UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM20-F

 

 

(Mark One)

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

���

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period fromto

OR

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number:001-34919

Kabushiki Kaisha Mitsui Sumitomo Financial Group

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

 

Japan  1-2, Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005,  Japan
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)  (Address of principal executive offices)

Takeshi MikamiJun Okahashi

1-2, Marunouchi1-chome,Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo100-0005, Japan

Telephone:+81-3-3282-8111         Facsimile:+81-3-4333-9954

(Name, telephone,e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

 

Name of Each Exchange on which registered

Common stock, without par valueAmerican Depositary Shares

SMFG The New York Stock Exchange*Exchange

Common stock, without par value*

 

*

Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of the American Depositary Shares, each American Depositary Share representing 1/5 of one share of the registrant’s common stock.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

At March 31, 2018,2021, the following shares of capital stock were outstanding: 1,414,443,3901,374,040,061 shares of common stock (including 3,884,9683,612,302 shares of common stock held by the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries and equity-method associates as treasury stock).

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer  ☒ Accelerated Filer  ☐ Non-accelerated Filer  ☐ Emerging Growth Company  ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☒

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  ☐  International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board  ☒  Other  ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.    Item 17  ☐    Item 18  ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

        Page 

Certain Defined Terms, Conventions and Presentation of Financial Information

   1 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

   2 

PART I

   3 
 Item 1.  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers   3 
 Item 2.  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable   3 
 Item 3.  Key Information   3 
     3.A.  Selected Financial Data   3 
     3.B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness   54 
     3.C.  Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds   54 
     3.D.  Risk Factors   54 
 Item 4.  Information on the Company   1922 
     4.A.  History and Development of the Company   1922 
     4.B.  Business Overview   2023 
     4.C.  Organizational Structure   5459 
     4.D.  Property, Plant and Equipment   5661 
 Item 4A.  Unresolved Staff Comments   5762 
 Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects   5762 
     5.A.  Operating Results   6672 
     5.B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources   105104 
     5.C.  Research, Development, Patents and Licenses   111109 
     5.D.  Trend Information   111109 
     5.E.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements   111109 
     5.F.  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations   112111 
     5.G.  Safe Harbor   112111 
 Item 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees   112111 
     6.A.  Directors and Senior Management   112111 
     6.B.  Compensation   120121 
     6.C.  Board Practices   121122 
     6.D.  Employees   124126 
     6.E.  Share Ownership   125127 
 Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions   128132 
     7.A.  Major Shareholders   128132 
     7.B.  Related Party Transactions   129132 
     7.C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel   129133 
 Item 8.  Financial Information   129133 
     8.A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information   129133 
     8.B.  Significant Changes   130134 
 Item 9.  The Offer and Listing   130134 
     9.A.  Offer and Listing Details   130134 
     9.B.  Plan of Distribution   132134 
     9.C.  Markets   132134 
     9.D.  Selling Shareholders   132134 
     9.E.  Dilution   132134 
     9.F.  Expenses of the Issue   133134 
 Item 10.  Additional Information   133135 
     10.A.  Share Capital   133135 
     10.B.  Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation   133135 
     10.C.  Material Contracts   143145 
     10.D.  Exchange Controls   143145 

 

i


        Page 
     10.E.  Taxation   144149 
     10.F.  Dividends and Paying Agents   148153 
     10.G.  Statement by Experts   148153 
     10.H.  Documents on Display   148153 
     10.I.  Subsidiary Information   149153 
 Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk   149153 
 Item 12.  Description of Securities other than Equity Securities   164168 
     12.A.  Debt Securities   164168 
     12.B.  Warrants and Rights   164168 
     12.C.  Other Securities   164168 
     12.D.  American Depositary Shares   164168 

PART II

   166170 
 Item 13.  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies   166170 
 Item 14.  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds   166170 
 Item 15.  Controls and Procedures   166170 
 Item 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert   167171 
 Item 16B.  Code of Ethics   167171 
 Item 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services   167171 
 Item 16D.  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for the Audit Committee   168172 
 Item 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers   168172 
 Item 16F.  Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant   169172 
 Item 16G.  Corporate Governance   169173 
 Item 16H.  Mine Safety Disclosure   170174 

PART III

   171175 
 Item 17.  Financial Statements   171175 
 Item 18.  Financial Statements   171175 
 Item 19.  Exhibits   171175 

Signatures

   173177 

Selected Statistical Data

   A-1 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-1 

 

ii


CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS, CONVENTIONS AND

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

As used in this annual report, unless the context otherwise requires, “SMFG,“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our”“SMFG” and similar terms refer to Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. as well as to its subsidiaries, as the context requires. “SMBC” refers to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, which is one of our commercial banking subsidiaries, or to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, depending on the context. References to the “SMBC Group” are to us and our subsidiaries and affiliates taken as a whole.

In this annual report, all of our financial information is presented on a consolidated basis, unless we state otherwise. As used in this annual report, “IFRS” means International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Boards (“IASB”) and “Japanese GAAP” means accounting principles generally accepted in Japan. Our consolidated financial information in this annual report has been prepared in accordance with IFRS, except for the risk-weighted capital ratios, the segment results of operation and some other specifically identified information, which are prepared in accordance with Japanese banking regulations or Japanese GAAP. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, all financial information contained in this annual report is expressed in Japanese yen.

Our fiscal year ends on March 31.

Unless otherwise specified or required by the context: references to “days” are to calendar days; references to “years” are to calendar years and to “fiscal years” are to our fiscal years ending on March 31; references to “$,” “dollars” and “U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars; references to “euros” and “€” are to the currency of those member states of the European Union which are participating in the European Economic and Monetary Union pursuant to the Treaty on European Union; references to “£” and “British pounds sterling” are to the currency of the United Kingdom; and references to “yen” and “¥” are to Japanese yen. Unless otherwise specified, when converting currencies into yen we use our median exchange rates for buying and selling spot dollars, or other currencies, by telegraphic transfer against yen as determined at the end of the relevant fiscal period.

Unless otherwise indicated, in this annual report, where information is presented in millions, billions or trillions of yen or thousands, millions or billions of dollars, amounts of less than one thousand, one million, one billion or one trillion, as the case may be, have been rounded. Accordingly, the total of figures presented in columns or otherwise may not equal the total of the individual items. Except for capital ratios, which have been truncated, percentage data, unless we state otherwise have been subjected to rounding adjustments for the convenience of the reader.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Securities Exchange Act of 1934”). When included in this annual report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “probability,” “risk,” “project,” “should,” “seek,” “target,” “will” and similar expressions, among others, identify forward-looking statements. You can also identify forward-looking statements in the discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Such statements, which include, but are not limited to, statements contained in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk,” reflect our current views with respect to future events and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risk factors described in this annual report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described here as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended.

The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking information to encourage companies to provide prospective information about themselves. We rely on this safe harbor in making these forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, and the differences may be material. Potential risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

 

the lasting effects of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and collateral events;

deterioration of Japanese and global economic conditions and financial markets;

 

declines in the value of our securities portfolio;

 

changes in the level or volatility of market rates or prices;

 

constraints on our operations due to capital adequacy requirements;

 

problems of other financial institutions;

 

adverse regulatory developments or changes in government policies;

 

incurrence of significant credit-related costs;

 

a significant downgrade of our credit ratings;

 

exposure to new risks as we expand the scope of our business;

 

our ability to successfully implement our business strategy through our subsidiaries, affiliates and alliance partners;

 

the industry specific risks of the consumer finance industry;

 

the recoverability of deferred tax assets;

 

insufficient liquidity; and

 

litigation and regulatory proceedings.

Given these and other risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the filing of this annual report. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or to announce publicly any revision to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report to reflect any changes in events, conditions, circumstances or other developments upon which any such statement is based. The information contained in this annual report identifies important factors in addition to those referred to above that could cause differences in our actual results.

PART I

 

Item 1.

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

 

Item 2.

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

 

Item 3.

Key Information

3.A.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data at and for each of the five fiscal years ended March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 2017, 2016, 2015 and 20142017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. You should read this data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

 

 For the fiscal year ended and at March 31,  For the fiscal year ended and at March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 
 (In millions, except per share data)  (In millions, except per share data) 

Consolidated income statement data:

          

Interest income

 ¥    2,144,070  ¥    1,900,261  ¥    1,872,584  ¥    1,782,621  ¥    1,714,044  ¥    1,780,370  ¥    2,407,045  ¥    2,406,350  ¥    2,144,070  ¥    1,900,261 

Interest expense

 733,969  502,338  431,101  371,107  320,511  397,245  1,090,730  1,137,430  771,907  540,518 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

 1,410,101  1,397,923  1,441,483  1,411,514  1,393,533  1,383,125  1,316,315  1,268,920  1,372,163  1,359,743 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fee and commission income

 1,131,364  1,066,412  1,031,680  1,002,766  1,003,169  1,174,382  1,147,132  1,101,777  1,131,364  1,066,412 

Fee and commission expense

 178,867  181,573  131,381  129,253  127,959  201,723  203,822  178,351  178,867  181,573 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net fee and commission income

 952,497  884,839  900,299  873,513  875,210  972,659  943,310  923,426  952,497  884,839 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net trading income

 270,464  183,963  462,682  127,759  135,218  237,746  134,069  320,302  270,464  183,963 

Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 (667 2,018  12,260  22,678  58,586 

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

 280,012  (21,939 54,655  (667 2,018 

Net investment income

 424,097  305,327  375,229  371,064  332,265  153,820  176,464  93,922  424,097  305,327 

Other income

 755,855  573,825  496,273  525,905  429,541  138,223  155,631  505,666  755,855  573,825 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating income

 3,812,347  3,347,895  3,688,226  3,332,433  3,224,353  3,165,585  2,703,850  3,166,891  3,774,409  3,309,715 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Impairment charges (reversals) on financial assets

 136,808  212,967  148,356  90,138  (14,275

Impairment charges on financial assets

 282,486  259,938  119,686  136,808  212,967 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net operating income

 3,675,539  3,134,928  3,539,870  3,242,295  3,238,628  2,883,099  2,443,912  3,047,205  3,637,601  3,096,748 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 1,813,121  1,752,135  1,706,263  1,621,897  1,522,990  1,679,115  1,696,386  1,679,813  1,775,183  1,713,955 

Other expenses

 792,765  531,759  538,963  505,614  428,780  283,879  488,806  575,657  792,765  531,759 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

 2,605,886  2,283,894  2,245,226  2,127,511  1,951,770  1,962,994  2,185,192  2,255,470  2,567,948  2,245,714 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures

 49,323  29,318  31,056  18,124  19,454  36,373  24,031  40,157  49,323  29,318 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

 1,118,976  880,352  1,325,700  1,132,908  1,306,312  956,478  282,751  831,892  1,118,976  880,352 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

 229,378  139,766  372,878  409,947  414,076  251,402  51,768  184,306  229,378  139,766 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net profit

 ¥889,598  ¥740,586  ¥952,822  ¥722,961  ¥892,236  ¥705,076  ¥230,983  ¥647,586  ¥889,598  ¥740,586 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  For the fiscal year ended and at March 31, 
  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
  (In millions, except per share data) 

Profit attributable to:

     

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

 ¥759,998   ¥627,870  ¥843,920  ¥614,070  ¥766,388  

Non-controlling interests

  119,878   104,787   106,129   108,891   125,848 

Other equity instruments holders

  9,722   7,929   2,773   —     —   

Earnings per share:

     

Basic

 ¥539  ¥459  ¥617  ¥449  ¥561 

Diluted

  538   458   617   449   561 

Weighted average number of common shares in issue
(in thousands of shares)

      1,410,442       1,369,231       1,367,229       1,367,258       1,366,186 

Dividends per share in respect of each fiscal year:

     

Common stock

 ¥155  ¥150  ¥155  ¥125  ¥125 
 $1.46  $1.34  $1.38  $1.04  $1.22 

Consolidated statement of financial position data:

     

Total assets

 ¥192,175,566  ¥191,150,981  ¥180,172,652  ¥ 179,181,466  ¥158,631,041 

Loans and advances

  85,129,070   95,273,845   88,862,371   86,971,716   81,244,982 

Total liabilities

  179,679,767   179,263,698   169,130,553   168,160,616   149,215,851 

Deposits

  128,461,527   130,295,290   125,940,797   115,833,980   108,370,494 

Borrowings

  10,652,481   12,245,943   9,914,129   11,217,052   8,463,363 

Debt securities in issue

  10,569,117   11,165,623   10,829,612   11,051,431   8,769,094 

Total equity

  12,495,799   11,887,283   11,042,099   11,020,850   9,415,190 

Capital stock

  2,338,743   2,337,896   2,337,896   2,337,896   2,337,896 

Exchange Rates

We maintain our accounts in yen. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the median exchange rates for buying and selling spot dollars by telegraphic transfer against yen as determined by SMBC, expressed in Japanese yen per $1.00.

   High   Low   Period end   Average(1) 
   (Yen per dollar) 

Fiscal year ended March 31,

        

2014

  ¥105.37   ¥92.91   ¥102.88   ¥100.47 

2015

   121.59    101.25    120.15    110.61 

2016

   125.51    111.17    112.62    120.12 

2017

   118.20    99.81    112.19    108.69 

2018

   114.38    104.94    106.25    110.66 

Most recent six months:

        

December

   113.65    112.40    113.00    113.03 

January

   113.16    108.73    108.77    110.87 

February

   109.87    106.29    107.30    107.97 

March

   106.97    104.94    106.25    106.08 

April

   109.37    105.85    109.26    107.45 

May

   111.10    108.43    108.67    109.76 

June (through June 15, 2018)

   110.73    108.96    110.73    109.99 

(1)Average exchange rates have been calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during a fiscal year, except for the monthly average rates, which represent the averages of the exchange rates for each day of the relevant months.

The median exchange rate quotation by SMBC for buying and selling spot dollars by telegraphic transfer against yen on June 15, 2018 was ¥110.73 = $1.00.

These exchange rates are reference rates and are neither necessarily the rates used to calculate ratios nor the rates used to convert dollars to yen in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

  For the fiscal year ended and at March 31, 
  2021  2020  2019  2018  2017 
  (In millions, except per share data) 

Profit attributable to:

     

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

 ¥687,483  ¥200,052  ¥541,932  ¥759,998  ¥627,870 

Non-controlling interests

  4,471   18,567   93,779   119,878   104,787 

Other equity instruments holders

  13,122   12,364   11,875   9,722   7,929 

Earnings per share:

     

Basic

 ¥502  ¥145  ¥388  ¥539  ¥459 

Diluted

  501   145   387   538   458 

Weighted average number of common shares in issue (in thousands of shares)

      1,370,214       1,375,118       1,397,599       1,410,442       1,369,231 

Dividends per share in respect of each fiscal year:

     

Common stock

 ¥195  ¥185  ¥175  ¥155  ¥150 
 $1.76  $1.70  $1.58  $1.46  $1.34 

Consolidated statement of financial position data:

     

Total assets

 ¥235,024,987  ¥212,158,463  ¥195,503,623  ¥192,175,566  ¥191,150,981 

Loans and advances

  97,714,938   94,671,818   90,682,938   85,129,070   95,273,845 

Total liabilities

  222,748,837   201,223,585   183,730,177   179,679,767   179,263,698 

Deposits

  155,493,654   138,431,418   134,404,652   128,461,527   130,295,290 

Borrowings

  19,423,355   17,121,362   12,167,858   10,652,481   12,245,943 

Debt securities in issue

  11,228,600   10,985,048   11,171,209   10,569,117   11,165,623 

Total equity

  12,276,150   10,934,878   11,773,446   12,495,799   11,887,283 

Capital stock

  2,341,274   2,339,965   2,339,443   2,338,743   2,337,896 

3.B.    CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not applicable.

3.C.    REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

3.D.    RISK FACTORS

Investing in our securities involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as all the other information in this annual report, including, but not limited to, our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk.” Our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by any factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below. The trading prices of our securities could also decline due to any of these factors including, but not limited to, those discussed below. Moreover, this annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could also differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this annual report. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Forward-looking statements in this section are made only as of the filing date of this annual report.

Risks Related to the Economic and Financial Environment

Our businesses, financial condition and results of operations have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and collateral events.

Since December 2019, COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the implementation of numerous measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as restrictions on movement and closures of schools, businesses, factories and other public and private facilities in many countries and regions. These measures have significantly affected people’s lives and business activities. Coupled with these measures, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on both Japanese and global economic conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is considered to be an important tool to help stop the COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccination has already begun in many countries. However, there remains uncertainty whether vaccines will be produced, distributed and administered as expected, and effective against new variants of COVID-19. Even if the number of new COVID-19 cases significantly decreases in many countries including Japan, this global pandemic and its negative effects on global economic conditions may persist into the future. Even in countries that succeed in significantly reducing the number of the cases from the current outbreak, the level of economic activity may not fully recover in the short term or at all due to concerns of future waves of COVID-19 and the emergence of new variants of COVID-19 or changes in lifestyle and business practices. Therefore, the Japanese and global economy may remain volatile or continue to deteriorate.

If the Japanese and global economy remain volatile or continue to deteriorate due to the COVID-19 pandemic and collateral events, the balance of our impaired loans and credit-related costs may further increase due to deterioration in the financial condition of our customers. Additionally, disruption and volatility in financial markets may have an adverse effect on our funding activities and could subject our holdings of securities to impairment or valuation losses. Also, a decline in overall economic activity may cause us to miss business opportunities and this may adversely affect the execution of our operating strategy and our results of operations. Furthermore, since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been continuing to provide services such as financing and settlement to fulfill our responsibility as a financial institution, which is a part of the social infrastructure. In carrying out that responsibility, we may be requested to provide new and additional financing to customers, and these may increase our risk assets and lead to a lower capital adequacy ratio and to additional credit-related losses. From a business operational standpoint, if our efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within our workforce, such as enabling telework for employees and separating staff into two or more teams on alternating shifts, are ineffective or lead to decreased productivity and many of our employees contract the virus, such circumstances could adversely affect the operation of our businesses or force us to temporarily suspend operations. Furthermore, cyberattacks and financial crimes may increase under the new working arrangements such as expanded telework for employees.

The extent of the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance remains uncertain and will depend on many factors beyond our control, including the duration of the pandemic and further spread of the virus. To the extent that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, results of operations and financial condition, it may also have the effect of increasing the likelihood and magnitude of the other risks described in “Item 3.D. Risk Factors.”

For detailed information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operating environment, our results of operations and our financial condition, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

We may be adversely affected if Japanese and global economic conditions and financial markets deteriorate.

Our financial condition and results of operations are materially affected by general economic conditions and financial markets in Japan and foreign countries, which would be influenced by the changes of various factors. These include fiscal andfactors such as monetary policies taken by the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) and other central banks, and fiscal policies, policies on financial markets, as well as related laws, regulations and policies on financial markets.agreements adopted by governmental authorities. Those factors

include, for example, monetary easing by the Japanese consumption tax rate. The Japanese consumption tax rate was scheduled to increase from 8% to 10% in April 2017. However,BOJ and the increase inof tariffs and other protectionist trade policies of countries including the consumption tax rate to 10% was postponed until October 2019.U.S. Furthermore, geopolitical instability in various parts of the world, including North Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Eastern Europe, and material changes in regional economic or political unions or associations between countries, including, for example,such as the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union, which took place on January 31, 2020, could also contribute to economic instability in those and other regions, whichregions. Such regional economic instability could adversely affect Japanese and global economic conditions.

The deterioration of Japanese and global economic conditions, or financial market turmoil, could result in a worsening of our liquidity and capital conditions, an increase in our credit costs, and an increasea decrease in impairmentthe fair values of our investment securities and, as a result, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future declines ofin securities prices on Japanese stock markets or other global markets could cause us to experience realized and unrealized losses on our equity securities portfolio, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and regulatory capital position.

The reported value of ouravailable-for-sale equity instruments accounted for 3.0% of our total assets at March 31, 2018, approximately 88.4% of which were Japanese equity securities. This value depends mainly on prices of the instruments in the stock market. In addition, the reported value, gross unrealized gains and losses, and cost of thoseavailable-for-sale equity instruments at March 31, 2018 are described in “Item 5.A. Operating Results—Investment Securities.”

The value of a listed equity security is measured at its market price. Declines in the Japanese stock markets or other global markets could result in realized and unrealized losses on the securities in our equity securities portfolio, adversely affecting our results of operations and financial condition.

Our regulatory capital position and that of SMBC depend in part on the fair value of our equity securities portfolio. Substantial declines in the Japanese stock markets or other global markets would negatively affect our and SMBC’s capital positions, and limit SMBC’s ability to make distributions to us.

We will further reduceOur equity securities portfolio mainly consists of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income. The reported value of our holdingsequity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income accounted for 2.0% of our total assets at March 31, 2021, approximately 85.5% of which were Japanese equity securities. This value depends mainly on prices of the instruments in the stock market. In addition, the reported value, and gross unrealized gains and losses of those equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2021 are described in “Item 5.A. Operating Results—Financial Condition—Investment Securities.”

In recent years, we have been reducing our strategic equityshareholding investments in order to reducemitigate the impact of share price fluctuations on our financial risks.base. Any further disposal by us of equity holdings of our customers’ shares could in turn cause our customers to dispose of their equity holdings of our shares, which could adversely affect the market price of our relationships with those customers.shares.

Changes in the levels or volatility of market rates or prices could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We engage in trading and investing activities dealing with various kinds of financial instruments such as bonds, equities, currencies, derivatives and funds. For example, we have substantial investments in debt securities. At March 31, 2018,2021, we had ¥8¥14 trillion of Japanese government bonds classified asavailable-for-sale financial assets, debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, which accounted for approximately 4.0%6.1% of our total assets.

Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by actual changes or volatility in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and market prices of other investment securities. Increases in interest

rates could substantially decrease the value of our fixed income portfolio, and any unexpected changes in yield curves could adversely affect the value of our bond and interest rate derivative positions, resulting in lower-than-expected revenues from trading and investment activities. Market volatility may also result in significant realized and unrealized losses or impairment losses on such instruments. Furthermore, the downgrading of investment securities by credit rating agencies may also cause declines in the value of our securities portfolio.

Risks Related to Our Business

Failure to satisfy capital adequacy requirements could constrain our and SMBC’s operations.

We and SMBC are subject to capital adequacy requirements established by the Financial Services Agency of Japan (“FSA”). The current requirements reflect which are based on the principal risk-weighted capital measures of the Basel III rules text published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) in December 2010 and are being phased in from March 2013 to March 2019. Compared to the previous requirements, the current requirements increase both the quality and quantity of the risk-weighted capital base..

With respect to the quality of the capital base, certain capital instruments, including existing preferred securities and subordinated debt, are eligible for inclusion as Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital only for the prescribed 10-year phase-out period. Preferred stocks convertible into common stocks no longer qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 capital but would qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital if they satisfy certain requirements including the requirement of loss absorbency at the point ofnon-viability under the Basel III rules. In addition, securities withstep-up clauses will no longer qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital, and if the relevant security is classified as a liability for accounting purposes, it must satisfy the requirement of loss absorbency at apre-specified trigger point, which must be 5.125% or more of Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio as well as the aforementioned requirement of loss absorbency at the point ofnon-viability to qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital. With respect to Tier 2 capital, under the Basel III rules, the relevant security must satisfy the requirement of loss absorbency at the point ofnon-viability to qualify as Tier 2 capital, and subordinated debt securities callable at the initiative of the issuer within five years or withstep-up clauses can no longer qualify as Tier 2 capital.

With respect to the quantity of the capital base, the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratiosratio and minimum risk-weighted capital ratio applicable to us and SMBC have been 4.5% and 8% respectively since March 2015. Moreover, we are required to hold a capital conservation buffer to withstand future periods of stress and a countercyclical buffer as additional capital to reduce the buildup of systemic risk in periods and locations of excessive credit growth. The capital conservation buffer started to be phased in from March 2016, with the initial ratio of 0.625% reachinghas been 2.5% bysince March 2019. Under thephase-in arrangement, we are currently required to maintain 1.875% of Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital as a percentage of risk weighted assets. As a result, taking the capital conservation buffer into account at March 2021, the total minimum Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio will be increased tohas been 7%, and the total minimum risk-weighted capital ratio will be increased tohas been 10.5% in March 2019.. The countercyclical buffer which started to be phased in from March 2016, is calculated as the weighted average of the buffers in effect in the jurisdictions to which we have credit exposure, with a maximum of 2.5% when fully implemented infrom March 2019.

In addition, the requirements for additional capital, in the form of a capital surcharge above the Basel III minimum requirement, have been applied from 2016 to those financial institutions identified by the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) as Global Systemically Important Banks(“G-SIBs”), including us. This requirement is commonly referred to as theG-SIB capital surcharge. The FSB updates its list of G-SIBs on an annual basis. Based on the list, we will behave been required to maintain an additional 1% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets whenfrom 2019.

In March 2019, the requirement is fullyFSA published its guidelines for the leverage ratio applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations, which have been applied from March 31, 2019. Under the FSA’s guidelines for the leverage ratio, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain a leverage ratio of at least 3% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis from March 31, 2019. On June 30, 2020, in light of the increasing impact of the phase-inCOVID-19 requirements, we are currently requiredpandemic, the FSA published amendments to its guidelines for the leverage ratio, which mainly exclude deposits with the BOJ from the denominator for the calculation of the leverage ratio in order to maintain 0.75%harmonization with the monetary policy implemented by the BOJ and the prudential regulations for banks and other financial institutions. These amendments came into effect on June 30, 2020 and were scheduled to expire on March 31, 2021. On March 31, 2021, the FSA extended the expiry date of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.these amendments to March 31, 2022.

G-SIBs willare also be subject to a global standard for Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (“TLAC”), which defines certain minimum requirements for total loss-absorbing capacity so that ifG-SIBs fail, they will have sufficient loss absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution. In November 2015, the FSB published the final TLAC standard. As aG-SIB, we will be subject to the final TLAC standard, as implemented in Japan.

final TLAC standards (“FSB’s TLAC Standards”) and, in March 2019, the FSA published its regulatory guidelines and related documents for the implementation of the TLAC standards in Japan (“Japanese TLAC Standards”) to which we are subject as a G-SIB.

At March 31, 2018,2021, on a consolidated basis, our total risk-weighted capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio and Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio were 19.36 %,16.69 %18.61%, 16.96% and 14.50 %,16.00%, compared to the minimum required ratios of 10.655%11.52%, 8.655%9.52% and 7.155%8.02%, respectively. All theSuch minimum required ratios stated above include the capital conservation buffer of 1.875%2.5%, theG-SIB capital surcharge of 0.75%1.0% and the countercyclical buffer of 0.03%0.02%.

Our and SMBC’s capital ratios could decline as a result of decreases in Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital or increases in risk-weighted assets. The following circumstances, among others, could reduce our risk-weighted capital ratio and that of SMBC:

 

declines in the value of securities;

 

inability to refinance existing subordinated debt obligations or preferred securities eligible for inclusion as Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital only for the prescribed 10-year phase-out period with those qualified as regulatory capital under the new capital adequacy requirements which phased in from March 2013; and

 

increases in risk-weighted assets resulting from business growth, strategic investments, borrower downgrades, changes in parameters such as probability of default (“PD”) or regulatory reforms.

We and SMBC have adopted the advanced internal rating-based (“IRB”) approach for measuring exposure to credit risk and the advanced measurement approach (“AMA”) to measure exposure to operational risk. If the FSA revokes its approval of such implementation or otherwise changes its approach to measure capital adequacy ratios, our and SMBC’s ability to maintain capital at the required levels may be adversely affected.

OnIn December 7, 2017, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (the “GHOS”) endorsed the outstanding Basel III regulatory reforms. The endorsed reforms include the following elements:

 

a revised standardized approach for credit risk;

 

revisions to the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk;

 

revisions to the credit valuation adjustment framework;

 

a revised standardized approach for operational risk;

 

revisions to the measurement of the leverage ratio and a leverage ratio buffer forG-SIBs; and

 

revision

revisions to the capital floor.

We will be subject to the final Basel III reform, as implemented in Japan.

If our or SMBC’s capital ratios fall below required levels, the FSA may require us or SMBC to take a variety of corrective actions, including withdrawal from all international operations or suspension of all or part of our operations, which may indirectly affect our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations or may result in restrictions on our businesses. Failure to maintain capital levels under the capital buffer requirements under Basel III and the requirement for theG-SIB capital surcharge will result in restrictions on capital distributions, such as dividends, share buybacks, discretionary payments on other Tier 1 capital instruments and bonuses. In addition, some of our and SMBC’s domestic and overseas subsidiaries are also subject to local capital ratio requirements. Failure of those subsidiaries to meet local requirements may result in administrative actions or sanctions imposed by local regulatory authorities.

We may incur losses as a result of financial difficulties of counterparties and other financial institutions.

We regularly execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of deterioration of creditworthiness of a counterparty or client. With respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral cannot be foreclosed on or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or other exposures due to us.

Losses from our investments in and loans to other financial institutions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be requested to participate in providing assistance to distressed financial institutions that are not our subsidiaries. In addition, if the funds collected by the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan (“DIC”) are insufficient to insure the deposits of failed Japanese banks, the insurance premiums that we pay to the DIC will likely be increased, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Adverse regulatory developments or changes in government policies could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and associated regulatory risks, including the effects of changes in the laws, regulations, policies, voluntary codes of practice and interpretations in Japan and the other jurisdictions in which we operate. Those changes and their effects on us are unpredictable and beyond our control.

Changes inThe Banking Act authorizes the regulatory environment may adversely affect our financial conditionFSA to inspect banks and results of operations. In particular, the financial crisis in 2008 has led to calls for significant financial reform measures, and various governments are at different stages of enacting or implementing legislation that affects financial institutions.

In response to the turmoil following the financial crisis, regulatory authorities reviewed and revised capital adequacy guidelines, particularly in relation to quality of capital and accounting standards; such revisions could adversely affect our capital ratios. In December 2010, the BCBS published the Basel III rules text, setting out certain changes to capital requirements which include raising the quality of banks’ capital bases, enhancing risk coverage, inhibiting leverage, reducingpro-cyclicality and introducing liquidity regulation, many of which have been fully applied orphased-inbank holding companies in Japan based on the Basel III implementation schedule.

at any time and with any frequency. The FSA’s Financial Inspection Manual for financial institutions and related guidelinesinspection processes are revised or amended from time to time. On December 15, 2017, the FSA issued a plan to repeal the FSA’s Financial Inspection Manual after April 1, 2019, and published a report outlining its new supervisory approaches. Our compliance with any such changes in the FSA’s inspection process under the new supervisory approaches could result in an increase in our administrative expenses, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The FSA and regulatory authorities in the United States and other jurisdictions, along with the United Nations and the Financial Action Task Force, have in recent years madecontinued to make the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing a focus of governmental policy relating to financial institutions. In April 2019, SMBC and its New York branch entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York requiring SMBC and its New York branch to address certain deficiencies relating to the New York branch’s anti-money laundering and economic sanctions compliance program. SMBC and its New York branch are required, among other things, to implement corrective measures and submit periodic progress reports to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. If we fail to comply with the terms of the written agreement, we may become subject to monetary penalties and other regulatory sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Further, as a result of the deficiencies identified in the written agreement, we no longer meet the requirements to be treated as a financial holding company, and, pending completion of a remediation plan designed to meet these requirements, we are currently subject to restrictions in our ability to engage in certain new categories of financial activities in the United States and to make acquisitions of companies engaged in activities in the United States. If we fail to correct the conditions giving rise to such restrictions within the prescribed period of time, we may be required to divest or terminate certain business activities in the United States, which could adversely affect our operations and impair our ability to implement our business plans. Although we are committed to improving compliance with laws and regulations relating to anti-money laundering and economic sanctions, we will continue to be subject to ongoing inspection by the regulatory authorities in the United States and other jurisdictions. Any adverse regulatory action or change in regulatory focus, whether as a result of inspections or regulatory developments, may negatively affect our banking operations, cause harm to our reputation, and may requireresult in expensive remediation.remediation, monetary penalties and other regulatory sanctions.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) provides a broad framework for significant regulatory changes across most areas of U.S. financial regulations. The Dodd-Frank Act addresses, among other issues, systemic risk oversight, bank capital standards, the resolution of failing systemically significant financial institutions,over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, the

ability of banking entities to engage in proprietary trading activities and invest in hedge funds and private equity funds, consumer and investor protection, and securitization. The Dodd-Frank Act as well as

We expect that the Biden Administration and the Democratically-controlled Congress will seek to implement a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different than that of the Trump Administration. This reform agenda could include, among other post-financial crisis regulatory reforms inthings, a heightened focus on the United States have increased costs, imposed limitations on activities and resulted in an increased intensity in regulatory enforcement and fines across the banking and financial services sector. The current U.S. Presidential administration has expressed different policy goals with respect to regulation of loan portfolios and credit concentrations to borrowers impacted by climate change, heightened scrutiny of the U.S. financial system, but theBank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering requirements. It is too early for us to assess which, if any of these, policies would be implemented and what their impact that the U.S. Presidential administration’s policy goalson us would be.

These and similar, or any new or proposed legislation could have on the regulatory requirements currently imposed on us remains uncertain.

Significantother kind of significant regulatory developments could adversely affect our capital ratios and results of operations. For further details, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan, Regulations in the United States, and Regulations in Other Jurisdictions.” Since changes in regulation or fiscal or other policies and their effects are unpredictable and beyond our control, we may not be able to comply with those changes at all times, despite our efforts, or may have to incur increased costs or make changes to our operations in order to do so. Any such failures to comply with those changes could result in administrative or judicial proceedings against us, including suspension of our business and financial penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

The transition away from and discontinuation of LIBOR and other interest rate benchmarks could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

For several years, global regulators and central banks have been pursuing international efforts to reform interest rate benchmarks, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. On March 5, 2021, the FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration, the authorized and regulated administrator of LIBOR, announced that all the GBP, CHF, JPY, EUR LIBOR settings and the one-week and two month USD LIBOR settings will cease after December 31, 2021, and the remaining USD LIBOR settings will cease after June 30, 2023.

We have identified a significant number of assets and liabilities linked to LIBOR and other interest rate benchmarks, across businesses that require transition to alternative reference rates.

The transition away from and discontinuation of LIBOR and other interest rate benchmarks, uncertainty as to the availability and/or suitability of alternative reference rates, and differences between LIBOR, and other interest rate benchmarks and alternative reference rates may have a material adverse effect on financial markets and market participants, including us. Accordingly, we have taken, and are continuing to take, necessary steps to proactively address the transition and meet the industry-recommended and regulatory milestones, including developing internal systems and infrastructure to transition to alternative reference rates, as well as conducting outreach to inform our customers of the necessity to prepare for the cessation of LIBOR. Also, SMFG and major subsidiaries adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which came into effect on January 25, 2021.

However, we may face the risks that our actions to address the transition, including developing internal systems and infrastructure as well as customer outreach, may be delayed or may not be successful. Even if our actions are undertaken successfully, they may not be sufficient to address the transition and may lead to a negative impact on our customers. For example, our customers may consider that the advice and information that we prepare and provide is inadequate and/or inaccurate. Moreover, the valuation of certain of our financial assets and liabilities may change, and the inability of existing hedged and hedging transactions to meet the hedge relationship designation requirements could lead to an increase in profit and loss volatility. All of these could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For further details, see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Hedge Accounting—Interest Rate Benchmark Reform” and Note 7 “Derivative

Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting—Hedge accounting—Interest Rate Benchmark Reform” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Changes in the competitive and financial environment and financial systems could have a negative effect on the financial services industry and us.

Deregulation of the financial system, consolidation among financial institutions, diversification within the financial services industry, and the expanded presence of foreign financial institutions and investors have made the Japanese financial services market highly competitive. Moreover, competition in overseas markets has intensified due to global consolidation, convergence and alliances among financial institutions. In addition, the development of new technologies in the “Fintech” and other sectors, along with the corresponding rise of new entrants from these sectors into the financial services industry, may further intensify competition in the business environments in which we operate. We compete with various types of financial services companies, including:

 

banking groups, including Japan’s other major banking groups;

 

government-controlled and government-affiliated entities;

 

regional banking institutions;

 

major investment banks; and

 

non-bank financial institutions.institutions; and

other firms that are engaged in providing similar products and services.

Increased competition in Japan may put downward pressure on prices for our financial services, cause us to lose market share or require us to incur additional expenses in order to remain competitive. Internationally, various forms of financial support provided by foreign governments to foreign banks and other financial institutions may reduce the cost of capital to those institutions and otherwise give them competitive advantages. In addition, the development ofwith technological advances, new technologiescompetitors in the “Fintech” and other sectors, along with the corresponding rise of new entrants from these sectors into the financial services industry may further intensify competition in the business environments in which we operate,continue to emerge, and as a result, we may be forced to adapt our business to compete more effectively. There can be no assurance that we will be able to respond effectively to current or future competition.

The changesChanges in the financial environment in Japan may also have a negative effect on the Japanese financial services industry. For example, prolonged monetary easing by the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”)BOJ may continue to lower the domestic interest spreads. This may significantly affect the businesses of commercial banks in Japan, including us. For further information on the BOJ’s monetary policy measures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Factors Affecting Results of Operation.”

Adverse economic conditions and deterioration of the financial conditions of our customers could increase our credit costs.

Ournon-performing loans (“NPLs”) and credit costs for corporate and individual customers may increase significantly if:

 

domestic or global economic conditions worsen or do not improve;

 

our customers do not repay their loans, due to reasons including deterioration of their financial conditions; and

 

the value of collateral declines.

We have substantial exposure to corporate customers in the following sectors: real estate and goods rental and leasing, manufacturing, wholesale and retail, transportation, communications and public enterprises, wholesale and retail, and services, including electric utilities, and to individual customers mainly through housing loans. The financial

conditions of those customers may be subject to changes in the industry-specific economic conditions, including, for example, fluctuations in the prices of oil, gas and other natural resources, as well as general economic conditions. In addition, adverse region-specific economic conditions or changes in economic conditions due to unexpected incidents such as the spread of COVID-19 and collateral events could worsen our customers’ financial conditions or could decrease the value of our collateral provided to us in such regions. As a result, we may be required to record increases in our allowance for loan losses.

Moreover, for certain borrowers, we may choose to engage indebt-for-equity swaps or provide partial debt write-offs, additional financing or other forms of assistance as an alternative to exercising our full legal rights as a creditor if we believe that doing so may increase our ultimate recoverable amount of the loan. We may be required to, or choose to, provide new or additional financing to customers who may incur unexpected liabilities, have difficulty in the future in continuing operations, encounter difficulties or need to devote significant resources to repair their infrastructures, as a result of natural disasters or other calamities.

In addition, changes in laws or government policies may have an adverse impact on the rights of creditors. For example, the Government of Japan has provided or may provide in the future government guarantees and other government support measures in response to the financial crisis or other unexpected incidents such as widespread pandemics such as COVID-19,large-scale natural disasters and any subsequent collateral events. Even if our current or future loans to borrowers have received or will receive any government support measures, it is unclear to what extent those loans will benefit, directly or indirectly, from the current or any future government guarantees or support measures.

In addition, our NPLs may increase and there may be additional credit costs if we fail to accurately estimate the incurredexpected losses in our loan portfolio. These estimates require difficult, subjective and complex judgments such as credit evaluation of our borrowers, valuation of collateral and forecasts of economic conditions.

The ratio of impaired loans and advances to the total loans and advances, both net of allowance for loan losses, were 0.6%0.8%, 0.7%0.5% and 0.8%0.6% at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. For further information, see “Item 5.A. Operating Results— Financial Condition—Loans and Advances.”

A significant downgrade of our credit ratings could have a negative effect on us.

At the date of this annual report, the Company has the issuer ratings ofA1/P-1 from Moody’s Japan K.K., (“Moody’s”), the issuer credit rating ofA- from S&P Global Ratings Japan Inc. (“S&P”) and the foreign and local currency issuer default ratings of A/F1 from Fitch Ratings Japan Limited (“Fitch”).Limited. There can be no assurance that these ratings will be maintained.

A material downgrade of our credit ratings may have various effects including, but not limited to, the following:

 

we may have to accept less favorable terms in our transactions with counterparties, including capital raising activities, or may be unable to enter into certain transactions;

 

foreign regulatory bodies may impose restrictions on our overseas operations;

 

existing agreements or transactions may be cancelled; and

 

we may be required to provide additional collateral in connection with derivatives transactions.

Any of these or other effects of a downgrade of our credit ratings could have a negative impact on the profitability of our treasury and other operations, and could adversely affect our regulatory capital position, liquidity position, financial condition and results of operations. For more information about our credit ratings, see “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We face significant challenges in achieving the goals of our business strategy, and our business may not be successful.

In May 2017,2020, we announced a newour medium-term management plan through March 2020.2023. We believe that we have targeted appropriate business areas. However, our initiatives to offer new products and services and to increase sales of our existing products and services may not succeed if market conditions do not stabilize, market opportunities develop more slowly than expected, our initiatives have less potential than we envisioned originally or the profitability of these products and services is undermined by competitive pressures. Consequently, we may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability in our targeted business areas.

In order to implement our business strategy successfully, we need to hire and train qualified personnel continuously and in a proactive manner, as well as to attract and retain employees with professional experience and specialized product knowledge. However, we face competition from other commercial banks, investment banks, consumer finance companies and other financial services providers in hiring highly competent employees. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in attracting, integrating and retaining appropriately qualified personnel.

We are exposed to new risks as we expand our businesses, the range of our products and services, and geographic scope of our businesses overseas.

As part of our business strategies we have expanded and may continue to expand our businesses or our range of products and services beyond our core business, commercial banking. This could expose us to new risks, such as adverse regulatory changes, more competition or deterioration in the operating environments that affect those businesses, products and services. Some of those risks could be types with which we have no or only limited experience. As a result, our risk management systems may prove to be insufficient and may not be effective in all cases or to the degree required.

In accordance with our strategy to further increase our presence in the international financial markets, we may continue to expand the scale of our overseas businesses, especially in emerging economies, notably Asian countries and regions. The expansion of our overseas businesses may further increase our exposure to risks of adverse developments in foreign economies and markets, including interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk, regulatory risk and political risk. Our overseas expansion also exposes us to the compliance risks and the credit and market risks specific to the countries and regions in which we operate, including the risk of deteriorating conditions in the credit profile of overseas borrowers.

Failure of our business strategies through our subsidiaries, affiliates and other business alliance partners could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations, including impairment losses on goodwill or investments.

Aligned with our business strategies, we have made and may undertake acquisition of a subsidiary, investments in affiliates and other business alliance partners, and reorganization within SMBC Group companies. It is uncertain whether we will receive the expected benefits from those business strategies, due to any adverse regulatory changes, worsening of economic conditions, increased competition or other factors that may negatively affect the related business activities. Furthermore, unanticipated costs and liabilities may be incurred in connection with those business strategies, including liabilities from the claims related to the businesses prior to our business alliances, and cost from actions by regulatory authorities.

When we acquire a subsidiary, we may recognize goodwill and intangible assets. Impairment losses on goodwill or intangible assets in connection with acquisitions must be recognized when the recoverable amount of goodwill or intangible assets of the business is lower than the carrying amount at the time of impairment testing, which is performed annually or whenever there is an indication that the goodwill or intangible assets may be impaired.

We account for some of our investments in affiliates under the equity method. Therefore, net losses incurred by equity method investees may cause us to record our share of the net losses. Furthermore, we may lose the capital which we have invested in business alliances or may incur impairment losses on securities acquired in such alliances. We may also be required under contractual or other arrangements to provide financial support, including credit support and equity investments, to business alliance partners in the future. Additionally, we may also incur credit costs from our credit exposure to such partners.

We are exposed to the industry specific risks of the consumer finance industry.

Changes in the legal environment have severely and adversely affected the business performance of consumer lending and credit card companies. We have exposures to the risks specific to the consumer finance industry through our subsidiaries, including SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Finance Service”), formerly known as Cedyna Financial Corporation, (“Cedyna”) and SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Consumer Finance”).

Consumer lending and credit card companies had offered unsecured personal loans, which included loans withso-called “gray zone” interest in excess of the maximum rate prescribed by the Interest Rate Restriction Act (ranging from 15% to 20%) up to the 29.2% maximum rate permitted under the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates (“Contributions Act”). However, amendments to laws regulating moneylenders, which increased the authority of government regulators, prohibited gray zone interest and introduced an upper limit on aggregate credit extensions to an individual by moneylenders atone-third of the borrower’s annual income, were promulgated in 2006 and became fully effective in June 2010. After the promulgation of such amendments, Cedyna,SMBC Finance Service, SMBC Consumer Finance and other companies engaged in related business reduced their interest rates on loans in preparation for the prohibition of gray zone interest. As a consequence, margins earned by those companies, as well as the amounts of loans extended, decreased.

In addition, as a result of court decisions unfavorable to those companies, claims for refunds of amounts paid in excess of the applicable maximum allowed rate by the Interest Rate Restriction Act have increased substantially. Although Cedyna,SMBC Finance Service, SMBC Consumer Finance and other subsidiaries have each recorded a provision for claims for refunds of gray zone interest on loans, we may be required to recognize additional losses if such provisions are determined to be insufficient, and the additional losses could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Inability to generate sufficient future taxable profits or adverse changes to tax laws, regulatory requirements or accounting standards could have a negative impact on the recoverability of certain deferred tax assets.

We recognize deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the tax losses carried forward and the temporary differences can be utilized. The deferred tax assets are quantified on the basis of currently enacted tax rates and accounting standards and are subject to change as a result of future changes to tax laws or the rules for computing taxable profits and allowable losses. Failure to generate sufficient future taxable profits or changes in tax laws or accounting standards may reduce our estimated recoverable amount of net deferred tax assets. Such a reduction could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Declines in returns on our plan assets or revised actuarial assumptions for retirement benefits may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

SMBC and some of our other subsidiaries have various defined benefit plans. We have experienced in the past, and may experience in the future, declines in returns on plan assets and changes in the discount rates and

other actuarial assumptions. If returns on plan assets decrease, or if we revise the discount rates and other assumptions, the deficit of the impacted defined benefit plan may increase and adversely affect our financial

condition and results of operations. Because more thanapproximately half of our plan assets are composed of equity instruments, the plan assets are greatly affected by volatility in the prices of equity securities. Substantial declines in the prices for publicly traded Japanese stocks would negatively affect our plan assets. For further information, see Note 2324 “Retirement Benefits” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Our liquidity could be adversely affected by actual or perceived weaknesses in our businesses and by factors we cannot control, such as a general decline in the level of business activity in the financial services sector.

We need liquidity to maintain our lending activities, meet deposit withdrawals, pay our operating expenses and pay interest on and principal of debt and dividends on capital stock. Adverse market and economic conditions in the domestic and global economies may limit or adversely affect our access to liquidity required to operate our business. If our counterparties or the markets are reluctant to finance our operations due to factors including actual or perceived weaknesses in our businesses as a result of large losses, changes in our credit ratings, or a general decline in the level of business activity in the financial services sector, we may be unable to meet our payment obligations when they become due or only be able to meet them with funding obtained on unfavorable terms. Circumstances unrelated to our businesses and outside of our control, such as, but not limited to, adverse economic conditions, disruptions in the financial markets or negative developments concerning other financial institutions perceived to be comparable to us, may also limit or adversely affect our ability to replace maturing liabilities in a timely manner. Without sufficient liquidity, we will be forced to curtail our operations, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sales of our shares by us may have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares and may dilute existing shareholders.

We may issue shares from the unissued portion of our authorized share capital and sell shares held as treasury stock, generally without a shareholder vote. Sales of shares in the future may be at prices below prevailing market prices and may be dilutive.

Our business relies on our information technology systems, which are at risk of being damaged or failing as a result of various incidents including cyberattacks, and their failure could harm our relationships with customers or adversely affect our provision of services to customers.

In all aspects of our business, we use information technology systems to deliver services to and execute transactions on behalf of our customers as well as for back-office operations. We therefore depend on the capacity and reliability of the electronic and information technology systems supporting our operations. We may encounter service disruptions in the future, owing to failures of these information technology systems. Our information technology systems are at risk of being damaged or failing as a result of quality problems, human errors, natural disasters, power losses, sabotage, acts of terrorism, cyberattacks and similar events.

In particular, cybersecurity risks for financial institutions have significantly increased in recent years. This is partly because of the continuous introduction of new technologies and the use of the Internetinternet and telecommunications technologies as well as the elaboration of the cyberattacks, which include computer viruses, malicious code, phishing attacks or other security breaches. As we rely on information technology systems in our business and our receipt and handling of confidential personal information from our customers, any impairment, compromise or destruction of such systems may interfere with, or temporarily prevent us from, continuing our operations. In addition, we also face indirect cybersecurity risks relating to our customers and other third parties, including counterparties in the financial services industry. As a result of increasing consolidation, interdependence and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology failure or cyberattack could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including us. Any third-party

technology failure or cyberattack could adversely affect our ability to execute transactions or deliver services to our clients effectively. For example, vulnerabilities in third-party technology systems may be exploited in ways that increase the risk our information technology systems are exposed to cyberattacks.

Accordingly, we have taken steps to protect information technology systems from these risks, including by establishing data recovery capability and functionality, and to address all contingencies that could arise in the event of a major disruption of services. Particularly, we have adopted our “Declaration of Cyber Security Management” in order to further strengthen our cybersecurity capabilities. In this declaration, our management recognizes cybersecurity as a major management issue and takes a leadership role in implementing measures such as allocating appropriate resources based on discussions at the meetings of the Management Committee and the board of directors, establishing a special department and manual for emergencies and enhancing security measures for our services including internet banking services.

However, these measures may not be sufficient, especially considering the increasing frequency and sophistication of recent cyberattacks. In addition, we may not be prepared to address all contingencies that could arise in the event of a major disruption of services. The failure to address such contingencies could harm our relationships with customers or adversely affect our provision of services to customers.

We handle personal information obtained from our individual and corporate customers in relation to our banking, securities, consumer lending, credit card, asset management and other businesses. The systems we have implemented to protect the confidentiality of personal information, including those designed to meet the strict requirements of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, may not be effective in preventing disclosure of personal information by unauthorized access from a third party. Leakage of personal information could expose us to demands for compensation or lawsuits for ensuing economic losses or emotional distress, administrative actions or sanctions, additional expenses associated with making necessary changes to our systems and reputational harm. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Fraud, misconduct or other unlawful behavior by directors, officers and employees or third parties could subject us to losses and regulatory sanctions.

We are exposed to potential losses resulting from fraud, misconduct and other unlawful behavior by directors, officers and employees. Directors, officers and employees may bind us to transactions that exceed authorized limits or present unacceptable risks, hide from us and from our customers unauthorized activities, improperly use confidential information or otherwise abuse customer confidences. Third parties may engage in fraudulent activities, including fraudulent use of bank accounts or the use of false identities to open accounts for money laundering, tax evasion or other illegal purposes. Third parties could also use stolen or forged ATM cards, engage in credit card fraud or transfer funds illegally through online banking fraud, and we may be required to indemnify victims of such fraud for related losses. In the broad range of businesses in which we engage, fraud, misconduct and other unlawful behavior are difficult to prevent or detect. In addition, with or without actual fraud, misconduct and other unlawful behavior by directors, officers and employees, investigations, administrative actions or litigation could commence in relation to them. Furthermore, we may not be able to recover the losses caused by these activities, including possible deterioration of our reputation.

Transactions involving Iran and other countries and targets that are subject to U.S. or other financial sanctions may lead some potential customers and investors to avoid doing business with us or investing in our securities or may limit our business operations.

U.S. law generally prohibits or substantially restricts U.S. persons from doing business with countries, a regionregions and persons that are the subject of sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) or other agencies (“Restricted Targets” which include Iran, North Korea, Syria, Cuba and the Crimea region of Ukraine). Other applicable financial sanctions are administered by the Ministry of Finance of Japan and authorities in other countries.

We maintain a SMBC Group-wide policy designed to ensure compliance with U.S. and other applicable sanctions laws and regulations. Ournon-U.S. offices engage in transactions relating to the Restricted Targets in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. These activities include or have included remittance of Japanese yen with

respect to our customers’ export or import transactions, maintenance of correspondent banking accounts with Iranian banks, including the Central Bank of Iran, and the payment of fees in Japanese yen to certain Iranian banks in connection with performance bonds issued in the past by SMBC through thesesuch Iranian banks related to our customers’ projects in Iran. All such transactions were permissible under applicable laws and regulations at the times they were engaged in. SMBC has discontinued activities that have become impermissible as a result of changes in applicable laws and regulations. See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulation in the United States—Laws Prohibiting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing—U.S. Sanctions Targeting Iran Related Activities.” The performance bonds expired and have not been renewed, but SMBC continues to be obligated to pay certain fees to the Iranian banks. In addition, we maintain a representative office in Iran that mainly performs an information-collecting function and liaisingliaises withnon-designated Iranian financial institutions and non-SDN Iranian parties on behalf of ournon-U.S. offices.

We do not believe that our operations relating to the Restricted Targets materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. A limited number of potential violations of U.S. economic sanctions by SMBC have been identified and voluntarily disclosed to OFAC. These transactions resulted from the inherent limitation on information about underlying transactions that can be obtained in the course of normal banking operations, inadvertent operational errors, or from the lack of familiarity of some personnel of SMBC with the requirements of the relevant regulations in the past. We have continuously strengthened our SMBC Group-wide OFAC and other financial sanctions compliance program in an effort to prevent the recurrence of such potential violations. We settled some of the voluntarily disclosed potential violations with OFAC and the others were closed without a penalty. However, in light of the inadvertent nature of such potential violations and the degree to which our strengthened compliance program aims to mitigate the risk of potential violations, we do not believe that our settlement with OFAC, or any possible penalties that OFAC may impose with respect to the other potential violations that remain unsettled, will have a material impact on our reputation, financial condition or results of operations, or on the prices of our securities.

We are aware of initiatives by U.S. states and U.S. institutional investors, such as pension funds, to adopt laws, regulations or policies prohibiting transactions with or investment in, or requiring divestment from, entities engaged in certain business with Iran and other Restricted Targets. It is possible that such laws and initiatives may result in our inability to enter into transactions with those entities that are subject to such prohibitions or to retain or acquire such entities as customers or investors in our securities.

In recent years, the U.S. government implemented a number of sanctions targetingnon-U.S. persons for activities undertaken outside the United States (“secondary sanctions”) that involve specific sanctions targets or certain activities including, among other things, certain transactions related to Iran’s energy, petrochemical, shipping orand shipbuilding sectors. Pursuant to the July 14, 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (“JCPOA”) agreed to by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany and Iran, with the European Union, on January 16, 2016 (“Implementation Day”), the United States lifted U.S. nuclear-related secondary sanctions targeting Iran. Even after Implementation Day, certain secondary sanctions remained in effect, including those targeting significant transactions involving Iranian or Iran-related Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDNs”). However, on May 8,in 2018, President Trump announced that he was terminating the United States’States terminated its participation in the JCPOA. At November 5, 2018, following the conclusion of certain “wind-down” periods, all U.S. sanctions (both primary and secondary) that had been waived or lifted under the JCPOA have been re-imposedand thatare fully effective, and additional sanctions were put into place in 2019 and 2020. While the parties to the JCPOA have engaged in negotiations concerning a possible return to the agreement by the United States, as of June 29, 2021, all nuclear-related secondarysuch sanctions authorities targeting Iran would be reinstated after specified wind down periods.remain in effect. In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, SMBC intends to provide certain services, including settlement services in connection with customers’ trade transactions between Japan and Iran, to the extent that such activities are not targeted by remainingpermissible under U.S. secondary sanctions. For more details of

relevant laws and regulations, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in the United States—Laws Prohibiting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing.”

In addition, the U.S. government and authorities in other countries have enacted a series of Ukraine-related sanctions, including those under the U.S. Ukraine-Related Sanctions Regulations, the U.S. Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014, as amended, and “sectoral” sanctions on the financial, energy and defense sectors of the Russian economy.

The U.S. government has imposed targeted sanctions against individuals in China and Hong Kong pursuant to the Hong Kong Autonomy Act and Executive Order 13936, and has also imposed restrictions pursuant to Executive Order 13959, as amended, on transactions by U.S, persons in securities issued by or linked to certain Chinese companies determined to be associated with the Chinese military-industrial complex. Additionally, pursuant to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and Executive Order 13818, the U.S. government has sanctioned a number of Chinese entities and individuals in connection with China’s actions with respect to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (“Xinjiang”), and published an advisory warning U.S. and non-U.S. companies with supply chain exposure to Xinjiang of reputational, economic, and legal risks of involvement with entities that engage in human rights abuses, including but not limited to forced labor in the manufacture of goods intended for domestic and international distribution. While the sanctions imposed under these authorities to date have not materially impacted our business, it is possible that future sanctions may have a more significant effect on us.

In February 2021, in response to the coup in Burma, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, authorizing the imposition of targeted sanctions against individuals and entities in Burma. Pursuant to the order, OFAC has added to the SDN List a number of individuals involved in or supporting the coup, family members of such individuals, as well as a number of Burmese state-owned enterprises. If additional sanctions are imposed, it is possible that they could have an adverse impact on the operations of SMBC’s branch in Yangon or on our customers’ business involving entities in Burma.

The laws, regulations and sanctions referenced above or similar legislative or regulatory developments in the U.S., Japan or other jurisdictions where applicable, may further limit our business operations. If we were determined to have engaged in activities targeted by certain U.S. statutes, Executive Orders or regulations, we

could lose our ability to open or maintain correspondent or payable-through accounts with U.S. financial institutions, among other potential sanctions. In addition, depending on sociopolitical developments, even though we take measures designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, our reputation may suffer due to our association with the Restricted Targets. The above circumstances could have a significant adverse effect on our business or the prices of our securities.

Our business operations are exposed to risks of natural disasters, terrorism, pandemics and other calamities.

Our business operations are subject to the risks of natural disasters, terrorism, pandemics, blackouts, geopolitical incidents and other calamities, any of which could impair our business operations. Despite our preparation of operation manuals and other backup measures and procedures, such calamities could cause us to suspend operations and could adversely affect our businesses, financial condition and results of operations. Large-scale natural disasters such as the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 2011 and any subsequent collateral events, may adversely affect economic conditions in general, the financial conditions of our corporate and individual customers and stock market prices, or cause other negative effects, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations owing to, for example, an associated increase in the amount of credit-related costs or an increase in losses related to our holdings of securities.

We are exposed to risks associated with climate change, including the physical risks of climate change and risks from the transition to a decarbonized society.

Risks associated with climate change are subject to increasing societal, regulatory and political focus in Japan and globally. These risks include the physical risks of climate change and risks from the transition to a decarbonized society. In order to address these risks, we have begun efforts to strengthen our climate change scenario analysis and consider countermeasures at the management level. These proposed countermeasures are reported to the Management Committee and Risk Committee and reviewed by outside directors on the board of directors. However, these efforts may not be successful, and even if they are undertaken successfully, they may not be sufficient. In such a case, they may lead to an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Physical risks of climate change arise from a number of factors and relate to specific weather events including large-scale typhoons. Despite our preparation of operation manuals and other backup measures and procedures, a large-scale disaster due to extreme weather conditions damages our employeesand branches, interfering with our business continuity. Large-scale disasters could also adversely affect the financial conditions of our customers or the value of properties pledged as collateral, resulting in an increase in our credit costs. In addition, our operating income and values of assets held may decrease due to instability in financial markets, which could also adversely affect our ability to raise financing.

There are also risks from the transition to a decarbonized society. For example, due to changes in climate change policies, tightening of environmental regulations and technological innovation to address climate change, our customers in sectors that are deemed to contribute significantly to climate change may experience declines in the value of their assets (i.e., asset stranding). In addition, our customers’ financial condition and performance could suffer from increasing costs associated with climate change response measures, which could result in an increase in our credit costs.

Moreover, amid growing interest in initiatives related to the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) and Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”), if our efforts and disclosure regarding corporate social responsibility are viewed as insufficient, we could suffer from increased social criticism, which could adversely affect the market price of our shares and/or the environment for our capital raising activities. For further information, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Sustainability Management” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Management of Climate-related Risk.”

Our risk management policies and procedures may not adequately address unidentified or unanticipated risks.

WeOur business operations are exposedsubject to a variety of operational, legalvarious laws and regulations across the jurisdictions in which we do business. In addition, we face significant regulatory risks throughout our organization. Management of these risks requires,scrutiny and expectations with respect to, among other things, policiesgovernance, infrastructure, data and procedures to properly recordrisk management practices and verify large numbers of transactionscontrols.

We have implemented or enhanced SMBC Group-wide risk management programs and events. However, these policies and procedures may not be fully effective or sufficient.program oversight, including compliance risk management. We have also devoted significant resources to strengthening our risk management framework and the policies and procedures thereunder, and expect to continue doing so in the future. Nevertheless, particularly in light of the continuing evolution of our operations and expansion into new areas, our policies and procedures designed to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective.effective or sufficient.

Furthermore, management of risks requires, especially for compliance risk management, among other things, policies and procedures to properly record and verify large numbers of transactions and events, but deficiencies in the quality or effectiveness of our data gathering, analysis and validation processes could result in ineffective risk management practices and inaccurate reporting. Some of our methods of managing compliance risks are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior and thus may not accurately predict future risks. Violations

Ineffectiveness or insufficiency of our risk management may result in violations of laws including the Japanese antitrust and fair trade laws by us or by SMBC mayand/or failure to comply with regulatory and supervisory expectations with respect to our compliance function. As a consequence of such violations or failures, we could be subject to regulatory investigations, enforcement actions and legal proceedings, any of which could result in administrative sanctions. Furthermore, investigations, administrative actionssubstantial penalties, fines or litigation could commence in relationother sanctions and damage to violations, which may involve costs and may result in deterioration of our reputation.

Our business could be adversely affected by litigation and regulatory proceedings globally.

We conduct business in many locations in and outside of Japan. We face the risk of litigation and regulatory proceedings in connection with our operations. For example, if we engage in activities targeted by certain U.S. sanctions, this could result in the imposition of monetary penalties or other restrictions by the U.S. government against us. Lawsuits and regulatory actions may result in penalties or settlements of very large indeterminate amounts or limit our operations, and costs to defend either could be substantial. Moreover, SMBC and one of its subsidiaries contribute to financial benchmarks such as the Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate (“TIBOR”) and the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)LIBOR for certain specific currencies. These benchmarks are widely referenced in jurisdictions in which we operate and do not operate. We face or may face some investigations, litigation and regulatory proceedings, and an adverse regulatory decision, judgment or ruling, including in jurisdictions we do not operate in, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Damage to our reputation may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Maintaining our reputation is vital to our ability to attract and maintain customers, investors and employees. Our reputation could be damaged through a variety of circumstances, including, among others, fraud or other

misconduct or unlawful behavior by directors, officers or employees, systems failures, compliance failures, investigations, adverse litigation judgments or regulatory decisions, or unfavorable outcomes of governmental inspections. Negative media coverage ofAdverse publicity or negative information regarding Japan’s financial services industry or us that may be published or broadcast by the media or posted on social media, non-mainstream news services or other parts of the internet, even if inaccurate or not applicable to us, may have a materially adverse effect on our brand image and may undermine depositor confidence, thereby affecting our businesses and results of operations. For example, actual or rumored investigations of us or our directors, officers or employees, or actual or rumored litigation or regulatory proceedings, or media coverage of the same, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and could negatively affect the prices of our securities. Actions by the financial services industry generally or by certain members in the industry can also adversely affect customers’ confidence on the financial services industry. In addition, investors and other stakeholders have placed emphasis and focus on environmental and social issues, including climate change due to global warming and human rights violations in supply chains. Our reputation may be adversely impacted by negative perceptions of us and our operations in light of these environmental and social concerns, or if we are unable to meet stakeholder expectations in our efforts to address them. Such reputational harm could also lead to a decreased customer base, reduced revenues and higher operating costs.

Our failure to establish, maintain and apply adequate internal controls over financial reporting could negatively impact investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

In order to operate as a global financial institution, it is essential for us to have effective internal controls, corporate compliance functions, and accounting systems to manage our assets and operations.

As a New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)-listed company and a registrant with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), under section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 our management is required to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclose whether such internal controls are effective. Our independent registered public accounting firm has to conduct an audit to evaluate and then render an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (“FIEA”) also requires companies listed on a Japanese stock

exchange, such as us, to file, together with their annual securities reports required by the FIEA, audited internal control reports assessing the effectiveness of their internal controls over financial reporting.

We have established internal controls over financial reporting, as well as rules for evaluating those controls, in order to provide reasonable assurance of the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. However, these controls may not prevent or detect errors. Any evaluation of effectiveness toof future periods is subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. To the extent any issues are identified through the foregoing processes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve them in a timely manner or at all. If this occurs, our reputation may be damaged, which could lead to a decline in investor confidence in us.

Other Risks

It may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or our directors or senior management, or to enforce against us or those persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal or state securities laws.

We are a joint stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Japan. Almost all of our directors and senior management reside outside the United States. Many of our assets and the assets of these persons are located in Japan and elsewhere outside the United States. It may not be possible, therefore, for U.S. investors to affecteffect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce, against us or these persons, judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal or state securities laws. We believe that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Japan, in original actions or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of claims predicated solely upon the U.S. federal or state securities laws mainly because the Civil Execution Act of Japan requires Japanese courts to deny requests for the enforcement of judgments of foreign courts if foreign judgments fail to satisfy the requirements prescribed by the Civil Execution Act, including requirements that:

 

the jurisdiction of the foreign court be recognized under laws, regulations, treaties or conventions;

proper service of process be made on relevant defendants, or relevant defendants be given appropriate protection if such service is not received;

 

the judgment and proceedings of the foreign court not be repugnant to public policy as applied in Japan; and

 

there exist reciprocity as to the recognition by a court of the relevant foreign jurisdiction of a final judgment of a Japanese court.

Judgments obtained in U.S. courts, predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal or state securities laws, may not satisfy these requirements.

As a holder of our American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), you have fewer rights than a shareholder of record in our shareholder register because you must act through the depositary to exercise these rights.

The rights of our shareholders under Japanese law to take actions such as voting their shares, receiving dividends and distributions, bringing derivative actions, examining our accounting books and records and exercising appraisal rights are available only to our shareholders of record. Because the depositary, through its custodian, is the record holder of the shares underlying the ADSs, only the depositary can exercise shareholder rights relating to the deposited shares. ADS holders will not be able to directly bring a derivative action, examine our accounting books and records or exercise appraisal rights.

Pursuant to the deposit agreement among us, the depositary and the holders and beneficial owners of ADSs, the depositary will endeavor to exercise voting and other rights associated with shares underlying ADSs in

accordance with instructions given by ADS holders, and the depositary will also pay to ADS holders dividends and distributions collected from us. However, the depositary is permitted under the deposit agreement to exercise reasonable discretion in carrying out those instructions or in making distributions and is not liable for failure to carry out instructions or make distributions as long as it acts in good faith. Therefore, ADS holders may not be able to exercise voting or other rights associated with the shares underlying ADSs in the manner that they intend or may lose some or all of the value of dividends or distributions collected from us. Moreover, the deposit agreement may be amended or terminated by us and the depositary without any reason, or consent from or notice to ADS holders. As a result, ADS holders may not be able to exercise rights in connection with the deposited shares exercised in the way they wish or at all.

ADS holders are dependent on the depositary for certain communications from us. We send to the depositary most of our communications to ADS holders in Japanese. ADS holders may not receive all of our communications in the same manner as or on an equal basis with shareholders of record in our shareholder register.

 

Item 4.

Information on the Company

4.A.    HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

Legal and Commercial Name

Our legal name is Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. Our commercial name is Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group.

Date of Incorporation

We were established in December 2002.

Domicile and Legal Form

We are a joint stock corporation incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Japan. Our address is: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.,1-2, Marunouchi1-chome,Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo100-0005, Japan. Our telephone number is:+81-3-3282-8111.

History and Development

We were established in December 2002 as a holding company for the SMBC Group through a statutory share transfer (kabushiki-iten) of all of the outstanding equity securities of the former SMBC in exchange for our newly issued securities. Upon our formation and completion of the statutory share transfer, the former SMBC became our direct, wholly owned subsidiary. SMBC was established in March 2003 through the merger of the former SMBC with Wakashio Bank, which was established in 1996 as a subsidiary of Sakura Bank. The former SMBC was established in April 2001 through the merger of Sumitomo Bank and Sakura Bank, which was established through the merger of Taiyo Kobe Bank and Mitsui Bank in 1990. Mitsui and Sumitomo started their banking businesses in 1876 and 1895, respectively. The origins of both banking businesses can be traced back to the seventeenth century.

We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. In order to further enhance our solid corporate governance system, we transitioned to a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee on June 29, 2017. For further information, see “Item 6.C. Board Practices.”

Information Concerning the Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

In April 2016,November 2018, based on the agreement concerning the reorganization of our joint leasing partnership announced in March 2018, we transferred a portion of our shares of Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited (“SMFL”) acquired General Electric Company, a company jointly owned by us and Sumitomo Corporation (“GE”Sumitomo Corp”) group’s leasing business in Japan for ¥181 billion by acquiring a 100%, to SMFL. Upon the share transfer, our equity interest in GE Japan GK (“GE Japan”)SMFL decreased from 60% to 50% while Sumitomo

Corp’s equity interest increased from 40% to 50%. The acquired leasing business is comprised mainly of equipment/asset leasing, small-ticket leasing,As a result, SMFL ceased to be our consolidated subsidiary and automotive leasing. In September 2016, GE Japan changedbecame our joint venture, and its corporate name toconsolidated subsidiaries SMBC Aviation Capital Limited and SMFL Capital Company, Limited.Limited (“SMFL Capital Company”) became the SMBC Group’s equity-method investees. Subsequently, in January 2019, SMFL Capital Company was merged into SMFL.

Public Takeover Offers

Not applicable.

Available Information

The SEC maintains a website at https://www.sec.gov that contains reports and proxy information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Some of the information may also be found on our website at https://www.smfg.co.jp/english/.

4.B.    BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Overview

We are the holding company for the SMBC Group. The SMBC Group is comprised of SMBC, SMBC Trust Bank Ltd. (“SMBC Trust Bank”), SMFL, SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. (“SMBC Nikko Securities”), Sumitomo Mitsui Card Company, Limited (“Sumitomo Mitsui Card”), Cedyna Financial Corporation(“Cedyna”SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Finance Service”), SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Consumer Finance”), The Japan Research Institute, Limited (“The Japan Research Institute”), Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited (“SMAM”SMDAM”) and other subsidiaries and affiliates. We are one of the three largest financial groups in Japan and offer a diverse range of financial services, including commercial banking, leasing, securities, consumer finance and other services.

On April 1, 2017, we introduced SMBC Group-wide business units, which determine strategies for each customer segment across SMBC Group companies, to further enhance our capability to meet our customers’ diversified needs. In connection with the introduction of such business units, beginning with the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, we have also reorganized our business segments, which formerly consisted of Commercial Banking, Leasing, Securities and Consumer Finance, with the remaining operations recorded in Others, into Wholesale Business, Retail Business, International Business and Global Markets Business, with the remaining operations recorded in Head office account and others. See “Item 4.C. Organizational Structure.”

OnIn March 23, 2018, with the aim of enhancing our corporate group’s brand value, we announced that “SMBC” would be designated as our corporate group’s master brand from April 2018. In line with this change, our corporate group, which was formerly referred to as the “Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group” or its acronym “SMFG,” is now referred to as the “SMBC Group.” “Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group” continues to be used as the holding company’s name.

Management PhilosophyOur Mission, Vision and Values

Our SMBC Group-wide“Mission” is a universal guide for our group management philosophy isand positioned as follows:the anchor for our corporate action. We also set forth our “Vision” of the mid to long term goals and “Five Values” as the core values to be shared by all executives and employees.

On April 1, 2020, we made a revision of our Mission to add “We contribute to a sustainable society by addressing environmental and social issues” so that it reflects our commitment to fulfilling our social responsibilities by further enhancing our various initiatives, not only limited to financial services.

After the revision, our Mission, Vision and Five Values are as follows.

Mission

 

we

We grow and prosper together with our customers, by providing services of greater value to them;them.

 

we

We aim to maximize our shareholders’ value through the continuous growth of our business; andbusiness.

we

We create a work environment that encourages and rewards diligent and highly-motivated employees.

We contribute to a sustainable society by addressing environmental and social issues.

Vision

A trusted global solution provider committed to the growth of our customers and advancement of society.

Five Values

Integrity: As a professional, always act with sincerity and a high ethical standard.

Customer First: Always look at it from the customer’s point of view, and provide value based on their individual needs.

Proactive & Innovative: Embrace new ideas and perspectives, don’t be deterred by failure.

Speed & Quality: Differentiate ourselves through the speed and quality of our decision-making and service delivery.

Team “SMBC Group”: Respect and leverage the knowledge and diverse talent of our global organization, as a team.

Sustainability Management

The world is currently facing a range of environmental and social issues, for example, climate change due to global warming and human rights violations in supply chains. In response to these environmental and social challenges, the public and private sectors have implemented various initiatives aimed at realizing a sustainable society, with growing interest in the SDGs set by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015 and environment, social, and governance (“ESG”) investing.

We define sustainability as “creating a society in which today’s generation can enjoy economic prosperity and well-being, and pass it on to future generations,” and are promoting sustainability management under the Corporate Sustainability Committee, which is chaired by the Group Chief Executive Officer. In addition, in April 2021, we established the Chief Sustainability Officer (“CSuO”) position as part of the group CxO framework to oversee and promote the SMBC Group’s sustainability-related initiatives.

In September 2019, we signed the Principles for Responsible Banking, which were proposed by the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative as a framework for the sustainable banking system of the future.

In April 2020, we established the “SMBC Group Statement on Sustainability,” as the basic principles upon which our SMBC Group-wideefforts to realize a sustainable society will be based. To realize sustainability as well as to accelerate sustainability management, philosophy, we have also established “SMBC Group GREEN×GLOBE 2030,” a codeten-year plan toward 2030. It includes our external and internal initiatives such as promotion of conduct. Our code of conduct is designedfinance contributing to be a guideline for the conduct of our directors, officers and employees in the realization of our SMBC Group-wide management philosophy in all areas. Our codesustainability and enhancement of conduct isemployees’ awareness of sustainability. The key pillars of “SMBC Group GREEN×GLOBE 2030” are as follows:

 

Sustainability initiatives that are directed towards our customers/society;

Internal initiatives that contribute to sustainability management;

Enhance engagement with investors.

Based on the statement and plan, we are dedicated to our priority issues, focusing especially on the “Environment” as a corporate citizen that protects the green earth, as well as on the “Community” and the “Next generation” as a member of society.

Environment

The global environment is an important asset that is shared by all of humanity, regardless of region or age, and a healthy environment is prerequisite to the realization of a sustainable society. We are earnestly engaging with climate change and various other environmental issues. By helping resolve such issues through our business, we aim to ensure that we can pass on a healthy environment to future generations.

The imperative to address climate change concerns continues to grow especially since the adoption of the Paris Agreement. In October 2020, the Government of Japan announced a net-zero emissions goal for 2050, committing to achieving a transition toward a decarbonized society. Given these circumstances, we strive to increase shareholder value whilst also maintaining healthy relationshipsachieve greenhouse gas emissions reductions in line with customers, employeesthe goals of the Paris Agreement and other stakeholders. To give utmost considerationto support the activities of our clients contributing to the trust which people have intransition toward and realization of a decarbonized society.

On May 12, 2021, we announced “Reinforcing Efforts against Climate Change.” In the firm, to abide by all laws and regulations, to maintainreinforced efforts, climate change is recognized as a high ethical standard, and to act fairly and sincerely;

to continue improving our knowledge and capability and, at“Major Challenge” that spans the same time, to raise our productivitykey pillars of “SMBC Group GREEN×GLOBE 2030.” Also, in order to provide superior financial services at competitive prices;effectively pursue efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we aim to establish and publicly announce a detailed action plan.

In addition, we are disclosing our financing policies for businesses and sectors listed below, with a high risk of significantly impacting the environment or society. The policies are introduced in SMBC, SMBC Trust Bank, SMFL and SMBC Nikko Securities. We continue to engage with customers and various other stakeholders while constantly considering the need to revise our financing policies as necessitated by the operating environment. In May 2021, we revised our policy regarding coal-fired power plants so that finance for newly planned coal-fired power plants and the expansion of existing plants is not provided, effective from June 1, 2021.

Coal-fired power generation

 

to establish a top brand global financial group by understanding the needs of each customer and by providing valuable services which meet those needs;

Hydroelectric power generation

 

to be selective

Oil and focused in the implementationgas

Coal mining

Tobacco manufacturing

Nature conservation areas

Palm oil plantation development

Deforestation

Manufacturing of our business strategy, to definecluster bombs and develop the competitive advantages whichother weapons of destruction

Furthermore, we have overbeen supporting the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) since December 2017, and we are performing climate change scenario analyses and working together with customers to address the issues caused by climate change and help realize a decarbonized society. In August 2020, we issued our competitors and, by allocating managerial resources strategically to those businesses, to becomefirst “SMBC Group TCFD Report” which summarizes our approach on climate change.

Community

We understand that a top playercommunity where people in our selected markets;

to be creative, proactivesociety feel the connection, support and courageous in order to be insafety among each other is the essence of human life and economic activities. As a leading position in all business areas and always a step ahead of our competitors;

to build a strong organization based on market practice and sound principles whilst reflecting our diverse values. To delegate internal authority under an efficient and effective management system which facilitates speedy decision-making and execution; and

to support our business growth and the development of our employees by setting challenging targets within an evaluation and compensation framework which emphasizes their capabilities and achievements.

Environment

We recognize preservationresponsible member of the environment as one of our most important management objectivescommunity, we continue to make contributions to the society.

For example, we established the “GREEN×GLOBE Partners,” a community platform that aims to solve environmental and strivesocial issues. Through the platform, we work with customers to achieve harmony with the natural environment in our corporate activities.

Basic Philosophy Regarding the SMBC Group’s Environmental Activities

Recognizing the importance of realizingrealize a sustainable society by hosting seminars and facilitating the exchange of information concerning the environment and society, assisting participants in connecting with each other, and initiating projects that contribute to solving social issues.

Next Generation

Ensuring the sustainability of our society and economy amid the changing social environment will require the cultivation of human resources who can support society with the necessary knowledge and technologies. We are promoting sustainability by fostering the next-generation human resources and industries that will shape the society of the future together with us.

For example, we provide financial literacy education to a wide range of age groups, from children to adults, on topics such as managing household finances and loans and credit as a way to provide accurate knowledge about financial matters.

Management of Climate-related Risk

Climate-related risk refers to the risk of loss arising from climate change and is primarily divided into physical risks and transition risks. Physical risks consider how acute meteorological phenomenon and chronic climate change can directly damage physical assets or otherwise impact their value or productivity. The progress of global warming may lead to increase in acute natural disasters such as typhoons and floods, and chronic climate changes such as an increase in precipitation due to a rise in average temperature. Accordingly, there are risks that we become unable to continue our business operations due to a disaster that strikes our head office or branch offices and a risk of increased costs due to disaster countermeasures and damage restoration. In addition, there are risks such as an increase in our credit costs and a decrease in deposits associated with deterioration in customer performance and collateral damage due to natural disasters.

Transition risks consider how strengthening of policies and regulations and changes in technologies and markets can lead to changes in the value of assets, commodities and companies. The transition to a decarbonized society is resulting in a push for tighter regulations at the national and international levels, including stricter carbon emission targets and carbon tax schemes, and may also promote transformation in the industrial structure due to the introduction of new technologies and energy sources and changes in consumer preferences. An increase in carbon emission control costs and changes in the supply and demand balance for products and services cause deterioration in customer performance due to revenue decline and impairment of existing assets for some customers, and as a result, there is a risk of an increase in our credit costs. Furthermore, it may be necessary to review our business strategies such as our financing policy on sectors.

In addition, companies are required to take measures such as business model transformation and carbon emission reduction that are appropriate for a decarbonized society. Growing demand for disclosure from stakeholders and efforts to address climate change are becoming one of our most important tasks, we make continuousthe criteria for evaluation of companies. Lack of efforts to harmonize environmental preservationaddress climate change and pollution control with corporate activities,delays in orderresponding to supportdemand for information disclosure may lead to deterioration of our reputation, and, as a result, there is a risk of deterioration in our funding environment.

With the economyincreased importance and contributefocus on climate-related risk, we have continued to expand our governance of climate-related risk and integrate climate considerations into the priorities of our board of directors and senior management. For example, regular reports regarding our sustainability-related efforts, including climate-related efforts, are submitted to the betterment of society as a whole.

We and our principal SMBC Group companies have obtained ISO 14001 certification,Management Committee, Corporate Sustainability Committee, board of directors, and Risk Management Committee. Moreover, the international standard for environmental management systems. Every year we set environmental objectives which we systematically pursue through environmental activities based on a PDCA (Plan, Do, CheckCSuO position was established in April 2021 as part of the group CxO framework to oversee and Act) cycle. SMBC and some ofpromote all our other SMBC Group companies adopted “Principles for Financial Action towards a Sustainable Society” in October 2011, which have been set forth for the purposes of making environmental financing widely-known and improving the quality of environmental financing.sustainability-related initiatives.

In addition, we have identified climate change risk as one of our Credit Policy,Top Risks, which describes the universalare risks that threaten to significantly impact management, and basic philosophies, guidelinesconducted scenario analyses of transition and rules for credit operations, SMBC declares its policy of prohibiting credit for problematic loans in terms of public responsibility, or extending credit for loans which mayphysical risks while also introducing policies on businesses and sectors that are likely to have a significant negative impact on the global environment and to the society. For large-scale projects which may potentially exert a major impact on the environment and society, SMBC adopts the Equator Principles, a set of guidelines developed by private-sector financial institutions for managing environmental and social risk related to financing large-scale projects, and conducts environmental and social risk assessments.

SMBC has policies for specific sectors listed below, which may have environmental and social influences such as adverse impact on human rights and climate change. These

We will continue to enhance the policies, have been reflectedexpand the scope of its scenario analysis, and monitor other measures to strengthen our risk management framework. At the same time, we will reduce risks by supporting customers attempting to transition toward a decarbonized society. Additional information about our management of climate-related risk is available on our website (the contents of which are not incorporated by reference in our Credit Policy.this annual report).

Coal-fired power plants;

Palm oil plantation developments;

Deforestation;

Cluster munitions and other slaughter weapons manufacturing; and

Soil contamination and asbestos.

Description of Operations and Principal Activities

Wholesale Business Unit

The Wholesale Business Unit provides financing, investment management, risk hedging and settlement services as well as financialcomprehensive solutions primarily for corporate clients in Japan that respond to wide-ranging client needs in relation to financing, investment management, risk hedging, settlement, M&A and other advisory services, digital services and leasing, primarily forlarge-andmid-sized corporate clients in Japan.leasing. This business unit mainly consists of the wholesale businesses of SMBC, SMBC Trust Bank, SMFL, SMBC Nikko Securities, Sumitomo Mitsui Card and SMBC Trust Bank and SMFL.Finance Service, which changed its corporate name from Cedyna Financial Corporation upon merger with former SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd. on July 1, 2020.

Financing and Investment Management

The Wholesale Business Unit provides financing services that include bilateral loans, syndicated loans, commitment lines, structured finance, project finance, nonrecourse loans to and investments in corporate customers directly or through private equity funds, securitization, debt and equity underwriting and corporate bond trustee and registrar services.

The Wholesale Business Unit also provides investment management services such as deposits and investment trusts. In addition, this business unit offers a wide range of securities products including structured bonds and subordinated bonds to corporate clients through SMBC and SMBC Nikko Securities.

Risk Hedging

The Wholesale Business Unit provides various risk hedging services including forward exchange contracts and derivatives to meet our customers’ demand for hedging risks such as interest rate risk or foreign exchange rate risk in their transactions. This business unit also provides guarantee services includingstand-by credit, performance bond and credit guarantee services.

Settlement

The Wholesale Business Unit offers a variety of products and services including remittance, cash management, trade finance for export and import activities and supply chain finance to optimize customers’ cash flows and business flows.

M&A and Other Advisory Services

The Wholesale Business Unit responds to customers’ diversifying business strategies and management issues by providing solutions custom-tailored to their business characteristics and growth stage.

The Wholesale Business Unit caters to large corporate clients in their global business activities by leveraging the collective strength of SMBC Group companies. For example, SMBC and SMBC Nikko Securities support the entire deal process of cross-border M&A projects on a collaborative basis.

Formid-sized companies and small and medium-sized enterprises, the Wholesale Business Unit provides a wide range of financial services including direct investment, LBO financing, debt restructuring, support for initial public offering and M&A advisory to enhance our customers’ corporate value, working in conjunction with private equity funds as necessary. In real estate and related businesses, this business unit provides a full lineup of services including brokerage and asset management by SMBC Trust Bank and funding support mainly by SMBC.

Forstart-up companies, the Wholesale Business Unit offers support in accordance with clients’ stage of growth such as management consulting, venture investment, financing and support for initial public offerings.

For clients considering business overseas, the Wholesale Business Unit provides tailored information on local laws and regulations and on Japanese companies already present in target countries. For clients who already have business overseas, each SMBC Group company collaborates to provide high quality solutions in areas such as business expansion and reorganization.

Digital Services

The Wholesale Business Unit supports customers’ digitalization and new business creation efforts. For example, this business unit provides convenient digital services by enhancing collaboration between digital-related services by the SMBC Group companies, such as robotic process automation and electronic contract services. In addition, this business unit launched a corporate digital platform which delivers a diverse range of financial and non-financial services including those of external partners.

Leasing

The Wholesale Business Unit provides a wide range of leasing services including equipment, operating and leveraged leasing mainly through SMFL. SMFL, is one of the major leasing companies in Japan. We have a 60%50% equity interest in SMFL while the remaining 40%50% is held by Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo Corp”),Corp, anon-affiliate.non-affiliate,

On April 1, 2016, which makes SMFL acquired GE group’s leasing business in Japan by acquiring a 100% equity interest in GE Japan. The acquired leasing business is comprised mainly of equipment/asset leasing, small-ticket leasing and automotive leasing. On September 5, 2016, GE Japan changed its corporate name to SMFL Capital Company, Limited.

We announced on November 6, 2017 that we had entered into a basic agreementour joint venture with Sumitomo CorpCorp.

SMFL had previously been our subsidiary, in which we held a 60% equity interest. In November 2018, based on the agreement concerning the reorganization of our joint leasing partnership and concluded onannounced in March 30, 2018, the final agreement regarding the reorganization, subject to the approval of foreign and domestic regulatory authorities. The completion of the reorganization is tentatively scheduled from November 2018 to January 2019. In this reorganization, we will transfertransferred a portion of our shares of SMFL, a company jointly owned by us and Sumitomo Corp, to SMFL. FollowingUpon the share transfer, our equity interest in SMFL will decreasedecreased from the current 60% to 50% while Sumitomo Corp’s equity interest will increaseincreased from 40% to 50%. As a result, SMFL will ceaseceased to be our consolidated subsidiary and will becomebecame our joint venture, and its consolidated subsidiaries SMBC Aviation Capital Limited, which belongs to the InternationalGlobal Business Unit, and SMFL Capital Company Limited will becomebecame our equity methodequity-method investees. Subsequently, in January 2019, SMFL Capital Company Limited will bewas merged into SMFL.

Retail Business Unit

The Retail Business Unit provides financial services to both consumers residing in Japan and domesticsmall-sized companies and mainly consists of the retail businesses of SMBC, SMBC Nikko SecuritiesTrust Bank and SMBC Trust BankNikko Securities, together with three consumer finance companies, Sumitomo Mitsui Card, CedynaSMBC Finance Service and SMBC Consumer Finance.

This business unit offers a wide range of products and services for consumers, including wealth management services, settlement services, consumer finance and housing loans, in order to address the financial needs of all individual customers.

Wealth Management

The Retail Business Unit offers a variety of wealth management services to high-net-worth customers as well as customers with needs for asset building in the mass affluent and mass segments. The financial products and services including personal bank accounts,that this business unit offers include deposit products such as ordinary deposits, time deposits and foreign currency deposits, investment trusts, equities, bonds, insurance products and trust equity, bond and insurance products.services.

In addition,order to meet high-net-worth customers’ diverse needs for asset management, including asset succession, SMBC, SMBC Trust Bank and SMBC Nikko Securities are promoting greater collaboration in order to meet customers’ diverse needs for asset management by leveraging their respective strengths of aSMBC’s broad client base and a high advisory capability.

On January 1, 2018, SMBC Nikko Securities merged with SMBC Friend Securities Co., Ltd., which had been our wholly owned subsidiary. This merger was made for the purposecapabilities of strengthening our securities business by reinforcing consulting-type sales, enhancing productivity through the optimization of sales personnel staffing and achieving cost saving synergies through the consolidation of overlapping management infrastructure.

In addition, the Retail Business Unit, through SMBC Trust Bank offers extensive trust services tailoredand SMBC Nikko Securities. In addition, we are appointing dedicated staff to the needs ofhigh-net-worth customers such as wealth management solutions.

In November 2015, SMBC Trust Bank acquired the retail banking business of Citibank Japan Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. This acquisition was made for the purpose of expanding our business model to offer additional productsgive them access to outstanding advice and services to our customers, including foreign currency investment products and global services.service.

Settlement

The Retail Business Unit conducts credit card, installment and solution businesses and provides customers with secure and convenient payment methods.

In the credit card business, Sumitomo Mitsui Card and CedynaSMBC Finance Service conduct a comprehensive credit card business with a strong brand, and offer a variety of settlement and finance services to meet diverse customer needs.

Sumitomo Mitsui Card is a leading company in Japan’s credit card industry, having introduced the Visa brand into the Japanese market. We, Sumitomo Mitsui Card, SMBCmarket, and NTT DoCoMo, Inc. (“NTT DoCoMo”) formed a strategic business and capital alliance in credit payment service. We have a 66% equity interest in Sumitomo Mitsui Card, while the remaining 34% is held by NTT DoCoMo. Pursuant to the alliance, Sumitomo Mitsui Card offers a credit payment service using NTT DoCoMo’s mobile phones equipped with contactless IC chips. In addition, Sumitomo Mitsui Card issues a variety of affiliated credit cards in cooperation with partners including, but not limited to, railway companies, airline companies, department stores and online retailers to satisfy both these partners’ and cardholders’ needs.

CedynaSMBC Finance Service conducts credit card, installment (such as shopping credit and automobile loan) and solution (such as collection outsourcing and factoring) businesses. On

We, Sumitomo Mitsui Card, SMBC and NTT DoCoMo, Inc. (“NTT DoCoMo”) formed a strategic business and capital alliance in credit payment services in 2005. In September 2018, we entered into an agreement for new business cooperation with NTT DoCoMo to further expand credit payment services and explore new ways of collaboration in areas such as FinTech. Based on this agreement, we acquired an additional 34% of the outstanding shares of Sumitomo Mitsui Card from NTT DoCoMo and, as a result, our equity interest in Sumitomo Mitsui Card increased from 66% to 100% on April 1, 2016,2019. Simultaneously, we made SMBC Finance Service, formerly known as Cedyna, merged with SAKURA CARD CO., LTD., which had been oura subsidiary of Sumitomo Mitsui Card, in order to provide comprehensive solutions that benefit both the business operators and engaged in the credit card business, to further enhance its capability to meet the wide range of customer needs and deliver higher value-added products and services.

end-users.SMBC, Sumitomo Mitsui Card and CedynaSMBC Finance Service are leveraging their strengths to address cashless payment needs and integrate marketing and business operations.

Sumitomo Mitsui Card, together with GMO Payment Gateway, Inc. and Visa Worldwide Japan, Co., Ltd., has built a next-generation payment platform for business operators, and commenced full operations in October 2019. It provides a one-stop solution combining payment systems of real and online stores, and also integrates the payment center that processes the payment data and the network that delivers the processed payment data to each business operator.

Consumer Finance

The Retail Business Unit offers a variety of consumer loan products including unsecured card loan products mainly through SMBC and SMBC Consumer Finance to meet the wide range of individual customers’ demand for funds. Also, SMBC Consumer Finance guarantees certain consumer loans made by SMBC and other financial institutions.

In addition, SMBC and SMBC Mobit Co., LTD., (“SMBC Mobit”) which is a wholly owned subsidiary of SMBC Consumer Finance engaged in the card loan business, are strengthening their partnership. For example, a loan card from SMBC Mobit can be applied for or received through automated contract machines in SMBC branch offices.

Furthermore, SMM Auto Finance, Inc. (“SMMAF”), which became a subsidiary of SMBC in April 2008, is a provider of automobile sales financing services. However, in July 2019, SMBC sold its shares of SMMAF and as a result, SMMAF is no longer our subsidiary.

Housing Loans

The Retail Business Unit provides housing loans with a variety of terms and interest rates, including fixed-rate loans with2- to35-year terms, to meet diversified customer needs. As an example of a product addressing a specific customer need, this business unit offers a housing loan combined with an insurance policy that covers the repayment of the outstanding loan balance in the event the borrower is diagnosed with certain diseases. Housing loans are principally secured by collateral or supported by guarantees.

The Retail Business Unit operations are mainly conducted through a large and well developed branch network. We had a domestic network consisting of 441452 SMBC branch offices, 2646 SMBC Trust Bank branch offices, 148129 SMBC Nikko Securities branch offices and 959825 SMBC Consumer Finance staffed and unstaffed branch offices at March 31, 2018.2021. Some SMBC branches provide financial consultingconsultation services for asset management and housing loans during extended hours, including weekday evenings, weekends and national holidays, for the convenience of individual customers.

The Retail Business Unit also operates an extensive network of ATMs in Japan. At March 31, 2018, SMBC offers its customers’ access to 56,012 ATMs, some of which are SMBC’s ATMs and the majority of which are ATMs made available through arrangements with other ATM providers such as convenience store chains. At March 31, 2021, the number of SMBC’s ATMs was 4,558. In addition, SMBC Consumer Finance offers its customers’ access to 1,9671,692 automatic contract machines and ATMs at March 31, 2018.2021.

This business unit also offers internet banking services for consumers. At March 31, 2018,2021, SMBC’s internet banking services had approximately 1618 million registered users. The users are able to transfer funds, perform balance inquiries, make time deposits and foreign currency deposits, and buy and sell investment trusts over the internet as well as over mobile phoneswith smartphones and traditional telephones.computers.

Moreover, in credit card business, there are approximately 27 million and 1650 million card holders of Sumitomo Mitsui Card and CedynaSMBC Finance Service at March 31, 2018.2021.

The Retail Business Unit is implementing an initiative to supply customers with convenientfurther enhance its simple andeasy-to-use services efficient administrative operations by utilizing digital technologies and expand consulting space for individual clients at SMBC branches, while pushing ahead with digitalization of administrative processes and the transfer of administrative functions of branches to administration centers. These reforms will enable uscenters, and over-the-counter consultation functions through the combination of full-service branches and branches specialized in individual consultation. With this initiative, we aim to reduce costs while providing customers with convenient and high quality services.

The Retail Business Unit promotes digitalization in a variety of areas, including apromotion of use of debit card offeringcards and credit cards that addressesaddress cashless payment needs, a smartphone application that allows our customers to easily and seamlessly view information on transactions with SMBC SMBC Nikko Securities and Sumitomo Mitsui Card, and an automated chat service utilizing artificial intelligence and a biometric authentication platform.

This business unit also provides private banking and asset succession consulting forhigh-net-worth individuals.

Forsmall-sized companies, this business unit provides a wide array of financial products and services to comprehensively address business owners’ needs as both corporate managers and individuals such as business and asset succession.intelligence.

InternationalGlobal Business Unit

The Global Business Unit, which was renamed from the International Business Unit on April 1, 2020, supports the global businesses of a diverse range of clients, such as Japanese companies operating overseas,non-Japanese companies, financial institutions and government agencies and public corporations of various countries. This business unit mainly consists of the international businesses of SMBC, SMBC Nikko Securities, SMBC Trust Bank, SMFL, SMBC Nikko Securities and their foreign subsidiaries. At March 31, 2018,2021, we have global network of 129 offices in 40 countries and regions.148 overseas offices.

Banking Business

The InternationalGlobal Business Unit provides a variety of tailored products and services to meet customer and market requirements, including loans, deposits, clearing services, trade finance, project finance, loan syndication, derivatives and global cash management services.

At March 31, 2018, SMBC’s international network consistedIn January 2019, PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk, previously an associate bank of 18 branches, 22sub-branchesSMBC in Indonesia, became our consolidated subsidiary upon the purchase of additional shares by SMBC. Subsequently, in February 2019, PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk merged with PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsui Indonesia, a consolidated subsidiary of SMBC also in Indonesia, and 4 representative officesthe merged company changed its corporate name to PT Bank BTPN Tbk. This merger was made for the purpose of operating a full-fledged commercial banking business in Indonesia that serves both the wholesale and retail segments and further developing our franchise to offer broader financial services to our customers.

In April 2019, we commenced full operations of SMBC Bank EU AG, a banking subsidiary established in Germany, to retain our ability to respond flexibly to changes in the political and economic environment in Europe, including the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. Through SMBC Bank EU AG and our other existing networks, we continue to provide clients with sustained and stable financial services while expanding the range of our services.

SMBC seeks to meet customers’ needs globally, together with the network of SMBC’s foreign banking subsidiaries such as SMBC Bank International plc, which changed its corporate name from Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited with 7 offices andin October 2020, SMBC Bank EU AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (China) Limited, with 16 officesPT Bank BTPN Tbk and foreign banking associates, including PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk, The Bank of East Asia, Limited, ACLEDA Bank Plc. and Vietnam Export Import Commercial Joint Stock Bank.

Securities Business

In overseas markets, the InternationalGlobal Business Unit provides services such as underwriting activities, Japanese stockbrokingstock brokerage and M&A advisory through SMBC Nikko Capital Markets Limited and SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc., which are subsidiaries of SMBC in the United Kingdom and the United States respectively. In addition, this business unit provides services such as underwriting activities and Japanese stockbrokingstock brokerage through SMBC Nikko Capital Markets Europe GmbH, Japanese stock brokerage and M&A advisory services through SMBC Nikko Securities (Hong Kong) Limited and SMBC Nikko Securities (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., and M&A advisory related services through SMBC Nikko Investment Consulting (Shanghai) Limited. Together with other SMBC Nikko Securities’ subsidiaries and affiliates, this business unit offers high quality financial services to clients on a global basis.

Leasing Business

The InternationalGlobal Business Unit provides a variety of leasing services related to the construction machinery, transportation equipment, industrial machinery, medical equipment and other categories mainly through SMFL’s offices overseas. This business unit also offers aircraft leasing services through SMBC Aviation Capital Limited, a subsidiary of SMFL, and railcar leasing services through SMBC Rail Services LLC, which is a railcar operating leasing company and a subsidiary of SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc.

For detailed information on the reorganization of our joint leasing partnership, see “Wholesale Business Unit—Leasing” in this section.

On June 1, 2017, we, through SMBC Rail Services LLC, acquired all membership interests of American Railcar Leasing LLC, one of the leading railcar leasing companies in the United States. We pursued this acquisition based on our expectation that railcar leasing business in the United States will experience further growth and high profitability due to stable demand for rail freight transportation, which is the core infrastructure for inland logistics. Through this acquisition, we aim to expand our railcar leasing business and services by further enhancing our fleet portfolio to appropriately meet diverse needs of clients in a wide range of industries.

Global Markets Business Unit

The Global Markets Business Unit offers solutions through foreign exchange products, derivatives, bonds, stocks and other marketable financial products and also undertakes asset liability management operations, which help comprehensively control balance sheet liquidity risks and interest rate risks. This business unit consists of the Treasury Unit of SMBC and the Product Unitglobal markets businesses of SMBC Nikko Securities.

Asset Liability Management and Portfolio Management

The Global Markets Business Unit maintains high profitability and stability by establishing a portfolio with highly liquid products and focusing on products for which investment appetite is high, and by carrying out portfolio rebalancing in a nimble and dynamic manner in response to changes in market conditions.

Foreign Currency Funding

To support our overseas businesses, this business unit strives to improve the stability of our foreign currency funding by diversifying funding methods and expanding the scope of investors we target. At the same time, this business unit keeps appropriate control of the balance sheet in response to international financial regulations.

Sales and Trading

The Global Markets Business Unit provides detailed information on market conditions and economic trends to address customers’ hedging and asset management needs, expands its product lineup in foreign exchange, derivative, bond, stock and other products and supplies timely solutions to increase customer satisfaction and SMBC Group earnings.

In addition, this business unit encourages the use of electronic transactions such as its electronic foreign exchange execution platform available via the Internetinternet to respond to the needs of a wider range of customers.

Other Major Business

System Development, Data Processing, Management Consulting and Economic Research

We provide financial consultation services relating to management reforms, IT, the planning and development of strategic information systems and outsourcing. We also conduct diverse activities including domestic and international economic research and analysis, policy recommendations and business incubation. We offer these services mainly through The Japan Research Institute.

Asset Management

We engage in the investment advisory and investment trust management businesses.

On July 29, 2016,In April 2019, Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management (“SMAM”), our subsidiary, merged with Daiwa SB Investments Ltd. (“DSBI”), previously our associate, to form SMDAM. Our equity interest in SMDAM resulting from the merger is 50.1%, and as such, SMDAM is our subsidiary. Through the merger, we acquiredaim to establish an additional 20% ofasset management company that combines the outstanding sharesstrengths and expertise of SMAM and increased our equity interestDSBI, and offers high quality investment management performance and services in SMAMorder to 60%. As a result, SMAM, our former associate,properly address client needs.

Others

Kansai Mirai Financial Group, Inc. (“Kansai Mirai Financial Group”), which became our subsidiary. On May 11, 2018, we announced that we had concluded a memorandum of understanding regarding a merger of SMAM and Daiwa SB Investments Ltd., our associate in April 2019, subject to the approval of regulatory authorities. We expect the merged company to enhance its investment management capabilities and business foundations, in addition to expanding the scale of its operations. The merged company is scheduled to become our subsidiary.

Others

Our associates Kansai Urban Banking Corporation (“KUBC”) and THE MINATO BANK, LTD. (“The Minato Bank”) engage2018, engages in commercial banking business in Kansai area.

In March 2017, However, in December 2020, we announced our plan to integrate KUBC, The Minato Bank and The Kinki Osaka Bank, Ltd., which issold a regional financial institution based in Kansai area and a wholly owned subsidiary of Resona Holdings, Inc. (“Resona Holdings”), a financial holding company head quartered in Japan. In September 2017, we executed a business integration agreement in connection with the plan. As part of this business integration, KUBC and The Minato Bank ceased to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates. In addition, through a series of transactions including share exchanges effected in April 2018, the three banks became wholly owned subsidiariesshares of Kansai Mirai Financial Group Inc., an intermediate holding company established by Resona Holdings, and as a result, Kansai Mirai Financial Group Inc. became our equity-method associate.

Credit Loss Protection Agreement with Goldman Sachs

To expand its overseas portfolio and revenue, SMBC entered into agreements with Goldman Sachs in 2003 to provide credit protection to Goldman Sachs’ extension of credit to their investment grade clients in exchange for receiving a proportion of the fees and interest income from the borrowers. In connection with the agreements, Goldman Sachs established certain wholly owned subsidiaries (“William Street Entities”) that might make credit commitments and extensions. Goldman Sachs entered into credit loss protection arrangements with SMBC in order to hedge in part the credit risk to its investment in the William Street Entities. SMBC, through its Cayman Islands branch, would issue letters of credit in exchange for fees equal to a portion of the fees and interest to be paid by the borrowers to the William Street Entities. The first letter of credit (“FLC”), was issued in 2003 in a maximum available amount of $1 billion, and is available over a20-year period, subject to early termination or extension. Also, from time to time over a20-year period, subject to early termination or extension and other conditions, upon the request of Goldman Sachs, SMBC has issued letters of credit and may issue one or more additional letters of credit (each a second letter of credit (“SLC Series”) exposing SMBC to risk rated BBB/Baa2 or higher in an aggregate maximum available amount of $1.125 billion). Goldman Sachs may draw on the letters of credit in the event that Goldman Sachs realizes certain losses (“Specified Losses”), with respect to loan commitments or loans extended thereunder that Goldman Sachs has entered into with specified borrowers approved by SMBC and Goldman Sachs.

Under the FLC, Goldman Sachs is entitled to draw from time to time amounts equal to approximately 95% of Specified Losses, up to an aggregate stated amount of $1 billion. Under the SLC Series, Goldman Sachs is entitled, subject to certain conditions, to draw from time to time amounts equal to approximately 70% of Specified Losses above specified loss thresholds, up to an aggregate stated amount of $1.125 billion. Goldman Sachs has made a small number of drawdowns under the FLC in accordance with its terms.

In connection with these credit arrangements, SMBC pays Goldman Sachs an administration fee based on the aggregate amount of commitments covered by the FLC.

The credit loss protection arrangements contain a number of provisions that give SMBC some control over the determination of borrowers to which it has potential exposure under the FLC and any SLC Series:

Goldman Sachs may make credit commitments covered by the arrangements only to borrowers approved by SMBC.

Unless SMBC and Goldman Sachs agree otherwise, the borrowers covered by the FLC and any SLC Series that are rated by both of the two major rating agencies must be rated investment grade by at least one, and borrowers that are rated only by one of the two major rating agencies must be rated investment grade by that rating agency. If neither of the two major rating agencies rates a borrower, then further credit to the borrower shall no longer be covered by the FLC or any SLC Series, if SMBC and Goldman Sachs determine the borrower’s credit conditions are lower than investment grade.

If the ratings of an approved borrower fall below investment grade in the judgment of both major rating agencies (or, if a borrower is rated investment grade by only one agency, and that agency downgrades the borrower below investment grade), further credit to that borrower will no longer be covered by these arrangements, unless SMBC and Goldman Sachs otherwise agree.

SMBC, through a separate bankruptcy-remote Cayman Islands subsidiary, has collateralized the obligations on the FLC and a portion of the SLC Series by buying $1.505 billion of Goldman Sachs demand notes and pledging those demand notes to Goldman Sachs. If Goldman Sachs activates an SLC Series that is not collateralized, SMBC through its Cayman Islands subsidiary will be required to purchase and pledge additional Goldman Sachs demand notes with a principal amount equal to the stated amount of that SLC Series. Subject to certain conditions, SMBC has the right to substitute as collateral high quality liquid securities for the Goldman Sachs demand notes.

These arrangements are designed to collateralize SMBC’s obligations in the event SMBC’s Cayman Islands branch fails to perform on the FLC or any SLC Series, including as a result of our insolvency or the insolvency of SMBC or SMBC’s Cayman Islands branch.

If Goldman Sachs’ credit rating, as determined by either of the two major credit rating agencies, falls below investment grade, Goldman Sachs is obligated to provide collateral to SMBC to support Goldman Sachs’ obligations under the Goldman Sachs demand notes. As an initial15-year period under the letters of credit lapsed in February 2018, SMBC and Goldman Sachs have been able to negotiate in good faith to extend the terms of the letter of credit arrangements for one additional five-year term taking it up to 25 years. Before the expiration of the initial20-year term, in certain circumstances, the letter of credit arrangements with SMBC may be terminated by SMBC or Goldman Sachs, in which event Goldman Sachs would be obligated to prepay any outstanding demand notes. In circumstances related primarily to the creditworthiness of SMBC or a breach of its representations or covenants, Goldman Sachs may draw on the letters of credit for early termination amounts of up to the remaining undrawn or available amount on the letters of credit. In connection with draws on the letters of credit of early termination amounts, Goldman Sachs would have to prepay any outstanding demand notes. Goldman Sachs also would be obligated to pay SMBC on the originally scheduled expiration date of the letter of credit arrangements an amount equal to the early termination amounts minus the losses that would have been reimbursed under the letters of credit had they not terminated early.associate.

Management Policies

On May 15, 2017,2020, we announced our new medium-term management plan “SMFG Next Stage” (currently “SMBC Group Next Stage”), for the three-yearsthree years through March 2020. By combining2023. In the SMBC Group’s strengths with more focused businessmedium-term management plan, we aim to bepursue a major reform of our business model and explore new businesses to overcome the financial institutiondynamic change of choicethe business environment. Thereby, we aim at providing solutions for the problems and challenges of our customers to achieveand society and pursue sustainable growth andin order to further enhance our corporate value through the provision of products and services that add value to our customers. value.

Under the medium-term management plan, we have established the following three core policiespolicies: “Transformation” and “Growth” for business strategy and “Quality” for management base, in order to achieve sustainable growth and reachmake an important step towards the next stagerealization of our journey towards our vision for the next decadenew Vision of becoming “a“A trusted global financial group that, by earningsolution provider committed to the highest trustgrowth of our customers leads the growthand advancement of Japan and the Asian region.society.

DisciplinedTransformation: Transform existing businesses

We aim to improve profitability and efficiency by engaging in business managementmodel transformation and structural cost reform among major business areas while ensuring strategic resource allocation.

WithSpecifically, mainly in the environment for financial institutions expected to remain challenging,domestic business, we aim to focus on capital,rebuild the business franchise and perform strategic reallocation of resources corresponding to the market potential and pursue the improvement of both our service quality and business productivity through branch reorganization, digitalization, and streamlining of our business administration. Furthermore, in business areas where there is growth potential, we aim to enhance our capability of providing high-quality solutions to our customers and strengthen competitiveness of our products and services by restructuring the business model and organizational structure to maximally leverage our group capability.

Growth: Seek new growth opportunities

We aim to explore new growth opportunities including non-financial business fields and generate new added value by making investments for the future to increase our profit base.

Specifically, we aim to (a) strengthen asset-light businesses such as asset management and cost efficienciespayment/transaction in response to grow our bottom-line profit in a sustainable manner, in other words to become a profitable financial institution through sustained discipline.

While maintaining our competitivenessthe structural change in the stable domesticfinancial market, we intend to allocate resources across our portfolio of businesses in order to prioritize business fields which enhance capital efficiency. In addition, as risk-weighted assets are expected to increase on the back of tightening of international financial regulations, we intend to further strengthen control of our risk-weighted assets. Specifically, by assessing risks based on our risk appetite framework, we intend to seek to recalibrate(b) expand our business portfoliofranchise in Asia where medium- to long term growth is expected, and (c) develop new businesses that provide solutions utilizing data and digital technology to expand our business base for future growth. To pursue such strategy, in addition to organic growth, we aim to actively seek inorganic growth opportunities by reducinglow-margin assets whilst investing in more profitableleveraging our sufficient capital level.

Under our business strategy of “Transformation” and asset-efficient businesses.

Meanwhile, we intend to optimize workflows and share infrastructures among SMBC Group companies by fully utilizing digital technology. Specifically, we intend to enhance productivity on an SMBC Group-wide basis by reorganizing our retail branches and group structure such as through the merging of our security subsidiaries.

Focus on our strengths to generate growth

Based on our core competencies and the opportunities we see for growth“Growth”, we have identified the following “Seven Core Business Areas” which we wish to prioritizeKey Strategies” as shown below:

 

Pursue sustainable growth of wealth management business;

Improve productivity and strengthen solutions in the domestic wholesale business;

Enhance overseas corporate and investment banking business to improve asset / capital efficiency;

Hold the number one retail bankingposition in payment business;

Enhance asset-light business on a global basis;

Expand franchise in Japan;Asia and strengthen digital banking; and

 

Build on

Develop digital solutions for corporate clients.

Quality: Elevate quality in all aspects

We aim to make a consistent effort to enhance our lead position inmanagement system and corporate infrastructure as a global financial institution to fulfill the Japanesemedium-sized enterprise market;

expectations of our stakeholders.

Increase market share in Corporate & Investment Banking in key global markets;

EstablishSpecifically, as atop-tier position in product lines where basic management policy, we are competitive globally;

Acceleratecontinue to ensure our “Asia-centric” strategy;

Strengthen salescustomer-oriented approach and trading capability; and

Develop asset-light businesses: trust banking and asset management.

In addition to strengthening our domestic businesses, where we possess competitive advantages and can make steady profits,at the same time, we aim to implement growth strategies in international businessestake further actions such as promoting green finance and global products which are based on the strengths we have. Further,financial education programs to contribute to a sustainable society. In addition, we aim to generate new strengths that will contributecontinue to our future growth.

Integration across the SMBC Groupsophisticate human resource management and globallydevelopment to achieve sustainable growth

Governancehave employees perform at their full potential, and management structurewe aim to maximize our business potential.We transitioned from a company with a board of auditors to a company with three statutory committeesdevelop flexible and robust IT infrastructure in order to enhance our corporate governance system as a Global Systemically Important Financial Institution,“G-SIFI” on June 29, 2017. To maximize business opportunities on an SMBC Group-widecreate new added value through digitalization and global basis, we have established SMBC Group-wide business units and introduced a Group Chief Officers system (“CxO system”). Specifically, we intend to seek to meetstrengthen the needs

capability of a wide range of clients by executing strategies and strengthening services on an SMBC Group-wide basis. Further, we intend to optimize resource allocation by sharing management resources, for example by exchanging employees among SMBC Group companies. In addition, we intend to control the allocation of human resources and IT investment on an SMBC Group-wide basis by enhancing the capabilities of our planning and management functions. In order to support these initiatives, we intend to introduce management frameworks, such as setting ROE targets for each business unit, and improved management information systems. In addition, we have revised the executive pay system by introducing stock-based compensation which is linked to financial targets within our medium-term management plan and to our stock performancecyber security. Furthermore, in order to tightenenforce sound risk-taking, we strive to sophisticate the link withrisk appetite framework and practice business performance. We also raised the ratio of stock-based compensation for executivesmanagement in order to ensure the business is well aligned with the shareholder’s perspective.

Digitalization. With the rapid advance of digitalization, wean effective and scientific manner and aim to proactively introduce new technologiesfurther enhance our governance system in overseas businesses, including risk management and promote digitalization in variouscompliance areas such as enhancing the customer experience, generating new businesses, improving productivity and efficiency, and upgrading management infrastructure. Specifically, in order to enhance the customer experience, we intend to implement advanced digital solutions such as utilizing paperless transactions at retail branches and digital contracts with corporate customers. We intend to generate new businesses through digitalization focusing on creating new platforms such as a biometric authenticationfoundation of sustainable growth of our global business. In order to improve productivity and efficiency, we intend to digitalize certain back-office operations at branches and introduce public cloud servicing, which will also lead to work style reform. Furthermore, we intend to enhance data-based management by digitalizing information and “visualizing” the management system.

Revenues by Region

The following table sets forth the percentage of our total operating income under IFRS for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, based on the total operating income of our offices in the indicated regions. For each of the periods presented, we earned more than half of our total operating income in Japan, where we compete with other major Japanese banking groups and financial service providers. We earned the remainder in the Americas, Europe and Middle East, and Asia and Oceania, where we mainly compete with global financial institutions.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 

Region:

        

Japan

   70 70 77   66 66 66

Foreign:

        

Americas

   9 9 5   14 10 10

Europe and Middle East

   13 12 10   8 7 12

Asia and Oceania (excluding Japan)

   8 9 8   12 17 12
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   100 100 100   100 100 100
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Seasonality

Our business is not materially affected by seasonality.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

We are not reliant on any particular source of raw materials.

Marketing Channels

See “—Description of Operations and Principal Activities” for a discussion of our marketing channels.

Regulations in Japan

Our businesses are subject to extensive regulation, including the effects of changes in the laws, regulations, policies, voluntary codes of practice and interpretations in Japan. On the other hand, deregulation of banking activities in Japan, and more generally of the Japanese financial system, has proceeded, which has made the Japanese banking industry highly competitive.

Supervisory and regulatory authorities

Pursuant to the Banking Act, the FSAFinancial Services Agency of Japan has the authority in Japan to supervise banks, bank holding companies and banks’ principal shareholders, meaning bank shareholders having 20% (or 15% in some cases) or more of the voting rights of a bank. The BOJBank of Japan also has supervisory authority over banks in Japan based primarily on its contractual agreements and transactions with Japanese banks. Only companies licensed by the Prime Minister are defined as banks under the Banking Act, and licenses may be granted only to akabushiki kaisha, a joint stock corporation, withpaid-up capital of ¥2 billion or more.

The Financial Services Agency of Japan

The Prime Minister has supervisory authority over banks in Japan, which is generally delegated to the Financial Services Agency of Japan (“FSA”) except for matters prescribed by cabinet order. The Minister for Financial Services has the power to direct the FSA. Under the Banking Act, the FSA has supervisory control over banks, bank holding companies and banks’ principal shareholders in Japan, except for matters to which the Prime Minister retains authority.

The FSA’s authority includes granting and revoking of operating licenses, and approving business activities such as becoming a principal shareholder, establishment of subsidiaries or overseas offices, mergers, corporate splits or business transfers, and dissolutions or discontinuations of business by existing banks, etc.

The FSA may also instruct a Japanese bank to suspend its business or to remove directors if the bank violates laws, other regulations or their articles of incorporation or commits acts contrary to public policy. The FSA may also direct a Japanese bank in financial difficulty to take certain actions, such as holding certain property in Japan for the protection of depositors. Under the prompt corrective action (“PCA”) system, the FSA may take corrective actions in the case of capital deterioration of financial institutions.

The Ministry of Finance and the FSA have introduced a number of regulatory measures into the banking sector in Japan to secure sound management of banks, as well as measures to increase the transparency of the regulatory process, such as bank holding company regulations, single customer credit limits, disclosure regulations, regulations regarding reserves for loan losses and inspections.

The Banking Act authorizes the FSA to inspect banks and bank holding companies in Japan at any time and with any frequency. The FSA monitors the financial soundness of banks and the status and performance of their control systems and reviews their compliance with laws and regulations. The FSA hashad issued guidelines on its inspection of financial institutions called the Financial Inspection Manual. The Financial Inspection Manual itself does not have the force of law, but the FSA’s inspections of banks arehave been based on the Financial Inspection Manual, which emphasizesemphasized the need for bank self-assessment rather than assessment based on the advice of the government authority and risk management by each bank instead of a mere assessment of its assets. OnIn December 15, 2017, the FSA published a report outliningon its supervisory approaches and transformation, which was revised in June 2018. Based on the report, the FSA introduced its new supervisory approaches, which include expanding the scope of its supervisory approaches from a backward-looking,element-by-element compliance check to substantive, forward-looking and holistic analysis and judgment. Accordingjudgment, leading to the report,FSA’s repeal of the FSA will repeal the FSA’s Financial Inspection Manual after April 1,in December 2019. Following an inspection, the FSA may exercise its authority over a bank under the Banking Act to suspend or terminate its banking business.

The Ministry of Finance

The Ministry of Finance conducts examinations of banks in relation to foreign exchange transactions under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act.

The Bank of Japan

The Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) is the central bank of Japan and serves as the principal instrument for the execution of Japan’s monetary policy. The BOJ implements monetary policy mainly by adjusting its basic loan rate, open market operations and imposing deposit reserve requirements. All banks in Japan maintain deposits with the BOJ and rely substantially upon obtaining borrowings from and rediscounting bills with the BOJ. Moreover, most banks in Japan maintain current accounts under agreements with the BOJ pursuant to which the BOJ can conclude a contract with SMBC concerningon-site examinations. BOJ supervision is intended to support the effective execution of monetary policy, while FSA supervision aims to maintain the sound operations of banks in Japan and promote the security of depositors. Through its examinations, the BOJ seeks to identify problems at an early stage and give corrective guidance where necessary.

Regulations Regarding Capital Adequacy and Liquidity

Capital Adequacy Requirement

In 1988, the BCBS issued the Basel Capital Accord. The Basel Capital Accord sets minimum risk-weighted capital ratios for the purpose of maintaining sound management of banks which have international operations. The minimum risk-weighted capital ratio required was 8% on both a consolidated and nonconsolidated basis. In

2004, the BCBS issued the amended Basel Capital Accord (“Basel II”), which includes detailed measurement of credit risk, the addition of operational risk, a supervisory review process and market discipline through disclosure. These amendments did not change the minimum risk-weighted capital ratio of 8% applicable to banks with international operations (including SMBC). These rules took effect in Japan in 2007, and since 2008, banks are able to apply the advanced IRB approach for credit risk and the AMA for operational risk.

In July 2009, the BCBS approved a final package of measures to enhance certain elements of the Basel II framework, which includes an increase of the risk weights of resecuritization instruments and revisions of certain trading book rules (referred to as “Basel 2.5”), and the FSA’s capital adequacy guidelines which reflect such framework have been applied in Japan from December 2011.

In September 2009, the GHOS reached an agreement on several key measures to strengthen regulation of the banking sector, and in December 2009 the BCBS published a consultative document entitled “Strengthening the resilience of the banking sector” containing proposals on these measures centering on several core areas. The BCBS’ proposals focused on raising the quality, consistency and transparency of the regulatory capital base through measures including a requirement that the predominant form of Tier 1 capital must be common shares and retained earnings; limitations on the use of hybrid instruments with an incentive to redeem; a requirement that regulatory adjustments, including deductions of the amount of net deferred tax assets which rely on the future profitability of a bank, be applied to common equity generally; and a requirement for additional disclosure regarding regulatory capital levels.

The BCBS’ proposals also cover the following key areas:

 

strengthening the risk coverage of the capital framework;

 

introducing a leverage ratio as a supplementary measure to the Basel II risk-based framework with a view to migrating to a Pillar 1 (minimum capital requirement) treatment based on appropriate review and calibration (for further information, see “Leverage Ratio” below);

 

introducing measures to promote thebuild-up of capital buffers in good times that can be drawn upon in periods of stress; and

 

introducing minimum liquidity standards for internationally active banks that include a30-day liquidity coverage ratio requirement underpinned by a longer-term structural liquidity ratio (for further information, see “Liquidity Requirement” below).

In July 2010, the GHOS reached a broad agreement on the overall design of the BCBS’ capital and liquidity reform package. In addition, in August 2010, the BCBS issued for consultation a proposal to enhance the loss absorbency function of regulatory capital. In September 2010, the GHOS announced a substantial strengthening of existing capital requirements. The framework of the proposed reform was endorsed by theG-20 leaders at their Seoul summit in November 2010.

These capital reforms increased thewere phased in from January 2013 to January 2019. The minimum common equity requirement, from 2% tothe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement and the total minimum capital requirement have been 4.5%, 6% and will require8% respectively since January 2015. Moreover, banks have been required to hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% to withstand future periods of stress bringingsince January 2019. As a result, taking the totalcapital conservation buffer into account, the minimum common equity requirement, to 7%. Thethe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement also increased from 4% to 6% (increasing to 8.5% when included together withand the above capital conservation buffer). The total minimum capital requirement remains at 8% but will increase tohave been 7%, 8.5% and 10.5% with the capital conservation buffer by respectively since

January 2019. In addition, a countercyclical buffer within a range of 0% to 2.5% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital has been implemented according to national circumstances. The GHOS also agreed on transitional arrangements for implementing the new standards. Under the transitional arrangements, these new capital requirements are being phased in between January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2019. In December 2010, the BCBS published the new Basel III rules text. To reflect changes made by the BCBS, the FSA changed its capital adequacy guidelines. The FSA’s changes have mostly been applied from March 31, 2013, which generally reflect the main measures of the minimum capital requirements of the BCBS that started to be phased in on January 1, 2013 and will behave been fully applied from March 2019. The FSA’s changes which reflect capital buffer requirements under Basel III and theG-SIB capital surcharge described below have been applied from March 31, 2016.

In September 2013, the BCBS and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”) released the final framework for margin requirements fornon-centrally cleared derivatives (“2013 framework”). This framework will require high quality liquid assets to be posted as margin onnon-centrally cleared derivative transactions, which could adversely affect our liquidity position. The requirements were originally planned to be phased in over a four-year period beginning in December 2015 with the largest, most active and most systemically important participants in the derivatives market, including us. In March 2015, the BCBS and IOSCO released revisions to the 2013 framework, which delayed the beginning of thephase-in period for collecting and posting initial margin onnon-centrally cleared trades from December 2015 to September 2016. The fullphase-in schedule has been adjusted to reflect this nine-month delay. The revisions also institute asix-monthphase-in period of the requirement to exchange variation margin, which began in September 2016.

In addition to the above-mentioned minimum capital requirements and capital buffer requirements under Basel III, organizations identified by the FSB asG-SIBs, which includes us, are required to maintain an additional 1% to 2.5%2% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets based on the organization’s size, interconnectedness, substitutability, complexity and cross-jurisdictional activity as determined by the FSB. ThisG-SIB capital surcharge requirement started to be phased in from January 2016 and will be fully implemented in January 2019. The amount ofG-SIB capital surcharge that applieshas applied to us from 2019 based on the FSB’s determination will beis 1% of risk-weighted assets when the requirement is fully applied from 2019.assets. The FSB updates its list ofG-SIBs on an annual basis.

G-SIBs willare also be subject to a global standard for TLAC, which establishes a minimum requirementrequirements for loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution atG-SIBs, to ensure that they can be resolved in an orderly manner without putting public funds at risk. In November 2015, as part of its agenda to address risks arising fromG-SIBs, the FSB published the finalFSB’s TLAC standard.Standards. The finalFSB’s TLAC standard definesStandards define certain minimum requirements for instruments and liabilities so that if aG-SIB fails, it will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available to ensure that it can be resolved in an orderly manner which minimizes potential impact on financial stability, maintains the continuity of critical functions and avoids exposing public funds to loss.

In addition, in April 2016,March 2019, the FSA published a paper entitled “The FSA’s Approachthe Japanese TLAC Standards. The Japanese TLAC Standards apply to Introduce the TLAC Framework” (“FSA’s Approach”)Covered SIBs, which was revised in April 2018. This describes the FSA’s approach for the introduction of TLAC requirements in Japan, although it remains subject to change based on future international discussions. According to the FSA’s Approach, the preferred resolution strategy forG-SIBs in Japan is Single Point of Entry resolution, in which resolution powers are applied to thetop-level entity of a banking group by a single national resolution authority, although the actual measures to be taken will be determined on acase-by-case basis considering the actual condition of the relevantincludes (i) JapaneseG-SIB in crisis. To implement this Single Point of Entry resolution strategy effectively, the FSA plans to require bank holding companies of JapaneseG-SIBs, which willare designated as G-SIBs by the FSA in accordance with the designation by the FSB, such as us, and (ii) any domestic systemically important bank in Japan (Japanese D-SIB) that has been deemed to be in particular need for a cross-border resolution arrangement and as having particular systemic significance to the Japanese financial system if it fails. The Japanese TLAC Standards were applied to Japanese G-SIBs from March 31, 2019.

Under the FSB’s TLAC standards and the Japanese TLAC Standards, entities designated by the FSA as an entity that would enter into domestic resolution entities, proceedings for Japanese G-SIBs, or the Domestic Resolution Entities, are required:

to (i) meet thecertain minimum external TLAC requirements provided under the FSB’s TLAC standard (being at least 16% of their risk-weighted assets starting from March 2019 and at least 18% of their risk-weighted assets starting from March 2022),2022 as well as at least 6% of their Basel III leverage ratio denominator from March 31, 2019 and (ii)at least 6.75% from March 31, 2022); and

to cause theirany material subsidiaries that areor material sub-groups in Japan designated as systemically important by the FSA, or any foreign subsidiaries that are subject to TLAC requirements or similar requirements by the relevant foreign authorities, including but not limited to certain materialsub-groups as provided in the FSB’s TLAC standard, to maintain a certain level of capital and debt that is recognized by the FSA as having loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity (“internal TLAC, in order that losses incurred at the materialsub-group can be absorbed by the bank holding company through such internal TLAC with the involvement of the FSA. TLAC”).

In addition, according to the FSA’s Approach, Japanese TLAC Standards, Japanese G-SIBs are expected to be allowed to count Japan’s deposit insurance fund reserves in an amount equivalent to 2.5% of their risk-weighted assets from March 2019 and 3.5% of their risk-weighted assets from March 2022 as external TLAC.

The finalFSB’s TLAC standardStandards also prescribesprescribe a minimum TLAC requirement of at least 6% of the resolution group’s Basel III leverage ratio denominator starting from March 31, 2019, increasing to at least 6.75% starting from March 31, 2022, and according to the FSA’s Approach,Japanese TLAC Standards, the same external TLAC requirements on the leverage ratio basis are planned to be required for bank holding companies of JapaneseG-SIBs.G-SIBs As aG-SIB, we will beincluding us.

In our case, the FSA designated SMFG as our Domestic Resolution Entity, which makes SMFG subject to the finalexternal TLAC standard,requirements. The FSA also designated SMBC and SMBC Nikko Securities as implementedour material subsidiaries in Japan.

Japan, for which we are required to maintain a certain level of internal TLAC.

In the FSA’s explanatory paper entitled “The FSA’s Approach to Introduce the TLAC Framework,” which was published in April 2016 and revised in April 2018, the FSA has identified Single Point of Entry (“SPE”) resolution, in which resolution powers are applied to the ultimate holding company of a banking group by a single national resolution authority, as the preferred strategy for resolving currently designated G-SIBs in Japan. Under a possible model for SPE resolution of Japanese G-SIBs described in the Japanese TLAC Standards, if, with respect to a material subsidiary of a Japanese G-SIB that is designated as systemically important by the FSA, the FSA issues to the Domestic Resolution Entity of the Japanese G-SIB an order concerning the restoration of financial soundness, including recapitalization of, and restoration of liquidity to, such material subsidiary, such material subsidiary’s internal TLAC instruments will be written off or, if applicable, converted into equity in accordance with the applicable contractual loss-absorption provisions of such internal TLAC instruments. The FSA may issue such an order pursuant to Article 52-33, Paragraph 1 of the Banking Act upon its determination that the material subsidiary is non-viable due to a material deterioration in its financial condition after recognizing that its liabilities exceed or are likely to exceed its assets, or that it has suspended or is likely to suspend payment of its obligations.

Furthermore, as a disincentive forG-SIBs facing the maximumG-SIB capital surcharge to “increase materially their global systemic importance in the future,” an additional 1% capital surcharge could be applied. So long as we are identified as aG-SIB, we are also subject to stronger supervisory mandates and higher supervisory expectations for risk management functions, data aggregation capabilities, risk governance and internal controls. The substance of this heightened supervision has not yet been fixed, but we anticipate that at a minimum any rules will contain more stringent reporting requirements and impose common frameworks for data aggregation and internal risk management processes onG-SIBs.

Because we have been identified as aG-SIB, we are also subject to, among other things, resolution-related requirements described in the FSB’s “Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions.” In particular, the FSB has required the initial group ofG-SIBs to have in place a recovery and resolution plan, including a group-level plan, containing various specified elements, to be subject to regular resolvability assessments. Under the Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc., issued by the FSA, as part of crisis management, financial institutions identified asG-SIBs must prepare and submit a recovery plan, which includes a description of events that would trigger implementation of the recovery plan and the analysis of the recovery options to the FSA, and the FSA must prepare the resolution plan for eachG-SIB.

OnIn December 7, 2017, the GHOS endorsed the outstanding Basel III regulatory reforms. The endorsed reforms include the following elements:

 

a revised standardized approach for credit risk;

 

revisions to the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk, where the use of the most advanced internally modeled approaches forlow-default portfolios will be limited;

 

revisions to the credit valuation adjustment framework, including the removal of the internally modeled approach and the introduction of a revised standardized approach;

 

a revised standardized approach for operational risk, which will replace the existing standardized approaches and the advanced measurement approach;

 

revisions to the measurement of the leverage ratio and a leverage ratio buffer forG-SIBs; and

 

revisions to the capital floor, under which banks’ risk-weighted assets must be no lower than 72.5% of total risk-weighted assets as calculated using only the standardized approaches under the revised

Basel III framework, and a requirement that banks disclose their risk-weighted assets based on such standardized approaches.

On March 27, 2020, the GHOS endorsed a set of measures to provide additional operational capacity for banks and supervisors to respond to the immediate financial stability priorities resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global banking system. According to the measures, the implementation timeline of the outstanding Basel III framework, and a requirement that banks disclose their risk-weighted assets based on such standardized approaches.

standards has been deferred by one year. The revised framework, other than revisions to the capital floor, will take effect from January 1, 2022.2023. The revisions to the capital floor will be phased in from January 1, 2022,2023, with an initial capital floor of 50%, and will reach 72.5% by January 1, 2027.2028. On March 30, 2020, in light of the above changes, the FSA announced its plan to defer the implementation of Basel III standards in Japan by one year, to March 31, 2023. On December 24, 2020, the FSA published its draft regulatory policy for implementation of the Basel III standards in Japan.

Our securities subsidiaries in Japan are also subject to capital adequacy requirements under the FIEA. Under the requirements, securities firms must maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 120% on a nonconsolidated basis and must file periodic reports with the Commissioner of the FSA or the Director-General of the appropriate Local Finance Bureau, and also publicly disclose their capital adequacy ratio on a quarterly basis. In addition, securities firms whose total assets exceed ¥1,000 billion are required to maintain this minimum capital adequacy ratio on a consolidated basis. This requirement on a consolidated basis is applied in addition to and in a manner similar to the requirements on a nonconsolidated basis referred to above. Failure to meet the capital adequacy requirements will trigger mandatory regulatory action. For example, in the case of the requirement on a nonconsolidated basis, a securities firm with a capital adequacy ratio of greater than 120%, but less than 140% will be required to file daily reports with the Commissioner of the FSA or the Director-General of the appropriate Local Finance Bureau. A securities firm with a capital adequacy ratio of less than 120% may be ordered to change its business conduct, place its property in trust or be subject to other supervisory orders, as the

relevant authorities deem appropriate. A securities firm with a capital adequacy ratio of less than 100% may be subject to temporary suspension of all or part of its business operations or cancellation of its license to act as a securities broker and dealer.

The capital adequacy ratio for securities firms is defined as the ratio of adjusted capital to a quantified total of business risks, which include market risks, counterparty risks and operational risks (e.g., risks in carrying out daily business activities, such as administrative problems with securities transactions and clerical mistakes) quantified in the manner specified by a rule promulgated under the FIEA. Adjusted capital is defined as net worth less illiquid assets, as determined in accordance with Japanese GAAP. Net worth consists mainly of stated capital, additionalpaid-in capital, retained earnings, reserves for securities transactions, certain allowances for doubtful current accounts, net unrealized gains (losses) in the market value of investment securities, and subordinated debt. Illiquid assets generally includenon-current market assets, certain deposits and advances, and prepaid expenses.

Leverage Ratio

In March 2015, the FSA published its leverage ratio guidelines which have been applied from March 31, 2015 to help ensure broad and adequate capture of bothon- andoff-balance sheet sources of leverage for internationally active banks. The FSA’s leverage ratio guidelines are based on the text of the leverage ratio framework and disclosure requirements issued by the BCBS in January 2014. From January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2017, the BCBS monitored banks’ leverage ratio data to assess whether the design and calibration of its indicated minimum leverage ratio of 3% was appropriate.

In January 2016, the GHOS agreed that the leverage ratio should be based on a Tier 1 definition of capital and should comprise a minimum level of 3%. OnIn December 7, 2017, the definition and requirements of the leverage ratio were revised as part of the revised Basel III reforms. Under the revised Basel III reforms, in addition to meeting the minimum leverage ratio,G-SIBs are required to meet a leverage ratio buffer, which will take the form of a Tier 1 capital buffer set at 50% of the applicableG-SIB capital surcharge. Various refinements were also made to the definition of the leverage ratio exposure measure. The leverage ratio requirements under the

definition based on the framework issued by the BCBS in January 2014 were implemented as a Pillar 1 measurement from January 2018, and those under the revised definition and the leverage ratio buffer requirement for theG-SIBs will be implemented as a Pillar 1 measurement from January 1, 2023.

In March 2019, the FSA published its guidelines for the leverage ratio applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations, which have been applied from March 31, 2019. Under the FSA’s guidelines for the leverage ratio, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain a leverage ratio of at least 3% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis from March 31, 2019. On June 30, 2020, in light of the increasing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FSA published amendments to its guidelines for the leverage ratio, which mainly exclude deposits with the BOJ from the denominator for the calculation of the leverage ratio in order to maintain harmonization with the monetary policy implemented by the BOJ and the prudential regulations for banks and other financial institutions. These amendments came into force on June 30, 2020 and were scheduled to expire on March 31, 2021. On March 31, 2021, the FSA extended the expiry date of these amendments to March 31, 2022.

Liquidity Requirement

In October 2014, the FSA published its guidelines for liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations that have been applied from March 31, 2015. These guidelines are based on the full text of the LCR standard issued by the BCBS in January 2013. LCR is intended to promote resilience to potential liquidity disruptions over athirty-day horizon and help ensure that global banks have sufficient, unencumbered, high-quality liquid assets to offset the net cash outflows they could encounter under an acute short-term stress scenario. Under the FSA’s LCR guidelines, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain LCR of at least 100% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis, while thebasis. The minimum LCR requirements are being phased in betweenhave been 100% since March 31, 2015 and2019.

On March 31, 2019 with an increase of 10% in each year starting from 60%.

In October 2014,2021, the BCBS issued the final standardFSA published its guidelines for the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which requires applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations that will be applied from September 30, 2021. These guidelines are based on the full text of the NSFR standard issued by the BCBS in October 2014. NSFR is intended to require a minimum amount of stable sources of funding at a bank relative to the liquidity profiles of the bank’s assets, as well as the potential for contingent liquidity needs arising fromoff-balance sheet commitments, over aone-year horizon. Under the FSA’s NSFR guidelines, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain NSFR of at least 100% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis. The minimum NSFR was scheduled to be introduced as a minimum standard by January 1, 2018.Werequirements will be subject to the NSFR requirement, as implemented in Japan, but the FSA has not published any guidelines for the NSFR.100% from September 30, 2021.

Self-Assessment, Reserves and Related Disclosure

Financial institutions, including SMBC, are required to establish self-assessment programs to, among other things, analyze their assets giving due consideration to accounting principles and other applicable rules and to classify their assets into categories taking into account the likelihood of repayment and the risk of impairment to the value of the assets. These classifications determine whether an addition to or reduction in reserves or write-offs is necessary.

Pursuant to the Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“JICPA”) guidelines, the outcome of each financial institution’s self-assessment leads to substantially all of a bank’s loans and other claims on customers being analyzed by classifying obligors into five categories: (1) normal borrowers; (2) borrowers requiring caution; (3) potentially bankrupt borrowers; (4) effectivelyvirtually bankrupt borrowers; and (5) bankrupt borrowers. The reserve for possible loan losses is then calculated based on the obligor categories.

FSA guidelines require banks to classify their assets not only by the five categories of obligor but also by four categories of quality. SMBC has adopted its own internal guidelines for self-assessment which conform to guidelines currently in effect and comply with the PCA system requirements.

Based on the results of the self-assessment discussed above, SMBC is required to establish a reserve for its loan portfolio in an amount SMBC considers adequate at a balance sheet date. Three categories of reserves SMBC establishes, for statutory purposes, along with the Accounting Standards for Banks issued by the Japanese Bankers Association, are a general reserve, a specific reserve and a reserve for specific overseas loan losses.

Under the Banking Act, banks and bank holding companies must disclose theirnon- and under-performing loans (consolidated and nonconsolidated) as risk-monitored loans. Risk-monitored loans are classified into four categories: (1) bankrupt loans,(2) non-accrual loans, (3) past due loans (three months or more) and (4) restructured loans. Banks and bank holding companies are required to submit to the FSA annual reports on their business including the amount of risk-monitored loans. Banks and bank holding companies must disclose their financial statements on an annual basis. The financial statements consist of the balance sheet and income statement, and explanatory documents regarding business and asset conditions, each prepared under the Banking Act both on a nonconsolidated and consolidated basis.

Independent of the Banking Act disclosure regulations, the Act Concerning Emergency Measures for the Revitalization of Financial Functions requires banks to disclose their loans and their other problem assets. Under this law, assets are classified into four categories: (1) bankrupt and quasi-bankrupt assets, (2) doubtful assets, (3) substandard assets and (4) normal assets. Generally, bankrupt and quasi-bankrupt assets correspond to the total of bankrupt loans and the lower tier of thenon-accrual loans (the borrowers of which are effectivelyvirtually bankrupt) under the Banking Act disclosure. Doubtful assets generally correspond to the higher tier portion of thenon-accrual loans (the borrowers of which are not, but have the potential to become, bankrupt). The substandard assets generally correspond to the total of the restructured loans and past due loans (three months or more). Bankrupt and quasi-bankrupt assets and doubtful assets also includenon-loan assets, for example, securities lending, foreign exchange, accrued interest, advanced payments and customers’ liabilities for acceptances and guarantees.

Prompt Corrective Action System

Under the Prompt Corrective Action (“PCA”) system, the FSA may take corrective actions depending upon the extent of capital deterioration of a financial institution. The FSA may require a bank to submit and implement a capital reform plan, if;

 

the total risk-weighted capital ratio of a bank with international operations becomes less than 8% but not less than 4%;

the Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 4.5% but not less than 2.25%; or

 

the Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 6% but not less than 3%; or

the leverage ratio becomes less than 3% but not less than 1.5%.

The FSA may order a bank to (1) submit and implement a plan for improving its capital; (2) prohibit or restrict the payment of dividends to shareholders or bonuses to officers; (3) reduce assets or restrict any increase in assets; (4) prohibit or restrict the acceptance of deposits under terms less advantageous than ordinary terms; (5) reduce the business of some offices; (6) eliminate some offices other than the head office; (7) reduce or prevent the launching ofnon-banking businesses; or (8) take certain other actions, if;

 

the total risk-weighted capital ratio of a bank with international operations declines to less than 4% but not less than 2%;

 

the Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 2.25% but not less than 1.13%; or

 

the Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 3% but not less than 1.5%; or

the leverage ratio becomes less than 1.5% but not less than 0.75% (in this case, the FSA may order a bank to take actions described in (1) and (3) to (8) of the paragraph above).

The FSA may order a bank to conduct any one of the following: (1) a capital increase; (2) a substantial reduction in its business; (3) a merger; or (4) abolishment of its banking business, if;

 

the total risk-weighted capital ratio of a bank with international operations declines to less than 2% but not less than 0%;

 

the Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 1.13% but not less than 0%; or

 

the Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio becomes less than 1.5% but not less than 0%; or

the leverage ratio becomes less than 0.75% but not less than 0%.

The FSA may order the bank to suspend all or part of its business, if

the total risk-weighted capital ratio, the Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio or Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio of a bank with international operations declines below 0%; or

the leverage ratio declines below 0%.

The FSA may take actions similar to the actions the FSA may take with respect to a bank, if;

 

the total risk-weighted capital ratio of a bank holding company that holds a bank with international operations declines to levels below 8%;

 

the Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio declines to levels below 4.5%; or

 

the Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio declines to levels below 6%.; or

the leverage ratio declines to levels below 3%.

Prompt Warning System

The prompt warning system currently in effect allows the FSA to take precautionary measures to maintain and promote the sound operation of financial institutions before those financial institutions become subject to the PCA system. These measures include requiring a financial institution to reform: (1) profitability, if deemed necessary to improve profitability based upon a fundamental profit index; (2) credit risk management, if deemed necessary to reform management of credit risk based upon the degree of large credit concentration and other circumstances; (3) stability, if deemed necessary to reform management of market and other risks based upon, in particular, the effect of securities price fluctuations; and (4) cash flow management, if deemed necessary to reform management of liquidity risks based upon deposit trends and level of reserve for liquidity.

Restrictions on Capital Distributions

Under the FSA’s capital adequacy guidelines and related ordinances, if a bank fails to maintain capital levels under the capital buffer requirements in accordance with Basel III and theG-SIB capital surcharge, the

FSA may order a bank to submit and implement a reasonable capital distribution constraint plan to restore the capital levels. This plan shall include restrictions on capital distributions, such as dividends, share buybacks, discretionary payments on other Tier 1 capital instruments and bonuses, in such amount as determined depending on the degree of insufficiency of such requirements.

Regulations for Stabilizing the Financial System

Deposit Insurance System

The Deposit Insurance Act was enacted to protect depositors when deposit-taking institutions fail to meet their obligations. The Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan (“DIC”) implements the law and is supervised by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance. Subject to limited exceptions, the Prime Minister’s authority is delegated to the FSA Commissioner.

From April 20152019 to March 2017,2020, the DIC received annual insurance premiums from member deposit-taking institutions amounting to 0.054%0.045% of deposits primarily for payment and settlement purposes and 0.041%0.032% of deposits for other deposits, and from April 20172020 to March 2018,2021, they amounted to 0.049%0.045% and 0.036%0.031%, respectively. Furthermore, from April 2018,2021, they amounted to 0.046%0.042% and 0.033%0.029% respectively.

Premiums held by the DIC may be either deposited at deposit-taking institutions or used to purchase marketable securities. The insurance money may be paid out to depositors in case of a suspension of repayments of deposits, banking license revocation, dissolution or bankruptcy of a bank. Payouts are generally limited to a maximum of ¥10 million of principal amount together with any interest accrued with respect to each depositor. Onlynon-interest-bearing deposits that are redeemable upon demand and used by depositors primarily for payment and settlement functions are protected in full.

City banks (including SMBC), regional banks (including member banks of the second association of regional banks), trust banks, credit associations, credit cooperatives, labor banks and JAPAN POST BANK Co., Ltd. (“Japan Post BankBank”) participate in the deposit insurance system on a compulsory basis.

The Deposit Insurance Act also provides a permanent system for resolving failed deposit-taking institutions.

The basic method for resolving a failed deposit-taking institution under the Deposit Insurance Act is cessation of the business by paying insurance money to depositors up to the principal amount of ¥10 million plus accrued interest per depositor, orpay-off or transfer of the business to another deposit-taking institution, with financial assistance provided within the cost ofpay-off. Under the Deposit Insurance Act, transfer of business is regarded as the primary method. In order to affect a prompt transfer of business, the following framework has been established:

 

a Financial Reorganization Administrator is appointed by the FSA Commissioner and takes control of the management and assets of the failed deposit-taking institution. The administrator is expected to diligently search for a deposit-taking institution which will succeed to the business of the failed institution;

 

if no successor deposit-taking institution can be immediately found, a “bridge bank” will be established by the DIC for the purpose of temporarily maintaining the operations of the failed deposit-taking institution, and the bridge bank will seek to transfer the failed deposit-taking institution’s assets to another deposit-taking institution or dissolve the failed deposit-taking institution; and

 

in order to facilitate or encourage a deposit-taking institution to succeed to a failed business, financial aid may be provided by the DIC to any successor deposit-taking institution to enhance its capital after succession or to indemnify it for losses incurred as a result of the succession.

Where it is anticipated that the failure of a deposit-taking institution may cause an extremely grave problem in maintaining the financial order in Japan or the region where the deposit-taking institution is operating, the following exceptional measures may be taken following deliberation by Japan’s Financial Crisis Response Council:

 

  

the DIC may subscribe for shares or other instruments issued by the relevant deposit-taking institution or the holding company thereof and require the institution to submit to the DIC a plan to reestablish sound management (Item 1 measures) (dai ichigo sochi);

 

  

once the deposit-taking institution fails, financial aid exceeding the cost ofpay-off may be available to the institution (Item 2 measures) (dai nigo sochi); and

 

  

if the failed institution is a bank and the problem cannot be avoided by other measures, then the DIC may acquire all of the shares of the bank (Item 3 measures) (dai sango sochi).

In order to fund the above-mentioned activities, the DIC may borrow from financial institutions or issue bonds which may be guaranteed by the Government of Japan.

In addition, on June 12, 2013, a bill to amend the Deposit Insurance Act which includes establishment of a new orderly resolution regime of financial institutions was enacted and became effective on March 6, 2014. Financial institutions including banks, securities companies and insurance companies and their holding companies will be subject to the new resolution regime that includes, among others, the following features.

Under the new resolution regime, where the Prime Minister recognizes that the failure of a financial institution which falls into either of (a) or (b) below may cause significant disruption in the financial markets or other financial systems in Japan if measures described in (a) (specified Item 1 measures) (tokutei dai ichigo sochi) or measures described in (b) (specified Item 2 measures) (tokutei dai nigo sochi) are not taken, the Prime Minister may confirm that any of the following measures need to be applied to the financial institution following deliberation by Japan’s Financial Crisis Response Council:

(a) if the financial institution is not a financial institution whose liabilities exceed its assets, which means it is unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, the DIC shall supervise the operation of business and management and disposal of assets of that financial institution, and may provide it with loans or guarantees necessary to avoid the risk of significant disruption in the financial systems in Japan, or subscribe for shares or subordinated bonds of, or lend subordinated loans to, the financial institution, taking into consideration the financial condition of the financial institution;

(b) if the financial institution is a financial institution whose liabilities exceed or are likely to exceed its assets or which has suspended or is likely to suspend payment of its obligations, the DIC shall supervise the operation of business and management and disposal of assets of that financial institution and may provide financial aid necessary to assist a merger, business transfer, corporate split or other reorganization in respect to such failed financial institution; and

if a measure set out in (b) above is determined to be taken with respect to a financial institution, the Prime Minister may order that the financial institution’s operations of business and management and disposal of assets be placed under the special control of the DIC. The business or liabilities of the financial institution subject to the special supervision by the DIC as set forth above may also be transferred to a “bridge bank” established by the DIC for the purpose of the temporary maintenance and continuation of operations of, or repayment of the liabilities of, such financial institution, and the bridge bank will seek to transfer the financial institution’s business or liabilities to another financial institution or dissolve the financial institution. The financial aid provided by the DIC to assist a merger, business transfer, corporate split or other reorganization in respect to the financial institution set out in (b) above may take the form of a monetary grant, loan or deposit of funds, purchase of assets, guarantee or assumption of debts, subscription of preferred stock or subordinated bonds, subordinated loan, or loss sharing.

The expenses for implementation of the measures for these crisis management operations will be borne by the financial industry; provided, however, the Government of Japan may provide subsidies to the DIC within the limit to be specified in the government budget in cases where it is likely to cause extremely serious hindrance to the maintenance of the credit system in Japan or significant turmoil in the financial market or other financial system of Japan if such expenses are to be borne only by the financial industry.

In March 2014, the FSA made an announcement clarifying the requirement of loss absorbency at the point ofnon-viability for additional Tier 1 instruments and Tier 2 instruments under Basel III issued by banks and bank holding companies. According to the announcement, (i) additional Tier 1 instruments and Tier 2 instruments under Basel III issued by a bank must be written-down or converted into common shares when the Prime Minister of Japan confirms (nintei) that the above-described “Item 2 measures (dai nigo sochi),” “Item 3 measures (dai sango sochi),” or “specified Item 2 measures (tokutei dai nigo sochi)” need to be applied to the bank and (ii) additional Tier 1 instruments and Tier 2 instruments under Basel III issued by a bank holding company must be written-down or converted into common shares when the Prime Minister of Japan confirms (nintei) that the above-described “specified Item 2 measures (tokutei dai nigo sochi)” need to be applied to the

bank holding company. The FSA also stated in the announcement that the trigger event for loss absorbency at the point ofnon-viability with respect to such instruments should be construed in accordance with the then effective financial crisis response framework for banks and bank holding companies that have failed or are likely to fail, since the purpose of such write-down or conversion required under Basel III is to ensure that all classes of these capital instruments fully absorb losses at the point ofnon-viability before taxpayers are exposed to loss.

Special Measures Act Concerning Facilitation of Reorganization by Financial Institutions, Etc.

Under the Special Measures Act Concerning Facilitation of Reorganization by Financial Institutions, Etc.: (1) for one year after the merger or transfer of the entire business of a deposit-taking institution, the maximum amount to be covered by the deposit insurance will be ¥10 million multiplied by the number of parties to the merger or business transfer; and (2) the procedures are simplified to a certain extent in connection with the transfer of an entire business or a merger with another deposit-taking institution by a deposit-taking institution that is made in accordance with a management base-strengthening plan that has been approved by the Government of Japan.

Single Customer Credit Limit

The Banking Act restricts the aggregate amount of credit and loans that may be extended to any single customer in order to avoid the excessive concentration of credit risks and promote the fair and extensive use of bank credit. To tighten the restrictions under Japanese law to meet international standards, the amendment to the Banking Act and the related cabinet order were amended in June 2013promulgated on October 30, 2019, and October 2014, respectively and those amendmentsthis amendment became effective in December 2014.on April 1, 2020. As a result of the amendments,amendment, the credit limit of bank holding companies, banks or bank groups for any single customer, including certain of the customer’s affiliates, was lowered from 40% tois 25% of the total qualifyingTier 1 capital of the bank holding company, bank or bank group, with certain adjustments.

Restrictions on Activities of a Bank Holding Company

Under the Banking Act, a bank holding company is prohibited from carrying on any business other than management of its subsidiaries and other incidental businesses. A bank holding company may have any of the following as a subsidiary: a bank, a securities company, an insurance company or a foreign subsidiary that engages in the banking, securities or insurance business. In addition, a bank holding company may have as a subsidiary any company that engages in finance-related business, such as a credit card company, a leasing company or an investment advisory company. Certain companies that are designated by ministerial ordinance as those that cultivate new business fields may also become the subsidiary of a bank holding company.

An amendment to the Banking Act was promulgated in June 2016. Among other things, the amendment (1) requires a bank holding company to enhance group management, by measures including establishment of a

basic policy of such group, coordination of conflicts of interest among group companies, development of a group compliance system and others; (2) permits a bank holding company or a group company, with prior approval of the Government of Japan, to manage certain businesses of other group companies that are common and duplicative; and (3) permits a bank or a bank holding company, with prior approval of the government, to hold voting rights of companies conducting businesses that contribute to or are expected to contribute to the sophistication of the banking business or the enhancement of customer convenience by utilizing information technology or other technologies, regardless of the shareholding restriction described below. The amendment became effective from April 2017.

Restriction on Aggregate Shareholdings by a Bank

The Act Concerning Restriction on Shareholdings by Banks requires Japanese banks and their qualified subsidiaries to limit the aggregate market value (excluding unrealized gains, if any) of their equity securities holdings to an amount equal to 100% of their consolidated Tier 1 capital, with adjustments, in order to reduce

exposure to stock price fluctuations. Treasury shares, shares issued by subsidiaries, shares not listed on any stock exchange or not registered with any OTC market, shares held as trust assets, and shares acquired throughdebt-for-equity swaps in restructuring transactions are excluded from this limitation. In order to facilitate the disposition of shares of listed stocks held by banks while preventing adverse effects caused by sales of large amounts of shares in a short period of time, share purchases by the Banks’ Shareholdings Purchase Corporation of listed shares have been restarted from March 2009.

Shareholding Restrictions Applicable to a Bank Holding Company and a Bank

The provision of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade which prohibits banks from holding more than 5% of the voting rights ofnon-financial companies in Japan does not apply to bank holding companies. However, the Banking Act generally prohibits a bank holding company and its subsidiaries, on an aggregated basis, from holding more than 15% of the voting rights of certain types of companies which are not permitted to become subsidiaries of bank holding companies. Also, the Banking Act generally prohibits a bank and its subsidiaries, on an aggregated basis, from holding more than 5% of the voting rights of certain types of companies which are not permitted to become subsidiaries of banks.

Examination and Reporting Applicable to Shareholders of a Bank

The FSA may request the submission of reports or other materials from a bank and/or its bank holding company or inspect the bank and/or the bank holding company, if necessary, in order to secure the sound and appropriate operation of the business of a bank.

Under the Banking Act, a person who desires to hold 20% (in some exceptional cases, 15%) or more of the voting rights of a bank is required to obtain advance approval of the FSA Commissioner. In addition, the FSA may request the submission of reports or materials from, or may conduct an inspection of, any principal shareholder who holds 20% (in some exceptional cases, 15%) or more of the voting rights of a bank if the FSA deems the action necessary in order to secure the sound and appropriate operation of the business of the bank. Under limited circumstances, the FSA may order the principal shareholder to take such measures as the FSA deems necessary.

Furthermore, any person who becomes a holder of more than 5% of the voting rights of a bank holding company or a bank must report the ownership of the voting rights to the Director General of the relevant local finance bureau within five business days. This requirement is separate from the significant shareholdings report required under the FIEA. In addition, a similar report must be made in respect of any subsequent change of 1% or more in any previously reported holding or in respect of any change in material matters set out in reports previously filed, with some exceptions.

Regulations for Protection of Customers

Protection of Personal Information

The Act on the Protection of Personal Information and related rules, regulations and guidelines impose requirements on businesses that use databases containing personal information, including appropriate custody of personal information and restrictions on information sharing with third parties.

Act on Sales, Etc. of Financial Products

Due to deregulatory measures in the banking and other financial services industries, more financial products, including highly structured and other complicated products, may now be marketed to a broad base of customers. The Act on Sales, Etc. of Financial Products was enacted to better protect customers from incurring unexpected losses as a result of purchasing these financial products. Under this law, sellers of financial products have a duty to their potential customers to explain important matters (i.e., the nature and magnitude of risk

involved) regarding the financial products that they sell. If a seller fails to comply with the duty, the loss in value of the purchased investment product due to the failure to explain is refutably presumed to be the amount of the customer’s loss. An amendment to this law, together with other related laws including the FIEA, became effective in September 2007. The amended law enlarges the scope of the duty of financial services providers to inform customers of important matters related to the financial products that they offer.

On June 12, 2020, certain amendments to the Act on Sales, Etc. of Financial Products were promulgated, and will become effective within one and a half years from the date of promulgation. Per these amendments, the name of the law will be changed to “the Act on Provision of Financial Services.” The amendments introduce a registration scheme for “financial services intermediary businesses.” Through a single registration as a financial services intermediary business, registrants will be able to provide intermediary services for each of banking, securities and insurance. The amendments to the law will not require any provider of financial services intermediary business to belong to a specific financial institution, but will impose certain regulations to protect customers, including limitations on the type of services that they may provide and prohibitions on the acceptance of assets of customers and lodging a security deposit.

Act Concerning Protection of Depositors and Relief for Victims of Certain Types of Fraud

The Act Concerning Protection of Depositors from Illegal Withdrawals Made by Forged or Stolen Cards requires financial institutions to establish internal systems to prevent illegal withdrawals of deposits made using forged or stolen bank cards. The law also requires financial institutions to compensate depositors for any amount illegally withdrawn using forged or stolen bankcards, subject to certain conditions.

The Act Concerning Payment of Dividends for Relief of Damages from Funds in Account used in connection with Crimes requires that financial institutions take appropriate measures against various crimes including the closing of accounts used in connection with fraud and other crimes. The law also requires financial institutions to make, in accordance with specified procedures, payments from funds collected from the closed accounts to victims of certain crimes.

Laws Prohibiting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds

Under the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds, which addresses money laundering and terrorism concerns, financial institutions and certain other entities, such as credit card companies, are required to perform customer identification, submit suspicious transaction reports and keep records of their transactions.

Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act of Japan

Under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act, SMBC is required to confirm that necessary permission from the relevant authorities is obtained by the customer or obtain necessary permission itself, for certain transaction involving targets who are designated under the law and the relevant orders thereunder including North Korea or Iran.

Act on Special Measures Concerning International Terrorist Assets-Freezing, etc. Conducted by the Government Taking into Consideration United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267, etc.

Under the Act on Special Measures Concerning International Terrorist Assets-Freezing, etc. Conducted by the Government Taking into Consideration United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267, etc., SMBC is generally prohibited to conduct certain transactions including donating or lending of money, securities or real estates or refunding of deposit with International Terrorist, who are designated under the law.

Other Regulations Related to Our Business

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan

The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (“FIEA”) regulates the securities industry and most aspects of securities transactions in Japan, including public offerings, private placements and secondary trading of securities, ongoing disclosure by securities issuers, tender offers for securities, organization and operation of securities exchanges and self-regulatory organizations and registration of securities companies. The Prime Minister has the authority to regulate the securities industry and securities companies, which authority is delegated to the FSA Commissioner under the FIEA. The Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission, an external agency of the FSA, is independent from the Agency’s other bureaus and is vested with authority to conductday-to-day monitoring of the securities markets and to investigate irregular activities that hinder fair trading of securities, including inspection of securities companies as well as banks in connection with their securities business. Furthermore, the FSA Commissioner delegates certain authority to the Director General of the Local Finance Bureau to inspect local securities companies and their branches. A violation of applicable laws and regulations may result in various administrative sanctions, including revocation of registration or authorization, suspension of business or an order to discharge any Director or Executive Officer who has failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Securities companies are also subject to the rules and regulations of the Japanese stock exchanges and the Japan Securities Dealers Association, a self-regulatory organization of securities companies.

Regulation of the Consumer Finance Business

In order to resolve the problems of heavily indebted borrowers and to effect proper regulation of the consumer finance business, in June 2010, maximum legal interest rates were reduced to levels prescribed by the Interest Rate Restriction Act, ranging from 15% to 20%, and gray zone interest, which is interest on loans in excess of rates prescribed by the Interest Rate Restriction Act up to the 29.2% maximum rate permitted under the Contributions Act, was abolished. Judicial decisions have strictly interpreted the conditions under which consumer finance companies may retain gray zone interest. As a result, claims for refunds of gray zone interest increased substantially. Amendments to the Money Lending Business Act provide an additional upper limit on aggregate borrowings by an individual from all moneylenders over which moneylenders may not extend further loans, as well as stricter regulation and supervision of moneylender activities.

Installment Sales Act

In order to ensure the fairness of transactions with respect to installment and other sales, prevent damage to consumers and manage credit card numbers, the Installment Sales Act imposes requirements on those who conduct installment sales businesses. In June 2008, revisions to the Installment Sales Act were enacted, most of which became effective in December 2009. The revisions impose more stringent and expanded requirements for credit card companies, including, among other things: (1) wider coverage of installment sales under the regulations; (2) measures to prevent inappropriate extensions of credit for certain credit transactions; (3) measures to prevent excessive lending for certain credit transactions that include requirements to investigate the payment ability of consumers by use of designated credit information organizations and prohibition of execution of credit agreements that exceed the payment ability of consumers; and (4) measures to protect certain information, such as credit numbers.

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)

In July 2013, the Organization for EconomicCo-operation and Development (“OECD”) published the Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) in order to prevent exploiting of gaps and mismatches in tax rules and artificial shifting of profits to low orno-tax locations. In October 2015, the OECD published the final package of measures for a comprehensive, coherent and coordinated reform of the international tax rules for 15 key areas. These measures will apply once they are implemented either in domestic laws or in the network of

bilateral tax treaties. Some of the deliverables published by the OECD have been partially reflected to Japanese tax regulations by the tax reforms adopted from 2015 through 2018.2021 and to certain several bilateral tax treaties to which Japan is a party through the implementation of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in Japan.

Common Reporting Standard (CRS)

In order to prevent tax evasion and avoidance through offshore financial accounts, the OECD developed the Common Reporting Standards (“CRS”), which calls on jurisdictions to obtain information on financial accounts ofnon-residents from their financial institutions and automatically exchange that information with other jurisdictions. From the perspective of implementation of the exchange of information based on CRS, the Act on Special Provisions of the Income Tax Act, the Corporation Tax Act and the Local Tax Act Incidental to Enforcement of Tax Treaties as well as the cabinet and ministerial ordinances thereunder has been amended as part of the tax reform of 2015, which became effective on January 1, 2017, and those who open a financial account with a financial institution located in Japan must submit a self-certification indicating the name of the jurisdiction of residence, etc. From 2018, each financial institution must report information pertaining to financial accounts of specificnon-residents and the information is automatically exchanged with tax administrations of each jurisdiction on an annual basis.

Deregulation

The developments toward deregulation of the financial system including those described below have made the Japanese banking industry highly competitive.

Deregulation of Bank Engagement in the Securities Business

The gradual relaxation of the restrictions under the Securities and Exchange Act allowed banks to engage in the following business lines, after taking appropriate registration measures with the FSA:

 

underwriting and dealing in Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, commercial paper and certain bonds issued by special purpose companies;

 

selling beneficiary certificates of investment trusts and securities issued by an investment company; and

 

dealing in listed or OTC securities or derivatives transactions as well as in the securities intermediary business.

In addition, amendments to the FIEA and the Banking Act relating to firewalls and conflicts of interest between banks, securities companies and insurance companies became effective on June 1, 2009. The amendment relating to firewalls abolished the ban on certain officers and employees from holding concurrent posts in banks, securities companies and insurance companies, and relaxed restrictions on the transfer ofnon-public customer information. On the other hand, the amendment relating to conflicts of interest requires those financial institutions, including banks, to implement proper information management procedures and to develop appropriate internal systems to prevent customer interests from being unfairly harmed through trading by the companies or by other companies within their group. For example, the companies may be required to create information barriers between departments and monitor how it executes transactions with customers.

Deregulation of Insurance Products

The gradual deregulation of the financial services industry permitted banks in Japan to offer an increased variety of insurance products, including pension-type insurance to the full range, as an agent.

Privatization of Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.’s subsidiaries

In December 2014, under the Postal Privatization Act, Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. (“Japan Post Holdings”), a joint stock corporation that holds shares of operating companies, published a plan for the listing of

Japan Post Holdings, Japan Post Bank, one of the world’s largest deposit-taking institutions, and Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. (“Japan Post Insurance”) and the gradual disposition of its shares of Japan Post Bank and Japan Post Insurance down to approximately 50% ownership. In November 2015, each of Japan Post Holdings, Japan Post Bank and Japan Post Insurance publicly offered approximately 11% of their outstanding shares, respectively, and they were listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Japan Post Bank is required to receive prior approval of the Government of Japan to expand its business until Japan Post Holdings disposes of at least half of the shares of Japan Post Bank.

Regulations in the United States

As a result of its operations in the United States, SMBCthe Company and the CompanySMBC are subject to extensive federal and state banking and securities supervision and regulation. SMBC engages in U.S. banking activities directly through its branches in Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York and through its representative offices in Houston, Dallas, Silicon Valley, Chicago and Chicago.White Plains, New York. SMBC also controls a U.S. banking subsidiary, Manufacturers Bank, and a U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc. Through a reorganization of our existing U.S. operations, the Company and SMBC established a U.S. bank holding company, SMBC Americas Holdings, Inc. (“SMBCAH”), a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of SMBC at January 1, 2019. SMBCAH is currently the holding company for Manufacturers Bank, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc. and certain other U.S. subsidiaries. The establishment of SMBCAH enhanced the Company and SMBC’s U.S. corporate governance capabilities by centralizing the supervision and management of its U.S. operations and bring together its primary U.S.-based banking, securities, capital markets and other subsidiaries under the new holding company.

SMBC’s New York branch is supervised by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Department of Financial Services, but its deposits are not insured (or eligible to be insured) by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). SMBC’s Los Angeles and San Francisco branches are supervised by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the California Department of Business Oversight,Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”), but their deposits are not insured (or eligible to be insured) by the FDIC. SMBC’s representative officeoffices in Houston isand in Dallas are subject to regulation and examination by the Texas Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.Dallas and the Texas Department of Banking. SMBC’s representative office in Silicon Valley is subject to regulation and examination by the California Department of Business Oversight and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. TheFrancisco and the California DFPI. SMBC’s representative office in Chicago is subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional RegulationRegulation. SMBC’s representative office in White Plains, New York is subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.New York and the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Manufacturers Bank is a California state-chartered bank with FDIC-insured deposits that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System. As such, Manufacturers Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the California DFPI.

The Company, SMBC and the CompanySMBCAH are qualifying foreign banking organizations under the U.S. International Banking Actbank holding companies by virtue of 1978, as amended (“International Banking Act”),their ownership of Manufacturers Bank, and as such are subject to regulation as bank holding companies under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“Bank Holding Company Act”). Additionally, SMBC, and the Company are bank holding companies by virtue of their ownership of Manufacturers Bank. As a result, SMBC, the Company and their U.S. operations are subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board as their U.S. “umbrella supervisor.” The Company, SMBC and SMBCAH are required to serve as sources of financial strength to Manufacturers Bank.

Manufacturers Bank is a California state-chartered bank that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System. As a statenon-member bank the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, Manufacturers Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the California Department of Business Oversight.

In order to further expand our business in the U.S., we and SMBC obtained financial holding company status under the Bank Holding Company Act in May 2013, which authorizes the expansion of the scope of services we provide in the U.S., including the underwriting, dealing and making markets in, securities and other investment banking services.

Restrictions on Business Activities

As described below, federalThe Bank Holding Company Act imposes restrictions on the Company and state banking lawsSMBC’s U.S. non-banking operations. Bank holding companies that elect to be treated as financial holding companies, such as the

Company, SMBC and regulations restrict SMBC’s andSMBCAH are, however, permitted to engage in a broader range of activities in the Company’s ability toUnited States. Unless otherwise limited by the Federal Reserve Board, financial holding companies generally can engage, directly or indirectly throughin the U.S. and abroad, in financial activities, either de novo or by acquisition, by providing after-the-fact notice to the Federal Reserve Board. These financial activities include underwriting, dealing and making markets in securities, insurance underwriting and brokerage and making merchant banking investments in non-financial companies for a limited period of time, as long as the financial holding company does not directly or indirectly manage the non-financial companies’ day-to-day activities, and the financial holding company’s banking subsidiaries engage only in permitted cross-marketing with the non-financial companies.

The Company and SMBC elected to be treated as financial holding companies in May 2013, and SMBCAH elected to be treated as a financial holding company upon becoming a U.S. bank holding company in January 2019. The Company, SMBC, SMBCAH and Manufacturers Bank, as our U.S. insured depository institution subsidiary, are required to be “well capitalized” and “well managed,” including maintenance of examination ratings that are at least satisfactory, in order for the Company, SMBC, and SMBCAH to continue to be treated as financial holding companies. In April 2019, SMBC and its New York branch entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York requiring SMBC and its New York branch to address certain deficiencies relating to the New York branch’s anti-money laundering and economic sanctions compliance program. SMBC and its New York branch are required, among other things, to implement corrective measures and submit periodic progress reports to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In addition, as a result of the deficiencies identified in the written agreement, we no longer meet the requirements to be treated as a financial holding company, and, pending completion of a remediation plan designed to meet these requirements, we are currently subject to restrictions in our ability to engage in certain new categories of financial activities in the United States and to make acquisitions of companies engaged in activities in the United States. Divestiture or termination of certain business activities in the U.S. may also be required as a consequence of failure to correct the conditions giving rise to such restrictions within the prescribed period of time.

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, the Company, SMBC and the CompanySMBCAH are also required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before directly or indirectly acquiring the ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares of U.S. banks, certain other depository institutions and bank or depository institution holding companies. Under the Bank

Holding Company Act and the Federal Reserve Board regulations, SMBC is required to serve as a source of financial strength to Manufacturers Bank. In addition, SMBC’s U.S. banking operations (including Manufacturers Bank and SMBC’s U.S. branches) are also restricted from engaging in certain “tying” arrangements involving products and services.

As financial holding companies, we, SMBC and the companies under our control are permitted to engage in a broader range of activities in the U.S. and abroad than permitted for bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Unless otherwise limited by the Federal Reserve Board, financial holding companies generally can engage, directly or indirectly in the U.S. and abroad, in financial activities, either de novo or by acquisition, by providingafter-the-fact notice to the Federal Reserve Board. These financial activities include underwriting, dealing and making markets in securities, insurance underwriting and brokerage and making merchant banking investments innon-financial companies for a limited period of time, as long as the financial holding company does not directly or indirectly manage thenon-financial companies’day-to-day activities, and the financial holding company’s banking subsidiaries engage only in permitted cross-marketing with thenon-financial companies. If we or SMBC cease to qualify as financial holding companies, we could be barred from new financial activities or acquisitions, and have to discontinue the broader range of activities permitted to financial holding companies.

Other Prudential Restrictions

SMBC’s U.S. branches and Manufacturers Bank are subject to requirements and restrictions under U.S. federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be made and limitations on the types of investments that may be made and the types of services that may be offered. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of Manufacturers Bank, and to a limited extent, SMBC’s New York and California branches.

In addition, under U.S. federal banking laws, state-chartered banks (such as Manufacturers Bank) and state-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks (such as SMBC’s New York branch) may not, as a general matter, engage as a principal in any type of activity not permissible for their federally chartered or licensed counterparts, unless (i) in the case of state-chartered banks, the FDIC determines that the additional activity would pose no significant risk to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund and is consistent with sound banking practices and (ii) in the case of state-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks, the Federal Reserve Board determines that the additional activity is consistent with sound banking practices. The U.S. federal banking laws also subject state branches and agencies of foreign banks to the same single-borrower lending limits that apply to federal branches or agencies, which are substantially similar to the lending limits applicable to national banks. For SMBC’s U.S. branches, these single-borrower lending limits are based on the worldwide capital of SMBC.

Under the International Banking Act, the Federal Reserve Board may terminate the activities of any U.S. office of a foreign bank if it determines (i) that the foreign bank is not subject to comprehensive supervision on a consolidated basis in its home country (unless the home country is making demonstrable progress toward establishing such supervision), (ii) that there is reasonable cause to believe that such foreign bank or its affiliate has violated the law or engaged in an unsafe or unsound banking practice in the United States and, as a result of such violation or practice, the continued operation of the U.S. office would be inconsistent with the public interest or with the purposes of federal banking laws, or (iii) for a foreign bank that presents a risk to the stability of the United States financial system, the home country of the foreign bank has not adopted, or made demonstrable progress toward adopting, an appropriate system of financial regulation to mitigate such risk.

There are various qualitative and quantitative restrictions on the extent to which the Company and its subsidiaries can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from its U.S. bank subsidiary, Manufacturers Bank or engage in certain other transactions involving that subsidiary. In general, these transactions must be on terms that would ordinarily be offered by Manufacturers Bank to unaffiliated entities, and credit transactions must be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. In addition, certain transactions, such as certain purchases by

Manufacturers Bank from SMBC or itsnon-bank subsidiaries, are subject to volume limitations. Effective in July 2012, the Dodd-Frank Act (discussed below) subjects creditCredit exposure arising from derivative transactions, securities borrowing and lending transactions, and repurchase/reverse repurchase agreements is subject to these collateral and volume transactions limitations.

Regulatory Requirements Applicable to Financial Holding Companies

As financial holding companies, we and SMBC are subject to additional regulatory requirements. For example, we, SMBC and Manufacturers Bank, which is our U.S. insured depository institution subsidiary, must be “well capitalized,” meaning maintenance of a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% under the revised capital standards of Basel III, which became effective on January 1, 2015 in the U.S. In addition, we, SMBC and Manufacturers Bank must be “well managed,” including maintenance of examination ratings that are at least satisfactory. Further, SMBC is also required to be well capitalized and well managed under its home country standards, which must be comparable to those required for a U.S. bank. Failure to comply with such requirements would require us and SMBC to prepare a remediation plan, and we would not be able to undertake new business activities or acquisitions based on our status as a financial holding company during any period of noncompliance without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Divestiture or termination of certain business activities in the U.S. may also be required as a consequence of failure to correct such conditions within 180 days.

Regulations for Stabilizing the Financial System

U.S. Financial Regulatory Reform

Both the scope of the U.S. laws and regulations and the intensity of supervision have increased in recent years, in response to the financial crisis as well as other factors such as technological and market changes. Regulatory enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services sector. Many of these changes have occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations most of which are now in place, and have resulted in or are anticipated to result in additional costs and impose certain limitations on our and SMBC’s business activities. The current U.S. Presidential administration has expressedIn 2017, President Trump issued an executive order that set forth principles for financial regulatory and legislative reform of the federal financial regulatory framework, and sparked several statutory and regulatory initiatives aimed at providing relief for the financial services industry. We expect that the Biden Administration and the Democratically-controlled Congress will seek to implement a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different policy goals with respectthan that of the Trump Administration. It is too early for us to financial regulation, but theassess which policies would be implemented and what their impact that such U.S. Presidential administration’s policy goals or any new or proposed legislation could have on the regulatory requirements currently imposed on us and SMBC remains uncertain.would be.

In 2013,We are subject to the Federal Reserve Board, the SEC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the FDIC, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted final rules implementing what is known as the “Volcker Rule.” The final rules restrictVolcker Rule, which restricts the ability of banking entities, such as us and SMBC, to engage as principal in proprietary trading activities, or sponsor, invest in, or retain investments in certain private equity, hedge or similar funds, but a number of exclusions and exemptions limit the final rules’Volcker Rule’s extraterritorial reach. In the second half of 2019, rules were adopted amending certain aspects of the Volcker Rule, including the Volcker Rule definition of proprietary trading and certain compliance program requirements. In January 2020, additional amendments were proposed to the covered funds portion of the Volcker Rule and a final rule implementing the proposal was adopted in June 2020.

TheUnder the Dodd-Frank Act, provides regulators with tools to imposethe Federal Reserve Board has imposed greater capital, leverage and liquidity requirements and other heightened prudential standards particularly for financial institutions that pose significant systemic risk and bank holding companies with assets of $50 billion or more.and foreign banking organizations that exceed certain thresholds. In imposing heightened prudential standards onnon-U.S. financial institutions foreign banking organizations such as us and SMBC, the Federal Reserve Board is directed to take into account the principle of national treatment and equality of competitive opportunity, and the extent to which thenon-U.S. bank holding company is subject to comparable home country standards.

In 2014, the Federal Reserve Board adopted final rules that apply enhanced prudential standards to the U.S. operations of largenon-U.S. foreign banking organizations (“EPS Rules”), including us. The final rules became effective on July 1, 2016, andEPS Rules require each of certain largenon-U.S.foreign banking organizations, such as us, to certify that it isthey are subject to home country capital standards that are broadly consistent with the Basel capital framework, including Basel III;

conduct home country capital stress tests that

are comparable to U.S. standards; comply with a certain liquidity requirements, including, among other things, a U.S. liquidity buffer requirement for its U.S. branches and agencies based on the results of internal liquidity stress testing; and establish a U.S. risk committee that periodically reviews the risk management policies and oversees the risk management framework of its U.S. operations.

Under the final rules,non-U.S. The EPS Rules also require foreign banking organizations with combined U.S. assets (excluding assets held by its U.S. branches and agencies) of $50 billion or more are required to establish a separately capitalizedtop-tier U.S. intermediate holding company. However,We are not subject to this requirement does not apply to us because we do not meet this threshold. Although proposed rulesthreshold, but we have been released,established SMBCAH in consideration of this requirement. The Federal Reserve Board finalized amendments to the final rulesEPS Rules in October 2019 to revise the thresholds for total consolidated assets at which the enhanced prudential standards apply (“Tailoring Amendments”), but the Tailoring Amendments did not significantly change the requirements under the EPS Rules that are applicable to us.

In June 2018, as part of the implementation of the EPS Rules, the Federal Reserve Board published a rule, which was subsequently amended by the Tailoring Amendments, implementing single counterparty credit limits (“SCCL”) applicable to the U.S. operations of certain foreign banking organizations, such as us. The SCCL rule, being applied from July 1, 2021, in general imposes limitations on net credit exposures to individual counterparties (aggregated based on affiliation) as a percentage of Tier 1 capital. We may comply with the SCCL rule by certifying to the Federal Reserve Board that we comply with a home country regime (“Home Country SCCL”) on a consolidated basis that is consistent with the Large Exposures Framework published by the Basel Committee going forward. New Japanese Home Country SCCL, which was implemented from April 1, 2020, is intended to be consistent with the Large Exposures Framework, and we intend to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s SCCL rule through substituted compliance. Although a proposed rule has been released in 2012, a final rule for an early remediation haveframework applicable to foreign banking organizations under Section 166 of the Dodd-Frank Act has yet to be promulgated.promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board.

The Dodd-Frank Act removed a longstanding prohibition on the payment of interest on demand deposits bythat was applicable to banking entities such as Manufacturers Bank and SMBC’s three branches in the United States. In addition, Manufacturers Bank and SMBC’s three branches in the Dodd-Frank Act requires that theUnited States are subject to federal lending limits that take into account credit exposure arising from derivative transactions and securities lending, securities borrowing, and repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements with counterparties. In 2013, the OCC adopted the final rules that implement these new lending limits, and our New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco branches must comply with these limits, in addition to existingcounterparties as well as state lending limits that apply to the branches. Additionally, as a California state-chartered bank, Manufacturers Bank is subject to state lending limits, which also apply to credit exposure arising from derivative transactions.limits.

The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for an extensive framework for the regulation of OTC derivatives, including mandatory clearing, exchange trading and transaction reporting of certain OTC derivatives. In 2012, the final joint rules of the CFTC and the SEC that further define “swap” and “security based swap” became effective. As a result,addition, certain entities are required to register with the CFTC as “swap dealers” or “major swap participants” and ouror with the SEC as “security-based swap dealers” or “major security-based swap participants.” Our subsidiary, SMBC Capital Markets, Inc., becameis provisionally registered as a swap dealer on December 31, 2012. Mandatorydealer. There are various mandatory clearing, trade execution and reporting requirements for swaps took effect in 2013. Registrationswaps. We do not currently expect to register any entity with the SEC as a security-based swap dealer is not required until the SEC finalizes certainor major security-based swap rules that are still in proposed form.participant.

Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC to establish rules requiring issuers with listed securities, which may includenon-U.S. private issuers such as us, to establish a “clawback” policy to recoup previously awarded compensation in the event of an accounting restatement. The Dodd-Frank Act also grants the SEC discretionary rule-making authority to impose a new fiduciary standard on brokers, dealers and investment advisers, and expands the extraterritorial jurisdiction of U.S. courts over actions brought by the SEC or the United States with respect to violations of the antifraud provisions in the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed into law the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which is the first significant legislative reform of the Dodd Frank Act. Although this legislation makes changes to several major provisions of the Dodd Frank Act, the changes mainly relate to smaller U.S. banks and to U.S. bank holding companies, and have we expected them to limited effect upon the SMBC Group.

Laws Prohibiting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

The Bank Secrecy Act / USA PATRIOT Act of 2001Anti-Money Laundering Regulation in the U.S.

The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (“PATRIOT Act”) and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 contains measures to prevent and detect the financing of terrorism and

international money laundering by imposing significant compliance and due diligence obligations, creating crimes, providing for penalties and expanding the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States. The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended, imposes anti-money

laundering compliance obligations on U.S. financial institutions, including the U.S. offices of foreign banks. The passage of the PATRIOT Act and other events have resulted in heightened scrutiny of compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering rules by federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities. Certain provisions of the PATRIOT Act expired in June 2015 and were extended in part by the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015, enacted in June 2015.

U.S. Sanctions Targeting Iran Related Activities

Starting in 2010, the U.S. government implemented various sanctions targetingnon-U.S. parties that engage in specified Iran-related activities. Various statutes, Executive Orders and regulations, including the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010 (which, among other things, amended the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996,1996), Section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Executive Orders 13622 and 13645, the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, and the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012, authorize or authorized the imposition of sanctions on parties that engage in, among other things, certain activities relating to Iran’s energy, petroleum, metals, shipping or shipbuilding sectors or that facilitate “significant” transactions or provide “significant financial services” for certain Iran-linked individuals or entities or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Persons engaged in targeted activities involving Iran face exposure to secondary sanctions or enforcement actions under U.S. law. It is SMBC’s policy not to conduct activities that are impermissible under secondary sanctions.

Prior to U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA (discussed below), the United States along with the European Union provided Iran with certain sanctions relief. On Implementation Day, the United StatesU.S. government revoked certain Iran-related Executive Orders, temporarily waived certain statutory provisions (in certain cases, extending temporary sanctions waivers that had previously been in effect), and removed various individuals and entities from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (the “SDN List”) maintained by OFAC. However, U.S. persons continued to be generally prohibited from engaging in transactions involving Iran. In addition, certain U.S. secondary sanctions targeting Iran remained in effect, including those targeting significant transactions involving Iranian or Iran-related SDNs or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

In November 2018, following certain wind-down periods, the United States fully Non-U.S.re-imposed financial institutionssanctions (both primary and secondary) that had been waived or lifted under the JCPOA. On the same day, OFAC added back to the SDN List a number of parties that had been removed on Implementation Day from the list. Persons engaged in sanctionable activity could lose their abilitytargeted activities involving Iran face exposure to opensecondary sanctions or maintain correspondent or payable-through accounts withenforcement actions under U.S. financial institutions, among other possible sanctions.law. It is SMBC’s policy not to conduct activities that are impermissible under secondary sanctions. Additionally, in 2019 and 2020, former President Trump issued further Iran-related Executive Orders, including orders authorizing sanctions with respect to additional sectors of the Iranian economy, including metals, mining, manufacturing, textiles, construction, and other sectors identified by the Secretary of the Treasury. Pursuant to one of these orders, Executive Order 13902, on October 8, 2020, the Secretary of the Treasury identified the financial sector of the Iranian economy as subject to sanctions and OFAC added 18 major Iranian banks to the SDN List. As a result of this action, non-U.S. financial institutions that engage in non-humanitarian transactions involving the listed 18 banks may be targeted by secondary sanctions.

On May 8, 2018, President Trump announcedAfter a transition period in which certain countries, including Japan, were granted temporary “significant reduction exceptions” that he was terminatingpermitted some purchases of oil from Iran to continue without risking sanctions, the United States’ participation in the JCPOA and issued a National Security Presidential Memorandum directing his administration to immediately begin the process ofStates also fullyre-imposing sanctions that target critical sectors of Iran’s economy, including the energy, petrochemical, and financial sectors. This includes the resumption of U.S. resumed efforts to reduce Iran’s crude oil sales, which will be backed by the potential threat of correspondent account sanctions targeting foreign financial institutions onceinstitutions. These exceptions expired in May 2019 without further extension.

President Biden has signaled a willingness to resume U.S. participation in the applicable wind-down period has ended, subject (as beforeJCPOA, and in April 2021, the JCPOA)parties to exceptions from such sanctionsthe JCPOA began negotiations as to the steps required for countries determined by the U.S. State Department to have significantly reduced purchases of crude oil from Iran. Depending on the particular sanctions measure,both the United States provides for either a90-day or180-day period from May 8, 2018 in which activities permitted under or consistentand Iran to come back into compliance with the JCPOA can be wound down. FollowingJCPOA. As of June 29, 2021, these negotiations have not been concluded, and the conclusion of the applicable wind-down period, persons engagedsanctions described above remain in such activities involving Iran will face exposure to secondary sanctions or enforcement actions under U.S. law. Additionally, the U.S. government has indicated that no later than November 5, 2018, the U.S. government willre-impose, as appropriate, sanctions on persons removed on Implementation Day from the SDN List or other sanctions lists.full effect.

Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014, as Amended

In order to deter the Russian government from further destabilizing and invading Ukraine, the U.S. government enacted H.R. 5859, the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (signed into law on December 18, 2014). Among other things, the Act, as amended by the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (signed into law onin August 2017), mandates prohibitions or strict limitations on the opening or maintaining of correspondent or payable-through accounts in the United States bynon-U.S. financial institutions

determined by the U.S. government (i) to have knowingly engaged in on or after December 18, 2014 in significant transactions involving certain activities described in the Act, including those involving individuals or entities on whom sanctions are imposed pursuant to the Act for making a significant investment in a project for the extraction of deepwater, Arctic offshore or shale formation crude oil in Russia, or (ii) to have knowingly facilitated, on or after June 16, 2015, a significant financial transaction on behalf of any Russian individual or entity included on the SDN List pursuant to Ukraine-related sanction programs.

U.S. Sanctions Relating to China

The United States government has imposed sanctions and other restrictive measures, and taken other steps, in response to a number of concerns with the actions and policies of the Chinese government. In response to Chinese actions to limit the autonomy of Hong Kong, the U.S. government enacted the Hong Kong Autonomy Act (signed into law on July 14, 2020) which is implemented by Executive Order 13936. Among other things, the Act provides for the imposition of asset-blocking sanctions against any non-U.S. persons determined to be materially contributing to, have materially contributed to, or have attempted to materially contribute to the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration or Hong Kong’s Basic Law. The Act also mandates the imposition of sanctions against non-U.S. financial institutions determined by the U.S. government to have knowingly conducted a significant transaction involving persons sanctioned under the Act. The U.S. State and Treasury Departments are required to periodically submit reports to Congress identifying non-U.S. persons and non-U.S. financial institutions sanctioned under the Act. To date, 34 foreign persons (principally Chinese and Hong Kong government and security officials) have been identified as subject to asset-blocking sanctions under the Act and Executive Order 13936. No non-U.S. financial institutions have been determined to be subject to sanctions under the Act. The U.S. government has indicated that it will contact any non-U.S. financial institution it believes to be engaged in sanctionable conduct under the Act prior to imposing sanctions against it.

In response to concerns that companies linked to the Chinese military have used access to U.S. capital markets to improve Chinese military and intelligence capabilities, on November 12, 2020, then President Trump issued Executive Order 13959, which was subsequently amended in January 2021 by Executive Order 13974. On June 3, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14032, which further amended Executive Order 13959 to rescind the Trump administration sanctions and replace them with similar restrictions applicable to a modified list of Chinese companies operating in the defense or surveillance technology sectors of the Chinese economy. As amended by Executive Order 14032, Executive Order 13959 prohibits U.S. persons from purchasing or selling publicly traded securities issued by the companies named in the Annex to or designated pursuant to the Order, as well as publicly traded securities that are derivative of or provide investment exposure to such securities. The Order’s prohibitions will become effective with respect to securities of or linked to companies named in the Annex to the Order on August 2, 2021, and take effect 60 days after the date of listing for companies named pursuant to the Order. Executive Order 13959, as amended provides a 365-day period from the date of the relevant company’s listing in or pursuant to the Order during which U.S. persons may purchase or sell affected securities for purposes of divestment.

The United States has also taken steps in response to concerns about Chinese actions in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (“Xinjiang”). Pursuant to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and Executive Order 13818, which authorize the imposition of sanctions against persons in any country determined to be involved in certain human rights abuses, the U.S. government has named a number of Chinese government

officials and entities to the SDN List. The sanctioned entities include the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (“XPCC”) and its subsidiaries. In July 2020, several U.S. government agencies jointly published an advisory concerning risks and considerations for businesses with supply chain exposure to entities engaged in forced labor and other human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The advisory highlights legal, economic, and reputational risks to U.S. and non-U.S. companies with potential exposure in their supply chain to Xinjiang or to facilities outside Xinjiang that use labor or goods from that region and recommends that such businesses implement human rights-related due diligence policies and procedures. While the advisory does not have the force of law, it is possible that it could be supplemented in the future by mandatory regulations.

U.S. Sanctions Relating to Burma

On February 11, 2021, in response to the military coup in Burma, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which authorizes the imposition of sanctions, among others, against persons responsible for undermining democratic processes and institutions in Burma, Burmese government and military officials, and immediate family members of such persons, as well as Burmese government agencies or instrumentalities and entities operating in the defense sector of the Burmese economy or other sectors identified by the Secretary of the Treasury. Pursuant to the Order, OFAC has imposed sanctions on a number of Burmese government and military officials and their associates, as well as on state-owned gem, pearl, and lumber enterprises and state holding companies. Sanctions against additional individuals and entities are possible in the future.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act

Provisions of the U.S. tax law commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), which became effective on July 1, 2014, aims to prevent U.S. persons from hiding their financial assets or evading their U.S. federal income tax obligations by the use of offshore accounts. A foreign financial institution that has entered into an agreement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) pursuant to which it agrees to comply with FATCA, referred to as a “participating foreign financial institution” (“PFFI”), is required to perform specified due diligence, reporting and withholding functions (a “PFFI agreement”). Specifically, under FATCA, a PFFI is required to ascertain the U.S. status of customers through specified due diligence and report certain information annually to the IRS. In cases where customers are not compliant with FATCA, PFFIs are obligated to carry out specified reporting and withholding procedures as prescribed. The consequences for foreign financial institutions that are not compliant with FATCA include being subjected to a 30% withholding tax on certain withholdable payments from U.S. sources and reporting to the IRS.

The United States entered into intergovernmental agreements or reached agreements in substance with more than 100 countries in furtherance of the objectives of FATCA, which modify the operation of FATCA with respect to financial institutions located in those countries. The United States and Japan have entered into an intergovernmental agreement to facilitate the implementation of FATCA pursuant to which Japanese financial institutions (such as us and certain of SMBC Group companies) are directed by the Japanese authorities to register with the IRS and fulfill obligations consistent with those required under a PFFI agreement. We haveare registered with the IRS to becomeas a PFFI. We are committed to complying with FATCA as a PFFI and abiding by the terms of our PFFI agreement with the IRS within the jurisdictions in which we operate and in accordance with the time frame set out by the IRS. We intend to closely monitor FATCA developments and evolving industry practices to ensure continued compliance with FATCA moving forward.FATCA.

Other Regulations in the United States

In the United States, SMBC’s U.S.-registered broker-dealer subsidiary, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc. is regulated by the SEC. Broker-dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including:

 

sales methods;

trade practices among broker-dealers;

 

use and safekeeping of customers’ funds and securities;

 

capital structure;

 

record-keeping;

 

the financing of customers’ purchases; and

 

the conduct of directors, officers and employees.

In addition, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc. is a member of and regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and is regulated by the individual state securities authorities in the states in which it operates. The U.S. government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities authorities

in the United States having jurisdiction over SMBC’s U.S. broker-dealer affiliates, are empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in, among other things, censure, fine, the issuance ofcease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or its directors, officers or employees.

Regulations in Other Jurisdictions

Elsewhere in the world, our operations are subject to regulation and control by local central banks and monetary authorities.

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities or transactions relating to Iran or with individuals or entities designated by the U.S. government under specified Executive Orders, even if those activities are not prohibited by U.S. law and are conducted outside the United States bynon-U.S. affiliates. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2018,2021, one affiliate of SMFG, SMBC, engaged in activities subject to disclosure under Section 13(r). SMBC conducted these activities consistent with its internal policies and procedures, the policies and procedures of SMFG, and applicable laws and regulations, and to the extent they are not sanctionable under U.S. secondary sanctions. SMBC has discontinued activities that have become impermissible or subject to secondary sanctions as a result of changes in applicable laws and regulations.

SMBC issued letters of credit and provided remittance and other settlement services in connection with customers’ trade transactions between Japan and Iran. These transactions principally involved the importation of oil into Japan or exportation of civilian commercial products including medical devices from Japan and were conducted with Iranian banks, including the Central Bank of Iran and one other bank owned by the Government of Iran. SMBC supported a Japanese importing company by paying bills of exchange in connection with imports of crude oil from an Iranian oil companybank owned by the Government of Iran. These transactions did not involve entities or other persons listed on the SDN List at the time of the transaction and did not involve the settlement of U.S. dollar-denominated payments cleared through U.S. banks. SMBC has informed SMFG that it intends to continue to engage in these types of transactions only to the extent permitted under applicable regulations and to the extent they are not sanctionable under U.S. secondary sanctions. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2018,2021, the gross revenue related to these transactions was ¥10.9¥0.5 million, representing about 0.0003%less than 0.0001% of SMFG’s total interest and fee income. SMFG does not allocate direct costs to interest and fee income and therefore does not calculate net profits with respect to these transactions.

SMBC has issued performance bonds and advance payment bonds that supported various projects, including the construction of petroleum plants in Iran. Some of these performance bonds had counterparties that were entities controlled by the Government of Iran. Some of these performance bonds have matured, and SMBC has not renewed and will not renew them unless permitted under applicable regulations and to the extent they are not sanctionable under U.S. secondary sanctions, but SMBC continues to have obligations under the matured performance bonds until they are returned or cancelled by the beneficiaries. SMBC has also received fees from its customers on whose behalf

it issued the performance bonds. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2018,2021, the gross revenue relating to these transactions was ¥21.7¥1.6 million, representing less than 0.0007%0.0001% of SMFG’s total interest and fee income. As noted above, SMFG does not allocate direct costs to interest and fee income and therefore does not calculate net profits with respect to these transactions. SMBC has informed SMFG that it intends to continue to accept fee income from its customers for whose account the performance bonds were issued and to pay the relevant fees to the Iranian banks, to the extent authorized by the Ministry of Finance of Japan or otherwise permitted under applicable regulations, until the bonds are returned or cancelled. However, SMBC strongly urges the relevant customers to ask the beneficiaries to agree to return or cancel the matured performance bonds.

SMBC has frozen an account of an Iranian bank designated under Executive Order 13224 pursuant to Japanese foreign exchange laws, and has frozen the U.S. dollar accounts of all Iranian banks. SMBC still maintains threehas frozen Japanese yen accounts of government-owned Iranian banks, including an account for the Central Bank of Iran, and certainIran; all such accounts were frozen at the time of the designation of the relevant bank under Executive Order 13224 or 13902, as applicable. Certain transactions described in this disclosure were conducted through the use of one of such

accounts. accounts prior to the designation of the relevant bank under Executive Order 13902. These transactions were conducted in accordance with Japanese law, and we do not believe that the transactions were sanctionable under U.S. sanctions that were in effect at the time the transactions occurred. SMBC has discontinued activities that have become impermissible or subject to secondary sanctions as a result of changes in applicable laws and regulations, including transactions involving the Central Bank of Iran whose account has been frozen.

The gross revenue attributable to the accounts of government-owned Iranian banks for the twelve months ended March 31, 2018,2021, was less than ¥0.8 million, representing less than 0.0001% of SMFG’s total interest and fee income. SMFG does not allocate direct costs to interest and fee income and therefore does not calculate net profits with respect to these transactions. SMBC has informed SMFG that it intends to continue to maintain the Iranian accounts described above only to the extent permitted under applicable laws and regulations and to the extent the activities are not targeted by secondary sanctions.

As of the date of this annual report, to our knowledge, there is no other activity for the twelve months ended March 31, 20182021 that requires disclosure under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

4.C.     ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

The following chart presents our corporate structure summary at March 31, 2018.2021.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

(1)

These companies are our associates.associates or joint ventures.

(2)

Chart indicates the classification of SMBC Group companies into each of SMBC Group-wide business segments.

(3)

The Japan Net Bank, Limited changed its corporate name to PayPay Bank Corporation on April 5, 2021.

As the ultimate holding company of the SMBC Group, we are responsible for:

 

group strategy and management;

 

group resource allocation;

group financial accounting;

 

investor relations;

 

capital strategy;

 

group IT strategy;

 

HR management for group executives;

 

group risk management, internal control and compliance;

 

compensation schemes; and

 

efficiently harmonizing our operations on a SMBC Group-wide basis.

Principal Subsidiaries

Our principal subsidiaries at March 31, 20182021 are shown in the list below. We consolidate all entities that we control. We control an entity when we are exposed, or have rights, to variable returns from our involvement with the entity and have the ability to affect those returns through our power over the entity.

Principal domestic subsidiaries

 

Company Name

 Proportion
of Ownership
Interest(1)
 Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
   

Main Business

 Proportion
of Ownership
Interest(1)
 Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
 

Main Business

 (%) (%)     (%) (%) 

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation

  100.0   100.0   Commercial banking  100.0   100.0  Commercial banking

SMBC Trust Bank Ltd.

  100.0   100.0   Trust Banking  100.0   100.0  Trust Banking

SMBC Guarantee Co., Ltd.

  100.0   100.0   Credit guarantee  100.0   100.0  Credit guarantee

Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited

 60.0  60.0   Leasing

SMFL Capital Company, Limited

  100.0   100.0   Leasing

SMBC Nikko Securities Inc.

 100.0  100.0   Securities 100.0  100.0  Securities

Sumitomo Mitsui Card Company, Limited

  65.9   65.9   Credit card  100.0   100.0  Credit card

Cedyna Financial Corporation

  100.0   100.0   Credit card and consumer credit

SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd.

  100.0   100.0  Credit card, consumer credit and installment transaction

SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd.

  100.0   100.0   Consumer lending  100.0   100.0  Consumer lending

SMBC Mobit Co., Ltd.

 100.0  100.0   Consumer lending  100.0   100.0  Consumer lending

SMM Auto Finance, Inc.

  51.0   51.0   Automobile sales financing

SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd.

  100.0   100.0   Collecting agent and factoring

The Japan Research Institute, Limited

  100.0   100.0   System development, data processing, management consulting and economic research  100.0   100.0  System development, data processing, management consulting and economic research

Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited

 

 

60.0

 

 

 

60.0

 

  

Investment advisory and investment trust management

SAKURA KCS Corporation

  47.4   47.4(2)   System engineering and data processing

Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited

  50.1  


 

50.1  Investment management, and investment advisory and agency

Alternative Investment Capital Limited

  60.0   60.0  Investment management and investment advisory

NCore Co., Ltd.

  51.0   51.0   Data processing service and consulting  51.0   51.0  Data processing service and consulting

SMBC Venture Capital Co., Ltd.

  40.0   40.0(2)   Venture capital  40.0   40.0(2)  Venture capital

SMBC Consulting Co., Ltd.

  100.0   100.0   Management consulting and information services  98.3   98.3  Management consulting and information services

Japan Pension Navigator Co., Ltd.

  69.7   69.7   Operational management of defined contribution pension plans  69.7   69.7  Operational management of defined contribution pension plans

 

(1)

Percentages of proportion of ownership interest and proportion of voting rights have been truncated.

(2)These companies are

This company is accounted for as subsidiaries,a subsidiary, despite our holdings of less than 50% of the voting rights, because we are able to govern the financial and operating policies of these companiesthis company under a statute or an agreement, or by designating the majority of the members of the board of directors.agreement.

Principal foreign subsidiaries

 

Company Name

  Country of
Incorporation
  Proportion
of Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
   Main Business  Country of
Incorporation
  Proportion
of Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
 

Main Business

     (%)   (%)         (%)   (%) 

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited

  U.K.   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking

SMBC Bank International plc

  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (China) Limited

  China   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  China   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

PT Bank BTPN Tbk

  Indonesia   98.4    93.5(2)  Commercial banking

SMBC Americas Holdings, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Bank holding company

Manufacturers Bank

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Banco Sumitomo Mitsui Brasileiro S.A.

  Brazil   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Brazil   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

JSC Sumitomo Mitsui Rus Bank

  Russia   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Russia   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsui Indonesia

  Indonesia   98.4    98.4   Commercial banking

SMBC Bank EU AG

  Germany   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Malaysia Berhad

  Malaysia   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Malaysia   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Leasing  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Leasing

SMBC Aviation Capital Limited

  Ireland   90.0    90.0   Leasing

SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Securities  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Securities

SMBC Nikko Capital Markets Limited

  U.K.   100.0    100.0   Securities  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Securities

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Derivatives  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Derivatives

TT International Asset Management Ltd

  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Investment management, and investment advisory and agency

 

(1)

Percentages of proportion of ownership interest and proportion of voting rights have been truncated.

(2)

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, we disposed of 4.9% equity interest in PT Bank BTPN Tbk to a third party investor. The disposal was undertaken to ensure that PT Bank BTPN Tbk is compliant with the free float requirement under the Indonesia Stock Exchange’s Rule. We had also entered into a commercial arrangement where the economic exposure resulting from the disposal is being retained. Therefore the disposal has not resulted in a decrease in our ownership interests.

4.D.    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The assets for rent we own for the purpose of operating leases mainly consist of aircraft for the leasing business. We own or lease the land and buildings in which we conduct our business. Most of the property that we operate in Japan is owned by us to be used by our branches. In contrast, our international operations are conducted out of leased premises. Our head office building in Marunouchi is leased from a third party. Our largest property is SMBC’s East Tower in Marunouchi, with a net carrying value of ¥172¥167 billion, including the land and building, at March 31, 2018.2021.

The following table shows the net carrying amount of our tangible fixed assets at March 31, 2018.2021.

 

   At March 31, 20182021 
   (In millions) 

Assets for rent

  ¥580,687437,735 

Land

   459,567487,660 

Buildings

   331,997363,963 

LeasedRight of use assets

   6,149373,002 

Others

   131,73292,301 
  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥1,510,1321,754,661 
  

 

 

 

For more information, see Note 12 “Property, Plant and Equipment” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

The total area of land related to our material office and other properties at March 31, 20182021 was approximately 703,000642,000 square meters for owned land and approximately 14,000 square meters for leased land.

We are not aware of any material environmental issues that may affect the utilization of our assets.

Item 4A.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

Item 5.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

The discussion below should be read together with “Item 3.A. Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. Unless otherwise indicated, we present our information on a consolidated basis.

OVERVIEW

Operating Environment

Our results of operations and financial condition are significantly affected by developments in Japan as well as the global economy.

ForThe Japanese economy deteriorated rapidly for the period from April to June 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It recovered gradually for the period from July to December 2020, reflecting the gradual resumption of business activities in Japan and overseas. However, it was at a standstill for the period from January to March 2021, resulting from the upward trend in new cases of COVID-19 and the reintroduction of restrictive measures.

Japanese gross domestic product (“GDP”) decreased by 4.6% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, Japanese gross domestic product (“GDP”) increased by 1.6%,2021, compared with an increasea decrease of 1.2%0.5% in the previous fiscal year, based on data published in June 20182021 by the Cabinet Office of the Government of Japan. The consumer price index for Japan (all items, less fresh food) (“CPI”) decreased by 0.4% for the same period, compared with an increase of 0.6% in the previous fiscal year, based on data published in April 2021 by the Statistics Bureau of Japan.

ForThe following table presents quarter-on-quarter growth rates of Japanese GDP during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2020 and 2021.

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2020  2021 
   1Q  2Q  3Q  4Q  1Q  2Q  3Q  4Q 

Japanese GDP

   0.1  0.1  (1.9%)   (0.5%)   (8.1%)   5.3  2.8  (1.0%) 

Japanese GDP declined sharply for the Japanese economy continuedfirst quarter ended June 30, 2020, primarily due to recover gradually. The decreases in private consumption resulting from the voluntary restraint on social and business activities and exports of goods and services caused by the downturn in overseas economies and a sharp decline in foreign tourist spending, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. It recovered gradually from the second quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the third quarter ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to increases in private consumption and exports of goods and services resulting from the resumption of business activities in Japan and overseas. However, for the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2021, the quarter-on-quarter growth rate of Japanese GDP was 0.5% for the period from April to June 2017,negative, primarily due to an increasea decrease in private consumption. Forconsumption resulting from the period from Julyupward trend in new cases of COVID-19 and the reintroduction of restrictive measures.

Although the employment situation weakened due to September 2017, Japanese GDP increasedthe COVID-19 pandemic, it has subsequently remained stable. The active job openings-to-applicants ratio published by 0.5%the Ministry of Health, Labour and

Welfare of Japan continued to decline for the first half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, but showed some signs of improvement for the second half of the fiscal year. According to the statistical data published by the Statistics Bureau of Japan, the unemployment rate, which fell to 2.2% in December 2019, rose with the spread of COVID-19 to 3.1% in October 2020. Subsequently it fell to 2.6% in March 2021. Compensation of employees decreased by 3.5% on a quarter-on-quarter basis reflecting the improvement in exports of goods and services. For the period from October to December 2017, Japanese GDP increased by 0.3% on a quarter-on-quarter basis with private consumption increasing. However, for the period from January to March 2018, Japanese GDP decreased by 0.2% onfirst quarter ended June 30, 2020 and it then recovered gradually. As a quarter-on-quarter basis.

Private consumption, which accounts for about 56%result, its rate of Japanese GDP, increased by 0.9%decrease was 2.1% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, reflecting the steady improvement in the employment and income situation. For the period from April to June 2017, it increased by 0.7% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. However, it decreased by 0.7% on a quarter-on-quarter basis for the period from July to September 2017. This is partly due to a temporary correction to the rapid increase in the previous quarter and the negative impact of unusual weather conditions on private consumption. Although, it increased by 0.3% on a quarter-on-quarter basis for the period from October to December 2017, it decreased by 0.1% on a quarter-on-quarter basis for the period from January to March 2018.

Private investment, which accounts for about 19% of Japanese GDP, consists of capital investments by business and private residential investments. Capital investments by business increased by 3.2% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, since corporate earnings remained at a high level. For the period from April to June 2017, capital investments by business increased by 0.9% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. For the periods from July to September 2017 and October to December 2017, they increased, on a quarter-on-quarter basis, by 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively. Thereafter, for the period from January to March 2018, they increased by 0.3% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Private residential investments decreased by 0.3% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. For the period from April to June 2017, they increased by 0.9% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. However, for the periods from July to September 2017 and October to December 2017, they decreased, on a quarter-on-quarter basis, by 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively, reflecting the downward trend of both the number of dwelling units and the area of floor space for construction starts of dwellings in the second half of the previous fiscal year. Then, for the period from January to March 2018, they decreased by 1.8% on a quarter-on-quarter basis.

Changes in private inventories contributed Japanese GDP growth by 0.1 percentage points for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. For the period from April to June 2017, they pulled down Japanese GDP growth by 0.1 percentage points on a quarter-on-quarter basis. However, they contributed Japanese GDP growth, on aquarter-on-quarter basis, by 0.4 percentage points for the period from July to September 2017 and by 0.2 percentage points for

the period from October to December 2017, respectively. Thereafter, for the period from January to March 2018, they pulled down Japanese GDP growth by 0.2 percentage points on a quarter-on-quarter basis.

The ratio of exports of goods and services to Japanese GDP was about 17%, and exports of goods and services increased by 6.2% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. For the period from April to June 2017, they decreased by 0.1% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. However, for the periods from July to September 2017 and October to December 2017, they increased, on a quarter-on-quarter basis, by 2.0% and 2.2%, respectively, primarily due to the recovery of exports to some Asian countries. Thereafter, for the period from January to March 2018, they increased by 0.6% on a quarter-on-quarter basis.

Imports of goods and services were subtracted in calculating Japanese GDP. The ratio of imports of goods and services to Japanese GDP was about 17%, and imports of goods and services increased by 4.0% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. For the period from April to June 2017, they increased by 1.8% on a quarter-on-quarter basis, reflecting robust private consumption. Although they decreased by 1.3% on aquarter-on-quarter basis for the period from July to September 2017, they increased by 3.1% on aquarter-on-quarter basis for the period from October to December 2017. Thereafter, for the period from January to March 2018, they increased by 0.3% on aquarter-on-quarter basis.

Industrial production, as a whole, increased moderately throughout the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, reflecting the increase in domestic and foreign demand.

The employment situation continued to improve during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, reflecting a growing labor shortage. The active jobopenings-to-applicants ratio continued to steadily improve. In addition, the unemployment rate remained relatively low, and it was 2.5% in March 2018, a decrease of 0.3 percentage points from the same month of the previous year, based on the Labor Force Survey by the Statistics Bureau in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Compensation of employees increased by 1.7% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, reflecting the current employment situation. This was the third consecutive year that compensation of employees increased.2021.

Further, according to Teikoku Databank, a research institution in Japan, there were approximately 8,3007,300 corporate bankruptcies in Japan during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, an increase2021, a decrease of 1.6%13.8% from the previous fiscal year, involving approximately ¥1.7¥1.2 trillion in total liabilities, a decrease of 13.0%0.1% from the previous fiscal year.

Interest rates in Japanese financial and capital markets are affected by the monetary policy measures of the BOJ.Bank of Japan (“BOJ”). In January 2016, in addition to the existing provision of ample funds, the BOJ introducedannounced the introduction of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with a negative interest rate” as partrate.” Thereafter, the BOJ announced the introduction of its “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing,” anda new policy framework, “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with yield curve control.”control” in September 2016. Under this policy framework, the BOJ would keep short-term interest rates down by maintaining its policy of applying a negative interest rate of minus 0.1% to certain excess reserves of financial institutions held at the BOJ. Moreover, the BOJ indicated it would purchase Japanese government bonds so that the yield of the10-year Japanese government bonds would be close to around 0% to control long-term interest rates. In July 2018, the BOJ decided to introduce forward guidance for policy rates with a view to persistently continuing with powerful monetary easing. Further, in October 2019, the BOJ amended its forward guidance to indicate that it expects short- and long-term interest rates to remain at or below their present levels so long as the BOJ believes it is necessary to pay close attention to the possibility of a loss in momentum toward achieving its 2% price stability target. In March 2020, the BOJ announced “enhancement of monetary easing in light of the impact of the outbreak of COVID-19.” The BOJ stated in this announcement that it decided to enhance monetary easing with a view to doing its utmost to ensure smooth corporate financing and maintaining stability in financial markets, thereby preventing firms’ and households’ sentiment from deteriorating. Thereafter, on April 27, 2020 and May 22, 2020, the BOJ decided to further enhance monetary easing and introduce measures to support corporate financing taking into account the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Japanese economic conditions. Moreover, on March 19, 2021, the BOJ announced the establishment of a scheme to apply interest rates, which would be linked to the short-term policy interest rate, as an incentive to a certain amount of financial institutions’ current account balances, based on the recognition of the importance of continuing with monetary easing in a sustainable manner and making nimble and effective responses to counter changes in developments in economic activity and prices, as well as in financial conditions. In addition, the BOJ made clear that the range of the 10-year Japanese government bonds yield fluctuations would be between around plus and minus 0.25% from the target level. Under such circumstances, the uncollateralized overnight call rate, which is the benchmark short-term interest rate, remained negative for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. The yield on newly issued Japanese government bonds with a maturity of 10 years, which is the benchmark long-term interest rate, was at around 0% for the same period.

The yen depreciated against the U.S. dollar from ¥108.42 at March 31, 2020 to ¥110.74 at March 31, 2021, according to the statistical data published by the BOJ.

The Nikkei Stock Average, which is a price-weighted average of 225 stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section, rose from ¥18,909.26¥18,917.01 to ¥30,467.75 at March 31, 2017 to ¥24,124.15 at January 23, 2018,February 16, 2021, its highest closing level since November 1991.August 1990. However, it then dropped to ¥21,454.30 at March 30, 2018.

The yen appreciated against the U.S. dollar from ¥111.80¥29,178.80 at March 31, 20172021.

According to ¥106.19 at March 30, 2018, according to the statistical dataa report published by the BOJ.Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, the average residential land price and the average commercial land price in Japan increased by 0.8% and 3.1%, respectively, in the calendar year 2020.

The global economy asdeteriorated owing to the COVID-19 pandemic for the period from April to June 2020. Thereafter, it recovered gradually, reflecting the resumption of business activities around the world in general. However, in some countries and regions where new cases of COVID-19 had been on an upward trend, the pace of the recovery slowed down, primarily due to restraints on economic activity caused by reintroduction of restrictive measures.

The U.S. economy deteriorated rapidly for the period from April to June 2020, primarily due to declines in private consumption, business fixed investment and exports of goods and services affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thereafter, it recovered gradually for the period from July 2020 to March 2021, primarily due to an increase in private consumption and business fixed investment, reflecting the gradual recovery of business activities. Economic growth in Europe showed a whole,sharp decline for the period from April to June 2020. This was primarily due to decreases in private consumption resulting from the restraint on movement and exports of goods and services caused by a decline in foreign tourist spending, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the gradual resumption of business activities, the European economy recovered initially. However, it was at a standstill thereafter, reflecting the upward trend in new cases of COVID-19 and the reintroduction of restrictive measures. In Asia, the Chinese economy was picking up with the resumption of business activities from April 2020. Asian economies other than China continued to recover gradually forslow down due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but some of them showed some signs of recovery or bottoming out during the second half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, the U.S. economy continued to recover, supported by robust private consumption, reflecting the gradual improvement in the employment and income situation. The European economy continued to recover steadily for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. On the other hand, the Chinese economy, as a whole, was picking up gradually for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, although it showed some signs of slowing down in the middle of the fiscal year. The growth momentum in other Asian economies showed some signs of picking up for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021.

In addition to economic factors and conditions, we expect that our results of operations and financial condition will be significantly affected by regulatory trends such as Japanese TLAC Standards, the Basel III reforms and the Dodd-Frank Act. For a more detailed description of regulations to which we are subject, risks associated with regulatory development and our management policy under this environment, see “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business,” “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan, Regulations in the United States, Regulations in Other Jurisdictions and Description of Operations and Principal Activities—Management Policies.”

SMBC Group’s Response to COVID-19

Since December 2019, COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the implementation of numerous measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as restrictions on movement and closures of schools, businesses, factories and other public and private facilities in many countries and regions. These measures significantly have affected people’s lives and business activities. Coupled with these measures, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on both Japanese and global economic conditions. In Japan, a state of emergency was declared for all prefectures in April 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and economic activity shrank as a result of requests for voluntary restraint on movement and business closure requests to commercial facilities. Under these circumstances, the Japanese government approved “Emergency Economic Measures in Response to COVID-19” to protect the lives and lifestyles of the public and move toward economic recovery. The state of emergency in Japan was lifted in all prefectures in May 2020, and business activities had been resumed gradually. Although new cases of COVID-19 had remained at a relatively low level for several months, they increased rapidly from November 2020. Due to the rapid increases, a second state of emergency was declared for several prefectures including Tokyo. Thereafter, it was lifted by March 2021.

Global new cases of COVID-19, including several new variants of the virus, increased in April 2021 and then turned downward according to “COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update” issued by the World Health Organization. In Japan, based on the upward trend in new cases in April 2021, stricter COVID-19 measures were re-imposed for some prefectures including Tokyo, but such measures have been partially relaxed as new cases decreased. Moreover, COVID-19 vaccination has already begun in many countries. However, there remains uncertainty whether vaccines will be produced, distributed and administered as expected, and effective against new variants of COVID-19. Therefore, it is difficult to predict the evolution of COVID-19 and its impact on the global economy, including the effect of various measures made by each government, and the extent of the continuing impact on our operational and financial performance remains uncertain.

Considering the significant impact on people’s lives and the economy caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we strive to ensure the health and safety of our customers and employees. Furthermore, the SMBC Group supports our customers through financial services and is committed to contributing to local communities and society including support of the medical industry.

Support for Customers through Financial Services

For our clients, the SMBC Group, as a financial institution which is a part of the social infrastructure, fulfills our responsibility by continuing to provide services such as financing and settlement. In Japan, we have kept all SMBC branches open and ATMs accessible. We have also offered flexible responses to urgent financial needs and requests for new loans and changes in loan terms and conditions. In addition to the above, we launched a new investment fund to support medical-related venture companies in Japan in order to contribute to solving social issues that have become apparent due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevention of the Spread of Infection and Initiatives for Continuous Business Operation

For our employees, in addition to maintaining employment and salary, we promote teleworking capabilities and conduct operations by separating staff into two or more teams on alternating shifts. By thoroughly implementing infection prevention and control measures in branches and offices, we are continuing our operations. We are also giving consideration to the physical and mental health of our employees by establishing a consultation counter to support our employees who are concerned about their physical and/or mental health.

Contributing to Local Communities and Society

In order to contribute to the soundness of the local community and society, we are supporting medical institutions and related organizations who are working to prevent the spread of COVID-19 or establish an effective method of treating the virus. In addition, we are supporting organizations involved in philanthropic and humanitarian initiatives, the enhancement of education and social welfare, and the revival of culture and the arts. As part of such efforts, we have been providing donations to medical institutions and related organizations, as well as to organizations involved in philanthropic activities.

Factors Affecting Results of Operation

Income (Loss)

We have three principal sources of operating income: net interest income, net fee and commission income, and net income from trading/financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss/investment securities.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income, or the difference between interest income and interest expense, is determined by:

 

the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities;

 

the interest spread;

 

the general level of interest rates; and

 

the proportion of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities.

Our principal interest-earning assets are loans and advances, investment securities, and deposits with banks. Our principal interest-bearing liabilities are deposits, borrowings and debt securities in issue. The interest income and expense on trading assets and liabilities and financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are not included in net interest income. Our net interest income is earned mainly by SMBC. SMBC controls its exposure to interest rate fluctuations through asset and liability management operations.

SMBC, like other banks in Japan, makes most domestic loans based on a short-term interest rate, the TIBOR, or a short-term prime rate, which are generally intended to reflect its cost of short-term yen funding and significantly affected by the monetary policy of the BOJ.

The BOJ announced in October 2014 the expansion of its “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing” introduced in April 2013, and in December 2015 the introduction of “supplementary measures for quantitative and qualitative monetary easing,” in order to achieve the price stability target of 2% in terms of theyear-on-year rate of increase in the consumer price index.CPI. In January 2016, in addition to the existing provision of ample funds, the BOJ announced the introduction of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with a negative interest rate” (“negative interest rate policy”), and began to implement a negative interest raterate.” Following the introduction of the policy, in February 2016. Under the negative interest rate policy, the BOJ has adopted a multi-tier system where the outstanding balance of each financial institution’s current account at the BOJ is divided into three tiers, to each of which a positive interest rate, a zero interest rate and a negative interest rate of minus 0.1 percent are applied, respectively. After these policy interest rate changes, SMBC

lowered its ordinary deposit rate by 0.019 percentage points from 0.02% to 0.001% in February 2016. Thereafter, in September 2016, the BOJ announced the introduction of a new policy framework, “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with yield curve control.”control” in September 2016. Under this policy framework, the BOJ indicated it would purchase Japanese government bonds so that the yield of the10-year Japanese government bonds would be close to around 0% to control long-term interest rates. In addition, the BOJ would keep short-term interest rates down by maintaining its policy of applying a negative interest rate of minus 0.1% to certain excess reserves of financial institutions held at the BOJ. Moreover, the BOJ indicated it would purchase Japanese government bonds so that the yield of the 10-year Japanese government bonds would be close to around 0% to control long-term interest rates. In July 2018, the BOJ decided to introduce forward guidance for policy rates with a view to persistently continuing with powerful monetary easing. Further, in October 2019, the BOJ amended its forward guidance to indicate that it expects short- and long-term interest rates to remain at or below their present levels so long as the BOJ believes it is necessary to pay close attention to the possibility of a loss in momentum toward achieving its 2% price stability target. In March 2020, the BOJ announced “enhancement of monetary easing in light of the impact of the outbreak of COVID-19.” The BOJ stated in this announcement that it decided to enhance monetary easing with a view to doing its utmost to ensure smooth corporate financing and maintaining stability in financial markets, thereby preventing firms’ and households’ sentiment from deteriorating. Thereafter, on April 27, 2020 and May 22, 2020, the BOJ decided to further enhance monetary easing and introduce measures to support corporate financing taking into account the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Japanese economic conditions. Moreover, on March 19, 2021, the BOJ announced the establishment of a scheme to apply interest rates, which would be linked to the short-term policy interest rate, as an incentive to a certain amount of financial institutions’ current account balances, based on the recognition of the importance of continuing with monetary easing in a sustainable manner and making nimble and effective responses to counter changes in developments in economic activity and prices, as well as in financial conditions. In addition, the BOJ made clear that the range of the 10-year Japanese government bonds yield fluctuations would be between around plus and minus 0.25% from the target level.

The following table sets forth SMBC’s short-term prime rate, three-month TIBOR, ordinary deposit rate, long-term prime rate andten-year swap rate, at the dates indicated:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 

Short-term prime rate

   1.475 1.475 1.475   1.475 1.475 1.475

Three-month TIBOR

   0.069  0.057  0.099    0.069  0.069  0.069 

Ordinary deposit rate

   0.001  0.001  0.001    0.001  0.001  0.001 

Long-term prime rate

   1.000  0.950  0.950    1.050  0.950  1.000 

Ten-year swap rate

   0.261  0.265  0.149    0.153  0.014  0.111 

It is difficult to earn a wide interest spread when interest rates are at a low level, as they currently are in Japan. When interest rates rise from extremely low levels, interest spreads at commercial banks generally increase. However, interest spreads may temporarily decrease immediately after an increase in interest rates because it may take time for banks to increase lending rates correspondingly, in contrast to their funding rates. After an adjustment period, lending rates generally also increase, and banks are able to secure a wider interest spread than in a low interest rate environment. Conversely, interest spreads may temporarily increase immediately after a decrease in interest rates because it may take time for banks to decrease lending rates

correspondingly, in contrast to their funding rates. After an adjustment period, lending rates generally also decrease, and banks generally are not able to maintain a wide interest spread.

Net Fee and Commission Income. We earn fees and commissions from a variety of services. The primary components of SMBC’s net fee and commission income are fees and commissions related to money remittances and transfers, investment trusts sales, loans (such as loan commitment fees and loan arrangement fees)syndication fees for arranging loans), securities transactions (such as bond trustee fees and bond recording agency fees), and guarantees and acceptances. Other fees and commissions include fees from investment banking and electronic banking.

In addition, we earn a significant amount of fees and commissions fromon transactions in our credit card business,businesses, conducted through Sumitomo Mitsui Card and Cedyna,SMBC Finance Service, and fromfees and commissions on transactions in our securities business,businesses, conducted through SMBC Nikko Securities and SMBC Friend Securities (until January 1, 2018, the date of the merger with SMBC Nikko Securities).Securities. The principal components of Sumitomo Mitsui Card’s and Cedyna’sSMBC Finance Service’s fees and commissions are membership fees from retailers and annual cardholder membership fees,cardholders, while those of SMBC Nikko Securities’ and SMBC Friend Securities’ fees and commissions are subscription and agent commissions from investment trusts sales and underwriting commissions.fees.

The principal factors affecting fees and commissions are the demand for the services provided, the fees charged for those services and fees charged by competitors for similar services. The volume of services provided also affects profitability, as our fee businesses have significant economies of scale. In order to diversify sources of revenue and enhance return on assets, we are expanding our fees and commissions businesses, including sales of investment trusts and life insurance products, and investment banking businesses.

Net Income from Trading/InvestmentTrading/Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss /Investment Securities. We undertake significant trading activities involving a variety of financial instruments, including derivatives. Our income from these activities is subject to volatility caused by, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices or other market variables. Any unexpected change in interest rates could affect the fair value of our interest rate derivative

positions and our net income from trading activities. Net trading income consists of margins made on market-making and our customer business as well as changes in fair value of trading assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments. It also includes net interest and dividend income on these instruments.

We have a variety of financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss including investment trusts and hybrid instruments. Net income from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss includes gains and losses arising from sales, redemptions and changes in the fair value of these financial instruments, and net interest and dividend income on these instruments. The fair values of those instruments such as investment trusts and hybrid instruments are subject to volatility caused by changes in equity prices and interest rates.

We have substantial investments in debt securities asavailable-for-sale financial assets.instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. In particular, Japanese government bonds represent a significant part of our bond portfolio. We also own debt securities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollars. We also have investments in equity securities asavailable-for-sale financial assets,instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, which includeconsist primarily of our strategic shareholding investments in stocks issued by our customers. Net investment income includes the gains and losses arising from the sales or redemptions ofavailable-for-sale financial assets debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and the dividend income earned fromavailable-for-sale equity instruments.instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. Increases in interest rates or declines in equity prices could substantially decrease the fair value of ouravailable-for-sale financial assets.

Operating income from other than these three principal sources is included in “Net income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” or “Other income.” Net income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss includes gains and losses arising from sales and the change in the fair value of the instruments such as hybrid instruments classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. It also includes interest and dividend income on thesethose instruments. Other income consists primarily of income from operating leases conducted by SMFL and income related to IT solution services.

Expenses

Impairment Charges on Financial Assets. We use the expected credit losses (“ECL”) model for the recognition of impairment loss under IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments.” The ECL model requires that impairment

losses be measured by using reasonable and supportable information including forecasts of future economic conditions and in an unbiased and probability-weighted manner. Our impairment charges are recorded primarily due to impairment on loans and advances and on investment securities.advances.

Impairment charges on loans and advances are affected by the economic environment and financial conditions of borrowers. During periods of economic slowdown, corporate and individual borrowers are generally more likely to suffer credit rating downgrades, or become delinquent or default on their borrowings. The slowdown in the domestic or global economy may increase credit costs relating to a wide range of industries.

Declines in market prices for domestic and foreign investment securities may result in our recording impairment charges. We assess at the end of each reporting period whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. In the case of equity instruments classified asavailable-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the instrument below its cost is also considered to be such evidence in determining whether the assets are impaired. If any such evidence exists foravailable-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss, measured as the difference between the cost and the current fair value less any impairment charges on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss, is removed from equity and recognized in profit or loss.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses (salaries and related expenses), depreciation and amortization expenses, and other expenses (rent and lease(outsourcing expenses, premiums for deposit insurance, publicity and advertising expenses, and communication expenses).

Other Expenses. Other expenses consist primarily of cost of operating leases, costs related to IT solution services and IT systems, losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets, and impairment losses of property, plant and equipment.

Unrealized Gains or Losses on Investment Securities Portfolio

Changes in the fair value of domestic and foreign investment securities result in an increase or a decrease in unrealized gains or losses onavailable-for-sale financial assets. investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. Unrealized gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the investmentsdebt instruments in these securities are recognized directly in equity, until they are derecognized or impaired. Unrealized gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the equity instruments in these securities are recognized directly in equity, and amounts presented in equity are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss.

Most of our domestic equity instruments consist of publicly traded Japanese stocks. The Nikkei Stock Average increaseddecreased by 12.8%10.8% from ¥16,758.67¥21,205.81 at March 29, 2019, to ¥18,917.01 at March 31, 2016,2020, and increased by 54.2% to ¥18,909.26¥29,178.80 at March 31, 2017, and increased by 13.5% to ¥21,454.30 at March 30, 2018.2021. At March 31, 2018,2021, we had net unrealized gains on domestic equity securities of ¥2,924,591¥2,527,041 million, an increase of ¥228,469¥962,690 million from ¥2,696,122¥1,564,351 million at March 31, 2017.2020. For more information, see “Item 5.A. Operating Results—Financial Condition—Investment Securities.”

Strengthening of Equity Capital

In response to the imposition of more stringent regulatory capital requirements, we have been taking a proactive approach to managing our risk-weighted capital ratio by focusing on increasing qualifying capital, including by building up our retained earnings, identifying risks, and controlling risk-weighted assets.

Foreign Currency Fluctuations

The average exchange rate used to convert dollars to yen in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 was ¥110.86¥ 106.11 per $1.00, compared to the previous fiscal year’s average exchange rate of ¥108.36¥108.71 per $1.00. The percentage of revenue we earned from our foreign operations for boththe fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017 were 30%2020 was 34%. For more information, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Revenues by Region.”

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

Our financial position and results of operations are influenced by estimates and judgments that management employs in the course of preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We identified the following areas of significant accounting policies to be particularly sensitive in terms of estimates and judgments made by management. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the losses incurred in the loan portfolios at the end of each reporting period. Management exercises judgment in making assumptions and estimations when calculating the allowance for loan losses on both individually and collectively assessed loans.

The allowance for loan losses is measured under the ECL model, where the allowance will be recognized as an amount equal to the expected credit losses over the lifetime of a loan, in case it has experienced a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. The measurement of the allowance requires a number of significant judgments to be applied, such as:

qualitative assessment in determining obligor grades;

determining criteria for individuallya significant impaired loans is estimatedincrease in credit risk;

measuring ECL by management based onchoosing appropriate models and assumptions;

incorporating forward-looking information into the ECL measurement by obligor grading, forecast ranges of macroeconomic scenarios, and additional ECL adjustments if the current circumstances, events or conditions at relevant portfolio level are not fully reflected in the ECL model; and

estimating the expected future cash flows by taking into account factors such as historical loss information, the appropriateness of the borrower’s business plan or operational improvement plan, the status of progress of its plan, the overall support from financial institutions, and the realizable value of any collateral held. The allowance for loan losses is

For the difference betweenfiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the carrying amountobligor grading, macroeconomic factors and additional ECL adjustments used to determine the final ECL reflected the current and forward-looking impact of a loan and the discounted present value of expected future cash flows that are estimated by management. The actual future cash flows may differ from the estimates by management and consequently may cause actual loan losses to differ from the reported allowance for loan losses.COVID-19 pandemic.

The allowance for loan losses for impaired loans that are not individually significant andnon-impaired loans is collectively calculated based on the historical loss experience for loans which have similar credit risk characteristics to those in the current loan portfolio using statistical methods. These statistical methods are subject to estimation uncertainty. In normal circumstances, the use of statistical methods evidenced by historical information provides the most objective methodology in assessing inherent losses on loans with similar credit risk characteristics. However, in certain circumstances, the use of historical loss experience alone may not be representative of current loss experiences and as a result it may provide less relevant information about the loss incurred in a given portfolio at the end of the reporting period, particularly in a situation where there have been

changes in economic conditions. In these circumstances, we make a judgment to update the historical loss experienceobligor grades were reviewed based on the most recent loss information taking into account, among others,available as appropriate. For the effectfiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the obligor grades of many corporate borrowers severely affected by the current economic environment. To estimateCOVID-19 pandemic were downgraded to the extent that the credit risk on loans and advances to such borrowers was determined to be significantly increased since initial recognition and their allowance for loan losses was measured at an amount equal to the lifetime ECL.

The macroeconomic scenarios for incorporating forward-looking information in the ECL measurement were updated, reflecting the recent economic forecasts. Although we understand that there is significant uncertainty in predicting the severity and duration of the non-impairedCOVID-19 loans,pandemic and its impact on the Japanese and global economy, we assumed that the Japanese and global economy will recover from the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022, reflecting the roll-out of vaccines, and reach pre-COVID-19 level by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023. This assumption was considered in determining the base scenario. The extent to which reflects incurredthe premises of the base scenario and past macroeconomic experiences are reflected in determining the upside and downside scenarios was revised to better capture relevant information under the unprecedented conditions experienced during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The following table shows the growth rates of Japanese and global GDP, which are the key factors in the macroeconomic scenarios, under the base scenario.

   For the fiscal year ending
March 31,
 
   2022   2023 
   (%) 

Japanese GDP

   3.3    2.0 

Global GDP

   5.6    3.9 

In determining the need for making additional ECL adjustments, we considered whether there is an increased credit risk for some portfolios on which the COVID-19 pandemic would have a material adverse impact but where the impact was not yet identifiedfully incorporated in the ECL model. This included the consideration of the temporary impact on probability of default of various measures taken by governments. We evaluated the forward-looking impact on credit risks and losses of certain industry-related portfolios selected based on changes in factors such as the market conditions and bankruptcy trends as a result of the reduction in economic activity by

requests for the period between the impairment occurringvoluntary restraint on movement and the loss being identified, management develops assumptions and methodologiesbusiness closure requests to estimate the loss identification period.commercial facilities. As a consequence, we decided to make additional ECL adjustments for portfolios related to some industries.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time as the economic environment changes or new information becomes available. Changes in these estimates and judgments will result in a different allowance for loan losses and may have a direct impact on impairment charges. Impairment charges on loans and advances amountingAllowance for loan losses amounted to ¥126,623 million, ¥141,457¥849,287 million and ¥118,750¥706,405 million were recognized for the fiscal years endedat March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Some of our financial instruments are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss, such as trading assets and liabilities, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and derivative financial instruments.Available-for-sale financial assets are also measuredinstruments, investment securities at fair value with changes inthrough other comprehensive income and financial liabilities designated at fair value reported in other comprehensive income.through profit or loss.

The fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are mostly valued based on quoted prices in active markets, or using valuation techniques that incorporate inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are observable either directly or indirectly in the market, including dealers’ quotes. We principally use valuation techniques that are commonly used by market participants to price the instruments. To the extent practical, the valuation models make maximum use of observable data. However, for certain financial assets and liabilities, the fair values are measured by using valuation techniques with significant unobservable inputs. In such cases, significant management estimates are made, resulting in a less objective measurement of fair value.

The risk management departments in each subsidiary regularly review significant valuation methodologies and recalibrate model parameters and inputs, both observable and unobservable, in an effort to ensure an appropriate estimation of fair value has been made. Where significant management judgments are required in valuation, we establish a valuation control framework to validate the valuation models and fair values calculated based on such valuation models. Under the framework, the accounting department is responsible for ensuring that the accounting policies and procedures to determine the fair values are in compliance with the relevant accounting standards.

If the fair value at the trade date, which is measured using a valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs, differs from the transaction price, any gain or loss on the trade date is adjusted to be deferred. Management judgment is required to determine whether significant unobservable inputs exist in the valuation technique.

The financial assets and liabilities are classified into one of three levels within a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

  

Level 1. Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date;

 

  

Level 2. Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

 

  

Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Management judgment is involved in determining the level of hierarchy to which each financial instrument should be categorized and in periodical assessments of market liquidity for inputs and price transparency.

In addition to the fair value hierarchy disclosure, we provide a sensitivity analysis of the impact on the Level 3 financial instruments carried at fair value by using reasonably possible alternatives for the unobservable

parameters in Note 4344 “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The determination of reasonably possible alternatives requires significant management judgment.

Impairment ofAvailable-for-sale Financial Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported inavailable-for-sale financial assets reserve as a separate component of equity until the financial assets are either derecognized or become impaired. If there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of loss events which have an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial assets that can be reliably estimated, the cumulative loss previously recognized in equity is removed and recognized in profit or loss as an impairment charge.

We exercise judgment in determining whether there is objective evidence of occurrence of loss events which result in a decrease in estimated future cash flows. The estimation of future cash flows also requires judgment. In the assessment of impairment ofavailable-for-sale equity instruments, we also consider whether there has been a significant or prolonged decline in fair value below their cost. The determination of what is a significant or prolonged decline requires management judgment.

Impairment may occur when there is objective evidence of deterioration in the financial conditions of the investee, industry and sector performance, or changes in operating and financing cash flows. The determination of impairment in this respect also includes significant management judgment.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time upon future events that may or may not occur and changes in these estimates and judgments could adversely affect the carrying amounts ofavailable-for-sale financial assets. Impairment charges onavailable-for-sale financial assets reclassified from equity to profit or loss totaled ¥10,185 million, ¥71,510 million and ¥29,606 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Impairment of Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may be impaired. The first step of the impairment test is identifying the cash-generating units (“CGUs”), which represent the smallest identifiable groups of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. Goodwill is then allocated to the CGUs, considering how the goodwill is recognized and other relevant factors.

In the impairment test, the carrying amount of the CGU to which goodwill is allocated is compared against its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Such recoverable amounts are determined based on significant management judgments and assumptions.

We determine the recoverable amount using the estimated future cash flows,pre-tax discount rates, growth rates and other factors. The estimation of future cash flows inherently reflects management judgments, even though such forecasts are prepared taking into account actual past performance and external economic data. Thepre-tax discount rates and growth rates may be significantly affected by market interest rates or other market conditions, which are beyond management’s control, and therefore significant management judgments are made to determine these assumptions.

These management judgments are made based on the facts and circumstances at the time of the impairment test, and may vary depending on the situation and time. Changes in management judgments may result in

different impairment test results and different impairment losses recognized. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, impairment losses on goodwill were ¥28,607 million, ¥74,616¥42,398 million and ¥1,124nil, respectively.

Impairment of Other Intangible Assets

We have other intangible assets, not including goodwill, which consist of software, contractual customer relationships, trademarks and others. These are divided into other amortizing intangible assets and other non-amortizing intangible assets. Other amortizing intangible assets are tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable at the end of each reporting period. Other non-amortizing intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, then its recoverable amount is estimated. The process to determine the recoverable amount is inherently uncertain because such recoverable amount is determined based on a number of management estimates and judgments as described in “—Impairment of Goodwill.” Changes in management judgments may result in different impairment test results and different impairment amounts recognized. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, impairment losses on other intangible assets were ¥448 million and ¥28,689 million, respectively.

Provision for Interest Repayment

Provision for interest repayment represents management’s estimate of future claims for the refund of gray zone interest, taking into account historical experience such as the number of customer claims for a refund, the amount of repayments and the characteristics of customers, and the length of the period during which claims are expected to be received in the future.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time as the legal environment and market conditions change or new information becomes available. Changes in these estimates and judgments could affect the balance of provision for interest repayment. Provision for interest repayment is recorded in provisions as a liability, and it totaled ¥145,179¥141,201 million and ¥157,333¥143,429 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Retirement Benefits

We have defined benefit plans such as defined benefit pension plans andlump-sum severance indemnity plans. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is calculated based on actuarial valuations that are dependent upon a number of assumptions, including discount rates, mortality rates and future salary (benefit) increases. The discount rates are equivalent to market yields of AA credit-rated corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating those of the related obligations. Future mortality rates are based on the official mortality table generally used for actuarial assumptions in Japan. Other assumptions used for the calculation of the defined benefit obligation are based on historical records. Due to the long-term nature of these plans, such estimates are subject to significant uncertainty. While we believe that these assumptions are appropriate, any change in these assumptions will impact actuarial gains and losses, as well as the present value of the defined benefit obligations and the net retirement benefit expense for each period. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions in the year, and return on plan assets excluding interest income are recognized in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit or loss.

The difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period is recognized as assets and liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position. When this calculation for each plan results in a benefit to us, the recognized asset is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan. An economic benefit is available to us, if it is realizable during the life of the plan or on settlement of the plan obligation. The net total of assets and liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position amounted to net assets of ¥279,567¥480,053 million and ¥192,772¥129,976 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Deferred Tax Assets

We recognize deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences, only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the tax losses carried forward and the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. This assessment requires significant management judgments and assumptions. Future taxable profit is estimated based on, among other relevant factors, forecasted results of operations, which are based on historical financial performance and the business plans that management believes to be prudent and feasible. While we carefully assess the realization of tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences, the actual taxable profit in the future may be less than the forecast. The deferred tax assets amounted to ¥19,436¥28,958 million and ¥81,961¥102,198 million in the consolidated statement of financial position at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, while the net total of deferred tax assets and liabilities amounted to net liabilities of ¥378,305 million and ¥238,240¥370,577 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,net assets of ¥36,015 million at March 31, 2020, respectively.

New and Amended Accounting Standards and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “New and Amended Accounting Standards Adopted by the SMBC Group” and “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” under Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

5.A.    OPERATING RESULTS

For discussion about our operating results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, including certain comparative discussion of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, please refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospectus—5.A. Operating Results” in our annual report on Form 20-F filed on June 26, 2020.

Under the economic and financial circumstances described in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Operating Environment,” we made a profit through our commercial banking and other

financial services businesses. Our total operating income increased by ¥464,452¥461,735 million from ¥3,347,895¥2,703,850 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥3,812,347¥3,165,585 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in net investment income (loss) from financial assets and otherliabilities at fair value through profit or loss and net trading income. Our net profit increased by ¥149,012¥474,093 million from ¥740,586¥230,983 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥889,598¥705,076 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, due to the increase in total operating income described above and a decrease in operating expenses, which waswere partially offset by an increase in operating expenses.income tax expense.

Our total assets increased by ¥1,024,585¥22,866,524 million from ¥191,150,981¥212,158,463 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥192,175,566¥235,024,987 million at March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in cash and deposits with banks and investment securities, which were partially offset by a decrease in loans and advances.securities.

Our total liabilities increased by ¥416,069¥21,525,252 million from ¥179,263,698¥201,223,585 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥179,679,767¥222,748,837 million at March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to an increase in repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent, which was partially offset by a decrease in deposits.

Our total equity increased by ¥608,516¥1,341,272 million from ¥11,887,283¥10,934,878 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥12,495,799¥12,276,150 million at March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in retained earnings and other reserves which were partially offset by a decrease innon-controlling interests.and retained earnings.

Operating Results

The following table presents information as to our income, expenses and net profit for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018  2017   2016 
   (In millions, except per share data) 

Interest income

  ¥2,144,070  ¥1,900,261   ¥1,872,584 

Interest expense

   733,969   502,338    431,101 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

   1,410,101   1,397,923    1,441,483 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fee and commission income

   1,131,364   1,066,412    1,031,680 

Fee and commission expense

   178,867   181,573    131,381 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net fee and commission income

   952,497   884,839    900,299 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net trading income

   270,464   183,963    462,682 

Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   (667  2,018    12,260 

Net investment income

   424,097   305,327    375,229 

Other income

   755,855   573,825    496,273 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating income

   3,812,347   3,347,895    3,688,226 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment charges on financial assets

   136,808   212,967    148,356 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net operating income

   3,675,539   3,134,928    3,539,870 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   1,813,121   1,752,135    1,706,263 

Other expenses

   792,765   531,759    538,963 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses

   2,605,886   2,283,894    2,245,226 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures

   49,323   29,318    31,056 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Profit before tax

   1,118,976   880,352    1,325,700 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense

   229,378   139,766    372,878 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net profit

  ¥889,598  ¥740,586   ¥952,822 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Profit attributable to:

     

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

  ¥759,998  ¥627,870   ¥843,920 

Non-controlling interests

   119,878   104,787    106,129 

Other equity instruments holders

   9,722   7,929    2,773 

Earnings per share:

     

Basic

  ¥538.84  ¥458.56   ¥617.25 

Diluted

   538.43   458.18    616.83 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021   2020 
   

(In millions, except per

share data)

 

Interest income

  ¥1,780,370   ¥2,407,045 

Interest expense

   397,245    1,090,730 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

   1,383,125    1,316,315 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fee and commission income

   1,174,382    1,147,132 

Fee and commission expense

   201,723    203,822 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net fee and commission income

   972,659    943,310 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net trading income

   237,746    134,069 

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

   280,012    (21,939

Net investment income

   153,820    176,464 

Other income

   138,223    155,631 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating income

   3,165,585    2,703,850 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment charges on financial assets

   282,486    259,938 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net operating income

   2,883,099    2,443,912 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   1,679,115    1,696,386 

Other expenses

   283,879    488,806 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses

   1,962,994    2,185,192 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Share of post-tax profit of associates and joint ventures

   36,373    24,031 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Profit before tax

   956,478    282,751 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense

   251,402    51,768 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net profit

  ¥705,076   ¥230,983 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Profit attributable to:

    

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

  ¥687,483   ¥200,052 

Non-controlling interests

   4,471    18,567 

Other equity instruments holders

   13,122    12,364 

Earnings per share:

    

Basic

  ¥501.73   ¥145.48 

Diluted

   501.49    145.39 

Total operating income increased by ¥464,452¥461,735 million, or 14%17%, from ¥3,347,895¥2,703,850 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥3,812,347¥3,165,585 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in net investmentincome (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss of ¥301,951 million and net trading income of ¥118,770 million and other income of ¥182,030¥103,677 million. In addition, due to a decrease inAlthough impairment charges on financial assets increased, net operating income also increased by ¥540,611¥439,187 million from ¥3,134,928¥2,443,912 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥3,675,539¥2,883,099 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021.

Net profit increased by ¥149,012¥474,093 million from ¥740,586¥230,983 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥889,598¥705,076 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, as a result of the increase in net operating income described above and a decrease in other expenses, which was partially offset by an increase in other expenses.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Total operating income decreased by ¥340,331 million, or 9%, from ¥3,688,226 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥3,347,895 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in net trading income of ¥278,719 million. In addition, due to an increase in impairment charges on financial assets, net operating income also decreased by ¥404,942 million from ¥3,539,870 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥3,134,928 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Net profit decreased by ¥212,236 million from ¥952,822 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥740,586 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, as a result of the decrease in net operating income described above, which was partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense.

Net Interest Income

The following tables show the average balances of our statement of financial position items, related interest income, interest expense, net interest income and average rates for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

 

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
  Average
balance(3)
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Interest-earning assets:

               

Interest-earning deposits with other banks:

               

Domestic offices

 ¥848,242  ¥4,536  0.53 ¥762,460  ¥4,099  0.54 ¥768,976  ¥4,771  0.62 ¥881,007  ¥2,260  0.26 ¥1,061,849  ¥3,099  0.29

Foreign offices

 4,873,905  73,681  1.51 4,617,409  41,671  0.90 5,786,836  35,701  0.62 4,701,633  15,151  0.32 3,994,229  78,493  1.97
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 5,722,147  78,217  1.37 5,379,869  45,770  0.85 6,555,812  40,472  0.62 5,582,640  17,411  0.31 5,056,078  81,592  1.61
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Call loans and bills bought:

         

Call loans and bills bought, reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

      

Domestic offices

 81,336  412  0.51 76,227  467  0.61 147,992  861  0.58 9,256,043  (687 (0.01%)  9,167,833  17,540  0.19

Foreign offices

 1,730,409  18,950  1.10 1,303,429  11,598  0.89 967,442  20,967  2.17 3,224,164  25,926  0.80 3,032,754  51,881  1.71
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 1,811,745  19,362  1.07 1,379,656  12,065  0.87 1,115,434  21,828  1.96 12,480,207  25,239  0.20 12,200,587  69,421  0.57
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

         

Domestic offices

 8,120,363  14,563  0.18 7,443,668  12,151  0.16 6,675,810  10,763  0.16

Foreign offices

 1,222,180  25,458  2.08 1,009,997  17,450  1.73 741,623  11,248  1.52
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 9,342,543  40,021  0.43 8,453,665  29,601  0.35 7,417,433  22,011  0.30
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Held-to-maturity investments(1):

         

Domestic offices

 784,339  3,244  0.41 1,809,777  6,756  0.37 2,964,539  12,880  0.43
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 784,339  3,244  0.41 1,809,777  6,756  0.37 2,964,539  12,880  0.43
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Available-for-sale financial assets(1):

         

Investment securities(1):

      

Domestic offices

 9,799,861  44,053  0.45 7,477,480  41,561  0.56 10,878,176  38,701  0.36 16,642,148  46,384  0.28 11,245,654  75,026  0.67

Foreign offices

 3,406,370  54,998  1.61 2,945,084  39,031  1.33 2,425,249  33,331  1.37 5,385,436  80,255  1.49 4,832,026  103,804  2.15
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 13,206,231  99,051  0.75 10,422,564  80,592  0.77 13,303,425  72,032  0.54 22,027,584  126,639  0.57 16,077,680  178,830  1.11
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Loans and advances(2):

               

Domestic offices

 68,551,116  1,093,584  1.60 66,948,344  1,082,058  1.62 63,177,259  1,091,538  1.73 64,651,076  846,911  1.31 60,498,334  937,419  1.55

Foreign offices

 28,121,904  810,591  2.88 25,298,515  643,419  2.54 26,272,983  611,823  2.33 32,230,777  764,170  2.37 31,467,410  1,139,783  3.62
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 96,673,020  1,904,175  1.97 92,246,859  1,725,477  1.87 89,450,242  1,703,361  1.90 96,881,853  1,611,081  1.66 91,965,744  2,077,202  2.26
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-earning assets:

               

Domestic offices

 88,185,257  1,160,392  1.32 84,517,956  1,147,092  1.36 84,612,752  1,159,514  1.37 91,430,274  894,868  0.98 81,973,670  1,033,084  1.26

Foreign offices

 39,354,768  983,678  2.50 35,174,434  753,169  2.14 36,194,133  713,070  1.97 45,542,010  885,502  1.94 43,326,419  1,373,961  3.17
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 ¥127,540,025  ¥2,144,070  1.68 ¥119,692,390  ¥1,900,261  1.59 ¥120,806,885  ¥1,872,584  1.55 ¥136,972,284  ¥1,780,370  1.30 ¥125,300,089  ¥2,407,045  1.92
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
  Average
balance(3)
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance(3)
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

               

Deposits:

               

Domestic offices

 ¥87,138,742  ¥44,941  0.05 ¥82,738,015  ¥35,881  0.04 ¥78,458,170  ¥48,032  0.06 ¥91,029,016  ¥16,601  0.02 ¥85,668,767  ¥51,976  0.06

Foreign offices

 25,413,734  337,812  1.33 23,383,002  213,147  0.91 22,838,530  154,280  0.68 28,285,386  163,309  0.58 27,197,901  530,823  1.95
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 112,552,476  382,753  0.34 106,121,017  249,028  0.23 101,296,700  202,312  0.20 119,314,402  179,910  0.15 112,866,668  582,799  0.52
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Call money and bills sold:

         

Domestic offices

 845,376  302  0.04 603,065  92  0.02 2,199,407  1,524  0.07

Foreign offices

 801,565  8,461  1.06 618,949  5,194  0.84 663,310  4,059  0.61
 

 

�� 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 1,646,941  8,763  0.53 1,222,014  5,286  0.43 2,862,717  5,583  0.20
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

         

Call money and bills sold, repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent and other interest- bearing liabilities:

      

Domestic offices

 10,015,944  16,774  0.17 7,149,638  5,616  0.08 7,172,312  8,582  0.12 11,074,484  (5,172 (0.05%)  11,218,806  33,745  0.30

Foreign offices

 4,205,510  44,567  1.06 3,081,806  15,007  0.49 2,009,593  6,523  0.32 4,524,797  14,865  0.33 5,063,872  112,479  2.22
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 14,221,454  61,341  0.43 10,231,444  20,623  0.20 9,181,905  15,105  0.16 15,599,281  9,693  0.06 16,282,678  146,224  0.90
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Borrowings:

               

Domestic office

 11,331,752  61,460  0.54 8,113,368  58,772  0.72 10,251,890  56,353  0.55 17,075,586  40,483  0.24 11,958,700  61,238  0.51

Foreign offices

 983,616  27,736  2.82 847,353  21,063  2.49 823,446  15,850  1.92 599,476  22,141  3.69 600,321  31,187  5.20
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 12,315,368  89,196  0.72 8,960,721  79,835  0.89 11,075,336  72,203  0.65 17,675,062  62,624  0.35 12,559,021  92,425  0.74
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Debt securities in issue:

               

Domestic offices

 9,298,368  166,769  1.79 8,320,124  130,613  1.57 7,999,705  120,285  1.50 9,764,667  100,987  1.03 9,419,223  197,749  2.10

Foreign offices

 2,180,438  24,005  1.10 2,193,406  16,324  0.74 3,044,714  14,887  0.49 1,678,663  8,218  0.49 1,883,920  34,724  1.84
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 11,478,806  190,774  1.66 10,513,530  146,937  1.40 11,044,419  135,172  1.22 11,443,330  109,205  0.95 11,303,143  232,473  2.06
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Other interest-bearing liabilities:

         

Premiums for deposit insurance:

      

Domestic offices

 102,683  524  0.51 95,660  579  0.61 93,104  676  0.73  —    34,192   —     —    34,866   —   

Foreign offices

 23,466  618  2.63 3,531  50  1.42 1,960  50  2.55  —    1,621   —     —    1,943   —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 126,149  1,142  0.91 99,191  629  0.63 95,064  726  0.76  —    35,813   —     —    36,809   —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities:

               

Domestic offices

 118,732,865  290,770  0.24 107,019,870  231,553  0.22 106,174,588  235,452  0.22 128,943,753  187,091  0.15 118,265,496  379,574  0.32

Foreign offices

 33,608,329  443,199  1.32 30,128,047  270,785  0.90 29,381,553  195,649  0.67 35,088,322  210,154  0.60 34,746,014  711,156  2.05
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 ¥152,341,194  ¥733,969  0.48 ¥137,147,917  ¥502,338  0.37 ¥135,556,141  ¥431,101  0.32 ¥164,032,075  ¥397,245  0.24 ¥153,011,510  ¥1,090,730  0.71
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Net interest income and interest rate spread

  ¥1,410,101  1.20  ¥1,397,923  1.22  ¥1,441,483  1.23  ¥1,383,125  1.06  ¥1,316,315  1.21
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Taxable investment securities andnon-taxable investment securities are not disclosed separately because the aggregate effect of these average balances and interest income would not be material. In addition, the yields ontax-exempt obligations have not been calculated on a tax equivalent basis because the effect of such calculation would not be material.

(2)

Loans and advances include impaired loans and advances. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans and advances.

(3)

Average balances are generally based on a daily average. Weekly,month-end orquarter-end averages are used for certain average balances where it is not practical to obtain applicable daily averages. The allocations of amounts between domestic and foreign are based on the location of the office.

The following tables show changes in our interest income, interest expense and net interest income based on changes in volume and changes in rate for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and those for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2020.

 

  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
Increase / (decrease)
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
Increase / (decrease)
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2021
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
Increase / (decrease)
 
  Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change   Volume Rate Net change 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest income:

           

Interest-earning deposits with other banks:

           

Domestic offices

  ¥456  ¥(19 ¥437  ¥(40 ¥(632 ¥(672  ¥(491 ¥(348 ¥(839

Foreign offices

   2,427  29,583  32,010  (8,263 14,233  5,970    11,899  (75,241 (63,342
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   2,883  29,564  32,447  (8,303 13,601  5,298    11,408  (75,589 (64,181
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Call loans and bills bought:

       

Call loans and bills bought, reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

    

Domestic offices

   30  (85 (55 (436 42  (394   166  (18,393 (18,227

Foreign offices

   4,321  3,031  7,352  5,697  (15,066 (9,369   3,088  (29,043 (25,955
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   4,351  2,946  7,297  5,261  (15,024 (9,763   3,254  (47,436 (44,182
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

       

Domestic offices

   1,140  1,272  2,412  1,229  159  1,388 

Foreign offices

   4,049  3,959  8,008  4,487  1,715  6,202 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   5,189  5,231  10,420  5,716  1,874  7,590 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity investments:

       

Domestic offices

   (4,139 627  (3,512 (4,455 (1,669 (6,124
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   (4,139 627  (3,512 (4,455 (1,669 (6,124
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

       

Investment securities:

    

Domestic offices

   11,440  (8,948 2,492  (14,692 17,552  2,860    26,646  (55,288 (28,642

Foreign offices

   6,686  9,281  15,967  6,939  (1,239 5,700    10,906  (34,455 (23,549
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   18,126  333  18,459  (7,753 16,313  8,560    37,552  (89,743 (52,191
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans and advances:

           

Domestic offices

   25,753  (14,227 11,526  63,231  (72,711 (9,480   61,306  (151,814 (90,508

Foreign offices

   76,079  91,093  167,172  (23,302 54,898  31,596    27,008  (402,621 (375,613
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   101,832  76,866  178,698  39,929  (17,813 22,116    88,314  (554,435 (466,121
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest income:

           

Domestic offices

   34,680  (21,380 13,300  44,837  (57,259 (12,422   87,627  (225,843 (138,216

Foreign offices

   93,562  136,947  230,509  (14,442 54,541  40,099    52,901  (541,360 (488,459
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  ¥128,242  ¥115,567  ¥243,809  ¥30,395  ¥(2,718 ¥27,677   ¥140,528  ¥(767,203 ¥(626,675
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
Increase / (decrease)
  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
Increase / (decrease)
 
   Volume  Rate  Net change  Volume  Rate  Net change 
   (In millions) 

Interest expense:

       

Deposits:

       

Domestic offices

  ¥1,837  ¥7,223  ¥9,060  ¥2,448  ¥(14,599 ¥(12,151

Foreign offices

   19,830   104,835   124,665   3,785   55,082   58,867 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   21,667   112,058   133,725   6,233   40,483   46,716 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Call money and bills sold:

       

Domestic offices

   62   148   210   (715  (717  (1,432

Foreign offices

   1,747   1,520   3,267   (286  1,421   1,135 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   1,809   1,668   3,477   (1,001  704   (297
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

       

Domestic offices

   2,971   8,187   11,158   (27  (2,939  (2,966

Foreign offices

   7,035   22,525   29,560   4,344   4,140   8,484 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   10,006   30,712   40,718   4,317   1,201   5,518 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Borrowings:

       

Domestic offices

   19,619   (16,931  2,688   (13,227  15,646   2,419 

Foreign offices

   3,639   3,034   6,673   471   4,742   5,213 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   23,258   (13,897  9,361   (12,756)   20,388   7,632 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Debt securities in issue:

       

Domestic offices

   16,340   19,816   36,156   4,910   5,418   10,328 

Foreign offices

   (97  7,778   7,681   (4,925  6,362   1,437 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   16,243   27,594   43,837   (15  11,780   11,765 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing liabilities:

       

Domestic offices

   41   (96  (55  18   (115  (97

Foreign offices

   493   75   568   29   (29  0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   534   (21  513   47   (144  (97
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense:

       

Domestic offices

   40,870   18,347   59,217   (6,593  2,694   (3,899

Foreign offices

   32,647   139,767   172,414   3,418   71,718   75,136 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥73,517  ¥158,114  ¥231,631  ¥(3,175 ¥74,412  ¥71,237 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income:

       

Domestic offices

  ¥(6,190 ¥(39,727 ¥(45,917 ¥51,430  ¥(59,953 ¥(8,523

Foreign offices

   60,915   (2,820  58,095   (17,860  (17,177  (35,037
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥54,725  ¥(42,547 ¥12,178  ¥33,570  ¥(77,130 ¥(43,560
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2021
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
Increase / (decrease)
 
   Volume  Rate  Net change 
   (In millions) 

Interest expense:

    

Deposits:

    

Domestic offices

  ¥3,032  ¥(38,407 ¥(35,375

Foreign offices

   20,404   (387,918  (367,514
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   23,436   (426,325  (402,889
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Call money and bills sold, repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent and other interest-bearing liabilities:

    

Domestic offices

   (427  (38,490  (38,917

Foreign offices

   (10,835  (86,779  (97,614
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (11,262  (125,269  (136,531
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Borrowings:

    

Domestic offices

   19,921   (40,676  (20,755

Foreign offices

   (44  (9,002  (9,046
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   19,877   (49,678  (29,801
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Debt securities in issue:

    

Domestic offices

   7,006   (103,768  (96,762

Foreign offices

   (3,418  (23,088  (26,506
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   3,588   (126,856  (123,268
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Premiums for deposit insurance:

    

Domestic offices

   (674  —     (674

Foreign offices

   (322  —     (322
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (996  —     (996
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense:

    

Domestic offices

   28,858   (221,341  (192,483

Foreign offices

   5,785   (506,787  (501,002
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥34,643  ¥(728,128 ¥(693,485
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income:

    

Domestic offices

  ¥58,769  ¥(4,502 ¥54,267 

Foreign offices

   47,116   (34,573  12,543 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥105,885  ¥(39,075 ¥66,810 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest Income

Our interest income increaseddecreased by ¥243,809¥626,675 million, or 13%,26% from ¥1,900,261¥2,407,045 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥2,144,070¥1,780,370 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021. This decrease was primarily due to an increasea decrease in interest income on loans and advances.advances of ¥466,121 million, or 22%. Interest income on loans and advances increaseddecreased by ¥90,508 million, or 10% at domestic offices and by ¥375,613 million, or 33% at foreign offices. The decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the average rate of loans, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of loans to corporate customers as a result of our responses to their financing needs arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

¥178,698Interest Expense

Our interest expense decreased by ¥693,485 million, or 10%64%, from ¥1,725,477¥1,090,730 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥1,904,175¥397,245 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to performancea decrease in our foreign offices. Interest incomeinterest expenses on loans and advances at foreign offices increaseddeposits. Our interest expense on deposits decreased by ¥167,172¥402,889 million, or 26%69%, from ¥643,419¥582,799 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥810,591¥179,910 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in both the average rate and volume of loans toa decrease at foreign customers. Interest income on loans and advances at domestic offices slightly increased by ¥11,526 million, or 1%, from ¥1,082,058 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥1,093,584 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, due to an increase in volume which was partially offset byreflecting a decrease in the average rate reflecting the continuing intense competition in the commercial banking industry.

Interest Expense

Our interest expense increased by ¥231,631 million, or 46%, from ¥502,338 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥733,969 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to increases in interest expense on deposits and debt securities in issue. Our interest expense on deposits increased by ¥133,725 million, or 54%, from ¥249,028 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥382,753 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase at foreign offices reflecting an increase in the average rate. Interest expense on debt securities in issue increased by ¥43,837 million, or 30%, from ¥146,937 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥190,774 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to increases in both the average rate and volume.

Net Interest Income

Our net interest income increased by ¥12,178¥66,810 million, or 1%5%, from ¥1,397,923¥1,316,315 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥1,410,101¥1,383,125 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The net interest income increased2021. This was primarily due to an increaseincreases in interest income onthe volume of interest-earning assets, primarily loans, while both the average rate of interest-earning assets, primarily loans, and advances, which was partiallyinterest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits, decreased but offset by increaseseach other, resulting in less impact for the fluctuation of the net interest expense on deposits and debt securities in issue.income.

From the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to March 31, 2018,2021, the average rate on loans and advances at domestic offices decreased by 0.020.24 percentage points from 1.62%1.55% to 1.60%, primarily due to the continuing intense competition in the commercial banking industry.1.31%. The average rate on loans and advances at foreign offices increaseddecreased by 0.341.25 percentage points from 2.54%3.62% to 2.88%. As a result,2.37%, resulting in the total for loans and advances increaseddecreasing by 0.100.60 percentage points from 1.87%2.26% to 1.97%1.66%. On the other hand, the average rate on deposits increaseddecreased by 0.110.37 percentage points from 0.23%0.52% to 0.34%0.15%, primarily due to an increasea decrease in the average rate on deposits at foreign offices by 0.421.37 percentage points from 0.91%1.95% to 1.33%.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Interest Income

Our interest income increased by ¥27,677 million, or 1%, from ¥1,872,584 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,900,261 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase in interest income on loans and advances. Interest income on loans and advances increased by ¥22,116 million, or 1%, from ¥1,703,361 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,725,477 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to performance in our foreign offices. Interest income on loans and advances at foreign offices increased by ¥31,596 million, or 5%, from ¥611,823 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥643,419 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, due to an increase in the average rate of loans to foreign customers, which was partially offset by a decrease in volume reflecting the appreciations of the yen against other currencies compared to the previous fiscal year. Interest income on loans and advances at domestic offices decreased by ¥9,480 million, or 1%, from ¥1,091,538 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,082,058 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, due to a decrease in the average rate reflecting a decrease in market interest rates and continuing intense competition in the commercial banking industry, which was substantially offset by an increase in volume.

Interest Expense

Our interest expense increased by ¥71,237 million, or 17%, from ¥431,101 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥502,338 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to increases in interest expense on deposits and debt securities in issue. Our interest expense on deposits increased by ¥46,716 million, or 23%, from ¥202,312 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥249,028 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase at foreign offices reflecting an increase in the average rate, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate at domestic offices. Interest expense on debt securities in issue increased by ¥11,765 million, or 9%, from ¥135,172 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥146,937 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase in average rate.

Net Interest Income

Our net interest income decreased by ¥43,560 million, or 3%, from ¥1,441,483 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,397,923 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The net interest income decreased primarily due to increases in interest expense on deposits and debt securities in issue, which were partially offset by an increase in interest income on loans and advances.

From the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017, the average rate on loans and advances at domestic offices decreased by 0.11 percentage points from 1.73% to 1.62%, primarily due to a decrease in market interest rates and the continuing intense competition in the commercial banking industry. The average rate on loans and advances at foreign offices increased by 0.21 percentage points from 2.33% to 2.54%. As a result, the total for loans and advances slightly decreased by 0.03 percentage points from 1.90% to 1.87%. On the other hand, the average rate on deposits at domestic offices slightly decreased by 0.02 percentage points from 0.06% to 0.04%, and the average rate on deposits at foreign offices increased by 0.23 percentage points from 0.68% to 0.91%, resulting in the total for deposits increasing by 0.03 percentage points from 0.20% to 0.23%0.58%.

Net Fee and Commission Income

The following table sets forth our net fee and commission income for the periods shown.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018  2017  2016 
          
  (In millions) 

Fee and commission income from:

   

Loans

 ¥120,998  ¥128,305  ¥121,934 

Credit card business

  289,509   261,253   253,136 

Guarantees

  62,934   58,221   55,618 

Securities-related business

  147,016   146,655   133,019 

Deposits

  16,169   15,929   14,882 

Remittances and transfers

  140,621   138,029   133,110 

Safe deposits

  5,224   5,414   5,511 

Trust fees

  3,854   3,607   3,619 

Investment trusts

  154,419   126,590   116,057 

Agency

  16,577   16,753   16,432 

Others

  174,043   165,656   178,362 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fee and commission income

  1,131,364   1,066,412   1,031,680 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fee and commission expense from:

   

Remittances and transfers

  40,214   39,419   38,358 

Guarantees

  3,750   3,434   3,071 

Others

  134,903   138,720   89,952 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fee and commission expense

  178,867   181,573   131,381 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net fee and commission income

 ¥952,497  ¥884,839  ¥900,299 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
  (In millions) 

Fee and commission income from:

  

Loans

 ¥132,523  ¥123,472 

Credit card business

  304,787   304,238 

Guarantees

  64,422   67,846 

Securities-related business

  169,251   149,837 

Deposits

  14,763   14,045 

Remittances and transfers

  138,907   141,617 

Safe deposits

  4,160   4,349 

Trust fees

  4,885   4,680 

Investment trusts

  163,522   150,349 

Agency

  8,442    9,612  

Others

  168,720   177,087 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fee and commission income

  1,174,382   1,147,132 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fee and commission expense from:

  

Remittances and transfers

  39,417   40,601 

Others

  162,306   163,221 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total fee and commission expense

  201,723   203,822 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net fee and commission income

 ¥972,659  ¥943,310 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fee and commission income increased by ¥64,952¥27,250 million, or 6%2%, from ¥1,066,412¥1,147,132 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥1,131,364¥1,174,382 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. Primary sources of

fee and commission income are fees obtained through our credit card business, fees obtained through securities-related business, fees and commissions obtained through investment trusts, fees obtained through securities-related business, remittance and transfer fees, and loan transaction fees. The increase in fee and commission income was primarily due to increases in fees obtained through credit card business along with business expansion and fees and commissions obtained through securities-related business and investment trusts reflecting the rise in stock prices and expansionstrong performance of our investment trustthe wealth management business.business under a robust market environment.

Fee and commission expense was ¥178,867¥201,723 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, decreased by ¥2,706¥2,099 million or 1%, from ¥181,573¥203,822 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2020.

As a result, net fee and commission income increased by ¥67,658¥29,349 million, or 8%3%, from ¥884,839¥943,310 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥952,497¥972,659 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Fee and commission income increased by ¥34,732 million, or 3%, from ¥1,031,680 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,066,412 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. Primary sources of fee and commission income are fees obtained through our credit card business, fees obtained through securities-related business, remittance and transfer fees, loan transaction fees, and fees and commissions obtained through investment trusts. The increase in fee and commission income was primarily due to increases in fees obtained through securities-related business, mainly equity underwriting commissions, and fee and commissions obtained through investment trusts reflecting the inclusion of fees related to investment trusts at SMAM.

Fee and commission expense was ¥181,573 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, increased by ¥50,192 million, or 38%, from ¥131,381 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The inclusion of fee and commission expense of SMAM contributed to the increase in total fee and commission expense.

As a result, net fee and commission income decreased by ¥15,460 million, or 2%, from ¥900,299 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥884,839 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Net Income (Loss) from Trading, Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss and Investment Securities

The following table sets forth our net income (loss) from trading, financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities for the periods shown.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018  2017   2016 
            
   (In millions) 

Net trading income:

     

Interest rate

  ¥128,137  ¥79,650   ¥240,763 

Foreign exchange

   87,322   51,143    204,349 

Equity

   48,047   39,478    18,019 

Credit

   5,735   13,063    (2,641

Others

   1,223   629    2,192 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net trading income

  ¥270,464  ¥183,963   ¥462,682 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

     

Net income (loss) from debt instruments

  ¥(1,775 ¥428   ¥11,311 

Net income from equity instruments

   1,108   1,590    949 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥(667 ¥2,018   ¥12,260 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income:

     

Net gain from disposal of debt instruments

  ¥4,187  ¥39,484   ¥71,641 

Net gain from disposal of equity instruments

   281,036   142,016    175,494 

Dividend income

   138,874   123,827    128,094 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net investment income

  ¥424,097  ¥305,327   ¥375,229 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
  (In millions) 

Net trading income:

  

Interest rate

 ¥38,987  ¥149,420 

Foreign exchange

  168,462   (78,541

Equity

  34,772   59,388 

Credit

  (4,723  2,495 

Others

  248   1,307 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net trading income

 ¥237,746  ¥134,069 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss:

  

Net income (loss) from financial assets mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss:

  

Net income (loss) from debt instruments

 ¥262,396  ¥(23,557

Net income from equity instruments

       23,687          1,618 

Net loss from financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  (6,071  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

 ¥280,012  ¥(21,939
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net investment income:

  

Net gain from disposal of debt instruments

 ¥79,711  ¥96,624 

Dividend income

  74,109   79,840 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net investment income

 ¥153,820  ¥176,464 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net trading income, which includes income and losses from trading assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments, increased by ¥86,501¥103,677 million from ¥183,963¥134,069 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥270,464¥237,746 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net trading income from foreign exchange transactions, which was partially offset by a decrease in net trading income from interest rate related transactions. The increase in net trading income from foreign exchange transactions was primarily due to an increase in net gains from changes in the fair value of currency swaps and foreign exchange transactions related to the “economic hedges.”forward contracts.

We have carried out hedging transactions mainly to hedge both the interest rate risk of financial assets and liabilities and the foreign exchange risk of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Of those hedges, the

economic hedges are economically effective for risk management but are not accounted for as hedge accounting under IFRS.

As for the economic hedges against the interest rate risk, hedged items include loans borrowings and debt securities in issue,deposits and hedging instruments are derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps. TheAs for the economic hedges against the foreign exchange risk, are classified into three types: (1) net investments in foreign operations hedged by usingitems are foreign currency denominated financial liabilities such as deposits and borrowings, and derivative financial instruments, (2) foreign currency denominated equity instruments classified asavailable-for-sale financial assets hedged by using foreign currency denominated financial liabilities, and (3) foreign currency denominated financial assets and liabilities such as loans and deposits hedged by using derivative financialhedging instruments such asare currency swaps.

derivatives. The economic hedge transactions may lead to accounting mismatches (i.e., when the gains or losses on the hedged items and hedging instruments do not arise at the same time, or the hedged items and hedging instruments do not offset each other either in profit or loss, or in other comprehensive income). Accordingly, large fluctuations in interest rates and/or large depreciations or appreciations of the yen against other currencies, and may result in significant fluctuations in net trading income from interest rate related transactions and/or foreign exchange transactions.

The increase in net trading income from interest rate related transactions was primarily due to a decrease in losses from interest rate hedging instruments for the economic hedges, reflecting a smaller increase in U.S. interest rates during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 compared to the previous fiscal year.

As for net trading income from foreign exchange transactions, the fluctuation between the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was smaller than that between the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. We started to apply hedge accounting on April 1, 2017 to part of the hedge transactions whose hedged items were net investments in foreign operations, which had been previously included in the economic hedges. As a result, part of the accounting mismatches from economic hedge transactions were eliminated, and this contributed to reducing the above-mentioned fluctuation.income.

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss decreasedincreased by ¥2,685¥301,951 million from a net incomeloss of ¥2,018¥21,939 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to a net lossincome of ¥667¥280,012 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of debt instruments.

Net investment income increased by ¥118,770 million from ¥305,327 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥424,097 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. This was primarily due to an increase in net gains from changes in the fair value and sales of equity index-linked investment trusts, which was partially offset by a decrease in net gains from sales of bonds.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016trusts.

Net tradinginvestment income which includes income and losses from trading assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments, decreased by ¥278,719¥22,644 million from ¥462,682¥176,464 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162020 to ¥183,963¥153,820 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net trading income from interest rate related transactions and foreign exchange transactions related to the economic hedges as described in the previous section.

The decrease in net trading income from interest rate related transactions reflected a rise in U.S. interest rates. The decrease in net trading income from foreign exchange transactions was primarily due to a decrease in the impact of the appreciation of the yen against the U.S. dollar on gains or losses arising from foreign exchange. The yen exchange rate against the U.S. dollar was ¥112.19, ¥112.62 and ¥120.15 at March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This resulted in the 0.43-yen appreciation of the yen against the U.S. dollar during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, which was smaller than the 7.53-yen appreciation during the previous fiscal year. For further information about the yen exchange rates, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.A. Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates.”

Net income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss decreased by ¥10,242 million from ¥12,260 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥2,018 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in gains arising from sales and changes in the fair value of debt instruments.

Net investment income decreased by ¥69,902 million from ¥375,229 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥305,327 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2021. This was primarily due to a decrease in net gains from sales of equity index-linked investment trusts and bonds.

Other Income

The following table sets forth our other income for the periods shown.

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (In millions) 

Income from operating leases

  ¥276,850   ¥250,460   ¥206,561 

Income related to disposal of assets leased

   322,673    152,564    155,280 

Income related to IT solution services

   29,172    37,678    33,991 

Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets

   852    937    3,714 

Reversal of impairment losses of investments in associates and joint ventures

   8,123    —      4,847 

Gains on step acquisition of subsidiaries

   —      20,344 ��  118 

Gains on step acquisition of associates and joint ventures

   —      —      1,714 

Others

   118,185    111,842    90,048 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income

  ¥755,855   ¥573,825   ¥496,273 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Other income increased by ¥182,030 million, or 32%, from ¥573,825 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥755,855 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to increases in income related to the disposal of assets leased and income from operating leases.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Other income increased by ¥77,552 million, or 16%, from ¥496,273 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥573,825 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increases in income from operating leases reflecting the inclusion of GE group’s leasing business in Japan, which we acquired on April 1, 2016, and gains on step acquisition of subsidiaries related to the acquisition of SMAM.

Impairment Charges on Financial Assets

The following table sets forth our impairment charges (reversals) on financial assets for the periods shown.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
       (In millions)     

Loans and advances

  ¥126,623   ¥141,457   ¥118,750 

Available-for-sale financial assets

   10,185    71,510    29,606 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impairment charges on financial assets

  ¥136,808   ¥212,967   ¥148,356 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2021  2020 
  (In millions) 

Loans and advances

 ¥277,085  ¥249,478 

Loan commitments

       12,729        11,011 

Financial guarantees

  (7,328  (551
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total impairment charges on financial assets

 ¥282,486  ¥259,938 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our impairment charges on financial assets consist of losses relating to loans and advances, loan commitments andavailable-for-sale financial assets.guarantee contracts. Impairment charges on loans and advancesthese financial assets are mainly affected by the economic environment and financial conditions of borrowers. On the other hand, impairment charges onavailable-for-sale financial assets are mainly affected by not only the economic environment and financial conditions of issuers but the fair value of the financial instruments, such as market prices on stock markets in the case of equity instruments.

Impairment charges on loans and advances decreasedfinancial assets increased by ¥14,834¥22,548 million from ¥141,457¥259,938 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥126,623¥282,486 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021, primarily due to an increase in impairment charges on loans and advances. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a decreasean increase in the provision for loan losses reflecting gradual recovery ofrelated to our corporate customers affected by the Japanese and global economy.

COVID-19 pandemic. For detailed information on provision for loan losses, see “—Financial Condition—Allowance for Loan Losses.

Impairment charges onavailable-for-sale financial assets decreased by ¥61,325 million from ¥71,510 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥10,185 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease in impairment charges on investment trusts, mainly those investing in Japanese or foreign stocks.

In determining the amount of impairment charges at the end of each reporting period, we consider whether there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of loss events, such as any significant financial difficulty of the issuer. Our assessments of issuers are focused by industry and geographical area, taking into consideration the adverse impact of any specific issues such as significant changes in the technological, market, economic or legal environment of the issuer indicating that the cost of our investment may not be recovered. Additionally, in the case ofavailable-for-sale equity instruments, we take into consideration whether there has been a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the equity instruments below their cost.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, the types of securities on which the impairment charges were recognized included investments in limited partnerships and investment trusts.

For detailed information on ouravailable-for-sale financial assets, which include a diversified portfolio of domestic equity instruments, see “—Financial Condition—Investment Securities.”

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Impairment charges on loans and advances increased by ¥22,707 million from ¥118,750 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥141,457 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase in impairment charges on loans and advances to our domestic customers.

For detailed information on provision for loan losses, see “—Financial Condition—Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Impairment charges onavailable-for-sale financial assets increased by ¥41,904 million from ¥29,606 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥71,510 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase in impairment charges on investment trusts, mainly those investing in Japanese or foreign stocks. Most of these impairment charges reflected the decline in the Nikkei Stock Average and the appreciation of the yen against the U.S. dollar for the first half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

For detailed information on ouravailable-for-sale financial assets, which include a diversified portfolio of domestic equity instruments, see “—Financial Condition—Investment Securities.

General and Administrative Expenses

The following table sets forth our general and administrative expenses for the periods shown.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
       (In millions)     

Personnel expenses

  ¥864,396   ¥833,755   ¥785,547 

Depreciation and amortization

   171,043    172,496    157,672 

Rent and lease expenses

   117,400    115,425    117,482 

Building and maintenance expenses

   11,167    10,657    13,966 

Supplies expenses

   16,902    16,694    16,628 

Communication expenses

   38,171    37,250    36,634 

Publicity and advertising expenses

   80,464    79,570    79,453 

Taxes and dues

   83,976    85,967    76,695 

Outsourcing expenses

   96,733    96,063    91,837 

Premiums for deposit insurance

   37,938    38,180    36,175 

Office equipment expenses

   54,708    49,127    47,621 

Others

   240,223    216,951    246,553 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

  ¥1,813,121   ¥1,752,135   ¥1,706,263 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2021  2020 
  (In millions) 

Personnel expenses

 ¥770,769  ¥787,880 

Depreciation and amortization

  255,702   258,516 

Building and maintenance expenses

  8,593    8,864  

Supplies expenses

  15,191   15,506 

Communication expenses

  33,454   34,213 

Publicity and advertising expenses

  89,924   73,483 

Taxes and dues

  83,554   84,364 

Outsourcing expenses

  111,737   109,100 

Office equipment expenses

  56,389   51,283 

Others

  253,802   273,177 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

 ¥1,679,115  ¥1,696,386 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses increaseddecreased by ¥60,986¥17,271 million, or 3%1%, from ¥1,752,135¥1,696,386 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥1,813,121¥1,679,115 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. This was primarily due to increases in general and administrative expenses of SMBC Nikko Securities and Sumitomo Mitsui Card related to their business development, which were partially offset by SMBC Group-wide expense control initiatives.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥45,872 million, or 3%, from ¥1,706,263 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,752,135 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to the full inclusion of general and administrative expenses of SMBC Trust Bank, which acquired the retail banking business of Citibank Japan Ltd. in November 2015, and the inclusion of GE group’s leasing business in Japan, which we acquired on April 1, 2016.

Other Expenses

The following table sets forth our other expenses for the periods shown.

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
       (In millions)     

Cost of operating leases

  ¥144,708   ¥126,320   ¥95,440 

Cost related to disposal of assets leased

   310,460    140,255    140,083 

Cost related to IT solution services and IT systems

   92,975    92,247    90,563 

Provision for interest repayment

   49,879    11,439    141,024 

Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets

   4,913    6,041    4,302 

Impairment losses of property, plant and equipment

   27,816    6,396    4,237 

Impairment losses of intangible assets

   35,666    74,788    1,278 

Losses on sale of investments in subsidiaries and associates

   28,250    —      24 

Impairment losses of investments in associates and joint ventures

   19,851    14,941    17,306 

Others

   78,247    59,332    44,706 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expenses

  ¥792,765   ¥531,759   ¥538,963 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Other expenses increased by ¥261,006 million, or 49%, from ¥531,759 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥792,765 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to increases in cost related to disposal of assets leased, cost of operating leases and provision for interest repayment.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Other expenses decreased by ¥7,204 million, or 1%, from ¥538,963 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥531,759 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in provision for interest repayment, whichpersonnel expenses because the past service cost was partially offsetrecognized as profit due to a decrease in SMBC’s defined benefit obligation as a result of the amendment to the terms of its defined benefit pension plans. Furthermore, restrictions on operating activities affected by increasesthe COVID-19 pandemic and our cost reduction efforts contributed to a decrease in impairment losses of intangible assetsgeneral and cost of operating leases.administrative expenses.

Share ofPost-tax Profit of Associates and Joint Ventures

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures increased by ¥20,005¥12,342 million from ¥29,318¥24,031 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥49,323¥36,373 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. This was2021, primarily due to an increase in profit of The Bank of East Asia, Limited, reflecting gains on sale of its subsidiary.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures decreased by ¥1,738 million from ¥31,056 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥29,318 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in our share of the profit of foreign associates and joint ventures.ventures engaged in leasing business.

Income Tax Expense

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Income tax expense increased by ¥89,612¥199,634 million from ¥139,766¥51,768 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 to ¥229,378¥251,402 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to a correction to the reversal of the write-down of deferred tax assets in the previous fiscal year in accordance with the adoption of the consolidatedcorporate-tax system in Japan from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. For further information on the consolidated corporatetax-system, see Note 22 “Deferred Income Tax” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Income tax expense decreased by ¥233,112 million from ¥372,878 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥139,766 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, due to a decrease in deferred tax expense. The decrease was2021, primarily due to an increase in deferred tax expense resulting from a decrease of deductible temporary differences attributable to derivative financial instruments and the reversalan increase of the write-down of deferred tax assets at March 31, 2017 in accordance with the applicationtaxable temporary differences attributable to the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency for permission to adopt the consolidatedcorporate-tax system in Japan from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. Under this system, the taxable profits or losses on a consolidated basis are calculated by aggregating those of the parent company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries (a “tax consolidated group”), and any unused tax losses carried forward, except for certain specified consolidated tax losses carried forward, by one company can be used by another company within the tax consolidated group for Japanese national corporation tax purposes. For further information on the consolidated corporatetax-system, see Note 22 “Deferred Income Tax” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.investment securities.

Business Segment Analysis

Our business segment information is prepared based on the internal reporting system utilized by our management to assess the performance of our business segments under Japanese GAAP.

We have four main business segments: the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit, the Global Business Unit, which was renamed from the International Business Unit on April 1, 2020, and the Global Markets Business Unit, with the remaining operations recorded in Head office account and others. We changed our business segment information forEffective from April 1, 2020, an internal reorganization of certain SMBC businesses was made and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 in connection with the introduction ofrevenue management system at SMBC Group-wide business units, which determine strategies for each customer segment across the SMBC Group companies. The business segmentNikko Securities was previously reported as Commercial Banking, Leasing, Securities and Consumer Finance, with the remaining operations recorded in Others. Comparative information has been restated.changed.

Our organizational charts are provided in “Item 4.C. Organizational Structure.” Since figures reported to management are prepared under Japanese GAAP, the segment information does not agree to figures in the consolidated financial statements under IFRS. This difference is addressed in Note 4 “Segment Analysis—Reconciliation of Segmental Results of Operations to Consolidated Income Statement”Statements” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Segmental Results of Operations

The following tables show our results of operations by business segment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 and 2020. The comparative information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 has been restated to reflect the aforementioned internal reorganization and change in the revenue management system and eliminate the impact of factors such as changes in interest rates and exchange rates that may distort the comparison.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

 

  Wholesale
Business
Unit
  Retail
Business
Unit
  International
Business
Unit
  Global Markets
Business
Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
  (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

 ¥772.9  ¥1,311.7  ¥632.0  ¥356.2  ¥(91.7 ¥2,981.1 

General and administrative expenses

  (347.9  (1,027.7  (280.7  (53.9  (106.0  (1,816.2

Others(2)

  53.7   15.6   46.9   17.5   (94.8  38.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

 ¥478.7  ¥299.6  ¥398.2  ¥319.8  ¥(292.5 ¥1,203.8 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated Gross Profit by Business Segment

(For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018)

LOGO

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

  Wholesale
Business
Unit
  Retail
Business
Unit
  International
Business
Unit
  Global Markets
Business
Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
  (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

 ¥776.4  ¥1,313.9  ¥566.1  ¥346.8  ¥(82.5 ¥2,920.7 

General and administrative expenses

  (344.8  (1,041.1  (241.2  (50.2  (135.1  (1,812.4

Others(2)

  45.6   12.1   38.5   8.2   (79.8  24.6 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

 ¥477.2  ¥284.9  ¥363.4  ¥304.8  ¥(297.4 ¥1,132.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:

 Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 International
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total  Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 Global
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total 
 (In billions)  (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

 ¥749.2  ¥1,272.7  ¥588.8  ¥354.1  ¥(60.8 ¥2,904.0  ¥634.9  ¥1,127.4  ¥723.7  ¥460.7  ¥(140.5 ¥2,806.2 

General and administrative expenses

 (325.3 (1,000.6 (236.5 (49.2 (113.2 (1,724.8 (299.9 (910.4 (383.3 (82.9 (70.6 (1,747.1

Others(2)

 48.0  10.0  (23.9 8.8  (79.2 (36.3 53.5  2.2  26.3  35.7  (92.8 24.9 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

 ¥471.9  ¥282.1  ¥328.4  ¥313.7  ¥(253.2 ¥1,142.9  ¥388.5  ¥219.2  ¥366.7  ¥413.5  ¥(303.9 ¥1,084.0 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

 

 Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 Global
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total 
 (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

 ¥620.1  ¥1,176.1  ¥680.8  ¥438.6  ¥(147.0 ¥2,768.6 

General and administrative expenses

 (303.6 (934.5 (370.9 (79.6 (51.0 (1,739.6

Others(2)

 50.5  2.0  52.9  32.5  (81.9 56.0 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

 ¥367.0  ¥243.6  ¥362.8  ¥391.5  ¥(279.9 ¥1,085.0 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Consolidated gross profit = (Interest income – Interest expenses) + Trust fees + (Fee and commission income – Fee and commission expenses) + (Trading income – Trading losses) + (Other operating income – Other operating expenses).

(2)

“Others” includes share of profit or loss of equity-method associates and joint ventures and cooperated profit and loss, that is, profit and loss double-accounted fordouble counted within our business segments in the managerial accounting.

Wholesale Business Unit

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Consolidated gross profit decreased by ¥3 billion from ¥776 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥635 billion and increased by ¥15 billion compared to ¥773 billionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. This was primarily due to an increase in interest income on loans of SMBC in response to the urgent financial needs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021 was ¥300 billion and decreased by ¥4 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

Others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 was ¥54 billion.

As a result, consolidated net business profit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 was ¥389 billion and increased by ¥22 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

Retail Business Unit

Consolidated gross profit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 was ¥1,127 billion and decreased by ¥49 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. This was primarily due to a decrease in consolidated gross profit related to securities business,income from the payment businesses and the consumer finance businesses reflecting a decline in private consumption affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which was partially offset by an increase in consolidated gross profit related to leasing business.income from the wealth management businesses.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥3 billion from ¥345 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥910 billion and decreased by ¥24 billion compared to ¥348 billionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. This was primarily due to decreases in revenue-linked variable costs of Sumitomo Mitsui Card and SMBC Finance Service, and cost reduction efforts including the branch reorganization of SMBC.

Others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Others increased by ¥8 billion from ¥46 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥54 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021 was ¥2 billion.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥2 billion from ¥477 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥219 billion and decreased by ¥24 billion compared to ¥479 billionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

Global Business Unit

Consolidated gross profit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Fiscal Year Ended2021 was ¥724 billion and increased by ¥43 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 Compared2020. This was primarily due to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016increases in income from lending businesses and securities businesses in response to strong financial needs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Consolidated gross profit increased by ¥27 billion from ¥749 billionGeneral and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162021 was ¥383 billion and increased by ¥12 billion compared to ¥776 billionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. This was due to increases in expenses related to overseas business development as well as enhancement of the governance system.

Others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This2021 was primarily due¥26 billion and decreased by ¥27 billion compared to an increase in consolidated gross profit related to leasing business as a result of the inclusion of SMFL Capital Company, Limited, which became a subsidiary of SMFL in April 2016.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥20 billion from ¥325 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162020. This was primarily due to ¥345 billion fora decrease in our share of post-tax profit of associates and joint ventures, reflecting the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Others decreaseddeterioration of global economic conditions caused by ¥2 billion from ¥48 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥46 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.COVID-19 pandemic.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥5 billion from ¥472 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162021 was ¥367 billion and increased by ¥4 billion compared to ¥477 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Retail Business Unit

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Consolidated gross profit decreased by ¥2 billion from ¥1,314 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥1,312 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. Income on loans of SMBC decreased, although consolidated gross profit related to wealth management business and credit card business increased.

General and administrative expenses decreased by ¥13 billion from ¥1,041 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥1,028 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Others increased by ¥4 billion from ¥12 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥16 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥15 billion from ¥285 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥300 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Consolidated gross profit increased by ¥41 billion from ¥1,273 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,314 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This was primarily due to an increase in gross profit of SMBC Nikko Securities, Sumitomo Mitsui Card and SMBC Consumer Finance.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥40 billion from ¥1,001 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥1,041 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Others increased by ¥2 billion from ¥10 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥12 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥3 billion from ¥282 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥285 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

International Business Unit

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Consolidated gross profit increased by ¥66 billion from ¥566 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥632 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. This was primarily due to an increase innon-asset related income.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥40 billion from ¥241 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥281 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Others increased by ¥8 billion from ¥39 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥47 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. This was primarily due to an increase in profit of The Bank of East Asia, Limited, which is our equity-method associate, reflecting gains on sale of its subsidiary.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥35 billion from ¥363 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥398 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Consolidated gross profit decreased by ¥23 billion from ¥589 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥566 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This was primarily due to a decrease in consolidated gross profit related to commercial banking business of SMBC.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥4 billion from ¥237 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥241 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Others increased by ¥63 billion from a loss of ¥24 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥39 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This was because a part of goodwill related to PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk, which is our equity-method associate, was impaired in the previous fiscal year.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥35 billion from ¥328 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥363 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2020.

Global Markets Business Unit

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Consolidated gross profit increased by ¥9 billion from ¥347 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥461 billion and increased by ¥22 billion compared to ¥356 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2020. This was primarily due to a nimble portfolio management with a focus on Japanese stocks in the volatile market environment.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥4 billion from ¥50 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥83 billion and increased by ¥3 billion compared to ¥54 billionthe fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

Others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Others increased by ¥10 billion from ¥8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥18 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021 was ¥36 billion.

As a result, consolidated net business profit increased by ¥15 billion from ¥305 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 was ¥414 billion and increased by ¥22 billion compared to ¥320 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2020.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Consolidated gross profit decreased by ¥7 billion from ¥354 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥347 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This was primarily due to a decrease in profits from equity index-linked investment trusts.

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥1 billion from ¥49 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥50 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Others decreased by ¥1 billion from ¥9 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

As a result, consolidated net business profit decreased by ¥9 billion from ¥314 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥305 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.

Financial Condition

Assets

Our total assets increased by ¥1,024,585¥22,866,524 million from ¥191,150,981¥212,158,463 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥192,175,566¥235,024,987 million at March 31, 2018.2021. The increase was primarily due to increases in cash and deposits with banks and investment securities, despite of the exclusion of all the assets, including loans and advances, of Kansai Urban Banking Corporation (“KUBC”) and THE MINATO BANK, LTD. (“The Minato Bank”), which ceased to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.securities.

Our assets at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Cash and deposits with banks

  ¥54,696,069   ¥47,330,155 

Call loans and bills bought

   1,881,880    1,872,209 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

   8,491,703    8,924,385 

Trading assets

   3,169,123    3,776,671 

Derivative financial instruments

   3,885,271    4,063,982 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   1,547,672    1,599,093 

Investment securities

   20,495,075    19,073,937 

Loans and advances

   85,129,070    95,273,845 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

   730,414    675,704 

Property, plant and equipment

   1,510,132    2,686,055 

Intangible assets

   835,902    1,096,568 

Other assets

   4,043,908    4,321,724 

Current tax assets

   87,961    240,385 

Deferred tax assets

   19,436    81,961 

Assets held for sale

   5,651,950    134,307 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  ¥192,175,566   ¥191,150,981 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Cash and deposits with banks

  ¥73,090,816   ¥62,471,453 

Call loans and bills bought

   2,553,468    898,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

   11,738,072    13,745,996 

Trading assets

   3,140,736    2,785,016 

Derivative financial instruments

   5,521,617    6,279,801 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   1,744,848    1,478,356 

Investment securities

   31,051,461    21,864,386 

Loans and advances

   97,714,938    94,671,818 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

   886,685    826,736 

Property, plant and equipment

   1,754,661    1,764,611 

Intangible assets

   819,720    835,477 

Other assets

   4,945,631    4,272,630 

Current tax assets

   33,376    161,729 

Deferred tax assets

   28,958    102,198 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  ¥235,024,987   ¥212,158,463 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans and Advances

Our main operating activity is the lending business. We make loans and extend other types of credit principally to corporate and individual customers in Japan and to corporate and sovereign customers in foreign countries.

At March 31, 2018,2021, our loans and advances were ¥85,129,070¥97,714,938 million, or 44%42% of total assets, representing a decreasean increase of ¥10,144,775¥3,043,120 million, or 11%3%, from ¥95,273,845¥94,671,818 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The decreaseincrease in loans and advances was primarily due to an increase in those to domestic customers, mainly corporate customers. At the exclusionbeginning of loans and advances made by KUBC and The Minato Bank, and the reclassification of loans and advances made by SMFL to assets held for sale. KUBC and The Minato Bank ceased to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and SMFL will cease2021, the balance of loans to be our consolidated subsidiary and will become our joint venture for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. For more information, see “Item 4.B.Business Overview—Description of Operations and Principal Activities.” In addition, decreases in loans and advances of SMBC to the Government of Japan and domestic corporate customers contributedincreased as a result of our response to their financial needs arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thereafter, the balance of loans began to decrease in loans and advances.due to repayments, but the balance at March 31, 2021 was still above the level at March 31, 2020.

Domestic

Through SMBC and other banking andnon-bank subsidiaries, we make loans to a broad range of industrial, commercial and individual customers in Japan. The following table shows our outstanding loans and advances to customers whose domiciles are in Japan, classified by industry, before deducting the allowance for loan losses, and adjusting unearned income, unamortizedpremiums-net and deferred loanfees-net at the dates indicated.

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Manufacturing

  ¥7,961,620   ¥9,578,147 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   145,957    174,021 

Construction

   947,765    1,151,989 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   5,424,054    5,365,225 

Wholesale and retail

   5,288,767    5,721,005 

Finance and insurance

   2,777,862    2,844,546 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   9,017,664    10,101,846 

Services

   4,255,228    4,885,247 

Municipalities

   1,000,286    1,216,211 

Lease financing

   14,629    2,706,641 

Consumer(1)

   16,363,489    19,096,755 

Others(2)

   4,633,306    5,178,461 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

  ¥57,830,627   ¥68,020,094 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Manufacturing

  ¥10,174,683   ¥8,787,566 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   277,471    280,233 

Construction

   886,539    919,043 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   5,878,522    5,637,560 

Wholesale and retail

   6,014,746    5,375,802 

Finance and insurance

   3,423,625    3,217,545 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   11,760,698    10,666,446 

Services

   4,831,938    4,452,195 

Municipalities

   625,639    839,878 

Lease financing

   24,678    8,380 

Consumer(1)

   15,274,719    15,691,638 

Others(2)

   4,133,900    4,308,469 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

  ¥  63,307,158   ¥  60,184,755 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

The balance in Consumer mainly consists of housing loans. The housing loan balances amounted to ¥11,482,678¥10,736,709 million and ¥13,766,771¥10,913,869 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

(2)

The balance in Others includes loans and advances to the Government of Japan.

Foreign

The following table shows the outstanding loans and advances to our customers whose domiciles are not in Japan, classified by industry, before deducting the allowance for loan losses, and adjusting unearned income, unamortizedpremiums-net and deferred loanfees-net at the dates indicated.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Public sector

  ¥372,008   ¥299,746   ¥309,372   ¥335,071 

Financial institutions

   4,496,646    4,588,001    7,241,844    6,220,956 

Commerce and industry

   21,023,885    21,041,905    24,659,663    25,597,599 

Lease financing

   357,660    404,658    306,988    309,531 

Others

   1,779,101    1,836,322    3,000,530    2,994,838 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign

  ¥28,029,300   ¥28,170,632   ¥  35,518,397   ¥  35,457,995 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

We calculate the allowance for loan losses using the latest assignment of obligor grades (our internal credit rating) and supplementary data such as the borrowers’ operating cash flows, realizable value of collateral and recent economic conditions.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, the allowance for loan losses decreasedincreased by ¥188,780¥142,882 million, or 28%20%, from ¥680,456¥706,405 million at March 31, 2017the beginning of the period to ¥491,676¥849,287 million at March 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to the exclusionend of the allowance for loans and advances made by KUBC and The Minato Bank, which ceased to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The allowance for loans and advances made by SMFL which will cease to be our consolidated subsidiary and will become our joint venture for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019 was also excluded.period.

The provision for loan losses decreased by ¥14,834 million from ¥141,457 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥126,623 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the provision for loan losses reflecting gradual recovery of the Japanese and global economy.

Charge-offs decreased by ¥5,448 million from the previous fiscal year to ¥185,060 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. Charge-offs of domestic loans and advances increased by ¥4,153 million compared to the previous fiscal year to ¥161,526 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to an increase in charge-offs related to consumer loans. Charge-offs of foreign loans and advances decreased by ¥9,601 million compared to the previous fiscal year to ¥23,534 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease in charge-offs related to customers from the commerce and industry.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the allowance for loan losses decreased by ¥42,261 million, or 6%, from ¥722,717 million at March 31, 2016 to ¥680,456 million at March 31, 2017. The balance of the allowance for loan losses increases when thea provision for loan losses is recognized and decreases when charge-offs are recognized through the sales of loans and write-offs. As we recorded a provision for loan losses of ¥141,457¥277,085 million and charge-offs of ¥190,508¥161,603 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and charge-offs exceeded2021, the provision for loan losses exceeded charge-offs and the overall allowance for loan losses decreased.increased.

The provision for loan losses increased by ¥22,707¥27,607 million from ¥118,750to ¥277,085 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162021 as compared to ¥141,457¥249,478 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2020. The increase was

primarily due to an increase in the provision for loan losses related to our domestic customers.corporate customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the obligor grades of many corporate borrowers severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic were downgraded to the extent that the credit risk on loans and advances to such borrowers was determined to be significantly increased since initial recognition and their allowance for loan losses was measured at an amount equal to the lifetime ECL.

Charge-offs decreasedincreased by ¥3,141¥7,611 million from the previous fiscal year to ¥190,508¥161,603 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2021. Charge-offs of domestic loans and advances decreased by ¥16,058¥29,391 million compared to the previous fiscal year to ¥157,373¥96,937 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in charge-offs related to customers from the real estate and goods rental and leasing.2021. Charge-offs of foreign loans and advances increased by ¥12,917¥37,002 million compared to the previous fiscal year to ¥33,135¥64,666 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase in charge-offs related to customers from the commerce and industry.2021.

The following table showstables show our allowance for loan losses for each of the periods indicated.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 
   (In millions) 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

  ¥680,456  ¥722,717  ¥793,552 

Provision for loan losses

   126,623   141,457   118,750 

Charge-offs:

    

Domestic

   161,526   157,373   173,431 

Foreign

   23,534   33,135   20,218 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   185,060   190,508   193,649 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Recoveries:

    

Domestic

   9,658   9,852   9,477 

Foreign

   574   445   871 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   10,232   10,297   10,348 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   174,828   180,211   183,301 

Others(1)

   (140,575  (3,507  (6,284
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period

  ¥491,676  ¥680,456  ¥722,717 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2021 
   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-
impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Allowance for loan losses :

     

Balance at April 1, 2020

  ¥203,286  ¥147,382  ¥355,737  ¥706,405 

Net transfers between stages

   (8,021  (18,280  26,301   —   

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   (29,279  123,622   182,742   277,085 

Charge-offs(1)

   —     —     161,603   161,603 

Recoveries

   —     —     12,801   12,801 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   —     —     148,802   148,802 

Others(2)

   4,170   3,185   7,244   14,599 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2021

  ¥  170,156  ¥  255,909  ¥  423,222  ¥  849,287 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2020 
   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-
impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Allowance for loan losses :

     

Balance at April 1, 2019

  ¥158,094  ¥92,446  ¥354,448  ¥604,988 

Net transfers between stages

   (3,184  (4,503  7,687   —   

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   52,085   60,724   136,669   249,478 

Charge-offs(1)

   —     —     153,992   153,992 

Recoveries

   —     —     12,413   12,413 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   —     —     141,579   141,579 

Others(2)

   (3,709  (1,285  (1,488  (6,482
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

�� 

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2020

  ¥203,286  ¥147,382  ¥355,737  ¥706,405 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Charge-offs consist of the reduction of allowance through the sales of loans and write-offs.

(2)

Others mainly include the exclusion of the allowanceforeign exchange translations for loans and advances made by KUBC and The Minato Bank, both of which had been our subsidiaries but became our equity-method associates, and the exclusion of the allowance for loans and advances made by SMFL which were reclassified as assets held for sale during the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2018. The amount for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172021 and 2016 mainly includes foreign exchange transactions.2020.

Impaired Loans and Advances

A portion of the total domestic and foreign loans and advances consists of impaired loans and advances, which are comprised of “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more (loans),” “restructured (loans)” and “other impaired (loans and advances).” The loans and

advances for which management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply in the near future with the repayment terms are wholly included in impaired loans and advances.

“Potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances)” comprise loans and advances to borrowers that are perceived to have a high risk of falling into bankruptcy, may not have been legally or formally declared bankrupt but are essentially bankrupt, or have been legally or formally declared bankrupt.

Loans classified as “past due three months or more (loans)” represent those loans that are three months or more past due as to principal or interest, which are not included in “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances).”

The category “restructured (loans)” comprises loans not included above for which the terms of the loans have been modified to grant concessions because of problems with the borrower.

“Other impaired (loans and advances)” represent impaired loans and advances, which are not included in “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more

(loans),” or “restructured (loans),” but for which information about credit problems cause management to classify them as impaired loans and advances.

The following table shows the distribution of impaired loans and advances by “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more (loans),” “restructured (loans)” and “other impaired (loans and advances)” at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 by domicile and type of industry of the borrowers. At March 31, 2018,2021, gross impaired loans and advances were ¥878,868¥1,171,576 million, a decreasean increase of ¥349,820¥326,247 million from ¥1,228,688¥845,329 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The ratio of gross impaired loans and advances to the outstanding loans and advances before deducting the allowance for loan losses, and adjusting unearned income, unamortizedpremiums-net and deferred loanfees-net was 1.0%1.2% at March 31, 2018, a decrease2021, an increase of 0.3 percentage points from 1.3%0.9% at March 31, 2017.2020.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Potentially bankrupt, effectively bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and  advances):

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  ¥62,322  ¥106,178 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   6,369   2,250 

Construction

   10,439   24,430 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   15,494   23,692 

Wholesale and retail

   74,332   104,472 

Finance and insurance

   3,021   4,135 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   32,634   126,179 

Services

   50,858   91,943 

Lease financing

   —     7,513 

Consumer

   157,221   194,721 

Others

   23,081   25,059 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

   435,771   710,572 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

   

Financial institutions

   30   29 

Commerce and industry

   144,975   157,227 

Lease financing

   —     11,892 

Others

   22,383   23,890 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

   167,388   193,038 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   603,159   903,610 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Past due three months or more (loans):

   

Domestic

   21,649   20,808 

Foreign

   —     11,449 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   21,649   32,257 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Restructured (loans):

   

Domestic

   136,582   155,100 

Foreign

   17,567   25,741 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   154,149   180,841 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other impaired (loans and advances):

   

Domestic

   93,175   103,777 

Foreign

   6,736   8,203 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   99,911   111,980 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross impaired loans and advances

   878,868   1,228,688 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses for impaired loans and advances

   (369,386  (532,451
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net impaired loans and advances

  ¥509,482  ¥696,237 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   At March 31, 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

Potentially bankrupt, virtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances):

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  ¥63,894  ¥44,640 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   7,836   7,648 

Construction

   8,086   10,008 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   36,177   35,562 

Wholesale and retail

   75,040   67,810 

Finance and insurance

   6,842   5,556 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   26,658   28,189 

Services

   64,574   44,040 

Consumer

   156,133   162,881 

Others

   23,474   19,475 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

   468,714   425,809 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

   

Financial institutions

   11,632   29 

Commerce and industry

   179,199   137,438 

Others

   23,012   9,118 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

   213,843   146,585 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   682,557   572,394 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Past due three months or more (loans):

   

Domestic

   37,297   27,923 

Foreign

   —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   37,297   27,923 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Restructured (loans):

   

Domestic

   228,631   144,034 

Foreign

   146,324   42,123 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   374,955   186,157 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other impaired (loans and advances):

   

Domestic

   36,343   52,020 

Foreign

   40,424   6,835 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   76,767   58,855 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross impaired loans and advances

   1,171,576   845,329 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses for impaired loans and advances

   (423,222  (355,737
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net impaired loans and advances

  ¥748,354  ¥489,592 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

In addition to the discussion in this section, see Note 4546 “Financial Risk Management—Credit Risk” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Investment Securities

Our investment securities, includingavailable-for-sale financial assets debt instruments at amortized cost, debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income andheld-to-maturity investments, equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, totaled ¥20,495,075¥31,051,461 million at March 31, 2018,2021, an increase of ¥1,421,138¥9,187,075 million, or 7%42%, from ¥19,073,937¥21,864,386 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The increase in our investment securities was primarily due to an increaseincreases in our holdings of Japanese government bonds.bonds and U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds, which were partially offset by a decrease in our holdings of mortgage-backed securities.

Our bond portfolio is principally held for asset and liability management purposes. Our bond portfolioIt mostly consisted of Japanese government bonds, U.S. Treasury securities and bonds issued or guaranteed by otherforeign governments, andgovernment agencies or official institutions.

Ourheld-to-maturity investments debt instruments at amortized cost amounted to ¥372,459¥72,015 million at March 31, 2018,2021, a decrease of ¥800,960¥248,756 million, or 68%78%, from ¥1,173,419¥320,771 million at March 31, 2017,2020, primarily due to redemptions at maturity of Japanese government bonds, which are the principal components of ourheld-to-maturity investments portfolio.bonds.

Domesticavailable-for-sale financial assets included ¥8,028,936 million of domestic debt instruments at March 31, 2018, an increase of ¥1,859,932 million, or 30%, from ¥6,169,004fair value through other comprehensive income amounted to ¥15,752,438 million at March 31, 2017.2021, an increase of ¥8,147,385 million, or 107%, from ¥7,605,053 million at March 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in our holdings of Japanese government bonds. Moreover,As for our foreign debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, we manage the average duration of our Japanese government bonds to be short, and Japanese government bonds with a maturity of less than five years accounted for 91% of our total Japanese government bondshad ¥10,640,197 million at March 31, 2018. As for our foreignavailable-for-sale financial assets, we had ¥6,253,770 million of foreign debt instruments,2021, which was an increase of ¥299,004¥191,086 million, or 5%2%, from ¥5,954,766¥10,449,111 million at March 31, 2017.2020. Most of our foreign debt instruments, including mortgage-backed securities, are issued or guaranteed by foreign governments, government agencies or official institutions. The increase was primarily due to an increase in our holdings of bonds issued byU.S. Treasury and other governments and official institutions.U.S. government agency bonds. Net unrealized losses on our foreign debt instruments amounted to ¥165,863¥24,243 million at March 31, 2018,2021, as compared to net unrealized lossesgains of ¥128,474¥235,111 million at March 31, 2017.2020. This was primarily due to a risedecline in the fair value of the foreign debt instruments held, reflecting to increases in U.S. interest rates. Of ourrates, together with the disposal during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 of foreign debt instruments 57% had a maturity of less than five years.with unrealized gains at March 31, 2020.

We had ¥5,161,734¥3,919,787 million of domestic equity instruments and ¥678,176¥667,024 million of foreign equity instruments at March 31, 2018.2021, for which we made an irrevocable election at initial recognition to present subsequent changes in fair value in other comprehensive income under IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments.” Our domestic equity instruments, which consisted principally of publicly traded Japanese stocks and included common and preferred stocks issued by our customers, increased by ¥44,105¥895,056 million, or 1%30%, from ¥5,117,629¥3,024,731 million at March 31, 2017.2020. Net unrealized gains on our domestic equity instruments increased by ¥228,469¥962,690 million, or 8%62%, from ¥2,696,122¥1,564,351 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥2,924,591¥2,527,041 million at March 31, 2018.2021. The increase was primarily due to a risean increase in the market pricesfair value of these stocks in a market environment where, as described in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Operating Environment,” the Nikkei Stock Average rose from ¥18,909.26 at March 31, 2017 to ¥21,454.30 at March 30, 2018.publicly traded Japanese stocks. Net unrealized gains on our foreign equity instruments increased by ¥39,573¥196,600 million, or 13%59%, from ¥296,448¥333,664 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥336,021¥530,264 million at March 31, 2018,2021, mainly reflecting favorable conditions in overseas stock markets.

We recognize the risks associated with our equity portfolio, owing to its volatility, and have been actively looking to minimize the negative effect of holding a large equity portfolio through economic hedging and derivative transactions.

We have no transactions pursuant to repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or other transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase such transferred assets that are treated as sales for accounting purposes.

The following tables show the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of our investment securities, which are classified asheld-to-maturity investments debt instruments at amortized cost, debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income andavailable-for-sale financial assets equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

                                
 At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
 Amortized
cost
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value  Amortized
cost(1)
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

    

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥372,459  ¥2,138  ¥—    ¥374,597  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   

Japanese municipal bonds

  —     —     —     —     22,300   2   62   22,240 

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 372,459  2,138   —    374,597   22,300   2   62   22,240 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  47,129   221   239   47,111 

Other debt instruments

  2,586   —     43   2,543 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  49,715   221   282   49,654 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥372,459  ¥2,138  ¥—    ¥374,597  ¥72,015  ¥223  ¥344  ¥71,894 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥7,675,028  ¥14,554  ¥4,279  ¥7,685,303  ¥14,305,742  ¥1,507  ¥13,638  ¥14,293,611 

Japanese municipal bonds

 47,079  49  96  47,032   733,275   414   1,067   732,622 

Japanese corporate bonds

 295,503  1,221  123  296,601   727,473   1,111   2,689   725,895 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 8,017,610  15,824  4,498  8,028,936 

Equity instruments

 2,237,143  2,946,737  22,146  5,161,734 

Other debt instruments

  310   —     —     310 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 10,254,753  2,962,561  26,644  13,190,670   15,766,800   3,032   17,394   15,752,438 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

        

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 3,387,109  1,723  142,186  3,246,646   5,601,838   49,692   86,586   5,564,944 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 2,192,099  4,203  8,852  2,187,450   3,006,178   8,231   20,377   2,994,032 

Mortgage-backed securities

 509,104  31  20,952  488,183   1,635,340   35,271   11,879   1,658,732 

Other debt instruments

 331,321  507  337  331,491   421,084   1,488   83   422,489 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 6,419,633  6,464  172,327  6,253,770 

Equity instruments

 342,155  340,366  4,345  678,176 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 6,761,788  346,830  176,672  6,931,946   10,664,440   94,682   118,925   10,640,197 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥17,016,541  ¥3,309,391  ¥203,316  ¥20,122,616  ¥26,431,240  ¥  97,714  ¥136,319  ¥26,392,635 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic

 ¥1,392,746  ¥2,592,655  ¥65,614  ¥3,919,787 

Foreign

  136,760   549,741   19,477   667,024 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥1,529,506  ¥3,142,396  ¥85,091  ¥4,586,811 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

                                
 At March 31, 2017  At March 31, 2020 
 Amortized
cost
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value  Amortized
cost(1)
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

    

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥1,160,751  ¥6,865  ¥—    ¥1,167,616  ¥260,079  ¥207  ¥—    ¥260,286 

Japanese municipal bonds

 7,463  12   —    7,475   22,300   1   67   22,234 

Japanese corporate bonds

 5,205  23   —    5,228   —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 1,173,419  6,900   —    1,180,319   282,379   208   67   282,520 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  37,358   145   —     37,503 

Other debt instruments

  1,034   —     —     1,034 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  38,392   145   —     38,537 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥1,173,419  ¥6,900  ¥—    ¥1,180,319  ¥320,771  ¥353  ¥67  ¥321,057 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥5,704,875  ¥23,952  ¥6,153  ¥5,722,674  ¥6,791,514  ¥5,725  ¥12,171  ¥6,785,068 

Japanese municipal bonds

 83,253  77  550  82,780   240,558   355   531   240,382 

Japanese corporate bonds

 361,656  2,459  565  363,550   579,508   1,655   1,870   579,293 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 6,149,784  26,488  7,268  6,169,004 

Equity instruments

 2,421,507  2,699,446  3,324  5,117,629 

Other debt instruments

  310   —     —     310 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 8,571,291  2,725,934  10,592  11,286,633   7,611,890   7,735   14,572   7,605,053 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

        

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 3,565,748  2,352  99,837  3,468,263   4,347,608   147,078   —     4,494,686 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 1,687,959  512  18,618  1,669,853   2,941,222   10,340   20,756   2,930,806 

Mortgage-backed securities

 646,206  33  12,610  633,629   2,708,432   99,481   100   2,807,813 

Other debt instruments

 183,327  300  606  183,021   216,738   593   1,525   215,806 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 6,083,240  3,197  131,671  5,954,766 

Equity instruments

 362,671  296,706  258  659,119 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 6,445,911  299,903  131,929  6,613,885   10,214,000   257,492   22,381   10,449,111 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥15,017,202  ¥3,025,837  ¥142,521  ¥17,900,518  ¥17,825,890  ¥265,227  ¥36,953  ¥18,054,164 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic

 ¥1,460,380  ¥1,693,714  ¥129,363  ¥3,024,731 

Foreign

  131,056   361,501   27,837   464,720 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥1,591,436  ¥2,055,215  ¥157,200  ¥3,489,451 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

                                
 At March 31, 2016  At March 31, 2019 
 Amortized
cost
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value  Amortized
cost(1)
 Gross unrealized
gains
 Gross unrealized
losses
 Fair value 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

    

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥2,241,491  ¥16,574  ¥—    ¥2,258,065  ¥280,246  ¥890  ¥—    ¥281,136 

Japanese municipal bonds

 20,849  26  3  20,872   —     —     —     —   

Japanese corporate bonds

 5,202  28   —    5,230   —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 2,267,542  16,628  3  2,284,167   280,246   890   —     281,136 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  36,827   106   39   36,894 

Other debt instruments

  1,841   —     —     1,841 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  38,668   106   39   38,735 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥2,267,542  ¥16,628  ¥3  ¥2,284,167  ¥318,914  ¥996  ¥39  ¥319,871 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic:

        

Japanese government bonds

 ¥6,481,951  ¥47,906  ¥1,282  ¥6,528,575  ¥5,005,649  ¥22,285  ¥239  ¥5,027,695 

Japanese municipal bonds

 31,081  157  17  31,221   98,427   742   5   99,164 

Japanese corporate bonds

 303,894  3,687  85  307,496   325,130   3,848   —     328,978 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 6,816,926  51,750  1,384  6,867,292 

Equity instruments

 2,319,411  2,385,454  36,566  4,668,299 

Other debt instruments

  26   —     —     26 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 9,136,337  2,437,204  37,950  11,535,591   5,429,232   26,875   244   5,455,863 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

        

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 2,243,096  5,237  2,203  2,246,130   4,469,336   28,497   71,198   4,426,635 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 2,130,938  10,107  2,052  2,138,993   2,112,607   10,590   1,790   2,121,407 

Mortgage-backed securities

 978,315  6,692  486  984,521   1,047,183   9,739   12,935   1,043,987 

Other debt instruments

 112,312  713  51  ��112,974   284,835   664   170   285,329 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 5,464,661  22,749  4,792  5,482,618 

Equity instruments

 375,016  227,025  22,445  579,596 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 5,839,677  249,774  27,237  6,062,214   7,913,961   49,490   86,093   7,877,358 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥14,976,014  ¥2,686,978  ¥  65,187  ¥17,597,805  ¥13,343,193  ¥  76,365  ¥86,337  ¥13,333,221 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic

 ¥1,600,072  ¥2,221,660  ¥92,612  ¥3,729,120 

Foreign

  95,989   368,511   20,728   443,772 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥1,696,061  ¥2,590,171  ¥113,340  ¥4,172,892 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(1)

“Amortized cost” for equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income represents the difference between the fair value and gross unrealized gains or losses.

The following tables show the fair value and gross unrealized losses of our investment securities, aggregated by the length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016. None of theavailable-for-sale equity instruments included in the tables have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more, since a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an equity instrument below its cost is considered to be an objective evidence of impairment and in such case the unrealized losses are reclassified from equity to profit or loss.2019.

 

                                                            
 At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
 Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total  Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total 
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
  Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

      

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥2,001  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥2,001  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   

Japanese municipal bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     2,300   —     16,238   62   18,538   62 

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 2,001   —     —     —    2,001   —     2,300   —     16,238   62   18,538   62 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

      

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  10,279   239   —     —     10,279   239 

Other debt instruments

  1,026   43   —     —     1,026   43 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  11,305   282   —     —     11,305   282 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥2,001  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥2,001  ¥—    ¥13,605  ¥282  ¥16,238  ¥62  ¥29,843  ¥344 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

      

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥2,847,250  ¥559  ¥1,353,121  ¥3,720  ¥4,200,371  ¥4,279  ¥7,019,285  ¥2,155  ¥3,208,353  ¥11,483  ¥10,227,638  ¥13,638 

Japanese municipal bonds

 964  1  31,916  95  32,880  96   338,284   606   140,848   461   479,132   1,067 

Japanese corporate bonds

 6,801  2  72,061  121  78,862  123   197,020   416   240,088   2,273   437,108   2,689 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 2,855,015  562  1,457,098  3,936  4,312,113  4,498 

Equity instruments

 506,969  22,146   —     —    506,969  22,146 

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 3,361,984  22,708  1,457,098  3,936  4,819,082  26,644   7,554,589   3,177   3,589,289   14,217   11,143,878   17,394 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

            

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 1,509,509  41,946  1,229,979  100,240  2,739,488  142,186   3,174,495   86,586   —     —     3,174,495   86,586 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 1,039,848  739  219,608  8,113  1,259,456  8,852   1,652,235   20,372   30,706   5   1,682,941   20,377 

Mortgage-backed securities

 1,124  1  482,141  20,951  483,265  20,952   594,950   11,874   1,511   5   596,461   11,879 

Other debt instruments

 141,058  161  17,269  176  158,327  337   160,498   80   14,329   3   174,827   83 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 2,691,539  42,847  1,948,997  129,480  4,640,536  172,327 

Equity instruments

 65,105  4,345   —     —    65,105  4,345 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 2,756,644  47,192  1,948,997  129,480  4,705,641  176,672   5,582,178   118,912   46,546   13   5,628,724   118,925 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥    6,118,628  ¥    69,900  ¥ 3,406,095  ¥  133,416  ¥    9,524,723  ¥    203,316  ¥13,136,767  ¥122,089  ¥3,635,835  ¥14,230  ¥16,772,602  ¥136,319 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic

 ¥24,850  ¥3,134  ¥164,109  ¥62,480  ¥188,959  ¥65,614 

Foreign

  6   384   23,149   19,093   23,155   19,477 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥    24,856  ¥      3,518  ¥    187,258  ¥    81,573  ¥    212,114  ¥    85,091 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

                                                            
 At March 31, 2017  At March 31, 2020 
 Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total  Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total 
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
  Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

      

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   

Japanese municipal bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     18,532   67   —     —     18,532   67 

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

  —     —     —     —     —     —     18,532   67   —     —     18,532   67 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

      

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥18,532  ¥67  ¥—    ¥—    ¥18,532  ¥67 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

      

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥1,427,268  ¥6,153  ¥—    ¥—    ¥1,427,268  ¥6,153  ¥4,367,384  ¥12,171  ¥—    ¥—    ¥4,367,384  ¥12,171 

Japanese municipal bonds

 68,154  543  2,383  7  70,537  550   153,889   527   9,556   4   163,445   531 

Japanese corporate bonds

 126,267  560  2,307  5  128,574  565   295,318   1,870   —     —     295,318   1,870 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 1,621,689  7,256  4,690  12  1,626,379  7,268 

Equity instruments

 170,399  3,324   —     —    170,399  3,324 

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 1,792,088  10,580  4,690  12  1,796,778  10,592   4,816,591   14,568   9,556   4   4,826,147   14,572 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

            

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 1,590,352  40,549  685,367  59,288  2,275,719  99,837   32,089   —     —     —     32,089   —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 1,238,536  18,587  60,616  31  1,299,152  18,618   1,453,583   20,756   —     —     1,453,583   20,756 

Mortgage-backed securities

 618,451  12,370  10,317  240  628,768  12,610   1,800   6   6,268   94   8,068   100 

Other debt instruments

 61,230  350  6,182  256  67,412  606   88,192   1,228   10,584   297   98,776   1,525 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 3,508,569  71,856  762,482  59,815  4,271,051  131,671 

Equity instruments

 10,105  258   —     —    10,105  258 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 3,518,674  72,114  762,482  59,815  4,281,156  131,929   1,575,664   21,990   16,852   391   1,592,516   22,381 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥    5,310,762  ¥    82,694  ¥    767,172  ¥    59,827  ¥    6,077,934  ¥    142,521  ¥6,392,255  ¥36,558  ¥26,408  ¥395  ¥6,418,663  ¥36,953 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic

 ¥144,382  ¥46,162  ¥139,484  ¥83,201  ¥283,866  ¥129,363 

Foreign

         45,541         1,216   15,024       26,621   60,565       27,837 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥189,923  ¥47,378  ¥    154,508  ¥109,822  ¥     344,431  ¥157,200 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

                                                            
 At March 31, 2016  At March 31, 2019 
 Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total  Less than twelve months Twelve months or more Total 
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
  Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair value Gross
unrealized
losses
 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

      

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   

Japanese municipal bonds

 4,386  3   —     —    4,386  3   —     —     —     —     —     —   

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 4,386  3   —     —    4,386  3   —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Foreign:

      

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  2,999   39   —     —     2,999   39 

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  2,999   39   —     —     2,999   39 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥4,386  ¥3  ¥—    ¥—    ¥4,386  ¥3  ¥2,999  ¥39  ¥—    ¥—    ¥2,999  ¥39 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

      

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic:

            

Japanese government bonds

 ¥675,693  ¥1,282  ¥—    ¥—    ¥675,693  ¥1,282  ¥—    ¥—    ¥296,652  ¥239  ¥296,652  ¥239 

Japanese municipal bonds

 3,893  16  775  1  4,668  17   —     —     9,555   5   9,555   5 

Japanese corporate bonds

 42,692  82  860  3  43,552  85   —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

 722,278  1,380  1,635  4  723,913  1,384 

Equity instruments

 425,494  36,566   —     —    425,494  36,566 

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 1,147,772  37,946  1,635  4  1,149,407  37,950   —     —     306,207   244   306,207   244 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

            

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

 857,102  2,164  22,474  39  879,576  2,203   907,418   8,721   1,316,145   62,477   2,223,563   71,198 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

 938,377  2,012  32,063  40  970,440  2,052   1,217,502   959   132,139   831   1,349,641   1,790 

Mortgage-backed securities

 8,294  44  12,013  442  20,307  486               412   1   432,651   12,934   433,063   12,935 

Other debt instruments

 44,965  30  2,077  21  47,042  51   138,685   111   11,930   59   150,615   170 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

 1,848,738  4,250  68,627  542  1,917,365  4,792 

Equity instruments

 160,245  22,445   —     —    160,245  22,445 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 2,008,983  26,695  68,627  542  2,077,610  27,237   2,264,017         9,792   1,892,865   76,301   4,156,882   86,093 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥    3,156,755  ¥    64,641  ¥      70,262  ¥         546  ¥    3,227,017  ¥      65,187  ¥2,264,017  ¥9,792  ¥2,199,072  ¥76,545  ¥4,463,089  ¥86,337 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Domestic

 ¥137,946  ¥31,563  ¥147,991  ¥61,049  ¥285,937  ¥92,612 

Foreign

  —     2   20,970       20,726   20,970       20,728 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥137,946  ¥31,565  ¥    168,961  ¥81,775  ¥     306,907  ¥113,340 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Trading Assets

The following table shows our trading assets at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. Our trading assets were ¥3,169,123¥3,140,736 million at March 31, 2018, a decrease2021, an increase of ¥607,548¥355,720 million from ¥3,776,671¥2,785,016 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a decreasean increase in our holdings of Japanese governmentcorporate bonds.

 

                    
  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Debt instruments

  ¥2,841,148   ¥3,339,928   ¥2,732,480   ¥2,545,703 

Equity instruments

   327,975    436,743    408,256    239,313 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total trading assets

  ¥    3,169,123   ¥    3,776,671   ¥    3,140,736   ¥    2,785,016 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Financial Assets at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss

The following table shows the fair value of our financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The fair value was ¥1,547,672¥1,744,848 million at March 31, 2018, a decrease2021, an increase of ¥51,421¥266,492 million from ¥1,599,093¥1,478,356 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to an increase in our holdings of investment funds, which was partially offset by a decrease in our holdings of debt instruments.non-trading bonds.

 

                    
  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Debt instruments

  ¥1,528,921   ¥1,582,957   ¥1,667,164   ¥1,454,387 

Equity instruments

   18,751    16,136    77,684    23,969 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥    1,547,672   ¥    1,599,093   ¥    1,744,848   ¥    1,478,356 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities

Our total liabilities increased by ¥416,069¥21,525,252 million from ¥179,263,698¥201,223,585 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥179,679,767¥222,748,837 million at March 31, 2018. Although all the liabilities of KUBC and The Minato Bank, which ceased2021, primarily due to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, were excluded, deposits other than those at KUBC and The Minato Bank increased.an increase in deposits.

The following table shows our liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

                    
  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Deposits

  ¥128,461,527   ¥130,295,290   ¥155,493,654   ¥138,431,418 

Call money and bills sold

   1,190,929    2,088,020    1,368,515    3,740,540 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

   12,022,593    9,424,506    18,509,906    15,455,782 

Trading liabilities

   2,143,899    2,071,584    2,080,826    2,018,484 

Derivative financial instruments

   3,498,016    3,889,694    4,949,433    5,555,201 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

   239,519    —   

Borrowings

   10,652,481    12,245,943    19,423,355    17,121,362 

Debt securities in issue

   10,569,117    11,165,623    11,228,600    10,985,048 

Provisions

   188,267    194,700    224,274    200,053 

Other liabilities

   6,882,740    7,461,101    8,777,502    7,601,355 

Current tax liabilities

   55,516    79,371    53,718    48,159 

Deferred tax liabilities

   397,741    320,201    399,535    66,183 

Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale

   3,616,941    27,665 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

  ¥179,679,767   ¥179,263,698   ¥222,748,837   ¥201,223,585 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deposits

We offer a wide range of standard banking accounts through the offices of our banking subsidiaries in Japan, includingnon-interest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, deposits at notice, time deposits and negotiable certificates of deposit. Domestic deposits, approximately 80%79% of total deposits, are our principal source of funds for our domestic operations. The deposits in the domestic offices of our banking subsidiaries are principally from individuals and private corporations, with the balance from governmental bodies (including municipal authorities), and financial institutions.

SMBC’s foreign offices accept deposits mainly in U.S. dollars, but also in yen and other currencies, and are active participants in the Euro-currency market as well as the United States domestic money market. Foreign deposits mainly consist of stable types of deposits, such as deposits at notice, time deposits, and negotiable certificates of deposit.

Our deposit balances at March 31, 20182021 were ¥128,461,527¥155,493,654 million, a decreasean increase of ¥1,833,763¥17,062,236 million, or 1%12%, from ¥130,295,290¥138,431,418 million at March 31, 2017,2020, primarily due to a decreaseincreases in timenon-interest-bearing demand deposits and interest-bearing demand deposits at domestic offices which was partially offsetboth from corporate customers proactively maintaining liquidity and from individual customers reflecting the provision of special cash payments to Japanese residents by an increasethe Japanese government as part of its economic measures to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic and a decline in demand deposits at domestic offices. The decrease in time deposits was mainly due to the exclusion of time deposits of KUBC and The Minato Bank, which ceased to be our subsidiaries and became our equity-method associates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.private consumption.

The following table shows a breakdown of our domestic and foreign offices’ deposits at the dates indicated.

 

                    
  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic offices:

        

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

  ¥20,370,064   ¥18,737,973   ¥26,509,136   ¥23,804,054 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   49,580,166    48,879,089    63,810,233    56,650,510 

Deposits at notice

   855,978    1,066,201    732,564    779,514 

Time deposits

   18,185,591    22,269,409    17,833,960    17,759,453 

Negotiable certificates of deposit

   5,408,021    6,021,236    5,603,154    4,081,741 

Others

   7,338,619    7,290,869    8,578,530    7,198,447 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic offices

   101,738,439    104,264,777    123,067,577    110,273,719 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign offices:

        

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

   1,241,450    1,115,579    1,760,079    1,503,721 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   2,574,099    2,402,906    4,825,345    3,122,179 

Deposits at notice

   9,499,686    9,264,068    10,730,094    9,989,980 

Time deposits

   7,469,541    7,256,466    7,985,027    7,264,055 

Negotiable certificates of deposit

   5,812,264    5,859,702    6,967,464    6,098,695 

Others

   126,048    131,792    158,068    179,069 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign offices

   26,723,088    26,030,513    32,426,077    28,157,699 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

  ¥128,461,527   ¥130,295,290   ¥155,493,654   ¥138,431,418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Borrowings

Borrowings include short-termunsubordinated borrowings, unsubordinated and subordinated long-term borrowings, liabilities associated with securitization transactions of our own assets, and lease obligations.liabilities. At March 31, 2018,2021, our borrowings were ¥10,652,481¥19,423,355 million, a decreasean increase of ¥1,593,462¥2,301,993 million, or 13%, from ¥12,245,943¥17,121,362 million at March 31, 2017,2020. The increase was primarily due to the reclassification of borrowings of SMFL to liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.an increase in unsubordinated borrowings.

At March 31, 2018, our short-term borrowings accounted for 37% of our total borrowings, and our long-term borrowings accounted for 52% of our total borrowings.

The following table shows the balances with respect to our borrowings at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Short-term borrowings

  ¥3,943,140  ¥7,546,496 

Long-term borrowings:

   

Unsubordinated

   5,230,453   3,138,582 

Subordinated

   265,000   284,200 

Liabilities associated with securitization transactions

   1,204,722    1,169,741  

Lease obligations

   9,166   106,924 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total borrowings

  ¥  10,652,481  ¥  12,245,943 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For more information, see Note 18 “Borrowings” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report, which sets forth summaries of short- and long-term borrowings with their contractual interest rates and currencies.

                    
   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Unsubordinated borrowings

  ¥17,565,291   ¥15,208,696 

Subordinated borrowings

   249,833    254,064 

Liabilities associated with securitization transactions

   1,227,590    1,272,714 

Lease liabilities

   380,641    385,888 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total borrowings

  ¥  19,423,355   ¥  17,121,362 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt Securities in Issue

Debt securities in issue at March 31, 20182021 were ¥10,569,117¥11,228,600 million, a decreasean increase of ¥596,506¥243,552 million, or 5%2%, from ¥11,165,623¥10,985,048 million at March 31, 2017,2020, primarily due to a decreasean increase in commercial paper, which was partially offset by an increase in bonds reflecting our efforts to expand foreign currency funding sources. Thea decrease in commercial paper was mainly due to the reclassification of commercial paper of SMFL to liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.subordinated bonds.

 

                    
 At March 31,   At March 31, 
 2018 2017   2021   2020 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Commercial paper

 ¥2,467,645  ¥3,518,346   ¥2,325,290   ¥1,736,702 

Bonds

 6,490,965  5,940,252 

Unsubordinated bonds

   7,625,948    7,693,431 

Subordinated bonds

 1,610,507   1,707,025     1,277,362    1,554,915 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total debt securities in issue

 ¥  10,569,117  ¥  11,165,623   ¥  11,228,600   ¥  10,985,048 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

For additional information, see Note 1920 “Debt Securities in Issue” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report, which sets forth summaries of debt securities in issue with their contractual interest rates and currencies.

In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that require future cash payments. “Item 5.F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” sets forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations at March 31, 2018.2021.

Total Equity

Our total equity increased by ¥608,516¥1,341,272 million from ¥11,887,283¥10,934,878 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥12,495,799¥12,276,150 million at March 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to increases in retained earnings and other reserves which were partially offset by a decrease innon-controlling interests resulting from the disposal of subsidiaries and the redemption of preferred securities. The increase in retained earnings mainly reflected our net profit.earnings. The increase in other reserves was primarily due to an increase inavailable-for-sale the financial assetsinstruments at fair value through other comprehensive income reserve reflecting a rise in market pricesthe fair value of domestic equity instruments. The increase in retained earnings mainly reflected our net profit.

  At March 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (In millions) 

Capital stock

 ¥2,338,743  ¥2,337,896 

Capital surplus

  863,505   864,052 

Retained earnings

  5,149,193   4,609,496 

Other reserves

  2,324,349   2,134,042 

Treasury stock

  (12,493  (12,913
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity attributable to shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

  10,663,297   9,932,573 

Non-controlling interests

  1,232,980   1,505,001 

Equity attributable to other equity instruments holders

  599,522   449,709 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

 ¥  12,495,799  ¥  11,887,283 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

For more information, see Note 2425 “Shareholders’ Equity” and Note 25“Non-controlling Interests and Equity26 “Equity Attributable to Other Equity Instruments Holders” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

                    
   At March 31, 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

Capital stock

  ¥2,341,274  ¥2,339,965 

Capital surplus

   722,595   728,551 

Retained earnings

   6,078,208   5,609,854 

Treasury stock

   (13,699  (13,984
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity excluding other reserves

   9,128,378   8,664,386 

Other reserves

   2,430,857   1,525,720 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity attributable to shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

   11,559,235   10,190,106 

Non-controlling interests

   68,379   60,296 

Equity attributable to other equity instruments holders

   648,536   684,476 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

  ¥  12,276,150  ¥  10,934,878 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Reconciliation with Japanese GAAP

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as summarized in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. These policies differ in some respects from Japanese GAAP. For reporting under the FIEAFinancial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (“FIEA”) and Japanese banking regulations, we prepare our annual financial results in accordance with Japanese GAAP. To show the major reconciling items between our IFRS and Japanese GAAP consolidated financial statements, we have provided below, with respect to our most recent fiscal year, a reconciliation of consolidated net profit and total equity under IFRS with those amounts under Japanese GAAP.

 

                    
 At and for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2018
   At and for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2021
 
 Total equity Net profit   Total equity Net profit 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

IFRS

 ¥12,495,799  ¥889,598   ¥12,276,150  ¥705,076 

Differences arising from different accounting for:

     

1. Scope of consolidation

 129,045  1,644    144,060   (5,731

2. Derivative financial instruments

 104,938  20,650    234,994   (94,826

3. Investment securities

 (355,744 (68,792   (342,876  (113,275

4. Loans and advances

 61,241  33,508    337,920   (60,866

5. Investments in associates and joint ventures

 (61,761 1,612    95,453   (3,417

6. Property, plant and equipment

 (11,439 (984   22,181   2,481 

7. Lease accounting

 3,535  515    799   (986

8. Defined benefit plans

 65,069  13,233    45,998   3 

9. Deferred tax assets

 (84,621 (35,051   (36,675  15,451 

10. Foreign currency translation

  —    (12,664   —     20,246 

11. Classification of equity and liability

 (603,528 (14,062   (658,420  (12,507

Others

 (128,865 15,216    (95,832  (15,365

Tax effect of the above

 (777 (6,097   (124,706  79,607 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Japanese GAAP

 ¥11,612,892  ¥     838,326   ¥  11,899,046  ¥       515,891 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The explanations below summarize certain differences between IFRS and Japanese GAAP that may be significant. The paragraphs below refer to the corresponding items as set forth in the table above.

1.

Scope of consolidation

Under Japanese GAAP, we consolidate an entity when we effectively control the decision making body of the entity’s operating and financing policies. Control is generally presumed to exist when we own more than half of the voting power, or own from 40% to 50% of the voting power and certain facts exist indicating control. Certain entities established for securitization are presumed not to be controlled. Under IFRS, we consolidate an entity when we control the entity. Control is generally presumed to exist when we are exposed, or have rights, to variable returns from our involvement with the entity and have the ability to affect those returns through our power over the entity. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are deemed to be substantive are taken into account when assessing the control. When assessing control of an entity under IFRS, we apply a single consolidation model to all types of entities, irrespective of their nature. This results in a difference in the scope of consolidation between Japanese GAAP and IFRS. Most significantly, certain entities designed for special purpose such as securitization, usually in the form of trusts under the Trust Act of Japan, are not consolidated under Japanese GAAP but consolidated under IFRS. Accordingly, both the cumulative gains on transfers of financial assets to these securitization vehicles and amortization of our retained subordinate interest under Japanese GAAP were not recognized under IFRS due to consolidation of such vehicles.

 

2.

Derivative financial instruments

Under Japanese GAAP, an embedded derivative shall beis separately accounted for when the host contract may suffer losses arising from the embedded derivative. Also, an entity may separately account for an embedded derivative if the entity manages it separately, even though the criteria for separation are not fully met. Under IFRS, when a hybrid contract contains a host that is not a financial asset, an embedded derivative shall beis separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, its economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract. Accordingly, certain embedded derivatives that are separately accounted for under Japanese GAAP but do not meet the criteria for separation under IFRS are adjusted such that they are combined with the host contract, and vice versa. In addition, theThe separation of the embedded derivatives from the host contract is adjusted so as not to result in any gain or loss at initial recognition under IFRS. On the other hand, under IFRS, when a hybrid contract contains a host that is a financial asset, an embedded derivative is not separately accounted for from the host.

We apply hedge accounting under Japanese GAAP. However, IFRS imposes onerous documentation and effectiveness testing requirements on entities wishing to apply hedge accounting. The result of these requirements is that it is more difficult to achievethe qualifying criteria for certain hedge accounting under IFRS are more rigorous than those under Japanese GAAP. TheTherefore, except for fair value hedge accounting and hedge accounting for net investments in foreign operations we apply under IFRS, the effects of hedge accounting under Japanese GAAP have therefore been reversed under IFRS, except for hedge accounting for net investments in foreign operations which was adopted on April 1, 2017.

Japanese GAAP and IFRS require OTC derivatives to be measured at fair value. In principle, there is no significant difference in the definitions of fair value, but in practice there is diversity in the application of valuation techniques used for fair value under Japanese GAAP and IFRS. Therefore to meet the requirements of fair value under IFRS, adjustments have been made to the fair values under Japanese GAAP to reflect credit risk adjustments for OTC derivatives. Certain guarantees under Japanese GAAP do not meet the definition of a financial guarantee under IFRS but meet that of a derivative. These guarantees are measured at fair value and the change in fair value is recognized in the consolidated income statement under IFRS.

 

3.

Investment securities

Under Japanese GAAP, certainstocks and financial assets classified asavailable-for-sale,instruments similar to stocks that are not traded in an active market, such as unlisted stocks, are measured at cost. However,cost if they are classified as available-for-sale, whereas, under IFRS,available-for-sale financial assets (and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss) should be those are measured at fair value. The fair value of financial instruments where there is no quoted price in an active market isvalues determined by using valuation techniques. In addition, the fair values of financial instruments under

Under Japanese GAAP, have been adjustedthe changes in order to meet the requirements of fair value under IFRS. For example, we use the last1-month average of the closing transaction prices for the fair value measurement ofavailable-for-sale financial assets (listed stocks)are recognized in other comprehensive income and subsequently transferred to profit or loss on their disposal. Under IFRS, we made an irrevocable election for some equity instruments to present subsequent changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. The changes in fair value of those equity instruments presented in other comprehensive income are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss. Some available-for-sale financial assets under Japanese GAAP, whereas closing spot

pricesincluding investment funds, are used under IFRS. Additionally under IFRS, we classify certain hybrid instrumentsclassified as financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, as weand therefore the changes in their fair values are unable to measure the embedded derivative separately from its host contract although it is required to separate the embedded derivative from the host contract. Accordingly, the change in fair value of such hybrid instruments is recognized in profit or loss.

Under Japanese GAAP, we recognize impairment ofavailable-for-sale equity instruments if the decline in fair value below the cost, less previously recognized impairment loss is in general 50% or more. Under IFRS, we assess whether there is objective evidence thatavailable-for-sale equity instruments are impaired, including a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value below cost and other qualitative impairment indicators. Additionally, under Japanese GAAP, we reverse impairment losses recognized in a previous interim period, whereas the reversal of the impairment losses on equity instruments is not allowed under IFRS.

 

4.

Loans and advances

Under Japanese GAAP, the reserveallowance for possible loan losses is calculated based on credit assessments at the end of the reporting period. A collective allowance is calculated using historical loss experience based on historical

results according to the obligor grade, adding forward looking information as appropriate. The allowance for specifically identified significant loans is calculated by the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method, which is based on the present value of reasonably estimated cash flows discounted at the original contractual interest rate of the relevant loan. The reserve for possible loan losses forFor the remaining loans, an individual allowance is collectively calculated using the historical loss experience, or individually calculated based on the estimated uncollectible amount considering the historical loss experience and the recoveries from collateral, guarantees and any other collectible cash flows. The historical loss experience for 1 year or 3 years, according to

Under IFRS, measurement of ECL depends on whether the obligor grade, is calculated basically basedcredit risk on the averaged historical results offinancial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition. If there is not a significant increase in credit risk on that financial asset since initial recognition, an allowance is measured at least the past three years. Under IFRS, thean amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses. Otherwise, an allowance is measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for loan losses for individually significant impaired loans is calculated by the DCF method based on the best estimatepresent value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate, which differs from the calculation of the DCF method under Japanese GAAP. The scope of the loans that are subject to the DCF method under IFRS is wider than that under Japanese GAAP. The allowance for loan losses for the remaining loans is collectively calculated by homogeneous group using statistical methods based on the historical loss experience and incorporating the effect of the time value of money. A qualitative analysis based on related economic factors is then performed to reflect theECL are measured in a way that reflects not only past events, but also current conditions at the endand forecasts of the reporting period. The allowance for thenon-impaired loan losses is calculated as incurred but not yet identified losses for the period between the impairment occurring and the loss being identified, which are different from the expected losses under Japanese GAAP.

future economic conditions. Under Japanese GAAP, loan origination fees and costs are generally recognized in the consolidated income statement as incurred. Under IFRS, loan origination fees and costs that are incremental and directly attributable to the origination of a loan are deferred and thus, included in the calculation of the effective interest rate.

Under both Japanese GAAP and IFRS, undrawn loan commitments are not recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position. Provisionoff-balance sheet. Provisions for the credit risk on these commitments is included as part of the reserve for possible loan losses. Under IFRS,undrawn loan commitments are not recognizedmeasured in the consolidated statement of financial position and a provisionway similar to those for the expected losses to usloans drawn down in relation to the loan commitments is measured based on IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.”accordance with each standard. Under Japanese GAAP, all guarantee contracts are accounted for by accruing both asset and liability accounts at the nominal guarantee amount. A provision for the credit risk of the guarantee is calculated using the same method as the reserve for possible loan losses and is included as part of it.losses. Under IFRS, a financial guarantee contract is specifically defined in IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” as a contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of the debt instruments. Financial guarantees are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently measured at the higher of the amount of the loss allowance determined in accordance with IAS 37ECL or the amount initially recognized (i.e., fair value) less, when appropriate, the cumulative amortizationamount of income recognized in accordance with IAS 18 “Revenue.”

the principles of IFRS 15.

5.

Investments in associates and joint ventures

Under Japanese GAAP, although goodwill related to investments in associates and joint ventures is included in the carrying amount of the investments, we are required to recognize and measure impairment losses only on goodwill separately from the investments if impairment indicators for the goodwill are identified. Under IFRS, for investments in associates and joint ventures, if we identify objective evidence of impairment, the entire carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment since goodwill is not separately recognized on the initial acquisition of the investment. Additionally, the net profit of associates and joint ventures is adjusted for differences between Japanese GAAP and IFRS in accordance with our accounting policy prior to applying the equity method under IFRS.

 

6.

Property, plant and equipment

For certain assets that are depreciated using the declining balance method under Japanese GAAP, we apply the straight-line method of depreciation to those assets under IFRS as we consider that the straight-line method most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in those assets. Additionally, under IFRS, residual values of assets are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. After reviews of all categories of property, plant and equipment, the residual values of assets are considered to be zero under IFRS, whereas residual values are assigned to certain assets under Japanese GAAP.

Furthermore, under IFRS, when any indication that assets may be impaired exists, the recoverable amount of an asset shall be determined. If the recoverable amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset shall be reduced to its recoverable amount and an impairment loss is recognized to

the extent that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount. On the other hand, under Japanese GAAP, when there is an indicator of impairment, whether impairment exists shall be determined by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flow. Then, if the undiscounted cash flows are lower than the carrying amount, the carrying amount is not considered to be recoverable and an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and the recoverable amount.

 

7.

Lease accounting

We account forUnder Japanese GAAP, a lease transaction as a lessee is classified as either a finance lease transactions withoutor an operating lease. Finance leases are recognized as assets and liabilities in statements of financial position, so there is no significant difference from IFRS. On the other hand, a transferlessee does not recognize assets and liabilities for operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized in the consolidated income statements on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Under IFRS, a single lessee accounting model, whereby a lessee accounts for all leases in the same way, requires a lessee to recognize a right of ownership commencing before April 1, 2008 as operating leases under Japanese GAAP. However, such accounting treatmentuse asset representing its right to use the underlying leased asset and a lease liability representing its obligation to make lease payments at the commencement date. After the commencement date, a right of use asset is not allowed under IFRS. Thus, we made certain adjustments for those transactions in ordermeasured applying the straight-line method of depreciation, and a lease liability is measured by increasing the carrying amount to comply withreflect interest and reducing the accounting treatment under IFRS. Fromcarrying amount to reflect the fiscal year beginning after April 1, 2008, a new Japanese GAAP standard for lease accounting became effective, which removed the differences for finance leases (with or without a transfer of ownership) between Japanese GAAP and IFRS. Therefore, no adjustment is needed for finance lease transactions entered into after April 1, 2008.payments.

 

8.

Defined benefit plans

Under Japanese GAAP, the present value of the defined benefit obligation is measured using the market yields of long-term Japanese government bonds as discount rates. Additionally, the discount rates for the previous reporting period can be used for the current reporting period, if the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation caused by a change in the discount rates from the previous reporting period to the current reporting period is less than 10%. Under IFRS, the present value of the defined benefit obligation is measured by discounting the estimated timing and amount of benefit payments using the discount rates reflecting market yields on high quality corporate bonds at the end of each reporting period.

Under Japanese GAAP, the expected rates of return on plan assets for the previous reporting period can be used for the current reporting period, unless the impact of the profit or loss for the current reporting period is considered to be significant. Under IFRS, the interest cost and expected return on plan assets are replaced with a net interest amount which is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability (asset).

Under Japanese GAAP, the actuarial gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, and are amortized using the straight-line method. Under IFRS, actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions in the year, and return on plan assets excluding interest income are recognized in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit and loss.

Under Japanese GAAP, past service costs are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized using the straight-line method. Under IFRS, past service costs are recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement.

9.

Deferred tax assets

Under Japanese GAAP, we recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that the realization of the tax benefit is highly probable based on the schedule. Under IFRS, deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized. For example, deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences relating to impairment of financial instruments of which the timing of the reversal is difficult to estimate cannot be recognized under Japanese GAAP, whereas they can be recognized under IFRS to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available.

 

10.

Foreign currency translation

Under Japanese GAAP, the income statement items of foreign operations are translated into Japanese yen, our presentation currency, using the (spot) closing rate, whereas under IFRS they are translated into the presentation currency using the exchange rate at the dates of the transactions or, if the exchange rates do not fluctuate significantly, at average exchange rates. In addition, under Japanese GAAP, certain foreign operations’ monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Japanese yen using the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period. However, under IFRS the monetary items for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are translated using the exchange rates at the dates of initial transactions.

 

11.

Classification of equity and liability

Under Japanese GAAP, a financial instrument is generally classified as an equity instrument or a financial liability in light of its legal form. Under IFRS, a financial instrument or its component parts are classified as equity instruments or financial liabilities in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement and the definitions of financial liabilities and equity instruments. A financial instrument is classified as a financial liability if there is a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset other than a fixed number of equity shares in exchange for a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset. In the absence of such a contractual obligation, the financial instrument is classified as an equity instrument.

5.B.     LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We consistently endeavor to enhance the management of our liquidity profile and strengthen our capital base to meet our customers’ loan requirements and deposit withdrawals and respond to unforeseen situations such as adverse movements in stock, foreign currency, interest rate and other markets, or changes in general domestic or international conditions.

Liquidity

We derive funding for our operations both from domestic and international sources. Our domestic funding is derived primarily from deposits placed with SMBC by its corporate and individual customers, and also from call money (inter-bank), bills sold (inter-bank promissory notes), repurchase agreements, borrowings, and negotiable certificates of deposit issued by SMBC to domestic and international customers. Our international sources of funds are principally from deposits from corporate customers and foreign central banks, negotiable certificates of deposit, bonds, commercial paper, and also from repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent. We closely monitor maturity gaps and foreign exchange exposure in order to manage our liquidity profile.

As shown in the following table, total deposits decreasedincreased by ¥1,833,763¥17,062,236 million, or 1%12%, from ¥130,295,290¥138,431,418 million at March 31, 20172020 to ¥128,461,527¥155,493,654 million at March 31, 2018.2021. The balance of deposits at March 31, 20182021 exceeded the balance of loans and advances by ¥43,332,457¥57,778,716 million, primarily due to the stable deposit base in Japan. Ourloan-to-deposit ratio (total loans and advances divided by total deposits) in the same period was 66%63%, which contributed greatly to the reduction of our liquidity risk. Our balances of large-

denominationlarge-denomination domestic yen time deposits are stable due to the historically high rollover rate of our corporate customers and individual depositors.

 

  At March 31, 
  2018   2017   At March 31, 
          2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070   ¥95,273,845   ¥97,714,938   ¥94,671,818 

Deposits

   128,461,527    130,295,290    155,493,654    138,431,418 

We have invested the excess balance of deposits against loans and advances primarily in marketable securities and other highly liquid assets, such as Japanese government bonds. SMBC’s Treasury Unit actively monitors the movement of interest rates and maturity profile of its bond portfolio as part of SMBC’s overall risk management. The bonds can be used to enhance liquidity. When needed, they can be used as collateral for call money or other money market funding or short-term borrowings from the BOJ.

Secondary sources of liquidity include short-term debts, such as call money, bills sold, and commercial paper issued at an inter-bank or other wholesale markets. We also issue long-term debts, including both senior and subordinated debts, as additional sources of liquidity. With short- and long-term debts, we can diversify our funding sources, effectively manage our funding costs and enhance our capital adequacy ratios when appropriate.

We source our funding in foreign currencies primarily from financial institutions, general corporations, and institutional investors, through short- and long-term financing. Even if we encounter declines in our credit quality or that of Japan in the future, we expect to be able to purchase foreign currencies in sufficient amounts using the yen funds raised through our domestic customer base. As further measures to support our foreign currency liquidity, we hold foreign debt securities, maintain credit lines and swap facilities denominated in foreign currencies, and pledge collateral to the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank.

We maintain management and control systems to support our ability to access liquidity on a stable and cost-effective basis. For further information, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk—Market Risk and Liquidity Risk—Framework for Market and Liquidity Risk Management.”

We believe we are able to access such sources of liquidity on a stable and flexible basis by keeping credit ratings at a high level. The following table shows credit ratings assigned to the Company by Moody’s Japan K.K. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings Japan Inc. (“S&P”) and Fitch Ratings Japan Limited (“Fitch”) at May 31, 2018:2021:

 

At May 31, 20182021

Moody’s

  

S&P

  

Fitch

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

  

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

  

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

A1

  S  P-1  A-  PS    A  SN  F1

The following table shows credit ratings assigned to SMBC by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch at May 31, 2018:2021:

 

At May 31, 20182021

Moody’s

  

S&P

  

Fitch

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

  

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

  

Long-term

  

Outlook

  

Short-term

A1

  S  P-1  A  PS  A-1  A  SN  F1

We are assigned credit ratings by major domestic and international credit rating agencies. Credit ratings do not constitute recommendations to purchase, sell or hold a security, and rating agencies may review or indicate an intention to review ratings at any time. While the methodology and rating system vary among rating agencies, credit ratings are generally based on information provided by us or independent sources, and can be influenced

by the credit ratings of Japanese government bonds and broader views of the Japanese financial system. Any downgrade in or withdrawal of these credit ratings, or any adverse change in these ratings relative to other financial institutions, could increase our borrowing costs, reduce our access to the capital markets and otherwise negatively affect our ability to raise funds, which in turn could have a negative impact on our liquidity position.

The guidelines published by FSAthe Financial Services Agency of Japan (“FSA”) for LCRliquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations are based on the full text of the LCR standard issued by the BCBSBasel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) in January 2013. Under these guidelines, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain LCR of at least 100% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis, while the minimum LCR requirements are being phased in between March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2019 with an increase of 10% in each year starting from 60%.basis. The following table shows the LCRs of the Company and SMBC for the three months ended March 31, 2018.2021. Each figure is calculated based on our financial statements prepared in accordance with Japanese GAAP, as required by the FSA’s LCR guidelines.

 

   For the three months
ended March 31, 20182021(1)
 

SMFG (consolidated)

   127.7140.1

SMBC (consolidated)

   131.4143.3

SMBC (nonconsolidated)

   133.7149.5

 

(1)

Under the FSA’s LCR guidelines, LCR is set as the three-month average of the daily LCRLCRs for the three months ended March 31, 2018,2021, which is calculated by dividing the balance of high-quality liquid assets by the total net cash outflows on a daily basis for the same three months.

For further information, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations Regarding Capital Adequacy and Liquidity—Liquidity Requirement.”

Capital Management

With regard to capital management, we strictly abide by the capital adequacy guidelines set by the FSA. Japan’s capital adequacy guidelines are based on the Basel Capital Accord, which was proposed by the BCBS for uniform application to all banks which have international operations in industrialized countries. Japan’s capital adequacy guidelines may be different from those of central banks or supervisory bodies of other countries because they have been designed by the FSA to suit the Japanese banking environment. Our banking subsidiaries outside of Japan are also subject to the local capital ratio requirements.

Each figure for the FSA capital adequacy guidelines is calculated based on our financial statements prepared under Japanese GAAP.

The FSA capital adequacy guidelines permit Japanese banks to choose from the standardized approach, (“SA”), the foundation IRBinternal rating-based (“IRB”) approach and the advanced IRB approach for credit risk, and the basic indicator approach, (“BIA”), the standardized approach (“TSA”) and the AMAadvanced measurement approach (“AMA”) for operational risk. To be eligible to adopt the foundation IRB approach or the advanced IRB approach for credit risk, and the TSA or the AMA for operational risk, a Japanese bank must establish advanced risk management systems and receive prior approval from the FSA.

We and SMBC have adopted the advanced IRB approach since March 31, 2009 and the AMA since March 31, 2008.

In December 2010, the BCBS published the new Basel III rules text to implement the Basel III framework, which sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a

backstop to the risk-based requirement, measures to promote thebuild-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of two global liquidity standards. The main measures of the minimum capital requirements in the Basel III framework began onin January 1, 2013 and will behave been fully applied from January 1, 2019.

These capital reforms increase the The minimum common equity requirement, from 2% tothe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement and the total minimum capital requirement have been 4.5%, 6% and require8%, respectively since January 2015. Moreover, banks have been required to hold a capital conservation buffer which started to be phased in from January 2016 with the initial ratio of 0.625% and will reach 2.5% by January 2019, to withstand future periods of stress bringingsince January 2019. As a result, taking the totalcapital conservation buffer into account, the minimum common equity requirement, to 7%. Thethe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement was also increased from 4% to 6%, resulting in aand the total requirement of 8.5% when combined with the above-mentioned conservation buffer. The totalminimum capital requirement remains at the existing level of 8% but will increase tohave been 7%, 8.5% and 10.5% by, respectively since January 2019 due to the capital conservation buffer.2019. Furthermore, a countercyclical buffer within a range of 0% to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital has been implemented according to national circumstances. The GHOS also agreed on transitional arrangements for implementing the new requirements.

In addition to the above-mentioned minimum capital requirements and capital buffer requirements under Basel III, organizations identified by the FSB asG-SIBs, which includes us, are required to maintain an additional 1% to 2.5%2% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets which is commonly referred to as theG-SIB capital surcharge, based on the organization’s size, interconnectedness, substitutability, complexity and cross-jurisdictional activity as determined by the FSB. The amount ofG-SIB capital surcharge that applies to us based on the FSB’s determination will beis 1%. The FSB updates its list of risk-weighted assets when the requirements are fully applied from 2019. Under thephase-inG-SIBs arrangement for theG-SIB capital surcharge, we are currently required to maintain 0.75% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.on an annual basis.

To reflect the Basel III framework, the FSA changed its capital adequacy guidelines. Under the FSA capital adequacy guidelines, the new capital requirements are being phased in from March 31, 2013 through March 31, 2019. The minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement, and Tier 1 capital requirement and total capital requirement have been 4.5%, 6% and 6%8%, respectively since March 2015. The capital conservation buffer, countercyclical buffer and theG-SIB capital surcharge started to be phased in from March 31, 2016 and have been fully applied from March 2019 under the FSA capital adequacy guidelines.

OnIn December 7, 2017, the GHOSGroup of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (the “GHOS”) endorsed the outstanding Basel III regulatory reforms. For further details regarding the finalized Basel III reforms, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations Regarding Capital Adequacy and Liquidity—Capital Adequacy Requirement.”

In March 2015, the FSA published its leverage ratio guidelines, which have been applied from March 31, 2015, to help ensure broad and adequate capture of bothon- andon-and off-balance sheet sources of leverage for internationally active banks. The FSA’s leverage ratio guidelines are based on the text of the leverage ratio framework and disclosure requirements issued by the BCBS in January 2014.

Under the text of the leverage ratio framework, the BCBS indicated the minimum leverage ratio as 3% and monitored banks’ leverage ratio data in order to assess whether the design and calibration of a minimum leverage ratio of 3% is appropriate from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2017.

OnIn December 7, 2017, the definition and requirements of the leverage ratio were revised as part of the finalized Basel III reforms, under which the leverage ratio will beis based on a Tier 1 definition of capital and with the minimum leverage ratio will beof 3%. Under the finalized Basel III reforms,G-SIBs are required to meet a leverage ratio buffer, which will take the form of a Tier 1 capital buffer set at 50% of the applicableG-SIB capital surcharge. Various refinements were also made to the definition of the leverage ratio exposure measure. The leverage ratio requirements under the definition based on the framework issued by the BCBS in January 2014 were implemented as a Pillar 1 measurement from January 2018, and those under the revised definition and the leverage ratio buffer requirement for G-SIBs will be implemented as a Pillar 1 measurement from January 1, 2023.

In March 2019, the FSA published its guidelines for the leverage ratio applicable to banks and bank holding companies with international operations, which have been applied from March 2019. Under the FSA’s guidelines for the leverage ratio, banks and bank holding companies with international operations must maintain a leverage ratio of at least 3% on both a consolidated basis and a nonconsolidated basis from March 2019. On June 30, 2020, in light of the increasing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FSA published amendments to its guidelines for the leverage ratio, which mainly exclude deposits with the BOJ from the denominator for the calculation of the leverage ratio in order to maintain harmonization with the monetary policy implemented by the

BOJ and the prudential regulations for banks and other financial institutions. These amendments came into effect on June 30, 2020 and were scheduled to expire on March 31, 2021. On March 31, 2021, the FSA extended the expiry date of these amendments to March 31, 2022.

The table below presents our risk-weighted capital ratios, total capital, risk-weighted assets and leverage ratio under Japanese GAAP at March 31, 2018,2021, based on the Basel III rules.

 

   At March 31, 20182021 
   (In billions, except
percentages)
 

SMFG Consolidated:

  

Total risk-weighted capital ratio

   19.3618.61

Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   16.6916.96

Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   14.5016.00

Total capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital + Tier 2 capital)

  ¥12,304.112,289.3 

Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital)

   10,610.211,199.3 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

   9,217.410,562.8 

Risk-weighted assets

   63,540.366,008.0 

The amount of minimum total capital requirements(1)

   5,083.25,280.6 

Leverage ratio

   5.015.65

 

(1)

The amount of minimum total capital requirements is calculated by multiplying risk-weighted assets by 8%.

Common Equity Tier 1 capital consists primarily of capital stock, capital surplus and retained earnings relating to common shares, andnon-controlling interests that meet the criteria set forth in the FSA capital adequacy guidelines for inclusion in Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

Non-controlling interests arising from the issue of common shares by a fully consolidated subsidiary of a bank may receive recognition in Common Equity Tier 1 capital only if: (1) the instrument giving rise to thenon-controlling interest would, if issued by the bank, meet all of the criteria set forth in the FSA capital adequacy guidelines for classification as common shares for regulatory capital purposes; and (2) the subsidiary that issued the instrument is itself a bank or other financial institution subject to similar capital adequacy guidelines.

Non-controlling interests that will no longer qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Additional Tier 1 capital, or Tier 2 capital under Basel III started to be excluded from March 31, 2014 by increments of 20% and were fully phased out on March 31, 2018.

Regulatory adjustments such as goodwill and other intangibles, deferred tax assets, investment in the common equity capital of banking, financial and insurance entities and defined benefit pension fund assets and liabilities are applied mainly to the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in the form of a deduction. Such regulatory adjustments were phased in from March 31, 2014 through March 31, 2018.

Additional Tier 1 capital consists primarily of preferred securities and perpetual subordinated bonds.

Tier 2 capital consists primarily of subordinated debt securities.

Capital instruments such as preferred securities and subordinated debt issued on or after March 31, 2013 must meet the new requirements to be included in regulatory capital. Capital instruments issued prior to March 31, 2013 that do not meet the requirements set forth in the FSA capital adequacy guidelines no longer qualify as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital. However, if those capital instruments meet the requirements for transitional arrangements set forth in such guidelines, they can qualify as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital during thephase-out period beginning March 31, 2013. The remaining balance of thosenon-qualifying capital instruments recognized as Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital are being reduced in annual 10% increments and will be fully phased out by March 31, 2022.

At March 31, 2018, our consolidated total capital was ¥12,304 billion, Tier 1 capital was ¥10,610 billion, and Common Equity Tier 1 capital was ¥9,217 billion. Our total risk-weighted assets at March 31, 2018 were ¥63,540 billion.

On a consolidated basis, our total risk-weighted capital ratio was 19.36%, Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio was 16.69%, Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio was 14.50% and leverage ratio was 5.01% at March 31, 2018.

Our capital position and SMBC’s capital position depend in part on the fair market value of our investment securities portfolio, since unrealized gains and losses are included in the amount of regulatory capital. At March 31, 2013, unrealized gains and losses were counted as Tier 2 capital and Additional Tier 1 capital, respectively, but started to be counted as Common Equity Tier 1 capital from March 31, 2014 by increments of

20% and have been fully counted as Common Equity Tier 1 capital since March 31, 2018. Since our other securities (including money held in trust) with a readily ascertainable market value included unrealized gains and losses, substantial fluctuations in the Japanese stock markets may affect our capital position and the capital position of SMBC.

In addition, our capital position and SMBC’s capital position would be negatively affected if deferred tax assets cannot be recognized. Under Japanese GAAP, a company will lose its ability to recognize deferred tax assets if, in principle, it has substantial amounts of negative annual taxable income for each of past three consecutive years and current fiscal year, and is expected to have significant negative taxable income in the following fiscal year.

Set forth below is a table of risk-weighted capital ratios, total capital, risk-weighted assets and leverage ratio of SMBC at March 31, 20182021 on a consolidated and nonconsolidated basis.

 

   At March 31, 20182021 
   (In billions, except
percentages)
 

SMBC Consolidated:

  

Total risk-weighted capital ratio

   21.1417.72

Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   18.2215.89

Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   15.2913.98

Total capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital + Tier 2 capital)

  ¥10,931.110,612.4 

Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital)

   9,423.79,518.0 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

   7,908.78,374.7 

Risk-weighted assets

   51,707.559,871.2 

The amount of minimum total capital requirements(1)

   4,136.64,789.7 

Leverage ratio

   4.845.21

SMBC Nonconsolidated:

  

Total risk-weighted capital ratio

   21.1116.96

Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   18.1115.08

Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   15.0713.09

Total capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital + Tier 2 capital)

  ¥10,346.19,651.5 

Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital)

   8,875.38,580.9 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

   7,384.97,451.4 

Risk-weighted assets

   49,001.956,883.5 

The amount of minimum total capital requirements(1)

   3,920.14,550.7 

 

(1)

The amount of minimum total capital requirements is calculated by multiplying risk-weighted assets by 8%.

Our securities subsidiary in Japan, SMBC Nikko Securities is also subject to capital adequacy requirements under the FIEA described in “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations Regarding Capital Adequacy and Liquidity.” At March 31, 2018,2021, the capital adequacy ratio was 446.5%304.5% for SMBC Nikko Securities, and sufficiently above 140%, below which level it would be required to file daily reports with the Commissioner of the FSA.

5.C.     RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES

We did not conduct any significant research and development activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. However, there are certain research and development activities for our information system infrastructure.

5.D.    TREND INFORMATION

Our trend information is contained elsewhere in this annual report, including but not limited to “Item 4.B. Business Overview,” and “—A. Operating Results,” and “—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Item.

5.E.    OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

To meet our customers’ financingfinancial needs, we engage in various types ofoff-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business.

Our arrangements include loan commitments, financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities. Loan commitment contracts on overdrafts and loans are agreements to lend up to a prescribed amount to customers, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. Financial guarantees are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payments when due in accordance with the terms of the debt instrument. Other credit-related contingent liabilities include performance bonds, which are contracts that provide compensation if another party fails to perform the contractual obligation.

The table below shows the nominal amounts of undrawn loan commitments, and financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Loan commitments

  ¥60,107,128   ¥62,357,210   ¥71,677,806   ¥62,151,698 

Financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities

   8,426,245    7,924,711    9,872,696    9,204,996 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥68,533,373   ¥70,281,921   ¥81,550,502   ¥71,356,694 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The nominal amounts of theseoff-balance sheet instruments generally represent the maximum potential amounts of future payments without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held. For example, since many of these loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn down, the total amount of unused commitments does not necessarily represent an actual future cash flow requirement. Many of these loan commitments include clauses under which we can reject an application from customers or reduce the contract amounts in cases where economic conditions change, we need to secure claims, or some other significant event occurs. In addition, we may request the customers to pledge collateral such as premises and securities at the time of the contracts, and take necessary measures such as monitoring customers’ financial positions, revising contracts when the need arises and securing claims after the contracts are made. We regularly review the credit quality of the customer based on our risk management system as set forth in “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk” and Note 4546 “Financial Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

In addition to the above-mentionedoff-balance sheet arrangements, some of the SMBC Group’soff-balance sheet arrangements are related to activities of structured entities. For further information, see Note 4849 “Structured Entities” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

5.F.    TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that require future cash payments. The following table sets forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations at March 31, 2018.2021.

 

 At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
 Due in one year
or less
 Due from
one year to

three years
 Due from
three years to
five years
 Due after
five years
 Total(1)   Due in one year
or less
   Due from
one year to
three years
   Due from three
years to five
years
   Due after five
years
   Total(1) 
   (In millions)               (In millions)         

Time deposits

 ¥    21,663,526  ¥      2,681,152  ¥        652,130  ¥        644,395  ¥  25,641,203   ¥    22,282,443   ¥    2,533,546   ¥        459,395   ¥        545,607   ¥  25,820,991 

Negotiable certificate of deposits

 10,760,779  427,726  31,780  0  11,220,285    12,069,560    412,494    88,564    —      12,570,618 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

   92,741    51,183    18,746    73,869    236,539 

Borrowings

 7,262,141  601,326  652,481  2,126,169  10,642,117    7,830,220    4,615,101    4,800,771    1,792,917    19,039,009 

Debt securities in issue

 3,357,935  1,818,271  2,185,578  3,227,737  10,589,521    3,526,830    1,959,596    2,072,760    3,533,304    11,092,490 

Capital (finance) lease obligation

 2,567  2,999  1,665  3,086  10,317 

Operating lease obligation

 42,329  73,930  55,368  121,419  293,046 

Lease liabilities

   82,237    106,129    72,848    134,738    395,952 

Purchase obligation(2)

 33,442  20,934  5,735  0  60,111    41,971    14,625    2,263    2,782    61,641 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥43,122,719  ¥5,626,338  ¥3,584,737  ¥6,122,806  ¥58,456,600   ¥45,926,002   ¥9,692,674   ¥7,515,347   ¥6,083,217   ¥69,217,240 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

The amount of interest on debt instruments is not included in the maturity table above due to its insignificance.

(2)

Purchase obligation in the above table includes the contractual commitments to purchase goods or services of construction and information technology that are binding on us for the payment of more than ¥100  million.

5.G. ��  SAFE HARBOR

See the discussion under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

6.A.    DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Directors and Senior Management

We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. In order to further enhance our solid corporate governance system, we transitioned tohave adopted a company with three statutory committees on June 29, 2017.

system of corporate governance. Under the Companies Act, a company with three statutory committees is required to have a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee, each of which consisting of members of the board of directors and of which the majority of the members must be outside directors. In addition to the three statutory committees, we have voluntarily established our risk committee. Also, under the Companies Act, a company with three statutory committees must have one or more corporate executive officers elected by resolution of the board of directors. Corporate executive officers decide on the execution of the operations of the company that were delegated to them by resolution of the board of directors. The board of directors decides on the execution of operations of the company, including basic management policy, and supervises the execution of duties by corporate executive officers.

Our board of directors is comprised of seventeenfifteen directors, seven of whom are outside directors as defined under the Companies Act. In addition, our board of directors has elected ninefourteen corporate executive officers.

For more information, see “Item 6.C. Board Practices.”

Directors

At June 28, 2018,29, 2021, the following directors held the indicated positions with us:

 

Name


(Date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

 

Business experience

Koichi MiyataTakeshi Kunibe
(November 16, 1953)March 8, 1954)

 

Chairman of the Board of the Company

Chairman of the Board of SMBC

 

April 1976

 

Joined MitsuiSumitomo Bank

 

 

June 2003

 

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

October 2006

 

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2007

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2007

Director of the Company

 

April 2009

 

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2010

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2010

Director of the Company

April 2011

Director and President of the Company

Director of SMBC

April 2017

Chairman of the Board of the Company (to present)

Chairman of the Board of SMBC (to present)

Takeshi Kunibe
(March 8, 1954)

Director President of the Company (Representative Corporate Executive Officer)

Group Chief Executive Officer, or CEO

April 1976

Joined Sumitomo Bank

June 2003

Executive Officer of SMBC

October 2006

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2007

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2007

Director of the Company

April 2009

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2017

 

President of the Company

 

  

Resigned as Director of SMBC

 

  

June 2017

 

Director President of the Company (to present)

April 2019

Chairman of the Board of the Company (to present)

Makoto TakashimaJun Ohta
(March 31,February 12, 1958)

 

Director President of the Company
(Representative Corporate Executive Officer)

 

President of SMBCGroup Chief Executive Officer, or CEO

 

April 1982

 

Joined Sumitomo Bank

 

 

April 2009

 

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2012

 

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2014

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

December 2016

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

President of SMBC (to present)

June 2017

Director of the Company (to present)

Kozo Ogino
(May 9, 1958)

Director Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Risk Officer, or CRO

Officer in charge of Corporate Risk Management Department and Credit & Investment Planning Department

April 1981

Joined Mitsui Bank

April 2010

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2013

 

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

 

April 2014

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

June 2013

2014

 

Director of the Company

 

Director and Deputy President of SMBC 

April 20142015

 

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

  

April 2017

 

Director and Deputy President of the Company

 

   

Resigned as Director of SMBC

June 2017

Director Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

March 2018

Director and Deputy President of SMBC

April 2019

Director President of the Company (to present)

Resigned as Director of SMBC

Makoto Takashima
(March 31, 1958)

Director of the Company

April 1982

Joined Sumitomo Bank

President of SMBC

April 2009

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2012

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2014

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

December 2016

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

President of SMBC (to present)

 

  

June 2017

 Director Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Name


(Date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

 

Business experience

Jun OhtaToru Nakashima
(February 12, 1958)September 14, 1963)

 

Director Deputy President andSenior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company
(Representative Corporate Executive Officer)

 

Group Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, and Group Chief Strategy Officer, or CSO

 

Officer in charge of Public Relations Department, Corporate Planning Department, Financial AccountingBusiness Development Department and Subsidiaries & AffiliatesFinancial Accounting Department

 

Director and Deputy PresidentSenior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1986

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2014

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

General Manager of Corporate Planning Department of the Company

April 2016

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

March 2019

Director and Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2019

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

June 2019

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Teiko Kudo
(May 22, 1964)

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Risk Officer, or CRO

Officer in charge of Corporate Risk Management Department, Risk Management Department, Americas Division and Credit & Investment Planning Department

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1987

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2014

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2020

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

March 2021

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

April 2021

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

June 2021

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive

Officer of the Company (to present)

Atsuhiko Inoue
(July 3, 1957)

Director of the Company

April 1981

Joined Sumitomo Bank

Director of SMBC

April 2008

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2014

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

June 2014

Director of the Company

April 2015

Resigned as Director of the Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

June 2019

Director of the Company (to present)

Director of SMBC (to present)

Name
(Date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Toshihiro Isshiki
(September 15, 1962)

Director of the Company

April 1985

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2013

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Co-General Manager of General Affairs Department of the Company

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

April 2019

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2021

Retired as Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

June 2021

Director of the Company (to present)

Yasuyuki Kawasaki
(April 30, 1959)

Director of the Company

 

April 1982

 

Joined Sumitomo Bank

 

 

Representative Director, Chairman of the Board of SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. (“SMBC Nikko Securities”)

 

April 2009

 

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

  

April 2012

 

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

  

April 2013

 

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

 

  

April 2014

 

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

 

   

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

June 2014

Director of the Company

 

April 2015

 

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

  

April 2017

 

Director and Deputy President of the Company

 

Resigned as Director of SMBC

June 2017

Director Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

March 2018

Director and Deputy President of SMBC (to present)

Katsunori Tanizaki
(April 12, 1957)

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Information Officer, or CIO, and Group Chief Digital Innovation Officer, or CDIO

Officer in charge of IT Planning Department, IT Innovation Department, Data Management Department and Operations Planning Department

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1982

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2010

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

General Manager of IT Planning Department of the Company

April 2013

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

June 2015

Director of the Company

April 2017

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2017

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Toshikazu Yaku
(March 3, 1962)

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Compliance Officer, or CCO, and Group Chief Human Resources Officer, or CHRO

Officer in charge of Human Resources Department, Quality Management Department, General Affairs Department and Administrative Services Department

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1984

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2012

General Manager of Human Resources Department of the Company

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2014

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2016

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

March 2017

Director and Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

June 2017

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Name

(Date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Toshiyuki Teramoto
(September 15, 1958)

Director of the Company

Corporate Auditor of SMBC

April 1981

Joined Mitsui Bank

April 2008

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2014

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2015

Director of the Company

April 2016

Director of SMBC

June 2016

Standing Corporate Auditor of the Company

Corporate Auditor of SMBC (to present)

June 2017

Director of the Company (to present)

Toru Mikami
(August 27, 1960)

Director of the Company

April 1984

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2006

General Manager of Legal Department of SMBC

April 2013

Co-General Manager of General Affairs Department of the Company

April 2015

Senior Manager of Head Office of SMBC

June 2015

Standing Corporate Auditor of the Company

June 2017

Director of the Company (to present)

Tetsuya Kubo
(September 24, 1953)

Director of the Company

Representative Director, Chairman of SMBC Nikko Securities Inc.
(“SMBC Nikko Securities”)

April 1976

Joined Sumitomo Bank

June 2003

Executive Officer of SMBC

July 2006

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2008

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

April 2009

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2011

Deputy President and Executive Officer of the Company

   

Director and Deputy President of SMBC

 

Director of SMBC Nikko Securities

  

June 20112017

 

DirectorDeputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

 

  

March 2013April 2018

 

Resigned as DirectorDeputy Chairman of the Company

 

   

Resigned as DirectorDeputy Chairman of SMBC

 

  

April 20132020

 

Representative Director, President & CEORetired as Deputy Chairman of SMBC Nikko Securitiesthe Company

 

  

Retired as Deputy Chairman of SMBC

May 2020

Representative Director and Deputy President Executive Officer of SMBC Nikko Securities

April 20162021

 

Representative Director, Chairman of the Board of SMBC Nikko Securities (to present)

 

 

June 20162021

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

Masayuki Matsumoto(1)
(April 14, 1944)

 

Director of the Company

 

Special Advisor of Central Japan
Railway Company

 

April 1967

 

Joined the Japanese National Railways

 

 

April 1987

 

Joined Central Japan Railway Company

 

 

June 2004

 

President and Representative Director of Central Japan Railway Company

 

 

April 2010

 

Vice Chairman and Representative Director of Central Japan Railway Company

 

 

January 2011

 

Resigned as Director of Central Japan Railway Company

 

 

January 2011

 

President of Japan Broadcasting Corporation

 

 

January 2014

 

Retired from Japan Broadcasting Corporation

 

  

April 2014

 

Special Advisor of Central Japan Railway Company (to present)

 

 

June 2015

 

Director of SMBC

 

  

June 2017

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

   

Retired as Director of SMBC

Name


(Date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

 

Business experience

Arthur M. Mitchell(1)
(July 23, 1947)

 Director of the Company 

July 1976

 

Registered as an attorney at law, admitted in New York, the U.S.A. (to present)

 

 

January 2003

 

General Counsel of the Asian Development Bank

 

 

September 2007

 

Joined White & Case LLP

 

 

January 2008

 

Registered as Foreign Attorney in Japan (to present)

 

 

Registered Foreign Attorney in Japan at White & Case LLP (to present)

 

  

June 2015

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

Shozo Yamazaki(1)
(September 12, 1948)

 Director of the Company 

November 1970

 

Joined Tohmatsu Awoki & Co. (currently Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC)

 

 

September 1974

 

Registered as a certified public accountant (to present)

 

 

July 1991

 

Representative Partner of Tohmatsu & Co. (currently Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC)

 

 

June 2010

 

Retired from Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC

 

 

July 2010

 

Chairman and President of The Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants

 

 

July 2013

 

Advisor of The Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (to present)

 

 

April 2014

 

Professor of Tohoku University Accounting School

 

  

June 2017

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

Masaharu Kohno(1)
(December 21, 1948)

 Director of the Company 

April 1973

 

Joined Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan

 

 

August 2005

 

Director-General of Foreign Policy Bureau in Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan

 

 

January 2007

 

Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs (in charge of economy) of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan

 

 

February 2009

 

Ambassador of Japan to Russia

 

 

May 2009

 

Ambassador of Japan to Russia, Armenia, Turkmenistan and Belarus

 

 

March 2011

 

Ambassador of Japan to Italy

 

 

May 2011

 

Ambassador of Japan to Italy, Albania, San Marino and Malta

 

 

September 2014

 

Retired from office

 

  

June 2015

 

Director of the Company (to present)

Yoshinobu Tsutsui(1)
(January 30, 1954)

 

Director of the Company

 

Chairman of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

April 1977

 

Joined Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

July 2004

 

Director of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

January 2007

 

Director and Executive Officer of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

March 2007

 

Director and Managing Executive Officer of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

March 2009

 

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

March 2010

 

Representative Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

April 2011

 

President of Nippon Life Insurance Company

 

 

June 2017

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

 

April 2018

 

Chairman of Nippon Life Insurance Company (to present)

 

Name


(Date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

 

Business experience

Katsuyoshi Shinbo(1)
(April 8, 1955)

 

Director of the Company

 

April 1984

 

Registered as an attorney at law (to present)

 

 

November 1999

 

Attorney at law at Shinbo Law Office (currently Shinbo & Partners) (to present)

 

 

June 2015

 

Corporate Auditor of SMBC

 

 

June 2017

 

Director of the Company (to present)

 

  

Resigned as Corporate Auditor of SMBC

 

Eriko Sakurai(1)
(November 16, 1960)

 

Director of the Company

President and Representative Director of Dow Chemical Japan Limited

.

 

June 1987

 

Joined Dow Corning Corporation

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd.

President and Representative Director of Dow Silicones Holding Japan Co., Ltd.

 

May 2008

 

Director of Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd.

 

 

March 2009

 

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd. (to present)

 

 

May 2011

 

Regional President -Japan/Korea of Dow Corning Corporation

 

 

February 2015

 

President and Representative Director of Dow Corning Holding Japan Co., Ltd. (currently Dow Silicones Holding Japan Co., Ltd.)

June 2015

Director of the Company (to present)

 

 

May 2018

Executor, Dow Switzerland Holding GmbH, which is a Representative Partner of Dow Silicones Holding Japan G.K.

 

June 20152018

 

Chairman and CEO of Dow Toray Co., Ltd.

July 2020

President and Representative Director of the CompanyDow Chemical Japan Limited (to present)

 

(1)

Messrs. and Ms. Matsumoto, Mitchell, Yamazaki, Kohno, Tsutsui, Shinbo and Sakurai satisfy the requirements for an “outside director” under the Companies Act.

Corporate Executive Officers

At June 28, 2018,29, 2021, the following corporate executive officers held the indicated positions with us:

 

Name


(Date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

 

Business experience

Takeshi KunibeJun Ohta
(March 8, 1954)February 12, 1958)

 

 

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

 

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

 

Kozo OginoMasahiko Oshima
(May 9, 1958)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Manabu Narita
(March 29, 1959)September 13, 1960)

 

Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company
(Representative Corporate Executive Officer)

Co-Head of Wholesale Business Unit

 

Director and Deputy President of SMBC

Head of Wholesale Business Unit

 

April 19811984

  

Joined SumitomoMitsui Bank

 

 

April 2008

2012

  

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 20112014

  

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2013March 2017

  

Director and Managing Executive Officer of the CompanySMBC

 

 

June 2013

Director of the Company

April 20142017

Resigned as Director of the Company

  

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

April 2018

  

April 2015Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

  

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

March 20172019

  

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

  

April 20172019

  

Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

 

    

Director and Deputy President of SMBC (to present)

 

June 2017Toshikazu Yaku
(March 3, 1962)

 

Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Jun Ohta
(February 12, 1958)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Katsunori Tanizaki
(April 12, 1957)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Toshikazu Yaku
(March 3, 1962)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Masahiko Oshima
(September 13, 1960)

Senior Managing(Representative Corporate Executive Officer of the CompanyOfficer)

 

Senior Managing ExecutiveGroup Chief Human Resources Officer, of SMBCor CHRO

 

HeadOfficer in charge of International Business UnitGeneral Affairs Department, Human Resources Department, Quality Management Department and Administrative Services Department

Director and Deputy President of SMBC

 

April 1984

  

Joined MitsuiSumitomo Bank

 

 

April 2012

  

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2014

  

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2016

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

 

March 2017

  

Director and Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2017

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

  

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

June 2017

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

 

April 20182019

Director Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Deputy President of SMBC (to present)

June 2019

Deputy President and Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Name
(Date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Katsunori Tanizaki
(April 12, 1957)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Digital Innovation Officer, or CDIO

Officer in charge of Digital Solution Division and Digital Strategy Department

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1982

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2010

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2013

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

June 2015

Director of the Company

April 2017

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

June 2017

Director Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

April 2019

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

June 2019

  

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

 

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Name

Toru Nakashima
(Date of birth)September 14, 1963)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positionsSee “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

 

Business experienceSee “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Naoki Tamura

Tetsuro Imaeda
(July 9, 1961)May 2, 1962)

 

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

 

Group Chief Compliance Officer,
or CCO Officer in charge of Compliance Department

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

Head of Retail Business Unit

April 1986

  

April 1984

Joined Sumitomo Bank

 

 

April 2012

Co-General Manager of Corporate Risk Management Department of the Company

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

April 2018

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Hiroshi Munemasa
(February 1, 1962)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

Head of Global Markets Business Unit

April 1985

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 20132014

  

Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2015September 2016

  

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

 

 

April 2017

  

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

 

 

June 2017April 2020

  

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

 

   

April 2018Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

May 2020

  

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

 

    

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Fumiharu Kozuka
(December 8, 1961)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Audit Executive, or CAE

Officer in charge of Audit Department

April 1986

Joined Mitsui Bank

April 2015

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

March 2019

Director and Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2019

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2020

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Resigned as Director of SMBC

Masamichi Koike
(October 25, 1963)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Head of Global Markets Business Unit

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1987

Joined Taiyo Kobe Bank

April 2015

Executive Officer of SMBC

July 2017

Executive Officer of the Company

April 2018

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2020

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Name
(Date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Shoji Masuda
(July 22, 1963)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Group Chief Information Officer, or CIO

Officer in charge of IT Planning Department, System Security Planning Department, Data Management Department and Operations Planning Department

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1987

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2014

General Manager of IT Planning Department of the Company

April 2016

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Executive Officer of the Company

April 2018

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

March 2019

Director and Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2019

Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

April 2020

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Ryuji Nishisaki
(September 10, 1961)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Co-Head of Global Business Unit

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1985

Joined Taiyo Kobe Bank

April 2013

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

April 2018

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

April 2019

Senior Managing Executive Officer of the Company

April 2021

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Akihiro Fukutome
(January 1, 1963)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Co-Head of Global Business Unit

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1985

Joined Mitsui Bank

April 2014

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2015

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

December 2017

Resigned as Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

January 2018

Managing Officer of Toyota Motor Corporation

President and Chief Executive Officer of Toyota Financial Services Corporation

March 2021

Retired from Toyota Motor Corporation

Retired from Toyota Financial Services Corporation

April 2021

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Name
(Date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Muneo Kanamaru
(April 9, 1964)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Co-Head of Wholesale Business Unit

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1987

Joined Sumitomo Bank

April 2015

General Manager of Human Resources Department of the Company

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2021

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Teiko Kudo
(May 22, 1964)

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

See “Directors” under this Item 6.A.

Takashi Yamashita
(December 7, 1964)

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company

Head of Retail Business Unit

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 1988

Joined Mitsui Bank

April 2016

General Manager of Consumer Business Planning Department of the Company

Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2017

Executive Officer of the Company

April 2018

Managing Executive Officer of the Company

Managing Executive Officer of SMBC

April 2021

Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer of the Company (to present)

Senior Managing Executive Officer of SMBC (to present)

Familial Relationships

There are no familial relationships between any of the directors and corporate executive officers listed above.

Arrangements and Understandings

There is no arrangement or understanding with any major shareholder, customer, supplier or other party, pursuant to which any of the directors and corporate executive officers listed above were selected as a director or member of corporate executive officers.

6.B.    COMPENSATION

OnThe aggregate amounts of compensation paid by us during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 to our directors and to our corporate executive officers were ¥617 million and ¥1,272 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth the details of individual compensation, disclosed pursuant to the provision of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (“FIEA”) and related ordinance, by SMFG and its subsidiaries in amounts equal to or exceeding ¥100 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

  Compensation 
  Aggregated
amount
  Paid by Monetary compensation  Non-monetary compensation 
  Non-performance
-linked
  Performance-linked  Non-performance
-linked
 

Directors and corporate
executive officers

 Annual salary  Bonus  Stock
compensation

Plan I, PlanII
  Stock
compensation

Plan III
 
  (In millions)(1) 

Takeshi Kunibe

 ¥        170  SMFG ¥102  ¥32  ¥35  ¥—   

Makoto Takashima

 ¥199  SMFG ¥16  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   
  SMBC  103   38   42   —   

Jun Ohta

 ¥191  SMFG ¥110  ¥38  ¥43  ¥—   

Gotaro Michihiro

 ¥101  SMFG ¥29  ¥10  ¥10  ¥—   
  SMBC  30   10   10   —   

Toshikazu Yaku

 ¥101  SMFG ¥29  ¥11  ¥10  ¥—   
  SMBC  29   11   10   —   

Yoshihiko Shimizu

 ¥129  SMFG ¥        12  ¥        —    ¥—    ¥—   
  SMBC Nikko
Securities
  42   64   11           —   

(1)

Amounts less than one million yen have been truncated.

In June 29, 2017, we transitioned from a board of corporate auditors governance system to a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee. The following provides information before and after the transition.

Before the transition, compensation for each individual director and corporate auditor was determined by our board of directors and by consultation among our corporate auditors, respectively, in accordance with our internal rules and our standard practice of approval at our general meeting of shareholders. The shareholders’ approval specified the upper limit of the aggregate amount of compensation or calculation methods. To ensure objectivity in the process of determining such compensation, bonuses and stock options to our board of directors and the board of directors of SMBC, we had voluntarily formed a compensation committee in which an outside director served as the chairman of the committee.

After the transition, the compensation committee is responsible for establishing policy in regard to the determination of compensation of our directors and corporate executive officers. In addition, the committee determines the contents of the compensation of the individual directors and corporate executive officers in accordance with this policy. For more information, see “Item 6.C. Board Practices.”

In July 2017, our compensation committee resolved to revise our executive compensation policy and to introduce new stock compensation plans that utilize restricted stock, while discontinuing the issuance of new stock options. The aggregate amountsplans allot shares of compensation paid by us during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018restricted stock to our directors corporate auditors and(excluding outside directors), corporate executive officers, were ¥586 million, ¥44 million and ¥656 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth the detailsexecutive officers of individual compensation, disclosed pursuant to the provisionSMFG, directors (excluding outside directors) and executive officers, etc. of the FIEASMBC and related ordinance, by SMFG and itsrepresentative corporate executive officers of certain of our subsidiaries, in amounts equalorder to or exceeding ¥100 million during(a) provide more appropriate incentives for executives by strengthening linkages with SMFG’s short-, medium- and long-term performance, and (b) further align the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:interests of executives with those of shareholders, increase the weight of stock compensation, and enhance the shareholding of our executives.

   Compensation 

Director

  Aggregate
amount
   Paid by  Annual salary   Stock
compensation
   Bonus 
   

 

(In millions)(1)

 

Koichi Miyata

  ¥141   SMFG  ¥40   ¥11   ¥19 
    SMBC   40    9    19 

Takeshi Kunibe

  ¥147   SMFG  ¥86   ¥18   ¥39 
    SMBC   —      2    —   

Makoto Takashima

  ¥149   SMFG  ¥10   ¥—     ¥—   
    SMBC   71    28    39 

Jun Ohta

  ¥101   SMFG  ¥61   ¥11   ¥27 
    SMBC   —      0    —   

Tetsuya Kubo

  ¥126   SMFG  ¥14   ¥—     ¥—   
    SMBC Nikko
Securities
   54    —      58 

(1)Amounts less than one million yen have been truncated.

Prior to the revision of our executive compensation policy discussed below,above, we had introduced compensation-type stock options to directors, corporate auditors, and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC (“SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights”), which served as an incentive for them to further contribute to the equity appreciation and achieve better corporate performance through sharing the benefits and risks of the share price performance with our shareholders.

On July 10, 2017, our compensation committee resolved to revise our executive compensation policy and to introduce new stock compensation plans that utilize restricted stock, while discontinuing the issuance of new stock options. The plans allot shares of restricted stock to directors (excluding outside directors), corporate

executive officers, and executive officers of SMFG and directors (excluding outside directors), executive officers and corporate auditors (excluding outside corporate auditors), etc. of SMBC, in order to (a) provide more appropriate incentives for executives by strengthening linkages with SMFG’s short-, medium- and long-term performance, and (b) further align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, increase the weight of stock compensation, and enhance the shareholding of our executives.

For more information about stock option plans and compensation plans utilizing restricted stock and stock option plans, see “Item 6.E. Share Ownership” or Note 3940 “Share-Based Payment” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

6.C.    BOARD PRACTICES

General

The Companies Act permits three types of governance systems for large public companies. The first system is for companies with a board of corporate auditors, and the second one is for companies with an audit and supervisory committee. The last one is for companies with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee.

We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. In order to further enhance our solid corporate governance system, we transitioned to a company with three statutory committees onin June, 29, 2017.

Under the Companies Act, a company with three statutory committees is required to have a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee, each of which consisting of members of the board of directors and of which the majority of the members must be outside directors. In addition to the three statutory committees, we have voluntarily established our risk committee.

“Outside director” means a director of any corporation who satisfies all of the following requirements: (a) a person who is not an executive director, corporate executive officer (shikkoyaku), or an employee, including a manager (“Executive Director, etc.”), and has not been an Executive Director, etc. of such corporation or any of its subsidiaries for the ten years prior to assuming his/her office; (b) if the person has been a director, accounting advisor or corporate auditor of such corporation or any of its subsidiaries (excluding a person who has been an Executive Director, etc.) at any time within the ten years prior to assuming his/her office, a person who has not been an Executive Director, etc. of such corporation or any of its subsidiaries for the ten years prior to assuming his/her office as director, accounting advisor, or corporate auditor; (c) a person who is not a parent corporation or any entity which is prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as a person who controls the management of the corporation (excluding entities who are juridical persons) (“parent corporation, etc.”) of such corporation (limited to a natural person) or director or corporate executive officer (shikkoyaku), or other employee, including a manager, of a parent corporation, etc.; (d) a person who is not an Executive Director, etc. of a subsidiary or any entity which is prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as the juridical person for which management is controlled by the person other than the corporation (“subsidiary, etc.”) of a parent corporation, etc. of such corporation; and (e) a person who is not a spouse or relative within the second degree of kinship of a director or corporate executive officer (shikkoyaku), manager, or other important employee of such corporation, or its parent corporation, etc. (limited to a natural person).

To ensure the compliance of our execution of our business operations with legal regulations and generally accepted practices, the outside directors are selected from among experts (including certified public accountants, lawyers and persons with consulting or business management experience).

Also, under the Companies Act, a company with three statutory committees must have one or more corporate executive officers elected by resolution of the board of directors. Corporate executive officers decide on the execution of the operations of the company that were delegated to them by resolution of the board of directors.

Pursuant to Article 4 of our articles of incorporation, we maintain a corporate governance system consisting of a general meeting of shareholders, individual directors, a board of directors, a nominating committee, an audit committee, a compensation committee, corporate executive officers and an accounting auditor as its primary components.

Board of directors

Our articles of incorporation provide for a board of directors consisting of not fewer than three directors. We currently have seventeenfifteen directors. All directors are elected by our shareholders at a general meeting of shareholders. The term of office of a director expires upon conclusion of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders to be held for the last fiscal year ending within one year after the election of the director. Directors may serve any number of consecutive terms.

By resolution, our board of directors elects or removes corporate executive officers and representative corporate executive officers. Our board of directors may elect directors with titles (yakutsuki-torishimariyaku) and corporate executive officers with titles (yakutsuki-shikkoyaku) and assign or change the designation of the duties of corporate executive officers by resolution. In addition, our board of directors elects or removes members of each statutory committee.

The Companies Act requires the board of directors to decide on the execution of operations of a company, including basic management policy, and supervise the execution of duties by corporate executive officers. In addition, the board of directors may, by resolution of the same, delegate decisions on the execution of the operations to corporate executive officers, to the extent permitted by the Companies Act.

Our board of directors held 10 meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Nominating committee

The nominating committee determines the contents of proposals regarding the election and dismissal of directors to be submitted to a general meeting of shareholders. The committee also deliberates on matters relatingregarding personnel decisions pertaining to officers of the Company and our major subsidiaries and the selection of successors to the appointmentpresidents of our presidentthe Company and president of SMBC.

Under the Companies Act, we are required to have a nominating committee that consists of members of our board of directors, and the majority of the members must be outside directors. Currently, the chairman of the nominating committee is Yoshinobu Tsutsui, who is an outside director. Other outside directors on the nominating committee are Masayuki Matsumoto, Arthur M. Mitchell, Masaharu Kohno and Eriko Sakurai. The other director on the nominating committee is Koichi Miyata,Takeshi Kunibe, the chairman of the board.

Our nominating committee held 4 meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Audit committee

The audit committee is responsible for auditing the execution of duties by corporate executive officers and directors, preparing audit reports and determining the contents of proposals regarding the election or dismissal of, or refusal to reelect, accounting auditors under the Companies Act to be submitted to a general meeting of shareholders. In addition, the committee inspects our operations and assets, and those of our major subsidiaries.

Under the Companies Act, we are required to have an audit committee that consists of members of our board of directors, and the majority of the members must be outside directors. Currently, the chairman of the audit committee is Masayuki Matsumoto, who is an outside director. Other outside directors on the audit committee are Shozo Yamazaki and Katsuyoshi Shinbo. Other directors on the audit committee are Toshiyuki TeramotoAtsuhiko Inoue and Toru Mikami.Toshihiro Isshiki.

Our audit committee held 15 meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Compensation committee

The compensation committee is responsible for establishing policy in regard to the determination of compensation of our directors and corporate executive officers. In addition, the committee determines the

contents of the compensation of the individual directors and corporate executive officers in accordance with this policy. The committee also deliberates on the policies for determining the compensation of directors and officers of our major subsidiaries, and the contents of compensation of individual executive officers of the Company.

Under the Companies Act, we are required to have a compensation committee that consists of members of our board of directors, and the majority of the members must be outside directors. Currently, the chairman of the compensation committee is Katsuyoshi Shinbo, who is an outside director. Other outside directors on the compensation committee are Arthur M. Mitchell, Yoshinobu Tsutsui and Eriko Sakurai. Other directors on the compensation committee are Koichi Miyata,Takeshi Kunibe, the chairman of the board, and Takeshi Kunibe,Jun Ohta, our president.

Our compensation committee held 6 meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Risk committee

In addition to the three statutory committees mentioned above, we have voluntarily established our risk committee. The committee is responsible for on matters relating to environmental and risk committee supervisesawareness, the operation of our risk appetite framework, and reportsthe implementation of risk management systems as well as other important matters pertaining to ourrisk management and reporting to the board of directors on material SMBC Group-wide risk management and compliance issues.these matters.

Corporate executive officers

Under the Companies Act, a company with three statutory committees must have one or more corporate executive officers. We currently have ninefourteen corporate executive officers. All corporate executive officers are elected by our directors at a board of directors meeting. The term of office of a corporate executive officer expires upon conclusion of the first board of directors meeting called after conclusion of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders for the last business year ending within one year from the time of their election. The board of directors shall appoint representative corporate executive officers from among the corporate executive officers.

Our President and Group Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) executes business affairs in accordance with resolutions adopted by the board of directors. Our deputy presidents and corporate executive officers, senior managing corporate executive officers and managing corporate executive officers assist the President and Group CEO in the management of ourday-to-day operations. Our chairman of the board serves as the chairman of and presides over our board of directors. This is done in order to separate the role of our president, whose responsibility is to exercise overall supervision of our business activities and SMBC Group companies, from the role of our chairman.

At the operational level, we have created the Management Committee to act as the top decision-making body with respect to business administration and management supervision of the entire the SMBC Group. The committee composed of one or moreis chaired by the President and Group CEO with other members including our corporate executive officers the president of SMBC, the president of SMBC Nikko Securities and the personother officers designated by ourthe President and Group CEO. The President and Group CEO considers important matters relating to the execution of business in accordance with the basic policies set by the board of directors and based on discussions held by the committee members.

Corporate Governance Practices

For the purpose of protecting the interests of shareholders in general, some Japanese securities exchanges, including the Tokyo Stock Exchange, requires a listed company to have, from amongst its outside directors or

outside corporate auditors, at least one independent director or corporate auditor who does not have conflicting interests with shareholders as specified under the rule. All companies on these securities exchanges are required to report the name of such independent director or corporate auditor, which is disclosed to the public. In addition, the Japan’s Corporate Governance Code (“Corporate Governance Code”) formulated by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, which establishes fundamental principles for effective corporate governance at listed companies in Japan and took effect in June 2015, provides that listed companies should appoint at least two independent directors. The independence standard for such independent directors will be determined by the subject listed company taking into consideration the independence standards of the Japanese stock exchanges. WeIn consideration of the Corporate Governance Code, we also established the SMFG Corporate Governance Guideline in consideration of the content of the Corporate Governance Code and such Corporate Governance Guidelinewhich provides thatone-third or more of the directors, and at least two of them, will be elected as independent outside directors. We designated all seven outside directors as independent directors.

Companies listed on the NYSE, must comply with certain corporate governance standards provided under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. However, NYSE-listed companies that are foreign private issuers, including us, are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A if such foreign private issuers meet certain criteria. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for a summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by NYSE-listed U.S. companies.

Exemption from Liability

Under the Companies Act and our articles of incorporation, we may exempt ournon-executive directors, etc. from liabilities to us arising in connection with their failure to execute their duties, within the limits stipulated by applicable laws and regulations. Pursuant to such authority, we have entered into a liability limitation agreement with each outside director, etc. which limits the maximum amount of their liability to the Company arising in connection with a failure to execute their duties to the greater of either ¥10 million or the minimum liability amount prescribed in applicable laws.

Benefits upon Termination of Employment

Neither we nor our subsidiaries maintain any directors’ service contracts providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

6.D.    EMPLOYEES

At March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, on a consolidated basis, we had approximately 73,000, 77,20086,800, 86,400 and 73,70086,700 employees, respectively, including locally hired staff in our foreign offices but excluding temporary employees. We also had an average of approximately 15,10011,300 temporary employees during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021.

The following tables show our full-time employees at March 31, 20182021 on a consolidated basis under Japanese GAAP broken down based on business segment and geographical location:

 

   Percentage of full-time
employees at
March 31, 20182021
 

Business segment:

  

Wholesale Business Unit

   1311

Retail Business Unit

   4836 

InternationalGlobal Business Unit

   1434 

Global Markets Business Unit

   2 

Head office account and others

   2317 
  

 

 

 

Total

   100
  

 

 

 

 

   Percentage of full-time
employees at
March 31, 20182021
 

Location:

  

Japan

   8766

Americas

   34 

Europe and Middle East

   2 

Asia and Oceania

   828 
  

 

 

 

Total

   100
  

 

 

 

MostMore than half of our employees are members of workers’ unions, which negotiate with management concerning remuneration and working conditions. We consider our labor relations to be good.

We consider our level of remuneration, fringe benefits (including an employee share ownership program), working conditions and other allowances, which includelump-sum payments and annuities to employees upon retirement, to be generally competitive with those offered by other large enterprises in Japan.

6.E.    SHARE OWNERSHIP

Shareholdings by Directors and Senior Management

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock owned by our directors and corporate executive officers at June 28, 2018:29, 2021:

 

   Number of shares owned 

Directors and corporate executive officers:

  

Koichi Miyata

29,651

Takeshi Kunibe

   49,83981,194

Jun Ohta

52,166 

Makoto Takashima

   24,195

Kozo Ogino

17,119

Jun Ohta

18,919

Katsunori Tanizaki

14,675

Toshikazu Yaku

15,849

Toshiyuki Teramoto

8,50056,882 

Toru MikamiNakashima

   1,30025,211 

Tetsuya KuboTeiko Kudo

   7,73126,745

Atsuhiko Inoue

18,676

Toshihiro Isshiki

33,891

Yasuyuki Kawasaki

31,149 

Masayuki Matsumoto

   3002,200 

Arthur M. Mitchell

   1001,100 

Shozo Yamazaki

   1001,100 

Masaharu Kohno

   —   

Yoshinobu Tsutsui

   —   

Katsuyoshi Shinbo

   3002,200 

Eriko Sakurai

   500

Manabu Narita

17,3413,400 

Masahiko Oshima

   16,54932,313 

Naoki TamuraToshikazu Yaku

   9,21731,885 

Hiroshi MunemasaKatsunori Tanizaki

   7,61728,717

Tetsuro Imaeda

29,998

Fumiharu Kozuka

29,680

Masamichi Koike

27,647

Shoji Masuda

27,096

Ryuji Nishisaki

27,919

Akihiro Fukutome

12,704

Muneo Kanamaru

15,583

Takashi Yamashita

16,977 

None of our directors or corporate executive officers is the owner of more than one percent of our common stock, and no director or corporate executive officers has voting rights with respect to our common stock that are different from any other holder of our common stock.

Stock Option Plans and Other Remuneration for Directors and Senior Management

Stock Option Plans

The following table provides an overview of the significant terms and conditions of the SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights, that we issued prior to the revision of our executive compensation policy in July 2017 (discussed below):

 

  

Date of
resolution

 

Number of grantees

 

Shares granted

 

Exercise period

 

Exercise price

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(1st series)

 July 28, 2010 82 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 102,600 shares of common stock of the Company August 13, 2010 to August 12, 2040 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights (2nd
(2nd series)

 July 29, 2011 85 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 268,200 shares of common stock of the Company August 16, 2011 to August 15, 2041 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(3rd series)

 July 30, 2012 85 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 280,500 shares of common stock of the Company August 15, 2012 to August 14, 2042 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(4th series)

 July 29, 2013 82 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 115,700 shares of common stock of the Company August 14, 2013 to August 13, 2043 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(5th series)

 July 30, 2014 82 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 121,900 shares of common stock of the Company August 15, 2014 to August 14, 2044 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(6th series)

 July 31, 2015 83 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 132,400 shares of common stock of the Company August 18, 2015 to August 17, 2045 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

  

Date of
resolution

 

Number of grantees

 

Shares granted

 

Exercise period

 

Exercise price

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights
(7th series)

 July 26, 2016 89 directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC 201,200 shares of common stock of the Company August 15, 2016 to August 14, 2046 ¥1 per share granted upon exercise of each stock acquisition right, multiplied by the number of shares granted

Compensation Plans Utilizing Restricted Stock

OnIn July 10, 2017, our compensation committee resolved to revise our executive compensation policy and to introduce new stock compensation plans that utilize restricted stock, while discontinuing the issuance of new stock options.

The plans consist of Stock Compensation Plan I (“Plan I”), which determines remuneration primarily based on our medium-term performance, Stock Compensation Plan II (“Plan II”), which determines remuneration primarily based on our annual performance and Stock Compensation Plan III (“Plan III”), which determines remuneration primarily based on corporate title.

Plan I (medium-term performance share plan) has an evaluation period of three years, starting from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, corresponding with the our medium-term management plan. Executives are initially allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent to the monetary amount determined based on the executive’s corporate title. After the completion of the evaluation period, our compensation committee will reviewreviews the progress of our medium-term management plan, performance of our common stock, and results of customer satisfaction surveys and other factors, to determine a final amount to be released from transfer restrictions. In case the final amount falls below the initial amount, we will retrieve all or part of the allotted shares at no cost.

Under Plan II (annual performance share plan), executives are allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent to a certain portion of the monetary amount determined based on the annual performance of SMFG and SMBC, as well as on the individual performance of the executives reviewed both from short-term and medium-to-long-term perspectives. The remainder will beis paid to the executives as a cash bonus. Transfer restrictions on these shares are released evenly over the three-year period following the year of allotment.

Under Plan III (promotion reward plan), executives are allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent topre-determined compensation amounts per title, reflecting the increased responsibilities derived from promotions. Restrictions shall apply to the shares until the earlier of 30 years from allotment or when the executive retires from office.

The eligible executives for the plans are directors (excluding outside directors), corporate executive officers and executive officers of SMFG, and directors (excluding outside directors), and executive officers and corporate auditors (excluding outside corporate auditors), etc. of SMBC who are designated by the SMFG compensation committee or by SMBC and residing and serving in Japan. However, membersrepresentative corporate executive officers of the SMFG audit committee and SMBC corporate auditors will only be eligible for Plan III.certain of our subsidiaries.

The allotment agreements that we enter into with executives under the plans restrict disposal of the allotted shares in any manner, including transfers of ownership or granting of security interest and, also provide that we may retrieve all or part of the allotted shares at no cost in case the our compensation committee reaches certain decisions such as thenon-achievement of financial targets. The agreements also include provisions for forfeiture and claw-back of vested stock in order to restrain excessive risk-taking and foster a prudent risk culture expected of a financial institution.

On July 10, 2017, our President and Group CEO, as delegated by our board of directors, determined the issuance of restricted stock to be allotted pursuant to the plans. The following table provides details of the issuance and allotment of the new shares:shares under our stock compensation plans:

 

Date of issue

  

Issue price

  

Class and total number of

shares issued

  

Allottees and number of

shares to be allotted

July 26, 2017

  ¥4,372 per share  387,765 shares of common stock of the Company  

SMFG directors:Directors of SMFG: 7 persons 36,278 shares

 

SMFG corporateCorporate executive officers:officers of SMFG: 4 persons 12,863 shares

 

SMFG executive officers:Executive officers of SMFG: 27 persons 47,077 shares

 

SMBC directors:Directors of SMBC: 10 persons 71,703 shares

 

SMBC executiveExecutive officers, etc.: of SMBC: 59 persons 219,844 shares

August 3, 2018

¥4,287 per share326,330 shares of common stock of the Company

Directors of SMFG : 6 persons 8,388 shares

Corporate executive officers of SMFG: 5 persons 3,852 shares

Executive officers of SMFG: 42 persons 25,544 shares

Directors of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 16 persons 35,289 shares

Executive officers, etc. of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 85 persons 253,257 shares

July 29, 2019

¥3,828 per share272,536 shares of common stock of the Company

Directors of SMFG: 7 persons 9,926 shares

Corporate executive officers of SMFG: 6 persons 4,191 shares

Executive officers of SMFG: 37 persons 27,419 shares

Directors of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 14 persons 25,879 shares

Executive officers, etc. of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 91 persons 205,121 shares

Date of issue

Issue price

Class and total number of

shares issued

Allottees and number of

shares to be allotted

July 27, 2020

¥3,015 per share868,505 shares of common stock of the Company

Directors of SMFG: 6 persons 64,842 shares

Corporate executive officers of SMFG: 13 persons 60,638 shares

Executive officers of SMFG: 45 persons 112,719 shares

Directors of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 16 persons 150,598 shares

Executive officers, etc. of SMFG’s subsidiaries: 91 persons 479,708 shares

Employee Stock Ownership Associations

We have employee stock ownership associations in Japan for our and our subsidiaries’ employees. Members of the employee stock ownership associations set aside certain amounts from their monthly salary to purchase our common stock through the relevant employee stock ownership association. The administrator of each association makes open-market purchases of our common stock for the account of the association on a monthly basis. We and our subsidiaries contribute matching funds equivalent to 5% of the amount purchased by the relevant association. At March 31, 2018,2021, none of the employee stock ownership associations held more than 1% of our common stock.

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

7.A.    MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

Major Shareholders

Our major shareholders, appearing on our register of common shareholders at March 31, 2018,2021, were as follows:

 

   Number of
shares held(2)
   Percentage
of shares
issued(1)(2)
 

Name:

    

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account)

   82,563,000    5.85

The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account)

   72,716,900    5.15

NATSCUMCO

   39,842,032    2.82

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account 9)

   30,932,300    2.19

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account 5)

   28,529,200    2.02

STATE STREET BANK WEST CLIENT—TREATY 505234

   24,748,158    1.75

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account 1)

   21,209,100    1.50

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account 2)

   20,939,400    1.48

Barclays Securities Japan Limited

   18,477,000    1.30

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (Trust Account 7)

   18,442,300    1.30
   Number of
shares held(2)
   Percentage
of shares
issued(1)(2)
 

Name:

    

The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account)

   121,954,600    8.89

Custody Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account)

   77,061,400    5.62

Custody Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account 7)

   28,014,500    2.04

NATSCUMCO

   27,337,632    1.99

SSBTC CLIENT OMNIBUS ACCOUNT.

   25,919,586    1.89

STATE STREET BANK WEST CLIENT—TREATY 505234

   21,261,727    1.55

Custody Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account 5)

   20,920,300    1.52

Custody Bank of Japan, Ltd. (Trust Account 6).

   18,551,800    1.35

Barclays Securities Japan Limited

   18,549,300    1.35

JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd.

   16,849,837    1.22

 

(1)

Percentages are calculated based on the total number of shares of common stock then issued, excluding our treasury stock, and have been truncated to the nearest second decimal point.

(2)

On January 29, 2018,February 1, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. submittedfiled a Schedule 13G towith the SEC, indicating that BlackRock, Inc. and its subsidiaries beneficially held 102,228,72884,465,707 shares of our common stock, representing 7.2%6.15% of our outstanding common stock at December 31, 2017.2020. On February 8, 2018,5, 2021, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc. submittedfiled a Schedule 13G towith the SEC, indicating that Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries beneficially held 70,946,70083,503,700 shares of our common stock, representing 5.0%6.08% of our outstanding common stock at December 31, 2017. However, we have not confirmed2020. On July 22, 2020, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. submitted a filing to the statusKanto Local Finance Bureau indicating that Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. and its affiliate held 71,289,221 shares of anyour common stock, representing 5.19% of these shareholdingsour outstanding common stock at July 15, 2020. On April 5, 2021, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. submitted a filing to the Kanto Local Finance Bureau indicating that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. and its affiliate held 68,950,200 shares of our common stock, representing 5.02% of our outstanding common stock at March 31, 2018.29, 2021.

Our major shareholders do not have different voting rights.

Shareholders in the United States

Because some of our common stock was held by brokers or other nominees, the number of shares held by and the number of beneficiary holders with addresses in the United States is not fully ascertainable. At March 31, 2018,2021, there were 244247 record holders of our common stock with addresses in the United States, whose shareholdings represented approximately 21%17% of our outstanding common stock on that date.

Control of the Company

To our knowledge, we are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by any another corporation(s), by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person(s), severally or jointly.

Arrangements for Change in Control of the Company

We know of no arrangements the operation of which may at a later time result in a change of control.

7.B.    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We and our banking subsidiaries had, and expect to have in the future, banking transactions and other transactions in the ordinary course of business with our related parties. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, 2021,

such transactions included, but were not limited to, loans, deposits and guarantees. Furthermore, such transactions were immaterial and were made at prevailing market rates, terms and conditions, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, none of our directors or corporate executive officers, or corporate auditors, and none of the close members of their respective families, had any transactions that were material or any transactions that were unusual in their nature or conditions, involving goods, services or tangible or intangible assets, to which we were a party, and no such transactions were proposed at March 31, 2018.2021. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, we made no loans to our directors or corporate executive officers or corporate auditors other than those that were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

7.C.    INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Not applicable.

 

Item 8.

Financial Information

8.A.    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Financial Statements

All relevant financial statements are attached hereto. See “Item 18. Financial Statements.” See “Item 5.A. Operating Results—Reconciliation with Japanese GAAP” for a reconciliation of consolidated net profit and total equity for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 under IFRS, with those amounts under Japanese GAAP.

Export Sales

Not applicable.

Legal Proceedings

We are party to routine litigation incidental to our business, none of which is currently expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that an adverse decision in one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect.

Dividend Policy and Dividends

The declaration, payment and determination of anyyear-end dividend are subject to the approval of shareholders of our common stock at our general meeting of shareholders and to statutory restrictions. The declaration, payment and determination of the amount of any interim dividend require a resolution of our board of directors and are subject to statutory restrictions. Dividend payments are made to shareholders or pledgees of record at the record dates for each payment. March 31 is the record date foryear-end dividends and September 30 is the record date for interim dividends. The payment ofyear-end and interim dividends on common stock is subject to prior payment of dividends on our preferred stock, if any.

We have a basic policy of enhancing shareholder value in a sustainable manner by balancing financial soundness, return to shareholders, and investment for growth. We adopt a progressive dividend policy, which does not reduce dividends and at least maintains or increases dividends each year, supported by our sustainable earnings growth, and seek to achieve a dividend payout ratio of 40% on a consolidated net profit basis under Japanese GAAP duringby the periodend of the nextcurrent medium-term management plan.

The following table shows historical aggregate dividend payments per share of our common stock for each of the fiscal years from the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162019 through the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

 

   Dividend per share 
   Paid(1)   Declared(2) 

Fiscal year ended March 31,

    

2016

  ¥150   ¥155 

2017

   150    150 

2018

   170    155 
   Dividend per share 
   Paid(1)   Declared(2) 

Fiscal year ended March 31,

    

2019

  ¥180   ¥175 

2020

   190    185 

2021

   190    195 

 

(1)

Dividend per share based on dividends in respect of each fiscal year including dividends proposed after current fiscalyear-end but not recognized in the financial statements and excluding dividends in respect of the previous fiscal year declared in current fiscal year.

(2)

Dividend per share based on dividends declared and recognized in the financial statements during each fiscal year.

8.B.    SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Except as otherwise described in this annual report, no significant change in our financial position has occurred since the date of the financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

 

Item 9.

The Offer and Listing

9.A.    OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

Offering Details

Not applicable.

Price History of the Shares

Market Price InformationTrading Markets for Our American Depositary Shares

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low trading prices, and average daily trading volume for our ADSs on the NYSE since the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014.

   Price per ADS   Average daily
trading volume
 
   High     Low     
   (In dollars)   (Number of
shares)
 

Fiscal year ended March 31, except quarter and month data:

      

2014

  $10.59   $  7.32    1,600,359 

2015

   8.83    6.74    1,760,924 

2016

   9.28    5.01    2,218,760 

2017:

      

First quarter

   6.88    5.51    1,773,474 

Second quarter

   7.33    5.43    1,090,648 

Third quarter

   8.30    6.39    963,498 

Fourth quarter

   8.09    7.21    875,551 

Full year

   8.30    5.43    1,179,005 

2018:

      

First quarter

   7.92    6.93    1,930,520 

Second quarter

   7.98    7.33    980,554 

Third quarter

   8.86    7.64    927,306 

Fourth quarter

   9.67    8.33    1,389,541 

Full year

   9.67    6.93    1,306,320 

Most recent six months:

      

December

   8.86    8.08    856,752 

January

   9.67    8.69    1,180,933 

February

   9.35    8.56    1,440,803 

March

   8.77    8.33    1,551,769 

April

   8.66    8.13    854,574 

May

   8.65    8.15    1,304,442 

June (through June 15, 2018)

   8.49    8.14    767,975 

Market Price Information for Our Shares

See “Item 9.C. Markets” for information on the stock exchanges on which our common stock is listed.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low trading prices, and average daily trading volume for our common stock since the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

   Price per shares   Average daily
trading volume
 
   High   Low   
   (In yen)
   (Number of
shares)
 

Fiscal year ended March 31, except quarter and month data:

      

2014

  ¥    5,470   ¥    3,545    9,052,026 

2015

   4,915    3,800    7,609,582 

2016

   5,770    2,820    9,245,903 

2017:

      

First quarter

   3,895    2,792    9,404,657 

Second quarter

   3,805    2,767    10,467,334 

Third quarter

   4,768    3,293    10,275,844 

Fourth quarter

   4,634    4,045    7,194,184 

Full year

   4,768    2,767    9,340,124 

2018:

      

First quarter

   4,448    3,760    7,140,268 

Second quarter

   4,450    3,973    5,975,613 

Third quarter

   5,009    4,278    7,787,789 

Fourth quarter

   5,333    4,375    7,639,756 

Full year

   5,333    3,760    7,129,686 

Most recent six months:

      

December

   5,009    4,541    8,780,181 

January

   5,333    4,878    8,452,326 

February

   5,139    4,642    8,299,626 

March

   4,642    4,375    6,307,548 

April

   4,711    4,338    6,487,225 

May

   4,807    4,413    6,187,924 

June (through June 15, 2018)

   4,665    4,461    5,563,336 

9.B.    PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Not applicable.

9.C.    MARKETS

The primary trading market for our common stock is the Tokyo Stock Exchange (First Section), and our common stock is also listed on the Nagoya Stock Exchange (First Section). Our common stock is quoted under the Securities Code “8316.” Our common stock is not listed on any stock exchange outside of Japan.

Our ADSs have been listed on the NYSE since November 1, 2010 and are quoted under the ticker symbol “SMFG.”

9.D.    SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

Not applicable.

9.E.    DILUTION

Not applicable.

9.F.    EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE

Not applicable.

Item 10.

Additional Information

10.A.    SHARE CAPITAL

Not applicable.

10.B.    MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

Set out below is information concerning our share capital, including a summary of provisions of our articles of incorporation and share handling regulations and of the Companies Act relating to joint stock corporations (kabushiki-kaisha) and related legislation, each as currently in effect.

Register and Entry, Objects and Purposes of the Company

The Company is a joint stock corporation (kabushiki-kaisha) incorporated in Japan under the Companies Act (kaishaho) of Japan. It is registered in the commercial register (shogyo-tokibo) maintained by the Chiyoda Branch Office of the Tokyo Bureau of Legal Affairs.

Article 2 of our articles of incorporation provides that our purpose is to engage in the following business activities:

 

management of banks and other corporations which are permitted to become, or to be established as, subsidiaries under the Banking Act and any business incidental thereto; and

 

in addition to the businesses provided in the foregoing item, any business in which a bank holding company is permitted to engage under the Banking Act.

Provisions Relating to Directors

We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. In order to further enhance our solid corporate governance system, we transitioned tohave adopted a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee, on June 29, 2017.committees system of corporate governance. The Companies Act requires the board of directors to decide on the execution of operations of a company, including basic management policy, and supervise the execution of duties by corporate executive officers. In addition, the board of directors may delegate decisions on the execution of the operations to corporate executive officers, to the extent permitted by the Companies Act. The Companies Act and our articles of incorporation, bylaws and associated internal rules issued pursuant to the articles provide in summary as follows:

 

a director is not entitled to vote on a proposal or arrangement or contract in which the director has a special interest;

 

the amount of compensation to each of our directors is determined by the compensation committee, which consists of members of our board of directors, the majority of whom must be outside directors;

 

the board of directors has authority to approve transactions between the directors and us;

 

there are no provisions requiring the mandatory retirement of directors at a specified age; and

 

share ownership is not required in order to be eligible to serve as a director.

Rights, Preferences and Restrictions of the Shares

A joint stock corporation is a legal entity incorporated under the Companies Act. The rights of shareholders of a joint stock corporation are represented by shares of stock in the corporation, and shareholders’ liability is limited to the amount of the subscription for the shares.

We may issue shares within our authorized but unissued share capital following a resolution by our board of directors. An increase in our authorized share capital requires an amendment of our articles of incorporation, which generally requires approval of our common and preferred shareholders, if any.

Common Stock

General

On January 5, 2009, a central clearing system of shares of Japanese listed companies was enacted underUnder the Act Concerning Book-Entry Transfer of Corporate Bonds, Shares and Other Securities (“Book-Entry Transfer Act”) and, the shares of all Japanese companies listed on any Japanese stock exchange, including our shares, becameare subject to thisa central clearing system and all share certificates of companies thenshares of Japanese listed in Japan became null and void on the effective date of the Book-Entry Transfer Act.companies.

Under the clearing system, a person must have an account at an account managing institution or at Japan Securities Depository Center, Inc. (“JASDEC”) in order to purchase, hold, sell or otherwise dispose of listed shares. Account managing institutions include financial instruments traders (i.e., securities companies), banks, trust companies and certain other financial institutions which meet the requirements prescribed by the Book-Entry Transfer Act, and only those financial institutions that meet further stringent requirements of the Book-Entry Transfer Act can open accounts directly at JASDEC. Under the Book-Entry Transfer Act, any transfer of shares is effected through book entry, and title to the shares passes to the transferee at the time when the transferred number of the shares is recorded in the transferee’s account at an account managing institution. The holder of an account at an account managing institution is presumed to be the legal owner of the shares held in such account.

Under the Companies Act and the Book-Entry Transfer Act, in order to assert shareholders’ rights against us, a shareholder’s name and address must be registered in our register of shareholders, except in limited circumstances. Under the clearing system, such registration is made upon our receipt of the necessary information from JASDEC. Nonresidents of Japan ornon-Japanese corporations without a permanent establishment in Japan (“Nonresident Shareholders”) are required to appoint a standing proxy in Japan or provide a mailing address in Japan. Each Nonresident Shareholder must give notice of a standing proxy or a mailing address to the relevant account managing institution. That notice will be forwarded to us through JASDEC. Japanese securities companies and commercial banks customarily act as standing proxies and provide related services for standard fees. Notices from us to Nonresident Shareholders are delivered to standing proxies or their mailing addresses in Japan.

Our transfer agent is Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Limited.

Distributions of Surplus

As a holding company, we expect that most of our cash flow will come from dividends that SMBC pays us. Under some circumstances, various statutory or contractual provisions may restrict the dividends SMBC can pay us. For example, if SMBC does not have sufficient distributable amounts, it will be unable to pay dividends and we, in turn, may be unable to pay dividends on shares of our common stock. Therefore, our ability to pay dividends mainly depends on the financial performance of our principal operating subsidiary, SMBC.

Under the Companies Act, distribution of cash or other assets by a joint stock corporation to its shareholders, including dividends, takes the form of distributions of surplus (as described in “—Restriction on Distributions of Surplus”). We are permitted to make distributions of surplus to our shareholders any number of times per fiscal year, subject to limitations described in “—Restriction on Distributions of Surplus.” Distributions of surplus are required in principle to be authorized by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders. Distributions of surplus are, however, permitted pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors if:

 

 (1)

our articles of incorporation so provide (our current articles of incorporation do not have a provision to that effect);

 (2)

the normal term of office of our directors is no longer than one year (our current articles of incorporation provide that the normal term of office of our directors expires upon the close of the general meeting of shareholders to be held for the last fiscal year ending within one year after the election); and

 (3)

our nonconsolidated annual financial statements and certain documents for the latest fiscal year fairly present our assets and profit or loss, as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

In an exception to the above rule, even if the requirements described in (1) through (3) are not met, we are permitted to make distributions of surplus in cash to our shareholders by resolutions of the board of directors once per fiscal year if our articles of incorporation so provide. Our current articles of incorporation provide for distributions of surplus as interim dividends, the record date for which is September 30 of each year.

Distributions of surplus may be made in cash or in kind in proportion to the number of shares of common stock held by each shareholder. A resolution of a general meeting of shareholders or by the board of directors authorizing a distribution of surplus must specify the kind and aggregate book value of assets to be distributed, the manner of allocation of the assets to shareholders, and the effective date of the distribution. If a distribution of surplus is to be made in kind, we may, pursuant to a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders or by the board of directors, grant the right to our shareholders to require us to make the distribution in cash instead of in kind. If that right is not granted to shareholders, then the relevant distribution of surplus must be approved by a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.

Under our articles of incorporation, the record dates for annual dividends and interim dividends are March 31 and September 30, respectively, in each year. In Japan, bothex-dividendex-dividend” date”date (the date from which purchasers at shares through Japanese stock exchanges will not be entitled to the dividends to be paid to registered shareholders as any record date) and the record date for dividends precede the date of determination of the amount of the dividend to be paid. Theex-dividend date of the shares of common stock is generally the thirdfirst business day prior to the record date. Under our articles of incorporation, we are not obligated to pay any distributions of surplus to be made in cash which have not been received after five years from the commencement date of those distributions.

Restriction on Distributions of Surplus

Payment of dividends on shares of common stock is also subject to the prior payment of dividends on shares of preferred stock, if any. In the event we pay an interim dividend on shares of our common stock, the interim dividend payment is also subject to the prior payment of interim dividends on the shares of preferred stock, if any.

When we make a distribution of surplus, we must set aside in our capital reserve or retained earnings reserve an amount equal toone-tenth of the amount of surplus so distributed as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

The amount of surplus at any given time must be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

A + B + C + D – (E + F + G)

In the above formula:

 

“A”

  =  the total amount of other capital surplus and other retained earnings, each being the amount that appears on our nonconsolidated balance sheet as of the end of the last fiscal year;

“B”

  =  if we have disposed of treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount of the consideration for that treasury stock received by us less the book value thereof;

“C”

  =  if we have reduced our stated capital after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount of that reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to capital reserve or retained earnings reserve, if any:

“D”

  =  if we have reduced our capital reserve or retained earnings reserve after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount of that reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to stated capital, if any:

“E”

  =  if we have cancelled treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year, the book value of that treasury stock;

��F”

  =  if we have distributed surplus to our shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year, the total book value of the surplus so distributed; and

“G”

  =  other amounts set forth in an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, including:

 

if we have reduced surplus and increased our stated capital, capital reserve or retained earnings reserve after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount of that reduction; and

 

if we have distributed surplus to shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount set aside in our capital reserve or retained earnings reserve, if any, as required by ordinances of the Ministry of Justice.

The aggregate book value of surplus distributed by us may not exceed a prescribed distributable amount as calculated on the effective date of the distribution. Our prescribed distributable amount at any given time shall be the amount of surplus less the aggregate of (a) the book value of our treasury stock, (b) the amount of consideration for any treasury stock we disposed of after the end of the last fiscal year, (c) the sum of net unrealized losses on other securities and unrealized losses on land valuation, and (d) other amounts set forth in an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, including (if the sum ofone-half of our goodwill and deferred assets exceeds the total of the stated capital, capital reserve and retained earnings reserve, each being the amount in our nonconsolidated balance sheet at the end of the last fiscal year) all or a certain part of the exceeding amount as calculated in accordance with the ordinances of the Ministry of Justice. If we have prepared interim financial statements in accordance with the ordinances of the Ministry of Justice as described below, and if the interim financial statements have been approved by the board of directors or (if so required) by a general meeting of shareholders, then the prescribed distributable amount must be adjusted to take into account the amount of profit or loss, and the amount of consideration for any of our treasury stock disposed of by us, during the period for which the interim financial statements have been prepared. We will be permitted to prepare nonconsolidated interim financial statements consisting of a balance sheet at any date subsequent to the end of the last fiscal year and an income statement for the period from the first day of the current fiscal year to the date of the balance sheet. Interim financial statements so prepared by us must be audited by our audit committee and accounting auditors, as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

Voting Rights

Holders of shares of common stock have one voting right for each unit of shares held by them. Except as otherwise provided by law or by our articles of incorporation, a resolution can be adopted at a general meeting of shareholders by the holder of a majority of the total number of the voting rights represented at the meeting. In our articles of incorporation the quorum to elect directors isone-third of the total number of voting rights. Our shareholders are not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors. Our shareholders may cast their

votes by mail or via the internet. Our shareholders may also exercise their voting rights through proxies, provided that the proxies are also holders of shares with voting rights.

The Companies Act provides that certain important matters shall be approved by a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders. Under our articles of incorporation, the quorum for a special resolution isone-third of the total number of voting rights and the approval of at leasttwo-thirds of the voting rights represented at the meeting is required for adopting a special resolution. Important matters include:

 

amending the articles of incorporation (except for amendments that may be authorized by the board of directors under the Companies Act);

 

reducing stated capital which meets certain requirements, with some exceptions;

 

dissolving, merging or consolidating requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

  

establishing a parent and a wholly owned subsidiary relationship by way of a share transfer (kabushiki-iten) or share exchange (kabushiki-kokan), or establishing of a parent and subsidiary relationship by way of a partial share exchange (kabushiki-kofu), requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

transferring the whole or a substantial part of our business;

 

transferring all or part of the shares of a subsidiary which meets certain requirements;

 

taking over the whole business of another company requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

corporate split requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

consolidating shares of common stock;

 

acquiring shares of common stock from a specific shareholder other than one of our subsidiaries;

 

issuing or transferring new shares or existing shares held by us as treasury stock to persons other than the shareholders at a specially favorable price;

 

issuing stock acquisition rights (including those incorporated in bonds with stock acquisition rights) to persons other than the shareholders under specially favorable conditions;

 

exempting some liability of a director or corporate executive officer; and

 

distributing surplusin-kind if shareholders are not granted the right to require us to make a distribution in cash instead ofin-kind.

Capital and Reserves

When we issue new shares, the amount of the cash or assets paid or contributed by subscribers for new shares (with some exceptions) is required to be accounted for as stated capital, although we may account for an amount not exceedingone-half of the cash or assets as capital reserve by resolutions of the board of directors.

We may reduce our capital reserve or retained earnings reserve generally by resolution of a general meeting of shareholders. We may account for the whole or any part of the reduction as stated capital if we so decide by the same resolution. On the other hand, we may reduce our stated capital generally by special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders and may account for the whole or any part of the reduction as capital reserve if we so decide by the same resolution. We may reduce our surplus and increase either (1) stated capital or (2) capital reserve and/or retained earnings reserve by the same amount, in either case by resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.

Stock Splits

We may at any time split our outstanding shares of common stock into a greater number of shares of common stock by resolution of the board of directors. When a stock split is to be made, so long as our only class

of outstanding stock is the common stock, we may increase the number of authorized shares in the same ratio as that of the stock split by amending our articles of incorporation. We may effect such an amendment by resolution of the board of directors without shareholder approval.

We must give public notice of a stock split, specifying the record date therefore, not less than two weeks prior to the record date.

Unit Share System

We have a unit share system, under which 100 shares of our common stock constitute one unit. Under the unit share system, shareholders have one voting right for each unit of shares held by them at a general meeting of shareholders, and shares constituting a fractional unit carry no voting rights. Under our articles of incorporation, the holders of shares constituting a fractional unit do not have shareholder rights except for those specified in the Companies Act or an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, which include the rights (1) to receive dividends, (2) to receive cash or other assets in case of consolidation or split of shares, share exchange or share transfer, or merger, or (3) to be allotted rights to subscribe for free new shares and stock acquisition rights when those rights are granted to shareholders. We may cease to use the unit share system by amendment to the articles of incorporation without shareholders’ approval even though amendments to the articles of incorporation generally require a special resolution of the general meeting of shareholders.

A holder of shares of our common stock constituting less than one unit may at any time request us to purchase those shares. In addition, a holder of shares of our common stock constituting less than one unit may at any time request us to sell to it the number of shares necessary to raise its share ownership to a whole unit. Under the clearing system operated by JASDEC, such request must be made through the financial institution where the shareholder has opened its account.

The price at which shares of our common stock constituting less than one unit will be purchased or sold by us pursuant to such request will be equal to either (a) the closing price of shares of our common stock reported by the Tokyo Stock Exchange on the day when such request is received by our transfer agent, or (b) if no sale takes place on the Tokyo Stock Exchange on that day, the price at which sale of such shares is executed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange immediately thereafter. Pursuant to our share handling regulations, an amount equal to the applicable brokerage commission will be deducted from the price so determined.

Under the new clearing system, shares constituting less than one unit are transferable. Under the rules of the Japanese stock exchanges, however, shares constituting less than one unit do not comprise a trading unit, except in limited circumstances, and accordingly, may not be sold on the Japanese stock exchanges.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of our liquidation, the assets remaining after payment of all debts, liquidation expenses, taxes and required distribution payments to preferred shareholders, if any, will be distributed among shareholders of common stock in proportion to the respective number of shares which they hold. For liquidation preference for residual assets to the holders of preferred stock, see “—Preferred Stock—Liquidation Rights.”

Redemption Provisions and Sinking Fund Provisions

Our common stock has no redemption provisions or sinking fund provisions.

Liability to Further Calls or Assessments

Our shares of common stock outstanding, including shares represented by the ADSs, are fully paid and nonassessable.

Legal Restrictions on Acquisitions of Shares

The FIEA and its related regulations require any person who has become solely or jointly a beneficial holder of more than 5% of the total issued shares of capital stock of a company listed on any Japanese stock exchange, to file with the director of an appropriate local finance bureau of the Ministry of Finance within five business

days a report concerning the shareholdings. With some exceptions, a similar report must also be filed in respect of any subsequent change of 1% or more in those holdings or any change in material matters set out in reports previously filed. For this purpose, shares issuable to a holder upon conversion of convertible securities or exercise of share subscription warrants or stock acquisition rights are taken into account in determining both the number of shares held by such holder and the issuer’s total issued share capital. Copies of each report must also be furnished to all the Japanese stock exchanges on which the shares are listed.

Under the Banking Act, a person who desires to hold 20% (in some exceptional cases, 15%) or more of the voting rights of a bank is required to obtain advance approval of the FSA Commissioner. In addition, any person who becomes a holder of more than 5% of the voting rights of a bank holding company or a bank must report the ownership of the voting rights to the director of an appropriate local finance bureau within five business days. This requirement is separate from the significant shareholdings report required under the FIEA. See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations for Stabilizing the Financial System—Examination and Reporting Applicable to Shareholders of a Bank.”

Subscription Rights

Holders of shares of our common stock have no preemptive rights. Authorized but unissued shares of common stock may be issued at the times, and upon the terms the board of directors determines, subject to the limitations as to the issuance of new shares of common stock at a specially favorable price mentioned in “—Voting Rights” above. The board of directors may, however, determine that the holders of shares of common stock be given subscription rights to new shares of common stock, in which case they must be given on uniform terms to all holders of shares of common stock at a record date of which not less than two weeks’ prior public notice must be given. Each of the shareholders to whom subscription rights is given must also be given at least two weeks’ prior notice of the date on which the rights expire.

Stock Acquisition Rights

We may issue stock acquisition rights (shinkabu-yoyakuken). Holders of stock acquisition rights are entitled to acquire shares from us upon payment of the applicable exercise price and subject to other terms and conditions thereof. We may also issue bonds with stock acquisition rights (shinkabu-yoyakuken-tsuki-shasai). The issuance of stock acquisition rights and bonds with stock acquisition rights may be authorized by the board of directors unless it is made under specially favorable conditions, as described in “—Voting Rights.”

Record Date

March 31 is the record date for the payment ofyear-end dividends and the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders. September 30 is the record date for payment of interim dividends. In addition, by determination by corporate executive officers under the authority delegated by the board of directors and after giving at least two weeks’ prior public notice, we may at any time set a record date in order to determine the shareholders who are entitled to certain rights pertaining to the common stock.

Under the Book-Entry Transfer Act, we are required to give notice of each record date to JASDEC at least two weeks prior to such record date. JASDEC is required to give us notice of the names and addresses of our shareholders, the numbers of shares held by them, and other relevant information at a record date promptly after we set it.

Our Acquisition of Our Own Shares of Common Stock

We may acquire shares of our common stock (1) by way of purchase on any Japanese stock exchange on which shares of our common stock are listed, or by way of tender offer (in either case, pursuant to an ordinary resolution of a general meeting of shareholders or a resolution of the board of directors), (2) from a specific

shareholder other than any of our subsidiaries (pursuant to a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders), or (3) from any of our subsidiaries (pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors). In the case of (2) above, any other shareholder may make a request to a director, at least five days prior to the relevant general meeting of shareholders, to include the shareholder as a seller in the proposed purchase. However, that right is not available if the purchase price or any other consideration to be received by the relevant specific shareholder does not exceed the then market price of the shares to be purchased from the shareholder.

The total amount of the purchase price of shares of common stock may not exceed the prescribed distributable amount, as described in “—Common Stock—Restriction on Distributions of Surplus.”

We may hold the shares of common stock acquired, and may generally dispose of or cancel those shares by resolution of the board of directors.

Disposal of Shares of Our Common Stock Held by Shareholders Whose Location Is Unknown

We are not required to send notices to a shareholder if notices have failed to arrive for five consecutive years or more at his or her address in our register of shareholders unless we are notified of a new address. If the shareholder also fails to receive distributions of surplus on the shares for five or more consecutive years at his or her address in our register of shareholders or otherwise as specified, then we may in general dispose of those shares at their then-market price and hold or deposit the proceeds of that disposal on behalf of that shareholder.

Preferred Stock

The following is a summary of information concerning provisions of our articles of incorporation.

General

At the date of this annual report, under our articles of incorporation, we are authorized to issue 167,000 shares of Type 5 preferred stock, 167,000 shares of Type 7 preferred stock, 115,000 shares of Type 8 preferred stock and 115,000 shares of Type 9 preferred stock. In June 2013, our articles of incorporation were amended to delete the provisions regarding Type 6 preferred stock, as these provisions have become unnecessary.

In March 2005, we issued 70,001 shares of our 1st series Type 6 preferred stock for an aggregate issue price of ¥210 billion. The Type 6 preferred stock was allocated using a third-party allocation of shares at a price of ¥3,000,000 per share, ¥1,500,000 of which was accounted for as stated capital. Sumitomo Life Insurance Company acquired 23,334 shares, Nippon Life Insurance Company acquired 20,000 shares, Mitsui Life Insurance Company, Limited, which was renamed Taiju Life Insurance Company Limited on April 1, 2019, acquired 16,667 shares and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company, Limited acquired 10,000 shares. On April 1, 2011, we acquired and cancelled all of the outstanding 1st series Type 6 preferred stock.

At the date of this annual report, we have no preferred stock outstanding. The following is a summary of the relevant provisions of our articles of incorporation regarding preferred stock.

Preferred Dividends

Our articles of incorporation provide that, if we pay dividends, we must pay cash dividends to holders of shares of our preferred stock in preference to the holders of our common stock. If preferred interim dividends stipulated in our articles of incorporation were paid during the relevant fiscal year, the amount of the preferred interim dividends shall be subtracted from the amount of annual preferred dividends.

Our failure to declare annual preferred dividends in full in respect of any fiscal year on a series of preferred stock gives the holders of that preferred stock certain voting rights.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, holders of our preferred stock will be entitled, equally in rank as among themselves and in preference over shares of our common stock, to receive out of our residual assets upon liquidation a distribution of ¥3,000,000 per share.

Preferred stockholders are not entitled to any further dividends or other participation or distribution of our residual assets upon our liquidation.

Voting Rights

Our articles of incorporation provide that holders of preferred stock are only entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, a general meeting of shareholders;

 

from the commencement of our ordinary general meeting of shareholders if an agenda for approval to declare a preferred dividend is not submitted to the meeting; or

 

from the close of our ordinary general meeting of shareholders if a proposed resolution to declare a preferred dividend is not approved at the meeting.

In both cases, these rights of our preferred stockholders lapse when a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders declaring a preferred dividend is approved.

The Companies Act provides that a separate resolution of a meeting of the holders of the preferred stock is required in order to approve certain matters which would prejudice their interests, including;

 

amendments to the articles of incorporation to add new classes of shares to be issued, alter the terms of the shares or increase the number of shares or authorized number of any class of shares, with certain exceptions;

 

consolidations or splits of shares;

 

dividends of shares or stock acquisition rights to shareholders without any consideration;

 

grants of preemptive rights for new shares or stock acquisition rights;

 

amalgamations or mergers;

 

certain corporate splits;

 

share exchanges;

 

share transfers; and

 

other matters set forth in the articles of incorporation.

Except for the amendments described above, the articles of incorporation may expressly permit certain of the above matters to be approved without a separate resolution. Our articles of incorporation do not include that express permission.

Ranking

If issued, the outstanding shares of our preferred stock would rankpari passu with each other as to participation in our profits or assets, including dividends and distributions of residual assets upon our liquidation.

Unless holders of our preferred stock give approval, we may not create or issue any other shares ranking in priority in terms of the right to receive distributions of surplus or the right to receive distributions of residual assets or otherwise in priority to the preferred stock already issued. However, without obtaining the consent of holders of the preferred stock, we may issue other preferred stock rankingpari passu with the preferred stock

already issued as to the order of participation in our profits or assets, carrying rights to preferred dividends, or terms of conversion that our board of directors may determine, subject to limitations set forth in our articles of incorporation and the Companies Act.

Purchase or Redemption of Preferred Stock

Subject to the requirements of the Companies Act, we may purchase out of our prescribed distributable amounts any shares of our preferred stock outstanding at any time and cancel that preferred stock. In June 2013, we amended our articles of incorporation in order to qualify our preferred stock for inclusion in our regulatory capital in accordance with the new FSA capital adequacy guidelines based on the Basel III framework. Under the amended articles of incorporation, we will acquire our outstanding preferred stock without consideration or in exchange for common stock if we becomenon-viable.

Mandatory Redemption Provisions and Sinking Fund Provisions

Our articles of incorporation do not provide any mandatory redemption provisions and sinking fund provisions.

Stock Splits

Our articles of incorporation provide that no stock split shall be made to the preferred stock unless otherwise provided for in any law or regulation.

Subscription Rights

Our articles of incorporation provide that we shall not grant holders of preferred stock any right to subscribe for new shares or stock acquisition rights.

Conditions to Change Shareholders’ Rights

Our articles of incorporation do not specify what actions or quorums are required to change the rights of holders of our stock.

General Meeting of Shareholders

Our ordinary general meeting of shareholders is held within three months after the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we may hold an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders whenever necessary. Notice of a general meeting of shareholders stating the place, the time and the purpose thereof, and certain matters set forth in the Companies Act and in ordinances of the Ministry of Justice, must be given to each holder of shares of common stock with voting rights (or to the standing proxy or mailing address in Japan of a nonresident shareholder) at least two weeks prior to the date set for the meeting. The record date for an ordinary general meeting of shareholders is March 31 of each year.

Any shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least three percent of the total outstanding voting rights, for a continuous period of six months or longer, may require the convocation of a general meeting of shareholders for a particular purpose. Unless such a general meeting of shareholders is convened promptly, or a convocation notice of a meeting which is to be held not later than eight weeks from the day of such demand is dispatched, the requiring shareholders may, upon obtaining court approval, convene such general meeting of shareholders.

Any shareholder holding at least 300 voting rights or one percent of our total number of voting rights for six months or longer may propose a matter to be considered at a general meeting of shareholders, and request to include the proposal (the number of which may be limited to 10) in a notice of a general meeting of shareholders, by submitting a written request to a director at least eight weeks prior to the date of the meeting. Any of the

minimum percentages, time periods and number of voting rights necessary for exercising the minority shareholder rights described above may be decreased or shortened if our articles of incorporation so provide. Our articles of incorporation currently do not include any of those provisions.

To attend a general meeting of shareholders in person or by proxy, shareholders must provide proof of identity upon request. Shareholders may appoint a proxy by a written power of attorney for the meeting. Such proxy must be one of our shareholders with voting rights.

Limitations on the Rights to Hold Our Common Stock by Foreign Investors

There are no specific limitations imposed by the laws of Japan, our articles of incorporation, or our other constituent documents, on the rights of nonresidents or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares of common stock or preferred stock. For more information, See “Common Stock—Voting Rights.”

Anti-Change in Control Provisions

There is no provision in our articles of incorporation that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, and that would operate only with respect to a merger, consolidation, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving us.

Provisions Governing Changes in the Company’s Capital

We have no conditions more stringent than are required by law imposed by our articles of incorporation governing changes in capital.

10.C.    MATERIAL CONTRACTS

All contracts that we are currently a party to, or were a party to during our two most recently completed fiscal years up to the date of this annual report, were entered into in the ordinary course of business or were otherwise immaterial.

10.D.    EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Japanese Foreign Exchange Regulations

The following is a general summary of major Japanese foreign exchange controls regulations applicable to holders of shares of our common stock or voting rights thereunder who are “Foreign investors,” as described below. The statements regarding Japanese foreign exchange controls regulations set forth below are based on the laws and regulations in force and as interpreted by the Japanese authorities as of the date of this registration statement and are subject to subsequent changes in the applicable Japanese laws or interpretations thereof. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible foreign exchange controls considerations that may apply to a particular investor, and potential investors are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall foreign exchange controls consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock or voting rights thereunder by consulting their own advisors.

The Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act of Japan, (the “FEFTA”), and the cabinet orders and ministerial ordinances, collectively known as the Foreign Exchange Act, set forth, among other things, the regulations relating to the receipt by nonresidents of Japan of payment with respect to our shares, and the acquisition and holding of our shares by nonresidents of Japan and foreign investors, both as defined below.

Nonresidents of Japan are individuals who are not residents in Japan and corporations whose principal offices are located outside Japan. Generally, branches and offices of nonresident corporations located in Japan are regarded as residents of Japan while the branches and offices of Japanese corporations located outside Japan are regarded as nonresidents of Japan.

“Foreign investors” are defined as:

 

individuals not residing in Japan;
(i)

individuals not residing in Japan;

 

corporations which are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan;

corporations of which 50% or more of the voting rights are held, directly or indirectly, by individuals not residing in Japan and/or corporations which are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan; and
(ii)

corporations which are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan;

 

corporations, a majority of officers (or a majority of officers having the power of representation) of which are individuals not residing in Japan.
(iii)

corporations of which 50% or more of the voting rights are held, directly or indirectly, by individuals not residing in Japan and/or corporations which are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan; and

(iv)

partnerships under the Civil Code of Japan (Act No. 89 of 1896, as amended) established to invest in corporations, limited partnerships for investment under the Limited Partnership Act for Investment of Japan (Act No. 90 of 1998, as amended), or any other similar partnerships under foreign law, of which (a) 50% or more of the total contributions are made by individuals and/or corporations falling within (i), (ii), (iii) above and/or (v) below or any other persons prescribed under the Foreign Exchange Act or (b) a majority of the general partners are individuals and/or corporations falling within (i), (ii), (iii) above and/or (v) below or any other persons prescribed under the Foreign Exchange Act; and

(v)

corporations, a majority of officers (or a majority of officers having the power of representation) of which are individuals not residing in Japan.

Acquisition of Shares

In general, a nonresident who acquires our shares from a resident of Japan is not subject to any prior filing requirement, although the Foreign Exchange Act authorizes the Minister of Finance of Japan and the Ministers responsible for the business to require a prior submission for any such acquisition in certain limited circumstances.

If a foreign investor acquires shares of our common stock, and, together with parties who have a special relationship with such foreign investor, holds 10% or more of the issued shares of our common stock as a result of the acquisition, the foreign investor must file a report of the acquisition with the Minister of Finance and any other competent minister by the fifteenth day of the month immediately following the month to which the date of such acquisition belongs.

Except for the general limitation under Japanese antitrust and antimonopoly regulations against shareholdings in the capital stock of a Japanese corporation, which lead or may lead to a restraint of trade or monopoly, and general limitations under the Companies Act or our articles of incorporation on the rights of shareholders applicable, regardless of residence or nationality, there is no limitation under Japanese law and regulations applicable to us, or under our articles of incorporation on the rights of nonresident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares.

Inward Direct Investment in Shares of Listed Companies

For the purpose of the regulations in connection with the “inward direct investment” under the Foreign Exchange Act, Japanese listed companies are classified into the following categories:

(i)

companies engaged only in the businesses other than certain businesses (the “Designated Businesses”) designated by the Foreign Exchange Act as Designated Businesses;

(ii)

companies engaged in the Designated Businesses other than the certain Designated Businesses designated by the Foreign Exchange Act as core sector businesses (the “Core Sector Designated Businesses”); and

(iii)

companies engaged in the Core Sector Designated Businesses.

For reference purposes only, the Minister of Finance publishes, and may update from time to time, a list that classifies Japanese listed companies into the above categories, and according to the list published by the Minister of Finance as of July 10, 2020, businesses which are currently engaged by the Company is classified as category (iii) i.e., the Core Sector Designated Businesses above.

Definition of Inward Direct Investment

If a foreign investor acquires shares or voting rights of a Japanese company that is listed on a Japanese stock exchange and, as a result of the acquisition, the foreign investor, in combination with any existing holdings,

directly or indirectly holds 1% or more of the issued shares or the total number of voting rights of the relevant company, such acquisition constitutes an “inward direct investment.” In addition, acquisition of the authority to exercise, or instruct to exercise, voting rights held by other shareholders that results in the foreign investor, in combination with any existing shareholding, directly or indirectly holding 1% or more of the total number of voting rights of the relevant company, constitutes an “inward direct investment.”

In addition to the acquisitions of shares or voting rights described above, if a foreign investor (i) is granted the authority to exercise proxy voting rights on behalf of other shareholders of the relevant company regarding certain matters which may control substantially or have material influence on the management of such company such as the election or removal of directors or (ii) obtains consent from another foreign investor holding the voting rights of the relevant company to exercise the voting rights of such company jointly, and, in each case, as a result of these arrangements, the number of the voting rights directly or indirectly held by the foreign investor, including the total number of the voting rights subject to such proxy, or the sum of the number of the voting rights directly or indirectly held by the foreign investor and such other foreign investors subject to such joint voting agreement, as the case may be, is 10% or more of the total number of voting rights of the relevant company, each such arrangement regarding voting rights (“voting arrangement”) constitutes an “inward direct investment.” Additionally, if a foreign investor who directly or indirectly holds 1% or more of the total voting rights of a Japanese listed company, at the general meeting of shareholders, consents to certain proposals having material influence on the management of such company such as (i) election of such foreign investor or its related persons (as defined in the Foreign Exchange Act) as directors or corporate auditors of the relevant company or (ii) transfer or discontinuation of its business, such consent will also constitute an “inward direct investment.”

Prior Notification Requirements

If a foreign investor intends to consummate an acquisition of shares or voting rights of a Japanese listed company that constitutes an “inward direct investment” as described above, in certain circumstances, such as where the foreign investor is in a country that is not listed on an exemption schedule in the Foreign Exchange Act or where that Japanese company is engaged in the Designated Businesses, prior notification of the relevant inward direct investment must be filed with the Minister of Finance and any other competent Ministers.

However, a foreign investor seeking to acquire shares or voting rights of a Japanese listed company or the authority to exercise, either directly or through instructions, voting rights held by other shareholders that constitutes an “inward direct investment” may be eligible for the exemptions, if certain conditions are met.

In the case of an acquisition of shares or voting rights or the authority to exercise, voting rights of a Japanese listed company that is engaged in the Core Sector Designated Businesses, which are currently engaged by the Company, the foreign investor may be exempted from the prior notification requirement, if, as a result of such acquisition, the foreign investor directly or indirectly holds less than 10% of the total number of issued shares or voting rights of the relevant company, and such foreign investor complies with the following conditions:

(i)

the foreign investor or its closely-related persons (as defined in the Foreign Exchange Act) will not become directors or corporate auditors of the relevant company;

(ii)

the foreign investor will not make certain proposals (as prescribed in the Foreign Exchange Act) at the general meeting of shareholders, including transfer or discontinuation of the Designated Businesses of the relevant company;

(iii)

the foreign investor will not access non-public technical information in relation to the Designated Businesses of the relevant company, or take certain other actions that may lead to the leak of such non-public technical information (as prescribed in the Foreign Exchange Act);

(iv)

the foreign investor will not attend, or not cause any persons designated by it to attend, meetings of the relevant company’s board of directors, or meetings of committees having authority to make important decisions, in respect of the Core Sector Designated Businesses of the relevant company; and

(v)

the foreign investor will not make, or not cause any persons designated by it to make, proposals to such board or committees or their members in writing or electronic form requesting any response or actions by certain deadlines in respect of the Core Sector Designated Businesses of the relevant company.

Notwithstanding the above, if a foreign investor falls under a category of disqualified investors designated by the Foreign Exchange Act (including (a) investors who have records of certain sanctions due to violations of the FEFTA and (b) certain investors who are state-owned enterprises or other related entities excluding those who are accredited by the Minister of Finance), in no event may such foreign investor be eligible for the exemptions described above. On the other hand, if a foreign investor, excluding the disqualified investors described in the foregoing sentence, falls under a category of certain foreign financial institutions (as prescribed in the Foreign Exchange Act) and complies with the conditions for the exemption (i) through (iii) above, such foreign investor may be eligible for the exemptions, even if the acquisition results in such foreign investor’s directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the total number of issued shares or voting rights of the corporation engaged in the Core Sector Designated Businesses.

In addition, if a foreign investor intends to make a voting arrangement with respect to a Japanese listed company engaged in the Designated Businesses or consents to a proposal at the general meeting of shareholders of such company, in each case, that constitutes an “inward direct investment” as described above, in certain circumstances, prior notification of the relevant inward direct investment must be filed with the Minister of Finance and any other competent Ministers. However, the exemptions from the prior notification requirements may be available in the cases where the relevant voting arrangement is regarding matters other than certain matters which may control substantially or have material influence on the management of the relevant company, such as the election or removal of directors, which would have required prior notification.

Procedures for Prior Notification

If such prior notification is filed, the proposed inward direct investment may not be consummated until after 30 days have passed from the date of filing, although this screening period may be shortened to two weeks unless such Ministers deem it necessary to review the proposed inward direct investment. The Ministers may extend the screening period up to five months if they deem it necessary to review the proposed inward direct investment and may recommend any modification or abandonment of the proposed inward direct investment and, if the foreign investor does not accept such recommendation, the Ministers may order the modification or abandonment of such inward direct investment. In addition, if the Ministers consider the proposed inward direct investment to be an inward direct investment that is likely to cause damage to the national security of Japan and, if a foreign investor (i) consummates such inward direct investment without filing the prior notification described above; (ii) consummates such inward direct investment before the expiration of the screening period described above; (iii) in connection with such inward direct investment, makes false statements in the prior notification described above; or (iv) does not follow the recommendation or order issued by the Ministers to modify or abandon such inward direct investment, the Ministers may order such foreign investor to dispose of all or part of the shares acquired or take other measures.

Post Facto Reporting Requirements

A foreign investor who consummates an inward direct investment as described above through an acquisition of shares or voting rights or the authority to exercise, directly or through instructions, voting rights of a Japanese listed company that is engaged in the Designated Businesses, but is not subject to the prior notification requirements described above due to the exemptions from such prior notification requirements, in general, must file a report of the relevant inward direct investment with the Minister of Finance and any other competent Ministers having jurisdiction over such Japanese company within 45 days of such inward direct investment when, as a result of such acquisition, the foreign investor (excluding, in the cases of (i) and (ii) below, a foreign investor who falls under a category of certain foreign financial institutions (as prescribed in the Foreign Exchange Act)) directly or indirectly holds (i) 1% or more but less than 3% of the total number of issued shares

or voting rights, for the first time, (ii) 3% or more but less than 10% of the total number of issued shares or voting rights, for the first time, or (iii) 10% or more of the total number of issued shares or voting rights.

Dividends and Proceeds of Sale

Under the Foreign Exchange Act, dividends paid on, and the proceeds of sales in Japan of, shares held by nonresidents of Japan, may, in general, be converted into any foreign currency and repatriated abroad. The acquisition of our shares by nonresidents by way of a stock split is not, in general, subject to any notification or reporting requirements.

10.E.    TAXATION

Japanese Taxation

The following is a summary of the principal Japanese national tax consequences to owners of shares of our common stock or ADSs representing shares of our common stock who are Nonresident Shareholders. The statements regarding Japanese tax laws set forth below are based on the laws and treaties currently in force and as interpreted by the Japanese tax authorities at the date of this annual report and are subject to changes in the applicable Japanese law or tax treaties, conventions or agreements, or in the interpretation thereof, occurring after that date. This summary does not include all possible tax considerations which may apply to a particular investor and potential investors are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock or ADSs, including specifically the tax consequences under Japanese law, the laws of the jurisdiction of which they are resident, and any tax treaty, convention or agreement between Japan and their country of residence, by consulting their own tax advisors.

For the purpose of Japanese taxation, a Nonresident Shareholder of ADSs will generally be treated as the owner of the shares underlying the ADSs, which may be evidenced by one or more American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”).

Generally, a Nonresident Shareholder of shares of our common stock or ADSs will be subject to Japanese income tax collected by way of withholding on dividends we pay. Stock splits are, in general, not subject to Japanese income tax or corporation tax.

In the absence of any applicable tax treaty, convention or agreement reducing the maximum rate of Japanese withholding tax or allowing exemption from Japanese withholding tax, the rate of Japanese withholding tax applicable to dividends paid by a Japanese corporation to Nonresident Shareholders is generally 20.42%. However, with respect to dividends paid on listed shares issued by a Japanese corporation (including shares of our common stock or ADSs) to Nonresident Shareholders, except for any individual shareholder who owns 3% or more of the total number of shares issued by the relevant Japanese corporation, the aforementioned 20.42% withholding tax rate is reduced to 15.315% for dividends due and payable on or before December 31, 2037. Due to the imposition of a special additional withholding tax (2.1% of the original withholding tax amount) to secure funds for reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake, the original withholding tax rate of 15% and 20%, as applicable, has been effectively increased, respectively, to 15.315% and 20.42%, during the period beginning on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2037.

At the date of this annual report, Japan has income tax treaties in force, whereby the above-mentioned withholding tax rate is reduced, generally, to 15% for portfolio investors, with, among others, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore and Spain (for dividends due and payable on or before December 31, 2021), while the income tax treaties with, among others, Australia, Austria, Belgium, France, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States generally reduce the withholding tax rate to 10% for portfolio investors and the income tax treaties with, among others, Spain (for dividends due and payable on or after January 1, 2022)

generally reduce the withholding tax rate to 5% for portfolio investors. In addition, under the income tax treaty between Japan and the United States, dividends paid to pension funds which are qualified U.S. residents eligible to enjoy treaty benefits are exempt from Japanese income taxation by way of withholding or otherwise unless the dividends are derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by those pension funds. Under the income tax treaties with Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, the Netherlands, Spain (for dividends due and payable on or after January 1, 2022), Switzerland and the United Kingdom, similar treatment will be applied to dividends. Under Japanese tax law, any reduced maximum rate applicable under a tax treaty will be available when the maximum rate is below the rate otherwise applicable under Japanese tax law referred to in the preceding paragraph with respect to the dividends to be paid by us on shares of common stock or ADSs. A Nonresident Shareholder of shares of our common stock who is entitled, under any tax treaty, to a reduced rate of Japanese withholding tax, or exemption therefrom, as the case may be, is required to submit an Application Form for Income Tax Convention Regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax and Special Income Tax for Reconstruction on Dividends (together with any other required forms and documents) in advance, through the withholding agent, to the relevant tax authority before payment of dividends. A standing proxy for a Nonresident Shareholder may provide the application services. See “Item 10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation—Rights, Preferences and Restrictions of the Shares—Common Stock—General.” In addition, a simplified special filing procedure is available for Nonresident Shareholders to claim treaty benefits of exemption from or reduction of Japanese withholding tax by submitting a Special Application Form for Income Tax Convention Regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax and Special Income Tax for Reconstruction on Dividends of Listed Stocks (together with any other required forms and documents). With respect to ADSs, this reduced rate or exemption will be applicable to Nonresident Shareholders of ADSs if the Depositarydepositary or its agent submits two Application Forms (one before payment of dividends and the other within eight months after the record date concerning such payment of dividends), together with certain other documents. To claim this reduced rate or exemption, Nonresident Shareholders of ADSs will be required to file a proof of taxpayer status, residence and beneficial ownership, as applicable, and to provide other information or documents as may be required by the Depositary.depositary. A Nonresident Shareholder who is entitled, under any applicable tax treaty, to a reduced rate of Japanese withholding tax below the rate otherwise applicable under Japanese tax law mentioned above, or exemption therefrom, as the case may be, but fails to submit the required application in advance may nevertheless be entitled to claim a refund from the relevant Japanese tax authority of withholding taxes withheld in excess of the rate under an applicable tax treaty (if the Nonresident Shareholder is entitled to a reduced treaty rate under the applicable tax treaty) or the full amount of tax withheld (if the Nonresident Shareholder is entitled to an exemption under the applicable tax treaty), as the case may be, by complying with certain subsequent filing procedures. We do not assume any responsibility to ensure withholding at the reduced treaty rate, or exemption

therefrom, for shareholders who would be so eligible under an applicable tax treaty but where the required procedures as stated above are not followed.

Gains derived from the sale outside Japan of shares of our common stock or ADSs by a Nonresident Shareholder who is a portfolio investor are, in general, not subject to Japanese income tax or corporation tax.

Any deposits or withdrawals of shares of our common stock by a Nonresident Shareholder in exchange for ADSs are, in general, not subject to Japanese income or corporation tax.

Japanese inheritance and gift taxes at progressive rates may be payable by an individual who has acquired shares of our common stock or ADSs from another individual as a legatee, heir or donee, even if none of the acquiring individual, the decedent or the donor is not a Japanese resident.

Potential investors should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the Japanese tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of shares of common stock or ADSs in light of their particular situations.

United States Federal Income Taxation

The following is a discussion of material U.S. federal income tax consequences to the U.S. Holders described below of owning and disposing of shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive

description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold the shares or ADSs. This discussion does not address U.S. state, local ornon-U.S. tax consequences. As used herein, a U.S. Holder is a person that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:and is: (1) a citizen or individual resident of the United States; (2) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or (3) an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.

The discussion applies only to U.S. Holders who hold the shares or ADSs as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The discussion does not address any alternative minimum or Medicare contribution tax consequences, nor does it address all of the tax consequences which may be applicable to special classes of holders, such as:

 

certain financial institutions;

 

insurance companies;

 

dealers and certain traders in securities;

 

persons holding shares or ADSs as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction;

 

persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

 

regulated investment companies;

 

real estate investment trusts;

 

partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

 

tax-exempt entities, “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs”;

 

persons who acquired our shares or ADSs pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation;

 

persons holding shares or ADSs that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of our voting stock;stock (by vote or value); or

 

persons holding shares or ADSs in connection with a trade or business conducted outside the United States.

If a partnership holds shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding shares or ADSs, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors.

This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed United States Treasury regulations, as well as the double taxation treaty between Japan and the United States (“Treaty”) all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. It is also based in part on representations by the Depositarydepositary and assumes that each obligation under the Deposit Agreementdeposit agreement and any related agreement or undertaking will be performed in accordance with its terms.

In general, a U.S. Holder who owns ADSs will be treated as the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a U.S. Holder exchanges ADSs for the underlying shares represented by those ADSs.

The U.S. Treasury has expressed concern that parties to whom ADSs are released before shares are delivered to the depositary, or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between holders and the issuer of the security underlying the ADSs, may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by holders of ADSs. These actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate of tax,

described below, applicable to dividends received by certain noncorporate holders. Accordingly, the creditability of Japanese taxes, and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain noncorporate U.S. Holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.

U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal, state, local andnon-U.S. tax consequences of owning and disposing of shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.

This discussion assumes that we are not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”), as described below.

Taxation of Distributions

Distributions received by a U.S. Holder on shares or ADSs, including the amount of any Japanese taxes withheld, other than certain pro rata distributions of shares, will constitute foreign-source dividend income to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, we expect that distributions generally will be reported to a U.S. Holder as dividends. The amount of the dividend a U.S. Holder will be required to include in income will equal the U.S. dollar value of the yen dividend, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the payment is received by the holder, or in the case of ADSs, by the Depositary,depositary, regardless of whether the payment is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, the U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend payment. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt. Any foreign currency gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition of yen will be U.S.-source ordinary income or loss. Corporate U.S. Holders will not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to our dividends. Subject to applicable limitations, and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends received from us by certain noncorporate U.S. Holders may be taxable at favorable rates. Noncorporate U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be taxed at these favorable rates.

Subject to applicable restrictions and limitations that vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury Japanese taxes withheld from dividends on shares or ADSs (at a rate not exceeding the applicable rate provided by the Treaty in the case of a

U.S. Holder who is eligible for the Treaty’s benefits) will be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to twodifferent categories of income, such as passive income and general income. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex. Instead of claiming a credit, a U.S. Holder may elect to deduct such Japanese taxes in computing its taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits must apply to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits and deductions in their particular circumstances.

Sale and Other Disposition of the Shares or ADSs

A U.S. Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder has held the shares or ADSs for more than one year. The amount of the U.S. Holder’s gain or loss will equal the difference between the amount realized on the sale or other disposition and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the shares or ADSs, each as determined in U.S. dollars. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes.

PFIC Rules

Based upon certain proposed Treasury regulations that are not yet in effect, but are generally proposed to become effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994, we believe that we were not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended March 31, 2018.2021. However, since proposed Treasury regulations may not be finalized in their current form, and since PFIC status depends upon the composition of our income and assets and the market value of our assets from time to time, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to the U.S. Holder.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient or, in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals (or entities closely held by individuals) may be required to report information relating to their ownership of an interest in certain foreign financial assets, including stock of anon-U.S. person, generally on Form 8938, subject to exceptions (including an exception for stock held in a financial account, in which case the account may be reportable if maintained by anon-U.S. financial institution). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations with respect to the shares or ADSs.

10.F.    DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS

Not applicable.

10.G.    STATEMENT BY EXPERTS

Not applicable.

10.H.    DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with these requirements, we file annual reports on Form20-F and furnish periodic reports on Form6-K with the SEC.

These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Rooma website maintained by calling the SEC in the United States at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at https://www.sec.gov that contains reports and proxy information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.. Some of the information may also be found on our website at http:https://www.smfg.co.jp.www.smfg.co.jp/english/.

10.I.    SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION

Not applicable.

 

Item 11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk

On April 1, 2017, we introduced SMBC Group-wide business units and a CxO system. In addition, we transitioned to a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee from a board of corporate auditors governance system, following approval at our ordinary general meeting of shareholders held on June 29, 2017. In connection with the foregoing, we changed our risk management system, including by introducing a Group Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) who reports to the board of directors and its internal committees and conducting various meetings for business executions to centrally identify and manage risks.

Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Risk Management

Basic ApproachRisk Culture

As risksIn order for us to realize and maintain a sustainable growth in corporate value, each one of our directors, officers and other employees should think and judge on their own if their actions meet the financial services industry increaseexpectations and

requirements of customers, markets, and other stakeholders, not just if they are compliant with laws and regulations. We have established “Principles of Action on Compliance and Risk” in diversityorder for all our directors, officers and complexity, risk management (identifying, measuring,other employees to hold onto as a “keystone” of their daily business. The principle includes “Business based on the Risk Appetite Framework” and controlling risk) has never been more important in“Business operations which give a high priority to the management of risks such as credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.” Concrete measures include internal surveys for monitoring the compliance awareness and risk sensitivity of our directors, officers and other employees as well as internal training for fostering a financial institution.

We conduct business operations based on our overarching Risk Appetite Framework (“RAF”).sound risk culture.

Risk Appetite Framework

We have introduced RAF to ensurea Risk Appetite Framework (“RAF”) for controlling SMBC Group-wide risks, that risk and return levels are appropriate. RAF clarifies the types and levels of risk that we are willing to take on or are prepared to tolerate (risk appetite) in order to grow profits basedprofits. RAF is one of two pivots of our business management alongside business strategies. It functions as a management framework for sharing information on an accurate understanding of the operating environment and the inherent risks (risk appetite). RAF also contains provisionsfacing us among management and for controlling SMBC Group-wide risk. Accordingly, RAF provides a central pillar offacilitating appropriate risk taking based thereon. Individual risk appetites have been established for specific business management alongside business strategy.

Our basic position andunits or strategies as necessary based on our overall risk appetite specifics are set out in an internal document for SMBC Group-wide use.

Risk Appetiteappetite.

We have a Risk Appetite Statement that provides a qualitative explanation of our approach to risk taking and risk management for each category: soundness, profitability, liquidity, credit, market, operational and conduct. We also have quantitative measures (i.e., Risk Appetite Measures) that function as benchmarks for risks that we are considering taking and for risk / return.

ForRisk appetites are decided during the soundness category, our Risk Appetite Statement has “maintain a sufficient levelprocess of capital to support sustainable growth” as the overall policy. It also includes specific policies for the fiscal year in questionformulating business strategies and management policies. These risk appetites are set based on our view of the environment and risk. The common equity Tier 1 ratio, the leverage ratio, and several other indicators have been established as Risk Appetite Measures.

Risk appetite has been established for specific business units or strategies as necessary based on our overall risk appetite.

Operation of Risk Appetite Framework

The process of setting risk appetite for each fiscal year begins with discussions and the sharing of information on the current and future business environment and risks by the Management Committee and the board of directors.Top Risks that threaten to severelysignificantly impact management are identified as Top Risks. Risk appetite is then decidedand on the basis of risk analyses (stress testing) that illustrate the impact if a risk might be realized. Business strategyshould materialize. In addition, risk register and policies forKey Risk Events (“KRE”) are utilized in verifying the conductadequacy of Top Risks, risk appetites, and business are drawn up on the basis of the risk appetite decisions.strategies.

The outlooks for the operating environment and risks including Top Risks,and the risk appetite situation are continuously updated overmonitored throughout the course of the fiscal year’s business and the situations relating to risk appetite are regularly monitored through the status of Risk Appetite Measures.year. Risk Appetite Measures and business strategies are revised as necessary.

Three For example, overall risk capital has been selected as an indicator for risk appetite, which displays the soundness of the SMBC Group. Risk capital is the amount of capital required to cover the theoretical maximum potential loss arising from risks of business operations. Overall risk capital is the aggregate of the risk capital amounts for each risk category. Management standards have been set for the upper limit for overall risk capital based on group-wide management strength. Overall risk capital levels are set for Risk Appetite Measures, which arethus monitored accordingly.throughout the course of each fiscal year to clearly indicate risk-taking capacity and promote the sound taking of risks.

Comprehensive Risk Management

The risks that need to be managed on an SMBC Group-wide basisIn addition, specific risk appetite indicators have been defined asset for credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk. Risks are managedother risk categories to facilitate appropriate management based on their characteristics.

In addition, necessary guidance is provided to SMBC Group companies in identifying categoriesa quantitative understanding of risk they need to address in their particular businesses. These risk categories are continuously reviewed and new ones may be added in response to changes in the operating environment.

Thorough assessments of the operating environment and risks, including Top Risks, are carried out to ensure effective operation of RAF, after which risks are managed systematically through frameworks for risk analysis via stress testing and risk capital management.appetite.

Types of Risk to be ManagedManagement Categories

We classify risk into the following categories:

Credit Risk. Credit risk is the possibility of a loss arising from a credit event, such as deterioration in the financial condition of a borrower, that causes an asset (includingoff-balance sheet transactions) to lose value or become worthless.

Market Risk. Market risk is the possibility that fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, stock prices or stockother market prices will change the market value of financial products, leading to a loss.

Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk that there may be difficulties in raising funds needed for settlements, as a result of the mismatching of uses of funds and sources of funds or unexpected outflows of funds, which may make it necessary to raise funds at higher rates than normal.

Operational Risk. Operational risk is the possibility of losses arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events.

Conduct Risk. Conduct risk is the risk that our conduct negatively affects customers, market integrity, effective competition, public interest, and the SMBC Group’s stakeholders through acts that violate laws and regulations or social norms.

Top Risks

We identify those risks that threaten to significantly impact management as Top Risks.

The selection of Top Risks involves comprehensive screening of risk factors, evaluation of each risk scenario’s possibility of occurrence and potential impact on management, and discussion inby the Risk Management Committee and the Management Committee. Top Risks are utilized to enhance risk management by being incorporated into discussions of RAF and the formulation of business strategies and into the creation of risk scenarios for stress testing.

Stress Testing

In the current volatile business environment, stress testing is essential for analyzing and estimating the effects of stress events brought about by risks such as economic recession and market turbulence. When establishing our medium-term management plan or annual business plan, we conductWe use stress testing to appraiseanalyze and comprehend the likely financial impact on our businesses of variouschanges in economic or market conditions, in order to plan and execute forward-looking business strategies.

In our stress eventstesting, we prepare multiple risk scenarios including macroeconomic variables such as GDP, stock prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates based on the aforementioned Top Risks, discussions with experts and related departments.

When developing business strategies, we set out scenarios assuming stressed business environments such as serious economic recessions and market disruption for the sake of assessing risk-taking capabilities at the SMBC Group so thatand verifying whether adequate soundness can be maintained under stress.

During a fiscal year, we can prepare actions in advanceundertake stress testing on a flexible basis to deal with such events as they occur.

Stress testing consists of four processes: scenario design, scenario finalization, calculation ofassess the potential impact on financial items,our business and confirmation byto take the Management Committee. In the scenario design process, scenarios are designed by the Corporate Risk Management Department after compiling information on our Top Risks and the views of related departments on such factors as future global trends. In the scenario finalization process, scenarios are revised as necessary based on the outcome of discussions between specialists and related departments. In the calculation of the impact on financial items process, we calculate the financial impact under each scenario and analyze their aggregate on financial items such as the Common Equity Tier 1 ratios. After these three processes, the scenarios and impact on financial items are reportedappropriate response in case a serious risk event occurs. For example, stress test was conducted with regard to the Management Committee for verification ofCOVID-19 pandemic during the appropriateness of business strategy.

Risk Capital Managementfiscal year ended March 31, 2021.

In managingaddition, we conduct detailed stress testing for individual risks such as credit risk, market risk, and operationalliquidity risk, affectingso as to decide and review risk-taking strategies.

We are also in line with the entire SMBC Group, we apply a uniform standard, risk capital based on value at risk (“VaR”), for use in monitoring and managing risks. This standard is applied while taking into account the characteristics of each risk andrecommendations of the businessesTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. As part of SMBC Group companies. Specificour efforts in this regard, we have included climate-related risk, capital measures include setting upper limits forsuch as natural disasters resulting from extreme weather (physical risks) and carbon-related stranded assets due to the transition to a decarbonized society (transition risks), in our Top Risks, and scenario analyses on physical and transition risks have been conducted to estimate the potential impacts on our financial position.

Risk Register

A risk exposure based on SMBC Group-wide andregister is formulated by each business unit for the purpose of realizing more sophisticated risk appetitegovernance and SMBC Group-wideenhancing business units’ risk ownership. In formulating these registers, business units communicate with risk management constitution. Eachdepartments to identify the risks present in their business, unit operatesand these risks are reflected in business operation withinstrategies after they have been evaluated and the adequacy of measures for controlling them has been verified.

Key Risk Events

KRE, external events that limit. Through these precautions, we practice management that maintains an appropriate balance betweenindicate the increased threat of risks, and returns based on a comprehensive perspective and secure sufficient financial soundness.

Disclosureshave been identified to ascertain the symptoms of the objectives, policiespotential risks. KRE are utilized to analyze and processesassess how likely similar cases will occur in our businesses and what effects such similar cases will have on us, and to manage eachenhance our risk and the methods used to measure each risk have been included in “Credit Risk,” “Market Risk and Liquidity Risk” and “Operational Risk.”management system.

Risk Management System

Top management plays an active role inBased on the risk management process outrecognition of recognition for the importance of risk management. Themanagement, the SMBC Group-wide basic policies for risk management are determined by the Management Committee before being authorized by the board of directors.directors in order to have top management play an active role in the risk management process.

In lineaccordance with these basic policies for risk management, the functions for managing major risks are consolidated within the Risk Management Unit, which is independent from business units,three lines of defense have been defined, and we seek to refine our risk management system through such means as enhancing comprehensive reviews of each risk category. In addition, the Internal Audit Unit conducts internal audits on the status of risk management to verify that risk is appropriately managed.

have clarified related roles and responsibilities. Risk management systems are in place at individual SMBC Group companies that have been established based on the characteristics of their particular businesses, and measures are being put in place to strengthen and improve the effectiveness of these systems.

Furthermore, we are strengthening SMBC Group-wide risk management systems through the Group Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) Committee and the Global CRO Committee.

Three Lines of Defense

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s “Corporate governance principles for banks” recommends “three lines of defense” as a framework for risk management and governance. Based on this framework, we have defined our three lines of defense with the aim of achieving more effective and stronger risk management and compliance systems through the clarification of roles and responsibilities.

Our three lines of defense are as follows:

First Line. The business units shall be risk owners concerning their operations and shall be responsible for the following in accordance with the basic policies. Furthermore,principles provided by Second Line.

Identification and evaluation of risks encountered in the business activities

we are sharing information on SMBC Group-wideImplementation of measures for minimizing and controlling risks

Monitoring of risks and reporting within First Line and to Second Line

Creation and fostering of a sound risk culture

Second Line. The Risk Management and Compliance Departments shall assume the following functions and responsibilities in order to manage the risk management and strengthening related systems through the Group CRO Committee, which consistscompliance systems.

Drafting and development of the Group CRObasic principles and risk management representatives from strategically important SMBC Group companies.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee is an internal committee of the board of directors, composed of outside directors as well as experts from inside and outside of the Company who possess specialized insight.

The Risk Committee meets regularly to discuss risk management topics, including Top Risks and RAF, from a specialist viewpoint. The results are reported to the board of directors as necessary.

Risk Management Committee

Chaired by the Group CRO and consisting of representatives from risk management divisions and business units, the Risk Management Committee is tasked with compiling and sharing information related to SMBC Group-wideframeworks concerning risk management and discussing this information as necessary.compliance

The committee discusses risks, RAF,

Oversight, monitoring, and other matters related to all areasdevelopment of training programs for First Line

Third Line. Independent from First Line and Second Line, the Audit Dept. shall assess and verify the effectiveness and appropriateness of risk management and reports itscompliance systems managed and operated by First Line and Second Line, and report these results to the Audit Committee and the Management Committee. The Department shall provide recommendations regarding identified issues or problems.

Implementation of Basel Regulation

Basel III is an international agreement on minimum capital, leverage, liquidity and other requirements applicable to internationally active banks. The Basel III capital framework was implemented in Japan from March 31, 2013 pursuant to revised capital adequacy guidelines adopted by the FSA, subject to thephase-in of some requirements, as contemplated by Basel III.

The framework of Basel III is a continuation of Basel II, with multiple approaches to calculating capital requirements; we adopted the advanced IRB approach for credit risk from March 31, 2009, and the AMA for operational risk from March 31, 2008.

Detailed information on our capital ratios is included in “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations Regarding Capital Adequacy and Liquidity” and “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Management.”

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of incurring losses from decline or loss of the value of an asset (including off-balance sheet items) that is caused by a credit event including but not limited to the deterioration of financial condition of a borrower. Overseas credits transactions also entail country risk, which is closely related to credit risk. Country risk is the risk of incurring losses caused by changes in political or economic conditions. Credit exposures arise primarily from lending activities such as loans and advances, acquiring investment securities, derivative transactions, and off-balance sheet transactions such as unused portion of loan commitments.

Credit Risk Management System

Credit risk is the most significant risk to which we are exposed. The purpose of credit risk management is to keep the credit risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital, to maintain the quality of assets and to ensure returns commensurate with risk.

At the SMBC Group, the Group CRO formulates credit risk management policies each year on the basis of SMBC Group-wide basic policies for risk management. The Credit & Investment Planning Department,

responsible for the comprehensive management of credit risk, drafts and administers credit risk regulations including the SMBC Group credit policies, manages non-performing loans (“NPLs”), and performs other aspects of credit portfolio management. Also, the Credit Risk Committee deliberates on matters related to SMBC Group-wide credit portfolios. SMBC Group companies follow the fundamental principles established by us to assess and manage credit risk. Each of SMBC Group companies manages credit risk according to the nature of its business, and assesses and manages the credit risks of individual loans and credit portfolios quantitatively, using consistent standards.

At SMBC, our significant banking subsidiary, the Credit & Investment Planning Department within the Risk Management Unit is responsible for the comprehensive management of credit risk. This department drafts and administers credit policies, the internal rating system, credit authority guidelines, and credit application guidelines, and manages NPLs, including impaired loans, and other aspects of credit portfolio management. The department also cooperates with the Corporate Risk Management Department in quantifying credit risk (risk capital and risk-weighted assets) and controls SMBC’s entire credit risk. Further, the Credit Portfolio Management Department within the Credit & Investment Planning Department strives to stabilize the credit portfolio and manage the risk through credit derivatives, loan asset sales and other instruments.

The credit departments of SMBC, within each business unitin cooperation with branches, conduct credit risk management for loans handled by its unit and manage portfolios of its unit.portfolios. The credit limits they use are based on the baseline amounts that the Credit & Investment Planning Department establishes for each grading category, with particular attention paid to evaluating and managing customers or loans perceived to have particularly high credit risk. The Corporate Research Department engages in research on industries and analyzes the business and financial conditions of borrower enterprises to detect early signs of problems or growth potential. The Credit Administration Department is responsible for handling NPLs of borrowers classified as potentially bankrupt or lower, and formulates plans for workouts, including write-offs, and corporate rehabilitation. The department closely liaises with SMBC Servicer Co., Ltd., an SMBC Group company, which engages in related services to efficiently reduce the amount of NPLs, including through the sale of loans.

The Internal Audit Unit of SMBC, operating independently of the business units, audits asset quality, accuracy of grading and state of credit risk management, and reports the results directly to the board of directors, and the Management Committee and Audit & Supervisory Committee.

SMBC has established the Credit Risk Committee to undertake control of credit risk and to ensure the overall soundness of the loan operations.

Credit Risk Management Methods

To effectively manage the risk involved in individual loans as well as the credit portfolio as a whole, we first acknowledge that every loan entails credit risk, assess the credit risk posed by each borrower and loan using an internal rating system, and quantify that risk for control purposes.

Credit Risk Evaluation

At SMBC, the Credit & Investment Planning Department manages an internal rating system for each asset control category set according to portfolio characteristics. For example, credits to commercial and industrial (“C&I”) companies, individuals for business purposes (domestic only), sovereigns, public sector entities, and financial institutions are assigned an “obligor grade,” which indicates the borrower’s creditworthiness, and/or “facility grade,” which indicates the collectability of assets taking into account the transaction conditions such as guarantee/collateral, and tenor. The business units determine an obligor grade by first assigning a financial grade using a financial strength grading model and data obtained from the obligor’s financial statements, including net worth and cash flows. The financial grade is then adjusted taking into account the actual state of the obligor’s financial position and qualitative factors to derive the obligor grade. The qualitative factors mainly include the

expected future cash flows taking into account factors such as historical loss information, the appropriateness of the borrower’s business plan or operational improvement plan, the status of progress of its plan, and the overall support from financial institutions. In the event that the borrower is domiciled overseas, internal ratings for credit are made after taking into consideration the country rank, which represents an assessment of the credit quality of each country based on its political and economic situation, as well as its current account balance and external debt. Obligor grades and facility grades are reviewed once a year and as otherwise necessary, such as when there are changes in the credit situation. Our subsidiaries carry out credit risk evaluations in line with SMBC.

There are also grading systems for loans to individuals such as housing loans and structured finance including project finance, where the repayment source is limited to the cash flows generated by a particular business or asset. For example, the obligor grade of housing loans is determined taking into account various relevant factors such as proportion of the repayment to revenue, proportion of down payment to the value and past due information.

The Credit & Investment Planning Department of SMBC centrally manages the internal rating systems, and designs, operates, supervises and validates the grading models. It validates the grading models (including statistical validation) of main assets following the procedure manual once a year to ensure their effectiveness and suitability.

Quantification of Credit Risk

At SMBC, credit risk quantification refers to the process of estimating the degree of credit risk of a portfolio or individual loan taking into account not just the obligor’s probability of default (“PD”), but also the concentration of risk in a specific customer or industry and the loss impact of fluctuations in the value of collateral, such as real estate and securities.

Specifically, the PD by grade, loss given default (“LGD”), credit quality correlation among obligors, and other parameter values are estimated using the historical data of obligors and facilities stored in a database to

calculate the credit risk. Then, based on these parameters, SMBC runs a simulation of simultaneous default using the Monte Carlo Simulation to calculate SMBC’s maximum loss exposure to the estimated amount of the maximum losses that may be incurred. Based on these quantitative results, SMBC allocates risk capital.

Risk quantification is also executed for purposes such as to determine the portfolio’s risk concentration or to simulate economic movements (stress tests), and the results are used for making optimal decisions across the whole range of business operations, including formulating business plans and providing a standard against which individual credit applications are assessed.

Credit Assessment

At SMBC, the credit assessment of corporate loans involves a variety of financial analyses, including cash flows, to predict an enterprise’s capability of loan repayment and its growth prospects. These quantitative measures, when combined with qualitative analyses of industrial trends, the enterprise’s research and development capabilities, the competitiveness of its products or services, and its management caliber, result in a comprehensive credit assessment. The loan application is analyzed in terms of the intended utilization of the funds and the repayment schedule. In the assessment of housing loans for individuals, SMBC employs a credit assessment model based on credit data amassed and analyzed by SMBC over many years, taking into account various relevant factors including proportion of the repayment to revenue, proportion of down payment to the value and past due information.

Credit Monitoring

At SMBC, in addition to analyzing loans at the application stage, the Credit Monitoring System is utilized to reassess obligor grades, and review credit policies for each obligor so that problems can be detected at an early

stage, and quick and effective action can be taken. The system includes annual monitoring that is carried out each time the financial results of the obligor enterprise are obtained, as well asad-hoc monitoring that is performed each time credit conditions change.

Credit Portfolio Management

Risk-Taking Within the Scope of Capital

To keep the credit risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital, the Corporate Risk Management Department of the Company sets a credit risk capital limit for internal control purposes. Under this limit,sub-limits are set for each business unit. The Corporate Risk Management Department conducts monthly monitoring to make sure that these limits are being followed.

Controlling Concentration Risk

As our equity capital may be materially impaired in the event that the credit concentration risk becomes apparent, the Credit & Investment Planning Department of the Company therefore takes measures to manage concentration risks, such as introducing large exposure limits and conducting intensive loan reviews for obligors with large exposures, with an increased focus on industrial sectors with an excessive concentration of credit risk. Further, to manage country risk, SMBC’s Global Credit Department of the International Banking Unit has credit limit guidelines based on each country’s creditworthiness.

Toward Active Portfolio Management

SMBC’s Credit Portfolio Management Department makes use of credit derivatives, loan asset sales, and other instruments to proactively and flexibly manage its portfolio to stabilize credit risk.

Market Risk and Liquidity Risk

Market risk is the possibility that fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, stock prices or other market prices will change the market value of financial products, leading to a loss. The purpose of market risk management is to keep the market risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital.

Liquidity risk is defined as the uncertainty around our ability to meet our debt obligations without incurring unacceptably large losses. An example of such risk is the possible inability to meet our current and future cash flow/collateral needs, both expected and unexpected. In such cases, we may be required to raise funds at less than favorable rates or be unable to raise sufficient funds for settlement. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that we are in a position to address our liquidity obligations through monitoring the liquidity gap between assets and liabilities, and by maintaining highly liquid supplementary funding resources.

On the basis of the SMBC Group-wide basic policies for risk management, we have a quantitative management process to control market and liquidity risks on an SMBC Group-wide basis by setting allowable risk limits by company.basis. We at least annually review and identify which companies primarily carry the market and liquidity risks within the SMBC Group.us. We set permissible levels and upper limits of risk for each identified company in consideration of those companies’ business plans. We ensure that each identified company establishes a risk management system that is appropriate to the risks it faces, and hasbuilt-in transparent risk management processes which clearly separatesseparate front, middle and back office operations, and establishes a control system of mutual checks and balances.

Framework for Market and Liquidity Risk Management

The board of directors authorizes important matters relating to the management of market and liquidity risks, such as the basic policies and risk limits,appetite, which are decided by the Management Committee.

The Corporate Risk Management Department, which is independent of the business units that directly handle market transactions, manages market and liquidity risks in an integrated manner. The Corporate Risk Management Department not only monitors the current risk situations but also reports regularly to the Management Committee and the board of directors. Furthermore,

Additionally, the Asset Liability Management (“ALM”) Committee meets on a quarterly basis to examine reports on the state of market and liquidity risk management and to discuss our ALM operation policies. Furthermore, SMBC’s ALM Committee meets on a monthly basis to examine reports on the state of observance of SMBC’s limits on market and liquidity risks and to discuss SMBC’s ALM operations.

The Internal Audit Unit of SMBCUnder our internal audit system, internal audits are also periodically performs internal auditsperformed to verify that the risk management framework is functioning properly.

Market Risk Management Methods

Market Risk Management Process

We manage market risk capital derived from trading activities andnon-trading activities, including strategic equity investmentshareholding investments and other transactions withinin the risk capital limit, which is determinedRAF by taking into account our shareholders’ equity and other principal indicators of our financial position. We also establish an upper limit on VaRvalue at risk (“VaR”) and losses within the risk capital limits.as Risk Appetite Measures.

Our market risk can be divided into various factors: interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and option risks. We manage each of these risks by employing the VaR method as well as supplemental indicators suitable for managing each risk, such as the basis point value (“BPV”).

VaR is the largest predicted loss that is possible given a fixed confidence interval. For example, our VaR indicates the largest loss that is possible for a holding period of one day and a confidence interval of 99.0%. BPV is the amount of change in assessed value as a result of aone-basis-point (0.01%) movement in interest rates.

Market Risk Measurement Techniques—Value at Risk

The principal SMBC Group companies’ internal VaR model makes use of historical data to prepare scenarios for market fluctuations and, by conducting simulations of gains and losses on a net position basis, the model estimates the maximum losses that may occur. The VaR calculation method we employ for both trading andnon-trading activities is based mainly on the following:

 

the historical simulation method;

 

aone-sided confidence interval of 99.0%;

 

aone-day holding period (aone-year holding period for the strategic equityshareholding investment portfolio); and

 

an observation period of four years (ten years for the strategic equityshareholding investment portfolio).

This method is reviewed periodically and refined, if necessary.

The relationship between the VaR calculated by the model and the actual profit and loss data is back-tested periodically. The back-testing results for the SMBC Group’s trading accounts during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 are shown below. There were no significant excess losses in the back-testing results including the trading accounts. The back-testing results are reviewed by management, which demonstrate thatalso monitors the SMBC Group’songoing suitability of the VaR model, with aone-sided confidence interval of 99.0%, is sufficiently reliable.

Back-Testing Results (Trading Book—SMFG consolidated)

(in ¥100 million)

LOGOmodel.

Trading Activities

Most of our trading activity is undertaken to accommodate the needs of commercial banking customers for interest rate and foreign exchange transactions. However, some interest rate and foreign exchange rate positions are taken using derivatives and otheron-balance sheet instruments with the objective of earning a profit from favorable movements in market rates. The overall objective of managing market risk is to avoid unexpected losses due to changes in market prices.

Non-trading Activities

The market risk fornon-trading activity arises principally from the interest rate risk of our ALM operations, or banking, including loans, debt investment securities, deposits, and long- and short-term borrowings, and from the equity risk of our strategic shareholding investments. ALM operations are regularly reviewed and discussed by the ALM Committee so as not to be heavily exposed to market fluctuations. Strategic equityshareholding investment is a portfolio that consists principally of publicly traded Japanese equities. This portfolio, like that of other financial institutions in Japan, has historically included shares of our customers.

VaR Summary for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020

The following tables show our VaR by risk category and these figures are prepared based on the internal reporting provided to management.

Our material market risk exposure categories consist of interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, equities and commodities risk and others. The section headed “VaR for Trading Activity” shows our VaR for instruments entered into for trading purposes and the VaR model for the trading book includes principal consolidated subsidiaries. The section headed “VaR forNon-Trading Activity” shows our VaR for instruments entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. “Strategic EquityShareholding Investment” in the “VaR forNon-Trading Activity” section is a portfolio that consists principally of publicly traded Japanese equities. This portfolio, like that of other financial institutions in Japan, has historically included shares of our customers.

VaR for Trading Activity

 

  Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1)   Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1) 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

          

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

          

SMBC Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥3.2   ¥4.3   ¥3.9   ¥3.6   ¥11.2   ¥6.1   ¥8.8   ¥1.7   ¥3.9   ¥8.1 

Minimum

   1.3    1.2    0.0    1.4    3.5    3.7    6.1    0.0    2.5    5.5 

Daily average

   2.1    2.4    1.5    2.3    7.2    5.1    7.3    0.5    3.2    6.5 

At March 31, 2018

   2.6    3.6    0.0    3.2    8.1 

At March 31, 2021

   5.5    8.1    0.1    3.5    6.2 

SMFG Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥30.9   ¥5.0   ¥11.4   ¥3.6   ¥39.5   ¥15.1   ¥9.9   ¥8.8   ¥3.9   ¥24.4 

Minimum

   6.7    1.5    4.3    1.4    14.5    11.7    6.6    1.9    2.5    15.6 

Daily average

   12.3    3.0    6.3    2.3    22.1    13.2    8.4    4.7    3.2    19.5 

At March 31, 2018

   11.3    4.3    4.3    3.2    21.5 

At March 31, 2021

   14.6    8.8    5.1    3.5    20.7 
  Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1)   Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1) 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

          

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

          

SMBC Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥19.2   ¥3.1   ¥5.3   ¥2.5   ¥22.6   ¥6.0   ¥9.6   ¥2.9   ¥4.7   ¥10.2 

Minimum

   1.5    1.0    0.3    1.2    3.9    3.7    4.0    0.0    2.6    6.2 

Daily average

   8.1    1.7    1.8    1.7    11.8    4.5    5.6    0.7    4.0    7.3 

At March 31, 2017

   1.9    1.2    0.4    1.7    3.9 

At March 31, 2020

   5.4    8.9    0.0    2.6    6.4 

SMFG Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥27.9   ¥3.9   ¥5.8   ¥2.5   ¥34.0   ¥13.7   ¥10.6   ¥9.4   ¥4.7   ¥22.4 

Minimum

   10.3    1.2    1.1    1.2    13.1    9.2    4.4    1.6    2.6    13.8 

Daily average

   16.1    1.9    3.1    1.7    21.4    10.6    6.2    3.7    4.0    16.7 

At March 31, 2017

   16.7    1.6    4.2    1.7    23.6 

At March 31, 2020

   12.6    9.5    2.4    2.6    16.2 

 

(1)

Total for “Maximum,” “Minimum,” and “Daily average” represent the maximum, minimum and daily average of the total of the trading book. For certain subsidiaries, we employ the standardized method and/or the historical simulation method for the VaR calculation method.

VaR forNon-trading Activity

 

  

Banking

 

  Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1)   Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1) 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

          

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

          

SMBC Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥31.5   ¥0.0   ¥39.9   ¥0.0   ¥54.5   ¥55.5   ¥0.6   ¥27.1   ¥0.0   ¥58.5 

Minimum

   25.2    0.0    21.5    0.0    38.0    43.1    0.0    7.5    0.0    45.5 

Daily average

   27.4    0.0    30.4    0.0    44.4    49.3    0.3    15.0    0.0    51.7 

At March 31, 2018

   31.3    0.0    28.1    0.0    45.7 

At March 31, 2021

   50.3    0.0    17.4    0.0    54.5 

SMFG Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥34.0   ¥0.0   ¥39.9   ¥0.0   ¥57.0   ¥56.1   ¥0.6   ¥27.1   ¥0.0   ¥59.0 

Minimum

   27.8    0.0    21.6    0.0    40.8    43.9    0.0    7.5    0.0    46.2 

Daily average

   30.2    0.0    30.5    0.0    47.2    49.9    0.3    15.0    0.0    52.3 

At March 31, 2018

   33.7    0.0    28.1    0.0    48.2 

At March 31, 2021

   50.8    0.0    17.4    0.0    55.0 
  Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1)   Interest rate
risk
   Foreign
exchange risk
   Equities and
commodities
risk
   Others   Total(1) 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

          

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

          

SMBC Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥34.2   ¥0.0   ¥38.9   ¥0.0   ¥49.9   ¥46.8   ¥0.0   ¥30.2   ¥0.0   ¥51.5 

Minimum

   23.2    0.0    24.7    0.0    37.8    32.7    0.0    10.8    0.0    35.6 

Daily average

   27.0    0.0    32.1    0.0    43.0    40.6    0.0    20.4    0.0    44.3 

At March 31, 2017

   27.4    0.0    34.2    0.0    44.1 

At March 31, 2020

   45.4    0.0    15.4    0.0    49.6 

SMFG Consolidated

                    

Maximum

  ¥37.3   ¥0.0   ¥38.9   ¥0.0   ¥53.2   ¥47.6   ¥0.0   ¥30.2   ¥0.0   ¥52.4 

Minimum

   26.4    0.0    24.8    0.0    40.2    33.6    0.0    10.8    0.0    36.5 

Daily average

   30.0    0.0    32.2    0.0    46.1    41.5    0.0    20.4    0.0    45.1 

At March 31, 2017

   30.6    0.0    34.3    0.0    47.4 

At March 31, 2020

   46.2    0.0    15.4    0.0    50.5 

 

(1)

Total for “Maximum,” “Minimum,” and “Daily average” represent the maximum, minimum and daily average of the total of the banking book.

  

Strategic EquityShareholding Investment

 

   Equities risk 
   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

  

SMBC Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,622.91,161.7 

Minimum

   1,309.8784.1 

Daily average

   1,456.6966.1 

At March 31, 20182021

   1,389.41,111.2 

SMFG Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,855.91,337.5 

Minimum

   1,488.1911.2 

Daily average

   1,664.21,122.2 

At March 31, 20182021

   1,603.61,284.1 
   Equities risk 
   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2020:

  

SMBC Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,421.01,030.0 

Minimum

   1,146.2717.4 

Daily average

   1,303.7941.3 

At March 31, 20172020

   1,361.8808.2 

SMFG Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,603.91,180.6 

Minimum

   1,272.8840.5 

Daily average

   1,460.51,092.7 

At March 31, 20172020

   1,544.5942.4 

Stress Tests

The market occasionally undergoes extreme fluctuations that exceed projections. Therefore, to manage market risk, it is important to run simulations of situations that may occur only once in many years, orso-called stress tests. To prepare for unexpected market swings, we perform stress tests on a monthly basis based on various scenarios.

The limitations of the VaR methodology include the following:

 

The use of historical data as a proxy for estimating future events may underestimate the probability of extreme market movements. Past market movement is not necessarily a good indicator of future events;

 

The use of a holding period assumes that all positions can be liquidated or hedged in that period of time. This assumption does not fully capture the market risk arising during periods of illiquidity, when liquidation or hedging in that period of time may not be possible;

 

The use of a confidence level neither takes account of, nor makes any statement about, any losses that might occur beyond this level of confidence; and

 

VaR does not capture all of the complex effects of the risk factors on the value of positions and portfolios and could underestimate potential losses.

Additional Information for Certain Risks

Interest Rate Risk

To supplement the above limitations of VaR methodologies, the SMBC Group adopts various indices to measure and monitor the sensitivity of interest rates, including delta, gamma and vega risks. The SMBC Group considers BPV as one of the most significant indices to manage interest rate risk. BPV is the amount of change in the value to the banking and trading book as a result of aone-basis-point (0.01%) movement in interest rates. The principal SMBC Group companies use BPV to monitor interest rate risk, not only on a net basis, but also by term to prevent the concentration of interest rate risk in a specific period. In addition, as previously addressed, the SMBC Group enhances the risk management methods of VaR and BPV by using them in combination with back-testing and stress tests.

Interest rate risk substantially changes depending on the method used for recognizing the expected maturity dates of demand deposits that can be withdrawn at any time or the method used for estimating the timing of cancellation prior to maturity of time deposits and consumer housing loans. At SMBC, the maturity of demand deposits that are expected to be left with SMBC for a prolonged period is regarded to be at the longest five years (2.5 years on average), and the cancellation prior to maturity of time deposits and consumer housing loans is estimated based on historical data.

Based on the standards for interest rate risk in the banking book issued by the BCBS in April 2016, the FSA revised the related regulatory guidelines pertaining to monitoring of interest rate risks in the banking book in December 2017. The revised disclosure requirements with respect to the changes in economic value of equity (“DEVE”) and changes in net interest income (“DNII”) in the banking book as a result of interest rate shocks have been applied from March 31, 2018. The tables below presentDEVE andDNII of SMBC and SMFG on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, respectively.

DEVE is defined as a decline in economic value as a result of an interest rate shock. It is calculated by multiplying the interest rate sensitivity (excluding credit spread) and interest rate change. The FSA implements a “materiality test” to identify banks taking excessive interest rate risks. Under the materiality test, the FSA monitors the ratio ofDEVE to Tier 1 capital based on a set of prescribed interest rate shock scenarios. The threshold applied by the FSA is 15% and the ratios for SMBC on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2021 and 2020 were 9.6% and 11.1%, respectively and those for SMFG on a consolidated basis at March 31, 20182021 and 2020 were 4.8%8.1% and 4.2%9.6%, respectively.

DNII is defined as a decline in interest income over a rolling12-month period as a result of an interest rate shock. It is calculated assuming a constant balance sheet over a forward-looking rolling12-month period.

 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 At March 31, 2020 
  DEVE   DNII   DEVE   DNII DEVE   DNII 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

SMBC Consolidated

           

Parallel shock up

  ¥450.8   ¥(298.9  ¥909.0   ¥(305.4 ¥982.1   ¥(242.6

Parallel shock down

   0.0    446.5    0.0    495.3  0.0    415.0 

Steepener shock

   234.6    —      279.1    —    284.9    —   

Flattener shock

   14.5    —      137.0    —    164.0    —   

Short rate shock up

   69.9    —      339.6    —    329.6    —   

Short rate shock down

   0.2    —      5.3    —    6.6    —   

Maximum

   450.8    446.5    909.0    495.3  982.1    415.0 

 

At March 31, 2018
(In billions)

Tier 1 Capital

¥9,423.7
   At March 31, 2021   At March 31, 2020 
   (In billions) 

Tier 1 Capital

  ¥  9,518.0   ¥  8,842.3 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 At March 31, 2020 
  DEVE   DNII   DEVE   DNII DEVE   DNII 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

SMFG Consolidated

           

Parallel shock up

  ¥450.8   ¥(298.9  ¥909.0   ¥(305.4 ¥982.1   ¥(242.6

Parallel shock down

   0.0    446.5    0.0    495.3  0.0    415.0 

Steepener shock

   234.6    —      279.1    —    284.9    —   

Flattener shock

   14.5    —      137.0    —    164.0    —   

Short rate shock up

   69.9    —      339.6    —    329.6    —   

Short rate shock down

   0.2    —      5.3    —    6.6    —   

Maximum

   450.8    446.5    909.0    495.3  982.1    415.0 

 

At March 31, 2018
(In billions)

Tier 1 Capital

¥10,610.2
   At March 31, 2021   At March 31, 2020 
   (In billions) 

Tier 1 Capital

  ¥11,199.3   ¥10,249.9 

 

Note:

DEVE andDNII are calculated by currency at SMBC consolidated level and the results are aggregated across the various currencies. ForDNII, only Japanese yen and U.S. dollars are included in the calculation. These are the material currencies where interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are more than 5% of total assets and liabilities. In addition,DEVE andDNII at March 31, 2017 are not disclosed because the calculation of them is not required for the regulatory purpose.

Under the related regulatory guidelines prior to the revisions pertaining to monitoring of interest rate risks in the banking book published by the FSA in December 2017, a bank would fall into the category of “outlier bank,” as stipulated under Pillar 2 of the Basel Capital Accord, in the event the economic value of a bank declines by more than 20% of total capital as a result of interest rate shocks. This ratio, known as the outlier ratio, was 1.5% for SMBC on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2017, substantially below the 20% criterion. The decline in economic value based on the outlier framework of SMBC on a consolidated basis is shown in the following table.

At March 31, 2017
(In billions, except
percentages)

SMBC Consolidated

Total

¥150.5

Impact of yen interest rates

77.2

Impact of U.S. dollar interest rates

50.8

Impact of euro interest rates

8.8

Percentage of total capital

1.5

Note:Decline in economic value is the decline of the present value of a banking portfolio after interest rate shocks (1st and 99th percentile of observed interest rate changes using aone-year holding period and an observation period of five years).

Foreign Exchange Risk

The principal SMBC Group companies set risk limits for each currency to manage the concentration of the foreign currency position. The foreign exchange risk is immaterial as shown above in VaR by risk category.

Strategic EquityShareholding Investment Risk

We establish limits on allowable risk for strategic equityshareholding investments, and monitor the observance of those limits to keep stock price fluctuation risk within acceptable parameters. We have been reducing our strategic equityshareholding investments, and the balance is within a permitted level, which is less than 100% of our consolidated Tier 1 Capital. See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Regulations in Japan—Regulations for Stabilizing the Financial System—Restriction on Aggregate Shareholdings by a Bank.”

Liquidity Risk Management Methods

We regard liquidity risk as one of the major risks. We manageOur liquidity risk management is based on a framework consisting of setting upper limits for “funding gaps,” maintaining high-quality liquid assets in line with the SMBC Group’s risk appetiteRisk Appetite Measures and establishing contingency plans.

A funding gapThe Risk Appetite Measures are measures for selecting the types and levels of risk that we are willing to take on or tolerate. As the level of liquidity risk is definedevaluated based on cash flow and balance sheet conditions, Risk Appetite Measures have been set for both of these areas. These measures include the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, a liquidity regulation, as well as a maturity mismatch between a sourcemeasure of fundsthe periods for which it will be possible to maintain funding levels even under stress due to deposit outflows or other factors, and the useratio which shows how much the stable funding covers the funding for loans and other assets.

The tolerated levels of funds. We actively manage thisrisk are set based on account funding gap by setting limitsstatus, cash management planning, economic environments and other factors, and measures are monitored on the size of gaps over a given time horizon and limitingdaily or monthly basis in order to limit reliance on short-term funding. Thesefunding and appropriately manage liquidity.

As a framework to complement the Risk Appetite Measures, upper limits are establishedset in place on both an SMBC Group company basis and individual branch basis taking into account cash management planning, systemic factors and funding status, among other factors. Additionally, funding gap limits are set for individual currencies if necessary. We actively monitorwith regard to funding gaps, which is defined as a maturity mismatch between the source of funds and use of funds.

Furthermore, contingency plans are established in preparation for emergency situations. These plans contain information on a daily basis. Further, stress tests are regularly carriedchains of command and lines of reporting as well as detailed action plans depending on the existing situation (i.e., normal, concerned, or crisis). Meanwhile, SMBC carries out by simulating the impact triggered, for example, by the outflowquantitative management of deposits or having difficulties in funding from money markets, in order to thoroughly comprehend the amount required to fund when the liquidity risk is realized. We also monitor quantitative indicators of the levels of risk exposure to be assumed, such as Liquidity Coverage Ratio. In addition, SMBC, the SMBC Group’s major banking subsidiary, establishes quantitative alert systemindications based on early warning indicators established to detect liquidity risksassist the bank in promptly and systematically. Additionally, fundingsystematically detecting liquidity is maintained by holding assets, such as central bank reserves and government bonds which can be immediately converted to cash, in line with the SMBC Group’s risk appetite, in order to smoothly raise the required funds even during market disruption.

Furthermore, contingency plans are developed at each SMBC Group company to respond to the liquidity risk when being realized, by creating detailed action plans such as lowering the upper limit for the funding gap, depending on the existing situation (i.e. normal, concerned, or critical) and the respective circumstances.risks.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is the possibility of losses arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Specifically, it covers processing risk, system risk, legal risk, human resources risk, reputational risk, and tangible asset risk and third party risk. We have prepared operational risk management regulations to define the basic rules to be observed across SMBC Group. Under these regulations, we are working to raise the level of sophistication of our management of operational risk across the SMBC Group by providing an effective framework for the identification, assessment, control and monitoring of significant risk factors and by establishing a system for executing contingency and business continuity plans.

Processing risk is the possibility of losses arising from negligent processing by directors and employees, and from accidents or misconducts. We have clarified the divisions responsible for the oversight functions for processing risk management, and we are working to raise the level of sophistication of our management of processing risk across the whole SMBC Group by establishing systems for managing the processing risks faced by SMBC Group companies, ensuringin-office inspection, minimizing losses in the event of processing risk materialization by drafting exhaustive contingency plans, and carrying out thorough quantification of the risk under management as basic principles.

System risk is the possibility of a lossrisk arising from nonconformity to the business strategies,management strategy, inappropriate technologies applied, changes to the development plan and delay in development when building an information system, and the risk of loss incurred due to the breakdown including those caused by cyberattack,system failure, malfunction, deficiency or unauthorized use (unauthorized alteration, destruction, duplication and leakage of the information)., including those caused by cyber-attack. We have set the following as basic principles: recognizing information systems as an essential part of management strategy taking into account advances in IT, minimizing system risk by drafting regulations and specific management standards, (including a security policy) and establishing contingency plans to minimize losses if a system risk materializes.

Conduct Risk

Conduct risk is the risk that our conduct negatively affects customers, market integrity, effective competition, public interests, and the SMBC Group’s stakeholders, through acts that violate laws and regulations or social norms. SMBC Group’s fundamental stance is that its business is not to negatively affect customers, market integrity, effective competition, public interests, and stakeholders. Efforts are being made to improve group-wide conduct risk management. Focuses of these efforts include preemptively identifying phenomena with the potential to cause significant deterioration in the trust of the SMBC Group and preventing the materialization of serious management risks by being keenly responsive to environmental changes.

Item 12.

Description of Securities other than Equity Securities

12.A.    DEBT SECURITIES

Not applicable.

12.B.    WARRANTS AND RIGHTS

Not applicable.

12.C.    OTHER SECURITIES

Not applicable.

12.D.    AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES

Under the terms of the deposit agreement, an ADS holder may have to pay the following service fees to the depositary:

 

Service

  

Fees

Issuance of ADSs

  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS issued

Cancellation of ADSs

  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS canceled

Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions

  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS held
Distribution of ADSs pursuant to stock dividends, free stock distributions or exercises of rights  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS held
Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS held

Depositary services

  Up to U.S. 5¢ per ADS held on the applicable record date(s) established by the depositary

An ADS holder will also be responsible for paying certain fees and expenses incurred by the depositary and certain taxes and governmental charges such as:

 

taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) and other governmental charges;

 

the registration fees applicable to transfers of shares or other deposited securities to or from the name of the custodian, the depositary or any nominees upon the making of deposits or withdrawals, respectively;

 

the cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery expenses expressly provided in the deposit agreement to be at the expense of the person depositing or withdrawing shares or holders and beneficial owners of ADSs;

the expenses and charges incurred by the depositary in the conversion of foreign currency;

 

the fees and expenses incurred by the depositary in connection with compliance with exchange control regulations and other regulatory requirements applicable to shares, deposited securities, ADSs and ADRs; and

 

the fees and expenses incurred by the depositary, the custodian or any nominee in connection with the servicing or delivery of deposited securities.

Depositary fees payable upon the issuance and cancellation of ADSs are typically paid to the depositary by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) receiving the newly issued ADSs from the depositary and by the brokers (on behalf of their clients) delivering the ADSs to the depositary for cancellation. The brokers in turn charge these transaction fees to their clients.

Citibank, N.A., as depositary, has agreed to reimburse the Company for certain expenses the Company incurs in connection with its ADR program, subject to certain ceilings. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, we received $525,000.00$2,275,000.00 as reimbursement for such expenses.expenses, which includes additional reimbursement upon the renewal of our depositary appointment.

PART II

 

Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

None.

 

Item 14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

None.

 

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Takeshi Kunibe, our Director President, and Jun Ohta, our Director Deputy President and Group Chief Executive Officer, and Toru Nakashima, our Senior Managing Corporate Executive Officer and Group Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) at March 31, 2018.2021. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their control objectives. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based upon the evaluation referred to above, Mr. KunibeOhta and Mr. OhtaNakashima concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures at March 31, 20182021 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

 (i)

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

 (ii)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

 

 (iii)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 20182021 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 2018.2021.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 20182021 has been audited by KPMG AZSA, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on pageF-4.the “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” included in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Although we have implemented various initiatives for continuous business operation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including enabling most of our employees to telework, apart from those who need to work at their office for smooth operations, we believe these initiatives have not had a significant impact on our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 16A.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Shozo Yamazaki is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form20-F and is “independent” as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE.

 

Item 16B.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, which is comprised of internal rules included in our business ethics and compliance manual, each of which applies to all our directors, officers and other employees.

On December 27, 2017, with the purpose of enhancing our risk management structure, including compliance, we revised our previous internal rules and established “Principles of Action on Compliance and Risk” and “Policies on Compliance Management.”

A copy of the sections of our business ethics and compliance manual equivalent to the “code of ethics” (as defined in paragraph (b) of Item 16B of Form20-F) is attached as Exhibit 11 to this annual report.

There were no material changes to our internal compliance rules during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. No waivers of the business ethics and compliance manual have been granted to any of our directors, officers or other employees, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021.

 

Item 16C.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Fees for Services Provided by KPMG AZSA and its Affiliates

The aggregate fees billed by KPMG AZSA, our independent registered public accounting firm, and its affiliates, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 are presented in the following table:

 

  For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Audit fees(1)

  ¥5,275   ¥4,764   ¥5,736   ¥5,352 

Audit-related fees(2)

   227    206    281    292 

Tax fees(3)

   190    148    40    57 

All other fees(4)

   90    58    27    35 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥5,782   ¥5,176   ¥6,084   ¥5,736 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Audit fees primarily include fees for the audit of our and our subsidiaries’ annual financial statements and fees for the services that are normally provided in connection with our statutory and regulatory filings.

(2)

Audit-related fees primarily include fees for attestation and related services that are not reported under audit fees.

(3)

Tax fees primarily include fees for tax compliance, assistance with preparation of tax return filings and tax advisory services.

(4)

All other fees include fees for advisory servicesa gap analysis on regulatory requirements and industry practices in relation to consideration of examining the effectiveness of subsidiaries’ internal audit systems.foreign securities markets.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule2-01(c)(7) of RegulationS-X, our audit committeepre-approves all engagements with KPMG AZSA and its affiliates. Under the policies and procedures established by our audit committee, the Company and its subsidiaries must apply to our audit committee forpre-approval on either a periodic basis twice a year for services expected to be performed in the coming months orcase-by-case basis before entering into the engagement with KPMG AZSA and its affiliates to perform audit and permittednon-audit services.

Pre-approval is granted by our audit committee prior to entering into the engagement. Additionally, if necessary, full-time audit committee members may consider anycase-by-case application forpre-approval on behalf of our audit committee prior to the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Suchpre-approvals made by full-time audit committee members are reported to our audit committee at the next scheduled audit committee meeting.

Fees approved pursuant to the procedures described in paragraph2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of RegulationS-X, which provides for an exception to the general requirement forpre-approval in certain circumstances, were none for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

Item 16D.

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for the Audit Committee

Not applicable.

We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. In order to further enhance our solid corporate governance system, we transitioned to a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee, on June 29, 2017. For further information, see “Item 6.C. Board Practices.”

 

Item 16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table sets forth purchases of our common stock by us and our affiliated purchasers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

 

  Total number of
shares purchased(1)
  Average price
paid per share
  Total number of
shares purchased
as part of

publicly
announced plans
or programs
  Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans

or programs
 

April 1 to April 30, 2017

  1,446  ¥3,931   —     —   

May 1 to May 31, 2017

  1,463   4,145   —     —   

June 1 to June 30, 2017

  1,813   4,162   —     —   

July 1 to July 31, 2017

  2,675   4,313   —     —   

August 1 to August 31, 2017

  2,919   4,171   —     —   

September 1 to September 30, 2017

  2,596   4,153   —     —   

October 1 to October 31, 2017

  3,146   4,360   —     —   

November 1 to November 30, 2017

  2,403   4,512   —     —   

December 1 to December 31, 2017

  4,749   4,785   —     —   

January 1 to January 31, 2018

  4,046   5,164   —     —   

February 1 to February 28, 2018

  2,363   4,843   —     —   

March 1 to March 31, 2018

  1,935   4,615   —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  31,554  ¥4,511   —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Total number of
shares purchased(1)(2)
   Average price
paid per share
   Total number of
shares purchased
as part of
publicly
announced plans
or programs
   Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans
or programs
 

April 1 to April 30, 2020

   914   ¥2,649    —      —   

May 1 to May 31, 2020

   450    2,808    —      —   

June 1 to June 30, 2020

   754    3,147    —      —   

July 1 to July 31, 2020

   1,739    3,043    —      —   

August 1 to August 31, 2020

   1,474    2,963    —      —   

September 1 to September 30, 2020

   1,702    3,107    —      —   

October 1 to October 31, 2020

   1,337    2,988    —      —   

November 1 to November 30, 2020

   955    3,059    —      —   

December 1 to December 31, 2020

   2,380    3,122    —      —   

January 1 to January 31, 2021

   2,141    3,346    —      —   

February 1 to February 28, 2021

   2,187    3,528    —      —   

March 1 to March 31, 2021

   2,932    3,970    —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   18,965   ¥3,262    —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

A total of 31,55418,965 shares were purchased other than through a publicly announced plan or program during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, due to our purchases of shares constituting less than one unit from registered holders of such shares at the current market prices of those shares.

On May 14, 2018, we announced that our board of directors resolved to repurchase shares of our common stock and cancel all the repurchased shares. The resolution authorized the repurchase of up to the lesser of (i) an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of our common stock and (ii) an aggregate of ¥70 billion between May 15, 2018 and July 31, 2018. On June 19, 2018, we completed the repurchase, acquiring 15,368,300 shares of our common stock for ¥70 billion in aggregate. The cancellation of all the repurchased shares is scheduled on August 20, 2018.
(2)

Pursuant to our stock compensation plans utilizing restricted stock for executives, after the expiration of applicable time periods, a certain amount of the shares initially allotted to executives are released from transfer restrictions. We retrieve the allotted but unreleased shares from the executives at nil cost. See “Item 6.E. Share Ownership.” A total of 38,953 shares were retrieved from executives at nil cost during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, and are excluded from total number of shares purchased in this table.

 

Item 16F.

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

None.

Item 16G.

Corporate Governance

Companies listed on the NYSE must comply with certain corporate governance standards provided under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. However, NYSE-listed companies that are foreign private issuers, including us, are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A if such foreign private issuers meet certain criteria. We rely on the exemption for home country practices concerning the listing of our ADSs on the NYSE.

Under the Companies Act, we are required to have a corporate governance system with (i) a board of corporate auditors, (ii) an audit and supervisory committee, or (iii) three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee. We had previously employed a board of corporate auditors governance system. On June 29, 2017, we transitioned tohave adopted a company with three statutory committees following approval at our ordinary general meetingsystem of shareholders.corporate governance.

Foreign private issuers listed on the NYSE are required to provide to their U.S. investors a brief, general summary of the significant differences of corporate governance practices that differ from U.S. companies under NYSE listing standards. The following is a summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from NYSE standards followed by U.S. companies:

 

U.S. companies listed on the NYSE are required to have a majority of directors that meet the independence requirements under Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual. Under the Companies Act, we are required to have three statutory committees consisting of members of our board of directors, of which the majority must be outside directors. Currently, seven of our seventeenfifteen directors are outside directors who meet the requirements under the Companies Act.

 

U.S. companies listed on the NYSE are required to have an audit committee composed entirely of independent directors. Under the Companies Act, we are required to have an audit committee that consists of three or more members of our board of directors, of which the majority must be outside directors. Currently, three of the five members of our audit committee are outside directors that meet the requirements under the Companies Act. Our audit committee satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, including the independence requirements thereunder.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company is required to have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, all of which must be composed entirely of independent directors. The members of the compensation committee must satisfy additional requirements set forth in Section 303A.02(a)(ii) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. A compensation committee must also have the authority to, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other adviser. This authority is subject to the committee’s consideration of certain criteria set forth in Section 303A.05(c) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual regarding the independence of the adviser. Under the Companies Act, we are required to establish a nominating committee and a compensation committee, each of which consisting of at least three directors and of which the majority of the members must be outside directors. Currently, five of the six members of our nominating committee and four of the six members of compensation committee are outside directors who meet the requirements under the Companies Act.

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must hold regularly scheduled executive sessions where participants are limited to non-management directors. Under the Companies Act, Japanese corporations are not obliged to hold executive sessions where participants are limited to non-management directors.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must adopt a code of business conduct and ethics and must post the code on its website. While we are not required to adopt such code under Japanese law or the rules of stock exchanges in Japan on which we are listed, we maintain our code of conduct and ethics as our standard for corporate conduct to be observed by our directors, officers and employees.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must adopt corporate governance guidelines and must post the guidelines on its website. While we are not required to adopt such guidelines under Japanese law, the rules of the stock exchanges in Japan on which we are listed, including the Tokyo Stock Exchange, require listed companies, including us, to comply with the principles of the Corporate Governance Code established by those stock exchanges and, in cases of noncompliance with some or all of the principles, to disclose the reasons for such noncompliance. We established the SMFG Corporate

Governance Guideline, in consideration of the Corporate Governance Code, to present our basic views and guidelines on corporate governance and improve our corporate governance system. The SMFG Corporate Governance Guideline is available on our website (the contents of which are not incorporated by reference in this annual report).

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must hold regularly scheduled executive sessions where participants are limited to non-management directors. While we are not required to hold such sessions under the Companies Act, the SMFG Corporate Governance Guideline provides that our outside directors, who are neither executive directors, executive corporate officers nor employees, will endeavor to exchange information and develop a shared awareness among them regarding matters relating to the corporate governance and improve our corporate governance system. Ourbusiness of SMBC Group from an independent and objective standpoint. The SMFG Corporate Governance Guideline is available on our website at http://www.smfg.co.jp.further provides, as a concrete way of exchanging information and developing this shared awareness, that outside directors may hold meetings that only outside directors may attend, as necessary.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must generally obtain shareholder approval with respect to any equity compensation plan, subject to limited exemptions. Under the Companies Act, companies with three statutory committees such as us are not required to obtain shareholder approval with respect to equity compensation plans. In this case, the compensation committee is required to establish policies in regard to the determination of the compensation of the directors and corporate executive officers, including stock compensation plans that utilize restricted stock, and determines the contents of compensation of the individual directors and corporate executive officers in accordance with such policies. For details of the equity compensation plan introduced by us, see “Item 6.E. Share Ownership.”

 

Item 16H.

Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART III

 

Item 17.

Financial Statements

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of this item.

 

Item 18.

Financial Statements

The information required by this item is set forth in our consolidated financial statements starting on pageF-1 of this annual report.

 

Item 19.

Exhibits

We have filed the following documents as exhibits to this document:

 

Exhibit 1.1  Articles of Incorporation of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., as amended on June  29, 2017, incorporated by reference from our registration statementannual report on Form20-F (Commission file number001-34919) filed on June 29, 2017
Exhibit 1.2  Regulations of the Board of Directors of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., as amended on June 29, 2017, incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form20-F (Commission file number001-34919) filed on June 29, 2017March 1, 2021
Exhibit 1.3  Share Handling Regulations of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., as amended on June  29, 2017, incorporated by reference from our registration statementannual report on Form20-F (Commission file number001-34919) filed on June 29, 2017
Exhibit 2.1  Form of Deposit Agreement among the registrant, Citibank, N.A., as Depositary, and all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder, incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form20-F (Commission file number001-34919) filed on October 20, 2010
Exhibit 2.2Description of our common stock, incorporated by reference from “Item 10.B Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation” of this annual report
Exhibit 2.3Description of our American Depositary Shares, incorporated by reference from “Item  12.D American Depositary Shares” of our registration statement on Form 20-F (Commission file number 001-34919) filed on October 20, 2010
Exhibit 8  List of subsidiaries of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., at March 31, 20182021
Exhibit 11  Code of Ethics of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., as amended on April  1, 2020, incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 20-F (Commission file number 001-34919) filed on June 22, 201826, 2020
Exhibit 12.1  CEO Certification Required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a))
Exhibit 12.2  CFO Certification Required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a))
Exhibit 13.1  Certification Required by Rule13a-14(b) (17 CFR240.13a-14(b)) and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Exhibit 13.2  Certification Required by Rule13a-14(b) (17 CFR240.13a-14(b)) and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 101. INS  XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101. SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

Exhibit 101. CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
Exhibit 101. DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
Exhibit 101. LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
Exhibit 101. PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

We have not included as exhibits certain instruments with respect to our long-term debt. The total amount of our long-term debt securities or that of our subsidiaries, authorized under any instrument does not exceed 10% of our total assets. We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt or that of our subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
By: 

  /s/ Takeshi KunibeJun Ohta

 Name: Takeshi KunibeJun Ohta
 Title: President and Group Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 28, 201829, 2021

SELECTED STATISTICAL DATA

 

I.

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential

Average Statements of Financial Positions, Interest and Average Rates

The following tables show the average balances of our statement of financial positions items and related interest and average interest rates for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019. Average balances are generally based on a daily average. Weekly,month-end orquarter-end averages are used for certain average balances where it is not practical to obtain the applicable daily averages. The average balances determined by such methods are considered to be representative of our operations. The allocation of amounts between domestic and foreign is based on the location of the office.

 

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
 Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
  Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
income
 Average
rate
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Interest-earning assets:

                  

Interest-earning deposits with other banks:

                  

Domestic offices

 ¥       848,242  ¥       4,536  0.53%  ¥       762,460  ¥       4,099  0.54%  ¥       768,976  ¥       4,771  0.62%  ¥881,007  ¥2,260  0.26 ¥1,061,849  ¥3,099  0.29 ¥997,310  ¥3,573  0.36

Foreign offices

 4,873,905  73,681  1.51%  4,617,409  41,671  0.90%  5,786,836  35,701  0.62%  4,701,633  15,151  0.32 3,994,229  78,493  1.97 4,696,278  100,225  2.13
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 5,722,147  78,217  1.37%  5,379,869  45,770  0.85%  6,555,812  40,472  0.62%  5,582,640  17,411  0.31 5,056,078  81,592  1.61 5,693,588  103,798  1.82
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Call loans and bills bought:

         

Call loans and bills bought, reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

         

Domestic offices

 81,336  412  0.51%  76,227  467  0.61%  147,992  861  0.58%  9,256,043  (687 (0.01%)  9,167,833  17,540  0.19 8,829,374  14,879  0.17

Foreign offices

 1,730,409  18,950  1.10%  1,303,429  11,598  0.89%  967,442  20,967  2.17%  3,224,164  25,926  0.80 3,032,754  51,881  1.71 3,138,663  39,908  1.27
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 1,811,745  19,362  1.07%  1,379,656  12,065  0.87%  1,115,434  21,828  1.96%  12,480,207  25,239  0.20 12,200,587  69,421  0.57 11,968,037  54,787  0.46
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

         

Trading assets(1) and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss(2):

         

Domestic offices

 8,120,363  14,563  0.18%  7,443,668  12,151  0.16%  6,675,810  10,763  0.16%  2,486,686  8,450  0.34 3,724,806  14,737  0.40 4,110,955  20,240  0.49

Foreign offices

 1,222,180  25,458  2.08%  1,009,997  17,450  1.73%  741,623  11,248  1.52%  258,547  3,863  1.49 352,514  6,641  1.88 367,638  6,178  1.68
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 9,342,543  40,021  0.43%  8,453,665  29,601  0.35%  7,417,433  22,011  0.30%  2,745,233  12,313  0.45 4,077,320  21,378  0.52 4,478,593  26,418  0.59
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Trading assets(1):

         

Domestic offices

 2,565,770  1,943  0.08%  2,835,336  8,751  0.31%  3,500,759  21,259  0.61% 

Foreign offices

 176,888  2,857  1.62%  119,777  1,869  1.56%  85,204  1,240  1.46% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 2,742,658  4,800  0.18%  2,955,113  10,620  0.36%  3,585,963  22,499  0.63% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss(2):

         

Domestic offices

 1,564,439  (23 (0.00%)  1,582,142   —    0.00%  1,629,644  4,425  0.27% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Held-to-maturity investments(3):

         

Domestic offices

 784,339  3,244  0.41%  1,809,777  6,756  0.37%  2,964,539  12,880  0.43% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Available-for-sale financial assets(3):

         

Investment securities(3):

         

Domestic offices

 9,799,861  44,053  0.45%  7,477,480  41,561  0.56%  10,878,176  38,701  0.36%  16,642,148  46,384  0.28 11,245,654  75,026  0.67 8,977,937  65,854  0.73

Foreign offices

 3,406,370  54,998  1.61%  2,945,084  39,031  1.33%  2,425,249  33,331  1.37%  5,385,436  80,255  1.49 4,832,026  103,804  2.15 4,258,283  87,061  2.04
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 13,206,231  99,051  0.75%  10,422,564  80,592  0.77%  13,303,425  72,032  0.54%  22,027,584  126,639  0.57 16,077,680  178,830  1.11 13,236,220  152,915  1.16
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Loans and advances(4):

                  

Domestic offices

 68,551,116  1,093,584  1.60%  66,948,344  1,082,058  1.62%  63,177,259  1,091,538  1.73%  64,651,076  846,911  1.31 60,498,334  937,419  1.55 60,973,779  1,007,977  1.65

Foreign offices

 28,121,904  810,591  2.88%  25,298,515  643,419  2.54%  26,272,983  611,823  2.33%  32,230,777  764,170  2.37 31,467,410  1,139,783  3.62 29,646,844  1,086,873  3.67
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 96,673,020  1,904,175  1.97%  92,246,859  1,725,477  1.87%  89,450,242  1,703,361  1.90%  96,881,853  1,611,081  1.66 91,965,744  2,077,202  2.26 90,620,623  2,094,850  2.31
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-earning assets:

                  

Domestic offices

 92,315,466  1,162,312  1.26%  88,935,434  1,155,843  1.30%  89,743,155  1,185,198  1.32%  93,916,960  903,318  0.96 85,698,476  1,047,821  1.22 83,889,355  1,112,523  1.33

Foreign offices

 39,531,656  986,535  2.50%  35,294,211  755,038  2.14%  36,279,337  714,310  1.97%  45,800,557  889,365  1.94 43,678,933  1,380,602  3.16 42,107,706  1,320,245  3.14
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 131,847,122  ¥2,148,847  1.63%  124,229,645  ¥1,910,881  1.54%  126,022,492  ¥1,899,508  1.51%  139,717,517  ¥1,792,683  1.28 129,377,409  ¥2,428,423  1.88 125,997,061  ¥2,432,768  1.93
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Non-interest-earning assets:

                  

Cash and due from banks

 47,107,953    37,551,682    32,203,057    60,043,692    54,559,835    49,068,465   

Othernon-interest-earning assets

 21,130,470    20,498,864    20,359,043    19,995,576    18,351,183    19,893,981   

Allowance for loan losses

 (653,162   (676,296   (778,386   (764,695   (616,134   (644,019  
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Totalnon-interest-earning assets

 67,585,261    57,374,250    51,783,714    79,274,573    72,294,884    68,318,427   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total assets

 ¥199,432,383    ¥181,603,895    ¥177,806,206    ¥218,992,090    ¥201,672,293    ¥194,315,488   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total assets attributable to foreign offices

 23.9   23.4   24.5   25.0   25.8   25.5  

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
  Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                  

Deposits:

                  

Domestic offices

 ¥  87,138,742  ¥     44,941  0.05%  ¥  82,738,015  ¥     35,881  0.04%  ¥  78,458,170  ¥     48,032  0.06%  ¥91,029,016  ¥16,601  0.02%  ¥85,668,767  ¥51,976  0.06%  ¥83,791,727  ¥59,234  0.07% 

Foreign offices

 25,413,734  337,812  1.33%  23,383,002  213,147  0.91%  22,838,530  154,280  0.68%  28,285,386  163,309  0.58%  27,197,901  530,823  1.95%  27,283,476  542,131  1.99% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 112,552,476  382,753  0.34%  106,121,017  249,028  0.23%  101,296,700  202,312  0.20%  119,314,402  179,910  0.15%  112,866,668  582,799  0.52%  111,075,203  601,365  0.54% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Call money and bills sold:

         

Domestic offices

 845,376  302  0.04%  603,065  92  0.02%  2,199,407  1,524  0.07% 

Foreign offices

 801,565  8,461  1.06%  618,949  5,194  0.84%  663,310  4,059  0.61% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 1,646,941  8,763  0.53%  1,222,014  5,286  0.43%  2,862,717  5,583  0.20% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

         

Call money and bills sold, repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent and other interest-bearing liabilities:

         

Domestic offices

 10,015,944  16,774  0.17%  7,149,638  5,616  0.08%  7,172,312  8,582  0.12%  11,074,484  (5,172 (0.05% 11,218,806  33,745  0.30%  8,115,332  39,636  0.49% 

Foreign offices

 4,205,510  44,567  1.06%  3,081,806  15,007  0.49%  2,009,593  6,523  0.32%  4,524,797  14,865  0.33%  5,063,872  112,479  2.22%  4,610,162  97,606  2.12% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 14,221,454  61,341  0.43%  10,231,444  20,623  0.20%  9,181,905  15,105  0.16%  15,599,281  9,693  0.06%  16,282,678  146,224  0.90%  12,725,494  137,242  1.08% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Trading liabilities(1):

                  

Domestic offices

 1,719,417  13,617  0.79%  2,018,747  20,532  1.02%  1,764,784  23,772  1.35% 

Foreign offices

 99,055  1,044  1.05%  96,575  2,810  2.91%  106,563  2,770  2.60% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 1,818,472  14,661  0.81%  2,115,322  23,342  1.10%  1,871,347  26,542  1.42% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss(2):

         

Domestic offices

 2,038,711  6,086  0.30%  2,015,061  10,839  0.54%  2,243,856  17,241  0.77%  8,630  (293 (3.40%  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Foreign offices

 77,691  1,922  2.47%  52,065  616  1.18%  25,565  483  1.89%  64,547  6,364  9.86%   —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 2,116,402  8,008  0.38%  2,067,126  11,455  0.55%  2,269,421  17,724  0.78%  73,177  6,071  8.30%   —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Borrowings:

                  

Domestic offices

 11,331,752  61,460  0.54%  8,113,368  58,772  0.72%  10,251,890  56,353  0.55%  17,075,586  40,483  0.24%  11,958,700  61,238  0.51%  10,787,234  73,299  0.68% 

Foreign offices

 983,616  27,736  2.82%  847,353  21,063  2.49%  823,446  15,850  1.92%  599,476  22,141  3.69%  600,321  31,187  5.20%  977,662  33,934  3.47% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 12,315,368  89,196  0.72%  8,960,721  79,835  0.89%  11,075,336  72,203  0.65%  17,675,062  62,624  0.35%  12,559,021  92,425  0.74%  11,764,896  107,233  0.91% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Debt securities in issue:

                  

Domestic offices

 9,298,368  166,769  1.79%  8,320,124  130,613  1.57%  7,999,705  120,285  1.50%  9,764,667  100,987  1.03%  9,419,223  197,749  2.10%  9,880,220  203,423  2.06% 

Foreign offices

 2,180,438  24,005  1.10%  2,193,406  16,324  0.74%  3,044,714  14,887  0.49%  1,678,663  8,218  0.49%  1,883,920  34,724  1.84%  2,698,608  52,612  1.95% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 11,478,806  190,774  1.66%  10,513,530  146,937  1.40%  11,044,419  135,172  1.22%  11,443,330  109,205  0.95%  11,303,143  232,473  2.06%  12,578,828  256,035  2.04% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Other interest-bearing liabilities:

         

Premiums for deposit insurance:

         

Domestic offices

 102,683  524  0.51%  95,660  579  0.61%  93,104  676  0.73%   —    34,192   —     —    34,866   —     —    34,387   —   

Foreign offices

 23,466  618  2.63%  3,531  50  1.42%  1,960  50  2.55%   —    1,621   —     —    1,943   —     —    1,168   —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 126,149  1,142  0.91%  99,191  629  0.63%  95,064  726  0.76%   —    35,813   —     —    36,809   —     —    35,555   —   
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities:

                  

Domestic offices

 120,771,576  296,856  0.25%  109,034,931  242,392  0.22%  108,418,444  252,693  0.23%  130,671,800  200,415  0.15%  120,284,243  400,106  0.33%  114,339,297  433,751  0.38% 

Foreign offices

 33,686,020  445,121  1.32%  30,180,112  271,401  0.90%  29,407,118  196,132  0.67%  35,251,924  217,562  0.62%  34,842,589  713,966  2.05%  35,676,471  730,221  2.05% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

 154,457,596  ¥   741,977  0.48%  139,215,043  ¥   513,793  0.37%  137,825,562  ¥   448,825  0.33%  165,923,724  ¥417,977  0.25%  155,126,832  ¥1,114,072  0.72%  150,015,768  ¥1,163,972  0.78% 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

                  

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

 19,997,470    17,736,696    14,715,274    27,006,450    22,833,077    21,058,921   

Othernon-interest-bearing liabilities

 11,490,957    12,230,267    12,999,027    14,142,331    12,095,455    11,429,942   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Totalnon-interest-bearing liabilities

 31,488,427    29,966,963    27,714,301    41,148,781    34,928,532    32,488,863   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total equity

 13,486,360    12,421,889    12,266,343    11,919,585    11,616,929    11,810,857   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total equity and liabilities

 ¥199,432,383    ¥181,603,895    ¥177,806,206    ¥218,992,090    ¥201,672,293    ¥194,315,488   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total liabilities attributable to foreign offices

 20.2   20.2   20.5   19.8   20.8   21.8  

Net interest income and interest rate spread

  ¥1,406,870  1.15%   ¥1,397,088  1.17%   ¥1,450,683  1.18%   ¥1,374,706  1.03%   ¥1,314,351  1.16%   ¥1,268,796  1.15% 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net interest income as a percentage of total interest-earning assets

   1.07%    1.12%    1.15%    0.98%    1.02%    1.01% 
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

 

(1)

The net amount of interest income on trading assets and interest expense on trading liabilities is reported as net trading income in our consolidated income statement.

(2)

Interest income and expense on financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss isare reported in net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss in our consolidated income statement.

(3)

Taxable investment securities andnon-taxable investment securities are not disclosed separately because the aggregate effect of these average balances and interest income would not be material. In addition, the yields ontax-exempt obligations have not been calculated on a tax equivalent basis because the effect of such calculation would not be material.

(4)

Loans and advances include impaired loans and advances. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees is included in interest income on loans and advances.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

The following tables show the changes to our net interest income attributable to changes in the volume and changes in the rates for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2019.

Changes attributable to the combined impact of changes in the rates and the volume have been allocated proportionately to the changes in the volume and changes in the rates.

 

 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
Increase / (decrease)
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
Increase / (decrease)
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2021
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
Increase / (decrease)
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2019
Increase / (decrease)
 
 Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change   Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest income:

             

Interest-earning deposits with other banks:

             

Domestic offices

 ¥456  ¥(19 ¥437  ¥(40 ¥(632 ¥(672  ¥(491 ¥(348 ¥(839 ¥221  ¥(695 ¥(474

Foreign offices

 2,427  29,583  32,010  (8,263 14,233  5,970    11,899  (75,241 (63,342 (14,206 (7,526 (21,732
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 2,883  29,564  32,447  (8,303 13,601  5,298    11,408  (75,589 (64,181 (13,985 (8,221 (22,206
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Call loans and bills bought:

      

Call loans and bills bought, reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

       

Domestic offices

 30  (85 (55 (436 42  (394   166  (18,393 (18,227 592  2,069  2,661 

Foreign offices

 4,321  3,031  7,352  5,697  (15,066 (9,369   3,088  (29,043 (25,955 (1,386 13,359  11,973 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 4,351  2,946  7,297  5,261  (15,024 (9,763   3,254  (47,436 (44,182 (794 15,428  14,634 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed:

      

Trading assets(1) and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss(2):

       

Domestic offices

 1,140  1,272  2,412  1,229  159  1,388    (4,441 (1,846 (6,287 (1,775 (3,728 (5,503

Foreign offices

 4,049  3,959  8,008  4,487  1,715  6,202    (1,560 (1,218 (2,778 (262 725  463 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 5,189  5,231  10,420  5,716  1,874  7,590    (6,001 (3,064 (9,065 (2,037 (3,003 (5,040
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Trading assets(1):

      

Domestic offices

 (765 (6,043 (6,808 (3,503 (9,005 (12,508

Foreign offices

 923  65  988  534  95  629 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 158  (5,978 (5,820 (2,969 (8,910 (11,879
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss(2):

      

Domestic offices

 (23  —    (23 (125 (4,300 (4,425
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity investments:

      

Domestic offices

 (4,139 627  (3,512 (4,455 (1,669 (6,124
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

      

Investment securities:

       

Domestic offices

 11,440  (8,948 2,492  (14,692 17,552  2,860    26,646  (55,288 (28,642 15,528  (6,356 9,172 

Foreign offices

 6,686  9,281  15,967  6,939  (1,239 5,700    10,906  (34,455 (23,549 12,155  4,588  16,743 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 18,126  333  18,459  (7,753 16,313  8,560    37,552  (89,743 (52,191 27,683  (1,768 25,915 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans and advances:

             

Domestic offices

 25,753  (14,227 11,526  63,231  (72,711 (9,480   61,306  (151,814 (90,508 (7,791 (62,767 (70,558

Foreign offices

 76,079  91,093  167,172  (23,302 54,898  31,596    27,008  (402,621 (375,613 66,070  (13,160 52,910 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 101,832  76,866  178,698  39,929  (17,813 22,116    88,314  (554,435 (466,121 58,279  (75,927 (17,648
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest income:

             

Domestic offices

 33,892  (27,423 6,469  41,209  (70,564 (29,355   83,186  (227,689 (144,503 6,775  (71,477 (64,702

Foreign offices

 94,485  137,012  231,497  (13,908 54,636  40,728    51,341  (542,578 (491,237 62,371  (2,014 60,357 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥128,377  ¥109,589  ¥237,966  ¥27,301  ¥(15,928 ¥11,373   ¥134,527  ¥(770,267 ¥(635,740 ¥69,146  ¥(73,491 ¥(4,345
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
Increase / (decrease)
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
Increase / (decrease)
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2021
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
Increase / (decrease)
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2020
compared to
fiscal year ended March 31, 2019
Increase / (decrease)
 
 Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change   Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest expense:

             

Deposits:

             

Domestic offices

 ¥1,837  ¥7,223  ¥9,060  ¥2,448  ¥(14,599 ¥(12,151  ¥3,032  ¥(38,407 ¥(35,375 ¥1,288  ¥(8,546 ¥(7,258

Foreign offices

 19,830  104,835  124,665  3,785  55,082  58,867    20,404  (387,918 (367,514 (1,698 (9,610 (11,308
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 21,667  112,058  133,725  6,233  40,483  46,716    23,436  (426,325 (402,889 (410 (18,156 (18,566
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Call money and bills sold:

      

Call money and bills sold, repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent and other interest-bearing liabilities:

       

Domestic offices

 62  148  210  (715 (717 (1,432   (427 (38,490 (38,917 12,279  (18,170 (5,891

Foreign offices

 1,747  1,520  3,267  (286 1,421  1,135    (10,835 (86,779 (97,614 9,925  4,948  14,873 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 1,809  1,668  3,477  (1,001 704  (297   (11,262 (125,269 (136,531 22,204  (13,222 8,982 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent:

      

Trading liabilities(1):

       

Domestic offices

 2,971  8,187  11,158  (27 (2,939 (2,966   (2,780 (4,135 (6,915 3,118  (6,358 (3,240

Foreign offices

 7,035  22,525  29,560  4,344  4,140  8,484    70  (1,836 (1,766 (273 313  40 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 10,006  30,712  40,718  4,317  1,201  5,518    (2,710 (5,971 (8,681 2,845  (6,045 (3,200
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Trading liabilities(1):

      

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss(2):

       

Domestic offices

 126  (4,879 (4,753 (1,628 (4,774 (6,402   (293  —    (293  —     —     —   

Foreign offices

 405  901  1,306  363  (230 133    6,364   —    6,364   —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 531  (3,978 (3,447 (1,265 (5,004 (6,269   6,071   —    6,071   —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Borrowings:

             

Domestic offices

 19,619  (16,931 2,688  (13,227 15,646  2,419    19,921  (40,676 (20,755 7,363  (19,424 (12,061

Foreign offices

 3,639  3,034  6,673  471  4,742  5,213    (44 (9,002 (9,046 (15,942 13,195  (2,747
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 23,258  (13,897 9,361  (12,756 20,388  7,632    19,877  (49,678 (29,801 (8,579 (6,229 (14,808
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Debt securities in issue:

             

Domestic offices

 16,340  19,816  36,156  4,910  5,418  10,328    7,006  (103,768 (96,762 (9,627 3,953  (5,674

Foreign offices

 (97 7,778  7,681  (4,925 6,362  1,437    (3,418 (23,088 (26,506 (15,131 (2,757 (17,888
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 16,243  27,594  43,837  (15 11,780  11,765    3,588  (126,856 (123,268 (24,758 1,196  (23,562
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other interest-bearing liabilities:

      

Premiums for deposit insurance:

       

Domestic offices

 41  (96 (55 18  (115 (97   (674  —    (674 479   —    479 

Foreign offices

 493  75  568  29  (29 0    (322  —    (322 775   —    775 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 534  (21 513  47  (144 (97   (996  —    (996 1,254   —    1,254 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest expense:

             

Domestic offices

 40,996      13,468  54,464  (8,221 (2,080 (10,301   25,785  (225,476 (199,691 14,900  (48,545 (33,645

Foreign offices

 33,052  140,668  173,720  3,781      71,488      75,269    12,219  (508,623 (496,404 (22,344 6,089  (16,255
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥74,048  ¥154,136  ¥228,184  ¥(4,440 ¥69,408  ¥64,968   ¥38,004  ¥(734,099 ¥(696,095 ¥(7,444 ¥(42,456 ¥(49,900
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income:

             

Domestic offices

 ¥(7,104 ¥(40,891 ¥(47,995 ¥  49,430  ¥(68,484 ¥(19,054  ¥57,401  ¥(2,213 ¥55,188  ¥(8,125 ¥(22,932 ¥(31,057

Foreign offices

   61,433  (3,656     57,777  (17,689 (16,852 (34,541   39,122  (33,955 5,167  84,715  (8,103 76,612 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥54,329  ¥(44,547 ¥9,782  ¥31,741  ¥(85,336 ¥(53,595  ¥96,523  ¥(36,168 ¥60,355  ¥76,590  ¥(31,035 ¥45,555 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The net amount of interest income on trading assets and interest expense on trading liabilities is reported as net trading income in our consolidated income statement.

(2)

Interest income and expense on financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss isare reported in net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss in our consolidated income statement.

II.

Investment Portfolio

The information as to the value ofheld-to-maturity investments debt instruments at amortized cost andavailable-for-sale financial assets debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 is presented on “Item 5.A. Operating Results—Financial Condition—Investment Securities.”

The following table shows the book values, maturities and weighted average yields ofheld-to-maturity investments debt instruments at amortized cost andavailable-for-sale financial assets, excluding equity debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2018.2021. Weighted average yields are calculated based on amortized cost. Yields ontax-exempt obligations have not been calculated on a tax equivalent basis because the effect of such a calculation would not be material.

 

  Not later than
one year
  Later than
one year and
not later than
five years
  Later than
five years and
not later than
ten years
  Later than
ten years
  Total 
  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
  (In millions, except percentages) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

          

Domestic:

          

Japanese government bonds

 ¥92,033   1.38 ¥280,426   0.13 ¥—     —    ¥—     —    ¥372,459   0.44

Japanese municipal bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total domestic

  92,033   1.38  280,426   0.13  —     —     —     —     372,459   0.44
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Foreign:

          

U.S. Treasury and other U.S.
government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Other debt instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

 ¥92,033   1.38 ¥280,426   0.13 ¥—     —    ¥—     —    ¥372,459   0.44
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Available-for-sale financial assets:

          

Domestic:

          

Japanese government bonds

 ¥3,077,986   (0.24%)  ¥3,937,851   (0.04%)  ¥348,772   (0.02%)  ¥320,694   0.51 ¥7,685,303   (0.09%) 

Japanese municipal bonds

  18   2.50  21,741   0.05  25,255   0.12  18   1.73  47,032   0.09

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     74,984   0.07  48,676   0.19  172,941   0.52  296,601   0.35
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total domestic

  3,078,004   (0.24%)   4,034,576   (0.03%)   422,703   0.01  493,653   0.51  8,028,936   (0.06%) 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Foreign:

          

U.S. Treasury and other U.S.
government agency bonds

  236,819   1.14  1,367,758   1.68  1,540,584   1.75  101,485   2.88  3,246,646   1.71

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  1,495,513   1.23  198,506   2.19  315,968   0.53  177,463   0.60  2,187,450   1.16

Mortgage-backed securities(1)

  —     —     —     —     232   1.81  487,951   3.00  488,183   3.00

Other debt instruments

  223,848   3.19  56,973   3.95  34,429   1.65  16,241   0.43  331,491   3.03
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total foreign

  1,956,180   1.44  1,623,237   1.82  1,891,213   1.56  783,140   2.39  6,253,770   1.69
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

 ¥5,034,184   0.42 ¥5,657,813   0.50 ¥2,313,916   1.29 ¥1,276,793   1.69 ¥14,282,706   0.71
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

(1)Foreign mortgage-backed securities primarily consist of securities of Government National Mortgage Association, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.
  Not later than
one year
  Later than
one year and
not later than
five years
  Later than
five years and
not later than
ten years
  Later than
ten years
  Total 
  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
  (In millions, except percentages) 

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

          

Domestic:

          

Japanese government bonds

 ¥—     —    ¥—     —    ¥—     —    ¥—     —    ¥—     —   

Japanese municipal bonds

  —     —     —     —     22,300   0.09  —     —     22,300   0.09

Japanese corporate bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total domestic

  —     —     —     —     22,300   0.09  —     —     22,300   0.09
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Foreign:

          

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  34,996   3.94  12,050   5.92  83   5.68  —     —     47,129   4.45

Other debt instruments

  1,137   7.06  1,449   5.30  —     —     —     —     2,586   6.07
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total foreign

  36,133   4.04  13,499   5.85  83   5.68  —     —     49,715   4.53
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

 ¥36,133   4.04 ¥13,499   5.85 ¥22,383   0.11 ¥—     —    ¥72,015   3.16
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

          

Domestic:

          

Japanese government bonds

 ¥5,901,804   (0.15%)  ¥6,671,473   (0.12%)  ¥1,418,521   (0.08%)  ¥301,813   0.15 ¥14,293,611   (0.12%) 

Japanese municipal bonds

  7,169   0.00  206,678   0.01  506,594   0.11  12,181   0.17  732,622   0.09

Japanese corporate bonds

  45,803   0.02  150,694   0.06  128,650   0.14  400,748   0.38  725,895   0.25

Other debt instruments

  310   0.00  —     —     —     —     —     —     310   0.00
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total domestic

  5,955,086   (0.15%)   7,028,845   (0.12%)   2,053,765   (0.02%)   714,742   0.28  15,752,438   (0.09%) 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Foreign:

          

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

  505,543   1.50  3,853,514   0.89  1,205,887   0.60  —     —     5,564,944   0.88

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

  1,534,842   0.56  816,902   1.99  353,866   0.43  288,422   0.01  2,994,032   0.88

Mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     2   2.06  216   0.75  1,658,514   2.53  1,658,732   2.53

Other debt instruments

  252,182   1.48  116,151   1.88  28,756   0.90  25,400   1.26  422,489   1.54
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total foreign

  2,292,567   0.87  4,786,569   1.11  1,588,725   0.57  1,972,336   2.13  10,640,197   1.14
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

 ¥8,247,653   0.13 ¥11,815,414   0.38 ¥3,642,490   0.24 ¥2,687,078   1.63 ¥26,392,635   0.39
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Excluding securities of the U.S. government and U.S. government agencies and corporations and Japanese government bonds, there are no investments in any individual issuers held in our investment portfolio which exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity in the consolidated statement of financial position at March 31, 2018.2021.

III.

Loan Portfolio

The following table shows our outstanding loans and advances by the domicile and industry type of the borrowers at March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2017. The classification of loans and advances by industry is based on the industry segment loan classification as defined by the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) for regulatory reporting purposes.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016 2015 2014   2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

  ¥7,961,620  ¥9,578,147  ¥8,298,576  ¥8,061,654  ¥8,018,568   ¥10,174,683  ¥8,787,566  ¥8,522,451  ¥7,961,620  ¥9,578,147 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   145,957  174,021  184,314  171,855  177,012    277,471  280,233  288,099  145,957  174,021 

Construction

   947,765  1,151,989  1,169,900  1,150,616  1,152,388    886,539  919,043  918,617  947,765  1,151,989 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   5,424,054  5,365,225  5,258,899  5,175,949  5,086,361    5,878,522  5,637,560  5,596,935  5,424,054  5,365,225 

Wholesale and retail

   5,288,767  5,721,005  5,548,103  5,664,385  5,505,570    6,014,746  5,375,802  5,281,596  5,288,767  5,721,005 

Finance and insurance

   2,777,862  2,844,546  2,684,865  2,869,967  2,537,347    3,423,625  3,217,545  3,129,666  2,777,862  2,844,546 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   9,017,664  10,101,846  9,587,757  8,766,724  8,117,000    11,760,698  10,666,446  10,126,531  9,017,664  10,101,846 

Services

   4,255,228  4,885,247  4,960,352  4,776,706  4,855,536    4,831,938  4,452,195  4,328,173  4,255,228  4,885,247 

Municipalities

   1,000,286  1,216,211  1,374,306  1,353,949  1,279,010    625,639  839,878  866,373  1,000,286  1,216,211 

Lease financing

   14,629  2,706,641  2,212,048  2,211,773  2,133,760    24,678  8,380  9,030  14,629  2,706,641 

Consumer(1)

   16,363,489  19,096,755  18,935,521  18,817,259  19,086,241    15,274,719  15,691,638  16,187,195  16,363,489  19,096,755 

Others

   4,633,306  5,178,461  2,989,278  3,211,240  3,159,438    4,133,900  4,308,469  4,601,499  4,633,306  5,178,461 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   57,830,627  68,020,094  63,203,919  62,232,077  61,108,231    63,307,158  60,184,755  59,856,165  57,830,627  68,020,094 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

            

Public sector

   372,008  299,746  236,290  164,495  163,685    309,372  335,071  360,875  372,008  299,746 

Financial institutions

   4,496,646  4,588,001  4,067,764  3,880,655  3,450,482    7,241,844  6,220,956  5,382,130  4,496,646  4,588,001 

Commerce and industry

   21,023,885  21,041,905  20,451,545  20,010,729  16,435,047    24,659,663  25,597,599  23,285,374  21,023,885  21,041,905 

Lease financing

   357,660  404,658  357,072  308,128  267,394    306,988  309,531  344,958  357,660  404,658 

Others

   1,779,101  1,836,322  1,481,455  1,375,624  947,826    3,000,530  2,994,838  2,316,816  1,779,101  1,836,322 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   28,029,300  28,170,632  26,594,126  25,739,631  21,264,434    35,518,397  35,457,995  31,690,153  28,029,300  28,170,632 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   85,859,927  96,190,726  89,798,045  87,971,708  82,372,665    98,825,555  95,642,750  91,546,318  85,859,927  96,190,726 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortizedpremiums-net and deferred loanfees-net

   (239,181 (236,425 (212,957 (206,440 (177,018   (261,330 (264,527 (258,392 (239,181 (236,425

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (491,676 (680,456 (722,717 (793,552 (950,665   (849,287 (706,405 (604,988 (491,676 (680,456
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845  ¥88,862,371  ¥86,971,716  ¥81,244,982 

Carrying amount

  ¥97,714,938  ¥94,671,818  ¥90,682,938  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The balance in Consumer mainly consists of housing loans. The housing loan balances amounted to ¥10,736,709 million, ¥10,913,869 million, ¥11,216,711 million, ¥11,482,678 million ¥13,766,771 million, ¥13,984,755 million, ¥14,087,453 million and ¥14,420,225¥13,766,771 million at March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans and Advances to Changes in Interest Rates

The following table shows the maturities of loans and advances by the domicile and industry type of the borrower at March 31, 2018.2021.

 

 Maturity   Maturity 
 Not later than
one year
 Later than one
year and not later
than five years
 Later than five
years
 Total   Not later than
one year
   Later than one
year and not later
than five years
   Later than
five years
   Total 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

 ¥4,173,663  ¥2,482,639  ¥1,305,318  ¥7,961,620   ¥4,663,355   ¥3,779,062   ¥1,732,266   ¥10,174,683 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

 38,917  65,018  42,022  145,957    40,810    189,020    47,641    277,471 

Construction

 512,223  320,893  114,649  947,765    438,378    315,032    133,129    886,539 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

 1,810,550  2,289,942  1,323,562  5,424,054    1,863,748    2,229,788    1,784,986    5,878,522 

Wholesale and retail

 2,976,092  1,789,409  523,266  5,288,767    3,730,302    1,616,319    668,125    6,014,746 

Finance and insurance

 1,605,481  901,362  271,019  2,777,862    1,810,408    1,266,445    346,772    3,423,625 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

 1,966,419  3,802,558  3,248,687  9,017,664    2,862,997    5,123,801    3,773,900    11,760,698 

Services

 1,288,816  1,849,411  1,117,001  4,255,228    1,565,938    1,907,499    1,358,501    4,831,938 

Municipalities

 446,525  314,224  239,537  1,000,286    142,579    301,767    181,293    625,639 

Lease financing

 2,229  4,787  7,613  14,629    5,871    14,517    4,290    24,678 

Consumer

 3,678,228  4,181,407  8,503,854  16,363,489    3,537,904    4,099,651    7,637,164    15,274,719 

Others

 1,939,994  1,002,939  1,690,373  4,633,306    1,675,124    1,083,057    1,375,719    4,133,900 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

 20,439,137  19,004,589  18,386,901  57,830,627    22,337,414    21,925,958    19,043,786    63,307,158 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

            

Public sector

 24,867  292,206  54,935  372,008    36,503    202,780    70,089    309,372 

Financial institutions

 2,039,934  2,152,491  304,221  4,496,646    3,391,625    3,174,820    675,399    7,241,844 

Commerce and industry

 6,651,323  10,046,923  4,325,639  21,023,885    9,053,089    10,597,075    5,009,499    24,659,663 

Lease financing

 45,285  236,466  75,909  357,660    35,359    145,933    125,696    306,988 

Others

 555,118  879,785  344,198  1,779,101    1,130,114    1,460,923    409,493    3,000,530 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign

 9,316,527  13,607,871  5,104,902  28,029,300    13,646,690    15,581,531    6,290,176    35,518,397 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥29,755,664  ¥32,612,460  ¥23,491,803  ¥85,859,927   ¥35,984,104   ¥37,507,489   ¥25,333,962   ¥98,825,555 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The above loans and advances due after one year which had predetermined interest rates and floating or adjustable interest rates at March 31, 20182021 are shown below:

 

  Domestic   Foreign   Total   Domestic   Foreign   Total 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Predetermined rate

  ¥12,233,092   ¥2,343,758   ¥14,576,850   ¥13,308,350   ¥2,895,815   ¥16,204,165 

Floating or adjustable rate

   25,158,398    16,369,015    41,527,413    27,661,394    18,975,892    46,637,286 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥37,391,490   ¥18,712,773   ¥56,104,263   ¥40,969,744   ¥21,871,707   ¥62,841,451 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired Loans and Advances

Our credit risk elements analyzed by categories for loans and advances differ from those required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Our impaired loans and advances are comprised of “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more (loans),” “restructured (loans)” and “other impaired (loans and advances).” “Potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances)” comprises of loans and advances to the borrowers that are perceived to have a

high risk of falling into bankruptcy, may not have been legally or formally declared bankrupt but are essentially bankrupt, or have been legally or formally declared bankrupt. Loans classified as “past due three months or more

(loans)” represent those loans that are three months or more past due as to principal or interest, which are not included in “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances).” The category “restructured (loans)” comprises of loans not included above for which the terms of the loans have been modified to grant concessions because of problems with the borrower. Examples of modifications to grant concessions include reductions of the original interest rate, deferrals of interest payments, deductions of the contractual repayment amounts and extensions of principal repayments such as the extension of the repayment date and the suspension of contracted repayments. “Other impaired (loans and advances)” representrepresents impaired loans and advances, which are not included in “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more (loans),” or “restructured (loans),” but for which information about credit problems cause management to classify them as impaired loans and advances. All loans and advances for which management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply in the near future with the repayment terms are included in impaired loans and advances.

An allowance is recorded if there is objective evidence of impairment and the carrying value of the loans and advances exceeds the present value of their estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. Cash receipts on impaired loans and advances are recorded as a credit to the balance of loans and advances on the statement of financial position. To the extent that cash receipts are different from expectations built into the calculation of the recoverable amount of the loans and advances, the amount of allowance for loan losses is revised. In accordance with IFRS, the accrual of interest as per the contractual terms is discontinued when loans and advances are determined to be impaired. Interest income recognized in the consolidated income statement on impaired loans and advances represents the accretion of the net present value of the written down amount due to the passage of time based on the original effective interest rate of the loans and advances.

The following table shows the distribution of impaired loans and advances by “potentially bankrupt, effectivelyvirtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances),” “past due three months or more (loans),” “restructured (loans),” and “other impaired (loans and advances)” at March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 2017, 2016, 2015 and 20142017 by the domicile and industry type of the borrowers.

 

 At March 31,   At March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014   2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Potentially bankrupt, effectively bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances):

     

Potentially bankrupt, virtually bankrupt and bankrupt (loans and advances):

      

Domestic:

           

Manufacturing

 ¥62,322  ¥106,178  ¥119,318  ¥149,686  ¥183,257   ¥63,894  ¥44,640  ¥98,260  ¥62,322  ¥106,178 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

 6,369  2,250  2,843  7,146  3,251    7,836  7,648  6,229  6,369  2,250 

Construction

 10,439  24,430  25,932  36,903  69,144    8,086  10,008  15,762  10,439  24,430 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

 15,494  23,692  38,008  52,168  56,782    36,177  35,562  30,691  15,494  23,692 

Wholesale and retail

 74,332  104,472  125,241  156,753  208,491    75,040  67,810  74,865  74,332  104,472 

Finance and insurance

 3,021  4,135  8,302  9,551  13,378    6,842  5,556  8,266  3,021  4,135 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

 32,634  126,179  133,324  198,714  291,665    26,658  28,189  29,999  32,634  126,179 

Services

 50,858  91,943  126,781  161,384  192,191    64,574  44,040  56,861  50,858  91,943 

Lease financing

  —    7,513  16,122  18,522  21,079    —     —     —     —    7,513 

Consumer

 157,221  194,721  213,931  223,464  238,563    156,133  162,881  159,375  157,221  194,721 

Others

 23,081  25,059  32,503  43,443  59,812    23,474  19,475  21,120  23,081  25,059 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 435,771  710,572  842,305  1,057,734  1,337,613    468,714  425,809  501,428  435,771  710,572 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

           

Public sector

  —     —    31  14  14 

Financial institutions

 30  29  28  19,720  2,647    11,632  29  180  30  29 

Commerce and industry

 144,975  157,227  148,475  146,821  131,254    179,199  137,438  109,453  144,975  157,227 

Lease financing

  —    11,892  11,104  8,969  8,623    —     —     —     —    11,892 

Others

 22,383  23,890  5,682  6,152  4,566    23,012  9,118  24,409  22,383  23,890 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 167,388  193,038  165,320  181,676  147,104    213,843  146,585  134,042  167,388  193,038 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 603,159  903,610  1,007,625  1,239,410  1,484,717    682,557  572,394  635,470  603,159  903,610 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Past due three months or more (loans):

           

Domestic

 21,649  20,808  21,861  23,586  25,959    37,297  27,923  24,781  21,649  20,808 

Foreign

  —    11,449  7,962  398  437    —     —    2,525   —    11,449 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 21,649  32,257  29,823  23,984  26,396    37,297  27,923  27,306  21,649  32,257 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Restructured (loans):

           

Domestic

 136,582  155,100  164,035  144,628  247,351    228,631  144,034  127,316  136,582  155,100 

Foreign

 17,567  25,741  22,401  43,330  37,475    146,324  42,123  18,624  17,567  25,741 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 154,149  180,841  186,436  187,958  284,826    374,955  186,157  145,940  154,149  180,841 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other impaired (loans and advances):

           

Domestic

 93,175  103,777  126,211  140,858  152,873    36,343  52,020  66,285  93,175  103,777 

Foreign

 6,736  8,203  2,492  5,892  1    40,424  6,835  7,017  6,736  8,203 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 99,911  111,980  128,703  146,750  152,874    76,767  58,855  73,302  99,911  111,980 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross impaired loans and advances

 878,868  1,228,688  1,352,587  1,598,102  1,948,813    1,171,576  845,329  882,018  878,868  1,228,688 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses for impaired loans and advances

 (369,386 (532,451 (613,510 (699,207 (857,095   (423,222 (355,737 (354,448 (369,386 (532,451
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net impaired loans and advances

 ¥509,482  ¥696,237  ¥739,077  ¥898,895  ¥1,091,718   ¥748,354  ¥489,592  ¥527,570  ¥509,482  ¥696,237 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest Foregone on Impaired Loans and Advances

Interest income which would have been accrued at the original terms on domestic impaired loans and advances during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 was ¥26.9¥18.8 billion, of which ¥14.7¥9.4 billion was included in profit or loss for the fiscal year then ended. Interest income which would have been accrued at the original terms on foreign impaired loans and advances during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 was ¥5.8¥7.3 billion, of which ¥4.2¥4.0 billion was included in profit or loss for the fiscal year then ended.

Cross-border Outstanding

Cross-border outstandings are defined as loans, acceptances, interest-earning deposits with other banks, other interest-earning investments and any other monetary assets denominated in Japanese yen or othernon-local currencies. Local currency outstandings are netted out from cross-border outstandings. This cross-border disclosure is based on the reports to the BOJ required under Japanese foreign exchange-related laws. The following tables list the countrycountries for which cross-border outstandings exceeded 0.75% of consolidated total assets at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
  Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
   Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
 
  (In millions, except percentages)   (In millions, except percentages) 

United Kingdom

  ¥5,507   ¥222,918   ¥1,425,584   ¥1,654,009    0.86 ¥1,242,180   ¥17,973   ¥384,742   ¥1,579,049   ¥1,981,764    0.84 ¥977,799 
  At March 31, 2017 
  Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
 
  (In millions, except percentages) 

United Kingdom

  ¥4,403   ¥275,243   ¥1,451,955   ¥1,731,601    0.91 ¥1,560,865 
  At March 31, 2016 
  Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
 
  (In millions, except percentages) 

United Kingdom

  ¥1,852   ¥556,271   ¥1,215,588   ¥1,773,711    0.98 ¥1,422,058 

United States

  ¥435,558   ¥225,955   ¥1,524,933   ¥2,186,446    0.93 ¥385,301 

   At March 31, 2020 
   Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
  Undrawn
commitments
 
   (In millions, except percentages) 

United Kingdom

  ¥7,403   ¥361,505   ¥1,356,994   ¥1,725,902    0.81 ¥872,223 

United States

  ¥374,289   ¥236,470   ¥1,783,450   ¥2,394,209    1.13 ¥417,552 

   At March 31, 2019 
   Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
  Undrawn
commitments
 
   (In millions, except percentages) 

United Kingdom

  ¥9,498   ¥238,794   ¥1,449,225   ¥1,697,517    0.87 ¥975,850 

United States

  ¥406,416   ¥215,237   ¥1,317,859   ¥1,939,512    0.99 ¥343,973 

Loan Concentrations

At March 31, 2018,2021, there were no concentrations of loans and advances to a single industry group of borrowers, as defined by the BOJ industry segment loan and advance classifications, which exceeded 10% of our consolidated total loans and advances, except for loans and advances in a category disclosed in the table of outstanding loans and advances above.

IV.

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

The following table shows an analysis of our loan loss experience by the borrowers’ domicile and industry type for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2017.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016 2015 2014   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  (In millions, except percentages)   2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 
  (In millions, except percentages) 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

  ¥680,456  ¥722,717  ¥793,552  ¥950,665  ¥1,262,478   ¥706,405  ¥604,988  ¥651,620  ¥680,456  ¥722,717 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   126,623  141,457  118,750  79,552  (25,806

Provision for loan losses

   277,085  249,478  122,927  126,623  141,457 

Charge-offs:

            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   6,439  9,712  20,992  26,516  25,610    2,276  7,374  9,642  6,439  9,712 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   1,772  388  33  112  187    —    22  282  1,772  388 

Construction

   1,478  1,810  6,407  8,593  20,958    377  845  1,159  1,478  1,810 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   1,609  9,731  5,891  8,662  5,309    492  579  1,556  1,609  9,731 

Wholesale and retail

   10,998  13,293  14,824  27,357  27,944    3,515  6,435  10,315  10,998  13,293 

Finance and insurance

   121  16  423  1,117  533    9  2,236  96  121  16 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   12,947  6,246  21,017  54,003  73,025    174  923  4,291  12,947  6,246 

Services

   9,548  5,731  14,396  21,143  30,970    2,110  9,795  4,784  9,548  5,731 

Lease financing

   511  454  651  1,433  1,582    —     —    637  511  454 

Consumer

   112,265  102,383  87,969  88,795  93,616    87,740  97,655  104,748  112,265  102,383 

Others

   3,838  7,609  828  2,932  3,300    244  464  1,986  3,838  7,609 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   161,526  157,373  173,431  240,663  283,034    96,937  126,328  139,496  161,526  157,373 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

      

Financial institutions

   —     —     —    1,017  599 

Commerce and industry

   13,529  24,658  13,236  4,571  14,959 

Lease financing

   24  177  3  167  1,292 

Others

   9,981  8,300  6,979  3,478  2,797 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   23,534  33,135  20,218  9,233  19,647 

Foreign

   64,666  27,664  40,758  23,534  33,135 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   185,060  190,508  193,649  249,896  302,681    161,603  153,992  180,254  185,060  190,508 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Recoveries:

            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   27  61  80  62  12    19  2  1  27  61 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   —    5   —     —     —      —     —    2   —    5 

Construction

   5  6  6  17  16    —     —    5  5  6 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   1  62  5  14  3    —     —     —    1  62 

Wholesale and retail

   28  86  45  72  19    —    4   —    28  86 

Finance and insurance

   1   —    2  1   —      —     —     —    1   —   

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   2  1  55  47  20    —    16   —    2  1 

Services

   38  40  61  63  33    1   —    12  38  40 

Consumer

   9,535  9,571  9,223  9,234  9,186    10,800  10,074  9,739  9,535  9,571 

Others

   21  20   —    7  4    16   —    8  21  20 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   9,658  9,852  9,477  9,517  9,293    10,836  10,096  9,767  9,658  9,852 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

      

Financial institutions

   —    15  109   —    25 

Commerce and industry

   17  5  335  14  3 

Others

   557  425  427  366  334 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   574  445  871  380  362 

Foreign

   1,965  2,317  1,275  574  445 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   10,232  10,297  10,348  9,897  9,655    12,801  12,413  11,042  10,232  10,297 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   174,828  180,211  183,301  239,999  293,026    148,802  141,579  169,212  174,828  180,211 

Others(1)

   (140,575 (3,507 (6,284 3,334  7,019    14,599  (6,482 (347 (140,575 (3,507
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period

  ¥491,676  ¥680,456  ¥722,717  ¥793,552  ¥950,665   ¥849,287  ¥706,405  ¥604,988  ¥491,676  ¥680,456 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period

   0.18 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.36   0.15 0.15 0.19 0.18 0.20

Allowance for loan losses applicable to foreign activities:

            

Balance at beginning of period

  ¥128,347  ¥134,664  ¥100,783  ¥73,030  ¥74,868   ¥258,143  ¥155,114  ¥153,167  ¥128,347  ¥134,664 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of period

  ¥114,306  ¥128,347  ¥134,664  ¥100,783  ¥73,030   ¥284,381  ¥258,143  ¥155,114  ¥114,306  ¥128,347 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision for loan losses

  ¥19,872  ¥29,699  ¥60,002  ¥32,712  ¥10,462   ¥74,471  ¥134,657  ¥46,597  ¥19,872  ¥29,699 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Others mainly include foreign exchange translations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021, 2020 and 2017. The amount for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 mainly includes the exclusion of the allowance for loans and advances made by KUBCKansai Urban Banking Corporation and The Minato Bank,MINATO BANK, LTD, both of which had been our subsidiaries but became our equity-method associates, and the exclusion of the allowance for loans and advances made by SMFL which was reclassified as assets held for sale.

SMFL which were reclassified as assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The amount for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 mainly includes foreign exchange translations.

The following table shows an allocation of the allowance for loan losses by the borrower’s domicile and industry type at March 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2017.

 

 At March 31,  At March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
  Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Domestic:

                   

Manufacturing

 ¥67,511  9.27 ¥101,936  9.96 ¥63,720  9.24 ¥82,938  9.16 ¥113,463  9.73 ¥94,518  10.30 ¥36,263  9.19 ¥35,358  9.31 ¥67,511  9.27 ¥101,936  9.96

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

 6,047  0.17 2,251  0.18 2,712  0.21 2,673  0.20 3,310  0.21 7,287  0.28 7,132  0.29 6,335  0.31 6,047  0.17 2,251  0.18

Construction

 4,171  1.10 14,142  1.20 15,212  1.30 22,532  1.31 40,289  1.40 4,252  0.90 5,346  0.96 7,888  1.00 4,171  1.10 14,142  1.20

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

 8,431  6.32 16,237  5.58 25,119  5.86 30,555  5.88 27,196  6.17 37,631  5.95 29,631  5.89 24,133  6.11 8,431  6.32 16,237  5.58

Wholesale and retail

 45,321  6.16 54,896  5.95 73,230  6.18 84,941  6.44 116,862  6.68 51,965  6.09 52,874  5.62 48,883  5.77 45,321  6.16 54,896  5.95

Finance and insurance

 3,183  3.24 3,982  2.96 6,886  2.99 7,990  3.26 11,209  3.08 2,884  3.46 2,319  3.36 5,134  3.42 3,183  3.24 3,982  2.96

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

 14,650  10.50 85,813  10.50 94,669  10.68 127,205  9.97 194,706  9.85 25,789  11.90 22,638  11.15 25,635  11.06 14,650  10.50 85,813  10.50

Services

 32,690  4.96 52,282  5.08 60,735  5.52 77,829  5.43 96,465  5.89 99,603  4.89 35,386  4.66 42,172  4.73 32,690  4.96 52,282  5.08

Municipalities

  —    1.17  —    1.26 1  1.53 1  1.54 1  1.55  —    0.63  —    0.88  —    0.95  —    1.17  —    1.26

Lease financing

  —    0.02 4,114  2.81 11,567  2.46 13,600  2.51 14,487  2.59  —    0.02  —    0.01  —    0.01  —    0.02 4,114  2.81

Consumer

 177,013  19.06 194,964  19.85 208,274  21.09 208,661  21.39 215,882  23.17 225,091  15.46 240,047  16.41 233,287  17.68 177,013  19.06 194,964  19.85

Others

 18,353  5.38 21,492  5.38 25,928  3.32 33,844  3.65 43,765  3.87 15,886  4.18 16,626  4.51 21,049  5.03 18,353  5.38 21,492  5.38
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 377,370  67.35 552,109  70.71 588,053  70.38 692,769  70.74 877,635  74.19 564,906  64.06 448,262  62.93 449,874  65.38 377,370  67.35 552,109  70.71
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

                    

Public sector

 75  0.43 88  0.31 105  0.26 48  0.19 303  0.20 456  0.31 898  0.35 522  0.39 75  0.43 88  0.31

Financial institutions

 2,386  5.24 3,186  4.77 3,347  4.53 1,871  4.41 3,325  4.19 23,456  7.33 23,610  6.50 10,660  5.88 2,386  5.24 3,186  4.77

Commerce and industry

 92,255  24.49 108,076  21.88 117,671  22.78 86,007  22.75 60,646  19.95 229,983  24.95 207,723  26.76 120,748  25.44 92,255  24.49 108,076  21.88

Lease financing

 1,828  0.42 6,713  0.42 3,998  0.40 4,654  0.35 3,285  0.32 1,072  0.31 502  0.32 1,342  0.38 1,828  0.42 6,713  0.42

Others

 17,762  2.07 10,284  1.91 9,543  1.65 8,203  1.56 5,471  1.15 29,414  3.04 25,410  3.14 21,842  2.53 17,762  2.07 10,284  1.91
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 114,306  32.65 128,347  29.29 134,664  29.62 100,783  29.26 73,030  25.81 284,381  35.94 258,143  37.07 155,114  34.62 114,306  32.65 128,347  29.29
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥491,676  100.00 ¥680,456  100.00 ¥722,717  100.00 ¥793,552  100.00 ¥950,665  100.00 ¥849,287  100.00 ¥706,405  100.00 ¥604,988  100.00 ¥491,676  100.00 ¥680,456  100.00
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

V.

Deposits

The following table shows the average amount of, and the average rate paid on, the following deposit categories for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

 For the fiscal year ended March 31  For the fiscal year ended March 31 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
 Average
amount
 Average
rate
 Average
amount
 Average
rate
 Average
amount
 Average
rate
  Average
amount
 Average
rate
 Average
amount
 Average
rate
 Average
amount
 Average
rate
 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 

Domestic offices:

            

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

 ¥18,803,822   —    ¥16,791,818   —    ¥13,840,697   —    ¥25,395,340   —    ¥21,526,454   —    ¥19,831,261   —   

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 51,369,924  0.00 46,984,288  0.00 42,036,200  0.02 61,285,196  0.00 54,861,069  0.00 51,984,345  0.00

Deposits at notice

 998,707  0.00 906,703  0.00 779,789  0.02 803,286  0.00 816,445  0.00 935,063  0.00

Time deposits

 22,202,905  0.06 22,678,544  0.07 23,703,225  0.10 17,806,212  0.04 17,871,438  0.04 18,129,683  0.04

Negotiable certificates of deposit

 5,919,870  0.01 6,064,857  0.02 7,027,345  0.08 3,630,478  0.01 5,259,480  0.01 5,526,250  0.01

Others

 6,647,336  0.45 6,103,623  0.30 4,911,611  0.23 7,503,844  0.12 6,860,335  0.65 7,216,386  0.70
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total domestic offices

 105,942,564   99,529,833   92,298,867   116,424,356   107,195,221   103,622,988  
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Foreign offices:

            

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

 1,193,648   —    944,878   —    874,577   —    1,611,110   —    1,306,623   —    1,227,660   —   

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 2,645,695  0.84 2,524,336  0.40 1,859,753  0.33 3,456,953  0.30 3,010,904  1.24 2,852,999  1.27

Deposits at notice

 9,332,778  0.94 8,212,986  0.52 8,598,461  0.32 10,794,516  0.23 9,900,813  1.52 10,390,633  1.60

Time deposits

 6,930,572  1.98 6,266,975  1.53 5,277,263  1.40 8,056,423  1.18 7,540,045  2.77 7,818,323  2.59

Negotiable certificates of deposit

 6,366,473  1.41 6,249,295  1.02 6,973,391  0.66 5,833,985  0.58 6,572,168  2.02 6,086,906  2.24

Others

 138,216  0.49 129,410  0.48 129,662  0.83 143,509  0.08 173,971  1.15 134,615  0.98
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total foreign offices

 26,607,382   24,327,880   23,713,107   29,896,496   28,504,524   28,511,136  
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total

 ¥132,549,946   ¥123,857,713   ¥116,011,974   ¥146,320,852   ¥135,699,745   ¥132,134,124  
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Deposits at notice represent interest-bearing demand deposits which require the depositor to give two or more days’ notice in advance of withdrawal.

The total amount of deposits by foreign depositors included in domestic offices for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were ¥2,303,112¥2,518,291 million, ¥2,078,931¥2,206,185 million and ¥1,915,610¥2,460,264 million, respectively.

At March 31, 2018,2021, the balances and remaining maturities of time deposits and negotiable certificates of deposit issued by domestic offices in amounts of ¥10 million (approximately $94,118$90,326 at the median exchange rate for buying and selling spot dollars for yen by telegraphic transfer as determined by SMBC at the end of the current fiscal year) or more and total foreign deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more are shown in the following table.

 

  Time deposits   Negotiable
certificates of
deposit
   Total   Time deposits   Negotiable
certificates of
deposit
   Total 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic offices:

            

Not later than three months

  ¥2,708,722   ¥4,624,795   ¥7,333,517   ¥2,533,055   ¥4,717,667   ¥7,250,722 

Later than three months and not later than six months

   1,220,955    584,741    1,805,696    1,233,656    712,289    1,945,945 

Later than six months and not later than one year

   3,871,407    120,775    3,992,182    4,195,152    103,198    4,298,350 

Later than one year

   1,815,043    77,710    1,892,753    1,667,606    70,000    1,737,606 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥9,616,127   ¥5,408,021   ¥15,024,148   ¥9,629,469   ¥5,603,154   ¥15,232,623 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign offices:

  ¥7,488,786   ¥5,812,264   ¥13,301,050   ¥7,845,893   ¥6,967,464   ¥14,813,357 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

VI.

Return on Equity and Assets

The following table shows the ratio of return on equity and assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 

Return on average total assets

   0.4 0.3 0.5   0.3 0.1 0.3

Return on average shareholders’ equity

   6.6 6.0 8.1   6.2 1.9 5.3

Dividends payout ratio(1):

        

Basic

   28.8 32.7 25.1   38.9 127.2 45.1

Diluted

        28.8      32.7      25.1   38.9 127.2 45.2

Average shareholders’ equity to average total assets

   5.8 5.8 5.8   5.1 5.3 5.2

 

(1)

Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net profit per share.

 

VII.

Short-Term Borrowings

The following table shows certain additional information with respect to our short-term borrowings for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions, except percentages)   (In millions, except percentages) 

Call money, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions:

        

Average balance outstanding during the period

  ¥15,868,395  ¥11,453,458  ¥12,044,622   ¥15,464,319  ¥16,147,869  ¥12,591,665 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the period

   19,435,458  15,172,714  16,507,993    19,878,421  19,745,293  15,706,407 

Balance at end of period

   13,213,522  11,512,526  8,059,930    19,878,421  19,196,322  14,195,028 

Weighted average interest rate during the period

   0.44 0.23 0.17   0.06 0.88 1.07

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of period

   0.74 0.34 0.16   0.09 0.17 1.05

Commercial paper:

        

Average balance outstanding during the period

   3,390,092  3,456,337  4,555,927    2,288,920  2,160,939  3,590,252 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the period

   3,671,388  4,095,896  5,301,064    2,666,002  2,476,441  2,934,756 

Balance at end of period

   2,467,645  3,518,346  4,169,515    2,325,290  1,736,702  2,440,515 

Weighted average interest rate during the period

   0.56 0.44 0.28   0.27 1.46 1.27

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of period

   1.30 0.54 0.38   0.08 1.01 1.85

Short-term borrowings:

        

Average balance outstanding during the period

   6,442,910  4,091,095  4,757,270    8,811,054  6,755,141  4,093,115 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the period

   7,522,143  7,546,496  5,501,614    10,029,347  10,184,282  5,591,581 

Balance at end of period

   3,943,140  7,546,496  3,073,509    7,244,998  10,184,282  5,591,581 

Weighted average interest rate during the period

   0.10 0.16 0.17   0.07 0.12 0.26

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of period

   0.20 0.09 0.20   0.04 0.18 0.18

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following consolidated financial statements and the reports thereon by its independent registered public accounting firm are filed as part of this annual report:

 

  Page 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-3 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 F-8

Consolidated StatementStatements of Financial Position at March  31, 20182021 and 2017

F-6

Consolidated Income Statement for the Fiscal Years Ended March  31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

F-7

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 20162020

  F-8 

Consolidated StatementIncome Statements for the Fiscal Years Ended March  31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

F-9

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

F-10

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

  F-9F-11 

Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows
for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

  F-10F-13 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-11F-14 

1   General Information

  F-11F-14 

2   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  F-11F-14 

3   Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

  F-31F-36 

4   Segment Analysis

  F-34F-39 

5   Cash and Deposits with Banks

  F-38F-43 

6   Trading Assets

  F-39F-44 

7   Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting

  F-39F-44 

8   Financial Assets at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss

  F-42F-52 

9   Investment Securities

  F-43F-53 

10  Loans and Advances

  F-44F-57 

11  Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures

  F-46F-58 

12  Property, Plant and Equipment

  F-48F-60 

13  Leases

  F-48F-61 

14  Intangible Assets

  F-51F-63 

15  Other Assets

  F-55F-67 

16  Deposits

  F-55F-67 

17  Trading Liabilities

  F-56F-68 

18  Borrowings

F-57

19  Debt Securities in Issue

F-58

20  Provisions

F-59

21  OtherFinancial Liabilities

F-60

22  Deferred Income Tax

F-61

23  Retirement Benefits

F-63

24  Shareholders’ Equity Designated at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss

  F-68 

19  Borrowings

F-68

20  Debt Securities in Issue

F-69

21  Provisions

F-70

22  Other Liabilities

F-71

23  Deferred Income Tax

F-72

24  Retirement Benefits

F-74

25  Non-Controlling Interests andShareholders’ Equity

F-79

26  Equity Attributable to Other Equity Instruments Holders

  F-70F-82 

2627  Net Interest Income

  F-72F-83 

2728  Net Fee and Commission Income

  F-73F-83 

2829  Net Trading Income

  F-73F-84 

2930  Net Income (Loss) from Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss

  F-74F-84 

3031  Net Investment Income

  F-74F-85 

3132  Other Income

  F-74F-85 

3233  Impairment Charges on Financial Assets

  F-75F-85 

3334  General and Administrative Expenses

  F-75F-86 

3435  Other Expenses

  F-76

35  Income Tax Expense

F-76F-86 

   Page 

36  Income Tax Expense

F-87

37  Earnings Per Share

   F-78F-88 

3738  Transfers of Financial Assets

   F-78F-88 

3839  Assets Pledged and Received as Collateral

   F-80F-90 

3940  Share-Based Payment

   F-81F-91 

4041  Dividends Per Share

   F-83F-93 

4142  Contingency and Capital Commitments

   F-84F-93 

4243  Analysis of Financial Assets and Liabilities by Measurement Basis

   F-85F-95 

4344  Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

   F-87F-97 

4445  Offsetting of Financial Assets and Liabilities

   F-101F-111 

4546  Financial Risk Management

   F-102F-112 

4647  Related-Party Transactions

   F-128

47  Principal Subsidiaries

F-130F-137 

48  Structured Entities

F-131

49  Acquisitions

F-134

50  Assets and Disposal Groups Held for SalePrincipal Subsidiaries

   F-138 

49  Structured Entities

F-140

50  Acquisitions

F-143

51  Current andNon-CurrentDistinction

   F-140F-146 

52  Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (SMFG)

   F-141F-148 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Group”)Group) as of March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated income statement and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 20182021 and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as of March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Group’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated June 22, 201828 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Group in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgment. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of the allowance for loan losses for SMBC’s corporate loans

As discussed in Notes 2, 3, 10 and 46 to the consolidated financial statements, the Group’s allowance for loan losses (ALL) was ¥ 849,287 million on gross loans and advances of ¥ 98,825,555 million as of March 31, 2021. Included in such balances are corporate loans of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), a commercial banking subsidiary. The ALL for SMBC’s corporate loans is estimated based on the expected credit loss (ECL), utilizing internal credit ratings (obligor grades), and incorporating forward-looking information into the ECL measurement by obligor grading through a qualitative assessment, macroeconomic factors, and additional ALL adjustments to capture portfolio-specific risk factors. For individually significant credit-impaired financial assets, a discounted cash flow (DCF) method is used to estimate the ALL, where cash flow streams of multiple scenarios are probability-weighted.

We identified the assessment of the ALL for SMBC’s corporate loans as a critical audit matter because of the significant measurement uncertainty and complex judgment involved which required a high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge. Specifically, complex and subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate:

the qualitative assessment of the obligor grading, including the assessment of obligor-specific forward-looking information

the methodologies and key assumptions and inputs underlying the adjustments to incorporate macroeconomic factors and portfolio-specific risk factors

the projection of multiple cash flow scenarios and probability-weighting for the DCF method.

In the assessment of these elements, the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic was considered, including the adverse impact on individual customers’ liquidity positions, and also the credit risk implications from the observed trends in bankruptcy cases which reflected the effects of government support programs, and those from the economic environment affected by the voluntary restrictions on social and economic activities.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the assessment of SMBC’s ALL for its corporate loans, considering the uncertainty of the pandemic. This included controls to:

approve the ALL methodologies and assess the obligor grading methods

evaluate the individual obligor grading, including the qualitative assessment of obligor-specific forward-looking information

determine the methodologies and key assumptions and inputs underlying the adjustments to incorporate macroeconomic factors and portfolio-specific risk factors

evaluate the projection of multiple cash flow scenarios and probability-weighting for the DCF method.

We assessed the reasonableness of the ALL methodologies by (i) evaluating for compliance with IFRSs the methodologies used in the ALL estimate and (ii) involving credit risk professionals with specialized industry skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the obligor grading methods through the assessment of the consistency of the obligor grades with external ratings, and also through re-performing the retrospective review of the methods’ performance to distinguish defaulting from non-defaulting borrowers.

We evaluated the qualitative assessment of the obligor grading, specifically the assessment of obligor-specific forward-looking information including the impacts of the ongoing pandemic, for a selection of SMBC’s corporate customers by:

analyzing the customers’ current business performance and liquidity positions

assessing the feasibility of the customers’ business performance projections, through (i) comparing the underlying assumptions with available external information regarding the industry outlook, (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of the stress cases considered, and (iii) reviewing the current progress against the projections

analyzing the liquidity position forecasts, for which we considered the business performance projections and also the effects of the government and bank support programs including loan modifications.

We evaluated the adjustments to the ALL to incorporate macroeconomic factors and portfolio-specific risk factors including the economic uncertainty arising from the pandemic through (i) assessing the reasonableness of the methodologies by reviewing macroeconomic scenario analysis and portfolio-specific credit cost estimation and (ii) assessing the key assumptions and inputs underlying the adjustments by reviewing available external data on relevant macroeconomic scenarios such as GDP outlook, and industry-specific economic trends, and also by analyzing the impact of the restrictions on economic activities and the effects of the government and bank support programs in relation to the observed trends in bankruptcy cases.

We evaluated, for a selection of obligors, the multiple cash flow scenarios and probability-weighting for the DCF method through the assessment of obligors’ restructuring plans which incorporated the impacts of the pandemic, the schedule and underlying sources of the repayments based on the plans, and the current progress against the plans.

/s/ KPMG AZSA LLC

We have served as the Group’s auditor since 1976.

Tokyo, Japan

June 22, 201828, 2021

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Group”)Group) internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Group maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial position of the Group as of March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the related consolidated income statement and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated June 22, 201828, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Group’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Group’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Group in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG AZSA LLC

Tokyo, Japan

June 22, 201828, 2021

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated StatementStatements of Financial Position

 

      At March 31,       At March 31, 
  Note   2018 2017   Note   2021 2020 
      (In millions)       (In millions) 

Assets:

          

Cash and deposits with banks

   5   ¥54,696,069  ¥47,330,155    5   ¥73,090,816  ¥62,471,453 

Call loans and bills bought

     1,881,880  1,872,209      2,553,468  898,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

     8,491,703  8,924,385      11,738,072  13,745,996 

Trading assets

   6    3,169,123  3,776,671    6    3,140,736  2,785,016 

Derivative financial instruments

   7    3,885,271  4,063,982    7    5,521,617  6,279,801 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   8    1,547,672  1,599,093    8    1,744,848  1,478,356 

Investment securities

   9    20,495,075  19,073,937    9    31,051,461  21,864,386 

Loans and advances

   10    85,129,070  95,273,845    10    97,714,938  94,671,818 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

   11    730,414  675,704    11    886,685  826,736 

Property, plant and equipment

   12    1,510,132  2,686,055    12    1,754,661  1,764,611 

Intangible assets

   14    835,902  1,096,568    14    819,720  835,477 

Other assets

   15    4,043,908  4,321,724    15    4,945,631  4,272,630 

Current tax assets

     87,961  240,385      33,376  161,729 

Deferred tax assets

   22    19,436  81,961    23    28,958  102,198 

Assets held for sale

   50    5,651,950  134,307 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total assets

    ¥192,175,566  ¥191,150,981     ¥235,024,987  ¥212,158,463 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Liabilities:

          

Deposits

   16   ¥128,461,527  ¥130,295,290    16   ¥155,493,654  ¥138,431,418 

Call money and bills sold

     1,190,929  2,088,020      1,368,515  3,740,540 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

     12,022,593  9,424,506      18,509,906  15,455,782 

Trading liabilities

   17    2,143,899  2,071,584    17    2,080,826  2,018,484 

Derivative financial instruments

   7    3,498,016  3,889,694    7    4,949,433  5,555,201 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

   18    239,519   —   

Borrowings

   18    10,652,481  12,245,943    19    19,423,355  17,121,362 

Debt securities in issue

   19    10,569,117  11,165,623    20    11,228,600  10,985,048 

Provisions

   20    188,267  194,700    21    224,274  200,053 

Other liabilities

   21    6,882,740  7,461,101    22    8,777,502  7,601,355 

Current tax liabilities

     55,516  79,371      53,718  48,159 

Deferred tax liabilities

   22    397,741  320,201    23    399,535  66,183 

Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale

   50    3,616,941  27,665 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

     179,679,767  179,263,698      222,748,837  201,223,585 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Equity:

          

Capital stock

   24    2,338,743  2,337,896    25    2,341,274  2,339,965 

Capital surplus

   24    863,505  864,052    25    722,595  728,551 

Retained earnings

   24    5,149,193  4,609,496    25    6,078,208  5,609,854 

Treasury stock

   25    (13,699 (13,984
    

 

  

 

 

Equity excluding other reserves

     9,128,378  8,664,386 

Other reserves

   24    2,324,349  2,134,042    25    2,430,857  1,525,720 

Treasury stock

   24    (12,493 (12,913
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Equity attributable to shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

     10,663,297  9,932,573      11,559,235  10,190,106 

Non-controlling interests

   25    1,232,980  1,505,001      68,379  60,296 

Equity attributable to other equity instruments holders

   25    599,522  449,709    26    648,536  684,476 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total equity

     12,495,799  11,887,283      12,276,150  10,934,878 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

    ¥192,175,566  ¥191,150,981     ¥235,024,987  ¥212,158,463 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Income StatementStatements

 

      For the fiscal year ended March 31,       For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  Note   2018 2017   2016   Note   2021   2020 2019 
      (In millions, except per share data)       (In millions, except per share data) 

Interest income

    ¥2,144,070  ¥1,900,261   ¥1,872,584     ¥1,780,370   ¥2,407,045  ¥2,406,350 

Interest expense

     733,969  502,338    431,101      397,245    1,090,730  1,137,430 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

   26    1,410,101  1,397,923    1,441,483    27    1,383,125    1,316,315  1,268,920 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Fee and commission income

     1,131,364  1,066,412    1,031,680      1,174,382    1,147,132  1,101,777 

Fee and commission expense

     178,867  181,573    131,381      201,723    203,822  178,351 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net fee and commission income

   27    952,497  884,839    900,299    28    972,659    943,310  923,426 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net trading income

   28    270,464  183,963    462,682    29    237,746    134,069  320,302 

Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   29    (667 2,018    12,260 

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

   30    280,012    (21,939 54,655 

Net investment income

   30    424,097  305,327    375,229    31    153,820    176,464  93,922 

Other income

   31    755,855  573,825    496,273    32    138,223    155,631  505,666 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total operating income

     3,812,347  3,347,895    3,688,226      3,165,585    2,703,850  3,166,891 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Impairment charges on financial assets

   32    136,808  212,967    148,356    33    282,486    259,938  119,686 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net operating income

     3,675,539  3,134,928    3,539,870      2,883,099    2,443,912  3,047,205 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   33    1,813,121  1,752,135    1,706,263    34    1,679,115    1,696,386  1,679,813 

Other expenses

   34    792,765  531,759    538,963    35    283,879    488,806  575,657 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

     2,605,886  2,283,894    2,245,226      1,962,994    2,185,192  2,255,470 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures

     49,323  29,318    31,056      36,373    24,031  40,157 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

     1,118,976  880,352    1,325,700      956,478    282,751  831,892 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

   35    229,378  139,766    372,878    36    251,402    51,768  184,306 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net profit

    ¥889,598  ¥740,586   ¥952,822     ¥705,076   ¥230,983  ¥647,586 
    

 

  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

  

 

 

Profit attributable to:

              

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

    ¥759,998  ¥627,870   ¥843,920     ¥687,483   ¥200,052  ¥541,932 

Non-controlling interests

     119,878  104,787    106,129      4,471    18,567  93,779 

Other equity instruments holders

     9,722  7,929    2,773      13,122    12,364  11,875 

Earnings per share:

              

Basic

   36   ¥538.84  ¥458.56   ¥617.25    37   ¥501.73   ¥145.48  ¥387.76 

Diluted

   36    538.43  458.18    616.83    37    501.49    145.39  387.49 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated StatementStatements of Comprehensive Income

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Net profit

  ¥889,598  ¥740,586  ¥952,822   ¥705,076  ¥230,983  ¥647,586 

Other comprehensive income:

        

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:

        

Remeasurements of defined benefit plans:

        

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   73,662  8,134  (154,273   327,681  (88,950 (40,329

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   1,183,628  (507,362 (128,138

Own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss:

    

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   (4,981  —     —   

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of associates and joint ventures

   58  (462 558    6,375  (3,746 3,711 

Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified

   (22,492 (2,315 48,550    (465,333 181,202  61,453 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss, net of tax

   51,228  5,357  (105,165   1,047,370  (418,856 (103,303

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

        

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   582,435  371,438  (551,572   (186,656 329,196  150,074 

Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net profit, before tax

   (275,038 (109,990 (217,529   (79,711 (96,624 (6,071

Exchange differences on translating foreign operations:

        

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   (75,409 (24,063 (219,904   86,842  (78,742 22,517 

Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net profit, before tax

   49  (4 8    446  204  (37,247

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of associates and joint ventures

   7,827  (21,140 (14,362   2,960  (7,859 (4,410

Income tax relating to items that may be reclassified

   (96,246 (80,074 308,623    82,405  (68,152 (43,746
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss, net of tax

   143,618  136,167  (694,736   (93,714 78,023  81,117 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

   194,846  141,524  (799,901   953,656  (340,833 (22,186
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  ¥1,084,444  ¥882,110  ¥152,921 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

  ¥1,658,732  ¥(109,850 ¥625,400 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

    

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:

    

Shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

  ¥948,250  ¥769,957  ¥76,791   ¥1,640,700  ¥(138,071 ¥577,998 

Non-controlling interests

   126,472  104,224  73,357    4,910  15,857  35,527 

Other equity instruments holders

   9,722  7,929  2,773    13,122  12,364  11,875 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated StatementStatements of Changes in Equity

 

 Capital
stock
 Capital
surplus
 Retained
earnings
 Remeasure-
ments of
defined
benefit
plans
 Available-
for-sale
financial
assets
 Exchange
differences on
translating
foreign
operations
 Treasury
stock
 Equity
attributable
to SMFG’s
shareholders
 Non-
controlling
interests
 Equity
attributable to
other equity
instruments
holders
 Total equity  Equity excluding other reserves Other reserves         
 (In millions)  Capital
stock
 Capital
surplus
 Retained
earnings
 Treasury
stock
 Remeasure-
ments of
defined
benefit
plans
reserve
 Available-
for-sale
financial
assets
reserve
 Financial
instruments at
fair value
through other
comprehensive
income reserve
 Own credit
on financial
liabilities
designated
at fair value
through

profit or
loss reserve
 Exchange
differences on
translating
foreign
operations
reserve
 Equity
attributable
to SMFG’s
shareholders
 Non-
controlling
interests
 Equity
attributable to
other equity
instruments
holders
 Total equity 

Balance at March 31, 2015

 ¥2,337,896  ¥862,971  ¥3,554,688  ¥120,316  ¥2,234,636  ¥404,132  ¥(175,261 ¥9,339,378  ¥1,681,472  ¥—    ¥11,020,850 
 (In millions) 

Balance at March 31, 2018

 ¥2,338,743  ¥863,505  ¥5,149,193  ¥(12,493 ¥76,102  ¥2,122,260  ¥—    ¥—    ¥125,987  ¥10,663,297  ¥1,232,980  ¥599,522  ¥12,495,799 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of changes in accounting policies

  —     —    270,414   —     —    (2,122,260 1,718,937   —     —    (132,909 250   —    (132,659
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at April 1, 2018

 2,338,743  863,505  5,419,607  (12,493 76,102   —    1,718,937   —    125,987  10,530,388  1,233,230  599,522  12,363,140 

Comprehensive income:

                        

Net profit

  —     —    843,920   —     —     —     —    843,920  106,129  2,773  952,822   —     —    541,932   —     —     —     —     —     —    541,932  93,779  11,875  647,586 

Other comprehensive income

  —     —     —    (101,331 (478,002 (187,796  —    (767,129 (32,772  —    (799,901

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  —     —     —     —    (27,109  —    75,828   —    (12,653 36,066  (58,252  —    (22,186
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —     —    843,920  (101,331 (478,002 (187,796  —    76,791  73,357  2,773  152,921   —     —    541,932   —    (27,109  —    75,828   —    (12,653 577,998  35,527  11,875  625,400 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Issuance of other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    299,895  299,895 

Issuance of shares under share-based payment transactions

 700  699   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1,399   —     —    1,399 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries andbusinesses-net

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1,371   —    1,371   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (306,444  —    (306,444

Transaction withnon-controlling interest shareholders

  —     —    (3  —     —     —     —    (3 58   —    55   —    (113,736  —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (113,736 (91,767  —    (205,503

Dividends to shareholders

  —     —    (211,922  —     —     —     —    (211,922 (76,710  —    (288,632  —     —    (245,577  —     —     —     —     —     —    (245,577 (77,184  —    (322,761

Coupons on other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (2,773 (2,773  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (11,875 (11,875

Redemption of preferred securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (142,000  —    (142,000  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (299,239  —    (299,239

Purchase of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    (192 (192  —     —    (192  —     —     —    (70,094  —     —     —     —     —    (70,094  —     —    (70,094

Sale of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    72  72   —     —    72   —     —     —    363   —     —     —     —     —    363   —     —    363 

Loss on sale of treasury stock

  —    (18  —     —     —     —     —    (18  —     —    (18  —    (68  —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (68  —     —    (68

Cancellation of treasury stock

  —    (24,218 (41,704 65,922   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Share-based payment transactions

  —    (129  —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (129  —     —    (129

Transfer from other reserves to retained earnings

  —     —    40,726   —    23,432   —    (64,158  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Others

  —    550   —     —     —     —     —    550   —     —    550   —    (41 117   —     —     —     —     —     —    76   —    (819 (743
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2016

 2,337,896  863,503  4,186,683  18,985  1,756,634  216,336  (175,381 9,204,656  1,537,548  299,895  11,042,099 

Balance at March 31, 2019

 ¥2,339,443  ¥726,012  ¥5,715,101  ¥(16,302 ¥72,425  ¥—    ¥1,730,607  ¥—    ¥113,334  ¥10,680,620  ¥494,123  ¥598,703  ¥11,773,446 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income:

                        

Net profit

  —     —    627,870   —     —     —     —    627,870  104,787  7,929  740,586   —     —    200,052   —     —     —     —     —     —    200,052  18,567  12,364  230,983 

Other comprehensive income

  —     —     —    3,789  173,260  (34,962  —    142,087  (563  —    141,524 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  —     —     —     —    (62,284  —    (190,765  —    (85,074 (338,123 (2,710  —    (340,833
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —     —    627,870  3,789  173,260  (34,962  —    769,957  104,224  7,929  882,110 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Issuance of other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    149,916  149,916 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries andbusinesses-net

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    14,888   —    14,888 

Transaction withnon-controlling interest shareholders

  —     —    26   —     —     —     —    26  437   —    463 

Dividends to shareholders

  —     —    (205,083  —     —     —     —    (205,083 (65,956  —    (271,039

Coupons on other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (7,929 (7,929

Redemption of preferred securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (86,140  —    (86,140

Purchase of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    (100 (100  —     —    (100

Sale of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    162,568  162,568   —     —    162,568 

Loss on sale of treasury stock

  —    (2  —     —     —     —     —    (2  —     —    (2

Others

  —    551   —     —     —     —     —    551   —    (102 449 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2017

 2,337,896  864,052  4,609,496  22,774  1,929,894  181,374  (12,913 9,932,573  1,505,001  449,709  11,887,283 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income:

           

Net profit

  —     —    759,998   —     —     —     —    759,998  119,878  9,722  889,598 

Other comprehensive income

  —     —     —    51,273  192,366  (55,387  —    188,252  6,594   —    194,846 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —     —    759,998  51,273  192,366  (55,387  —    948,250  126,472  9,722  1,084,444 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

  —     —    200,052   —    (62,284  —    (190,765  —    (85,074 (138,071 15,857  12,364  (109,850
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Issuance of shares under share-based payment transactions

 847  848   —     —     —     —     —    1,695   —     —    1,695  522  522   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1,044   —     —    1,044 

Issuance of other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    149,916  149,916   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    84,951  84,951 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries andbusinesses-net

  —     —    (1,190 1,190   —     —     —     —    (204,257  —    (204,257  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    5,936   —    5,936 

Transaction withnon-controlling interest shareholders

  —     —    62   —     —     —     —    62  2,440   —    2,502   —    498   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    498  11   —    509 

Dividends to shareholders

  —     —    (218,596  —     —     —     —    (218,596 (61,676  —    (280,272  —     —    (255,835  —     —     —     —     —     —    (255,835 (16,921  —    (272,756

Coupons on other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (9,722 (9,722  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (12,364 (12,364

Redemption of preferred securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (135,000  —    (135,000  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (436,500  —    (436,500

Purchase of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    (142 (142  —     —    (142  —     —     —    (100,089  —     —     —     —     —    (100,089  —     —    (100,089

Sale of treasury stock

  —     —     —     —     —     —    562  562   —     —    562   —     —     —    733   —     —     —     —     —    733   —     —    733 

Loss on sale of treasury stock

  —    (41  —     —     —     —     —    (41  —     —    (41  —     —    (250  —     —     —     —     —     —    (250  —     —    (250

Cancellation of treasury stock

  —     —    (101,674 101,674   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Share-based payment transactions

  —    (1,354  —     —     —     —     —    (1,354  —     —    (1,354  —    1,565   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1,565  (1,610  —    (45

Transfer from other reserves to retained earnings

  —     —    52,523   —    (12,694  —    (39,829  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Others

  —     —    (577 865   —     —     —    288   —    (103 185   —    (46 (63  —     —     —     —     —     —    (109 (600 822  113 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

 ¥2,338,743  ¥863,505  ¥5,149,193  ¥76,102  ¥2,122,260  ¥125,987  ¥(12,493 ¥10,663,297  ¥1,232,980  ¥599,522  ¥12,495,799 

Balance at March 31, 2020

 ¥2,339,965  ¥728,551  ¥5,609,854  ¥(13,984 ¥(2,553 ¥—    ¥1,500,013  ¥—    ¥28,260  ¥10,190,106  ¥60,296  ¥684,476  ¥10,934,878 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  Equity excluding other reserves  Other reserves             
  Capital
stock
  Capital
surplus
  Retained
earnings
  Treasury
stock
  Remeasure-
ments of
defined
benefit
plans
reserve
  Available-
for-sale
financial
assets
reserve
  Financial
instruments at
fair value
through other
comprehensive
income reserve
  Own credit
on financial
liabilities
designated
at fair value
through

profit or  loss
reserve
  Exchange
differences on
translating
foreign
operations
reserve
  Equity
attributable
to SMFG’s
shareholders
  Non-
controlling
interests
  Equity
attributable to
other equity
instruments
holders
  Total equity 
  (In millions) 

Balance at March 31, 2020

 ¥2,339,965  ¥728,551  ¥5,609,854  ¥(13,984 ¥(2,553 ¥—    ¥1,500,013  ¥—    ¥28,260  ¥10,190,106  ¥60,296  ¥684,476  ¥10,934,878 

Comprehensive income:

             

Net profit

  —     —     687,483   —     —     —     —     —     —     687,483   4,471   13,122   705,076 

Other comprehensive income

  —     —     —     —     228,376   —     642,910   (3,455  85,386   953,217   439   —     953,656 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  —     —     687,483   —     228,376   —     642,910   (3,455  85,386   1,640,700   4,910   13,122   1,658,732 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of shares under share-based payment transactions

  1,309   1,309   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     2,618   —     —     2,618 

Issuance of other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     99,943   99,943 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries and businesses-net

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     2,351   —     2,351 

Transaction with non-controlling interest shareholders

  —     (107  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (107  212   —     105 

Share of changes in capital surplus of associates and joint ventures

  —     (5,921  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (5,921  —     —     (5,921

Dividends to shareholders

  —     —     (267,144  —     —     —     —     —     —     (267,144  (1,245  —     (268,389

Coupons on other equity instruments

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (13,122  (13,122

Redemption of other equity instruments

  —     (36  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (36  —     (129,964  (130,000

Purchase of other equity instruments and sale of other equity instruments-net

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (5,919  (5,919

Purchase of treasury stock

  —     —     —     (62  —     —     —     —     —     (62  —     —     (62

Sale of treasury stock

  —     —     —     347   —     —     —     —     —     347   —     —     347 

Loss on sale of treasury stock

  —     —     (65  —     —     —     —     —     —     (65  —     —     (65

Share-based payment transactions

  —     (1,201  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (1,201  —     —     (1,201

Transfer from other reserves to retained earnings

  —     —     48,080   —     (11,412  —     (36,668  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     1,855   —     1,855 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2021

 ¥2,341,274  ¥722,595  ¥6,078,208  ¥(13,699 ¥214,411  ¥—    ¥2,106,255  ¥(3,455 ¥113,646  ¥11,559,235  ¥68,379  ¥648,536  ¥12,276,150 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows

 

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Operating Activities:

      

Profit before tax

 ¥1,118,976  ¥880,352  ¥1,325,700  ¥956,478  ¥282,751  ¥831,892 

Adjustments for:

      

Gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities

 (274,371 (112,008 (235,415 (321,635 (42,600 (5,888

Foreign exchange losses

 16,612  241,570  556,073 

Foreign exchange (gains) losses

 (567,088 179,888  181,023 

Provision for loan losses

 126,623  141,457  118,750  277,085  249,478  122,927 

Depreciation and amortization

 310,179  301,638  255,971  310,100  317,074  218,915 

Share ofpost-tax profit of associates and joint ventures

 (49,323 (29,318 (31,056 (36,373 (24,031 (40,157

Net changes in assets and liabilities:

      

Net increase of term deposits with original maturities over three months

 (210,821 (57,503 (11,071

Net (increase) decrease of term deposits with original maturities over three months

 (198,423 (255,988 199,313 

Net (increase) decrease of call loans and bills bought

 4,436  (640,331 (18,233 (1,575,396 1,509,361  (596,424

Net (increase) decrease of reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 372,563  (698,940 (1,040,858 1,913,956  (3,428,875 (1,862,136

Net (increase) decrease of loans and advances

 354,622  (6,267,726 (2,258,824

Net change of trading assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments

 283,731  (250,579 (837,291

Net increase of loans and advances

 (3,074,515 (4,528,736 (3,368,911

Net change of trading assets and liabilities, derivative financial instruments, and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

 424,587  (142,660 (901,481

Net increase of deposits

 5,881,032  4,505,200  8,230,157  16,707,952  4,375,139  5,129,513 

Net increase (decrease) of call money and bills sold

 (778,412 911,525  (4,615,144 (2,395,948 2,462,341  126,395 

Net increase (decrease) of repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 2,735,586  2,610,655  (1,974,347

Net increase (decrease) of other unsubordinated borrowings and debt securities in issue

 991,110  2,437,331  (1,499,201

Net increase of repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 3,143,567  2,588,673  879,734 

Net increase of other unsubordinated borrowings and debt securities in issue

 2,832,020  4,612,574  2,073,280 

Income taxes paid—net

 (105,880 (337,299 (297,767 (135,708 (285,779 (283,761

Other operating activities—net

 395,318  104,575  420,231  61,700  1,014,624  81,599 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities

 11,171,981  3,740,599  (1,912,325

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities

 18,322,359  8,883,234  2,785,833 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Investing Activities:

      

Purchases of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss andavailable-for-sale financial assets

 (22,488,127 (19,640,194 (25,968,442

Proceeds from sale of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss andavailable-for-sale financial assets

 13,384,847  13,460,988  22,597,455 

Proceeds from maturities of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss andavailable-for-sale financial assets

 6,265,527  6,604,279  6,072,497 

Purchases ofheld-to-maturity investments

 (2,001  —    (266,243

Proceeds from maturities ofheld-to-maturity investments

 792,358  1,093,887  1,394,921 

Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired

 (160,862 (199,356 2,249,594 

Purchases of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities

 (40,140,112 (34,178,930 (25,077,310

Proceeds from sale of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities

 16,994,681  23,114,463  17,705,865 

Proceeds from maturities of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities

 15,692,233  8,274,856  8,922,752 

Acquisitions of the subsidiaries and businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired

 (3,570 (15,942 37,966 

Investments in associates and joint ventures

 (7,744 (16,494 (62,334 (57,681 (2,860 (102,830

Disposal of subsidiaries and businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents disposed

 (852,179  —     —     —    26,799  157,507 

Proceeds from sale of investments in associates and joint ventures

 19,415  14,696  762  362  1,947  101,359 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment, and investment properties

 (710,838 (491,444 (529,151 (111,642 (83,949 (508,835

Purchases of intangible assets

 (136,100 (145,001 (158,888 (178,281 (147,939 (139,305

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment, investment properties and intangible assets

 302,027  169,027  148,650  23,147  19,119  104,403 

Other investing activities—net

  —    1,192  6,697  1  (283 (2
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) investing activities

 (3,593,677 851,580  5,485,518  (7,780,862 (2,992,719 1,201,570 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financing Activities:

      

Proceeds from issuance of subordinated borrowings

  —     —    18,000 

Redemption of subordinated borrowings

 (10,000 (11,000 (40,262  —    (8,000 (8,000

Proceeds from issuance of subordinated bonds

 104,866  244,315  276,949  90,135  54,303   —   

Redemption of subordinated bonds

 (180,034 (371,640 (186,785 (361,820 (113,000 (26,721

Payments for the principal portion of lease liabilities(1)

 (95,586 (95,386  —   

Redemption of preferred securities

 (135,000 (86,887 (142,000  —    (436,500 (299,239

Proceeds from issuance of other equity instruments

 149,916  149,887  299,895  99,943  84,951   —   

Redemption of other equity instruments

 (130,000  —     —   

Dividends paid to shareholders of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.

 (218,569 (205,078 (211,952 (267,119 (255,771 (245,595

Dividends paid tonon-controlling interest shareholders

 (62,529 (65,860 (76,744 (1,245 (16,921 (77,180

Coupons paid to other equity instruments holders

 (9,722 (7,929 (2,773 (13,122 (12,364 (11,875

Purchase of treasury stock and proceeds from sale of treasury stock—net

 379  179,657  (137 220  (99,605 (69,800

Purchase of other equity instruments and proceeds from sale of other equity instruments—net

 (103 (102  —    (5,919 822  (819

Transactions withnon-controlling interest shareholders—net

 (6 386  156  100  (234,159 7,837 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents used in financing activities

 (360,802 (174,251 (65,653 (684,413 (1,131,630 (731,392
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 (45,865 (300,075 (489,331 488,072  (271,873 44,062 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase of cash and cash equivalents

 7,171,637  4,117,853  3,018,209  10,345,156  4,487,012  3,300,073 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 46,244,819  42,126,966  39,108,757  61,203,541  56,716,529  53,416,456 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 ¥53,416,456  ¥46,244,819  ¥42,126,966  ¥71,548,697  ¥61,203,541  ¥56,716,529 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities includes:

   

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities includes:

   

Interest and dividends received

 ¥2,249,000  ¥2,025,371  ¥1,996,686  ¥1,955,515  ¥2,543,771  ¥2,501,705 

Interest paid

 711,432  484,362  421,765  435,205  1,111,439  1,092,458 

 

(1)

Upon the adoption of IFRS 16 “Leases” on April 1, 2019, payments for the principal portion of lease liabilities previously classified within “Operating activities” have been reclassified to “Financing activities.” We have not restated the amount for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 as permitted by IFRS 16.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1

GENERAL INFORMATION

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (“SMFG”(the “Company” or the “Company”“SMFG”) was established on December 2, 2002, as a holding company for Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (“SMBC”) and its subsidiaries through a statutory share transfer (kabushiki-iten) of all of the outstanding equity securities of SMBC in exchange for the Company’s newly issued securities. The Company is a joint stock corporation with limited liability (Kabushiki Kaisha) incorporated under the Companies Act of Japan (“Companies Act”). Upon the formation of the Company and the completion of the statutory share transfer, SMBC became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company has a primary listing on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (First Section), with further listing on the Nagoya Stock Exchange (First Section). The Company’s American Depositary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

The Company and its subsidiaries (the “SMBC Group”“Group”) offer a diverse range of financial services, including commercial banking, leasing, securities, consumer finance and other services.services together with its associates and joint ventures.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been authorized for issue by the Management Committee on June 22, 2018.28, 2021.

 

2

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the fiscal years presented, unless otherwise stated.

Basis of Preparation

Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards

The consolidated financial statements of the SMBC Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

Basis of measurement

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis except for the following:

 

trading assets and liabilities are measured at fair value;

 

derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value;

 

financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value;

 

available-for-sale financial assets

investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income are measured at fair value; and

 

liabilities and the assets recognized in consolidated statementstatements of financial position in respect of defined benefit plans are the present value of the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets.

Functional and presentation currency

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Japanese yen, which is also the Company’s functional currency. All financial information presented in Japanese yen has been rounded to the nearest million, except as otherwise indicated.

Critical accounting estimates and judgments

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the accounting policies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The notes to the consolidated financial statements set out areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions are significant to the consolidated financial statements, such as allowance for loan losses (Notes 10, 32)33), fair value of financial instruments (Note 43), impairment ofavailable-for-sale financial assets (Notes 9, 32)44), impairment of goodwillintangible assets (Note 14), provision for interest repayment (Note 20)21), retirement benefits (Note 23)24) and deferred tax assets (Note 22)23).

Refer to Note 3 “Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments” for further information.

New and Amended Accounting Standards Adopted by the SMBC Group

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, a number of amendments to standards have become effective; however, they have not resulted in any material changes to the SMBC Group’s accounting policies.

Consolidation

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities controlled by the SMBC Group. The SMBC Group controls an entity when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The SMBC Group considers all facts and circumstances whether it controls an entity.

Where the relevant activities are directed through voting or similar rights, the SMBC Group considers that it controls an entity if it has the existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the operating and financing policies of the entity, in general by having a shareholding of more than 50% of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are deemed to be substantive are taken into account when assessing whether the SMBC Group controls another entity.

Where the voting rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity, the assessment of control is more complex and requires greater use of judgment. The SMBC Group assesses whether it controls an entity considering all facts and circumstances, such as the purpose and design of the entity, the relevant activities and how to make decisions about those activities.

The SMBC Group also determines whether it is acting as an agent or a principal in assessing whether it has control of another entity. An agent is a party primarily engaged to act on behalf and for the benefit of another party or parties and therefore does not control the entity. To make such judgments, the SMBC Group considers the overall relationship, especially all of the following factors: the scope of its decision-making authority over the entity, the rights held by other parties, the remuneration to which it is entitled in accordance with the remuneration agreement, and its exposure to variability of returns from other interests that it holds in the entity.

The SMBC Group reassesses whether it controls an entity if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the elements of control.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which the SMBC Group obtains control. They are deconsolidated from the date on which the SMBC Group loses control.

The acquisition method is used to account for the business combinations including the acquisition of subsidiaries by the SMBC Group. The consideration transferred in a business combination is measured at fair

value, which is calculated as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are

measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The SMBC Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured at fair value at the acquisition date and any gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. For each business combination, the SMBC Group measures anynon-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at thenon-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. The excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred, the amount of anynon-controlling interest and the acquisition-date fair value of the SMBC Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. If the aggregate of the consideration transferred, the amount of anynon-controlling interest and the acquisition-date fair value of the SMBC Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree is less than the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, the difference is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between the SMBC Group companies are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of impairment of the asset transferred. The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been adjusted where necessary to ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the SMBC Group.

Non-controlling interests

Changes in the SMBC Group’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.

Interests in the equity of subsidiaries not attributable to the SMBC Group are reported in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position as a separate component of equity asnon-controlling interests. Profits or losses attributable tonon-controlling interests are separately reported in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Associates and joint ventures

An associate is an entity over which the SMBC Group has significant influence, but does not control the financial and operating policy decisions of the entity. Significant influence is generally presumed to exist when the SMBC Group holds 20% or more, but less than 50%, of the voting rights.

Entities that are jointly controlled by more than one party, including the SMBC Group, may be determined to be a joint venture.

The SMBC Group accounts for investments in associates and joint ventures using the equity method from the date on which they become associates or joint ventures. The SMBC Group discontinues the use of the equity method from the date on which the SMBC Group ceases to have significant influence or joint control over the investees.

Under the equity method, the SMBC Group’s investments in associates and joint ventures are initially recognized at cost. The carrying amount of the investments are subsequently increased or decreased to recognize the SMBC Group’s share of the post-acquisition profit or loss of the associate or joint venture and other movements included directly in the equity of the associate or joint venture. The SMBC Group’s share of the results of associates and joint ventures is based on the financial statements of its associates and joint ventures, adjusted to conform with the accounting policies of the SMBC Group. Profits on transactions between the SMBC Group and its associates and joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the SMBC Group’s interest in the associates or joint ventures. Losses are also eliminated to the extent of the SMBC Group’s interest in the associates or joint ventures unless the transaction provides evidence of impairment in the asset transferred.

The carrying amounts of the investments in associates and joint ventures include goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment loss) arising on the acquisition of the interests in the entities. Because goodwill arising on the acquisition of the interest in an associate or joint venture is not separately recognized, it is not tested for

impairment separately. Instead, the entire carrying amount of the investment in an associate or joint venture is tested for impairment as a single asset by comparing its recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell, with its carrying amount, whenever there is any objective evidence that the investment is impaired. An impairment loss recognized in prior periods for the investment is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount of the investment since the last impairment loss was recognized. If this is the case, the carrying amount of the investment is increased to its recoverable amount. That increase is a reversal of an impairment loss.

When the SMBC Group’s share of losses in an associate or joint venture exceeds the SMBC Group’s carrying amount of the investment, the SMBC Group does not recognize further losses, unless it has a binding obligation or has made payments on behalf of the entity.

Segment Reporting

The SMBC Group determines its operating segments based on the management approach, which requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the entity that are regularly reviewed by management, in order to allocate resources to a segment and to assess its performance.

Foreign Currency Translation

Items included in the financial statements of each of the SMBC Group companies are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the company operates (“the functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Japanese yen, which is also the Company’s functional currency.

Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions that are denominated or settled in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the retranslation and settlement of monetary items are recognized in the consolidated income statement.statements. Non-monetary items that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate at the date the fair value is determined. Translation differences on certain of these items, such as equity instruments classified asavailable-for-sale financial assets,measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, are not included in the consolidated income statementstatements but are recognized directly in equity.Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate at the date of the initial transaction.

Foreign operations

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into the presentation currency of the SMBC Group using the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period, and their income statements are translated using the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions or average exchange rates where these approximate to actual rates.

The exchange differences arising on the translation of a foreign operation are included in other comprehensive income within equity and subsequently included in profit or loss on fullthe disposal or partial disposal of the operation.

Financial Assets

At initial recognition, the financial assets of the SMBC Group are classified into one of the following categories: trading assets, derivative financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables,held-to-maturity investments andavailable-for-sale financial assets.

Regular way purchases and sales of trading assets, derivative financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss,held-to-maturity investments andavailable-for-salefinancial assets are recognized and derecognized on the trade date—the date on which the SMBC Group commits to purchase or sell the assets.

Financial assets are derecognized when the

contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or where the SMBC Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial assets at a consolidated level. The SMBC Group consolidates all subsidiaries in accordance with IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements” before determining derecognition of financial assets.

IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” requires all financial assets, under IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognitionincluding entire hybrid instruments, to be classified into three measurement categories, namely, amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) and Measurement.”fair value through profit or loss (“FVPL”), based on the business model within which they are held and their contractual cash flow characteristics.

The Group has assessed the business models based on facts and circumstances at a portfolio level. Factors that are considered in determining the business model include policies and objectives for the relevant portfolio, how the performance and risks of the portfolio are managed, evaluated and reported to management, and the level of sales activity.

The Group has assessed the contractual cash flow characteristics of financial assets with reference to whether the contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest (“SPPI”). Principal is defined as the fair value of the financial asset at initial recognition but it may change over the life of the financial asset as amounts are repaid. Interest is defined as consideration for the time value of money and the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding during a particular period of time. It can also include consideration for other basic lending risks such as liquidity risk and costs such as administrative costs associated with holding the financial asset for a particular period of time, as well as a profit margin. In assessing whether the contractual cash flows meet the conditions for SPPI, the Group considers the contractual terms of the financial asset. This includes assessing whether the financial asset contains a contractual term that could change the contractual cash flows so that it would not meet the conditions for SPPI, including leverage features, contingent events that would change the amount or timing of cash flows, contractual terms that limit the Group’s claim to cash flows from specified assets, and features that modify consideration of the time value of money.

TradingFinancial assets measured at amortized cost

Financial assets are measured at amortized cost if they are held within a business model whose objective is to hold the assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and their contractual cash flows are SPPI. These financial assets are mainly included in “Loans and advances” and also in “Investment securities” in the consolidated statements of financial position. They are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial assets, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Interest income on these financial assets using the effective interest method is recognized in “Net interest income” in the consolidated income statements.

Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income

Financial assets are measured at FVOCI if they are held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, and their contractual cash flows are SPPI. Financial assets measured at FVOCI are included in “Investment securities” in the consolidated statements of financial position. They are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial assets, and are subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of these financial assets are recognized in other comprehensive income, until they are derecognized. At the time of derecognition, the cumulative gains or losses previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss and are recognized in “Net investment income” in the consolidated income statements. Interest income calculated using the effective interest method, foreign currency gains and losses, and impairment gains and losses are recognized in “Net interest income,” “Net trading income” and “Impairment charges on financial assets” in the consolidated income statements, respectively.

In addition, the Group makes an irrevocable election at initial recognition, for particular non-trading equity instruments that would otherwise be measured at FVPL, to present subsequent changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. These financial assets are also included in “Investment securities” in the consolidated statements of financial position. They are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, and are subsequently measured at fair value. Amounts presented in other comprehensive income are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss. Dividend income on equity instruments included in these financial assets is recognized in “Net investment income” in the consolidated income statements when the entity’s right to receive payment of the dividend is established.

Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss

Any financial assets that do not meet the criteria of amortized cost or FVOCI are classified as FVPL, unless the Group makes an irrevocable election for non-trading equity instruments to be measured at FVOCI. Financial assets of the Group classified as FVPL consist of financial assets held for trading, derivatives and financial assets mandatorily measured at FVPL.

Financial assets are classified as held for trading and are included in “Trading assets” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position, if they are acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near term or if they are part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Trading assets

Derivatives which are initially recognized at fair value with transaction costs being recognized in the consolidated income statement, and subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair values of trading assets are included in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statement.

Derivative financialnot designated as hedging instruments

Derivatives are classified as held for trading, unless theyand all derivatives are designated as hedging instruments, and included in “Derivative financial instruments” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. All derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative. Derivatives

Financial assets mandatorily measured at FVPL, other than those held for trading and derivatives, are included in “Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated statements of financial position.

The financial assets mentioned above are initially recognized at fair value with transaction costs being recognized in the consolidated income statement,profit or loss, and are subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair values of trading assets and derivatives held for trading, and interest and dividend income on trading assets are included in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statement.

The derivative component of a hybrid instrument containing both a derivative andnon-derivative component (“host contract”) is referred to as an embedded derivative. Certain embedded derivatives are accounted for as separate derivatives, when their economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract and the hybrid instrument is not carried at fair value through profitstatements. Gains or loss. These embedded derivatives are measured at fair value and are presented in the consolidated statement of financial position together with the host contract.

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

Financial assets, other than those held for trading, are classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and are included in “Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated statement of financial position, if they meet one of the following criteria, and are so designated by management:

the designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency;

a group of financial assets is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy; or

the instrument contains one or more embedded derivatives unless (a) the embedded derivative does not significantly modify the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the contract or (b) it is clear with little or no analysis that separation is prohibited.

In addition, the SMBC Group classifies the entire hybrid instrument at fair value through profit or loss when the SMBC Group is required to separate an embedded derivative from its host contract, but is unable to measure the embedded derivative separately either at acquisition or at the end of a subsequent reporting period. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value with transaction costs being recognized in the consolidated income statement, and subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of such financial assets mandatorily measured at FVPL are included in “Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables arenon-derivativeAdditionally, financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market, other than:

those that the SMBC Group intends to sell immediately or in the near term, which are classified as held for trading, and those that the SMBC Group upon initial recognition designates as at fair value through profit or loss;

those that the SMBC Group upon initial recognition classifies asavailable-for-sale; or

those for which the SMBC Group may not recover substantially all of its initial investment, other than because of credit deterioration.

The financial assets classified as loans and receivables are mainly included in “Loans and advances” in the consolidated statement of financial position. Loans and receivables are initially recognized at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

When the SMBC Group is the lessor in a lease agreement that transfers substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the asset to the lessee, the arrangement is classified as a finance lease and a receivable equal to the net investment in the lease is recognized and presented within “Loans and advances” in the consolidated statement of financial position.

Held-to-maturity investments

Held-to-maturity investments arenon-derivative financial assets quoted in an active market with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that the SMBC Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. If the SMBC Group were to sell other than an insignificant amount ofheld-to-maturity investments, the remaining investments in this category wouldFVOCI can be reclassified asavailable-for-sale financial assets.Held-to-maturity investments are initially recognized at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets arenon-derivative financial assets that are classified asavailable-for-saledesignated at initial recognition or are not classified into any of the other categories described above.Available-for-sale financial assets are initially recognized at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, and are subsequentlyto be measured at fair value.

Gains and losses arising from changesFVPL in the fair value ofavailable-for-sale financial assets are recognized in other comprehensive income, until they are derecognizedorder to eliminate or impaired. At that time, the cumulative gainsignificantly reduce a measurement or lossrecognition inconsistency. The Group does not make this designation.

previously recognized in other comprehensive income is recognized in the consolidated income statement. However, interest income calculated using the effective interest method and foreign currency gains and losses on monetary assets classified asavailable-for-sale are recognized in the consolidated income statement. Dividends onavailable-for-sale equity instruments are recognized in the consolidated income statement when the entity’s right to receive payment is established.

Financial Liabilities

Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost

Financial liabilities, except for held for tradingfinancial liabilities measured at FVPL, are mainly included in “Deposits,” “Borrowings,” and derivatives,“Debt securities in issue” in the consolidated statements of financial position. They are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred, including premiums, discountsthat are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liabilities, and issuance costs, andare subsequently measured at amortized cost based onusing the effective interest method. FinancialInterest expense on these financial liabilities carriedmeasured at amortized cost are mainly “Deposits,” “Borrowings,” and “Debt securitiesusing the effective interest method is recognized in issue” included“Net interest income” in the consolidated statementincome statements.

Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss

Financial liabilities measured at FVPL consist of financial position.liabilities held for trading, derivatives whose fair values are negative and financial liabilities designated at FVPL.

Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are incurred principally for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term or if they are part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Financial liabilities held for trading and derivatives are mainly included in “Trading liabilities” and “Derivative financial instruments,” respectively, in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. Trading liabilities and derivatives are initially measuredrecognized at fair value with transaction costs being recognized in the consolidated income statement,profit or loss, and are subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair values of such trading liabilities and derivativesinterest expense on trading liabilities are included in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

For derivatives other than the component of hybrid instrument, refer to “Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss.”

The derivative component of a hybrid instrument containing both a derivative and non-derivative component (“host contract”) is referred to as an embedded derivative. Certain embedded derivatives are accounted for as separated derivatives, when their economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract, a separated instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative and the hybrid instrument is not carried at FVPL. These embedded derivatives are measured at fair value, while the host contracts are measured at amortized cost. These embedded derivatives are presented in the consolidated statements of financial position together with the host contract.

From April 1, 2020, the Group adopted a fair value option for certain financial liabilities which were issued by the Group’s securities subsidiary. As part of risk management, the Group enters into derivative transactions to offset the profit or loss of financial liabilities containing embedded derivatives, designated at FVPL under the fair value option. The Group can make an irrevocable election for each individual financial liability at initial recognition to designate it as measured at FVPL, if it meets one of the following criteria:

The designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as “an accounting mismatch”) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains and losses on them on different bases;

A group of financial liabilities or financial assets and financial liabilities is managed, and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy, and information about the group is provided internally on that basis to the board of directors; or

The financial liability contains one or more embedded derivatives which significantly modify the cash flows and it is not clear with no analysis that separation is prohibited.

The financial liabilities designated at FVPL are presented as “Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated statements of financial position. Those liabilities are initially recognized at fair value with transaction costs being recognized in profit or loss, and are subsequently measured at fair value. The amount of changes in their fair values that is attributable to changes in own credit risk of the liabilities is recognized in other comprehensive income and subsequently not transferred to profit or loss. The amount of changes in their fair values except for the effects of changes in their own credit risk, gains or losses on derecognition and interest expense are included in “Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated income statements.

Financial liabilities are derecognized when they have been redeemed or otherwise extinguished.

Hedge Accounting

On April 1, 2017, the SMBCThe Group started to applyapplies fair value hedge accounting and hedge accounting of net investments in foreign operations, in order to reflect the effect of risk management activities on its consolidated financial statements.

Fair value hedges

The Group applies fair value hedge accounting in order to reflect in its consolidated financial statements the effect of risk management activities to mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate debt securities in issue and borrowings arising from changes in interest rates. The Group designates interest rate swaps as hedging instruments. Changes in fair values of hedging instruments are recognized in the consolidated income statements, together with changes in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. The fair value changes adjust the carrying amount of the hedged item. If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting for reasons other than the derecognition of the hedged item, the adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortized to profit or loss over the period to maturity of the hedged item. When the hedged item is derecognized, the adjustment is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statements.

The Group also applies fair value hedge accounting in order to reflect in its consolidated financial statements the effect of risk management activities to mitigate the risk of changes in fair values of certain equity instruments elected to be measured at FVOCI. The Group designates equity derivatives as hedging instruments. Both the effective portion and ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments are recognized in other comprehensive income, and amounts presented in other comprehensive income are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss.

Hedges of net investments in foreign operations

The Group applies hedge accounting of net investments in foreign operations in order to reflect in its consolidated financial statements the effect of risk management activities to mitigate the foreign currency risk onof exchange differences arising from the translation of net investments in foreign operations. The SMBC Group usesdesignates currency derivatives and foreign currency denominated financial liabilities as hedging instruments. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instruments is recognized in other comprehensive income, whereas the ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instruments is recognized in net“Net trading incomeincome” in the consolidated income statement.statements. The cumulative gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income is recognized in thereclassified to profit or loss on the disposal or partial disposal of the foreign operation. operations.

For further information about hedge accounting, see Note 7 “Derivative Financial Instruments—Instruments and Hedge Accounting—Hedge accounting.”

Interest Rate Benchmark Reform

The Group early adopted “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform, Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7” for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The amendments provide reliefs from applying specific hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships directly affected by the interest rate benchmark reform only if the reform gives rise to uncertainties. The reliefs aim to ensure that the interest rate benchmark reform does not result in the discontinuance of hedge accounting. In accordance with the transition provisions, the amendments have been adopted retrospectively to hedging relationships that existed at the beginning of the reporting period or were designated thereafter. The reliefs adopted by the Group are described below.

Prospective assessments

The Group has assumed that the interest rate benchmarks on which the hedged risk or the cash flows of the hedging instrument is based are not altered as a result of the interest rate benchmark reform in assessing whether there is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument.

Hedge of a non-contractually specified benchmark component of an interest rate

The Group has assessed whether a non-contractually specified benchmark component of interest rate risk designated as a hedged item is separately identifiable only at the inception of the hedging relationship.

Offsetting Financial Instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position, only if the SMBC Group currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts and intends to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. In all other situations, they are presented on a gross basis.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining the fair value, the SMBC Group gives the highest priority to a quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. A market is regarded as active if transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. If there is no active market for the asset or liability, the SMBC Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are

available to measure the fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs. In cases where the SMBC Group manages a group of financial assets and financial liabilities on the basis of its net credit risk exposure, the fair value of the group of financial assets and financial liabilities is measured on the basis of the price that would be received to sell a net long position (i.e., an asset) or paid to transfer a net short position (i.e., a liability) for the credit risk exposure provided that certain criteria set forth in IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement” are met. Details of fair value measurement are described in Note 4344 “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities.”

Recognition of Deferred Day One Profit and Loss

The best evidence of the fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition is normally the transaction price (i.e., the fair value of the consideration given or received). However, if the fair value at initial recognition is not evidenced by a quoted price in an active market for an identical asset or liability nor based on a valuation technique that uses only data from observable markets, the difference between the fair value at initial recognition and the transaction price, commonly referred to as “day one profit and loss,” is not recognized as a gain or loss but is adjusted to be deferred.

The SMBC Group didhas certain financial instruments, such as derivatives, hybrid financial instruments and certain loans and advances classified as FVPL where fair value is determined using valuation techniques for which not have any significantall inputs are observable in a market. Such a financial instrument is initially recognized at the transaction price which may be different from the fair value, and the day one profit and loss is not recognized as a gain or loss.

The timing of recognition of the deferred day one profit and loss foris determined on an instrument by instrument basis. It is either amortized over the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.life of the transaction, deferred until fair value of the instrument can be determined using data from observable markets, or realized due to redemption or sales of the instrument.

Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements, and Securities Borrowing and Lending Agreements

In the ordinary course of business, the SMBC Group lends or sells securities under agreements to repurchase them at a predetermined price on a future date (“repos”). Since substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the SMBC Group, the securities remain on the consolidated statementstatements of financial position and a liability is recorded in respect of the consideration received. On the other hand, the SMBC Group borrows or purchases securities

under agreements to resell them at a predetermined price on a future date (“reverse repos”). Since the SMBC Group does not retain the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial assets, these transactions are treated as collateralized loans and the securities are not included in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position.

The Group measures repos and reverse repos at amortized cost. The difference between the sale and purchase price is accrued over the life of the transactions. Securities lent to counterparties remain on the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. Securities borrowed are not recognized in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position, unless these are sold to third parties, at which point the obligation to repurchase the securities is recorded as a trading liabilitymeasured at fair value and included in “Trading liabilities” in the consolidated statements of financial position and any subsequent gain or loss is included in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, there were no transactions pursuant to repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or other transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase such transferred assets that were treated as sales and hence derecognized for accounting purposes.

Impairment of Financial Assets

LoansThe ECL model is used for the recognition of impairment loss under IFRS 9. The ECL model applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost, and advancesdebt instruments at FVOCI, lease receivables, certain loan commitments andheld-to-maturity investments financial guarantee contracts. Under the ECL model, an entity is required to account for expected credit losses from initial recognition of financial instruments and to recognize full lifetime expected losses on a timely basis.

Determining significant increase in credit risk

At the end of each reporting period, the SMBC Group assesses whether there is any objective evidence thatdate, credit risk on a financial asset is assessed and a loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to the ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months, if the credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition (“Stage 1”). A loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to the ECL resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial assets which are assessed to have experienced a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition (“Stage 2”) or the credit-impaired financial assets (“Stage 3”). The expected life of a groupfinancial asset is the maximum contractual period over which it is exposed to credit risk. However, for certain revolving facilities including both a loan and an undrawn component, such as retail overdrafts and credit card facilities, the contractual ability to demand repayment and cancel the undrawn commitment does not limit the exposure to credit losses to the contractual notice period. The expected life of these revolving facilities is derived from the behavioral life calculated based on historical data.

Assessments on significant increases in credit risk are performed on an individual financial asset basis. The Group performs ECL recognition and measurement on a collective basis or an individual basis using reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort, such as asset type, credit risk ratings, collateral collectability, past-due status and other relevant characteristics of financial instruments.

The Group determines whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk by comparing the risk of a default occurring on a financial instrument at the reporting date with that at the date of initial recognition, based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. As for the quantitative assessment, the Group measures increase of probability of default (“PD”) since initial recognition. If an obligor gets downgraded to a certain degree which reflects an increase of PD exceeding the threshold defined, a significant increase in credit risk is recognized. For example, origination obligor grade getting down by one to four grades is taken as a significant increase in credit risk where PD has increased since initial recognition. Numbers of obligor grade deterioration taken to identify significant increase in credit risk depend on credit quality at origination. The origination obligor grade with lower

credit rating takes less downgrades to identify significant increase in credit risk than those with higher credit rating, due to the difference in increase of PD. Refer to Note 46 “Financial Risk Management” for information on obligor grading system of SMBC. As for the qualitative assessment, the Group evaluates credit risk characteristics of financial assets in accordance with the Group’s credit risk management practices. For example, certain financial assets that meet high credit risk criteria are transferred to Stage 2 from Stage 1. Moreover, financial assets whose principal and/or interest payments are more than 30 days past due are transferred to Stage 2. If there is impaired.no longer any observation of a significant increase in credit risk, the financial instrument will be transferred to Stage 1.

Determining credit-impaired financial assets

A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impairedcredit-impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result ofclassified to Stage 3 when one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a “loss event”) and that loss event (or events) has anhave a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of thethat financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.

have occurred. The criteria that the SMBC Group uses to determine that therea financial asset is objective evidence of an impairment losscredit-impaired include:

 

significant financial difficulty of an issuer or an obligor;a borrower;

a default or delinquency as more than 90 days past due in interest or principal payments;

 

restructuring of a financial asset by the SMBC Group due to the borrower’s financial difficulties on terms that the SMBC Group would not otherwise consider;difficulties;

 

indications that a borrower or issuer will enter bankruptcy; and

 

the disappearance of an active market for a securitythat financial asset because of the borrower’s financial difficulties;difficulties.

If a financial asset is no longer credit-impaired, it will be transferred to Stage 2 or Stage 1.

The definition of default used for ECL recognition and

other observable data relating measurement is consistent with that used for the Group’s internal credit risk management purposes. The Group manages credit risk with an internal credit rating system, which is consisted of the borrower categories to a groupsubstandard borrowers, potentially bankrupt borrowers, virtually bankrupt borrowers, and bankrupt borrowers defined as default for ECL application (see Note 46 “Financial Risk Management”).

Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (“POCI”) are financial assets considered credit-impaired at the time of assets, suchinitial recognition. They are measured at fair value on initial recognition and therefore no credit loss allowance is initially recognized. Subsequently, lifetime expected credit losses for POCI are measured as adversethe difference between the financial asset’s amortized cost and the present value of future cash flows discounted at the financial asset’s credit-adjusted effective interest rate determined at initial recognition. Moreover, changes in the payment statuslifetime expected credit losses are recognized as impairment charges.

Measurement of borrowers or issuers in the group, or national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults in the group.

Expected Credit Losses

The SMBC Group first assesses whether objective evidencemeasures ECL of impairment exists individually fora financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If the SMBC Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a groupway that reflects an unbiased and probability-weighted amount, the time value of money, and reasonable and supportable information that is available at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.

The ECL models have been built by leveraging the PD, loss given default (“LGD”) and exposure at default (“EAD”) used in the Basel III regulatory framework, for instance by adjusting certain conservative factors in those PDs and LGDs. For financial assets with similar credit risk characteristicsat Stage 1 and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairmentStage 2, the Group uses the 12-month PDs developed to measure 12-month ECL and for which an impairment loss is or continuesthe lifetime PDs developed to be recognized are not included in the collective assessment of impairment.

The allowance for individually significant impairedmeasure lifetime ECL respectively, and considers forward-looking macroeconomic information. For financial assets is measured byat Stage 3, the Group applies the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method whichfor individually significant credit-impaired financial assets. For credit-impaired financial assets that are not individually significant, the Group applies the same formula used for Stage 2 with PD

set at 100%. For portfolios where the above ECL models are not applicable, the Group adjusts historical data, such as credit loss experience, with current observable data to reflect the effects of current conditions and forecasts to reflect the possible effect of future conditions.

The DCF method is used to calculatemeasure the ECL, which is the difference between the financial asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. If financial assets have a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the effective interest rate determined under the contract, for the current period. The estimated future cash flows are individually calculated taking into account factors including historical loss information, the appropriateness of the borrower’s business plan or operational improvement plan, the status of progress of its plan, the overall support from financial institutions, and the realizable value of any collateral held. Cash flows are probability-weighted by reference to different scenarios.

The collective allowance for financial assetsGroup incorporates forward-looking information into the ECL measurement by obligor grading, macroeconomic factors and additional ECL adjustments as appropriate. Obligor-specific forward-looking information is classified into two types: (1)reflected in the allowance for impaired financial assets that are not individually significant, and (2) the allowance fornon-impaired financial assets, which reflects incurred but not yet identified (“IBNI”) losses for the period between the impairment occurring and the loss being identified. The collective allowance is estimated by applying historical loss experienceobligor grade as a qualitative assessment. Refer to groups of homogenous loans. The historical loss experience data includes the number of borrowers for whom objective evidence of impairment has been identified for the most recent rollingone-year period, and the amount ultimately recovered from impaired financial assets. The SMBC Group has collected and accumulated historical data on amounts ultimately recovered from impaired financial assets. The homogeneous groups are determined on the basis of similar credit risk characteristics. For every group, the SMBC Group’s grading processes are established considering asset type, industry, geographical location, collateral type,past-due status and other relevant characteristics (see Note 4546 “Financial Risk Management”). These characteristics for information on obligor grading system of SMBC. To incorporate forward-looking information into the ECL models, the Group introduces an approach based on multiple scenarios. In this approach, three scenarios (base, upside and downside scenarios) are relevantmodelled to ensure an unbiased ECL calculation. Information considered in the estimation of future cash flows for groups of such assets as being indicativedevelopment of the debtors’ ability to pay all amounts due according to the contractual termsbase scenario is aligned with information used for strategic planning, budgeting and risk management of the assets being evaluated. Historical loss experienceGroup, and includes not only internal information but external information including economic data and forecasts publicly provided by Japanese governmental bodies, research institutes of the private-sector and international organizations conducting economic analysis and projections. The downside scenario is adjustedthe adverse scenario and based on the basis of current observable data, including bankruptcy trends afterstressed business environments such as serious economic recession and financial market disruption. Both the occurrence of significant eventsdownside scenario and the upside scenario, which had a negative effectis the favorable scenario, are developed based on the global economypremises of the base scenario and the economiespast macroeconomic experiences. The Group has lower weights for the downside scenario and the upside scenario compared with the base scenario. Furthermore, additional ECL adjustments are applied in which a large portioncases where known or expected risk factors or information have not been specifically considered in the ECL model and thus the ECL does not fully reflect current circumstances, events or conditions at relevant portfolio level.

The Group has identified the key macroeconomic drivers impacting the credit risks and losses in each major portfolio of financial assets and has estimated relationships between those key drivers and credit risks and losses using an analysis of historical data. For domestic and foreign loans to wholesale customers, the key drivers for credit risks and losses are the growth rates of Japanese and global gross domestic product (“GDP”). For domestic loans to retail customers, the Japanese unemployment rate is applied as the key driver. Outcomes of the SMBC Group’s assetsanalysis are located, to reflect the effects of current conditions that did not affect the period on which the historicalincorporated into PD for ECL recognition and measurement in a probability-weighted way.

ECLs are recognized through loss experience is based and to remove the effects of conditions in the historical period that do not currently exist.

The carrying amount of the asset is reduced by the impairment loss either directly or through the use of an allowance account.accounts. Changes in the carrying amount of the loss allowance accountaccounts are recognized in the consolidated income statement. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized (such as an improvement in the

debtor’s credit rating), the previously recognized impairment gain or loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognizedand included in “Impairment charges on financial assets” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

If a financial asset is determined to be uncollectible, it is written off against the related allowance account.for loan impairment. Uncollectible financial assets are normally written off when there is no reasonable expectation of further recovery after any collateral is foreclosed and the amount of the loss has been determined. Those assets primarily include loans forto borrowers that have been legally or formally declared bankrupt and borrowers that may not have been legally or formally declared bankrupt but are essentially bankrupt.

Loans and advances that would otherwise be past due or impaired, but whoseIf contractual terms of a loan have been renegotiated without providing any financial concessions, are not classified as impaired loans and advances as the terms of the renegotiated loans and advances do not result in a decrease in the net present value of the loan discounted at its original effective interest rate. The collective allowance is estimated for these loans and advances by including them in homogenous groups on the basis of applying the SMBC Group’s grading process, taking into account the renegotiation and their consequent higher risk status. These loans and advances are continually assessed for impairment until maturity or derecognition.

In addition, provisions for loan commitments are calculated wheremodified, it is probablerequired to recalculate the gross carrying amount of that the SMBC Group will incurloan and recognize a loss and recognized in other provisions (see Note 20 “Provisions”).

Available-for-sale financial assets

At the end of each reporting period, the SMBC Group assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial assetmodification gain or a group of financial assets is impaired. In the case of equity instruments classified asavailable-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the instruments below cost is also considered in determining whether the assets are impaired. In the case of debt instruments classified asavailable-for-sale, impairment is assessed based on the same criteria as for loans and advances andheld-to-maturity investments. If any objective evidence of impairment exists foravailable-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss—measured as the difference between the cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss—loss. Moreover, it is removed from equityrequired to assess whether there has been a significant increase since initial recognition and recognizedthe Group conducts analysis to monitor the

change in the consolidated income statement.

Impairment losses recognized in the consolidated income statement on equity instruments classified asavailable-for-sale are not reversed through the consolidated income statement. For debt instruments classified asavailable-for-sale,credit risk subsequent to modification. However, if the new contractual terms are considered substantially different from the existing contractual terms, a new loan will be recognized at fair value recovers in a subsequent period and it canthe existing loan will be objectively associated with an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized in the consolidated income statement, the impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated income statement.derecognized.

Property, Plant and Equipment

All property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Additions and subsequent expenditures are capitalized only to the extent that they enhance the future economic benefits expected to be derived from the assets. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation of other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:

 

Buildings: 7–50 years;

 

Leased

Right of use assets: the shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful life, which is generally 5–1–20 years; and

 

Assets for rent (including assets for aircraft leasing business) and others: 2–40 years.

The residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period. Gains and losses on disposal are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount. These are included in “Other income” and “Other expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred, the amount of anynon-controlling interest and the acquisition-date fair value of the SMBC Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, and is initially recognized at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. Impairment testing is performed at least annually and whenever there is an indication that the cash-generating unit may be impaired. When the SMBC Group disposes of all or part of a cash-generating unit to which goodwill is allocated, the goodwill associated with the cash-generating unit is included in the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit when determining the gain or loss on disposal.

Software

Purchased software is carried at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses, if any.

Expenditure on internally generated software is recognized as an asset if the SMBC Group can demonstrate its intention and ability to complete the development and use the software in a manner that will generate future economic benefits and it can reliably measure the costs to complete the development. Internally generated software is carried at capitalized cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Costs associated with maintaining software are expensed as incurred.

Software is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life, which is generally 5 to 10 years.

Contractual customer relationships and trademarks

Contractual customer relationships and trademarks acquired in a business combination are recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. Contractual customer relationships and trademarks are carried at cost less accumulated amortization or impairment losses, if any. Contractual customer relationships and trademarks are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which are generally 105 to 20 years.

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets primarily consist of leasehold rights. They are recognized only when the SMBC Group legally obtains the rights and can reliably measure the fair value. Leasehold rights have an indefinite useful life and they are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually.

Impairment ofNon-Financial Assets

Non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment at the end of each reporting period and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated income statementstatements if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. The recoverable amount

is estimated as the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset. In addition, irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment annually.

For the purposes of conducting impairment reviews, assets are grouped into cash-generating units to which the assets belong.Non-financial assets other than impaired goodwill are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment loss at the end of each reporting period. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.

Assets Held for Sale

Non-current assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through sale rather than through continuing use. In order to be classified as held for sale, the assets or disposal groups must be available for immediate sale in their present condition and their sale must be highly probable. Such assets or disposal groups are generally measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

Leases

Accounting policies applied from April 1, 2019

The Group assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease at the inception of a contract. A lease is a contract that conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

As lessee

At the commencement date, the Group recognizes a lease liability and measures it at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at that date. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, or the Group’s incremental borrowing rate if the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined. After the commencement date, the Group measures the lease liability by increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability and reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease payments made. The lease liabilities are included in “Borrowings” in the consolidated statement of financial position.

The Group also recognizes a right of use asset and measures it at cost at the commencement date. The cost of the right of use asset comprises the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability, any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs incurred.

After the commencement date, the Group measures the right of use asset applying a cost model. The right of use asset is depreciated from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right of use asset or the end of the lease term. The lease term is determined as the non-cancellable period of a lease together with both periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise that option and an option to terminate the lease if the Group is reasonably certain not to exercise that option. The right of use asset is included in “Property, plant and equipment” and “Intangible assets” in the consolidated statement of financial position, and it is presented within the same line item as that within which the corresponding underlying assets would be presented if they were owned.

As lessor

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset.

When the Group acted as a lessor in an operating lease, the underlying assets were included in “Property, plant and equipment” in the consolidated statements of financial position and were depreciated over their expected useful lives on a basis consistent with similar assets in property, plant and equipment. Lease payment from operating leases as income was recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and included in “Other income” in the consolidated income statements. Initial direct costs incurred in obtaining an operating lease were added to the carrying amount of the underlying assets and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

When the Group was a lessor in a finance lease, the lease receivables were recognized at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease and included in “Loans and advances” in the consolidated statements of financial position. Finance income was recognized over the lease term based on a pattern reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment in the finance lease and included in “Interest income” in the consolidated income statements.

Sale and leaseback

A sale and leaseback qualifies as a sale if the buyer-lessor obtains control of the underlying asset. The seller-lessee measures a right of use asset arising from the leaseback at the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the asset that relates to the right of use retained. The seller-lessee recognizes only the amount of any gain or loss that relates to the rights transferred to the buyer-lessor. If the fair value of the consideration for the sale of an asset does not equal the fair value of the asset or if the lease payments are not at market rates, the difference is accounted for as either a prepayment of lease payments (if the purchase price is below market terms) or an additional financing (if the purchase price is above market terms) to measure the sale proceeds at fair value.

Accounting policies applied until March 31, 2019

As lessee

A lease agreement in which the lessor doesdid not transfer to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of assets iswas classified as an operating lease. The leases entered into by the SMBC Group as a lessee arewere primarily operating leases. Operating lease payments, net of lease incentives received from the lessor, arewere recognized in the consolidated income statementstatements on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

A lease agreement in which the lessor transferstransferred to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of assets, with or without ultimate legal title, iswas classified as a finance lease. For finance leases, the SMBC Group initially recognizesrecognized the leased asset at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, assets arewere accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to those assets. The corresponding liability to the lessor iswas recognized as a lease obligation within “Borrowings” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. Interest expense iswas recognized over the term of the lease based on the interest rate implicit in the lease so as to give a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

As lessor

When the SMBC Group actsacted as a lessor in an operating lease, the assets for rent arewere included in “Property, plant and equipment” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position and arewere depreciated over their expected useful lives on a basis consistent with similar assets in property, plant and equipment. Income from operating leases (net of any incentives given to the lessee) iswas recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and included in “Other income” in the consolidated income statement.statements. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging an operating lease arewere added to the carrying amount of the leased assets and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

When the SMBC Group iswas a lessor in a finance lease, the leased assets arewere derecognized and the present value of the future lease payments iswas recognized as a lease receivable within “Loans and advances” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. The difference between the gross receivables, i.e., undiscounted future cash flows, and the present value of the receivables iswas recognized as unearned finance income. Finance income iswas recognized over the lease term based on a pattern reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment in the finance lease.

Sale and leaseback

For sale and leaseback transactions leading to an operating lease, and the transaction took place at fair value, any profit or loss iswas recognized immediately. If the sale price iswas at or below fair value, any profit or loss iswas recognized immediately. However, if the loss iswas compensated for by future rentals at a below market price, the loss iswas deferred and amortized over the period that the asset iswas expected to be used. If the sale price iswas above fair value, any profit iswas deferred and amortized over the useful life of the asset. If the fair value of the asset iswas less than the carrying value of the asset at the date of transaction, that difference iswas recognized immediately as a loss on the sale.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the purposes of the consolidated statementstatements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits, and other short-term highly liquid financial assets with original maturities of three months or less, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in their fair value.

Provisions

A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the SMBC Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at apre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.

Financial Guarantee Contracts

Financial guarantee contracts are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs becausewhen a specified debtor fails to make payments when due in accordance with the original

or modified terms of a debt instrument. Such financial guarantees are given to banks, financial institutions and other bodies on behalf of customers to secure loans, overdrafts and other banking facilities. Financial guarantees are initially recognized at fair value on the date the guarantee is given.

Subsequent to initial recognition, the SMBC Group’s liabilities under suchFinancial guarantees are subsequently measured at the higher of the initial measurement,loss allowance and the amount initially recognized less amortization calculated to recognizethe cumulative income recognized at the reporting date, and is included in “Other liabilities” in the consolidated income statement the fee income earned over the guarantee period, and the best estimatestatements of the expenditure required to settle any financial obligation arising at the end of the reporting period. These estimates are determined based on experience of similar transactions and history of past losses, supplemented by the judgment of management.

position. Any increasechange in the liabilityloss allowance relating to financial guarantee contracts is included in “Other expenses”“Impairment charges on financial assets” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Employee Benefits

The SMBC Group operates various retirement benefit plans and other employee benefit plans.

Retirement benefits

The SMBC Group has defined benefit plans, such as defined benefit pension plans andlump-sum severance indemnity plans, and defined contribution plans.

Defined benefit plans

The liabilities and the assets recognized in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position in respect of defined benefit plans are the present value of the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets.

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by qualified actuaries. In calculating the present value of the defined benefit obligations, the related current service cost, and past service cost, the SMBC Group attributes the retirement benefits to years of service under the benefit formula. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using market yields of AA credit-rated corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating those of the related obligations. In cases where there is no deep market in corporate bonds with a sufficiently long maturity to match the estimated maturity of the benefit payments, the SMBC Group uses current market rates of the appropriate term to discount shorter term payments and estimates the discount rates for longer maturities by extrapolating current market rates along the yield curve.

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions in the year, and return on plan assets excluding interest income are recognized in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit or loss.

Past service costs are recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement.statements.

When the calculations above result in a benefit to the SMBC Group, the recognized asset is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of any refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan. An economic benefit is available to the SMBC Group if it is realizable during the life of the plan or on settlement of the plan obligations.

Defined contribution plans

Contributions to defined contribution plans are recognized as an expense in the consolidated income statementstatements when they are due.

Other long-term employee benefits

The SMBC Group’s net obligation with respect to long-term employee benefits other than retirement benefits is the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods;

that benefit is discounted to determine its present value and the fair value of any related assets is deducted. The discount rates are market yields of AA credit-rated corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating those of the related obligations. The calculation of obligations is performed using the projected unit credit method. Any actuarial gains or losses and past service costs are recognized in the consolidated income statementstatements in the period in which they arise.

Short-term employee benefits

Short-term employee benefits, such as salaries, paid absences and other benefits are accounted for on an accrual basis over the period in which employees have provided services. Bonuses are recognized to the extent that the SMBC Group has a present obligation to its employees that can be measured reliably.

Income Tax

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred taxes. Income tax expense is recognized in the consolidated income statementstatements except for that related to items recognized directly in equity. In such case, the income tax expense is recognized in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable profit or loss for the fiscal year.

Deferred taxes are recognized, using the balance sheet liability method, for temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.

Deferred taxes are determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax assets are realized or the deferred tax liabilities are settled.

Deferred tax assets principally arise from tax losses carried forward, impairment of investment securities and loans, and the allowance for loan losses.

Deferred taxes are not recognized for the following temporary differences: (a) the initial recognition of goodwill; (b) the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss; and (c) the temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures, when the parent investor is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences are recognized, only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the tax losses carried forward and the deductible temporary differences can be utilized.

Debt and equity securities in issue

On initial recognition, financial instruments issued by the SMBC Group are classified in accordance with the substance of the contractual agreement as financial liabilities where the contractual arrangement results in the SMBC Group having an obligation to either deliver cash or another financial asset to the holder, or to satisfy the obligation other than by delivering a fixed number of equity shares in exchange for a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset. The instruments or their components are classified as equity where they do not meet the definition of a liability and show evidence of a residual interest in the entity’s assets after deducting all of its liabilities. Compound financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are accounted for separately with the equity component being assigned the residual amount after deducting from the entire value of the compound financial instrument the fair value of the liability component which has been determined separately.

Shareholders’ Equity

Stock issuance costs

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares or options including those issued as a result of a business combination transaction are deducted from the proceeds and shown in equity, net of tax.

Dividends on common stock and preferred stock

Dividends on common stock and preferred stock are recognized in equity in the period in which they are approved by the shareholders. Dividends for the fiscal year that are declared after the reporting period are described in Note 4041 “Dividends Per Share.”

Treasury stock

Where the Company or any other member of the SMBC Group companies purchase the Company’s common or preferred stock, the consideration paid is deducted from equity as treasury stock until they are cancelled or sold. No gain or loss is recognized on the purchase, sale, or cancellation of the Company’s own equity instruments and the consideration paid or received is recognized in equity.

Interest Income and Expense

Interest income and expense for all financial instruments, except for those classified as held for tradingfinancial assets and financial assetsliabilities at fair value through profit or loss, are recognized in “Interest income” and “Interest expense” in the consolidated income statementstatements using the effective interest method.

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period.

The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the netgross carrying amount of thea financial asset or to the amortized cost of a financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the SMBC Group estimates cash flows, considering the contractual terms of the financial instrument but not including future credit losses.ECL. The calculation includes fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate of the financial instrument, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts.

OnceThe effective interest method is used for calculating interest income by applying the effective interest rate to the gross carrying amount of a financial asset or a group of similarasset. However, for credit-impaired financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss,subsequent to initial recognition, interest income is thereafter recognized usingcalculated by applying the effective interest rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss. For financial assets measured at amortized cost of the interest rate is the original effective interest rate.financial assets.

Fee and Commission Income

The Group recognizes fee and commission income in accordance with the five-step model. This model requires the Group to (i) identify the contract with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Fee and commission income includes fee and commission income arisingarises from a diverse range of services that the SMBC Group provides to its customers. Fee and commission income can be divided into two categories: fee and commission income from providing transaction services which is recognized at the point in time when the transaction takes place, and fee and commission income earned from services thatwhich is recognized over the time as the services are provided over a certain period of time.provided. Fee and commission income earned from providing transaction services is recognized whenincludes fees on credit card business, fees and commissions on the service has been completed or the event has occurred. This fee and commission income includessecurities

business, underwriting fees, brokerage fees, investment trusts sales commissions, fees on funds transfer and collection services, service charges from deposit accounts,loan syndication fees and commissions on the securities business, underwriting fees, brokerage fees,for arranging a loan and fee and commission income from other services. Fee and commission income earned from services that are provided over a period of time is recognized over that service period. This fee and commission income includes fiduciary fees, on credit-related businesses, investment fund businesses,management fees, loan commitments fees from which specific lending is unlikely to be drawn down and fee and commission income from other services. Loan commitment fees, together with the related direct cost, for loans that are likely to be drawn down are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the effective interest rate on the loan. Loan commitment fees are recognized over the term of the commitment period when it is unlikely that a loan will be drawn down.

Net Trading Income

Net trading income consists of margins made on market-making and customer business, as well as changes in fair value of trading assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments, caused by movements in interest rates, exchange rates, equity prices and other market variables. It also includes net interest and dividend income on trading assets and liabilities.

Net Income (Loss) from Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

From April 1, 2020, the Group has changed the presentation from “Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” to “Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated income statements in order to reflect gains or losses arising from the financial liabilities designated at FVPL in the consolidated income statements. Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss includes all gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of these financial assets mandatorily measured at FVPL other than trading assets and salesderivative financial instruments, disposal of such assets, and interest and dividend income on these financial assets. It also includes gains and losses arising from changes in the fair values of financial liabilities designated at FVPL except for the effects of changes in their own credit risk, gains or losses arising from the derecognition and interest expense on these financial liabilities.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income includes gains and losses on the disposal ofavailable-for-sale financial assets, debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, and dividendsdividend income fromavailable-for-sale equity instruments.instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.

Earnings Per Share

The SMBC Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) data for its common stock. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to common shareholders of the SMBC Group by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to common shareholders and the weighted average number of common stock outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential common stock including share options and other convertible instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The SMBC Group is currently assessing the impact of the following standards, amendments to standards, and interpretations that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted:

Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture (Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28)

In September 2014, the IASB issued the narrow-scope amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures” to address an acknowledged inconsistency between the requirements in IFRS 10 and those in IAS 28, in dealing with the sale or contribution of assets between an investor and its associate or

joint venture. The effective date of applying the amendments was January 1, 2016 when they were originally issued, however, in December 2015, the IASB issuedEffective Date of Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 to remove the effective date and indicated that a new effective date will be determined at a future date when it has finalized revisions, if any, that result from its research project on the equity accounting. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions (Amendment to IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”16)

In May 2014,2020, the IASB publishedissued an amendment to IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts16 “Leases” to make it easier for lessees to account for COVID-19-related rent concessions such as rent holidays and temporary rent reductions. The amendment exempts lessees to assess whether rent concessions occurring as a direct consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic are lease modifications and allows lessees to account for such rent concessions as if they were not lease modifications. It applies to COVID-19-related rent concessions that reduce lease payments due on or before June 30, 2021. The amendment was effective for annual periods beginning on or after June 1, 2020.

In March 2021, the IASB extended the relief by one year to cover COVID-19-related rent concessions that reduce lease payments due on or before June 30, 2022. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after April 1, 2021 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Interest Rate Benchmark Reform—Phase 2 (Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16)

In August 2020, the IASB issued “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform—Phase 2: Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16” in response to the reform of interest rate benchmarks such as interbank offered rates (“IBORs”). The amendments supplement the amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” and IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” issued in 2019 and focus on the effects on entities’ financial statements when entities replace the previous interest rate benchmark with Customers”an alternative interest rate benchmark as a result of the reform. The amendments support entities in applying the standards when changes are made to establish principles for reportingcontractual cash flows or hedging relationships because of the reform and providing useful information to users of financial statements about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contract with customers. IFRS 15 replaces IAS 18 “Revenue,” IAS 11 “Construction Contracts,” IFRIC 13 “Customer Loyalty Programmes” and other related interpretations. The core principle of IFRS 15 is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration (that is, payment) to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. IFRS 15 also requires enhanced disclosures about revenue, provides guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively and improves guidance for multiple-element arrangements. The SMBC Group expects the primary impacts of the standard to be the capitalization of the incremental costs of obtaining a contract and costs incurred in fulfilling a contract in the credit card business, and the classification if certain incentives related to point programmes are performance obligations. The SMBC Group initially applies the standard on April 1, 2018. The SMBC Group will apply the standard retrospectively by adjusting the consolidated statement of financial position at the date of initial application, without any requirements to restate previous periods. The SMBC Group’s opening shareholders’ equity is expected to increase by approximately ¥15 billionpost-tax, due to the capitalization of contract costs.

IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”

In July 2014, the IASB published IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments,” which is the comprehensive standard to replace IAS 39. The standard contains the following new requirements for classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities, impairment of financial assets and hedge accounting.

Classification and measurement

The standard requires all financial assets to be classified into three categories, namely, amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) and fair value through profit or loss (“FVPL”), based on

the business model within which they are held and their contractual cash flow characteristics. A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold the asset in order to collect contractual cash flows, and the asset’s contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (“SPPI”) on the principal amount outstanding. Financial assets are measured at FVOCI if they are held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, and SPPI requirements are met. Any financial assets that do not meet the criteria of amortized cost or FVOCI should be classified as FVPL, unless an entity makes an irrevocable election fornon-trading equity instruments to be measured at FVOCI. Financial assets that would be otherwise measured at amortized cost or FVOCI can be designated at recognition to be measured at FVPL in order to eliminate or significantly reduce an accounting mismatch.

The standard maintains most of the requirements in IAS 39 regarding the classification and measurement of financial liabilities. However, with the new requirements, if an entity chooses to measure a financial liability at fair value, the amount of change in its fair value that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability will be presented in other comprehensive income, rather than in profit or loss.

The SMBC Group has conducted assessments of business model and SPPI requirements to identify classification and measurement of financial assets under the standard. At initial application, the SMBC Group anticipates, with limited exceptions, that:

Trading assets, derivative financial instruments and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss will be measured at FVPL;

Available-for-sale debt instruments will be measured at FVOCI;

Available-for-sale equity instruments will be measured at FVPL or designated as FVOCI; and

Held-to-maturity investments and loans and advances will be measured at amortized cost.

Impairment

The standard introduces the expected credit loss (“ECL”) model, which is a new model for the recognition of impairment losses, to replace the incurred loss model in IAS 39. The impairment requirements apply to financial assets measured at amortized cost and FVOCI, lease receivables, certain loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts. Under the ECL model, an entity is required to account for expected credit losses from initial recognition of financial instruments and to recognize full lifetime expected losses on a timely basis. The ECL model will result in the recognition of impairment losses earlier than the incurred loss model.

At each reporting date, credit risk on a financial instrument should be assessed and a loss allowance should be measured for expected credit losses resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months, if the credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition (“Stage 1”). A loss allowance should be recognized at an amount equal to expected credit losses resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial instrument for the financial assets which are assessed to have experienced a significant increase in credit risk (“Stage 2”) or for the credit-impaired financial assets (“Stage 3”). A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of that financial asset have occurred. These indicators are similar to those under IAS 39 including significant financial difficulty and default.

Quantitative and qualitative assessments are used to determine whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk on financial instruments. These assessments include comparing the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date and that at the date of initial recognition. Financial instruments with risk of a default increasing more than the quantitative threshold defined by the SMBC Group are deemed to have experienced a significant increase in credit risk. In addition, financial instruments assessed to have high credit risk from the credit risk management practices of the SMBC Group are transferred to Stage 2. Furthermore, a

significant increase in credit risk is presumed if principal and/or interest payments are more than 30 days past due.

The standard requires that expected credit losses should be measured to reflect an unbiased and probability-weighted amount, the time value of money, and reasonable and supportable information that is available at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions. To meet these requirements, the SMBC Group has built ECL models by leveraging the probability of default (“PD”), loss given default (“LGD”) and exposure at default (“EAD”) used in the Basel III regulatory framework, for instance by adjusting certain conservative factors in those PDs and LGDs. For financial assets at Stage 2, the SMBC Group will use the lifetime PDs developed to measure lifetime ECL and consider forward-looking macro-economic information. On the other hand, the discounted cash flow method will be continued to be applied for the measurement of the ECL for individually significant impaired financial assets. The allowance for financial assets in IFRS 9 will increase compared to that in IAS 39, as a result of an increase in the overall level of allowance fornon-impaired financial assets. This is primarily due to the requirements under IFRS 9 to measure an allowance equal to 12 months ECL for those financial assets at Stage 1 and lifetime ECL for those at Stage 2, whereas the allowance for those financial assets is calculated for incurred losses with a relatively short loss identification period not longer than 12 months under IAS 39.

Hedge Accounting

The standard introduces a new hedge accounting model, together with corresponding disclosures about risk management activity for those applying hedge accounting. The standard aligns hedge accounting more closely with risk management and adopts a more principle-based approach than that under IAS 39. The standard includes an accounting policy choice to defer the adoption of hedge accounting under the standard and to continue with IAS 39.

Transition impact

The SMBC Group initially applies the standard on April 1, 2018. The SMBC Group will apply the classification and measurement and impairment requirements retrospectively by adjusting the consolidated statement of financial position at the date of initial application, without any requirements to restate previous periods. As for hedge accounting, the SMBC Group started to apply hedge accounting to a part of the hedge transactions whose hedged items were net investments in foreign operations under IAS 39, and has decided to apply the accounting policy to continue with IAS 39 hedge accounting for those hedge transactions. As the amended IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” will be effective at the time of application of the standard, the SMBC Group will revise the related disclosures for hedge accounting from then.

The SMBC Group’s opening shareholders’ equity is expected to decrease by approximately ¥150 billionpost-tax, primarily due to the new requirements for impairment. This estimate is based on accounting policies, assumptions, judgments and estimation techniques that remain subject to change until the SMBC Group finalizes its financial statements for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. The adoption of IFRS 9 has no impact on the SMBC Group’s Common Equity Tier 1 capital, as it is calculated under Japanese GAAP.

Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment Transactions (Amendments to IFRS 2)

In June 2016, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IFRS 2 “Share-based Payment” to clarify how to account for certain types of share-based payment transactions.statements. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 20182021 and are not expected to have a material impact on the SMBC Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance ContractsReference to the Conceptual Framework (Amendments to IFRS 4)3)

In September 2016,May 2020, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts”3 “Business Combinations” to address concerns arising from implementingupdate a reference in IFRS 3 to the new financial instruments standard, IFRS 9, before implementing“Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting” without changing the replacement

standard that the IASB is developingaccounting requirements for IFRS 4. These concerns include temporary volatility in reported results. The amendments introduce two approaches. One is an approach for entities that issue insurance contracts. This is applicable only when an entity first applies IFRS 9. The other is an approach for entities whose activities are predominantly connected with insurance. This is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a material impact on the SMBC Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2014-2016 Cycle

In December 2016, the IASB issued Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2014-2016 Cycle, which is a collection of amendments to three IFRSs. These are minor amendments that clarify, correct or remove redundant wordings in the standards. These improvements include the amendments effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and are not expected to have a material impact on the SMBC Group’s consolidated financial statements.

IFRIC Interpretation 22 “Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration”

In December 2016, the IASB issued IFRIC Interpretation 22 “Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration” to clarify the date of the transaction for the purpose of determining the exchange rate to use in transactions that involve advance consideration paid or received in a foreign currency in accordance with IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.” The interpretation is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a material impact on the SMBC Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Transfers of Investment Property (Amendments to IAS 40)

In December 2016, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 40 “Investment Property” to clarify the requirements on transfers to, or from, investment property when, and only when, there is a change in use.business combinations. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and are not expected to have a material impact on the SMBC Group’s consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 16 “Leases”

In January 2016, the IASB published IFRS 16 “Leases,” which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, replacing IAS 17 “Leases.”l, 2022. The standard introduces a single lessee accounting model and eliminates the classification of leases as either operating leases or finance leases, requiring a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities. A lessor continues to classify its leases as operating leases or finance leases, and to account for them differently. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRIC 23 “Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments”

In June 2017, the IASB published IFRIC 23 “Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments,” which clarifies how to apply the recognition and measurement requirements in IAS 12 “Income Taxes” when there is uncertainty over income tax treatments. IAS 12 specifies how to account for current and deferred tax, but not how to reflect the effects of uncertainty. This interpretation adds to the requirements in IAS 12 by specifying how to reflect the effects of uncertainty in accounting for income taxes. The interpretation is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the interpretation will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation (Amendments to IFRS 9)

In October 2017, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 9 to allow entities to measure particular prepayable financial assets with negative compensation at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive

income instead of at fair value through profit or loss, if a specified condition is met. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Long-term Interests in AssociatesProperty, Plant and Joint VenturesEquipment: Proceeds before Intended Use (Amendments to IAS 28)16)

In October 2017,May 2020, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 28 to clarify that entities account16 “Property, Plant and Equipment.” The amendments prohibit an entity from deducting from the cost of property, plant and equipment amounts received from selling items produced while the entity is preparing the asset for long-term interestsits intended use. Instead, an entity will recognize such sales proceeds and related cost in an associateprofit or joint venture, to which the equity method is not applied, using IFRS 9.loss. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019.l, 2022. The SMBCGroup is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Onerous Contracts: Cost of Fulfilling a Contract (Amendments to IAS 37)

In May 2020, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets” to specify which costs an entity includes when assessing whether a contract will be loss-making. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January l, 2022. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2015-2017 Cycle2018–2020

In December 2017,May 2020, the IASB issued Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2015-2017 Cycle,2018-2020, which is a collection of amendments to four IFRSs.IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards,” IFRS 9, IAS 41 “Agriculture” and the “Illustrative Examples” accompanying IFRS 16. These are minor amendments that either clarify, the wordingsimplify or remove redundant wordings in the standard or correct relatively minor oversights or conflicts between existing requirements of the standards. These improvements include the amendments effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement (Amendments to IAS 19)

In February 2018, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 “Employee Benefits” to clarify how to determine current service cost and net interest for the period after a change to a defined benefit plan. When a change to a plan such as an amendment, curtailment or settlement takes place, IAS 19 requires an entity to remeasure its net defined benefit liability or asset. The amendments require an entity to use the updated assumptions from this remeasurement to determine current service cost and net interest for the remainder of the reporting period after the change to the plan. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019.l, 2022. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 17 “Insurance Contracts”

In May 2017, the IASB published IFRS 17 “Insurance Contracts,” which establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of insurance contracts, replacing IFRS 4.4 “Insurance Contracts.” IFRS 4 provided entities dispensation to carry on accounting for insurance contracts using national accounting standards, resulting in a multitude of different approaches. IFRS 17 requires all insurance contracts to be accounted for in a consistent manner. Insurance obligations will be accounted for by using present values instead of historical cost.

In June 2020, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 17 to help entities implement the standard and make it easier for them to explain their financial performance. The fundamental principles introduced when the IASB first issued IFRS 17 in May 2017 remain unaffected. The mandatory effective date of applying IFRS 17 was January 1, 2021 when it was originally issued but deferred to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (Amendments to IAS 1)

In January 2020, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” to clarify how to classify debt and other liabilities as current or non-current. The amendments make it easier for entities to determine whether, in the statement of financial position, debt and other liabilities with an uncertain settlement date should be classified as current or non-current. The effective date of applying the amendments was January l, 2022 when they were originally issued, however, in July 2020, the IASB issued an amendment which defers the effective date to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2)

In February 2021, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 “Making Materiality Judgements” to support entities improve accounting policy disclosures for users of financial statements. The amendments to IAS 1 require entities to disclose their material accounting policy information rather than their significant accounting policies. The amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 provide guidance on how to apply the concept of materiality to accounting policy disclosures. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January l, 2023.

Definition of Accounting Estimates (Amendments to IAS 8)

In February 2021, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.” The amendments introduce the definition of accounting estimates and clarify how entities should distinguish changes in accounting policies from changes in accounting estimates. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January l, 2023.

Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction (Amendments to IAS 12)

In May 2021, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IAS 12 “Income Taxes” to specify how entities should account for deferred tax on transactions such as leases and decommissioning obligations. The aim of the amendments is to reduce diversity in the reporting of deferred tax on such transactions. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2021.2023. The SMBC Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

3

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

The consolidated financial statements are influenced by estimates and management judgment,judgments, which necessarily have to be made in the course of preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and which are continually evaluated.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the losses incurred in the loan portfolios at the end of each reporting period. Management exercises judgment in making assumptions and estimations when calculating the allowance for loan losses on both individually and collectively assessed loans.

The allowance for loan losses is measured under the ECL model which requires the use of complex models and significant assumptions about future economic conditions and credit behavior. A number of significant judgments are also required in applying the accounting requirements for individuallymeasuring ECL, such as:

qualitative assessment in determining obligor grades;

determining criteria for a significant impaired loans is estimatedincrease in credit risk since initial recognition;

measuring ECL by management based onchoosing appropriate models and assumptions;

incorporating forward-looking information into the ECL measurement by obligor grading, forecast range of macroeconomic scenarios, and additional ECL adjustments if the current circumstances, events or conditions at relevant portfolio level are not fully reflected in the ECL model; and

estimating the expected future cash flows by taking into account factors such as historical loss information, the appropriateness of the borrower’s business plan or operational improvement plan, the status of progress of its plan, the overall support from financial institutions, and the realizable value of any collateral held.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the obligor grading, macroeconomic factors and additional ECL adjustments used to determine the final ECL reflected the current and forward-looking impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The obligor grades were reviewed based on the most recent information available as appropriate. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the obligor grades of many corporate borrowers severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic were downgraded to the extent that the credit risk on loans and advances to such borrowers was determined to be significantly increased since initial recognition and their allowance for loan losses was measured at an amount equal to the lifetime ECL.

The macroeconomic scenarios for incorporating forward-looking information in the remaining loansECL measurement were updated, reflecting the recent economic forecasts. Although the Group understands that there is collectively estimatedsignificant

uncertainty in predicting the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Japanese and global economy, we assumed that the Japanese and global economy will recover from the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022, reflecting the roll-out of vaccines, and reach pre-COVID-19 level by grouping financial assets intothe end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023. This assumption was considered in determining the base scenario. The extent to which the premises of the base scenario and past macroeconomic experiences are reflected in determining the upside and downside scenarios was revised to better capture relevant information under the unprecedented conditions experienced during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The following table shows the growth rates of the Japanese and global GDP, which are the key factors of the macroeconomic scenarios, under the base scenario.

   For the fiscal year ending
March 31,
 
   2022   2023 
   (%) 

Japanese GDP

   3.3    2.0 

Global GDP

   5.6    3.9 

In determining the need for making additional ECL adjustments, the Group considered whether there is an increased credit risk for some portfolios on which the basis of similar credit risk characteristics and usingCOVID-19 pandemic would have a material adverse impact but where the historical loss experience for these portfolios adjusted forimpact was not fully incorporated in the effectECL model. This included the consideration of the currenttemporary impact on probability of default of various measures taken by governments. The Group evaluated the forward-looking impact on credit risks and losses of certain industry-related portfolios selected based on changes in factors such as the market conditions and bankruptcy trends as a result of the reduction in economic environment. To assessactivity by requests for voluntary restraint on movement and business closure requests to commercial facilities. As a consequence, the losses on the loanGroup decided to make additional ECL adjustments for portfolios where loss events have occurred but not yet been identified, management develops assumptions and methodologiesrelated to estimate the loss identification period.some industries.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time as the economic environment changes or new information becomes available. Changes in these estimates and judgments will result in a different allowance for loan losses and may have a direct impact on impairment charges. Impairment charges on loans and advances amountingAllowance for loan losses amounted to ¥126,623 million, ¥141,457¥849,287 million and ¥118,750¥706,405 million were recognized for the fiscal years endedat March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 10 “Loans and Advances” and Note 32 “Impairment Charges on Financial Assets.Advances.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of financial instruments where no active market exists or where quoted prices are not otherwise available are determined by using valuation techniques. In these cases, inputs to valuation techniques are based on observable data with respect to similar financial instruments or by using models. Where observable inputs are not available, the fair value is estimated based on appropriate assumptions that a market participant would take into account. Where valuation techniques (for example, models) are used to determine fair values, they are validated and periodically reviewed. The SMBC Group certifies significant valuation models before they are used, and calibrates them to ensure that outputs reflect actual data and comparative market prices. To the extent practical, models use only observable data; however, inputs such as credit risk (both own and counterparty), volatilities and correlations require management to make estimates. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect the fair values of these financial instruments. More details about the SMBC Group’s valuation techniques, significant unobservable inputs used in determining fair values and sensitivity analyses are given in Note 4344 “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities.”

Impairment ofAvailable-for-sale Financial Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are impaired if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of loss events. The SMBC Group exercises judgment in determining whether there is objective evidence of occurrence of loss events, which result in a decrease in estimated future cash flows of the financial assets. The estimation of future cash flows also requires judgment. In the assessment of impairment ofavailable-for-sale equity instruments, the SMBC Group also considers whether there has been a significant or prolonged decline in fair value below their cost. The determination of what is a significant or prolonged decline requires management judgment.

Impairment may occur when there is objective evidence of deterioration in the financial conditions of the investee, industry and sector performance, or changes in operating and financing cash flows. The determination of impairment in this respect also includes significant management judgment.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time based upon future events that may or may not occur and changes in these estimates and judgments could adversely affect the carrying amounts ofavailable-for-sale financial assets. Impairment charges onavailable-for-sale financial assets totaled ¥10,185 million, ¥71,510 million and ¥29,606 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 9 “Investment Securities” and Note 32 “Impairment Charges on Financial Assets.”

Impairment of GoodwillIntangible Assets

Impairment of goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, then its recoverable amount is estimated. The process to determine the recoverable amount is inherently uncertain because such recoverable

amount is determined based on a number of management estimates and judgments. The SMBC Group determines the recoverable amount using the estimated future cash flows,pre-tax discount rates, growth rates, and other factors. The estimation of future cash flows inherently reflects management judgments, even though such forecasts are prepared taking into account actual performance and external economic data. Thepre-tax discount rates and growth rates may be significantly affected by market interest rates or other market conditions, which are beyond management’s control, and therefore significant management judgments are made to determine these assumptions. These management judgments are made based on the facts and circumstances at the time of the impairment test, and may vary depending on the situation and the time. Changes in management judgments may result in different impairment test results and different impairment amounts recognized. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, impairment losses on goodwill were ¥28,607¥42,398 million, ¥74,616nil and ¥62,624 million, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 14 “Intangible Assets.”

Impairment of other intangible assets

The Group has other intangible assets, not including goodwill, which consist of software, contractual customer relationships, trademarks and others. These are divided into other amortizing intangible assets and other non-amortizing intangible assets. Other amortizing intangible assets are tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable at the end of each reporting period. Other non-amortizing intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, then its recoverable amount is estimated. The process to determine the recoverable amount is inherently uncertain because such recoverable amount is determined based on a number of management estimates and judgments as described in “—Impairment of goodwill.” Changes in management judgments may result in different impairment test results and different impairment amounts recognized. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, impairment losses on other intangible assets were ¥448 million, ¥28,689 million and ¥1,124¥4,041 million, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 14 “Intangible Assets.”

Provision for Interest Repayment

Provision for interest repayment represents management’s estimate of future claims for the refund ofso-called “gray zone interest” (interest on loans in excess of the maximum rate prescribed by the Interest Rate Restriction Act (ranging from 15% to 20%) up to the 29.2% maximum rate permitted under the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates), taking into account historical experience such as the number of customer claims for a refund, the amount of repayments and the characteristics of customers, and the length of the period during which claims are expected to be received in the future.

Management estimates and judgments may change from time to time as the legal environment and market conditions change or new information becomes available. Changes in these estimates and judgments could affect the balance of provision for interest repayment. Provision for interest repayment is recorded in provisions as a liability, and it totaled ¥145,179¥141,201 million and ¥157,333¥143,429 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 2021 “Provisions.”

Retirement Benefits

The SMBC Group has defined benefit plans such as defined benefit pension plans andlump-sum severance indemnity plans. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is calculated based on actuarial valuations that are dependent upon a number of assumptions, including discount rates, mortality rates and future salary (benefit) increases. The discount rates are equivalent to market yields of AA credit-rated corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating those of the related obligations. Future mortality rates are based on the official mortality table generally used for actuarial assumptions in Japan. Other assumptions used for the calculation of the defined benefit obligation are based on historical records. Due to the long-term nature of these plans, such estimates are subject to significant uncertainty. Any change in these assumptions will impact

actuarial gains and losses, as well as the present value of the defined benefit obligations and the net retirement benefit expense for each period. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions in the year, and return on plan assets excluding interest income are recognized in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit or loss.

The difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period is recognized as assets and liabilities in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. When this calculation for each plan results in a benefit to the SMBC Group, the recognized asset is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan. An economic benefit is available to the SMBC Group, if it is

realizable during the life of the plan or on settlement of the plan obligation. The net total of assets and liabilities in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position amounted to net assets of ¥279,567¥480,053 million and ¥192,772¥129,976 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 2324 “Retirement Benefits.”

Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences are recognized, only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the tax losses carried forward and the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. This assessment requires significant management estimates and judgments. Future taxable profit is estimated based on, among other relevant factors, forecasted results of operations, which are based on historical financial performance and the business plans that management believes to be prudent and feasible. While the SMBC Group carefully assesses the realization of tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences, the actual taxable profit in the future may be less than the forecast. The deferred tax assets amounted to ¥19,436¥28,958 million and ¥81,961¥102,198 million in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, while the net total of deferred tax assets and liabilities amounted to net liabilities of ¥378,305 million and ¥238,240¥370,577 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,net assets of ¥36,015 million at March 31, 2020, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 2223 “Deferred Income Tax.”

 

44

SEGMENT ANALYSIS

Business Segments

The SMBC Group’s business segment information is prepared based on the internal reporting system utilized by management to assess the performance of its business segments.

The SMBC Group has four main business segments: the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit, the Global Business Unit, which was renamed from the International Business Unit on April 1, 2020, and the Global Markets Business Unit, with the remaining operations recorded in Head office account and others. TheEffective from April 1, 2020, an internal reorganization of certain SMBC Group changed its business segment information forbusinesses was made and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 in connection with the introduction of Group-wide business units, which determine strategies for each customer segment across therevenue management system at SMBC Group companies. The business segmentNikko Securities Inc. (“SMBC Nikko Securities”) was previously reported as Commercial Banking, Leasing, Securities and Consumer Finance, with the remaining operations recorded in Others. Comparative information has been restated.changed.

Wholesale Business Unit

The Wholesale Business Unit provides financing, investment management, risk hedging, and settlement services as well as financialcomprehensive solutions primarily for corporate clients in Japan that respond to wide-ranging client needs in relation to financing, investment management, risk hedging, settlement, M&A and other advisory services, digital services and leasing, primarily forlarge-andmid-sized corporate clients in Japan.leasing. This business unit mainly consists of the wholesale businesses of SMBC, SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. (“SMBC Nikko Securities”), SMBC Trust Bank Ltd. (“SMBC Trust Bank”) and, Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited (“SMFL”)., SMBC Nikko Securities, Sumitomo Mitsui Card Company, Limited (“Sumitomo Mitsui Card”) and SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Finance Service”), which changed its corporate name from Cedyna Financial Corporation upon merger with former SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd. on July 1, 2020.

Retail Business Unit

The Retail Business Unit provides financial services to both consumers residing in Japan and domesticsmall-sized companies, and mainly consists of the retail business of SMBC, SMBC Nikko SecuritiesTrust Bank and SMBC Trust BankNikko Securities, together with three consumer finance companies, Sumitomo Mitsui Card, Company, Limited, Cedyna Financial CorporationSMBC Finance Service and SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd. This business unit offers a wide range of products and services for consumers, including wealth management services, settlement services, consumer finance and housing loans, in order to address the financial needs of all individual customers. Forsmall-sized companies, this business unit provides a wide array of financial products and services to comprehensively address business owners’ needs as both corporate managers and individuals such as business and asset succession.

InternationalGlobal Business Unit

The InternationalGlobal Business Unit supports the global businesses of a diverse range of clients, such as Japanese companies operating overseas,non-Japanese companies, financial institutions and government agencies and public corporations of various countries. This business unit provides a variety of tailored products and services to meet customer and market requirements, including loans, deposits, clearing services, trade finance, project finance, loan syndication, derivatives, and global cash management services, leasing services, underwriting activities, Japanese stockbroking and M&A advisory services. This business unit mainly consists of the internationalglobal businesses of SMBC, SMBC Nikko Securities, SMBC Trust Bank, SMFL, SMBC Nikko Securities and their foreign subsidiaries.

Global Markets Business Unit

The Global Markets Business Unit offers solutions through foreign exchange products, derivatives, bonds, stocks, and other marketable financial products and also undertakes asset liability management operations, which help comprehensively control balance sheet liquidity risks and interest rate risks. This business unit consists of the Treasury Unit of SMBC and the Product Unitglobal markets businesses of SMBC Nikko Securities.

Head office account and others

The Head office account and others represent the difference between the aggregate of the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit, the InternationalGlobal Business Unit and the Global Markets Business Unit, and the SMBC Group as a whole. It mainly consists of administrative expenses related to headquarters operations and profit or loss from other subsidiaries and equity-method associates, including The Japan Research Institute, Limited and Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited. It also includes internal transactions between the SMBC Group companies, which are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss

The business segment information is prepared under the management approach. Consolidated net business profit is used as a profit indicator of banks in Japan. Consolidated net business profit of each segment is calculated by deducting general and administrative expenses (i.e., the total of personnel expense,non-personnel expense and tax), and by adding or deducting others (i.e., share of profit or loss of equity-method associates and joint ventures and cooperated profit and loss based on internal managerial accounting) to or from consolidated gross profits (i.e., the total of net interest income, trust fees, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income). The consolidated gross profits and general and administrative expenses of each segment are prepared for management accounting purposes and not generated solely by aggregating figures prepared under financial accounting. While the SMBC Group’s disclosure complies with the requirements on segment information in accordance with IFRS, the figures reported to management and disclosed herein are prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in Japan (“Japanese GAAP”). Consequently, the business segment information does not agree with the figures in the consolidated financial statements under IFRS. These differences are addressed in the “Reconciliation of Segmental Results of Operations to Consolidated Income Statement.Statements.

Information regarding the total assets of each segment is not used by management in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Accordingly, total assets are not included in the business segment information.

Segmental Results of Operations

The following tables show our results of operations by business segment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019. The comparative information for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 has been restated to reflect the aforementioned internal reorganization and change in the revenue management system, and eliminate the impact of factors such as changes in interest rates and exchange rates that may distort the comparison.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

 

   Wholesale
Business
Unit
  Retail
Business
Unit
  International
Business
Unit
  Global Markets
Business
Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
   (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

  ¥772.9  ¥1,311.7  ¥632.0  ¥356.2  ¥(91.7 ¥2,981.1 

General and administrative expenses

   (347.9  (1,027.7  (280.7  (53.9  (106.0  (1,816.2

Others(2)

   53.7   15.6   46.9   17.5   (94.8  38.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥478.7  ¥299.6  ¥398.2  ¥319.8  ¥(292.5 ¥1,203.8 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

   Wholesale
Business
Unit
  Retail
Business
Unit
  International
Business
Unit
  Global Markets
Business
Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
   (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

  ¥776.4  ¥1,313.9  ¥566.1  ¥346.8  ¥(82.5 ¥2,920.7 

General and administrative expenses

   (344.8  (1,041.1  (241.2  (50.2  (135.1  (1,812.4

Others(2)

   45.6   12.1   38.5   8.2   (79.8  24.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥477.2  ¥284.9  ¥363.4  ¥304.8  ¥(297.4 ¥1,132.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:

  Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 International
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total   Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 Global
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

  ¥749.2  ¥1,272.7  ¥588.8  ¥354.1  ¥(60.8 ¥2,904.0   ¥634.9  ¥1,127.4  ¥723.7  ¥460.7  ¥(140.5 ¥2,806.2 

General and administrative expenses

   (325.3 (1,000.6 (236.5 (49.2 (113.2 (1,724.8   (299.9 (910.4 (383.3 (82.9 (70.6 (1,747.1

Others(2)

   48.0  10.0  (23.9 8.8  (79.2 (36.3   53.5  2.2  26.3  35.7  (92.8 24.9 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥471.9  ¥282.1  ¥328.4  ¥313.7  ¥(253.2 ¥1,142.9   ¥388.5  ¥219.2  ¥366.7  ¥413.5  ¥(303.9 ¥1,084.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

 

 
  Wholesale
Business
Unit
 Retail
Business
Unit
 Global
Business
Unit
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others
 Total 
  (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

  ¥620.1  ¥1,176.1  ¥680.8  ¥438.6  ¥(147.0 ¥2,768.6 

General and administrative expenses

   (303.6 (934.5 (370.9 (79.6 (51.0 (1,739.6

Others(2)

   50.5  2.0  52.9  32.5  (81.9 56.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥367.0  ¥243.6  ¥362.8  ¥391.5  ¥(279.9 ¥1,085.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

 

 
  Wholesale
Business
Unit(3)
 Retail
Business
Unit
 Global
Business
Unit(3)
 Global Markets
Business
Unit
 Head office
account and
others(3)
 Total 
  (In billions) 

Consolidated gross profit(1)

  ¥626.8  ¥1,185.7  ¥654.6  ¥378.0  ¥1.1  ¥2,846.2 

General and administrative expenses

   (305.8 (930.0 (351.2 (77.0 (51.1 (1,715.1

Others(2)

   46.9  1.8  56.1  30.6  (74.2 61.2 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥367.9  ¥257.5  ¥359.5  ¥331.6  ¥(124.2 ¥1,192.3 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Consolidated gross profit = (Interest income – Interest expenses) + Trust fees + (Fee and commission income – Fee and commission expenses) + (Trading income – Trading losses) + (Other operating income – Other operating expenses).

(2)

“Others” includes share of profit or loss of equity-method associates and joint ventures and cooperated profit and loss, that is, profit and loss double-accounted fordouble counted within the Group’s business segments in the managerial accounting.

(3)

SMFL became a joint venture from a consolidated subsidiary of the Group on November 28, 2018. However, for managerial accounting purposes, the full year results of SMFL were included in those of the Wholesale Business Unit and the Global Business Unit, while its results after it became a joint venture of the Group were deducted from those of Head office account and others. For consistency with financial results, the Group’s share of the profit of SMFL as our joint venture recognized in the consolidated income statement was included in others in the Head office account and others.

Reconciliation of Segmental Results of Operations to Consolidated Income StatementStatements

The figures provided in the tables above are calculated by aggregating the figures used for management reporting under Japanese GAAP for each segment. The total amount of consolidated net business profit that is calculated by each segment based on the internal managerial data is reconciled to profit before tax reported in the consolidated financial statements under IFRS as shown in the following table:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In billions)   (In billions) 

Consolidated net business profit

  ¥1,203.8  ¥1,132.9  ¥1,142.9   ¥1,084.0  ¥1,085.0  ¥1,192.3 

Differences between management reporting and Japanese GAAP:

        

Total credit costs

   (94.2 (164.4 (102.8   (360.5 (170.6 (110.3

Gains on equity instruments

   118.9  55.0  69.0    92.6  80.5  116.3 

Extraordinary gains or losses and others

   (119.6 (44.2 (128.9   (143.9 (106.3 (74.7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax under Japanese GAAP

   1,108.9  979.3  980.2    672.2  888.6  1,123.6 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Differences between IFRS and Japanese GAAP:

    

Differences between Japanese GAAP and IFRS:

    

Scope of consolidation

   (1.6 (12.0 (3.1   5.7  (3.3 0.1 

Derivative financial instruments

   (20.7 (110.9 173.1    94.8  (163.3 31.3 

Investment securities

   68.8  (8.8 56.6    113.3  (115.3 (129.5

Loans and advances

   (33.5 (0.7 (35.2   60.9  (116.0 (23.2

Investments in associates and joint ventures

   (1.6 (15.9 53.4    3.4  (190.8 (86.5

Property, plant and equipment

   1.0  1.3  1.3    (2.5 (30.5 (1.2

Lease accounting

   (0.5 (3.7 (1.5   1.0  0.4  (1.4

Defined benefit plans

   (13.2 22.9  6.6    —    (32.6 (51.4

Foreign currency translation

   12.7  3.6  61.7    (20.2 11.9  1.3 

Classification of equity and liability

   14.1  8.4  5.4    12.5  12.7  11.9 

Others

   (15.4 16.9  27.2    15.4  21.0  (43.1
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax under IFRS

  ¥1,119.0  ¥880.4  ¥1,325.7   ¥956.5  ¥282.8  ¥831.9 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

On April 1, 2019, the Group adopted IFRS 16 retrospectively by adjusting the consolidated statement of financial position at the date of initial application, and has not restated comparatives as permitted by IFRS 16. Therefore, the accounting standards under IFRS for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 are different from those for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, when calculating the differences in profit before tax between Japanese GAAP and IFRS.

Information about Geographical Areas

The following table shows the total operating income in accordance with IFRS by the main geographical areas. The SMBC Group’s services are provided to domestic and foreign clients on a worldwide basis. These include transactions where SMBC’s branches in Japan may deal with customers located in foreign countries and where SMBC’s overseas branches may provide services to Japanese companies.

To identify income attributed to each geographical area for the purposes of this disclosure, they are aggregated based on the geographical location of the booking entity, with the assumption that transactions booked in booking entities are deemed to have occurred in their respective geographical areas.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021   2020   2019(4) 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic(1):

            

Japan

   ¥2,670,858   ¥2,356,627   ¥2,840,058   ¥2,077,833   ¥1,791,910   ¥2,079,758 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   2,670,858    2,356,627    2,840,058    2,077,833    1,791,910    2,079,758 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign(1)(2):

            

Americas

   350,118    313,742    196,399    448,998    277,017    315,419 

Europe and Middle East

   484,807    401,320    352,232    246,218    194,441    371,413 

Asia and Oceania

   306,564    276,206    299,537    392,536    440,482    400,301 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign

   1,141,489    991,268    848,168    1,087,752    911,940    1,087,133 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total operating income(3)

   ¥3,812,347   ¥3,347,895   ¥3,688,226   ¥3,165,585   ¥2,703,850   ¥3,166,891 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

The geographical segmentation is determined based on the degrees of the following factors: geographic proximity, similarity of economic activities and relationship of business activities among regions.

(2)

Americas includes the United States, Brazil, Canada and others; Europe and Middle East include the United Kingdom, Germany, France and others; Asia and Oceania include China, Singapore, Australia and others except Japan.

(3)

Total operating income comprises net interest income, net fee and commission income, net trading income, net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, net investment income and other income.

(4)

From the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, premiums for deposit insurance have been reclassified from “General and administrative expense” to “Interest expense.” Comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

 

5

CASH AND DEPOSITS WITH BANKS

Cash and deposits with banks at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017       2021       2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Cash

  ¥703,138   ¥1,123,128   ¥779,343   ¥844,886 

Deposits with banks

   53,992,931    46,207,027    72,311,473    61,626,567 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total cash and deposits with banks

  ¥54,696,069   ¥47,330,155   ¥73,090,816   ¥62,471,453 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents used for the purposes of the consolidated statementstatements of cash flows at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 is shown as follows:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016       2021     2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Cash and deposits with banks

   ¥54,696,069  ¥47,330,155  ¥43,144,654   ¥73,090,816  ¥62,471,453  ¥57,763,441 

Less: term deposits with original maturities over three months

   (627,837 (606,795 (597,960   (675,185 (532,703 (532,784

Less: cash segregated as deposits and others

   (667,099 (478,541 (419,728   (866,934 (735,209 (514,128

Add: cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale

   15,323   —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   ¥53,416,456  ¥46,244,819  ¥42,126,966   ¥71,548,697  ¥61,203,541  ¥56,716,529 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Private depository institutions in Japan are required to maintain certain minimum reserve funds with the Bank of Japan, based on average deposit balances and certain other factors. There are similar reserve deposit requirements for the SMBC Group’s foreign offices engaged in banking businesses in foreign countries. At March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, the reserve funds required to be maintained by the SMBC Group, which were included in cash and cash equivalents, amounted to ¥1,689,340¥1,875,857 million, ¥1,644,684¥1,705,352 million and ¥1,436,232¥1,784,466 million, respectively.

 

6

TRADING ASSETS

Trading assets at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Debt instruments

  ¥2,841,148   ¥3,339,928   ¥2,732,480   ¥2,545,703 

Equity instruments

   327,975    436,743    408,256    239,313 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total trading assets

  ¥3,169,123   ¥3,776,671   ¥3,140,736   ¥2,785,016 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Trading debt instruments mainly consist of Japanese government bonds. Trading equity instruments mainly consist of publicly traded Japanese stocks.

 

7

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

Derivative financial instruments include futures, forwards, swaps, options and other types of derivative contracts, which are transactions listed on exchanges orover-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions. In the normal course of business, the SMBC Group enters into a variety of derivatives for trading and risk management purposes. The SMBC Group uses derivatives for trading activities, which include facilitating customer transactions, market-making and arbitrage activities. The SMBC Group also uses derivatives to reduce its exposures to market and credit risks as part of its asset and liability management.

Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of underlying items such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities, bonds, commodities, credit spreads and other indices. The SMBC Group’s derivative financial instruments mainly consist of interest rate derivatives and currency derivatives. Interest rate derivatives include interest rate swaps, interest rate futuresoptions and interest rate swaptions.futures. Currency derivatives include foreign exchange forward transactions, currency swaps and currency options.

The tables below represent the derivative financial instruments by type and purpose of derivatives at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
  Trading   Risk Management(1)   Trading   Risk Management(1) 
  Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest rate derivatives

  ¥676,464,541   ¥1,771,745   ¥1,639,850   ¥69,550,646   ¥300,376   ¥333,182   ¥897,101,881   ¥2,701,146   ¥2,395,741   ¥56,201,172   ¥396,135   ¥254,218 

Futures

   78,295,049    28,689    28,871    18,269,263    5,534    1,167    28,832,868    14,800    14,662    11,629,291    1,494    588 

Listed Options

   66,989,307    4,538    722    —      —      —      186,425,271    30,995    6,915    —      —      —   

Forwards

   25,030,851    274    994    —      —      —      110,252,456    256    3    —      —      —   

Swaps

   429,498,805    1,651,945    1,500,361    51,131,039    294,842    329,446    466,717,825    2,485,621    2,189,767    44,417,994    383,371    253,630 

OTC Options

   76,650,529    86,299    108,902    150,344    —      2,569    104,873,461    169,474    184,394    153,887    11,270    —   

Currency derivatives

   120,282,459    1,439,993    1,293,900    7,986,176    283,248    112,322    157,543,495    2,129,604    1,935,117    13,119,180    196,261    239,943 

Futures

   689    —      19    —      —      —      8,068    104    10    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Forwards

   74,380,475    759,993    708,645    1,866,249    49,440    24,929    75,327,505    1,081,492    863,744    2,003,070    5,605    91,422 

Swaps

   39,668,889    577,350    490,014    6,119,927    233,808    87,393    76,385,589    955,783    973,057    11,116,110    190,656    148,521 

OTC Options

   6,232,406    102,650    95,222    —      —      —      5,822,333    92,225    98,306    —      —      —   

Equity derivatives

   3,354,789    71,344    105,194    2,219    —      155    2,825,220    65,887    87,783    54,752    715    2,715 

Futures

   829,262    5,946    9,747    —      —      —      1,613,308    14,269    9,969    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   1,779,546    42,209    68,341    —      —      —      950,758    34,014    69,039    —      —      —   

Forwards

   7,564    745    208    —      —      —      3,574    155    63    —      —      —   

Swaps

   77,015    186    8,171    2,219    —      155    91,648    1,593    3,124    54,752    715    2,715 

OTC Options

   661,402    22,258    18,727    —      —      —      165,932    15,856    5,588    —      —      —   

Commodity derivatives

   161,539    6,516    4,948    —      —      —      109,665    7,310    5,371    —      —      —   

Futures

   20,902    402    464    —      —      —      30,917    1,043    510    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Forwards

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Swaps

   128,467    6,052    3,974    —      —      —      76,264    6,201    4,346    —      —      —   

OTC Options

   12,170    62    510    —      —      —      2,484    66    515    —      —      —   

Credit derivatives

   1,320,297    12,049    8,465    —      —      —      2,895,632    24,559    28,545    —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

  ¥801,583,625   ¥3,301,647   ¥3,052,357   ¥77,539,041   ¥583,624   ¥445,659   ¥1,060,475,893   ¥4,928,506   ¥4,452,557   ¥69,375,104   ¥593,111   ¥496,876 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

  At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2020 
  Trading   Risk Management(1)   Trading   Risk Management(1) 
  Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest rate derivatives

  ¥591,977,855   ¥1,864,348   ¥1,738,961   ¥60,318,601   ¥450,889   ¥466,643   ¥893,588,637   ¥3,446,719   ¥2,982,015   ¥53,625,724   ¥664,807   ¥500,374 

Futures

   78,549,213    20,278    16,579    5,853,880    221    865    38,049,894    51,843    50,545    1,577,745    438    124 

Listed Options

   35,011,822    6,622    459    —      —      —      165,280,570    48,277    11,465    —      —      —   

Forwards

   22,776,789    152    1,986    —      —      —      124,681,480    616    —      —      —      —   

Swaps

   393,798,232    1,723,403    1,584,833    54,335,702    450,665    464,152    465,412,015    3,123,501    2,729,662    51,896,189    638,744    500,250 

OTC Options

   61,841,799    113,893    135,104    129,019    3    1,626    100,164,678    222,482    190,343    151,790    25,625    —   

Currency derivatives

   117,119,766    1,444,103    1,321,157    6,360,374    222,224    266,887    141,416,221    1,858,803    1,783,476    12,204,471    184,981    110,985 

Futures

   2,261    —      19    —      —      —      4,500    —      7    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Forwards

   74,918,488    778,100    833,024    5,364    106    —      78,698,264    862,105    843,072    1,983,357    20,587    26,515 

Swaps

   36,026,356    561,985    378,036    6,355,010    222,118    266,887    54,931,441    869,766    823,957    10,221,114    164,394    84,470 

OTC Options

   6,172,661    104,018    110,078    —      —      —      7,782,016    126,932    116,440    —      —      —   

Equity derivatives

   2,744,981    60,395    77,197    —      —      —      3,049,786    82,305    143,084    41,556    8,861    —   

Futures

   1,075,040    13,743    3,154    —      —      —      1,158,638    14,348    20,418    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   1,012,228    21,657    41,439    —      —      —      1,101,352    31,352    69,630    —      —      —   

Forwards

   15,677    410    253    —      —      —      2,615    449    —      —      —      —   

Swaps

   106,228    307    8,922    —      —      —      119,965    3,111    21,499    41,556    8,861    —   

OTC Options

   535,808    24,278    23,429    —      —      —      667,216    33,045    31,537    —      —      —   

Commodity derivatives

   172,973    11,679    10,491    —      —      —      169,734    16,823    14,715    —      —      —   

Futures

   28,568    489    513    —      —      —      7,134    181    389    —      —      —   

Listed Options

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Forwards

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Swaps

   116,525    11,037    9,230    —      —      —      158,139    16,496    13,647    —      —      —   

OTC Options

   27,880    153    748    —      —      —      4,461    146    679    —      —      —   

Credit derivatives

   1,400,080    10,344    8,358    —      —      —      2,285,271    16,502    20,552    —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

  ¥713,415,655   ¥3,390,869   ¥3,156,164   ¥66,678,975   ¥673,113   ¥733,530   ¥1,040,509,649   ¥5,421,152   ¥4,943,842   ¥65,871,751   ¥858,649   ¥611,359 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Derivative financial instruments categorized as “Risk Management” are used for economic hedging, such as managing the exposure to changes in fair value of the loan portfolio, and are identified as hedging instruments under Japanese GAAP. Under IFRS, the SMBC Group started to applyapplies hedge accounting only for certain fixed rate debt securities in issue and borrowings, certain equity instruments elected to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) and net investments in foreign operations, as described below from April 1, 2017, and derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are also categorized as “Risk Management.”

Hedge accounting

On April 1, 2017, the SMBCThe Group started to applyapplies fair value hedge accounting and hedge accounting of net investments in foreign operations in order to reflect the effect of risk management activities on its consolidated financial statements.

Fair value hedges

The Group applies fair value hedge accounting to mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate debt securities in issue and borrowings arising from changes in the interest rate benchmarks, and the risk of changes in the fair value of certain equity instruments elected to be measured at FVOCI. Changes in the fair value of the liabilities arising from changes in the interest rates would not be recognized in profit or loss and those of the equity derivatives would be recognized in profit or loss if it did not apply the hedge accounting. For more information about the interest rate benchmarks to which the Group’s hedging relationships are exposed, see “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform” in this note.

For fair value hedge of interest rate risk, the Group hedges interest rate risk only to the extent of interest rate benchmarks because the changes in fair value of certain fixed rate debt securities in issue and borrowings are significantly influenced by changes in the interest rate benchmarks. The Group designates as hedging instruments interest rate swaps and establishes a hedge ratio by matching the notional of the derivative financial instruments with the principal amount of the hedged items. The Group assesses hedge effectiveness qualitatively by considering whether the critical terms of the hedged items and hedging instruments closely align and quantitatively by comparing changes in the fair value of the hedged items arising from changes in the interest rate benchmarks with those of the hedging instruments. Hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk, timing differences between the hedged items and hedging instruments and the effect of the counterparty or the Group’s own credit risk on the fair value of the interest rate swaps, which is not reflected in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the change in interest rate benchmarks. There are no other sources of hedge ineffectiveness in the hedging relationships. The gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statements. The hedging gain or loss on the hedged item adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged item, and is recognized in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statements. If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting for reasons other than the derecognition of the hedged item, the adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortized to profit or loss over the period to maturity of the hedged item. When the hedged item is derecognized, the adjustment is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statements.

For fair value hedge of stock price risk, the Group designates as hedging instruments equity derivatives with underlying instruments identical to the hedged items and establishes a hedge ratio by aligning the number of shares of hedged items with that of equity derivatives used as hedging instruments. The Group assesses hedge effectiveness qualitatively by considering whether the critical terms of the hedged items and hedging instruments closely align and quantitatively by comparing changes in the fair value of the hedged items with those of the hedging instruments. Hedge ineffectiveness may arise from the effect of the counterparty or the Group’s own credit risk on the fair value of the equity derivatives and interest rate risk on the equity derivatives. There are no other sources of hedge ineffectiveness in the hedging relationships. Both the effective portion and ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments are recognized in other comprehensive income, and amounts presented in other comprehensive income are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss.

The tables below represent the amounts related to items designated as hedging instruments at March 31, 2021 and 2020.

   

Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedging
instrument is included

  At March 31, 2021   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2021
 
   Notional
amounts(1)
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
  Assets   Liabilities 
      (In millions) 

Interest rate risk

    

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative financial instruments  ¥6,199,507   ¥222,553   ¥46,666   ¥(122,874

Stock price risk

          

Equity swaps

  Derivative financial instruments   33,675    —      2,690    (19,215

(1)

At March 31, 2021, the notional amount of interest rate swaps with remaining maturities more than 12 months that are designated hedging instruments against interest rate risk is ¥5,317,746 million out of ¥6,199,507 million in total, and that of equity swaps with remaining maturities more than 12 months that are designated hedging instruments against stock price risk is ¥33,675 million, equal to the total notional amount.

   

Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedging
instrument is included

  At March 31, 2020   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2020
 
   Notional
amounts(1)
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
  Assets   Liabilities 
      (In millions) 

Interest rate risk

    

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative financial instruments  ¥5,723,327   ¥366,092   ¥—     ¥350,446 

Stock price risk

          

Equity swaps

  Derivative financial instruments   41,556    8,861    —      13,889 

(1)

At March 31, 2020, the notional amount of interest rate swaps with remaining maturities more than 12 months that are designated hedging instruments against interest rate risk is ¥5,156,729 million out of ¥5,723,327 million in total, and that of equity swaps with remaining maturities more than 12 months that are designated hedging instruments against stock price risk is ¥41,556 million, equal to the total notional amount.

The amounts related to items designated as hedged items at March 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

   Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedged
item is included
   At March 31, 2021   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2021
 
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
       (In millions) 

Interest rate risk

    

Debt securities in issue

   Debt securities in issue   ¥6,252,899   ¥116,793 

Borrowings

   Borrowings    85,376    2,017 

Stock price risk

      

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   Investment securities    74,564    18,994 
   Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedged
item is included
   At March 31, 2020   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2020
 
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
       (In millions) 

Interest rate risk

    

Debt securities in issue

   Debt securities in issue   ¥5,983,893   ¥(335,998

Borrowings

   Borrowings    78,573    (6,712

Stock price risk

      

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   Investment securities    31,721    (14,126

As for interest rate risk, the accumulated amount of fair value hedge adjustments on the hedged items were a loss of ¥138,456 million and a loss of ¥342,710 million at March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no balances remaining in the consolidated statements of financial position for any hedged items that had ceased to be adjusted for hedging gains and losses at March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As for stock price risk, the accumulated amount of fair value hedge adjustments on the hedged items were a loss of ¥9,508 million and a loss of ¥28,502 million at March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no balances remaining in the consolidated statements of financial position for any hedged items that had ceased to be adjusted for hedging gains and losses at March 31, 2021 and 2020.

As for interest rate risk, hedge ineffectiveness was included in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statements, and amounted to a loss of ¥4,064 million and a profit of ¥7,736 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As for stock price risk, hedge ineffectiveness was included in

“Other comprehensive income—Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, and amounted to a loss of ¥221 million and a loss of ¥237 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Interest Rate Benchmark Reform

Interest rate benchmark reform has been undertaken globally to replace or reform interest rate benchmarks such as interbank offered rates (“IBORs”) with alternative rates. This reform gives rise to uncertainties about the timing or the amount of interest rate benchmark-based cash flows of hedged items or of hedging instruments. As a response, the IASB issued in September 2019 “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform: Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7” that provide temporary relief from applying specific hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships directly affected by interest rate benchmark reform. The reliefs aim to ensure that the interest rate benchmark reform does not result in the discontinuance of hedge accounting.

The Group’s fair value hedge relationships where IBOR-linked derivatives are designated as hedging instruments are directly affected by the interest rate benchmark reform. The hedging instruments offset the risk exposure the Group aims to manage through hedge relationships. USD LIBOR is the significant interest rate benchmark to which hedging relationships are exposed. The notional amounts of hedging instruments directly affected by the interest rate benchmark reform were ¥5,102,495 million and ¥4,586,214 million at March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

In applying the reliefs provided by the amendments, the Group has assumed it is too early to reliably estimate when interest rate benchmark uncertainty will be resolved for all interest rate benchmarks that are in the scope of the amendments at March 31, 2021.

The Group put in place a Group-wide IBOR transition project team in May 2019 involving all the Group’s business lines and functions. This project team’s objective is providing smooth and efficient global coordination for the transition from IBOR to alternative reference rates, expected to take place by the end of 2021 or the mid-2023. Recently the cessation date for certain USD LIBOR settings was extended to be after June 30, 2023 and so the Group’s transition plans have been updated accordingly. The working groups and work streams have continued to execute the plans based on each region’s background for the IBOR transition project, while taking into consideration the common objective and achievement globally.

Hedges of net investments in foreign operations

The Group applies hedge accounting of net investments in foreign operations to mitigate the foreign currency risk onof exchange differences arising from the translation of net investments in foreign operations. The SMBC Group uses currency derivativeshedges the risk of changes in its equity, arising from the movement in the U.S. dollar exchange rate or other exchange rates against Japanese yen. Changes in foreign exchange rates would have an impact on the equity of the Group if it did not apply the hedge accounting.

The Group designates as hedging instruments foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign currency denominated financial liabilitiesliabilities. When the hedging instruments are foreign exchange forward contracts, the Group establishes a hedge ratio where the notional amounts on the foreign exchange forward contracts match the carrying amount of the hedged items. The Group designates as hedging instruments only the changes in the fair value of the spot element of the foreign exchange forward contracts, and assesses hedge effectiveness and calculates hedge ineffectiveness by comparing the changes in the carrying amounts of the hedging instruments that are attributable to a change in the spot rate with the changes in the net investments in foreign operations due to a movement in the spot rate. Therefore, the only sources of hedge ineffectiveness that is expected to arise from these hedging relationships are due to the effect of the counterparty or the Group’s own credit risk on the changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments. There are no other sources of hedge ineffectiveness in these hedge relationships.

When the hedging instruments are foreign currency denominated financial liabilities, the Group designates them as hedging instruments to the extent that the amounts do not exceed those of the hedged items, and establishes the hedge ratio by aligning the amounts of the hedging instruments with those of the hedged items. The Group assesses hedge effectiveness and calculates hedge ineffectiveness by comparing the changes in the carrying amounts of the liabilities that are attributable to a change in the spot rate with the changes in the net investments in foreign operations due to a movement in the spot rate. Therefore, no hedge ineffectiveness arises.

The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instruments is recognized in other comprehensive income, whereas the ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instruments is recognized in net“Net trading incomeincome” in the consolidated income statement.statements. The cumulative gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income is recognized in thereclassified to profit or loss on the disposal or partial disposal of the foreign operation.

At March 31, 2018,operations. On the other hand, changes in the fair valuesvalue of derivativethe forward element of the foreign exchange forward contracts are recognized in “Net trading income” in the consolidated income statements because the Group designates as hedging instruments only the changes in the fair value of the spot element of the foreign exchange forward contracts, as stated above.

The tables below represents the amounts related to items designated as hedging instruments at March 31, 2021 and 2020.

   

Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedging
instrument is included

  At March 31, 2021   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2021
 
   Nominal
amounts
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
  

 

 

 
   Assets   Liabilities 
      (In millions) 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

  Derivative financial instruments  ¥1,963,691   ¥5,269   ¥91,422   ¥(94,786

Foreign currency denominated financial liabilities

  Debt securities in issue, Borrowings, Deposits   91,401    —      91,401    (1,419

   

Line item in the consolidated
statements of financial
position where the hedging
instrument is included

  At March 31, 2020   For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2020
 
   Nominal
amounts
   Carrying amounts   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
 
  Assets   Liabilities 
      (In millions) 

Foreign exchange forward contracts

  Derivative financial instruments  ¥1,943,931   ¥19,864   ¥26,515   ¥29,625 

Foreign currency denominated financial liabilities

  Debt securities in issue, Borrowings, Deposits   180,178    —      180,178    1,844 

The amounts related to items designated as hedged items for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2021
   At March 31, 2021 
   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
   Translating
foreign operations
reserve
 
   (In millions) 

USD foreign operations

  ¥15,137   ¥2,760 

EUR foreign operations

   42,581    38,499 

THB foreign operations

   20,273    20,393 

Other foreign operations

   18,214    20,679 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥96,205   ¥82,331 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2020
  At March 31, 2020 
   Change in value used
for calculating hedge
ineffectiveness
  Translating
foreign operations
reserve
 
   (In millions) 

USD foreign operations

  ¥(14,341 ¥(12,376

EUR foreign operations

   (22,556  (4,083

THB foreign operations

   (15,459  120 

Other foreign operations

   20,887   2,465 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥(31,469 ¥(13,874
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The balances remaining in the foreign currency translation reserve from hedging relationships for which hedge accounting is no longer applied were ¥37,813 million and ¥16,761 million at March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Changes in the translating foreign operations reserve of ¥96,205 million and ¥31,469 million were offset by hedges of net investmentsinvestment in foreign operations were assets of ¥49,440 millionfor the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and liabilities of ¥24,929 million with notional

amounts of ¥1,866,249 million. In addition, the carrying amount of foreign currency denominated financial liabilities designated as hedging instruments was ¥208,294 million.2020, respectively. There waswere no hedge ineffectiveness recognized in “Net trading income” for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2018.2021 and 2020.

Credit derivatives

The SMBC Group enters into credit derivatives to manage the risk of its commercial banking credit portfolio containing loans by hedging economically, as well as diversifying the credit exposure in the portfolio, and to undertake credit loss protection transactions based on the needs from customers as financial intermediation. The tables below provide the notional amounts and the fair value of credit derivatives by purpose of transactions at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
  Protection purchased   Protection sold   Protection purchased   Protection sold 
  Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Managing the SMBC Group’s credit risk portfolio

  ¥442,991   ¥220   ¥5,950   ¥684,080   ¥10,615   ¥751 

Managing the Group’s credit risk portfolio

  ¥1,401,115   ¥643   ¥25,841   ¥1,423,170   ¥23,399   ¥1,863 

Facilitating client transactions

   106,352    87    1,732    86,874    1,127    32    50,902    310    839    20,445    207    2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥549,343   ¥307   ¥7,682   ¥770,954   ¥11,742   ¥    783   ¥1,452,017   ¥953   ¥26,680   ¥1,443,615   ¥23,606   ¥1,865 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2020 
  Protection purchased   Protection sold   Protection purchased   Protection sold 
  Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities   Notional
amounts
   Assets   Liabilities 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Managing the SMBC Group’s credit risk portfolio

  ¥471,994   ¥238   ¥5,141   ¥633,094   ¥7,796   ¥556 

Managing the Group’s credit risk portfolio

  ¥960,225   ¥9,954   ¥5,290   ¥1,193,827   ¥4,957   ¥14,470 

Facilitating client transactions

   139,402    77    2,327    155,590    2,233    334    88,702    1,320    528    42,517    271    264 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥611,396   ¥315   ¥7,468   ¥788,684   ¥10,029   ¥    890   ¥1,048,927   ¥11,274   ¥5,818   ¥1,236,344   ¥5,228   ¥14,734 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table summarizes the notional amounts of the SMBC Group’s credit derivative portfolio by type of counterparty at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2021   At March 31, 2020 
  Protection
purchased
   Protection
sold
   Protection
purchased
   Protection
sold
   Protection
purchased
   Protection
sold
   Protection
purchased
   Protection
sold
 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Banks and broker-dealers

  ¥537,843   ¥770,954   ¥599,896   ¥788,684   ¥1,444,017   ¥1,443,615   ¥1,037,427   ¥1,234,344 

Insurance and other financial guaranty firms

   11,500    —      11,500    —      8,000    —      11,500    2,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥549,343   ¥770,954   ¥611,396   ¥788,684   ¥1,452,017   ¥1,443,615   ¥1,048,927   ¥1,236,344 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

8

FINANCIAL ASSETS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Debt instruments

  ¥1,528,921   ¥1,582,957 

Equity instruments

   18,751    16,136 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥1,547,672   ¥1,599,093 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Debt instruments

  ¥1,667,164   ¥1,454,387 

Equity instruments

   77,684    23,969 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥1,744,848   ¥1,478,356 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The SMBC Group classifies the entire hybrid instrument asDebt instruments in financial assets at fair value through profit or loss when the SMBC Group is required to separate an embedded derivative from its host contract, but is unable to measure the embedded derivative separately either at acquisition or at the endmainly consist of a subsequent reporting period.

The SMBC Group also classifies certain financial assets held by a venture capital investment subsidiary asfunds. Equity instruments in financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. These financial assetsloss mainly consist of non-trading stocks which are managed and their performance is evaluated on anot designated as at fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.through other comprehensive income.

9

INVESTMENT SECURITIES

InvestmentThe following table shows the amount of investment securities, which consist of debt instruments at amortized cost, debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income and equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020.

   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Debt instruments at amortized cost:

    

Domestic:

    

Japanese government bonds

  ¥—     ¥260,079 

Japanese municipal bonds

   22,300    22,300 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   22,300    282,379 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions(1)

   47,129    37,358 

Other debt instruments

   2,586    1,034 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign

   49,715    38,392 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt instruments at amortized cost

  ¥72,015   ¥320,771 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic:

    

Japanese government bonds

  ¥14,293,611   ¥6,785,068 

Japanese municipal bonds

   732,622    240,382 

Japanese corporate bonds

   725,895    579,293 

Other debt instruments

   310    310 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   15,752,438    7,605,053 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

   5,564,944    4,494,686 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions(1)

   2,994,032    2,930,806 

Mortgage-backed securities

   1,658,732    2,807,813 

Other debt instruments

   422,489    215,806 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign

   10,640,197    10,449,111 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

  ¥26,392,635   ¥18,054,164 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Domestic equity instruments

  ¥3,919,787   ¥3,024,731 

Foreign equity instruments

   667,024    464,720 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

  ¥4,586,811   ¥3,489,451 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  ¥31,051,461   ¥21,864,386 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Excludes U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds.

Designation of equity instruments as at fair value through other comprehensive income

The Group designates equity instruments, which are issued by its customers and not held for trading, as at fair value through other comprehensive income. Those equity instruments are held to establish, maintain, and strengthen business ties with those customers. Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2021 and 2020 consisted of the following:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Held-to-maturity investments:

    

Domestic:

    

Japanese government bonds

  ¥372,459   ¥1,160,751 

Japanese municipal bonds

   —      7,463 

Japanese corporate bonds

   —      5,205 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   372,459    1,173,419 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalheld-to-maturity investments

  ¥372,459   ¥1,173,419 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Domestic:

    

Japanese government bonds

  ¥7,685,303   ¥5,722,674 

Japanese municipal bonds

   47,032    82,780 

Japanese corporate bonds

   296,601    363,550 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic debt instruments

   8,028,936    6,169,004 

Equity instruments

   5,161,734    5,117,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   13,190,670    11,286,633 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

   3,246,646    3,468,263 

Bonds issued by other governments and official institutions

   2,187,450    1,669,853 

Mortgage-backed securities

   488,183    633,629 

Other debt instruments

   331,491    183,021 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign debt instruments

   6,253,770    5,954,766 

Equity instruments

   678,176    659,119 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign

   6,931,946    6,613,885 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale financial assets

  ¥20,122,616   ¥17,900,518 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  ¥20,495,075   ¥19,073,937 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Listed

  ¥3,722,813   ¥2,770,473 

Unlisted

   863,998    718,978 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

  ¥4,586,811   ¥3,489,451 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The investments in the listed equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2021 and 2020 mainly consisted of the following:

At March 31,
2021
(In millions)

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION

¥335,460

DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.

200,880

KUBOTA CORPORATION

90,717

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

86,823

NIDEC CORPORATION

81,483

NIPPON PAINT HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

79,747

Ares Management Corporation

75,247

FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation

68,852

DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED

66,258

SG HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

63,932

Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

60,361

MITSUI & CO., LTD.

59,085

Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.

53,755

East Japan Railway Company

53,658

DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO., LTD.

52,236

ITOCHU Corporation

52,132

DAIFUKU CO., LTD.

44,232

Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd.

43,887

Central Japan Railway Company

43,076

KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.

40,385

BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION

40,275

West Japan Railway Company

39,264

Japan Exchange Group, Inc.

39,257

Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd.

37,451

GMO Payment Gateway, Inc.

36,723

Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.

32,632

ASAHI KASEI CORPORATION

32,379

KOMATSU LTD.

30,332

MINEBEA MITSUMI Inc.

28,923

TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

28,767

Makita Corporation

27,523

Shionogi & Co., Ltd.

27,351

At March 31,
2021
(In millions)

Stanley Electric Co., Ltd.

26,507

SHIMANO INC.

26,375

NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

24,691

Square, Inc.

22,822

Oji Holdings Corporation

22,675

TOHO GAS CO., LTD.

22,568

OLYMPUS CORPORATION

22,217

TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION

19,739

OMRON Corporation

18,924

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.

18,281

Sekisui House, Ltd.

17,727

TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC.

17,116

Sanwa Holdings Corporation

15,994

Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated

15,971

BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD.

14,838

TOYODA GOSEI CO., LTD.

14,684

Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.

14,678

KAJIMA CORPORATION.

14,349

Others

1,319,574

Total listed equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

¥3,722,813

At March 31,
2020
(In millions)

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION

¥253,113

DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.

118,530

East Japan Railway Company

61,377

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

61,215

FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation

56,991

NIPPON PAINT HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

56,598

DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED

50,911

KUBOTA CORPORATION

49,742

Central Japan Railway Company

49,208

West Japan Railway Company

47,334

DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO., LTD.

43,154

Japan Exchange Group, Inc.

42,332

Ares Management Corporation

40,825

MITSUI & CO., LTD.

38,590

Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

37,355

Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.

36,263

Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd.

35,165

NIDEC CORPORATION

34,006

ITOCHU Corporation

32,592

SG HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

32,420

KOMATSU LTD.

31,721

BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION

29,907

Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd.

28,178

DAIFUKU CO., LTD.

27,951

Shionogi & Co., Ltd.

24,433

At March 31,
2020
(In millions)

Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.

24,284

TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

19,945

KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.

19,893

ASAHI KASEI CORPORATION

19,430

Makita Corporation

19,229

GMO Payment Gateway, Inc.

18,962

Oji Holdings Corporation

18,336

Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated

18,225

Stanley Electric Co., Ltd.

17,294

MINEBEA MITSUMI Inc.

16,501

TOHO GAS CO., LTD.

16,191

SHIMANO INC.

15,440

OLYMPUS CORPORATION

15,147

NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

14,580

Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated

13,545

The Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated

13,393

Sekisui House, Ltd.

13,325

Hankyu Hanshin Holdings, Inc.

13,020

Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.

12,744

OMRON Corporation

12,331

NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

12,112

TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC.

11,970

Sotetsu Holdings, Inc.

11,354

Odakyu Electric Railway Co., Ltd.

11,169

BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD.

11,129

Others

1,061,013

Total listed equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

¥2,770,473

Disposal of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

The Group sold equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income mainly in order to mitigate the impact of share price fluctuations on the Group’s financial base. The fair value of the equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income at the date of derecognition and the cumulative gain on disposal for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Fair value of the equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income at the date of derecognition

  ¥115,260   ¥210,047 

Cumulative gain on disposal

   46,897    94,443 

The Group transferred the cumulative gain or loss related to the equity instruments that were derecognized or whose significant fair value decline reduced income tax expense for the current reporting period from “Other reserves” to “Retained earnings.” The transferred amount was ¥34,886 million and ¥39,750 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

10

LOANS AND ADVANCES

The following table presentstables present loans and advances at March 31, 20182021 and 2017 by industry classification.2020.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  ¥7,961,620  ¥9,578,147 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   145,957   174,021 

Construction

   947,765   1,151,989 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   5,424,054   5,365,225 

Wholesale and retail

   5,288,767   5,721,005 

Finance and insurance

   2,777,862   2,844,546 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   9,017,664   10,101,846 

Services

   4,255,228   4,885,247 

Municipalities

   1,000,286   1,216,211 

Lease financing

   14,629   2,706,641 

Consumer(1)

   16,363,489   19,096,755 

Others

   4,633,306   5,178,461 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

   57,830,627   68,020,094 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

   

Public sector

   372,008   299,746 

Financial institutions

   4,496,646   4,588,001 

Commerce and industry

   21,023,885   21,041,905 

Lease financing

   357,660   404,658 

Others

   1,779,101   1,836,322 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

   28,029,300   28,170,632 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   85,859,927   96,190,726 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan
fees—net

   (239,181  (236,425

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (491,676  (680,456
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  At March 31, 2021 
  12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Loans and advances at amortized cost:

    

Gross loans and advances

 ¥94,155,246  ¥3,498,733  ¥1,171,576  ¥98,825,555 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan fees—net

     (261,330
    

 

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses

  (170,156  (255,909  (423,222  (849,287
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Carrying amount

    ¥97,714,938 
    

 

 

 

 

(1)The balance in Consumer mainly consists of housing loans. The housing loan balances amounted to ¥11,482,678 million
  At March 31, 2020 
  12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Loans and advances at amortized cost:

    

Gross loans and advances

 ¥92,997,331  ¥1,800,090  ¥845,329  ¥95,642,750 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan fees—net

     (264,527
    

 

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses

  (203,286  (147,382  (355,737  (706,405
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Carrying amount

    ¥94,671,818 
    

 

 

 

For additional information on loans and advances and ¥13,766,771 million at March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Reconciliation of allowance for loan losses is as follows:at March 31, 2021 and 2020, refer to Note 46 “Financial Risk Management.”

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 
   (In millions) 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

   ¥680,456  ¥722,717  ¥793,552 

Provision for loan losses

   126,623   141,457   118,750 

Charge-offs:

    

Domestic

   161,526   157,373   173,431 

Foreign

   23,534   33,135   20,218 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   185,060   190,508   193,649 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Recoveries:

    

Domestic

   9,658   9,852   9,477 

Foreign

   574   445   871 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   10,232   10,297   10,348 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   174,828   180,211   183,301 

Others(1)

   (140,575  (3,507  (6,284
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Allowance for loan losses at end of period  ¥491,676  ¥680,456  ¥722,717 
   

 

  

 

  

 

 
Allowance for loan losses applicable to foreign activities:          

Balance at beginning of period

   ¥128,347  ¥134,664  ¥100,783 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   ¥114,306  ¥128,347  ¥134,664 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

  ¥19,872  ¥29,699  ¥60,002 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Others mainly include the exclusion of the allowance for loans and advances made by Kansai Urban Banking Corporation (“KUBC”) and THE MINATO BANK, LTD. (“The Minato Bank”), both of which had been the Company’s subsidiaries but became its equity-method associates, and the exclusion of the allowance for loans and advances made by SMFL which were reclassified as assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The amount for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 mainly includes foreign exchange transactions.

11

INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES

The following table presents the SMBC Group’s principal associates and joint venture at March 31, 2018.2021. Investments in associates and joint ventures of the SMBC Group are accounted for using the equity method unless they are held for sale.

 

Company Name

 Country of
Incorporation
 Proportion
of Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
 

Main Business

  Country of
Incorporation
   Proportion of
Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
   Main Business 
   (%)   (%)       (%)   (%)     

Principal Associates

             

THE MINATO BANK, LTD.

 Japan  3.9    34.1(2)  Commercial banking

Kansai Urban Banking Corporation

 Japan  47.9    48.1  Commercial banking

The Japan Net Bank, Limited

 Japan  41.1    41.1  Internet banking

PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk

 Indonesia  40.6    40.6  Commercial banking

The Japan Net Bank, Limited(2)

   Japan    46.5    46.5    Internet banking 

The Bank of East Asia, Limited

 China  19.4    19.4  Commercial banking   China    19.6    19.6    Commercial banking 

ACLEDA Bank Plc.

 Cambodia  18.2    18.2  Commercial banking   Cambodia    18.0    18.0    Commercial banking 

Vietnam Export Import Commercial Joint Stock Bank

 Vietnam  15.0    15.0  Commercial banking   Vietnam    15.0    15.0    Commercial banking 

Sumitomo Mitsui Auto Service Company, Limited

 Japan  33.9    33.9  Leasing   Japan    26.8    26.8    Leasing 

NEC Capital Solutions Limited

 Japan  25.0    25.0  Leasing

SMBC Aviation Capital Limited

   Ireland    32.0    32.0    Leasing 

POCKET CARD CO., LTD.

 Japan  20.0    20.0  Credit card   Japan    20.0    20.0    Credit card 

SAKURA KCS Corporation

   Japan    29.7    29.7    
System engineering
and data processing
 
 

JSOL Corporation

  Japan   50.0    50.0  System development and data processing   Japan    50.0    50.0    
System development
and data processing
 
 

Sakura Information Systems Co., Ltd.

  Japan   49.0    49.0  System engineering and data processing   Japan    49.0    49.0    
System engineering
and data processing
 
 

Daiwa SB Investments Ltd.

  Japan   43.9    43.9  Investment advisory and investment trust management

China Post & Capital Fund Management Co., Ltd.

  


China

   23.6    23.6  Investment advisory and investment trust management  

 

China

 

  

 

23.6

 

  

 

23.6

 

  

 


Investment
management, and
investment advisory
and agency

 
 
 
 

Principal Joint Venture

             

Daiwa Securities SMBC Principal Investments Co., Ltd.

  


Japan

   40.0    40.0  Investments, fund management

Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited

  

 

 

 

Japan

 

 

  

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

  

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

  

 

 

 

Leasing

 

 

 

(1)

Percentages of proportion of ownership interest and proportion of voting rights have been truncated.

(2)

The SMBC Group has a 3.9% direct holding in THE MINATO BANK, LTD., and can exercise a further 30.2% of the voting rights held by SMBC’s retirement benefit trust under contractual agreements between SMBC and the retirement benefit trust.Japan Net Bank, Limited changed its corporate name to PayPay Bank Corporation on April 5, 2021.

The SMBC Group accounts for certain investees, including The Bank of East Asia, Limited, ACLEDA Bank Plc. and Vietnam Export Import Commercial Joint Stock Bank, as associates regardless of its below 20% holdings of the voting rights to these investees, since the SMBC Group has the ability to exercise significant influence over these investees through participation in the policy making process at the meeting of the board of directors, the provision of essential technical information, or other relevant agreements or relationships.

On the other hand, the SMBC Group accounts for certain investees as available-for-sale financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income or financial assets at fair value through profit or loss regardless of its 20% or more holdings of the voting rights to these investees becausewhen the SMBC Group has contracts or arrangements with other investors by which the SMBC Group loses the power to exert significant influence over such investees.

THE MINATO BANK, LTD. and Kansai Urban Banking Corporation ceased to be consolidated subsidiaries of the SMBC Group and became its associates during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The SMBC group received a cash consideration of ¥88,389 million for losing control of these companies. The total amount of cash and cash equivalents in these companies was ¥940,568 million. Total amounts of assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in these companies were ¥7,314,397 million and ¥7,883,267 million, respectively. As a result of remeasuring the interests retained in these companies at fair value, the SMBC Group recognized losses of ¥22,037 million, which are included in “Other expenses” in the consolidated income statement. On the other hand, the SMBC Group recognized profit of ¥19,392 million through above-mentioned transition, which are included in “Other income” in the consolidated income statement.

The SMBC Group has interests in a number of associates and joint ventures, none of which are regarded as individually material. The following table summarizes, in aggregate, the financial information of all individually immaterial associates and joint ventures that are accounted for using the equity method:

 

  At and for the fiscal year ended
March 31,
   At and for the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
          2018                   2017                   2021                   2020         
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Carrying amount of investments in associates and joint ventures

  ¥730,414   ¥675,704   ¥886,685   ¥826,736 

Share of:

        

Profit from continuing operations

   49,323    29,318    36,373    24,031 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   7,885    (21,602   9,335    (11,605

Total comprehensive income

   57,208    7,716    45,708    12,426 

There are no significant restrictions on the ability of associates or joint ventures to transfer funds to the SMBC Group in the form of cash dividends, repayment of loans and advances.

12

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The table below shows the changes in property, plant and equipment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  Assets for
rent
  Land  Buildings  Leased
assets
  Others  Total 
  (In millions) 

Cost

 ¥1,833,990  ¥518,564  ¥760,244  ¥16,741  ¥431,178  ¥3,560,717 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (288,630  (5,745  (384,565  (9,183  (281,643  (969,766
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at April 1, 2016

  1,545,360   512,819   375,679   7,558   149,535   2,590,951 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  320,921   1,268   15,117   1,704   41,292   380,302 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

�� 52,636   20   604   4   547   53,811 

Disposals

  (152,172  (3,058  (1,089  (74  (1,771  (158,164

Depreciation

  (88,198  —     (24,507  (2,102  (29,749  (144,556

Impairment losses

  —     (453  (5,618  —     (325  (6,396

Exchange differences

  (9,670  —     (192  —     (425  (10,287

Others

  (9,961  3,896   10,813   97   (24,451  (19,606
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

  1,658,916   514,492   370,807   7,187   134,653   2,686,055 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost

  2,086,804   520,078   774,233   17,837   425,728   3,824,680 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (427,888  (5,586  (403,426  (10,650  (291,075  (1,138,625
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2017

  1,658,916   514,492   370,807   7,187   134,653   2,686,055 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  415,397   44   30,144   1,775   54,951   502,311 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

  304,233   —     —     —     24   304,257 

Disposals(1)

  (1,640,222  (52,327  (33,796  (660  (10,064  (1,737,069

Depreciation

  (91,906  —     (21,344  (2,061  (30,663  (145,974

Impairment losses

  —     (2,446  (25,203  (136  (31  (27,816

Exchange differences

  (66,033  (4  (284  (3  (506  (66,830

Others

  302   (192  11,673   47   (16,632  (4,802
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

  580,687   459,567   331,997   6,149   131,732   1,510,132 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost

  607,769   466,046   738,023   17,373   413,945   2,243,156 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (27,082  (6,479  (406,026  (11,224  (282,213  (733,024
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2018

 ¥580,687  ¥459,567  ¥331,997  ¥6,149  ¥131,732  ¥1,510,132 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Disposals include property, plant and equipment owned by SMFL reclassified as “Assets held for sale” during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. In addition, Disposals include property, plant and equipment related to KUBC and The Minato Bank, both of which had been the Company’s subsidiaries but became its equity method associates in March, 2018.
  Assets for
rent
  Land  Buildings  Right of use
assets
  Others  Total 
  (In millions) 

Cost

 ¥609,763  ¥469,095  ¥746,687  ¥440,790  ¥394,308  ¥2,660,643 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (45,302  (4,998  (408,187  (34,609  (279,129  (772,225
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at April 1, 2019

  564,461   464,097   338,500   406,181   115,179   1,888,418 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  18,700   355   16,862   66,621   50,297   152,835 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

  —     1   226   787   95   1,109 

Disposals

  (14,600  (3,921  (847  (2,664  (929  (22,961

Depreciation

  (17,990  —     (23,114  (92,991  (23,073  (157,168

Impairment losses

  (69,796  (432  (8,098  (3  (1,618  (79,947

Exchange differences

  (8,028  (1,093  (514  (2,783  (1,705  (14,123

Others

  (6,287  3,479   11,913   1,610   (14,267  (3,552
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

  466,460   462,486   334,928   376,758   123,979   1,764,611 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost

  571,346   467,636   759,576   484,431   414,212   2,697,201 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (104,886  (5,150  (424,648  (107,673  (290,233  (932,590
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2020

  466,460   462,486   334,928   376,758   123,979   1,764,611 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

  11,092   —     18,664   93,162   84,848   207,766 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

  —     —     60   —     9   69 

Disposals

  (2,305  (8,784  (8,715  (6,243  (1,311  (27,358

Depreciation

  (15,493  —     (22,340  (93,793  (21,312  (152,938

Impairment losses

  —     (314  (9,053  (322  (1,270  (10,959

Exchange differences

  (23,768  909   598   3,200   1,400   (17,661

Others

  1,749   33,363   49,821   240   (94,042  (8,869
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

  437,735   487,660   363,963   373,002   92,301   1,754,661 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost

  551,598   492,499   809,153   536,305   397,768   2,787,323 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

  (113,863  (4,839  (445,190  (163,303  (305,467  (1,032,662
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2021

 ¥437,735  ¥487,660  ¥363,963  ¥373,002  ¥92,301  ¥1,754,661 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The impairment losses on property, plant and equipment are included in “Other expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

The SMBC Group had ¥2,626¥8,532 million and ¥2,773,096¥48,707 million of contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Recognition of Impairment Losses

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, the market and economic environment adversely affected the profitability of the railcar leasing business in the United States, and led the Group to recognize impairment losses of ¥69,796 million on the railcars to be leased. To determine whether they might be impaired, the Group identified the cash-generating units based on similarities in the nature and use in the railcar leasing business. The carryingrecoverable amount of itemsthose impaired assets was principally determined based on the value in use. The discount rate used to estimate the recoverable amount of property, plant and equipment on which therethe assets for rent was a restriction on title was ¥6,149 million and ¥7,187 million at March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.approximately 6%.

 

13

LEASES

As Lessee

The SMBC Group leases land and buildings, office equipment, and other tangible and intangible assets from third parties under finance leases or operating leases.lease contracts.

Carrying amountRight of use assets held under finance leases

The carrying amount of right of use assets held under finance leases at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Tangible assets:

    

Land and buildings

  ¥2,837   ¥3,295 

Other tangible assets(1)

   3,312    3,892 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(2)

   6,149    7,187 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intangible assets:

    

Software

   144    185 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥6,293   ¥7,372 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Net carrying
amount
   Depreciation 
   At March 31,   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021   2020   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Land and buildings

  ¥  341,256   ¥  344,624   ¥  81,930   ¥  81,291 

Other tangible assets(1)

   31,746    32,134    11,863    11,700 

Intangible assets(2)

   6,949    9,210    3,239    3,154 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥379,951   ¥385,968   ¥97,032   ¥96,145 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Other tangible assets include mainly office equipment, machinery and vehicles.

(2)Cross-reference to Leased

Intangible assets in Note 12 “Property, Plant and Equipment.”include mainly software.

The additions of right of use assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 were ¥94,157 million and ¥67,685 million, respectively. The Group leases mainly land and buildings for its head offices and branches.

Finance lease commitmentsLease liabilities

The totalmaturity analysis of future minimum lease payments and their present value under finance leasesliabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  At March 31, 
  2018 2017   At March 31,
2021
 At March 31,
2020
 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Not later than one year

  ¥2,567  ¥27,901   ¥82,237  ¥78,719 

Later than one year and not later than five years

   4,664  78,958    178,977  176,426 

Later than five years

   3,086  6,129    134,738  145,722 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   10,317  112,988    395,952  400,867 

Less: Future interest charges

   (1,151 (6,064   (15,311 (14,979
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Present value of finance lease commitments(1)

  ¥9,166  ¥106,924 

Lease liabilities(1)

  ¥380,641  ¥385,888 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Present value of finance lease commitments

Lease liabilities is included in “Borrowings” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. See Note 1819 “Borrowings.”

At March 31, 2018 and 2017, the total amounts of future minimum sublease payments to be received undernon-cancellable subleases were nil and ¥108,351 million, respectively.

Operating lease commitments

The total amounts of future minimum lease payments undernon-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Not later than one year

  ¥42,329   ¥44,746 

Later than one year and not later than five years

   129,298    124,946 

Later than five years

   121,419    129,312 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total future minimum lease payments undernon-cancellable operating leases

  ¥293,046   ¥299,004 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016, ¥50,561 million, ¥49,0472020, ¥2,808 million and ¥50,801¥2,896 million were recognized as interests on lease liabilities, respectively and ¥98,421 million and ¥98,728 million were recognized as total cash outflow for leases, respectively.

Operating lease commitments at March 31, 2019

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, ¥52,465 million was recognized as expenses in respect of operating lease and sublease agreements, of which ¥50,058 million, ¥48,527 million and ¥50,278¥52,155 million related to minimum lease payments, and ¥503 million, ¥520 million and ¥523¥310 million related to sublease payments, respectively.payments. Lease expenses recognized in respect of lease and sublease agreements are included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

As Lessor

The SMBC Group leases assets to third parties under finance leases or operating leases, including machinery, equipment, aircraft, vessel and property.

At March 31, 2018, the assets and liabilities of SMFL were reclassified as held for sale due to the reorganization of the joint leasing partnership. As a result, the balances of finance lease receivable and operating lease receivable decreased.

Finance lease receivable

The gross investment in the lease, unearned finance income, present valuematurity analysis of the minimum lease payments receivable, and unguaranteed residual values under finance leasesshowing the undiscounted lease payments to be received at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

 At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
 Gross investment
in the lease
 Unearned
finance

income
 Present value of
the minimum
lease payments
receivable(1)
 Unguaranteed
residual values(1)
   Undiscounted
lease
payments
   Unearned
finance
income
   Discounted
lease
payments(1)
   Unguaranteed
residual
values(1)
 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Not later than one year

 ¥54,501  ¥13,470  ¥41,031  ¥6,483   ¥45,950   ¥10,003   ¥35,947   ¥5,283 

Later than one year and not later than five years

 227,793  29,746  198,047  43,206 

Later than one year and not later than two years

   33,889    9,418    24,471    12,113 

Later than two years and not later than three years

   39,618    8,507    31,111    3,156 

Later than three years and not later than four years

   42,137    7,197    34,940    10,755 

Later than four years and not later than five years

   45,051    6,444    38,607    5,297 

Later than five years

 73,979  11,574  62,405  21,117    186,650    69,054    117,596    12,390 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥356,273  ¥54,790  ¥301,483  ¥70,806   ¥393,295   ¥110,623   ¥282,672   ¥48,994 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
 At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2020 
 Gross investment
in the lease
 Unearned
finance

income
 Present value of
the minimum
lease payments
receivable(1)
 Unguaranteed
residual values(1)
   Undiscounted
lease
payments
   Unearned
finance
income
   Discounted
lease
payments(1)
   Unguaranteed
residual
values(1)
 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Not later than one year

 ¥1,023,842  ¥91,070  ¥932,772  ¥16,831   ¥40,225   ¥10,544   ¥29,681   ¥2,814 

Later than one year and not later than five years

 1,841,026  155,534  1,685,492  112,474 

Later than one year and not later than two years

   104,817    9,528    95,289    15,211 

Later than two years and not later than three years

   33,160    6,565    26,595    2,670 

Later than three years and not later than four years

   27,542    4,660    22,882    1,102 

Later than four years and not later than five years

   58,947    3,446    55,501    11,663 

Later than five years

 343,332  38,960  304,372  59,358    45,724    6,123    39,601    14,902 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥3,208,200  ¥285,564  ¥2,922,636  ¥188,663   ¥310,415   ¥40,866   ¥269,549   ¥48,362 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Present value of the minimum

Discounted lease payments receivable and unguaranteed residual values are included in “Loans and advances” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position.

Accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimumnet investment in the lease payments receivable was ¥1,828amounting to ¥1,072 million and ¥10,827¥502 million were measured under IFRS 9 at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, ¥9,514 million and ¥11,268 million were recognized as finance income on net investment in the lease, respectively.

Operating lease receivable

The total amounts of the future minimum lease payments receivable undernon-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  At March 31, 
  2018   2017   At March 31, 2021   At March 31, 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Not later than one year

  ¥38,072   ¥215,329   ¥26,602   ¥31,499 

Later than one year and not later than five years

   70,813    790,394 

Later than one year and not later than two years

   20,210    24,137 

Later than two years and not later than three years

   13,248    16,935 

Later than three years and not later than four years

   9,123    11,799 

Later than four years and not later than five years

   5,763    7,148 

Later than five years

   18,857    484,896    10,416    12,636 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥127,742   ¥1,490,619   ¥85,362   ¥104,154 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, ¥34,426 million and ¥40,588 million were recognized as income from operating leases, respectively.

 

14

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The table below shows the changes in goodwill by business segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

   Wholesale
Business Unit
  Retail
Business Unit
   International
Business Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Gross amount of goodwill

  ¥—    ¥63,418   ¥13,233  ¥397,285  ¥473,936 

Accumulated impairment losses

   —     —      —     (13,149  (13,149
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2016

   —     63,418    13,233   384,136   460,787 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Acquisitions(1)

   2,417   —      —     38,053   40,470 

Impairment losses

   —     —      —     (74,616  (74,616

Exchange differences

   —     —      (186  —     (186
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

   2,417   63,418    13,047   347,573   426,455 

Gross amount of goodwill

   2,417   63,418    13,047   435,338   514,220 

Accumulated impairment losses

   —     —      —     (87,765  (87,765
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2017

   2,417   63,418    13,047   347,573   426,455 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Disposals(2)

   —     —      —     (11,197  (11,197

Impairment losses

   (956  —      (4,292  (23,359  (28,607

Reclassification to assets held for sale(3)

   (1,461  —      (8,166  (102,710  (112,337

Exchange differences

   —     —      (589  —     (589
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

   —     63,418    —     210,307   273,725 

Gross amount of goodwill

   956   63,418    4,292   321,431   390,097 

Accumulated impairment losses

   (956  —      (4,292  (111,124  (116,372
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2018

  ¥—    ¥63,418   ¥—    ¥210,307  ¥273,725 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Retail
Business Unit
  Global
Business Unit
  Head office
account and
others
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Gross amount of goodwill(1)

  ¥63,418  ¥4,707  ¥210,307  ¥278,432 

Accumulated impairment losses(1)

   —     —     (62,624  (62,624
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2019

   63,418   4,707   147,683   215,808 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Acquisitions(2)

   —     —     31,647   31,647 

Disposals

   (1,466  —     —     (1,466

Exchange differences

   —     (843  (1,319  (2,162
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

   61,952   3,864   178,011   243,827 

Gross amount of goodwill(1)

   61,952   3,864   240,635   306,451 

Accumulated impairment losses(1)

   —     —     (62,624  (62,624
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2020

   61,952   3,864   178,011   243,827 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Impairment losses

   —     —     (42,398  (42,398

Exchange differences

   —     586   1,876   2,462 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount

   61,952   4,450   137,489   203,891 

Gross amount of goodwill(1)

   61,952   4,450   242,511   308,913 

Accumulated impairment losses(1)

   —     —     (105,022  (105,022
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2021

  ¥61,952  ¥4,450  ¥137,489  ¥203,891 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

The SMBCgoodwill which all amounts have been impaired is excluded from gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses.

(2)

The Group recognized goodwill of ¥2,417 million in Wholesale Business Unit resulting from the acquisition of SMFL Capital Company, Limited, formerly known as GE Japan in April 2016 and ¥38,053¥17,022 million in Head office account and others resulting from the acquisition of Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited (“SMAM”) in July 2016. For additional information, refer to Note 49 “Acquisitions.”

(2)“Disposals” in Head office account and others includes amount of goodwill relating to Kansai Urban Banking Corporation (“KUBC”) which ceased to be its consolidated subsidiaries and became its associates during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
(3)The SMBC Group reclassified goodwill of ¥112,337 million allocated to Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited (“SMFL”) and its subsidiaries to assets held for sale at March 31, 2018.Daiwa SB Investments Ltd. on April 1, 2019. For additional information, refer to Note 50 “Assets and Disposal Groups Held for Sale.“Acquisitions.

The SMBC Group has four main business segments: the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit, the InternationalGlobal Business Unit and the Global Markets Business Unit, with the remaining operations recorded in the Head office account and others. The SMBC Group changed its business segment information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 in connection with the introduction of Group-wide business units, which determine strategies for each customer segment across the SMBC Group companies. The business was previously reported as Commercial Banking, Leasing, Securities and Consumer Finance, with the remaining operations recorded in Others. Comparative information has been restated.

Impairment testing of goodwill

Allocating goodwill to cash-generating units

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units or group of cash-generating units, which represent the lowest level within the entity at which goodwill is monitored for internal purposes.

At March 31, 2018,2021, the SMBC Group allocated goodwill to the Retail Business Unit of SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Consumer Finance”) amounting to ¥56,692 million and to the Head office account and others of SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. (“SMBC Nikko Securities”) and SMAMSumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited (“SMDAM”) amounting to ¥172,253¥109,629 million and ¥38,053¥12,678 million, respectively.

At March 31, 2017,2020, the SMBC Group allocated goodwill to the Retail Business Unit of SMBC Consumer Finance amounting to ¥56,692 million and to the Head office account and others of SMBC Nikko Securities SMFL, SMAM, SMBC Trust Bank Ltd. (“SMBC Trust Bank”), and KUBCSMDAM amounting to ¥172,253 million, ¥102,710 million, ¥38,053 million, ¥23,359¥109,629 million and ¥11,197¥55,076 million, respectively.

The aggregate amounts of other goodwill were ¥6,727¥24,892 million and ¥22,191¥22,430 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and they were not considered individually significant.

Timing of impairment tests

The SMBC Group performs impairment tests at least annually and whenever there is an indication that the cash-generating unit may be impaired.

Recoverable amount of cash-generating units

To determine whether an impairment loss shall be recognized, the carrying amount of a cash-generating unit is compared to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.

Fair value less costs to sell: The fair value less costs to sell is determined using an observable market price in the active market or unobservable inputs for the cash-generating unit at the date of the impairment test. The SMBC Group determined the recoverable amount of SMBC Friend Securities Co., Ltd. (“SMBC Friend Securities”), which was merged with SMBC Nikko Securities on January 1, 2018, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and SMFL for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, based on the fair value less costs to sell.

Value in use: The value in use is determined based on discounted future cash flows, which are based on the financial plans which have been approved by management and which are valid when the impairment test is performed. The financial plans are prepared taking into account the current economic and regulatory environment, direction of the regulation and business forecasts of the individual cash-generating units. The SMBC Group determined the recoverable amounts of the primary cash-generating units based on the value in use other than the recoverable amount of SMBC Friend Securities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and SMFL for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.use.

The financial plans, which are used to estimate the cash flow projections of the cash-generating units, cover three to five years. The cash flow projections beyond the period covered by the financial plans are extrapolated by applying the appropriate growth rates in perpetuity.

Key assumptions used in impairment testing

The key assumptions used for the value in use calculations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  SMBC Trust Bank KUBC  SMFL  SMBC
Nikko
Securities
  SMBC
Consumer
Finance
  SMAM   SMBC
Nikko
Securities
 SMBC
Consumer
Finance
 SMDAM 
Corporate
Business
 Retail
Banking(1)
 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

        

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

    

Pre-tax discount rate

   12.61 9.91  —     —    11.42 11.20 9.01   8.42 9.73 12.80

Growth rate

   1.00 1.00  —     —    1.00 1.00 1.00   1.00 1.00 1.00

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

        

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

    

Pre-tax discount rate

   9.75 6.52 6.24 6.63 8.12 10.58 7.17   9.60 9.28 7.61

Growth rate

   1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00   1.00 1.00 1.00

 

(1)The business which SMBC Trust Bank acquired from Citibank Japan Ltd., in November 2015 is identified as Retail Banking.

Management considers that thepre-tax discount rates and the growth rates are the most sensitive key assumptions to determine the value in use of the cash-generating units.

Pre-tax discount rate: Thepre-tax discount rates used to estimate the discounted cash flow of the primary cash-generating units are determined based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”). The risk-free interest rate, the market risk premium and the beta factor that are used in the CAPM are determined based on market data and other external sources of information. The beta factor is determined based on a respective group of peer companies of the cash-generating units.

Growth rate: The growth rates used to estimate the cash flow projections beyond the period covered by the financial plans, which shall cover a maximum period of five years, are determined based on the expected long-term inflation rate and long-term average growth rates for the industries. The growth rate does not exceed the long-term growth rate for the industry in which the cash-generating unit operates.

Management believes that there were no reasonably possible changes in any of the key assumptions that would lead to the recoverable amounts of the cash-generating units being below these carrying amounts for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

Recognition of Impairment Losses

If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit is reduced to its recoverable amount, and this reduction is recognized as impairment loss of goodwill.

The recoverable amount of SMBC Trust BankSMDAM was determined based on the value in use. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018,2021, the value in use of SMBC Trust BankSMDAM decreased to less than its carrying amount, primarily due to the revision of the business plan and the key assumptions. As a result, the SMBC Group recognized an impairment loss of ¥23,359¥42,398 million equal to the total carrying amount ofon the goodwill relating to the SMBC Trust Bank,SMDAM for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

The recoverable amount of SMBC Friend Securities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was determined based on the value in use. However, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the value in use of

SMBC Friend Securities decreased to less than fair value less costs to sell, primarily due to the revision of the business plan. Therefore, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the SMBC Group determined the recoverable amount of SMBC Friend Securities based on the fair value less costs to sell, which was measured based on net asset value and categorized within level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. As a result, the SMBC Group recognized an impairment loss of ¥74,616 million, equal to the total carrying amount of the goodwill relating to SMBC Friend Securities, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2021.

The impairment losses on goodwill are included in “Other expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Other intangible assets

The table below shows the changes in other intangible assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 Internally
generated
software
 Purchased
software
 Contractual
customer
relationships
 Trademarks Other
intangibles
 Total  Internally
generated
software
 Purchased
software
 Contractual
customer
relationships
 Trademarks Other
intangibles
 Total 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Cost

 ¥591,118  ¥346,819  ¥172,950  ¥41,828  ¥58,368  ¥1,211,083  ¥697,480  ¥358,130  ¥185,795  ¥55,822  ¥99,362  ¥1,396,589 

Accumulated amortization and impairment losses

 (317,309 (212,356 (58,321 (26,007 (9,784 (623,777 (395,399 (229,076 (93,721 (42,964 (17,697 (778,857
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net carrying amount at April 1, 2016

 273,809  134,463  114,629  15,821  48,584  587,306 

Net carrying amount at April 1, 2019

 302,081  129,054  92,074  12,858  81,665  617,732 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

 102,193  41,080   —     —    2,228  145,501  97,895  42,435   —     —    8,673  149,003 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

 879  851  76,027  4,288  9,623  91,668   —    165  4,271   —    20,082  24,518 

Disposals

 (1,376 (2,379  —     —    (1,452 (5,207 (241 (1,792  —     —    (1,543 (3,576

Amortization

 (82,158 (40,722 (20,192 (4,256 (4,579 (151,907 (90,154 (44,129 (11,652 (2,741 (10,616 (159,292

Impairment losses

  —    (97  —     —    (75 (172  —    (8 (7,262  —    (21,419 (28,689

Exchange differences

 (32 2   —     —    (15 (45 (174 (2,613 (2,334 (1,475 (4,463 (11,059

Others

 (1,178 6,499   —     —    (2,352 2,969  (2,349 10,237   —     —    (4,875 3,013 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net carrying amount

 292,137  139,697  170,464  15,853  51,962  670,113  307,058  133,349  75,097  8,642  67,504  591,650 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost

 648,463  372,531  248,977  46,116  64,487  1,380,574  726,459  379,524  187,705  54,329  116,951  1,464,968 

Accumulated amortization and impairment losses

 (356,326 (232,834 (78,513 (30,263 (12,525 (710,461 (419,401 (246,175 (112,608 (45,687 (49,447 (873,318
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2017

 292,137  139,697  170,464  15,853  51,962  670,113 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2020

 307,058  133,349  75,097  8,642  67,504  591,650 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

 93,977  40,024   —     —    2,169  136,170  117,470  51,886   —     —    9,920  179,276 

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

  —    222   —     —     —    222   —    8   —     —    2  10 

Disposals(1)

 (8,420 (11,928 (57,987  —    (1,844 (80,179

Disposals

 (27 (1,027  —     —    (25 (1,079

Amortization

 (84,662 (43,818 (20,192 (4,280 (4,473 (157,425 (90,580 (43,931 (11,982 (931 (9,744 (157,168

Impairment losses

  —     —    (1,830  —    (5,229 (7,059  —    (447  —     —    (1 (448

Exchange differences

 142  (731  —     —    (29 (618 134  1,380  2,081  1,167  3,344  8,106 

Others

 343  2,099   —     —    (1,489 953  584  (496  —     —    (4,606 (4,518
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net carrying amount

 293,517  125,565  90,455  11,573  41,067  562,177  334,639  140,722  65,196  8,878  66,394  615,829 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost

 650,632  340,593  172,950  46,116  54,024  1,264,315  788,808  412,032  189,900  55,573  125,913  1,572,226 

Accumulated amortization and impairment losses

 (357,115 (215,028 (82,495 (34,543 (12,957 (702,138 (454,169 (271,310 (124,704 (46,695 (59,519 (956,397
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2018

 ¥293,517  ¥125,565  ¥90,455  ¥11,573  ¥41,067  ¥562,177 

Net carrying amount at March 31, 2021

 ¥334,639  ¥140,722  ¥65,196  ¥8,878  ¥66,394  ¥615,829 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other intangible assets related to the acquisition of the retail banking business of Citibank Japan Ltd were tested for impairment because changes in the market conditions indicated that the carrying amount of these assets might not be recoverable at March 31, 2020. The cash-generating unit of these assets was SMBC Trust Bank’s retail banking business unit. In the impairment test, the carrying amount of SMBC Trust Bank’s retail banking business unit was compared against its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount determined based on the value in use was less than its carrying amount, primarily due to the revision of the business plan. As a result, the Group recognized an impairment loss of ¥28,679 million, equal to the total carrying amount of these intangible assets for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. The pre-tax discount rate used to estimate the value in use of SMBC Trust Bank’s retail banking business unit was approximately 8%.

(1)Disposals include other intangible assets owned by SMFL reclassified as “Assets held for sale” during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

The impairment losses on other intangible assets are included in “Other expenses” and the amortization expenses of other intangible assets are included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

The SMBC Group had ¥383 million and ¥317 million of contractual commitments to acquire intangible assets at March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The amounts of research and development expenditure recognized as expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were ¥84¥60 million, ¥89¥78 million and ¥207¥167 million, respectively, and they were included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Other intangibles at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 include leasehold rights, amounting to ¥5,436¥6,619 million and ¥6,825¥6,423 million, respectively, which are rights to use land for the purpose of owning the buildings. Since the SMBC Group has a long history of renewal, these contracts are not expected to be terminated in the foreseeable future. Leasehold rights are expected to generate cash flows for an indefinite period of time. They are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually, irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment.

 

15

OTHER ASSETS

Other assets at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Prepaid expenses

  ¥49,300   ¥72,594 

Accrued income

   416,210    380,018 

Receivables from brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions

   1,175,495    1,438,977 

Cash collateral provided for derivative and other financial transactions

   1,560,972    1,089,481 

Retirement benefit assets

   316,455    257,744 

Security deposits

   99,247    115,064 

Investment properties(1)(2)

   13,889    436,985 

Others

   412,340    530,861 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other assets

  ¥4,043,908   ¥4,321,724 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Investment properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Rental income from investment properties was ¥29,427 million, ¥25,322 million and ¥20,879 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Investment properties decreased due to the exclusion of those owned by SMFL reclassified as assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Prepaid expenses

  ¥73,737   ¥65,129 

Accrued income

   308,024    330,654 

Receivables from brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions

   1,294,607    1,221,414 

Cash collateral provided for derivative and other financial transactions

   2,000,222    2,121,025 

Retirement benefit assets

   518,934    168,962 

Security deposits

   87,578    88,518 

Others

   662,529    276,928 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other assets

  ¥4,945,631   ¥4,272,630 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

16

DEPOSITS

Deposits at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

  ¥21,611,514   ¥19,853,552   ¥28,269,215   ¥25,307,775 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   52,154,265    51,281,995    68,635,578    59,772,689 

Deposits at notice

   10,355,664    10,330,269    11,462,658    10,769,494 

Time deposits

   25,655,132    29,525,875    25,818,987    25,023,508 

Negotiable certificates of deposit

   11,220,285    11,880,938    12,570,618    10,180,436 

Others(1)

   7,464,667    7,422,661    8,736,598    7,377,516 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

  ¥128,461,527   ¥130,295,290   ¥155,493,654   ¥138,431,418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Others include, among other items, foreign currency deposits in domestic offices and Japanese yen accounts held by foreign depositors in domestic offices.

17

TRADING LIABILITIES

Trading liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Debt instruments “short position”

  ¥2,008,711   ¥2,038,330   ¥2,002,591   ¥1,915,687 

Equity instruments “short position”

   135,188    33,254    78,235    102,797 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total trading liabilities

  ¥2,143,899   ¥2,071,584   ¥  2,080,826   ¥  2,018,484 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Trading liabilities include the instruments classified as held for trading. Trading debt instruments mainly consist of Japanese government bonds. Trading equity instruments mainly consist of publicly traded Japanese stocks.

18

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss at March 31, 2021 and 2020 consisted of the following:

   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Borrowings

  ¥24,971   ¥—   

Debt securities in issue

   214,548    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥239,519   ¥—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

From April 1, 2020, the Group adopted the fair value option for certain financial liabilities which were issued by the Group’s securities subsidiary. As part of risk management, the Group enters into derivative transactions to offset the profit or loss of financial liabilities containing embedded derivatives, designated at fair value through profit or loss (“FVPL”) under the fair value option. The carrying amount of financial liabilities designated at FVPL at March 31, 2021 was ¥2,980 million more than the contractual amount required to be paid at maturity. The cumulative losses arising from changes in own credit risk of financial liabilities designated at FVPL were ¥4,981 million at March 31, 2021.

19

BORROWINGS

Borrowings at March 31, 2021 and 2020 consisted of the following:

   At March 31, 
  2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Unsubordinated borrowings

  ¥17,565,291   ¥15,208,696 

Subordinated borrowings

   249,833    254,064 

Liabilities associated with securitization transactions

   1,227,590    1,272,714 

Lease liabilities

   380,641    385,888 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total borrowings

  ¥19,423,355   ¥17,121,362 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

1820BORROWINGS

Short-term borrowings and long-term borrowings (with original maturities of more than one year) at March 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:

       At March 31, 
   Interest rate   2018   2017 
       (In millions) 

SMFG:

      

Long-term borrowings:

      

Unsubordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2022-2031

   2.89%-3.87%   ¥31,875   ¥33,657 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Australian dollars, due 2027

   3.73%    8,165    —   

Floating rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2026-2028

   2.31%-3.76%    110,181    50,149 

Subordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2024-2031

   0.56%-1.27%    49,000    49,000 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total SMFG

     199,221    132,806 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

SMBC:

      

Short-term borrowings

   0.00%-2.18%    3,521,478    6,640,069 

Long-term borrowings:

      

Unsubordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2017-2028

   0.00%-6.10%    3,126,970    4,351 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2017-2025

   0.00%-4.17%    42,666    45,387 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in euros, due 2017-2045

   0.00%-3.50%    122,023    101,492 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2018-2037

   (0.18%)-0.02%    59,500    68,000 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2017-2033

   1.18%-3.45%    894,797    904,263 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in euros, due 2021-2022

   0.00%-0.06%    32,128    31,769 

Subordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2018-2027

   1.28%-2.25%    216,000    226,000 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total SMBC

     8,015,562    8,021,331 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other subsidiaries:

      

Short-term borrowings

   0.09%-7.91%    421,662    906,427 

Long-term borrowings:

      

Unsubordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2017-2042

   0.00%-2.67%    227,231    617,358 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2017-2044

   0.81%-5.40%    197,806    216,213 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Chinese yuan, due 2017-2021

   2.40%-6.15%    —      24,348 

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Thai baht, due 2018-2021

   1.85%-4.03%    —      12,724 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2017-2042

   0.04%-1.92%    267,598    431,141 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2017-2027

   1.00%-3.86%    21,610    498,860 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in euros, due 2020

   1.00%    52,403    47,952 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in Great Britain pound, due 2042-2043

   1.51%-8.49%    24,627    20,190 

Other fixed or floating rate borrowing, due 2017-2043

   0.58%-11.79%    10,873    30,728 

Subordinated

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2021

   1.35%    —      5,200 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2025

   1.95%    —      4,000 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other subsidiaries

     1,223,810    2,815,141 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities associated with securitization transactions:

      

Fixed rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2021-2049

   0.09%-2.70%    1,152,826    1,077,539 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in Japanese yen, due 2017-2027

   0.16%-1.66%    47,533    85,421 

Floating rate borrowing, payable in United States dollars, due 2019-2020

   1.86%-3.01%    4,363    6,781 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities associated with securitization transactions

     1,204,722    1,169,741 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Lease obligations

   —      9,166    106,924 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total borrowings

     ¥10,652,481   ¥12,245,943 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The interest rates shown in the above table are the contractual rates in effect at March 31, 2018 and 2017, and thus do not represent the actual effective interest rates. Maturity information for certain subordinated borrowings is based on the date of callable options.

19DEBT SECURITIES IN ISSUE

Debt securities in issue at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

    At March 31,      At March 31, 
  Interest rate 2018   2017   Interest rate  2021   2020 
    (In millions)      (In millions) 

SMFG:

           

Bonds:

           

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due2021-2048

   1.99%-4.30%  ¥2,583,513   ¥1,639,109 

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2021-2051

  0.00%-4.31%  ¥4,793,038   ¥4,357,548 

Bonds, payable in euros,

due 2022-2033

   0.12%-1.72%  509,987    239,081   0.00%-1.72%   891,662    761,597 

Bonds, payable in Australian dollars,

due 2022-2028

   3.07%-4.13%  179,367    93,691   1.22%-4.13%   252,135    199,201 

Bonds, payable in Hong Kong dollars,

due 2028

  3.54%   4,493    4,581 

Subordinated bonds:

           

Subordinated bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2024-2030

   0.30%-1.33%  757,999    653,778   0.30%-1.33%   605,472    724,332 

Subordinated bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2024

   4.44%  185,426    195,697 

Subordinated bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2024-2030

  2.14%-4.44%   342,931    262,856 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total SMFG

   4,216,292    2,821,356      6,889,731    6,310,115 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

SMBC:

           

Commercial paper

   (0.50%)-2.26%  1,521,437    1,389,908   (0.60%)-1.90%   978,109    642,377 

Bonds:

           

Bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2017-2019

   0.25%-0.33%  99,000    156,182 

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2017-2045

   1.21%-4.30%  2,072,295    2,404,015 

Bonds, payable in euros,

due 2017-2023

   0.00%-2.75%  260,236    417,767 

Bonds, payable in Australian dollars,

due 2017-2025

   2.97%-4.13%  63,572    77,270 

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2020-2045

  2.00%-4.30%   576,458    859,470 

Bonds, payable in euros,

due 2020-2023

  0.09%-2.75%   162,788    411,895 

Bonds, payable in Australian dollars,

due 2020-2025

  2.90%-3.67%   11,408    20,227 

Bonds, payable in Hong Kong dollars,

due 2020-2025

   2.09%-2.92%  32,009    34,136   2.09%-2.92%   23,722    33,908 

Bonds, payable in Thai baht,

due 2019-2020

   2.00%-2.09%  25,575    11,410 

Bonds, payable in Thai baht,

due 2020-2021

  2.00%-2.66%   7,080    19,980 

Bonds, payable in Great Britain pound,

due 2020

  0.82%   —      33,338 

Bonds, payable in Chinese yuan,

due 2023

  3.20%   16,828    —   

Subordinated bonds:

        

Subordinated bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2017-2026

   0.87%-2.80%  385,522    565,599 

Subordinated bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2020-2026

  1.43%-2.21%   139,935    289,899 

Subordinated bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2022

   4.85%  158,912    167,724   4.85%   169,024    168,386 

Subordinated bonds, payable in euros,

due 2020

   4.00%  97,648    89,227   4.00%   —      89,442 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total SMBC

   4,716,206    5,313,238      2,085,352    2,568,922 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Other subsidiaries:

           

Commercial paper

   0.00%-2.42%  946,208    2,128,438   (0.00%)-2.85%   1,347,181    1,094,325 

Bonds:

           

Bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2017-2048

   0.01%-21.00%  616,267    788,633 

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2017-2037

   0.01%-8.00%  24,599    68,616 

Bonds, payable in Indonesian rupiah,

due 2018

   9.85%  19,081    8,688 

Bonds, payable in Australian dollars,

due 2019-2031

   0.01%-3.00%  1,896    1,654 

Bonds, payable in Turkish lira,

due 2019-2023

   0.01%-9.00%  3,568    —   

Bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2020-2050

  0.01%-20.00%   252,354    483,329 

Bonds, payable in United States dollars,

due 2020-2037

  0.01%-11.40%   197,654    206,552 

Bonds, payable in euros,

due 2023-2029

  0.01%-0.55%   422,121    268,512 

Bonds, payable in Indonesian rupiah,

due 2020-2024

  7.50%-8.25%   7,553    21,067 

Bonds, payable in Australian dollars,

due 2020-2031

  0.01%-3.00%   1,179    1,290 

Bonds, payable in Turkish lira,

due 2020-2023

  0.01%-15.00%   2,444    4,081 

Bonds, payable in Chinese yuan,

due 2020-2021

  0.00%   3,031    6,855 

Subordinated bonds:

        

Subordinated bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2019-2028

   2.31%-4.15%  25,000    35,000 

Subordinated bonds, payable in Japanese yen,

due 2028

  4.00%-4.15%   20,000    20,000 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total other subsidiaries

   1,636,619    3,031,029      2,253,517    2,106,011 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total debt securities in issue

   ¥10,569,117   ¥11,165,623     ¥11,228,600   ¥10,985,048 
   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Interest rates represent the contractual interest rates that were applied at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and thus do not represent the actual effective interest rates.

The following table presents the movement in Subordinated bonds for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2018.2021 and 2020.

 

Subordinated
bonds
(In millions)

Balance at March 31, 2017(1)

¥1,707,025

Cash flows:

Proceeds from issuance of subordinated bonds

104,866

Redemption of subordinated bonds

(180,034

Non-cash changes:

Foreign exchange translations

(11,138

Others(2)

(10,212

Balance at March 31, 2018(1)

¥1,610,507

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

Subordinated bonds at beginning of period(1)

  ¥1,554,915  ¥1,595,327 

Cash flows:

   

Proceeds from issuance of subordinated bonds

   90,135   54,303 

Redemption of subordinated bonds

   (361,820  (113,000

Non-cash changes:

   

Foreign exchange translations

   14,201   (10,900

Others

   (20,069  29,185 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subordinated bonds at end of period(1)

  ¥1,277,362  ¥1,554,915 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

The balances are comprised of subordinated bonds issued by SMFG, SMBC and other subsidiaries.

(2)Others mainly include changes arising from losing control of SMFG’s subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

 

2021

PROVISIONS

The following table presents movements by class of provisions for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 Provision for
interest repayment
 Other provisions Total   Provision for
interest repayment
 Other provisions Total 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Balance at April 1, 2016

 ¥229,422  ¥32,979  ¥262,401 

Balance at April 1, 2019

  ¥148,409  ¥46,409  ¥194,818 

Additional provisions

 12,000  14,743  26,743    39,000  19,614  58,614 

Amounts used

 (83,528 (10,713 (94,241   (43,674 (9,577 (53,251

Unused amounts reversed

 (439 (225 (664   (29 (106 (135

Amortization of discount and effect of change in discount rate

 (122 214  92    (277 157  (120

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

  —    381  381 

Others

  —    (12 (12   —    127  127 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2017

 157,333  37,367  194,700 

Balance at March 31, 2020

   143,429  56,624  200,053 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additional provisions

 50,500  28,537  79,037    39,000  34,374  73,374 

Amounts used

 (61,961 (14,902 (76,863   (40,572 (8,418 (48,990

Unused amounts reversed

 (479 (3,247 (3,726   (559 (27 (586

Amortization of discount and effect of change in discount rate

 (142 209  67    (97 147  50 

Others

 (72 (4,876 (4,948   —    373  373 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

 ¥145,179  ¥43,088  ¥188,267 

Balance at March 31, 2021

  ¥141,201  ¥83,073  ¥224,274 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision for Interest Repayment

Japan has two laws restricting interest rates on loans. The Interest Rate Restriction Act sets the maximum interest rates on loans ranging from 15% to 20%. The Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates capped the interest rate on loans at 29.2% up to June 2010. Interest rates on loans greater than the range of15-20% but below the maximum allowable of 29.2% were called “gray zone interest,” and many consumer lending and credit card companies were charging interest in this zone.

In January 2006, judicial decisions strictly interpreted the conditions under which consumer finance companies may retain gray zone interest. As a result, claims for refunds of gray zone interest have increased, and consumer lending and credit card companies have recorded a provision for claims for refunds of gray zone interest.

In December 2006, the Government of Japan made amendments to laws regulating money lenders to implement regulatory reforms affecting the consumer finance industry. As a result, in June 2010, the maximum legal interest rates on loans were reduced to the range of15-20%, and gray zone interest was abolished.

The provision for interest repayment is calculated by estimating the future claims for the refund of gray zone interest, taking into account historical experience such as the number of customer claims for a refund, the amount of repayments and the characteristics of customers, and the length of the period during which claims are expected to be received in the future. Of these historical experiences, the number of customer claims for the refund has a significant effect on the amount of the provision, and the historical number of customer claims to the SMBC Group was 9489 thousand, 12795 thousand and 13784 thousand for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The timing of the settlement of these claims is uncertain.

The decrease in the provision for interest repayment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 was primarily due to the use of the provision during the year, which was partially offset by additional provisions as a result of the estimation of the future claims for the refund.

Other Provisions

Other provisions include asset retirement obligations and provisions for loan commitments, reimbursement of deposits, loan commitments,point programs, product warranties and litigation claims. Most of these provisions occurred in the normal course of business and none of them were individually significant at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

2122

OTHER LIABILITIES

Other liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Accrued expenses

  ¥313,226   ¥291,871   ¥320,850   ¥338,626 

Unearned income

   133,478    168,952    105,510    121,416 

Financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities

   119,170    119,913    34,227    42,515 

Due to trust account

   1,328,271    1,180,976    1,732,438    1,379,220 

Payables to brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions

   1,737,919    2,618,322    2,504,422    1,712,641 

Payables related to credit card services

   640,487    563,268    743,514    636,032 

Obligations from factoring transactions

   566,284    487,209    479,963    506,202 

Retirement benefit liabilities

   36,888    64,972    38,881    38,986 

Guarantee deposits received

   701,177    563,739    746,465    1,130,839 

Others

   1,305,840    1,401,879    2,071,232    1,694,878 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other liabilities

  ¥6,882,740   ¥7,461,101   ¥8,777,502   ¥7,601,355 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

2223

DEFERRED INCOME TAX

The changes of net deferred tax assets and liabilities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥(238,240 ¥(220,574

Deferred tax benefit (expense)

   (1,036  120,468 

Deferred tax relating to other comprehensive income:

   

Remeasurements of defined benefit plans reserve

   (22,492  (2,315

Available-for-sale financial assets reserve

   (99,383  (82,619

Exchange differences on translating foreign operations reserve

   3,137   2,545 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries and businesses

   (17,196  (6,259

Reclassification to assets held for sale(1)

   (5,540  —   

Exchange differences and others

   2,445   (49,486
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At end of period

  ¥(378,305 ¥(238,240
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The SMBC Group reclassified net deferred tax assets of ¥5,540 million allocated to Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited and its subsidiaries to assets held for sale at March 31, 2018. For additional information, refer to Note 50 “Assets and Disposal Groups Held for Sale.”
   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥36,015  ¥(230,292

Deferred tax benefit (expense)

   (43,660  151,292 

Deferred tax relating to other comprehensive income:

   

Remeasurements of defined benefit plans reserve

   (100,427  27,028 

Financial instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income reserve

   (266,255  96,170 

Own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss reserve

   1,525   —   

Exchange differences on translating foreign operations reserve

   (3,921  2,226 

Acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries and businesses

   5   (6,438

Exchange differences and others

   6,141   (3,971
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At end of period

  ¥(370,577 ¥36,015 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The deferred tax assets and liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were attributable to the following items:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
2018 2017   2021 2020 
(In millions)   (In millions) 

Deferred tax assets:

     

Loans and advances

   ¥206,928  ¥231,971   ¥389,209  ¥349,058 

Tax losses carried forward

   63,563  68,678 

Derivative financial instruments

   59,530  55,989    49,076  95,917 

Provision for interest repayment

   36,779  40,638    39,386  39,928 

Tax losses carried forward

   24,082  98,788 

Retirement benefits

   9,204  21,772    10,130  42,719 

Investment securities

   1,243  981    207  216 

Other deductible temporary differences

   152,891  161,246    127,720  121,580 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   490,657  611,385    679,291  718,096 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

      

Investment securities

   680,425  571,489    780,118  477,168 

Retirement benefits

   76,821  3,110 

Property, plant and equipment

   65,483  56,992 

Goodwill and intangible assets

   81,076  111,145    60,145  64,574 

Property, plant and equipment

   28,786  91,703 

Retirement benefits

   19,484  3,485 

Lease transactions

   10,866  16,026    7,399  8,845 

Other taxable temporary differences

   48,325  55,777    59,902  71,392 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   868,962  849,625    1,049,868  682,081 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities(1)

   ¥(378,305 ¥(238,240

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)(1)

  ¥(370,577 ¥36,015 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position if the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities, and the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on the same taxable entity.

On March 31, 2016,The Company has adopted the Government of Japan promulgated (i) an amendment to the Corporation Tax Act and (ii) the Local Tax Act. Those laws (i) reduce the Japanese national corporation tax rate by 0.5 percentage points from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2016 and additionally reduce by 0.2 percentage points from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018, and (ii) reduce the enterprise tax rate by 1.2 percentage points from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2016. As a result, the effective statutory tax rate of the Company was reduced from 32.3% to 30.9% during the two fiscal years beginning April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2018 and from 30.9% to 30.6% for the fiscal years beginning April 1, 2018. The SMBC Group measured deferred tax assets and liabilities at the rates that were expected to apply to the period when the assets are realized or the liabilities are settled.

On December 22, 2016, the Company applied to the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency for permission to adopt the consolidatedcorporate-tax system in Japan from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. Accordingly, the Company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries started to recognize the deferred tax assets based on the consolidatedcorporate-tax system at March 31, 2017.Japan. Under the consolidatedcorporate-tax system, the taxable profits or losses on a consolidated basis are calculated by aggregating those of

the parent company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries (a “tax consolidated group”), and any unused tax losses carried forward, except for certain specified consolidated tax losses carried forward, by one company can be used by another company within the tax consolidated group for Japanese national corporation tax purposes. Therefore, the deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward were recognized on a consolidated basis, but only to the extent that it is probable that future consolidated taxable profits will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward can be utilized.

On March 31, 2020, the Government of Japan promulgated an amendment to the Corporation Tax Act, which revised the consolidated corporate-tax system and shifted to the group aggregation system. Under the group aggregation system, each company in the tax group will individually file its own tax returns while maintaining certain system to aggregate profits and losses within the group company. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2022 and there are not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

The deferred tax assets of the Company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, which adopted the consolidatedcorporate-tax system, consisted mainly of those for loans and advances. The deferred tax assets for loans and advances were generally related to the accumulated losses from the impairment of these assets which would be deductible for tax purposes in future periods. The Company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries consider that most of the deductible temporary differences will be able to be used based mainly on future taxable profits on a consolidated basis. The future taxable profits are estimated based on forecasted results of operations, which reflect historical financial performance and the business plans that management believes to be prudent and feasible. In the Company’s other subsidiaries, deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. No deferred tax assets were recognized in certain subsidiaries of the Company’s subsidiariesCompany for the deductible temporary differences estimated not to be realized, or for the tax losses carried forward projected to expire due to the uncertainty of sufficient future taxable profit.

The following table shows the amounts of deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward by expiration date at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 for which no deferred tax assets were recognized.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Deductible temporary differences

  ¥445,649   ¥436,481 

Tax losses carried forward which will expire in 1 year

   224,298    112,010 

                                                                            2 years

   209,109    251,300 

                                                                            3 years

   252,812    219,834 

                                                                            4 years

   70,222    259,636 

                                                                            5 years

   140,879    78,055 

                                                                            6 years

   59,791    168,288 

                                                                            7 years

   44,575    75,171 

                                                                            8 years

   16,279    59,230 

                                                                            9 years and thereafter

   59,734    19,390 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward(1)

   ¥1,523,348   ¥1,679,395 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Deductible temporary differences

  ¥229,111   ¥232,242 

Tax losses carried forward which will expire in 1 year

   56,745    220,969 

                                                                            2 years

   49,388    63,570 

                                                                            3 years

   37,702    49,388 

                                                                            4 years

   23,082    37,702 

                                                                            5 years

   16,054    23,082 

                                                                            6 years

   60,252    13,120 

                                                                            7 years

   —      60,027 

                                                                            8 years

   137,202    —   

                                                                            9 years

   46,457    137,046 

                                                                            10 years and thereafter

   47,129    54,174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward(1)

  ¥703,122   ¥891,320 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Under the consolidatedcorporate-tax system, the Company and its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries recognized deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward on a consolidated basis for Japanese national corporation tax purposes and on a stand-alone basis for Japanese local corporation tax purposes. There are deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward on which deferred tax assets are recognized for Japanese national corporation tax purposes, but on which no deferred tax assets are recognized for Japanese local corporation tax purposes. These deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward amounted to ¥421,319¥216,294 million and ¥503,511¥229,883 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

In addition to the above table, the SMBC Group does not recognize deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures where the Company has no intention to reverse these differences in the foreseeable future. The amount of those deductible temporary differences was ¥818¥1,041 billion and ¥810¥1,471 billion at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

At March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the amount of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures for which deferred tax liabilities had not been recognized was ¥2,041¥2,787 billion and ¥1,352¥1,777 billion, respectively. The Company can control the timing of reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not be reversed in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax benefit and expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 was attributable to the following temporary differences and tax losses carried forward:

 

  For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Derivative financial instruments

  ¥(48,773 ¥47,115 

Investment securities

  ¥(34,881 ¥26,999    (36,714 720 

Derivative financial instruments

   9,296  39,101 

Loans and advances

   34,953  65,549 

Property, plant and equipment

   (11,218 556 

Retirement benefits

   (5,881 5,131 

Goodwill and intangible assets

   7,809  2,201    4,428  13,552 

Loans and advances

   6,092  (10,496

Tax losses carried forward

   (2,491 24,769 

Lease transactions

   5,223  2,389    1,171  1,373 

Provision for interest repayment

   (3,840 28,186    (541 2,083 

Tax losses carried forward

   (3,448 66,378 

Retirement benefits

   (2,604 3,139 

Property, plant and equipment

   (1,137 (45,285

Other temporary differences—net

   16,454  7,856    21,406  (9,556
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax benefit (expense)

  ¥(1,036 ¥120,468   ¥(43,660 ¥151,292 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

2324

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Defined Benefit Plans

SMBC and some of the Company’s other subsidiaries have various defined benefit plans such as defined benefit pension plans andlump-sum severance indemnity plans, which define the amount of benefits that an employee will receive on or after retirement, usually based on one or more factors, such as age, years of service, compensation, classes and earned points based on service.

SMBC’s defined benefit plans account for the vast majority of the defined benefit obligations and plan assets in the SMBC Group. SMBC has a corporate defined benefit pension plan and alump-sum severance indemnity plan.

Defined benefit pension plans

SMBC’s corporate defined benefit pension plan is a funded defined benefit pension plan, which is regulated by the Corporate Defined Benefit Pension Plan Law, one of the Japanese pension laws. Benefits are paid in exchange for services rendered by employees who worked for more than a specified period considering their years of service and the degree of their contribution to SMBC.

SMBC’s pension fund is a special entity established in accordance with the pension laws, and SMBC has an obligation to make contributions to it. It has a board of directors which consists of an equal number of members elected from both the management and employees of SMBC. These board members have a fiduciary duty to administer and manage the pension fund.

The objective of SMBC’s pension fund is to earn a return over the long term which is sufficient to pay future benefits to participants of the corporate defined benefit pension plan, including pension benefit plans,lump-sum indemnity plans for bereaved families, and other lump sum indemnity plans. To achieve this, SMBC’s pension fund annually sets investment guidelines including asset allocation composed of equities, bonds and other appropriate financial assets according to the funding status. Investment decisions for its assets are made in accordance with these guidelines.

The Corporate Defined Benefit Pension Plan Law requires a pension fund to review the assumptions and remeasure the required contribution at least every fifth fiscal year, in order to ensure that it maintains sufficient assets for future benefit payments. On the other hand, the present value of the defined benefit obligation is calculated annually based on actuarial valuations that are dependent upon a number of assumptions, including discount rates, mortality rates and future salary (benefit) increases, in accordance with IAS 19 “Employee Benefits.” Other types of defined benefit pension plans operated by the SMBC Group are generally established and operated in the same manner as described above.

Lump-sum severance indemnity plans

SMBC and some of the Company’s other subsidiaries havelump-sum severance indemnity plans under which their employees are provided withlump-sum cash payments upon leaving the company. While funding of these plans is not required under Japanese pension laws, some of these plans are funded with assets held by retirement benefit trusts.

SMBC and a number of the Company’s other subsidiaries in Japan established retirement benefit trusts and contributed some of their marketable securities to these trusts in order to isolate these assets for retirement benefits by entering into contracts with trust banks. Retirement benefit trusts are voluntary funds that are used either to contribute assets to the pension funds or to directly settle retirement benefits. Among the SMBC Group, retirement benefit trusts are set up for the defined benefit pension plans, as well as for thelump-sum severance indemnity plans.

The assets belonging to the retirement benefit trusts are available to be used only to pay or fund retirement benefits, and practically held by an entity that is legally separated from the SMBC Group. Therefore, they are not available to the SMBC Group’s creditors even in bankruptcy and cannot be returned to the SMBC Group, unless either the remaining assets are sufficient to meet all the related obligations or the entities (funds) reimburse to the SMBC Group the retirement benefits which are already paid by the SMBC Group. Therefore, these assets are accounted for as plan assets.

The following tables provide detailed information for the defined benefit plans.

The amounts of the retirement benefit liabilities and the retirement benefit assets recognized in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were determined as follows:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Present value of unfunded obligations

  ¥(30,082 ¥(52,494  ¥(32,872 ¥(32,696

Present value of funded obligations

   (1,143,589 (1,187,290   (1,114,185 (1,155,401

Fair value of plan assets

   1,453,238  1,432,556    1,627,110  1,318,073 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net retirement benefit assets (liabilities)

  ¥279,567  ¥192,772   ¥480,053  ¥129,976 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Of which retirement benefit liabilities included in “Other liabilities”

  ¥(36,888 ¥(64,972  ¥(38,881 ¥(38,986

Of which retirement benefit assets included in “Other assets”

  ¥316,455  ¥257,744   ¥518,934  ¥168,962 

The movements in the defined benefit obligations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥1,239,784  ¥1,177,090   ¥1,188,097  ¥1,188,183 

Current service cost

   40,387  40,030    32,099  37,775 

Interest cost

   8,637  6,970    6,352  6,826 

Actuarial losses—demographic assumptions

   15,485   77,112(1) 

Actuarial losses (gains)—financial assumptions

   5,896  (17,385

Actuarial losses (gains)—demographic assumptions

   1,510  8,089 

Actuarial losses—financial assumptions

   (6,348 757 

Actuarial losses—experience

   2,519  3,980    2,630  2,592 

Benefits paid

   (44,433 (42,387   (41,933 (43,636

Lump-sum payments

   (24,109 (11,365   (12,463 (12,443

Past service cost(1)

   (44 (3   (28,023  —   

Acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses

   —    7,096    46  1,252 

Settlements

   —    (621

Others(2)

   (70,451)  (733

Others

   5,090  (1,298
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

At end of period

  ¥1,173,671  ¥1,239,784   ¥1,147,057  ¥1,188,097 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Includes an increase due to the assumption refinement of estimate on mortality rates.
(2)Others mainly include the exclusion of the defined benefit obligations related to KUBC and The Minato Bank, both of which had been the Company’s subsidiaries but became its equity-method associates, and the exclusion of the defined benefit obligations related to SMFL which were reclassified as assets held for sale during

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021, SMBC made an amendment to its terms of defined benefit pension plans. Primarily as a result of the amendment, the defined benefit obligation decreased by ¥28,023 million and a corresponding past service cost was recognized as profit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021.

The movements in the fair value of plan assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥1,432,556  ¥1,354,202 

Interest income

   10,090   8,123 

Return on plan assets excluding interest income

   97,433   71,841 

Contributions by employer

   19,208   44,535 

Benefits paid

   (44,433  (42,387

Settlements

   —     (696

Others(1)

   (61,616  (3,062
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At end of period

  ¥1,453,238  ¥1,432,556 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Others mainly include the exclusion of the fair value of plan assets related to KUBC and The Minato Bank, both of which had been the Company’s subsidiaries but became its equity-method associates, and the exclusion of the fair value of plan assets related to SMFL which were reclassified as assets held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥1,318,073  ¥1,420,639 

Interest income

   7,767   8,080 

Return on plan assets excluding interest income

   325,474   (77,512

Contributions by employer

   11,752   13,145 

Benefits paid

   (41,933  (43,636

Others

   5,977   (2,643
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At end of period

  ¥1,627,110  ¥1,318,073 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The amounts recognized in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statementstatements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

 For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
 2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Current service cost

 ¥40,387  ¥40,030  ¥35,032   ¥32,099  ¥37,775  ¥38,540 

Net interest cost

 (1,453 (1,153 (3,553   (1,415 (1,254 (1,797

Past service cost

 (44 (3 (32   (28,023  —    108 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥38,890  ¥38,874  ¥31,447   ¥2,661  ¥36,521  ¥36,851 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The plan assets at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were composed as follows:

 

 At March 31,  At March 31, 
 2018 2017  2021 2020 
 Quoted in
active
markets
 Other Total Quoted in
active
markets
 Other Total  Quoted in
active markets
 Other Total Quoted in
active markets
 Other Total 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Plan assets retained in the pension funds:

            

Equity instruments

 ¥286,542  ¥148,439  ¥434,981  ¥269,706  ¥135,884  ¥405,590  ¥248,064  ¥157,910  ¥405,974  ¥184,621  ¥138,692  ¥323,313 

Debt instruments

 36,290  205,320  241,610  107,075  224,509  331,584  14,552  218,610  233,162  21,326  174,030  195,356 

General account of life insurance companies

 356  45,089  45,445  758  66,892  67,650  117  40,216  40,333  124  39,697  39,821 

Other investments and short-term assets

 45,252  170,476  215,728  21,970  105,490  127,460  48,178  295,104  343,282  47,496  243,834  291,330 

Plan assets retained in the retirement benefit trusts:

            

Japanese equity instruments

 468,319  1,542  469,861  456,747  1,400  458,147 

Equity instruments

 530,485  2,211  532,696  416,923  1,470  418,393 

Other short-term assets

 36,340  9,273  45,613  32,276  9,849  42,125  63,324  8,339  71,663  40,254  9,606  49,860 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥873,099  ¥580,139  ¥1,453,238  ¥888,532  ¥544,024  ¥1,432,556  ¥904,720  ¥722,390  ¥1,627,110  ¥710,744  ¥607,329  ¥1,318,073 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The assets in the pension funds included common stocks issued by the SMBC Group at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The amounts of these stocks were not significant.

The assets in retirement benefit trusts were primarily composed of Japanese equity instruments. Most of the plan assets held by the SMBC Group are invested in Japanese equity and debt instruments. Accordingly, the SMBC Group may be exposed to market risk arising from the domestic markets.

The SMBC Group retained the voting rights of some of these equity instruments with fair values of ¥457,217¥515,890 million and ¥418,221¥406,305 million (31.5%(31.7% and 29.2%30.8% of the total fair values of plan assets) at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

The principal actuarial assumptions used at March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 

Discount rates

   0.7  0.7  0.6
   At March 31, 
   2021  2020  2019 

Discount rates

   0.6  0.5  0.5

Discount rates are weighted on the basis of the defined benefit obligations.

The assumptions for future mortality are based on the official mortality table generally used for actuarial assumptions in Japan. Under the mortality table, used at March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, theThe current average remaining life expectancy of an individual retiring at age 60 was 24 years for males and 29 years for females under the mortality table used at March 31, 2021, and 23 years for males and 28 years for females.females under the mortality table used at March 31, 2020 and 2019.

The sensitivity analyses of the effect of changes in key assumptions on the defined benefit obligations at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  Increase/(decrease) Increase/(decrease)   Increase/(decrease) Increase/(decrease) 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Discount rates:

      

Increase by 50 bps

  ¥(73,146 ¥(71,373  ¥(65,357 ¥(75,446

Decrease by 50 bps

   83,014  80,864    73,727  85,951 

Average life expectancy at age 60:

      

Increase of one year

  ¥38,291  ¥37,166   ¥35,200  ¥40,012 

Each increase and decrease in the table above assumes that only one assumption is changed, with all other assumptions remaining unchanged. In practice, however, changes in multiple assumptions may occur in a mutually interrelated manner.

The weighted average durations of defined benefit plans for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021   2020   2019 
  (Years)   (Years) 

Lump-sum severance indemnity plans

   12.8    12.9    12.8    12.9    10.5    12.7 

Defined benefit pension plans

   18.9    18.2    17.6    18.5    17.5    18.9 

Funding Policy for Plan Assets

The pension funds review the funding status of plan assets every year. If any funding deficit is identified, a measure to cover such deficit will be implemented, for example, by increasing the amount of contributions by the employer.

Expected contribution

Expected contributions to the defined benefit plans for the fiscal year ending March 31, 20192022 are ¥21,269¥18,297 million.

Defined Contribution Plans

SomeSMBC and some of the Company’s other subsidiaries provide defined contribution plans. The amounts recognized as expenses for the defined contribution plans were ¥10,769¥10,994 million, ¥9,621¥11,139 million and ¥7,258¥10,862 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, which were included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

Employees’ Pension Insurance Plan

In Japan, the Government of Japan operates the Employees’ Pension Insurance Plan which covers most of the private entities’ employees. The amounts of contributions charged to expense for the Employees’ Pension Insurance Plan were ¥42,694¥37,692 million, ¥43,650¥37,990 million and ¥40,173¥39,232 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, which were included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

2425

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

The changes in the number of issued shares of common stock and common stock held by the Company or its subsidiaries during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 
   Outstanding   In treasury  Outstanding   In treasury  Outstanding   In treasury 

At beginning of period

   1,414,055,625    4,028,883   1,414,055,625    46,830,882   1,414,055,625    46,814,201 

Net change

   387,765    (143,915  —      (42,801,999)(1)   —      16,681 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At end of period

   1,414,443,390    3,884,968   1,414,055,625    4,028,883   1,414,055,625    46,830,882 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Includes a decrease of 42,820,864 shares through the sale of the Company’s shares held by SMBC.
  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2021  2020  2019 
  Outstanding  In treasury  Outstanding  In treasury  Outstanding  In treasury 

At beginning of period

  1,373,171,556   3,645,043   1,399,401,420   3,800,918   1,414,443,390   3,884,968 

Net change

  868,505   (32,741  (26,229,864  (155,875  (15,041,970  (84,050
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At end of period

  1,374,040,061   3,612,302   1,373,171,556   3,645,043   1,399,401,420   3,800,918 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The total number of authorized shares of common stock was 3,000 million at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 with no stated value. All issued shares are fully paid. The details of the stock options and the restricted shares outstanding are described in Note 3940 “Share-Based Payment.”

On May 14, 2018, the Company’s board of directors resolved to repurchase shares of its common stock and cancel all the repurchased shares. The resolution authorized the repurchase of up to the lesser of (i) an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of its common stock and (ii) an aggregate of ¥70 billion between May 15, 2018 and July 31, 2018. On June 19, 2018, the Company completed the repurchase, acquiring 15,368,300 shares of its common stock for ¥70 billion in aggregate. The cancellationCompany cancelled all of the repurchased shares on August 20, 2018.

On May 15, 2019, the Company’s board of directors resolved to repurchase shares of its common stock and cancel all the repurchased shares. The resolution authorized the repurchase of up to the lesser of (i) an aggregate of 32,000,000 shares is scheduledof its common stock and (ii) an aggregate of ¥100 billion between May 16, 2019 and August 30, 2019. On August 9, 2019, the Company completed the repurchase, acquiring 26,502,400 shares of its common stock for ¥100 billion in aggregate. The Company cancelled all of the repurchased shares on AugustSeptember 20, 2018.2019.

Preferred Stock

The following table shows the number of shares of preferred stock at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2017  At March 31, 2021  At March 31, 2020 
  Authorized   Issued  Authorized   Issued  Authorized   Issued  Authorized   Issued 

Type 5 preferred stock

   167,000      167,000      167,000      167,000     

Type 7 preferred stock

   167,000      167,000      167,000      167,000     

Type 8 preferred stock

   115,000      115,000      115,000      115,000     

Type 9 preferred stock

   115,000      115,000      115,000      115,000     

All the preferred stocks have no stated value. There was no movement in preferred stock during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

Capital stock, Capital surplus and Treasury stock

“Capital stock” represents share capital under the Companies Act adjusted by the amount corresponding to the preferred stock which is accounted for as a liability under IFRS. Purchases of treasury stock are recognized at cost in “Treasury stock.” Any additionalpaid-in capital, net gains or losses on the sale of treasury stock, and other changes in equity resulting from transactions with shareholders except for dividends are included in “Capital surplus.”

Restriction on the Payment of Dividends

The amount of the capital surplus and retained earnings of the Company that can be paid out as dividends is subject to restrictions under the Companies Act.Act of Japan (“Companies Act”). These amounts are calculated based on the Company’s nonconsolidated statement of financial position prepared in accordance with Japanese GAAP. Therefore, the adjustments made to prepare the IFRS consolidated financial statements have no impact on the calculation. The total amount that the Company can pay out as a dividend was ¥1,623¥2,078 billion at March 31, 2018.2021.

Other than the restriction by the Companies Act, the Company is required to maintain a risk-weighted capital ratio as per the Banking Act of Japan (“Banking Act”). The detail of the restriction is described in Note 4546 “Financial Risk Management.” Therefore, the Company would not be able to pay a dividend if the ratio were to fall below the minimum amount as a result of the payment of the dividends.

Since the Company is a holding company, its earnings rely mostly on dividend income from SMBC, and the Company’s other subsidiaries and associates. SMBC is subject to some restrictions on its dividend payment by the Companies Act and the Banking Act, similar to those applied to the Company’s.

Other Reserves

Remeasurements of defined benefit plans reserve

Remeasurements of the defined benefit plans reserve includes the accumulated actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, and return on plan assets excluding interest income.

The movements of remeasurements of the defined benefit plans reserve for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥22,774  ¥18,985  ¥120,316   ¥(2,553 ¥72,425  ¥76,102 

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   73,662  8,134  (154,273   327,681  (88,950 (40,329

Income tax (expense) benefit for changes arising during the period

   (22,492 (2,315 48,550    (100,427 27,028  12,407 

Amount attributable tonon-controlling interests

   45  (1,568 3,834    26  (29 53 

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of associates and joint ventures

   58  (462 558    1,096  (333 760 

Transfer of (gains) losses on remeasurements, net of tax to retained earnings

   2,055   —     —   

Transfer from other reserves to retained earnings

   (11,412 (12,694 23,432 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At end of period

  ¥76,102  ¥22,774  ¥18,985   ¥214,411  ¥(2,553 ¥72,425 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assetsFinancial instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income reserve

Theavailable-for-sale financial assetsinstruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) reserve includes the accumulated gains and losses ofavailable-for-sale financial assets excluding the amount debt instruments measured at FVOCI and equity instruments measured at FVOCI under IFRS 9. The accumulated gains and losses related to debt instruments measured at FVOCI are reclassified to profit or loss when the assets are derecognized or impaired. The accumulated gains and losses related to equity instruments measured at FVOCI are transferred to retained earnings when the assets are derecognized. In addition, when the decline in the fair value of an equity instrument measured at FVOCI is above the threshold to qualify for a tax deduction, the accumulated losses related to the equity instrument are transferred to retained earnings.

The movements of theavailable-for-sale financial assetsinstruments at FVOCI reserve for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥1,929,894  ¥1,756,634  ¥2,234,636   ¥1,500,013  ¥1,730,607  ¥1,718,937 

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   582,435  371,438  (551,572   996,972  (178,166 21,936 

Income tax (expense) benefit for changes arising during the period

   (184,128 (116,277 217,723    (304,515 54,206  2,982 

Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net profit, before tax

   (275,038 (109,990 (217,529   (79,711 (96,624 (6,071

Income tax benefit for reclassification adjustments

   84,745  33,658  71,876 

Income tax (expense) benefit for reclassification adjustments

   24,409  29,590  1,844 

Amount attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (15,653 (3,971 2,251    4  (2 53,769 

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of associates and joint ventures

   5  (1,598 (751   5,751  231  1,368 

Transfer from other reserves to retained earnings

   (36,668 (39,829 (64,158
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At end of period

  ¥2,122,260  ¥1,929,894  ¥1,756,634   ¥2,106,255  ¥1,500,013  ¥1,730,607 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss reserve

The own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss (“FVPL”) reserve includes the accumulated gains and losses arising from changes in fair value that is attributable to changes in own credit risk of financial liabilities designated at FVPL.

The movements of own credit on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss reserve for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 were as follows:

For the fiscal
year ended
March 31,
2021
(In millions)

At beginning of period

¥—  

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

(4,981

Income tax (expense) benefit for changes arising during the period

1,526

At end of period

¥(3,455

Exchange differences on translating foreign operations reserve

Exchange differences on translating the foreign operations reserve includes foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the net assets of foreign operations from their functional currencies to the SMBC Group’s presentation currency, Japanese yen.

The movements of exchange differences on translating the foreign operations reserve for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

At beginning of period

  ¥181,374  ¥216,336  ¥404,132   ¥28,260  ¥113,334  ¥125,987 

Gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax

   (75,409 (24,063 (219,904   86,842  (78,742 22,517 

Income tax (expense) benefit for changes arising during the period

   3,152  2,544  19,027    (3,784 2,288  343 

Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net profit, before tax

   49  (4 8    446  204  (37,247

Income tax (expense) benefit for reclassification adjustments

   (15 1  (3   (137 (62 131 

Amount attributable tonon-controlling interests

   9,014  6,102  26,687    (469 2,741  4,430 

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of associates and joint ventures

   7,822  (19,542 (13,611   2,488  (11,503 (2,827
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

At end of period

  ¥125,987  ¥181,374  ¥216,336   ¥113,646  ¥28,260  ¥113,334 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

2526NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND

EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OTHER EQUITY INSTRUMENTS HOLDERS

Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests at March 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Preferred securities issued by subsidiaries

  ¥730,153   ¥870,979 

Others

   502,827    634,022 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-controlling interests

  ¥1,232,980   ¥1,505,001 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred securities issued by subsidiaries

Preferred securities issued by subsidiaries consisted of the following:

   

Redemption at
the option of
Issuer(1)

  At March 31, 
     2018   2017 
      (In millions) 

SMFG Preferred Capital JPY 1 Limited
(non-cumulative perpetual preferred securities)

  January 2018  ¥—     ¥135,000 

SMFG Preferred Capital USD 3 Limited
(non-cumulativestep-up perpetual preferred securities)

  July 2018   143,438    151,456 

SMFG Preferred Capital GBP 2 Limited
(non-cumulativestep-up perpetual preferred securities)

  January 2029   37,215    35,023 

SMFG Preferred Capital JPY 2 Limited

      

Series A(non-cumulativestep-up perpetual preferred securities)

  January 2019   113,000    113,000 

Series B(non-cumulative perpetual preferred securities)

  July 2019   140,000    140,000 

Series E(non-cumulative perpetual preferred securities)

  July 2019   33,000    33,000 

SMFG Preferred Capital JPY 3 Limited

      

Series A(non-cumulativestep-up perpetual preferred securities)

  January 2020   99,000    99,000 

Series B(non-cumulative perpetual preferred securities)

  January 2020   164,500    164,500 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred securities issued by subsidiaries

    ¥730,153   ¥870,979 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Subject to the prior approval of the Financial Services Agency of Japan (“FSA”), preferred securities are redeemable at any dividend payment date on and after a specific month and the month shown in this column is such a specific month of each preferred security.

Others

Others represent the equity in the SMBC Group’s subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the SMBC Group. They were not considered individually material to the SMBC Group at March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Equity attributable to other equity instruments holders

Equity attributable to other equity instruments holders at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted of the following:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Perpetual subordinated bonds

  ¥599,522   ¥449,709   ¥648,536   ¥684,476 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total equity attributable to other equity instruments holders

  ¥    599,522   ¥    449,709   ¥     648,536   ¥   684,476 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

SMFG issued perpetual subordinated bonds, which are BaselIII-compliant Additional Tier 1 capital instruments and are classified as equity under IFRS.

The bonds bear a fixed rate of interest until the first call date. After the first call date, they will bear floating rate of interest unless they are redeemed. SMFG may at any time and in its sole discretion, elect to cancel any interest payment. If cancelled, interest payments arenon-cumulative and will not increase to compensate for any short-fall in interest payments in any previous year.

These bonds are undated, have no final maturity date and may be redeemed at SMFG’s option, in whole, but not in part, on the first call date or any interest payment dates thereafter subject to prior confirmation of the FSA.Financial Services Agency of Japan (“FSA”).

The principal amount of the bonds may be written down upon the occurrence of certain trigger events. For example, if the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio falls below 5.125% (“Capital Ratio Event”), the principal amount required to fully restore the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio above 5.125% will be written down.

The principal amount of the bonds which has been written down due to a Capital Ratio Event may be reinstated at SMFG’s option, subject to prior confirmation of the FSA of Japan that the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio remains at a sufficiently high level after giving effect to such reinstatement.

2627

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest income from:

          

Deposits with banks

  ¥78,217   ¥45,770   ¥40,472   ¥17,411  ¥81,592  ¥103,798 

Call loans and bills bought

   19,362    12,065    21,828    11,091  16,556  16,400 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

   40,021    29,601    22,011    14,148  52,865  38,387 

Investment securities

   102,295    87,348    84,912    126,639  178,830  152,915 

Loans and advances

   1,904,175    1,725,477    1,703,361    1,611,081  2,077,202  2,094,850 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest income

   2,144,070    1,900,261    1,872,584     1,780,370    2,407,045    2,406,350  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest expense from:

          

Deposits

   382,753    249,028    202,312    179,910  582,799  601,365 

Call money and bills sold

   8,763    5,286    5,583    1,755  10,483  14,212 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

   61,341    20,623    15,105    7,131  132,389  120,984 

Borrowings

   89,196    79,835    72,203    62,624  92,425  107,233 

Debt securities in issue

   190,774    146,937    135,172    109,205  232,473  256,035 

Premiums for deposit insurance

   35,813  36,809  35,555 

Others

   1,142    629    726    807  3,352  2,046 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest expense

   733,969    502,338    431,101    397,245  1,090,730  1,137,430 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

  ¥1,410,101   ¥1,397,923   ¥1,441,483   ¥1,383,125  ¥1,316,315  ¥1,268,920 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest income recorded on impaired financial assets was ¥18,886 million, ¥16,892 million and ¥20,545 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

2728

NET FEE AND COMMISSION INCOME

Net fee and commission income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Fee and commission income from:

          

Loans

  ¥120,998   ¥128,305   ¥121,934   ¥132,523  ¥123,472  ¥118,225 

Credit card business

   289,509    261,253    253,136    304,787  304,238  290,034 

Guarantees

   62,934    58,221    55,618    64,422  67,846  63,112 

Securities-related business

   147,016    146,655    133,019    169,251  149,837  142,870 

Deposits

   16,169    15,929    14,882    14,763  14,045  12,650 

Remittances and transfers

   140,621    138,029    133,110    138,907  141,617  139,625 

Safe deposits

   5,224    5,414    5,511    4,160  4,349  4,546 

Trust fees

   3,854    3,607    3,619    4,885  4,680  4,629 

Investment trusts

   154,419    126,590    116,057    163,522  150,349  127,762 

Agency

   16,577    16,753    16,432    8,442  9,612  11,417 

Others

   174,043    165,656    178,362    168,720  177,087  186,907 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total fee and commission income

   1,131,364    1,066,412    1,031,680     1,174,382    1,147,132    1,101,777  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fee and commission expense from:

          

Remittances and transfers

   40,214    39,419    38,358    39,417  40,601  42,150 

Guarantees

   3,750    3,434    3,071 

Others

   134,903    138,720    89,952    162,306  163,221  136,201 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total fee and commission expense

   178,867    181,573    131,381    201,723  203,822  178,351 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net fee and commission income

  ¥952,497   ¥884,839   ¥900,299   ¥972,659  ¥943,310  ¥923,426 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fee and commission income can be mainly disaggregated into credit card business, securities-related business, investment trusts, remittances and transfers and loans by types of services. Fees obtained through credit card business principally arise in the Retail Business Unit. Fees obtained through securities-related business principally arise in the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit and the Global Business Unit. Fees and commissions obtained through investment trusts principally arise in the Retail Business Unit and Head office account and others, which include the investment advisory and investment trust management businesses. Remittance and transfer fees principally arise in the Wholesale Business Unit, the Retail Business Unit and the Global Business Unit. Loan transaction fees principally arise in the Wholesale Business Unit and the Global Business Unit.

 

2829

NET TRADING INCOME

Net trading income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interest rate

  ¥128,137   ¥79,650   ¥240,763   ¥38,987  ¥149,420  ¥176,352 

Foreign exchange

   87,322    51,143    204,349    168,462  (78,541 92,835 

Equity

   48,047    39,478    18,019    34,772  59,388  46,576 

Credit

   5,735    13,063    (2,641   (4,723 2,495  3,667 

Others

   1,223    629    2,192    248  1,307  872 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net trading income

  ¥   270,464   ¥   183,963   ¥   462,682   ¥    237,746   ¥    134,069   ¥    320,302  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net trading income includes income and losses from trading assets and liabilities, and derivative financial instruments.

2930

NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS

Net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Net income (loss) from financial assets mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss:

    

Net income (loss) from debt instruments

  ¥(1,775  ¥428   ¥11,311   ¥262,396  ¥(23,557 ¥53,048 

Net income from equity instruments

   1,108    1,590    949    23,687  1,618  1,607 

Net loss from financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

   (6,071  —     —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥(667  ¥2,018   ¥12,260 

Total net income (loss) from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

  ¥    280,012   ¥     (21,939 ¥      54,655  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

3031

NET INVESTMENT INCOME

Net investment income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
(In millions)   (In millions) 

Net gain from disposal of debt instruments

  ¥4,187   ¥39,484   ¥71,641   ¥79,711  ¥96,624  ¥6,072 

Net gain from disposal of equity instruments

   281,036    142,016    175,494 

Dividend income

   138,874    123,827    128,094    74,109  79,840  87,850 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net investment income

  ¥424,097   ¥305,327   ¥375,229   ¥    153,820   ¥    176,464   ¥      93,922  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Dividend income from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income which were derecognized during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were ¥1,027 million, ¥1,555 million and ¥2,524 million, respectively.

 

3132

OTHER INCOME

Other income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016 
  (In millions) 

Income from operating leases

  ¥276,850   ¥250,460   ¥206,561 

Income related to disposal of assets leased

   322,673    152,564    155,280 

Income related to IT solution services

   29,172    37,678    33,991 

Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets

   852    937    3,714 

Reversal of impairment losses of investments in associates and joint ventures

   8,123    —      4,847 

Gains on step acquisition of subsidiaries

   —      20,344    118 

Gains on step acquisition of associates and joint ventures

   —      —      1,714 

Others

   118,185    111,842    90,048 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income

  ¥755,855   ¥573,825   ¥496,273 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2021  2020  2019 
   (In millions) 

Income from operating leases

  ¥34,426  ¥40,337  ¥235,044 

Income related to disposal of assets leased

   1,233   2,744   112,344 

Income related to IT solution services

   12,836   19,880   33,828 

Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets

   3,035   1,862   541 

Reversal of impairment losses of investments in associates and joint ventures

   9,930   —     2,402 

Gains on step acquisition of subsidiaries

   405   22,040   —   

Others

   76,358   68,768   121,507 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income

  ¥    138,223   ¥    155,631   ¥    505,666  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

3233

IMPAIRMENT CHARGES ON FINANCIAL ASSETS

Impairment charges (reversals) on financial assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
(In millions)   (In millions) 

Loans and advances(1)

  ¥126,623   ¥141,457   ¥118,750   ¥277,085  ¥249,478  ¥122,927 

Available-for-sale financial assets

   10,185    71,510    29,606 

Loan commitments

   12,729  11,011  (9,771

Financial guarantees

   (7,328 (551 6,529 

Investment securities

   —     —    1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total impairment charges on financial assets

  ¥136,808   ¥212,967   ¥148,356   ¥    282,486   ¥    259,938   ¥    119,686  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

(1)Cross-reference to provision for loan losses in the table of reconciliation of allowance for loan losses in Note 10 “Loans and Advances.”

3334

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016 
  (In millions) 

Personnel expenses

  ¥864,396   ¥833,755   ¥785,547 

Depreciation and amortization

   171,043    172,496    157,672 

Rent and lease expenses

   117,400    115,425    117,482 

Building and maintenance expenses

   11,167    10,657    13,966 

Supplies expenses

   16,902    16,694    16,628 

Communication expenses

   38,171    37,250    36,634 

Publicity and advertising expenses

   80,464    79,570    79,453 

Taxes and dues

   83,976    85,967    76,695 

Outsourcing expenses

   96,733    96,063    91,837 

Premiums for deposit insurance

   37,938    38,180    36,175 

Office equipment expenses

   54,708    49,127    47,621 

Others

   240,223    216,951    246,553 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

  ¥1,813,121   ¥1,752,135   ¥1,706,263 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2021  2020  2019 
   (In millions) 

Personnel expenses

  ¥770,769  ¥787,880  ¥803,821 

Depreciation and amortization(1)

   255,702   258,516   168,564 

Rent and lease expenses(1)

   —     —     112,660 

Building and maintenance expenses

   8,593   8,864   10,254 

Supplies expenses

   15,191   15,506   16,252 

Communication expenses

   33,454   34,213   35,030 

Publicity and advertising expenses

   89,924   73,483   63,669 

Taxes and dues

   83,554   84,364   82,792 

Outsourcing expenses

   111,737   109,100   100,495 

Office equipment expenses

   56,389   51,283   47,139 

Others

   253,802   273,177   239,137 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

  ¥ 1,679,115   ¥ 1,696,386   ¥ 1,679,813  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

On April 1, 2019, the Group adopted IFRS 16 retrospectively by adjusting the consolidated statement of financial position at the date of initial application, and has not restated comparatives as permitted by IFRS 16. IFRS 16 requires a lessee to recognize a right of use asset and its depreciation and amortization over the lease term, instead of rent and lease expenses. For additional information, refer to Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

3435

OTHER EXPENSES

Other expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 consisted of the following:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
(In millions)   (In millions) 

Cost of operating leases

  ¥144,708   ¥126,320   ¥95,440   ¥23,225  ¥26,380  ¥120,412 

Cost related to disposal of assets leased

   310,460    140,255    140,083    —     —    101,218 

Cost related to IT solution services and IT systems

   92,975    92,247    90,563    84,691  85,872  96,727 

Provision for interest repayment

   49,879    11,439    141,024    38,344  38,694  47,293 

Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets

   4,913    6,041    4,302    3,725  1,937  4,596 

Impairment losses of property, plant and equipment

   27,816    6,396    4,237    10,959  79,947  5,906 

Impairment losses of intangible assets

   35,666    74,788    1,278    42,846  28,689  66,665 

Losses on sale of investments in subsidiaries and associates

   28,250    —      24    680   —    2,677 

Impairment losses of investments in associates and joint ventures(1)

   19,851    14,941    17,306    12,537  174,782  50,679 

Losses on step acquisition of subsidiaries

   —     —    25,744 

Others

   78,247    59,332    44,706    66,872  52,505  53,740 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other expenses

  ¥   792,765   ¥   531,759   ¥   538,963   ¥    283,879   ¥    488,806   ¥    575,657  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Group recognized an impairment loss of ¥10,391 million and ¥133,122 million, respectively, on investments in associates and joint ventures, due to the decline in the stock price of its equity-method associate, The Bank of East Asia, Limited.

3536

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

The detail of income tax expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Current tax:

          

Charge for period(1)

  ¥228,342   ¥260,234   ¥247,046   ¥207,742  ¥    203,060   ¥173,683 

Deferred tax:

          

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

   66,875    12,391    130,072    48,295  (94,773 17,460 

Change in the write-down of deferred tax assets on the current fiscal year income tax expense

   (63,194   (132,859   (34,000   (4,635 (56,519 (6,837

Changes in tax rates and others(1)

   (2,645   —      29,760 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

   1,036    (120,468   125,832    43,660  (151,292 10,623 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total income tax expense

  ¥   229,378   ¥   139,766   ¥   372,878   ¥    251,402   ¥51,768  ¥    184,306  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The amount

As a result of the adoption of IFRS 9, the current income tax expense of ¥13,851, ¥12,374 million and ¥103,264 million were recognized directly in equity for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2018 mainly includes the effect of change in U.S. federal income tax rate which was changed from 36% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The amount for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 presents the effect of changes in Japanese corporation tax rates. See Note 22 “Deferred Income Tax” for further information on changes in Japanese corporation tax rates.2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The following table shows the reconciliations of the effective income tax rates for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions, except percentages)   (In millions, except percentages) 

Profit before tax

  ¥1,118,976  ¥880,352  ¥1,325,700   ¥956,478  ¥282,751  ¥831,892 

Income tax expense

   229,378  139,766  372,878    251,402  51,768  184,306 

Effective income tax rate

   20.5 15.9 28.1   26.3 18.3 22.2

Effective statutory tax rate in Japan(1)

   30.9 30.9 33.1   30.6 30.6 30.6

Effect of the change in the write-down of deferred tax assets on the current fiscal year income tax expense(2)

   (5.7%)  (15.1%)  (2.6%) 

Non-Japanese earnings

   (3.6%)  (1.9%)  (2.7%)    (1.6%)  (4.4%)  (3.0%) 

Tax impact of impairment losses of goodwill

   1.4  —     —   

Tax impact of share of post-tax profit in associates and joint ventures

   (1.4%)  (1.0%)  (0.8%)    (1.2%)  (2.6%)  (1.5%) 

Tax impact of impairment losses of goodwill

   0.8 2.6 —   

Nontaxable dividends received

   (0.8%)  (1.0%)  (0.5%)    (0.7%)  (3.3%)  (4.8%) 

Effect of the change in the write-down of deferred tax assets on the current fiscal year income tax expense

   (0.5%)  (20.0%)  (0.8%) 

Tax impact of impairment losses and reversal of impairment losses for investments in associates and joint ventures—net

   0.3 0.5 0.3   0.1 18.9 1.8

Gains on step acquisition of subsidiaries and associates and joint ventures which were not taxable

   —    (0.7%)   —      —    (2.4%)  1.0

Changes in Japanese corporation tax rates

   —     —    2.2

Others—net

   —    1.6 (0.9%)    (1.8%)  1.5 (1.1%) 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   20.5 15.9 28.1   26.3 18.3 22.2
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The effective statutory tax rate in Japan for the fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 2018 and 20172021 is the aggregate of the effective corporation tax rate of 23.4%23.2%, the effective local corporation tax rate of 1.0%2.4%, the effective inhabitant tax rate of 3.8%2.4% and the effective enterprise tax rate of 2.7%2.6%, which is payable by corporate entities on taxable profits under the tax laws in Japan. The effective local corporation tax rate and the effective inhabitant tax rate and the effective enterprise tax rate were changed from 22.5%, 3.7%1.0% and 5.9%3.8%, respectively, which were applied to the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2016.

(2)The effect for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was primarily due to the reversal of the write-down of deferred tax assets at March 31, 2017 in accordance with the application to the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency for permission to adopt the consolidatedcorporate-tax system in Japan from the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. For further information, see Note 22 “Deferred Income Tax.”2020 and 2019.

3637

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table shows the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021   2020 2019 
  (In millions, except number of shares and
per share data)
   (In millions, except number of shares and
per share data)
 

Basic:

         

Profit attributable to shareholders of the Company

  ¥759,998  ¥627,870  ¥843,920   ¥687,483   ¥200,052  ¥541,932 

Weighted average number of common stock in issue (in thousands of shares)

   1,410,442  1,369,231  1,367,229    1,370,214    1,375,118  1,397,599 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Basic earnings per share

  ¥538.84  ¥458.56  ¥617.25   ¥501.73   ¥145.48  ¥387.76 

Diluted:

         

Profit attributable to the common shareholders of the Company

  ¥759,998  ¥627,870  ¥843,920   ¥687,483   ¥200,052  ¥541,932 

Impact of dilutive potential ordinary shares issued by subsidiaries

   (10 (11 (1   —      (3 (19
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net profit used to determine diluted earnings per share

  ¥759,988  ¥627,859  ¥843,919   ¥687,483   ¥200,049  ¥541,913 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of common stock in issue (in thousands of shares)

   1,410,442  1,369,231  1,367,229    1,370,214    1,375,118  1,397,599 

Adjustments for stock options (in thousands of shares)

   1,052  1,093  928    658    802  924 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of common stock for diluted earnings per share (in thousands of shares)

   1,411,494  1,370,324  1,368,157    1,370,872    1,375,920  1,398,523 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

  ¥538.43  ¥458.18  ¥616.83   ¥501.49   ¥145.39  ¥387.49 

 

3738

TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

In the normal course of business, the SMBC Group transfers financial assets mainly through repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and securitizations. Depending on the nature of the transactions, the transfers may either result in financial assets being derecognized or continuing to be recognized on the consolidated statementstatements of financial position.

Full derecognition occurs when the SMBC Group transfers its contractual rights to receive cash flows from financial assets, or retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to another party, and transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, including credit risk, prepayment risk and interest rate risk. Derecognition does not occur when the SMBC Group retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial assets, where the contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets are transferred, or the rights are retained but obligations to pay the cash flows are assumed.

The following tables show the carrying amounts and fair values of transferred financial assets that did not qualify for derecognition and their associated financial liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017:2020:

 

   At March 31, 2018 
   Repurchase
agreements and
securities lending
transactions
   Loans and advances 
     Residential
mortgages
   Corporate
loans
   Others(1) 
   (In millions) 

Carrying amount of assets

  ¥    7,730,783   ¥  1,432,966   ¥857,690   ¥49,151 

Carrying amount of associated liabilities

   7,271,817    1,154,831    853,207    40,584 

For those liabilities that have recourse only to the transferred assets:

        

Fair value of assets

  ¥—     ¥1,615,329   ¥861,824   ¥48,254 

Fair value of associated liabilities

   —      1,207,899    853,551    40,870 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net position

  ¥—     ¥407,430   ¥8,273   ¥7,384 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2017 
   Repurchase
agreements and
securities lending
transactions
   Loans and advances 
     Residential
mortgages
   Corporate
loans
   Others 
   (In millions) 

Carrying amount of assets

  ¥5,169,540   ¥1,353,938   ¥1,063,092   ¥59,562 

Carrying amount of associated liabilities

   5,116,003    1,079,329    1,060,812    49,804 

For those liabilities that have recourse only to the transferred assets:

        

Fair value of assets

  ¥—     ¥1,535,929   ¥  1,067,234   ¥  59,169 

Fair value of associated liabilities

   —      1,138,815    1,061,389    50,271 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net position

  ¥—     ¥397,114   ¥5,845   ¥8,898 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Others include loans and advances reclassified as assets held for sale and liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale related to SMFL. For additional information, refer to Note 50 “Assets and Disposal Groups Held for Sale.”
   At March 31, 2021 
   Repurchase
agreements and
securities lending
transactions
   Loans and advances 
   Residential
mortgages
   Corporate
loans
 
   (In millions) 

Carrying amount of assets

  ¥9,837,768   ¥1,522,945   ¥849,842 

Carrying amount of associated liabilities

   8,561,981    1,207,662    788,300 

For those liabilities that have recourse only
to the transferred assets:

      

Fair value of assets

  ¥—     ¥1,720,956   ¥855,254 

Fair value of associated liabilities

   —      1,263,296    788,300 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net position

  ¥—     ¥457,660   ¥66,954 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2020 
   Repurchase
agreements and
securities lending
transactions
   Loans and advances 
   Residential
mortgages
   Corporate
loans
 
   (In millions) 

Carrying amount of assets

  ¥8,068,054   ¥1,545,664   ¥1,083,861 

Carrying amount of associated liabilities

   7,911,064    1,234,536    761,080 

For those liabilities that have recourse only
to the transferred assets:

      

Fair value of assets

  ¥—     ¥1,740,057   ¥1,088,121 

Fair value of associated liabilities

   —      1,286,803    761,128 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net position

  ¥—     ¥453,254   ¥326,993 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Repurchase Agreements and Securities Lending Transactions

The SMBC Group lends or sells securities under agreements to repurchase them at a predetermined price on a future date. Since substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the securities are retained by the SMBC Group, the securities remain on the consolidated statementstatements of financial position and their associated financial liabilities are recorded. The recourse of the counterparties to their associated financial liabilities is not limited to the underlying securities.

Loans and Advances

The SMBC Group transfers its loans and advances, including residential mortgages and corporate loans, mainly to bankruptcy-remote structured entities for securitizations whereby the structured entities issue debt securities to the SMBC Group for subordinated tranches and to investors for senior tranches. The investors have only recourse to the underlying financial assets due to their bankruptcy-remoteness. Since the SMBC Group retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, the transferred financial assets do not qualify for derecognition. The SMBC Group therefore continues to recognize these transferred financial assets as loans and advances, and recognizes their associated financial liabilities arising from issuing debt securities to investors on the consolidated statementstatements of financial position.

3839

ASSETS PLEDGED AND RECEIVED AS COLLATERAL

Assets Pledged

The carrying amounts of assets pledged as collateral at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

   At March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (In millions) 

Cash and deposits with banks(1)

  ¥32,010   ¥87,670 

Trading assets

   2,423,002    2,426,665 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   1,518,748    1,570,904 

Held-to-maturity investments

   365,450  �� 1,168,111 

Available-for-sale financial assets

   10,648,468    8,128,082 

Loans and advances(1)

   11,019,253    10,058,951 

Other assets(1)

   1,825,987    1,308,136 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥27,832,918   ¥24,748,519 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Cash and deposits with banks, loans and advances, and other assets include those at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale. For additional information, refer to Note 50 “Assets and Disposal Groups Held for Sale.”
   At March 31, 
   2021   2020 
   (In millions) 

Cash and deposits with banks

  ¥15,505   ¥90,656 

Trading assets

   1,965,059    2,020,520 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   —      303,608 

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   22,300    258,079 

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   20,477,063    13,405,374 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   4,136    3,138 

Loans and advances

   10,268,344    10,793,479 

Other assets

   2,305,749    2,359,282 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥35,058,156   ¥29,234,136 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The SMBC Group pledges assets as collateral to secure payables under repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and securitizations, borrowings or for cash settlements, margins on derivative transactions and certain other purposes. These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to standard contracts.

Loaned securities for which the borrowers have the right to sell or repledge were ¥7,731,243¥9,837,768 million and ¥5,201,373¥8,072,646 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

For the reserve funds with the Bank of Japan and other reserve deposits for foreign offices maintained by the SMBC Group, refer to Note 5 “Cash and Deposits with Banks.”

Assets Received as Collateral

Under certain transactions, including reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing, and discounting of bills, the SMBC Group is permitted to resell or repledge the collateral held in the absence of default by the owner of the collateral. These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary for standard contracts. The fair values of securities and bills accepted as collateral were ¥12,218,264¥15,701,634 million and ¥13,673,077¥16,962,246 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. As to the securities received in the reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing transactions, the SMBC Group has the obligation to return equivalent securities upon completion of the transactions. The fair value of securities sold or repledged to others was ¥8,839,133¥10,446,835 million and ¥7,787,059¥12,935,265 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

3940

SHARE-BASED PAYMENT

Stock Option Plans

SMFG had introduced compensation-type stock options to directors, corporate auditors, and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC (“SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights”), which served as an incentive for them to further contribute to the equity appreciation and achieve better corporate performance through sharing the benefits and risks of the share price performance with the shareholders. The following table provides an overview of the significant terms and conditions of the stock option plan.

 

  

Title of grantees

 

Exercise period

 

Requisite service period

 

Method of settlement

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights

 Directors, corporate auditors and executive officers of SMFG and SMBC Not exceeding 30 years from the date of allocation of stock acquisition rights(1) One year from the date of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders of SMFG to the closing of the next ordinary general meeting of shareholders of SMFG Common stock of SMFG

 

(1)

A stock acquisition rights holder can exercise the rights from the day they are relieved of their positions either as a director, a corporate auditor or an executive officer (“Start of Exercise Date”) to 20 years from the Start of Exercise Date.

The number and the weighted average exercise prices of stock options for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  Number of
options(1)
 Weighted
average
exercise price
   Number of
options(1)
 Weighted
average
exercise price
   Number of
options(1)
 Weighted
average
exercise price
   Number of
options(1)
 Weighted
average
exercise price
 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   1,180,000  ¥1    984,400  ¥1    722,500  ¥            1    899,400  ¥            1 

Granted

   —     —      201,200  1 

Exercised

   (174,700 1    (4,400 1    (87,800 1    (176,900 1 

Forfeited or expired

   (2,300 1    (1,200 1 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

   1,003,000  ¥1    1,180,000  ¥1    634,700  ¥1    722,500  ¥1 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Exercisable at end of period

   463,100  ¥1    421,900  ¥1    346,700  ¥1    390,800  ¥1 

 

(1)

Number of options is the number of SMFG’s common stock granted by the exercise of stock options.

In June 2017, SMFG and SMBC resolved to discontinue the issuance of new stock options. Thereafter, SMFG has not issued any new stock options.

The weighted average stock price at the date of exercise was ¥4,245¥2,903 and ¥4,400¥3,598 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Summarized information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 was as follows:

 

       At March 31, 
       2018   2017 
   Exercise
price
   Number of
options
   Remaining
contractual lives
in years
   Number of
options
   Remaining
contractual lives
in years
 

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights

  ¥1    1,003,000    25.3    1,180,000    26.3 

The amounts of stock options recognized as expenses were measured based on the fair value of stock options granted, which were ¥135 million and ¥581million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017,

       At March 31, 
       2021   2020 
   Exercise
price
   Number of
options
   Remaining
contractual lives
in years
   Number of
options
   Remaining
contractual lives
in years
 

SMFG Stock Acquisition Rights

  ¥1    634,700    22.4    722,500    23.4 

respectively, and included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement. The fair value of stock options was measured using Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The following table represents the fair value of stock options and the assumptions used to measure the fair value for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, there were no issuance of new stock options since SMFG and SMBC resolved to discontinue the issuance of new stock options.

For the fiscal year ended
March 31,2017

Fair value at measurement date

¥2,811

Stock price

¥3,362

Exercise price

¥1

Expected volatility(1)

32.20

Expected remaining lives (in years)(2)

4

Expected dividends per share(3)

¥150

Risk free interest rate(4)

0.17

(1)Calculated based on the actual stock prices during the 4 years August 16, 2012 to August 15, 2016 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.
(2)The average expected remaining life could not be estimated rationally due to insufficient amount of data. Therefore, it was estimated based on average remaining service life of directors of SMFG and SMBC.
(3)Expected dividends are based on the estimated dividends to be paid in next twelve months from the date of grant.
(4)Japanese government bond yield corresponding to the average expected remaining life.

Compensation Plans Utilizing Restricted Stock

OnIn July 10, 2017, the SMFG compensation committee resolved to revise the executive compensation policy and to introduce new stock compensation plans that utilize restricted stock.

The plans consist of Stock Compensation Plan I (“Plan I”), which determines remuneration primarily based on the medium-term performance, Stock Compensation Plan II (“Plan II”), which determines remuneration primarily based on the annual performance and Stock Compensation Plan III (“Plan III”), which determines remuneration primarily based on corporate title.

Plan I (medium-term performance share plan) has an evaluation period of three years, starting from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, corresponding with theSMFG’s medium-term management plan. Executives are initially allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent to the monetary amount determined based on the executive’s corporate title. After the completion of the evaluation period, the compensation committee will reviewreviews the progress of the medium-term management plan, performance of SMFG’s common stock, and results of customer satisfaction surveys and other factors, to determine the final amount to be released from transfer restrictions. In case the final amount falls below the initial amount, SMFG will retrieveretrieves all or part of the allotted shares at no cost.

Under Plan II (annual performance share plan), executives are allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent to a certain portion of the monetary amount determined based on the annual performance of SMFG and SMBC, as well as on the individual performance of the executives reviewed both from short-term andmedium-to-long-term perspectives. The remainder will beis paid to the executives as a cash bonus. Transfer restrictions on these shares are released evenly over the three-year period following the year of allotment.

Under Plan III (promotion reward plan), executives are allotted shares of restricted stock equivalent topre-determined compensation amounts per title, reflecting the increased responsibilities derived from promotions. Restrictions shall apply to the shares until the earlier of 30 years from allotment or when the executive retires from office.

The eligible executives for the plans are directors (excluding outside directors), corporate executive officers and executive officers of SMFG, and directors (excluding outside directors), and executive officers, and corporate auditors (excluding outside corporate auditors), etc. of SMBC who are designated by the SMFG compensation committee or by SMBC and residing and serving in Japan. However, membersrepresentative corporate executive officers of the SMFG audit committee and SMBC corporate auditors will only be eligible for Plan III.certain of our subsidiaries.

As part of the newexecutive compensation policy, SMFG and SMBC introduced provisions for forfeiture and claw-back of vested stock under the plans in order to restrain excessive risk-taking and foster a prudent risk culture expected of a financial institution.

The number of restricted shares for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and the fair value of restricted shares at the measurement date for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

 

For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2018

Outstanding at beginning of period

—  

Allotted

387,765

Released

—  

Forfeited

—  

Outstanding at end of period

387,765

Fair value at measurement date

¥4,372

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021  2020 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   923,425   702,203 

Allotted

   868,505   272,536 

Released

   (486,964  (51,314

Forfeited

   (38,953  —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

   1,266,013   923,425 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value at measurement date

  ¥3,015  ¥3,828 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The fair value of restricted shares is based on the market price of SMFG common stock. If any granted conditions exist, the terms and conditions upon which the shares were granted, are taken into account when estimating both the number of shares expected to vest and the fair value of the shares granted. The amount of restricted shares recognized as expenses was measured based on the fair value of the restricted shares granted, which was ¥803were ¥927 million and ¥1,260 million for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 20182021 and 2020, respectively, and included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

 

4041

DIVIDENDS PER SHARE

The dividends recognized by the SMBC GroupCompany for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

  Dividends per share   Aggregate amount   Dividends per share   Aggregate amount 
  (In yen)   (In millions)   (In yen)   (In millions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

    

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

    

Common stock

  ¥155   ¥218,596   ¥195   ¥267,144 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

    

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

    

Common stock

  ¥150   ¥205,083   ¥185   ¥255,835 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:

    

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

    

Common stock

  ¥155   ¥211,922   ¥175   ¥245,577 

The Company proposed to the shareholders the distribution of a dividend of ¥90¥95 per share of common stock totaling ¥126,950¥130,191 million in respect of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.2021. The dividend is subject to the approval at the general meeting of shareholders on June 28, 2018.29, 2021. The consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20182021 do not include this dividend.

4142

CONTINGENCY AND CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

Legal Proceedings

The SMBC Group is engaged in various legal proceedings in Japan and a number of overseas jurisdictions, involving claims by and against it, which arise in the normal course of business. The SMBC Group does not expect that the outcome of these proceedings will have a significant adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of the SMBC Group. The SMBC Group has recorded adequate provisions with respect to litigation arising out of normal business operations. The SMBC Group has not disclosed any contingent liability associated with these legal actions because it cannot reliably be estimated.

Capital Commitments

At March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the SMBC Group had ¥2,626¥8,532 million and ¥2,773,096¥48,707 million, respectively, of contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment. In addition, the SMBC Group had ¥383 million and ¥317 million of contractual commitments to acquire intangible assets, such as software at March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The SMBC Group’s management is confident that future net revenues and funding will be sufficient to cover these commitments.

Loan Commitments and Financial Guarantees and Other Credit-related Contingent Liabilities

Loan commitment contracts on overdrafts and loans are agreements to lend up to a prescribed amount to customers, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. SinceHowever, since many of these loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn down, the total amount of unused commitments does not necessarily represent an actual future cash flow requirement. Many of these loan commitments include clauses under which the SMBC Group can reject an application from customers or reduce the contract amounts in cases where economic conditions change, the SMBC Group needs to secure claims, or some other significant event occurs.

Financial Guarantees and Other Credit-related Contingent Liabilities

Financial guarantees are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payments when due in accordance with the terms of the debt instrument. Other credit-related contingent liabilities include performance bonds, which are contracts that provide compensation if another party fails to perform the contractual obligation.

The table below shows the nominal amounts of undrawn loan commitments, and financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Loan commitments

  ¥60,107,128   ¥62,357,210   ¥71,677,806   ¥62,151,698 

Financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities

   8,426,245    7,924,711    9,872,696    9,204,996 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥68,533,373   ¥70,281,921   ¥81,550,502   ¥71,356,694 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

4243

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES BY MEASUREMENT BASIS

After initial recognition, financial assets and liabilities are measured either at fair value or amortized cost, within the measurement categories as defined in IAS 39.IFRS 9. The summary of significant accounting policies in Note 2 describes how these categories of financial assets and liabilities are measured, and how income and expenses are recognized either in profit or loss, or in other comprehensive income. The following tables present the carrying amounts of the financial assets and liabilities, by category and by line item, of the consolidated statementstatements of financial position.

 

 At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
 Financial
assets and
liabilities at
fair value
through profit
or loss
 Held-to-maturity
investments
 Loans and
receivables
 Available-for-sale
financial assets
 Financial
liabilities
measured at
amortized cost
 Total  Financial assets and
liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
 Financial assets and
liabilities at amortized
cost
   Debt instruments at
fair value through
other comprehensive
income
   Equity instruments at
fair value through
other comprehensive
income
   Total 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

              

Cash and deposits with banks(1)

 ¥4,773  ¥—    ¥54,691,296  ¥—    ¥—    ¥54,696,069  ¥—    ¥73,090,816   ¥—     ¥—     ¥73,090,816 

Call loans and bills bought

  —     —    1,881,880   —     —    1,881,880   —    2,553,468    —      —      2,553,468 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  —     —    8,491,703   —     —    8,491,703   —    11,738,072    —      —      11,738,072 

Trading assets

 3,169,123   —     —     —     —    3,169,123  3,140,736   —      —      —      3,140,736 

Derivative financial instruments

 3,885,271   —     —     —     —    3,885,271  5,521,617   —      —      —      5,521,617 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 1,547,672   —     —     —     —    1,547,672  1,744,848   —      —      —      1,744,848 

Investment securities(1)

 2,588  372,459   —    20,120,028   —    20,495,075   —    72,015    26,392,635    4,586,811    31,051,461 

Loans and advances(1)

 3,169   —    85,125,901   —     —    85,129,070   —    97,714,938    —      —      97,714,938 

Other financial assets(2)(1)

  —     —    3,598,642   —     —    3,598,642   —    4,250,454    —      —      4,250,454 

Financial assets included in assets held for sale

 1,693   —    3,098,196  108,882   —    3,208,771 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥8,614,289  ¥372,459  ¥156,887,618  ¥20,228,910  ¥—    ¥186,103,276  ¥10,407,201  ¥189,419,763   ¥26,392,635   ¥4,586,811   ¥230,806,410 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Financial liabilities:

              

Deposits(1)

 ¥13,929  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥128,447,598  ¥128,461,527 

Deposits(2)

 ¥(2,004 ¥155,495,658   ¥—     ¥—     ¥155,493,654 

Call money and bills sold

  —     —     —     —    1,190,929  1,190,929   —    1,368,515    —      —      1,368,515 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  —     —     —     —    12,022,593  12,022,593   —    18,509,906    —      —      18,509,906 

Trading liabilities

 2,143,899   —     —     —     —    2,143,899  2,080,826   —      —      —      2,080,826 

Derivative financial instruments

 3,498,016   —     —     —     —    3,498,016  4,949,433   —      —      —      4,949,433 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

 239,519   —      —      —      239,519 

Borrowings(1)(2)

 1,198   —     —     —    10,651,283  10,652,481  514  19,422,841    —      —      19,423,355 

Debt securities in issue(1)(2)

 (7,635  —     —     —    10,576,752  10,569,117  9,596  11,219,004    —      —      11,228,600 

Other financial liabilities(2)(1)

  —     —     —     —    6,691,042  6,691,042  1,045  8,416,003    —      —      8,417,048 

Financial liabilities included in liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale

 5,971   —     —     —    3,371,556  3,377,527 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥5,655,378  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥172,951,753  ¥178,607,131  ¥7,278,929  ¥214,431,927   ¥—     ¥—     ¥221,710,856 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 At March 31, 2017  At March 31, 2020 
 Financial
assets and
liabilities at
fair value
through profit
or loss
 Held-to-maturity
investments
 Loans and
receivables
 Available-for-sale
financial assets
 Financial
liabilities
measured at
amortized cost
 Total  Financial assets and
liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
 Financial assets and
liabilities at amortized
cost
 Debt instruments at
fair value through other
comprehensive income
 Equity instruments at
fair value through
other comprehensive
income
 Total 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

           

Cash and deposits with banks(1)

 ¥5,511  ¥—    ¥47,324,644  ¥—    ¥—    ¥47,330,155  ¥—    ¥62,471,453  ¥—    ¥—    ¥62,471,453 

Call loans and bills bought

  —     —    1,872,209   —     —    1,872,209   —    898,256   —     —    898,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  —     —    8,924,385   —     —    8,924,385   —    13,745,996   —     —    13,745,996 

Trading assets

 3,776,671   —     —     —     —    3,776,671  2,785,016   —     —     —    2,785,016 

Derivative financial instruments

 4,063,982   —     —     —     —    4,063,982  6,279,801   —     —     —    6,279,801 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 1,599,093   —     —     —     —    1,599,093  1,478,356   —     —     —    1,478,356 

Investment securities(1)

 1,251  1,173,419   —    17,899,267   —    19,073,937   —    320,771  18,054,164  3,489,451  21,864,386 

Loans and advances(1)

 3,474   —    95,270,371   —     —    95,273,845   —    94,671,818   —     —    94,671,818 

Other financial assets(2)(1)

  —     —    3,424,591   —     —    3,424,591   —    4,229,678   —     —    4,229,678 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥9,449,982  ¥1,173,419  ¥156,816,200  ¥17,899,267  ¥—    ¥185,338,868  ¥10,543,173  ¥176,337,972  ¥18,054,164  ¥3,489,451  ¥208,424,760 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial liabilities:

           

Deposits(1)(2)

 ¥20,365  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥130,274,925  ¥130,295,290  ¥(5,041 ¥138,436,459  ¥—    ¥—    ¥138,431,418 

Call money and bills sold

  —     —     —     —    2,088,020  2,088,020   —    3,740,540   —     —    3,740,540 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  —     —     —     —    9,424,506  9,424,506   —    15,455,782   —     —    15,455,782 

Trading liabilities

 2,071,584   —     —     —     —    2,071,584  2,018,484   —     —     —    2,018,484 

Derivative financial instruments

 3,889,694   —     —     —     —    3,889,694  5,555,201   —     —     —    5,555,201 

Borrowings(1)(2)

 654   —     —     —    12,245,289  12,245,943  624  17,120,738   —     —    17,121,362 

Debt securities in issue(1)(2)

 2,232   —     —     —    11,163,391  11,165,623  (53,669 11,038,717   —     —    10,985,048 

Other financial liabilities(2)(1)

  —     —     —     —    7,201,137  7,201,137  537  7,149,714   —     —    7,150,251 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥5,984,529  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥172,397,268  ¥178,381,797  ¥7,516,136  ¥192,941,950  ¥—    ¥—    ¥200,458,086 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Other financial assets and liabilities comprise of those included in other assets and liabilities, which meet the definition of a financial asset and liability.

(2)

Embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position under IFRS 9, are disclosed in this table within the category of “Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.” Although the separated embedded derivatives may have a positive or a negative fair value, they have been presented in this table as assets or liabilities to be consistent with the line of the host contract.

(2)Other financial assets and liabilities comprise of those included in other assets and liabilities, which meet the definition of a financial asset and liability.

4344

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair values stated below represent the best estimates based on a range of methods and assumptions. In determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, the SMBC Group gives the highest priority to a quoted market price in an active market. If such prices are not available, it establishes fair value using valuation techniques. The valuation techniques, if used, make maximum use of observable inputs, and rely as little as possible on unobservable inputs.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Carried at Fair Value

Valuation Process

The SMBC Group undertakes a valuation process based on its valuation control framework, which governs internal control standards, methodologies and procedures to ensure that the fair values are determined or validated independently of the front office.

The SMBC Group uses valuation techniques commonly used by market participants to price the financial instruments and they have been demonstrated to provide reliable estimates of prices obtained in actual market transactions. The valuation techniques include the DCF method, option pricing models and reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same. Key adjustments, such as liquidity risk and credit risk adjustments are also taken into account to derive fair values.

Where valuation techniques are used to determine fair values, they are validated and reviewed. In principal subsidiaries, their risk management departments, which are independent from the business units, review significant valuation methodologies at least once a year, and recalibrate model parameters and inputs by comparing fair values derived from the valuation techniques to the external market data such as broker quotes. Where the data obtained from third-party sources such as brokers and pricing service providers are utilized in determining fair values, those departments also examine those data, taking into account the consistency among the different sources, the aging of the data and other factors. In addition, accounting departments in those principal subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring that the accounting policies and procedures to determine fair values are in compliance with relevant accounting standards.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels within a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date (Level 1);

 

inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (Level 2); and

 

significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability (Level 3).

The following tables present the carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value based on the three levels of the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
  Level 1(1)   Level 2(1)   Level 3   Total  Level 1(1) Level 2(1) Level 3 Total 
  (In millions)  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

            

Trading assets:

            

Debt instruments

  ¥2,424,460   ¥416,688   ¥—     ¥2,841,148  ¥2,121,065  ¥611,415  ¥—    ¥2,732,480 

Equity instruments

   307,942    20,033    —      327,975  403,556  4,700   —    408,256 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total trading assets

   2,732,402    436,721    —      3,169,123  2,524,621  616,115   —    3,140,736 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments:

            

Interest rate derivatives(2)

   38,760    2,033,894    —      2,072,654 

Currency derivatives(2)

   —      1,724,387    14    1,724,401 

Interest rate derivatives

 47,289  3,049,703  289  3,097,281 

Currency derivatives

 104  2,325,254  507  2,325,865 

Equity derivatives

   48,154    21,310    1,880    71,344  48,283  2,908  15,411  66,602 

Commodity derivatives

   402    6,114    —      6,516  1,043  6,267   —    7,310 

Credit derivatives

   —      7,382    4,667    12,049   —    22,702  1,857  24,559 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

   87,316    3,793,087    6,561    3,886,964  96,719  5,406,834  18,064  5,521,617 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

            

Debt instruments

   —      1,518,778    10,143    1,528,921  486,073  619,641  561,450  1,667,164 

Equity instruments

   541    153    18,057    18,751  44,836  71  32,777  77,684 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss

   541    1,518,931    28,200    1,547,672  530,909  619,712  594,227  1,744,848 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

        

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

    

Japanese government bonds

   7,685,303    —      —      7,685,303  14,293,611   —     —    14,293,611 

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

   3,246,646    —      —      3,246,646  5,564,944   —     —    5,564,944 

Other debt instruments

   700,500    2,650,103    154    3,350,757  1,007,148  5,526,932   —    6,534,080 

Equity instruments(2)

   4,307,274    797,166    844,352    5,948,792 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale financial assets

   15,939,723    3,447,269    844,506    20,231,498 

Total debt instruments

 20,865,703  5,526,932   —    26,392,635 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(3)

   —      7,942    —      7,942 

Equity instruments

 4,123,247  15,959  447,605  4,586,811 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

 24,988,950  5,542,891  447,605  30,979,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  ¥18,759,982   ¥9,203,950   ¥879,267   ¥28,843,199  ¥28,141,199  ¥12,185,552  ¥1,059,896  ¥41,386,647 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial liabilities:

            

Trading liabilities:

            

Debt instruments

  ¥1,948,602   ¥60,109   ¥—     ¥2,008,711  ¥1,951,218  ¥51,373  ¥—    ¥2,002,591 

Equity instruments

   33,174    102,014    —      135,188  59,887  18,348   —    78,235 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total trading liabilities

   1,981,776    162,123    —      2,143,899  2,011,105  69,721   —    2,080,826 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments:

            

Interest rate derivatives(2)

   30,760    1,947,673    —      1,978,433 

Currency derivatives(2)

   19    1,406,759    14    1,406,792 

Interest rate derivatives

 22,165  2,623,917  3,877  2,649,959 

Currency derivatives

 10  2,169,202  5,848  2,175,060 

Equity derivatives

   78,088    27,261    —      105,349  79,008  3,211  8,279  90,498 

Commodity derivatives

   464    4,484    —      4,948  510  4,861   —    5,371 

Credit derivatives

   —      8,043    422    8,465   —    28,454  91  28,545 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

   109,331    3,394,220    436    3,503,987  101,693  4,829,645  18,095  4,949,433 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(3)

   —      6,659    833    7,492 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  —    72,623  166,896  239,519 

Others(2)(3)

  —    8,047  1,104  9,151 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  ¥2,091,107   ¥3,563,002   ¥1,269   ¥5,655,378  ¥2,112,798  ¥4,980,036  ¥186,095  ¥7,278,929 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2020 
  Level 1(1)   Level 2(1)   Level 3 Total   Level 1(1)   Level 2(1) Level 3 Total 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Financial assets:

             

Trading assets:

             

Debt instruments

  ¥2,734,340   ¥605,588   ¥—    ¥3,339,928   ¥2,191,635   ¥354,068  ¥—    ¥2,545,703 

Equity instruments

   421,477    15,266    —    436,743    234,725    4,588   —    239,313 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total trading assets

   3,155,817    620,854    —    3,776,671    2,426,360    358,656   —    2,785,016 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments:

             

Interest rate derivatives

   27,121    2,288,114    2  2,315,237    100,558    4,009,820  1,148  4,111,526 

Currency derivatives

   —      1,666,305    22  1,666,327    —      2,032,117  11,667  2,043,784 

Equity derivatives

   35,400    23,668    1,327  60,395    45,699    20,951  24,516  91,166 

Commodity derivatives

   489    11,190    —    11,679    181    16,642   —    16,823 

Credit derivatives

   —      7,613    2,731  10,344    —      15,819  683  16,502 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

   63,010    3,996,890    4,082  4,063,982    146,438    6,095,349  38,014  6,279,801 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

             

Debt instruments

   —      1,570,904    12,053  1,582,957    209,545    682,019  562,823  1,454,387 

Equity instruments

   1,667    183    14,286  16,136    2,497    356  21,116  23,969 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss

   1,667    1,571,087    26,339  1,599,093    212,042    682,375  583,939  1,478,356 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

       

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

      

Japanese government bonds

   5,722,674    —      —    5,722,674    6,785,068    —     —    6,785,068 

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency bonds

   3,468,263    —      —    3,468,263    4,494,686    —     —    4,494,686 

Other debt instruments

   466,901    2,465,406    526  2,932,833    746,557    6,027,853   —    6,774,410 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total debt instruments

   12,026,311    6,027,853   —    18,054,164 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Equity instruments

   4,075,944    864,552    836,252  5,776,748    3,073,776    8,285  407,390  3,489,451 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale financial assets

   13,733,782    3,329,958    836,778  17,900,518 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Others(3)

   —      8,985    —    8,985 

Total investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

   15,100,087    6,036,138  407,390  21,543,615 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  ¥16,954,276   ¥9,527,774   ¥867,199  ¥27,349,249   ¥17,884,927   ¥13,172,518  ¥1,029,343  ¥32,086,788 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial liabilities:

             

Trading liabilities:

             

Debt instruments

  ¥1,979,564   ¥58,766   ¥—    ¥2,038,330   ¥1,880,605   ¥35,082  ¥—    ¥1,915,687 

Equity instruments

   18,848    14,406    —    33,254    50,773    52,024   —    102,797 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total trading liabilities

   1,998,412    73,172    —    2,071,584    1,931,378    87,106   —    2,018,484 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments:

             

Interest rate derivatives

   17,903    2,187,701    —    2,205,604    62,135    3,416,391  3,863  3,482,389 

Currency derivatives

   19    1,588,004    21  1,588,044    8    1,863,217  31,236  1,894,461 

Equity derivatives

   44,593    32,604    —    77,197    90,048    10,790  42,246  143,084 

Commodity derivatives

   513    9,978    —    10,491    389    14,326   —    14,715 

Credit derivatives

   —      8,358    —    8,358    —      19,126  1,426  20,552 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

   63,028    3,826,645    21  3,889,694    152,580    5,323,850  78,771  5,555,201 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(3)

   —      23,554    (303 23,251 

Others(2)(3)

   —      (6,534 (51,015 (57,549
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  ¥2,061,440   ¥3,923,371   ¥(282 ¥5,984,529   ¥2,083,958   ¥5,404,422  ¥27,756  ¥7,516,136 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the beginning of the period. There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

(2)Interest rate derivatives and currency derivatives classified as derivative

Derivatives embedded in financial instruments (financial assets) include thoseliabilities, except for financial liabilities designated at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale, of ¥533 million and ¥1,160 million, respectively. These derivative financial instruments are categorized within Level 2. Equity instruments which are classified asavailable-for-sale financial assets include those at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale, of which ¥56,447 million, ¥5,225 million and ¥47,210 million are categorized within Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. Interest rate derivatives and currency derivatives classified as derivative financial instruments (financial liabilities) include those at SMFL, which are reclassified as liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale, of ¥5,401 million and ¥570 million, respectively. These derivative financial instruments are categorized within Level 2. For additional information, refer to Note 50 “Assets and Disposal Groups Held for Sale.”

(3)Embedded derivativesfair value through profit or loss, are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. In this table,these tables, the embedded derivatives whose host contracts are carried at amortized cost are presented within Others, while the remaining are presented within the same category as the host contract.others. Although the separated embedded derivatives may have a positive or a negative fair value, they have been presented in this tablethese tables as assets or liabilities to be consistent with the host contract. The separated embedded derivatives are measured at fair value using the valuation techniques described in “Derivative financial instruments”instruments (including embedded derivatives)” below.

(3)

Contingent consideration liabilities arising from business combinations, which are measured at fair value using discounted cash flow models, are presented as others.

The following tables present reconciliations from the beginning to the ending balances for financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 At April 1,
2017
  Total gains (losses) Purchases  Sales  Settlement(1)  Transfers into
Level 3(2)
  Transfers out of
Level 3(2)
  At March 31,
2018
  Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included in
profit or loss related
to assets
and liabilities held at
March 31, 2018
  At April 1,
2020
  

 

Total gains (losses)

  Purchases Sales Issuances Settlement(1) Transfers
into
Level 3(2)
 Transfers
out of
Level 3(2)
 At March 31,
2021
 Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included
in profit or loss
related to assets
and liabilities held
at March 31, 2021
 
 Included in
profit or loss
 Included in
other
comprehensive
income
  Included in
profit or
loss
 Included in
other
comprehensive
income
 
 (In millions)    (In millions) 

Derivative financial instruments—net:

                     

Interest rate derivatives—net

 ¥2  ¥(45 ¥—    ¥43  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥(2,715 ¥972  ¥—    ¥9  ¥(1,361 ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥(493 ¥(3,588 ¥324 

Currency derivatives—net

 1  (1  —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (1 (19,569 15,336   —     —     —     —     —     —    (1,108 (5,341 5,573 

Equity derivatives—net

 1,327  1,106   —    474  (1,027  —     —     —    1,880  1,499  (17,730 25,619   —    5,533  (6,290  —     —     —     —    7,132  7,229 

Credit derivatives—net

 2,731  8,103  (158  —     —    (6,456 25   —  �� 4,245  8,103  (743 3,618  50   —     —     —    (1,159  —     —    1,766  3,622 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments—net

 4,061  9,163  (158 517  (1,027 (6,456 25   —    6,125  9,601  (40,757 45,545  50  5,542  (7,651  —    (1,159  —    (1,601 (31 16,748 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss:

                     

Debt instruments

 12,053  (1,731  —     —     —    (149  —    (30 10,143  (1,731 562,823  11,183  40  150,091  (69,210  —    (65,137  —    (28,340 561,450  11,623 

Equity instruments

 14,286  378   —    4,915  (648 (102  —    (772 18,057  109  21,116  (376  —    15,357  (841  —    (1,532 9  (956 32,777  (831
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 26,339  (1,353  —    4,915  (648 (251  —    (802 28,200  (1,622 583,939  10,807  40  165,448  (70,051  —    (66,669 9  (29,296 594,227  10,792 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

          

Debt instruments

 526  1,600  (13  —    (1,613 (346  —     —    154  (13

Equity instruments(3)

 836,252  (3,612 46,367  68,241  (8,480 (73,897 624  (21,143 844,352  (6,380

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

           

Equity instruments

 407,390   —    40,254  10,082  (8,889  —    (1,342 130  (20 447,605   —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale financial assets

 836,778  (2,012 46,354  68,241  (10,093 (74,243 624  (21,143 844,506  (6,393

Total investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

 407,390   —    40,254  10,082  (8,889  —    (1,342 130  (20 447,605   —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(4)—liabilities:

 303  (812  —     —     —     —    (324  —    (833 (856

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  —    947  (2,006  —     —    (237,718 71,881   —     —    (166,896 947 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(3)—liabilities:

 51,015  (55,659  —     —     —     —     —     —    3,540  (1,104 (14,848
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥867,481  ¥4,986  ¥46,196  ¥73,673  ¥(11,768 ¥(80,950 ¥325  ¥(21,945 ¥877,998  ¥730  ¥1,001,587  ¥1,640  ¥38,338  ¥181,072  ¥(86,591 ¥(237,718 ¥2,711  ¥139  ¥(27,377 ¥873,801  ¥13,639 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 At April 1,
2016
  Total gains (losses) Purchases  Sales  Settlement(1)  Transfers into
Level 3(2)
  Transfers out of
Level 3(2)
  At March 31,
2017
  Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included in
profit or loss related
to assets
and liabilities held at
March 31, 2017
  At April 1,
2019
  

 

Total gains (losses)

  Purchases Sales Issuances Settlement(1) Transfers
into
Level 3(2)
 Transfers
out of
Level 3(2)
 At March 31,
2020
 Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included
in profit or loss
related to assets
and liabilities held
at March 31, 2020
 
 Included in
profit or loss
 Included in
other
comprehensive
income
  Included
in profit or
loss
 Included in
other
comprehensive
income
 
 (In millions)    (In millions) 

Derivative financial instruments—net:

                     

Interest rate derivatives—net

 ¥—    ¥(163 ¥—    ¥165  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥2  ¥(5 ¥(3,839 ¥2,376  ¥—    ¥49  ¥(1,301 ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥(2,715 ¥996 

Currency derivatives—net

 5  (21  —     —     —     —     —    17  1  (3 (21,474 774   —    1,183  (52  —     —     —     —    (19,569 (3,530

Equity derivatives—net

 (13 931   —    356   —     —     —    53  1,327  973  (12,438 (5,135  —    6,090  (6,247  —     —     —     —    (17,730 (11,843

Credit derivatives—net

 (3,134 12,821  221   —     —    (7,177  —     —    2,731  12,820  4,995  (3,405 (89  —     —     —    (2,244  —     —    (743 (3,520
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments—net

 (3,142 13,568  221  521   —    (7,177  —    70  4,061  13,785  (32,756 (5,390 (89 7,322  (7,600  —    (2,244  —     —    (40,757 (17,897
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

                     

Debt instruments

 11,667  401   —    180   —    (195  —     —    12,053  401  578,080  23,842  (2 229,573  (175,793  —    (92,334  —    (543 562,823  24,721 

Equity instruments

 27,594  174   —    4,531  (1,430 (16,000  —    (583 14,286  (404 18,711  (1,321  —    6,761  (1,075  —    (1,410 10  (560 21,116  (1,770
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 39,261  575   —    4,711  (1,430 (16,195  —    (583 26,339  (3 596,791  22,521  (2 236,334  (176,868  —    (93,744 10  (1,103 583,939  22,951 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

          

Debt instruments

 2,022  (1,258 (30 269   —    (477  —     —    526  (1,181

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

           

Equity instruments

 789,326  (20,578 51,027  88,686  (8,488 (63,768 306  (259 836,252  (25,746 412,347   —    (9,967 9,447  (3,683  —    (718 365  (401 407,390   —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale financial assets

 791,348  (21,836 50,997  88,955  (8,488 (64,245 306  (259 836,778  (26,927

Total investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

 412,347   —    (9,967 9,447  (3,683  —    (718 365  (401 407,390   —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(4)—liabilities:

 (1,240 1,543   —     —     —     —     —     —    303  (202

Others(3)—liabilities:

 4,998  46,546   —    (341  —     —     —     —    (188 51,015  41,115 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

��

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥826,227  ¥(6,150 ¥51,218  ¥94,187  ¥(9,918 ¥(87,617 ¥306  ¥(772 ¥867,481  ¥(13,347 ¥981,380  ¥63,677  ¥(10,058 ¥252,762  ¥(188,151 ¥—    ¥(96,706 ¥375  ¥(1,692 ¥1,001,587  ¥46,169 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Settlements for equity instruments include redemption of preferred stocks and receipt of cash distributions which represent a return of investment, and reclassification fromavailable-for-saleequity instruments to investments in associates and joint ventures as a result of applying the equity method.instruments.

(2)

Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the beginning of the period. For the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, transfers out of Level 3 amounted to ¥21,945¥27,377 million and ¥1,692 million, respectively. These transfers out of Level 3 are primarily due to an increase in observability of certain private equity investments.investment funds.

(3)Equity instruments which are classified asavailable-for-sale

Derivatives embedded in financial assets include thoseliabilities, except for financial liabilities designated at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale.

(4)Embedded derivativesfair value through profit or loss, are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. In this table,these tables, the separated embedded derivatives whose host contracts are carried at amortized cost are presented within Others.others. Although the separated embedded derivatives may have a positive or a negative fair value, they have been presented in this tablethese tables as assets or liabilities to be consistent with the host contract.

The following table presents total gains or losses included in profit or loss for the Level 3 financial assets and liabilities, and changes in unrealized gains or losses included in profit or loss related to those financial assets and liabilities held at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 by line item of the consolidated income statement.statements.

 

   Total gains (losses)
included in profit or
loss for the fiscal year
ended March 31,
  Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included in
profit or loss related to
assets and

liabilities held at
March 31,
 
   2018  2017  2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Net interest income

  ¥1,273  ¥524  ¥762  ¥322 

Net trading income

   7,064   14,474   7,970   13,148 

Net income (loss) from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   (1,353  575   (1,622  (3

Net investment income

   4,399   7,394   —     —   

Impairment charges on financial assets

   (6,397  (29,117  (6,380  (26,814
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥4,986  ¥(6,150 ¥730  ¥(13,347
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Total gains (losses)
included in profit or
loss for the fiscal year
ended March 31,
   Changes in
unrealized gains
(losses) included in
profit or loss related
to assets
and liabilities held at
March 31,
 
   2021  2020   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

Net interest income

  ¥15,462  ¥8,674   ¥2,668  ¥5,620 

Net trading income (loss)

   (25,067  32,429    (259  17,545 

Net income from financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

   11,754   22,521    11,739   22,951 

Other income (expenses)

   (509  53    (509  53 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥1,640  ¥63,677   ¥13,639  ¥46,169 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The aggregate deferred day one profit yet to be recognized in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 and reconciliation of changes in the balances were as follows:

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2021  2020 
   (In millions) 

Balance at beginning of period

  ¥            6,079  ¥            5,285 

Increase due to new trades

   16,476   3,904 

Reduction due to redemption, sales or passage of time

   (4,163  (3,110
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

  ¥18,392  ¥6,079 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Group has entered into transactions where the fair value is determined using valuation techniques for which not all inputs are observable in the market. The difference between the transaction price and the fair value that would be determined at initial recognition using a valuation technique is referred to as “day one profit and loss,” which is not recognized immediately in the consolidated income statements. The table above shows the day one profit and loss balances, all of which are derived from derivative financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss. The release to profit or loss results from the realization due to redemption or sales, and the amortization of the deferred day one profit and loss with the passage of time over the life of the instruments.

Valuation Techniques

Financial instruments which are classified as trading assets and liabilities, derivative financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income andavailable-for-sale financial assetsliabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. These instruments are measured at fair value using a quoted market price, if they are traded in an active market, or, for others, using the fair value measurement techniques as discussed below.

Trading assets and trading liabilities

Debt and equity instruments traded in an active market are measured at fair value using a quoted market price in such a market and they are categorized within Level 1. If a quoted market price is not available, they are measured by using a price quoted by a third party, such as a pricing service or broker, or by reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, based on inputs such as prices obtained from brokers, observable interest rates and spreads. These financial instruments are categorized within Level 2. Debt instruments measured at fair value using the DCF method, where primary inputs are observable interest rates and credit spreads, inferred from the prevailing market rates, are also categorized within Level 2.

Derivative financial instruments (including embedded derivatives)

Listed derivatives (including interest rates, bonds, currencies, stocks and commodities) are measured at fair value using the settlement price announced by the major exchange on which transactions are traded because the settlement price in the exchange reflects the most current transaction price, and is readily and regularly available from the exchange. Listed derivatives are categorized within Level 1.

OTC derivatives(non-exchange-traded derivatives), including embedded derivatives that are separately accounted for from the host contracts, are measured at fair value using valuation techniques such as the present value of estimated future cash flows and option pricing models, generally based on observable interest rates, foreign exchange, commodities, stock prices and other factors as inputs. The valuation models for some transactions, such as yield curve spread options and equity options, use inputs which are not directly observable

in the market, including historical correlation coefficients and historical volatilities. However, asIf the impact of these unobservable inputs is insignificantsignificant to the fair value for most of thethose transactions, the SMBC Group categorizes the majority of those transactions within Level 2.3.

The credit loss protection scheme which the SMBC Group offers to Goldman Sachs (“GS”) is considered to be a credit derivative, where the underlying reference entities are the American and European corporate entities covered in the commitment line portfolio of the GS group. The fair value of this derivative is determined using an ordinary collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) pricing model, commonly used in the financial markets. The SMBC Group takes some portions of the positions in subordinated and mezzanine tranches, which covers the first and second credit losses from the portfolio. The major inputs for this derivative are credit default swap (“CDS”) spread rates, correlation ratios of CDS indices for similar portfolios, and the expected additional commitment withdrawal ratio. Although CDS spread rates and correlation ratios are observable in an active market or available from brokers, this whole scheme is categorized within Level 3 as the expected additional withdrawal ratio, which is considered to be a significant input, is not observable in the market.

In addition, the fair value of OTC derivatives incorporates both counterparty credit risk in relation to OTC derivative assets and own credit risk in relation to OTC derivative liabilities. The SMBC Group calculates the credit risk adjustments by applying the probability of default that reflects the counterparty’s or its own credit risk to the OTC derivative exposures and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of default. For the probability of default, the SMBC Group uses observable market data, where possible. The fair value of OTC derivatives also incorporates adjustments reflecting funding costs to uncollateralized components of these derivatives, based on market-observable spreads on the Group’s funding transactions. The OTC derivative exposures used are determined taking into consideration the effect of master netting agreements and collateral. As the SMBC Group manages the OTC derivatives on the basis of its net credit risk exposure, the credit risk adjustments of those OTC derivatives are measured on a portfolio basis in accordance with the exception set forth in IFRS 13.

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

The majority of instrumentsNon-trading bonds in this category are debt instruments measured at fair value, using a valuation technique based on the observable prices in the market and they are categorized within Level 2.

Some equity and debt instruments in this category are hybrid instruments which have both equity and debt features. These include preferred stocks which are measured at fair value using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model, if they are indexed to the market prices in a stock exchange. The valuation model uses the historical volatility of the listed stocks as an input, which are not observable in the market, resulting in these instruments being categorized within Level 3. Other types of preferred stocks and othernon-hybrid equity instruments are evaluated using valuation techniques for unlisted stocks, which are normally used for private equity investments. The SMBC Group calculates the fair values of these instruments based on the market approach using market multiples or others in which significant unobservable inputs are used. These instruments are categorized within Level 3.

Available-for-sale financial assets

Debt instruments are measured at fair value using a quoted market price and categorized within Level 1 if they are traded in an active market. Debt instruments are categorized within Level 2 if If they are measured at fair value using a price quoted by a third party, such as a pricing service or broker, or by reference to the current fair value of another bond that is substantially the samevaluation technique based mainly on significant unobservable inputs such as prices obtained from brokers, observable interest rates and spreads. Some debt instrumentsforeign exchange volatility, they are measured at fair value using the DCF method in which significant unobservable inputs are used, and categorized within Level 3.

As for equity instruments, listed stocks are measured at fair value based on the market price at a stock exchange and categorized within Level 1 if they are traded in an active market. Unlisted common and preferred stocks in this category are measured at fair value using valuation techniques, similar to those described in “Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” above. Publicly traded stocks, investment trusts and funds are measured at fair value using the market price and are categorized within Level 1 if they are traded in an active market. Instruments whose prices are not available in the market, such as privately offered investment trusts, are measured at fair value based on the unit price, which is usually regarded as an exit price, obtained from the fund administrator or investment management firm. In such a case, these investment trusts and funds are categorized within Level 2. Other investment funds included in financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, such as private equity funds and real estate investment funds, are generally measured at fair value based on net asset value, which includes significant unobservable inputs. These funds are categorized within Level 3.

Certain loans and advances are measured at fair value using discounted cash flow models taking into account certain factors including counterparties’ credit ratings, pledged collateral and market interest rates, which include significant unobservable inputs, and are categorized within Level 3.

Some equity and debt instruments in this category are hybrid instruments which have both equity and debt features. These include preferred stocks which are measured at fair value using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model, if they are indexed to the market prices in a stock exchange. The valuation model uses the historical volatility of the listed stocks as an input, which are not observable in the market, resulting in these instruments being categorized within Level 3. Other types of preferred stocks and other non-hybrid equity

instruments are evaluated using valuation techniques for unlisted stocks, which are normally used for private equity investments. The Group calculates the fair values of these instruments based on the market approach using market multiples or others in which significant unobservable inputs are used. These instruments are categorized within Level 3.

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

Debt instruments are measured at fair value using a quoted market price and categorized within Level 1 if they are traded in an active market. Debt instruments are categorized within Level 2 if they are measured at fair value using a price quoted by a third party, such as a pricing service or broker, or by reference to the current fair value of another bond that is substantially the same based on inputs such as prices obtained from brokers, observable interest rates and spreads.

As for equity instruments, listed stocks are measured at fair value based on the market price at a stock exchange and categorized within Level 1 if they are traded in an active market. Unlisted common and preferred stocks in this category are measured at fair value based on the market approach using market multiples or others in which significant unobservable inputs are used. These instruments are categorized within Level 3.

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

Certain financial liabilities containing embedded derivatives are measured at fair value using valuation techniques. The host contracts of those liabilities are measured at fair value based on the present values of the contractual cash flows for expected remaining maturities, using the relevant credit-adjusted rates based on observable market data on the Group’s funding transactions. The embedded derivatives, which forms part of the contractual cash flows, are measured at fair value by using the same procedures as described in “Derivative financial instruments (including embedded derivatives).” Those financial liabilities are measured at fair value by combining the fair values of the host contracts and embedded derivatives. The valuation techniques for most of those liabilities use inputs which are not directly observable in the market, including historical correlation coefficients and historical volatilities. If the impact of these unobservable inputs is significant to the fair value for those liabilities, the Group categorizes those liabilities within Level 3.

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement for Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 At March 31, 2018 At March 31, 2021
 Fair value 

Valuation technique(s)(1)

 

Significant unobservable inputs(1)

 

Range of inputs(1)

 Assets Liabilities 

Valuation technique(s)(1)

 

Significant unobservable inputs(1)

 

Range of
inputs(1)

 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

    

Derivative financial instruments:

         

Interest rate derivatives

 ¥289  ¥3,877  Option model Interest rate to interest rate correlation 15%-98%
    Quanto correlation 8%-30%

Currency derivatives

 ¥14  Option model Foreign exchange volatility 10%-14% 507  5,848  Option model Interest rate to interest rate correlation 27%-98%
    Quanto correlation 7%-48%
    Foreign exchange volatility 7%-31%

Equity derivatives

 1,880  Option model Equity volatility 11%-52% 15,411  8,279  Option model Equity to equity correlation 36%-97%
    Quanto correlation (33)%-35%
   Equity to equity correlation 45%-94%    Equity volatility 17%-61%

Credit derivatives

 4,667  CDO pricing model Additional withdrawal ratio 48% 1,857  91  CDO pricing model Additional withdrawal ratio 45%
   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90%   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90%

Financial assets at fair value
through profit or loss:

         

Debt instruments

 10,143  Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 12%-25% 561,450     Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 26%-41%
   Option model Foreign exchange volatility 9%-32%
   DCF model Probability of default rate 0%-12%
     Loss given default rate 10%-100%
   Net asset value(2)  

Equity instruments

 32,777     DCF model Probability of default rate 0%-2%
    Loss given default rate 90%
   See note (3) below  

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

     

Equity instruments

 18,057  Market multiples Price/Earnings multiple 8.3x-19.5x 447,605     Market multiples Price/Earnings multiple 9.4x-63.6x
   EV/EBITDA multiple 8.7x    Price/Book value multiple 0.2x-2.9x
   Liquidity discount 0%-20%    EV/EBITDA multiple 3.1x-14.8x
   See note (2) below —   —      Liquidity discount 20%

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Debt instruments

 154  DCF method Discount margin 8%

Equity instruments(3)

 844,352  Market multiples Price/Book value multiple 0.3x-2.4x
     See note (3) below  

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

    166,896  Option model Equity to equity correlation 36%-93%
    Interest rate to interest rate correlation 27%-98%
    Quanto correlation (33)%-48%
    Equity volatility 17%-50%
   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-30%

Others(4)

    1,104  Option model Equity to equity correlation 48%-97%
   Price/Earnings multiple 11.7x-31.4x    Interest rate to interest rate correlation 15%-98%
   EV/EBITDA multiple 5.4x-16.8x    Quanto correlation (27)%-48%
   Liquidity discount 20%    Equity volatility 17%-53%
   Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 42%-51%    Foreign exchange volatility 9%-32%
   Net asset value(4) —   —     Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90%
   See note (2) below —   —  

Financial liabilities:

    

Derivative financial instruments:

    

Currency derivatives

 ¥14  Option model Foreign exchange volatility 10%-14%

Credit derivatives

 422  Credit Default model Quanto correlation 20%-30%

Others(5)

 833  Option model Equity volatility 23%-38%
   Equity to equity correlation 45%-94%
   Interest rate to interest rate correlation 31%-100%
   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90%

 At March 31, 2017 At March 31, 2020 
 Fair value 

Valuation technique(s)(1)

 

Significant unobservable inputs(1)

 

Range of inputs(1)

 Assets Liabilities 

Valuation technique(s)(1)

 

Significant unobservable inputs(1)

 Range of
inputs(1)
 
 (In millions)  (In millions)   

Financial assets:

    

Derivative financial instruments:

         

Interest rate derivatives

 ¥2  Option model Interest rate volatility 4% ¥1,148  ¥3,863  Option model Interest rate to interest rate correlation  9%-100% 

Currency derivatives

 22  Option model Foreign exchange volatility 9%-17%  11,667   31,236  Option model Interest rate to interest rate correlation  26%-98% 
    Quanto correlation 8%-52% 
    Foreign exchange volatility 7%-26% 

Equity derivatives

 1,327  Option model Equity volatility 20%-49%  24,516   42,246  Option model Equity to equity correlation  32%-96% 
   Equity to equity correlation 44%-93%

Credit derivatives

 2,731  CDO pricing model Additional withdrawal ratio 49%

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

    

Debt instruments

 12,053  Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 16%-26%

Equity instruments

 14,286  Market multiples Price/Earnings multiple 10.3x-30.2x
   EV/EBITDA multiple 8.1x    Quanto correlation (39)%-(4)% 
   Liquidity discount 0%-20%    Equity volatility 12%-113% 
   See note (2) below —   —      Foreign exchange volatility 9%-14% 

Available-for-sale financial assets:

    

Credit derivatives

  683   1,426  CDO pricing model Additional withdrawal ratio  47% 
   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90% 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

     

Debt instruments

 526  DCF method Discount margin 9% 562,823     Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 25%-42% 
   Option model Interest rate to interest rate correlation 80%-99% 
    Foreign exchange volatility 12%-28% 
   DCF model Probability of default rate  0%-39% 
    Loss given default rate 5%-100% 
   Net asset value(2)    

Equity instruments

 21,116     See note (3) below    

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

     

Equity instruments

 836,252  Market multiples Price/Book value multiple 0.3x-2.0x 407,390     Market multiples Price/Earnings multiple 10.4x-35.4x 
   Price/Earnings multiple 8.7x-42.6x    Price/Book value multiple 0.2x-2.1x 
   EV/EBITDA multiple 5.0x-14.8x    EV/EBITDA multiple 4.7x-16.3x 
   Liquidity discount 20%    Liquidity discount 20% 
   Monte Carlo Simulation Equity volatility 20%-51%   See note (3) below    
   Net asset value(4) —   —  
   See note (2) below —   —  

Financial liabilities:

    

Derivative financial instruments:

    

Currency derivatives

 ¥21  Option model Foreign exchange volatility 9%-17%

Others(5)(4)

 (303 Option model Equity volatility 24%-64%    (51,015 Option model Equity to equity correlation 31%-96% 
   Equity to equity correlation 44%-93%    Interest rate to interest rate correlation 9%-100% 
   Interest rate to interest rate correlation 14%-100%    Quanto correlation (39)%-67% 
    Equity volatility 12%-74% 
    Foreign exchange volatility 7%-28% 
   Credit Default model Quanto correlation 15%-90% 

 

(1)

Valuation techniques and unobservable inputs for insignificant Level 3 financial assets and liabilities are excluded.

(2)

The Group has determined that the net asset value represents fair values of certain investment funds.

(3)

Fair values of certain equity instruments such as unlisted stocks are estimated on the basis of an analysis of the investee’s financial position and results, risk profile, prospects and other factors. A range of key inputs is not provided in the tablethese tables as it is not practical to do so given the nature of such valuation techniques.

(3)Equity instruments which are classified asavailable-for-sale financial assets include those at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale.

(4)The SMBC Group has determined that the net asset

Derivatives embedded in financial liabilities, except for financial liabilities designated at fair value represents fair values of certain investment funds.

(5)Embedded derivativesthrough profit or loss, are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. In this table,these tables, the separated embedded derivatives whose host contracts are carried at amortized cost are presented within Others.others. Although the separated embedded derivatives may have a positive or a negative fair value, they have been presented in this tablethese tables as assets or liabilities to be consistent with the host contract.

Correlation

Correlation represents a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables, which is expressed as a number between plus and minus one. A positive correlation indicates that two variables move in the same direction while a negative correlation indicates that they move in opposite directions. Correlations could be any combination of variables such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, CDS spread and stock price movements. Thus, both same-asset correlation and cross-asset correlation are used. Interest rate correlation between two different tenors is an example of same-asset correlations while quanto correlation which is the correlation between foreign exchange rates and another variable is an example of cross-asset correlation. These

correlations are used in the valuation techniques of complex derivatives and estimated based on historical data. In general, a significant increase in the correlation in isolation would result in either a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, depending on the terms of the instruments.

Volatility

Volatility represents a measure of how much a particular instrument, parameter or index is expected to change in value over time. The volatilities used in the valuation of some type of derivative instruments with optionality refer to the potential change in price or level of the underlying interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity instruments. The volatilities of underlying listed stocks are used in the valuation of preferred stocks containing optionality. These volatilities are estimated based on historical data or information provided by third-party sources, together with other analytical techniques. In general, a significant increase in the volatility in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement.

Correlation

Correlation represents a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables, which is expressed as a number between plus and minus one. A positive correlation indicates that two variables move in the same direction while a negative correlation indicates that they move in opposite directions. Correlations could

be any combination of variables such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, CDS spread and stock price movements. Thus, both same-asset correlation and cross-asset correlation are used. Interest rate correlation between two different tenors is an example of same-asset correlations while quanto correlation which is the correlation between foreign exchange rates and another variable is an example of cross-asset correlation. These correlations are used in the valuation techniques of complex derivatives and estimated based on historical data. In general, a significant increase in the correlation in isolation would result in either a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, depending on the terms of the instruments.

Additional withdrawal ratio

Additional withdrawal ratio represents the expected additional withdrawal ratio of unfunded commitment lines in the reference portfolio (mainly revolving credit facilities for commercial paper backup) concerning the credit loss protection scheme offered to GS. The expected additional withdrawal ratio is estimated based on historical data of actual funded amounts at default for similar portfolios. In general, a significant increase in the additional withdrawal ratio in isolation would have a significant unfavorable impact (i.e., an increase in derivative liabilities or a decrease in derivative assets) on the fair value measurement.

Probability of default and loss given default rates

Probability of default rate represents the probability of default that reflects the counterparty’s credit risk while loss given default rate represents the loss expected in the event of default. Those are estimated based on historical experiences. In general, a significant increase in probability of default rate or loss given default rate in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

Price/Earnings, price/book value multiples

Price/Earnings (“P/E”) multiple represents the ratio of the equity value to the net income, while price/book value (“P/B”) multiple represents the ratio of the equity value to the book value. These multiples are estimated based on comparable listed companies. In general, a significant increase in the P/E multiple or P/B multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement.

EV/EBITDA multiple

EV/EBITDA multiple represents the ratio of the enterprise value (“EV”) to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), where the EV is the aggregate value of equity and debt minus cash and cash equivalents. The multiple is estimated based on comparable listed companies. In general, a significant increase in the EV/EBITDA multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement.

Liquidity discount

A liquidity discount is primarily applied in the valuation techniques for unlisted stocks to reflect the fact that these stocks are not actively traded. In general, a significant increase in the liquidity discount in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

Discount margin

Discount margin represents a spread used in estimating future cash flows in a DCF method to reflect the uncertainty of the cash flows that market participants would consider. In general, a significant increase in the discount margin in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

Sensitivity Analysis

The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities are measured using valuation techniques based on inputs such as prices and rates that are not observable in the market. The following tables present the impact of the valuation sensitivity, if these inputs fluctuate to the extent deemed reasonable and the volatility of such inputs has a significant impact on the fair value.

 

  At March 31, 2018 
  Total fair value
measured using
valuation
techniques
  Effect recorded in
profit or loss
  Effect recorded
directly in equity
 
   Favorable
changes
  Unfavorable
changes
  Favorable
changes
  Unfavorable
changes
 
  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

     

Derivative financial instruments:

     

Currency derivatives

 ¥14  ¥80  ¥1  ¥—    ¥—   

Equity derivatives

  1,880   271   310   —     —   

Credit derivatives

  4,667   4,515   11,765   —     —   

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

     

Debt instruments

  10,143   278   —     —     —   

Equity instruments

  18,057   361   336   —     —   

Available-for-sale financial assets:

     

Debt instruments

  154   —     —     4   2 

Equity instruments(1)

  844,352   —     —     26,835   25,290 

Financial liabilities:

     

Derivative financial instruments:

     

Currency derivatives

 ¥14  ¥2  ¥80  ¥—    ¥—   

Credit derivatives

  422   35   35   —     —   

Others(2)

  833   1,375   3,090   —     —   

  At March 31, 2017 
  Total fair value
measured using
valuation
techniques
  Effect recorded in
profit or loss
  Effect recorded
directly in equity
 
   Favorable
changes
  Unfavorable
changes
  Favorable
changes
  Unfavorable
changes
 
  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

     

Derivative financial instruments:

     

Interest rate derivatives

 ¥2  ¥7  ¥2  ¥—    ¥—   

Currency derivatives

  22   93   1   —     —   

Equity derivatives

  1,327   199   254   —     —   

Credit derivatives

  2,731   6,706   15,730   —     —   

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

     

Debt instruments

  12,053   244   26   —     —   

Equity instruments

  14,286   99   99   —     —   

Available-for-sale financial assets:

     

Debt instruments

  526   —     —     13   13 

Equity instruments

  836,252   —     —     24,785   24,137 

Financial liabilities:

     

Derivative financial instruments:

     

Currency derivatives

 ¥21  ¥2  ¥92  ¥—    ¥—   

Others(2)

  (303  1,121   1,716   —     —   
   At March 31, 2021 
   Total fair value
measured using
valuation
techniques
  Effect recorded in
profit or loss
   Effect recorded
directly in equity
 
  Favorable
changes
   Unfavorable
changes
   Favorable
changes
   Unfavorable
changes
 
   (In millions) 

Financial instruments—net:

         

Derivative financial instruments—net:

         

Interest rate derivatives—net

  ¥(3,588 ¥1   ¥1   ¥—     ¥—   

Currency derivatives—net

   (5,341  9    8    —      —   

Equity derivatives—net

   7,132   1,869    1,821    —      —   

Credit derivatives—net

   1,766   140    481    —      —   

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

         

Debt instruments

   561,450   2,495    7,060    —      —   

Equity instruments

   32,777   111    227    —      —   

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

         

Equity instruments

   447,605   —      —      13,753    12,833 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss(1)

   (166,896  879    942    —      —   

Others(1)(2)—liabilities:

   (1,104  425    395    —      —   
   At March 31, 2020 
   Total fair value
measured using
valuation
techniques
  Effect recorded in
profit or loss
   Effect recorded
directly in equity
 
  Favorable
changes
   Unfavorable
changes
   Favorable
changes
   Unfavorable
changes
 
   (In millions) 

Financial instruments—net:

         

Derivative financial instruments—net:

         

Interest rate derivatives—net

  ¥(2,715 ¥1   ¥1   ¥—     ¥—   

Currency derivatives—net

   (19,569  17    17    —      —   

Equity derivatives—net

   (17,730  493    718    —      —   

Credit derivatives—net

   (743  1,006    2,461    —      —   

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

         

Debt instruments

   562,823   2,784    4,585    —      —   

Equity instruments

   21,116   —      —      —      —   

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income:

         

Equity instruments

   407,390   —      —      8,837    8,362 

Others(1)(2)—liabilities:

   51,015   3,664    4,610    —      —   

 

(1)Equity

As part of risk management, the Group enters into transactions to offset the profit or loss of certain financial instruments, which are classifiedincluding embedded derivatives. Sensitivity of embedded derivatives related to these transactions is presented asavailable-for-sale derivative financial instruments or financial assets include those at SMFL, which are reclassified as assets held for sale.fair value through profit or loss, according to the presentation of the financial instruments arising from these transactions.

(2)Embedded derivatives

Derivatives embedded in financial liabilities, except for financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss, are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. In this table,these tables, the separated embedded derivatives whose host contracts are carried at amortized cost are presented within Others.others. Although the separated embedded derivatives may have a positive or a negative fair value, they have been presented in this tablethese tables as assets or liabilities to be consistent with the host contract.

Derivative financial instruments (including embedded derivatives)

With respect to the credit loss protection scheme offered to GS, the anticipated losses will vary significantly depending on the expected additional withdrawal ratio of unfunded commitment lines in the reference portfolio. The tables above present the estimates of the impact of changing the expected additional withdrawal ratio from an optimistic (favorable) scenario to a pessimistic (unfavorable) scenario. For the other derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives that are separately accounted for from host contracts, that use correlation or volatility in the valuation techniques, the impact resulting from using a reasonable range of those inputs is estimated where it is expected to be significant.

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss /Available-for-sale financial assets

With respect to preferred stocks convertible into listed stocks, for which historical volatilities of related listed stocks are used in the valuation techniques, the impact resulting from using a reasonable range for the volatility is statistically estimated where it is expected to be significant. With respect to unlisted stockscertain loans and advances, for which the probability of default and loss given default rates are measured at fair value based on a market approach,used in the valuation techniques, the impact of changing the market multiples withinresulting from using a reasonable range (±10%)of those inputs is estimated.estimated where it is expected to be significant. Certain investment funds classified asavailable-for-sale equity instruments are measured at fair value determined based on net asset value per share, which includes significant unobservable inputs. Since those funds are managed by value at risk (“VaR”) based on historical gain or loss data, the impact of the valuation sensitivity is estimated using aone-day VaR of the portfolio.portfolio, based on a one-sided confidence interval of 99.0%.

Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income

With respect to unlisted stocks which are measured at fair value based on a market approach, the impact of changing the market multiples within a reasonable range (±10%) is estimated.

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

Sensitivity analysis of the financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss is calculated using the same procedures as described in “Derivative financial instruments (including embedded derivatives).”

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Carried at Fair Value

The tables below present the carrying amounts and fair values by level within the fair value hierarchy, as described in “Financial Assets and Liabilities Carried at Fair Value—Fair Value Hierarchy,” of financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value on the SMBC Group’s consolidated statementstatements of financial position at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The tables below do not include the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and liabilities whose carrying amounts are reasonable approximations of fair values from this fiscal year.

 

     At March 31, 2018 
     Carrying
amount
  Fair value 
  Notes   Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
  (In millions) 

Financial assets:

      

Cash and deposits with banks

  a  ¥54,696,069  ¥54,708,231  ¥53,401,133  ¥1,307,098  ¥—   

Call loans and bills bought:

      

Call loans

  a   1,858,802   1,859,176   —     1,859,176   —   

Bills bought

  a   23,078   23,051   —     23,051   —   

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  a   8,491,703   8,491,858   —     8,491,858   —   

Investment securities:

      

Held-to-maturity  investments

  b   372,459   374,597   374,597   —     —   

Loans and advances

  a   85,129,070   87,538,646   —     258,673   87,279,973 

Other financial assets

  a   3,598,642   3,595,216   —     3,429,143   166,073 

Financial assets included in assets held for sale

  a   3,098,196   3,224,902   3,824   84,058   3,137,020 

Financial liabilities:

      

Deposits:

      

Non-interest-bearing deposits, demand deposits and deposits at notice

  c  ¥84,121,443  ¥84,121,124  ¥—    ¥84,121,124  ¥—   

Other deposits

  c   44,340,084   44,339,583   —     44,339,583   —   

Call money and bills sold:

      

Call money

  c   1,190,929   1,190,936   —     1,190,936   —   

Bills sold

  c   —     —     —     —     —   

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  c   12,022,593   12,022,593   —     12,022,593   —   

Borrowings

  c   10,652,481   10,761,610   —     10,739,893   21,717 

Debt securities in issue

  c   10,569,117   10,767,745   —     10,587,917   179,828 

Other financial liabilities

  c   6,691,042   6,691,016   —     6,571,846   119,170 

Financial liabilities included in liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale

  c   3,371,556   3,380,139   —     3,380,139   —   
       At March 31, 2021 
       Carrying
amount
   Fair value 
   Notes   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   (In millions) 

Financial assets:

            

Investment securities:

            

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   a   ¥72,015   ¥71,894   ¥22,240   ¥49,654   ¥—   

Loans and advances

   b    97,714,938    100,324,891    —      299,422    100,025,469 

Other financial assets

   b    4,250,454    4,248,069    —      4,195,346    52,723 

Financial liabilities:

            

Deposits:

            

Non-interest-bearing deposits, demand deposits and deposits at notice

   c   ¥108,367,451   ¥108,368,292   ¥—     ¥108,368,292   ¥—   

Other deposits

   c    47,126,203    47,132,088    —      46,990,361    141,727 

Borrowings

   c    19,042,714    19,193,217    —      19,174,649    18,568 

Debt securities in issue

   c    11,228,600    11,375,401    —      11,176,631    198,770 

Other financial liabilities

   c    8,416,003    8,416,002    —      8,381,775    34,227 

       At March 31, 2020 
       Carrying
amount
   Fair value 
   Notes   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   (In millions) 

Financial assets:

            

Investment securities:

            

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   a   ¥320,771   ¥321,057   ¥282,520   ¥38,537   ¥—   

Loans and advances

   b    94,671,818    97,428,956    —      356,570    97,072,386 

Other financial assets

   b    4,229,678    4,227,027    —      4,174,646    52,381 

Financial liabilities:

            

Deposits:

            

Non-interest-bearing deposits, demand deposits and deposits at notice

   c   ¥95,849,958   ¥95,851,474   ¥—     ¥95,851,474   ¥—   

Other deposits

   c    42,581,460    42,594,532    —      42,339,787    254,745 

Borrowings

   c    16,735,474    16,825,055    —      16,797,789    27,266 

Debt securities in issue

   c    10,985,048    10,777,289    —      10,395,526    381,763 

Other financial liabilities

   c    7,149,714    7,149,704    —      7,107,189    42,515 

     At March 31, 2017 
     Carrying
amount
  Fair value 
  Notes   Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
     (In millions) 

Financial assets:

      

Cash and deposits with banks

  a  ¥  47,330,155  ¥  47,330,763  ¥  46,244,819  ¥1,085,944  ¥—   

Call loans and bills bought:

      

Call loans

  a   1,860,620   1,860,539   —     1,860,539   —   

Bills bought

  a   11,589   11,567   —     11,567   —   

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  a   8,924,385   8,926,312   —     8,926,312   —   

Investment securities:

      

Held-to-maturity investments

  b   1,173,419   1,180,319   1,180,319   —     —   

Loans and advances

  a   95,273,845   98,053,056   —     348,691   97,704,365 

Other financial assets

  a   3,424,591   3,421,172��  —     3,255,765   165,407 

Financial liabilities:

      

Deposits:

      

Non-interest-bearing deposits, demand deposits and deposits at notice

  c  ¥81,465,816  ¥81,466,078  ¥—    ¥81,466,078  ¥—   

Other deposits

  c   48,829,474   48,831,229   —     48,831,229   —   

Call money and bills sold:

      

Call money

  c   2,088,020   2,088,067   —     2,088,067   —   

Bills sold

  c   —     —     —     —     —   

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  c   9,424,506   9,424,506   —     9,424,506   —   

Borrowings

  c   12,245,943   12,318,246   —     12,306,066   12,180 

Debt securities in issue

  c   11,165,623   11,329,967   —     11,257,502   72,465 

Other financial liabilities

  c   7,201,137   7,200,488   —     7,080,575   119,913 

 

Notes:

a.

  The fair values of debt instruments at amortized cost are determined using quoted prices in active markets or observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets.

b.

(i)  The carrying amounts of deposits with banks without maturity and loans with no specified repayment dates represent a reasonable estimate of fair value, considering the nature of these financial instruments.
  (ii)  Financial assets with a remaining maturity of six months or less:Short-term financial assets: The carrying amounts represent a reasonable estimate of fair value.
  (iii)  Financial assets with a remaining maturity of more than six months:Long-term financial assets: Except for impaired loans and advances, the fair values are mostly determined using discounted cash flow models taking into account certain factors including counterparties’ credit ratings, pledged collateral, and market interest rates. The fair values of impaired loans and advances are generally determined by discounting the estimated future cash flows over the time period they are expected to be recovered, and may be based on the appraisal value of underlying collateral as appropriate.

c.

  Note that some of the financial assetsliabilities in this category include embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract.
b.The fair values forheld-to-maturity investments are determined using quoted prices in active markets.
c.  (i)  The carrying amounts of demand deposits and deposits without maturity represent a reasonable estimate of fair value, considering the nature of these financial instruments.
  (ii)  Financial liabilities with a remaining maturity of six months or less:Short-term financial liabilities: The carrying amounts represent a reasonable estimate of fair value.
  (iii)  Financial liabilities with a remaining maturity of more than six months:Long-term financial liabilities: The fair values are, in principle, based on the present values of future cash flows calculated using the refinancing rate applied to the same type of instruments for similar remaining maturities. The fair values of debt securities in issue are based on a price quoted by a third party, such as a pricing service or broker, or the present values of future cash flows calculated using the rate derived from yields of bonds issued by SMFG, SMBC and other subsidiaries and publicly offered subordinated bonds published by securities firms.
  Note that some(iv)The carrying amounts and fair values of the financiallease liabilities are not included in this category include embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract.table.

4445

OFFSETTING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following tables present the information about the impact of offsetting of financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position in accordance with the criteria described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” as well as the impact of netting of financial instruments that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements but do not qualify for the offsetting criteria at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
 Gross amounts
of recognized
financial assets
and liabilities
  Gross amounts
offset in statement
of financial
position(1)
  Net amounts
presented in
statement of
financial position
  Related amounts not offset in
statement of financial  position(2)
 Net amounts  Gross amounts
of recognized
financial assets
and liabilities
 Gross amounts
offset in statements
of financial
position(1)
 

Net amounts
presented in
statements of
financial position

  

Related amounts not offset in
statements of financial position(2)

   
 Financial
instruments(3)
 Cash collateral  Financial
instruments(3)
 Cash collateral Net amounts 
 (In millions)  (In millions) 

Financial assets(4):

            

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 ¥9,346,594  ¥(854,891 ¥8,491,703  ¥(8,458,707 ¥—    ¥32,996  ¥13,225,416  ¥(1,487,344 ¥11,738,072  ¥(11,509,771 ¥—    ¥228,301 

Derivative financial instruments

 4,729,842  (844,571 3,885,271  (1,999,343 (479,814 1,406,114  6,049,912  (528,295 5,521,617  (2,987,052 (513,900 2,020,665 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥14,076,436  ¥(1,699,462 ¥12,376,974  ¥(10,458,050 ¥(479,814 ¥1,439,110  ¥19,275,328  ¥(2,015,639 ¥17,259,689  ¥(14,496,823 ¥(513,900 ¥2,248,966 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

��

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financial liabilities(4):

            

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 ¥12,877,484  ¥(854,891 ¥12,022,593  ¥(12,019,290 ¥—    ¥3,303  ¥19,997,250  ¥(1,487,344 ¥18,509,906  ¥(18,484,124 ¥—    ¥25,782 

Derivative financial instruments

 4,526,765  (1,028,749 3,498,016  (2,009,835 (587,693 900,488  5,635,429  (685,996 4,949,433  (2,907,549 (687,340 1,354,544 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥17,404,249  ¥(1,883,640 ¥15,520,609  ¥(14,029,125 ¥(587,693 ¥903,791  ¥25,632,679  ¥(2,173,340 ¥23,459,339  ¥(21,391,673 ¥(687,340 ¥1,380,326 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  At March 31, 2017 
  Gross amounts
of recognized
financial assets
and liabilities
  Gross amounts
offset in statement
of financial
position(1)
  Net amounts
presented in
statement of
financial position
  Related amounts not offset in
statement of financial position(2)
  Net amounts 
     Financial
instruments(3)
  Cash collateral  
  (In millions) 

Financial assets(4):

      

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 ¥9,660,288  ¥(735,903 ¥8,924,385  ¥(8,889,400 ¥—    ¥34,985 

Derivative financial instruments

  5,178,409   (1,114,427  4,063,982   (2,227,109  (318,106  1,518,767 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥14,838,697  ¥(1,850,330 ¥12,988,367  ¥(11,116,509 ¥(318,106 ¥1,553,752 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial liabilities(4):

      

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 ¥10,160,409  ¥(735,903 ¥9,424,506  ¥(9,410,305 ¥—    ¥14,201 

Derivative financial instruments

  5,178,911   (1,289,217  3,889,694   (2,208,039  (719,483  962,172 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥15,339,320  ��(2,025,120 ¥13,314,200  ¥(11,618,344 ¥(719,483 ¥976,373 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  At March 31, 2020 
  Gross amounts
of recognized
financial assets
and liabilities
  Gross amounts
offset in statements
of financial
position(1)
  

Net amounts
presented in
statements of
financial position

  

Related amounts not offset in
statements of financial position(2)

    
  Financial
instruments(3)
  Cash collateral  Net amounts 
  (In millions) 

Financial assets(4):

      

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 ¥15,107,511  ¥(1,361,515 ¥13,745,996  ¥(13,585,714 ¥—    ¥160,282 

Derivative financial instruments

  7,077,165   (797,364  6,279,801   (3,439,440  (692,856  2,147,505 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥22,184,676  ¥(2,158,879 ¥20,025,797  ¥(17,025,154 ¥(692,856 ¥2,307,787 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial liabilities(4):

      

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 ¥16,817,297  ¥(1,361,515 ¥15,455,782  ¥(15,451,371 ¥—    ¥4,411 

Derivative financial instruments

  6,512,645   (957,444  5,555,201   (3,419,951  (808,797  1,326,453 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥23,329,942  ¥(2,318,959 ¥21,010,983  ¥(18,871,322 ¥(808,797 ¥1,330,864 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts offset for derivative financial instruments include cash collateral.

(2)

The amounts of financial instruments and cash collateral have been limited to the net amounts presented in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position so as not to include any over-collateralization.

(3)

Financial instruments includenon-cash collateral at fair value.

(4)

Financial assets and liabilities include amounts that are both subject to and not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements.

The “Gross amounts offset in statementstatements of financial position” column in the above tables represents the impact of offsetting of financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position in accordance with the offsetting criteria. The SMBC Group presents financial assets and liabilities on a net basis in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position only if it currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts and intends to settle on a net basis or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

The “Related amounts not offset in statementstatements of financial position” column comprises (1) financial assets and liabilities subject to netting arrangements, such as the International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s (“ISDA”) Master Agreement, master repurchase agreements and master securities lending agreements, which allow all the outstanding transactions with a particular counterparty to be set off only if the event of default or other predetermined events occur, and (2) cash andnon-cash collateral related to those transactions.

 

4546

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The SMBC Group classifies risks into the following categories: credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and operationalconduct risk. This note presents information about the SMBC Group’s exposure to credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk, and its policies and processes for measuring and managing these risks.

On April 1, 2017, the SMBC Group introduced SMBC Group-wide business units and a Group Chief Officers system (“CxO system”). In addition, the SMBC Group transitioned to a company with three statutory committees: a nominating committee, an audit committee and a compensation committee from a board of corporate auditors governance system, following approval at its ordinary general meeting of shareholders held on June 29, 2017. In connection with the foregoing, the SMBC Group changed its risk management system, including by introducing a Group Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) who reports to the board of directors and its internal committees and conducting various meetings for business executions to centrally identify and manage risks.

Risk Management System

Top management plays an active role inBased on the risk management process outrecognition of recognition for the importance of risk management. The SMBCmanagement, the Group-wide basic policies for risk management are determined by the Management Committee before being authorized by the board of directors.directors in order to have top management play an active role in the risk management process.

In lineaccordance with these basic policies for risk management, the functions for managing major risks are consolidated within the Risk Management Unit, which is independent from business units,three lines of defense have been defined, and the SMBC Group seeks to refine its risk management system through such means as enhancing comprehensive reviews of each risk category. In addition, the Internal Audit Unit conducts internal audits on the status of risk management to verify that risk is appropriately managed.

we have clarified related roles and responsibilities. Risk management systems are in place at individual SMBC Group companies that have been established based on the characteristics of their particular businesses, and measures are being put in accordance withplace to strengthen and improve the basic policies. effectiveness of these systems.

Furthermore, the SMBC Group is sharing information on SMBCstrengthening Group-wide risk management and strengthening related systems through the Group Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) Committee and the Global CRO Committee, which consists of the Group CRO and risk management representatives from strategically important SMBC Group companies.Committee.

The diagram below represents the risk management system of the SMBC Group.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Risk Capital Management

In managing credit risk, market risk, and operational risk affecting the entire SMBC Group, the SMBC Group applies a uniform standard, risk capital based on value at risk (“VaR”), for use in monitoring and managing risks. This standard is applied while taking into account the characteristics of each risk and of the businesses of SMBC Group companies. Specific risk capital measures include setting upper limits for risk exposure based on SMBC Group-wide and business unit risk appetite and SMBC Group-wide management constitution. Each business unit operates business operation within that limit. Through these precautions, the SMBC Group practices management that maintains an appropriate balance between risks and returns based on a comprehensive perspective and secures sufficient financial soundness.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of incurring losses from decline or loss of the value of an asset (includingoff-balance sheet items) that is caused by a credit event including but not limited to the deterioration of financial condition of a borrower. Overseas credits transactions also entail country risk, which is closely related to credit risk. Country risk is the risk of incurring losses caused by changes in political or economic conditions. Credit exposures arise primarily from lending activities such as loans and advances, acquiring investment securities, derivative transactions, andoff-balance sheet transactions such as unused portion of loan commitments.

Credit risk management system

Credit risk is the most significant risk to which the SMBC Group is exposed. The purpose of credit risk management is to keep the credit risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital, to maintain the quality of assets and to ensure returns commensurate with risk.

At the SMBC Group, the Group CRO formulates credit risk management policies each year on the basis of Group-wide basic policies for risk management. The Credit & Investment Planning Department, responsible for

the comprehensive management of credit risk, drafts and administers credit risk regulations including the Group credit policies, managesnon-performing loans (“NPLs”), and performs other aspects of credit portfolio management. Also, the Credit Risk Committee deliberates on matters related to Group-wide credit portfolios. The SMBC Group companies follow the fundamental principles established by the SMBC Group to assess and manage credit risk. Each of SMBC Group companies manages credit risk according to the nature of its business, and assesses and manages the credit risks of individual loans and credit portfolios quantitatively, using consistent standards.

The following chart shows the credit risk management system of SMBC, the SMBC Group’s significant banking subsidiary.

 

LOGOLOGO

At SMBC, the Credit & Investment Planning Department within the Risk Management Unit is responsible for the comprehensive management of credit risk. This department drafts and administers credit policies, the internal rating system, credit authority guidelines, and credit application guidelines, and manages NPLs, including impaired loans, and other aspects of credit portfolio management. The department also cooperates with the Corporate Risk Management Department in quantifying credit risk (risk capital and risk-weighted assets) and controls SMBC’s entire credit risk. Further, the Credit Portfolio Management Department within the Credit & Investment Planning Department strives to stabilize the credit portfolio and manage the risk through credit derivatives, loan asset sales and other instruments.

The credit departments, of SMBC within each business unitin cooperation with branches, conduct credit risk management for loans handled by its unit and manage portfolios of its unit.portfolios. The credit limits they use are based on the baseline amounts that the Credit & Investment Planning Department establishes for each grading category, with particular attention

paid to evaluating and managing customers or loans perceived to have particularly high credit risk. The Corporate Research Department engages in research on industries and analyzes the business and financial conditions of borrower enterprises to detect early signs of problems or growth potential. The Credit Administration Department is responsible for handling NPLs of borrowers classified as potentially bankrupt or lower, and formulates plans for workouts, including

write-offs, and corporate rehabilitation. The department closely liaises with SMBC Servicer Co., Ltd., an SMBCa Group company, which engages in related services to efficiently reduce the amount of NPLs, including through the sale of loans.

The Internal Audit Unit of SMBC, operating independently of the business units, audits asset quality, accuracy of grading and state of credit risk management, and reports the results directly to the board of directors, and the Management Committee and Audit & Supervisory Committee.

SMBC has established the Credit Risk Committee to undertake control of credit risk and to ensure the overall soundness of the loan operations.

Credit risk management methods

To effectively manage the risk involved in individual loans as well as the credit portfolio as a whole, the SMBC Group first acknowledges that every loan entails credit risk, assesses the credit risk posed by each borrower and loan using an internal rating system, and quantifies that risk for control purposes.

Credit risk evaluation

At SMBC, the Credit & Investment Planning Department manages an internal rating system for each asset control category set according to portfolio characteristics. For example, credits to commercial and industrial (“C&I”) companies, individuals for business purposes (domestic only), sovereigns, public sector entities, and financial institutions are assigned an “obligor grade,” which indicates the borrower’s creditworthiness, and/or “facility grade,” which indicates the collectability of assets taking into account the transaction conditions such as guarantee/collateral, and tenor. The business units determine an obligor grade by first assigning a financial grade using a financial strength grading model and data obtained from the obligor’s financial statements, including net worth and cash flows. The financial grade is then adjusted taking into account the actual state of the obligor’s financial position and qualitative factors to derive the obligor grade. The qualitative factors mainly include the expected future cash flows taking into account factors such as historical loss information, the appropriateness of the borrower’s business plan or operational improvement plan, the status of progress of its plan, and the overall support from financial institutions. In the event that the borrower is domiciled overseas, internal ratings for credit are made after taking into consideration the country rank, which represents an assessment of the credit quality of each country based on its political and economic situation, as well as its current account balance and external debt. Obligor grades and facility grades are reviewed once a year and as otherwise necessary, such as when there are changes in the credit situation. The SMBC Group’s subsidiaries carry out credit risk evaluations in line with SMBC.

The tabletables below showsshow the corporate obligor grading system of SMBC.

 

Obligor Grade

 Definition Borrower Category
Domestic (C&I), etc.Overseas (C&I), etc.

J1

G1 Very high certainty of debt repayment Normal
Borrowers

J2

 G2High certainty of debt repayment

J3

G3 Satisfactory certainty of debt repayment

J4

G4 Debt repayment is likely but this could change in cases of significant changes in economic trends or business environment depending on the situation

J5

G5 No problem with debt repayment over the short term, but not satisfactory over the mid to long term and the situation could change in cases of significantany changes in economic trends or business environment

J6

G6 Currently no problem with debt repayment, but there are unstableit is highly likely that this could change in cases of significant changes in economic trends or business and financial factors that could lead to debt repayment problemsenvironment

J7

 G7

Close monitoring is required due to problems in meeting loan terms and conditions, sluggish/unstable business, or financial problems

 

Borrowers
Requiring
Caution

J7R

 G7R

Obligors with loans that are more than three months past due or with restructured loans within the “Borrowers Requiring Caution” category

 

Substandard
Borrowers

J8

 G8

Currently not bankrupt, but experiencing business difficulties, making insufficient progress in restructuring, and highly likely to go bankrupt

 

Potentially
Bankrupt
Borrowers

J9

 G9

Though not yet legally or formally bankrupt, has serious business difficulties and rehabilitation is unlikely; thus, effectively bankrupt

 Effectively

Virtually Bankrupt
Borrowers

J10

 G10

Legally or formally bankrupt

 

Bankrupt Borrowers

Obligor Grade

DefinitionBorrower Category
Overseas (C&I), etc.

G1

Very high certainty or high certainty of debt repaymentNormal
Borrowers

G2

Satisfactory certainty of debt repayment

G3

Debt repayment is likely but this could change in cases of significant changes in economic trends or business environment depending on the situation

G4

Debt repayment is likely but this could change in cases of significant changes in economic trends or business environment

G5

No problem with debt repayment over the short term, but not satisfactory over the mid to long term and the situation could change in cases of any changes in economic trends or business environment

G6

Currently no problem with debt repayment, but it is highly likely that this could change in cases of significant changes in economic trends or business environment

G7

Close monitoring is required due to problems in meeting loan terms and conditions, sluggish/unstable business, or financial problems

Borrowers Requiring
Caution

G7R

Obligors with loans that are more than three months past due or with restructured loans within the “Borrowers Requiring Caution” category

Substandard
Borrowers

G8

Currently not bankrupt, but experiencing business difficulties, making insufficient progress in restructuring, and highly likely to go bankrupt

Potentially Bankrupt
Borrowers

G9

Though not yet legally or formally bankrupt, has serious business difficulties and rehabilitation is unlikely; thus, effectively bankrupt

Virtually Bankrupt
Borrowers

G10

Legally or formally bankrupt

Bankrupt Borrowers

There are also grading systems for loans to individuals such as housing loans and structured finance including project finance, where the repayment source is limited to the cash flows generated by a particular business or asset. For example, the obligor grade of housing loans is determined taking into account various relevant factors such as proportion of the repayment to revenue, proportion of down payment to the value and past due information.

The Credit & Investment Planning Department of SMBC centrally manages the internal rating systems, and designs, operates, supervises and validates the grading models. It validates the grading models (including statistical validation) of main assets following the procedure manual once a year to ensure their effectiveness and suitability.

Quantification of credit risk

At SMBC, credit risk quantification refers to the process of estimating the degree of credit risk of a portfolio or individual loan taking into account not just the obligor’s probability of default (“PD”), but also the concentration of risk in a specific customer or industry and the loss impact of fluctuations in the value of collateral, such as real estate and securities.

Specifically, the PD by grade, loss given default (“LGD”), credit quality correlation among obligors, and other parameter values are estimated using the historical data of obligors and facilities stored in a database to

calculate the credit risk. Then, based on these parameters, SMBC runs a simulation of simultaneous default using the Monte Carlo Simulation to calculate SMBC’s maximum loss exposure to the estimated amount of the maximum losses that may be incurred. Based on these quantitative results, SMBC allocates risk capital.

Risk quantification is also executed for purposes such as to determine the portfolio’s risk concentration or to simulate economic movements (stress tests), and the results are used for making optimal decisions across the whole range of business operations, including formulating business plans and providing a standard against which individual credit applications are assessed.

Credit assessment

At SMBC, the credit assessment of corporate loans involves a variety of financial analyses, including cash flows, to predict an enterprise’s capability of loan repayment and its growth prospects. These quantitative measures, when combined with qualitative analyses of industrial trends, the enterprise’s research and development capabilities, the competitiveness of its products or services, and its management caliber, result in a comprehensive credit assessment. The loan application is analyzed in terms of the intended utilization of the funds and the repayment schedule. In the assessment of housing loans for individuals, SMBC employs a credit assessment model based on credit data amassed and analyzed by SMBC over many years, taking into account various relevant factors including proportion of the repayment to revenue, proportion of down payment to the value and past due information.

Credit monitoring

At SMBC, in addition to analyzing loans at the application stage, the Credit Monitoring System is utilized to reassess obligor grades, and review credit policies for each obligor so that problems can be detected at an early stage, and quick and effective action can be taken. The system includes annual monitoring that is carried out each time the financial results of the obligor enterprise are obtained, as well asad-hoc monitoring that is performed each time credit conditions change.

Credit portfolio management

Risk-taking within the scope of capital

To keep the credit risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital, the Corporate Risk Management Department of the CompanyGroup sets a credit risk capital limit for internal control purposes. Under this limit,sub-limits are set for each business unit. The Corporate Risk Management Department conducts monthly monitoring to make sure that these limits are being followed.

Controlling concentration risk

As the SMBC Group’s equity capital may be materially impaired in the event that the credit concentration risk becomes apparent, the Credit & Investment Planning Department of the CompanyGroup therefore takes measures to manage concentration risks, such as introducing large exposure limits and conducting intensive loan reviews for obligors with large exposures, with an increased focus on industrial sectors with an excessive concentration of credit risk. Further, to manage country risk, SMBC’s Global Credit Department of the International Banking Unit has credit limit guidelines based on each country’s creditworthiness.

Toward active portfolio management

SMBC’s Credit Portfolio Management Department makes use of credit derivatives, loan asset sales, and other instruments to proactively and flexibly manage its portfolio to stabilize credit risk.

Maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral held or other credit enhancements

The following table shows the maximum exposure to credit risk before taking into account any collateral held or other credit enhancements at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Credit risk exposures relating to assets on the consolidated statement of financial position:

    

Credit risk exposures relating to assets on the consolidated statements of financial position:

    

Deposits with banks

  ¥53,992,931   ¥46,207,027   ¥72,311,473   ¥61,626,567 

Call loans and bills bought

   1,881,880    1,872,209    2,553,468    898,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

   8,491,703    8,924,385    11,738,072    13,745,996 

Trading assets

   2,841,148    3,339,928    2,732,480    2,545,703 

Derivative financial instruments

   3,885,271    4,063,982    5,521,617    6,279,801 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   1,528,921    1,582,957    1,667,164    1,454,387 

Investment securities:

        

Held-to-maturity investments

   372,459    1,173,419 

Available-for-sale financial assets

   14,282,706    12,123,770 

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   72,015    320,771 

Debt instruments at FVOCI

   26,392,635    18,054,164 

Loans and advances

   85,129,070    95,273,845    97,714,938    94,671,818 

Other financial assets

   3,598,642    3,424,591    4,250,454    4,229,678 

Financial assets included in assets held for sale

   3,099,888    —   

Credit risk exposures relating tooff-balance sheet items(1):

        

Loan commitments

   60,107,128    62,357,210    71,677,806    62,151,698 

Financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities

   8,426,245    7,924,711    9,872,696    9,204,996 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥247,637,992   ¥248,268,034   ¥306,504,818   ¥275,183,835 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Theoff-balance sheet items represent the nominal amounts of undrawn loan commitments, financial guarantees and other credit-related contingent liabilities.

Based on the table above, excluding loan commitments (refer to Note 4142 “Contingency and Capital Commitments”), the majority of the total exposure to credit risk is derived from “Loans and advances” and“Available-for-sale financial assets.advances.

Collateral and other credit enhancements

The SMBC Group considers the acquisition of collateral and guarantees as a secondary repayment source to further enhance loan recovery and minimize credit risk. Based on the assessment of a borrower’s real financial condition and potential future cash flows, the SMBC Group shall analyze the borrower’s repayment ability and require sufficient collateral in the form of an asset or third-party obligation. This serves to mitigate the inherent credit risk in the exposure, by either improving recoveries in the event of a default or transferring the borrower’s obligation to guarantors. Collateral received is mainly segregated into (1) financial collateral such as cash, deposits and securities, (2) real estate collateral such as land and buildings, and (3) guarantees received from sovereigns, municipal corporations, credit guarantee corporations and other public entities, financial institutions, and other companies.

The SMBC Group’s credit risk management is mainly based on an analysis of the repayment ability from the cash flows of the borrower’s business performance, and the collateral and other credit enhancements are considered as secondary repayment sources in the SMBC Group’s business practice. At the time of the primary lending decision, the SMBC Group evaluates the collateral on an individual borrower basis to consider its financial effect for mitigating credit risk. There-evaluation of the collateral and other credit enhancements will be performed regularly, depending on the borrower’s creditworthiness. In case there is a significant change in the

borrower’s repayment ability due to a deterioration in its creditworthiness and/or its cash flows, the SMBC Group may utilize the collateral and other credit enhancements as a source of repayment.

The following table shows the financial effect of collateral and other credit enhancements on loans and advances for borrowers requiring caution and impaired loans and advances at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The maximum collateral amounts included in the disclosure are limited to the carrying value of loans and advances where the credit exposure is over-collateralized.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Loans and advances for borrowers requiring caution and impaired loans and advances

  ¥  1,965,681   ¥  3,212,447 

Impaired loans and advances

  ¥1,171,576   ¥845,329 

Financial effect of collateral and other credit enhancements

   959,015    1,422,996    394,819    281,382 

Concentration of risks of loans and advances with credit risk exposure

An analysis of concentrations of credit risk from loans and advances by geographical sector and industry sector at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 is shown below. The concentration by geographical sector is measured based on the domicile of the borrower.

Geographical sector

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic

  ¥  57,830,627  ¥  68,020,094   ¥63,307,158  ¥60,184,755 

Foreign:

      

Americas

   11,221,244  11,417,162    12,688,446  13,866,321 

Europe

   4,949,471  5,031,197    7,056,152  6,552,895 

Asia

   8,423,747  8,412,109    11,432,361  11,010,138 

Others

   3,434,838  3,310,164    4,341,438  4,028,641 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   28,029,300  28,170,632    35,518,397  35,457,995 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   85,859,927  96,190,726    98,825,555  95,642,750 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan
fees—net

   (239,181 (236,425   (261,330 (264,527

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (491,676 (680,456   (849,287 (706,405
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845 

Carrying amount

  ¥97,714,938  ¥94,671,818 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Industry sector

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic:

      

Manufacturing

  ¥7,961,620  ¥9,578,147   ¥10,174,683  ¥8,787,566 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   145,957  174,021    277,471  280,233 

Construction

   947,765  1,151,989    886,539  919,043 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   5,424,054  5,365,225    5,878,522  5,637,560 

Wholesale and retail

   5,288,767  5,721,005    6,014,746  5,375,802 

Finance and insurance

   2,777,862  2,844,546    3,423,625  3,217,545 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   9,017,664  10,101,846    11,760,698  10,666,446 

Services

   4,255,228  4,885,247    4,831,938  4,452,195 

Municipalities

   1,000,286  1,216,211    625,639  839,878 

Lease financing

   14,629  2,706,641    24,678  8,380 

Consumer(1)

   16,363,489  19,096,755    15,274,719  15,691,638 

Others

   4,633,306  5,178,461    4,133,900  4,308,469 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   57,830,627  68,020,094    63,307,158  60,184,755 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

      

Public sector

   372,008  299,746    309,372  335,071 

Financial institutions

   4,496,646  4,588,001    7,241,844  6,220,956 

Commerce and industry

   21,023,885  21,041,905    24,659,663  25,597,599 

Lease financing

   357,660  404,658    306,988  309,531 

Others

   1,779,101  1,836,322    3,000,530  2,994,838 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   28,029,300  28,170,632    35,518,397  35,457,995 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   85,859,927  96,190,726    98,825,555  95,642,750 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan
fees—net

   (239,181 (236,425   (261,330 (264,527

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (491,676 (680,456   (849,287 (706,405
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845 

Carrying amount

  ¥97,714,938  ¥94,671,818 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The balance in Consumer mainly consists of housing loans. The housing loan balances amounted to ¥11,482,678¥10,736,709 million and ¥13,766,771¥10,913,869 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

The following tables show a disaggregation of the structured finance loans and advances balances, where the repayment source is limited to the cash flows generated by a particular business or asset, and the balances of secured or unsecured consumer loans at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. These loans and advances are included in the preceding tables.

Structured finance:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Real estate finance

  ¥2,421,408   ¥2,222,530   ¥2,980,521   ¥2,601,130 

Project finance

   3,976,222    3,859,424    4,755,671    4,243,862 

Other structured finance

   374,430    370,160    513,813    473,436 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total structured finance

  ¥  6,772,060   ¥  6,452,114   ¥8,250,005   ¥7,318,428 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consumer:

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Secured loans(1)

  ¥12,255,845   ¥14,994,042   ¥11,340,676   ¥11,538,195 

Unsecured loans

   4,107,644    4,102,713    3,934,043    4,153,443 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total consumer

  ¥16,363,489   ¥19,096,755   ¥15,274,719   ¥15,691,638 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

The secured loans and advances mainly represent housing loans. The housing loan balances amounted to ¥11,482,678¥10,736,709 million and ¥13,766,771¥10,913,869 million at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

Loans and advances by creditCredit quality categoryanalysis

LoansThe following tables set forth information about the gross carrying amount of financial assets and advances are summarized as follows:the exposure to credit risk on loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts by stage allocation and internal rating grades of SMBC. Refer to Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for information on stage allocation. Also refer to Note 46 “Financial Risk Management” for information on obligor grading system of SMBC.

 

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Neither past due nor impaired

  ¥84,856,335  ¥94,825,134 

Past due but not impaired

   124,724   136,904 

Impaired(1)

   878,868   1,228,688 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   85,859,927   96,190,726 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan fees—net

   (239,181  (236,425

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (491,676  (680,456
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070  ¥95,273,845 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2021 
   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Loans and advances at amortized cost:

     

Normal

     

J1-6

  ¥42,556,624  ¥489,127  ¥—    ¥43,045,751 

G1-6

   26,374,296   922,810   —     27,297,106 

Japanese government and local municipal corporations

   2,804,786   —     —     2,804,786 

Other(1)

   22,419,540   104,469   —     22,524,009 

Requiring caution

     

J7

   —     1,107,499   —     1,107,499 

G7

   —     707,272   —     707,272 

Other(1)

   —     167,556   —     167,556 

Impaired(2)

   —     —     1,171,576   1,171,576 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   94,155,246   3,498,733   1,171,576   98,825,555 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan fees—net

      (261,330

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (170,156  (255,909  (423,222  (849,287
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Carrying amount

     ¥ 97,714,938 
     

 

 

 

 

(1)Loans and advances to borrowers who are classified in the borrower categories of substandard borrowers, potentially bankrupt borrowers, effectively bankrupt borrowers, and bankrupt borrowers described in the obligor grading system represent impaired loans and advances.

Loans and advances neither past due nor impaired

The following tables show the credit quality of the portfolio of loans and advances that were neither past due nor impaired, by geography and by industry based on the corporate obligor grading system of SMBC at March 31, 2018 and 2017. Since the internal rating system of SMBC’s consumer portfolio differs from the corporate obligor grading system, the balances of loans and advances to consumers are included in the grade category of “Other.” Additionally, as the SMBC Group’s subsidiaries are adopting various internal rating systems which differ from SMBC, the grade category of “Other” also includes some balances of loans and advances held by those subsidiaries.

  At March 31, 2018 
  Normal  Requiring Caution    
  J1-3  J4-6  Japanese
government
and local
municipal
corporations
  Other  J 7  Other  Total 
  (In millions) 

Domestic:

       

Manufacturing

 ¥4,275,861  ¥2,190,117  ¥—    ¥1,196,566  ¥199,616  ¥22,681  ¥7,884,841 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

  81,900   42,892   13,973   207   599   —     139,571 

Construction

  319,394   468,222   —     119,439   26,779   459   934,293 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

  4,069,995   1,066,246   86,932   133,132   46,657   148   5,403,110 

Wholesale and retail

  2,333,434   2,399,747   —     297,583   155,584   1,421   5,187,769 

Finance and insurance

  1,801,410   349,934   2,785   618,935   1,630   5   2,774,699 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

  5,696,289   3,082,764   13,696   95,634   87,218   7   8,975,608 

Services

  1,599,011   2,355,545   37,693   94,218   96,498   115   4,183,080 

Municipalities

  —     —     1,000,286   —     —     —     1,000,286 

Lease financing

  —     —     —     14,629   —     —     14,629 

Consumer(1)

  —     234   —     15,900,425   1,669   73,180   15,975,508 

Others

  53,633   2,057,571   1,685,694   728,206   69,005   680   4,594,789 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

  20,230,927   14,013,272   2,841,059   19,198,974   685,255   98,696   57,068,183 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  G1-3  G4-6    Other  G 7  Other  Total 

Foreign:

       

Public sector

  191,678   81,448   —     97,890   30   941   371,987 

Financial institutions

  2,381,927   338,659   —     1,752,693   —     7,891   4,481,170 

Commerce and industry

  14,009,273   2,425,819   —     4,114,066   222,395   53,793   20,825,346 

Lease financing

  23,290   —     —     330,406   —     3,964   357,660 

Others

  1,194,334   161,795   —     383,463   9,964   2,433   1,751,989 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

  17,800,502   3,007,721   —     6,678,518   232,389   69,022   27,788,152 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥38,031,429  ¥17,020,993  ¥2,841,059  ¥25,877,492  ¥917,644  ¥167,718  ¥84,856,335 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The balance in the grade category of “Other” in Consumer includes housing loans, which amounted to ¥11,302,350¥10,615,897 million and ¥51,189¥20,789 million for the borrower category of Normal and Requiring Caution, respectively.

(2)

“Impaired” refers to loans and advances to borrowers with obligor grades not higher than 7R.

  At March 31, 2017 
  Normal  Requiring Caution    
  J 1-3  J 4-6  Japanese
government
and local
municipal
corporations
  Other  J 7  Other  Total 
  (In millions) 

Domestic:

 

Manufacturing

 ¥5,220,451  ¥2,294,471  ¥—    ¥1,528,465  ¥371,365  ¥34,956  ¥9,449,708 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

  111,241   45,573   500   5,955   7,905   588   171,762 

Construction

  271,321   479,408   —     323,281   33,050   16,279   1,123,339 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

  3,000,896   1,805,631   129,708   317,943   58,684   18,869   5,331,731 

Wholesale and retail

  2,182,359   2,483,635   —     733,264   155,778   36,234   5,591,270 

Finance and insurance

  1,897,381   346,939   3,243   575,688   1,344   15,702   2,840,297 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

  5,188,687   3,028,913   35,078   1,496,839   99,237   104,524   9,953,278 

Services

  1,552,427   2,350,110   34,826   690,201   97,651   45,520   4,770,735 

Municipalities

  —     —     1,042,346   157,144   —     16,721   1,216,211 

Lease financing

  —     —     —     2,610,519   —     87,533   2,698,052 

Consumer(1)

  —     146   —     18,470,768   3,012   183,247   18,657,173 

Others

  53,091   2,090,278   2,298,829   590,353   94,415   6,101   5,133,067 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

  19,477,854   14,925,104   3,544,530   27,500,420   922,441   566,274   66,936,623 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  G 1-3  G 4-6    Other  G 7  Other  Total 

Foreign:

       

Public sector

  220,796   72,198   —     6,516   —     211   299,721 

Financial institutions

  2,586,295   431,372   —     1,538,913   —     24,481   4,581,061 

Commerce and industry

  14,068,055   2,546,812   —     3,778,524   306,315   106,831   20,806,537 

Lease financing

  24,592   —     —     355,141   —     12,763   392,496 

Others

  1,219,303   181,808   —     386,418   10,914   10,253   1,808,696 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

  18,119,041   3,232,190   —     6,065,512   317,229   154,539   27,888,511 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥37,596,895  ¥18,157,294  ¥3,544,530  ¥33,565,932  ¥1,239,670  ¥720,813  ¥94,825,134 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2020 
   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Loans and advances at amortized cost:

     

Normal

     

J1-6

  ¥39,631,009  ¥198,143  ¥—    ¥ 39,829,152 

G1-6

   27,437,173   522,780   —     27,959,953 

Japanese government and local municipal corporations

   3,091,323   —     —     3,091,323 

Other(1)

   22,837,826   111,801   —     22,949,627 

Requiring caution

     

J7

   —     579,539   —     579,539 

G7

   —     202,207   —     202,207 

Other(1)

   —     185,620   —     185,620 

Impaired(2)

   —     —     845,329   845,329 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross loans and advances

   92,997,331   1,800,090   845,329   95,642,750 

Adjust: Unearned income, unamortized premiums—net and deferred loan fees—net

      (264,527

Less: Allowance for loan losses

   (203,286  (147,382  (355,737  (706,405
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Carrying amount

     ¥94,671,818 
     

 

 

 

 

(1)

The balance in the grade category of “Other” in Consumer includes housing loans, which amounted to ¥13,519,680¥10,799,400 million and ¥70,963¥21,898 million for the borrower category of Normal and Requiring Caution, respectively.

(2)

“Impaired” refers to loans and advances to borrowers with obligor grades not higher than 7R.

Modified loans and advances that were subject to lifetime ECL measurement amounted to ¥100,789 million and ¥42,420 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The net modification gain or loss is not material.

   At March 31, 2021 
   12-month
ECL
   Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
   Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
   Total 
   (In millions) 

Loan commitments and financial guarantees(1):

        

Gross carrying amount

  ¥35,035,453   ¥721,955   ¥41,173   ¥35,798,581 

Allowance for off-balance sheet items

   33,034    35,480    7,181    75,695 
   At March 31, 2020 
   12-month
ECL
   Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
   Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
   Total 
   (In millions) 

Loan commitments and financial guarantees(1):

        

Gross carrying amount

  ¥29,711,738   ¥276,070   ¥24,820   ¥30,012,628 

Allowance for off-balance sheet items

   46,118    21,423    3,713    71,254 

(1)

Loan commitments are the undrawn components of loan commitments on which ECL can be separately identified from those on the drawn components.

Loans and advances past due but not impaired

The SMBC Group assesses the credit quality of loans and advances taking into account past due information on a borrower basis, and does not comprehensively collate the data related to the age analysis of loans and advances that were past due but not impaired on an individual basis. The aggregate balances of loans and advances of borrowers with one or more facilities, where any of the facilities are past due for less than three months but not impaired as at March 31, 2018 and 2017 were ¥163,902 million and ¥167,159 million, respectively. Those aggregate balances therefore include individual loans and advances which are not past due. Thus,Movements in the tables below, the SMBC Group provides the amount of loans and advances where the final payment at contractual maturity is past due, by geography and by industry, at March 31, 2018 and 2017. For reference, since all the loans and advances that are past due over three months are treated as impaired, those loans and advances are not included in the tables below.

  At March 31, 2018 
  Past due up to
1 month
  Past due
1-2 months
  Past due
2-3 months
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Domestic:

    

Manufacturing

 ¥476  ¥50  ¥—    ¥526 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

  —     —     —     —   

Construction

  1   10   51   62 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

  45   —     —     45 

Wholesale and retail

  2,240   318   21   2,579 

Finance and insurance

  65   76   —     141 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

  73   44   —     117 

Services

  245   —     —     245 

Lease financing

  —     —     —     —   

Consumer

  55,020   10,298   3,378   68,696 

Others

  2,791   44   21   2,856 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

  60,956   10,840   3,471   75,267 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

Financial institutions

  11,934   165   1,548   13,647 

Commerce and industry

  14,822   2,705   13,554   31,081 

Others

  2,402   1,676   651   4,729 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

  29,158   4,546   15,753   49,457 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥90,114  ¥15,386  ¥19,224  ¥124,724 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  At March 31, 2017 
  Past due up to
1 month
  Past due
1-2 months
  Past due
2-3 months
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Domestic:

    

Manufacturing

 ¥701  ¥153  ¥4  ¥858 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

  8   —     —     8 

Construction

  423   118   27   568 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

  612   2   —     614 

Wholesale and retail

  5,436   1,345   235   7,016 

Finance and insurance

  59   55   —     114 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

  832   164   56   1,052 

Services

  1,421   306   212   1,939 

Lease financing

  523   51   46   620 

Consumer

  41,103   12,508   22,666   76,277 

Others

  3,617   —     531   4,148 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

  54,735   14,702   23,777   93,214 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

Financial institutions

  2,313   234   2,022   4,569 

Commerce and industry

  17,326   8,418   9,641   35,385 

Others

  1,822   1,293   621   3,736 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

  21,461   9,945   12,284   43,690 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥76,196  ¥24,647  ¥36,061  ¥136,904 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Impaired loans and advances

The following table shows the impaired loans and advances, by geography and by industry, at March 31, 2018 and 2017.

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  ¥76,253  ¥127,581 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining

   6,386   2,251 

Construction

   13,410   28,082 

Transportation, communications and public enterprises

   20,899   32,880 

Wholesale and retail

   98,419   122,719 

Finance and insurance

   3,022   4,135 

Real estate and goods rental and leasing

   41,939   147,516 

Services

   71,903   112,573 

Lease financing

   —     7,969 

Consumer

   319,285   363,305 

Others

   35,661   41,246 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic

   687,177   990,257 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign:

   

Public sector

   21   25 

Financial institutions

   1,829   2,371 

Commerce and industry

   167,458   199,983 

Lease financing

   —     12,162 

Others

   22,383   23,890 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total foreign

   191,691   238,431 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total impaired loans and advances before allowance for loan losses

   878,868   1,228,688 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses for impaired loans and advances

   (369,386  (532,451
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net impaired loans and advances

  ¥509,482  ¥696,237 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Renegotiated loans and advancesECL allowance

The following table showstables show reconciliations from the opening balance to the closing balance of the ECL allowance by class of financial instrument.

   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Loans and advances at amortized cost(1):

     

Balance at April 1, 2019

  ¥     158,094  ¥       92,446  ¥       354,448  ¥     604,988 

Transfer to 12-month ECL

   880   (829  (51  —   

Transfer to lifetime ECL not credit-impaired

   (2,414  4,264   (1,850  —   

Transfer to lifetime ECL credit-impaired

   (1,650  (7,938  9,588   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net transfers between stages

   (3,184  (4,503  7,687   —   

Provision for loan losses(2)

   52,085   60,724   136,669   249,478 

Charge-offs(3)

   —     —     153,992   153,992 

Recoveries

   —     —     12,413   12,413 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   —     —     141,579   141,579 

Others(4)

   (3,709  (1,285  (1,488  (6,482
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2020

  ¥203,286  ¥147,382  ¥355,737  ¥706,405 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Transfer to 12-month ECL

   6,126   (5,770  (356  —   

Transfer to lifetime ECL not credit-impaired

   (10,899  13,261   (2,362  —   

Transfer to lifetime ECL credit-impaired

   (3,248  (25,771  29,019   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net transfers between stages

   (8,021  (18,280  26,301   —   

Provision (credit) for loan losses(5)

   (29,279  123,622   182,742   277,085 

Charge-offs(3)

   —     —     161,603   161,603 

Recoveries

   —     —     12,801   12,801 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

   —     —     148,802   148,802 

Others(4)

   4,170   3,185   7,244   14,599 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2021

  ¥170,156  ¥255,909  ¥423,222  ¥849,287 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

“Loans and advances at amortized cost” includes allowance for undrawn components of loan commitments issued to retail customers which cannot be separately identified from that for the drawn components.

(2)

The increase of allowance for 12-month ECL and lifetime ECL not credit-impaired for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 is primarily due to the incorporation of forward-looking macroeconomic information reflecting the impact of the COVID-19 economic outlook.

(3)

Charge-offs for lifetime ECL credit-impaired are primarily related to those for consumer loans.

(4)

Others mainly include foreign exchange translations.

(5)

The increase in the balance of the total ECL allowance at March 31, 2021 is primarily due to both an increase in loans and advances to corporate borrowers who were severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and, as a result, whose obligor grades were downgraded to the extent that the credit risk on loans and advances to such borrowers was determined to be significantly increased since initial recognition, and additional adjustments to the ECL allowance for some portfolios of loans and advances, offset by the release of part of the ECL allowance due to the improved macroeconomic forecast. For additional information, refer to Note 3 “Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments.”

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the ECL allowance significantly increased by ¥142,882 million from ¥706,405 million at March 31, 2020 to ¥849,287 million at March 31, 2021. This increase was due to the reflection of the current and forward-looking impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the obligor grades of many corporate borrowers severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic were downgraded to the extent that the credit risk on loans and advances to

such borrowers was determined to be significantly increased since initial recognition and their ECL allowance was measured at an amount equal to the lifetime ECL.

The Japanese and global economy was assumed to recover from the fiscal year ending March 31, 20182022 and 2017 that would otherwise be pastreach pre-COVID-19 level by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023, and this reflected the release of part of the ECL allowance.

However, additional ECL adjustments were made for certain industry-related portfolios selected based on changes in factors such as the market conditions and bankruptcy trends as a result of the reduction in economic activity by requests for voluntary restraint on movement and business closure requests to commercial facilities.

As for the allowance for 12-month ECL, it decreased by ¥33,130 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, due or impaired, but whose terms have been renegotiated without providing any financial concessions. Theseto a release of part of the ECL allowance as a result of reflecting the improved economic forecast, which was partially offset by an increase in the ECL allowance due to the additional adjustments made for some industry-related portfolios. On the other hand, the allowance for lifetime ECL not credit-impaired and credit-impaired increased by ¥108,527 million and ¥67,485 million, respectively for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, due to an increase in loans and advances are mainly classified as requiring caution into corporate borrowers who were severely affected by the table of “LoansCOVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the total ECL allowance increased by ¥142,882 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. For additional information, refer to Note 3 “Critical Accounting Estimates and advances neither past due nor impaired” in the section “Loans and advances by credit quality category.”

The SMBC Group continually assesses the creditworthiness of a borrower for whom terms of the loans and advances have been renegotiated, taking into account the actual state of the borrower’s financial position and qualitative factors. Further details are described in “Credit risk evaluation” in the section “Credit risk management methods.” Loans and advances whose terms have been renegotiated and financial concessions have been provided are reported as impaired and included in the table of “Impaired loans and advances” in the section “Loans and advances by credit quality category.Judgments.

 

   At March 31,
   2018  2017
   (In millions)
Renegotiated loans and advances  ¥292,466  ¥463,092
   12-month
ECL
  Lifetime ECL
not credit-
impaired
  Lifetime ECL
credit-
impaired
  Total 
   (In millions) 

Loan commitments and financial guarantees(1):

     

Balance at April 1, 2019

  ¥36,795  ¥18,289  ¥5,761  ¥60,845 

Net transfers between stages

   (87  (173  260   —   

Provision (credit) for off-balance sheet items

   9,461   3,307   (2,308  10,460 

Others

   (51  —     —     (51
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2020

  ¥46,118  ¥21,423  ¥3,713  ¥71,254 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net transfers between stages

   (632  (55  687   —   

Provision (credit) for off-balance sheet items

   (11,492  14,112   2,781   5,401 

Others

   (960  —     —     (960
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2021

  ¥33,034  ¥35,480  ¥7,181  ¥75,695 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

ECL allowance for loan commitments is that for the undrawn components of loan commitments, which can be separately identified from that for the drawn components.

Trading assets, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and investment securities

The following table showstables show an analysis of trading assets, financial assets at fair value through profit or lossheld-to-maturity investments andavailable-for-sale financial assets debt instruments at amortized cost and at fair value through other comprehensive income based on the external rating system at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, excluding instruments with equity instruments.features. Collateral is generally not obtained directly from the issuers.

 

   At March 31, 2018 
   Trading assets   Financial assets at
fair value through
profit or loss
   Held-to-maturity
investments
   Available-for-sale
financial assets
   Total 
   (In millions) 

AAA

  ¥190,650   ¥—     ¥—     ¥4,865,723   ¥5,056,373 

AA- to AA+

   2,399,644    1,518,748    372,459    8,538,879    12,829,730 

A- to A+

   192,943    —      —      276,042    468,985 

Lower than A-

   56,458    —      —      532,626    589,084 

Unrated

   1,453    10,173    —      69,436    81,062 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥2,841,148   ¥1,528,921   ¥372,459   ¥14,282,706   ¥19,025,234 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairedavailable-for-sale financial assets with a carrying amount of ¥154 million at March 31, 2018 are included in the table above.

   At March 31, 2021 
   Trading assets(1)   Financial assets at
fair value through
profit or loss(1)
   Debt instruments at
amortized cost(1)(2)
   Debt instruments at
fair value through
other comprehensive
income(1)(2)
 
   (In millions) 

AAA

  ¥132,666   ¥8,010   ¥—     ¥8,444,814 

AA- to AA+

   2,132,634    38,662    22,300    16,135,234 

A- to A+

   249,114    24,397    —      932,467 

Lower than A-

   137,305    91,862    48,181    782,352 

Unrated

   15,439    1,081    1,534    136,063 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥2,667,158   ¥164,012   ¥72,015   ¥26,430,930 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At March 31, 2020 
   Trading assets(1)   Financial assets at
fair value through
profit or loss(1)
   Debt instruments at
amortized cost(1)(2)
   Debt instruments at
fair value through
other comprehensive
income(1)(2)
 
   (In millions) 

AAA

  ¥101,336   ¥10,005   ¥—     ¥8,104,653 

AA- to AA+

   2,125,095    346,039    282,379    8,236,637 

A- to A+

   135,445    23,981    —      763,612 

Lower than A-

   98,275    106,682    38,299    694,051 

Unrated

   7,193    559    93    26,627 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥2,467,344   ¥487,266   ¥320,771   ¥17,825,580 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

   At March 31, 2017 
   Trading assets   Financial assets at
fair value through
profit or loss
   Held-to-maturity
investments
   Available-for-sale
financial assets
   Total 
   (In millions) 

AAA

  ¥242,240   ¥—     ¥—     ¥4,666,664   ¥4,908,904 

AA- to AA+

   2,803,467    1,570,904    1,173,419    6,822,953    12,370,743 

A- to A+

   236,348    —      —      132,943    369,291 

Lower than A-

   39,380    —      —      482,097    521,477 

Unrated

   18,493    12,053    —      19,113    49,659 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥3,339,928   ¥1,582,957   ¥1,173,419   ¥12,123,770   ¥18,220,074 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairedavailable-for-sale financial assets with a carrying amount of ¥526 million at March 31, 2017 are included in the table above.
(1)

The amounts represent fair value for trading assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, whereas they represent the gross carrying amount for debt instruments at amortized cost and at fair value through other comprehensive income.

(2)

There were no debt instruments at amortized cost or debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income subject to lifetime ECL at March 31, 2021 and 2020.

Credit risk from derivative financial instruments

The SMBC Group maintains control limits on derivative positions, by both amount and term. At any one time, the amount subject to credit risk is limited to the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are favorable to the SMBC Group (i.e., assets where their fair value is positive).

The SMBC Group’s credit risk from derivatives is mitigated where possible through netting agreements whereby derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty can be offset. Netting agreements, such as the ISDA master agreement, allow the netting of obligations arising under all of the derivative transactions that the agreement covers upon the counterparty’s default, regardless of maturity and currency, resulting in a single net claim against the counterparty. The SMBC Group’s credit risk is also mitigated by collateral arrangements through the credit support annex, resulting in collateral delivered or received regularly based on the replacement costs of derivatives.

Market Risk and Liquidity Risk

Market risk is the possibility that fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, stock prices or other market prices will change the market value of financial products, leading to a loss. The purpose of market risk management is to keep the market risk exposure to a permissible level relative to capital.

Liquidity risk is defined as the uncertainty around the ability to meet debt obligations without incurring unacceptably large losses. An example of such risk is the possible inability to meet current and future cash flow/ collateral needs, both expected and unexpected. In such cases, the SMBC Group may be required to raise funds at less than favorable rates or be unable to raise sufficient funds for settlement. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that the SMBC Group is in a position to address its liquidity obligations through monitoring the liquidity gap between assets and liabilities, and by maintaining highly liquid supplementary funding resources.

On the basis of the SMBC Group-wide basic policies for risk management, the SMBC Group has a quantitative management process to control market and liquidity risks on an SMBCa Group-wide basis by setting allowable risk limits by company.basis. The SMBC Group at least annually reviews and identifies which companies primarily carry the market and liquidity risks within the SMBC Group. The SMBC Group sets permissible levels and upper limits of risk for each identified company in consideration of those companies’ business plans. The SMBC Group ensures that each identified company establishes a risk management system that is appropriate to the risks it faces, and hasbuilt-in transparent risk management processes which clearly separatingseparate front, middle and back office operations, and establishes a control system of mutual checks and balances.

Framework for market and liquidity risk management

The board of directors authorizes important matters relating to the management of market and liquidity risks, such as the basic policies and risk limits,appetite, which are decided by the Management Committee. The Corporate Risk Management Department, which is independent of the business units that directly handle market transactions, manages market and liquidity risks in an integrated manner. The Corporate Risk Management Department not only monitors the current risk situations but also reports regularly to the Management Committee and the board of directors.

Additionally, the Asset Liability Management (“ALM”) Committee meets on a quarterly basis to examine reports on the state of market and liquidity risk management and to discuss the Group’s ALM operation policies. Furthermore, SMBC’s ALM Committee meets on a monthly basis to examine reports on the state of observance of SMBC’s limits on market and liquidity risks, and to discuss SMBC’s ALM operations.

The Internal Audit Unit of SMBCUnder the Group’s internal audit system, internal audits are also periodically performs internal auditsperformed to verify that the risk management framework is functioning properly.

The following chart shows the market and liquidity risk management system of SMBC.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Market risk management methods

The SMBC Group manages market risk capital derived from trading activities andnon-trading activities, including strategic equity investmentshareholding investments and other transactions withinin the risk capital limit which is determinedRisk Appetite Framework by taking into account SMFG’s shareholders’ equity and other principal indicators of the financial position. The SMBC Group also establishes an upper limit on VaR and losses within the risk capital limits.as Risk Appetite Measures.

The SMBC Group’s market risk can be divided into various factors: interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and option risks. The SMBC Group manages each of these risks by employing the VaR method as well as supplemental indicators suitable for managing each risk, such as the basis point value (“BPV”).

VaR is the largest predicted loss that is possible given a fixed confidence interval. For example, the SMBC Group’s VaR indicates the largest loss that is possible for a holding period of one day and a confidence interval of 99.0%. BPV is the amount of change in assessed value as a result of aone-basis-point (0.01%) movement in interest rates.

Value at risk

The principal SMBC Group companies’ internal VaR model makes use of historical data to prepare scenarios for market fluctuations and, by conducting simulations of gains and losses on a net position basis, the model estimates the maximum losses that may occur. The VaR calculation method the SMBC Group employs for both trading andnon-trading activities is based mainly on the following:

 

the historical simulation method;

 

aone-sided confidence interval of 99.0%;

aone-day holding period (aone-year holding period for the strategic equityshareholding investment portfolio); and

 

an observation period of four years (ten years for the strategic equityshareholding investment portfolio).

This method is reviewed periodically and refined, if necessary.

The relationship between the VaR calculated by the model and the actual profit and loss data is back-tested periodically. There were no significant excess losses in the back-testing results including the trading accounts. The back-testing results are reviewed by management, which also monitors the ongoing suitability of the VaR model.

The following tables show the SMBC Group’s VaR by risk category and these figures are prepared based on the internal reporting provided to management. The SMBC Group’s material market risk exposure categories consist of interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, equities and commodities risk and others. The section headed “VaR for Trading Activity” shows VaR for instruments entered into for trading purposes and the VaR model for the trading book includes principal consolidated subsidiaries. The section headed “VaR forNon-Trading Activity” shows VaR for instruments entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. “Strategic EquityShareholding Investment” in the “VaR forNon-Trading Activity” section is a portfolio that consists principally of publicly traded Japanese equities. This portfolio, like that of other financial institutions in Japan, has historically included shares of the SMBC Group’s customers.

 

 (a)

VaR for Trading Activity

 

 Interest rate
risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1)  Interest
rate risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1) 
 (In billions)  (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

     

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

     

SMBC Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥3.2  ¥4.3  ¥3.9  ¥3.6  ¥11.2  ¥6.1  ¥8.8  ¥1.7  ¥3.9  ¥8.1 

Minimum

 1.3  1.2  0.0  1.4  3.5  3.7  6.1  0.0  2.5  5.5 

Daily average

 2.1  2.4  1.5  2.3  7.2  5.1  7.3  0.5  3.2  6.5 

At March 31, 2018

 2.6  3.6  0.0  3.2  8.1 

At March 31, 2021

 5.5  8.1  0.1  3.5  6.2 

SMFG Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥30.9  ¥5.0  ¥11.4  ¥3.6  ¥39.5  ¥15.1  ¥9.9  ¥8.8  ¥3.9  ¥24.4 

Minimum

 6.7  1.5  4.3  1.4  14.5  11.7  6.6  1.9  2.5  15.6 

Daily average

 12.3  3.0  6.3  2.3  22.1  13.2  8.4  4.7  3.2  19.5 

At March 31, 2018

 11.3  4.3  4.3  3.2  21.5 

At March 31, 2021

 14.6  8.8  5.1  3.5  20.7 
 Interest rate
risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1)  Interest
rate risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1) 
 (In billions)  (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

     

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

     

SMBC Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥19.2  ¥3.1  ¥5.3  ¥2.5  ¥22.6  ¥6.0  ¥9.6  ¥2.9  ¥4.7  ¥10.2 

Minimum

 1.5  1.0  0.3  1.2  3.9  3.7  4.0  0.0  2.6  6.2 

Daily average

 8.1  1.7  1.8  1.7  11.8  4.5  5.6  0.7  4.0  7.3 

At March 31, 2017

 1.9  1.2  0.4  1.7  3.9 

At March 31, 2020

 5.4  8.9  0.0  2.6  6.4 

SMFG Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥27.9  ¥3.9  ¥5.8  ¥2.5  ¥34.0  ¥13.7  ¥10.6  ¥9.4  ¥4.7  ¥22.4 

Minimum

 10.3  1.2  1.1  1.2  13.1  9.2  4.4  1.6  2.6  13.8 

Daily average

 16.1  1.9  3.1  1.7  21.4  10.6  6.2  3.7  4.0  16.7 

At March 31, 2017

 16.7  1.6  4.2  1.7  23.6 

At March 31, 2020

 12.6  9.5  2.4  2.6  16.2 

 

(1)

Total for “Maximum,” “Minimum,” and “Daily average” represent the maximum, minimum and daily average of the total of the trading book. For certain subsidiaries, the SMBC Group employs the standardized method and/or the historical simulation method for the VaR calculation method.

 (b)

VaR forNon-Trading Activity

 

 (i)

Banking

 

  Interest rate
risk
  Foreign
exchange risk
  Equities and
commodities
risk
  Others  Total(1) 
  (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

     

SMBC Consolidated

     

Maximum

 ¥31.5  ¥0.0  ¥39.9  ¥0.0  ¥54.5 

Minimum

  25.2   0.0   21.5   0.0   38.0 

Daily average

  27.4   0.0   30.4   0.0   44.4 

At March 31, 2018

  31.3   0.0   28.1   0.0   45.7 

SMFG Consolidated

     

Maximum

 ¥34.0  ¥0.0  ¥39.9  ¥0.0  ¥57.0 

Minimum

  27.8   0.0   21.6   0.0   40.8 

Daily average

  30.2   0.0   30.5   0.0   47.2 

At March 31, 2018

  33.7   0.0   28.1   0.0   48.2 

 Interest rate
risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1)  Interest
rate risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1) 
 (In billions)  (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

     

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021:

     

SMBC Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥34.2  ¥0.0  ¥38.9  ¥0.0  ¥49.9  ¥55.5  ¥0.6  ¥27.1  ¥0.0  ¥58.5 

Minimum

 23.2  0.0  24.7  0.0  37.8  43.1  0.0  7.5  0.0  45.5 

Daily average

 27.0  0.0  32.1  0.0  43.0  49.3  0.3  15.0  0.0  51.7 

At March 31, 2017

 27.4  0.0  34.2  0.0  44.1 

At March 31, 2021

 50.3  0.0  17.4  0.0  54.5 

SMFG Consolidated

          

Maximum

 ¥37.3  ¥0.0  ¥38.9  ¥0.0  ¥53.2  ¥56.1  ¥0.6  ¥27.1  ¥0.0  ¥59.0 

Minimum

 26.4  0.0  24.8  0.0  40.2  43.9  0.0  7.5  0.0  46.2 

Daily average

 30.0  0.0  32.2  0.0  46.1  49.9  0.3  15.0  0.0  52.3 

At March 31, 2017

 30.6  0.0  34.3  0.0  47.4 

At March 31, 2021

 50.8  0.0  17.4  0.0  55.0 
 Interest
rate risk
 Foreign
exchange risk
 Equities and
commodities
risk
 Others Total(1) 
 (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020:

     

SMBC Consolidated

     

Maximum

 ¥46.8  ¥0.0  ¥30.2  ¥0.0  ¥51.5 

Minimum

 32.7  0.0  10.8  0.0  35.6 

Daily average

 40.6  0.0  20.4  0.0  44.3 

At March 31, 2020

 45.4  0.0  15.4  0.0  49.6 

SMFG Consolidated

     

Maximum

 ¥47.6  ¥0.0  ¥30.2  ¥0.0  ¥52.4 

Minimum

 33.6  0.0  10.8  0.0  36.5 

Daily average

 41.5  0.0  20.4  0.0  45.1 

At March 31, 2020

 46.2  0.0  15.4  0.0  50.5 

 

(1)

Total for “Maximum,” “Minimum,” and “Daily average” represent the maximum, minimum and daily average of the total of the banking book.

 (ii)

Strategic EquityShareholding Investment

 

   Equities risk 
   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:2021:

  

SMBC Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,622.9¥1,161.7 

Minimum

   1,309.8784.1 

Daily average

   1,456.6966.1 

At March 31, 20182021

   1,389.41,111.2 

SMFG Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,855.9¥1,337.5 

Minimum

   1,488.1911.2 

Daily average

   1,664.21,122.2 

At March 31, 20182021

   1,603.61,284.1 

   Equities risk 
   (In billions) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2020:

  

SMBC Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,421.0¥1,030.0 

Minimum

   1,146.2717.4 

Daily average

   1,303.7941.3 

At March 31, 20172020

   1,361.8808.2 

SMFG Consolidated

  

Maximum

  ¥1,603.9¥1,180.6 

Minimum

   1,272.8840.5 

Daily average

   1,460.51,092.7 

At March 31, 20172020

   1,544.5942.4 

Stress tests

The market occasionally undergoes extreme fluctuations that exceed projections. Therefore, to manage market risk, it is important to run simulations of situations that may occur only once in many years, orso-called stress tests. To prepare for unexpected market swings, the SMBC Group performs stress tests on a monthly basis based on various scenarios.

The limitations of the VaR methodology include the following:

 

The use of historical data as a proxy for estimating future events may underestimate the probability of extreme market movements. Past market movement is not necessarily a good indicator of future events;

 

The use of a holding period assumes that all positions can be liquidated or hedged in that period of time. This assumption does not fully capture the market risk arising during periods of illiquidity, when liquidation or hedging in that period of time may not be possible;

 

The use of a confidence level neither takes account of, nor makes any statement about, any losses that might occur beyond this level of confidence; and

 

VaR does not capture all of the complex effects of the risk factors on the value of positions and portfolios and could underestimate potential losses.

Additional information for the certain risks

 

 (a)

Interest rate risk

To supplement the above limitations of VaR methodologies, the SMBC Group adopts various indices to measure and monitor the sensitivity of interest rates, including delta, gamma and vega risks. The SMBC Group considers BPV as one of the most significant indices to manage interest rate risk. BPV is the amount of change in the value to the banking and trading book as a result of aone-basis-point (0.01%) movement in interest rates. The principal SMBC Group companies use BPV to monitor interest rate risk, not only on a net basis, but also by term to prevent the concentration of interest rate risk in a specific period. In addition, as previously addressed, the SMBC Group enhances the risk management methods of VaR and BPV by using them in combination with back-testing and stress tests.

Interest rate risk substantially changes depending on the method used for recognizing the expected maturity dates of demand deposits that can be withdrawn at any time, or the method used for estimating the timing of cancellation prior to maturity of time deposits and consumer housing loans. At SMBC, the maturity of demand deposits that are expected to be left with the bank for a prolonged period is regarded to be, at the longest, five years (2.5 years on average), and the cancellation prior to maturity of time deposits and consumer housing loans is estimated based on historical data.

Based on the new standards for interest rate risk in the banking book issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) in April 2016, the FSA revised the related regulatory guidelines pertaining to monitoring of interest rate risks in the banking book in December 2017. The revised disclosure requirements with respect to the changes in economic value of equity (“DEVE”) in the banking book as a result of interest rate shocks have been applied from March 31, 2018.DEVE is defined as a decline in economic value as a result of an interest rate shock. It is calculated by multiplying the interest rate sensitivity (excluding credit spread) and interest rate change. The FSA implements a “materiality test” to identify banks taking excessive interest rate risks. Under the materiality test, the FSA monitors the ratio ofDEVE to Tier 1 capital based on a set of prescribed interest rate shock scenarios. The threshold applied by the FSA is 15% and the ratios for SMBC on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2021 and 2020 were 9.6% and 11.1%, respectively and those for SMFG on a consolidated basis at March 31, 20182021 and 2020 were 4.8%8.1% and 4.2%9.6%, respectively.

Under the related regulatory guidelines prior to the revisions pertaining to monitoring of interest rate risks in the banking book published by FSA in December 2017, a bank would fall into the category of “outlier bank,” as stipulated under Pillar 2 of the Basel Capital Accord, in the event the economic value of that bank declines by more than 20% of total capital as a result of interest rate shocks. This ratio, known as the outlier ratio, was 1.5% for SMBC on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2017, substantially below the 20% criterion. The decline in economic value based on the outlier framework of SMBC on a consolidated basis is shown in the following table.

At March 31, 2017
(In billions, except
percentages)

SMBC Consolidated

Total

¥150.5

Impact of yen interest rates

77.2

Impact of U.S. dollar interest rates

50.8

Impact of euro interest rates

8.8

Percentage of total capital

1.5

Note:Decline in economic value is the decline of the present value of a banking portfolio after interest rate shocks (1st and 99th percentile of observed interest rate changes using aone-year holding period and an observation period of five years).

 

 (b)

Foreign exchange risk

The principal SMBC Group companies set risk limits for each currency to manage the concentration of the foreign currency position. The foreign exchange risk is immaterial as shown above in VaR by risk category.

 (c)

Strategic equityshareholding investment risk

The SMBC Group establishes limits on allowable risk for strategic equityshareholding investments and monitors the observance of those limits to keep stock price fluctuation risk within acceptable parameters. The SMBC Group has been reducing its strategic equityshareholding investments, and the balance is within a permitted level, which is less than 100% of the SMBC Group’s Tier 1 Capital.

Liquidity risk management methods

The SMBCAt Group, regards liquidity risk is regarded as one of the major risks. The SMBC Group managesGroup’s liquidity risk management is based on a framework consisting of setting upper limits for “funding gaps,” maintaining high-quality liquid assets in line with the SMBC Group’s risk appetiteRisk Appetite Measures and establishing contingency plans.

AThe Risk Appetite Measures are measures for selecting the types and levels of risk that the Group is willing to take on or tolerate. As the level of liquidity risk is evaluated based on cash flow and balance sheet conditions, Risk Appetite Measures have been set for both of these areas. These measures include the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, a liquidity regulation, as well as a measure of the periods for which it will be possible to maintain funding gaplevels even under stress due to deposit outflows or other factors, and the ratio which shows how much the stable funding covers the funding for loans and other assets.

The tolerated levels of risk are set based on account funding status, cash management planning, economic environments and other factors, and measures are monitored on a daily or monthly basis in order to limit reliance on short-term funding and appropriately manage liquidity.

As a framework to complement the Risk Appetite Measures, upper limits are set in place on both a Group company basis and an individual branch bases with regard to funding gaps, which is defined as a maturity mismatch between athe source of funds and the use of funds. The SMBC Group actively manages this funding gap by setting limits

Furthermore, contingency plans are established in preparation for emergency situations. These plans contain information on chains of command and lines of reporting as well as detailed action plans depending on the sizeexisting situation (i.e., normal, concerned, or crisis). Meanwhile, SMBC carries out quantitative management of gaps over a given time horizon and limiting reliance on short-term funding. These limits are established on both an SMBC Group company basis and individual branch basis, taking into account cash management planning, systemic factors, and funding status, among other factors. Additionally, funding gap limits are set for individual currencies if necessary. The SMBC Group actively monitors funding gaps on a daily basis. Further, stress tests are regularly carried out by simulating the impact triggered, for example, by the outflow of deposits or having difficulties in funding from money markets, in order to thoroughly comprehend the amount required to fund when the liquidity risk is realized. The SMBC Group also monitors quantitative indicators of the levels of risk exposure to be assumed, such as Liquidity Coverage Ratio. In addition, SMBC, the SMBC Group’s major banking subsidiary, establishes quantitative alert systemindications based on early warning indicators established to detect liquidity risksassist the bank in promptly and systematically. Additionally, fundingsystematically detecting liquidity is maintained by holding assets, such as central bank reserves and government bonds which can be immediately converted to cash, in line with the SMBC Group’s risk appetite, in order to smoothly raise the required funds even during market disruption.risks.

Furthermore, contingency plans are developed at each SMBC Group company to respond to the liquidity risk when being realized, by creating detailed action plans such as lowering the upper limit for the funding gap, depending on the existing situation (i.e. normal, concerned, or critical) and the respective circumstances.

Maturity analysis of financial liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020

The following tables show a maturity analysis of the contractual undiscounted cash flows for financial liabilities at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The amount of interest on debt instruments is not included in the maturity tables below due to its insignificance.

 

 At March 31, 2018  At March 31, 2021 
 On demand Not later than
three months
 Later than
three months
and not later
than one year
 Later than
one year and
not later than
three years
 Later than
three years and
not later than
five years
 Later than
five years
 Total  On demand Not later than
three months
 Later than
three months
and not later
than one year
 Later than
one year and
not later than
three years
 Later than
three years and
not later than
five years
 Later than
five years
 Total 
  (In millions)  (In millions) 

Non-derivative financial instruments:

              

Deposits

 ¥79,239,076  ¥31,907,636  ¥12,755,005  ¥3,189,790  ¥701,374  ¥654,717  ¥128,447,598  ¥102,997,450  ¥35,126,538  ¥13,139,583  ¥3,031,727  ¥648,342  ¥552,018  ¥155,495,658 

Call money and bills sold

 47,942  1,141,653  1,334   —     —     —    1,190,929  2,678  1,350,926  14,911   —     —     —    1,368,515 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 20,833  12,001,760   —     —     —     —    12,022,593  202,934  18,243,737   —    63,235   —     —    18,509,906 

Trading liabilities

 2,143,899   —     —     —     —     —    2,143,899  2,080,826   —     —     —     —     —    2,080,826 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  —    1,050  91,691  51,183  18,746  73,869  236,539 

Borrowings

 61,205  435,708  6,765,228  601,326  652,481  2,126,169  10,642,117  118,408  2,181,321  5,530,491  4,615,101  4,800,771  1,792,917  19,039,009 

Debt securities in issue

  —    2,407,601  950,334  1,818,271  2,185,578  3,227,737  10,589,521   —    1,969,168  1,557,662  1,959,596  2,072,760  3,533,304  11,092,490 

Lease payable

  —    683  1,884  2,999  1,665  3,086  10,317   —    19,666  62,571  106,129  72,848  134,738  395,952 

Other financial liabilities

 2,554,069  4,129,478  4,342  139   —    3,014  6,691,042  3,350,086  5,058,851  3,322  1,045   —    3,744  8,417,048 

Off balance sheet items:

              

Loan commitments

 60,107,128   —     —     —     —     —    60,107,128  71,677,806   —     —     —     —     —    71,677,806 

Financial guarantee contracts

 8,426,245   —     —     —     —     —    8,426,245  9,872,696   —     —     —     —     —    9,872,696 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Totalnon-derivative financial instruments

 ¥152,600,397  ¥52,024,519  ¥20,478,127  ¥5,612,525  ¥3,541,098  ¥6,014,723  ¥240,271,389  ¥190,302,884  ¥63,951,257  ¥20,400,231  ¥9,828,016  ¥7,613,467  ¥6,090,590  ¥298,186,445 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 ¥3,498,016  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥3,498,016  ¥4,900,077  ¥—    ¥—    ¥608  ¥8,578  ¥40,170  ¥4,949,433 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  At March 31, 2017 
  On demand  Not later than
three months
  Later than
three months
and not later
than one year
  Later than
one year and
not later than
three years
  Later than
three years and
not later than
five years
  Later than
five years
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Non-derivative financial instruments:

       

Deposits

 ¥76,476,402  ¥32,358,045  ¥16,420,032  ¥3,303,700  ¥961,405  ¥755,341  ¥130,274,925 

Call money and bills sold

  30,563   2,052,776   362   4,319   —     —     2,088,020 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  1,902   9,414,026   8,578   —     —     —     9,424,506 

Trading liabilities

  2,071,584   —     —     —     —     —     2,071,584 

Borrowings

  69,370   926,538   6,960,401   868,247   949,406   2,364,402   12,138,364 

Debt securities in issue

  —     3,205,952   1,422,649   1,527,880   2,213,439   2,806,492   11,176,412 

Lease payable

  —     7,042   20,859   48,550   30,408   6,129   112,988 

Other financial liabilities

  2,223,233   4,863,181   11,397   14,966   12,458   75,902   7,201,137 

Off balance sheet items:

       

Loan commitments

  62,357,210   —     —     —     —     —     62,357,210 

Financial guarantee contracts

  7,924,711   —     —     —     —     —     7,924,711 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Totalnon-derivative financial instruments

 ¥151,154,975  ¥52,827,560  ¥24,844,278  ¥5,767,662  ¥4,167,116  ¥6,008,266  ¥244,769,857 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 ¥3,889,694  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥3,889,694 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  At March 31, 2020 
  On demand  Not later than
three months
  Later than
three months
and not later
than one year
  Later than
one year and
not later than
three years
  Later than
three years and
not later than
five years
  Later than
five years
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Non-derivative financial instruments:

       

Deposits

 ¥90,576,919  ¥31,586,693  ¥11,729,113  ¥3,460,144  ¥504,408  ¥579,182  ¥138,436,459 

Call money and bills sold

  8,282   3,690,507   41,751   —     —     —     3,740,540 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  354,639   15,090,564   10,579   —     —     —     15,455,782 

Trading liabilities

  2,018,484   —     —     —     —     —     2,018,484 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Borrowings

  188,553   5,350,849   4,865,354   2,527,554   1,923,192   1,872,774   16,728,276 

Debt securities in issue

  —     1,821,902   1,226,153   2,241,586   1,916,987   3,512,194   10,718,822 

Lease payable

  —     18,890   59,829   107,638   68,788   145,722   400,867 

Other financial liabilities

  2,655,310   4,487,488   3,997   537   —     2,919   7,150,251 

Off balance sheet items:

       

Loan commitments

  62,151,698   —     —     —     —     —     62,151,698 

Financial guarantee contracts

  9,204,996   —     —     —     —     —     9,204,996 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total non-derivative financial instruments

 ¥167,158,881  ¥62,046,893  ¥17,936,776  ¥8,337,459  ¥4,413,375  ¥6,112,791  ¥266,006,175 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 ¥5,555,201  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥—    ¥5,555,201 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Notes:

1.

Embedded derivatives which are separately accounted for, but presented together with the host contract in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position are not included in the contractual tables above as they relate to the interest cash flow of the host contract, which are also not included in the tables above.

2.

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value. Except for items designated as hedging instruments for fair value andhedge, they are included in the column “On demand.” These instruments are not used for hedging under IAS 39 and the fair value represents the cash flow on demand.

Balance of loans and advances, and deposits at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020

The following table presents the balance of loans and advances, and deposits at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The balance of deposits, which was mainly composed of individual customer deposits at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, exceeded the balance of loans and advances at the same time due to the stable deposit base in Japan.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Loans and advances

  ¥85,129,070   ¥95,273,845   ¥97,714,938   ¥94,671,818 

Deposits

   128,461,527    130,295,290    155,493,654    138,431,418 

The following table presents a breakdown of deposits by domestic and foreign offices. Domestic inter-bank money wasis classified as “Call money and bills sold” and not included in “Deposits” in the consolidated statementstatements of financial position. Over half of domestic deposits wasis composed of individual customer deposits.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Domestic offices:

        

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

   ¥  20,370,064    ¥  18,737,973   ¥26,509,136   ¥23,804,054 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   49,580,166    48,879,089    63,810,233    56,650,510 

Deposits at notice

   855,978    1,066,201    732,564    779,514 

Time deposits

   18,185,591    22,269,409    17,833,960    17,759,453 

Negotiable certificates of deposit

   5,408,021    6,021,236    5,603,154    4,081,741 

Others

   7,338,619    7,290,869    8,578,530    7,198,447 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic offices

   101,738,439    104,264,777    123,067,577    110,273,719 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign offices:

        

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

   1,241,450    1,115,579    1,760,079    1,503,721 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   2,574,099    2,402,906    4,825,345    3,122,179 

Deposits at notice

   9,499,686    9,264,068    10,730,094    9,989,980 

Time deposits

   7,469,541    7,256,466    7,985,027    7,264,055 

Negotiable certificates of deposit

   5,812,264    5,859,702    6,967,464    6,098,695 

Others

   126,048    131,792    158,068    179,069 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign offices

   26,723,088    26,030,513    32,426,077    28,157,699 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

   ¥128,461,527    ¥130,295,290   ¥155,493,654   ¥138,431,418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Capital Management

The SMBC Group manages its capital by taking into consideration regulatory compliance and business development.

The SMBC Group’s capital management objectives are to maintain sufficient capital resources to meet the capital adequacy requirements and to maintain a strong capital base to support the development of its business.

External regulatory capital requirement

The SMBC Group, the Company and its principal banking subsidiaries in Japan rigidly abide by the capital adequacy guidelines set by the FSA in managing its capital.FSA. Japan’s capital adequacy guidelines are based on the Basel Capital Accord, which was proposed by the BCBS for uniform application to all banks which have international operations in industrialized countries. Japan’s capital adequacy guidelines may be different from

those of central banks or supervisory bodies of other countries because they have been designed by the FSA designed them to suit the Japanese banking environment. The SMBC Group’s banking subsidiaries outside of Japan are also subject to the local capital ratio requirements.

In December 2010, the BCBS published the new Basel III rules text to implement the Basel III framework, which sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a backstop to the risk-based requirement, measures to promote thebuild-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of two global liquidity standards. The main measures of the minimum capital requirements in the Basel III framework began onin January 1, 2013 and will behave been fully applied from January 1, 2019.

These capital reforms increase the The minimum common equity requirement, from 2% tothe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement and the total minimum capital requirement have been 4.5%, 6% and require8%, respectively since January 2015. Moreover, banks

have been required to hold a capital conservation buffer which started to be phased in from January 2016 with the initial ratio of 0.625% and will reach 2.5% by January 2019, to withstand future periods of stress bringingsince January 2019. As a result, taking the totalcapital conservation buffer into account, the minimum common equity requirement, to 7%. Thethe minimum Tier 1 capital requirement was also increased from 4% to 6%, resulting in aand the total requirement of 8.5% when combined with the above-mentioned conservation buffer. The totalminimum capital requirement remains at the existing level of 8% but will increase tohave been 7%, 8.5% and 10.5% by, respectively since January 2019 due to the capital conservation buffer.2019. Furthermore, a countercyclical buffer within a range of 0% to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital has been implemented according to national circumstances. The Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (the “GHOS”) also agreed on transitional arrangements for implementing the new requirements.

In addition to the above-mentioned minimum capital requirements and capital buffer requirements under Basel III, organizations identified by the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) as Global Systemically Important Banks(“G-SIBs”), which includes the SMBC Group, are required to maintain an additional 1% to 2.5%2% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets which is commonly referred to as theG-SIB capital surcharge, based on the organization’s size, interconnectedness, substitutability, complexity and cross-jurisdictional activity as determined by the FSB. The amount ofG-SIB capital surcharge that applies to the SMBC Group based on the FSB’s determination will beis 1%. The FSB updates its list of risk-weighted assets when the requirements are fully applied from 2019. Under thephase-inG-SIBs arrangement for theG-SIB capital surcharge, the SMBC Group is currently required to maintain 0.75% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.on an annual basis.

To reflect the Basel III framework, the FSA changed its capital adequacy guidelines. Under the FSA capital adequacy guidelines, the new capital requirements are being phased in from March 31, 2013 through March 31, 2019. The minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement, and Tier 1 capital requirement and total capital requirement have been 4.5%, 6% and 6%8%, respectively since March 2015. The capital conservation buffer, countercyclical buffer and theG-SIB capital surcharge started to be phased in from March 31, 2016 and have been fully applied from March 2019 under the FSA capital adequacy guidelines.

In accordance with the changes of the FSA capital adequacy guidelines, the SMBC Group changed its classification of capital into three tiers, referred to as Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital as follows:

Common Equity Tier 1 capital consists primarily of capital stock, capital surplus and retained earnings relating to common shares, andnon-controlling interests that meet the criteria for inclusion in Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

Additional Tier 1 capital consists primarily of preferred securities and perpetual subordinated bonds.

Tier 2 capital consists primarily of subordinated debt securities.

The capital adequacy guidelines permit Japanese banks to choose from the standardized approach, (“SA”), the foundation Internal Ratings-Basedinternal ratings-based (“IRB”) approach and the advanced IRB approach for credit risk, and the

basic indicator approach, (“BIA”), the standardized approach (“TSA”) and the Advanced Measurement Approachadvanced measurement approach (“AMA”) for operational risk. To be eligible to adopt the foundation IRB approach or the advanced IRB approach for credit risk, and TSA or AMA for operational risk, a Japanese bank must establish advanced risk management systems and receive prior approval from the FSA.

Adopting these approved approaches, the SMBC Group sets a target minimum total capital ratio of 8.0% on the SMBC Group’s consolidated basis, and both SMBC consolidated and nonconsolidated basis, and has complied with all externally imposed capital requirements throughout the period.

Failure of a Japanese bank, bank holding company or other financial institution to maintain the required risk-weighted capital ratios, may result in administrative actions or sanctions imposed by the FSA.

Regulatory capital

The table below presents the SMBC Group’s total capital ratio, total capital and risk-weighted assets under Japanese GAAP at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 based on the Basel III rules.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018 2017   2021 2020 
  (In billions, except percentages)   (In billions, except percentages) 

SMFG Consolidated:

      

Total risk-weighted capital ratio

   19.36 16.93   18.61 18.75

Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   16.69 14.07   16.96 16.63

Common Equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio

   14.50 12.17   16.00 15.55

Total capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital + Tier 2 capital)

  ¥12,304.1  ¥11,973.7   ¥12,289.3  ¥11,552.0 

Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital + Additional Tier 1 capital)

   10,610.2  9,946.2    11,199.3  10,249.9 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

   9,217.4  8,608.5    10,562.8  9,581.3 

Risk-weighted assets

   63,540.3  70,683.5    66,008.0  61,599.1 

The amount of minimum total capital requirements(1)

   5,083.2  5,654.7 

The amount of minimum total capital requirements(1)

   5,280.6  4,927.9 

 

(1)

The amount of minimum total capital requirements is calculated by multiplying risk-weighted assets by 8%.

 

4647

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Parties

The SMBC Group considers that its related parties include subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, key management personnel and close family members of key management personnel. Any transactions between the SMBC Group and its subsidiaries meet the definition of related-party transactions. However, because these transactions are eliminated on consolidation, they are not disclosed as related-party transactions. Transactions between the SMBC Group and its related parties are conducted on substantially the same terms as third-party transactions.

The transaction amounts included in the accounts, in aggregate, by category of related party were as follows:

Transactions with associates, joint ventures and other entities

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Assets:

        

Loans and advances

  ¥222,890   ¥219,680   ¥1,857,585   ¥1,693,161 

Others

   39,254    13,807    78,410    115,885 

Liabilities:

        

Deposits

  ¥267,289   ¥143,801   ¥192,010   ¥208,978 

Others

   29,049    46,486    74,907    116,015 

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2016    2021     2020     2019  
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Income statement:

      

Income statements:

      

Income (interest income, fee and commission income, and others)

  ¥15,665   ¥17,433   ¥34,135   ¥55,409   ¥68,752   ¥38,713 

Expense (interest expense and others)

   15,601    17,411    19,169    34,811    26,049    25,799 

Financial guarantees issued by the SMBC Group for its associates at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were ¥99,673¥349,323 million and ¥63,597¥330,366 million, respectively.

Loan commitments to associates and joint ventures at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were ¥125,015¥1,050,006 million and ¥173,492¥848,536 million, respectively.

Transactions with key management personnel and their close family members

Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the SMBC Group, directly or indirectly. The SMBC Group considers the members of the board of directors and corporate executive officers of SMFG to constitute key management personnel for the purpose of this disclosure required under IAS 24 “Related Party Disclosures.” Before SMFG transitioned to a company with three statutory committees on June 29, 2017, the SMBC Group considered the members of the board of directors of SMFG and SMBC to constitute the key management personnel.

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Assets:

        

Loans and advances

  ¥2   ¥29   ¥4   ¥—   

Liabilities:

        

Deposits

  ¥1,612   ¥2,878   ¥2,259   ¥2,078 

Others

   94    110    80    84 

Compensation of Key Management Personnel

The following table presents the compensation expenses of key management personnel.

 

   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (In millions) 

Short-term employee benefits

  ¥1,135   ¥    1,157   ¥    1,161 

Share-based compensation

   295    204    214 

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31,
 
   2021   2020   2019 
   (In millions) 

Short-term employee benefits

  ¥1,506   ¥1,206   ¥1,102 

Share-based compensation

   383    316    304 

The details of the share-based compensation plan are described in Note 3940 “Share-Based Payment.”

There were no post-employment benefits, other long-term benefits and termination benefits for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

 

4748

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

Principal Subsidiaries

The SMBC Group’s principal subsidiaries at March 31, 20182021 are shown in the list below. The SMBC Group consolidates all entities that the SMBC Group controls. The SMBC Group controls an entity when the SMBC Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.

Principal domestic subsidiaries

 

Company Name

  Proportion of
Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion of
Voting Rights(1)
 

Main Business

  Proportion of
Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proportion
of Voting
Rights(1)
   

Main Business

  (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)    

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation

   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking

SMBC Trust Bank Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Trust banking   100.0    100.0   Trust banking

SMBC Guarantee Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Credit guarantee   100.0    100.0   Credit guarantee

Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited

   60.0    60.0  Leasing

SMFL Capital Company, Limited

   100.0    100.0  Leasing

SMBC Nikko Securities Inc.

   100.0    100.0  Securities   100.0    100.0   Securities

Sumitomo Mitsui Card Company, Limited

   65.9    65.9  Credit card   100.0    100.0   Credit card

Cedyna Financial Corporation

   100.0    100.0  Credit card and consumer credit

SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0   Credit card, consumer credit and installment transaction

SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Consumer lending   100.0    100.0   Consumer lending

SMBC Mobit Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Consumer lending   100.0    100.0   Consumer lending

SMM Auto Finance, Inc.

   51.0    51.0  Automobile sales financing

SMBC Finance Service Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Collecting agent and factoring

The Japan Research Institute, Limited

   100.0    100.0  System development, data processing, management consulting and economic research   100.0    100.0   System development, data processing, management consulting and economic research

Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management
Company, Limited

   60.0    60.0  Investment advisory and investment trust management

SAKURA KCS Corporation

   47.4    47.4  System engineering and data processing

Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited

   50.1    50.1   Investment management, and investment advisory and agency

Alternative Investment Capital Limited

   60.0    60.0   Investment management and investment advisory

NCore Co., Ltd.

   51.0    51.0  Data processing service and consulting   51.0    51.0   Data processing service and consulting

SMBC Venture Capital Co., Ltd.

   40.0    40.0  Venture capital   40.0    40.0   Venture capital

SMBC Consulting Co., Ltd.

   100.0    100.0  Management consulting and information services   98.3    98.3   Management consulting and information services

Japan Pension Navigator Co., Ltd.

   69.7    69.7  Operational management of defined contribution pension plans   69.7    69.7   Operational management of defined contribution pension plans

 

(1)

Percentages of proportion of ownership interest and proportion of voting rights have been truncated.

Principal foreign subsidiaries

 

Company Name

  Country of
Incorporation
  Proportion of
Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proposition
of Voting
Rights(1)
   

Main Business

  Country of
Incorporation
  Proportion of
Ownership
Interest(1)
   Proposition
of Voting
Rights(1)
 

Main Business

     (%)   (%)         (%)   (%) 

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited

  U.K.   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking

SMBC Bank International plc

  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (China) Limited

  China   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  China   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

PT Bank BTPN Tbk

  Indonesia   98.4    93.5(2)  Commercial banking

SMBC Americas Holdings, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Bank holding company

Manufacturers Bank

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Banco Sumitomo Mitsui Brasileiro S.A

  Brazil   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Brazil   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

JSC Sumitomo Mitsui Rus Bank

  Russia   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Russia   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsui Indonesia

  Indonesia   98.4    98.4   Commercial banking

SMBC Bank EU AG

  Germany   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Malaysia Berhad

  Malaysia   100.0    100.0   Commercial banking  Malaysia   100.0    100.0  Commercial banking

SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Leasing  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Leasing

SMBC Aviation Capital Limited

  Ireland   90.0    90.0   Leasing

SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Securities  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Securities

SMBC Nikko Capital Markets Limited

  U.K.   100.0    100.0   Securities  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Securities

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc.

  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0   Derivatives  U.S.A.   100.0    100.0  Derivatives

TT International Asset Management Ltd

  U.K.   100.0    100.0  Investment management, and investment advisory and agency

 

(1)

Percentages of proportion of ownership interest and proportion of voting rights have been truncated.

(2)

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020, the Group disposed of 4.9% equity interest in PT Bank BTPN Tbk to a third party investor. The disposal was undertaken to ensure that PT Bank BTPN Tbk is compliant with the free float requirement under the Indonesia Stock Exchange’s Rule. The Group had also entered into a commercial arrangement where the economic exposure resulting from the disposal is being retained. Therefore, the disposal has not resulted in a decrease in the Group’s ownership interests.

SAKURA KCS Corporation and SMBC Venture Capital Co., Ltd. areis accounted for as subsidiaries, despite the SMBC Group’s holdings of less than 50% of the voting rights, because the SMBC Group is able to govern the financial and operating policies of these companiesthis company under a statute or an agreement, or by delegating the majority of the members of the board of directors.agreement.

The SMBC Group does not control some entities despite the fact that the SMBC Group holds more than 50% of their share capital, because the SMBC Group has entered into agreements with other investors to share or give those investors the power to govern the entities’ financial and operating policies over these investees.

Some of the SMBC Group’s subsidiaries may be subject to restrictions on the ability to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends or to repay loans or advances, which include capital adequacy requirements imposed by the governments and central banks, and the Companies Act of Japan restrictions relating to dividends. In addition, the SMBC Group pledges assets as collateral to secure payables under repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and securitizations, borrowings or for cash settlements, margins on derivative transactions and certain other purposes. The details of assets pledged are described in Note 3839 “Assets Pledged and Received as Collateral.”

 

4849

STRUCTURED ENTITIES

A structured entity is an entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity. It often has some or all of the following features or attributes:

 

restricted activities;

 

a narrow and well-defined objective;

 

insufficient equity to permit the structured entity to finance its activities without subordinated financial support; or

 

financing in the form of multiple contractually linked instruments to investors that create concentrations of credit or other risks (tranches).

During the normal course of business, the SMBC Group engages in numerous transactions involving structured entities. These structured entities are primarily used to provide the SMBC Group and its clients with efficient access to funds or investment opportunities, mainly through securitizations, investment funds and structured finance.

Consolidated Structured Entities

Structured entities are consolidated if they are controlled by the SMBC Group in accordance with the accounting policy as described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

The consolidated structured entities include asset backed commercial paper (“ABCP”) conduits which purchase financial assets such as trade accounts receivable and lease receivables by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The SMBC Group has contractual agreements to provide liquidity and credit enhancement facilities which can be utilized by those structured entities upon their request.

At March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the consolidated ABCP conduits had total assets of ¥807,780¥786,433 million and ¥1,017,221¥726,070 million, respectively. The total notional amounts of the liquidity and credit enhancement facilities provided by the SMBC Group to the consolidated ABCP conduits at March 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were ¥1,129,257¥1,226,930 million and ¥1,345,987¥1,275,529 million, respectively, allpart of which were undrawn.was drawn at March 31, 2020.

The SMBC Group did not provide any financial or other support, without having a contractual obligation to do so, to consolidated structured entities during the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

Unconsolidated Structured Entities

The following tables represent the carrying amounts of the SMBC Group’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities recognized in its consolidated statementstatements of financial position by line item and the maximum exposure to loss from its interests at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

  At March 31, 2018 
  Securitizations  Investment
funds
  Structured
finance
  Others  Total 
  (In millions) 

Interests in unconsolidated structured entities recognized in:

     

Trading assets

 ¥10,157  ¥68,639  ¥—    ¥—    ¥78,796 

Investment securities

  64,113   1,055,971   51,018   479   1,171,581 

Loans and advances

  1,921,725   —     5,202,253   400,549   7,524,527 

Assets held for sale

  32,755   —     81,494   —     114,249 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 ¥2,028,750  ¥1,124,610  ¥5,334,765  ¥401,028  ¥8,889,153 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss from interests in unconsolidated structured entities

 ¥2,925,137  ¥1,126,551  ¥6,296,368  ¥538,660  ¥10,886,716 
   At March 31, 2021 
   Securitizations   Investment
funds
   Structured
finance
   Others   Total 
   (In millions) 

Interests in unconsolidated structured entities recognized in:

          

Trading assets

  ¥14,447   ¥43,693   ¥—     ¥—     ¥58,140 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   260    1,115,719    126,210    —      1,242,189 

Investment securities

   98,430    36,477    —      337    135,244 

Loans and advances

   2,729,910    —      6,057,533    556,426    9,343,869 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  ¥2,843,047   ¥1,195,889   ¥6,183,743   ¥556,763   ¥10,779,442 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss from interests in unconsolidated structured entities

  ¥3,902,125   ¥1,197,191   ¥6,986,116   ¥710,918   ¥12,796,350 

 At March 31, 2017   At March 31, 2020 
 Securitizations Investment
funds
 Structured
finance
 Others Total   Securitizations   Investment
funds
   Structured
finance
   Others   Total 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Interests in unconsolidated structured entities recognized in:

               

Trading assets

 ¥—    ¥87,639  ¥—    ¥—    ¥87,639   ¥14,112   ¥53,490   ¥—     ¥—     ¥67,602 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   240    628,177    128,823    —      757,240 

Investment securities

 6,716  1,162,195  69,705  551  1,239,167    25,153    25,668    —      466    51,287 

Loans and advances

 1,919,703   —    5,092,321  501,180  7,513,204    2,608,076    —      5,741,542    672,306    9,021,924 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 ¥1,926,419  ¥1,249,834  ¥5,162,026  ¥501,731  ¥8,840,010   ¥2,647,581   ¥707,335   ¥5,870,365   ¥672,772   ¥9,898,053 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss from interests in unconsolidated structured entities

 ¥2,495,428  ¥1,251,497  ¥6,232,900  ¥702,236  ¥10,682,061   ¥3,208,568   ¥708,636   ¥6,699,939   ¥812,060   ¥11,429,203 

An interest in a structured entity refers to contractual andnon-contractual involvement that exposes the SMBC Group to variability of returns from the performance of the structured entity. Such interests include the holding of equity or debt instruments as well as the provision of loans, loan commitments and guarantees. Interest rate and currency derivatives that expose the SMBC Group mainly to market risk, or CDS that are designed to transfer risk from the SMBC Group to a structured entity are not regarded as an interest in a structured entity since they do not expose the SMBC Group to variability of returns from the performance of the structured entity. These derivatives are therefore not included in the tables above.

The maximum exposure to loss from the SMBC Group’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities represents the maximum amount of potential loss to which the SMBC Group is exposed through its involvement with unconsolidated structured entities. It is determined by the SMBC Group’s carrying amounts and the notional amounts of loan commitments and guarantees, without considering the probability of loss being incurred, or effects of collateral or other credit protection.

The SMBC Group did not provide any financial or other support, without having a contractual obligation to do so, to unconsolidated structured entities during the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

Securitizations

Structured entities for this product are established to securitize third-parties’ assets which mainly consist of auto loan receivables, residential and commercial mortgage loans and trade accounts receivables. These entities purchase those assets through loans or notes issued with multiple tranches. The SMBC Group provides loans and loan commitments to these entities or holds notes issued by them, in some cases with credit loss protection through guarantees or other credit enhancements provided by the sellers.

Investment Funds

These funds are established for providing investment opportunities to investors by pooling money from them and investing mainly in equity and debt instruments based on a predetermined investment policy. The SMBC Group has invested in a number of these funds.

Structured Finance

Structured entities for this product are typically established to raise funds for the development of infrastructure, the production of natural resources, the development or acquisition of real estate properties, and the purchase of certain equipment such as vessels or aircrafts for lease transactions. The SMBC Group provides financing to these entities mainly in the form of loans, loan commitments, or notes, which are typically secured by entities’ assets or cash flows generated primarily by entities’ projects.

Others

The SMBC Group provides financing to other types of structured entities such as third-party structured entities and repackaging vehicles to facilitate its clients’ funding requirements. The SMBC Group provides loans and loan commitments to these entities.

Sponsored Unconsolidated Structured Entities with No Interest Held by the SMBC Group

The SMBC Group sponsors certain structured entities in which it has no interest. The SMBC Group is deemed to be a sponsor of a structured entity when the SMBC Group takes a leading role in determining its purpose and design, while providing operational support to ensure its continued operation.

The income received from such sponsored unconsolidated structured entities was ¥23,901¥36,823 million and ¥16,085¥39,734 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The majority of the income was management fees included in “Fee and commission income” and was from investment funds managed by SMAM,SMDAM, the SMBC Group’s asset management subsidiary. The carrying amount of assets transferred to these entities, which mainly consisted of investment funds, was ¥1,640,396¥2,777,918 million and ¥1,479,572¥813,442 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

4950

ACQUISITIONS

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20182021

There were no material acquisitions that were accounted for as business combinations during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2020

American Railcar Leasing LLCDaiwa SB Investments Ltd. (currently merged into Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited)

On JuneApril 1, 2017,2019, Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited (“SMAM”), the SMBC Group, through SMBC Rail Services LLC,Group’s subsidiary, merged with Daiwa SB Investments Ltd. (“DSBI”), previously the Company’s railcar operating leasing subsidiary, acquired all membership interests of American Railcar Leasing LLCGroup’s associate, to form Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited (“ARL”SMDAM”). The Group’s equity interest in SMDAM resulting from the merger is 50.12%, one of the leading railcar leasing companies in the United States. The SMBC Group pursued this acquisition based on its expectation that the railcar leasing business in the United States will experience further growth and high profitability due to stable demand for rail freight transportation, whichas such, SMDAM is the core infrastructureGroup’s subsidiary. This merger was made for inland logistics. Through this acquisition, the SMBC Group aims to expand its railcar leasing businesspurpose of establishing an asset management company that combines the strengths and expertise of SMAM and DSBI, and offers high quality investment management performance and services by further enhancing its fleet portfolioin order to appropriately meet diverse needs of clients in a wide range of industries.properly address client needs.

The fair values of assets and liabilities of ARLDSBI at the date of acquisition and the consideration paid were as follows:

 

   At JuneApril 1, 20172019
(In millions)

Assets:(1)

Cash and deposits with banks

¥22,798

Intangible assets

20,078

Trading assets

14,019

All other assets

8,284

Total assets

¥65,179

Liabilities

¥18,038

Net assets

¥47,141

Non-controlling interests measured at their proportionate share of the identifiable net assets and others

(23,093

Net assets acquired

24,048

Goodwill

17,022

Consideration

¥41,070

Consideration:

Fair value of total consideration transferred

¥959

Fair value of the equity interest in DSBI held before the acquisition

40,111

Total

¥41,070

Acquisition related costs recognized as an expense in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement

¥9

(1)

The fair value of DSBI’s assets at the date of acquisition included the outstanding balance arising from the transactions made between the Group and DSBI, which included deposits with the Group amounting to ¥21 billion.

The fair value of consideration transferred represents the fair value of the reduction of the Group’s interest in SMAM. The Group’s interest in SMAM decreased from 51.19% to 50.12% and its interest in DSBI increased from 48.96% to 50.12% substantially as a result of a stock issuance from SMDAM to the shareholders of DSBI at the date of the business combination.

The goodwill was attributable to the profitability of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The Group recognized a profit of ¥21,998 million on this step acquisition, which was included in “Other income” in the consolidated income statements.

The revenue and profit or loss relating to DSBI since the acquisition date to March 31, 2020 is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries

The total amount of cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of subsidiaries during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were as follows:

For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2020
(In millions)

Cash consideration paid

¥(17,797

Cash and cash equivalents transferred as a result of the acquisitions

1,855

Cash consideration paid, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries

¥(15,942

The amounts of assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in these subsidiaries were ¥72,642 million and ¥21,330 million, respectively.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2019

PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk

On January 30, 2019, SMBC, the Group’s wholly owned subsidiary, acquired an additional share of PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk, previously an associate bank of SMBC in Indonesia. As a result of the acquisition, the Group increased its equity interest in PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk from 40.58% to 98.50% and obtained control of PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk. Subsequently, on February 1, 2019, PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk merged with PT Bank Sumitomo Mitsui Indonesia, a consolidated subsidiary of SMBC also in Indonesia, and the merged company changed its corporate name to PT Bank BTPN Tbk. This merger was made for the purpose of operating a full-fledged commercial banking business in Indonesia and further developing its franchise to offer broader financial services to its customers.

The fair values of assets and liabilities of BTPN at the date of acquisition and the consideration paid were as follows:

At January 30, 2019 
   (In millions) 

Assets:

  

Property, plantCash and equipmentdeposits with banks

  ¥304,257149,331

Loans and advances

522,918

Intangible assets

57,803 

All other assets

   15,719107,471 
  

 

 

 

Total assets

  ¥319,976837,523 
  

 

 

 

Liabilities:

  

BorrowingsDeposits

  ¥147,523538,529 

All other liabilities

   1,947104,817 
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  ¥149,470643,346

Net assets

194,177

Non-controlling interests measured at their proportionate share of the identifiable net assets and others

(9,494) 
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   170,506184,683 

Goodwill

   —  4,707 
  

 

 

 

Consideration

  ¥170,506189,390 
  

 

 

 

Consideration:

  

Cash

  ¥170,506111,365

Fair value of the equity interest in BTPN held before the acquisition

78,025 
  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥170,506189,390 
  

 

 

 

Acquisition related costs recognized as an expense in “General and administrative expenses”
in the consolidated income statement

  ¥1,264

The revenue and profit or loss since the acquisition date to March 31, 2018 and pro forma financial information relating to ARL are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

The amount of cash consideration paid relating to ARL, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired amounting to ¥9,644 million, was ¥160,862 million.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

GE Japan GK (currently SMFL Capital Company, Limited)

On April 1, 2016, SMFL acquired General Electric Company (“GE”) group’s leasing business in Japan by acquiring a 100% equity interest in GE Japan GK (“GE Japan”). The acquired leasing business is comprised mainly of equipment/asset leasing, small-ticket leasing, and automotive leasing. This acquisition was made for the purpose of upgrading the SMBC Group’s marketing strategies and sales capabilities by leveraging GE Japan’sknow-how developed under GE, and offering a wide range of financial solutions by enhancing the combined client base of SMFL and GE Japan.

The fair values of assets and liabilities of GE Japan at the date of acquisition and the consideration paid were as follows:

At April 1, 2016
(In millions)

Assets:

Loans and advances

¥        470,538

All other assets

203,069

Total assets

¥673,607

Liabilities:

Borrowings

¥436,537

All other liabilities

58,134

Total liabilities

¥494,671

Net assets

¥178,936

Non-controlling interests measured at their proportionate share of the identifiable net assets

(394

Net assets acquired

178,542

Goodwill

2,417

Consideration

¥180,959

Consideration:

Cash

¥180,959

Total

¥180,959

Acquisition related costs recognized as an expense in “General and administrative expenses”
in the consolidated income statement

¥752776 
  

 

 

 

The fair value of the financial assets acquired included ¥470,668¥522,918 million of loans and receivables to customers. advances.

The gross contractual amounts receivable were ¥488,335¥517,840 million, of which ¥21,692¥12,404 million were expected to be uncollectible.

The goodwill was attributable to the profitability of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

GE Japan’s net profit since the acquisition date to March 31, 2017 was ¥8,041 million.

Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited

On July 29, 2016, the SMBC Group acquired an additional 20% of the outstanding shares of Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited (“SMAM”) and increased its equity interest in SMAM to 60%. As a result, the SMBC Group obtained control of SMAM. This acquisition was made for the purpose of enhancing the SMBC Group’s services to comprehensively meet its clients’ needs for asset management.

The fair values of assets and liabilities of SMAM at the date of acquisition and the consideration paid were as follows:

At July 29, 2016
(In millions)

Assets:

Cash and deposits with banks

¥        15,411

Trading assets

12,030

Intangible assets

14,555

All other assets

11,007

Total assets

¥53,003

Liabilities

¥14,995

Net assets

¥38,008

Non-controlling interests measured at their proportionate share of the identifiable net assets

(15,203

Net assets acquired

22,805

Goodwill

38,053

Consideration

¥60,858

Consideration:

Cash

¥20,286

Fair value of the equity interest in SMAM held before the acquisition

40,572

Total

¥60,858

Acquisition related costs recognized as an expense in “General and administrative expenses”
in the consolidated income statement

¥8

The goodwill was attributable to the profitability of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

As a result of remeasuring the previously held interest to fair value, the SMBC Group recognized a gainloss of ¥20,344¥25,744 million on this step acquisition, which was included in “Other income”expenses” in the consolidated income statement.statements.

The revenue and profit or loss since the acquisition date to March 31, 2017 is2019 and pro forma financial information relating to PT Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Tbk are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

Pro forma financial information

It is estimated that the SMBC Group would have reported a total operating income of ¥3,358,377 million and a net profit of ¥741,214 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 if all acquisitions had occurred on April 1, 2016.

Cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries

The total amount of cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of subsidiaries during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were as follows:

 

   For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 20172019
 
   (In millions) 

Cash consideration paid

  ¥(201,245111,365

Cash and cash equivalents transferred as a result of the acquisitions

   1,889149,331 
  

 

 

 

Cash consideration paid, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries

  ¥(199,35637,966) 
  

 

 

 

The amounts of assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in these subsidiaries were ¥724,721¥688,192 million and ¥509,666 million, respectively.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Retail banking business of Citibank Japan Ltd.

On November 1, 2015, SMBC Trust Bank, the SMBC Group’s wholly owned subsidiary, acquired the retail banking business of Citibank Japan Ltd. (“Citibank Japan”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. SMBC Trust Bank allocated itsnon-voting stocks to Citibank Japan as consideration, and SMBC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, acquired them in cash. Through this acquisition, SMBC Trust Bank is expanding its business model to offer additional products and services, including foreign currency investment products and global services. This acquisition is expected to enable the SMBC Group to expand its customer base, enhance its foreign currency funding source and improve the service capability of the Group as a whole.

The fair values of assets and liabilities of the retail banking business of Citibank Japan at the date of acquisition and the consideration paid were as follows:

At November 1, 2015
(In millions)

Assets:

Cash and deposits with banks

¥2,296,107

All other assets

110,978

Total assets

¥2,407,085

Liabilities:

Deposits

¥2,361,908

All other liabilities

8,620

Total liabilities

¥        2,370,528

Net assets acquired

36,557

Goodwill

8,443

Consideration

¥45,000

Consideration:

Fair value of consideration transferred

¥45,000

Total

¥45,000

Acquisition related costs recognized as an expense in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated income statement

¥286

The goodwill was attributable to the profitability of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. The goodwill and other intangible assets of ¥40,683 million are deductible for income tax purposes.

The revenue and profit or loss since the acquisition date to March 31, 2016 and pro forma financial information relating to the retail banking business of Citibank Japan are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries and businesses

The total amount of cash consideration paid and cash acquired by obtaining control of subsidiaries and businesses during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were as follows:

For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2016
(In millions)

Cash consideration paid

¥(46,923

Cash and cash equivalents transferred as a result of the acquisitions

2,296,517

Cash consideration paid, net of cash and cash equivalents \acquired by obtaining control of the subsidiaries and businesses

¥        2,249,594

The amounts of assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in these subsidiaries and businesses were ¥175,263 million and ¥2,430,332¥643,346 million, respectively.

 

50ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE

The table below showsnon-current assets and disposal groups held for sale at March 31, 2018 and 2017.

   At March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (In millions) 

Assets held for sale:

   

Loans and advances(1)

  ¥3,010,314  ¥—   

Property, plant and equipment

   1,435,637   300 

Intangible assets

   179,358   —   

All other assets

   1,026,641   134,007 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   5,651,950(2)   134,307(3) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale:

   

Borrowings

   1,631,681   —   

Debt securities in issue

   1,422,402   —   

All other liabilities

   562,858   27,665 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥3,616,941(2)  ¥27,665(3) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The balance in Loans and advances mainly consists of lease financing.
(2)The assets and liabilities of SMFL were classified as held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
(3)The comparative amounts of “Assets held for sale” and “Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale” have been reclassified from “Other assets” and “Other liabilities”, respectively, to conform to the current presentation.

Other reserves relating tonon-current assets and disposal groups held for sale at March 31, 2018 and 2017 were ¥52,146 million and nil, respectively.

Reorganization of joint leasing partnership

On November 6, 2017, the SMBC Group announced that it had entered into a basic agreement with Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo Corp”) concerning the reorganization of its joint leasing partnership, subject to the approval of foreign and domestic regulatory authorities. The final agreement regarding the reorganization was concluded on March 30, 2018 and in this reorganization, the Company will reduce its equity interest in SMFL from 60% to 50% and Sumitomo Corp will increase its equity interest in SMFL from 40% to 50%. As a result, SMFL will cease to be the Company’s consolidated subsidiary and will become its joint venture.

Based on the facts and circumstances, the SMBC Group determined that the reorganization within one year is considered highly probable and therefore the assets and liabilities of SMFL were classified as held for sale during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

51

CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT DISTINCTION

The following tables present an analysis of financial assets and liabilities, excluding cash and deposits with banks, trading assets and liabilities, and derivative financial instruments, financial assets included in assets held for sale and financial liabilities included in liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale, by amounts recovered or settled, not more than twelve months or more than twelve months, at March 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

 

 At March 31, 2018   At March 31, 2021 
 Amounts recovered or settled     Amounts recovered or settled     
 Not more than
twelve months
 More than
twelve months
 Total   Not more than
twelve months
   More than
twelve months
   Total 
 (In millions)   (In millions) 

Assets:

         

Call loans and bills bought

 ¥1,802,317  ¥79,563  ¥1,881,880   ¥2,455,982   ¥97,486   ¥2,553,468 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

 8,418,341  73,362  8,491,703    11,666,696    71,376    11,738,072 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

 205,525  1,342,147  1,547,672    1,905    1,742,943    1,744,848 

Investment securities:

         

Held-to-maturity investments

 92,033  280,426  372,459 

Available-for-sale financial assets

 5,034,184  15,088,432  20,122,616 

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   36,133    35,882    72,015 

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   8,247,653    18,144,982    26,392,635 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   —      4,586,811    4,586,811 

Loans and advances

 29,469,067  55,660,003  85,129,070    35,544,062    62,170,876    97,714,938 

Other financial assets

 3,490,685  107,957  3,598,642    4,076,649    173,805    4,250,454 

Liabilities:

         

Deposits

 ¥123,901,761  ¥4,559,766  ¥128,461,527   ¥151,262,640   ¥4,231,014   ¥155,493,654 

Call money and bills sold

 1,190,929   —    1,190,929    1,368,515    —      1,368,515 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

 12,022,593   —    12,022,593    18,446,671    63,235    18,509,906 

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

   97,768    141,751    239,519 

Borrowings

 7,264,455  3,388,026  10,652,481    7,911,265    11,512,090    19,423,355 

Debt securities in issue

 3,356,401  7,212,716  10,569,117    3,533,310    7,695,290    11,228,600 

Other financial liabilities

 6,687,889  3,153  6,691,042    8,412,259    4,789    8,417,048 

  At March 31, 2017 
  Amounts recovered or settled    
  Not more than
twelve months
  More than
twelve months
  Total 
  (In millions) 

Assets:

   

Call loans and bills bought

 ¥1,824,730  ¥47,479  ¥1,872,209 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

  8,851,521   72,864   8,924,385 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

  —     1,599,093   1,599,093 

Investment securities:

   

Held-to-maturity investments

  792,357   381,062   1,173,419 

Available-for-sale financial assets

  2,042,240   15,858,278   17,900,518 

Loans and advances

  32,655,787   62,618,058   95,273,845 

Other financial assets

  3,307,191   117,400   3,424,591 

Liabilities:

   

Deposits

 ¥125,254,104  ¥5,041,186  ¥130,295,290 

Call money and bills sold

  2,083,701   4,319   2,088,020 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

  9,424,506   —     9,424,506 

Borrowings

  7,982,814   4,263,129   12,245,943 

Debt securities in issue

  4,628,884   6,536,739   11,165,623 

Other financial liabilities

  7,097,811   103,326   7,201,137 
   At March 31, 2020 
   Amounts recovered or settled     
   Not more than
twelve months
   More than
twelve months
   Total 
   (In millions) 

Assets:

      

Call loans and bills bought

  ¥854,548   ¥43,708   ¥898,256 

Reverse repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities borrowed

   13,676,260    69,736    13,745,996 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

   298,350    1,180,006    1,478,356 

Investment securities:

      

Debt instruments at amortized cost

   287,432    33,339    320,771 

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   5,578,741    12,475,423    18,054,164 

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

   —      3,489,451    3,489,451 

Loans and advances

   32,884,236    61,787,582    94,671,818 

Other financial assets

   4,109,546    120,132    4,229,678 

Liabilities:

      

Deposits

  ¥133,891,776   ¥4,539,642   ¥138,431,418 

Call money and bills sold

   3,740,540    —      3,740,540 

Repurchase agreements and cash collateral on securities lent

   15,455,782    —      15,455,782 

Borrowings

   10,482,673    6,638,689    17,121,362 

Debt securities in issue

   3,009,936    7,975,112    10,985,048 

Other financial liabilities

   7,146,795    3,456    7,150,251 

52

CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (SMFG)

Condensed StatementStatements of Financial Position

 

  At March 31,   At March 31, 
  2018   2017   2021   2020 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Assets:

        

Deposits with SMBC

  ¥251,681   ¥728,445   ¥221,993   ¥174,641 

Investments in SMBC

   4,613,844    4,613,844    4,613,790    4,613,790 

Loans to SMBC

   5,537,801    3,424,217    8,195,888    7,445,175 

Investments in other subsidiaries and associates

   1,548,012    1,547,319 

Investments in other subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

   1,785,519    1,733,095 

Other assets

   90,605    58,670    207,701    136,040 

Current tax assets

   67,414    87,571    4,380    127,542 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  ¥12,109,357   ¥10,460,066   ¥15,029,271   ¥14,230,283 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities and equity:

        

Short-term borrowings from SMBC

  ¥1,228,030   ¥1,228,030   ¥1,278,030   ¥1,228,030 

Long-term borrowings

   199,221    132,806    249,060    231,276 

Debt securities in issue due to other subsidiaries

   280,880    280,784    5,585    6,085 

Debt securities in issue

   4,216,292    2,821,356    6,778,540    6,013,305 

Other liabilities

   47,001    22,612    66,090    85,580 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

   5,971,424    4,485,588    8,377,305    7,564,276 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

   5,541,687    5,527,691    6,002,211    5,985,688 

Other equity instruments holders’ equity

   596,246    446,787    649,755    680,319 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total equity

   6,137,933    5,974,478    6,651,966    6,666,007 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

  ¥12,109,357   ¥10,460,066   ¥15,029,271   ¥14,230,283 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Condensed Income StatementStatements

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Income:

        

Interest income from SMBC

  ¥99,100  ¥52,938  ¥18,313   ¥170,777  ¥165,322  ¥145,075 

Dividends from SMBC

   223,334  408,419  522,636    272,952  637,703  325,333 

Dividends from other subsidiaries and associates

   33,668  20,428  20,508 

Dividends from other subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures

   31,914  21,726  46,473 

Fees and commission income from subsidiaries

   10,226  20,706  16,622    7,777  9,048  5,666 

Other income

   217  178  234    794  19  106,712 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total income

   366,545  502,669  578,313    484,214  833,818  629,259 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Expense:

        

Interest expense to SMBC

   4,298  4,474  5,753    4,313  4,328  4,298 

Interest expense to other subsidiaries

   16,309  13,039  12,780    4,320  14,502  13,663 

Interest expense

   89,699  45,223  12,814    154,298  148,177  128,360 

Operating and other expense

   21,525  12,165  9,868    31,806  22,812  24,857 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total expense

   131,831  74,901  41,215    194,737  189,819  171,178 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit before tax

       234,714      427,768      537,098    289,477  643,999  458,081 

Income tax expense

   (7,085 (33,344 4    (5,710 (6,416 (28,517
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net profit

  ¥241,799  ¥461,112  ¥537,094   ¥295,187  ¥650,415  ¥486,598 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit attributable to:

        

Shareholders

   232,077  453,183  534,321    282,065  638,051  474,723 

Other equity instruments holders

   9,722  7,929  2,773    13,122  12,364  11,875 

Condensed StatementStatements of Cash Flows

 

  For the fiscal year ended March 31,   For the fiscal year ended March 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2021 2020 2019 
  (In millions)   (In millions) 

Operating Activities:

        

Profit before tax

  ¥234,714  ¥427,768  ¥537,098   ¥289,477  ¥643,999  ¥458,081 

Income taxes paid—net

   35,010  23,427  (7,980   79,396  7,043  (17,440

Other operating activities—net

   (3,736 (4,580 (3,019   267,159  (3,023 (108,622
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities

   265,988  446,615  526,099    636,032  648,019  332,019 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Investing Activities:

        

Loans provided to SMBC

   (2,241,774 (1,972,253 (1,073,640   (750,713 (1,338,045 (626,746

Other investing activities—net

   (13,833 (5 (76

Investments in subsidiaries

   (7,418 (255,468  —   

Investments in associates and joint ventures(1)

   (52,849  —    (22,400

Proceeds from sale of investment in subsidiaries

   —     —    184,122 

Other investing activities—net(1)

   (46,282 (16,495 15,852 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities

   (2,255,607 (1,972,258 (1,073,716   (857,262 (1,610,008 (449,172
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financing Activities:

        

Net increase of short-term borrowings

   50,000   —     —   

Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings

   66,415  83,806  18,000    10,625  5,053  35,002 

Redemption of long-term borrowings

   —    (8,000  —   

Proceeds from issuance of debt securities

   1,525,271  1,738,267  754,274    921,603  1,255,939  591,744 

Proceeds from issuance of other equity instruments

   149,080  149,081  297,431    99,400  84,073   —   

Redemption of debt securities

   (403,025 (266,700  —   

Redemption of other equity instruments

   (130,000  —     —   

Dividends paid to shareholders

   (218,569 (211,501 (218,589   (267,119 (255,771 (245,595

Coupons paid to other equity instruments holders

   (9,722 (7,929 (2,773   (13,122 (12,364 (11,875

Purchases of treasury stock and proceeds from sale of treasury stock—net

   380  (86 (138   220  (99,605 (69,799
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities

   1,512,855  1,751,638  848,205    268,582  702,625  299,477 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase of cash and cash equivalents

   (476,764 225,995  300,588 

Net increase (decrease) of cash and cash equivalents

   47,352  (259,364 182,324 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   728,445  502,450  201,862    174,641  434,005  251,681 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  ¥251,681  ¥728,445  ¥502,450   ¥221,993  ¥174,641  ¥434,005 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

(1)

Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Investments in subsidiaries, associates and associatesjoint ventures

Investments in subsidiaries, associates and associatesjoint ventures are stated at cost. The Company recognizes dividend income from subsidiaries and associatesthese companies when its right to receive payment is established.

Investments in other subsidiaries, associates and associates includejoint ventures included equity investments in Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited, SMBC Nikko Securities Inc., SMFGSumitomo Mitsui Card & Credit, Inc.,Company, Limited, SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Limited and others at March 31, 2018, and(“SMDAM”), Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing Company, Limited SMBC Nikko Securities Inc., SMBC Friend Securities Co. Ltd., SMFG Card & Credit, Inc., SMBC Consumer Finance Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Company, Limited(“SMFL”) and others at March 31, 2017.2021 and 2020. These companies are incorporated in Japan, and the proportion of ownership interest of the Company in these companies was the same as described in Note 11 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures,” and Note 4748 “Principal Subsidiaries.”

Long-term obligations

The Company had perpetual subordinated bonds of ¥267 billion and ¥267 billion outstanding to its subsidiary, SMFG Preferred Capital JPY 3 Limited, at March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The interest rates of these bonds are fixed until January 2020, which range from 4.0% to 4.5% per annum, and will be floating thereafter. SMFG Preferred Capital JPY 3 Limited issued preferred securities to purchase these bonds.

Long-term obligations

The Company had subordinated long-term borrowings amounting to ¥49¥41 billion and ¥49¥41 billion at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and had unsubordinated long-term borrowings amounting to ¥150¥208 billion and to ¥84¥190 billion at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The Company also had subordinated bonds amounting to ¥945¥948 billion and ¥856¥969 billion, including ¥2 billion and ¥7¥0.3 billion outstanding to its subsidiary, at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and had senior bonds amounting to ¥3,285¥5,836 billion and ¥1,979¥5,050 billion, including ¥12¥4 billion and ¥7¥6 billion outstanding to its subsidiary, at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 1819 “Borrowings” and Note 1920 “Debt Securities in Issue.”

Guarantees

The Company provided guarantee of ¥298¥324 billion and ¥516¥254 billion at March 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, to the Deposit Protection Fund of the Association of German Banks with regard to the deposits of the SMBC Dusseldorf branch.branch and SMBC Bank EU AG.

 

F-144F-151