmark amount will be the stock market price of the successor company.

Based on current information, management believes that itsthe new profile and history of the termination of the judicial processes, in the context of the JRP, and, using the loss risk assessment, Management adjusted the estimate would not be materially impacted as at December 31, 2015, had these criteria already been adopted. Thereof the provisioning made in 2019. In addition, there may be however, significant changes in the items above, mainly regarding the market price of Company shares.

(ii)ANATEL - refers basically to alleged noncompliance with General Universal Service Targets Plan (“PGMU”), General Quality Targets Plan (“PGMQ”), and the Quality Indicators Regulation (“RIQ”) obligations;

In December 2013, ANATEL approved Resolution 629/2013, which approves the Regulation for the executionOi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and monitoring of the Policy Adjustment Agreements (TAC). The TAC that allow telecommunications operators to request, in the context of proceedings for which no final and unappealable decision has been issued at the administrative level by ANATEL, that such fines be settled through investments in infrastructure, with additional incentives for projects in underdeveloped areas or through direct benefits to consumers, as well as the revision of the policies that resulted in said fines. In April 2015, Oi filed a proposal containing (a) corrective actions for approximately 500 policies that covers almost all the main reasons for the regulatory penalties imposed by ANATEL and (b) an “additional commitment” to offset Oi’s contingencies falling within the scope of the TAC.

Since then, ANATEL is assessing and discussing the content of this proposal with Oi, in compliance with the formalities provided for under the TAC, to meet the premises that drove the approval of this Regulation. Currently, the TAC negotiation process is at its final stage and we expect to sign the agreements on Universal Service and Quality targets in the coming months. Up to December 31, 2015, the proceedings being judged by ANATEL and discussed in the context of the TAC totaled approximately R$5 billion, consisting of fines at several procedural stages—approximately R$3 billion in fines imposed and R$2 billion in estimated fines.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

If Oi fails to comply with its commitments set forth in the TAC or discharge the obligations established by ANATEL regulations, it will be subject to penalties, such as: warnings, fines, and, in a worst case scenario, ANATEL’s intervention, temporary suspensions of services, or cancellation of its concessions and licenses. If the TAC does not provide for a specific policy, the related administrative proceeding returns to the ordinary review proceeding, where Oi will discuss with ANATEL its nature and amounts involved, as well as the implementation of corrective measures, if necessary.

In 2015, ANATEL revised the penalization methodologies concerning the main types of infractions, notably User Rights and Guarantees, Quality (targets and indicators), and Station Licensing, and initiated a Public Hearing process for the revision of the Universal Service and Barriers to Inspections methodologies. Oi and the other industry players contributed to the Public Consultations conducted by ANATEL on these matters by emphasizing the need for improvement that can contribute to penalty fairness that ensures the educational nature of penalties and the economic feasibility of the operators, thus reducing disputes in courts and favoring the expansion of industry investments. As at December 31, 2015, the Company had fines outside the jurisdiction of ANATEL that were determined under the former penalty calculation methodology and are being discussed in courts. The Company disagrees and is challenging some of the alleged noncompliance events, and is also challenging the unfairness of the amount of some imposed fines in light of the pinpointed noncompliance event.

 

(iii)

Small claims courts - courts—claims filed by customers for whichwhom the individual indemnification compensation amounts do not exceed the equivalent of forty (40) minimum wages; and

The Company is a party to a large number of lawsuits filed in small claims courts and calculates the related provision based on a statistical methodology that takes into consideration, but not limited to, the total number of existing lawsuits, the claims make in each lawsuit, the amount claimed in each lawsuit, the history of payments made, and the technical opinion of the legal counsel and the impacts of the Judicial Reorganization Plan ratified on January 8, 2018.

 

(iv)

Other claims - claims—refer to several of ongoing lawsuits relating todiscussing contract terminations, certain agencies requesting the reopening of customer service centers, compensation claimed by former suppliers and building contractors, in lawsuits filed by equipment vendors against Company subsidiaries, revision of contractual terms and conditions due to changes introduced by a plan to stabilize the economy, and litigation mainly involving discussions on the breach of contracts, to which management and its legal counsel attribute a probable likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, etc.contracts.

PossibleThe provisions for these contingencies are calculated individually taking into consideration Management and the legal counsel’s risk assessment.

Breakdown of contingent liabilities, per nature

The breakdown of contingent liabilities with a possible unfavorable outcome and, therefore, not recognized in accounting, is as follows:

   2019   2018 

Labor

   797,927    770,982 

Tax

   28,416,097    27,586,094 

Civil

   1,667,900    1,723,110 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   30,881,924    30,080,186 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contingent liabilities

The Company and its subsidiaries are also parties to several lawsuits in which the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is classified as possible, in the opinion of their legal counsel, and for which no provision for contingent liabilities has been recognized.

The main contingencies classified with possible likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, according to the Company´s management’s opinion, based on its legal counsel’s assessment, are summarized below:

Labor

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Refer to several lawsuits claiming, but not limited to, the payment of salary differences, overtime, hazardous duty and health hazard premium, and joint liability, which total approximately R$779,776797,927 (R$1,082,677770,982 in 2014)2018).

Tax

The main ongoing lawsuits have the following matters:

 

(i)ICMS - several ICMS assessment notifications, including two main matters: ICMS levied

ICMS—it refers to discussions concerning the levy of this tax on certain revenue fromactivities and/or the provision of certain services, already subjectsuch as, for example, the levy of ICMS on noncore activities, supplemental services, services provided to ISStax-exempt customers, subscriptions minimum contract period, or which areeven the disallowance of tax credits because some States qualify them as undue, including, but not partlimited to, tax credits of capital assets, different calculation of the ICMS tax base, and utilization of ICMS credits claimed on the purchase of goods and other inputs,credit ratio (CIAP), totaling approximately R$13,470,008 (R$12,523,402 in the approximate amount of R$10,144,485 (R$7,554,421 in 2014)2018);

 

(ii)

ISS - alleged levy of this tax on subsidiary telecommunications services and discussion regarding the classification of the services taxed by the cities listed in Supplementary Law 116/2003, amounting approximately to R$2,908,0313,286,248 (R$2,588,8493,505,366 in 2014)2018);

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(iii)

INSS - tax assessments to add amounts to the contribution salary allegedly due by the Company, amounting approximately to R$1,029,470 (995,994649,803 (R$695,249 in 2014)2018); and

 

(iv)

Federal taxes - taxes—several tax assessment notifications regarding basically the disallowances made on the calculation of taxes, errors in the completion of tax returns, transfer of PIS and COFINS and FUST related to changes in the interpretation of these taxes tax bases by ANATEL. These lawsuits amount approximately to R$9,965,54311,010,038 (R$9,919,74510,862,077 in 2014)2018).

Civil

The main ongoing lawsuits do not have any court decision which has been issued, and are primarilymainly related, but not limited to, challenging of network expansion plans, compensation for pain and suffering and material damages, collection lawsuits, and bidding processes. These lawsuits total approximately R$1,238,2791,667,900 (R$1,146,7451,723,110 in 2014)2018).

Fenapas – Federação Nacional das Associações de Aposentados, Pensionistas e Participantes em Fundo de Pensão do Setor de Telecomunicações - civil actions filed with the 5th Corporate Court of Rio de Janeiro, against, in addition to SISTEL, the Company and other operators, aiming at the annulment of thespin-off of the PBS pension plan, alleging, in brief “the breakdown of the Fundação Sistel supplementary pension fund scheme”, which resulted in several specific PBS mirror plans, and the corresponding allocations of funds from the technical surplus and the tax contingency existing at the time of thespin-off. The amount involved cannot be estimated and it is not possible to settle the claims because they are unenforceable since this would require handing back the spun off net assets of SISTEL related to telecommunications operators belonging to the former Telebrás system.

Guarantees

The Company has bank guarantee letters and guarantee insurance granted by several financial institutions and insurers to guarantee commitments arising from lawsuits, contractual obligations, and biddings with ANATEL. The total adjusted amount of contracted guaranteesbonds and guarantee insurance,insurances, effective at December 31, 2015,2019 corresponds to R$5,394,59711,909,901 (R$5,816,07113,750,739 in 2014), Company, and R$15,577,522 (R$16,488,245 in 2014), on a consolidated basis.2018). The commission charges on these contracts are based on market rates.

 

21.25.

OTHER PAYABLES

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

  2015   2014   2019   2018 

Unearned revenues (i)

   2,039,183     2,475,391  

Onerous obligation (i)

   5,817,130    4,493,894 

Unearned revenues (ii)

   1,704,420    1,916,570 

Provisions for indemnities payable

   640,661    676,984 

Advances from customers

   767,905     635,681     313,163    215,228 

Provisions for indemnities payable (Note 26)

   668,534    

Payable for the acquisition of equity interest

   382,230     408,978  

Consignation to third parties

   43,160     43,062  

Consignment to third parties

   41,249    56,302 

Provision for asset decommissioning

   15,437     14,835     18,101    17,395 

Other

   356,088     46,328     404,455    510,867 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,272,537     3,624,275     8,939,179    7,887,240 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   1,219,624     1,021,719     1,405,013    1,381,919 

Non-current

   3,052,913     2,602,556     7,534,166    6,505,321 

 

(i)Primarily refers (1)

The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to a telecommunications signals transmission capacity supply agreement using submarine cables that connect North America and South America, and also hires the supply of capacity of the space segment for the provision of the DTH TV service. Since (a) the agreement obligations exceed the economic benefits that are expected to be received throughout the agreement; and (b) the costs are unavoidable, the Company and its subsidiaries recognized, pursuant to IAS 37, an onerous obligation measured at the lowest of net output cost of the agreement brought to present value, in 2019, amounting to R$1.2 billion of the satellite transmission contract (DTH TV) and in 2018, amounting to R$4.5 billion of the transmission contract via submarine cables.

(ii)

Refers to the amounts received in advancea prepayment for the assignment of the right to the commercial operation and the use of infrastructure assets that are recognized in revenues overrevenue for the agreements’ effective periodperiod. Include also certification/installation rates of the underlying agreements and (2) prepaid mobile telephony servicesservice that are recognized in the revenue whenpursuant to the customers useperiod that the services.services are used by the customers.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

22.26.

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

(a)

Share capital

The Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization amounting to R$10,600,097 with the issue of 1,514,299 new book-entry, registered common shares without par value was approved at the Company’s Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on September 17, 2018. The fair value of the shares issued was R$11,613,980.

On October 28, 2018, the Company commenced the issuance and delivery of warrants and ADWs exercised by their holders and issued 115,914 common shares. The process was completed on January 4, 2019. The Subscription Warrants that had not been exercised by January 2, 2019 were cancelled.

On January 25, 2019, the Company completed the capital increase provided for by the JRP (Capital Increase—New Funds), with the issue of 3,225,806,451 new common shares, and the issue of 272,148,705 new common shares for private placement aimed at the Backstop Investors, and the issue of 275,985 new common shares related to the Subscription Warrants, all registered, book-entry, and without par value. The capital increase attributed to the capital and the capital reserves was R$500,466 and R$3,837,009, respectively (Note 1).

Subscribed andpaid-in capital is R$21,438,37432,538,937 (R$21,438,220 at December 31, 2014)32,038,471 in 2018), represented by the following no-par value shares:shares, without par value:

 

  Number of shares (in thousands)   Number of shares (in thousands) 
  2015   2014  2019   2018 

Total capital in shares

        

Common shares

   668,034     286,155     5,796,478    2,298,247 

Preferred shares

   157,727     572,317     157,727    157,727 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   825,761     858,472     5,954,205    2,455,974 
  

 

   

 

 

Treasury shares

        

Common shares

   148,282     8,425     30    32,030 

Preferred shares

   1,812     7,281     1,812    1,812 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   150,094     15,706     1,842    33,842 
  

 

   

 

 

Outstanding shares

        

Common shares

   519,752     277,730     5,796,448    2,266,217 

Preferred shares

   155,915     565,036     155,915    155,915 
  

 

   

 

 

Total outstanding shares

   675,667     842,766     5,952,363    2,422,132 
  

 

   

 

 

Preferred shares are nonvoting, but are assured priority inAs at December 31, 2019, the payment ofCompany reported a loss for the noncumulative minimum dividends equalyear amounting to R$9,000,434. Pursuant to the higher of 6% perCompany’s management proposal, subject to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting’s approval, loss for the year of the amount obtainedwas fully absorbed by dividing capital stock by the total number of shares of the Company or 3% per year of the amount obtained by dividing book equity by the total number of shares of the Company.reserves.

The Company is authorized to increase its capital, underthrough a Board of Directors’ resolution,decision, either in common andor preferred shares, up to theuntil its share capital top limit oftotals R$34,038,701,741.49,38,038,701,741.49, within the legal top limit of 2/3 forlegal cap of nonvoting shares in the issuancecase of issue of new nonvoting preferred shares.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

By resolutiondecision of the Shareholders’ Meeting or the Board of Directors’ Meeting,Directors, the Company’s share capital can be increased by capitalizing either retained earnings or prior reserves, previously set up forallocated to this purpose by the Shareholders’ Meeting. Under these conditions, theterms, a capitalization can be made without any change inchanging the number of shares.

CapitalIssued capital is represented by common and preferred shares, with nowithout par value. The Companyvalue, and in case of capital increases there is not requiredconstraint to maintainkeep the current proportionratio between these two types of common to preferred share on capital increases.shares.

On February 25, 2015 the Board of Directors approved a capital increase of R$154 without the issue of new shares, through the capitalization of the investment reserve.

In October 2015, the voluntary conversion of Company preferred shares into common shares was completed (Note 1).

(b)Treasury shares

Treasury shares as at December 31, 2015 originate from the corporate events that took place in the first quarter of 2015, the second quarter of 2014, and the first half of 2012, described below:

(i)On February 27, 2012, the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of Oi S.A. approved the Merger Protocol and Justification of Coari with and into the Company and, as a result, the cancelation of the all the treasury shares held by the Company on that date;

(ii)On February 27, 2012, the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of Oi S.A. approved the Merger Protocol and Justification of TNL with and into the Company, and the Company’s shares then held by TNL, as a result of the merger of Coari with and into the Company, were canceled, except for 24,647,867 common shares that remained in treasury;

(iii)Starting April 9, 2012, Oi paid the reimbursement of shares to withdrawing shareholders.

(iv)As a result of the Company’s capital increase approved by the Board of Directors on April 30 and May 5, 2014, and due to subscription made by Pharol in PT Portugal assets, R$263,028 was reclassified to treasury shares.

(v)Under the exchange agreement entered into with Pharol on September 8, 2014 (Note 27), approved at Pharol’s extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission - CVM, and at Oi’s extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, on March 30, 2015 the Company conducted a share exchange under which Pharol delivered to PTIF Oi shares divided into 474,348,720 OIBR3 shares and 948,697,440 OIBR4 shares (47,434,872 and 94,869,744 after the reverse stock split, respectively); in exchange, the Company delivered Rio Forte securities to PT SGPS, in the total principal amount of R$3,163 million (€897 million).

The treasury shares position corresponding to items (i), (ii) and (iii) referred to above, not taking into consideration item (iv) because this refers to a reclassification derived from cross-shareholdings, is as follows:

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Common
shares (*)
   Amount   Preferred shares
(*)
   Amount 

Balance in 2013

   84,251     880,378     72,808     1,224,146  

Reverse share split

   (75,826     (65,527  

Balance in 2014

   8,425     880,378     7,281     1,224,146  

Share exchange

   47,435     1,054,513     94,870     2,109,026  

Share conversion

   92,422     3,274,047     (100,339   (3,274,047

Balance in 2015

   148,282     5,208,938     1,812     59,125  

(*)Number of shares in thousands

Historical cost in purchase of treasury shares (R$ per share)

  2015   2014 

Weighted average

   13.40     13.40  

Minimum

   3.79     3.79  

Maximum

   15.25     15.25  

(c)Capital reserves

Capital reserves consist mainly of the Special Reserve on Merger that is represented by the corporate reorganizations primarily due to the corporate reorganization approved on February 27, 2012. In 2015, the increase in this reserve refers the net assets recorded related to merger of TmarPart approved on September 1, 2015 amounting to R$1,105,180 (Note 1).

(d)Dividends and interest on capital

Dividends are calculated pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws and the Brazilian Corporate Law and dividends preferred or priority dividends are calculated pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws.

Preferred shares are nonvoting, but are assured priority in the payment of the noncumulative minimum dividends equal to the higher of 6% per year of the amount obtained by dividing capital stock by the total number of shares of the Company or 3% per year of the amount obtained by dividing book equity by the total number of shares of the Company.

By decision of the Shareholders’ Meeting or the Board of Directors, preemptive rights over the Companyissue of shares, subscription warrants, or convertible debentures can pay or credit, as dividends, interest on capital pursuant tobe suspended in the cases provided for by Article 9, paragraph 7, of Law 9249/1995. The interest paid or credited will be offset against the annual mandatory minimum dividend amount, pursuant to Article 43172 of the Bylaws.Brazilian Corporate Law.

At the Company’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 29, 201526, 2019, it was approved the allocation of lossthe profit for 2014,the year 2018, amounting to R$4,407,711, was approved24,591,140 to offset prior years’ accumulated losses.

(b)

Treasury shares

On July 27, 2018, the Company delivered 116,251,405 common shares, previously held by PTIF, to the Qualified Bondholders, as follows: (i) offset againstpart of the legal reserverestructuring of the qualified bonds. The fair value related to the conversion of the Senior Notes settled with the delivery of treasury shares of R$773,072. The treasury shares delivered were written off as a contra entry to capital reserves, amounting to R$383,5272,727,842.

In February 2019, the Company bought back 1,800,000 preferred shares, in trades in the stock market, at a total cost of R$2,572 to ensure the compliance of the obligation assumed by the Company to transfer own shares held in treasury to shareholder Bratel, wholly-owned subsidiary da Pharol, in the context of the settlement entered into by both companies (Note 1).

In April 2019, due to confirmation of the settlement entered into by Oi and R$4,024,184Pharol, 32,000,000 common shares and 1,800,000 preferred shares were delivered to accumulated losses.Bratel, totaling 33,800,000 shares as provided for by the settlement entered into by the parties (Note 1).

(c)

Capital reserves

The capital reserves consist mainly of the reserves described below and according to the following practices:

Special merger goodwill reserve: represents the net amount of the balancing item to goodwill recorded in assets, as provided for by regulatory instruction.

Special merger reserve—net assets: represented by: (i) the net assets merged by the Company reported lossunder the Corporate Reorganization approved on February 27, 2012; and (ii) the net assets merged with and into the Company upon the merger of TmarPart approved on September 1, 2015, pursuant to the provisions of regulatory instruction.

Other capital reserves: represented mainly by: (i) R$1,933,200 arising from the capitalization of the earnings reserves in February 2015; (ii) R$3,837,009 related to the capital increase with new funds, as mentioned in this Note, item (a); and (iii) R$2,462,799 related to the absorption of capital reserves, due to the delivery of treasury shares to Bratel, pursuant to the agreement entered into, as mentioned in this Note, item (b).

(d)

Share issuance costs

As mentioned in item (a) of this Note, under the commitment agreement entered into with the backstoppers, the Company issued 272,148,705 new common shares, as compensation for the year ended December 31, 2015 amountingcommitments assumed in said agreement, at a cost of R$337,464, recognized in share issuance cost as a contra entry to R$4,934,908. On March 23, 2016 the Board of Directors approvedcapital increase, plus R$86,180 related to expenses incurred in the Company profit allocation proposal, subject to approval by the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, to line item accumulated losses.issue process.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

The mandatory minimum dividends, which are calculated pursuant to Article 202 of Law 6404/1976 (Brazilian Corporate Law), were not calculated because the Company reported losses in 2015 and 2014.

 

(e)Share issue costs

Basic and diluted earnings per share

This line item includesOn January 16, 2019, the share issue costs net of taxes amounting to R$377,429, of which R$194,464 is taxes. These costs are relatedCompany issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to the following corporate transactions: (1)holders of subscription warrants. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to the holders of subscription rights that requested subscriptions of the excess common shares. On January 25, 2019, 1,604,268,162 New Common Shares were subscribed and paid in. The end of the capital increase process, through the subscription and payment of all 3,225,806,451 New Common Shares issued as part of the Capital Increase—New Funds, represented a contribution of new funds to the Company totaling R$4,000,000,000.00. This transaction had an impact on earnings per share, since the shareholders were diluted.

The common and preferred shareholders have different rights in accordance withterms of dividends, voting rights, and liquidation, as prescribed by the planCompany’s bylaws. Accordingly, basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share were calculated based on profit (loss) for the business combination betweenyear available to the Companycommon and Pharol and (2)preferred shareholders.

Basic

Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the corporate reorganization of February 27, 2012, and (3) merger of TmarPart with and into Oi. These costs directlyprofit attributable to the mentioned eventsowners of the Company, available to common and preferred shareholders, by the weighted average number of common and preferred shares outstanding during the year.

Diluted

Diluted earnings (loss) per share are basically representedcalculated by expenses onadjusting the preparationweighted average number of prospectusoutstanding common and reports, third-party professional services, feespreferred shares, to estimate the dilutive effect of all convertible securities. Currently the Company does not have any potentially dilutive shares.

The table below shows the calculations of basic and commissions, transfer costs,diluted earnings per share:

   2019  2018   2017 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

   (9,000,434)   24,591,140    (6,365,019) 

Profit (loss) allocated to common shares - basic and diluted

   (8,764,803  22,036,074    (4,896,241

Profit (loss) allocated to preferred shares – basic and diluted

   (235,631  2,555,066    (1,468,778

Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands of shares)

     

Common shares - basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686    519,752 

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915    155,915 

Profit (loss) per share (in reais):

     

Common shares - basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39    (9.42

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39    (9.42

Preferred shares will become voting shares if the Company does not pay minimum dividends to which preferred shares are entitled under the Company’s Bylaws during three consecutive years.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and registration costs.Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(f)27.Other comprehensive income

We recognize in this line item other comprehensive income, which includes hedge accounting gains and losses, actuarial gains and losses, foreign exchange differences arising on translating the net investment in foreign subsidiaries, and the tax effects related to these components, which are not recognized in the statement of profit or loss.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

23.LIABILITIES FOR PENSION BENEFITS

 

(a)

Pension fundsplans

The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor retirement benefit plans (“Pension Funds”) for their employees, provided that they elect to be part of such plan.plan, and current beneficiaries. The table below shows the benefit plans existing pension plans at December 31, 2015.2019.

 

Benefit plans

  

Sponsors

  

Manager

TCSPREV

  Oi, Oi Móvel and BrT Multimídia and Oi Internet  FATL
BrTPREV

TelemarPrev

  Oi, Telemar and Oi Móvel BrT Multimídia and Oi Internet  FATL
TelemarPrevOi, TMAR, Oi Móvel and Oi InternetFATL
PBS-TelemarTMARFATL

PAMEC

  Oi  Oi

PBS-A

  TMAR andTelemar e Oi  SistelSISTEL
PBS-TNCP

PBS-Telemar

TelemarFATL

PBS-TNC

  Oi Móvel  SistelFATL

CELPREV

  Oi Móvel  SistelFATL

PAMA

  Oi and TMARTelemar  SistelSISTEL

Sistel

SISTEL – Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social

FATL – Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social

ForWhenever mentioned in this Note, for purposes of the pension plans, described in this note, the Company canmay also be referred to as the “Sponsor”.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The sponsored plans are valued by independent actuaries at the end of the annual reporting period. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the actuarial valuations were performed by PREVUE Consultoria. The Bylaws provide for the approval of the supplementary pension plan policy, and the joint liability attributed to the defined benefit plans is governedruled by the agreements entered into with the pension fund entities, with the agreement of the National Pension Plan Authority (PREVIC), as regards the specific plans. PREVIC is the official agency that approves and oversees said plans.

The sponsored defined benefit plans are closed to new entrants because they areclose-end pension funds. Participants’ and the sponsors’ contributions are defined in the funding plan.

Underfunded statusActuarial liabilities are recognized for the sponsored defined benefit plans that report an actuarial deficit. For the plans that report an actuarial surplus, assets are recorded when there is an express authorization for offsetting them against future employer contributions.

The unfunded status areProvisions for pension plans

Refer to the recognition of the actuarial deficit of the defined benefit plans, as follows:shown below:

 

   2015   2014 

BrTPREV plan

   399,754     473,554  

PAMEC plan

   2,585     2,981  

Financial obligations - BrTPREV plan (i)

   141,681    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   544,020     476,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   144,589     129,662  

Non-current

   399,431     346,873  
   2019   2018 

Actuarial liabilities

    

Financial obligations—BrTPREV plan (i)

   626,748    574,725 

PAMEC Plan

   6,264    4,397 

Total

   633,012    579,122 

Non-current

   633,012    579,122 

 

(i)Represented by the agreement of

The Company had a financial obligations agreement entered into by the Company andwith Fundação Atlântico intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. This obligation representsWith the additional commitment betweenapproval and ratification of the provision recognized pursuantJRP, the related claim of Fundação Atlântico against Oi is subject to the actuarial assumptionsnew terms and conditions of the financial obligations agreement calculated based on the laws applicable to close-end pension funds, regulated by PREVIC.JRP.

Specifically in 2015,

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the real interest rate adopted under actuarial assumptions was significantly higher thanConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Assets recognized to be offset against future employer contributions

The Company recognized TCSPREV Plan assets related to: (i) sponsor contributions which participants that left the PREVIC interest rate which ledPlan are not entitled to a significant gain inredeem; and (ii) part of the obligation,Plan’s surplus attributed to the sponsor.

The assets recognized in other comprehensive income by the Company.

Over funded status

are used to offset future employer contributions. These assets are broken down as follows:

 

   2015   2014 

TCSPREV plan

   1,061,456     932,403  

TelemarPrev plan

   482,938     237,308  

PBS – Telemar plan

   33,477     10,104  

Other

   (47,924   (74,734
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,529,947     1,105,081  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   753     1,744  

Non-current

   1,529,194     1,103,337  
   2019   2018 

Actuarial assets

    

TCSPREV Plan

   56,559    68,934 

CELPREV Plan

   222    199 

PBS-TNC Plan

   3,264   

Total

   60,045    69,133 

Current

   5,430    4,880 

Non-current

   54,615    64,253 

Characteristics of the sponsored pension plans

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

1)

FATL

FATL, closed-end,close-end, multiple sponsor, multiple plan pension fund, is a nonprofit, private pension-related entity, with financial and administrative independence, headquartered in Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, engaged in the management and administration of pension benefit plans for the employees of its sponsors.

Plans

 

(i)BrTPREV

PBS-Telemar

VariableDefined contribution pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the National Register of Benefit Plans (CNPB) under No. 2002.0017-74.

The monthly, mandatory Basic Contribution of the BrTPREV group Participants correspondsclosed to the product obtained, in whole numbers, by applying a percentage to the Contribution Salary (SP), according to the Participant’s age and option, as follows: (i) Age up to 25 years old - Basic Contribution cohort of 3 and 8 percent of the SP; (ii) Age 26 to 30 years old - Basic Contribution cohort of 4 to 8 percent of the SP; (iii) Age 31 to 35 years old - Basic Contribution cohort of 5 to 8 percent of the SP; (iv) Age 36 to 40 years old - Basic Contribution cohort of 6 to 8 percent of the SP; (v) Age 41 to 45 years old - Basic Contribution cohort of 7 to 8 percent of the SP; and (vi) Age 46 years old or more - Basic Contribution cohort of 8 percent of the SP.

The monthly Contribution of the Fundador/Alternativo group (merged) Participants corresponds to the sum of: (i) 3 percent charged on the Contribution Salary; (ii) 2 percent charged on the Contribution Salary that exceeds half of the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary, and (iii) 6.3 percent charged on the Contribution Salary that that exceeds the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary.

A BrTPREV group Participant’s Voluntary Contribution corresponds to the product obtained, in whole numbers, by applying a percentage of up 22 percent, elected by the Participant, to the Participation Salary. The Sporadic Contribution of a BrTPREV group Participant is optional and both its amount and frequency are freely chosen by the Participant, provided it is not lower than one (1) UPBrT (BrT’s pension unit). The Sponsor does not make any counterpart contribution to the Participant’s Voluntary or Sporadic Contribution.

The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors. The plan is funded under the capitalization approach.

(ii)PBS-Telemar

Defined benefit pension Benefit Plan,new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0015-56.

The contributions from Active Participants of thePBS-Telemar Benefit Plan correspond to the sum of: (i) 0.50.5% to 1.5 percent1.5% of the Contribution Salary (according to the participant’s age on enrollment

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

date); (ii) 1% of Contribution Salary that exceeds half of one Standard Unit; and (iii) 11% of the Contribution Salary that exceeds one Standard Unit. The Sponsors’ contributions are equivalent to 8% of the payroll of active participants of the plan. The plan is funded under the capitalizationcapital formation approach.

 

(iii)(ii)

TelemarPrev

Variable contribution pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0065-74.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

A participant’s regular contribution is comprised of two portions: (i) basic - basic—equivalent to 2% of the contribution salary; and (ii) standard - standard—equivalent to 3% of the positive difference between the total contribution salary and the social security contribution. The additional extraordinary contributions from participants are optional and can be made in multiples of 0.5% of the Contribution Salary, for a period of not less than six (6) months. Nonrecurring extraordinary contributions from a participant are also optional and cannot be lower than 5% of the Contribution Salary ceiling.

The Plan’s Charter requires the parity between participants’ and sponsors’ contributions, up to the limit of 8% of the Contribution Salary, even though a sponsor is not required to match Extraordinary Contributions made by participants. The plan is funded under the capitalizationcapital formation approach.

 

(iv)(iii)

TCSPREV

Variable contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0028-38.

On November 30, 2018, date of the actual merger, TCSPREV Benefits Plan merged the BrTPREV Benefits Plan (CNPBNo. 2002.0017-74) to become the full successor of this Plan’s rights and obligations, assuming all its assets and liabilities. This merger was approved by PREVIC Administrative Rule 995, of October 24, 2018, published on Federal Official Gazette No. 208 of October 29, 2018.

With the recognition and registration of the merger, the Participants and Beneficiaries linked to BrTPREV automatically became Participants and Beneficiaries TCSPREV, in accordance with the categories of Beneficiaries existing on the day prior to the merger date.

The monthly, mandatory Basic Contribution of the Active Participants of the TCSPREV group Participantsand BrTPREV corresponds to the productoutcome obtained in whole numbers, by applying a percentage chosen by the Participant,that may range from 3% to 8% on the Contribution Salary, (SP) as follows:pursuant to the age and option of each Participant. The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors.

The monthly Contribution of the Fundador/Alternativo Plan Participants, previously merged with and into BrTPREV, corresponds to the sum of: (i) Age up3% charged on the Contribution Salary; (ii) 2% charged on the Contribution Salary that exceeds half of the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary, and (iii) 6.3% charged on the Contribution Salary that that exceeds the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary. The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors.

In accordance with regulatory criteria, the Sponsors’ contributions, related to 25TCSPREV and BrTPREV Participants are automatically cancelled on the month subsequent to the month when the same Participant reaches the age of 60 years old, - basic contribution cohort10 years of 3Credited Services, and 8 percent10 years of Plan membership.

For participants who migrated from thePBS-TCS Plan to the SP; (ii) Age 26TCSPREV Plan, the Sponsors’ contributions are cancelled on the month subsequent to 30the month when a Participant reaches the age of 57 years old, - basic contribution cohort10 years of 4 to 8 percentuninterrupted membership ofPBS-TCS and the SP; (iii) Age 31 toTCSPREV Plan, 10 years of Credited Services at the Sponsor, and 35 years old - basic contribution cohort of 5 to 8 percent ofregistration with the SP; (iv) Age 36 to 40 years old - basic contribution cohort of 6 to 8 percent of the SP; (v) Age 41 to 45 years old - basic contribution cohort of 7 to 8 percent of the SP; and (vi) Age 46 years old or more - basic contribution cohort of 8 percent of the SP.official Social Security scheme.

The TCSPREV groupand BrTPREV Participant’s Voluntary Contribution corresponds to the product obtained, in whole numbers, by applying a percentage of up 22%, elected by the Participant, to the Participation Salary.

The Sporadic Contribution of a Participant is optional and both its amount and frequency are freely chosen by the Participant, as defined by the TCSPREV or BrTPREV Plan, provided it is not lower than one (1) UPTCS (TCSPREV’s pension unit).(TCSPREV Pension Unit) or one (1) UPBrT (BrT’s Pension Unit), respectively. The Sponsor does not make any counterpart contribution to the Participant’s Voluntary or Sporadic contribution.

The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors. The plan is funded under the capitalizationcapital formation approach.

 

2)SISTEL

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(iv)

PBS-TNC

Defined contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0013-19.

The contributions from Active Participants of thePBS-TNC Benefit Plan correspond to the sum of: (i) 0.28% to 0.85% of the Contribution Salary (according to the participant’s age on enrollment date); (ii) 0.57% of Contribution Salary that exceeds half of one Standard Unit; and (iii) 6.25% of the Contribution Salary that exceeds one Standard Unit. The Sponsors’ contributions are equivalent to a percentage of the payroll of the employees who are Active Plan Participants, as set on an annual basis in the Costing Plan.

The contribution of the Current Beneficiaries (only those who receive a retirement allowance) is equivalent to a percentage to be set on an annual basis in the Costing Plan, applied on the overall benefit, limited to the amount of the allowance.

The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

 

(v)

CELPREV

SistelDefined Contribution Pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2004.0009-29.

On January 12, 2018, pursuant to Administrative Rule 22, published on the Federal Official Gazette of January 16, 2018, PREVIC approved the new text of the Plan’s Charter, which closes the number of CELPREV participants and prevents new entrants.

The Participant’s Basic Regular Contribution corresponds to the product obtained by applying a percentage, 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% or 2%, depending on each participant’s option, to his or her Contribution Salary (SP). The Sponsors contribute with an amount equivalent to such contribution, less the monthly, mandatory contribution of each Sponsor required to fund risk costs (Sick Pay Benefit).

The Additional Regular Contribution corresponds The Participant’s Basic Regular Contribution corresponds to the product obtained by applying a percentage ranging from 0% to 6%, in multiples of 0.5%, as elected by each participant, on the Contribution Salary exceeding 10 Plan Benchmark Units (URPs). The Sponsors contribute with an equivalent amount.

The Participant’s Voluntary Contribution corresponds to a whole number percentage, freely elected by each participant, applied on the Contribution Salary. The Sponsor does not make any counterpart contribution to this contribution.

The Sponsor’s Nonrecurring Contribution is voluntarily and corresponds to applying a percentage ranging from 50% to 150% of the aggregate Basic Regular and Additional Regular Contributions of the Sponsor, pursuant to consistent,non-discriminatory criteria, made with the frequency set by the Sponsor.

The Sponsor’s Special Contribution is specific for new Plan members who have joined the plan within 90 days starting March 18, 2004.

The Sponsor’s monthly, mandatory Risk Contribution, required to fund the Sick Pay Benefit, corresponds to percentage ofNon-migrating Participants’ Contribution Salary payroll.

The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

2)

SISTEL

SISTEL is a nonprofit, private welfare and pension entity, established in November 1977, which is engaged in creating and operating private plans to grant benefits in the form of lump sums or annuities, supplementary or similar to the government retirement pensions, to the employees and their families who are linked to Sistel’sSISTEL’s sponsors.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Plans

 

(i)

PBS-A

Multiemployer pensionDefined benefit plan jointly sponsored with other sponsors associated to the provision of telecommunications services and offered to participants who held the status of beneficiaries on January 1, 2000.

Contributions to thePBS-A are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit and the Company is jointly and severally liable, along with other fixed-line telecommunications companies, for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of the PBS-A plan. As of December 31, 2015, the PBS-A plan had a surplus of R$2,636,281. No significant contribution in 2015, 2014 and 2013.

(ii)PBS-TNCP

PBS-TNCP plan is funded under the capitalization approach. PBS-TNCP plan has been closed to new members since April 2004. Contributions to the PBS-TNCP plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit. As ofat December 31, 2015,2019, date of the PBS-TNCPlast actuarial valuation, the plan hadpresented a surplus.

In December 2019, the National Pension Plan Authority (PREVIC) approved the allocation of a special reserve of thePBS-A Benefit Plan, with the reversal of amounts to sponsors and improvement of benefits, in the form of temporary income, to the beneficiaries. The total amount of the Company’s share of thePBS-A’ssurplus corresponds to R$669,054 (R$140,274 in the Company), to be received in 36 monthly installments, adjusted by the Plan’s profitability, the accounting recognition of R$25,351. No significant contribution in 2015, 2014 and 2013.which as the installments are received, with an impact on other comprehensive income, as required by IAS 19.

 

(iii)(ii)CELPREV

PAMA

In 2004, Amazônia (merged with and into TNL PCS) obtained from PREVIC the approval to create a new Pension Plan. The variable contribution plan, called CelPrev Amazônia (“CELPREV”), was offered to the employees who did not participate of the PBS-TNCP plan, and to new employees hired by its subsidiary. The participants of the PBS-TNCP plan were offered the possibility and encouraged to migrate to the CELPREV plan. Approximately 27.3% of Amazônia’s active employees that were participants in the PBS-TNCP plan migrated to the CELPREV plan. As of December 31, 2015, the CELPREV plan had a surplus of R$2,412. No significant contribution in 2015, 2014 and 2013.

(v) PAMA

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

PAMA is a multiemployer healthcare plan for retired employees aimed at providing medical care coverage to beneficiaries, with copayments by and contributions from the latter. The PAMA plan has been closedlatter, provided that linked to new members since February 2000, other than new beneficiaries of current members and employees that are coveredthe Defined Benefit pension plans managed by the PBS-A plan who have not yet electedSISTEL.

Up to join the PAMA plan. In December 2003,2014, the Company began sponsoringdid not consider the PCE –Special Coverage Plan, or the PCE plan, a health-care plan managed by Sistel. The PCE plan is open to employees that are covered by the PAMA plan. From February to July 2004, December 2005 to April 2006, June to September 2008, July 2009 to February 2010, March to November 2010, February 2011 to March 2012assets and March 2012 until today, the Company offered incentives to our employees to migrate fromliabilities of the PAMA plan because it is multi-sponsored and similar to defined contribution plans (benefits paid are limited to the PCEamount of the contributions received by the plan), and there are no other obligations in addition to the existing balances.

However, as from the issue of National Supplementary Healthcare Agency’s position that SISTEL is a sponsor of the healthcare plan as defined by Law 9656/1998 and as a result does not qualify as a Healthcare plan operator, SISTEL is liable for some plan obligations, even though it is not make entitled to revenue from the corresponding contributions. Thus, it is no longer possible to qualify this plan as a defined contribution plan.

In October 2015, in compliance with a court order, SistelSISTEL transferred the surpluses of thePBS-A benefits plan, amounting to R$3,042 million, to ensure the solvency of the plan PAMA. Of the total amount transferred, R$2,127 million is related to the plans sponsored by the Company, apportioned proportionallyprorated to the obligationsportions of the defined benefit plan.

Asobligations. The amount was established based on actuarial studies prepared by an outside consulting firm using assumptions consistent with the population of December 31, 2015,PAMA users and the projection of medical expenses increase inherent to this population. Beginning on the issue of said court order, the Company started to calculate and disclose information on the PAMA plan had a surplus of R$1,154,176. No significant contribution in 2015, 2014 and 2013.actuarial obligations, pursuant to IAS 19 criteria.

 

3)PAMEC-BrT -

PAMEC-BrT—Assistance plan managed by the Company

Defined benefitHealthcare plan intended to provide medical care to the retirees and survivor pensioners linked to the TCSPREV pension planBenefit Plan. Benefit Plan managed by FATL.

The contributions forPAMEC-BrT were fully paid in July 1998, through a bullet payment.single appropriation. However, as this plan is now administrated by the Company, after the transfer of management by Fundação 14 in November 2007, there are no assets recognized to cover current expenses, and the actuarial obligation is fully recognized in the Company’s liabilities.

Funded Status

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Statuses of the sponsored plans, revalued at the end of the reporting period

Changes in the actuarial obligations, fair value of assets and amounts recognized in the balance sheet

 

  2015  2014 
  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-
Telemar
  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-
Telemar
  PAMEC 

Projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year

  502,433    2,023,849    2,885,744    247,833    2,981    481,055    1,941,701    2,722,980    235,884    3,418  

Service cost

  586    142    2,785    80     797    230    3,592    121   

Interest cost

  57,066    228,738    328,289    28,089    345    54,689    219,630    310,467    26,755    396  

Benefits paid

  (44,535  (177,696  (219,465  (19,942  (122  (36,569  (167,661  (216,394  (18,507  (110

Participant’s contributions

     43        52   

Changes in actuarial assumptions

  (18,420  (74,280  (204,806  (11,956  (619  2,461    29,949    65,099    3,528    (723
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year

  497,130    2,000,753    2,792,547    244,147    2,585    502,433    2,023,849    2,885,744    247,833    2,981  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2019 
   PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
   TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Present value of actuarial obligation at beginning of year

   3,256,516   328,130   4,165,284   4,811,332   35,043   26   4,397   3,422,402 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

   283,542   28,419   367,633   415,476   3,066   2   414   308,512 

Current service cost

   250   34   1,613    82   2    322 

Participant contributions made in the year

   15   28       

Benefits paid, net

   (262,369  (23,683  (285,160  (429,813  (2,460   (484  (229,329

Increase/(decrease) of assets due to changes in the Plan

      183,195     

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

   500,731   32,358   729,147   660,695   4,984   1   1,937   641,713 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

         

Present value of actuarial obligation at the end of the year

   3,778,685   365,286   4,978,517   5,640,885   40,715   31   6,264   4,143,620 

Fair value of assets at the beginning of the year

   3,621,068   379,000   4,508,570   7,316,395   60,062   3,340    3,443,944 

Return on plan assets

   313,409   33,149   394,800   649,891   5,255   293    312,145 

Amortizing contributions received from sponsor

         484  

Sponsor

   13   65       

Participants

   15   28       

Benefits payment

   (262,369  (23,683  (285,160  (429,813  (2,460   (484  (229,329

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

   345,124   42,087   680,478   730,389   1,980   558    895,983 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

         

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

   4,017,260   430,646   5,298,688   8,266,862   64,837   4,191    4,422,743 

(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset) amount

   (238,575  (65,360  (320,171  (2,625,977  (24,122  (4,160  6,264   (279,123

Effect of the asset/onerous liability recognition ceiling

   182,016   65,360   320,171   2,625,977   20,858   3,938    279,123 

(=) Recognized net actuarial liability/(asset)

   (56,559     (3,264  (222  6,264  

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

  2015  2014 
  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-
Telemar
  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-
Telemar
  PAMEC 

Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year

  1,434,836    1,550,295    3,123,052    257,937     1,442,657    1,301,556    3,204,535    264,224   

Actual return on plan assets

  168,285    88,465    371,898    39,516     28,748    293,096    134,911    12,091   

Company’s contributions

   139,935     71      123,304     77   

Participant’s contributions

     42        52   

Benefits paid

  (44,535  (177,696  (219,465  (19,942   (36,569  (167,661  (216,394  (18,507 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

  1,558,586    1,600,999    3,275,485    277,624     1,434,836    1,550,295    3,123,052    257,937   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  2015  2014 
  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-
Telemar
  PAMEC 
          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded (unfunded) status of plan

  (1,061,456  399,754    (482,938  (33,477  2,585    (932,403  473,554    (237,308  (10,104  2,981  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  2018 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
  BrTPREV
(*)
  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Present value of actuarial obligation at beginning of year

  2,524,728   625,266   307,658   3,825,053   4,675,447   31,938   41   3,300   3,113,772 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  218,105   78,223   29,113   362,886   439,285   3,027   4   317   299,881 

Current service cost

  74   196   41   1,870    55   3    273 

Participant contributions made in the year

  12   2   34     1    

Benefits paid, net

  (177,215  (61,605  (23,441  (272,271  (422,312  2,527    (688  (237,744

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

  60,942   (12,212  14,725   247,746   118,912   (2,505  (22  1,468   246,220 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

  (2,626,646  2,626,646        

Present value of actuarial obligation at the end of the year

   3,256,516   328,130   4,165,284   4,811,332   35,043   26   4,397   3,422,402 

Fair value of assets at the beginning of the year

  1,895,608   1,953,967   360,700   4,142,553   7,462,931   59,723   3,030    3,243,093 

Return on plan assets

  161,415   200,469   34,332   394,097   713,294   5,759   298    312,593 

Amortizing contributions received from sponsor

  11         

Regular contributions received by plan

  12   4   100     3   1   688  

Sponsor

   2   66     2    

Participants

  12   2   34     1    

Benefits payment

  (177,215  (61,605  (23,441  (272,271  (422,312  (2,505   (688  (237,744

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

  36,579   (388,177  7,309   244,191   (437,518  (2,918  11    126,002 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

  (1,916,410  1,916,410        

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

   3,621,068   379,000   4,508,570   7,316,395   60,062   3,340    3,443,944 

(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset) amount

   (364,552)   (50,870)   (343,286)   (2,505,063)   (25,019)   (3,314)   4,397   (21,542) 

Effect of the asset/onerous liability recognition ceiling

   295,618   50,870   343,286   2,505,063   25,019   3,115    21,542 

(=) Recognized net actuarial liability/(asset)

   (68,934)       (199)   4,397  

Net periodic defined benefit pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014

(*)

Plan merged with into TCSPREV on November 30, 2018.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and 2013 includes the following:

   2015 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Net service cost

   586    142    2,785    80   

Interest cost

   57,066    228,738    328,289    28,089    345  

Expected return on plan assets

   (162,701  (180,363  (356,313  (29,293 

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

     47,438    

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636  1,552     

Amortization of initial transition obligation

     (4,203  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (110,684  50,069    17,996    (1,124  345  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   2014 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Net service cost

   797    230    3,592    121   

Interest cost

   54,689    219,630    310,467    26,755    396  

Expected return on plan assets

   (150,078  (151,143  (367,435  (30,117 

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

   (5,831  6,940    9,131    

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636  1,552     

Amortization of initial transition obligation

     (4,202  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (106,059  77,209    (48,447  (3,241  396  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   2013 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Net service cost

   1,837    782    12,206    235   

Interest cost

   49,310    194,520    282,508    23,839    427  

Expected return on plan assets

   (145,230  (130,340  (305,649  (27,942 

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

   (19,443  23,698    30,174    

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636  1,552     

Amortization of initial transition obligation

     (4,203  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (119,162  90,212    15,036    (3,868  427  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The net periodic pension cost expectedCompany determines the amount available to bededuct from future contributions according to the applicable legal provisions and the benefit plan charter. The amount of the asset linked to the TCSPREV,PBS-TNC and CELPREV Plans recognized in 2016 are as follows:

   2016 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Net service cost

   551    154    2,042    78   

Interest cost

   62,214    249,319    350,701    30,475    330  

Expected return on plan assets

   (193,747  (191,438  (381,993  (32,876 

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

     4,380    

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636  1,552     

Amortization of initial transition obligation

      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (136,618  59,587    (24,870  (2,323  330  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The sponsors’ contributions to the pension plans managed by FATL and SISTEL estimated for 2016 amount R$144,598 and R$30, respectively.

The following actuarial assumptions were used to determineCompany’s financial statements does not exceed the actuarial present value of future contributions.

Expenses (revenue) components of the Company’s projected benefit obligation:benefits

 

   2015 
      BrTPREV  TelemarPrev 
      and  and 
   TCSPREV  PAMEC  PBS-Telemar 

Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations

   13.10  13.10  13.10

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   13.10  13.10  13.10

Annual salary increases

   6.45  7.08  5.50

Rate of compensation increase

   5.50  5.50  5.50

Inflation rate assumption used in the above

   5.50  5.50  5.50
   2019 
   PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
   TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC   PAMA 

Current service cost

   250   34   1,613    82   2     322 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

   283,541   28,419   367,633   415,476   3,066   2   414    308,512 

Return on plan assets

   (313,409  (33,149  (394,800  (649,891  (5,255  (293    (312,146

Interest on onerous liability

   24,000   4,725   27,167   234,415   2,065   273     3,634 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

          

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

   (5,618)   29   1,613    (42)   (16)   414    322 

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

   18,005   36   (1,613   (2,382  (7  1,937    (322

Total expense (income) recognized

   12,387   65     (2,424)   (23)   2,351   

 

   2014 
      BrTPREV  TelemarPrev 
      and  and 
   TCSPREV  PAMEC  PBS-Telemar 

Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations

   11.83  11.83  11.83

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   11.83  11.83  11.83

Annual salary increases

   7.93  7.93  7.93

Rate of compensation increase

   5.50  5.50  5.50

Inflation rate assumption used in the above

   5.50  5.50  5.50
  2018 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
  BrTPREV  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Current service cost

  74   196   41   1,870    55   3    274 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  218,103   78,222   29,114   362,887   439,285   3,027   4   317   299,881 

Return on plan assets

  (161,415  (200,469  (34,332  (394,097  (713,295  (5,759  (298   (312,593

Interest on onerous liability

   112,564   5,214   31,210   274,010   2,731   294    12,712 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

          (274

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

  56,762   (9,487)   37   1,870    54   3   317  

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

  24,364   42,233   30   (1,870   (891  (201  1,469  

Total expense (income) recognized

  81,126   32,746   67     (837)   (198)   1,786  

 

   2013 
      BrTPREV  TelemarPrev 
      and  and 
   TCSPREV  PAMEC  PBS-Telemar 

Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations

   11.83  11.83  11.83

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   11.83  11.83  11.83

Annual salary increases

   7.93  7.93  7.93

Rate of compensation increase

   5.50  5.50  5.50

Inflation rate assumption used in the above

   5.50  5.50  5.50

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

  2017 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL
CARE PLANS
 
  BrTPREV  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Current service cost

  102   457   33   1,545    48   7    170,184 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  260,649   64,927   32,488   397,842   499,261   3,328   15   378   286,035 

Return on plan assets

  (210,579  (215,509  (35,817  (440,696  (781,757  (6,343  (301   (331,699

Interest on onerous liability

   136,800   3,317   42,854   282,496   3,014   286    45,664 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

    (21  (1,545   (47  (7   (170,184

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

  50,172   (13,325)        378  

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

  78,147   28,149        (232 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

         

Total expense (income) recognized

  128,319   14,824        146  

Main actuarial assumptions adopted on December 31, 2019

  PENSION PLANS MEDICAL CARE PLANS
  TCSPREV PBS-Telemar TelemarPrev PBS-A PBS-TNC CELPREV PAMEC PAMA

Nominal discount rate of actuarial liability

 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.64% 7.64%

Estimated inflation rate

 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80%

Estimated nominal salary increase index

 4.00% 4.00% Per sponsor N.A. 8.82% 7.53% N.A. N.A.

Estimated nominal benefit growth rate

 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% N.A. N.A.

Total expected rate of return on plan assets

 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.64% 7.64%

General mortality biometric table

 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 20%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 20%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 N.A. AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender

Biometric disability table

 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 N.A. Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%

Biometric disabled mortality table

 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 N.A. AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender

Turnover rate

 4.80% Nil Per sponsor,
null starting at
50 years old
and null for
Settled Benefit
 Nil Nil 2% Nil Nil

Starting age of the benefits

 57 years old 57 years old 55 years old N.A. 57 years old 55 years old N.A. N.A.

Nominal medical costs growth rate

 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 6.91% 6.91%

N.A. = Not applicable.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES—2019

(a)   Plans’ assets and liabilities correspond to the amounts as at December 31, 2019.

(b)   Master file data used for the plans managed by FATL and for the PAMEC plan are as at July 31, 2019, and for SISTEL are as at June 30, 2019, both projected for December 31, 2019.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Investment policy of the plans

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The investment policies and strategies for the two single-employer benefit pension plans PBS-Telemar and TelemarPrev are subject to Resolution N° 3,121strategy of the National Monetary Council,Benefits Plans is described in their investment policy, which establishes investment guidelines.

TelemarPrev is a defined contribution plan with individual capitalization. Management allocatesannually approved by the investments in order to conciliate the expectationsgoverning board of the sponsors, active and assisted participants. The assetssponsored funds. This policy establishes that investment decision-making must take into consideration: (i) the preservation of capital; (ii) the diversification of investments; (iii) the risk appetite according to conservative assumptions; (iv) the expected return rate based on December 31, 2015 consists mainlyactuarial requirements; (v) the compatibility of investment liquidity with the following portfolio: 91% in debt securities, 5% in equity of Brazilian companies and 4% in real estate and other assets.

PBS-Telemar plan is closed for new participants and the vast majority of the current participants are receiving their benefits. The mathematical reserves are readjusted annually considering an interest rate of 6% per annum over the variation of the National Consumer Price Index (“INPC”). Therefore, management’s strategy is to guarantee resources that exceed this readjustment. Management also prepares a long-term cash-flow to match assets and liabilities. Therefore, debt securities investments are preferred when choosing the allocation of its assets, representing 88% of the portfolio in December 31, 2015.

The investment policies and strategies for BrTPREV, TCSPREV and PAMEC, which is approved annually by the pension fund’s board states that the investment decisions should consider: (i) capital preservation; (ii) diversification; (iii) risk tolerance; (iv) expected returns versus benefit plan’s interest rates; (v) compatibility between investments liquidity and pensions’plans’ cash flows, and (vi) reasonable management costs. ItThe policy also defines the volume rangesinterval for the different types of investment allowed for the pension funds, which are: domesticas follows: fixed income, domestic equity,variable income, structured investments, investments abroad, loans to pension fund’s membersparticipants, and real estate. In the fixed income portfolio, only low credit risk securities are allowed.

Derivative instruments are only permitted for hedging purposes. Loans are restricted to certain credit limits. Tactical allocation is decided by the investment committee, consisted of the pension fund’s officers, investment manager and one member designated by the Board. Execution is performed by the Finance Department.estate investments.

The average ceilings set for the different types of investment permitted for pension funds, as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:

 

ASSET SEGMENT  TCSPREV BrTPREV PBS-
Telemar
 TelemarPrev   TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 

Fixed income

   100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

Variable income

   17.00 17.00 10.00 17.00   70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    0.00% 

Structured investments

   20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00   20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    0.00% 

Investments abroad

   5.00 5.00 2.00 5.00   10.00%    10.00%    10.00%    0.00%    10.00%    10.00%    0.00% 

Real estate

   8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00   20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    0.00% 

Loans to participants

   15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00   15.00%    15.00%    15.00%    3.00%    15.00%    15.00%    0.00% 

The allocation of plan assets as at December 31, 20152019 is as follows:

ASSET SEGMENT

  TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 

Fixed income

   86.06%    90.57%    92.46%    95.10%    85.61%    88.20%    100.00% 

Variable income

   1.63%    0.34%    0.96%    0.00%    0.48%    3.17%    0.00% 

Structured investments

   10.85%    7.84%    5.04%    0.00%    13.71%    7.25%    0.00% 

Investments abroad

   0.21%    0.00%    0.11%    0.00%    0.00%    0.50%    0.00% 

Real estate

   0.83%    0.90%    0.76%    4.10%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00% 

Loans to participants

   0.42%    0.35%    0.67%    0.80%    0.20%    0.88%    0.00% 

Total

   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years endedThe allocation of plan assets as at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)2018 is as follows:

 

ASSET SEGMENT  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  PBS-
Telemar
  TelemarPrev 

Fixed income

   84.25  92.17  88.01  91.40

Variable income

   3.25  1.32  1.78  2.21

Equity securities

   11.45  5.21  9.12  5.08

Real estate

   0.72  0.69  0.74  0.70

Loans to participants

   0.33  0.62  0.35  0.61

Total

   100.00  100.00  100.00  100.00

Expected contribution and benefits

The estimated benefit payments, which reflect future services, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows (unaudited):

   TCSPREV   BrTPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev 

2016

   44,429     195,106     23,028     230,887  

2017

   46,725     203,295     24,131     244,260  

2018

   49,143     211,461     25,367     258,614  

2019

   51,562     219,708     26,650     272,844  

2020

   54,040     228,076     27,866     287,623  

2021 until 2025

   308,753     1,261,909     157,295     1,684,353  

ASSET SEGMENT

  TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 
              

Fixed income

   86.17%    90.49%    92.51%    93.70%    83.87%    88.80%    100.00% 

Variable income

   2.90%    1.30%    1.61%    0.77%    2.51%    4.00%   

Structured investments

   9.23%    6.65%    4.21%    0.03%    12.84%    5.68%   

Investments abroad

   0.85%    0.92%    0.79%         

Real estate

   0.43%    0.38%    0.67%    4.67%    0.27%    1.15%   

Loans to participants

   0.42%    0.26%    0.21%    0.83%    0.51%    0.37%   

Total

   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

 

(b)

Employee profit sharing

In the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, the Company and its subsidiaries recognized provisions for employee profit sharing based on individual and corporate goal attainment estimates totaling R$70,199247,178 (R$265,753 in Company2018).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$210,054 on a consolidated basis., unless otherwise stated)

 

(c)

Share-based compensation

A long-term incentives plan based on shares granted the Executives and the Board of Directors (Executive Committee’s Stock Option Plan and the Board of Directors’ Stock Option Plan) was submitted to and approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2019.

However, in light of the opinion issued by the Federal Public Prosecution Office and the decision issued by the Judicial Reorganization Court on April 24, 2019 on the new long-term incentives plans, the Oi’s Board of Directors decided and communicated to the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting that such plans would only be implemented after a new decision of said Court, authorizing its implementation, is issued.

Beginning December 17, 2019, with the Ruling awarded by the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court on Bill of ReviewNo. 0035453-90.2019.8.19.0000, filed by the Public Prosecution Office, the decision that the Stock Option Plan for the members of the Board of Directors should not be implemented until the end of the judicial reorganization was maintained and the implementation of Stock Action Plan for said Company Executives was authorized.

In compliance with the decision referred to above, in December 2019 the Company implemented the New Stock Option Plan for the Executive Committee, according to all the rules and conditions approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2019.

Executives’ Stock Action Plan

The purpose of this plan is to allow granting shares to Company Executives, aiming at promoting their high engagement and commitment to ensure the achievement of the strategic goals consistently with the Company’s and its shareholders’ medium- and long-term interests.

The plan provides for granting annual shares over a three-year period that shall not exceed 1.5% of the Company’s share capital.

The number of shares per grant is calculated individually for the purpose of maintaining the competitiveness of the executives with regard to the performance of their duties and shall be delivered to them provided that the plan’s performance condition is met.

The information used in the executives’ stock option plan’s assessment is as follows:

Grant date

  Stock
dilution
percentage
  Number of
shares
granted
   Vesting
portions
   Vesting dates   Average
share value at
the grant date
   Estimated fair
value at the
vesting date
 

12/30/2019

   0.57  33,704,937    1/3    12/30/2020    0.95    34,406 
   1/3    12/30/2021 
   1/3    12/30/2022 

The fair value of the granted stock options will be determined based on the vesting period and recognized as the services are provided. The estimated fair value at the acquisition date was measured taking into account the price of the shares granted on December 30, 2019, adjusted by the weighted average cost of capital of 10.98%, estimated for the three-year period of the program, brought to present value at the period’s opportunity cost of 14.67%, which corresponds to the fair value of the share.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

28.

SEGMENT REPORTING

The Long-term Incentive Program (2015-2017), approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 13, 2015, seeks a greater alignment with the Company’s management cycle and business priorities. The Program consists of the payment of gross cash reward, in accordance with the Law Laws and Regulations, as a result of the compliance with the goals set for 2015-2017. The gross cash reward is benchmarked to the quotation of Company shares. We also disclose that the beneficiaries are not entitled to receiving Company shares since the Program does not provide for the transfer of shares to its beneficiaries. This share-based compensation program has been recorded as a liability in the consolidated financial statements. No relevant provisions were recorded in 2015 considering the Company performance.

24.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company uses operating segment information for decision-making. The Company identified only one operating segment that corresponds to the telecommunications business in Brazil.

In addition to the telecommunications business in Brazil, the Company conducts other businesses that individually or in aggregate do not meet any of the quantitative indicators that would require their disclosure as reportable business segments. These businesses refer basically to the following companies: Mobile Telecommunications Limited in Namibia, Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, ELTA – Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola, and Timor Telecom, which provide fixed and mobile telecommunications services and publish telephone directories, and which have been consolidated since May 2014.

The revenue generation is assessed by the CompanyBoard of Directors based on a view segmented by customer, into the following categories:

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Residential Services, focused on the sale of fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), and pay TV;

 

Personal Mobility, focused on the sale of mobile telephony services to subscription and prepaid customers, and mobile broadband customers; and

 

SMEs/Corporate, which includes corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, and large corporate customers.

Telecommunications in Brazil

In preparing the financial statementsinformation for this reportable segment, the transactions between the companies included in the segment have been eliminated. The financial information of this reportable segment for the yearsperiods ended December 31, 2015, 20142019 and 20132018 is as follows:

 

  2015   2014   2013   2019 2018 2017 

Residential

   9,779,218     9,995,205     10,302,910  

Personal mobility

   8,430,890     9,011,200     9,289,893  

SMEs/Corporate

   7,973,893     8,311,458     8,454,923  

Residential services

   7,264,262   8,401,599   9,170,835 

Residential Fixed-Line

   3,281,905  4,170,105  4,880,738 

Broadband

   2,187,015  2,423,291  2,641,836 

Pay-TV

   1,752,053  1,755,061  1,577,745 

Interconnection

   43,289  53,142  70,516 

Personal mobility services

   7,017,311   7,250,462   7,644,515 

Mobile Telephony

   6,601,729  6,607,613  6,914,862 

Interconnection

   257,099  447,980  500,106 

Handsets, sim cards and other accessories

   158,483  194,869  229,547 

SMEs/Corporate (B2B) services

   5,527,817   5,980,807   6,485,899 

Other services and businesses

   257,090     295,297     374,421     140,004   226,985   255,691 

Net operating revenue

   26,441,091     27,613,160     28,422,147  

Total net operating revenue

   19,949,394  21,859,853  23,556,940 

Operating expenses

          

Depreciation and amortization

   (5,996,157   (5,630,238   (5,691,824   (6,804,870 (5,740,079 (5,031,477

Interconnection

   (1,757,277   (2,674,915   (3,965,623   (484,061 (653,867 (771,212

Personnel

   (2,618,139   (2,749,404   (2,534,222   (2,487,632 (2,554,375 (2,749,038

Third-party services

   (6,154,900   (6,163,447   (6,119,733   (5,957,763 (5,833,570 (6,149,189

Network maintenance services

   (1,860,646   (1,906,789   (2,328,140

Grid maintenance services

   (1,012,857 (1,102,809 (1,235,760

Handset and other costs

   (226,826   (702,379   (515,377   (159,442 (185,436 (214,102

Advertising and publicity

   (379,537   (656,487   (556,500   (494,348 (379,676 (410,495

Rentals and Insurance

   (3,553,881   (3,095,667   (2,119,684

Rentals and insurance

   (2,571,245 (4,194,135 (4,152,521

Provisions/reversals

   (860,166   (779,314   (656,849   (216,438 (202,122 (469,440

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (692,935   (628,605   (922,779

Expected losses on trade receivables

   (488,269 (689,735 (740,576

Impairment losses

   (501,465       (2,111,022 (291,758 4,747,141 

Taxes and other expenses

   (902,507   (1,440,968   (1,397,982   (18,396 (201,296 (475,018

Other operating income, net

   277,954     3,206,943     2,369,555  

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (6,974 (5,016,358 (8,196,415

OPERATING INCOME BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES) AND TAXES

   1,214,609     4,391,890     3,982,989     (2,863,923)  (5,185,363)  (2,291,162) 

FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES)

          

Financial income

   4,493,042     1,332,723     1,375,217     2,659,074  30,850,746  6,917,975 

Financial expenses

   (11,013,939   (5,870,193   (4,677,173   (8,452,638 (4,339,053 (9,246,160

PRETAX INCOME

   (5,306,288   (145,580   681,033  

PRE-TAX PROFIT (LOSS)

   (8,657,487)  21,326,330  (4,619,347) 

Income tax and social contribution

   (3,202,817   (615,406   (76,610   57,174  3,270,890  (1,137,715

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   (8,509,105   (760,986   604,423  

PROFIT (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR

   (8,600,313)  24,597,220  (5,757,062) 

Reconciliation of revenue

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and income (loss) and information per geographic market

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Reconciliation of revenue and profit (loss) for the quarter and information per geographic market

In the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 2013,2017, the reconciliation of the revenue offrom the segment Telecommunicationstelecommunications in Brazil and total consolidated revenue is as follows:

 

   2015   2014   2013 

Net operating revenue

      

Revenue related to the reportable segment

   26,441,091     27,613,160     28,422,147  

Revenue related to other businesses (i)

   912,674     633,939    

Consolidated net operating revenue

   27,353,765     28,247,099     28,422,147  

(i)In 2014 the Africa and Timor business were consolidated after May 1.
   2019   2018   2017 

Net operating revenue

      

Revenue related to the reportable segment

   19,949,394    21,859,853    23,556,940 

Revenue related to other businesses

   186,789    200,161    232,714 

Net operating revenue (Note 5)

   20,136,183    22,060,014    23,789,654 

In the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 2013,2017, the reconciliation between the profit (loss)or loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes of the segment telecommunicationsTelecommunications in Brazil and the consolidated profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes is as follows:

 

   2015   2014   2013 

Profit (loss) before taxes

      

Telecommunications in Brazil

   (5,306,288   (145,580   681,033  

Other businesses (i)

   (18,682   209,867    

Consolidated income before taxes

   (5,324,970   64,287     681,033  

(i)In 2014 the Africa and Timor business were consolidated after May 1.
   2019  2018  2017 

Profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

    

Telecommunications in Brazil

   (2,863,923  (5,185,363  (2,291,162

Other businesses

   (113,447  (82,895  (69,866

Income before financial income (expenses) and taxes (Note 5)

   (2,977,370)   (5,268,258)   (2,361,028) 

Total assets, liabilities and property, plant and equipmenttangible and intangible assets per geographic market as at December 31, 2015 and 20142019 are as follows:

 

  2015   2019 
Total
assets
   Total
liabilities
   Property,
plant and
equipment
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Capital
expenditures
on property,
plant and
equipment and
intangible
assets
   Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Tangible
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Investment in
tangible and
intangible assets
 

Brazil

     91,648,303     81,943,161     25,817,821     11,780,136     3,565,454     67,294,245    53,525,978    38,910,834    3,997,865    7,396,983 

Other, primarily Africa

   7,686,298     745,000     466,049     943,534     116,030     4,597,577    569,338    84,122    21,327    28,530 

 

   2014 
  Total
assets
   Total
liabilities
   Property,
plant and
equipment
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Capital
expenditures
on property,
plant and
equipment and
intangible
assets
 

Brazil

   103,098,596     82,736,984     26,244,309     13,553,821     5,259,714  

Other, primarily Africa

   7,642,738     851,273     506,347     997,015     110,637  

No single customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated revenue.

   2018 
   Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Tangible
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Investment in
tangible and
intangible assets
 

Brazil

   60,514,610    42,015,116    28,425,563    6,948,446    5,211,774 

Other, primarily Africa

   4,923,187    526,870    108,768    47,601    34,467 

 

25.RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

29.

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with joint venture,jointly controlled entities, associates, and unconsolidated entities

 

   2015   2014 

Accounts receivable and other assets

   4,916     191,159  

PT-ACS

     15,114  

Fundação PT

     7,387  

Sportinvest Multimédia

     105,492  

Siresp

     40  

Fibroglobal

     48,134  

Yunit

     7,454  

Contax

     3,307  

Other entities

   4,916     4,231  
   2015   2014 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   53,246     68,259  

PT-ACS

     599  

Fundação PT

     2  

Sportinvest Multimédia

     291  

Siresp

     6  

Fibroglobal

     9,564  

Yunit

     669  

Contax

     41,832  

TODO

     5,587  

Ability

     7  

Veotex

     345  

Hispamar

   52,425     9,357  

Other entities

   821    
   2015   2014 

Revenue

    

Revenue from services rendered

   67     31,873  

Contax

     30,754  

TODO

     1,026  

Other entities

   67     93  
   2015   2014 

Costs/expenses

    

Operating costs and expenses

   (240,511   (232,176

PT-ACS

     (3,887

Sportinvest Multimédia

     (669

Fibroglobal

     (10,974

Veotex

     (10,221

TODO

     (22,984

Hispamar

   (207,366   (152,041

Other entities

   (33,145   (31,400
   2019  2018 

Accounts receivable and other assets

   7,216   6,359 

Hispamar

   426  

Other entities

   6,790   6,359 
   
   2019  2018 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   74,254   74,210 

Hispamar

   71,841   66,704 

Other entities

   2,413   7,506 
   
   2019  2018 

Revenue

   

Revenue from services rendered

   380   347 

Other entities

   380   347 

Other income

   502  

Hispamar

   502  

Financial income

   430   430 

Other entities

   430   430 
  
   2019  2018 

Costs/expenses

   

Operating costs and expenses

   (226,031)   (236,087) 

Hispamar

   (203,426  (207,271

Other entities

   (22,605  (28,816

Financial expenses

   (257)   (167) 

Hispamar

   (245  (158

Other entities

   (12  (9

Compensation of key management personnel

As at December 31, 2019, the compensation of the officers responsible for the planning, management and control of the Company’s activities, including the compensation of the directors and executive officers, totaled R$63,405 (R$81,244 in 2018).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

30.

INSURANCE

During the concession period, the concessionary has the obligation of maintaining the following insurance coverage, over the prescribed terms: “all risks” policy that covers property damages for all insurable assets belonging to the concession, insurance and against economic losses to insure the continuity of services. All material and/or high-risk assets and liabilities in are insured. The balancesCompany and transactionsits subsidiaries maintain insurance coverage against property damages, loss of revenue arising from such damages, etc. Management understands that the amount insured is sufficient to assure the integrity of assets and the continuity of operations, and the compliance with joint venture, associates, and unconsolidated entities result from business transactions carriedthe rules set out in the normal course of operations, namely the provision of telecommunications services by the Company to these entities and the acquisition of these entities’ contents and the rent of their infrastructure.

Compensation of key management personnelConcession Agreements.

The compensationinsurance policies provide the following coverage, per risk and type of the officers responsible for planning, managing and controlling the Company’s activities, i.e., directors and executive officers, totaled R$25,441 (R$25,409 at December 31, 2014) in the Company and R$25,649 (R$25,565 December 31, 2014) on a consolidated basis.asset:

   2019   2018 

Insurance line

    

Operational risks and loss of profits

   800,000    700,000 

Civil liability—third parties (*)

   322,408    309,984 

Fire—inventories

   170,000    150,000 

Theft—inventories

   20,000    20,000 

Civil liability—general

   30,000    20,000 

Civil liability—vehicles

   2,000    2,000 

 

26.(*)HELD-FOR-SALE ASSETS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Based on the foreign exchange rate prevailing at December 31, 2019 (ptax): R$4.0301 = US$1.00

Sale of PT Portugal shares to Altice

On December 9, 2014, the Company and Altice entered into a purchase and sale agreement of all PT Portugal shares to Altice, basically involving the operations conducted by PT Portugal in Portugal and in Hungary.

On January 22, 2015, Pharol shareholders approved the sale by Oi of all PT Portugal shares to Altice, under the terms and conditions of the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement. Accordingly, the suspensive condition provided for in said agreement to its effectiveness was implemented.

On June 2, 2015, the sale by Oi to Altice of its entire stake in PT Portugal was completed. Altice Portugal paid a total of €5,789 million for PT Portugal, of which €4,920 million were received in cash by Oi and €869 million were immediately allocated to settle PT Portugal euro-denominated debt. There is also a provision for the payment of an earn-out of €500 million related to PT Portugal’s future generation of revenue and Oi provided a set of guarantees and representations usual in this type of agreements to the buyer.

Classification of the investment sales transactions as discontinued operations

On May 5, 2014, the Company acquired PT Portugal and since then it also fully consolidated its profits or losses, assets and liabilities. In December 2014, with the approval of the sale of the investments in PT Portugal to Altice, the Company classified its operations in Portugal as held-for-sale assets and liabilities, and discontinued operations.

With the sale of PT Portugal shares to Altice, the loss on divesture is presented as discontinued operations in a single line of the income statement, as follows:

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2015   2014 

Allowance for impairment loss at fair value of the PT Portugal investment and divesture-related expenses

     (3,836,388

Loss on sale of PT Portugal and divesture-related expenses (i)

   (625,464  

Comprehensive income transferred to the income statement (ii)

   (225,934  

Loss for the period of discontinued operations (iii)

   (15,741   (250,061

Profit for the period from discontinued operations (iv)

   (867,139   (4,086,449

 

(i)31.The loss on

HELD-FOR-SALE ASSETS

   2019   2018 

Assets

    

Operations in Africa (a)

   4,271,348    4,923,187 

Nonstrategic assets (b)

   119,742   

Total

   4,391,090    4,923,187 
  
   2019   2018 

Liabilities

    

Operations in Africa (a)

   491,225    526,870 

Nonstrategic liabilities (b)

   3,070   

Total

   494,295    526,870 

(a)

Operations in Africa—Approval of preparatory actions for the sale of PT Portugal includes: (1) the derecognized investment cost that includes goodwill arising on the business combination between the Company and PT less the R$3.8 billion allowance for loss recognized in December 2014, and selling expenses totaling R$1.3 billion; and (2) the R$0.7 billion revenue related to cash proceeds received directly by the Company. The final price is subject to possible post-closing adjustments to be determined in the following months based on changes in the cash, debt, and working capital positions at the closing date.Africatel

(ii)Refers to the cumulative foreign exchange differences gains totaling R$0.5 billion and actuarial losses from pensions and postretirement benefits plans totaling R$0.7 billion recognized in other comprehensive income, transferred from equity to profit or loss for the year due to divesture.
(iii)Refers to PT Portugal’s loss recognized as equity in profits of subsidiaries for 2015 and 2014.
(iv)The profit or loss from discontinued operations includes the effect of taxes amounting to R$327,115 (R$92,545 in 2014).

Approval of preparatory actions for the sale of Africatel

At the Board of Directors’ meeting held on September 16, 2014, Oi’s management was authorized to take all the necessary actions to divest Oi’s stake in Africatel, representing at the time 75% of Africatel’s share capital, and/or dispose of its assets. Oi will lead

With regard specifically to the sale process, even though we believe that it would beindirect interest held by Africatel in Company, on February 27, 2019 the best interests of both Africatel shareholders to maximize the value of their investments, that this sale be coordinated with Samba Luxco, a Helios Investors L.P. affiliate that holds the remaining 25% of Africatel’s share capital. Oi is committed to working with its local partners and each oneCompany was notified of the operating companies wherefinal decision issued by the Arbitration Court under the arbitration proceeding filed by PT Ventures, an Africatel holds investmentssubsidiary, against the other Unitel’s shareholders. The Arbitration Court judged that the other Unitel shareholders had violated several provisions of Unitel’s Shareholders’ Agreement, which resulted in a significant decrease of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel. The Court also judged that the other Unitel shareholders failed to ensure, a coordinated transitionafter November 2012, that PT Ventures received the same amount of its interests in these companies.

Notwithstanding the above, our indirect subsidiary Africatel GmbH & Co. KG (“Africatel GmbH”), direct holder of the Oi’s investment in Africatel, received on September 16, 2014 a letter from Samba Luxco, where Samba Luxco exercised an alleged right to sell the shares it holds in Africatel (put option), pursuant to Africatel’s shareholders’ agreement. According to this letter, this put option results from the indirect transfer of Africatel shares, previously indirectly held by Pharol, to the Companyforeign currency-denominated dividends as the payment for the capital increase made in May 2014. In the letter, Samba Luxco purported to exercise the alleged put rightother foreign Unitel shareholder.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and thereby require Africatel GmbH to acquire its shares in Africatel.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

As a result, the Court ordered the other shareholders to pay PT Ventures, jointly and severally, (i) US$339.4 million plus interest (accrued as from February 20, 2019, using the12-month US dollar LIBOR plus two percentage points, with annual compounding), corresponding to the loss of value of PT Ventures’ stake, in addition to (ii) US$307 million plus interest (simple interest of 7% accrued as from different dates when the dividends not received should have been paid to PT Ventures), in damages resulting from the fact that the other Unitel shareholders failed to ensure, after November 2012, that PT Ventures received the same amount of dividends, in foreign currency, as the other foreign Unitel shareholder, plus (iii) the reimbursement of a significant portions of the fees, court costs, and administrative and arbiters fees and expenses, incurred by PT Ventures on the arbitral proceeding, in a net amount in excess of US$13 million. The Court dismissed all the retrial petitions filed by the other Unitel shareholders (“2019 Arbitration Award”).

The Arbitration Award results in a reaffirmation of PT Ventures’ rights as shareholder of 25% Unitel’s capital, as prescribed by the Shareholders’ Agreement. PT Ventures retains all its rights provided for in the Shareholders’ Agreement, including the right to appoint the majority of Unitel’s Board of Directors’ members and the right to receive Unitel’s past and future dividends.

Subsequently, at the General Shareholders’ Meeting of Unitel held on March 19, 2019 a new Board of Directors was elected consisting of five members, including two appointed by PT Ventures, one of whom will hold the position of Unitel’s General Director.

On August 12, 2019, PT Ventures was notified on the arbitration petition filed with the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) by Vidatel Ltd. (“Vidatel”), on of Unitel’s shareholders against PT Ventures. In its petition, Vidatel seeks to challenge the 2019 Arbitration Award by submitting arguments relating to the recognition, effectiveness, and feasibility of said award and arguing that the Arbitration Award would have the effect of leading to the unjust enrichment of PT Ventures.

The Company believes that there wasthe arbitration proceeding initiated by Vidatel has a delaying tactic with the single goal of disrupting the enforcement of the 2019 Arbitration Award by reopening the discussion of matters that have already been discussed in the arbitration proceeding filed by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders and terminated in February 2019.

Additionally, the Company believes that the ICC is not any action or eventthe appropriate forum to file an arbitration proceeding and analyze the problems alleged by Vidatel, not only because national courts have exclusive jurisdiction on these matters and also because these matters are not within the scope of the arbitration clause greed by Unitel’s shareholders, which prescribes that under Africatel’sarbitration shall be used to settle disputes relating only to Unitel’s shareholders’ agreement terms, would trigger the right to exercise the put option. Accordingly, without prejudiceand violations of Unitel’s shareholders’ agreement.

PT Ventures filed its response to the valuearbitration petition on September 11, 2019.

As disclosed to the market in a Material Fact Notice on January 24, 2020, on that date Africatel sold and transferred all PT Ventures shares to the Angolan company Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública—Sonangol E.P. (Note 33). As a result of this operation, the Company attributesis no longer bound by the ongoing litigation involving PT Ventures, Unitel, and Unitel’s other shareholders.

With regard to maintaining the indirect stake held by Africatel in Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A. (“CVT”), on May 21, 2019, PT Ventures sold, after the compliance with the conditions precedent, and transferred all the shares it held in CVT, representing 40% of CVT’s share capital, to the National Social Security Institute and state-owned company ASA – Empresa Nacional de Aeroportos e Segurança relationshipAérea, S.A., both in Cabo Verde, for the total amount of mutual respectUS$26.3 million, as provided for in Clauses 3.1.3 and 5.1 of the JRP. This sale generated a net gain of R$67 million, recognized in profit or loss.

As a result of said share sale, PT Ventures entered into with Samba Luxco, Africatel GmbH intends to challenge the exerciseState of this put optionCabo Verde, on the same date, an agreement for the definite termination of the arbitration proceedings filed by Samba LuxcoPT Ventures against the latter in the current circumstances, which, pursuant to Africatel’s shareholders’ agreement, which was duly notified in Africatel GmbH’s reply to Samba Luxco’s letter, on September 26, 2014.

On November 12, 2014,March 2015, with the International CourtCentre fore for Settlement of Arbitration ofInvestment Disputes (“ICSID”) and the International Chamber of Commerce notified Africatel GmbH that Samba Luxco had commenced arbitral proceedings against Africatel GmbH(“ICC”).

Oi S.A. –Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to enforce its purported put right or, in the alternative, certain ancillary rights and claims. Africatel GmbH presented its answer to Samba Luxco’s request for arbitration on December 15, 2014. The arbitral tribunal was constituted on March 12, 2015 and held a first management conference in London on May 8, 2015.Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 22, 2015, Samba Luxco submitted its Statement(In thousands of Claim, and on October 9, 2015, Pharol and Africatel GmbH submitted their Statement of Defence. On January 25, 2016, Samba Luxco submitted its Reply and, on March 14, 2016, Pharol and Africatel GmbH submitted their Rejoinder.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The proceedings have been bifurcated, with the merits hearing currently scheduled to take place during November 2016. Dates for a quantum hearing (if necessary) have been reserved in March 2017.

With regard to Africatel’s indirect stake in Unitel, through its subsidiary PT Ventures, it is worth noting that on October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiate the arbitration proceeding against Unitel’s shareholders as a resultgroup of the violation by the latter of several rules of Unitel’s shareholders’ agreement and the Angolan law, including the fact that such shareholders caused Unitel not to pay the dividends paid to PT Ventures and retain the information and clarifications on such payment. Additionally, on October 20, 2015, PT Ventures filed an action for a declaration of sentence against Unitel with an Angolan court, claiming the recognition of PT Ventures’ right to receive the outstanding dividends declared in 2010, and the dividends for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013.

The other shareholders of Unitel have asserted to PT Ventures that they believe that Pharol’s sale of anon-controlling interest in Africatel to Samba Luxco in 2007 constituted a breach the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. PT Ventures disputes this interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement and believes that such provisions apply only to a transfer of Unitel shares by PT Ventures itself. By the date of this report, the Company had not been notified of any proceedings initiated with respect to Pharol’s sale of anon-controlling stake in Africatel to Samba Luxco.

The assets and liabilities of the African operations are stated at the lower of their carrying amounts and their fair values less costs to sell.

The African operationssell, and are consolidated in the incomeCompany’s statement of profit or loss since May 5, 2014.

The main components of the assets for held sale and liabilities associated to assets held for sale of the African operations are as follows:

   Operations in Africa 
   2019(1)   2018 

Held-for-sale assets

   4,271,348    4,923,187 

Cash, cash equivalents and cash investments

   63,993    82,639 

Accounts receivable

   113,699    108,343 

Dividends receivable (i)

   2,435,014    2,566,935 

Held-for-sale asset (i)

   1,474,699    1,843,778 

Other assets

   74,300    145,709 

Investments

   4,916    19,414 

Property, plant and equipment

   83,400    108,768 

Intangible assets

   21,327    47,601 

Liabilities directly associated to assets held for sale

   491,225    526,870 

Borrowings and financing

   11,589    188 

Trade payables

   37,119    52,064 

Other liabilities

   442,517    474,618 

Non-controlling interests (ii)

   146,180    243,491 

Total held-for-sale assets, net of the corresponding liabilities

   3,633,943    4,152,826 

(1)

Thenon-operating companies started to consolidated in the balance sheet beginning December 31, 2019, whose assets and liabilities total R$326,229 and R$78,113, respectively (see Note 1 – Company subsidiaries).

(i)

Represents the indirect interest held by PT Ventures in the dividends receivable and the fair value of the financial investment in Unitel, both classified as held for sale. The assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measure substantially at the fair value of the investment for sale, which occurred on January 23, 2020, as referred to above, in Note 33;

(ii)

Represented mainly by the Samba Luxco’s 14% stake in Africatel and, consequently, in its net assets.

(b)

Nonstrategic assets

The Company disclosed to the general market, through a material fact notice, its Strategic Plan, approved by the Board of Directors, focusing on the improvement of the operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model, for the purpose of maximizing the Company’s value, in the context of the judicial reorganization proceeding. The plan prescribes that part of the financing of the investment strategy will be ensured by selling of the Company’s nonstrategic assets. These assets consist basically of: (i) Investment in Unitel, (ii) Towers; (iii) Datacenter; (iv) Properties; and (v) other nonstrategic assets. The Company is engaged in and focused on promoting the sale of said assets and will take all the necessary actions to implement said Plan in the coming periods.

In December 2019, the assets and liabilities associated with Real Estate and mobile Towers were stated inheld-for-sale assets, in line with the Company’s strategic plan and intention. Management assessed and determined that the other nonstrategic assets do not substantially meet the presentation and measurement requirements set forth by IFRS 5,Held-for-Sale Noncurrent Assets and Discontinued Operations, and therefore continue to be stated in the group ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ (Note 16).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Operations in
Africa
2015

Held-for-sale assets

7,686,298

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

214,413

Accounts receivable

217,992

Dividends receivable (i)

2,042,191

Available-for-sale financial asset (ii)

3,541,314

Other assets

230,318

Investments

61,425

Property, plant and equipment

466,049

Intangible assets

356,900

Goodwill (iii)

555,696

Liabilities directly associated to assets held for sale

745,000

Borrowings and financing

9,557

Trade payables

85,730

Provisions for pension plans

923

Other liabilities

648,790

Non-controlling interests (*)

1,190,547
32.

Total assets held for sale and liabilities associated to assets held for sale

5,750,751

(*)Represented mainly by the Samba Luxco’s 25% stake in Africatel Holdings, BV and, consequently, in its net assets.

   PT Portugal
operations
   African
operations
   Total 
  2014 

Held-for-sale assets

   26,611,944     7,642,738     34,254,682  

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

   590,111     170,056     760,167  

Accounts receivable

   2,270,140     195,690     2,465,830  

Dividends receivable (i)

   1,948     1,261,826     1,263,774  

Available-for-sale financial asset (ii)

     4,284,416     4,284,416  

Other assets

   1,085,751     164,121     1,249,872  

Investments

   134,272     63,267     197,539  

Property, plant and equipment

   10,560,140     506,347     11,066,487  

Intangible assets

   5,271,808     376,441     5,648,249  

Goodwill

   6,697,774     620,574     7,318,348  

Liabilities directly associated to assets held for sale

   26,326,949     851,273     27,178,222  

Borrowings and financing

   18,892,793     83,843     18,976,636  

Trade payables

   2,260,503     97,600     2,358,103  

Provisions for pension plans

   3,347,667     997     3,348,664  

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Other liabilities

   1,825,986     668,833     2,494,819  

Non-controlling interests

     1,509,197     1,509,197  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets held for sale and liabilities associated to assets held for sale

   284,995     5,282,268     5,567,263  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(i)Refers to dividends receivable from Unitel. In 2015, the Company’s recognized dividends not yet received based on the expected recoverable amount and took into account, for this valuation, the existence of lawsuits filed to collect these amounts, the expected favorable decisions on these lawsuits, and the existence of cash at Unitel for the payment of these dividends. The dividends not paid by Unitel to PT Ventures refer to fiscal years 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, totaling US$661million;
(ii)Refers mainly to the fair value of the indirect interest financial investment of 18.75% of Unitel’s share capital, classified as held for sale. The fair value of this investment at the date of acquisition was estimated based on the valuation made by Banco Santander (Brasil), which used a series of estimates and assumptions, including cash flows forecasts for a four-year period, the choice of a growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of appropriate discount rates. The Company has the policy of monitoring and periodically updating the main assumptions and material estimates used in the fair value measurement, and also takes into consideration in this assessment possible impacts of actual events related to the investment, notably the lawsuits filed against Unitel and its shareholders in 2015. As at December 31, 2015 and in the context of the updating of assumptions referred to above, the Company determined a fair value of the investment in Unitel of R$3,436 million and recognized in profit or loss a loss of R$408 million. The Company believes that the fair value measured under the Discounted Cash Flows method and using the discount rate assumptions (from 15.5% to 17.5%), foreign exchange rates, and other Angolan official financial indicators, corresponds to the best estimate of the realizable value of the investment in Unitel.
(iii)As at December 31, 2015, the Company conducted the annual impairment test of its assets related to the operations in África and recognized a loss on goodwill amounting to R$89,176.

27.OTHER INFORMATION

 

(a)

Agreements entered into by the Company, TmarPart, and Pharol related to the cash investments made in Rio Forte securitiescommercial papers

On June 30, 2014, the Company was informed, through a market notice disclosed by Pharol, of the investment made by PT International Finance BV (“PTIF”)PTIF and PT Portugal (both, collectively, “Oi Subsidiaries”), companies contributed by Pharol to Oi in the Company’s capital increase in May 2014, in a commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A. (“Securities” and “Rio Forte”, respectively), a company part of the Portuguese group Espírito Santo (“GES”), when both PTIF and PT Portugal were Pharol subsidiaries.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes toIn light of the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousandsdefault of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

According to said notice, the Securities had been issued in the total amount of €897 million, and bore average annual interest of 3.6% and matured on July 15 and July 17, 2014 (€847 and €50 million, respectively), stressing that since April 28, 2014 no other investment and/or renewal of this type of investments had been made.

Both PT Portugal and PTIF (collectively “Oi Subsidiaries”) became Company subsidiaries due to the assignment of all PT Portugal shares to the Company by Pharol, on May 5, 2014, to pay in the Company’s capital increase approved on April 28 and 30, 2014.

The Securities matures in July 2014 and subsequently the cure period for payment of the securities ended without Rio Forte, paying the amount due. The Luxembourg Commercial Court denied Rio Forte’s request for controlled management on October 17, 2014 and Rio Forte’s bankruptcy was declared on December 8, 2014.

Agreements entered into by the Company, TmarPart, and Pharol related to the investments made in Rio Forte commercial papers

On September 8, 2014, after obtaining the dueproper corporate approvals, the Company, the Oi Subsidiaries, TmarPart, and Pharol entered into definitive agreements related to the investments made in the Securities. The agreements provided for (i) an exchange (the “Exchange”) through which Oi Subsidiaries transferredwould transfer the Securities to Pharol in exchange for preferred shares and common shares of the Company held by Pharol, as well as (ii) the assignment by Oi Subsidiaries of a call option on the Company shares to the benefit of PharolPT (“Call Option”).

On March 26, 2015, in order to comply with the conditions presented by the CVM’s Board to grant the waivers necessary for the implementation of the Share Exchange and Call Option, according to the decision issued on March 4, 2015, the Company held a Shareholders’ Meeting which approved the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange and Call Option agreements.

On March 31, 2015, the Company announced,published a Material Fact Notice on the consummationcompletion of the Exchange, under which Pharol delivered to the Oi Subsidiaries Oi unencumbered shares corresponding to 47,434,872 OIBR3 (common shares) and 94,869,744 OIBR4 (preferred shares) (“Exchanged Shares”); and in exchange Oi, through PTIF, delivered the Securities to Pharol, totaling €897 million, with no cash involved.Exchange.

With implementation of the Exchange, PharolThe Option became the holder of the Securities and the sole responsible for negotiating with Rio Forte and the decisions related to the Securities, and the Company is responsible for the supporting documentation to Pharol to take the necessary actions to collect the receivables represented by the Securities.

As a result of the consummation of the Exchange, Pharol’s direct interest in Oi decreased from 104,580,393 common shares and 172,025,273 preferred shares, representing 37.66% of the voting capital (ex-treasury) and 32.82% of the total capital of Oi (ex-treasury) to 57,145,521 common shares and 77,155,529 preferred shares, representing 24.81% of the voting capital (ex-treasury) and 19.17% of the total capital of Oi (ex-treasury). Oi shares received by PTIF as a result of the Exchange will remain in treasury.

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Main terms of the Call Option for the Purchase of Shares (“Option Contract”)

Under the Call Option Agreement entered into on September 8, 2014 by Pharol, PTIF, PT Portugal, Oi, and TmarPart, and amended on March 31, 2015, the call option on Oi shares granted Pharol became exercisablevested with the consummationcompletion of the Exchange, beginning March 31, 2015, exercisable at any time, duringover asix-year period.

Under period, and the termsnumber of shares covered by the Call Option Agreement, the Call Option will involve 47,434,872 Oi common shares and 94,869,744 Oi preferred shares (“Shares Subjectbe decreased at each March 31st.

Up to March 31, 2020, Pharol had not exercised the Option”) and can be exercised,Option, in whole or in part, at any time, pursuant to the following terms and conditions:

(i) Term: six (6) years, noting that Pharol’s right to exercise the Option on the Shares Subject to the Option will be reducedOption. Accordingly, the following are no longer subject to the Option: (i) beginning March 31, 2016, 4,743,487 common shares and 9,486,974 preferred shares issued by the percentages below:

Date of Reduction

% of Shares Subject to the Option that cease to the
subject to the Option each year

As from 03/31/2016

10

As from 03/31/2017

18

As from 03/31/2018

18

As from 03/31/2019

18

As from 03/31/2020

18

As from 03/31/2021

18

(ii) Exercise Price: R$1.8529 per Company, preferred share and R$2.0104 per Company common share, before the reverse share split approved on November 18, 2014, as adjusted by the interbank deposit rate (CDI), plus 1.5% per annum, calculated on a pro rata temporis basis, from the date of the Exchangeequivalent to the date of the effective payment of each exercise price, in whole or in part, of the Option. The exercise price of the shares will be paid in cash, at the transfer date10% of the Shares Subject to the Option.

Oi is not requiredOption; (ii) beginning March 31, 2017, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554, equivalent to maintain the Exchanged Shares in treasury. In the event that PTIF or any of Oi’s subsidiaries do not hold, in treasury, a sufficient number of Shares Subject to the Option to transfer to Pharol, the Option may be financially settled through payment by the Oi Subsidiaries of the amount corresponding to the difference between the market price18% of the Shares Subject to the Option and the respective exercise price corresponding to these shares.

While the Option is effective, Pharol may not purchase Oi shares, directly or indirectly, in any manner other than by exercising the Option. Pharol may not transfer or assign the Option, nor grant any rights under the Option, including security, without the consent of Oi. If Pharol issues, directly or indirectly, derivatives that are backed by or referenced to Oi shares, it shall immediately use the proceeds derived from such a derivative transaction, directly or indirectly, to acquire the Shares Subject to the Option.

Oi may terminate the Option if (i) the Bylaws of Pharol are amended voluntarily to remove or amend the provision that limits the voting right to 10% of all votes corresponding to the capital stock of Pharol; (ii) Pharol directly or indirectly engages in activities that compete with the

Oi S.A. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

activities of Oi or its subsidiaries in the countries in which they operate;Option; (iii) Pharol violates certain obligations under the Option Contract.

Onbeginning March 31, 2015, the Option Agreement was amended2018, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares equivalent to provide for (i) the possibility of Pharol assigning or transferring the Call Option, regardless of previous consent by Oi, provided that such assignment or transfer covers at least 1418% of the Shares Subject to the Option; (iv) beginning March 31, 2019, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares, equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option; and (v) beginning March 31, 2020, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares, equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option. There are also 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares subject to the Option and Pharol can freely use the use the proceeds of such transactions, (ii) the possibility of Pharol, subjectwill no longer be entitled to previous, written consent from Oi, creating or granting any rights arising on the Call Option or, pledging the guarantees supported by the Call Option, and (iii) the grant of a right of first refusal to Oi for the acquisition of the Call Option, should Pharol wish to sell, assign, transfer, contribute the capital of another entity, transmit, or otherwise sell or dispose of the Call Option.

This amendment has been executed with a suspensive condition and would only be effective after an authorization from the CVM to amendexercise the Option Agreement were granted. However, at a meeting held on December 16, 2015, the CVM’s board decided to refuse the entire request filed by the Company for waiver of the requirements of CVM Instructions 10/1980 and 390/2003 to amend the Option Agreement.

These Instructions determine that the acquisition and sale of shares of a publicly held company must be conducted in a stock exchange and that the stock options transactions of a publicly held company must be conducted in the markets where the company’s shares are traded, and interdicts any private transactions. The waiver of these requirements would allow the enforcement of the provisions of the amendment to the Call Option Agreement related to (i) the possibility of privately transferring the Call Option from Pharol to Oi; (ii) granting a right of first refusal to Oi to acquire the Call Option; and (iii) the possibility of making the payment of the Option acquisition price in Oi shares, if the right of first refusal if exercised.them on March 31, 2021.

As at December 31, 2015,2019, the fair value of the Call Option is estimated at R$4117 million calculated by the Company using theBlack-Scholes model and theoretical share volatility assumptions, using the Revenue Approach valuation technique.technique laid down by paragraphs B10 and B11 of IFRS 13—Fair Value Measurement.

 

(b)Consolidation of

Punitive Administrative Proceedings at the telecommunications industry in the Brazilian marketCVM

On August 26, 2014, Oi entered into an agreement with Banco BTG Pactual S.A. (“BTG Pactual”) under whichIn December 2018, we became aware that the latter will act as commissioner to develop feasible alternatives to render viable participatingCVM, in the industry consolidationexercise of its duties, initiated two punitive administrative proceedings for acts conducted in connection with the Brazilian telecommunications market. As already reportedcorporate restructuring announced in October 2013 involving Oi and Pharol (former Portugal Telecom), and the capital increase through the public offer of Oi shares concluded in May 2014, for an alleged breach of the Corporate Law, to hold liable certain executives, officers and controlling shareholders at the time of the events.

The Company is not a party to these proceedings. With regard to the market, BTG Pactualindicted executives, if they are held discussions with third parties regardingliable in these Punitive Administrative Proceedings, they will be subject to a possible transaction and the role of BTG Pactual includes contracting other market players that could be interested in the transaction, as Company agent for the transaction.

On October 23, 2015, the company receivedpenalty, which may range from LetterOne Technology (UK) LLP, onea warning to a temporary disqualification, during up to 20 years, to hold a management or member of the companies insupervisory board position of a publicly-held company, entity of the Letter One investment group (“L1 Technology”), a letter containing an exclusivity proposal in a potential transaction for the specific purposesecurities distribution system, or other entities that depend of allowing a consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications industry involving a potential business combination with TIM Participações S.A. (“TIM Participações”). Under the proposal, L1 Technology would be willing toCVM authorization or registration.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

make a capital contribution of up to US$4.0 billion to the Company, contingent to the consolidation transaction.

After assessing the proposal, the Company sent to counter-proposal to L1 Technology on October 28, de 2015, under which Oi and L1 Technology would mutually grant each other an exclusivity right over a seven-month periods, starting on October 23, 2015, especially regarding business combinations involving telecommunications companies or telecommunications assets in Brazil. Since L1 Technology accepted the terms of the counterproposal, Oi and L1 Technology are now bound by the exclusivity agreement during the seven-period starting October 23, 2015.

If the transaction under construction materializes, it is expected a decrease in Oi’s leverage to become a more robust player, and the generation of major synergies and gains of scale, promoting the creation of value for all shareholders. A potential union of Oi with TIM Participações should result in the incorporation of a more complete, better-positioned operator, capable of competing with global players already operating in Brazil. Consumers should benefit from this trend, consequently strengthening the Company.

On February 25, 2016, Oi disclosed a Material Fact Notice where it informed that it has been notified by L1 Technology that L1 Technology had disclosed a notice stating that it had been informed by TIM that the latter was no longer interested in proceeding with the negotiations on the possibility of a business combination with Oi in Brazil. L1 Technology informed that without TIM’s involvement it could not proceed with transaction as previously planned. In light of this information, Oi will assess the impacts of this notice on the possibilities of consolidation in the Brazilian market.

 

(c)Completion of the share auction

Operation:Mapa da Mina

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched the 69th phase Operation:Lava Jato (Car Wash), named “Operation:Mapa da Mina” (Mine Plan) (Criminal Search and Seizure Order No.5024872-64,2018.4.04.7000/PR—13th Federal Criminal Court of Curitiba), one of the main targets of which was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The last auctioninvestigation, which has neither the Company nor any of its current officers as defendants, is based on a suspected transfer of several companies to sell the shares resultingGamecorp and Grupo Gol, in exchange for alleged benefits from the reverse split of share fractions approved by the shareholders at Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on November 18, 2014 was held on June 30, 2015.

Federal Government. As a result of such investigation, Company buildings in the three auctions held, 1,069,131States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, and in Brasília were searched and documented were seized. Since then, the Company common shares and 1,162,652 Company preferred shares were sold (“Share”), representinghas cooperated with the investigations by making all the shares resultingclarifications and delivering all the documents requested. On March 12, 2020, the 4th Region Federal Court granted an habeas corpus (Habeas Corpus No.5052647-8.2019.4.04.000/PR) was granted, requiring that the records of said Operation be sent to the São Paulo Judiciary Section, after concluding that there was no connection between the facts reported in the investigation and those verified in Operation: “Lava Jato”. Internally, the Company informs that since 2015 it has retained the law firm Tozzini Freire Advogados as external independent auditor to conduct a forensic investigation addressing all the allegations in the case file, which has updated these analyses due in light to the new facts pointed out in Operation: “Mapa da Mina”. Such investigations were completed without evidence of illegal actions committed by Company representatives.

Among the initiatives undertaken, the Company has created a Multidisciplinary Committee consisting of members from different departments, such as the legal, compliance, internal audit and accounting department, to determine the main procedures to be performed, and set a schedule of relevant activities in response to the allegations of said investigation involving the Company and its subsidiaries. In this regard, the Multidisciplinary Committee determined the following procedures: (i) retain a renowned, specialized law firm, independent from the reverse split of share fractions.

The net proceedsCompany and its subsidiaries, to conduct an internal investigation on the allegations made in the Federal Public Prosecution Office (MPF) and the Brazilian Federal Police (PF) investigations; (ii) request an assessment by the outside legal counsel of the saleresults of said internal investigation to be conducted by the specialized law firm, if applicable; (iii) request an assessment by the outside legal counsel of possible legal and regulatory impacts in Brazil and in the United States, regarding all allegations made in the investigation, considering the applicable anticorruption legislation and/or illegal activities; (iv) request an assessment by the compliance department to determine whether any material weaknesses in the internal control environment existing at the time covered by the investigations still persist in the current Company governance and internal control scenario; (v) conduct periodic meetings to follow up on the status of the Shares totaled R$13,632assessments to be carried out; and were deposited on July 10, 2015 on behalf(vi) submit of the share fraction holders, proportionatelyresults of all assessments to be carried out to the numbermembers of shares held.

(d)New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listing Rule

the Audit, Risk and Controls Committee (“CARC”), which reports to the Company’s Board of Directors. In September 2015,this context, the specialized law firm concluded its internal independent investigation in February 2020. Based on interviews, information and documentation submitted by the Company’s management, and due to the constraints imposed by the time period covered by said investigation (2003-2019), no indications of illegalities committed by the Company was notifiedwere identified linked to the allegations made by the NYSE that OiMPF and the PF in Operation: “Mapa da Mina” investigation. This internal use report was not complying withextensively discussed and presented to the continued listing rule, which requires that the average closing pricemembers of the listed securities of a company cannot go below US$1.00 per share in any consecutive30-day trading period.

On January 22, 2016, in order to comply with the minimum share price requirement established by NYSE, Oi disclosed a NoticeMultidisciplinary Committee, as well as to the Market announcingmembers of the change in Company’s common sharesCARC.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

33.

EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

ratio

(a)

Sale of investment in PT Ventures

After obtaining the proper approvals by the Company’s Board of Directors, the competent corporate bodies of Africatel and the Judicial Reorganization Court, on January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred all shares issued by PT Ventures to the Angolan company Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública—Sonangol E.P., as provided for in the Company’s Judicial Reorganization Plan and Strategic Plan (Note 31 (b)).

On the transaction date, PT Ventures held stakes in the Angolan companies Unitel (25%) and Multitel—Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda. (40%), as well as credit rights of dividends declared by Unitel and already past due and a set of rights resulting from the final decision rendered by the Arbitration Court installed under the Arbitration Rules of the Depositary Receipts Program, Level II, SponsoredInternational Chamber of Commerce (“Common DR”ICC”) so that each Common DR,, within the scope of the arbitration initiated by PT Ventures at the ICC against the other Unitel shareholders, as disclosed by the Company in a Material Fact Notice on February 28, 2019.

The total amount of the transaction was US$1 billion, of which (i) US$699.1 million was previously one (1) common share, represents five (5) common sharespaid to Africatel by Sonangol on January 24, 2020; (ii) Africatel was paid US$60.9 million prior to the transfer of PT Ventures’ shares; and (iii) US$240 million, fully guaranteed by a guarantee letter issued by a prime bank, will be paid unconditionally by Sonangol to Africatel until July 31, 2020, with a minimum monthly flow of US$40 million assured to Africatel as from February 1, 2016.2020. The Company reiterates that the contractually assured flow was duly met in February and March 2020 by Sonangol.

As at December 31, 2019, the assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially at the fair value of the investment for sale.

 

28.(b)SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Commitment to sell a property

OptimizationAs disclosed to the market on January 30, 2020 and February 26, 2020, the Company sold a property it owned, located at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, in the city of Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda., for the amount of R$120.5 million, on February 21, 2020, as part of its project to sell noncore assets, as set forth by the Company’s Judicial Reorganization Plan and Strategic Plan (Note 31 (b)).

The operation was authorized by the Judicial Reorganization Court, after obtaining the favorable opinion of the Rio de Janeiro State Public Prosecution Office and the Judicial Administrator. Likewise, ANATEL confirmed the removal of the Property from the Company’s liquidity and debt profileList of Reversible Assets.

The

(c)

Third-party expressions of interest on the Company’s Mobile business

On March 10, 2020, the Company has retained PJT Partners asdisclosed to the general market in a material fact notice, that its financial advisor, to assist OiBank of America Merrill Lynch (“BofA”) received statements from third parties expressions of interest in evaluating financial and strategic alternatives to optimize its liquidity and debt profile. In addition on April 25, 2016,the Company’s mobile business. To date, however, there is no commitment from the Company announced that itor any of these third parties to proceed with such sale and no binding instrument has been entered into to this respect. Even though there may be future developments in the analysis for a customary non-disclosure agreement with an advisor to a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued bypotential formal negotiation process, the Company and certaincontinues to analyze all the existing alternatives that may bring more efficiency to the implementation of its affiliated companies, as an initial step toward discussions regarding the terms of a potential restructuring.Strategic Plan.

Oi’s operating and business focus remains unchanged and Oi is still committed to continuing to make investments that ensure a continual improvement of its quality of service, which it believes will allow it to continue to bring technological advances to its customers all over Brazil. Oi also continues to undertake efforts for the operating upgrading and transformation of its business by focusing on austerity, infrastructure optimization, process revision, and sales actions.

Debenture holders’ general meeting of the 5th and the 9th Issuance of the Company’s Debentures

On April 15, 2016, general debenture holders’ meetings were held for: (i) the 5th Issue of Unsecured, Nonconvertible Public Debentures (“5th Issue”); and (ii) the 9th Issue of Simple, Unsecured, Nonconvertible Debentures in up to Two Series, for Public Distribution (“9th Issue” and collectively with the 5th Issue, “Debentures”), both issued by the Company (“GDMs” or individually “5th Issue GDM” and “9th Issue GDM”).

Contrarily to the 8th and 10th issues of debentures, where the Company obtained a waiver on the calculation of the leverage ratio, the same waiver was not granted for the Debentures. Since the Company did not comply with this financial ratio for the Debentures, the related fiduciary agents called the GDMs.

With regard to the 5th Issue, the minimum quorum to open the GDM was not reached and the 5th Issue fiduciary agent published, on April 19, 2016, a second call of said meeting for April 27, 2016, which did not reach the minimum quorum either. Pursuant to the debenture indenture, the fiduciary agent declared the accelerated maturity of the outstanding debentures, resulting in the repayment of R$1,519,961.56.

With regard to the 9th Issue, the fiduciary agent declared the accelerated maturity of the outstanding debentures pursuant to Clause 6.23 of the 9th Issue debenture indenture, resulting in the repayment of R$21,518,990.58 at April 20th, 2016.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(d)

Potential Effects ofCOVID-19 Pandemic

Since December 2019, a COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that COVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental “shelter-in-place” and other quarantine measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced social isolation and quarantine measures and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of “non-essential” businesses. In mid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared states of emergency. In accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, the Company transitioned a substantial majority of its employees to work from home.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has no effect on the Company historical results of operations, there are many potential effects of this pandemic on its short- and medium- term business operations and, consequently, its results of operations. In March 2020, the Company established a crisis response team to focus on ensuring the full business continuity of its operations, the health and safety of its employees, and the establishment of a formal process to monitor, analyze and respond to the potential impacts of the pandemic.

As of the date of this annual report, the Company has detected few cases of COVID-19 in its employees and the human resources department monitors suspected or confirmed cases. As one a measure designed to protect its employees, the Company has instituted a “work-from-home” policy for all of its employees for whom the demands of their work permit this arrangement, constituting approximately 84% of its work force, and have been able to do so without any interruption of their activities. For its remaining employees, for example, the Company field service technicians and operators in its call centers, the Company has complied with all health care recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

The Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows the Company to continue its field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic.

Although there has not been sufficient history with the Company operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to provide significant analysis of the potential financial impact of the pandemic or the governmental and popular response to the pandemic, the Company belives that demand for telecommunications services, including services provided by the Company during the pandemic has grown significantly. In order to service this demand and to ensure continuity of its services, the Company moved quickly to activate new circuits in its backbone infrastructure and has not experienced any significant decline in the operation and reliability of its networks.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Company has closed its retail stores and many of its distribution channels for the Company’s mobile service have been unable to operate, although some of its physical points-of-sale, such as grocery stores, pharmacies and convenience stores, have continued to operate. As a result, the Company believes that new activations by mobile customers will be substantially reduced for the quarantine period. However, as these store closures affect all operators in the mobile business equally, the Company expects that there will be substantially reduced levels of churn during this period. In addition, the Company expects that revenue for SIM card recharges will be adversely affected for the quarantine period as the number of points-of-sale that offer these services has been substantially reduced.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Company has curtailed significantly its door-to-door sales channel for residential services, including broadband, but has been able to maintain its telemarketing and teleagent sales channels. The Company has experienced a significant surge in demand for its broadband services, including services delivered through its expanding FTTH network, both from residential and B2B customers as they establish remote work operations. Because its sales channels for these services depend less on physical presence in sales locations than its mobile services, the Company does not expect the reduction in new activations or upgrades in services to be affected to the same degree as in its mobile services.

The Company expects that the public health measures adopted in Brazil will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of its subscribers, particularly low-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, although the Company has not yet been able to gather data to analyze the extent of these impacts. In addition, the Company has begun to experience some delays in payment for its corporate and governmental customers. As a result, the Company expects an increase in late-payments, customer defaults and expected losses on trade receivables. The Company has instituted some measures to assist its customers during the pandemic, for example, providing deferrals of payment deadlines by up to 10 days upon request of its customers and entering into payment plans with some of its customers under which it will forbear the collection of interest and late charges. These measures are likely to have an adverse effect on revenue and operating cash flow during the period over which they are effective, although the Company does not have sufficient experience with the effects of these measures to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures.

The Company continues to monitor the effects of COVID-19 and the public health measures adopted in Brazil on its results of operations and cash flows to assess whether any of its assets have been impaired. As of the date of this annual report, the Company does not have sufficient history with its operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to assess whether any impairment of its assets will be required.

The Company does not expect significant negative effects on its ongoing maintenance activities and FTTH expansion project as a result of the pandemic and the public health measures introduced to combat the pandemic. The Company has experienced some negative effects relating to the deployment of field teams, primarily related to the difficulty of obtaining lodging and meals and, in some instances, the difficulty in arranging transportation between cities, due to the public health restrictions. However, as a result of the determination that the telecom sector is an essential service, the general public health restrictions applicable to the population have not generally applied to the Company staff of field technicians.

The Company continues to have regular communications with its equipment vendors to assess the impacts of the pandemic on their production and inventories to ensure that deliveries of equipment will continue to be made on a timely basis. As of the date of this annual report, the Company has not suffered any negative impacts in its supply chain for equipment and has not been advised that any significant disruptions are expected.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

34.

RECONCILIATION BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The Company prepares its local financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and the pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

As the company is presenting its financial statements under IFRS for SEC reporting purposes after several years of presenting them under US GAAP, it is providing a reconciliation of its 2018 and 2017 US GAAP financial statements to IFRS.

ACCOUNTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Differences between these accounting policies and practices adopted in International Financial Reporting Standard—IFRS, where applicable to Oi, are summarized below:

(a)

Impairment of long-lived assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 360, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the fair value of the asset or group of assets.

Therefore, regarding impairment of long-lived assets there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of impairment under IFRS.

On December 31, 2018, under U.S. GAAP, no impairment losses were recognized and under IFRS an accumulated provision for impairment losses, amounting to R$1,226,125, were recorded in the balance sheet as a result of the difference on the impairment methodology between the two standards.

The net effect on net income, as of December 31, 2018, was R$141,418, which includes the accounting differences related to the provision for impairment recorded under IFRS in amounting to R$291,807 compared no impairment losses recorded under USGAAP, and the effects of depreciation and amortization related to the acumulated effects of no recorded impairment losses under USGAAP, in amounting to R$150,389.

(b)

Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

Under U.S. GAAP, for the acquisitions of interests in Pegasus,Way-TV, Paggo and TNCP (Amazônia) that occurred prior to January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the procedures determined by FASB ASC 805 Business Combinations, resulting in a difference as compared to the Company’s accounting policy in force prior to that date. The accounting method used under U.S. GAAP in business combination transactions is the “purchase method”, which requires that acquirers reasonably determine the fair-value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of acquired companies, individually, to determine goodwill paid.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Since IFRS 3Business Combinations was effective to business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after January 1, 2009, under IFRS for all business combinations prior that, the Company typically recognized the difference between the purchase price and the historical book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as goodwill, which was amortized over the estimated period over which the Company expected to benefit from the goodwill. This period was determined based on the reasons attributed by management for the payment of goodwill. A test for impairment is made at least annually or if there is an indication that the unit in which the goodwill was allocated may be impaired.

Therefore, regarding the business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the computation of goodwill, recognition of intangible assets and amortization of goodwill.

(c)

Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

The Company applies FASB ASC 715—Retirement Benefits, which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded status or funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

The overfunded status of the pension plans is presented as a prepaid asset. Unrecognized net gain or losses are recognized following the “10% corridor approach”. Deferred actuarial gains and losses outside the 10% corridor are amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees or, when all or almost all participants are inactive, over the average remaining life expectancy of those participants.

Under IFRS, if a plan has an overfunded status, which is not expected to generate future benefits, the company does not recognize the funded status, unless in case of express authorization for offsetting with future employer contribution. Remeasurement of gains and losses, including actuarial gains and losses, must be recognized immediately in OCI and are not subsequently recognized (or recycled) into net income.

Therefore, regarding pension plans and other post-retirement benefits there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely: (i) the recognized overfunded status under U.S. GAAP, and (ii) the result from the use of the “10% corridor approach” which is not applicable under IFRS.

(d)

Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

Under U.S. GAAP, capitalized interest is added to the individual assets and is amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company capitalizes only interest expenses to the extent that borrowings do not exceed the balances of constructionin-progress, as generally foreign exchange differences are not eligible for being recorded as part of the cost of the asset.

Under IFRS, financial charges on obligations financing assets and construction works in progress are capitalized, including interest expenses and certain foreign exchange differences.

Therefore, regarding capitalization of interest, net of amortization, there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the impact of capitalization of foreign exchange under IFRS.

(e)

Provision for onerous contracts

Under U.S. GAAP, future losses on firmly committed executory contracts (onerous contracts) typically are not recognized. Losses are recognized only when incurred.

Under IFRSs, an entity is required to recognize and measure the present obligation under an onerous contract as a provision. An onerous contract is one “in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it”.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

The Debenture accelerated maturity declarationCompany is party to a telecommunications signals transmission capacity supply agreement using submarine cables that connect North America and South America. Since the agreement’s obligations exceed the economic benefits that are expected to be received throughout the agreement and the costs are unavoidable, the Company recognized in 2018, pursuant to IAS 37, an onerous obligation measured at the lowest of net output cost of the agreement brought to present value, in the amount of R$ 4,493,894.

Therefore, regarding provision for onerous contracts there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of a provision that does not exist under U.S. GAAP.

(f)

Settlement ofJudicial Reorganization

U.S. GAAP

Under U.S. GAAP, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852 Reorganizations in preparing its consolidated financial statements. Under ASC 852, the company adopted the following accounting procedures:

Prepetition obligations impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings had been classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise in 2017. These liabilities were reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they were settled for lesser amounts;

Interest accruing on unsecured debt subsequent to the date of petition is not an allowed claim and therefore has not been accrued;

Foreign currency denominated liabilities in Reais using the applicable foreign currency translation rate as of the petition date. As a result there is no foreign currency translation adjustments recorded after the petition date related to prepetition liabilities under U.S. GAAP; and

Liabilities subject to compromise and other impacts from ASC 852 reorganizations

As a result of the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852Reorganizationsin preparing U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the judicial reorganization proceedings have been recorded in a reorganization line item in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the prepetition obligations that could be impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings were classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities were reported as the amounts expected allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they could be settled for lesser amounts.

The amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise were subsequently adjusted and reclassified to reflect the new legal terms and conditions established by the JRP Court and as of December 31, 2018 there are no outstanding liabilities subject to compromise.

On December 31, 2018, the Company did not emerge from bankruptcy, due to certain material unsatisfied conditions, which relates to additional capital increase that occurred on January 25, 2019.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

As a result nor will itof the judicial reorganization proceedings in Brazil and other international jurisdictions (which are considered to be similar in all substantive respects to Chapter 11) prepetition liabilities, as shown below were classified as subject to compromise based on the assessment of these obligations following the guidance ofASC 852 Reorganizations. Prepetition liabilities subject to compromise were required to be reported at the amount expected to be allowed as a claim by the Judicial Reorganization Court, regardless of whether they could be settled for lesser amounts and remain subject to future adjustments based on negotiated settlements with claimants, actions of the Judicial Reorganization Court, rejection of executory contracts, proofs of claims or other events. The following table reflects prepetition liabilities subject to compromise recorded under U.S. GAAP purpose as at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

December 31, 2018December 31, 2017

Borrowings and financing

—  49,129,547

Derivative financial instrument

—  104,694

Trade payables

—  2,139,312

Provision for civil contingencies—Anatel

—  9,333,795

Provision for pension plan

—  560,046

Other

—  43,333

Provision for labor contingencies

—  899,226

Provision for civil—other claims

—  2,929,275

Liabilities subject to compromise (*)

—  65,139,228

Reorganization items, net

Transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization were required, under the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, to separate disclosed and distinguished from those of the ongoing operations of the business. Under U.S. GAAP purposes the Company used the classification “Reorganization items, net” on the consolidated statements of operations to reflect expenses, gains and losses that were the direct result of the reorganization of its business.

   December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 

Gain on restructuring of Qualified Bonds

   12,881,478  

Adjustment to fair value—Borrowings and financing

   13,928,661  

Adjustment to present value—Anatel (AGU) and other payables

   5,577,234  

Anatel provision for contingencies

    (1,568,798

Other provision for contingencies (a)

   (347,437  (1,146,458

Income from short-term investments

   174,281   713,276 

Professional fees (b)

   (633,676  (369,938

Total reorganization items, net

   31,580,541   (2,371,918

Recognition of the effects of the ratification of the Judicial Reorganization Plan under U.S. GAAP

Under U.S. GAAP, as a result of the approval of JRP at the GCM meeting held on December 19 and 20, 2017 and its subsequent ratification by the Judicial Reorganization Court on January 8, 2018, and published on the Official Gazette on February 5, 2018, the Company’s management, based on the terms and conditions of the JRP, recorded the effects caused by the restructuring/novation of the prepetition liabilities subject to the Judicial Reorganization in the accelerated maturityconsolidated financial statements for year ended December 31, 2018.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The movements in the restructured prepetition liabilities and the accounting adjustments made for initial recognition of the other Company debt, both domesticterms and conditions set forth by the approved and ratified JRP, including the effects on the fair value of these liabilities pursuant to the criteria of ASC 820, and applicable GAAP, are as follow:

   December 31,
2017

U.S. GAAP
   Reclassifications  Mediations
and other
  Haircut
(i)
  Equity
(ii)
  Fair value /
Present
value (iii)
  Financial
charges
(iv)
   December 31,
2018

U.S. GAAP
 

Liabilities subject to compromise

           

Bondholders

   32,314,638    (32,314,638  —     —     —     —     —      —   

BNDES

   3,326,952    (3,326,952  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Other Borrowings and financing

   13,487,957    (13,487,957  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Derivative financial instrument

   104,694    (104,694  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Trade payables

   2,139,312    (2,139,312  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil contingencies—Anatel

   9,333,795    (9,333,795  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for pension plan

   560,046    (560,046  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Other

   43,333    (43,333  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for labor contingencies

   899,226    (1,036,172  136,946   —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil—other claims

   2,929,275    (2,218,538  (710,737  —     —     —     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total—Liabilities subject to compromise

   65,139,228    (64,565,437  (573,791  —     —     —     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Bondholders

   —      32,314,638   (161,600  (11,054,800  (11,613,980  (4,807,262  2,035,699    6,712,695 

BNDES – Borrowings and financing

   —      3,326,952   —     —     —     —     289,122    3,616,074 

Other Borrowings and financing

   —      13,592,651   50,375   —     —     (9,121,399  1,599,510    6,121,137 

Anatel (AGU) and other trade payables

   —      10,588,661   445,077   (1,826,678  —     (5,577,234  164,784    3,794,610 

Provision for labor, civil and Anatel contingencies

   —      4,182,489   56,975   —     —     —     149,173    4,388,637 

Provision for pension plan

   —      560,046   —     —     —     —     14,679    574,725 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total—Liabilities not subject to compromise

   —      64,565,437   390,827   (12,881,478  (11,613,980  (19,505,895  4,252,967    25,207,878 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(i)

Represent gains on restructuring of borrowings and financings, trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU and other trade payables, as a result of the JR Proceedings.

(ii)

Represent the fair value of shares issued in partial settlement of the Senior Notes.

(iii)

The financial liabilities have been adjusted to fair value according to the criteria of ASC 852 as of the time at which it has reclassified each of the financial liabilities that were legally affected by the JRP from liabilities subject to compromise to borrowings and financings or trade payables. It was calculated taking into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rates that range from 12.6% per year to 16.4% per year, depending on the maturities and currency of each instrument.

(iv)

Represent the contractual interest and foreign currency fluctuation calculated after completed the financial debt restructuring and other claims restructuring in the terms and conditions provided in the JRP.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

IFRS

Under IFRS, there is no specific guidance for accounting Bankruptcy Petitions as there is under U.S. GAAP. Financial liabilities were recorded as before the Bankruptcy Petition, including the accrual of interest based on the contracts, the recognition of foreign currency translation and the recognition of provisions based on expected payment cash outflow (IAS 37 for liability provisions). Liabilities subject to compromise were classified on the balance sheet as Current Liabilities. Any differences between the settlement of the liability and its carrying amount were reorganized upon settlement of the JRP and recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement at such time.

Because all liabilities subject to compromise were settled in 2018 under the conditions of the JRP, no GAAP differences compared to IFRS exist for the balances of liabilities after the settlement date.

Therefore, regarding settlement of judicial reorganization the only accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS are namely: (i) the impacts of settlement and fair value of liabilities for adopting ASC 852 under U.S. GAAP that needs to be excluded under IFRS; and (ii) the gain recognition on reversal of interest and foreign (cross-default).currency on loans and financings under IFRS.

The following is a summary of the Judicial Reorganization adjustments to net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Judicial reorganization

  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Settlement for lesser amounts of prepetition obligations and fair value recognition under U.S. GAAP

   (6,527,238  73,135 

Gain on reversal of interest and foreign currency on loans and financings under IFRS

   5,196,222   6,429,611 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (1,331,016  (6,502,746
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(g)

Deferred income tax

This relates to the impact of recalculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities considering the adjusted balances of accounts and related impacts on net income and the revised valuation allowance based on the reassessed schedule of expected generation of future taxable income under IFRS.

SUMARY OF ACCOUNTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The reconciliations below quantify the effect of the U.S. GAAP to IFRS on the indicated dates:

Reconciliation

     Equity  Net income 
     December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Under U.S.GAAP

    29,199,496   (9,684,061  27,393,837   (4,027,661

Impairment of long-lived assets

   (a  (1,226,125  (1,084,707  (141,418  5,526,563 

Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

   (b  44,981   40,859   4,122   4,313 

Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

   (c  (689,574  (1,598,792  (115,080  (197,700

Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

   (d  60,928   62,711   (1,780  (9,322

Provision for onerous contracts

   (e  (4,493,895   (4,493,895 

Settlement of judicial reorganization

   (f   1,331,016   (1,331,016  (6,502,746

Deferred income tax

   (g   (2,579,548  3,300,785   (1,449,609
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Under IFRS

    22,895,811   (13,512,522  24,615,555   (6,656,162
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

F-92

Reconciliation of balance sheet as at December 31, 2018

  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets

(a)
  

Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)

 

Pension plans
and other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)

 

Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization
(d)

 

Provision for
onerous contracts

(e)

 

Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)

 

Deferred
income tax

(g)

 

Reclassifications

 IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  4,385,329           4,385,329 

Short-term investments

  201,975           201,975 

Accounts receivable

  6,516,555           6,516,555 

Recoverable income taxes

  621,246           621,246 

Other taxes

  803,252           803,252 

Judicial Deposits

  1,715,934           1,715,934 

Inventories

  317,503           317,503 

Prepaid expenses

  743,953           743,953 

Pension plan assets

  4,880           4,880 

Held-for-sale assets

  4,923,187           4,923,187 

Other assets

  1,079,670           1,079,670 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

  21,313,484     —   —   —   —   —   —     21,313,484 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments

  36,987           36,987 

Other taxes

  715,976           715,976 

Deferred tax assets

  23,050           23,050 

Judicial Deposits

  7,018,786           7,018,786 

Investments

  117,840           117,840 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  28,468,798   (228,244 124,081  60,928      28,425,563 

Intangible assets

  8,025,442   (997,881 (79,115)        6,948,446 

Pension plan assets

  753,827    (689,574)       64,253 

Prepaid expenses

         522,550  522,550 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

  773,411         (522,549)  250,862 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totalnon-current assets

  45,934,117   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  44,124,313 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

  67,247,601   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  65,437,797 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade payables

  5,225,862         (201,602)  5,024,260 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

         201,602  201,602 

Borrowings and financing

  672,894           672,894 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

  906,655           906,655 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets

(a)
  

Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)

 

Pension plans
and other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)

 

Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization
(d)

 

Provision for
onerous contracts

(e)

 

Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)

 

Deferred
income tax

(g)

 

Reclassifications

 IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Income taxes payable

  27,026           27,026 

Other taxes

  1,033,868           1,033,868 

Tax financing program

  142,036           142,036 

Dividends and interest on capital

  6,168           6,168 

Provision

  680,542           680,542 

Unearned revenues

  229,497         (229,497) 

Advances from customers

  73,094         (73,094) 

Licenses and concessions payable

  85,619           85,619 

Liabilities associated toheld-for-sale assets

  526,870           526,870 

Other payables

  629,939      449,389   302,591  1,381,919 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  10,240,070   —    —   —   —   449,389 —   —     10,689,459 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

  3,593,008           3,593,008 

Borrowings and financing

  15,777,012           15,777,012 

Other taxes

  628,716           628,716 

Tax financing program

  411,170           411,170 

Provision

  4,358,178           4,358,178 

Provision for pension plans

  579,122           579,122 

Unearned revenues

  1,687,073         (1,687,073) 

Advances from customers

  142,134         (142,134) 

Other payables

  631,622   (13)   4,044,505   1,829,207  6,505,321 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totalnon-current liabilities

  27,808,035   —    — 13 —   —   4,044,505 —   —     31,852,527 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  38,048,105   —    (13) —   —   4,493,894 —   —     42,541,986 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity attributable to the Company and subsidiaries

  28,956,006   (1,226,125 44,979 (689,574) 60,928 (4,493,894) —   —     22,652,320 

Non-controlling interest

  243,490         1  243,491 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  29,199,496   (1,226,125 44,979 (689,574) 60,928 (4,493,894) —   —   1  22,895,811 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  67,247,601   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  65,437,797 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of net income for the year ended December 31, 2018

  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets (a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009 (b)
  Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits (c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization (d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts (e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization (f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments (g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Net operating revenue

  22,060,014           22,060,014 

Cost of sales and services

  (15,822,732  150,389   4,121   (45,457  (12,729  141,758     (594,450  (16,179,100

Gross profit

  6,237,282   150,389   4,121   (45,457  (12,729  141,758   —     —     (594,450  5,880,914 

Operating (expenses) income

          

Selling expenses

  (4,478,352    (28,655     372,977   281,028   (3,853,002

General and administrative expenses

  (2,697,865    (40,853       (2,738,718

Other operating income

          2,204,134   2,204,134 

Other operating expenses

  417,159   (291,807   (115   (4,883,620  (112,491   (1,890,712  6,761,586 

Reorganization items, net

  31,580,541        (31,580,541   

Loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes

  31,058,765   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (12,729  (4,741,862  (31,693,032  372,977    (5,268,258

Financial income (expenses), net

  (4,012,067     10,949   247,968   30,362,016     26,608,866 

Profit (loss) before taxes

  27,046,698   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  372,977    21,340,608 

Current income tax

          115,706   115,706 

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

  347,139         2,927,808   (115,706  3,159,241 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

  27,393,837   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

  27,369,422   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,591,140 

Profit (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

  24,415           24,415 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of net income for the year ended December 31, 2017

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets (a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009 (b)
   Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits (c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization (d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts (e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization (f)
  Deferred
income tax (g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Net operating revenue

   23,789,654              23,789,654 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,676,216  779,368    4,313    (82,045  (11,670      (682,403  (15,668,653

Gross profit

   8,113,438   779,368    4,313    (82,045  (11,670            (682,403  8,121,001 

Operating (expenses) income

              

Selling expenses

   (4,399,936      (42,901       340,281   (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   (3,064,252      (72,556        (3,136,808

Other operating income

              1,985,101   1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   (1,043,922  4,747,195      (198     (7,287,862   (1,642,979  (5,227,766

Reorganization items, net

   (2,371,918          2,371,918    

Loss before financial and taxes

   (2,766,590  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (11,670      (4,915,944      (2,361,028

Financial expenses, net

   (1,612,058       2,348     (1,586,802    (3,196,512

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (4,378,648  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746      (5,557,540

Current income tax

              (906,080  (906,080

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

   350,987            (1,449,609  906,080   (192,542
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,656,162
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss attributable to owners of the Company

   (3,736,518  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322  0    (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,365,019

Loss attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (291,143             (291,143

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts

(e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustment

(g)
   IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Profit (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (141,418  4,121    (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

            

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (110,098           (110,098
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   (110,098)                  (110,098) 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

            

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   (918,782     1,024,297        105,515 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   (918,782         1,024,297                105,515 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
                      

Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   312,386      (348,261       (35,875
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   312,386       (348,261)           (35,875) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   26,677,343   (141,418  4,121    560,956   (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,575,097 

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (49,966           (49,966
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

   26,727,309   (141,418  4,121    560,956   (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,625,063 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322  —      (6,502,746  (1,449,609  (6,656,162

Other comprehensive income (loss)

             

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   165,713            (1,943  163,770 

Decrease of interest shares in subsidiary

   (374,130           374,130    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (208,417)                 372,187  163,770 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

             

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   (130,846      161,099        30,253 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   (130,846          161,099                30,253 

Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

             

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   32,157       (42,528       (10,371
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   32,157        (42,528)           (10,371) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive (loss) for the year

   (4,334,767  5,526,563    4,313    (79,129  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,077,422  (6,472,510

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (64,153           (205,044  (269,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to controlling shareholders

   (4,270,614  5,526,563    4,313    (79,129  (9,322  —      (6,502,746  (872,378  (6,203,313
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2018

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
  Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Operating activities

           

Profit (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 

Income tax expenses

   (347,139                    (2,927,808   (3,274,947

Profit (loss) before income taxes

   27,046,698   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  372,977    21,340,608 

Income tax reclassification

   347,139         (347,139    

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

           

Loss (gain) on financial instruments

   3,415,354      (10,949  (389,726  (5,080,135   22,099   (2,043,357

Gains of restructuring of third-party borrowings

           (11,054,800    (11,054,800

Fair value adjustment to borrowings and financing

           (13,928,659    (13,928,659

Present value adjustment to other liabilities

           (1,167,043    (1,167,043

Depreciation and amortization

   5,952,905   (150,389  (4,121   12,729      (1  5,811,123 

Onerous obligation

        4,883,620      4,883,620 

Impairment ofheld-for-sale securities

   (292,799         292,799  

Estimated loss on doubtful debts

   1,224,248         (372,977   851,271 

Provisions (reversals)

   (19,465       112,491     93,026 

Provision for pension plans

   (114,813    115,080        267 

Impairment losses

   —     291,807         (49  291,758 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (231,433        231,433     

Reorganization items, net

   (31,580,541       31,580,541      

Equity in investees

           13,492   13,492 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

           215,398   215,398 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee—ANATEL

           68,333   68,333 

Employee and management profit sharing

           237,253   237,253 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals)

                  226,870   226,870 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program

                  28,079   28,079 

Other

                  (637,518  (637,518

Changes in assets and liabilities

                  

Accounts receivable

   (365,771                 (365,771

Inventories

                  (48,280  (48,280

Taxes

   121,951                  121,951 

Held-for-trading financial assets

   (1,191,664                 (1,191,664

Redemption of held-for-trading financial assets

   1,103,920                  1,103,920 

Trade payables

   (860,900                 (860,900

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (253,902                 (253,902

Provisions

   (434,974                 (434,974

Net increase in income taxes refundable and payable

   (799,189              115,706    683,483  

Employee and management profit sharing

   237,253                 (237,253 

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (257,643                 (257,643

Other assets and liabilities

   (183,838            868,621      (159,123  525,660 

Financial charges paid - debt

                  (19,215  (19,215

Financial charges paid - other

                  (2,884  (2,884

Income tax and social contribution paid—Company

                  (495,038  (495,038

Income tax and social contribution paid—third parties

                  (188,445  (188,445
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   2,862,536                                  2,862,536 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification   IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Investing activities

                   

Capital expenditures

   (5,246,241                  (5,246,241

Proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles

   22,276                   22,276 

Judicial deposits

   (775,953                  (775,953

Redemption of judicial deposits

   1,083,043                   1,083,043 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in by in investing activities

   (4,916,875                                  (4,916,875
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities

                   

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing and derivatives

   (161,884                  (161,884

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

   (1,491                  (1,491

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (265,495                  (265,495

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (54                  (54

Exercise of warrants

   4,580                   4,580 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (424,344                                  (424,344
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents

   1,328                   1,328 

Cash flows for the year

   (2,477,355                                  (2,477,355

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   6,862,684                   6,862,684 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   4,385,329                                   4,385,329 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2017

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
  Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Operating activities

            

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563   4,313   (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,656,162

Income tax

   (350,987                     1,449,609    1,098,622 

Loss before income taxes

   (4,378,648  5,526,563   4,313   (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746      (5,557,540

Income tax reclassification

   350,987          (350,987    

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

            

Loss (gain) on financial instruments

   (1,115,823     (2,348    6,234,447    3,927   5,120,203 

Present value adjustment to other liabilities

          (4,873,000    (4,873,000

Depreciation and amortization

   5,881,302   (779,368  (4,313   11,670       1   5,109,292 

Impairment (reversal) ofheld-for-sale securities

   267,008           (267,008   

Estimated loss on doubtful debts

   784,403            784,403 

Provisions

   143,517         7,218,787     7,362,304 

Provision for pension plans

   (197,141    197,700         559 

Impairment losses (reversal)

   46,534   (4,747,195         (46,480  (4,747,141

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (1,257,068         1,257,068     

Reorganization items, net

   2,371,918         (2,371,918   

Equity in investees

            433   433 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

            211,735   211,735 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee—ANATEL

            88,658   88,658 

Employee and management profit sharing

            298,789   298,789 

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals)

            674,668   674,668 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program

                27,294   27,294 

Other

                449,722   449,722 

Changes assets and liabilities

                

Accounts receivable

   (253,469               (253,469

Inventories

                173,283   173,283 

Taxes

   477,164                477,164 

Held-for-trading financial assets

   (601,200               (601,200

Redemption of held-for-trading financial assets

   775,456                775,456 

Trade payables

   (374,003               (374,003

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (42,727               (42,727

Provision for contingencies

   (114,336            (312,313    (426,649

Net increase in income taxes refundable and payable

   399,182              (906,081  506,899    

Provision for pension plans

   54               (54   

Employee and management profit sharing

   298,789               (298,789   

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   701,416                701,416 

Other

   238,443             606,743    (1,312,253  (467,067

Financial charges paid - debt

                (1,412  (1,412

Financial charges paid - other

                (2,515  (2,515

Income tax and social contribution paid—Company

                (314,162  (314,162

Income tax and social contribution paid—third parties

                (192,736  (192,736

Net cash provided by operating activities

   4,401,758                                4,401,758 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 
                                     

Investing activities

                  

Capital expenditures

   (4,344,238                 (4,344,238

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

   5,016                  5,016 

Judicial deposits

   (425,563                 (425,563

Redemption of judicial deposits

   343,129                  343,129 

Other

                  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in by in investing activities

   (4,421,656                                 (4,421,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

                  

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing

   (659                 (659

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

   (104,449                 (104,449

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (226,776                 (226,776

Share buyback

   (300,429                 (300,429

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (59,462                 (59,462
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (691,775                                 (691,775
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents

   11,106                 (1  11,105 

Cash flows for the year

   (700,567                              (1  (700,568

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   7,563,251                 1   7,563,252 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   6,862,684                                  6,862,684 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

* * *

F-111