UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F20‑F

oREGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112012

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to _______________________

OR

oSHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report__________________________

Commission file number 001‑31317

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - Paulo–SABESP

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Basic Sanitation Company of the State of São Paulo‑SABESP

(Translation of the Registrant’s name into English)

Federative Republic of Brazil

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Rua Costa Carvalho, 300
05429‑900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

(Address of principal executive offices)

Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso


raffonso@sabesp.com.br

 (+
(+55 11 3388 8247)


Rua Costa Carvalho, 300 05429-90005429‑900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares(1), without par value

New York Stock Exchange*Exchange*

American Depositary Shares, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, each representing 2one Common SharesShare(1)(2)

New York Stock Exchange


__________________(1) On April 22, 2013 our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new Common Shares.

* Not for trading purposes, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(1)

(2) Until June 8, 2007,January 23, 2013, each American Depositary Share evidenced byrepresented two Common Shares.  As of January 24, 2013, each American Depositary Receipts, represented 250Share represents one Common Shares.Share.


 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:  None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

227,836,623683,509,869 Shares of Common Stock


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownwell‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YesþNoo

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

YesoNoþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesþNoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-TS‑T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YesþNoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-acceleratednon‑accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filerþAccelerated fileroNon-acceleratedNon‑accelerated filero

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAPoInternational Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards BoardþOthero

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow

Item 17oItem 18o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Exchange Act).

YesoNoþ

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of ContentsPage

Page

PART I

86

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

86

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

86

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

8KEY INFORMATION

6

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

2124

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

6271

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

6271

ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

8698

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

93107

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

100115

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

112123

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

116127

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

127139

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

127142

PART II

129143

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

129143

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

129143

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

129143

ITEM 1616.

[RESERVED]

130145

PART IIIITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

133145

ITEM 17.16B.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCODE OF ETHICS

133146

ITEM 18.16C.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

133146

ITEM 19.16D.

EXHIBITSExemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

133147

ITEM 16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

147

ITEM 16F.

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

147

ITEM 16g.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

148

ITEM 16H.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

150

PART III

150

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

150

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

150

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

151

SIGNATURES

153

i


 

 

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

General

We maintain our books and records inreais.  We preparedprepare our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 included in this annual report in complianceaccordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or the IASB.  Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the three years ended December 31, 2012 have been audited, as stated in the report appearing herein, and are included in this annual report on Form 20-F.

We also prepare individual financial statements in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP, which include the pronouncements issued by the CPC, for certain purposes, including for the calculation of dividends.

Convenience Translations

We have translated some of therealamounts contained in this annual report into U.S. dollars.  The rate used to translate such amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 20112012 was R$1.8762.0435 to US$1.00, which was the commercial rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars in effect on December 31, 2011,2012, as reported by the Central Bank.  The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this annual report is provided solely for the convenience of the reader and should not be construed as implying that therealamounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at the above rate.  See “Item 3.A. Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates” for more detailed information regarding the Brazilian foreign exchange system and historical data on the exchange rate of therealagainst the U.S. dollar.

Rounding

Some percentages and numbers included in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments.  Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.

Other Information

In this annual report, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company,” or “SABESP” refer to Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP.

In addition, references to:

§·        real,” “reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilianreal, the official currency of Brazil;

§·        “U.S. dollars” or “US$” are to the United States dollar, the official currency of the United States;

§·        “Brazil” are to the Federative Republic of Brazil;

§·        “State” are to the State of São Paulo, which is also our controlling shareholder;

§·        “federal government” and “Brazilian government” are to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil and “state government” are to the state government of the State of São Paulo;

§·        “São Paulo metropolitan region”region,” with respect to our operations, are to the area where the Metropolitan executive office operates, comprising 38 municipalities, including the city of São Paulo;

§·        “Regional systems” are to the area where the Regional systems executive office operates, comprising 325 municipalities in the interior and coastline regions of the State of São Paulo;

§·        “water coverage ratio” are to the ratio between the number of residences connected to the water supply network, divided by the number of urban residences in a certain area; and

§2


·        “sewage coverage ratio” are to the ratio between the number of residences connected to the sewage collection network, divided by the number of urban residences in a certain area.

Information in this annual report related to liters, water and sewage volumes, number of employees, kilometers, water and sewage connections, population served, operating productivity, water production rate, sewage lines (in kilometers), savings achieved and investment in improvement programs has not been audited.

Market Information


We make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to Brazil and the industry in which we operate.  We have made these statements on the basis of information from third-partythird‑party sources and publicly available information that we believe is reliable, such as informationand reports from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or IBGE, and the State Data Analysis System Foundation (Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados) or SEADE, among others.  We have no reason to believe any of this information is inaccurate in any material respect.

References to urban and total population in this annual report are estimated based on a research madeprepared by the SEADE:  “Projections for the State of São Paulo – Population and Residences until 2025” (Projeções para o Estado de São Paulo – População e Domicílios até 2025). 

3



 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ABOUT FORWARD‑LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report includes forward-lookingforward‑looking statements, mainly in Items 3 through 5.  We have based these forward‑looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting our business.  These forward-lookingforward‑looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other factors:

§·        general economic, political, demographical and other conditions in Brazil and in other emerging market countries;

§·        changes in applicable laws and regulations, as well as the enactment of new laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental, tax and employment matters in Brazil;

§·        fluctuations in inflation, interest rates and exchange rates in Brazil;

§·        the interests of our controlling shareholder;

§·        our ability to collect amounts owed to us by our controlling shareholder and by municipalities;

§·        our ability to continue to use certain reservoirs under current terms and conditions;

§·        our capital expenditure program and other liquidity and capital resources requirements;

§·        droughts, water shortages, intensive rainsrain and other climateclimatic events;

§·        power shortages, or rationing inof energy supply or significant changes in energy tariffs;

§·        the effects of the agreement for provision of water and sewage services in the cityCity of São Paulo, thatwhich we executed with the State and the cityCity of São Paulo;

§·        ourthe lack of formal agreements withbetween our company and certain municipalities to which we render ourprovide water and sewage services, including the cities comprising metropolitan regions;regions, and the fact that the State and municipal governments share competency regarding these services;

§·        the municipalities’ ability to terminate our existing concession agreements prior to their expiration date and our ability to renew such agreements;

§·        our ability to provide water and sewage services in additional municipalities and to maintain our rightsthe right to provide the services for which we currently contracted;have contracts;

§·        the size and growth of our customer base;

§·        our ability to comply with certain levels of services and attendance in the provision ofrequirements regarding water and sewage services establishedservice levels included in our agreements with the municipalities;

§·        our level of indebtednessdebt and limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness;debt;

§·        our ability to access financing with favorable terms in the future;

§·        ourthe costs relating to compliancewe incur in complying with environmental laws and potentialany penalties for failure to comply with these laws;

§·        our exposure to probable increases in the frequency of extreme weather conditions;

§·        the outcome of our pending or future legal proceedings;

§·        our management’s expectations and estimates relating to our future financial performance;

§4


·        the regulationregulations issued by the São Paulo State Sanitation and Energy Regulatory Agency, or the ARSESP, regarding several aspects of our business, including limitations on our ability to set and adjust our tariffs; and

§·        other risk factors as set forth under “Item 3.D. Risk Factors.”

The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect” and similar words are intended to identify forward-lookingforward‑looking statements.  In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward‑looking events and circumstances discussed in this annual report might not occur.  Our actual results could differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-lookingforward‑looking statements.  Forward‑looking statements speak only as of the date they were made and we do not undertake theany obligation to update or revise any forward-lookingforward‑looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law.  Any such forward‑looking statements are not an indication of future performance and involve risks.

5



 

PART I

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

A.Selected Financial Data

The tables below contain a summary of ourfollowing selected financial data as of and for each of the periods indicated.  The summary of our financial data was derived from our consolidated annual financial statements, prepared in compliance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.  You should be read this selected financial data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto), “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

The selected financial data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the related notes theretoyears ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, and included in this annual report.

The selected consolidated financial informationdata as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009 2010 and 2011 prepared in compliance with IFRS, has2008 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, which appear elsewhereis not included in this annual report.

We have included information with respect to the dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity paid to holders of our common shares since January 1, 2008 inreaisand in U.S. dollars translated fromreaisat the commercial market selling rate in effect as of the payment date under the caption “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy—Payment of Dividends.”  We prepare individual financial statements in accordance with Brazilian GAAP for certain purposes, including for the calculation of dividends.

The following tables present our selected financial data as of and for each of the periods indicated.

IFRS Summary Financial Data

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

(in millions ofreais, except per share and per ADS(1) data)

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

(in millions ofreais, except per share and per ADS(1) data)

Statement of operations data:

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services

8,579.5

9,231.0

9,941.6

Net operating revenues

5,262.7

10,754.4

9,941.6

9,231.0

8,579.5

7,809.3

Cost of sales and services

(5,087.3)

(5,194.5)

(6,031.1)

(3,163.9)

(6,465.4)

(6,031.1)

(5,194.5)

(5,087.3)

(4,482.9)

Gross profit

3,492.2

4,036.5

3,910.5

2,098.8

4,289.0

3,910.5

4,036.5

3,492.2

3,326.4

Selling expenses

(610.4)

(712.9)

(619.5)

(341.5)

(697.8)

(619.5)

(712.9)

(614.4)

(499.7)

Administrative expenses

(717.1)

(653.2)

(846.6)

(355.3)

(726.1)

(846.6)

(653.2)

(717.1)

(580.0)

Operating profit

2,120.3

2,672.2

2,354.3

1,392.4

2,845.3

2,354.3

2,672.2

2,120.3

2,121.2

Financial income (expenses), net

(10.0)

(379.4)

(633.6)

(147.5)

(301.4)

(633.6)

(379.4)

(10.0)

(973.0)

Net income

1,507.7

1,630.5

1,223.4

935.6

1,911.9

1,223.4

1,630.5

1,507.7

862.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic and diluted(2)

6.62

7.16

5.37

1.37

2.80

1.79

2.39

2.21

1.26

Earnings per ADS – basic and diluted

13.24

14.32

10.74

Earnings per ADS – basic and diluted (*) (2)

1.37

2.80

1.79

2.39

2.21

1.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity per share(2)

1.73

2.00

1.27

0.32

0.66

0.43

0.57

0.58

0.43

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

227,836,623

Dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity per ADS (*) (2)

0.32

0.66

0.43

0.57

0.58

0.43

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (2)

 

683,509,869

683,509,869

683,509,869

_________________

______________

(1)   American Depositary Shares, or ADS.ADSs.

 

As of December 31,

 

2009

2010

2011

 

(in millions ofreais)  

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (*)

190.4

249.6

356.5

Intangible assets, net (*)

16,917.5

18,546.8

20,141.7

Total assets

20,243.1

23,350.6

25,215.0

Short-term loans and financing

1,009.9

1,242.1

1,630.0

Long-term loans and financing

5,548.0

7,022.5

6,966.3

Interest on shareholders’ equity payable

365.4

354.3

247.5

Total liabilities

11,804.5

13,668.8

14,669.1

Shareholders’ equity

8.438.6

9,681.8

10,545.9

Capital stock

6,203.7

6,203.7

6,203.7

 

 

 

 

Other financial information:

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

2,072.5

2,083.0

2,717.1

Cash used in investing activities

(1,964.0)

(2,091.4)

(2,008.3)

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

36.9

1,226.5

(548.0)

Capital expenditures

(1,982.4)

(1,901.5)

2,211.1

___________________

(*)   Reclassification between property, plan and equipment and intangible assets,On January 10, 2013, our board of directors approved a change in the amountsratio of R$139.8 millionAmerican Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), to common shares on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), from 1:2 to 1:1.  We have calculated the earnings per ADS and dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity per ADS for the 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, according to a ratio of 1:1 for comparison purposes.

(2)   On April 22, 2013, our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares. Therefore, the per share information in 2009.the selected financial data has been revised to give effect to the stock split retrospectively to all periods presented.

6



 

Operating Data

 

As of December 31,

 

2012

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

 

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

(in millions ofreais

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

187.6

383.4

356.5

249.6

190.4

179.4

Intangible assets

10,761.9

21,991.9

20,141.7

18,546.8

16,917.5

15,462.8

Total assets

13,054.0

26,675.8

25,215.0

23,350.6

20,243.1

18,711.3

Current portion of long-term loans and financing

669.1

1,367.4

1,630.0

1,242.1

1,009.9

1,446.6

Long‑term loans and financing

3,769.0

7,701.9

6,966.3

7,022.5

5,548.0

5,414.3

Interest on shareholders’ equity payable

202.8

414.4

247.5

354.3

365.4

275.0

Total liabilities

7,320.9

14,960.2

14,669.1

13,668.8

11,804.5

11,386.3

Equity

5,733.1

11,715.6

10,545.9

9,681.8

8,438.6

7,325.0

Capital stock

3,035.8

6,203.7

6,203.7

6,203.7

6,203.7

6,203.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other financial information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash generated from by operating activities

1,143.2

2,336.2

2,717.1

2,083.0

2,072.5

2,103.9

Cash used in investing activities

(978.1)

(1,998.8)

(2,008.3)

(2,091.4)

(1,964.0)

(1,640.3)

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(277.1)

(566.3)

(548.0)

1,226.5

36.9

(295.2)

Purchases of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment as presented in our statement of cash flow

(995.1)

(2,033.5)

(2,211.1)

(1,901.5)

(1,982.4)

(1,545.9)

 

As of and for the year ended December 31,

Operating Data

 

 

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

As of and for the year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Number of water connections (in thousands)

6,767

6,945

7,118

7,295

7,481

7,679

7,481

7,295

7,118

6,945

Number of sewage connections (in thousands)

5,167

5,336

5,520

5,718

5,921

6,128

5,921

5,718

5,520

5,336

Percentage of population with water connections (in percentages)

99

99

Percentage of population with sewer connections (in percentages)

79

80

81

82

83

82

81

80

79

Percentage of treated sewer (3) (in percentages)

77

76

75

74

72

Volume of water billed during period (in millions of cubic meters)

1,847

1,878

1,917

1,992

2,045

2,094

2,045

1,992

1,917

1,878

Water loss percentage during period (average)(in percentages)(1)

29.5

27.9

26.0

25.6

Water loss per connection (average)(2)

467

436

402

403

395

Water loss percentage during period (average) (in percentages)(4)

25.7

25.6

26.0

27.9

Water loss per connection (average)(5)

393

395

403

402

436

Number of employees

16,850

16,649

15,103

15,330

14,896

15,019

14,896

15,330

15,103

16,649

___________________

(1)______________

(2)   On April 22, 2013, our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares. Therefore, the per share information in the selected financial data has been revised to give effect to the stock split retrospectively to all periods presented.

(3)   Treated sewage as a percentage of collected sewage.

(4)   Includes both physical and non‑physical losses.water loss.  Water loss percentage represents the quotient of (i) the difference between (a) the total amount of water produced by us less (b) the total amount of water invoiced by us to customers minus (c) the volume of water set out below that we exclude from our calculation of water losses,loss, divided by (ii) the total amount of water produced. 

We exclude the following from our calculation of water losses the following:loss:  (i) water discharged for periodic maintenance of water mains and water storage tanks; (ii) water supplied for municipal uses such as firefighting; (iii) water we consume in our facilities; and (iv) estimated water losses associated withloss related to the supply of water we supply tofavelas(shantytowns).

(2)(5)   Measured in liters/connection per day, according to the method of measuring ourby which we measure water losses,loss, based on worldwide market practice for the sector.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Description of Our Activities—Water Operations—Water Losses.Loss.

7


 

Exchange Rates

In the past, the Brazilian National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional), or the CMN, has introduced changes to the Brazilian foreign exchange regime, such as unifying the Commercial and Floating Markets and easing the rules governing the ability of Brazilian residents’ abilityresidents to acquire foreign currency, among others.  On March 24, 2010, the CMN and the Central Bank approved Resolution No. 3,844, under which led to a series of measures were adopted to consolidate and simplify acts and proceedings applicable toBrazilian foreign exchange market regulations in Brazil.regulations.

The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows for theany person or legal entity to purchase and sale ofor sell foreign currency and themake international transfertransfers ofreaisby any person or legal entity,, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.

The Brazilian currency has during the last few decades, experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies.currencies in recent decades.  Between 2003 and mid-2008,mid‑2008, therealappreciated significantly against the U.S. dollar with the exchange rate reaching R$1.634 in August 2008.  Primarily as a result of the global financial crisis, therealdepreciated 32.0% against the U.S. dollar during 2008 and closed the year at R$2.337 per US$1.00, but 1.00.  Thereal strengthened duringagain by 25.5% in 2009 and 2010. In 2011, the real suffered a deprecitation of 12.6%4.3% in 2010, but depreciated against the U.S. dollar.dollar by 12.6% in 2011 and 8.94% in 2012.  On December 31, 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, thereal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$1.741,2.043, R$1.6661.876 and R$1.8761.666 per US$1.00, respectively.

The Central Bank has intervened occasionallysometimes intervenes in the market to combat instability in foreign exchange rates.  We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let therealfloat freely or will intervene in the exchange rate through a currency band system or otherwise.other proceedure.  Therealmay fluctuate against the U.S. dollar substantially in the future.  For further information on these risks,this risk, see “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil—Exchange rate instability may adversely affect us and the market price of our common shares or ADSs.”

The following tables set forth the selling rate, expressed inreaisper U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated.

 

R$ per US$1.00

Year ended December 31,

Year end

Average(1)

High

Low

2007

1.771

1.948

2.156

1.733

2008

2.337

1.837

2.500

1.559

2009

1.741

1.994

2.422

1.702

2010

1.666

1.759

1.881

1.655

2011

1.876

1.675

1.902

1.535


  

R$ per US$1.00

Month ended

Period end

Average(1)

High

Low

December 31, 2011

1.876

1.837

1.876

1.783

January 31, 2012

1.739

1.790

1.868

1.739

February 29, 2012

1.709

1.718

1.738

1.702

March 31, 2012

1.822

1.795

1.833

1.715

April 27, 2012 (through April 23,2012)

1.8861.8451.889

1.826

_______________

Source:  Central Bank

(1)   Average of the exchange rates on the last day of each period.

On April 23, 2012, the exchange rate published by the Central Bank was R$1.886 per US$1.00.  Exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of therealprice of our common shares on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBOVESPA S.A. -Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros), or the BM&FBOVESPA, as well as the U.S. dollar equivalent of any distributions we make inreaiswith respect to our common shares.

The following tables set forth the selling rate, expressed inreaisper U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated.

 

R$ per US$1.00

Year ended December 31,

Year end

Average(1)

High

Low

2008

2.3370

1.8375

2.5004

1.5593

2009

1.7412

1.9935

2.4218

1.7024

2010

1.6662

1.7593

1.8811

1.6554

2011

1.8758

1.6746

1.9016

1.5345

2012

2.0435

1.9550

2.1121

1.7024

 

R$ per US$1.00

Month ended

Period end

Average(1)

High

Low

October 31, 2012

2.0313

2.0298

2.0382

2.0224

November 30, 2012

2.1074

2.0678

2.1074

2.0312

December 31, 2012

2.0435

2.0778

2.1121

2.0435

January 31, 2013

1.9883

2.0311

2.0471

1.9883

February 28, 2013

1.9754

1.9733

1.9893

1.9550

March 31, 2013

2.0138

1.9828

2.0185

1.9528

April 30, 2013

2.0017

2.0022

2.0244

1.9736

May 2013 (through May 8, 2013)

2.0030

2.0094

2.0143

2.0030

______________

Source:  Central Bank

(1)   Average of the exchange rates on the last day of each period.

8


The following tables set forth the selling rate, expressed inreais per Japanese Yen (R$/¥1.00):

 

R$ per¥1.00 

Year ended December 31,

Year end

Average(1)

High

Low

2008

0.0258

0.0180

0.0272

0.0144

2009

0.0188

0.0213

0.0268

0.0186

2010

0.0205

0.0201

0.0212

0.0183

2011

0.0243

0.0211

0.0249

0.0186

2012

0.0237

0.0245

0.0263

0.0211

 

R$ per¥1.00 

Month ended

Period end

Average(1)

High

Low

October 31, 2012

0.0255

0.0255

0.0259

0.0252

November 30, 2012

0.0237

0.0248

0.0257

0.0237

December 31, 2012

0.0218

0.0228

0.0235

0.0218

January 31, 2013

0.0214

0.0212

0.0216

0.0209

February 28, 2013

0.0214

0.0209

0.0214

0.0203

March 31, 2013

0.0205

0.0206

0.0218

0.0199

April 30, 2013

0.0205

0.0205

0.0218

0.0199

May 2013 (through May 8, 2013)

0.0203

0.0203

0.0205

0.0203

______________

Source:  Central Bank

(1)   Average of the exchange rates on the last day of each period.

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D.Risk Factors

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy.  This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely affect us and the market price of our common shares and ADSs.

The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations.  The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increaseschanges in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price and tariff controls, currency devaluations,devaluation or appreciation, capital controls and limits on imports.  Our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as the market price of our common shares or ADSs, may be adversely affected by changes in public policy at federal, state and municipal levels with respect to public tariffs and exchange controls, as well as other factors, such as:

§9


·        the regulatory environment related to our business operations and concession agreements;

§·        interest rates;

§·        exchange rates and exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

§·        currency fluctuations;

§·        inflation; 

§·        liquidity of the Brazilian capital and lending markets;

§·        tax and regulatory policies and laws;

§·        economic and social instability; and

§·        other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

For example, the Brazilian government may change its tax policy, such as changing tax rates or imposing temporary taxes.  If overall taxes are increased, we may be unable to immediately recover the difference from our consumers, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government will implement changes in policies or regulations affecting these factors or other factorsothers may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities marketsmarket and in the securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which could have a material adverse effect on us and on our common shares and ADSs.


Inflation and the Brazilian government’s measures to combat inflation may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil, adversely affecting us and the market price of our common shares or ADSs.

Brazil has in the past, experienced extremely high rates of inflation.inflation in the past.  Inflation and the Brazilian government’s measures to combat inflation have had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy, contributing to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets.market.  The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have often included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and reducing economic growth.  The Special Clearing and Settlement System (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia), or SELIC, the official overnight interest rate in Brazil, equaled 7.14%, 10.91% and 10.66% at the end of 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011 was 8.65%, 10.66% and 10.91% respectively, in line with the target rate set by the Brazilian Committee on Monetary Policy (Comitê de Política Monetária), or COPOM..   

The annual rate of inflation, as measured by the General Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços—Mercado), or IGP-MIGP‑M index, fell from 9.95% in 2000 to 3.83% in 2006, increased to 7.75% in 2007 and further increased to 9.81% in 2008.  According to the IGP-MIGP‑M index, in 2009, there was aBrazil underwent deflation of 1.71% in 2009, followed by inflation of 7.81%, 5.1% and the rate of inflation for11.32% in 2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011 were 11.32% and 5.1% respectively.  Brazilian governmental actions, including interest rate decreases, intervention in the foreign exchange market and actions to adjust or fix the value of thereal, may trigger increases in inflation.  If Brazil again experiences high inflation again, our costs and expenses may rise, we may be unable to increase our tariffs to counter the effects of inflation, and our overall financial performance may be adversely affected.  In addition, a substantial increase in inflation may weaken investors’ confidence in Brazil, causing a declinedecrease in the market price of our common shares or ADSs.

Additionally, in the event of an increase in inflation, the Brazilian government may choose to raise official interest rates.  Increases in interest rates would not only affect our cost of funding, but could also have a material adverse effect on us and may also adversely affect the market price of our common shares or ADSs.

Exchange rate instability may adversely affect us and the market price of our common shares or ADSs.

The Brazilian currency experienced frequent and substantial devaluations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies during the last decades.decades leading up to the mid-1990s.  Throughout this period, the Braziliangovernment has implemented various economic plans and utilized a number of exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini‑devaluations during(during which the frequency of adjustments ranged from daily to monthly,monthly), floating exchange rate systems, exchange controls and dual exchange rate markets.  From time to time since that period, there have beencontinued to be significant fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Brazilianrealand the U.S. dollar and other currencies.  For example, therealappreciated 13.8%, 9.5% and 20.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.  In 2008, primarily as a result of the worsening of the international economicglobal financial crisis, therealdepreciated by 32.0% against the U.S. dollar.  Indollar and closed the year at R$2.337 per US$1.00.  Thereal strengthened again by 25.5% in 2009 and 4.3% in 2010, but depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 12.6% in 2011 and 8.94% in 2012.  On December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, therealappreciated 25.5% and 4.3% against the /U.S. dollar closing atexchange rate was R$1.7412.043, R$1.876 and R$1.666 per US$1.00, respectively.  In 2011, therealsuffered a depreciation of 12.6% against the U.S. dollar, closing at R$1.876 per US$1.00.There can be no assurance that therealwill not depreciate further depreciate against the U.S. dollar.  As of April 23,2012,23, 2013, the commercial selling rate as reported by the Central Bank was R$ 1.8862.0435 per US$1.00.

10


Depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar could create inflationary pressures in Brazil and cause increases in interest rates, which could negatively affect the growth of the Brazilian economy as a whole and harm our financial condition and results of operations, curtail our access to financial markets and prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies.  Depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar cancould also as in the context of the current global economic recovery, lead to decreased consumer spending, deflationary pressures and reduced growth of the economy as whole.

In the event of a significant devaluation of therealin relation to the U.S. dollar or other currencies, our ability to meet our foreign currency denominated obligations could be adversely affected particularly because our tariff revenue and other sources of income are denominated solely inreais.  In addition, because we have debt denominated in foreign currency denominated indebtedness,currencies, any significant devaluation of therealwill increase our financial expenses as a result of foreign exchange losses that we must record.  We had a total foreign currency denominated indebtednessdebt of R$3,053.43,215.8 million as of December 31, 2011,2012 and we anticipate that we may incur substantial additional amounts of foreign currency denominated indebtednessdebt in the future.  In 2011,2012, our results of operations were negatively affected by the 12.6%8.94% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar, and an appreciation of the real against the yen by 2.43% which amountedled to a R$382.3 million.50.5 million negative impact on our foreign exchange result, net.  We do not currently have any hedgingderivative instruments in place to protect us against a devaluation of thereal in relation to any foreign currency.  A devaluation of therealmay adversely affect us and the market price of our common shares or ADSs.


Developments and the perception of risk in other countries, especially in the United States and in emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market price of Brazilian securities, including our common shares and ADSs.

The market price of securities of Brazilian companies is affected to varying degrees by economic and market conditions in other countries, including the United States and other Latin American and emerging market countries.  Although economic conditions in these countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market price of securities of Brazilian issuers.  CrisisCrises in other emerging market countries or economic policies of other countries may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours.  This could adversely affect the market price of our common shares or ADSs, and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future, on acceptable terms or at all.

The global financial crisis has hadcaused significant consequences, including in Brazil, such as stock and credit market volatility, unavailability of credit, higher interest rates, a general slowdown of the world economy, volatile exchange rates, and inflationary pressure, among others, which have and may continue to, directly or indirectly, materially and adversely affect us and the price of securities issued by Brazilian companies, including our common shares and ADSs. 

Risks Relating to Our Control by the State of São Paulo

We are controlled by the State of São Paulo, whose interests may differ from our or from minority shareholders’the interests which could have a material adverse effect on us.of non-controlling, including holders of ADSs.

TheAs it owns the majority of our common shares, the State of São Paulo through its ownership of our common shares, has the abilityis able to determine our operating policies and strategy, to control the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors and to appoint our senior management.  As of April 23,2012,23, 2013, the State owned 50.3% of our outstanding common shares.

The State has directed from time to time in the past, and may direct in the future,11


Both through its control of our board of directors and through the enactment ofas well as by enacting State decrees, that wethe State has in the past directed our company to engage in certain business activities and make certain expenditures that promotepromoted political, economic or social goals but that dodid not necessarily also enhance our business and results of operations.  The State may direct our company to act in this manner again in the future.  These decisions by the State may not be in the interests of our non-controlling, including holders of ADSs.  See “Item 5.A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations.Certain Transactions with Controlling Shareholder.

Following the 2010 elections for State governor in 20112010, the new governor electedappointed Ms. Dilma Seli Pena as our chief executive officer in 2011, and Mr. Edson de Oliveira Giriboni, the Secretary of State for the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources (Secretaria de Saneamento e Recursos Hídricos do Estado de São Paulo), was elected as chairman of our board of directors.  Future changes in policy by State government may cause changes in all or some of the members of our management, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We have a substantial amount of accounts receivable owed to us by theThe State and some State entities and weowe us substantial unpaid debts.  We cannot assure you as to when or whether the State will pay us.

Historically, the State and some State entities have haddelayed payment of substantial overdue accounts payableamounts owed to us relatingrelated to (i) the provision of water and sewage services and (ii)services. Aditionally, the State also owes us substantial amounts related to reimbursements of State‑mandated special retirement and pension payments that we make to some of our former employees for which the State is required to reimburse us.  As of December 31, 2011, the amounts owed to us by2012, the State owed us R$65.5 million for the provision of water and sewage services totaled R$145.4 million.services.  With respect to payment of pensions on behalf of the State, we had a non-contested reimbursement in the amount of R$196.9 million as of December 31, 2011, we believe that2012 for actuarial liability, and a contested amount of R$1,351.2 million as of the State owed to us R$1,290.7million, butsame date.  We do not record this contested amount as a reimbursement for actuarial liability due to the uncertainty regardingof payment by the recovery of the amount our management decided not to record the reimbursements that we believe are due to us.State.  In addition, as of December 31, 2011,2012, we had recorded a provision for an actuarial liability in the amount of R$1,512.11,547.2 million in respect of future supplemental pension payments the State does not believe it is responsibleaccept responsibility for paying.  AmountsThe amounts owed to us by the State for water and sewage services and reimbursements for pensions paid may increase in the future.

We have entered into agreements with the State to settle thesethe overdue amounts payablethat relate to us.water and sewage services.  For a detailed discussion of these agreements, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions, Agreements with the State of São Paulo” and Note 8 toof our consolidated financial statements.  Pursuant toUnder these agreements, the State agreed that the amounts due with respect to water and sewage services through December 2007 could be settled through the application of dividends payable by us to the State.  In December 2007, the State agreed to pay us the outstanding balance in the amountas of November 30, 2007 of R$133.7 million (as of November 30, 2007), in 60 consecutive monthly installments, beginning on January 2, 2008, and an amount of R$236.1 million relating to parta portion of the accounts overdue and unpaid invoices from March 2004 through October 2007 regarding the provision offor water supply and sewage collection services.  We agreed to pay the State, in the period from January through March 2008, the outstanding balance of dividends owed to it in the formrespect of interest on shareholders’equity duein our company from March 2004 through December 2006, in the amount of R$400.8 million, in the period from January through March 2008. million.


In March 2008, we entered into a commitment agreement with the State forto settle the settlement of outstanding debtsdebt related to the reimbursement of the pension benefits.  Pursuant tobenefits we paid on the State’s behalf.  For a detailed discussion of this commitment agreement, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions―Agreements with the State of São Paulo.”  Under this commitment agreement, we and the State agreed that the amounts dueowed to us with respect to payments ofthe pensions we paid on behalf of the State maycould be partially settled through the transfer to us of certain reservoirs to us that we use in the Alto Tietê System, that we use andwhich are owned by the State.  InFollowing this commitment agreement, in November 2008 we and the State entered into ana formal agreement with the State relating to payments ofthe pension benefits made by uswe paid on itsthe State’s behalf.  TheUnder this agreement, the State acknowledged that it owed us the outstanding balancea total of R$915.3 million in this regard as of September 30, 2008, relating to payments of pension benefits made by us on its behalf.  Weand we provisionally accepted the reservoirs in the Alto Tietê System as partial payment (R$696.3 million) subject to the transfer of the property rights of thesein the reservoirs to us.  In November 2008, the State began payingto pay us the remaining balance in the amount of R$219.0 million in 114 successive monthly installments.  We are unableinstallments through to predict whether and when these reservoirs will be transferred to us becauseearly 2018.  However, on October 29, 2003 the Public ProsecutionProsecutor’s Office of the State of São Paulo (Ministério Público do Estado de São Paulo) filed a civil public actioncommenced legal proceedings alleging that athe transfer to us of ownership of the Alto Tietê System reservoirs is illegal.  The Company and the São Paulo State Government are working together to obtain legislative authorization to transfer the reservoirs to us overcomingwould be illegal, on the uncertainties arising from the public lawsuit challenging the absence of abasis that there is no specific legislative authorization for the transfer oftransfer. We are unable to predict, however, whether and when these reservoirs will be transferred to us and therefore whether and when we will receive paymentor assets equivalent to the property of the reservoirs.

R$696.3 million owed.  See “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Other Legal Proceedings.”

12


In addition to the R$915.3 million that the State acknowledgesacknowledged that it owesowed us pursuant tounder the November 2008 agreement, we are also negotiating with the State in respect to the further amountsamount that the State does not recognizeaccept that it owes us.  While we continue to negotiate directly with the State, weWe are not able to assure you that we will be successful in these negotiations.  Accordingly, as of December 31, 2011,2012, we have not recorded R$1,290.71,351.2 million related to reimbursementsthe reimbursement that we believe areis due to us for the pension benefits we paid on behalf of the State,State’s behalf, but we have recorded R$1,512.11.547.2 million in pension obligations.

We cannot assure you when or if the State will pay the totalremaining overdue amounts owed toit owes us.  Due to the State’s history of not making timely payments topaying us in respect ofa timely manner for water and sewage services, and of not reimbursing us in a timely manner for the payments of pensionspension benefits we paid on its behalf, of the State, we cannot assure you that the amount of accounts receivableaccount receivables owed to us by the State and some State entities will not significantly increase in the future.

In addition, certain municipalities and other government entities also owe us money.  See “—We may face difficulties in collecting overdue amounts owed to us by municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis and municipal government entities.”

A state controlled company that has a concession to produce energy in the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs may require us to pay damages for the use of water from these reservoirs.

Empresa Metropolitana de Águas e Energia S.A., or EMAE, may require us to financially compensate them for our use of water from the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs, which they view as a loss of electricity that could otherwise be generated and sold. Additionally, payments to EMAE, which we were supposed to have made by a specific deadline, were not made. As such, EMAE has requested compensation from us. In the event water from these reservoirs was no longer made available to us, we would have to bring water in from locations further away, which would increase the risk of not being able to provide adequate service in the region, as well as an increase in water transportation costs.

The majority shareholder of both EMAE and us, the state of São Paulo, may force a resolution regarding the dispute of water use from the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs, which may have an adverse affect on our business.

Additionally, in the event we are required to make  payments and compensation, our cash position and overall liquidity may be adversely affected.

We may be required to acquire reservoirs that we use and that are owned by a State-controlled company, or we may be required to pay substantial charges tofor the owner with respect to our use of these reservoirs.reservoirs that are not our property.

In connection with the provision of water services, weWe use the Billings and Guarapiranga reservoirs which are owned by a State‑controlled company, the Water and Energy Metropolitan Company (Empresa Metropolitana de Águas e Energia S.A.), or the EMAE.in order to provide water services.  We are entitled to usewithdraw water from these reservoirs based onunder a grant issued byfrom the State Department of Water and Energy (Departamento de Águas e Energia Elétrica do Estado de São Paulo), or DAEE. The State, through its control of our board of directors, could require us to acquire the Billings and Guarapiranga reservoirs.  As a result of these acquisitions, our cash position and overall financial condition could be adversely affected.  In addition, since weWe are not currently charged for the use of these reservoirs weand are uncertain as to whether we will continue to be able to use the reservoirs without paying charges, or what the likely fee scale would be if one were imposed.  We may also be required to pay additional maintenance and operational costs for our use of the Billings and Guarapirangathese reservoirs.  If we were required to pay substantial charges to the owner or additional maintenance or operational costs for our use of these reservoirs, we could be materially and adversely affected.

13


Risks Relating to Our Business

We cannot anticipateThe Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the effects that further developmentsprocess of implementation and interpretation, and doubts remain as to its full impact on the industry.  ARSESP, the regulator, has the function to implement regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law within the State of São Paulo, and its interpretation willis in the process of reviewing, implementing and proposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage regulations, including potentially significant changes to the tariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of the changes that are currently proposed, may have an adverse effect on the basic sanitation industry in Brazil and on us.our business.

Although Law No. 11,445, or the Basic Sanitation Law, was enacted on January 5, 2007.  While it has been in effect for more than five years, it is still insince early 2007, the full implementation of a number of its early stages of implementation in Brazil, and we continueprovisions remains subject to be unable to anticipate all of the effectsregulations that it might have on our operations and business.  There are still several uncertainties related to the interpretation of the Basic Sanitation Law.  On June 21, 2010, the federal government enactednot yet been published.  Federal Decree No. 7,217, regulatingwhich was enacted on June 21, 2010, and Law 11,445 implemented a first series of new principles under the Basic Sanitation Law.  Among other things, Law, No. 11,445 and Federal Decree No. 7,217 provided that (i)including the following:

·for public‑public partnership contracts (or program contracts), public hearings regarding themust be held with respect to bid announcements, and technical and economic viability studies are requirements for the validity of public-must be carried out;

public partnership contracts (program contracts) ; (ii) ·the rights and obligations including penalties, of customers and service providers, shall be ruledincluding penalties, are determined by the owner of the public service, not by the regulatory agency; (iii)

·the technical and financial feasibility may be demonstrated by meansviability of the requirement for new investments, other thanprovision of water and sewage services should be determined based on (i) capital contributions necessary to offer the proceeds arisingservices and (ii) expected revenues from the renderingprovision of services;the service; and (iv)

·when a regulated service is divided and renderedto be provided by different service providers, the services will be considered as interdependent and will be subject tothose providers must execute an agreement that will regulate the activities of the different services providers.  regulating their respective activities. 

We cannot currently anticipate all the effects that the lawBasic Sanitation Law and the decree will have on our business and operations, if any.


Pursuant to theThe Basic Sanitation Law tariff regulation isrequires states to be performed by anestablish independent regulatory entity.  To exercise this assignment,regulators with the Stateresponsibility of São Paulo created themonitoring basic sanitation services and regulating tariffs.  Federal law No. 11,445/07 and São Paulo State SanitationLaw No. 1,025/07 established the ARSESP, which regulates and Energy Regulatory Agency, or the ARSESP. The ARSESP is the State agency responsible for regulatingsupervises the basic sanitation industry, including tariff regulation in certain municipalities.  The ARSESP acts as tariff regulator both in municipalities where the State provides basic sanitation services (municipalities in metropolitan areas), and in those municipalities that have delegated their regulatory powers to the State through cooperation agreements.  The ARSESP presently regulates our tariff structure and adjustments pursuant to the same tariff structure and adjustment formula that we otherwise apply.  Pursuant to a cooperation agreement among the State and some municipalities, the ARSESP also regulates our tariffsprovide in municipalities that have selectedagreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction.  For the municipalities that have not yet agreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction for which we currently provide basic sanitation services, we determine tariffs based on State Decree 41,446/96. ARSESP to regulate our tariffs.has proposed or enacted a number of regulatory changes, including the following:

Since ·In2008, the tariff adjustment formula was reviewed.In 2009, ARSESP has been developing new concepts inopened the methodology for tariff structurerevisions for public discussion and adjustment formula.hearings. In July 30, 2010, the ARSESP published Resolution No. 156 establishing156.  This resolution established the methodology and general criteria for the definitionvaluation of our regulatory asset base in order to move forward with thebe used for purposes of tariff review processprocesses and to define the initial parameters of the auditing process that the ARSESP will have to conduct pursuant to the terms of the Basic Sanitation Law.  Throughoutauditing. During 2011 and 2012 the ARSESP commencedheld further public consultations regarding the methodology for tariff revisions. Therevisions, which was finally specified and disclosed in April 2012.  In November 2012, ARSESP estimates thatpublished a finalpreliminary technical note for public hearing at which ourconsultation, proposing a preliminary initial maximum average tariff (P0) and efficiency gains factor (X), based on a preliminary evaluation of assets held by us.  Following further public consultations, in March 2013 ARSESP published two resolutions, Resolution No. 406 and Resolution No. 407.

·Resolution No. 406 sets out the following:  (i) an initial maximum average tariff structure will be subjected(P0) and a preliminary asset base value to public scrutiny will be scheduled by November 2012. However, althoughapply until the ARSESP has indicated that it will implementconclusion of an external audit of our asset base, resulting in a tariff revision of 2.3509%; (ii) authorizes the new tariff methodology in 2012, we cannot assure you when the new rules will be enacted, and the aforementioned schedule may suffer alterations or be subjectrepayment to delays. We cannot anticipate the additional changes that the ARSESP will implement on our tariff structure and adjustment formula or the effects that these changes will have on us.  If the changes are unfavorable to us, they could materially and adversely affect us.

Furthermore, since Law No. 11,445 permits municipalities to create their own regulatory agencies rather than being subjected to overview by the ARSESP, a number of municipalities created their own regulatory agencies. The municipality of Lins, which had decided in 2007 to create its own regulatory authority, revised this decision in 2010 and transferred the regulationconsumers of the water activities performed in Lins, including the setting of tariffs to the ARSESP. Lins has retained, however, the power to ultimately approve the tariff set by the ARSESP.  The municipalities in which the hydrographic basins of the rivers Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí are located have created a consortium for regulation and supervision rate of 0.5% immediately after the conclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in the bills in the municipalities where it will be charged; (iii) ARSESP also establishes an annual tariff adjustment formula, to be implemented during the second tariff cycle, consisting of the IPCA variation (a consumer price index) for the period, adjusted by an efficiency factor designed to transfer a portion of our activitiesproductivity gains to consumers, and further adjusted to reflect changes in that area. As this regulatory entity has recently been created, we cannot predict how it may implement regulation changes that may affect our activities. If other municipalities create new agencies or retain regulatory powers,service quality to be defined and applied as of the third year of the second tariff cycle.  According to ARSESP’s timetable the finalmaximum average tariff (P0) will be announced in August 2013 after the asset base value presented by us is audited.

14


·A tariff revision of to a rate of 2.3509% was implemented in April 2013 pursuant to Resolution No. 406. Additionally, we will pass an inspection fee of 0.5% to consumers immediately after the conclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in the bills to municipalities where it will be subjectcharged.

·Resolution No. 407 authorizes us to their regulation, supervision and limitations to our services. We cannot foresee any changes that any such new agency may implement regarding our business, and if the changes are unfavorable, they could materially and adversely affect us.

Pursuantpass on to the Basic Sanitation Law,service bill legal charges defined by municipal legislation, which under the Program Contracts and the Sewage and Water Supply Service Contracts must be considered in the tariff revision.

In April 2013, ARSESP has enacted, in 2009, certain rules establishing (i)passed Resolution No. 413, which effectively suspended Resolution No. 407, thereby postponing the general conditionsauthorization for the services we render, (ii)passing on of a municipal tax to consumers’ bills, which, prior to this Resolution, had been established in Resolution No. 407. The final decision regarding Resolution No. 407 has been postponed until August 2013.

In August 2012, ARSESP published Resolution No. 346, which established the communication processprinciple that users should be compensated for any failureinterruptions in our services; (iii) penalties for deficiencies in the provision of basic sanitation services; and (iv) procedures for confidential treatment of our clients’ private information.  We are currently evaluating the enforceability and legality of some of these rules.water supply.  Implementation of these rules started during 2011 and is expected to continue for the next few years.  The implementation of these rules will impact our commercial and operations processes and may adversely affect us as described below and in other ways we cannot currently predict.this regulation has been suspended pending further technical discussions.

In particular, regarding changes to the general conditions for our services, in 2011, the ARSESP altered the standard contract that we are required to use in our relationships with retail costumers. The ARSESP changed the rule regarding the collection of water and sewage tariff,customers, requiring that collectioninvoices be directedsent to the consumer of our services,the service rather than to the owner of the served property, as used to be the case.property.  We estimate that this change will affect ongoing legal disputes, particularly those regarding collection procedures, as well as business discussions in general.  However,Since this change is still being implemented, we are not currently able to predict its impact on our business.

In 2009 ARSESP enacted rules regarding the following:

·general terms and conditions for water and sewage services;

·procedures for communication regarding any failure in our services;

·penalties for deficiencies in the provision of basic sanitation services; and

·procedures for confidential treatment of our customers’ private information.

We are currently evaluating the enforceability and legality of some of these rules.  Implementation of these rules started during 2011, is currently ongoing, and is expected to continue for the next few years.  The implementation of the above mentioned rules will impact our commercial and operations processes, and may adversely affect us in ways we cannot currently predict.

The Basic Sanitation Law also allows municipalities to create their own regulatory agencies rather than being subjected to overview by ARSESP, and a number of municipalities have therefore created their own regulatory agencies.  For example:

·The municipality of Lins, which had decided in 2007 to create its own regulatory authority, revisited this decision in 2010 and transferred the regulation of water activities in Lins, including the setting of tariffs, to ARSESP.  Lins has retained, however, the power to ultimately approve the tariff set by ARSESP.

·The municipalities in which the hydrographic basins of the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí rivers are located created a consortium for the regulation and supervision of our activities in that area in 2011.  We are currently involved in legal proceedings in which this consortium is claiming that it has jurisdiction over our activities in the municipality of Piracaia and that ARSESP has no right to regulate our activities or set tariffs in the municipality.  We cannot predict the outcome of this change oncase or how it may impact our business, as the change is still being implemented. business.

15



 

If other municipalities create new agencies or retain regulatory powers, we will be subject to regulation and supervision by them and to any limitations on our services that they may set.  We cannot foresee any changes that any such new agency may implement regarding our business.  If any such changes are unfavorable, they could materially and adversely affect us.

For more information on ARSESP regulations, see “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Tariffs,” “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulation——”Tariff Regulation in the State of São Paulo” and “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulation—Consumer“Consumer Relations in the State of São Paulo.”

New joint entities will be set up to oversee basic sanitation services in metropolitan regions, including the São Paulo Metropolitan Region.  We cannot predict how the shared management of these operations will be carried out in the São Paulo Metropolitan Region and other metropolitan regions we operate or what effect this may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

There are some pending cases before the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding whether the right to execute concession and program agreements in metropolitan regions belongs to the State or the municipal government.  On February 28, 2013 the Brazilian Supreme Court decided a pending case on this matter related to the State of Rio de Janeiro.  A majority of the court held that the State of Rio de Janeiro and municipal governments must set up new joint entities to oversee the planning, regulation and auditing of basic sanitation services in metropolitan regions.  On March 6, 2013, the court ruled that this decision would come into effect after a 24-month period over the State of Rio de Janeiro.  Such decision may be considered a relevant precedent on this matter and therefore similar decisions may be taken on other pending cases as well as on new cases that can be initiated.  The São Paulo metropolitan region (including the municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis), one of which new decisions on such pending or new cases may apply, accounted for 74.1% of our gross revenue from services in 2012 (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure).  We cannot predict how the shared management of these operations could be carried out in the São Paulo Metropolitan Region and other municipalities we operate or what effect it may have on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

The terms of our new agreement to provide water and sewage services in the cityCity of São Paulo could have a material adverse effect on us.

OurThe provision of water and sewage services in the cityCity of São Paulo accounted for 55.1%54.7% of our gross operating revenues from sales and services (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure) in the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

On June 23, 2010, the State and the cityCity of São Paulo entered intoexecuted an agreement in the form of a convention (convênio) with the intermediation, to which we and our consent and the consent of the ARSESP pursuant toconsented, under which they agreed to jointly manage the planning of and investment infor the basic sanitation system of the cityCity of São Paulo among other things.  This agreement established that theon a joint basis.  The principal terms of thisconvênio were as follows:

·The State and the cityCity of São Paulo would enter into anexecute a separate agreement with us, granting us exclusive rights with respect to the provision ofprovide water and sewage services in the cityCity of São Paulo.  In addition, the agreement established the role of the

·ARSESP in regulatingwould regulate and overseeingoversee our activities (includingregarding water and sewage services in the tariffs we collect) and established aCity of São Paulo, including tariffs.

·A management committee (Comitê Gestor) that willwould be responsible for planning the water and sewage services for the City and for reviewing our investment plans.  The management committee will be composedconsists of six members appointed for two yeartwo-year terms.  The State and the cityCity of São Paulo will have the right to appoint three members each.  We are permitted tomay participate in themanagement committee meetings of the management committee; however, we arebut may not afforded any voting rightsvote.

Also, on June 23, 2010,In application of theconvênio, we entered intoexecuted a formal agreementseparate contract with the State and the cityCity of São Paulo, also dated June 23, 2010, to regulate the provision of these services.  This agreement requires, among other things, (i) thatservices for the estimated investments mentionedfollowing 30 years.  The principal terms of this contract are as follows:

·The total investment stated in the agreement comply withcontract must be equal to 13% of the gross revenuerevenues from the municipalityprovision of services to the City of São Paulo, net of the taxes on revenues. The investment plan, upon its execution by us,revenues, which total approximately R$500 million per year.

16


·We must be compatible with the activities and programs included in the sanitation plan of the State, Municipality, and if necessary, of the Metropolitan region. The invest plan is not irrevocable and will be reviewed by our management committee every four years, especially the investments to be executed in the subsequent period; and (ii) that we contributetransfer 7.5% of the gross revenues from saleswe derive under theconvênio, and services we obtain from this agreement, net ofsubtract (i) COFINS and PASEP taxes, and (ii) unpaid bills of publicly owned properties in the city of São Paulo, to the Municipal Fund for Environmental Sanitation and Infrastructure (Fundo Municipal de Saneamento Ambiental e Infraestrutura),  or the São Paulo Municipal Sanitation Fund, established by Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009.  In addition,

·Our investment plan must be compatible with the agreement provides thatsanitation plans of the State, the City of São Paulo and, if necessary, the Metropolitan region.

·ARSESP will ensure that the tariffs charged (a) will adequately compensate us for the services we provide and (b) canthat tariffs may be adjusted in order to restore the original balance between each party’s obligationobligations and economic gain (equilíbrio econômico-financeiromico‑financeiro).  

We currently have an investment plan in place that reflects these obligations and addresses their compatibility with the activities and programs includedsanitation plans for 363 in which we operate, that includes the sanitation plan of the State and of the municipalityCity of São Paulo and if necessary, the plan of the metropolitan region of São Paulo. ThisMetropolitan region.  The investment plan is not irrevocable and will be reviewed by aour management committee every four years, so asparticularly with respect to ensure compliance with government policies and contractual terms. the investments to be executed in the subsequent period.

Because we were not previously required to makeinvest 13% of our gross revenues or transfer 7.5% of our gross revenues to the mandatory allocationsSão Paulo Municipal Sanitation and Infrastructure Fund as described in items (i) and (ii) above, they were not taken into account in calculating our existing tariff and its adjustment formula.  Despite the contractual provisions and the ARSESP’s role in setting and adjusting adequate tariffs, which are necessaryformula do not account for our economic and financial balance, we cannot guaranteethese requirements.  Although ARSESP is required to ensure that the tariffs we will be allowed to chargeadequately compensate us for the provisionservices we provide, and ARSESP has published Resolution No. 407 authorizing us to pass on specified charges to the municipalities and include these charges in our tariff revisions, Resolution No. 407 has not yet been implemented and the final decision concerning this has been postponed until August 2013.  If we cannot pass on these charges to our customers, our financial condition and results of water and sewage servicesoperations could be materially adversely affected.  For further information see “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to Our Business – The Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the city of São Paulo will continue to adequately compensate us. 

A decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding whether State or municipal governments have the right to execute concession and program agreements in metropolitan regions could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our provision of water and sewage services in the metropolitan regions in which we operate is governed by agreements with the relevant State authorities (other than in the city of São Paulo, where we now have an agreement with the municipal authorities as well as the State). In a lawsuit initiated by third parties that is currently before the Brazilian Supreme Court, the Court is considering whether the State or the municipal governments have the proper authority to plan and regulate basic sanitation services rendered in metropolitan regions, as well as the right to execute concession and program agreements.  If the Brazilian Supreme Court grants this authority to municipal governments, under certain circumstances, we may be required to cease our operations in certain metropolitan regions where we have agreements with the State only, to the extent that those municipalities opt to use another water and sewage service provider.  To mitigate this risk, we have commenced a process of executing agreements with both the Stateimplementation and the municipal governments of certain metropolitan regions,interpretation, and we already have such agreements regarding thecity of São Paulo.  We cannot anticipate the effects of the Brazilian Supreme Court decisiondoubts remain as to its full impact on the provision of our services in other metropolitan regions, which could have a material adverse effect on us.


We have not entered into formal agreements forindustry.  ARSESP, the provision of water and sewage services with certain ofregulator, has the municipalities we serve, including municipalities in metropolitan regions, as required byfunction to implement regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law and therefore we may not be able to enforce our rights to continue to provide services in these municipalities.

Underwithin the Basic Sanitation Law, we were required to have entered into formal agreements before December 31, 2010 with every municipality with which we did not have a formal agreement in place or with which our agreements had already expired, as is the case of certain municipalities located in the metropolitan regions where we are authorized to operate in accordance with local legislation.  If such contractual arrangements were not entered into by December 31, 2010, the informal or expired services concessions would no longer be valid.

As of the date of this annual report, of the 363 municipalities we provide water and sewage services to, we have informal or expired arrangements with 99 municipalities. These 99 concessions include municipalities located in and outside metropolitan regions, including the municipality of Santos, located in the coastal region.  Together, these 99 municipalities accounted for 23.8% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011, and 29.7% of our intangible assets as of that same date. 

We are currently negotiating with these municipalities the renewal or the formalization of the concessions through the execution of program agreements.  In order to renegotiate or formalize the agreements, we face the following problems: (i) we are still awaiting the final decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding whether the State or the municipalities have the right to enter into contractual arrangements for the provision of the basic sanitation services in the metropolitan regions (until the execution of the agreement with the city and State of São Paulo, and is in June 2010 there was no precedent for a joint management contractual arrangement between the State, the municipalitiesprocess of reviewing, implementing and us); (ii) the execution of new agreements will depend on certain acts that are beyond our control, such as the compliance by the municipalities located outside the metropolitan regions with certain legal procedures.

The Basic Sanitation Law did not define any penalty for the non-compliance with the December 31, 2010 deadline by the municipalities or for theproposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage service companies in case the deadline is not observed.  Consequently, we cannot anticipate if we are going to be subject to any penalty dueregulations, including potentially significant changes to the lacktariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of a formal agreement with some municipalities or if any eventual penalty willthe changes that are currently proposed, may have a materialan adverse effect on us.

We cannot assure you when or whether there will be changes to the conditions under which we currently provide water and sewage services to the municipalities with which we do not have formal concession agreements or are renegotiating expired agreements, or whether we will be able to continue to provide water and sewage services in any municipalities where we are unable to renew or enter into a formal concession agreement. Because we do not hold concessions or contractual rights to provide services in 99 municipalities, we may not be able to effectively enforce our right to continue to provide services therein or may face difficulties in being timely paid for the services that we provide. 

In addition, in the future, our rights in respect of these municipalities could be modified or adversely affected by Brazilian federal, state or municipal governmental actions, judicial decisions or other factors.  For further information, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—The Basic Sanitation Law” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.business. 

We are exposed to risks associatedcurrently lack formal agreements or concessions with the provision of water and sewage services.

Our industry is specifically affected by the following risks associated with the provision of water and sewage services:

§

we are subject to substantial charges imposed by state and federal government agencies that manage water resources related to the abstraction of water from, or dumping of sewage into, water bodies, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—Water Usage;”

§

in some cases, we are required to continue providing services to certain municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis that have overdue amounts owed to us and are not paying us on a regular basis and we cannot assure you of when or whether these municipalities will pay us in a timely manner. See “Item 4.B. Business Overview-Billing Procedures;” 


§

the degradation of watershed areas may affect the quantity and quality of water available to meet our customers’ demand.  See “Item 4.A History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditure Program;” 

§

our tariffs may not increase in line with increases in inflation and operating expenses, including taxes, or increase in a timely manner, which may hinder us from passing on to our customers increases in our cost structure. See “—The terms of our new agreement to provide water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo could have a material adverse effect on us”.  These constraints may also have an adverse effect on our ability to fund our capital expenditure program and financing activities, and to meet our debt service requirements.  See “Item 5.A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Tariff Increases;” 

§

we are exposed to probable increases in the frequency of extreme weather conditions in the future, which may adversely affect both the quality and quantity of waters available for abstraction, treatment, and supply. Given that our financial performance is closely linked to climate patterns, droughts could adversely affect the water supply systems, resulting in a decrease in the volume of water distributed and billed as well as in the revenue derived from water supply distribution services.  An increase in heavy rainfalls could impact water quality and regular operations of water sources, including abstraction of waters from our dams, due to increased soil erosion, silting, pollution and eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems. See “Item 5.A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Climate Change (Drought and Intense Rainfalls);” and

§

we are dependent upon energy to conduct our operations and eventual shortages or rationing of energy may prevent us from providing water and sewage services and may also cause material damage to our water and sewage systems when we resume operations. Also, we may not be able to pass on to our customers significant increases in energy tariffs. See “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company-Energy Consumption.”

The occurrence of any67 of the above may have a material adverse effect on us.

municipalities to which we provide service, and 38 of our existing concession agreements will expire between 2013 and 2034.  We may face difficulties in continuing to provide water and sewage services in thereturn for payment in these and other municipalities, we serve and we cannot assure you that these municipalitiesthey will continue to require our provision ofpurchase services underfrom us on the same terms.terms or at all.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we were a provider of water and sewage servicesprovided service to 363 municipalities.  Between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011,municipalities, of which we had entered into 30-yearheld formal 30‑year agreements with 225 of these258 municipalities (including our services agreement with the cityCity of São Paulo),.  We executed 33 of these agreements during 2012.  The 258 municipalities with which 25 were entered into in 2011.  These 225 municipalitieswe had formal agreements at year-end accounted for 65.2%69.9 % of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and 62.6%63.5% of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2011.  As2012.  Of the 67 served municipalities for which we lacked formal agreements at year-end, we were in the process of December 31, 2011, we have beenactively renegotiating 99 concession agreements that expired,with all municipalities, including the municipality of Santos.  Together, these 9967 municipalities accounted for 23.8%18.6% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and 29.7%26.7% of our intangible assets as of that same date.  Between 2013 and 2034, 38 of our existing concession agreements will expire.  These 38 concession agreements accounted for 9.4% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 8.1% of our intangible assets as of that same date.

From January 1, 2012We may not be able to 2033, 39 concessioncontinue providing service on current terms, or at all, in the municipalities for which we do not have formal agreements, will expire.  These 39 concession agreements accountedincluding the 67 for 8.6%which we are renegotiating expired agreements.  In particular, the lack of formal concessions or contractual rights in these municipalities means that we may not be able to enforce our total revenuesright to continue to provide services and we may face difficulties in being paid on a timely basis, or at all, for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 6.7% of our intangible assets as ofservices that same date. 

We cannot assure you that these municipalities will continue to require our services and enter into new concession agreements or program agreements with us.  In the event thatwe provide.  If we are successful in renegotiating our concessionthe expired agreements, or entering into programexecuting formal agreements with the municipalities whose concessionfor which we have never had agreements, expired or will expire, we cannot assure youthose agreements may not contain terms that the new concession or program agreements will have the same termsare as favorable as those under which we currently provide services to these municipalities.operate.  We cannot make any such assumption because the Basic Sanitation Law prevents us from planning, regulating and monitoring our services and it requiresmore stringent control by the municipalities or by the ARSESP.

In addition, these  The municipalities for which we do not have formal agreements may choose to assume the direct provision ofstart providing water and sewage services directly themselves, or promote amay run public bidding processtenders to select another water and sewage service provider.  Depending on theThey may set eligibility requirements tofor which we do not qualify and, if we do qualify and participate in the public bidding processes,these tenders, we may not qualifywin.  In addition, our ability to participate in somecontinue operating without formal agreements may be modified or allcancelled by federal, state or municipal governments, court decisions or other factors.

17


Any of these public bidding processes.  If we participate in these public bidding processes, we cannot assure you that we will win the bid.  In the event that these municipalities assume the direct provisionevents could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of wateroperations and sewage services or promote a public bidding process to select another water and sewage service provider, or the new terms or conditions of the concession or program agreements are less favorable to us, we may be materially and adversely affected.financial condition.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—OurOperations” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.”


In the municipalities with which we did not have formal agreements by December 31, 2012, we continued operating with municipal approval or with judicial support.

MunicipalitiesThe municipalities may under certain circumstances, terminate our concessions before their expiration and thethey expire in certain circumstances.  The indemnification payments we receive in such cases may be inadequate to recoverless than the full value of our investments.the investments we made.

The concessions we hold are subjectmunicipalities have the right to early termination provisions, which entitle municipalities to terminate our concessions prior to their expiration date under certain circumstances.  Municipalities may terminate our concessions if we fail to comply with our obligations under the relevant concession agreementcontractual or applicable law,legal obligations, or if the municipality determines through anin expropriation proceeding,proceedings that terminating ourearly termination of the concession prior to its expiration date is in the public interest.  If anya municipality terminates our concession, before the expiration date, we are entitled to be indemnified for the unamortized portion of our investments, butinvestments. 

The Basic Sanitation Law provides that on early termination of a concession, the indemnification may not be sufficient for usentity that provides sanitation services should carry out a valuation of the assets that relate to recover the full valueservices we provide, in order to calculate the unamortized portion of our investments.  Further, underThis valuation uses the termscriteria defined in the service contract or, in the absence of a contract, is based on customary practice with respect to the services for the preceding 20 years.  The resulting indemnification payment may be less than the remaining value of the Constitution ofinvestments we made. 

In addition, the State of São Paulo State constitution permits the municipalities mayto pay the indemnificationus this compensation in installments over a term of 25 years.  However, theReceiving compensation over this extended period after termination of a significant concession would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.  The Brazilian Supreme Court stayedsuspended this deferred payment mechanism in a 1997 decision, but we cannot assure you that the applicationmechanism will not be reinstated.  This case is still awaiting a final decision, but on March 15, 2004 the Attorney General issued an opinion that this payment method is unconstitutional.  The Basic Sanitation Law reduced the maximum time period for payment of thisindemnification in such cases to four years.  This provision applies to concession agreements entered into prior to the enactment of the ConstitutionBasic Sanitation Law only to the extent that the concession agreement does not contain a contractual indemnification provision, or we have not otherwise entered into an agreement with the municipality with regard to such early termination.  These provisions have not yet been tested by the courts and we are therefore unable to predict the effect of the StateBasic Sanitation Law on our rights to indemnification for the early termination of São Paulo in 1997, and the decision remains valid until final judgment.any particular concession.

In 1997, the municipality of Santos enacted a law expropriatingin order to repossess our water and sewage systems in Santos.  There are pending legal proceedings concerningWe have adopted the expropriation carried out bynecessary judicial measures to contest this municipality.  Weand continue to provide water and sewageoperate our services to the cityin Santos as of Santos.December 31, 2012.

In 1995, the municipality of Diadema terminated theits concession agreement that had been entered into with us prior to the expiration of the concession agreement.  As a result, we filed a lawsuitus.  We commenced legal proceedings against the municipality, of Diadema which we eventuallywere settled in 1996.  The1996, but the municipality of Diadema did not comply with thisthe terms of the settlement.  In December 2008, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with the State of São Paulo, the municipality of Diadema and the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources, formerlypreviously known as the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Energy (Secretaria de Saneamento e Energia do Estado de São Paulo).  ThisUnder this memorandum establishes our agreementof understanding the parties agreed to conclude negotiations and settle all outstanding amounts, and we agreed to stay the collection proceedings we had filed against the municipality of Diadema.municipality.  In 2011 we and the municipality of Diadema agreed with us to develop a shared infrastructure for the provision of water and sewage services through a mixed-capitalmixed capital company to be called Companhia de Agua e Esgoto de Diadema, or CAED, and we cannot predict when this company will begin operations.  TheCAED.  According to the agreement, the amount owed to us by Diadema would be repaid through the issuance of shares in CAED.  However, CAED has not yet been established, and we cannot predict whether or when it will be created or begin operations.  Feasibility studies have been completed and indicate that CAED would have a viable business, but the Diadema municipality would be returnedmunicipalauthorities have started new negotiations to us through our capital participation inamend the legislation that provided for the setting up of CAED.  We can give no assurance that we will recover our investmentsthe amount owed to us by Diadema, whether through an investment in such company.CAED or otherwise.

18


For further information on these lawsuits,proceedings, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We cannot assure you that otherOther municipalities will notmay seek to terminate their concession agreements before the contractual expiration date.  The early termination of concession agreements by municipalities, our inability toIf this occurs and we do not receive adequate indemnification for theour investments, we made, or the payment of indemnification dueis paid over an extended period, we may suffer material harm to our financial position.

We may face difficulties in collecting overdue amounts owed to us by municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis and municipal government entities.

As of December 31, 2012, our total accounts receivable was R$4,098.0 million.  Of this amount, certain municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis owed us R$1,677.7 million, and certain municipal government entities owed us R$792.1 million.  Of the total amount owed by municipalities, R$174.3 million was overdue by between 30 and 360 days and R$1,453.3 million was overdue by over a long period, may have a material adverse effect on us.360 days.

The Basic Sanitation Law has established provisions governing the indemnification ofBrazilian courts are entitled to obligate us to continue to supply water and sewage service providers in case of early termination of concession agreements by a municipality and reduced the term over which indemnification must be paid to four years.  These provisions are also applicable to concession agreements entered into prior to the enactment of the Basic Sanitation Law, as long as these concession agreements do not have a contractual indemnification provision in case of early termination ormunicipalities, even when we have not otherwise entered into an agreementreceived payments due to us.  We have no way of ensuring that negotiations with these municipalities or legal action taken against the municipalitymunicipalities will result in payments being made.  Some entities associated with regardmunicipal governments for which we provide services also do not make regular payments.  We cannot guarantee if or when these entities will make payments on a regular basis or pay the amounts owed to such early termination.  Nevertheless,us.  If the municipalities and related entities do not pay the amounts owed to us, we cannot anticipate the effects of the Basic Sanitation Law on the amount of, and enforceability of the rightmay suffer material harm to indemnification and how Brazilian courts will enforce the provisions of the Basic Sanitation Law.our financial position. 

Any failure to obtain new financing may adversely affect our ability to continue our capital expenditure program.

Our capital expenditure program will require substantial liquidity and capital resources of approximately R$7.99.9 billion in the period from 2013 through 2016.  In 2012 through 2015.  Wewe recorded R$2.42.5 billion ofin capital expenditure in 2011 in connection with our capital expenditure program.expenditures.

We have funded these capital expenditures with cash generated by our operations as well as borrowings in the past,Brazilianreais and foreign currencies, and we planintend to continue to fund our capital expenditures from these expenditures with funds generated by operations and domestic and foreign currency borrowings on acceptable terms.sources.  A significant portion of our financing needs havehas been funded by lenders controlledprovided by the Brazilian federal government.public government banks.  We also benefit fromhave obtained long‑term financing at attractive interest rates from multilateral agencies and domestic and international governmental development banks.  If the Brazilian government changes its policies regarding the financing of water and sewage services, or if we fail to obtain long‑term financing at attractive interest rates from domestic and international multilateral agencies and development banks atattractive interest rates.  Changes in the policies of the federal government regarding the financing of water and sewage services, or our failure to continue to benefit from long-term financing from domestic and international multilateral agencies and development banks at attractive interest ratesfuture, we may impair our abilitynot be able to meet our obligations or finance our capital expenditure program, which could have a material adverse effect on us.our business and financial condition.


As a general rule,Governmental agencies, institutional lenders and multilateral agencies constitute our main sources of financing in addition to cash generated by our operations and issuances of debt securities in the domestic and international capital markets.  Brazilian financial institutions and other institutions authorizedare legally limited up to provide credit by the Central Bank may onlya certain percentage of their shareholder’s equity to provide loans to public sector entities, such as us, up to a certain percentage of the entity’s shareholders’ equity.  Because of these limitations on our ability to obtain credit from domestic financial institutions, our options for raising funds, other than the cash generated by our operations, consist mainly of borrowing from governmental agencies, national and international financial institutions or multilateral agencies and issuing debt securities in both the domestic and international capital markets.us.  These legal limitations could adversely affect our ability to continue our capital expenditure program.

We are also subject toOur debt includes financial covenants limiting our ability to incur additionalthat impose indebtedness limits on us, which could have a material adverse effect on us.  For further information on these covenants, see “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Sources—Indebtedness Financing—Financial Covenants.”  Our failure to comply with these covenants could seriously impair our ability to finance our capital expenditure program, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

19


We are subject to cost increases to complyCompliance with environmental law requirementslaws and potential environmental liability thatpayments could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our facilitiesWe are subject to extensive Brazilian federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These laws and regulations establishset water potability standards for consumption and limit or prohibit emissionsthe discharge or spillsspillage of effluents,effluent produced in our operations, particularly raw sewage.  We occasionally suffer accidents such as raw sewage, producedleakages or breaks in connection with our operations.pipes that could lead to liability for damages under environmental law.  We could be subject to civil public actions andvarious types of criminal, administrative and other civil proceedings for non-compliancenon‑compliance with environmental laws and regulations, which could expose us to administrative and civil penalties and criminal sanctions, such as fines, closure orders and significant indemnification obligations.  SinceThe scope and enforcement of environmental laws and their enforcement by Brazilian authoritiesin Brazil are becoming more stringent, and our capital expenditures and expenses for environmental compliance costs may increase substantially.  Expenditures required for compliance withsubstantially as a result.  These expenses may lead us to reduce expenditure on strategic investments, which could harm our business.  In addition, Brazilian courts are enforcing environmental laws and regulationsmore stringently than in the past, which may result in reductions in other strategic investmentsfines or liability for damages that are significantly higher than those we have planned, which could negatively affect us.  In addition, due to more stringent enforcement of environmental laws by Brazilian courts, we may be required to pay substantial fines and indemnifications in amounts that may vary widely from those currently anticipated.anticipate.  We are presently a party to various environmental proceedings that could have a numbermaterial adverse impact on us, including civil processes and investigations relating to the release of civil public actionsuntreated sewage into waterways and administrative proceedings related to environmental matters, with regard to which we are unable to calculate our estimated amountthe disposal of potential liability.  sludge generated by treatment plants.Any unfavorable judgment in relation to these lawsuits and proceedings, or any material unforeseen environmental liabilities, may have a material adverse effect on us.  For further information on these lawsuits,proceedings, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—ConsolidatedInformation-Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—LegalInformation-Legal Proceedings.”  For further information on investments in environmental programs, see “Item 4.A - Main Projects of our Capital Expenditure Program,” “Item 4.B – Busniess Overview – Sewage Treatment and Disposal ,” “Item 4.B – Business Overview - Environmental Matters” and “Item 4.B – Business Overview - Environmental Regulation.”

The enactment of newNew laws and regulations relating to climate change and changes in existing regulation, as well as the physical effects of climate change, may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

As newCurrent federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating toon climate change including carbon controls, become applicableestablish global goals, which we intend to meet  concerning greenhouse gas emissions and this may require us and as existing environmental regulations relating to climate change become more stringent, it is possible thatincrease our capital expenditure for compliance with these laws and regulations will increase substantiallyinvestments in the future.  If we increase capital expenditureorder to comply with these laws and regulations,laws. Currently, however, if we increase our capital expenditures for this purpose, we may be required to reduce expenditureexpenditures on other strategic investments.

In addition, if climate change leadsmay lead to significant physical effects,increases in extreme weather events such as variations in the intensity of droughts andor torrential rain, which may affect our ability to deliver our services may be affected and we may be required, among other things, to:  (i) make significant investmentsrequire us to take action such as:

·investing in seeking new water sources located further from major consumer centers and (ii) make significant investmentscenters;

·investing in new technologies.technologies;

·adopting water conservation practices and implementing alternative demand management systems such as economic mechanisms or educational programs; and

·increasing our reserve capacity.

We have not adopted any method for calculatingattempted to evaluate the investments that wouldmay be necessary in the eventas a result of a significant physical effect from climate change.  Any substantialIt may require us to increase in expenditure related to climate change,expenditures, whether for compliance with changes in environmental regulations or for preventing or remedying the physical effects of climate change,change.  We may have a material adverse effect on us.be required to adopt new standards aimed at improving energy efficiency and minimizing emissions of greenhouse gases when we renew our operating systems licenses or seek to obtain licenses for new ventures.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Environmental Matters—Climate Change Regulations:  Reduction of Greenhouse Gases (GHG).”

An increase in sea levels could cause additional intrusion of salt water in the river estuaries where we collect water for treatment, which could generate problems in our treatment, water supply and sanitation systems in coastal areas, including physical damage to facilities and networks.  Additionally, increases in air temperature could affect demand for water.  Climate change may also reduce water levels in the reservoirs that power hydroelectric plants in Brazil, which may cause energy shortages and increase electricity prices, which may adversely affect our costs and operations.

20


We cannot predict all of the effects of climate change. We have not provisioned any funds for climate change events as current technology and  contrasting scientific understandings of climate change make it difficult to predict potential expenses and liabilities.  We may need to make substantial new expenditures, either to comply with new environmental regulations linked to climate change or to prevent or correct the physical effects of climate change, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. 

We are exposed to risks associated with the provision of water and sewage services.

Our industry is affected by the following additional risks relating to the provision of water and sewage services:

·The state and federal government agencies that manage water resources impose substantial charges for the abstraction of water from bodies of water and the discharge of sewage.  We may not be able to pass these charges on to our customers.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—Water Usage.”

·The degradation of watershed areas may affect the quantity and quality of water available to meet demand from our customers.  See “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditure Program” and “—Main Projects of Our Capital Expenditure Program.”

·In addition to the risks discussed under “—The terms of our new agreement to provide water and sewage services in the City of São Paulo could have a material adverse effect on us,” we may not be able to increase our tariffs on a timely basis, or at all, in order to pass on increases in inflation or operating expenses, including taxes, to our customers.  These constraints may have an adverse effect on our ability to fund our capital expenditure program and financing activities, and to meet our debt service requirements.  See “Item 5.A.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Tariff Increases.”

·In addition to the risks discussed under “— New laws and regulations relating to climate change and changes in existing regulation, as well as the physical effects of climate change, may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on us,”we are exposed to various weather-related risks, since our financial performance is closely linked to climate patterns.  The expected increase in the frequency of extreme weather conditions in the future may adversely affect both the quality and quantity of waters available for abstraction, treatment, and supply.  Droughts could adversely affect the water supply systems, resulting in a decrease in the volume of water distributed and billed as well as in the revenue derived from water supply services.  An increase in heavy rainfall could impact water quality and the regular operation of water sources, including abstraction of waters from our dams, due to increased soil erosion, silting, pollution and eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems.  See “Item 5.A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Climate Change (Drought and Intense Rainfalls).”

·We are dependent upon energy supplies to conduct our business.  Any shortages or rationing of energy may prevent us from providing water and sewage services, and may also cause material damage to our water and sewage systems when we resume operations.  Also, we may not be able to pass on any significant increases in energy tariffs to our customers.  See “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company‑Energy Consumption.”

Any of the above may have a material adverse effect on us.

Any substantial monetary judgment against us in legal proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us.


We are a party to a number of legal proceedings involving significant monetary claims.  These legal proceedings include, among others, civil, environmental, tax, labor, condemnationcriminal and other proceedings.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the total value of all outstanding claims against us was R$24,152.036,866.9 million (net of R$133.1330.2 million in court deposits).  A substantial monetary judgment against us in one or more of these legal proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us.  Based on advice from our legal counsel, wefinancial condition.  We have provisioned a total aggregate amount of R$1,571.8 1,189.2 million (net of court deposits) as of December 31, 20112012 to cover probable losses related to legal proceedings.  This provision does not cover all legal proceedings involving monetary claims filed against us and itmay be insufficient to cover our liabilities related to these claims. 

Any unfavorable judgment in relation to these proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us.  For more information, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

21


Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and ADSs

We may not always be in a position to pay dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity and ADSs.

Depending on our future results, our shareholders may not receive dividends or interest on own capital if we do not generate a profit.  Despite the requirement to distribute a minimum of 25% of our annual net income to shareholders, our future financial position may not permit us to distribute dividends or pay interest on own capital.

The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell our common shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire.

Investing in securities that trade infrom emerging markets such as Brazil often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in major securities markets, and these investments are often considered to be more speculative in nature.  The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets.  Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the common shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited.  There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities market than in major securities markets.  The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented approximately 53.1%51.8% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA as of December 31, 2011.2012.  The top ten stocks in terms of trading volume accounted for approximately 50.4%43.0%, 48.8%47.2% and 47.0%48.8% of all shares traded on the BM&FBOVESPA in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, respectively.

Investors who exchange ADSs for common shares may lose their ability to remit foreign currency abroad and to obtain Brazilian tax advantages.

The Brazilian custodian for the common shares underlying our ADSs must obtain a certificate of registration from the Central Bank in order to be entitled to remit U.S. dollars abroad for payments of dividends and other distributions relating to our common shares or upon the dispositionsales of our common shares.  If an ADR holder decides to exchange ADSs for the underlying common shares, thisthe holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s certificate of registration for five business days from the date of exchange.  After that period, the holder may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the dispositionsale of our common shares, or distributions relating to our common shares, unless he or she obtains his or her own certificate of registration or registerregisters under Resolution No. 2,689, dated January 26, 2000, of the CMN, which entitles registered foreign investors to buy and sell on thea Brazilian stock exchanges.exchange.  If the holder does not obtain a certificate of registration or register under Resolution No. 2,689, thisthe holder will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to our common shares.

If a holder attempts to obtain his or her own certificate of registration, the holder may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay his or her ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our common shares or the return of his or her capital in a timely manner.  We cannot assure you that theThe custodian’s certificate of registration or any foreign capital registration obtained by a holder may not be affected by future legislative changes, or thatand additional restrictions applicable to the holder, the disposition of the underlying common shares or the repatriation of the proceeds fromof disposition will notmay be imposed in the future.

A holder of common shares or ADSs may face difficulties in protecting his or her interests as a shareholder because we are a Brazilian mixed capital company.

We are a mixed capital company (sociedade de economia mista) organized under the laws of Brazil, and all of our directors and officers and our controlling shareholder reside in Brazil.  All of our assets and those of these other persons are located in Brazil.  As a result, it may not be possible for a holder to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil or to enforce against us or these other persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil.  Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certainrequirements are met, a holder may face difficultiesmore difficulty in protecting his or her interests in the case of actions by our directors, officers or our controlling shareholderthan would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a state or other jurisdiction of the United States.  In addition, under Brazilian law, none of our assets which are essential to our ability to render public services are subject to seizure or attachment.  Furthermore, the execution of a judgment against our controlling shareholder may be delayed, as payment ofsince the State may only be able to pay a judgment must be made pursuant to the State’sif it is provided for in its budget in a subsequent fiscal year.  None of the public property of our controlling shareholder is subject toavailable for seizure or attachment, either prior to or after judgment.

22



 

Mandatory arbitration provisions in our bylaws may limit the ability of a holder of our ADSs to enforce liability under U.S. securities laws.

Under our bylaws, any disputes among us, our shareholders and our management with respect to the application ofNovo Mercado rules, Brazilian Corporate Law and the application of the rules and regulations regarding Brazilian capital markets regulations will be resolved by arbitration conducted pursuant to the BM&FBOVESPA Arbitration Rules in the Market Arbitration Chamber.  Any disputes among shareholders, including ADR holders, and any disputes between us and our shareholders, including ADR holders, will also be submitted to arbitration.  As a result, a court in the United States might require that a claim brought by an ADR holder predicated upon the U.S. securities laws be submitted to arbitration in accordance with our bylaws.  In that event, a purchaser of ADSs would be effectively precluded from pursuing remedies under the U.S. securities laws in the U.S. courts.

A holder of our common shares and ADSs might be unable to exercise preemptive rights and tag-alongtag‑along rights with respect to the common shares.

U.S. holders of common shares and ADSs may not be able to exercise the preemptive rights and tag-alongtag‑along rights relating to common shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available.  We are not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to our common shares relating to these rights, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement.  Unless we file a registration statement or an exemption from registration is available, an ADR holder may receive only the net proceeds from the sale of his or her preemptive rights and tag‑along rights or, if these rights cannot be sold, they will lapse and the ADR holder will receive no value for them.

A holder of our ADSs may find it more difficult than a holder of our common shares to exercise his or her voting rights at our shareholders’ meetings.

Holders may exercise voting rights with respect to the common shares represented by our ADSsADRs only in accordance with the deposit agreement relating to our ADSs.  There are no provisions underADRs.  Neither Brazilian law or undernor our bylaws that limit the exercise by ADR holders of their voting rights through the depositary with respect to the underlying common shares.  However, there are practical limitations upon the ability of ADR holders to exercise their voting rights duewith respect to the underlying common shares through the depositary.  However, the additional procedural steps involved in communicating with these holders.ADR holders impose practical limitations on the exercise of voting rights.  For example, our common shareholders will receive notice of shareholders’ meetings through publication of a notice in an official government publication in Brazil and will be able to exercise their voting rights by either attending the meeting in person or voting by proxy.  ADR holders, by comparison, will not receive notice directly from us.  Instead,us; instead, in accordance with the deposit agreement, we will provide the notice to the depositary, which will, in turn as soon as practicable thereafterwill mail to ADR holders the notice of the meeting andto ADR holders as soon as practicable after publication, along with a statement as to the manner in which instructionsholders may be given by holders,give voting instructions, but only if we request the depositary to do so.  To exercise their voting rights, ADR holders must then instructgive instructions to the depositary as to voting the common shares represented by their ADSs.depositary.  Due to these procedural steps, involving the depositary, the process for exercising voting rights may take longer for ADR holders than for holders of common shares.  The deposit agreement provides that if the depositary does not receive any instructions from a holder of ADRs, the ADR holder may be deemed to have given a discretionary proxy to a person designated by our company and the underlying shares may be voted by such person.  However, we chose not to designate any person to exercise these deemed proxy rights with respect to the annual general meeting held to approve our financial statements for 2012, and ADSs for which the depositary fails to receive timelyno specific voting instructions willwere received by the Depositary were therefore not be voted at anythat meeting.

23


ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A.History and Development of the Company

Overview

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – SABESP is a mixed capital company (sociedade de economia mista) with limited liability. We were incorporated on September 6, 1973 under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil.  We are registered atwith the Commercial Registry of the State of São Paulo (Junta Comercial do Estado de São Paulo) under registration number NIRE 35300016831.  Our principal executive offices are located at Rua Costa Carvalho, 300, 05429-90005429‑900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.  Our telephone number is +(55)+55 11 3388‑8000.  Our agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation System, with offices at 818 West Seventh Street – Team 1, Los Angeles, CA 90017.  We areallowed to operate, in a subsidiary form, in other Brazilian locations and abroad.  See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.”


We believe we are one of the largest water and sewage service providers in the world (based on the number of customers in 2011),2012, according to the 13th14th edition of thePinsent Masons Water Yearbook (2011-2012) 2012-2013).  We operate water and sewage systems in the State of São Paulo, in which includes the city of São Paulo, Brazil’s largest city, is located.city.  According to the IBGE, the State of São Paulo is Brazil’s most populous state and the state with the highest gross domestic product, or GDP, in Brazil.  For the year ended December 31, 2011, from our total revenues2012, we had agenerated consolidated net revenue of R$9,941.6 million10,754.4 and a consolidated net income of R$1,223.4 million.1,911.9.  Our total consolidated assets wasamounted to R$25,215.0 million26,675.8 and our total shareholders’ equity wasamounted to R$10,545.9 million11,715.6 as of December 31, 2011.2012.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we provided water and sewage services to a broad range of residential, commercial, industrial and governmental customers in 363 of the 645 municipalities in the State of São Paulo, including the city of São Paulo.  Substantially all of our concessions or program agreements have 30-year30‑year terms.  99At year-end 2012 we lacked formal agreements for 67 of these concessions have expired andthe municipalities we serve, each of which we are currently being renegotiated.in the process of actively renegotiating, including in the municipality of Santos.  From January 1, 20122013 through 2033, 392034, 38 further concessions will expire, whichand we will seek to replace them with program agreements.

We also supply water on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and to the municipality of Sumaré (with a total estimated urban population of approximately 3.7 million), in which we do not operate water distribution systems.  Withinsystems (together covering a total estimated urban population of approximately 3.5 million).  Five of these municipalities five of themalso utilize our sewage treatment services.  For the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the São Paulo metropolitan region (including the municipalities to which we provide water on a wholesale basis) and the Regional Systems accounted for 73.9% and 26.1%74.1% of our gross operating revenue from sales and services (excludingrevenues(excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure), respectively.while the Regional Systems accounted for 25.9%.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we provided water services through 7.57.7 million water connections to approximately 23.924.2 million people, representing approximately 59.0%59% of the urban population of the State of São Paulo, and effectively had a water coverage ratio of approximately 100%99% in respect of all regions.  As of that date, we provided sewage services through 5.96.1 million sewage connections to approximately 20.521.0 million people and effectively had aan effective sewage coverage ratio of 82.0%83%.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we operated through 66,389using 67,647 kilometers of water pipes and mains and through 45,07345,778 kilometers of sewer lines.

We also provide water and/or sewage services to four other municipalities through special purpose companies.  In addition, we renderprovide consulting services related toregarding the rational use of water and commercial and operational management in Panama and Honduras through a partnership with Latin Consult.  In addition we recently set up two new activities in partnership with other companies:  Aquapolo Ambiental S.A., a joint venture with a private sanitation services operator, which commenced operations in the second half of 2012 and operates the largest water recycling facility in the southern hemisphere, supplying up to 1,000 liters per second to industries in the Capuava petrochemical cluster in the São Paulo metropolitan region; and Attend Ambiental, a joint venture with Estre Ambiental S.A., which is constructing a pre-treatment and processing plant for non-domestic effluent in the São Paulo metropolitan region that is expected to commence operations in the second half of 2013.

The State of São Paulo, our controlling shareholder, is required by law to own at least 50% plus one of our common shares.  As of April 23, 2011,May 8, 2013, the State owned 50.3% of our outstanding common shares.  As a mixed capital company, we are an integral part of the State governmental structure.  Our strategy and major policy decisions are formulated in conjunction with the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources as part of the State’s overallstrategic planning for the State.planning.  The majority of the members of our board of directors and our board of executive officers are nominated by the State government.

24


In addition, our capital expenditure budget is subject to approval by the State legislature and is approved in conjunction with the budget of the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources as a whole.  Our consolidated financial statements and accounting records are subject to review by the State Accounts Tribunal (Tribunal de Contas), as are all accounts of the State.

Our Strengths

We believe that our strong business position and future prospects relate toderive from the following strengths:

Well-establishedWell‑established business with significant size, scale and know-howknow‑how to operate in complex urban settings.  We believe we are one of the largest water and sewage service providers in the world.  We provide water services directly to approximately 23.924.2 million people and supply water on a wholesale basis to an additional urban population of 3.7approximately 3.5 million people.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we effectively had aan effective water coverage ratio of approximately 100%99% in respect of all regions in which we operate.  We also provide sewage services directly to approximately 20.521.0 million people, achieving aan effective sewage coverage ratio of 82.0%83% in respect of all regions in which we operate as of December 31, 2011.2012.  During the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, our net revenue from sales and services increased by 7.7% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 (includingrevenuesoperating revenues (including revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure). increased by 8.2% as compared to 2011.  Our significant size and scale have required us to operate in complex urban settings such asfavelas(shantytowns) and environments without urban planning, which has enabled us to develop skills to operateskill in operating in adverse conditions, and have well-trainedwell‑trained personnel and a specialized structure that we believe our competitors lack.


Operations in Brazil’s most populous and wealthy state.  The State of São Paulo, part ofwhich is located in the most developed and economically active region of Brazil, is the most populous state in Brazil, with an estimated total population of 43.043.9 million as of December 31, 2011.2012.  The city of São Paulo had an estimated total population of 11.0 million as of thatthe same date, with 20.4 million inhabitants inwhile the São Paulo metropolitan region.region had a total population of 20.8 million.  Based on its GDP, the State of São Paulo is the wealthiest state and largest economy in Brazil.  The GDP of the State of São Paulo was approximately R$1.11.2 trillion in 2009,2010, representing approximately 33% of Brazil’s total GDP.  The State of São Paulo generates more revenue from water and sewage services than any other Brazilian state.

Strong Contract Log.  Base of Contracted BusinessFrom.  Of the 363 municipalities we serve, we have executed 30‑year agreements with 258 of the municipalities in the last fivesix years, we have executed 30-year agreements with 225 of them, including anthe agreement with the municipalityCity of São Paulo, entered intowhich we executed in June 2010.  As ofFor the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the income from those 225the 258 municipalities inwith which we have long-termformal long‑term contracts accounted for 65.2%69.9% of our revenues.gross operating revenues (including revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure).

Access to low-costlow‑cost and diverse sources of financing.  Our strong cash flow generation from operations and our role as an essential public service provider places us in a privileged position in our industry to obtain low cost, long-termlong‑term financing from Brazilian public banks, and domestic and international multilateral agencies and development banks.  In addition, we areWe do not dependent upondepend on a limited number of sources of financing.  We benefit fromfinancing, but instead have access to various funding alternatives available in the Brazilian and international markets forto fund our working capital needs and our capital expenditure programs.

Strong corporate governance practices.  In 2002, we joined theNovo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA, which is the listing segment in Brazil with the highest corporate governance requirements.  As a result, we are committed to maintaining certain additional corporate governance practicesstandards that are not otherwise required by Brazilian law, ensuring additionalwhich provides heightened protection to our shareholders rights and enhancingenhances the quality of information we disclose to the market.  On December 1, 2007, we became part of the BM&FBOVESPA Corporate Sustainability Index, or ISE, which reflects our high degree of commitment to sustainable environmental and social practices.  Commencing February 2013, our shares have also been included in the Dow Jones Sustainability™ Emerging Markets Index.

High quality operations. We believe that we adhere to high standards of service and utilizeemploy the best available technology in the sanitation business to control the quality of the water captured, producedwe abstract, process and distributed.distribute.  All of our water quality control laboratories operate in accordance with the ABNT NBR ISO 9001 which followsstandard, the highest international water quality standards.standard.  In addition to our central laboratory, 1112 of our regional laboratories areaccredited by the National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality, or INMETRO, and comply with the ABNT NBR ISO IEC 17025 standard, thereby assuring the quality and accuracy of our test results, according to ABNT NBR ISO IEC 17025.results.  Moreover, our laboratories and field teams use the latest equipment to detect substances controlled by regulations and have highly trained teams to handle contingencies and customer complaints.  We believe our technology enhances the efficiency and quality of our operations.  As of December 31, 2011, 50 of our sewage treatment facilities had obtained the ISO 14001 certification.

25


Our Strategy

Our mission is to provide water and sewage services, contributing to the improvement of theimprovements in quality of life and of the environment.  To this end, our strategic objectives are based upon the guiding principles of growth, quality, universalization of sanitation services and social, economic and environmental sustainability, while focusing on reaching excellence on costumerin customer service.  WeOur strategic objectives also base our strategic objectivesfocus on our political and institutional relationships as well as on our commitment to the market to increase shareholder value.  We seek to implement these guiding principles through the following strategies:

Continue to seek growth while improving our financial results by reducing operating costs, increasing productivity and profitability and prudently managing our levels of indebtedness.  We aim to apply our principles of financial growth and sustainability to each business unit, assigning goals and setting clear responsibilities to each unit so as to reach betterstrengthen our financial results.  To achieve this goal, we intend to use our best efforts to reduce operating costs and increase productivity and profitability.  We plan to improve the management of our assets, as well as to continue to reduce our total operating expenses by automating some of our facilities, streamlining operational processes, implementing integrated planning and further investing in internal technological research and development.  We also plan to continue our efforts to improve our collection of overdue accounts receivable from municipalities to which we provide services, from the State and from other governmental entities, including by exploring opportunities to offset these outstanding debts against certain possessory or property rights over utilities relating to water and sewage systems.  We intend to continue to fund our working capital needs and estimated capital expenditure programs with diversified sources of financing, such as domestic and international development banks andmultilateral agencies.  We will continue to seek market opportunities for low-costlow‑cost financing and restructuring of our indebtedness if and when advantageous and appropriate.


Improve operating efficiency and reduce water lossesloss.  We seek to reduce both physical water losses,loss, which resultresults mainly from leakage, and non-physicalleakage; non‑physical water losses,loss, which resultresults primarily from the inaccuracy of ourinaccurate water meters installed at our customers’ premises and at our water treatment facilities,facilities; and from clandestine and illegal water use.  In order to achieve more consistent long-termlong‑term results, we have developed a comprehensive 11-year12 year program to reduce our water loss rate.  The first threefour years of the program from 2009 to 2011 was2012 were funded by the BNDES.  During 2012From 2013 to 2016 the program is being alsowill be funded by a loan granted by the government of Japan through the Japan International Cooperation Agency, or JICA.  The program’s focus isprogram focuses on the renewal ofrenewing our water distribution infrastructure and the improvement ofimproving maintenance and control services as a means of reducing physical water losses.loss.  We are also seeking to reduce physical water lossesloss by creating smaller water supply districts through the construction of district metering areas, or DMAs, thatwhich reduce the system’ssystem pressure and pipe bursts, allowingand allow leaks to be detected and repaired more efficiently.  The program also seeks to reduce non-physicalnon‑physical water lossesloss by upgrading and replacing inaccurate water meters and through inspections of non-authorizednon‑authorized water consumption in water service connections.

Ensure the quality and availability of our services in our existing service area.  Our goal is to maintain an effective water coverage ratio of around 100%, coupled with a high standard of quality and availability, and meet the expected population growth by adding 1.3 million water connections from 2012 to 2019.between 2013 and 2020.  We also intend to increase our sewage coverage ratio to 95% by 20192020 by adding 1.81.9 million sewage connections.  In addition, we are also developing short, medium and long‑term marketing strategies, such as client segmentation and tailor‑made solutions for each typedifferent types of client,clients, which we believe will help us increase our customer base.  We also seek to improve our costumercustomer support strategies by modernizing our telephone and internet-based costumerinternet‑based customer support and to continuously measure the level of satisfaction of our clients.

Maintain and continue to expand our existing service areas.  We intend to maintain and expand our operating base through the execution ofby executing new agreements.  To this end, we are actively seeking to develop closer relationships with the municipal governments that we currently serve in order to increase customer loyalty and thereby renew all or substantially all our expiring concession agreements.agreements as they expire.  In June 2010, we entered into ana 30‑year agreement with the State and city of São Paulo with a 30-year term for the provision of water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo, which in theyear ended December 31, 20112012 accounted for 55.1%54.7% of our gross operating revenues from sales and services (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure).  Between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011,2012, we entered into 225258 30‑year agreements with 30-year terms with municipalities (including our services agreement with the city of São Paulo), of which 2533 were entered into in 2011.2012.  These 2533 municipalities accounted for 2.9%4.3% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and 3.3%4.2% of our intangible assets as of thatthe same date.  As of December 31, 2011, 992012, 67 of our concessions had expired and are currently being renegotiated.  These 9967 municipalities accounted for 23.8%18.6% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and 29.7%26.7% of our intangible assets as of thatthe same date.  From January 1, 20122013 through 2033, 392034, 38 concession agreements, accounting for 8.6%9.4% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and 6.7%8.1% of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2011the same date, will expire.

26


We have also developed a platform to offer uniquespecialized services relating toin the field of sustainability, environmental preservation and water resource management to our large industrial, commercial and residential customers in order to encourage these customers to continue to use our water services.  We also intend to continue to expand our sewage services.  A significant portion of our capital expenditure program, ofrepresenting approximately R$7.99.9 billion between 20122013 and 2015,2016, is designed to achieve this goal.  We also regularly explore the possibility of executing agreements for the provision of water and sewage services in municipalities ofin the State of São Paulo in which we currently have no operations or to which we currently supply water and provide sewage treatment solely on a wholesale basis, representingwhich together represent a total population of approximately 17 million.  We evaluate possible expansion opportunities in terms of proximity to our existing service areas to maximize return on investment and improve our financial performance.  We also intend to study and take advantage of opportunities in other Brazilian states and in other countries to expand our services and increase our market share.

Expand our water and sewage services.  We had aan effective sewage coverage ratio of 82.0%83% as of December 31, 2011,2012 and we plan to increase our sewage coveragethis ratio to 95% by 2019,2020 by adding over 1.81.9 million sewage connections.  In addition, there are municipalities in the State of São Paulo representing an aggregatea total population of approximately 17 million to which we currently do not provide water or sewage services, or to which we currently supply water solely on a wholesale basis.  Our strong presence in the State and experience in providing water and sewage services places us in a privileged position to expand our sewage services to these additional municipalities in which we provide only water servicesand our water and sewage services to municipalities in which we do not yet operate, in both the State of São Paulo, and also inas well as to other Brazilian states inBrazil and abroad.  Further, we seek to deepen our relationships with strategic clients that consume high volumes of water (more than 500 cubic meters per month) by applying special tariffs forto these clients.


Seek selective opportunities to expand our businessIn 2007, a change in our bylawsSince 2008 we have expanded the scope of our corporate purpose to includeinto various activities complementary tothat complement our water and sewage services, such as urban rainwater management and drainage services, urban cleaning services and solid waste management services.  Since thenFor example:

·We have cooperation agreements to exchange technology with six regional basic sanitation companies in Brazil, as well as with international providers such as Mekorot National Water Company of Israel, Sociedade General Aguas de Barcelona S/A – Agbar of Spain, Instituto Costarricence de Acueductos y Alcantarillados of Costa Rica,  Empresa Pública de Medellin of Colombian and Agua y Saneamientos Argentinos – AYSA of Argentina, which will allow us to exchange know‑how and identify future opportunities.

·We have executed memoranda of understanding with three municipalities to study the possibility of operating landfills, for which we have:are currently carrying out feasibility studies.

§executed cooperation agreements to exchange technology with six regional basic sanitation companies in Brazil, as well as with international businesses such as Mekorot National Water Company, an Israeli company, Sociedade General Aguas de Barcelona S/A – Agbar, a Spanish company, Instituto Costarricence de Acueductos y Alcantarillados, a Costa Rican company,  Empresa Pública de Medellin, a Colombian municipal multi-utilities company and Agua y Saneamientos Argentinos - AYSA, an Argentine company, which will allow us to exchange know-how and learn about future opportunities;
§executed memoranda of understanding with three municipalities to study the possibility of operating landfills;
§created four special purpose companies (SESAMM – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S/A; Águas de Castilho S.A.; Águas de Andradina S.A.; and Saneaqua Mairinque S.A.) to operate water and/or sewage concessions granted by four municipalities in the State of São Paulo;
§executed an agreement with the Servitec/Tecniplan consortium for the use of small hydroelectric power plants in our water treatment stations in Guaraú and Vertedouro Cascata;
§executed an agreement with the basic sanitation company of the state of Alagoas to transfer technology for the reduction of water losses in the city of Maceió;
§executed a service agreement with the basic sanitation company of the state of Espírito Santo to license the use of our proprietary software “Aqualog” designed to remotely monitor water treatment;
§won two international public biddings for the provision of:  (i) consulting services relating to a program for the rational use of water and for the implementation of a new model for commercial and operational management of the Instituto de Acueductos y Alcantarillados Nacionales, the company responsible for the provision of the water and sewage services in the central provinces of Panama, and (ii) consulting services for the implementation of a new model for commercial and operational management in nine municipalities of Honduras;
§created a special purpose company (Aquapolo Ambiental S.A.), in partnership with a private sanitation services operator, to build and operate the largest water recycling facility in the southern hemisphere, which will supply up to 1,000 liters per second to industries in the São Paulo metropolitan region;
§rendered consulting services relating to the Municipal Basic Sanitation Plan to the municipality of Barro Alto, located in the State of Goiás; and
§created a special purpose company (ATTEND), in partnership with Estre Ambiental S.A., for the implementation of a structure to receive non-domestic water resources in the municipality of São Paulo, which will also have a pre-treatment water station.

In addition,·We are planning to install small hydroelectric power plants in connectionour water treatment plants in Guaraú and Cascata in conjunction with the expansionServitec/Tecniplan consortium.  We expect to start construction of the first two plants, with capacities of 4 and 2 MW, in the first half of 2013.

·We are working with the basic sanitation company of the state of Alagoas to transfer technology for the reduction of water loss in the city of Maceió.

·We have licensed our business,proprietary “Aqualog” software, which monitors water treatment remotely, to the basic sanitation company of the state of Espírito Santo.

27


·In partnership with the consultancy firm Latin Consult, we are providing consulting services to theInstituto de Acueductos y Alcantarillados Nacionales, the company responsible for water and sewage services in the central provinces of Panama, in the field of sustainable water use and to implement a new model for commercial and operational management.

·Also in partnership with Latin Consult, we are providing consulting services to nine municipalities in Honduras to implement a new commercial and operational management model.

·We have set up Aquapolo Ambiental S.A., a joint venture with a private sanitation services operator, which commenced operations in the second half of 2012 and operates the largest water recycling facility in the southern hemisphere, supplying up to 1,000 liters per second to industries in the Capuava petrochemical cluster in the São Paulo metropolitan region.

·We have set up Attend Ambiental, a joint venture with Estre Ambiental S.A., which is constructing a pre‑treatment and processing plant for non-domestic effluent in the São Paulo metropolitan region that is expected to commence operations in September 2013.

We are looking into (i) construction of a plant to produce energy from solid residue as well as (ii) the production and distribution of bio methane from gas generated in our sewage treatment processes.

We are also evaluating and may consider creatingthe formation of an investment vehicle expected to be known as Sabesp Participações through which we may makeintend to expand our business through equity investments.

We intend to continue to selectively seek new business opportunities to take advantage ofin which we may leverage our know-how,know‑how, size and scale.

Establish efficient and competitive ways of attracting, retaining and motivating our personnel.  We intend to become a reference in human resource management, providing our personnel with growth opportunities and recognition.  We seek to raise workplace satisfaction levels by establishing programs for the professional and personal development of our employees, particularly of those in managerial positions, setting attractive compensationcompetitive benefit packages and creating a healthy and collaborative work environment.


Streamline internal processes. We are implementing plans to increase our speed and productivity in responding to regulatory changes; strengthen and streamline our financial, commercial and administrative structure; and increase the efficiency of our operations; while also reducing costs.  To this end, in 2012 we began implementing an enterprise resourcing planning system to integrate all of our operational systems (financial, accounting, human resources, legal, purchasing and bid preparation) into a single platform alongside our management information system. 

We believe that our overall strategy will enable us to meet the demand for high quality water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo, in other Brazilian states and abroad, while strengthening our results of operations and our financial condition and creating shareholder value.

State of São Paulo

The State of São Paulo is one of 26 states that, together with the Federal District of Brasília, constitute the Federative Republic of Brazil.  The State of São Paulo is located in the southeastern region of the country, which also includes the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro, and which is, according to IBGE, the most developed and economically active region of Brazil.  The State of São Paulo is located on the Atlantic coast of Brazil withand is bordered by the States of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais to the north, the State of Paraná to the south and the State of Mato Grosso do Sul to the west.

The State of São Paulo occupies 3.0% of Brazil’s land mass and encompasses an area amounting to approximately 96,000 square miles.  According to the SEADE, the State of São Paulo had an estimated total population of 43.043.9 million as of December 31, 2011.2012.  The city of São Paulo, capital of the State of São Paulo’s capital,Paulo, had an estimated total population of 11.0 million, with 20.4a total population of 20.8 million inhabitants in the São Paulo metropolitan region, as of December 31, 2011.2012.  The São Paulo metropolitan region encompasses 39 cities municipalitiesand is the largest metropolitan region in the Americas and the thirdsixth largest metropolitan region in the world, according to the United Nations’ World Urbanization Prospects, 2009 Revision.  The São Paulo metropolitan region accounted for2011 Revision, with approximately 47% of the total population of the State of São Paulo as of December 31, 2011.2012.

28


According to the IBGE, the GDP of the State of São Paulo was approximately R$1.11.2 trillion in 2009,2010, representing approximately 33% of Brazil’s total GDP, and making it the largest economy of any state in Brazil based on GDP.  According to the IBGE, the State of São Paulo is also the leading Brazilian state in terms of manufacturing and industrial activity, with a strong position in car manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, computer manufacturing, steel making and plastics, among other activities, as well as a leading position in the banking and financial services industries.  The State of São Paulo is the most important exportingleading export state in Brazil, according to the Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade (Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior). 

History

Until the end of the nineteenth century, water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo were generally provided by private companies.  In 1875, the Province of São Paulo granted a concession for the renderingprovision of water and sewage services toCompanhia Cantareira de Água e Esgotos.  In 1893, the government of the Province of São Paulo assumed responsibility for the renderingprovision of water and sewage services fromCompanhia Cantareira de Água e Esgotos and formed the Office of Water and Sewers (Repartição de Água e Esgotos), a governmentalgovernment agency.  Since that time, water and sewage services in the São Paulo metropolitan region have been administered by the State government.  Historically, water and sewage services in substantially all other municipalities of the State were administered directly by the municipalities, directly either by municipal water and sewage departments or throughautarquiasof the municipal government. Autarquiasare relatively autonomous public bodies with separate legal standing, assets and revenues, created by law to undertakecarry out the administration of public services which are considered to be better managed bywhere the government deems that a decentralized administrative and financial structure.structure would be advantageous.

In 1954, in response to dramatic population growth in the São Paulo metropolitan region, the State government created the Department of Water and Sewers (Departamento de Águas e Esgotos), as anautarquiaof the State.  The Department of Water and Sewers provided water and sewage services to various municipalities in the São Paulo metropolitan region.

A major restructuring of the entities providing water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo occurred in 1968, with the creation of the Water Company of the São Paulo Metropolitanmetropolitan Region (Companhia Metropolitana de Água de São Paulo), or the COMASP, the purpose of which was to provide potable water on a wholesale basis for public consumption in the various municipalities of the São Paulo metropolitan region.  All assets relating to the production of potable water for the São Paulo metropolitan region previously owned by the Department of Water and Sewers were transferred to COMASP.  In 1970, the State government created the Superintendence of Water and Sewers of the city of São Paulo (Superintendência de Água e Esgoto da Capital), or the SAEC, was created by the State government to distribute water and collect sewage in the city of São Paulo.  All assets relating to water services previously owned by the Department of Water and Sewers in connection with the water services were transferred to the SAEC.  Also in 1970, the State created the Basic Sanitation Company of the São Paulo Metropolitanmetropolitan Region (Companhia Metropolitana de Saneamento de São Paulo), or the SANESP, to provide sewage treatment services for the São Paulo metropolitan region.  All assets relating to sewage services previously owned by the Department of Water and Sewers in connection with the sewage services were transferred to the SANESP.  The Department of Water and Sewers was subsequently closed.


On June 29, 1973, pursuant to State Law n. 119, COMASP, the SAEC and the SANESP merged to form our Company with the purpose of implementing the directives of the Brazilian government set forth in the National Water Supply and Sanitation Plan (Plano Nacional de Saneamento).  We were incorporated under the laws of Brazil as a limited company (sociedade anônima), for indefinite duration.  The National Water Supply and Sanitation Plan was a program sponsored by the Brazilian government, which financed capital investments in, and assisted in the development of, state-controlledstate‑controlled water and sewage companies.  Since our formation, other State governmental and State-controlledState‑controlled companies involved in water supply and sewage collection and treatment in the State of São Paulo have been merged into us and theour company.  The State has always been our controlling shareholder, as required by State Law n.No. 119.  We thus have therefore been integrated into the State governmental structure and our strategies have been formulated in conjunction with the strategies forof the State Department of Water Resources and Sanitation. Additionally, mosta majority of the members of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and our management are appointed by the State Government.

The29


Our capital expenditure budget for our capital expenditures is subject to approval ofby the State legislative chamber.  This approval is obtained simultaneously with the approval of the budgets of the Department of Sanitation, of the Department of Energy and of the State of São Paulo.  The Company isWe are also subject to supervision from the Court of Audit of the State of São Paulo (“Tribunal de Contas do Estado de São Paulo”), with regard to our accounting, financial and budgetary operationalactivities and our operating assets.

We provide water and sewage services directly to a large number of residential, commercial and industrial private consumers, on top ofas well as to a variety of public entities, in 363 of the 645 municipalities in the State, including in the city of São Paulo, as well as providing treatedPaulo.  We also supply water on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and to the municipality of Sumaré, in which we do not operate thewater distribution systems, to consumers. Amongand five of these municipalities we also provideutilize our sewage treatment services to five of them.services.  Currently, we are a leading provider ofthe fifth largest water and sewage servicesservice company in the world in terms of number of clients, according to the 1314th edition of thePinsent Masons Water Yearbook (2011-2012) (2012‑2013).

In 1994, we were registered with the CVM as a publically-heldpublicly-held company and are therefore subject to rules issued by the CVM,CVM’s rules, including those relating to the periodic disclosure of extraordinary facts or relevant events.  Our common shares have been listed on the BM&FBOVESPA under the ticker “SBSP3” since June 4, 1997.

In 2002, we joined theNovo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA, which is the listing segment in Brazil with the highest corporate governance requirements.  During thatIn the same year, we registered our securitiescommon shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and started trading our shares in the form of American Depositary Receipts – level III (“ADRs”) on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE.

In 2004, the State of São Paulo carried out a secondary offer of common shares held by the State of São Paulo was made simultaneouslyour company in the Brazilian and in the international market.markets.  On December 1, 2007, we became part of the BM&FBOVESPA Corporate Sustainability Index, or ISE, which reflects our high degree of commitment to sustainable environmental and social practices.

In December 2007, Law No. 1,025, allowedwhich provided for the creation of regulatory agencies for the supervision of water and sewage services. The same lawservices, created ARSESP, the regulatory agency that regulates and supervises the services we provide.

In JulySince 2008, we announcedhave expanded into various activities that we would expand the area reached bycomplement our water and sewage services, as well as including in our scope of services activities related to environmental and energy solutions, as required by the State Law No. 1,025. Since then, we have also been formingoften through partnerships with private companies to consolidate our operations insuch as the sanitation sector, in particular: (i) through afollowing:

·We have created four special purpose entity which provides services of water distribution and/or sewage treatment for certain municipalities in the State; (ii) we entered into a consortium with the consultancy firm Latin Consult to provide consultancy services in certain cities in Panama and Honduras for the rational use of water and the adoption of a new commercial and operational management model; (iii) the production, supply and commercialization of reused water and (iv) the implementation and operation of a station for the preconditioning of non-domestic wastewater, sludge conditioning and other related activities.

Other partnership led to the creation of the following companies: Sesammcompanies (SESAMM – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S/A; Águas de Castilho S.A.,; Águas de Andradina S.A., Saneáqua; and Saneaqua Mairinque S.A.) to operate water and/or sewage concessions granted by four municipalities in the State of São Paulo, all of which are already operating.

·We are planning to install small hydroelectric power plants in our water treatment plants in Guaraú and Cascata in conjunction with the Servitec/Tecniplan consortium.  We expect to start construction of the first two plants, with capacities of 4 and 2 MW, in the first half of 2013.

·In partnership with the consultancy firm Latin Consult, we are providing consulting services to theInstituto de Acueductos y Alcantarillados Nacionales, the company responsible for water and sewage services in the central provinces of Panama, in the field of sustainable water use and to implement a new model for commercial and operational management.

·Also in partnership with Latin Consult, we are providing consulting services to nine municipalities in Honduras to implement a new commercial and operational management model.

·We have set up Aquapolo Ambiental S.A. Águas de Castilho S.A. e, a joint venture with a private sanitation services operator, which commenced operations in the second half of 2012 and operates the largest water recycling facility in the southern hemisphere, supplying up to 1,000 liters per second to industries in the Capuava petrochemical cluster in the São Paulo metropolitan region.

30


·We have set up Attend Ambiental, a joint venture with Estre Ambiental S.A., which is constructing a pre‑treatment and processing plant for non-domestic effluent in the São Paulo metropolitan region that is expected to commence operations in September 2013.

Although we do not necessarily hold a majority capital participationstake in these companies, shareholderthe shareholders’ agreements provide us with veto powers or qualified votes on certain matters those business associates may come across.matters.


Corporate Organization

In 2005, we reorganized our corporate management structure.  As a result, weWe currently have six management divisions, each of which is supervised by one of our executive officers.

The allocation of responsibilities among the executive officers is made by ourOur board of directors afterallocates responsibilities to our executive officers following an initial proposal made by theour Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with our bylaws.  The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for coordinating all management divisions in accordance with the policies and directives established by our board of directors and board of executive officers, including the coordination, evaluation and control of all functions related to the Chief Executive Officer’s office and staff, integrated planning, business management and organization, corporate communication, audit, ombudsman, and regulatory matters.  The Chief Executive Officer represents our Companycompany before third parties and some of its representationcertain powers can be granted to attorneys-in-fact.attorneys‑in‑fact.  The executive officers described below report to the Chief Executive Officer:

§·        the Corporate Management Officer, who is responsible for marketing, human resources and quality control programs, legal affairs, information technology, asset management, legal and procurement, and contracts;

§·        the Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, who is responsible for financial planning, costs and tariffs, raising capital and allocating financial resources to all divisions within the Company,of our company, conducting capital markets and other indebtedness-relateddebt incurrence transactions and managing indebtednessdebt levels, control department,financial controls, accounting, corporate governance and investor relations;

§·the Technology, Enterprises and Environment Officer, who is responsible for the environmental planning and management, technologicaltechnology and operating, productoperation engineering, quality control, developments andthe development, coordination and execution of special investment programs, projects, and new businesses;businesses, and

§·        the Chief Operating Officer offor the São Paulo Metropolitan Region Division and the Chief Operating Officer offor the Regional Systems Division, who are responsible for managing the operation, maintenance, execution of planning and works for the water and sewage supply systems including planning and works(including for ourthe services renderedthat we provide on a wholesale basis,basis), sales and call center services, as well asand have overall responsibility for the control of economic-financialfinancial and operational performance of its division.  Thesetheir divisions.  The Chief Operating Officers are also responsible for sanitation advisory services to autonomous municipalities and for the mediation and the negotiation with communities and local governments, aimed at aligning our interests with the interests of our clients.

Capital Expenditure Program

Our capital expenditure program is designed to improve and expand our water and sewage system and to increase and protect our water sources in order to meet the growing demand for water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo.  Our capital expenditure program has four specific goals inwith respect to the municipalities we serve:

(i)    to continue to meet the maximum demand for treated water;

(ii)   to expand the percentage of households connected to our sewage system;

(iii)  to increase the treatment of sewage collected; and

(iv)  to increase operating efficiency and reduce water losses.loss.

From 2009Our capital expenditures from 2010 through 2011, our capital expenditure program2012 totaled R$ 6.4 billion,7.1 billion.  These investments focused primarily to buildon building up our infrastructure and for our efforts to reducereducing water losses.loss.  We have budgeted investments in the total amount ofR$7.99.9 billion from 20122013 through 2015.2016.  We invested R$1.82.5 billion, R$2.4 billion and R$2.2 billion in 2012, 2011 and R$2.4 billion in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.

31


The following table sets forth our planned capital expenditures for water and sewage infrastructure for the years indicated.

 

Planned Capital Expenditures

 

2012

2013

2014

 

2015

Total

 

(in millions ofreais)  

Water

745.9

599.2

607.2

579.6

2,532

Sewage

926.7

991.4

845.9

368.2

3,132

Others

336.5

395.4

504.9

988.2

2,225

Total

2,009

1,986

1,958

1,936

7,889


 

Planned Capital Expenditures

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

1,014.9

981.1

923.9

784.4

3,704.2

Sewage Collection

1,130.1

1,153.1

1,018.2

948.0

4,249.4

Sewage Treatment

444.5

488.4

469.8

542.2

1,945.0

Total

2,589.5

2,622.7

2,411.9

2,274.6

9,898.6

 

Our capital expenditure program from 20122013 through 20152016 will continue to focus on achieving our targets by making regular investments into maintain and expandingexpand our infrastructure as well as making investmentsand to reduce water loss in the reduction of water losses throughout the 363 municipalities we served as of December 31, 2011.2012.

Main Projects of Our Capital Expenditure Program

The following is a description of the main projects in our capital expenditure program.

Metropolitan System Investment Program

Metropolitan Water Program

Demand for our water services has grown steadily over the years in the São Paulo metropolitan region and has exceeded at times exceeded the capacity of our water systems.  As a result, prior to September 1998, parta portion of our customers in this region received water only on alternate days of the week.  We refer to this as “rotation.”  In order to remedy this situation, we implemented the Metropolitan Water Program (Programa Metropolitano de Água) to improve regular water supply to the entire São Paulo metropolitan region.  This program terminated in 2000 and the rotation was eliminated, but we have maintained our investment projectionsplans for the region.  DuringIn the second phase of the Metropolitan Water Program, betweenwhich started in 2006 and 2014,is expected to run through 2018, we plan to expandare expanding the infrastructurecapacity of our water storage tanks by 210,000 cubic meters and to constructconstructing 44 water pumping stations and 240 kilometers of mains.mains pipelines.  The investment in this phase is expected to reach R$2.7 billion and the construction is expected to expand theour water production capacity by 13.2 cubic meters per second until 2014.  We have been working on this project since 2006, and we expectmeters.  At the moment, the program is being updated to complete it by 2014.meet future demands through 2020.  In 2011,2012, we invested approximately R$102.595.2 million respectively, in this project.

Total investments made from 2006 to December 31, 2012 amounted to R$1.3 billion, including our own funds and financing from Caixa Econômica Federal and by Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (“BNDES”).

São Lourenço Project

The metropolitan region suffers from a water shortage, which requires us to obtain water from increasingly distant sources.  In order to remedy this situation, we are currently developing a new supply system called São Lourenço, thatwhich will expand our production capacity by 4.7 m3/s and should be able to benefit a population of almost 1.5 million people.  We have already concluded the project’s conceptual studies and are currently developing its infrastructural projects.  We may proposeIn November 2012, a public notice concerning the completion of construction projects through Public-Private Partnerships (Parceria Público‑Privada) (“PPP”) was published.

Alto Tietê Public Private Partnership to the government of São Paulo.

In June 2008 we entered into aformed the Alto Tietê Public Private Partnership (Parceria Público-Privada), or PPP, with Cab Spat, a special purpose company known as Cab Spat, whose main shareholders are Cab Ambiental and Galvão Engenharia S.A.  The Alto Tietê PPP is part of the Metropolitan Water Program and aims to improve the reliability, flexibility and availability of the integratedwater system that serves the São Paulo metropolitan region.  Through this PPP, Cab Spat will be responsible for (i) expandingcarried out certain infrastructure works, which was completed in December 2011, and expanded the Taiaçupeba water treatment plantAlto Tietê System nominal capacity from ten10 cubic meters per second to 15 cubic meters per second, (ii) building 17.7 kilometers of water connections and mains, (iii) building four water storage tanks with total capacity of 70,000 cubic meters, (iv) installing boosters, and (v) building pumping stations.  The total investment in projectssecond.  We intend to be undertakencomplete payment for these investments by 2024.

32


Cab Spat during the first two years of the PPP is estimated at R$320.0 million.  Cab Spat willhas also undertaken to perform maintenance on the dams of the Alto Tietê System, in connection with which Cab Spat will also provideSystem’s dams on an ongoing basis.  This maintenance work consists of civil engineering, electromechanical and operational services, as well as sludge treatment, and the corresponding services regarding water adduction and water supply.

The total value of theestimated cost for this project is estimated at R$1.0 billion.  We intend to pay these investments over 15 years upon the completionAs of the contracted projects and services.  In December 2011, the services were concluded and the system’s nominal capacity was increased from 10 to 15 cubic meters per second, directly benefiting 1.5 million people in the east region of the São Paulo metropolitan region, in addition to improving the reliability, flexibility and availability of the integrated water system that services the state’s metropolitan region.  The increase in production will improve the east, north and west regions water supply levels since it will be possible to transfer water from the east system to other localities.  In 2011,31, 2012 we had invested approximately R$ 121.4 million in this project.350 million.

Tietê Project

The Tietê river crosses the São Paulo metropolitan region and receives most of the region’s run‑off and wastewater.  The environmental status of the river reached a critical level in 1992.  In an effort to reverse the situation, the State of São Paulo created a recovery program designed to reduce pollution of the Tietê river by installing sewage collection lines along the banks of the Tietê river and its tributaries.  These lines collect raw sewage and deliver it to our sewage treatment facilities.  We completedcarried out the first phase of the program between 1992 and 1998.

In connection with the first phase of the Tietê Project, (Projeto Tietê), in June 1998, we completed the construction of three additional sewage treatment facilities and invested ain June 1998.  This involved total investment of US$1.1 billion, of which US$450.0450 million was financed by the Inter-AmericanInter‑American Development Bank, or IADB, approximately US$100 million by theCaixa Econômica Federal,, or the Caixa, and approximately US$550 million by us.


The second phase of the project, which was carried out from 2000 through 2008, with investments of approximately US$500 million, of which US$200.0 million were financed by the IADB, R$60.0 million by the BNDES, and R$180.0 million by the BNDES through another financial institution.  In this phase,involved installing 290,000 sewage connections and more than 1,500 kilometers of sewage collectionscollection networks, branch collectors and interceptors were installed and/or built. interceptors.  Total investments in this phase amounted to approximately US$500 million, of which US$200 million was financed by the IADB, R$60 million by BNDES directly, and R$180 million by BNDES through another financial institution.

The main objective of thisthe second phase was to continue expanding and optimizing the sewage systems ofsystem in the São Paulo metropolitan region, focusing primarily focusing on actions that allow forimprovements to expand the delivery of a higher volume of raw sewage to the sewage treatment facilities that were built in the first phase of the Tietê Project.phase.  Upon the conclusion of the second phase of the project in 2008, we were able to collect approximately 5,000 liters of raw sewage per second and send it for treatment into the five sewage treatment plants ofin our integrated system.system for treatment.  As part of the second phase of the Tietê Project, we implemented a geographic information system named SIGNOS.  SIGNOS is a management information system which automates and integrates various business processes, including project management, maintenance, operations and customer service and maps out our entire municipal infrastructure in the São Paulo metropolitan region.

The first and second phases of the Tietê Project contributed to an increase from 70.0% to 84.0% in the sewage collection rate and an increase from 24.0% to 70.0% in the treatment of the sewage collected in the São Paulo metropolitan region.  As a result, the sewage collection system benefitedcovered a total of 15.8 million people (5.1 million more than the number of people served when the Tietê Project was initiated), and the sewage treatment benefitedsystem covered 11.1 million people (8.5 million more than the number of people served when the Tietê Project was initiated).

As of December 31, 2011, we owed US$386.9 million to the IADB for the financing it provided.  For further information on the agreement entered into with the IADB, see “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Sources.”  We currently provide secondary treatment to approximately 68% of the sewage collected in the São Paulo metropolitan region.  The five principal sewage treatment facilities in the São Paulo metropolitan region have an aggregate installed capacity of 18 cubic meters of sewage per second and currently treat an aggregate of 15.615.7 cubic meters of sewage per second.  We plan to build additional collection lines to direct more raw sewage to our treatment facilities.

The third phase of the Tietê Project designated as “the decontamination of the Tietê river,” aims at contributing to the recuperation ofremediate the water quality ofin the Tietê river basin through the expansion of the level ofby expanding collection levels to 87.0% and sewage treatment of sewagelevels to 84.0% in the São Paulo metropolitan region.  The total estimated cost of the third phase is approximately US$1.12 billion, of which US$600.0600 million will be financed pursuant toby a loan from the IADB Loan entered into on September 3, 2010.  The program planthird phase consists principally of the third phase comprises mainly (i) drainagefollowing items:

·improvements to the effluent collection (collectionsystem through collection networks and home connections), (ii) connections;

33


·removal and transport of the drainageeffluent for treatment (branchthrough branch collectors and interceptors),interceptors; and (iii) 

·the construction between 2009 and 2016 of new sewage treatment plants not only of the integrated drainage system ofin the São Paulo metropolitan region, but also of various isolated systems in the same region, during a six-year period from 2010 to 2016.  region. 

Approximately 43%45% of the work for the third phase is already under executionconstruction, and 25%a further 26% is undergoingin the process of public bidding processes.  Aftertender.  Following completion of the third phase of the Tietê Project, the sewage collection system will benefitserve an additional 1.5 million people and the sewage treatment system will benefitserve an additional 3.0 million people.  We have invested R$698 million in the third phase, R$328 million of which during 2012.

We are currently planning the fourth and final phase of the Tietê Project, which should take placeis expected to be constructed between 20132014 and 2018.2020.  The main objective of the fourth phase ifis to completelyput an end the dumpingto all discharge of untreated sewage into the Tietê river in the area infor which we are the water services provider.

Corporate Program for Reduction of Water Loss Reduction 

The objective of the Corporate Program for Reduction of Water Loss Reduction (Programa(Programa Corporativo de Redução de Perdas)Perdas de Água) is to decreasereduce water losses moreloss efficiently by means of the integrationintegrating and expansion of theexpanding existing initiatives in our business units.  WeThis program has a 12‑year term that began structuring the program in the second half of 2007 and finalized it in 2008.2009.  We have invested R$1.0 billion in this project so far, including R$328.0 million invested in 2012, and anticipate total investments of approximately R$4.35.5 billion throughout the program’s 11-year term beginning in 2009.of the program.  Funding for the program will come from our own resources as well as from loan agreements entered with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), withcredit facilities provided by JICA, Caixa Econômica Federal and with BNDES.  The program aims to reduce the incidence of water loss from 436 liters per connection per day in December 2008 to 211280 liters per connection per day in 2019,2020, which is equivalent to reducing water lossesloss from 27.8% in December 20082009 to 15.0%19% in 2019. This goal will be revised based on the results reached so far and the expected reduction with the implementation of the Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction in the 2012-2019 period.

In 2011, we invested approximately R$326.7 million in this program.2020.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the water loss index remained relatively stable at 25.7%.  Our aim was to keep the water loss index at 25.2% but this was not possible due to (i) contractual difficulties in our efforts to reduce losses were reducedin theBaixada Santistaarea, we have since become party to 25.6% from 26%new contracts, (ii) difficulty in 2010.replacing service connections, specifically in urban areas, and (iii) more accuracy in water volumes in the Guaraú Water Treatment Station which is located within our main water producing system.


New Life Program

The New Life Program (Programa Vida Nova) includesconsists of various projects focusedthat focus on the improvementpreservation and preservationimprovement of water reserves in the São Paulo metropolitan region, and the urban development of the region, especially in the Guarapiranga and Billings mains.reservoirs.  The resources will be mostly invested in the creation of infrastructure to collect sewage in the region, and to directtransport it to treatment plants while avoiding its pouring directlyin order to reduce the discharge of effluent into the springs.water sources.  The program also includes the protection activities of green areasspaces and the urbanization offavelas(shantytowns) and is expected to directly benefit 50,000 families.58,000 families by 2015.

The State government, local authorities and the federal government willare expected to invest approximately R$1.3 billion in this program.  Our total investments in the program.  We will fund this program withare expected to amount to R$355.0 million.355 million, of which we invested R$37.3 million during 2012 for a total of R$81.7 million as of December 31, 2012.  The State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources coordinates the program with the involvement of our involvementcompany and that of the Urban Development Company of São Paulo (Companhia de Desenvolvimento Habitacional e Urbano), or the CDHU, and local governments in the region.

As of December 31, 2011, R$45.5 million have been invested in this program by us, of which R$29.4 million were invested in 2011.

Clean Stream Program

The Clean Stream Program (Programa Córrego Limpo) is, a partnership between the State, acting through us,our company, and the municipality of São Paulo, and aims to clean and decontaminate urban streams in the city of São Paulo by improvingeliminating the sewage sanitary system, the eliminationdischarge of sewage throughinto streams and rainwater galleries, therunoff routes, cleaning of streams and stream borders, as well as the removalbanks, and relocationremoving and relocating of properties located on the banks of streams.  Total investments made in riverbanks.  Asthis program amounted to R$710.3 million as of December 31, 2011, approximately2012, of which we had invested R$129.5 million had been invested in this program and 103110 million.  116 urban streams hadhave been decontaminated since 2007, benefiting approximately 1.7 million people.

                In 2012,people, and we expect to decontaminate 45 additional urbana further 33 streams in 2013, benefiting over 700305 thousand people. The estimated capital expenditures for this program in 2012 is R$36 million.  

34


Regional Systems Investment Programs

We currently have a number of projects in progress and planned for theour Regional systems, including projects relatingSystems.  These relate to the abstraction of water andas well as to the collection, removal and final disposal of sewage.  We invested approximately R$1,091.0 million,1.2 billion, R$943.7 million1.1 billion and R$1,109.2 millions,0.9 billion in these projects in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, respectively, and we have budgeted for additional capital expenditures of approximately R$ 2.22.8 billion from 20122013 through 2015.2016.

Clean Wave Program

The main goals of the Clean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa) are to improve and expand the sewage systems in the municipalities comprising the Baixada Santista metropolitan region, increasing the sewage collection rate to 95.0%95%, and treating 100.0%100% of the collected sewage, and thereby improving bathing water quality at 82 beaches in the region by 2013.  On August 6, 2004, we entered into a credit agreement with the JBIC forend of the financingdecade.  This project is being carried out in two phases, the first of this project,which has started and the second of which is guaranteedin the planning phase.  The first stage is expected to be completed by 2016, aiming at increasing the Federative Republic of Brazil,sewage collection rate to 82%.  The funds will come from our own resources as well as from loan agreements entered with JICA and from the Government Severance Indemnity Fund for a total amount of R$382.8 million.  On October 1, 2008, the JICA incorporated the loan transactions of the JBIC.  For further information on the agreement entered into with the JICA, see “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Sources.”  Employees(Fundo de Garantia por tempo de Serviço), or FGTS.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had invested approximately R$1.61.7 billion in this program, R$ 159.8 millionof which R$135.7 millionwas invested during 2012.  As a result, sewage collection increased from 53% to 71%, and the year 2011 treatment of collected sewage rose from 96% to 100%. With

After completing the completion of construction of sewage treatment plants and installation of networks, we have prioritizedare prioritizing the connection of costumerscustomers to the sewage collection system.  UntilAs of December 31, 2012, we had completed 79,000 domestic connections, compared to a target of 123,000 at the same date.

Additionally, complimentary works of the first stage shall be executed between 2013 and 2016, including an addition of 37 thousand sewage connections due to the population increase motivated by the economic development of the region.  We expect to evaluate the service of sewage collection rate by 82% by the end of 2011, we had finished 63,000 connectionsthis phase.  These works have an approximated investment value of R$400 million and are currently being bid for.

The second phase is in planning for the total 123,000 expected.period between 2015 and 2020.

Northern Coast Clean Wave Program

The Northern Coast Clean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa Litoral Norte) will expandaims at expanding the collection and treatment of sewage inon the Northernnorthern coast of the State of São Paulo, intending to benefit 600 thousand people, including the local population as well as tourists that each year visit the region.  By 2015, theregion each year.  The program willaims to increase the collection and treatment of sewage rate in the region from 36.0% in 2008 to 85.0%, seeking to improvethereby improving the health and well-beingwell‑being of the population in addition toand stimulating economic development through thean increase in tourism in the region.tourism.

In 2011,During 2012, we continued workingwork on two sewage treatment plants in the city of São Sebastião and other sewage system projects in the cities of Ubatuba, Ilhabela and São Sebastião, which we expect to complete in 2013.  Until 2011,The funds will come from our own resources, as well as from loan agreements entered with BNDES, with Caixa Econômica Federal and from the FGTS.  As of December 31, 2012, we had invested R$114.6125.9 million had already been invested in this program, of which R$ 24,624.3 million werewas invested during 2012.  We expect to invest a total of R$500.0 million in 2011.this project by 2018.


Coastal Water Program

The Coastal Water Program (Programa Água no Litoral) is the main combination of long-termcombines various long‑term activities to expand water production capacity in the Baixada Santista metropolitan region and Southern Coastthe southern coast of the State of São Paulo.  AlmostThe program aims to benefit approximately three million people, including both the local population and tourists, are expected to benefit from this program.  This program will enable ustourists.  It aims to increase the level of reliability of the local systems, eliminating existing and potential deficiencies and irregularities in the water supply.  It is also expected to permit us to expand our servicesThrough this program we aim to reach universal coverage in these regions, increase the availability of treated water and improve the quality of water available to the population.  AsThe fund will come from our own funds and financing from Caixa.

35


During the first phase of December 31, 2011, R$472.7 million has been invested on this program we have focused on increasing water production from the Mambu/Branco water system in order to satisfy demand and we expect to investR$1.1 billionimprove water quality in the program by 2013.  The Mambu/Branco Water Production System issouthern part of this program.  It will increase water production to supply municipalities in the south of the Baixada Santista increasingmetropolitan region.  This phase, which is approaching finalization, aims to increase production from actualMambu/Branco from 0.6 cubic metermeters per second to 1.6 cubic meters per second.  Additionally,

As of December 31, 2012, we had invested R$569.1 million in this program, of which R$129.3 million was invested during 2012.  We expect to invest a total of R$1.1 billion in this project by the planned water treatment stationsend of Jurubatuba, Itú and Cubatão are also part of this program.2013.

New Policies and Programs

Nossa Guarapiranga

In December 2011, we launched the Nossa Guarapiranga project, whosethe main objective of which is to recoverremediate the water quality ofin the Guarapiranga basin, which is a water source for the São Paulo metropolitan region.  WeThe basin serves one million people directly in the areas near Guarapiranga, and indirectly serves a further two million people who consume the water from the basin.  Through capital investment of R$12.2 million, we installed 11 drains to collect residue from rivers in the Guarapiranga basin.  We plan to collect an average of 20 cubic meters of residue per day.The fund will come from our own funds.

Pró-Conexã‑Conexão

In December 2011, the municipality of São Paulo approved a project to offer residences of low-income families subsidizedsubsidize connections to the sewage system.system for low‑income families.  The project involves capital expenditure amountsexpenditures of up to R$349.5 million 80% of which would80% will be sustainedprovided by the State government and 20% by us.  In the first year of the Stateprogram we completed approximately 700 connections, which was less than our initial goal but focused on areas of importance for water sources such as the southern part of the São Paulo while 20% would be paid by us.metropolitan region, near the Billings reservoir.  We believe that this program will increase the efficiency of our sewage collection programs and help improve water quality ofin the region’s rivers and basins, on top ofas well as improving the quality of life of low-incomefor low‑income families.

We expect that thethis program will create 192192,000 new thousand connections over the next 8eight years, and affectbenefiting approximately 800 thousand people.

Water is Life

In November 2011, we created the programThe Water is Life whichprogram, established in November 2011, aims to provide water and sewage services to 41 low-incomelow‑income and isolated communities of non-urbanized areas of 20 municipalities in the regions of Alto Paranapanema and Vale do Ribeira.  After installing the required infrastructure, an estimated capital expenditure of R$6 million, we will be responsible for maintaining and operating the sewage systems to reachRibeira, covering approximately 13 thousand people.  In this project we are responsible for supplying water to, and the municipalities are responsible for installing, Individual Sanitary Units (Unidades Sanitárias Individuais), a technology designed for low‑income and isolated communities.  Regarding the supply of water, we invested approximately R$700 thousand in well drilling.  We expect to invest approximately R$15.6 million by 2014.  An amount of approximately R$6 million was estimated for sewage infrastructure contruction, to be financed by the State Government.  However, this estimated funding is currently being increased to support this project.

B.Business Overview

Our Operations

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we provided water and sewage services to 363 municipalities in the State of São Paulo either under concession agreements, program agreements, under another formother forms of legal arrangementarrangements or under nowithout formal agreement.agreements.  We also supply treated water on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and to the municipality of Sumaré.  Pursuant to articleregion.  Article 2 of our bylaws our corporate purpose includespermits us to carry out the following activities:  provision of water supply and sewage services, urban rain water management and drainage services, urban cleaning services and solid waste management services.  In addition, our bylaws authorize us to carry out other related activities, including the planning, operation and maintenance of production systems, the storage, preservation and trading of energy, and the trading of services, products, benefits and rights that, directly or indirectly, result from our assets, projects and activities, and the right to operate a subsidiary anywhere in Brazil or abroad to provide the services mentioned above.

Because of36


Following the enactment of the Basic Sanitation Law, which regulates the basic sanitation industry in Brazil, we currently operate under two different contractual environments:  (i) for the concession agreements that have already expired, we are currently renegotiating or will negotiate a new agreementagreements that followsfollow the terms and conditions of the Basic Sanitation Law, or program agreements;known as “program agreements”; and (ii) for the concessionagreements that have not expired, we will continue to operate under the terms and conditions of the previousexisting concession agreements, except in circumstances where the Basic Sanitation Law is applicableapplies even whenthough the concession agreement is still valid.in force.  For further information on this topic, see “Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.”


The Basic Sanitation Law required water and sewage service providers, such as us, to execute a formal agreement by December 31, 2010 with every municipality to which they provide services without a valid legal and binding instrument.  If we failed to enter into such formal agreements by December 31, 2010, the concessions would no longer be valid.  As of December 31, 2011, 992012, 67 of our concessions were still in the process of regularizationbeing regularized through the execution of formal agreements. See “3.D. RisksRisk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We cannot anticipate the effects that further developmentscurrently lack formal agreements or concessions with 67 of the Basic Sanitation Lawmunicipalities to which we provide service, and its interpretation38 of our existing concession agreements will have on the basic sanitation industryexpire between 2013 and 2034.  We may face difficulties in Brazil and on us” and “3.D. Risks Factors—Risks Relatingcontinuing to Our Business—We have not entered into formal agreements for the provision ofprovide water and sewage services with certain of thein return for payment in these and other municipalities, and we serve, including municipalities in metropolitan regions, as required by the Basic Sanitation Law, and therefore we may not be able to enforce our rights tocannot assure you that they will continue to providepurchase services in these municipalities.from us on the same terms or at all.

Concessions

Pursuant to the Brazilian Constitution, the authority to develop public water and sewage systems is shared by the states and municipalities, with the municipalities having primary responsibility for providing water and sewage services to their residents.  The Constitution of the State of São Paulo provides that the State shall assure the correct operation, necessary expansion and efficient administration of water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo by a company under its control.

According to the Basic Sanitation Law, existing concessions will remain in effect until payment of indemnification is made based on the valuation of investments.  The Basic Sanitation Law provides that our new concession agreements be planned, supervised and regulated by the municipalities together with the State under a new model of associated management that will allow for better control, supervision, transparency and efficiency in the provision of public services.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we provided water and sewage services to 363 municipalities.  Substantially all of these concessions have 30-year30‑year terms.  Due to court orders, we temporarily suspended our services in fivefour other municipalities (Araçoiaba da Serra, Cajobi,(Cajobi, Iperó, Álvares Florence and Macatuba), that as of December 31, 2011 accounted for less than 0.1% of our gross revenues. In January 2011, we resumed the provisionoperating revenues and our intangible assets as of our services to the municipality of Tarumã that had been previously suspended by a court order.December 31, 2012.  For more information, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Concession-RelatedConcession‑Related Legal Proceedings.”  Between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011,2012, we entered into contracts with 225258 municipalities (including our services agreement with the city of São Paulo) in accordance with the Basic Sanitation Law, of which 25,33 were entered into in 2011.2012.  As of December 31, 2012, these 258 municipalities accounted for 69.9% of our gross operating revenues (including revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure).  In addition to the contracts that have 30-year30‑year terms, the municipalities entered into cooperation contracts with the State of São Paulo, delegating the regulation and monitoring of the provision of services to the ARSESP.  As of December 31, 2011, 992012, 67 of our concessions had expired but we continued to provide water and we have beensewage services to all 67 municipalities and were in negotiationnegotiations with these municipalities to execute program agreements to substitute the expired concessions.  From January 1, 20122013 through 2033, 392034, 38 concessions will expire.  Despite these 99 concessions having expired in 2011, we are renegotiating them and we were continuing to provide water and sewage services to all 99 municipalities as of December 31, 2011.  We have entered into an agreement with the State and city of São Paulo for the provision of water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo for a 30-year term expiring in June 2040, which in the year ended December 31, 2011 accounted for 51.4% of our gross revenues from sales and services (including revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure). 

In February 2006, we created a new division to manage the renewal of expiring concessions.  The main responsibility of this division, which reported directly to the Chief Executive Officer, was to renew and thus maintain the existing base of municipalities that we operate and formalize contracts under the new model of associated management.  Following the increase in the demand for regulatory work, this division shifted its focus towe created a regulatory affairs department, which focuses on regulatory matters and its main roles currently involve centralizinghas centralized communication with the regulatory agencies, driving business to the new regulatory regime and proposing matters in which we have an interest to the ARSESP.

In April 2011, we created a specific area in our Financial, Economic and Investor Relations Office responsible for costs and tariffs, given the subject’s importance to the continuation of our business.  We also created a statutory Regulatory Affairs Committee.  The committee is composed of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, our Metropolitan Officer and our RegionalSystem Systems Officer and is responsible for defining the guidelines, strategies and regulatory recommendations for our Company and coordinating the work of the Regulatory Affairs Department.

37



 

The current concessions are based on a standard form of agreement between us and the relevant municipality.  Each agreement received the prior approval of the legislative council of each municipality.  The assets comprising the existing municipal water and sewage systems are transferred from the municipality to us in order for us to provide the contracted services.  Until 1998, we acquired municipal concessions and the existing water and sewage assets in exchange for our common shares issued at book value.  Since 1998, we have acquired concessions and water and sewage assets by paying the municipality an amount equal to the present value of 30 years of estimated cash flows from the date of acquisition of the concession, assuming a discount of at least 12% certain discount factor to us, from the concession being acquired..  For reference purposes, ARSESP has set the discount rate adopted infor concession contracts was set by the ARSESP in 2011 at 8.6%.8.06% since 2011.

The main provisions of theour existing concession agreements are as follows:

§

·we assume all responsibility for providing water and sewage services in the municipality;

§

according to the municipal laws authorizing the concession, we could collect tariffs for our services without prior authorization of the municipality.  Tariff readjustments follow the guidelines established by the Basic Sanitation Law and the ARSESP; 

§

as a general rule, to date, we are exempt from municipal taxes, and no royalty is payable to the municipality with respect to the concession; 

§

we are granted rights of way on municipal property for the installation of water pipes and mains, and sewage lines; and 

§

upon termination of the concession, for any reason, we are required to return the assets comprising the municipality’s water and sewage system to the municipality and the municipality is required to pay us the non-amortized value of the assets, considered intangible since January 2008, relating to the concession.  See Note 2.12 to our financial statements.

·according to the municipal laws authorizing the concession, we are permitted to collect tariffs for our services without prior authorization of the municipality.  Tariff readjustments follow the guidelines established by the Basic Sanitation Law and ARSESP;

·as a general rule, to date, we are exempt from municipal taxes, and no royalties are payable to the municipality with respect to the concession;

·we are granted rights of way on municipal property for the installation of water pipes and mains, and sewage lines; and

·upon termination of the concession, for any reason, we are required to return the assets that comprise the municipality’s water and sewage system to the municipality and the municipality is required to pay us the non‑amortized value of the assets relating to the concession.

·These assets have been considered to be intangible assets since January 2008.  See Note 2.10 to our financial statements.  Under the concession agreements executed prior to 1998, the reimbursement for the assets may be through payment of either:

§

the book value of the assets; or 

§

the market value of the assets as determined by a third-party appraiser in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement.

othe book value of the assets; or

othe market value of the assets as determined by a third‑party appraiser in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement.

In Brazil, there are three federal legal regimes for contracting water and sewage services:  (i) public concessions, regulated by Law No. 8,987/1995, which require a prior public bidding process; (ii) administration of public services through cooperation agreements between the federal government and local public authorities at State and municipal level without the need for a public bidding process, regulated by the Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law; and (iii) public‑private partnerships, regulated by Law No. 11,079/2004, used to grant concessions to private companies to provide public services and used in relation to construction works associated with the provision of public services.  Until 2005, we had adopted the regime for public concessions.  Following the entry into force of the Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law, we adopted the administration of public services through cooperation agreements, which can be used alongside the other two regimes.

Since 1998, our contracts that we have entered into with municipalities for the provision of sanitation services have been regulated by the Federal Concessions Law No. 8,987/1995.  Generally, these contracts have a 30-year30‑year term, and the total value of the concession is set by the discounted cash flow method.  Under this method, when the expected contractual cash flow is reached, the total value of the concession and assets is amortized to zero on our books and we receive no payment for the assets.  If the concession is terminated prior to the end of the 30-year30‑year term, thereby interrupting the normal contractual cash flow, we are paid an amount equal to the present value of the expected cash flow over the years remaining in the concession, adjusted for inflation.

Federal Law No. 11,107, or the Federal Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law, established the legal basis for the administration of public service contracts, giving greater rights and obligations to municipalities who are responsible for sanitation services greater rights and obligations and setting out more clearly the provision of services and the responsibilitiesof the parties.  New agreements entered into following the expiry of concession agreements under the previous law will follow this new model.  See “—Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.”

38


Our new agreement model follows the provisions of the Basic Sanitation Law.  TheIts main contractual provisions among others, areinclude the joint execution of responsibilities related to planning, supervision and regulation of services, andthe appointment of a regulatory authority offor the services, and periodic disclosure of accounts.financial statements.

Furthermore, the economic and financial formulas in new agreements must be based on the discounted cash flow methodology and on the revaluation of returnable assets. Pursuant to the Basic Sanitation Law, our ownthe preexisting assets will be returnable assets, but wereturned to the grantor of the concession. We will carry out all new investments and the municipalities will record them as assets.  The municipalities will then transfer possession of these assets to us for our use and management and will also record a credit in the same amount of the assets recorded in ourfavor.  According to Article 42 of the Basic Sanitation Law and the new agreement model, investments made during the contractual period are the property of the applicable municipality, which in turn generates receivables for us that are to be recovered through the operation of the services.  These receivables may also be used as guarantees in funding operations.


Another important development was that the new agreement model includes exemptions from municipal taxes applicable on our operational areas and the possibility of the revaluation of our assets that existed prior to the execution of the program agreements in cases involving the early resumption of services by the concession authority.

Municipalities have the inherent power under Brazilian law to terminate concessions prior to their contractual expiration dates for reasons of public interest.  The municipalities of Diadema and Mauá, two municipalities we previously served, terminated our concessions in February 1995 and December 1995, respectively.  The municipality of Mauá terminated our concession with our consent.  The municipality of Diadema had terminated our concession without our consent after asserting that we did not provide adequate water and sewage services.  In 2011 we and the municipality of Diadema agreed with us to develop a shareshared infrastructure for the provision of water and sewage services through a mixed-capital company calledCompanhia de Água e Esgoto deCAED.  According to the agreement, the amount owed to us by Diadema, or would be repaid through the issuance of shares in CAED.  We areHowever, CAED has not yet ablebeen established, and we cannot predict whether or when it will be created or begin operations.  The receivables owed to predict when CAED will begin operations.us by Mauá and Diadema total R$85.9 million and R$60.3 million, and have not been recognized in our financial statements due to the uncertainty of our ability to collect.  Despite these developments, we currently serve the municipalities of Diadema and Mauá through the supply of water on a wholesale basis.  The indemnities receivables relatedbasis to the municipality ofboth Diadema and Mauá totaled R$ 85.9 million are not being recognized in the financial statements due to the uncertainties in the collection..  For further information on the lawsuits that arose out of these developments,matters, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings – Concession – Related Legal Proceedings.”

We currently do not anticipate that other municipalities will seek to terminate concessions due to our close relationship with municipal governments, recent improvements in the water and sewage services we provide, and the obligation of the municipality to repay us for the return of the concession as described above.  concession.However, we cannot be certain that other municipalities will not seek to terminate their concessions in the future.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—MunicipalitiesThe municipalities may under certain circumstances, terminate our concessions before their expiration and thethey expire in certain circumstances.  The indemnification payments we receive in such cases may be inadequate to recoverless than the full value of our investments.the investments we made.

In addition, there iswe are currently ongoinginvolved in litigation with respect to municipalities that intend to expropriate our water and sewage systems, or to terminate concession agreements before paying us any indemnification.  For a detailed discussion on these proceedings, see “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Concession-RelatedConcession‑Related Legal Proceedings.”

Operations in the City of São Paulo and Certain Metropolitan Regions

As of December 31, 2011, 992012, 67 concessions had expired which jointly accounted for 23.8%18.6% of our gross revenues.  We entered into 2533 agreements in the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, bringing the total number of program agreements entered into between 2007 and 20112012 to 225.258.  These 2533 new agreements accounted for 2.9%4.3% of our total revenues and 3.3%4.2% of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2011.2012.

39


The Basic Sanitation Law provides that, in case of termination of the relationship with the aforementioned municipalities, the municipalities should pay us an indemnity, in an amount to be appraised, notwithstanding the non-existence of a concession agreement.

On June 23, 2010 the State and the cityCity of São Paulo entered intoexecuted an agreement in the form of a convention with the intermediationconvênio, to which we and consent of our Company and of the ARSESP pursuant toconsented, under which they agreed to jointly manage the planning of and investment infor the basic sanitation system of the city of São Paulo among other things.  This agreement established that theon a joint basis.  The principal terms of thisconvênio were as follows:

·The State and the cityCity of São Paulo would enter into anexecute a separate agreement with us, granting us exclusive rights in the provision ofto provide water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo.  In addition, the agreement established the role of the

·ARSESP in regulatingwould regulate and overseeingoversee our activities and established a management committee that will be responsible for planning the water and sewage services and for reviewing our investment plans.  The management committee will be composed of six members appointed for two year terms.  The State and the city of São Paulo will have the right to appoint three members each.  We are permitted to participate in the meetings of the management committee; however, we are not afforded any voting rights. 


On June 23, 2010, we entered into a formal agreement with the State and the city of São Paulo to regulate the provision ofregarding water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo, including tariffs.

·A management committee (Comitê Gestor) would be responsible for planning water and sewage services for the city and for reviewing our investment plans.  The management committee consists of six members appointed for two-year terms.  The State and the City of São Paulo have the right to appoint three members each.  We may participate in management committee meetings but may not vote.

In application of theconvênio, we executed a 30-year period,separate contract with the State and the city of São Paulo, also dated June 23, 2010, to regulate the provision of these services for the following 30 years.  The principal terms of this contract are as follows:

·The total investment stated in the contract must be equal to 13% of gross revenues from the provision of services to the city of São Paulo, net of the taxes on revenues, which may be extended for an additional 30-year period.  The Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009 authorizedtotal approximately R$500 million per year. 

·We must transfer 7.5% of the gross revenues we derive under theconvênio, and subtract (i) COFINS and PASEP taxes, and (ii) unpaid bills of publicly owned properties in the city of São Paulo, to enter into an agreement with us.  The agreement establishes, among other things, how specific amounts of gross revenues from the services we render should be allocated (after deduction of COFINSMunicipal Fund for Environmental Sanitation and Infrastructure (Fundo Municipal de Saneamento Ambiental e Infraestrutura),  established by Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009.

·        PASEP).  This agreement requires, among other things, (i) to invest at least 13.0% of the gross revenues from sales and services we obtain from the municipality of São Paulo, net of taxes on revenues in the improvement of water and sewage infrastructure in the city of São Paulo; (ii) that ourOur investment plan must be compatible with the activities and programs included in the sanitation planplans of the State, the sanitation plan of the cityCity of São Paulo and, if necessary, the Metropolitan region.

·ARSESP will ensure that the tariffs will adequately compensate us for the services we provide and that tariffs may be adjusted in order to restore the original balance between each party’s obligations and economic gain (equilíbrio econômico‑financeiro). 

·We currently have an investment plan in place that reflects these obligations and addresses their compatibility with the sanitation plan ofplans for the metropolitan region363 municipalities in which we operate, that include, the City of São Paulo;Paulo and, (iii) that we contribute 7.5% ofif necessary, the gross revenues we obtain from this agreement to the São Paulo Municipal Sanitation Fund.Metropolitan region.  The investment plan under this agreement is not irrevocable and will be reviewed by our management committee every four years, especiallyparticularly with regardsrespect to the investments to be executed in the subsequent period. In addition, the agreement provides that the ARSESP will ensure that the tariffs charged (a) will adequately compensate us for the services we provide and (b) can be adjusted to restore the original balance between each party’s obligation and economic gain (equilíbrio econômico‑financeiro).  Finally, the agreement envisages the remuneration of the net assets in operation, calculated preferably through asset valuation or by the monetarily updated book value, to be established by the ARSESP.  The agreement also foresees the remuneration of the investments to be made by us, such that there will be no residual value at the end of the contract period.  We currently have an investment plan in place that consider these obligations and also addresses the compatibility with the activities and programs included in the sanitation plan of the State and of the municipality of São Paulo and, if necessary, the plan of the metropolitan region of São Paulo.  

Wholesale Operations

Wholesale Water Services on a Wholesale Basis

We provide water services on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region (Diadema, Mauá, Santo André, São Caetano do Sul, Guarulhos and Mogi das Cruzes) and to the municipality of SumaréThe agreementsAgreements to provide water services on a wholesale basis must comply with the Basic Sanitation Law, which designates these services as “interdependent activities” and regulates the stageseach stage of the provision of eachservice.  The law requires that the service designating them as interdependent activities whose provision requires the supervision ofbe supervised by an independent agency, a specificstipulates registration forof the activities’ cost of the service, and requires assurance of payment among the several service providers in order to continue the provision of the services, in accordance with the rules to be published by the ARSESP.  Our agreements currently comply with the provisions of the Basic Sanitation Law.  In 2011,2012, the revenues from thesewholesale water services were R$203.5187.4 million.

We are currently negotiating withIn 2011, we and the citymunicipality of Diadema so asagreed to liquidatedevelop shared infrastructure for water and sewage services through a mixed capital company to be called Companhia de Agua e Esgoto de Diadema, or CAED.  According to the outstanding debtsagreement, the amount owed to us by Diadema would be repaid through the issuance of shares inCAED.  However, CAED has not yet been established, and Sanedwe cannot predict whether or when it will be created or begin operations.  Feasibility studies have been completed and indicate that CAED would have a viable business, but the Diadema municipal authorities have started new negotiations to us.amend the legislation that provided for the setting up of CAED.  We can give no assurance that we will recover the amount owed to us by Diadema, whether through an investment in CAED or otherwise.  For further information on this outstanding debt, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

40


Wholesale Sewage Services on a Wholesale Basis

We provide sewage services on a wholesale basis to the municipalities of Mogi das Cruzes, Santo André, São Caetano, Mauá and Diadema.  The negotiation of theOur agreement for the provision of sewage services on a wholesale basis with the municipality of Santo André hadfor these services was executed with the intervention of the Public Prosecution Office, and inOffice.  Our agreements with the other municipalities the negotiation of the agreements was a result ofresulted from our environmental efforts concerning the environment and themunicipal authorities’ awareness of the municipal public authorities regarding to environmental issues.  Through these agreements, in 20112012 we treated about 27.2approximately 35 million cubic meters of sewage from these municipalities.  This is an example of our social-environmental responsibility actions andWe believe this illustrates our commitment to these actions.social and environmental responsibility.  In 2011, the2012, our revenues from wholesale sewage services on a wholesale basis were R$21.123.8 million.

In December 2008, we entered into a five-yearfive‑year agreement for the collection and treatment of 20.0%20% of the sewage generated by the city of Guarulhos.  Due to the complexity of the construction works related to the provision of these services, weWe have not yet started to provide these services, and such services will only commence when the works on linking the Guaralhos sewage services to our sewage system are finalized.  These works are the city of Guarulhos.responsibility the Guarulhos sanitation company.

Description of Our Activities

As set forth in Article 2 of our bylaws, our corporate purpose iswe are permitted to render basic sanitation services with the goal of providing basic sanitation services to the entire population in the municipalities where we conduct our activities without harming our long-termlong‑term financial sustainability.  Our activities comprise water supply, sanitary sewage services, urban rainwater management and drainage services, urban cleaning services, solid waste management services and related activities, including the planning, operation, maintenance and commercialization of energy, and the commercialization of services, products, benefits and rights that directly or indirectly arise from our assets, operations and activities.  We are allowed to act in a subsidiary form in other Brazilian locations and abroad.  See “—Government Regulation—Concessions—Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management.”  For a description of our operating segments please see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012.


Operating segments are presented in our annual report in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to management, comprised of the board of directors and the board of executive officers, pursuant to IFRS 8.  Under Brazilian GAAP, prior to our conversion to IFRS, the financial information for construction services was not separately presented and construction costs related to concessions were capitalized within property, plant and equipment. As a result, our management did not review the results of this business. Following our conversion to IFRS, our management decided to continue to exclude the construction results from the management reporting of our revenues and expenses, thus not basing his decisions on discrete financial information for that business.  The characteristics described in paragraph 5(b) of IFRS 8 for separate operating segments are thus not fulfilled for this particular business. Nonetheless, after our conversion to IFRS and for IFRS consolidation purposes only, we started to record such results separately as construction revenue and costs under IFRIC 12.  Although such information is available discretely, however, it is not analyzed by our management as such and is not the basis for operational decisions.

We set forth below a description of our activities.

Water Operations

Our supply of water to our customers generally involves abstraction of water from various sources, subsequent treatment and distribution to our customers’ premises.  In 2011,2012, we produced approximately 2,992.03.1 million cubic meters of water.  The São Paulo metropolitan region (including the municipalities to which we supply water on a wholesale basis) currently is, and has historically been, our core market, accounting for approximately 71% of water invoiced by volume in 2011.2012.

41


The following table sets forth the volume of water that we produced and invoiced for the periods indicated.

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

(in millions of cubic meters)

(in millions of cubic meters)

Produced:

 

 

São Paulo metropolitan region

2,091.7

2,164.4

2,182.8

2,235.3

2,182.8

2,164.4

Regional systems

753.2

787.9

809.2

823.5

809.2

787.9

Total

2,844.9

2,952.3

2,992.0

3,058.8

2,992.0

2,952.3

 

 

 

Invoiced:

 

 

 

São Paulo metropolitan region

1,083.9

1,119.2

1,150.6

1,181.9

1,150.6

1,119.2

Wholesale

288.0

293.3

297.3

297.5

297.3

293.3

Regional systems

546.1

579.5

596.8

614.0

596.8

579.5

Reused water

0.8

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.3

Total

1,918.8

1,992.3

2,045.0

2,093.8

2,045.0

1,992.3

 

The difference between the volume of water produced and the volume of water invoiced generally represents both physical and non-physicalnon‑physical water losses.loss.  See “—Water Losses.Loss.”  In addition, we do not invoice:

§·        water discharged for periodic maintenance of water mains and water storage tanks;

§·        water supplied for municipal uses such as firefighting;

§·        water consumed in our own facilities; and

§·        estimated water lossesloss associated with water we supply tofavelas(shantytowns). 

Seasonality

Although seasonality does not affect our results in a significant way, in general, higher water demand is observed during the summer and lower water demand during the winter.  The summer coincides with the rainy season, while the winter corresponds to the dry season.  The demand in the coastal region is increased by tourism, with the greatest demand occurring during the Brazilian summer holiday months.

Water Resources

We can abstract water only to the extent permitted by DAEE pursuant to water usage rights granted by it.  Depending on the geographic location of the river basin or if the river crosses more than one state (federal domain), the approval of the National Water Agency (Agência Nacional de Águas), or ANA, a federal agency under the Ministry of the Environment is required.  We currently abstract substantially all of our water supply from rivers and reservoirs, with a small portion being abstracted from groundwater.  Our reservoirs are filled by impounding water from rivers and streams, by diverting the flow from nearby rivers, or by a combination of both methods.

In order to supply water to the São Paulo metropolitan region, we rely on20on 20 reservoirs of non-treatednon‑treated water and192and 210 reservoirs of treated water, which are located in the areas under the influence of the eight water producing systems comprising the interconnected water system of the São Paulo metropolitan region.  The capacity of the water sources available for treatment in this area is 72 cubic meters per second.  Total current installed capacity is 72.773.2 cubic meters per second, which can be treated from the interconnected water system of the São Paulo metropolitan region.  Average verified production during 20112012 on the interconnected water system of the São Paulo metropolitan region was 67.969.4 cubic meters per second.  TheCantareira, Guarapiranga and Alto Tietê systems, as a whole, supplied 84.1%84.7% of the water we produced for the São Paulo metropolitan region in 2011.2012.


In 2011,2012, the Cantareira system accounted for 46.4%47.1% of the water that we supplied to the São Paulo metropolitan region (including the municipalities to which we supplied water on a wholesale basis), which represented 73.9%74.1% ofour gross operating revenues from sales and services (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure) for the year.  The authorization (outorga) for the Cantareira system to use the water in the Piracicaba water basin was renewed on August 6, 2004, for a ten-yearten‑year period.

42


Water basin committees are authorized to charge both for water usage and the dumping of sewage into water bodies.  Since February 2003, we have been incurring expenses in connection with the use of water from the Paraíba do Sul river basin and, since January 2006, from the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí river basins.  At the end of 2010, we started to incur expenses in connection with the use of water from the Sorocaba and Médio Tietê river basins Inand, since 2012, from Baixada Santista basin.  During 2013 we may start to incur expenses in connection with the use of water from the Alto Tietê basin where the metropolitan region of São Paulo metropolitan region is located,and from Baixada Santista,also in the basins of Baixo Tietê, Tietê/Batalha, Tietê/Jacaré, Baixo Pardo e Grande, Mogi Guaçu, Pardo, Sapucaí Mirim/Grande, Serra da Mantiqueira, Ribeira do Iguape/Litoral Sul, Pontal do Paranapanema and Tietê/Batalha river basins. The Turvo/Grande.

ARSESP has adjusted our tariffs according to the formula that we have used since 2003.  According to the formula, “non-controllable”“non‑controllable” costs, such as costs related to water use, are passed on to our customers through our tariffs.  Although we expect to continue to pass on these expenses to our customers through our tariffs, we are uncertain as to whether the river basin committees will change the terms of the charges currently applied and whether we will be able to pass on these costs to our customers.  On March 2013, ARSESP disclosed Resolution 406, in which the annual tariff readjustment formula was approved, which will be used in the second tariff cycle.  This formula consists of IPCA percentage variation for the referred period adjusted by the efficiency factor which transfers part of the productivity gains to the users and by an adjustment factor for the variations in the quality of the services rendered, and this last adjustment is still to be defined and applied from the second tariff cycle in three years’ time.  Regarding the mentioned resolution, the cost for the use of water shall be included in our consumers’ bill.  For more information on water usage regulation, see “—Water Usage.”

The following table sets forth the water production systems from which we produce water for the São Paulo metropolitan region:

Production Rate(1)

Production Rate(1)

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

Water production system:

(in cubic meters per second)

(in cubic meters per second)

Cantareira

32.7

31.5

32.7

31.5

32.7

Guarapiranga

13.0

12.6

13.7

12.6

13.0

Alto Tietê

10.9

13.0

12.4

13.0

10.9

Rio Claro

3.9

4.0

3.7

4.0

3.9

Rio Grande (Billings reservoir)

4.8

4.6

4.7

4.6

4.8

Alto Cotia

1.1

1.2

1.2

1.1

Baixo Cotia

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.8

Ribeirão da Estiva

0.1

0.1

0.1

Total

67.3

67.9

69.4

67.9

67.3

_______________________________

(1)   Average of the twelve months ended December 31, 20102012, 2011 and 2011. 

2010.

We own all of the reservoirs in our production systems other than the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs and a portion of some of the reservoirs of the Alto Tietê system, which is owned by other companies controlled by the State.  We currently do not pay any charges with respect to the use of these reservoirs.  In December 2001, we entered into an agreement with the State whereby the State, among other things, agreed to transfer the remaining reservoirs in the Alto Tietê system to us.  We accepted, on a temporary basis, the reservoirs in the Alto Tietê System as part of the payment until the State transfers the property rights with respect to the reservoirs to us.  We are unable to predictassure you whether and when these reservoirs will be transferred to us because the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action alleging that a transfer to us of ownership of the Alto Tietê System reservoirs is illegal.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Control by the State of São Paulo—We may be required to acquire reservoirs that we use and that are owned by a State-controlled company, or we may be required to pay substantial charges to the owner with respect to our use of these reservoirs.”

43


In January 2009, we began operating, monitoring and maintaining the reservoirs in the Alto Tietê system, formed by the Ponte Nova, Paraitinga, Biritiba, Jundiaí and Taiaçupeba reservoirs.  See “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information——Legal Proceedings—Other Legal Proceedings.”

In the cities of the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo, our principal source of water consists of surface water from nearby rivers and from wells.  The coastal region is provided with water principally by surface water from rivers and mountain springs.

Statewide, we estimate that we are able to supply nearly all of the demand for water in all of the areas where we operate, subject to droughts and extraordinary climate events.  We were able to meet the demand for water in the São Paulo metropolitan region, primarily as a result of our water conservation program,reductions in water losses,loss, and the installation of new water connections.  We installed 201,000,212,775, 207,900 and 189,400  and 207,900 new water connections in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, respectively.


The interconnected water system of the São Paulo metropolitan region servicesserves 30 municipalities, of which 24 are operated directly by us under this system.  Through this system, we serve the other six municipalities on a wholesale basis, and the distribution is made by other companies or departments related to each municipality.

In order to reach the final customer, the water is stored and transported through a complex and interconnected system.  This water system requires permanent operational supervision, engineering inspection, maintenance, and quality monitoring and measurement control.

To ensure the continued provision of regular water supply in the São Paulo metropolitan region, we intend to invest R$1.33.7 billion from 20122013 to 20152016 to increase our water production and distribution capacities as well as to improve the water supply systems.  In 2011,2012, our total investment in water supply systems amounted to R$633.2 million.1.0 billion.

Water Treatment

We treat all water at our water treatment facilities prior to placing it into our water distribution network.  We operate 213214 treatment facilities, of which the eight largest, located in the São Paulo metropolitan region, accountsaccount for approximately 70% of all water we produced in 2011.2012.  The type of treatment used depends on the nature of the source and quality of the untreated water.  Water abstracted from rivers requires extensive treatment, while water drawn from groundwater sources requires less treatment.  All water treated by us also receives fluoridation treatment.

Water Distribution

We distribute water through our own networks of water pipes and mains, ranging in size from 2.5 meters to 100 millimeters in diameter.  Storage tanks and pumping stations regulate the volume of water flowing through the networks to maintain adequate pressure and continuous water supply.  The following table sets forth the total number of kilometers of water pipes and mains and the number of connections in our network as of the dates indicated.

As of December 31,

2009

2010

2011

As of December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

Water distribution pipes and mains (in kilometers)

63,732

65,379

66,389

67,647

66,389

65,379

Number of connections (in thousands)

7,118

7,295

7,461

7,679

7,481

7,295

 

More than 90.0% of the water pipes in our water distribution network are made of cast iron or polyvinylchloride, or PVC.  Distribution pipes at customers’ residences typically are made from high-densityhigh‑density polyethylene tubing.  Our water mains are mostly made of steel, cast iron or concrete.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, our water distribution pipes and mains included:  (i) 33,99734,816 kilometers in the São Paulo metropolitan region; and (ii) 32,39232,832 kilometers in the Regional systems.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had384had 405 storage tanks in the São Paulo metropolitan region with a total capacity of1.8of 2.0 million cubic meters, and1,782storageand 1,759 storage tanks in the Regional systems.  As of that date, we had124had 124 treated water pumping stations in the São Paulo metropolitan region aqueduct system, including stations at treatment facilities, intermediate trunk transfer pumping stations and small booster stations serving local areas.

44


Water mains that require maintenance are cleaned and their lining is replaced.  We are typically notified of water main fractures or breaks by the public through a toll-freetoll‑free number maintained by us.  We consider the condition of the water pipes and mains in the São Paulo metropolitan region to be adequate as of the date of this annual report.  Due to age, external factors such as traffic, the dense population, and commercial and industrial development, water pipes and mains in the São Paulo metropolitan region are somewhat more susceptible to degradation than those in the Regional systems.  To counter these effects, we have a maintenance program in place for water pipes and mains that is intended to address anticipated fractures and clogs due to brittleness and encrustation, and to help ensure water quality in the region.  The new customers are responsible for covering the part of the costs of connecting to our water distribution network that areis related to the connectingconnection of customers water pipes that are more than 20 meters away from the water mains.  Thereafter, the customer must cover the costs of connecting to the network from the customer’s premises, including costs of purchasing and installing the water meter and related labor costs.  We perform theinstallation of the water meter and conduct periodical inspections and measurements.  After completion of installation, the customer is responsible for the water meter.


The following table sets forth projected new water connections for the periods indicated.

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2012-2019

 

in thousands

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2013
‑ 2020

São Paulo metropolitan region

88

90

88

83

86

84

82

81

682

95

99

94

85

84

76

708

Regional systems

70

71

72

76

74

75

76

77

588

80

77

78

78

79

80

82

82

636

Total

158

161

160

156

160

159

158

1,270

175

176

177

172

164

164

158

1,344

 

Water LossesLoss

The difference between the amount of water produced and the amount of water invoiced generally represents both physical and non‑physical water losses.loss.  Water loss percentage represents the quotient of (i) the difference between (a) the total amount of water produced by us less (b) the total amount of water invoiced by us to customers minus (c) the volume of water set out below that we exclude from our calculation of water losses,loss, divided by (ii) the total amount of water produced by us.  We exclude the following from our calculation of water losses:loss:  (i) water discharged for periodic maintenance of water mains and water storage tanks; (ii) water supplied for municipal uses such as firefighting; (iii) water we consume in our facilities; and (iv) estimated water lossesloss associated with water we supply tofavelas(shantytowns). 

Among the principal indicators utilized to measure rates of water loss are the following:

·Index of Revenue Loss (IRL), in %; and

·Index of total loss per connection, (TLdC) in liters/connection per day.

These indicators are calculated by applying the following formulas:

Vproduced – (Vbilled + Vused)
IRL = ______________________________________
                                Vproduced

Vproduced – (Vmicromeasured + Vused)
(TLdC)   = _____________________________________________________
                                Nconnection x  nº  of days of a given period

Where:

Vproduced:  corresponds to the volume of water produced at a given period;

Vbilled:  corresponds to the volume of water billed at a given period;

45


Vmicromeasured:  corresponds to the volume of water micromeasured at a given period;

Vused:  corresponds to the volume of water used for operational, public, private and social needs (supply shantytown areas) at a given period; and

Nconnections:  corresponds to the average number of active water connections.

Since 2005, we have used a method of measuring our water lossesloss based on worldwide market practice for the industry.  According to this measurement method, average water losses areloss is calculated by dividing (i) average annual water loss by (ii) the average number of active water connections multiplied by 366.  The result of this calculation is the number of liters of water lost per connection per day.

Using this calculation method, as of December 31, 2011,2012, we experienced469 liters/connectionsexperienced 474 liter/connection per day of water lossesloss in the São Paulo metropolitan region and 280 liters/connections270 liter/connection per day in the Regional systems, averaging 394 liters/connections393  liter/connection per day.  We plan to reduce total water losses from 394 liters/connections per dayloss to 211around 280 liters/connection per day between 2011 and, 2019.  Over the same period, in terms of percentage, we intend to reduce total water losses from 25.6% to 13.0%, however, this goal will be revised based on the results reached so far and the expected reduction with the implementation of the corporate program for water loss reduction in the 2012-2019 period.19% by 2020.

Our strategy to reduce water loss has two approaches:


§

reduction in the level of physical losses, which result mainly from leakage, primarily by replacing and repairing water mains and pipes, and installing probing and other equipment, including strategically located pressure-regulating valves; and 

§

reduction of non-physical losses, which result primarily from the inaccuracy of our water meters installed at our customers’ premises and at our water treatment facilities, and from clandestine and illegal use, by upgrading  and replacing inaccurate water meters and expanding our anti-fraud personnel.
·reduction in the level of physical loss, which results mainly from leakage. To this end we are primarily replacing and repairing water mains and pipes, and installing probing and other equipment, including strategically located pressure‑regulating valves; and

·reduction of non‑physical loss, which results primarily from the inaccuracy of our water meters installed at our customers’ premises and at our water treatment facilities, and from clandestine and illegal use. To this end we are upgrading and replacing inaccurate water meters and expanding our anti‑fraud personnel.

We are taking measures to decrease physical lossesloss by reducing response time to fix leakages to less than 24 hours and by better monitoring non‑visible water mains fractures.  Among other initiatives, we have adopted the following measures to reduce physical water losses:loss:

·the introduction of technically advanced valves to regulate water pressure throughout our water mains in order to maintain appropriate water pressure downstream.  These valves are programmed to respond automatically to variations in demand.  During peak usage, the flow of water in the pipes is at its highest point; however, when demand decreases, pressure builds up in the water mains and the resulting stress on the network can cause significant water loss through cracks and an increase in ruptures of the pipes.  The technically advanced valves are equipped with probes programmed to feed data to the valve in order to reduce or increase pressure to the water mains as water usage fluctuates.  As of December 31, 2012, we had installed 1,828 valves at strategic points in the network, with 1,077 valves being installed in the São Paulo metropolitan region and 751 in the Regional systems;

§

the introduction of technically advanced valves to regulate water pressure throughout the water mains in order to maintain the appropriate water pressure to the downstream consumption needs each day.  These valves are programmed to respond automatically to variations in demand.  During peak usage, the flow of water in the pipes is at its highest point; however, when demand decreases, pressure builds up in the water mains and the resulting stress on the network can cause significant water loss through cracks and an increase in ruptures of the pipes.  The technically advanced valves are equipped with probes programmed to feed data to the valve in order to reduce or increase pressure to the water mains as water usage fluctuates.  As of December 31, 2011, we had installed 1,783 valves at strategic points in the network, with 1,055 valves being installed in the São Paulo metropolitan region and 728 in the Regional systems;   ·the reconfiguration of interconnected water distribution to permit the distribution of water at lower pressure;

§

the reconfiguration of interconnected water distribution to permit the distribution of water at lower pressure;   

 40·the implementation of routine operational leak detection surveys in high water pressure areas to reduce overall water loss;

·the monitoring of and improved accounting with respect to water connections, especially for large volume customers;

·regular checking on inactive customers and monitoring non‑residential customers that are accounted for as residential customers and, therefore, billed at a lower rate;

·preventing fraud with the use of new, more sophisticated water meters that are more accurate and less prone to tampering;

·installing water meters where none are present; and

46


 

 

§

·conducting preventive maintenance of existing and newly installed water meters.

the implementation of routine operational leak detection surveys in high water pressure areas to reduce overall water losses;

§

the monitoring of and improved accounting with respect to water connections, especially for large volume customers;

§

regular checking on inactive customers and monitoring non-residential customers that are accounted for as residential customers and, therefore, billed at a lower rate;

§

preventing fraud with the use of new, more sophisticated water meters that are more accurate and less prone to tampering;

§

installing water meters where none are present; and

§

conducting preventive maintenance of existing and newly installed water meters.

Water Quality

We believe that we supply high quality treated water that is consistent with standards set by Brazilian law, which are similar to the standards set in the United States of America and Europe.  Pursuant to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saúde) regulations, we have significant statutory obligations regarding the quality of treated water.  These laws set certain standards that govern water quality.

In general, the State of São Paulo has excellent water quality from underground or superficial water sources.  However, high rates of population growth, increased urbanization and disorganized occupation of some areas of the São Paulo metropolitan region has reduced the quantity and quality of water available to serve the population in the southern area of the São Paulo metropolitan region and in the coastal region.  Currently, we successfully treat this water to make it potable.  We also work to recover the quality of water of mains and invest in improvements of our treatment systems to ensure the quality and availability of water for the upcoming years.

Water qualityisquality is monitored at all stages of the distribution process, including at the water sources, water treatment facilities and on the distribution network.  We have 15 regional laboratories, one central laboratory, and laboratories located in all water treatment facilities that monitor water quality, as required by our standards and those set by statute.  Our laboratories analyze an average of 50,000 samples per month on distributed water, with samples collected from residences.  Our central laboratory located in the city of São Paulo is responsible for organic compound analysis using the chromatographic and spectrometric methods, as well as heavy metals analysis by atomic absorption technique.  All of our laboratories have obtained the ABNT NBR ISO 9001 certification and our central laboratory and 1112 of our regional laboratories have obtained the ABNT NBR ISO IEC 17025 accreditation (accreditation for general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories) awarded by the National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality (Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial), or the INMETRO.

All chemical products used for water treatment are analyzed and follow strict specifications set out in recommendations made by the National Health Foundation (Fundação Nacional de Saúde), or NHF, the Brazilian Association of Technical Rules (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas), or the ABNT, and the American Water Works Association, or the AWWA, to eliminate toxic substances that are harmful to human health.  From time to time, we face problems with the proliferation of algae, which may cause an unpleasant taste and odor in the water.  In order to mitigate this problem, we work on:  (i) fighting algae growth at the water source and (ii) using advanced treatment processes at the water treatment facilities, which involve the use of powdered activated carbon and oxidation by potassium permanganate.  The algae growth creates significant additional costs for water treatment because of the higher volumes of chemicals used to treat the water.  In 2011,2012, we did not detect significant algae growth.

We participate in the New Life Program which includes a Water Source Program (Programa Mananciais), together with other organizations engaged in the promotion of urban development and social inclusion to mitigate the pollution problem in the São Paulo metropolitan region.  In addition, we also participate in the Clean Stream Program to clean up important streams in the city of São Paulo.  Other initiatives also aimed at improving the water quality in our water sources located in the metropolitan region of São Paulo are Guarapiranga andPró-Conexã‑Conexão.  See “—Capital Expenditure Program—Main Projects of Our Capital Expenditure Program—Metropolitan System Investment Program—New Life Program and Clean Stream Program.”

We believe that there are no material instances where our standards are not being met.  However, we cannot be certain that future breaches of these standards will not occur.


Fluoridation

As required by Brazilian law, we have adopted a water fluoridation program designed to assist in the prevention of tooth decay among the population.  Fluoridation primarily consists of adding fluorosilicic acid to water at 0.7 parts per million.  We add fluoride to the water at our treatment facilities prior to its distribution into the water supply network.

47


Sewage Operations

We are responsiblefor the collection and removal of sewage through our sewage systems and for its subsequent disposal with or without prior treatment.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we collected approximately86%approximately 87% of all the sewage produced in the municipalities in which we operate in the São Paulo metropolitan region.  In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, we collected approximately 71%76% of all the sewage produced in the municipalities in which we operate in the Regional systems.  During 20112012, we accounted forcollected approximately 82%83% of all the sewage produced in the municipalities in which we operated in the State of São Paulo.  We installed 184,900,240,687, 246,400 and 233,500 and 246,400 new sewage connections in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, respectively.

Sewage System

The purpose of our sewage system is to collect and treat sewage and to adequately dispose of the treated sewage.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we were responsible for the operation and maintenance of 45,07345,778 kilometers of sewage lines, of which approximately 23,64524,087 kilometers are located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and 21,42821,691 kilometers are located in the Regional systems, respectively.

The following table sets forth the total number of kilometers of sewage lines and the total number of sewage connections in our network for the periods indicated.

As of December 31,

2009

2010

2011

As of December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

Sewage lines (in kilometers)

42,895

44,287

45,073

45,778

45,073

44,287

Sewage connections (in thousands)

5,520

5,718

5,921

6,128

5,921

5,718

 

Our sewage system comprises a number of systems built at different times and constructed primarily from clay pipes and, more recently, PVC tubing.  Sewage lines larger than 0.5 meters in diameter are primarily made of concrete.  Our sewage system is generally designed to operate by gravitational flow, although pumping stations are required in certain parts of the system to ensure the continuous flow of sewage.  Where pumping stations are required, we use sewage lines made of cast iron.

The public sewage system operated by us was structured in order to receive industrial sewage and sewage from non-domesticnon‑domestic sources for treatment together with domestic sewage.  Industrial sewage has physical, chemical and/or biological characteristics that are qualitatively different from household effluents.  As a result, the discharge of industrial sewage into the public sewage system is subject to compliance with specific legal demands with the purpose to protectof protecting the sewage collection and treatment systems, the health of operators and the environment.  The current environmental legislation establishes standards for the discharge of these effluents into the public sewage system.  These standards are defined in Article 19A of State Decree No. 8,468 dated September 8, 1976.  To ensure compliance with legislation, periodic auditsinspections of the sewage produced by all industrial clients are conducted, and we also request self-monitoringself‑monitoring reports from non-domestic sewage-producingnon‑domestic sewage‑producing sources.

The discharge of these effluents into the public sewage system is based on technical and administrative procedures.  Before the discharge is permitted, we carry out acceptance studies that assess the capacity of the public sewage system to receive the discharge as well as the compliance with regulations.  Upon the conclusion of these studies, the technical and commercial conditions for receiving the discharge are established, which are then formalized in a document signed by us and the effluent producer.  Failure to comply with these conditions can lead to the application of penalties and the obligation of the effluent producer to conduct the necessarycertain adjustments to their business practices in a given time frame.  Non-complianceNon‑compliance with these penalties and adjustments may ultimately result in the suspension of the connection and notification of the environmental protection agency (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo), or the CETESB, in order for the applicable measures to be taken.  Effluents from our treatment facilities must comply with effluent limitation guidelines and observemeet the water quality standards of the receiving water bodies established by federal and state legislation.  Effluent limitation guidelines consist of a set of parameters that must be verified before the effluents are discharged into a water body.  Water quality standards are based on the classification of water bodies, and take into account the current orand expected use of water.  These standards willhave historically become more and more rigorous according to the importance of the use of water.as water is a scarce resource.

48



 

We considered the condition of the sewage lines in the São Paulo metropolitan region to be adequate as of the date of this annual report.  Due to a greater volume of sewage collected, a higher population and more extensive commercial and industrial development, the sewage lines in the São Paulo metropolitan region are more deteriorated than those of the Regional systems.  To counter the effects of deterioration, we maintain an ongoing program for the maintenance of sewage lines intended to address anticipated fractures arising from obstructions caused by system overloads.

Unlike the São Paulo metropolitan region, the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo State does not generally suffer obstructions caused by sewage system overload.  The coastal region, however, experiences obstructions in its sewage lines primarily due to infiltration of sand, especially during the rainy season in the summer months.  In addition, the sewage coverage ratio in the coastal region is significantly lower than in the other regions served by us, with approximately 99%59% of all residences in the coastal region currently connected to our sewage network as of December 31, 2011.2012.

New sewage connections are made on substantially the same basis as connections to water lines:  we assume the cost of installation for the first 20 meters of sewage lines from the sewage network to all customers’ sewage connections and the customer is responsible for the remaining costs.

The following table sets forth projected new sewage connections for the periods indicated.

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2012-2019

 

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2013-2020

São Paulo metropolitan region

99

102

117

126

145

144

148

81

962

107

128

135

125

117

105

121

973

Regional systems

106

105

114

101

104

118

113

879

110

114

111

108

118

118

123

101

903

Total

205

207

231

227

249

262

266

194

1,841

217

242

246

243

235

228

222

1,876

 

Sewage Treatment and Disposal

In 2011,2012, approximately 86%68% and 75%94% of the sewage we collected in the São Paulo metropolitan region and the Regional systems, respectively, or 82%77% of the sewage we collected in the State of São Paulo, was treated at our treatment facilities and afterwards discharged into receiving water bodies such as inland waters and the Atlantic Ocean, in accordance with applicable legislation.Our sewage treatment facilities have a limited capacity.  Flows in excess of this capacity areThe sewage collected that is not directly connected to sewage treatment plants is discharged directly, untreated, to inland waters and the Atlantic Ocean.  waters.

We currently operate 481493 sewage treatment facilities and nine ocean outfalls.

We operate 490 activated sewage treatment facilities,outfalls, of which the five largest, located in the São Paulo metropolitan region, have treatment capacity of approximately 18 cubic meters of sewage per second.

In the São Paulo metropolitan region, the treatment process used by most treatment facilities is the activated sludge process, where there is a liquid phase and a solid phase that generates sludge.  During the first stage, a biological mass grows, forms flakes and is continually re‑circulated and put in contact with organic matter, always with the presence of oxygen (aerobic).  The activated sludge process is strictly biological and aerobic, in which the raw sewage and the activated sludge are mixed, agitated and aerated in units known as secondary decanters where the solid part is separated from the treated wastewater.  The settled sludge returns to the aeration tank or is removed for specific treatment.

Sewage treatment in the Regional systems will vary according to the particularities of each area.  In the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo State, treatment consists largely of stabilization ponds where the organic matter is treated and discharged to receiving waters.  There are 392402 secondary treatment facilities in the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo State that have treatment capacity of approximately 13.013.7 cubic meters of sewage per second.

The majority of sewage collected in the coastal region receives treatment and disinfection and is then discharged into rivers and into the Atlantic Ocean through our ocean outfalls.  We have 7572 sewage treatment facilities in the coastal region.

49


Our sewage collection system is currently not sufficiently extensive to transport all sewage collected by us to our treatment facilities.  As a result, a portion of the sewage collected by us is discharged untreated into receiving waters.  We are a party to a number of legal proceedings related to environmental matters.  See “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”  In addition, our capital expenditure program includes projects to increase the amount of sewage that we treat.  See “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditure Program” and “4.B Business Overview—Government Regulation—Environmental Regulation—Sewage Requirements.”

Sludge Disposal

InThe creation of sludge is inherent to the São Paulo metropolitan region, the treatment process used by most treatment facilities is the activated sludge process, where there is a liquid phase and a solid phase which generates sludge.sanitation cycle.  The activated sludge process was developed in England in 1914.  It is widely used for the treatment of householdwater and industrial sewage.  The work consistssewage produces residue which needs to be disposed of a system in which a biological mass grows, forms flakes, is continually re-circulated and put in contact with organic matter, always with the presence of oxygen (aerobic).  The activated sludge process is strictly biological and aerobic, in which the raw sewage and the activated sludge are mixed, agitated and aerated in units known as secondary decanters where the solid partis separated from the treated wastewater.  The settled sludge returnsappropriately to prevent harm to the aeration tank or is removed for specific treatment.


environment.  Sludge removed from the primary and secondary treatment processesprocess typically contains water and a very small proportion of solids.  We use filter presses, belt presses, drying beds and centrifugation machines to abstract the water from the sludge.

Sludge generated in our sanitation activities is disposed of in landfill in conformity with applicable law. Since landfills have low available capacity throughout the State of São Paulo, we are seeking other alternatives to disposal in order to reduce the total volume deposited in landfills. Amongst other proposed techniques, we plan to incinerate and compost sludge, which would produce energy and soil for agricultural use as by products, respectively.

In 2011,2013, under the partnership with Fapesp (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), we produced 46,450 tonsaim to encourage the use of sludge-dry base,sludge generated in our water treatment processes to cover landfills, the use of which 45,595 tons were discharged into landfills.  The remaining portion of the sludge-dry base was used as fertilizer in forestsludge from sewage treatment processes to recover degraded areas and agriculture projects, fuel development and concrete manufacturing.using it for civil construction projects.

Sludge disposal must comply with State and Federal law requirements, such as Resolution No. 375 of August 29, 2006 of the CONAMA, Federal Law No. 12,305/2010, Federal Decree No. 7,404/2010, State Law No. 12,300/2006 and State Decree No. 54,645/2009.

Principal Markets in Which We Operate

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we operated water and sewage systems in 363 of the 645 municipalities in the State of São Paulo.Paulo as well as sewage systems in 362 of them.  In addition, we currently supply water on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and the municipality of Sumaré with an urban population of approximately 3.73.5 million.

The following table provides a breakdown of gross revenues from water supply and sewage services by geographic market for the periods indicated.

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

(in millions of R$)

(in millions of R$)

São Paulo metropolitan region

5,280.8

5,699.6

6,144.7

6,625.0

6,144.7

5,699.6

Regional systems

1,764.6

1,956.3

2,165.4

2,309.7

2,165.4

1,956.3

Total

7,045.4

7,655.9

8,310.1

8,934.7

8,310.1

7,655.9

 

The following table provides a breakdown of gross revenues from water supply and sewage services by category of activity for the periods indicated.

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

(in millions of R$)

(in millions of R$)

Water supply

4,104.3

4,427.4

4,610.2

4,947.9

4,610.2

4,257.2

Sewage services

3,131.9

3,398.7

3,699.9

3,986.8

3,699.9

3,398.7

Adjustment to IFRS – revenue recognition (wholesale)

(190.8)

(170.2)

-

Total

7,045.4

7,655.9

8,310.1

8,934.7

8,310.1

7,655.9

 

50


Competition

We believe there are at least two reasons behind a possible increase in our participation in the domestic sanitation market.  In the State of São Paulo, there are approximately 274277 municipalities that operate their own water and sewage systems and that collectively have a total population of approximately 1313.5 million, or approximately 33%31% of the population of the State of São Paulo, excluding the population of the municipalities to which we provide water services on a wholesale basis.  Given our scale, we are well positioned to capture opportunities in these municipalities.  In comparison to the companies providing water and sewage services outside the State of São Paulo, we believe we have technological advantages compared to other water and sewage services providers, which should result in our competitively advantageous position in regions outside the State of São Paulo.

The competition for municipal concessions arisearises mainly from the municipalities, as they may resume the water and sewage services that were granted to us and start providing these services directly to the local population.  In this case, the municipal governments would be required to indemnify us for the unamortized portion of our investment.  See “—Business Overview—Our Operations—Concessions.”  In the past, municipal governments have terminated our concessions agreements before the expiration date.  Furthermore, municipal governments have tried to expropriate our assets in an attempt to resume the provision of water and sewage services to local populations.  See “Item 8.A. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”  We negotiate expired concession agreements and concession agreements close to be expiredexpiration with the municipalities in an attempt tomaintain our existing areas of operations.  In the State of São Paulo we face competition from private and municipal water and sewage service providers.


In recent years, we have also experienced an increasing level of competition in the market of water supply to large customers.  Several large industrial customers located in municipalities served by us use their own wells to supply themselves with water.  In addition, competition for the disposal of non-residential,non‑residential, commercial and industrial sludge in the São Paulo metropolitan region has increased in recent years as private companies offer stand-alonestand‑alone solutions inside the facilities of their customers.  We have also established new tariff schedules for commercial and industrial customers in order to assist us in retaining these customers.  For this group of customers, we have a special authorization from ARSESP to establish different tarifftariffs than the ones that agency establishes for regular consumers.

Billing Procedures

The procedure for billing and payment of our water and sewage services is basicallylargely the same for all customer categories.  Water and sewage bills are based upon water usage determined by monthly water meter readings.  Larger customers, however, have their meters read every 15 days to avoid non-physical lossesnon‑physical loss resulting from faulty water meters.  Sewage billing is included as part of the water bill and is based on the water meter reading.

The most partmajority of the bills for water and sewage services are delivered to our customers in person, mainly through one of our employees or through independent contractors who are also responsible for reading water meters.  The remainder, by judicial determination, is sent by mail.  Water and sewage bills can be paid at some banks and other locations in the State of São Paulo.  These funds are paid over to us after deducting average banking fees ranging from R$0.29 to R$1.15 per transaction for collection and remittance of these payments.

Customers must pay their water and sewage bills by the due date if they wish to avoid paying a fine.  We generally charge a penalty fee and interest on late bill payments.  In 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, we received payment of 94.7%, 95.5%94.8% and 94.8%95.5%, respectively, of the amount billed to our retail customers, and 93.9%95.5%, 95.5%94.7% and 94.7%94.4%, respectively, of the amount billed to those customers other than State entities, within 30 days after the due date.  In 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, we received 110.1%100.7%, 97.1%96.0% and 96.0%97.1%, respectively, of the amount billed to the State entities.  Amounts in excess of 100.0% reflect our recovery of amounts billed in prior years.  With respect to wholesale supply, in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, we received payment of 68.7%50.1%, 58.3%54.7% and 54.7%58.3%, respectively, of the amount billed within 30 days.

We monitor water meter readings by use of hand-heldhand‑held computers and transmitters.  The system allows the meter reader to input the gauge levels on the meters into the computer and automatically print the bill for the customer.  The hand-heldhand‑held computer tracks water consumption usage at each metered location and prepares bills based on actual meter readings.  Part of the water meter monitoring for billing purposes is carried out by our own personnel, trained and supervised by us, and part of it is carried out by third-partythird‑party contractors that employ and train their own personnel whose training we supervise.

51


Tariffs

Tariff adjustments follow the guidelines established by the Basic Sanitation Law and the ARSESP.  The guidelines also establish procedural steps and the terms for the annual adjustments.  The adjustments have to be announced 30 days prior to the effective date of the new tariffs, which occurtake effect in September and last for a period of at least 12 months.

Tariffs have historically been adjusted once a year and for periods of at least 12 months.  We increased our tariffs for water and sewage services by 6.8%, 9.0% and 6.7% in August 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.  On September 2007, tariffs rose by 4.12%, except for water supply and sewage collection tariffs for consumption of more than 20 cubic meters in non-residential categories, which were adjusted by the cumulative inflation from August 2006 to July 2007 in the consumer price index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo), or IPCA, index published by IBGE, which came to 3.74%.

See “—Government Regulation—Tariff Regulation in the State of São Paulo” for additional information regarding our tariffs.

With the publication of the Basic Sanitation Law, the regulation of basic sanitation services, including tariff regulation, became the responsibility of an independent regulator.  To exercise this assignment, the State of São Paulo created the ARSESP, which regulates and supervises the services we provide to the State and also withinto the municipalities that have agreed to its jurisdiction through a cooperation agreement entered into by that municipality.


In regards to municipalities that have not explicitly selected the ARSESP as their regulator, the Basic Sanitation Law admitsallows the possibility of that municipality creatingto create other regulatory agencies of their own.  In 2007, the municipality of Lins decided to create its own regulatory authority, although havingit revised this decision in 2010, transferring to ARSESP the regulation of the water activities performed in Lins, including for the setting of tariffs.  The municipality of Lins has reserved, however, the power to ultimately approve the tariff set by the ARSESP.  In 2011, theThe municipalities in which the hydrographic basins of the rivers Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí rivers are located have created a consortium for the regulation and supervision of our activities in that area.area in 2011.  We are currently involved in legal proceedings in which this consortium is claiming that it has jurisdiction over our activities in the municipality of Piracaia and that ARSESP has no right to regulate our activities or set tariffs in the municipality.  We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or how it may impact our business.  See "Government“Government Regulation—Tariff Regulation in the State of São Paulo "Paulo” for additional information.

As of the date of this annual report, the ARSESP applied the adjustment formula for our tariffs that we established on August 29, 2003. This adjustment was developed to better reflect changes in our cost structure.  According to this formula, the cost components of the Tariffs Adjustment Index, or IRT, are separated into two parts (“Part A” and “Part B”), where “Part A” encompasses all costs related to energy, water and sewage treatment materials; federal, state and local taxes; and financial compensation due to use of water resources.  “Part B” encompasses all other costs and expenses.  “Part B” relates to the difference between the gross operating revenue and the value of “Part A” for the same period.  The adjustment of “Part A” is based on the effective cost variation observed in its components during the preceding 12-month period.  “Part B” is adjusted by the IPCA index.  The adjustment to the formula used by the ARSESP replaced the variable gross operating revenue for the variable cost of reference. 

In September 2008, we adjusted our tariffs by 5.10% pursuant to the ARSESP’s authorization.  In August 2009, the ARSESP approved a 4.43% adjustment for our water and sewage tariffs, starting on September 11, 2009.  In August 2010, the ARSESP approved a 4.05% adjustment for our water and sewage tariffs, starting on September 11, 2010.  In 2012 and 2011, we readjusted our prices inby 5.15% and 6.83%, starting on September 11, 2011.  This adjustment was2012 and on September 11, 2011, respectively. On April 22, 2013, ARSESP approved a revision to tariff index to a rate of 2.3509% to be applied linearly on tariffs. These adjustments were valid for all municipalities served by us, except for the municipalities of São Bernardo do Campo, Lins and Magda, which have different rules and readjustment dates.  The tariffs in the municipality of São Bernardo do Campo are adjusted pursuant to a different methodology due to the difference between the tariffs charged in that municipality when we assumed the service and the tariffs we were charging in other metropolitan municipalities we serve.  The adjustments in São Bernardo do Campo arewere set so that in September 2012 the tariff charged in this municipality and the tariff charged in the other municipalities of the region will bebecame the same.  With respect to the municipality of Lins, our tariff is adjusted in January according to the variation of the IPCA for the last twelve-monthtwelve‑month period ended November 30.  In regards to Magda, adjustments are expected to be made by 2015.

Regarding the tariff revision process, led by ARSESP, it was agreed that we should have delivered a proposal of a new tariff structure by the end of April, 2013. However, we have requested that the deadline be extended a year and we still cannot say whether this request will be accepted by the regulator. Until the new tariff structure we propose is approved by the ARSESP, we will continue to use our current tariff structure.  As such, we currently divide tariffs into two categories:  residential and non-residential.non‑residential.  The residential category is subdivided into standard residential, residential social andfavela(shantytowns).  The residential social tariffs apply to residences of low-incomelow‑income families, residences of persons unemployed for up to 12 months and collective living residences.  Thefavelatariffs apply to residences in shantytowns characterized by a lack of urban infrastructure.  The latter two sub-categoriessub‑categories were instituted to assist lower-incomelower‑income customers by providing lower tariffs for consumption.  The non-residentialnon‑residential category consists of:  (i) commercial, industrial and public customers; (ii) “not-for-profit””not‑for‑profit” entities that pay 50.0% of the prevailing non-residentialnon‑residential tariff;  (iii) government entities that have entered into a water loss reduction agreement with us and pay 75.0% of the prevailing non-residentialnon‑residential tariff; and (iv) public entities that have entered into program agreements, for municipalities with a population of up to 30,000 and with half or more classified according to their degree of social vulnerability by the Social Vulnerability Index of São Paulo (Índice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social), or IPVS, 5 and 6, of the SEADE, obtained through the analysis of the 2000 Census figures, and start to receive tariff benefits, in accordance with our normative ruling, for the category of public use, atthe municipality level.  The tariffs are equal to those offered to the commercial/entity of social assistance and that corresponds to 50.0% of the public tariffs without contractual provisions referred to in item (iv) above.

52


We established a new tariff schedule, effective May 2002, for commercial and industrial customers that consume at least 5,000 cubic meters of water per month and that enter into fixed demand agreements (take-or-pay)(take‑or‑pay) with us for at least one-yearone‑year terms.  In October 2007, the minimum volume for entering into these agreements was reduced from 5,000 cubic meters per month to 3,000 cubic meters per month.  We believe this tariff schedule will help prevent our commercial and industrial customers from switching to the use of private wells.  Since 2008, we have been authorized by the ARSESP to establish tariffs for non-residentialnon‑residential customers, such as industrial and commercial customers, that consume more than 3,000 cubic meters per month, with a maximum tariff equal to the tariffs applicable to non-residentialnon‑residential customers that consume more than 50 cubic meters per month.  In 2010, the ARSESP authorized a reduction in the minimum volume ofconsumption for customers that enter into demand agreements with us to a minimum of 500 cubic meters per month.


We establish separate tariff schedules for our services in each of the São Paulo metropolitan regions and each of the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo State and coastal regions which comprise our Regional systems.  Each tariff schedule incorporates regional cross-subsidies,cross‑subsidies, taking into account the customers’ type and volume of consumption.  Tariffs paid by customers with high monthly water consumption rates exceed our costs of providing water service.  We use the excess tariff billed to high-volumehigh‑volume customers to compensate for the lower tariffs paid by low-volumelow‑volume customers.  Similarly, tariffs for non-residentialnon‑residential customers are established at levels that subsidize residential customers.  In addition, the tariffs for the São Paulo metropolitan region generally are higher than tariffs in the countrysideinterior region of São Paulo State and coastal regions.

Sewage charges in each region are fixed and are based on the same volume of water charged.  In the São Paulo metropolitan region and the coastal region, the sewage tariffs equal the water tariffs.  In the countrysideinterior São Paulo State region, sewage tariffs are approximately 20.0% lower than water tariffs.  Wholesale water rates are the same for all municipalities served.  We also make available sewage treatment services to those municipalities in line with the applicable contracts and tariffs.  In addition, various industrial customers pay an additional sewage charge, depending on the characteristics of the sewage they produce.

Each category and class of customer pays tariffs according to the volume of water consumed.  The tariff paid by a certain category and class of customer increases progressively according to the increase in the volume of water consumed.  The following table sets forth the water and sewage services tariffs by (i) customer category and class and (ii) volume of water consumed, charged in cubic meters during the years and period stated in the São Paulo metropolitan region.

 

As of December 31,

Customer Category Consumption

2013(5)

2012(4)

2011(3)

2010(2)

Residential

 

 

 

 

Standard Residential:

 

 

 

 

0‑10(1)

1.63

1.59

1.52

1.42

11‑20

2.55

2.49

2.37

1.22

21‑50

6.37

6.22

5.92

5.54

Above 50

7.02

6.86

6.52

6.10

Social:

 

 

 

 

0‑10(1)

0.55

0.54

0.51

0.48

11‑20

0.96

0.94

0.89

0.83

21‑30

3.37

3.29

3.13

2.93

31‑50

4.82

4.71

4.48

4.19

Above 50

5.32

5.20

4.95

4.63

Favela (shantytown):

 

 

 

 

0‑10(1)

0.42

0.41

0.39

0.37

11‑20

0.48

0.47

0.45

0.42

21‑30

1.59

1.55

1.47

1.38

31‑50

4.82

4.71

4.48

4.19

Above 50

5.32

5.20

4.95

4.63

 

53


 

As of December 31,

Customer Category Consumption

2009(2)

2010(3)

2011(4)

Residential

 

 

 

Standard Residential:

 

 

 

0-10(1)

1.36

1.42

1.52

11-20

2.13

1.22

2.37

21-50

5.32

5.54

5.92

Above 50

5.86

6.10

6.52

Social:

 

 

 

0-10(1)

0.46

0.48

0.51

11-20

0.80

0.83

0.89

21-30

2.82

2.93

3.13

31-50

4.03

4.19

4.48

Above 50

4.45

4.63

4.95

Favela (shantytown):

 

 

 

0-10(1)

0.35

0.37

0.39

11-20

0.40

0.42

0.45

21-30

1.33

1.38

1.47

31-50

4.03

4.19

4.48

Above 50

4.45

4.63

4.95

 

 

 

 

Non‑Residential

 

 

 

Commercial/Industrial/Governmental:

 

 

 

0-10(1)

2.74

2.85

3.04

11-20

5.32

5.54

5.92

21-50

10.21

10.62

11.35

Above 50

10.63

11.06

11.82

Social Welfare Entities:

 

 

 

0-10(1)

1.37

1.42

1.52

11-20

2.67

2.78

2.97

21-50

5.13

5.34

5.70

Above 50

5.31

5.53

5.91

Government entities that employ the Rational Use of the Water Program (Programa de Uso Racional da Água), or PURA, with reduction agreement:

 

 

 

0-10(1)

2.05

2.14

2.28

11-20

3.99

4.15

4.43

21-50

7.67

7.98

8.53

Above 50

7.97

8.29

8.86

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

Customer Category Consumption

2013(5)

2012(4)

2011(3)

2010(2)

Non-Residential

 

 

 

 

Commercial/Industrial/Governmental:

 

 

 

 

0-10(1)

3.28

3.20

3.04

2.85

11-20

6.37

6.22

5.92

5.54

21-50

12.21

11.93

11.35

10.62

Above 50

12.72

12.43

11.82

11.06

Social Welfare Entities:

 

 

 

 

0-10(1)

1.64

1.60

1.52

1.42

11-20

3.19

3.12

2.97

2.78

21-50

6.13

5.99

5.70

5.34

Above 50

6.36

6.21

5.91

5.53

Government entities that employ the Rational Use of Water Program (Programa de Uso Racional da Água), or PURA, with reduction agreement:

 

 

 

 

0-10(1)

2.45

2.40

2.28

2.14

11-20

4.77

4.66

4.43

4.15

21-50

9.18

8.97

8.53

7.98

Above 50

9.54

9.32

8.86

8.29

______________

(1)    The minimum volume charged is for ten cubic meters per month.

(2)From September 11, 2009 to September 10, 2010.

(3)    From September 11, 2010 to September 10, 2011.

(3)From September 11, 2011 to September 10, 2012.

(4)    SinceFrom September 11, 2011.2012 to April 21, 2013.


(5)   Since April 22, 2013.

Both in 2010In 2012, 2011 and 2011,2010, the average tariff calculated for the Regional systems was approximately 30% below the average tariff of the São Paulo metropolitan region.

RegardingThe Basic Sanitation Law requires states to establish independent regulators with the new tariff structureresponsibility of monitoring basic sanitation services and regulating tariffs. Federal law No. 11,445/07 and São Paulo State Law No. 1,025/07 established the ARSESP, which regulates and supervises the basic sanitation services that we provide in municipalities that have agreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction.  For the municipalities that have not yet agreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction for which we currently provide basic sanitation services, we determine tariffs based on State Decree 41,446/96. ARSESP aims to implement, since 2008 it has been developing new concepts that might be included inproposed or enacted a number of regulatory changes, including the following:

·In2008, the tariff structure and adjustment formula but it has so far regulatedwas reviewed.In 2009, ARSESP opened the methodology for tariff revisions for public discussion and hearings. In 2010, ARSESP published Resolution No. 156.  This resolution established the methodology and general criteria for the valuation of our regulatory asset base to be used for purposes of tariff structurereview processes and adjustments according to the same structureauditing. During 2011 and adjustment formula that we ordinarily follow. 

On July 22, 2009, the2012 ARSESP released a Technical Note (Nota Técnica)held further public consultations regarding the methodology for the tariff adjustment processrevisions, which was finally specified and submitted itdisclosed in April 2012.  In November 2012, ARSESP published a preliminary technical note for public comments.  On August 12, 2009, the ARSESP informed that the new methodology would not be applied for the 2009 adjustment.  The ARSESP is currently workingconsultation, proposing a preliminary initial maximum average tariff (P0) and efficiency gains factor (X), based on the development and improvementa preliminary evaluation of its new methodology and it expects to release a revised tariff structure and adjustments formulaassets held by us.  Following further public consultations, in 2012.

 In March 2011, the2013 ARSESP published two resolutions, Resolution No. 406 and Resolution No. 407.

·Resolution No. 406 sets out the following:  (i) an initial maximum average tariff review schedule(P0) and opened a public hearing for the proposed methodology for the calculation of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).  In May 2011, the ARSESP released a regulatory post-tax weighted average cost of capital of 8.06%. In October 2011, we presented to the ARSESP a detailed business plan that disclosed requested information regarding our income, expenses and capital expenditures, so that the ARSESP could set an adjustment formula for our tariffs. In January 2012, the ARSESP commenced a public consultation regarding our methodology for tariff revisions. The public consultation aims to: (i) set the initial framework for periodic tariff revisions for all municipalities we serve that are under the supervision of the ARSESP; (ii) discuss the criteria adopted to determine the cost of services, the tariff framework and the subsidies policy, among other issues; (iii) create a methodology, standards and procedures for future revisions and adjustments; and (iv) ensure the broad involvement of municipalities, concessionaires, consumers, investors and others.

In 2010, the ARSESP defined the rules to evaluate ourpreliminary asset base (Rule No. 156/2010). By August We have hired companiesvalue to conduct suchapply until the conclusion of an evaluation using this methodology and by August 2012, we will present to the ARSESP the evaluationexternal audit of our asset base, accordingresulting in a tariff revision of 2.3509%; (ii) authorizes the repayment to reposition costconsumers of the regulation and weighted bysupervision rate of 0.5% immediately after the respective usage ratioconclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in accordance with ARSESP Rule No. 156/2010, on which our regulatory remunerationthe bills in the municipalities where it will be based.  We willcharged; (iii) ARSESP also present ARSESP with a detailed business plan that will serve as a basisestablishes an annual tariffadjustment formula, to be implemented during the second tariff cycle, consisting of the IPCA variation (a consumer price index) for the final tariff methodology processperiod, adjusted by an efficiency factor designed to transfer a portion of our productivity gains to consumers, and further adjusted to reflect changes in service quality to be releaseddefined and applied as of the third year of the second tariff cycle.  According to ARSESP’s timetable the final maximum average tariff (P0) will be announced in August 2013 after the asset base value presented by us is audited.

54


·A tariff revision of to a rate of 2.3509% was implemented in April 2013 pursuant to Resolution No. 406. Additionally, we will pass an inspection fee of 0.5% to consumers immediately after the ARSESPconclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in the near future.  In September 2012, we expectbills to receivemunicipalities where it will be charged.

·Resolution No. 407 authorizes us to pass on to the ARSESP’s preliminary average tariff proposalservice bill legal charges defined by municipal legislation, which under the Program Contracts and the applicable efficiency gains factor that we willSewage and Water Supply Service Contracts must be required to includeconsidered in the tariff structure proposalrevision.

In April 2013, ARSESP passed Resolution No. 413, which effectively suspended Resolution No. 407, thereby postponing the authorization for the passing on to consumers of billing of taxes to municipalities, which prior to this Resolution had been established in Resolution No. 407. The final decision regarding Resolution No. 407 has been postponed until August 2013.

In August 2012, ARSESP published Resolution No. 346, which established the principle that the ARSESP will then request from us. By October 2012, we expect tousers should be able to propose such tariff structure, and our preliminary average tariff, efficiency gains factor and tariff structure will then be submittedcompensated for public hearing. The ARSESP estimates that a final public hearing at which our preliminary average tariff, efficiency gains factor and tariff structure will be subjected to public scrutiny will be scheduled by November 2012. The aforementioned schedule may, however, suffer alterations or be subject to delays.any interruptions in water supply.  Implementation of this regulation has been suspended pending further technical discussions.

Marketing Channels

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we were the concessionaire for the provision of water supply and collection, treatment and disposal of sewage services directly to end consumers for 363 municipalities of the State of São Paulo.  We also supply water on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and the municipality of Sumaré.region.  It is the responsibility of these municipalities to then distribute the water to end consumers.  We provide sewage services to five of these municipalities.  Because of our distribution infrastructure, end consumers to whom we offer water services on a wholesale basis cannot alternatively acquire such services directly from us.  For more information on service concessions, see “4.B. Business Overview—Wholesale Operations.”

Energy Consumption

Energy is essential to our operations, and as a result we are one of the largest users of energy in the State of São Paulo.  In the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, we used 1.76% of the total energy consumption in the State of São Paulo.  To date, we have not experienced any major disruptions in energy supply.  Any significant disruption of energy to us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We are exposed to risks associated with the provision of water and sewage services.”


Energy prices have a significant impact on our results of operations.  An average increase in energy prices of 17.6% in 2003 negatively affected our results of operations in 2004.  In 2011,2012, 44% of our total energy consumption occurred within the “free market”,market,” where we can more efficiently negotiate the supply of energy.  This energy was provided by Companhia Energética São Paulo, or CESP, pursuant to a long-termlong‑term contract expiringexpired in October 2012.  As of October 2012, we entered into long‑term contracts with AES Tiête (39%) and Tractebel Energia S.A. (61%) have already been hired to provide these services for the remainder of 2012 and until 2015.

Insurance

We maintain insurance covering, among other things, fire or other damage to our property and office buildings and third-partythird‑party liability.  We also maintain insurance coverage for directors’ and officers’ liability (D&O insurance).  We currently obtain our insurance policies by means of public bids involving major Brazilian and international insurance companies that operate in Brazil.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had paid a total aggregate amount ofR$9.36.5 million in premiums,premiums.  In addition, we paid R$1.5 million for a D&O insurance policy, covering R$2.1 million on4.4 billion in assets, third-partythird‑party liabilities and D&O insurance.  We do not have insurance coverage for business interruption risk because we do not believe that the high premiums for such insurance are justified by the low risk of major interruption of our activities.  In addition, we do not have insurance coverage for liabilities arising from water contamination or other problems involving our water supply to customers and for environmental related liabilities and damages.  We believe that we maintain insurance at levels customary in Brazil for our type of business.

55


Environmental Matters

Our environmental policy which we revised in January 2008, establishedestablishes environmental management directives that allow us to become a contributing force to environmental sustainability and excellence.  These directives are based on a systematic approach to the environment, which allowallows us to develop a plan that integratedintegrates economic, environmental and social dimensions of our work with sustainable use of natural resources.

In order to coordinate the environmental demands with the specific needs of the different places we operate, we have implemented 20 Environmental Management Centers (Núcleos de Gestão Ambiental), or NGAs.  The NGAs are closely involved in operational matters, providing decision-makingdecision‑making support at a local level and seeking to ensure that environmental guidelines are respected throughout our organization.  In this manner, they help contribute to the ongoing improvement of our environmental performance.

We have the following environmental management programs:

§

execution of a Environmental Management System, or EMS, and acquisition of ISO 14001 certification to our sewage and water treatment facilities.  We received the certifications for 50  sewage treatment facilities, including those located in the São Paulo metropolitan, countryside and coastal regions.  65 of our water treatment facilities and sewage treatment facilities have implemented the EMS, and we expect to extend it progressively to our remaining installations;

§

participation in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) and adherence to the Carbon Disclosure Project CDP Supply Chain;

§

conception and formation of the Corporate Management of Greenhouse Gas Program (Programa Corporativo de Gestão de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa·execution of an Environmental Management System, or EMS, in our water and sewage treatment stations (“WTS” and “STS”).  The EMS is present in 65 stations and we intend to expand it to 129 plants by the end of 2013.  We also expect to have it implemented in 302 WTSs and STSs by 2018.  Additionally, we pursue the ISO 14001 certification for our strategic plants.  As of December 31, 2012, we have ISO 14001 certification for 50 STSs.);  

§

the monitoring and controlling compliance with conduct adjustment terms and judicial agreements relating to the environment;

§

formation and implementation of a corporate program for maintenance and regularization of environmental licenses and of granting water usage rights;

§

the implementation of the Environmental Education Program (PEA SABESP), including over one hundred environmental education actions and projects involving the community and other stakeholders ;

§

our institutional representation in the State and National Systems of Water Resources Management, including training of company representatives to participate in councils of the National and State Systems for the Management of Water Resources (Sistemas Nacional e Estadual de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos), training of the representatives for participation in the process of establishing criteria for the charging of water usage, monitoring of water basin plans (Planos das Bacias), water bodies classification programs and the establishment or review of specific legislation on the matter;

§

the structuring of educational activities related to analyzing, managing, and communicating environmental risks; 


§implementation of the SABESP 3-Rs Program (Programa SABESP 3Rs) for the reduction, re-use and recycling of waste of administrative activities, a program involving the two largest administrative areas of our Company with plans to include all other administrative areas.

·participation in the Carbon Disclosure Project;

·conception and formation of the Corporate Management of Greenhouse Gas Program (Programa Corporativo de Gestão de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa); 

·formation and implementation of a corporate program for obtaining and maintaining environmental licenses and granting of water usage rights (Programa Corporativo de Manutenção e Obtenção do Licenciamento Ambiental); 

·the implementation of the Environmental Education Program (PEA SABESP), including over one hundred environmental education actions and projects involving the community and other stakeholders;

·management of our institutional representation in the State and National Systems of Water Resources Management, including training of company representatives to participate in councils of the National and State Systems for the Management of Water Resources (Sistemas Nacional e Estadual de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos e Meio Ambiente), training of the representatives for participation in the process of establishing criteria for the charging of water usage, monitoring of water basin plans (Planos das Bacias), water bodies classification programs and the establishment or review of specific legislation on the matter;  and

·implementation of the SABESP 3‑Rs Program (Programa SABESP 3Rs) for the reduction, re‑use and recycling of waste of administrative activities, a program involving the two largest administrative areas of our Company with plans to include all other administrative areas.

In addition to corporate environmentalmanagement initiatives,, since 2008, we have launched several projects to benefit the environment by engaging the community and third parties with non-governmentalnon‑governmental organizations, including:

§·        Oil Recycling Program (Programa(Programa de Reciclagem de Óleo de FrituraFritura);), or PROL;

§56One million Trees in Cantareira (Programa “Um Milhão de Árvores no Cantareira”); 


§Green Hug (Abraço Verde);  

§Community Gardens (Hortas Comunitárias); 

§·        Program of Lectures on Environmental Management (Ciclos(Ciclos de Conferências de Gestão Ambiental)Ambiental);

§·        Supporters of Sustainability (Audiê(Audiências de Sustentabilidade)Sustentabilidade);

§·        ‘Nossa Guarapiranga’ Project (Programa (Programa Nossa Guarapiranga)Guarapiranga);

§Water park in Campos do Jordão (Parque Lagoinha); 

§·        Environmental Support Actions (ecomobilizaç(ecomobilizações);

§·        First Green Building (Primeiro(Primeiro Predio Verde Certificado);

§·        Recycling programs;

§·        RadioReforestation Program ‘My Environment’ (Meu Ambiente); and Seedling Plantation Program

§Partnership with Abrafati in the a project for the cleaning of green areas (Pintou Limpeza);

§·        Green Post (Ecoposto Sabesp)(Ecoposto Sabesp);

§·        Maintaining of environmentally protected areas;

§·        Green Life Program (Programa(Programa Verde Vida)Vida); and

§Plant a Tree, a Child Is Born (Nasce uma Criança Plante uma Árvore); 

§Sustainable purchasing policy;

§Reuse of scrap material from construction;

§·        Support and sponsoring toof environmentally important projects and initiatives;

§Cyan Bank (Banco Cyan)program for the reduction of water consumption.

Climate Change Regulations:  Reduction of Greenhouse Gases (GHG)

We are required to comply with laws and regulations related to climate change, including international agreements and treaties to which Brazil is a signatory.

The São Paulo State Climate Change Policy (Law No. 13,798), enacted on November 9, 2009, seeks to reduce global emissions of carbon dioxide by 20.0% by 2020 compared with 2005 levels.  Brazil’s Climate Change Policy (Law No. 12,187), enacted on December 29, 2009, establishes a voluntary national commitment to reduce Brazil’s currently projected GHG emissions for 2020 by a percentage between 36.1% and 38.9%.  If legislation requires us to reduce our emissions, we may do so by transforming biogas from the treatment of sewage into energy, for example, which may lead to potential economic gains.

We have begun significant initiatives, such as the corporate program for water loss reduction and the implementation of small hydroelectric power plants, to reduce GHG emissions during the coming years.  We recently launched the Aquapolo project, the fifth largest project in the world to use reclaimed waterproduction for industrial purposes, which uses treated sewage as input.  This project, capable of producing 1,000 liters per second (Ps) of reclaimed water, will increase the supply of treated water for the São Paulo metropolitan region and may potentially reduce GHG emissions.  Our investments in the Aquapolo project amounted to approximately R$252 million.  We created our inventory of GHG emissions for the year 2008 and are verifying our inventoriesin 2012 updated this inventory for the years 2009 and 2010. 2010Moreover, we are developing a management program for GHG emissions. The program includes studies of impacts and risks related to climate change and the study of potential scenarios based on our emissions of GHG.


At this point, it is still not possible to predict if climate change policies will provide opportunities or generate new costs for us.  Reducing our emissions of carbon dioxide will involve costs and expenses inrelated to implementing more stringent control mechanisms, adopting pollution prevention measures and actions to minimize the generation of GHGs.  We may not receive financial incentives to offset all or part of these costs.  In addition, if limitations in GHG emissions affect our supply chain and increase our costs, we may not be able to pass on these costs to our end consumers.  See “4.B.  Business Overview—Tariffs.”

Regulation of GHG emissions could also benefit us in the short term, since we may be able to obtain subsidies, financial investments and tax incentives for projects to protect and restore water sources, conserve water, treat sewage, conserve energy, increase energy efficiency, and promote self-generatedself‑generated energy, among other projects that seek to reduce the impact of climate change.

57


Carbon Disclosure Project

§Carbon Disclosure Project Investors·Carbon Disclosure Project Investors.  We participate in the Carbon Disclosure Project, a global initiative focused on the financial risks related to climate change.  Through this project, main international institutional investors ask the world’s largest companies to demonstrate that they are managing carbon effectively.  We have received and responded to the project’s questionnaires since 2006.  The companies that opt to have their answers disclosed to the public, as in the Carbon Disclosure Project – CDP, a global initiative focused on the financial risks related to climate change.  Through this project, main international institutional investors ask the world’s largest companies to demonstrate that they are managing carbon effectively.  We have received and responded the project’s questionnaires since 2006.  The companies that opt to have their answers disclosed to the public, such as our case, have their answers published in an international website of public interest.  The questionnaire asks mainly questions related to the aspects of climate change and corporate governance, the physical, financial and regulatory effects of climate change, and opportunities that affect or could positively or negatively affect us.

§

Carbon Disclosure Project Supply ChainOn December 2010, we adhered to the Carbon Disclosure Project – CDP Supply Chain 2011.  The project seeks to encourage the adoption of a standard methodology by our main suppliers of goods and services to measure risks related to climate change and GHG emissions. We have invited 97 of our main suppliers of goods and services to join the CDP Supply Chain, from which 20% have joined the project.

·Carbon Disclosure Project Supply Chain.  On December 2010, we adhered to the Carbon Disclosure Project Supply Chain 2011.  We only participated in this program in 2011 due to the low support of suppliers.

Physical Effects of Climate Change

Since our financial performance is closely linked to climate patterns that influence in the availability of water (in terms of quantity and quality of water resources), extreme weather conditions may adversely affect our business and operations.  If long-termlong‑term climate change causes significant alterations in environmental conditions, such as an increase in the frequency of extreme weather conditions, this could affect the quality and quantity of water available for abstraction, treatment and supply, affecting the costs of services and tariffs.

An increase in heavy rainfall can impact water quality and the regular operation of water sources, including abstraction of water from our dams, through increased soil erosion, silting, pollution and eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems.  In addition, increased flows of rainwater into sewage systems may overwhelm the capacity of sewage treatment plants.  We may need to build larger reservoirs, since it is not feasible to increase the size of our existing reservoirs, or increase operational capacity by further automating our existing equipment.  To increase automation, we would need to purchase and operate tools to measure dam levels and volumes, river output and the rain in hydrographic basins, create mathematical models for real time operations, and train technicians to operate these systems.  As an alternative, we may need to implement new production systems.

In the case of prolonged periods of drought, for example, reduced water levels in dams can cause an increase in the concentration of plant matter by increasing eutrophication and, consequently, increasing water treatment costs and operational complexity.  In addition, prolonged periods of drought in watersheds such as the São Paulo metropolitan region, where most of our production is concentrated, may result in the growth of vegetation in the reservoir flooding areas, which can impact water quality due to the accumulation of organic matter.  In such cases our production costs may increase, affecting our financial margins and the quality of water we produce.  Droughts also lower reservoir levels available for hydroelectric plants, which may lead to power shortages, particularly since hydroelectric power accounts for most of Brazil’s electric energy supply.  A lack of rainwater could lead to instability in domestic water supplies and in sewage collection and treatment services, which could damage our reputation.  In addition, because we are one of the largest consumers of electricity in the State of São Paulo, a potential increase in electricity tariffs due to a shortage of hydroelectric power could have a significant economic impact on us.


We are also the concessionaire for water and sewage services for all the coastal municipalities of the State of São Paulo.  A rise in the sea level would result in increased salinity of inland water supplies, which may affect water treatment in these areas.  Rising sea levels may also increase infiltration rates and alter the runoff regime of the sewage systems, which may affect the sanitary system.

Extreme climate changes may also affect the extraction, production and transportation of the materials necessary for our operations, such as water treatment materials, and may lead to an increase in the cost of these materials.  A rise in air temperature could also increase consumer demand for water, increasing the need to expand both water supply and sewage treatment.

58


See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—The enactment of newNew laws and regulations relating to climate change and the changechanges in existing regulation, as well as the physical effects of climate change, may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on us”us.”

Government Regulation

Basic sanitation services in Brazil are subject to an extensive federal, state and local legislation and regulation that, among other matters, regulates:

§the granting of concessions to provide water and sewage services;
§the development of public private partnerships;
§the need of a public bidding process for the appointment of private water and sewage services providers;
§the need of setting up an agreement for the appointment of public water and sewage services providers;
§the joint management of public services through cooperation, allowing for a program agreement without the need for a public bidding process for the service provider, subject to the condition that the planning, execution and monitoring activities are not executed by the service provider;
§minimum requirements for water and sewage services;
§water usage;
§water quality and environmental protection; and
§governmental restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness applicable to state-controlled

·the granting of concessions to provide water and sewage services;

·the development of public private partnerships;

·the need of a public bidding process for the appointment of private water and sewage services providers;

·the need of setting up an agreement for the appointment of public water and sewage services providers;

·the joint management of public services through cooperation, allowing for a program agreement without the need for a public bidding process for the service provider, subject to the condition that the planning, execution and monitoring activities are not executed by the service provider;

·minimum requirements for water and sewage services;

·water usage;

·water quality and environmental protection; and

·governmental restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness applicable to state‑controlled companies.

General

Pursuant to Article 23 of the Brazilian Constitution, water and sewage services are the joint responsibility of the federal government, the states and the municipalities.  Article 216 of the Constitution of the State of São Paulo provides that, by law, the State must provide the conditions for efficient management and adequate expansion of water and sewage services rendered by its agencies and State-controlledState‑controlled companies or any other concessionaire under its control.  State law authorized our formation to plan, provide and operate water and sewage services in the State and also acknowledged the autonomy of the municipalities.

Pursuant to Article 175 of the Brazilian Constitution, the rendering of public services, such as water and sewage services, is the responsibility of the applicable public authority.  However, any such public authority has the right to render these services directly or through a concession granted to a third party.

In Brazil, there are three federal legal regimes for contracting water and sewage services:  (i) public concessions, regulated by Law No. 8,987/1995, which require a prior public bidding process; (ii) administration of public services through cooperation agreements between the federal government and local public authorities at State and municipal level without the need for a public bidding process, regulated by thePublic Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law; and (iii) public-privatepublic‑private partnerships, regulated by Law No. 11,079/2004, used to grant concessions to private companies to provide public services and used in relation withto construction works associated with the provision of public services.  Until 2005, we had adopted the regime for public concessions.  Following the entry into force of the Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law, we adopted the administration of public services through cooperation agreements, which can be used alongside the other two regimes.


The Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law and the Basic Sanitation Law have caused significant impacts in the development of the state sanitation policy and the regulatory structuring of the industry.

Because we are the legal concessionaire for the State of São Paulo for water and sewage services, serving approximately 59% of the State’s population and providing sanitation services through concession agreements, the Consortium Law affects us on the expiry of our concession agreements entered into in the 1970s when the BrazilianSanitation Plan (Plano Nacional de Saneamento), or PLANASA, was created.  The Consortium Law has caused important changes in the relationship among municipalities, states and public sanitation service providers, most notably in mixed capital companies, such as us, because of the implementation of the program agreements as a substitute for concession agreements.

59


In addition, the Basic Sanitation Law in its role as a general guideline for the development of the Brazilian sanitation industry, addresses the conditions for the delegation of water and sewage services, the exercise of ownership by the granting authority and the regulatory conditions for the industry.  The Basic Sanitation Law also provides for a significant amendment to Article 42 of the Concessions Law, which establishes the termination of concessions prior to the expiration date and the reversibility conditions for unamortized assets.  The amendment requires that the service provider be compensated for unamortized assets, prioritizing an agreement between the parties setting out the criteria for calculation and payments of indemnity.

The Basic Sanitation Law

On January 5, 2007, the Federal Law No. 11,445, or the Basic Sanitation Law, was enacted, establishing nationwide guidelines for basic sanitation and seeking to create appropriate solutions for the situation of each state and municipality, facilitating the technical cooperation between the state and municipalities.  In addition, the federal government will enact its public policy to facilitate access to financing alternatives that are compatible with the costs and terms of the sanitation industry, in substitution of the PLANASA model.  On June 21, 2010, the federal government enacted Federal Decree No. 7,217, regulating the Basic Sanitation Law.  See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business—We cannot anticipateThe Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the effects that further developmentsprocess of implementation and interpretation, and doubts remain as to its full impact on the industry.  ARSESP, the regulator, has the function to implement regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law within the State of São Paulo, and its interpretation willis in the process of reviewing, implementing and proposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage regulations, including potentially significant changes to the tariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of the changes that are currently proposed, may have an adverse effect on the basic sanitation industry in Brazil and on us.our business.

The Basic Sanitation Law establishes the following principles for basic sanitation public services:  universalization, integrality, efficiency and economic sustainability, transparency of actions, social control and integration of infrastructure and services with the management of water resources.  It does not define the ownership of the sanitation services, but establishes the minimum liability for the exercise of ownership, such as the development of the sanitation plan, definition of the person responsible for regulation and control and, establishment of the rights and obligations of the users and of the social control mechanisms.  It also defines the regionalized performance of the services (i.e., one single provider serves two or more owners, for which there may be one plan for the combination of services).

In addition, the Basic Sanitation Law defines the guidelines and objectives of the federal basic sanitation policy to be observed when securing public funds generated or operated by agencies or entities of the federal government, and foresees the possibility of having subsidies as an instrument of social policy to ensure access to basic sanitation services to everyone, particularly the low-incomelow‑income population.  The subsidies may be granted either directly, through tariffs or indirectly, depending on the characteristics of the beneficiaries and on the source of the funds.

Furthermore, the Basic Sanitation Law also provides that the sanitation services may be interrupted by the service provider, in the event of default of payment of the tariffs by the customer, among other reasons, after written notice, as long as minimum health requirements are met.

The Basic Sanitation Law also establishes the criteria for the reversal of assets at the time of termination of the agreement and with regard to the concessions, such as those that have expired or are effective for an indefinite term, or those that were not formalized by an agreement.  In addition, the Basic Sanitation Law provides the basis for calculating the amount of an indemnity due, which must be calculated by a specialized institution chosen by mutual agreement between the parties.


Pursuant to the Basic Sanitation Law, the parties of the concession may enter into an agreement with respect to the payment of the indemnification due to the concessionaire.  However, in the absence of an agreement, the Basic Sanitation Law establishes that the indemnification must be paid in no more than four equal and successive annualinstallments, with the first installment payable by the last business day of the fiscal year in which the assets are reversed.

60


Tariff Regulation in the State of São Paulo

The tariffs for our services are subject to Federal and State regulation.

On December 16, 1996, the governor of the State of São Paulo issued a decree which approved the existing tariff system and allowed us to continue to set our own tariffs.  We used to set our tariffs based on the general objectives of maintaining our financial condition and preserving “social equality” in terms of the provision of water and sewage services to the population while providing a return on investment.  The governor’s decree also directs us to apply the following criteria in determining our tariffs:

§·        category of use;

§·        capacity of the water meter;

§·        characteristics of consumption;

§·        volume consumed;

§·        fixed and floating costs;

§·        seasonal variations of consumption; and

§·        social and economic conditions of residential customers.

With the enactment of the Basic Sanitation Law and Federal Consortium Law, we are prohibited from planning, overseeing and regulating services, which includes determining the tariff policy to be adopted.  Such activities are to be exercised by the owner of the concession.  Other than the responsibility for planning, the remaining activities may not be delegated.

The current tariff structure maintains different tariff schedules, depending upon whether a customer is located in the São Paulo metropolitan region or the Regional systems.  There are four levels of volume consumed for each category of customer, except for the residential social andfavelas(shantytowns).  The residential social tariffs apply to residences of low income families, residences of persons unemployed for up to 12 months and collective living residences.  The favela tariffs apply to residences in shantytowns characterized by a lack of urban infrastructure.  The latter two sub categories were instituted to assist lower income customers by providing lower tariffs for consumption.  Customers are billed on a monthly basis.  Water and sewage bills are based upon water usage determined by monthly water meter readings.  Larger customers, however, have their meters read every 15 days to avoid nonphysical lossesloss resulting from faulty water meters.  Sewage billing is included as part of the water bill and is based on the water meter reading.  We are also authorized to enter into individual contracts with certain customers, such as municipalities, to supply water or sewage services on a wholesale basis.

Before the enactment of the Basic Sanitation Law in 2007, we were subject to a federal law which limited the return on assets for water and sewage services to 12.0% per annum.  Return on our assets was calculated using operating income (before financial and certain other expenses) measured against our operational assets (property, plant and equipment and certain other assets), based on our financial statements prepared in accordance with the accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP.  The Basic Sanitation Law revoked thisrequires states to establish independent regulators with the responsibility of monitoring basic sanitation services and regulating tariffs.  Federal law No. 11,445 and extinguished this rule.  Pursuant to the Basic SanitationSão Paulo State Law tariff regulation is to be performed by an independent regulatory entity.  Municipalities can either create their own regulatory agency or delegate tariff regulation to the ARSESP.  With respect to the criteria to calculate the return on assets, on July 30, 2010,No. 1,025/07 established the ARSESP, adoptedwhich regulates and supervises the basic sanitation services that we provide in municipalities that have agreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction.  For the municipalities that have not yet agreed to come under ARSESP’s jurisdiction for which we currently provide basic sanitation services, we determine tariffs based on State Decree 41,446/96. ARSESP has proposed or enacted a newnumber of regulatory changes, including the following:

·In 2008, the tariff adjustment formula was reviewed. In 2009, ARSESP opened the methodology for the calculation of return on assets, which uses the replacement cost of the assets (assuming replacement with new assets) as a basistariff revisions for the calculation.  Although the ARSESP has proceeded with public consultations on tariff methodologydiscussion and has indicated that it will implement the new methodology by 2012, we cannot assure you when the new rules will be enacted.  Meanwhile, the ARSESP has not altered the tariff formula and has continued to apply the same methodology as in prior years.

Since 2008, the ARSESP has been developing new concepts in the tariff structure and adjustment formula.hearings. In July 30, 2010, the ARSESP published Resolution No. 156 establishing156.  This resolution established the methodology and general criteria for the definitionvaluation of our regulatory asset base in order to move forward with thebe used for purposes of tariff reviewprocess processes and to defineauditing. During 2011 and 2012 ARSESP held further public consultations regarding the initial parameters of the auditing process that the ARSESP will have to conduct pursuant to the terms of the Basic Sanitation Law.  The methodology has been defined and, in general terms, assets will be evaluated by reposition costs and weighted by the respective usage ratio.


 In March 2011, the ARSESP published the tariff review schedule and opened a public hearing for the proposed methodology for the calculation of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).  In May 2011, the ARSESP released a regulatory post-tax weighted average cost of capital of 8.06%. In October 2011, we presented to the ARSESP a detailed business plan that disclosed requested information regarding our income, expenses and capital expenditures, so that the ARSESP could set an adjustment formula for our tariffs.

 In January 2012, the ARSESP commenced a public consultation regarding our methodology for tariff revisions. Therevisions, which was finally specified anddisclosed in April 2012.  In November 2012, ARSESP published a preliminary technical note for public consultation, aims to:proposing a preliminary initial maximum average tariff (P0) and efficiency gains factor (X), based on a preliminary evaluation of assets held by us.  Following further public consultations, in March 2013 ARSESP published two resolutions, Resolution 406 and Resolution 407.

61


·Resolution No. 406 sets out the following:  (i) set thean initial framework for periodicmaximum average tariff revisions for all municipalities we serve that are under the supervision of the ARSESP; (ii) discuss the criteria adopted to determine the cost of services, the tariff framework(P0) and the subsidies policy, among other issues; (iii) create a methodology, standards and procedures for future revisions and adjustments; and (iv) ensure the broad involvement of municipalities, concessionaires, consumers, investors and others.

In 2010, the ARSESP defined the rules to evaluate ourpreliminary asset base (Rule No. 156/2010). We have hired companiesvalue to conduct suchapply until the conclusion of an evaluation using this methodology and by August 2012, we will present to the ARSESP the evaluationexternal audit of our asset base, accordingresulting in a tariff revision of 2.3509; (ii) authorizes the repayment to reposition costconsumers of the regulation and weighted bysupervision rate of 0.5% immediately after the respective usage ratioconclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in accordance with ARSESP Rule No. 156/2010, on which our regulatory remunerationthe bills in the municipalities where it will be based.  We willcharged; (iii) ARSESP also present ARSESP with a detailed business plan that will serve as a basisestablishes an annual tariff adjustment formula, to be implemented during the second tariff cycle, consisting of the IPCA variation (a consumer price index) for the final tariff methodology processperiod, adjusted by an efficiency factor designed to transfer a portion of our productivity gains to consumers, and further adjusted to reflect changes in service quality to be releaseddefined and applied as of the third year of the second tariff cycle.  According to ARSESP’s timetable the final maximum average tariff (P0) will be announced in August 2013 after the asset base value presented by us is audited.

·A tariff revision of to a rate of 2.3509% was implemented in April 2013 pursuant to Resolution No. 406. Additionally, we will pass an inspection fee of 0.5% to consumers immediately after the ARSESPconclusion of the operational adjustments necessary for the inclusion of this rate in the near future.  In September 2012, we expectbills to receivemunicipalities where it will be charged.

·Resolution No. 407 authorizes us to pass on to the ARSESP’s preliminary average tariff proposalservice bill legal charges defined by municipal legislation, which under the Program Contracts and the applicable efficiency gains factor that we willSewage and Water Supply Service Contracts must be required to includeconsidered in the tariff structure proposalrevision.

In April 2013, ARSESP passed Resolution No. 413, which effectively suspended Resolution No. 407, thereby postponing the authorization for the passing on to consumers of billing of taxes to municipalities, which prior to this Resolution had been established in Resolution No. 407. The final decision regarding Resolution No. 407 has been postponed until August 2013.

In August 2012, ARSESP published Resolution No. 346, which established the principle that the ARSESP will then request from us. By October 2012, we expect tousers should be able to propose such tariff structure, and our preliminary average tariff, efficiency gains factor and tariff structure will then be submittedcompensated for public hearing. The ARSESP estimates that a final public hearing at which our preliminary average tariff, efficiency gains factor and tariff structure will be subjected to public scrutiny will be scheduled by November 2012. The aforementioned schedule may, however, suffer alterations or be subject to delays. We cannot anticipate the additional changes that the ARSESP will implement on our tariff structure and adjustment formula or the effects that these changes will have on us.  If the changes are unfavorable to us, they could materially and adversely affect us.any interruptions in water supply.  Implementation of this regulation has been suspended pending further technical discussions.

Furthermore, since Law No. 11,445 permits municipalities to create their own regulatory agencies rather than being subjected to overview by the ARSESP, a number of municipalities created their own regulatory agencies.  The municipality of Lins, which had decided in 2007 to create its own regulatory authority, revised this decision in 2010 and transferred the regulation of the water activities performed in Lins, including the setting of tariffs, to the ARSESP.  Lins has retained, however, the power to ultimately approve the tariff set by the ARSESP.  The municipalities of São Bernardo do Campo and Magda retained the power to readjust the tariffs applied therein.  Additionally, the municipalities in which the hydrographic basins of the rivers Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí rivers are located have created a consortium for the regulation and supervision of our activities in that area. Asarea in 2011.  We are currently involved in legal proceedings in which this entityconsortium is claiming that it has recently been created, wejurisdiction over our activities in the municipality of Piracaia and that ARSESP has no right to regulate our activities or set tariffs in the municipality.  We cannot predict the outcome of this case or how it may implement regulatory changes that may affectimpact our activities. If other municipalities create new agencies, we will be subject to their regulation, supervision and limitations to our services.business.  See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We cannot anticipateThe Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the effects that further developmentsprocess of implementation and interpretation, and doubts remain as to its full impact on the industry.  ARSESP, the regulator, has the function to implement regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law within the State of São Paulo, and its interpretation willis in the process of reviewing, implementing and proposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage regulations, including potentially significant changes to the tariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of the changes that are currently proposed, may have an adverse effect on the basic sanitation industry in Brazil and on us”.our business.”

62


Consumer Relations in the State of São Paulo

PursuantIn 2011 ARSESP altered the standard contract that we are required to use in our relationships with retail customers, requiring that invoices be sent to the Basic Sanitation Law,consumer of the service rather than the owner of the property.  We estimate that this change will affect ongoing legal disputes, particularly those regarding collection procedures, as well as business discussions in general.  Since this change is still being implemented, we are not currently able to predict its impact on our business.

In 2009 the ARSESP enacted certain rules establishing (i)regarding the following:

·general terms and conditions for the services we render, (ii) thewater and sewage services;

·procedures for communication process forregarding any failure in our services; (iii) 

·penalties for deficiencies in the provision of basic sanitation services; and (iv)

·procedures for confidential treatment of our clients’customers’ private information.

We are currently evaluating the enforceability and legality of some of these rules.  Implementation of these rules started during 2011, is currently ongoing, and is expected to continue for the next few years.  The implementation of these rules will impact our commercial and operations processes, and may adversely affect us as described below and in other ways we cannot currently predict.

In particular, regarding changes to the general conditions for our services, in 2011 the ARSESP altered the standard contract that we are required to use in our relationships with retail costumers. The ARSESP changed the rule regarding the collection of water and sewage tariff, requiring that collection be directed to the consumer of our services, rather than to the owner of the served property, as used to be the case. We estimate that this change will affect ongoing legal disputes, particularly those regarding collectionprocedures, as well as business discussions in general. However, we are not currently able to predict the impact of this change on our business, as the change is still being implemented.


Regarding changes to the communication process for the reporting of failures, the ARSESP has modified the rules and standards for supervision and reporting of incidents.  We have implemented these requested changes.  Currently.Currently, part of the reporting of incidents occurs online, through the Incident Reporting System (“Sistema de Comunicação de Incidentes”) established by the ARSESP, implementing morewhich introduces greater transparency and control into our operations.

We are attentive to these regulatory changes, have been working toward meeting the ARSESP’s requirements and recommendations, and have presented technical, legal and factual reasons for any conduct that the ARSESP may find irregular.  As a result, we are subject to few regulatory infractions and to limited fines.  See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We cannot anticipateThe Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the effects that further developmentsprocess of implementation and interpretation, and doubts remain as to its full impact on the industry.”  ARSESP, the regulator, has the function of implementing regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law within the State of São Paulo, and its interpretation willis in the process of reviewing, implementing and proposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage regulations, including potentially significant changes to the tariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of the changes that are currently proposed, may have an adverse effect on the basic sanitation industry in Brazil and on us”.our business.”

Concessions

Concessions for providing water and sewage services are formalized by agreements executed between the state or municipality, as the case may be, and a concessionaire to which the performance of these services is granted in a given municipality or region.  Our concessions normally have a contractual term of up to 30 years.  However, our concessions in general can be revoked at any time if certain standards of quality and safety are not met, or in the event of default of the terms of the concession agreement.

A municipality that chooses to assume the direct control of its water and sewage services must terminate the current relationship by duly compensating the service provider.  Subsequently, the municipality will be in charge of rendering services or of conducting a public bidding process to grant the concession to potential concessionaires, including agreements with public companies directly.  Although the Constitution of the State of São Paulo determines that the relevant municipality would have to pay us for the unamortized book value of the assets related to theany concession and assume any corresponding debt, with the exclusion of any amounts that have been paid to us by the municipality, upon termination or non-renewalnon‑renewal of the concession, the payment for termination may not be effected immediately, and any termination could negatively affect our cash flows, operating results and financial situation.  The Basic Sanitation Law reduced the maximum time period for payment of indemnification in such cases to four years.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—MunicipalitiesThe municipalities may under certain circumstances, terminate our concessions before their expiration and thethey expire in certain circumstances.  The indemnification payments we receive in such cases may be inadequate to recoverless than the full value of our investments.the investments we made.

63


The Federal Concessions Law No. 8,987/1995 and the State Concessions Law No. 7,835/1992 require that the granting of a concession by the government be preceded by a public bidding process.  However, the Federal Public Bidding Law No. 8,666/1993, which establishes the rules for the public bidding process, provides that a public bidding process can be waived under certain circumstances, including in the case of services to be provided by a public entity created for such specific purpose on a date prior to the effectiveness of this law, provided that the contracted price is compatible with what is practiced in the market.  Furthermore, a provision of the Federal Public Bidding Law, as amended by the Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law, provides that the program contracted can be executed with waiver of a public bidding process.

In the majority of municipalities where we operate, the new contracts have been formalized pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Public Bidding Law that allows the public bidding process to be waived under certain circumstances.  However, dueIn addition, there are pending cases before the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding whether the right to execute concession and program agreements in the discussion over whethermetropolitan regions belongs to the State or the municipal authorities havegovernment. On February 28, 2013 the rightBrazilian Supreme Court decided a pending case on this matter related to grant rightsthe State of Rio de Janeiro.  A majority of the court held that the State and municipal governments must set up new joint entities to provideoversee the planning, regulation and auditing of basic sanitation services in municipal areas, negotiationsmetropolitan regions.  On March 6, 2013, the court ruled that this decision would come into effect after a 24-month period with respect to the State of the termsRio de Janeiro. The São Paulo metropolitan region accounted for 74.1% of our new contract forgross operating revenue in 2012 (excluding revenues relating to the provisionconstruction of concession infrastructure).  We cannot predict how the shared management of these operations will be carried out in the São Paulo metropolitan region and other metropolitan regions we operate in or what effect it may have on our business, financial condition or results of operation.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business –”The Brazilian Basic Sanitation Law is still in the process of implementation and interpretation, and doubts remain as to its full impact on the industry.  ARSESP, the regulator, has the function of implementing regulations under the Basic Sanitation Law within the State of São Paulo, and is in the process of reviewing, implementing and proposing changes to São Paulo State water and sewage services inregulations, including potentially significant changes to the citytariff methodology and structure applicable to our business.  The current regulatory uncertainty, and any of São Paulo, were more complicated.  See “Related Party Transactions―Agreement with the State and the City of São Paulo”.changes that are currently proposed, may have an adverse effect on our business.”

On June 18, 2009, Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009 was enacted and this law revoked Law No. 13,670/2003, which had originally created the discussion on whether the State or the Municipality was the one with the powerspower to grant and monitor formal concessions for water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo.  Although the new law authorized the city of São Paulo to enter into an agreement with us, because the issue of authority between the State or municipal government remain under judicial review, onOn June 23, 2010, we entered into a formal agreement with both the State and the city of São Paulo to regulate the provision of water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo for a 30-year30‑year period, which may be extended for an additional 30-year30‑year period.

Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law for Joint Management


On April 6, 2005, the federal government enacted Federal Law No. 11,107, or the Federal Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law, which regulates Article 241 of the Brazilian Constitution.  This statute provides general principles to be observed when a public consortia enters into contracts with the Brazilian political divisions and subdivisions (the federal government, states, the Federal District and municipalities) aiming at the joint management of public services of common interests.

Federal Decree No. 6,017/2007 details the conditions of establishment of joint management and the execution of the program agreement regulating the Public Consortia and Cooperation Agreement Law.  This federal legislation introduces significant changes in the relationship among municipalities, states and companies providing public sanitation services, prohibiting the latter from exercising activities of planning, oversight and regulation, including tariff regulation, of the services and creating the program agreement for contracting entities whose share control is held by one of the Brazilian political divisions and subdivisions upon waiver of the public bidding process and compliance with concession legislation, as applicable.

On January 13, 2006, the Governor of the State of São Paulo enacted State Decree No. 50,470, amended by State Decrees No. 52,020, dated July 30, 2007, and No. 53,192, dated July 1, 2008, which provide for the renderingof water and sewage services in the State of São Paulo.  According to these decrees, we may enter into agreements with municipalities in connection with the provision of water and sewage services by means of the so-calledso‑called “program agreement without a public bidding process”.process.”  In addition, these decrees establish that we will continue to render services in the areas covered by the concession granted by the State.

64


Based on these statutes, in January 2007 we executed our first program agreement with the municipality of Lins, located in the State of São Paulo.  Subsequently, we formalized agreements with other municipalities in the State of São Paulo.  These other municipalities transferred the oversight and regulation of our services to the State of São Paulo through a cooperation agreement.

On June 8, 2006, the State of São Paulo enacted Decree No. 50,868 creating the Commission for the Regulation of Sanitation Service of the State of São Paulo (Comissão de Regulação do Serviço de Saneamento do Estado de São Paulo – CORSANPA) to regulate sanitation services.  The Commission for the Regulation of Sanitation Service of the State of São Paulo is directly subordinated to the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources.

The main duty of the Commission for the Regulation of Sanitation Service of the State of São Paulo was conducting studies for the creation of a regulatory agency for the basic sanitation industry and the presentation of legal and regulatory measures.  The completion of such duties resulted in the publication of supplementary Law No. 1,025 of December 7, 2007, which created the ARSESP.  Furthermore, Supplementary Law No. 1,025/2007 maintained the State Sanitation Council (Conselho Estadual de Saneamento – CONESAN), created by Supplementary Law No. 7,750/92, as an advisory council to define and implement the state basic sanitation policy, and the State Sanitation Fund (Fundo Estadual de Saneamento - FESAN‑FESAN).  The State Sanitation Fund is connected to the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources, and collects and manages resources that support State-approvedState‑approved programs, as well as the development of technology, management and human resources and a sanitation information system, in addition to other support programs.

The ARSESP regulates the basic sanitation services that belong to the State, relating to the federal and municipal jurisdictions and prerogatives, and is responsible for: 

§

·the compliance with and enforcement of state and federal basic sanitation legislation;

§the publication of the organizational platform for the services, indicating the types of services provided by the State, as well as the equipment and facilities that compose the system;
§the acceptance, where applicable, of the legal attributions of the jurisdictional authority;
§the establishment, in accordance with the tariff guidelines defined by Decree No. 41,446/96, of tariffs and other methods that provide compensation for our services, adjustment and review of such tariffs and methods to  ensure the financial-economic balance of services and low-cost tariffs through mechanisms that increase service efficiency and lead to the distribution of productivity gains to society; and
§the approval, oversight and regulation (including tariff issues) of the sewage treatment and wholesale water supply agreements entered into between the state supplier and other suppliers, pursuant to Article 12 of the Basic Sanitation Law.

·the publication of the organizational platform for the services, indicating the types of services provided by the State, as well as the equipment and facilities that compose the system;

·the acceptance, where applicable, of the legal attributions of the jurisdictional authority;

·the establishment, in accordance with the tariff guidelines defined by Decree No. 41,446/96, of tariffs and other methods that provide compensation for our services, adjustment and review of such tariffs and methods to ensure the financial‑economic balance of services and low‑cost tariffs through mechanisms that increase service efficiency and lead to the distribution of productivity gains to society; and

·the approval, oversight and regulation (including tariff issues) of the sewage treatment and wholesale water supply agreements entered into between the state supplier and other suppliers, pursuant to Article 12 of the Basic Sanitation Law.

With respect to municipal basic sanitation, the ARSESP oversees and regulates services (including tariff issues) that have been delegated by municipalities to the State as a result of cooperation agreements thatauthorize program agreements between the municipalities and us for as long as it is convenient to the municipality’s public interest.


For its services, the ARSESP charges 0.50% of the annual total invoice from sales and servicesgross operating revenue (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure) of the municipality.  This fee is collected from municipalities that have a signed program agreement with us and the municipalities located in the metropolitan regions.

In connection with the scope of our services, Supplementary Law No. 1,025/2007 expanded the range of services that we can render, with the inclusion of urban rainwater drainage and management, urban cleaning andsolid waste management, as well as the operation of power generation, storage, conservation and sales activities, for our own or third-partythird‑party use.

65


In addition, the rules simplified the process for the expansion of our business in Brazil and abroad, authorizing us:

§to participate in the controlling block or the capital of other companies;
§to create subsidiaries, which may become majority or minority shareholders in other companies; and
§

·to participate in the controlling block or the capital of other companies;

·to create subsidiaries, which may become majority or minority shareholders in other companies; and

·to establish partnerships with national or foreign companies, including other state or municipal basic sanitation companies, in order to expand our activities, share technology and expand investments related to basic sanitation services.

Public-PrivatePublic‑Private Partnerships

The PPP is a form of agreement with the public administration used for the concession of services to private enterprises, as well as for construction works coupled with the provision of services.  PPPs are regulated by the State of São Paulo through Law No. 11,688, which was enacted on May 19, 2004.  PPPs may be used for:  (i) implantation, expansion, improvement, reform, maintenance or management of public infrastructure; (ii) provision of public services; and (iii) exploitation of public assets and non-materialnon‑material rights belonging to the State.

Payment is conditionalconditioned upon performance.  The payment may be collected through:  (i) tariffs paid by users; (ii) use of resources from the budget; (iii) assignment of credits belonging to the State; (iv) transfer of rights related to the commercial exploitation of public assets; (v) papertransfer of real property and other property of assets; (vi)  paper from public debts;debts securities; and (vii) other revenues.

In our case, payment is conditional upon performance and is collected through the use of resources from the budget.

Public Financing

In January 2007, the President of Brazil announced a new Growth Acceleration Plan, known as the “PAC”, which includes major investments in infrastructure services, including the provision of water and sewage, housing, as well as highways, airports, ports and energy services, that would benefit the poor population of Brazil.  PAC calls for a total investment of R$504.0 billion through 2010, including a R$40.0 billion investment in the sanitation sector.  The majority of the investment of the PAC would be provided by State-owned companies and the private sector, while the rest would come from the federal government.  Of the amounts dedicated to the sanitation sector, we have obtained various loans from the BNDES and Caixa Econômica Federal totaling R$2.8 billion, the proceeds of which are being used to fund various projects.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness Financing.”

Public Bidding Procedures

Pursuant to the Federal Public Bidding Law, the public bid process commences with publication by the granting authority in a federal, state or municipal official newspaper, as the case may be, and another leading Brazilian newspaper.  The publication announces that the granting authority will carry out a public bidding contest pursuant to provisions set forth in anedital(invitation to bid).  The invitation to bid must specify, among other terms:  (i) the purpose, duration and goals of the bid; (ii) the participation of bidders, either individually or forming a consortium; (iii) a description of the qualifications required for adequate performance of the services covered by the bid; (iv) the deadlines for the submission of the bids; (v) the criteria used for the selection of the winning bidder; and (vi) a list of the documents required to establish the bidder’s technical, financial and legal capabilities.


The invitation to bid is binding on the granting authority.  Bidders may submit their proposals either individually or in consortia, as provided for in the invitation to bid.  After receiving proposals, the granting authority will evaluate each proposal according to the following criteria, which must have been set forth in the invitation to bid:

·the technical quality of the proposal;

·lowest cost or lowest public service tariff offered;

·a combination of the criteria above; or

·the largest amount offered in consideration for the concession.

§

the technical quality of the proposal;

§

lowest cost or lowest public service tariff offered;

§

a combination of the criteria above; or

§

the largest amount offered in consideration for the concession.

The provisions of State Law No. 6,544 of November 2, 1989, as amended, or the State Public Bidding Law, parallel the provisions of the Federal Public Bidding Law.  The Federal and State bidding laws will apply to us in the event that we seek to secure new concessions.  Moreover, these bidding laws currently apply to us with respectto obtaining goods and services from third parties for our business operations or in connection with our capital expenditure program, in each case subject to certain exceptions.

66


Water Usage

State law establishes the basic principles governing the use of water resources in the State of São Paulo in accordance with the State constitution.  These principles include:

§

rational utilization of water resources, ensuring that its primary use is to supply water to the population;

§

optimizing the economic and social benefits resulting from the use of water resources;

§

protection of water resources against actions which could compromise current and future use;

§

defense against critical hydrological events which could cause risk to the health and safety of the population or economic and social losses;

§

development of hydro-transportation for economic benefit;

§

development of permanent programs of conservation and protection of underground water against pollution and excessive exploitation; and

§

prevention of soil erosion in urban and rural areas, with a view to protecting against physical pollution and silting of water resources.

·rational utilization of water resources, ensuring that their primary use is to supply water to the population;

·optimizing the economic and social benefits resulting from the use of water resources;

·protection of water resources against actions which could compromise current and future use;

·defense against critical hydrological events which could cause risk to the health and safety of the population or economic and social losses;

·development of hydro‑transportation for economic benefit;

·development of permanent programs of conservation and protection of underground water against pollution and excessive exploitation; and

·prevention of soil erosion in urban and rural areas, with a view to protecting against physical pollution and silting of water resources.

Under State law, implementation of any project that involves the use of surface or underground water requires prior authorization or licensing from the competent government authority.  In order to implement these principles, authorizations granting a right of use are required from the relevant public authority for water usage (whether for collection, release of effluents or otherwise), modification of the regime and modification of the quality or the quantity of the existing water.  In the case of rivers under the federal government’s domain (rivers crossing more than one state), ANA is the public authority which grants the authorization.  With respect to the rivers under a state’s domain, the applicable state authority has jurisdiction to grant the right of use.  In the State of São Paulo, DAEE is the public authority responsible for granting such authorizations.  DAEE has, as its objectives, establishing (i) a policy for the use of water resources with a view to developing the water business of the State, and (ii) plans, studies and projects related to the use of water resources, directly or by means of agreements with third parties.

Our main operating units have been granted water usage rights; however, we also have several operating units where water grantsrights are not fully in place.  To help obtain the remaining water grants,rights, we have established a corporate program for the legalizationobtaining and maintenance of grants.  We expect to receive water usage rights for all of our operating units by 2013.

In July 2000, ANA was established to develop the National System for Water Resources Management.  According to existing law, the hydrographic basins committees are authorized to charge users, such as us, for the abstraction of water from, or dumping of sewage into, water bodies controlled by these agencies.  Since 2003 and as of December 31, 2011,2012, we have paid R$93.3119.5 million to ANA, DAEE and the State Secretariat for the Environment (Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente), and these agencieswater basins agencies.  These institutions have used these amounts to pay for expenses related to the National and the State Systems for the Management of Water Resources (Sistema Nacional e Sistema Estadual de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos) and principally to sponsor studies, programs, projects and constructions provided for in the Water Basin Plan (Plano de Bacia).  Resources forthese projects may be loaned or provided to governmental agencies and corporations, including us, for use in projects related to the conservation and recovery of water resources.


State Law No. 12,183, which was enacted on December 29, 2005, established the basis for charging for the use of the water resources under the domain of the State of São Paulo.  To apply such charging, the law provides for, among other provisions, the formulation of criteria by the basin committees, the creation of basin agencies and the organization of a registered list of water resource users.  The basin committee’s proposals regarding the criteria to calculate the amounts to be charged at each basin must be approved by the State Water Resource Council, and formalized by a decree issued by the State Governor.

67


Water Quality

Administrative Rule No. 2,914/2011, issued by the Ministry of Health of the federal government, provides the standards for potable water for human consumption in Brazil.  This rule is similar to the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act and the regulations enacted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which establishes rules for sampling and limits related to substances that are potentially hazardous to human health.

In compliance with Brazilian law, the physical-chemical,physical‑chemical, organic and bacteriological analyses carried out for water quality control follow the methodologies of the Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater (21st(21st edition) of the American Water Works Association.

Decree No. 5,440/2005 provides that the quality of water must be disclosed to consumers.  We have been complying with this regulation by publishing the required information in monthly bills and annual reports delivered to all consumers that we serve.

Environmental Regulation

The implementation and operation of water and sewage systems are subject to strict federal, state and municipal laws and regulations on environmental and water-resourcewater‑resource protection.  The National Environmental Council (Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiental), or the CONAMA, is the federal agency responsible for the regulation of potentially polluting activities.  In the State of São Paulo, the Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo, or CETESB, is the governmental entity responsible for the control, supervision, monitoring and licensing of polluting activities, pursuant to State Law No. 997 of 1976 and State Law No. 13,542 of 2009.  The CETESB regulates the control of environmental pollutants.

The control and environmental planning instruments are defined by several legal instruments, such as State Law No. 997/1976, which regulates the environmental pollution control; the CONAMA Resolution No. 05/1988, which requires licensing of sanitation projects that cause significant alterations to the environment; the CONAMA Resolution No. 237/1997, which regulates (i) environmental licenses, (ii) the federal, state and local jurisdiction over environmental issues, (iii) the list of activities subject to licensing; and (iv) environmental impact studies and reports; State Decree No. 47,400/2002 and related articles from State Law No. 9,509/1997 regarding environmental licensing; and State Decree No. 8,468/76, the CONAMA Resolution No. 357/2005, the CONAMA Resolution No. 397/08 and the CONAMA Resolution No. 430/11 and the granting of rights for using and interfering with water resources (Portaria Departamento de Águas e Energia Elétrica 717/96).  Projects with significant environmental impact are subject to specific studies prepared by multidisciplinary teams that present a series of recommendations focused on minimizing the environmental impact.  These studies are then submitted for analysis and approval by the government authorities.  The licensing process is composed of three stages, including the following licenses:

·        preliminary license – granted in the planning stage, approving the location and concept and attesting to the project’s environmental feasibility;

§preliminary license – granted in the planning stage, approving the location and concept and attesting to the project’s environmental feasibility;
§installation license – authorizing the beginning of works for the installation of the project, subject to compliance with approved plans, programs and projects, including environmental control measures and other necessary technical requirements; and
§

·installation license – authorizing the beginning of works for the installation of the project, subject to compliance with approved plans, programs and projects, including environmental control measures and other necessary technical requirements; and

·operation license – authorizing the operation of a unit or activity, subject to compliance with the technical requirements contained in the installation license.

We have established a program (Programa Corporativo de Manutenção e RegularizaçãObtencão dedo Licenciamento Ambiental) to obtain all necessary licenses in an effort to bring us into full compliance with environmental regulations within five years.by 2015.  As of the date of this annual report, we were not in possession of all licenses required in connection with our operations. Our failure to obtain such licenses may result in the imposition of fines and penalties.  With respect to new operations, feasibility and environmental compliance are carried out throughout the project.respective projects.

68



 

Sewage Requirements

State law sets forth regulations regarding pollution control and environmental preservation in the State of São Paulo.  State law establishes the conditions and limitations for waste discharge that impactsimpact water, air and soil.soil resources.  According to this law, in areas in which there is a public sewage system, all effluents of a “polluting source” must be discharged to such system.  It is the responsibility of the polluting source to connect itself to the public sewage system.  All effluents to be discharged are required to meet the standards and conditions established by the applicable environmental law, which allows such effluents to be treated by our treatment facilities and discharged in an environmentally safe manner.  Effluents that do not comply with such criteria are prohibited from being discharged into the public sewage system.  State legislation also establishes that liquid effluents, except those related to basic sanitation, be subjected to pre-treatmentpre‑treatment so that they meet the required mandatory levels before being discharged into the public sewage system.  National sanitation guidelines are also established in Article 45 of Federal Law No. 11,455/2007.

The CETESB is authorized under State law to monitor discharges of pollutants into the environment and to enforce the requirements of State law.  The CETESB is responsible for issuing preliminary installation and operation licenses granted to the pollution sources, including sewage treatment facilities.

The CETESB also regulates the discharge of effluents into water bodies and must approve all of our treatment facilities in accordance with federal and state regulations.  State and federal water resource legislation establishestablishes the charging of fees for the discharge of treated effluents into water bodies.  This provision is already in force in relation to some water basins, and is in different stages of implementation in remaining basins.  See “—Government Regulation—Water Usage.”

Governmental Restrictions on Incurrence of Debt

On June 30, 1998, the CMN issued Resolution No. 2,515/98 amending certain conditions that must be observed with respect to the external credit operations (i.e., foreign currency borrowings) of states, the Federal District of Brasilia, municipalities and their respectiveautarquias(agencies), foundations and non-financialnon‑financial companies, including us.  This resolution provides, among other things, that, with certain exceptions applicable to the importation of goods and services:

§the proceeds of external credit operations must be exclusively used to refinance outstanding financial obligations of the borrower, with preference given to those obligations that have a higher cost and a shorter term, and, until used for such purposes, the proceeds shall remain deposited, as directed by the Central Bank, in a pledged account; and
§

·the proceeds of external credit operations must be exclusively used to refinance outstanding financial obligations of the borrower, with preference given to those obligations that have a higher cost and a shorter term, and, until used for such purposes, the proceeds shall remain deposited, as directed by the Central Bank, in a pledged account; and

·the total amount of the contractual obligation must be subject to monthly deposits in a pledged account, equal to the total debt service obligation, including principal and interest, divided by the number of months that the obligation is to be outstanding.

The CMN resolution further provides that the requirements described above do not apply to financing transactions involving multilateral or official organizations such as the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, or IBRD, the IADB or the JICA.  The Central Bank regulation implementing this resolution provides, among other things, that the account referred to in the first bullet point above must be an account opened in a federal financial institution, which is to hold such funds until released for the purpose of refinancing outstanding obligations of the borrower.  The Central Bank regulation further provides that the account described in the second bullet point above must be an escrow account to be opened in a federal financial institution and to secure the payment of principal and interest on the external debt.

Our foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated transactions are also subject to the approval of the National Secretariat of Treasury (Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional) and the Central Bank.  After reviewing the financial terms and conditions of the transaction, the National Secretariat of Treasury and the Central Bank will issue an approval for the closing of the foreign exchange transaction relating to the entry of the funds into Brazil and, following such entry and at our request, an electronic certificate of registration through which all scheduled payments of principal, interest and expenses will be remitted by us.  The electronic certificate of registration grants the borrower access to the market for foreign exchange.

69


Lending Limits of Brazilian Financial Institutions

The CMN Resolution No. 2,827 dated as of March 30, 2001, as amended, limits the amount that Brazilian financial institutions may lend to public sector companies, such as us.  Financing of projects which are put up for international bid and any financing inreaisprovided to the Brazilian counterpart of such international bids are excluded from these limits.


Scope of Business

State Law No. 12,292, dated as of March 2, 2006, and amended State Law No. 119, dated as of June 29, 1973, which created our Company, authorizes us to provide water and sewage services outside São Paulo (in other states of Brazil and other countries).  This law also authorizes us to own interests in other public or private-publicprivate‑public companies and Brazilian or international consortiums.consortia.  In addition, this law permittedpermits us to incorporate subsidiaries and enter into a partnership with or acquire interests in a private company with a corporate purpose related to the sanitation business.

C.Organizational structure

Not applicable.

D.Property, Plant, Equipment and EquipmentIntangible Assets

Our principal property, plant and equipment comprise administrative facilities which are stated at historical costs less depreciation.  The reservoirs, water treatment facilities, water distribution networks consisting of water pipes, water mains, water connections and water meters, sewage treatment facilities, and sewage collection networks consisting of sewer lines and sewage connections are recorded as intangible assets (concession assets).  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we operated through 66,38967,647 kilometers of water pipes and mains and 45,07345,778 kilometers of sewer lines.  As of that same date, we operated 212214 water treatment facilities and 490502 sewage treatment facilities (including nine ocean outfalls), as well as 16 water quality control laboratories.

We own our headquarters building and all other major administrative buildings.  We have pledged some of our properties as collateral to the federal government in connection with a long-termlong‑term financing transaction we have entered into with the IBRD that was guaranteed by the federal government.  We have also pledged part of our assets in the amount of R$249.0 million as collateral as of December 31, 2011,2012, with respect to our indebtedness under the Special Program for Payment of Federal and Social Security Related Taxes in Installments (Programa de Parcelamento Especial para Impostos Federais e Previdenciários), or PAES program.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the total net book value of our property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (including concession assets) was R$20,498.122,375.3 million.

All of our material properties are located in the State of São Paulo.

ITEM 4A.             UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.  The consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report have been prepared in complianceaccordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.  This annual report contains forward-lookingforward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, those set forth in “Risk Factors.”

In the following discussion, references to increases or decreases in any period are made by comparison with the corresponding prior period, except as the context otherwise indicates.

70


A.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Overview

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we operated water and sewage systems in the State of São Paulo, including in the city of São Paulo, Brazil’s largest city, and in 363 municipalities in the State of São Paulo, which represented 56.3% of all municipalities in the State.  We also provided water services on a wholesale basis to six municipalities located in the São Paulo metropolitan region and to the municipality of Sumaré in which we did not operate water distribution systems.

The São Paulo metropolitan region, which includes the city of São Paulo, is our most important service region.  With a total population of approximately 20.420.8 million, the São Paulo metropolitan region accounted for 75.6%74.1%, 74.5%73.9% and 73.9%74.5% of our gross operating revenue from salesin 2012, 2011 and services in 2009, 2010 and 2011 (excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure), respectively.  60.6%As of December 31, 2012, 57.8% of theconcession intangible assets reflected on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 waswere located in this region.  In an effort to respond to demand in the São Paulo metropolitan region and because the region represents the principal opportunity to increase our net operating revenue, from sales and services, we have concentrated a major portion of our capital expenditure program to expand the water and sewage systems and to increase and protect water sources in this region.  Our capital expenditure program is our most significant liquidity and capital resource requirement.


Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our results of operations and financial condition are generally affected by our ability to raise tariffs, general economic conditions in Brazil and, in some previous periods, meteorological conditions.

In 2008, our net income was strongly affected by the global financial and economic crisis, which began in 2008 and whose effects were still present in 2009, resultedresulting in a depreciation of the Brazilianrealagainst the U.S. dollar, which adversely affected our obligations denominated in foreign currency.

In order to ensure itsour economic and financial strength, we have been working on increasing our efficiency and productivity gains.  For this reason, we have attempted to reduce costs.  In 2009, we decreased our staff by 9.3% pursuant to an Agreement for the Adjustment of Conduct (Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta), or TAC, with the State Public Attorney’s Office (Ministério Público Estadual).  Pursuant to the TAC, we laid off retirees who were still working for us, and laid offas well as employees representing approximately 2% of our workforce.  Our results of operations for the 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 fiscal years were also affected by a provision for severance payments in the amount of R$146.649.9 million for employees who resigned in 2009,2012, R$47.0 million for employees who resigned in 2011 and R$19.0 million for employees who resigned in 2010 and R$47.0 million for employees who resigned in 2011.2010.

In 2011,2012, our costs and expenses increased 15.7%4.2% compared to a decreasean increase of 25%56.3% in our net income.  In 2011,2012, the volume invoiced increased 3.1%2.7% compared to 2010.2011.  The other increases are mainly related to depreciation and amortization, wages, the agreement with São Paulo, construction costs and credits write-off,credit write‑offs, which amount to R$216.222.1 million, R$405.5 million, R$166.4237.5 million and R$112.171.9 million, respectively.

Effects of Tariff Increases

Our results of operations and financial condition are highly dependent upon our ability to increase tariffs for our water and sewage services.  Since the enactment of the Basic Sanitation Law in 2007, as a general rule, regulatory agencies will be responsible for setting, adjusting and reviewing tariffs, taking into consideration, among other factors, the following:

§·        political considerations arising from our status as a State-controlledState‑controlled company;

§·        anti‑inflation measures enacted by the federal government from time to time; and

§·        when necessary, the readjustment to maintain the original balance between each party’s obligation and economic gain (equilíbrio econômico-financeiromico‑financeiro) under the agreement.

71


Readjustment of our tariffs continues to be set annually and depend on the parameters established by the Basic Sanitation Law and the ARSESP.  The guidelines also establish procedural steps and the terms for annual adjustments.  The annual adjustments must be announced 30 days prior to the effective date of the new tariffs, which take effect in September and remain in place for a period of at least 12 months. See “4.B. Business Overview—Tariffs.”

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage increase of our tariffs, as compared to three inflation indexes:

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

 

 

Increase in average tariff(1)

4.4%

4.1%

6.8%

Increase in average tariff(1)

5.2%

6.8%

4.1%

Inflation – IPC – FIPE

3.7%

6.4%

5.8%

5.1%

5.8%

6.4%

Inflation – IPCA

4.3%

5.9%

6.5%

5.8%

6.5%

5.9%

Inflation – IGP-M

(1.7)%

11.3%

5.1%

Inflation – IGP‑M

7.8%

5.1%

11.3%

________________________________

(1)   Since 2007, tariff readjustments have taken effect in September, one month after the readjustment announcement.

Sources:  Central Bank,Fundação Getulio Vargas, or FGV, andFundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas

On April 22, 2013, ARSESP approved a revision to tariff index to a rate of 2.3509% to be applied linearly on tariffs. See “4.B. Business Overview – Tariffs.”


Effects of Brazilian Economic Conditions

As a company with all of its operations in Brazil, our results of operations and financial condition are affected by general economic conditions in Brazil, particularly by exchange rate fluctuations,the economic activity and the inflation rates and interest rate levels.rate.  For example, the general performance of the Brazilian economy affectsmay affect our cost of capital and inflation affectsmay affect our costs and margins.  The Brazilian economic environment has been characterized by significant variations in economic growth rates.  However, as our product is viewed as essential, our sales revenue has demonstrated high stability over the past three years.

General Economic Conditions

The year 20082010 was characterized by the worseninga strong recovery of the global financial and economic crisis.  As a result, thereal depreciated by 32.0% against the U.S. dollar in 2008.  Nonetheless, at December 31, 2008, Brazil had R$206.8 billion in currency reserves and a trade surplus of R$24.8 billion.  The average unemployment rate in Brazil’s principal metropolitan regions was 6.8% in 2009.  The crisis’ main effect on the Brazilian economy, waswith a decline in expectations for economic activity in 2009 and, toGDP growth of 7.5%, after two years of a lesser extent, in 2010.  The year of 2011 was marked by the economic crises in the Euro zone.  In Brazil, there was a depreciation of 12.6% of the Brazilian real against the US dollar and Brazilian GDP increased by 2.7%.global crisis.

In 2009, Brazilian GDP decreased 0.2% in comparison with 2008.  Nonetheless, at that same year Brazil had US$239.1 billion in currency reserves and its trade surplus was US$25.3 billion.  The average unemployment rate in Brazil’s principal metropolitan regions remained stable at 6.8% in 2009.

In 2010, Brazilian GDP increased 7.5% in comparison with 2009.  At that same year, Brazil had US$288.6 billion in currency reserves and its trade surplus was US$20.3 billion.  The average unemployment rate in Brazil’s principal metropolitan regions was 6.7% in 2010.

In 2011, Brazilian GDP increased 2.7% in comparison with 2010.  At that same year, Brazil had US$352 billion in currency reserves and its trade surplus was US$29.8 billion.  The average unemployment rate in Brazil’s principal metropolitan regions was 6% in 2011.

In 2012, Brazilian GDP increased 0.9% in comparison with 2011.  At that same year, Brazil had US$378 billion in currency reserves and its trade surplus was US$19.4 billion, the worst it has been in the last decade.  The average unemployment rate in Brazil’s principal metropolitan regions was 5.5% in 2012, the lowest it has been since March 2002.

Interest Rates

High domestic interest rates result in increases in our financial expenses and also negatively affect our ability to obtain financing, on a cost-effective basis, in the domestic capital and lending markets.  As a result, we may continue to require substantial amounts of foreign currency-denominated indebtedness in order to satisfy our liquidity and funding requirements, which may increase our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, as discussed below.

The official interest rate set by the Central Bank, the SELIC overnight rate, was 13.66% as of December 31, 2008.  In 2009, in order to boost the economy, the Central Bank reduced the official interest rate significantly, reaching 8.65% as of December 31, 2009.  In 2010, the Central Bank increased interest rates, and the official interest rate, as defined by the SELIC overnight rate target, was 10.66% as of December 31, 2010.  AsIn 2011, until the month of December 31, 2011,August, the Central Bank continued increasing the SELIC overnight rate, reaching 12.50% in July.  In the month of August, the Central Bank started decreasing the SELIC, closing 2011 at 11.00%.  This downward trend was 10.91%maintained in 2012, with the SELIC rate closing the year of 2012 at 7.25%The reduction of the domestic interest rates to reduce the cost of debt, with interest rates linked to SELIC rate.

72


With respect to our foreign currency-denominated debt, observed a reduction in the cost of the debt linked to floating interest rates, since international interest rates have substantially reduced following the global crisis of 2008.  With regards to our fixed rate foreign currency denominated capital market debt, we have observed that it has been negotiated at the secondary bond markets with a reduction in the final yield, which may favor us, in the future, aiming to reduce interest costs and improve debt profile. 

We have not utilized any derivative financial instruments or any hedging instruments to mitigate interest rate fluctuations.  We do, however, continually monitorHowever, we prioritise long term debt in foreign currency alongside multilateral organizations and official foreign government agencies and take advantage of market interest rates in orderopportunities to evaluate the possible needpreform “liability management” to refinance our debt.reduce cost and anticipate refinancing situations.

Inflation

Inflation affects our financial performance by increasing our costs of services rendered and operating expenses.  In addition, allPart of ourreal-denominated‑denominated debt is directly indexed to take into account the effects of inflation. MostAdditionally, we are exposed to the mismatch between the inflation adjustement indices of ourreal-denominated debt provides for inflation-based loans and financing and those of our receivables. Water supply and sewage service tariffs do not necessarily follow the increases in the respective principal amounts of that indebtedness, which are determined by reference to the daily government referenceinflation adjustment and interest rate (Taxa Referencial), or TR, plus an agreed margin.rates affecting our debt.  We cannot assure you that our tariffs will be increased, in future periods, to offset, in full or in part, the effects of inflation. 

Inflation adjustments derive from collections from or payment to third parties, as contractually required by law or court decision, and are recognized on an accrual basis. Inflation adjustments included in these agreements and decisions are not considered embedded derivatives, since they are deemed as inflation adjustments for us. See Notes 2.22, 3.1 and 24 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the impacts of inflation adjustments on our financial performance and debt.

Currency Exchange Rates

We had total foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated indebtedness of R$3,053.43,215.8 million as of December 31, 2011,2012, of which R$189.4197.7 million relates to our short-termcurrent portion of our long-term foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated obligations.  In the event of significant devaluations of therealin relation to the U.S. dollar or other currencies, the cost of servicing our foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated obligations would increase as measured inreais, particularly as our tariff and other revenue areis based solely inreais.  In addition, any significant devaluation of therealwill increase our financial expenses as a result of foreign exchange losses that we must record.  For example, in 2008, the 32.0% devaluation of therealin 2008against the dollar and the 62.9% devaluation of therealagainst the yen increased our financial expenses and negatively affected our overall results of operations for thethat year.  In contrast, in 2009 and 2010, the 25.5% appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar in2009 led to a foreign exchange gain of R$528.4 million.  In 2010, theand 4.3% appreciationappreciations of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the 27.1% appreciation and 9.0% depreciation of therealagainst the yen, respectively, led to a foreign exchange gaingains of R$528.4 million and R$66.1 million.million, respectively.  In 2011, the 12.6% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the 18.6% depreciation of therealagainst the yen, respectively, led to a foreign exchange loss of R$382.3 million.  In 2012, the 8.94% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar offset by the 2.4% appreciation of therealagainst the yen, respectively, led to a foreign exchange loss of R$50.5 million.  However, since most of our debt denominated in foreign currencies is long-term debt with a long amortization schedule, a devaluation of the real would principally impact cash flows regarding the current portion of our long-term debt.


We manage our indebtedness portfolio closely to decrease the cost of servicing our indebtedness as a whole and our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.  We do not speculate in foreign currencies, and we do not have any exposure to derivatives tied to foreign currencies.

The following table shows the fluctuation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar, the period-endperiod‑end exchange rates and the average exchange rates as of or for the periods indicated:

Year ended December 31

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

Depreciation (appreciation) of therealversus U.S. dollar

(25.5)%

(4.3)%

12.6%

8.9%

12.6%

(4.3)%

Period-end exchange rate – US$1.00

R$1.741

R$1.666

R$1.876

Average exchange rate – US$1.00(1)

R$1.994

R$1.759

R$1.675

Period‑end exchange rate – US$1.00

R$2.0435

R$1.8758

R$1.6662

Average exchange rate – US$1.00(1)

R$1.9550

R$1.6746

R$1.7593

____________________________________

(1)   Represents the average for period indicated.

Source:  Central Bank.

73


 

The following table shows the fluctuation of therealagainst the yen, the period‑end exchange rates and the average exchange rates as of or for the periods indicated:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Depreciation (appreciation) of therealversus yen

(2.4)% 

18.6% 

9.0% 

Period‑end exchange rate –¥1.00

0.0237

0.0243

0.0205

Average exchange rate – ¥1.00(1)

0.0245

0.0211

0.0201

______________

(1)   Represents the average for period indicated.

Source:  Central Bank.

From time to time, we may enter into forward exchange transactionstotransactions to mitigate foreign currency exposure.  In addition, we have monitored, overseen and controlled our foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated indebtedness, taking advantage of market opportunities to improve the profile of our indebtedness and reduce our costs.  As ofDuring the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 we had no outstanding forward exchange transactions.

Effects of Climate Change (Drought and Intense RainfallsRainfalls)

We operate in a region of Brazil that has been prone to droughts, although historically droughts have not impacted all of our water supply systems equally.  Brazil experienced a prolonged and severe drought during 2000 and 2001.  As a result, from mid-Junemid‑June to mid-Septembermid‑September of 2000, we rationed water in the south of the São Paulo metropolitan region, affecting approximately 3.5 million people, or approximately 20% of the total population of this region, which reduced our total water production by approximately 8%.  From April 2001 through January 2002 and from October to December 2003,In March 2004 when our reservoirs were at extremely low levels, we also rationed water in certain regions of the São Paulo metropolitan region, but onimplemented a much smaller scale.  This rationing on a smaller scale caused our total water production volume to be reduced by only 0.8%.  The effects of the drought continued to affect our systems through 2004.  Due to the water usage reduction bonus program that we operated from March to September 2004, when rainfall was extremely low and our reservoirs were at correspondingly low levels, and the returnprogram.  After returning to normal rainfall levels, thatwhich occurred throughoutbetween 2004 and early 2005, the conditionscondition of our reservoirs improved in 2005.  In 2006, rainfall was sufficient to enable us to maintain our reservoirs at levels reflecting the historic average.improved.  In 2007 and 2008, rainfall exceeded the levels of previous years, increasing the volume of water held in our reservoirs and thereby providing a cushion to meet demand.  In 2009, rainfall levels were higher than the historic average and byaverage.  In 2012, rainfall levels reached almost historic averages, but the endrainfall was irregular among our systems, with more rainfall in smaller systems.As of 2009,December 31, 2012, our reservoirs had a utilization rate of 87.0%50.6%, compared to a 50.0% and 41.0%62.8% utilization as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  In 2011, rainfall levels were slightly lower than historical averages and occurred during unusual times of year.  As of December 31, 2011, our reservoirs had a utilization rate of 62.8%, compared to a 74.4% utilization as of December 31, 2010.2011.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

We make estimates and assumptions concerning the future.  The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amount of our assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressedmentioned below.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for doubtful accounts in an amount that our management considers sufficient to cover probable losses, based on an analysis of customer accounts receivable, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 2.82.6 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20102012, 2011 and 2011.2010.  Provisions for the allowance for doubtful accounts are included in selling expenses, net of recoveries.  The net charge to this allowance was R$117.4192.3 million, R$120.4 million and R$232.5 million in 2012, 2011 and R$120.4 million in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.

The methodology for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts requires significant estimates, considering a number of factors, including historical collection experience, current economic trends,estimates of forecast write-offs,write‑offs, the aging of the accounts receivable portfolio and other factors.  While we believe that the estimates used are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with Brazilian GAAP, managementManagement estimates the fair value of financial instruments using information available in the market and appropriate estimating methodologies.  Management uses considerable personal judgment to interpret the information available in the market when developing estimates of fair value.  Therefore, the estimates presented may not necessarily indicate the value that would be obtained for the financial instruments if they were realized on the market.  The use of different market assumptions and/or estimating methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair values.

Indemnities Receivable

Indemnities receivable is a long-termlong‑term asset representing amounts receivable from the municipalities of Diadema and Mauá as indemnification for their unilateral termination of our water and sewage service concessions in 1995.  As of each of December 31, 2009 and 2010, this asset amounted to R$146.2 million.  In 2011, the Companywe decided to record a provision for losses related to the amount receivable from Mauá and in 2012 we recognized a provision for lossesrelated to Diadema, amounting to R$85.9 million and R$60.3 million, respectively, due to the uncertainty and recognized only the amount receivable from Diadema, since there is an ongoing negotiation. The amount receivable from Diadema amounted as of December 31, 2011, to R$60.3 million.in collection.

74


Prior to their termination, pursuant to our concession contracts, we invested in the construction of water and sewage systems in these municipalities to meet our concession service commitments.  Upon the unilateral termination of the concessions by the municipalities of Diadema and Mauá, our assets were impounded by the municipal authorities, which took on the responsibility of providing water and sewage services in these areas.  At that time, we reclassified our property, plant and equipment balances relating to the impounded assets as long-termlong‑term assets (indemnities receivable) and recorded impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of the assets to the estimated recoverable amounts which we had contractually agreed as fair compensation with these municipal authorities.

Our rights to recover these amounts are being disputed by the municipalities, and no amounts have been received to date.  Based on the advice of legal counsel, weWe continue to believe that we have the right to receive those amounts, and we continue to monitor the status of the legal proceedings.  The ultimate amounts to be received however, if any, will most likely be subject to a final court decision.  Therefore, actual amounts received could differ from those recorded.  For more information, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009.2010.

Valuation of Long-LivedLong‑Lived Assets

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of R$356.5383.4 million and R$20,141.721,991.9 million, respectively.

We review long-livedProperty, plant and equipment, intangibles and other noncurrent assets primarily buildings, water and sewage system assets and concession intangible assets to be held and used in our business,with definite useful lives, are reviewed annually for the purpose of determining and measuring impairment on a recurring basisimpairments or whenwhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assetsamount may not be recoverable.  AccordingThe Company does not have assets with indefinite useful lives and concluded that there are no indications of impairment losses.

We recognize intangible assets arising from concession contracts under IFRIC 12.  We estimate the fair value of construction and other work on the infrastructure to IFRS, we evaluate possible impairment by determining whether projected future operating income is sufficient to absorbrecognize the depreciation or amortization of long-lived assets, within the contextcost of the intangible asset, which is recognized when the infrastructure is built and provided that it will generate future economic benefits.  The great majority of the Company’s contracts for service concession arrangements entered with each grantor is under service concession agreements in which the Company has the right to receive, at the end of the contract, a payment equivalent to the unamortized asset balance sheetof the concession intangible asset, which in this case, is amortized over the useful life of the underlying physical assets; thus at the end of the contract, the remaining value of the intangible would be equal to the residual value of the related physical asset.

The fair value of construction and other work on the infrastructure is recognized as revenue, at its fair value, when the infrastructure is built, provided that this work is expected to generate future economic benefits.  The accounting policy for the recognition of construction revenue is described in Note 2.5 “Gross Operating Revenue.”

Intangible assets related to concession agreements and program contracts, when there is no right to receive the residual value of the assets at the end of the contract, are amortized on a whole.

Studies supportingstraight-line basis over the write-offs for obsolescence and abandonment of projects are conducted in the accounting period of the write-offs based on discounted cash flow projections,contract or the useful life of the underlying asset, whichever is shorter.

Investments made and approved by our boardnot recovered through rendering of directors.  We monitorservices, within the carrying valueterms of our property, plant and equipment on an on-going basis and adjustagreement, must be indemnified by the net book value to assure future projected operations will be sufficient to recoverconcession grantor; (1) with cash or cash equivalents or also, in general, (2) with a contract extension.  These investments are amortized over the carrying valueuseful life of the assets.asset.

In evaluating impairmentLaw 11445/07 prescribes that, whenever possible, basic sanitation public utilities shall have their economic and financial sustainability ensured through the consideration received from service collection, preferably as tariffs and other public charges, which may be established for each service or both.  Therefore, investments made and not recovered through these services, within the original term of our long-livedthe contract, are recorded as intangible assets we make significantand amortized over the useful life of the asset, taking into consideration a solid track record of concession renewal and, therefore, the continuity of services.

75


The recognition of fair value for the intangible assets arising on concession contracts is subject to assumptions and estimates, regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, including projections of future operating income and cash flows, future growth rates and the remaining useful lives of the assets, among other factors.  In addition, projections are computed over an extended period of time, which subjects those assumptions and estimates to an even larger degree of uncertainty.  While we believe that the estimates we use are reasonable, the use of different assumptions could materially affect our valuations.

Amortizationthe balances recorded.  The amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization is calculated when the intangible assets are available for use in the necessary condition established by the Company.


Amortization reflects the period over the expected future economic benefits generated by the intangible asset and can be the period of the contract, depending on the contract.  The utilization of the assets is related to the useful life of the assets constructed by the Company and amortization of the intangible assets is considered in the calculation of the tariff.

Amortization of the intangible assets finishes when the asset is totally consumed or is alienated, not being considered in the calculation of the tariff any longer, whichever occurs first.

Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation of our property, plant and equipment, primarily buildings, water and sewage service and other assets acquired, is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets.  While we believe that ourassets also requires significant assumptions and estimates, of current remaining estimated lives is reasonable, the use ofwhich different assumptions and estimates, and changes in future circumstances, could affect theamortization of intangible assets and remaining useful lives of our asset, which couldthe underlying assets and can have a significant impact on ourthe results of operations in the future.operations.

Provision for Contingencies

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we were party to judicial and administrative proceedings, relating to civil, environmental and tax matters, amounting to R$1,571.81,189.2 million (excluding the amount of R$120.7317.0million related to court deposits) with respect to which we considered the risk of loss as probable.  As of that date, proceedings with respect to which we considered the risk of loss as possible amounted to R$2,621.82,796.7 million, and those with respect to which we considered the risk of loss as remote amounted to R$19,958.332,881.0 million.

We are a party to a number of legal proceedings involving significant monetary claims.  These legal proceedings include, among other types, disputes with customers and suppliers and tax, labor, civil, environmental and other proceedings.  For a more detailed discussion of these legal proceedings, see Note 1516 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20102012, 2011 and 2011.2010.  We accrue for probable losses resulting from these claims and proceedings when we determine that the likelihood that a loss has occurred is probable and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated.  Therefore, we are required to make judgments regarding future events for which we often seek the advice of legal counsel.  As a result of the significant judgment required in assessing and estimating these provisions for contingencies,risks, actual losses realized in future periods could differ significantly from our estimates and could exceed the amounts which we have provisioned.

Pension PlansBenefits

The present value of the pension obligations dependdepends on a number of factors that are determined on an actuarial basis using a number of assumptions.  The assumptions used in determining the net cost (income) for pensions include thea discount rate.rate and a mortality table.  Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount of pension obligations.

We determine the appropriate discount rates at the end of each year, which is the interest rate that should be used to determine the present value of estimated future cash outflows expected to be required to settle the pension obligations.The discount rate was reduced from 5.75% in 2011 to 4.0% in 2012 under Plan G0 and from 5.75% in 2011 to 4.1% in 2012 under Plan G1 in order to follow the decrease in the rates applicable to the Brazilian Government NTN – B, long term notes, which term is similar to the duration of the pension benefits.  Since the Company applied the “corridor” approach, actuarial losses exceeding the “corridor” limit are accounted for in the following years, as described in Notes 2.21 (a) and 17 (b) to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Other key assumptions for pension obligations are based in part on current market conditions.  Additional information on the pension plans under Plan G0 and G1 is disclosed in Note 16.17.

The Company adopts the “corridor” method to recognize actuarial gains and losses.  Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions in excess of the greater of 10% of the fair value of plan assets or 10% of the present value of the defined benefit obligation are charged or credited to income over the employees’ expected average remaining working lives.  The higher the number of plan retirees the smaller is the average remaining working period of plan participants.  For plans substantially composed of retirees and pensioners, the Company immediately records all actuarial gains and losses in excess of the limits of the corridor, i.e. on the first day of the subsequent year after the calculation of the referred actuarial gains or losses.  The expenses related to the pension plan are recognized in profit and loss for the year as cost of sales and services, selling expenses or administrative expenses, according to the employee’s allocation.

Differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions could affect the carrying amount of pension obligations and expenses recognized in our results.

76


The amendments to IAS 19 alter the accounting for both defined benefit plans and severance pay benefits.  The most significant change refers to the accounting for changes in defined benefit obligations and plan assets.  These amendments require the recognition of changes in defined benefit obligations and in the fair value of the plan assets as they occur, and, therefore, the elimination of the “corridor” approach allowed in the previous version of IAS 19 and the early recognition of past cost of services.  In addition, the amendments require all actuarial gains and losses to be immediately recognized through other comprehensive income so that the net asset or liability of the pension plan is recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position to reflect the full amount of the plan’s deficit or surplus.  Additionally, interest expenses and the return expected on the plan assets used in previous version of IAS 19 were replaced by a “net interest” amount, calculated based on the discount rate of the asset or liability of the net defined benefit.  The amendments to IAS 19 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and require retrospective adoption.  Based on Management’s preliminary evaluation, the impact of the Company’s early adoption of the amendments to IAS 19 in the year ending December 31, 2013, would be a reduction in the Company’s equity on January 1, 2013 in the amount of R$468,220 (R$34,370 increase in equity on January 1, 2012).  This effect represents the full recognition of actuarial gains and losses through other comprehensive income.

Deferred income tax and social contribution

The Company recognizes and settles taxes on income based on the results of operations verified according to the Brazilian Corporate Law, taking into consideration the provisions of the tax laws.  Pursuant to IAS 12, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the accounting balances and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. 

The Company regularly reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets and recognizes a provision for impairment if it is probable that these assets will not be realized, based on historic taxable income, the projection of future taxable income and the estimated period to reverse temporary differences.  These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions.  The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in provision for impairment of all or a significant amount of deferred tax assets.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we have recognized R$141.4 million and R$179.5 million, respectively, as deferred income tax assets, net of the deferred tax liabilities, as disclosed in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Certain Transactions with Controlling Shareholder

Reimbursement Due from the State

Reimbursement due from the State for pensions paid represent supplementary pensions (Plan G0) that we pay, on behalf of the State, to former employees of State-ownedState‑owned companies which merged to form our Company.  These amounts must be reimbursed to us by the State, as primary obligor.

In November 2008, we entered into the third amendment to the agreement with the State relating to payments of pension benefits made by us on its behalf.  The State acknowledged that it owed us an outstanding balance of R$915.3 million as of September 30, 2008, relating to payments of pension benefits made by us on its behalf.  We provisionally accepted, but it is not recognized in our books, the reservoirs in the Alto Tietê System as partial payment in the amount of R$696.3 million, subject to the transfer of theproperty rights of these reservoirs to us.  Since November 2008, the State has been paying the remaining balance in the amount of R$219.0 million in 114 successive monthly installments.  See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 and “Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”


As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amounts not recorded related to the pension benefits paid on behalf of the State by the Company, totaled R$1,351,210 and R$1,290,663, respectively, including the amount of R$696,283 related to the transfer of the reservoirs in the Alto Tietê system. As a result, the Company also recognized the obligation related to the pension benefit maintained with the beneficiaries and pensioners of Plan G0.As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the pension benefit obligations of Plan G0 totaled R$1,547,161 and R$1,512,078, respectively. For detailed information on the pension benefit obligations refer to Note 17 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounts Receivable from the State for Water and Sewage Services Rendered

Certain of these accounts receivable have been overdue for a long period, and we do not reserve against such accounts receivable as we fully expect to recover these amounts and loss is not considered probable.period. We have entered into agreements with the State with respect to these accounts receivable.  For further information on these agreements, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements as ofofDecember 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

77


Use of Certain Assets Owned by the State

We currentlyIn our operations, we use certain reservoirs in the BillingsGuarapiranga and GuarapirangaBillings reservoirs, which are owned indirectlyalso used by another entity controlled by the State.  We currently do not pay any feesSão Paulo State Government (Empresa Metropolitana de Águas e Energia S.A. – EMAE), according to grants from the relevant competent body and in compliance with respectthe prevailing legislation.

EMAE has requested the payment of receivables and financial compensation for the use of water from these reservoirs, and the reimbursement of damages related to nonpayment in due course.

The Company understands that no amounts are due for the use of these reservoirs.  However,reservoirs but it is responsible for their maintenance and operating costs.  If these reservoirs are not available by the Company it may need to collect water in more distant places and there could be the risk of making services in the region unfeasible and increasing sourcing cost.

Three lawsuits were filed, two of them requesting injunctions to toll the statute of limitations and another to seek a decision by arbitration, as prescribed by an arbitration clause in the agreement entered into between the São Paulo State Government and another electric company, in 1958, which we claim we are responsible for maintaining and meetingnot bound to as our predecessor only participated as an intervening party.

In February 2012, the operating costs of these reservoirs.  If these facilities had not been made available for our use, we would have haddecision to obtain water from more distant sources, which would be more costly.  The State does not incur operating costs on our behalf.

The arrangement for use of the Billings and Guarapiranga reservoirs is provided for through a grant issuedsubmit to arbitration was established by the DAEE.  We havejudge during the first hearing, which is subject to appeal. Notwithstanding, if an arbitration proceeding is filed, we will take all available judicial actions to defend our position.  The Company’s management assessed this risk as a rightpossible loss, and believes it is not possible to use these reservoirs so long as we remain responsible for maintaining and meeting their operating costs.estimate the total amount involved in this process since the extent was not determined.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items in our statement of operations, each expressed as a percentage of net operating revenues:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

 

(in millions ofreais, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating revenues

10,754.4

100.0%

9,941.6

100.0%

9,231.0

100.0%

Cost of sales and services

(6,465.4)

(60.1)%

(6,031.1)

(60.7%)

(5,194.5)

(56.3)%

Gross profit

4,289.0

39.9%

3,910.5

39.3%

4,036.5

43.7%

Selling expenses

(697.8)

(6.5)%

(619.5)

(6.2%)

(712.9)

(7.7)%

Administrative expenses

(726.1)

(6.7)%

(846.6)

(8.5%)

(653.2)

(7.1)%

Other operating income (expenses), net

(19.8)

(0.2)%

(90.1)

(0.9%)

1.8

-

Operating profit

2,845.3

26.5%

2,354.3

23.7%

2,672.2

28.9%

Financial income (expenses), net

(301.4)

(2.8)%

(633.6)

(6.4%)

(379.4)

(4.1)%

Profit before income tax and social contribution

2,543.9

23.7%

1,720.7

17.3%

2,292.8

24.8%

Income tax and social contribution

(632.0)

(5.9)%

(497.3)

(5.0%)

(662.3)

(7.2)%

Net income for the year

1,911.9

17.8%

1,223.4

12.3%

1,630.5

17.7%

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Net operating revenues

Net operating revenues increased by R$812.8 million, or 8.2%, to R$10,754.4 million in 2012 from R$9,941.6 million in 2011.

78


Net operating revenues relating to water services increased by R$310.0 million, or 7.3%, to R$4,585.6 million in 2012 from R$4,275.6 million in 2011.  This increase was principally due to:

·an average 2.4% increase in the volume of water invoiced in 2012; and

·the effect of the 6.83% tariff increase in September 2011, and the 5.15% tariff increase in September 2012.

Net operating revenues relating to sewage services increased by R$263.0, or 7.7%, to R$3,694.2 million in 2012 from R$3,431.2 million in 2011.  This increase was principally due to:

·an average 3.2% increase in the volume of sewage services invoiced in 2012; and

·the effect of the 6.83% tariff increase in September 2011, and the 5.15% tariff increase in September 2012.

Gross revenue from construction increased by R$239.8 million, or 10.7%, to R$2,474.6 million in 2012 from R$2,234.8 million in 2011.  See Note 2.5(b) to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 for a description of the accounting policies applicable to our construction services business.

Cost of Sales and Services

The cost of sales and services increased by R$434.3 million, or 7.2%, to R$6,465.4 million in 2012 from R$6,031.1 million in 2011.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, cost of sales and services decreased to 60.1% in 2012 from 60.7% in 2011.

The increase in costs of sales and services was principally due to the following factors:

·an increase in construction costs of R$237.5 million, or 10.9%, compared with the previous year.  Such change was mainly due to higher investment in 2012;

·an increase of R$80.1 million, or 6.8%, in salaries and related charges due to the following factors:  (i) an increase of 6.17% in salaries since May 2012, resulting in an increase of approximately R$88.7 million; and (ii) an increase in the provision we made for termination benefits, in the amount of R$17.2 million, due to a higher number of employees requesting retirement and the adoption of a new law, which increased the required notice from 30 to 90 days in cases of dismissal without cause.  These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the actual cost with respect to the actuarial calculation in 2012 related to our defined contribution plan in the amount of R$12.5 million;

·an increase of R$56.5 million, or 8.4%, in costs of outsourced services, mainly due to:  (i) vehicle rentals in the amount of R$22.9 million;  (ii) the R$17.0 million increase in the Alto Tietê PPP due to the initiation of operations in September 2011; (iii) services of maintenance and repositioning of pavement in the amount of R$13.7 million, as part of intensified efforts to prevent water losses; (iv) expenses related to the security of our assets in the amount of $14.9 million, due to increases in equipment purchases and areas being monitored; and (v) water and sewage systems maintenance, which amounted to R$5.9 million.  The increase in costs of outsourced services was partially offset by a decrease of R$19.7 million related to socio‑environmental programs established pursuant to an agreement with the municipality of São Paulo;

·an increase of R$31.7 million, or 8.6%, in general expenses, mainly due to:  (i) the R$22.1 million provision pursuant to our service agreement with the municipality of São Paulo and (ii) beginning in February 2012, charges for water usage in the Baixada Santista reservoir, amounting to R$6.9 million;

·an increase of R$23.1 million, or 14.9%, in water-treatment expenses, mainly due to increased consumption and the substitution of water-treatment products in order to meet increased demand while maintaining the same efficiency levels in water treatment;

79


·an increase of R$21.9 million, or 14.9%, in maintenance expenses, mainly due to:  (i) preventive and corrective maintenance of the water and sewage operation systems in the amount of R$8.7 million and (ii) maintenance of water and sewage network connections in the amount of R$7.2 million; and

·an increase of R$6.1 million, or 1%, in the cost of electricity due to increased consumption and higher energy tariffs.  This increased consumption and increase in tariffs was partially offset by a discount of 15%, on the fees for usage of distribution systems related to basic sanitation applied since September 2011.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of R$22.5 million, or 3.0%, in depreciation and amortization expenses, which decreased from R$739.1 million to R$716.6 million, mainly due to the revision in the amortization criteria occurred in 2011 of intangible assets in connection with our service agreement with the municipality of São Paulo.

Gross Profit

As a result of the factors discussed above, gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012increased by R$378.5 million, or 9.7%, from R$3,910.5 million in 2011 to R$4,289.0 million in 2012.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, gross profit increased to 39.9% in 2012 from 39.3% in 2011.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses increased by R$78.3 million, or 12.6%, to R$697.8 million in 2012 from R$619.5 million in 2011.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, selling expenses increased to 6.49% in 2012 from 6.2% in 2011.

The increase in selling expenses was principally due to the following factors:

·an increase of R$71.9 million, or 59.7%, from R$120.4 million in 2011 to R$192.3 million in 2012, mainly due to account receivables allowance for losses.  This increase was due mainly to additional provisions of R$14.4 million related to private clients, R$8.8 million related to municipal entities and R$35.1 million related to state entities;

·an increase of R$3.6 million or 1.8%, in expenses related to outsourced services mainly due to new billing technology related to the reading of usage, issuance of bills and delivering bills, which cost approximately R$11.3 million, in addition to an increase in the number of connections and inflation adjustments of the contracts in the metropolitan region of São Paulo.  This increase was partially offset by:  a decrease of R$4.5 million resulting from reduced services provided related to the implementation of the Rationed Water Use Program (“Programa de Uso Racional da Água” or“PURA”) in city schools; and

·an increase of R$2.2 million, or 1.1%, in personnel salaries and related charges as a result of:  a 6.17% salary readjustments as of May 2011, which had an impact of approximately R$2.7 million.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses decreased by R$120.5 million, or 14.2%, to R$726.1 million in 2012 from R$846.6 million in 2011.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, administrative expenses decreased to 6.7% in 2012 from 8.5% in 2011.

The decrease in administrative expenses was principally due to the following factors:

·a decrease of R$146.5 million, or 34.6%, in salaries and related charges, mainly due to (i) the recognition of an actuarial liability in 2011 in the amount of R$157.5 million related to the supplementary pension plan (plan G0) of the State of São Paulo;

·a decrease of R$6.7 million, or 30.3%, in amortization costs of software in 2012.

The decrease was partially offset by the following:

80


·an increase in service expenses in the amount of R$22.9 million, or 18.2%, mainly on services provided by third parties relating to:  (i) advertising campaigns focused on socio-environmental programs, in the amount of R$16.7 million and (ii) engagement of consultants and specialized service providers, in the amount of R$5.6 million;

·an increase in tax expenses in the amount of R$7.4 million, or 12.0%, due to:  (i) R$3.7 million in property taxes and (ii) regulatory tax to ARSESP in the amount of R$3.2 million.

Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating income (expenses), net, decreased by R$70.3 million, or 78.0%, to R$19.8 million expense in 2012 from R$90.1 million expense in 2011.  Other operating expenses showed a decrease of R$71.1 million, or 43.7%, mainly due to:  (i) provision for losses related to an indemnificatory liability related to the concession for the municipality of Mauá in the amount of R$85.9 million in 2011, (ii) asset write‑offs in 2011 related to asset obsolescence, in the amount of R$35.3 million, and (iii) write-offs in 2011 relating to studies and projects that were not economically viable in the amount of R$6.1 million.  These decreases were partly offset by the provision for losses for the indemnification of assets related to the concession for the municipality of Diadema, in the amount of R$60.3 million in 2012.

Financial income (expenses), net

Financial income (expenses), net, consists primarily of interest on our indebtedness and foreign exchange losses (or gains) in respect of our indebtedness, offset partially by interest income on cash and cash equivalents and inflation based indexation accruals, mainly relating to agreements entered into with some customers to settle overdue accounts receivable.

Financial income (expenses), net decreased by R$332.2 million, or 52.4%, to a R$301.4 million expense in 2012 from a R$633.6 million expense in 2011.  As a percentage of net revenues from sales and services:services, financial income (expenses), net decreased to 2.80% in 2012 from 6.4% in 2011.

The decrease in financial income (expenses), net was principally due to:

·a decrease in foreign exchange loss related to loans and financing of R$331.8 million as a result of the 8.9% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2012, compared to a depreciation of 12.6% of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2011, and the 2.4% appreciation of therealagainst the Japanese Yen in 2012, compared to a depreciation of 18.6% of therealagainst the Japanese Yen in 2011; 

·a decrease of R$48.7 million in interest expenses mainly due to the amortization of our eighth, ninth and thirteenth debentures in June and October 2011, and February 2012, respectively;

·a decrease of R$46.4 million in expenses relating to judicial proceedings mostly involving clients; and

·a decrease of R$36.3 million in inflation adjustments, mainly relating to our contracts with municipalities.

The decrease in financial income (expenses), net was partially offset by:

·a decrease in interest rates related to our cash positions, in the amount of R$108.5 million, or 39.9%; and

·a decrease of R$22.8 million in the inflation adjustments, mainly due to amounts received as a result of the concession of the exclusive rights concerning the deposit of salaries of our employees in 2011.

Profit before income tax and social contribution

As a result of the factors discussed above, income before income taxes increased by 47.8%, to R$2,543.9 million in 2012 from R$1,720.7 million in 2011.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, our income before income taxes increased to 23.7% in 2012 from 17.3% in 2011.

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2009

2010

2011

 

(in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Net revenue from sales and services

8,579.5

100.0%

9,231.0

100.0%

9,941.6

100.0%

Cost of sales and services

(5,087.3)

(59.3)%

(5,194.5)

(56.3)%

(6,031.1)

(60.7%)

Gross profit

3,492.2

40.7%

4,036.5

43.7%

3,910.5

39.3%

Selling expenses

(610.4)

(7.1)%

(712.9)

(7.7)%

(619.5)

(6.2%)

Administrative expenses

(717.1)

(8.4)%

(653.2)

(7.1)%

(846.6)

(8.5%)

Other operating income (expenses), net

(44.4)

(0.5)%

1.8

(90.1)

(0.9%)

Operating profit

2,120.3

24.7%

2,672.2

28.9%

2,354.3

23.7%

Finance cost, net

(10.0)

(0.1)%

(379.4)

(4.1)%

(633.6)

(6.4%)

Profit before income tax and social contribution

2,110.3

24.6%

2,292.8

24.8%

1,720.7

17.3%

Income tax and social contribution

(602.6)

(7.0)%

(662.3)

(7.2)%

(497.3)

(5.0%)

Net income for the year

1,507.7

17.6%

1,630.5

17.7%

1,223.4

12.3%

81


Income Taxes and Social Contribution

Income taxes increased by R$134.7 million, or 27.1%, to R$632.0 million in 2012 from R$497.3 million in 2011.  This increase was principally due to a higher taxable income in 2012.

Net Income for the year

As a result of the factors discussed above, net income increased to R$1,911.9 million in 2012 from R$1,223.4 million in 2011.  As a percentage of net operating revenues, our net income increased to 17.8% in 2012 from 12.3% in 2011.

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010

Net Revenue from Sales and Servicesoperating revenues

Net revenue from sales and servicesoperating revenues increased by R$710.6 million, or 7.7%, to R$9,941.6 million in 2011 from R$9,231.0 million in 2010.

Net operating revenues relating to water services increased by R$332.7 million, or 8.4%, to R$4,275.6 million in 2011 from R$3,942.9 million in 2010.  This increase was principally due to theto:

•      an average 2.6% increase in the volume of water invoiced in 2011; and

•      the effect of the 4.1% tariff rates to 6.83% in September 2011 from 4.05%increase in September 2010, and the 3.1%6.83% tariff increase in sales volume.September 2011.

Net operating revenues relating to sewage services increased by R$273.6 million, or 8.7%, to R$3,431.2 million in 2011 from R$3,157.4 million in 2010.  This increase was principally due to:

•      an average 3.6% increase in the volume of sewage services invoiced in 2011; and

•      the effect of the 4.1% tariff increase in September 2011, and the 6.83% tariff increase in September 2011.

Gross revenue from construction increased by R$104.1 million, or 4.9%, to R$2,234.8 million in 2011 from R$2,130.7 million in 2010.  See Note 2.5(b) to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a description of the accounting policies applicable to our construction services business.

Cost of Sales and Services

The cost of sales and services increased by R$836.6 million, or 16.1%, to R$6,031.1 million in 2011 from R$5,194.5 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, cost of sales and services increased to 60.7% in 2011 from 56.3% in 2010.

The increase in costs of sales and services was principally due to the following factors:

§

·an increase of R$216.2 million, or 41.3%, as a result of our increased amortization expense related to our intangible assets for the services contract entered into with the municipality of São Paulo as well as to 99 expired or informal agreements, which are in the process of being formalized as program agreements.  During 2011, we had a full year of the amortization of intangible assets related to the services contract entered into with the municipality of São Paulo in 2010 and relating to those 99 expired or informal agreements.  Under the aforementioned agreements, the related intangible assets generate greater amortization expense as they are amortized to zero (instead of a residual guaranteed amount reimbursed by the granting municipality at the end of the previous respective concession contracts).  This increase is also due to the beginning of operations in 2011 of sites that had previously been under construction;

·an increase of R$198.9 million, or 20.2%, in salaries and related charges as a result of:  (i) the R$61.2 million adjustment in 2010 of actuarial calculation due to the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan “SabesprevMais”; (ii) an increase of R$18.1 million due to the payment of termination fees related to the FGTS, incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011;(iii) 8% salary readjustments since May 2011, which had a total impact of R$81.3 million; and (iv) the increase of R$21.6 million from the 2011 Cost of Sales and Services figure due to the higher expense relating to the profit sharing program as compared to 2010;

82



 

§an increase of R$198.9 million, or 20.2%, in salaries and related charges as a result of: (i) the R$61.2 million adjustment in 2010 of actuarial calculation due to the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan “SabesprevMais”; (ii) an increase of R$18.1 million due to the payment of termination fees related to the terminated employees security fund (“Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço” or “FGTS”) incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011; (iii) 8% salary readjustments since May 2011, which had a total impact of R$81.3 million; and (iv) the increase of R$21.6 million from the 2011 Cost of Sales and Services figure due to the higher expense relating to the profit sharing program as compared to 2010.
§an increase of R$166.4 million, or 82.1%, in general expenses, mainly due to the R$158.8 million provision (corresponding to 7.5% of the gross revenue of capital after deduction of COFINS and PASEP) pursuant to the agreement with the municipality of São Paulo;
§

·an increase of R$166.4 million, or 82.1%, in general expenses, mainly due to the R$158.8 million provision (corresponding to 7.5% of the gross revenue of capital after deduction of COFINS and PASEP) pursuant to the agreement with the municipality of São Paulo;

·an increase of R$65.1 million, or 10.8%, in costs of outsourced services, mainly due to (i) water and sewage systems maintenance, which amounted to R$16.9 million; (ii) the R$14.7 million increase in the Alto Tietê PPP designated amount for the contract’s second year, and the initiation of operations in September 2011; (iii) maintenance, in the amount of R$9.2 million, of water and sewer networks and connections in order to minimize losses and meet project deadlines set forth by the ARSESP; (iv) the transport of mud in the amount of R$7.1 million as a result of increased demand for water treatment, which causes increased quantities of mud to be transported; (v) an increase of R$6.3 million resulting from socio‑environmental services established together with the municipality of São Paulo; (vi) R$4.4 million in costs related to mail and telegrams for the delivery of water bills in certain areas via post following judicial decisions; and (vii) vehicle rentals in the amount of R$2.8 million as part of the second phase of the renovation of our fleet.  The increase in costs of outsourced services was partially offset by a decrease in telephone and data transmission charges in the amount of R$5.7 million, mainly due to the execution of a contract with Telecomunicações de São Paulo S.A., which involves landlines and long‑distance data transfers as well as corporate cellular phones at lower costs to us;

·an increase of R$53.9 million, or 10.2%, in the cost of electric energy due to the increase in consumption and higher energy tariffs;

·an increase of R$18.3 million, or 13.4%, in water‑treatment products, mainly due to:  (i) an increase of approximately 43% in the consumption of polyaluminium chloride, readjusted by approximately 11%.  This product was used principally in the Guaraú water treatment station in place of aluminum sulfate, guaranteeing maximum outflow without compromising the quality of the treated water.  This increase was partially offset on R$2.0 million by the decrease of the use of activated charcoal due to climate conditions, as well as due to the decelerated proliferation of algae in the reservoirs of the Alto Tietê System and Guarapiranga/Billings;

·an increase of R$12.4 million, or 9.1%, in product‑related expenses, mainly due to connection with the maintenance of our water and sewer structure (in the amount of R$7.4 million) and with the increased expenses with fuel and lubricants for vehicles (in the amount of R$1.8 million), resulting from socio-environmental services established together with the municipality of São Paulo; (vi) R$4.4 million in costs related to mail and telegrams for the delivery of water bills in certain areas via post following judicial decisions; and (vii) vehicle rentals in the amount of R$2.8 million as part of the second phase of the renovation of our fleet.  The increase in costs of outsourced services was partially offset by a decrease in telephone and data transmission charges in the amount of R$5.7 million, mainly due to the execution of a contract with Telecomunicações de São Paulo S.A. (“TELESP”), which involves landlines and long-distance data transfers as well as corporate cellular phones at lower costs to us.

§an increase of R$53.9 million, or 10.2%, in the cost of electric energy due to the increase in consumption and higher energy tariffs.
§an increase of R$18.3 million, or 13.4%, in water-treatment products, mainly due to: (i) an increase of approximately 43% in the consumption of polyaluminium chloride, readjusted by approximately 11%.  This product was used principally in the Guaraú water treatment station in place of aluminum sulfate, guaranteeing maximum outflow without compromising the quality of the treated water.  This increase was partially offset on R$2.0 million by the decrease of the use of activated charcoal due to climate conditions, as well as due to the decelerated proliferation of algae in the reservoirs of the Alto Tietê System and Guarapiranga/Billings.
§an increase of R$12.4 million, or 9.1%, in product-related expenses, mainly in connection with the maintenance of our water and sewer structure (in the amount of R$7.4 million) and with the increased expenses with fuel and lubricants for vehicles (in the amount of R$1.8 million), resulted from an increase of 22% in the fuel price and from the expansion of our vehicle fleet.

Gross Profit

As a result of the factors discussed above, gross profit decreased by R$126.0 million, or 3.1%, to R$3,910.5 million in 2011 from R$4,036.5 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services,operating revenues, gross profit decreased to 39.3% in 2011 from 43.7% in 2010.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses decreased by R$93.4 million, or 13.1%, to R$619.5 million in 2011 from R$712.9 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services,operating revenues, selling expenses decreased to 6.2% in 2011 from 7.7% in 2010.


The decrease in selling expenses was primarily due to the following factors:

§a decrease of R$112.1 million, or 48.2%, in credit write-offs, mainly as a result of additional provisions established in 2010 of R$34.2 million related to private clients and R$139.1 million related to public municipal entities (R$54.8 million of which related to the municipality of São Paulo);
§a decrease of R$14.1 million, or 6.5%, in expenses with outsourced services mainly related to the agreement with municipality of São Paulo and the R$34.4 million decrease in the provision established in 2011 for new services to be provided under that agreement, and a R$4.9 million increase resulting from services provided to satisfy the schedule for implementing the Rationed Water Use Program (“Programa de Uso Racional da Água” or“PURA”) in city schools.  This decrease was partially offset by the following increases: (i) R$11.1 million in billing services, mainly resulting from new billing technology related to the reading of usage, issuance of bills and delivering bills, in addition to an increase in the number of connections and adjustments of  the contracts in the metropolitan region of São Paulo; and (ii) expenses in the amount of R$3.3 million relating to services for the collection of credits.
§an increase of R$19.1 million, or 10.4 %, in the personel salaries and related charges as a result of: (i) the R$ 9.3 million adjustment in 2010 of the actuarial calculation  due to the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan "Sabesprev Mais"; (ii) a R$ 1.4 million increase due to the payment of termination fees related to the terminated employees security fund ("Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço") incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011; (iii) 8% salary readjustments since may 2011, which had a total impact of R$ 3.9 million.
§an increase of R$9.1 million, or 13.0%, in general expenses, mainly due to (i) water bills for banking institutions in the amount of R$4.2 million; and (ii) the R$3.3 million increase in tax provisions relating to the services rendered in the cities of São José dos Campos, Pindamonhangaba and Botucatu, resulting from increased collection during 2011 as compared to 2010;
§

·a decrease of R$112.1 million, or 48.2%, in credit write‑offs, mainly as a result of additional provisions established in 2010 of R$34.2 million related to private clients and R$139.1 million related to public municipal entities (R$54.8 million of which related to the municipality of São Paulo);

83


·a decrease of R$14.1 million, or 6.5%, in expenses with outsourced services mainly related to the agreement with the municipality of São Paulo and the R$34.4 million decrease in the provision established in 2011 for new services to be provided under that agreement, and a R$4.9 million increase resulting from services provided to satisfy the schedule for implementing the Rationed Water Use Program (“Programa de Uso Racional da Água” or “PURA”) in city schools.  This decrease was partially offset by the following increases:  (i) R$11.1 million in billing services, mainly resulting from new billing technology related to the reading of usage, issuance of bills and delivering bills, in addition to an increase in the number of connections and adjustments of the contracts in the metropolitan region of São Paulo; and (ii) expenses in the amount of R$3.3 million relating to services for the collection of credits;

·an increase of R$19.1 million, or 10.4 %, in personnel salaries and related charges as a result of:  (i) the R$9.3 million adjustment in 2010 of the actuarial calculation due to the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan “Sabesprev Mais”; (ii) a R$1.4 million increase due to the payment of termination fees related to the FGTS, incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011; and (iii) 8% salary readjustments since May 2011, which had a total impact of R$3.9 million;

·an increase of R$9.1 million, or 13.0%, in general expenses, mainly due to (i) water bills for banking institutions in the amount of R$4.2 million; and (ii) the R$3.3 million increase in tax provisions relating to the services rendered in the cities of São José dos Campos, Pindamonhangaba and Botucatu, resulting from increased collection during 2011 as compared to 2010;

·an increase of R$3.5 million, or 89.6%, in depreciation and amortization expenses, mainly due to the adjustment in amortization of intangible assets in connection with the agreement with the municipality of São Paulo.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses increased by R$193.4 million, or 29.6%, to R$846.6 million in 2011 from R$653.2 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services,operating revenues, administrative expenses increased to 8.5% in 2011 from 7.1% in 2010.

The increase in administrative expenses was primarily due to:

§an increase of R$187.4 million, or 79.6%, in salaries and related charges, mainly due to (i) the covering of actuarial liability in the amount of R$157.5 million related to the supplementary pension plan (plan G0) of the State of São Paulo (based on the non-recurring actuarial calculation performed on December 31, 2010); (ii) the cover of actuarial liability in the amount of R$22.2 million related to the supplementary pension plan (plan G0) of the State of São Paulo for 2011; (iii) a R$3.0 million increase due to the payment of termination fees related to the terminated employees security fund (“Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço” or “FGTS”) incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011; and (iv) 8% salary readjustments since May 2011, which had the total impact of R$9.1 million;
§an increase of R$36.7 million, or 21.3%, in general expenses due to (i) the need for larger contingency provisions in the amount of R$59.7 million, particularly in connection with environmental issues in the municipalities of Guareí and Paraguaçu Paulista.  This increase was partially offset by the R$17.9 million provisioning made in 2010 for losses relating to third party claims;
§a decrease of R$24.8 million, or 16.5%, in services provided by third parties in connection with a variety of matters, including: (i) a decrease of R$18.4 million in advertisement campaigns due to the termination of certain advertisement agreements; (ii) a R$5.5 million decrease due to reorganization and management performance related to the work of consultants and specialized service providers;


§·an increase of R$187.4 million, or 79.6%, in salaries and related charges, mainly due to (i) the covering of actuarial liability in the amount of R$157.5 million related to the supplementary pension plan (plan G0) of the State of São Paulo (based on the non‑recurring actuarial calculation performed on December 31, 2010); (ii) the cover of actuarial liability in the amount of R$22.2 million related to the supplementary pension plan (plan G0) of the State of São Paulo for 2011; (iii) a R$3.0 million increase due to the payment of termination fees related to the FGTS, incurred as a result of increased layoffs in 2011; and (iv) 8% salary readjustments since May 2011, which had the total impact of R$9.1 million;

·an increase of R$36.7 million, or 21.3%, in general expenses due to (i) the need for larger contingency provisions in the amount of R$59.7 million, particularly in connection with environmental issues in the municipalities of Guareí and Paraguaçu Paulista.  This increase was partially offset by the R$17.9 million provisioning made in 2010 for losses relating to third party claims;

·a decrease of R$24.8 million, or 16.5%, in services provided by third parties in connection with a variety of matters, including:  (i) a decrease of R$18.4 million in advertisement campaigns due to the termination of certain advertisement agreements; and (ii) a R$5.5 million decrease due to reorganization and management performance related to the work of consultants and specialized service providers;

·        a decrease of R$3.1 million, or 12.2%, in depreciation expenses due to the decreased immobilized assets of the controlling shareholder.

84


Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating income (expenses), net decreased by R$91.9 million in 2011, to R$90.1 million expense in 2011 from R$1.8 million income in 2010.  This increase was primarily due to the provision made in the amount of R$85.9 million related to assets used for our concession in the municipality of Mauá, and to the write-offwrite‑off of assets in the amount of R$35.3 million.

Finance Cost, Net

Finance cost, net, consists primarily of interest on our indebtedness and foreign exchange losses (or gains) in respect of our indebtedness, offset partially by interest income on cash and cash equivalents and inflation based indexation accruals, mainly relating to agreements entered into with some customers to settle overdue accounts receivable.

Finance cost, net increased by R$254.2 million, or 67.0%, to R$633.6 million in 2011 from R$379.4 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenues from sales and services, finance cost, net increased to 6.4% in 2011 from 4.1% in 2010.

The increase was principally due to:

§an increase in foreign exchange loss related to loans and financing of R$448.5 million as a result of the 12.6% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2011, compared to an appreciation of 4.3% of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2010;
§a decrease of R$46.0 million in monetary indexation, mainly due to (i) a higher expense in 2010 amounting to R$20.0 million, due to the alteration of the unit price of our eleventh debentures issuance between their issuance date and their effective offering date in 2010; (ii) the depreciation of therealagainst the Japanese Yen upon the disbursement by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) of R$14.0 million in 2011; and (iv) a decrease in the volume of refinancing of debt in 2011 as compared to 2010, amounting to a decrease of R$12.0 million;and
§

·an increase in foreign exchange loss related to loans and financing of R$448.5 million as a result of the 12.6% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2011, compared to an appreciation of 4.3% of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2010;

·a decrease of R$46.0 million in monetary indexation, mainly due to (i) a higher expense in 2010 amounting to R$20.0 million, due to the alteration of the unit price of our eleventh debentures issuance between their issuance date and their effective offering date in 2010; (ii) the depreciation of therealagainst the Japanese Yen upon the disbursement by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) of R$14.0 million in 2011; and (iii) a decrease in the volume of refinancing of debt in 2011 as compared to 2010, amounting to a decrease of R$12.0 million; and

·other monetary revisions relating to our contracts in the amount of R$41.2 million.

The increase in finance cost, net was partially offset by:

§·        an increase of R$153.5 million in interest income and other financial income due to the increase in our cash and cash equivalents;

§·        a decrease of R$95.5 million in financial expenses relating to judicial proceedings as a result of the lower interest income regarding the proceedings involving clients and service providers in 2011; and

§·        a decrease of R$33.6 million in interest expenses mainly due to the amortization of our eighth and ninth debentures in June and October 2011, respectively.

Income before Income Taxes

As a result of the factors discussed above, income before income taxes decreased by R$572.1 million, or 24.9%, to R$1,720.7 million in 2011 from R$2,292.8 million in 2010.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services,operating revenues, our income before income taxes increaseddecreased to 17.3% in 2011 from 24.8% in 2010.

Income Taxes

Income taxes decreased by R$165.0 million, or 24.9%, to R$497.3 million in 2011 from R$662.3 million in 2010.  The increasedecrease was primarily due to a decrease in taxable income in 2011.

85


Net Income

As a result of the factors discussed above, net income decreased to R$1,223.4 million in 2011 from R$1,630.5 million in 2010.  Net profit margin decreased to 12.3% in 2011 from 17.7% in 2010.


Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009

Net Revenue from Sales and Services

Net revenue from sales and services increased by R$651.5 million, or 7.6%, to R$9,231.0 million in 2010 from R$8,579.5 million in 2009. 

Net revenue from sales and services relating to water services increased by R$125.4 million, or 3.3%, to R$3,942.9 million in 2010 from R$3,817.5 million in 2009.  This increase was principally due to:

§an average 3.8% increase in the volume of water invoiced 2010; and
§the effect of the 4.43% tariff increase in September 2009, and the 4.1% tariff increase in September 2010.

Net revenue from sales and services relating to sewage services increased by R$244.5 million, or 8.4%, to R$3,157.5 million in 2010 from R$2,913.0 million in 2009.  This increase was principally due to:

§an average 4.5% increase in the volume of sewage services invoiced in 2010; and
§the effects of the 4.43% tariff increase in September 2009 and the 4.1% tariff increase in September 2010.

Gross revenue from construction increased by R$90.9 million, or 4.5%, to R$2,130.7 million in 2010 from R$2,039.8 million in 2009.

Cost of Sales and Services

The cost of sales and services increased by R$107.2 million, or 2.1%, to R$5,194.5 million in 2010 from R$5,087.3 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, cost of sales and services decreased to 56.3% in 2010 from 59.3% in 2009.

The increase in costs of sales and services was principally due to the following factors:

§an increase of R$157.6 million, or 349.3%, in general costs on the provision of water and sewage services, of which R$167.2 million relates to a fee to the Fund of Environmental Sanitation and Infrastructure of the municipality of São Paulo which had to be paid according to the terms of the agreement with the State and the city of São Paulo executed on June 23, 2010.  This fee represents 7.5% of the gross revenue of the São Paulo municipality as from the date of execution of the agreement;
§an increase of R$71.4 million in construction costs in 2010;
§an increase of R$51.2 million, or 9.3%, in outsourced services, mainly due to (i) the maintenance of water and sewage structure amounting to R$18.4 million, (ii) pavement and maintenance of side-walks amounting to R$14.2 million, and (iii) transportation of water and mud amounting to R$8.4 million; and
§an increase of R$45.8 million, or 9.5%, in the electricity expense mainly due to (i) an increase of 5.2% in the electricity tariff, and (ii) an increase of 1.9% in the electricity consumption.

The increase in costs of sales and services was partially offset by:

§a decrease of R$196.8 million, or 16.7%, in salaries and related charges, mainly due to (i) a R$113.5 million decrease as a result of the reduction in our staff pursuant to the TAC, with the State Public Attorney’s Office (Ministério Público Estadual).  Pursuant to the TAC, we laid off retirees who were still working for us and laid off approximately 2% of our workforce; (ii) decrease in actuarial liability due to the migration from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan amounting to R$79.3 million and (iii) a decrease of R$13.6 million related to adjustment in the profit sharing program for 2010;
§a decrease of R$14.7 million, or 2.7%, in depreciation and amortization expenses.


Gross Profit

As a result of the factors discussed above, gross profit increased by R$544.3 million, or 15.6%, to R$4,036.5 million in 2010 from R$3,492.2 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, gross profit increased to 43.7% in 2010 from 40.7% in 2009.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses increased by R$102.5 million, or 16.8%, to R$712.9 million in 2010 from R$610.4 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, selling expenses increased to 7.7% in 2010 from 7.1% in 2009.

The increase in selling expenses was primarily due to the following factors:

§an increase of R$115.1 million, or 98.1%, in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to municipal public entities; and
§an increase of R$11.8 million, or 5.8%, in outsourced services expenses, principally due to (i) a R$9.7 million provision related to future payment to the City Hall of São Paulo (Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo), or PMSP, pursuant to the agreement we entered into with PMSP on June 23, 2010; (ii) R$9.4 million in billing services, mainly related to an increase in network connections and the utilization of new technologies, which resulted in an increase in outsourcing expenses; and (iii) R$4.7 million related to increase in fraud control expenses.

The increase in selling expenses was partially offset by a R$28.2 million, or 13.3%, decrease in salaries and related charges in 2010, due mainly to:  (i) the reduction in our staff pursuant to the TAC, which resulted in a decrease of R$15.5 million in 2010; (ii) gain from the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan “SabesprevMais” amounting to R$13.3 million; and (iii) R$13.8 million decrease resulting from the implementation of the PURA program.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses decreased by R$63.9 million, or 8.9%, to R$653.2 million in 2010 from R$717.1 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, administrative expenses decreased to 7.1% in 2010 from 8.4% in 2009.

The decrease in administrative expenses was primarily due to:

§a decrease of R$96.8 million, or 36.0%, in general expenses due to a reduction in contingency provisions mainly related to customer claims in 2010;

§a decrease of R$11.5 million in termination expenses resulting from the 2009 staff reduction pursuant to the TAC; and

§a decrease of R$13.9 million in actuarial calculation due to the migration of employees from defined benefit plan to defined contribution plan “SabesprevMais.”  

The decrease in administrative expenses was partially offset by:

§an increase in actuarial liability related to the payment by us on behalf of the State of São Paulo of pension plan (plan G0) amounting to R$31.7 million due to a decrease in the discount rate from 6.6% to 6.0%;

§an increase of R$19.2 million related to the deficit in defined benefit plan, paid to the employees who migrated to the defined contribution plan “SabesprevMais.”  

Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating income (expenses), net increased to R$1.8 million income in 2010 from R$44.4 million expenses in 2009.  The increase was due to the reclassification of the expenses related to the pension plan paid by us on behalf of the State of São Paulo (plan G0), which had been recorded as other operating expenses, net 2009, as administrative expenses in 2010.


Finance Cost, Net

Finance cost, net, consists primarily of interest on our indebtedness and foreign exchange losses (or gains) in respect of our indebtedness, offset partially by interest income on cash and cash equivalents and inflation based indexation accruals, mainly relating to agreements entered into with some customers to settle overdue accounts receivable.

Finance cost, net increased by R$369.4 million, or 3,694.0%, to R$379.4 million in 2010 from R$10.0 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenues from sales and services, finance cost, net increased to 4.1% in 2010 from 0.1% in 2009.

The increase was principally due to:

§an increase in foreign exchange loss related to loans and financing of R$470.6 million as a result of the 4.3% appreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2010, compared to an appreciation of 25.5% of therealagainst the U.S. dollar in 2009;
§an increase in interest expenses of R$91.0 million due to the issuance of (i) our tenth, eleventh and twelfth debentures in November 2009, March 2010 and July 2010, respectively; (ii) our fifth promissory notes in August 2010; and
§an increase of R$85.9 million in expenses from monetary indexation resulting mainly from the increase in the IGP-M rate of 11.3% in 2010 compared to its decrease of 1.7% in 2009.

The increase in finance cost, net was partially offset by:

§a decrease of R$158.7 million in expenses related to the adjustment for inflation of our provision for contingency due to a decrease in the inflation rate;
§an increase of R$65.2 million in financial income mainly due to (i) the renegotiation of debts with certain municipalities, mainly Taubaté and Ferraz de Vasconcelos, and (ii) the adjustment for inflation of court deposits; and
§an increase of R$59.3 million in interest and other financial income due to the increase in cash and cash equivalents.

Income before Income Taxes

As a result of the factors discussed above, income before income taxes increased by R$182.5 million, or 8.6%, to R$2,292.8 million in 2010 from R$2,110.3 million in 2009.  As a percentage of net revenue from sales and services, our income before income taxes increased to 24.8% in 2010 from 24.6% in 2009.

Income Taxes

Income taxes increased by R$59.7 million, or 9.9%, to R$662.3 million in 2010 from R$602.6 million in 2009.  The increase was primarily due to the increase in our income before income taxes in 2010.

Net Income

As a result of the factors discussed above, net income increased by R$122.8 million, or 8.1%, to R$1,630.5 million in 2010 from R$1,507.7 million in 2009.

B.Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Sources

In order to satisfy our liquidity and capital requirements, we have primarily relied on cash provided by operating activities, long-term borrowings from Brazilian federal and state governmental financial institutions, and long-term financing from multilateral organizations and from domestic and international development banks, and also from capital markets.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had R$2,150.01,921.2 million of cash and cash equivalents.  Outstanding short-termThe outstanding current portion of our long-term indebtedness was R$1,630.01,367.4 million as of December 31, 2011,2012, of which R$189.4197.7 million was denominated in foreign currency.  Long-termLong‑term indebtedness was R$6,966.37,701.9 million as of December 31, 2011,2012, of which R$2,864.03,018.1 million consisted of foreign currency-denominated obligations.  We believe that we have sufficient sources of liquidity and capital to meet our liquidity and capital requirements for the next few years, in light of our current financial position and our expected cash generated by operating activities.


Cash Flow

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities is the single largest source of our liquidity and capital resources, and we anticipate that it will continue to be so in the future.  Our cash generated by operating activities was R$2,072.52,336.2 million, R$2,717.1 million and R$2,083.0 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The main driver of our cash flow from operating activities relates to our strong revenue stream, which is due to the fact we are expanding our infrastructure.

Cash Used in Investing Activities

Our cash used in investing activities was R$1,998.8 million, R$2,008.3 million and R$2,717.12,091.4 million in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The main driver of our cash flow from investing activities relates to the purchases of intangibles assets, as required under our concession and program contracts, which is due to the fact that the we are expanding our infrastructure.

Cash Used in Financing Activities

Our cash used in financing activities was R$566.3 million, R$548.0 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

We have overdue accounts receivablerespectively, and our cash provided by our finaning activities was R$1,226.5 million in 2010. The main driver of our cash flow from financing activities relates to the Stateproceeds and fromrepayments of loans used to finance purchases of intangible assets related to our concession and program contracts, in order to support the municipalities to which we provide waterexpansion of our services and our payment of interest on a wholesale basis.  For more information, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions.”shareholders’equity.

Indebtedness Financing

Our total financial indebtedness increased by 4.0%5.5%, from R$8,264.6 million as of December 31, 2010 to R$8,596.3 million as of December 31, 2011.2011 to R$9,069.3 as of December 31, 2012.  In addition, during the same period, our total foreign denominated indebtedness recorded increased 35.8%by 5.3%, from R$2,248.9 million as of December 31, 2010 to R$3,053.4 million as of December 31, 2011 to R$3,215.8 as of December 31, 2012, mainly related to investments fromloan agreement 2,202/OC‑BR with Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) to finance the Japan International Cooperation Agency, orthird stage of the JICA, amounting to 19,169.0 million Yens or R$ 375.9 million, which will be invested in the Metropolitan Coastal Region.  We also made significant amortization payments relating to certain Brazilian and foreign currency-denominated indebtedness.Tietê River Project. 

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had R$6,966.37,701.9 million in long-term indebtedness outstanding (excluding the current portion of long-term indebtedness), of which R$2,864.03,018.1 million consisted of foreign currency-denominated long-term debt.  We had an outstanding short-termcurrent portion of long-term indebtedness of R$1,630.01,367.4 million as of December 31, 2011, representing the current portion of our long-term indebtedness.2012.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, R$189.4197.7 million of this short-termcurrent portion of long-term indebtedness was denominated in foreign currency.  As of December 1, 2011,2012, our Standard & Poor’s Rating Service domestic rating was braAA+brAA+ and our S&P international rating was BB+. 

86


Various contractual agreements we have entered into, including certain financing agreements with Caixa Econômica Federal and the BNDES, provide for liens over a portion of our cash flows from operations.  In addition to Caixa Econômica Federal and the BNDES, we have granted liens over a portion of our cash flows deriving from our operations in connection with agreements relating to securitization transactions, the Alto Tietê PPP and arrangements relating to the lease of certain assets.  Pursuant to these agreements, cash received from operations is required to pass through designated accounts.  In the event of a default under the relevant agreement, such cash and future cash flows that are required to be deposited in such accounts become restricted and are subject to security interests in favor of the relevant creditor.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, a substantial portion of our monthly cash flows from operations was subject to these liens.  As of that date, the total amount of our secured debt, including indebtedness benefiting from these liens, was R$2,546.9million.2,291.1 million.

The following table sets forth information on our indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

As of December 31, 2011

Facility

Current

Long Term

Total Aggregate Principal Amount

Final Maturity

Interest Rate(1)

 

(in millions ofreais)  

 

 

Real-denominated loans and financings:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Government/Banco do Brasil

348.7

479.5

828.2

2014

8.50% plus UPR

Debentures Tenth Issuance

2.0

283.3

285.3

2020

TJLP plus 1.92% (1st and 3rd series) and 9.53% plus IPCA (2nd series)

Debentures Eleventh Issuance

202.5

1,005.7

1,208.2

2015

CDI(3) plus 1.95% (1st series) and CDI plus 1.4% (2nd series)

Debentures Twelfth Issuance

-

499.6

499.6

2025

TR plus 9.5%

Debentures Thirteenth Issuance

599.4

-

599.4

2012

CDI plus 0.65%

Debentures Fourteenth Issuance

-

279.8

279.8

2022

TJLP plus 1.92% and 9.19%

Debentures First Issuance – Aquapolo

-

160.1

160.1

2029

TR plus 8.75%

Caixa Econômica Federal(2)

110.6

917.6

1,028.2

2011/2032

5.0% to 9.5% plus UPR

BNDES

37.6

3.5

41.1

2013

3% plus TJLP (limited to 6.00%)

BNDES (South coast area)

16.3

114.2

130.5

2019

2.5% plus TJLP (limited to 6.00%)

BNDES (PAC)

6.4

67.5

73.9

2023

2.15% plus TJLP (limited to 6.00%)

BNDES (Clean Wave Program)

14.3

235.4

249.7

2025

1.92% plus TJLP (limited to 6.0%)

Financial Leasing

-

49.6

49.6

 

 

Other

1.8

3.5

5.3

2011/2018

12.00%, CDI and TJLP plus 6.00%

Interest and other charges

101.0

2.9

103.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency denominated loans and financings:

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) US$386.9 million

71.6

652.1

723.7

2016/2035

1.14% to 3.29% plus currency basket fluctuation plus U.S. dollar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) US$10.3 million

-

18.9

18.9

2034

0.43%

Eurobonds US$140.0 million

-

262.1

262.1

2016

7.50%

Eurobonds US$350.0 million

-

649.0

649.0

2020

6.30%

JICA Yen 39.5 billion

53.2

905.5

958.7

2029

0.01% to 2.5%

IADB AB Loan Financing US$226.1 million         

44.9

376.4

421.3

2023

2.49% to 2.99%

Interest and Other Charges

19.7

-

19.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Debt

1,630.0

6,966.3

8,596.3

 

 


 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Current

Noncurrent

Total

Final Maturity

 

Denominated in local currency

 

 

 

 

 

Banco do Brasil

380.631

100.306

480.937

2014

UPR + 8.50%

10th issue debentures

36.459

252.166

288.625

2020

TJLP + 1.92% (1st & 3rd series) & IPCA + 9.53% (2nd series)

11th issue debentures

472.500

535.949

1.008.449

2015

DI + 1.95% (1st series) & DI + 1.4% (2nd series)

12th issue debentures

-

499.511

499.511

2025

TR + 9.5%

14th issue debentures

-

284.649

284.649

2022

TJLP + 1.92% (1st & 3rd series) and IPCA + 9.19% (2nd series)

15th issue debentures

-

791.451

791.451

2019

DI + 0.99% (1st series) & IPCA + 6.2% (2nd series)

16th issue debentures

-

499.457

499.457

2015

DI + 0.30% to 0.70%

1st issue debentures – Aquapolo

847

157.020

157.867

2029

TR + 8.75%

Caixa Econômica Federal

117.217

931.004

1.048.221

2011 /2032

UPR + 6.8% (average)

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES)

4.154

-

4.154

2013

3% + TJLP

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) Coastal region

16.309

97.855

114.164

2019

2.5% + TJLP

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) PAC

8.447

80.244

88.691

2023

2.15% + TJLP

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) PAC II 9751

-

6.500

6.500

2027

1.72% + TJLP

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) PAC II 9752

-

13.000

13.000

2027

1.72% + TJLP

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) Onda Limpa

19.230

216.026

235.256

2025

1.92% + TJLP

Financial leasing

-

215.774

215.774

 

 

Other

5.416

2.923

8.339

2011/ 2018/ 2025

TJLP + 6% / 12%

Interest and others charges

108.514

-

108.514

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total denominated in local currency

1.169.724

4.683.835

5.853.559

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominated in foreign currency

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) US$417,295,000 (2011 - US$ 386,862,000)

77.967

770.494

848.461

2017 to 2035

0.99% to 3.00%

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) US$26,864,000 (2011 - US$ 10,316,000)

-

54.492

54.492

2034

0.82%

Eurobonds - US$ 140,000,000 (2011 - US$ 140,000,000)

-

285.655

285.655

2016

7.50%

Eurobonds - US$ 350,000,000 (2011 – US$ 350,000,000)

-

708.076

708.076

2020

6.25%

JICA 15 - ¥ 19,591,310,000 (2011 - ¥ 20,743,740,000)

27.335

437.371

464.706

2029

1.8% & 2.5%

JICA 18 - ¥ 17,614,720,000 (2011 - ¥ 18,650,880,000)

24.578

392.894

417.472

2029

1.8% & 2.5%

JICA 17 - ¥ 324,213,000 (2011 - ¥ 62,292,000)

-

7.524

7.524

2035

1.2% & 0.01%

JICA 19 - ¥ 5,407,000

-

1

1

2037

1.7% & 0.01%

IADB 1983AB - US$ 202,115,000 (2011 - US$ 226,058,000)

48.926

361.587

410.513

2023

2.49% to 2.99%

Interest and others charges

18.861

-

18.861

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total denominated in foreign currency

197.667

3.018.094

3.215.761

 

 

Total loans and financing

1.367.391

7.701.929

9.069.320

 

 

______________

(1)   UPR stands for Standard Reference Unit (Unidade Padrão Referência) and is equal to the TR, which was 0.09%0.00% per month as of December 31, 2011;2012; CDI stands for Interbank Deposit Rate (Certificado de Depósitos Interbancários), which was 10.87%6.90% per annum as of December 31, 2011;2012; IGP-M was 5.1%7.81% per annum as of December 31, 2011;2012; TJLP stands for Long-term Interest Rate (Taxa de Juros a Longo Prazo),published quarterly by the Central Bank, which was 6.0%5.00% per annum as of December 31, 2011.2012.

(2)   This line item represents the aggregate amount outstanding under financing agreements we have entered into with Caixa Econômica Federal, which mature on different dates and bear different interest rates.  The numbers above reflect the range of maturities and the weighted average interest rate under these agreements.

87


The following table shows the maturity profile of our debt, as of December 31, 2011,2012, for the period indicated (in millions of reais)reais):

 

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

After

2017

Total

Loans and financing

1,630.0

1,227.2

744.6

655.4

651.7

3,687.4

8,596.3

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

After 2018

Total

Loans and financing

1,367.4

763.1

1,270.8

790.8

520.2

4,357.0

9,069.3

 

Substantially all of our foreign currency-denominatedcurrency‑denominated indebtedness of R$2,088.02,319.7 million, net of transaction costs, as of December 31, 20112012 was denominated in U.S. dollars or in baskets of foreign currencies.dollars.  This indebtedness consisted principally of:

§R$723.7 million (US$386.9

·R$848.5 million (US$417.3 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans contracted with the Inter-American Development Bank, or the IADB, composed of the following:  (i) loan to finance the first phase of the Tietê Project in 1992 and its second phase in 2000, under which payments of principal are made in semiannual installments with final maturity in July 2025.  The principal amount of this loan is adjusted semiannually for the variation of the U.S. dollar, and accrues interest at a rate varying from 0.99% to 3.00% plus LIBOR; (ii) credit agreement executed in September 2010 with the IADB for the financing of the third phase of the Tietê Project.  This loan matures on September 3, 2035.  Amortizations will be made in semiannual installments after a grace period of six years.  The principal amount accrues interest at LIBOR.  We have pledged as collateral part of our receivables from our sales and services up to the amount due;

·R$54.5 million (US$26.9 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans contracted with the International Bank for Reconstruction Development ‑ IBRD which was entered into on October 28, 2009, amounting to US$100.0 million, for the financing of the Water Source Program (Programa Mananciais).  The loan matures in March 2034.  Amortizations will be in semi‑annual installments starting on September 2019.  The principal amount accrues interest at the USD LIBOR plus a variable spread;

·R$410.5 million (US$202.1 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans from the AB Loan financing contracted with the IADB in May 2008.  Under this loan, payments of principal are made in annual installments with final maturity in May 2023.  The principal amount is adjusted semiannually for the LIBOR plus spread and accrued interest at a rate varying from 1.875% to 2.375%.  This loan was used to repay an outstanding series of debt securities in connection with the implementation of our investment plan; and

·R$993.7 million (US$490.0 million) in U.S. dollar denominated Eurobonds issued in November 2006 (US$140.0 million with an interest rate of 7.5%) and in December 2010 (US$350.0 million with an interest rate of 6.25%).  Under these bonds, the payments of interest are made in semi‑annual installments and principal will be paid at the final maturity in 2016 and 2020, respectively. The proceeds from the offering were used to repay financial commitments throughout 2007 and 2011.

·R$889.7 million (¥37,535.6 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans contracted with the Inter-American Development Bank, or the IADB, composed of the following: (i) loan to finance the first phase of the Tietê Project in 1992 and its second phase in 2000, under which payments of principal are made in semi-annual installments with final maturity in July 2025. The principal amount of this loan is adjusted semi-annually for the variation in a basket of foreign currencies U.S. dollar, and accrues interest at a rate varying from 1.14% to 3.29% plus LIBOR. We have pledged as collateral part of our receivables from our sales and services up to the amount due; (ii) credit agreement executed in September 2010 with the IADB for the financing of the third phase of the Tietê Project. This loan matures on September 3, 2035. Amortizations will be made in semi-annual installments after a grace period of six years. The principal amount accrues interest at the USD LIBOR.

§R$18.9 million (US$10.3 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans from the International Bank for Reconstruction Development - IBRD which was entered into on October 28, 2009, amounting to US$ 100,000 thousand and will be amortized during the period of the contract, for the financing of the Water Source Program (Programa Mananciais). The loan matures in March, 2034. Amortizations will be in semi-annual installments starting on September 2019. The principal amount accrues interest at the USD LIBOR plus a variable spread.
§R$421.3 million (US$226.0 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans from the AB Loan financing contracted with the IADB in May 2008.  Under this loan, payments of principal are made in annual installments with final maturity in May 2023.  The principal amount is adjusted semi-annually for the LIBOR plus spread and accrued interest at a rate varying from 2.49% to 2.99%.  This loan was used to repay an outstanding series of debt securities in connection with the implementation of our investment plan; and
§R$911.1 million (US$490.0 million) in U.S. dollar denominated loans from Eurobonds contracted in November 2006 (US$140.0 million) and in December 2010 (US$350.0 million). Under this loan, payments of interest are made in semi-annual installments and principal will be paid in the end of the contract with final maturities in 2016 and 2020. The interest rate for the November 2006 Eurobonds is 7.5% while for the December 2010 Eurobonds is 6.25%.
§R$ 958.7 million (¥39,437.8 million) in Japanese yen denominated loans contracted with the JICA, composed of the following: (i) ¥21,316.0 million in Japanese yen denominated loans contracted with the JICA in August 2004 for the financing of the environmental recovery program for the Baixada Santista metropolitan region, called the Clean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa). Under this loan, payments of interest are made in semi-annual installments and principal will be paid in the end of the contract with final maturities in August 2029. The principal amount accrues interest at rates that vary from 1.8% to 2.5% per year; (ii) ¥6,208 billion in Japanese yen denominated loans contracted with the JICA in October 2010 for the financing of the environmental improvement program in the basin of the Billings dam, part of the New Life Program (Programa Vida Nova). The loan matures in October, 2035. Amortizations will be made in semi-annual installments after a grace period of seven years, starting on October 20, 2017. The principal amount accrues interest at a rate of 1.2% per year related to civil work and 0.01% per year related to consulting; and (iii) ¥19,169 billion in Japanese yen denominated loans contracted with the JICA in February 2011 to complement the financing for the first stage of the Clean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa), with commercial conditions similar to the ¥21,316.0 million loan entered into in August 2004. These funds will be used for the provision of works and services in the Baixada Santista metropolitan region. The credit agreement expires in 18 years and interest varies from 1.8% to 2.5% per year.


In February 2012, we contracted a ¥33,584 million Japanese yen denominated loanloans contracted with the JICA, composed of the following:  (i) ¥21,320.0 million denominated loans contracted in August 2004 for the financing of the environmental recovery program for the Baixada Santista metropolitan region, called theClean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa).  Under this loan, amortizations are made in semi‑annual installments and principal will be paid at the end of the contract with final maturities in August 2029.  The principal amount accrues interest at rates that vary from 1.8% to 2.5% per year; (ii) ¥6,208 million in denominated loans contracted in October 2010 for the financing of the environmental improvement program in the basin of the Billings dam, part of the New Life Program (Programa Vida Nova).  The loan matures in October 2035.  Amortizations will be made in semi‑annual installments after a grace period of seven years, starting on October 2017.  The principal amount accrues interest at a rate varying from 0.01% to 1.2%; (iii) ¥19,169.0 million denominated loans contracted in February 2011 to complement the financing for the first stage of the Clean Wave Program (Programa Onda Limpa), with commercial conditions similar to the loan entered into in August 2004.  These funds will be used for the provision of works and services in the Baixada Santista metropolitan region.  The credit agreement expires in 18 years and interest varies from 1.8% to 2.5% per year; and (iv) ¥33,584 million denominated loan in February 2012 for the financing of the Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction.Reduction (Programa corporativo para Redução de Perdas).  The loan matures on February 2037.  Amortizations will be in semi-annualsemi‑annual installments starting on September 2019.  The principal amount accrues interest at a rate varying from 0.01% to 1.7%.  The first disbursement of 1.7% per year related¥6 billion connected to civil work and 0.01% per year related to consulting. As of the date of this annual report, no disbursement had been made under this agreement. Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction was in March 2013.

88


Our borrowings from multilateral institutions, such as the IADB, IBRD and IBRD,JICA, have in the past been, and in the future are likely to be, guaranteed by the State or the federal government.  We do not pay fees for these guarantees.  Under some of the loan agreements with the IADB, IBRD and JICA; we have granted a guarantee (contra garantia) to the federal government.  For further information on the terms of these loan agreements, see “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditure Program—Main Projects of Our Capital Expenditure Program—Metropolitan System Investment Program—Tietê Project”;

For further information on the terms and guarantees of the financing agreements with the JICA, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Transactions – Government Guarantees of Financing” and “Item 4.A. History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditure Program—Main Projects of Our Capital Expenditure Program—Metropolitan System Investment Program—Clean Wave Program”. Financing.”

Our outstanding domestic debt was R$5,542.95,853.6 million as of December 31, 20112012 and consisted primarily ofreal-denominated‑denominated loans from federal and state-ownedstate‑owned banks, in particular, Banco do Brasil S.A., Caixa Econômica Federal and the BNDES, as well as debentures issued in November 2009, MarchJune 2010, September 2010, JanuaryFebruary 2011, February 2011,2012 and November 2012, the first debentures issuance of our investee (Aquapolo) in August 2011 and financial leasing.

The following summarizes our principal borrowings from federal and State-ownedState‑owned banks:

§in March 1994, we entered into a loan agreement with Banco do Brasil S.A., or Banco do Brasil, in the amount of R$2.3 billion.  Amortizations of the principal amount are made in 240 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2014.  The principal amount accrues interest at the daily government interest rate plus 8.50% per annum and monetary adjustment;

·in March 1994, we entered into a loan agreement with Banco do Brasil S.A., or Banco do Brasil, in the amount of R$2.3 billion.  Amortizations of the principal amount are made in 240 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2014.  The principal amount accrues interest at the daily government interest rate plus 8.50% per annum and monetary adjustment;

·from 1996 to 2012, we have entered into several line of credit agreements with Caixa Econômica Federal, pursuant to which amortizations of principal are paid in 60, 120, 180 or 240 months in monthly installments commencing 30 days following the applicable grace period, which varies from 14 to 48 months from the date of signature of the line of credit agreement.  The final maturity is 2036.  The principal amount accrues interest from 5.0% to 9.5%.  The lines of credit are collateralized (i) by collections of daily billings of water supply and sewage services up to the total amount of the debt, or (ii) by a monthly plan of billings corresponding to the minimum of three times the monthly charge, depending on the terms of the relevant line of credit agreement;

·in August 2002, we entered into a line of credit agreement with BNDES.  The final maturity date is February 2013.  The principal amount accrues interest at the long‑term rate fixed by the TJLP but limited to 6.0% per year, plus 3.0% per year.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0%, such excess will be added to the principal amount payable at maturity.  The line of credit agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services.  On February 15, 2013 we made our last interest and amortization payment;

·in November 2007, we entered into a R$129.9 million credit agreement with BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 96 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2019.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0% per year, plus 2.50% per year.  If theTJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The credit agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;

89

§from 1996 to 2009, we have entered into several line of credit agreements with Caixa Econômica Federal, pursuant to which amortizations of principal are paid in 180 or 240 months in monthly installments commencing 30 days following the applicable grace period, which varies from 14 to 48 months from the date of signature of the line of credit agreement.  The final maturity is 2032.  The principal amount accrues interest from 5.0% to 9.5%.  The lines of credit are collateralized by (i) collections of daily billings of water supply and sewage services up to the total amount of the debt, or (ii) by a monthly plan of billings corresponding to the minimum of three times the monthly charge, depending on the terms of the relevant line of credit agreement;
§in August 2002, we entered into a line of credit agreement with the BNDES.  The final maturity date is February 2013.  The principal amount accrues interest at the long-term rate fixed by the TJLP but limited to 6.0%, plus 3.0% per annum.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0%, suchexcess will be added to the principal amount payable at maturity.  The line of credit agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;



 

§in November 2007, we entered into a R$129.9 million credit agreement with the BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 96 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2019.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0%, plus 2.50% per annum.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0%, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The credit agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;
§in May 2008, we entered into a R$174.0 million financing agreement with the BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 150 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2023.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0%, plus 2.15% per annum.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per annum, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The financing agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;
§in March 2010, we entered into a R$294.3 million financing agreement with the BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 156 successive monthly installments commencing 30 days after the 24-month grace period, with final maturity in 2025.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0%, plus 1.92% per annum.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0%, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The financing agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services; and
§in 2011, we entered into financial leases in the total amount of  R$49.6 million with certain contractors for the construction of infrastructure on land we own. During the construction phase, we recognize an intangible assets and the related liability of the lease at fair value. Upon the conclusion of the construction, which is estimated to June 2013, we start to pay the rental of the infrastructure (in 192 installments) and the lease is updated accordingly to the contract. On December 31, 2011, there were no constructions completed. These contracts are recognized as financial leasing.

·in November 2007, we entered into a R$174.5 million credit agreement with BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 150 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2023.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but is limited to 6.0% per year, plus 2.15% per year.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount;

·in May 2008, we entered into a R$174.0 million financing agreement with BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 150 successive monthly installments, with final maturity in 2023.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0% per year, plus 2.15% per year.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The financing agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;

·in March 2010, we entered into a R$294.3 million financing agreement with BNDES.  Amortizations of the principal amount will be made in 156 successive monthly installments commencing 30 days after the 24‑month grace period, with final maturity in 2025.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP, but limited to 6.0% per year, plus 1.92% per year.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The financing agreement is collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services;

·in March 2012, we entered into a R$180.8 million credit agreement with BNDES.  The amortization of the principal shall be paid in up to 156 successive monthly installments beginning 30 days after the grace period of 36 months, with the final maturity in 2027.  The principal amount accrues interest at the TJLP but it is limited to 6.0% per year plus a yearly 1.72%.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  This credit agreement is guaranteed partly by the earnings of water and sewage services; and

·in 2011, we entered into financial leases in the total amount of R$49.6 million with certain contractors for the construction of infrastructure on land we own.  During the construction phase, we recognize an intangible assets and the related liability of the lease at fair value.  Upon the conclusion of the construction, which is estimated to 2013 and 2014, we start to pay the rental of the infrastructure (in 240 installments) and the lease is updated accordingly to the contract.  On December 31, 2012, there were no constructions completed.  These contracts are recognized as financial leasing.

Under the BNDES program, in the amount of R$826.1 million, we issued the firsttwo out of three tranches of debentures.  In November 2009, we issued our tenth debentures in the aggregate principal amount of R$275.4 million.  The debentures are divided in three series:  the first and secondthird series will mature in November 2020 and the thirdsecond in December 2020.  The debentures of the first and third series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$77.1 million and R$115.7 million, respectively, bear interest at 1.92% per year, plus the TJLP.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0%, per year, such excess will be capitalizedadded to the 15th day of each month that such debentures are outstanding.principal amount.  The debentures of the second series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$82.6 million, bear interest at the rate of the IPCA index plus 9.53% per year.  Our tenthThis issuance was entirely subscribed by the BNDES.  We used the funds raised from it for investments primarily in the Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction and on improvements and reforms of the Rio Grande’s water treatment plant, including other projects for water supply and sewage collection systems in the São Paulo Northern Coast, Paraíba Valley and Mantiqueira Regions.  In February 2011, we issued our fourteenth debentures, the second tranche out of those three, also subscribed exclusively by BNDES.  These debentures are divided in three series:  the first and third series will mature in February 2022 and the second, in March 2022.  The debentures of the first and third series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$77.1 million and R$115.7 million, respectively, bear interest at 1.92% per year, plus the TJLP.  If the TJLP exceeds 6.0% per year, such excess will be added to the principal amount.  The debentures of the second series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$82.6 million, bear interest at the rate of the IPCA index plus 9.20% per year.  We have been used the funds raised from this tenthfourteenth issuance for investments primarily in the Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction and on improvements and reforms of the Rio Grande’s water treatment plant, including other projects for water supply and sewage collection systems in the São Paulo Northern Coast, Paraíba Valley and Mantiqueira Regions.

In April 2010, we issued in two series our eleventh issuance of debentures in the aggregate principal amount of R$1,215.0 million.  The first and second series will mature in March 2015 and 2013, respectively.  The debentures of the first series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$810.0 million, bear interest at the CDI plus 1.95% per year, and the second series, in the aggregate principal amount of R$405.0 million, bear interest at the CDI plus 1.4% per year.  The net proceeds from our eleventh issuance of debentures were partially used to redeem the promissory notes issued in December 2009.  The remaining portion was used for general corporate purposes.

In90


Additionally, in June 2010, we issued 500,000 debentures to the Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço), or FGTS, based on the FGTS’s program to finance companies in the sanitation, transport and real estate businesses (our twelfth issuance).  The proceeds will be released in three tranches within a six-month period each, totaling R$500.0 million in the aggregate, of which R$335 million was already released to us.  The debentures will bear interest based on the TR plus 9.5% per year.  The debenturesyear and will mature in June 2025.  The debentures havebear a grace period of four years in respect of payments, and we have an option tomay redeem the debentures as fromstarting in July 2014.  We intend to useused the proceeds from the twelfth issuance to fund a portion of our capital expenditure program in the water supply and sewage systems.


In January 2011, we issued in a single series our thirteenth debentures in the aggregate principal amount of R$600.0 million.  The debentures will mature in August 2012 and bear interest, paid semi-annually, at the CDI rate plus 0.65% / 0.75% / 0.85% / 1.25% per year.  The proceeds were used to redeem the promissory notes issued in August 2010.

On February 15, 2011, we issued 100 debentures subscribed exclusively by the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES). These debentures were distributed in three nonconvertible series, at a nominal value of R$ 2,753.70, totaling R$ 275.4 million. This transaction was settled on April 15, 2011, for all series. The funds raised in this issuance will be used in expenditures in water supply and sewage systems in the following projects: Water Treatment Stations at Rio Grande, Litoral Norte, Vale do Paraíba and Mantiqueira, Bacia do Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiai; and for program of reduction of losses. The debentures will mature in March 2022 and bear interest, paid monthly, quarterly and semi-annually, depending on the period, at the TJLP rate plus 1.92% per year or 9.19% per year.system.

In August 2011, the joint-controlledjoint‑controlled entity “Aquapolo” issued 326,732 debentures, registered as its first issuance of simple debentures, nonconvertible, in a uniquesingle series amounting to R$326.7 million.  The debentures will mature in August 2029 and bear interest, paid monthly, at the TR plus 8.75% per year.

All of ourreal-denominated indebtedness is indexed to take into account the effects of inflation.  Most of ourreal-denominated debt provides for inflation-based increases in their respective principal amounts; the increases are determined by reference to the TR plus an agreed margin.

In March 2011, our securitization fund (Fundo de Investimentos Creditórios) created in 2006 in the amount of R$250 million expired.  In addition, on June 1, 2011 the second series of our eighth issuance of debentures was paid in the amount of R$465.0 million.

In December 2010, we issued US$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.250% senior unsecured notes due 2020.  Interest on the notes will accrue from December 16, 2010 at a rate of 6.250% per year and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June 16 and December 16, commencing on June 16, 2011.  The notes will mature on December 16, 2020.  The proceeds from the offering will befirst issuance were used to repay financial commitments throughout 2011.build the Aquapolo plant and infrastructure designed to treat industrial water from this petrochemical industrial center in Mauá municipality.

In February 2012, we issued our fifteenth issuance of debentures in two series in the aggregate principal amount of R$771.0.  The first and second series will mature in February 2017 and 2019, respectively.  The debentures of the first series (in the aggregate principal amount of R$287.3 million) bear interest at a rate of CDI plus 0.99% per year.  The second series (in the aggregate principal amount R$483.7 million) bears interest at a rate of IPCA plus 6.2% per year.  The net proceeds from out fifteenth issuance of debentures were used to repay financial commitments throughout 2012.2012, including the early redemption of our thirteenth debentures issuance.

In November 2012, we carried out our sixteenth debentures issuance of R$500 million, with a maturity date of December 2015 and bearing interest, each quarter with an interest rate of between 0.30% and 0.7% per year plus the CDI rate.  These proceeds of this issuance were used to pay the Company’s financial commitments for 2012 and 2013.

In January 2013, we carried out our seventeenth debentures issuance of R$1.0 billion in three series, the first for R$424.7 million with maturity date of January 2018 and with an interest rate of 0.75% per year plus the CDI rate, the second for R$395.2 million with a maturity of January 2020 and with the interest rate of 4.50% per year plus IPCA variation and the third for R$180.1 million with a maturity date of January 2023 and with an interest rate of 4.75% per year plus IPCA variation.  The proceeds of these issuances were used to pay our financial commitments for 2013

In March 2013 we made the first and second series amortization payments and the early redemption of the remaining balance of the 1st series of the eleventh debenture issuance.  This issuance was due to mature on March 2015.

All of ourreal‑denominated indebtedness is indexed to take into account the effects of inflation.  Most of ourreal‑denominated debt provides for inflation‑based increases in principal amounts; the increases are determined by reference to the TR plus an agreed margin.

Financial Covenants

We are subject to financial covenants under the agreements evidencing or governing our outstanding indebtedness.

Foreign currency denominated indebtedness

With respect to our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars, or in baskets of foreign currencies, we are subject to financial covenants, including but not limited to those set forth in the loan agreements entered into with the IADB.  Each of these agreements contains, among other provisions, limitations on our ability to incur debt.  The financial covenants related to loan agreements 713, 896 and 1212 consider - Tariffs must:  (a) produce revenues sufficient to cover the system’s operating expenses, including administrative, operating, maintenance, and depreciation expenses; (b) provide a return on the balance sheet value of property, plant, and equipment not less than 7%; and (c) during project execution, the balances of short‑term loans must not exceed 8.5% of total equity.  These agreements have a cross default clause with IADB.  The financial covenants related to AB Loan agreements (1983AB) consider the Company’s ratio of debt service coverage, determined on a consolidated basis, which must be higher than or equal to 2.35:1.00; and the total adjusted debt over EBITDA, determined on a consolidated basis, which must be lowerthan or equal to 3.65:1.00.  This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

91


The indentureindentures relating to our US$140.0 million 7.5% notes due 2016 is the most stringent of these debt agreements. The indenture prohibits,and US$ 350.0 million 6.25% notes due 2020 prohibit, subject to some exceptions, the incurrence of additional debt in the event that:  (i) the ratio of Adjusted Total Debt to Adjustedadjusted EBITDA (as defined in the related indenture)indentures) is greater than 3.65x;3.65:1.00:  or (ii) the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (as defined in the indenture)related indentures) is less than 2.35x.2.35:1.00.  The agreement has a cross default clause.This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We do not believe that these covenants will impose constraints on our ability to finance our capital expenditure program or, more generally, to develop our business and enhance our financial performance.

Local currency denominated indebtedness

With respect toAll of our outstanding indebtedness denominated inreais, we have entered into several credit agreements with the BNDES that requirescontracts require us to maintain the following ratios:

Our credit agreements with the BNDES dated August 2002 and November 2007 require us to maintain: (i) anadjusted EBITDA/Adjusted net operational income ratiooperating revenues equal to or higher than 38%;, (ii) an asset/short-term liability (excluding the short-term portion of long-term liabilities) ratio higher than 1.0x; (iii) total connections (water and sewage)/employees ratioadjusted EBITDA/adjusted financial expenses equal to or higher than 520; (iv) EBITDA/debt service equal to or higher than 1.5x; and (v) a shareholders’ equity/total debt ratio equal to or higher than 0.8x.


Our credit agreement with the BNDES dated May 2008 requires us to maintain: (i) an EBITDA/net operational income ratio equal to or higher than 38%; (ii) an EBITDA/financial costs ratio equal to or higher than 2.35x;2.35:1.00; and (iii) aadjusted net bank debt/adjusted EBITDA equal to or higherlower than 3.2x.3.65:1.00.

Our credit agreement with the BNDES dated March 2010 requires us to maintain: (i) an EBITDA/net operational income ratio equal to or higher than 38%; (ii) an EBITDA/financial costs ratio equal to or higher than 2.35x; and (iii) net bank debt/EBITDA equal to or higher than 3.65%.

In addition, our BNDES financings have the following financial covenants: (i) EBITDA/net operational income ratio equal to or higher than 38%; and (ii) shareholders’ equity/total debt ratio equal to or higher than 0.8x.

Pursuant to the terms of our credit agreements with the BNDES, the financial ratios mentioned above must be calculated based on our year end audited financial statements.

Although we have been presenting our financial information in our annual reports on Form 20-F in compliance with IFRS since fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our Brazilian financial information was presented under Brazilian GAAP for fiscal years through December 31, 2009.  Accordingly, compliance with the financial ratios mentioned above was calculated under Brazilian GAAP.  Brazilian Corporate Law was recently amended to facilitate the convergence of Brazilian GAAP with IFRS, and thereafter the Accounting Pronouncement Committee (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis) issued several new accounting standards that progressively adapted Brazilian GAAP to IFRS (the new Brazilian GAAP).  Beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all Brazilian publicly held companies, such as us, must report under the new Brazilian GAAP.  Due to the impact of this change, we requested a temporary waiver from BNDES suspending compliance with these financial covenants in order to allow us to analyze the impact of the new Brazilian GAAP on our ability to comply with the financial ratios.  BNDES granted the waiver on December 26, 2011, suspending compliance for 13 months beginning with December 2011.

In addition, all of our financing agreements with the Caixa Econômica Federal and most of our financing agreements with the BNDES are subject to a Performance Improvement Agreement (Acordo(Acordo de Melhoria de Desempenho)Desempenho).  The Performance Improvement Agreement, dated May 28, 2007, as amended in August 2012, was entered into between us and the Federalfederal government, and the Caixa Econômica Federal and the BNDES as intervening parties.  Pursuant to this agreement, we mustwere required to comply with at least four of eight financial and operating ratios during the nextsubsequent five years.  If we fail to comply with any of thesethe ratios required by the Caixa Econômica Federal and the BNDES, either may suspend our credit lines and we will be prevented from entering into any other financing agreements with those entities.  We have the ability, however, to renegotiate the ratios during the five-year period if needed.

Our financing agreement with the federal government and Banco do Brasil S.A. and our credit agreements with Caixa Econômica Federal do not contain material financial covenants.  The agreement with Caixa Econômica Federal has a cross default clause. This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

With respect to our outstanding debentures, the eighth, ninth, eleventh and twelfth issuances require us to maintain aan adjusted current debt ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities, excluding from current liabilities the current portion of long-term indebtedness)noncurrent debts incurred by the Company that are recorded in current liabilities) higher than 1.0x1.0:1.0 and an EBITDA/financial expendituresexpenses ratio equal to or higher than 1.5x.1.5:1.0.  These issuances have a cross default clause.This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The tenth and fourteenth issuance requires us to maintain (i) an EBITDA/net operational revenue ratio equal to or higher than 38 percent;38%; (ii) an EBITDA/financial expendituresexpenses ratio equal to or higher than 2.35x;2.35:1.0; and (iii) a net bank debt/EBITDA ratio equal to or higher than 3.65x.

The thirteenth issuance requires us to maintain (i) an EBITDA/financial expenditures ratio equal to or higher than 1.5% and (ii) a net debt/EBITDA ratio equal to or higher than 3.65%.3.65:1.0.  These issuances have a cross default clause. This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The fifteenth and sixteenth issuance requires us to maintain (i) an EBITDA/paid financial expenses ratio equal to or higher than 1.5:1.0 and (ii) an adjusted total debt/EBITDA ratio equal to or lower than 3.65:1.0.  These issuances have a cross default clause. This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The first issuance of debentures of our jointly-owned subsidiary Aquapolo requires its (i) debt service coverage ratio (cash generation/debt service) not to exceed 1.2:1.0; (ii) adjusted current liquidity ratio higher than 1.0:1.0; and (iii) limits its ability to incur futher indebtedness in an amount greater than R$20 million.  This issuance has a cross default clause. This agreement has a cross default clause. See Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The agreement signed between our jointly-owned subsidiary SESAMM – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S.A. and Caixa Econômica Federal requires its (i) subscribed and paid-in capital stock to, correspond to, at least, twenty per cent (20%) of the total amount of investments in funds from this financing; (ii) a debt service coverage ratio (ICSD) of, at least, 1.3:1.0 during the amortization phase; and (iii) indebtedness limit of up to onetwelfth (1/12) of annual gross revenue or up to the amount corresponding to three (3) monthly installments, under the agreement, whichever is higher.

92


The table below shows the more restrictive covenants ratios and our actual financial covenants ratios as of December 31, 2012.

Restrictive Ratios

Ratio as of December 31, 2012

Adjusted EBITDA/Adjusted net operating revenues

Equal to or higher than 38%

43%

Adjusted EBITDA/Adjusted financial expenses

Equal to or higher than 2.35:1.00

6.10:1.00

Adjusted net debt/Adjusted EBITDA

Equal to or lower than 3.65:1.00

2.01:1.00

Adjusted current ratio

Higher than 1.0:1.0

1.32:1.00

EBITDA/Paid financial expenses

Equal to or higher than 1.5:1.0

6.12:1.00

As of the date of this annual reportDecember 31, 2012 and 2011, we were in compliance withhad met all the financial ratios that are currently applicable to us.requirements set forth by its loan and financing agreements.

Capital Requirements

We have, and expect to continue to have, substantial liquidity and capital resource requirements.  These requirements include debt-servicedebt‑service obligations, capital expenditures to maintain, improve and expand our water and sewage systems, and dividend payments and other distributions to our shareholders, including the State.

Capital Expenditures


Historically, we have funded and plan to continue funding our capital expenditures with funds generated by operations and with long-termlong‑term financing from international and national multilateral agencies and development banks.  We generally include in our capital expenditure program for the following year the amount of investment that was not realized in the previous year.  In 2011,2012, we recorded R$2.4billion2.5 billion in the water and sewage treatment infrastructure under our capital expenditure program.  We have budgeted investments in the amount of approximately R$7.99.9 billion from 20122013 through 2015. 2016.

Dividend Distributions

We are required by our bylaws to make dividend distributions, which can be made as payments of interest on shareholders’ equity to our shareholders in an amount equal to or higher than 25% of the amounts available for distribution.  We made aggregate distributionsdeclared dividends of R$394.2534.3 million, R$456.0578.7 million and R$578.7 million456.0 in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, respectively.

On June 25, 2010, we paid R$198.1 million as dividends to the State. See “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Transactions – Dividends.”

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, in particular, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk.  We are exposed to foreign currency risk because a substantial portion of our financial indebtedness is denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, while we generate all of our net operating revenues in reais.  Similarly we are subject to interest rate risk based upon changes in interest rates, which affect our net financial expenses.  For further information on our market risks, see Note 3.1 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 included elsewhere in this annual report.

Exchange Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, R$1,745.6 million, R$2,248.9 million and R$3,053.4 million, or 26.6%, 27.2% and 35.5%, respectively, of our debt obligations were denominated in foreign currencies (including debt pegged to baskets of foreign currencies).  The basket of foreign currency-pegged debt consists primarily of our debt with the IADB.  As a result, we are exposed to exchange rate risks that may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to meet debt service obligations.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We estimate that the potential loss to us in connection with U.S. dollar-denominated debt that would have resulted as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 from each hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 1% change in the U.S. dollar against thereal  would have been approximately R$17.5 million, R$22.5 million and R$30.5 million, respectively.  Consistent with these estimates, a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 10% change in this exchange rate would have resulted in losses of approximately R$174.6 million, R$224.9 million and R$305.3 million as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.  These estimates do not take into account that the changes in exchange rates comprising the baskets of foreign currencies often present variations different from the devaluation of thereal in relation to the U.S. dollar.

The fluctuation of thereal in relation to the U.S. dollar and with the IADB and IBRD basket of currencies, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2009

2010

2011

 

(in percentages)

Depreciation (appreciation) of therealin relation to the U.S. dollar

(25.5)

(4.3)

12.6

 

 

 

 

IADB basket of currencies

0.032

4.3

1.01

We have not utilized derivative financial instruments.

As of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, we had no short-term indebtedness outstanding, other than the current portion of long-term debt.

Interest Rate Risk


As of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, R$2,193.1 million, or 33.4%, R$2,529.4 million, or 30.6%, and R$2,537.1 million or 29.5%, respectively, of our total debt outstanding balance denominated in reais was based on variable rates of interest based on the UPR, which is equivalent to the TR.  In addition, as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, R$1,132.4 million, or 17.3%, R$2,064.7 million, or 25.0%, and R$1,882.3 million or 21.9%, respectively, of our total debt denominated inreais  was subject to interest rates based on the CDI.  As of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, R$659.4 million, R$579.2 million and R$747.3 million, respectively, of our foreign-currency denominated debt was based on the IADB and the IBRD variable rates of interest, which are determined based on the cost of funding of these multilateral organizations in each period.

As of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, we did not have any derivative contracts outstanding which limited exposure to changes in the UPR or the CDI or in the IADB or IBRD variable rates.  However, we are obliged by law to invest our excess cash with financial institutions controlled by the Brazilian government.  We invest these excess funds, which totaled R$671.1 million, R$1,852.6 million and R$2,027.0 million as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, mainly in short-term instruments.  As a result, our exposure to Brazilian interest rate risk is partially limited by ourreal-denominated floating interest time deposits investments, which generally earn interest based on the CDI.  In addition to our exposure with respect to existing indebtedness, we may become exposed to interest rate volatility with respect to indebtedness incurred in the future.

We estimate that we would have suffered a loss over periods of one year, respectively, of up to R$65.6 million, R$82.6 million and R$86.0 million if a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rates applicable to financial liabilities as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, had occurred.  Consistent with these estimates, a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 100 basis points change in these interest rates would have resulted in losses of approximately R$655.8 million, R$826.5 million and R$859.6 million as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.  This sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis point movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial liabilities and sustained over a period of one year or nine months, as applicable, and that such movement may or may not affect interest rates applicable to any other homogenous category of financial liabilities.

A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (i.e., U.S. dollars).  As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the effect of interest rate fluctuation on these financial instruments, as consistently unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

The tables below provide information about our interest rate-sensitive instruments.  For variable interest rate debt, the rate presented is the weighted average rate calculated as of December 31, 2011.  For the foreign currency denominated obligations, these amounts have been converted at the selling rates as of December 31, 2011 and do not represent amounts which may actually be payable with respect to such obligations on the dates indicated.

 

As of December 31, 2011

Expected maturity date

 

2012

2013

2014

 

After 2015

Total

Average annual interest rate

 

(in millions, except percentages)

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents denominated inreais   

2,031.1

-

-

-

2,031.1

 

Total assets

2,031.1

-

-

-

2,031.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by TR or UPR

474.0

505.3

207.0

1,350.8

2,537.1

9.9%

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by TJLP

82.8

69.7

86.2

647.4

886.1

2.3% 

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by IPCA

7.3

11.7

11.7

157.0

187.7

16.5% 

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by CDI

876.6

470.8

270.0

264.9

1,882.3

12.4% 

Fixed rate, denominated in reais

-

-

-

49.6

49.6

 

Floating rate, denominated in U.S. dollars

118.4

111.3

111.3

804.0

1,145.0

2.8% 

Fixed rate, denominated in Yen

59.8

53.2

53.2

799.2

965.4

2.4% 

Fixed rate, denominated in U.S. dollars

11.1

5.2

5.2

921.6

943.1

3.4% 

Total long-term debt

1,630.0

1,227.2

744.6

4,994.5

8,596.3

7.4


The percentage of our indebtedness subject to fixed and floating interest rate is as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

2009

2010

2011

Floating rate debt:

 

Denominated in U.S. dollars

16.1%

11.7%

13.3%

Denominated inreais 

73.4%

72.8%

63.9%

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate debt:

 

 

 

Denominated inreais 

-

-

0.6%

Denominated in Yen

6.2%

5.3%

11.2%

Denominated in U.S. dollars

4.3%

10.2%

11.0%

Total

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

C.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.

Our policy is to invest continually in the modernization of equipment and in the technology needed to identify, evaluate and improve our provision of basic sanitation services while promoting environmental protection and maintaining our competitiveness and profitability.  Our research and development activity is divided into committees according to strategy and complexity.  In 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, we invested R$3.86.3 million, R$3.83.2 million and R$3.23.8 million, respectively, in research and development.

In order to further develop our expansion plans, we created a new division for research, technology development and innovation in May 2010.  Among other initiatives, the new division is responsible for:  monitoring technological trends, defining our research projects portfolio, obtaining funding from development agencies, developing an intellectual property protection policy and establishing cooperation agreements for the development of researches that are of our interest.  The new division will also enable us to increase the quality of our procedural processes and technology portfolio.

93


With respect to our partnership with the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), or the FAPESP, to develop and support research projects involving researchers from graduate schools, the State of São Paulo and our employees,employees.  This partnership provides R$50 million in 2010 weincentives, to be paid equally by each of the two institutions.  Under this partnership, 12 projects have been approved 12 projectsand nine of them are currently underway.  They are related to:  (i) the development of technology related to the use of filtering membranes in water and sewage treatment, (ii) alternatives for the treatment, mud disposal and use in water and sewage treatment stations, (iii) new technologies for the implementation, operation and maintenance of water distribution and sewage collection systems, (iv) new technologies for improvements in unitary operations processes, (v) water quality monitoring, (vi) energetics efficiency and (vii) sanitary economy.

We also started a partnership with Fraunhofer Institute in Germany, in order to obtain biomethane from the sewage treatment process to be used as fuel for cars.  In the second semester of 2013, it will start to fill up a fleet of 49 cars, instead of gasoline, as a 3-year test.  This project will contribute to reduce pollutant emission into the atmosphere.  We are investing R$900 thousand in this system while our German partner is investing R$5.1 million.

Seeking energy efficiency in our operations, we projected an equipment to calculate the correct oxygen dosage to be used in air difusors, which are used in the sewage treatment process.  The project aims also to find the best cleaning period and when these devices have to be replaced.

Additionally, we have developed custom made biofilters to reduce the odor from sewage pumping stations and sewage treatment plants.

Intellectual Property

Trademarks

We have secured registration of our logo and composite trademark at the Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property (Instituto(Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial)Industrial), or the INPI. We have registered with the INPI the following trademarks:  “Sabesp,” “Sabesp Soluções Ambientais,” “Projeto Tietê,” “Programa Córrego Limpo,” “Programa Onda Limpa,” “Prol – Programa de Reciclagem do Óleo De Fritura,” “Revista DAE,” “Ligação Sabesp,” “Agente da Gente – Sabesp na Comunidade”, “PURA – Programa de Uso Racional da Água”, “Sabesp Inteligência Ambiental” “Clubinho Sabesp,” “Cauã,” “Denis,” “Gabi,” “Gotucho,” “Gota Borralheira,” “Dr. Gastão,” “Iara,” “Ratantan,” “Sayuri” Andand “SuperH20.” Cauã, Denis, Gabi, Gotucho, Gota Borralheira, Dr. Gastão, Iara, Sayuri and Ratantan are some of the characters of our children’s club (Clubinho SABESP)(Clubinho SABESP), which is a tool for environmental education directed to children through our website).website.

We have also filed applications with the INPI for registration of the following trademarks:  “Parque Da Integração,” “Programa de Recuperação Ambiental,” “Signos” (Sistema(Sistema De Informação Geográfica No Saneamento)Saneamento), “Scorpion,” “Semana do Meio Ambiente Sabesp,” “Pura-Programa de Uso Racional da Água,” “Agente da Gente – Sabesp na Comunidade,” “Sabesp Inteligência Ambiental,” “Aqualog – Tecnologia Sabesp,” “Eficaz,” “Água Dede Reúso Sabesp,” “Água Sabesp Aquífero Guarani,” “Água Sabesp Estação Cantareira,” “Contrato de Fidelização Sabesp,” “Esgotos não Domésticos Sabesp,” “Cine Sabesp”, “Ecoposto Sabesp”, “PEA – Programa de Educação Ambiental”, “Sabesp Abraço Verde” and the following character of the Clubinho SABESP:  “Cadu.”


Patents

We have a patent granted by the INPI for a constructive device in a building hydraulic simulator used for didactic purposes.  We have also filed patent requests for the following additional devices:

§·        a water consumption measurement unit;

§·        a biofilter odor control unit;

§·        a device for the removal of supernatants in the treatment of sewage; and

§·        a mobile device for the calibration of hydrometers.

·rotary devices used to clean water reservoirs transported by trucks with high-pressure hydrojetting systems.

94


We are currently awaiting responses to our patent requests from the INPI.  While the requests are under consideration, we are granted the exclusive right to use these devices.

Software

We have adopted an internal policy that provides for an active and effective audit and prevention of unauthorized software.  We have acquired the software licenses for all our workstations.

We have also developed certain computer programs for management and control of water and sewage treatment facilities, as well as for third‑party services management, called “AQUALOG (Control Water Treatment Plants),” “SGL (Bid Management System), “SCORPION (software(Software to OperacionalOperational Control),, “Electronic Price Quotation” (Cotação Eletrônica de Preços), “PREGÃO SABESP ONLINE”,ONLINE,” “SISDOC –Sistema de Controle de Documentos”Documentos, “Sistema” “Sistema de análise do comportamento metrológico de hidrômetros”metros, “Modelo” “Modelo padronizado de Laudo técnico-MPLT,cnico‑MPLT,” and "SGH" -“SGH” ‑ hydrometry management system (Sistema de Gestão de Hidrometria). and online software for managing specific articles published in the DAE magazine.  We have also secured registration of these programs at the INPI.

AQUALOG is a Brazilian software designed to monitor water treatment through the employment of artificial intelligence.  In 2001, we completed the first rendering of services based on the AQUALOG software to a third party with the automatizationautomation of a water treatment plant in the city of Jaguará do Sul, State of Santa Catarina.  We have entered into an agreement to license the software to Sanesul, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul and to Teuto’s drugs factory, in the city of Anapólis, state of Goiás.  We currently have a temporary license for the AQUALOG software and are awaiting its final registration with the INPI.

SGL is an electronic price quotation system that allows us to view and control all bid and acquisition proceedings in real time.

Domain Names

We own the domain names described below which have been registered with the relevant entity in Brazil, Regristro.br:

§·        www.sabesp.com.br; 

§·        www.corregolimpo.com.br; 

§·        www.projetotiete.com.br; 

§·        www.revistadae.com.br; 

§·        blogdasabesp.com.br; 

§·        blogsabesp.com.br; 

§·        sustentabilidadesabesp.com.br; 

§·        clubinhosabesp.com.br; and

§·        superh2o.com.br. 

D.Trend Information

Several factors may affect our future results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, including:

§·        the interests of our controlling shareholder;


§·        regulations issued by the ARSESP regarding several aspects of our business, including with respect to our ability to adjust our tariffs;tariffs and the competency of state and municipalities to manage their sanitation affairs;

§95


·        Brazilian economic conditions;

§·        meteorological conditions;

§·        the effects of any continued international financial turmoil that may affect liquidity in the Brazilian capital and lending markets;

§·        the effects that further changes in the Basic Sanitation Law and its interpretation may have on the basic sanitation industry in Brazil and on us;

§·        the effects of inflation in our results of operations;

§·        the effects of fluctuations in the value of the Brazilianreal and in interest rates on our net interest income;

§·        the effects from the increase in tariff that occurred on September, 11, 2011;2012, the tariff revision in April 2013 and future tariff changes;

§·        the renewal of our concession agreements; and

§·        the formalization of agreements with certain of the municipalities we serve.

Each of these factors is described in more detail under “5.A. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

In addition, you should read “3.D. Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks we face in our business operations, which could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

E.Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off‑balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2011.2012.

F.Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

Our debt obligations and other contractual obligations as of December 31, 20112012 were as follows:

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than 5 years

Total

(in millions ofreais)  

Less than 1 year

1‑3 years

3‑5 years

More than 5 years

Total

 

 

 

(in millions ofreais

Loans and financing

1,630.0

1,971.8

1,307.1

3,687.4

8,596.3

1,367.4

2,033.9

1,311.0

4,357.0

9,069.3

Estimated interest payments(1)

485.8

875.3

543.9

1,475.5

3,380.5

Operating and capital lease obligations(2)

64.1

178.9

169.6

2,599.5

3,012.1

Estimated interest payments(1)

431.1

931.0

651.4

1,801.7

3,815.2

Operating and capital lease obligations(2)

21.6

166.3

153.6

2,521.7

2,863.2

Alto Tietê PPP

85.9

94.7

182.8

862.2

1,225.6

62.4

58.5

141.3

635.7

897.9

Pension plan contributions(3)

77.3

169.7

195.5

1,312.5

1,755.0

PAES program(4)

36.7

18.4

-

55.1

Purchase obligations

346.5

249.9

81.4

-

677.8

Pension plan contributions(3)

229.4

477.9

507.2

1,881.0

3,095.5

PAES program(4)

19.0

-

19.0

Purchase obligations(5)

2,356.8

1,591.5

51.9

1.0

4,001.2

Total

2,726.3

3,558.7

2,480.3

9,937.1

18,702.4

4,487.7

5,259.1

2,816.4

11,198.1

23,761.3

___________

______________

(1)   Estimated interest payments on loans and financing were determined considering the interest rates as of December 31, 2011.2012.  However, our loans and financing are subject to variable interest indexation and foreign exchange fluctuations, and these estimated interest payments may differ significantly from payments actually made.The debt agreements have cross default clauses.

(2)   Includes capital lease obligations which are collateralized by part of the billings from the provision of water and sewage services.

(3)   Consists of pension plan contributions estimated for the following year.years.

(4)   The PAES program, as set forth by Law No. 10,684, dated May 30, 2003.

(5)   The purchase obligations are the contractual obligations of investments and expenses and consider the estimated inflation adjustments for each year.

96


We believe that we can meet the maturity schedule through a combination of funds generated by operations, the net proceeds of new issuances of debt securities in the Brazilian and international capital markets and additional borrowings from domestic and foreign lenders.  Our borrowings are not affected by seasonality.  For information concerning the interest rates on our indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2011,2012, see Note 1213 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31 2012, 2011, 2010 included elsewhere in this annual report.


ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A.Directors and Senior Management

Under our bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law, we are managed by our board of directors (Conselho de Administração), which currently consists of tennine directors, and a board of executive officers (Diretoria), which currently consists of six executive officers.

As our controlling shareholder, the State has the ability to control the election of our board of directors and, therefore, our direction and future operations.  Upon the election of a new State governor and any resulting change in the administration of the State, all or some of the members of our board of directors, including our chairman, have historically been replaced by designees of the new administration.  Our board of directors may in turn replace some or all of the executive officers.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Control by the State of São Paulo—We are controlled by the State of São Paulo, whose interests may differ from ours or from minority shareholders’ interests, and which could have a material adverse effect on us.”

Board of Directors

Our bylaws provide for a minimum of five and a maximum of 15 directors.  The members of our board of directors are elected at a general shareholders’ meeting to serve renewable two‑year terms.  Pursuant to our bylaws, our employees have the option to elect one member of our board of directors.  Currently, our employees have not elected a director.  In addition, pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, at least one member of the board of directors of mixed capital companies, such as us, must be appointed by the minority shareholders.  Finally, according to theNovo Mercado rules, at least 20.0% of the board of directors must be comprised of independent members.

TheSeven of the current members of our board of directors, Edson de Oliveira Giriboni, Dilma Seli Pena, Walter Tesch, Alberto Goldman, Jerônimo Antunes, Reinaldo Guerreiro and Alexander Bialer were elected inat the general shareholders’ meeting held on April 23, 2012.  The directors Claudia Polto da Cunha and Francisco Vidal Luna were elected at the general shareholders’ meeting held on April 22, 2013. The tenure of all the directors will end upon the election of the new members at the general shareholders’ meeting to be held in April 2014.  Currently, we have threefour directors considered independent under theNovo Mercado rules.

Our board of directors ordinarily meets once a month or when called by a majority of the directors or the chairman.  Its responsibilities include the establishment of policy and general orientation of our business, and the appointment and supervision of our executive officers.

The following are the names, ages, positions, dates of election and brief biographical descriptions of the current members of our board of directors: 

Director

Age

Position

Date Elected

Edson de Oliveira Giriboni

5960

Chairman

April 23, 2012

Sidney Estanislau BeraldoClaudia Polto da Cunha

6145

Director

April 23, 201222, 2013

Dilma Seli Pena

6263

Director

April 23, 2012

Walter Tesch

6869

Director

April 23, 2012

Alberto Goldman

7475

Director

April 23, 2012

Heraldo Gilberto de Oliveira

47

Independent Director*

April 23, 2012

Jerônimo Antunes

5657

Independent Director*

April 23, 2012

Reinaldo Guerreiro

5960

Independent Director*

April 23, 2012

Andrea Sandro CalabiFrancisco Vidal Luna

66

DirectorIndependent Director*

April 23, 201222, 2013

Alexander Bialer

6566

Independent Director*

April 23, 2012

____________________________________

*      These directors comply with the independence requirements established by theNovo Mercado rules.

97


 

Edson Giriboni.  Mr. Giriboni has been the chairman of our board of directors since April 2011. Mr. Giriboni holds a degree in civil engineering from theEscola Politécnica of theUniversidade de São Paulo, a degree in business administration from theAssociação Educacional de Itapetininga, and post-graduatepost‑graduate degrees from theUniversidade de Campinas and theUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisMr. Giriboni has been theSecretary of Sanitation and Water Resources of the State of São Paulo since January 2011.  He is also a State Deputy in São Paulo.  Mr. Giriboni was the general manager of Fepasa and the vice-mayorvice‑mayor of the city of Itapetininga where he also worked at the Municipal Department of Works and Public Utilities, and subsequently, in the Municipal Department of Industry and Development.

Sidney de Oliveira BeraldoClaudia Polto da Cunha..  Mr. Beraldo Ms. Cunha has been a member of our board of directors since April 2011.  Mr. Beraldo2013. She holdsa law degree and a master’s degree in biological sciences and a degree in business administration and a post-graduate degree in business administration.  HePublic Law fromFaculdade de Direito atUniversidade de São Paulo, USP. She has been a state attorney for the Chiefstate of StaffSão Paulo since 2001, acting as the Corporate Matters Officer for Companhia Paulista de Parcerias, and Executive Secretary atState Council for Protection of Capitals of the State (Conselho de Defesa dos Capitais do Estado), since 2006. Ms. Cunha is member of the board of directors at Empresa Metropolitana de Transportes Urbanos, and member of the Fiscal Committee at Companhia de Desenvolvimento Habitacional e Urbano. She was member of the board of directors at Companhia do Metropolitano de São Paulo, State Government Office since January 2011.  Mr. Beraldo started his career in politicsmember of Fiscal Committee at Rede Ferroviária Federal, as city councilman in 1977 and was the mayorwell as member of the city Sãboard of trustees at Fundação Joãde Proteção da Boa Vista between 1983 and 1988.  In 1994, Mr. Beraldo was elected State Deputy, position he held until March 2011 after several re-elections.  He was the president of the Legislative Assembly from 2003 to 2005, president of the State Council of the political party PSDB from 2005 to 2006, head of the Public Management Department until April 2010 and the general coordinator of Governor Geraldo Alckmin’s campaign.e Defesa do Consumidor.


Dilma Seli Pena.  Ms. Pena has been a member of our board of directors since January 2007 and our Chief Executive Officer since January 2011.  She holds a master’s degree in public administration from FGV and a degree in geography from theUniversidade de Brasília.  In 1976, she began her career as a public servant working for the Research Institute of Applied Economics (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada), or IPEA.  She was director of the sanitation division of the Urban Policy Secretariat of the Ministry of Planning Office (Secretaria de Política de Saneamento Urbano), director of the strategic investments division of the Ministry of Planning (Investimentos Estratégicos do Ministério de Planejamento) and director of the Brazilian National Water Agency (Agência Nacional de Águas).  She was a deputy secretary of the Economics and Planning Secretariat of the São Paulo state government (Secretaria de Economia e Planejamento do Estado de São Paulo) and an effective member of the Environmental Board of the Industry Federation of the State of São Paulo (Conselho Ambiental da Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo).  From 2007 to 2011, she was responsible for the State Secretariat of Sanitation and Water Resources (formerly known as the State Secretariat of Sanitation and Energy) and has been the chairperson of the board of directors of EMAE and CESP, companies owned by the State of São Paulo.  She has authored a number of articles, texts and books in the areas of sanitation, water resources and planning.

Walter Tesch.  Mr. Tesch has been a member of our board of directors since April 2011.  He holds a degree in sociology from the University of Uruguay and a master’s degree in social sciences from the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru.  Mr. Tesch has worked in Peru, Venezuela and several Latin American countries.  Between 2005 and 2008, Mr. Tesch was the head of the administrative district of Parelheiros, a water source region in the city of São Paulo, and until 2010 he was the deputy Executive Secretary of the “Water Defense” (“Defesa das Águas”) operation, an agreement between the São Paulo Municipal and State governments.  Mr. Tesch is also the author of books on cooperativism and water sources in the city of São Paulo.

Alberto Goldman.  Mr. Goldman has been a member of our board of directors since April 2011.  Mr. Goldman holds a degree in civil engineering from theEscola Politécnica of theUniversidade de São Paulo.  Mr. Goldman was vice-governorvice‑governor of São Paulo from January 2007 to March 2010 and governor of São Paulo from April 2010 to December 2010.  He was a member of our board of directors from April 2009 to March 2010.  He was also the State Secretary of Development (currently, Development, Science and Technology State Department) from January 2007 to February 2009, State Deputy for two terms and Federal Deputy for six terms.  Mr. Goldman was the president of the Budget Mixed Committee in 2000 andrapporteurof the General Telecommunications Law.  He was the Special Secretary of State of the Program Coordination in 1987 and of the Administration Coordination between 1988 and 1990.  Mr. Goldman was the Minister of Transportation from 1992 to 1994.

98


 

Heraldo Gilberto de Oliveira.  Mr. Oliveira has been a member of our board of directors since November 2009.  He holds a degree in accounting and a degree in business administration.  He also holds a master’s degree in controllership and accounting from theFaculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidadeof the Universidade de São Paulo, or FEA-USP.  Mr. de Oliveira is a professor of Capital Markets and Investor Relations in the post-graduation and MBA courses at theFundação Instituto de Pesquisas Contábeis, Atuariais e Financeiras, or FIPECAFI.  Mr. Oliveira is a partner atFCO Consultores Associados and works as an accounting and financial expert consultant.  He worked for ten years as an independent accountant.  Mr. Oliveira was a member of the board of directors and the coordinator of the audit committeeofBanco Nossa Caixa S.A.from 2007 to August 2009 and since September 2009 has been the coordinator of the audit committee of Banco Industrial e Comercial S.A. – BICBANCO.  He has been a director of theInstituto de Executivos em Finanças of São Paulo since September 2009.

Jerônimo Antunes.  Mr. Antunes has been a member of our board of directors since April 2008.  He holds a master’s and Ph.D. degree in controllership and accounting from theUniversidade de São Pauloand holds a degree in business administration and accounting.  He has been a certified independent accountant and consultant in accountability and corporate finance since 1977.  He has been a professor at FEA-USPFEA‑USP since 1999, a professor of several MBA courses, at FIPECAFI since 2000, at FEA-USP,FEA‑USP, since 2000, and atFIA – Fundação Instituto de Administração since 2006.  He was a professor at theUniversidade Federal do Ceará from 2000 to 2005 and in several other institutions.  He was a director of FIPECAFI, from 2000 to2007.  He was a board member and director of IBRACON from 1998 to 2006 and a director ofAssociação Nacional dos Executivos de Finanças, Administração e Contabilidade, or ANEFAC, from 1994 to 2000.


Reinaldo Guerreiro.  Mr. Guerreiro has been a member of our board of directors since January 2007.  He holds a Ph.D. in accounting and controllership, a master’s degree in accounting and controllership and a bachelor’s degree in accounting sciences, all of them from FEA-USP.FEA‑USP.  Currently, he is both professor and Director at FEA-USP.FEA‑USP. He has also authored the books “A meta da empresa, seu alcance sem mistérios,” “Gestão do lucro,” “Estruturação de sistemas de custos para gestão de rentabilidade,” and co-autoredco‑authoredControladoria uma abordagem de gestão econômica” and “Contabilidade gerencial.” He is a researcher at CNPQ and has published various scientific articles In domestic and international magazines.  He is a specialized consultant in financial management.  He has worked on various projects in the areas of financial management, costs, budget and IT in a variety of companies.  Other than for us, Mr. Guerreiro does not serve on the board of directors of any other public companies.

Andrea Sandro CalabiFrancisco Vidal Luna.. Mr. CalabiLuna has been a member of our board of directors since April 2011.  Mr. Calabi holds2013.He has a degreedoctorate in economics from FEA-USP, a master’s degree in economicsEconomics from theInstitutoFaculdade de Economia Administração e PesquisaContabilidade ofat theUniversidade de São PauloPaulo. (IPE-USP), a master’sIn the public sector, he has served as the Secretary of arts and Ph.D. in economics fromPlanning for the Universitycity of California, Berkeley.  Mr. CalabiSão Paulo. He has beenalso worked at the Treasury Department for the State Secretary of the São Paulo and the Federal Planning Bureau, among other roles. Within the private sector, Mr. Luna was Chairman and President of Banco Inter American Express S.A. At the governmental level, he served as a member of the advisory board of the Superintendency for the Development of the Northeast (Superentendência de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste – Sudene), a member of the board of directors of BNDES; superintendent of the Planning Institute of the Federal Planning Bureau,Special Secretary for Economic Affairs of the Federal Planning Bureau. At the state level, Mr. Luna has also been the Chairman of the Advisory  Board for the division of Economic Affairs of the Secretariat of Finance of the State Treasury since January 2011.He was theof São Paulo State Secretary of Economics and Planning from January 2003 to February 2005.  Mr. Calabi was the presidentexecutive secretary of the BNDES, FINAME (the Special AgencyBoard of Industrial Financing), BNDESPAR (the holding companyFinancial Coordination of BNDES) from July 1999 to February 2000 and also of Banco do Brasil, from January to July to 1999.  He was Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Planning and president of the Institute of Applied Economics Research of Ministry of Planning, or IPEA, from 1995 to 1996, Secretary of the National Treasury of the Ministry of Finance from 1986 to 1988, General Secretary of the Department of Planning of Presidency and Chief Executive Officer of the IPEA from 1985 to 1986.São Paulo. Currently, Mr. Calabi was a member and chairman of several boards of directors and currentlyLuna is a member of the board of directors and the audit committee of CESP, Higher Economics CouncilDesenvolve SP, President of FIESP, Institutethe board of Cancer, Centro Cultural, FFM –directors of IDBRASIL and the Afro‑Brazilian Museum, a member of the board of trustees of Fundação Padre Anchieta and an advisory board member of the Faculty of Medicine Foundation – USP, Albert Einstein Hospital and of the IBGC – Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance.FFM

Alexander Bialer.  Mr. Bialer has been a member of our board of directors since April 2003.  He holds a degree in mechanical engineering fromInstituto Tecnológico da Aeronáutica—ITA and a specialization degree in systems administration from the FGV.  He is a member of the board of directors of ROMI, AVIANCATACA and Andritz Hydro IneparInepar. Until recently he was on the board of Pacific Rubiales and pacific Rubiales energy.ROMI.  In addition, Mr. Bialer was Director of Business Development of GE in Brazil and Latin America, from which he retired in 2002.  He also collaborated with AVON, Máquinas Piratininga and ASEA.

Board of Executive Officers

Our board of executive officers is composed of six executive officers appointed by our board of directors for renewable two year terms.  Our executive officers are responsible for all matters concerning our day-to-dayday‑to‑day management and operations.  Members of our board of executive officers have individual responsibilities established by our board of directors and our bylaws.

The following are the names, ages, positions, dates of election and brief biographical descriptions of our board of executive officers:

Executive Officer

Age

Position

Date Elected

Dilma Seli Pena

6263

Chief Executive Officer

June 2, 2011

Manuelito Pereira Magalhães Junior

4445

Corporate Management Officer

June 2, 2011

Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso

5455

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer

June 2, 2011

Paulo Massato Yoshimoto

5960

Metropolitan Region Officer

June 2, 2011

Luiz Paulo de Almeida Neto

5556

Regional Systems Officer

June 2, 2011

João Baptista ComparaniPaulo Tavares Papa

5556

Technology, Enterprises and Environment Officer

September 15, 2011March 21, 2013


 

Environment Officer99


 

Dilma Seli Pena.  See above “—Board of Directors.”

Manuelito Pereira Magalhães Júnior.  Mr. Magalhães has been our Corporate Management Officer since January 2011.  Mr. Magalhães was a member of our board of directors from January 2007 to February 2011.  He holds a degree in economic sciences and a master’s degree in economic sciences from theInstituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. He was a member of the board of directors of the Companhia de Engenharia de Tráfego de São Paulo, of the COHAB and, of the Empresa de Tecnologia de Informação e Comunicação de São Paulo. He was a parliamentary advisor in the Federal Senate.  From 1998 to 2002, he was the special advisor of the Minister of Health.  From 2005 to 2006 he was the ombudsman of the National Supplementary Health Agency, or ANS.  From 2005 to 2006, he was the deputy secretary of the Planning Secretariat and the secretary of Planning of the Municipality of São Paulo.  He was also the technical advisor, the secretary of finance and the director of the Department of Advisory, Planning and Management in the municipality of Campinas, State of São Paulo.

Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso. Mr. Affonso has been our Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer since July 2003.  Mr. Affonso holds a Ph.D. and a master’s degree in economics from theUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, or UNICAMP, and a degree in economics from theUniversidade de São Paulo.  He has been a professor at UNICAMP since 1986, a professor at FEA-USPFEA‑USP from 1983 to 1989, and a director of public economy atFundação do Desenvolvimento Administrativo from 1994 to 2003.  He also represented Brazil on the board of the Forum of Federations (a non‑governmental entity based in Canada) from 2000 to 2006.  Mr. Affonso has also held several positions at the State government.

Paulo Massato Yoshimoto.  Mr. Yoshimoto has been our metropolitan officer since February 2004.  He holds a degree in civil engineering from theEscola de Engenharia de Lins.  Mr. Yoshimoto joined us in 1983, and has held the positions of executive assistant to the operations office and head of the water production and maintenance and metropolitan planning departments.  Mr. Yoshimoto has also held the position of senior planning professional atEmpresa Metropolitana de Planejamento, from 1975 to 1983.

Luiz Paulo de Almeida Neto. Mr. Almeida Neto has been our regional systems officer since January 2011.  He holds a degree in civil engineering from theEscola Politécnica of theUniversidade de São Paulo, a business administration degree fromFundação Educacional Votuporanga/SP and a post-graduatepost‑graduate degree in sanitary engineering fromFaculdade de Saúde Pública of theUniversidade de São Paulo.  Mr. Almeida joined us in 1979 and has worked with us as head of the Baixo Tietê Business Unit responsible for the management of areas located in the hydrographic basins of Baixo Tietê, Tietê-Batalha,‑Batalha, São José dos Dourados and Turvo Grande. Mr. Almeida Neto has authored several articles.

João Baptista Comparini.Paulo Tavares PapaMr. CompariniPapa has been our Technology, Enterprises and EnvironmentEnvironmental Officer since September 2011March 2013.  He holds a degree in civil engineering with especialization in public health engineering,graduated as an electric engineer from the University of Santa Cecília de Santos – SP. Between 2005 and holds a masters and a doctorate degree all from theEscola Politécnica2012 he was Mayor of theUniversidade de São Paulo.  He holds an MBA in management fromFundação Getúlio Vargas.  He joined us in 1980 and holding different positions.Santos for two successive terms.  From 2002 until September 2011,1991 to 1995 he was the regional head of Sabesp, the business unitBaixada Santista region and on the coast ofPardo e Grade, responsible São Paulo.  Between 1997 and 2000 he was the Municipality Secretary of Environment and CEO of the Traffic Engineering Company of Santos.  He began his career in the public sector in 1984 as an engineer for the management of servicesSantos Municipality where he worked in the municipalities of Sapucaí-Mirim/Grande, Mogi-Guaçu, Pardopublic services, transport and Baixo Pardo/Grande.  Mr. Comparini is author of several articles and co-author of the bookBiossólidos na Agriculturatraffic sectors.

B.    Compensation

Compensation 

Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, our shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate amount of compensation we pay to the members of our board of directors, members of our fiscal committee and our executive officers.  According to Instruction No. 480 issued by CVM, we have to periodically disclose certain information on the aggregate compensation such as averages and fringe benefits.

100


For the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the aggregate compensation, including benefits in kind granted that we paid to members of our board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal committee for services in all capacities was R$3.94.1 million.

The tables below sets forth the break downbreakdown of the total compensation received by our directors and members of our board of executive officers and fiscal committee and other data related to their compensation for the periods indicated:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

Total compensation per administrative body

(in thousands of R$, except where indicated otherwise)

Board of directors

1,004

1,240

1,215

Board of executive officers

2,878

2,442

2,231

Fiscal committee

226

217

229

Total amount of compensation 

4,108

3,899

3,675

 

 

 

 

Number of members (in individuals)

 

 

 

Board of directors

10

10

10

Board of executive officers

6

6

6

Fiscal committee

4

5

6

 

 

 

 

Fixed annual compensation

 

 

 

Salary

 

 

 

Board of directors

804

853

903

Board of executive officers

1,553

1,265

1,304

Fiscal committee

179

217

229

Direct and indirect benefits

 

 

 

Board of directors

200

Board of executive officers

653

495

394

Fiscal committee

47

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation

 

 

 

Bonus

 

 

 

Board of directors

-

387

312

Board of executive officers

672

681

533

Fiscal committee

-

 

 

 

 

Maximum amount of compensation

 

 

 

Board of directors

148

169

148

Board of executive officers

516

444

477

Fiscal committee

56

46

38

 

 

 

 

Minimum amount of compensation

 

 

 

Board of directors

50

81

100

Board of executive officers

335

276

324

Fiscal committee

56

46

38

 

 

 

 

Average amount of compensation

 

 

 

Board of directors

100

128

113

Board of executive officers

480

407

372

Fiscal committee

56

46

38


101


 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2009

2010

2011

 

 

 

 

Total compensation per administrative body (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

1,225

1,215

1,240

Board of executive officers

2,200

2,231

2,442

Fiscal committee

231

229

217

Total amount of compensation (in thousands of R$)

3,656

3,675

3,899

 

 

 

 

Number of members:

 

 

 

Board of directors

13

10

10

Board of executive officers

6

6

6

Fiscal committee

5

6

5

 

 

 

 

Fixed annual compensation

 

 

 

Salary (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

918

903

853

Board of executive officers

1,283

1,304

1,265

Fiscal committee

231

229

217

Direct and indirect benefits (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

-

-

-

Board of executive officers

406

394

495

Fiscal committee

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation

 

 

 

Bonus (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

307

312

387

Board of executive officers

511

533

681

Fiscal committee

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

Maximum amount of compensation (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

108

148

169

Board of executive officers

396

477

444

Fiscal committee

38

38

46

 

 

 

 

Minimum amount of compensation (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

41

100

81

Board of executive officers

303

324

276

Fiscal committee

38

38

46

 

 

 

 

Average amount compensation (in thousands of R$):

 

 

 

Board of directors

94

113

128

Board of executive officers

367

372

407

Fiscal committee

46

38

46

Profit Sharing and Pension Plans

We have established a pension and benefit fund (Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social), or SABESPREV, to provide our employees with retirement and pension benefits.  This pension plan provides benefit payments to former employees and their families.  Both we and our employees make contributions to the pension plan.  We are also required to pay supplemental pension payments relating to the employment contract of certain employees prior to the creation of SABESPREV.  Our total contributions to the pension plan totaled R$12.97.4 million, R$8.9 million and R$13.8 million in 2012, 2011 and R$8.9 million in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.  Based on independent actuarial reports, as of December 31, 2011,2012, our obligation under these plans totaled R$1,638.22,124.3 million.  For further information on our pension plans see Note 1617 to our consolidated financial statements.statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 included elsewhere in this annual report.

Beginning in 2008, payments under the profit-sharingprofit‑sharing plan were based both on general goals that evaluate us as a whole and on other goals that evaluate the performance our different business units.  Payments are proportionally reduced annually if the goals are not completely achieved.

We recorded profit-sharingprofit‑sharing expenses of R$53.460.5 million, R$56.6 million and R$52.6 million in 2012, 2011, and R$56.6 million in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.  We do not have a stock-optionstock‑option plan for our employees.

C.Board Practices


The members of our board of directors are elected at a general shareholders’ meeting to serve renewable two-yeartwo‑year terms.  Our board of directors ordinarily meets once a month or when called by a majority of the directors or the chairman.  See “Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management—Board of Directors.”

Our board of executive officers is composed of six executive officers appointed by our board of directors for renewable two-yeartwo‑year terms.  Meetings of our board of executive officers are held weekly in the case of ordinary meetings or when called by the chief executive officer in the case of special or extraordinary meetings.  See “Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management—Board of Executive Officers.”

None of our directors and/or executive officers is a party to an employment contract providing for benefits upon termination of employment.  Those directors and officers who are also our employees will remain as our employees after their tenure as directors and/or officers, in this case, maintaining all benefits granted to our employees.

Fiscal Committee (Conselho Fiscal)  (Conselho Fiscal)

Our fiscal committee, which is established on a permanent basis, consists of a minimum of three and a maximum of five members and generally meets once a month consists of four members and four alternates.  Furthermore, each member has its respective alternate.  The current members of our fiscal committee were elected in the shareholders’ meeting held on April 23, 2012.22, 2013.  Their tenure will end in 2013, depending on when they were elected.2014.  The primary responsibility of the fiscal committee, which is independent from management and from the external auditors appointed by our board of directors, is to review our consolidated financial statements and report on them to our shareholders.

The following are the names, ages, position, date of election and brief biographical descriptions of the current and alternate members of our fiscal committee:

Fiscal Committee Members

Age

Position

Date Elected

José Antonio Xavier

5152

Member

April 23, 201222, 2013

Humberto Macedo Puccinelli

5455

Member

April 23, 201222, 2013

Horácio José Ferragino

6162

Member

April 23, 201222, 2013

Alexandre Luiz Oliveira de ToledoMassao Fábio Oya

5231

Member

April 23, 201222, 2013

Tomás Bruginski de Paula

5051

Alternate

April 23, 2012

Antônio Cláudio Zeituni

41

Alternate

April 23, 201222, 2013

José Rubens Gozzo Pereira

65

Alternate

April 22, 2013

Joaldir Reynaldo Machado

64

Alternate

April 23, 201222, 2013

Joaldir Reynaldo MachadoJorge Michel Lepeltier

6365

Alternate

April 23, 201222, 2013

 

102


José Antonio Xavier. Mr. Xavier has been a member of our fiscal committee since April 2011.  He holds a degree in economy and a post-graduatepost‑graduate degree in governmental controllership from thePontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)(PUC‑SP).  Mr. Xavier was an auditor of the State Treasury from 1993 to 1998 and the Technical Director of the State Treasury since 1998.  He was a member of the Fiscal Committee at BANESCARD, CESP and CDHU.

Humberto Macedo Puccinelli.  Mr. Puccinelli has been a member of our fiscal committee since April 2011. Mr. Puccinelli holds a degree in economics from thePontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)(PUC‑SP). He worked at the Department of Planning from 1985 to 1995, at the Health State Department as secretary assistant from 1995 to1996,to 1996, at the State Treasury from 1996 to 2002, and at the Planning Department as secretary assistant in 2003.  Since January 2004 he has been the Technical Assistant of the State Treasury.

Horácio José Ferragino.  Mr. Ferragino was elected to our fiscal committee on April 23, 2012.  He holds a degree in accounting from theFaculdades Integradas Santo AntônioFISA-SPFISA‑SP.  He worked in the public sector for the State Fund for School Buildings (FECE – Fundo Estadual de Construções Escolares) from 1970 to 1976, for the School Building Company from 1976 to 1988 (CONESP – Cia de Construções Escolares), for the Educational Development Foundation (FDE – Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Educação from 1988 to 1995) andCasa Civil e Secretaria de Gestão Pública(1995 – 2012), where he coordinated projects involving public purchase policies.  He currently works as Project Coordinator for the Department of Planning and Regional Development.

Alexandre Luiz de Oliveira ToledoMassao Fábio Oya.. Mr. ToledoOya has been a member of our fiscal committee since April 2010.2013. He holdshas a degree in lawaccounting and an MBA with a specialization in Financial Management from theUniversidade de São Paulo. University of Anchieta. Mr. Toledo has worked with financial institutions for 20 years, especially in capital markets transactions, defending minority shareholders.Oya is a consultant and advises companies on accounting as well as corporate governance. He has worked inalso serves on the legal departments of Bradesco de Investimentos and Schahin Cury S.A.  Mr. Toledo is and has been a member of various fiscal committees of several companies, as a sitting member: including COPEL, Wetzel S.A., Banrisul, Sanepar, and board of directors including CELG, COPEL, CSTas an alternate member: TIM Participações S.A., EZ TEC Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., Companhia Providência Indústria e Comércio S.A. and Plascar.Eucatex S.A.

91


Tomás Bruginski de Paula.  Mr. de Paula has been an alternate member of our fiscal committee since April 2006.  He holds a degree and a master’s degree in economics from UNICAMP.  He has been a Professor at the Economics Department ofPontifícia Universidade Católica – PUC since 1986.  He has been an executive officer at Companhia Paulista de Parcerias since 2004 and Companhia Paulista de Securitização since 2009.  Mr. de Paula has worked as a consultant for several entities, including the Economic Committee for Latin America (CEPAL), the United Nations Development Program (PNUD), the Brazilian Institute of Municipal Administration (IBAM), the Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration of FGV (EBAPE/FGV), the State System Data Analysis Foundation (SEADE), and the Brazilian Electricity Agency in the infrastructure and public policy financing areas.  He is also a member of the fiscal committee of the Nossa Caixa Desenvolvimento and a member of the Board of DirectosDirectors of DERSA.  Mr. de Paula was also a member of the fiscal committee of the São Paulo Company of Electric Power Transmission.

Antônio Cláudio Zeituni.  Mr. Zeituni has been an alternate member of our fiscal committee since April 2011.  He holds a degree in law from thePontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.  Mr. Zeituni has worked with banking, civil and administrative law.  He has also worked in several law firms, including Oliveira de Toledo & Advogados Associados where he is currently a partner.

José Rubens Gozzo Pereira.  Mr. Pereira has been an alternate member of our fiscal committee since April 2010.  He holds a degree in economics fromUniversidade Mackenzie, a graduate degree from FGV and attended international studies extension programs at the Universities of London and Paris.  He has been responsible for the Funding department of the Finance Secretariat since 1989.  Mr. Pereira held positions in the public sector in the DAEE, where he was responsible for the Budget and Financing area; he was an executive officer atCompanhia de Engenharia de Tráfego – CET, and in the International Cooperation department ofCompanhia Energetica de Silo Paulo – CESP.  Mr. Pereira has been the coordinator for the Funding Department of the SiloSão Paulo State Government in the Finance Secretariat since 1991.

Joaldir Reinaldo Machado.  Mr. Machado has been an alternate member of our fiscal committee since April 2010.  He holds a degree in economics fromUniversidade de São Paulo.  Mr. Machado has been an employee of SEADE since 1979.  He has also held several other management positions, including management advisor toEmpresa Metropolitana de Planejamento – EMPLASA, financial executive of the Finance Department of our Company, chief of staff of the Environment Secretariat and chief of staff and head of department of the SEADE Foundation.  Mr. Machado is currently the chief of staff of the Economy and Planning Secretariat of the São Paulo State Government.

103


Jorge Michel Lepeltier. Mr. Lepeltier has been a member of our fiscal committee since April 2013. He has a graduate degree in Capital Markets, Finances and Strategic Planning from New York University. He also has a bachelor’s degree in economics and accounting fromPontifíca Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Mr. Lepeltier has experience with appliance companies, and worked at the Whirlpool Group from May 1978 until August 1993, initially as Treasurer. After two years as serving as CFO and Director of Investor Relations of the Brasmotor Group, Mr. Lepeltier went on to work at Price Waterhouse for twelve years. Currently, Mr. Lepeltier is a partner at Jorge Lepeltier Consultores Associados, which offers consulting services in administration, finance, corporate structure and auditing. He serves on various boards of directors, fiscal committees and auditor committees, and, over the last five years, he has served on the board of directors of the following companies:  AES Tietê S.A., Companhia Paranaense de Energia – Copel and Triunfo Participações e Investimentos S.A., among others. As a fiscal committee member, he has served on the committees of the following companies:  TIM Participações S.A., Cia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – Sabesp and Drogasil S.A., among others.  As an audit committee member, he has served on the audit committees of the following companies:  Triunfo Participações e Investimentos S.A. and Positivo Informática S.A., among others. Currently, he is a fiscal committee member of Alpargatas S.A., Companhia Providência Indústria e Comércio and M&G Poliester S.A., and an audit committee member of Anhanguera Educacional Participações S.A., among others.

Audit Committee

Our bylaws provide for an audit committee to be comprised of three board members, who will cumulatively comply with the requirements of (i) independence, (ii) technical expertise, and (iii) identifying and complying with applicable exemptions in accordance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, rules.  The members are appointed by the board of directors.

The audit committee is responsible for assisting and advising the board of directors in its responsibilities to ensure the quality, transparency and integrity of our published financial information.  To this end, the audit committee supervises all matters relating to accounting, internal controls and the internal and independent audit functions.  The audit committee and its members have no decision making powers or executive functions.

The minimum availability required from each member of the audit committee is thirty hours per month.  Under our bylaws, the members shall exercise their roles for the same period as their corresponding term of office, or until otherwise resolved by the general shareholders’ meeting or by resolution of the board of directors.

The following are the names, positions and dates of election of the members of our audit committee:

Director

Position

Date Elected

Jerônimo Antunes

Coordinator and Financial Expert

April 26, 2012

Reinaldo Guerreiro

Member

April 26, 2012

Heraldo Gilberto de OliveiraFrancisco Vidal Luna

Member

April 26, 201225, 2013

 

Regulatory Affairs Committee

Our bylaws provide for a regulatory issues committee to be comprised by theof our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, Metropolitan Officer, and Regional System Officer.  The regulatory affairs committee is responsible for defining our regulatory directives, strategies and guidelines and coordinating our regulatory affairs department, subject to the guidelines defined by our board of directors.

The Chief Executive Officer acts as chairman of our regulatory affairs committee and is responsible for proposing its internal regulations to be approved by the committee.  Pursuant to our bylaws, the head of regulation shall be the executive secretary of the committee.

Under our bylaws, the resolutions of our regulatory affairs committee shall be binding and our executive boardsboard shall be entitled to implement them in the scope of its jurisdiction.  Meetings of our regulatory affairs committee are held at least once a month, if ordinary, and when extraordinary can be called by any of our committee’s members.

104


Corporate Governance Practices

The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and NYSE standards can be found on our website, www.sabesp.com.br, at the following location:  Investors Relations – Corporate Governance – SABESP and NYSE Standards.  The information found at this website is not incorporated by reference into this document.

D.    Employees


Employees 

As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had 14,896 full-time15,019 full‑time employees.  In 2011,2012, we had an average of 918888 trainees and 506560 apprentices (aprendizes), as defined by federal Law No. 10,097, dated December 19, 2000.

The following table sets forth the number of our full-timefull‑time employees by main category of activity and geographic location as of the dates indicated:

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2009

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

Number of employees by category of activity:

 

 

 

Projects and operations

9,763

10,092

9,782

9,919

9,782

10,092

Administration

2,574

2,527

2,501

2,474

2,501

2,527

Finance

490

477

454

454

477

Marketing

2,276

2,234

2,159

2172

2,159

2,234

Number of employees by corporate division:

 

 

 

Head office

1,541

1,496

1,475

1513

1,475

1,496

São Paulo metropolitan region

7,055

7,135

6,861

6,865

6,861

7,135

Regional Systems

6,507

6,699

6,560

6641

6,560

6,699

Total number of employees

15,103

15,330

14,896

15,019

14,896

15,330

 

The average tenure of our employees is approximately 17 years.  We also outsource certain services such as maintenance, delivery of water and sewage bills, meter reading, catering and security.  We believe that our relations with our employees are generally satisfactory.

Approximately 70% of all our employees are members of unions. The five main unions that represent our employees are i) the Sindicato dos Trabalhadores em Água, Esgoto e Meio Ambiente de São Paulo - SINTAEMA, Sindicato dos Trabalhadores da Região Urbana deii) workers union of Santos São Vicente, Santos, Região Metropolitana de Santos, Litoral Sul eUrban Industries, Baixada Santista region, Vale do Ribeira, South Coast and Vale Ribeira - SINTIUS, iii) the Sindicato dos Engenheiros do Estado de São Paulo - SEESP, iv) the Sindicato dos Advogados de São Paulo - SASP and v) the Sindicato dos Técnicos Industriais de Nível Médio(2ºGrau)dio no Estado de São Paulo - SINTEC. As a result of the 2010 collective bargaining discussions, wages were temporarily increased by 5.05%.  The unions filed a claim with the Labor Court seeking to, among other requests, increase wages by 1.5%, increase the salary base over which the annual profit distribution is calculated, increase payment of overtime inby 100% and increase additional payment of working night hours from 20% to 50%.  The Labor Court decided in favor of the unions and we appealed from the decision.  We are still waiting forThe appeal resulted in a partial suspension of the decision; the decision on our appeal. Any unfavorable decisionto increase overtime by the Labor Court will result in100%, however, was upheld.

In 2011, we entered into an increase in expenses with personnel. Our most recentadditional collective bargaining agreement, entered into in 2011:which:  (i) increased wages by 6.39% (which corresponds to the adjustment for inflation for the period) plus a real gain of 1.51%, (ii) established an employment guarantee for 98% of our employees, (iii) increased the number of days permitted under maternity leave from 120 to 180 days and (iv) increased meal vouchers by 10.07%, among other provisions.  Our most recent collective bargaining agreement, entered into in 2012, resulted in the following:  (i) an increase in salaries by 6.17% (which corresponds to the inflation adjustment for the period plus further addition 1.93%), (ii) the establishment of a guarantee of continued employment for 98% of our employees, (iii) an increase in meal vouchers of 10% and a further increase of 8% in all other benefits, (iv) stopped extra payments to employees who drive company vehicles.

We have experienced the following strikes in the last seven years, none of which interrupted the essential services that we provide:  a two-day strike in June 2005, a one-dayone‑day strike in May 2006, a four-dayfour‑day strike in June 2008, a three-daythree‑day strike in May 2009, an eight-dayeight‑day strike in May 2010, and a one dayone-day strike in 2011.  In 2007 and 2012 there were no strikes.  Under Brazilian law, our non-administrativenon‑administrative employees are considered “essential employees” and, therefore, are limited in their right to strike.

105


E.Share Ownership

As of April 23, 2012,May 08, 2013, the members of the board of directors and the executive officers owned an aggregate of 2,612common1,518 common shares.  The members of our board of directors and our executive officers, on an individual basis and as a group, beneficially own less than 0.1% of our common shares.  See “Item 7.A. Major Shareholder” for more information.  As of the same date, none of our directors and executive officers owned any stock option plans.

ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A.Major Shareholder


Our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2011,2012, consisted of 227,836,623 common shares, without par value.  On April 22, 2013 our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares. Since then, our outstanding capital stock consists of 683,509,869 common shares, without par value. Under our bylaws and the State laws, the State is required to own at least one-halfone‑half plus one of our outstanding common shares.  All of our shareholders, including the State, have the same voting rights.

The following table sets forth ownership information for each of our shareholders that beneficially owned 5.0% or more of our common shares and for our officers and directors, individually and as a group, as of April 23, 2012.May 08, 2013.

Common shares

Common shares

Shares

%

Shares

%

State of São Paulo

114,508,086

50.3%

343,524,258

50.3%

Directors and executive officers of SABESP

2,612

Less than 0.1%

1,518

Less than 0.1%

Others

113,325,925

49.7%

339,958,611

49.7%

Total(1)

227,836,623

100.0% 

683,509,869

100.0%

_____________

______________

(1)   As of April 23, 2012, 24.8%May 08, 2013, 26.3% of our outstanding common shares were held by 2,9776,239 registered shareholders in Brazil.

As of April 20, 2012, 24.9%May 08, 2013, 23.4% of our outstanding common shares were held in the United States, in the form of ADSs.  According to the ADS depositary’s records, which contain information regarding the ownership of our ADSs, there were, on March 30, 2012, 38April, 2013, 37 record holders of ADSs in the United States.

B.Related Party Transactions

Transactions with the State of São Paulo

We have entered into extensive transactions with the State, which is our controlling shareholder, and we expect to continue to do so.  The State is our largest customer.  It owns some of the facilities that we use in our business, it is one of the governmental entities that regulate our business, and it has assisted us in obtaining financing on favorable terms.

Many of our transactions with the State reflect policies of the State that depend on decisions of elected officials or public servants, and are accordingly subject to change.  Among the practices that could change are those described below concerning the provision of State guarantees, and the terms on which we use State-ownedState‑owned reservoirs.

RendingRendering Services

We provide water and sewage services to the federal government, state and municipal governments and government entities in the ordinary course of our business. Sales of water and sewage servicesGross revenue from sales to the State, including State entities, totaled R$358.3431.0 million in 2009,2012, R$405.0 million in 2011 and R$383.5 million in 2010 and R$405.0 million in 2011.2010.  Our accounts receivable from the State for water supply and sewage services totaled R$169.5 million, R$157.265.5 million and R$145.4 million, as of December 31, 2009, 20102012 and 2011, respectively.  In addition, as required by law, we invest our cash and cash equivalents with government financial institutions in short-term securities.institutions.

106


Payment of Pensions

Pursuant to a law enacted by the State, certain former employees of some State-ownedState owned companies that provided services to us in the past and later merged to form our Company acquired a legal right to receive supplemental pension benefit payments.  These rights are referred to as “Plan G0.”  These amounts are paid by us, on behalf of the State, and are claimed by us as reimbursements from the State, as primary obligor.  In 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, we made payments to former employees of R$108.0132.7 million, R$118.4124.4 million and R$124.4118.4 million, respectively, in respect of Plan G0.  The State made reimbursements in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 in the amount of R$83.7104.4 million, R$59.089.5 million and R$60.485.1 million, respectively.

Agreements with the State

In September 1997, we and the State entered into a memorandum of understanding providing that we would, in effect, apply dividends we declared that were otherwise payable to the State to offset accounts receivable in connection with the provision of water and sewage services to the State and its controlled entities.


On December 11, 2001, we entered into an agreement with the State and the DAEE.  Pursuant to this agreement, the State acknowledged and agreed, subject to an audit by a State‑appointed auditor, to pay us amounts it owed to us in respect of:

§·        water and sewage services we provided to governmental agencies, State‑owned autonomous entities and foundations through December 1, 2001, and that was not offset in accordance with the September 1997 memorandum of understanding, in the total amount of R$358.2 million.  This amount was renegotiated and included in the second amendment to this agreement discussed below; and

§ ·supplemental retirement and pension benefits we paid from March 1986 to November 2001 on behalf of the State to former employees of the State‑owned companies which merged to form our Company; as we did not reach an agreement regarding these amounts, a joint inquiry has commenced in order to ensure agreement between us and the State, in the total amount of R$320.6 million.  This amount was renegotiated and included in the third amendment to this agreement discussed below.

The agreement provided that the DAEE would transfer to us ownership of the Taiaçupeba, Jundiaí, Biritiba, Paraitinga and Ponte Nova reservoirs (herein after referred to as “the reservoirs”), which form the Alto Tietê system, and that the fair value of these assets would reduce the amounts owed to us by the State.

Under the December 2001 agreement, in 2002, a State-ownedState‑owned construction company (Companhia Paulista de Obras e Serviços), or the CPOS, on behalf of the State, and an independent appraisal firm (Engenharia de Avaliações), or the ENGEVAL, on our behalf, presented their valuation reports relating to the reservoirs.  Under the agreement, the arithmetic average of these appraisals is deemed the fair value of the reservoirs.  The appraisals contained in these reports were in the amounts of R$335.8 million and R$341.2 million, respectively.  Because we had already made investments in these reservoirs by then, the arithmetic average of the appraisals submitted to our board of directors by August 2002, R$300.9 million, was net of a percentage corresponding to these investments.  Our board of directors approved the valuation reports.This amount was updated until September 2008 according to IPCA index and amounted to R$696.3 million.

Under the December 2001 agreement, for amounts due in excess of the fair value of the reservoirs, the State is to make payments in 114 consecutive monthly installments.  The nominal amount owed by the State would not be indexed to inflation or earn interest if there was a delay in concluding the appraisal of fair value.  The installments will be indexed on a monthly basis by the IGP‑M index, plus 6.0% per year, starting on the date the first installment becomes due.

On October 29, 2003, the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo (Ministério Público do Estado de São Paulo), on behalf of the people of the State, brought a civil public action in a Trial Court of the State of São Paulo (12a Vara da Fazenda Pública do Estado de São Paulo) alleging that a transfer to us of ownership of the Alto Tietê system reservoirs from the DAEE would be illegal.  An injunction against the transfer of ownership of such reservoirs was granted but was later reversed.  However, in October 2004, the court of first instance handed down its judgment on the civil public action and declared the agreement between us, DAEE and State of São Paulo null and void.  This decision was suspended by us, and the State treasury and DAEE appealed the decision.  On August 23,2010, the appeal was denied.  We have petitioned for clarification of the appeal court’s decision and will seek to take the case to the Supreme Court.  The effects of the appeal court’s decision will be suspended until the end of the legal process.  Our legal counsel hasWe have assessed the risk of loss as probable, which would prohibit the transfer of the reservoirs in payment of the accounts receivable due from the State.

107


The December 2001 agreement also provided that the legal advisors of the State would carry out specific analyses, which have commenced, to ensure agreement among the parties as to the methodology employed in determining the amount of reimbursement for pension benefits owed to us by the State.  The commencement of payments with respect to pension amounts owed to us by the State has been postponed until these analyses are completed, the appraisal report is approved and the credit assignments relating to the transfer of the reservoirs are formalized.  As discussed above, the transfer of these reservoirs is currently being disputed and we are not certain whether the transfer will be legally permitted.  Under the December 2001 agreement, the first payment was to be made in July 2002.

On March 22, 2004, we and the State entered into a first amendment to the December 2001 agreement.  Under this amendment, the State acknowledged that it owed R$581.8 million to us relating to unpaid accounts receivable from the State until February 29, 2004, and we acknowledged that we owed an aggregate amount of R$518.7 million to the State as dividends, in the form of interest on shareholders’ equity.  Accordingly, we and the State agreed to offset each other’s credit up to the limit of R$404.9 million, which was an amount adjusted up to February 2004.  The outstanding balance of R$176.9 million (as ofFebruary 29, 2004) of the State’s consolidated debt would be paid in consecutive monthly installments from May 2005 until April 2009.  These installments would be indexed according to the IPCA index, plus an interest rate of 0.5% per month.  Upon the execution of the first amendment, part of the debt that the State owed to us for the use of water and sewage services through February 2004 was offset by the debt that we owed to the State as dividends, in the form of interest on shareholders’ equity.  The outstanding balance of R$113.8 million as dividends in the form of interest on shareholders’ equity that we owed to the State was netted against accounts overdue after February 2004.  The first amendment did not amend the provisions of the December 2001 agreement regarding the supplemental retirement and pension benefits we paid from March 1986 to November 2001 on behalf of the State to former employees of the State-ownedState‑owned companies.


On December 28, 2007, we and the State entered into a second amendment to the December 2001 agreement, pursuant to which the State agreed to pay (i) the outstanding balance under the first amendment, in the amount of R$133.7 million (as of November 30, 2007), in 60 consecutive monthly installments, beginning on January 2, 2008, and (ii) the amount of R$236.1 million relating to part of the accounts overdue and unpaid from March 2004 through October 2007 regarding the provision of water supply and sewage collection services.  As part of this amendment, we agreed to pay during the period from January through March 2008 the outstanding balance of dividends in the amount of R$400.8 million, in the form of interest on shareholders’ equity, due from March 2004 through December 2006.  We paid these amounts as agreed.  Under the second amendment, dividends payable by us are no longer required to be applied to offset accounts receivable from the State, and as a result, we are currently unable to determine the amount, if any, of the declared dividends that the State will apply to current and future accounts receivable owed to us by the State or its entities.  In addition, pursuant to the second amendment, we and the State agreed on complying with certain mutual obligations relating (i) to the improvement of payment processes and budget management procedures; (ii) the rationalization of the use of water and the amount of water and sewage bills under the responsibility of the State; (iii) the recording of government entities with accounts overdue in a delinquency system or reference file; and (iv) the possibility of interrupting water supply to these entities in case of non-paymentnon‑payment of water and sewage bills.  Finally, this second amendment did not amend the provisions of the December 2001 agreement regarding the supplemental retirement and pension benefits we paid from March 1986 through November 2001 on behalf of the State to former employees of the State-ownedState‑owned companies that merged to form our Company.

In 2007, we received payment installments from the State in the amount of R$326.0 million.  As of December 31, 2007, our dividends payable to the State, due from 2004 through 2007, were in the amount of R$552.0 million.  We are currently unable to determine the amount, if any, of the declared dividends that the State will apply to current and future accounts receivable owed to us by the State or its entities.  The second amendment no longer requires that dividends be applied to offset accounts receivable from the State.

On March 26, 2008, we entered into a commitment agreement (termo de compromisso) with the State with the purpose of finding an alternate solution to the deadlock related to the amount owed by the State to us in connectionwith the supplemental retirement and pension benefits we paid from March 1986 to November 2001 on behalf of the State to former employees of the State-ownedState‑owned companies which merged to form our Company.  In this agreement, we and State committed to hiring specialized companies to carry out new valuations of the amounts owed to us by the State and of the reservoirs.  An independent consulting firm, FIPECAFI, has been retained to resolve the disagreement and validate the amount we paid from March 1986 through November 2001 on behalf of the State to former employees of the State-ownedState‑owned companies that merged to form our Company, which the State has not yet agreed to reimburse us hereinafter referred to as the “Disputed Reimbursement Amount”.Amount.”  In addition, FIPECAFI is performing,performed, together with another independent consulting firm, a new evaluation of the reservoirs that might be transferred to us as amortization of the reimbursement payable by the State to us.

108


On November 17, 2008, we, the State and DAEE entered into a third amendment to the December 2001 agreement, pursuant to which the State recognized a debt balance payable to us totaling R$915.3 million, hereinafter referred to as the “Undisputed Reimbursement Amount,” as adjusted based on the IPCA.  We accepted on a provisional basis the reservoirs as part of the payment of the Undisputed Reimbursement Amount and offered to the State a provisional settlement, recognizing a credit totaling R$696.3 million, corresponding to the value of the reservoirs located in the Alto Tietê region.  We and the State have agreed that the final offset will only be recorded when the effective transfer of the reservoirs is recorded at the Real Estate Registry.  The outstanding balance of Undisputed Reimbursement Amount, amounting to R$219.0 million, is being paid by the State in 114 consecutive monthly installments, as adjusted by the annual IPCA variation, plus interest accruing at the annual rate of 6.0%.  The first installment was paid in November 2008.

In addition to the Undisputed Reimbursement Amount, there is an outstanding balance relating to the Disputed Reimbursement Amount.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the Disputed Reimbursement Amount plus the reservoirs mentioned above, amounted to R$1,290.71,351.2 million, but due to the uncertainty regarding the recovery of the amount ourmanagement decided not to recognize the reimbursements.  See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements as ofofDecember 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 regarding the Disputed Reimbursement Amount. We and the State have agreed that the dispute relating to the Disputed Reimbursement Amount will not prevent us from carrying out the commitments made in the December 2001 agreement.  We are working with the State government to obtain legislative authorization to transfer the reservoirs to us.


In addition, the third amendment to the December 2001 agreement provides for the regularization of the monthly flow of benefits.  While we are liable for the monthly flow of benefits to the former employees of the state-ownedstate‑owned companies that merged to form our Company, the State shall reimburse us based on criteria identical to those applied when determining the Undisputed Reimbursement Amount.  Should there be no preventive court decision, the State will assume the flow of monthly payment of benefits portion deemed as undisputed.

Finally, the third amendment to the December 2001 agreement established that the Public Attorney’s Office of the State of São Paulo, or the Public Attorney’s Office, would issue a revised interpretation of the calculation and eligibility criteria applicable to the Disputed Reimbursement Amount.  At that time, we believed that the Public Attorney’s Office would issue a revised interpretation which would have helped us bring the negotiations with the State to a conclusion.  However, contrary to our expectations, the Public Attorney’s Office recent interpretation of the calculation and eligibility criteria applicable to the Disputed Reimbursement Amount refuted the reimbursement of the largest portion of this amount.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had made a provision of R$1,512.11,547.2 million in our pension obligations accounts in respect of the Disputed Reimbursement Amount.pension benefit obligation of Plan G0.

Even though the negotiations with the State are still progressing, we cannot assure you that we will recover the receivables related to the Disputed Reimbursement Amount.

We will not waive the receivables from the State to which we consider ourselves to be legally entitled.  Accordingly, we will take all possible actions to resolve the issue at all administrative and court levels.  Should this conflict persist, we will take all the necessary actions to protect our interests.  On March 24, 2010, we sent to the controlling shareholder the official letter approved by our executive committee, proposing that the matter be discussed at the BM&FBOVESPA Arbitration Chamber.  In June 2010, we sent a settlement proposal to the Secretary of Treasury, which was denied, and (iii) on November 9, 2010, we filed a civil lawsuit against the State of São Paulo seeking full reimbursement of the amounts paid as benefits granted by Law No. 4,819/58.  Regardless of the civil lawsuit, we will continue to actively seek a settlement with the State government.

109


Agreement with the State and the city of São Paulo

On June 23, 2010 the State and the city of São Paulo entered into a convention (convênio) with the intermediation and consent of our Company and of the ARSESP pursuant to which they agreed to jointly manage the planning of and investment in the basic sanitation system of the city of São Paulo, among other things.  This agreement established that the State and the city of São Paulo would enter into an agreement with us, granting us exclusive rights in the provision of water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo.  In addition, the agreement established the role of the ARSESP in regulating and overseeing our activities, and established a management committee that will be responsible for planning the water and sewage services and for reviewing our investment plans.  The management committee is composed of six members appointed for renewable two-yeartwo‑year terms.  The State and the city of São Paulo have the right to appoint three members each.  We are permitted to participate in the meetings of the management committee, but we are not afforded any voting rights.

On June 23, 2010 we entered into a formal agreement with the State and the City of São Paulo executed an agreement in the form of aconvênio, to which we and ARSESP consented, under which they agreed to manage the planning and investment for the basic sanitation system of the city of São Paulo on a joint basis.  The principal terms of thisconvênio were as follows:

•      The State and the City of São Paulo would execute a separate agreement with us, granting us exclusive rights to provide water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo.

•      ARSESP would regulate the provision ofand oversee our activities regarding water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo, including tariffs.

•      A management committee (Comitê Gestor) would be responsible for planning water and sewage services for the city and for reviewing our investment plans.  The management committee consists of six members appointed for two-year terms.  The State and the City of São Paulo have the right to appoint three members each.  We may participate in management committee meetings but may not vote.

In application of theconvênio, we executed a 30-year period,separate contract with the State and the city of São Paulo, also dated June 23, 2010, to regulate the provision of these services for the following 30 years.  The principal terms of this contract are as follows:

•      The total investment stated in the contract must be equal to 13% of gross revenues from the provision of services to the city of São Paulo, net of the taxes on revenues, which may be extended for an additional 30-year period.  Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009 authorizedtotal approximately R$500 million per year.

We must transfer 7.5% of the gross revenues we derive under theconvênio, and subtract (i) COFINS and PASEP taxes, and (ii) unpaid bills of publicly owned properties in the city of São Paulo, to enter into an agreement with us.  The agreement establishes, among other things, how specific amounts of gross revenues from the services we render should be allocated (after deduction of COFINSMunicipal Fund for Environmental Sanitation and PASEP).  This agreement requires, among other things, (i) to invest at least 13.0% of the gross revenues from sales and services we obtain from the municipality of São Paulo, net of taxes on revenues in the improvement of water and sewage infrastructure in the city of São Paulo; (ii) that ourInfrastructure (Fundo Municipal de Saneamento Ambiental e Infraestrutura),  established by Municipal Law No. 14,934/2009.

•      Our investment plan must be compatible with the activities and programs included in the sanitation planplans of the State, the sanitation plan of the cityCity of São Paulo and, if necessary, the Metropolitan region.

•      ARSESP will ensure that the tariffs will adequately compensate us for the services we provide and that tariffs may be adjusted in order to restore the original balance between each party’s obligations and economic gain (equilíbrio econômico financeiro).

•      We currently have an investment plan in place that reflects these obligations and addresses their compatibility with the sanitation planplans of the metropolitan regionState, the City of São Paulo;Paulo and, (iii) that we contribute 7.5% ofif necessary, the gross revenues we obtain from this agreement to the São Paulo Municipal Sanitation Fund.Metropolitan region.  The investment plan under this agreement is not irrevocable and will be reviewed by our management committee every four years, especiallyparticularly with regardsrespect to the investments to be executed in the subsequent period. In addition, the agreement provides that the ARSESP, the State agency responsible for regulating the basic sanitation industry, will ensure that the tariffs charged (a) will adequately compensate us for the services we provide and (b) can be adjusted to restore the original balance between each party’s obligation and economic gain(equilíbrio econômico-financeiro).  We currently have an investment plan in place that consider these obligations and also addresses the compatibility with the activities and programs included in the sanitation plan of the State and of the municipality of São Paulo and, if necessary, the plan of the metropolitan region of São Paulo. See “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Our Operation—Operations in the City of São Paulo and Certain Metropolitan Regions.”


Dividends

We regularly pay dividends to our shareholders, including the State of São Paulo.  In the past, we have withheld part of the dividends to which the State was entitled in order to offset it against our pending receivables from the State.

110


In accordance with our agreements with the State, we do not anticipate that we will withhold dividends to which the State was entitled in order to offset it against our pending receivables from the State in the near future.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our cash and cash equivalents invested with State financial institutions in short-term securities amounted to R$722.2 million, R$1,945.7 million and R$2,070.2 million, as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.  Interest income from these investments totaled R$74.2 million in 2009, R$137.7 million in 2010 and R$271.8 million in 2011.

Government Guarantees of Financing

In some situations, the federal government, the State or government agencies guarantee our performance under debt-debt‑ and project-relatedproject‑related agreements.

Furthermore, the federal government has guaranteed, and the State has provided a counter-guarantee,counter‑guarantee, in respect of the financial agreements we entered into with the IADB (i) in 1992 and 2000 for the total original aggregate amount of US$650.0 million related to the financing of the first and second phases of the Tietê River recovery project to reduce pollution; and (ii) in 2010 for the aggregate amount of US$600 million related to the financing of the third phase of the Tiête River project.  The federal government has also guaranteed and the State of São Paulo has provided a counter-guarantee,counter‑guarantee, in respect of the financial agreement we entered with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) in the amount of US$100 million for the Water Source Program (Programa Mananciais)(Programa Mananciais).

We also entered into credit agreements with the JICA, which were guaranteed by the federal government, with counter-guaranteecounter‑guarantee from the State of São Paulo, for the financing of (i) the Clean Wave Program for the Baixada Santista metropolitan region, in August 6, 2004, for an aggregate principal amount of ¥21,320 million; (ii) the second phase of the Clean Wave Program, in February 2011, for an aggregate principal amount of ¥19,169 million; (iii) the environmental improvement program in the basin of the Billings dam, as part of the New Life Program (Programa(Programa Vida Nova)Nova), in October 2010, for an aggregate principal amount of ¥6,208 million; and (iv) the Corporate Program for Water Loss Reduction, in February 2012, for an aggregate principal amount of ¥33,584 millionmillion.

The State has also guaranteed a portion of our repayment obligations under loan agreements that we entered into with the federal government in 1994 through its financial agent, Banco do Brasil S.A. which totaled R$828.2480.9 million as of December 31, 2011.

In addition, we are currently negotiating with Caixa and BNDES for additional loans to finance portions of our capital expenditure program.2012.

For more information on the aforementioned loans, see “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Sources—Indebtedness Financing.”

Use of State-Owned Reservoirs

We currently use the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs, which are ownedalso used by another company controlled by the São Paulo State Government, based on a grant issued by the DAEE.  We do not pay any fees with respect to the use of these reservoirs.  We are, however, responsible for maintaining them and funding their operatingcosts.  The State incurs no operating costs on our behalf.  If these facilities were not available for our use, we would have to obtain water from more distant sources, which would be more costly.


Agreements with Lower Tariffs

We have entered into agreements with public entities, including State entities and municipalities, which manage approximately 5,7007,600 properties.  Under these agreements, these public entities pay a different tariff which is approximately 25.0% lower than the tariff that applies for the public entities that have not entered into these agreements, provided such entities implement our PURA program for the rational use of water, which includes a reduction of at least 10.0% in water consumption.  These agreements are valid for a 12-month12‑month term with automatic renewal for equal periods.  Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, if these entities fail to make any payment on a timely basis to us, we have the right to cancel the agreement, thereby revoking the 25.0% tariff reduction.

111


Personnel Assignment Agreement among Entities Related to the State Government

We have personnel assignment agreements with entities related to the State Government, under which the expenses are fully passed on and monetarily reimbursed.  The expenses related to personnel assigned by us to other state government entities in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 amounted to R$5.412.3 million, R$10.9 million and R$5.6 million, and R$10.9 million, respectively.

In 2012 and 2011, none of our personnel had been assigned by other entities. Inentities; and in 2010, and 2009, the expenses related to personnel assigned by other entities to us totaled R$0.3 million.

Services Obtained from State Government Entities

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, we had an outstanding amount payable of R$12.11.0 million, R$11.412.1 million and R$10.411.4 million, respectively, for services rendered by São Paulo State government entities, including the supply of electric power by CESP.

Non-operatingNon‑operating Assets

We lend land, free of charge, to associations, support entities,DAEE.  Such non‑governmental organizations and to DAEE, among others.  Such non-operatingoperating assets totaled R$26.51.0 million, R$25.42.3 million and R$21.52.3 million as of December 31, 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, of which R$2.3 million was lent to DAEE, as of December 31, 2011.respectively.

Banco do Brasil

We filed a lawsuit against the Department of Finance of the State São Paulo seeking financial compensation related to the transfer of our exclusive rights in bank services.  On March 27, 2007, the State of SaoSão Paulo sold exclusive rights in the provision of banking services administration entities directly and indirectly in favor of Banco Nossa Caixa.  On May 27, 2010, the State of SaoSão Paulo sold them in favor of Banco do Brasil.  In this lawsuit, we were pleading financial compensation for the sale of its exclusive rights, requiring a percentage of the values that the State of São Paulo received from each of the financial institutions for the services contract entered into.

On June 28, 2011, we entered into an agreement with the State of SaoSão Paulo for the , whereby we received the amount of R$63.4 million upon reduction, as compensation of credit held by the State, corresponding to interests on shareholders’ equity in the fiscal year 2010.

Transactions with SABESPREV Pension Fund

SABESPREV is a pension fund we established to provide our employees with retirement and pension benefits.  The assets of SABESPREV are independently held, but we nominate 50.0% of SABESPREV’s board of directors, including the chairman of the board, who has the deciding vote pursuant to the applicable legislation.  Both we and our employees make contributions to SABESPREV pension plans.  We contributed R$12.97.4 million, R$8.9 million and R$13.8 million in 2012, 2011 and R$8.9 million in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.  On May 29, 2001, a federal law was enacted which, among other provisions, limits the amount mixed capital companies, like us, may contribute to their pension plans.  Specifically, the ordinary contributions made by us to our pension plans may not exceed the contributions made by the beneficiaries of these plans.

Our original pension plan (the Defined Benefit Plan) has an actuarial deficit.  We have commenced studies to manage this deficit and have also created a new, defined contribution plan, SabesprevSABESPREV Mais.  Our new plan was approved by the Previc in June 2010, after which our old plan stopped accepting new members.  Contributions to the new plan are also shared between plan members and Sabesp,SABESP, and benefits are established based on the balance of the individual member’s account when payment on his or her benefitbegins.  This balance consists of contributions and profitability obtained when applying resources.  We intended to have members of the old plan migrate their reserves to the new plan.  This migration was temporarily interrupted by a judicial order as a result of proceedings brought by representative entities for our employees and ex-employees.ex‑employees.  In October 2010, the judge presiding over the case pronounced in an interim decision that people and reserves were not allowed to migrate between the plans until a further decision was made.  This decision also prevents the plan from charging contributions to account for the deficit for those who remained covered by the original plan.

112



 

Compensation of Management

The compensation paid by us to the members of our board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal committee amounted to R$2.63.4 million, R$2.8 million and R$2.8 million in 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011,respectively, and it refers to salaries and other short-termshort‑term benefits to employees and management.  An additional amount of R$0.80.7 million, R$0.81.1 million and R$1.10.8 million related to the bonus program was accrued in 2009, 20102012, 2011 and 2011. 2010.

For further information on management compensation, see “Item 6.B. Compensation.”

Loan agreement through credit facility

             The Company holds interests in some companies, not holding the majority interest but with power of veto in some issues. Therefore, these companies are considered for accounting purposes as jointly controlled entities, and are proportionately consolidated.

             The Company entered into a loan agreement through credit facility with the Águas de Andradina S.A., Águas de Castilho S.A., and Aquapolo Ambiental S.A. to finance the operations of these companies, until the loans and financing required to banks are cleared.

             The contracts signed on January 19, 2012 with Águas de Andradina and Águas de Castilho were settled in July 2012, according to the agreement’s provisions. On July 18, 2012, new agreements were signed with both companies, pursuant to the terms and conditions in the table below. The agreement signed with Aquapolo Ambiental on March 30, 2012 remains with the same features, according to the table below:

Companies

 

Credit limit

 

Principal disbursed

 

Interest balance

 

Interest rate

 

Maturity

Águas de Andradina

 

3,467

 

1,427

 

21

 

SELIC + 3.5% p.a.

 

07/17/2013

Águas de Castilho

 

675

 

403

 

6

 

SELIC + 3.5% p.a.

 

07/17/2013

Aquapolo Ambiental

 

5,629

 

5,629

 

519

 

CDI + 1.2% p.a.

 

04/30/2016

Aquapolo Ambiental

 

19,000

 

19,000

 

1,076

 

CDI + 1.2% p.a.

 

04/30/2015

Total

 

28,771

 

26,459

 

1,622

 

 

 

 

The amount disbursed is recognized in assets, in “Other receivables” and amounts to R$1,830 for principal and R$27 for interest recognized in current assets and R$24,629 for principal and R$1,595 for interest in noncurrent assets. As of December 31, 2012, the balance of principal and interest of these contracts is R$28,081. In 2012, financial income was impacted by R$1,672, referring to these loans; of which R$1,622 refers to outstanding agreements and R$50 refers to agreements settled in July 2012.

C.Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See “Item 3.A. Selected Financial Data” and “Item 18.  Financial Statements.”

113


Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of our business, we are a party to judicial and administrative proceedings relating to civil, environmental, labor and tax matters.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we estimated that these legal proceedings totaled R$24,152.036,866.9 million (excluding the amount of R$133.1330.2 million related to court deposits).  This amount was based on probable, possible and remote losses and on the value attributed to the lawsuit by the plaintiffs in some cases and on the economic value of the lawsuits in others.  Out of the total amount of contingenciesrisks as of December 31, 2011,2012, approximately R$2,367.22,496.7 million relate to tariff-relatedtariff related legal proceedings and consumers claims, approximately R$1,147.8927.7 million relate to contractors’ claims, approximately R$1,105.71,158.7 million relate to tax proceedings, approximately R$349.7394.0 million relate to labor proceedings, approximately R$18,405.131,117.9 million relate to civil public actions related to environmental matters and approximately R$776.4771.9 million relate to other civil matters.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the provision for legal contingenciesrisks totaled R$1,571.81,189.2 million (excluding the amount of R$120.7317.0 million related to court deposits), of which R$618.5521.3 million relate to tariff-relatedtariff related legal proceedings and consumers claims, R$420.8115.2 million relate to contractors’ claims, R$76.468.1 million relate to tax proceedings, R$156.5171.7 million relate to labor proceedings, R$121.2148.4 million relate to civil public actions related to environmental matters and R$178.4164.5 million relate to other civil matters.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2011,2012, our estimated contingenciesrisks with respect to legal proceedings, categorized by potential risk of loss:

 

Total Value

 

(in thousandsmillions ofreais

Expected probable loss

1,571,8291,189.2

Expected possible loss

2,621,8002,796.7

Expected remote loss

19,958,34632,881.0

Total

24,151,97536,866.9

 

The difference between the provisioned amount and the total amount of the contingencies derives from the methodology for establishing our provisions.  This methodology takes into account:  (i)account the probability of loss of each lawsuit, based on the alleged facts, the claim based on the factual circumstances vis-vis‑à-vis‑vis the law, as well as prevailing precedents in similar cases; and (ii) the calculation of the provisioned amounts, which requires significant judgment and in certain circumstances, given the nature of the claim, we are unable to estimate with accuracy our liability exposure.  In these cases, we have taken into account the value attributed to the lawsuits by the plaintiff and legal opinions of counsel in charge of each lawsuit.cases.  Once the methodology is applied, as a general rule, we make the provisions only for the lawsuits that are considered as probable losses.


We cannot give any assurances either asJudgments regarding future events, the results of which may differ significantly from actual estimates, could exceed the amounts provisioned. Provisions are revised and adjusted to the sufficiency of the provisioned amount to cover the contingencies or as to the total amount of potential liabilities that we may incur or penalties that may be imposed.take into consideration changes in circumstances involved.  We may not obtain a favorable outcome in the administrative or court proceedings to which we are a party. In addition, the total amount of the contingencies, based on the value attributed to the lawsuit by the plaintiff, may not correspond to the economic value of the lawsuits, which may be substantially higher than the total estimated amount of contingencies.  If the economic outcome of these lawsuits is higher than the amount attributed to the lawsuit by the plaintiff or, in the event the total amount of our provisions are not sufficient to pay the contingenciesrisks due, we could incur greater costs than those that were originally estimated.  If these costs are significant, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Any substantial monetary judgment against us in legal proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us.”

Civil Public Actions Related to Environmental Matters

We have been suedare subject to administrative and judicial proceedings, including proceedings initiated by the company of Environmental Sanitation Technology (Companhia de Technologia de Saneamento Ambiental – Cetesb), Public Prosecution OfficeProsecutor of the State of São Paulo (Ministério Público do Estado de São Paulo), by some municipalities and by some non-governmental organizations in a number ofamong others.  These result from proceedings alleged environmental civil public actions:damage including proceedings:  (i) seeking that we cease releasing raw sewage into certain local water courses; (ii) in some cases seeking remedies for environmental damages, which have not yet been specified and evaluated by the court’s technical experts; and (iii) seeking to require us to install and operate sewage treatment facilities in the locations referred to in the civil public actions.  In eachcertain case, we are subject to daily fines for non-compliance.non‑compliance.  In our response to these lawsuits we emphasize that the installation and operation of sewage treatment facilities in the locations referred to in the civil public actions is included in our investment plan and that the immediate cessation of the release of raw sewage into the relevant local water courses would hinder us from collecting sewage, a primary necessity, in those locations, causing even more damage to the environment and public health.plan.  There have already been unfavorable judicial decisions against us.  The effects may include:  (i) investment in works or services not considered by the long-termlong‑term investment plan; (ii) early execution of works or services that wereconsidered for execution in future years in the long-termlong‑term investment plan; (iii) payments related to environmental indemnification; and (iv) a negative impact on our image in national and international markets and in public bodies.

114


Although we are not able to predict the final outcome of these lawsuits, we believe that the outcome, if unfavorable to us, may have a material adverse effect on us.

The civil public lawsuits related to environmental matters to which we are party include the following:

§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo has brought a civil public action requesting remedies due to environmental damage caused by the release of sludge from the Rio Grande water treatment facilities into certain receiving waters and the Billings reservoir and seeking the immediate cessation of this activity and the implementation of an environmental recovery project.  The Trial Court ruled in our favor, and there was a subsequent appeal against this decision.  In May 2006, the appellate court ruled against us and ordered us to cease the release of sludge within a year from the final ruling.  The court also determined that the environmental recovery must be carried out within two years of the date of the ruling, under the penalty of a daily fine of R$10,000 to compensate for environmental damage.  We appealed from this decision and the court decided against us in a final decision.  We are currently studying a proposal to be made to the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo on how to implement the environmental recovery we have been imposed.  As of December 31, 2011, we had provisioned R$1.2 million for the effects of this lawsuit.
§A public civil action filed by the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo against us and the Cotia Mayor’s Office seeking individual and joint adverse judgments against the defendants and requesting:  (i) the permanent cessation of the release of untreated water effluents into the Cotia River or its tributaries, subject to a daily fine in the case of non-compliance; (ii) the treatment of sewage prior to its release into the Cotia River, under the penalty of a daily fine in the event of non-compliance; (iii) the full restoration of soil, of surface and underground water bodies and of vegetation to their original condition, under the penalty of a daily fine in the event of non-compliance; (iv) the payment of compensation for environmental damage caused to soil, water sources and underground and surface water bodies that cannot be recovered. The appellate court rendered decisions favorable to us with respect to items (i), (iii) and (iv) mentioned above.  According to evaluations by the court’s technical expert, as of October 17, 2006, compensation for environmental damages was R$826.8 thousand or R$5.8 million if damage caused to the neighboring Cotia River is included.  This amount is under discussion, and its approval is subject to a final decision by the court of first instance.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as probable.  In December 2011, the court’s technical expert’s evaluation for the compensation was adjusted to R$11.6 million.  Thelawsuit is currently being enforced against us. We are in negotiation with the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo to settle this lawsuit.


§In 2003, the Piracicaba Civil Entities Coordination Board filed a public civil action against us, the ANA and the Government of the State of São Paulo, seeking remedy for damage caused by the use of the Piracicaba, Jundiaí and Capivari river basins to supply the São Paulo metropolitan region through the Cantareira Water System for nearly 30 years.  The value attributed to the claim was R$11.4 billion on December 10, 2003, and later adjusted to R$17.2 billion as of December 31, 2011. The lawsuit was dismissed on July 8, 2011, but the Piracicaba Civil Entities Coordination Board filed a motion for the clarification of a certain aspect of that decision. Having the motion rejected, the plaintiff may file an appeal to the Superior Courts. So far no value has been set for the damages alleged.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as remote.  No provision has been made for this lawsuit.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo has filed a public civil action against us, AES Eletropaulo, DAEE, CETESB and the State Secretariat of Treasury seeking a joint condemnation for alleged environmental damage caused by the reversal of the Pinheiros River into the Billings Dam.  A Trial Court found the defendants guilty and, based on an expert’s report which estimated the amount of damages, ruled that the defendants jointly pay R$284.5 million in damages.  As of December 31, 2011, the amount of damages totaled R$618.3 million, after monetary adjustment.  We, DAEE, AES Eletropaulo, CETESB and the State Treasury Department have filed an appeal against the ruling at the appellate court.  The appellate court ruled in our favor, and the plaintiff appealed from this decision.  We are currently awaiting the decision on the plaintiff’s appeal.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as remote.  No provision has been made for this lawsuit.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo has filed a civil public action against us seeking (i) that we cease releasing untreated sewage into receiving waters and into the soil; (ii) that we implement a sewage system in the municipality of Vargem Grande Paulista and the necessary infrastructure for the sewage treatment; and (iii) indemnification for irreversible damages caused to the environment and public health, subject to daily fines.  The trial court ruled partially against us, and we appealed unsuccessfully. We have filed appeals for the Superior Courts. Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as probable.  The value attributed to the lawsuit was R$3.0 million as of November 20, 2007, and later adjusted to R$3.8million as of December 31, 2011.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action against us and the Piracaia Mayor’s Office seeking that we cease to release untreated residential sewage in the Atibaia River or be subject to specific performance or a daily fine.  The value attributed to the lawsuit was R$3.5 million as of July 11, 1996, and later adjusted to R$100 thousand, which was updated to R$262 thousand as of December 31, 2011. This lawsuit is in its initial stage, pending judgment from the trial court.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as possible. No provision has been made for this lawsuit.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action against us seeking that we (i) cease to release untreated sewage effluents into the Capivari river in the municipality of Campos do Jordão within 540 days from the filing of the lawsuit, subject to a daily fine of R$100,000; and (ii) fully restore the environmental damage or indemnify the State for such damages if restoration is not viable.  The court of first instance ruled against us, and we appealed. The appellate court also ruled against us, but reduced the daily fine to R$10,000. We have appealed the appellate court’s ruling and are currently waiting for a ruling on our appeal.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as probable. We have entered into a settlement with the Public Prosecution Office of the São Paulo on July 11, 2011 agreeing to build a sewage treatment station by December 31, 2013.  As compensation for the environmental damage, we have agreed to recover 10 (ten) hectares of the damaged area in Campos do Jordão, planting approximately 16,667 trees, of which 39% should be of exotic species for public exhibition at certain blocks of Avenue Emílio Ribas, at Capivari. We also agreed to expand the sewage system of that municipality and to create a center for environmental education.
§On April 12, 2005, the Federal Public Prosecution Office and the Federal Government sued us and the Santos Mayor’s Office requesting (i) the full restoration of the area where the outlet pipes were built to its original condition, with appropriate technical safeguards, and the conservation of the remaining trees; (ii) the maintenance of the area in a condition that is adequate for its use for the population; (iii) that an environmental license be obtained before any modification to the sewage outlet pipes, with the requirement that the license and anobligatory environmental impact study and report (Estudo Prévio de Impacto Ambiental e Relatório de Impacto Ambiental, or EIA-RIMA, be submitted for approval to the appropriate federal authorities; and (iv) the restoration of the area to the condition it was in prior to the construction of the sewage outlet pipe platform, provided this is determined to be feasible pursuant to the EIA-RIMA. The trial court ruled in our favor, but the Federal Public Prosecution Office and the Federal Government filed an appeal against that decision.  We have submitted additional evidence for consideration, and we are waiting for the decision of the Regional Federal Court.  Our legal counsel has assessed the risk of loss as possible. The value attributed to the lawsuit was R$2.1 million as of December 31, 2011. No provision has been made for this lawsuit.

§On October 19, 2009, the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action against us and the municipality of Itatiba seeking that we (i) cease releasing untreated sewage in Itatiba or be subject to a daily fine of R$10,000; (ii) fully restore within one year the soil, the surface and underground water bodies and vegetation to their original condition, or be subject to a daily fine of R$10,000 in the event of non compliance; (iii) indemnify the State for damages when restoration is not viable; and (iv) indemnify the State in an amount not less than R$2.0 million for moral damages.  This lawsuit is in its initial stage and is pending judgment from the trial court.  As of December 31, 2011, the value attributed to this lawsuit was R$31.4 thousand.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as possible.  No provision has been made for this lawsuit.
§

On August 8, 2008, the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo won a civil public action against us requiring us, within a maximum of three years, to treat all domestic sewage in Águas de Santa Bárbara before releasing it into any waterway, or be subject to a daily fine of R$1,000, as from August 8, 2008 for a maximum period of 18 months.  We appealed and were waiting the appeal court’s judgment until we entered entered into a settlement with the Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo on August 05, 2011. Through this settlement, we agreed to create a treatment facility for the domestic sewage of Águas de Santa Bárbara until October 2012, and also to abstain from releasing any non-treated domestic sewage into a waterway in that area.

§A civil public action was brought against us by the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo.  We appealed an unfavorable decision of the trial court, and the appeal court ruled against us, requiring us (i) to cease to release any untreated sewage into the river system in the Guareí region, or be subject to a fine of R$150,000 for each violation; (ii) to invest as necessary in the municipality of Guareí’s water treatment and sewage system so as to complete within 180 days all works necessary for sewage treatment, or be subject to a daily fine of R$100,000; (iii) to pay an indemnity in respect of all damage caused to the environment and to clean up any such damage in settlement of the judgment. The judgment was not clear as to the fines imposed and this led to an appeal, which the court refused in May 2010.  After the appeal court ruled against us, we applied to have this lawsuit heard by the State of São Paulo Court of Special and Extraordinary Measures (Recursos Especial e Extraordinário pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo), and that court is currently considering whether to hear the case.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as probable.  As of December 31, 2011, the value attributed to this lawsuit was R$38.4  million, based on the settlement offered by the State Public Prosecution Office in July 2010, and we have recorded provisions in this amount as of that date.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action against us, requiring us (i) to cease to release any untreated sewage from the Araça pre-treatment plant (Estação de Pré Condicionamento), or EPC, into the São Sebastião canal without obtaining the necessary environmental licenses, or be subject to a daily fine of R$100,000; (ii) to obtain and maintain the necessary environmental license to operate the Araça EPC, or be subject to a daily fine of R$100,000; (iii) to release into the São Sebastião canal only domestic sewage that complies with legal guidelines; (iv) to comply with all of the technical requirements set out in the environmental license, as well as the requirements specified following inspections by the CETESB; and (v) to pay an indemnity of R$50.0 million for environmental damage. The preliminary judgment was deferred, and we were required (i) to present to the court within six months the environmental license for the Araça EPC, or be subject to a daily fine of R$100,000, and (ii) to present to the court within 30 days a contract with a company to carry out an independent technical study with monthly reporting to monitor and collect samples from the areas of São Sebastião canal where there are underwater outlets from the Araça EPC, as well as from the beaches and mangroves within 8 km to the north of south of the Araça EPC. The sediment samples from the mangroves were required to be analyzed for the existence offecal coliforms as well as water quality.  This lawsuit is in its initial stage and is pending judgment from the court of first instance. Our legal counsel has assessed the risk of loss as possible.  The value attributed to the lawsuit as of December 31, 2011 was R$123.4  million.  No provision has been made for this lawsuit.


§The municipality of Águas de São Pedro filed a civil public action against us on September 14, 2004, with a request for summary judgment or the imposition of a daily fine.  This lawsuit aims to require us to undertake works and services necessary to remove the direct discharge of sewage beside the green areas and the Pantanal source and lake that are located close to Rua dos Pinheiros, in theBairro Jardim Iporangadistrict of the municipality of Águas de São Pedro.  It also aims to require us to pay indemnities for alleged damage caused to the environment, to health and to citizen’s property.  On June 26, 2006, the court of first instance ruled that the claim was without merit.  However, on September 22, 2009, the appeals court ruled that the claim was proven and granted an injunction, ordering us to comply with the requirement to clean up the environmental damage within 180 days in satisfaction of the judgment, and imposing a daily fine of R$5,000.  We appealed from this decision, and the court decided against us.  We filed another appeal from this decision and are currently awaiting its decision.  Our legal counsel has assessed the risk of loss as probable.  The value attributed to this lawsuit as of December 31, 2011 was R$2 million, and we have recorded provisions in this amount as of that date.  Currently, we are awaiting the response from the State of São Paulo Court of Special and Extraordinary Measures (Recursos Especial e Extraordinário pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo) in relation to this lawsuit.
§The Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action against us for the indemnification on environmental damages and for us to cease the  discharge of untreated sewage into the Alegre river in the area of the municipality of Paraguaçu Paulista. The first instance judge has ruled against us so that we (i) cease the  discharge of untreated sewage into Alegre river; (ii) to invest as necessary in that municipality’s water treatment and sewage system; and (iii) pay indemnities for alleged damage caused to the environment, which the court arbitrated at R$168.9 million. The court has also imposed a daily fine in case of disobedience of item (i) and (ii) above.  We appealed from this decision, and the court decided against us.  We then entered into a settlement with the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo, having agreed to pay R$34 million as indemnity for environmental damages and invest R$8.7 million within 54 months on the water treatment and sewage system. The deadlines and planning for the performance of the agreement have not yet been settled.  Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as probable.  As of December 31, 2011, we provisioned R$43.7 million for this matter.
§The municipality of Atibaia filed a civil public action against us on August 2010, for the indemnification on environmental and urban damages related to flood that took place in December 2009 and January 2010 and for us to take preventive steps to avoid new damages related to similar events. The first instance judge has granted the municipality of Atibaia an injunction ordering us to perform emergency repairs around the area of the Atibaia river, or be subject to a daily fine of R$50,000. We appealed from that decision, and the injunction was suspended by the second instance court. We currently await the decision of the superior courts on the injunction.  We still await a final judgment to resolve all matters of the lawsuit. The estimated amount for this lawsuit is R$ 1.9 million. Our legal counsel assessed the risk of loss as possible and no provision was made for this lawsuit.

We are currently involved in other environmental lawsuits and administrativeclassify certain of these proceedings against the release of untreated sewage in the municipalities, which have been evaluated as probable loss and possible losses.  The amounts provisioned may not always represent the final amount to be paid as compensation for the alleged damages, in view of the current status of the lawsuits and since our management cannot reasonably estimate the amounts of future disbursements.loss. As of December 31, 2011, the total amount2012 we have provisioned was R$121.2 million.148.4 million for such matters.

Labor Proceedings

We are party to labor proceedings, mainly regarding unpaid overtime,compensation for extra working hours, shift substitutions, additional health and safety conditionsrisk premiums, dismissed without cause, work assignment changes, wage parity, among other claims. There have already been partial or full judgments in the workplace, among others.  We makethese proceedings for which we have taken provisions for part or the entire amounts involved in the proceedings.  For those cases in which the probability of loss is assessedclaims considered as probable we provision the full amounts being discussed.

losses. As of December 31, 2011,2012, we were party to approximately 5,432585 labor proceedings and one public civil action filed by some of our current and former employees.  Some of these lawsuits seek to negotiate certainbenefits granted by Law No. 4,819 of August 26, 1958.  Our position in these lawsuits is that the State government, and not us, should be responsible for the payments due to the plaintiffs.  In the public civil action filed against us and the State Treasury, a temporary injunction was granted in the trial court requiring us to pay the benefits set forth in Law No. 4,819/58 to all the plaintiffs.  A trial court ruled on April 5, 2005, granting the relief sought under this proceeding and confirming the temporary injunction requiring us to continue to pay the benefits.  We have appealed this decision.decision, but remain subject to the temporary injunction and continue to pay the benefits. There are currently other pending individual lawsuits discussing the same claims, and up to the date of this report neither we nor the State government had reached an agreement as to the indemnification amounts related to these proceedings.


In order to continue to seek reimbursement of the amounts related to the payment of retirement benefits and pensions paid by us that our management understands is in fact owed by the State government, we have taken the following measures:  (i) on March 24, 2010, we sent a letter to our controlling shareholder in an attempt to start an arbitration proceeding before the BM&FBOVESPA arbitration chamber, (ii) In June 2010, we sent a settlement proposal to the Secretary of Treasury, which was denied, and (iii) on November 9, 2010, we filed a civil lawsuit against the State of São Paulo seeking full reimbursement of the amounts paid as benefits granted by Law No. 4,819/58 and we are waiting on the court’s decision.  Regardless of the civil lawsuit, we will continue to actively seek a settlement with the State government.

Among the mentioned labor proceedings, as of December 31, 2011, we were party to two collective lawsuits brought by the syndicate of the workers of the water and sewage systems and environment of the State of São Paulo (SINTAEMA). The first relates to the scheduling of the workers and we had a ruling against us in the amount of approximately R$62.6 million. This lawsuit in currently under enforcement calculations. A second lawsuit filed by that syndicate relates to the increase in 1.5% of our salary base for 2010/2011, as well as overtime adjustments. The court has ruled against us and we have filed an appeal to the superior labor court, where the appeal is currently under review. The approximated amount in dispute in this lawsuit is R$11.8 million as of December 31, 2011, with a probable risk of loss.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the total amount in controversy in the labor proceedings was R$301.6361.7 million for risks considered as probable and possible losses.  We have establishedrecorded a provision of R$156.5171.7 million as of December 31, 20112012 for these contingencies,risks, including the lawsuits described in the preceding paragraphs, based on calculations made by our legal and human resources departments.paragraphs.

Tax Proceedings

Our tax proceedings and our contingency reservesaccrual for risks for tax proceedings refer mainly to tax collection suits resulting from different interpretations by us and the competent government authority with respect to the applicable law. TheAs of December 31, 2012, we had recorded a provision of R$68.1 million for claims whose likelihood of loss is considered probable.The tax proceedings to which we are party to include the following:

§We are challenging the city of São Paulo’s taxation of the use of public areas for the installation of water and sewage mains for the provision of public sanitation services.  The tax was originally established by municipal decree No. 38,139/99 and later replaced by municipal decree No. 40,532/2001 and finally by the municipal Law No. 13,614/2003.  On February 22, 2000, we filed a writ of mandamus requesting an injunction to challenge this tax.  This first lawsuit covers the taxation before the enactment of municipal Law No. 13,614/2003.  The trial court ruled partially in our favor, by prohibiting the requirement to pay the tax provided for in this law, and the appellate court confirmed that the tax was not due.  The city of São Paulo appealed this decision, and a final decision is pending.  On April 20, 2004, we filed a writ of mandamus requesting temporary injunction against the collection of this tax based on challenges to Law No. 13,614/2003.  The court granted this injunction.  The São Paulo city government appealed this decision, and an appellate court decision is still pending.  We cannot estimate the potential increase in our expenses should we have to pay this tax for the use of public areas for the installation of water and sewage mains for the provision of public sanitation services should we be required to pay such tax since 1999.  We have not provisioned for any type of potential expense deriving from this municipal tax.
§The municipality of São Paulo has notified us of alleged infractions on the payment of Brazilian Service Tax (Imposto Sobre Serviço), or ISS. This charge is related to the enactment of municipal Law No. 13,476/2002, before which we were exempted from such charge. The municipality is charging the amount of approximately R$223.9 million in charges and penalties. We filed a writ of mandamus against the administrative decision that imposed those charges. The trial court originally granted a preliminary injunction in our favor in the writ of mandamus, suspending the levy of the tax, but later ruled against us.  In July 2005, we filed an appeal to maintain the injunction previously granted, which was denied in January 2012. We filed a motion to clarify items in this decision, which is under the review of the court.  On thesame matter, we filed a lawsuit confronting the basis for the charge, challenging Law No. 13,476/2002. We have been granted an injunction within this lawsuit that suspended the levy of the tax until the final judgment from the court. We are currently waiting for a final decision on this matter. The risk of loss has been considered as possible and we have not provisioned for any type of potential expense deriving from this municipal tax.

·We filed two writs of mandamus with the intention of declaring a municipal law unconstitutional that established a tax for installing water and sewage sanitation networks in public areas.  The first writ of mandamus was partially approved, but subsequently, the municipal law which it contested was repealed. The second writ of mandamus is pending the municipality’s challenge, but in the first instance it was decided to suspend the tax and that the municipality must post bond.  Management has evaluated the probability of the outcome to be a possible loss, although it is not possible to estimate the total amount involved.

·The City of São Paulo, through the creation of a law, repealed tax exemption concerning sanitation and sewage services that we performed and, after this, made tax claims regarding such services and ancillary activities, totaling R$264.6 million.  The outcome has been evaluated as a possible loss.  We made a petition for a writ of mandamus against the revocation of the tax exemption, and currently are waiting for the petition to be accepted.  Also, we filed injunctive and annulment actions, intending to suspend the claimfor credits and to annul such claim on the basis that activities related to sewerage treatment and ancillary activities are not listed as taxed activities by the City of São Paulo.  As there is no final decision, we evaluated the probability of loss as possible.

 

115



 

§We proposed to carry-over losses from previous years to offset an income tax liability of approximately R$56.1 million and a social contribution tax liability of approximately R$8.7 million.  These amounts refer to the period between January and April 2003.  In 2005, the Federal Revenue Service denied the set-off

·We proposed to carry over losses from previous years to offset an income tax liability of approximately R$56.1 million and a social contribution tax liability of approximately R$8.7 million.  These amounts arise from to the period between January and April 2003.  In 2005, the Federal Revenue Service denied the set off of approximately R$11.2 million related to income tax liability and R$0.7 million related to social contribution tax liability, totaling R$11.9 million, and allowed us to compensate the remaining portion.  We appealed this decision, and our request was partially granted.  As of December 31, 2011, we recorded a provision of R$1.1 million as a probable loss.

§In 2006, the Federal Revenue Service concluded that, for the year 2001, we had an income tax liability and social contribution tax liability totaling R$277.0 million (R$379.3 million, as adjusted as of December 31, 2011) and initiated administrative collection proceedings against us.  We filed an administrative objection to this collection proceeding.  Based on the opinion of our legal counsel, the risk of loss is remote with respect to approximately 90.0% of this amount and a possible risk of loss with respect to the remaining 10.0%.
§In 2008, the Federal Revenue Service denied six requests for compensation to offset income tax and social contribution tax liabilities.  We proposed to offset income tax and social contribution tax paid in excess against our tax liability.  The amount involved in these proceedings was R$44.7 million as of December 31, 2011.  Based on the opinion of our internal legal counsel, the risk of loss is possible and no amount was provisioned for this proceeding.
§In November 2004, we filed a writ of mandamus against the municipality of Bragança Paulista regarding the imposition of a new tax for the use of public areas for the installation of water and sewage mains for the provision of public sanitation services.  On February 16, 2005, we were granted a temporary injunction suspending the imposition of this tax and preventing the municipality from collecting any current or future amounts due in respect of this tax until a ruling is rendered by the trial court.  In June 2005, the trial court ruled in our favor by confirming the injunction.  In July 2005, the municipality of Bragança Paulista filed an appeal to the São Paulo appellate court, which was denied.  Although the municipality may take additional judicial steps, it is probable that their attempts will be unsuccessful.
§

We proposed to carry-over losses from the years 1997 and 1998 to offset an income tax liability of approximately R$41 million.  This amount refers to the period between July and September 2002.  The Federal Revenue Service denied the set-off and we appealed this decision.  Based on the opinion of our internal legal counsel, the risk of loss is possible and no amount was partially granted.  We still await a final decision and as of December 31, 2012 we classify the possible loss as R$6.8 million and the probable loss as R$1.2 million.

·In 2006, the Federal Revenue Service concluded that, for 2001, we had an income tax liability and social contribution tax liability totaling R$277.0 million (R$389.5 million, as adjusted as of December 31, 2012) and initiated administrative collection proceedings against us, to which we filed an objection.  We assessed the risk of loss is remote with respect to approximately 90.0% of this amount and a possible risk of loss with respect to the remaining 10.0%.

·In 2008, the Federal Revenue Service denied certain requests for compensation to offset income tax and social contribution tax liabilities.  We proposed to offset overpaid income tax and social contribution tax paid against our tax liability.  The amount involved in these proceedings was R$47.5 million as of December 31, 2012.  We assessed the risk of loss as possible and no amount has been provisioned for this proceeding.

·In 2002, a provisional measure was passed that retroactively required us to make additional tax payments with respect to our 1997 and 1998 fiscal years. In acordance with this provisional mesaure, we made additional tax payments, and, as a result of certain of these payments, we claimed a tax credit with respect to our 2002 fiscal year. Subsequently, the Adminstrative Committee of Tax Resources (Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais) and the Brazilian Tax Authority (FISCO) ruled that this tax credit was not properly taken. We have appealed this decision and the total amount involved is estimated at R$42.4 million as of December 31, 2012. We have assessed the risk of loss as possible.

·On June 23, 2010, we have entered into an settlement with the municipality of São Paulo for public water supply and sewage services.  As part of this settlement, certain tax collections between the parties were settled amicably.  As of December 31, 2012, we classify the probable and possible loss at R$23.9 million and R$39.1 million, respectively.

§On June 23, 2010, we have entered into an agreement with the municipality of São Paulo for public water supply and sewage services. As part of this settlement, certain tax collections between the parties were settled amicably. As of December 31, 2011, the total amount related to tax collection proceedings that remained outstanding from the municipality of São Paulo was R$58.2 million, of which we provisioned R$27.7 million as  a probable loss.

 

We cannot predict the outcome of any of these lawsuits, nor can we assure you that, in the event of an adverse decision, we will be able to pass on to our customers any increase in our deductions from gross revenue, operating expenses or other expenses.  See Item 3.D. Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Business - Any substantial monetary judgment against us in legal proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us.”

Condemnation Proceedings

We are party to a significant number of condemnation proceedings arising from the partial or total expropriation or use of private property for water mains, sewer lines and facilities.  Under Brazilian law, the State or the relevant municipality is entitled to condemn private property to the extent required for the construction, development or improvement of water and sewage systems operated by us.  However,As a result of such proceedings, we are required to provide compensation to affected property owners based upon appraised fair market values.Although we generally provide  While such compensation to property owners on the basis of negotiated settlements,is agreed through negotiations, in other cases we are a party to many lawsuits related to compensation awards.


prosecuted by the property owners.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the future disbursement was estimated at R$448.6 533.7 million, aswith respect to allof which R$ 187.8 million was legal proceedings regarding expropriation and easements.of which R$ 345.9 million was with respect to successfully completed negotiations.  These payments are made over the years, according to each court order or settlement.  After making each payment, we will obtain the title to the respective real property which will be recorded as an asset belonging to us after being expropriated.  We treat such payments as investments for accounting purposes and, as a result, have not provisionedrecorded any amounts with regard to these proceedings.corresponding provision.

Concession-RelatedConcession‑Related Legal Proceedings

In December 1997,The Company is a party to concessions-related proceedings, cases in which it can lose the municipalityright of Santos enacted a statute expropriating ouroperating water and sewage systems located in Santos. We filed a writ of mandamus requesting a temporary injunction against the expropriation, which was denied by the trial court. This decision was subsequently reversed by the appellate court, which then issued a temporary injunction suspending the effectiveness of the statute. By August 2, 2002, both the trial and appellate courts had ruled in our favor, but we are currently waiting for a final decision.

On December 20, 2000, we brought an action against the municipality of Santos for payments due under the concession agreement.  Both parties appealed the decision of the courts of first and second instance, and we are currently awaiting the decision of the higher appeal court. We continue to render watersupply and sewage collection services in few municipalities, including the following:

116


Municipalities in which we are still operating:

a)    the municipality of Santos.

On March 25, 2005,Tarumã filed a writ of prevention against SABESP to cease operations within Tarumã. At that time the injunction was granted to Tarumã; however, we subsequently had the injunction overturned, and have resumed operations within the municipality; b) the municipality of Itapira approvedSantos issued a decree revoking our concession contract. In addition, a municipal law was enacted revoking an earlier law authorizingthat granted the municipality the right to enter into the contract with us. The municipality of Itapira has further filed a repossession lawsuit seeking to repossess all of the reversible assets, rights, and privileges transferred to us in connection withprovide water and sewage collection services in place of us. We filed a lawsuit to overturn this decision and has obtained an injunctionwon, and the ruling was further upheld by the court of appeals. The decision is not yet final (transito em julgado), but the likelihood of loss is remote.

Municipalities in which was later confirmed by an appellate court decision.we are not operating:

a)    the municiapality of Cajobi filed a lawsuit against us requesting reposession of water and sewage services. Cajobi won this case, and currently provides water and sewage services. We have appealed this decisioncase, but we later decidedbelieve the outcome will be unfavorable to waive this appeal andus; b) we filed a compensationlawsuit against the municpality of Álvares Florence requesting the repossession of assets needed to provide water and sewage services, as well as the right to continue operating under our concession agreement. The court’s ruling was unfavorable to us and we have assesed this case as a probable loss; c) we filed a lawsuit against the municipality of Itapira.

The municipalityMacatuba, through an interim injunction, requesting the repossession of Tuiuti has filed a lawsuit seeking to recognize the inexistence of any judicial or legal grounds for usassets needed to provide water and sewage collection services, inas well as the municipality of Tuiuti,right to continue operating under our concession agreement. The injunction was rejected, and to confirm the legality of the expropriation of these services by the municipality.we have not reestablished our services. We filedview this proceeding as an answer to the lawsuit requesting that the trial court (i) confirm the existence of a legal relationship between us and the municipality of Tuiuti; and (ii) award damages for the expropriation of our assets.  The trial court ruled against us but awarded us an indemnity of R$541.0 thousand, to be updated since March 2006.  Both parties appealed this decision, and the court decided partially in our favor increasing the amount related to damages to R$1.1 million.  We are not currently operating in the municipality of Tuiuti.

expected possible loss; d) The municipality of Cajobi hasIperó filed a repossession lawsuit. This lawsuit requests theagainst us requesting repossession of water and sewage collection services dueservices. In response, we filed a lawuit to the termination of the concession agreement on November 13, 2006,maintain possession, which was deemed deemed groundless at trial court and an indemnity for all amounts paid to us for water and sewage collection services after November 2006, as well as payments for the use of all the reversible assets, rights and privileges transferred to us in the concession agreement.  The municipality has been rendering the water and sewage collection services since May 29, 2007, based on a judgment by the court of first instance. The amounts involved in this lawsuit are still being evaluated in the judicial proceedings.appellate court’s decision is pending.

The municipality of Araçoiaba da Serra has filed a repossession lawsuit requesting the repossession of water and sewage collection services dueintangible assets related to the termination of the concession agreement entered into with us and an indemnity for all amounts paidsuch municipalities amount to us for water and sewage collection services after the termination on September 23, 2006, as well as payment for the use of all the reversible assets, rights and privileges transferred to us in the concession agreement.  A temporary injunction was granted by the appellate court in favor of the municipality of Araçoiaba da Serra and confirmed by the superior courts. The first instance court has ruled in favor of the municipality in their requests, to which we filed an appeal currently under the review of the trial court.R$ 16.5 million.

We have filed a lawsuitlawsuits to collect indemnitiesdamages from the municipalities of Diadema e Mauá.  These indemnitiesdamages result from the unilateral termination by these municipalities of the concession contracts entered with us in 1995.  We have invested in the construction of water and sewage collection systems in these municipalities to render the contracted services.  As a result of the termination of these concession agreements, the municipalities started to directly render water and sewage collection servicesservices. We filed judicial claims against municipalities in order to be compensated.

With respect to the collection suitThe proceedings against the municipality of Diadema are as follows:

We are currently discussing an agreement among the municipality of Diadema, or Diadema, Companhia de Saneamento de Diadema – Saned, or Saned, and us, through which we seek to ensure we receive damages owed.Diadema presented a motion to stay execution, but in July of 2008 it was ruled that we could seize money and financial investments from Saned of up to 10% of the value owed to us at the time. On March 3, 2009, R$2.9 million from Saned’s accounts and financial investments were blocked and released to us. Subsequently, the court ruled that the seizure was to be executed through weekly deposits that corresponded to 20% of all of Saned’s accounts receivables and investments. Saned has appealed this decision to the Supreme Court, but the verdict is still pending.

Regarding the motion to stay execution filed by Diadema in October 2009, a verdict was issued that recognized the trialexistence of a loan and its payment, and said that it was to be paid by court order via a payment notice to government. Both we and Diadema have appealed this ruling, as we do not wish to pay through this method.

In September 2011, the superior court ruled in our favor. The municipality appealed fromfavor, affirming the decisionconstitutionality of the municipal law that allows the blocking of ICMS made by the state to the appellatemunicipality so we are able to receive the funds owed to us, instead of having this process completed by a court order. In July 2012, appeals were heard and our appeal was partially upheld. The ruling approved the appellate court decision is still pending.  In December 2008, we entered into a memorandumblocking of understanding withICMS by the Statestate of São Paulo to Diadema. On December 29, 2008, Saned and Diadema signed a letter of intent with the municipalitystate of Diadema and the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Water Resources, formerly known as the State Secretariat for Sanitation and Energy (Secretaria de Saneamento e Energia do Estado de São Paulo).  This memorandum establishes our agreement and us that aimed to conclude negotiationsamicably resolve the conflicts between the parties and settle all outstanding amounts and stayed the collection proceedings we had filed against the municipality of Diadema.  In 2011, the municipality of Diadema agreed withthat would allow us to develop a share infrastructure for the provision ofexclusively provide water and sewage services throughin Diadema. In January 2009, the parties presented a mixed-capital company called Companhia de Água e Esgoto dejoint petition that sought to suspend any new seizures for three months in order to come to an agreement. The suspension was upheld by the treasury court (Juízo da Fazenda Pública) and subsequently renewed, with the last renewal having occurred in March 2012. However, the seizure of ICMS resumed in December 2012. Diadema or CAED. The amount owned to us by that municipality would be returned to us through capital participation in CAED, throughfiled an appeal against the assignmentseizures, and the court upheld this decision. Thus, currently, the seizing of 49.9% sharesICMS has been suspended and is awaiting the verdict of the new companyappeal filed by Diadema. In 2012, we recorded an accounting provision amounting to us.R$60.3 million relating to this proceeding.

117



 

We are concurrently continuing the process of negotiating an agreement with the current administration of Diadema.

The proceeding against the municipality of Mauá is as follows:

With respect to the collection suit against the municipality of Mauá, the trial court ruled in our favor, ordering the municipality to pay us R$153.2 million as compensation for our losses.  The municipality appealed this decision to the appellate court, which upheld the trial court’s decision in August 2008.  The municipality appealed to the Superior Court,superior court, which havehas denied the appeal making the decision in our favor final.  This was a final decision and we took up the execution proceedings in October 2012.  We are currently pursuingwaiting for the Municipality of Maua and SAMA’s summons.

The residual value of the property and equipment related to collect the amount owed.  

We have recordedmunicipality of Maua, reclassified in December 1999 was R$103,8 million and the indemnitiesbalance for damages to be received was R$85,9 million on December 31, 2010.  As decisions were favorable to us we should receive amounts from the municipality through court orders, which will be recognized only when respective payments are completed, regarding uncertainties related to the full payment of Diadema as non-current assets representing long-term receivables.  As of December 31, 2011, this amount totaled R$60.3 million.

Following the expiry of our concession contract withamounts and the municipality of Iperó, the municipality filed a repossession lawsuit requesting the repossessionMaua’s history of assets relating to water and sewage services. In response, we filed a lawsuit on December 30, 2009 to maintain possession or to collect indemnities.  A temporary injunction was granted in our favor on January 5, 2010, but it was thereafter annulled by the court of first instance on January 6, 2010.  We filed an interlocutory appeal, but it was not accepted. Currently, this lawsuit is at the appeals stage with respect to the submissions by both parties. We also filed a precautionary early evidence order in the jurisdiction of the Secretariat of Treasury, which resulted in a summary judgment requiring the early presentation of evidence to establish what assets are related to the provision of the services rendered by us in the municipality of Iperó.

The municipality of Tarumã filed a lawsuit against us in July 2010 requesting an interim injunction requiring (i) the repossession of existing assets necessary for providing water and sewage collection, distribution and treatment services, and (ii) the presentation of documentation demonstrating current income and expenses in the municipality and invoices for services and goods purchased by us to provide services, in order to calculate the indemnity due under article 35, paragraph 4, of the Federal Concessions Law 8,987/95. The lawsuit requested (i) a search warrant if we did not provide the income and expenses information and invoices, (ii) the imposition of a daily fine against us and (iii) that the interim injunction be converted into a permanent order, with the declared assets remaining under the control of the municipality untilputting the payment of court orders in first place.  In December 2011 an accounting provision was registered in the indemnity provided for under article 36total amount of the Federal Concessions Law. The court deniedtotal value of credit retained by the municipality’s requested and we restartedCompany from Mauá; the water distribution and sewage collection services in that area. We awaitlawsuits are still pending a final decision from the court on the matter.  decision.

We filed an ordinary action againstbelieve that the municipality of President Prudente on January 12, 2001, seeking (i) a declaration in respect of its contractualCompany has the legal right to continue to render the services under its concession agreement in the municipality until the formal legal rescission of the concession agreementreceive amounts from damages and (ii) the payment of indemnities. The action also sought a declaration that the acts and threats of the municipality in connection with its planned expropriation were illegal and abusive.  A judgment has been handed down confirming our right to continue to render the services. The decision was appealed, and the decision of the appeal court is still pending. Under an injunction currently in force until an indemnification is paid, we continue to render services inmonitoring the municipality of Presidente Prudente.lawsuits.

In March 2011, we filed a repossession lawsuit against the municipality of Álvares Florence, which terminated our concession contract and took possession of our installations.We requested an interim injunction requiring (i) the repossession of existing assets necessary for providing water and sewage collection, distribution and treatment services, and (ii) the observation of our contractual right to continue to render the services under its concession agreement in the municipality until the formal legal rescission of the concession agreement.  The lawsuit also requested that the interim injunction be converted into a permanent order.  The first instance court has denied our injunction claim, keeping the municipality in charge of the water and sewage collection services.  The court also denied our claim for a permanent order to which we filed an appeal which is currently under the review of the trial court.

In August 2011, we filed a repossession lawsuit against the municipality of Macatuba, which terminated our concession contract and took possession of our sewage collection and water installations.  We requested an interim injunction requiring (i) the repossession of existing assets necessary for providing water and sewage collection, distribution and treatment services, and (ii) the observation of our contractual right to continue to render the services under its concession agreement in the municipality until the formal legal rescission of the concession agreement.The lawsuit also requested that the interim injunction be converted into a permanent order.  The first instance court has denied our injunction claim, keeping the municipality in charge of the water and sewage collection services.  We await the decision of the first instance court on the merits of the claim. 


Tariff-RelatedTariff‑Related Legal Proceedings and Consumer Claims

As of December 31, 2011,2012, approximately 1,5001,560 lawsuits had been brought by our commercial customers that claim that their tariff rates should be equal to those of another category of customers and consequently,440 lawsuits in which the claim is to reduce the sewage treatment tariff due to non provision of services, for which customers seek the reimbursement of the difference between the amounts we collected and those tariffs.  We have obtained final decisions both in favor and against us in many of these lawsuits, and have provisioned R$618.5521.3 million as of December 31, 20112012 for those lawsuits for which we have determined that the risk of loss is probable.

The Association of Distinguished Bars and Restaurants (Associação de Bares e Restaurantes Diferenciados) has initiated several lawsuits to challenge the 10.0% penalty fee we charge on late water and sewage payments. In several of these cases, trial courts have dismissed the lawsuits based on the plaintiffs’ lack of standing to initiate such a lawsuit. In other cases, the lawsuits were dismissed because a civil public action with respect to the same matter was already being heard in the civil courts of the State of São Paulo. In this civil public action, the civil courts ruled against us, and we have appealed the decision and a decision from the appellate court is still pending. Notwithstanding these legal proceedings, we have reduced to 2.0% the penalty fee we charge all of our customers on late bill payments.

Contractors’ Claims

Certain contractors have filed claims against us alleging damages and underpayment of inflation indexation adjustments, monetary losses incurred in connection with introduction of thereal and economic instability of the contract, among other claims.  These suits are being handled by different courts, and we have established provisions for them when the expectation of loss is considered probable.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had recorded a provision of R$420.8115.2 million for claims whose likelihood of loss is considered probable.

Other Legal Proceedings

We are a party to several civil lawsuits related to indemnitiesregarding compensation for property damage, pain and suffering,moral damage and loss of profits allegedly caused to third parties.  In the year ended December 31, 2011, there was an increase bothThese lawsuits are all currently in the number of lawsuits with probabledifferent stages and possible risk of loss, arising from the increase in lawsuits and the review of the expected outcomes, comprising monetary adjustment, interest and fees.will have provisions allocated to them when losses are deemed probable.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had recorded a provision of R$178.4164.5 million, for claims whose likelihood of loss is considered probable.

The São Paulo State Public Attorney’s Office hasCivil Entity Coordination Committee of Piracicaba filed a civil public civil action against us, the National Water Agency and the State of São PauloTreasury Departmentseeking, among other claims for relief: (i) the termination of use of 31 m3/s of water from one of the municipality’s reservoirs; (ii) the creation of a schedule to ensureregulate water supplyuse and withdrawal from the Piracicaba water basin by the Cantareira system to eliminate possible damage to populations downstream and (iii) the development of an environmental impact study on the Cantareira system evaluating the impact of water use and withdrawal on the various basins that constitute the system. This civil public action was decided favorably for us in two lower courts, and the municipalityplaintiff’s appeal to a higher court seeking special and extraordinary recourse was denied based on inadmissibility.   The Civil Entity Coordination Committee of Guarujá is within accepted levels of potabilityPiracicaba has made a subsequent appeal seeking special and in accordance with current legislation; (ii)extraordinary recourse, and we are waiting to require us to start building a water treatment station; (iii) to require us to reimburse fees charged to consumers; and (iv) to require us to pay compensation for physical harm and pain and suffering caused by allegedly improper water consumption.  A temporary injunction was grantedpresent counter-arguments to the São Paulo State Public Attorney’s Office, and we appealed the decision.  Our appeal was rejected by the appellate court.  We have presented an answer to the complaint, and the lawsuit is currentlysame.  The amount involved in the discovery phase.  We have not yet estimated our potential liability with respect to this lawsuit because we currently do not have sufficient information to accurately do so.  We evaluated this proceeding as a possible loss.of December 31, 2012 is R$18.2 billion. We have assessed the risk of loss as remote, and accordingly have not taken any provisions.

On October 29, 2003, the São Paulo StateThe Public Attorney’sProsecutor’s Office on behalf of the people of the State of São Paulo filed a civil public action in a trialagainst SABESP seeking: (i) the nullification of the contract SABESP entered with the Municipality of São Paulo on June 23, 2010 regarding the service of water supply and sewage services; (ii) the exclusion of SABESP fromBM&FBovespa’s CorporateSustainability Index; (iii) sewage treatment coverage of all of the Municipality of São Paulo by 2018.  A court denied the request of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of São Paulo alleging that a transfer to usfor such injunctive relief, which the Public Prosecutor’s Office of ownership of the Alto Tietê System reservoirs from the DAEE would be illegal.  In October 2004, the court of first instance handed down its judgment on the civil public action and declared the agreement between us, DAEE and the State of São Paulo null and void.  This decision was suspended andsubsequently appealed.  We await the results of this appeal.  Separately, we have challenged the amount claimed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State Treasury and DAEE appealed the decision. On August 23, 2010, the appeal was denied.of São Paulo in these proceedings. The amount involved in these proceedings is R$11.7 billion as of December 31, 2012. We have petitioned for clarification of the appeal court’s decision and will seek to take the case to the Supreme Court.  The effects of the appeal court’s decision will be suspended until the end of the legal process.  Our legal counsel has assessed the risk of loss as probable, which would prohibit the transfer of the reservoirs in payment of the accounts receivable due from the State.

We are a party to a substantial number of other legal proceedings, in addition to the lawsuitsremote, and administrative proceedings discussed above, in the ordinary course of our business.  These legal proceedings include personal injury and property damage cases, environmental proceedings, challenges to our ability tocease rendering water and sewage services upon default by our customers and a range of other matters.  Weaccordingly have not established provisions with respect to these other legal proceedings.taken any provisions.


Dividends and Dividend Policy

Amounts Available for Distribution

At each annual shareholders’ meeting, the board of directors is required to recommend the allocation of net profits for the preceding fiscal year.  For purposes of Brazilian Corporate Law, net profits are defined as net income after income tax and social contribution tax for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and any amounts allocated to employees’ and management’s participation in our profits.  In accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law, the amounts available for dividend distribution are the amounts equal to ourhalf of the net profits less any amounts allocated from such net profits to:profit as increased or reduced by:

§118


a)    the amount intended to form the legal reserve; and

§retained earningsb)    the amount intended to form the reserves for investment reserve.contingencies and any written-off amounts of the same reserves formed in previous fiscal years.

We are required to maintain a legal reserve, to which we must allocate 5.0% of net profits for each fiscal year until the amount for such reserve equals 20.0% of our paid-inpaid‑in capital.  However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in respect of any fiscal year in which the aggregate amount of the legal reserve plus our other established capital reserves exceeds 30.0% of our capital.  Net losses, if any, may be offset against the legal reserve.  As of December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 the balance of our legal reserve was R$521.2616.8 million, R$460.0521.2 million and R$378.5460.0 million, respectively, which was equal to 8.4%9.9%, 7.4%8.4% and 6.1%7.4%, respectively, of our capital.

Brazilian Corporate Law also provides for two discretionary allocations of net profits that are subject to approval by the shareholders at each annual shareholders’ meeting.  First, a percentage of net profits may be allocated to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years.  Any amount so allocated in a prior year must be either reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss was anticipated if such loss does not in fact occur, or written off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs.  Second, if the mandatory distributable amount exceeds the sum of realized net profits in any given year, such excess may be allocated to an unrealized revenue reserve.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, realized net profits is defined as the amount of net profits that exceeds the net positive result of equity adjustments and profits or revenues from operations with financial results after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, any company may authorize in its bylaws the creation of a discretionary reserve.  Bylaws which authorize the allocation of a percentage of a company’s net income to the discretionary reserve must also indicate the purpose, criteria for allocation and maximum amount of the reserve.  We may also allocate a portion of our net profits for discretionary allocations for plan expansion and other capital investment projects, the amount of which would be based on a capital budget previously presented by management and approved by our shareholders.  Under Law No. 10,313 of October 3, 2001, capital budgets for more than one year must be revised at each annual shareholders’ meeting.  After completion of the relevant capital projects, we may retain the allocation until the shareholders vote to transfer all or a portion of the reserve to capital or retained earnings.  As of December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 we had an investment reserve of R$3,408.64,690.6 million, R$2,825.03,408.6 million and R$1,732.12,825.0 million, respectively.

The amounts available for distribution may be further increased by a reversion of the contingency reserve for anticipated losses constituted in prior years but not realized.  The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of our individual financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which does not differ from IFRS.GAAP.

The legal reserve is subject to approval by the shareholder vote at our annual shareholders’ meeting and may be transferred to capital but is not available for the payment of dividends in subsequent years.  Our calculation of net profits and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. 

Mandatory Distribution

Brazilian Corporate Law generally requires that the bylaws of each Brazilian corporation specify a minimum percentage of the amounts available for distribution by such corporation for each fiscal year that must be distributed to shareholders as dividends, also known as the mandatory distributable amount.  Under our bylaws, the mandatory distributable amount has been fixed at an amount equal to not less than 25.0% ofthe amounts available for distribution, to the extent amounts are available for distribution at the end of each given fiscal year.


The mandatory distribution is based on a percentage of adjusted net income, not lower than 25.0%, rather than a fixed monetary amount per share.  Brazilian Corporate Law, however, permits a publicly held company, such as us, to suspend the mandatory distribution if the board of directors and the fiscal committee report to the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the company’s financial condition.  The suspension is subject to the approval of holders of common shares.  In this case, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with the CVM.  Profits not distributed by virtue of the suspension mentioned above shall be attributed to a special reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, must be paid as dividends as soon as the financial condition of such company permits such payments.

119


Payment of Dividends

We are required by Brazilian Corporate Law and by our bylaws to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting by the fourth month after the end of each fiscal year at which, among other things, the shareholders have to decide on the payment of an annual dividend when profits were accrued.  The decision to distribute annual dividends is based on the financial statements prepared for the relevant fiscal year.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, dividends generally are required to be paid within 60 days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date for payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared.  A shareholder has a three year period from the dividend payment date to claim dividends (or interest payments on shareholders’ equity as described under “—Record of Dividend Payments and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity”) distributed on his or her shares, after which the amount of the unclaimed dividends reverts to us.  The depositary will set the currency exchange date to be used for payments to ADS holders as soon as practicable upon receipt of those payments from us.

Our bylaws allow us to pay interim dividends from preexisting and accumulated profits related to the current or preceding fiscal year.

In general, shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register with the Central Bank to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil.  The common shares underlying our ADSs are held in Brazil by Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A., as the custodian and agent for the depositary, which is the registered owner of the common shares underlying the ADSs.  Our current registrar is Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A.  The depositary electronically registers the common shares underlying the ADSs with the Central Bank and, therefore, is able to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to these shares eligible to be remitted outside Brazil.  See “Item 10.D. Exchange Controls.”

Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilianreais to the custodian on behalf of the depositary, which will then convert such proceeds into U.S. dollars and will cause such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs.  See “Item 10.D. Additional Information—Exchange Controls.”  Under current Brazilian law, dividends generally paid to shareholders who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, will not be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995.  See “Item 10.E. Taxation.”

Record of Dividend Payments and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity

Brazilian corporations are permitted to distribute dividends in the form of a tax-deductibletax‑deductible notional interest expense on shareholders’ equity in accordance with Law No. 9,249 of December 26, 1995, as amended.  The rate at which tax-deductibleamount of tax‑deductible interest that may be paid is limited tocalculated by applying the productdailypro rata variation of the average TJLP andgovernment’s long-term interest rate (TJLP) on the shareholders’ equity during the relevant period and cannot exceed the greater of:

·        50.0% of net income (before taking into account such distribution and any deductions for income taxes and after taking into account any deductions for social contributions on net profits) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or

§50.0% of net income (before taking into account such distribution and any deductions for income taxes and after taking into account any deductions for social contributions on net profits) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or
§

·50.0% of earnings reserves and retained earnings.

Any payment of interest on shareholders’ equity to holders of ADSs or common shares, whether or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15.0% or 25.0% if the beneficiary is resident in a low tax haven.jurisdiction (tax haven).  See “Item 10.E. Taxation.”  The amount paid to shareholders asinterestas interest on shareholders’ equity, net of any withholding tax, may be included as part of anythe mandatory dividends distributable amount.  amount as prescribed in Brazilian Corporate Law.


Dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity over the minimum established in a company’s bylaws are recognized when approved by the shareholders in the general meeting.  Consequently, the amounts recognized as of December 31, 2011,2012 correspond to the minimum established by law of 25.0% of the net profitincome and the difference was recorded onApril 23, 2012on April 22, 2013 totaling R$ 578.7534.3 million.

120


Distributions of dividends

The following table sets forth the distributions of dividends that we made to our shareholders in respect of our 2009,2012, 2011 and 2010 and 2011 earnings.  All these amounts distributed or to be distributed were or will be in the form of interest on shareholders’ equity.

Year ended December 31,

Aggregate amount distributed

Payment Dates

Payment per share

Payment per ADS

Aggregate amount distributed

Payment Dates

Payment per share

Payment per ADS

(in millions ofreais

 

(inreais

(in millions ofreais

 

(inreais

 

2009

394.2

June 28, 2010

1.73

3.46

2012

534.3

(**)

0.78

2011

578.7

June 22, 2012

0.85

2010

456.0(*)

June 28, 2011

2.00

4.00

456.0(*)

June 28, 2011

0.67

2011

578.7(**)

(**)

2.54

5.08

___________

______________

(*)   We recorded dividends in the amount of R$387.2 million, which pursuant to our bylaws is our minimum dividend amount.

(**) We recorded dividends in the amount of R$290.6454.1 million, which pursuant to our bylaws is our minimum dividend amount. The dividends will be paid until 60 days after the Ordinary General Meeting, which occurred on April 23, 2012.22, 2013.

Dividend Policy

We intend to declare and pay dividends and/or interest on shareholders’ equity, as required by Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws.  Our board of directors may approve the distribution of interest on shareholders’ equity, calculated based on our semiannual or quarterly financial statements.  The declaration of dividends is annual, including dividends in excess of the mandatory distribution, and requires approval by the vote of the majority of the holders of our common shares.  The amount of any distributions will depend on many factors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors and shareholders.  Within the context of our tax planning, we may in the future continue to determine that it is in our best interest to distribute interest on shareholders’ equity.

B.Significant Changes

We are not aware of anyOther than as disclosed in this annual report, no significant changes bearing upon our financial conditionchange has occurred since the date of the audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING

A.Offer and Listing Details

Market Price of Common Shares

Our common shares have been listed on the BM&FBOVESPA under the symbol “SBSP3” since June 4, 1997 and, starting on April 24, 2002, have been included in theNovo Mercado segment of that exchange.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had 2,7674,606 registered holders of common shares.

On April 30, 2007, our shareholders approved a reverse stock split of 125 common shares into one common share.  Following a ratio change effected on January 24, 2013, each American Depositary Share currently represents one of our common shares.  On April 22, 2013 our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares.  IFRS requires the retroactive restatement of earnings-per-shareearnings‑per‑share computations for stock dividends, stock splits, and reverse splits.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing sale prices inreais for common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA.  The table also sets forth prices per ADS assuming that ADSs had been outstanding on all such dates and translated into U.S. dollars at the commercial market rate for the sale ofU.S. dollars for each of the respective dates of such quotations.  In addition, the table sets forth the average daily trading volume for our common shares.

121



Reais per common share

U.S. dollar equivalent per ADS (1)

Average daily trading volume

Reais per common share

U.S. dollar equivalent per ADS(1)

 

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Average daily trading volume

2008

18.11

46.50

16.08

56.02

384,463

2009

21.87

37.19

18.39

43.66

351,874

2013

 

January

85.00

92.31

41.90

45.09

542,029

February

90.55

95.97

45.63

48.58

570,089

March

88.70

96.40

44.64

47.87

561,510

April(2)

27.85

31.38

13.93

15.66

972,318

May (through May 8, 2013)

27.05

28.54

13.45

14.20

2,228.5

2012

50.42

92.48

53.97

91.52

409,457

First quarter

50.42

69.66

53.97

76.46

372,200

Second quarter

68.50

77.32

74.85

74.48

321,627

Third quarter

75.67

92.48

74.51

91.52

417,208

Fourth quarter

80.54

90.50

76.98

89.40

534,115

2011

39.00

52.78

48.75

56.80

258,827

First quarter

21.87

28.86

18.39

24.77

360,725

40.10

47.00

47.91

57.71

282,548

Second quarter

25.10

32.25

22.56

32.02

334,721

45.00

49.50

56.39

60.75

267,042

Third quarter

27.50

35.38

29.07

39.18

397,366

39.00

48.03

48.75

61.43

245,275

Fourth quarter

31.15

37.19

35.79

43.66

306,677

43.03

52.78

45.75

56.80

241,197

2010

30.27

44.47

32.70

52.56

311,996

30.27

44.47

32.70

52.56

311,996

First quarter

30.27

34.26

32.70

39.55

323,739

30.27

34.26

32.70

39.55

323,739

Second quarter

32.36

37.50

35.28

41.63

416,256

32.36

37.50

35.28

41.63

416,256

Third quarter

33.41

37.90

38.05

44.74

265,725

33.41

37.90

38.05

44.74

265,725

Fourth quarter

37.59

44.47

44.53

52.56

242,943

37.59

44.47

44.53

52.56

242,943

2011

39.00

52.78

48.75

56.80

258,827

2009

21.87

37.19

18.39

43.66

351,874

First quarter

40.10

47.00

47.91

57.71

282,548

21.87

28.86

18.39

24.77

360,725

Second quarter

45.00

49.50

56.39

60.75

267,042

25.10

32.25

22.56

32.02

334,721

Third quarter

39.00

48.03

48.75

61.43

245,275

27.50

35.38

29.07

39.18

397,366

Fourth quarter

43.03

52.78

45.75

56.80

241,197

31.15

37.19

35.79

43.66

306,677

2012

 

 

 

 

January

50.42

58.34

53.97

67.09

349,214

February

58.00

64.85

66.95

75.88

495,100

March

65.00

69.66

75.79

76.46

288,000

April (through April 23, 2012)

65.50

73.65

74.85

80.43

332,131

 

 

 

 

2008

18.11

46.50

16.08

56.02

384,463

___________________

______________

(1)   EachFollowing a ratio change effected on January 24, 2013, each ADS is equal 2represents one common sharesshares.

 (2)  After April 22, 2013 our common shares are traded considering the stock split.

Market Price of ADSs

Our ADSs, each of which represent tworepresents one of our common shares, as of the date of this annual report, are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SBS.”  Prior to June 8, 2007, each ADS represented 250 of our common shares.  From that date through January 23, 2013, each ADS represented two of our common shares.  Following a ratio change effected on January 24, 2013, each American Depositary Share currently represents one of our common shares.  On April 22, 2013 our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares.  Our ADSs began trading on the NYSE on May 10, 2002 in connection with the initial offering of our equity securities in the United States.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing prices for our ADSs on the NYSE.

Price in U.S. dollars per ADS

Price in U.S. dollars per ADS

 

Low

High

Average daily trading volume

Low

High

Average daily trading volume

2006

17.21

35.35

321,105

2007

29.15

53.57

323,404

2008

16.76

56.35

414,961

2009

18.03

43.40

331,673

2013

 

January(1)

41.60

45.41

395,050

February

45.27

48.37

484,813

March

44.44

48.63

595,193

April(2)

14.02

15.88

639,891

May(2) (through May 8, 2013)

13.68

14.31

1,385,549

2012

56.62

91.48

311,242

First quarter

56.62

76.86

325,938

Second quarter

68.90

80.18

328,410

Third quarter

74.49

91.48

316,824

Fourth quarter

78.16

88.35

321,333

2011

46.35

62.63

263,370

First quarter

18.03

25.12

382,314

48.60

58.74

297,927

Second quarter

22.74

32.27

358,534

56.91

62.63

284,122

Third quarter

27.74

39.51

296,588

46.35

62.07

263,200

Fourth quarter

36.58

43.40

292,049

46.74

56.66

215,152

2010

33.09

53.18

275,432

33.09

53.18

275,432

First quarter

33.09

40.16

262,525

33.09

40.16

262,525

Second quarter

35.33

41.54

337,808

35.33

41.54

337,808

Third quarter

37.97

45.51

266,393

37.97

45.51

266,393

Fourth quarter

45.15

53.18

234,667

45.15

53.18

234,667

2011

46.35

63.63

263,370

2009

18.03

43.40

331,673

First quarter

48.60

58.74

297,927

18.03

25.12

382,314

Second quarter

56.91

62.63

284,122

22.74

32.27

358,534

Third quarter

46.35

62.07

263,200

27.74

39.51

296,588

Fourth quarter

46.74

56.66

215,152

36.58

43.40

292,049

2012

 

 

January

56.62

66.91

279,963

February

67.43

75.12

443,328

March

73.23

76.86

278,767

April (through April 23, 2012)

74.11

80.18

276,903

 

 

2008

16.76

56.35

414,961

2007

29.15

53.57

323,404

2006

17.21

35.35

321,105

______________

(1)   After January 23, 2013 our common shares have traded considering the ratio change.  On April 22, 2013 our shareholders approved a stock split, following which each common share represented three new common shares.

(2)   After April 29, 2013 our ADSs are traded considering the stock split.

122



 

B.Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

C.    Markets

Markets 

Trading on the Brazilian Stock Exchanges

The BM&FBOVESPA stock and futures exchange is a corporation where all stock and futures trades in Brazil are carried out, with the exception of public-debtpublic‑debt bonds, which are traded electronically, and the privatization auctions, which are run by the Rio de Janeiro Stock Exchange.

Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA is limited to brokerage firms and is conducted between 10:00 a.m. and 5:0030 p.m., or between 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. during daylight savings time in Brazil.  The BM&FBOVESPA also permits trading from 5:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., or between 6:4505 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. during daylight savings time in Brazil,, during a different trading period of time, called the “after market.”  Trading on the after marketaftermarket is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility and on the volume of shares transacted through Internet brokers.

In order to maintain better quality control over the fluctuation of its index, BM&FBOVESPA has adopted a “circuit breaker” system pursuant to which trading sessions are suspended for a period of 30 minutes or an hour whenever the BM&FBOVESPA index falls below the limits of 10.0% or 15.0%, respectively, in relation to theindex at the closing of the previous trading session.  Additionally, BM&FBOVESPA has also implemented an intraday variation limit, which prevents the closing of a transaction related to a security if the difference between the consideration paid for such security and its price at the closing of the previous trading session is greater than 10.0%.

123


BM&FBOVESPA settles the sale of shares three business days after they have taken place, without monetary adjustment of the purchase price.  The shares are paid for and delivered through a settlement agent affiliated with the BM&FBOVESPA.  The BM&FBOVESPA performs multilateral compensation for both the financial obligations and the delivery of shares.  According to the BM&FBOVESPA’s regulations, financial settlement is carried out by the Central Bank’s reserve transfer system.  The securities are transferred by the BM&FBOVESPA’s custody system.  Both delivery and payment are final and irrevocable.

Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA is significantly less liquid than trading on the NYSE or other major exchanges in the world.  Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on the BM&FBOVESPA, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by a controlling group or by government entities.  As of the end of 2011,2012, the BM&FBOVESPA had a total market capitalization of approximately US$1.2 billion (R$2.3 billion)(R$2.5 billion) and an average daily trading volume of US$3.9 3.7 billion (R$6.27.3 billion).  The top ten stocks in terms of 20112012 trading volume accounted for approximately 47.2%43.0% of all shares traded on the BM&FBOVESPA as of December 31, 2011.2012.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we accounted for approximately 0.5%0.8% of the market capitalization of all listed companies on BM&FBOVESPA.

Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or a “non-Brazilian“non‑Brazilian holder,” is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment regulations.  With limited exceptions, non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holders may trade on Brazilian stock exchanges in accordance with the requirements of CMN Resolution No. 2,689, which requires that securities held by non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holders be maintained in the custody of financial institutions authorized by the Central Bank and by the CVM or in deposit accounts with financial institutions.  In addition, Resolution No. 2,689 requires non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holders to restrict their securities trading to transactions on the BM&FBOVESPA or qualified over-the-counterover‑the‑counter markets.  With limited exceptions, non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holders may not transfer the ownership of investments made under Resolution No. 2,689 to other non‑Brazilian holders through a private transaction.  See “Item 10.E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for a description of certain tax benefits extended to non‑Brazilian holders who qualify under Resolution No. 2,689.

TheNovo Mercado Segment

Since April 24, 2002, our common shares have been listed on theNovo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA.  TheNovo Mercado is a listing segment designed for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to abide by some additional corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those already required under Brazilian law.  A company in theNovo Mercado must follow good practices of corporate governance.  These rules generally increase shareholders’rights and enhance the quality of information provided to shareholders.  On April 18, 2002, and on June 19, 2006, and April 23, 2012, our shareholders approved changes to our bylaws to comply with theNovo Mercado requirements.  In addition, theNovo Mercado provides for the creation of a Market Arbitration Chamber for conflict resolution between investors and companies listed in theNovo Mercado


In addition to the obligations imposed by current Brazilian law, a company listed on theNovo Mercado is obligated to:

§maintain only voting shares;
§hold public offerings of shares in a manner favoring diversification of the company’s shareholder base and broader access to retail investors;
§maintain a minimum free float of at least 25.0% of the outstanding capital stock of the company;
§grant tag along rights for all shareholders in connection with a transfer of control of the company;
§limit the term of all members of the board of directors to two years;
§ensure that at least 20.0% of the members of the board of directors are independent, as defined under the Novo Mercado regulation;
§prepare annual, including cash flow statements, in compliance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS or reconciled from Brazilian GAAP to U.S. GAAP or IFRS;
§disclose information on a quarterly basis, including share ownership of certain of our employees and directors and amount of free float of shares;
§hold a tender offer by the company’s controlling shareholder (the minimum price of the shares to be offered will be determined by an appraisal process) if it elects to delist from the Novo Mercado; and
§

·maintain only voting shares;

·hold public offerings of shares in a manner favoring diversification of the company’s shareholder base and broader access to retail investors;

·maintain a minimum free float of at least 25.0% of the outstanding capital stock of the company;

·grant tag along rights for all shareholders in connection with a transfer of control of the company;

124


·limit the term of all members of the board of directors to two years;

·ensure that at least 20.0% of the members of the board of directors are independent, as defined under theNovo Mercado regulation;

·prepare annual financial statements, including cash flow statements, in compliance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS or reconciled from Brazilian GAAP to U.S. GAAP or IFRS;

·disclose information on a quarterly basis, including share ownership of certain of our employees and directors and amount of free float of shares;

·hold a tender offer by the company’s controlling shareholder (the minimum price of the shares to be offered will be determined by an appraisal process) if it elects to delist from theNovo Mercado; and

·make greater disclosure of related party transactions.

On May 10, 2011, theNovo Mercado rules were revised and currently establish the following additional obligations:

§

·the chairman of the board of directors is prohibited from simultaneously holding the position of chief executive officer;

§the board of directors must disclose its opinion on take over proposals within 15 days from the presentation of the proposal; and
§the company must have a securities purchase policy and a code of ethics.

·the board of directors must disclose its opinion on takeover proposals within 15 days from the presentation of the proposal; and

·the company must have a securities purchase policy and a code of ethics.

Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets

The Brazilian securities markets are principally governed by Law No. 6,385 of December 7, 1976, and Brazilian Corporate Law, each as amended and supplemented, and by regulations issued by the CVM, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and securities markets generally, by the CMN, and by the Central Bank, which has licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions.  These laws and regulations, among others, provide for disclosure requirements applicable to issuers of traded securities, protection of minority shareholders and criminal penalties for insider trading and price manipulation.  They also provide for licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and governance of the Brazilian stock exchanges.  Nevertheless, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, a company is either public (companhia aberta), such as we are, or closely held (companhia fechada).  All public companies, including us, are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting requirements.  A company registered with the CVM may have its securities traded on the Brazilian stock exchanges or in the Brazilian over‑the‑counter market.  Our common shares are listed and traded on the BM&FBOVESPA and may be traded privately subject to some limitations.


To be listed on a Brazilian stock exchange a company must apply for registration with the CVM and the stock exchange where the head office of the company is located.

We have the option to ask that trading in our securities on the BM&FBOVESPA be suspended in anticipation of a material announcement.  Trading may also be suspended on the initiative of the BM&FBOVESPA or the CVM, among other reasons, based on or due to a belief that a company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to the inquiries by the CVM or the São Paulo Stock Exchange.

The Brazilian over-the-counterover‑the‑counter market consists of direct trades between individuals in which a financial institution registered with the CVM serves as intermediary.  No special application, other than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market.  The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilian over-the-counterover‑the‑counter market by the respective intermediaries.

125


Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA by non-residentsnon‑residents of Brazil is subject to limitations under Brazilian foreign investment and tax legislation.  The Brazilian custodian for our common shares underlying the ADSs must, on behalf of the depositary for our ADSs, obtain registration from the Central Bank to remit U.S. dollars abroad for payments of dividends, any other cash distributions, or upon the disposition of the shares and sales proceeds thereto.  In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges ADSs for common shares, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s registration for five business days after the exchange.  Thereafter, the holder may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of our common shares, or distributions relating to our common shares, unless the holder obtains a new registration.  See “Item 10.D. Exchange Controls.”

D.Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

E.    Dilution

Dilution 

Not applicable.

F.Expenses of the Issue

Not applicable.

ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.Share Capital

Not applicable.

B.Memorandum and Articles of Association

The following is a summary of the material terms of our common shares, including related provisions of our bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law.  This description is qualified by reference to our bylaws and to Brazilian law.

Corporate Purposes

We are a mixed capital company (sociedade de economia mista) of unlimited duration, incorporated on September 6, 1973, with limited liability, duly organized and operating under Brazilian Corporate Law.  As set forth in Article 2 of our bylaws, our corporate purpose is to render basic sanitation services, aimed at the universalization of basic sanitation in the State of São Paulo without harming our long-termlong‑term financial sustainability.  Our activities comprise water supply, sanitary sewage services, urban rainwater management and drainage services, urban cleaning services, solid waste management services and related activities, including the planning, operation, maintenance and commercialization of energy, and the commercialization of services, products, benefits and rights that directly or indirectly arise from itsour assets, operations and activities.  We are allowed to act, in a subsidiary form, in other Brazilian locations and abroad.

Directors’ Powers

Although our bylaws contain no specific provisions regarding a director or executive officer’s power to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which that director has a material interest, under Brazilian Corporate Law, a director or an executive officer is prohibited from voting in any meeting or with respect to any transaction in which that director or executive officer has a conflict of interest with the company andmust disclose the nature and extent of the conflicting interest to be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.  In any case, a director or an executive officer may not transact any business with the company, including any borrowing, except on reasonable or fair terms and conditions that are identical to the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties.


Under our bylaws, our shareholders are responsible for establishing the compensation we pay to the members of our board of directors, members of the fiscal committee and the executive officers.

126


Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, each member of our board of directorsexecutive officers must be a resident ofin Brazil.  Our bylaws do not establish any mandatory retirement age limit.

See also “Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management.”

Description of Common Shares

General

Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at our annual or special shareholders’ meetings.  Brazilian Corporate Law requires that all our shareholders’ meetings be called by publication of a notice in theDiário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, the official government publication of the State of São Paulo, and in a newspaper of general circulation in our principal place of business, currently the city of São Paulo, at least fifteen days prior to the meeting.  In addition, the CVM may also require the first call for a shareholders’ meeting to be up to 30 days before such shareholders’ meeting.  The quorum to hold shareholders’ meetings on first call requires the attendance of shareholders, either in person or by proxy, representing at least 25.0% of the shares entitled to vote and, on second call, the meetings can be held with the attendance of shareholders, also either in person or by proxy, representing any number of shares entitled to vote.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, our common shares are entitled to dividends or other distributions made in respect of our common shares in proportion to their share of the amount available for the dividend or distribution.  See “Item 8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy” for a more complete description of payment of dividends and other distributions on our common shares.  In addition, upon any liquidation of our Company, our common shares are entitled to our remaining capital after paying our creditors in proportion to their ownership interest in us.

In principle, a change in shareholder rights, such as the reduction of the compulsory minimum dividend, is subject to a favorable vote of the shareholders representing at least one half of our voting shares.  Under some circumstances that may result in a change in the shareholder rights, such as the creation of preferred shares, Brazilian Corporate Law requires the approval of a majority of the shareholders who would be adversely affected by the change attending a special meeting called for such reason.  It should be emphasized, however, that our by-lawsby‑laws expressly prevents us from issuing preferred shares.  Brazilian Corporate Law specifies other circumstances where a dissenting shareholder may also have appraisal rights.

According to Brazilian Corporate Law, neither a company’s bylaws nor actions taken at a general meeting of shareholders may deprive a shareholder of certain rights, such as:

§

·the right to participate in the distribution of profits;

·the right to participate equally and ratably in any remaining residual assets in the event of liquidation of the company;

·the right to supervise the management of the corporate business as specified in Brazilian Corporate Law;

·the right to preemptive rights in the event of a subscription of shares, debentures convertible into shares or subscription bonuses (except in some specific circumstances under Brazilian law); and

·the right to withdraw from the company in the cases specified in Brazilian Corporate Law.

§the right to participate equally and ratably in any remaining residual assets in the event of liquidation of the company;
§the right to supervise the management of the corporate business as specified in Brazilian Corporate Law;
§the right to preemptive rights in the event of a subscription of shares, debentures convertible into shares or subscription bonuses  (except in some specific circumstances under Brazilian law); and
§the right to withdraw from the company in the cases specified in Brazilian Corporate Law.

Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws, each of our common shares carries the right to one vote at our shareholders’ meetings.  We may not restrain or deny that right without the consent of the holders of a majority of the shares affected.


Neither Brazilian Corporate Law nor our bylaws expressly addresses:

§staggered terms for directors;
§cumulative voting, except as described below; or
§measures that could prevent a takeover attempt.

·staggered terms for directors;

·cumulative voting, except as described below; or

 

127


·measures that could prevent a takeover attempt.

However, under the laws of the State of São Paulo, the State is required to own at least a majority of our outstanding common shares.

According to Brazilian Corporate Law and its regulations, shareholders representing at least five per cent of our capital, may request that a multiple voting procedure be adopted to entitle each share to as many votes as there are board members and to give each shareholder the right to vote cumulatively for only one candidate or to distribute their votes among several candidates.  Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholder action must be taken at a shareholders meeting, duly called for and not by written consent.

In addition, shareholders owning at least 15.0% of the capital may request the right to elect, separately a member of the Board of Directors.

Preemptive Rights

Each of our shareholders has a general preemptive right to subscribe for shares or securities convertible into shares in any capital increase, in proportion to his or her ownership interest in us, except in the event of the grant and exercise of any option to acquire shares of our capital stock.  The preemptive rights are valid for a 30‑day period from the publication of the announcement of the capital increase.  Shareholders are also entitled to sell this preemptive right to third parties.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, we may amend our bylaws to eliminate preemptive rights or to reduce the exercise period in connection with a public offering of shares or an exchange offer made to acquire another company.  Currently, our bylaws provide our shareholders with preemptive rights with respect to any offering.

In the event of a capital increase by means of the issuance of new shares, holders of ADSs, or of common shares, would, except under circumstances described above, have preemptive rights to subscribe for any class of our newly issued shares.  However, an ADS holder may not be able to exercise the preemptive rights relating to the common shares underlying his or her ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and ADSs - A holder of our common shares and ADSs might be unable to exercise preemptive rights and tag-alongtag‑along rights with respect to the common shares.”

Redemption and Rights of Withdrawal

Brazilian Corporate Law provides that, under limited circumstances, a shareholder has the right to withdraw his or her equity interest from the company and to receive payment for the portion of shareholder’s equity attributable to his or her equity interest.  This right of withdrawal may be exercised by dissenting our shareholders in the event that at least half of all voting shares outstanding authorize us:

§to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
§to merge into another company or to consolidate with another company, subject to the conditions set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law;
§to participate in a centralized group of companies, as defined under Brazilian Corporate Law and subject to the conditions set forth therein;
§to change our corporate purpose;
§to split up, subject to the conditions set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law;
§to transform into another type of company;
§to transfer all of our shares to another company or to receive shares of another company in order to make the company whose shares are transferred a wholly owned subsidiary of such company, known asincorporação de ações; or

·to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;

·to merge into another company or to consolidate with another company, subject to the conditions set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law;

·to participate in a centralized group of companies, as defined under Brazilian Corporate Law and subject to the conditions set forth therein;

·to change our corporate purpose;

·to split up, subject to the conditions set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law;

·to transform into another type of company;

·to transfer all of our shares to another company or to receive shares of another company in order to make the company whose shares are transferred a wholly owned subsidiary of such company, known asincorporação de ações; or

 

128



 

§·        to acquire control of another company at a price which exceeds the limits set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law.

The right of withdrawal lapses 30 days after publication of the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting that approved a corporate action described above.  We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to withdrawal rights within 10 days following the expiration of such rights if the withdrawal of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize our financial condition.  Brazilian Corporate Law allows companies to redeem their shares at their economic value, subject to the provisions of their bylaws and certain other requirements.  Our bylaws currently do not provide that our capital stock will be redeemable at its economic value and, consequently, any redemption pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law would be made based on the book value per share, determined on the basis of the last balance sheet approved by the shareholders.  However, if a shareholders’ meeting giving rise to redemption rights occurred more than 60 days after the date of the last approved balance sheet, a shareholder would be entitled to demand that his or her shares be valued on the basis of a new balance sheet dated within 60 days of such shareholders’ meeting.

In addition, the rights of withdrawal in the third, fourth and eighth bullet points above may not be exercised by holders of shares if such shares (i) are liquid, defined as being part of the BM&FBOVESPA index or other stock exchange index (as defined by the CVM), and (ii) are widely held, such that the controlling shareholder or companies it controls have less than 50.0% of our shares.  Our common shares are included on the BM&FBOVESPA index.

This right of withdrawal may also be exercised in the event that the entity resulting from a stock merger incorporação de ações, as described above, consolidation or spin‑off of a listed company fails to become a listed company within 120 days of the shareholders’ meeting at which such transaction was approved.

We may cancel the right of withdrawal if the payment amount has a material adverse effect on our finances.

Conversion Right

Not applicable because our capital stock is only comprised of common shares.

EspecialSpecial and General Meetings

Unlike the laws governing corporations incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, the Brazilian corporationcorporate law does not allow shareholders to approve matters by written consent obtained as a response to a consent solicitation procedure.  All matters subject to approval by the shareholders must be approved in a general meeting, duly convened pursuant to the provisions of Brazilian corporationcorporate law.  Shareholders may be represented at a shareholders’ meeting by attorneys-in-factattorneys‑in‑fact who are (i) shareholders of the corporation, (ii) a Brazilian attorney, (iii) a member of management or (iv) a financial institution.

General shareholders’ meetings may be called by publication of a notice in theDiário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo and in a newspaper of general circulation in our principal place of business at least 15 days prior to the meeting.  Special meetings are convened in the same manner as general shareholders’ meetings and may occur immediately before or after a general meeting.

At duly called and convened meetings, our shareholders are empowered to take any action regarding our business.  Shareholders have the exclusive right, during our annual shareholders’ meetings required to be hold within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year, to approve our financial statements and to determine the allocation of our net income and the distribution of dividends related to the fiscal year immediately preceding the meeting.  The members of our board of directors are generally elected at annual shareholders’ meetings.  However, according to Brazilian corporationcorporate law, they can also be elected at extraordinary shareholders’ meetings.  At the request of shareholders holding a sufficient number of shares, a fiscal committee can be established and its members elected at any shareholders’ meeting.

A special shareholders’ meeting may be held concurrently with the annual shareholders’ meeting and at other times during the year.  Our shareholders may take the following actions, among others, exclusively at shareholders’ meetings:

§129


·        election and dismissal of the members of our board of directors and our fiscal committee, if the shareholders have requested the set upsetup of the latter;


·approval of the aggregate compensation of the members of our board of directors and board of executive officers, as well as the compensation of the members of the fiscal committee, if one has been established;

§approval of the aggregate compensation of the members of our board of directors and board of executive officers, as well as the compensation of the members of the fiscal committee, if one has been established;

·amendment of our bylaws;

·approval of our merger, consolidation or spin‑off;

·approval of our dissolution or liquidation, as well as the election and dismissal of liquidators and the approval of their accounts;

·granting stock awards and approval of stock splits or reverse stock splits;

·approval of stock option plans for our management and employees, as well as for the management and employees of other companies directly or indirectly controlled by us;

·approval, in accordance with the proposal submitted by our board of directors, of the distribution of our net income and payment of dividends;

·authorization to delist from theNovo Mercado and to become a private company, except if the cancellation is due to a breach of theNovo Mercado regulations by management, and to retain a specialized firm to prepare a valuation report with respect to the value of our shares, in any such events;

·approval of our management accounts and our financial statements;

·approval of any primary public offering of our shares or securities convertible into our shares; and

·deliberate upon any matter submitted by the board of directors.

§amendment of our bylaws;
§approval of our merger, consolidation or spin-off;
§approval of our dissolution or liquidation, as well as the election and dismissal of liquidators and the approval of their accounts;
§granting stock awards and approval of stock splits or reverse stock splits;
§approval of stock option plans for our management and employees, as well as for the management and employees of other companies directly or indirectly controlled by us;
§approval, in accordance with the proposal submitted by our board of directors, of the distribution of our net income and payment of dividends;
§authorization to delist from the Level 2 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices and to become a private company, except if the cancellation is due to a breach of the Level 2 regulations by management, and to retain a specialized firm to prepare a valuation report with respect to the value of our shares, in any such events;
§approval of our management accounts and our financial statements;
§approval of any primary public offering of our shares or securities convertible into our shares; and
§deliberate upon any matter submitted by the board of directors.

Limitations on Rights to Own Securities

There are no limitations under Brazilian law and our bylaws on the rights of non-residentsnon‑residents or foreign shareholders to own securities, including the rights of such non-residentnon‑resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights.

Anti-TakeoverEqual Treatment Provisions

Pursuant to article 40 of our bylaws and theNovo Mercado regulations, any party that acquires our control must extend a tender offer for the shares held by non-controllingnon‑controlling shareholders at the same conditions and purchase price paid to the controlling shareholder.  In addition, State Law No. 119/73, which created our Company, requires the State to hold the majority of our shares at all times.

Reserves

General

The Brazilian Corporate Law provides that all discretionary allocations of “adjusted income” are subject to shareholder approval and may be added to capital or distributed as dividends in subsequent years.  In the case of our capital reserve and the legal reserve, they are also subject to shareholder approval; however, the use of their respective balances is restricted to being added to capital or absorbed by losses.  They cannot be used as a source for income distribution to shareholders.

Capital Reserve

Our capital reserve is comprised of tax incentives and donations from government agencies and private entities received through December 31, 2007.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had a capital reserve of R$124.3 million.

130


Investment Reserve

Our investment reserve is comprised specifically of internal funds for expansion of water and sewage service systems.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, we had an investment reserve of R$3,408.64,690.6 million.

Legal Reserve


Under Brazilian Corporate Law, we are required to record a legal reserve to which we must allocate 5% of the adjusted net income each year until the amount of the reserve equals 20.0% of paid-inpaid‑in capital.  Any accumulated deficit may be charged against the legal reserve.  As of December 31, 2011,2012, the balance of our legal reserve was R$521.2616.8 million.

Arbitration

In connection with our listing with theNovo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA, we, our shareholders, directors and officers have undertaken to refer to arbitration any and all disputes or controversies arising out of theNovo Mercado rules or any other corporate matters.  See “Item 9.C. Markets.”  Under our bylaws, any dispute among us, our shareholders and our management with respect to the application ofNovo Mercado rules, Brazilian Corporate Law, the application of the rules and regulations regarding Brazilian capital markets, will be resolved by arbitration conducted pursuant to the BM&FBOVESPA Arbitration Rules in the Market Arbitration Chamber.  Any dispute among shareholders, including holders of ADSs, and any dispute between us and shareholders, including holders of ADSs, will also be submitted to arbitration.

Options

There are currently no outstanding options to purchase any of our common shares.

C.Material Contracts

For a description of the material contracts entered into by the State and us, see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Transactions with the State of São Paulo—Agreements with the State.”

D.Exchange Controls

The right to convert dividend or interest payments and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investments have been registered with the Central Bank and the CVM.  Such restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad may hinder or prevent the custodian for our common shares represented by our ADSs or the holders of our common shares from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of these shares into U.S. dollars and remitting the U.S. dollars abroad.  Holders of our ADSs could be adversely affected by delays in, or refusal to grant any, required government approval to convert Brazilian currency payments on the common shares underlying our ADS and to remit the proceeds abroad.

Resolution No. 1,927 of the CMN provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers.  The ADS program was approved under the Annex V Regulations by the Central Bank and the CVM prior to the issuance of the ADSs.  Accordingly, the proceeds from the sale of ADSs by ADR holders outside Brazil are not subject to Brazilian foreign investment controls, and holders of the ADSs are entitled to favorable tax treatment under certain circumstances.  See “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and ADSs—Investors who exchange ADSs for common shares may lose their ability to remit foreign currency abroad and to obtain Brazilian tax advantages” and “Item 10.E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

E.    Taxation

Taxation 

This summary contains a description of certain Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs by a holder.

131


The summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and the federal income tax laws of the United States as in effect on the date of this annual report, which laws are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, regarding the U.S. federal income tax, and to differing interpretations.  Holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the Brazilian, U.S. or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any non-Brazilian, non-U.S.non‑Brazilian, non‑U.S., state or local tax laws.

Although there presently is no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions in the past regarding such a treaty.  No assurance can be given, however, as to if or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders of common shares or ADSs.


Brazilian Tax Considerations

The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation (a “non‑Brazilian holder”).  It is based on Brazilian laws and regulations as currently in effect, and, therefore, any change in such law may change the consequences described below.  Each non‑Brazilian holder should consult his or her own tax adviser concerning the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in common shares or ADSs.

A non‑Brazilian holder of ADSs may withdraw them in exchange for common shares in Brazil.  Pursuant to Brazilian law, the non‑Brazilian holder may invest in the common shares under Resolution 2,689, of January 26, 2000, of the CMN (“2,689 holder”).

Taxation of Dividends

As a result of the tax legislation adopted on December 26, 1995, dividends based on profits generated after January 1, 1996, including dividends paid in kind, payable by us in respect of common shares or ADSs, are exempt from withholding income tax.  Dividends relating to profits generated prior to January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates, depending on the year the profits were generated.

Taxation of Gains

Gains realized outside Brazil by a non‑Brazilian holder on the disposition of ADSs to another non‑Brazilian holder are not currently subject to Brazilian tax.  However, according to certain interpretations of Law no. 10,833 of December 2003, or Law No. 10,833, the disposition of assets located in Brazil by a non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holder, whether to other non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holder or Brazilian holders, may become subject to taxation in Brazil.  Although we believe that the ADSs do not fall within the definition of assets located in Brazil for the purposes of Law no. 10,833, considering the general and unclear scope of it and the lack of definitive judicial court ruling to act as the leading case in respect thereto, we are unable to predict whether such understanding will ultimately prevail in the courts of Brazil.

Thus,In case the argument above does not prevail the gain on disposition of ADSs by a non‑Brazilian holder to a resident in Brazil (oror even to a non Braziliannon-Brazilian resident in case the argument above does not prevail) may be subject to income tax in Brazil according to the rules described below for ADSs or the tax rules applicable to common shares, as applicable.

TheAlthough there is no clear regulatory guidance, the withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for common shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax provided that the regulatory rules are appropriately observed in respect to the registration of the investment before the Central Bank of Brazil.  The deposit of common shares in exchange for ADSs may be subject to Brazilian capital income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%, in case the non‑Brazilian holder is located in a tax haven, if the acquisition cost of the common shares is lower than (1) the average price per common share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of deposit, or (2) if no common shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of common shares were sold in the fifteen trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit.  In this case, the difference between the acquisition cost and the average price of the common shares, calculated as above, shall be considered a capital gain.

132


For Brazilian purposes, as of January 2009, a tax haven is considered a regime:  (i) which does not impose income tax or does so at a rate of 20% or lower, or (ii) where applicable local legislation imposes restrictions on the disclosure of the shareholding composition or the ownership of investments, or on the ultimate beneficiary of the income derived from transactions carried out and attributable to a non-Braziliannon‑Brazilian holder.

On June 24, 2008, Law No. 11,727 was enacted defining the concept of a “privileged tax regime” in connection with transactions subject to transfer pricing and thin capitalization rules.  In this conception, privileged tax regimes are more comprehensive than tax havens.  A “privileged tax regime” is considered to be a jurisdiction that meets any of the following requirements:  (i) which does not tax income or taxes income at a maximum rate lower than 20.0%; (ii) grants tax advantages to a non-residentnon‑resident entity or individual (a) without requiring substantial economic activity in the jurisdiction of such non-residentnon‑resident entity or individual or (b) to the extent such non-residentnon‑resident entity or individual does not conduct substantial economic activity in the jurisdiction of such non-residentnon‑resident entity or individual; (iii) does not tax income generated abroad, or imposes tax on income generated abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20.0%, or (iv) restricts the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions.


Notwithstanding the fact that the “privileged tax regime” concept was enacted in connection with Brazilian transfer pricing and thin capitalization rules, there is no assurance that Brazilian tax authorities will not attempt to apply the concept of privileged tax regimes to other types of transactions, such as investments in the Brazilian financial and capital markets.  We recommend that prospective investors consult their own tax advisors from time to time to verify any possible tax consequences of Law No. 11,727.

Gains realized on disposition of common shares, are subject to income tax in Brazil, regardless of whether the sale or the disposition is made by the non‑Brazilian holder to a resident or person domiciled in Brazil or not, based on the fact that the common shares could be considered as assets located in Brazil for purposes of Law No. 10,833.

Thus, for purposes of taxation of gains earned in a sale or disposition of common shares carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions carried out on the organized over‑the‑counter market):

§are exempt from income tax when assessed by a 2,689 holder and is not a tax haven based holder; and
§are subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in any other case, including gains assessed by a non-Brazilian

·are exempt from income tax when assessed by a 2,689 holder and is not a tax haven based holder; and

·are subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in any other case, including gains assessed by a non‑Brazilian holder that (1) is not a 2,689 holder, or (2) is a 2,689 holder and is not a tax haven based holder but is a tax haven based holder.  In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% shall be applicable and can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.

Any other gains assessed on the disposition of the common shares that are not carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange are subject to income tax a rate of 15%, except for tax haven holder which, in this case, is subject to income tax at a rate of 25%.  In case these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non‑organized over‑the‑counter market with intermediation, the withholding income tax of 0.005% shall also be applicable and can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.

In the case of redemption of securities or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, such as ourselves, the positive difference between the amount effectively received by the non‑Brazilian holder and the corresponding acquisition cost is treated, for tax purposes, as capital gain derived from disposition of common shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market, and is therefore subject to income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be.

Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the common shares will not be subject to Brazilian income tax.  Any gain on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to the common shares by a non‑Brazilian holder of common shares or ADSs will be subject to Brazilian taxation at the same rate applicable to the sale or disposition of common shares.

There is no assurance that the current preferential treatment for holders of ADSs and non‑Brazilian holders of common shares under Resolution 2,689 will continue in the future or that it will not be changed in the future.  Reductions in the rate of tax provided for by Brazil’s tax treaties do not apply to the tax on gains realized on sales or exchange of common shares.

133


Interest Attributed to Shareholders’ Equity

According to Brazilian laws and our bylaws, we may opt to distribute income as interest attributed to shareholders’ equity as an alternative to the payment of dividends.

Distribution of an interest on equity charge attributed to shareholders’ equity in respect of the common shares or ADSs as an alternative form of payment to shareholders, including non‑Brazilian holders of common shares or ADSs, is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%, in case of a tax‑haven based holder.  Such payments, subject to certain limitations and requirements, are deductible for Brazilian income tax purposes.

Other Brazilian Taxes

There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of common shares or ADSs by a non‑Brazilian holder, except for gift and inheritance taxes, which are levied by some states of Brazil on gifts made or inheritances bestowed by a non‑Brazilian holder to individuals or entities resident or domiciled within such states in Brazil.  There is no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by a non‑Brazilian holder of common shares or ADSs.

Tax on Financial Transactions (Imposto sobre Operações Financeiras, or IOF)


The IOF is a tax on foreign exchange, securities, credit and insurance transactions.  The IOF rate may be changed by an Presidential Decree (rather than a law).  In addition, the IOF rate is not subject to the ex‑post‑facto principle, which provides that laws increasing the rate of or creating new taxes will only come into effect as of the latter of (i) the first day of the year following their publication, or (ii) ninety days after their publication, and therefore, any increase in the IOF rate has an immediate effect.  A statute increasing the IOF rate will as a result only take effect from its publication date.

Although the maximum rate of IOF is 25% for foreign exchange transactions, the inflow and outflow of funds are generally subject to IOF at a rate of 0.38%; however, effective as of December 1, 2011, exchange transactions for the inflow of funds in Brazil for investments made by foreign investors are subject to IOF at a rate of 0% for variable income transactions carried out on the Brazilian stock, futures and commodities exchanges, as well as for acquisitions of common shares of Brazilian publicly-heldpublicly‑held companies in public offerings or subscription of common shares related to capital contributions, provided that the company has registered its common shares for trading on the stock exchange.  The IOF rate will also be 0% for the outflow of funds from Brazil related to these type of investments, including payments of dividends and interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity.  Lastly, the 0% rate also applies to settlements of simultaneous foreign exchange transactions for the cancellation of depositary receipts transferred into shares traded on the stock exchange.

The IOF may also be imposed on any transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on Brazilian futures and commodities stock exchanges.  As a general rule, the rate of this tax for transactions involving common shares or ADSs is currently zero, although the assignment of shares traded on Brazilian stock exchanges to issue depositary receipts traded abroad is subject to IOF at the rate of 1.5%.  The executive branch, also by a Presidential Decree, may increase the IOF rate by up to 1.5% per day, but only with respect to future transactions.

United StatesU.S.  Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs as of the date hereof.  This discussion applies only to a beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is a “U.S. holder”.holder.”  As used herein, the term “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of a common share or ADS that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:

§

·an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

·a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

·an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

134


·        

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
§a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
§an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
§a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Department regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds common shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.  A U.S. holder that is a partner of a partnership holding common shares or ADSs should consult its tax advisors.

Except where noted, this discussion deals only with common shares or ADSs held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and does not deal with U.S. holders that may be subject to special U.S. federal income tax rules, such as dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-marketmark‑to‑market method of accounting for their securities holdings, banks or other financial institutions, tax-exempttax‑exempt organizations, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, persons holding common shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, persons liable for alternative minimum tax, pass-throughpass‑through entities and investors in a pass-throughpass‑through entity, persons owning 10% or more of our voting stock, or persons whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar.

This discussion is based upon the provisions of the Code, and existing and proposed U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, and judicial decisions as of the date hereof.  Such authorities may be repealed, revoked or modified so as toresult in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below, possibly with retroactive effect.  In addition, this discussion is based, in part, upon representations made by the Depositary to us and assumes that the deposit agreement, and all other related agreements, will be performed in accordance with their terms.


Except as specifically described below, this discussion assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  Please see the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below.  Further, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift, alternative minimum tax, medicare tax, state, local or non‑U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, holding or disposing of common shares or ADSs.

ADSs

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, U.S. holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of the underlying common shares that are represented by such ADSs.  Deposits or withdrawals of common shares by U.S. holders for ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.  However, the U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concerns that parties involved in transactions wherein depositary shares are pre‑released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by the holders of ADSs.  Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Brazilian income taxes described herein could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Taxation of Dividends

The gross amount of distributions paid to a U.S. holder (including amounts withheld by the Brazilian taxing authority, if any, and any payments of interest on shareholders’ equity, as described above under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations”) will be treated as dividend income to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles.  Such income generally will be includable in a U.S. holder'sholder’s gross income as ordinary income when actually or constructively received by the U.S. holder, in the case of common shares, or when actually or constructively received by the Depositary, in the case of ADSs.  Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.  To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution will first be treated as a tax‑free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADS, causing a reduction in such adjusted tax basis (and thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized on a subsequent disposition of our common shares or ADSs), and thereafter as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange.  Because we do not expect to maintain calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, U.S. holdersshould expect that a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  Distributions of additional common shares or ADSs to U.S. holders that are part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

135


The amount of any dividend paid inreais will equal the U.S. dollar value of thereais received calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the dividend is received by the U.S. holder, in the case of common shares, or by the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, regardless of whether thereais are converted into U.S. dollars.  If thereais received as a dividend are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, the U.S. holder will have a tax basis in thereais equal to their U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  Any gain or loss realized on a subsequent conversion or other disposition of thereais will be foreign currency gain or loss that is treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.  If dividends paid inreais are converted into U.S. dollars on the day they are received by the U.S. holder or the Depositary, as the case may be, U.S. holders generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of any foreign currency gain or loss if anyreais received by the U.S. holder or the Depositary or its agent are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt.

Certain dividends received by certain non‑corporate U.S. holders may be eligible for preferential tax rates so long as (1) specified holding period requirements are met, (2) the U.S. holder is not under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property, (3) the company paying the dividend is a “qualified foreign corporation” and (4) the company is not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the year of distribution or the prior year.  We do not believe that we were classified as a PFIC for our prior taxable year nor do we expect to be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year.  We generally will be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to our ADSs so long as the ADS remain listed on the NYSE.  Based on existing guidance, however, it is not entirely clear whether dividends received with respect to the common shares (to the extent not represented by ADSs) will be eligible for this treatment, because thecommon shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors about the application of this preferential tax rate to dividends paid directly on common shares.


Subject to certain complex limitations and conditions (including a minimum holding period requirement), Brazilian income taxes withheld on dividends, if any, may be treated as foreign income taxes eligible for credit against a U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability.  Alternatively, atif a U.S. holder’s election if itholder does not elect to claim a foreign income tax credit for any foreign taxes paid during the taxable year, all foreign income taxes paid may instead be deducted in computing such U.S. holder’s taxable income.  For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on our common shares will be treated as income from sources outside the United States.  For the purposes of the U.S. foreign tax credit limitations, the dividends paid by us should generally constitute “passive category income” for most U.S. holders.  The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex.  U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Capital Gains

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of a common share or ADS in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized for the common share or ADS and the U.S. holder'sholder’s adjusted tax basis in the common share or ADS, determined in U.S. dollars.  Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss.  The capital gain or loss will be long‑term capital gain or loss if at the time of sale, exchange or other taxable disposition the U.S. holder has held our common shares or ADSs for more than one year.  Capital gains of individuals derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation.  The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.  Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder will generally be treated as U.S. source gain or loss.  Consequently, a U.S. holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit arising from Brazilian income tax imposed, if any, on the disposition of a common share or ADS unless such credit can be applied (subject to applicable limitations) against U.S. federal income tax due on other income treated as derived from foreign sources.  Although we do not believe that U.S. holders will be entitled to a credit or deduction with respect to any IOF tax paid on our common shares (as discussed above in “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Tax on Financial Transactions (Imposto sobre Operações Financeiras, or IOF),, U.S. holders should, however, be entitled to include the amount of the IOF tax paid as part of their initial tax basis in such common shares.

136


Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

Based upon our current and projected income, assets, activities and business plans, we do not expect the common shares or ADSs to be considered shares of a PFIC for our current fiscal year (although the determination cannot be made until the end of such fiscal year), and we intend to continue our operations in such a manner that we do not expect to be classified as a PFIC in the foreseeable future.  However, because the determination of whether the common shares or ADSs constitute shares of a PFIC will be based upon the composition of our income, assets and the nature of our business, as well as the income, assets and business of entities in which we hold at least a 25% interest, from time to time, and because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules, there can be no assurance that the common shares or ADSs will not be considered shares of a PFIC for any fiscal year.  If the common shares or ADSs were shares of a PFIC for any fiscal year, U.S. holders (including certain indirect U.S. holders) may be subject to adverse tax consequences, including the possible imposition of an interest charge on gains or “excess distributions” allocable to prior years in the U.S. holder’s holding period during which we were determined to be a PFIC.  If we are deemed to be a PFIC for a taxable year, dividends on our ADSs would not be qualified dividend income eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income taxation.  In addition, a U.S. holder that owns common shares or ADSs during any taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC would generally be required to file IRS form 8621, as well as comply with additional annual filing requirements imposed under recently enacted legislation.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules (including any information reporting requirements in connection therewith) to the common shares or ADSs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of our common shares or ADSs or the proceeds received on the sale, exchange, or redemption of our ADSs, in each case to the extent treated as being paid within the United States (and in certain cases, outside of the United States) to a U.S. holder unless a U.S. holder establishes its status as an exempt recipient, and backup withholding may apply to such amounts if the U.S. holder does not establish its status as an exempt recipient or fails to provide a correct taxpayer identification number and certify that such U.S. holder is not subject to backup withholding.  The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as arefund or credit against such U.S. holder'sholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the U.S. holder timely furnishes the required information to the IRS.


In addition, U.S. holders should be aware that recently enacted legislation imposes newadditional reporting requirements apply with respect to the holding of certain foreign financial assets, including stock of foreign issuers which is not held in an account maintained by a financial institution, if the aggregate value of all of such assets exceeds US$50,000.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting rules to our common shares and ADSs and the application of the recently enacted legislationthese additional reporting requirements for foreign financial assets to their particular situation.

F.Dividends and Payments Agents

Not applicable.

G.Statements by Experts

Not applicable.

H.Documents on Display

We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and supplemented, or the Exchange Act.  Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC.  You may inspect and copy reports and other information filed by us at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549.  You may obtain copies of these materials upon written request fromOur filings will also be available at the Public Reference Section of the CommissionSEC’s website at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549 for certain fees.  Youhttp://www.sec.gov. Reports and other information may also inspect this materialbe inspected and copied at the offices of the NYSE at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.  In addition to the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC and the NYSE, you may obtain a copy of the annual report, upon written request from the depositary for our ADSs at its corporate trust office

137


Our website is located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286.http://www.sabesp.com.br and our investor relations website is located at http://www.sabesp.com.br/investors. (These URLs are intended to be an inactive textual reference only. They are not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated into this annual report.)   

We also furnish to the depositary annual reports in English including audited annual financial statements and unaudited quarterly financial statements in English for each of the first three quarters of the fiscal year.  We also furnish to the depositary English translations or summaries of all notices of shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications that are made generally available to holders of common shares.

I.Subsidiary Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks—risks, in particular, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk.  We are exposed to foreign currency risk because a substantial portion of our financial indebtedness is denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, while we generate all of our net operating revenues in reais.reais.  Similarly, we are subject to interest rate risk based upon changes in interest rates, which affect our net financial expenses.  For further information on our market risks, see Note 3.1 to our consolidated financial statements.statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 included elsewhere in this annual report.

Exchange Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, R$3,215.8 million, R$3,053.4 million and R$2,248.9, or 35.5%, 35.5% and 27.2%, respectively, of our debt obligations were denominated in foreign currencies.  As a result, we are exposed to exchange rate risks that may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to meet debt service obligations.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We estimate that the potential loss to us in connection with U.S. dollar and yen-denominated debt that would have resulted as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 from each hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 1% change in the U.S. dollar and yen against thereal would have been approximately R$32.3 million, R$30.7 million and R$22.6, respectively.  Consistent with these estimates, a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 10% change in this exchange rate would have resulted in losses of approximately R$323.1 million, R$306.7 million and R$226.0 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The fluctuation of therealin relation to the U.S. dollar and yen for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

 

(in percentages)

Depreciation (appreciation) of therealin relation to the U.S. dollar

8.9

12.6

(4.3)

Depreciation (appreciation) of thereal in relation to the yen

(2.4)

18.6

9.0

We have not utilized derivative financial instruments in the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we had no short‑term indebtedness outstanding, other than the current portion of long‑term debt.

138


Interest Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, R$2,223.8 million, or 24.5%, R$2,537.1 million, or 29.5%, and R$2,259.4 million, or 30.6%, respectively, of our total debt outstanding balance denominated inreais was based on variable rates of interest based on the UPR, which is equivalent to the TR.  In addition, as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, R$1,835.9, or 20.2%, R$1,882.3 million, or 21.9%, and R$2,064.7 million, or 25.0%, respectively, of our total debt denominated inreais was subject to interest rates based on the CDI.  As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, R$1,319.5 million, R$747.3 million and R$579.2, respectively, of our foreign-currency denominated debt was based on the IADB and the IBRD variable rates of interest, which are determined based on the cost of funding of these multilateral organizations in each period.

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we did not have any derivative contracts outstanding which limited exposure to changes in the UPR or the CDI or in the IADB or IBRD variable rates.  However, we are obliged by law to invest our excess cash with financial institutions controlled by the Brazilian government.  We invest these excess funds, which totaled R$1,796.6 million, R$2,027.0 million and R$1,852.6 million as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, mainly in short-term instruments.  As a result, our exposure to Brazilian interest rate risk is partially limited by ourreal-denominated floating interest time deposits investments, which generally earn interest based on the CDI.  In addition to our exposure with respect to existing indebtedness, we may become exposed to interest rate volatility with respect to indebtedness incurred in the future.

We estimate that we would have suffered a loss over periods of one year, respectively, of up to R$90.7 million, R$86.0 million and R$82.6 million if a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rates applicable to financial liabilities as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, had occurred.  Consistent with these estimates, a hypothetical instantaneous and unfavorable 1000 basis points change in these interest rates would have resulted in losses of approximately R$906.9 million, R$859.6 million and R$826.5 million as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  This sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis point movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial liabilities and sustained over a period of one year, as applicable, and that such movement may or may not affect interest rates applicable to any other homogenous category of financial liabilities.

A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (i.e., U.S. dollars).  As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the effect of interest rate fluctuation on these financial instruments, as consistently unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

The tables below provide information about our interest rate-sensitive instruments.  For variable interest rate debt, the rate presented is the weighted average rate calculated as of December 31, 2012.  For the foreign currency denominated obligations, these amounts have been converted at the selling rates as of December 31, 2012 and do not represent amounts which may actually be payable with respect to such obligations on the dates indicated.

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

Expected maturity date

 

2013

2014

2015

After 2016

Total

Average annual interest rate

 

(in millions, except percentages)

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents denominated inreais

1,801.3

-

-

-

1,801.3

 

 

1,801.3

-

-

-

1,801.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

long-term debt(current and non current portion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by TR or UPR

533.0

213.0

113.9

1,363.9

2,223.8

8.8%

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by TJLP

76.4

89.0

94.1

589.2

848.7

1.7%

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by IPCA

46.3

12.3

23.8

646.9

729.3

13.0%

Floating rate, denominated inreaisindexed by CDI

514.0

270.0

860.2

191.7

1,835.9

8.3%

Fixed rate, denominated inreais

-

-

-

215.8

215.8

 

Floating rate, denominated in U.S. dollars

76.6

72.3

72.3

663.4

884.6

2.6%

Fixed rate, denominated in Yen

58.3

51.9

51.9

734.0

896.1

2.3%

Fixed rate, denominated in U.S. dollars

62.8

54.6

54.6

1,263.1

1,435.1

3.5%

Total long‑term debt.....

1,367.4

763.1

1,270.8

5,668.0

9,069.3

6.2%

139


The percentage of our indebtedness subject to fixed and floating interest rate is as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

Floating rate debt:

 

 

 

Denominated in U.S. dollars

9.8%

13.3%

11.7%

Denominated inreais

62.2%

63.9%

72.8%

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate debt:

 

 

 

Denominated inreais

2.4%

0.6%

Denominated in Yen

9.9%

11.2%

5.3%

Denominated in U.S. dollars

15.8%

11.0%

10.2%

Total

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

A.Debt Securities

Not applicable.

B.Warrants and Rights

Not applicable. 

C.    Other Securities

Not applicable.

D.    American Depositary Shares140



 

C.Other Securities

Not applicable.

D.American Depositary Shares

In the United States, our common shares trade in the form of ADS.  EachFollowing a ratio change effected on January 24, 2013, each ADS represents one common share of our company.  Following a stock split which took place on April 22, 2013, we issued two common shares,new ADSs for each ADS currently trading and distributed them to our holders on April 29, 2013. The ADSs are issued by The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary pursuant to a Deposit Agreement.  The ADSs commenced trading on the NYSE on May 10, 2002.

Fees and Expenses

The following table summarizes the fees and expenses payable by holders of ADRs:

Persons depositing common shares or ADR holders must pay:

For:

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of common shares or rights or other property

Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

 

US$0.020.05 (or less) per ADS or portion thereof (to the extent not prohibited by the rules of any stock exchange on which the ADSs are listed for trading)

Any cash distribution to you

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been common shares and the common shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs

Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADR holders

US$0.020.05 (or less) per ADS or portion thereof per calendar year (to(in addition to the extent the depositary has not collected a cash distribution fee of $.02 per ADS that the depositary has collected during the year)

Depositary services

Persons depositing common shares or ADR holders must pay:

For:

Registration or transfer fees

Transfer and registration of common shares on our common share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw common shares

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions expenses (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)

Expenses of the depositary in converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)

Expenses of the depositary

 

Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADR or common share underlying an ADR, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes

As necessary

Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities

No charges of this type are currently made in the Brazilian market

 

Payment of Taxes

The depositary may deduct the amount of any taxes owed from any payments to you.  It may also sell deposited securities, by public or private sale, to pay any taxes owed.  You will remain liable if the proceeds of the sale are not sufficient to pay the taxes.  If the depositary sells deposited securities, it will, if appropriate, reduce the number of ADSs to reflect the sale and pay to you any proceeds, or send to you any property, remaining after it has paid the taxes.

Reimbursement of Fees

The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, has agreed to reimburse us for expenses we incur that are related to establishment and maintenance expenses of the ADS program.  The depositary has agreed to reimburse us for ourcontinuing annual stock exchange listing fees.  The depositary has also agreed to pay the standard out-of-pocketout‑of‑pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, which consist of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of United States federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls.  It has also agreed to reimburse us annually for certain investor relationship programs or special investor relations promotional activities.  In certain instances, the depositary has agreedto provide additional payments to us based on any applicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility.  There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to the Company is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors.

141



 

The depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them.  The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees.  The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deduction from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entrybook‑entry system accounts of participants acting for them.  The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attractingfee‑attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

Reimbursement of Fees Incurred in 20112012

From January 1, 2011 until2012 to December 31, 2011,2012, we received reimbursements in the Company received from the depositaryamount of US$484,895.873,432,399.9 for standard out-of-pocketout‑of‑pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, (consisting of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls), any applicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility, underwritingmarketing fees and legal fees.

PART II

ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We carried out an evaluation under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, including those defined in the United States Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)13a‑15(e), as of the year ended December 31, 2011. 2012.

As a result of this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were both designed and effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2011,2012, that the information required to be disclosed in our filings and submissions under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management’s annual report onmanagement is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

142


Our internal control over financial reporting is includeda process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in this annualaccordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles.  Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control —Integrated Framework” issued by COSO.

As a result of the assessment described above, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2012, we did maintain effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by COSO.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes, has issued an audit report on page F-2.the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.  That report is included below.

c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

To the Shareholders, Board of Directors and Management of
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de
São Paulo – SABESP São Paulo – SP                                   

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  The opinion by our independent registered public accounting firm onCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is includeda process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board(IASB). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

143


Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company and our report of PricewaterhouseCoopersdated May 15, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes that is included in this annual report on page F-3.
May 15
, 2013
São Paulo, Brazil.

d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 1616.[RESERVED] 

A.ITEM 16A.           Audit Committee Financial Expert

At our board meeting held on June 26, 2006, we established an audit committee, as defined under section 3(a)(58) of the Exchange Act.  Our board of directors has determined that Jerônimo Antunes qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined for the purposes of this Item 16A in Item 16 of Form 20-F.20‑F.  Jerônimo Antunes is an “independent director” within the meaning of the SEC rules.

B.ITEM 16B.           Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F20‑F under the Exchange Act.  Our code of business conduct and ethics, called Code of Ethics and Conduct, applies to all of our employees, including our directors, chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chiefhead of accounting, officer, as well as our suppliers and third-partythird‑party contractors.  To ensure compliance with the Code of Ethics and Conduct, we have an Ethics Committee and an internal Whistle-blowing Channel, as well as a Corporate Accountability Procedure and an Ombudsman Office as well as a Customer Service that receive external complaints.  The internal channel can receive anonymous whistle blowing.  The results of the investigations are forwarded to the Audit Committee.  Cases of recurrence are reported to the Ethics Committee, which urges the related departments to develop preventive actions.  In 2012, 160 whistle blowings were recorded, 61% of which were verified and 39% are under investigation.  Out of the total, 22% refer to misconduct, such as moral harassment, discrimination, persecution and unfair treatment. During 2012, 27 of our employees or outsourced employees received penalties (1 warning, 2 suspensions and 24 dismissals). Our Ethics Committee is also responsible for addressing relevant inquiries and interpreting the norms of the Code of Ethics for all of our employees.  Our Code of Ethics and Conduct is available on our web siteat http://www.sabesp.com.br at the following location:  Investors Relations – Corporate Governance.  If we amend the provisions of our Code of Ethics and Conduct, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose the amendment or waiver on our web site at the same address.  You can obtain copies of our Code of Ethics and Conduct, without charge, upon request to sabesp.ri@sabesp.com.br.sabesp.ri@sabesp.com.br

144


C.ITEM 16C.           Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes’s activity began with the review of the Quarterly Information (“ITRs”) reporting for the third quarter of 2012.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the first and second quarter of 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 20102011 and 2011.2010.

The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered to us by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes and PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes in 20102012, 2011 and 2011: 2010:

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2010

2011

2012

2011

2010

(in millions ofreais)  

(in millions ofreais

 

Audit Fees(1)

2.6

3.9

Audit-Related Fees

-

Audit Fees(1)

2.5

3.9

2.6

Audit‑Related Fees

Tax Fees

-

All Other Fees

-

Total

2.6

3.9

2.5

3.9

2.6

_________________

______________

(1)   Audit Fees are the fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers for the audit of our annual financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.  Audit fees billed by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 and interim review of our quarterly financial information for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

Pre-approvalPre‑approval policies and procedures

Pursuant to Brazilian law, our board of directors is responsible, among other matters, for the selection, dismissal and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm.  Our management is required to obtain the board of directors’ approval before engaging an independent registered public accounting firm to provide any audit or permitted non-auditnon‑audit services to us.  The Brazilian Federal and State Public Bidding Laws also apply to us with respect to obtaining services from third parties for our business, including the services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm.  As part of the bidding process, the independent registered public accounting firm is required to submit proposals, and are then selected by us based on certain criteria including technical expertise and cost.

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2011, PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes did not provide non‑audit services to us.  During 2012, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes did not provide non-audit services to us.

D.ITEM 16D.           Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

None.

E.ITEM 16E.           Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not applicable.

F.    Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant145



 

Not applicable.ITEM 16F.           Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

In accordance with CVM Instruction 308/99, as amended, we have contracted Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes for the external auditing of us, replacing PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes.

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes’s activity began with the review of ITRs reporting for the third quarter of 2012.

The appointment occurred due to the expiration of the contract with PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, the term of which was limited to 60 months, in compliance with legislation applicable to us (clause 57 of Law 8666/93).This appointment ended upon the issuance of their review report for the second quarter on August 10, 2012.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes’s audit reports of our financial statements for December 31, 2011 and 2010 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and through August 10,2012, we have had no disagreements with PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, would have caused PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its report on our financial statements for such periods.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and through August 10, 2012, there have been no reportable events as defined under Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.

We have provided PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes with a copy of this annual report prior to its filing with the SEC and requested that PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the statements made in this Item 16F.  A copy of PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes’s letter to the SEC dated May 15, 2013 is included as Exhibit 15.1 to this annual report.

On May 22, 2012, we engaged Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes as our new independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements.  The decision to engage Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes was approved by our board of directors present at a meeting on February 23, 2012.

Prior to the engagement of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes as our independent registered public accounting firm, we had not previously consulted with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, (2) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, or (3) a reportable event (as provided in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F) during our two most recent fiscal years and any later interim period, including the interim period up to and including the date that Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes was engaged..

G.item 16g.          Corporate Governance

Significant Differences between our Corporate Governance Practices and NYSE Corporate GovernanceStandards

We are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.  As a foreign private issuer, the standards applicable to us are considerably different than the standards applied to U.S. listed companies.  Under the NYSE rules, we are required only to:  (a) have an audit committee or audit board, pursuant to an applicable exemption available to foreign private issuers, that meets certain requirements, as discussed below, (b) provide promptcertification by our chief executive officer of any material non-compliancenon‑compliance with any corporate governance rules, and (c) provide a brief description of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE corporate governance practice required to be followed by U.S. listed companies.  The discussion of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those required of U.S. listed companies follows below.

146


Majority of Independent Directors

The NYSE rules require that a majority of the board must consist of independent directors.  Independence is defined by various criteria, including the absence of a material relationship between the director and the listed company.  Brazilian law does not have a similar requirement.  Under Brazilian law, neither our board of directors nor our management is required to test the independence of directors before their election to the board.  However, both the Brazilian Corporate Law and the CVM have established rules that require directors to meet certain qualification requirements and that address the compensation and duties and responsibilities of, as well as the restrictions applicable to, a company’s executive officers and directors.  Our board of directors must have a minimum of five members and 20% of the board (even if the board consists of greater than five members) must be independent as defined under Novo Mercado Regulations.  Currently, threefour of our tennine directors are independent, pursuant to the Novo Mercado Listing Regulations.  We believe these rules provide adequate assurances that our directors are independent; however, they do not require that we have a majority of independent directors, as required under the NYSE rules.

Executive Sessions

NYSE rules require that the non-managementnon‑management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present.  The Brazilian Corporate Law does not have a similar provision.  According to the Brazilian Corporate Law, up to one-thirdone‑third of the members of the board of directors can be elected from management.  There is no requirement that non-managementnon‑management directors meet regularly without management.  Our chairperson and Chief Executive Officer is a member of our board of directors.  All other members of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors meet the NYSE’s definition of “non-management”“non‑management” directors.  The non-managementnon‑management directors on our board do not typically meet in executive session.  Our board of directors consists of ten non-managementeight non‑management directors.

Fiscal Committee

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, theConselho Fiscal, or fiscal committee, is a corporate body independent of management and a company’s external auditors.  The fiscal committee may be either permanent or non-permanent,non‑permanent, in which case it is appointed by the shareholders to act during a specific fiscal year.  A fiscal committee is not equivalent to, or comparable with, a U.S. audit committee.  The primary responsibility of the fiscal committee is to review management’s activities and a company’s financial statements, and to report its findings to a company’s shareholders.  The Brazilian Corporate Law requires fiscal committee members to receive as remuneration at least 10% of the average annual amount paid to a company’s executive officers.  The Brazilian Corporate Law requires a fiscal committee to be composed of a minimum of three and a maximum of five members and their respective alternates.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the fiscal committee may not contain members that (i) are on our board of directors, (ii) are on the board of executive officers, (iii) are employed by us or a controlled company, or (iv) are spouses or relatives of any member of our management, up to the third degree.

Our fiscal committee consists of fivefour members and fivefour alternates and the members meet once a month.

Audit Committee


NYSE rules require that listed companies have an audit committee that (i) is composed of a minimum of three independent directors who are all financially literate, (ii) meets the SEC rules regarding audit committees for listed companies, (iii) has at least one member who has accounting or financial management expertise and (iv) is governed by a written charter addressing the committee’s required purpose and detailing its required responsibilities.  However, as a foreign private issuer, we need only to comply with the requirement that the audit committee meet the SEC rules regarding audit committees for listed companies to the extent compatible with Brazilian Corporate Law. Our audit committee, which is not equivalent to, or comparable with, a U.S. audit committee, provides assistance to our board of directors on matters involving accounting, internal controls, financial reporting and compliance.  The audit committee recommends the appointment of our independent auditors to our board of directors and reviews the compensation of our independent auditors and helps coordinate their activities.  It also evaluates the effectiveness of our internal financial and legal compliance controls.  The audit committee comprises three members elected by the board of directors for a one-yearone‑year term with the right to re-election,re‑election, all three of which are independent.  The current members of our audit committee are Jerônimo Antunes, Reinaldo Guerreiro and Heraldo Gilberto de Oliveira.Francisco Vidal Luna.  All members meet the independent membership requirements of the SEC and NYSE as well as other NYSE requirements.  Jerônimo Antunes is the committee’s “financial expert” within the scope of the SEC rules covering the disclosure of financial experts on audit committees in periodic filings pursuant to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

147


Nomination/Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees

NYSE rules require that listed companies have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors and governed by a written charter addressing the committee’s required purpose and detailing its required responsibilities.  Required responsibilities for the nominating/corporate governance committee include, among other things, identifying and selecting qualified board member nominees and developing a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the company.  Required responsibilities for the compensation committee include, among other things, reviewing corporate goals relevant to the chief executive officer’s compensation, evaluating the chief executive officer’s performance, approving the chief executive officer’s compensation levels and recommending to the board non-chiefnon‑chief executive officer compensation, incentive-compensationincentive‑compensation and equity-basedequity‑based plans.

We are not required under applicable Brazilian law to have a nomination/corporate governance committee or compensation committee.  Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the total amount available for compensation of our directors and executive officers and for profit-sharingprofit‑sharing payments to our executive officers is established by our shareholders at the annual general meeting.  The board of directors is then responsible for determining the individual compensation and profit-sharingprofit‑sharing of each executive officer, as well as the compensation of our board and committee members.  In making such determinations, the board reviews the performance of the executive officers, including the performance of our chief executive officer, who typically excuses himself from discussions regarding his performance and compensation.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

NYSE rules require that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with limited exceptions.  We do not currently have any equity compensation plan.  If such a plan were to be implemented, there is no requirement under Brazilian Corporate Law for the plan to be approved by our shareholders.  However, if the issuance of new shares in connection with any equity compensation plan exceeded the authorized capital under our bylaws, the increase in capital would require shareholder approval.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

NYSE rules require that listed companies adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines.  We are in compliance with the adoption of corporate governance provisions and guidelines required under the Novo Mercado Regulations.  Additionally, under the CVM’s guidelines, we have established (i) the Policy of Publicizing Acts or Relevant Facts and the Preservation of Confidentiality which requires us to publicly disclose all relevant information and (ii) the Securities Negotiation Policy which requires management to inform the CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA of any purchases or sales of our securities.  We believe the corporate governance guidelines applicable to us under the Novo Mercado Regulations, as well as the CVM, do not conflict with the guidelines established by the NYSE.  Our corporate governance guidelines and practices are available in our website at www.sabesp.com.br and in our annual management report.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

NYSE rules require that listed companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Applicable Brazilian law does not have a similar requirement.  We have decided to adopt and disclose a code of ethics and conduct applicable to all our officers, directors and employees.  The adoptionand disclosure of a formal code is not required under the Brazilian Corporate Law.  We believe our formal code addresses the matters required to be addressed by the applicable NYSE and SEC rules.

148



 

Internal Audit Function

NYSE rules require that listed companies maintain an internal audit function to provide management and the audit committee with ongoing assessments of the company’s risk management processes and system of internal control.  Our internal audit department is under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our audit committee and is responsible for our compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Our internal audit department reports to our chief executive officer and the audit committee.

Citezens’ Access to Information at Sabesp

The federal law nº. 12,527/11 (LAI), regulated by State Decree nº 58.052/12, determines that bodies and entities of the Public Administration must create an unit to make available Citizen Information Services – SIC in order to serve and guide citizens, receive and manage information requests, as well as make available to the citizen information of his/her interest and the requirement to present the motives or reasons of request is forbidden.

Sabesp, in order to comply with LAI, implemented the Citizen Information Service - SIC, structuring the internal flow of information to serve citizen within the terms provided for by laws and is drafting the Table of documents, data and information, defining restrictive information, protecting business strategic information and pursuing the transparent management. Sabesp also made available at its website basic information required by laws and the software to citizen request information, according to the standards of the State Government of São Paulo.

These duties are linked to the Risk Management area whose main assumption is the transparency, quality of information and compliance with strategic rules of a listed company.

ITEM 16h.          MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this Item.

ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms, are filed as part of this annual report.  See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

ITEM 19.EXHIBITS

Item

Description

1.1

By-lawsBy‑laws of the Registrant (English translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K6‑K filed on April 27, 2012)May, 1 2013).

4.1

Agreement between the Registrant and the State Department of Water and Energy (Departamento de Águas e Energia Elétrica—DAEE), dated April 24, 1997 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-1F‑1 filed on April 8, 2002 (the “April 8, 2002 Form F-1”F‑1”).

4.2

Protocol of Understanding between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, dated September 30, 1997 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the April 8, 2002 Form F-1)F‑1).

4.3

Agreement between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, through the Secretariat of Finance, dated September 10, 2001 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the April 8, 2002 Form F-1)F‑1).

4.4

Agreement between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, through the Secretariat of the Treasury, dated December 11, 2001 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the April 8, 2002 Form F-1)F‑1).

4.5

Amendment to the Agreement, dated April 24, 1997, between the Registrant and the DAEE, dated March 16, 2000 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the April 8, 2002 Form F-1)F‑1).

149


Item

Description

4.6

Amendment to the Agreement, dated April 24, 1997, between the Registrant and the DAEE, dated November 21, 2001 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the April 8, 2002 Form F-1).

4.7

First Amendment to the Agreement, dated December 11, 2001, between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, dated March 22, 2004. (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Form 20-F filed on June 28, 2004).

4.8

Second Amendment to the Agreement, dated December 11, 2001, between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, dated December 28, 2007. (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on February 25, 2008).

4.9

Third Amendment to the Agreement, dated December 11, 2001, between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, dated November 17, 2008. (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on December 23, 2008).

4.10

Commitment Agreement, between the Registrant and the State of São Paulo, dated March 26, 2008. (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on April 28, 2008).


Item

Description

4.11

Agreement Executed between the Registrant and the São Paulo City Government, dated November 14, 2007 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on March 12, 2008).

4.12

Amendment to the Agreement Executed between the Registrant and the São Paulo City government, dated February 10, 2008 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on May 12, 2008).

4.14

The Audit Committee Charter dated February 11, 2010 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on April 20, 2010).

4.15

Convention between the State and the city of São Paulo, dated June 23, 2010, with the intermediation and consent of the Registrant and of the ARSESP (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on July 13, 2010).

4.16

Contract to provide public water supply and sewage services, among the Registrant, the State and the city of São Paulo, dated June 23, 2010 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on July 13, 2010).

11.1

Code of Ethics and Conduct dated January 26, 2006 (English Translation) (incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed on July 7, 2008).

12.1

Certification of Dilma Seli Pena, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

12.2

Certification of Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

13.1

Certification of Dilma Seli Pena, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

13.2

Certification of Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

15.1

Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes to the SEC, dated May 15, 2013 regarding the change in independent public accounting firm.

150



SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F20‑F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

1.         COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BÁSICO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - SABESP

2.         By:        /s/ Dilma Seli Pena                                 
Name:    Dilma Seli Pena
Title:       Chief Executive Officer

3.         By:        /s/ Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso        
Name:    Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso
Title:       Chief Financial Officer and Investor
                Relations Officer

Date:  April 27, 2012May 15, 2013

 

 




 

 

Companhia de Saneamento
Básico do Estado de São Paulo -
SABESP

IFRS Consolidated Financial Statements

as of December 31, 2012 and 2011

and for the years ended

December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

 

F-1

 


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM,
ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                        

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Companhia de Saneamento Básico
do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

Amounts in thousands of reais

[NEW REPORTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS]

*          *          *


Companhia de Saneamento Básico
do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

Amounts in thousands of reais

F-3


Companhia de Saneamento
Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
SABESP
São Paulo - SP

IFRS Consolidated Financial Statements

as of and for the years ended

December 31, 2011 and 2010


 

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The managementWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP ("Company” or “SABESP"(the “Company”) is responsibleas of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for establishing and maintaining effective internal control overthe year ended December 31, 2012. These financial reporting and for its assessmentstatements are the responsibility of the effectivenessCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the U.S. Exchange Act Rule.

The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Company's Board of Directors, Audit Committee, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Therefore even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - COSO. Basedand our report dated May 15, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on that assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2011, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. As a result of this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were both designed and effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2011.reporting.

 

The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

 

_________________________São Paulo, Brazil

/S/ Dilma Seli Pena

Chief Executive Officer

March 23, 2012May 15, 2013

 

_________________________

/s/ Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso

Chief Financial Officer and

Investor Relations Officer

March 23, 2012

F-2



 

Report of Independent Registeredindependent registered
public accounting firm

Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do
Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of two years in the period ended December 31, 2011 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

at December 31, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2011in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and International Standards of Auditing. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

São Paulo, Brazil

March 23, 2012May 15, 2013

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers


Auditores Independentes


F-3


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Consolidated Balance Sheetsas of December 31, 20112012 and 20102011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise indicated)

 

 

 

 

December

 

December

 

 

 

 

 

December

 

December

Assets

Note

 

31, 2012

 

31, 2011

 

Liabilities and equity

 

Note

 

31, 2012

 

31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

5

 

1,921,178

 

2,149,989

 

Trade payable and contractors

 

 

 

297,198

 

255,557

Restricted cash

6

 

64,977

 

99,733

 

Services payable

 

18

 

389,091

 

383,116

Trade receivables

7

 

1,043,166

 

1,072,659

 

Current portion of long-term loans and financing

 

13

 

1,367,391

 

1,630,010

Receivable from related parties

8

 

109,273

 

185,333

 

Accrued payroll and related charges

 

 

 

267,863

 

243,876

Inventories

 

 

53,090

 

44,611

 

Taxes payable

 

14

 

153,121

 

181,122

Recoverable taxes

 

129,141

 

118,116

Interest on shareholders' equity payable

 

 

 

414,355

 

247,486

Other receivables

 

 

16,040

 

55,392

 

Provisions

 

16

 

565,083

 

764,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public Private Partnership – PPP

 

 

 

24,357

 

12,693

Total current assets

 

 

3,336,865

 

3,725,833

 

Program contracts commitments

 

 

 

148,220

 

62,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

170,691

 

188,451

Noncurrent assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade receivables

7

 

335,687

 

333,713

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

3,797,370

 

3,968,668

Receivable from related parties

8

 

153,098

 

170,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indemnities receivable

9

 

-

 

60,295

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Escrow deposits

 

 

53,158

 

54,178

 

Loans and financing

 

13

 

7,701,929

 

6,966,285

Deferred income tax and social contribution

15

 

141,356

 

179,463

 

Taxes payable

 

14

 

-

 

18,363

Investments property

11

 

54,046

 

52,585

 

Accrued taxes on revenues

 

 

 

125,404

 

114,957

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

16

 

624,074

 

807,759

Intangible assets

10

 

21,991,922

 

20,141,677

 

Pension obligations

 

17

 

2,124,330

 

2,050,697

Property, plant and equipment

12

 

383,383

 

356,468

 

Public Private Partnership – PPP

 

 

 

331,960

 

416,105

Other receivables

 

 

226,278

 

140,484

 

Program contracts commitments

 

 

 

87,407

 

130,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

167,742

 

195,276

Total noncurrent assets

 

 

23,338,928

 

21,489,151

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

11,162,846

 

10,700,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

14,960,216

 

14,669,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock

 

 

 

6,203,688

 

6,203,688

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital reserve

 

 

 

124,255

 

124,255

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings reserves

 

 

 

5,387,634

 

4,217,953

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

 

 

11,715,577

 

10,545,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

 

26,675,793

 

25,214,984

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

 

 

26,675,793

 

25,214,984

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

 

December

 

 

 

 

 

December

 

December

Assets

Note

 

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

 

Liabilities and equity

 

Note

 

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

5

 

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

 

 

 

255,557

 

144,043

Restricted cash

6

 

99,729

 

302,570

 

Services payable

 

 

 

383,116

 

295,172

Customer accounts receivable, net

7

 

1,072,659

 

971,318

 

Current portion of long-term loans and financing

 

12

 

1,630,010

 

1,242,143

Accounts receivable from related party, net

8

 

185,333

 

137,772

 

Accrued payroll and related charges

 

 

 

243,876

 

246,467

Inventories

 

 

44,611

 

36,096

 

Other taxes payable

 

13

 

181,122

 

158,050

Taxes recoverable

 

 

118,116

 

108,675

 

Interest on shareholders' equity payable

 

 

 

247,486

 

354,254

Other assets

 

 

55,396

 

44,511

 

Provisions

 

15

 

764,070

 

766,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

263,431

 

299,382

Total current assets

 

 

3,725,833

 

3,590,121

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

3,968,668

 

3,506,114

Noncurrent assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer accounts receivable, net

7

 

333,713

 

352,839

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable from related party, net

8

 

170,288

 

231,076

 

Loans and financing

 

12

 

6,966,285

 

7,022,472

Indemnities receivable

9

 

60,295

 

146,213

 

Other taxes payable

 

13

 

18,363

 

53,045

Escrow deposits

 

 

54,178

 

43,543

 

Accrued taxes on revenues

 

 

 

114,957

 

112,962

Deferred income taxes

14

 

179,463

 

78,440

 

Provisions

 

15

 

807,759

 

693,227

Investments property

 

 

52,585

 

-

 

Pension obligations

 

16

 

2,050,697

 

1,804,038

Intangible assets, net

10

 

20,141,677

 

18,546,836

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

742,359

 

476,926

Property, plant and equipment, net

11

 

356,468

 

249,606

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

140,484

 

111,910

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

10,700,420

 

10,162,670

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total noncurrent assets

 

 

21,489,151

 

19,760,463

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

14,669,088

 

13,668,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock

 

 

 

6,203,688

 

6,203,688

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital reserve

 

 

 

124,255

 

124,255

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings reserves and retained earnings

 

 

 

4,217,953

 

3,353,857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

 

 

10,545,896

 

9,681,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

 

25,214,984

 

23,350, 584

 

Total equity and liabilities

 

 

 

25,214,984

 

23,350,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-11F-4



 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

ConsolidatedIncome Statements of Incomefor the

Years Endedended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise indicatedindicated)

 

 

Note

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

Note

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services

20

 

9,941,637

 

9,231,027

 

8,579,519

Net operating revenue

22

 

10,754,435

 

9,941,637

 

9,231,027

Cost of sales and services

21

 

(6,030,977)

 

(5,194,548)

 

(5,087,254)

23

 

(6,465,398)

 

(6,030,977)

 

(5,194,548)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

3,910,660

 

4,036,479

 

3,492,265

 

 

4,289,037

 

3,910,660

 

4,036,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling expenses

21

 

(619,542)

 

(712,946)

 

(610,422)

23

 

(697,874)

 

(619,542)

 

(712,946)

Administrative expenses

21

 

(846,593)

 

(653,200)

 

(717,100)

23

 

(726,128)

 

(846,593)

 

(653,200)

Other operating income (expenses), net

23

 

(90,138)

 

1,830

 

(44,425)

25

 

(19,775)

 

(90,138)

 

1,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating profit

 

 

2,354,387

 

2,672,163

 

2,120,318

 

 

2,845,260

 

2,354,387

 

2,672,163

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial expenses

22

 

(702,766)

 

(789,467)

 

(765,197)

24

 

(582,822)

 

(702,766)

 

(789,467)

Financial income

22

 

465,926

 

343,914

 

226,782

24

 

332,041

 

465,926

 

343,914

Inflation adjustment and foreign exchange result, net

22

 

(396,801)

 

66,146

 

528,449

Foreign exchange result, net

24

 

(50,575)

 

(396,801)

 

66,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing cost, net

 

 

(633,641)

 

(379,407)

 

(9,966)

Financial income (expenses), net

 

 

(301,356)

 

(633,641)

 

(379,407)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Profit before income tax and social contribution

 

 

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

 

2,110,352

 

 

2,543,904

 

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

Income tax and social contribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

14

 

(598,303)

 

(697,115)

 

(748,708)

15

 

(594,052)

 

(598,303)

 

(697,115)

Deferred

14

 

100,976

 

34,806

 

146,103

15

 

(37,952)

 

100,976

 

34,806

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(497,327)

 

(662,309)

 

(602,605)

 

 

(632,004)

 

(497,327)

 

(662,309)

Net income for the year

attributable to the Company's shareholders

 

 

 

1,223,419

 

 

1,630,447

 

1,507,747

 

 

 

1,911,900

 

 

1,223,419

 

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share - basic and diluted (inreais)

18

 

5.37

 

7.16

 

6.62

20

 

2.80

 

1.79

 

2.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per ADS - basic and diluted (inreais)

20

 

2.80

 

1.79

 

2.39

 

 

The Company does not have cumulative comprehensive income; therefore, the statement of comprehensive income has not been presented in the consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Statements of Changes in EquityComprehensive Income for the

as ofYears ended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010, and 20092010

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise indicatedindicated)

 

Note

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

1,911,900

 

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

Total comprehensive income for the year

 

 

1,911,900

 

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attributable to owners of the parent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings reserves

 

 

 

 

 

Note

 

Capital stock

 

Capital reserve

 

Legal reserve

 

Investments reserve

 

Additional

proposed dividend

 

Retained

earnings (losses)

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2008

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

309,832

 

687,219

 

-

 

-

 

7,324,994

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,507,747

 

1,507,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,507,747

 

1,507,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transactions with owners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserve

17(e)

 

-

 

-

 

68,694

 

-

 

-

 

(68,694)

 

-

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$ 1.73 per share)

17(c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(394,157)

 

(394,157)

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,044,896

 

-

 

(1,044,896) 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

68,694

 

1,044,896

 

-

 

(1,507,747)

 

(394,157)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2009

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

378,526

 

1,732,115

 

-

 

-

 

8,438,584

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,630,447

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,630,447

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transactions with owners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserves

17 (e)

 

-

 

-

 

81,522

 

-

 

-

 

(81,522)

 

-

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$ 1.70 per share)

17 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(387,231)

 

(387,231)

Additional proposed dividends

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

68,761

 

(68,761)

 

-

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,092,933

 

-

 

(1,092,933)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

81,522

 

1,092,933

 

68,761

 

1,630,447

 

(387,231)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2010

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

460,048

 

2,825,048

 

68,761

 

-

 

9,681,800

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,223,419

 

1,223,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,223,419

 

1,223,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transactions with owners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserves

17 (e)

 

-

 

-

 

61,171

 

-

 

-

 

(61,171)

 

-

Distributed dividends of 2010

17 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(68,761)

 

-

 

(68,761)

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$ 1.27 per share)

17 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(290,562)

 

(290,562)

Additional proposed dividends

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

288,143

 

(288,143)

 

-

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

583,543

 

-

 

(583,543)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

61,171

 

583,543

 

288,143

 

1,223,419

 

(373,917)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

521,219

 

3,408,591

 

288,143

 

-

 

10,545,896

                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsChanges in Equity for the

Years Endedended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010, and 20092010

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise indicatedindicated)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings reserves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Retained

 

 

 

Note

 

Capital stock

 

Capital reserve

 

Legal reserve

 

Investments reserve

 

proposed dividend

 

earnings (losses)

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2009

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

378,526

 

1,732,115

 

-

 

-

 

8,438,584

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,630,447

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,630,447

 

1,630,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserves

19 (e)

 

-

 

-

 

81,522

 

-

 

-

 

(81,522)

 

-

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$0.57 per share)

19 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(387,231)

 

(387,231)

Additional proposed dividends

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

68,761

 

(68,761)

 

-

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,092,933

 

-

 

(1,092,933)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

81,522

 

1,092,933

 

68,761

 

(1,630,447)

 

(387,231)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2010

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

460,048

 

2,825,048

 

68,761

 

-

 

9,681,800

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,223,419

 

1,223,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,223,419

 

1,223,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserves

19 (e)

 

-

 

-

 

61,171

 

-

 

-

 

(61,171)

 

-

Distributed dividends of 2010, approved (R$0.10 per share)

19 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(68,761)

 

-

 

(68,761)

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$0.43 per share)

19 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(290,562)

 

(290,562)

Additional proposed dividends

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

288,143

 

(288,143)

 

-

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

583,543

 

-

 

(583,543)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

61,171

 

583,543

 

219,382

 

(1,223,419)

 

(359,323)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2011

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

521,219

 

3,408,591

 

288,143

 

-

 

10,545,896

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,911,900

 

1,911,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,911,900

 

1,911,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to legal reserves

19 (e)

 

-

 

-

 

95,595

 

-

 

-

 

(95,595)

 

-

Distributed dividends of 2011, approved (R$0.42 per share)

19 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(288,143)

 

-

 

(288,143)

Interest on shareholders' equity (R$0.66 per share)

19 (c)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(454,076)

 

(454,076)

Additional proposed dividends

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

80,201

 

(80,201)

 

-

Allocation to investments reserve

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,282,028

 

-

 

(1,282,028)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transactions with owners

 

 

-

 

-

 

95,595

 

1,282,028

 

(207,942)

 

(1,911,900)

 

(742,219)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2012

 

 

6,203,688

 

124,255

 

616,814

 

4,690,619

 

80,201

 

-

 

11,715,577

 

 

 

Note

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Profit before income tax and social contribution

 

 

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

 

2,110,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

768,769

 

552,184

 

562,236

Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

 

 

56,548

 

16,385

 

23,372

Allowance for doubtful accounts expense

 

 

289,589

 

402,694

 

308,188

Change in provisions

 

 

614,993

 

352,614

 

596,543

Interest on loans and financing

 

 

439,117

 

450,297

 

395,897

Foreign exchange and monetary (gains) losses on loans and financing

 

 

442,954

 

21,139

 

(535,409)

Indemnities Receivable

 

 

85,918

 

-

 

-

Interest and inflation adjustment gains

 

 

(2,167)

 

(55,804)

 

(14,252)

Provision from São Paulo agreement

 

 

15,386

 

80,368

 

-

Provision for defined contribution plan

 

 

(8,746)

 

32,587

 

-

Fair value margin on intangible assets arising from concession contracts

 

 

(47,589)

 

(49,603)

 

(30,145)

Other adjustments

 

 

4,833

 

19,331

 

8,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted net income

 

 

4,380,351

 

4,114,948

 

3,424,979

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer accounts receivable

 

 

(358,516)

 

(245,683)

 

(285,854)

Accounts receivable from related party

 

 

20,455

 

36,708

 

91,547

Inventories

 

 

(8,519)

 

3,484

 

6,758

Taxes recoverable

 

 

(62,149)

 

(157,916)

 

(24,491)

Indemnities receivable

 

 

-

 

-

 

2,581

Escrow deposits

 

 

573

 

(14,864)

 

(34,009)

Other assets

 

 

(43,025)

 

(30,508)

 

3,444

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

 

 

145,451

 

(66,087)

 

(15,249)

Services payable

 

 

87,944

 

55,678

 

48,533

Accrued payroll and related charges

 

 

(49,582)

 

(17,525)

 

43,077

Other taxes payable

 

 

(14,649)

 

(8,316)

 

(19,505)

Accrued taxes on revenues

 

 

1,995

 

(7,455)

 

(8,792)

Provisions

 

 

(197,521)

 

(330,256)

 

(240,032)

Pension obligations

 

 

(11,268)

 

(15,881)

 

88,549

Other liabilities

 

 

150,855

 

118,774

 

190,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities

 

 

(337,956)

 

(679,847)

 

(153,166)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash generated from operations

 

 

4,042,395

 

3,435,101

 

3,271,813

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-7



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the

Years Endedended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010, and 20092010

Amounts in thousands of reais unless otherwise indicated

(Continued)

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise indicated)                                                                                                           

 

 

 

Note

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash generated from operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

 

(736,853)

 

(618,600)

 

(555,573)

Income tax and social contribution paid

 

 

(588,484)

 

(733,452)

 

(643,788)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash generated from operating activities

 

 

2,717,058

 

2,083,049

 

2,072,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash

 

 

202,841

 

(189,820)

 

(10,748)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(143,684)

 

(87,383)

 

(9,347)

Purchases of intangible assets

 

 

(2,067,435)

 

(1,814,166)

 

(1,973,096)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

 

-

 

-

 

29,161

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(2,008,278)

 

(2,091,369)

 

(1,964,030)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from borrowings

 

 

1,854,052

 

3,425,417

 

2,237,056

Repayments of borrowings

 

 

(1,979,099)

 

(1,800,507)

 

(1,896,480)

Payment of interest on shareholders' equity

 

 

(422,923)

 

(398,419)

 

(303,722)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(547,970)

 

1,226,491

 

36,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

160,810

 

1,218,171

 

145,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

5

 

1,989,179

 

771,008

 

625,732

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

5

 

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

771,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

160,810

 

1,218,171

 

145,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other charges capitalized

 

 

261,886

 

228,899

 

51,625

 

Note

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Profit before income tax and social contribution

 

 

2,543,904

 

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

Adjustments for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

740,147

 

768,769

 

552,184

Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

 

 

12,059

 

56,548

 

16,385

Allowance for doubtful accounts and losses due to supply at wholesale

 

 

401,576

 

289,589

 

402,694

Provision and inflation adjustment

 

 

201,196

 

310,075

 

352,614

Interest on loans and financing

 

 

406,254

 

439,117

 

450,297

Inflation adjustment and exchange gains (losses) on loans and financing

 

 

85,122

 

442,954

 

21,139

Indemnities Receivable

 

 

60,295

 

85,918

 

-

Interest and inflation adjustment losses

 

 

24,553

 

31,422

 

4,112

Interest and inflation adjustment gains

 

 

(12,862)

 

(33,589)

 

(59,916)

Financial charges from customers

 

 

(171,481)

 

(169,941)

 

(178,996)

Provision for Consent Decree (TAC)

 

 

57,332

 

46,991

 

24,840

Provision for São Paulo agreement

 

 

2,466

 

15,386

 

80,368

Provision for defined contribution plan

 

 

5,728

 

(8,746)

 

32,587

Pension obligations

 

 

213,747

 

257,927

 

(11,834)

Margin on intangible assets construction related concession contracts

 

 

(50,815)

 

(47,589)

 

(49,603)

Other adjustments

 

 

34,772

 

4,833

 

6,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade receivable

 

 

(156,914)

 

(188,575)

 

(66,687)

Receivable from related parties

 

 

60,450

 

20,455

 

36,708

Inventories

 

 

(8,885)

 

(8,519)

 

3,484

Recoverable taxes

 

 

(40,564)

 

(62,149)

 

(157,916)

Escrow deposits

 

 

1,020

 

573

 

(14,864)

Other receivables

 

 

(53,579)

 

(43,025)

 

(30,508)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade payables and contractors

 

 

(25,991)

 

145,451

 

(66,087)

Services payable

 

 

5,975

 

87,944

 

55,678

Accrued payroll and related charges

 

 

(33,345)

 

(49,582)

 

(17,525)

Taxes payable

 

 

(47,717)

 

(14,649)

 

(8,316)

Accrued taxes on revenues

 

 

10,602

 

1,995

 

(7,455)

Provisions

 

 

(583,868)

 

(197,521)

 

(330,256)

Pension obligations

 

 

(140,115)

 

(11,268)

 

(15,881)

Other liabilities

 

 

(53,488)

 

150,855

 

118,774

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash generated from operations

 

 

3,487,574

 

4,042,395

 

3,435,101

Interest paid

 

 

(590,196)

 

(736,853)

 

(618,600)

Income tax and social contribution paid

 

 

(561,158)

 

(588,484)

 

(733,452)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash generated from operating activities

 

 

2,336,220

 

2,717,058

 

2,083,049

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash

 

 

34,752

 

202,841

 

(189,820)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(30,647)

 

(143,684)

 

(87,383)

Purchases of intangible assets

 

 

(2,002,883)

 

(2,067,435)

 

(1,814,166)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(1,998,778)

 

(2,008,278)

 

(2,091,369)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from loans

 

 

1,627,249

 

1,854,052

 

3,425,417

Repayments of loans

 

 

(1,518,240)

 

(1,979,099)

 

(1,800,507)

Payment of interest on shareholders' equity

 

 

(578,705)

 

(422,923)

 

(398,419)

Public private partnership – PPP

 

 

(40,285)

 

-

 

-

Program Contracts Commitments

 

 

(56,272)

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(566,253)

 

(547,970)

 

1,226,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) / Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(228,811)

 

160,810

 

1,218,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

5

 

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

771,008

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

5

 

1,921,178

 

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) / Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(228,811)

 

160,810

 

1,218,171

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-8


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

1Operations            General information

 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo ("SABESP" or the "Company") is a mixed-capital company headquartered in São Paulo, at Rua Costa Carvalho, 300, CEP 05429-900, controlled by the São Paulo State Government.The Company is engaged in the provision of basic and environmental sanitation services in the State of São Paulo, andas well as it supplies treated water on a wholesale basis.

 

In addition to providing basic sanitation services in the State of São Paulo, SABESP may perform these activities in other states and countries, and can operate in drainage, urban cleaning, solid waste handling and energy markets. The objective set in the new vision of SABESP is to be recognized as the company that ensured universal access to water and sewage services in its marketplace, focused on the customer, and in a sustainable and competitive manner, with excellence in environmental solutions.

 

OnAs of December 31, 2011,2012, the company operatesCompany operated water and sewage services in 363 of municipalities of the State of São Paulo, having temporarily discontinued operations in the municipalities of Araçoiaba da Serra, Iperó, Cajobi, Alvaro Florense and Macatuba, due to judicial orders under ongoing lawsuits.Paulo. Most of these municipalities operations are based on 30-year concession agreements.

SABESP is temporarily not operating in some municipalities due to judicial orders under ongoing lawsuits: Iperó, Cajobi, Álvares Florense and Macatuba, the carrying amount of these municipalities' intangible assets was R$16,516 as of December 31, 2012 (R$12,929 as of December 31, 2011).

As of December 31, 2011, 992012, 67 concessions had expired and are being negotiated. From 20122013 to 2033, 392034, 38 concessions will expire, and the remaining concessions operate on rollover basis. These concessions with indefinite terms and expired concessions under negotiation are amortized over the useful lives of the underlying assets. By December 31, 2011, the concession program contracts signed totaled 225 (2010 - 201 concession program contracts).

expire. Management believes that all concessions expired and not yet renewed will result in new contracts, or contract extensions. Therefore,disregarding the risk of discontinuity in the provision of municipal water supply and sewage services was considered remote by Management. services. By December 31, 2012, 258 program and metropolitan contracts were signed (225 contracts on December 31, 2011).

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the carrying amount of the underlying assets used in the 9967 concessions of the municipalities under negotiation totaled R$ 6,5885,874 million, which represents 32.44%accounting for 26.71% of the total, intangible assets and the related gross revenue for the year then ended totaled R$ 2,5132,123 million, which represents 23.87%accounting for 18.61% of the total gross revenue.total.

 

The Company's operations are concentrated in the municipality of São Paulo, which represents 55.1%54.7% of the gross revenues in 2012 (55.1% in 2011 (54.7%and 54.7% in 2010) and 43.5% of intangible assets (45.6% in 2011).

 

On June 23, 2010, the State of São Paulo, the Municipality of São Paulo, the Company and the Companyregulatory agency “Sanitation and Energy Regulatory Agency – ARSESP” signed an agreement to share the responsibility for water supply and sewage services to the Municipality of São Paulo based on a 30-year concession agreement. This agreement is extendable for another 30 years.years, pursuant to the law. This agreement sets forth SABESP as the exclusive service provider and designates Agência Reguladora de Saneamento e Energia  (“ARSESP”)ARSESP as regulator, establishing prices, controlling and monitoring services.

 

Also, on June 23, 2010, the State of São Paulo, the city of São Paulo and SABESP signed the “Public service provision agreement of water supply and sewage services”, a 30-year concession agreement which is extendable for another 30 years. This agreement involves the following activities:

 

(i)F-9


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

i. protection of the sources of water in collaboration with other agencies of the State and the City;

(ii)ii. capture, transport and treat of water;

(iii)iii. collect, transport, treatment and final dispose of  sanitary sewage; and

(iv)iv. adoption of other actions of basic and environmental sanitation.

 

F-16


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated


In the municipality of Santos, in the Baixada SantistaSantos coast region, which has a significant population, the Company operates under an authorization by public deed, a situation similar to other municipalities in that region and in the Ribeira valley, where the Company started to operate after the merger of the companies that formed it. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of the municipality of Santos’ intangible assets was R$328,693 (R$175,069 in December 2011) and its gross revenue was R$202,103 (R$196,831 in December 2011 and R$182,511 in 2010).

 

On January 5, 2007,Article 58 of Law 11,445 was enacted, establishing11445/07 establishes that precarious and expired concessions, as well as those effective for an undetermined period of time, including those that do not have an instrument formalizing them, will be valid until December 31, 2010. However, Article 2 of Law 12693 of July 24, 2012 allows program agreements to be executed until December 31, 2016.

The Company’s management understands that the basic sanitation regulatory framework, providing forconcession agreements not yet renewed are valid and are governed by Laws 8987/95 and 11445/07, including those municipalities served without an agreement.

Public deeds are valid and governed by the nationwide guidelines and basic principles for the provision of such services, such as social control, transparency, the integration authority of sanitation infrastructure, water resources management, and the articulation between industry policies and public policies for urban and regional development, housing, suppression of poverty, promotion of health and environmental protection, and other related issues.Brazilian Civil Code.

 

The Company's shares have been listed in theNovo Mercado(New Market) segment of BM&FBOVESPA (the São Paulo Stock Exchange) since April 2002 and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) as American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) since May 2002.

 

Since 2008, the Company has been entering in joint venturesetting up partnerships with other companies, resultingwhich resulted in the following companies: Sesamm, Águas de Andradina, Saneaqua Mairinque, Aquapolo Ambiental, Águas de Castilho eand Attend Ambiental. However,Although SABESP is nothas no majority interest in the majority stockholdercapital stock of thosethese companies, and the agreement of stockholder consider ashareholders’ agreements provide for the power of veto and a qualitycasting vote to SABESP, in some subjects,certain issues jointly with others stockholders,associates, indicating jointhe shared control in strategic decisions over those companies. Thosethe management of investees. For the purposes of accounting classification in the financial statements, these companies are considered “joint controlled entities” according to IAS 31.joint ventures.

 

TheseThe financial statements were approved by the Board of DirectorsManagement on March 22, 2012.May 15, 2013.

 

2Summary of Significant Accounting Practices

 

2.1      Basis of preparationPreparation and Presentation of the Financial Statements

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in complianceaccordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented.

 

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost except for certain financial instruments which were measured at fair value according to IFRS.

 

F-10


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree to judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are described in Note 4.

 

2.2      Proportional consolidationConsolidated financial statements

 

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its investees: Sesamm – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S/A, Águas de Andradina, S.A., Saneaqua Mairinque S.A., Aquapolo Ambiental S.A., Attend Ambiental e Águas de Castilho, Saneaqua Mairinque, Aquapolo Ambiental and Attend Ambiental, which were proportionallyproportionately consolidated according to the equity interestinterests held in these investees.


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

The Company has no majority shares of its investees, but according toinvestees’ By-Laws approvals of any subject by shareholders in general meeting, except for the approval of any subject mentioned in theinvestees’ By-Laws, which relates to decisions that affect financial and operational policies, for example, approval of the business plan, will be made by a majority vote, and SABESP has power of veto.

For the purposes of calculating the Company's proportional share of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of its investees, unrealized gains or transactions between the Company and its investees were eliminated in proportion to the Company's interest; unrealized losses are also eliminated, unless the transaction presents evidence of impairment of the transferred asset. The accounting policies applied by theof its investees are consistent with the accounting policies adopted by the Company. The Company shares the control of its investees, which have the same fiscal year basis. The consolidation processes of assets, liabilities and income statements add the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, according to the nature, by applying the percentage of the Company’s interest held in each investee.

Although SABESP has no majority shares of its investees, the shareholders’ agreement provides for the power of veto in certain management issues, indicating participating shared control. Therefore, the financial statements were proportionately consolidated.

The following entities were consolidated proportionately:

 

Sesamm

 

On August 15, 2008, the Company, together with the companies OHL Médio Ambiente, Inima S.A.U. Unipersonal ("Inima"), Técnicas y Gestión Medioambiental S.A.U. ("TGM") and Estudos Técnicos e Projetos ETEP Ltda. ("ETEP") incorporated the company Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S.A. - SESAMM ("SESAMM"), for a period of 30 years from the date the concession agreement with the municipality of Mogi Mirim for the purpose of providing complementary services to the sewage diversion system and implementing and operating sewage treatment system in the municipality of Mogi Mirim, including the disposal of solid waste.

 

SESAMM's capital as of December 31, 2011 and 2010,2012 totaled R$19,532, and was represented by 19,532,409 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 36% of its equity interest and Inima holds another 46% of its equity interest. The Company concluded that both, SABESP and Inima, have joint control over SESAMM. Accordingly, SABESP records their interest over SESAMM applying the proportional consolidation method, equivalent to the 36% of SESAMM's assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses.

 

As of December 31, 2011, SESAMM´s operations had not beenOperations started yet.in June 2012.

 

Águas de Andradina

 

On September 15, 2010, the Company, together with the company Companhia de Águas do Brasil – Cab Ambiental incorporated the company Águas de Andradina S.A., with indefinite term, for the purpose of providing water supply and sewage services to the municipality of Andradina.

 

OnAs of December 31, 2011,2012, the capital of Águas de Andradina totaled R$2,908, and was represented by 2,908,085 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 30%of its equity interest.

 

The operations

F-11


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Operations started in October 2010.

Águas de Castilho

On October 29, 2010, the Company, together with the Companhia de Águas do Brasil – Cab Ambiental, incorporated the company Águas de Castilho, for the purpose of providing water supply and sewage services to the municipality of Castilho.

As of December 31, 2012, the company’s capital was R$622, and was represented by 622,160 registered share without par value. SABESP holds 30% equity interest.

Operations started in January 2011.

 

Saneaqua Mairinque

 

On June 14, 2010, the Company, together with the company Foz do Brasil S.A. incorporated the company Saneaqua Mairinque S.A., with indefinite term, for the purpose of exploring the public service of water supply and sewage services to the municipality of Mairinque.

 

OnAs of December 31, 2011,2012, the capital of Saneaqua Mairinque totaled R$2,000, and was represented by 2,000,000 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 30%of its equity interest.


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

The operations initiatedOperations started in October 2010.

 

Aquapolo Ambiental S.A.

 

On October 8, 2009, the Company, together with the company Foz do Brasil S.A. incorporated the company Aquapolo Ambiental S.A., for the purpose of producing, providing and commercializing of reused water.water for Quattor Química S.A., Quattor Petriquímica S.A., Quattor Participações S.A. and other companies comprising the Petrochemical Complex.

 

OnAs of December 31, 2011,2012, the capital of Aquapolo totaled R$36,412, and was represented by 42,419,045 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 49%of its equity interest.

 

The operations are expected to initiateOperations started in AprilOctober 2012.

Águas de Castilho

On October 29, 2010, the Company, together with the company Águas do Brasil – Cab Ambiental, incorporated the company Águas de Castilho, for the purpose of providing water supply and sewage services to the municipality of Castilho.

The capital of Águas de Castilho totaled R$ 622, and was represented by 622,160 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 30%of its equity interest.

The operations initiated in January 2011.

 

Attend Ambiental

 

On August 23, 2010 the Company and Companhia Estre Ambiental S.A, incorporated the company Attend Ambiental S.A, for constructing and operating a pretreatment of non domesticnon-domestic effluent station, mud transportation and related services in the cityMetropolitan area of São Paulo city as well as implement similar structures in other areasinareas in Brazil and abroad.

 

TheAs of December 31, 2012, the capital totaled R$2,000, and it iswas represented by 2,000,000 registered shares without a par value. SABESP holds 45%of its equity interest. A total of R$11,400 was recorded under the investee’s equity as advance for future capital increase.

 

The operations initiated in January 2011.Attend is at startup stage and startup is scheduled for September 2013.

 

See below a summary of financial information of the joint-controlledjoint controlled entities:

F-19

F-12


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

 

 

2011

 

 

Sesamm

Águas de Andradina

Águas de Castilho

Saneaqua Mairinque

Aguapolo Ambiental

Attend Ambiental

 

 

36%

30%

30%

30%

49%

45%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

2,658

360

133

561

12,424

5,003

Non-current assets

 

14,447

1,300

423

164

180,717

223

Current liabilities

 

832

815

256

228

10,262

127

Non-current liabilities

 

11,120

84

47

28

167,498

5,130

Stockholders’ equity

 

5,153

761

253

469

15,381

(31)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenue

 

9,203

2,985

651

2,498

-

-

Operating expenses

 

(10,494)

(2,954)

(568)

(2,730)

(1,438)

(992)

Financial income, net

 

115

31

5

44

-

60

Profit (loss) for the year

 

(1,176)

62

88

(188)

(1,438)

(932)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

Sesamm

Águas de Andradina

Saneaqua Mairinque

Aguapolo Ambiental

 

 

36%

30%

30%

49%

Current assets

 

420

178

851

13,798

Non-current assets

 

5,353

106

10

46,094

Current liabilities

 

2,702

119

177

1,331

Non-current liabilities

 

-

301

9

53,909

Stockholders’ equity

 

3,071

(136)

675

4,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenue

 

-

247

447

-

Operating expenses

 

(638)

(451)

(384)

(1.023)

Financial income, net

 

95

-

12

-

Profit (loss) for the year

 

(543)

(204)

75

(1.023)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.3 

Segment reporting

 

2012

 

SESAMM 36%

ÁGUAS DE ANDRADINA 30%

ÁGUAS DE CASTILHO 30%

SANEAQUA MAIRINQUE 30%

AQUAPOLO AMBIENTAL 49%

ATTEND AMBIENTAL 45%

Current assets

875

2,199

404

414

15,247

1,976

Noncurrent assets

19,609

3,934

904

858

181,749

2,570

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

822

4,777

868

272

32,304

167

Noncurrent liabilities

13,902

555

77

15

157,047

-

Equity

5,760

801

363

985

7,645

4,379

 

2011

 

SESAMM 36%

ÁGUAS DE ANDRADINA 30%

ÁGUAS DE CASTILHO 30%

SANEAQUA MAIRINQUE 30%

AQUAPOLO AMBIENTAL 49%

ATTEND AMBIENTAL 45%

Current assets

2,658

360

133

561

12,424

5,003

Noncurrent assets

14,447

1,300

423

164

180,717

223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

832

815

256

228

10,262

127

Noncurrent liabilities

11,120

84

47

28

167,498

5,130

Equity

5,153

761

253

469

15,381

(31)

 

2012

 

SESAMM 36%

ÁGUAS DE ANDRADINA 30%

ÁGUAS DE CASTILHO 30%

SANEAQUA MAIRINQUE 30%

AQUAPOLO AMBIENTAL 49%

ATTEND AMBIENTAL 45%

Operating revenue

9,364

4,611

1,336

2,931

3,249

-

Operating expenses

(8,775)

(4,747)

(1,203)

(2,715)

(10,118)

(1,057)

Financial income, net

85

104

22

19

26

336

Net income (loss) for the year

674

(32)

155

235

(6,843)

(721)

 

IFRS 8 requires that segment report is identified based in internal reporting regularly reviewed by decision-maker in order to define the allocation of resources and evaluate performances.

 

2011

 

SESAMM 36%

ÁGUAS DE ANDRADINA 30%

ÁGUAS DE CASTILHO 30%

SANEAQUA MAIRINQUE 30%

AQUAPOLO AMBIENTAL 49%

ATTEND AMBIENTAL 45%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenue

9,203

2,985

651

2,498

-

-

Operating expenses

(10,494)

(2,954)

(568)

(2,730)

(1,438)

(992)

Financial income, net

115

31

5

44

-

60

Net income (loss) for the year

(1,176)

62

88

(188)

(1,438)

(932)

 

2010

 

SESAMM 36%

ÁGUAS DE ANDRADINA 30%

SANEAQUA MAIRINQUE 30%

AQUAPOLO AMBIENTAL 49%

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenue

-

247

447

-

Operating expenses

(638)

(451)

(384)

(1.023)

Financial income, net

95

-

12

-

Net income (loss) for the year

(543) 

(204)

75

(1.023)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Executive Board that makes strategic decisions.F-13

   

Based in the manner that the Company defines the allocation of resources, two operating segments (water and sewage services) are presented on note 19.

2.4Translation into foreign currency

(a)         Functional and reporting currency

F-20


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Items included in the financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the company operates ("the functional currency"). The financial statements are presented in Brazilianreais (R$ or reais), which is also the Company's functional and presentation currency. All financial information presented has been presented in reais, except where indicated.

 

(b)         Foreign currency translation2.3Cash and cash equivalents

 

Foreign currency-denominated transactions are translated into Brazilianreais usingCash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, bank deposits, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities less than three months as from the exchange rates prevailing at the transaction dates. Balance sheet accounts are translated at the exchange rateprevailing at balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses arising on the settlementinvestment date, with an insignificant risk of these transactions and the translation of foreign currency-denominated cash assets and liabilities are recognized in Foreign exchange result in the statement of income.change value, as well as current account overdrafts.

 

2.52.4      Financial Instrumentsinstruments

 

2.5.1Classification

 

The Company classifies its financial assets according to the following categories: measured at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity and available for sale. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were recognized at fair value and subsequently acquired. Management determines the classification of the financial assets at inception. As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the Company had nodid not have financial assets classified inunder the categoryfair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity and available for sale.available-for-sale financial instruments category.

 

(a)          Financial assets calculated at fair value through profit or loss

 

These are financial assets held for active and frequent trading. FinancialA financial asset is classified ininto this category if it waswhen mainly acquired to be negotiatedfor sale purposes in short-term.the short term. These assets are classified as current assets. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss are presented in the income statement of income in 'Financial income' or 'Financial expenses'expenses’ in the period they occur, unless the instrument has been contracted in connection to another transaction. In this case, changes are recognized in the same line item of income affected by this transaction.

 

(b)          Loans and receivables

 

These comprise receivables which are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments, not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables are presented in current assets or liabilities, except for those with maturity of more than 12 months after the balance sheetstatement of financial position date (these are classified as noncurrent assets or liabilities). The Company's loans and receivables include cash and cash equivalentequivalents, balances of trade accountsreceivables, receivables from related parties, other receivables, indemnities receivable, other accounts receivablereceivables from the Water National Agency – ANA, contractors and loans.suppliers, loans and financing, interest on shareholders’ equity payable, services payable, balances payable from public-private partnership (PPP), and program contract commitments. Loans and receivables are recognizedrecorded at fair value eand subsequently recorded at amortized cost, under the effective interest rate method.

 

2.62.5      Cash and cash equivalentsGross Operating Revenue

 

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three month or less.

2.7F-Revenue from sales and services14

   



��

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

a) 

(a)Revenue from saleswater supply and servicessewage collection

 

Revenue from water supply and sewage collection are recognized as the water is consumed and services are provided. Revenues, including the revenues unbilled, are recognized at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of those services in the ordinary course of the Company’s activities.services. Revenue is shown net of value-added tax, rebates and discounts. Revenues from unbilled represent incurred revenues in which the services were provided, but not yet billed until the end of the each period. Water supply and sewage services are recorded as trade accounts receivablereceivables based on monthly estimates of the completed services.services provided.

 

The Company recognizes revenue when: i) products are delivered or services are rendered; ii) the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, iii) it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Company and iv) it is probable that the amounts will be collected. The amount of revenue is not considered to be reliably measurable until all conditions relating to the sale have been satisfied. Amounts in dispute are recognized as revenue when collected.

 

b)(b)Construction revenue

 

Revenue from concession construction contracts is recognized in accordance with IAS 11 Construction Contracts(Construction Contracts), using the percentage-of-completion method, provided that the applicable conditions for application are fulfilled. The percentage of completion is calculated from the ratio of the actual costs incurred on the balance sheet date to the planned total costs (cost-to-cost method). Revenue from cost plus contracts is recognized by reference to the construction costs incurred during the period plus a fee earned. The fee represents the additional margin related to the work performed by the Company in relation to such construction contracts and it is added to the construction costs incurred and the total is recognized as construction revenue.

 

2.82.6      Customer accounts receivableTrade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts

 

Customer accounts receivableTrade receivables are amounts due from customers for services performed in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or less, they are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as noncurrent assets.

 

The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts for receivable balances in an amount that is deemed by management to be sufficient to cover probable losses in accounts receivable, based on the analysis of the history of receipts and existing warranties,current guarantees and it does not expect to incur in additional significant losses, mainly in relation to the municipalities.losses.

 

2.92.7      Inventories 

 

Inventories of supplies for consumption and maintenance of the water and sewage systems are stated at the lower of average cost of acquisition or realizable value, and are classified in current assets.

 

2.102.8     Investment property

 

The investment property is recognized byproperties, land, are recorded at the cost of acquisition or the construction cost, less accumulated depreciation, calculated on a straight-line basis at rates that consider the related accumulated depreciation. The depreciation is calculated by straight line basis considering theestimated useful life of the assets. TheExpenditures related to repairs and maintenance expense is recognizedare recorded in the profit and lossincome statement when occurred.incurred.

F-22

F-15


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The Company held somealso maintains few assets for a currently undeterminedindeterminate use in the future, use. Thei.e., it is not defined if the Company is analyzing whetherwill use the assets will be usedproperty in the operation or will be soldsell the property in short-therm.the short term during the ordinary course of business.

 

2.112.9      Property, plant and equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment comprise mainly administrative facilities which are not related tocomposing the assets subject-matter of the concession contracts.agreements. Those assets are stated at historical cost of acquisition or construction cost less depreciation, net of impairment charge, when necessary,necessary. Interest, other financial charges and include interest capitalized incurred during theinflationary effects deriving from financing effectively applied to construction period where applicable, for the qualifying assets.in progress are recorded as cost of respective property, plant and equipment.

 

Subsequent costs included in the asset's carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that the future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they were incurred.

 

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost and is described in Note 11(a)12 (a). Land is not depreciated.

 

The residual amountResidual values and the useful lifelives of the underlying assets are reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, inwhere applicable, at the end of theeach year.

 

Gain and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized within other operating income (expenses) in the income statements.

 

2.122.10 Intangible assets

 

Intangibles are statedValued at acquisition cost and/or construction of the underlying assets, including the construction margin, interest and other financial charges capitalized during the construction period, in this case, for the qualifying assets when applicable.assets. Qualifying assets are assets that, necessarily, take a substantial period to get ready for its intended use or sale. The Company considers that substantial period means a period greater than 12 months. This period was established by considering the completion period of the majority of its constructions which is greater than 12 months.

 

The amortization is calculated when the intangible assets are available for use in the necessary condition established by the Company.

 

The amortization reflects the period over the expected future economic benefits generated by the intangible asset and can be the period of the contract, depending on the contract or the useful life of the underlying assets constructed, what occurs first.asset.

 

The amortization of the intangible assets finishis discontinued when the underlying asset is totallyfully consumed or itsit is alienated, whatdisposed of, whatever occurs first.

 

Infrastructure to which the operator is given access by the concession grantor of the concession or donationdonations received from third parties is not recognized in the consolidated balance sheet, since such donations are controlled by the concession grantor.

 

The amountFinancial resources received to construct infrastructures is recognized inas donations for the profit and loss asconstruction of infrastructure are recorded under “Other operating income (expenses), net”income”.

F-23

F-16


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(a)

(a) Concession arrangementsarrangements/programs

 

The Company operates concession contractscoveringagreements including the provisionrendering of basic andsanitation, environmental, sanitation services, water supply and sewage collection services agreedsigned with the concession grantor.The infrastructure used by SABESP subject to service concession arrangements is considered to be controlled by the concession grantor when:

 

(i)        The grantor controls or regulates what services the operator must provide with the infrastructure, to whom it most provide them, and at what price; and

 

(ii)       The grantor controls the infrastructure, i.e., retains the right to take back the infrastructure at the end of the concession.

 

SABESP's rights over infrastructure operated under concession arrangements is accounted for as an intangible asset as SABESP has the right to charge for use of the infrastructure assets, and users (consumers) have the primary responsibility to pay SABESP for the services.

 

The fair value of construction and other work on the infrastructure represents the cost of the intangible asset and is recognized as revenue, at its fair value, when the infrastructure is built, provided that this work is expected to generate future economic benefits. The accountaccounting policy forto recognize construction revenue recognition for construction services is detailed on note 2.7 “Revenue from sales and services”described in Note 2.5 “Gross Operating Revenue”.

 

Intangible assets underrelated to Concession contractsagreements and Program contracts, when there is no right to receive the residual value of the assets at the end of the contract, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of the contract or the useful life of the underlying asset, what occurs first.whichever is shorter.

 

The investmentsInvestments made and not recovered inthrough rendering of services, within the services provided, during the contract, willagreement term, must be indemnityindemnified by the concession grantor, (1) inwith cash or cash equivalentequivalents or also, in general (2) extendwith the contract period.extension. These investments are amortized over the useful life of the assets.asset.

 

(1)Financial assets are recognized whenLaw 11445/07 prescribes that, whenever possible, basic sanitation public utilities shall have their economic and financial sustainability ensured through the Company has the inconditioning right to receive cashconsideration received from service collection, preferably as tariffs and other public prices, which may be established for each service or cash equivalent in the endboth jointly. Therefore, investments made and not recovered through services rendered, within original term of the contract, period,are recorded as an indemnity forintangible assets and amortized over the investments not recovered inuseful life of the services provided, duringasset, taking into consideration a solid track record of concession renewal and, therefore, the contract period. The Company did not recognized any financial assets due to the fact that there is no expectation that the Company will receive cash (historically the contracts period are extended);continuity of services.

 

(2)Continuing the operation, the assets will be maintained in the intangible assets.

(b) Software licenses

 

Software licensinglicenses of computer programs and business management systems acquired are capitalized and amortized over the period of the licensetheir useful lives, and the expenses associated with maintaining these are recognized as expenses when incurred.

 

2.132.11   Impairment of non-financial assets

F-24


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Property, plant and equipment, intangibles and other noncurrent assets with defineddefinite useful life,lives, are yearly reviewed for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

F-17


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The recoverable amount is the higher of value in use and fair value less cost to sell. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. ForCompany does not have assets with undefinedindefinite useful life, so not subject to amortization, it is tested annually, not considering the expectation of loss (impairment). The recoverable amount is the higher between the amount in uselives and the fair value less the cost to sell. Impairment is recognized in the profit and loss for the amount where the amount of the asset is higher than the recoverable amount. For the purposes of measuring impairment, assets are grouped in the lowest level for whichconcluded that there are separately identifiable cash flows (CGU - Cash Generating Units). The assets adjusted byno indications of impairment are reviewed subsequently to analyze the possible reversion of the impairment in the date covered by the financial statements, except for goodwill.losses.

 

The CGU’s analyzed by the Company to evaluate the recoverable value of the assets were defined according to the business decision-maker. Analyzes are performed by business unit, which consist in a group of  municipalities which has cost sharing or are supported by the same hydrological basin.

The methodology applied was the discounted cash flow mainly related to the assets related to the concessions, considering a five-year period operating cash flow. From 2017 until the maturity date of each contract, the operating cash flow is adjusted, annually, by a 4.5% inflation rate and discounted by the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).

The process to estimate the value in use involves premises, judgments and estimates about the future cash flows and represents the best estimates of the Company, approved by the board.

As of December 31, 2011 the Management evaluated that there is no indication that the amounts of property and equipment, intangibles and other noncurrent assets will not be recovered by future operations.

2.142.12  Accounts payablePayables to suppliers and contractors

 

Accounts payable to contractors and suppliers are obligations to pay for goods or services purchased from suppliers in the ordinary course of business and are classified as current liabilities if the payment is due in the period up to one year. Otherwise, the accounts payable are presented as non-current liabilities and are initially measured at fair value, which generally correspond to the amount billedbill and subsequently to theat amortized cost.

 

2.152.13  Loans and financing

 

Borrowings are initially recognized at fair value, upon receipt of funds, net of transaction costs. Subsequently, borrowings are stated at amortized cost, and interest is accrued based on the effective interest method, as presented in Note 12.13. Loans and financing are classified as current liabilities unless the Company has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.

 

Nonconvertible debentures issued by the Company are recognized in a similar manner to borrowings.

 


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

2.162.14  BorrowingLoan costs

 

Borrowing costs relatedThe cost of loans attributable to acquisition, construction or production of an asset, which, necessarily, takes longrequires a substantial time period to be ready for use or sellsale are capitalized as part of the cost of the asset.these assets. Other borrowing costs of the loan are recognized as expenses in the period that it occurs.they are incurred. Borrowing costs are interest rates and other financial charges overincurred by the loan,Company related to loans, including exchange rate variation, in the termsas described below.

 

The capitalization occurs during the period ofin which the construction,asset has been built, considering the weighted average rate of loans effective on the loans in place in the date of the capitalization.capitalization date.

 

TheFor foreign currency-denominated loans andor financing, acquired in foreign currency, are analyzedthe Company analyzes them as if they were acquiredcontracted in localdomestic currency, andrestricting the capitalization of the interest and/or exchange rate variation is limited by the amount whichthat would be capitalized if these were contracted in the loans and financing were acquired in local currency.domestic market.

 

2.172.15  Payroll and related charges

 

Salaries include an accrual for vacations and the 13th salary and additional payments negotiated in collective labor agreements plus related charges and are recorded on the accruals basis.

 

2.182.16  Profit sharing

 

The Company's profit sharing plan for its employees is based on general targets of the Company as a whole, and based on the performance of each business units. The Company recognizes a provision when has a contractit is contractually required or when there is a prior practice which gave rise toin the past that created a non formal obligation (constructive obligation).constructive obligation. The expenseaccrual for profit sharing is recorded on the accrualsaccrual basis period as an operating expenseexpenses and costasCost of sales and services.services.  

 

2.192.17  Provisions, legal obligation,liabilities, judicial deposits, escrow deposits andcontingent assets

F-18


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Provisions for legalrelated to claims are recognized when: i) the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and iii) the amount can be reliably estimated. Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole.

 

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expendituresdisbursements expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

  

For financial statement presentation purposes, the provisions areprovision is stated net of the related escrow deposits based on the legal right to offset. The bases and the nature of the provisionprovisions for civil, tax, labor and environmental risks are described in Note 15.16.

 

Escrow deposits not linked to related liabilities are recorded in noncurrent assets. The escrowEscrow deposits are restated according to fiscal authorities.for inflation.

Legal obligations occur from tax obligation which objective is to claim the legality. The obligations are recognized in the financial statements.

F-26


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

Contingent assets are not recognized, except when the gain is virtually certain or when there are real warrants or final judicial decision favorable to the Company.recognized.

 

2.202.18 Environmental costs

 

Costs related to ongoing environmental programs are expensed as incurred.in the income statement. Ongoing programs are designed to minimize the environmental impact of the operations and to manage the environmental risks inherent to the Company's activities.

 

2.212.19  Income taxes and social contribution – current and deferred

 

The Company adopted a transitory tax regime (RTT)In order to calculate the income tax and social contribution, since 2008, the Company has been adopting the Transition Tax Regime (RTT), as enactedprovided for by law 11,941/Law 11941/09, consideringi.e., in the account effects by law 6,404/calculation of taxable income considered the accounting criteria of Law 6404/76 beforepreceding the changes considered in law 11,638/amendments to Law 11638/07.

 

This regimeThe RTT will be in placeeffective until athe enactment of the law ruling the tax effects from new law be enacted. accounting methods, seeking tax neutrality.

This regime was optional in the 2008 and 2009 calendar years and was obliged from 2010 on.mandatory as of 2010.

 

The Company opted for this regimeadopting RTT in 2008. Consequently,2009, referring to the calendar years 2008 and 2009. In order to calculate the income tax and social contribution for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company adopted the rules established in the RTT to December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.prerogatives defined by RTT.

 

The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax.

 

(a)         Current tax

 

The currentprovision for income tax and social contribution expense are calculatedis based on the basis oftaxable income for the laws enacted or substantively enactedyear. Income tax was calculated at the balance sheet date, pursuant to Brazilian tax regulations. Income taxes in Brazil comprise Federalrate of 15%, plus a 10% surtax on annual taxable income tax (15%), increased by 10% what exceededexceeding R$240, and social240. Social contribution (9%).was calculated at the rate of 9% on adjusted net income.  Taxable income differs from net income (profit presentedthe profit disclosed in the income statement of income), because it excludes income andor expenses taxable or deductible in other years, as well aspermanently nontaxable or nondeductible items. The provision for income tax and excludes items not permanently taxable or not deductible.social contribution is calculated individually (by each jointly controlled entity) based on the tax rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates and measuresreviews the positions takenassumed by the Company in the income tax return with respect to situationsreturns in whichcases where the applicable tax regulations are subjectregulation gives rise to interpretation. It establishesdifferent interpretations. Management recognizes provisions, where appropriatewhen applicable, based on the basis ofestimated amounts expectedpayable to be paidtax authorities.

F-19


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the tax authorities.Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Deferred taxes

 

(b)         Deferred income tax and social contribution are recognized on the differences betweenthe tax bases and the accounting balances of assets and liabilities, as prescribed by IAS 12 - Taxes on Income; however, they are not recognized if generated in the first-time recording of assets and liabilities in transactions that do not affect the tax bases, except for business combinations. Deferred income tax and social contribution are determined based on the tax rates and laws enacted or substantially enacted at the end of the reporting period and applicable when the respective income tax and social contribution will be paid.

 

Deferred income tax and social contribution taxes are recognized, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements, according to IAS 12. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit nor loss. Deferred income and social contribution taxes are determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

Deferred income and social contribution taxes assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profitthere will be available againsta positive tax base for which the temporary differences can be utilized.used and tax loss carryforwards can be offset.

F-27


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Deferred income and social contribution taxestax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offsetset off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxestax assets and liabilities relateare related to incomethe taxes leviedimposed by the same taxation authority on eithertax authorities over the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis.entity.

  

2.222.20Accrued taxesTaxes on revenues

 

Accrued taxes on revenuesRevenues from sales and services are recognized on accrual basis for PASEP (Public Servant Fund) and Cofins (Social Security Financing Contribution). These taxesCofins. Taxes levied on billed amounts to public entities are calculated on differences from tax basis of billing to government entities, whichdue when bills are taxable when the invoices are settled. received.

As these taxes are non-cumulative, they arecalculated by the non-cumulativeness regime and presented net of tax credits, as deductions from gross revenues. Debts and credits arising from othermeasured on “other operating income and expenses, respectively,income” are presented as deductions from the respective operating income or expense.

 

2.232.21  Pension obligations

 

(a)Defined benefit

 

Liabilities from defined benefit pension plan obligations correspond to the present value of the defined benefit obligation at balance sheet date, less the fair value of the plan'splan assets, and adjusted by unrecognized actuarial gains or losses. The defined benefit obligation is(G1) and (G0) are calculated on an annual basis by independent actuaries, using the projected unit credit method. The estimated future cash outflows is discounted to its present value, using the interest rates of the Brazilian National Government bonds with maturities that approximate the maturity of the related liability.

 

The Company adoptedadopts the corridor approachmethod to recognize the actuarial gains and losses. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are in excess of the greater of 10% of the fair value of plan assets or 10% of the present value of the defined benefit obligation are charged or credited to income over the employees' expected average remaining working lives. The higher the number of plan retirees the smaller is the average remaining working period of plan participants. For planssubstantially composed of retirees and pensioners, the Company immediately records all actuarial gains and losses in excess of the limits of the corridor, i.e. on the first day of the subsequent year after the calculation of the referred actuarial gains or losses. The expenses related to pension plan are recognized in profit and loss of the year as costCost of sales and services, selling expenses or administrative expenses, according to employee’s allocation.

F-20


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

In aan event where a curtailment relates to only some of the employees covered by a plan, or where only part of an obligation is settled, the gain or loss includes a proportionate share of the previously unrecognized past service cost and actuarial gains and losses. The proportionate share is determined on the basis of the present value of the obligations before and after the curtailment or settlement.

 

The Company paysmakes contributions to an unlisted private pension entity,defined benefit plans on a contractual basis and sponsored thereby, managed by Fundação Sabesp de Seguridade Social – Sabesprev, inSABESPREV, a compulsory basis, contracted or not. The regular contributions consist of the net costs of the plan and are recognized in the profit and loss of the period.

(b)         Defined contribution

The Company participates in a defined contribution plan (Sabesprev Mais), controlled by a closedsupplementary private pension entity – Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social (Sabesprev) that provide postretirement benefits to the Company´s employees.

F-28


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Company makes fixed contribution to a closed privateclose-end pension entity. The Company has no further legal or contractual obligation to provide further contributions in case the pension fund is not sufficient to pay the benefits to all employees related to the service cost of current or prior period.

With respect to the defined contribution plan, the Company contributes to Sabesprev on mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The regular contributions are recognized in the income statement of the period.

 

(b)Defined contribution

The Company makes contributions to defined contribution plans (Sabesprev Mais) on a contractual basis and sponsored thereby, managed by Fundação Sabesp de Seguridade Social – SABESPREV, a supplementary private close-end pension entity that provides post-employment benefits to its employees.

A defined contribution plan is a pension plan according to which the Company makes fixed contributions to a separate entity. The Company has no obligation of making contributions if the fund does not have sufficient funds to pay to all employees the benefits related to employee’s services in current and previous period.

2.242.22 Financial income and expenses

 

Financial income is primarily comprised of interest, inflation adjustments and exchange variations on short term investmentsescrow deposits and client negotiation. negotiations with customer to pay by installments, using the effective interest rate method.

Financial expenses are primarily comprised of interest, inflation adjustments and exchange variations on loans and financing, refinancing, provisions, public-private partnership, program contract commitments and provisions. These financial income and expenses are calculated using the effective interest rate method.

Inflation adjustments and foreign exchange gains and losses derive from the collection or payment to third parties, as contractually required by law or court decision, and recognized on an accrual basis.

Inflation adjustments included in the agreements are not considered embedded derivatives, since they are deemed as inflation adjustment rates for the Company’s economic scenario.

 

2.252.23 Leases 

 

According to IAS 17, leasesLease agreements are classified as financial leaseslease when there is transfer substantially all theproperty, risks and rewards incidentalinherent to the ownership of an asset.asset to the lessee are transferred. Other leases are classified as operational lease. Operationaloperating leases, are recognized as expenses in the profit and lossincome statement on a linearstraight-line basis during the contract.lease period.

F-21


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Financial leaseslease agreements are recognizedmeasured based aton the lower of the present value of the minimum payment of the contractlease payments or the fair value of leased asset at the related asset in the beginningstart of the contract.lease. The paymentsamounts payable deriving from considerations of financial lease agreements are recognized asand allocated between financial expenses or reducing the leasing in orderand amortization of financial lease payables so as to obtain a linearconstant interest rate. The corresponding obligationliability is recognizedrecorded as short or long termshort- and long-term debt.

 

2.262.24 Other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities

 

Other assets are stated at cost of acquisition, net of any impairment loss, whenwhere applicable. The amounts recognized as other liabilities are stated at known or estimated amounts, including, where applicable, related charges and monetary variations.

 

2.272.25 Dividends and Interest on Shareholders' Equityshareholders’ equity

 

The Company uses the tax benefits of distributing dividends as interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity, as permitted by Brazilian Law. This distribution of dividend is accounted for in accordance with Brazilian Law 9,249/9249/95 for tax deductibility purposes, limited to the daily pro rata fluctuation of the Long-term Interest Rate (TJLP). The benefit attributed to the shareholders is recognized in the current liability against Equity, based on the articles of association.its by-laws. Dividends and interest on shareholders´ equity over the minimum established in the articles of associationby-laws are recognized when approved by the shareholders in the general meeting. The tax effects of the interest on shareholders’ equity are recognized in the income statement offor the year.year, under the same recognition basis.

 

2.282.26 Present value adjustment

 

Current and noncurrent financial assets and liabilities are adjusted to present value based on discount rate at current market rate as of the transaction date, when the effects are relevant.

2.27 Segment reporting

F-29

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker, for taking decision, for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments.

Based on how the Company treats its business and how decision-making of resources allocation is made, two operating segments (water and sewage) were stated for financial reporting purposes. The segment reporting is detailed in Note 21.

2.28 Translation into foreign currency

(a)  Functional and reporting currency

Items included in the financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the company operates ("the functional currency"). The financial statements are presented in Brazilianreais (R$), which is also the Company's functional and presentation currency. All financial information presented has been presented in reais, except where indicated.

F-22


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(b)Foreign currency translation

 

Foreign currency-denominated transactions are translated into Brazilianreais using the exchange rates prevailing at the transaction dates. Balance sheet accounts are translated at the exchange rateprevailing at balance sheet date.

Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of these transactions and the translation of foreign currency-denominated cash assets and liabilities are recognized in foreign exchange result in the income statement, except for loans and financing related to property, plant and equipment or intangible assets in progress, where foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized as contra entry to the asset while construction is in progress.

2.29 New and amendedrevised standards adopted by the Company

and interpretations effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012

 In 2009, the Company has early adopted IAS 24 - Related Party Disclosures (as amended in November 2009). The disclosure requirements for entities that are controlled, jointly-controlled or significantly influenced by a government (referred to as government-related entities) are simplified and so detailed disclosures of all transactions with entities controlled by the São Paulo State Government are not presented in these financial statements.

Standard

Key requirements

Effectiveness date

Deferred taxes: recovery of underlying assets (amendments to IAS 12)

It amends IAS 12 – Income Tax to provide the assumption that the recovery of the carrying amount of an asset measured based on the fair value model of IAS 40 – Investment Property will usually occur through sale.

Due to this amendment, SIC 21 – Income Taxes – Recovery of Revalued Non-Depreciable Assets would no longer be applicable to investment property carried at fair value. The amendments also include in IAS 12 a remaining guidance previously included in SIC 21, which was duly removed.

January 1, 2012

 

2.30Standards, amendmentsNew and revised standards and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective

Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Company

 

The followingCompany did not adopt the new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards were issued by IASB but are not effective for 2011. The early adoption of these standards, even though encouraged by IASB, has not been implemented in Brazil by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (CPC).revised IFRSs below:

 

.IFRS 9                                                  Financial Instruments4

IFRS 10                                               Consolidated Financial Statements2

IFRS 11                                                Joint Arrangements2

IFRS 12                                                Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities2

IFRS 13                                                Fair Value Measurement2

Amendments to IAS 19, "Employee benefits" was amended1                    Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income1

Amendments to IFRS 7                 Disclosure – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities2

Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7       Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures4

Amendments to IFRS 10, 11 and 12       Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of Interests in June 2011. The impact on the Group will be as follows: (i) to eliminate the corridor approach; (ii) to recognize all actuarial gains and losses in other comprehensive income as they occur; (iii) to immediately recognize all past service costs; and (iv) to replace interest cost and expected return on plan assets with a net interest amount that is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability (asset). Management is evaluating the total impact of these changes for the Company. The standard is applicable as from January 1, 2013.Other Entities: Transition Guide2

 

.F-IFRS 9, "Financial instruments" addresses the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. IFRS 9 was issued in November 2009 and October 2010. It replaces the parts of IAS 39 that relate to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 requires financial assets to be classified into two measurement categories: those measured at fair value and those measured at amortized cost. The determination is made at initial recognition. The basis of classification depends on the entity’s business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial instruments. For financial liabilities, the standard retains most of the IAS 39 requirements. The main change is that, in cases where the fair value option is taken for financial liabilities, the part of a fair value change due to an entity’s own credit risk is recorded in other comprehensive income rather than the statement of income, unless this creates an accounting mismatch. Management is evaluating the impact of this standard for the Company. The standard is applicable as from January 1, 2013.23

   

.IFRS 10, "Consolidated financial statements" builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control. Management is evaluating the impact of this standard for the Company. The standard is applicable as from January 1, 2013.

.IFRS 11,"Joint arrangements" was issued in May 2011. The standard provides for a more realistic reflection of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form. There are two types of joint arrangements: (i) joint operations - arise where a joint operator has rights to the assets and obligations relating to the arrangement and hence accounts for its interest in assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses; and (ii) joint ventures - arise where the joint operator has rights to the net assets of the arrangement and hence equity accounts for its interest. The proportional consolidation method will no longer be permitted in joint ventures. Management is evaluating the impact of this standard for the Company. The standard is applicable as from January 1, 2013.

F-30


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

IAS 19 (revised in 2011)

Employee Benefits2

IAS 27 (revised in 2011)

Separate Financial Statements2

IAS 28 (revised in 2011)

Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures2

Amendments to IAS 32

Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities3

Amendments to IFRSs

2009-2011 Annual Improved Cycle

IFRIC 20

Stripping Costs in the Production Phase in a Surface Mine2

1 Effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012.

2 Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

3 Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

4 Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

The new standards, amendments and interpretations that may affect the Company are as follows:

IFRS 11 supersedes IAS 31Interest in Joint Ventures. IFRS 11 addresses how a joint arrangement with two or more parties holding joint control should be classified. SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers will be removed with the issue of IFRS 11. According to IFRS 11, joint arrangements are classified as joint operations or joint ventures, depending on the rights and obligations of the contractual parties. On the other hand, according to IAS 31, there are three types of joint arrangements: jointly controlled entities, jointly controlled assets, and jointly controlled operations. In addition, according to IFRS 11, joint ventures must be recognized by the equity method, while jointly controlled entities may be recorded by the equity method or by the proportionate accounting method, according to IAS 31.

The adoption of IFRS 11 will result in changes in the accounting for investments held by the Company in Sesamm – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim S/A, Águas de Andradina S.A., Águas de Castilho, Saneaqua Mairinque S.A., Aquapolo Ambiental S.A. and Attend Ambiental S/A, jointly controlled entities according to IAS 31, currently accounted for the proportionate consolidation method. According to IFRS 11, these jointly controlled entities will be classified as joint venturesand recorded by the equity method, resulting in the recognition of the Company’s proportionate interest in net assets, net income for the year, and other comprehensive income in a single account which will be reported in the consolidated statement of financial position, as well as in the consolidated income statement or comprehensive income as “investment in joint venture” and “equity in earnings of joint venture”, respectively. Therefore, the consolidated balances as of December 31, 2012 are shown below:

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

Original

 

IFRS 11 Effects

 

After applying IFRS 11

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

3,336,865

 

(6,267)

 

3,330,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments

 

-

 

20,826

 

20,826

Intangible assets

 

21,991,922

 

(24,396)

 

21,967,526

Property, plant and equipment

 

383,383

 

(186,673)

 

196,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total noncurrent assets

 

23,338,928

 

(202,834)

 

23,136,094

Total assets

 

26,675,793

 

(209,101)

 

26,466,692

F-24


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

December 31, 2012

Liabilities and equity

 

Original

 

IFRS 11 Effects

 

After application of IFRS 11

Total current liabilities

 

3,797,370

 

(39,181)

 

3,758,189

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

7,701,929

 

(169,268)

 

7,532,661

Total noncurrent liabilities

 

11,162,846

 

(169,920)

 

11,992,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

14,960,216

 

(209,101)

 

14,751,115

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity

 

11,715,577

 

-

 

11,715,577

Total liabilities and equity

 

26,675,793

 

(209,101)

 

26,466,692

 

 

2012

 

 

Original

 

IFRS 11 Effects

 

After applying IFRS 11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating revenue

 

10,754,435

 

(16,804)

 

10,737,631

Gross profit

 

4,289,037

 

(1,357)

 

4,287,680

equity in earnings of joint venture of subsidiaries

 

-

 

(6,532)

 

(6,532)

Operating profit

 

2,845,260

 

(1,916)

 

2,843,344

Income before income tax and social contribution

 

2,543,904

 

3,768

 

2,547,672

Net income for the year

 

1,911,900

 

-

 

1,911,900

Basic and diluted earnings per share (in reais)

 

2.80

 

-

 

2.80

IAS 19 Employee Benefit

The amendments to IAS 19 change the accounting for both defined benefit plans and severance pay benefits. The most significant change refers to the accounting for changes in defined benefit obligations and plan assets. These amendments require the recognition ofchanges in defined benefit obligations and in the fair value of the plan assets as they occur, and, therefore, the elimination of the corridor approach allowed in the previous version of IAS 19 and the early recognition of past cost of services. In addition, the amendments require all actuarial gains and losses to be immediately recognized through other comprehensive income so that the net asset or liability of the pension plan is recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position so that to reflect the full amount of the plan’s deficit or surplus. Additionally, interest expenses and the return expected on the plan assets used in previous version of IAS 19 were replaced by a “net interest” amount, calculated based on the discount rate of the asset or liability of the net defined benefit.

F-25


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

.IFRS 12, "Disclosures of interests in other entities" includes the disclosure requirementsThe amendments to IAS 19 are effective for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehiclesannual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and other off balance sheet vehicles. Management is evaluatingrequire retrospective adoption. Based on Management’s preliminary evaluation, the impact of this standard for the Company. The standard is applicable as fromCompany’s adoption of the amendments to IAS 19 in the year ending December 31, 2013, would be a reduction of in the Company’s equity on January 1, 2013.2013 in the amount of R$468,220 (R$34,370 increase in equity on January 1, 2012). The retrospective adoption will also impact the results of 2011, which will increase in the amount of R$157,527.

 

This effect represents the full recognition of actuarial gains and losses through other comprehensive income.

.Annual improvements to the 2009-2011 IFRS 13, “Fair value measurement” was issued in May 2011.cycle (May 2012)

The annual improvements to the 2009-2011 IFRS 13 aimscycle include several amendments to improve consistencyseveral IFRSs. The amendments to IFRSs are effective to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and reduce complexity by providing a preciseinclude:

• amendments to IAS 16 – Property, Plant and Equipment; and

• amendments to IAS 32 – Financial Instruments: Presentation.

Amendments to IAS 16

The amendments to IAS 16 clarify that spare parts, stand-by equipment and service equipment are classified as property, plant and equipment when they meet the definition of fair valueproperty, plant and a single sourceequipment set out in IAS 16, or otherwise as inventory. The Company does not expect significant impacts on its financial statements.

Amendments to IAS 32

The amendments to IAS 32 clarify that the income tax related to distributions to holders of fair value measurementequity instruments and disclosure requirements for use across IFRSs. The requirements, which are largely aligned between IFRSs and US GAAP, do not extend the use of fair value accounting but provide guidance on how itequity transaction costs should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within IFRSs or US GAAP.accounted pursuant to IAS 12 - Income Taxes. The Company is yet to assess IFRS 13’s full impact. The standard is applicable as from January 1, 2013.does not expect relevant impacts on its financial statements.

 

There are no other IFRSs or IFRIC interpretations that are not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Company.

3Financial Risk Management

 

3.1Financial risk factors

 

The Company's activities exposeare exposed to Brazilian economic environment, exposing it to a variety of financial risks: market risk, (including foreign currency risk andsuch as exchange rate, interest rate, risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company analyzes the globalCompany’s financial risk consideringmanagement is focused on the unpredictability of the financial marketmarkets and tries to minimize the potentialaims at minimizing adverse impacts on its financial impacts.performance.

 

The Company has not utilized derivative instruments although it may enter in forward exchange transactionsany of the reporting periods.

F-26


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and financing funding transactions2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilianreais – R$, unless otherwiseto mitigate the foreign currency exposure.indicated)

                                                                                                                

(a) Market risk

 

Foreign currency risk

 

The Company is exposedSABESP’s foreign exchange exposure entails market risks associated with Brazilianreal currency fluctuations against the US dollar and the yen. SABESP’s foreign currency-denominated liabilities mainly include US dollar- and yen-denominated loans.

In case of Brazilianreal depreciation in relation to exchange rate fluctuations from Brazilian reais to US dollars and Yens. Liabilities in foreign currency include loans in US dollars and Yens.

Depreciation of Brazilian reais comparing to loans in foreign currencywhich the debt is denominated, SABESP will incur in losses relatedmonetary loss in relation to such liability.debt.

 

ForeignSABESP’s specific foreign currency risks to SABESP are related to the exposure ofexposures caused by its short and long term loanslong-term debts denominated in foreign currency.

 

The management of SABESP’s foreign currency risk are monitored consideringexposure considers several actualcurrent and projected economic factors, besidebesides market conditions.

This risk arises from the possibility of the Company incurring losses due to foreign exchange fluctuations that would affect the balances of market condition.foreign currency-denominated loans and financing and related financial expenses. The Company does not havemaintain hedge or swap contracts or any financial instrument to hedgeagainst this risk. The Company monitors the financial debts to reduce the exposure to exchange rate variationrisk, but conducts an active management of debt, taking advantage of opportunities to exchangereplace expensive debts todebt for cheaper debts bydebt, reducing financing coststhe cost through early paymentaccelerated maturity.

A significant amount of its debts. The prioritythe Company’s financial debt is to acquire new debts with multilateral banks and official agencies from foreign governments, which are characterized by low cost and long term maturity.

F-31


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notesindexed to the Consolidated Financial Statements

AmountsU.S. dollar and Yen, in thousandsthe total amount of reais, unless otherwise indicated

OnR$3,215.8 million on December 31, 2011 and 2010, R$ 2012 (R$3,053.4 million and R$2,248.9 million, which correspondin December 2011). Below, the Company’s exposure to 36.4% and 27.2%, respectively, of the debt of SABESP was denominated in foreign currency. The debts of SABESP denominated in foreign currency were acquired, mainly, with Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). Considering those facts, the Company is exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations which can result in material adverse effects to the business.risk:

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Foreign currency

 

R$

 

Foreign currency

 

R$

Loans and financing – US$

1,136,274

 

2,321,976

 

1,113,236

 

2,088,208

Loans and financing – Yen

37,535,650

 

890,346

 

39,456,912

 

959,198

Interest and charges from loans and financing – US$

 

 

12,487

 

 

 

13,025

Interest and charges from loans and financing – Yen

 

 

6,374

 

 

 

6,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

 

3,231,183

 

 

 

3,067,077

 

The Company's exposure to currency risks are summarized as follows:table above shows the foreign currency-denominated loans and financing, emphasizing that the balance is gross of loans costs of R$15,422 on December 31, 2012 (R$13,656 in December 2011).

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency

 

R$

 

Foreign currency

 

R$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing - US$

1,113,236

 

2,088,208

 

1,084,898

 

1,807,657

Loans and financing - Yen

39,456,912

 

959,198

 

21,316,000

 

436,978

Debt issuance cost

 

 

(13,656)

 

 

 

(10,801)

Interest and other charges

 

 

19,671

 

 

 

15,094

Total

 

 

3,053,421

 

 

 

2,248,928

As of December 31, 2011, if 2012,had the Brazilianreal had weakened appreciated or strengthened depreciated by 10% against the US dollar andtheYen with all other variables held remaining constant, post-taxthe effect on pre-tax profit for the year and in the shareholders’ equity would have been R$ 201,129 (2010 - R$ 148,146)323,118 (R$306,708 in December2011) lower or higher, mainly as a result of foreign exchange losses or gains on the translation of foreign currency-denominated loans.

 

 

 

December 31,

2011

 

December 31,

2010

Projection of valuation / devaluation of Real by 10%

 

 

 

Loans and financing

3,047,406

 

2,244,635

Variation Dolar/ Yen

10%

 

10%

Valuation or devaluation of Real

304,741

 

224,464

Income taxes rate

34%

 

34%

Income taxes

103,612

 

76,318

Valuation or devaluation net of taxes

201,129

 

148,146

 

 

 

 

Interest rate risk

 

This risk arises from the possibility that the Company could incur losses due to fluctuations in interest rates, increasing the financial expenses related to loans and financing.

 

On December 31, 2011 and 2010, R$ 2,537.1 million or 29.5% and R$2.529,4 million or 30.6%, respectively, of the debt of SABESP were denominated in Brazilian reais and indexed to UPR (“Unidade Padrão de Referência”, a Reference Standard Unit, which is equal to the TR “Taxa Referencial”, aReference Rate). On December 31, 2011 and 2010, R$1,882.3 million or 21.9% and R$2,064.7 million or 25.0%, respectively, of the debt of SABESP were denominated in Brazilian reais and indexed to the fluctuation of DI (Interbank Deposit) rate.F-27

F-32


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 


On December 31, 2011 and 2010, R$ 1,152.1 million and R$996.1 million, respectively, of the debt of SABESP were denominated in US dollars and indexed to the fluctuation of rates of Inter-American Development Bank (IADB).

 

On December 31, 2011 and 2010, theThe Company has not entered into any derivative contractscontract to hedge againstthe UPR (Reference Standard Unit), DI (Interbank Deposit) or for IADB (Inter-American Development Bank) rates;against this risk; however it continually monitors market interest rates, in order to evaluate the possible need to replace its debt. The Company is obliged to invest the excess of cash in financial institutions controlled by the Federal Government.

 

The Company invest the excess of cash, which corresponded to R$ 2,031.1 million and R$1,853.2 million, on December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, mainly in short term investments. As a result, the exposure of SABESP to interest rate risk is partially limited to the financial gain of such investments, which normally are indexed to the fluctuation of DI (Interbank Deposit) rate.

The Company maintained approximately 28% of its loans and financing in local and foreign currency indexed to fixes rates. During 2011 and 2010, the loans and financing indexed to variable rates were in local and foreign currency.

The table below provides the Company's loans and financing denominated inreais subject to variable interest rate:

 

 

 

December 31,
2011

 

December 31,
 2010

 

 

 

 

 

UPR(i)

 

2,537,089

 

2,529,398

CDI(ii)

 

1,882,341

 

2,064,714

IGP-M(iii)

 

-

 

493,869

TJLP(iv)

 

886,138

 

703,710

IPCA(v)

 

187,697

 

223,996

Fixed rate

 

49,609

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and financing in local currency

 

5,542,874

 

6,015,687

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

UPR(i)

 

2,192,684

 

2,520,936

CDI(ii)

 

1,799,830

 

1,815,000

TJLP(iii)

 

845,913

 

881,861

IPCA(iv)

 

697,385

 

180,759

LIBOR(v)

 

1,243,058

 

1,123,662

Interest and charges

 

114,421

 

110,999

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

6,893,291

 

6,633,217

 

(i) UPR (Unidade Padrão de Referência), a Reference Standard Unit,standard benchmark unit, which is equal to the TR, (Taxa Referencial), a Reference Rate.managed prime rate.

(ii)(ii) CDI(Certificado de Depósito Interbancário), an interbank deposit certificate.certificate rate

(iii) TJLP (iii) IGP-M(Índice Geral de Preços do Mercado),general market price index.

(iv) TJLP(Taxa de Juros a Longo Prazo),Prazoa), long-term interest rate index.

(v)(iv) IPCA ((Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo),a consumerprice index.index

(v) LIBOR - London Interbank Offered Rate

 

Another risk to which the Company is exposed is the mismatch ofbetween the monetary restatementinflation adjustment indices of its loans and financing with those of its receivables. Water supply and sewage services tariffs do not necessarily follow the increases in the inflation adjustment and interest rates affecting the Company's indebtedness.

F-33debt.

 


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

As of December 31, 2011,2012, if interest rates on loans and financing denominated in Brazilianreais had been 100 basis points1% higher or lower with all other variables held constant, post-taxthe effects on pre-tax profit for the year before taxes would have been R$ 35,114 (2010 - R$ 39,338)68,932 (R$66,332 in December 2011) lower or higher, mainly as a result of a lower or higher interest expense on floating rate loans and financing.

 

(b)Credit risk

 

Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, deposits in banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to wholesale and retail customers, including outstanding accounts receivable.receivable, restricted cash, receivables from related parties and indemnities. The Company is required by law to invest its surplus cashfunds exclusively with financial institutions controlled by the State Government.Banco do Brasil (rating AA+(bra)). Credit risk exposure to retail customers is mitigated by sales to a geographically dispersed customer base.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date are the carrying amounts of instruments classified as cash equivalents, deposits in banks and financial institutions, wholesaletrade receivables, restricted cash, receivables from related parties and retail customersindemnities in the balance sheet. (See notes 5, 6, 7, 8 and 7)9).

 

TheF-28


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Regarding the financial assets held with financial institutions, the credit quality of financial assets that are neitheris not past due nor impairedor subject to provision for impairment can be assessed by reference to external credit ratings (if available) or to historical information about counterparty default rates. The credit quality of counterparties which are banks, such as cashdeposits and cash equivalents,financial investments, the Company considers the lower rating of the counterparty published by three mainly international agency of rating(Moody's, agencies (Moody's, Fitch eand S&P), according to internal policy of management of market risk:risk management:

 

 

 

December 31

 

 

2012

 

2011

Cash at bank and short term bank deposit

 

 

 

 

AAA(bra)

 

1,916,794

 

43,062

AA+(bra)

 

507

 

2,104,869

Others (*)

 

3,877

 

2,058

 

 

1,921,178

 

2,149,989

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Cash at bank and short term bank deposits

 

 

 

brAAA 

38,058

 

27,673

brAA+

2,102,304

 

1,945,697

Others (*)

1,717

 

14,634

 

2,142,079

 

1,988,004

 

 

 

 

(*) This category is comprised byincludes current accounts and investment funds in banks whichthat have no credit rating information available.

 

The available credit rating information of the banks in which the Company made transactions during 20112012 is as follow:

 

Agencies’ rate

Banks

Fitch

 

Moody's

 

Standard Poor's

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banco do Brasil S.A.

AA+AAA (bra)

 

Aaa.br

 

brAAA

Banco Santander Brasil S.A.

AAA (bra)

 

Aaa.br

 

brAAA

Caixa EconomicaEconômica Federal

AA+AAA (bra)

 

Aaa.br

 

-

Banco Bradesco S.A.

AAA (bra)

 

Aaa.br

 

brAAA

Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.

AAA (bra)

 

Aaa.br

 

AAAbr

brAAA

For financial assets corresponding to trade receivables, the Company’s credit risk is minimized, given that the client base is diversified.

 

(c) Liquidity risk

 

The Company'sCompany’s liquidity is primarily reliant uponrelies mainly on cash providedgenerated by operating activities, borrowingsloans from state and Brazilian Federal and State governmentalfederal government financial institutions and financingfunding in the domesticlocal andinternational capital markets. TheManagement of the liquidity risk management considers the assessment of its liquidity requirements to ensure itthat the Company has sufficientenough cash to meet operationalits operating and capital expenditures needs.expenditure needs, and debt repayment.

The funds held by the Company are invested in interest-bearing current accounts, time deposits, short-term deposits and securities, selecting instruments with appropriate maturity or liquidity sufficient to provide margin as determined by projections mentioned above.

F-29

F-34


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

The excess of cash is invested in short-term investment indexed by interest, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments considering appropriate maturity date and liquidity.

The table below providesanalyzes the Company's contractual undiscounted cash flowsfinancial assets and liabilities of the financial liabilitiesCompany, into relevant maturities, including the installment of principal and interest to be paid according to the agreement.

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018 onwards

 

Total

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

1,798,489

 

1,262,826

 

1,702,103

 

1,141,226

 

821,117

 

6,158,718

 

12,884,479

Payables to suppliers and contractors

 

297,198

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

297,198

Services payable

 

389,091

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

389,091

Interest on shareholders’ equity

 

414,355

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

414,355

Pension obligations

 

229,406

 

235,667

 

242,192

 

249,770

 

257,442

 

1,880,988

 

3,095,465

Public-private partnership (PPP)

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

305,193

 

514,816

Program contract commitments

 

160,784

 

11,227

 

66,052

 

4,222

 

1,911

 

37,204

 

281,400

Other liabilities

 

170,691

 

167,742

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

338,433

 

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017 onwards

 

Total

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

2,115,837

 

1,689,526

 

1,157,590

 

946,577

 

904,410

 

5,162,889

11,976,829

Payables to suppliers and contractors

 

255,557

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

255,557

Services payable

 

383,116

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

383,116

Interest on shareholders’ equity

 

247,486

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

247,486

Pension obligations

 

207,900

 

212,705

 

218,855

 

225,186

 

232,853

 

1,837,626

2,935,125

Public-private partnership (PPP)

 

40,283

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

41,925

 

405,118

613,101

Program contract commitments

 

71,088

 

78,281

 

1,150

 

62,974

 

1,144

 

16,589

231,226

Other liabilities

 

188,451

 

195,276

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

383,727

               

Future interest

Future interest was calculated based on the balance sheet as ofcontractual clauses for all agreements. For agreements with floating interest rate, the interest rates used correspond to December 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014 / 2015 / 2016

 

from 2017 then on

 

Total

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

2,115,837

 

1,689,526

 

3,008,577

 

5,162,889

 

11,976,829

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractor

 

255,557

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

255,557

Services payable

 

383,116

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

383,116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

 

1,744,324

 

2,071,161

 

3,834,599

 

4,880,026

 

12,530,110

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractor

 

144,043

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

144,043

Services payable

 

295,172

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

295,172

There are no financial assets or liabilities included in “Other assets” or “Other liabilities”.2012.

 

3.2Capital management

 

The Company's objectives when managing capital are ensure its ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders, and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

 

The Company monitors capital based on the leverage ratio. This ratio corresponds to net debt divided by total capital. Net debt corresponds to total loans and financing (including short and long term loan and financing, as presented in the financial statements) less cash andcash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as total equity as shown in the Parent Company’s balance sheet plus net debt.

 

The financial leverage rate on December 31, 2011 and 2010 as summarized below:F-30

   

 

 

December
31, 2011

 

December
31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and financing

 

8,596,295

 

8,264,615

Less: cash and cash equivalents

 

(2,149,989)

 

(1,989,179)

 

 

 

 

 

Net debt

 

6,446,306

 

6,275,436

Total equity

 

10,545,896

 

9,681,800

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital

 

16,992,202

 

15,957,236

 

 

 

 

 

Leverage ratio

 

37.9%

 

39.3%



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and financing

 

9,069,320

 

8,596,295

Less: cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,921,178)

 

(2,149,989)

 

 

 

 

 

Net debt

 

7,148,142

 

6,446,306

Total equity

 

11,715,577

 

10,545,896

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital

 

18,863,719

 

16,992,202

 

 

 

 

 

Leverage ratio

 

38%

 

38%

 

In 2010, the Company's leverage ratio decreased to 37.9% asAs of December 31, 2011, compared to 39.3% as of2012, the leverage ratio did not change from December 31, 2010, due to increase in short term investments.

The capital is not managed at consolidated level, but only at parent company level, whereas the subsidiaries are not relevant.2011.

 

3.3Fair value estimates

 

The Company adoptedIt is assumed that the amendment to IFRS 7 for financial instruments that are measuredcarrying amounts of trade receivables (current), less impairment and trade payables approximate their fair values in balance sheet at fair value, which requires the disclosure of fair value measurements by levelview of the followingshort maturity. Long-term trade receivables also approximate their fair value measurement hierarchy:

.     Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (level 1).

.     Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset values, as they will be adjusted by inflation and/or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2).will bear contractual interest rates over time.

.     Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3).

The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing or service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis. The quoted market price used for financial assets is the current bid price. These instruments are included in level 1.

The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, time deposits and certificates of bank deposit) is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.

If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3.

Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:

.     Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments.

.     Other techniques, such as analysis of discounted cash flows, are used to determine the fair value of the remaining financial instruments.

The only financial instrument measured at fair value are represented by the short-term investment on Certified of Bank Deposits (CDB), classified as cash equivalent, amounting to R$ 2,031,122 and R$ 1,853,177 in December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These investments are measured at fair value through profit and loss at level 2.

F-36


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

3.4      Financial instrumentsFinancial Instruments

The Company operates with many financial instruments, particularly cash and cash equivalents, including financial investments, and loans and financing as described below.

 

The estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount

 

Fair value

 

Carrying amount

 

Fair value

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

amount

 

Fair

value

 

Carrying amount

 

Fair

value

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

2,149,989

 

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

1,989,179

1,921,178

 

1,921,178

 

2,149,989

 

2,149,989

Restricted cash

99,729

 

99,729

 

302,570

 

302,570

64,977

 

64,977

 

99,733

 

99,733

Customer accounts receivable,net

1,406,372

 

1,406,372

 

1,324,157

 

1,324,157

Accounts receivable from related party, net

355,621

 

355,621

 

368,848

 

368,848

Escrow deposits

54,178

 

54,178

 

43,543

 

43,543

Trade receivables

1,378,853

 

1,378,853

 

1,406,372

 

1,406,372

Receivables from related parties

262,371

 

262,371

 

355,621

 

355,621

Other accounts receivable

242,318

 

242,318

 

195,876

 

195,876

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and financing

8,596,295

 

8,500,515

 

8,264,615

 

9,698,547

9,069,320

 

9,418,918

 

8,596,295

 

8,500,515

Accounts payable to suppliers and Contractors

255,557

 

255,557

 

144,043

 

144,043

Payables to suppliers and contractors

297,198

 

297,198

 

255,557

 

255,557

 

Loans and financing

TheTo obtain the fair value of the loans and financing, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follow.the following criteria have been adopted:

 

(i)Agreements with Banco do Brasil and CEF (Federal Savings Bank) were projected until final maturity, at contractual rates (projected TR + spread) and discounted at present value by TR x DI, both rates were obtained from BM&F.

 

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

 

Carrying amount

Market value

 

Carrying amount

Market value

Bank loans

 

 

 

 

Loans and finance local currency (i)

1,866,936

1,756,889

2,721,818

2,866,244

Debêntures (ii)

3,124,159

2,901,483

2,771,562

3,372,377

BNDES (iii)

496,823

496,823

509,572

509,572

Financial lease (vi)

49,609

49,609

-

-

Foreign currency (iv)

3,053,421

3,290,364

2,248,928

2,937,619

Other (v)

5,347

5,347

12,735

12,735

 

8,596,295

8,500,515

8,264,615

9,698,547

 

The fair value was obtained as follow:

F-37F-31


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(i) Loans and finance – local currency are considered by carrying amount plus contractual interest rate till mature date, discounted to present value considering a future interest rate published by BM&F.

 

(ii)(ii)    Debentures are considered by their carrying amount plus contractual interest rate tillwere projected up to the final mature date (IPCA, DI, TJLP or TR), and discounted to present value considering the future interest rate published by ANBIMA in the secondary market, as of December 31, 20102012 and the Company’s share traded in the Brazilian market.

 

(iii)  BNDES loans are financial instruments valued at carrying amount plus contractual interest rate till mature date, and are indexed by long term interest rate – TJLP, which is aTJLP.

These loans have specific ratefeatures and cannot be compared to any other rate availablethe terms and conditions defined in the market. The Company considersloan agreements with the BNDES at arm’s length, and reflect the terms and conditions for those types of loan. In Brazil there is no consolidated market valuefor long-term debts with the same characteristics of the financingBNDES loans, as credit offering of to entities in general with this long-term characteristic is usually restricted to the same amount recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2011.BNDES.

 

(iv)FinancingOther financing in foreignlocal currency are controlled in the original currency, converted using the exchange rate as of the balance sheetis valued at its nominal amounts plus contractual interest incurred through maturity date, discounted to present value considering anat the future exchangeinterest rate published by Bloomberg, based on the price of the shares negotiated in the open market.BM&F Bovespa’s website.

 

(v) Other financingAgreements with IADB, IBRD, were projected until final maturity in localorigin currency, are considered by carrying amount plus contractualapplying interest rate till mature date,rates contracted, discounted toat present value considering a future interestat Libor futures rate, obtained from Bloomberg. Eurobonds were priced at market value through quotes published by BM&F.Bloomberg. All the amounts obtained were translated into Brazilianreais at the exchange rate of December 31, 2012.

 

(vi)(vi)   Financial leaseAgreements with the JICA, were projected until final maturity in origin currency, using interest rates contracted and discounted at present value, at Tibor futures rate obtained from Bloomberg. The amounts obtained were translated into Brazilian reais at the exchange rate of December 31, 2012.

(vii)Leases are financial instruments valued at carryingtheir nominal amount plus contractual interest rate till matureincurred through maturity date, and are indexed by pre-fixedto fixed contractual interest rate, which is a specific rate and cannot be compared to any other rate available in the market. The Company considers the marketfair value of the financing the same amount recognized in the financial statements as offor the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

4Critical accounting estimates and judgments

 

Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and on other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances

 

The Company makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressed below:

 

(a)Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

The Company records allowance for doubtful accounts in an amount that management considers sufficient to cover probable losses, based on an analysis of customer accounts receivable,trade receivables, in

F-32


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 2.8.2.6.

 

The methodology for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable requires significant estimates, considering a number of factors including historical collectionreceipt experience, current economic trends, estimates of forecast write-offs, the aging of the accounts receivable portfolio and other factors. While the Company believes that the estimates used are reasonable, actual results could differ fromthose estimates.

F-38


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

(b)Intangible assets arising from concession and program contracts

 

The Company recognizes as intangible the assets arising from concession contracts under IFRIC 12.agreements. The Company estimates the fair value of construction and other work on the infrastructure to recognize the cost of the intangible asset, which is recognized when the infrastructure is built and provided that it will generate future economic benefits. The great majority of the Company's contracts for service concession arrangements entered with each grantor is under service concession agreements in which the Company has the right to receive, at the end of the contract, a payment equivalent to the unamortized asset balance of the concession intangible asset, which in this case, are amortized over the useful life of the underlying physical assets, thus at the end of the contract, the remaining value of the intangible would be equal to the residual value of the related physical asset.

 

Concession intangible assets under Concession contractsagreements and Program contracts, in which, at the end of the contract, the Company has no right to receive a payment equivalent to the unamortized asset balance of the concession intangible, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset or the contract what incur first.period, whichever is shorter. Additional information on the accounting for intangible assets arising from concession contractsagreements is discloseddescribed in Note 2.12(a).2.10.

 

The recognition of fair value for the intangible assets arising on concession contractsagreements is subject to assumptions and estimates, and the use of different assumptions could affect the balances recorded. The estimated useful lives of the underlying assets also requires significant assumptions and estimates, which differentDifferent assumptions and estimates and changes in future circumstances, could affect the remaining useful lives of the intangible assets and can have a significant impact on the results of operations.operations.  

 

(c)          Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company reviews annually long-lived assets for indicators of impairment, primarily intangible assets arising from concession contracts, which include water and sewage system physical assets to be held and used in the business, for the purpose of determining and measuring impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The assets include the intangible asset of the concession contracts related to water and sewage systems.

In evaluating impairment of long-lived assets, the evaluation requires significant assumptions and estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, including projections of future operating income and cash flows, future growth rates, and the remaining useful lives of the assets and/or the period of the contract, among other factors. In addition, projections are computed over an extended period of time, which subjects those assumptions and estimates to an even larger degree of uncertainty. While the Company believes that the estimates used are reasonable, the use of different assumptions could materially affect the recoverable amount.

(d)          Provisions

 

The Company is party to a number of legal proceedings involving significant claims. These legal proceedings include, among other types,but are not limited to, tax, labor, civil, environmental, disputedisputes with customers and suppliers and other proceedings. Additional information of these legal proceedings is disclosed in Note 15. The Company accruesprovides for probable losses resulting from these claims and proceedings when theCompany determines that the likelihood that a loss has occurredlawsuits for which it is probable that an outflow of resources will be necessary to settle the liability and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated.  Therefore, the Company is required to make judgmentsJudgments regarding future events. As a resultevents, the results of the significant judgment required in assessing and estimating these provisions for contingencies, actual losses realized in future periods couldwhich may differ significantly from actual estimates and could exceed the amounts provisioned. Provisions are revised and adjusted to take into consideration changes in circumstances involved. Additional information of these legal proceedings is disclosed in Note 16.

(d)Pension benefits

The Company sponsors the defined benefit plan and the defined contribution plan, as described in Note 17.

The liability recognized in the balance sheet in relation to defined benefit pension plans is the present value of defined benefit obligation on the balance sheet date, less the fair valueof plan assets, and unrecognized actuarial gains and losses. The defined benefit obligation is calculated yearly by Management, with the assistance of independent actuaries, applying the projected credit unit method. The present value of defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows, using interest rates compatible with the market, which are denominated in currency in which benefits will be paid and with maturity terms close to those of corresponding pension plan obligation

F-33

F-39


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

 

(e)          Pension benefits

The present value of the pension obligations depends on a number of factors that are determined on an actuarial basis using a number of assumptions, which can differ materially from the real, due to the changes in economicDeferred income tax and market conditions. The assumptions used in determining the net cost (income) for pensions include the discount rate. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount of pension obligations.social contribution

 

The Company determinesrecognizes and settles taxes on income based on the appropriate discount rates atresults of operations verified according to the end of each year, which isBrazilian Corporate Law, taking into consideration the interest rate that should be used to determine the present value of estimated future cash outflows expected to be required to settle the pension obligations. The Company utilizes the interest rate of high quality private papers to determine the appropriate discount rate, which are in the same currencyprovisions of the paymentstax laws. Pursuant to IAS 12, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the accounting balances and the tax bases of the benefitsassets and which has the maturity date close to the respective obligation.liabilities.

   

Other key assumptionsThe Company regularly reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets and recognizes a provision for pension obligations areimpairment if it is probable that these assets will not be realized, based in part on current market conditions. Additional information on the pension plans under Plan G0historic taxable income, the projection of future taxable income and G1 is disclosedthe estimated period to reverse temporary differences. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in Note 16.provision for impairment of all or a significant amount of deferred tax assets.

 

5Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

December

 

December

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and banks

118,867

 

136,002

119,846

 

118,867

Cash equivalents

2,031,122

 

1,853,177

1,801,332

 

2,031,122

 

 

 

1,921,178

 

2,149,989

2,149,989

 

1,989,179

 

Cash and cash equivalents are denominated inReais. Cash equivalents are mainlyinclude cash, bank deposits, other high-liquidity short-term investments, represented by Bank Certificates of Deposit Certificates - CDB's,(CDBs), deposited in financial institutions controlled by the São Paulo State Government, which has maturity date lessBanco do Brasil, whose original maturities are lower than three months, which are convertible into a cash amount and are readysubject to be converted in cash and has an insignificant risk toof change the total amount.in value.

 

In December 2011, theThe average rateyield of such Cash equivalents was 100.19%financial investments corresponds to 101.01% of CDI (Interbank Deposit Certificates). Inin December 2010, the average rate was 99.2% of CDI.2012 (100.19% in December 2011).

 

6Restricted Cash

F-40


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousandsAs of reais, unless otherwise indicated


In December 31, 2011,2012, the restricted cash totaled R$ 99,72964,977 (R$ 302,57099,733 in 2010) and was recognized in the current asset. ApproximatelyDecember 2011), of which R$8,280 was related to BNDES guarantees and R$ 90,984 referred54,742 corresponded to proceeds from services provided to entities related to the Municipal Government of São Paulo, net of taxes, which include: day-care centres, schools, management offices, and health centres, whosetaxes. These funds shall be reinvested in the water and sewage system of the city of São Paulo.

 

 

7Customer Accounts ReceivableTrade Receivables

 

(a)       Balance sheet balances

F-34


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

December

 

December

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Private sector:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and special customers (i) (ii)

885,847

 

828,261

 

954,021

 

885,847

Agreements (iii)

249,929

 

250,300

 

249,470

 

249,929

 

 

 

1,135,776

 

1,078,561

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,203,491

 

1,135,776

Government entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

578,463

 

556,212

 

610,779

 

578,463

Federal

2,517

 

2,645

 

3,150

 

2,517

Agreements (iii)

182,381

 

170,892

 

181,271

 

182,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

763,361

 

729,749

 

795,200

 

763,361

 

 

 

Wholesale customers - Municipal governments: (iv)

 

 

 

Wholesale customers – Municipal governments: (iv)

 

 

 

 

Guarulhos

513,218

 

462,221

 

578,314

 

513,218

Mauá

244,204

 

220,228

 

281,398

 

244,204

Mogi das Cruzes

14,864

 

18,818

 

15,202

 

14,864

Santo André

547,764

 

489,486

 

620,276

 

547,764

São Caetano do Sul

1,955

 

3,537

 

2,072

 

1,955

Diadema

164,337

 

149,155

 

180,465

 

164,337

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wholesale customers

1,486,342

 

1,343,445

Total wholesale customers – Municipal governments

 

1,677,727

 

1,486,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unbilled revenue

457,321

 

391,822

Unbilled supply

 

425,843

 

457,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal

3,842,800

 

3,543,577

 

4,102,261

 

3,842,800

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(2,436,428)

 

(2,219,420)

 

(2,723,408)

 

(2,436,428)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1,406,372

 

1,324,157

 

1,378,853

 

1,406,372

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

1,072,659

 

971,318

 

1,043,166

 

1,072,659

Noncurrent (v)

333,713

 

352,839

 

335,687

 

333,713

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,378,853

 

1,406,372

 

 

 

 

 

(i)   General customers - residential and small and mid-sized companies.companies

(ii)  Special customers - large consumers, commercial, industries, condominiums and special billing consumers (industrial waste, wells, etc.).

(iii) Agreements - installment payments of past-due receivables, plus monetary restatement and interest.

(iv) Wholesale customers - municipal governments - This balance refers to the sale of treated water to municipalities, which are responsible for distributing to, billing and charging final customers. Some of these municipalities are questioning in court the tariffs charged by SABESP, and do not paywhich have full allowance for doubtful accounts.Additionally, the amounts in dispute. Theseoverdue amounts are not recognized as operational revenue, due to the uncertaintysubstantially included in the collection.allowance for doubtful account and are classified in noncurrent assets.

F-41

F-35


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The amounts past due, which are substantially included in the allowance for doubtful accounts, are classified in noncurrent assets pursuant to the changes below:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

Balance at the beginning of the year

1,486,342

 

1,343,445

Services provided

394,922

 

340,068

Collection – current year services

(165,967)

 

(167,024)

Collection – previous years’ services

(37,570)

 

(30,147)

 

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the year

1,677,727

 

1,486,342

 

 

 

 

Current

33,924

 

26,485

Noncurrent

1,643,803

 

1,459,857

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

1,343,445

 

1,182,744

 

1,074,368

 

Services provided

340,068

 

353,546

 

332,975

 

Receipts - services in the current year

(167,024)

 

(183,882)

 

(164,266)

 

Receipts - services in previous years

(30,147)

 

(8,963)

 

(60,333)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

1,486,342

 

1,343,445

 

1,182,744

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

26,485

 

38,665

 

68,898

 

Noncurrent

1,459,857

 

1,304,780

 

1,113,846

 

 

(v)  The noncurrent portion consists of trade accounts receivablereceivables that are past due and renegotiated with customers and amounts past due related to wholesale to municipal governments, and the amounts are net of allowance for doubtful account.

 

(b)       The aging of trade accounts receivablereceivables is as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

Current

1,096,055

 

1,129,981

Past-due:

 

 

 

Up to 30 days

197,936

 

184,958

From 31 to 60 days

97,426

 

79,720

From 61 to 90 days

61,527

 

50,020

From 91 to 120 days

50,729

 

39,686

From 121 to 180 days

89,297

 

70,037

From 181 to 360 days

139,788

 

137,039

Over de 360 days

2,369,503

 

2,151,359

 

 

 

 

Total past-due

3,006,206

 

2,712,819

 

 

 

 

Total

4,102,261

 

3,842,800

 

December

 

December

 

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Current

1,129,981

 

1,086,344

Past-due:

 

 

 

Up to 30 days

184,958

 

150,358

From 31 to 60 days

79,720

 

67,539

From 61 to 90 days

50,020

 

45,153

From 91 to 120 days

39,686

 

39,084

From 121 to 180 days

70,037

 

73,300

From 181 to 360 days

137,039

 

119,967

Over 360 days

2,151,359

 

1,961,832

 

 

 

 

Total past-due

2,712,819

 

2,457,233

 

 

 

 

Total

3,842,800

 

3,543,577

 

(c)       Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

2011

 

2010

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previous balance

2,219,420

 

1,854,231

Balance at the beginning of the year

2,436,428

 

2,219,420

 

1,854,231

Private sector/government entities

47,679

 

200,321

126,823

 

83,094

 

294,342

Recoveries

(49,183)

 

(35,415)

 

(94,021)

Wholesale customers

169,329

 

164,868

209,340

 

169,329

 

164,868

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions for the year

217,008

 

365,189

286,980

 

217,008

 

365,189

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

2,436,428

 

2,219,420

Balance at the end of the year

2,723,408

 

2,436,428

 

2,219,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

1,132,638

 

1,075,939

1,242,967

 

1,132,638

 

1,075,939

Noncurrent

1,303,790

 

1,143,481

1,480,441

 

1,303,790

 

1,143,481

 

The Company accounted for probable losses on accounts receivable in 2011 totaling R$ 120,260 (December 31, 2010 – R$ 232,505), of which R$ 77,905 (net of recoveries) were written off from accounts receivable (in 2010 - R$ 37,505), under Selling expenses.

F-42F-36


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

 

Reconciliation of allowance for losses to the income statement

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses (write-off)

79,454

 

77,905

 

37,505

Allowance for state entities (related parties)

35,142

 

-

 

-

Allowance for private sector/government entities

126,823

 

83,094

 

294,342

Reversal of wholesale supply

-

 

(5,324)

 

(5,321)

Recoveries

(49,183)

 

(35,415)

 

(94,021)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

192,236

 

120,260

 

232,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company does not rely on any specific majorhave customers and no single external customer segmentrepresentsaccounting for 10% or more of its revenues.

F-43


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

8Related Party          Related-party Balances and Transactions

 

The Company is a party to transactions with its controlling shareholder, the State Government, and companies related to itit.

 

(a)       Accounts receivable,Receivables, interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity payable, and revenue and expenses with the State Government of São Paulo State Government

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Receivables

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

Water and sewage services (i)

113,027

 

116,441

GESP Agreement (iii), (iv) and (v)

-

 

41,360

Allowance for losses (i)

(47,531)

 

(12,389)

Reimbursement for pension benefits paid -

 

 

 

Gesp Agreement (ii) and (vi)

35,278

 

31,887

Reimbursement for pension benefits paid -

 

 

 

Monthly flow (ii) and (vi)

8,499

 

8,034

 

 

 

 

Total current

109,273

 

185,333

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent:

 

 

 

Reimbursement for pension benefits paid -

 

 

 

GESP Agreement (ii) and (vi)

153,098

 

170,288

 

 

 

 

Total noncurrent

153,098

 

170,288

 

 

 

 

Total receivables from shareholder

262,371

 

355,621

 

 

 

 

Water and sewage services

65,496

 

145,412

Reimbursement of additional retirement and

 

 

 

pension benefits

196,875

 

210,209

 

 

 

 

Total

262,371

 

355,621

 

 

 

 

Interest on shareholders’ equity payable to related parties

228,214

 

153,368

F-37

   

 

December

 

December

 

31, 2011

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

Water and sewage services (i)

116,441

 

96,004

GESP Agreement (iii)

41,360

 

21,360

Allowance for losses (i)

(12,389)

 

(12,389)

Reimbursement for pension benefits paid -

 

 

 

GESP Agreement (ii)

31,887

 

28,203

Reimbursement for

 

 

 

pension benefits paid - Monthly flow (ii)

8,034

 

4,594

 

 

 

 

Total current

185,333

 

137,772

 

 

 

 

Non-current:

 

 

 

Water and sewage services - GESP

 

 

 

Agreement (iii)

-

 

52,228

Reimbursement for

 

 

 

pension benefits paid - GESP Agreement (ii)

170,288

 

178,848

 

 

 

 

Total noncurrent

170,288

 

231,076

 

 

 

 

Total receivables from shareholder

355,621

 

368,848

 

 

 

 

Provision of water and sewage services

145,412

 

157,203

Reimbursement of additional retirement and

 

 

 

pension benefits

210,209

 

211,645

 

 

 

 

Total

355,621

 

368,848

 

 

 

 

Interest on shareholders' equity payable to related party

153,368

 

179,319

F-44


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Gross revenue from sales and services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water supply

216,933

 

204,595

 

193,771

228,890

 

216,933

 

204,595

Sewage services

188,059

 

178,935

 

164,532

202,094

 

188,059

 

178,935

Payments received from related parties

(425,129)

 

(401,626)

 

(349,983)

Collection from related parties

(481,204)

 

(425,129)

 

(401,626)

Financial income

271,847

 

137,613

 

73,927

161,552

 

271,847

 

137,613

 

 

 

 

 

Collection of GESP reimbursement referring to Law 4819/58

104,426

 

89,505

 

92,215

 

(i)        Water and sewage services

 

The Company provides water supply and sewage collection services to the São Paulo State Government and other companies related to it in accordance considered by management,  aswith usual market terms and conditions, as considered by management, except for the settlement of receivables which may occur as mentioned incan be made according to items (iii), (iv) and (v).

An allowance for losses of amounts past due for more than 360 days has been set up due to the uncertainty involving these receipts (R$47,531 in 2012 and R$12,389 in 2011).

 

(ii)       Reimbursement for pension benefits paid

 

Refers to amounts of supplementary retirement and pension benefits provided for in State Law 4,819/4819/58 ("Benefits") paid by the Company to former employees and pensioners.

 

Under the Agreement referred on item (iii) with the São Paulo State Government ("GESP" or the "State"), dated December 11, 2001, GESP recognizes its liability from charges arising from the Benefits, provided that the payment criteria set forth by the State Department of Personnel (DDPE), based on legal guidance of the Legal Consultancy of the Department of Finance and of the State Attorney General's Office (PGE).

 

As discussed on item (vii)(vi), during the assessment of the debt due from GESP to the Company there were certain divergences in the calculation and eligibility criteria of the benefits paid by the Company on behalf of GESP.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, 2,459, 2,492 and 2009, 2,492, 2,554 and 2,597 retired employees, respectively, received additional retirement benefits, and for the years endedDecember 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, the Company paid R$ 132,704, R$124,421 R$ 118,408 and R$ 116,082118,408, respectively. There were 1427 active employees as of December 31, 20112012 who will be entitled to these benefits as a result to their retirement as compared to 3236 as of December 31, 20102011 and 9162 as of December 31, 2009.2010.

F-38


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

In January 2004, the payments of supplement retirement and pension benefits were transferred to the Department of Finance and would be made in accordance with the calculation criteria determined by the PGE. As a result of a court decision, the responsibility for making the payments returned to SABESP, as originally established.

 

(iii)     GESP Agreement

 

On December 11, 2001, the Company, the São Paulo State Government (through the State Department of Finance Affairs, currently Department of Finance) and the Water and Electricity Department (DAEE), with the intermediation of the State Department of Sanitation and Energy (former Department of Water Resources, Sanitation and Construction Works), entered into the Obligations, Payment Commitment and Other Covenants Acknowledgement and Consolidation Agreement ("GESP Agreement") for the settlement of outstanding debts between GESP and the Company related to the provision of water supply and sewage services, and to the Benefits.retirement benefits.

F-45


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

In view of the strategic importance of the Taiaçupeba, Jundiaí, Biritiba, Paraitinga and Ponte Nova reservoirs for ensuring and maintaining the UpperAlto Tietê water volume, the Company agreed to receive them as partial repayment of the reimbursement related to the Benefits. The DAEE would transfer the reservoirs to the Company, replacing the amount owed by GESP. However, the São Paulo State Public Prosecution Office challenged the legal validity of this agreement, and its main argument is the absence of a specific legislative authorization for disposal of DAEE's assets. The Company's Management, with assistance of its legal advisors, assessassessed the risk of loss in this lawsuit as probable, in case the legislative authorization is not obtained, which would hinder the transfer of the related reservoirs as a partial settlement of the balance receivablereceivable. For further information see item (vi) below. 

 

(iv)      First Amendment to the GESP Agreement

 

On March 22, 2004, the Company and the São Paulo State Government amended the terms of the original GESP Agreement, (1) consolidating and recognizing the amounts due by the São Paulo State Government for water supply and sewage collection services provided, monetarily adjusted for inflation through February 2004; (2) formally authorizing the offset of amounts due by the São Paulo State Government with interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity declared by the Company and any other debt owed to the São Paulo State Government as of December 31, 2003, monetarily adjusted for inflation through February 2004; and (3) defining the payment conditions of the remaining liabilities of the São Paulo State Government for the receipt of the water supply and sewage services.

  

(v)       Second Amendment to the GESP Agreement

 

On December 28, 2007, the Company and the São Paulo State Government, represented by the Department of Finance, signed the second amendment to the terms of the original GESP Agreement, agreeing upon the payment in installments of the remaining balance of the First Amendment, amounting to R$133,709 at November 30, 2007, to be paid in 60 monthly and consecutive installments of the same amount, beginning on January 2, 2008. The amount of the installments will be monetarily restated accordinglast installment was paid in December 2012.

F-39


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the fluctuationFinancial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of the IPCA-IBGE, plus interest of 0.5% per month.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The State and SABESP agreed on immediately resuming their compliance with their mutual obligations under new assumptions: (a) implementation of an electronic bill management system to facilitate and speed up the monitoring of payment processes and budget management procedures; (b) structuring of the Rational Water Use Program (PURA) to rationalize the consumption of water and the amount of the water and sewage bills under the responsibility of the State; (c) establishment, by the State, of criteria for budgeting so as to avoid the reallocation of amounts to a specific water and sewage accounts as from 2008; (d) possibility of registering state bodies and entities in a delinquency system or reference file; (e) possibility of interrupting water supply to state bodies and entities in the case of nonpayment of water and sewage bills.

 

(vi) Third Amendment to the GESP Agreement

 

On November 17, 2008, GESP, SABESP and DAEE signed the third amendment to the GESP Agreement, through which GESP recognized a debt balance payable to SABESP totaling R$915,251, monetarily adjusted for inflation up to September 2008 in accordance with the fluctuation of the IPCA-IBGE, corresponding to the Undisputed Reimbursement, (see item (iii) above), determined by FIPECAFI. SABESP accepted on a provisional basis the reservoirs (see item (iii) above) as part of the payment of the Undisputed Reimbursement and offered to GESP a provisional settlement, recognizing a credit totalingR$696,283, corresponding to the value of the reservoirs in the UpperAlto Tietê system. The Company did not recognize the reimbursement receivable of R$696,283 related to the reservoirs, as it is not virtually certain that will be transferred by the State. The final settlement will only be effected with the actual transfer of the property with the proper Registry of Deeds Office. The remaining balance totaling R$218,967 is being paid in 114 monthly, consecutive installments,totaling R$1,920 each, including the annual IPCA/FIPE fluctuation, plus interest of 0.5% p.m., the first of which fell due on November 25, 2008.

F-46


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

The Company and the São Paulo State Government are working together to obtain legislative authorization to transfer the reservoirs to SABESP, overcoming the uncertainties arising from the public lawsuit challenging the absence of a specific legislative authorization for the transfer of the property of the reservoirs.

 

In addition, the third amendment provides for the regularization of the monthly flow of benefits. While SABESP is liable for the flow of monthly payment of benefits, the State shall reimburse SABESP based on the criteria identical to those applied when determining the Undisputed Reimbursement. Should there be no preventive court decision, the State will assume the flow of monthly payment of benefits portion deemed as undisputed.

 

(vii)    Controversial Amount of Benefits

 

As mentioned before, on November 17, 2008 the Company and the State signed the third amendment to the GESP Agreement, when the reimbursements called disputed and undisputed were quantified. The amendment established the efforts to calculate the so-called Disputed Reimbursement of the Benefits. Under the fourth clause of the amendment, the Disputed Reimbursement represents the difference between the Undisputable Reimbursement and the amount actually paid by the Company as pension benefits and pensioners set out in Law 4,819/58, for which, the Company understands, the State of São Paulo is originally liable, but paid by SABESP by May 2008, under a court order.

 

By entering into the third amendment, the State's Legal Representative (PGE) agreed to reassess the differences that gave rise to the disposed reimbursement of benefits set out in Law 4,819/58. At the time, the expectation was based on the willingness of the PGE to reanalyze the issue and the implied right of the Company to the reimbursement, including based on opinions from outside legal advisors.

 

However, new opinions issued by the PGE and received on September 4 and 22, 2009 andJanuary 4, 2010, refute the reimbursement of the largest portion of theamount previously defined as controversial amount.

F-40


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Even though the negotiations with the State are still in progress, it is not possible to assure that the Company will recover amicably (without dispute) the receivables related to the Disputed Reimbursement without dispute.Reimbursement.

 

As part of the actions intended to recover the receivables that management considers due by the State, related to discrepancies in the reimbursement of the pension benefits paid by the Company, the Company: (i) on March 24, 2010, reported to the controlling shareholder the official letter approved by the executive committee, proposing that the matter be discussed at the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBovespa) Arbitration Chamber; (ii) in June 2010, presented to Department of Finance a proposal to solve the outstanding items, such proposal was not accepted; (iii) on November 9, 2010, filed a judicial action against the State of São Paulo pleading the entire reimbursement related to employee benefits set out in Law 4,819/58 to finalize the discussionbetween the Company and GESP. TheDespite the legal action the Company will persist to obtain an agreement with GESP since the management believes that it is the better to the Company and to its shareholders than wait until the end of the judicial action.

F-47


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

The Company's management decided to not recognize the reimbursements which were not considered virtually certain that will be reimbursed by the State. As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the amounts not recorded by the Company, related to the pension benefits paid on behalf of the State by the Company, totaled R$ 1,290,6631,351,210 and R$ 1,230,064,1,290,663, respectively, including the amount of R$696,283 related to the transfer of the reservoirs in the UpperAlto Tietê system. As a result, the Company also recognized the obligation related to the pension benefit obligations maintained with the beneficiaries and pensioners of Plan G0, whose right it is to be paid by SABESP and is not considered virtually certain that SABESP will be reimbursed by the State.G0. As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the pension benefit obligations of Plan G0 totaled R$ 1,512,0781,547,161 and R$ 1,316,706,1,512,078, respectively. For detailed information on the pension benefit obligations refer to Note 16.17.

 

(b)       Agreements for the use of reservoirs

 

In its operations, the Company uses the Guarapiranga and Billings reservoirs, which are ownedalso used by another entity controlled by the São Paulo State Government; shouldGovernment, according to grants from the relevant competent body and in compliance with the prevailing legislation.

EMAE has requested the payment of the receivable and to financial compensation for the use of water from these reservoirs, and the reimbursement of damages related to the nonpayment in due time.

The Company understands that no amounts are due for the use of these reservoirs but it is responsible for their maintenance and operating costs. Should these reservoirs not be available for use to the Company, there could be the need to collect water in more distant places. places and there would be the risk of making services in the region unfeasible and increasing sourcing cost.

Three lawsuits were filed, two of them requesting injunctions to toll the statute of limitations and another to seek a decision by arbitration, as prescribed by an arbitration clause in the agreement entered into between the São Paulo State Government and former Light, in 1958.

The Company does not pay any fee for the use of these reservoirs butplaintiff understands that diverging opinions with SABESP should be resolved in anArbitration Court, an opinion disputed by SABESP, which in turn claims it is responsible for their maintenancenot bound to an agreement in which its predecessor only participated as intervening party.

F-41


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and operating costs.2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

In February 2012, the decision to submit to arbitration was established by the judge during the first hearing, which is subject to appeal.  Notwithstanding, if an arbitration proceeding is filed, we will take all available judicial actions to defend our position.  The Company’s management assessed this risk as possible loss and considers that it is not possible to estimate the total amount involved in this process since the extent was not determined.

 

(c)       Agreements with reduced tariffs with State and Municipal Government Entities that joined the Water Rational Water Use Program (PURA).

 

The Company has signed agreements with government entities related to the State Government and municipalities where it operates that benefit from a reduction of 25% in the tariff of water supply and sewage services when they are not in default. These agreements provide for the implementation of the rational water use program, which takes into consideration the reduction in the consumption of water.

 

(d)       Guarantees

 

The State Government provides guarantees for some loans and financing of the Company and does not charge any fee with respect to such guarantees.

 

(e)       Personnel assignment agreement among entities related to the State Government

 

The Company has personnel assignment agreements with entities related to the State Government, under which the expenses are fully passed on and monetarily reimbursed. In 2011,2012, the expenses related to personnel assigned by SABESP to other state government entities amounted to R$12,298 (R$10,888 (2010 -in December 2011 and R$ 5,640 and 2009 - R$ 5,359)in December 2010).

 

In 2011 there was noNo expenses related to personnel assigned by other entities to SABESP.SABESP were recorded at December 31, 2012 and 2011. In 2010, the expenses related to personnel assigned by other entities to SABESP totaled R$264 and in 2009 totaled R$ 335.264.

 

(f)        Services obtained from state government entities related to the State Government

 

As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, SABESP had an outstanding amount payable of R$ 12,062958 and R$ 11,395,12,062, respectively, for services rendered by São Paulo State Government entities, including thesupply of electric power by Companhia Energética de São Paulo – CESP, which represents 86% in 2011.entities.

F-48


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

(g)       NonoperatingNon-operating assets

 

As of December 31, 20112012, the Company had an amount of R$ 21,531 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 25,371) mainly969 related to free land lend to the associations, support entities, non-governmental organizations andlent to DAEE (Water and Electricity Department), among others. The free land lend to DAEE amounts to R$ 2,289. (R$2,289 in December 2011 and 2010).

 

(h)          Banco do Brasil

The State of Sao Paulo sold exclusive rights in the provision of banking services administration entities directly and indirectly in favor of Banco Nossa Caixa, on March 27, 2007, and in favor of Banco do Brasil, May 27, 2010. Through the lawsuit in question, SABESP pleads financial compensation for the sale of its exclusive rights, requiring a percentage of the values that the State of São Paulo received from each of the financial institutions.

On June 28, 2011 it was executed the Term of Settlement between the Company and the State of Sao Paulo, whereby the Company received the amount of R$ 63,366 upon reduction, as compensation of credit held by the State, corresponding to interests on shareholders’ equity in fiscal 2010.

(i)       SABESPREV

 

The Company sponsors a private defined benefit pension plan, which is operated and administered by Fundação SABESPSabesp de Seguridade Social - SABESPREV. The net actuarial liability recognized as of December 31, 20112012 amounted to R$577,169 (R$538,619 (Decemberin December 31, 2010 - R$ 487,332)2011) according to Note 17 (b).

 

(j)           Key(i)        Compensation of key management compensationpersonnel

 

Management Fees:Compensation:

F-42


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

SABESP's compensation policy for directorsthe Management and officers is set out according to guidelines of the State Government of São Paulo, State Government, the CODEC (State Capital protectionProtection Board), and arecompensation is based on performance, market competitiveness, or other indicators related to the Company's business and is subject to the shareholders’ approval by shareholders at an Annual Shareholders' Meeting.

 

Officers' compensation is limited to the compensation of the State Governor, and the Board of Directors' compensation is equivalent to 30 percent of the executive committee' overall compensation, contingent on attendance of at least one monthly meetingmeeting.

 

The objective of the compensation policy is to set a private sector management paradigm to retain its staff and recruit competent, experienced and motivated professionals, considering the level of management efficiency currently required by the Company.

 

In addition to monthly fee, the members of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee receive:

 

Bonuses:

 

For the purposes of compensating directors and officers of the companies where the State is the controlling shareholder, as an incentive policy, providing the company records quarterly, half-yearly, and yearly profits, and distributes mandatory dividends to shareholders, even if in the form of interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity. Annual bonuses cannot exceed the lower of six times the monthly compensation of the officers/directors nor 10 percent of the interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity paid by the company.

F-49


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Annual award:reward:

 

Equivalent to aone monthly fee, calculated on a prorated basis in December of each year.

 

The purpose of this awardreward is to correspond to the thirteenth salary paid to Company employees, as officers and directors' relationship with the Company is governed by its bylaws and not the labor code.

 

Benefits:Benefits paid only to statutory officers - meal ticket, basket of food staples, medical care, weekly paid rest typified as a paid leave of 30 calendar days, and payment of a premium equivalent to one third of the monthly fee.

 

TheExpenses related to the compensation related to the members of its board of directors and officers amounted to R$3,211, R$2,614 and R$ 2,601 and R$ 2,606 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010, and 2009,2010, respectively, and it refersthey refer to salaries and other short-term benefits to employees and management.benefits. An additional amount of R$ 1,069,1,074, related to the bonus program, alsowas recorded in 2012 (R$1,069 in December 2011 and R$ 845 in December 31, 2010).

(j)        Loan agreement through credit facility

The Company holds interests in some companies, not holding the majority interest but with power of veto in some issues. Therefore, these companies are considered for accounting purposes as jointly controlled entities, and are proportionately consolidated.

F-43


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The Company entered into a short term benefit, was accrued asloan agreement through credit facility with the Águas de Andradina S.A., Águas de Castilho S.A., and Aquapolo Ambiental S.A. to finance the operations of these companies, until the loans and financing required to banks are cleared.

The contracts signed on January 19, 2012 with Águas de Andradina and Águas de Castilho were settled in July 2012, according to the agreement’s provisions. On July 18, 2012, new agreements were signed with both companies, pursuant to the terms and conditions in the table below. The agreement signed with Aquapolo Ambiental on March 30, 2012 remains with the same features, according to the table below:

Companies

 

Credit limit

 

Principal disbursed

 

Interest balance

 

Interest rate

 

Maturity

Águas de Andradina

 

3,467

 

1,427

 

21

 

SELIC + 3.5% p.a.

 

07/17/2013

Águas de Castilho

 

675

 

403

 

6

 

SELIC + 3.5% p.a.

 

07/17/2013

Aquapolo Ambiental

 

5,629

 

5,629

 

519

 

CDI + 1.2% p.a.

 

04/30/2016

Aquapolo Ambiental

 

19,000

 

19,000

 

1,076

 

CDI + 1.2% p.a.

 

04/30/2015

Total

 

28,771

 

26,459

 

1,622

 

 

 

 

The amount disbursed is recognized in assets, in “Other receivables” and amounts to R$1,830 for principal and R$27 for interest recognized in current assets and R$24,629 for principal and R$1,595 for interest in noncurrent assets. As of December 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 -2012, the balance of principal and interest of these contracts is R$ 845; December 31, 2009 –28,081. In 2012, financial income was impacted by R$ 856).

1,672, referring to these loans; of which R$1,622 refers to outstanding agreements and R$50 refers to agreements settled in July 2012.

 

9Indemnities Receivable

(i)        Diadema

 

Indemnities receivable are a noncurrent assetassets that represents amounts receivable from the Municipalitymunicipality of Diadema as an indemnity for theirits unilateral termination of the concession for water supply and sewage services of the Company in 1995. As of December 31, 2011, this balance totaled R$60,295. As of December 31, 2010, the indemnities receivable was R$146,213 related to the municipalities of Diadema R$ 60,295 and Mauá R$85,918.

 

The Company invested in the construction of water and sewage systems in the municipalities of Diadema and Mauá in order to meet the concession service commitments. For the unilateral termination of the Diadema and Mauá concessions, the municipalities assumed the responsibility of supplying water and sewage services in those regions. At that time, the Company reclassified the balances of property, plant and equipment related to the assets used in those municipalities to noncurrent assets (indemnities receivable).

 

As of December 31, 2011, the net bookThe residual value of property, plant, and equipment items relating to the municipality of Diadema, reclassified in December 1996 amounted towas R$75,231, and the indemnity balanceindemnities receivable from the municipality amounted to R$60,295 onat December 31, 2011. In December 2012, an allowance account of R$60,295 was recorded, corresponding to the total receivable held by the Company.

 

SABESP filed lawsuits to collect the amounts due by the municipalities. With respect to Diadema,It proposed the decisionenforcement of the lower court judge was unfavorable to SABESP. The Company filed an appeal and in December 2005, SABESP's appeal to have the agreementsettlement entered into with the municipality of Diadema declared valid was partially accepted. In December 2007, the decision that accepted the execution of the andCompanhia de Saneamento de Diadema – Saned related to the Diadema - Sanedpayment of indemnity, and a motion to stay the execution was rendered, ordering this company to be summoned to payfiled by the full amountmunicipality of Diadema. In July 2008, the debt within 15 days under the penalty of fine. The judge approved the seizure of cash from Saned's bank accounts and short-term investments (online seizure) of up to 10% of the adjusted debt. An appeal was filed against this decision, butdebt, and the Appellate Court upheld the final and unappealable decision.amount of R$2,919 were seized and withdrawn on March 3, 2009. Subsequently, the Court of Justice issued an injunction determining the seizure through weekly deposits by Saned in the amount corresponding to 20% of everything received in its bank accounts and short-term investments. Saned filed appeals against this decision, and currently an interlocutory appeal filed at the Federal Supreme Court is pending judgment.

F-50

F-44


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

InA court decision was issued in October 2009 a judicial decision recognizedon the motion to stay execution filed by the municipality of Diadema that recognizes the existence and collectability of the debt and affirming that the execution against the municipality which will pay using precatory. InMunicipality should be made through certificate of judgment debt of the government. SABESP and the municipal government appealed against this decision. SABESP obtained favorable decision in September, 2011 from the Company received a favorable decision fromSpecial Department of the Court of Justice, consideringaffirming to be constitutional the municipal law which permittedthat allowed blocking the retentiontransfers of ICMS made by the ICMS. State Government to the municipality (instead of payment only through a court-ordered debt bond). In July 2012, Sabesp’s appeal was partially upheld and the judge sentenced the continuance of execution by blocking the transfers of ICMS made by the State of São Paulo to the municipality of Diadema.

 

On December 29, 2008, Saned and the Municipality of Diadema entered into a Letter of Intent with the São Paulo State and SABESP for the purpose of preparing studies and conducting negotiations to guide Diadema's and SABESP's decisions, aiming to establish SABESP as the exclusive provider of water supply and sewage services for the City of Diadema.

The parties agree thatDiadema, by means of an amicable settlement for the settlement of theconflicts currently existing conflicts between the companies is indispensable for the proper development of the public utility services of water supply and sewage services in the municipality of Diadema.companies.

 

In January 2009, the parties filed a joint petition requesting the suspension of new seizures, for a three-month period, trying to enable an agreement. The suspension was confirmed by the Tax Court. As the settlement on which a possible agreement will be based was maintained, the suspension request was last renewed in November 2011.March 2012.

In December 2012, SABESP resumed the execution through the freeze (pledge) of ICMS transfers to the Municipality of Diadema. After the issue of a court order to freeze the transfers, a supersedeas effect was granted to the extraordinary appeal filed by the Municipality of Diadema against the court’s decision that authorized the continuation of the execution by means of the transfer pledge.

Currently, the freeze of transfers is suspended and awaiting the judgment on the appeal filed by the Municipality of Diadema against the decision that sentenced the issue of the court order, as well as the analysis of request for reconsideration submitted by SABESP in view of decision that granted the supersedeas effect to the extraordinary.

In addition, SABESP carries on the negotiations to enter into a new agreement with the current administration of the Municipality of Diadema.

On the other hand, a public civil action filed by the Public Prosecution Office of the State of São Paulo against the agreement based on the execution filed against the municipality of Diadema and Saned is pending judgment and since 2004 has been waiting for engineering and accounting expert examination. After negotiations initiated with the municipality of Diadema, the Public Prosecution Office pleaded the dismissal of the public civil action, which was rejected and was object of an appeal by SABESP.

F-45


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(ii)       Mauá

 

As regards Mauá, a lower court decision was rendered determining that the Municipality pays the amount of December 31, 2011,R$153.2 million as compensation for the net bookinvestments made in the municipality by SABESP and for loss of profits. This award was confirmed by the Federal Supreme Court, in a final and unappealable decision, and SABESP has already resumed the execution in October 2012. The summons on the local government of Mauá and SAMA is currently pending.

The residual value of property, plant, and equipment relatingfixed assets related to the municipality of Mauá, reclassified in December 1999 totaledwas R$103,763, and the indemnities receivablesreceivable from the municipality totaledwere R$ 85,918. The85,918 at December 31, 2010. Court decisions are beinghave been favorable to the Company and the collection will be madereceipt of amounts due by precatory,municipality shall occur as certificate of judgment debt of the government, which will be recognized upon effective receipt, in view of uncertainties related to the settlement of amounts involved and the track record related to prioritizing payments of certificate of judgment debt of the government in the financial statements when realized, due to the uncertainties in the collection. Due to this fact, in December 2011, the Company recognized a provision for losses in the total amount and the judicial demand is still in progress.municipality of Mauá.

 

With respectIn December 2012 and 2011, the indemnity referring to Mauá, a lower court decision demanded this Municipality pay the amount of R$ 153.2 million to SABESP as a compensation for the investments made by SABESP in the city and for the loss of profits. In August 2008, the Court of Justice decided for the integral maintenance of the lower court decision. The Municipalitymunicipality of Mauá filed special and extraordinary appeals against the decision. Both appeals were denied by the Court of Justice, which led to the filing of a bill of review with the Superior Court of Justice and Federal Supreme Court. The Federal Supreme Court partially accepted the appeal to reduce the fees.was fully accrued.

 

Based on legal opinion, managementManagement believes that the Company has legal rights to receive the indemnities and is monitoring the judicial lawsuit.lawsuits.

10        Intangible Assets

(a)      Balance sheet balances (*)

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Cost

 

amortization

 

Net

 

Cost

 

amortization

 

Net

Intangibles arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service Concession agreements (i)

8,432,421

 

(1,511,981)

 

6,920,440

 

8,378,432

 

(1,630,664)

 

6,747,768

Concession contracts (ii)

1,402,854

 

(292,918)

 

1,109,936

 

1,252,422

 

(247,434)

 

1,004,988

Program contracts (iii)

5,288,541

 

(1,469,369)

 

3,819,172

 

3,914,369

 

(1,169,810)

 

2,744,559

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

627,989

 

(56,898)

 

571,091

 

473,327

 

(38,341)

 

434,986

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

10,604,942

 

(1,036,455)

 

9,568,487

 

9,781,799

 

(591,226)

 

9,190,573

New businesses (vi)

-

 

-

 

-

 

21,400

 

(4,923)

 

16,477

Software licenses

55,784

 

(52,988)

 

2,796

 

52,755

 

(50,429)

 

2,326

Total

26,412,531

 

(4,420,609)

 

21,991,922

 

23,874,504

 

(3,732,827)

 

20,141,677

F-51(b)      Changes

 

December 31, 2011

Additions

Contract renewal

Transfer

Write-offs and disposals

Amortization

December 31, 2012

Intangibles arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service Concession agreements (i)

6,747,768

984,630

(652,973)

(21,602)

(916)

(136,467)

6,920,440

Concession contracts – economic value (ii)

1,004,988

150,963

-

-

(14)

(46,001)

1,109,936

Program contracts (iii)

2,744,559

483,448

652,973

-

(3,095)

(58,713)

3,819,172

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

434,986

154,662

-

-

-

(18,557)

571,091

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

9,190,573

882,868

-

(49,486)

(5,977)

(449,491)

9,568,487

New businesses (vi)

16,477

-

-

(16,477)

-

-

-

Software licenses

2,326

3,029

-

-

-

(2,559)

2,796

Total

20,141,677

2,659,600

-

(87,565)

(10,002)

(711,788)

21,991,922

F-46


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

10 Intangible Assets

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

amortization

 

Net

 

Cost

 

amortization

 

Net

 

Intangible rights arising from

concession contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service concession

Agreements (i)

14,404,168

 

(2,848,829)

 

11,555,339

 

13,980,141

 

(3,242,270)

 

10,737,871

 

Concession contracts (ii)

762,987

 

(223,693)

 

539,294

 

706,423

 

(189,145)

 

517,278

 

Program contracts (iii)

1,120,104

 

(49,324)

 

1,070,780

 

900,686

 

(36,302)

 

864,384

 

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

473,327

 

(38,341)

 

434,986

 

333,942

 

(22,666)

 

311,276

 

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

7,039,763

 

(517,288)

 

6,522,475

 

6,196,699

 

(99,837)

 

6,096,862

 

New businesses (vi)

21,400

 

(4,923)

 

16,477

 

12,129

 

(901)

 

11,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,821,749

 

(3,682,398)

 

20,139,351

 

22,130,020

 

(3,591,121)

 

18,538,899

 

Software licenses

52,755

 

(50,429)

 

2,326

 

49,458

 

(41,521)

 

7,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

23,874,504

 

(3,732,827)

 

20,141,677

 

22,179,478

 

(3,632,642)

 

18,546,836

 

 

Movements on the intangible assets are as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2008

 

Additions

 

Write-off and disposals

 

Amortization

 

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2010

Additions

Contract renewal

Transfer

Write-offs and disposals

Amortization

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible rights arising on concession contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service concession agreements (i)

14,071,507

 

1,849,993

 

(51,778)

 

(497,607)

 

15,372,115

Intangibles arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

Service Concession agreements (i)

6,334,087

1,125,334

(403,786)

(63,487)

(16,228)

(228,152)

6,747,768

Concession contracts (ii)

509,724

 

17,429

 

-

 

(23,008)

 

504,145

982,973

2,166

-

57,718

(2,780)

(35,089)

1,004,988

Program contracts (iii)

622,383

 

162,466

 

-

 

(12,060)

 

772,789

2,134,377

225,510

403,786

(31)

(3,810)

(15,273)

2,744,559

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

249,639

 

18,424

 

-

 

(9,260)

 

258,803

311,276

139,385

-

(15,675)

434,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,453,253

 

2,048,312

 

(51,778)

 

(541,935)

 

16,907,852

Software licenses (vi)

9,602

 

12,954

 

-

 

(12,991)

 

9,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,462,855

 

2,061,266

 

(51,778)

 

(554,926)

 

16,917,417

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

8,764,958

930,961

-

(36,234)

(32,383)

(436,729)

9,190,573

New businesses (vi)

11,228

9,271

-

(4,022)

16,477

Software licenses

7,937

3,297

-

(8,908)

2,326

Total

18,546,836

2,435,924

-

(42,034)

(55,201)

(743,848)

20,141,677

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

Additions

 

Contracts renewal

 

Write-off and disposals

 

Amortization

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangibles arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service Concession agreements (i)

14,714,274

 

961,384

 

(8,959,148)

 

(15,857)

 

(366,566)

 

6,334,087

Concession contracts (ii)

810,267

 

196,695

 

-

 

-

 

(23,989)

 

982,973

Program contracts (iii)

1,124,508

 

724,226

 

300,173

 

-

 

(14,530)

 

2,134,377

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

258,803

 

62,748

 

-

 

-

 

(10,275)

 

311,276

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

-

 

205,820

 

8,658,975

 

-

 

(99,837)

 

8,764,958

New businesses (vi)

-

 

12,129

 

-

 

-

 

(901)

 

11,228

Software licenses

9,565

 

6,779

 

-

 

-

 

(8,407)

 

7,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

16,917,417

 

2,169,781

 

-

 

(15,857)

 

(524,505)

 

18,546,836

 

(*) The Company reclassified amounts among items within intangible assets note, changing neither the opening or closing balances nor the changes in line items, since this reclassification does not require changing the amortization rates, which did not represented any adjustment to the balance sheet, the income statement, the statement of cash flow, or equity.

This reclassification, to provide more accurate information, refers to items preceding the signatures of program contracts and service agreements that in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 were classified under “Concession contracts”. Previously existing items were classified as concession contracts prior to the signature of program contracts and service agreements.

 

December 31, 2009

 

Additions

 

 

 

Reclassification

 

Write-off and disposals

 

Amortization

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible rights on concession contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service concession agreements (i)

15,372,115

 

1,767,747

 

(6,019,568)

 

(15,857)

 

(366,566)

 

10,737,871

Concession contracts (ii)

504,145

 

37,122

 

-

 

-

 

(23,989)

 

517,278

Program contracts (iii)

772,789

 

106,125

 

-

 

-

 

(14,530)

 

864,384

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

258,803

 

62,748

 

-

 

-

 

(10,275)

 

311,276

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

-

 

177,131

 

6,019,568

 

-

 

(99,837)

 

6,096,862

New businesses (vi)

-

 

12,129

 

-

 

-

 

(901)

 

11,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,907,852

 

2,163,002

 

-

 

(15,857)

 

(516,098)

 

18,538,899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software licenses

9,565

 

6,779

 

-

 

-

 

(8,407)

 

7,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,917,417

 

2,169,781

 

-

 

(15,857)

 

(524,505)

 

18,546,836

F-47



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

Additions

 

 

 

Reclassification

 

Write-off and disposals

 

Amortization

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible rights on concession contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service concession agreements (i)

10,737,871

 

1,125,335

 

(63,487)

 

(16,228)

 

(228,152)

 

11,555,339

Concession contracts (ii)

517,278

 

2,167

 

57,718

 

(2,780)

 

(35,089)

 

539,294

Program contracts (iii)

864,384

 

225,510

 

(31)

 

(3,810)

 

(15,273)

 

1,070,780

Program contracts – commitments (iv)

311,276

 

139,385

 

 

-

 

-

 

(15,675)

 

434,986

Service contract – São Paulo (v)

6,096,862

 

930,959

 

(36,234)

 

(32,383)

 

(436,729)

 

6,522,475

New businesses (vi)

11,228

 

9,271

 

-

 

-

 

(4,022)

 

16,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,538,899

 

2,432,627

 

(42,034)

 

(55,201)

 

(734,940)

 

20,139,351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software licenses

7,937

 

3,297

 

-

 

-

 

(8,908)

 

2,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,546,836

 

2,435,924

 

(42,034)

 

(55,201)

 

(743,848)

 

20,141,677

The reclassification amountingamortization term of previously existing items transferred from “Service Concession agreements” to R$ 42,034 is related to“Concession contracts”, “Program Contracts” and “Services contract – São Paulo” are amortized over their useful lives, i.e. have the accounts “investment property”.same amortization criteria, regardless of the group they are classified.

 

The statusnet effects of our aggregated construction in progressthese reclassifications are the following: as of the underlyingDecember 31, 2011, (R$4,341,877) were reclassified from Service Concession agreements to program contract R$1,673,779 and to services contract R$2,668,098. As of December 31, 2010, (R$3,938,089) were reclassified from Service Concession agreements to program contract R$1,269,993 and to services agreements R$2,668,096. As of December 31, 2009, R$351,719 were reclassified from Service Concession agreements to program contracts. The total balances of intangible assets as of concession contracts at the end of the year is as follows:

 

As of December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction costs incurred

760,707

 

1,248,957

 

2,009,664

Recognized construction revenue

772,118

 

1,267,691

 

2,039,809

 

As of December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction costs incurred

1,028,115

 

1,052,966

 

2,081,081

Recognized construction revenue

1,051,419

 

1,079,265

 

2,130,684

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction costs incurred

1,044,122

 

1,142,198

 

2,186,320

Recognized construction revenue

1,066,524

 

1,168,254

 

2,234,778


Companhia de Saneamento BásicoDecember 31, 2011 and 2010 did not change.

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

There are no contingent assets or liabilities related to the construction contracts outstanding.

 

Investments committed(c)      Construction services

 

 

2012

 

Water

supply

 

Sewage services

 

Total

Construction revenue

1,054,851

 

1,419,761

 

2,474,612

Construction costs

1,036,456

 

1,387,341

 

2,423,797

The estimated amount related to investments is R$ 2,274 million to be spent from 2012 to 2015 (unaudited).

 

 

2011

 

Water

supply

 

Sewage services

 

Total

Construction revenue

1,066,524

 

1,168,254

 

2,234,778

Construction costs

1,044,122

 

1,142,198

 

2,186,320

 

2010

 

Water

supply

 

Sewage services

 

Total

Construction revenue

1,051,419

 

1,079,265

 

2,130,684

Construction costs

1,028,115

 

1,052,966

 

2,081,081

Intangible rights(d)      Intangibles arising from concession contracts

 

The Company operates concession contracts as defined by IFRIC 12 covering the provision of basic and environmental sanitation services, water supply and sewage services. These concession arrangementscontracts set out rights and obligations relativerelated to the infrastructure and to the public service (See Note 2.12(a)2.10 (a)). A general obligation also exists to return the concession infrastructure to the concession grantor in good working condition at the end of the concession.

 

As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the Company operates in 363 municipalities in the State of São Paulo. In most of these municipalitiescontracts operations are based on 30-year concession period. The agreement with the municipality of São Paulo is accounted for as a service concession arrangement.

 

The services provided by the Company are billed at a price establishedregulated and controlled by the "São Paulo State Sanitation and Energy Regulatory Agency (ARSESP).

Intangible assets arising on concession contracts include:

F-Agência Reguladora48


Companhia de Saneamento e EnergiaBásico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

" ("ARSESP"

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated).Intangible rights arising on concession

(i) Service Concession contracts are comprised of:

 

(i) ServiceThe concession agreements

The concession contracts state that the propertyassets will revertbe handed over to the concession grantor at the end of the period,agreement, through compensation for the residual value or marketfair value of the underlying physicaltangible assets in accordance with the stipulationsas set forth in each contractagreement, and amortization areis calculated usingon a straight-line basis, taking into consideration thestraight-line method, which consider useful lives of the physical assets economic useful lives.tangible assets.

 

(ii)       Concession contracts

 

From 1999 through 2006, the negotiations for new concessions were conducted based on the basis of the economic and financial profit or lossresults of the transaction, determined in a valuation report issued by independent appraisers.

 

The amount determined in the related contract,agreement, after the transaction is closed with the municipal authorities,municipality, realized through the subscription of the Company'sCompany shares or in cash, is recorded as "concession contract"in this line item and amortized over the period of the related concession period (usually 30 years). As of December 31, 2011, 20102012 and 20092011 there were no outstanding amounts pending related to these payments to the municipalities.

 

Intangible assets are amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis over the termshorter of the concession agreementsperiod or for the useful lives of the underlying assets, which was lower, entered into with the related municipality.assets.

 

(iii) Program contracts

F-54


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

NotesThese refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

It refers to the renewrenewal of contracts formerly denominated fullpreviously referred to as concession to operation concession, by program contracts whichwhose purpose is the water supply, sewage andto provide sanitation public service.services. The amortization of the assets acquired until the program contracts’ execution dates is calculated on a straight-line basis, taking into consideration the useful lives of the assets. Assets acquired or constructedbuilt after the program contracts’ execution dates are being amortized duringover the shorter of the contract period (30 years) or for the useful lives of the underlying assets, which was lower.assets.

 

(iv) Program contracts - Commitments

 

After the enactment of the regulatory framework law 11,445 in 2007, renewals of concession agreements areconcessions started to be made through" of program contracts".contracts. In some of these program contracts, the Company committedundertakes the commitment to financially participate in social and environmental sanitation actions. TheseThe assets built and financial commitments assumed within the program contracts are beingrecorded as intangible assets and are amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis according toover the effective periodduration of the program contract (mostly, 30 years).

 

AsIn 2012, amortization expenses related to the commitments of December 31,the program contract were R$18,557 (R$15,675 in 2011 theand R$10,275 in 2010).

The amounts not yet disbursed related to commitments under the program contracts are recorded in “Other obligations”“Program Contracts – Commitments” in current liabilities in(in the amount of (R$ 62,287R$148,220 and R$ 83,084),62,287 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively) and noncurrent liabilities in(in the amount of (R$ 130,978R$87,407 and R$ 66,856), as of130,978 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, respectively.respectively).

  

(v) ServiceServices contract - São Paulo

 

On November 14, 2007, the Company and the Municipality of São Paulo (the Parties) entered into an Agreement to establish the conditions that ensure the stability in the provision of water supply and sewage services, and environmental utility services in the city of São Paulo, the main provisions of which are as follows:

(a)       the Parties made the commitment to take basic sanitation and environmental actions, complementary to the actions of the Municipality of São Paulo, by investing in the deployment and continuity of programs such as: Programa Córrego Limpo (Clean River Program) and Programa de Uso Racional da Água - PURA (Rational Water Use Program), the purpose of which is to ensure a decrease in water consumption by City government units, ensuring water supply to and the quality of living of the population;

(b)       starting November 14, 2007, all the amounts paid by the Municipality of São Paulo to SABESP, referring to consumption by City departments, agencies, and foundations, net of taxes, will be used in basic sanitation and environmental actions in the municipality; and

(c)       the Municipality is  committed to restart the payment of consumption bills issued by SABESP, starting from November 14, 2007.

The payments referred on item (b) are not being recognized in a specific account related to basic sanitation services and environmental services. The remaining amount received and not yet distributed, on December 31, 2011 was R$ 86,956 (R$80,379 on December 31, 2010).

On June 23, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the State of São Paulo andthe Municipality of São Paulo approved by the Regulatory agency of Sanitation and Energy of the State of São Paulo - ARSESP, to regulate the provision of water and sewage services in the city of São Paulo for a 30‑year30-year period, which is extendable for an another 30‑year30-year period. The main terms of the agreement are as follow:

F-55

F-49


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Also on June 23, 2010, an agreement was signed between the state and municipal government, and SABESP and the São Paulo State Sanitation and Energy Regulatory Agency (“ARSESP”) are the consenting and intervening parties, whose main aspects are the following:

1.The State and the Municipality of São Paulo grant to SABESPSabesp the right to explore the sanitation service in the capital of the State of São Paulo, which consists of the obligation to such provide service and charge the respective tariff for this service;

 

2.The State and the Municipality sets forthdesignate ARSESP as the agency responsible for regulating the tariff, controlling and monitoring the services;

 

3.The evaluation model of the contract wasis the discounted cash flowflows, which considered the financial and economic sustainability of the operation;

 

4.All operationaloperating costs, taxes, investments and the opportunity cost of the investees and the creditors of SABESPSabesp were considered in the cash flow analysis;

 

5.The estimatedagreement provides for investments mentionedestablished in the agreement comply with the minimum of 13% of the gross revenue from the municipality of São Paulo, net of the taxes on revenues. The investment plan, considering theInvestment plans referring to Sabesp’s execution of SABESP, mustshall be compatible towith the activities and programs includedforeseen in the state, municipal sanitation plan ofplans, and where applicable, the State, Municipality, and if necessary, in the plan of the Metropolitan region.metropolitan plan. The investinvestment plan is not irrevocabledefinite and will be reviewedrevised by management committee eachManaging Committee every four years, specially theespecially as to investments to be executedmade in the subsequentfollowing period;

 

6.The payment related to the Municipal Fund of Environmental Sanitation and Infrastructure to be applied in the sanitation service within the municipality must be recovered through the tariffs charges. Such payment represents 7.5% of the totalgross revenue from the municipality of São Paulo, net of the taxes on revenue;

 

7.The opportunity cost of the investees and the creditors was established by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) methodology. The WACC was the interest rate used to discount the cash flow of the operation; and

 

8.The agreement considers the recovery of thenet assets in operation, preferably evaluated by external specialiststhrough equity valuation or by historical costs plus monetary indexation, to becarrying amount monetarily restated, as defined by ARSESP. There shouldIn addition, the agreement provides for the remuneration of investments to be made by SABESP, so that there is no residual amount of the assetsvalue at the end of the contract.agreement.

 

The agreement represents approximately 55.1%55% of the total revenue of the Company.Company, ensures the judicial and assets security, adequate return to shareholders and quality services to its customers.

 

The Company and the municipality of São Paulo and the Company did not achieveconclude an agreement to solve theequalize financial pending accounts in place inissues existing until the signature date of the contract signature,Agreement related to the rendering of water supply and sewage collection services provided to the propertyreal properties of the municipality. Due to this fact,municipality, reason that, the Company filed a lawsuitsuit to collect the amounts due by the municipality.these accounts, which are accrued for losses.

 

(vi) New businesses

 

In August 2009, the Company and Companhia de Saneamento de Alagoas – CASAL signed 60 month-period agreement to provide specialized technical services to implement a program to reduce the losses and retain revenues in the municipality of Maceio. The construction started in 2010.

 

As of December 31, 2011, the total amount recognized in “New businesses” caption amount to R$ 16,477 (R$ 11,228 in 2010), and the amount of CASAL amount to R$ 15,664 (December 31, 2010R$11,228).F-50

F-56


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(a)(e)      Disposals of underlying concession intangible assets

 

In 2011, 2010 and 2009,2012, the Company wrote off concession underlyingintangible assets items totaling R$ 55,202, R$ 15,85710,002 (R$55,201 in December 2011 and R$ 51,778, respectively,15,857 in December 2010), due to obsolescence, theft, misplacements,disposals and discontinued works, unproductive wells, and economically unfeasible projects, considered economically unfeasible.as well as those resulting from the completion of the inventory taking.

 

(b)(f)       Capitalization of interest and othersother financial charges

 

In 2011, 2010 and 2009,2012, the Company capitalized interest and inflation adjustment, including related foreign currency exchange effects,differences, inconcession intangible assets totaling R$283,016 at an average rate of 5.92% (R$261,886 in December 2011, at an average rate of 5.32% and R$228,899 in December 2010, at an average rate of 5.76%), during the construction period of the qualifying assets totaling R$ 261,886, R$ 228,899, and R$ 51,625, respectively.period.

 

(c)         Revenue from construction(g)      Construction margin

 

The Company isacts as a primary responsible to constructbuild and install the infrastructure related to the concession, contract, using its own resourcesefforts or contracting third parties to perform the work, beingby outsourcing services, and is significantly exposed to itsthe related risks and benefits.rewards.

 

The Company, therefore, recognizes revenue from construction relatedservice corresponding to the cost of construction costs added by gross margin.plus a fee earned. In general, the constructions regarding the concessionsconcession-related construction works are performed by third parties. In this case the margin is lower and it is to covercovers the costs ofconstruction management and supervisionthe assumption of the construction. Based on the studiesprimary risk. In 2012, and the benchmark with companies in the construction market2010 the margin used in 2011 was 2.3% (2010 was 2.6%).

 

The consolidated amount of the construction margin infor 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 was R$50,815, R$48,458 R$ 49,603, and R$ 30,145,49,603, respectively.

 

 (d)(h)      Expropriations

 

As a result of the construction of priority projects related to water and sewage systems, the Company was required to expropriate or establish rights of way in third-parties' properties, and the owners of these properties will be compensated either amicably or through courts.

 

The assets received as a result of expropriations are recorded asconcession intangible assetsafter the transaction is completed. In 2011, 2010 and 2009,2012, the total amount related to expropriations was R$34,731 (R$12,167 R$ 10,779in 2011 and R$ 6,244, respectively.10,779 in 2010).

 

(e)(i)       Assets pledged as guarantee

 

As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the Company had underlying physical assets totaling R$249,034 offered as guarantee to the request for the PAES (tax debt refinancing program) (Note 13)14).

 

(f)          Public-Private-Partnership(j)       Public-Private Partnership (PPP)

 

The Company and CAB-Sistema Produtor Alto TieteTietê S.A., special purpose entity, formed by Galvão Engenharia S.A. and Companhia Águas do Brasil – Cab Ambiental, signed in June 2008 the contract ofpublic-private-partnership of Alto TieteTietê production system.

F-57


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

The contract last 15 years which purpose is to expand the capacity of treated water of Taiaçupeba from 10 thousand to 15 thousand of liters per second. Thesecond, whose operation initiatedbegan in October 2011.

F-51


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

As of December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the amount recognized as intangible asset related to PPP was R$ 474,818426,791 and R$ 353,468,474,818, respectively.

 

(g)         Impairment (k)     Works in progress

The amount of R$5.1 billion is recorded as intangible assets from works in progress at December 31, 2012 (R$5.7 billion at December 31, 2011).

(l)       Amortization of intangible assets

The average amortization rate was 4.0% in 2012, 4.3% in 2011 and 3.2% in 2010.

 

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, no provision for impairment was recognized.

(h)         Construction in progress11         Investment property

 

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the constructionbalances of “Investment property”, land, totaled R$54,046 (R$52,585 in progress recognizedDecember 2011). As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of these properties totaled R$295,538 (R$284,670 in the intangible assets amounts to R$ 5.7 billion (R$ 5.3 billion in 2010)December 2011).

 

1112        Property, Plant and Equipment

(a)      Balance sheet balances

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Cost

 

depreciation

 

Net

 

Cost

 

depreciation

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

88,328

 

-

 

88,328

 

109,303

 

-

 

109,303

Buildings

233,048

 

(33,792)

 

199,256

 

39,574

 

(30,142)

 

9,432

Equipment

211,393

 

(131,480)

 

79,913

 

160,915

 

(100,626)

 

60,289

Transportation equipment

17,119

 

(10,455)

 

6,664

 

21,071

 

(19,549)

 

1,522

Furniture and fixtures

16,567

 

(10,270)

 

6,297

 

27,810

 

(27,601)

 

209

Other

1,448

 

(1,063)

 

385

 

2,758

 

(1,713)

 

1,045

Works in progress

2,540

 

-

 

2,540

 

174,668

 

-

 

174,668

 

570,443

 

(187,060)

 

383,383

 

536,099

 

(179,631)

 

356,468

 

(b)      Changes

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Write-offs and

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

Additions

 

Transfer

 

disposals

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

109,303

 

-

 

(20,349)

 

(626)

 

-

 

88,328

Buildings

9,432

 

2,743

 

190,896

 

(873)

 

(2,942)

 

199,256

Equipment

60,289

 

22,316

 

16,825

 

(510)

 

(19,007)

 

79,913

Transportation equipment

1,522

 

4,605

 

1,427

 

(7)

 

(883)

 

6,664

Furniture and fixtures

209

 

983

 

5,429

 

(41)

 

(283)

 

6,297

Other

1,045

 

-

 

(498)

 

-

 

(162)

 

385

Works in progress

174,668

 

-

 

(172,128)

 

-

 

-

 

2,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

356,468

 

30,647

 

21,602

 

(2,057)

 

(23,277)

 

383,383

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Cost

 

depreciation

 

Net

 

Cost

 

depreciation

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

109,303

 

-

 

109,303

 

119,567

 

-

 

119,567

Buildings

39,574

 

(30,142)

 

9,432

 

41,014

 

(28,983)

 

12,031

Equipment

160,915

 

(100,626)

 

60,289

 

162,270

 

(90,804)

 

71,466

Transportation equipment

21,071

 

(19,549)

 

1,522

 

20,025

 

(18,364)

 

1,661

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

27,810

 

(27,601)

 

209

 

26,831

 

(26,378)

 

453

Construction in progress

174,668

 

-

 

174,668

 

43,222

 

-

 

43,222

Other

2,758

 

(1,713)

 

1,045

 

2,590

 

(1,384)

 

1,206

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

536,099

 

(179,631)

 

356,468

 

415,519

 

(165,913)

 

249,606

 

 

Movements on the property, plant and equipment are as follows:F-52

 

December

 

 

 

Write-off and

 

 

 

December

 

31, 2008

 

Additions

 

Disposals

 

Depreciation

 

31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

106,227

 

14,193

 

(535)

 

-

 

119,885

Buildings

16,744

 

172

 

(20)

 

(1,341)

 

15,555

Equipment

47,760

 

4,870

 

(29)

 

(7,051)

 

45,550

Transportation equipment

1,172

 

1,262

 

-

 

(930)

 

1,504

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

6,334

 

6,756

 

(167)

 

(6,569)

 

6,354

Other

1,173

 

564

 

(4)

 

(151)

 

1,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

179,410

 

27,817

 

(755)

 

(16,042)

 

190,430

 

 

December

 

 

 

Write-off and

 

 

 

December

 

31, 2009

 

Additions

 

Disposals

 

Depreciation

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

119,885

 

-

 

(318)

 

-

 

119,567

Buildings

15,555

 

-

 

(210)

 

(3,314)

 

12,031

Equipment

45,550

 

41,251

 

-

 

(15,335)

 

71,466

Transportation equipment

1,504

 

1,831

 

-

 

(1,674)

 

1,661

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

6,354

 

1,079

 

-

 

(6,980)

 

453

Construction in progress

-

 

43,222

 

-

 

-

 

43,222

Other

1,582

 

-

 

-

 

(376)

 

1,206

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,430

 

87,383

 

(528)

 

(27,679)

 

249,606

F-58


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

December

 

 

 

 

 

Write-off and

 

 

 

December

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Write-offs and

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

31, 2010

 

Additions

 

Reclassification

 

Disposals

 

Depreciation

 

31, 2011

 

Additions

 

Transfer

 

disposals

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

119,567

 

-

 

(10,264)

 

-

 

-

 

109,303

119,567

 

-

 

(10,264)

 

-

 

-

 

109,303

Buildings

12,031

 

-

 

(287)

 

(3)

 

(2,309)

 

9,432

12,031

 

-

 

(287)

 

(3)

 

(2,309)

 

9,432

Equipment

71,466

 

9,940

 

-

 

(1,333)

 

(19,784)

 

60,289

71,466

 

9,940

 

-

 

(1,333)

 

(19,784)

 

60,289

Transportation equipment

1,661

 

1,050

 

-

 

(4)

 

(1,185)

 

1,522

1,661

 

1,050

 

-

 

(4)

 

(1,185)

 

1,522

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

453

 

1,081

 

-

 

(7)

 

(1,318)

 

209

Construction in progress

43,222

 

131,446

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

174,668

Furniture and fixtures

453

 

1,081

 

-

 

(7)

 

(1,318)

 

209

Other

1,206

 

174

 

-

 

-

 

(335)

 

1,045

1,206

 

174

 

-

 

-

 

(335)

 

1,045

Works in progress

43,222

 

131,446

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

174,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

249,606

 

143,691

 

(10,551)

 

(1,347)

 

(24,931)

 

356,468

249,606

 

143,691

 

(10,551)

 

(1,347)

 

(24,931)

 

356,468

 

 

December

 

 

 

Write-off and

 

 

 

December

 

31, 2009

 

Additions

 

Disposals

 

Depreciation

 

31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

119,885

 

-

 

(318)

 

-

 

119,567

Buildings

15,555

 

-

 

(210)

 

(3,314)

 

12,031

Equipment

45,550

 

41,251

 

-

 

(15,335)

 

71,466

Transportation equipment

1,504

 

1,831

 

-

 

(1,674)

 

1,661

Furniture and fixtures

6,354

 

1,079

 

-

 

(6,980)

 

453

Other

1,582

 

-

 

-

 

(376)

 

1,206

Works in progress

-

 

43,222

 

-

 

-

 

43,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,430

 

87,383

 

(528)

 

(27,679)

 

249,606

The reclassification amounting to R$ 10,551 is related to the account “investment property”.

 

(a)(c)      Depreciation

 

The Company revisesreviews the estimated useful lives of its property, plant and equipment annually. In 2009, the Company adjusted the estimated useful lives of its property, plant and equipment, which were accounted for prospectively from January 1, 2009. The annual depreciation rates were as follows:annually: buildings - 2%; equipment - 5%; transportation equipment - 10%, and furniture and fixtures - 6.7%. Land is not depreciated.

 

The average depreciation rate was 9.8% in 2012, 9.9% in 2011 and 10.1% in 2010.

(d)      Capitalization of interest and other financial charges

In 2012, the amount of capitalized interest proportional to the Company’s interests held in jointly controlled entities totaled R$13,655.

Property, plant and equipment

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

2%

 

2%

 

2%

Equipment

 

5%

 

5%

 

5%

Transportation equipment

 

10%

 

10%

 

10%

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

6.7%

 

6.7%

 

6.7%

F-59

F-53


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

12 

13        Loans and Financing

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

Denominated in local currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Government/Banco do Brasil

348,695

 

479,548

 

828,243

 

316,541

 

818,359

 

1,134,900

8th issue debentures

-

 

-

 

-

 

465,086

 

-

 

465,086

9th issue debentures

-

 

-

 

-

 

33,333

 

198,242

 

231,575

10th issue debentures

2,008

 

283,293

 

285,301

 

-

 

279,497

 

279,497

11th issue debentures

202,500

 

1,005,748

 

1,208,248

 

-

 

1,205,451

 

1,205,451

12th issue debentures

-

 

499,613

 

499,613

 

-

 

499,715

 

499,715

13th issue debentures

599,411

 

-

 

599,411

 

-

 

-

 

-

14th issue debentures

-

 

279,810

 

279,810

 

-

 

-

 

-

1st issue debentures – Aquapolo

-

 

160,099

 

160,099

 

-

 

-

 

-

Caixa Econômica Federal

110,646

 

917,574

 

1,028,220

 

91,031

 

783,426

 

874,457

Promissory notes

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

599,755

 

599,755

FIDC - SABESP I

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,889

 

-

 

13,889

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES)

37,554

 

3,491

 

41,045

 

43,403

 

40,518

 

83,921

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) Baixada Santista

16,309

 

114,165

 

130,474

 

-

 

130,474

 

130,474

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) PAC

6,428

 

67,489

 

73,917

 

1,649

 

44,352

 

46,001

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) Onda Limpa

14,270

 

235,383

 

249,653

 

-

 

246,986

 

246,986

Foz do Brasil – Mutual

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

52,896

 

52,896

Santander

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,427

 

-

 

2,427

Financial leasing

-

 

49,609

 

49,609

 

-

 

-

 

-

Other

1,784

 

3,503

 

5,287

 

2,816

 

3,850

 

6,666

Interest and others charges

101,028

 

2,916

 

103,944

 

141,991

 

-

 

141,991

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total denominated in local currency

1,440,633

 

4,102,241

 

5,542,874

 

1,112,166

 

4,903,521

 

6,015,687

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominated in foreign currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) US$386,862,000 (2010 - US$ 344,898,000)

71,591

 

652,141

 

723,732

 

63,185

 

511,484

 

574,669

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) US$10,316,000

-

 

18,928

 

18,928

 

-

 

-

 

-

Eurobonds - US$ 140,000,000 (2010 - US$ 140,000,000)

-

 

262,067

 

262,067

 

-

 

232,612

 

232,612

Eurobonds - US$ 350,000,000 (2010 – US$ 350,000,000)

-

 

649,024

 

649,024

 

-

 

576,107

 

576,107

JICA - ¥ 39,456,912,000 (2010 - ¥ 21,316,000,000)

53,204

 

905,529

 

958,733

 

11,810

 

425,168

 

436,978

IADB 1983AB - US$ 226,058,000 (2010 - US$ 250,000,000)

44,911

 

376,355

 

421,266

 

39,893

 

373,575

 

413,468

Interest and others charges

19,671

 

-

 

19,671

 

15,089

 

5

 

15,094

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total denominated in foreign currency

189,377

 

2,864,044

 

3,053,421

 

129,977

 

2,118,951

 

2,248,928

Total loans and financing

1,630,010

 

6,966,285

 

8,596,295

 

1,242,143

 

7,022,472

 

8,264,615

 

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Financial institution

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

LOCALCURRENCY 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banco do Brasil

380,631

100,306

480,937

348,695

479,548

828,243

10th issue debentures

36,459

252,166

288,625

2,008

283,293

285,301

11th issue debentures

472,500

535,949

1,008,449

202,500

1,005,748

1,208,248

12th issue debentures

-

499,511

499,511

-

499,613

499,613

13th issue debentures

-

-

-

599,411

-

599,411

14th issue debentures

-

284,649

284,649

-

279,810

279,810

15th issue debentures

-

791,451

791,451

-

-

-

16th issue debentures

-

499,457

499,457

-

-

-

1st issue debentures – Aquapolo

847

157,020

157,867

-

160,099

160,099

Brazilian Federal Savings Bank

117,217

931,004

1,048,221

110,646

917,574

1,028,220

Brazilian Development Bank – BNDES

4,154

-

4,154

37,554

3,491

41,045

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES BAIXADA SANTISTA

16,309

97,855

114,164

16,309

114,165

130,474

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES PAC

8,447

80,244

88,691

6,428

67,489

73,917

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES PAC II 9751

-

6,500

6,500

-

-

-

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES PAC II 9752

-

13,000

13,000

-

-

-

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES ONDA LIMPA

19,230

216,026

235,256

14,270

235,383

249,653

Loans  

-

215,774

215,774

-

49,609

49,609

Other

5,416

2,923

8,339

1,784

3,503

5,287

Interest and finance charges

108,514

-

108,514

101,028

2,916

103,944

TOTAL IN LOCAL CURRENCY

1,169,724

4,683,835

5,853,559

1,440,633

4,102,241

5,542,874

FOREIGN CURRENCY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank - BID US$417,295 thousand ( US$386,862 thousand in December 2011)

77,967

770,494

848,461

71,591

652,141

723,732

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development -IBRD –US$26,864 thousand (US$10,316 thousand in December 2011)

-

54,492

54,492

-

18,928

18,928

Eurobonds - US$140,000 thousand (US$140,000 thousand in December 2011)

-

285,655

285,655

-

262,067

262,067

Eurobonds - US$350,000 thousand (US$350,000 thousand in December 2011)

-

708,076

708,076

-

649,024

649,024

JICA 15–¥19,591,310 thousand (¥20,743,740 thousand in December 2011)

27,335

437,371

464,706

28,015

476,266

504,281

JICA 18 –¥17,614,720 thousand (¥18,650,880 thousand in December 2011)

24,578

392,894

417,472

25,189

427,843

453,032

JICA 17-¥324,213 thousand (¥62,292 thousand in December 2011)

-

7,524

7,524

-

1,420

1,420

JICA 19-¥5,407 thousand

-

1

1

-

-

-

BID 1983AB - US$202,115 thousand (US$226,058 thousand in December 2011)

48,926

361,587

410,513

44,911

376,355

421,266

Interest and finance charges

18,861

-

18,861

19,671

-

19,671

TOTAL IN FOREIGN CURRENCY

197,667

3,018,094

3,215,761

189,377

2,864,044

3,053,421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LOANS AND FINANCING

1,367,391

7,701,929

9,069,320

1,630,010

6,966,285

8,596,295

 

Quote as of December 31, 2012 US$2.0435; Yen 0.023720 (US$1.8758; Yen 0.024310 as of December 31, 2011)

During 2012 and 2011 the Company did not have short-term borrowings.

F-54



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

Currency

 

Guarantees

 

Maturity

 

Annual interest rates

 

Foreign exchange adjustment

Financial institution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Government/Banco do Brasil

Real

 

São Paulo State Government and Own funds

 

2014

 

UPR + 8.50%

 

 

10th issue debentures

Real

 

Own funds

 

2020

 

TJLP + 1.92% (1st & 3rd series) & IPCA + 9.53%

(2nd series)

 

 

11th issue debentures

Real

 

Own funds

 

2015

 

DI + 1.95% & DI + 1.4%

(2nd series)

 

 

12th issue debentures

Real

 

Own funds

 

2025

 

TR + 9.5%

 

 

13th issue debentures

Real

 

Own funds

 

2012

 

CDI + 0.65%

 

 

14th issue debentures

Real

 

Own funds

 

2022

 

TJLP + 1.92% and 9.19%

 

 

1st issue debentures - Aquapolo

Real

 

Own funds

 

2029

 

TR + 8.75%

 

 

Caixa Econômica Federal

Real

 

Own funds

 

2011/2032

 

UPR + 5% to 9.5%

 

 

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES)

Real

 

Own funds

 

2013

 

3% + TJLP 6% LIMIT

 

 

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) Coastal region

Real

 

Own funds

 

2019

 

2.5% + TJLP 6% LIMIT

 

 

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) PAC

Real

 

Own funds

 

2023

 

2.15% + TJLP 6% LIMIT

 

 

National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) ONDA LIMPA

Real

 

Own funds

 

2025

 

1.92% + TJLP 6% LIMIT

 

 

Foz do Brasil - Mutual

Real

 

-

 

2012

 

CDI + 1.75% + IOF

 

 

Santander

Real

 

-

 

2011

 

CDI

 

 

Other

Real

 

-

 

2011/2018

 

12%/CDI/TJLP + 6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) US$ 344,898,000 (2009 - US$ 374,647,000)

U.S. dollar

 

Federal Government

 

2016/2035

 

1.14% to 3.29%

 

Currency Basket Fluctuation + US$

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - BIRD

U.S. dollar

 

Federal Government

 

2034

 

0.43%

 

US$

Eurobonds - US$ 140,000,000 (2010 - US$ 140,000,000)

U.S. dollar

 

-

 

2016

 

7.50%

 

US$

Eurobonds - US$ 350,000,000

U.S. dollar

 

-

 

2020

 

6.30%

 

US$

JICA - ¥ 39,456,912,000 (2010 - ¥ 21,316,000,000)

Yen

 

Federal Government

 

2029

 

0.01 to 2.5%

 

Yen

IADB 1983AB - US$ 250,000,000 (2009 - US$ 250,000,000)

U.S. dollar

 

-

 

2023

 

2.49% to 2.99%

 

US$

 

GUARANTEES

MATURITY

ANNUAL INTEREST RATES

FOREIGN EXCHANGE ADJUSTMENT

LOCALCURRENCY 

 

 

 

 

Banco do Brasil

SÃO PAULO STATE GOVERNMENT AND OWN FUNDS

2014

8.50%

UPR

10th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2020

TJLP +1.92% (series 1 and 3) and 9.53% (series 2)

IPCA (series 2)

11th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2015

CDI + 1.95% (series 1) and CDI + 1.4% (series 2)

 

12th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2025

TR + 9.5%

 

13th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2012

CDI + 0.65%

 

14th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2022

TJLP +1.92% (series 1 and 3) and 9.19% (series 2)

IPCA (series 2)

15th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2019

CDI + 0.99% (series 1) and 6.2% (series 2)

IPCA (series 2)

16th issue debentures

OWN FUNDS

2015

CDI + 0.30% to 0.70%

 

1st issue debentures – Aquapolo

OWN FUNDS

2029

TR + 8.75%

 

Brazilian Federal Savings Bank

OWN FUNDS

2011/32

6.8% (weighted)

UPR

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES

OWN FUNDS

2013

3% + TJLP

 

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES BAIXADA SANTISTA

OWN FUNDS

2019

2.5% + TJLP

 

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES PAC

OWN FUNDS

2023

2.15% + TJLP

 

Brazilian Development Bank- BNDES PAC II 9751

OWN FUNDS

2027

1.72%+TJLP

 

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES PAC II 9752

OWN FUNDS

2027

1.72%+TJLP

 

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES ONDA LIMPA

OWN FUNDS

2025

1.92% + TJLP

 

Other 

OWN FUNDS

2011/2018/

2025

TJLP + 6% /

12%

UPR

 

 

 

 

 

FOREIGN CURRENCY

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Development Bank - BID US$417,295 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2017 to 2035

0.99% to 3.00%

US$

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - IBRD US$26,864 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2034

0.82%

US$

Eurobonds – US$140,000 thousand

2016

7.50%

US$

Eurobonds – US$350,000 thousand

2020

6.25%

US$

JICA 15 –¥19,591,310 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2029

1.8% and 2.5%

Yen

JICA 18–¥17,614,720 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2029

1.8% and 2.5%

Yen

JICA 17–¥324,213 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2035

1.2% and 0.01%

Yen

JICA 19–¥5,407 thousand

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

2037

1.7% and 0.01%

Yen

BID 1983AB – US$202,115 thousand

2023

2.49% to 2.99%

US$

F-55

   



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(i)        Payment schedule – book values

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019 to 2036

TOTAL

LOCAL CURRENCY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banco do Brasil

380,631

100,306

-

-

-

-

-

480,937

Debentures

509,806

359,430

987,885

222,478

224,461

380,952

844,997

3,530,009

Brazilian Federal Savings Bank

117,217

79,283

57,689

57,094

59,715

63,091

614,132

1,048,221

BNDES

4,154

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,154

BNDES BAIXADA SANTISTA

16,309

16,309

16,309

16,309

16,309

16,309

16,310

114,164

BNDES PAC

8,447

8,447

8,447

8,447

8,447

8,447

38,009

88,691

BNDES PAC II 9751

-

813

1,083

1,083

1,083

1,083

1,355

6,500

BNDES PAC II 9752

-

-

813

1,083

1,083

1,083

8,938

13,000

BNDES ONDA LIMPA

19,230

19,230

19,230

19,230

19,230

19,230

119,876

235,256

Leases

-

-

-

-

-

-

215,774

215,774

Other

5,416

497

560

631

711

524

-

8,339

Interest and charges

108,514

-

-

-

-

-

-

108,514

TOTAL IN LOCAL CURRENCY

1,169,724

584,315

1,092,016

326,355

331,039

490,719

1,859,391

5,853,559

FOREIGN CURRENCY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BID

77,967

77,967

77,967

77,967

88,109

36,822

411,662

848,461

IBRD

-

-

-

-

-

-

54,492

54,492

Eurobonds

-

-

-

285,655

-

-

708,076

993,731

JICA

51,913

51,913

51,913

51,913

52,121

52,329

577,601

889,703

BID 1983AB

48,926

48,926

48,926

48,926

48,926

48,496

117,387

410,513

Interest and finance charges

18,861

-

-

-

-

-

-

18,861

Foreign currency

197,667

178,806

178,806

464,461

189,156

137,647

1,869,218

3,215,761

Total

1,367,391

763,121

1,270,822

790,816

520,195

628,366

3,728,609

9,069,320

F-56

   

Exchange rate as of December 31, 2011: US$ 1.8758; Yen 0.024310 - (December 31, 2010 - US$ 1.6662; Yen 0.0205).



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(a)                   Banco do Brasil

 

In March 1994, the Company refinanced the existing loan agreements with Caixa Econômica Federal, which assigned loans rights represented by receivables tofrom the Federal Government, with Banco do Brasil acting as financial agent. Under the agreement entered into with the Federal Government, payments are made based on the Price amortization system, monthly indexed by the Standard ReferenceBenchmark Unit (UPR), which is equal to the Government's benchmark Interest Rateinterest rate (TR), plus interest of 8.5% per year. The interest and principal amount are monthly paid with final maturity in 2014. This financing is guaranteed by the State Government of São Paulo State Government by a pledge of its own revenues and revenues of the Company.Company revenues.

 

(b)      Debentures

 

(i)       8th issue

To terminate the program registered with the CVM on September 17, 2004, the Company issued on June 1, 2005, 700,000 debentures, using the option to increase the number of debentures allowed by up to 20%, distributed in two series, without renegotiation, with the face value of R$ 1 each, totaling R$ 700,000. The date for the financial settlement of the operation was June 24, 2005. Proceeds were used in the settlement of Eurobonds agreement.

The debentures were placed on the market as follows:

Number

Adjustment

Interest

Interest payment

Repayment

Maturity

Series 1

350,000

-

CDI+1.5% p.a.

Semiannual

Single installment

June 2009

Series 2

350,000

IGP-M

10.75% p.a.

Annual

Single installment

June 2011

Interest expense totaled R$ 18,520 and R$ 47,580 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to series 1 and R$ 22,742, R$ 49,863 and R$ 44,441 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to series 2.

Series 1 of the 810th issue of debentures was fully repaid on June 1, 2009.

On June 1, 2011 the 8th issue of debentures was fully repaid.

(ii)        9th issue

On October 23, 2008, the Company registered with the CVM a securities program for a total amount of R$ 3 billion and made a Public Offering of Simple Debentures, unsecured and non-convertible, of the 9th issue, in the context of the said program.

The debentures were placed on the market as follows:

Number

Adjustment

Interest

Interest payment

Repayment

Maturity

Series 1

100,000

-

CDI+2.75% p.a.

Semiannual

Annually (from October 15, 2011)

October 15, 2013

Series 2

100,000

IPCA

12.87% p.a.

Annual

Annually (from October 15, 2013)

October 15, 2015

Repayment will be made in three annual and consecutive installments of the same amount, the first of which falls due on October 15, 2011 for series 1 and October 15, 2013 for the series 2.

Settlement date of series 1 was on November 7, 2008 and of series 2 on November 10, 2008.

The funds arising from this issuance were used to refinance debts falling due.

F-63


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Interest expenses totaled R$ 11,896, R$ 12,354 and R$12,546 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to series 1 and R$ 16,486, R$ 16,993 and R$16,120, respectively, related to series 2.

On October 17, 2011 the 9th issue of debentures was fully repaid.

(iii)      10th issue

 

On November 15, 2009, the Company launched 100 debentures, subscribed exclusively by the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES). These debentures were distributed in three nonconvertible series, at a nominal value of R$ 2,753,2.753, totaling R$275,370. This transactionstransaction was settled on December 15, 2009, for all series.

The debentures were placed on the market as follows:

 

Number

 

Adjustment

 

Interest

 

Interest payment

 

RepaymentAmortization

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1

28

 

-

 

TJLP + 1.92% p.a.

 

Quarterly to November 2012 and monthly from then onthereafter

 

Monthly (from(starting in December 2012)

 

November 2020

Series 2

30

 

IPCA

 

9.53% p.a.

 

Annual

 

Annual (from(starting in December 2013)

 

December 2020

Series 3

42

 

-

 

TJLP + 1.92% p.a.

 

Quarterly to November 2012 and monthly from then onthereafter

 

Monthly (from(starting in December 2012)

 

November 2020

 

The funds raised inproceeds from this issuance will be used in expenditures in water supply and sewage systems in the following projects: Water TreatementTreatment Stations, atin Rio Grande, Litoral Norte, Vale do Paraíba and Mantiqueira, Bacia do Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiai;Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiaí; and for program ofin the loss reduction of losses.program.

 

In 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, interest expense related to 10th issueseries 1 totaled R$ 6,016,5,844, R$6,016 and R$755, respectively, related to series 1; R$ 8,862, R$ 9,156 and R$207, respectively,6,016, related to series 2 totaled R$9,273, R$8,862 and R$ 9,025, R$ 9,0259,156, and R$1,132, respectively, related to series 3.3 totaled R$8,767, R$9,025 and R$9,025, respectively.

The early amortization, fully or partially, of the subscribed debentures, when authorized by BNDES and/or BNDESPAR, shall always occur jointly, observing the proportionality between the outstanding balances of Series 1, 2 and 3 Debentures of all issues. The agreement does not include a premium due to early amortization.

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter, upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

F-57

   


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Financial covenantsStatements

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

.     EBITDA / - EBITDA/Net operating revenue: equal or higher than 38%.

.     EBITDA / - EBITDA/Financial expenses ratio:expenses: equal to or higher than 2.35.

.- Net debt / debt/EBITDA: equal to or lowerhigher than 3.65.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, the amount of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of its obligations provided for in the indenture deed shall imply the early maturity of this agreement.

 

(iv)       (ii)      11th issue of debentures

 

On March 1, 2010, the Company launched 1,215,000conducted the 11th issue of debentures. On April 30 and May 3, 2010 the Company settled series 1 and 2, respectively, through a public offering, asthe proceeds from which will be used to early redeem the 90 promissory notes issued on December 1, 2009, whose features are summarized below:

 

Number

 

Adjustment

 

Interest

 

Interest payment

 

RepaymentAmortization

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1

810,000

 

-

 

DI +DI+ 1.95% p.a.

 

Semiannual (September and March)

 

Annual (from March 2013)

 

March 2015

Series 2

405,000

 

-

 

DI + 1.40% p.a.

 

Semiannual (September and March)

 

Annual (from March 2012)

 

March 2013

 

The interest expense in 2012, 2011 and 2010 related to the 11th issueseries 1 was R$82,540, R$107,081 and R$80,077 related to series 1 and R$24,467, R$52,369 and R$38,103 related to series 2, in 2011respectively.

The Issuer, at its sole discretion, as of the 24th month, including, after the issue date, and 2010, respectively.at the end of each capitalization period, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth hereinbelow, by resolution at the Issuer’s Board of Directors’ meeting may early redeem series 1 Debentures, fully or partially. There will be no optional early redemption for Series 2 debentures. If the issuer elects the early redemption as of the 24th month, there will be a premium of 1.00% p.a. to the debenture holder, of 0.90% p.a. as of the 30th month and of 0.86% p.a. as of the 36th month.

 

(v)        Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

.     Adjusted current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities, excluding from current liabilities the current portion of noncurrent debts incurred by the Company that are recorded in current liabilities) higher than 1.0.

.     EBITDA to financial expenses ratio equal to or higher than 1.5.

F-58


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Noncompliance with these obligations will only be typified when verified in the quarterly financial statements for at least two consecutive quarters or two nonconsecutive quarters within a twelve-month period.

In case of noncompliance with the covenants, the trustee should call an extraordinary debenture holders' meeting within 48 hours from the acknowledgement of the noncompliance to resolve on the declaration of accelerated maturity of the debentures.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts,  in amount equal to or exceeding R$50 million adjusted by the IPCA variation as of the issue date, in view of contractual default, the amount of which may anyhow to compromise the settlement of the Company’s monetary obligations arising from the Issue, shall imply the early maturity of this agreement.

(iii)     12th issue of debentures

 

The CompanyIn June 2010, SABESP issued R$500 million in debentures to Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (FGTS). The debentures will be invested in program of structures to comply with the goal to universalize the sanitation service in the State of São Paulo, which were used until 2018.2011. Among the programs that will receive this investment are Vida Nova (water sources), Programa Metropolitano de Água (Water Metropolitan Program), Programa Metropolitano de Esgoto (Sewage Metropolitan Program), Programas de ÀguaÁgua e Esgotos do Interior e Litoral (Water and Sewage Program inside the state and coastal region).

F-64


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Initially, R$ 170 million was released and R$ 330 million is invested in a restricted bank account and will be released in 2 installments. The first installment will be released after 6 months and the second installment will be released after 12 months from the issuance date. The condition for releasing these installments is the execution of the investment in these projects by SABESP.

 

One of the conditions for approving this transaction is the allocation of 60% of the investments in poor areas.

 

The issuance of the debentures occurred on September 22, 2010 through a public offer under the Brazilian securities exchange commission rules, according to CVM Instruction nº 476, simple debentures, nonconvertible, are as follows:

 

 

Number

 

Adjustment

 

Interest

 

Interest payment

 

RepaymentAmortization

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unique SerieSinge series

500,000

 

-TR

 

TR + 9.5% p.a.

 

Monthly (from July 2010)

 

Monthly (from July 2014)

 

June 2025

 

The interest expense in 2012, 2011 and 2010 related to the 12th issuesingle series was R$46,849, R$51,434 and R$26,879, respectively.

The Issuer, at any time, may acquire outstanding debentures, in 2011observance to Article 55, Paragraph 2 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, by means of previous and 2010, respectively.express written consent of the debenture holders. The debentures acquired by the Issuer may be cancelled, held in the Issuer’s treasury, or again outstanding on the market. The debentures acquired by the Issuer to be held in treasury pursuant to this clause, if and when outstanding again on the market, will be entitled to same remuneration of other outstanding debentures.

F-59


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Reimbursement premiums to which debenture holders are entitled upon optional early redemption on the unit face value of debentures, plus remuneration and adjustment, if any, and will be calculated according to the following formula:

Premium (%) =P x DD , where

TDC 

P = 2% (two per cent); DD = number of running days, as of the date of the optional early redemption until the maturity date; and TDC = total number of running days as of the 1st to the fourth-eighth (48th) month as of the issue date to maturity date.

 

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter with the disclosure of the 11th and 12thissue of debentures:interim or annual financial statements:

 

.     Adjusted current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities, excluding from current liabilities the current portion of noncurrent debts incurred by the Company that are recorded in current liabilities) higher than 1.0.

 

.     EBITDA /to financial expenses ratio equal to or higher than 1.5.

 

.     Noncompliance with these obligations will only be typified when verified in the quarterly financial statements for at least two consecutive quarters or two nonconsecutive quarters within atwelve-month period.

 

In case of noncompliance with the covenants, the trustee should call an extraordinary debentureholers'debenture holders' meeting within 48 hours from the acknowledgement of the noncompliance to resolve on the declaration of accelerated maturity of the debentures.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e. the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, equal to or exceeding R$50 million, adjusted by IPCA variation as of the issue date, due to contractual default, the amount of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of the Company’s monetary obligations arising from the Issue, shall imply the early maturity of this agreement.

 

(vi)       13th issue

On January 11, 2011, the Company registered the(iv)     13th issue of simple debentures nonconvertible, in a unique series with public distribution and strict efforts according to Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM), instruction nº 476.

Number

Interest

Interest payment

Repayment

Maturity

Unique Serie

600,000

DI + 0.65% / 0.75% / 0.85% / 1.25% p.a.

Semi-annualy

Single installment

August 29, 2012

Issue date:         January 11, 2011

Series: Unique

Total amount: R$ 600,000

Quantity: 60

Unitary amount: R$ 10,000

Payment: semi-annually

Maturity date:  August 29, 2012


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

Repayment:       Partial or total, any time

Interest:              1st period: January 11, 2011 to February 26, 2011 = 0.65%

                                                2nd period: February 26, 2011 to August 30, 2011 = 0.75%

                                                3rd period: August 30, 2011 to March 1, 2012 = 0.85%

                                                4th period: March 1, 2012 to August 29, 2012 = 1.25%

 

The amount obtained inOn February 17, 2012, the Company fully redeemed the 13th issue of debentures, was utilized to repayin the 60 promissory notes with maturity date on February 26, 2011. On January 11, 2011 the promissory notes were fully repaid.amount of R$633,343.

Financial covenants

.     EBITDA / Financial expenses ratio: equal to or higher than 1.5.

.     Total debt / EBITDA: equal to or lower than 3.65.

 

(vii)     (v)      14th issue of debentures

 

On February 15, 2011, the Company launchedissued 100 debentures subscribed exclusivelythrough exclusive subscription by the NationalBrazilian Development Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES).– BNDES. These debentures were distributed ininto three nonconvertible series, at a nominalnot convertible into shares, by the face value of R$2,753.70, totaling R$275,370. This transaction was settledThe repayment of operation occurred on April 15, 2011, for all series.

 

The debentures were placed on the market as follows:

 

Number

 

Adjustment

 

Interest

 

Interest payment

 

RepaymentAmortization

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1

28

 

-

 

TJLP + 1.92% p.a.

 

Quarterly up to February 2014 and monthly from then onas of this date

 

Monthly (from March 2014)

 

February 2022

Series 2

30

 

IPCA

 

9.19% p.a.

 

Annual

 

Annual (from March 2015)

 

March 2022

Series 3

42

 

-

 

TJLP + 1.92% p.a.

 

Quarterly up to February 2014 and monthly from then onas of this date

 

Monthly (from March 2014)

 

February 2022

 

F-60


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The funds raised inproceeds obtained with this issuance will be used in expendituresissue are allocated to the Company’s investments in water supply and sewage treatment systems in the following projects: Water Treatement Stations atETA Rio Grande, Litoral Norte, Vale doNorth Coast, Paraíba Valley and Mantiqueira, Bacia do Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiai;Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiaí and for program of reduction of losses.the Loss Reduction Program.

 

InInterest expenses in 2012 and 2011 interest expense relatedreferring to the series 1 wasamounted to R$5,848 and R$5,254, related toR$8,371 and R$6,916 for series 2, was R$ 6,916 and R$8,772 and R$7,881 related tofor series 3.3, respectively.

 

Financial covenantsThe early amortization, fully or partially of the subscribed debentures, when authorized by BNDES and/or BNDESPAR, shall always occur jointly, observing the proportionality between the outstanding balance of Series 1, 2 and 3 Debentures of all issues. The agreement does not include premium due to early amortization.

 

.     EBITDA / Net revenue:Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

- EBITDA/net operating revenue equal to or higher than 38%.

 

.     EBITDA / Financial- EBITDA/financial expenses ratio: equal to or higher than 2.35.

 

.- Net debt / EBITDA:bank debt/EBITDA equal to or lower than 3.65.

 

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, the amount of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of its obligations provided for in the indenture deed, shall imply the early maturity of this agreement.

(viii)   1(vi)     15stth issue - Aquapoloof Debentures

 

In August 2011,On February 15, 2012, the joint-controlled entity “Aquapolo” launched 326,732 debentures,Company issued the 115stth issue of simple77,108 non-convertible unsecured debentures, nonconvertible,in two series, for public offering, with restricted placement efforts, pursuant to CVM Instruction nº 476, totaling R$771,080 and unit value R$10, with the following characteristics:

 

Number

 

Adjustment

 

Interest

 

Interest payment

 

Amortization

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1

28,733

 

-

 

DI+ 0.99% p.a.

 

Semiannual

(February and August)

 

Annual (from February 2015)

 

February 2017

Series 2

48,375

 

IPCA

 

6.20%

 

Annual (February)

 

Annual (from February 2018)

 

February 2019

F-61


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The proceeds deriving from the 15th Issue of Debentures were set aside to the settlement of financial commitments falling due until December 31, 2012.

Interest expenses referring to series 1 and 2 totaled R$22,336 and R$27,060, respectively, in 2012.

The total optional early redemption of series 1 debentures may occur as of the twenty-fourth (24th) month as of the issue date, inclusive and semi-annually, on the first business day after the end of each capitalization period of series 1 debentures, until the maturity date of series 1. There will be no optional early redemption of series 2 Debentures.

Premium of thirty hundredths per cent (0.30%) incurred on the balance of the face value of series 1 debentures, as follows:

Premium =P x (DU) x PU, where,

252 

P= 0.30%; DU= number of business days as of the redemption date to the maturity date of the debenture; and PU= unit face value of series 1 debentures, calculatedpor rata temporis as of the last payment date of series 1 remuneration or as of the issue date, whichever occurs last, until the date of early redemption.

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

- Adjusted Total Debt/ EBITDA: lower than or equal to 3.65; and

- EBITDA /Paid Financial Expenses: equal to or higher than 1.5.

Non-fulfillment of the covenant clauses shall trigger the early maturity of the contract.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, equal to or exceeding R$90 million, shall imply the early maturity of this agreement, adjusted by IPCA variation as of the issue date, due to contractual default, the amount of which may compromise the settlement of the Company’s monetary obligations arising from the Issue.

(vii)   16th issue of Debentures

On November 12, 2012, the Company issued the 16th issue of 50,000 non-convertible, unsecured debentures, in a unique series.single series, for public offering, with restricted placement efforts, pursuant to CVM Instruction nº 476, totaling R$500,000 and unitary value of R$10, with the following characteristics:

F-62


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

Number

 

InterestAdjustment

 

PaymentInterest

 

AmortizationInterest payment

 

Amortization

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unique serieSingle series

50,000

-

DI+ 0.30% to 0.70% p.a.

Semiannual (May and November)

Lump sum (in November 2015)

November 2015

The proceeds deriving from the 16th Issue of Debentures will be exclusively set aside to the settlement of the Issuer’s financial commitments in 2012/2013.

Interest expenses corresponding to the single series totaled R$4,504 in 2012.

The optional early redemption of debentures may occur at any time in relation to the total outstanding debentures, from the availability of funds raised with the Issue (“Total Early Redemption”), without any addition as redemption premium.

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

- Adjusted Total Debt/EBITDAlower than or equal to 3.65; and

- EBITDA/Paid Financial Expenses equal to or higher than 1.5.

The failure to comply with the indicators by the Issuer, will result in the early maturity of the contract, when it is verified, for at least two consecutive quarters, or even for two non-consecutive quarters within a twelve-month period.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, in the individual or aggregate amount equal to or exceeding R$90 million due to contractual default, the occurrence of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of the Company’s monetary obligations arising from the Issue, shall imply the early maturity.

(viii) 1st issue of Debentures - Aquapolo

In August 2011, jointly-owned subsidiary Aquapolo held the 1st issue of 326,732 book-entry, registered non-convertible debentures, totaling R$326,732, in a single series at the unit value of R$1, whose characteristics are:

Number

Adjustment

Interest

Interest payment

Amortization

Maturity

Single series

326,732

-

 

TR + 8.75% p.a.

 

Monthly (from December 2013)

 

Monthly (from December 2013)

 

Agosto/August 2029

F-66

F-63


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The proceeds deriving from the 1st issue of debentures will be fully set aside to the works of the Aquapolo project.

Financial covenants

– Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

- Debt service coverage ratio (cash generation/debt service) exceeding 1.2;

- Adjusted current liquidity ratio higher than 1.0; and

- Do not contract a single operation or series of operations, any medium and long-term operations, in amount exceeding R$20 million.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the issuer’s debts, in the individual or aggregate amount equal to or exceeding R$5 million, shall imply the early maturity of the agreement.

 

(c)      Caixa Econômica Federal - Pro-sanitation Program

 

(i)       Water and sewage

 

Several loan agreements were entered into from 1996 to 2004 under the Pro-Sanitation Program for expanding and improving the water supply and sewage systems of several municipalities of the State of São Paulo and of the City of São Paulo. Loans are collateralized by the collections of the daily billings of water supply and sewage services up to the total amount of the debt.

 

Contractually established repayment terms range from 120 to 180 months, after the beginning of the repayment period.

 

The balance of these facilities as of December 31, 20112012 was R$487,663 (R$563,750 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 607,638)in December 2011).

 

The contractual charges are:

 

Contract signed in:

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998 to 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate

 

9.5% p.a.

 

6.5% to 8.0% p.a.

 

6.5% to 8.0% p.a.

During grace period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk rate

 

1.0% p.a. on amount raised

 

1.0% p.a. on amount raised

 

0.6% p.a. or 2% p.a. on outstanding balance

Management fee

 

0.12% p.m. on the contract amount

 

2.0% p.a. on amount raised

 

1.0% p.a. on amount raised or 2% p.a. on outstanding balance for contracts entered into between 2003 and 2004

During repayment period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management fee

 

Difference between installment calculation and a 10.5% p.a. rate less the 9.5% p.a.

 

1.0% p.a. on the outstanding balance

 

1.0% p.a. on the outstanding balance

Contract signed in

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998 to 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate

 

9.5% p.a.

 

6.5% to 8.0% p.a.

 

6.5% to 8.0% p.a.

 

 

 

 

 

 

During grace period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk rate

 

1.0% p.a. on amount disbursed

 

1.0% p.a. on amount disbursed

 

0.6% p.a. or 2% p.a. on outstanding debt balance

 

Management fee

 

0.12% p.m. on the contract amount

 

2.0% p.a. on amount disbursed

 

1.0% p.a. on amount disbursed or 2% p.a. on debt balance for contracts entered into in 2003 and 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During repayment period

:

 

 

 

 

 

Management fee

 

Difference between installment calculation and a 10.5% p.a. rate less the 9.5% p.a. rate

 

1.0% on the debt balance

 

1.0% on the debt balance

F-64


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(ii)     Pró-Sanear Program

 

In 1997, 1998 and 2008, contracts were signed under the Pró-Sanear Program for the improvement of water and sewage services, with the involvement of the communities receiving the services, in several municipalities of the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. The credit facilities are collateralized by the collections of the daily billings of water supply and sewage services up to the total amount of the debt. Repayment will be made in 180 months after the beginning of the repayment period. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the balance was R$11,847 (R$14,448 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 16,752)in December 2011).

 

The financial charges are:

 

.     interest rate - 5.0% p.a.;

.     management fee (grace period) - 2.0% p.a. on debt outstanding balance;

.     management fee (repayment phase) - 1.0% p.a. on debt outstanding balance;

.     risk rate (grace period) - 1.0% p.a. on amounts disbursed.raised.

 

(iii)   Growth Acceleration Program (PAC)

 

In 2007, 2008 and 2008,2012, the Company entered into agreements linked to the Universal Water and Sewage Services were entered with several municipalities, with funds from the Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (FGTS). The credits facilities are guaranteed by a monthly flow of the billings corresponding to the minimum of three times the monthly charge. Repayments will be made in 240 months after the beginning of the repayment period. The balance as of December 31, 20112012 was R$536,113 (R$440,733 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 250,067)in December 2011).

F-67


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

The financial charges are:

 

.     interest rate -– 5% p.a. to 6% p.a.;

.     management fee - 1.05%– 1.00% p.a. to 1.40% p.a. during the period of the contract;

.     risk rate - 0.3% p.a. on the adjusted debt balances.

Covenantsbalance.

 

An(iv)     Financial covenants –Calculated every quarter with the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

The agreement is subject to AMD – Agreement for Performance Improvement sets targets for financial indicators (billing losses, revenue evasion, cash and cash equivalents and reduction of the number of days of committed receivables), and operating indicators that,based on the past two years, are annually projected for the following five years.

F-65


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debts, due to contractual default, the occurrence of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of its monetary obligations deriving from the Issue shall imply the early maturity.

 

Noncompliance with 4(d)      Caixa Econômica Federal - SESAMM

In September 2010, a loan and onlending agreement was signed between Caixa Econômica Federal and the shared controlled investee SESAMM – Serviços de Saneamento de Mogi Mirim SA, destined to investments in sewage systems in the urban area of the 8 covenant clauses will acceleratemunicipality of Mogi Mirim, within the maturityscope of the contract.sanitation program for all citizens. According to the terms of the agreement signed with the Federal Government, payments are made by the Price System and monthly indexed by the variation of the Reference Standard Unit – UPR corresponding to the Benchmark Interest Rate – TR issued by the Government, plus annual interest of 6.0%, management fee of 2% p.a. and credit risk of 0.3% p.a. Interest rates and principal are monthly paid with final maturity in 2031.

 

(d)Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

- Subscribed and paid-in capital stock, corresponding to, at least, twenty per cent (20%) of the total amount of investments in funds from this financing

- Debt service coverage ratio (ICSD) of, at least, 1.3 during the amortization phase;

- Indebtedness limit of up to one twelfth (1/12) of its annual gross revenue or up to the amount corresponding to three (3) monthly installments, referring to the agreements in force, whichever is the highest.

(e)  BNDES

 

Contract 01.2.619.3.1 - Entered into in August 2002, totaling up to R$60,000, for the purpose of financing part of the Company's contribution to the Tietê River Pollution Abatement Project - Stage II, related to loan agreement 1212/OC - BR with the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). The related project is in progress and thecontract was settled on August 15, 2012. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2011 was R$ 11,638 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 20,980).11,638.

 

The related projectContract 10/669.748-6, amounting to R$180,000, is in performance of works stage and the debt balance as of December 31, 20112012 was R$4,154 (R$29,407 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 62,941)in December 2011). The funds are onlent from BNDES to the agents and from the latter to SABESP. The onlending agreement has the same purpose as the agreement between BNDES and SABESP, and the same interest and repayment terms, as follows:

 

Interest - TJLP limited to 6% p.a., plus a 3% p.a. spread, paid quarterly during the grace period, and monthly in the repayment period. The TJLP portion exceeding 6% p.a. will be added to the debt outstanding balance.

 

RepaymentF-66


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of borrowings was initiated in September 2005, with monthly payments, and conclusion scheduled for February 2013.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Loans are collateralized by part of revenues from the provision of water and sewage services.

 

CovenantsFinancial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

 

.     Adjusted current ratio: higher than 1.0.

.     Ebitda/NetEBITDA /Net Operating Revenue: equal to or higher than 38%.

.     Total connections (water and sewage)/own employees: equal to or higher than 520.

.     EBITDA/Debt Service cost: equal to or higher than 1.5.

.     Equity /to Total Liabilities: equal to or higher than 0.8.

Noncompliance with covenants will accelerate the maturity of the contract.

The Company obtained from BNDES the suspension for 13 months of the compliance of covenants as from December 2011.

 

(e)(f)  BNDES Baixada Santista (Onda limpa I)

 

Contract 07.2.0800.1 - In November 2007, the Company entered into a financing agreement with BNDES for the Environmental Recovery Program of the Santos Metropolitan Region, totaling R$129,973 with interest of 2.5% p.a. plus TJLP limited to 6%.TJLP.

 

Repayment will be made in 96 monthly, consecutive installments, starting January 2012 to December 2019.

F-68

The agreement is in progress and the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2012 was R$114,164 (2011 R$130,474).

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

.     Adjusted EBITDA /Adjusted Net Operating Revenue: equal to or higher than 38%.

.     Adjusted EBITDA /Adjusted Financial Expenses: equal to or higher than 2.35.

.     Adjusted Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA: equal to or higher than 3.65;

The agreement is subject to AMD – Performance Improvement Agreement which establishes targets for financial ratios (sales losses, revenue evasion, cash and cash equivalents and reduction of accounts receivable commitment days) and operational ratios which, based on the last two years, are yearly projected for the next five years.

In the event the levels set out in the Financial Commitments are not met, the Company within ninety (90) days as of the date of BNDES’ written notice shall create a reinforced guarantee, preferably revenue commitment and assignment, deemed as satisfactory, at BNDES’ discretion, unless if within such term the levels set out in the financial commitments are recovered, under the power that BNDES may suspend the release of funds and where applicable, declare the agreement’s early maturity.

(g) BNDES Onda Limpa II

Contract 09.2.1535.1 – In March 2010, a loan agreement was signed with BNDES to theEnvironmental Recovery Program of the metropolitan region of Santos coast, in the amount of R$294,349 and interest rates of 1.92% p.a. plus TJLP.

F-67


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

A portion of the Company's revenueThe amortization is pledged as guarantee for this financing.estimated in 156 monthly and successive installments, from April 2012 to March 2025.

 

The agreementcontract is in progressperformance of working stage and the debt balance as of December 31, 2011 and 20102012 was R$ 130,474 and R$ 130,474.235,256 (R$249,653 in 2011).

 

(f)          Receivables Investment Funds (FIDCFinancial covenantsSABESP I)Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

.     Adjusted EBITDA / Adjusted Net Operating Revenue: equal to or higher than 38%.

.     Adjusted EBITDA /Adjusted Financial Expenses: equal to or higher than 2.35.

.     Adjusted Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA: equal to or lower than 3.65.

The agreement is subject to AMD – Performance Improvement Agreement which establishes targets for financial ratios (sales losses, revenue evasion, cash and cash equivalents and reduction of accounts receivable commitment days) and operational ratios which, based on the last two years, are yearly projected for the next five years.

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any of the Company’s debt, due to contractual default the amount of which may anyhow compromise the settlement of its obligations deriving from this agreement, shall imply the early maturity of this agreement.

(h) BNDES PAC I and II

 

On March 23, 2006,(i)Contract 08.2.0169.1 – In November 2007, a single seriesloan agreement was signed with BNDES to the Environmental Recovery Program of senior shares and 26 subordinated shares, held in a deposit accountthe metropolitan region of Santos coast, in the nameamount of its holders, were issued with unit value on issue date corresponding to R$ 500. The senior shares are being repaid in 54 monthly installments, starting October 2006,174,517 and their final maturity is in March 2011.  In March 2011 the FIDC was totally repaid.interest rates of 2.15% p.a. plus TJLP.

 

The Fund is managed by Caixa Econômica Federalamortization will occur in 150 monthly and its custodian and recording agent is Banco do Brasil S.A.successive installments, from January 2011 to December 2023.

 

The funds raised,contract is in performance of working stage and the debt balance as of December 31, 2012 was R$88,691 (R$73,917 in 2011).

(ii)Contract 11.2.0975.1 – On March 5, 2012, a loan agreement was signed with BNDES to the program to expand and optimize the sewage systems in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, as well as to design the executive project of the São Lourenço production system, totaling R$ 250 million, were used by135,850 and interest of 1.72% p.a. plus TJLP.

The amortization will occur in 156 monthly and successive installments, from April 2014 to March 2027.

The contract is in performance of working stage and the debt balance as of December 31,2012 was R$6,500.

F-68


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(iii)Contract 11.2.0975.2 – On March 5, 2012, a loan agreement was signed with BNDES to the program to expand and optimize the sewage systems of the metropolitan region of São Paulo, as well as to design the executive project of the São Lourenço production system, totaling R$44,948 with interest rates of 1.72% p.a. plus TJLP.

The amortization will occur in 144 monthly and successive installments, from April 2015 to March 2027.

The contract is in performance of working stage and the debt balance as of December 31, 2012 was R$13,000.

(iv)Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

.     Adjusted EBITDA /Adjusted Net Operating Revenue: equal to or higher than 38%.

.     Adjusted EBITDA /Adjusted Financial Expense: equal to or higher than 2.35.

.     Adjusted Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA: equal to or lower than 3.65.

The agreement is subject to AMD – Performance Improvement Agreement which establishes targets for financial ratios (sales losses, revenue evasion, cash and cash equivalents and reduction of accounts receivable commitment days) and operational ratios which, based on the last two years, are yearly projected for the next five years

In the event the levels set out in the Financial Commitments are not met, the Company to settle debtswithin ninety (90) days as of the date of BNDES’ written notice shall create a reinforced guarantee, preferably revenue commitment and assignment, deemed as satisfactory, at BNDES’ discretion, unless if within that term the levels set out in 2006.the financial commitments are recovered, under the power that BNDES may suspend the release of funds and where applicable, declare the agreement’s early maturity.

 

(g)         Financial leasing(i)       Leases

 

The Company has lease agreements signed contracts of assets rental with some suppliers which consist in constructing an infrastructure by the supplier and rent this construction to SABESP. After finishing the contract the infrastructure will be transferred to SABESP.as Assets Lease. During the construction phase, the Company recognizes anperiod, works are capitalized to intangible assets and the related liability at fair value. The conclusion of the construction is estimated to June 2013.

When the construction is completed, the Company starts to pay the rental (192 installments)in progress and the lease amount is updated accordinglyrecorded at the same proportion. Works are estimated to the contract.be concluded in 2013 and 2014.

 

OnAfter startup, the lease payment period starts (240 monthly installments), whose amount is periodically restated by contracted price index.

No work related to these contracts was in operation on December 31, 2011, there were no constructions completed.2012.

 

(h)(j)  Eurobonds

 

(i)On November 3, 2006, the Company issued Eurobonds abroad (Eurobonds 2016) totaling US$140 million. The issue was led by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americasand the principal agent was Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. The interest rate is 7.5% p.a., paid semiannually, and maturity is in November 2016. As mentioned in item (i) above, theThe funds raised were used for the early repayment and partial issue of US$225 million in the Eurobonds, with final maturity in June 2008, and the amount redeemed was US$126,948 thousand.

F-69


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

As of December 31, 2012 the balance of the Eurobonds was US$140,000 thousand, corresponding to R$285,655, net of issuance costs amounting to R$434, that will be amortized during the period of the contract.

Total redemption at the Company’s option in view of changes in the withholding income tax laws. Without any addition as redemption premium.

(ii)On December 9, 2010, the Company concluded the international offer to international qualified foreign institutions of its US$350 million senior unsecured notes due 2020, with interest rate is 6.25% p.a., paid semi-annually and due on December 2020 (the Eurobonds 2020).  The funds were used for partial repayment of outstanding debts.

 

As of December 31, 20112012 the balance of the Eurobonds was R$ 262,067US$350,000 thousand equivalent to US$ 140,000 thousand (December 31, 2010 was R$ 232,612),708,076, net of costissuance costs amounting to issue of R$ 546, which7,149, that will be amortized untilduring the maturity date.period of the contract.

 

Covenants - forOn December 16, 2015 and subsequently, the Company in one or in several occasions may redeem the Eurobonds, 2016.according to its full or partial option. This option shall incur the payment of 103.125% premium as of December 16, 2015 of 102.083%; as of December 16, 2016, 101.042%, as of December 16, 2017 and as of December 16, 2018, 100.000%. In the event of full redemption at the Company’s option due to changes in the withholding income tax, no addition will occur as redemption premium.

 

Limit(iii)Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

Restrict the funding of new debtdebts so that:

 

.     adjusted total debt to EBITDA does not exceed 3.65;

.     the Company's debt service coverage ratio, determined on the date this debt was incurred, shall not be lower than 2.35.

 

On December 9, 2010, the Company issued a US$ 350 million senior unsecured notes due 2020 (the Eurobonds 2020). The interest rate is 6.25% p.a., paid semi-annually and maturity date in December 2020. The funds were used for partial repayment of outstanding debts of the Company.

F-69


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

As of December 31, 2011 the balance of the Eurobonds was US$ 350,000 thousand, equivalent to R$ 649,024 (December 31, 2010 was R$ 576,107), net of cost to issue of R$ 7,507, which will be amortized during the period of the contract.

Noncompliance with covenants will accelerate the maturity of the contract.

 

The agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., the early maturity of any indebtedness in view of the Company’s loans or any of its Subsidiaries with a total principal amount of US$ 25.0 million or more (or its corresponding amount in other currencies) shall imply this agreement’s early maturity.

(i)(k)      Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)

 

Loan Agreement 713- In December 1992, the Company entered into a loan agreement withthe IADB for US$400 million to finance the first stage of the Tietê River Pollution Abatement Project. The repayment period started in June 1999 in semiannual installments, subject to annual floating rate interest, varying according to the loans raised by the Bank in each six-month period, and final maturity in December 2017. In December 1992, the Federal Republic of Brazil signed a guarantee contract with the IADB guaranteeing the funds for the fulfillment of the contractual obligations. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 20112012 was US$ 150,658125,488 thousand, equivalent to R$256,435 (R$282,605 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 290,019)in December 2011).

F-70


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Loan Agreement 896- In December 1992, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the IADB for US$50 million to finance the first stage of the Tietê River Pollution Abatement Project. Semiannual repayments started in June 1999, with annual interest of 3% and final maturity in December 2016. In December 1992, the Federal Republic of Brazil signed a guarantee contract with the IADB guaranteeing the funds for the fulfillment of the contractual obligations. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 20112012 was US$ 13,88911,111 thousand, equivalent to R$22,705 (R$26,053 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 27,770)in December 2011).

 

Loan Agreement 1,2121212 - In July 2000, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the IADB for US$200 million to finance the second stage of the Tietê River Pollution Abatement Project. In 2008, total disbursement for this agreement was US$ 2,434 thousand and there are nothe amounts to be disbursed.raised in this contract were summed up. The loan is being amortized semiannually and final maturity in July 2025. Interest is being paid on a semiannual basis, based on daily balances, at an annual variable rate according to the costs of loans of the Bank in the preceding six-month period, plus a spread, and changes every six months. The debt balance as of December 31, 20112012 was US$ 143,893133,615 thousand, equivalent to R$273,043 (R$269,915 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 256,880)in December 2011).

 

Loan Agreement 2,202/2202/OC-BR– On September 3, 2010 the Company and the Inter-American Development Bank (Banco InteramericanoInter-Americano de Desenvolvimento or BID) signed the contract for partially finance the third stage of the Tietê River Project, denominated the decontamination of the Tietê river. The total estimated cost of this investment is US$800 million, of which US$600 million will be financed by the BIDIADB and US$200 million will be invested by the Company´s  own resources. The final maturity of the loan is in 25 years and the repayment period commences in September 2016.The interestwith 6-year grace period. Interest is based on USD-Libor.USD-Libor, calculated every quarter, as stipulated in the IADB rules and procedures.

                          

OnThe 1st funding of the agreement executed on September 3, 2010, no. 2202/OC-BR occurred on March 17, 2011,2011. Funds are used to recover the Company received US$1,829 thousand, corresponding to R$ 3,044. This amount will be utilizedwater quality of Tietê River basin in the recovery of the Tiete river basin, located in the metropolitan regionMetropolitan Region of São Paulo. The agreement amounts to US$600,000, corresponding to R$1,036,380, on the contracting date, with final maturity date isin September 2035. The 1st funding of US$1,829, corresponding to R$3,044, occurred in the first quarter of 2011.

 

OnThe balance of this agreement as of December 31, 2011, the total amount of this contract2012 was US$ 78,422147,080 thousand, corresponding to R$296,276 (R$145,159 netin December 2011), less part of cost to issuefunding costs amounting to R$ 1,944,4,282, which will be amortized duringrepaid over the period of the contract.agreement term.

 

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

F-71


CovenantsCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

.     Loan agreements 713, 896 and 1,2121212 - Tariffs must: (a) produce revenues sufficient to cover the system's operating expenses, including administrative, operating, maintenance, and depreciation expenses; (b) provide a return on property, plant, and equipment no less than 7%; and (c) during project execution, the balances of short-term loans must not exceed 8.5% of total equity.

 

Noncompliance with covenants will accelerate the maturity of the contract.

F-70


 

Companhia de Saneamento BásicoThe agreement has a cross default clause among IADB agreements (same financial bank), i.e., the early maturity will occur in the event of failure to comply with any obligation therewith or any other agreement signed with IADB related to project finance.

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

(j)(l)  Japan Bank for International Cooperation Agency –- JICA ("JBIC")

 

On August 6, 2004, the Company entered into a financing agreement with the JBIC - Japan Bank for International Cooperation, actualcurrently JICA amounting to- Japan International Cooperation Agency, no. BZ-P 15, guaranteed by the Federal Government, totaling ¥21,320 million, equivalent to approximately R$ 337,687,587,643 on the agreement signature date, for the Environmental Recovery Program of the SantosBaixada Santista Metropolitan Region. Total financing period is 25 years, with a seven-year grace period and 18 years of repayment in semi-annual installments. Interest is being paid on a semiannual basis since 2006, and is 2.5% p.a. for the sewage network and 1.8% p.a. for sewage treatment facilities.

 

On November 1, 2010 the Company signed with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) an additional loan agreement referring to theOnda Limpa Program– 1st Phase, nº BZ-P 17 in the amount of six billion, two hundred and eight million Japanese Yen (JPY 6,208,000,000) corresponding to R$127,326 on November 30, 2011. Resources will be applied to acquire eligible goods and services require to implementing the suppliers project, contractors or consultants. The total loan term is 25 years, 7-year grace period and 18 years of amortization, in half-yearly installments. Interest rates are paid half-yearly as of 2011, 1.2% p.a. for sewage network and 0.01% p.a. for sewage treatment facilities.

On February 15, 2011, the Company signed a complementary agreement withand JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency), former JBIC, for the Environmental Recovery signed a supplementary loan agreement related toOnda LimpaProgram of the Santos Metropolitan Region– 1st phase, no. BZ-P 18, amounting to ¥ 19,169nineteen billion, one hundred, sixty-nine million equivalentYen (¥ 19,169,000) corresponding to R$375,904 as ofon March 31, 2011. Funds will be applied to execute works and services in the Program ofBaixada Santista Metropolitan Region. The agreement lastloan total term is 25 years, 7-year grace period and 18 years of amortization, in half-yearly installments. Interest rates are paid half-yearly as of 2011, 1.8% p.a. for sewage network and 2.5% p.a. for sewage treatment facilities.

In February 2012, the interest rate vary from 1.8%Company signed a loan agreement for the 2nd phase of the Water Losses Reduction Corporate Program nº BZ -P 19, in the amount of thirty-three billion, five hundred, eighty-four million Japanese Yen (JPY 33,584,000,000) corresponding to 2.5% per annum.R$709,294 on the agreement’s signature date. The loan total term is 25 years, 7-year grace period and 18 years of amortization, in half-yearly installments. Interest rates are paid half-yearly as of 2013, 1.7% p.a. for sewage network and 0.01% p.a. for sewage treatmentfacilities.

F-72


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The balance of thisthese loan agreementagreements as of December 31, 2011 was2012 were R$889,703 (R$958,733 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 436,978)in December 2011).

 

(k)(m)    AB Loan (IADB 1983AB)

 

On May 27, 2008, the Company entered into a loan agreement AB loan with IADB, totaling US$ 250.0250 million, the funding of which was fully disbursed in June 2008. The funds obtained were used to settle Eurobonds 2008 and to partlypartially perform the Company's investment plan.

 

The characteristics of this loan agreement are as follows:

 

US$

 

Repayment from

 

Maturity

 

Interest

(LIBOR (Libor + spread)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1983 A

100.0 million

 

May 2011

 

May 2023

 

Libor + 2.99%

1983 B1

100.0 million

 

May 2011

 

May 2020

 

Libor + 2.69%

1983 B2

50.0 million

 

May 2011

 

May 2018

 

Libor + 2.49%

 

 

Interest is being paid on a semiannual basis since November 2008. The balance of this loan agreement as of December 31, 20112012 was US$ 226.0202,115 million, equivalent to R$410,513 (R$421,266 (2010 - R$ 413,468)in December 2011), netless part of debt issuancethe loans costs, totaling R$2,510 (R$2,771 (2010 - R$ 3,080)in December 2011), which will be repaid over the agreement term.

 

Financial covenants – Calculated every quarter upon the disclosure of interim or annual financial statements:

(l)          Promissory notes

- The Company’s ratio of debt service coverage, determined on a consolidated basis, must be higher than or equal to 2.35; and

 

On May 3, 2010, the Company fully paid the 4th issue of promissory notes.- Total adjusted debt over Ebitda, determined on a consolidated basis, must be lower than or equal to 3.65.

 

On August 30, 2010 was issued Promissory Notes amountingThe agreement has a cross default clause, i.e., if a Default Event occurs and continues (whether voluntarily or involuntarily, whether resulting from the effect of any applicable laws or according to R$600,000 as a bridge loan, relatedwith due to an advanceany act or omission to act by any Authority or another one), the IADB through notification to the 13th issueBorrower may order the early maturity of debentures.

The amount obtained fromloan or part of it as specified in the 13th issue of debentures  was fully used to repay the 60 promissory notes of the 5th issue of the Company which had maturity date on February 26, 2011. On January 11, 2011 the 5th issue of promissory notes was fully repaid.notice (including accrued interest rates) and all other obligations are overdue and shall be promptly payable.

 

(m)(n)      International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - IBRD

 

On October 28, 2009, the Company and “The World Bank” – Banco Internacional para Reconstrução do Desenvolvimento (BIRD)International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) signed a contract (the BIRDIBRD agreement 7662BR) amounting to US$ 100,000 thousand.100,000. Resources will be applied in the Environmental Sanitation Program of Alto Tietê springs– Springs Program. The amortization period will start in September 2019, in half-yearly installments and final maturity in 2034. In November2009, a collateral agreement was signed between the Federative Republic of Brazil and IBRD, guaranteeing the provision of funds in order to comply with obligations provided for in the loan agreement. On December 31, 2011,2012, the totalbalance of this agreement amounted to US$26,864 thousand, corresponding to R$54,492 (R$18,928 in December 2011), less part of loans costs in the amount was US$10,316 thousand equivalent to R$ 18,928, net of cost to issue of R$405 (R$424 in December 2011), which will be amortized duringrepaid over the periodagreement term.

F-73


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of the contract.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(n)(o)      Covenants

 

As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the Company had met all the requirements set forth by its loan and financing agreements.agreement.

F-71

(p)      Loans and financing contracted but not used yet

SABESP in order to comply with its investment plan relies on a fund-raising plan.

Financing resources contracted have specific purposes, which are released for the execution of their respective investments.

Agent

December 31, 2012

(in millions of reais (*))

Brazilian Federal Savings Bank

1,125

Japan International Cooperation Agency - JICA

936

Inter-American Development Bank - BID

926

Brazilian Development Bank - BNDES

550

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - BIRD

149

Others

53

TOTAL

3,739

(*) closing quote of 12/31/2012. (US$1.00 = R$2.0435; ¥ 1.00 = R$0.02372).

14        Taxes Payable

(a) Current assets

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2012

 

2011

Taxes recoverable

 

 

 

 

COFINS and PASEP

 

9.038

 

1

Income tax and social contribution

 

100,486

 

85,854

IRRF (withholding income tax) on financial investments

 

14,472

 

31,125

Other federal taxes

 

3,238

 

590

Other state taxes

 

1,251

 

109

Other municipal taxes

 

656

 

437

Total taxes payable

 

129,141

 

118,116

F-74


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The Company obtained from BNDES, for special purpose, the suspension for 13 months of the compliance of covenants as from December 2011.

 

(o)         Maturities of loans and financing(b) Liabilities

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Income tax and social contribution

110

 

-

 

-

 

 

-  

COFINS and PASEP

46,614

 

57,073

 

-

 

-

 

PAES (tax debt refinancing program)

19,011

 

36,716

 

-

 

18,363

 

INSS (Social Security Contribution)

29,412

 

25,645

 

-

 

-

 

IRRF (withholding income tax)

41,607

 

44,172

 

-

 

-

 

Other

16,367

 

17,516

 

-

 

-

 

Total

153,121

 

181,122

 

-

 

18,363

 

 

The following table providesdecrease of R$27,634 in current liabilities mainly arises from the maturitiespayments made in 2012, from the due installments of loans and financing as of December 31, 2010:the Special Tax Installment Payment Program (Paes).

 

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018 to 2035

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In local currency

1,440,633

 

1,057,490

 

574,884

 

485,664

 

219,927

 

222,304

 

1,541,971

 

5,542,874

 

In foreign currency

189,377

 

169,707

 

169,707

 

169,707

 

431,774

 

172,360

 

1,750,789

 

3,053,421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1,630,010

 

1,227,197

 

744,591

 

655,372

 

651,701

 

394,664

 

3,292,760

 

8,596,295

 

The reduction of R$18,363 in noncurrent liabilities occurred as a result of payment and transfer flow of long-term to short term balance of the Parent Company’s Special Tax Installment Payment Program (PAES), according to the information below.

13Other Taxes Payable

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

Noncurrent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COFINS and PASEP

57,073

 

48,149

 

-

 

-

 

PAES (tax debt refinancing program)

36,716

 

35,364

 

18,363

 

53,045

 

INSS (Social Security contribution)

25,645

 

24,112

 

-

 

-

 

IRRF (Withholding taxes)

44,172

 

34,572

 

-

 

-

 

Other

17,516

 

15,853

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

181,122

 

158,050

 

18,363

 

53,045

 

 

The Company applied for enrollment in PAES on July 15, 2003, in accordance with Law No 1068410,684 of May 30, 2003, and included in its application the debts related to COFINS and PASEP which were involved in a legal action challenging application of Law 9718/98, and the outstanding balance under the Tax Recovery Program (REFIS). The original amount included in PAES in July 2003 was R$316,953, as follow:follows:

 

Tax

 

Principal

 

Fine

 

Interest

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COFINS

 

132,499

 

13,250

 

50,994

 

196,743

 

PASEP

 

5,001

 

509

 

2,061

 

7,571

 

REFIS

 

112,639

 

-

 

-

 

112,639

 

Total

 

250,139

 

13,759

 

53,055

 

316,953

 

 

The loan related to PAESPaes (Special Installment Payment) is being paid in 120 months. The amounts paid in 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 were R$37,421, R$36,091 R$ 34,744 and R$ 33,386, 34,744,respectively, and financial expenses of R$ 2,761, R$ 4,1121,353 and R$ 5,585,2,761, respectively, were recorded. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2011 and 20102012 was R$19,011 (R$55,079 and R$ 88,409, respectively.in December 2011). The assets offered as guarantee in REFIS, totaling R$249,034, are still guaranteeing the amounts in the PAES program.

14F-Deferred Income Taxes75

Breakdown of deferred taxes

F-72


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

December
31, 2011

 

December
31, 2010

 

 

 

Deferred income tax assets (i)

 

 

 

Provisions

575,473

 

539,394

Pension obligations – G1

180,018

 

162,552

Pension obligations – G0

85,271

 

85,271

Donations of underlying assets on concession agreements

38,213

 

38,213

Allowance for doubtful account

135,223

 

129,248

Other

78,717

 

50,108

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

1,092,915

 

1,004,786

 

 

 

Deferred income tax liabilities (ii)

 

 

 

Temporary differences of concession intangible assets

(692,210)

 

(711,283)

Capitalization of borrowing costs

(101,507)

 

(102,339)

Profit from public entities

(76,773)

 

(72,968)

Other

(42,962)

 

(39,756)

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

(913,452)

 

(926,346)

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax asset (liability) in the balance sheet

179,463

 

78,440

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

Deferred income tax assets (i)

 

 

 

To be realized within 1 year

259,784

 

281,164

To be realized after 1 year

833,131

 

723,622

Total

1,092,915

 

1,004,786

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax liabilities (ii)

 

 

 

To be realized within 1 year

(27,282)

 

(13,663)

To be realized after 1 year

(886,170)

 

(912,683)

Total

(913,452)

 

(926,346)

 

Net deferred income taxes assets and liabilities

179,463

 

78,440

15        Deferred Taxes and Contributions

 

(i)(a)Balances 

 

 

December 31

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Deferred income tax assets (i)

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

512,107

 

575,473

 

Pension obligations – G1

 

193,125

 

180,018

 

Pension obligations – G0 (1)

 

85,271

 

85,271

 

Donations of underlying assets on concession contracts

 

41,312

 

38,213

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

162,670

 

135,223

 

Other

 

103,254

 

78,717

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

1,097,739

 

1,092,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax liabilities (ii)

 

 

 

 

 

Temporary difference on concession intangible assets

 

(650,093)

 

(692,210)

 

Capitalization of loans costs

 

(158,298)

 

(101,507)

 

Revenue – government entities

 

(77,827)

 

(76,773)

 

Other

 

(70,165)

 

(42,962)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(956,383)

 

(913,452)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax asset, net

 

141,356

 

179,463

 

(1)  The expectationRefers to the installment of the Company’s management is to realize the deferred income tax assetsR$250,798 from accounts receivable adjustment (GESP), which was accrued as loss in 2013 in the same portion of 2012, and the residual amount to be realized in 2014.previous years.

 

(ii)(b)The expectation of the Company’s management is to realize the deferred income tax liabilities in 2013 in the same portion of 2012, and the residual amount to be realized from  2014 then on.Realization 

 

 

December 31

 

 

2012

 

2011

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

to be realized within 1 year

 

193,709

 

259,784

to be realized after 1 year

 

904,030

 

833,131

Total deferred tax assets

 

1,097,739

 

1,092,915

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

to be realized within 1 year

 

(38,267)

 

(27,282)

to be realized after 1 year

 

(918,116)

 

(886,170)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(956,383)

 

(913,452)

Deferred tax assets

 

141,356

 

179,463

 

If occur any relevant fact that modify the expectation, the management will review such projections during the year.

The movements in deferred income tax assets and liabilities in 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:F-76



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Deferred income tax assets

Provisions

 

Pension obligations – G1

 

Pension obligation – G0

 

Donation of underlying assets on concession agreements

 

Allowance for doubtful account

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2008

411,475

 

157,258

 

85,271

 

34,247

 

49,888

 

7,391

 

745,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credited (charged) to income statement

130,036

 

20,478

 

-

 

1,087

 

(2,082)

 

31,880

 

181,399

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

541,511

 

177,736

 

85,271

 

35,334

 

47,806

 

39,271

 

926,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit (changed) to income statement

(2,117)

 

(15,184)

 

-

 

2,879

 

81,442

 

10,837

 

77,857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010

539,394

 

162,552

 

85,271

 

38,213

 

129,248

 

50,108

 

1,004,786

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit (changed) to income statement

36,079

 

17,466

 

-

 

-

 

5,975

 

28,609

 

88,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011

575,473

 

180,018

 

85,271

 

38,213

 

135,223

 

78,717

 

1,092,915

Deferred income tax liabilities

Temporary differences of concession intangible assets

 

 

Capitalization of borrowing costs

 

Profit from public entities

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2008

(758,722)

 

-

 

(74,370)

 

(14,905)

 

(847,997)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credited (charged) to income statement

37,102

 

(66,507)

 

1,365

 

(7,256)

 

(35,296)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

(721,620)

 

(66,507)

 

(73,005)

 

(22,161)

 

(883,293)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit (changed) to income statement

10,337

 

(35,832)

 

37

 

(17,595)

 

(43,053)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010

(711,283)

 

(102,339)

 

(72,968)

 

(39,756)

 

(926,346)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit (changed) to income statement

19,073

 

832

 

(3,805)

 

(3,206)

 

12,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011

(692,210)

 

(101,507)

 

(76,773)

 

(42,962)

 

(913,452)

 

 

(c)Changes 

Deferred income tax assets

Provisions

 

Pension obligations

– G1

 

Pension obligations

– G0

 

Donations of underlying assets on concession contracts

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

Other

 

Total

As of December 31,2009

541,511

 

177,736

 

85,271

 

35,334

 

47,806

 

39,271

 

926,929

Recorded in the income statement

(2,117)

 

(15,184)

 

-

 

2,879

 

81,442

 

10,837

 

77,857

As of December 31,2010

539,394

 

162,552

 

85,271

 

38,213

 

129,248

 

50,108

 

1,004,786

Recorded in the income statement

36,079

 

17,466

 

-

 

-

 

5,975

 

28,609

 

88,129

As of December 31, 2011

575,473

 

180,018

 

85,271

 

38,213

 

135,223

 

78,717

 

1,092,915

Recorded in the income statement

(63,366)

 

13,107

 

-

 

3,099

 

27,447

 

24,537

 

4,824

As of December 31, 2012

512,107

 

193,125

 

85,271

 

41,312

 

162,670

 

103,254

 

1,097,739

Deferred income tax liabilities

Temporary difference of concession intangible assets

 

Capitalization of loans costs

 

Revenue – government agencies

 

Other

 

Total

As of December 31, 2009

(721,620)

 

(66,507)

 

(73,005)

 

(22,161)

 

(883,293)

Recorded in the income statement

10,337

 

(35,832)

 

37

 

(17,595)

 

(43,053)

As of December 31, 2010

(711,283)

 

(102,339)

 

(72,968)

 

(39,756)

 

(926,346)

Recorded in the income statement

19,073

 

832

 

(3,805)

 

(3,206)

 

12,894

As of December 31, 2011

(692,210)

 

(101,507)

 

(76,773)

 

(42,962)

 

(913,452)

Recorded in the income statement

42,117

 

(56,791)

 

(1,054)

 

(27,203)

 

(42,931)

As of December 31, 2012

(650,093)

 

(158,298)

 

(77,827)

 

(70,165)

 

(956,383)

F-77


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(d)Reconciliation of the effective tax rate

 

The amounts recorded as income and social contribution tax expenses in the financial statements are reconciled to the statutory rates, as shown below:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Profit before income taxes

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

 

2,110,352

2,543,904

 

1,720,746

 

2,292,756

Statutory rate

34%

 

34%

 

34%

34%

 

34%

 

34%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated expenses at statutory rate

(585,054)

 

(779,537)

 

(717,520)

(864,927)

 

(585,054)

 

(779,537)

Tax benefits from interest on shareholders' equity

122,170

 

131,658

 

134,013

Permanent differences

 

 

 

 

 

Tax benefits from interest on shareholders’ equity

252,355

 

122,170

 

131,658

Permanent difference

 

 

 

 

 

Provisional Law 4819/58 (i)

(32,514)

 

(87,118)

 

(24,088)

Donations

(13,692)

 

(2,820)

 

2,020

(11,447)

 

(13,692)

 

(2,820)

Recovery of tax credits

-

 

37,858

 

-

Other differences

(20,751)

 

(11,610)

 

(21,118)

24,529

 

28,509

 

12,478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax and social contribution

(497,327)

 

(662,309)

 

(602,605)

(632,004)

 

(497,327)

 

(662,309)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current income tax and social contribution

(598,303)

 

(697,115)

 

(748,708)

(594,052)

 

(598,303)

 

(697,115)

Deferred income tax and social contribution

100,976

 

34,806

 

146,103

(37,952)

 

100,976

 

34,806

Effective rate

29%

 

29%

 

29%

25%

 

29%

 

29%

(i)        Permanent difference related to the provision for actuarial liability (Note 8 (vii)).

 

Transition Tax Regime (RTT)

 

TheFor purpose to calculate the income tax and the social contribution related to 2010 and 2009, the Company opted to adopt the Transition Tax Regime (RTT), established bywhich allow eliminate the accounting effects of the Law 11,638/07 and the Provisional Measure 449/08, converted into Law No. 11,941/2009. Accordingly,2009, by the effects fromregisters in the changesin Law 11,638/07fiscal books – LALUR and from articles 36subsidiary controls, without any modification in the bookkeeping.

Since 2008, the Company has adopted the same fiscal practices, since RTT commenced being obligatory and 37will be valid until the issue of a law that consider the fiscal effects of the said Provisional Measure had no effects for tax purposes.new accounting methods.


Companhia de Saneamento Básico16        Provisions

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated


Due to the adoption of this regime, the Company maintained the tax incentives arising from donations and government´s investment subsidy and the tax deductibility for debt issuance cost on loans and financing.

15Provisions 

 

(a)   Lawsuits with probable likelihood of loss

(i) Balances

F-78


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

The Company is party to a number of claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including civil, tax, labor and environmental matters. Management, based on a jointly analysis with its legal advisors, recognized provisions at an amount considered sufficient to cover probable losses. These provisions, net of escrow deposits based on the legal right to offset, are as follows:

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Provisions

Escrow deposits

December 31, 2012

 

 

Provisions

Escrow deposits

December 31, 2011

Customer claims (i)

618,533

 

659,182

652,663

(131,408)

521,255

 

727,261

(108,728)

618,533

Supplier claims (ii)

420,767

 

372,035

290,593

(175,437)

115,156

 

422,595

(1,828)

420,767

Other civil claims (iii)

178,366

 

167,628

169,516

(4,978)

164,538

 

188,546

(10,180)

178,366

Tax claims (iv)

76,448

 

58,658

71,141

(3,056)

68,085

 

76,448

-

76,448

Labor claims (v)

156,536

 

137,232

173,227

(1,529)

171,698

 

156,536

-

156,536

Environmental claims (vi)

121,179

 

65,095

149,061

(636)

148,425

 

121,179

-

121,179

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1,571,829

 

1,459,830

1,506,201

(317,044)

1,189,157

 

1,692,565

(120,736)

1,571,829

 

 

 

 

 

Current

764,070

 

766,603

565,083

-

565,083

 

764,070

-

764,070

Noncurrent

807,759

 

693,227

941,118

(317,044)

624,074

 

928,495

(120,736)

807,759

 

(ii) Changes to the provisions for the year ended December 31, 2011

              

 

 

 

 

 

Payments

 

Interest and

 

 

 

December

 

 

 

and

 

Inflation

 

December

 

31, 2010

 

Additions

 

reversals

 

adjustment

 

31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer claims

770,205

 

136,026

 

(159,161)

 

(19,809)

 

727,261

Supplier claims

372,889

 

10,199

 

(483)

 

39,990

 

422,595

Other civil claims

175,932

 

28,983

 

(26,272)

 

9,903

 

188,546

Tax claims

58,658

 

6,944

 

(1,141)

 

11,987

 

76,448

Labor claims

137,232

 

39,126

 

(33,938)

 

14,116

 

156,536

Environmental claims

65,095

 

81,305

 

(25,341)

 

120

 

121,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal

1,580,011

 

302,583

 

(246,336)

 

56,307

 

1,692,565

Escrow deposits

(120,181)

 

(14,360)

 

18,785

 

(4,980)

 

(120,736)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1,459,830

 

288,223

 

(227,551)

 

51,327

 

1,571,829

 

December 31, 2011

Additional provisions

Interest and inflation adjustment

Amounts used from provision

Amounts not used

(reversal)

December 31, 2012

Customer claims (i)

727,261

93,972

80,858

(68,000)

(181,428)

652,663

Supplier claims (ii)

422,595

17,575

36,393

(174,482)

(11,488)

290,593

Other civil claims (iii)

188,546

22,788

24,501

(7,495)

(58,824)

169,516

Tax claims (iv)

76,448

10,279

7,365

(10,057)

(12,894)

71,141

Labor claims (v)

156,536

142,976

34,056

(126,787)

(33,554)

173,227

Environmental claims (vi)

121,179

37,496

9,383

(8,801)

(10,196)

149,061

Subtotal

1,692,565

325,086

192,556

(395,622)

(308,384)

1,506,201

Escrow deposits

(120,736)

(200,982)

(13,840)

12,736

5,778

(317,044)

Total

1,571,829

124,104

178,716

(382,886)

(302,606)

1,189,157

 

The total amount paid during the year related to judicial lawsuit was R$ 197,521 (R$ 330,256 - December 31, 2010).

 

(b)      Lawsuits with possible likelihood of loss

 

The lawsuits in course in administrative and judicial levels where the Company is the defendant consideredparty to lawsuits and administrative proceedings relating to environmental, tax, civil and labor claims, which are assessed by management and its legal advisors and consultants of possible likelihoodManagement whose chances of loss are possible and are not being, for this reason, provisioned in the financial statements,recorded. Liability contingencies, classified as possible loss, are represented as follows:

F-75

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Customer claims (i)

 

862,100

 

844,100

Supplier claims (ii)

 

775,200

 

699,300

Other civil claims (iii)

 

362,200

 

359,600

Tax claims (iv)

 

490,900

 

420,400

Labor claims (v)

 

190,000

 

145,100

Environmental claims (vi)

 

116,300

 

153,300

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

2,796,700

 

2,621,800

F-79


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(c)      Explanation on the nature of main classes of lawsuits

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Customer claims (i)

844,100

 

827,500

Supplier claims (ii)

699,300

 

606,600

Other civil claims (iii)

359,600

 

275,200

Tax claims (iv)

420,400

 

348,900

Labor claims (v)

145,100

 

127,800

Environmental claims (vi)

153,300

 

111,900

 

 

 

 

Total

2,621,800

 

2,297,900

 

(i)    Customer claims

 

Approximately 1,5001,560 lawsuits were filed by commercial customers, which claim that their tariffs should be equalcorrespond to other consumer categories, and 440 lawsuits which claim a reduction in the tariffs of another consumer category, and therefore claimsewage tariff due to losses in the system, consequently requesting the refund of amounts charged by the amounts collected by SABESP.Company. The Company was granted both favorable and unfavorable final decisions at several courts,court levels and recognized a provisionprovisions when the likelihoodchances of loss is consideredlosses are probable. The change of R$ 40.6 million (net of escrow deposit)97,278 decrease in the lawsuits classified as probable loss (see item “a” above) arose from(net of escrow deposits) relates to the changepayments made in the likelihoodyear and revisions of ongoing lawsuits, interest, fees and adjustments.expectations caused by favorable decisions to the Company in 2012.

 

(ii)  Supplier claims

 

Suppliers'Suppliers’ claims include claimslawsuits filed by some construction companiessuppliers alleging an underpayment of monetary adjustments,restatements, withholding of amounts related to the understatement of officialunderstated inflation rates after thederiving from Real economic plan, and the economic and financial imbalance of the agreements. These lawsuits are in progress at different courts and a provision is recognized when the likelihoodchances of loss is

consideredlosses are probable. In 2011, the increase ofThe R$ 48.7 million and R$ 92.7 million (net of escrow deposit)305,611 decrease in lawsuits whose likelihood of loss is considered probable (net of escrow deposits) is related to the payments made in the period, and the R$75,900 increase in lawsuits whose likelihood of loss is considered possible respectively, is related to interest, fees and inclusionupdate of monetary restatement of the lawsuits in course.progress.

 

(iii)    Other civil claims

 

The Company is a party to several civil lawsuits related to indemnities for property damage, pain and suffering, and loss of profits allegedly caused to third parties. As of December 31, 2011, totalparties, filled at different court levels, dully accrued amount ofwhen classified as probable losses. The R$ 178.4 million (December 31, 2010 - R$ 167.7 million) refers to claims with a likelihood of loss is considered probable. There was an increase in13,828 decrease, for lawsuits with probable and possible riskchances of loss, arising fromwas due to favorable decisions to the increaseCompany and payments made in lawsuits and comprising monetary adjustment, interest and fees.2012. 

 

(iv) Tax claims

 

F-80


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

The provision for tax contingenciesrisks refers mainly to issues related to tax collections challenged due to differences in the interpretation of legislation by the Company's legal advisors.Management, accrued when classified as probable loss. The R$70,500 increase in lawsuits with chances of R$71.5 million in the lawsuit considered as possible losslosses is mainly related to monetary adjustments of the lawsuit claimedrestatement deriving from lawsuits filed by the municipality of São Paulo, related to ISS (services tax) collection, as describedoutlined in item (b)“b” below.

 

(a) In 2006, the Federal Revenue Service, by means of a tax execution, auditedassessed the Company's compliance with the tax obligations related to income tax and social contribution for calendar year 2001, and recognized taxes payable adjusted through December 31, 2012 in the amount of R$ 379.3 million, adjusted through389,505 (R$379,277 in December 31, 2011 (R$ 357.7 million in 2010)2011). The Company filed a timely objection and will appeal against the tax assessment at administrative level and in courts. According to legal advisors,Managements considers that the likelihood of loss of this administrative proceeding is approximately 90% considered remote to approximately 90% and 10% is considered possible.

 

(b) The company filed for a preliminary injunction to challenge the revocation of the tax on service revenue exemption granted by the Municipality of São Paulo, under a City Law enacted in 2002. In April 2003, the exemption was granted and the tax payment was suspended by an injunction. InMay 2005, the courts issued a decision overruling the injunction. In July 2005, SABESP filed an appeal to ensure the preliminary injunction granted remained in effect. In January 2012, the appeal was denied, and due to omission existing in the decision the Company filed an amendment of judgment including the requesting for modification of the decision, which is awaiting judgment. The assessment note filed by the municipality of São Paulo requestingthrough law revoked the services tax creditexemption which until them the company withheld and thereafter issued tax deficiency notices related to ISS (municipal tax)the sewage service and penalties due to non accomplishment of the duties, are in place the injunction concededancillary activities, in the precautionary action, still awaiting judgment to annul the administrative decision.  As of December 31, 2011, the estimatedupdated amount of R$264,627 (December/2011 – R$224,349), which currently are subject-matter of Tax Foreclosures, classified by the claimManagement as possible losses. SABESP filed a writ of mandamus against this revocation, which was rejected, and currently is R$ 223.9 million (R$ 178.7 millionunder phase of appealability of Special and Extraordinary Appeals filed. Writs of prevention and actions for annulment were also filed, aiming the suspension of enforceability of credits and the annulment of tax deficiency notices, as it understands that notwithstanding the exemption revocation, the sewage activities and ancillary activities are not included in 2010). The Company's legal advisorsthe list of activities subject to taxation by municipality. Since there is no final decision on the merit, the Company’s Management assessed the likelihood of lossrisk as possible.

F-76


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

possible losses.

 

(c) The Federal Revenue Service rejected some offset requests made by the Company for the extinction of IRPJ/CSLL payable, using favorable amounts, arising from undue payments of IRPJ/CSLL, which were paid based on monthly estimates. The amount involved is estimated at R$ 44.7 millionwas adjusted through December 31, 20112012 and is estimated at R$47,498 (R$ 40.9 million44,668 in 2010)December 2011). The legal advisorsManagement assessed it has a possible loss.

 

(d) The Company requested an authorization to offset the Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL) of the period of July, August and September 2002 against the amount of IRPJ paid in excess in 1997 and 1998, due to reallocation of monetary adjustments inrestatement over the financial statements (Law 8,200/8.200/91), which werewas anticipated in 1996 due to aan injunction, after excluded due to the giveby giving up of the process and acceptance ofadopted the Provisional Measure 38/02, which was rejected. After the judgment by the02. The Administrative CouncilCounsel of tax resources,Fiscal Resources rejected the credit related to 1997 was not accepted.from 1997. The estimated amount is R$ 41.0 million as of42,403 on December 31, 20112012 (R$ 39.1 million40,976 in 2010)December 2011). The Company´s legal advisorsManagement assessed this claim as a possible loss.

 

(e) On June 23, 2010, the Company and the municipality of São Paulo signed an agreement to provide water supply and sewage services. The negotiation of this agreement led to the extinction of some judicial lawsuits.  However,lawsuits, but others didwere not take place inpart of the adjustmentreferredagreement, and are continuing regularly.lawsuit proceeds as usual.  The remaining judicial lawsuits considered as probablepossible and possibleprobable loss are mainly related to taxes and fines. As of December 31, 20112012 the amounts of such judicial lawsuits were R$ 27.7 million23,882 and R$ 30.6 million, respectively39,063 (R$ 22.3 million27,690 and R$27.2 million, respectively,30,118 in 2010)December 2011, respectively).

F-81


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(f) In 2005, the Federal Revenue Service partially rejected the Company´s request of offsetting tax credits related to the Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and the Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL) in the amount of approximately R$ 56.1 million,56,118, and R$ 8.7 million,8,659, respectively, which relate to the period from January to April 2003, for which the Company offset prior year IRPJ and CSLL negative balances. The amounts not ratified by the authority of IRPJ and CSLL are R$ 11.2 million11,164 and R$ 0.7 million, respectively,698, totaling R$11.911,862 million. As the Company obtained a partial favorable decision on this matter, the Company´s legal advisorsManagement believe likelihood of loss amounts to R$ 6.5 million6,782 (R$6,541 in December 2011) and R$ 1.1 million1,157 (R$1,116 in December 2011) are possible and probable, respectively (R$6.2 million and R$ 1.1 million, respectively, in 2010).respectively.

 

(g) The CompanySABESP filed lawsuits againsttwo writs of mandamus pleading the Municipalitiesdeclaration of Bragança Paulista and São Paulo due to the collection by these municipalities of a charge on the use of public areas to install the structures used for the water supply and sewage services. In the lawsuit filed against the Municipality of Bragança Paulista, the Company granted a preliminary injunction related to this charge which prevents the municipality from any current or future of charge collection until is the Company reaches a final court decision on this matter. In June 2005, the Company got a favorable decision of the lower court and the initial remedy was maintained. The municipality appealed against the decision, which has not been decided by the Court of Appeals yet. With respect to the Municipality of São Paulo, the Company got an unfavorable decision in the lower court which issued a decision confirming the legality of theunconstitutional municipal charge. The Company filed an appeal and awaits the judgment. Subsequently, a new law was approved regarding the implementation ofthat levies the collection of a charge ontaxes deriving from the use of public areas in the Municipalitywater and sewage network installation for the rendering of São Paulo. In April 2004,basic sanitation public utilities. The first writ of mandamus was partially granted relief, but will not have any effect because municipal laws were revoked and the Company filed an injunction to suspendsecond writ of mandamus awaits judgment on the municipality’s appeal, as this writ of mandamus was granted relief suspending the collection for the use of the municipal charge.urban soil and tendering of collateral. The Company had a favorable decision of the lower court, as the injunction was granted which recognizes the municipal charge as undue. The municipality filed an appeal, which was denied by the Court of Justice. The Company's legal advisorsManagement assessed the likelihoodrisk as possible loss, but it was not possible to estimate the amount involved, as it would be necessary to know the extension of gainwater and sewage networks and other equipment installed in the municipality’s urban soil (public areas), as well as define the amount of related property based on this matter as a possible.

F-77


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statementsmetreage applied.

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

(v)   Labor claims

 

The Company is a party to labor lawsuits, involving issues such as overtime, shift schedule, health hazard premium and hazardous duty premium, prior notice, change of function, salary equalization, and other. Part of the amount involved is in provisional or final execution assessed theat various court levels, and thus is classified as of probable or possible loss. The Company recognized a provision for claims which likelihood of loss asis considered probable. The R$15,162 addition in lawsuits with probable chances of losses is mainly due to the additional provision for issues related to overtime and consequently, recordedshift schedule, offset by payments mainly referring to shift schedule. The R$44,900 addition in the financial statements.  

(a)On January 27, 2005, the São Paulo Water, Sewage and Environmental Workers' Union ("Sintaema") filed a lawsuit against the Company, claiming compensation for work shifts, which was dismissed by the lower court under Company arguments that Sintaema did not have legitimacy to file such lawsuit. However, the Labor Regional Court overruled this decision favorably to Sintaema and required that the lawsuit returnedlawsuits with possible chances of losses is due to the original court for judgment. The Company appealed to the Superior Labor Court but did not succeeded. The lawsuit returned to the original court and was accepted. The Company appealed but the Labor Regional Court maintained the decision and afterincreased number of lawsuits filed an appeal in the Superior Court, which was not admitted and the lawsuit had a final decision and initiate the execution. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's legal advisors assess the likelihood of loss, totaling R$ 62.6 million (R$ 55.9 million in 2010), as probable.

(b)The São Paulo Water, Sewage and Environmental Workers' Union ("Sintaema") and other unions, filed a lawsuit against the Company claiming for, among other matters, over time rate at 100% and a 1.5% salary increase over inflation for the years of 2010 and 2011. The Labor Regional Court decided partially favorably to Sintaema and conceded to the employees over time rate at 100%, 1.5% salary increase, and other items. The Company appealed to the Superior Labor Court to suspend such decision, which was accepted. Currently, the Company awaits the judgment. The Company's legal advisors assess the likelihood of loss, totaling R$ 11.8 million (R$ 10.5 million in 2010), as probable.2012.

 

(vi) Environmental claims

 

The public civil actionsEnvironmental claims refer to which the Company is party include the following:

(a)          Public civil actionseveral administrative proceedings and lawsuits filed by Paraguaçu Paulista city against SABESP requestinggovernment entities, including Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental – Cetesb, Public Prosecution Office of the courtState of São Paulo and others, that aim affirmative and negative covenants and penalty is estimated due to sentencefailure to comply in addition to the imposition of indemnity due to environmental damages allegedly caused by the Company. The amounts accrued represent the best estimate of the Company to environmental damages caused bydate, however, may differ from the disposal of sewage “in natura” in the Alegre River, located in the city of Paraguaçu Paulista. The decision was unfavorable to SABESP in the lower court and the court ordered to: (a) cease the disposal of sewage “in natura” in the Alegre River; (b) invest in the water and sewage service system of Paraguaçu Paulista city; and (c) indemnity the city for the environmental damages, amounting to R$ 168.9 million. The decision also determines that the noncompliance of items (a) and (b) would incur in daily penalties. The Company filed an appeal against this decision. On September 21, 2006, the court of justice of the state of São Paulo sustained the decision. The Company signed an agreement with the Public Prosecutor amounting to R$ 42.7 million lasting 54 months to the execution of the investments, R$34.0 million of this amount refers to the compensation of the environmental damages. There are some issues related to the accomplishment of the agreement. The Company's legal advisors' assessed the likelihood of loss as probable. The amount on December 31, 2011 corresponds to R$ 43.7 million (R$ 15 in 2010).

(b)          A public civil action filed by the Public Prosecution Office against SABESP which result was unfavorable. SABESP was condemned to: (i) stop disposing untreated sewage in the fluvial system, a under a penalty of R$ 150 for each illegal act; ii) invest in water supply and sewage treatment system in the municipality of Guarei, considering that all necessary actions to have water supply and sewage treatment system concluded in 180 days, under a penalty of R$ 100 per day for noncompliance; iii) indemnity of environmental damages to be evaluated at the enddisbursed as indemnity to alleged damages, in view of the action. SABESP filed an appeal and awaits the decision. Ascurrent stage of December 31, 2011, the amount provisioned for this claim was R$ 38.4 million (R$ 4.4 million in 2010). The Company's legal advisors' assessed the likelihood of loss as probable.referred proceedings.

(c)          Public civil action filed by the Public Prosecution Office against SABESP and the City of Cotiaseeking individual and joint sentencing of the defendants to: (i) the termination of untreated water effluents discharges into the Cotia River or its tributaries, subject to a daily fine in the case of noncompliance; (ii) the treatment of sewage prior to discharging it into the Cotia River, subject to a daily fine, in the event of noncompliance;(iii) the full restoration of soil, of surface and underground water bodies and of vegetation to their original condition, subject to a daily fine, in the event of noncompliance; and(iv) the payment of compensation for environmental damages caused to soil, to water sources and to underground and surface water bodies that cannot be recovered. The appellate court rendered favorable decisions to us with respect to items (i), (iii) and (iv) above. According to evaluations by the court's technical expert, on October 17 2006, compensation for environmental damages was R$ 827 or, alternatively, R$ 5.8 million, if the Company includes the damages caused to the river banks (Cotia river). This amount is still under discussion and its approval is subject to a final decision by a lower court. As of December 31, 2011, the restated amount of the expert's report is R$ 11.6 million (R$ 10.7 million in 2010). The Company's legal advisors' assessed the likelihood of loss as probable.F-82

F-78


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(d)          The municipality of Águas de São Pedro filed a public civil action requesting SABESP to implement projects to remove sewage disposals from green areas, fountain and the Pantanal Lake located at the Pinheiros  Street in the municipality of Águas de São Pedro. This claim is also includes, indemnities due to environmental damages and attorney’s fees. The Company got a favorable decision of the lower court. The Company got an unfavorable decision of the Court of Justice and had 180 days to implement the necessary sewage services and to develop an environmental study for remediation. The Court of Justice also established a fine of R$ 5 per day. The Company filed amendment of judgment which was denied. The Company filed extreme resources related to this decision. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the total amount of the fine was R$ 2.0 million (R$ 14.0 million in 2010). The Company's legal advisors assess the likelihood of loss as probable.

(e)          A public civil action filed by the Public Prosecution Office against SABESP which result was unfavorable. SABESP was condemned to: (i) stop disposing untreated sewage in the São Sebastião’s channel before getting the operating and inspection licenses, under a penalty of R$ 100 per day; ii) obligation to prepare and maintain the operation of the EPC (Pre-conditioning station) Araçá with the respective operating and inspection licenses, under a penalty of R$ 100 per day; iii) stop disposing untreated domicile sewage in the São Sebastião’s channel; iv) comply with all requirements of the inspection and operating licenses, including the requirements from CETESB; v) pay indemnity of R$ 50 million regarding environmental damages. The Company must present to the court the operating and inspection licenses  of Araçá in 6 months, under a penalty of R$ 100 per day. The Company must also contract an expert to prepare an environmental study, in 30 days To collect and analyze the São Sebastião’s channel and in the beaches which are within 8 kilometers to south and to north, besides the mangrove swamp, that must be analyzed the quality of the water and sediments. The auditors will check the concentration of faecal coliforms, monthly reports which will be denominated as independent auditors report. This action is commencing and the Company awaits the judgment in lower court. As of December 31, 2011, this claim amounted to R$ 123.4 million (R$ 78.1 million in 2010). The Company's legal advisors' assessed the likelihood of loss as possible.

(f)           Public civil action filed by the São Paulo Public Prosecution Office against SABESP and the Municipality of Piracaia seeking conviction of the defendants for the obligation not to discharge untreated household sewage into the Atibaia river, which is not in compliance with the quality standards provided for in law, under the penalty of specific execution or a daily fine. This lawsuit is awaiting ruling at the lower courts, but there was a change in the principal amount from R$ 3.5 million to R$ 100. As of December 31, 2011, the restated amount of this lawsuit is R$ 262 (R$ 9.6 million in 2010). The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a possible loss.

The Company is a party to other environmental lawsuits in municipalities where it operates, arising from the discharge of untreated waste, assessed as probable and possible risks of loss by legal advisors. The amounts recognized as provisions do not always represent the final amount to be disbursed as indemnity of alleged damages, in view of the current stage in which the such lawsuits are and management's ability to reasonably estimate the amounts of future disbursements. As of December 31, 2011, total accrued amount represents the R$ 121.2 million148,425 (R$ 65.1 million121,179 in December 31, 2010), already including the amounts referred to in items (a), (b), (c) and (d)2011).

F-79


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo -Among the main lawsuits the Company is involved, there are four public civil actions the subject-matters of which are: a) sentence SABESP

Notes to restrain itself from discharging or releasing sewage without due treatment; b) invest in the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amountswater and sewage treatment system of the municipality, under the penalty of paying a fine; c) payment of indemnity due to environmental damages, amongst others. On December 31, 2012, the Management classified part of lawsuits as probable chances of losses, in thousandsthe amount of reais, unless otherwise indicatedR$127,514 (December/2011 – R$93,782) and another part as possible losses in the amount of R$85,081.

 

(vii)   Settlements reached in 20112012

 

In 2011During 2012, the Company assignedsettled several settlements relatedlegal and administrative proceedings, and most of them totaled R$67,417. Out of this amount, R$58,742 refers to investments and R$8,675 refer to environmental issues which were bookedcompensations, the later, recorded as follows:

(a)Águas de Santa Barbara

On August 5, 2011,“other liabilities”, under the Company and the Justice DepartmentStatement of municipality of Águas de Santa Barbara signed a judicial agreement for the construction and provision of sewage servicesFinancial Position. The accumulated balance on December 31, 2012, referring to the entire domestic sewage produced in the municipality of Águas de Santa Barbara and thethese environmental compensation, the mapping of the riparian forest area of the existing municipality and to be recomposed. The estimated investment is R$ 6.1 million and the estimated cost of the forest recovery is R$ 200.

(b)Campos do Jordão

On July 11, 2011, the Company and Justice Department of municipality of Campos do Jordão signed a judicial agreement for the construction of the sewage service system in the municipality of Campos do Jordão, amountingliabilities amounted to R$108.7 million. The environmental recovery represents indemnities caused by environmental damages and related daily fines, amounting to R$ 850. The environmental social center amounting to R$ 440 and an advance for construction amounting to R$ 41 million were also negotiated in this agreement.28,976.

(c)Mococa 

On May 3, 2011, the Company, the São Paulo State Prosecution Office and the Justice Department of municipality of Ribeirão Preto signed a term of conduct regarding the construction of sewage service system in the municipality of Mococa and Igaraí district. The estimated cost amounts to R$ 2.9 million.

 

(viii) Other concession-related legal proceedings

 

(a)          On March 25, 2005, the municipality of Itapira revoked the concession contract and filed an Assets Repossession Action against SABESP. The outcome of this claim was unfavorable to the Company. Besides that, was enacted a municipal law which revoke the prior law which authorized the municipality to celebrate agreements with SABESP. The Company appealedis a party to concessions-related proceedings, cases in which it can lose the decision, but in viewright of the compensation lawsuit filed against the aforementioned municipality, the Company has waived the appeal. Company's legal advisors assessed it as a possible gain.

(b)          The municipality of Cajobi has filed a Repossession Action that seeks the takeover the water supply and sewage services, and sentencing the Company to pay for losses and damages for amounts received as water and sewage tariffs not received in view of utilities explored since the enactment of the Municipal Decree, and for the use of assets related to the concession. The court decision confirmed the Municipality's takeover of the water and sewage services. On August 25, 2008, SABESP filed an appeal which was denied. The Municipality providesoperating water supply and sewage collection services since May 29, 2007 under injunctionin few municipalities, including the following: a) the municipality of Cajobi filed action against SABESP claiming possession, which was granted relief and maintained the municipality in the interlocutory appeal. The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a possible gain.

(c)          The Citypossession of Araçoiaba da Serra filed a Repossession Action seeking an authorization to enter concession-related facilities, including all properties and chattels linked to the water supply and sewage treatment services. The Municipality is now managingassets and operating these services, in view ofassessed as probable losses; b) the termination of the concession agreement on September 23, 2006. The Municipality also claims the definitive takeoverof the services, including due handover of all assets, rights and privileges previously transferred to SABESP. The initially granted injunction and confirmed by the appellate court maintain the Municipality as the service provider. The decision was considered unfavorable for the Company and the Company filed an appeal against this decision. The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a possible loss.

F-80


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

(d)          On July 2, 2010, the Citymunicipality of Tarumã filed a writ of prevention related to all assets related toagainst SABESP, and the collection, treatment and water supply and sewage services systems. Initially,operation is maintained but the Court concededfinal decision is pending, with expected possible losses; c) The Company filed an injunction, which was reviewed and on January 19, 2011 the Company restarted its operation in this municipality. By other injunction decision, the Tarumã municipality requested the enrollment of assets existing and utilized in the water and sewage services in the municipality, determining that the assets will be under SABESP´s custody due to eventual liquidation of the indemnity to SABESP. By judicial injunction there was the enrollment of assets and SABESP will be the depositary. Both actions are in the phase of knowing and there is no definite decision. The Company's legal advisors assessed it as possible and remote loss, respectively.

(e)          In December 2, 1997,ordinary action against the municipality of Santos, enactedthe operation is maintained and there is a law expropriating the Company's water and sewerage mains in Santos. The Company requested an injunction against the expropriation which was denied by the lower court. This decision was subsequently reversed by the State of São Paulo appellate court, which then issued an injunction suspending the law. The Company was granted a favorablefinal decision at the lowerappellate court and the municipality of Santos appealed against the decision. Although the decision was maintained by the Court of Justice, it is not final. Despite the pending action, the Company is operating the water supply and sewage collection systems in the municipality of Santos.    The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a probable gain.

(f)           The municipality of Tuiuti has brought a declaratory action seeking to recognize the inexistence of any judicial or legal grounds to justify our permanence as the provider of water supply and sewage services in the municipality of Tuiuti, and the subsequent taking over of these services by the municipality. The Company responded with a counterclaim against the municipality seeking a statement corroborating the existence of a legal relationship between the two parties for subsequent compensation for investments made. The lower court decision was partially unfavorablefavorable to SABESP, as it declared that there was no legal relationship between the Municipality and SABESP relate to the service concession and confirmed the injunction authorizing the takeover of the services. However, the court's decision was favorable to the counterclaim filed by SABESP and sentenced the Municipality to pay R$ 541, restated from March 1996.with expected remote losses; d) The Company filed an appeal on July 22, 2009. On the other hand, the Municipality also filed an appeal. The State Appellate Court partially agreed with SABESP to increase the indemnity to R$ 1.1 million (December/1995). SABESP is not operating in this municipality as required by injunction granted to the Municipality. The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a probable gain.

(g)          On January 12, 2001, the Company filed an ordinary action against the municipality of Presidente Prudente, for the purpose of recognizing the contractual rightoperation is maintained and there is an appellate court decision favorable to maintain SABESP, as the sanitation service until the legal and formal cancellation of the contract, including the respective indemnity, which recognizes the abusive and illegal the acts of the municipality.with expected remote losses; e) The Company still provides sanitation service in Presidente Prudente by judicial decision, which extended the concession contract of Presidente Prudente up to the payment of the indemnity. The Company's legal advisors assessed it as a remote loss.

(h)          On March 15, 2011, the Company filed an asset repossession action to recover possession against the municipality of Álvares Florence, relatedand trial court’s decision was unfavorable to SABESP; the assets of the concession used in the water and sewage services system, including the entire assets related to the water and sanitation services, managing, operating and exploring again the services, as prior to the repossession forced by the municipality after the period of the contract. In the end request the definitive repossession assuring the maintenance of the sanitation services.operation is not maintained with expected possible losses; f) The decision of the lower court was against the Company and the Company appealed against this decision, which is pending. The Company’s legal advisors assessed it as possible gain.

(i)On August 19, 2011, the Company filed an asset repossession action to recover possession against the municipality of Macatuba relatedaiming with injunction return to the assetspossession of thefacilities under concession, used in the water and sewage services system, including the entire assets related to the water and sanitation services, managing, operating and exploring again the services, as prior to the end of the contract. The decision of the injunction was unfavorable to SABESPrejected and the Companyoperation is not operating in this municipality. The action is awaiting the decision of the lower court. The Company is also requiring indemnities related to the investments realizedmaintained in the municipality up to this present date, with expected possible losses; g) The Company filed an action to recover possession against the municipality of Iperó, which was not amortized. The Company’s legal advisorsdeemed groundless at trial court and appellate court’s decision is pending.

assessed it as possible gain.17        Employee Benefits

F-83

F-81


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

(j)After the end of the concession contract the municipality of Iperó requested the resumption of the services.  On December 30, 2009, the Company filed an asset repossession action against the municipality of Iperó requiring the repossession until the payment of the indemnity. Initially, the injunction was obtained conceding the Company the maintenance of the operation. After the decision in the lower court was unfavorable to SABESP. The Company appealed but there was no change in the result. The municipality is operating the services. The action of repossession was unfavorable to SABESP and is awaiting the result of the appealed action. The Company is also promoting a precautionary action to anticipate proves, in which the injunction was conceded to list the assets which belonged to the services. The experts are analyzing the list. The Company’s legal advisors assessed it as remote gain.

16 Employee Benefits

(a)      Health benefit plan

 

The health benefit plan is managed by Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social - SABESPREV and consists of optional, free choice, health plans sponsored by contributions of SABESP and the active participants, as follows:

 

.     Company - 7.5%7.8% (December 31, 20102011 - 7.6%7.5%) on average, of gross payroll;

 

.     Participating employees - 3.21% of base salary and premiums, equivalent to 2.2%2.1% of gross payroll, on average.

 

(b)      Pension plan benefits

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Funded plan – G1 (i)

 

 

 

 

 

Present value of defined benefit obligations

 

2,262,440

 

1,638,220

 

Fair value of the plan assets

 

(1,657,608)

 

(1,203,493)

 

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)

 

(27,663)

 

103,892

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net liabilities recognized for defined benefit obligations

 

577,169

 

538,619

 

The amounts recognized in the balance sheet are determined as follows:

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Unfunded plan – G0 (iii)

 

 

 

 

 

Present value of defined benefit obligations

 

1,987,718

 

1,581,600

 

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses) (*)

 

(440,557)

 

(69,522)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net liabilities recognized for defined benefit obligations

 

1,547,161

 

1,512,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liability as per balance sheet – pension obligations

 

2,124,330

 

2,050,697

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Funded plan - G1

 

 

 

Present value of obligations

1,638,220

 

1,572,933

Fair value of plan assets

(1,203,493)

 

(1,113,189)

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)

103,892

 

27,588

 

 

 

 

 

538,619

 

487,332

 

 

 

 

Unfunded plan - G0

 

 

 

Present value of defined benefit obligations

1,581,600

 

1,638,036

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)

(69,522)

 

(321,330)

 

 

 

 

 

1,512,078

 

1,316,706

 

 

 

 

Liability as per balance sheet - Pension obligations

2,050,697

 

1,804,038

 

(*) The increase in 2012 was mainly due to a reduction in the discount rate, from 5.75% in 2011 to 4.0% in 2012. Since the Company applied the “corridor” approach, actuarial losses exceeding the “corridor” limit are accounted for in the following years, as described in Note 2.21 (a).

(i)Plan G1

 

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan for its employees ("Plan G1"), which is managed by Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social - SABESPREV, the defined benefit pension plan is sponsored by monthlysimilar contributions established in a plan of subsidy of actuarial study of SABESPREV, as follows: 2.10% from

0.53% of the Companyportion of the salary of participation up to 20 salaries; and 2.3% from

F-84


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

4.5% of the participants.surplus, if any, of the portion of the salary of participation over 20 salaries.

 

As of December 31, 2011,2012, SABESP had a net actuarial liability of R$577,169 (R$538,619 (Decemberas of December 31, 2010 - R$ 487,332)2011) representing the difference between the present value of the Company's defined benefit obligations to the participating employees, retired employees, and pensioners; the fair value of the related assets; and unrecognized actuarial gains.

F-82gains (losses).

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Defined benefit obligation, beginning of year

1,638,220

 

1,572,933

 

Service cost

27,764

 

26,869

 

Interest cost

176,762

 

158,069

 

Actuarial losses (gains)

488,956

 

(57,583)

 

Benefits paid

(69,262)

 

(62,068)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, end of year

2,262,440

 

1,638,220

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

1,203,493

 

1,113,189

 

Expected return on plan assets

147,548

 

111,307

 

Actuarial gain (loss)

357,400

 

18,805

 

Company's contributions

7,411

 

8,853

 

Employees' contributions

11,018

 

13,407

 

Benefits paid

(69,262)

 

(62,068)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

1,657,608

 

1,203,493

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Current service cost

27,764

 

26,869

 

27,200

 

Interest cost

176,762

 

158,069

 

152,470

 

Expected return on plan assets

(147,548)

 

(111,307)

 

(122,630)

 

(Gain) or loss amortization

-

 

-

 

(10,397)

 

Curtailment and partial settlement

-

 

-

 

(61,377)

 

Gain not recognized of curtailment

 -

 

-

 

(15,266)

 

Subtotal

56,978

 

73,631

 

(30,000)

 

Participants contribution

(11,018)

 

(13,407)

 

(15,574)

 

Total recognized in the income statement

45,960

 

60,224

 

(45,574)

 

F-85


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Changes inIn 2012, the present value of defined benefit obligation over the year are as follows:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, beginning of year

1,572,933

 

1,422,993

 

1,433,710

Service cost

26,869

 

27,200

 

31,116

Interest cost

158,069

 

152,470

 

155,514

Actuarial (gain) losses

(57,583)

 

222,510

 

(149,634)

Curtailment and partial settlement

-

 

(195,561)

 

-

Benefits paid

(62,068)

 

(56,679)

 

(47,713)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, end of year

1,638,220

 

1,572,933

 

1,422,993

Changes in the fair value of plan assets over the year are as follows:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

1,113,189

 

1,123,695

 

976,545

Expected return on plan assets

111,307

 

122,630

 

113,544

Actuarial gain or (loss)

18,805

 

28,318

 

47,230

Company's contributions

8,853

 

13,835

 

12,854

Employees' contributions

13,407

 

15,574

 

21,235

Curtailment and partial settlement

-

 

(134,184)

 

-

Benefits paid

(62,068)

 

(56,679)

 

(47,713)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

1,203,493

 

1,113,189

 

1,123,695

The amounts recognized in the income statement are as follows:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current service cost

26,869

 

27,200

 

31,116

Interest cost

158,069

 

152,470

 

155,514

Expected return on plan assets

(111,307)

 

(122,630)

 

(113,544)

(Gain) or loss amortization

-

 

(10,397)

 

-

Curtailment and partial settlement

-

 

(61,377)

 

-

Gain not recognized of curtailment

-

 

(15,266)

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

73,631

 

(30,000)

 

73,086

In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the expenseexpenses related to the defined benefit obligation under Plan G1 was recorded as follows:pension plan amounting to R$56,613,32,522, R$ (24,314)5,412 and R$ 51,5858,026, were recorded incost of sales and services, selling expenses and administrative expenses, R$ 8,928,46,133, R$ (3,547)7,402 and R$ 9,7146,689 in Selling expenses2011 and R$ 8,090,36,936, R$ (2,139)5,388 and R$ 11,7873,250 in Administrative expenses,2010, respectively.

 

Curtailment and partial settlement

 

As of July, 2010, aiming at resolving the deficit related to the Defined Benefit Plan (G1), SABESP and SABESPREV have structured a process through which the participants may elect to movemigrate from the Defined Benefit Plan to a Defined Contribution Plan, the SABESPREV Mais.

 

The migration from plan G1 to SABESPREV Mais resulted in actuarial gain, related to the proportional part of the employees who migrated, determined by the present value of the assets and liabilities of the pension plan. The Company recognized gain related to curtailment and partial settlement of the present value of the defined benefit pension plan and the fair value of the plan assets, amounting to R$ 61,377.61,377 in 2010. The Company also recognized prior actuarial gains amounting to R$ 15,266.

 

The period for the plan migration (from July to November 2010) was suspended through an injunctive relief granted by the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo, on October 20, 2010 untilthe claims from the parties involved are taken into consideration. As of October 20, 2010, 4,023 participants corresponding to 26.0% of the G1 plan migrated to defined contribution plan (Sabesprev Mais).

F-83


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

ExpectedEstimated expenses

20122013

Cost of current service

Current service cost

27,76438,823

Interest cost

176,762206,429

Expected return onincome from plan assets

(151,139)

Participants contribution

(147,550)(10,876)

Total additional expensesexpense to be recognized

56,97683,237

 

The principal actuarial assumptions used were as follows:

Actuarial assumptions:

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate – real

5.75% p.a.

 

6.0% p.a.

 

6.6% p.a.

Discount rate – real (NTN-B)

 

4.10% p.a.

 

5.75% p.a.

 

6.0% p.a.

 

Inflation rate

5.0% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

5.00% p.a.

 

5.00% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

Expected rate of return on assets

12.53% p.a.

 

10.2% p.a.

 

10.8% p.a.

 

9.30% p.a.

 

12.53% p.a.

 

10.2% p.a.

 

Salary growth rate

7.1% p.a.

 

6.1% p.a.

 

6.6% p.a.

Future salary increase

 

7.10% p.a.

 

7.10% p.a.

 

6.1% p.a.

 

Mortality table

 

AT-2000

 

AT-2000

 

AT-83

 

 

Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are set based on mortality table AT-2000 (90% of mortality table AT83 in 2010)AT83). The change did not cause a relevant impact and this table is more adherent to the plan population.

 

The discount rate of 5.75% (6.0% in 2010) is similar to the federal public papers rate (NTN-B).

The number of active participants of G1 as of December 31, 20112012 was 9,833 (December 31, 2010 – 10,444). The number of inactive participants9,283 (9,833 as of December 31, 20112011), and of inactive participants was 5,936 (December6,328 (5,936 as of December 31, 20102011).

F-86


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais5,579).R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

Sensitivity analysis of the pension plan as of December 31, 2012 regarding the changes in the main weighted assumptions are

 

Funded plan - G1

 

Change in expectationassumption

 

Impact on liabilitypresent value of the defined benefit obligations

Funded plan - G1

Discount rate

Increase of 0.5%

 

Decrease of 6.19%6.87%

 

Decrease of 0.5%

 

Increase of 6.87%7.70%

Wage increase rate

 

Salary growth rate

Increase of 0.5%

 

Increase of 2.73%2.83%

 

Decrease of 0.5%

 

Decrease of 2.46%

2.53%

Life expectation

Increase of 1 year

 

Increase of 1.36%

1.73%

 

Plan assets

 

The plan'splan investment policies and strategies are aimedaim at getting consistent returns and reduce the risks associated to reduce investment riskthe utilization of financial assets available on the Capital Markets through diversification, considering factors, such factors as the liquidity needs and funded statusthe long-term nature of the plan liabilities,liability, types and availability of financial instruments in the local market, general economic conditions and forecasts as well as requirements under local pensionthe law. The plan's asset allocation and external asset management strategies are determined with the support of reports and analysis prepared by SABESPREV and independent financial consultants. Under its allocation strategy, pension assets of the Company are comprised as follows:consultants:

 

Segment

 

December 31,

2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

Fixed rate securities

 

67%

 

69%

 

Equity securities

 

16%

 

17%

 

Structured investment

 

14%

 

9%

 

Real estate

 

2%

 

3%

 

Loans

 

1%

 

2%

 

Total

 

100%

 

100%

 

 

 

Allocation - %

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset category

 

December
31, 2011

 

December
31, 2010

 

December
31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate securities

 

69%

 

72%

 

78%

Equity securities

 

26%

 

21%

 

15%

Real estate

 

3%

 

5%

 

5%

Loans

 

2%

 

2%

 

2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

 

Restrictions with respect to asset portfolio investments, in the case of federal government securities for internal management, are as follows:securities:

 

i) papers securitized by the National Treasury will not be permitted;

ii) exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates will not be permitted, i.e., if there are any exchange bills in the portfolio swaps mustand derivatives should only be used to hedge existing exposure.

 

Restrictions with respect to asset portfolio investments, in the case of variable-income securities for external management, are as follows:

 

i) day-trade operations will not be permitted;

ii) sale of uncovered optionsshare is prohibited;

F-87


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

iii) swap operations without guarantee are prohibited;

iv) leverage will not be permitted, i.e., operations with derivatives representing leverage of asset or selling short, are prohibited, such operations cannot result in losses higher than invested amounts.

 

SABESPREV does not investhave in stock or bondsits investment portfolio fixed income securities issued by the Company. The investments in loansCompany as of December 31, 2012 and equity securities are held mainly in investment funds managed by government controlled banks.2011. The real estate held in the portfolio is not used by the Company.

 

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was determined based on the weighted average estimated return of the plan assets, which includes fixed rate securities, equity securities, real estate, and loans, based on information obtained from SABESPREV. This projected long-term rate includes the projected long-term inflation rate and takes into consideration such factors as projected future interest yield curves and economic projections available in the market.

The plan assets had a return of 14.9%16.7% in 2012, 13.7% in 2011 and 13.4% in 2010.2010.  

 

ExpectedThe Company expects contributions by the Company to Plan G1 for the year ending December 31, 2012 is2013 in the amount of R$ 11,018.10,876.

 

SABESPREV's technical deficit as of December 31, 2011 was R$ 506,431 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 437,652). The Company and the SABESPREVSabesprev are in process of negotiation to resolve the technicalactuarial deficit, by changingcontinuing migrating participants from the pension plan from a Defined Benefit Plan to Defined ContributionSabesprev Mais Plan. Management expects not to incur in additional costs resulting fromreduce the actuarial deficit due to the change of the referred plans.

 

(ii)Defined Contribution     Private pension plan (SABESPREV MAIS)benefits – Defined contribution

 

OnAs of December 31, 2011, after the migration of the participants, the Defined Contribution Plan remained with 4,452 participants (4,023 in 2010).2012, Sabesprev Mais plan, based on defined contribution, had 4,569 active and assisted participants.

 

With respect to the defined contribution pensionSabesprev Mais plan, the contributions from the sponsor represent 100% over the total basic contribution from the participants.

 

Regarding the Defined Contribution Plan,Sabesprev Mais plan, the commitment to all participants who migrated up to December 31, 2011,2012, as per the actuarial report, amounted to R$12,441 (R$14,688 relatesin December 2011) referred to all participants which migrated.active participants. The Company has already made payments in the amount of R$7,496 in 2012 (R$10,241 in 2011 (R$and R$13,256 in 2010).

 

(iii)Plan G0

F-85


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated


The Company is also co-obligor to a supplemental defined benefit pension plan. Pursuant to a law enacted by the State Government, certainLaw 4,819/58, employees who provided service to the Companyservices prior to May 1974 and were retired as an employee of the Company acquired a legal right to receive supplemental pension payments, which rights are referred as "Plan G0". The Company pays these supplemental benefits on behalf of the State Government and makes claims for reimbursements from the State Government, which are recorded as accounts receivablereceivables from shareholder,related parties, limited to the amounts considered virtually certain that will be reimbursed by the State Government. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the Company recorded a defined benefit obligation for Plan G0 of R$1,547,161 (R$1,512,078 (December 31, 2010 - R$ 1,316,706)in December 2011).

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, beginning of year

1,581,600

 

1,638,036

 

Service cost

400

 

548

 

Interest cost

167,387

 

161,718

 

Actuarial (gain) losses

(371,035)

 

(94,281)

 

Benefits paid

(132,704)

 

(124,421)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,987,718

 

1,581,600

 

Unrecognized gains (losses)

(440,557)

 

(69,522)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, end of year

1,547,161

 

1,512,078

 

Changes

F-88


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in the present valuethousands of defined benefit obligation over the year are as follows:Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, beginning of year

1,638,036

 

1,295,066

 

1,338,587

Service cost

548

 

9

 

9

Interest cost

161,718

 

135,344

 

136,299

Actuarial (gain) losses

(94,281)

 

326,025

 

(71,837)

Benefits paid

(124,421)

 

(118,408)

 

(107,991)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,581,600

 

1,638,036

 

1,295,067

Unrecognized gains (losses)

(69,522)

 

(321,330)

 

4,694

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation, end of year

1,512,078

 

1,316,706

 

1,299,761

 

The amounts recognized in the statement of income statement are as follows:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current service cost

548

 

9

 

9

Cost of current service

400

 

548

 

9

 

Interest cost

161,718

 

135,344

 

136,299

167,387

 

161,718

 

135,344

 

Amortized (gain) / losses

157,527

 

-

 

 

-

 

157,527

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

319,793

 

135,353

 

136,308

167,787

 

319,793

 

135,353

 

 

In 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, the expense related to the defined benefit obligation under Plan G0 was recorded in administrative expenses.

 

ExpectedEstimated expenses

20122013

 

 

CurrentCost of current service cost

400296

Interest cost

167,387176,470

Total additional expenses to be recognized

167,787176,766

 

The principal actuarial assumptions used were as follows:used:

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate – real

5.75% p.a.

 

6.0% p.a.

 

6.6% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

5.75% p.a.

 

6.0% p.a.

 

Inflation rate

5.0% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

5.0% p.a.

 

5.0% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

Salary growth rate

7.1% p.a.

 

6.1% p.a.

 

6.6% p.a.

Future salary increase

 

7.1% p.a.

 

7.1% p.a.

 

6.1% p.a.

 

Mortality table

 

AT-2000

 

AT-2000

 

AT-83

 

 

Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are set based on mortality table AT-2000 (90% of mortality table AT83 in 2010)AT83). The change did not cause a relevant impact and this table is more adherent to the plan population.

 

The discount rate of 5.75% (6.0% in 2010) is similar to the federal public papers rate (NTN-B).

The number of active participants of G0 planPlan - Go as of December 31, 20112012 was 36 (December27 (36 as of December 31, 2010 - 62)2011). The number of beneficiaries, retirees and survivorsdependents as of December 31, 20112012 was 2,259 (December2,318 (2,259 on December 31, 2010 - 2,474)2011).

F-86

The benefit payable from the Go pension plan expected for 2013 is R$142,267.

The sensitivity analysis of total liabilities of pension plan on December 31, 2012 to the changes in the main weighted assumptions is:

F-89


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Expected benefits to be paid under Plan G0 for the year ending December 31, 2012 is R$ 133,635.

Sensitivity of the pension plan

Change in expectation

Impact on liability

Plan - G0

Discount rate

Increase of 0.5%

Decrease of 4.47%

Decrease of 0.5%

Increase of 4.86%

 

 

 

 

Change in assumption

Impact on present value of the defined benefit obligations

Discount rate

Increase of 0.5%

Decrease of 4.96%

Decrease of 0.5%

Increase of 5.42%

Wages increase rate

Increase of 0.5%

 

Increase of 0.02%0.01%

 

 

Decrease of 0.5%

 

Decrease of 0.02%

0.01%

Life expectation

Increase of 1 year

 

Increase of 1.88%

2.34%

 

(c)        Profit sharing

 

The Company has a profit sharing program in accordance with an agreement with labor union and SABESP.Sabesp. The period covered represents the Company fiscal year, commencewhich starts in January toand ends in December. The limit of the profit sharing is one month salary for each employee, depending on performance goals reached. As of December 31, 20112012 the profit distribution accrued amounted to R$60,479 (R$56,576 (2010 –in 2011 and R$ 52,600)52,600 in 2010).

 

1718        Services payable

The services account records the balances payable, mainly from services received from third parties, such as supply of electric power, reading of hydrometers and delivery of water and sewage bills, cleaning, surveillance and security services, collection, legal counsel services, audit, marketing and advertising and consulting services, among others. This account also records the amounts payable from the percentage in the revenues of São Paulo local government (Note 10 d (v)).

19        Equity

 

(a)Authorized capital

 

The Company is authorized to increase capital by up to R$10,000,000 (R$10,000,000 in December 2011), based on a Board of Directors' resolution, after submission to the Fiscal Council.

 

(b)Subscribed and paid-in capital

 

Subscribed and paid-in capital is represented by 227,836,623 registered, book-entry common shares as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, without par value, held as follows:

 

Before Stock Split on April 22, 2013         

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Number of shares

 

%

 

Number of shares

 

%

São Paulo State Department of Finance

114,508,086

 

50.26%

 

114,508,086

 

50.26%

Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia

57,523,374

 

25.25%

 

52,990,545

 

23.26%

The Bank Of New York ADR Department (equivalent in shares) (*)

55,602,286

 

24.40%

 

60,144,856

 

26.40%

Other

202,877

 

0.09%

 

193,136

 

0.08%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

227,836,623

 

100.0%

 

227,836,623

 

100.0%

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of shares

 

%

 

Number of shares

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State Department of Finance

114,508,086

 

50.26%

 

114,508,085

 

50.26%

Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia

52,990,545

 

23.26%

 

51,707,376

 

22.69%

The Bank Of New York ADR Department (equivalent
in shares) (*)

60,144,856

 

26.40%

 

61,418,144

 

26.96%

Other

193,136

 

0.08%

 

203,018

 

0.09%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

227,836,623

 

100.0%

 

227,836,623

 

100.0%

F-90


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

After Stock Split on April 22, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Number of shares

 

%

 

Number of shares

 

%

São Paulo State Department of Finance

343,524,258

 

50.26%

 

343,524,258

 

50.26%

Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia

172,570,122

 

25.25%

 

158,971,635

 

23.26%

The Bank Of New York ADR Department (equivalent in shares) (*)

166,806,858

 

24.40%

 

180,434,568

 

26.40%

Other

608,631

 

0.09%

 

579,408

 

0.08%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

683,509,869

 

100.0%

 

683,509,869

 

100.0%

 

(*)       Each ADR corresponds to 2 shares. As of January 24, 2013, each ADR is equalcorresponds to 2 shares1 share. See Note 29(v)

 

The quantity ofSubscribed and paid-in capital was represented by 227,836,623 registered, book-entry common shares, without par value as of January 1, 20112012 and as of December 31, 2011 were 227,836,623 registered common shares, without par value. There2012; there was no change during the year.

 

On April 22, 2013 the Shareholders approved the stock split in the annual Shareholders’ meeting. The stock split was in a portion of 1 (one) to 3 (three) and the total common shares became 683,509,869. The owner of one share will receive 2 (two) more shares.

As required by IAS 33, the Company adjusted retrospectively the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share and per ADS for the period presented.

(c)Distribution of earnings Dividends

 

Shareholders are entitled to a minimum mandatory dividend of 25% of the adjusted net income under Brazilian GAAP, calculated according to the Brazilian corporate law.Corporate Law. The dividends do not bear interest and the amounts not claimed within three years from the date of the Shareholders' Meeting that approved them mature in favor of the Company.

 

The mandatory minimum dividends are calculated as follows:

F-87F-91


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

1,911,900

 

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

(-) Legal reserve - 5%

(95,595)

 

(61,171)

 

(81,522)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,816,305

 

1,162,248

 

1,548,925

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum mandatory dividend - 25% (R$0.66, R$ 0.43 and R$ 0.57 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, per share and per ADS)

454,076

 

290,562

 

387,231

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income of the year

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

1,507,747

Adjustments to old Brazilian GAAP

-

 

-

 

(133,868)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income according to Brazilian GAAP

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

1,373,879

(-) Legal reserve - 5%

(61,171)

 

(81,522)

 

(68,694)

(-) Donations

-

 

-

 

(12,994)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,162,248

 

1,548,925

 

1,292,191

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mandatory minimum dividend - 25%

290,562

 

387,231

 

323,048

 

On April 28, 2011,23, 2012, the general shareholders meetingShareholders’ General Meeting approved the distribution of dividends as interest on shareholders’ equity amounting to R$ 455,992, which578,705, for the 2011 fiscal year. Therefore, the amount of R$288,143 related to the surplus minimum mandatory dividends of 25%, set forth in the Bylaws, recorded in the 2011 equity under “Additional proposed dividends” was attributedtransferred to dividend in 2010. The additional proposed dividend of 2010, amounting to R$ 68,761 (which exceeded the minimum in 2010) wascurrent liabilities, and these amounts were paid in June 2011.2012. The R$578,705 interest on shareholders’ equity, amounting toR$455,992, net of the withholding income taxes of R$33,032, totaled R$422,960.

In 2011, the Company accrued interest on shareholders' equity in the amount of R$ 578,705 (2010 - R$ 455,992) of which R$ 535,537 (2010 – R$ 422,960) was attributed to dividends, net of withholding income tax of R$40,882, totaled R$537,823.

The Company proposed dividends as interest on shareholders’equity in the amount of R$ 43,168 (2010 -534,277 corresponding to R$ 33,032). Interest2.345 per common share.  This interest on shareholders'shareholders’ equity, was calculated in conformity with Article 9net of Law 9249/95, atincome tax of R$39,863, totaled R$494,414 to be approved on the Long-term Interest Rate (TJLP) and recorded as dividends.Shareholders’ Meeting to be held on April 22, 2013.

 

The Company declared dividends payable as interest on shareholders’ equity in the amount of R$ 578,705 to be approved at the general shareholders meeting on April 23, 2012. The Company recorded dividends payable in the amount of R$ 290,562,454,076, which considers the minimum dividend amount established byset forth in the articlesBylaws. The amount exceeding the minimum mandatory dividend due in the year of association. The difference of R$288,14380,201, was reclassified in the shareholders’ equity into the caption “Additional proposed dividends”. account.

The balance payable as of December 31, 2012 was R$414,355, net of withholding income tax.

 

(d)Capital reserve

 

Capital reserves are comprised ofThe capital reserve includes tax incentives and donations received by the company and may only be used for future capital increases.

 

(e)Legal reserve

 

ThisEarnings reserve - legal reserve is formed by allocatinga requirement for all Brazilian corporations and represents accrual of 5% of annual statutory profits until the aggregate amount of the reserve equalsnet income determined based on Brazilian law, up to 20% of our capital stock.capital. However, the Company is not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a year in which the legal reserve, when added to ourthe other established capital and earnings reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital stock. The amounts allocated to such reserve may only be used to increase ourthe capital stock or to offset losses. Therefore, they are not available for the payment of dividends.

 

(f)Investments reserve

 

This is created by allocation of statutory profits in order to fund the expansion of the water supply and sewage treatment systems.

According to Brazilian Law 6404/76, a portion of the net profit of the year can be reserved for investment, which amount is based on a budget presented by the management and previously approved by shareholders’ meeting. The article of association does not mention about the necessity of approval of the budget in the shareholders’ meeting, however the Company adopts the rules regarding the Law 6404/76. After concluding the investments, the investmentEarnings reserve will be transferred to capital stock or to retained earnings, in part on in a whole, only after the approval of the shareholders. According to Law 6404/76, if a project, which was reserved for investment, takes more than one year to be finished, the budget related to such project must be approved annually in the shareholders’ meeting, until the conclusion of the project.

F-88


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands of reais, unless otherwise indicated

According to article 29 paragraph fourth of the article of association, the Board of Directors can propose in a general meeting that the residual profit of the year, after deducting the legal reserve and the minimum dividend, can be reserved for investments which will have the following rules:

I – the amount, add-up by the others earning reserves, may not be higher than the capital stock;

II – the reserve is used to guarantee the investment plan to be used;

a)to absorb losses, when necessary;

b)to distribute dividends at any time;

c)to rescue, reimburse or acquire stocks, authorized by law;

d)to increase capital stock.

The investments reserve is specifically formed by the portion corresponding to own funds assigned to the expansion of the water supply and sewage treatment systems, based on thecapital budget approved by the fiscal counsel. Management.

F-92


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, thisthe balance of investment reserve was recognized, pursuant to article 196 of Law 6404/76, in the total amount oftotaled R$ 3,408,5914,690,619 and R$ 2,825,048,3,408,591, respectively.

 

Pursuant to Paragraph four of Article 29 of the by-laws, the Board of Directors may propose to the Shareholders’ Meeting that the remaining balance of net income for the year, after deducting the legal reserve and minimum mandatory dividends, be allocated to an investment reserve that will comply with the following criteria:

I-          its balance, jointly with the balance of the other profit reserves, except for reserves for contingencies and realizable profits, may not exceed the capital stock;           

II-the reserve is intended to guarantee the investment plan and its balance may be used:

a) to absorb losses, whenever necessary;

b) to distribute dividends, at any moment;

c) in share redemption, reimbursement or purchase transactions authorized by             law; 

d) to increase capital stock.

 

(g)      DestinationAllocation of profit offor the year

 

20112012

(+)

Net profitincome for the year

1,223,4191,911,900

(-)

Legal reserve – 5%

61,17195,595

(-)

Mandatory minimun dividendMinimum mandatory dividends

290,562454,076

(-)

Additional dividendproposed dividends

288,14380,201

Investment reserve recorded in 2012

583,543

1,282,028

(h)      Retained earnings (losses)(accumulated losses)

 

TheRetained earnings (accumulated losses): the statutory balance of this account is zero as all retained earnings must be distributed or allocated to an earnings reserve at year end.

 

1820       Earnings Perper Share

 

Basic and diluted

 

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the income attributable to the Company'sCompany’s shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the year.

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attributable income to the Company's shareholders

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

1,507,747

Weighted average number of common shares issued (in shares)

227,836,623

 

227,836,623

 

227,836,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share (reais per share)

5.370

 

7.156

 

6.618

The Company does not have potentially dilutive common shares outstanding or debts convertible into common shares. Accordingly, basic and diluted earnings per share are equal.

 

19Operating Segments

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income attributable to the Company’s shareholders

1,911,900

 

1,223,419

 

1,630,447

 

Weighted average number of common shares issued(*)

683,509,869

 

683,509,869

 

683,509,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share (reais per share)

2.80

 

1.79

 

2.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per ADS (reais per ADS)

2.80

 

1.79

 

2.39

 

 

Management has determined the operating segments based on the reports that the Executive Board reviews and uses to make strategic decisions to determine the allocation of resources and evaluate the segments development.

The Executive Board considers the business from a rendering of services perspective (water supply and sewage services). No operating segment has been aggregated.

The segment information for the reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

F-93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements (**)

Total per Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from sales and services - from

external customers

 

4,610,204

 

3,699,916

 

2,234,778

 

10,544,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross sales deductions

 

(334,616)

 

(268,645)

 

-

 

(603,261)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services - from external

Customers

 

4,275,588

 

3,431,271

 

2,234,778

 

9,941,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs, selling and administrative expenses

 

(3,309,145)

 

(2,001,647)

 

(2,186,320)

 

(7,497,112)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before other operating

expenses, net

 

966,443

 

1,429,624

 

48,458

 

2,444,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(90,138)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before financial income

(expenses) and income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,354,387

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

415,065

 

353,704

 

-

 

768,769



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

(*)On January 10, 2013, the board of directors approved the change in the number of American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), negotiated in the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), from actual 1 ADR to 2 shares to 1 ADR to 1 share. As required by IAS 33, the Company adjusted retrospectively the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share and per ADS for the periods presented.

 

21        Segment information

 

The segment information forManagement, comprised by the reportableBoard of Directors and the Board of Executive Officers, has determined the operating segments for the year ended December 31, 2010 isused to make strategic decisions, as follows:water supply and sewage services.

(i)    Income statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 (*)

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements

 

Balance as per financial statements

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements (**)

 

Total per Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from sales and services - from

external customers

 

4,257,158

 

3,398,733

 

2,130,684

 

9,786,575

Gross operating revenue - from external customers

 

4,947,860

 

3,986,838

 

2,474,612

 

11,409,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross sales deductions

 

(314,282)

 

(241,266)

 

-

 

(555,548)

 

(362,259)

 

(292,616)

 

-

 

(654,875)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services - from external

Customers

 

3,942,876

 

3,157,467

 

2,130,684

 

9,231,027

Net operating revenue - from external customers

 

4,585,601

 

3,694,222

 

2,474,612

 

10,754,435

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs, selling and administrative expenses

 

(2,789,529)

 

(1,690,084)

 

(2,081,081)

 

(6,560,694)

 

(3,414,352)

 

(2,051,250)

 

(2,423,797)

 

(7,889,400)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before other operating

expenses, net

 

1,153,347

 

1,467,383

 

49,603

 

2,670,333

 

1,171,249

 

1,642,972

 

50,815

 

2,865,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,775)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before financial income

(expenses) and income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,672,163

Financial result, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(301,356)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,543,904

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

291,841

 

260,343

 

-

 

552,184

 

404,803

 

335,344

 

-

 

740,147

 

 

F-94

The segment information for the reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009 (*)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements (**)

 

Total per Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from sales and services - from

external customers

 

4,104,332

 

3,131,886

 

1,848,972

 

9,085,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross sales deductions

 

(286,813)

 

(218,858)

 

-

 

(505,671)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services - from external

Customers

 

3,817,519

 

2,913,028

 

1,848,972

 

8,579,519

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs, selling and administrative expenses

 

(3,015,724)

 

(1,533,549)

 

(1,865,503)

 

(6,414,776)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before other operating

expenses, net

 

801,795

 

1,379,479

 

 

(16,531)

 

2,164,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(44,425)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before financial income

(expenses) and income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,120,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

301,990

 

258,699

 

1,547

 

562,236



Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements

 

Balance as per financial statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross operating revenue - from external customers

 

4,610,204

 

3,699,916

 

2,234,778

 

10,544,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross sales deductions

 

(334,616)

 

(268,645)

 

-

 

(603,261)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating revenue - from external

customers

 

4,275,588

 

3,431,271

 

2,234,778

 

9,941,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs, selling and administrative expenses

 

(3,309,145)

 

(2,001,647)

 

(2,186,320)

 

(7,497,112)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before other operating

expenses, net

 

966,443

 

1,429,624

 

48,458

 

2,444,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(90,138)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial result, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(633,641)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,720,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

415,065

 

353,704

 

-

 

768,769

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water

 

Sewage

 

Reconciliation to the financial statements (**

)

Total per Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross operating revenue - from external customers

 

4,257,158

 

3,398,733

 

2,130,684

 

9,786,575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross sales deductions

 

(314,282)

 

(241,266)

 

-

 

(555,548)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating revenue - from external customers

 

3,942,876

 

3,157,467

 

2,130,684

 

9,231,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs, selling and administrative expenses

 

(2,789,529)

 

(1,690,084)

 

(2,081,081)

 

(6,560,694)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before other operating expenses, net

 

1,153,347

 

1,467,383

 

49,603

 

2,670,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial result, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(379,407)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,292,756

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

291,841

 

260,343

 

-

 

552,184

F-95


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

Explanation on the reconciliation items for the Financial Statements: the impacts on gross revenues from sales and services and in costs are as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from construction recognized under IFRIC 12

(a)

2,474,612

 

2,234,778

 

2,130,684

 

Construction costs recognized under IFRIC 12

(a)

(2,423,797)

 

(2,186,320)

 

(2,081,081)

 

Construction margin

 

50,815

 

48,458

 

49,603

 

 

(*) Part of the amount presented as reconciliation in 2010 was reclassified as water and sewage to better compare the operating segment of 2011. In 2009 the reclassification was not performed due to a lack of information available.

(**)        Adjustments details

Adjustments are comprised of:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from construction recognized under IFRIC 12

(a)

2,234,778

 

2,130,684

 

2,039,809

Construction costs recognized under IFRIC 12

(a)

(2,186,320)

 

(2,081,081)

 

(2,009,664)

 

 

 

48,458

 

49,603

 

30,145

(a)Revenue from concession construction contracts is recognized in accordance with IAS 11 Construction Contracts, using the percentage-of-completion method. Revenue from cost-plus contracts is recognized by reference to the construction costs incurred during the period plus a fee earned. In the operating report, construction costs are recognized as property, plantmethod. See Notes 2.5 (b) and equipment, as it was presented in accordance with old Brazilian GAAP.2.10 (a).

(ii)   Intangible assets

 

Reportable segment'ssegment’s intangible assets are reconciled to total assets as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Intangible asset:

 

 

 

 

Water supply

9,138,295

 

8,237,071

 

Sewage services

11,211,925

 

10,584,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment assets for reportable segments

20,350,220

 

18,821,473

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other intangible assets

1,641,702

 

1,320,204

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

21,991,922

 

20,141,677

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Water supply

8,237,071

 

7,980,302

Sewage services

10,584,402

 

9,145,194

 

 

 

 

Segment assets for reportable segments

18,821,473

 

17,125,496

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

3,725,833

 

3,590,121

Noncurrent assets

 

 

 

Customer accounts receivable, net

333,713

 

352,839

Accounts receivable from related party, net

170,288

 

231,076

Indemnities receivable

60,295

 

146,213

Escrow deposits

54,178

 

43,543

Deferred income taxes

179,463

 

78,440

Property, plant and equipment, net

356,468

 

249,606

Other noncurrent assets

1,513,273

 

1,533,250

 

 

 

 

Total assets per the balance sheet

25,214,984

 

23,350,584

 

There are no liabilities allocated to the reportable segments.

 

20Net22       Revenue from Sales and Servicesper Region

 

The(a) Net operating revenue comprises the following:revenue:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Revenue by region

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metropolitan region of São Paulo

6,625,041

 

6,144,669

 

5,699,618

 

Regional Systems (i)

2,309,657

 

2,165,451

 

1,956,273

 

Gross revenue from construction

2,474,612

 

2,234,778

 

2,130,684

 

Service taxes and deductions

(654,875)

 

(603,261)

 

(555,548)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Net operating revenue (ii)

10,754,435

 

9,941,637

 

9,231,027

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

Gross revenue by region

 

 

 

 

 

Greater São Paulo Metropolitan area

6,144,669

 

5,699,618

 

5,280,758

Regional Systems (i)

2,165,451

 

1,956,273

 

1,764,623

Gross revenue from construction

2,234,778

 

2,130,684

 

2,039,809

Service taxes and deductions

(603,261)

 

(555,548)

 

(505,671)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

9,941,637

 

9,231,027

 

8,579,519


 

F-96


Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(i)  ComprisesIncluding the municipalities operated in the countrysideinland and at the coast of the State of São Paulo State.Paulo.

(ii) Net operating revenue increased by 8.2% as of December 31, 2012 over 2011. The volume billed was up 2.7% as of December 31, 2012 and the tariff adjustment has been 5.15% since September 2012 and 6.83% since September 2011. Net operating revenue increased 7.7% as of December 31, 2011 over 2010. The volume billed was up 3.1% as of December 31, 2011 and the tariff adjustment has been 6.83% since September 2011 and 4.1% since September 2010.

(b) Reconciliation between gross revenue and net revenue:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenue from sales and/or services

 

8,934,698

 

8,310,120

 

7,655,891

Construction revenue (Note 10 c)

 

2,474,612

 

2,234,778

 

2,130,684

Sales tax

 

(654,875)

 

(603,261)

 

(555,548)

Net revenues

 

10,754,435

 

9,941,637

 

9,231,027

 

2123       Operating Costs and Expenses

 

The operating costs and expenses are composed of the following:

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales and services

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

1,225,452

 

1,132,403

 

994,631

Pension obligations (i)

36,480

 

49,374

 

(11,799)

Construction costs(Note 10 c)

2,423,797

 

2,186,320

 

2,081,081

General supplies

169,389

 

147,464

 

135,113

Treatment supplies

177,965

 

154,867

 

136,546

Outsourced services

725,471

 

668,994

 

603,924

Electricity

589,512

 

583,418

 

529,480

General expenses

400,719

 

369,054

 

202,645

Depreciation and amortization

716,613

 

739,083

 

522,927

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,465,398

 

6,030,977

 

5,194,548

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

198,959

 

194,832

 

185,012

Pension obligations (i)

6,054

 

7,942

 

(1,375)

General supplies

8,327

 

7,703

 

6,488

Outsourced services

205,568

 

201,955

 

216,038

Electricity

629

 

622

 

775

General expenses

78,021

 

78,660

 

69,581

Depreciation and amortization

8,021

 

7,435

 

3,922

Allowance for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries (Note 7(c))

192,295

 

120,393

 

232,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

697,874

 

619,542

 

712,946

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales and services

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

1,132,403

 

994,631

 

1,124,655

Pension plan

49,374

 

(11,799)

 

54,948

Construction costs

2,186,320

 

2,081,081

 

2,009,664

General supplies

147,464

 

135,113

 

142,154

Treatment supplies

154,867

 

136,546

 

136,722

Outsourced services

668,994

 

603,924

 

552,708

Electricity

583,418

 

529,480

 

483,675

General expenses

369,054

 

202,645

 

45,099

Depreciation and amortization

739,083

 

522,927

 

537,629

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,030,977

 

5,194,548

 

5,087,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

194,832

 

185,012

 

202,090

Pension plan

7,942

 

(1,375)

 

9,714

General supplies

7,703

 

6,488

 

7,600

Outsourced services

201,955

 

216,038

 

204,235

Electricity

622

 

775

 

739

General expenses

78,660

 

69,581

 

63,474

Depreciation and amortization

7,435

 

3,922

 

5,219

Allowance for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries

120,393

 

232,505

 

117,351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

619,542

 

712,946

 

610,422

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

160,262

 

141,749

 

155,719

Pension plan

262,597

 

93,683

 

56,409

General supplies

4,267

 

5,167

 

6,211

Outsourced services

125,502

 

150,300

 

154,341

Electricity

1,052

 

1,268

 

1,043

General expenses

208,978

 

172,241

 

268,971

Depreciation and amortization

22,251

 

25,335

 

19,388

Tax expenses

61,684

 

63,457

 

55,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

846,593

 

653,200

 

717,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost, Sales and Administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

1,487,497

 

1,321,392

 

1,482,464

Pension plan

319,913

 

80,509

 

121,071

Construction costs

2,186,320

 

2,081,081

 

2,009,664

General supplies

159,434

 

146,768

 

155,965

Treatment supplies

154,867

 

136,546

 

136,722

Outsourced services

996,451

 

970,262

 

911,284

Electricity

585,092

 

531,523

 

485,457

General expenses

656,692

 

444,467

 

377,544

Depreciation and amortization

768,769

 

552,184

 

562,236

Tax expenses

61,684

 

63,457

 

55,018

Allowance for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries

120,393

 

232,505

 

117,351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,497,112

 

6,560,694

 

6,414,776

F-92F-97


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

171,927

 

160,262

 

141,749

Pension obligations (i)

104,717

 

262,597

 

93,683

General supplies

5,244

 

4,267

 

5,167

Outsourced services

148,405

 

125,502

 

150,300

Electricity

1,492

 

1,052

 

1,268

General expenses

209,765

 

208,978

 

172,241

Depreciation and amortization

15,513

 

22,251

 

25,335

Tax expenses

69,065

 

61,684

 

63,457

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

726,128

 

846,593

 

653,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost, Sales and Administrative expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and payroll charges

1,596,338

 

1,487,497

 

1,321,392

Pension obligations (i)

147,251

 

319,913

 

80,509

Construction costs (Note 10 c)

2,423,797

 

2,186,320

 

2,081,081

General supplies

182,960

 

159,434

 

146,768

Treatment supplies

177,965

 

154,867

 

136,546

Outsourced services

1,079,444

 

996,451

 

970,262

Electricity

591,633

 

585,092

 

531,523

General expenses

688,505

 

656,692

 

444,467

Depreciation and amortization

740,147

 

768,769

 

552,184

Tax expenses

69,065

 

61,684

 

63,457

Allowance for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries (Note 7(c))

192,295

 

120,393

 

232,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,889,400

 

7,497,112

 

6,560,694

(i) The decrease in pension obligations is due to an increase in actuarial liabilities referring to additional retirement and pension benefits granted by State Law 4819/58 (Plan G0), in the amount of R$157,527, which impacted the first quarter of 2011.

24       Financial income and expenses

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and charges on loans and financing – local currency

(306,794)

 

(355,526)

 

(388,502)

Interest and charges on loans and financing – foreign currency

(87,800)

 

(79,816)

 

(50,797)

Other financial expenses

(36,394)

 

(21,743)

 

(56,551)

Income tax on international remittances

(11,660)

 

(9,795)

 

(3,412)

Inflation adjustment on loans and financing (i)

(34,599)

 

(48,878)

 

(87,330)

Inflation adjustment on Sabesprev Mais deficit(ii)

(1,525)

 

(1,794)

 

-

Other inflation adjustments (iii)

(6,657)

 

(41,449)

 

(1,248)

Interest and inflation adjustments on provisions

(97,393)

 

(143,765)

 

(201,627)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Financial expenses

(582,822)

 

(702,766)

 

(789,467)

F-98


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Financial income

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation adjustment gains (iv)

66,514

 

89,361

 

120,779

Income on short-term investments

163,421

 

271,973

 

137,720

Interest and other income

102,106

 

104,592

 

85,415

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Financial income

332,041

 

465,926

 

343,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial, net before exchange rate changes

(250,781)

 

(236,840)

 

(445,553)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange result, net

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange rate changes on loans and financing

(50,523)

 

(382,304)

 

66,191

Other exchange rate changes

(56)

 

(97)

 

(214)

Exchange gains

4

 

(14,400)

 

169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(50,575)

 

(396,801)

 

66,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses), net

(301,356)

 

(633,641)

 

(379,407)

22(i)Financial ExpensesThis inflation adjustment derives from changes in the indexes defined in loan agreements, such as, UPR, IPCA, CDI and IncomeTJLP, corresponding to 0.3%, 5.8%, 6.9% and 5.5%, respectively, in 2012 (1.2%, 6.5%, 10.9% and 6.0%, respectively, in 2011 and 0.7%, 5.9%, 10.6% and 6.0%, respectively, in 2010). The exposures to these rates are shown in Note 3.1.

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and others charges on loans and financing - local currency

(355,526)

 

(388,502)

 

(328,280)

Interest and others charges on loans and financing -
foreign currency

(79,816)

 

(50,797)

 

(61,852)

Other financial expenses (*)

(81,675)

 

(168,462)

 

(95,031)

Income tax over international remittance

(9,795)

 

(3,412)

 

(3,552)

Inflation adjustment on loans and financing

(48,878)

 

(87,330)

 

(1,356)

Inflation adjustment on pension plan incentive (SABESPREVMAIS)

(1,794)

 

-

 

-

Other inflation adjustments

(68,975)

 

(47,041)

 

(22,481)

Inflation adjustment on provisions

(56,307)

 

(43,923)

 

(252,645)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Financial expenses

(702,766)

 

(789,467)

 

(765,197)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial income

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation adjustment gains

89,361

 

120,779

 

62,964

Income on short-term investments

271,973

 

137,720

 

74,220

Interest and other income

104,592

 

85,415

 

89,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Financial income

465,926

 

343,914

 

226,782

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial expenses, net

(236,840)

 

(445,553)

 

(538,415)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange result, net

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange variation on loans and financing

(382,304)

 

66,191

 

536,774

Other foreign exchange variations

(97)

 

(214)

 

(1,028)

Other foreign exchange variations

(14,400)

 

169

 

(7,297)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(396,801)

 

66,146

 

528,449

(ii)This inflation adjustment derives from the change in the National Consumer Price Index (INPC) rate of 6.2% in 2012 (6.1% in 2011 and 6.5% in 2010), which is used to adjust the balance of SABESP’s commitment in relation to the deficit of the Sabesprev Mais pension plan.

(*)

(iii)Other financial expenses are mainly comprised of interest paid related to lawsuitinflation adjustment mainly arises from the adjustment of liabilities referring to investment commitments required by the public-private partnerships and interest related to liabilitiesmainly from program contracts indexed by the IPC and IPCA of 5.7% and 5.8% in 2012, 6.4% and 6.5% in 2011 and 6.2% and 5.9% in 2010, respectively.

(iv)These inflation adjustment mainly arises from the changes in the adjustment indexes of overdue trade receivables which can be IPCA (5.8% in 2012, 6.5% in 2011 and 5.9% in 2010) or IPC-Fipe (Consumer Price Index, 5.1% in 2012, 5.8% in 2011 and 6.4% in 2010), depending on the contract programs.date, and escrow deposits, which are adjusted by the index defined by the Judiciary Branch, which varied between 6.0% in 2012 and 6.2% in 2011.

 

2325       Other Operating Expenses, Netoperating income (expenses), net

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating income

71,764

 

72,501

 

39,456

 

Other operating expenses (i)

(91,539)

 

(162,639)

 

(37,626)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating income (expenses), net

(19,775)

 

(90,138)

 

1,830

 

The breakdown

F-99


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of other operating expenses, net is as follows:

Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other net operating income

72,501

 

39,456

 

45,473

Other operating expenses

(162,639)

 

(37,626)

 

(89,898)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other operating income (expenses), net

(90,138)

 

1,830

 

(44,425)

 

Other operating income is comprised of sale of property, plant and equipment, sale of contracts awarded in public bids, and indemnities and reimbursement of expenses, fines and collaterals, property leases, reuse water, PURA and Aqualog projects and services.

 

Other operating expenses consist mainly of write-off of property, plant and equipment due to obsolescence, discontinued construction works, unproductive wells, projects considered economically unfeasible, losses on property, plant and equipment and expenses provision relatedequipment.

(i) mainly refers to the indemnityallowance for losses of assetsthe municipality of Maua (R$85,918).Diadema in 2012, totaling R$60.295, and the municipality of Mauá in 2011, totaling R$85,918.

26       Commitments

The Company has agreements to manage and maintain its activities, as well as agreements to build new projects aiming at achieving the objectives proposed in its target plan. Below are the main committed amounts as of December 31, 2012:

 

1 year

1-3 year

3-5 year

More than

5 years

Total

Contractual obligations - Expenses

1,145,001

912,264

37,078

996

2,095,339

Contractual obligations – Investments

1,258,344

746,046

25,811

-

2,030,201

Total

2,403,345

1,658,310

62,889

996

4,125,540

27       Additional cash flow information

Non-cash transactions:

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest capitalized

 

296,671

 

261,900

 

228,899

Contractors

 

67,631

 

33,937

 

14,365

Program contract commitments

 

75,434

 

43,325

 

62,748

Leases

 

166,166

 

49,609

 

-

Construction margin

 

50,815

 

47,589

 

49,603

28       Events after the reporting period 

(i)       Debentures

17th issue of Debentures    

F-100



 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated

)

24 Commitments 

(i)          Operating leases

As of December 31, 2011, operating leases already contracted require the following minimum payments, as follows:

2012

63,314

2013

54,067

2014

25,119

2015

867

 

 

Total

143,367

Lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were R$ 34,337, R$ 29,002 and R$ 22,270, respectively. Lease expenses refer to the following: property rentals, vehicle rentals, machinery and equipment leases, IT equipment leases, and photocopiers leases. The leasing contracts will mature in 2015.

(ii)        Electricity

The Company has entered into long-term contracts with electric power providers. As of December 31, 2011, the main amounts regarding this type of contracts are presented as follows:

2012

283,183

2013

88,102

2014

82,583

2015

80,564

 

Total

534,432

Electric power expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were R$ 584,373, R$ 531,661 and R$ 485,766, respectively. The contract will mature in 2015.

25Subsequent event

15thissue of debentures

 

On February 16, 2012,25, 26 and 27, 2013, the Company registered, respectively, the 131st, 2nd and 3rd series of the 17th issue of simplenonconvertible unsecured debentures, nonconvertible, in twothree series withfor public distribution and strict effortsoffering, according to Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM), instruction nº 476. Instruction 400, with the following characteristics:

Issue date: FebruaryJanuary 15, 20122013

Series: TwoThree

Total amount: R$ 771,0801,000,000,000.00 (one billion reais)

Quantity: 77,108100,000 (one hundred thousand)

UnitaryUnit amount: R$ 1010,000.00 (ten thousand reais)

 

Series 1stSerie

Total amount:Amount: R$ 287,330424,680,000.00 (four hundred twenty four million, six hundred eighty thousand reais)

Quantity: 28,73342,468 (forty-two thousand, four hundred and sixty-eight)

Payment: semi-annually

Maturity date:  FebruaryAmortization: 3 annual installments – January 15, 2016 (33%), 2017 (33%) and 2018 (balance)

Repayment:       from 24th month then onEarly redemption: none

Interest: DI + 0.99%plus 0.75% p.a.

 

Series 2

Amount: R$395,230,000.00 (three hundred ninety-five million two hundred and thirty thousand reais)

Quantity: 39,523 (thirty-nine thousand, five hundred and twenty-three)

Payment: annually

Amortization: 2 annual installments – January 15, 2019 and 2020

Early redemption: none

Interest: IPCA plus 4.50% p.a.

Series 3

Amount: R$180,090,000.00 (one hundred eighty million, ninety thousand reais)

Quantity: 18,009 (eighteen thousand and nine)

Payment: annual

Amortization: 3 annual installments – January 15, 2021 (33%), 2022 (33%) and 2023 (balance)

Early redemption: none

Interest: IPCA plus 4.75% p.a.

The proceeds from the issue of debentures will be exclusively used as follows: (i) five hundred million reais (R$500,000,000.00) to repay financial commitments falling due in 2013; and (ii) five hundred million reais (R$500,000,000.00) for the early redemption of debentures or other Company’s debt.

There is no estimate of optional early redemption.

11ndthSerie issue of Debentures  

On March 1, 2013, the Company fully redeemed the balance of series 1 of the 11th issue of debentures, in the amount of R$1,060,428.

F-94

(ii)     BNDES - Tietê Project Phase II

F-101


 

Companhia de Saneamento Básico

do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsYears Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

Loan Agreement 01.2.619.3.1 and Onlending Agreement no 10/669.748-6 signed on August 4, 2002, which had the financial settlement of all obligations deriving from loan and onlending agreements in force, considering that the last installment of interest and amortization was paid on February 15, 2013.

(iii)    BNDES - Tietê Project Phase III.

In February 2013, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – SABESP obtained a loan with the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES), referring to the project to execute the Third Stage of the Tietê River Depollution Program, financed by the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). The amount contracted is R$1,350 million and aims at implementing collectors, interceptors, collection networks and residential sewer connections, and expand the sewage treatment capacity in the metropolitan region of São Paulo. The agreement is effective for 180 months, with a 36-month grace period and finance charges of TJLP + 1.66% p.a.

(iv)     PPP – São Lourenço Production System

On February 7, 2013, the Company started the bidding process of Sabesp International Bidding CSS 16.402/2012 – Public-Private Partnership, by means of Administrative Concession, for the rendering of operation and maintenance services of São Lourenço Production System.

(v)      Change in the number of shares – ADRs

The Company’s Board of Directors, in a meeting held on January 10, 2013, approved (i) the change in the number of shares backing the Company’s American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), traded on the U.S. market at the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) from current ratio of one (1) ADR to two (2) common shares to the new ratio of one (1) ADR to one (1) common share issued by the Company, mainly to promote the liquidity of these instruments; and (ii) the proposal for the stock split of common shares issued by SABESP, in ratio to be still defined by the Management, which will be appropriately submitted to the analysis of SABESP’s shareholders at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting and once approved, shall result in the amendment to Article 3 of SABESP’s Bylaws, as the number of shares representing the Company’s capital stock will be changed according to the ratio to be defined.

(vi)     Allocation of profit

As of April 22, 2013 the Shareholders approved the allocation of profit of 2012 proposed by the board of Directors, as described in the Note 19 (g), in the annual Shareholders’ meeting. Therefore, the Company’s proposed additional dividends amounting to R$ 80,201 were declared on April 22, 2013.

F-102


Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

 

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwiseindicated)

 

(vii)   Stock split

Total amount: R$ 483,750

Quantity: 48,375

Payment: Annually

Maturity date:  February 15, 2019

Repayment:       not applicable

Interest:              IPCA + 6.20% p.a.

 

The amount obtainedAs of April 22, 2013 the Shareholders approved the stock split in the 15th issueannual Shareholders’ meeting. The stock split was in a portion of debentures1 (one) to 3 (three) and the total common shares became 683,509,869. The owner of one share will be utilized to pay the liabilities of the Company until December 31, 2012.receive 2 (two) more shares.

 

 

13th(viii) Tariff

According to the ARSESP Deliberation 406 and article 28 of the Tariff Regulations System, approved by the State decree 41,446 on December 16, 1996, the Board of Directors approved the application of the tariff increase at 2.3509% in the actual tariffs.

The Regulation and Fiscalization fees of 0.5%, authorized by Deliberation 406, will be applied after concluding the operational adjustments to inform the fees in the invoices.

On Abril 4, 2013 the Company filed Reconsideration of Decision at ARSESP, related to the terms in Deliberation 406 to preserve the Company’s interests in the tariff revision process.

The ARSESP approved the Deliberation 413, suspendind the Deliberation 407, postponing the repass of the municipalities charges, established in the Program Agreements and Services Contract,  in the tariffs to the moment of the definitive result of the tariffs revision.

issue of debentures(ix)    EMAE

 

OnWith respect to the matter mentioned in note 8(b), in February 17, 2012,the decision to submit to arbitration was established by the judge during the first hearing, which is subject to appeal. The Company fully repaidfiled a request for suspension which was rejected. In 2013 EMAE filed and arbitration process. SABESP will take all the 13th issue of debentures amountingavailable judicial actions to R$ 633,343.defend its position. The Company’s management assessed this risk as possible loss, and it is not possible to estimate the total amount since it was not defined in the process.

 

 

Japan International Cooperation Agency -(x)      Program contractsJICA

 

On February 22, 2011,In 2013, the Company signed an agreement amountingProgram Contracts with the municipalities of Presidente Prudente, Embu-Guaçu, Glicério and Ibirá to ¥ 33.6 billion (equivalent to R$ 710 million) with Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to accelarate the water recuperation program. The agreement last 25 years and the interest rate is 1.7% per annum.

provide sanitation services.

 

 

* * *

F-95

F-103