REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report ………………………………

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Company’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. ~~6,802,239~~10,103,839

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ___ No ~~xxx~~X

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 12 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes~~XXX~~_X_ No___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

For ease of reference, the following factors for converting metric measurements into imperial equivalents are provided:

Alteration –any change in the mineral composition of a rock brought about by physical or chemical means.

Andesite - A dark-colored, fine-grained extrusive rock that, when porphyritic, contains phenocrysts composed primarily of zoned sodic plagioclase and one or more of the mafic minerals.

Assaying- laboratory examination that determines the content or proportion of a specific metal (ie:silver) contained within a sample. Technique usually involves firing/smelting.

Biotite - a common rock-forming mineral in crystalline rocks, either as an original crystal in igneous rocks or as a metamorphic product in gneisses and schists.

Bornite – A copper ore found in hypogene and contact metamorphic deposits and mafic rocks.

Breccia - A rock in which angular fragments are surrounded by a mass of fine-grained minerals.

Bulk Sample – A collection of representative mineralized material whose location, geologic character and metal assay content can be determined and then used for metallurgical or geotechnical testing purposes.

Clastic - Fragments of minerals and rocks that have been moved individually from their places of origin.

Copper Oxide & Copper Sulphide -There are two major divisions of copper classes found in copper porphyry deposits - oxides and sulphides. Copper oxide, often referred to as "supergene", are the more highly concentrated material generally found at the top of a deposit. Copper sulphide, often referred to as "hypogene", is the copper mineralization generally found at the bottom of a deposit.

Core Samples- the cylindrical form of rock called “core” that is extracted from a diamond drill hole. Mineralized sections are separated and these samples are sent to a laboratory for analysis.

Diamond Drilling – a type of rotary drilling in which diamond bits are used as the rock-cutting tool to produce a recoverable drill core sample of rock for observation and analysis.

Dyke - A tabular igneous intrusion that cuts across the bedding or foliation of the country rock.

Exploration– work involved in searching for ore, usually by drilling or driving a drift.

Feasibility Study – is a definitive study of the viability of a mineral project by a qualified professional which defines: (1) mining methods, pit configuration, mine scheduling, mine equipment and all related costing, (2) method of mineral processing and all related plant, equipment and costing, (3) necessary determination of all infrastructure required and relevant costs and (4) all requirements of government and markets for mine operation. A definitive financial analysis of the mineral project taking into consideration all relevant factors, which will establish the presence of a Mineral Reserve and the details of its economic viability.

Felsic –an adjective describing an igneous rock having mostly light colored minerals and rich in silica, potassium and sodium.

Fire Assay - The assaying of metallic minerals by use of a miniature smelting procedure with various agents.

Galena - A lead and silver ore that occurs in hydrothermal veins and as replacement deposits in sedimentary rocks.

Geophysical Survey - A scientific method of prospecting that measures the physical properties of rock formations. Common properties investigated include magnetism, specific gravity, electrical conductivity and radioactivity.

Graben – A depressed crustal unit or block that is bounded by faults on its long sides.

Grade – The metal content of rock with precious metals, grade can be expressed as troy ounces or grams per tonne of rock.

Greywacke - a dark gray, firmly indurated, coarse-grained sandstone that consists of poorly sorted, angular to subangular grains of quartz and feldspar, with a variety of dark rock and mineral fragments embedded

Horst - An uplifted crustal unit or block that is bounded by faults on its long sides.

Induced Polarization (I.P.) - A type of geophysical survey where electrical current is passed through rock and the polarization is measured to estimate the content of metallic sulphide minerals.

Indurated - rock or soil hardened or consolidated by pressure, cementation, or heat.

Intrusion; Intrusive– molten rock that is intruded (injected) into spaces that are created by a combination of melting and displacement.

Lapilli - Pyroclastics that may be essential, accessory, or accidental in origin, of a size range that has been variously defined within the limits of 2 mm and 64 mm.

Mafic - Igneous rocks composed mostly of dark, iron-and magnesium-rich minerals.

Magnetite -An iron ore that occurs in banded iron formations and as an accessory mineral in many igneous rocks.

Marcasite - An iron pyrite that is bronze-yellow to white and is a supergene mineral from acid solutions.

Metallurgy– the study of the extractive processes which produce minerals from their host rocks.

Metallurgical Tests- are scientific examinations of rock/material to determine the optimum extraction of metal contained. Core samples from diamond drill holes are used as representative samples of the mineralization for this test work.

Mineral– a naturally formed chemical element or compound having a definitive chemical composition and, usually a characteristic crystal form.

Mineralization– a natural concentration in rocks or soil of one or more metalliferous minerals.

Net Smelter Return Royalty/ NSR Royalty –A phrase used to describe a royalty payment made by a producer of metals based on gross metal production from the property, less deduction of certain limited costs including smelting, refining, transportation and insurance costs.

Outcrop -An exposure of rock or mineral deposit that can be seen on surface.

Phenocryst - A term for large crystals or mineral grains floating in the matrix or groundmass of a porphyry.

Plagioclase -Any of a group of feldspars containing a mixture of sodium and calcium feldspars.

Plug - A vertical, pipelike body of magma that represents the conduit to a former volcanic vent.

Pluton - A body of igneous rock that formed beneath the surface by crystallization of magma.

Porphyritic - the texture of an igneous rock in which larger crystals (phenocrysts) are set in a finer-grained groundmass, which may be crystalline or glassy or both.

Porphyry - Any igneous rock in which relatively large crystals, are set in a fine-grained groundmass.

Prefeasability Study – is a comprehensive study of the viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where the mining method, in the case of underground mining, or the pit configuration, in the case of an open pit, has been established, and where an effective method of mineral processing had been determined. This Study must include a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptions of technical engineering, operating, and economic factors, which are sufficient for a Qualified Person acting reasonably, to determine if all or part of the Mineral Resource may be classified as a Mineral Reserve.

Pyrite- an iron sulphide mineral (FeS₂), the most common naturally occurring sulphide mineral.

Pyroclastic- Produced by explosive or aerial ejection of ash, fragments, and glassy material from a volcanic vent. Applied to the rocks and rock layers as well as to the textures so formed.

Quartz – crystalline silica; often forming veins in fractures and faults within older rocks.

Reclamation - Restoration of mined land to original contour, use, or condition.

Resource – a concentration of mineral material in such form and amount that economic extraction of a commodity from the concentration is currently or potentially feasible. Locations, grade, quality or quantity are estimated from specific geologic evidence.

Reverse Circulation Drilling (RC)– a drilling method used in geological appraisals whereby the drilling fluid passes inside the drill stem to a down-the-hole percussion bit and returns to the surface outside the drill stem carrying the drill chip samples.

Scoping Study - A scoping study is the first level of study that is performed on a mineral deposit to determine its economic viability. This is usually performed to determine whether the expense of a full pre-feasibility study and later full feasibility study is warranted.

Sedimentary - Formed by the deposition of sediment or pertaining to the process of sedimentation.

Sediments -Solid fragmental material that originates from weathering of rocks and is transported or deposited by air, water, or ice, or that accumulates by other natural agents, such as chemical precipitation from solution or secretion by organisms, and that forms in layers on the Earth's surface at ordinary temperatures in a loose, unconsolidated form; e.g., sand, gravel, silt, mud, alluvium.

Shale - A fine-grained sedimentary rock formed by the consolidation, particularly by compression, of clay, silt, or mud.

Silicified -The process of introducing silica into a non-siliceous rock, either by filling pore spaces or as a replacement of calcite in limestone.

Siltstone – An indurated silt having the texture and composition of shale but lacking its fine lamination or fissility; a massive mudstone in which the silt predominates over clay.

Sphalerite – A zinc sulphide that occurs with galena in veins and irregular replacement in limestone.

Stockwork - A mineral deposit consisting of a three-dimensional network of planar to irregular veinlets close enough that the entire mass can be mined.

Talus - Rock fragments derived from and lying at the base of a cliff or slope, or the accumulated mass of such loose broken rock.

Trenching - the process of exploration by which till is removed from a trench cut from the earth’s surface.

Vein– a thin, sheet-like, crosscutting body of hydrothermal mineralization, principally quartz.

Volcanics– those originally molten rocks, generally fine grained, that have reached or nearly reached the Earth’s surface before solidifying.

Wacke -A dirty sandstone that consists of a mixed variety of angular and unsorted or poorly sorted mineral and rock fragments, and of an abundant matrix of clay and fine silt.

Waste – barren rock in a mine, or mineralized material that is too low in grade to be mined and milled at a profit.

The Company’s auditor isfor the fiscal 2008 ended January 31, 2008 was Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, Chartered Accountants, Suite 900 - 4720 Kingsway, Burnaby , British Columbia, Canada, V5H 4N2. The Company’s prior auditor was Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Accountants, 1200 - 609 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7Y 1G6. There were no disagreements between the Company and Davidson & Company, ~~is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia and was appointed as auditors on November 29, 1999.~~LLP.

The Company’s legal advisor is William Schmidt of Hemsworth, Schmidt, Barristers and Solicitors, Suite 430, 580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3B6.

As used within this Annual Report, the terms “Pacific Booker”, “the Company”, “Issuer” and “Registrant” refer collectively to Pacific Booker Minerals Inc, its predecessors, subsidiaries and affiliates.

The selected financial data of the Company for Fiscal Year 2008 Ended January 31, 2008 was derived from the financial statements audited by Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, Chartered Accounts, as indicated by its audit reports which are included elsewhere in this annual report. The Financial Statements for the Years Ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005,~~2007 and ~~2004~~2006 were derived from the financial statements of the Company which ~~have been~~were audited by Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered ~~Accountants, as indicated in its audit reports which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.~~Accountants. The financial statements for the years ended January 31, ~~2003~~2005 and ~~2002~~2004 were also audited by Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Accountants, but are not included herein.

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common shares since incorporation and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain future earnings for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

Table No. 2 is derived from the financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the years presented with US GAAP, except as disclosed in Note 1715 to the financial statements.


	Year
	Ended					Year
	1/31/06	1/31/05	1/31/04	1/31/03	1/31/02	Ended
		(Restated)				1/31/08	1/31/07	1/31/06	1/31/05	1/31/04

Revenue	$0					$0
Net Income (Loss)	($8,883)	($903)	($327)	($302)	($64)	($2,222)	($1,365)	($8,883)	($903)	($327)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share	($1.41)	($0.16)	($0.06)		($0.02)	($0.23)	($0.17)	($1.41)	($0.16)	($0.06)
Dividends Per Share	$0					$0
Wtg. Avg. Shares (000)	6,320	5,714	5,087	4,694	4,114	9,497	8,142	6,320	5,714	5,087
Working Capital	$11	($456)	$166	$490	$5	$5,058	$3,748	$11	($456)	$166
Mineral Properties	$11,970	$18,072	$12,925	$11,932	$10,513	$17,625	$14,278	$11,970	$18,072	$12,925
Long-Term Debt	$1,500		$0			Nil		$1,500		$0
Shareholder’s Equity	$10,654	$16,207	$13,190	$12,523	$10,612	$22,838	$18,194	$10,654	$16,207	$13,190
Total Assets	$12,675	$18,945	$13,649	$12,865	$11,260	$23,455	$18,677	$12,675	$18,945	$13,649

US GAAP Net Loss	($2,640)	($6,087)	($1,360)	($1,759)	($1,877)	($5,569)	($3,712)	($2,640)	($1,575)	($1,360)
US GAAP Loss Per Share	($0.42)	($1.07)	($0.27)	($0.37)	($0.46)	($0.59)	($0.46)	($0.42)	($0.28)	($0.27)
US GAAP Wtg. Avg. Shares	6,320	5,714	5,087	4,694	4,114	9,497	8,142	6,320	5,714	5,087
US GAAP Equity	($1,135)	($1,865)	$264	$591	$99	$9,905	$8,608	$3,376	$2,647	$264
US GAAP Total Assets	$885	$872	$724	$933	$747	$10,523	$9,091	$5,397	$5,385	$724
US GAAP Mineral Properties	$180	$0				$4,693			$4,512	$140

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian Dollars (CDN$). The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar (US$).

Table No. 3 sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian Dollar at the end of the five most recent years ended December 31^st, the average rates for the period, and the range of high and low rates for the period. Table No. 3 also sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian Dollar at the end of the six most recent months, and the range of high and low rates for these periods.

For purposes of this table, the rate of exchange means the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The table sets forth the number of U.S. dollars required under that formula to buy one Canadian Dollar. The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

Certain Statements presented herein are forward-looking statements which may include conclusions of prefeasibility and feasibility studies, estimates of future production, capital and operating costs, prices of silver and gold and other known and unknown risks. These and other factors and uncertainties may cause material differences from future results as expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include but are not limited to the risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business.

An investment in the Common Shares of the Company must be considered speculative due to the nature of the Company’s business and the present stage of exploration and development of its non producing mineral properties. In particular, the following risk factors apply:

The Company is Involved in the Resource Industry which is Highly Speculative and has Certain Inherent Exploration Risks which Could have an Negative Effect on the Company

Resource exploration is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production. The marketability of minerals acquired or discovered by the Company may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment, and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, and environment protection, the combination of which factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on investment ca pital.

All of the Company’s Mineral Properties are at the Exploration Stage and all of the Company’s Exploration Expenditures May Be Lost

The Company is at the exploration stage on all of its properties and substantial additional work will be required in order to determine if any economic deposits occur on the Company’s properties. Mineral Exploration is highly risky, and most exploration properties do not contain any economic deposits of minerals. If a property is determined to not contain any economic reserves of minerals, the entire amount spent on exploration will be lost.

The Company Has No Known Reserves and No Economic Reserves May Exist on Its Properties

Despite exploration work on its mineral claims, no known bodies of commercial ore or economic deposits have been established on any of the Company’s mineral properties. Finding mineral deposits is dependent on a number of factors, not the least of which is the technical skill of exploration personnel involved. Even in the event commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, the exploration properties might not be brought into a state of commercial production. The commercial viability of a mineral deposit once discovered is also dependent on a number of factors, some of which are particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices. Most of these factors are beyond the control of the entity conducting such mineral exploration. The Company is an exploration stage company with no history of pre-tax profit and no income from its operations. Even if the Comp any’s properties are brought into production, operations my not be profitable.

The Company Has Not Surveyed Any of Its Properties and the Company Could Lose Title to Its Properties

The Company has only done a preliminary legal survey of the boundaries of any of these properties, and therefore, in accordance with the laws of the jurisdictions in which these properties are situated, their existence and area could be in doubt. The Company has not obtained formal title reports on any of its properties and title may be in doubt. If title is disputed, the Company will have to defend its ownership through the courts. In the event of an adverse judgment, the Company would lose its property rights.

The Company will be required to compete in the future directly with other corporations that may have greater resources. Such corporations could outbid the Company for potential projects or produce minerals at lower costs which would have a negative effect on the Company’s operations.

Mineral Operations are Subject to Market Forces Outside of the Company’s Control

The marketability of minerals is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the entity involved in their mining and processing. These factors include market fluctuations, government regulations relating to prices, taxes royalties, allowable production, import, exports and supply and demand. One or more of these risk elements could have an impact on costs of an operation and if significant enough, reduce the profitability of the operation and threaten its continuation.

The Company’s exploration operations are affected to varying degrees by government regulations relating to resource operations, the acquisition of land, pollution control and environmental protection, safety, production and expropriation of property. Changes in these regulations or in their application are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its operations, business and results of operations. Failure to comply with the conditions set out in any permit or failure to comply with the applicable statutes and regulations may result in orders to cease or curtail operations or to install additional equipment. The Company may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of its operating or exploration activities. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange cont rols, income taxes, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine safety.

Currently, the Company’s Canadian properties are subject to the jurisdiction of the federal laws of Canada and the provincial laws of British Columbia.

On the Federal and Provincial level, the Company must comply with exploration permitting requirements which require sound operating and reclamation plans to be approved by the applicable government body prior to the start of exploration. Depending upon the type and extent of the exploration activities, the Company may be required to post reclamation bonds and/or assurances that the affected areas will be reclaimed. If the reclamation requires funds in addition to those already allocated, the Company could be forced to pay for the extra work and it could have a significant negative effect upon the Company’s financial position and operations.

In connection with its operations and properties, the Company is subject to extensive and changing environmental legislation, regulation and actions. The Company cannot predict what environmental legislation, regulation or policy will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards and this trend is likely to continue in the future. The recent trend includes, without limitation, laws and regulations relating to air and water quality, mine reclamation, waste handling and disposal, the protection of certain species and the preservation of certain lands. These regulations may require obtaining permits or other authorizations for certain activities. These laws and regulations may also limit or prohibit activities on certain lands lying within wetland areas, area providing for habitat for certain species or other protected areas. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may necessitate significant capital outlays, may materially affect the Company’s results of operations and business, or may cause material changes or delays in the Company’s intended activities.

Currently, the Company has $118,600 on deposit as a reclamation bond for exploration work and site disturbance at the Morrison property. These allocated funds have been deposited for the benefit of the Province of British Columbia until released upon approval from the Province after all necessary reclamation work on the property has been performed. If the reclamation is more prolonged and requires funds in addition to those already allocated, Pacific Booker could be forced to pay for the extra work and it could have a significant negative impact upon the Company’s financial position and operations.

The Company is Likely to Require Additional Financing which Could Result in Substantial Dilution to Existing Shareholders

The Company, while engaged in the business of exploiting mineral properties, has sufficient funds to undertake its planned current exploration projects. The Company is currently preparing a Full Feasibility Study at its Morrison project which may require additional financing to complete. The Company has also entered into a purchase agreement with Falconbridge for acquisition of a 100% interest in the Morrison property which will require additional financing of $1,500,000 to meet the remaining obligations under the agreement. If the Feasibility Study is positive, ~~and the acquisition of a 100% interest is completed,~~ the Company will require further financing to develop the Morrison project and to place it into commercial production. The exploration of the Company’s mineral properties is, therefore, dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through the joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity ~~fin ancing~~financing or other means. Such sources of financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to obtain such financing may result in delay or indefinite postponement of exploration work on the Company’s mineral properties, as well as the possible loss of such ~~properties.~~propert ies. Any transaction involving the issuance of previously authorized but unissued shares of common or preferred stock, or securities convertible into common stock, could result in dilution, possibly substantial, to present and prospective holders of common stock. These financings may be on terms less favorable to the Company than those obtained previously.

The Company Has a History of Net Losses and Expects Losses to Continue for the Foreseeable Future

The Company has had a history of losses and there is no assurance that it can reach profitability in the future. The Company will require significant additional funding to meet its business objectives. Capital will need to be available to help maintain and to expand work on the Company’s Morrison Property. The Company may not be able to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms, or at all. If equity financing is required, as expected, then such financings could result in significant dilution to existing shareholders. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient financing, the Company might have to dramatically slow exploration efforts and/or lose control of its projects. The Company has historically obtained the preponderance of its financing through the issuance of equity ~~there is no limit to the number of authorized common shares,~~ and the Company has no current plans to obtain financing through means other than equity financing.

The Company has a ~~Current~~ Deficit and a Lack of Cash Flow to Sustain Operations and Does Not Expect to Begin Receiving Operating Revenue in the Foreseeable Future

As of January 31, ~~2006,~~2008, the end of the Company’s most recent fiscal year, the Company had a ~~current~~ deficit of ~~$13,738,189.~~$17,325,760. None of the Company’s properties have advanced to the commercial production stage and the Company has no history of earnings or cash flow from operations. The Company has paid no dividends on its shares since incorporation and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. Historically, the only source of funds available to the company has been through the sale of its common ~~shares and convertible debt instruments.~~shares. Any future additional equity financing would cause dilution to current stockholders. If the Company does not have sufficient capital for its operations, management would be forced to reduce or discontinue its activities which would likely have a negative effect on the stock price.

The Market for the Company’s Stock has Been Subject to Volume and Price Volatility which Could Negatively Effect a Shareholder’s Ability to Buy or Sell the Company’s Shares

The market for the common shares of the Company may be highly volatile for reasons both related to the performance of the Company or events pertaining to the industry (ie, mineral price fluctuation/high production costs/accidents) as well as factors unrelated to the Company or its industry. In particular, market demand for products incorporating minerals in their manufacture fluctuates from one business cycle to the next, resulting in change of demand for the mineral and an attendant change in the price for the mineral. The Company’s common shares can be expected to be subject to volatility in both price and volume arising from market expectations, announcements and press releases regarding the Company’s business, and changes in estimates and evaluations by securities analysts or other events or factors. In recent years the securities markets in the United States and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly small-capitalization companies such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operations, performances, underlying asset values, or prospects of such companies. For these reasons, the shares of the Company’s common shares can also be expected to be subject to volatility resulting from purely market forces over which the Company will have no control. Further, despite the existence of a market for trading the Company’s common shares in Canada, stockholders of the Company may be unable to sell significant quantities of common shares in the public trading markets without a significant reduction in the price of the stock.

Certain of the directors and officers of the Company are also directors and/or officers and/or shareholders of other natural resource companies. While the Company was engaged in the business of exploiting mineral properties, such associations may have given rise to conflicts of interest from time to time. The Directors of the Company are required by law to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company and to disclose any interest that they may have in any project or opportunity of the Company. If a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the board of directors, any director in a conflict must disclose his interest and abstain from voting on such matter. In determining whether or not the Company will participate in any project or opportunity, the directors will primarily consider the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and its financial position at the time.

The Company Could be Deemed a Passive Foreign Investment Company Which Could have Negative Consequences for U.S. Investors

The Company could be classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) under the United States tax code. If the Company is declared a PFIC, then owners of the Company’s Common Stock who are U.S. taxpayers generally will be required to treat any so-called "excess distribution" received on its common shares, or any gain realized upon a disposition of common shares, as ordinary income and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such distribution or gain, unless the taxpayer makes a qualified electing fund ("QEF") election or a mark-to-market election with respect to the Company’s shares. A U.S. taxpayer who makes a QEF election generally must report on a current basis its share of the Company’s net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which the Company is classified as a PFIC, whether or not the Company distributes any amounts to its shareholders.

U.S. Investors May Not Be Able to Enforce Their Civil Liabilities Against The Company or Its Directors, Controlling Persons and Officers

It may be difficult to bring and enforce suits against the Company. The Company is a corporation incorporated in Canada under the laws of British Columbia. The majority of the Company’s directors and officers are residents of Canada and all of the Company’s assets and its subsidiaries are located outside of the United States. Consequently, it may be difficult for United States investors to effect service of process in the United States upon those directors or officers who are not residents of the United States, or to realize in the United States upon judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities under United States securities laws. There is substantial doubt whether an original action could be brought successfully in Canada against any of such persons or the Company predicated solely upon such civil liabilities under the U.S. Securities Act.

~~Broker-Dealers May Be Discouraged From Effecting Transactions In Our Common Shares Because They Are Considered Penny Stocks And Are Subject To The Penny Stock Rules~~

Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on NASD broker-dealers who make a market in "a penny stock". A penny stock generally includes any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our shares, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the shares and impede the sale of our shares in the secondary market.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or "accredited investor" (generally, an individual with net worth in excess of US$1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding US$200,000, or US$300,000 together with his or her spouse) must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt.

In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the US Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

As a “Foreign Private Issuer”, the Company is Exempt From the Section 14 Proxy Rules and Section 16 of the 1934 Securities Act

The submission of proxy and annual meeting of shareholder information (prepared to Canadian standards) on Form 6-K may result is shareholders having less complete and timely data. The exemption from Section 16 rules regarding sales of common shares by insiders may result in shareholders having less data.

The Contact persons in Vancouver are Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer, and John Plourde, Director.

The Company currently leases its executive offices in Vancouver The lease covers approximately 1,966 square feet and runs through ~~July 31,~~April 30, 2009. The terms of rent are as follows:

The premises are considered adequate for the Company’s needs for the foreseeable future.

The Company's common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol "BKM", and on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “PBM”.

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of 100,000,000 common shares without par value. As of January 31, ~~2006,~~2008, the end of the most recent fiscal year, there were ~~6,802,239~~10,103,839 common shares issued and outstanding.

The Company was originally incorporated under theCompany Act of British Columbia under the name of Booker Gold Explorations Ltd. on February 18, 1983. On February 8, 2000, the Company conducted a 1 for 5 reverse split and changed its name to Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. At the Company’s Annual General Meeting held on July 16, 2004, shareholder’s approved new Articles of Incorporation under the new British ColumbiaBusiness Corporations Act which replaced theCompany Act of British Columbia.

Currently, the Company conducts all of its operations Canada and all of its assets are located in Canada.

Since inception, the Company has been involved in mineral exploration. The majority of the Company’s efforts since inception have been conducted on properties in Canada, particularly the Morrison and Hearne Hill copper/gold properties. The Company originally entered into an option agreement to earn a 100% interest in the Hearne Hill property in December, 1992, subject to a 4% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”). The Company ~~has~~ met the option requirements until December 2004 and currently has a 100% interest in Hearne Hill, subject to the 4% NSR. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company wrote-off the entire capitalized value of the Hearne Hill property which totaled $7,851,288.

In October 1997, the Company optioned the adjacent Morrison Property from Noranda (now Falconbridge Ltd., a unit of Xstrata Plc.). The Noranda option agreement ~~allows~~allowed the Company to earn a 50% interest in the Morrison Property upon the expenditure of $2,600,000 on exploration over five years and delivery of a bankable feasibility study. If Noranda ~~decides~~decided not to proceed with development of the Morrison Property, the Company ~~can~~could acquire a 100% interest (subject to a 3% NSR) in the property. The Company ~~has~~ met the expenditure requirement under the Noranda agreement.

In April 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a purchase agreement with Noranda on the Morrison property whereby Pacific Booker can acquire a 100% interest in the property by paying Noranda $3,500,000 cash over 36 months and issuing to Noranda 250,000 common shares and 250,000 warrants, as well as 250,000 additional common shares upon commencement of commercial production. The ~~Company is current in its obligations~~Company’s final cash payment of $1,500,000 was due to Falconbridge Ltd., the successor company to Noranda, ~~and the final cash payment of $1,500,000 under the agreement is due~~ on or before April 17, 2007. In September 2006, the final cash payment was made to Falconbridge, less a $50,000 discount for early payment.

Since the acquisition of the Hearne Hill/Morrison project in 1992, the Company has concentrated its efforts on exploring the project and initiated a Full Feasibility Study on the Morrison project in January 2004.

In 1995, the Company acquired 100% interests in the Copper and CUB mineral claims located near the Hearne Hill/Morrison project. During the year ended January 31, 2005, management decided not to continue with exploration on the claims and the value of the Copper and CUB claims were written off.

~~In 1999,~~On August 7, 2007, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the Bingo mineral exploration project in Argentina and signed a letter of intent with Sun State Resources who can earn a 75% interest in the project by incurring $230,000 in exploration costs before June 8, 2004 and issuing 100,000Company’s common shares tobegan trading on the ~~Company before June 8, 2002. Sun State did not issue~~American Stock Exchange under the required shares and has not earned an interest in the Bingo property. During Fiscal 2004, management decided to not continue with the Bingo claims; Therefore, during the year, the acquisition and deferred exploration costs were written off.symbol “PBM”.

All of the Company’s mineral operations are located in Canada. The Company and all of its properties are at the exploration stage. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit is present on any of the Company’s properties, and additional exploration is required before it is determined if any property is economically and legally viable.

Operations are not seasonal as the Company can conduct certain types of exploration at its properties year-round. To date, the Company’s revenue has been limited to interest on its cash balances and therefore it is not currently dependent upon market prices for its operations, nor is it dependent upon any patents, licenses or manufacturing processes. The Company’s operations are dependent upon mining exploration rights and claims as well as the terms of option and/or joint venture agreements on those properties. Please see the individual property descriptions below for the details of each of the Company’s mineral exploration projects.

The mineral exploration operations of the Company are subject to regulation by several government agencies at the Federal, Provincial and local levels. These regulations are well documented and a fundamental aspect of operations for any resource company in Canada. Management believes it is in compliance with all current requirements and does not anticipate any significant changes to these regulations which will have a material effect on the Company’s operations.

The Company currently operates in the mineral exploration sector. All of the Company’s properties are located in British Columbia, Canada and are at the exploration stage. Currently, the Company’s only active project is the Morrison project in British Columbia. The individual mineral properties are described below.

The ~~Hearne Hill/~~Morrison ~~Project consists of two adjacent properties, Hearne Hill and Morrison. The~~ Project is a copper/gold exploration project and, ~~cover~~including the adjacent Hearne Hill project, covers an area of approximately 65 square kilometers in British Columbia, Canada. ~~The Company has a 100% interest in the Hearne Hill property, subject to a 4% NSR, while~~ Morrison is subject to a purchase agreement between the Company and Falconbridge, a unit of Xstrata Plc., where the Company can acquire a 100% interest in the Morrison property. Under the acquisition agreement, the Company has made all the required cash payments to Falconbridge, and is only required to issue Falconbridge 250,000 additional common shares upon commencement of commercial production.

The project is at the exploration stage and does not contain proven mineral ~~reserves.~~reserves, but is currently undergoing a Full Feasibility Study.

The project is located in the Omineca District approximately 65 kilometers northeast of the town of Smithers in the Babine Lake region of north-central portion of British Columbia, Canada. The project lies 30 kilometers north of the town of Granisle which was originally built to service several mines in the area. Access is via paved British Columbia Provincial Highway 321 from Topley to Granisle to Michelle Bay, then by barge across Babine Lake to Nosebay. A network of logging roads provides access to the Morrison Project approximately 38 kilometers from the barge landing.

The Morrison Property is represented by the Erin #1 mineral claim which is covered under theMineral Tenure Act of British Columbia (“Mineral Tenure Act”). The Company is acquiring the Morrison Property from Falconbridge isLtd, and has completed all the ~~100% beneficial owner~~required cash payments under the agreement and must issue an additional 250,000 common shares to Falconbridge upon commencement of ~~this claim, and the Company has an agreement with Falconbridge whereupon it may acquire Falconbridge’s interest in the claim.~~commercial production. The Claim is 500 hectares in size is in good standing until ~~November 21, 2007.~~

~~The Hearne Hill property is represented by various mineral claims covered by the~~~~Mineral Tenure Act~~ ~~which were acquired from Arms-length individuals.~~September 15, 2016.

The Company does not believe there are any conflicting claims of ownership on any of the underlying claims. Copies of the acquisition agreements, including a list of the various claims underlying the property, have been filed as exhibits to the Company 20-F Registration Statement. A list of the Company’s claims is also available on-line at the British Columbia Government’s Mineral Titles Online database located at www.mtonline.gov.bc.ca.

Under theMineral Tenure Act, claim holders may apply for additional 20 year terms as long as the extension is required for mining purposes. Annual rental fees payable to British Columbia is $10 per hectare.

Under the purchase agreement with Noranda (now Falconbridge) dated April 19, 2004, Noranda indicated that to the best of its knowledge, there is no claim or challenge to its ownership or title to the mineral claims by any other party. A copy of that agreement was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s 20-F Registration Statement.

Although the project lies within the traditional Lake Babine First Nations region, the project area is not under any native claim, nor is any claim anticipated based upon currently available information. The Company has endeavored to appraise the Lake Babine First Nations on its planning and results of its studies, including environmental, wildlife, and fish studies.

The Hearne Hill property was originally acquired by the Company in 1992. The Company agreed to purchase a 100% interest in the Hearne Hill claims from three arms-length individuals under the following terms:

~~Issuance of 40,000 common shares in 4 tranches of 10,000 shares each as certain milestones were met.~~

All option payments have been made and all the common shares have been issued. The Company currently has a 100% interest in the property, subject to a 4% NSR to the vendors and required royalty payments of $100,000 per year. The annual royalty payments may offset any net smelter royalty obligations, and the NSR may be purchased by the Company for a cash payment of $2,000,000 at any time. Subsequent to the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company was named in an action filed with the British Columbia Supreme Court by Lorne Spence, one of the original optionors of the Hearne Hill property. Mr. Spence’s action seeks the return of certain mineral claims, or unspecified damages in the alternative. The Company is vigorously defending the action and has filed a Statement of Defense and a Counterclaim against Mr. Spence.

~~On the Morrison property, the~~ Company originally signed an agreement with Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc. (“Noranda”) dated October 22, ~~1997.~~1997 regarding the underlying claims. Under the agreement, Pacific Booker can earn a 50% interest in the Morrison claims by spending $2,600,000 over a period of five years and delivery of a bankable feasibility study by October 31, 2003. If Pacific Booker has met the expenditure requirement, Noranda may, under the agreement and upon receipt of a written request from Pacific Booker, extend the date for completion and delivery of the bankable feasibility study for up to an additional two years. The agreement with Noranda also allowed the Company to recover from Noranda 15% of its total exploration expenditures on the Morrison Property in order to offset additional overhead and administration costs associated with financing and administration of the exploration program.

In April 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a new purchase agreement with Noranda Inc. (now Falconbridge Inc., a unit of Xstrata Plc.) regarding the Morrison Property which would replace the original agreement signed in October 1997 as described above. Under the agreement, the Company would acquire a 100% interest in the project from Noranda in exchange for the payment of $3,500,000 cash and issuance of 250,000 common shares and 250,000 common share purchase warrants under the following schedule:

~~In addition to the cash payments, the Company issued Noranda 250,000 common shares and 250,000 warrants exercisable until June 5, 2006 at an exercise price of $4.05.~~

~~During 2005, Noranda amalgamated with Falconbridge and continued as Falconbridge Limited. There was no change to the Company’s agreement with Noranda/Falconbridge as a result of Noranda’s merger.~~

Upon Commencement of any commercial production from the property, the Company must issue to Falconbridge an additional 250,000 common shares. If at the time of issuance the Company’s common share price is below $4.00 per share, the Company is obligated to pay, in cash, the difference between $1,000,000 and the value of the 250,000 common shares issued. This amount is figured by the average trading price which is less than $4.00 per share multiplied by 250,000 common shares.

If the Company is unable to comply with the terms of the above agreement, it will be required to execute a re-transfer of its interest in the project to Falconbridge which would result in Falconbridge holding a 100% interest in the Morrison claims.

The final cash payment of $1,500,000 was due to Falconbridge on or before April 19, 2007. In September 2006, the Company satisfied this payment by paying Falconbridge $1,450,000 after negotiating a $50,000 early payment discount. In addition to the cash payments, the Company issued 250,000 common shares and 250,000 warrants exercisable until June 5, 2006 at an exercise price of $4.05.

During 2005, Noranda amalgamated with Falconbridge and continued as Falconbridge Limited. In August 2006, Falconbridge was acquired by Xstrata Plc. There were no changes to the Company’s agreement with Noranda/Falconbridge as a result of either merger

The properties are situated on the northern edge of the Skeena Arch in a region underlain by volcanic, clastic and epiclastic rocks. This sequence of rocks has been cut by a northwest trending series of faults that have created a long linear sequence of horsts and grabens. The rocks have been intruded by a variety of intermediate to felsic stocks, plugs and dykes of Eocene age.

During the Tertiary-Eocene period, Biotite Feldspar Porphyry (“BFP”) plugs and stocks of the Babine Igneous Suite were emplaced along major faults in a continental magmatic arc. Porphyry copper deposits in the area are temporally and spatially associated with the Babine Igneous Suite intrusions.

The property is underlain by volcanic rocks of the Lower to Middle Jurassic Hazelton Group rocks which are intruded by porphyritic rocks in a series of northeasterly trending dykes. The intrusive composition is that of diorite or quartz diorite. Several phases of intrusions are known, including some post mineral dykes.

Chalcopyrite, bornite and molybdenite occur as fracture fillings and disseminations in the biotite feldspar porphyry and the surrounding wallrock. The mineralization is due to a large porphyry copper system. The erratic nature of the copper distribution is caused by late stage intrusions. The volcanic rocks, in contrast to the late stage BFP, are higher in grade.

There are two known bodies of mineralized breccia. The southern body, known as the Chapman zone, has been known for several years, and the northern body, known as the Peter Bland zone, was found by Pacific Booker during its 1995 drill program. These are dilational zones of brecciation which are surrounded by areas of fracturing which carry high grade mineralization. Gold is enriched in the breccia relative to the stockwork mineralization.

The breccias in the Bland zone are also related to a principal fracture system which dips steeply to the east. As in the Chapman zone, copper/gold/silver mineralization occurs infilling what were originally voids between the breccia casts, but areas of high grade fracture filling mineralization also occurs in altered volcanic rocks in close proximity to the breccia zones. The width of the enriched core of the Hearne Hill porphyry system averages approximately 50 meters at surface and appears to widen at depth.

The Morrison copper-gold porphyry deposit is an elongated 600 by 1,500 m long northwesterly-trending deposit. The main BFP pluton at Morrison is a faulted plug, with nearly vertical contacts, which occupies a northwesterly oriented elliptical area. The Morrison plug is known to contain a large number of phases of BFP. There are ~~numerious~~numerous offshoots of the plug, many of which are northerly trending dykes or sills. The offshoots vary in width from less than 1 meter to greater than 500 meters.

The mineralization at Morrison occupies the central part of a major graben that is a component of the regional northwesterly trending block-fault system of the Babine area. The western bounding fault is believed to be along Morrison Lake, and the eastern fault is about 0.8 kilometers east of the property. The most prominent structure at Morrison is the north-northwest trending East Fault, which bisects the BFP plug and copper zone. The Morrison copper zone conforms to the shape of the BHP plug and is disrupted by the East and West faults. The copper zone is defined by external and internal boundaries that mark the limits of lithologic units with copper content consistently greater than 0.2% copper. In most places, the external boundary is relatively sharp and copper content declines outward to less than 0.1% copper within about 40 meters. The low-grade core averages between 0.15-0.2% copper. All copper sulphides are primary, with chalcopyr ite the main copper-bearing mineral. A pyrite halo is developed in the chlorite-carbonate altered wallrock that spatially bounds the copper zone. Copper mineralization is weakly developed in the pyrite halo.

Only minimal facilities currently exist on the property. An exploration camp is on site, and can accommodate 20 persons. Other, smaller buildings are on site, including a permanent core shack. Most exploration supplies are brought in via barge across Babine Lake and stored on site for the duration of the exploration program. Access from the barge landing to the camp and the exploration area is by heavy logging road. This network of logging roads is maintained by Canfor, a separate company that has logging rights over the area, including the Company’s property.

Water is available from the lakes and watercourses adjacent to the property. This water can be used for both potable and process water. A large source of electrical power is not currently available on the project site. An existing BC Hydro substation is located on the west side of Babine Lake near Granisle Township. An existing 138 kV line served the Bell mine site south of the property. ~~The~~In June 2008, the Company confirmed the availability of power from the Bell mine ~~was operated by Noranda until 1992~~electrical facility which is now energized at 25 kV and ~~is currently on care and maintenance status. This~~can be re-energized to its design voltage. A new 24.7 km 138 kV overhead line ~~could~~will be ~~extended northward~~constructed to link from the former Bell mine site to the ~~project.~~proposed Morrison mine site substation. BC Hydro has completed a study regarding the system load for the new line.

The economy of the region is based upon resource production, primarily mining and logging. The town of Granisle on Babine Lake was built to support the mines in the area, and offers housing and basic support services. An experienced workforce lives in the area of the property, and it is anticipated that most would commute to the property daily via barge or boat.

The Morrison Lake area was first explored for minerals in the early 1960’s. Regional stream sediment sampling in 1962 by Noranda Exploration Ltd. led to the discovery of the Morrison deposit in 1963. Between 1963 and 1973, Noranda conducted exploration at Morrison and drilled 95 diamond holes. By 1968, a sub-economic copper deposit had been outlined at Morrison that consisted of two zones. The zones are immediately northwest and southeast of a small central pond, and their positions correspond closely to strong geochemical and magnetic anomalies. Geological mapping done in 1963 and 1967 indicated the possibility that the two zones might be part of a single faulted deposit. Drilling in 1970 to test the central areas succeeded in joining the portions of the faulted copper zone. In total, Noranda drilled 95 diamond drill holes totaling 13,893 meters.

After the discovery of Morrison as well as two other copper/gold deposits further south along Morrison Lake, other mineral exploration companies arrived in the area. Tro-Buttle Exploration undertook a large scale soil sampling and magnetometer survey east of Morrison Lake on Hearne Hill. In 1967, while excavating a bulldozer trench on the most prominent anomaly on the western flank of Hearne Hill, a 1.5 meter boulder of brecciated rock cemented with chalcopyrite was unearthed. Based upon that discovery, Texas Gulf Sulphur optioned the property that year and undertook a systematic geological assessment of Hearne Hill. The program included 12 diamond drill holes totaling 1942 meters. Although drilling intersected only a small section of mineralized breccia, a low-grade porphyry deposit was partially delineated. As the copper grades were considered sub-economic, Texas Gulf declined to pay a large option payment and returned the property to Tr o-Buttle in early 1968. Canadian Superior Exploration then acquired an option on the property and performed magnetometer, IP, geological and geochemical surveys, followed by a percussion drill program in 1969. Results were not sufficient for either Canadian Superior or Tro-Buttle to maintain the property, and the property reverted back to the government.

Following the completion of the 1973 drill program, Noranda conducted no further field work at Morrison, although pit design studies were conducted in 1988 and 1990 in order to determine if the deposit could economically supply feed to the operating mill at its Bell Mine located approximately 15 kilometers south. Noranda determined that the deposit would not be economical to mine and process at Bell at that time.

No exploration was conducted at Hearne Hill from 1969 to 1989. In 1989, prospectors Chapman and Bland staked the property and optioned it to Noranda as part of Noranda’s search for additional ore for processing at the Bell Mine. Noranda conducted an exploration program on Hearne Hill including a small diamond drill program which succeeded in discovering a small breccia pipe, but the potential copper and gold resource did not meet Noranda’s current requirements and the property option was dropped in 1990. Chapman and Bland continued to explore the property on their own and continued to drill the breccia pipe. Results were good, and the property holders were in the process of permitting the property for production when Noranda closed the Bell Mine in April 1992.

All project samples are covered under a quality control program which commenced in the Phase II program beginning with drill hole Mo-00-17. There was no systematic quality control program implemented for samples from the first 16 drill hole samples.

All drill core is delivered to the core shack by the diamond drillers at the end of each shift. The core shack is a permanent, insulated and locking structure. All drill core is photographed prior to any disruption by geologists and geotechnicians before logging. Detailed core logs are compiled in 3.05 meter intervals. All core is split with a diamond saw into two halves. The first half is packaged and bagged and tagged in plastic bags for shipment to the laboratory, and the second half is replaced in the core box for reference and storage in the core shack.

Samples are organized into 20-sample batches with inclusion of quality control samples into the sample sequence of each batch. The suite of 17 core samples in the batch are complemented with one Booker Standard prepared by CDN Resource Laboratories of Delta, B.C., one Blank Standard from barren Morrison drill core, and one certified reference standard from Rocklabs Ltd. in Auckland, New Zealand in every second sample batch. One sample in the batch is prepared as a duplicate. The sample batches are transported by Company personnel to a shipping point where they are carried by private trucking company to independent certified assay laboratories. Check assays are submitted to a separate independent assay laboratory.

All of the Company’s work on the property is supervised by a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101 in Canada. National Instrument 43-101 is a set of rules developed and administered by the Canadian securities regulators to govern how Canadian resource companies handle and disclose technical information regarding their mineral project operations to the general public. It requires all disclosure be based on advice by a “Qualified Person”, which is defined as an individual that is an engineer or geoscientist with at least 5 years of experience in mineral exploration, mine development or operation or mineral project assessment; has experience relevant to the mineral project and technical report; and is a member in good standing of a relevant professional association.

In December 1992, Pacific Booker optioned the Hearne Hill property. In 1993, the Company began its exploration at Hearne Hill with a magnetometer survey, geological mapping, trenching and follow-up percussion drilling. From 1993 to 1997, the Company completed several phases of exploration on the property, including drilling 143 diamond drill holes. The Company was successful in discovering the higher-grade Chapman and Bland zones, as well as the lower grade porphyry envelope. In 1997, the Company engaged Giroux Consultants to prepare a preliminary resource estimate for the project. Additional drilling will be necessary in order to upgrade the indicated resource to the Proven category for a feasibility study on the economics of the property. Since 1997, Pacific Booker has concentrated most of its exploration efforts on the adjacent Morrison property. Because the Company is currently focused on the feasibility study at Morrison, management w rote down the remaining value of the Hearne Hill property during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 but retains its interest in the property.

The Company acquired an option to acquire ~~50% of~~ the ~~adjacent~~ Morrison property in 1997. The Company initiated Phase I exploration shortly after finalizing the option agreement. Work including a property wide geochemical survey, trenching, mapping, and diamond drilling was conducted from 1997 to July 2000. Eleven diamond drill holes of large size NQ core totaling 3,818 meters were used to confirm and validate Noranda’s previous work as well as to test and define the mineralization at depth. Based upon the results of the Phase 1 program, the Company initiated Phase 2 of exploration, which included the drilling of 13 additional diamond drill holes totaling 3,181 in order define the configuration and potential economic limits of the deposit. The Company also completed an IP survey over the northwest sector of the deposit area to search for possible extensions to the known deposit and to possibly define the boundary between the copper ~~zon e~~zone and the pyrite halo.

In 2001, the Company initiated Phase III exploration at Morrison. The program was designed to delineate the deposit both laterally and to depth by completing a series of diamond drill holes at 60-meter centers. The program was also designed to determine the copper and gold distribution of the deposit and identify potentially higher grade zones of mineralization in order to complete a resource study of the deposit and provide data for a full feasibility study. From June 2001 to July 2002, the Company drilled 58 holes totaling 15,284 meters. The review of the prior work conducted by Noranda as well as the 3 exploration phases conducted by Pacific Booker has allowed the Company to identify three main zones of mineralization for the deposit. These are the Central, Southeast and Northwest Zones.

The Central Zone forms the main segment of the Morrison deposit. It is largely bounded by the East and West Faults with part of the southwesterly margin of the zone conforming to the transitional contact with the pyrite halo. The Phase III drilling defined and confirmed three significant copper-gold mineralization domains within the Central Zone. Drilling has confirmed the dimensions, configuration and continuity of higher grade copper and gold domains within the Central Zone.

The Southeast Zone occurs as a 300 m wide semi-circular-shaped zone east of the East Fault. The copper-gold mineralization abruptly weakens along the eastern margin where it transitionally changes to the pyrite halo style of mineralization. The zone remains open to the south.

The Northwest Zone is interpreted as an apparent faulted off-set of the Central Zone and lies west of the West Fault and is bounded by the pyrite halo to the west. The zone is 75 by 400 meters long and drilling to date extends the zone to a depth of 170 meters.

Several areas of mineralization at the Morrison deposit remain open and require additional drilling to test for extensions or further definition. These include southern and southeastern portions of the deposit, where mineralization remains open and the boundaries of the copper/gold mineralization remain undefined; and at depth, where drill hole MO-99-04, the deepest drilled on the property to date, ended in mineralization at a depth of 454.46 meters. There are also several areas of interest on the property around the main Morrison deposit which have also been identified for drilling to test for possible satalitic mineralization, particularly to the northwest and southeast of the known mineralization.

The Phase III drill program totaled 82 holes of about 23,000 meters which succeeded in substantially delineating the Morrison deposit. The Company engaged SNC Lavalin of Toronto, Ontario, to prepare a scoping study for Morrison which included a geostatistical block model and a resource estimate. Snowden Mining Industry Consultants of Vancouver, British Columbia was engaged to incorporate SNC’s work into generating optimized pit designs and manual geological polygonal block models for further developing resource estimates for the Morrison deposit. Snowden completed and delivered its report to Booker’s management in early May, 2003.

Upon receipt of the Snowden Resource Estimation and Preliminary Pit Optimisation Study, Booker initiated a Feasibility Study on the Morrison property. In December 2003, the company engaged Beacon Hill Consultants to prepare a full feasibility study on the Morrison project. The Study includes geotechnical, waste management and environmental studies, as well as studying potential waste and tailings sites. The feasibility study will also include a further 4000 meters of drilling to obtained geotechnical data as well as further delineate the higher grade mineralization in the central copper zone, explore mineralization to the south-east and close off the deposit to the north and south. In September 2003, the Company released assay results from 5 holes drilled along the known northern limits of the Morrison deposit and which management believes has successfully closed off the northern edge of the deposit.

Beacon Hill ~~has~~ completed a draft of a Preliminary Assessment Report on the feasibility of the claims, and work is continuing to bring the draft report to the Final Feasibility Report. During the second half of 2004, work at the property site was primarily composed of environmental studies, including surface water quality sampling and flow rate monitoring, fish habitat studies, acid-rock drainage potential, and wildlife impact studies.

Fieldwork resumed in January 2005 after a winter break. 4 large (PQ) diameter drill holes totaling 700 meters were drilled as part of the metallurgical test program. These holes were twinned from smaller holes drilled between 1998 and 2002 and were designed to obtain representative bulk samples of potential mill feed material. Process Research Associates of Vancouver was retained to conduct the material test program including comminution and flotation tests on these samples in order to determine an optimal ore treatment process. The testwork indicated the merallurgy of the deposit was relatively straightforward. The results will be reviewed to establish a metallurgical database which will be used to establish design criteria in conjunction with other test work to determine potential mining and resource estimates. The design criteria will also be used to develop preliminary capital and operating cost estimates at a range of potential rates of tonnes mined to enable optimization of the proposed mine. These cost estimates are critical components of establishing a mine cut-off grade, optimized mill throughput and the overall mining plan. Following the review of the optimization studies, design activities for the mill and concentrator plant will proceed. Core from the metallurgical drill holes are also used for Acid Rock draining studies. Waste rock intersected in two holes is being used in humidity cell tests, which are used to determine the long term effects of the environment on the waste rock materials in regards to future potential environmental impact.

Environmental baseline studies continued for Surface Water Hydrology, Groundwater Hydrology, Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat, Fisheries and Aquatic Habitat, Trace Metals in Vegetation and Acid Rock Drainage studies. Digital water pressure monitors were installed in three drill holes for modeling pit hydrogeology, and static groundwater monitoring in old drill holes is continuing in order to test for seasonal changes in water levels. A Preliminary Hydrology Report was submitted which will be used for the planning and design of the mine infrastructure and facilities.

A drill program was completed during the winter of 2005 to finalize ore delineation and to determine geo-technical criteria for the design of the pit. Detailed design of the pit and updated mineral resource estimates will be completed which incorporate the drilling results.

On October 14, 2005, a “Draft Terms of Reference” document was developed and submitted to the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (“BCEAO”) for an Application for an Enviromnental Assessment Certificate for the construction, operation, maintenance, decommissioning and reclamation of an open-pit mine on the Morrison property. The final “Terms of Reference” document is being developed in consultation with government agencies, First Nations, and the public. A revised Project Description was also submitted to the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office.

Subsequent to the year-end, the Company continued work on the full Feasibility Study. The work included geotechnical investigations, environmental base line studies, and tailings characterizations to determine metal recoveries.

A geotechnical investigations program was completed on the proposed open pit. The main purpose of the site investigation program was to collect the geotechnical information for the open pit slope design for the feasibility study. Seven oriented core drill holes were drilled to provide geotechnical information for the rock mass in the vicinity of the proposed final pit walls and to intersect the major structures that were identified in previous investigations. In addition to detailed geotechnical logging, core sample collection and packer permeability tests were completed on the drill holes. Laboratory test work on selected samples included point load tests, unconfined compressive strength tests and direct shear tests. Detailed geotechnical logs were compiled along with the field and laboratory tests results to establish a complete geotechnical database for the open pit area.

The geotechnical drill program commenced on the proposed waste management site and plant site included drilling 14 short geotechnical and condemnation drill holes, and 35 test pits. The purpose of the drill holes is to test the foundations of the waste retaining dam, to test the foundations for the plant site, and to monitor ground water. Standard Penetrometer Testing (“SPT”)) was used for overburden intervals and Packer Testing for rock foundations. Soil samples for laboratory geotechnical tests were collected from the SPT process. The primary purpose of the test pits is to test waste dam, plant site and waste conveyor foundation and slope stability. Another purpose of the test pits is to determine locations of potential construction material, i.e. till, sand, or gravel. One geotechnical drill hole was drilled in the proposed open pit to monitor groundwater quality in the mineralized zone and two drill holes were drilled ~~downstr eam~~downstre am of the waste management site to monitor groundwater quality.

~~For the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company incurred $606,731 in expenditures~~During fiscal 2007, work continued on ~~the Morrison property.~~

~~The Company is continuing the work required to complete~~ the full Feasibility Study. The following consulting firms have been retained to perform these specific work ~~will include geotechnical investigations, environmental base line studies, and tailings characterization to determine recoveries.~~programs as part of the Feasibility Study.

Rescan Environmental Services Ltd. – to complete the Environmental Assessment.

SGS Canada Inc. – to complete the grinding and floatation test work and circuit design.

Klohn Crippen Burger Ltd. – to complete the Geotechnical Engineering and Design for tailings and waste rock management, surface water management and infrastructure foundation design.

Commenced work on the ~~proposed open pit. The site investigation program~~Open Pit Optimization. This work includes mine plan, resource reserves, mill size, equipment requirements, equipment costs, and haulage costs.

Feasibility level Open Pit Geo-technical investigations, to ~~collect~~provide the ~~geotechnical~~geo-technical information required for the feasibility level open pit slope ~~design is continuing. The objective of the pit slope design is~~design;

Feasibility level Open Pit Slope Design, to determine the steepest practical slope angles for the open pit ~~mine, so~~mine;

Waste Management Site and Plant Site Geo-technical Investigations, to provide geo-technical information for the ~~operator can maximize the extraction~~design of the ~~identified ore~~Waste Management Facility and the proposed plant.

Geo-chemical analysis of geologic samples for Acid Base Accounting and assaying of samples for molybdenum.

In April 2007, the updated Resource Estimate for the Morrison project was completed by Geosim Services Ltd. and filed. The estimate was prepared using a cut-off grade of 0.3% Equivalent Copper. The copper equivalent was calculated using relative recovery and metal prices of $1.78/lb copper, $465/oz gold, and $10/lb molybdenum. Composited intervals from 98 drill holes representing 22,982 meters of core were used in the block model estimation. Block size was 20x20x12 meters and grade estimation was carried out by the ordinary kriging using 6 meter downhole drill composites. Gold grades were capped at 1.5 g/t prior to compositing.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This section uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources”. We advise U.S. investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them.U.S. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

This section uses the term “inferred resources”. We advise U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies.U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Work on the full Feasibility Study and the environmental assessment continued during Fiscal 2008. If the Feasibility Study is favorable, it is anticipated the permitting process will ~~continue~~lead to ~~complete~~detailed engineering and construction of a mine. The environmental assessment will be used to apply for a mining permit for the construction, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning and reclamation of an open-pit mine on the property. On January 18, 2008, a Section 11 Order under the BC Environmental ~~base line studies~~Assessment Act was issued to the Company, which permits the Company to conduct a formal environmental assessment in support of the Morrison Project Permit to construct application.

A Geotechnical and Hydrogeology Drill program was completed, as 15 geotechnical and 16 water monitoring holes were drilled in the proposed impoundment area, the open pit, and the plant site. This concluded the fieldwork, although environmental monitoring will continue.

Wardrop Engineering completed a Trade-off Study to evaluate the application of High Pressure Grinding Rolls (“HGPR”) as an alternative technology to the conventional semi-autogenous milling process for the project. The results of the Study indicate the application of HPGR would result in significant operating costs savings amounting to more than 23%, including the reduction of power of 3.67 megawatts, or $0.08/t, and reduction of consumables of $0.59/t. As a result, HGPR was incorporated into the project design.

Floatation and grinding testwork was completed by SGS Canada. The testing recoveries were Copper of 84.4%, Molybdenum of 79%, Gold of 59.4%, and Silver of 55.6%, with a concentrate grade of 25.1%.

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, the Company incurred $3,346,755 in expenditures on the Morrison property.

During Fiscal 2009 ended January 31, 2009, the Company intends to participate in the Environmental ~~Assessment Certificate, as well as the consultative processes~~Assessment; Application review for a permit to construct a mine; arrange Project Financing, tender an Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract; arrange for all Permits; conclude a Marketing Agreement; and continue with ~~government regulators,~~ First Nations, Government and ~~local communities. The Environmental Work Program includes Baseline Data Collection and Environmental Characterization, Environmental Assessment and Permitting.~~

Detailed design of the pit, process plant, waste disposal system and mine plans; and updated mineral resource estimates will be completed based on the drilling results, optimization and environmental studies.Community Relations.

The Company estimates its expenditures for the anticipated work on the Morrison project for the year ended January 31, ~~2007~~2009 will be CDN$~~2,025,000.~~2,500,000.

The Hearne Hill property lies adjacent to the Company’s Morrison project as described above. Hearne Hill is represented by various mineral claims covered by theMineral Tenure Act which were acquired from Arms-length individuals. The Company has a 100% interest in the Hearne Hill property, subject to a 4% NSR,

Issuance of 40,000 common shares in 4 tranches of 10,000 shares each as certain milestones were met.

During fiscal 2007, the Company was named in an action filed with the British Columbia Supreme Court by Lorne Spence, one of the original optionors of the Hearne Hill property. Mr. Spence’s action seeks the return of certain mineral claims, or unspecified damages in the alternative. Mr. Spence also sought to include the return of the Company’s Morrison property as part of the suit. In June 2007, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the application to include the Morrison property. The lawsuit regarding the return of the Hearne Hill property is continuing, and the Company is vigorously defending the action. Pacific Booker has also filed a counterclaim for $55,356 for breach of contract.

Tro-Buttle Exploration undertook a large scale soil sampling and magnetometer survey east of Morrison Lake on Hearne Hill. In 1967, while excavating a bulldozer trench on the most prominent anomaly on the western flank of Hearne Hill, a 1.5 meter boulder of brecciated rock cemented with chalcopyrite was unearthed. Based upon that discovery, Texas Gulf Sulphur optioned the property that year and undertook a systematic geological assessment of Hearne Hill. The program included 12 diamond drill holes totaling 1942 meters. Although drilling intersected only a small section of mineralized breccia, a low-grade porphyry deposit was partially delineated. As the copper grades were considered sub-economic, Texas Gulf declined to pay a large option payment and returned the property to Tro-Buttle in early 1968. Canadian Superior Exploration then acquired an option on the property and performed magnetometer, IP, geological and geochemical surveys, foll owed by a percussion drill program in 1969. Results were not sufficient for either Canadian Superior or Tro-Buttle to maintain the property, and the property reverted back to the government.

In December 1992, Pacific Booker optioned the Hearne Hill property. In 1993, the Company began its exploration at Hearne Hill with a magnetometer survey, geological mapping, trenching and follow-up percussion drilling. From 1993 to 1997, the Company completed several phases of exploration on the property, including drilling 143 diamond drill holes. The Company was successful in discovering the higher-grade Chapman and Bland zones, as well as the lower grade porphyry envelope. In 1997, the Company engaged Giroux Consultants to prepare a preliminary resource estimate for the project. Additional drilling will be necessary in order to upgrade the indicated resource to the Proven category for a feasibility study. Since 1997, Pacific Booker has concentrated most of its exploration efforts on the adjacent Morrison property. Because the Company is currently focused on the feasibility study at Morrison and the Hearne Hill resource has not been dete rmined to be economic, management wrote down the remaining value of the Hearne Hill property during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 but retains its interest in the property.

The Copper and CUB properties are copper/gold exploration properties in British Columbia located in the Granisle area. The Copper property lies 2.5 kilometers south of the Hearne Hill property, while CUB adjoins Hearne Hill to the south.

The Company acquired a 100% interest in CUB in June 1995 in exchange for 100,000 common shares at a deemed price of $1.20 per share, or $120,000 total. The property is subject to a 3% NSR to the vendor. Pacific Booker may acquire up to 2% of the 3% NSR in 1% increments at $500,000 per 1% increment at any time.

The Company acquired a 100% interest in Copper in June 1995 in exchange for 100,000 common shares of the Company at a deemed price of $1.30 per share, or $130,000 total. The property is subject to a 3% NSR to the vendor. Pacific Booker may acquire up to 2% of the 3% NSR in 1% increments at $500,000 per 1% increment at any time.

Since acquisition, the Company has conducted no exploration on the Copper and CUB claims but maintains the properties in good standing due to their strategic location to its ~~Hearne Hill/~~Morrison project. Any future exploration on the properties will be dependent upon exploration results at Hearne Hill and Morrison. As the Company has no current plans to conduct exploration on the Claims, the acquisition costs of the claims were written off during the year ended January 31, 2005.

In November 1998, the Company acquired the Bingo mineral exploration property in San Juan Province, Argentina. Consideration for the acquisition was $10,000 cash. The size of the property is approximately 1,000 acres. In June 1999, the Company signed an option agreement with Sunstate Resources, where Sunstate can earn a 75% interest in the property by incurring $230,000 in exploration expenditures before June 8, 2004 and by issuing 100,000 common shares of Sunstate to Pacific Booker by June 8, 2002. Sunstate failed to issue the required common shares and the Company retains a 100% interest in the property. Prior to 2004, the Company has recorded $735 in property expenditures on Bingo which were spent to keep the property in good standing. However, during Fiscal 2004, management decided not to continue with the property and the acquisition costs and property expenditures were written off.

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (C$) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the years presented with US GAAP, except as disclosed in Note 1715 to the financial ~~statements.~~statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008. The value of the U.S. Dollar in relationship to the Canadian Dollar was ~~$1.14~~$1.00 as of January 31, ~~2006.~~2008.

The Company has since inception financed its activities through the distribution of equity capital. The Company anticipates having to raise additional funds by equity issuance in the next several years, as all of the Company’s properties are at the exploration stage. The timing of such offerings is dependent upon the success of the Company’s exploration program and feasibility study as well as the general economic climate.

As a mineral explorer in the Province of British Columbia, the Company is eligible to receive British Columbia Mining Tax Credits. These credits are a percentage of the Company’s eligible exploration expenditures made each year. The credits are refundable annually, and application for reimbursement is made along with the Company’s annual Federal tax return. After a review by the tax authorities, the Canadian Federal government, on behalf of the British Columbia Provincial government, issues a check for those credits. Since the refund process typically takes about a year, the Company accounts for these tax credits as a Receivable on its balance sheet upon the Company attaining reasonable assurance of collection from the Canadian Federal Government.

The Company typically contracts with outside suppliers for the majority of its exploration work. In order to ensure the availability of these contractors, the Company typically maintains a cash deposit with these suppliers as an advance against anticipated payments for exploration work performed. The Company accounts for these payments as Exploration Advances on its balance sheet. As these contractors perform the exploration work, the amounts of the advances are deducted from any amounts owed to the contractors and are recorded by the Company as deferred exploration costs.

During the year, the Company continued work on the feasibility study on the Morrison project. Work included floatation and grinding testwork, milling studies, and completion of the Geotechnical and Hydrogeology drill programs.

The net loss for the year ended January 31, 2008 was ($2,221,907), or ($0.23) per share, compared to a loss of ($1,365,664), or ($0.17) per share for the year ended January 31, 2007. The higher loss in the current year included an increase in Stock-based Compensation expense of ($1,248,170) compared to ($587,478) in the prior year, with the increase due to additional stock options granted during the year; An increase in Investor Relations - Related Party to ($409,153) from ($246,124) was due to a one-time bonus to the directors directly involved in the raising of funds; Travel rose to ($93,374) from ($50,414) due to increased promotional activity; Office and Miscellaneous rose to ($109,971) from ($77,615) due to higher insurance costs; Professional Fees increased to ($162,835) from ($151,792) due to the higher legal fees related to the Hearne Hill property suit; Filing and Transfer Agent Fees increased to ($84,144) from ($62,261) which was related to the payment of initial listing fees to the American Stock Exchange; Foreign Exchange Loss rose to ($50,217) from ($34,823) due to unfavorable changes in the Canadian/$US dollar exchange rates; and Wages and Benefits increased to ($49,354) from ($6,082) due to the change in status of one investor relations consultant and the related costs for the taxable benefit deemed on the exercise of options by directors, consultants, and employees.

Interest income for the year was $209,308, which was higher than the $139,136 recorded in the prior fiscal year due to higher cash balances during the current year. All of the Company’s funds are held by the Company’s chartered bank in Canada, and all deposit certificates currently held are fully redeemable at any time, with the interest rates tied to the prime interest rate of the bank.

During the year, the Company continued work on the feasibility study on the Morrison project. Work included pit design and optimization studies, metallurgical testing, environmental studies, as well as to update mineral resource estimates.

The net loss for the year ended January 31, 2007 was ($1,365,664), or ($0.17) per share, compared to a loss of ($8,883,273), or ($1.41) per share, in the year ended January 31, 2006. The higher loss in the prior year included the write-off of the acquisition and deferred exploration on the Hearne Hill property of ($7,851,288) as the Company focused its current work on the Morrison property. The current year’s General and Administrative Expense totaled ($1,504,800) compared to ($1,045,363) in the prior year. Higher expenses included Director’s fees of ($14,000) compared to zero, as the Company began compensating its independent directors for attendance at board at committee meetings; Investor Relations fees rose to ($73,140) from ($43,658), Investor Relations – Related party increased to ($246,124) from ($119,279), and Shareholder Information and Promotion rose to ($117,964) from ($44,249), as the Company increased its invest or relations activities for fund raising; Filing and Transfer Agent Fees increased to ($62,261) from ($30,131), which was related to the cost of the Company’s Private Placement; Office and Miscellaneous increased to ($77,615) from ($61,850) due to increased office activity; Office Rent rose to ($67,930) from ($58,848) due to higher rental rates on the head office; Professional Fees totaled ($151,792) compared to ($104,044) in the prior year due to higher legal fees related to the Hearne Hill property lawsuit; Stock-based Compensation rose to ($587,478) from ($417,757) related to the issuance of common stock options under the Company’s Stock Option Plan; and the Company recorded a Gain on Settlement of Debt of $50,000 in the current year as management was able to negotiate a discount on the debt owed to Falconbridge for the Morrison Property acquisition for early payment. Interest Income was $139,136 compared to $13,378 in the prior year, with the increase related to higher cash balances in the curr ent fiscal year.

During the year, the Company continued work on the feasibility study on the Morrison project. Work included drill programs to finalize ore delineation and pit design, as well as to update mineral resource estimates and samples for potential mill feed studies. Environmental studies continued, and a “Draft Terms of Reference” and a revised Project Description were submitted to British Columbia regulators.

The net loss for the year ended January 31, 2006 before other items was ($1,045,363) compared to a loss before other items of ($658,726) in the prior year. Total Loss for the year was ($8,883,273), or ($1.41) per share, compared to a loss of ($902,759), or ($0.16) per share, in the year ended January 31, 2005. The loss for the current year included the Write-off of the acquisition and deferred exploration on the Hearne Hill property of ($7,851,288) as the Company is focusing its current work on the Morrison property. The higher General and Administrative Expenses included larger Stock-based Compensation expense of ($417,757) compared to ($212,914) due to a higher number of stock options vested during the current year; higher Consulting Fees of ($16,170) compared to ($6,030) and Consulting Fees – Related Party of ($55,531) compared to ($45,200) which were due to feasibility work on the Morrison project; Foreign Exchange loss of ($27,02 7) compared to a gain of $50,026 in the prior year due to unfavorable changes in exchange rates; Higher Investor Relations Fees of ($43,658) compared to ($34,823), Investor Relations – Related Party of ($119,279) compared to ($78,000), and Shareholder Information and Promotion of ($44,249) compared to ($21,137) were due to the Company increasing its efforts to inform the shareholders and the investment community of the Company’s activities. Interest Income rose to $13,378 from $5,967 due to higher cash balances during the current year.

During the year the Company and its consultant, Beacon Hill Consultants, continued work on the Morrison/Hearne Hill project Feasibility Study which began in January 2004. Work on the project site was primarily related to the required environmental impact studies which are part of the full feasibility study which is expected to be completed during calendar 2005.

The net loss for the year was ($902,759), or ($0.16) per share, compared to a loss of ($327,241), or ($0.06), in the year-ago period. Reasons for the higher loss include higher Stock-based Compensation Expense of ($212,914) compared to zero in the prior year’s period. This expense is related to the grant of 676,000 stock options to Officers and directors in October 2004. A portion of the higher loss was due to increased activity related to the Morrison/Hearne Hill feasibility study which included higher Consulting Fees of ($6,030) compared to zero and Consulting Fees with a related party of ($45,200) compared to ($14,000); Professional Fees of ($117,506) compared to ($79,293); Travel Fees of ($50,526) compared to ($43,191). Other large changes in individual expenses included a Foreign Exchange gain of $50,026 compared to a loss of ($21,626) due to favorable changes in exchange rates, Shareholder Information and Promotion, which rose t o ($21,137) from ($12,936), and Filing and Transfer Agent Fees, which rose to ($43,188) from ($19,886). The Company also had a Write-off of Accounts Payable of $31,322 and Write-off of Exploration Advances of ($20,044). During the current year the Company also recorded no Recovery of Overhead Expenses Charged to Exploration compared to $81,787 in the prior year. The change is due to the new agreement with Noranda which no longer allows the Company to be reimbursed by Noranda for 15% of its property expenditures. Other Items included Write-off of Mineral Property Interests of ($250,000) compared to ($10,735) in the prior year as the Company decided to write-down its entire acquisition costs related to acquisition of the Copper and CUB claims.

During the year the Company continued to conduct exploration on the Morrison property, including environmental and geotechnical studies, which are part of the Company’s pre-feasibility study. The Company also completed a drill program designed as additional infill drilling as well as to find the northern limits of the north-central copper zone and to provide technical information for the ongoing studies. In January 2004, the Company announced the initiation of a full feasibility study at Hearne Hill/Morrison which will study the economic feasibility and of an open pit mining operation. The feasibility study is expected to take 12-18 months to complete.

The loss for year rose to ($327,241) from ($302,320) incurred in the prior year. The largest reason for the change was a decrease in Overhead Expenses Charged to Exploration, which fell to $81,787 from $157,128 due to lower property expenditures. These recoveries are related to the agreement with Noranda that allows the Company to recover 15% of its total exploration expenditures at Morrison to offset the administrative and financing costs for conducting the exploration program. Other large changes in expenses occurred in consulting fees, which fell to zero from ($24,287) which was also related to lower levels of exploration work at Morrison; Foreign Exchange Loss, which rose to ($21,626) from ($7,434) due to unfavorable changes in the Canadian dollar exchange rate; Travel rose to ($43,191) from ($29,287); Professional Fees increased to ($79,293) from ($55,268); Investor Relations Fees fell to ($33,051) from ($135,9 39); and Office Rent increased to ($53,582) from ($44,212), as the Company’s annual rent increased under its lease agreement.

The Company’s working capital position as of January 31, 2008, the end of the most recent fiscal year, ~~at January 31, 2006~~ was ~~$11,239.~~$5,058,171. Subsequent to the year end through July 17th, the Company completed the private placement 970,200 common share units at a price of $4.00 per unit for total proceeds of $3,880,800. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share at a price of $4.50 on or before April 11, 2008. The Company also issued ~~403,000~~833,700 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of ~~$1,636,650~~$3,807,150 and issued ~~7,000~~101,250 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of ~~$35,000. The~~$406,563. Combined with the Company’s working capital as of January 31, 2008, the funds raised ~~in this placement and~~by the exercises of options and warrants are expected to be sufficient for the fiscal ~~2007~~2009 budgeted amounts of $2,500,000 for the ongoing Feasibility Study on the Morrison project and fiscal ~~2007’s~~2009’s estimated General and Administrative ~~expenses.~~expenses of $2,225,000.

~~In June 2006,~~Although the Company announced the non-brokered private placement of 300,000 common share purchase units at a price of $5.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share a price of $6.00 for a two year period. The proceeds from this placement are intended to be used for the final cash payment of $1,500,000 due to Falconbridge Limited for the acquisition of the Morrison property. In July, the Company announced an amendment to this private placement. Subscriptions to the placement totaled 500,000 units instead of the originally planned 300,000 units. The Company intends to use $1,500,000 of proceeds from the revised placement for the Falconbridge payment, with the remainder to be used for general working capital.

~~The~~ Company currently has sufficient working capital for its planned property expenditures and general and administrative expenses for fiscal ~~2007. The~~2009, the Company has no cash flow from ~~operations. Additional~~operations, and additional funds will be required for fiscal ~~2008, including the required $1,500,000 payment to Falconbridge Limited.~~2010. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern depends upon its ability to raise additional funds to meet its business objectives. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds to meet its requirements, it may be forced to suspend the feasibility study, ~~fail to acquire a 100% interest in the Morrison property~~ or cease operations altogether.

Upon completion of the feasibility study, if the property is determined to be economic, additional funding will be necessary to fund any development. Specific funding requirements are dependent upon the results of any feasibility study and at this time management cannot predict the amount of funds needed or the timing of any equity and/or debt financings.

The Company has financed its operations through the issuance of common shares. The following private placements have been completed in the last 5 fiscal years.

Fiscal Year	Type of Share Issuance	Number of Common Shares Issued	Price	Total Proceeds

2002	Private Placement	135,000	$ 3.50	$ 472,000
	Private Placement	105,000	3.00	315,000

2003	Private Placement	95,000	$ 4.00	$ 380,000
	Private Placement	137,500	4.00	550,000
	Private Placement	80,500	5.25	422,625
	Private Placement	10,000	3.75	37,500
Fiscal Year Ended January 31					Type of Share Issuance	Number of Common Shares Issued	Price	Total Proceeds

2004	Private Placement	127,186	$ 4.00	$ 508,744	Private Placement	127,186	$ 4.00	$ 508,744

2005	Private Placement	300,000	$ 3.85	$ 1,155,000	Private Placement	300,000	$ 3.85	$ 1,155,000
	Private Placement	23,000	4.00	92,000	Private Placement	23,000	4.00	92,000
	Private Placement	115,000	4.00	460,000	Private Placement	115,000	4.00	460,000
	Private Placement	82,500	4.00	330,000	Private Placement	82,500	4.00	330,000
	Private Placement	77,030	4.15	319,674	Private Placement	77,030	4.15	319,674

2006	Private Placement	228,000	$ 4.15	$ 946,200	Private Placement	228,000	$ 4.15	$ 946,200
	Private Placement	520,450	$ 4.00	2,081,800	Private Placement	520,450	$ 4.00	2,081,800

2007	Private Placement	970,200	$ 4.05	$ 3,880,800	Private Placement	970,200	$ 4.00	$ 3,880,800
To date
					Private Placement	500,000	$ 5.00	$ 2,500,000

2008					None	Nil	Nil	Nil

The Company’s Working Capital as of January 31, 2008 was $5,058,171. During the year, Operating Activities used cash of ($872,140). In addition to the fiscal year’s net loss of ($2,221,907), other non-cash charges included Stock-based Compensation of ($1,248,170) and Amortization of $14,979. Changes in non-cash working capital items included increase in Receivables of ($3,775), decrease in amounts owing to related parties which used cash of ($18,525), decrease in Prepaids and Deposits of $99,117, and increase in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities of $9,801. Investing Activities used cash of ($3,204,399), which included cash used for Mineral Property Interests and Deferred Exploration of ($3,200,852) and Purchase of Equipment, Vehicles or Furniture of ($3,547). Financing Activities provided cash of $5,616,788, with the entire amount from the Issuance of Capital Stock.

During the year, the Company issued 1,292,900 common shares. 366,750 common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $1,771,738, and 926,150 common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $3,845,050.

The Company’s Working Capital as of January 31, 2007 totaled $3,748,025. Operating Activities used cash of ($992,627). In addition to the year’s net loss of ($1,365,664), other non-cash charges included Stock-based Compensation of $587,478, Amortization of $15,928, and Loss on Asset Disposal of $3,786. The Company also had the non-cash charge of Gain on Settlement of Debt of ($50,000) related to the discount for prepayment of the debt paid to Falconbridge for the final Morrison Property payment. Receivables increased by $(98,494), while Prepaids and Deposits rose by ($113,795), Accounts Payable increased ($9,781) and Amounts Owing to Related Parties rose by $18,353. Investing Activities used cash of ($2,300,297). Mineral Property Interests and Deferred Exploration Costs used cash of ($2,282,049), Proceeds from Sale of Equipment provided cash of $467, and Purchase of Property and Equipment used cash of ($18,715). Financing Activit ies provided cash of $6,868,225, with Issuance of Capital Stock providing cash of $8,318,225 Repayment of Long-Term Debt used cash of ($1,450,000) which was the final cash payment to Falconbridge under the Morrison acquisition agreement.

During the year, the Company issued 2,008,700 common shares. 970,200 were issued pursuant to a private placement at $4.00 per unit, with each unit consisting of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, for proceeds of $3,880,800; 500,000 common shares were issued pursuant to a private placement of units at $5.00 per unit for proceeds of $2,500,000, with each unit consisting of one share and one common share purchase warrant. The Company also issued 526,500 common shares pursuant to the exercise of common stock warrants for proceeds of $2,157,425, and issued 12,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of common stock options for proceeds of $60,000.

The Company’s working capital as of January 31, 2006 totaled ~~$11.239.~~$11,239. Operating Activities used cash of ($622,218), with the year’s net loss of ($8,883,273) including the non-cash write-off of Mineral Property Interests and Deferred Exploration Costs of 7,851,288. Other non-cash charges included Stock-based Compensation of $417,757 and Amortization of $8,759. Receivables decreased by $69,535, while Prepaids and Deposits rose by ($14,816), Accounts Payable decreased ($77,678) and Amounts Owing to Related Parties rose by $6,210. Investing Activities used cash of ($1,170,015). Mineral Property Interests and Deferred Exploration Costs used cash of ($1,018,559), Exploration Advances used cash of ($56,250), Reclamation Deposits used cash of ($46,100), and Purchase of Property and Equipment used cash of ($49,106). Financing Activities provided cash of $1,733,225; Issuance of Capital Stock provided cash of $2,453,225 and Share Subscripti ons Received in Advance providing cash of $280,000. Repayment of Long-Term Debt used cash of ($1,000,000) which was a payment to Falconbridge under the Morrison acquisition agreement.

During the year, the Company issued 793,450 common shares. 228,000 were issued pursuant to a private placement at $4.15 per unit, with each unit consisting of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, for proceeds of $946,200, of which $574,775 was received prior to January 31, 2005. 520,450 common shares were issued pursuant to a private placement of units at $4.00 per unit for proceeds of $2,081,800, with each unit consisting of one share and one common share purchase warrant. The Company also issued 45,000 common shares at a fair market value of $4.00 per share pursuant to a property acquisition agreement.

The Company’s working capital totaled ($456,174) as of January 31, 2005, compared to working capital of $166,874 on January 31, 2004. During the year, the Company’s Operating Activities used cash of ($498,314). The year’s loss of ($902,759) was partially offset by non-cash charges including Write-off of mineral property interests and deferred property exploration costs of $250,000, Write-off of exploration advances of $20,044, Write-off of Accounts Payable of ($31,322), and Stock-based Compensation related to the grant of stock options to officers and directors of $212,914. Changes in Non-cash working capital items included decreases in receivables of $180,377, in prepaids and deposits of $21,531, in accounts payable of ($172,487), and in amounts owing to related parties of ($80,481). Investing Activities used cash of ($1,735,122), with the majority for Resource Property Costs of ($1,760,122), and Exploration Advances of $25,000. Financing Activities provided cash of $2,656,762, with Issuance of Capital Stock providing cash of $2,119,275, Share Subscriptions Received in Advance providing cash of $574,775, Due to Related Parties using cash of ($36,700) and Obligations Under Capital Leases using cash of ($588).

During the year, the Company issued a total of 864,530 common shares. 250,000 were issued pursuant to property agreements at a fair value of $4.05 per share for a fair value of $1,012,500; 597,530 common shares were issued pursuant to private placements for total proceeds of $2,356,675; 15,000 common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options for proceeds of $30,000; and 2,000 common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $8,000.

The Company’s working capital totaled $166,874 as of January 31, 2004, compared to $490,333 on January 31, 2003. During the year, the Company’s Operating Activities provided cash of $40,164. The net loss of ($327,241) for the year was offset by a decrease in Receivables of $145,324; a decrease in Prepaids and Deposits of $23,354; an increase in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities of $111,141; and an increase in Accounts Payable to related parties of $72,446. Financing Activities provided cash of $828,411, with $518,744 provided by Issuance of Capital Stock; $275,400 from Share Subscriptions received in advance for private placements which had not yet closed; $36,700 due to Related Parties; and $2,433 used by Obligations under Capital Leases. Investing Activities used cash of $865,414, with Mineral Property Interests and Deferred Exploration Costs using cash of $896,558, Exploration Advances using cash of $1,917, and Purchase of Property and Equipment using cash of $4,439, while Restricted Cash provided cash of $37,500.

During the year, the Company issued 174,130 common shares. 127,186 common shares were issued pursuant to private placements for proceeds of $508,744; 2,500 common shares were issued for the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $10,000; and 44,444 common shares were issued for settlement of accounts payable at a deemed value of $200,000.

Under Canadian GAAP, mineral ~~properties,~~property interests and deferred exploration costs, including ~~exploration, development~~acquisition and ~~acquisition~~exploration costs, are carried at cost and written down if the properties are abandoned, sold or if management ~~decides not~~determines there to ~~pursue the properties.~~be an impairment in value. Under USUnited States GAAP, ~~effective for periods beginning after April 29, 2004, the~~deferred exploration costs are expensed as incurred. The Company ~~adopted~~also considers the provisions of EITF 04-02 “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets” which concluded that mineral rights are tangible assets. Accordingly, the Company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition of mineral ~~rights and expenses exploration costs and incurred.~~rights. Once a final feasibility study has been completed, additional costs incurred to bring the mine into production are capitalized as development costs. Costs incurred to access ore bodies identified in the current mining plan after production has commenced are considered production costs and are expense d as incurred. Costs incurred to extend production beyond those areas identified in the mining plan where additional reserves have been established are deferred as development costs until the incremental reserves are produced. Capitalized costs are amortized using the unit-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves.

Under United States GAAP, effective February 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) utilizing the modified prospective approach. The impact of adoption of the standard did not materially affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows because the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock options prescribed by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” on February 1, 2003. The Company’s results for the year ended January 31, 2007 were not significantly affected as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on February 1, 2006.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method. Accordingly, there is no difference between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP in the accounting for stock-based compensation for the years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Pursuant to SAB Topic 1:B(1) and the last paragraph of SAB 5:T, the Company is required to report all costs of conducting its business. Accordingly, for fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the Company has recorded the fair value of contributed executive services provided to the Company at no cost as compensation expense, with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus, in the amount of $39,000. Effective for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company is compensating directors for attendance at meetings and therefore no adjustment for fair value of contributed executive services is required.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company capitalizes the depreciation on fixed assets purchased for exploration work as part of the deferred exploration expenditures. As this is a non-cash item, it is excluded from the cash flow in regards to the Investing activities. Under United States GAAP, deferred exploration costs are expensed as incurred and therefore, the amortization on the property equipment, vehicles and furniture is shown as an operating activity, not an investing activity.

The reader is advised to consult Pacific Booker’s audited annual financial statements for the year ended January 31, ~~2006,~~2008, particularly Note ~~17,~~15, for quantification of the differences.

The Company derives interest income on its bank deposits, which depend on the Company's ability to raise funds.

Management periodically, through the exploration process, reviews results both internally and externally through mining related professionals. Decisions to abandon, reduce or expand exploration efforts is based upon many factors including general and specific assessments of mineral deposits, the likelihood of increasing or decreasing those deposits, land costs, estimates of future mineral prices, potential extraction methods and costs, the likelihood of positive or negative changes to the environment, permitting, taxation, labor and capital costs. There cannot be a pre-determined hold period for any property as geological or economic circumstances render each property unique.

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the years presented with US GAAP, except as noted in Note 1715 to the financial statements. The value of the Canadian Dollar in relationship to the US Dollar was ~~$1.14~~$1.00 as of January 31, ~~2006.~~2008.

The Company conducts no Research and Development activities, nor is it dependent upon any patents or licenses.

The Company knows of no trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s operations or financial condition.

Under the Agreement with Noranda (now Falconbridge Ltd., a unit of Xstrata Plc.) dated April 19, 2004, the Company is obligated to issue 250,000 common shares at a minimum fair-value of $1,000,000 to Falconbridge on or before commencement of commercial production. If at the time of issuance the Company’s common share price is below $4.00 per share, the Company is obligated to pay, in cash, the difference between $1,000,000 and the value of the 250,000 common shares issued. This amount is figured by the average trading price which is less than $4.00 per share multiplied by 250,000 common shares.

The Company currently owns a 50% interest in the Morrison Property and is acquiring a further 50% interest from Falconbridge Ltd. under an agreement dated April 19, 2004. The Company’s remaining contractual ~~obligations~~obligation to Falconbridge ~~are to pay Falconbridge $2,500,000 in the following years, with $1,500,000 currently outstanding. The Company also has a lease for its Vancouver office which runs through July 31, 2009.~~

~~Under the Agreement with Falconbridge, the Company~~ is ~~also obligated~~ to issue 250,000 common shares at a minimum fair-value of $1,000,000 to Falconbridge on or before commencement of commercial ~~production. This is an off-balance sheet item and is~~production as discussed under ~~“Off-Balance~~“Off-balance Sheet ~~Arrangements”~~Arrangement” above.

The Company leases its Vancouver office, which runs through April 30, 2009. The Company also leases a vehicle which runs until September 30, 2009.

Table No. 5 lists as of ~~7/15/06~~6/23/08 the names of the Directors of the Company. The Directors have served in their respective capacities since their election and/or appointment and will serve until the next Annual General Meeting or until a successor is duly elected, unless the office is vacated in accordance with the Articles/By-Laws of the Company. At the Annual and ~~Extraordinary~~Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June ~~24, 2005, a new slate of~~16, 2008, all the Directors ~~was elected and new Officers~~ were ~~appointed.~~reelected for the next year. All Directors are citizens of Canada except Gregory Anderson, ~~and~~ Mark Gulbrandson, and Dr. Dennis Simmons, who are citizens of the United States.

Table No. 6 lists, as of ~~7/15/06,~~6/23/08, the names of the Executive Officers of the Company. The Executive Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. All Executive Officers are citizens of Canada except Gregory Anderson, who is a citizen of the United States.

Gregory Anderson was named President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company at the Annual & General Meeting held on June 24, 2005. Mr. Anderson’s background includes corporate finance, investment and brokerage experience, including the last 22 years in mining company finance. From 1997 until his appointment as an officer and director with the Company, he owned GR Consulting, a private corporate consulting business, and assisted the Company with corporate finance and investor relations. Mr. Anderson spends approximately 100% of his time on the Company’s affairs.

Ruth Swan was named Chief Financial Officer of the Company on April 20, 2006. She has over 25 years of bookkeeping experience, with 20 years in the resource sector. She has operated a bookkeeping service since 1986 and since 1996 has provided bookkeeping & financial reporting services to Pacific Booker, and spends approximately 60% of her time on the Company’s affairs.

William Deeks, B.A.Sc., P.Eng., has extensive experience in the mining industry. He is a former senior vice-president of Noranda, Inc. and retired from Noranda in 1992 as Senior Vice-President, Global Business, although he continued as a part-time consultant for Noranda for International Affairs until 1996. He is a past Chairman of the Business Industry Advisory Committee to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris and Chairman of Charles Tennant & Company (Canada) Limited, a chemical distributor. He also serves as the Company’s representative to the Mining Association of Canada, and served on the Association’s 2004 “Towards Sustainable Mining (TSM) Governance” Committee, and was Chair of the 2005 “Trade Policy” Committee. Mr. Deeks is retired, but spends approximately 20% of his equivalent time on the Company’s affairs.

Mark Gulbrandson is the Owner and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Auto Group, a multi-location car dealership located in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota. Mr. Gulbrandson has owned Apple Auto since 1993. It currently employs over 300 people and is one of the top 100 Ford dealers in the United States. Mr. Gulbrandson spends approximately 10% of his time on the Company’s affairs, with the remainder of his time spent on Apple Auto Group business.

John Plourde has over 30 years of investor relations and fund raising experience with various public companies. Mr. Plourde handles investor relations for the Company. ~~He is also a Director of Universal Exploration Corporation, an inactive public company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange NEX board.~~ Mr. Plourde spends approximately 100% of his time on the Company’s affairs.

Dr. Dennis Simmons is Dentist in private practice, General Dentistry. He received his BS, D.D.S from the University of Minnesota in 1972. He is a member of the American Dental Association, Academy of General Dentistry, American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, American Academy of Implant Dentistry, International Congress of Oral Implantology, and Academy of Laser Dentistry. Dr. Simmons spends approximately 5% of his time on the Company’s affairs.

Erik A. Tornquist is an Applied Science Technologist with over 30 years of experience in Natural Gas Operations, Engineering, International Project Management, Human Resources and Training. He has held various management positions with Terasen Gas and Terasen International, most recently as Vice-President of Human Resources and Training for Canadian Energy Services in the Sultanate of Oman. Mr. Tornquist has completed the PUBCO course for establishing and managing public companies at Simon Fraser University. He is currently working on the Company’s feasibility study on the Morrison project, and devotes approximately 100% of his time to the Company’s affairs.

William F. Webster has 40 years of experience in financial management, investment sales and corporate finance. He held financial positions with several major Canadian bank and brokerage firms from 1965 to 1997. Since 1997, he has been self-employed with his own private companies, including market investor, resource developer and property manager. He devotes approximately 5% of his time to the Company’s affairs, with the remainder of his time spent on his self-employed business pursuits.

No Director and/or Executive Officer has been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any governmental agency or administrator or of any court or competent jurisdiction, revoking or suspending for cause any license, permit or other authority of such person or of any corporation of which he is a Director and/or Executive Officer, to engage in the securities business or in the sale of a particular security or temporarily or permanently restraining or enjoining any such person or any corporation of which he is an officer or director from engaging in or continuing any conduct, practice, or employment in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, or convicting such person of any felony or misdemeanor involving a security or any aspect of the securities business or of theft or of any felony.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any two or more Directors or Executive Officers, pursuant to which he was selected as a Director or Executive Officer. No members of the Board of Directors are related.

At the Annual Meeting held on June 26, 2006, the Company agreed to compensate those directors “not actively involved” with Company operations $500 per meeting which they attend, retroactive to June 24, 2005, in their capacity as Directors. Certain Directors have been compensated for consulting and expert services during the most recently completed fiscal year.

At the Company’s Annual and Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholder’s held on June 16, 2008, shareholders approved the adoption of the Company’s new Stock Option Plan dated June 16, 2008 (the “Plan”). The ~~Company does not have a formalized stock option plan for~~purpose of the ~~granting of incentive stock options during the most recently completed fiscal year. However,~~Plan is to assist the Company in compensating, attracting, retaining and motivating personnel, ~~the Company grants stock options to Directors, Executive Officers~~including directors, officers and ~~employees; refer to~~service providers. The Plan is discussed in ITEM #10, "Stock Options".

Table No. 7 sets forth the compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers and members of its administrative body during the last three fiscal years.

The “Other Compensation” for Gregory Anderson, President and CEO, is for investor relations services performed for the Company. A bonus of $100,000 was paid to Mr. Anderson in June 2007.

The “Other Compensation” for Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer, is for accounting and management services.

The “Other Compensation” for Michael Mews, former Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, is for consulting services.

The “Other Compensation” listed for John Plourde, Director, relates to investor relations work performed for the Company. A bonus of $50,000 was paid to Mr. Plourde in June 2007.

The “Other Compensation” listed for Erik Tornquist, Director, is for consulting services related to the Feasibility Study on the Morrison project.

The “Other Compensation” listed for Chris Sampson, former President, relate to consulting engineering work conducted by both by Sampson Engineering, which is 100% owned by Chris Sampson.

The “Other Compensation” listed for J. Paul Stevenson, former President, relates to consulting fees related to government relations and field work.

The “Other Compensation” listed for Perry Munton, former CFO, is for payments for accounting services to Smythe Ratcliffe, Chartered Accountants, of which Perry Munton is a partner.

No funds were set aside or accrued by the Company during Fiscal ~~2006~~2008 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Directors or Executive Officers.

The Company currently has ~~one employee~~three employees and 2 executive officers. The Company’s ~~employee is~~employees are a Technical Support Assistant in the Vancouver office who provides clerical assistance for operations and maintains project technical files and correspondence ~~files.~~files; a Field Project Manager at the Morrison project site who provides on-site management and technical assistance; and a Field Hand at the Morrison project site who reports to the Field Project Manager and provides assistance to consulting firms working on the Feasibility Study.

The Company contracts for certain services, including investor relations and bookkeeping, as well as exploration personnel and camp support services, as needed.

The Company has contracted with a highly experienced geological team of consultants to conduct field work related to its ongoing Feasibility Study on the Morrison ~~project.~~project, as well as certain consultants in the Vancouver Office who provide project management assistance.

The Registrant is a publicly owned Canadian corporation, the shares of which are owned by U.S. residents, Canadian residents and other foreign residents. The Registrant is not controlled by another corporation as described below.

Table No. 9 lists, as of ~~7/15/2006,~~6/2/2008, Directors and Executive Officers who beneficially own the Registrant's voting securities and the amount of the Registrant's voting securities owned by the Directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Of these shares, ~~204,375~~157,999 represent currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional ~~30,625~~28,801 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Of these shares, ~~32,500~~77,391 represent currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional ~~37,500~~4,436 options have been granted but not yet vested. 1,000 of these shares are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants.

Of these shares, ~~102,750~~153,187 represent currently exercisable share purchase ~~options and 17,000 represent currently exercisable share purchase warrants.~~options. An additional ~~19,250~~18,713 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Of these shares, ~~102,750~~153,187 represent currently exercisable share purchase warrants. An additional ~~19,250~~18,713 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Of these shares, ~~244,375~~187,999 represent currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional ~~30,625~~28,801 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Of these shares, ~~104,375~~118,687 represent currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 31,213 options ~~and 10,000~~have been granted but not yet vested. 40,000 of these shares are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants.

Of these shares, 182,999 represent currently exercisable share purchase ~~warrants.~~options. An additional ~~30,625~~28,801 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Of these shares, ~~102,750~~153,187 represent currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional ~~19,250~~18,713 options have been granted but not yet vested.

# Based upon ~~8,182,439~~10,901,789 shares outstanding as of ~~7/15/06~~6/2/08 and stock options and warrants held by each beneficial holder exercisable within sixty days as detailed in Table Number 12, “Stock Options Outstanding” below.

The Board of Directors currently has 34 committees. These are the Audit and Finance Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Disclosure Committee, and the ~~Disclosure~~Compensation Committee.

The Audit and Finance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for the oversight and quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, reporting practices, systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the annual independent audit, and the legal and compliance and ethics programs of the CFO as established by management and the Board. The Committee is required to meet once per quarter, and shall consist of at least three directors, the majority of whom will be non-officers. The Committee currently consists of William Deeks, Mark Gulbrandson, Dennis Simmons, and William Webster.

The Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become board members, recommend director nominees for each annual meeting, recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance standards in the conduct and the business and affairs of the Company, and develop and oversee the annual Board and Board Committee evaluation process. The Committee shall consist of at least 2 Directors, and currently consists of William Deeks, Mark Gulbrandson, Dennis Simmons, and William Webster.

The Disclosure Committee reviews the required disclosure documents and that the Company is meeting all applicable disclosure rules and regulations within the time periods specified. The Committee’s duties include the review and completion of the Form 20-F Annual Report to be filed 6 months after the Company’s fiscal year end. The Disclosure Committee currently consists of William Webster and John Plourde.

The Compensation Committee recommends and reviews the amount of compensation paid to management and directors. The Committee also administers the equity compensation plans and proposes the granting of incentive stock options for review and approval by the Board. The Committee prepares the report on annual compensation for the proxy statement and any other report required by law. The Compensation Committee currently consists of William Deeks, Mark Gulbrandson, Dennis Simmons, and William Webster.

The Company is aware of two persons/companies who beneficially owns 5% or more of the Registrant's voting securities. Table No. 10 lists as of ~~7/15/06,~~6/2/08, the persons and/or companies holding 5% or more beneficial interest in the Company’s outstanding common stock.

~~Includes 244,375~~Of these shares, 187,999 represent currently exercisable ~~stock~~share purchase options. An additional 28,801 options have been granted but not yet vested.

~~Includes 102,750~~Of these shares, 118,687 represent currently exercisable ~~stock~~share purchase options. An additional 31,213 options have been granted but not yet vested. 40,000 of these shares are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants.

Based on ~~8,182,439~~10,901,789 shares outstanding as of ~~7/15/2006~~6/2/2008 and stock options and warrants held by each beneficial holder exercisable within sixty days.

No shareholders of the Company have different voting rights from any other shareholder.

Gregory Anderson, President, CEO and Director, was paid ~~$41,279 (2005~~$127,153 (2007 - ~~$Nil; 2004~~$125,624; 2006 - ~~$Nil)~~$41,279) for investor relations activities. During Fiscal 2008, he also received a $100,000 bonus.

Erik Tornquist, Director, was paid ~~$41,750 (2005~~$78,000 (2007 - ~~$Nil; 2004~~$77,050; 2006 - ~~$Nil)~~$41,750) for consulting services on the Morrison Project. He was also paid ~~$1,375 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - $Nil; ~~2004~~2006 - ~~$Nil)~~$1,375) for general consulting services.

Guo-rong Wang, spouse of Erik Tornquist, Director, was paid $26,130 (2007 - $19,604; 2006 - $Nil) as an Administrative Assistant.

John Plourde, Director, was paid ~~$78,000 (2005~~$132,000 (2007 - ~~$78,000; 2004~~$120,500; 2006 - $78,000) for Investor Relations activities. During Fiscal 2008, he also received a $50,000 bonus.

Michael Mews, former Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, was paid ~~$2,400~~$Nil (2007 - $Nil; 2006 - $2,400) for consulting work related to the Morrison project. He was also paid ~~$24,156~~$Nil (2007 - $23,000; 2006 - $24,156) for general consulting work.

J. Paul Stevenson, Former Chief Executive Officer and Director, was paid ~~$6,000 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - ~~$48,800; 2004~~$Nil; 2006 - ~~$64,000)~~$6,000) for consulting work related to First Nation’s and Government relations. He was paid ~~$17,200 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - ~~$30,000; 2004~~$Nil; 2006 - ~~$14,000)~~$17,200) for general consulting services related to exploration work at the Morrison Project.

Sampson Engineering, a company 100% owned by Chris Sampson, Former President and Director, was paid ~~$13,000 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - ~~$42,600; 2004~~$Nil; 2006 - ~~$51,200)~~$13,000) for consulting work related to exploration at the Morrison Project. Mr. Sampson was also paid ~~$12,800 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - ~~$15,200; 2004~~$Nil; 2006 - ~~$Nil)~~$12,800) for general consulting services related to exploration work at the Morrison Project.

Smythe Ratcliffe, Chartered Accountants, a Company for whom Perry Munton, Former Chief Financial Officer serves as a Partner, was paid ~~$3,800 (2005~~$Nil (2007 - ~~$22,050; 2004 - $4,380)~~$Nil; 2006 – $3,800) for accounting services.

The financial statements as required under ITEM #8 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The audit report of ~~Davidson and~~Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, Chartered Accountants, is included herein immediately preceding the financial statements and schedules.

There have been no significant changes of financial condition since the most recent financial statements dated January 31, ~~2006~~2008, other than described below:

During Fiscal ~~2007~~2009 (up to ~~date,~~and including July 17th), the Company has completed one private placement of 970,200 common share units at a price of $4.00 per unit for total proceeds of $3,880,800. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share at a price of $4.50 on or before April 11, 2008. The Company also issued ~~403,000~~833,700 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of ~~$1,636,650~~$3,807,150 and issued ~~7,000~~101,250 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of ~~$35,000.~~$406,563.

As of January 31, ~~2006,~~2008, the authorized capital of the Company consisted of 100,000,000 common shares. There were ~~8,182,439~~10,901,789 shares issued and outstanding as of ~~July 15, 2006.~~June 2, 2008.

The Company's common shares are issued in registered form and the following information is taken from the records of Computershare Trust Company of Canada. Computershare is located at 510 Burrard Street, 3^rd Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3B9.

On 6/~~30/06,~~2/08, the shareholders' list for the Company's common shares showed ~~154~~160 registered shareholders, including depositories, and ~~8,077,439~~10,901,789 shares issued and outstanding. Of the total shareholders, ~~100~~90 are resident in Canada holding ~~5,678,215~~7,416,445 common shares representing ~~70.30%~~68.03% of the total shares outstanding; 5269 shareholders are resident in the United States holding ~~2,333,224,~~3,455,344, or ~~28.89%~~31.70% of the total shares outstanding; and ~~2 shareholders are~~1 shareholder is resident in other nations, holding ~~66,000~~30,000 common shares, or ~~0.82%~~0.27% of the total shares outstanding.

The Company's common shares are not registered to trade in the United States in the form of American Depository Receipts (ADR's) or similar certificates.

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common shares for the last five years and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain future earnings, if any, for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

The Company's common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada under the stock symbol is “BKM”, and on the American Stock Exchange in New York, New York, under the symbol “PBM”. The CUSIP number is 69403R108.

Table No. 1111a lists the volume of trading and high, low and closing sales prices on the TSX Venture Exchange for the Company's common shares for the last twelve fiscal quarters. There have been no significant trading suspensions of the Company’s common stock during the prior three years.

Table No. 11b lists the volume of trading and high, low and closing sales prices on the American Stock Exchange for the Company's common shares since its listing on August 8, 2007.

Table No. 12 lists, as of ~~7/15/06,~~6/2/08, share purchase warrants outstanding, the exercise price, and the expiration date of the share purchase warrants.

The TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) is a result of the acquisition of the Canadian Venture Exchange by the Toronto Stock Exchange.

The Canadian Venture Exchange was a result of the merger between the Vancouver Stock Exchange and the Alberta Stock Exchange which took place on November 29, 1999. On August 1, 2001, the Toronto Stock Exchange completed its purchase of the Canadian Venture Exchange from its member firms and renamed the Exchange the TSX Venture Exchange. The TSX-V currently operates as a complementary but independent exchange from its parent.

The initial roster of the TSX-V was made up of venture companies previously listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange or the Alberta Stock Exchange and later incorporated junior listings from the Toronto, Montreal and Winnipeg Stock Exchanges. The TSX-V is a venture market as compared to the Toronto Stock Exchange which is Canada’s senior market and the Montreal Exchange which is Canada’s market for derivatives products.

The TSX-V currently has five service centers: Calgary, Toronto, Vancouver, Winnipeg and Montreal. These service centers provide corporate finance, surveillance and marketing expertise. The corporate office for the TSX-V is located in Calgary and the operations office is located in Vancouver.

The TSX-V is a self-regulating organization owned and operated by the TSX Group. It is governed by representatives of its member firms and the public.

The TSX Group acts as a business link between TSX Venture Exchange members, listed companies and investors. CDNX policies and procedures are designed to accommodate companies still in their formative stages and recognize those that are more established. Listings are predominately small and medium sized companies.

Regulation of the TSX Venture Exchange, its member firms and its listed companies is the responsibility of Market Regulation Services Inc. (“RS”) which was created as a joint initiative of The Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. and the Investment Dealers Association of Canada.

RS is recognized as a self-regulatory entity in the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. As a Regulation Service Provider, RS provides independent regulation services to marketplaces (existing exchanges, quotation and trade reporting systems (QTRSs) and alternative trading systems (ATSs) and their participants in Canada that contract with RS Inc. for the provision of regulation services. As a national regulator for the Canadian marketplace, it is the first independent regulator of its kind for the Canadian securities market.

RS administers, oversees and enforces the Universal Market Integrity Rules (“UMIR”). To ensure compliance with UMIR, RS monitors real-time trading operations and market-related activities of marketplaces and participants. RS also enforces compliance with UMIR by investigating alleged rule violations and administering any settlements and hearings that may arise in respect of such violations.

RS's areas of responsibility include Market Surveillance; Operations and General Counsel (Market Policy); and Investigations and Enforcement.

The Market Surveillance division monitors all securities trading for compliance with the Universal Market Integrity Rules and marketplace specific rules. Market Surveillance also investigates irregularities and complaints relating to trading on marketplaces for which RS acts as regulation services provider to ensure a fair and orderly marketplace for all participants. This division is responsible for market supervision, which includes monitoring trading activity and timely disclosure, as well as preliminary investigations and trade desk compliance.

The market surveillance department issues TSX-V notices to inform the public of halts, suspensions, delistings, and other enforcement actions. All TSX-V notices can be found on the TSE/TSX website at www.tse.com. In the public interest, trading halts or suspensions are maintained until the surveillance department is satisfied that there is adequate disclosure of the company’s affairs and a level playing field for investors. By Exchange policy, the department also reviews and approves certain types of transactions for all TSX listed companies. These types of transactions includes option grants, private placements and other share issuances, mergers and acquisitions, property-asset acquisitions and dispositions, loans, bonuses and finder’s fees, changes of business, name changes, stock splits, and related party transactions. If the Exchange’s review of such transactions finds them to be contrary to the public intere st or is in violation of policy, approval for the transaction will be denied and any action taken by the company towards the completion of the transaction must be reversed.

The Operations and General Counsel division is responsible for the development and implementation UMIR as well as providing interpretations of, or exemptions from, UMIR with the goal of promoting market integrity. This division also coordinates all operational activities of RS including strategic planning and overall organizational matters. Finally, the General Counsel's office of this division is responsible for all legal services and matters relating to RS's Board of Directors.

The Investigation and Enforcement division is responsible for conducting investigations and prosecutions of violations of the UMIR and Policies and market integrity and market quality rules specific to the TSX Venture Exchange. Functions of this division include Investigations, Enforcement and Investigative Research.

Investigations focus on activities that may be in breach of the UMIR and/or the rules of the TSX Venture Exchange. The types of violations frequently investigated include high closings, market manipulation, client priority trading violations, unapproved trading, trading in restricted securities and conduct inconsistent with the just and equitable principles of trade.

Requests for investigations come primarily from the Market Surveillance division of RS. Other sources include the provincial securities commissions, the Operations and General Counsel division, marketplaces, and in some instances, the general public. Investigators also lend assistance to investigations conducted by provincial securities commissions.

Once an investigation is complete and a decision has been made to proceed with a prosecution a statement of allegations is served upon the concerned party which references the rule or rules alleged to have been in violation. An Offer of Settlement is also presented to the concerned party, who can either accept or reject the Offer of Settlement. If accepted, the Offer of Settlement must be approved by a hearing panel of RS. The hearing panel may accept the Offer of Settlement or reject it. If the Offer of Settlement is rejected by either the concerned party or by a settlement hearing panel, a Notice of Hearing is issued and served upon the concerned party and the matter proceeds to a hearing before a hearing panel. If the hearing panel determines that an applicable requirement has been violated, it may impose a range of penalties, including a reprimand, a fine, or the restriction, suspension or revocation of access to a marketplace. After a ll hearings, there is an official public notification concerning the outcome of the hearing and the penalty or remedy imposed.

The Investigative Research Division performs in-depth corporate research relating to officers, directors, and significant shareholders of organizations applying to list securities on the TSX Venture Exchange, or applying to obtain access to the marketplace's trading systems. Due diligence is a major function of the Enforcement division. The overall goal is to improve communication and to raise the standards of compliance in the securities trading industry.

Investors in Canada are protected by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (“CIPF”). The CIPF is a private trust fund established to protect customers in the event of the insolvency of a member of any of the following Self-Regulatory Organizations: the TSX Venture Exchange, the Montreal Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange, the Toronto Futures Exchange and the Investment Dealers Association of Canada.

The ~~Company has made application for a listing~~Company’s common shares trade on the American Stock Exchange ~~but has not received approval at this time. Such a listing is dependent upon~~under the ~~Company meeting all~~symbol “PBM”. The shares began trading on the ~~necessary listing requirements of the~~American Exchange ~~including minimum Shareholders’ Equity and Market Capitalization valuations.~~ on August 8, 2007.

In April 2006, the Company was served with notice that a suit was filed against the Company in the British Columbia Supreme Court for breech of contract by Lorne Spence, an original optionor of the Hearne Hill property to the Company. Mr. Spence's action seeks the return of certain mineral claims, or unspecified damages in the alternative. Mr. Spence also sought to include the return of the Company’s Morrison property as part of the suit. In June 2007, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the application to include the Morrison property. The lawsuit regarding the return of the Hearne Hill property is continuing, and the Company is vigorously defending the action. Pacific Booker has also filed a ~~Statement of Defense and a Counterclaim~~counterclaim for $55,356 for breach of an oral agreement pursuant to which Mr. Spence was to provide drilling services to the Company. The Company's Counterclaim seeks damages in the approximate amount of $55,000. To date, Mr. Spence has not filed as Statement of Defense to the Company’s Counterclaim. The Company intends to vigorously defend this legal action.contract.

The Company knows of no other active or pending proceedings against anyone that might materially adversely affect an interest of the Company.

The Company has financed its operations through the issuance of common shares through private placement, the exercise of warrants issued in the private placements, and the exercise of stock options. The changes in the Company’s share capital during the last 3 fiscal years are as follows:

During Fiscal 2008 ended January 31, 2008, the Company issued 926,150 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $3,845,050, and issued 366,750 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $1,711,738. There were no private placements completed during Fiscal 2008.

During Fiscal 2007, the Company completed two private placements of common shares. In April 2006, the Company completed the sale of 970,200 common share units at a price of $4.00 per unit for gross proceeds of $3,880,800. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common stock purchase warrant to purchase an additional share at a price of $4.50 expiring on April 11, 2008. No finder's fee or commission were payable for this private placement. In August 2006, the Company completed the non-brokered private placement of 500,000 common share units at a price of $5.00 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share a price of $6.00 until July 28, 2008. The Company also issued 526,500 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $2,157,425, and issued 12,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $60,000.

During Fiscal 2006, the Company completed 2 private placements. Under the first, the Company issued 228,000 common share units, with each unit consisting of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at $4.15 until March 11, 2007. Proceeds from this placement were $946,200. Under the second placement, the Company sold 520,450 common share units at a price of $4.00 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share at a price of $4.00 until December 2, 2007. Proceeds from the second placement were $2,081,800.

~~During Fiscal 2005, the~~ The Company ~~completed 5 private placements. Under the first, the Company~~also issued ~~300,000 units~~45,000 common shares for mineral property interests at a ~~price~~deemed value of $3.85 per unit for proceeds of $1,155,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share at a price of $4.30 until February 27, 2006. Under the second private placement, the Company issued 23,000 units at a price of $4.00 per unit for proceeds of $92,000. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable at a price of $4.50 until April 22, 2006. Under the third, the Company issued 115,000 units at a price of $4.00 per unit for proceeds of $460,000. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at a price of $4.05 until July 9, 2006. Under the fourth, the Company issued 82,500 units at a price of $4.00 per unit for proceeds of $330,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at a price of $4.25 until October 12, 2006. Under the fifth, the Company issued 77,030 units at a price of $4.15 per unit for proceeds of $319,674.50. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable at a price of $4.15 until January 7, 2007. Of the units issued in the fifth placement, 6,030 of the units were flow-through units and the common share was a flow-through common share.

During Fiscal 2004, the Company completed one private placement. On May 8, 2003, the Company completed the private placement of 127,186 units at a price of $4.00 per unit for proceeds of $508,744. Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable into one common share at a price of $4.00 per share until June 26, 2005.$180,000.

The Company has historically funded a portion of its mineral exploration activities within Canada through the issuance of Flow-Through Common Shares. Section 66 of the Income Tax Act of Canada allows for investment tax credits, at a rate of 15%, applicable to certain mining exploration expenses in Canada pursuant to a Flow-through share issuance agreement. Common shares of exploration companies which are issued under the program are known as “Flow-Through” shares as the Company making the qualified expenditures flow-through such tax credits received to the purchasers of these specific common shares. A Flow-through share investor could apply this tax credit to reduce his or her Canadian Federal income tax payable. In order to apply for the credits, the flow-through shareholder must be resident in Canada and subject to Canada Federal Income Tax for the taxation year in which the credit is being claimed.

The mining exploration expenses that qualify for the investment tax credit under the Flow-through program must be incurred in the scope of mining exploration activities conducted from or above the ground surface in order to determine the existence or location of mineral materials. These minerals include the deposit of common metals or the deposit of minerals for which the Minister of Natural Resources has stated that the principal mineral extract is an industrial mineral contained in a non-stratified deposit. The mining exploration activities that qualify include expenses incurred in order to determine the existence, location, extent, or quality of a mineral resource in Canada, including the prospector costs, the geological, geophysical or geochemical study costs, the costs of steelhead or diamond drilling, by hammering or other methods, and the costs of digging trenches. It is not intended for expenses related to existing mines.

During Fiscal 2005 ended January 31, 2005, the Company sold flow-through common shares for proceeds of $25,024. No flow-through common shares were sold in fiscal 2006, 2007, or 2008 ended January 31.

Stock Options to purchase securities from Registrant can be granted to Directors and Employees of the Company on terms and conditions acceptable to the regulatory authorities in Canada, notably the TSX Venture ~~Exchange.~~Exchange (the “Exchange”).

At the Company’s Annual and Extra-Ordinary Meeting held on June ~~26, 2006,~~16, 2008, Shareholders approved a new Stock Option Plan dated June 16, 2008 (“The Plan”). Under the Plan, the Company may issue Stock options for up to 20% of the common shares outstanding at the effective date of the Plan, or ~~1,583,487~~2,180,357 common shares. ~~These options may be granted from time to time, provided~~The Plan provides that stock options in favor of any one individual may not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding common shares at the time of the grant. No more than an aggregate of 2% of the issued shares of the Company may be granted to any one Consultant in any 12 month period, and no more than 2% of the issued shares of the Company may be granted to all employees conducting investor relations activities, in any 12 month period. Eligibleeligible persons thereunder include any director, officer, employee (full or part-time), consultant or management company employee of the Company or any affiliate of the Company ~~desi gnated~~designated by the directors under the ~~plan.~~Plan. The definition of consultant is the same as that contained in the policies of the Exchange.

The Plan will be administered by the ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors or a committee thereof. The ~~Board~~board of directors will have the authority to determine, ~~which~~among other things, the persons to whom options are granted and the number of such options. ~~The Board~~At the time an option is granted, the board will also determine the exercise price of ~~such options,~~the option which, subject to a minimum price of $0.10, ~~will~~shall be equal to the closing price of the common shares on the Exchange on the day immediately preceding the date of grant, and any vesting criteria or other restrictions with respect to the exercisability of the option. At a minimum, unless the approval of the Exchange is received, options will vest in equal installments, either monthly, quarterly or bi-annually, at the discretion of the board, over a period of 18 months. Subject to any restrictions contained in the Plan, the board may also impose such other terms and conditions as it shall deem necessary or advisable at the time of grant.

The term of the options will be determined by the ~~Board,~~board, but ~~will not~~in any case must be no more than 5five years from the date of grant. ~~The Board, subject~~Options are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. If an optionee ceases to be an eligible person for any reason whatsoever, other than death, the ~~policies~~option (to the extent that it has vested at the time of termination) will terminate and be of no further force and effect. If an optionee dies, the legal representative of the ~~TSX Venture Exchange,~~optionee may ~~determine~~exercise the option (to the extent that it has vested at the time of death) until the earlier of 120 days after the date of death and ~~impose terms upon~~the option’s expiration date.

The Plan provides that the maximum number of common shares which ~~each~~may be reserved for issuance to any participant pursuant to options may not exceed 5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of grant (on a non-diluted basis) less the aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance to such person under any other option to purchase common shares under any other share compensation arrangement. Under the Plan, the maximum number of common shares that may be issued to any participant, or to one insider and the insider’s associates, within a one year period pursuant to option exercises may not exceed 5% of the outstanding issue.

The maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to all the insiders of the Company pursuant to share options is limited to 20% of the common shares outstanding at the time of the grant ~~will vest.~~(on a non-diluted basis) less the aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance to insiders under any other share compensation arrangement.

The names and titles of the Directors/Executive Officers of the Registrant to whom outstanding stock options have been granted and the numbers of common shares subject to such options are set forth in Table No. 13 as of ~~7/15/2006,~~6/2/2008, as well as the number of options granted to Directors and all employees as a group.

The Company was originally incorporated under the Company Act of British Columbia on February 18, 1983. Due to changes to provincial laws, the Company was required to adopt new Articles of Incorporation under the new British Columbia Corporations Act. At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on July 16, 2004, the Company adopted amended Articles of Incorporation under the B.C. Corporations Act (the “Act”).

There are no restrictions on the business the company may carry on in the Articles of Incorporation.

Under the Company’s articles and bylaws a director is not allowed to vote on any transaction or contract with the Company in which has a disclosable interest unless all directors have a disclosable interest in that transaction.

Part 16 of the Company’s bylaws address the duties of the directors, including the borrowing powers. Directors must manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company and have the authority to exercise all such powers which are not required to be exercised by the shareholders, or as governed by the Act.

There are no age limit requirements pertaining to the retirement or non-retirement of directors.

The rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each class of the Company’s shares are as follows:

The authorized shares of common stock of the Company are of the same class and, once issued, rank equally as to dividends, voting powers, and participation in assets. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be acted upon by the shareholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors, in its discretion, out of funds legally available therefore.

Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of common stock are entitled to receive pro rata the assets of Company, if any, remaining after payments of all debts and liabilities. No shares have been issued subject to call or assessment. There are no pre-emptive or conversion rights and no provisions for redemption or purchase for cancellation, surrender, or sinking or purchase funds.

The Company may by special resolution, create, define, and attach special rights or restrictions on any shares and by special resolution and by otherwise complying with any applicable provision of its Memorandum or these Articles to vary or abrogate any special rights and restrictions attached to any shares, but no right or special right attached to any issued shares shall be prejudiced or interfered with unless all members holding shares of each affected class consent thereto in writing, or unless a resolution consenting thereto is passed at a separate class meeting of the holders of the shares of each such class by a majority of three-fourths of the rest of such shares.

An annual general meeting shall be held once every calendar year at such time (not being more than 13 months after holding the last preceding annual meeting) and place as may be determined by the Directors. The Directors may, as they see fit, to convene an extraordinary general meeting. An extraordinary general meeting, if requisitioned in accordance with the Company Act, shall be convened by the Directors or, if not convened by the Directors, may be convened by the requisitionists as provided in the Company Act.

There are no provisions that would have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of the Company.

There is no special ownership threshold above which an ownership position must be disclosed.

The Company considers the following as material contracts, which have been entered into by the Company which are currently in effect:

Option Agreement for Hearne Hill and Morrison between Booker Gold (now Pacific Booker Minerals) and Noranda Mining and Exploration (Now Falconbridge Ltd.) dated October 22, 1997.

Agreement between the Company and Windbourne International Capita Management Ltd. dated June 15, 1995.

Agreement between the Company, Lorne Spence, Jacquie Bland and David Chapman dated January 28, 1999.

Agreement between the Company and Noranda (Now Falconbridge Ltd.) on the Morrison Property dated April 19, 2004.

All of the Material Contracts have been previously filed as exhibits to the Company’s 20-F Registration Statement.

Except as discussed in ITEM #9, the Company is not aware of any Canadian federal or provincial laws, decrees, or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-Canadian holders of the common shares. There are no limitations on the right of non-Canadian owners to hold or vote the common shares imposed by Canadian federal or provincial law or by the charter or other constituent documents of the Company.

TheInvestment Canada Act(the"IC Act") governs acquisitions of Canadian business by a non-Canadian person or entity. TheIC Actrequires a non-Canadian (as defined in theIC Act) making an investment to acquire control of a Canadian business, the gross assets of which exceed certain defined threshold levels, to file an application for review with the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada. TheIC Actprovides, among other things, for a review of an investment in the event of acquisition of "control" in certain Canadian businesses in the following circumstances:

1. If the investor is a non-Canadian and is a national of a country belonging to the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") and/or the World Trade Organization ("WTO") ("NAFTA or WTO National"), any direct acquisition having an asset value exceeding $179,000,000 is reviewable. This amount is subject to an annual adjustment on the basis of a prescribed formula in theIC Actto reflect inflation and real growth within Canada. This threshold level does not apply in certain sections of Canadian industry, such as uranium, financial services (except insurance), transportation services and cultural services (i.e. the publication, distribution or sale of books, magazines, periodicals (other than printing or typesetting businesses), music in print or machine readable form, radio, television, cable and satellite services; the publication, distribution, sale or exhibition of film or video recordings on audio or video music recordings), to which lower thresholds as prescribed in theIC Actare applicable.

2. If the investor is a non-Canadian and is not a NAFTA or WTO National, any direct acquisition having an asset value exceeding $5,000,000 and any indirect acquisition having an asset value exceeding $50,000,000 is reviewable.

3. If the investor is a non-Canadian and is NAFTA or WTO National, an indirect acquisition of control is reviewable if the value of the assets of the business located in Canada represents more than 50% of the asset value of the transaction or the business is involved in uranium, financial services, transportation services or cultural services (as set forth above).

Finally, certain transactions prescribed in theIC Actare exempted from review altogether.

In the context of the Company, in essence, three methods of acquiring control of a Canadian business are regulated by theIC Act: (i) the acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets used in carrying on business in Canada; (ii) the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of voting shares of a Canadian corporation carrying on business in Canada; or (iii) the acquisition of voting shares of an entity which controls, directly or indirectly, another entity carrying on business in Canada.

An acquisition of a majority of the voting shares of a Canadian entity, including a corporation, is deemed to be an acquisition of control under theIC Act. However, under theIC Act, there is a rebuttable presumption that control is acquired if one-third of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation or an equivalent undivided interest in the voting shares of such corporation are held by a non-Canadian person or entity. An acquisition of less than one-third of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation is deemed not to be an acquisition of control. An acquisition of less than a majority, but one-third or more, of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation is presumed to be an acquisition of control unless it can be established that, on the acquisition, the Canadian corporation is not, in fact, controlled by the acquirer through the ownership of voting shares. For partnerships, trusts, joint ventures or ot her unincorporated Canadian entities, an acquisition of less than a majority of the voting interests is deemed not to be an acquisition of control.

In addition, if a Canadian corporation is controlled by a non-Canadian, the acquisition of control of any other Canadian corporation by such corporation may be subject to the prior approval of the Investment Review Division, unless it can be established that the Canadian corporation is not in fact controlled by the acquirer through the ownership of voting shares.

Where an investment is reviewable under theIC Act, the investment may not be implemented unless it is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. If an applicant is unable to satisfy the Minister responsible for Industry Canada that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, the applicant may not proceed with the investment. Alternatively, an acquirer may be required to divest control of the Canadian business that is the subject of the investment.

In addition to the foregoing, theIC Actprovides for formal notification under theIC Actof all other acquisitions of control by Canadian businesses by non-Canadian investors. The notification process consists of filing a notification within 30 days following the implementation of an investment, which notification is for information, as opposed to review, purposes.

The following summary of the material Canadian federal income tax consequences generally applicable in respect of the common stock reflects the Company’s opinion. The tax consequences to any particular holder of common stock will vary according to the status of that holder as an individual, trust, corporation or member of a partnership, the jurisdiction in which that holder is subject to taxation, the place where that holder is resident and, generally, according to that holder’s particular circumstances. This summary is applicable only to holders who are resident in the United States, have never been resident in Canada, deal at arm’s length with the Company, hold their common stock as capital property and who will not use or hold the common stock in carrying on business in Canada. Special rules, which are not discussed in this summary, may apply to a United States holder that is an issuer that carries on bu siness in Canada and elsewhere.

This summary is based upon the provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada and the regulations thereunder (collectively, the "Tax Act" or “ITA”)and the Canada-United States Tax Convention (the “Tax Convention”) as at the date of the Annual Report and the current administrative practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. This summary does not take into account provincial income tax consequences.

Management urges each holder to consult his own tax advisor with respect to the income tax consequences applicable to him in his own particular circumstances.

The summary below is restricted to the case of a holder (a “Holder”) of one or more common shares (“Common Shares”) who for the purposes of the Tax Act is a non-resident of Canada, holds his Common Shares as capital property and deals at arm’s length with the Company.

A Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax (“Part XIII Tax”) equal to 25%, or such lower rates as may be available under an applicable tax treaty, of the gross amount of any dividend paid or deemed to be paid on his Common Shares. Under the Tax Convention, the rate of Part XIII Tax applicable to a dividend on Common Shares paid to a Holder who is a resident of the United States is, if the Holder is a company that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company, 5% and, in any other case, 15% of the gross amount of the dividend. The Company will be required to withhold the applicable amount of Part XIII Tax from each dividend so paid and remit the withheld amount directly to the Receiver General for Canada for the account of the Holder.

A Holder who disposes of Common Shares, including by deemed disposition on death, will not be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain thereby realized unless the common Share constituted “taxable Canadian property” as defined by the Tax Act. Generally, a common share of a public corporation will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Holder unless he held the common share as capital property used by him carrying on a business in Canada, or he or persons with whom he did not deal at arm’s length alone or together held or held options to acquire, at any time within the 60 months preceding the disposition, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company.

A Holder who is a resident of the United States and realizes a capital gain on disposition of Common Shares that was taxable Canadian property will nevertheless, by virtue of the Treaty, generally be exempt from Canadian tax thereon unless (a) more than 50% of the value of the Common Shares is derived from, or from an interest in, Canadian real estate, including Canadian mineral resources properties, (b) the Common Shares formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment that the Holder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding disposition, or (c) the Holder (i) was a resident of Canada at any time within the ten years immediately preceding the disposition, and for a total of 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years, preceding the disposition, and (ii) owned the Common Shares when he ceased to be resident in Canada.

A Holder who is subject to Canadian tax in respect of a capital gain realized on disposition of Common Shares must include one half of the capital gain (“taxable capital gain”) in computing his taxable income earned in Canada. The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct one half of any capital loss (“allowable capital loss”) arising on disposition of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of disposition in respect to taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so deductible, from such taxable capital gains of any of the three preceding years or any subsequent year.

The following is a discussion of material United States Federal income tax consequences, under the law, generally applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) of common shares of the Company. This discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences.

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service (“IRS) rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possible on a retroactive basis, at any time. In addition, the discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, or recently proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. The discussion is for general information only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of common shares of the Company. Each holder and prospective holder of common shares of the Company is advised to consult their own tax advisors about the fe deral, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company applicable to their own particular circumstances.

As used herein, a (“U.S. Holder”) includes a holder of common shares of the Company who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, an estate whose income is taxable in the United States irrespective of source or a trust subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and control of a United States fiduciary as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code. This summary does not address the tax consequences to, and U.S. Holder does not include, persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals, persons or entities that have a “functional currency” othe r than the U.S. dollar, shareholders who hold common shares as part of a straddle, hedging or conversion transaction, and shareholders who acquired their common shares through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services. This summary is limited to U.S. Holders who own common shares as capital assets. This summary does not address the consequences to a person or entity holding an interest in a shareholder or the consequences to a person of the ownership, exercise or disposition of any options, warrants or other rights to acquire common shares.

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distributions (including constructive dividends) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distributions on the date of receipt (based on the exchange rate on such date), to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal Income tax liability or, alternatively, individuals may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal taxable income by those individuals who itemize deductions. (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below). To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. Dividend income will be taxed at marginal tax rates applicable to ordinary income while preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder which is an individual, estate or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains for a U.S. Holder which is a corporation.

In the case of foreign currency received as a dividend that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Generally any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale of other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars, will be ordinary income or loss.

Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations. A U.S. Holder which is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company (unless the Company qualifies as a “foreign personal holding company” or a “passive foreign investment company”, as defined below) if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company. The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations which are beyond the scope of this discussion.

Under current Treasury Regulations, dividends paid on the Company’s common shares, if any, generally will not be subject to information reporting and generally will not be subject to U.S. backup withholding tax. However, dividends and the proceeds from a sale of the Company’s common shares paid in the U.S. through a U.S. or U.S. related paying agent (including a broker) will be subject to U.S. information reporting requirements and may also be subject to the 31% U.S. backup withholding tax, unless the paying agent is furnished with a duly completed and signed Form W-9. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

For individuals whose entire income from sources outside the United States consists of qualified passive income, the total amount of creditable foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year does not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return) and an election is made under section 904(j), the limitation on credit does not apply.

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer’s income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign income taxes (or taxes in lieu of income tax) paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during the year. There are significant and complex limitations which apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder’s United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holder’s foreign source income bears to his/her or its worldwide taxable income in the determination of the application of this limitation. The various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income such as “passive income”, “high withholding tax interest”, “financial services income”, “shipping income”, and certain other classifications of income. Dividends distributed by the Company will generally

constitute “passive income” or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “financial services income” for these purposes. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and management urges holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company to consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between (I) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder’s tax basis in the common shares of the Company. Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of U.S. Holders, which are individuals, estates or trusts. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are capital assets in the hands of the U.S. Holder, which will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder. Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year. Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations. For U.S. Holders, which are not corporations, any unused portion of such net c apital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted, but individuals may not carry back capital losses. For U.S. Holders, which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.

In the following circumstances, the above sections of the discussion may not describe the United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from the holding and disposition of common shares of the Company.

If at any time during a taxable year more than 50% of the total combined voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States and 60% (50% after the first tax year) or more of the Company’s gross income for such year was derived from certain passive sources (e.g. from interest income received from its subsidiaries), the Company would be treated as a “foreign personal holding company.” In that event, U.S. Holders that hold common shares of the Company would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such passive income to the extent the Company does not actually distribute such income.

The Company does not believe that it currently has the status of a “foreign personal holding company”. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be considered a foreign personal holding company for the current or any future taxable year.

If 50% or more of the combined voting power or total value of the Company’s outstanding shares are held, actually or constructively, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States

domestic partnerships or corporations, or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(31), and the Company is found to be engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, commodities, or any interest therein, it is possible that the Company might be treated as a “foreign investment company” as defined in Section 1246 of the Code, causing all or part of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder selling or exchanging common shares of the Company to be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains.

As a foreign corporation with U.S. Holders, the Company could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), as defined in Section 1297 of the Code, depending upon the percentage of the Company’s income which is passive, or the percentage of the Company’s assets which is held for the purpose of producing passive income.

Certain United States income tax legislation contains rules governing PFICs, which can have significant tax effects on U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations. These rules do not apply to non-U.S. shareholders. Section 1297 (a) of the Code defines a PFIC as a corporation that is not formed in the United States and, for any taxable year, either (I) 75% or more of its gross income is “passive income”, which includes interest, dividends and certain rents and royalties or (ii) the average percentage, by fair market value (or, if the company is a controlled foreign corporation or makes an election, by adjusted tax basis), of its assets that produce or are held for the production of “passive income” is 50% or more. The taxation of a US shareholder who owns stock in a PFIC is extremely complex and is therefore beyond the scope of this discussion. Management urges US persons to consult with their own t ax advisors with regards to the impact of these rules.

A Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) is a foreign corporation more than 50% of whose stock by vote or value is, on any day in the corporation’s tax year, owned (directly or indirectly) by U.S. Shareholders. If more than 50% of the voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote is owned, actually or constructively, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships and corporations or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts, each of whom own actually or constructively 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company could be treated as a “controlled foreign corporation” under Subpart F of the Code. This classification would affect many complex results, one of which is the inclusion of certain income of a CFC, which is subject to current U.S. tax. The United States generally taxes United States Shareholders of a CFC currently on their pro rata shares of the Subpart F income of the CFC. Such United States Shareholders are generally treated as having received a current distribution out of the CFC’s Subpart F income and are also subject to current U.S. tax on their pro rata shares of the CFC’s earnings invested in U.S. property. The foreign tax credit described above may reduce the U.S. tax on these amounts. In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from the sale or exchange of shares by a U.S. Holder of common shares of the Corporation which is or was a United States Shareholder at any time during the five-year period ending with the sale or exchange is treated as ordinary income to the extent of earnings and profits of the Company (accumulated in corporate tax years beginning after 1962, but only while the shares were held and while the Company was “controlled”) attributable to the shares sold or exchanged. If a foreign corporation is both a PFIC and a CFC, the foreign corporation generally will not be tre ated as a PFIC with respect to the United States Shareholders of the CFC. This rule generally will be effective for taxable years of United States Shareholders beginning after 1997 and for taxable years of foreign corporations ending with or within such taxable years of United States Shareholders. The PFIC provisions continue to apply in the case of PFIC that is also a CFC with respect to the U.S. Holders that are less than 10% shareholders. Because of the complexity of Subpart F, a more detailed review of these rules is outside of the scope of this discussion.

The amount of any backup withholding will not constitute additional tax and will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax liability.

Filing of Information Returns. Under a number of circumstances, United States Investor acquiring shares of the Company may be required to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service Center where they are required to file their tax returns with a duplicate copy to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255. In particular, any United States Investor who becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file such a return. Other filing requirements may apply, and management urges United States Investors to consult their own tax advisors concerning these requirements.

All documents incorporated and referred by reference in this 20-F Annual Report may be viewed at the Company’s Executive Office located at #1702 – 1166 Alberni Street, Vancouver, British Columbia.

The company’s mineral properties are all currently at the exploration stage and the Company’s operations are limited to exploring those properties. Therefore, Pacific Booker’s market risks are minimal.

The Company competes with other mining companies for exploration properties, joint venture agreements and for the acquisition of attractive gold companies. There is a risk that this competition could increase the difficulty of concluding a negotiation on terms that the Company considers acceptable.

~~The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision~~Disclosure Controls and ~~with the participation of the~~Procedures

The Company’s management, including the ~~Company’s~~ President, has reviewed and ~~Chief Financial Officer, of~~evaluated the effectiveness of the ~~design and operation of the~~ Company’s ~~“disclosure~~disclosure controls and ~~procedures” [as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)]~~procedures as of January 31, 2008. Based on that review and evaluation, the ~~end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, it was~~President has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ~~timely alerting them to~~providing management with all material information ~~relating to the Company~~ required to be ~~included~~disclosed in this annual report on a timely basis.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management’s framework for evaluating the effectiveness of its internal controls is based upon the criteria established inInternal Control— Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

As at January 31, 2008, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting are effective and that there were no material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s ~~SEC filings,~~registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that ~~information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.~~permit the company to provide only management’s report in this Form 20-F Annual Report.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

~~There was~~has been no change in the ~~Company’s~~Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~Company’s most recently completed fiscal year ended January 31, 2006~~period covered by this Form 20-F, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. ~~Nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Company's internal controls requiring corrective actions.~~

The Company’s Audit Committee currently consists of ~~three~~four members, all of whom are financially literate. William F. Webster meets the requirements of “audit committee financial expert. Mr. Webster is “Independent” as defined by the rules of the American Stock Exchange.

The Board of Directors has adopted a written Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies equally to all employees, officers, directors, consultants, contractors, suppliers and others acting on behalf of the Company. The Board also relies upon the selection of persons to and as directors, officers and employees who they consider to meet the highest ethical standards.

A copy of Pacific Booker’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct has been filed as an exhibit to ~~this annual report.~~the Company Fiscal 2006 20-F Annual Report.

Table Number 14 discloses the fees billed to the Company by its independent auditors, Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, Chartered Accountants, for Fiscal 2008, and Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered ~~Accountant,~~Accountants, for ~~each of the last two years.~~Fiscal Year 2007.

Item 16E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the years presented with US GAAP, except as disclosed in Note 1715 to the financial statements.

The financial statements as required under ITEM #17 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The audit report of ~~Davidson~~Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, ~~LLP,~~ Chartered ~~Accountant,~~Accountants, is included herein immediately preceding the financial statements.

(A1) The financial statements thereto as required under ITEM #17 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The audit report of ~~Davidson~~Cinnamon Jang Willoughby & Company, ~~LLP,~~ Chartered Accountants, for the audited financial statements is included herein immediately preceding the audited financial statements.

Statements of Operations for the years ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005,~~2008, 2007, and ~~2004.~~2006.

Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005,~~2008, 2007, and ~~2004.~~2006.

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005,~~2008, 2007, and ~~2004.~~2006.

We have audited the balance sheets of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. as at January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) to identify circumstances when there is a restatement that has a material effect on the comparability of the Company’s financial statements such as the restatement described in Note 17, or when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated April 12, 2006 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions or require a reference to such a restatement in the auditors' report when they are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

~~1200 - 609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V7Y 1G6~~

	2006	2005

			2008	2007

ASSETS


Current
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 384,746	$ 443,754	$ 5,500,296	$ 3,960,047
Receivables	38,196	107,731	140,465	136,690
Exploration advances	89,013	225,000
Prepaids and deposits	20,359	5,543
Prepaid expenses and deposits			35,037	134,154

Total current assets	532,314	782,028
			5,675,798	4,230,891
Mineral property interests(Note 3)	4,832,500	5,698,500

Deferred exploration costs (Note 4)	7,137,683	12,373,828

Property and equipment (Note 5)	54,564	18,223

Mineral property interests(Note 4)			4,832,500
Deferred exploration costs (Note 5)			12,792,612	9,445,857
Equipment, vehicles and furniture (Note 6)			35,793	49,643
Reclamation deposits	118,600	72,500	118,600

Total assets	$ 12,675,661	$ 18,945,079	$ 23,455,303	$ 18,677,491


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			$ 589,965	$ 440,415
Amounts owing to related parties (Note 8)			27,662	42,451

			617,627	482,866

Shareholders' equity
Capital stock (Note 7)
Authorized:
100,000,000 common shares without par value
Issued and outstanding
10,103,839 common shares (2007 – 8,810,939)			37,795,014	32,080,329
Contributed surplus (Note 7)			2,368,422	1,218,149
Deficit			(17,325,760)	(15,103,853)

			22,837,676	18,194,625

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity			$ 23,455,303	$ 18,677,491

	2006	2005	2004	2008	2007	2006

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss for the year	$ (8,883,273)	$ (902,759)	$ (327,241)	$ (2,221,907)	$ (1,365,664)	$ (8,883,273)
Items not affecting cash:
Amortization	8,759	3,869	4,405	14,979	15,928	8,759
Loss on asset disposal				-	3,786	-
Stock-based compensation	417,757	212,914	-	1,248,170	587,478	417,757
Write-off of accounts payable	-	(31,322)	-
Write-off of exploration advances	-	20,044	-
Gain on settlement of debt				-	(50,000)	-
Write-off of mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs	7,851,288	250,000	10,735	-		7,851,288

Changes in non-cash working capital items:
Decrease in receivables	69,535	180,377	145,324
(Increase) decrease in receivables				(3,775)	(98,494)	69,535
(Increase) decrease in prepaids and deposits	(14,816)	21,531	23,354	99,117	(113,795)	(14,816)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(77,678)	(172,487)	111,141	9,801	9,781	(77,678)
Increase (decrease) in amounts owing to related parties	6,210	(80,481)	72,446	(18,525)	18,353	6,210

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(622,218)	(498,314)	40,164
Net cash used in operating activities				(872,140)	(992,627)	(622,218)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of capital stock	2,453,225	2,119,275	518,744	5,616,788	8,318,225	2,453,225
Share subscriptions received in advance	280,000	574,775	275,400	-		280,000
Due to related parties	-	(36,700)	36,700
Obligations under capital leases	-	(588)	(2,433)
Repayment of long term debt	(1,000,000)	-	-	-	(1,450,000)	(1,000,000)

Net cash provided by financing activities	1,733,225	2,656,762	828,411	5,616,788	6,868,225	1,733,225

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs (net of recovery)	(1,018,559)	(1,760,122)	(896,558)	(3,200,852)	(2,282,049)	(1,018,559)
Restricted cash	-		37,500
Exploration advances	(56,250)	25,000	(1,917)	-		(56,250)
Reclamation deposits	(46,100)	-		-		(46,100)
Purchase of property and equipment	(49,106)	-	(4,439)
Proceeds from sale of equipment				-	467	-
Purchase of equipment, vehicles or furniture				(3,547)	(18,715)	(49,106)

Net cash used in investing activities	(1,170,015)	(1,735,122)	(865,414)	(3,204,399)	(2,300,297)	(1,170,015)

Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year	(59,008)	423,326	3,161	1,540,249	3,575,301	(59,008)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	443,754	20,428	17,267	3,960,047	384,746	443,754

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$ 384,746	$ 443,754	$ 20,428	$ 5,500,296	$ 3,960,047	$ 384,746

Cash paid for income taxes	$ -	$ -
Cash paid for interest	-	618	271

The Company was incorporated under the Company Act of British Columbia and its principal business activity is the exploration of its mineral property interests, with its principal mineral property interests located in Canada.

The ability of the Company to realize the costs it has incurred to date on its mineral property interests is dependent upon the Company being able to identify a commercial ore body, to finance its exploration costs and to resolve any environmental, regulatory or other constraints which may hinder the successful development of the mineral property interest. To date, the Company has not earned ~~significant revenues~~any revenue and is considered to be in the advanced exploration stage.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. These financial statements do not include the adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company has incurred losses since inception and the ability of the Company to continue as a going-concern depends upon its ability to develop profitable operations and to continue to raise adequate financing. Management is actively targeting sources of additional financing through alliances with financial, exploration and mining entities, or other business and financial transactions which would assure continuation of the Company’s operations and exploration programs. In order for the Company to meet its liabilities as they come due and to continue its operations, the Company is solely dependent upon its ability to generate such financing.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations. Should the Company be unable to realize on its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts recorded on the balance sheets.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). The significant accounting policies adopted by the Company are as follows:

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported ~~amounts~~amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The most significant estimates made by management relate to amounts recorded for the depreciation of capital assets, measurement of stock-based compensation, the recoverability of mineral properties, and the provision for the asset retirement obligation.

The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

The monetary assets and liabilities of the Company that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the exchange rates approximating those in effect on the date of the transactions. Exchange gains and losses arising on translation are included in the statement of operations.

Cash ~~and cash equivalents consists of~~includes cash on hand and demand deposits. Cash equivalents includes short-term, highly liquid investments ~~with original maturities~~that are readily convertible to known amounts of ~~three months or less.~~cash and have a maturity date of less than 90 days and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. As at January 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not have cash equivalents.

The Company establishes an allowance for receivables on a specific account basis. No allowance for receivables was recorded by the Company as at January 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2005.~~2007.

~~The Company records mineral property interests, which consist of the right to explore for mineral deposits, at cost. The Company records deferred exploration~~All costs ~~which consist of costs attributable to the exploration of mineral property interests, at cost. All direct and indirect costs relating~~related to the acquisition, exploration and ~~exploration~~development of ~~these~~ mineral ~~property interests~~properties are capitalized onby property. If economically recoverable ore reserves are developed, capitalized costs of the ~~basis~~related property are reclassified as mining assets and amortized using the unit of ~~specific claim blocks until~~production method. When a property is abandoned, all related costs are written off to operations. If, after management review, it is determined that the ~~mineral property interests to which they relate are placed into production, the mineral property interests are disposed~~carrying amount of ~~through sale or where management has determined there to be an impairment. If~~ a mineral property ~~interest~~ is ~~abandoned, the~~impaired, that property is written down to its estimated net realizable value. A mineral property ~~interest and deferred exploration costs will be written off to operations in the period of abandonment.~~

~~Mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs~~ ~~(cont'd…)~~

~~On an ongoing basis, the capitalized costs are~~is reviewed ~~on a property-by-property basis to consider if there is any impairment on the subject mineral property interest. Management’s determination~~ for impairment ~~is based on: i) whether the Company’s exploration programs on the mineral property interests have significantly changed, such~~whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that previously identified resource targets are no longer being pursued; ii) whether exploration results to date are promising and whether additional exploration work is being planned in the foreseeable future or iii) whether remaining lease terms are insufficient to conduct necessary studies or exploration work.its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The recorded cost of mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs is based on cash paid and the value of share consideration issued for mineral property interest acquisitions and exploration costs incurred. The recorded amount may not reflect recoverable value as this will be dependent on future development programs, the nature of the mineral deposit, commodity prices, adequate funding and the ability of the Company to bring its projects into production.

Cost recoveries consist of mining tax credits from the Province of British Columbia. Claims for tax credits are accrued upon the Company attaining reasonable assurance of collection from Canada Revenue Agency#

JANUARY 31, 2008 and ~~from the Province of British Columbia. As at January 31, 2006 and 2005, cost recoveries related solely to the Morrison claims and are recorded as a cost recovery of deferred exploration costs.~~2007

The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the year in which it is incurred when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The carrying amount of the related long-lived asset is increased by the same amount as the liability.

Changes in the liability for an asset retirement obligation due to the passage of time will be measured by applying an interest method of allocation. The amount will be recognized as an increase in the liability and an accretion expense in the statement of operations. Changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company provides for amortization annually as follows:

The fair value of stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the stock options.

The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute the dilutive effect of options, warrants and similar instruments. Under this method, the dilutive effect on earnings per share is recognized on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the year. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended January 31, ~~2006~~2008 do not include the ~~1,595,980 (2005~~1,286,500 (2007 – ~~974,716; 2004~~2,212,650; 2006 – ~~447,686)~~1,595,980) warrants outstanding and the ~~1,113,000 (2005~~1,564,077 (2007 – ~~1,135,000; 2004~~1,471,500; 2006 – ~~474,000)~~1,113,000) stock options ~~outstanding.~~outstanding as the inclusion of these amounts would be anti-dilutive.

Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year.

Future income taxes are recorded using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment or enactment occurs. To the extent that the Company does not consider it more likely than not that a future tax asset will be recovered, it provides a valuation allowance against the excess.

Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with Canadian income tax legislation.

Effective ~~March 19, 2004,~~February 1, 2007 the Company adopted ~~Emerging Issues Committee 146 “Flow-Through Shares”~~the following new accounting standards issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”); “Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement” (Section 3855), “Financial Instruments - Disclosure and Presentation” (Section 3861), and “Comprehensive Income” (Section 1530). These new standards have been adopted prospectively. Adoption of these standards did not impact February 1, 2007 opening balances.

This section establishes standards for the recognition, measurement disclosure and presentation of financial instruments. Under the new standard, financial assets and liabilities are initially recognized at fair value and are subsequently measured based on their classification as held-for-trading, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale, or other financial liabilities, as described below:

Financial assets and financial liabilities that ~~dictates~~are purchased and incurred with the ~~accounting treatment on renunciation~~intention of generating profits in the ~~tax deductibility of the qualifying expenditures that give rise~~near term are classified as held-for-trading. Any financial instrument can be designated as held for trading as long as its fair value can be reliably measured. These instruments are measured at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value included in earnings.

The company has classified cash and cash equivalents as held-for-trading, which accordingly are carried at their fair values. Held-for-trading assets are not subject to ~~taxable temporary differences. The change in accounting policy was applied prospectively. When the Company renounces flow-through expenditures, a portion of the Company’s future income tax~~significant credit, foreign exchange or interest rate risk.

Financial assets that ~~were not recognized~~have a fixed maturity date and fixed or determinable payments, where the company intends and has the ability to hold the financial asset to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Any gains and losses arising from the sale of held-to-maturity financial assets are included in ~~previous years, due to~~earnings. Currently, the ~~recording of a valuation allowance, will be recognized as a recovery of future income taxes in the statement of operations.~~company has no held-to-maturity financial assets.

Items classified as loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Any gains or losses on the realization of loans and receivables are included in earnings.

The company has classified receivables and deposits, which are accordingly measured at amortized cost. Due to their short-term natures, the fair values of receivables approximate their carrying values, and they are not subject to significant credit or interest rate risk.

Available-for-sale assets are those financial assets that are not classified as held-for-trading, held-to-maturity or loans or receivables, and are carried at fair value. Any gains or losses arising from the change in fair value are recorded as other comprehensive income. Available-for-sale securities are written down to fair value through earnings whenever it is necessary to reflect other-than-temporary impairment. Cumulative gains and losses arising upon the sale of the instrument are included in earnings.

The company has classified reclamation deposits as available-for-sale, which are accordingly carried at their fair values. Available-for-sale assets are not subject to significant credit, foreign exchange or interest rate risk

Financial liabilities that are not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as other financial liabilities, and are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Any gains or losses arising from the realization of other financial liabilities are included in earnings.

The company has classified accounts payable and accrued liabilities as other financial instruments, which are accordingly carried at amortized cost. Due to their short-term natures, the fair values of other financial liabilities approximate their carrying values, and they are not subject to significant credit, foreign exchange or interest rate risk.

This section establishes standards for presentation of financial instruments and identifies the information which should be disclosed about them. Under the new standards, policies followed for years prior to the effective date are generally not reversed, and therefore the comparative figures have not been restated.

This section establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income, which is comprised of net earnings or loss and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income represents the change in net equity for the period that arises from unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale financial instruments, and changes in the fair market value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Amounts included in other comprehensive income are shown net of tax. Cumulative changes in other comprehensive income are included in accumulated other comprehensive income which is presented (if applicable) as a new category in shareholders’ equity. The Company did not have any transactions during the year ended January 31, 2008 that give rise to other comprehensive income, and therefore has no balance of other accumulated other comprehensive income.

Because the financial instruments are not subject to significant credit, foreign exchange or interest rate risk, the company has not adopted risk management policies.

Title to mineral property interests involves certain inherent risks due to the difficulties of determining the validity of certain claims as well as the potential for problems arising from the frequently ambiguous conveyancing history characteristic of many mineral claims. The Company has investigated title to all of its mineral property interests and, to the best of its knowledge, title to all of its interests are in good standing. The mineral property interests in which the Company has committed to earn an interest are located in Canada.

The Company holds a 100% interest in the Hearne Hill claims located in the Omineca District of the Province of British Columbia (“B.C.”). The Company earned its 100% interest through an option agreement and is required to pay advance royalty payments of $100,000 per annum. The royalty payments may offset any net smelter royalty obligations. The optionor retains a 4% net smelter returns ("NSR") royalty which may be acquired by the Company for a cash payment of $2,000,000. During the year ended January 31, 2006, management decided to write off the property to operations. The Hearne Hill claims are currently subject to a legal claim (Note 15).

During the year ended January 31, 1998, the Company signed a letter of agreement with Falconbridge Limited (formerly Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc.) ("Falconbridge") pertaining to an option agreement for the Morrison claims adjacent to the Company’s 100% interest in the Hearne Hill claims in the Omineca District of B.C.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may earn a 50% interest in the Morrison claims by incurring exploration costs of $2,600,000 over a period of five years and delivering a bankable feasibility study. As part of the exploration costs, it was agreed that the Company could charge 15% of eligible exploration costs incurred each year as an overhead fee. To date the Company has complied with the terms of the agreement in regards to exploration costs, and is now in the process of complying with the delivery of a bankable feasibility study.

On April 19, 2004, the Company and Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc, “Noranda" (which was subsequently acquired by Falconbridge ~~amended the original~~Limited, "Falconbridge", which was subsequently acquired by Xstrata LLP, "Xstrata”) signed an agreement whereby ~~Falconbridge~~Noranda agreed to sell its remaining 50% interest to the Company such that the Company would have a 100% interest in the Morrison claims. In order to obtain the remaining 50% interest, the Company agreed to:

on or before June 19, 2004, pay $1,000,000 (paid to ~~Falconbridge (paid)~~Noranda), issue 250,000 common shares (issued to ~~Falconbridge (issued)~~Noranda) and issue 250,000 share purchase warrants ~~to Falconbridge~~ exercisable at $4.05 per share until June 5, 2006 ~~(issued)~~(issued to Noranda);

pay $1,000,000 ~~to Falconbridge~~ on or before October 19, 2005 ~~(paid)~~(paid to Falconbridge);

pay $1,500,000 ~~to Falconbridge~~ on or before April 19, 2007 ~~(accrued)~~(paid to Falconbridge); and

issue ~~to Falconbridge~~ 250,000 common shares on or before commencement of commercial production.

In the event the trading price of the Company’s common shares is below $4.00 per share, the Company is obligated to pay, in cash, the difference between $1,000,000 and the average trading price which is less than $4.00 per share multiplied by 250,000 common shares.

The Company ~~accrued the amounts per items ii) and iii) above as the agreement with Falconbridge stipulates that to ensure that Falconbridge will receive full payment for the mineral claims, the Company has~~ agreed to execute a re-transfer of its 100% interest to Falconbridge if the Company fails to comply with the terms of the agreement. This ~~transfer~~re-transfer is held by a mutually acceptable third ~~party.~~party until the final issue of shares has been made.

The Company has also acquired a 100% interest in certain mineral claims adjacent to the Morrison claims, subject to 1.5% NSR royalty.

On January 7, 2005, the Company signed an agreement to acquire an option for a 100% interest in additional claims in the Omineca District of B.C. As consideration, the Company issued 45,000 common shares at a value of $180,000.

~~JANUARY~~the Hearne Hill claims located in the Omineca District of the Province of British Columbia (“B.C.”). During the year ended January 31, 2006,

management decided not to continue with the Hearne Hill claims and wrote off the property to operations. The Hearne Hill claims are currently subject to a legal claim (Note 13).

The Company holds a 100% interest in certain mineral claims located in the Granisle area of B.C., subject to a 3% NSR royalty. These claims are located near the Morrison claims.

The Company has met its requirements to maintain its recorded interest in the mineral claims with the Province of B.C. until ~~2007~~2016 and there are no other payments required until that year. During the year ended January 31, 2005, management decided not to continue with these claims and therefore, the amounts were written-off to operations.

The Company holds a 100% interest in certain mineral claims located in the Granisle area of B.C., subject to a 3% NSR royalty. These claims are located near the Morrison claims.

The Company held a 100% interest in mineral claims located in the Province of San Juan in Argentina. During the year ended January 31, 2004, management decided not to continue with these claims and therefore the acquisition costs and deferred exploration costs were written-off.

~~Amounts owing to directors~~2008 and ~~former directors consists of services rendered of $35,513 (2005 - $15,953). These amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and have no fixed terms of repayment.~~2007

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, the Company adopted a fixed stock option plan whereby the Company can reserve approximately 20% of its outstanding shares for issuance to officers and directors, employees and consultants. Under the plan, the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock as calculated on the date of grant. These options can be granted for a maximum term of 5 years, and are subject to a vesting provision whereby 12.5% are exercisable on the date of the grant and 12.5% become exercisable every three months thereafter. All options will be vested after twenty one months.

The fair value of stock options granted during the year ended January 31, 2008 was $1,820,701 (2007 – $965,615; 2006 ~~was $492,722 (2005~~ – ~~$851,657; 2004 – $Nil)~~$492,722) which will be recognized as stock-based compensation over their vesting periods.

Total stock-based compensation recognized during the year ended January 31, 2008 was $1,248,170 (2007 – $587,478; 2006 ~~was $417,757 (2005~~ – ~~$212,914; 2004 – $Nil)~~$417,757) which has been recorded in the statements of operations as stock-based compensation with corresponding contributed surplus recorded in shareholders' equity.

The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options granted during the year:

	2006	2005	2004	2008		2007		2006
				Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance, beginning of year	974,716	447,686	458,000

Outstanding, beginning of year				2,212,650	$ 4.69	1,595,980	$ 4.12	974,716	$ 4.16
Issued	748,450	847,530	127,186	-	-	1,470,200	5.01	748,450	4.05
Exercised	-	(2,000)	(2,500)	(926,150)	4.15	(526,500)	4.10	-	-
Expired	(127,186)	(318,500)	(135,000)	-	-	(327,030)	4.31	(127,186)	4.00

Balance, end of year	1,595,980	974,716	447,686
Outstanding, end of year				1,286,500	$ 5.07	2,212,650	$ 4.69	1,595,980	$ 4.12

#The following share purchase warrants were outstanding and exercisable at January 31, 2008:

~~The following share purchase warrants were outstanding and exercisable at January 31, 2006:~~

~~Paid $6,000 (2005 - $48,800; 2004 - $64,000) to a former director~~ for ~~consulting~~project management services which have been capitalized to subcontracts on the Morrison claims ~~and paid $17,200 (2005 - $30,000; 2004 - $14,000) to the same former director~~

~~Paid $78,000 (2005 - $78,000; 2004 - $78,000)~~services in relation to ~~a director for investor relations activities.~~

~~Paid $13,000 (2005 - $42,600; 2004 - $51,200) to a company controlled by a common former director~~ for engineering consulting which was capitalized to subcontracts on the Morrison and Hearne Hill claims and paid $12,800 (2005 - $15,200; 2004 - $Nil) to the same company controlled by a common former director for general consulting services.

~~Paid $3,800 (2005 - $22,050; 2004 - $4,380) to an accounting firm in which a partner was a former director of the Company for professional fees.~~

~~Paid $41,750 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) to a director for~~administrative assistant services which have been capitalized to subcontracts on the Morrison ~~claims~~claims.

for accounting and ~~paid $1,375 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) to the same director for general consulting~~management services.

~~Paid $41,279 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) to a director~~ for ~~investor relations activities.~~

~~Paid $2,400 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) to a director for~~consulting or engineering services which have been capitalized to subcontracts on the Morrison claims ~~and paid $24,156 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) to the same director~~

for general consulting ~~services.~~services in relation to activities not related to exploration

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which represented the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties unless otherwise noted. The amounts owing are non-interest bearing, unsecured and have no fixed terms of repayment.

The significant non-cash transactions for the year ended January 31, 2008 were as follows:

The Company recorded $325,812 of deferred exploration expense as accounts payable and $5,671 of deferred exploration expense as owing to related parties.

The Company recorded $2,418 of amortization expense on property and equipment as deferred exploration costs.

The significant non-cash transactions for the year ended January 31, 2007 were as follows:

The Company completed a private placement of 970,200 units for total proceeds of $3,880,800, of which $280,000 was received prior to January 31, 2006.

The Company recorded $186,063 of deferred exploration expense as accounts payable and $1,935 of deferred exploration expense as owing to related parties.

The Company expended exploration advances of $89,013 to deferred exploration costs.

The Company recorded $3,455 of amortization expense on property and equipment as deferred exploration costs.

The significant non-cash transactions for the year ended January 31, 2006 were as follows:

The Company issued 45,000 common shares, in respect of acquisition costs of mineral property interests, at a value of $180,000.

The Company recorded $100,000 of royalty payments as mineral property interests with a corresponding amount recorded as accounts payable.

The Company recorded $4,006 of amortization expense on property and equipment as deferred exploration costs.

The Company recorded $240,991 of deferred exploration expense as accounts payable and $13,350 of deferred exploration expense as owing to related parties.

The Company expended exploration advances of $192,237 to deferred exploration costs.

~~The significant non-cash transactions for the year ended January 31, 2005 were as follows:~~

~~The Company issued 250,000 common shares, in respect of the Company’s Morrison property agreement, at a value of $1,012,500.~~

~~The Company recorded $2,500,000 of acquisition costs as mineral property interests with a corresponding amount recorded as long term liabilities.~~

~~The Company recorded $100,000 of royalty payments as mineral property interests with a corresponding amount recorded as accounts payable.~~

~~The Company expended exploration advances of $21,000 to deferred exploration costs.~~

~~The Company recorded $2,971 of amortization expense on property and equipment as deferred exploration costs.~~

~~The significant non-cash transactions for the year ended January 31, 2004 were as follows:~~

~~The Company issued 44,444 common shares to settle $200,000 of royalty payments from prior years included in accounts payable.~~

~~The Company recorded $100,000 of royalty payments as mineral property interests with a corresponding amount recorded as accounts payable.~~

~~The Company expended exploration advances of $3,917 to deferred exploration costs.~~

~~The Company recorded $4,245 of amortization expense on property and equipment as deferred exploration costs.~~

~~As at January 31, 2006, cash and cash equivalents is represented by cash on hand in the amount of $384,746 (2005 - $443,754; 2004 - $20,428).~~#

A reconciliation of income tax recovery at statutory rates (2008:34.1%; 2007:34.1%; 2006:38.6%) with the reported income tax recovery is as follows:

	2006	2005	2004	2008	2007	2006

Loss for the year	$ (8,883,273)	$ (902,759)	$ (327,241)	$ (2,221,907)	$ (1,365,664)	$ (8,883,273)

Expected income tax (recovery)	$ (3,426,989)	$ (321,382)	$ (116,498)	$ (757,670)	$ (465,691)	$ (3,426,989)
Amortization	3,379	1,377	1,568
Non-deductible items	3,246,033	160,782	3,822	425,626	183,280	3,246,033
Unrecognized benefit of non-capital losses and temporary differences	177,577	159,223	111,108	332,044	282,411	180,956


Total income tax recovery	$ -			$ -

The significant components of the Company's future income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

~~During the year ended January 31, 2005, the Company issued 6,030 common shares on a flow-through basis for gross proceeds of $25,024 which was renounced during the year ended January 31, 2006.~~

The Company has non-capital losses of approximately ~~$2,000,000~~$3,827,000 available for deduction against future taxable income. These losses, if not utilized will expire in years up to ~~2016.~~2028 (see table following). Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these non-capital losses and other tax assets have not been recognized in these financial statements and have been offset by a valuation allowance.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, exploration advances, reclamation deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, amounts owing to related parties and long term liabilities. It is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values, unless otherwise noted.

~~The Company has its cash in primarily one commercial bank with a high credit standing in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.~~

~~The Company’s receivables are amounts due from the Canada Revenue Agency and from the Province of British Columbia.~~

The Company is required from time to time to advance funds to independent contractors who perform exploration services on the mineral property interests. These independent contractors require the Company to advance the funds as protection against any possible losses that could occur if the Company did not meet its obligations. As the contractors perform exploration work, the exploration advances are deducted from any amounts owed to the contractor and the exploration advances are reduced accordingly with a corresponding charge to deferred exploration costs.

~~The Company’s reclamation deposit is secured as a term deposit with its primary bank and interest is paid on an annual basis to the Company.~~

The Company has entered into an operating lease agreement for office premises. The annual lease commitment under the lease is as follows:

#The Company has entered into an operating lease agreement for a vehicle. The annual lease commitment under the lease is as follows:

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operation decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. All of the Company’s operations are within the mining sector. The Company’s mining operations are centralized whereby the Company’s head office is responsible for the exploration results and to provide support in addressing local and regional issues. As at January 31, ~~2006~~2008 and ~~2005,~~2007, the Company’s ~~current mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs~~assets are all located in Canada (Notes 34 and 4)6).

~~Subsequent to~~During the fiscal year ~~end,~~ended January 31, 2007, an optionor of the Hearne Hill property (Note 3)4) which adjoins the Company’s Morrison property ~~has~~had filed a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against the Company in respect to the option agreement on the Hearne Hill property, which it alleges is of no further force and effect and seeks the return of the Hearne Hill property and the area of interest around the Hearne Hill claims. The ~~amount~~Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim also includes a claim for the return of the ~~claim~~Morrison property. The Company is of the view that the optionor has ~~not been identified.~~no right whatsoever to the Morrison property. Management of the Company is vigorously defending the action and has ~~indicated~~filed a Statement of Defense and a Counterclaim against the optionor for damages in the amount of $55,356 for breach of a contract. The Company had accrued a total of $200,000 as payable in regards to th e Hearne Hill. During the current fiscal year, the Company was advised that ~~it intends~~the application by the optionors of the Hearne Hill property to ~~defend~~include the ~~legal action.~~company’s Morrison property as part of their claim has been dismissed by the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The ultimate liability, if any, arising from this claim is not presently determinable and will be recorded at the time of that determination.

Subsequent to year end, the Company ~~completed a non-brokered~~issued 796,700 common shares on exercise of warrants for total proceeds of $3,585,150 and issued 1,250 common shares on exercise of options for total proceeds of $6,562. The Company has not issued any other stock or announced any private placement of 970,200 units at $4.00 per unit. Each unit is comprised of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each share purchase warrant will entitle the holder to purchase an additional common share at a price of $4.50 per share on or before April 11, 2008. At January 31, 2006, the Company had received share subscriptions of $280,000 related to this non-brokered private placement.placements.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Material variations in the accounting principles, practices and methods used in preparing these financial statements from principles, practices and methods accepted in the United States (“United States GAAP”) are described and quantified below.

The impact of the differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP on the balance sheets would be as follows:

	2006			2005			2008			2007
	Balance, Canadian GAAP	Adjustments	Balance, United States GAAP	Balance, Canadian GAAP	Adjustments	Balance, United States GAAP	Balance, Canadian GAAP	Adjustments	Balance, United States GAAP	Balance, Canadian GAAP	Adjustments	Balance, United States GAAP

Current assets	$ 532,314	$ -	$ 532,314	$ 782,028	$ -	$ 782,028	$5,675,798	$ -	$ 5,675,798	$ 4,230,891	$ -	$ 4,230,891
Mineral property interests	4,832,500	(4,652,500)	180,000	5,698,500	(5,698,500)	-	4,832,500	(140,000)	4,692,500	4,832,500	(140,000)	4,692,500
Deferred exploration costs	7,137,683	(7,137,683)	-	12,373,828	(12,373,828)	-	12,792,612	(12,792,612)	-	9,445,857	(9,445,857)	-
Property and equipment	54,564	-	54,564	18,223	-	18,223	35,793	-	35,793	49,643	-	49,643
Reclamation deposits	118,600	-	118,600	72,500	-	72,500	118,600	-	118,600	118,600	-	118,600

	$ 12,675,661	$ (11,790,183)	$ 885,478	$ 18,945,079	$ (18,072,328)	$ 872,751	$23,455,303	$ (12,932,612)	$ 10,522,691	$ 18,677,491	$ (9,585,857)	$ 9,091,634

Current liabilities	$ 521,075	$ -	$ 521,075	$ 1,238,202	$ -	$ 1,238,202	$ 617,627	$ -	$ 617,627	$ 482,866	$ -	$ 482,866
Long term liabilities	1,500,000	-	1,500,000	1,500,000	-	1,500,000
Shareholders' equity	10,654,586	(11,790,183)	(1,135,597)	16,206,877	(18,072,328)	(1,865,451)	22,837,676	(12,932,612)	9,905,064	18,194,625	(9,585,857)	8,608,768

	$ 12,675,661	$ (11,790,183)	$ 885,478	$ 18,945,079	$ (18,072,328)	$ 872,751	$23,455,303	$ (12,932,612)	$ 10,522,691	$ 18,677,491	$ (9,585,857)	$ 9,091,634

The impact of the differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP on the statements of operations would be as follows:

	2006	2005 Restated	2004	2008	2007	2006

Loss for the year, Canadian GAAP	$ (8,883,273)	$ (902,759)	$ (327,241)	$ (2,221,907)	$ (1,365,664)	$ (8,883,273)
Adjustments:
Write-off of mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs	7,851,288	250,000	10,735
Write-off of mineral property interests				-		1,146,000
Write-off of deferred exploration costs				-		6,705,288
Mineral property interests	(100,000)	(4,612,500)	(100,000)	-		(100,000)
Deferred exploration costs	(1,469,143)	(784,093)	(904,720)	(3,346,755)	(2,308,174)	(1,469,143)
Contributed executive services	(39,000)	(38,500)	(39,000)	-	-	(39,000)

Loss for the year, United States GAAP	$ (2,640,128)	$ (6,087,852)	$ (1,360,226)	$ (5,568,662)	$ (3,673,838)	$ (2,640,128)

Basic and diluted loss per common share, United States GAAP	$ (0.42)	$ (1.07)	$ (0.27)	$ (0.59)	$ (0.45)	$ (0.42)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, United States GAAP	6,320,955	5,714,090	5,087,736	9,496,503	8,142,907	6,320,955

The impact of the differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP on the statements of cash flows would be as follows:

	2006	2005	2004	2008	2007	2006
				��
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,
Net cash used in operating activities,
Canadian GAAP	$ (622,218)	$ (498,314)	$ 40,164	$ (872,140)	$ (992,627)	$ (622,218)
Amortization	4,006	2,971	4,245	2,418	3,455	4,006
Mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs (net of recovery)	(1,271,052)	(1,784,093)	(904,720)	(3,203,270)	(2,374,517)	(1,271,052)
Exploration advances	192,237	46,000	2,000	-	89,013	192,237

Net cash used in operating activities, Unites States GAAP	(1,697,027)	(2,233,436)	(858,311)	(4,072,992)	(3,274,676)	(1,697,027)

Net cash provided by financing activities, Canadian GAAP
and Unites States GAAP	1,733,225	2,656,762	828,411	5,616,788	6,868,225	1,733,225

The Company has restated its reported results under United States GAAP for fiscal 2005 to properly account for the reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP. Previously, the Company had not adjusted back the $250,000 of mineral property interest costs written off for Canadian GAAP purposes that for United States GAAP purposes had already been written off in prior fiscal years.

The effect of the restatement for United States GAAP purposes was a reduction in loss for the year ended January 31, 2005 of $250,000. In addition, such restatement reduced loss per common share for fiscal 2005 on a basic and fully diluted basis by $0.04. The restatement under United States GAAP had no effect on the Company’s primary financial statements and related notes prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP (other than Note 17).

Under Canadian GAAP, mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs, including acquisition and exploration costs, are carried at cost and written down if the properties are abandoned, sold or if management determines there to be an impairment in value. Under United States GAAP, ~~mineral property interests and~~ deferred exploration costs are expensed as incurred. The Company also considers the provisions of EITF 04-02 “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets” which concluded that mineral rights are tangible assets. Accordingly, the Company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition of mineral rights. Once a final feasibility study has been completed, additional costs incurred to bring the mine into production are capitalized as development costs. Costs incurred to access ore bodies identified in the current mining plan after production has commenced are considered production ~~costs~~cos ts and are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred to extend production beyond those areas identified in the mining plan where additional reserves have been established are deferred as development costs until the incremental reserves are produced. Capitalized costs are amortized ~~usin g~~using the unit-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves.

Effective for reporting periods beginning after April 29, 2004, the Company has adopted the provisions of EITF 04-02 “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets” which concluded that mineral rights are tangible assets. Accordingly, effective for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the Company capitalizes costs related to the acquisition of mineral rights.

Under Canadian GAAP, flow-through shares are accounted for as part of the issuance of capital stock at the price paid for the shares, net of any future income tax liability. Under United States GAAP, any difference between the market price of the Company's stock and the fair value of the flow-through shares must be recorded as a liability, if a premium is paid by investors, or as an asset if investors are purchasing the shares at a discount. The asset or liability is charged to income as the flow-through share proceeds are expended on qualifying expenditures.

During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company issued flow-through shares for total proceeds of $Nil (2005 - $25,024; 2004 - $Nil). As the market price of the Company’s stock was not significantly different from the fair value of the flow-through shares issued during fiscal 2005, no asset or liability was recorded.

Under United States GAAP, ~~Statements of Financial Accounting Standards~~effective February 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 ~~“Accounting for Stock-based Compensation”~~(revised), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS ~~123”~~123(R)”) ~~requires companies to establish a fair market value based method~~utilizing the modified prospective approach. The impact of ~~accounting for stock-based compensation plans. Effective February 1, 2003,~~adoption of the standard did not materially affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows because the Company ~~elected to follow~~adopted the fair value method of accounting for ~~stock-based compensation.~~stock options prescribed by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” on February 1, 2003. The Company’s results for the year ended January 31, 2007 were not significantly affected as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on February 1, 2006.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method as disclosed in Note 2. Accordingly, there is no difference between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP in the accounting for stock-based compensation for the years ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005~~2008, 2007 and ~~2004.~~2006.

Pursuant to SAB Topic 1:B(1) and the last paragraph of SAB 5:T, the Company is required to report all costs of conducting its business. Accordingly, for fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, the Company has recorded the fair value of contributed executive services provided to the Company at no cost as compensation expense, with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus, in the amount of ~~$39,000, $38,500, and $39,000~~$39,000. Effective for the fiscal years ended January 31, ~~2006, 2005~~2008 and ~~2004, respectively.~~2007, the Company is compensating directors for attendance at meetings and therefore no adjustment for fair value of contributed executive services is required.

~~New accounting pronouncements~~Amortization of property equipment, vehicles and furniture

In December 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29” (“SFAS 153”) which amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, “AccountingUnder Canadian GAAP, the Company capitalizes the depreciation on fixed assets purchased for Nonmonetary Transactions” to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flowsexploration work as part of the ~~entity~~deferred exploration expenditures. As this is a non-cash item, it is excluded from the cash flow in regards to the Investing activities. Under United States GAAP, deferred exploration costs are ~~expected to change significantly~~expensed as ~~a result of~~incurred and therefore, the ~~exchange. SFAS 153~~amortization on the property equipment, vehicles and furniture is ~~effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.~~shown as an operating activity, not an investing activity.

In December 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R supersedes APB 25 and its related implementation guidance by requiring entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions) and revises SFAS 123 as follows:

Public entities are required to measure liabilities incurred to employees in share-based payment transactions at fair value and nonpublic entities may elect to measure their liabilities to employees incurred in share-based payment transactions at their intrinsic value whereas under SFAS 123, all share-based payment liabilities were measured at their intrinsic value.

Nonpublic entities are required to calculate fair value using an appropriate industry sector index for the expected volatility of its share price if it is not practicable to estimate the expected volatility of the entity’s share price.

~~Entities are required to estimate the number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered as opposed to accounting for forfeitures as they occur.~~

Incremental compensation cost for a modification of the terms or conditions of an award is measured by comparing the fair value of the modified award with the fair value of the award immediately before the modification whereas SFAS 123 required that the effects of a modification be measured as the difference between the fair value of the modified award at the date it is granted and the award’s value immediately before the modification determined based on the shorter of (1) its remaining initially estimated expected life or (2) the expected life of the modified award.

SFAS 123R also clarifies and expands guidance in several areas, including measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability and attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. SFAS 123R does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS 123 as originally issued and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18 “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services” (“EITF 96-18”). SFAS 123R also does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans which are subject to Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”. Public entities (other than those filing as small business issuers) will be required to apply SFAS 123R as of the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. Public entities that file as small business issuers will be required to apply SFAS 123R in the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. For nonpublic entities, SFAS 123R must be applied as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005.

In May 2005, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (“SFAS 154”), which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. SFAS 154 requires that changes in accounting policy be accounted for on a retroactive basis.

~~The adoption of these new pronouncements are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.~~

In January 2005, the CICA issued the following new accounting standards, ~~effective~~for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, ~~2006~~2006:

CICA Handbook Section 1530: “Comprehensive Income” establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income, defined as a change in value of net assets that is not due to owner activities, by introducing a new requirement to temporarily present certain gains and losses outside of net income. The adoption of this new standard by the Company is not expected to have a material impact.

CICA Handbook Section 3251: “Equity” establishes standards for the presentation of equity and changes in equity during the reporting period. The adoption of this new standard by the Company is not expected to have a material impact.

CICA Handbook Section 3855: “Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement” establishes standards for the recognition, classification and measurement of financial instruments including the presentation of any resulting gains and losses. Assets classified as available-for-sale securities will have revaluation gains and losses included in other comprehensive income until these assets are no longer included on the balance sheet. The adoption of this new standard by the Company is not expected to have a material impact.

The following accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2007:

CICA Handbook Section 1506: “Accounting Changes” states that an entity shall change an accounting policy only if the change is required by a primary source of GAAP or results in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information about the effects of transactions, other events or conditions on the entity's financial position, financial performance or cash flows. The adoption of this new standard by the Company is not expected to have a material impact.

In June 2007, the CICA approved amendments to Handbook Section 1400 “General Standards for Financial Statement Presentation”. The standard outlines specific requirements for assessing and disclosing an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Although the revised standard is not expected to impact the Company’s net earnings or financial position, there may be different and additional disclosure surrounding the Company’s going concern disclosure.

In December 2006, the CICA approved Handbook sections 3862 “Financial Instruments Disclosure” and section 3863 “Financial Instruments Presentation”. These sections will require a complete set of disclosure and presentation requirements for financial instruments with increased emphasis on making disclosure more transparent and enhancing risk identification and discussion of how risks are managed. Although the revised standard will not impact the Company’s net earnings or financial position, there may be additional disclosure provided.

In January 2006, the CICA Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) adopted a strategic plan for the direction of accounting standards in Canada and the expected convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) by the end of 2011. On February 13, 2008 the Canadian Accounting Standards Board confirmed 2011 as the official changeover date for publicly listed Canadian companies to start using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The transition will affect interim and annual financial statements relating to years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The impact of the transition to IFRS on the Company's consolidated financial statements has not yet been determined.

In December 2006, the CICA approved Handbook section 1535 “Capital Disclosures” with outlines new required disclosure of specific information about an entity’s objective, policies and processes for managing capital. Although the revised standard will not impact the Company’s net earnings or financial position, there will be additional disclosure provided.

In July 2006, FASB issued Financial Instrument No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"), which is a change in accounting for income taxes. FIN 48 specifies how tax benefits for uncertain tax positions are to he recognized, measured, and derecognized in financial statements; requires certain disclosures of uncertain tax matters; specifies how reserves for uncertain tax positions should be classified on the balance sheet; and provides transition and interim period guidance, among other provisions. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

FSP FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48”, amends Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) interpretation No.48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax, to provide guidance on how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption, with the cumulative effect adjustment reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The FSP is to be adopted upon initial adoption of FIN 48 with retroactive treatment if required.

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157 ("SFAS 157”), "Fair Value Measurements." Among other requirements, SFAS 157 defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value and also expands disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, (“FAS 159”) which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity is required to report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.

This statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement. FAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is applicable beginning in the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will have on its consolidate

The adoption of these new pronouncements are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	~~Part~~PART I	Page

Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors	8
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable	8
Item 3.	Key Information	8
Item 4.	Information on the Company	1615
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects	31
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees	38
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions	44
Item 8.	Financial Information	45
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing	45
Item 10.	Additional Information	50
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	6364
Item 12.	Description of Other Securities Other Than Equity Securities	64

	PART II


Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies	64
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds	64
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures	64
Item 16.	Reserved	65
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	65
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics	65
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	65
Item 16D.	Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees	6566
Item 16E.	Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	6566

	~~Part~~PART III

Item 17.	Financial Statements	6566
Item 18.	Financial Statements	66
Item 19.	Exhibits	66

To Convert from Metric	To Imperial	Multiply by

Hectares	Acres	2.471
Meters	Feet (ft.)	3.281
Kilometers (km)	Miles	0.621
Tonnes	Tons (2000 pounds)	1.102
Grams/tonne	Ounces (troy/ton)	0.029

	Average	High	Low	Close

Year Ended 12/31/05	$1.21	$1.27	$1.14	$1.16
Year Ended 12/31/04	$1.28	$1.40	$1.19	$1.20
Year Ended 12/31/03	$1.39	$1.58	$1.29	$1.29
Year Ended 12/31/02	$1.57	$1.61	$1.51	$1.52
Year Ended 12/31/01	$1.55	$1.60	$1.49	$1.59
Year Ended 12/31/00	$1.48	$1.56	$1.44	$1.50

Three Months Ended 6/30/06		$1.17	$1.10	$1.12
Three Months Ended 3/31/06		$1.17	$1.13	$1.17
Three Months Ended 12/31/05		$1.20	$1.15	$1.17
Three Months Ended 9/30/05		$1.22	$1.15	$1.18

Three Months Ended 6/30/05		$1.27	$1.22	$1.23
Three Months Ended 3/31/05		$1.26	$1.20	$1.21
Three Months Ended 12/31/04		$1.27	$1.18	$1.20
Three Months Ended 9/30/04		$1.34	$1.26	$1.26

Three Months Ended 6/30/04		$1.27	$1.21	$1.23
Three Months Ended 3/31/04		$1.26	$1.20	$1.21
Three Months Ended 12/31/04		$1.24	$1.19	$1.20
Three Months Ended 9/30/04		$1.34	$1.26	$1.26

June 2006		$1.12	$1.10	$1.12
May 2006		$1.12	$1.10	$1.10
April 2006		$1.17	$1.12	$1.12
March 2006		$1.17	$1.13	$1.17
February 2006		$1.16	$1.14	$1.14
January 2006		$1.17	$1.14	$1.14

	Average	High	Low	Close

Year Ended 12/31/07	$1.02	$1.16	$0.95	$0.99
Year Ended 12/31/06	$1.13	$1.17	$1.10	$1.17
Year Ended 12/31/05	$1.21	$1.27	$1.14	$1.16
Year Ended 12/31/04	$1.28	$1.40	$1.19	$1.20
Year Ended 12/31/03	$1.39	$1.58	$1.29	$1.29

Three Months Ended 6/30/08		$1.03	$0.98	$1.02
Three Months Ended 3/31/08		$1.03	$0.97	$1.03
Three Months Ended 12/31/07		$1.02	$0.92	$0.99
Three Months Ended 9/30/07		$1.08	$1.00	$1.00

Three Months Ended 6/30/07		$1.16	$1.06	$1.06
Three Months Ended 3/31/07		$1.19	$1.15	$1.15
Three Months Ended 12/31/06		$1.17	$1.12	$1.17
Three Months Ended 9/30/06		$1.14	$1.11	$1.12

Three Months Ended 6/30/06		$1.17	$1.10	$1.12
Three Months Ended 3/31/06		$1.17	$1.13	$1.17
Three Months Ended 12/31/05		$1.20	$1.15	$1.17
Three Months Ended 9/30/05		$1.22	$1.15	$1.18

June 2008		$1.03	$1.01	$1.02
May 2008		$1.03	$0.98	$0.99
April 2008		$1.03	$1.00	$1.01
March 2008		$1.03	$0.98	$1.03
February 2008		$1.02	$0.97	$0.98
January 2008		$1.03	$0.99	$0.99

~~August 2006 to January 31, 2007~~	~~$29,982~~
February 1, 2007 to January 31, 2008	$~~59,963~~61,300
February 1, 2008 to January 31, 2009	$~~61,438~~63,797
February 1, 2009 to ~~July 31,~~April 30, 2009	$~~15,482~~16,072

Name	Position	Business Address
William Deeks	Chairman and Director	2773 Coyote Place, Millers Pond Whistler, B.C. V0N 1B2

Gregory R. Anderson	President, CEO and Director	7608 East Cliff ~~Road,~~Rose Trail, Gold Canyon, AZ 85218

Ruth Swan	Chief Financial Officer	#1702 – 1166 Alberni Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3Z3

John Joseph Plourde	Director	#1702 – 1166 Alberni Street Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3Z3

Erik Tornquist	Director	#1702 – 116 Alberni Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3Z3

Mark Gulbrandson	Director	P.O. Box 240299 Apple Valley, MN 55124

Dennis Simmons	Director	8977 Hunters Way Apple Valley, MN 55124

William Webster	Director	8 Relmar Road Toronto, ON M5P 2Y5

Cash Amount	Due Date of Payment

$1,000,000	Within 60 days of signing the Agreement (Paid)
$1,000,000	18 months from the date of the signing of the Agreement (Paid)
$1,500,000	36 months from the date of the signing of the Agreement (Paid)

		Average Grade				Contained Metal
Class	Tonnes	Cu EQ (%)	Cu (%)	Au (g./t)	Mo (%)	Cu (lb) 000,000’s	Au (oz) 000’s	Mo (lb) 000’s

Measured	96,516	0.47	0.40	0.20	0.004	851.13	614.4	8,511
Indicated	110,353	0.46	0.39	0.20	0.005	936.66	691.8	12,164

Total Measured/ Indicated	206,869	0.46	0.39	0.20	0.005	1,787.78	1,306.3	20,676

		Payments due by period

	Total		less than 1 year	1 – 3 years	3 – 5 Years	more than 5 years

Long-Term Debt Obligations	None		None	None	None	None
Capital Lease Obligations	None		None	None	None	None
Operating Lease Obligations	$194,880		$57,997	$136,883	None	None
Purchase Obligations	$1,500,000		None	$1,500,000	None	None
Other Long-Term Liabilities	None		None	None	None	None

Name	Age	Date First Elected/Appointed
Gregory Anderson	5052	June 24, 2005
William Deeks	7173	March 17, 1997
Mark Gulbrandson	5355	June 24, 2005
John J. Plourde	6163	December 30, 1999
Dr. Dennis Simmons	56	November 29, 2006
Erik Tornquist	4860	June 24, 2005
William F. Webster	6264	June 24, 2005

Name	Position	Age	Date of Appointment
Gregory Anderson	President and CEO	5052	June 24, 2005
Ruth Swan	Chief Financial Officer	4951	April 20, 2006

Name	Fiscal Year	Salary	Options Granted	Other Compensation
Gregory Anderson CEO, President and Director	2006 2005	None None	None 200,000	$41,279 (1) None

William Deeks Chairman and Director	2006 2005 2004	None None None	50,000 50,000 None	None None None

Michael Mews Former Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary	2006 2005	None None	38,000 10,000	$26,556 (2) None

John Plourde, Director	2006 2005 2004	None None None	None 105,000 None	$78,000 (3) $78,000 $78,000

Mark Gulbrandson, Director	2006	None	100,000	None

Erik Tornquist, Director	2006	None	100,000	$43,125 (4)

William Webster, Director	2006	None	100,000	None

Chris Sampson, Former President	2006 2005 2004	None None None	None 76,000 None	$25,800 (5) $57,800 $51,200

J. Paul Stevenson, Former Chief Executive	2006 2005 2004	None None None	None 125,000 None	$23,200 (6) $78,800 $78,000

Perry Munton Former CFO	2006 2005 2004	None None None	None 75,000 None	$ 3,800 (7) $22,050 $ 4,380

Shelley Hallock, Former Director	2005 2004	None None	50,000 None	None None

Barbara Hilton, Former Director	2005 2004	None None	50,000 None	None None

Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class

Common	Gregory Anderson (1)	301,975	3.60%
Common	Ruth Swan (2)	41,708	0.51%
Common	William Deeks (3)	159,750	1.92%
Common	Mark Gulbrandson (4)	432,778	5.22%
Common	John Plourde (5)	432,207	5.13%
Common	Erik Tornquist (6)	161,395	1.95%
Common	William Webster (7)	256,100	3.09%

	Total Directors/Officers	1,785,913	19.62%

Title of Class	Name of Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class

Common	John Plourde (1)	432,207	5.13%
Common	Mark Gulbrandson (2)	432,778	5.22%

	- Sales -
	Canadian Dollars
Period	High	Low	Close

June 2008	$8.75	$6.00	$7.45
May 2008	$8.88	$7.16	$7.85
April 2008	$9.60	$8.25	$8.75
March 2008	$10.15	$9.00	$9.88
February 2008	$11.10	$9.85	$10.15
January 2008	$11.45	$9.50	$10.70

Three Months Ended 4/30/08	$11.10	$8.25	$8.75
Three Months Ended 1/31/08	$12.09	$9.50	$10.70
Three Months Ended 10/31/07	$13.00	$9.75	$11.50
Three Months Ended 7/31/07	$12.21	$9.10	$11.15

Three Months Ended 4/30/07	$12.30	$7.40	$12.10
Three Months Ended 1/31/07	$8.50	$7.05	$8.10
Three Months Ended 10/31/06	$8.80	$6.00	$7.40
Three Months Ended 7/31/06	$8.72	$4.80	$6.90

Three Months Ended 4/30/06	$8.11	$3.95	$8.11
Three Months Ended 1/31/06	$4.75	$3.68	$4.40
Three Months Ended 10/31/05	$4.10	$3.40	$4.00
Three Months Ended 7/31/05	$4.00	$3.20	$3.50

Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/08	$13.00	$7.40	$10.70
Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/07	$8.80	$3.95	$8.10
Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/06	$4.75	$3.20	$4.40
Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/05	$5.00	$3.55	$3.86
Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/04	$4.50	$2.70	$4.50

~~Vancouver, Canada~~	~~Chartered Accountants~~

~~April 12, 2006~~

~~Vancouver, Canada~~	~~Chartered Accountants~~

~~April 12, 2006~~

	“William Deeks”			“Gregory R. Anderson”
	William Deeks, Chairman			Gregory R. Anderson, CEO

	~~“Gregory R. Anderson”~~		~~“Ruth Swan”~~
	~~Gregory R. Anderson, CEO~~		~~Ruth Swan, CFO~~

	- Sales -
	United States Dollars
Period	High	Low	Close

June 2008	$8.87	$5.40	$7.35
May 2008	$9.20	$7.40	$7.90
April 2008	$9.20	$7.40	$8.60
March 2008	$10.40	$8.00	$9.50
February 2008	$11.00	$10.00	$10.30
January 2008	$11.31	$9.52	$10.75

Three Months Ended 4/30/08	$11.00	$7.40	$8.60
Three Months Ended 1/31/08	$12.60	$9.52	$10.75
Three Months Ended 10/31/07	$12.70	$9.80	$12.00

Fiscal Year Ended 1/31/08	$12.70	$9.52	$10.75

Number of Share PurchaseWarrants Outstanding	Exercise Price/share	Expiration Date
82,500	$4.25	October 12, 2006
41,030	$4.15	January 7, 2007
228,000	$4.15	March 11, 2007
520,450	$4.00	December 2, 2007
970,200	$4.50	April 11, 2008

1,842,180 Warrants Outstanding

Name	Total Number of ~~Shares~~Options Held	Total Number of ~~Common~~Options ~~Stock~~Vested or Vesting Within 60 Days	CDN$ Exercise Price	Expiration Date

Gregory Anderson, President, CEO and Director	~~125,000~~75,000 35,000 54,300 22,500	75,000 35,000 33,937 14,062	~~$5.00~~ $3.87 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	~~July 2, 2007~~ October 13, 2009 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer	10,000 10,000 50,000 10,000 1,827	10,000 10,000 50,000 6,250 1,141	$3.87 $4.00 $6.20 $11.00 $11.55	October 13, 2009 October 4, 2010 April 20, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

John Plourde, Director	~~135,000~~105,000 35,000 54,300 22,500	105,000 35,000 33,937 14,062	~~$5.00~~ $3.87 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	~~July 2, 2007~~ October 13, 2009 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

William Deeks, Director	50,000 50,000 22,000 34,300 15,600	50,000 50,000 22,000 21,437 9,750	$3.87 $4.00 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	October 13, 2009 October 4, 2010 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

Mark Gulbrandson, Director	100,000 22,000 34,200 15,700	100,000 22,000 21,375 9,812	$4.00 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	October 4, 2010 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

Dennis Simmons, Director	100,000 34,300 15,600	87,500 21,437 9,750	$7.00 $11.00 $11.55	November 29, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

Erik Tornquist, Director	100,000 35,000 54,300 22,500	100,000 35,000 33,937 14,062	$4.00 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	October 4, 2010 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

William Webster, Director	100,000 22,000 34,300 15,600	100,000 22,000 21,437 9,750	$4.00 $5.25 $11.00 $11.55	October 4, 2010 June 27, 2011 July 3, 2012 July 30, 2012

Total Officers and Directors (78 persons)	~~1,081,000~~1,362,827
Total Employees and Consultants (7 (5 persons)	~~336,000~~200,000
Total Officers/Directors/Employees And Consultants	~~1,417,000~~1,562,827

	Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2006	Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2005

Audit Fees	$ 34,500	$ 20,000
Audit Related Fees	13,200	22,500
Tax Fees	0	0
All Other Fees	803	320

		Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2007

Audit Fees	$ 35,000	$ 39,500
Audit Related Fees	Nil	17,300
Tax Fees	Nil	Nil
All Other Fees	752	784
Total	$ 35,752	$ 57,584


1. Certificate of Incorporation, Certificates of Name Change, Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Amalgamation and By-Laws

2. Instruments defining the rights of holders of the securities being registered *See Exhibit Number 1*
3. Voting Trust Agreements – N/A
4. Material Contracts (All previously filed) 1. Option Agreement for Hearne Hill and Morrison between Booker Gold (now Pacific Booker Minerals) and Noranda Mining and Exploration (Now Falconbridge Ltd.) dated October 22, 1997. 2. Agreement between the Company and Lorne Spence dated December 5, 1992. 3. Agreement between the Company and KCC 167 Holdings Ltd. dated July 4, 1995. 4. Agreement between the Company and Windbourne International Capital Management Ltd. dated June 15, 1995. 5. Agreement between the Company and John Paul Stevenson dated November 23, 1998. 6. Agreement between the Company, Lorne Spence, Jacquie Bland and David Chapman dated January 28, 1999. 7. Agreement between the Company and Rolland Joseph Menard dated July 9, 2001. 8. Agreement between the Company and Noranda Inc. (Now Falconbridge Ltd.) dated April 19, 2004.
5. List of Foreign Patents – N/A
6. Calculation of earnings per share – N/A
7. Explanation of calculation of ratios – N/A
8. List of Subsidiaries – N/A
9. Statement pursuant to the instructions to Item 8.A.4, regarding the financial statements filed in registration statements for initial public offerings of securities – N/A
10.Other documents Copy of Stock Option Plan dated June 16, 2008 ~~Copy~~Certifications of the ~~Code~~Chief Executive Officer Certification of ~~Ethics and Business Conduct~~the Chief Financial Officer

	2006	2005

*Continued…*



LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY


Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$ 485,562	$ 222,249
Amounts owing to related parties (Note 6)	35,513	15,953
Current portion of long term liabilities	-	1,000,000

Total current liabilities	521,075	1,238,202

Long term liabilities(Note 7)	1,500,000	1,500,000

Total liabilities	2,021,075	2,738,202

Shareholders' equity
Capital stock (Note 8)
Authorized:
100,000,000 common shares without par value
Issued and outstanding
6,802,239 common shares (2005 – 6,008,789)	23,482,104	20,274,104
Share subscriptions received in advance (Note 16)	280,000	574,775
Contributed surplus (Note 8)	630,671	212,914
Deficit	(13,738,189)	(4,854,916)

Total shareholders’ equity	10,654,586	16,206,877

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$ 12,675,661	$ 18,945,079


	Number of Shares	Price	Amount	Share Subscriptions Received In Advance	Contributed Surplus	Deficit	Total



Balance, January 31, 2003	4,970,129		$ 16,148,185	$ -	$ -	$ (3,624,916)	$ 12,523,269
Private placement	127,186	$ 4.00	508,744	-	-	-	508,744
Exercise of warrants	2,500	4.00	10,000	-	-	-	10,000
Settlement of accounts payable	44,444	4.50	200,000	-	-	-	200,000
Share subscriptions received	-		-	275,400	-	-	275,400
Loss for the year	-		-	-	-	(327,241)	(327,241)


Balance, January 31, 2004	5,144,259		16,866,929	275,400	-	(3,952,157)	13,190,172
Private placements	597,530	3.94	2,356,675	(275,400)	-	-	2,081,275
Exercise of stock options	15,000	2.00	30,000	-	-	-	30,000
Exercise of warrants	2,000	4.00	8,000	-	-	-	8,000
Mineral property interests	250,000	4.05	1,012,500	-	-	-	1,012,500
Share subscriptions received	-		-	574,775	-	-	574,775
Stock-based compensation	-		-	-	212,914	-	212,914
Loss for the year	-		-	-	-	(902,759)	(902,759)

Balance, January 31, 2005	6,008,789		20,274,104	574,775	212,914	(4,854,916)	16,206,877
Private placements	748,450	4.05	3,028,000	(574,775)	-	-	2,453,225
Mineral property interests	45,000	4.00	180,000	-	-	-	180,000
Share subscriptions received	-		-	280,000	-	-	280,000
Stock-based compensation	-		-	-	417,757	-	417,757
Loss for the year	-		-	-	-	(8,883,273)	(8,883,273)

Balance, January 31, 2006	6,802,239		$ 23,482,104	$ 280,000	$ 630,671	$ (13,738,189)	$ 10,654,586

	2006	2005

Working capital (deficiency)	$ 11,239	$ (456,174)
Deficit	(13,738,189)	(4,854,916)

	Automobile	30% declining balance
	Computer equipment	30% to 45% declining balance
	Office furniture and equipment	20% declining balance
	Trailers	30% declining balance

2006	Hearne Hill claims, Canada	Morrison claims, Canada	Copper claims, Canada	CUB claims, Canada	Total

Balance, beginning of year	$ 1,046,000	$ 4,652,500	$ -	$ -	$ 5,698,500

Additions
Payments	100,000	-	-	-	100,000
Capital stock issued	-	180,000	-	-	180,000

	100,000	180,000	-	-	280,000

Write-offs	(1,146,000)	-	-	-	(1,146,000)

Balance, end of year	$ -	$ 4,832,500	$ -	$ -	$ 4,832,500

Morrison claims, Canada	2008	2007

Balance, beginning and end of year	$ 4,832,500	$ 4,832,500

	Cost	Accumulated Amortization	Net Book Value

January 31, 2008
Trailers	$ 25,000	$ 24,706	$ 294
Automobile	12,840	7,492	5,348
Office furniture and equipment	50,528	37,406	13,122
Computer equipment	62,074	45,045	17,029

	$ 150,442	$ 114,649	$ 35,793

	2006	2005

Due to Falconbridge (Note 3), non-interest bearing, secured by title to related mineral property interest and payable in the following installments: $1,000,000 by October 19, 2005 and $1,500,000 by April 19, 2007.	$ 1,500,000	$ 2,500,000

Current portion of long term liabilities	-	(1,000,000)

Long term liabilities	$ 1,500,000	$ 1,500,000


	Number of Shares	Capital Stock Amount	Share Subscriptions Received In Advance	Contributed Surplus	Deficit	Total

Balance, January 31, 2005	6,008,789	$ 20,274,104	$ 574,775	$ 212,914	$ (4,854,916)	$ 16,206,877
Private placements	748,450	3,028,000	(574,775)	-	-	2,453,225
Mineral property interests	45,000	180,000	-	-	-	180,000
Share subscriptions received	-	-	280,000	-	-	280,000
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-	417,757	-	417,757
Loss for the year	-	-	-	-	(8,883,273)	(8,883,273)

Balance, January 31, 2006	6,802,239	23,482,104	280,000	630,671	(13,738,189)	10,654,586
Private placements	1,470,200	6,380,800	(280,000)	-	-	6,100,800
Exercise of stock options	12,000	60,000	-	-	-	60,000
Exercise of warrants	526,500	2,157,425	-	-	-	2,157,425
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-	587,478	-	587,478
Loss for the year	-	-	-	-	(1,365,664)	(1,365,664)

Balance, January 31, 2007	8,810,939	32,080,329	-	1,218,149	(15,103,853)	18,194,625
Exercise of stock options	366,750	1,771,738	-	-	-	1,771,738
Exercise of warrants	926,150	3,845,050	-	-	-	3,845,050
Stock-based compensation	-	97,897	-	1,150,273	-	1,248,170
Loss for the year	-	-	-	-	(2,221,907)	(2,221,907)

Balance, January 31, 2008	10,103,839	$ 37,795,014	$ -	$ 2,368,422	$ (17,325,760)	$ 22,837,676

Number of Shares	Exercise Price	Expiry Date

300,000	$ 5.00	July 2, 2007
290,000	3.87	October 13, 2009
523,000	4.00	October 4, 2010

Number of Options Outstanding	Number Currently Exercisable	Exercise Price	Expiry Date

240,000	240,000	3.87	October 13, 2009
460,000	460,000	4.00	October 4, 2010
90,000	90,000	6.20	April 20, 2011
207,250	180,250	5.25	June 27, 2011 (1,250 exercised subsequently)
100,000	62,500	7.00	November 29, 2011
335,000	125,625	11.00	July 3, 2012
131,827	49,435	11.55	July 30, 2012

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiry Date

796,700	4.50	April 11, 2008 (all exercised subsequently)
489,800	6.00	July 28, 2008

	2006	2005

Future income tax assets:
Property and equipment	$ 34,000	$ 29,000
Mineral property interests and deferred exploration costs	3,150,000	274,000
Non-capital losses carried forward	706,000	540,000

	3,890,000	843,000

Future income tax liability:
Deferred exploration costs renounced	-	(9,000)

	3,890,000	834,000
Valuation allowance	(3,890,000)	(834,000)

Net future income tax assets	$ -	$ -

	2009	$ 253,455
	2010	446,886
	2011	315,101
	2015	438,676
	2016	605,469
	2027	808,472
	2028	958,758

	Total	$ 3,826,817